WEBVTT - Tech News: Beware of Chinese and Korean Hackers

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:11.800 --> 0:00:14.280
<v Speaker 1>He there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host,

0:00:14.400 --> 0:00:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Johnan Strickland. I'm an executive producer for I Heart Radio.

0:00:17.560 --> 0:00:20.480
<v Speaker 1>And how the tech are you. It's time for the

0:00:20.520 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>tech news for Thursday, July seven, two thousand twenty two.

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:28.200
<v Speaker 1>And while the biggest news today is about a world

0:00:28.320 --> 0:00:31.760
<v Speaker 1>leader resigning, that's not directly related to text. So we'll

0:00:31.800 --> 0:00:34.280
<v Speaker 1>just have to settle on some runners up and this

0:00:34.320 --> 0:00:37.319
<v Speaker 1>will be a fairly quick episode, I think. Now. Our

0:00:37.320 --> 0:00:40.960
<v Speaker 1>first story is about a man named Brennan Lawson who

0:00:40.960 --> 0:00:44.080
<v Speaker 1>has sued his former employer, which happens to be Meta,

0:00:44.440 --> 0:00:50.599
<v Speaker 1>you know, Facebook. Lawslin was part of Facebook's escalations team.

0:00:50.680 --> 0:00:52.600
<v Speaker 1>For those who are not in the know, and I

0:00:52.720 --> 0:00:55.240
<v Speaker 1>count myself among them because I learned about this today.

0:00:55.440 --> 0:01:00.440
<v Speaker 1>The escalations team is part of Facebook's content moderation strategy. UH.

0:01:00.440 --> 0:01:06.560
<v Speaker 1>The escalation team typically handles higher profile content moderation instances,

0:01:06.600 --> 0:01:10.680
<v Speaker 1>such as when someone in a government position flags content

0:01:10.840 --> 0:01:15.080
<v Speaker 1>on Facebook, so it's kind of the fast lane for

0:01:15.240 --> 0:01:19.880
<v Speaker 1>content review and moderation. Anyway, Lawson claims that while he

0:01:19.920 --> 0:01:22.759
<v Speaker 1>was working in that department, he saw that Facebook employees

0:01:22.760 --> 0:01:27.679
<v Speaker 1>could retrieve information that users had deleted, such as messages

0:01:27.800 --> 0:01:31.760
<v Speaker 1>that were sent between different users on Facebook Messenger. That

0:01:31.880 --> 0:01:36.320
<v Speaker 1>actually contradicts Facebook's claims that once a user deletes content

0:01:36.400 --> 0:01:40.760
<v Speaker 1>off the platform, Facebook subsequently wipes that content off its

0:01:40.800 --> 0:01:44.400
<v Speaker 1>own servers. Lawson said that there were cases in which

0:01:44.480 --> 0:01:48.840
<v Speaker 1>law enforcement would demand access to user information during investigations,

0:01:48.840 --> 0:01:53.800
<v Speaker 1>for example, and that Facebook employees would regularly retrieve information,

0:01:54.040 --> 0:01:57.520
<v Speaker 1>including the deleted stuff, and then review it before deciding

0:01:57.520 --> 0:02:01.160
<v Speaker 1>what to pass on to law enforcement. Lawson objected to

0:02:01.240 --> 0:02:06.360
<v Speaker 1>this practice, saying that Facebook was, you know, being disingenuous,

0:02:06.440 --> 0:02:09.760
<v Speaker 1>is being dishonest with its users. Lawson claims he was

0:02:09.800 --> 0:02:14.480
<v Speaker 1>subsequently fired in a retaliatory action, one that Facebook masked

0:02:14.720 --> 0:02:18.240
<v Speaker 1>by saying that it was actually because Lawson had mishandled

0:02:18.240 --> 0:02:20.840
<v Speaker 1>a situation in which he attempted to help his grandmother,

0:02:21.320 --> 0:02:25.720
<v Speaker 1>who said her account had been hacked. According to Business Insider,

0:02:26.400 --> 0:02:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Facebook said Lawson failed to fill out a field in

0:02:29.840 --> 0:02:33.760
<v Speaker 1>an online form with his grandmother's email address. Now, I

0:02:33.760 --> 0:02:37.000
<v Speaker 1>didn't realize that was such a terrible mistake that it

0:02:37.040 --> 0:02:41.560
<v Speaker 1>would warrant termination anyway. If Lawson's claims are true, then

0:02:41.680 --> 0:02:44.440
<v Speaker 1>I expect we'll see a lot more pressure applied to Facebook.

