WEBVTT - The ETF Space Race

0:00:05.840 --> 0:00:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Trilliance. I'm Joel Webber and I'm Eric bel

0:00:08.400 --> 0:00:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Tunis Eric. Sometimes it feels like the E t F

0:00:13.560 --> 0:00:16.760
<v Speaker 1>space doesn't have a whole lot of white space for

0:00:16.960 --> 0:00:20.360
<v Speaker 1>new products. Basically everything's taken up. I mean, we're living

0:00:20.400 --> 0:00:23.320
<v Speaker 1>in a world where there's a pet carry TF, video game,

0:00:23.360 --> 0:00:26.400
<v Speaker 1>et F, you name it, quantum computing. There's now ets

0:00:26.440 --> 0:00:27.920
<v Speaker 1>for things that don't even know what those things are.

0:00:27.920 --> 0:00:30.760
<v Speaker 1>I gotta go research them. So yeah, there's really hardly

0:00:30.800 --> 0:00:33.880
<v Speaker 1>any more ideas here on planet Earth. So maybe instead

0:00:33.880 --> 0:00:36.000
<v Speaker 1>of looking for white space, people need to look for

0:00:37.000 --> 0:00:39.879
<v Speaker 1>real space, black space and leave Earth. That's what we're

0:00:39.880 --> 0:00:42.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna spend. What are we hinting at here? A space

0:00:43.080 --> 0:00:46.360
<v Speaker 1>the Final Frontier, literally the Final Frontier. There's a race

0:00:46.560 --> 0:00:49.440
<v Speaker 1>going on with companies. You've got the Space Force, you know,

0:00:49.479 --> 0:00:52.160
<v Speaker 1>coming into play, and now there's ETFs that are sort

0:00:52.159 --> 0:00:54.680
<v Speaker 1>of trying to get ahead of that, and you know,

0:00:54.720 --> 0:00:57.360
<v Speaker 1>see if they can appeal to investor's imagination and hopefully

0:00:57.560 --> 0:00:59.520
<v Speaker 1>get some performance while they're at it. And this was

0:00:59.600 --> 0:01:03.160
<v Speaker 1>another episode where we decided to outsource it to the

0:01:03.240 --> 0:01:07.080
<v Speaker 1>ever intrepid Rachel Evans at Bloomberg News, who actually wouldn't

0:01:07.080 --> 0:01:10.200
<v Speaker 1>talk to people who are involved directly in this space. Yeah,

0:01:10.240 --> 0:01:13.400
<v Speaker 1>this from lent itself to field work because there's it's

0:01:13.440 --> 0:01:15.520
<v Speaker 1>a whole industry and a lot of people don't know

0:01:15.520 --> 0:01:17.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot about it and how legitimative is it. And

0:01:17.560 --> 0:01:23.400
<v Speaker 1>she found some characters, some really good characters. Yeah, this

0:01:23.520 --> 0:01:32.280
<v Speaker 1>week gund trillions the E t F space race and

0:01:32.400 --> 0:01:35.080
<v Speaker 1>that's when it happened. That's when we first heard that

0:01:35.120 --> 0:01:37.839
<v Speaker 1>they had come by. That's when we should have prepared

0:01:37.840 --> 0:01:42.720
<v Speaker 1>ourselves for any eventuality, But we didn't imagine yourself as

0:01:42.800 --> 0:01:45.560
<v Speaker 1>one of the crew of this faster than light spaceship

0:01:45.640 --> 0:01:49.000
<v Speaker 1>of the future. You'll boldly go where no man has

0:01:49.080 --> 0:01:54.840
<v Speaker 1>gone before, space, the Final Frontier. Just the mention of it,

0:01:54.960 --> 0:01:59.000
<v Speaker 1>conscious images of Ewoks, zig Stardust, every sci fi book

0:01:59.040 --> 0:02:04.280
<v Speaker 1>you ever read as a kid. It what if you're

0:02:04.280 --> 0:02:07.080
<v Speaker 1>grown up self could invest in the cosmos just as

0:02:07.120 --> 0:02:10.519
<v Speaker 1>easily as the US stock market. That's the mission for

0:02:10.560 --> 0:02:12.760
<v Speaker 1>a clutch of new and planned E t F s.

0:02:13.080 --> 0:02:23.040
<v Speaker 1>They want to take investing out of this world. To

0:02:23.120 --> 0:02:26.320
<v Speaker 1>find out more about this new opportunity, I headed to

0:02:26.360 --> 0:02:30.239
<v Speaker 1>the Hayden Planetarium in New York's Natural History Museum to

0:02:30.320 --> 0:02:34.440
<v Speaker 1>meet Christopher Kramer, a PhD student at Brown University and

0:02:34.600 --> 0:02:38.840
<v Speaker 1>an expert in Martian rocks. The lady on the desk said,

0:02:38.840 --> 0:02:41.680
<v Speaker 1>I could go straight in with a thank you very much,

0:02:45.440 --> 0:02:57.119
<v Speaker 1>thank Hello are your Christopher? Rachel everts between backing news,

0:02:57.160 --> 0:03:01.600
<v Speaker 1>how how are you doing at this is cool? Christopher

0:03:01.760 --> 0:03:03.639
<v Speaker 1>was in town to host a three D tour of

0:03:03.720 --> 0:03:07.040
<v Speaker 1>the Red Planet, but first we sat down deep in

0:03:07.120 --> 0:03:09.680
<v Speaker 1>the bowels of the museum to chat about the types

0:03:09.720 --> 0:03:13.120
<v Speaker 1>of companies doing business in space. There's been pretty sense

0:03:13.160 --> 0:03:17.440
<v Speaker 1>of commercialization in the realm of lower orbiting satellites are

