Speaker 1: Thanks to all of you for being with us. Right
Speaker 1: down our toll free telephone number this Friday, it is
Speaker 1: eight hundred and ninety four one Sean if you want
Speaker 1: to join us. The President giving a speech in Arizona
Speaker 1: on the economy. Great great news. I mean, if you
Speaker 1: if you look at the average American and how much
Speaker 1: money they are getting back this year from the IRS
Speaker 1: compared to last year because of the one Big, Beautiful Bill,
Speaker 1: it is a massive amount of money over about thirty
Speaker 1: five hundred dollars on average. That's serious money in people's pockets.
Speaker 1: You're not going to hear it on the fake news
Speaker 1: legacy media mob or hear it from them, which is,
Speaker 1: you know, great for working men and women. They deserve
Speaker 1: a break. We're not an under tax nation. We're an
Speaker 1: overtax nation. And you know, as soon as the price
Speaker 1: of oil, by the way, is way way down today,
Speaker 1: it looks like we're going to set another record on
Speaker 1: the SMP and the Nasdaq. We're almost back to the
Speaker 1: fifty thousand mark on the Dow, which is incredible. It's
Speaker 1: been you know the price of oil, what is it
Speaker 1: down to about eighty one dollars a barrel today? Uh,
Speaker 1: you know, dramatically down based on the news that the
Speaker 1: President had let me digress. One second, Linda, when I
Speaker 1: when I brought up the issue of how much I
Speaker 1: got out of my Catholic upbringing in my life and
Speaker 1: how fundamental it was to the person that I am today,
Speaker 1: I think people missed that part yesterday, correct. They didn't
Speaker 1: want to hear that. That's accurate. Yep. The fact that
Speaker 1: I disagreed with the Pope got a lot of play,
Speaker 1: and the Pope's politics and the Pope getting involved in
Speaker 1: Paul that seemed to get the most play. Right. You
Speaker 1: have been more than forthcoming on everything, right. I mean,
Speaker 1: there's so much that I would not be the person
Speaker 1: I am today without the Catholic Church. When the when
Speaker 1: the Pope says God does not bless any conflict, isn't
Speaker 1: the God of the Old Testament the same God in
Speaker 1: the New Testament. We'll get into this later in the program.
Speaker 1: Because the Bible contains check it out for yourself. You
Speaker 1: get hit rock hitchat GVT. Look it up. It contains
Speaker 1: over four hundred references to war depicting God again the
Speaker 1: God of the New Testaments, the same God in the
Speaker 1: Old Testament. I am my father are one. I come
Speaker 1: to fulfill the prophets and the scripture and the etcetera, etcetera,
Speaker 1: and the law, and I do the will of my father.
Speaker 1: You know, I am, always was, always will be ever present,
Speaker 1: omnipotent anyway, But anyway, the Bible depicts God authorizing, commanding,
Speaker 1: and intervening in battles. That contradicts what the Pope said.
Speaker 1: God does not bless any conflict. So I took it on.
Speaker 1: How long I've been doing this since nineteen eighty seven?
Speaker 1: What did I tell you yesterday before I dip my
Speaker 1: toe into this topic? I said, watch what happens? Did
Speaker 1: I not? Yes, you did. I mean, I've done it
Speaker 1: long enough to know when I'm going to say some
Speaker 1: thing that some people are not going to like. What
Speaker 1: do you think You're smarter than the Pope? You know
Speaker 1: more about the Bible than the Pope. No, But I
Speaker 1: just think the Pope is wrong on this. And I
Speaker 1: think that the world is better off without having a
Speaker 1: nuclear armed Iran. And I think, you know, especially after
Speaker 1: the last century and one hundred million dead people, because
Speaker 1: we didn't neutralize threats when we had all the evidence
Speaker 1: we'd ever need. Were emerging, and we didn't take them out.
