WEBVTT - From the Vault: Animals Throwing Stuff, Part 3

0:00:06.120 --> 0:00:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Hey, you welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind. My

0:00:08.000 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>name is Robert.

0:00:08.600 --> 0:00:11.560
<v Speaker 2>Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick, and it's Saturday. Time to

0:00:11.600 --> 0:00:13.720
<v Speaker 2>go into the vault for an older episode of the show.

0:00:13.840 --> 0:00:17.680
<v Speaker 2>This one originally published January tenth, twenty twenty three, and

0:00:17.920 --> 0:00:21.200
<v Speaker 2>it is part three in our series on throwing behavior

0:00:21.280 --> 0:00:25.040
<v Speaker 2>in non human animals and what else is there to say?

0:00:25.480 --> 0:00:37.200
<v Speaker 3>Enjoy Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind production of iHeartRadio.

0:00:39.080 --> 0:00:41.559
<v Speaker 1>Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind. My name

0:00:41.600 --> 0:00:42.199
<v Speaker 1>is Robert.

0:00:42.040 --> 0:00:44.760
<v Speaker 2>Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick, and we're back with part

0:00:44.920 --> 0:00:49.640
<v Speaker 2>three in our series I'm throwing behavior in animals, especially

0:00:49.680 --> 0:00:52.360
<v Speaker 2>non human animals, but we'll be talking about throwing of

0:00:52.360 --> 0:00:56.440
<v Speaker 2>the human variety some today now. In previous episodes, we

0:00:56.560 --> 0:01:00.240
<v Speaker 2>discussed a paper documenting a kind of throwing or what

0:01:00.320 --> 0:01:04.040
<v Speaker 2>appeared to be a kind of throwing in octopuses in Australia,

0:01:04.160 --> 0:01:08.039
<v Speaker 2>which use their siphons to blast clouds of silt in

0:01:08.080 --> 0:01:10.880
<v Speaker 2>their neighbors' faces when they get a little too close.

0:01:11.640 --> 0:01:14.920
<v Speaker 2>We discussed the ability of elephants to throw with their trunks,

0:01:15.319 --> 0:01:19.520
<v Speaker 2>and we talked about mongooses doing brutal reverse granny shots

0:01:19.560 --> 0:01:23.399
<v Speaker 2>to bypass the defenses of armored millipedes and, as Mick

0:01:23.480 --> 0:01:28.200
<v Speaker 2>Jagger would say, get the meat. Today, our discussion continues

0:01:28.240 --> 0:01:29.840
<v Speaker 2>with a very important consideration.

0:01:30.400 --> 0:01:33.440
<v Speaker 1>Well, when I told my wife that this was the

0:01:33.480 --> 0:01:37.320
<v Speaker 1>topic we were going to be covering, the question she asked, goes, well,

0:01:37.360 --> 0:01:39.960
<v Speaker 1>what about Airbud? Are you going to talk about Airbud?

0:01:40.560 --> 0:01:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Handle the air Bud.

0:01:41.720 --> 0:01:44.280
<v Speaker 2>Question a very important facet of this issue.

0:01:44.360 --> 0:01:47.600
<v Speaker 1>Yes, Airbud is, of course a nineteen ninety seven motion

0:01:47.720 --> 0:01:51.960
<v Speaker 1>picture about a dog that plays competitive basketball based on

0:01:52.080 --> 0:01:54.960
<v Speaker 1>the At this point, I think classic sports movie trope.

0:01:55.400 --> 0:01:57.640
<v Speaker 1>There's nothing in the rule book that says a blank

0:01:57.920 --> 0:02:00.720
<v Speaker 1>can't play whatever the sport happens to be, And you

0:02:00.720 --> 0:02:04.240
<v Speaker 1>can put into that blank basically any animal, whatever animal

0:02:04.320 --> 0:02:09.360
<v Speaker 1>seems doable from a movie making standpoint and acceptable to

0:02:09.400 --> 0:02:11.800
<v Speaker 1>the human imagination. And I guess you could ultimately go

0:02:11.840 --> 0:02:14.760
<v Speaker 1>beyond the realm of humans into other things as long

0:02:14.800 --> 0:02:17.680
<v Speaker 1>as you could somehow cobble together a script around it.

0:02:17.800 --> 0:02:20.079
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I don't know if I've ever seen another one

0:02:20.080 --> 0:02:21.639
<v Speaker 2>of these. I think I saw Airbud when I was

0:02:21.680 --> 0:02:24.639
<v Speaker 2>a kid, But I know it's a tradition right there,

0:02:24.639 --> 0:02:27.680
<v Speaker 2>you know, there's a million movies like Jeremy the Football Horse.

0:02:29.280 --> 0:02:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Well, yeah, I think one of the earliest, if not

0:02:31.880 --> 0:02:33.799
<v Speaker 1>the earliest, examples of this. And I could be wrong,

0:02:33.840 --> 0:02:36.680
<v Speaker 1>because this is not a subgenre that I have personally

0:02:36.760 --> 0:02:38.880
<v Speaker 1>explored a lot. But I do remember seeing parts of

0:02:38.880 --> 0:02:42.080
<v Speaker 1>this one on TV the nineteen seventy six movie Gus,

0:02:42.440 --> 0:02:45.000
<v Speaker 1>which also had Ed Asner and Don Knot sent it

0:02:45.200 --> 0:02:47.720
<v Speaker 1>to give you an idea of the you know, the

0:02:47.760 --> 0:02:50.000
<v Speaker 1>caliber of talent that was involved in this, But it

0:02:50.040 --> 0:02:52.600
<v Speaker 1>was about a terrible NFL team. I think there's something

0:02:52.680 --> 0:02:56.720
<v Speaker 1>like the California Atomics or something, and they end up

0:02:56.760 --> 0:03:00.640
<v Speaker 1>deciding to field a donkey as a kicker in the game,

0:03:01.320 --> 0:03:05.480
<v Speaker 1>and I guess it works out for them. Again, there's

0:03:05.480 --> 0:03:07.520
<v Speaker 1>nothing in the rule, but this says a donkey can't

0:03:07.560 --> 0:03:08.880
<v Speaker 1>play inn FL.

0:03:09.200 --> 0:03:13.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I imagine movies like this must just encourage an

0:03:13.480 --> 0:03:19.560
<v Speaker 2>overly stringent form of legalism when it comes to professional sports. Yeah, Like,

0:03:19.840 --> 0:03:22.680
<v Speaker 2>does it say games must take place on planet Earth

0:03:22.760 --> 0:03:23.440
<v Speaker 2>and so forth?

0:03:24.080 --> 0:03:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? Yeah, they will at this point. Surely the future

0:03:26.680 --> 0:03:29.360
<v Speaker 1>proof things. But if we're going just based on these films,

0:03:29.400 --> 0:03:32.400
<v Speaker 1>it would seem that for a while they didn't have

0:03:32.480 --> 0:03:35.480
<v Speaker 1>all the loopholes filled in on this, and and people

0:03:35.480 --> 0:03:38.120
<v Speaker 1>were just constantly rolling out new animals, like it doesn't

0:03:38.120 --> 0:03:41.880
<v Speaker 1>say anything about ardvarks. So ardvarks are in play huh

0:03:42.120 --> 0:03:47.240
<v Speaker 1>in Professional Curly Yes, okay. But outside of Gus and Airbud,

0:03:47.520 --> 0:03:51.600
<v Speaker 1>you also have movies like two thousands MVP Most Valuable Primate,

0:03:51.680 --> 0:03:55.200
<v Speaker 1>in which a chimpanzee plays soccer. There are also I

0:03:55.200 --> 0:03:58.840
<v Speaker 1>think thirteen additional Airbud sequels and spin offs.

0:03:59.760 --> 0:04:03.440
<v Speaker 2>Human they're also primates. All existing soccer players are primates.

0:04:04.240 --> 0:04:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Well, tell the producers of MVP Most Valuable Primate about that.

0:04:10.520 --> 0:04:12.440
<v Speaker 1>They maybe they actually touched on in the screenplay, but

0:04:12.480 --> 0:04:12.960
<v Speaker 1>I doubt it.

0:04:13.120 --> 0:04:15.720
<v Speaker 2>But I'm sorry you were. How many air Bud movies

0:04:15.760 --> 0:04:16.159
<v Speaker 2>are there?

0:04:16.760 --> 0:04:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Thirteen by Mike count, That includes the air Buddies like

0:04:23.320 --> 0:04:27.520
<v Speaker 1>spinoff series, and interestingly enough, two thousand and six is

0:04:27.600 --> 0:04:30.960
<v Speaker 1>air Buddies. That was Don Nottt's final film. He voiced

0:04:30.960 --> 0:04:31.880
<v Speaker 1>a bloodhound in it.

0:04:32.240 --> 0:04:32.880
<v Speaker 2>Oh.

0:04:33.000 --> 0:04:35.279
<v Speaker 1>Now, I don't know. Does that that means animals talk

0:04:35.400 --> 0:04:37.880
<v Speaker 1>in air Buddies. I don't know if animals talked in Airbud.

0:04:38.120 --> 0:04:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps you remember, I don't remember.

0:04:41.320 --> 0:04:44.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm inclined to think not. I think the Dog and

0:04:44.240 --> 0:04:47.800
<v Speaker 2>Air Bud was silent. But yeah, well, but by the

0:04:47.800 --> 0:04:50.200
<v Speaker 2>time they get into the Buddies movies, which by the way,

0:04:50.240 --> 0:04:54.680
<v Speaker 2>descend into titles like Space Buddies and Santa Buddies. As

0:04:54.720 --> 0:04:56.640
<v Speaker 2>far as I can tell, these are just an excuse

0:04:56.680 --> 0:04:59.320
<v Speaker 2>to have a screen full of Golden Retriever puppies for

0:04:59.360 --> 0:05:04.919
<v Speaker 2>eighty minutes. I think it is absolutely crass mercenary filmmaking.

0:05:05.000 --> 0:05:09.640
<v Speaker 2>It's just ultimate cute exploitation. But this was also the

0:05:09.680 --> 0:05:13.320
<v Speaker 2>series that in an episode long ago, we suggested should

0:05:13.320 --> 0:05:16.000
<v Speaker 2>do a crossover with the Clive Barker verse and create

0:05:16.080 --> 0:05:16.760
<v Speaker 2>hell Buddies.

0:05:19.560 --> 0:05:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Now. There's also just real quick a few other mentions.

0:05:22.080 --> 0:05:25.080
<v Speaker 1>There's nineteen ninety nine Soccer Dog, the movie. There's two

0:05:25.120 --> 0:05:28.200
<v Speaker 1>thousand and five's The Karate Dog, and then there's the

0:05:28.320 --> 0:05:32.520
<v Speaker 1>nineteen ninety six movie Ed, in which a chimpanzee plays baseball. Oh,

0:05:32.520 --> 0:05:35.960
<v Speaker 1>and then there's nineteen seventy eight's Matilda about a boxing kangaroo.

0:05:36.480 --> 0:05:40.159
<v Speaker 1>That one has interested me because I noticed its stars

0:05:40.200 --> 0:05:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Elliott Gould, and it was also one of the films

0:05:43.600 --> 0:05:46.920
<v Speaker 1>you could pull up on the Criterion Collections streaming service

0:05:47.160 --> 0:05:49.040
<v Speaker 1>at least several months back.

0:05:49.400 --> 0:05:52.400
<v Speaker 2>Boxing kangaroo. Is that a waltzing Matilda joke?

0:05:53.600 --> 0:05:56.920
<v Speaker 1>I imagine? So yeah, And I looked a little bit

0:05:56.920 --> 0:06:01.480
<v Speaker 1>into this related to this podcast episod, and I quickly realized, Oh, well,

0:06:01.480 --> 0:06:05.640
<v Speaker 1>the boxing kangaroo is a whole thing unto itself that

0:06:05.839 --> 0:06:09.680
<v Speaker 1>does have some basis in kangaroo behavior, but often in

0:06:09.720 --> 0:06:13.640
<v Speaker 1>like a misinterpretation of kangaroo defensive behavior. But it has

0:06:13.720 --> 0:06:15.359
<v Speaker 1>kind of like a life of its own outside of

0:06:15.360 --> 0:06:17.680
<v Speaker 1>this particular picture. It might be something to come back

0:06:17.720 --> 0:06:18.360
<v Speaker 1>to in the future.

