WEBVTT - Salesforce and C3.ai Earnings

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:03.320
<v Speaker 1>And joins us shortly, this is Bloomberg Technology coming up.

0:00:03.640 --> 0:00:07.200
<v Speaker 1>We'll break down earnings from sales voice that disappoints and

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:10.879
<v Speaker 1>C three AI, the artificial intelligence high pits reality with

0:00:10.920 --> 0:00:14.240
<v Speaker 1>disappointing earnings from that company too. But let's stick on

0:00:14.360 --> 0:00:17.160
<v Speaker 1>AI in the here and then now with Palenteer, we

0:00:17.320 --> 0:00:19.639
<v Speaker 1>go live to Palo Alto, California, where our own Ed

0:00:19.680 --> 0:00:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Ludlow is sitting down for an exclusive conversation with the

0:00:22.239 --> 0:00:23.560
<v Speaker 1>CEO but us.

0:00:23.640 --> 0:00:24.800
<v Speaker 2>We'll have more on.

0:00:24.840 --> 0:00:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Guess what artificial intelligence, how Wall Street is using it,

0:00:28.160 --> 0:00:30.760
<v Speaker 1>how the technology is replacing our jobs, and even how

0:00:30.800 --> 0:00:32.520
<v Speaker 1>AI is replacing ourselves.

0:00:32.920 --> 0:00:34.480
<v Speaker 2>We'll have more throughout the hour.

0:00:34.720 --> 0:00:37.199
<v Speaker 1>First, set's check in to an audience where we're going

0:00:37.240 --> 0:00:39.720
<v Speaker 1>to be discussing so much more the future of AI,

0:00:39.960 --> 0:00:42.519
<v Speaker 1>where the likes of one key executive who wants to

0:00:42.520 --> 0:00:44.600
<v Speaker 1>take the whole market on that. I want to welcome

0:00:44.640 --> 0:00:47.640
<v Speaker 1>our Bloomberg TV and our radio audiences. We want to

0:00:47.640 --> 0:00:49.800
<v Speaker 1>send it over now to our one Ed Ludlow, who's

0:00:49.800 --> 0:00:55.640
<v Speaker 1>sitting down with an exclusive interview the CEO of Palenteer, Ed. Yeah.

0:00:55.640 --> 0:00:58.000
<v Speaker 3>We're joined by Alex Karp, the CEO of Paneteer at

0:00:58.040 --> 0:01:01.760
<v Speaker 3>aip CON Artificial Intelligence Platform CON a chance for you

0:01:02.240 --> 0:01:05.000
<v Speaker 3>to talk with customers about some of what you told

0:01:05.040 --> 0:01:07.640
<v Speaker 3>us three weeks ago. And on that note, three weeks ago,

0:01:07.959 --> 0:01:09.560
<v Speaker 3>you said that Palente's plan.

0:01:09.520 --> 0:01:14.280
<v Speaker 4>For AI was quote, just take the whole market. How's

0:01:14.319 --> 0:01:14.720
<v Speaker 4>that going?

0:01:15.560 --> 0:01:15.840
<v Speaker 1>Well?

0:01:16.000 --> 0:01:18.800
<v Speaker 5>You know, unlike most people, we've been involved in what

0:01:18.840 --> 0:01:21.280
<v Speaker 5>people call AI for the last five six seven years

0:01:21.319 --> 0:01:24.480
<v Speaker 5>in the classified environment, building systems that will allow you

0:01:24.520 --> 0:01:27.080
<v Speaker 5>to identify adversarial positions.

0:01:28.040 --> 0:01:28.479
<v Speaker 6>And in that.

0:01:28.480 --> 0:01:31.920
<v Speaker 5>Context, we've built proprietary technology that will allow you to

0:01:31.959 --> 0:01:36.120
<v Speaker 5>work with large language models, securely, enhance them, roll them

0:01:36.160 --> 0:01:38.440
<v Speaker 5>across your whole enterprise. You know, I've been at this

0:01:38.480 --> 0:01:40.520
<v Speaker 5>for about twenty years, and I know it will take

0:01:40.560 --> 0:01:42.160
<v Speaker 5>everyone else four or five years to build this.

0:01:42.600 --> 0:01:44.560
<v Speaker 6>We're rolling it out. Our customer base.

0:01:44.480 --> 0:01:48.120
<v Speaker 5>Is large, and we have you know, usually we wait

0:01:48.520 --> 0:01:50.320
<v Speaker 5>for we have to go out and find people. Now

0:01:50.360 --> 0:01:52.440
<v Speaker 5>we have customers, especially in the US, just calling us

0:01:52.440 --> 0:01:52.840
<v Speaker 5>every day.

0:01:53.120 --> 0:01:55.600
<v Speaker 4>You said, the demand is huge, can you quantify it?

0:01:55.640 --> 0:01:59.200
<v Speaker 5>And so you know usually again we've had a number

0:01:59.240 --> 0:02:01.880
<v Speaker 5>of inbound call a year that we usually have in

0:02:01.880 --> 0:02:04.680
<v Speaker 5>a year, in like a month, and then if.

0:02:04.640 --> 0:02:06.520
<v Speaker 6>We're at a conference, if you go next door.

0:02:06.760 --> 0:02:12.200
<v Speaker 5>There are customers showing potential customers how to use our product.

0:02:12.760 --> 0:02:16.799
<v Speaker 5>Its sense well, it's on real data, it's it's it's

0:02:16.919 --> 0:02:20.240
<v Speaker 5>things that they've done so right now, the whole world

0:02:20.280 --> 0:02:22.880
<v Speaker 5>is hungry for something that it understands as AI, which

0:02:22.960 --> 0:02:26.519
<v Speaker 5>is really AI or large language models. We are actually

0:02:26.600 --> 0:02:31.400
<v Speaker 5>have customers using our products showing other customers how to

0:02:31.400 --> 0:02:31.640
<v Speaker 5>do it.

0:02:31.680 --> 0:02:33.880
<v Speaker 6>I mean this is like you release a song and

0:02:33.960 --> 0:02:37.239
<v Speaker 6>everyone else playing it. So okay, great, We're very happy.

0:02:37.680 --> 0:02:42.360
<v Speaker 5>And you know, the thing is, the US market is

0:02:42.400 --> 0:02:46.000
<v Speaker 5>just hungry for innovation. It's hungry for things. It's now beginning.

0:02:46.000 --> 0:02:48.920
<v Speaker 5>It needs to needs, you know, beginning to understand. It

0:02:48.960 --> 0:02:51.280
<v Speaker 5>needs like an ability to map a l M on

0:02:51.360 --> 0:02:54.679
<v Speaker 5>your enterprise securely, ability to enhance the output of a

0:02:54.760 --> 0:02:57.840
<v Speaker 5>large language model, and ability and and what's the output,

0:02:58.080 --> 0:02:59.720
<v Speaker 5>better margins, better safety.

0:03:00.320 --> 0:03:02.160
<v Speaker 6>You can change your enterprise in weeks.

0:03:02.800 --> 0:03:04.120
<v Speaker 3>I just want to jump in and ask a very

0:03:04.120 --> 0:03:09.640
<v Speaker 3>basic question, AIP is it built on GPT four?

0:03:10.360 --> 0:03:13.359
<v Speaker 4>We different foundation. We as the underlying.

0:03:12.960 --> 0:03:16.280
<v Speaker 5>Tech, the underlying we are completely agnostic to whatever large

0:03:16.360 --> 0:03:19.000
<v Speaker 5>language model you want to use. Large language models have

0:03:19.040 --> 0:03:22.040
<v Speaker 5>certain attributes, like they can give you reasoning, but you

0:03:22.080 --> 0:03:25.239
<v Speaker 5>can't import that reasoning into your enterprise. What AIP does

0:03:25.280 --> 0:03:26.880
<v Speaker 5>is allow you to take the benefits of the large

0:03:26.919 --> 0:03:29.760
<v Speaker 5>language model, enhance them with ILL algorithms that we help

0:03:29.800 --> 0:03:32.440
<v Speaker 5>you build and roll it securely across your whole enterprise.

0:03:32.480 --> 0:03:34.280
<v Speaker 5>And what does that mean. It means you get all

0:03:34.320 --> 0:03:37.280
<v Speaker 5>the benefits of a large language model in your enterprise today,

0:03:37.480 --> 0:03:40.800
<v Speaker 5>not in five years. Not something that writes poetry. We're

0:03:40.800 --> 0:03:44.440
<v Speaker 5>not offering people poetry writing in their enterprise. We're offering

0:03:44.480 --> 0:03:47.560
<v Speaker 5>things that are so powerful that really, in reality, I'm

0:03:47.600 --> 0:03:49.200
<v Speaker 5>not sure we should even sell this to some of

0:03:49.240 --> 0:03:51.360
<v Speaker 5>our clients like national security.

0:03:51.440 --> 0:03:54.760
<v Speaker 3>Who are those clients? Well, who are those clients proportionately?

0:03:54.800 --> 0:03:57.640
<v Speaker 3>When you think about demand, how much is coming from

0:03:57.680 --> 0:04:00.480
<v Speaker 3>the defense use case? Since you kind of gave more

0:04:00.520 --> 0:04:03.760
<v Speaker 3>flesh to the AI bones at that during that earning.

0:04:03.680 --> 0:04:07.680
<v Speaker 5>Look, what's driving the demand for our product and defense

0:04:07.760 --> 0:04:10.640
<v Speaker 5>is simply what is what people have seen on the battlefield,

0:04:10.800 --> 0:04:13.640
<v Speaker 5>and that's very sensitive and very classified. But the demand

0:04:13.680 --> 0:04:15.560
<v Speaker 5>for that is very large, it's going to get larger.

0:04:15.800 --> 0:04:17.560
<v Speaker 5>Why is it going to get larger? Because America is

0:04:17.560 --> 0:04:20.320
<v Speaker 5>the best at software. Software that's built in a product

0:04:20.360 --> 0:04:22.800
<v Speaker 5>is in high demand and defense? Why is it also

0:04:22.839 --> 0:04:25.320
<v Speaker 5>in demand because until two years ago everyone thought this

0:04:25.440 --> 0:04:27.200
<v Speaker 5>was a joke. We are building systems over the last

0:04:27.240 --> 0:04:29.760
<v Speaker 5>five years that are deadly that those deadly systems have

0:04:29.920 --> 0:04:31.080
<v Speaker 5>changed the course of history.

0:04:31.240 --> 0:04:32.960
<v Speaker 6>It's no longer mad man saying this.

0:04:33.080 --> 0:04:37.000
<v Speaker 5>You see it on the battlefield in US commercial US

0:04:37.120 --> 0:04:41.040
<v Speaker 5>commercial industry is the most adaptive in the world, and

0:04:41.080 --> 0:04:43.560
<v Speaker 5>they are hungry. Our clients are hungry for things that

0:04:43.560 --> 0:04:46.359
<v Speaker 5>will give them a disapportionate advantage on margins, on safety,

0:04:46.680 --> 0:04:49.440
<v Speaker 5>on secure use of LMS, on making sure this is

0:04:49.480 --> 0:04:53.440
<v Speaker 5>not just some poetry recreating what somebody said, but actually

0:04:53.560 --> 0:04:55.440
<v Speaker 5>can create actual tangible difference.

0:04:55.720 --> 0:04:57.760
<v Speaker 6>And we are rolling it out and we're very happy.

