1 00:00:00,160 --> 00:00:04,280 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Surveillance with Michael McKee and Tom Keane on demand 2 00:00:04,320 --> 00:00:07,360 Speaker 1: by our Bloomberg Radio Plus app free for iPhone and 3 00:00:07,360 --> 00:00:11,600 Speaker 1: Android devices. Bill, we are creating jobs. I see the 4 00:00:11,640 --> 00:00:17,400 Speaker 1: temporary employment dynamics and all are these good jobs were creating? Well, 5 00:00:17,440 --> 00:00:20,439 Speaker 1: that's the question. Are they good jobs? You know? I 6 00:00:20,480 --> 00:00:23,560 Speaker 1: suspect that some of them are are not great jobs. 7 00:00:24,239 --> 00:00:26,279 Speaker 1: Some of them are at a minimum wage and a 8 00:00:26,320 --> 00:00:29,640 Speaker 1: little bit higher. And um, you know, the the average 9 00:00:30,240 --> 00:00:34,479 Speaker 1: income of American workers is proceeding higher, but not at 10 00:00:34,479 --> 00:00:38,000 Speaker 1: a very rapid pace. I noticed that the hours worked 11 00:00:38,080 --> 00:00:42,120 Speaker 1: in this particular report didn't increase. Yes, the participation rate 12 00:00:42,120 --> 00:00:44,519 Speaker 1: went up, and I think Yelling and Company would be 13 00:00:45,280 --> 00:00:48,879 Speaker 1: heartened by that because the extent that it keeps going up, 14 00:00:48,920 --> 00:00:51,279 Speaker 1: it means more and more people are coming back into 15 00:00:51,320 --> 00:00:55,320 Speaker 1: the workforce and takes pressure off of their Phillips curve 16 00:00:55,360 --> 00:00:59,760 Speaker 1: and off of their tailor models. So it's not exactly 17 00:00:59,800 --> 00:01:03,880 Speaker 1: a robust model from the standpoint of a hike. Uh. 18 00:01:04,080 --> 00:01:07,600 Speaker 1: It maybe a robust model from the standpoint of increasing 19 00:01:07,680 --> 00:01:10,680 Speaker 1: economic growth, which I expect in this quarter to be 20 00:01:10,720 --> 00:01:15,480 Speaker 1: about two How far away from normal is Janet Yellen's 21 00:01:15,520 --> 00:01:23,600 Speaker 1: FED I think they're at least a hundred of two 22 00:01:23,640 --> 00:01:27,400 Speaker 1: Hunter basis points higher in their dots than normal, and 23 00:01:27,480 --> 00:01:31,280 Speaker 1: the the normal is really being fought out and academic circles. 24 00:01:31,760 --> 00:01:34,320 Speaker 1: Most of the research has come from the San Francisco Fed. 25 00:01:34,760 --> 00:01:38,280 Speaker 1: UM they say that at the moment that a zero 26 00:01:38,319 --> 00:01:42,800 Speaker 1: percent real uh you know, FED funds rate might be 27 00:01:42,920 --> 00:01:46,319 Speaker 1: the appropriate rate, which would put it about it one 28 00:01:46,360 --> 00:01:50,800 Speaker 1: and a half percent. The blue dots are significantly higher 29 00:01:50,800 --> 00:01:53,720 Speaker 1: in the out years, and so you know, I think 30 00:01:53,720 --> 00:01:56,800 Speaker 1: the FED still has some rethinking to do. But let 31 00:01:56,880 --> 00:01:58,600 Speaker 1: me mention a point at that time, I think the 32 00:01:58,680 --> 00:02:03,680 Speaker 1: FED based thickly. They're not faking in numbers, but they 33 00:02:03,720 --> 00:02:07,880 Speaker 1: want the market to um to believe that that hikes 34 00:02:07,960 --> 00:02:11,480 Speaker 1: might come sooner and faster than expected, and that means 35 00:02:11,480 --> 00:02:15,880 Speaker 1: a positive yelkre uh. This economy, the finance industry, banks, 36 00:02:15,880 --> 00:02:19,720 Speaker 1: insurance companies all need a positive yelkurve to uh to 37 00:02:19,840 --> 00:02:22,720 Speaker 1: make substantial profits. And so to the extent that those 38 00:02:22,720 --> 00:02:25,960 Speaker 1: blue belts are higher than what they might really think 39 00:02:26,000 --> 00:02:29,240 Speaker 1: if they really thought about it, then uh, you know 40 00:02:29,280 --> 00:02:32,840 Speaker 1: that favors bank margins, and I think what they're really 41 00:02:32,880 --> 00:02:35,760 Speaker 1: shooting for as a positive yelcreve as opposed to being 42 00:02:35,840 --> 00:02:39,760 Speaker 1: practical and where the real interest rate is going. Well, 43 00:02:39,760 --> 00:02:43,120 Speaker 1: the question, Bill is, if you look at the projections 44 00:02:43,200 --> 00:02:45,920 Speaker 1: that FED made in December for the economy in two 45 00:02:46,000 --> 00:02:49,960 Speaker 1: thousand sixteen, we've basically hit all those benchmarks. So are 46 00:02:50,000 --> 00:02:53,240 Speaker 1: they data dependent or not? How is the market supposed 47 00:02:53,240 --> 00:02:56,000 Speaker 1: to divine where the fat is going? If they tell 48 00:02:56,040 --> 00:02:58,480 Speaker 1: you we're going to raise rates based on these forecasts 49 00:02:58,680 --> 00:03:02,720 Speaker 1: and then they don't, well, they're global data dependent, and 50 00:03:02,960 --> 00:03:05,480 Speaker 1: they don't want to admit that. They want to pretend 51 00:03:05,520 --> 00:03:08,320 Speaker 1: that they're the central banker for the United States and 52 00:03:08,400 --> 00:03:10,560 Speaker 1: fact of the central banker for the world, and they 53 00:03:10,560 --> 00:03:14,520 Speaker 1: have global responsibilities because the dollar has the reserve currency. 54 00:03:14,560 --> 00:03:18,080 Speaker 1: They won't really put that in print. So to the 55 00:03:18,120 --> 00:03:21,600 Speaker 1: extent that currencies moved, to the extent that the markets 56 00:03:21,600 --> 00:03:24,920 Speaker 1: have synkholes on a global basis, to the extent that 57 00:03:25,080 --> 00:03:28,640 Speaker 1: emerging market countries do worse that they've been doing better 58 00:03:28,639 --> 00:03:31,280 Speaker 1: in the last few weeks, um, then the FED takes 59 00:03:31,280 --> 00:03:34,760 Speaker 1: that into consideration. And so data dependency extends beyond the 60 00:03:34,880 --> 00:03:38,880 Speaker 1: US economy, although the FED doesn't really want to admit it. Well, 61 00:03:38,880 --> 00:03:41,320 Speaker 1: are we still worried about the dollar. The dollar has 62 00:03:41,360 --> 00:03:43,640 Speaker 1: basically not moved over the last month and a half. 63 00:03:43,960 --> 00:03:46,720 Speaker 1: Trade weighted dollar has actually gone down the trade weighted 64 00:03:46,720 --> 00:03:50,240 Speaker 1: dollar index. Even with this jobs report, there's barely a 65 00:03:50,280 --> 00:03:57,360 Speaker 1: move in the dollar index. Is that still a real concern? Well, 66 00:03:57,360 --> 00:03:59,480 Speaker 1: it's a concern because of the lags. There's a six 67 00:03:59,560 --> 00:04:02,120 Speaker 1: that twelve month leggage, you know, Mike, and uh, we're 68 00:04:02,160 --> 00:04:04,120 Speaker 1: going to be seeing the effects of a stronger dollar 69 00:04:04,240 --> 00:04:06,680 Speaker 1: for you know, at least another six months. But yes, 70 00:04:07,000 --> 00:04:09,920 Speaker 1: the dollar has stopped going up, certainly against many of 71 00:04:09,920 --> 00:04:13,760 Speaker 1: the emerging market countries. Gosh, in Brazil it's it's down 72 00:04:13,800 --> 00:04:18,440 Speaker 1: by ten um. So it's getting better from that standpoint. 