0:03:17.480 --> 0:03:21.600
<v Speaker 1>just they're various commercial satellites, artificial satellites that over the

0:03:21.680 --> 0:03:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Earth that are the foundation of various communications technologies that

0:03:26.520 --> 0:03:29.440
<v Speaker 1>we use today. And there is a big push through

0:03:29.480 --> 0:03:32.560
<v Speaker 1>the miniaturization of satellites to make it even easier for

0:03:33.040 --> 0:03:38.800
<v Speaker 1>various public and private interests to deploy their instrumentation of choice,

0:03:39.320 --> 0:03:42.480
<v Speaker 1>their hardware of choice into Earth orbit. And so they're

0:03:42.520 --> 0:03:44.080
<v Speaker 1>huge profits to be made. And I think that they're

0:03:44.200 --> 0:03:46.800
<v Speaker 1>huge profits being made in that in that realm right now.

0:03:47.280 --> 0:03:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Even as many of us in the US now stream

0:03:49.720 --> 0:03:53.680
<v Speaker 1>a favorite shows, these satellites beam TV into millions of

0:03:53.760 --> 0:03:58.080
<v Speaker 1>homes around the world. They're also responsible for positioning technology

0:03:58.480 --> 0:04:01.720
<v Speaker 1>like the GPS in your car and ensuring that everyone

0:04:01.800 --> 0:04:05.480
<v Speaker 1>agrees what time it is at any given moment. Space,

0:04:05.640 --> 0:04:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Christopher tells me, could also fuel new industries from tourism

0:04:10.480 --> 0:04:14.960
<v Speaker 1>to mining asteroids for precious metals. It all sounds pretty

0:04:15.040 --> 0:04:18.600
<v Speaker 1>far out. So I went to meet Andrew Channon, whose

0:04:18.640 --> 0:04:21.320
<v Speaker 1>firm Procure a M is one of those planning to

0:04:21.400 --> 0:04:24.520
<v Speaker 1>start a space ETF. I asked him to tell me

0:04:24.920 --> 0:04:28.360
<v Speaker 1>how he got interested in space. So, starting off in

0:04:28.400 --> 0:04:31.200
<v Speaker 1>the et F industry in two thousand seven working for

0:04:31.279 --> 0:04:33.400
<v Speaker 1>an et F specials firm, we're seeing a lot of

0:04:33.440 --> 0:04:35.880
<v Speaker 1>innovation in the ets space. We were kind of past

0:04:35.960 --> 0:04:39.400
<v Speaker 1>that first phase where the low hanging fruit products were

0:04:39.520 --> 0:04:42.560
<v Speaker 1>already taken. So space was always one of those things

0:04:42.640 --> 0:04:48.240
<v Speaker 1>where looking back, yes there are satellite companies and aerospace

0:04:48.560 --> 0:04:51.920
<v Speaker 1>companies and defence companies that were kind of tied into

0:04:52.000 --> 0:04:55.240
<v Speaker 1>this broader theme. Really, we started seeing so much more

0:04:55.320 --> 0:04:59.880
<v Speaker 1>public interest in space over the last several years. Originally,

0:05:00.520 --> 0:05:04.920
<v Speaker 1>in our early days, it was really a government effort,

0:05:05.320 --> 0:05:10.640
<v Speaker 1>and governments wanted to plant their flag figuratively and literally

0:05:11.800 --> 0:05:14.120
<v Speaker 1>on showing how they were the best and that they

0:05:14.200 --> 0:05:16.040
<v Speaker 1>can say we're gonna put a man on the moon

0:05:16.080 --> 0:05:18.080
<v Speaker 1>and they can do it. And I think that was

0:05:18.200 --> 0:05:23.360
<v Speaker 1>one way to to bring the country together but also

0:05:23.600 --> 0:05:28.839
<v Speaker 1>just show what we're capable of. At a certain point,

0:05:29.279 --> 0:05:32.600
<v Speaker 1>governments realized that it's good for us to do this,

0:05:32.720 --> 0:05:36.280
<v Speaker 1>that we can you know, rally our our our citizens

0:05:36.360 --> 0:05:40.280
<v Speaker 1>around it. But does the government really need to be

0:05:40.400 --> 0:05:44.120
<v Speaker 1>the one coming up with all the solutions? And through

0:05:44.240 --> 0:05:49.800
<v Speaker 1>that realization and paving the way forward with regulations, it's

0:05:49.880 --> 0:05:54.720
<v Speaker 1>made companies more comfortable in trying to expand their business

0:05:54.839 --> 0:05:59.760
<v Speaker 1>futures into space as well. So really and very strongly

0:05:59.760 --> 0:06:04.080
<v Speaker 1>in the last decade, you're seeing a huge ship where

0:06:04.480 --> 0:06:08.240
<v Speaker 1>there's a significant amount of investment capital going into the

0:06:08.279 --> 0:06:15.159
<v Speaker 1>private side, not the government side, where wealthy individuals the Basos,

0:06:15.320 --> 0:06:17.760
<v Speaker 1>Branson's and Mosques of the world putting their own money

0:06:17.760 --> 0:06:22.279
<v Speaker 1>where their mouth is and trying to create their own solutions.

0:06:22.400 --> 0:06:23.960
<v Speaker 1>But some of the things that they're trying to do

0:06:24.200 --> 0:06:28.680
<v Speaker 1>actually help out the governments. Jeff Bezos, Richard Branson, and

0:06:28.800 --> 0:06:32.320
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk have all very publicly pursued their own space programs,

0:06:32.920 --> 0:06:35.839
<v Speaker 1>but the broader space industry also has bags of potential.

