WEBVTT - Can the Sox fix their pitching issues? | Episode 111

0:00:00.440 --> 0:00:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Suns on thirty fifth is next doors open on the left.

0:00:12.920 --> 0:00:15.040
<v Speaker 1>How's it going? Everybody is well?

0:00:15.080 --> 0:00:17.320
<v Speaker 2>I guess while he gets that figured out, Nick, welcome back.

0:00:17.360 --> 0:00:20.640
<v Speaker 3>How are you yeah? Doing well?

0:00:21.280 --> 0:00:23.239
<v Speaker 4>Been a busy couple of weeks, but it's been nice

0:00:23.239 --> 0:00:25.200
<v Speaker 4>that the White Sauce are still relevant into June. Not

0:00:25.280 --> 0:00:29.200
<v Speaker 4>what I was expecting. So yeah, not not too bad

0:00:29.240 --> 0:00:29.880
<v Speaker 4>all things since there?

0:00:29.920 --> 0:00:30.360
<v Speaker 3>How about you?

0:00:31.840 --> 0:00:32.280
<v Speaker 5>Fine?

0:00:32.400 --> 0:00:35.560
<v Speaker 6>I guess frustrated like I don't. It's it's so funny

0:00:35.600 --> 0:00:38.760
<v Speaker 6>as we start to have these conversations and we start

0:00:38.800 --> 0:00:41.480
<v Speaker 6>to figure out, you know, to your point, like they're

0:00:41.479 --> 0:00:44.520
<v Speaker 6>still relevant in June. We're still going through that process.

0:00:45.760 --> 0:00:53.320
<v Speaker 6>But I I'm trying to gauge against like, oh, they

0:00:53.680 --> 0:00:56.800
<v Speaker 6>are relevant in June and they weren't supposed to be

0:00:57.280 --> 0:00:59.480
<v Speaker 6>and everything that goes along with that. So I don't know,

0:00:59.560 --> 0:01:05.000
<v Speaker 6>Like I don't know how to feel about things. It's frustrating, right,

0:01:05.040 --> 0:01:10.200
<v Speaker 6>Like it's frustrating to half weeks like this, where you

0:01:10.240 --> 0:01:14.200
<v Speaker 6>can play Minnesota, play Philadelphia and it goes fine relative

0:01:14.360 --> 0:01:19.520
<v Speaker 6>to maybe your original season expectations, but still aren't good

0:01:19.600 --> 0:01:21.479
<v Speaker 6>enough long term, so.

0:01:23.520 --> 0:01:24.119
<v Speaker 3>Right, right?

0:01:24.160 --> 0:01:27.240
<v Speaker 4>And I think also the Murakami injury, like everyone's goal

0:01:27.360 --> 0:01:29.240
<v Speaker 4>right now, These the fans that I talked to, they

0:01:29.280 --> 0:01:31.480
<v Speaker 4>just want to tread water until he comes back. Hopefully

0:01:31.480 --> 0:01:33.440
<v Speaker 4>you when he gets back here, still within a few

0:01:33.440 --> 0:01:37.360
<v Speaker 4>games of five hundred on the downside, worst case, but still,

0:01:37.400 --> 0:01:39.760
<v Speaker 4>you know, it's frustrating because the offense actually has been

0:01:39.760 --> 0:01:42.680
<v Speaker 4>pretty decent since he went down, and it's the pitching,

0:01:42.800 --> 0:01:45.839
<v Speaker 4>as the theme of this episode is the issue right now,

0:01:45.920 --> 0:01:49.040
<v Speaker 4>So hoping that starts to balance outt a bit more.

0:01:49.120 --> 0:01:52.120
<v Speaker 4>But the schedule is a meat grinder right now, So

0:01:52.720 --> 0:01:54.800
<v Speaker 4>the next couple of weeks might be rough, but who knows,

0:01:54.840 --> 0:01:55.880
<v Speaker 4>maybe we will be surprised.

0:01:57.520 --> 0:01:59.880
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I think at the end of the day, you know,

0:02:00.720 --> 0:02:04.240
<v Speaker 6>to play they the way they did against.

0:02:03.800 --> 0:02:05.600
<v Speaker 2>Oh look who decided to join.

0:02:05.520 --> 0:02:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Back the life of me?

0:02:07.840 --> 0:02:11.040
<v Speaker 5>Do not understand why my computer just decided to reset

0:02:11.080 --> 0:02:13.760
<v Speaker 5>the second I started, you know, doing my stick.

0:02:13.840 --> 0:02:15.800
<v Speaker 1>But here we are, I'm I don't know.

0:02:16.320 --> 0:02:18.360
<v Speaker 6>We were doing fines between the two of us, so

0:02:18.720 --> 0:02:21.320
<v Speaker 6>we were considering not even letting you back in. So

0:02:21.680 --> 0:02:23.240
<v Speaker 6>we didn't get far though, So if you want to

0:02:23.360 --> 0:02:25.800
<v Speaker 6>just tell us how you're doing and intro us, go

0:02:25.919 --> 0:02:26.400
<v Speaker 6>right ahead.

0:02:27.520 --> 0:02:29.800
<v Speaker 5>Okay, I guess I'll just pop in and you know,

0:02:29.960 --> 0:02:31.880
<v Speaker 5>catch up with where we're at. As you know, Jordan

0:02:31.960 --> 0:02:33.600
<v Speaker 5>Lasky just fucking bodied me.

0:02:34.720 --> 0:02:35.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm good.

0:02:35.760 --> 0:02:38.800
<v Speaker 5>I've had a that was a little hectic, but I

0:02:38.800 --> 0:02:40.640
<v Speaker 5>guess it kind of fits into the fact that I

0:02:40.639 --> 0:02:43.160
<v Speaker 5>went to Banana Ball yesterday and that was probably the

0:02:43.200 --> 0:02:44.840
<v Speaker 5>most hectic sporting that I've ever been to.

0:02:46.560 --> 0:02:47.800
<v Speaker 1>But besides that, I'm good.

0:02:49.520 --> 0:02:53.440
<v Speaker 5>Hopefully this recording just keeps on rolling on, But uh,

0:02:53.760 --> 0:02:54.480
<v Speaker 5>I don't know how.

0:02:54.400 --> 0:02:55.880
<v Speaker 1>You how are you guys doing? I didn't get to

0:02:55.880 --> 0:02:56.919
<v Speaker 1>hear how you guys are.

0:02:56.800 --> 0:03:00.400
<v Speaker 6>Doing all things consider, we were just kind of baiting

0:03:00.400 --> 0:03:03.239
<v Speaker 6>the back and forth of like the frustrations of this week,

0:03:03.240 --> 0:03:05.400
<v Speaker 6>which we'll talk about in the Pitching staff, but also

0:03:05.560 --> 0:03:07.960
<v Speaker 6>trying to balance it against well, did we even think

0:03:08.000 --> 0:03:09.840
<v Speaker 6>they were going to be here in the first place?

0:03:10.440 --> 0:03:11.600
<v Speaker 2>So it's hard.

0:03:12.960 --> 0:03:15.000
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, No, I mean that's fair enough. Well, I guess

0:03:15.040 --> 0:03:16.679
<v Speaker 5>I'll just pick up right where we were at.

0:03:16.720 --> 0:03:16.919
<v Speaker 1>Then.

0:03:17.919 --> 0:03:22.160
<v Speaker 5>That is great to hear, gentlemen, We have quite a

0:03:22.200 --> 0:03:25.079
<v Speaker 5>bit covering this episode, obviously, with the White Sox going

0:03:25.120 --> 0:03:28.120
<v Speaker 5>four and four in the last eight Before we get started,

0:03:28.160 --> 0:03:30.520
<v Speaker 5>be sure and suscribed the podcast and Apple, Spotify, YouTube

0:03:30.560 --> 0:03:32.840
<v Speaker 5>and everyone else to get your podcast. Also sure check

0:03:32.840 --> 0:03:34.680
<v Speaker 5>out the website sucks on thirty fifth dot com, as

0:03:34.720 --> 0:03:37.080
<v Speaker 5>I'll following us on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram at socks

0:03:37.120 --> 0:03:38.280
<v Speaker 5>on thirty fifth.

0:03:40.480 --> 0:03:42.119
<v Speaker 1>Believe that's correct, because.

0:03:41.920 --> 0:03:44.680
<v Speaker 5>I'm seeing that we have gone four and fourth into

0:03:44.920 --> 0:03:47.200
<v Speaker 5>talking more Kami's injury.

0:03:48.200 --> 0:03:50.560
<v Speaker 2>That's right, it's correct.

0:03:50.680 --> 0:03:52.400
<v Speaker 6>I mean I didn't count the day he got hurt,

0:03:52.480 --> 0:03:55.320
<v Speaker 6>so four and four, Like, I guess we'll call it that,

0:03:55.560 --> 0:03:57.520
<v Speaker 6>just putting asterisks there if that's what you want to do.

0:03:57.600 --> 0:04:01.760
<v Speaker 5>But no, I think that's I think that's fair. You know,

0:04:01.920 --> 0:04:06.080
<v Speaker 5>it's it's one of those tough things, you know. And obviously, Nick,

0:04:06.120 --> 0:04:08.080
<v Speaker 5>I'll let you kind of jump into this and take

0:04:08.080 --> 0:04:11.160
<v Speaker 5>the run on it. But so the White Sox scored

0:04:11.200 --> 0:04:13.560
<v Speaker 5>five point six runs a game gone four and four.

0:04:14.440 --> 0:04:16.400
<v Speaker 5>I'm sure that runs numbers changed a little bit with

0:04:16.440 --> 0:04:19.880
<v Speaker 5>the final game on Sunday here, but the team's pitching

0:04:19.920 --> 0:04:23.440
<v Speaker 5>staff has continued to be an issue. It's something we've

0:04:23.440 --> 0:04:25.000
<v Speaker 5>been dealing with really all week.

0:04:25.880 --> 0:04:26.080
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:04:26.160 --> 0:04:28.880
<v Speaker 5>I think it's it's a bad sign when Brian Hudson's

0:04:28.880 --> 0:04:31.640
<v Speaker 5>having it has a really bad run, because I think

0:04:31.680 --> 0:04:34.880
<v Speaker 5>that's a sign that everybody's kind of struggling. But how

0:04:34.920 --> 0:04:37.160
<v Speaker 5>do you how you've been feeling about what you've been

0:04:37.160 --> 0:04:38.560
<v Speaker 5>seeing out of the bullpen and the pitching.

0:04:39.920 --> 0:04:41.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean, Brian Hudson's the guy, but when he

0:04:41.839 --> 0:04:44.640
<v Speaker 4>allows a run, I'm not even remotely upset for disappointed.

0:04:44.640 --> 0:04:47.120
<v Speaker 4>It's like you can let in like five runs one

0:04:47.160 --> 0:04:49.040
<v Speaker 4>of these days if you want, and you've still given

0:04:49.080 --> 0:04:51.200
<v Speaker 4>so much value to this team that we weren't expecting that.

0:04:51.320 --> 0:04:55.480
<v Speaker 4>Like you're in the clear, right, So the bullpen kind

0:04:55.480 --> 0:04:57.480
<v Speaker 4>of is what it is. I mean, obviously Taylor and

0:04:57.640 --> 0:04:59.960
<v Speaker 4>newcom and then you have Hudson and to Meingaz though

0:05:00.120 --> 0:05:03.080
<v Speaker 4>the dependable guys. It is a little bit upsetting to

0:05:03.120 --> 0:05:06.120
<v Speaker 4>see Tyler Davis starting to maybe show some signs that

0:05:06.440 --> 0:05:09.279
<v Speaker 4>he might not be you know who he was looking

0:05:09.360 --> 0:05:11.440
<v Speaker 4>like the first month or so, because he was a guy.

0:05:11.520 --> 0:05:13.080
<v Speaker 3>Him coming out to nowhere it was really helpful.

0:05:13.400 --> 0:05:16.080
<v Speaker 4>Maybe that's where Ben People finally gets his chance, Like

0:05:16.080 --> 0:05:19.080
<v Speaker 4>maybe that's a move that has to happen. But overall,

0:05:19.160 --> 0:05:22.080
<v Speaker 4>I mean, the starting pitching is to be concerned for me,

0:05:22.279 --> 0:05:24.039
<v Speaker 4>because there's really not much you can do right now

0:05:24.160 --> 0:05:28.760
<v Speaker 4>with Noah Schultz injured, Shane Smith injured, Tanner McDougal injured.

0:05:29.400 --> 0:05:32.279
<v Speaker 4>Hagen Smith may be ready somewhat soon in the last

0:05:32.279 --> 0:05:34.599
<v Speaker 4>couple of weeks, but he just pitched today on Sunday,

0:05:34.680 --> 0:05:36.200
<v Speaker 4>so it's not like he's going to be starting against

0:05:36.240 --> 0:05:39.680
<v Speaker 4>the Braves in that series. So you kind of have

0:05:39.720 --> 0:05:41.720
<v Speaker 4>to write out the storm a little bit with Fetti

0:05:41.800 --> 0:05:45.080
<v Speaker 4>and with Kay right now. Obviously Kay has been better

0:05:45.160 --> 0:05:48.840
<v Speaker 4>this season overall than Fetti, but not by a huge gap.

0:05:48.960 --> 0:05:50.520
<v Speaker 4>Lease in my opinion, I think Era is a little

0:05:50.520 --> 0:05:53.160
<v Speaker 4>bit deceiving there. So you kind of have to weather

0:05:53.200 --> 0:05:55.119
<v Speaker 4>the storm for the next two weeks and maybe hagen

0:05:55.120 --> 0:05:57.440
<v Speaker 4>Smith joins the rotation in that time, maybe Noah Schultz

0:05:57.440 --> 0:05:57.880
<v Speaker 4>comes back.

0:05:57.920 --> 0:05:59.799
<v Speaker 3>But for me, the bigger blow is McDougall.

0:05:59.800 --> 0:06:02.039
<v Speaker 4>I think McDougal would have been up like three or

0:06:02.040 --> 0:06:03.719
<v Speaker 4>four weeks ago had he not gotten hurt, and he

0:06:03.800 --> 0:06:06.520
<v Speaker 4>was the best picture at Triple A, and I think

0:06:06.520 --> 0:06:08.599
<v Speaker 4>he's the kind of guy whould have a big impact immediately.

0:06:08.680 --> 0:06:10.919
<v Speaker 4>So silver lining of that, of course, is when he

0:06:10.960 --> 0:06:12.880
<v Speaker 4>does get healthy, it'll be nice to see him in

0:06:12.880 --> 0:06:14.880
<v Speaker 4>the big leagues and I think he could be, you know,

0:06:15.200 --> 0:06:17.960
<v Speaker 4>actually quite valuable right off the bat. But until then,

0:06:18.000 --> 0:06:20.560
<v Speaker 4>we just got to kind of deal with it. And

0:06:20.680 --> 0:06:22.080
<v Speaker 4>just see what happens.

0:06:22.080 --> 0:06:24.760
<v Speaker 6>I guess you know we've talked about this a little

0:06:24.760 --> 0:06:28.919
<v Speaker 6>bit too, when we've talked kind of the Rays or

0:06:28.920 --> 0:06:32.800
<v Speaker 6>the Brewer strategy of either bullpen building or rotation building

0:06:32.880 --> 0:06:36.000
<v Speaker 6>or whatever you want to call it. At a certain

0:06:36.040 --> 0:06:39.000
<v Speaker 6>point it comes to where you got to switch up

0:06:39.040 --> 0:06:42.200
<v Speaker 6>the rolodex of pictures again. You have to do something different.

0:06:42.320 --> 0:06:44.960
<v Speaker 6>You got to try again with a different group. And

0:06:45.040 --> 0:06:46.839
<v Speaker 6>it almost feels like you're starting to get there again.

0:06:47.200 --> 0:06:49.480
<v Speaker 6>To your point, Nick, like Tyler Davis is kind of

0:06:49.520 --> 0:06:52.039
<v Speaker 6>slowing down a little bit, not exactly showing especially over

0:06:52.080 --> 0:06:54.680
<v Speaker 6>the last fifteen appearances, like what he may have been

0:06:54.720 --> 0:07:00.080
<v Speaker 6>early on Tyler Gilbert. I continue to wonder how he

0:07:00.320 --> 0:07:04.159
<v Speaker 6>gets the opportunities. But like I get, I get you

0:07:04.240 --> 0:07:08.800
<v Speaker 6>have to continue to churn demingas has looked up and down.

0:07:09.120 --> 0:07:13.720
<v Speaker 6>The only dependable name you've had to for for Will

0:07:13.800 --> 0:07:15.480
<v Speaker 6>Venable is Grand Taylor.

0:07:15.600 --> 0:07:18.920
<v Speaker 2>And and that's an inning here or there. I don't know.

0:07:18.960 --> 0:07:22.000
<v Speaker 6>I look at it, and I wonder if there's an

0:07:22.000 --> 0:07:25.640
<v Speaker 6>opportunity to start getting Grant Taylor more innings and like

0:07:25.720 --> 0:07:30.880
<v Speaker 6>the two or three inning variety again, because this rotation's bad,

0:07:31.120 --> 0:07:35.840
<v Speaker 6>like it's bad and there's no real reinforcements in sight

0:07:36.040 --> 0:07:39.520
<v Speaker 6>when you have no Ah Schultz on the injury list

0:07:39.600 --> 0:07:43.720
<v Speaker 6>right now and you have Tan McDougal still hurt. Hagen

0:07:43.760 --> 0:07:46.360
<v Speaker 6>Smith might be on the way, but I don't know

0:07:46.360 --> 0:07:47.840
<v Speaker 6>that there's a lot of different ways they're gonna have

0:07:47.840 --> 0:07:49.440
<v Speaker 6>to kind of get funky with it. But again, you're

0:07:49.480 --> 0:07:51.720
<v Speaker 6>gonna you're gonna have to try and get funky with

0:07:51.760 --> 0:07:55.120
<v Speaker 6>it again, Like you can't continue to churn the same

0:07:55.160 --> 0:07:57.240
<v Speaker 6>way you've been going because it's it's worked great for

0:07:57.240 --> 0:08:00.880
<v Speaker 6>a while, but those teams don't just sit on It's

0:08:00.880 --> 0:08:02.280
<v Speaker 6>time to try the next couple of names.