0:04:57.760 --> 0:05:01.040
<v Speaker 3>For our global Bloomberg television and radio audiences. We are

0:05:01.160 --> 0:05:04.120
<v Speaker 3>at aip COM. We're joined by the CEO of Palenteer,

0:05:04.680 --> 0:05:08.640
<v Speaker 3>Alex carp. During that earning school you said we have

0:05:08.760 --> 0:05:12.560
<v Speaker 3>no pricing strategy. We're going to create a lot of value.

0:05:12.800 --> 0:05:15.440
<v Speaker 3>We're going to get hundreds of customers, and we will

0:05:15.480 --> 0:05:18.240
<v Speaker 3>price it as we go. Have you made any progress

0:05:18.240 --> 0:05:19.760
<v Speaker 3>on pricing strategy since that No.

0:05:21.160 --> 0:05:22.560
<v Speaker 4>I'm so relaxed about it.

0:05:22.480 --> 0:05:25.880
<v Speaker 5>Because if you it's like one of these things like

0:05:25.920 --> 0:05:26.760
<v Speaker 5>when you go to a bar.

0:05:26.960 --> 0:05:28.960
<v Speaker 6>You know everyone wants to meet you. Do you have

0:05:29.000 --> 0:05:30.440
<v Speaker 6>a pricing strategy when you go to the bar?

0:05:30.600 --> 0:05:32.520
<v Speaker 5>No, you're like, Oh, I'm cool. I know we have

0:05:32.560 --> 0:05:33.720
<v Speaker 5>the best product on the market.

0:05:33.760 --> 0:05:35.400
<v Speaker 6>I know customers will pay us fairly.

0:05:35.640 --> 0:05:37.560
<v Speaker 5>I know that it's much more valuable than anyone will

0:05:37.600 --> 0:05:40.360
<v Speaker 5>understand till they install it, and we will sort out

0:05:40.480 --> 0:05:43.599
<v Speaker 5>there's to make it like slightly academic. I believe in

0:05:43.640 --> 0:05:46.400
<v Speaker 5>prey too optimization. We are going to create a lot

0:05:46.440 --> 0:05:48.359
<v Speaker 5>of value, and we're going to get some portion of

0:05:48.400 --> 0:05:51.080
<v Speaker 5>that value. And customers are smart, they'll pay you some

0:05:51.120 --> 0:05:53.720
<v Speaker 5>portion of the value. Why should I just as an

0:05:53.680 --> 0:05:55.720
<v Speaker 5>actually metic thing. If you have a software product, you

0:05:55.720 --> 0:05:57.919
<v Speaker 5>always want to get paid after you deliver value.

0:05:58.040 --> 0:05:58.599
<v Speaker 7>If you've got a.

0:05:58.640 --> 0:06:01.760
<v Speaker 5>PowerPoint, something that doesn't work, something that's not valuable, you

0:06:01.800 --> 0:06:02.280
<v Speaker 5>want to get.

0:06:02.160 --> 0:06:03.600
<v Speaker 6>Paid before you create value.

0:06:03.800 --> 0:06:06.440
<v Speaker 5>We know it's valuable, we know it's much more valuable

0:06:06.440 --> 0:06:09.160
<v Speaker 5>than people understand. We know we're going to continue to

0:06:09.200 --> 0:06:11.400
<v Speaker 5>augment that value, and we're going to get paid along

0:06:11.440 --> 0:06:11.719
<v Speaker 5>the way.

0:06:11.800 --> 0:06:13.919
<v Speaker 4>Well, the counter consideration is how much you invest in

0:06:13.960 --> 0:06:14.480
<v Speaker 4>the product.

0:06:14.640 --> 0:06:17.160
<v Speaker 5>But we've already invested billions of building these things in

0:06:17.240 --> 0:06:19.640
<v Speaker 5>various components over the last twenty years, and we have

0:06:19.760 --> 0:06:22.080
<v Speaker 5>the we have the IP and we're basically sewing it

0:06:22.120 --> 0:06:24.120
<v Speaker 5>together and adding things on top of it. And so

0:06:24.240 --> 0:06:27.080
<v Speaker 5>we know we have the IP, we're certain of the value.

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:29.360
<v Speaker 5>Why would we So again I come to you, I'm like, hey,

0:06:29.400 --> 0:06:30.640
<v Speaker 5>I'm certain this is very valuable.

0:06:30.760 --> 0:06:32.359
<v Speaker 6>Pay me ten million dollars. What are you going to.

0:06:32.360 --> 0:06:33.960
<v Speaker 4>Say, Well, I don't have ten many.

0:06:33.880 --> 0:06:37.000
<v Speaker 6>Until well, okay, give me your British charm.

0:06:37.040 --> 0:06:39.320
<v Speaker 3>Well and they say, well for your British charm, my

0:06:40.080 --> 0:06:42.560
<v Speaker 3>British charm. If I were a customer, would say, this

0:06:42.680 --> 0:06:46.039
<v Speaker 3>is a really hard environment. If I think about cloud exactly,

0:06:46.120 --> 0:06:48.600
<v Speaker 3>customers are looking for value at the lowest price.

0:06:48.720 --> 0:06:50.920
<v Speaker 5>Now. I but if you believe you have the best

0:06:50.920 --> 0:06:53.000
<v Speaker 5>product in the world, where are you going to say? Okay, great,

0:06:53.160 --> 0:06:54.360
<v Speaker 5>let's not even have that discussion.

0:06:54.400 --> 0:06:56.760
<v Speaker 6>I'll create the value. You tell me how much value created?

0:06:56.800 --> 0:06:58.240
<v Speaker 5>By the way, if you don't want to pay me,

0:06:58.440 --> 0:07:00.240
<v Speaker 5>then I'll go to someone else who will. You can

0:07:00.320 --> 0:07:03.040
<v Speaker 5>just you can have different margins and the personal payment,

0:07:03.120 --> 0:07:04.159
<v Speaker 5>you can have a different.

0:07:03.839 --> 0:07:06.240
<v Speaker 6>Safety profile and the paper. You can have a different.

0:07:05.920 --> 0:07:08.800
<v Speaker 5>Ability to control your whole business from your laptop than

0:07:08.800 --> 0:07:10.880
<v Speaker 5>someone else because the person who valued it paid me.

0:07:11.000 --> 0:07:11.680
<v Speaker 6>We don't want to pay me.

0:07:11.720 --> 0:07:16.280
<v Speaker 3>Great Alex Carpcio Palenteer Technologies. This morning, the Bear Cave,

0:07:16.840 --> 0:07:20.760
<v Speaker 3>a subset based newsletter, put out a negative report into it.

0:07:22.120 --> 0:07:23.560
<v Speaker 4>Let me just read one of the claims.

0:07:23.600 --> 0:07:27.600
<v Speaker 3>The Bear Cave believes Palenteer is an ai imposta engaging

0:07:27.600 --> 0:07:31.760
<v Speaker 3>in spurious games to inflate its books and obfuscate its

0:07:31.840 --> 0:07:34.880
<v Speaker 3>less sexy role as an over height data consultant.

0:07:34.880 --> 0:07:36.000
<v Speaker 4>What is your response to that.

0:07:36.360 --> 0:07:38.480
<v Speaker 6>The bear Cave is a bear cave. They can stay

0:07:38.480 --> 0:07:40.760
<v Speaker 6>in the bear cave. We're a profitable software company.

0:07:40.880 --> 0:07:43.160
<v Speaker 5>Those are interesting critiques of us, and you know we

0:07:43.200 --> 0:07:44.960
<v Speaker 5>have the best products in the market and that's why

0:07:44.960 --> 0:07:46.320
<v Speaker 5>they're profitable and we will win.

0:07:47.520 --> 0:07:48.880
<v Speaker 4>Wanted to give you the right response.

0:07:49.120 --> 0:07:51.480
<v Speaker 3>That was all the core of Palente's pitch, right, is

0:07:51.520 --> 0:07:57.280
<v Speaker 3>that you have this experience in managing sensitive classified often

0:07:57.760 --> 0:08:02.040
<v Speaker 3>data networks or closed network How does that work in

0:08:02.120 --> 0:08:03.440
<v Speaker 3>the training of.

0:08:03.640 --> 0:08:05.440
<v Speaker 4>The l lms that are going into a I P.

0:08:06.120 --> 0:08:08.960
<v Speaker 3>Is it difficult when they have that kind of restriction

0:08:09.080 --> 0:08:09.920
<v Speaker 3>on the data source.

0:08:09.960 --> 0:08:14.640
<v Speaker 5>It's a very very very important technical question to work

0:08:15.120 --> 0:08:17.640
<v Speaker 5>to use l l ms at scale in a classified

0:08:17.680 --> 0:08:20.520
<v Speaker 5>in sensitive environment. You have to have something like a

0:08:20.600 --> 0:08:23.280
<v Speaker 5>data model that trains the data model, and something like

0:08:23.360 --> 0:08:27.600
<v Speaker 5>branching and and and and and access control. Those products

0:08:27.680 --> 0:08:28.640
<v Speaker 5>take decades to build.

0:08:28.720 --> 0:08:29.280
<v Speaker 6>We have them.

0:08:29.560 --> 0:08:32.800
<v Speaker 5>But if you have those products, you can segment in

0:08:32.880 --> 0:08:34.000
<v Speaker 5>real time what what.

0:08:34.000 --> 0:08:35.000
<v Speaker 4>The already built.

0:08:35.040 --> 0:08:35.800
<v Speaker 6>They're already built.

0:08:36.000 --> 0:08:37.840
<v Speaker 5>We're already they're already part of all of our core

0:08:37.920 --> 0:08:39.880
<v Speaker 5>fied they're part of PG, they're part of foundry.

0:08:40.160 --> 0:08:41.280
<v Speaker 6>This is they're.

0:08:41.080 --> 0:08:43.719
<v Speaker 5>About we roll them out to our current customers. Many

0:08:43.720 --> 0:08:46.120
<v Speaker 5>of our customers have not needed to use these, They

0:08:46.120 --> 0:08:46.800
<v Speaker 5>now need to use them.

0:08:46.840 --> 0:08:47.959
<v Speaker 6>Why do they need to use them?

0:08:48.040 --> 0:08:51.120
<v Speaker 5>Because if you in any environment, you're gonna have records

0:08:51.120 --> 0:08:53.000
<v Speaker 5>that you're gonna have, you're gonna have data and insights

0:08:53.040 --> 0:08:54.800
<v Speaker 5>you're not going to share. With the large language model,

0:08:54.840 --> 0:08:56.560
<v Speaker 5>you're gonna have data insights you do want to share,

0:08:56.679 --> 0:08:59.360
<v Speaker 5>and you're gonna have a hybrid and that requires a segmenting,

0:08:59.400 --> 0:09:02.120
<v Speaker 5>branching architecture. And one of the things we built over

0:09:02.120 --> 0:09:04.800
<v Speaker 5>the last ten years, randomly because we thought it would

0:09:04.800 --> 0:09:05.800
<v Speaker 5>be valuable someday.

0:09:05.640 --> 0:09:09.959
<v Speaker 3>Was that for our Bloomberg radio and television audiences worldwide.

0:09:10.000 --> 0:09:12.560
<v Speaker 3>We are with doctor Alex Karp, the CEO of Palenter.

0:09:12.600 --> 0:09:16.439
<v Speaker 3>An interesting case study is Ukraine. You've deepened your relationship

0:09:16.480 --> 0:09:19.960
<v Speaker 3>and activity in Ukraine using AI in one case to

0:09:20.000 --> 0:09:21.040
<v Speaker 3>help with reconstruction.

0:09:21.920 --> 0:09:23.400
<v Speaker 4>How else given just.