Speaker 1: The world didn't take them out. I think if you
Speaker 1: don't learn the lessons of history, you do them to
Speaker 1: repeat it. Anyway, we'll get back to that later in
Speaker 1: the program. Don't need to digress too deeply right now.
Speaker 1: But I fully expected. Every attack I've gotten is not
Speaker 1: one that surprised me. There's not one, and it's all predictable.
Speaker 1: The interesting thing is everyone forgot all the good things
Speaker 1: that I said about the Catholic Church and how influential
Speaker 1: it was in my life and out of My faith
Speaker 1: has grown dramatically as a result of that foundation. Twelve
Speaker 1: years in Catholic schools, four years in a seminary studying
Speaker 1: theology Latin, going to Mass every day, how beautiful the
Speaker 1: Mass is, how instrumental it was to forming my conscience,
Speaker 1: to my foundational understanding of Christianity, which it is the
Speaker 1: most important thing in my life. And well, Donald Trump's
Speaker 1: not perfect. You know, he's the president, he's not the pope.
Speaker 1: The pope should be about faith, God, religion and Jesus
Speaker 1: in my view, and should be biblically accurate. And I
Speaker 1: just they just have very different roles. And maybe that's
Speaker 1: where the conflict comes in. I was not doing it
Speaker 1: to do great people in any way, and if people
Speaker 1: took it that way, I was not intended to be
Speaker 1: that way, all right. So the President announced Iran, with
Speaker 1: the help of the US, as removed or is removing
Speaker 1: all C minds. Thank you, President dj T. The President says, Iran,
Speaker 1: with the help of the US, is working to remove
Speaker 1: all SA minds from the straight up Hormuz important also,
Speaker 1: and he has just been on a truth storm. The
Speaker 1: failing New York Times and fake news CNN and others
Speaker 1: they don't know what to do, desperately looking for a
Speaker 1: reason to criticize President Donald J. Trump on the Iran situation,
Speaker 1: but they really can't find it. Why don't they just
Speaker 1: say at the right time, job well done, mister president,
Speaker 1: and start to gain back some credibility. Anyway, the President
Speaker 1: has been tweeting and or true thing all over the place.
Speaker 1: Thank you to Pakistan, the great Prime Minister Field Marshall,
Speaker 1: two fantastic people. Again, this steal is not tied in
Speaker 1: any way to Lebanon. We will make Lebanon great again.
Speaker 1: I hope that the ceasefire is real. I've never trusted
Speaker 1: and never believed that the Lebanese army was capable of
Speaker 1: dealing with Hasbala. Maybe with a bankrupting of Iran currently,
Speaker 1: maybe the flow of arms to Iran's proxy has Bala
Speaker 1: in Lebanon will come to an end. President also thanks
Speaker 1: Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Cutter, Katar, whichever you prefer, for
Speaker 1: their bravery and their help. He said, now the straight
Speaker 1: of Hormuz situation is over. I received a call from
Speaker 1: NATO asking if we need some help. I told them
Speaker 1: to stay away unless they want to just load up
Speaker 1: their ships with oil. They were useless when needed a
Speaker 1: paper tiger, President DJT mark my words. And this is
Speaker 1: just a prediction, not based on any anything else. NATO
Speaker 1: and its current configuration will not exist. But maybe the
Speaker 1: best truth of the day by the President, the US
Speaker 1: will get all nuclear dust. What is nuclear dust? That's
Speaker 1: how the President affectionately refers to the sixty percent enriched uranium.
Speaker 1: He said, the US will get all nuclear dust created
Speaker 1: by our great b two bombers. No money will exchange
Speaker 1: hands in any way, shape or form. This deal is
Speaker 1: in no way subject to Lebanon but either but the
Speaker 1: US will separately work with Lebanon and deal with the
Speaker 1: Hezbollah situation in an appropriate manner. Israel will not be
Speaker 1: bombing Lebanon any longer they are prohibited from doing so
Speaker 1: by the US. Enough is enough, thank you, thank you.