0:06:37.040 --> 0:06:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Morgan Stanley estimates that space could generate one point one

0:06:40.400 --> 0:06:46.800
<v Speaker 1>trillion of revenue by up from about billion today. Recently,

0:06:47.040 --> 0:06:50.240
<v Speaker 1>NASA invited nine companies to bid for contracts to land

0:06:50.279 --> 0:06:53.880
<v Speaker 1>on the Moon, just after successfully landing a probe on Mars.

0:06:56.240 --> 0:06:58.280
<v Speaker 1>But the space industry could also get a boost from

0:06:58.839 --> 0:07:02.040
<v Speaker 1>another dimension. You look at the universe and how how

0:07:02.080 --> 0:07:04.840
<v Speaker 1>abundant it is, and it makes people think that, you know,

0:07:04.920 --> 0:07:07.760
<v Speaker 1>there's a high probability that we aren't alone. And if

0:07:07.839 --> 0:07:11.760
<v Speaker 1>we aren't alone, all of those could spring some very

0:07:11.920 --> 0:07:16.200
<v Speaker 1>new growth potential in the space industry itself. So, you know,

0:07:16.360 --> 0:07:18.680
<v Speaker 1>are a little green mental mals waking out there or

0:07:18.800 --> 0:07:21.480
<v Speaker 1>some other type of intelligent life. I don't know where

0:07:21.760 --> 0:07:24.600
<v Speaker 1>intelligent life is or what they may look like, but

0:07:25.360 --> 0:07:28.360
<v Speaker 1>I certainly would not be surprised at at some point,

0:07:28.800 --> 0:07:31.920
<v Speaker 1>whether we're we're told or we actually experienced it for ourselves,

0:07:32.400 --> 0:07:35.560
<v Speaker 1>that there that we're not alone. And yeah, I think

0:07:35.680 --> 0:07:37.960
<v Speaker 1>all that makes makes everything, you know, that much more

0:07:38.000 --> 0:07:41.920
<v Speaker 1>exciting when looking at space as as an actual industry.

0:07:43.520 --> 0:07:49.280
<v Speaker 1>What happens when we do meet extraterrestrial life, Well, we

0:07:49.360 --> 0:07:52.000
<v Speaker 1>could become great friends and buddies with them. And we

0:07:52.040 --> 0:07:56.000
<v Speaker 1>could work together and we can learn their technologies and

0:07:56.560 --> 0:08:00.480
<v Speaker 1>make our systems even better and completely transform our of life,

0:08:00.720 --> 0:08:05.280
<v Speaker 1>whether it's on Earth or via using space systems and networks.

0:08:06.000 --> 0:08:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Or what happens when extraterrestrial life absolutely hates us and

0:08:10.200 --> 0:08:12.440
<v Speaker 1>doesn't want to get along with us and they want

0:08:12.440 --> 0:08:14.480
<v Speaker 1>our planet or they want to erase us. Well, in

0:08:14.600 --> 0:08:16.880
<v Speaker 1>that case, we're gonna need a lot of defense spending.

0:08:17.400 --> 0:08:21.360
<v Speaker 1>Those are two completely different paths, but ones that would

0:08:21.440 --> 0:08:27.640
<v Speaker 1>show very different futures for how investments this might might proceed.

0:08:29.520 --> 0:08:32.679
<v Speaker 1>So how does that translate into a fund, Well, it

0:08:32.760 --> 0:08:37.640
<v Speaker 1>depends who's designing it. State Street is the only money

0:08:37.679 --> 0:08:42.160
<v Speaker 1>manager currently out with the spacecf it's Final Frontiers Fund,

0:08:42.520 --> 0:08:46.719
<v Speaker 1>which also buys companies involved in deep sea exploration, allocates

0:08:46.720 --> 0:08:49.959
<v Speaker 1>about fifty of its assets to aerospace and defense companies

0:08:49.960 --> 0:08:54.360
<v Speaker 1>already found in an existing fund. Andrew Channon can't discuss

0:08:54.400 --> 0:08:56.520
<v Speaker 1>the inner workings of his fund, as it is still

0:08:56.559 --> 0:08:59.360
<v Speaker 1>seeking approval from the u S regulator, but to look

0:08:59.400 --> 0:09:02.120
<v Speaker 1>at the index his fund plans to track suggests it

0:09:02.160 --> 0:09:04.839
<v Speaker 1>will likely allocate almost two thirds of its assets to

0:09:04.920 --> 0:09:09.440
<v Speaker 1>communications and consumer focused firms like Garmen. A third space

0:09:09.480 --> 0:09:12.080
<v Speaker 1>ETF with its own methodology, is also in the works

0:09:12.120 --> 0:09:16.320
<v Speaker 1>from DWS Group. I wanted to learn more about these

0:09:16.360 --> 0:09:19.600
<v Speaker 1>differing approaches and whether investors could feel misled if they

0:09:19.640 --> 0:09:23.319
<v Speaker 1>discovered their Space fund was full of everyday names, so

0:09:24.000 --> 0:09:26.400
<v Speaker 1>I spoke to the man behind the index that Andrew's

0:09:26.440 --> 0:09:31.280
<v Speaker 1>fund intends to use, Mica Walter Range. Mica previously worked

0:09:31.320 --> 0:09:34.840
<v Speaker 1>for the Space Foundation, a nonprofit that supports space activities,

0:09:35.200 --> 0:09:38.679
<v Speaker 1>and partnering with s Network Global Indexes to create the benchmark.

