WEBVTT - Market Volatility in 2025

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. This is the Bloomberg

0:00:13.840 --> 0:00:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Surveillance Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at seven am Eastern

0:00:18.200 --> 0:00:22.000
<v Speaker 1>on Apple CarPlay or Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App.

0:00:22.360 --> 0:00:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts, or watch

0:00:25.760 --> 0:00:27.040
<v Speaker 1>us live on YouTube.

0:00:27.240 --> 0:00:30.120
<v Speaker 2>Michael Wilson, thank you so much for joining this morning.

0:00:30.240 --> 0:00:33.400
<v Speaker 2>You called a new bullmarket and you say you have

0:00:33.520 --> 0:00:40.000
<v Speaker 2>a higher conviction into twenty twenty six. Why, yeah, thanks Tom.

0:00:40.240 --> 0:00:42.680
<v Speaker 3>I mean we talked about this in our midyear outlook

0:00:42.840 --> 0:00:45.600
<v Speaker 3>going back to May, which we felt like the April

0:00:45.600 --> 0:00:48.159
<v Speaker 3>lows would be a durable low for a lot of

0:00:48.159 --> 0:00:50.680
<v Speaker 3>different reasons. I'll try to go through them in no

0:00:50.760 --> 0:00:53.519
<v Speaker 3>specific order, but I mean, you know, we've had the

0:00:53.560 --> 0:00:55.200
<v Speaker 3>view coming into this year that it was going to

0:00:55.240 --> 0:00:57.920
<v Speaker 3>be a tough first half because earning provisions were coming

0:00:57.960 --> 0:01:02.040
<v Speaker 3>down pretty sharply for a lot of reasons, most notably

0:01:02.160 --> 0:01:05.880
<v Speaker 3>the AI CAPEC cycle was decelerating. We still had what

0:01:05.880 --> 0:01:08.840
<v Speaker 3>I would call a rolling recession in many industries that

0:01:08.880 --> 0:01:11.360
<v Speaker 3>were struggling, and the revisions were coming down. So what

0:01:11.400 --> 0:01:14.520
<v Speaker 3>tariffs did was it sort of culminated that that decline

0:01:14.640 --> 0:01:17.360
<v Speaker 3>into April, and as you know, I mean you've been

0:01:17.400 --> 0:01:20.120
<v Speaker 3>around the block like me. I mean, market's bottom on

0:01:20.319 --> 0:01:23.240
<v Speaker 3>bad news, okay, And so that I would have likened

0:01:23.240 --> 0:01:27.080
<v Speaker 3>the Liberation Day announcement to sort of a natural disaster

0:01:27.959 --> 0:01:32.000
<v Speaker 3>that basically, you know, capitulated, everybody capitulated. So that revision

0:01:32.000 --> 0:01:34.559
<v Speaker 3>of revision factors the main driver when I were bullish,

0:01:34.600 --> 0:01:36.840
<v Speaker 3>we think it's a bull market is the revision factors

0:01:36.840 --> 0:01:40.840
<v Speaker 3>for earnings are have shot higher. And you've seen our notes, Okay,

0:01:40.880 --> 0:01:44.480
<v Speaker 3>So like that's that is doesn't happen every year. That

0:01:45.280 --> 0:01:47.480
<v Speaker 3>is as extreme as we saw coming out of the

0:01:47.520 --> 0:01:51.040
<v Speaker 3>COVID lows in March of twenty twenty. Okay, it's as

0:01:51.200 --> 0:01:53.360
<v Speaker 3>extreme as we saw coming out of nine to eleven.

0:01:53.800 --> 0:01:56.560
<v Speaker 3>It looked like a recession. It walks like a recession,

0:01:56.600 --> 0:01:58.600
<v Speaker 3>a priced like a recession. So that's it.

0:01:59.040 --> 0:02:01.400
<v Speaker 2>Okay. This is a really critical question, folks. We all

0:02:01.480 --> 0:02:06.120
<v Speaker 2>understand the Trump legislation, the Beautiful Bill and all that

0:02:06.200 --> 0:02:09.000
<v Speaker 2>as some form of stimulus forward at least out one

0:02:09.080 --> 0:02:12.560
<v Speaker 2>two years, maybe three years. It Morgan standing, Mike Wilson.

0:02:12.600 --> 0:02:17.520
<v Speaker 2>The key question is the linkage of potential rate cuts

0:02:18.080 --> 0:02:21.440
<v Speaker 2>to equity enthusiasm. I don't have a straight answer on

0:02:21.480 --> 0:02:26.320
<v Speaker 2>that yet, can we link Powell, our future chairman, rate

0:02:26.360 --> 0:02:28.519
<v Speaker 2>cuts into an equity lift?

0:02:30.160 --> 0:02:32.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well, I think I mean, as usual, the markets

0:02:32.320 --> 0:02:34.760
<v Speaker 3>get ahead of this, and what the markets are anticipating now,

0:02:34.960 --> 0:02:36.920
<v Speaker 3>the bond market and the equity markets that the FED

0:02:36.960 --> 0:02:39.600
<v Speaker 3>will be cutting sometime in the next you know, two

0:02:39.680 --> 0:02:42.480
<v Speaker 3>to six months. And you know, even our house call,

0:02:42.560 --> 0:02:44.280
<v Speaker 3>I mean, our house calls for no cuts this year,

0:02:44.280 --> 0:02:46.160
<v Speaker 3>but then they have seven cuts next year. I mean,

0:02:46.160 --> 0:02:49.880
<v Speaker 3>that's like wildly bullish for equities. Okay, so you know

0:02:50.120 --> 0:02:52.799
<v Speaker 3>it's you almost have the perfect setup, Tom, because what

0:02:52.960 --> 0:02:55.920
<v Speaker 3>you have now is lagging economic data, which is what

0:02:55.960 --> 0:02:58.600
<v Speaker 3>the FED uses to make decisions, and you have you

0:02:58.639 --> 0:03:00.880
<v Speaker 3>already had the equity market in our divisions telling you

0:03:00.919 --> 0:03:03.880
<v Speaker 3>what's going to happen. So you know, they're looking backwards

0:03:03.880 --> 0:03:06.040
<v Speaker 3>and they're going to be looking at lagging labor data,

0:03:06.280 --> 0:03:08.359
<v Speaker 3>you know, and then of course lagging inflation data, which

0:03:08.360 --> 0:03:11.080
<v Speaker 3>should come down ultimately later this year next year, and

0:03:11.080 --> 0:03:13.240
<v Speaker 3>they're going to cut into that and but the but

0:03:13.360 --> 0:03:14.960
<v Speaker 3>you know, there's not going to be a knock on

0:03:15.160 --> 0:03:17.800
<v Speaker 3>negative effect for earning revisions in the way that people

0:03:18.160 --> 0:03:21.040
<v Speaker 3>kind of assume when you get that sort of decline

0:03:21.160 --> 0:03:23.520
<v Speaker 3>in labor data. In fact, I would argue because it's

0:03:23.560 --> 0:03:26.320
<v Speaker 3>gradual that we're going to see revisions go up, because

0:03:26.400 --> 0:03:30.400
<v Speaker 3>you know, when companies reduce headcount, it actually accrues to margins.

0:03:31.400 --> 0:03:35.120
<v Speaker 4>Mike, what what is screening well for you? Now? I'm

0:03:35.160 --> 0:03:37.200
<v Speaker 4>not sure if it's sectors that you guys screened by

0:03:37.320 --> 0:03:40.520
<v Speaker 4>or different factors that you screen by. How are you

0:03:40.600 --> 0:03:43.760
<v Speaker 4>looking at this market and maybe where opportunities might be right,

0:03:43.800 --> 0:03:44.720
<v Speaker 4>So we do both.

0:03:44.800 --> 0:03:48.280
<v Speaker 3>We look at factor revisions, we look at sector industry revisions,

0:03:48.320 --> 0:03:49.840
<v Speaker 3>and we look at the stock level too. It works

0:03:49.880 --> 0:03:53.200
<v Speaker 3>in all those areas, and so we've been rightly positioned,

0:03:53.680 --> 0:03:58.240
<v Speaker 3>really since April to be overweight financials industrials. Those are

0:03:58.240 --> 0:04:02.000
<v Speaker 3>the two favorites, and also software to some degree, and

0:04:02.040 --> 0:04:03.680
<v Speaker 3>those have been the areas where the revisions have been

0:04:03.720 --> 0:04:06.920
<v Speaker 3>the strongest, and I think that probably could continue. And

0:04:07.000 --> 0:04:09.400
<v Speaker 3>so at the end of the day, I do think

0:04:09.400 --> 0:04:11.840
<v Speaker 3>the biggest opportunity going forward is the areas that have

0:04:11.960 --> 0:04:14.240
<v Speaker 3>not seen those revisions yet. So let's talk about the

0:04:14.280 --> 0:04:17.320
<v Speaker 3>industries where we've been sort of in this rolling recession.

0:04:17.360 --> 0:04:21.880
<v Speaker 3>Housing related, okay, commodity related, some of the consumer goods

0:04:21.920 --> 0:04:24.000
<v Speaker 3>areas which are going to feel the effects of terrors now.

0:04:24.040 --> 0:04:25.880
<v Speaker 3>So in the very short term, we actually think revision

0:04:25.880 --> 0:04:28.279
<v Speaker 3>breath could come down a bit as some of these

0:04:28.839 --> 0:04:31.159
<v Speaker 3>terrorts flow through to cost of good soul. But that's

0:04:31.200 --> 0:04:34.080
<v Speaker 3>just going to create the next buying opportunity, perhaps in

0:04:34.160 --> 0:04:36.440
<v Speaker 3>these areas that are lagged, even small casts, because they

0:04:36.440 --> 0:04:39.040
<v Speaker 3>will love the fact that that's cutting rates at some point.

0:04:39.920 --> 0:04:42.479
<v Speaker 4>Mike, one of the themes today and really for the

0:04:42.520 --> 0:04:46.280
<v Speaker 4>last period of time has been concentration risk. In this marketplace,

0:04:46.279 --> 0:04:48.520
<v Speaker 4>it seems like only a handful of stocks are driving

0:04:48.520 --> 0:04:51.680
<v Speaker 4>the performance. But I think what we're kind of coming

0:04:52.040 --> 0:04:54.680
<v Speaker 4>to the conclusion of our at least rationalizing is because

0:04:54.680 --> 0:04:56.479
<v Speaker 4>that's where the earnest growth is, that's where the free

0:04:56.520 --> 0:05:00.160
<v Speaker 4>cash flow is. How do you think about that issue?

0:05:00.279 --> 0:05:02.960
<v Speaker 3>You're exactly right. I mean, the market's not stupid. I mean,

0:05:03.000 --> 0:05:06.040
<v Speaker 3>like the first of all, what drove the market lower

0:05:06.400 --> 0:05:08.800
<v Speaker 3>in the first quarter the MAG seven You know why,

0:05:08.880 --> 0:05:10.880
<v Speaker 3>because the MAG seven range divisions were terrible. In the

0:05:10.880 --> 0:05:13.800
<v Speaker 3>first quarter, we had an AI camp BAX acceleration. We

0:05:13.839 --> 0:05:16.840
<v Speaker 3>had questions around whether it's going to generate ROI revenue

0:05:16.880 --> 0:05:19.440
<v Speaker 3>growth kind of decelerated a bit, so you know, it

0:05:19.760 --> 0:05:23.640
<v Speaker 3>happened for a reason, but has nothing to do with teriffs, okay.

0:05:23.920 --> 0:05:26.320
<v Speaker 3>It has everything to do which is the natural evolution

0:05:26.400 --> 0:05:29.200
<v Speaker 3>of this AI cycle that's going on. So I think,

0:05:29.240 --> 0:05:31.920
<v Speaker 3>you know, coming out of the April lows, the reason

0:05:31.960 --> 0:05:34.280
<v Speaker 3>why the MAG seven led is well, hey, they're big

0:05:34.320 --> 0:05:37.480
<v Speaker 3>and liquid, everybody loves them. But also because they were

0:05:37.520 --> 0:05:40.520
<v Speaker 3>seeing a rate of change bottom in the revision factors.

0:05:40.560 --> 0:05:44.279
<v Speaker 3>I'll give you two huge catalysts for that. The weaker dollar, okay,

0:05:44.320 --> 0:05:47.440
<v Speaker 3>which accrues to the large multinationals, particularly some of the

0:05:47.440 --> 0:05:51.080
<v Speaker 3>MAGS seven. And the second one was that we saw

0:05:51.120 --> 0:05:54.200
<v Speaker 3>that you know, U Vidio could no longer sell they

0:05:54.200 --> 0:05:56.520
<v Speaker 3>could sell, they could no longer sell chips to China,

0:05:56.560 --> 0:05:59.120
<v Speaker 3>and they took a big write down on inventory. But

0:05:59.200 --> 0:06:01.000
<v Speaker 3>now they can sell those chips when the inventory is

0:06:01.040 --> 0:06:03.520
<v Speaker 3>at well. So what does that tell you? Gross margins

0:06:03.520 --> 0:06:06.120
<v Speaker 3>are going to be basically manufactured for the next year.