Speaker 1: And this is after the most effective attack by the
Speaker 1: Israelis against Hezbalah in Lebanon. Ever, and the President went
Speaker 1: into more detail, the Strait of Hormuz is completely open,
Speaker 1: ready for business full passage. The naval blockade will remain
Speaker 1: in full force and effect as it pertains to Iran
Speaker 1: only until such time as our transaction with Iran as
Speaker 1: one hundred percent complete. This process should go very quickly,
Speaker 1: in that most of the points are already negotiated. Thank
Speaker 1: you for your attention to this matter, President Donald J. Trump.
Speaker 1: Iran has just announced the the Straight of Hormuz is
Speaker 1: fully open and ready for full passage. Anyway, he said,
Speaker 1: it will no longer be used as a weapon against
Speaker 1: the world. So, I mean the President's saying a lot here,
Speaker 1: and I think we need to digest what it is
Speaker 1: that the President saying, if in fact what the President
Speaker 1: is writing that we are now on the verge of
Speaker 1: the Iranians voluntarily giving up their sixty percent enriched uranium,
Speaker 1: that in spite of a lot of liars, conspiracy theorists
Speaker 1: that you know, came up with these concocted views that
Speaker 1: somehow Prime Minister Ntsan Yahoo Israel, Fox News host Sean Hannity,
Speaker 1: Mark Levin, Ben Shapiro, whoever it was, convinced the President
Speaker 1: to do this. They don't know President Donald J. Trump.
Speaker 1: I probably know him better than all of these people combined.
Speaker 1: And I know for a fact that names you would
Speaker 1: know that are dead set and have been the dead
Speaker 1: set against any military action in the Middle East or
Speaker 1: anywhere else. Modern day isolationists. To me that they were
Speaker 1: in front of President Trump, you know, just the day,
Speaker 1: two days, three days before Midnight Hammer, before Epic Fury,
Speaker 1: begging the President not to be involved. I can also
Speaker 1: tell you that there are people very very close in
Speaker 1: his cabinet, in a circle, the highest ranking people in government,
Speaker 1: that there were a number of them that disagreed on
Speaker 1: the military action of Midnight Hammer and Epic Fury. It's
Speaker 1: not like the President didn't hear many opposing voices. It's
Speaker 1: that the President took it all in as he always does,
Speaker 1: and unlike what gets reported by people, then the President
Speaker 1: made up his own mind, which is what I could
Speaker 1: have told you would always be the case. Now they
Speaker 1: have taken out the Navy, they have taken out their
Speaker 1: ballistic missiles to a great extent, they have taken out
Speaker 1: their ability to enrich uranium. Now they're going to get
Speaker 1: these sixty percent enriched uranium. The reason the President went
Speaker 1: forward with epic fury in spite of what some people
Speaker 1: may suggest to you that don't clearly understand the Trump doctrine.
Speaker 1: Trump doctrine has never been isolationism. The Trump doctrine. If
Speaker 1: it was isolationism, we wouldn't have taken out the Isis Caliphate.
Speaker 1: Solomani Bagdaddy dropped the mother of all bombs on Afghanistan,
Speaker 1: and we wouldn't have dropped fourteen bunker buster bombs on
Speaker 1: their nuclear sites. But President Trump realizes also and has learned.
Speaker 1: The President Trump is relying on three specific historic lessons here,
Speaker 1: peace through strength, a which he built out our military
Speaker 1: in the first term. If he didn't, Biden didn't do
Speaker 1: anything to expand it or help it, very important, otherwise
Speaker 1: we would not be as advanced tarily as we are today.
Speaker 1: You're watching the next generation of weaponry in real time,
Speaker 1: be unfold before your rise, and there's going to be
Speaker 1: multiple there's going to be numerous improvements on this at
Speaker 1: a pace that we've never seen in the history of mankind,
Speaker 1: and we better stay ahead of the curve on it.