0:09:38.840 --> 0:09:42.360
<v Speaker 1>I think it's largely a matter of the story of

0:09:42.520 --> 0:09:45.840
<v Speaker 1>explaining the people. Many people don't even understand that GPS

0:09:45.960 --> 0:09:50.120
<v Speaker 1>is an important component of their cell phones and the

0:09:50.200 --> 0:09:52.840
<v Speaker 1>other systems that they use on a daily basis. Even

0:09:52.880 --> 0:09:56.719
<v Speaker 1>in the financial industry, probably most people don't understand that

0:09:57.440 --> 0:10:02.520
<v Speaker 1>the timing of the global financial network is governed from space.

0:10:02.760 --> 0:10:09.440
<v Speaker 1>So understanding just how intimately involved space is in our

0:10:09.520 --> 0:10:13.079
<v Speaker 1>daily lives is something that I think actually does get

0:10:13.160 --> 0:10:15.880
<v Speaker 1>people excited when they realize that we have all of

0:10:15.960 --> 0:10:19.280
<v Speaker 1>these wonderful things because of space. A number of the

0:10:19.320 --> 0:10:23.760
<v Speaker 1>companies in the index are actively engaged in exploration. They're

0:10:23.960 --> 0:10:27.160
<v Speaker 1>building the technology, they're putting together the systems that will

0:10:27.280 --> 0:10:31.040
<v Speaker 1>be used to send robots to other planets, to send

0:10:31.120 --> 0:10:35.319
<v Speaker 1>people deep into space. If you're investing now, that's what

0:10:35.480 --> 0:10:38.480
<v Speaker 1>you can look forward to seeing in the future. The

0:10:38.559 --> 0:10:41.600
<v Speaker 1>other part is a lot of people are excited about

0:10:41.640 --> 0:10:46.880
<v Speaker 1>some of these new space startups. But UM these companies

0:10:46.920 --> 0:10:50.719
<v Speaker 1>that are trying to do different things from UM what

0:10:50.880 --> 0:10:52.640
<v Speaker 1>has been done in the past, or doing them in

0:10:52.720 --> 0:10:55.480
<v Speaker 1>different ways. How many of these, of course are not

0:10:55.640 --> 0:11:00.360
<v Speaker 1>publicly traded, not yet. However, they off them to have

0:11:00.640 --> 0:11:05.559
<v Speaker 1>partnerships with the current companies that are publicly traded, and

0:11:05.760 --> 0:11:09.400
<v Speaker 1>so when you invest in those companies, you're also in

0:11:09.520 --> 0:11:13.520
<v Speaker 1>a sense investing in those partnerships. And for those of

0:11:13.600 --> 0:11:16.880
<v Speaker 1>us who are not Silicon Valley venture capital firms, it

0:11:17.000 --> 0:11:21.040
<v Speaker 1>may be the only way. That's all sounds compelling, But

0:11:21.160 --> 0:11:24.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm no expert. Do these funds pass the test? Are

0:11:24.360 --> 0:11:27.960
<v Speaker 1>they spacey enough? I asked Christopher Kramer, the Mars academic,

0:11:28.080 --> 0:11:30.080
<v Speaker 1>to take a look at the companies that Andrew's fund

0:11:30.120 --> 0:11:32.199
<v Speaker 1>will likely buy. A right, so, I have a couple

0:11:32.480 --> 0:11:37.520
<v Speaker 1>of UM lists of companies that are proposed to be

0:11:37.960 --> 0:11:41.000
<v Speaker 1>in UM, A couple of ets that are going to

0:11:41.040 --> 0:11:44.120
<v Speaker 1>be sharing launched. Yeah, these are all These are very familiar.

0:11:44.320 --> 0:11:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Um and a lot of these, I mean, just looking

0:11:46.520 --> 0:11:49.040
<v Speaker 1>at these, a lot of these are earth opening satellite companies.

0:11:49.360 --> 0:11:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Do they seem like space companies? Do you? I mean,

0:11:51.080 --> 0:11:53.679
<v Speaker 1>obviously A T and T is kind of a telecommunications

0:11:53.760 --> 0:11:56.440
<v Speaker 1>company really, but I mean, if you're if you're criterion

0:11:56.480 --> 0:11:59.880
<v Speaker 1>it's just that that they have deployed some of their

0:12:00.600 --> 0:12:05.280
<v Speaker 1>corporate hardware assets beyond the edge of Earth's atmosphere, then

0:12:05.559 --> 0:12:08.080
<v Speaker 1>I would say, yeah, that's that's a pretty low bar

0:12:08.200 --> 0:12:10.480
<v Speaker 1>for entry. But I think it's the only really realistic

0:12:10.520 --> 0:12:13.599
<v Speaker 1>criteria that you can use in the year. So I

0:12:13.640 --> 0:12:17.520
<v Speaker 1>would say, um, yeah, absolutely, if you did decide to

0:12:17.760 --> 0:12:22.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of add to a portfolio, um and by you know,

0:12:22.840 --> 0:12:26.320
<v Speaker 1>an ATF, would you consider buying a space ETF. Would

0:12:26.360 --> 0:12:31.080
<v Speaker 1>that be something that would appeal Yeah? Probably, I mean

0:12:31.160 --> 0:12:33.840
<v Speaker 1>I I wouldn't. I would be cautious only if only

0:12:33.920 --> 0:12:35.920
<v Speaker 1>because I mean I feel like I'd be like putting

0:12:35.960 --> 0:12:37.760
<v Speaker 1>my all my eggs in one basket sort of thing, like,

0:12:37.800 --> 0:12:39.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I mean, I'm more invested in space in

0:12:39.600 --> 0:12:41.760
<v Speaker 1>one way, and I don't necessarily want to Maybe I

0:12:41.800 --> 0:12:43.520
<v Speaker 1>want to have like a backup plan in case, in case,