0:06:18.880 --> 0:06:21.039
<v Speaker 2>Now, one more thing about the Airbud franchise. You know,

0:06:21.120 --> 0:06:23.600
<v Speaker 2>before they get to air Buddies, I think you were

0:06:23.640 --> 0:06:27.000
<v Speaker 2>saying that the Golden Retrievers end up doing a bunch

0:06:27.040 --> 0:06:29.960
<v Speaker 2>of different sports, and they've all got puns in the titles.

0:06:30.000 --> 0:06:33.240
<v Speaker 2>So the one where Airbud does baseball is called Airbud

0:06:33.400 --> 0:06:35.080
<v Speaker 2>Seventh Inning Fetch.

0:06:37.600 --> 0:06:40.200
<v Speaker 1>You got to get some puns in there, all right.

0:06:40.240 --> 0:06:43.480
<v Speaker 1>But bringing it all back around to today's episode, Okay,

0:06:43.880 --> 0:06:45.960
<v Speaker 1>some of these we can just instantly dismiss for now.

0:06:45.960 --> 0:06:49.120
<v Speaker 1>We don't need to concern ourselves with boxing kangaroos or

0:06:49.600 --> 0:06:53.279
<v Speaker 1>karate dogs because these do not involve throwing. You know,

0:06:53.480 --> 0:06:55.480
<v Speaker 1>we're going to focus on the sports that involve throwing

0:06:55.480 --> 0:07:00.440
<v Speaker 1>a ball. Gus, that's impressive, but he's a kicker. Despite

0:07:00.720 --> 0:07:02.279
<v Speaker 1>just participating in a game that has a lot of

0:07:02.279 --> 0:07:04.640
<v Speaker 1>throwing in it doesn't seem to be throwing anything. So

0:07:04.720 --> 0:07:06.560
<v Speaker 1>we really only have to worry about the concept of

0:07:06.600 --> 0:07:10.480
<v Speaker 1>dogs playing scoring games with balls and chimpanzees playing scoring

0:07:10.520 --> 0:07:15.240
<v Speaker 1>games with balls. Real quick, let's talk about dogs. And

0:07:15.560 --> 0:07:19.920
<v Speaker 1>you may have additional expertise on this to throw in

0:07:19.960 --> 0:07:23.760
<v Speaker 1>here experience from being a dog owner. But as far

0:07:23.800 --> 0:07:26.280
<v Speaker 1>as dogs go, they can obviously be trained to do

0:07:26.320 --> 0:07:29.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of different things, often very impressive things, including chasing,

0:07:29.440 --> 0:07:32.680
<v Speaker 1>after catching, and fetching balls and sticks, and as is

0:07:32.720 --> 0:07:35.480
<v Speaker 1>evident in many videos online, they can also be trained

0:07:35.520 --> 0:07:39.680
<v Speaker 1>to bounce basketballs into baskets off of their noses, off

0:07:39.680 --> 0:07:40.680
<v Speaker 1>of their snouts.

0:07:41.320 --> 0:07:43.560
<v Speaker 2>That always, I don't know, Like a basketball is a

0:07:43.640 --> 0:07:47.560
<v Speaker 2>fairly massive object. I would think booping a basketball in

0:07:47.640 --> 0:07:50.160
<v Speaker 2>midflight with the snout would really kind of hurt.

0:07:50.520 --> 0:07:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm not sure, but I looked around, and as

0:07:54.840 --> 0:07:59.480
<v Speaker 1>far as dogs throwing, I'm not so certain about this. Drops. Yes,

0:07:59.560 --> 0:08:02.520
<v Speaker 1>they can. You'll see plenty of examples of dogs catching

0:08:02.560 --> 0:08:06.760
<v Speaker 1>things dropping them, But I'm not sure. I'm not sure

0:08:06.760 --> 0:08:10.400
<v Speaker 1>you really have anything like throwing even kind of a

0:08:10.440 --> 0:08:12.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, a tossing aside of a stick.

0:08:12.040 --> 0:08:14.600
<v Speaker 2>Or a ball, well, not targeted throwing. I mean, I

0:08:14.640 --> 0:08:18.320
<v Speaker 2>think what's quite common for dogs is something more like

0:08:18.360 --> 0:08:23.800
<v Speaker 2>what the mongoose did with the millipede. Dogs will, especially

0:08:24.200 --> 0:08:27.160
<v Speaker 2>dogs that have been trained in kind of unusual environments,

0:08:27.200 --> 0:08:32.240
<v Speaker 2>with say a puzzle type treat retrieval toy, you know,

0:08:32.320 --> 0:08:36.200
<v Speaker 2>so you have like some kind of toy where the

0:08:36.240 --> 0:08:38.959
<v Speaker 2>treat is hidden inside and the dog has to manipulate

0:08:39.000 --> 0:08:40.880
<v Speaker 2>the toy to get the treat out of the middle.

0:08:41.720 --> 0:08:44.920
<v Speaker 2>In those cases, I've seen dogs throwing the toy in

0:08:45.000 --> 0:08:48.520
<v Speaker 2>order to try to extract the treat, but it's very haphazard.

0:08:48.559 --> 0:08:51.040
<v Speaker 2>They're not like hitting a target. They're more just kind

0:08:51.040 --> 0:08:54.080
<v Speaker 2>of like throwing it wildly by tossing their head and

0:08:54.160 --> 0:08:56.439
<v Speaker 2>it'll bounce off the wall or something, and maybe the

0:08:56.760 --> 0:08:57.720
<v Speaker 2>treat will tumble out.

0:08:59.240 --> 0:09:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Now. I also some discussions and some papers about the

0:09:03.080 --> 0:09:06.880
<v Speaker 1>possibility that a dog using a chewing stick is essentially

0:09:06.920 --> 0:09:08.880
<v Speaker 1>a form of tool use, and this would also apply

0:09:08.920 --> 0:09:12.000
<v Speaker 1>to any other animal that uses a stick in such

0:09:12.040 --> 0:09:14.840
<v Speaker 1>a fashion. So that's an interesting idea. To consider.

0:09:15.440 --> 0:09:18.360
<v Speaker 2>Hmmm, yeah, you can make that argument, I guess by

0:09:18.400 --> 0:09:20.679
<v Speaker 2>the same token, you could say, like a bear scratching

0:09:20.720 --> 0:09:22.920
<v Speaker 2>its butt against a tree would be a form of

0:09:22.960 --> 0:09:23.560
<v Speaker 2>tool use.

0:09:24.080 --> 0:09:29.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Chimps, However, chimps are a different case entirely. So

0:09:29.400 --> 0:09:32.280
<v Speaker 1>we're not saying that chimpanzees should be encouraged to play

0:09:32.360 --> 0:09:35.560
<v Speaker 1>baseball or soccer or any other professional sport or any

0:09:35.600 --> 0:09:38.440
<v Speaker 1>sport for that matter. But they have certainly demonstrated their

0:09:38.559 --> 0:09:41.520
<v Speaker 1>use of tools in both captivity and in the wild.

0:09:42.320 --> 0:09:46.040
<v Speaker 1>And this includes the targeted use of thrown objects. Now,

0:09:46.080 --> 0:09:48.760
<v Speaker 1>one of the objects or substances I guess observed to

0:09:48.800 --> 0:09:51.000
<v Speaker 1>be thrown a lot, and this is something that is

0:09:51.000 --> 0:09:53.960
<v Speaker 1>of course well documented online. In fact, when we were

0:09:54.200 --> 0:09:57.400
<v Speaker 1>researching other aspects of animals throwing things, some of the

0:09:57.400 --> 0:10:00.760
<v Speaker 1>search engines I was using, We're very excited to give

0:10:00.800 --> 0:10:06.760
<v Speaker 1>me content of animals throwing feces, particularly chimps throwing feces.

0:10:07.280 --> 0:10:09.760
<v Speaker 1>I was not looking for this information at the time,

0:10:09.840 --> 0:10:11.920
<v Speaker 1>but the Internet really wanted to desert it to me.

0:10:12.080 --> 0:10:12.880
<v Speaker 2>Uh huh.

0:10:13.040 --> 0:10:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Now this kind of goes back into something we talked

0:10:14.800 --> 0:10:17.440
<v Speaker 1>about earlier, the question if you're doing something with something

0:10:17.440 --> 0:10:19.719
<v Speaker 1>that came from your own body, is it truly tool use?

0:10:20.280 --> 0:10:21.800
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. I mean, I guess when I was

0:10:21.840 --> 0:10:24.920
<v Speaker 2>thinking about substances that come out of an animal's own body,

0:10:25.520 --> 0:10:28.640
<v Speaker 2>I was thinking about like things like spider silk, or

0:10:28.720 --> 0:10:33.120
<v Speaker 2>like the irticating hairs that come off of a tarantula's back,

0:10:33.760 --> 0:10:38.320
<v Speaker 2>where the ways in which these substances are used are

0:10:38.400 --> 0:10:42.120
<v Speaker 2>not very generalized, They're not very free form. Instead, they

0:10:42.160 --> 0:10:49.119
<v Speaker 2>seem to be pretty tightly controlled, instinctually determined behavioral patterns,

0:10:49.520 --> 0:10:51.640
<v Speaker 2>whereas I don't know, you could say, maybe like a

0:10:51.720 --> 0:10:54.800
<v Speaker 2>chimpanzee pooping and then throwing its poop at someone or

0:10:54.840 --> 0:10:57.720
<v Speaker 2>something that seems to be a little more free form.

0:10:58.120 --> 0:11:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I guess. Also, and this is not something that

0:11:00.520 --> 0:11:02.600
<v Speaker 1>any of the papers I looked that got into, But

0:11:02.600 --> 0:11:07.200
<v Speaker 1>I guess there's a difference between poop directly delivered to

0:11:07.240 --> 0:11:09.760
<v Speaker 1>the hand and then thrown and like poop that is

0:11:09.840 --> 0:11:12.640
<v Speaker 1>just like say, in a creature's habitat or in its

0:11:12.679 --> 0:11:15.960
<v Speaker 1>general area that it then picks up, maybe not even

0:11:16.000 --> 0:11:19.600
<v Speaker 1>its own poop. So I guess we'd have to consider

0:11:19.640 --> 0:11:20.200
<v Speaker 1>that as well.

0:11:20.720 --> 0:11:22.360
<v Speaker 2>Now, I do think we should be clear that feces

0:11:22.400 --> 0:11:25.640
<v Speaker 2>are not the only objects that apes like chimpanzees throw,

0:11:25.800 --> 0:11:29.000
<v Speaker 2>but it is a feces are often observed to be thrown,

0:11:29.160 --> 0:11:30.840
<v Speaker 2>especially in captivity.

0:11:30.920 --> 0:11:35.240
<v Speaker 1>I think, yes, yeah, definitely. The sources I was looking

0:11:35.280 --> 0:11:40.359
<v Speaker 1>at were definitely mentioning this because in captivity, especially historically,

0:11:40.720 --> 0:11:43.960
<v Speaker 1>there are often less things for the animal to interact with.

0:11:44.400 --> 0:11:47.400
<v Speaker 1>The poop is something that will happen eventually, will be

0:11:47.480 --> 0:11:50.880
<v Speaker 1>in the enclosure, and therefore is available to pick up, manipulate,

0:11:50.920 --> 0:11:53.960
<v Speaker 1>and throw if desired, whereas in the wild there are

0:11:54.120 --> 0:11:57.360
<v Speaker 1>other competitors out there, the other things that could pick up,

0:11:57.559 --> 0:12:00.680
<v Speaker 1>like sticks, like rocks that could be thrown, and we

0:12:00.840 --> 0:12:03.880
<v Speaker 1>have seen them throw such objects both in captivity but

0:12:03.960 --> 0:12:06.640
<v Speaker 1>also in the wild, and so it seems to be

0:12:06.679 --> 0:12:10.040
<v Speaker 1>a situation where there are far more incidents of poop

0:12:10.080 --> 0:12:12.600
<v Speaker 1>throwing in captivity versus the wild, though they have been

0:12:12.640 --> 0:12:14.280
<v Speaker 1>observed to throw poop in the wild as well.