Speaker 1: He's also relying on the last one hundred years of
Speaker 1: human history, and that is the last century, and that's
Speaker 1: maw China, Thollin Russia, Hitler Germany, Mussolini fascism tojo Japan
Speaker 1: pol potic killing fit. He's relying on that history and
Speaker 1: the idea that historically we could have neutralized many of
Speaker 1: these threats as they were emerging and stating very very
Speaker 1: ambitious goals with a willingness that they were telegraphing pretty
Speaker 1: openly to destroy anybody and everybody in their way to
Speaker 1: achieve it. And what the President's learned is if you
Speaker 1: get a chance to neutralize the threat before they can
Speaker 1: create a modern day Holocaust, it's probably a good idea
Speaker 1: to do it. And I hate Nazi, I just I
Speaker 1: can't stand on Over the years I've resisted this overuse
Speaker 1: of a Nazi analogies, but it's applicable here. If you
Speaker 1: could neutralize Hitler before the Holocaust. Would it have been
Speaker 1: a wise thing to do to listen to the likes
Speaker 1: of Winston Churchill for example, Yes, of course it would.
Speaker 1: Through the prism of history, we can say that. And
Speaker 1: through the prism of history, President Trump has learned that.
Speaker 1: He's applying that now. When the President now is saying
Speaker 1: that we're going to get all of this nuclear dust,
Speaker 1: but the President is saying here is deep, and it
Speaker 1: is profound, and it is beyond impactful. When the President
Speaker 1: says that Iran is removing all sea minds and the
Speaker 1: straight of hoorn Moves is open, that is a huge success.
Speaker 1: And it's only due to the President's peace through strength
Speaker 1: policies in his naval blockade that many didn't think would
Speaker 1: be successful. When the President said, this deal is not
Speaker 1: tied in any way to Lebanon, but he still wants
Speaker 1: to try for a peace deal with Lebanon. In an Israel,
Speaker 1: the President is showing once again that he is, you know,
Speaker 1: puts peace first. He's given the Iranians every opportunity for
Speaker 1: peace before Midnight Hammer, before the Israeli struck, even before
Speaker 1: that and even before epic fury, they chose not to.
Speaker 1: And then the President going on to say that we
Speaker 1: will be removing all of this nuclear dust is a
Speaker 1: great accomplishment for the world if in fact the president
Speaker 1: ends up being able to accomplish the two things that
Speaker 1: he set out to do. Now, some of you may
Speaker 1: want him to do more. Some of you will say, well,
Speaker 1: you know, we can't if they're allowed to, you know,
Speaker 1: keep their ability to have an economy. Well, what about
Speaker 1: the nine billion Iranians, most of which don't want this
Speaker 1: theocracy and this radical Islamic regime in place because they're
Speaker 1: being impressed by them. Anyway, you know what happens to
Speaker 1: them if you wipe out the economy. Right now, their
Speaker 1: currency is word zero, they have one hundred and eighty
Speaker 1: percent inflation rate. Over half their workforce is done, and
Speaker 1: the US will get all the nuclear dust. No money
Speaker 1: will exchange hands. There's a lot of rumors about that yesterday.
Speaker 1: This deal is in no way subject to Lebanon. But
Speaker 1: the US will work with Lebanon and deal with the
Speaker 1: his ball of situation in an appropriate manner. Israel has
Speaker 1: agreed not to be bombing Lebanon any longer. Now, are
Speaker 1: you going to tell me that this has not been
Speaker 1: a successful military effort? Other people that are not going
Speaker 1: to be able to say the world's a safer place.
Speaker 1: I don't think so. Democrats have been predicting a disaster.