0:02:44.600 --> 0:02:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Presumably this capability to look at deleted material wouldn't work

0:02:50.400 --> 0:02:53.320
<v Speaker 1>if you were to enable end to end encryption in

0:02:53.400 --> 0:02:57.480
<v Speaker 1>your Facebook messenger app, assuming that it really is true

0:02:57.600 --> 0:03:00.320
<v Speaker 1>end to end encryption, because if it is is, then

0:03:00.400 --> 0:03:04.239
<v Speaker 1>no other parties besides the ones actually in the conversation

0:03:04.680 --> 0:03:07.679
<v Speaker 1>should be able to see the contents of that conversation.

0:03:07.800 --> 0:03:10.160
<v Speaker 1>So I guess this is really me saying that if

0:03:10.200 --> 0:03:13.440
<v Speaker 1>you want your private messages to remain private, you should

0:03:13.480 --> 0:03:17.080
<v Speaker 1>switch to end to end encryption, because that's not on

0:03:17.240 --> 0:03:20.280
<v Speaker 1>by default. We've got a couple of stories about law

0:03:20.320 --> 0:03:25.000
<v Speaker 1>enforcement agencies and intelligence operations issuing warnings about hackers, and

0:03:25.080 --> 0:03:29.320
<v Speaker 1>first up, it's all about China. The US FBI and

0:03:29.400 --> 0:03:32.640
<v Speaker 1>the u k m I five issued a joint statement

0:03:32.760 --> 0:03:36.880
<v Speaker 1>warning the world about Chinese hackers and the country's increased

0:03:36.920 --> 0:03:41.600
<v Speaker 1>online activity. The warning largely focused on two different kinds

0:03:41.640 --> 0:03:45.440
<v Speaker 1>of threats. One involves attempts to interfere in political and

0:03:45.480 --> 0:03:50.120
<v Speaker 1>democratic processes in various countries. The two agencies indicated that

0:03:50.200 --> 0:03:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Chinese hackers had been actively attempting to disrupt elections in

0:03:54.160 --> 0:03:59.440
<v Speaker 1>various countries, really in an effort to shape global politics. Uh,

0:03:59.720 --> 0:04:02.240
<v Speaker 1>most lee in a way that benefits China, which is

0:04:02.240 --> 0:04:05.200
<v Speaker 1>pretty you know, that's that's pretty obvious. I guess The

0:04:05.280 --> 0:04:09.920
<v Speaker 1>other big branch involves technological espionage, namely that Chinese hackers

0:04:09.920 --> 0:04:14.880
<v Speaker 1>are attempting to steal technology and information, and that China

0:04:15.000 --> 0:04:19.040
<v Speaker 1>poses as a huge threat to Western businesses. In fact,

0:04:19.320 --> 0:04:23.000
<v Speaker 1>FBI Director Christopher Ray said that China's hacking department is

0:04:23.120 --> 0:04:28.480
<v Speaker 1>quote bigger than that of every other major country combined

0:04:29.160 --> 0:04:33.919
<v Speaker 1>end quote. Representatives from China were quick to dismiss the claims,

0:04:33.960 --> 0:04:36.599
<v Speaker 1>saying that they are untrue and it's an example of

0:04:36.640 --> 0:04:42.560
<v Speaker 1>Western countries demonizing China. The FBI also issued another warning

0:04:42.680 --> 0:04:47.800
<v Speaker 1>about hackers, this time regarding North Korean state sponsored hacking groups.

0:04:48.680 --> 0:04:53.120
<v Speaker 1>This warning was about ransomware attacks. North Korean hackers have

0:04:53.200 --> 0:04:57.400
<v Speaker 1>been targeting various healthcare institutions with these attacks, attempting to

0:04:57.520 --> 0:05:01.240
<v Speaker 1>lock down computer network systems while demanding ransoms to return

0:05:01.320 --> 0:05:05.960
<v Speaker 1>operations to the healthcare entities. Obviously, any disruption of a

0:05:05.960 --> 0:05:09.800
<v Speaker 1>healthcare company's system is a crisis, which is why hackers

0:05:09.839 --> 0:05:13.880
<v Speaker 1>target these organizations in the first place. It's very difficult

0:05:13.960 --> 0:05:16.600
<v Speaker 1>to tell a hospital to be patient and to not

0:05:16.800 --> 0:05:20.760
<v Speaker 1>pay off a ransom when patients lives could potentially hang