0:12:43.600 --> 0:12:46.400
<v Speaker 1>like the bottom falls out of space exploration. But that's

0:12:46.400 --> 0:12:49.160
<v Speaker 1>not to express any sort of doubt in the in

0:12:49.520 --> 0:12:52.480
<v Speaker 1>the value of these sorts of investments. So if I

0:12:52.920 --> 0:12:56.440
<v Speaker 1>were doing something different in my goal were to make money,

0:12:56.640 --> 0:12:59.240
<v Speaker 1>then I see no reason why not. You just don't

0:12:59.280 --> 0:13:00.920
<v Speaker 1>want to lose your jo of and lose your money

0:13:00.960 --> 0:13:12.040
<v Speaker 1>at the same time. Yeah, I think that's okay. So

0:13:12.160 --> 0:13:15.360
<v Speaker 1>that was amazing. First of all, Little Green Men. Yes, Look,

0:13:15.520 --> 0:13:17.520
<v Speaker 1>this is what stuck out to me is Andrew chaining

0:13:18.160 --> 0:13:19.719
<v Speaker 1>sort of and I just watched this whole thing on

0:13:19.760 --> 0:13:22.400
<v Speaker 1>Netflix about like the edge of the universe and whether

0:13:22.480 --> 0:13:25.319
<v Speaker 1>there's other life, And I love that he sort of said, yeah,

0:13:25.400 --> 0:13:27.360
<v Speaker 1>you think aliens are nice, this will make money. You

0:13:27.400 --> 0:13:29.640
<v Speaker 1>think aliens are like fear Phone will take over Earth?

0:13:29.760 --> 0:13:32.600
<v Speaker 1>This etf will also make money. I thought that was awesome.

0:13:32.640 --> 0:13:34.760
<v Speaker 1>And he's really upfront about the fact that, you know,

0:13:34.840 --> 0:13:37.400
<v Speaker 1>he's been interested in space for a very long time. Yeah,

0:13:37.400 --> 0:13:39.280
<v Speaker 1>he's seen the movies, he's read the books. You know,

0:13:39.360 --> 0:13:40.959
<v Speaker 1>this is an area of interest. He actually has a

0:13:41.000 --> 0:13:43.320
<v Speaker 1>bet going on with his in law was about where

0:13:43.440 --> 0:13:45.920
<v Speaker 1>and when Little Green Men actually arrived. On this point,

0:13:47.800 --> 0:13:49.120
<v Speaker 1>this is the thing he could actually tell me the

0:13:49.200 --> 0:13:51.679
<v Speaker 1>details of the bet. I'll have to go back and

0:13:51.960 --> 0:13:54.880
<v Speaker 1>look at the details, but there is a bat outstanding

0:13:55.120 --> 0:13:56.800
<v Speaker 1>between him and his in law is about when we

0:13:56.840 --> 0:13:59.760
<v Speaker 1>actually get aliens on Earth and region. What was your

0:13:59.840 --> 0:14:01.800
<v Speaker 1>day go away from from really doing this a little

0:14:01.800 --> 0:14:05.800
<v Speaker 1>bit of a deep dive into uh space ets. So

0:14:05.920 --> 0:14:08.040
<v Speaker 1>the big takeaway from me was this kind of gap,

0:14:08.720 --> 0:14:10.800
<v Speaker 1>both in terms of E t f s and in

0:14:11.000 --> 0:14:14.079
<v Speaker 1>terms of space generally, between what's kind of possible now

0:14:14.320 --> 0:14:17.920
<v Speaker 1>and the potential. So you have at the moment, satellites

0:14:17.960 --> 0:14:20.080
<v Speaker 1>are kind of the the sort of the big space

0:14:20.160 --> 0:14:24.240
<v Speaker 1>industry that's out there. Yet there's this potential for asteroid mining,

0:14:24.320 --> 0:14:26.840
<v Speaker 1>getting it kind of precious metals in lumps of rock

0:14:26.920 --> 0:14:30.560
<v Speaker 1>in space. You could be potentially seeking water from from

0:14:30.680 --> 0:14:33.400
<v Speaker 1>asteroids or even from the moon. H there's the potential

0:14:33.440 --> 0:14:36.480
<v Speaker 1>for space tourism. You know, all these incredible, almost crazy

0:14:36.560 --> 0:14:40.560
<v Speaker 1>sounding ideas are potentially possible in the future, but actually

0:14:40.640 --> 0:14:43.720
<v Speaker 1>accessing those ideas now is very difficult because so many

0:14:43.720 --> 0:14:46.360
<v Speaker 1>of those companies aren't public. Also exactly to this private

0:14:46.440 --> 0:14:49.280
<v Speaker 1>public thing, where's something like SpaceX, which is you know,

0:14:49.360 --> 0:14:53.520
<v Speaker 1>I think the third biggest adventure capital backed company in

0:14:53.560 --> 0:14:56.640
<v Speaker 1>the US right now, and and it is has been

0:14:56.800 --> 0:15:00.440
<v Speaker 1>highly successful for Evenlan masking company, but it is not

0:15:00.920 --> 0:15:03.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, a public company yet, so few people can

0:15:03.520 --> 0:15:06.040
<v Speaker 1>actually see returns on that investment. Yeah, And I think

0:15:06.080 --> 0:15:08.600
<v Speaker 1>that's really an issue with thematic funds generally, is that

0:15:08.920 --> 0:15:12.320
<v Speaker 1>how early can you get into these kind of themes.