0:08:02.320 --> 0:08:02.960
<v Speaker 1>I think.

0:08:06.760 --> 0:08:07.880
<v Speaker 2>Now he's muted too.

0:08:09.640 --> 0:08:11.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm just bat in a thousand.

0:08:12.240 --> 0:08:16.240
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it's funny because you know, I I started up

0:08:16.280 --> 0:08:18.840
<v Speaker 5>my computer. I tried, like I uninstalled a bunch of

0:08:18.840 --> 0:08:22.600
<v Speaker 5>stuff to make it faster. But uh, you know, the

0:08:22.640 --> 0:08:24.440
<v Speaker 5>thing with this pitching staff right now is like there's

0:08:24.440 --> 0:08:28.000
<v Speaker 5>not a lot of swinging this stuff over the last

0:08:28.080 --> 0:08:30.120
<v Speaker 5>over the last week here, and this isn't including Sunday

0:08:30.120 --> 0:08:33.480
<v Speaker 5>with the Phillies. Just because Baseball Reference love them to death,

0:08:33.480 --> 0:08:35.319
<v Speaker 5>they're a little bit slow up bringing their stats up, but.

0:08:35.240 --> 0:08:36.600
<v Speaker 1>They do do really good splits.

0:08:37.520 --> 0:08:40.720
<v Speaker 5>We're looking at forty eight strikeouts and twenty two walks

0:08:40.720 --> 0:08:44.280
<v Speaker 5>in the last six games with for four seven six ERA,

0:08:45.520 --> 0:08:48.880
<v Speaker 5>forty five hits and fifty one innings credited. That's that's

0:08:48.920 --> 0:08:51.880
<v Speaker 5>brutal like that, that is very tough to be able

0:08:51.920 --> 0:08:54.559
<v Speaker 5>to get that out of out of your pitching staff.

0:08:55.280 --> 0:08:57.440
<v Speaker 5>And it's even more brutal when you consider how well

0:08:57.480 --> 0:08:59.400
<v Speaker 5>our offense has been been scoring. You know, a guy

0:08:59.440 --> 0:09:01.840
<v Speaker 5>like Jacin's all comes up. He's been a he's been

0:09:01.880 --> 0:09:04.920
<v Speaker 5>a really nice hot bat. Colson has had struggles, but

0:09:04.960 --> 0:09:06.839
<v Speaker 5>obviously he's gotten it going a little bit more as

0:09:06.840 --> 0:09:11.760
<v Speaker 5>of late. So really the only thing you're really looking

0:09:11.800 --> 0:09:14.679
<v Speaker 5>at here is you can either you know, stick with it,

0:09:14.960 --> 0:09:16.920
<v Speaker 5>go part for the course, just hope that this is

0:09:16.920 --> 0:09:19.560
<v Speaker 5>a slow run, or kind of like you guys are saying,

0:09:20.440 --> 0:09:22.920
<v Speaker 5>start kind of picking into the minors and bring a

0:09:22.920 --> 0:09:25.000
<v Speaker 5>guy up and see if you know, somebody can get

0:09:25.000 --> 0:09:27.920
<v Speaker 5>an opportunity here, because if there is a situation where

0:09:28.000 --> 0:09:31.480
<v Speaker 5>we're not looking into buying at the deadline, our minor

0:09:31.559 --> 0:09:34.200
<v Speaker 5>league system has to be utilized in situations like this.

0:09:35.000 --> 0:09:37.200
<v Speaker 5>Guy like Eric Fetty was somebody that you brought up.

0:09:37.280 --> 0:09:41.000
<v Speaker 5>Nick as our fifth guy. I think he's probably the

0:09:41.080 --> 0:09:43.959
<v Speaker 5>least offensive to me right now, just based on he

0:09:44.360 --> 0:09:46.320
<v Speaker 5>can eat up some innings and he can occasionally have

0:09:46.360 --> 0:09:49.160
<v Speaker 5>a really good start. That's what you want out of

0:09:49.200 --> 0:09:51.000
<v Speaker 5>your fifth starter. But when we're looking at the top

0:09:51.040 --> 0:09:53.040
<v Speaker 5>line of the pitching rotation, we need a lot more.

0:09:53.360 --> 0:09:54.960
<v Speaker 1>We need to be able to get more production out

0:09:55.000 --> 0:09:55.160
<v Speaker 1>of that.

0:09:55.320 --> 0:09:57.840
<v Speaker 5>And I'm not saying that needs to be a situation

0:09:57.960 --> 0:10:00.160
<v Speaker 5>where Fetti needs a bigger role or anything. You know,

0:10:00.200 --> 0:10:02.120
<v Speaker 5>If anything, Fetty's a guy that's gonna be on the

0:10:02.120 --> 0:10:04.200
<v Speaker 5>outside looking in once we start looking at what our

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:05.719
<v Speaker 5>rotation is going to look like for the rest of

0:10:05.720 --> 0:10:09.199
<v Speaker 5>the season. But we need more from guy like Anthony

0:10:09.280 --> 0:10:13.880
<v Speaker 5>k just overall across the board. We need our starting rotation,

0:10:14.160 --> 0:10:16.280
<v Speaker 5>and this isn't an ideal situation, so that's something you

0:10:16.280 --> 0:10:17.920
<v Speaker 5>want to ask your rotation to do. But we need

0:10:17.960 --> 0:10:20.160
<v Speaker 5>our starting rotation to protect our bullpen as much as

0:10:20.240 --> 0:10:21.440
<v Speaker 5>humanly possible because.

0:10:21.200 --> 0:10:23.280
<v Speaker 1>We're just not getting enough outs from them right now.

0:10:24.600 --> 0:10:27.880
<v Speaker 5>Grant Taylor's great. Like Grant Taylor is one of my favorite,

0:10:28.320 --> 0:10:30.880
<v Speaker 5>it should be a lot of people's favorite relief pitcher

0:10:30.880 --> 0:10:31.760
<v Speaker 5>in baseball right now, just.

0:10:31.720 --> 0:10:33.839
<v Speaker 1>Because he's absolutely dynamite on the mound.

0:10:34.400 --> 0:10:37.400
<v Speaker 5>We don't want to throw his arm off, Like this

0:10:37.440 --> 0:10:39.160
<v Speaker 5>isn't a situation where we're gonna have him carry our

0:10:39.280 --> 0:10:40.320
<v Speaker 5>entire bullpen all season.

0:10:40.400 --> 0:10:41.160
<v Speaker 1>We can't do that.

0:10:41.720 --> 0:10:44.120
<v Speaker 5>We've done in the past with Garak Crochet, Michael Kopek,

0:10:44.800 --> 0:10:46.840
<v Speaker 5>both scenarios that did not end up well in the

0:10:46.880 --> 0:10:47.440
<v Speaker 5>long run.

0:10:47.720 --> 0:10:49.080
<v Speaker 1>So we need.

0:10:48.880 --> 0:10:51.679
<v Speaker 5>More from from our back end bullpen guys. We need

0:10:51.720 --> 0:10:54.480
<v Speaker 5>more guys that can be able to eat innings. Brian Hudson.

0:10:54.760 --> 0:10:56.840
<v Speaker 5>As as you said, isn't somebody that's gonna offend me

0:10:56.840 --> 0:10:58.040
<v Speaker 5>if he has a bad game.

0:10:57.840 --> 0:10:59.120
<v Speaker 1>But he needs to.

0:10:59.600 --> 0:11:01.440
<v Speaker 5>He needs to bring it, bring it back to where

0:11:01.480 --> 0:11:03.360
<v Speaker 5>he was, you know, because that was kind of the

0:11:03.360 --> 0:11:05.880
<v Speaker 5>big thing, kind of keeping him in such a crucial

0:11:05.920 --> 0:11:09.360
<v Speaker 5>part of our bullpen. So let's say, so whatever type

0:11:09.360 --> 0:11:12.760
<v Speaker 5>of rotation I've I've hyped up Ben's Ben people. So

0:11:12.800 --> 0:11:15.040
<v Speaker 5>I'm gonna continue to do that in every episode until

0:11:15.040 --> 0:11:16.480
<v Speaker 5>we finally get him up here. Like I said, I

0:11:16.520 --> 0:11:18.480
<v Speaker 5>don't know if he's just a really fucking weird guy,

0:11:18.559 --> 0:11:20.840
<v Speaker 5>but at a certain point we need we need guys

0:11:20.840 --> 0:11:21.320
<v Speaker 5>in the bullpen.

0:11:21.400 --> 0:11:22.360
<v Speaker 1>We need different phases.

0:11:22.400 --> 0:11:25.600
<v Speaker 6>So I think what it comes down to, is what

0:11:25.720 --> 0:11:27.840
<v Speaker 6>you kind of alluded to the beginning to like, it's

0:11:27.920 --> 0:11:31.040
<v Speaker 6>it's most frustrating because they're scoring like five or six

0:11:31.160 --> 0:11:34.200
<v Speaker 6>runs a game, like they're they're playing winning baseball.

0:11:33.800 --> 0:11:35.000
<v Speaker 2>Even against like the Phillies.

0:11:35.000 --> 0:11:38.160
<v Speaker 6>Like, yes, they lost two of three, but their offense

0:11:38.160 --> 0:11:40.040
<v Speaker 6>should have had them winning at least two, if not

0:11:40.120 --> 0:11:42.479
<v Speaker 6>all three of them, right, like, Like, that's the frustrating

0:11:42.559 --> 0:11:46.079
<v Speaker 6>part of it. And I and I think you partially

0:11:46.160 --> 0:11:48.080
<v Speaker 6>knew that coming in the season. I don't think we

0:11:48.080 --> 0:11:50.880
<v Speaker 6>were blind to that necessarily, that the off or excuse me,

0:11:50.960 --> 0:11:53.080
<v Speaker 6>that the pitching would be the issue. The offense could

0:11:53.080 --> 0:11:56.880
<v Speaker 6>certainly carry the club at times, given the pedigree of

0:11:56.920 --> 0:12:00.400
<v Speaker 6>some of the names, but it is the break out

0:12:00.440 --> 0:12:02.400
<v Speaker 6>thing too on top of it. I think that was

0:12:02.480 --> 0:12:05.679
<v Speaker 6>maybe the thing I like the least about how this

0:12:05.720 --> 0:12:08.760
<v Speaker 6>group ended up coming together is because there's no swing

0:12:08.760 --> 0:12:12.120
<v Speaker 6>and miss anywhere outside of Grand Taylor and deming As

0:12:12.480 --> 0:12:16.280
<v Speaker 6>every now and again, it's that's the frustrating part. So

0:12:16.320 --> 0:12:18.720
<v Speaker 6>you're going to go through stretches like this. I think

0:12:18.760 --> 0:12:21.000
<v Speaker 6>that's what it ultimately comes down to. Yes, it's frustrating,

0:12:21.120 --> 0:12:24.000
<v Speaker 6>Yes it shouldn't be happening. Yes, there were other ways

0:12:24.000 --> 0:12:28.120
<v Speaker 6>to potentially prevent it. Sure, but you know you're going

0:12:28.160 --> 0:12:30.040
<v Speaker 6>to go through these stretches with this sort of pitching

0:12:30.080 --> 0:12:33.800
<v Speaker 6>staff that's built less as your swing and miss type

0:12:33.880 --> 0:12:37.680
<v Speaker 6>arsenals all the way from one through thirteen. Their ace

0:12:38.160 --> 0:12:41.040
<v Speaker 6>is We've been debating for weeks now, is this dude,

0:12:41.120 --> 0:12:44.440
<v Speaker 6>legit Davis Martin with six different pitches. That's just the

0:12:44.480 --> 0:12:46.400
<v Speaker 6>type of team this is right now, It's going to

0:12:46.520 --> 0:12:50.440
<v Speaker 6>lead to some pretty good highs and some pretty low lows, unfortunately,

0:12:50.480 --> 0:12:52.880
<v Speaker 6>as we've seen these past six games or so.

0:12:53.960 --> 0:12:56.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and I agree with you both, but that's also

0:12:56.040 --> 0:12:58.520
<v Speaker 4>something that I think could radically change between now and

0:12:58.840 --> 0:13:01.000
<v Speaker 4>maybe even as soon as all Like there's a chance

0:13:01.040 --> 0:13:05.480
<v Speaker 4>that in August all three of Hagen Smith, Tanner, McDougal

0:13:05.520 --> 0:13:07.720
<v Speaker 4>and Noah Schultzer in the rotation. I know Sheltz didn't

0:13:07.760 --> 0:13:10.160
<v Speaker 4>have the most you know, he wasn't like a huge

0:13:10.200 --> 0:13:12.960
<v Speaker 4>strikeout picture in his early stint in the majors, but

0:13:13.559 --> 0:13:15.560
<v Speaker 4>I wouldn't be surprised that that becomes who he is

0:13:15.600 --> 0:13:18.040
<v Speaker 4>more in the long term. Right So, yeah, right now,

0:13:18.040 --> 0:13:21.360
<v Speaker 4>it's tough because Davis Martin and Sean Burke, they're decent

0:13:21.400 --> 0:13:23.560
<v Speaker 4>pitchures having good seasons, but they're not like the big

0:13:23.600 --> 0:13:25.840
<v Speaker 4>strikeout guys, And I understand why the can text your

0:13:25.840 --> 0:13:28.439
<v Speaker 4>blowpen in the long run, but you might be having

0:13:28.760 --> 0:13:31.040
<v Speaker 4>the opposite problem with someone like Hagen Smith, who will

0:13:31.520 --> 0:13:33.280
<v Speaker 4>get the strikeouts to the cows come home, but I'll

0:13:33.280 --> 0:13:35.320
<v Speaker 4>also walk the bases loaded every now and then, so

0:13:35.880 --> 0:13:38.400
<v Speaker 4>there's a balance there. But I do think this rotation

0:13:38.480 --> 0:13:40.200
<v Speaker 4>could look so different by the end of the year

0:13:40.640 --> 0:13:44.000
<v Speaker 4>that someone like Davis, Martin or Burke might even it

0:13:44.080 --> 0:13:45.800
<v Speaker 4>might be like a breath of fresh air to have

0:13:45.840 --> 0:13:48.000
<v Speaker 4>their turn in the rotation and just have someone dependable

0:13:48.000 --> 0:13:50.240
<v Speaker 4>who can get five or six innings of you know,

0:13:50.280 --> 0:13:53.000
<v Speaker 4>two run ball in there with relatively low stress.

0:13:53.040 --> 0:13:53.680
<v Speaker 3>At the same time.

0:13:54.840 --> 0:13:57.439
<v Speaker 6>I think that's why we all call it, oh, they're three,

0:13:57.640 --> 0:13:59.600
<v Speaker 6>four or five starters in the long term, like that's

0:13:59.640 --> 0:14:02.200
<v Speaker 6>what those types of starters are supposed to be, exactly

0:14:02.240 --> 0:14:04.480
<v Speaker 6>what you just described. I don't think it's a bad thing.

0:14:05.480 --> 0:14:08.560
<v Speaker 6>It just becomes a bad thing when those guys have

0:14:08.600 --> 0:14:10.600
<v Speaker 6>to be your one and two in a rotation like that.

0:14:10.600 --> 0:14:12.240
<v Speaker 6>That's not what they're made to be, that's not what

0:14:12.280 --> 0:14:14.960
<v Speaker 6>they're meant to do. And yes, it will look dramatically

0:14:14.960 --> 0:14:17.960
<v Speaker 6>different with time to come. But at the same time,

0:14:18.040 --> 0:14:20.640
<v Speaker 6>until you get there, like I said, there are highs

0:14:20.640 --> 0:14:23.320
<v Speaker 6>and there are lows, and you're going to have to

0:14:23.320 --> 0:14:25.200
<v Speaker 6>weather them. But again it gets back to Nick, what

0:14:25.320 --> 0:14:27.880
<v Speaker 6>you and I said at the very beginning, like how

0:14:27.880 --> 0:14:31.040
<v Speaker 6>do you weigh against None of us expected this team

0:14:31.040 --> 0:14:34.960
<v Speaker 6>to be competitive in June with Okay, now that they're competitive,

0:14:35.360 --> 0:14:37.800
<v Speaker 6>why are X, Y and Z things happening? Like there's

0:14:37.800 --> 0:14:39.680
<v Speaker 6>a reason, there's a rational we can talk through, but

0:14:39.720 --> 0:14:43.080
<v Speaker 6>it's what level of frustration are you willing to let

0:14:43.160 --> 0:14:45.520
<v Speaker 6>yourself get to as you try and figure that all out?