0:05:20.800 --> 0:05:24.360
<v Speaker 1>in the balance. The FBI stresses that paying a ransom

0:05:24.560 --> 0:05:27.800
<v Speaker 1>is never a good idea. For one thing, there's never

0:05:27.839 --> 0:05:30.719
<v Speaker 1>a guarantee that the hackers will actually return access to

0:05:30.760 --> 0:05:33.840
<v Speaker 1>the locked off systems, so you could pay and still

0:05:33.880 --> 0:05:37.800
<v Speaker 1>be locked out. But another reason is because every ransom

0:05:37.880 --> 0:05:41.440
<v Speaker 1>that is paid ends up justifying the attack. If the

0:05:41.480 --> 0:05:44.479
<v Speaker 1>attacks end up being profitable, then there's going to be

0:05:44.520 --> 0:05:48.760
<v Speaker 1>more attacks. If targets refuse to pay ransoms, the attacks

0:05:48.800 --> 0:05:51.320
<v Speaker 1>don't pay off, and you know, the thought goes the

0:05:51.320 --> 0:05:54.760
<v Speaker 1>hackers will turn to something else rather than spending their

0:05:54.800 --> 0:05:57.960
<v Speaker 1>time and effort doing something that nets them no financial gain.

0:05:58.720 --> 0:06:02.719
<v Speaker 1>As for why North Korea sponsoring these attacks, the hypothesis

0:06:02.880 --> 0:06:05.240
<v Speaker 1>is that it's all in an effort to secure more

0:06:05.320 --> 0:06:09.120
<v Speaker 1>funds to pay for weapons such as nuclear weapons, as

0:06:09.240 --> 0:06:13.200
<v Speaker 1>various sanctions around the world have otherwise placed tight restrictions

0:06:13.240 --> 0:06:17.279
<v Speaker 1>on North Korea. One hacking story that we've talked about

0:06:17.400 --> 0:06:22.159
<v Speaker 1>several times on Tech Stuff involves Apple devices. You might

0:06:22.279 --> 0:06:26.520
<v Speaker 1>remember the Israeli company n s O Group famous for

0:06:26.680 --> 0:06:31.159
<v Speaker 1>creating a product called Pegasus. Pegasus is essentially an attack

0:06:31.240 --> 0:06:35.159
<v Speaker 1>that can compromise an iOS device like an iPhone simply

0:06:35.200 --> 0:06:39.440
<v Speaker 1>by sending this attack over I message. The target wouldn't

0:06:39.480 --> 0:06:42.919
<v Speaker 1>even have to open the message for that attack to work,

0:06:43.279 --> 0:06:46.599
<v Speaker 1>at least previously, so their phone would just become a

0:06:46.680 --> 0:06:50.240
<v Speaker 1>surveillance device that was really under the control of the

0:06:50.279 --> 0:06:54.719
<v Speaker 1>person who committed the attack. While Apple would subsequently patch

0:06:54.760 --> 0:06:59.440
<v Speaker 1>out that particular vulnerability, The experience prompted the company to

0:06:59.640 --> 0:07:04.320
<v Speaker 1>create a new feature called lockdown Mode. Now, lockdown mode

0:07:04.440 --> 0:07:09.800
<v Speaker 1>is meant for high profile iPhone users, people like politicians, journalists,

0:07:10.240 --> 0:07:13.720
<v Speaker 1>political activists, that kind of thing, the type of people

0:07:13.720 --> 0:07:17.200
<v Speaker 1>who would frequently become the targets of this type of attack,

0:07:17.280 --> 0:07:21.080
<v Speaker 1>because you know, NSL group sells this this tool to

0:07:21.880 --> 0:07:27.800
<v Speaker 1>various country governments, many of which are, let's say they

0:07:27.880 --> 0:07:33.520
<v Speaker 1>lean heavily authoritarian. And while the claim is that this

0:07:33.600 --> 0:07:36.640
<v Speaker 1>tool is meant to help fight things like terrorism, the

0:07:36.720 --> 0:07:40.000
<v Speaker 1>reality is this tool has been used to attack lots

0:07:40.040 --> 0:07:43.360
<v Speaker 1>of different people, many of whom are not terrorists, but

0:07:43.760 --> 0:07:51.280
<v Speaker 1>do pose a threat to authoritarian regimes. So lockdown mode

0:07:51.320 --> 0:07:54.120
<v Speaker 1>turns off many of the iPhones features in an effort

0:07:54.160 --> 0:07:57.680
<v Speaker 1>to reduce the pathways that a hacker could take to