0:06:06.160 --> 0:06:09.120
<v Speaker 3>So there's a lot of reasons, you know, why stocks

0:06:09.120 --> 0:06:11.000
<v Speaker 3>do what they do. But the main reason we for

0:06:11.120 --> 0:06:14.839
<v Speaker 3>our whole franchise, as you know, focuses on earnings, not

0:06:15.240 --> 0:06:16.560
<v Speaker 3>lagging economic data.

0:06:17.360 --> 0:06:20.240
<v Speaker 2>Mike Wilson with us across your commute this morning across

0:06:20.279 --> 0:06:22.440
<v Speaker 2>the nation, I should say on YouTube as well in

0:06:22.520 --> 0:06:26.160
<v Speaker 2>the office and of course at home YouTube subscribe to

0:06:26.200 --> 0:06:28.640
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Podcast growing each and every day. Should I do

0:06:28.680 --> 0:06:31.520
<v Speaker 2>a shout out right now for Joe Wisenthal, Tracy Alloy

0:06:31.640 --> 0:06:33.640
<v Speaker 2>killing it number one on Apple?

0:06:33.920 --> 0:06:36.080
<v Speaker 4>Yesterday's phenomenal had a great write up in the New

0:06:36.160 --> 0:06:37.359
<v Speaker 4>York Times, so they did double.

0:06:37.240 --> 0:06:39.520
<v Speaker 2>Days and you know they'll be with us Jackson Hole,

0:06:39.600 --> 0:06:42.840
<v Speaker 2>So maybe I'll get you know, maybe they're entourage. You'll

0:06:42.880 --> 0:06:44.880
<v Speaker 2>let me speak to them. We'll have to see Mike

0:06:44.920 --> 0:06:47.760
<v Speaker 2>Wilson with us. With Morgan Stanley, Mike, how do you

0:06:47.920 --> 0:06:53.840
<v Speaker 2>use your analysts work? Mister Weiss covers Microsoft just as

0:06:53.880 --> 0:06:56.719
<v Speaker 2>you know, do you speak to these people or how

0:06:56.720 --> 0:07:01.560
<v Speaker 2>do you use the securities analysis of Morgan Stanley.

0:07:02.800 --> 0:07:06.440
<v Speaker 3>Percent We're a micro macro franchise man. I started my

0:07:06.520 --> 0:07:08.640
<v Speaker 3>career in the stock business, you know, I used to

0:07:08.640 --> 0:07:11.720
<v Speaker 3>be a TMT specialist as a desk analyst, you know,

0:07:11.800 --> 0:07:14.880
<v Speaker 3>following bottoms up, and so I obviously know these folks

0:07:14.880 --> 0:07:16.360
<v Speaker 3>have been here for thirty five years. I know all

0:07:16.400 --> 0:07:18.400
<v Speaker 3>of them well, I've worked with all of them, and

0:07:18.480 --> 0:07:20.880
<v Speaker 3>so we every month we hold a call that we

0:07:20.960 --> 0:07:23.880
<v Speaker 3>basically call it the micro macro matchup, where we basically

0:07:24.120 --> 0:07:26.080
<v Speaker 3>kind of talk about our views from a macro standpoint.

0:07:26.120 --> 0:07:27.600
<v Speaker 3>Then we talk to the analysts and say, well, what

0:07:27.640 --> 0:07:29.360
<v Speaker 3>are you guys hearing? What are you doing? You know

0:07:29.600 --> 0:07:32.480
<v Speaker 3>how you how are your numbers may be adjusting, and

0:07:32.480 --> 0:07:35.200
<v Speaker 3>that informs us just like our analysis does from a

0:07:35.200 --> 0:07:38.320
<v Speaker 3>top down perspective. So the marring of the micro macro,

0:07:38.400 --> 0:07:40.280
<v Speaker 3>I think keeps us a step ahead of most people.

0:07:40.480 --> 0:07:42.720
<v Speaker 3>People can criticize us for various things, but they can't

0:07:42.720 --> 0:07:46.160
<v Speaker 3>criticize us for I think we have done a better

0:07:46.280 --> 0:07:48.280
<v Speaker 3>job of most of being in the right places within

0:07:48.320 --> 0:07:51.760
<v Speaker 3>the equity market because of that micro macro marriage.

0:07:51.920 --> 0:07:54.280
<v Speaker 2>So so delv here now in to say, I see

0:07:54.360 --> 0:07:58.240
<v Speaker 2>MIT Sloan, I see Caltech, this whole cottage industry, including

0:07:58.240 --> 0:08:03.240
<v Speaker 2>the University of Michigan and Arburg doing AI? Learn about AI?

0:08:04.200 --> 0:08:08.920
<v Speaker 2>Morgan Stanley, what is the next three months, six months?

0:08:09.480 --> 0:08:14.280
<v Speaker 2>Zeitgeist on AI? The momentum of it? Yeah?

0:08:14.280 --> 0:08:15.720
<v Speaker 3>Well, here again we have a pretty I have an

0:08:15.720 --> 0:08:18.320
<v Speaker 3>advantage because we have some analysts who are not only

0:08:19.080 --> 0:08:20.560
<v Speaker 3>you know, very good in this space, and they have

0:08:20.600 --> 0:08:22.680
<v Speaker 3>long tenure, like a lot of our tech analysts have

0:08:22.680 --> 0:08:24.960
<v Speaker 3>been in the seat for ten to twenty years as

0:08:25.000 --> 0:08:28.280
<v Speaker 3>we have continuity there, but the zeitgeist here is essentially

0:08:28.600 --> 0:08:31.080
<v Speaker 3>now into the adoption phase. We've written a lot about this,

0:08:31.160 --> 0:08:33.400
<v Speaker 3>which is that you know these tech cycles, you know,

0:08:33.480 --> 0:08:36.280
<v Speaker 3>there's there's basically an enabler phase where you have a

0:08:36.280 --> 0:08:39.160
<v Speaker 3>build out and the enablers benefit from that build out,

0:08:39.480 --> 0:08:42.680
<v Speaker 3>and then the technology gets adopted by the early adopters.

0:08:42.679 --> 0:08:45.200
<v Speaker 3>We're seeing that mainly by the hyperscalers quite frankly, because

0:08:45.240 --> 0:08:47.480
<v Speaker 3>they're very fast with the big data sets. And then

0:08:47.559 --> 0:08:49.079
<v Speaker 3>ultimately what we think is going to happen to the

0:08:49.080 --> 0:08:52.360
<v Speaker 3>application layers being built now that will then be basically

0:08:52.360 --> 0:08:55.600
<v Speaker 3>diffused out into the broader economy. And so that's where

0:08:55.600 --> 0:08:57.680
<v Speaker 3>it gets really exciting. That's sort of the you know

0:08:57.679 --> 0:08:59.760
<v Speaker 3>the Internet. When the Internet got exciting is when it

0:08:59.760 --> 0:09:04.400
<v Speaker 3>starts to make everyday businesses more productive. So we have screens,

0:09:04.440 --> 0:09:06.079
<v Speaker 3>we have lists, we've been publishing on this for.

0:09:06.080 --> 0:09:06.680
<v Speaker 2>Quite a while.

0:09:07.040 --> 0:09:11.040
<v Speaker 3>Those AI adopter stocks are massively outperforming, they have been.

0:09:11.320 --> 0:09:13.480
<v Speaker 3>The market knows this. I think we've been ahead of

0:09:13.480 --> 0:09:15.240
<v Speaker 3>that curve, and that's what we're saying, that's what we're

0:09:15.280 --> 0:09:17.320
<v Speaker 3>looking for for the next twelve months is that this

0:09:17.360 --> 0:09:18.880
<v Speaker 3>is where we're going to start to finally see some

0:09:18.880 --> 0:09:22.480
<v Speaker 3>of the productivity benefits diffused across the broader economy. It

0:09:22.480 --> 0:09:25.040
<v Speaker 3>won't be a straight line. There'll be doubts and fears

0:09:25.080 --> 0:09:27.679
<v Speaker 3>and uncertainty, but it's a very positive story for the

0:09:27.720 --> 0:09:31.319
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty six earning story. And this is why stocks

0:09:31.360 --> 0:09:34.000
<v Speaker 3>are not as expensive as people think, because you know,

0:09:34.040 --> 0:09:35.560
<v Speaker 3>the market figured this out just.

0:09:35.440 --> 0:09:35.920
<v Speaker 2>Like we did.

0:09:35.960 --> 0:09:37.480
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you know, if we can figure it out, definitely,

0:09:37.480 --> 0:09:39.440
<v Speaker 3>the market figured it out that we're going to see

0:09:39.480 --> 0:09:42.880
<v Speaker 3>positive revisions lead to better earnings growth next year. Okay,

0:09:42.880 --> 0:09:44.760
<v Speaker 3>and I think you know the economic data is backward

0:09:44.800 --> 0:09:45.880
<v Speaker 3>looking and it just doesn't tell that.

0:09:45.880 --> 0:09:49.400
<v Speaker 2>Stor denominator Paul comes up. Yeah, that's the whole thing. Yeah,

0:09:49.440 --> 0:09:50.800
<v Speaker 2>it's amazing, Hey, Mike.

0:09:51.000 --> 0:09:53.600
<v Speaker 4>In your research note, you're right, since the loads in April,

0:09:53.640 --> 0:09:56.520
<v Speaker 4>the rally in stocks has been relentless.

0:09:56.040 --> 0:09:57.479
<v Speaker 2>With no tradable pullbacks.

0:09:57.920 --> 0:10:01.240
<v Speaker 4>What creates a pause and a bull market where you

0:10:01.240 --> 0:10:03.040
<v Speaker 4>can maybe catch up a little bit.

0:10:04.160 --> 0:10:05.880
<v Speaker 3>Well, we try to lay that out in our note

0:10:05.880 --> 0:10:06.240
<v Speaker 3>this week.

0:10:06.360 --> 0:10:07.160
<v Speaker 2>Right, it's just.

0:10:07.080 --> 0:10:09.880
<v Speaker 3>Because we want to be well balanced here, but I

0:10:09.920 --> 0:10:12.480
<v Speaker 3>want to go back and you know, that comment about

0:10:12.480 --> 0:10:14.680
<v Speaker 3>the market being relentless and straight up in no pullbacks,

0:10:14.960 --> 0:10:18.760
<v Speaker 3>that are those are the characteristics of a new ball market.

0:10:18.960 --> 0:10:21.520
<v Speaker 3>That's what happens, and that's what looks like. This looks

0:10:21.559 --> 0:10:24.920
<v Speaker 3>exactly like April, May, June, July twenty twenty. In fact,

0:10:24.920 --> 0:10:27.720
<v Speaker 3>it's following a similar pattern. So I think that the

0:10:27.760 --> 0:10:30.120
<v Speaker 3>things that could get us a consolidation in the third quarter,

0:10:30.160 --> 0:10:32.319
<v Speaker 3>which we did start writing about, you know, a couple

0:10:32.360 --> 0:10:34.199
<v Speaker 3>of weeks ago, we said there's going to be a pullback,

0:10:34.200 --> 0:10:35.679
<v Speaker 3>it's going to be during a third quarter. We do

0:10:35.720 --> 0:10:37.719
<v Speaker 3>want to win, but we do think there's three or

0:10:37.760 --> 0:10:41.240
<v Speaker 3>four potential drivers. And at number one, revision factors could

0:10:41.240 --> 0:10:43.680
<v Speaker 3>come down as the terror start to flow through, the

0:10:43.679 --> 0:10:45.760
<v Speaker 3>cost of good soul, right, the more expensive inventory starts

0:10:45.760 --> 0:10:48.040
<v Speaker 3>to flow through, and some companies will have margin pressure

0:10:48.040 --> 0:10:50.360
<v Speaker 3>with that, or there'll be some demand destruction. That's one.

0:10:50.600 --> 0:10:52.200
<v Speaker 3>I think. Number two is we know there's a trendspmens

0:10:52.280 --> 0:10:55.680
<v Speaker 3>supply coming on the treasury issue inside, maybe the term

0:10:55.720 --> 0:10:57.839
<v Speaker 3>premium kind of pushes out again and we get a

0:10:57.920 --> 0:11:00.400
<v Speaker 3>backup in long rates. You know, the market now is

0:11:00.480 --> 0:11:03.959
<v Speaker 3>negatively correlated to rate at this point, So that's another

0:11:04.000 --> 0:11:06.240
<v Speaker 3>potential driver. And I think the one that is not

0:11:06.320 --> 0:11:08.840
<v Speaker 3>so obvious but has been a big driver of the

0:11:08.840 --> 0:11:12.199
<v Speaker 3>bull market in the New Bowl market is the dollar weakness.