73 00:04:18,480 --> 00:04:21,240 Speaker 1: And to the extent that the dollar does weaken, you know, 74 00:04:21,320 --> 00:04:25,680 Speaker 1: that's a benefit as well for SMP five global companies 75 00:04:25,720 --> 00:04:28,720 Speaker 1: that you know, have been affected by a strong dollar 76 00:04:28,800 --> 00:04:31,039 Speaker 1: in the past, and now we'll see the tail wind 77 00:04:31,080 --> 00:04:34,200 Speaker 1: going forward as we move into two thousand and sixteen. 78 00:04:34,240 --> 00:04:36,720 Speaker 1: If you're just joining us on Bloomberg Television, Bloomberg Radio 79 00:04:36,800 --> 00:04:40,360 Speaker 1: worldwide and across the nation. After the jobs report, Bill 80 00:04:40,360 --> 00:04:44,480 Speaker 1: Gross of Jane's Capital Mr. Gross driving the market's higher, No, White, Mike, 81 00:04:44,520 --> 00:04:47,280 Speaker 1: it was a job's report features up to now up 82 00:04:47,320 --> 00:04:50,520 Speaker 1: eleven down, futures up eighty five, and we've seen some 83 00:04:50,640 --> 00:04:53,920 Speaker 1: significant yield moves Mike Butcher sing out, I can give 84 00:04:53,960 --> 00:04:58,080 Speaker 1: you the recent high, the reason high off the Bloomberg January, 85 00:04:58,720 --> 00:05:01,240 Speaker 1: and we came down downw only year and we come 86 00:05:01,320 --> 00:05:03,160 Speaker 1: right back up and now broken out in a two 87 00:05:03,240 --> 00:05:06,200 Speaker 1: year yield down. We going up up up into a 88 00:05:06,279 --> 00:05:11,880 Speaker 1: higher Michael McKee, the ten year yield up four basis points. Well, Bill, 89 00:05:11,920 --> 00:05:15,200 Speaker 1: what's the proper pricing for bonds right now, for the 90 00:05:15,279 --> 00:05:18,280 Speaker 1: yield curve right now, given the fact that the economy 91 00:05:18,279 --> 00:05:20,880 Speaker 1: seems to be coming back more strongly, but the Fed 92 00:05:20,960 --> 00:05:25,000 Speaker 1: doesn't seem to be ready to do anything. Well, let's 93 00:05:25,160 --> 00:05:28,039 Speaker 1: look at this two ways, myke. One from the standpoint 94 00:05:28,040 --> 00:05:31,080 Speaker 1: of what the Fed would do over the next twelve months. 95 00:05:31,400 --> 00:05:33,760 Speaker 1: You know, the market has factored in a one hike 96 00:05:34,240 --> 00:05:38,080 Speaker 1: and then one hike in the year beyond that. Perhaps 97 00:05:38,120 --> 00:05:41,400 Speaker 1: that's a little light, and so that would suggest perhaps 98 00:05:41,480 --> 00:05:45,280 Speaker 1: that the tenure is at a relatively low level compared 99 00:05:45,320 --> 00:05:47,480 Speaker 1: to where it should be. Let's compare it though to 100 00:05:47,640 --> 00:05:51,480 Speaker 1: the global market, and that's a key relative measure. I mean, 101 00:05:51,680 --> 00:05:54,960 Speaker 1: Japanese ten years in Japanese thirty years have gone down 102 00:05:54,960 --> 00:05:57,719 Speaker 1: by thirty or four or fifty basis points in the 103 00:05:57,720 --> 00:06:00,279 Speaker 1: past four or five weeks. And the course, we have 104 00:06:00,360 --> 00:06:03,760 Speaker 1: to compare the U. S. Treasury tenure to the German 105 00:06:03,760 --> 00:06:06,440 Speaker 1: Boon tenure and and take a spread there. And so 106 00:06:06,520 --> 