0:07:57.800 --> 0:08:02.240
<v Speaker 1>compromise an iOS device. So one such feature would be

0:08:02.240 --> 0:08:05.400
<v Speaker 1>the preview function and eye message. You know this, this

0:08:05.480 --> 0:08:09.920
<v Speaker 1>function that would have activated an attack like Pegasus. However,

0:08:09.960 --> 0:08:13.440
<v Speaker 1>there are also a ton of other features that lockdown

0:08:13.440 --> 0:08:17.480
<v Speaker 1>mode disables, including ones that most users would probably want

0:08:17.560 --> 0:08:22.360
<v Speaker 1>to retain access to. Like, you probably don't want to

0:08:22.400 --> 0:08:24.800
<v Speaker 1>put your phone in lockdown mode if you're just a

0:08:24.840 --> 0:08:29.400
<v Speaker 1>typical user. And again, Apple intends lockdown mode for those

0:08:29.480 --> 0:08:31.920
<v Speaker 1>users who are more likely to be targeted by these

0:08:32.000 --> 0:08:35.560
<v Speaker 1>kinds of attacks, you know, like state sponsored attacks. Most

0:08:35.600 --> 0:08:39.360
<v Speaker 1>of us don't warrant that kind of attention. Uh. The

0:08:39.440 --> 0:08:41.719
<v Speaker 1>mode goes into a beta test this week, and from

0:08:41.720 --> 0:08:44.600
<v Speaker 1>what I understand, it will be available to all iPhone

0:08:44.679 --> 0:08:47.600
<v Speaker 1>users later this year. So while you might not have

0:08:47.760 --> 0:08:50.480
<v Speaker 1>a need for this feature, it should be available to

0:08:50.559 --> 0:08:52.840
<v Speaker 1>you if you would want to enable it. Just know

0:08:52.960 --> 0:08:55.880
<v Speaker 1>that if you do enable it, you'll be eliminating a

0:08:55.960 --> 0:08:59.679
<v Speaker 1>whole bunch of the selling points that Apple leans on

0:08:59.760 --> 0:09:03.000
<v Speaker 1>when it's promoting the iPhone. Then again, if you are

0:09:03.040 --> 0:09:06.400
<v Speaker 1>a high profile user, that tradeoff might not be such

0:09:06.400 --> 0:09:09.360
<v Speaker 1>a bad deal. It's been a hot minute since I've

0:09:09.360 --> 0:09:12.520
<v Speaker 1>mentioned Elon Musk in one of these episodes, and really

0:09:12.600 --> 0:09:16.079
<v Speaker 1>it's just gonna be a tangential thing here because this

0:09:16.160 --> 0:09:19.320
<v Speaker 1>is more about how employees who are leaving Tesla are

0:09:19.360 --> 0:09:22.760
<v Speaker 1>getting scooped up in other big tech companies. So Musk

0:09:22.840 --> 0:09:24.760
<v Speaker 1>tweeted a few weeks ago that they were going to

0:09:24.800 --> 0:09:27.240
<v Speaker 1>be cutbacks at Tesla. Then he kind of went back

0:09:27.280 --> 0:09:30.160
<v Speaker 1>and forth about what that actually meant. And he also

0:09:30.240 --> 0:09:33.120
<v Speaker 1>demanded that employees put in a full forty hour work

0:09:33.120 --> 0:09:37.040
<v Speaker 1>week at the office before even thinking about working remotely,

0:09:37.480 --> 0:09:40.160
<v Speaker 1>which you know, some folks interpreted as an attempt to

0:09:40.280 --> 0:09:45.040
<v Speaker 1>encourage employees to resign rather than have to go through layoffs. Well,

0:09:45.120 --> 0:09:49.400
<v Speaker 1>a report from Punks and pen Stripes, which describes itself

0:09:49.440 --> 0:09:54.040
<v Speaker 1>as a quote private network of transformation executives end quote,

0:09:54.200 --> 0:09:58.400
<v Speaker 1>has tracked some four fifty former Tesla employees as they

0:09:58.440 --> 0:10:01.720
<v Speaker 1>moved on and updated their linked in profiles to indicate

0:10:01.720 --> 0:10:04.800
<v Speaker 1>where they had gone to. So, according to those changes

0:10:04.840 --> 0:10:08.760
<v Speaker 1>on LinkedIn, ninety former Tesla employees found work with rival