Speaker 1: The isolationists have been wanting failure. That one thing they
Speaker 1: all have in common, all the presidents' opponents, they have
Speaker 1: wanted him to fail. He's not failed. He has succeeded
Speaker 1: on a level that nobody would have thought possible. No
Speaker 1: president could have accomplished but him. As far as I'm concerned,
Speaker 1: my teach news on so many different fronts. Eight hundred
Speaker 1: nine to fourt one, Shawn is on number. We'll get
Speaker 1: to a lot of your calls. I know some of
Speaker 1: you mad at me over my comments about the pope
Speaker 1: attacking the president. And how dare you, mister Hannay, how
Speaker 1: dare you point out that there are four hundred direct
Speaker 1: references from God about war which contradicts the pope. Okay,
Speaker 1: unless he speaks ex cathedra, and that means he's not infallible.
Speaker 1: I learned that in Theology too. Exposing government waste and
Speaker 1: abuse of your liberties every day. Sean Hannity is on
Speaker 1: right now, all right, I want to highlight again very
Speaker 1: specifically what the president is saying, because it's been a
Speaker 1: lot of speculation and I don't know why. Yesterday, I
Speaker 1: was getting all these panic calls that the President he's
Speaker 1: about to pay money to the Iranians for the dust,
Speaker 1: and I'm like, that doesn't sound like President Trump to me.
Speaker 1: But I was listening to them, and there were no
Speaker 1: confirmed reports of it, and I did my own digging
Speaker 1: and I found out it wasn't true. And this just
Speaker 1: seems to happen to President Trump all the time. I'm
Speaker 1: not really sure why, but it does. And it's frustrating.
Speaker 1: It's frustrating because I think people have agendas. So the
Speaker 1: only real word that we can count on is the
Speaker 1: President's home words. And we have been talking in great
Speaker 1: length and great specificity about the sixty percent enriched uranium.
Speaker 1: Remember I brought Steve Whitcoff, the Middle East Envoy. I
Speaker 1: brought him on not once, but twice. He've been on
Speaker 1: radio and TV, and I brought him on because I
Speaker 1: don't think people heard what he was saying before epic
Speaker 1: fury the first time, because in spite of a lot
Speaker 1: of lies and conspiracy theories being spread by people that
Speaker 1: have whatever agenda they have, and I don't really care
Speaker 1: about them. I just like, I really have no interest
Speaker 1: in arguing with people that did not think it was
Speaker 1: necessary to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon, because
Speaker 1: I just don't think they're very intelligent. I don't think
Speaker 1: they understand. I don't think they've learned a lesson from
Speaker 1: the last century. I don't think that they understand the
Speaker 1: Trump doctrine or care to understand the Trump doctrine. I
Speaker 1: don't think they. I think the people that buy into
Speaker 1: isolationism are very very naive because eventually, and there was
Speaker 1: a very strong isolationist movement. They didn't want America to
Speaker 1: get involved in World War Two, and we paid a
Speaker 1: very very high, dear price for World War Two. Just
Speaker 1: look at D Day, look at slamming the beaches in Normandy.
Speaker 1: Look at the tremendous price we paid. You know, look
Speaker 1: at what happened in Pearl Harbor. You know, people like
Speaker 1: my father spent four years in the Pacific. My father
Speaker 1: lost a lot of friends. So the president learned those
Speaker 1: lessons and many others have not. And we'll get into
Speaker 1: that in a second. But for the President to announce
Speaker 1: that the Iranians now have agreed to give up the
Speaker 1: sixty percent enriched uranium, as he affectionately calls nuclear dust
Speaker 1: created by our great b two bombers. No money now again,
Speaker 1: this is what people were calling me, telling me yesterday
Speaker 1: and names you'd RECOGNI and they were in a state
Speaker 1: of panic. The President's given in, the President's given in.
Speaker 1: I'm like, doesn't sound like him to me. Let me,
Speaker 1: let me do a little digging, let me make a
Speaker 1: few phone calls, let me see what's really going on.
Speaker 1: And if you really know what Donald Trump, if you
Speaker 1: really want to know what he's thinking, you got to
Speaker 1: listen to what he's saying. And this is what he's posting.
Speaker 1: And when he's posting, he's saying it. He said, no
Speaker 1: money will exchange hands in any way, shape or form.