0:14:46.920 --> 0:14:49.960
<v Speaker 5>Well, And I think there's a scenario where a lot

0:14:50.000 --> 0:14:52.560
<v Speaker 5>of the people who've discussed buying at the deadline, and

0:14:52.640 --> 0:14:55.760
<v Speaker 5>you know, like I've said the past couple episodes, that's

0:14:55.760 --> 0:14:58.520
<v Speaker 5>not really something I'm prepared to have any sort of

0:14:58.600 --> 0:15:01.960
<v Speaker 5>opinion on quite yet. Like it's maybe that seems like

0:15:01.960 --> 0:15:05.760
<v Speaker 5>I'm just dragging my toes here. But if we're going

0:15:05.840 --> 0:15:09.560
<v Speaker 5>to be in a situation where we think going in

0:15:09.640 --> 0:15:12.160
<v Speaker 5>trading for somebody at the deadline or trading for arms

0:15:12.160 --> 0:15:15.960
<v Speaker 5>at the deadline is to benefit the prospects we currently

0:15:15.960 --> 0:15:17.560
<v Speaker 5>have in this roster as far as trying to get

0:15:17.560 --> 0:15:21.240
<v Speaker 5>playoff experience, What does it hurt bringing up a guy

0:15:21.280 --> 0:15:24.239
<v Speaker 5>like Hagen Smith or bringing up a guy like McDougall

0:15:24.720 --> 0:15:27.520
<v Speaker 5>of getting them just high leverage experience of pitching in

0:15:27.600 --> 0:15:29.520
<v Speaker 5>ball games that matter, you know what I mean. I

0:15:29.560 --> 0:15:33.120
<v Speaker 5>feel like it's kind of a similar similar what you're

0:15:33.120 --> 0:15:36.200
<v Speaker 5>trying to grasp here. But instead of sending these guys

0:15:36.200 --> 0:15:38.000
<v Speaker 5>out before we get a chance to see him at

0:15:38.040 --> 0:15:41.160
<v Speaker 5>a major league level, you know, why don't we try

0:15:41.200 --> 0:15:43.240
<v Speaker 5>to get them onto the major league roster sooner rather

0:15:43.280 --> 0:15:45.480
<v Speaker 5>than later. I mean, Hagen Smith is a tough one

0:15:45.560 --> 0:15:48.560
<v Speaker 5>just because of the issues he's had with walks, But

0:15:48.800 --> 0:15:51.200
<v Speaker 5>over the course of his last couple starts, he's cleaned

0:15:51.200 --> 0:15:53.000
<v Speaker 5>that up a lot more and he's I believe his

0:15:53.080 --> 0:15:55.640
<v Speaker 5>last starready had it was uh I think it was

0:15:55.720 --> 0:15:57.800
<v Speaker 5>nine strikeouts and he ended up having one walk in

0:15:57.840 --> 0:15:58.240
<v Speaker 5>that game.

0:15:58.280 --> 0:15:59.600
<v Speaker 1>And you gotta be able to find.

0:15:59.480 --> 0:16:01.600
<v Speaker 5>A time where where do you want to continue to

0:16:01.640 --> 0:16:03.840
<v Speaker 5>just let him build on that, you know, until the

0:16:03.920 --> 0:16:05.560
<v Speaker 5>end of time, or do we want to just like

0:16:05.600 --> 0:16:07.360
<v Speaker 5>try to make an aggressive move here with one of

0:16:07.360 --> 0:16:09.480
<v Speaker 5>our one of our prospects and try to see if

0:16:09.520 --> 0:16:11.240
<v Speaker 5>he can do it at the major league level. I mean,

0:16:11.280 --> 0:16:13.160
<v Speaker 5>it's not like we're gonna have any shortage of options

0:16:13.160 --> 0:16:14.960
<v Speaker 5>with him, So why not take a shot at something

0:16:15.040 --> 0:16:18.480
<v Speaker 5>like that? And I think that that should have been

0:16:18.480 --> 0:16:20.400
<v Speaker 5>the mindset with Noah Schultz, with how hot he's with

0:16:20.480 --> 0:16:22.520
<v Speaker 5>how hot he started in Charlotte in the first place.

0:16:22.600 --> 0:16:24.440
<v Speaker 5>You know, so if you're gonna kind of have that

0:16:24.520 --> 0:16:26.600
<v Speaker 5>mindset and you want to try to get new guys

0:16:26.640 --> 0:16:29.160
<v Speaker 5>up into this rotation because we need new faces, there's

0:16:29.200 --> 0:16:31.760
<v Speaker 5>no ifans or boughts about it, especially in the bullpen.

0:16:32.640 --> 0:16:34.400
<v Speaker 1>Why not try to get him up here, Just try

0:16:34.400 --> 0:16:34.760
<v Speaker 1>to get.

0:16:34.640 --> 0:16:37.840
<v Speaker 5>Him experience and see if if in a couple of

0:16:37.880 --> 0:16:41.200
<v Speaker 5>weeks we're at the deadline and we're sure either sure

0:16:41.240 --> 0:16:43.840
<v Speaker 5>they're not ready or there's something there where they could

0:16:43.920 --> 0:16:46.320
<v Speaker 5>be ready here soon and they're moving in the right

0:16:46.320 --> 0:16:49.000
<v Speaker 5>direction before we decided to make a move with the deadline,

0:16:49.000 --> 0:16:50.040
<v Speaker 5>you know, kind of know what I'm saying.

0:16:51.880 --> 0:16:53.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it makes sense. Again, it's just.

0:16:55.400 --> 0:16:57.600
<v Speaker 6>You have you have to be you have to commit

0:16:57.640 --> 0:16:59.920
<v Speaker 6>to that right, you have to commit to shuffling things up,

0:17:00.560 --> 0:17:03.600
<v Speaker 6>and now kind of presents an okay time to do it.

0:17:03.720 --> 0:17:06.840
<v Speaker 6>Like they're not playing great baseball. The bullpen has not

0:17:06.920 --> 0:17:08.960
<v Speaker 6>looked great. There's only so much you can do about

0:17:08.960 --> 0:17:13.720
<v Speaker 6>stunning rotation and its injuries and you know, figuring guys

0:17:13.720 --> 0:17:17.320
<v Speaker 6>out from that perspective, but only these bullpen names.

0:17:17.320 --> 0:17:18.600
<v Speaker 2>You need to continue to turn them.

0:17:18.680 --> 0:17:20.679
<v Speaker 6>If Tyler Davis isn't working out anymore, you've got to

0:17:20.680 --> 0:17:22.880
<v Speaker 6>move on like that. That's just how this is going

0:17:22.920 --> 0:17:24.800
<v Speaker 6>to have to be at this point.

0:17:25.800 --> 0:17:29.080
<v Speaker 5>Absolutely, I mean, kind of getting away from pitching a

0:17:29.080 --> 0:17:30.960
<v Speaker 5>little bit, because honestly, we could probably do an entire

0:17:31.000 --> 0:17:33.960
<v Speaker 5>episode just based on, you know, breaking down how bad

0:17:34.040 --> 0:17:36.760
<v Speaker 5>every single every single pitcher in the rotate or in

0:17:36.880 --> 0:17:40.040
<v Speaker 5>the bullpen's been. I mean, I just I guess I'm

0:17:40.080 --> 0:17:41.840
<v Speaker 5>just glad when I don't have to see Jordan Hicks

0:17:41.840 --> 0:17:44.920
<v Speaker 5>and just get constantly frustrated with, oh my god, look

0:17:44.960 --> 0:17:47.720
<v Speaker 5>how well it pitch moves and look how fucking much

0:17:47.720 --> 0:17:48.840
<v Speaker 5>he misses the strike zone.

0:17:48.960 --> 0:17:53.479
<v Speaker 1>That doesn't look good. Guy that people have been talking about.

0:17:53.800 --> 0:17:55.679
<v Speaker 5>And this kind of goes into people who have stepped

0:17:55.760 --> 0:18:00.879
<v Speaker 5>up in the absence of Mutaka Murakamila Montgomery. He's on

0:18:00.920 --> 0:18:04.159
<v Speaker 5>a on a colder streak right now. I said it

0:18:04.200 --> 0:18:05.720
<v Speaker 5>kind of at the top of the episode. That I

0:18:05.720 --> 0:18:08.760
<v Speaker 5>think he has stepped in and kind of like kept

0:18:09.000 --> 0:18:12.280
<v Speaker 5>power in the lineup. I believe he homered in Philly

0:18:12.320 --> 0:18:15.159
<v Speaker 5>on Saturday. I want to say I think I was

0:18:15.200 --> 0:18:19.000
<v Speaker 5>actually a back to back with Gonzalez. I'm not sure.

0:18:19.040 --> 0:18:21.520
<v Speaker 5>I was at Banana BA on Saturday, so I was

0:18:21.560 --> 0:18:23.440
<v Speaker 5>just kind of getting stuff on the on the fly

0:18:23.560 --> 0:18:28.760
<v Speaker 5>from there. But Colson just has a really bad time

0:18:28.800 --> 0:18:31.919
<v Speaker 5>to get cold, of all times. But it had to

0:18:31.960 --> 0:18:33.919
<v Speaker 5>have been. It was kind of an inevitability. You know,

0:18:34.000 --> 0:18:36.240
<v Speaker 5>col S Montgomery wasn't gonna stay hot all season. He's

0:18:36.280 --> 0:18:38.760
<v Speaker 5>gonna have cold streaks. He's still a very young baseball player.

0:18:40.440 --> 0:18:44.680
<v Speaker 5>I guess how worried and Nick, I'll let you jump

0:18:44.720 --> 0:18:47.680
<v Speaker 5>right into this. How worried are you about Cols Montgomery

0:18:47.800 --> 0:18:50.960
<v Speaker 5>right now? Is there something you you think this is

0:18:51.000 --> 0:18:52.640
<v Speaker 5>something that's going to be enormed? Do you think he's

0:18:52.680 --> 0:18:54.399
<v Speaker 5>just on a cold streak? Like, where where are we

0:18:54.440 --> 0:18:56.720
<v Speaker 5>at with this lineup right now? With Cols Montgomery kind

0:18:56.720 --> 0:18:58.640
<v Speaker 5>of being our power bat in the middle.

0:18:58.440 --> 0:19:01.120
<v Speaker 3>Of it, and worried at all about him?

0:19:01.400 --> 0:19:04.080
<v Speaker 4>I do think that on this the ideal version of

0:19:04.119 --> 0:19:05.960
<v Speaker 4>the twenty twenty six wide socks. I do think he

0:19:06.040 --> 0:19:09.240
<v Speaker 4>profiles more as like a fifth or six hitter than

0:19:09.280 --> 0:19:11.000
<v Speaker 4>like the three or four guys. Maybe that's where some

0:19:11.000 --> 0:19:12.920
<v Speaker 4>of the issue comes in, Like in a perfect world,

0:19:13.000 --> 0:19:15.040
<v Speaker 4>Kyle's heal would be somewhere one through four, and that

0:19:15.160 --> 0:19:18.080
<v Speaker 4>might bum Montgomery down, which is in my opinion, But

0:19:19.119 --> 0:19:21.000
<v Speaker 4>this is kind of just who he is, right. I

0:19:21.240 --> 0:19:23.639
<v Speaker 4>feel like we've all accepted that he as of you know,

0:19:23.880 --> 0:19:28.639
<v Speaker 4>Mer two, he's an extremely valuable defensive shortstop who on

0:19:28.720 --> 0:19:31.600
<v Speaker 4>offense will hit you know, I mean what he has

0:19:31.600 --> 0:19:33.879
<v Speaker 4>like thirty seven or something career home runs already. He

0:19:33.920 --> 0:19:35.800
<v Speaker 4>is not even a one hundred sixty two games, So

0:19:35.840 --> 0:19:37.600
<v Speaker 4>clearly we kind of know who he is. And he

0:19:37.920 --> 0:19:40.080
<v Speaker 4>had an interview a month or so ago where he

0:19:40.080 --> 0:19:42.119
<v Speaker 4>talked about his hitting approach, and I thought it was interesting,

0:19:42.160 --> 0:19:44.960
<v Speaker 4>because every hitter is going to have some sort of

0:19:45.000 --> 0:19:47.640
<v Speaker 4>a approach at the play, general approach at to play,

0:19:47.720 --> 0:19:50.280
<v Speaker 4>like right, whether it's sitting on a specific pitch like

0:19:50.320 --> 0:19:54.240
<v Speaker 4>sitting fastball, sitting on a specific location, maybe some mix

0:19:54.280 --> 0:19:56.240
<v Speaker 4>of both. He kind of made it clear in the

0:19:56.240 --> 0:19:59.120
<v Speaker 4>interview that he he adjusts by the pitcher, but he's

0:19:59.119 --> 0:20:02.040
<v Speaker 4>basically looking in particular spot and for a particular pitch

0:20:02.080 --> 0:20:05.040
<v Speaker 4>depending on the situation, and that would explain why he

0:20:05.040 --> 0:20:06.560
<v Speaker 4>has a lot of home runs, but also flame white

0:20:06.560 --> 0:20:09.040
<v Speaker 4>swings and missus a louder might strike out looking sometimes.

0:20:09.080 --> 0:20:11.960
<v Speaker 4>So it's a frustrating approach when it's not working well,

0:20:12.200 --> 0:20:14.280
<v Speaker 4>when you have a runner on third and then one

0:20:14.320 --> 0:20:16.119
<v Speaker 4>out and you need you know, a sack fly or

0:20:16.240 --> 0:20:17.720
<v Speaker 4>a ground out or something. You just don't want to

0:20:17.720 --> 0:20:21.000
<v Speaker 4>strike out. Essentially, that's where it's frustrating, because you want

0:20:21.080 --> 0:20:23.080
<v Speaker 4>him to just put the ball in play, which, to

0:20:23.160 --> 0:20:25.639
<v Speaker 4>his credit, he had a couple in the Philadelphia series

0:20:25.640 --> 0:20:27.320
<v Speaker 4>where he had like an RBI single or you know,

0:20:27.400 --> 0:20:29.680
<v Speaker 4>advanced to runner that kind of thing. So I get

0:20:29.680 --> 0:20:32.480
<v Speaker 4>why people are frustrated with him because you see him,

0:20:32.560 --> 0:20:34.600
<v Speaker 4>you know, not come through in those moments. But I

0:20:34.600 --> 0:20:36.520
<v Speaker 4>don't get why anyone will be worried about his future

0:20:36.600 --> 0:20:38.239
<v Speaker 4>or anything like that. But he's still having a very

0:20:38.280 --> 0:20:40.399
<v Speaker 4>good season and this is kind of.

0:20:40.359 --> 0:20:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Who he is.

0:20:40.760 --> 0:20:40.879
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:20:40.880 --> 0:20:43.000
<v Speaker 4>If you're a shortstop and you're going to hit you know,

0:20:43.040 --> 0:20:45.880
<v Speaker 4>a forty plus home run pace per season with great defense,

0:20:45.960 --> 0:20:48.239
<v Speaker 4>I'm not going to say anything negative about you. Like

0:20:48.280 --> 0:20:50.360
<v Speaker 4>that's insanely valuable, right.

0:20:51.640 --> 0:20:53.399
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, it was quite the Banner Week for some of

0:20:53.440 --> 0:20:55.880
<v Speaker 6>the Montgomery headlines, and I'll kind of leave it at

0:20:55.960 --> 0:20:58.200
<v Speaker 6>that in terms of how in depth like O. But

0:20:58.320 --> 0:21:01.119
<v Speaker 6>that's when you say, like, we've all accepted that. Yeah,

0:21:01.240 --> 0:21:03.440
<v Speaker 6>we have, and I think we've talked about it before,

0:21:03.480 --> 0:21:07.600
<v Speaker 6>but I assume the larger White Sox community has not.

0:21:08.359 --> 0:21:12.120
<v Speaker 6>And that's where this comes in, where where I get

0:21:12.200 --> 0:21:16.080
<v Speaker 6>some of the frustrations. He's pretty brutal. I'm pretty brutal.

0:21:16.119 --> 0:21:19.399
<v Speaker 6>Is not fair. He has about a seven hundred career

0:21:19.400 --> 0:21:23.639
<v Speaker 6>ops with runners in scoring position. That's okay, but I

0:21:23.640 --> 0:21:26.080
<v Speaker 6>can understand why, Hey, if he's going to hit four

0:21:26.160 --> 0:21:27.760
<v Speaker 6>in a lineup, you'd want that to be better. I

0:21:28.119 --> 0:21:30.840
<v Speaker 6>do get where people are coming from from that standpoint.

0:21:31.800 --> 0:21:33.680
<v Speaker 6>You knew he was going to be a high strikeout guy.

0:21:33.880 --> 0:21:37.240
<v Speaker 6>You knew he was gonna walk at a pretty good clip.

0:21:37.280 --> 0:21:40.879
<v Speaker 6>Nothing crazy. I never like any of the body language

0:21:40.880 --> 0:21:43.920
<v Speaker 6>shit that really bothers me. I'm never a big fan

0:21:44.000 --> 0:21:47.560
<v Speaker 6>of that, but like parts of it I get, but

0:21:47.600 --> 0:21:49.240
<v Speaker 6>also parts of it I don't get because I'm like,

0:21:49.840 --> 0:21:53.640
<v Speaker 6>you know, what the profile is, right, Like theoretically, if

0:21:53.640 --> 0:21:56.320
<v Speaker 6>he walked more, if he hit a little bit more

0:21:56.720 --> 0:21:58.200
<v Speaker 6>average for a little bit more average.

0:21:58.200 --> 0:22:00.560
<v Speaker 2>Sure, like, yes, but that's not.

0:22:00.520 --> 0:22:02.879
<v Speaker 6>The type of player that you have here, which you

0:22:02.920 --> 0:22:06.640
<v Speaker 6>have is still a very valuable player who does need

0:22:06.680 --> 0:22:09.160
<v Speaker 6>to deliver more with guys on base. I'm not disagreeing

0:22:09.200 --> 0:22:14.080
<v Speaker 6>with that concept, but I feel like maybe that particular

0:22:14.240 --> 0:22:18.399
<v Speaker 6>point got taken and then everyone was like, well, I

0:22:18.440 --> 0:22:21.399
<v Speaker 6>also have this complaint or that complaint. It's like, no, like,

0:22:21.720 --> 0:22:25.520
<v Speaker 6>we've taken one valid complaint about Rundisson scoring position, and

0:22:25.560 --> 0:22:27.840
<v Speaker 6>we've now blown this up to be anything I don't

0:22:27.880 --> 0:22:30.280
<v Speaker 6>like about the current iteration of the team or Cools

0:22:30.400 --> 0:22:31.480
<v Speaker 6>Montgomery or things like that.