0:12:14.760 --> 0:12:18.040
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, I guess I would not disqualify something from

0:12:18.120 --> 0:12:21.400
<v Speaker 2>counting as tool use just because it consists of an

0:12:21.440 --> 0:12:24.120
<v Speaker 2>animal's own excreta or something that came out of their body.

0:12:24.120 --> 0:12:26.280
<v Speaker 2>I mean you could use poop, I suppose, as a

0:12:26.320 --> 0:12:27.680
<v Speaker 2>tool for all kinds of things.

0:12:28.720 --> 0:12:32.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, this is kind of a tangent, but I

0:12:32.520 --> 0:12:34.800
<v Speaker 1>was looking around and back. In twenty seventeen, a team

0:12:34.800 --> 0:12:37.319
<v Speaker 1>from the University of Calgary hosted a competition to make

0:12:37.440 --> 0:12:40.920
<v Speaker 1>use of astronaut waste, and the winning submission was titled

0:12:41.200 --> 0:12:46.360
<v Speaker 1>Astroplastic from Colon to Colony, in which the DNA of

0:12:46.400 --> 0:12:50.040
<v Speaker 1>an E. Coli bacteria was modified so that it removed

0:12:50.080 --> 0:12:53.679
<v Speaker 1>acids from human feces, and they did not use actual

0:12:53.679 --> 0:12:55.880
<v Speaker 1>poop in the experiment. It used like a mixture of

0:12:55.920 --> 0:12:59.360
<v Speaker 1>things to simulate poop. But the idea was here that

0:12:59.440 --> 0:13:04.959
<v Speaker 1>this this modified E. Coli would produce a plastic that

0:13:05.080 --> 0:13:07.280
<v Speaker 1>can then be used in a three D printer to

0:13:07.320 --> 0:13:10.880
<v Speaker 1>produce simple tools like wrenches and screwdrivers. So the aim

0:13:10.960 --> 0:13:14.440
<v Speaker 1>here would be sort of twofold. So say you're going

0:13:14.440 --> 0:13:17.160
<v Speaker 1>to Mars on an extended mission. This way you don't

0:13:17.200 --> 0:13:18.840
<v Speaker 1>have to bring those tools with you. You don't have to

0:13:18.840 --> 0:13:22.360
<v Speaker 1>pay for the cost of getting those tools into orbit

0:13:22.520 --> 0:13:26.040
<v Speaker 1>and then to Mars, and then likewise you have to

0:13:26.520 --> 0:13:30.360
<v Speaker 1>worry less about getting rid of human waste on the journey.

0:13:31.360 --> 0:13:34.480
<v Speaker 1>That's quite brilliant. Yes, I one day hope to have

0:13:34.520 --> 0:13:39.520
<v Speaker 1>all kinds of plastic tools and toys made out of poop. Now,

0:13:40.080 --> 0:13:42.439
<v Speaker 1>this is sort of another aside, but this gets back

0:13:42.480 --> 0:13:46.280
<v Speaker 1>to chimps specifically, if you might get into the question

0:13:46.320 --> 0:13:51.000
<v Speaker 1>of why do chimps throw poop specifically, even if they

0:13:51.000 --> 0:13:54.400
<v Speaker 1>have a choice of their objects to throw? And I

0:13:54.480 --> 0:13:57.720
<v Speaker 1>found this rather fascinating older paper. This is from nineteen

0:13:57.760 --> 0:14:01.880
<v Speaker 1>ninety six. It is a rush and paper titled a

0:14:01.960 --> 0:14:05.680
<v Speaker 1>neglected form of quasi aggression in Apes Possible relevance for

0:14:05.760 --> 0:14:09.320
<v Speaker 1>the origins of humor. This was the current anthropology and

0:14:09.360 --> 0:14:10.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm just going to read a quote from it here.

0:14:11.520 --> 0:14:14.400
<v Speaker 1>According to people working at the Pavlov Center, at least

0:14:14.400 --> 0:14:17.600
<v Speaker 1>four adult chimpanzee males and one adult female would also

0:14:17.679 --> 0:14:20.960
<v Speaker 1>throw feces at people, expressing joy when the target was

0:14:21.040 --> 0:14:25.520
<v Speaker 1>hit by making a playface, hooting, clapping, and stamping around.

0:14:25.640 --> 0:14:28.840
<v Speaker 1>They did not, however, throw feces at persons of whom

0:14:28.960 --> 0:14:32.240
<v Speaker 1>they were afraid. We have received the same information from

0:14:32.240 --> 0:14:35.120
<v Speaker 1>people in charge of chimpanzees at the Saint Petersburg and

0:14:35.200 --> 0:14:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Moscow zoos at the Moscow Zoo. The same behavior was

0:14:38.400 --> 0:14:39.600
<v Speaker 1>observed in orangutanks.

0:14:39.880 --> 0:14:44.920
<v Speaker 2>Hmmm, so at least in these cases the chimpanzees seemed

0:14:44.920 --> 0:14:47.680
<v Speaker 2>to get a real hoot out of hitting somebody with

0:14:47.760 --> 0:14:48.200
<v Speaker 2>some poop.

0:14:49.080 --> 0:14:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and again this is older research, and I detect

0:14:52.000 --> 0:14:55.240
<v Speaker 1>at least a little bit of anthropomorphizing here, But the

0:14:55.280 --> 0:14:58.520
<v Speaker 1>distinction about fear was very interesting. So maybe in this

0:14:58.560 --> 0:15:01.760
<v Speaker 1>we do see the roots of something like humor. But

0:15:02.080 --> 0:15:06.680
<v Speaker 1>elsewhere primatologists do seem to agree that throwing poop, stone, sticks, etc.

0:15:07.000 --> 0:15:11.360
<v Speaker 1>And primates is often an act of communication, which matches

0:15:11.440 --> 0:15:13.800
<v Speaker 1>up with some of the things we've been discussing elsewhere

0:15:13.800 --> 0:15:14.440
<v Speaker 1>in this series.

0:15:14.600 --> 0:15:16.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and that we will get to in a little

0:15:16.560 --> 0:15:18.120
<v Speaker 2>bit when we talk about human evolution.

0:15:18.880 --> 0:15:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and with gimps, it's not even it's not even

0:15:23.040 --> 0:15:26.960
<v Speaker 1>a case of like of necessarily purely spontaneous communication. Like

0:15:27.040 --> 0:15:29.080
<v Speaker 1>it's easy, I think to make that leap. You think

0:15:29.120 --> 0:15:32.200
<v Speaker 1>of like an animal trying to say something, not having

0:15:32.280 --> 0:15:36.240
<v Speaker 1>the ability to say it, or having difficulty relaying that message,

0:15:36.480 --> 0:15:39.240
<v Speaker 1>and then sort of sort of spontaneously picking something up

0:15:39.280 --> 0:15:41.120
<v Speaker 1>and throwing it, or perhaps it already has something that's

0:15:41.160 --> 0:15:43.720
<v Speaker 1>hand and it throws it. And this would still be

0:15:43.920 --> 0:15:46.280
<v Speaker 1>very fascinating. I mean, even you think of like a

0:15:46.360 --> 0:15:50.400
<v Speaker 1>zoo environment, for example, the chimp is attempting interspecies communication,

0:15:51.400 --> 0:15:54.800
<v Speaker 1>even if that interspecies communication consists of throwing a rock

0:15:55.040 --> 0:15:58.280
<v Speaker 1>or some poop at somebody, right, but it's not always spontaneous.

0:15:58.320 --> 0:16:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes it is premeditated in the case of stone throwing,

0:16:02.520 --> 0:16:05.960
<v Speaker 1>that's been observed. One of the more famous examples of

0:16:06.000 --> 0:16:10.280
<v Speaker 1>this was Santino the chimpanzee born in nineteen seventy eight,

0:16:10.600 --> 0:16:14.120
<v Speaker 1>who made headlines multiple times, and I think sometimes the

0:16:14.160 --> 0:16:17.080
<v Speaker 1>news cycle would come back around to him because in

0:16:17.080 --> 0:16:21.760
<v Speaker 1>addition to being a pretty talented artist, he also had

0:16:21.800 --> 0:16:25.640
<v Speaker 1>some issues with people, like to collect stones ahead of

0:16:25.640 --> 0:16:29.120
<v Speaker 1>time so that he could throw them at visitors to

0:16:29.560 --> 0:16:32.160
<v Speaker 1>the Throuvic Zoo in Sweden.

0:16:32.480 --> 0:16:36.600
<v Speaker 2>Now that's really interesting, the collecting of stones in advance aspect,

0:16:36.600 --> 0:16:39.120
<v Speaker 2>because of course that indicates some kind of forethought or

0:16:39.160 --> 0:16:43.760
<v Speaker 2>premeditation or planning, like seeing the stone as a tool

0:16:43.960 --> 0:16:47.080
<v Speaker 2>for future use in a moment when it is not

0:16:47.360 --> 0:16:49.640
<v Speaker 2>currently needed for that use.

0:16:50.400 --> 0:16:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and apparently it wasn't an isolated incident. It's said

0:16:53.480 --> 0:16:55.920
<v Speaker 1>that he planned hundreds of stone throwing attacks on zoo

0:16:55.960 --> 0:17:01.640
<v Speaker 1>visitors over the years. Sadly from his enclosure in December

0:17:01.840 --> 0:17:04.879
<v Speaker 1>of twenty twenty two, and was subsequently shot along with

0:17:04.920 --> 0:17:09.760
<v Speaker 1>some other escapees, which was a pretty controversial incident recently.

0:17:09.800 --> 0:17:12.520
<v Speaker 1>There's a fair amount of coverage about that, but I

0:17:12.520 --> 0:17:15.359
<v Speaker 1>don't think everybody necessarily connected that this was the same

0:17:15.800 --> 0:17:18.320
<v Speaker 1>chimp that had made headlines in the past for the

0:17:18.359 --> 0:17:20.520
<v Speaker 1>throwing of rocks.

0:17:19.800 --> 0:17:20.920
<v Speaker 2>And for art apparently.

0:17:21.359 --> 0:17:23.480
<v Speaker 1>And for art. Yeah, you can find videos of him

0:17:23.520 --> 0:17:27.760
<v Speaker 1>online doing some painting, you know, manipulating of pigments on

0:17:29.320 --> 0:17:31.399
<v Speaker 1>a canvas to create some interesting works.

0:17:32.080 --> 0:17:44.400
<v Speaker 2>Well, sat in for Santino, but led an interesting life.

0:17:44.920 --> 0:17:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Now there's another interesting wrinkle in stone throwing with chimps

0:17:49.240 --> 0:17:52.080
<v Speaker 1>that I was reading about, because in the wild, chimps

0:17:52.119 --> 0:17:55.639
<v Speaker 1>will also engage in what is called a cumulative stone throwing,

0:17:56.240 --> 0:17:59.320
<v Speaker 1>as reported by cool at All in Nature Scientific Reports

0:17:59.320 --> 0:18:04.080
<v Speaker 1>back in twenty s sixteen, modern chimpanzees will actually create

0:18:04.520 --> 0:18:08.679
<v Speaker 1>stone accumulation sites that are reminiscent of human cares, of

0:18:08.800 --> 0:18:16.000
<v Speaker 1>human assemblages of stone, something that we often associate with deliberate,

0:18:17.080 --> 0:18:21.600
<v Speaker 1>cultured acts of human behavior something. And this is both

0:18:22.560 --> 0:18:26.480
<v Speaker 1>from an archaeological standpoint, when archaeologists find examples of stones

0:18:26.520 --> 0:18:29.240
<v Speaker 1>that have been gathered together in one area, and also

0:18:29.680 --> 0:18:32.639
<v Speaker 1>I think we just individually encounter this as well, whether

0:18:33.160 --> 0:18:35.600
<v Speaker 1>you see piles of stones that are put there for

0:18:35.640 --> 0:18:37.720
<v Speaker 1>a purpose, Like perhaps you're on a nature walk and

0:18:37.800 --> 0:18:41.200
<v Speaker 1>these stones are gathered together to help mark the path

0:18:41.200 --> 0:18:44.000
<v Speaker 1>you're supposed to be on, or you often see this

0:18:44.440 --> 0:18:50.159
<v Speaker 1>done out of for pure amusement. At times, you'll just

0:18:50.200 --> 0:18:52.879
<v Speaker 1>find places where humans have been around multiple stones and

0:18:52.920 --> 0:18:55.960
<v Speaker 1>there's like kind of this irresistible urge to arrange them

0:18:56.040 --> 0:18:56.920
<v Speaker 1>or stack them up.