Speaker 1: Last night, I think I saw the first article and
Speaker 1: the first massive blaring headline, Donald Trump to give twenty
Speaker 1: billion dollars to Iran if they give up, if they
Speaker 1: give up their enriched uranium. Okay, And then I'm like,
Speaker 1: this doesn't sound like Donald Trump to me. This is
Speaker 1: not the guy that wrote the Art of the deal.
Speaker 1: That's not how this guy negotiates. Now, when President Trump
Speaker 1: had lost his voice earlier in this this week. I
Speaker 1: happened to know a thing or two about losing voices,
Speaker 1: and there's been more than one occasion I've talked to
Speaker 1: the President about how to get your voice back quickly,
Speaker 1: and there are medications that you can use. I also
Speaker 1: thought people like my friend Curtis Sliwo ran for me.
Speaker 1: He used to lose his voice all the time, and
Speaker 1: I tell him how to get it back. And so anyway,
Speaker 1: I did talk to the President. He was screaming he
Speaker 1: had taken over the negotiations with Iran. That's that's one
Speaker 1: of the untold stories. There had been other people involved,
Speaker 1: but finally the President said, you know what, they've got
Speaker 1: to hear directly from me and we I And that
Speaker 1: also is like part of Donald Trump's personality too. And
Speaker 1: this is where if you recall Linda long before epic
Speaker 1: fury started, and you can confirm what I am saying
Speaker 1: is true? Did I not say many times in the
Speaker 1: days leading up to that opening salvo that took out
Speaker 1: the Supreme Leader and his top lieutenants, Did I not
Speaker 1: after reports came out that they had a plane on
Speaker 1: a tarmac and were ready to seek exile in Russia,
Speaker 1: and that they'd been granted exile in Russia. And I said,
Speaker 1: they're probably on those planes. They've probably packed with cash
Speaker 1: and other currencies and gold and silver and everything in between.
Speaker 1: And did I not say repeatedly, and you can be
Speaker 1: my witness and we can go back and pull the
Speaker 1: tapes that my advice to the Supreme Leader and those
Speaker 1: around him is get out while you can. Did I
Speaker 1: not warn them many many times? I think you said,
Speaker 1: actually all of you gather in the same exact building
Speaker 1: at the same exact time, so we can kill you
Speaker 1: all at once. Wasn't that what you saw? I can
Speaker 1: always wish for horrible things to happen, is that's what
Speaker 1: they did. They did not heed your advice, that's for sure.
Speaker 1: They did not heed my advice. I said, now would
Speaker 1: be the time to go. And now I have been
Speaker 1: saying that while the I know what president is doing here,
Speaker 1: and I know people are going to hear this and
Speaker 1: they're not going to understand it. Before Israel, remember there
Speaker 1: was the fifty day window where Israel was going to
Speaker 1: negotiate with the Iranians in the hope of a peace deal.
Speaker 1: The President would say every day publicly, my first preference
Speaker 1: is peace. I'd rather this not happen. The fifty days passed,
Speaker 1: the Iranians didn't make a deal. Israel started wiping out
Speaker 1: their air defense systems, their you know, their ballistic missile
Speaker 1: systems and everything in between. And it was the brutal beginning,
Speaker 1: you know, leading up to Midnight Hammer. But even before
Speaker 1: Midnight Hammer, President Trump gave them time to negotiate. In
Speaker 1: other words, at that moment, he was looking for them
Speaker 1: to agree to give up the enrichment of or having
Speaker 1: the ability to enrich uranium, because the Iranians had wanted
Speaker 1: nuclear weapons. President gave them time. Then he dropped fourteen
Speaker 1: bunker buster bombs and wiped out there in Richmond facilities.