0:22:31.760 --> 0:22:34.840
<v Speaker 2>No, you took it a step too far there. So

0:22:35.600 --> 0:22:35.919
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:22:36.080 --> 0:22:38.840
<v Speaker 6>It worries not the thing maybe you'd like to see.

0:22:39.119 --> 0:22:41.440
<v Speaker 6>We've talked about this so many times. You'd like to

0:22:41.480 --> 0:22:45.480
<v Speaker 6>see someone of those backside base hits right, just staying

0:22:45.520 --> 0:22:48.119
<v Speaker 6>a little bit more on the ball, through the ball,

0:22:48.200 --> 0:22:54.000
<v Speaker 6>through contact, right, Like those things that aren't exactly sexy

0:22:54.440 --> 0:22:57.040
<v Speaker 6>at the end of the day, but they play to

0:22:57.160 --> 0:22:59.240
<v Speaker 6>his profile a little bit better in terms of you

0:22:59.240 --> 0:23:00.640
<v Speaker 6>can live it a little bit more swing and miss

0:23:00.680 --> 0:23:05.120
<v Speaker 6>when you do those two. But I don't know, it's

0:23:05.200 --> 0:23:08.440
<v Speaker 6>fun to have these conversations again because like, clearly people

0:23:08.440 --> 0:23:15.800
<v Speaker 6>are paying attention, but you're taking these micro I guess

0:23:15.800 --> 0:23:18.159
<v Speaker 6>I'll say small sample sizes is basically what I was

0:23:18.160 --> 0:23:19.840
<v Speaker 6>trying to say. You're taking these week to week small

0:23:19.880 --> 0:23:22.280
<v Speaker 6>sample size and you're like, he's great, he sucks. He's great,

0:23:22.320 --> 0:23:26.160
<v Speaker 6>he sucks, And that's probably what his career is going

0:23:26.200 --> 0:23:27.600
<v Speaker 6>to be based on what we've seen so far.

0:23:28.960 --> 0:23:32.439
<v Speaker 5>So I'm not trying to do huge callback here, but

0:23:33.040 --> 0:23:36.080
<v Speaker 5>I do remember us having a discussion last year about

0:23:36.880 --> 0:23:39.560
<v Speaker 5>Coles Montgomery when he was kind of having this power surge,

0:23:40.000 --> 0:23:42.720
<v Speaker 5>specifically caused by the inhabit the Chicago Cubs, and again,

0:23:42.800 --> 0:23:46.760
<v Speaker 5>we all thank him for that, but when he was

0:23:46.800 --> 0:23:49.320
<v Speaker 5>starting to really match the baseball we were kind of,

0:23:49.560 --> 0:23:51.920
<v Speaker 5>we're kind of taking aback because that wasn't necessarily part

0:23:51.920 --> 0:23:53.560
<v Speaker 5>of his profile, but it was something that he was

0:23:53.600 --> 0:23:55.679
<v Speaker 5>doing really well. So the White Sox continued to have

0:23:55.760 --> 0:23:58.720
<v Speaker 5>him just try to hit white Tower power type of home.

0:23:58.640 --> 0:23:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Runs, you know what I mean.

0:24:00.359 --> 0:24:03.400
<v Speaker 5>And it's something that up to this points worked insanely well.

0:24:04.040 --> 0:24:07.000
<v Speaker 5>It's something that can continue to work insanely while moving forward,

0:24:07.359 --> 0:24:11.400
<v Speaker 5>but it's it kind of people shouldn't have been convinced

0:24:11.400 --> 0:24:14.560
<v Speaker 5>that Colson Montgomery was a complete player just by the

0:24:14.640 --> 0:24:16.040
<v Speaker 5>end of last year, you know what I mean.

0:24:16.080 --> 0:24:16.720
<v Speaker 1>And he was not a.

0:24:16.720 --> 0:24:20.040
<v Speaker 5>Complete complete player just because he continued to have a

0:24:20.040 --> 0:24:23.000
<v Speaker 5>pretty good start to this season. He's still a guy

0:24:23.000 --> 0:24:25.640
<v Speaker 5>that's developing and learning who he is as a baseball player,

0:24:25.720 --> 0:24:29.520
<v Speaker 5>especially in the batter's box. I had to pull this up,

0:24:30.160 --> 0:24:31.520
<v Speaker 5>So I did pull this up on the fly. But

0:24:31.560 --> 0:24:35.800
<v Speaker 5>this is something I was looking at on Thursday. Colson

0:24:35.840 --> 0:24:38.880
<v Speaker 5>Montgomery this season. It actually comes down to a very

0:24:38.880 --> 0:24:42.159
<v Speaker 5>simple thing. He's struggling against a slider and he was

0:24:42.560 --> 0:24:46.280
<v Speaker 5>destroying sliders last year. I'm not entirely sure if that

0:24:46.320 --> 0:24:48.520
<v Speaker 5>comes with his approach or what he's being asked to

0:24:48.520 --> 0:24:51.680
<v Speaker 5>do on an at bat to at that basis, I

0:24:51.760 --> 0:24:53.439
<v Speaker 5>don't know if he's being asked to be more of

0:24:53.480 --> 0:24:55.520
<v Speaker 5>a power beat and trying to focus more on just

0:24:55.560 --> 0:24:58.080
<v Speaker 5>getting fastballs and trying to crush him when he's seeing that.

0:24:58.440 --> 0:25:00.719
<v Speaker 5>I don't know what that coaching side it looks like.

0:25:01.160 --> 0:25:04.160
<v Speaker 5>But let's just take a comparison here. So last season

0:25:04.520 --> 0:25:07.960
<v Speaker 5>against sliders, Colson Montgomery was hitting three forty five and

0:25:08.000 --> 0:25:11.960
<v Speaker 5>slugging ninety sixty six. This season, he's hitting one fifty

0:25:12.000 --> 0:25:15.040
<v Speaker 5>four and slugging four to twenty three. And this isn't

0:25:15.080 --> 0:25:18.600
<v Speaker 5>some like, oh small sample size compared to big sample size.

0:25:18.760 --> 0:25:21.720
<v Speaker 5>He's faced one hundred nineteen sliders this season. He faced

0:25:21.720 --> 0:25:25.520
<v Speaker 5>one hundred and forty sliders last season. Now, I can't

0:25:25.520 --> 0:25:28.000
<v Speaker 5>say for sure who these sliders are being thrown by,

0:25:28.040 --> 0:25:30.600
<v Speaker 5>if they're being thrown by lefty arms or righty arms.

0:25:30.840 --> 0:25:34.040
<v Speaker 5>But what I'm kind of seeing here is based on

0:25:34.119 --> 0:25:35.919
<v Speaker 5>what his approach is at the plate and kind of

0:25:35.960 --> 0:25:38.399
<v Speaker 5>seeing the pitches that he's probably being told to focus

0:25:38.440 --> 0:25:42.679
<v Speaker 5>on or you know, he's focusing on. Personally, it's turning

0:25:42.680 --> 0:25:46.960
<v Speaker 5>into him just not hitting sliders very well. Because he's

0:25:47.000 --> 0:25:50.080
<v Speaker 5>done it very well in the past. I'm gonna give

0:25:50.160 --> 0:25:52.480
<v Speaker 5>him the benefit of the doubt that Colson Montgomery can

0:25:52.520 --> 0:25:55.800
<v Speaker 5>crush some sliders, but right now this season, it's not

0:25:55.840 --> 0:25:59.280
<v Speaker 5>currently happening. And kind of where I've been with Colson

0:25:59.320 --> 0:26:01.159
<v Speaker 5>this season is is you know, waiting for him to

0:26:01.160 --> 0:26:03.200
<v Speaker 5>take that next step of being a more complete hitter

0:26:03.240 --> 0:26:04.840
<v Speaker 5>in the in the in the box.

0:26:05.000 --> 0:26:05.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that.

0:26:05.520 --> 0:26:08.720
<v Speaker 5>Explains a lot of it, is he's not He's really

0:26:08.760 --> 0:26:11.480
<v Speaker 5>struggling at the slider right now, and that's something that's

0:26:11.480 --> 0:26:13.679
<v Speaker 5>gonna have to be a point of emphasis for and

0:26:13.720 --> 0:26:14.399
<v Speaker 5>moving forward.

0:26:15.840 --> 0:26:18.040
<v Speaker 6>One thing I think about too when we have this conversation,

0:26:18.080 --> 0:26:22.040
<v Speaker 6>completely unrelated but kind of related. It's why I think,

0:26:22.080 --> 0:26:24.440
<v Speaker 6>and maybe I'm still wrong, why I think Kyle Teal

0:26:24.480 --> 0:26:29.520
<v Speaker 6>will be the more complete hitter of this group. It's

0:26:29.520 --> 0:26:32.440
<v Speaker 6>still probably my personal favorite. Vargas has come a long

0:26:32.480 --> 0:26:34.199
<v Speaker 6>way since I said that early in this season, so

0:26:34.200 --> 0:26:37.240
<v Speaker 6>I might have to play second fiddle to him when

0:26:37.520 --> 0:26:40.720
<v Speaker 6>making that country. But I think initially the conversation was

0:26:42.040 --> 0:26:45.600
<v Speaker 6>Teal versus Montcomer, and I think that's still why Teal

0:26:45.920 --> 0:26:48.399
<v Speaker 6>might just I think, be better long term. It's not

0:26:48.440 --> 0:26:50.119
<v Speaker 6>that Montgomery is bad. It's not that he doesn't have

0:26:50.160 --> 0:26:53.480
<v Speaker 6>a very very, very very high ceiling. It's just more

0:26:53.520 --> 0:26:56.200
<v Speaker 6>so the well rounded piece of it. To me, to hey,

0:26:56.359 --> 0:26:58.160
<v Speaker 6>to your point, Duke, if he starts to hit breaking

0:26:58.160 --> 0:27:00.720
<v Speaker 6>balls a little bit better, or he starts to cut

0:27:00.760 --> 0:27:02.560
<v Speaker 6>down on the striker right just a bit, we're talking

0:27:02.680 --> 0:27:06.640
<v Speaker 6>twenty five percent instead of thirty percent, Like those are

0:27:06.680 --> 0:27:09.480
<v Speaker 6>how you become a more complete hitter. I mean, at

0:27:09.480 --> 0:27:10.720
<v Speaker 6>the end of the day, he's still not even a

0:27:10.800 --> 0:27:12.720
<v Speaker 6>year in a big league service time, like he's got

0:27:13.359 --> 0:27:15.960
<v Speaker 6>half of last year and half of almost half of

0:27:16.000 --> 0:27:18.360
<v Speaker 6>this year, so we're almost coming up on a year,

0:27:18.400 --> 0:27:20.479
<v Speaker 6>which is crazy to say about a guy who's had

0:27:20.520 --> 0:27:23.240
<v Speaker 6>as much time or not had as much time, but

0:27:23.400 --> 0:27:26.040
<v Speaker 6>had as much conversations given the amount of time he's

0:27:26.040 --> 0:27:26.960
<v Speaker 6>had in the big leagues.

0:27:27.960 --> 0:27:28.480
<v Speaker 2>So I don't know.

0:27:28.680 --> 0:27:30.760
<v Speaker 6>Again I go, I go back and forth on it all,

0:27:30.800 --> 0:27:39.440
<v Speaker 6>but I think I know the conversations around it are overblown.

0:27:39.640 --> 0:27:41.520
<v Speaker 6>What I go back and forth on is like, what's

0:27:41.560 --> 0:27:45.480
<v Speaker 6>the final product of version of Colson Montgomery? And if

0:27:45.520 --> 0:27:48.240
<v Speaker 6>it is this, you're gonna have to be okay with it?

0:27:48.280 --> 0:27:51.160
<v Speaker 6>Is kind of how I'm viewing it right now, because

0:27:51.160 --> 0:27:54.240
<v Speaker 6>it's still a very, very very valuable baseball player just

0:27:54.520 --> 0:27:56.640
<v Speaker 6>defense alone, plus what power.

0:27:56.359 --> 0:27:56.840
<v Speaker 3>He gives you.

0:27:58.000 --> 0:28:00.919
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean he's like, like you said, it's been

0:28:00.920 --> 0:28:04.040
<v Speaker 4>almost a year now and a thick strikeout rate comment

0:28:04.119 --> 0:28:06.560
<v Speaker 4>is valid for me, Like, what's the end product going

0:28:06.600 --> 0:28:07.200
<v Speaker 4>to look?

0:28:07.280 --> 0:28:07.399
<v Speaker 1>Like?

0:28:07.760 --> 0:28:10.119
<v Speaker 4>I would be totally fine if it's this current version

0:28:10.160 --> 0:28:13.240
<v Speaker 4>of him. Ideally with a couple more personage points toat

0:28:13.280 --> 0:28:15.320
<v Speaker 4>hunder the walk rate, like a low double legit walk

0:28:15.359 --> 0:28:17.280
<v Speaker 4>rate would be better for him. Maybe that comes like

0:28:17.280 --> 0:28:20.400
<v Speaker 4>with Duke was saying from better identifying the slider and

0:28:20.720 --> 0:28:23.000
<v Speaker 4>laying off when it's coming down and in on him that.

0:28:23.000 --> 0:28:23.440
<v Speaker 3>Kind of thing.

0:28:23.520 --> 0:28:27.000
<v Speaker 4>But overall, we're still talking about a shortstop who, as

0:28:27.040 --> 0:28:29.800
<v Speaker 4>I just chat, his fifth in baseball and war among

0:28:29.880 --> 0:28:34.280
<v Speaker 4>shortstops for on Fangraphs, So like we're really I understand

0:28:34.280 --> 0:28:37.240
<v Speaker 4>why we're talking about it, but it's like, he's a

0:28:37.240 --> 0:28:40.760
<v Speaker 4>great player, So I'm not upset at all by the performance.

0:28:40.760 --> 0:28:43.360
<v Speaker 4>And again I can accept that he's gonna have frustrating

0:28:43.400 --> 0:28:45.400
<v Speaker 4>at bats. It's just the kind of profile that he is.

0:28:45.640 --> 0:28:47.320
<v Speaker 4>And maybe that's why it's unfair that he's the clean

0:28:47.360 --> 0:28:49.240
<v Speaker 4>up pinner. Maybe that's not his role or shouldn't be

0:28:49.280 --> 0:28:51.320
<v Speaker 4>his role, And that's okay because he's still a great player.

0:28:51.400 --> 0:28:55.640
<v Speaker 4>So I think we've we've talked about Colson from such

0:28:55.640 --> 0:28:58.000
<v Speaker 4>a negative lench, like negative framing, even though I know

0:28:58.040 --> 0:29:00.320
<v Speaker 4>the three of us all agree that he's he's pretty great.

0:29:00.520 --> 0:29:04.040
<v Speaker 3>So it's just been strange to see the vitriol for him.

0:29:04.080 --> 0:29:07.160
<v Speaker 6>I guess it is, and I maybe it is because

0:29:07.160 --> 0:29:08.920
<v Speaker 6>of the role he has to play right now with

0:29:09.040 --> 0:29:13.920
<v Speaker 6>mooning out, and you know, this team probably still missing

0:29:14.000 --> 0:29:17.600
<v Speaker 6>one more true middle of the lineup threat like maybe

0:29:17.600 --> 0:29:20.840
<v Speaker 6>he is a sixth in the order hitter instead of

0:29:20.840 --> 0:29:25.720
<v Speaker 6>a four that's fine, but this this team's missing two

0:29:25.760 --> 0:29:28.040
<v Speaker 6>bats right now, one is hurt or both. I heard

0:29:28.640 --> 0:29:34.560
<v Speaker 6>Marikami and Teal, So it's like, does he still hit three, four, five,

0:29:35.360 --> 0:29:36.920
<v Speaker 6>and the best versions of this lineup?

0:29:36.920 --> 0:29:37.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:29:37.240 --> 0:29:40.600
<v Speaker 2>Maybe he does hit six and maybe that changes the conversation.

0:29:40.680 --> 0:29:43.760
<v Speaker 6>Again, I don't know. We've We've done this with hitters

0:29:43.800 --> 0:29:46.200
<v Speaker 6>in the past too. I forget who we've talked. It's

0:29:46.240 --> 0:29:49.440
<v Speaker 6>like maybe Moncata is one of them, or like we've

0:29:49.480 --> 0:29:52.960
<v Speaker 6>gone through so many hitters. It's like, for some reason

0:29:53.320 --> 0:29:55.440
<v Speaker 6>and not for some reason, I kind of get it.

0:29:55.800 --> 0:29:58.280
<v Speaker 6>There's these conversations about based on where this guy is

0:29:58.320 --> 0:30:02.920
<v Speaker 6>hitting in the lineup, the expectations and the conversations around

0:30:02.920 --> 0:30:05.600
<v Speaker 6>this player change versus just, hey, taking him as a

0:30:05.680 --> 0:30:07.720
<v Speaker 6>two and a half win ball player through two months

0:30:07.720 --> 0:30:10.800
<v Speaker 6>of the season and just viewing it from that lens.