0:18:57.840 --> 0:19:00.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and so it's interesting, But I also so I'm

0:19:00.320 --> 0:19:03.439
<v Speaker 2>hesitant to make the speculative leap here. I mean, I

0:19:03.520 --> 0:19:05.520
<v Speaker 2>know I was reading about this paper, and I know

0:19:05.560 --> 0:19:08.639
<v Speaker 2>what some people have said about the you know, the

0:19:08.680 --> 0:19:12.040
<v Speaker 2>accumulation of stones, like throwing stones into the into a

0:19:12.040 --> 0:19:16.320
<v Speaker 2>hollow tree or something until they really pile up. That suggests, well,

0:19:16.320 --> 0:19:19.919
<v Speaker 2>maybe they're creating some kind of like ritual monument, like

0:19:20.040 --> 0:19:22.040
<v Speaker 2>you know, like humans would create a care and for

0:19:22.119 --> 0:19:25.440
<v Speaker 2>some kind of purpose to be observed and to mean something.

0:19:26.080 --> 0:19:28.760
<v Speaker 2>I don't think there's really evidence present to jump to

0:19:28.840 --> 0:19:31.040
<v Speaker 2>that kind of conclusion, because that seems like a different

0:19:31.200 --> 0:19:35.359
<v Speaker 2>order of that symbolic behavior that, as far as I know,

0:19:35.520 --> 0:19:38.680
<v Speaker 2>is probably only the province of humans. But I guess

0:19:38.680 --> 0:19:40.520
<v Speaker 2>we could always be surprised. It seems kind of a

0:19:40.560 --> 0:19:44.359
<v Speaker 2>speculative leap to me, but it's still really interesting behavior. Nonetheless,

0:19:44.359 --> 0:19:48.400
<v Speaker 2>I mean that the chimpanzee is piling up the stones

0:19:48.440 --> 0:19:52.000
<v Speaker 2>for some interesting reason, even if it's not to like

0:19:52.119 --> 0:19:55.560
<v Speaker 2>create a symbolic marker for other chimpanzees to see.

0:19:56.640 --> 0:20:00.639
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah, So this particular paper they're drawing on various

0:20:00.640 --> 0:20:03.040
<v Speaker 1>surveys and accounts, and they found four populations in West

0:20:03.080 --> 0:20:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Africa where chimps quote habitually bang and throw rocks against

0:20:06.560 --> 0:20:10.520
<v Speaker 1>trees or toss them into tree cavities, resulting in conspicuous

0:20:10.560 --> 0:20:14.760
<v Speaker 1>stone accumulations at these sites. They point out that chimps,

0:20:14.760 --> 0:20:17.920
<v Speaker 1>along with kibuchin monkeys and long tailed macaques, are known

0:20:17.920 --> 0:20:21.160
<v Speaker 1>to use stones as hammers to crack open and cased foods.

0:20:21.880 --> 0:20:24.760
<v Speaker 1>They point out that stone throwing in chimpanzees was first

0:20:24.760 --> 0:20:28.040
<v Speaker 1>described by Jane Goodall, who documented aimed throwing of sticks

0:20:28.080 --> 0:20:32.720
<v Speaker 1>and rocks by male chimpanzees during agonistic displays, and this

0:20:32.840 --> 0:20:35.800
<v Speaker 1>behavior was later described by researchers for other non human

0:20:35.840 --> 0:20:40.400
<v Speaker 1>primates as well, including Japanese macaques, wild baboons, and capuchin monkeys.

0:20:41.200 --> 0:20:43.760
<v Speaker 1>Female bearded kbuchins have also been observed to throw rocks

0:20:43.800 --> 0:20:47.720
<v Speaker 1>during courtship interactions, which I guess this would be like

0:20:47.760 --> 0:20:51.280
<v Speaker 1>tenderly throwing pebbles against a window to get their lover's

0:20:51.359 --> 0:20:56.080
<v Speaker 1>interest at night without awakening the parents downstairs, or maybe not.

0:20:56.600 --> 0:20:59.399
<v Speaker 2>I like it, but human metaphors aside, I mean like it.

0:20:59.680 --> 0:21:02.160
<v Speaker 2>It is interesting that they would throw rocks at each

0:21:02.200 --> 0:21:05.199
<v Speaker 2>other for apparent purposes other than threats or intimidation.

0:21:06.080 --> 0:21:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Again, coming back into the communication aspect of it now,

0:21:10.880 --> 0:21:15.639
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned the using some sort of nutcracking behavior with

0:21:15.760 --> 0:21:18.919
<v Speaker 1>rocks that can sometimes lead to those rocks accumulating in

0:21:18.920 --> 0:21:22.120
<v Speaker 1>certain places, which is a different type of accumulation versus

0:21:22.160 --> 0:21:25.600
<v Speaker 1>what we're talking with the chimps here. Also, the paper

0:21:25.600 --> 0:21:29.000
<v Speaker 1>points out the Japanese macaques engage in stone handling, which

0:21:29.040 --> 0:21:34.040
<v Speaker 1>isn't tool use but solitary object play behavior, and it

0:21:34.080 --> 0:21:37.760
<v Speaker 1>actually results in use where patterns on the stones and

0:21:37.960 --> 0:21:42.120
<v Speaker 1>the stones will then end up accumulating at quote unquote PlayStations.

0:21:43.160 --> 0:21:46.239
<v Speaker 2>So just sort of like handling, manipulating a stone, not

0:21:46.280 --> 0:21:48.160
<v Speaker 2>really doing anything in particular with it.

0:21:48.800 --> 0:21:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, which is I get. You know, it's like

0:21:51.800 --> 0:21:55.960
<v Speaker 1>the monolith hasn't really kicked in yet, but they're but

0:21:55.960 --> 0:22:00.560
<v Speaker 1>they're handling the stone, but chimpanzees are well beyond all

0:22:00.600 --> 0:22:03.879
<v Speaker 1>of these, like chimpanzees are second only to humans in

0:22:03.960 --> 0:22:06.840
<v Speaker 1>the variance of their tool usage. They make use of

0:22:06.880 --> 0:22:11.480
<v Speaker 1>simple sticks, stone hammers, stone cleavers to link to cut foods.

0:22:12.160 --> 0:22:15.919
<v Speaker 1>They've even been observed to hunt sleeping bush babies with

0:22:15.960 --> 0:22:19.280
<v Speaker 1>wooden spears. So this is I think only been observed

0:22:19.280 --> 0:22:24.639
<v Speaker 1>in female chimpanzees. But they'll take take a stick and

0:22:24.720 --> 0:22:27.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of sort of sharpen it with their teeth or

0:22:27.880 --> 0:22:30.959
<v Speaker 1>chew on it, you know, to get something like a point,

0:22:31.080 --> 0:22:33.840
<v Speaker 1>and then use that stick to stab into the hollows

0:22:33.840 --> 0:22:36.560
<v Speaker 1>of trees where there's a sleeping bush baby and spirit

0:22:36.720 --> 0:22:37.960
<v Speaker 1>and pull it back out to eat.

0:22:38.440 --> 0:22:42.240
<v Speaker 2>There's so many surprising little little cases of tool uisu

0:22:42.320 --> 0:22:44.960
<v Speaker 2>pro to tool used to behavior in chimpanzees like this.

0:22:45.920 --> 0:22:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Now, this this paper basically comes down to two hypotheses

0:22:51.720 --> 0:22:55.520
<v Speaker 1>about why the chimps do this. The first, and I

0:22:55.560 --> 0:22:58.359
<v Speaker 1>think the main hypothesis, is that they accumulate stone throwing

0:22:58.400 --> 0:23:04.560
<v Speaker 1>behavior as a modification of male chimpanzee display. This would

0:23:04.560 --> 0:23:05.960
<v Speaker 1>make it mean that it would be kind of like

0:23:06.040 --> 0:23:11.760
<v Speaker 1>an addition to their hand and foot drumming, which is

0:23:11.760 --> 0:23:15.639
<v Speaker 1>a ritualized behavior found in all known chimpanzee populations, and

0:23:15.720 --> 0:23:19.520
<v Speaker 1>the use of the stones, throwing the stones into a pile,

0:23:19.600 --> 0:23:21.680
<v Speaker 1>into the hall of a tree, et cetera, would be

0:23:21.720 --> 0:23:25.080
<v Speaker 1>a way of enhancing this particular activity.

0:23:26.119 --> 0:23:28.919
<v Speaker 2>That's oh yeah, so like hitting a pile of stones

0:23:28.960 --> 0:23:31.520
<v Speaker 2>with a stone would probably make a louder sound than

0:23:31.600 --> 0:23:33.320
<v Speaker 2>just throwing a stone off into the dirt.

0:23:34.119 --> 0:23:37.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I don't think I would not feel comfortable going

0:23:37.920 --> 0:23:41.320
<v Speaker 1>as far to say that they're making music, though I

0:23:41.359 --> 0:23:44.560
<v Speaker 1>think I saw some headlines that were going in that direction.

0:23:46.040 --> 0:23:49.760
<v Speaker 1>They also say that the second area to consider this, say,

0:23:49.960 --> 0:23:52.520
<v Speaker 1>they could also not be male drumming. But if it's

0:23:52.560 --> 0:23:54.720
<v Speaker 1>not that, it would mean that it quote may need

0:23:54.800 --> 0:23:58.600
<v Speaker 1>to be considered in a more symbolic context. And I

0:23:58.600 --> 0:24:00.399
<v Speaker 1>think this is where things would get a little foggy.

0:24:00.400 --> 0:24:03.400
<v Speaker 1>You're a little potentially more nebulous, because you're getting in

0:24:03.440 --> 0:24:07.240
<v Speaker 1>to this area where there is a connection between quote

0:24:07.440 --> 0:24:11.680
<v Speaker 1>ritualized animal behavior and the repeated stereotype behaviors commonly observed

0:24:11.720 --> 0:24:15.600
<v Speaker 1>during human rituals unquote, which granted that could cover a

0:24:15.640 --> 0:24:16.600
<v Speaker 1>great deal of ground.

0:24:17.119 --> 0:24:19.400
<v Speaker 2>This is what I was alluding to earlier. I mean,

0:24:19.400 --> 0:24:21.720
<v Speaker 2>it seems like an interesting possibility, but I think i'd

0:24:21.720 --> 0:24:24.080
<v Speaker 2>need more evidence that that's really the right way to

0:24:24.080 --> 0:24:24.720
<v Speaker 2>think about it.

0:24:25.160 --> 0:24:26.879
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And I think I think that's basically what the

0:24:26.880 --> 0:24:30.040
<v Speaker 1>authors here were leaning towards. Like It's like, if it's

0:24:30.160 --> 0:24:33.119
<v Speaker 1>not just part of the hand and foot drumming of

0:24:33.160 --> 0:24:36.240
<v Speaker 1>the male chimps, then it's something else, and that's something

0:24:36.240 --> 0:24:39.719
<v Speaker 1>else will require more research and more observation.

0:24:40.000 --> 0:24:42.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but a really interesting behavior either way.

0:24:43.280 --> 0:24:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And one thing they'd point out is that it

0:24:45.520 --> 0:24:49.119
<v Speaker 1>could have some great importance not only for our understanding

0:24:49.160 --> 0:24:52.800
<v Speaker 1>of how chimps behave, but also archaeologically when we find

0:24:52.840 --> 0:24:55.840
<v Speaker 1>piles of stones and things that, again we can often

0:24:55.920 --> 0:25:00.280
<v Speaker 1>easily associate with human intention, it could be something else.