Speaker 1: Of course they're going to want to rebuild them, but
Speaker 1: again every generation, we'll have to take on the responsibility
Speaker 1: of protecting freedom for the next generation. And even before
Speaker 1: epic fury, I gave them all this warning. I didn't
Speaker 1: know that their leadership was going to be taken out
Speaker 1: in the opening salvo, but I knew that their lives
Speaker 1: would be at risk. It was very evident that what
Speaker 1: was about to happen. That's why I was saying reports
Speaker 1: their planes are on the tarmac, they've likely filled with cash,
Speaker 1: and they're going to seek asylum in Plutin's Russia. My advice,
Speaker 1: get on that plane as soon as possible and get out. Now,
Speaker 1: why you have a chance. They're all dead. And then
Speaker 1: the next the next tier of leadership is now dead
Speaker 1: as they convened to replace the supreme leader. And then
Speaker 1: after that, the next tier of leaders has been taken out,
Speaker 1: one after another after another. Now we're dealing with the
Speaker 1: fourth and fifthier of leadership. So the President has been
Speaker 1: very patient. It would be very simple for America not
Speaker 1: to need a naval blockade. All we'd have to do
Speaker 1: is take out their ability. Their economy is almost exclusively
Speaker 1: dependent on oil. They have zero currency value right now,
Speaker 1: They have one hundred and eighty percent inflation right now.
Speaker 1: Half of their workforce is out of work and not
Speaker 1: getting any form of income. The country is on the
Speaker 1: vergic collapse. The President could make this permanent. The President, though,
Speaker 1: clearly is thinking about innocent Iranians that had suffered over
Speaker 1: the last forty seven years under this terrorist Islamic revolutionary regime.
Speaker 1: And the president, if he does take carg Island, takes
Speaker 1: away their economy and takes away the ability of the
Speaker 1: U uranium people to build out They're great, they're once
Speaker 1: great culture once again, and he doesn't want to do that.
Speaker 1: It probably would be the safer choice. It would be
Speaker 1: the choice that means that the money that they otherwise
Speaker 1: can get from an oil economy that they the odds
Speaker 1: will be high that they're going to want to build
Speaker 1: out morbillistic missiles, rebuild their missile defense systems, and probably
Speaker 1: reconstitute their nuclear program. I'm not disputing that. However, is
Speaker 1: the world better and safer now that the President announced
Speaker 1: that we will get all of this sixty percent enriched uranium,
Speaker 1: the nuclear dust created by our great B two bombers.
Speaker 1: The President put to rest the lie that he was
Speaker 1: going to pay twenty billion dollars. He said, no money
Speaker 1: will exchange exchange hands in any way, shape or form.
Speaker 1: This deal is in no way subject to Lebanon either.
Speaker 1: There's been a lot of calls I got yesterday that
Speaker 1: it was that these two deals were connected. He's saying, no,
Speaker 1: that's not true. But the US will separately work with
Speaker 1: Lebanon and deal with hiszballah and the situation in an
Speaker 1: appropriate manner as well. Will not be bombing Lebanon anymore longer.
Speaker 1: But that doesn't mean that his balla gets the bomb
Speaker 1: Israel either. At that point the President would reverse course
Speaker 1: pretty quickly. I know him pretty well. And so the
Speaker 1: President is talking about great success here. And then the
Speaker 1: President said the straight of horm Moves is open, and
Speaker 1: the Iranians have said that the straight oh hor Mooz
Speaker 1: is open. And he said, now that the horm Movez
Speaker 1: straight situation is over, he goes, I just received a
Speaker 1: call from NATO asking if we would need some help.
Speaker 1: I mean, it was a big proclamation that Starmer and
Speaker 1: McCrone were meeting on the situation and how can they
Speaker 1: get the straight of hor Moves open? Well, the President
Speaker 1: put out another truth, The Straight of hor Moves is
Speaker 1: completely open, ready for business full at full passage. The
Speaker 1: naval blockade will remain in force and effect as it
Speaker 1: pertains to Iran only until such time is our transaction
Speaker 1: with the Ran as one hundred percent complete. This process
Speaker 1: should go very quickly, and that most of the points
Speaker 1: are already negotiated. Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Speaker 1: And then Iran announced that the Straight of Horror Moves
Speaker 1: is fully and ready to use for full passage. Now,
Speaker 1: I have no doubt that there's probably some holdovers in
Speaker 1: the Iranian regime that don't want any of this. But
Speaker 1: if the President is able to pull all of this
Speaker 1: off with a minimal, minimal, especially by historical comparisons, amount
Speaker 1: of calciatles, you know, I just say to anybody with
Speaker 1: an announce of common sense, is the world better off?