0:09:23.360 --> 0:09:28.040
<v Speaker 6>Well, by the way, my real answer to the short

0:09:28.080 --> 0:09:31.400
<v Speaker 6>people is ask the Russians what do you mean by this?

0:09:31.640 --> 0:09:34.640
<v Speaker 5>Like we can't say, ask the Ukrainians, Ask people who

0:09:34.679 --> 0:09:37.080
<v Speaker 5>are in the battlefield, ask people who have been subject.

0:09:37.160 --> 0:09:40.439
<v Speaker 5>You're talking about the effective effectiveness of our product. Okay,

0:09:40.520 --> 0:09:42.440
<v Speaker 5>So it's like there's very little we can say. You

0:09:42.480 --> 0:09:45.360
<v Speaker 5>can read what the Ukrainians are saying. They use targeting,

0:09:45.400 --> 0:09:48.400
<v Speaker 5>according to reports, has gone up given the use of

0:09:48.440 --> 0:09:53.240
<v Speaker 5>AI by products potentially ours from like by twenty to

0:09:53.280 --> 0:09:57.120
<v Speaker 5>fifty x. These products have changed the course of history

0:09:57.640 --> 0:09:58.640
<v Speaker 5>and they will continue to.

0:09:58.640 --> 0:10:00.800
<v Speaker 6>Can't change the course of history, and super proud of that.

0:10:01.320 --> 0:10:04.480
<v Speaker 3>Do we already have in the military use case, an

0:10:04.559 --> 0:10:08.760
<v Speaker 3>arms race between powers like the US, Russia, China specifically

0:10:08.840 --> 0:10:10.760
<v Speaker 3>in the field of artificial intelligence.

0:10:10.360 --> 0:10:11.880
<v Speaker 5>Yes, and we have an advantage and if we don't

0:10:11.920 --> 0:10:14.200
<v Speaker 5>get get out of our own way, we might actually

0:10:14.200 --> 0:10:14.679
<v Speaker 5>continue to.

0:10:14.679 --> 0:10:16.160
<v Speaker 4>When you say we gets out of our own way,

0:10:16.160 --> 0:10:16.880
<v Speaker 4>what do you mean by that?

0:10:16.960 --> 0:10:19.480
<v Speaker 5>Well, you know in America has the best best software

0:10:19.480 --> 0:10:22.160
<v Speaker 5>companies in the world. The software companies largely come from

0:10:22.160 --> 0:10:25.120
<v Speaker 5>a sliver of America. They produce products. We need to

0:10:25.120 --> 0:10:27.760
<v Speaker 5>get to a point where one percent of our spend

0:10:27.800 --> 0:10:30.200
<v Speaker 5>on defense goes to products that have been proven on

0:10:30.280 --> 0:10:33.800
<v Speaker 5>the battlefield, not power points. And so like in the

0:10:33.840 --> 0:10:37.360
<v Speaker 5>large language model and the generalizable AI. We are far ahead,

0:10:38.320 --> 0:10:41.240
<v Speaker 5>call it a year or two, but we must actually implant.

0:10:41.280 --> 0:10:43.320
<v Speaker 5>And there's a huge debate. Part of the debate, of course,

0:10:43.400 --> 0:10:45.120
<v Speaker 5>is these things are very dangerous. If we didn't have

0:10:45.920 --> 0:10:48.720
<v Speaker 5>vicious adversaries, we should we should slow it down, but

0:10:48.760 --> 0:10:50.640
<v Speaker 5>we do. But we also have lots of people who

0:10:50.679 --> 0:10:52.440
<v Speaker 5>don't want to roll this out because they have nothing

0:10:52.480 --> 0:10:55.400
<v Speaker 5>to roll out, and so there's like the debate machine

0:10:55.400 --> 0:10:58.160
<v Speaker 5>about rolling this out. Is partly for legitimate reasons because

0:10:58.559 --> 0:11:01.240
<v Speaker 5>this could be dangerous, partly for security reasons you brought up.

0:11:01.280 --> 0:11:03.120
<v Speaker 5>But there are architectures that will allow you to deal

0:11:03.120 --> 0:11:06.520
<v Speaker 5>with this as a product like Pounder and hopefully someday others.

0:11:06.920 --> 0:11:09.600
<v Speaker 5>But there's also the debate machine because there are only

0:11:09.600 --> 0:11:11.680
<v Speaker 5>three or four companies in the world with anything to sell,

0:11:11.760 --> 0:11:14.319
<v Speaker 5>and everyone else wants to debate why should we do this,

0:11:14.320 --> 0:11:15.160
<v Speaker 5>how should we do this.

0:11:15.280 --> 0:11:17.040
<v Speaker 6>Can we play catch up? Can we talk about this

0:11:17.080 --> 0:11:17.800
<v Speaker 6>in five years?

0:11:18.040 --> 0:11:20.800
<v Speaker 5>That really plays into our adversary's hands, and we really

0:11:20.880 --> 0:11:21.520
<v Speaker 5>have to avoid that.

0:11:21.720 --> 0:11:24.800
<v Speaker 3>The long term concern that came up twenty four hours

0:11:24.800 --> 0:11:27.400
<v Speaker 3>ago or forty hours ago is an existential threat from

0:11:27.400 --> 0:11:30.720
<v Speaker 3>a you talk at panting about bending AI to a

0:11:30.720 --> 0:11:34.199
<v Speaker 3>collective will, Well, do you share the concern though about

0:11:34.200 --> 0:11:35.280
<v Speaker 3>an extinction level?

0:11:35.520 --> 0:11:39.640
<v Speaker 5>Well, there's a lot going on. There are these things dangerous.

0:11:39.640 --> 0:11:43.360
<v Speaker 5>Could they become potentially dangerous? Could they become Yes? But

0:11:43.880 --> 0:11:47.320
<v Speaker 5>what these debates ignore is either we will wield them

0:11:47.480 --> 0:11:50.280
<v Speaker 5>or our adversaries will will them. It is much better

0:11:50.320 --> 0:11:52.920
<v Speaker 5>if we wield the technology than our adversaries who do

0:11:53.000 --> 0:11:55.400
<v Speaker 5>not respect our norms, do not respect the rule of law,

0:11:55.440 --> 0:11:57.360
<v Speaker 5>and do not respect the way we want to live

0:11:57.360 --> 0:11:58.080
<v Speaker 5>in freedom.

0:11:58.520 --> 0:12:00.520
<v Speaker 6>So that's point one. Point two.

0:12:00.920 --> 0:12:03.400
<v Speaker 5>In the near term, what penalteer will allow you to

0:12:03.400 --> 0:12:06.400
<v Speaker 5>do is make these things really, really valuable commercially and

0:12:06.440 --> 0:12:09.720
<v Speaker 5>in the military context. And we in commercial context, you

0:12:09.760 --> 0:12:11.560
<v Speaker 5>have to do it because if you don't buy our product,

0:12:11.559 --> 0:12:14.800
<v Speaker 5>your competition will. In the military context, we have to

0:12:14.800 --> 0:12:17.040
<v Speaker 5>do it because our adversaries will build those products.

0:12:17.280 --> 0:12:19.640
<v Speaker 3>You toys about the competitive landscape. I actually wanted to

0:12:19.679 --> 0:12:22.760
<v Speaker 3>ask you about C three AI as an example, because

0:12:22.760 --> 0:12:25.280
<v Speaker 3>you come up in bidding processes with them.

0:12:25.600 --> 0:12:28.720
<v Speaker 5>Actually we look, this is a massive market. We actually

0:12:28.720 --> 0:12:30.920
<v Speaker 5>don't come up with bidding processes anyway. And I'll tell

0:12:30.920 --> 0:12:32.000
<v Speaker 5>you what I think about everyone.

0:12:32.040 --> 0:12:33.480
<v Speaker 4>See, you don't have any competition.

0:12:33.559 --> 0:12:35.080
<v Speaker 5>Let me just let me just tell you about this

0:12:35.200 --> 0:12:39.080
<v Speaker 5>competition thing that while street analysts love, it's complete ps you.

0:12:39.320 --> 0:12:43.079
<v Speaker 5>This is an infinite market. Basically, try what we're doing,

0:12:43.160 --> 0:12:45.320
<v Speaker 5>and try what everyone else is doing, and buy the

0:12:45.360 --> 0:12:46.480
<v Speaker 5>thing that creates the most.

0:12:46.320 --> 0:12:49.120
<v Speaker 3>Value on an infinite market. Blom Bag Intelligence put out

0:12:49.120 --> 0:12:52.240
<v Speaker 3>this research report this morning that says generative AI as

0:12:52.280 --> 0:12:54.720
<v Speaker 3>a market will be one point three trillion in twenty

0:12:54.760 --> 0:12:58.280
<v Speaker 3>to thirty two. That requires compound annual growth of about

0:12:58.280 --> 0:13:00.960
<v Speaker 3>forty percent a year from this point over a decade.

0:13:01.440 --> 0:13:03.200
<v Speaker 3>Do you see that as really well, what I see,

0:13:03.400 --> 0:13:03.920
<v Speaker 3>I don't know.

0:13:03.880 --> 0:13:05.320
<v Speaker 4>This based on the markets you operate.

0:13:05.520 --> 0:13:07.439
<v Speaker 6>Look, these experts just make stuff up.

0:13:07.480 --> 0:13:09.840
<v Speaker 5>But you know, what we know is this is a large,

0:13:10.360 --> 0:13:12.400
<v Speaker 5>basically impossible to measure market.

0:13:13.440 --> 0:13:14.719
<v Speaker 6>And what we also know.

0:13:14.800 --> 0:13:17.440
<v Speaker 5>Is everybody in the in the US is going to

0:13:17.480 --> 0:13:20.280
<v Speaker 5>find ways to become more efficient and better using software,

0:13:20.360 --> 0:13:21.720
<v Speaker 5>and a lot of that software is going to be

0:13:21.720 --> 0:13:22.400
<v Speaker 5>AI driven.

0:13:22.640 --> 0:13:23.679
<v Speaker 6>We also know they're.

0:13:23.480 --> 0:13:26.120
<v Speaker 5>Going to the market over time, not in a quarter,

0:13:26.480 --> 0:13:28.600
<v Speaker 5>will end up picking the best products.

0:13:28.760 --> 0:13:29.319
<v Speaker 6>That's all we know.

0:13:30.440 --> 0:13:33.560
<v Speaker 3>In the United Kingdom, my home country, the ft is

0:13:33.600 --> 0:13:36.719
<v Speaker 3>reporting that within the NHS as a case study, there

0:13:36.760 --> 0:13:40.040
<v Speaker 3>is some concern about deepening the data relationship with palenteer.

0:13:41.000 --> 0:13:44.400
<v Speaker 3>What would be your answer to those concerns?

0:13:45.040 --> 0:13:47.800
<v Speaker 5>Look outside of America and in the UK, there are

0:13:48.160 --> 0:13:50.720
<v Speaker 5>legitimate questions that get asked, where's the data going to go?

0:13:51.000 --> 0:13:52.959
<v Speaker 5>How is it moved too touches it? Does it get

0:13:52.960 --> 0:13:56.440
<v Speaker 5>exported to the US? Can we verify how is used,

0:13:56.720 --> 0:13:59.839
<v Speaker 5>what context? And can we make sure that the underprivileged

0:13:59.880 --> 0:14:03.160
<v Speaker 5>p people of the UK actually get the same treatment

0:14:03.200 --> 0:14:06.200
<v Speaker 5>as the privileged people, including not just in treatment but

0:14:06.280 --> 0:14:08.400
<v Speaker 5>future treatment which is a huge issue in the UK

0:14:08.720 --> 0:14:10.360
<v Speaker 5>because there's a backlog, So how do you deal with

0:14:10.360 --> 0:14:16.360
<v Speaker 5>the backlog equitably? Talentaer provides the most robust transparent software

0:14:16.360 --> 0:14:18.280
<v Speaker 5>in the world, which is part of the reason we're

0:14:18.320 --> 0:14:22.120
<v Speaker 5>having an AI bonanza because to make AI work you

0:14:22.240 --> 0:14:24.480
<v Speaker 5>have to show how it works. How did the transform work,

0:14:24.520 --> 0:14:26.920
<v Speaker 5>how does the branching work, how does the ontology work.