0:15:13.000 --> 0:15:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Is space developed enough as a concept to be able

0:15:16.040 --> 0:15:17.960
<v Speaker 1>to invest in it now? The funds that are out

0:15:18.000 --> 0:15:20.520
<v Speaker 1>there now sort of suggest that yes you can, because

0:15:20.600 --> 0:15:23.960
<v Speaker 1>you can buy satellite companies, you can buy some of

0:15:24.080 --> 0:15:28.000
<v Speaker 1>the sort of early stage rocket development companies that are public.

0:15:28.240 --> 0:15:30.120
<v Speaker 1>But it is quite a thin field. If you look

0:15:30.160 --> 0:15:32.000
<v Speaker 1>at kind of the number of companies that are in

0:15:32.040 --> 0:15:35.040
<v Speaker 1>these funds, you're looking at around thirty or so. Whereas

0:15:35.080 --> 0:15:37.000
<v Speaker 1>when you compare that to you know, an SP five

0:15:37.080 --> 0:15:39.320
<v Speaker 1>hundred fund for example, that clues in the name you

0:15:39.400 --> 0:15:42.880
<v Speaker 1>have a significantly more diversified set of companies. How does

0:15:42.880 --> 0:15:44.640
<v Speaker 1>that squere with you? Yes, So when I think of

0:15:44.680 --> 0:15:47.280
<v Speaker 1>theme ETFs exactly that I look at how much are

0:15:47.480 --> 0:15:49.400
<v Speaker 1>of these companies are just in run of the mill

0:15:49.480 --> 0:15:54.080
<v Speaker 1>sector or SMP ETFs And here's um the spider space ETF.

0:15:54.200 --> 0:15:57.880
<v Speaker 1>So breaking it down sent industrials, so it's heavy industrials

0:15:58.960 --> 0:16:02.240
<v Speaker 1>that is aerospace and defense companies, So it looks a

0:16:02.320 --> 0:16:04.800
<v Speaker 1>lot like X L I, but more like I T A,

0:16:04.880 --> 0:16:07.360
<v Speaker 1>which is the I shares aerospace and defense. But it

0:16:07.400 --> 0:16:10.840
<v Speaker 1>does have only three percent overlap with the SMP five hundreds,

0:16:10.840 --> 0:16:12.840
<v Speaker 1>So if you do own just sort of like the SMP,

0:16:12.960 --> 0:16:16.120
<v Speaker 1>you're probably not getting a lot of space or military

0:16:16.160 --> 0:16:18.400
<v Speaker 1>spending for that matter. And it's got about a fift

0:16:18.880 --> 0:16:20.520
<v Speaker 1>overlap with I T A, which I thought it would

0:16:20.520 --> 0:16:22.800
<v Speaker 1>have more overlap, So I don't know. It's kind of

0:16:22.880 --> 0:16:25.280
<v Speaker 1>past my overlap sniff test, I guess, And it's about

0:16:25.280 --> 0:16:27.480
<v Speaker 1>the same volatility as a sector E T F. But

0:16:27.560 --> 0:16:30.320
<v Speaker 1>if you're looking at correlations, it's going to correlated I

0:16:30.360 --> 0:16:33.240
<v Speaker 1>T A, but only correlated to the SMP five hundred,

0:16:33.440 --> 0:16:36.320
<v Speaker 1>So it adds a little diversification. So uh, it's better

0:16:36.400 --> 0:16:38.360
<v Speaker 1>than some that I've seen, but there's others that I

0:16:38.400 --> 0:16:40.640
<v Speaker 1>think are even more uh. In in this sort of

0:16:40.680 --> 0:16:43.560
<v Speaker 1>smaller niche area of a fledging industry, this one does

0:16:43.600 --> 0:16:45.560
<v Speaker 1>have some big socks like bowing and whatnot. The really

0:16:45.560 --> 0:16:48.440
<v Speaker 1>interesting thing that from a differentiation perspectives, if you look

0:16:48.480 --> 0:16:50.680
<v Speaker 1>at the cost, now that is something where you really

0:16:50.760 --> 0:16:53.360
<v Speaker 1>do see a gap between something like the SMP five hundreds,

0:16:53.400 --> 0:16:55.720
<v Speaker 1>which you can get for four basis points total stock

0:16:55.760 --> 0:16:58.600
<v Speaker 1>market for three basis points. These funds, the cheapast of

0:16:58.680 --> 0:17:00.960
<v Speaker 1>which is going to charge well, does charge forty five

0:17:01.000 --> 0:17:03.680
<v Speaker 1>basis points. There's a fund in the works from Deutsche

0:17:03.760 --> 0:17:05.359
<v Speaker 1>that would be coming out dw S as I think

0:17:05.400 --> 0:17:08.439
<v Speaker 1>they're now rebranded, that will look to charge fifty basis points.

0:17:08.480 --> 0:17:11.160
<v Speaker 1>And Andrew's fund will look at seventy five basis points.

0:17:11.400 --> 0:17:13.960
<v Speaker 1>So when you think about that versus say three or

0:17:13.960 --> 0:17:16.720
<v Speaker 1>four basis points for your broad SMP five funds, you

0:17:16.760 --> 0:17:18.840
<v Speaker 1>can certainly see that there's an advantage to coming out

0:17:18.880 --> 0:17:22.280
<v Speaker 1>with these thematic products from an issue at perspective for investors. Yeah,

0:17:22.280 --> 0:17:24.399
<v Speaker 1>you gotta pay a bit more. Yeah, absolutely that This

0:17:24.560 --> 0:17:26.800
<v Speaker 1>is sort of like the new active. These are ways

0:17:26.880 --> 0:17:28.280
<v Speaker 1>to sort of roll the dice and try to do

0:17:28.359 --> 0:17:30.320
<v Speaker 1>a little better. And also you can understand them, right,

0:17:30.320 --> 0:17:34.280
<v Speaker 1>they capture imagination. Speaking of that, Andrew's is the most expensive,

0:17:34.320 --> 0:17:36.720
<v Speaker 1>I guess on the list, but his ticker is so

0:17:37.240 --> 0:17:41.159
<v Speaker 1>freaking killer UFO. I mean, he's the guy who came

0:17:41.240 --> 0:17:43.840
<v Speaker 1>up with hack, which is you know, top two best

0:17:43.880 --> 0:17:46.960
<v Speaker 1>tickers ever UFO to me, what's the spider one again?