0:30:11.520 --> 0:30:14.800
<v Speaker 6>I think again, with the conversations around like runners and

0:30:14.840 --> 0:30:17.440
<v Speaker 6>scoring position, things like that, I think if everyone views

0:30:17.480 --> 0:30:19.200
<v Speaker 6>him through the lens of a four hitter or a

0:30:19.200 --> 0:30:22.840
<v Speaker 6>three hitter, maybe that's how the conversations happen. But again,

0:30:22.920 --> 0:30:25.760
<v Speaker 6>it's what does this team look like at full strength

0:30:25.800 --> 0:30:29.320
<v Speaker 6>when they're really actually entering a season planning to compete.

0:30:29.640 --> 0:30:33.320
<v Speaker 6>If he's still hitting four, okay, let's have that conversation then.

0:30:33.880 --> 0:30:37.800
<v Speaker 6>But if not, like, how much does it matter?

0:30:37.920 --> 0:30:41.880
<v Speaker 5>Is what it comes down to, I think, And honestly,

0:30:41.920 --> 0:30:44.240
<v Speaker 5>I think having this conversation is a really good problem

0:30:44.280 --> 0:30:48.000
<v Speaker 5>to have. I mean, it shows that Colson's shown heights

0:30:48.200 --> 0:30:51.160
<v Speaker 5>where these expectations are starting to like kind of come

0:30:51.200 --> 0:30:54.719
<v Speaker 5>across within the fan base, you know. I mean there

0:30:54.720 --> 0:30:56.520
<v Speaker 5>were discussions when he was kind of on his hot

0:30:56.520 --> 0:30:59.120
<v Speaker 5>streak there last month of him being one of the

0:30:59.120 --> 0:31:00.440
<v Speaker 5>best short steps baseball.

0:31:00.520 --> 0:31:02.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, and that is part of it too.

0:31:02.120 --> 0:31:06.200
<v Speaker 5>He plays such a premier position, you know, but people

0:31:06.240 --> 0:31:08.480
<v Speaker 5>have to kind of temper their expectations. And remember, like

0:31:08.800 --> 0:31:11.000
<v Speaker 5>we didn't sign we didn't sign him as a twenty

0:31:11.040 --> 0:31:14.240
<v Speaker 5>eight year old established shortstop that we're paying three hundred

0:31:14.240 --> 0:31:18.200
<v Speaker 5>million dollars to. This is a guy who at points

0:31:18.280 --> 0:31:20.160
<v Speaker 5>last year we're scared that he was going to be

0:31:20.200 --> 0:31:22.600
<v Speaker 5>able to hit major league in Major League baseball at all.

0:31:22.880 --> 0:31:26.880
<v Speaker 5>You know, like every people having some meltdowns. My boy,

0:31:26.920 --> 0:31:30.480
<v Speaker 5>aj Persinski's one of them. But you know, he'd probably

0:31:30.520 --> 0:31:32.720
<v Speaker 5>be the first to tell you with how Colson's kind

0:31:32.720 --> 0:31:37.200
<v Speaker 5>of grown, But it's it's a situation where you gotta

0:31:37.200 --> 0:31:40.400
<v Speaker 5>temper your expectations. Understand that with where we are as

0:31:40.440 --> 0:31:43.000
<v Speaker 5>an organization right now, we still have a lot of

0:31:43.040 --> 0:31:45.760
<v Speaker 5>guys that are trying to find their long term role.

0:31:46.720 --> 0:31:49.080
<v Speaker 5>Colson just happens to fit in his spot right now,

0:31:49.240 --> 0:31:52.680
<v Speaker 5>especially with munatakamer Kami uh sitting on the shelf right now.

0:31:52.800 --> 0:31:56.840
<v Speaker 5>So it's a situation where, uh, yeah, it's going to

0:31:56.920 --> 0:31:58.960
<v Speaker 5>hit a point down the line where we're gonna want

0:31:58.960 --> 0:32:00.320
<v Speaker 5>to see some of these things in per We're going

0:32:00.400 --> 0:32:02.280
<v Speaker 5>to want to continue to see him move in the

0:32:02.320 --> 0:32:04.640
<v Speaker 5>right direction. But I don't think this is so far

0:32:04.680 --> 0:32:06.320
<v Speaker 5>off of where we thought he was going to be

0:32:06.560 --> 0:32:08.640
<v Speaker 5>at this point in his career that I need to

0:32:08.640 --> 0:32:11.160
<v Speaker 5>start being worried about, like him being on a downturn

0:32:11.200 --> 0:32:14.280
<v Speaker 5>of the development, or him becoming a worse player than

0:32:14.360 --> 0:32:17.440
<v Speaker 5>we're expecting, and that he's shown to be. So I

0:32:17.440 --> 0:32:19.560
<v Speaker 5>think it's a lot of people really worried about nothing.

0:32:19.920 --> 0:32:23.080
<v Speaker 6>So I agree with you, guys, that's what it comes

0:32:23.080 --> 0:32:25.920
<v Speaker 6>down to, just like how far that's the ultimate question.

0:32:25.920 --> 0:32:27.800
<v Speaker 6>It can be a rhetorical one for this show, but

0:32:28.080 --> 0:32:30.440
<v Speaker 6>it's the one that listeners have to keep in mind,

0:32:30.520 --> 0:32:37.160
<v Speaker 6>is how is this version of Colson Montgomery relative to

0:32:37.200 --> 0:32:40.360
<v Speaker 6>what your expectations were? Like you just said, Duke, it's

0:32:40.360 --> 0:32:43.200
<v Speaker 6>probably not far off from our expectations internally, and I

0:32:43.240 --> 0:32:45.240
<v Speaker 6>think we agree between the three of us.

0:32:45.760 --> 0:32:46.920
<v Speaker 2>But that's the ultimate question.

0:32:46.960 --> 0:32:49.240
<v Speaker 6>Fans have to ask themselves, how far off of this

0:32:49.320 --> 0:32:52.479
<v Speaker 6>is this version from your expectations? And then let's have

0:32:52.520 --> 0:32:55.560
<v Speaker 6>that conversation about what the expectation was and see how

0:32:55.600 --> 0:32:59.920
<v Speaker 6>realistic it is. Again, if the version is just this

0:33:00.120 --> 0:33:02.160
<v Speaker 6>but a little bit better with Runderson scoring position and

0:33:02.200 --> 0:33:04.760
<v Speaker 6>a little bit better with breaking balls, cool, I think

0:33:04.800 --> 0:33:07.120
<v Speaker 6>we're on the same page. Then I'm not understanding what

0:33:07.160 --> 0:33:09.280
<v Speaker 6>all the back and forth is on Twitter. But I

0:33:09.320 --> 0:33:12.840
<v Speaker 6>still feel like the fact that we've had this conversation

0:33:12.880 --> 0:33:16.360
<v Speaker 6>and saw it on Twitter enough because if people haven't

0:33:16.360 --> 0:33:18.200
<v Speaker 6>figured out, like, hey, what you guys talk about on

0:33:18.240 --> 0:33:21.040
<v Speaker 6>Twitter a lot of times finds its way into these shows.

0:33:21.040 --> 0:33:21.320
<v Speaker 1>Guys.

0:33:22.520 --> 0:33:25.560
<v Speaker 6>But it's like the gap feels bigger at least maybe

0:33:25.560 --> 0:33:27.000
<v Speaker 6>it's a vocal minority.

0:33:27.080 --> 0:33:27.560
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:33:28.200 --> 0:33:32.360
<v Speaker 6>But that question that you pose right there, of how

0:33:32.440 --> 0:33:34.880
<v Speaker 6>is this version compared to what you're expecting of them

0:33:35.000 --> 0:33:36.800
<v Speaker 6>is really the ultimate one everyone has to answer.

0:33:38.320 --> 0:33:41.560
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, and it's you know, it's a situation where I

0:33:41.600 --> 0:33:43.640
<v Speaker 5>still feel like, power wise, I think a lot of

0:33:43.720 --> 0:33:46.440
<v Speaker 5>us should be shocked because it really wasn't a huge

0:33:46.480 --> 0:33:49.080
<v Speaker 5>thing in its profile moving up, so again that feels

0:33:49.080 --> 0:33:51.480
<v Speaker 5>more like a bonus. Him becoming a more complete player

0:33:51.520 --> 0:33:53.880
<v Speaker 5>in the plate is going to be a great thing.

0:33:53.880 --> 0:33:55.840
<v Speaker 5>But you know, you talk about White Sox Twitter las

0:33:56.360 --> 0:33:59.440
<v Speaker 5>and bringing up things that are just ridiculous and don't matter.

0:34:00.680 --> 0:34:03.160
<v Speaker 5>I think this is a good, good, good talking point

0:34:03.160 --> 0:34:06.880
<v Speaker 5>to get into Jacob Gonzales because as and I'm going

0:34:06.960 --> 0:34:08.440
<v Speaker 5>to continue to shout him out because he's done the

0:34:08.480 --> 0:34:12.560
<v Speaker 5>best job of this so far. Pinos calling out people

0:34:12.560 --> 0:34:14.960
<v Speaker 5>about Jacob Gonzales home runs is my favorite thing on

0:34:14.960 --> 0:34:15.640
<v Speaker 5>Twitter right now.

0:34:15.719 --> 0:34:17.000
<v Speaker 1>I genuinely just want.

0:34:16.800 --> 0:34:21.200
<v Speaker 5>To say that because there are so many people throughout

0:34:21.360 --> 0:34:23.600
<v Speaker 5>him getting hot in Charlotte all the way up to

0:34:23.600 --> 0:34:25.440
<v Speaker 5>the day he was called up, even after he was

0:34:25.480 --> 0:34:27.560
<v Speaker 5>called up, talking about how this power was just not

0:34:27.600 --> 0:34:29.719
<v Speaker 5>going to translate to the major league level. He was

0:34:29.719 --> 0:34:31.640
<v Speaker 5>not going to keep up this hot streak because he's

0:34:31.640 --> 0:34:34.000
<v Speaker 5>not playing Charlotte anymore. Because every home run you hit

0:34:34.040 --> 0:34:37.200
<v Speaker 5>in Charlotte doesn't count. As we all know, it's kind

0:34:37.200 --> 0:34:39.440
<v Speaker 5>of similar to you know, hitting a home running Yankee Stadium.

0:34:39.480 --> 0:34:44.640
<v Speaker 5>None of those counts, obviously, correct. So Jacob Gonzalez obviously

0:34:45.200 --> 0:34:48.799
<v Speaker 5>looks pretty damn good for what we all thought about.

0:34:48.520 --> 0:34:50.560
<v Speaker 1>What he was going to be here at this point.

0:34:51.600 --> 0:34:54.080
<v Speaker 5>Lass, I'm not going to just sit here and pick

0:34:54.120 --> 0:34:56.600
<v Speaker 5>on you just because I just happen to freaking absolutely

0:34:56.680 --> 0:35:00.479
<v Speaker 5>nail this one. But you know, your opinion of Jacob

0:35:00.480 --> 0:35:03.440
<v Speaker 5>Gonzalez last year, it was it was the majority, that

0:35:03.680 --> 0:35:06.600
<v Speaker 5>was the majority. He was such a forgotten prospect in

0:35:06.640 --> 0:35:08.920
<v Speaker 5>the grand scheme of things. We all thought he was

0:35:08.960 --> 0:35:10.680
<v Speaker 5>gonna Everyone thought he was going to be just like

0:35:10.760 --> 0:35:12.640
<v Speaker 5>one of those guys that was gonna sit in the minors,

0:35:13.040 --> 0:35:14.839
<v Speaker 5>maybe get a call up at some point, and then

0:35:14.920 --> 0:35:17.200
<v Speaker 5>we were just gonna, you know, come to our senses

0:35:17.239 --> 0:35:19.000
<v Speaker 5>that like, why are we wasting a roster spot on

0:35:19.080 --> 0:35:22.799
<v Speaker 5>this guy? And then he just turns into probably the

0:35:22.800 --> 0:35:25.560
<v Speaker 5>most motivated batter I've seen come up from the minor

0:35:25.640 --> 0:35:28.480
<v Speaker 5>league roster in a good while. Like, I don't know,

0:35:28.480 --> 0:35:30.680
<v Speaker 5>if you just just look at his approach and the plate,

0:35:30.960 --> 0:35:33.279
<v Speaker 5>have you seen a kid come up more focused and

0:35:33.600 --> 0:35:35.640
<v Speaker 5>like at in a bat like the kids ready to

0:35:35.719 --> 0:35:38.880
<v Speaker 5>just mash every step of the way. Nick, what do

0:35:38.920 --> 0:35:40.920
<v Speaker 5>you think about Jacob Gonzales right now and the impact

0:35:40.920 --> 0:35:41.920
<v Speaker 5>he's bringing to this lineup?

0:35:42.719 --> 0:35:45.439
<v Speaker 4>Well, I like you was starting with me after roasting Jordan,

0:35:45.760 --> 0:35:47.080
<v Speaker 4>I was.

0:35:48.680 --> 0:35:51.560
<v Speaker 2>Like, remember all this that you did or this is

0:35:51.640 --> 0:35:53.520
<v Speaker 2>this is this Nick? You talk first?

0:35:53.600 --> 0:35:56.480
<v Speaker 1>I would that's how this works around here.

0:35:57.640 --> 0:35:59.320
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I'm fine with it, and I will admit

0:35:59.480 --> 0:36:03.080
<v Speaker 4>also that I'm I was similar to Jordan's opinion last year.

0:36:03.200 --> 0:36:05.359
<v Speaker 4>I was basically fully like, yeah, Jake and Gozalez will

0:36:05.400 --> 0:36:07.640
<v Speaker 4>never play in the Majors with the White Socks, And

0:36:07.680 --> 0:36:10.399
<v Speaker 4>credit to him, he really changes swing this off season,

0:36:10.520 --> 0:36:12.640
<v Speaker 4>started in for a lot more power and goes to

0:36:12.680 --> 0:36:14.160
<v Speaker 4>show me that these first round picks, even if it

0:36:14.200 --> 0:36:16.440
<v Speaker 4>looks like they're not panning out, they were first rounders

0:36:16.440 --> 0:36:18.440
<v Speaker 4>for a reason. They have talent. They often have the

0:36:18.480 --> 0:36:21.800
<v Speaker 4>ability to make adjustments. So he's even if he doesn't

0:36:21.800 --> 0:36:23.440
<v Speaker 4>have a long term future with the White Socks or

0:36:23.440 --> 0:36:26.280
<v Speaker 4>something goes wrong with his career, it's still a credit

0:36:26.320 --> 0:36:28.160
<v Speaker 4>to him that he was able to reinvent himself in

0:36:28.200 --> 0:36:30.600
<v Speaker 4>this way so far. I mean, he's only been for

0:36:30.719 --> 0:36:32.920
<v Speaker 4>a week or so, but I have been impressed by

0:36:32.960 --> 0:36:35.880
<v Speaker 4>his at bats. I think that Michael Suerro did a

0:36:35.920 --> 0:36:38.200
<v Speaker 4>really good job and his article about Jacob Gonzalez and

0:36:38.239 --> 0:36:40.799
<v Speaker 4>our website a couple of weeks ago, just talking about

0:36:40.800 --> 0:36:42.239
<v Speaker 4>how it's a little bit deeper than just like, oh,

0:36:42.239 --> 0:36:44.719
<v Speaker 4>it's Charlotte, so therefore it's all fake. He really dove

0:36:44.760 --> 0:36:47.480
<v Speaker 4>more into the numbers and the approach, and after reading

0:36:47.520 --> 0:36:48.920
<v Speaker 4>the article, I was thinking, Okay, I want to see

0:36:49.000 --> 0:36:50.719
<v Speaker 4>him in the majors, but I am a little concerned

0:36:50.760 --> 0:36:52.680
<v Speaker 4>that he's in the swing and miss too much in

0:36:52.719 --> 0:36:55.080
<v Speaker 4>the zone to be dangerous. Very similar to what we

0:36:55.120 --> 0:36:57.279
<v Speaker 4>heard about Moracami all off season. And we all see

0:36:57.280 --> 0:37:00.279
<v Speaker 4>all that's been turning out so far. And Gonzal, Yeah,

0:37:00.280 --> 0:37:02.080
<v Speaker 4>he's making missus, but he has good at bats, like

0:37:02.160 --> 0:37:04.759
<v Speaker 4>the quality seems pretty high even when he strikes out.

0:37:04.800 --> 0:37:06.879
<v Speaker 4>I feel he had a good game plan at the plate.

0:37:06.960 --> 0:37:10.080
<v Speaker 4>So I have definitely been pleasantly surprised by him so far,

0:37:10.560 --> 0:37:13.520
<v Speaker 4>to the point where and we'll see, right because Everson

0:37:13.560 --> 0:37:15.920
<v Speaker 4>Pereira is on a rehab assignment right now, he'll probably

0:37:15.920 --> 0:37:18.000
<v Speaker 4>be back somewhat soon, although he did get scratched from

0:37:18.000 --> 0:37:19.279
<v Speaker 4>the Sunday lineup, which.

0:37:19.200 --> 0:37:20.160
<v Speaker 3>Could be good or bad.

0:37:20.719 --> 0:37:24.040
<v Speaker 4>But when he does come back saying it is next

0:37:24.080 --> 0:37:26.839
<v Speaker 4>at some point next week, I probably would rather see

0:37:26.880 --> 0:37:29.399
<v Speaker 4>Gonzales stay up and Nishida go down at this point

0:37:29.440 --> 0:37:32.640
<v Speaker 4>because Gonzales has power that this lineup needs right now

0:37:32.680 --> 0:37:35.319
<v Speaker 4>in the absence of Murakami. So I just want him

0:37:35.320 --> 0:37:37.319
<v Speaker 4>to get, you know, regular playing time and have him

0:37:37.360 --> 0:37:39.759
<v Speaker 4>start pretty much anytime. And it's a handed picture for

0:37:39.800 --> 0:37:41.799
<v Speaker 4>the next few weeks while Marrakami is injured, to give

0:37:41.840 --> 0:37:44.680
<v Speaker 4>him more of a chance to show what he really is.