0:25:00.320 --> 0:25:03.800
<v Speaker 1>It could be chimps in a or you know, some

0:25:03.840 --> 0:25:07.320
<v Speaker 1>other human ancestor engaging in some sort of display that

0:25:07.440 --> 0:25:09.680
<v Speaker 1>involves accumulating throwing rocks.

0:25:09.760 --> 0:25:12.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Well it forces us to be humble about interpreting

0:25:12.600 --> 0:25:15.800
<v Speaker 2>archaeological evidence, because I think we tend to always want

0:25:15.840 --> 0:25:19.320
<v Speaker 2>to say, oh, if we find a non natural assemblage

0:25:19.320 --> 0:25:21.600
<v Speaker 2>of stones or something like that, you assume it must

0:25:21.600 --> 0:25:25.000
<v Speaker 2>have an almost kind of like industrial purpose. You know,

0:25:25.080 --> 0:25:28.560
<v Speaker 2>it's used for direct survival benefit. Maybe in the manufacture

0:25:28.720 --> 0:25:32.240
<v Speaker 2>of tools or something like that, which which of course

0:25:32.280 --> 0:25:35.120
<v Speaker 2>could be possible. Or the other side is people tend

0:25:35.119 --> 0:25:38.119
<v Speaker 2>to jump to religion you say is ritual use. But

0:25:38.160 --> 0:25:40.240
<v Speaker 2>then there are these cases that we observe in non

0:25:40.320 --> 0:25:42.879
<v Speaker 2>human primates today where it's like, it's not even clear

0:25:42.880 --> 0:25:46.520
<v Speaker 2>what this is for. Yeah, but I wanted to now

0:25:46.600 --> 0:25:52.040
<v Speaker 2>address the topic of the evolution of throwing in humans

0:25:52.640 --> 0:25:55.760
<v Speaker 2>because to the extent that animals throw, and we know

0:25:55.880 --> 0:25:58.720
<v Speaker 2>from everything we've looked at in these episodes that many,

0:25:58.880 --> 0:26:02.359
<v Speaker 2>many non human animals do throw, they don't throw like

0:26:02.520 --> 0:26:07.280
<v Speaker 2>we do. No animal out there comes anywhere close to

0:26:07.359 --> 0:26:12.480
<v Speaker 2>the combined levels of force and target precision that humans

0:26:12.520 --> 0:26:15.960
<v Speaker 2>are capable of. And to further explore this, I was

0:26:16.000 --> 0:26:19.879
<v Speaker 2>looking at an interesting paper by Michael P. Lombardo and

0:26:20.080 --> 0:26:23.760
<v Speaker 2>robert O. Diener published in the Quarterly Review of Biology

0:26:23.800 --> 0:26:28.040
<v Speaker 2>in twenty eighteen called Born to Throw The Ecological Causes

0:26:28.040 --> 0:26:31.600
<v Speaker 2>that shaped the Evolution of Throwing in Humans. Now, I'm

0:26:31.600 --> 0:26:33.879
<v Speaker 2>not going to address all the subtopics in this paper,

0:26:33.880 --> 0:26:36.080
<v Speaker 2>but wanted to pull out some highlights that I found

0:26:36.119 --> 0:26:40.280
<v Speaker 2>really interesting. So the authors begin by identifying two major

0:26:40.359 --> 0:26:44.200
<v Speaker 2>turning points in the relationship between human anatomy and human

0:26:44.240 --> 0:26:47.520
<v Speaker 2>behavior that sort of drove the evolution of the modern

0:26:47.600 --> 0:26:51.160
<v Speaker 2>human body. And they identified the shift to bipedal locomotion

0:26:51.720 --> 0:26:54.919
<v Speaker 2>that of course is well known, but also the development

0:26:55.000 --> 0:26:58.640
<v Speaker 2>of forceful overhand throwing, and they argue that the former

0:26:59.080 --> 0:27:01.280
<v Speaker 2>has gotten a lot more at tension than the latter,

0:27:01.359 --> 0:27:04.240
<v Speaker 2>but the latter might be considered equally important, if not

0:27:04.359 --> 0:27:09.439
<v Speaker 2>more so. There are other animals that throw in various scenarios,

0:27:09.480 --> 0:27:12.840
<v Speaker 2>as we've documented, but humans are the only primates that

0:27:12.920 --> 0:27:17.080
<v Speaker 2>can be observed to regularly throw targeted projectiles in order

0:27:17.119 --> 0:27:21.560
<v Speaker 2>to kill or cause injury to another animal. And I

0:27:21.560 --> 0:27:24.640
<v Speaker 2>think also it's worth noticing not only how much better

0:27:24.680 --> 0:27:27.840
<v Speaker 2>we are throwing than other animals, but how this is

0:27:27.880 --> 0:27:31.120
<v Speaker 2>pretty much the only feat of physical strength. They're one

0:27:31.119 --> 0:27:34.399
<v Speaker 2>of the only feats of physical strength where we surpass

0:27:34.560 --> 0:27:38.600
<v Speaker 2>our closest primate relatives. So compared to other primates like

0:27:38.680 --> 0:27:43.160
<v Speaker 2>chimpanzees and gorillas, humans are incredibly weak. The authors cite

0:27:43.200 --> 0:27:46.560
<v Speaker 2>some research it's older research from nineteen twenty six, attempting

0:27:47.080 --> 0:27:49.879
<v Speaker 2>to quantify the difference between the you know, like the

0:27:50.000 --> 0:27:54.240
<v Speaker 2>arm strength of a chimpanzee versus an adult human and this.

0:27:54.240 --> 0:27:57.600
<v Speaker 2>This older study concludes that, controlling for body size, an

0:27:57.640 --> 0:28:02.000
<v Speaker 2>adult male chimpanzee is on average roughly four times stronger

0:28:02.000 --> 0:28:05.439
<v Speaker 2>than a fit adult human male. Now this is probably

0:28:05.480 --> 0:28:08.320
<v Speaker 2>a very approximate guess, but I think it is utterly

0:28:08.400 --> 0:28:12.960
<v Speaker 2>uncontroversial to say that chimps are way way stronger than humans.

0:28:13.000 --> 0:28:15.440
<v Speaker 2>A chimpanzee could probably just rip your head off.

0:28:16.119 --> 0:28:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, and I've seen some images of I've had.

0:28:20.119 --> 0:28:22.840
<v Speaker 1>I can't recall if it was a hairless gorilla or

0:28:22.880 --> 0:28:26.520
<v Speaker 1>a hairless chimpanzee, but it allows you to really see

0:28:26.520 --> 0:28:30.840
<v Speaker 1>the muscle definition, and it was terrifying how ripped this

0:28:30.920 --> 0:28:31.520
<v Speaker 1>creature was.

0:28:32.400 --> 0:28:37.040
<v Speaker 2>However, despite being several times stronger than a human on average,

0:28:37.359 --> 0:28:40.360
<v Speaker 2>in a general sense, their muscles are just stronger. A

0:28:40.480 --> 0:28:45.320
<v Speaker 2>chimpanzee is several times weaker than even an adolescent human

0:28:45.680 --> 0:28:49.440
<v Speaker 2>when it comes to forceful overhand throwing. And I was

0:28:49.480 --> 0:28:53.080
<v Speaker 2>looking to try to find this comparison quantified. I did

0:28:53.160 --> 0:28:56.040
<v Speaker 2>find it in the work of a Harvard researcher named

0:28:56.120 --> 0:28:59.560
<v Speaker 2>Neil Thomas Roach, who studies the evolution of high speed throwing.

0:29:00.280 --> 0:29:01.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to come back to some research he was

0:29:01.960 --> 0:29:05.480
<v Speaker 2>involved in a minute, but just quickly here, Roach cites

0:29:05.520 --> 0:29:09.360
<v Speaker 2>figures that even an adult male chimpanzee who has specifically

0:29:09.400 --> 0:29:11.479
<v Speaker 2>been trained to throw a ball, So this is not

0:29:11.600 --> 0:29:14.440
<v Speaker 2>just a naive chimpanzee who's never done this before. This

0:29:14.560 --> 0:29:18.320
<v Speaker 2>is one who has humans have trained them to throw

0:29:18.480 --> 0:29:21.280
<v Speaker 2>as hard as they can. One who has been trained

0:29:21.360 --> 0:29:24.520
<v Speaker 2>can only achieve top throwing speeds of about twenty miles

0:29:24.560 --> 0:29:28.520
<v Speaker 2>per hour, whereas among humans, twelve to thirteen year old

0:29:28.560 --> 0:29:33.680
<v Speaker 2>recreational baseball pictures can achieve pitches above sixty miles per hour,

0:29:34.200 --> 0:29:38.240
<v Speaker 2>and professional adult baseball players can throw fastballs in the

0:29:38.400 --> 0:29:41.600
<v Speaker 2>like ninety to one hundred mile per hour range. So

0:29:41.840 --> 0:29:47.200
<v Speaker 2>isn't that bizarre. A chimpanzee might be simultaneously three or

0:29:47.280 --> 0:29:50.880
<v Speaker 2>four times stronger than you in general, but you are

0:29:50.920 --> 0:29:54.760
<v Speaker 2>probably right now at least three times stronger than the

0:29:54.840 --> 0:29:56.440
<v Speaker 2>chimp when it comes to throwing.

0:29:57.400 --> 0:30:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Wow, that's a massive blow too. Any chimpanzee playing baseball

0:30:02.240 --> 0:30:05.880
<v Speaker 1>movies out there or basketball movies like it doesn't make

0:30:05.960 --> 0:30:06.880
<v Speaker 1>sense exactly.

0:30:06.920 --> 0:30:09.479
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so like Chimp Rookie of the Year, that movie

0:30:09.560 --> 0:30:13.680
<v Speaker 2>that's based on a false premise. Yeah, but I think

0:30:13.720 --> 0:30:15.760
<v Speaker 2>this makes more sense the more you think about the

0:30:15.840 --> 0:30:19.040
<v Speaker 2>act of throwing in granular detail. So throwing comes so

0:30:19.280 --> 0:30:23.280
<v Speaker 2>naturally and so easily to us as a species, it

0:30:23.360 --> 0:30:27.840
<v Speaker 2>takes real, deliberate effort to understand what an extremely difficult

0:30:27.880 --> 0:30:33.760
<v Speaker 2>and complex behavior, forceful targeted throwing is. It requires split

0:30:33.880 --> 0:30:38.840
<v Speaker 2>second mental calculations regarding force, angle, and timing, as well

0:30:38.880 --> 0:30:43.200
<v Speaker 2>as coordination of lots of precise and rapid movements by

0:30:43.280 --> 0:30:46.239
<v Speaker 2>many different parts of the body. So think about all

0:30:46.280 --> 0:30:48.920
<v Speaker 2>this stuff. Think about everything your muscles and your brain

0:30:49.160 --> 0:30:52.240
<v Speaker 2>have to do together to throw a rock and hit something,

0:30:52.320 --> 0:30:55.200
<v Speaker 2>especially if the thing is moving. You have to track

0:30:55.280 --> 0:30:59.600
<v Speaker 2>the target, anticipate future motion of the target, take into

0:30:59.640 --> 0:31:03.480
<v Speaker 2>account the physical features of the projectile, for example, like

0:31:03.560 --> 0:31:06.200
<v Speaker 2>its weight and its shape and so forth, which will

0:31:06.240 --> 0:31:09.160
<v Speaker 2>affect how it travels. You have to understand the object

0:31:09.160 --> 0:31:14.240
<v Speaker 2>you're throwing to throw it effectively. You have to understand

0:31:14.280 --> 0:31:16.960
<v Speaker 2>how exactly to draw back and extend the arm for

0:31:17.040 --> 0:31:20.280
<v Speaker 2>the throw, how to grip the object in preparation for

0:31:20.320 --> 0:31:24.120
<v Speaker 2>the throw, exactly how and when to release the projectile

0:31:24.160 --> 0:31:26.840
<v Speaker 2>from the grip. And that's like a you know, tiny,

0:31:26.920 --> 0:31:29.520
<v Speaker 2>tiny window, and you have to time all of those

0:31:29.600 --> 0:31:33.200
<v Speaker 2>muscular movements in exactly the right sequence, which might all

0:31:33.240 --> 0:31:37.560
<v Speaker 2>take place in less than a second. Throwing behaviors are

0:31:37.600 --> 0:31:41.840
<v Speaker 2>one of the fastest motions produced by the musculoskeletal system

0:31:41.920 --> 0:31:42.760
<v Speaker 2>of the human body.