0:17:47.280 --> 0:17:51.360
<v Speaker 1>It's x k ff. Oh god, that is so bad UFO.

0:17:51.520 --> 0:17:53.520
<v Speaker 1>To me, if if they all start out performing and

0:17:53.600 --> 0:17:56.280
<v Speaker 1>have that sort of nice performance moment, I bet UFO

0:17:56.359 --> 0:17:59.040
<v Speaker 1>does a little better simply because of that capturing of

0:17:59.080 --> 0:18:02.160
<v Speaker 1>the imagination. Although the spider one is forty five, it'll

0:18:02.200 --> 0:18:04.639
<v Speaker 1>be cheap versus sort of you know, flashing. And this

0:18:04.760 --> 0:18:07.320
<v Speaker 1>is another example where you know, we have one product

0:18:07.359 --> 0:18:10.200
<v Speaker 1>that's already out yet, Ufo not out yet, So what's

0:18:10.240 --> 0:18:12.000
<v Speaker 1>that going to be like when it finally does maybe

0:18:12.040 --> 0:18:14.200
<v Speaker 1>come to market, right, Yeah, And the same with the

0:18:14.200 --> 0:18:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Deutsch product, which also has a pretty decent ticker. They're

0:18:16.440 --> 0:18:19.159
<v Speaker 1>looking at Galaxy g l x Y, which you know,

0:18:19.200 --> 0:18:21.280
<v Speaker 1>because it's not bad, it's kind of that's pretty good. Yeah.

0:18:21.400 --> 0:18:23.320
<v Speaker 1>I think the static one is interesting because they're trying

0:18:23.359 --> 0:18:27.119
<v Speaker 1>to draw that connection with their existing sector based products,

0:18:27.160 --> 0:18:28.960
<v Speaker 1>and hence you've got the X at the beginning. They're

0:18:28.960 --> 0:18:31.520
<v Speaker 1>trying to align it with those other kind of sector

0:18:32.000 --> 0:18:34.119
<v Speaker 1>spider ets that are out there and suggesting that this

0:18:34.320 --> 0:18:36.960
<v Speaker 1>is a new type of sector. How much were people

0:18:36.960 --> 0:18:39.040
<v Speaker 1>are willing to talk about sort of just getting this

0:18:39.200 --> 0:18:43.280
<v Speaker 1>real estate now so that if this economy, which is,

0:18:43.480 --> 0:18:45.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's there's certain projections that put it up

0:18:45.680 --> 0:18:47.800
<v Speaker 1>close to like a trillion dollar ors over the next

0:18:48.000 --> 0:18:50.960
<v Speaker 1>couple of years that this will be a place that

0:18:51.040 --> 0:18:53.399
<v Speaker 1>we see this extraordinary growth. So just by having that

0:18:53.520 --> 0:18:56.680
<v Speaker 1>ticker and getting their first, you're basically building the house

0:18:56.760 --> 0:19:00.159
<v Speaker 1>that you'll put furniture and once the company's come to

0:19:00.240 --> 0:19:02.000
<v Speaker 1>bear later well a bit like the real space race.

0:19:02.040 --> 0:19:03.800
<v Speaker 1>It's all about planting a flag, right, you want to

0:19:03.920 --> 0:19:08.159
<v Speaker 1>claim something for that much more eloquently than I agree,

0:19:08.640 --> 0:19:09.960
<v Speaker 1>But I think that's I think it's very true, and

0:19:10.000 --> 0:19:11.720
<v Speaker 1>we've seen it time and again in the E t

0:19:11.880 --> 0:19:14.000
<v Speaker 1>F market. If you are first out there, if you

0:19:14.080 --> 0:19:15.960
<v Speaker 1>have a catchy ticker and can kind of get some

0:19:16.080 --> 0:19:18.720
<v Speaker 1>real estate, then the assets do kind of flow in

0:19:18.880 --> 0:19:20.879
<v Speaker 1>if you see some performance. I mean, that's going to

0:19:20.920 --> 0:19:22.920
<v Speaker 1>be the big sort of test of these products as

0:19:23.000 --> 0:19:25.960
<v Speaker 1>they kind of evolve. Are they able to adapt to

0:19:26.680 --> 0:19:29.240
<v Speaker 1>the direction that the space industry goes? Are they able

0:19:29.280 --> 0:19:32.439
<v Speaker 1>to in their indexes incorporate these new companies in an

0:19:32.480 --> 0:19:35.960
<v Speaker 1>efficient manner and then actually capitalize on that to show performance.

0:19:36.040 --> 0:19:38.879
<v Speaker 1>You can almost just see there's like one dynamite I

0:19:39.000 --> 0:19:41.000
<v Speaker 1>p O that happens at some time in the future,

0:19:41.080 --> 0:19:43.520
<v Speaker 1>whether it's Basin next or somebody else, and it just

0:19:43.760 --> 0:19:47.639
<v Speaker 1>totally sweeps all these up with it. Again, when you

0:19:47.760 --> 0:19:50.119
<v Speaker 1>post that there's a space etf filing, you tend to

0:19:50.160 --> 0:19:53.359
<v Speaker 1>get some snickers on Twitter. There's definitely like it sounds gimmicky, like, oh,

0:19:53.440 --> 0:19:56.119
<v Speaker 1>what are they thinking of next? But let's face it.