00:06:09,000 Speaker 1: it's not just what the Fed might do, but it's 107 00:06:09,040 --> 00:06:13,119 Speaker 1: the comparison relative to global markets. And global markets, no doubt, 108 00:06:13,120 --> 00:06:16,320 Speaker 1: are pulling down US rates. And to the extent that 109 00:06:16,480 --> 00:06:19,800 Speaker 1: draggy you know next week, you know, continues to go 110 00:06:19,839 --> 00:06:23,440 Speaker 1: into negative territory, and to the extent that uh, the 111 00:06:23,520 --> 00:06:26,920 Speaker 1: bo j continues to move down into negative territory than 112 00:06:27,000 --> 00:06:30,240 Speaker 1: the U. S. Treasury is supported to some extent, and 113 00:06:30,320 --> 00:06:33,800 Speaker 1: price and yields are carried to some extent. Willill help 114 00:06:33,839 --> 00:06:36,240 Speaker 1: me here with the oddities of the moment, I don't 115 00:06:36,240 --> 00:06:39,520 Speaker 1: mean the San Francisco forty niners or American politics. I 116 00:06:39,560 --> 00:06:42,960 Speaker 1: would suggest Bill Gross, would you explain negative rates and 117 00:06:43,000 --> 00:06:48,880 Speaker 1: what it means for Janic's capital and for your unconstrained portfolio. Well, sure, 118 00:06:49,600 --> 00:06:52,800 Speaker 1: you know, obviously you only want to invest the negative 119 00:06:52,880 --> 00:06:54,960 Speaker 1: rates if you think they're going more negative that would 120 00:06:54,960 --> 00:06:58,080 Speaker 1: produce a higher price in terms of a bond. We 121 00:06:58,120 --> 00:07:01,479 Speaker 1: don't really do that because I think the move is 122 00:07:01,560 --> 00:07:05,760 Speaker 1: limited and you can only go so negative before domestic 123 00:07:05,760 --> 00:07:10,200 Speaker 1: economy has become affected by it and it becomes destructive. 124 00:07:10,480 --> 00:07:13,880 Speaker 1: What we're trying to do is basically range bound UH 125 00:07:14,040 --> 00:07:17,240 Speaker 1: central banks. We believe that central banks won't move far, 126 00:07:17,440 --> 00:07:21,960 Speaker 1: that they were fast, that these UH fifty basis point 127 00:07:22,080 --> 00:07:24,640 Speaker 1: hikes in the FED and even less in terms of 128 00:07:24,680 --> 00:07:27,600 Speaker 1: the UK and Japan and UH the e c B. 129 00:07:28,120 --> 00:07:31,040 Speaker 1: You know, then it produces the relative stasis. It doesn't 130 00:07:31,040 --> 00:07:33,640 Speaker 1: mean that rates don't move forward basis points on a morning. 131 00:07:34,120 --> 00:07:36,240 Speaker 1: It does mean that the ten here is bound within 132 00:07:36,280 --> 00:07:38,920 Speaker 1: a twenty plus or twenty range, and so al we 133 00:07:39,160 --> 00:07:43,119 Speaker 1: sell volatility around that and it produces a much higher yield. 134 00:07:43,240 --> 00:07:45,680 Speaker 1: I think people are surprised bill by how strong hiring 135 00:07:45,760 --> 00:07:48,560 Speaker 1: continues to be, given the fact that we have created 136 00:07:48,560 --> 00:07:50,720 Speaker 1: so many jobs for so long and the unemployment rate 137 00:07:50,840 --> 00:07:55,040 Speaker 1: is so low. The markets are gonna are the markets 138 00:07:55,040 --> 00:07:57,200 Speaker 1: going to have a tough time accepting the fact that 139 00:07:57,240 --> 00:07:59,400 Speaker 1: at some point we're going to slow down. But a 140 00:07:59,480 --> 00:08:04,240 Speaker 1: hundred feet two thousand jobs would still be a strong month, Well, 141 00:08:04,240 --> 