0:11:12.320 --> 0:11:15.240
<v Speaker 3>So dollar weakness has not only translated to better earnings

0:11:15.240 --> 0:11:19.880
<v Speaker 3>growth for the multinationals, it's also added an incredible amount

0:11:19.920 --> 0:11:22.120
<v Speaker 3>of liquidity to the tune of about eight trillion US

0:11:22.200 --> 0:11:24.400
<v Speaker 3>dollars to global money supply. So if the dollar would

0:11:24.440 --> 0:11:27.439
<v Speaker 3>strengthen here five six seventy eight percent, that could lead

0:11:27.440 --> 0:11:30.079
<v Speaker 3>to a liquidity drain of some kind and a.

0:11:30.000 --> 0:11:33.760
<v Speaker 2>Pullback of interesting fast I should point out mister Wilson

0:11:33.800 --> 0:11:37.680
<v Speaker 2>talks about the lift off of twenty twenty that was

0:11:37.800 --> 0:11:41.760
<v Speaker 2>precisely one hundred percent in twenty two months out to

0:11:41.800 --> 0:11:44.360
<v Speaker 2>the end of twenty twenty one. Was the first leg

0:11:44.880 --> 0:11:48.199
<v Speaker 2>of that lift. Absolutely extraordinary, Mike Wilson. I got to

0:11:48.240 --> 0:11:49.920
<v Speaker 2>go to one of the dogs. I noticed it on

0:11:49.960 --> 0:11:54.320
<v Speaker 2>the WEI screen today. Health, I mean, is it health

0:11:54.400 --> 0:11:58.880
<v Speaker 2>of value trap? How does Morgan Stanley consider purchase of

0:11:59.000 --> 0:12:00.119
<v Speaker 2>health equity?

0:12:01.360 --> 0:12:04.280
<v Speaker 3>Well, it has been one of the worst performing consistently sectors.

0:12:04.320 --> 0:12:06.959
<v Speaker 3>Even when the market was somewhat defensive in the first quarter,

0:12:07.000 --> 0:12:09.240
<v Speaker 3>it didn't really do its job. And I think we

0:12:09.240 --> 0:12:11.599
<v Speaker 3>could attribute this to a couple of different things. I

0:12:11.679 --> 0:12:14.360
<v Speaker 3>would say, most notably, we have a new obviously head

0:12:14.360 --> 0:12:17.280
<v Speaker 3>of the HHS, Robert Kennedy Junior, who you know, has

0:12:17.320 --> 0:12:19.679
<v Speaker 3>been I would say quiet so far on what his

0:12:19.960 --> 0:12:22.080
<v Speaker 3>main initiatives are going to be. And I think there's

0:12:22.080 --> 0:12:24.160
<v Speaker 3>just sort of sort of some fear there that maybe

0:12:24.240 --> 0:12:27.080
<v Speaker 3>it's going to be draconian and in terms of like

0:12:27.120 --> 0:12:28.960
<v Speaker 3>for farmer companies and some of the some of the

0:12:28.960 --> 0:12:31.840
<v Speaker 3>device some of the device companies and even the insurance companies.

0:12:32.280 --> 0:12:33.920
<v Speaker 3>And I think, you know, it could be this simple

0:12:33.960 --> 0:12:37.240
<v Speaker 3>time is that once once RFK Junior and the HHS

0:12:37.320 --> 0:12:38.920
<v Speaker 3>roll out what they're going to do, I think they've

0:12:38.960 --> 0:12:41.560
<v Speaker 3>they've said September they're going to be done with some

0:12:41.559 --> 0:12:44.440
<v Speaker 3>of their studies, it could just be a sigh of relief.

0:12:44.960 --> 0:12:47.480
<v Speaker 3>Maybe that's the catalyst here, But I mean, we're not

0:12:47.520 --> 0:12:49.320
<v Speaker 3>going to probably upgrade the group until we see at

0:12:49.400 --> 0:12:51.880
<v Speaker 3>least a bottoming out of relative range breath. We're just

0:12:51.880 --> 0:12:54.120
<v Speaker 3>not seeing that, and so there's no need to go there.

0:12:54.120 --> 0:12:54.960
<v Speaker 3>There's other things to do.

0:12:55.800 --> 0:12:59.400
<v Speaker 2>Paul, I get good news, I'll check the schedule. Duke

0:12:59.440 --> 0:13:02.080
<v Speaker 2>does not have privileged to lose to Michigan this year

0:13:02.120 --> 0:13:06.200
<v Speaker 2>in football. It's a constructive first step well for Duke

0:13:06.640 --> 0:13:12.800
<v Speaker 2>Mike Wilson, thank you so much. With Morgan Stanley.

0:13:15.080 --> 0:13:18.680
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Catch us live

0:13:18.760 --> 0:13:21.920
<v Speaker 1>weekday afternoons from seven to ten am Eastern Listen on

0:13:22.000 --> 0:13:25.640
<v Speaker 1>Applecarplay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app, or

0:13:25.800 --> 0:13:27.640
<v Speaker 1>watch US live on YouTube.

0:13:27.400 --> 0:13:31.600
<v Speaker 2>And Stishamorosa with the Snow with Partners Group David Layton

0:13:31.640 --> 0:13:35.640
<v Speaker 2>and running the charge their Partners Group of course doing

0:13:35.679 --> 0:13:40.400
<v Speaker 2>a lot, particularly more out West in Switzerland as well.

0:13:41.200 --> 0:13:44.000
<v Speaker 2>You're still based in New York, right, Yeah, Partners has

0:13:44.040 --> 0:13:46.199
<v Speaker 2>a huge international perspective.

0:13:46.400 --> 0:13:46.760
<v Speaker 5>That's right.

0:13:46.840 --> 0:13:49.680
<v Speaker 6>We're global private markets firm. I've been around since nineteen

0:13:49.720 --> 0:13:53.400
<v Speaker 6>ninety six. Zooke is the headquarters. Denver's the US Zuke

0:13:53.520 --> 0:13:56.120
<v Speaker 6>that's how you pronounce it, zuk, Yes, outside of Zurich

0:13:56.400 --> 0:13:59.559
<v Speaker 6>and also in Denver as well, but also a really

0:13:59.600 --> 0:14:01.480
<v Speaker 6>big price and it's in New York as very could.

0:14:01.600 --> 0:14:06.160
<v Speaker 2>Thrilled to have you back with this level of MROs

0:14:05.920 --> 0:14:08.840
<v Speaker 2>of courage to stay in the market at different points.

0:14:09.280 --> 0:14:11.760
<v Speaker 2>Is you feel that way right now where people there's

0:14:11.760 --> 0:14:15.000
<v Speaker 2>so much geopolitical nervousness and all, and you're just saying,

0:14:15.040 --> 0:14:16.840
<v Speaker 2>fight the good fight and stay in the market.

0:14:17.200 --> 0:14:20.320
<v Speaker 6>Well, you know, Tom, one of the probably the best

0:14:20.320 --> 0:14:24.120
<v Speaker 6>perspectives I've gotten, you know, through kind of my investment tenures,

0:14:24.440 --> 0:14:27.800
<v Speaker 6>thinking about themes and think about the megatredza really change

0:14:27.800 --> 0:14:29.440
<v Speaker 6>and shape the world figures to come. And if you

0:14:29.480 --> 0:14:32.000
<v Speaker 6>align yourself with those and if you focus on what

0:14:32.080 --> 0:14:35.960
<v Speaker 6>actually drives earnings or what drives profitability, it's focusing on

0:14:36.000 --> 0:14:39.760
<v Speaker 6>things like artificial intelligence or digital transformation, or healthcare innovation

0:14:40.200 --> 0:14:43.120
<v Speaker 6>or you know, new ways of living. So that's what

0:14:43.320 --> 0:14:45.880
<v Speaker 6>sort of gives you the courage to stay through the

0:14:45.920 --> 0:14:48.560
<v Speaker 6>next rate cut or rate hike or not, or through

0:14:48.600 --> 0:14:51.600
<v Speaker 6>the next inflation report if you invest in the right

0:14:51.760 --> 0:14:54.760
<v Speaker 6>kinds of companies in order to benefit from that innovation

0:14:54.840 --> 0:14:55.320
<v Speaker 6>over time.

0:14:56.920 --> 0:14:59.880
<v Speaker 4>One of the big themes that we've i guess become

0:15:00.120 --> 0:15:02.520
<v Speaker 4>more accustoms over the last six months twelve months has

0:15:02.560 --> 0:15:09.560
<v Speaker 4>been maybe this onshoing, reassuring, this reduced sense of internationalism.

0:15:09.640 --> 0:15:11.120
<v Speaker 4>And for a company like yours that it is a

0:15:11.160 --> 0:15:13.200
<v Speaker 4>global company in Zurich and in the US and all

0:15:13.240 --> 0:15:15.240
<v Speaker 4>over the world, how do you guys think about the

0:15:15.320 --> 0:15:19.160
<v Speaker 4>fact that this may be a less global economy than

0:15:19.200 --> 0:15:21.080
<v Speaker 4>it was one, two, three, five years ago.

0:15:22.120 --> 0:15:25.440
<v Speaker 6>You know, I don't know if that is a completely

0:15:25.560 --> 0:15:28.720
<v Speaker 6>right assumption to make that this is a less global economy.

0:15:28.840 --> 0:15:32.720
<v Speaker 6>I don't think the objective is really to sever all

0:15:32.880 --> 0:15:36.040
<v Speaker 6>trade ties. I think the objective is really to rethink

0:15:36.200 --> 0:15:38.680
<v Speaker 6>the trade going forward and also to sort of set

0:15:38.720 --> 0:15:41.280
<v Speaker 6>out new rules of how the trade is going to

0:15:41.320 --> 0:15:45.000
<v Speaker 6>be done. So, if that's the base case scenario, as investors,

0:15:45.040 --> 0:15:48.080
<v Speaker 6>we have to think about how to corporations, how to consumers,

0:15:48.120 --> 0:15:50.520
<v Speaker 6>how do we want to adjust to that? And you know,

0:15:50.640 --> 0:15:52.840
<v Speaker 6>speaking of adjustment, this is why I call this a

0:15:52.960 --> 0:15:55.680
<v Speaker 6>quarter of adjustment. This is the time where companies are

0:15:55.680 --> 0:15:58.760
<v Speaker 6>going to decide whether they're going to pass through the

0:15:58.840 --> 0:16:01.120
<v Speaker 6>tariff cost to the consumer. Where they going to do?

0:16:01.320 --> 0:16:02.840
<v Speaker 2>What do you see there? What's your update?

0:16:03.800 --> 0:16:06.800
<v Speaker 6>We see a combination. I think the vast majority of companies,

0:16:06.800 --> 0:16:09.760
<v Speaker 6>about seventy five percent of companies are saying that they're

0:16:09.760 --> 0:16:12.400
<v Speaker 6>going to pass through the cost of the consumer. Maybe

0:16:12.400 --> 0:16:14.520
<v Speaker 6>only twenty five percent of those say it's one hundred

0:16:14.560 --> 0:16:18.000
<v Speaker 6>percent of the pass through. Some of it will be

0:16:18.040 --> 0:16:20.280
<v Speaker 6>absorbed by the profit margin, which is near a record.

0:16:20.360 --> 0:16:23.760
<v Speaker 2>Anna stj Morosa with this partners Group, and again thank

0:16:23.800 --> 0:16:26.040
<v Speaker 2>you for joining us on You're commute this morning across

0:16:26.080 --> 0:16:29.840
<v Speaker 2>the nation in the office at home in Zoos, Switzerland.

0:16:30.080 --> 0:16:33.680
<v Speaker 2>YouTube is the way our new distribution has subscribed to

0:16:33.720 --> 0:16:38.720
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Podcasts. We protect the copyright of all of our research.

0:16:39.200 --> 0:16:42.480
<v Speaker 2>They email and send us am Anastage's note no get

0:16:42.480 --> 0:16:45.000
<v Speaker 2>it from partners Group. I love how you say this

0:16:45.720 --> 0:16:51.080
<v Speaker 2>focus on what you can control. Describe that for equity

0:16:51.120 --> 0:16:52.560
<v Speaker 2>market investments right right now.