0:19:56.359 --> 0:19:58.119
<v Speaker 1>M merri Lynch had a report which you mentioned. I

0:19:58.200 --> 0:20:01.439
<v Speaker 1>believe that the industry Morgans only sorry that could hit

0:20:01.600 --> 0:20:04.680
<v Speaker 1>UM three trillion. It's up from three fifty billions a day.

0:20:05.119 --> 0:20:07.199
<v Speaker 1>I think Berlinch also had a report, And there's are

0:20:07.720 --> 0:20:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Google that, there's articles on these and they're all written

0:20:10.000 --> 0:20:12.400
<v Speaker 1>very legitimately. But for some reason, you take that idea

0:20:12.480 --> 0:20:14.920
<v Speaker 1>put it in a TF and people sometimes think it's

0:20:14.960 --> 0:20:17.520
<v Speaker 1>like a scam or a gimmick, But the people you

0:20:17.640 --> 0:20:21.240
<v Speaker 1>talk to were dead serious because they work in that industry. Yeah.

0:20:21.280 --> 0:20:23.520
<v Speaker 1>I was actually pleasantly surprised by that. I mean, as

0:20:23.520 --> 0:20:25.879
<v Speaker 1>a journalist I come to all these things pretty skeptically

0:20:26.000 --> 0:20:28.560
<v Speaker 1>and trying to pick holes in these things. I actually

0:20:28.640 --> 0:20:30.840
<v Speaker 1>was quite impressed with, like how much potential there is

0:20:30.920 --> 0:20:32.680
<v Speaker 1>for space because it does sound like this kind of

0:20:32.680 --> 0:20:34.800
<v Speaker 1>whack a doodle idea when you kind of like mention

0:20:34.840 --> 0:20:37.280
<v Speaker 1>it's people. I think the issue is still going to

0:20:37.359 --> 0:20:38.879
<v Speaker 1>be can you put that into an e t F?

0:20:39.040 --> 0:20:40.800
<v Speaker 1>And that I think is still kind of an open

0:20:40.920 --> 0:20:44.560
<v Speaker 1>question as to whether these funds really do represent space.

0:20:45.160 --> 0:20:48.040
<v Speaker 1>But they do seem to at least attempt to represent

0:20:48.240 --> 0:20:50.840
<v Speaker 1>it as it currently is, and I think that's going

0:20:50.920 --> 0:20:52.680
<v Speaker 1>to be the kind of question for these funds going

0:20:52.720 --> 0:20:54.439
<v Speaker 1>forward if we're really at the beginning of a new

0:20:54.520 --> 0:20:57.439
<v Speaker 1>space age where there's little micro rockets that can proventile

0:20:57.520 --> 0:20:59.880
<v Speaker 1>stuff like who knows where this goes? So did people

0:21:00.080 --> 0:21:01.359
<v Speaker 1>talked to kind of know what an e t F

0:21:01.520 --> 0:21:03.240
<v Speaker 1>was when you said you're like E t F reporter,

0:21:03.320 --> 0:21:04.639
<v Speaker 1>they had they know that? Or do you have to

0:21:04.640 --> 0:21:07.000
<v Speaker 1>go to like it's like a mutual from the trades? Yeah? No,

0:21:07.320 --> 0:21:09.680
<v Speaker 1>On the on the whole, people were fairly savvy about

0:21:09.720 --> 0:21:11.680
<v Speaker 1>E t F. I thought it was quite interesting chatting

0:21:11.720 --> 0:21:14.240
<v Speaker 1>with the guy Christopher Kramer who is at the Martian

0:21:14.359 --> 0:21:16.280
<v Speaker 1>Rock Expert. I mean, he's, you know, a young guy.

0:21:16.400 --> 0:21:19.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, he's in in his mid twenties studying you know,

0:21:19.520 --> 0:21:21.840
<v Speaker 1>these kind of very spacey things, but you know he's

0:21:21.840 --> 0:21:24.240
<v Speaker 1>still kind of has friends that are interested in e

0:21:24.359 --> 0:21:26.800
<v Speaker 1>TF and and understands what they were. He didn't currently

0:21:26.840 --> 0:21:28.840
<v Speaker 1>own any himself. He had a few mutual funds Index

0:21:28.920 --> 0:21:31.280
<v Speaker 1>mutual funds UM, but he know got the idea of

0:21:31.280 --> 0:21:33.159
<v Speaker 1>an e t F very quickly and was able to

0:21:33.280 --> 0:21:35.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of think about how this might work in that

0:21:35.160 --> 0:21:37.679
<v Speaker 1>sort of instrument. Rachel Evans, thanks for another field trip

0:21:37.760 --> 0:21:44.200
<v Speaker 1>on Trillions. Thanks for having me, Thanks for listening to

0:21:44.280 --> 0:21:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Trillions until next time. You can find us on the

0:21:46.600 --> 0:21:51.359
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg terminals, Bloomberg dot com, Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and wherever

0:21:51.440 --> 0:21:53.920
<v Speaker 1>else you'd like to listen. We'd love to hear from you.

0:21:54.280 --> 0:21:58.320
<v Speaker 1>We're on Twitter, I'm at Joel Webber Show, He's at

0:21:58.560 --> 0:22:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Eric Caltunist, and Ray Chill is at Rachel Evans. Underscore

0:22:02.880 --> 0:22:08.720
<v Speaker 1>and Why Trillions is produced by Magnus Henrickson. Francesca Levy

0:22:08.920 --> 0:22:11.280
<v Speaker 1>is the head of Bloomberg podcast by