0:10:08.840 --> 0:10:14.760
<v Speaker 1>electric vehicle companies Rivian and Lucid Motors. Eight former Tesla

0:10:14.840 --> 0:10:17.559
<v Speaker 1>employees listed their new employer as one of the more

0:10:17.640 --> 0:10:21.280
<v Speaker 1>traditional auto manufacturing companies. That is, you know, a company

0:10:21.320 --> 0:10:24.960
<v Speaker 1>that might make electric vehicles, but it's not exclusively in

0:10:24.960 --> 0:10:29.000
<v Speaker 1>that business, so companies like Ford or General Motors. Other

0:10:29.080 --> 0:10:34.920
<v Speaker 1>former Tesla folks moved to companies like Apple, Google, Meta, Microsoft,

0:10:35.000 --> 0:10:38.320
<v Speaker 1>and Amazon, some of them going to an Amazon backed

0:10:38.360 --> 0:10:42.360
<v Speaker 1>company called zooks zo o X, which is an autonomous

0:10:42.440 --> 0:10:46.640
<v Speaker 1>vehicle company. A few ten in fact kept it in

0:10:46.679 --> 0:10:49.640
<v Speaker 1>the family then moved on over to SpaceX, a different

0:10:49.679 --> 0:10:52.960
<v Speaker 1>elhon must company. And this report is kind of interesting

0:10:52.960 --> 0:10:55.360
<v Speaker 1>because a lot of news pieces have talked about how

0:10:56.000 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 1>companies in the tech sector have largely initiated hiring free

0:11:00.040 --> 0:11:03.440
<v Speaker 1>is uh and and these changes make it sound like

0:11:03.520 --> 0:11:06.480
<v Speaker 1>it's not quite at that level. There are companies that

0:11:06.559 --> 0:11:09.600
<v Speaker 1>have put in hiring freezes, but it's not industry wide.

0:11:10.240 --> 0:11:12.760
<v Speaker 1>A lot of companies have been cutting back on hiring,

0:11:13.000 --> 0:11:16.839
<v Speaker 1>but they haven't eliminated it entirely. So just to kind

0:11:16.840 --> 0:11:21.240
<v Speaker 1>of mitigate some of the fear, uncertainty and doubt out there.

0:11:21.440 --> 0:11:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Not to say that things are hunky dory and all rosy,

0:11:25.440 --> 0:11:29.000
<v Speaker 1>but they're not. They're also not as dire as some

0:11:29.200 --> 0:11:33.160
<v Speaker 1>reports tend to make it out to be. Now, there

0:11:33.200 --> 0:11:36.600
<v Speaker 1>are plenty of signs of concern that economic factors are

0:11:36.600 --> 0:11:40.640
<v Speaker 1>going to remain let's say, challenging for the near future,

0:11:40.720 --> 0:11:43.800
<v Speaker 1>so we should keep that in mind as well. We'll

0:11:43.840 --> 0:11:47.360
<v Speaker 1>have some more stories, but first let's take a quick break.

0:11:55.200 --> 0:11:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Before the break, we were talking electric vehicles, and speaking

0:11:57.960 --> 0:12:02.240
<v Speaker 1>of e vs, Consumer Reports released a survey result that

0:12:02.360 --> 0:12:05.679
<v Speaker 1>indicated that twenty eight percent of Americans who are surveyed

0:12:05.760 --> 0:12:09.320
<v Speaker 1>say they would not buy an electric vehicle. And you

0:12:09.400 --> 0:12:12.160
<v Speaker 1>might wonder, well, what's the reason why did they say that?

0:12:12.360 --> 0:12:15.720
<v Speaker 1>And there are actually several different reasons that people cited.

0:12:16.000 --> 0:12:19.600
<v Speaker 1>One is the concern about driving range. You know, how

0:12:19.640 --> 0:12:22.040
<v Speaker 1>far you can go on a single charge in an

0:12:22.040 --> 0:12:27.400
<v Speaker 1>electric vehicle. There's this continuing fear of becoming stranded, like

0:12:27.480 --> 0:12:29.880
<v Speaker 1>on a highway because your car ran out of juice.