0:16:52.680 --> 0:16:55.280
<v Speaker 6>Well, the first thing you can control is the kinds

0:16:55.280 --> 0:16:58.120
<v Speaker 6>of companies you invest in, and what are the profit margins,

0:16:58.160 --> 0:17:00.400
<v Speaker 6>What is the starting point for those profit margins, and

0:17:00.440 --> 0:17:02.560
<v Speaker 6>what is the endpoint what you're trying to achieve. So

0:17:02.640 --> 0:17:06.320
<v Speaker 6>one thing we can control is actually growing that profitability

0:17:06.320 --> 0:17:09.879
<v Speaker 6>and growing the profit margin. You know, it's driving operational efficiencies,

0:17:09.960 --> 0:17:14.000
<v Speaker 6>it's perhaps infusing AI, machine learning and other productivity tools

0:17:14.000 --> 0:17:18.040
<v Speaker 6>to grow those margins. It's building platforms rather than you know,

0:17:18.200 --> 0:17:20.760
<v Speaker 6>let's say one product business. So that's one thing you

0:17:20.760 --> 0:17:22.919
<v Speaker 6>can control. You know. The other thing you can control

0:17:22.960 --> 0:17:25.880
<v Speaker 6>is you can pivot into the sectors where you do

0:17:26.119 --> 0:17:29.760
<v Speaker 6>naturally have faster earning growth because it is not a

0:17:29.920 --> 0:17:32.040
<v Speaker 6>company that's aligned with the old economy, but it's a

0:17:32.040 --> 0:17:35.439
<v Speaker 6>company that's aligned with a new economy. So that's why

0:17:35.480 --> 0:17:38.000
<v Speaker 6>we do look to things like data centers. That's why

0:17:38.040 --> 0:17:41.280
<v Speaker 6>we do look to the build out of the energy

0:17:41.320 --> 0:17:44.320
<v Speaker 6>production as well. So those are the things you can control.

0:17:44.440 --> 0:17:47.639
<v Speaker 6>You can control leverage, how much do you use, and

0:17:47.920 --> 0:17:50.560
<v Speaker 6>how do you know pull that lever based on what

0:17:50.600 --> 0:17:52.879
<v Speaker 6>interest rates are. So those are some of the main.

0:17:52.760 --> 0:17:57.359
<v Speaker 4>Things outside of tech, which is obviously driving this market.

0:17:57.400 --> 0:18:00.760
<v Speaker 4>Are there areas outside of technology that you guys find interesting?

0:18:02.000 --> 0:18:05.159
<v Speaker 6>Yes, you know, I think one of the misnomers in

0:18:05.200 --> 0:18:07.480
<v Speaker 6>the markets right now is that just because there's not

0:18:07.600 --> 0:18:11.160
<v Speaker 6>a big focus on sustainability from the current US administration,

0:18:11.320 --> 0:18:13.440
<v Speaker 6>and this is not a theme that's going to be there.

0:18:14.000 --> 0:18:16.480
<v Speaker 6>And you know, I very much think that sustainability is

0:18:16.520 --> 0:18:18.720
<v Speaker 6>a theme that's going to is here to stay because

0:18:18.720 --> 0:18:20.760
<v Speaker 6>it's really about how can we be the most efficient

0:18:20.800 --> 0:18:23.320
<v Speaker 6>with our natural resources, minimize the damage to the environment,

0:18:23.359 --> 0:18:26.080
<v Speaker 6>also make sure everybody has access to basics, which basic

0:18:26.119 --> 0:18:29.240
<v Speaker 6>since today days and age means a data center, power

0:18:29.320 --> 0:18:34.240
<v Speaker 6>by some sort of electricity production. So this, let me

0:18:34.280 --> 0:18:35.280
<v Speaker 6>interrupt this morning.

0:18:36.040 --> 0:18:40.680
<v Speaker 2>Apollo Funds comes out and says we're buying data centers

0:18:41.480 --> 0:18:44.800
<v Speaker 2>and they're buying stream data centers. Yeah, this is Joseph

0:18:44.880 --> 0:18:48.520
<v Speaker 2>Jackson and Trevor Mills that Apollo Partners, and that's exactly it.

0:18:48.600 --> 0:18:52.280
<v Speaker 2>Where private markets are coming in, that's right to finance

0:18:53.040 --> 0:18:55.800
<v Speaker 2>these this huge capital investment. Right.

0:18:56.119 --> 0:18:58.760
<v Speaker 6>Well, it's a great point, and here's the reality. Everybody's

0:18:58.840 --> 0:19:01.440
<v Speaker 6>been talking about data center for a while, and yet

0:19:01.480 --> 0:19:04.119
<v Speaker 6>if you look at the occupancy rates for data centers,

0:19:04.280 --> 0:19:07.440
<v Speaker 6>they are near record highs and we still think that

0:19:07.640 --> 0:19:11.320
<v Speaker 6>sort of the peak occupancy of data centers is still

0:19:11.359 --> 0:19:14.160
<v Speaker 6>a few quarters away. So that means for the time

0:19:14.240 --> 0:19:16.879
<v Speaker 6>being you still need to build out additional capacity and

0:19:16.920 --> 0:19:19.280
<v Speaker 6>supply demand for data centers is still going to be

0:19:19.359 --> 0:19:22.399
<v Speaker 6>tied for a period of time, so that that gives

0:19:22.400 --> 0:19:26.480
<v Speaker 6>you the ability to control the price and also the

0:19:26.560 --> 0:19:29.880
<v Speaker 6>investment has to continue as well. And by the way,

0:19:29.960 --> 0:19:31.879
<v Speaker 6>just another point to add on that, you know, just

0:19:32.280 --> 0:19:35.240
<v Speaker 6>real quick, data centers are thought right now for you know,

0:19:35.280 --> 0:19:37.800
<v Speaker 6>to be used for cloud and also training AI models.

0:19:38.080 --> 0:19:40.080
<v Speaker 6>But you know, Tom, the next phase of this of

0:19:40.200 --> 0:19:42.439
<v Speaker 6>data center growth is really the infront stage of it

0:19:42.520 --> 0:19:45.639
<v Speaker 6>and applying those train models into another use case.

0:19:46.960 --> 0:19:50.200
<v Speaker 4>Talk to us about valuation in this market. It's tough

0:19:50.240 --> 0:19:51.639
<v Speaker 4>here because it if you just kind of look at

0:19:51.680 --> 0:19:55.160
<v Speaker 4>the S and P of five hundred, it's expensive. But

0:19:55.200 --> 0:19:57.280
<v Speaker 4>if you make start making adjustments for some of these

0:19:57.840 --> 0:20:00.119
<v Speaker 4>technology companies, the mag seven of the world, maybe you

0:20:00.119 --> 0:20:02.800
<v Speaker 4>can make a case it's not that expensive. How do

0:20:02.840 --> 0:20:03.760
<v Speaker 4>you guys think about that.

0:20:04.160 --> 0:20:06.480
<v Speaker 6>I mean, it's true that Max seven versus the rest

0:20:06.800 --> 0:20:09.240
<v Speaker 6>is a very different scenario. But I will say that

0:20:09.320 --> 0:20:12.680
<v Speaker 6>even the cyclical sectors. For example, I looked at industrials

0:20:12.720 --> 0:20:15.520
<v Speaker 6>the other day, and even industrials then discount to the

0:20:15.640 --> 0:20:18.200
<v Speaker 6>S and P five hundred or for a machinery that

0:20:18.520 --> 0:20:21.520
<v Speaker 6>was actually the case, the discount has narrowed. So I think,

0:20:22.119 --> 0:20:25.960
<v Speaker 6>you know, broadly speaking, valuations in public markets have got

0:20:26.000 --> 0:20:28.600
<v Speaker 6>a long way in a short period of time. Having

0:20:28.640 --> 0:20:31.280
<v Speaker 6>said that, in private markets, that's where we are still

0:20:31.320 --> 0:20:34.520
<v Speaker 6>finding cheaper valuations. And if I look at the s

0:20:34.600 --> 0:20:37.120
<v Speaker 6>and P five hundred EV to Ibada, we're probably close

0:20:37.160 --> 0:20:40.080
<v Speaker 6>to seventeen seventeen and a half times. If I look

0:20:40.080 --> 0:20:43.040
<v Speaker 6>at private markets, we're about twelve point two times for

0:20:43.359 --> 0:20:47.040
<v Speaker 6>US EV to Ebadi in private markets. So that's why

0:20:47.240 --> 0:20:51.400
<v Speaker 6>we're obviously quite focused on scapture evaluation in private mark.

0:20:51.440 --> 0:20:53.240
<v Speaker 2>Just may be delicate. I don't want you putting in

0:20:53.320 --> 0:20:57.120
<v Speaker 2>jail and zoo Switzerland. But okay, but there's a lockup

0:20:57.160 --> 0:21:01.119
<v Speaker 2>to private markets are you seeing? I mean there's an

0:21:01.200 --> 0:21:04.680
<v Speaker 2>article in Carlisle this morning where they're jettising finally a

0:21:04.720 --> 0:21:07.320
<v Speaker 2>lot of properties in the buoyancy that we're in right now.

0:21:07.359 --> 0:21:12.399
<v Speaker 2>But do you see liquidity within private markets? It makes

0:21:12.480 --> 0:21:17.679
<v Speaker 2>up the liquidity penalty going from ev to ebit up.

0:21:17.560 --> 0:21:21.680
<v Speaker 6>To down right Well, liquidity is a big concern I

0:21:21.720 --> 0:21:25.440
<v Speaker 6>think one in private markets investing, and I think one

0:21:25.480 --> 0:21:28.080
<v Speaker 6>of the things that Partners Group has done for a

0:21:28.119 --> 0:21:30.760
<v Speaker 6>long period of time is managed that liquidity for clients

0:21:30.800 --> 0:21:33.280
<v Speaker 6>in an evergreen solution. And what I mean by that,

0:21:33.760 --> 0:21:36.399
<v Speaker 6>and what I mean by that is clients have the

0:21:36.440 --> 0:21:40.240
<v Speaker 6>ability for quarterly liquidity if they need to. And the

0:21:40.400 --> 0:21:42.960
<v Speaker 6>reason we're able to do that is because not only

0:21:42.960 --> 0:21:46.080
<v Speaker 6>do we focus on direct control investments, but also secondary

0:21:46.200 --> 0:21:50.720
<v Speaker 6>co invests and that really you know, having managed this

0:21:50.840 --> 0:21:56.560
<v Speaker 6>for about sixteen years, it's been multiple cycles and liquidity

0:21:56.600 --> 0:21:57.600
<v Speaker 6>has been there for clients.

0:21:57.600 --> 0:22:02.800
<v Speaker 2>Can I do it? Audible? Mentioned evergreen solution? Do you

0:22:02.880 --> 0:22:05.399
<v Speaker 2>have a real Christmas tree or a fake Christmas tree.

0:22:05.640 --> 0:22:06.600
<v Speaker 6>I always get a real one.

0:22:07.440 --> 0:22:11.399
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the biggest, the right answer, the biggest argument. Me

0:22:11.480 --> 0:22:13.879
<v Speaker 2>and John farrellhead I go over to Pharaohs. He's got

0:22:13.920 --> 0:22:16.920
<v Speaker 2>the fake Christmas tree with the light things filling around

0:22:16.960 --> 0:22:19.800
<v Speaker 2>at the bottom. I'm like, John, it's an American. You

0:22:19.920 --> 0:22:23.159
<v Speaker 2>gotta have a real tree. Okay. So that's that's our

0:22:23.200 --> 0:22:26.520
<v Speaker 2>evergreen solution here, Paul continue, I got way laid there.

0:22:26.760 --> 0:22:28.800
<v Speaker 4>Private credit it's been such a big part of the

0:22:28.960 --> 0:22:33.240
<v Speaker 4>alternative investment theme over the last certainly last fifteen years,

0:22:33.240 --> 0:22:35.320
<v Speaker 4>I guess since a financial crisis when it really got big.

0:22:35.320 --> 0:22:38.160
<v Speaker 4>How do you guys think about private credit alongside your

0:22:38.200 --> 0:22:39.639
<v Speaker 4>private equity and your other businesses.

0:22:39.720 --> 0:22:43.080
<v Speaker 6>Sure, it's a really important part of the solutions suite.

0:22:43.160 --> 0:22:45.080
<v Speaker 6>And you know, look, if you think about a bank

0:22:45.119 --> 0:22:48.480
<v Speaker 6>share of private credit of lending, it has stepped down

0:22:48.480 --> 0:22:51.200
<v Speaker 6>from about seventy four percent back twenty some years ago

0:22:51.320 --> 0:22:54.159
<v Speaker 6>to about twenty five percent depending on the quarter. And

0:22:54.200 --> 0:22:57.320
<v Speaker 6>it's been the private credit providers that have stepped in

0:22:57.359 --> 0:23:00.840
<v Speaker 6>and provided the liquidity and plugged in that gap. So

0:23:00.880 --> 0:23:02.960
<v Speaker 6>now about seventy five percent of the market is actually

0:23:03.080 --> 0:23:07.920
<v Speaker 6>driven by private credit. So look from a market perspective.