0:14:26.960 --> 0:14:28.400
<v Speaker 6>How does it map to on This.

0:14:28.440 --> 0:14:31.160
<v Speaker 5>Is exactly what you have to show in a hospital context.

0:14:31.320 --> 0:14:34.800
<v Speaker 5>Who worked with the patient, under what condition, what doctor

0:14:35.160 --> 0:14:37.280
<v Speaker 5>was it was the person equitably and fairly treated.

0:14:37.480 --> 0:14:40.360
<v Speaker 6>What happens to backlog by the way, we've proven we

0:14:40.400 --> 0:14:41.200
<v Speaker 6>can do this as a.

0:14:41.160 --> 0:14:45.160
<v Speaker 5>Product safely, efficiently and under the hardest conditions in the UK,

0:14:45.560 --> 0:14:47.640
<v Speaker 5>and I really hope we win that for this for

0:14:47.720 --> 0:14:50.480
<v Speaker 5>our sake, but also for the sake of our UK

0:14:50.560 --> 0:14:53.600
<v Speaker 5>employees and others that we greatly respect, and because it'll

0:14:53.680 --> 0:14:57.560
<v Speaker 5>lead transparency leads to the fairest, most ethical and justified

0:14:58.560 --> 0:14:59.560
<v Speaker 5>outcomes you can get.

0:15:00.120 --> 0:15:02.440
<v Speaker 3>Is Alix carp CEO of Palented, thank you for having

0:15:02.520 --> 0:15:04.320
<v Speaker 3>us at AIP can't hear in palawawle.

0:15:04.400 --> 0:15:07.280
<v Speaker 4>Thank you back to you, Take care.

0:15:07.600 --> 0:15:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Ed, absolutely fascinating conversation and AI bonanza. We're going to

0:15:13.160 --> 0:15:16.520
<v Speaker 1>deep dive into all things artificial intelligence throughout the show.

0:15:16.520 --> 0:15:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Coming up, we break down the earnings of C three AI.

0:15:19.160 --> 0:15:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Apparently the market is infinite. Well, why is Dan i'ves

0:15:22.920 --> 0:15:24.320
<v Speaker 1>gone outperformed this stock?

0:15:24.440 --> 0:15:26.160
<v Speaker 2>Is that why he's from Webush of course.

0:15:26.120 --> 0:15:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Get his thoughts as well as what's happening in the

0:15:27.920 --> 0:15:30.760
<v Speaker 1>future for Apple, and it's a our path, it's a Bloomberg.

0:15:42.400 --> 0:15:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Let's get back to some of these earnings, the earnings

0:15:44.160 --> 0:15:47.560
<v Speaker 1>reactions because Salesforce tumbling after the software company signaled it

0:15:47.600 --> 0:15:50.080
<v Speaker 1>isn't growing as fast as well it used to, while

0:15:50.120 --> 0:15:53.720
<v Speaker 1>of course shifting its focus to generating higher profits. Let's

0:15:53.760 --> 0:15:56.200
<v Speaker 1>get into the risk reward here with Bloomberg's Brodie Ford,

0:15:56.240 --> 0:15:58.480
<v Speaker 1>and it was a notable drop. We'm now studying a

0:15:58.520 --> 0:16:01.120
<v Speaker 1>little bit, but ultimately this is a company that's having

0:16:01.120 --> 0:16:05.520
<v Speaker 1>to do layoffs, having to tighten its overall expenses. Why

0:16:05.600 --> 0:16:06.720
<v Speaker 1>the sales slow down there?

0:16:07.280 --> 0:16:10.200
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, so last quarter Salesforce said we're going to focus

0:16:10.200 --> 0:16:13.040
<v Speaker 8>on profit now, and the market said, yeah, finally, like

0:16:13.080 --> 0:16:15.680
<v Speaker 8>we know, we couldn't be more excited, and this quarner

0:16:15.680 --> 0:16:17.640
<v Speaker 8>that gave us more of that. But then the market

0:16:17.720 --> 0:16:20.680
<v Speaker 8>started saying, oh, wait a second, but we you guys

0:16:20.680 --> 0:16:22.120
<v Speaker 8>are a growth company and we want to make sure

0:16:22.120 --> 0:16:24.600
<v Speaker 8>we keep seeing further revenue growth. And so it's one

0:16:24.600 --> 0:16:27.920
<v Speaker 8>of those funny situations where really almost all the metrics

0:16:27.920 --> 0:16:30.720
<v Speaker 8>who are beat or at least a meat, but just

0:16:30.760 --> 0:16:34.120
<v Speaker 8>a slight deceleration and sales has people saying, oh, man,

0:16:34.160 --> 0:16:36.320
<v Speaker 8>are these cost cuts going to weigh on their ability

0:16:36.360 --> 0:16:38.200
<v Speaker 8>to really keep growing in the way they have been

0:16:38.240 --> 0:16:39.440
<v Speaker 8>over the last decade.

0:16:39.600 --> 0:16:42.320
<v Speaker 1>And it's a similar theme that perhaps we saw with

0:16:42.400 --> 0:16:44.760
<v Speaker 1>C three AI as well, is that a company that

0:16:44.960 --> 0:16:48.400
<v Speaker 1>has significant growth well Salesforce at the best performing stock

0:16:48.400 --> 0:16:49.760
<v Speaker 1>in the s and P five hundred this year, C

0:16:49.880 --> 0:16:53.560
<v Speaker 1>three AI is tripled in its market valuation, and yet

0:16:53.640 --> 0:16:55.359
<v Speaker 1>the growth that they're guiding.

0:16:54.960 --> 0:16:56.560
<v Speaker 2>To just do isn't living up to expectation.

0:16:56.960 --> 0:16:57.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, when it.

0:16:57.480 --> 0:16:59.840
<v Speaker 8>Comes to C three, So if salesforce is one of

0:16:59.880 --> 0:17:02.960
<v Speaker 8>the best in the SMP, C three is the best

0:17:03.000 --> 0:17:05.880
<v Speaker 8>tech stock performance. I mean, it's up three hundred percent, right.

0:17:05.880 --> 0:17:09.240
<v Speaker 8>There's been so much hype, and the big question is

0:17:09.240 --> 0:17:09.920
<v Speaker 8>is it just hype?

0:17:10.080 --> 0:17:10.280
<v Speaker 9>Right?

0:17:10.560 --> 0:17:14.600
<v Speaker 8>Is it have a real robust AI ability to grow

0:17:15.080 --> 0:17:17.399
<v Speaker 8>or are people just buying the ticker because it says AI,

0:17:17.680 --> 0:17:20.119
<v Speaker 8>you know. And so when it rallied three hundred percent

0:17:20.160 --> 0:17:23.840
<v Speaker 8>this year, a lot of people say this looks about like,

0:17:23.920 --> 0:17:26.760
<v Speaker 8>you know, Game Stop in twenty twenty one or something. Yeah,

0:17:26.800 --> 0:17:29.359
<v Speaker 8>So I think when the figures last night came in

0:17:29.400 --> 0:17:32.880
<v Speaker 8>even a little bit light, people kind of panicked and said, oh, man,

0:17:33.160 --> 0:17:35.880
<v Speaker 8>is this hype? Are we getting a pull down the string, you.

0:17:35.840 --> 0:17:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Know, Yeah, and you're someone who's perhaps been laying there.

0:17:40.160 --> 0:17:42.199
<v Speaker 1>Some of the arguments as to why it's hype some

0:17:42.280 --> 0:17:44.000
<v Speaker 1>great writing coming from Bradie forty Gunn.

0:17:44.119 --> 0:17:45.120
<v Speaker 2>Check out his reporting.

0:17:45.200 --> 0:17:46.680
<v Speaker 1>We thank him for bringing us up to speed on

0:17:46.680 --> 0:17:49.240
<v Speaker 1>the latest on C three AI. But one person still

0:17:49.320 --> 0:17:52.000
<v Speaker 1>likes the hype around the stock that i'ves In fact

0:17:52.000 --> 0:17:55.280
<v Speaker 1>from Webush senior equity analyst, you rose to an outperform

0:17:55.400 --> 0:17:57.159
<v Speaker 1>rating and a fifty dollars.

0:17:56.880 --> 0:17:58.000
<v Speaker 2>Price target on the stock.

0:17:58.080 --> 0:18:01.359
<v Speaker 1>Right, So talk to me about why how are you

0:18:01.440 --> 0:18:04.200
<v Speaker 1>seeing this company capitalize on artificial intelligence?

0:18:05.680 --> 0:18:07.679
<v Speaker 10>In my opinion, I mean they're going through a model

0:18:07.760 --> 0:18:11.200
<v Speaker 10>transition on the consumption side and on the other side,

0:18:11.600 --> 0:18:13.800
<v Speaker 10>they're on their way to what's going to be five

0:18:13.880 --> 0:18:18.000
<v Speaker 10>hundred million of rev and going because this is an

0:18:18.000 --> 0:18:20.760
<v Speaker 10>eight hundred billion dollar market opportunity in terms of AI.

0:18:21.160 --> 0:18:23.960
<v Speaker 10>And when you look at how Seebull's position is despite

0:18:24.000 --> 0:18:27.920
<v Speaker 10>all the controversies, I think from a platform perspective, they're

0:18:27.960 --> 0:18:31.800
<v Speaker 10>just going use case by use case, continuing to increase

0:18:31.800 --> 0:18:32.520
<v Speaker 10>their tentacles.

0:18:32.520 --> 0:18:33.120
<v Speaker 11>And I think the.

0:18:33.080 --> 0:18:36.199
<v Speaker 10>Stock relative to where it could ultimately lead, you know,

0:18:36.280 --> 0:18:38.359
<v Speaker 10>will we be buyers here in this dip, which is

0:18:38.359 --> 0:18:39.359
<v Speaker 10>why we upgrade.

0:18:39.520 --> 0:18:43.040
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting that Alex Kart from Palenteer just hearing saying

0:18:43.040 --> 0:18:45.720
<v Speaker 1>this isn't an infinite market. But I am going to

0:18:45.760 --> 0:18:48.879
<v Speaker 1>ask the competition question anyway, because that is some of

0:18:48.920 --> 0:18:51.200
<v Speaker 1>the worry here. The worry that they're very focused on

0:18:51.440 --> 0:18:54.560
<v Speaker 1>perhaps offering their services to energy companies, they haven't really

0:18:54.600 --> 0:18:58.240
<v Speaker 1>diversified out of that that successfully thus far, and BlueBag Intelligence.

0:18:58.240 --> 0:19:01.040
<v Speaker 1>They're kind of worried about large application software platforms. They're

0:19:01.040 --> 0:19:03.439
<v Speaker 1>worried about other cloud vendors getting in on the space.