00:08:07,400 Speaker 1: it would be. Let's face, The FED, though, is keen 142 00:08:07,520 --> 00:08:11,600 Speaker 1: on wages. They they focus on the labor and labor 143 00:08:11,680 --> 00:08:14,640 Speaker 1: conditions and to them, uh, you know, if if wages 144 00:08:14,680 --> 00:08:17,200 Speaker 1: get out of hand, then inflation will get a hand. 145 00:08:17,560 --> 00:08:20,040 Speaker 1: You know, we noticed this month, although there may be 146 00:08:20,160 --> 00:08:23,560 Speaker 1: a aberration, as you've noted the ten to fifteen minutes ago, 147 00:08:23,640 --> 00:08:28,160 Speaker 1: that the average hourly earnings went down from two five 148 00:08:28,240 --> 00:08:31,120 Speaker 1: to two point two percent on a annual y o 149 00:08:31,320 --> 00:08:34,800 Speaker 1: Y basis, And so you know, definitely wages are uh 150 00:08:34,880 --> 00:08:37,040 Speaker 1: and hourly earnings are not out of control. If you 151 00:08:37,520 --> 00:08:41,480 Speaker 1: factor in productivity props at one percent, then you know 152 00:08:41,600 --> 00:08:44,560 Speaker 1: you've got inflation in the one percent category. It seems 153 00:08:44,559 --> 00:08:48,920 Speaker 1: to me that the FED needs to focus on on 154 00:08:49,000 --> 00:08:53,960 Speaker 1: those conditions and know that two percent inflation, right is 155 00:08:54,160 --> 00:08:56,680 Speaker 1: perhaps a long way off. You know, the break evens 156 00:08:56,920 --> 00:08:59,920 Speaker 1: and the tips market almost worldwide, but let's stuff about 157 00:08:59,920 --> 00:09:03,959 Speaker 1: the US. Almost on all maturities from five to ten 158 00:09:04,120 --> 00:09:08,280 Speaker 1: to twenty to thirty years in maturity um, the break 159 00:09:08,400 --> 00:09:11,320 Speaker 1: even inflation rate is about one point four percent, which 160 00:09:11,320 --> 00:09:14,679 Speaker 1: means the market expects inflation for the next thirty years 161 00:09:14,720 --> 00:09:17,360 Speaker 1: to be one point four percent. And so why is 162 00:09:17,400 --> 00:09:21,160 Speaker 1: the FED so concerned about inflation when the market seem 163 00:09:21,240 --> 00:09:23,960 Speaker 1: to be telling it that everything's okay. Ordinarily you would 164 00:09:24,000 --> 00:09:27,719 Speaker 1: say go with the market. But if they're expecting that 165 00:09:27,800 --> 00:09:31,160 Speaker 1: kind of inflation for thirty years, somebody's got to be 166 00:09:31,520 --> 00:09:35,880 Speaker 1: wrong somewhere. Well, I think so, um, you know, to 167 00:09:35,960 --> 00:09:39,679 Speaker 1: my way of thinking, when the demographics kick in, when 168 00:09:39,679 --> 00:09:42,560 Speaker 1: the boomer is really good old and demand medical care 169 00:09:42,640 --> 00:09:47,600 Speaker 1: and stop spending money on consumption, and things will change dramatically, 170 00:09:47,600 --> 00:09:50,560 Speaker 1: and that to me means higher inflation. But at the moment, 171 00:09:50,679 --> 00:09:53,000 Speaker 1: the market doesn't see it that way. And certainly, to 172 00:09:53,080 --> 00:09:55,600 Speaker 1: be fair, you know, for the next five years or 173 00:09:55,640 --> 00:09:58,760 Speaker 1: the next two, three or four years, inflation seems well 174 00:09:58,840 --> 00:10:02,360 Speaker 1: under control. Unless I'm outities get a bid well being 175 00:10:02,400 --> 00:10:06,200 Speaker 1: the best example, going to fortify sixty dollars, you know, 176 00:10:06,280 --> 00:10:09,280 Speaker 1: unless that happens, than inflation is contained as we see 177 00:10:09,320 --> 00:10:12,520 Speaker 1: by you know, the wage numbers today. Bill, I want 178 00:10:12,520 --> 00:10:15,400 Speaker 1: to congratulate you on your latest note off Janna's Capital. 