0:31:43.560 --> 0:31:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, which makes it all the more depressing when you

0:31:46.040 --> 0:31:48.600
<v Speaker 1>throw a cat toy and the cat doesn't chase after

0:31:48.680 --> 0:31:50.280
<v Speaker 1>it and doesn't take the crass, like did you not

0:31:50.360 --> 0:31:52.960
<v Speaker 1>see what I just did? But in the case of

0:31:52.960 --> 0:31:55.120
<v Speaker 1>throwing a cat toy, you know, I'm not trying to

0:31:55.160 --> 0:31:58.840
<v Speaker 1>actually make the toy go anywhere specific. But if I'm

0:31:58.920 --> 0:32:01.200
<v Speaker 1>say bowling, which I guess I don't know if you

0:32:01.200 --> 0:32:02.560
<v Speaker 1>would call bowling throwing, I.

0:32:02.560 --> 0:32:04.719
<v Speaker 2>Guess it's sort of like I think it counts.

0:32:05.240 --> 0:32:07.880
<v Speaker 1>But when I'm doing that, that's one of those rare

0:32:07.880 --> 0:32:11.760
<v Speaker 1>instances is where I'll occasionally stop and think and try

0:32:11.800 --> 0:32:14.480
<v Speaker 1>and sort of focus on what all I'm doing to

0:32:15.440 --> 0:32:17.960
<v Speaker 1>carry out this physical act. And yet it's, like you said,

0:32:17.960 --> 0:32:20.160
<v Speaker 1>there's so many things going on that we don't even

0:32:20.200 --> 0:32:24.800
<v Speaker 1>really have conscious control of, or not privy to, or

0:32:24.840 --> 0:32:26.480
<v Speaker 1>and if we think too much about it, we're just

0:32:26.520 --> 0:32:29.240
<v Speaker 1>going to drop it on our toe. Anyway. It's really

0:32:29.320 --> 0:32:29.960
<v Speaker 1>quite amazing.

0:32:30.480 --> 0:32:34.280
<v Speaker 2>That's another interesting aspect of throwing that I think a

0:32:34.280 --> 0:32:37.600
<v Speaker 2>lot of people can attest. From their own experience. When

0:32:37.640 --> 0:32:39.880
<v Speaker 2>you think too much about throwing, you tend to get

0:32:39.880 --> 0:32:43.000
<v Speaker 2>worse at it. Isn't that strange like this, You tend

0:32:43.000 --> 0:32:45.800
<v Speaker 2>to throw more accurately when you kind of turn off

0:32:45.840 --> 0:32:48.960
<v Speaker 2>your analytical brain and just let your intuitions take over.

0:32:59.200 --> 0:33:02.400
<v Speaker 2>So anyway, that we are so much better adapted for

0:33:02.520 --> 0:33:07.160
<v Speaker 2>targeted overhand throwing than other primates, even our most closely

0:33:07.200 --> 0:33:13.320
<v Speaker 2>related primates like chimpanzees, suggests specific selection pressure on our ancestors,

0:33:13.360 --> 0:33:17.480
<v Speaker 2>favoring the development of skeleton, muscular, as well as neurological

0:33:17.520 --> 0:33:20.880
<v Speaker 2>adaptations that allow us to excel at throwing to the

0:33:20.920 --> 0:33:24.840
<v Speaker 2>extent that we do. We seem quite clearly biologically shaped

0:33:24.840 --> 0:33:28.520
<v Speaker 2>for throwing, and that requires changes in multiple parts of

0:33:28.560 --> 0:33:32.200
<v Speaker 2>the body, the muscles and the skeleton of like the

0:33:32.360 --> 0:33:34.479
<v Speaker 2>arm and the shoulder and the torso, but also the

0:33:34.560 --> 0:33:38.560
<v Speaker 2>brain and the nervous system. Now, lest you think, I

0:33:38.600 --> 0:33:42.200
<v Speaker 2>don't know how useful in real world struggle could throwing be.

0:33:43.160 --> 0:33:46.160
<v Speaker 2>I think this is uncontroversial. But the authors do spend

0:33:46.160 --> 0:33:50.920
<v Speaker 2>a fair amount of time just providing evidence that they do.

0:33:51.000 --> 0:33:54.280
<v Speaker 2>Observations of pre modern practices in hunting and warfare to

0:33:54.480 --> 0:33:58.720
<v Speaker 2>show the prevalence and utility of targeted overhand throwing. They're like, yes,

0:33:58.760 --> 0:34:02.640
<v Speaker 2>it's incredibly useful. They say that human quote, hunters and

0:34:02.640 --> 0:34:08.400
<v Speaker 2>warriors used human muscle power to propel bolas, boomerangs, darts, knives, sticks, stones,

0:34:08.440 --> 0:34:11.920
<v Speaker 2>and spears thrown with or without the aid of oddo lattles.

0:34:12.400 --> 0:34:14.279
<v Speaker 2>If you're interested in the oddo loattle. By the way,

0:34:14.280 --> 0:34:16.439
<v Speaker 2>we did an episode of invention on that a long

0:34:16.440 --> 0:34:18.640
<v Speaker 2>time ago that I think was one of my favorites.

0:34:18.680 --> 0:34:21.840
<v Speaker 2>I remember that being really interesting. Anyway, many of the

0:34:21.880 --> 0:34:25.279
<v Speaker 2>technologies that replaced these practices in hunting and warfare have

0:34:25.320 --> 0:34:30.120
<v Speaker 2>simply replaced the muscular power with mechanical or chemical sources

0:34:30.160 --> 0:34:32.480
<v Speaker 2>of energy to power the throw, and that can be

0:34:32.520 --> 0:34:35.120
<v Speaker 2>everything from the tension of a bow string to the

0:34:35.160 --> 0:34:40.520
<v Speaker 2>combustion of gunpowder in a firearm. So the question is

0:34:40.680 --> 0:34:45.280
<v Speaker 2>how did our hominin ancestors make the leap from something

0:34:45.320 --> 0:34:49.960
<v Speaker 2>like the occasional low specialization, low utility tossing behaviors we

0:34:50.000 --> 0:34:53.600
<v Speaker 2>see in our closest primate relatives like chimpanzees, to the

0:34:53.719 --> 0:34:59.080
<v Speaker 2>kind of habitual, powerful, targeted overhand throwing that is characteristic

0:34:59.120 --> 0:35:03.960
<v Speaker 2>of humans today. Now, like many questions in evolutionary anthropology.

0:35:04.200 --> 0:35:05.960
<v Speaker 2>We don't know the answer to this one for sure.

0:35:06.040 --> 0:35:08.720
<v Speaker 2>This is not one where somebody can tell you the answer,

0:35:09.080 --> 0:35:11.799
<v Speaker 2>but there are a few hypotheses that are informed by

0:35:11.800 --> 0:35:14.799
<v Speaker 2>some interesting evidence that we can take a look at. Now,

0:35:14.840 --> 0:35:17.600
<v Speaker 2>before we can figure out how that advance from sort

0:35:17.600 --> 0:35:21.440
<v Speaker 2>of occasional, low utility throwing to human style throwing might

0:35:21.480 --> 0:35:25.600
<v Speaker 2>have occurred, it's worth discussing the major hypothesized uses of

0:35:25.640 --> 0:35:30.600
<v Speaker 2>overhand throwing in an ancestral hominine environment. Hunting is a

0:35:30.680 --> 0:35:33.520
<v Speaker 2>very obvious one, right, Being able to throw a rock

0:35:33.640 --> 0:35:35.640
<v Speaker 2>or a stick with force and hit a prey animal

0:35:35.680 --> 0:35:39.759
<v Speaker 2>would be extremely useful, But the authors also call out

0:35:40.120 --> 0:35:44.160
<v Speaker 2>intra specific and agonistic encounters, which means conflict with other

0:35:44.239 --> 0:35:47.239
<v Speaker 2>members of the same species. And then, finally, I thought

0:35:47.280 --> 0:35:50.600
<v Speaker 2>this one was really fascinating, and this one may help

0:35:50.640 --> 0:35:53.920
<v Speaker 2>explain and help you see how this bridge could have

0:35:53.960 --> 0:35:59.880
<v Speaker 2>been crossed behaviorally, the practice of power scavenging, which means

0:36:00.360 --> 0:36:03.439
<v Speaker 2>not just regular scavenging, not just wandering around looking for

0:36:03.520 --> 0:36:08.120
<v Speaker 2>a dead animal to feast upon. Power scavenging means waiting

0:36:08.239 --> 0:36:11.600
<v Speaker 2>for other predators to take down a prey animal and

0:36:11.640 --> 0:36:15.120
<v Speaker 2>then chasing those predators away. From the kill and taking

0:36:15.160 --> 0:36:16.040
<v Speaker 2>it for yourself.

0:36:16.760 --> 0:36:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. There was a fabulous BBC documentary several years back

0:36:21.560 --> 0:36:25.640
<v Speaker 1>titled Human Planet that was narrated by John Hurt, and

0:36:26.280 --> 0:36:29.600
<v Speaker 1>it had to do with various human practices of often

0:36:29.680 --> 0:36:34.200
<v Speaker 1>hunting or scavenging that have been practiced to some degree

0:36:34.480 --> 0:36:37.759
<v Speaker 1>into the modern age, and one of them involved stealing

0:36:38.520 --> 0:36:42.040
<v Speaker 1>part of the kill from a lion, which would be

0:36:42.040 --> 0:36:44.960
<v Speaker 1>an example of power scavenging something where you want to

0:36:44.960 --> 0:36:46.920
<v Speaker 1>get in there like that the lion has done the

0:36:47.040 --> 0:36:50.640
<v Speaker 1>I guess the hard part and has brought down prey,

0:36:50.960 --> 0:36:53.359
<v Speaker 1>but now you're going to do an also hard thing.

0:36:53.760 --> 0:36:57.080
<v Speaker 1>You want to get in there, drive the predator away

0:36:57.160 --> 0:36:59.279
<v Speaker 1>long enough to get yourself a little bit of the

0:36:59.320 --> 0:36:59.919
<v Speaker 1>meat as well.

0:37:00.200 --> 0:37:04.160
<v Speaker 2>Right. So, for this hypothesis, the authors cite a work

0:37:04.200 --> 0:37:06.920
<v Speaker 2>by Bingham and Susa from two thousand and nine which

0:37:06.920 --> 0:37:09.560
<v Speaker 2>makes the case that during the time of transition from

0:37:09.760 --> 0:37:13.359
<v Speaker 2>Australiopithesenes to the emergence of the Homo genus to which

0:37:13.360 --> 0:37:17.240
<v Speaker 2>we belong, climate conditions in Africa may have given rise

0:37:17.320 --> 0:37:23.399
<v Speaker 2>to these little, isolated savannah environments containing hominins, but these

0:37:23.480 --> 0:37:27.880
<v Speaker 2>environments also quote lacked dangerous predators and power scavengers like

0:37:27.960 --> 0:37:32.200
<v Speaker 2>lions and hyenas, but contained smaller and less dangerous predators

0:37:32.200 --> 0:37:37.279
<v Speaker 2>such as leopards and cheetahs. So if that's correct, it's

0:37:37.480 --> 0:37:40.560
<v Speaker 2>it's maybe easy to imagine how with leopards and cheetahs

0:37:41.040 --> 0:37:44.920
<v Speaker 2>you could more more plausibly chase them away, or early

0:37:44.920 --> 0:37:47.879
<v Speaker 2>hominins could have chased them away from a kill by

0:37:47.960 --> 0:37:51.399
<v Speaker 2>throwing things at them, even without very specialized weapons, maybe

0:37:51.440 --> 0:37:55.719
<v Speaker 2>just by like throwing rocks or unmodified sticks. And this

0:37:55.760 --> 0:37:57.600
<v Speaker 2>could be thought of as a kind of high risk,

0:37:57.680 --> 0:38:02.040
<v Speaker 2>high reward strategy. Like with power scavenging. You can get

0:38:02.040 --> 0:38:06.120
<v Speaker 2>a big meat payday with relatively little energy investment since

0:38:06.160 --> 0:38:09.240
<v Speaker 2>you don't have to chase the prey animal down yourself.