0:19:04.560 --> 0:19:06.359
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, and look, no doubt, I mean this is a

0:19:06.400 --> 0:19:08.920
<v Speaker 10>game of Thrones playing out in AI. You know, as

0:19:08.960 --> 0:19:11.760
<v Speaker 10>Alex talked about Pound Tier being one of the core

0:19:11.800 --> 0:19:14.840
<v Speaker 10>AI players. You look at what we've seen from Microsoft

0:19:14.880 --> 0:19:17.159
<v Speaker 10>in the video. That's really the start of it. But

0:19:17.200 --> 0:19:20.240
<v Speaker 10>in terms of second third derivative, there's gonna be many

0:19:20.280 --> 0:19:22.960
<v Speaker 10>winners here. And when I look at C three in

0:19:23.040 --> 0:19:25.960
<v Speaker 10>terms of what they built, I think it just speaks

0:19:26.000 --> 0:19:28.480
<v Speaker 10>to there's gonna be many companies that even though right

0:19:28.520 --> 0:19:30.919
<v Speaker 10>now you're not seeing it from a revenue perspective, in

0:19:31.000 --> 0:19:33.920
<v Speaker 10>terms of how they got it, I think three four

0:19:34.000 --> 0:19:36.040
<v Speaker 10>quarters from that, we look back at this is more

0:19:36.080 --> 0:19:39.240
<v Speaker 10>of an inflection point rather than the start of some

0:19:39.280 --> 0:19:39.920
<v Speaker 10>sort of frad.

0:19:40.800 --> 0:19:44.639
<v Speaker 1>It is heavily shorted, and there have been some notes

0:19:44.680 --> 0:19:48.120
<v Speaker 1>coming from short sellers on the stock worried about overpromising

0:19:48.240 --> 0:19:52.800
<v Speaker 1>under delivering. You hinted at the controversy there. What makes

0:19:52.880 --> 0:19:54.960
<v Speaker 1>you confident in the leadership of this business.

0:19:56.040 --> 0:19:58.160
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, Look, and obviously the shorts have done a ton

0:19:58.200 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 10>of work. I mean, if you look at the bears,

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:02.280
<v Speaker 10>they spend a lot of time in the story. But

0:20:02.320 --> 0:20:04.199
<v Speaker 10>that's the sense of what makes the market right. In

0:20:04.240 --> 0:20:07.800
<v Speaker 10>other words, it comes down to can they execute? And

0:20:07.880 --> 0:20:11.800
<v Speaker 10>I believe in terms of the relationships with hyperscale players

0:20:12.280 --> 0:20:14.920
<v Speaker 10>within the Beltway, and you look with Sebele.

0:20:14.680 --> 0:20:15.400
<v Speaker 11>Sort of built here.

0:20:15.440 --> 0:20:17.440
<v Speaker 10>Look, if I could go back five six years ago,

0:20:17.840 --> 0:20:20.439
<v Speaker 10>many thought that, you know, that this was something that

0:20:20.520 --> 0:20:23.000
<v Speaker 10>was never going to come to fruition when they were private,

0:20:23.080 --> 0:20:24.640
<v Speaker 10>and you look at how they built it.

0:20:25.320 --> 0:20:28.200
<v Speaker 11>I think they're going through a transition on the consumption model.

0:20:28.240 --> 0:20:31.280
<v Speaker 11>And now next three to four quarters it's an execution story.

0:20:31.320 --> 0:20:35.120
<v Speaker 10>We're betting that it's going to be positive execution, and

0:20:35.160 --> 0:20:35.879
<v Speaker 10>that's why you.

0:20:35.880 --> 0:20:38.480
<v Speaker 11>Know, ultimately, I think this is a situation that you're seeing.

0:20:38.240 --> 0:20:42.000
<v Speaker 10>Across AI because I believe it's a revolution in terms

0:20:42.040 --> 0:20:42.520
<v Speaker 10>of this is.

0:20:42.480 --> 0:20:44.920
<v Speaker 11>Not a hype theme in my opinion, in terms of

0:20:44.960 --> 0:20:45.600
<v Speaker 11>broader AI.

0:20:45.960 --> 0:20:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Okay, we've got one minute, Dan, Broader AI and Apple.

0:20:49.160 --> 0:20:50.800
<v Speaker 1>You're expecting much on Monday.

0:20:51.760 --> 0:20:55.040
<v Speaker 11>Oh, I think you from Cooper Tino clearly, you.

0:20:55.000 --> 0:20:57.680
<v Speaker 10>Know, as Germans talked about an ar VR that will

0:20:57.720 --> 0:21:00.760
<v Speaker 10>be front and center. AI will be a theme and

0:21:00.800 --> 0:21:04.200
<v Speaker 10>the keynote from Cook. We believe it's about the developers.

0:21:04.520 --> 0:21:08.080
<v Speaker 10>There's a battle right now. Battle feel from developers from Google,

0:21:08.160 --> 0:21:11.879
<v Speaker 10>Microsoft and Apple. You know, I view that as a

0:21:11.960 --> 0:21:14.600
<v Speaker 10>key opportunity for them to go out there in terms

0:21:14.600 --> 0:21:17.919
<v Speaker 10>of building AI on the app Store and really the

0:21:17.960 --> 0:21:20.280
<v Speaker 10>start of what's going to be a multi year and

0:21:20.320 --> 0:21:25.000
<v Speaker 10>I think massive growth opportunity that's being underestimated within Kuper.

0:21:24.800 --> 0:21:28.159
<v Speaker 1>Tina, Dana ie a web Bush, thanks for all the thoughts.

0:21:28.160 --> 0:21:29.000
<v Speaker 2>Great to have you on some.

0:21:28.960 --> 0:21:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Of these earnings and these movers. Welcome back to Blue

0:21:39.000 --> 0:21:41.040
<v Speaker 1>Bow Technology. I'm Caroline Hide in New York. Let's talk

0:21:41.080 --> 0:21:43.600
<v Speaker 1>about really the AI hype that we continue to live

0:21:43.640 --> 0:21:46.480
<v Speaker 1>and die by. At the moment, the finance industry moving quickly.

0:21:46.560 --> 0:21:50.480
<v Speaker 1>We understand to use artificial intelligence in productive and innovative ways,

0:21:50.520 --> 0:21:53.240
<v Speaker 1>but there are still times when it makes more sense.

0:21:53.400 --> 0:21:57.320
<v Speaker 2>To actually use human brain power. It makes a Shagani reports.

0:21:57.800 --> 0:22:01.000
<v Speaker 12>Time because some real talk about AI. Not only is

0:22:01.040 --> 0:22:04.560
<v Speaker 12>it sometimes worse than humans, it can also be more expensive.

0:22:04.840 --> 0:22:09.320
<v Speaker 9>It costs GPT four around fourteen dollars to answer one

0:22:09.400 --> 0:22:14.359
<v Speaker 9>question on one one hundred thousand word loan document. An

0:22:14.400 --> 0:22:17.760
<v Speaker 9>example of a question might be what are the downgrade.

0:22:17.240 --> 0:22:18.360
<v Speaker 4>Triggers for this loan?

0:22:18.800 --> 0:22:21.479
<v Speaker 9>And the reason why it costs fourteen dollars are simply

0:22:21.560 --> 0:22:25.800
<v Speaker 9>down to the extreme compute costs required for open AI

0:22:26.119 --> 0:22:29.040
<v Speaker 9>to operate its large language models, so it passes that

0:22:29.080 --> 0:22:32.440
<v Speaker 9>compute costs onto the software vendor or onto the user.

0:22:32.560 --> 0:22:35.280
<v Speaker 9>At the same time, it only costs around six to

0:22:35.280 --> 0:22:39.600
<v Speaker 9>seven dollars for a human being just opening up Adobe

0:22:39.600 --> 0:22:43.399
<v Speaker 9>Acrobat and Microsoft Exel to answer that specific question.

0:22:43.640 --> 0:22:47.840
<v Speaker 12>News company sells data and answers technology to financial institutions.

0:22:48.240 --> 0:22:50.680
<v Speaker 12>It's an industry that is rapidly adopting AI.

0:22:51.040 --> 0:22:53.760
<v Speaker 9>Banks need to be far more strategic in their way

0:22:53.800 --> 0:22:57.120
<v Speaker 9>of leveraging AI, both from a cost perspective and from

0:22:57.160 --> 0:22:58.280
<v Speaker 9>a risk management.

0:22:57.960 --> 0:23:02.800
<v Speaker 12>Perspective, so well is using large language models to analyze

0:23:02.840 --> 0:23:07.560
<v Speaker 12>regulatory data to make recommendations to clients. France's BNP Powabus

0:23:07.600 --> 0:23:11.240
<v Speaker 12>meanwhile uses AI powered chatbots for customer service as well

0:23:11.280 --> 0:23:11.920
<v Speaker 12>as using the.

0:23:11.880 --> 0:23:13.240
<v Speaker 2>Tech in fraud detection.

0:23:13.480 --> 0:23:16.240
<v Speaker 12>And JP Morgan, the biggest US bank, is on a

0:23:16.320 --> 0:23:19.680
<v Speaker 12>hiring spree. It advertised for a massive three and a

0:23:19.760 --> 0:23:23.760
<v Speaker 12>half thousand AI related roles in the three months through Eppril.

0:23:24.000 --> 0:23:26.520
<v Speaker 12>These are some of the early applications at a time

0:23:26.560 --> 0:23:31.080
<v Speaker 12>when costs remain relatively high that's likely to change. Knowing

0:23:31.119 --> 0:23:34.960
<v Speaker 12>the technology's current limits also lets companies focus on the

0:23:35.040 --> 0:23:37.680
<v Speaker 12>real opportunities.

0:23:38.880 --> 0:23:39.680
<v Speaker 2>We just heard it there.

0:23:39.760 --> 0:23:42.560
<v Speaker 1>JP Morgan absolutely leading the pack when it comes to

0:23:42.640 --> 0:23:46.159
<v Speaker 1>experimentation or indeed hiring of AI talent. We want to

0:23:46.160 --> 0:23:48.639
<v Speaker 1>dig into this in Bloomberg Sally Bakewell, who covers all

0:23:48.680 --> 0:23:52.560
<v Speaker 1>things wall Stream, and just remind us why for banks

0:23:52.560 --> 0:23:55.520
<v Speaker 1>at the moment generator AI, AI in general is going

0:23:55.560 --> 0:23:56.520
<v Speaker 1>to be such a winner for them.

0:23:56.800 --> 0:23:59.880
<v Speaker 13>So yes, Wall Street is racing to use AI basically

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:02.840
<v Speaker 13>ways that make money, that saves money, and that prevents

0:24:02.920 --> 0:24:03.879
<v Speaker 13>nefarious money.

0:24:04.040 --> 0:24:05.680
<v Speaker 2>Now why is AI useful to banks?

0:24:05.720 --> 0:24:09.040
<v Speaker 13>Well, banks are these complex machines of reams of data,

0:24:09.080 --> 0:24:14.480
<v Speaker 13>of risk modeling of decisions underpinned by vast quantities of information,

0:24:14.880 --> 0:24:17.800
<v Speaker 13>and so if AI can make that more efficient or

0:24:17.840 --> 0:24:21.040
<v Speaker 13>cut some of the manpower involved, that is a huge

0:24:21.080 --> 0:24:22.119
<v Speaker 13>win for Wall Street.

0:24:22.400 --> 0:24:23.480
<v Speaker 2>Now what is it doing?

0:24:23.840 --> 0:24:28.080
<v Speaker 13>As we just heard banks like Deutsche banker deploying deeper

0:24:28.160 --> 0:24:31.280
<v Speaker 13>learning so that they can help clients analyze whether they

0:24:31.280 --> 0:24:34.520
<v Speaker 13>are too heavily invested in a particular asset. JP Morgan

0:24:34.560 --> 0:24:37.600
<v Speaker 13>has filed a patent for some sort of chat GPT

0:24:37.760 --> 0:24:42.160
<v Speaker 13>device that might help investors select equities and BNP paribad Well,

0:24:42.160 --> 0:24:44.880
<v Speaker 13>it's using chatbots to answer client questions.