0:12:30.480 --> 0:12:35.320
<v Speaker 1>That fear really isn't an issue for most people under

0:12:35.480 --> 0:12:39.719
<v Speaker 1>normal driving situations. Electric vehicles have ranges well beyond what

0:12:39.800 --> 0:12:42.760
<v Speaker 1>most commutes involved. So like the average commute in the

0:12:42.840 --> 0:12:46.240
<v Speaker 1>United States is between thirty and forty miles round trip,

0:12:46.640 --> 0:12:49.000
<v Speaker 1>and electric vehicles typically have a driving range of more

0:12:49.040 --> 0:12:53.120
<v Speaker 1>than two hundred miles, like two hundred thirty miles. A

0:12:53.160 --> 0:12:54.680
<v Speaker 1>couple of years ago, it was actually higher, it was

0:12:54.679 --> 0:12:58.280
<v Speaker 1>like two fifty miles on a single charge. So assuming

0:12:58.800 --> 0:13:01.200
<v Speaker 1>you were recharging your v hicle at home every day,

0:13:01.679 --> 0:13:03.880
<v Speaker 1>you'd be fine to go to and from work, plus

0:13:03.920 --> 0:13:06.320
<v Speaker 1>run all your errands and not have to worry about

0:13:06.640 --> 0:13:10.280
<v Speaker 1>running out of battery. Road trips would be a different story,

0:13:10.320 --> 0:13:14.040
<v Speaker 1>of course. But another big concern that people cited was

0:13:14.120 --> 0:13:17.319
<v Speaker 1>the lack of charging stations. That there's not the infrastructure

0:13:17.320 --> 0:13:20.719
<v Speaker 1>to support electric vehicles. And it is true that there

0:13:20.720 --> 0:13:25.760
<v Speaker 1>are not nearly as many electric vehicle recharging stations, and

0:13:25.800 --> 0:13:29.760
<v Speaker 1>they're not nearly as accessible as gas stations are, like

0:13:30.000 --> 0:13:35.040
<v Speaker 1>those outnumber electric vehicle charging stations by a huge factor.

0:13:35.800 --> 0:13:38.079
<v Speaker 1>But another reason that people said they wouldn't buy any

0:13:38.240 --> 0:13:41.000
<v Speaker 1>v was because of the cost of electric vehicles. And

0:13:41.040 --> 0:13:44.080
<v Speaker 1>they are pretty darn expensive. And that's even within the

0:13:44.120 --> 0:13:47.760
<v Speaker 1>context of how all cars are pretty darn expensive right now.

0:13:48.280 --> 0:13:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Consumer Reports indicates that a lack of education about electric

0:13:51.800 --> 0:13:56.439
<v Speaker 1>vehicles is one of the reasons for this significant response.

0:13:56.640 --> 0:13:58.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we're talking about more than a quarter of

0:13:58.600 --> 0:14:01.880
<v Speaker 1>all those who were surveyed here. It appears that many

0:14:01.960 --> 0:14:05.840
<v Speaker 1>of those survey didn't know about various economic incentives that

0:14:05.880 --> 0:14:08.760
<v Speaker 1>can offset the price of electric vehicles, nor did they

0:14:08.800 --> 0:14:12.080
<v Speaker 1>understand the driving range capability of these vehicles, So it

0:14:12.080 --> 0:14:15.160
<v Speaker 1>could be that more education would mean future surveys would

0:14:15.200 --> 0:14:19.400
<v Speaker 1>show very different results. More education is definitely needed if

0:14:19.400 --> 0:14:21.920
<v Speaker 1>we want to see more states push for moving off

0:14:21.960 --> 0:14:26.600
<v Speaker 1>of internal combustion engine vehicles in favor of electric vehicles. Uh.

0:14:26.640 --> 0:14:30.720
<v Speaker 1>If we don't have education and people are acting on

0:14:30.760 --> 0:14:34.720
<v Speaker 1>a misunderstanding of the capabilities of e vs, then they're

0:14:34.760 --> 0:14:38.200
<v Speaker 1>more likely to you know, vote against it, which when

0:14:38.240 --> 0:14:43.960
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about finding ways to reduce climate impact. Uh,

0:14:44.360 --> 0:14:48.360
<v Speaker 1>we need every single step to go in the right direction,

0:14:48.600 --> 0:14:53.320
<v Speaker 1>and any delay is just gonna make matters worse. The

0:14:53.360 --> 0:14:57.240
<v Speaker 1>Competition and Markets Authority or c m A in the

0:14:57.360 --> 0:15:01.280
<v Speaker 1>UK is investigating Amazon to see if the company is

0:15:01.360 --> 0:15:04.440
<v Speaker 1>unfairly rigging the game on its platform. And I almost

0:15:04.440 --> 0:15:08.440
<v Speaker 1>didn't include this story because I'm certain it's one we've

0:15:08.440 --> 0:15:11.760
<v Speaker 1>talked about before, but apparently this is a more recent investigation.