179 00:10:15,440 --> 00:10:17,560 Speaker 1: We always read them, we always like them. There's never 180 00:10:17,600 --> 00:10:21,320 Speaker 1: been a bad one. This one, folks, is extraordinary, and 181 00:10:21,360 --> 00:10:24,839 Speaker 1: it leads with the City Group chart, which drives me insane. 182 00:10:24,840 --> 00:10:27,360 Speaker 1: And I'm so glad Bill you did this. Christopher wander 183 00:10:27,440 --> 00:10:29,600 Speaker 1: Over here on Bloomberg Television. I'll put it out on 184 00:10:29,600 --> 00:10:33,120 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Radio plus City Group at forty two dollars a 185 00:10:33,200 --> 00:10:35,320 Speaker 1: share is a fiction that's after a ten to one 186 00:10:35,640 --> 00:10:38,120 Speaker 1: reverse split. Here we go up, we go to five 187 00:10:38,160 --> 00:10:40,760 Speaker 1: hundred dollars a share. Down, we go to forty two 188 00:10:40,760 --> 00:10:43,559 Speaker 1: dollars a share. You make a clear bill. You're worried 189 00:10:43,600 --> 00:10:48,040 Speaker 1: about permanent damage in our American banking system. Can you 190 00:10:48,160 --> 00:10:53,120 Speaker 1: support your former employee, Neil kesh Kari in reviewing are 191 00:10:53,160 --> 00:10:57,320 Speaker 1: too big to Fail banks? Well, my point wasn't exactly 192 00:10:57,400 --> 00:11:00,199 Speaker 1: Neil's point, but Neil has a point. You know, there 193 00:11:00,200 --> 00:11:02,720 Speaker 1: are banks that are too big to fail, and let's 194 00:11:03,160 --> 00:11:06,560 Speaker 1: make sure that we regulate them properly and that they 195 00:11:06,600 --> 00:11:10,640 Speaker 1: have sufficient capital. I think they have been recapitalizing and 196 00:11:10,679 --> 00:11:13,320 Speaker 1: they do have more capital than they had before. My point, 197 00:11:14,240 --> 00:11:18,559 Speaker 1: by showing City at five now at forty two, basically 198 00:11:18,600 --> 00:11:21,240 Speaker 1: said that many banks are are like that, not to 199 00:11:21,320 --> 00:11:25,000 Speaker 1: the same extreme, but certainly in Europe with Credit Suite 200 00:11:25,000 --> 00:11:29,320 Speaker 1: and Deutsche Bank. Their earnings power going forward, not not 201 00:11:29,480 --> 00:11:33,400 Speaker 1: the fact that they might be vulnerable to bankruptcy because 202 00:11:33,400 --> 00:11:36,199 Speaker 1: they're recapitalized, but their earnings power going forward is limited 203 00:11:36,240 --> 00:11:40,080 Speaker 1: because negative interest rates and because the yield curve appears 204 00:11:40,120 --> 00:11:43,079 Speaker 1: to be relatively flat and will continue to be flat 205 00:11:43,120 --> 00:11:46,000 Speaker 1: for a long time. That means their margins, their nimbs 206 00:11:46,280 --> 00:11:49,200 Speaker 1: will be limited. And it simply means to me that, well, 207 00:11:49,320 --> 00:11:51,679 Speaker 1: you know, banks are not of a bad investment, but 208 00:11:51,880 --> 00:11:53,760 Speaker 1: you know, let's face it, they're in a new age 209 00:11:53,800 --> 00:11:58,280 Speaker 1: with limited ability to increase earnings based upon this yield curve. 