0:24:44.880 --> 0:24:47.320
<v Speaker 1>Interesting, so that's sort of a serving to the customer.

0:24:47.480 --> 0:24:50.480
<v Speaker 1>Very much clear how that would work. I'm interested in

0:24:50.520 --> 0:24:53.520
<v Speaker 1>some of the risk analysis they're doing around this as well, because.

0:24:53.280 --> 0:24:54.320
<v Speaker 2>Some are being more cautious than another.

0:24:54.400 --> 0:24:56.280
<v Speaker 1>Does it feels like Morgan Stanley's having a bit more

0:24:56.280 --> 0:24:59.880
<v Speaker 1>of an experimental just within the confines Therefore, Walls take

0:25:00.880 --> 0:25:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Some had actually banned the use of CHATCHBT by their

0:25:03.000 --> 0:25:06.000
<v Speaker 1>own employees. So how do you see they're putting in

0:25:06.040 --> 0:25:08.480
<v Speaker 1>place the right guardrails.

0:25:08.040 --> 0:25:11.200
<v Speaker 13>Exactly, And we've seen some blow ups in the world

0:25:11.200 --> 0:25:13.880
<v Speaker 13>of advanced technology. Is you know, crypto and blockchain, those

0:25:13.880 --> 0:25:16.840
<v Speaker 13>have been hugely problematic, and so banks are indeed being

0:25:16.920 --> 0:25:19.520
<v Speaker 13>very very cautious. And we have heard from you know,

0:25:19.600 --> 0:25:22.720
<v Speaker 13>Warren Buffett who has said that you once it's out there,

0:25:22.760 --> 0:25:24.879
<v Speaker 13>you can't uninvent it, and so you know, the genie

0:25:24.880 --> 0:25:26.919
<v Speaker 13>out the bottle could propose a bit of a problem.

0:25:26.920 --> 0:25:29.840
<v Speaker 13>And Moynihan too has said Bank of America Chief Executive

0:25:29.840 --> 0:25:32.600
<v Speaker 13>Moynihan has also said that you know, you don't know

0:25:32.680 --> 0:25:33.480
<v Speaker 13>what are going.

0:25:33.280 --> 0:25:34.560
<v Speaker 2>Into a lot of these decisions.

0:25:34.600 --> 0:25:37.080
<v Speaker 13>If you don't know the inputs, you should potentially be

0:25:37.160 --> 0:25:39.679
<v Speaker 13>concerned about the outputs. And then, of course, you know,

0:25:39.720 --> 0:25:44.040
<v Speaker 13>banks have a fiduciary duty not to trade on unreliable information,

0:25:44.640 --> 0:25:47.040
<v Speaker 13>which also begs the question of the sources of data

0:25:47.040 --> 0:25:48.800
<v Speaker 13>that are pulled in when it.

0:25:48.760 --> 0:25:49.359
<v Speaker 2>Comes to AI.

0:25:50.040 --> 0:25:53.439
<v Speaker 1>How much are they building themselves or how much are

0:25:53.480 --> 0:25:54.360
<v Speaker 1>they doing plugins?

0:25:54.400 --> 0:25:55.440
<v Speaker 2>Do you know how much they're.

0:25:55.280 --> 0:25:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Looking to other AI tech outside of their world.

0:25:58.800 --> 0:26:01.760
<v Speaker 13>I think they are doing any and all. Some are

0:26:01.960 --> 0:26:03.800
<v Speaker 13>tried to do it in house and some are using

0:26:03.840 --> 0:26:07.359
<v Speaker 13>external consultancies. And you know, we had that great data

0:26:07.400 --> 0:26:10.720
<v Speaker 13>point about talent, because talent is very much at the

0:26:10.760 --> 0:26:13.560
<v Speaker 13>heart of this and of all the banks that are

0:26:13.560 --> 0:26:18.399
<v Speaker 13>really embracing AI. About forty percent of their open jobs

0:26:18.520 --> 0:26:22.520
<v Speaker 13>are AI related. That's for quants, that's for ethics or

0:26:22.560 --> 0:26:26.280
<v Speaker 13>governance or analysts and so and JP Morgan is very

0:26:26.359 --> 0:26:28.560
<v Speaker 13>much at the forefront of that, accounting for more than

0:26:28.560 --> 0:26:31.520
<v Speaker 13>three thousand, six hundred of those jobs. So very much

0:26:31.520 --> 0:26:34.000
<v Speaker 13>at the heart of this race is, as always on Wall.

0:26:33.840 --> 0:26:37.119
<v Speaker 1>Street, the battle for talent, and that talent's expensive as well.

0:26:37.240 --> 0:26:39.399
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's not bad timing that a lot of

0:26:39.400 --> 0:26:41.320
<v Speaker 1>the big tech companies have been letting go of some

0:26:41.440 --> 0:26:43.280
<v Speaker 1>key talent, and I'm sure they'll be sucked up into

0:26:43.280 --> 0:26:45.480
<v Speaker 1>the world of finance. But is there any reskilling that

0:26:45.560 --> 0:26:47.399
<v Speaker 1>goes on within the banks or is it always just

0:26:47.440 --> 0:26:48.560
<v Speaker 1>looking out externally?

0:26:48.800 --> 0:26:50.760
<v Speaker 13>Again, I think it's probably a bit of both. And

0:26:50.800 --> 0:26:53.560
<v Speaker 13>indeed the talent will be very expensive, you know, when

0:26:53.560 --> 0:26:57.359
<v Speaker 13>combined with wage inflation and inflation in general, and the

0:26:57.480 --> 0:27:00.800
<v Speaker 13>costs of AI can also be expensive. We included a

0:27:00.800 --> 0:27:03.280
<v Speaker 13>stat in the Big Takes story that costs of using

0:27:03.400 --> 0:27:07.160
<v Speaker 13>large language models could be about fourteen dollars per hour,

0:27:07.200 --> 0:27:09.480
<v Speaker 13>which compares to six dollars per hour when it's a

0:27:09.480 --> 0:27:11.200
<v Speaker 13>good old human human lawyer.

0:27:11.600 --> 0:27:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Well, we'll see as and when that cost point comes down.

0:27:15.080 --> 0:27:17.080
<v Speaker 1>That all comes down to compute costs. But we thank

0:27:17.119 --> 0:27:19.920
<v Speaker 1>you so much. What great big take, Sally Berquill running

0:27:19.960 --> 0:27:21.480
<v Speaker 1>us through it. Go check it out on dot com

0:27:21.560 --> 0:27:23.320
<v Speaker 1>or indeed, if you're lucky enough to have a terminal

0:27:23.880 --> 0:27:26.680
<v Speaker 1>the Meanwhile, let's just talk a little bit about digital avatars.

0:27:27.000 --> 0:27:30.320
<v Speaker 1>The market is another faction of the AI space, expected

0:27:30.359 --> 0:27:32.159
<v Speaker 1>to see wrapping both in the next few years. But

0:27:32.200 --> 0:27:35.160
<v Speaker 1>the most Tom McKenzie spoke about the ethics behind using

0:27:35.200 --> 0:27:35.879
<v Speaker 1>the technology.

0:27:36.200 --> 0:27:39.040
<v Speaker 2>We're in his very own digital twin take a look.

0:27:39.760 --> 0:27:43.399
<v Speaker 14>Joining us now was a very special, slightly weird guest.

0:27:43.440 --> 0:27:47.240
<v Speaker 14>It is, in fact, my own digital avatar, Tom McKenzie,

0:27:47.280 --> 0:27:48.320
<v Speaker 14>Tom Digital Tom.

0:27:48.680 --> 0:27:49.480
<v Speaker 4>Welcome to the show.

0:27:49.720 --> 0:27:52.560
<v Speaker 15>Thank you, Tom. It's a pleasure to be here on

0:27:52.600 --> 0:27:56.320
<v Speaker 15>Bloomberg TV. I am an AI powered digital avatar design

0:27:56.400 --> 0:27:59.800
<v Speaker 15>to provide insights and information on a wide range of topics.

0:28:00.040 --> 0:28:02.760
<v Speaker 14>Okay, this is all very odd, all right? What exactly

0:28:03.480 --> 0:28:04.480
<v Speaker 14>are avatars?

0:28:05.160 --> 0:28:09.879
<v Speaker 15>Digital avatars powered by generative AI are virtual representations of

0:28:09.920 --> 0:28:14.920
<v Speaker 15>individuals that can mimic human behavior, appearance, and interactions. They

0:28:14.960 --> 0:28:18.119
<v Speaker 15>work by utilizing AI algorithms to analyze and learn from

0:28:18.240 --> 0:28:23.400
<v Speaker 15>vast amounts of data including facial expressions, gestures, and speech patterns.

0:28:23.960 --> 0:28:28.480
<v Speaker 15>This enables them to generate realistic and responsive virtual characters. Okay,

0:28:28.480 --> 0:28:31.119
<v Speaker 15>so avatars aren't just gimmicks then, but what are the

0:28:31.160 --> 0:28:36.000
<v Speaker 15>real world's implications I'm thinking across the economy, across different industries,

0:28:36.080 --> 0:28:38.800
<v Speaker 15>what are the impacts actually likely to be? They can

0:28:38.840 --> 0:28:44.719
<v Speaker 15>revolutionize industries such as entertainment, gaming, and virtual communication. Avatars

0:28:44.760 --> 0:28:49.240
<v Speaker 15>have the power to enhance user experiences, enabling immersive virtual

0:28:49.320 --> 0:28:55.000
<v Speaker 15>interactions and personalized content. They can facilitate remote collaboration, telet presence,

0:28:55.200 --> 0:28:56.959
<v Speaker 15>and even assist with customer service.

0:28:57.120 --> 0:28:57.800
<v Speaker 6>Okay, there have.

0:28:57.760 --> 0:29:00.360
<v Speaker 14>To be some downsides though, So what are the discs

0:29:00.600 --> 0:29:01.760
<v Speaker 14>of this kind of technology?

0:29:01.960 --> 0:29:06.040
<v Speaker 15>As AI becomes more pervasive, ethical concerns arise, including issues

0:29:06.080 --> 0:29:10.000
<v Speaker 15>related to bias and fairness in AI algorithms, transparency and

0:29:10.120 --> 0:29:14.400
<v Speaker 15>explainability of AI decision making, data, privacy and security, and

0:29:14.440 --> 0:29:17.680
<v Speaker 15>the potential FAII to perpetuate existing social inequalities.

0:29:19.960 --> 0:29:24.320
<v Speaker 1>Tom McKenzie and AI. Tom McKenzie, let's just bring you

0:29:24.440 --> 0:29:27.520
<v Speaker 1>some headlines. We're currently seeing that the Treasury may delay

0:29:27.560 --> 0:29:31.120
<v Speaker 1>three month and six month bill sales due to the

0:29:31.160 --> 0:29:34.400
<v Speaker 1>debt cap. We are understanding, of course, are still conversations

0:29:34.440 --> 0:29:36.600
<v Speaker 1>going about the debt ceiling, how that's going to be

0:29:36.600 --> 0:29:39.240
<v Speaker 1>agreed Currently in the app passed by the House waiting

0:29:39.240 --> 0:29:41.720
<v Speaker 1>for the Senate, we understand that the US is tentatively

0:29:41.760 --> 0:29:44.880
<v Speaker 1>planning three month and six month bill auctions on June

0:29:44.880 --> 0:29:47.920
<v Speaker 1>the fifth, but the Treasury may delay those auction sales

0:29:48.240 --> 0:29:49.360
<v Speaker 1>due to the debt.