0:15:12.080 --> 0:15:15.640
<v Speaker 1>So at issue here is how Amazon promotes Amazon owned

0:15:15.880 --> 0:15:20.000
<v Speaker 1>brands to consumers, and the argument is that Amazon will

0:15:20.000 --> 0:15:25.040
<v Speaker 1>display its own brands ahead of competitors, which pushes customers

0:15:25.080 --> 0:15:28.240
<v Speaker 1>to buy more Amazon products, and those might not be

0:15:28.320 --> 0:15:30.640
<v Speaker 1>the best version of you know, whatever the product is,

0:15:31.000 --> 0:15:33.320
<v Speaker 1>or it might not be the least expensive or whatever,

0:15:34.200 --> 0:15:38.240
<v Speaker 1>so customers could be sent to purchase a quote unquote

0:15:38.280 --> 0:15:44.560
<v Speaker 1>bad deal, and that Amazon is profiting over its competitors

0:15:44.600 --> 0:15:47.200
<v Speaker 1>because it's not giving the competitors a fair shake for

0:15:47.240 --> 0:15:50.080
<v Speaker 1>customers to even see the products. And we've seen this

0:15:50.120 --> 0:15:52.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of case pop up several times, like including in

0:15:52.720 --> 0:15:55.800
<v Speaker 1>the EU and here in America, and not just targeting Amazon,

0:15:55.880 --> 0:16:00.000
<v Speaker 1>although that is a frequent target of this particular criticism.

0:16:00.120 --> 0:16:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Lots of companies have been accused of promoting their own

0:16:03.040 --> 0:16:07.200
<v Speaker 1>products on their own platforms and then subsequently kind of

0:16:07.240 --> 0:16:10.280
<v Speaker 1>burying the competition in the process. If we were to

0:16:10.360 --> 0:16:12.960
<v Speaker 1>use an analogy, imagine that you go to a grocery

0:16:12.960 --> 0:16:17.400
<v Speaker 1>store and all the store branded products are in prominent

0:16:17.400 --> 0:16:22.040
<v Speaker 1>locations on shelves. They're organized, they're shiny, they're lovely, and

0:16:22.080 --> 0:16:25.320
<v Speaker 1>then all the name brand stuff, which is not owned

0:16:25.360 --> 0:16:28.560
<v Speaker 1>by the store is hidden off in corners or high

0:16:28.640 --> 0:16:31.120
<v Speaker 1>up on shelves where they're hard to reach, or maybe

0:16:31.200 --> 0:16:33.880
<v Speaker 1>on the bottom shelf where it's hard to see. That's

0:16:33.960 --> 0:16:36.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of what the c m A is looking into

0:16:36.080 --> 0:16:39.480
<v Speaker 1>with Amazon. Company reps say that Amazon will work with

0:16:39.520 --> 0:16:41.720
<v Speaker 1>the c m A during this investigation and that the

0:16:41.720 --> 0:16:45.720
<v Speaker 1>company has quote always worked hard to help small businesses

0:16:45.880 --> 0:16:49.320
<v Speaker 1>selling on Amazon to succeed, which is both in their

0:16:49.640 --> 0:16:53.960
<v Speaker 1>and our best interests end quote. I suppose the investigation

0:16:54.000 --> 0:16:57.680
<v Speaker 1>will determine if that claim is in fact accurate. Finally,

0:16:57.760 --> 0:17:00.880
<v Speaker 1>research firm Ampere Analysis predicts that we're gonna see a

0:17:00.960 --> 0:17:03.320
<v Speaker 1>dip in video game sales this year, to the tune

0:17:03.360 --> 0:17:07.119
<v Speaker 1>of a one decline. Now, to put that in perspective,

0:17:07.359 --> 0:17:09.520
<v Speaker 1>we should acknowledge that the video game sector had some

0:17:09.560 --> 0:17:14.600
<v Speaker 1>pretty impressive growth over the last two years. From the

0:17:14.640 --> 0:17:17.720
<v Speaker 1>industry saw a growth of and ultimately grew to a

0:17:17.800 --> 0:17:22.040
<v Speaker 1>hundred billion dollar industry. This little dip would mean that

0:17:22.080 --> 0:17:24.280
<v Speaker 1>by the end of this year, we're looking more at

0:17:24.280 --> 0:17:29.560
<v Speaker 1>a one eight billion dollar industry that's still bookoos of buckos. Right.