0:38:09.800 --> 0:38:12.600
<v Speaker 2>But it's dangerous. You do have to confront one or

0:38:12.600 --> 0:38:15.680
<v Speaker 2>more predators for the kill, and this type of strategy

0:38:15.840 --> 0:38:18.239
<v Speaker 2>might not be worth the risk if you have to

0:38:18.280 --> 0:38:21.200
<v Speaker 2>fight a leopard with your hands or with handheld weapons.

0:38:21.600 --> 0:38:23.759
<v Speaker 2>But if you can just throw rocks at it from

0:38:23.800 --> 0:38:26.000
<v Speaker 2>a distance until it runs away, that could be a

0:38:26.000 --> 0:38:26.680
<v Speaker 2>really good deal.

0:38:27.719 --> 0:38:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and again not necessarily drive it off completely, but

0:38:31.800 --> 0:38:35.040
<v Speaker 1>just create an opening during which you can carry out

0:38:35.040 --> 0:38:36.879
<v Speaker 1>some power scavenging and then get out of there.

0:38:37.160 --> 0:38:40.319
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Now another question to look at is what is

0:38:40.360 --> 0:38:43.640
<v Speaker 2>the earliest we have, like totally clear physical evidence to

0:38:43.719 --> 0:38:48.000
<v Speaker 2>establish the use of thrown projectiles by humans. The author's

0:38:48.040 --> 0:38:51.480
<v Speaker 2>write quote unambiguous archaeological evidence of the use of modified

0:38:51.520 --> 0:38:55.319
<v Speaker 2>throwing weapons manufactured by members of the genus Homo. Are

0:38:55.360 --> 0:38:59.080
<v Speaker 2>these stone spear points manufactured approximately three hundred thousand years

0:38:59.120 --> 0:39:02.600
<v Speaker 2>ago in Africa. Hunting spears with their center of gravity

0:39:02.640 --> 0:39:05.000
<v Speaker 2>one third of the way from the tip, suggesting that

0:39:05.040 --> 0:39:07.960
<v Speaker 2>they were thrown were found in Germany and date from

0:39:08.000 --> 0:39:11.040
<v Speaker 2>three hundred thousand to four hundred thousand years ago. These

0:39:11.040 --> 0:39:14.719
<v Speaker 2>two examples are evidence that manufactured weapons were thrown by

0:39:15.160 --> 0:39:18.120
<v Speaker 2>members of the Homo genus at least three hundred thousand

0:39:18.200 --> 0:39:21.439
<v Speaker 2>years ago. But while it's harder to be certain about

0:39:21.480 --> 0:39:24.080
<v Speaker 2>what happened before that, the authors infer that human ancestors

0:39:24.120 --> 0:39:26.959
<v Speaker 2>were probably throwing sticks and rocks going back a couple

0:39:27.080 --> 0:39:30.520
<v Speaker 2>million years, so there was probably use of throwing of

0:39:31.280 --> 0:39:35.200
<v Speaker 2>less modified or unmodified objects from the environment before. We

0:39:35.280 --> 0:39:38.120
<v Speaker 2>have evidence of these modified throwing weapons from like three

0:39:38.200 --> 0:39:41.480
<v Speaker 2>hundred to four hundred thousand years ago, And one idea

0:39:41.600 --> 0:39:44.359
<v Speaker 2>I came across in trying to locate the origins of

0:39:44.440 --> 0:39:48.799
<v Speaker 2>habitual forceful throwing is based on studies of anatomy, and

0:39:48.960 --> 0:39:51.200
<v Speaker 2>this brings us back to that researcher I talked about

0:39:51.200 --> 0:39:55.720
<v Speaker 2>a minute ago, the anthropologist Neil Thomas Roach, who along

0:39:55.760 --> 0:39:59.680
<v Speaker 2>with some colleagues studied the bodies and behavior of practiced

0:39:59.760 --> 0:40:05.120
<v Speaker 2>human throwers like baseball pitchers. And let's see the citation

0:40:05.280 --> 0:40:11.480
<v Speaker 2>here is Roach vinca deson Rainbow and Lieberman from twenty

0:40:11.520 --> 0:40:15.560
<v Speaker 2>thirteen published in the journal Nature, and the paper title

0:40:15.640 --> 0:40:18.880
<v Speaker 2>is Elastic Energy Storage in the Shoulder and the Evolution

0:40:18.960 --> 0:40:22.880
<v Speaker 2>of high speed Throwing in Homo And basically, these authors

0:40:23.280 --> 0:40:27.040
<v Speaker 2>contend that the anatomical difference that makes human so good

0:40:27.040 --> 0:40:31.160
<v Speaker 2>at throwing is our ability to store elastic energy in

0:40:31.239 --> 0:40:33.680
<v Speaker 2>our shoulders. So it's not just like the strength of

0:40:33.760 --> 0:40:36.640
<v Speaker 2>the muscles, but the fact that the human body is

0:40:36.719 --> 0:40:40.319
<v Speaker 2>designed to sort of cock back the arm before a

0:40:40.360 --> 0:40:45.520
<v Speaker 2>forceful throw, and a human essentially creates a biomechanical sling

0:40:45.600 --> 0:40:49.440
<v Speaker 2>shot by stretching the tendons and the ligaments surrounding the

0:40:49.480 --> 0:40:52.520
<v Speaker 2>scapula or the shoulder blade, and this tension could be

0:40:52.600 --> 0:40:55.320
<v Speaker 2>thought of as analogous to the tension in a bowstring.

0:40:55.320 --> 0:40:58.759
<v Speaker 2>It allows very rapid extension of the arm after the

0:40:58.840 --> 0:41:02.200
<v Speaker 2>wind up. Now how come we can do this and

0:41:02.239 --> 0:41:06.399
<v Speaker 2>our nearest relatives like chimpanzees cannot. The researchers here argued

0:41:06.440 --> 0:41:09.960
<v Speaker 2>that there are basically three important anatomical changes that are

0:41:10.000 --> 0:41:15.719
<v Speaker 2>found altogether around two million years ago in the species

0:41:15.760 --> 0:41:20.560
<v Speaker 2>Homo erectus. So these three changes are the expansion of

0:41:20.640 --> 0:41:24.200
<v Speaker 2>the waist and this sort of lets the torso rotate

0:41:24.280 --> 0:41:27.799
<v Speaker 2>above the hips, which generates more rotational force. So when

0:41:27.840 --> 0:41:30.680
<v Speaker 2>you're like cocking your arm back to throw overhand, you

0:41:30.760 --> 0:41:34.800
<v Speaker 2>typically you twist your torso, and that change in Homo

0:41:34.880 --> 0:41:38.000
<v Speaker 2>erectus allowed them to twist their torso like that. The

0:41:38.040 --> 0:41:41.760
<v Speaker 2>second is a lower positioning of the shoulders on the torso,

0:41:42.520 --> 0:41:46.160
<v Speaker 2>and this changes the orientation of the muscles around the shoulder,

0:41:46.200 --> 0:41:48.960
<v Speaker 2>again helping us to store more energy in the wind

0:41:49.040 --> 0:41:52.480
<v Speaker 2>up of an overhand throw. Again, this is found in homoerectus.

0:41:52.560 --> 0:41:56.759
<v Speaker 2>And then the twisting of the humorous bone, which is

0:41:56.840 --> 0:42:00.000
<v Speaker 2>the upper arm bone, and that twisting is yet another

0:42:00.200 --> 0:42:02.879
<v Speaker 2>way to stretch the bow strings, storing up even more

0:42:03.000 --> 0:42:06.719
<v Speaker 2>energy in the wind up. And you can see these differences,

0:42:07.200 --> 0:42:09.480
<v Speaker 2>there's a diagram. They include you might be able to

0:42:09.480 --> 0:42:12.799
<v Speaker 2>look up for yourself if you see a comparison of

0:42:13.160 --> 0:42:16.040
<v Speaker 2>like a muscle diagram or the scapula of a chimpanzee

0:42:16.040 --> 0:42:18.680
<v Speaker 2>and a human, and you can see some of these differences,

0:42:18.920 --> 0:42:23.240
<v Speaker 2>particularly the lower position of the shoulder on the human body.

0:42:23.320 --> 0:42:26.080
<v Speaker 2>You know, you look at the upper musculature of a

0:42:26.160 --> 0:42:28.399
<v Speaker 2>chimpanzee and you're like, well, I really would not want

0:42:28.440 --> 0:42:31.640
<v Speaker 2>to be clubbed by this animal, And I imagine that

0:42:31.680 --> 0:42:34.879
<v Speaker 2>animal can really like climb a tree really well. But

0:42:35.000 --> 0:42:38.080
<v Speaker 2>there's there's some kind of different twisting of the shoulder

0:42:38.160 --> 0:42:41.320
<v Speaker 2>and the pectoral muscle in the human body that apparently

0:42:41.360 --> 0:42:45.200
<v Speaker 2>allows us to perform this cockingback or wind up behavior

0:42:45.239 --> 0:42:47.960
<v Speaker 2>before an overhand throw so much better than a chimp can.

0:42:48.800 --> 0:42:51.800
<v Speaker 1>This also means, according to the cillustration, the chimpanzee nipple

0:42:51.880 --> 0:42:56.160
<v Speaker 1>is also just a little bit higher, It's true, portly comparatively.

0:42:57.160 --> 0:43:00.759
<v Speaker 2>So. Roach and colleagues argue that these anatomical changes that

0:43:00.880 --> 0:43:06.000
<v Speaker 2>favor throwing coincide with archaeological evidence showing increased hunting activity

0:43:06.280 --> 0:43:09.520
<v Speaker 2>in these hominins, so like more processed animal bones at

0:43:09.520 --> 0:43:13.680
<v Speaker 2>occupied sites, stone tool work, and so forth. So that

0:43:13.719 --> 0:43:17.920
<v Speaker 2>would make a link between these anatomical changes that favor

0:43:17.960 --> 0:43:21.200
<v Speaker 2>the ability to throw, and what human ancestors were eating.

0:43:21.239 --> 0:43:25.760
<v Speaker 2>The homoerectus was apparently dining on more meat. Now, coming

0:43:25.760 --> 0:43:29.240
<v Speaker 2>back to that paper by Lombardo and Deaner from twenty eighteen,

0:43:29.440 --> 0:43:32.040
<v Speaker 2>they examine a number of other different things, like talking

0:43:32.040 --> 0:43:35.960
<v Speaker 2>about the prevalence and effectiveness of overhand throwing in warfare

0:43:36.000 --> 0:43:38.080
<v Speaker 2>and hunting, and they also look at things like sex

0:43:38.160 --> 0:43:42.279
<v Speaker 2>differences in throwing behavior. For example, in chimpanzees, there's some

0:43:42.320 --> 0:43:46.480
<v Speaker 2>evidence that male chimpanzees tend to throw more and relative

0:43:46.520 --> 0:43:49.680
<v Speaker 2>levels of lethality and targeted throwing behaviors and so forth.

0:43:49.719 --> 0:43:53.319
<v Speaker 2>But to come to the conclusion regarding that transition, like

0:43:53.400 --> 0:43:56.879
<v Speaker 2>how did the leap happen from you know, sort of occasional,

0:43:57.160 --> 0:44:00.719
<v Speaker 2>non specialized throwing like we see in chimpanzees today to

0:44:01.040 --> 0:44:04.840
<v Speaker 2>the habitual, targeted, forceful overhand throwing that humans can do.