0:23:08.119 --> 0:23:09.960
<v Speaker 6>You know, whether we get a rate cut or not

0:23:10.040 --> 0:23:13.320
<v Speaker 6>from the FED, I will say the excess spread that

0:23:13.400 --> 0:23:17.040
<v Speaker 6>you get from in direct lending, for example, of on

0:23:17.119 --> 0:23:20.679
<v Speaker 6>average about five hundred basis points is quite attractive, you know,

0:23:20.800 --> 0:23:24.440
<v Speaker 6>especially rates keep heading lower private credit screen as well.

0:23:24.520 --> 0:23:26.520
<v Speaker 2>In the time left, I got to get some SPX

0:23:27.400 --> 0:23:30.399
<v Speaker 2>vision from you. How far up forward are you in

0:23:30.480 --> 0:23:33.720
<v Speaker 2>the stock market? How do you frame six end of

0:23:33.720 --> 0:23:35.920
<v Speaker 2>the year or even twelve months forward right now?

0:23:35.960 --> 0:23:39.040
<v Speaker 6>Look, I think we're in for a consolidation quarter this quarter,

0:23:39.080 --> 0:23:42.040
<v Speaker 6>at least until September seventeenth, which is of course the

0:23:42.160 --> 0:23:45.080
<v Speaker 6>FOMC decision. And I say that because we're going to

0:23:45.119 --> 0:23:49.240
<v Speaker 6>hear a lot about the tariff impacts on net profit margins,

0:23:49.320 --> 0:23:51.159
<v Speaker 6>and maybe some of that is going to be offset

0:23:51.200 --> 0:23:53.280
<v Speaker 6>by well, the label market is weak, therefore the FED

0:23:53.320 --> 0:23:55.840
<v Speaker 6>is going to cut, So I expect choppiness. But as

0:23:55.840 --> 0:23:59.520
<v Speaker 6>I think about the fourth quarter and into twenty twenty six, Tom,

0:23:59.560 --> 0:24:02.000
<v Speaker 6>I think, so what doesn't get talked about enough is

0:24:02.000 --> 0:24:04.760
<v Speaker 6>that we did pass a tax built that's quite favorable

0:24:04.800 --> 0:24:07.760
<v Speaker 6>for the consumer, but it's also quite favorable for businesses

0:24:07.800 --> 0:24:09.920
<v Speaker 6>as well. So whether it's one hundred percent R and

0:24:10.000 --> 0:24:12.919
<v Speaker 6>D expensing that has now been made permanent, or one

0:24:13.000 --> 0:24:15.600
<v Speaker 6>hundred percent depreciation that has also been made.

0:24:15.880 --> 0:24:20.480
<v Speaker 2>This is underplayed. Yeah, stimulus, the stimulus impact, you know,

0:24:20.520 --> 0:24:24.000
<v Speaker 2>the cynics would say it's clearly around Republican re election

0:24:24.119 --> 0:24:26.960
<v Speaker 2>twenty six and the president to twenty eight. But the

0:24:27.000 --> 0:24:30.080
<v Speaker 2>answer that the stimulus we're living right now is tangible.

0:24:30.280 --> 0:24:32.800
<v Speaker 6>It is tangible into twenty twenty six. We're not going

0:24:32.880 --> 0:24:35.400
<v Speaker 6>to see much of it this year, but into twenty

0:24:35.400 --> 0:24:37.280
<v Speaker 6>twenty six. And Tom, you know how the markets work,

0:24:37.320 --> 0:24:39.240
<v Speaker 6>They look forward, So I think that'll be an important

0:24:39.240 --> 0:24:40.359
<v Speaker 6>story in the fourth quarter.

0:24:41.000 --> 0:24:43.159
<v Speaker 2>So, but it's still not out of the triple leverage

0:24:43.200 --> 0:24:46.440
<v Speaker 2>all cash. I know how the markets work exactly one marvel.

0:24:46.640 --> 0:24:50.360
<v Speaker 4>So, Anastasia, how's your how's your job get to change?

0:24:50.400 --> 0:24:52.440
<v Speaker 4>Do you think if at all being part of the

0:24:52.480 --> 0:24:55.600
<v Speaker 4>Partners Group now, which is such a large alternative asset

0:24:55.600 --> 0:24:56.520
<v Speaker 4>manager globally with.

0:24:56.600 --> 0:24:59.600
<v Speaker 6>The other right, Well, it's certainly a privilege to be

0:24:59.600 --> 0:25:03.200
<v Speaker 6>a Partner group, and the role is really to help

0:25:03.240 --> 0:25:06.959
<v Speaker 6>our clients think about how does the macro how are

0:25:06.960 --> 0:25:10.720
<v Speaker 6>the macro forces impact your investment portfolio, specifically from the

0:25:10.720 --> 0:25:13.520
<v Speaker 6>standpoint of allocating to private markets. So what is this

0:25:13.600 --> 0:25:18.200
<v Speaker 6>combination of inflation to rates, to growth to tariffs mean

0:25:18.240 --> 0:25:20.560
<v Speaker 6>for investing in private equity? Where do we find some

0:25:20.600 --> 0:25:23.920
<v Speaker 6>of the best opportunities within directs or secondaries? What does

0:25:23.920 --> 0:25:28.359
<v Speaker 6>this mean for private credit, real estate, royalties, investment and more?

0:25:28.800 --> 0:25:31.280
<v Speaker 6>And you know, the other big conversation is that I

0:25:31.320 --> 0:25:35.760
<v Speaker 6>think a lot of clients understand and want to allocate

0:25:35.800 --> 0:25:37.840
<v Speaker 6>to private markets, but for a lot it's still a

0:25:37.840 --> 0:25:42.040
<v Speaker 6>consideration of how and how much. So helping advise clients

0:25:42.080 --> 0:25:45.159
<v Speaker 6>on the portfolio construct to private markets is an important

0:25:45.160 --> 0:25:46.280
<v Speaker 6>one as well as as.

0:25:46.200 --> 0:25:50.560
<v Speaker 2>You think, is someone at your Optimism American Economic Experiments

0:25:50.600 --> 0:25:53.399
<v Speaker 2>and ross with the Partners Group.

0:25:53.640 --> 0:25:57.560
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Listen live each weekday

0:25:57.600 --> 0:26:00.920
<v Speaker 1>starting at seven am Eastern on Applecarpe and Android Atto

0:26:01.000 --> 0:26:03.960
<v Speaker 1>with the Bloomberg Business App. You can also listen live

0:26:04.040 --> 0:26:07.639
<v Speaker 1>on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station, Just

0:26:07.680 --> 0:26:10.200
<v Speaker 1>say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:26:10.560 --> 0:26:13.880
<v Speaker 2>Stephenoff joins down cio equities at Federator or Medicine. They've

0:26:13.880 --> 0:26:17.360
<v Speaker 2>got different approaches there, but all you need to know

0:26:17.480 --> 0:26:20.640
<v Speaker 2>is looking at the Federated Growth Fund. It's under the

0:26:20.640 --> 0:26:24.160
<v Speaker 2>the othean umbrella, as we call it. I mean it's

0:26:24.280 --> 0:26:28.760
<v Speaker 2>it's sort of doing okay. Three year ninety fifth percentile,

0:26:29.119 --> 0:26:33.040
<v Speaker 2>five year ninety ninth percentile. They're off the market today,

0:26:33.160 --> 0:26:35.879
<v Speaker 2>not too bad. And this is all the growth juggernaut,

0:26:35.920 --> 0:26:39.520
<v Speaker 2>and this is what Steve aut has acclaimed for worldwide.

0:26:39.720 --> 0:26:45.720
<v Speaker 2>I want you to explain, in this unique year, how

0:26:45.800 --> 0:26:51.760
<v Speaker 2>you approach equity investment knowing, like baseball twenty five or

0:26:51.760 --> 0:26:54.120
<v Speaker 2>twenty six or twenty eight percent of the stocks will

0:26:54.160 --> 0:26:58.440
<v Speaker 2>go up and the rest don't forget the what stock

0:26:58.520 --> 0:27:02.840
<v Speaker 2>to pick? How do you choose not to own a

0:27:02.920 --> 0:27:04.719
<v Speaker 2>stock in the S and P five hundred?

0:27:05.960 --> 0:27:09.200
<v Speaker 5>Well, I think it's our time horizon. That's a little different, right.

0:27:09.280 --> 0:27:15.840
<v Speaker 5>The most traders today are focused on day to day movements.

0:27:16.040 --> 0:27:19.240
<v Speaker 5>We're too big to even think about it that way anyway,

0:27:19.320 --> 0:27:22.080
<v Speaker 5>But I think it's not really the path to success

0:27:22.200 --> 0:27:24.639
<v Speaker 5>in the investment markets. We tend to look at a

0:27:24.640 --> 0:27:28.119
<v Speaker 5>longer term horizon, and that leads us to look through

0:27:28.240 --> 0:27:30.440
<v Speaker 5>some of the noise. What's interesting to me. I think

0:27:30.480 --> 0:27:33.520
<v Speaker 5>one reason we're having a pretty decent year here and

0:27:33.600 --> 0:27:36.520
<v Speaker 5>we did last year is the news cycle has really

0:27:36.600 --> 0:27:40.400
<v Speaker 5>shortened up, and so the folks chasing around the news

0:27:40.440 --> 0:27:44.040
<v Speaker 5>cycle are like chickens with their heads cut off, getting

0:27:44.080 --> 0:27:46.800
<v Speaker 5>whipsawed left and right. I mean, if you were following

0:27:46.800 --> 0:27:48.800
<v Speaker 5>the news cycle in April.

0:27:49.760 --> 0:27:51.720
<v Speaker 2>You went to cats. Is that what hedge funds do?

0:27:54.119 --> 0:27:55.120
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to speak to the.

0:27:55.040 --> 0:27:58.800
<v Speaker 5>Hedge funds broadly, but certainly that's one of the ways

0:27:58.800 --> 0:28:00.000
<v Speaker 5>they try to make money.

0:28:00.000 --> 0:28:01.480
<v Speaker 2>We have a lot of folks doing it.

0:28:01.600 --> 0:28:03.159
<v Speaker 5>Some of them do a good job at it, so

0:28:03.200 --> 0:28:06.240
<v Speaker 5>I'm not knocking the hedgehuns, but we tend to look

0:28:06.400 --> 0:28:10.080
<v Speaker 5>longer term and right now. That's helped us a lot

0:28:10.200 --> 0:28:14.960
<v Speaker 5>because one reason we were more optimistic in the spring

0:28:15.200 --> 0:28:18.399
<v Speaker 5>was to us, the gap between the soft data and

0:28:18.440 --> 0:28:21.399
<v Speaker 5>the hard data was pointing to you know, we are

0:28:21.400 --> 0:28:23.560
<v Speaker 5>in a little bit of a slowdown here, but we

0:28:23.640 --> 0:28:27.240
<v Speaker 5>thought coming through it, things would get better. And once

0:28:27.280 --> 0:28:30.600
<v Speaker 5>we got this uncertainty behind us this summer and here

0:28:30.640 --> 0:28:34.000
<v Speaker 5>we are right on schedule, you get a kind of

0:28:34.320 --> 0:28:37.960
<v Speaker 5>bounce effect just from the uncertainty lifting. Not to mention

0:28:38.960 --> 0:28:43.080
<v Speaker 5>you know, the the incentives to further investment through the

0:28:44.080 --> 0:28:47.880
<v Speaker 5>tax cut, You've got the deregulation thing coming through, and

0:28:48.520 --> 0:28:53.040
<v Speaker 5>you know, fortunately the Fed is looking backward, so they're

0:28:53.080 --> 0:28:53.800
<v Speaker 5>going to be cutting.

0:28:54.720 --> 0:28:58.400
<v Speaker 2>Well, we got to remind ourselves. One, you're trailing Nastack

0:28:58.520 --> 0:29:02.160
<v Speaker 2>up twenty eight percent, SMP five hundred and twenty percent,

0:29:02.640 --> 0:29:06.040
<v Speaker 2>now up thirteen percent. How many of our listeners and viewers,

0:29:06.320 --> 0:29:11.640
<v Speaker 2>including me, right understand looking back twelve months we got

0:29:11.640 --> 0:29:15.080
<v Speaker 2>a double digit to zero. Yep, that's amazing, exactly.

0:29:14.880 --> 0:29:17.760
<v Speaker 5>Right, and often, by the way, that's a precursor of

0:29:17.800 --> 0:29:21.000
<v Speaker 5>a pretty decent next twelve months if.