0:37:44.760 --> 0:37:46.520
<v Speaker 4>But so far, I'm impressed, and it's hard.

0:37:46.360 --> 0:37:46.759
<v Speaker 3>Not to be.

0:37:49.080 --> 0:37:53.239
<v Speaker 6>So understand like why I had the opinion, and I

0:37:53.239 --> 0:37:55.719
<v Speaker 6>think everybody kind of had the opinion, Like understand why,

0:37:55.880 --> 0:37:58.000
<v Speaker 6>Like you look back at his minor league numbers, right,

0:37:58.480 --> 0:38:02.520
<v Speaker 6>had an ops over seven hundred and once at any level,

0:38:02.520 --> 0:38:05.359
<v Speaker 6>and that was Birmingham in twenty twenty four, had a

0:38:05.400 --> 0:38:08.840
<v Speaker 6>slugging over four that started with a four. Never so

0:38:09.000 --> 0:38:12.279
<v Speaker 6>like you needed to do something different or this wasn't

0:38:12.320 --> 0:38:14.520
<v Speaker 6>gonna happen. And you can see and I think that

0:38:14.600 --> 0:38:17.839
<v Speaker 6>was the first thing I said when we started seeing

0:38:17.920 --> 0:38:19.920
<v Speaker 6>videos pop up in Charlotte. I'm like, oh, this actually

0:38:19.920 --> 0:38:22.319
<v Speaker 6>looks different. This is a tangible difference. It's like, I

0:38:22.360 --> 0:38:24.560
<v Speaker 6>think it's absolutely your point, Nick, Like, Hey, at a

0:38:24.560 --> 0:38:27.520
<v Speaker 6>certain point, first rounders first rounder. First rounder doesn't necessarily

0:38:27.600 --> 0:38:30.839
<v Speaker 6>mean you're a finished product, but first rounder absolutely means like,

0:38:31.280 --> 0:38:33.440
<v Speaker 6>you have the talent, you have the skill set, you

0:38:33.480 --> 0:38:36.560
<v Speaker 6>have the hand eye coordination, whatever you want to call it,

0:38:36.600 --> 0:38:37.800
<v Speaker 6>to make meaningful adjustments.

0:38:37.840 --> 0:38:38.279
<v Speaker 1>And he did.

0:38:38.640 --> 0:38:39.239
<v Speaker 2>And I think that.

0:38:39.239 --> 0:38:43.880
<v Speaker 6>Has been impressive too. It's been impressive just to see

0:38:43.920 --> 0:38:45.400
<v Speaker 6>those changes translate.

0:38:46.239 --> 0:38:47.360
<v Speaker 2>He hasn't done anything for me.

0:38:47.880 --> 0:38:51.239
<v Speaker 6>It's a profile where it hasn't done anything to be like,

0:38:51.360 --> 0:38:54.080
<v Speaker 6>oh my god, this absolutely is going to stay. But

0:38:54.360 --> 0:38:56.759
<v Speaker 6>he probably should, right Like, at the end of the day,

0:38:57.360 --> 0:39:00.560
<v Speaker 6>there are enough still empty at bats in the lineup

0:39:00.600 --> 0:39:04.560
<v Speaker 6>in places where it would make sense to continue keep

0:39:04.600 --> 0:39:06.799
<v Speaker 6>him in the lineup. I'm always surprised they never tried

0:39:06.840 --> 0:39:09.080
<v Speaker 6>him in the outfield. I don't the fact that they're

0:39:09.080 --> 0:39:10.880
<v Speaker 6>sticking them in at first base probably says a lot

0:39:10.920 --> 0:39:14.520
<v Speaker 6>about what they think is athleticism is. But I am

0:39:14.560 --> 0:39:16.640
<v Speaker 6>surprised they never tried him in the outfield in Charlotte,

0:39:16.640 --> 0:39:19.520
<v Speaker 6>because that would make this conversation a lot easier unless

0:39:19.520 --> 0:39:21.600
<v Speaker 6>they're planning to move on from Benintendee and just make

0:39:21.600 --> 0:39:24.359
<v Speaker 6>Gonzales the DH or just rotate the dhraw. I don't know,

0:39:26.040 --> 0:39:28.680
<v Speaker 6>but he's done enough to where it absolutely makes sense

0:39:28.760 --> 0:39:31.719
<v Speaker 6>this roster continues to crunch a little bit, gets a

0:39:31.760 --> 0:39:35.400
<v Speaker 6>little bit healthier. I'm interested in seeing more personally. I

0:39:35.480 --> 0:39:41.200
<v Speaker 6>think he's done enough early on, hasn't looked overmatched, can

0:39:41.560 --> 0:39:43.280
<v Speaker 6>pull the ball out of the ballpark, has been pulling

0:39:43.280 --> 0:39:45.480
<v Speaker 6>the ball a lot, which is awesome, which I do

0:39:46.120 --> 0:39:48.600
<v Speaker 6>appreciate things at like a thirty percent poll rate on

0:39:48.680 --> 0:39:52.359
<v Speaker 6>fly balls, perfect perfect like that, That's what you want

0:39:52.440 --> 0:39:57.080
<v Speaker 6>out of a left handed hitter in Chicago. And he'll

0:39:57.080 --> 0:39:58.920
<v Speaker 6>also go backside with a couple of base hits every

0:39:58.920 --> 0:40:01.719
<v Speaker 6>now and then. If he can continue to balance that, yeah,

0:40:01.800 --> 0:40:04.000
<v Speaker 6>let's let's absolutely keep him here and continue to see

0:40:04.000 --> 0:40:05.839
<v Speaker 6>what he can do well.

0:40:05.840 --> 0:40:08.480
<v Speaker 5>And he's even pulling really well just on foul balls,

0:40:08.680 --> 0:40:11.759
<v Speaker 5>like just being able to you know, anytime he's pulling

0:40:11.840 --> 0:40:13.319
<v Speaker 5>the ball and he's getting a good piece of it,

0:40:13.480 --> 0:40:16.400
<v Speaker 5>even if it's not staying within the line, he's getting

0:40:16.400 --> 0:40:23.040
<v Speaker 5>a really good run on it in the foul territory. Honestly,

0:40:23.520 --> 0:40:25.960
<v Speaker 5>I'm still kind of trying to make sense of him

0:40:26.000 --> 0:40:29.319
<v Speaker 5>playing first base. I feel like that's more of a

0:40:29.719 --> 0:40:32.160
<v Speaker 5>Vargas has earned the right to be the full time

0:40:32.200 --> 0:40:36.359
<v Speaker 5>third baseman discussion more than it is that. I don't

0:40:36.360 --> 0:40:38.279
<v Speaker 5>think he's ever been a guy you'd ever want to

0:40:38.280 --> 0:40:42.080
<v Speaker 5>see in center field per se. I'm not entirely sure

0:40:42.080 --> 0:40:45.080
<v Speaker 5>how how the White Sox continue to move around with that,

0:40:45.120 --> 0:40:47.240
<v Speaker 5>because first base does not feel like a permanent position.

0:40:47.600 --> 0:40:50.600
<v Speaker 5>He's got a little bit more athleticism than what a

0:40:50.640 --> 0:40:53.680
<v Speaker 5>typical first baseman would be. I mean, whenever we watch

0:40:53.719 --> 0:40:55.200
<v Speaker 5>the game, does he not stick out like a sore

0:40:55.239 --> 0:40:57.960
<v Speaker 5>thumb out there like at first base? Just by looking

0:40:58.000 --> 0:41:02.800
<v Speaker 5>at him, not like defensively, it looks off. So hopefully

0:41:02.880 --> 0:41:05.880
<v Speaker 5>that's something that we start being able to kind of

0:41:05.920 --> 0:41:09.320
<v Speaker 5>move him to different positions once Moonataca makes that return,

0:41:09.520 --> 0:41:12.000
<v Speaker 5>because I think so far his bat's done enough to

0:41:12.040 --> 0:41:14.160
<v Speaker 5>say that he should be able to stick around once

0:41:14.239 --> 0:41:17.160
<v Speaker 5>Moonataka Murcimi comes back. Obviously you're gonna have more of

0:41:17.200 --> 0:41:21.560
<v Speaker 5>those difficult roster discussions. Andrew ben Attende is always the

0:41:21.640 --> 0:41:24.800
<v Speaker 5>name that comes up. As I made a very strong

0:41:24.840 --> 0:41:27.279
<v Speaker 5>point of on Twitter, it's almost like he is just

0:41:27.440 --> 0:41:30.399
<v Speaker 5>like an inhabitor of madness and loves it every time

0:41:30.440 --> 0:41:32.560
<v Speaker 5>somebody tells him that he's going about to be cuttered

0:41:32.560 --> 0:41:34.600
<v Speaker 5>de fad because then magically he just decides to go

0:41:34.680 --> 0:41:37.960
<v Speaker 5>absolutely nuclear. Makes absolutely no sense, But it's kind of

0:41:38.000 --> 0:41:41.200
<v Speaker 5>like the Michael Jordan I took that personally deal. So

0:41:41.960 --> 0:41:43.719
<v Speaker 5>I mean, if that's what, if that's what we need

0:41:43.760 --> 0:41:46.600
<v Speaker 5>to do to get Andrew Bantenna to continue hit that's fine.

0:41:46.640 --> 0:41:49.920
<v Speaker 5>But overall, like I'm not going to do a victory

0:41:49.960 --> 0:41:52.280
<v Speaker 5>lap on you last, Like I said at the original

0:41:52.280 --> 0:41:57.080
<v Speaker 5>top of the point, was your opinion of Jacob Gonzalez

0:41:57.400 --> 0:42:00.840
<v Speaker 5>was not off from the grind and the majority of

0:42:00.880 --> 0:42:02.839
<v Speaker 5>how people felt about him because he was just kind

0:42:02.840 --> 0:42:05.239
<v Speaker 5>of a name that was kind of falling into the backside.

0:42:05.600 --> 0:42:08.560
<v Speaker 5>But you know, when are we going to give some

0:42:08.600 --> 0:42:13.680
<v Speaker 5>credit to this fucking Campsites guy just for helping develop

0:42:13.760 --> 0:42:17.640
<v Speaker 5>some freaking hitters down in Charlotte, Because are we are

0:42:17.640 --> 0:42:18.920
<v Speaker 5>we going to have we have to build him a

0:42:19.000 --> 0:42:21.399
<v Speaker 5>lab or like what's going on here? Because we're starting

0:42:21.440 --> 0:42:23.200
<v Speaker 5>to get some guys that are really mashing coming out

0:42:23.239 --> 0:42:25.520
<v Speaker 5>of the miners and it's kind of kind of mind

0:42:25.560 --> 0:42:27.400
<v Speaker 5>boggling because this was never the norm before.

0:42:28.120 --> 0:42:30.600
<v Speaker 6>It's actually I remember a conversation we had last year

0:42:30.719 --> 0:42:33.960
<v Speaker 6>or like Ryan Fuller, like, oh right, maybe maybe you

0:42:34.040 --> 0:42:37.080
<v Speaker 6>are doing something down there as the director of hitting.

0:42:37.800 --> 0:42:41.520
<v Speaker 6>Derek Schouman obviously a very positive start for him at

0:42:41.560 --> 0:42:45.000
<v Speaker 6>the big league level this year. We had this conversation

0:42:45.120 --> 0:42:47.600
<v Speaker 6>last year, like, are we starting to see that that

0:42:47.680 --> 0:42:51.400
<v Speaker 6>feeling of what this organization does well flip away from

0:42:51.719 --> 0:42:54.640
<v Speaker 6>being very pitching dominant and pitching heavy to being very

0:42:54.680 --> 0:42:57.840
<v Speaker 6>offense heavy. And I think we're getting even closer to that,

0:42:57.880 --> 0:42:59.840
<v Speaker 6>if not we fully flipped.

0:43:01.239 --> 0:43:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Schultz.

0:43:01.600 --> 0:43:03.560
<v Speaker 6>We talked about with Sean Anderson last week. We talked

0:43:03.560 --> 0:43:06.920
<v Speaker 6>about on our own good but not great yet. Tan

0:43:07.040 --> 0:43:10.120
<v Speaker 6>mcdoul has been hurt. Can't really tell. Hagen Smith might

0:43:10.160 --> 0:43:12.080
<v Speaker 6>have lowered his armslaughted, or it seems like lowering his

0:43:12.200 --> 0:43:16.239
<v Speaker 6>armslot again might have helped. But you haven't had any

0:43:16.239 --> 0:43:22.240
<v Speaker 6>bullpen arms really pop up out of nowhere. Davis Martin

0:43:22.360 --> 0:43:24.840
<v Speaker 6>is probably a win, but Davis Martin's been around forever.

0:43:28.600 --> 0:43:30.560
<v Speaker 6>I was gonna say Davis Martin and Sean Burke are

0:43:30.600 --> 0:43:35.440
<v Speaker 6>guys that Rick Han drafted and got the process started

0:43:35.440 --> 0:43:37.400
<v Speaker 6>to the big leagues. That was before Bannister and all

0:43:37.480 --> 0:43:40.919
<v Speaker 6>of them too. So I don't know, it's at least

0:43:40.960 --> 0:43:43.239
<v Speaker 6>at this point where like you can make a convincing

0:43:43.320 --> 0:43:46.319
<v Speaker 6>argument that this is absolutely flipped in at least the

0:43:46.360 --> 0:43:49.120
<v Speaker 6>recent memory for this, and I think it echoes some

0:43:49.200 --> 0:43:52.280
<v Speaker 6>of the conversations we started this kind of this podcast

0:43:52.280 --> 0:43:55.200
<v Speaker 6>with with man, You're you're going toe to toe with

0:43:55.280 --> 0:43:57.560
<v Speaker 6>a team like the Phillies. Yes, they've had their struggles,

0:43:57.560 --> 0:44:01.120
<v Speaker 6>but they're still above five hundred and your pitching just

0:44:01.400 --> 0:44:03.480
<v Speaker 6>can't keep you in ball games the way that your

0:44:03.480 --> 0:44:08.480
<v Speaker 6>offense can. That that's a credit to everyone in the

0:44:08.560 --> 0:44:11.200
<v Speaker 6>hitting department that might be taking over what we thought

0:44:11.239 --> 0:44:13.680
<v Speaker 6>was a pitching dominant organization.

0:44:16.200 --> 0:44:22.040
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, certainly, I think it's It's definitely it's something we

0:44:22.040 --> 0:44:24.160
<v Speaker 5>should pick up on a little bit later in the season,

0:44:24.239 --> 0:44:26.080
<v Speaker 5>like what we should light it simmer, but we should

0:44:26.120 --> 0:44:28.200
<v Speaker 5>continue to keep an eye on what side of the

0:44:28.640 --> 0:44:31.040
<v Speaker 5>what like what side of the coin are we developing better?

0:44:31.440 --> 0:44:34.319
<v Speaker 5>Obviously right now it looks like it's hitting, But you

0:44:34.360 --> 0:44:36.640
<v Speaker 5>know what is what is Noah Schultz turn this season

0:44:36.640 --> 0:44:38.440
<v Speaker 5>into what does Hagen Smith look like?

0:44:38.480 --> 0:44:38.680
<v Speaker 3>Here?

0:44:38.760 --> 0:44:41.359
<v Speaker 1>Long term? If we can get mcdougle onto the Major

0:44:41.400 --> 0:44:42.680
<v Speaker 1>League roster, see what he can do.

0:44:43.360 --> 0:44:47.080
<v Speaker 5>That's something to definitely keep an eye on moving forward.

0:44:47.719 --> 0:44:49.920
<v Speaker 5>So Chris Gats and we discussed this a little bit,

0:44:49.960 --> 0:44:52.360
<v Speaker 5>just a little bit about deadline early on, and we

0:44:52.400 --> 0:44:55.600
<v Speaker 5>can kind of cover it here again. Chris Gatz continues

0:44:55.640 --> 0:44:58.520
<v Speaker 5>double down on this team, saying that if this team

0:44:58.600 --> 0:45:02.200
<v Speaker 5>keeps this current trajectory, uh, ignoring the fact we just

0:45:02.239 --> 0:45:04.640
<v Speaker 5>lost you series in a row, he would look to

0:45:04.680 --> 0:45:09.160
<v Speaker 5>make some sort of additions at the deadline. Give me something,

0:45:09.280 --> 0:45:12.320
<v Speaker 5>what do you like? What what do you think outside

0:45:12.360 --> 0:45:15.600
<v Speaker 5>of you know, aiming for the moon and trading for

0:45:15.800 --> 0:45:19.359
<v Speaker 5>freaking top level pitching on the on the market. What

0:45:19.360 --> 0:45:21.200
<v Speaker 5>what does a trade deadline look like for the White

0:45:21.239 --> 0:45:23.759
<v Speaker 5>Sox if we're if we're continuing at this pace that

0:45:23.800 --> 0:45:25.640
<v Speaker 5>we're at right now, I.

0:45:25.680 --> 0:45:29.040
<v Speaker 6>Think it's more interesting to consider who would go. I

0:45:29.080 --> 0:45:31.200
<v Speaker 6>think that's where it may make the most sense tic

0:45:31.280 --> 0:45:34.120
<v Speaker 6>this conversation. I think we've talked about like, yes, pitching, pitching, pitching,

0:45:34.200 --> 0:45:37.839
<v Speaker 6>dot but who would you realistically be willing to move

0:45:37.880 --> 0:45:41.640
<v Speaker 6>from the scene because you're not getting pitching for free.