Speaker 1: Is the world safer? Did the President not take a
Speaker 1: great political but yet calculated risk to make the world safer?
Speaker 1: As the President been consistent in what his goals are here,
Speaker 1: has the President achieved every military objective? Does the President
Speaker 1: really want a blockade to stay there forever? I don't
Speaker 1: think so. Is the President really trying to make peace
Speaker 1: with Israel and Lebanon? I believe he is. Does the
Speaker 1: President want to see peace deals emerge on the other
Speaker 1: side of this, with countries like Saudi Arabia and every
Speaker 1: other Gulf country recognizing Israel's right to exist and going
Speaker 1: into peace agreements, Yes he does. Does the President really
Speaker 1: want an end to the conflict in Europe with Ukraine
Speaker 1: in Russia? Yeah he does. But for the Iranians to
Speaker 1: agree to handover the enriched uranium, open up the strait.
Speaker 1: You've got to say that this is a tremendous moment
Speaker 1: of success based entirely on a president's on wavering commitment
Speaker 1: to destroy the ability of this regime to ever have
Speaker 1: a nuclear weapon, the understanding that the world would be
Speaker 1: held hostage if in fact they did. Israeli Prime Minister
Speaker 1: bb Netnaw who confirmed the ceasefire with Lebanon, hailing it
Speaker 1: as an opportunity to make historic peace with Lebanon. In
Speaker 1: a later state in Netnow who claimed the agreement was
Speaker 1: accepted at Trump's request, adding that Israel will provide an
Speaker 1: opportunity to advance an integrated diplomatic and military solution with
Speaker 1: the Lebanese government. He praised the president's help in changing
Speaker 1: the Middle East and achieving tremendous accomplishments. Now, by the way,
Speaker 1: they may have different goals than America has, meaning Israel,
Speaker 1: but that's not been what the president's stated goal is.
Speaker 1: And if we get the dust, the Strait of Hormuz
Speaker 1: is open. How do you say that this is anything
Speaker 1: but an unprecedented historical military success. You know, and it
Speaker 1: was a great article out there. Despite constant media lying
Speaker 1: democrats life, this has been a tremendous success for the president.
Speaker 1: And by the way, like everything this president and it does,
Speaker 1: he's willing to take great risk to do great, big things. Oh,
Speaker 1: you know, we'll find out how this all ends. I
Speaker 1: hope it ends peacefully. I've been saying that for a
Speaker 1: long time. I really do hope it ends peacefully. I
Speaker 1: think it's better for the world. How ridiculous is it
Speaker 1: that today that Neville Chamberlain, Keir Starmer, and French President Macrone.
Speaker 1: You know, they're now being laughed at for playing the
Speaker 1: role of being relevant as it relates to the Straight
Speaker 1: or her moves. They're meeting in Paris for critical discussions
Speaker 1: on reopening the Straight. Maybe somebody should tell them that,
Speaker 1: guess what, Donald Trump already accomplished that for you, and
Speaker 1: you would nowhere to be found. So when America pulls
Speaker 1: out of NATO and you're left to defend yourself, maybe
Speaker 1: you'll regret not being having the moral clarity to stand
Speaker 1: up against the number one state sponsor terror. Right will
Speaker 1: be come back. I know some of you want to
Speaker 1: call about my comments on the FOBE. We'll get to that,
Speaker 1: Alan Derschwitz, Maheck Cook, and much more. We'll do a
Speaker 1: news round up for the week