0:29:20.920 --> 0:29:24.120
<v Speaker 4>You look at the data, so Steve, one of the

0:29:24.120 --> 0:29:26.720
<v Speaker 4>concerns in particularly in the equity markets is a concentration

0:29:26.880 --> 0:29:29.120
<v Speaker 4>risk here. We've got it in the mag seven or

0:29:29.120 --> 0:29:31.600
<v Speaker 4>whatever you want to call it. So much of the performance,

0:29:31.680 --> 0:29:35.280
<v Speaker 4>so much of the valuation, is concentrated in a handful

0:29:35.320 --> 0:29:38.360
<v Speaker 4>of names, and people like Torston, slock Over Topollo just

0:29:38.440 --> 0:29:40.600
<v Speaker 4>kind of call out, well, we haven't seen that very

0:29:40.640 --> 0:29:42.280
<v Speaker 4>often in the past, and when we did see it

0:29:42.960 --> 0:29:45.640
<v Speaker 4>late nineties, it wasn't a good thing, do you guys.

0:29:45.720 --> 0:29:47.440
<v Speaker 5>Late nineties was a completely different thing.

0:29:47.480 --> 0:29:47.600
<v Speaker 2>Though.

0:29:47.600 --> 0:29:49.400
<v Speaker 5>If you look at the share of the top ten

0:29:50.120 --> 0:29:52.160
<v Speaker 5>versus the share of earnings of the top ten on

0:29:52.240 --> 0:29:54.720
<v Speaker 5>market gap, it's a flip flop of the late nineties, right,

0:29:54.800 --> 0:29:58.080
<v Speaker 5>late nineties, we didn't have any earnings. These top seven

0:29:58.160 --> 0:30:02.640
<v Speaker 5>companies are terrific companies with enormous free cash flow that

0:30:02.760 --> 0:30:06.440
<v Speaker 5>we think are reasonably valued, and within them even there,

0:30:06.800 --> 0:30:09.080
<v Speaker 5>what we're calling for is, as you think, you know,

0:30:09.320 --> 0:30:13.200
<v Speaker 5>is a rotation into the broader market. Okay, and that's

0:30:13.240 --> 0:30:15.520
<v Speaker 5>going to help our stockbreckers, by the way, but you

0:30:15.560 --> 0:30:20.160
<v Speaker 5>know that rotation has been slowed down by concerns that

0:30:20.240 --> 0:30:22.560
<v Speaker 5>the world was going to end with all the tarret

0:30:22.640 --> 0:30:25.480
<v Speaker 5>stuff and everything else. Now that it's not ending, I

0:30:25.520 --> 0:30:28.360
<v Speaker 5>think those stocks are going to start and that's what's happening.

0:30:28.400 --> 0:30:32.200
<v Speaker 5>We're already seeing the market broadening out here that the

0:30:32.280 --> 0:30:35.240
<v Speaker 5>mag seven have had a good run. We like within

0:30:35.320 --> 0:30:38.680
<v Speaker 5>that even some rotation like a Google as an example stock,

0:30:38.720 --> 0:30:41.800
<v Speaker 5>we like great cash flow generator training at about seventeen

0:30:41.880 --> 0:30:44.160
<v Speaker 5>eighteen times earnings for what you're getting.

0:30:44.560 --> 0:30:46.920
<v Speaker 2>You know, Paul, you mentioned this the federated growth and

0:30:47.000 --> 0:30:50.840
<v Speaker 2>this is the MTT platform out of Milwaukee. Forty seven

0:30:50.920 --> 0:30:54.680
<v Speaker 2>point four percent in the top ten stocks. Yep. That's

0:30:54.760 --> 0:30:58.760
<v Speaker 2>so way from the textbooks exactly studied years ago.

0:30:59.040 --> 0:31:02.720
<v Speaker 4>So see, are there sectors that screenwall for you these days?

0:31:02.760 --> 0:31:04.880
<v Speaker 2>Are there factors that screen wall for you these things.

0:31:04.920 --> 0:31:07.360
<v Speaker 2>That's a really important question about it. We haven't asked

0:31:07.360 --> 0:31:12.000
<v Speaker 2>that in ages. Yeah, Saunders questions exactly. Factors.

0:31:13.320 --> 0:31:16.120
<v Speaker 5>Well, our you know, our MTT model that we use

0:31:16.200 --> 0:31:20.160
<v Speaker 5>is multi factored, and it's it's very complicated and probably

0:31:20.160 --> 0:31:24.840
<v Speaker 5>too complicated, but it really tries to imitate the way

0:31:24.920 --> 0:31:28.440
<v Speaker 5>a human brain works in a way i'd call it.

0:31:29.200 --> 0:31:31.840
<v Speaker 5>We don't call it artificial intelligence, call it machine learning.

0:31:31.920 --> 0:31:34.280
<v Speaker 2>This is after the third or fourth beer.

0:31:36.080 --> 0:31:39.760
<v Speaker 5>Continue, But it looks for combinations of things that you like,

0:31:40.320 --> 0:31:42.680
<v Speaker 5>and you know, we point to some combinations of things

0:31:42.720 --> 0:31:44.880
<v Speaker 5>that look pretty good here to us. I mean, if

0:31:44.920 --> 0:31:48.520
<v Speaker 5>you look at companies that are more cyclical in their

0:31:48.640 --> 0:31:52.760
<v Speaker 5>nature and their backdrop and then have good balance sheets

0:31:53.240 --> 0:31:57.600
<v Speaker 5>in valuations that are still pretty cheap, those are the

0:31:57.640 --> 0:32:02.120
<v Speaker 5>stocks that we kind of like here. Regional banks, some

0:32:02.200 --> 0:32:05.680
<v Speaker 5>of the out of favor technology companies, you know, some

0:32:05.720 --> 0:32:07.040
<v Speaker 5>of the industrial sectors.

0:32:07.120 --> 0:32:10.080
<v Speaker 2>Defense defense stocks have had pretty good runs.

0:32:10.080 --> 0:32:12.400
<v Speaker 5>So but you have to look underneath the surface to

0:32:12.480 --> 0:32:15.600
<v Speaker 5>find ones that makes sense. But yeah, it's those kind

0:32:15.640 --> 0:32:18.040
<v Speaker 5>of things now a little more of a value tilt,

0:32:18.840 --> 0:32:22.680
<v Speaker 5>perhaps even within growth like Google's a growth stock, but

0:32:22.840 --> 0:32:24.320
<v Speaker 5>with a kind of value tilt.

0:32:24.080 --> 0:32:26.440
<v Speaker 4>To it valuation. I'm sure you get pushed back from

0:32:26.480 --> 0:32:29.520
<v Speaker 4>your clients a lot about point this market looks expensive here.

0:32:30.320 --> 0:32:32.640
<v Speaker 4>How do you respond to that? You say, hey, if

0:32:32.640 --> 0:32:35.520
<v Speaker 4>you back out these handful of aims, the market's not

0:32:35.600 --> 0:32:36.280
<v Speaker 4>that expensive.

0:32:36.440 --> 0:32:37.640
<v Speaker 2>That's exactly how we do it.

0:32:37.680 --> 0:32:40.000
<v Speaker 5>In fact, what we started doing about a year ago

0:32:40.880 --> 0:32:44.000
<v Speaker 5>was we started calculating what a fair value on the

0:32:44.160 --> 0:32:46.200
<v Speaker 5>S and P would be if you did the math

0:32:46.720 --> 0:32:50.680
<v Speaker 5>in two parts and then combined it. These big cash

0:32:50.680 --> 0:32:54.719
<v Speaker 5>flow generators that are near monopoly businesses that are in

0:32:54.840 --> 0:32:58.880
<v Speaker 5>growth spaces, we think you add that all up, they're

0:32:58.920 --> 0:33:01.640
<v Speaker 5>probably worth like a twenty five multiple.

0:33:02.280 --> 0:33:02.560
<v Speaker 2>People.

0:33:02.680 --> 0:33:06.040
<v Speaker 5>Heuristic on what the market is worth is based in

0:33:06.120 --> 0:33:10.680
<v Speaker 5>a world where the market average was fifty percent cyclical

0:33:10.880 --> 0:33:17.040
<v Speaker 5>industrial type companies, and now that share of the market's

0:33:17.040 --> 0:33:20.680
<v Speaker 5>probably about thirty percent. And you've got these big casual generators.

0:33:20.680 --> 0:33:23.400
<v Speaker 5>So when you put them out there at twenty five

0:33:23.600 --> 0:33:25.920
<v Speaker 5>and you say, okay, call the rest of the market eighteen,

0:33:26.600 --> 0:33:29.080
<v Speaker 5>you get to a fair multiple on the market of

0:33:29.120 --> 0:33:31.520
<v Speaker 5>around twenty one and a half. That's what we've been

0:33:31.600 --> 0:33:34.480
<v Speaker 5>using in all our targets that have more or less

0:33:34.520 --> 0:33:37.400
<v Speaker 5>been working for us. You know where we're closing in

0:33:37.440 --> 0:33:39.440
<v Speaker 5>on our target for this year now, which at one

0:33:39.440 --> 0:33:40.760
<v Speaker 5>time seemed crazy, but.

0:33:40.680 --> 0:33:42.480
<v Speaker 2>You got to get this in over with a big

0:33:42.520 --> 0:33:46.800
<v Speaker 2>share we purchased today. How's use the cash going among

0:33:46.840 --> 0:33:49.480
<v Speaker 2>the anointed? Are they actually giving it back and share

0:33:49.560 --> 0:33:51.720
<v Speaker 2>purchase and dividend. We're seeing a lot.

0:33:51.560 --> 0:33:54.320
<v Speaker 5>Of that right now, Tom, And that's another reason that

0:33:54.360 --> 0:33:56.760
<v Speaker 5>we're bullsh on the market. Companies are throwing off a

0:33:56.800 --> 0:33:59.240
<v Speaker 5>lot of cash here and we're in that part of

0:33:59.280 --> 0:34:01.920
<v Speaker 5>the cycle here. You're seeing that, and the buybacks are

0:34:01.920 --> 0:34:03.360
<v Speaker 5>supporting seasons.

0:34:03.360 --> 0:34:05.800
<v Speaker 2>Am I right? Forty percent of free cash flows. Some

0:34:05.840 --> 0:34:07.800
<v Speaker 2>of these companies are paying out.

0:34:08.160 --> 0:34:11.560
<v Speaker 5>In our dividend fund, We've got companies paying out sixty

0:34:11.760 --> 0:34:14.880
<v Speaker 5>five seventy percent. We like to see that in slower

0:34:14.920 --> 0:34:18.000
<v Speaker 5>growing companies and the dividend fund, but you know, we

0:34:18.160 --> 0:34:18.760
<v Speaker 5>like to see.

0:34:18.560 --> 0:34:21.879
<v Speaker 2>Those big payoffs. Steven O, thank you so much. Thank

0:34:21.920 --> 0:34:27.560
<v Speaker 2>you federator being with us today.

0:34:30.040 --> 0:34:33.960
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Listen live each weekday

0:34:34.000 --> 0:34:37.040
<v Speaker 1>starting at seven am Eastern on Apple, Corplay and Android

0:34:37.040 --> 0:34:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also watch

0:34:40.120 --> 0:34:43.080
<v Speaker 1>us live every weekday on YouTube and always on the

0:34:43.080 --> 0:34:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg terminal.

0:34:44.400 --> 0:34:47.440
<v Speaker 2>Douglas Holt's Eichin was a huge value add for years

0:34:47.520 --> 0:34:50.719
<v Speaker 2>and years. For some reason, over the last quarters we

0:34:50.800 --> 0:34:53.960
<v Speaker 2>have not had the expertise at Douglas Holtz econ on

0:34:54.040 --> 0:34:56.160
<v Speaker 2>the show. We're thrilled and he could join us in

0:34:56.160 --> 0:34:59.880
<v Speaker 2>the American Action Forum. His public service with Senator McCain

0:35:00.760 --> 0:35:05.960
<v Speaker 2>years ago a GOP slant, yes, but always just exceptional

0:35:06.000 --> 0:35:09.520
<v Speaker 2>scholarship out of Dennison in prison. Doug, it's been way

0:35:09.560 --> 0:35:12.480
<v Speaker 2>way too long. Thank you so much for joining today.

0:35:12.640 --> 0:35:20.440
<v Speaker 2>How far removed, Douglas Holtziken, it's just traditional Republican economics

0:35:20.520 --> 0:35:24.560
<v Speaker 2>and Republican labor economics. How far removed is it from

0:35:24.640 --> 0:35:25.480
<v Speaker 2>President Trump?