0:45:41.840 --> 0:45:44.040
<v Speaker 6>I've seen Billy Carlson's name thrown a lot around a

0:45:44.040 --> 0:45:48.520
<v Speaker 6>lot by Socks fans. I don't know if Jacob Gonzalez

0:45:48.600 --> 0:45:51.480
<v Speaker 6>becomes a name you throw around simply because where does

0:45:51.520 --> 0:45:54.399
<v Speaker 6>he fit. It's it's not that he isn't good, but hey,

0:45:54.960 --> 0:45:58.920
<v Speaker 6>once Marcami gets healthy, are you ready to pull the

0:45:58.960 --> 0:46:00.880
<v Speaker 6>plug on ben in Tender? You're not, because if you're not,

0:46:01.640 --> 0:46:04.480
<v Speaker 6>I don't know how you're putting him out.

0:46:04.320 --> 0:46:04.920
<v Speaker 2>There every day.

0:46:04.960 --> 0:46:09.080
<v Speaker 6>Like it's let's just say he's hitting at least two

0:46:09.160 --> 0:46:11.759
<v Speaker 6>fifty with a seven fifty ops or something like that.

0:46:11.760 --> 0:46:16.640
<v Speaker 6>That's probably too good to send back to Charlotte. But

0:46:17.320 --> 0:46:20.440
<v Speaker 6>the bats don't exist here, so where are you planning

0:46:20.480 --> 0:46:24.719
<v Speaker 6>to put him? Those are two names that pop up

0:46:24.719 --> 0:46:27.719
<v Speaker 6>to me just immediately. I don't know how much they're

0:46:28.280 --> 0:46:30.040
<v Speaker 6>going to be willing to move, or how much either

0:46:30.080 --> 0:46:33.399
<v Speaker 6>of them would command in return, but like I said,

0:46:33.520 --> 0:46:35.600
<v Speaker 6>it's definitely more interesting to start thinking about who you

0:46:35.680 --> 0:46:39.279
<v Speaker 6>might be willing to move rather than you know, who

0:46:39.320 --> 0:46:41.239
<v Speaker 6>are they going to get, because that's still a little

0:46:41.280 --> 0:46:41.759
<v Speaker 6>far off.

0:46:43.080 --> 0:46:46.640
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I agree that the infield glut is what makes

0:46:46.680 --> 0:46:49.560
<v Speaker 4>sense to trade from Billy Carlson. I mean, I know

0:46:49.840 --> 0:46:52.080
<v Speaker 4>he's probably what like nineteen or something, so if you're

0:46:52.080 --> 0:46:53.400
<v Speaker 4>going to trade him, you might not. You have to

0:46:53.400 --> 0:46:57.200
<v Speaker 4>get somebody with control who you think is a higher

0:46:57.280 --> 0:47:00.200
<v Speaker 4>on talent, right, I wouldn't trade him for like out

0:47:00.200 --> 0:47:02.719
<v Speaker 4>of one or two years of control. That being said,

0:47:02.920 --> 0:47:05.600
<v Speaker 4>I wouldn't trade bonham Er either, because this team is

0:47:05.640 --> 0:47:08.759
<v Speaker 4>still like five hundred ish, So I don't think you

0:47:08.800 --> 0:47:11.719
<v Speaker 4>should be trading the prospectors that good. So that puts

0:47:11.719 --> 0:47:13.960
<v Speaker 4>you in the sweet spot of yeah, that the Jacobugnzalez

0:47:14.040 --> 0:47:17.359
<v Speaker 4>types or the William Bargoio juniors. I mean, he's been

0:47:17.360 --> 0:47:20.080
<v Speaker 4>injured for like a month or so, but guys who

0:47:20.080 --> 0:47:22.360
<v Speaker 4>were in Triple A or the majors who have, you know,

0:47:22.440 --> 0:47:25.160
<v Speaker 4>good stats and might project well. But to grmerally have

0:47:25.200 --> 0:47:27.000
<v Speaker 4>a space on this team. I mean we all agree.

0:47:27.040 --> 0:47:28.759
<v Speaker 4>I mean Montgomery, like I said, he the top five

0:47:28.760 --> 0:47:30.799
<v Speaker 4>short stops so far this year. You're not getting rid

0:47:30.800 --> 0:47:34.960
<v Speaker 4>of him anytime soon. Vargas obviously has been a revelation Murakami,

0:47:35.040 --> 0:47:37.479
<v Speaker 4>I hope to have long term. And then at second

0:47:37.520 --> 0:47:40.200
<v Speaker 4>base slash left field, both my draft and Antonacci have

0:47:40.239 --> 0:47:43.520
<v Speaker 4>been very solid players. And I don't think we'll only

0:47:43.520 --> 0:47:45.160
<v Speaker 4>put it this. I think I think the fan base,

0:47:45.440 --> 0:47:47.319
<v Speaker 4>which for whatever reason, has been trying to get rid

0:47:47.360 --> 0:47:49.719
<v Speaker 4>of Chase, my draft will take his job away like

0:47:49.760 --> 0:47:52.480
<v Speaker 4>all season finally in the last few weeks of reals. Hey,

0:47:52.480 --> 0:47:54.160
<v Speaker 4>he's actually a good player too, He's.

0:47:54.000 --> 0:47:55.600
<v Speaker 3>Just not like a flashy guy or whatever.

0:47:55.680 --> 0:47:58.920
<v Speaker 4>So yeah, most of yeah, that goes a year or

0:47:58.920 --> 0:48:01.000
<v Speaker 4>two from now, But for right now now, I don't see,

0:48:01.080 --> 0:48:03.680
<v Speaker 4>to Jordan's point, where Gonzalez is playing unless there's an

0:48:03.680 --> 0:48:06.520
<v Speaker 4>injury or if you're taking out bats away from benin Tendi,

0:48:06.600 --> 0:48:08.000
<v Speaker 4>which I don't think the team is going to do

0:48:08.040 --> 0:48:08.719
<v Speaker 4>anytime soon.

0:48:08.880 --> 0:48:10.920
<v Speaker 3>So he's the most logical candidate.

0:48:10.960 --> 0:48:13.480
<v Speaker 4>And if he can continue hitting well obviously smallest sample

0:48:13.640 --> 0:48:15.480
<v Speaker 4>to be hits well, you might actually have some real

0:48:15.560 --> 0:48:17.720
<v Speaker 4>value to where you can get like a starting pitcher

0:48:17.719 --> 0:48:20.439
<v Speaker 4>for him rather than just a rental or something like that.

0:48:21.440 --> 0:48:23.680
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. I do wonder if they trade my draft.

0:48:23.680 --> 0:48:27.360
<v Speaker 6>I'm gonna be honest, I I could see it in

0:48:27.400 --> 0:48:30.479
<v Speaker 6>a world. Let's just say, Jake Gonzalez looks really good.

0:48:30.520 --> 0:48:33.080
<v Speaker 6>He's a middle endfielder. By trade, you could probably teach

0:48:33.160 --> 0:48:37.839
<v Speaker 6>him second base. He might have a power potential if

0:48:37.840 --> 0:48:41.480
<v Speaker 6>he can walk enough that my draft doesn't like we've

0:48:41.520 --> 0:48:46.440
<v Speaker 6>talked about before with Antonachi and my draft and Nashida Times.

0:48:46.440 --> 0:48:47.040
<v Speaker 2>How many of these.

0:48:46.920 --> 0:48:48.839
<v Speaker 6>Guys can you have in a lineup that all kind

0:48:48.840 --> 0:48:50.680
<v Speaker 6>of do the same thing. You can really only have one,

0:48:50.800 --> 0:48:52.719
<v Speaker 6>maybe two of them long term.

0:48:52.880 --> 0:48:54.319
<v Speaker 2>So I don't know.

0:48:54.360 --> 0:48:57.600
<v Speaker 6>I would maybe add him to the say it sounds weird,

0:48:57.640 --> 0:48:59.640
<v Speaker 6>it sounds funky, and it's not because I think he

0:48:59.760 --> 0:49:02.960
<v Speaker 6>saw or like to to your point about the fan

0:49:03.000 --> 0:49:04.760
<v Speaker 6>base neck like, he's a very good baseball player.

0:49:05.040 --> 0:49:07.799
<v Speaker 2>It just might not be what they need. It might

0:49:07.880 --> 0:49:08.560
<v Speaker 2>be more.

0:49:08.440 --> 0:49:12.080
<v Speaker 6>So like I don't think Antonaci's a left fielder moving forward,

0:49:12.120 --> 0:49:15.480
<v Speaker 6>Like the defensive metrics haven't been kind to him, And

0:49:15.680 --> 0:49:19.000
<v Speaker 6>I get granted that's a guy learning a position, but

0:49:20.400 --> 0:49:22.719
<v Speaker 6>I just don't know. Maybe maybe this season, yes, but

0:49:23.160 --> 0:49:26.000
<v Speaker 6>kind of see what it looks like long term.

0:49:27.239 --> 0:49:29.800
<v Speaker 2>Does that leave a spot for my draft?

0:49:29.880 --> 0:49:31.920
<v Speaker 6>I think we've all kind of said it's either Antonaci

0:49:32.000 --> 0:49:34.120
<v Speaker 6>or my draft, like in terms of who plays that

0:49:34.200 --> 0:49:36.840
<v Speaker 6>role in the lineup, maybe both do long term, but

0:49:37.520 --> 0:49:40.359
<v Speaker 6>I don't know i'd put him on there. If Gonzales

0:49:40.400 --> 0:49:42.680
<v Speaker 6>looks so good, you're like, eh, I don't know if

0:49:42.719 --> 0:49:45.560
<v Speaker 6>I want to trade him, But also I might want

0:49:45.600 --> 0:49:48.279
<v Speaker 6>to put him in future plans where maybe he had

0:49:48.280 --> 0:49:49.160
<v Speaker 6>not been there before.

0:49:49.800 --> 0:49:52.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, really quick too, because it's sorry, sorry to not

0:49:52.680 --> 0:49:54.759
<v Speaker 4>let he's jump in yet. But just one thing that

0:49:54.880 --> 0:49:56.680
<v Speaker 4>Len benefits my draft is that he's a right hand

0:49:56.719 --> 0:49:59.239
<v Speaker 4>to hit her would is a bit ironic because the

0:49:59.280 --> 0:50:01.920
<v Speaker 4>old White Sox had the opposite problem. But if you

0:50:02.000 --> 0:50:04.440
<v Speaker 4>take him out of the lineup, it's so left handed

0:50:04.480 --> 0:50:07.799
<v Speaker 4>heavy that the team throws the lessie against him. Is okay, great,

0:50:07.840 --> 0:50:10.040
<v Speaker 4>we lost the game already, let's move on. So I'm

0:50:10.080 --> 0:50:11.560
<v Speaker 4>not saying you can't trade him.

0:50:11.680 --> 0:50:12.320
<v Speaker 3>But it helps.

0:50:13.040 --> 0:50:15.600
<v Speaker 2>No, it's a valid point. It is something that.

0:50:17.560 --> 0:50:20.440
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I don't know if I have a good that's

0:50:20.520 --> 0:50:22.640
<v Speaker 6>that's a valid point that that is absolutely something you

0:50:22.680 --> 0:50:23.480
<v Speaker 6>have to consider with this.

0:50:24.120 --> 0:50:28.840
<v Speaker 5>So I'm probably gonna have the most unlikable, boring, lame

0:50:28.960 --> 0:50:30.359
<v Speaker 5>answer possible here.

0:50:30.920 --> 0:50:31.400
<v Speaker 3>Nobody.

0:50:32.239 --> 0:50:36.080
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I'm actually no, I'm actually there. I am not

0:50:36.400 --> 0:50:39.719
<v Speaker 5>out on any of these prospects yet. I have not

0:50:39.920 --> 0:50:43.920
<v Speaker 5>seen one of these prospects throughout the minor leagues offend

0:50:43.960 --> 0:50:45.560
<v Speaker 5>me to the point where I'm ready to move on

0:50:45.640 --> 0:50:48.960
<v Speaker 5>from him. And I'm like, I always get told by

0:50:49.000 --> 0:50:51.440
<v Speaker 5>one of my coworkers when I talk sports that he

0:50:51.480 --> 0:50:54.399
<v Speaker 5>has to tell me he doesn't he doesn't just get

0:50:54.400 --> 0:50:55.839
<v Speaker 5>a rise out of me. But he has to tell

0:50:55.880 --> 0:50:58.080
<v Speaker 5>me that, like, you're not a general manager. You're fucking

0:50:58.080 --> 0:51:00.080
<v Speaker 5>a guy that sits at home and watches the game drink.

0:51:00.520 --> 0:51:03.920
<v Speaker 5>And it's like, yeah, okay, I get it. But like,

0:51:04.120 --> 0:51:06.960
<v Speaker 5>my my entire stance, and this goes across all sports,

0:51:07.080 --> 0:51:10.960
<v Speaker 5>is like I want to accumulate so many assets and

0:51:11.120 --> 0:51:13.440
<v Speaker 5>see what I can make out of what I already have,

0:51:14.320 --> 0:51:17.680
<v Speaker 5>and I want to be so sure that when I

0:51:17.840 --> 0:51:19.719
<v Speaker 5>make that a great when I make that move to

0:51:19.920 --> 0:51:23.720
<v Speaker 5>like bring in like established players and make a run,

0:51:23.920 --> 0:51:25.960
<v Speaker 5>that I'm one hundred percent I'm one hundred percent sure

0:51:25.960 --> 0:51:27.839
<v Speaker 5>about what I have. I'm one hundred percent sure about

0:51:27.840 --> 0:51:28.719
<v Speaker 5>what I'm sending out.

0:51:29.760 --> 0:51:29.960
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:51:30.040 --> 0:51:33.279
<v Speaker 5>Maybe I'm maybe I'm sending out a player that I'm

0:51:33.280 --> 0:51:35.839
<v Speaker 5>not as high on that the rest of baseball.

0:51:35.560 --> 0:51:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Is really high on, you know.

0:51:38.120 --> 0:51:40.000
<v Speaker 5>And I'm just trying to work with the deal as

0:51:40.080 --> 0:51:44.480
<v Speaker 5>much as humanly possible. And I think at the absolute

0:51:44.560 --> 0:51:46.320
<v Speaker 5>earliest we look at.

0:51:46.160 --> 0:51:47.200
<v Speaker 1>This in the offseason.

0:51:47.440 --> 0:51:49.640
<v Speaker 5>I think you go into winter meetings and you take

0:51:49.680 --> 0:51:51.880
<v Speaker 5>a little bit more of a look at who's available

0:51:51.920 --> 0:51:54.680
<v Speaker 5>on the trade market. Uh, you see what free agent

0:51:54.719 --> 0:51:56.960
<v Speaker 5>bats look like, you look at what free agent starting

0:51:57.000 --> 0:51:59.440
<v Speaker 5>pitching looks like. You kind of take a look at

0:51:59.480 --> 0:52:01.799
<v Speaker 5>the entire and see where you're at, and then you

0:52:01.920 --> 0:52:05.279
<v Speaker 5>start to, uh, you know, self evaluate what you have

0:52:05.400 --> 0:52:07.960
<v Speaker 5>in this farm, and then you kind of dictate who

0:52:08.000 --> 0:52:09.960
<v Speaker 5>you feel comfortable with trading and who you want to

0:52:10.000 --> 0:52:12.400
<v Speaker 5>start kind of uh, you know, kind of hanging out

0:52:12.440 --> 0:52:13.440
<v Speaker 5>in trades and whatnot.

0:52:13.880 --> 0:52:17.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm just not there this season. This season's been.

0:52:17.000 --> 0:52:19.520
<v Speaker 5>A lot of fun early on. I'm really excited with

0:52:19.560 --> 0:52:22.799
<v Speaker 5>where the team's going. I think there's a lot of

0:52:22.800 --> 0:52:25.200
<v Speaker 5>potential here, and you know, I don't think it's completely

0:52:25.200 --> 0:52:27.440
<v Speaker 5>outside their own possibility. We can make playoffs this year

0:52:27.440 --> 0:52:29.440
<v Speaker 5>in a wild card or maybe we even see you

0:52:29.440 --> 0:52:31.640
<v Speaker 5>can get the Central But I am not in a

0:52:31.680 --> 0:52:33.319
<v Speaker 5>situation where I'm willing to.

0:52:35.080 --> 0:52:37.880
<v Speaker 1>Open that window too early because I still feel like

0:52:37.920 --> 0:52:38.560
<v Speaker 1>it's too early.

0:52:38.600 --> 0:52:40.520
<v Speaker 5>We I still feel like I need to know who

0:52:40.520 --> 0:52:42.520
<v Speaker 5>some of these players are before I'm willing to just

0:52:42.600 --> 0:52:44.440
<v Speaker 5>jump into that. I know this is this is the

0:52:44.480 --> 0:52:46.520
<v Speaker 5>lame answer. This is the answer nobody wants to hear.

0:52:46.920 --> 0:52:51.560
<v Speaker 5>It's it's it's everybody hates it because everybody wants, you know,

0:52:51.640 --> 0:52:53.640
<v Speaker 5>everyone wants to look at the idea of well, if

0:52:53.640 --> 0:52:55.160
<v Speaker 5>you have the opportunity to win, you got to go

0:52:55.200 --> 0:52:56.880
<v Speaker 5>try to do it. It's like, yeah, and that's how

0:52:56.920 --> 0:52:59.359
<v Speaker 5>you turn into the fucking Baltimore Orioles. And I don't

0:52:59.360 --> 0:53:01.520
<v Speaker 5>want to do that. I want to hit a situation

0:53:01.600 --> 0:53:04.920
<v Speaker 5>where what we finally know what we have at our

0:53:04.960 --> 0:53:07.920
<v Speaker 5>core one hundred percent, what we're comfortable with, who we

0:53:07.960 --> 0:53:11.440
<v Speaker 5>can pay to keep, and then, like I'm talking, we

0:53:11.480 --> 0:53:14.040
<v Speaker 5>can get as aggressive as humanly possible, trade a shit

0:53:14.120 --> 0:53:15.799
<v Speaker 5>ton of our farm to get the players we need

0:53:15.840 --> 0:53:19.160
<v Speaker 5>to make a run, and then actually seriously make a run.