0:44:05.800 --> 0:44:09.799
<v Speaker 2>The conclusion, they argue, is that this adaptation grew out

0:44:09.840 --> 0:44:12.760
<v Speaker 2>of quote a way for throwers to manipulate the behavior

0:44:12.800 --> 0:44:18.640
<v Speaker 2>of targeted individuals during intraspecific agonistic interactions and then later

0:44:18.760 --> 0:44:23.319
<v Speaker 2>transitioned into use during power scavenging and hunting by hominins,

0:44:23.600 --> 0:44:27.759
<v Speaker 2>perhaps in the australiopithesceenes. So why do they think it

0:44:27.960 --> 0:44:33.920
<v Speaker 2>started with manipulating the behavior of other hominins within the

0:44:33.960 --> 0:44:38.239
<v Speaker 2>same species and agonistic interactions. Well, I think we can

0:44:38.320 --> 0:44:41.879
<v Speaker 2>get some clues by looking at our closest primate relatives. Again,

0:44:42.280 --> 0:44:44.960
<v Speaker 2>this in no way clinches the argument. We don't know

0:44:45.000 --> 0:44:47.480
<v Speaker 2>for sure, but it's an interesting line of evidence. So

0:44:47.480 --> 0:44:51.279
<v Speaker 2>they say, if you look at our relatives like chimpanzees, bonobos,

0:44:51.400 --> 0:44:55.160
<v Speaker 2>gorillas and so forth, these animals have all been observed throwing.

0:44:55.360 --> 0:44:59.080
<v Speaker 2>But when and how do they throw? Well, do they

0:44:59.120 --> 0:45:02.799
<v Speaker 2>throw to hunt? The answer there seems like either no

0:45:03.280 --> 0:45:07.560
<v Speaker 2>or almost never. There are almost no claimed observations that

0:45:07.680 --> 0:45:11.120
<v Speaker 2>any of these animals use projectiles for hunting, with basically

0:45:11.160 --> 0:45:14.320
<v Speaker 2>one possible exception, and that's a report by Jane Goodall

0:45:14.400 --> 0:45:18.239
<v Speaker 2>actually in nineteen eighty six, where to read from the

0:45:18.239 --> 0:45:21.920
<v Speaker 2>paper here quote Goodall reported three observations of throwing by

0:45:21.960 --> 0:45:26.320
<v Speaker 2>hunting chimpanzees. In two instances, stones thrown by an adult

0:45:26.360 --> 0:45:29.200
<v Speaker 2>male may have been intended to cause the prey adult

0:45:29.239 --> 0:45:32.560
<v Speaker 2>bush pigs to run rather than to harm them. In

0:45:32.600 --> 0:45:37.319
<v Speaker 2>another instance, six male chimpanzees hunting baboons threw stones at

0:45:37.320 --> 0:45:40.680
<v Speaker 2>male baboons that were attacking the hunters. None of these

0:45:40.680 --> 0:45:44.359
<v Speaker 2>accounts closely resembles the highly skilled aimed throwing used by

0:45:44.400 --> 0:45:49.080
<v Speaker 2>human hunters, so even if these instances count, they appear

0:45:49.200 --> 0:45:52.840
<v Speaker 2>to be somewhat ambiguous and relatively unique. There are basically

0:45:52.880 --> 0:45:57.920
<v Speaker 2>no other reports of apes throwing to hunt, and instead

0:45:58.000 --> 0:46:00.480
<v Speaker 2>apes and monkeys seem to use throwing as part of

0:46:00.520 --> 0:46:04.479
<v Speaker 2>communication behavior during encounters with other members of the same

0:46:04.520 --> 0:46:09.400
<v Speaker 2>species or sometimes with other animals such as humans. Most

0:46:09.520 --> 0:46:13.200
<v Speaker 2>often it's used for agonistic interactions, a kind of threat

0:46:13.239 --> 0:46:16.840
<v Speaker 2>display that you might throw rocks or sticks at another

0:46:17.080 --> 0:46:19.799
<v Speaker 2>member of the same ape species or another animal to

0:46:19.880 --> 0:46:22.839
<v Speaker 2>sort of drive them away or intimidate them. So if

0:46:22.880 --> 0:46:26.600
<v Speaker 2>a chimpanzee is trying to display dominance or intimidate another one,

0:46:26.880 --> 0:46:29.239
<v Speaker 2>or trying to get an interloper away from the group,

0:46:29.320 --> 0:46:32.360
<v Speaker 2>throwing rocks and sticks is a common behavior there, but

0:46:32.400 --> 0:46:35.720
<v Speaker 2>it's also not just aggressive interactions those are the most common.

0:46:35.760 --> 0:46:39.080
<v Speaker 2>There are, also, in fewer cases, more benign examples, like

0:46:39.360 --> 0:46:42.799
<v Speaker 2>particularly in bonobos and some monkeys, where throwing can be

0:46:42.840 --> 0:46:45.839
<v Speaker 2>a bid to initiate play or some other type of

0:46:45.880 --> 0:46:47.359
<v Speaker 2>non threatening communication.

0:46:48.080 --> 0:46:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, of pebbles on the winddill again here.

0:46:50.800 --> 0:46:53.239
<v Speaker 2>So for the most part, it seems chimps don't really

0:46:53.360 --> 0:46:57.320
<v Speaker 2>hunt or power scavenge by throwing. They throw most often

0:46:57.360 --> 0:47:01.200
<v Speaker 2>as a threatening display toward other chimps or to communicate

0:47:01.239 --> 0:47:03.239
<v Speaker 2>in some way. But you can see how this behavior

0:47:03.600 --> 0:47:08.000
<v Speaker 2>could bridge over into power scavenging if you're generally throwing

0:47:08.040 --> 0:47:12.359
<v Speaker 2>to threaten, so you know, it starts off with agonistic interactions,

0:47:12.440 --> 0:47:15.800
<v Speaker 2>and then maybe sometimes you throw to threaten a predator

0:47:15.840 --> 0:47:19.319
<v Speaker 2>that is there with a kill, and instead you drive

0:47:19.360 --> 0:47:22.120
<v Speaker 2>the predator away and you take the meat. This creates

0:47:22.120 --> 0:47:25.240
<v Speaker 2>an association between throwing to threaten and a meat reward

0:47:25.440 --> 0:47:30.280
<v Speaker 2>that could increasingly lead to throwing to hunt directly, especially

0:47:30.280 --> 0:47:33.719
<v Speaker 2>if you were able to create modified projectiles such as spears.

0:47:34.280 --> 0:47:37.560
<v Speaker 2>So it makes me wonder like if those specific chimpanzees

0:47:37.600 --> 0:47:40.799
<v Speaker 2>observed by Jane Goodall, if they were in fact using

0:47:40.920 --> 0:47:43.560
<v Speaker 2>rocks to hunt or aid in hunting in some way.

0:47:44.560 --> 0:47:46.200
<v Speaker 2>You kind of have to wonder if maybe they're on

0:47:46.239 --> 0:47:49.040
<v Speaker 2>the bleeding edge of chimp technology in some way like

0:47:49.760 --> 0:47:52.200
<v Speaker 2>the one. Those are the ones who, if left alone

0:47:52.239 --> 0:47:54.960
<v Speaker 2>for a few hundred thousand years, might evolve to select

0:47:55.000 --> 0:47:58.920
<v Speaker 2>anatomical traits that favor throwing, and you know, modify objects

0:47:58.960 --> 0:48:01.960
<v Speaker 2>from their environment to make their throwing more effective.

0:48:03.000 --> 0:48:06.359
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah, this fascinating, this sort of you can see

0:48:06.560 --> 0:48:11.280
<v Speaker 1>the links here between, like this sort of growing understanding

0:48:11.520 --> 0:48:15.040
<v Speaker 1>to some degree that being able to throw an object

0:48:15.040 --> 0:48:19.800
<v Speaker 1>at another creature is a way to alter its behavior

0:48:19.960 --> 0:48:22.799
<v Speaker 1>or disrupt its behavior at a distance. Yeah, and then

0:48:23.080 --> 0:48:27.600
<v Speaker 1>that potential extra step in realizing that this also can

0:48:27.680 --> 0:48:30.960
<v Speaker 1>harm the animal, and then there are ways to enhance

0:48:31.000 --> 0:48:35.719
<v Speaker 1>the materials so as to increase harm. Yeah, it's fascinating.

0:48:36.400 --> 0:48:38.640
<v Speaker 2>So what do I think about their hypothesis here. I

0:48:38.680 --> 0:48:41.320
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't say I'm one hundred percent convinced, but it seems

0:48:41.400 --> 0:48:43.279
<v Speaker 2>very plausible. They make a pretty good case.

0:48:43.920 --> 0:48:48.120
<v Speaker 1>All right, So hopefully this episode will help us, you know, Spook,

0:48:48.160 --> 0:48:50.719
<v Speaker 1>you will help mess you up the next time you

0:48:50.800 --> 0:48:53.920
<v Speaker 1>need to try and throw something with intention and direction,

0:48:54.640 --> 0:48:58.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe in your next softball game, maybe the next time

0:48:58.239 --> 0:49:02.719
<v Speaker 1>you go to beer somebody at an outdoor party. They'll

0:49:02.760 --> 0:49:05.879
<v Speaker 1>just be that moment of doubt where you run through

0:49:05.920 --> 0:49:08.440
<v Speaker 1>the evolutionary history of getting to this point and then

0:49:08.480 --> 0:49:09.480
<v Speaker 1>you miss your target.

0:49:09.680 --> 0:49:11.360
<v Speaker 2>Yep, overthink it and then slice.

0:49:11.680 --> 0:49:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, all right, well, we'd love to hear from anyone

0:49:15.640 --> 0:49:18.600
<v Speaker 1>out there if you have any thoughts and feedback related

0:49:18.600 --> 0:49:22.360
<v Speaker 1>to this episode or other episodes in this series about

0:49:22.719 --> 0:49:27.080
<v Speaker 1>humans throwing things, animals throwing things right in we'd love

0:49:27.120 --> 0:49:29.400
<v Speaker 1>to hear from you. And of course we could potentially

0:49:29.680 --> 0:49:32.880
<v Speaker 1>keep going with this topic. So we're gonna we're gonna

0:49:32.880 --> 0:49:36.359
<v Speaker 1>discuss after we wrap this episode and see if we're

0:49:36.480 --> 0:49:39.040
<v Speaker 1>going to part four now or if we're gonna come

0:49:39.040 --> 0:49:40.440
<v Speaker 1>back in the future. I don't know. We don't have

0:49:40.440 --> 0:49:43.400
<v Speaker 1>to tune in Thursday to see what happens. In the meantime,

0:49:43.440 --> 0:49:45.520
<v Speaker 1>we'll remind you that Stuff to Blow Your Mind is

0:49:45.560 --> 0:49:49.320
<v Speaker 1>a science podcast that publishes core episodes on Tuesdays and Thursdays,

0:49:49.320 --> 0:49:51.760
<v Speaker 1>and the Stuff to Blow Your Mind podcast feed On Mondays,

0:49:51.800 --> 0:49:53.960
<v Speaker 1>we do listener mail, on Wednesdays we do a short

0:49:53.960 --> 0:49:57.000
<v Speaker 1>form artifact or monster fact episode, and on Fridays we

0:49:57.040 --> 0:50:00.640
<v Speaker 1>set aside most serious concerns to discuss a weird movie

0:50:00.680 --> 0:50:01.800
<v Speaker 1>on Weird House Cinema.

0:50:02.440 --> 0:50:06.200
<v Speaker 2>Huge thanks to our audio producer JJ Posway. If you

0:50:06.200 --> 0:50:08.400
<v Speaker 2>would like to get in touch with us with feedback

0:50:08.400 --> 0:50:10.640
<v Speaker 2>on this episode or any other, to suggest a topic

0:50:10.640 --> 0:50:12.480
<v Speaker 2>for the future, or just to say hello. You can

0:50:12.520 --> 0:50:15.200
<v Speaker 2>email us at contact at stuff to Blow your Mind

0:50:15.320 --> 0:50:22.360
<v Speaker 2>dot com.

0:50:24.000 --> 0:50:26.920
<v Speaker 3>Stuff to Blow Your Mind is production of iHeartRadio. For

0:50:27.000 --> 0:50:30.840
<v Speaker 3>more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:50:30.920 --> 0:50:46.280
<v Speaker 3>or wherever you're listening to your favorite shows.