0:35:28.120 --> 0:35:31.560
<v Speaker 7>This is an enormous shift in the Republican Party. I mean,

0:35:31.800 --> 0:35:37.440
<v Speaker 7>it's almost unrecognizable from twenty years ago. And the characteristic

0:35:37.520 --> 0:35:40.520
<v Speaker 7>of this area is that both parties are interested in

0:35:40.640 --> 0:35:43.440
<v Speaker 7>using the power of the government is a cudgel for

0:35:43.560 --> 0:35:47.440
<v Speaker 7>their purposes. And that's that's not a limited government personal

0:35:47.440 --> 0:35:49.680
<v Speaker 7>freedom approach, not at all.

0:35:49.800 --> 0:35:53.120
<v Speaker 2>What is Kevin Asset doing. I mean, I understand Pennsylvania

0:35:53.239 --> 0:35:57.680
<v Speaker 2>doesn't have the quality of Princeton to the far far Norris,

0:35:57.800 --> 0:36:00.200
<v Speaker 2>but you know you and I know Kevin ass and

0:36:00.200 --> 0:36:04.840
<v Speaker 2>as a legit macro economist, how is he carrying water

0:36:04.960 --> 0:36:08.160
<v Speaker 2>for the president? How do you see that? Douglas Holt Eacon.

0:36:09.000 --> 0:36:11.239
<v Speaker 7>Uh, you know, I think that's a question you have

0:36:11.320 --> 0:36:14.680
<v Speaker 7>to ask Kevin. I don't understand a lot of the

0:36:14.719 --> 0:36:19.400
<v Speaker 7>Trump administration messaging on their policies. I certainly don't understand

0:36:19.400 --> 0:36:22.680
<v Speaker 7>the strategy and their policies, and and if Kevin understands it,

0:36:22.719 --> 0:36:23.839
<v Speaker 7>I'd like to understand it better.

0:36:24.719 --> 0:36:24.959
<v Speaker 1>Doug.

0:36:25.040 --> 0:36:28.200
<v Speaker 4>We we had some fireworks at the Bureau Labor Statistics

0:36:28.280 --> 0:36:30.719
<v Speaker 4>last week when the jobs data came out here. Can

0:36:30.760 --> 0:36:33.800
<v Speaker 4>you put that in context based upon your experience?

0:36:35.760 --> 0:36:38.640
<v Speaker 7>Well, you know, the assertion by the President was that

0:36:38.680 --> 0:36:42.240
<v Speaker 7>the commissioner rigged the data, and there's simply no evidence

0:36:42.680 --> 0:36:44.880
<v Speaker 7>of rigging the data, and there's no opportunity actually for

0:36:44.920 --> 0:36:48.200
<v Speaker 7>the commissioner to alter the data in anyway if you

0:36:48.200 --> 0:36:51.680
<v Speaker 7>look at the procedures that are followed. So it's a

0:36:51.719 --> 0:36:55.920
<v Speaker 7>baseless assertion. It's something that I think it is obviously

0:36:56.040 --> 0:37:00.920
<v Speaker 7>detrimental to the institution. It undermines to some extent credibility

0:37:00.680 --> 0:37:03.120
<v Speaker 7>of the government's data, and you don't like to see that.

0:37:03.880 --> 0:37:06.479
<v Speaker 7>And it was simply the White House trying to change

0:37:06.480 --> 0:37:09.080
<v Speaker 7>the subject from the substance of the data, which is

0:37:09.520 --> 0:37:11.880
<v Speaker 7>really poor jobs numbers over the past three months, to

0:37:13.120 --> 0:37:16.640
<v Speaker 7>firing an official who's a holdover from the Biden administration.

0:37:16.960 --> 0:37:19.000
<v Speaker 7>So it's an old playbook the White House. This White

0:37:19.040 --> 0:37:23.000
<v Speaker 7>House has used a lot. I do think it has

0:37:23.040 --> 0:37:25.840
<v Speaker 7>brought to the surface something that's really important, which is

0:37:26.400 --> 0:37:30.000
<v Speaker 7>the diminishing potential quality of the data at the BA

0:37:30.080 --> 0:37:33.080
<v Speaker 7>and the BLS. And you know, now, I think the

0:37:33.120 --> 0:37:36.360
<v Speaker 7>general public understands that response rates have fallen, that the

0:37:36.400 --> 0:37:39.799
<v Speaker 7>sampling sizes have gone down, and that initial listments are

0:37:40.120 --> 0:37:42.280
<v Speaker 7>as firm as they might be. So now the questions,

0:37:42.280 --> 0:37:45.239
<v Speaker 7>will anyone get behind an effort to improve those data

0:37:45.239 --> 0:37:48.800
<v Speaker 7>collecting efforts and strengthen those statistical agencies.

0:37:49.080 --> 0:37:51.520
<v Speaker 4>That's a good point, Doug. I mean it kind of

0:37:51.520 --> 0:37:54.520
<v Speaker 4>seems almost antiquated, you know, going out and doing a

0:37:54.560 --> 0:37:56.560
<v Speaker 4>survey in a world of digital.

0:37:58.080 --> 0:37:58.920
<v Speaker 2>Opportunities.

0:37:59.120 --> 0:38:00.719
<v Speaker 7>Here, can I say something about that?

0:38:00.719 --> 0:38:00.959
<v Speaker 2>Paul?

0:38:01.160 --> 0:38:03.759
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, you know a lot of people brought this up,

0:38:03.800 --> 0:38:05.600
<v Speaker 7>you know, like you should be tapping into the ADP

0:38:05.800 --> 0:38:10.240
<v Speaker 7>or other payroll processors, but at some point you actually

0:38:10.280 --> 0:38:12.600
<v Speaker 7>have to do a census of things. So that you

0:38:12.760 --> 0:38:15.239
<v Speaker 7>understand what the weights are going to be on the

0:38:15.280 --> 0:38:19.000
<v Speaker 7>ADP data. They sends it over sample large firms. So

0:38:19.280 --> 0:38:22.840
<v Speaker 7>there is at some point the antiquated issue of going

0:38:23.280 --> 0:38:25.919
<v Speaker 7>figuratively door to door and finding out what's out there,

0:38:26.440 --> 0:38:29.160
<v Speaker 7>knowing what the relative composition of the labor market is.

0:38:29.840 --> 0:38:32.680
<v Speaker 7>And that's an expensive and time consuming process, but it

0:38:32.719 --> 0:38:34.640
<v Speaker 7>needs to be done, be done better.

0:38:35.560 --> 0:38:39.560
<v Speaker 2>The hallmarkt holds he can work, folks, are single sentences

0:38:39.600 --> 0:38:43.480
<v Speaker 2>that make you stop. May I quote the non education,

0:38:44.000 --> 0:38:48.680
<v Speaker 2>non health private sector has lost forty six thousand jobs

0:38:49.040 --> 0:38:52.440
<v Speaker 2>over the past three months. Good morning, Nancy Lazar, who's

0:38:52.480 --> 0:38:55.799
<v Speaker 2>been brilliant on this. I don't think Doug that's understood

0:38:56.280 --> 0:39:01.840
<v Speaker 2>that private sector employment is terrible X the gifts of

0:39:01.960 --> 0:39:02.920
<v Speaker 2>health and education.

0:39:04.280 --> 0:39:06.880
<v Speaker 7>It's dead in the water and has been. I've been

0:39:07.600 --> 0:39:12.400
<v Speaker 7>confused by this sort of positive reactions to the recent

0:39:12.480 --> 0:39:15.320
<v Speaker 7>labor market reports because you know, even before the revision,

0:39:15.360 --> 0:39:17.600
<v Speaker 7>when we got one hundred and forty seven thousand jobs

0:39:18.200 --> 0:39:21.520
<v Speaker 7>in the previous employment report, seventy odd thousand of them

0:39:21.520 --> 0:39:24.960
<v Speaker 7>were in state in local governments. Of the remaining seventy odd,

0:39:25.160 --> 0:39:28.320
<v Speaker 7>fifty eight thousand were in health. It's the only place

0:39:28.320 --> 0:39:30.799
<v Speaker 7>that was generating any jobs. Everything else is dead in

0:39:30.840 --> 0:39:33.080
<v Speaker 7>the water. So when I look at the labor market,

0:39:33.080 --> 0:39:34.880
<v Speaker 7>I see a labor market where no one gets fired.

0:39:34.880 --> 0:39:37.160
<v Speaker 7>That's great, but no one gets hired either. It is

0:39:37.160 --> 0:39:39.120
<v Speaker 7>at a standstill, and that's really quite wrong.

0:39:39.320 --> 0:39:41.280
<v Speaker 2>So so how to fold that over to FED policy?

0:39:41.320 --> 0:39:41.400
<v Speaker 5>Here?

0:39:41.400 --> 0:39:44.040
<v Speaker 2>I mean, go to sixty thousand feet if you will.

0:39:44.080 --> 0:39:46.399
<v Speaker 2>I brought it up today for the first time. Are

0:39:46.440 --> 0:39:49.200
<v Speaker 2>we at a point now where this is so emergent

0:39:49.360 --> 0:39:51.400
<v Speaker 2>that in one week or two weeks we're going to

0:39:51.440 --> 0:39:56.400
<v Speaker 2>be talking about a fifty B cut September seventeenth.

0:39:56.520 --> 0:39:59.640
<v Speaker 7>I don't think we do see the basis for fifty

0:39:59.680 --> 0:40:02.399
<v Speaker 7>bas points because you know, the FED has a dual

0:40:02.440 --> 0:40:06.680
<v Speaker 7>mandate and and the Trump tariffs have really put the

0:40:06.680 --> 0:40:10.399
<v Speaker 7>FED in the crossairs because the inflation pressures are there,

0:40:10.920 --> 0:40:15.360
<v Speaker 7>the labor markets, uh, you know, really at a standstill.

0:40:15.480 --> 0:40:18.200
<v Speaker 7>So the mandates are telling you to do different things,

0:40:18.200 --> 0:40:20.479
<v Speaker 7>and how you balance that is an incredibly hard job.

0:40:20.960 --> 0:40:24.160
<v Speaker 7>People people put different weights on, you know, inflation versus unemployment.

0:40:24.360 --> 0:40:27.600
<v Speaker 7>They do, and we don't know how quickly this is

0:40:27.600 --> 0:40:28.040
<v Speaker 7>going to work.

0:40:28.120 --> 0:40:31.560
<v Speaker 2>So Paul I got to interrupt Doug. This is too

0:40:31.600 --> 0:40:35.000
<v Speaker 2>important Paul get one more in here, But does it

0:40:35.320 --> 0:40:37.120
<v Speaker 2>does Holts? He can look like he could be a

0:40:37.160 --> 0:40:37.880
<v Speaker 2>fed governor.

0:40:37.960 --> 0:40:42.360
<v Speaker 7>Oh, I mean that, I promise you he does not

0:40:42.440 --> 0:40:43.680
<v Speaker 7>look like he's going to be a fed.

0:40:45.800 --> 0:40:47.560
<v Speaker 4>So Doug, let's let's just kind of put a bow

0:40:47.600 --> 0:40:49.719
<v Speaker 4>on this with a discussion of tariffs here. I mean,

0:40:49.719 --> 0:40:52.760
<v Speaker 4>tariffs are here. They are here to stay. It looks

0:40:52.840 --> 0:40:55.759
<v Speaker 4>like and it's whether it's fifteen, eighteen twenty percent on

0:40:55.800 --> 0:40:58.279
<v Speaker 4>an average basis, how do you think that's going to

0:40:58.320 --> 0:41:01.160
<v Speaker 4>play out through this economy over there come six twelve,

0:41:01.160 --> 0:41:01.880
<v Speaker 4>eighteen months.

0:41:03.360 --> 0:41:05.959
<v Speaker 7>So I think number one, you have the right time frame.

0:41:06.400 --> 0:41:09.719
<v Speaker 7>People have gotten too accustomed to the notion that a

0:41:09.760 --> 0:41:13.160
<v Speaker 7>pandemic or financial crisis hits the mainStreet economy, and we

0:41:13.200 --> 0:41:15.520
<v Speaker 7>see real quickly what's going on. This is going to

0:41:15.560 --> 0:41:19.360
<v Speaker 7>evolve over quarters and years, not weeks and months, and

0:41:19.400 --> 0:41:22.279
<v Speaker 7>so we really haven't seen the impact yet. It is

0:41:22.400 --> 0:41:26.200
<v Speaker 7>unmistakable that the terrorists of this size, so roughly three

0:41:26.320 --> 0:41:29.040
<v Speaker 7>hundred to three hundred and fifty billion dollars at annualized rate,

0:41:29.239 --> 0:41:32.160
<v Speaker 7>that's a very big tax increase. It is going to

0:41:32.840 --> 0:41:35.520
<v Speaker 7>put upward pressure on prices, no way around it. And

0:41:35.520 --> 0:41:38.400
<v Speaker 7>it's going to take purchasing power away from consumers, and

0:41:38.760 --> 0:41:42.000
<v Speaker 7>that's going to slow the economy. So at some point

0:41:42.120 --> 0:41:45.520
<v Speaker 7>over the that six to twelve month horizon, we are

0:41:45.560 --> 0:41:49.240
<v Speaker 7>going to pay the price in inflation and slower employment growth.