210 00:11:58,360 --> 00:12:00,960 Speaker 1: But Bill critically and Alan green Spend speaks of this, 211 00:12:01,120 --> 00:12:03,520 Speaker 1: You speak of this our David Weston and Bloomberg go 212 00:12:03,559 --> 00:12:07,040 Speaker 1: and pointed it out to me yesterday. Credit growth is 213 00:12:07,200 --> 00:12:10,600 Speaker 1: ramping up a little bit. Can you buy the idea 214 00:12:10,679 --> 00:12:13,720 Speaker 1: that that's a symbol of a recovering America or is 215 00:12:13,760 --> 00:12:19,160 Speaker 1: that credit growth within banking a fiction? No? And I 216 00:12:19,160 --> 00:12:21,680 Speaker 1: think we need it, and I think that's a critical element. 217 00:12:21,720 --> 00:12:24,520 Speaker 1: You know, I'm monitorist, you know, I'm uh, you know, 218 00:12:24,720 --> 00:12:28,199 Speaker 1: sort of stuck on a on a Hyman Minsky type 219 00:12:28,200 --> 00:12:32,360 Speaker 1: of model work. Credit feeds economic growth, that the two 220 00:12:32,400 --> 00:12:36,040 Speaker 1: are related. Our finance based economy depends on the perpetual 221 00:12:36,120 --> 00:12:38,959 Speaker 1: creation of more and more credit. And so yeah, the 222 00:12:39,400 --> 00:12:42,400 Speaker 1: rate is three to four percent, and now perhaps it 223 00:12:42,440 --> 00:12:45,880 Speaker 1: goes to five. I think in order to create a 224 00:12:46,080 --> 00:12:49,319 Speaker 1: nominal GDP growth of four, which is what the FED 225 00:12:49,440 --> 00:12:53,080 Speaker 1: wants to do, they need to create credit growth much 226 00:12:53,160 --> 00:12:56,840 Speaker 1: higher than that, because, uh, you know, it's been evident 227 00:12:56,920 --> 00:12:59,240 Speaker 1: in the past ten fifteen years that you need a 228 00:12:59,320 --> 00:13:02,840 Speaker 1: much higher of credit growth in order to stimulate a 229 00:13:02,840 --> 00:13:06,400 Speaker 1: certain amount of nominal GDP growth. And so it's getting better, 230 00:13:06,520 --> 00:13:09,120 Speaker 1: but it's still in the four percent area, and as 231 00:13:09,160 --> 00:13:12,120 Speaker 1: long as it stays there, it's underneath you know, the 232 00:13:12,200 --> 00:13:15,600 Speaker 1: cost of capital in the system, which is about six percent. 233 00:13:15,679 --> 00:13:20,360 Speaker 1: And if you can only grow nominal GDP by uh four, 234 00:13:20,640 --> 00:13:23,680 Speaker 1: if you can only grow credit by four percent with 235 00:13:23,760 --> 00:13:26,240 Speaker 1: the cost of capital and six then uh, you know, 236 00:13:26,320 --> 00:13:30,240 Speaker 1: nominal GDP suffers and you can't get out of the whole. 237 00:13:30,360 --> 00:13:33,320 Speaker 1: So credit growth is the key. You've got to find 238 00:13:33,360 --> 00:13:35,760 Speaker 1: some way for the private system to generate it. The 239 00:13:35,840 --> 00:13:39,240 Speaker 1: FED has done their duty in terms of lowering interest 240 00:13:39,320 --> 00:13:42,080 Speaker 1: rates and queuing all of that, but now the private 241 00:13:42,080 --> 00:13:45,359 Speaker 1: system needs to take debate. Some of it is occurring, 242 00:13:45,400 --> 00:13:51,360 Speaker 1: but I think leave much more. Bloomberg Surveillance weekday mornings 243 00:13:51,360 --> 00:13:54,240 Speaker 1: at seven Eastern in New York on Bloomberg Even three 244 00:13:54,320 --> 00:13:57,720 Speaker 1: oh in Boston M and nine four point five f 245 00:13:57,840 --> 00:14:01,400 Speaker 1: MHD two or on serious x M satellite radio channel 246 00:14:01,400 --> 00:14:09,559 Speaker 1: one nineteen h