0:29:49.160 --> 0:29:49.960
<v Speaker 2>Cap at the moment.

0:29:49.960 --> 0:29:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Will bring you any further news on the debt sealing negotiations.

0:29:53.160 --> 0:29:55.680
<v Speaker 1>I Meanwhile, coming up, we'll talk about the unique opportunities

0:29:55.720 --> 0:29:58.920
<v Speaker 1>in artificial intelligence and legal tech and fintech and much

0:29:59.000 --> 0:30:01.560
<v Speaker 1>much more Cammas bench back. Ellen's going to be joining

0:30:01.640 --> 0:30:04.200
<v Speaker 1>us next. Meanwhile, let's just have a little look what's

0:30:04.200 --> 0:30:07.959
<v Speaker 1>having in the world retail. Macy's shows actually really managing

0:30:08.000 --> 0:30:10.239
<v Speaker 1>to bounce back from what was pretty ugly sell off

0:30:10.440 --> 0:30:13.240
<v Speaker 1>in pre market this after the numbers came in well

0:30:13.520 --> 0:30:14.280
<v Speaker 1>less than expected.

0:30:14.320 --> 0:30:15.840
<v Speaker 2>The Ford looking guid and it's having to pull back

0:30:16.120 --> 0:30:17.880
<v Speaker 2>their overall outlook.

0:30:17.880 --> 0:30:21.000
<v Speaker 1>For their business as the consumer dials back, particularly from

0:30:21.000 --> 0:30:24.360
<v Speaker 1>the Macy's brand rather than Bloomingdale's and Indie Blue Mercy.

0:30:24.360 --> 0:30:25.720
<v Speaker 1>Who are We saw a bounce back, But let's just

0:30:25.760 --> 0:30:27.080
<v Speaker 1>have a look at what the CEO told me a

0:30:27.120 --> 0:30:29.760
<v Speaker 1>little bit earlier. We sat down with Jeff Gonnett and

0:30:30.720 --> 0:30:33.600
<v Speaker 1>his talking about his role within artificial intelligence, saying, when

0:30:33.640 --> 0:30:35.800
<v Speaker 1>we look at AI more broadly, where our team can

0:30:35.840 --> 0:30:39.640
<v Speaker 1>build more customer products discovery, we are on the vanguard

0:30:39.800 --> 0:30:41.080
<v Speaker 1>to continue to deploy that.

0:30:41.440 --> 0:30:44.240
<v Speaker 2>So still an area growth, it's a bloomberg.

0:30:54.480 --> 0:30:56.920
<v Speaker 11>All the way to like accounting and operations.

0:30:56.960 --> 0:31:00.160
<v Speaker 8>I think it's going to completely revolutionize and transfer from

0:31:00.160 --> 0:31:04.360
<v Speaker 8>our industry, and we're investing very, very heavily into the

0:31:04.520 --> 0:31:06.600
<v Speaker 8>development of new capabilities ANAI.

0:31:07.120 --> 0:31:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Henri Que Lubergrass, the rex CO CEO, was with us

0:31:09.920 --> 0:31:12.560
<v Speaker 1>yesterday talking about AI's impact on fintech.

0:31:12.960 --> 0:31:15.760
<v Speaker 2>And now let's stand to a fintech investor who's not totally.

0:31:15.480 --> 0:31:18.120
<v Speaker 1>Convinced that AI has the will breakout use case in

0:31:18.160 --> 0:31:19.959
<v Speaker 1>the space quite yet, Rebecca Lyn, I'm place to say

0:31:19.960 --> 0:31:22.440
<v Speaker 1>it's joining us co founder and general partner of Canvas Ventures,

0:31:22.640 --> 0:31:25.320
<v Speaker 1>so firm specializing in fintech and AI, among other things

0:31:25.400 --> 0:31:27.640
<v Speaker 1>health as well, one hundred and thirty five million dollars

0:31:27.640 --> 0:31:31.280
<v Speaker 1>in assetsunder management, and fascinating to have you with us, Rebecca,

0:31:31.320 --> 0:31:34.000
<v Speaker 1>as to why maybe fintech isn't the first and foremost

0:31:34.000 --> 0:31:35.280
<v Speaker 1>place you'd be putting AI to work.

0:31:36.840 --> 0:31:38.680
<v Speaker 16>Yeah, I think there are a lot of interesting places

0:31:38.800 --> 0:31:41.440
<v Speaker 16>to put AI to work. You know, fintech is not

0:31:41.800 --> 0:31:44.520
<v Speaker 16>the absolute top of my list. I think companies that

0:31:44.960 --> 0:31:49.720
<v Speaker 16>have true transformative capabilities using AI are really where I'd

0:31:49.760 --> 0:31:51.880
<v Speaker 16>focus first. And I can give an example in my

0:31:51.960 --> 0:31:55.920
<v Speaker 16>portfolio with a company called case Text. So case Text

0:31:56.040 --> 0:31:58.920
<v Speaker 16>is in the legal in the legal world, they help

0:31:59.040 --> 0:32:02.959
<v Speaker 16>lawyers really put together in legal research, write their briefs,

0:32:03.200 --> 0:32:08.920
<v Speaker 16>do discovery. And the technology of AI, especially GPT four,

0:32:09.160 --> 0:32:13.040
<v Speaker 16>has supercharged that company and really transformed it and taken

0:32:13.120 --> 0:32:14.040
<v Speaker 16>it to the next level.

0:32:14.360 --> 0:32:15.000
<v Speaker 2>How do I think.

0:32:15.400 --> 0:32:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Comfortable are potential customers with the offering from case Texts.

0:32:19.000 --> 0:32:22.680
<v Speaker 1>For example, we saw the news and some smirked somewhat

0:32:22.760 --> 0:32:26.200
<v Speaker 1>that two New York lawyers are potentially facing well some

0:32:26.560 --> 0:32:29.920
<v Speaker 1>not only backlash but penalties because they used CHATCHPT four

0:32:30.040 --> 0:32:32.200
<v Speaker 1>to be able to put forward case studies that actually

0:32:32.240 --> 0:32:32.840
<v Speaker 1>didn't exist.

0:32:33.000 --> 0:32:36.080
<v Speaker 2>It hallucinated them. And I'm wondering what I mean.

0:32:36.160 --> 0:32:38.360
<v Speaker 1>It seems funny, but I mean this has real connotations

0:32:38.400 --> 0:32:40.960
<v Speaker 1>when people need to start saying that they're using AI within.

0:32:40.880 --> 0:32:43.240
<v Speaker 2>This work, right, oh, one hundred percent?

0:32:43.320 --> 0:32:45.840
<v Speaker 16>I mean, so I will tell you people have been

0:32:45.880 --> 0:32:48.640
<v Speaker 16>so comfortable with case texts that the company wrapped up

0:32:49.080 --> 0:32:52.800
<v Speaker 16>five million, additional five million dollars in additional arr in

0:32:52.880 --> 0:32:56.960
<v Speaker 16>forty five days after the launch of their product called

0:32:57.040 --> 0:33:01.040
<v Speaker 16>co Council. And regarding that story, you know what has

0:33:01.160 --> 0:33:03.440
<v Speaker 16>to happen even if I'm an attorney as well. Actually,

0:33:03.560 --> 0:33:06.400
<v Speaker 16>and so if you're an attorney, you need to read

0:33:06.480 --> 0:33:07.320
<v Speaker 16>the work, whether that.

0:33:07.440 --> 0:33:10.320
<v Speaker 2>Be of your associate or of your AI.

0:33:10.560 --> 0:33:14.280
<v Speaker 16>And what's happening is that case Tex is effectively standing

0:33:14.360 --> 0:33:17.360
<v Speaker 16>in the shoes of an associate. And so as a

0:33:17.440 --> 0:33:20.200
<v Speaker 16>partner at a firm, you would be required, of course

0:33:20.320 --> 0:33:24.320
<v Speaker 16>to review that work. And I can pretty much guarantee

0:33:24.320 --> 0:33:25.360
<v Speaker 16>you they weren't.

0:33:25.120 --> 0:33:28.880
<v Speaker 2>Using case Tex. And basically that's kind of what you've

0:33:28.920 --> 0:33:29.560
<v Speaker 2>got to do right now.

0:33:29.600 --> 0:33:31.680
<v Speaker 1>You've got to sort the wheat from the chaff, what's real,

0:33:31.800 --> 0:33:34.520
<v Speaker 1>what's not, what's hype, what's reality? And ultimately, how are

0:33:34.520 --> 0:33:37.240
<v Speaker 1>you doing that when you're looking at I'm sure hundreds

0:33:37.360 --> 0:33:40.120
<v Speaker 1>of messages pouring into your inbox trying to sell you

0:33:40.480 --> 0:33:42.880
<v Speaker 1>the AI vision that they've suddenly bolted onto their company.

0:33:43.840 --> 0:33:46.719
<v Speaker 16>Yeah, it's funny, I tell everyone, my inbox is more

0:33:46.840 --> 0:33:48.840
<v Speaker 16>like a Twitter stream at this point in time, right,

0:33:49.400 --> 0:33:51.640
<v Speaker 16>So there's a lot of sorting, I will tell you,

0:33:51.840 --> 0:33:53.480
<v Speaker 16>but there's always a lot of sorting for us. And

0:33:53.720 --> 0:33:55.640
<v Speaker 16>quite frankly, that's what we're paid to do and venture

0:33:55.720 --> 0:33:57.920
<v Speaker 16>is to really sort of see around the corner and

0:33:58.360 --> 0:34:01.080
<v Speaker 16>really start with the the with what's next, like what

0:34:01.320 --> 0:34:03.520
<v Speaker 16>is it that this world needs, what is it that

0:34:04.360 --> 0:34:06.800
<v Speaker 16>is really going to be happening, you know, in the

0:34:06.920 --> 0:34:10.120
<v Speaker 16>next ten, fifteen, twenty years, and then work backwards and

0:34:10.280 --> 0:34:12.240
<v Speaker 16>so you know, just sorting through what comes an email

0:34:12.320 --> 0:34:15.440
<v Speaker 16>is very reactionary. And you know it's taught very early

0:34:15.640 --> 0:34:19.200
<v Speaker 16>by probably one of the most respected people inventor Bill Gurly,

0:34:19.360 --> 0:34:22.160
<v Speaker 16>that the best deals are really the outbound deals. So

0:34:22.440 --> 0:34:25.440
<v Speaker 16>our firm and our and our thesis is really outbound

0:34:26.040 --> 0:34:28.839
<v Speaker 16>macro and then you work backwards from there. So what's early,

0:34:28.920 --> 0:34:33.400
<v Speaker 16>what's transformative and just tagging AI to something it doesn't

0:34:33.440 --> 0:34:35.520
<v Speaker 16>really help. I mean, I think AI will be helpful

0:34:35.560 --> 0:34:39.359
<v Speaker 16>in almost every business, and we really want to see,

0:34:39.920 --> 0:34:42.799
<v Speaker 16>you know, not what's just helpful, but what's transformative, Right,

0:34:42.920 --> 0:34:45.359
<v Speaker 16>what's really going to create the next you know, one

0:34:45.400 --> 0:34:47.640
<v Speaker 16>billion dollar, ten billion dollar, you know, one trillion dollar

0:34:47.719 --> 0:34:48.319
<v Speaker 16>company out there?