0:41:49.239 --> 0:41:51.480
<v Speaker 7>And we're starting to see that, and there's no way

0:41:51.480 --> 0:41:53.399
<v Speaker 7>out of that. The only question is how big will

0:41:53.440 --> 0:41:54.720
<v Speaker 7>it be and how fast will it happen?

0:41:54.880 --> 0:41:56.880
<v Speaker 2>You know, as blue Tie as sort of a governor,

0:41:56.920 --> 0:42:00.319
<v Speaker 2>Blue Tie, Sure, I think it is solid. Second, thank

0:42:00.360 --> 0:42:02.560
<v Speaker 2>you so much, wonderful. It's on way too long. Doug.

0:42:02.560 --> 0:42:04.880
<v Speaker 2>We got to get you on your numerous times before.

0:42:04.960 --> 0:42:09.000
<v Speaker 2>Jackson hold Douglas oltz econ his public service. It's CBO.

0:42:09.080 --> 0:42:12.280
<v Speaker 2>He's a president of the American Action Forum.

0:42:12.840 --> 0:42:16.760
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Listen live each weekday

0:42:16.800 --> 0:42:20.200
<v Speaker 1>starting at seven am Eastern on Applecarplay and Android Auto

0:42:20.239 --> 0:42:23.200
<v Speaker 1>with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also listen live

0:42:23.280 --> 0:42:26.840
<v Speaker 1>on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station, Just

0:42:26.880 --> 0:42:30.600
<v Speaker 1>say Alexa Play Bloomberg. Eleven thirty Lisa Mateo.

0:42:30.400 --> 0:42:33.040
<v Speaker 2>Fired up for the newspaper. She said, at three am,

0:42:34.120 --> 0:42:35.239
<v Speaker 2>what are you starting with today?

0:42:35.320 --> 0:42:37.759
<v Speaker 8>Okay, big sports news, So let's break this down. Okay,

0:42:37.760 --> 0:42:39.600
<v Speaker 8>so the NFL is going to sell most of its

0:42:39.640 --> 0:42:42.759
<v Speaker 8>media business to Walt Disney. This is in exchange for

0:42:42.840 --> 0:42:46.120
<v Speaker 8>a ten percent steak in the ESPN Sports Networks. Okay,

0:42:46.120 --> 0:42:48.800
<v Speaker 8>So ESPN, you know, jointly owned by Disney, they have

0:42:48.840 --> 0:42:51.520
<v Speaker 8>about an eighty percent steak, and also Hirst Communications they

0:42:51.560 --> 0:42:52.840
<v Speaker 8>have a twenty percent steak.

0:42:53.320 --> 0:42:53.960
<v Speaker 4>And what it.

0:42:53.960 --> 0:42:57.000
<v Speaker 8>Includes, it's the NFL Red Zone that's a subscription based

0:42:57.080 --> 0:43:00.840
<v Speaker 8>highlight service, the NFL network, cable chat, and also Disney

0:43:00.960 --> 0:43:04.719
<v Speaker 8>is going to get more air, more NFL games. ESPN though,

0:43:04.760 --> 0:43:07.359
<v Speaker 8>is getting ready to launch this new streaming service that's

0:43:07.400 --> 0:43:09.440
<v Speaker 8>going to cost about thirty dollars a month. So the

0:43:09.480 --> 0:43:12.799
<v Speaker 8>timing on this is pretty good. On top of that, though,

0:43:12.800 --> 0:43:14.640
<v Speaker 8>the Wall Street Journal actually just put it on an

0:43:14.680 --> 0:43:19.080
<v Speaker 8>article that says Disney bought exclusive rights to manywwees high

0:43:19.080 --> 0:43:21.839
<v Speaker 8>profile events for one and a half, just one hour.

0:43:22.520 --> 0:43:25.359
<v Speaker 2>The Sweeten cam is going nuts right now. You're over

0:43:25.440 --> 0:43:27.800
<v Speaker 2>there squirm and yeah, I mean, is this the future?

0:43:28.480 --> 0:43:31.040
<v Speaker 4>Well, it's a great move I think by ESPN and

0:43:31.120 --> 0:43:34.960
<v Speaker 4>Disney just to cement its relationship with the NFL. With

0:43:35.080 --> 0:43:37.360
<v Speaker 4>all the competition that is likely to come in for

0:43:37.440 --> 0:43:40.520
<v Speaker 4>distribution from Amazon than all the other streamers.

0:43:40.600 --> 0:43:46.480
<v Speaker 2>It's just kind of real journalistic independence. Yeah, I'm sure

0:43:46.480 --> 0:43:47.520
<v Speaker 2>there will be. It's fine.

0:43:47.560 --> 0:43:49.600
<v Speaker 4>They're already tied at the hip. I mean, they're already

0:43:49.640 --> 0:43:52.040
<v Speaker 4>tied at the hip anyway. This just kind of codifies

0:43:52.040 --> 0:43:53.840
<v Speaker 4>it and again in a world where there's going to

0:43:53.880 --> 0:43:56.880
<v Speaker 4>be more and more competition to get that NFL programming,

0:43:56.880 --> 0:43:59.600
<v Speaker 4>which is the most valuable in the world. ESPN's now

0:43:59.600 --> 0:44:01.440
<v Speaker 4>got a really good position, I think.

0:44:01.560 --> 0:44:02.280
<v Speaker 2>So we'll see.

0:44:02.920 --> 0:44:04.600
<v Speaker 8>I think. So I look at it and I'm like, okay,

0:44:04.640 --> 0:44:06.920
<v Speaker 8>maybe I can cut the cable cord now because all

0:44:07.000 --> 0:44:09.600
<v Speaker 8>my husband watches cable furs for the sports part of it.

0:44:09.600 --> 0:44:10.520
<v Speaker 5>In the NFL.

0:44:11.840 --> 0:44:13.560
<v Speaker 8>Seppens it's sports.

0:44:13.600 --> 0:44:14.200
<v Speaker 6>It's huge.

0:44:15.200 --> 0:44:15.560
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:44:15.640 --> 0:44:17.719
<v Speaker 8>So this next story I thought of you, Paul, because

0:44:17.719 --> 0:44:19.600
<v Speaker 8>I remember you said you go to resorts and at

0:44:19.640 --> 0:44:21.759
<v Speaker 8>the end of it, you get this big bill, right,

0:44:21.880 --> 0:44:26.600
<v Speaker 8>all the kids, smoothies like everything. So more people are

0:44:26.800 --> 0:44:30.360
<v Speaker 8>enjoying these all inclusive resorts so where everything is included

0:44:30.400 --> 0:44:32.120
<v Speaker 8>so you don't get the big bill at the end.

0:44:32.760 --> 0:44:36.520
<v Speaker 8>And hotels like Hyatt Marriott, they're trying to get the affluent, yes,

0:44:36.560 --> 0:44:39.799
<v Speaker 8>the customers. It's going to run you maybe about one

0:44:39.800 --> 0:44:42.919
<v Speaker 8>thousand dollars a night for you know, the first year.

0:44:43.160 --> 0:44:46.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I did it, and I kept very careful track

0:44:46.120 --> 0:44:48.879
<v Speaker 2>and I decided it was fair. It was worth it.

0:44:48.880 --> 0:44:51.799
<v Speaker 2>It was yeah, borderline worth it. But yeah, the weight

0:44:51.880 --> 0:44:55.120
<v Speaker 2>of not having the smoothie bill at the end, or

0:44:55.200 --> 0:44:58.520
<v Speaker 2>excuse me, the rum punch bill exactly.

0:44:59.080 --> 0:45:00.399
<v Speaker 4>So we're all and we do it in a room

0:45:00.480 --> 0:45:00.839
<v Speaker 4>every year.

0:45:00.920 --> 0:45:03.120
<v Speaker 2>So this is build you, this is buildings.

0:45:03.400 --> 0:45:06.320
<v Speaker 8>So it is okay. So you have like Marriott, for example,

0:45:06.360 --> 0:45:09.440
<v Speaker 8>they just bought their first all inclusive W resort, Punta

0:45:09.520 --> 0:45:11.000
<v Speaker 8>Khana and the Dominican.

0:45:10.560 --> 0:45:12.360
<v Speaker 2>Republic check it out.

0:45:12.920 --> 0:45:15.440
<v Speaker 8>Last year they had their first Marriout branded in Cancun.

0:45:15.640 --> 0:45:18.719
<v Speaker 8>Even Hiatt they have about ten all inclusive brands. So

0:45:18.800 --> 0:45:20.920
<v Speaker 8>it's this is something that's really starting to build. But

0:45:21.000 --> 0:45:24.000
<v Speaker 8>they're gearing it like they're putting it on steroids. You know.

0:45:24.040 --> 0:45:25.560
<v Speaker 8>It's like, you know, a thousand.

0:45:25.160 --> 0:45:26.320
<v Speaker 6>Dollars for two people.

0:45:28.480 --> 0:45:31.000
<v Speaker 8>At that price, I don't. I don't know if I would.

0:45:31.320 --> 0:45:32.480
<v Speaker 8>I don't eat that much.

0:45:34.520 --> 0:45:35.359
<v Speaker 4>Salary every day.

0:45:35.440 --> 0:45:37.680
<v Speaker 2>Are you do you go to a resort like that?

0:45:37.760 --> 0:45:39.040
<v Speaker 2>Are you doing pilates?

0:45:39.800 --> 0:45:40.319
<v Speaker 3>You have to?

0:45:40.480 --> 0:45:41.839
<v Speaker 8>I go to the gym every day when I.

0:45:41.800 --> 0:45:42.360
<v Speaker 2>Go on vacation.

0:45:43.600 --> 0:45:47.600
<v Speaker 8>Next the people are okay, this one's going to get

0:45:47.640 --> 0:45:50.600
<v Speaker 8>you fired up to Okay. So this is Microsoft. They're

0:45:50.640 --> 0:45:54.400
<v Speaker 8>getting this more strict return to the office policy, sources

0:45:54.400 --> 0:45:57.800
<v Speaker 8>telling Business Insider employees could be coming back more often. Okay,

0:45:57.840 --> 0:46:01.279
<v Speaker 8>so right now they let employees work mostly remote as

0:46:01.360 --> 0:46:03.600
<v Speaker 8>much as fifty percent of the time. Sometimes they're a

0:46:03.600 --> 0:46:06.279
<v Speaker 8>little bit flexible. But the new policy is going to

0:46:06.320 --> 0:46:09.279
<v Speaker 8>require them to work in the office at least three

0:46:09.360 --> 0:46:09.839
<v Speaker 8>days a week.

0:46:09.920 --> 0:46:13.919
<v Speaker 2>Oh boy, what Business Insiders Holly doing a great job

0:46:13.960 --> 0:46:15.640
<v Speaker 2>on this with at Yes.

0:46:15.600 --> 0:46:16.319
<v Speaker 8>Yes they do.

0:46:16.320 --> 0:46:19.600
<v Speaker 2>They get there's just like you know, admirable Boom in

0:46:19.600 --> 0:46:22.360
<v Speaker 2>the in the wind on Mary Poppins. There's something going

0:46:22.400 --> 0:46:24.120
<v Speaker 2>on in August this year.

0:46:24.400 --> 0:46:26.640
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, but it could because you've seen like a lot

0:46:26.680 --> 0:46:29.280
<v Speaker 8>of especially tech companies starting to do this, like getting

0:46:29.320 --> 0:46:31.400
<v Speaker 8>the more back to the office, being a little bit

0:46:31.400 --> 0:46:31.920
<v Speaker 8>more strict.

0:46:31.960 --> 0:46:33.920
<v Speaker 5>But hey, three days, I don't know.

0:46:34.120 --> 0:46:37.200
<v Speaker 2>Listam tato, Thank you so much the newspapers this morning.

0:46:37.440 --> 0:46:42.200
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast, available on Apple, Spotify

0:46:42.320 --> 0:46:46.120
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each

0:46:46.160 --> 0:46:49.960
<v Speaker 1>weekday seven to ten am Easter and on Bloomberg dot com,

0:46:50.120 --> 0:46:53.920
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:46:54.239 --> 0:46:57.360
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:46:57.640 --> 0:46:59.640
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg terminal