0:17:29.920 --> 0:17:32.439
<v Speaker 1>As for an explanation of these changes, well, there are

0:17:32.480 --> 0:17:36.600
<v Speaker 1>a couple right. The first, and perhaps most obviously, the

0:17:36.600 --> 0:17:39.600
<v Speaker 1>pandemic created a bit of a boom for video games sales,

0:17:39.760 --> 0:17:42.960
<v Speaker 1>even as we saw numerous titles experienced production delays due

0:17:43.040 --> 0:17:46.200
<v Speaker 1>to COVID. Now we've got more folks going out and

0:17:46.240 --> 0:17:50.600
<v Speaker 1>abountain fewer of them are staying home all day every day.

0:17:50.800 --> 0:17:53.840
<v Speaker 1>Plus you know, the concern over economic recession has a

0:17:53.920 --> 0:17:57.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of people easing off on their purchases, and then

0:17:57.240 --> 0:18:00.640
<v Speaker 1>there are the continuing issues around supply. It still hard

0:18:00.680 --> 0:18:03.520
<v Speaker 1>to find the most recent consoles on the market. It's

0:18:03.520 --> 0:18:07.400
<v Speaker 1>still hard to find like the top end video game cards,

0:18:07.520 --> 0:18:12.000
<v Speaker 1>which are slowly becoming less scarce and less expensive, but

0:18:12.040 --> 0:18:15.000
<v Speaker 1>they're still not widely available, nor are they backed down

0:18:15.040 --> 0:18:18.280
<v Speaker 1>to m s r P levels. So you could think

0:18:18.280 --> 0:18:20.879
<v Speaker 1>of this dip as a type of market adjustment and

0:18:20.960 --> 0:18:23.119
<v Speaker 1>not some sort of omen that the video game sector

0:18:23.240 --> 0:18:25.880
<v Speaker 1>is in trouble as a whole. Though. You know, some

0:18:25.920 --> 0:18:29.119
<v Speaker 1>companies like Activision Blizzard are still in the hot seat

0:18:29.240 --> 0:18:32.840
<v Speaker 1>for multiple reasons, but that's another story. That's it for

0:18:32.880 --> 0:18:36.399
<v Speaker 1>today's news on tech Stuff. If you have suggestions for

0:18:36.480 --> 0:18:38.879
<v Speaker 1>future topics, please reach out to me. You can do

0:18:38.920 --> 0:18:40.679
<v Speaker 1>that in a couple of ways. One way is just

0:18:40.720 --> 0:18:43.879
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter. Our handle is tech stuff hs W. The

0:18:43.920 --> 0:18:46.639
<v Speaker 1>other way is to download the I Heart radio app

0:18:46.960 --> 0:18:49.840
<v Speaker 1>and navigate over to the tech Stuff podcast page. There's

0:18:49.840 --> 0:18:52.280
<v Speaker 1>a little microphone icon on that page you can click

0:18:52.320 --> 0:18:54.840
<v Speaker 1>on that leave a voice message up to thirty seconds

0:18:54.840 --> 0:18:56.919
<v Speaker 1>in length if you would like us to use that

0:18:57.000 --> 0:19:00.240
<v Speaker 1>in a future episode. You can let us know within

0:19:00.320 --> 0:19:03.120
<v Speaker 1>that message, because I'm all about opt in, not opt out,

0:19:03.800 --> 0:19:06.720
<v Speaker 1>and yeah, that's that's a couple of different ways to

0:19:06.720 --> 0:19:09.439
<v Speaker 1>get in touch with me. As for all of you,

0:19:09.520 --> 0:19:13.040
<v Speaker 1>I hope you're all well. I am slowly getting back

0:19:13.040 --> 0:19:16.160
<v Speaker 1>to where I was pre COVID, so I keep hoping

0:19:16.200 --> 0:19:18.119
<v Speaker 1>that the next time I record, I'll be back to

0:19:18.800 --> 0:19:22.080
<v Speaker 1>pre COVID levels of Jonathan. Not quite there yet, but

0:19:22.160 --> 0:19:26.200
<v Speaker 1>getting there, and I'll talk to you again really soon.

0:19:27.840 --> 0:19:34.919
<v Speaker 1>Y Text Stuff is an I Heart Radio production. For

0:19:35.000 --> 0:19:37.960
<v Speaker 1>more podcasts from my Heart Radio, visit the i Heart

0:19:38.040 --> 0:19:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your

0:19:41.240 --> 0:19:41.959
<v Speaker 1>favorite shows.