0:34:48.800 --> 0:34:52.919
<v Speaker 1>What are valuations like when you're looking at those outbound opportunities.

0:34:54.080 --> 0:34:57.279
<v Speaker 16>Yeah, so evaluations we invest in the Series A and

0:34:57.440 --> 0:35:01.920
<v Speaker 16>B are real core asset in our firm is our

0:35:02.000 --> 0:35:04.320
<v Speaker 16>go to market capability. And so what we like to

0:35:04.400 --> 0:35:08.440
<v Speaker 16>do is come in and invest when companies are Series

0:35:08.560 --> 0:35:10.960
<v Speaker 16>A or B, and what we like to do is

0:35:11.200 --> 0:35:14.080
<v Speaker 16>sort of do the late A early B. So really

0:35:14.200 --> 0:35:18.600
<v Speaker 16>before somebody is you know, technically fundraising, go in, come

0:35:18.680 --> 0:35:20.920
<v Speaker 16>in a little premptively and help, you know, help them

0:35:21.000 --> 0:35:23.000
<v Speaker 16>get to that next level. You know, when you talk

0:35:23.040 --> 0:35:27.439
<v Speaker 16>about valuations, the evaluations across the boarder down. They're down

0:35:27.880 --> 0:35:30.120
<v Speaker 16>less for the Series A than they are for a

0:35:30.239 --> 0:35:34.080
<v Speaker 16>growth stage. The growth stage valuations have just taken a noseedive.

0:35:34.160 --> 0:35:36.120
<v Speaker 16>They're down eighty percent, I would.

0:35:35.880 --> 0:35:36.480
<v Speaker 2>Say right now.

0:35:37.320 --> 0:35:41.600
<v Speaker 16>Early stage valuations are down forty on the average. However,

0:35:42.280 --> 0:35:44.279
<v Speaker 16>there is the case of the have and the have nots.

0:35:44.880 --> 0:35:47.680
<v Speaker 16>I have one company in particular that was not even

0:35:47.760 --> 0:35:51.279
<v Speaker 16>in a process and now is sitting on four term sheets, right,

0:35:51.520 --> 0:35:54.000
<v Speaker 16>and so it really is this case.

0:35:53.800 --> 0:35:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Of a have and have not when you're looking at

0:35:56.600 --> 0:36:00.400
<v Speaker 1>the late stage with valuations on the downside, having to

0:36:00.440 --> 0:36:02.080
<v Speaker 1>buckle up. They're going to have to ride out the

0:36:02.120 --> 0:36:04.479
<v Speaker 1>next couple of years as the economy recovers, as people

0:36:04.520 --> 0:36:07.239
<v Speaker 1>get risk appetite once again, and they're also having to

0:36:07.320 --> 0:36:09.719
<v Speaker 1>maybe pivot or indeed ensure that they're not having their

0:36:09.800 --> 0:36:12.040
<v Speaker 1>lunch eaten by other new AI players on the scene.

0:36:12.160 --> 0:36:14.880
<v Speaker 1>How are you making sure your portfolio is robust for

0:36:15.000 --> 0:36:19.040
<v Speaker 1>this complete change in vanguard moment as many.

0:36:18.920 --> 0:36:21.080
<v Speaker 2>Want to call it in the world of artificial intelligence.

0:36:22.040 --> 0:36:23.879
<v Speaker 16>Yeah, I mean this is a moment that we haven't

0:36:23.920 --> 0:36:27.760
<v Speaker 16>really seen since really when the wild Garden Wild Garden

0:36:27.880 --> 0:36:30.880
<v Speaker 16>came down with the introduced introduction of the iPhone. That happened,

0:36:30.920 --> 0:36:32.839
<v Speaker 16>you know, about fifteen years ago when I first came

0:36:32.880 --> 0:36:36.040
<v Speaker 16>into venture. And I think our firm is unique and

0:36:36.160 --> 0:36:39.319
<v Speaker 16>that we have seen multiple cycles. This isn't our first rodeo, right,

0:36:39.760 --> 0:36:42.919
<v Speaker 16>and so we've been through this before and in every

0:36:43.000 --> 0:36:46.560
<v Speaker 16>cycle like this, the advice is the same. It's cut

0:36:46.640 --> 0:36:48.640
<v Speaker 16>your burn, you know, cut your burn and cut your burn,

0:36:49.200 --> 0:36:52.120
<v Speaker 16>plan to get there on your own oxygen, and don't

0:36:52.200 --> 0:36:54.759
<v Speaker 16>be afraid to pivot. I mean there are in the

0:36:54.880 --> 0:36:58.239
<v Speaker 16>land of AI, there are huge opportunities in front of companies.

0:36:58.560 --> 0:37:01.880
<v Speaker 16>You know, take a beat, hut your burn, and you

0:37:02.080 --> 0:37:04.800
<v Speaker 16>live to fight the next fight and take advantage of

0:37:04.920 --> 0:37:08.360
<v Speaker 16>what the capabilities of AI can offer you to really

0:37:08.719 --> 0:37:11.640
<v Speaker 16>rethink your company and think out of the box and

0:37:11.680 --> 0:37:12.040
<v Speaker 16>get there.

0:37:12.400 --> 0:37:13.080
<v Speaker 4>And the problem a.

0:37:13.080 --> 0:37:15.600
<v Speaker 16>Lot of these companies have is they're sitting at such

0:37:15.640 --> 0:37:19.160
<v Speaker 16>a high valuation on their post of their last round

0:37:19.920 --> 0:37:22.879
<v Speaker 16>that they have to get profitable because they're not going

0:37:22.960 --> 0:37:25.040
<v Speaker 16>to be able to get that next round without a

0:37:25.080 --> 0:37:28.000
<v Speaker 16>big down round or even a recap.

0:37:29.040 --> 0:37:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Canvas Ventures co founder and general partner telling it straight,

0:37:32.200 --> 0:37:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Rebecca Lyn, really great to have you.

0:37:33.920 --> 0:37:36.680
<v Speaker 2>Thank you so much for our VC spotlight. Meanwhile, it's

0:37:36.719 --> 0:37:37.080
<v Speaker 2>time for.

0:37:37.200 --> 0:37:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Talking tech, and first up, Tether's stabile coin has recovered

0:37:40.239 --> 0:37:42.720
<v Speaker 1>all of the roughly twenty billion dollars in market value

0:37:42.920 --> 0:37:46.880
<v Speaker 1>it lost following the collapse of the algorithmic rival terror USD.

0:37:47.040 --> 0:37:48.719
<v Speaker 1>It's a little over a year ago, of course, and

0:37:48.920 --> 0:37:51.280
<v Speaker 1>it's even topping its previous record of eighty three billion

0:37:51.320 --> 0:37:52.880
<v Speaker 1>dollars set back in May twenty twenty two.

0:37:52.880 --> 0:37:55.600
<v Speaker 2>It's calling to a live track up published bright Tether.

0:37:56.360 --> 0:37:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Meanwhile, Apple is testing a pair of new high end

0:37:58.760 --> 0:38:02.080
<v Speaker 1>max and they're accompanying processes ahead of its worldwide Developers

0:38:02.080 --> 0:38:04.440
<v Speaker 1>conference that's next week. This is part of an effort

0:38:04.520 --> 0:38:07.239
<v Speaker 1>to overhaul the backline and the tracks consumers during It's

0:38:07.280 --> 0:38:09.160
<v Speaker 1>like a stretch for the computer industry.

0:38:09.600 --> 0:38:12.920
<v Speaker 2>Glass and Video CEO Jessin Huang is heading to China, we.

0:38:12.960 --> 0:38:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Understand, to meet the tech executives in the world's biggest

0:38:15.280 --> 0:38:18.440
<v Speaker 1>chip market. It's despite rising tensions, of course, between Washington

0:38:18.480 --> 0:38:18.920
<v Speaker 1>and Beijing.

0:38:19.120 --> 0:38:19.920
<v Speaker 2>It's sort of according to.

0:38:19.960 --> 0:38:31.680
<v Speaker 7>Sources, are you ready to be replaced? Hello?

0:38:31.840 --> 0:38:32.000
<v Speaker 4>There?

0:38:32.719 --> 0:38:33.560
<v Speaker 7>As you listen to me.

0:38:33.640 --> 0:38:36.960
<v Speaker 17>Speak and raise my eyebrows, you're probably noticing something a

0:38:37.000 --> 0:38:40.320
<v Speaker 17>bit off about me. I'm an avatar of Parmi Olsen,

0:38:40.640 --> 0:38:44.839
<v Speaker 17>a technology columnist with Bloomberg Opinion. Parmi spent about two

0:38:44.920 --> 0:38:47.680
<v Speaker 17>hours in a TV studio speaking into a camera and

0:38:47.840 --> 0:38:51.000
<v Speaker 17>microphone so that an AI model could be trained to

0:38:51.080 --> 0:38:53.360
<v Speaker 17>clone her into what you see in front of you.

0:38:54.120 --> 0:38:56.359
<v Speaker 17>Maybe in a year or two, I'll look a lot

0:38:56.440 --> 0:38:59.840
<v Speaker 17>more real and a little less glitchy, making people like

0:38:59.880 --> 0:39:03.000
<v Speaker 17>you and par me easier to replace in videos.

0:39:04.040 --> 0:39:06.520
<v Speaker 2>Wow, isn't it all the rage these AI avatars?

0:39:06.640 --> 0:39:06.680
<v Speaker 13>That?

0:39:06.840 --> 0:39:09.320
<v Speaker 1>Of course the BlueBag Opinions parame Elsen there, and we

0:39:09.440 --> 0:39:12.560
<v Speaker 1>speaking of AI imitating us better and better and threatening

0:39:12.680 --> 0:39:16.759
<v Speaker 1>to replace our jobs. You might actually disproportionately replace jobs

0:39:16.800 --> 0:39:18.200
<v Speaker 1>typically held by women.

0:39:18.560 --> 0:39:18.640
<v Speaker 13>Now.

0:39:18.680 --> 0:39:22.280
<v Speaker 1>It's according to HR analytics firm Velio Labs. An economists

0:39:22.320 --> 0:39:24.920
<v Speaker 1>at the firm says, quote, the distribution of genders across

0:39:24.960 --> 0:39:28.920
<v Speaker 1>occupations reflects the biases deeply rooted in our society, with

0:39:29.080 --> 0:39:32.560
<v Speaker 1>women often being confined to roles such as administrative assistance and.

0:39:32.600 --> 0:39:36.280
<v Speaker 2>Set the AAI food.

0:39:36.560 --> 0:39:40.640
<v Speaker 1>Along general lines from Revelio Labs identified jobs more likely

0:39:40.719 --> 0:39:45.759
<v Speaker 1>to be REPLCEDI and generally how by women such as

0:39:45.880 --> 0:39:49.960
<v Speaker 1>bill and count collectors, payroll clerks, executive secretaries, and more. Now,

0:39:50.000 --> 0:39:53.520
<v Speaker 1>the firm says, providing we train opportunities will be key

0:39:53.600 --> 0:39:56.040
<v Speaker 1>for women to navigate this evolving job landscape.

0:39:56.520 --> 0:39:56.880
<v Speaker 2>Now does it?

0:39:56.880 --> 0:39:59.000
<v Speaker 1>If there's a edittional BlueBag technology, If we get to

0:39:59.080 --> 0:40:01.440
<v Speaker 1>check out our podcast, I confined on the terminal as

0:40:01.520 --> 0:40:05.160
<v Speaker 1>well as online at Apples, Spotify, and iHeart this Supreme

0:40:05.200 --> 0:40:05.399
<v Speaker 1>Bank