0:53:19.440 --> 0:53:23.720
<v Speaker 5>And we're not in a situation like before twenty twenty

0:53:23.719 --> 0:53:26.200
<v Speaker 5>with the White Sox, where we decide to go spend

0:53:26.200 --> 0:53:29.960
<v Speaker 5>in free agency and then we've given up so much

0:53:29.960 --> 0:53:31.960
<v Speaker 5>of what we already have that once we realize that

0:53:32.560 --> 0:53:35.720
<v Speaker 5>our core is not our core, we're completely fucked.

0:53:36.040 --> 0:53:38.880
<v Speaker 2>So, I mean, they didn't have anything.

0:53:39.320 --> 0:53:43.080
<v Speaker 6>Here's the concern with this. Here's the concern with this.

0:53:43.520 --> 0:53:45.640
<v Speaker 6>And it's not like on the surface, it's not all

0:53:45.719 --> 0:53:49.040
<v Speaker 6>this is wrong. It's more so like do you ever

0:53:49.440 --> 0:53:52.080
<v Speaker 6>know for one hundred percent sure what you have like

0:53:52.160 --> 0:53:54.920
<v Speaker 6>that that that's part of the problem for me, Like

0:53:56.719 --> 0:53:58.879
<v Speaker 6>you have to do your best, guess like you, that's

0:53:58.960 --> 0:54:02.640
<v Speaker 6>why projections, that's why analytics exist. Like that, you're doing

0:54:02.680 --> 0:54:06.239
<v Speaker 6>your best shot at it. I don't think where that

0:54:06.400 --> 0:54:10.120
<v Speaker 6>falls short for this team historically is when you wait

0:54:10.239 --> 0:54:12.120
<v Speaker 6>too long, and you wait too long and you don't

0:54:12.120 --> 0:54:13.719
<v Speaker 6>make the move, and that you don't make the move,

0:54:13.960 --> 0:54:18.640
<v Speaker 6>and now you're dumping Louise Robert for Louisan Helocunya. Who fine,

0:54:18.760 --> 0:54:22.279
<v Speaker 6>I get it, but that's Louis on Helocunya. Is not

0:54:22.320 --> 0:54:24.640
<v Speaker 6>the trade packages White Sox fans were putting together for

0:54:24.719 --> 0:54:28.000
<v Speaker 6>Louise Robert three years ago, right, So you have to

0:54:28.000 --> 0:54:30.520
<v Speaker 6>wait against that. I don't think you need to make

0:54:30.560 --> 0:54:33.200
<v Speaker 6>any splash moves necessarily. I think we're probably all in

0:54:33.239 --> 0:54:36.200
<v Speaker 6>agreement there. But I also think about from the flip side,

0:54:36.239 --> 0:54:39.000
<v Speaker 6>what message it sends to this group to be like, no, no, no,

0:54:39.160 --> 0:54:41.600
<v Speaker 6>you guys just go out there. We're playing with house money.

0:54:41.600 --> 0:54:43.360
<v Speaker 6>We're not doing nothing. You guys go figure out. Like

0:54:43.520 --> 0:54:46.160
<v Speaker 6>at a certain point, you have to show the group,

0:54:46.200 --> 0:54:49.000
<v Speaker 6>even if it's a small thing, that you believe in

0:54:49.080 --> 0:54:51.640
<v Speaker 6>them and are willing to go a little bit of

0:54:51.640 --> 0:54:54.440
<v Speaker 6>an extra mile to help this crew out. I think

0:54:54.480 --> 0:54:58.720
<v Speaker 6>it's a bad look to send. If you just don't

0:54:58.760 --> 0:55:00.920
<v Speaker 6>do anything and you say, well, we're schedule and we

0:55:01.160 --> 0:55:03.640
<v Speaker 6>don't really care what happens here. I mean, you wouldn't

0:55:03.680 --> 0:55:06.080
<v Speaker 6>say it in those words, but that's how the players

0:55:06.120 --> 0:55:06.640
<v Speaker 6>would view it.

0:55:06.680 --> 0:55:07.120
<v Speaker 2>You see it.

0:55:07.120 --> 0:55:11.719
<v Speaker 6>Every year when really good teams don't invest at the

0:55:11.719 --> 0:55:15.360
<v Speaker 6>trade deadline the way they should. You see a comment

0:55:15.480 --> 0:55:17.080
<v Speaker 6>or two come out where they're like, yeah, I guess

0:55:17.120 --> 0:55:18.880
<v Speaker 6>this and this and this about the front office, but

0:55:19.200 --> 0:55:20.919
<v Speaker 6>we'll do what we have, what we've got, like we're

0:55:20.920 --> 0:55:24.279
<v Speaker 6>confident in ourselves as players. Since the players saying it,

0:55:24.360 --> 0:55:27.359
<v Speaker 6>not the front office saying it, that's what you have

0:55:27.400 --> 0:55:29.920
<v Speaker 6>to balance against it. Because he's done such a good job,

0:55:30.040 --> 0:55:33.759
<v Speaker 6>he being venable, creating such a good culture, you have

0:55:33.800 --> 0:55:36.719
<v Speaker 6>to make sure you don't screw it by not making

0:55:36.800 --> 0:55:40.920
<v Speaker 6>a strategic addition here or there. Again, you don't want

0:55:40.920 --> 0:55:44.480
<v Speaker 6>to give up a perennial All Star for a two

0:55:44.560 --> 0:55:49.120
<v Speaker 6>year rental pitcher. But I do think that based on

0:55:49.160 --> 0:55:51.720
<v Speaker 6>what this team's done previously, at least on the trade market,

0:55:51.760 --> 0:55:53.799
<v Speaker 6>like it's been a lot of either win wins or

0:55:53.840 --> 0:55:56.760
<v Speaker 6>lose lose, Like there hasn't been a lot of They've

0:55:56.800 --> 0:55:59.560
<v Speaker 6>got absolutely fleeced in a deal because they were idiots

0:55:59.560 --> 0:56:02.080
<v Speaker 6>who didn't know what they had. I mean thinking about

0:56:02.080 --> 0:56:04.319
<v Speaker 6>like the Christian main A deal where everyone freaked out

0:56:04.320 --> 0:56:06.719
<v Speaker 6>about that. I think he's getting sold shoulder surgery and

0:56:06.719 --> 0:56:10.960
<v Speaker 6>hasn't really pitched all that much. Yeah, they got Dominic Fletcher,

0:56:11.280 --> 0:56:13.120
<v Speaker 6>But at the same time, that's one of.

0:56:13.080 --> 0:56:13.719
<v Speaker 2>Those where it's like.

0:56:15.360 --> 0:56:19.399
<v Speaker 6>I generally feel good that they know what they have,

0:56:21.040 --> 0:56:22.880
<v Speaker 6>even if it's not Duke to your point, like one

0:56:22.960 --> 0:56:25.120
<v Speaker 6>hundred percent sure, I just don't know if you have

0:56:25.239 --> 0:56:27.560
<v Speaker 6>the luxury of that at the same time, because you

0:56:27.640 --> 0:56:31.840
<v Speaker 6>could sell high now on like a Billy Carlson, and

0:56:32.080 --> 0:56:34.399
<v Speaker 6>maybe Billy Carlson never puts him an ops over seven

0:56:34.400 --> 0:56:35.920
<v Speaker 6>to fifty in his career, but someone else.

0:56:35.800 --> 0:56:36.759
<v Speaker 2>Believes he could.

0:56:37.200 --> 0:56:40.960
<v Speaker 6>So it's that is just such a hard balance though

0:56:41.080 --> 0:56:42.920
<v Speaker 6>to strike. I don't think there's a right answer to

0:56:42.960 --> 0:56:44.320
<v Speaker 6>this either way at the same.

0:56:44.160 --> 0:56:48.279
<v Speaker 5>Time, so I guess in your everything you said right

0:56:48.320 --> 0:56:53.319
<v Speaker 5>there was correct. I definitely see both sides of it.

0:56:53.440 --> 0:56:55.319
<v Speaker 5>The one thing, like the one that will always stick

0:56:55.320 --> 0:56:59.280
<v Speaker 5>in my craw is how much the A's loved Andrew

0:56:59.360 --> 0:57:03.000
<v Speaker 5>Vaughn and how badly I wanted us to swing a

0:57:03.040 --> 0:57:05.719
<v Speaker 5>deal to get Shay Langliers to Chicago just based on

0:57:05.760 --> 0:57:08.279
<v Speaker 5>what the fuck he's doing now. I've been god, I

0:57:08.360 --> 0:57:10.239
<v Speaker 5>was such a huge h Angliers fan, So like, I

0:57:10.719 --> 0:57:13.640
<v Speaker 5>see that end of it too, of holding on too long,

0:57:13.680 --> 0:57:15.719
<v Speaker 5>because look at what the hell Andrew Baugh got us.

0:57:15.800 --> 0:57:17.600
<v Speaker 5>Like I had to go to Miller Park and see

0:57:17.600 --> 0:57:20.520
<v Speaker 5>a banner of Andrew vaugh and that shit made me disgusted.

0:57:20.800 --> 0:57:25.080
<v Speaker 5>So it was it was really hard to stomach that. So, like,

0:57:25.120 --> 0:57:27.560
<v Speaker 5>I see both sides of it. I guess biggest thing,

0:57:27.720 --> 0:57:31.480
<v Speaker 5>Like with where we are right now, my ideal, uh,

0:57:31.520 --> 0:57:34.600
<v Speaker 5>my ideal thing would be bringing in as many of

0:57:34.640 --> 0:57:38.240
<v Speaker 5>these top well producing prospects that have worked well in

0:57:38.280 --> 0:57:42.439
<v Speaker 5>the minors into camp into spring training this upcoming year

0:57:42.600 --> 0:57:46.160
<v Speaker 5>as we can and seeing what the hell competition can

0:57:46.200 --> 0:57:48.640
<v Speaker 5>bring out of some of these guys. And then once

0:57:48.680 --> 0:57:50.480
<v Speaker 5>we kind of have an idea of seeing these guys

0:57:50.520 --> 0:57:54.080
<v Speaker 5>compete day to day during the spring and seeing, you know,

0:57:54.160 --> 0:57:57.480
<v Speaker 5>kind of seeing what we have hands on against some

0:57:57.720 --> 0:57:58.200
<v Speaker 5>form of.

0:57:58.240 --> 0:57:59.360
<v Speaker 1>MLB type talent.

0:58:00.320 --> 0:58:02.960
<v Speaker 5>I think, then you go into next year, maybe that's

0:58:02.960 --> 0:58:04.480
<v Speaker 5>when you would feel That's when I would feel a

0:58:04.480 --> 0:58:06.600
<v Speaker 5>little bit better going into the deadline and possibly making

0:58:06.640 --> 0:58:08.800
<v Speaker 5>a move or then going into that following off season

0:58:08.880 --> 0:58:10.960
<v Speaker 5>and then really just going all the way in. I

0:58:11.080 --> 0:58:13.440
<v Speaker 5>just I want to see what these guys that are

0:58:13.440 --> 0:58:15.960
<v Speaker 5>doing well in the minors can do at a major

0:58:16.040 --> 0:58:18.440
<v Speaker 5>league camp or with a you know, even a triple

0:58:18.480 --> 0:58:22.880
<v Speaker 5>A opportunity. The Billy Carlson thing does keep me a

0:58:22.880 --> 0:58:27.480
<v Speaker 5>little bit nervous, but I guess it really shouldn't, considering

0:58:27.560 --> 0:58:30.000
<v Speaker 5>the White Sox are so dead set on guys playing

0:58:30.040 --> 0:58:32.000
<v Speaker 5>the positions they were drafted to play like that is

0:58:32.000 --> 0:58:34.240
<v Speaker 5>one thing that drives me absolutely nuts about this about

0:58:34.240 --> 0:58:37.360
<v Speaker 5>our minor league system, about not giving a short a

0:58:37.360 --> 0:58:39.800
<v Speaker 5>guy who's drafted as a shortstop opportunities in the outfield,

0:58:39.840 --> 0:58:41.880
<v Speaker 5>because like, if we're drowning of any part of the prospect,

0:58:41.920 --> 0:58:43.600
<v Speaker 5>but we're drowning in the outfield, why do we not

0:58:43.680 --> 0:58:46.040
<v Speaker 5>have more infielders in our minor league system playing in

0:58:46.080 --> 0:58:48.120
<v Speaker 5>the outfield to at least see what we have? That

0:58:48.200 --> 0:58:52.479
<v Speaker 5>drives me nuts. But taking that into account, I guess yes,

0:58:52.600 --> 0:58:54.680
<v Speaker 5>I would be a little bit more. I'd be a

0:58:54.720 --> 0:58:58.320
<v Speaker 5>lot more less hesitant to make a move knowing that's

0:58:58.320 --> 0:59:01.120
<v Speaker 5>how we're operating. But I mean, to your guys point,

0:59:01.280 --> 0:59:03.560
<v Speaker 5>like you said earlier, Las like, why is a guy

0:59:03.560 --> 0:59:06.439
<v Speaker 5>like Jakemignzalis not getting reps in the outfield, knowing damn well,

0:59:06.480 --> 0:59:10.000
<v Speaker 5>how badly we need outfield that, you know, So if

0:59:10.000 --> 0:59:12.160
<v Speaker 5>that's how we're going to maneuver, that'd probably be my

0:59:12.200 --> 0:59:14.400
<v Speaker 5>biggest That's my biggest gripe with Gets. The way he's

0:59:14.400 --> 0:59:16.240
<v Speaker 5>done this so far is not trying to get these

0:59:16.240 --> 0:59:21.040
<v Speaker 5>guys playing other positions. But yeah, I guess I'm still

0:59:21.760 --> 0:59:24.040
<v Speaker 5>to fully answer my question. I'm still on the side

0:59:24.080 --> 0:59:25.760
<v Speaker 5>of I want to see what these guys are bring

0:59:25.840 --> 0:59:29.240
<v Speaker 5>him into camp next year, Give these guys direct competition,

0:59:29.400 --> 0:59:31.360
<v Speaker 5>see what they can do against some major league level

0:59:32.720 --> 0:59:35.880
<v Speaker 5>pitching or you know, how they can pitch against major

0:59:35.960 --> 0:59:38.440
<v Speaker 5>league level hitting, you know, quote unquote with a spring

0:59:38.480 --> 0:59:41.840
<v Speaker 5>training roster, but a you know, forty man roster, and

0:59:41.880 --> 0:59:43.640
<v Speaker 5>then kind of go from there. And then I think

0:59:43.680 --> 0:59:46.840
<v Speaker 5>going into the deadline next year, if everything's looking good

0:59:46.880 --> 0:59:50.320
<v Speaker 5>and we don't have to worry about any prospects completely

0:59:50.400 --> 0:59:53.080
<v Speaker 5>you know, tanking completely, and then we have to look

0:59:53.120 --> 0:59:54.840
<v Speaker 5>into our project pool to see if we can find

0:59:54.880 --> 0:59:55.800
<v Speaker 5>another cornerstone.

0:59:56.160 --> 0:59:56.280
<v Speaker 3>Uh.

0:59:56.400 --> 0:59:59.080
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, they start making moves at next year's deadline. I

0:59:59.160 --> 1:00:01.560
<v Speaker 5>just I like to be sure, and I like to

1:00:03.120 --> 1:00:04.680
<v Speaker 5>I'd just like to have a little bit more tape

1:00:04.680 --> 1:00:08.040
<v Speaker 5>on our prospect system than we currently have, because how

1:00:08.080 --> 1:00:10.400
<v Speaker 5>does a Jacob Gonzalez come out of nowhere? You know,

1:00:10.520 --> 1:00:14.240
<v Speaker 5>he could have easily been traded for nothing last season,

1:00:14.600 --> 1:00:16.680
<v Speaker 5>you know what I mean, And by having him in

1:00:16.760 --> 1:00:19.760
<v Speaker 5>the major minor league system in this season, yes, he

1:00:19.800 --> 1:00:21.320
<v Speaker 5>does have a lot of trade mail you now because

1:00:21.320 --> 1:00:21.920
<v Speaker 5>of what he's shown.

1:00:22.520 --> 1:00:24.640
<v Speaker 6>I actually like this comment I just put up from

1:00:24.680 --> 1:00:28.120
<v Speaker 6>our YouTube chat for those who are listening after the

1:00:28.160 --> 1:00:28.920
<v Speaker 6>fact we are lying.

1:00:28.960 --> 1:00:31.120
<v Speaker 1>That is actually a very good comment. I like it.

1:00:32.120 --> 1:00:34.160
<v Speaker 6>I am I will read it to those who might

1:00:34.160 --> 1:00:35.760
<v Speaker 6>be just listening to the podcast. You have to be

1:00:35.800 --> 1:00:39.160
<v Speaker 6>sustainable enough to be able to make mistakes and take risks,

1:00:39.200 --> 1:00:40.920
<v Speaker 6>and I think that's where.

1:00:42.160 --> 1:00:44.080
<v Speaker 2>I think Chris guests can still.

1:00:43.840 --> 1:00:49.080
<v Speaker 6>Do something with that this this trade de line, Like

1:00:49.120 --> 1:00:51.480
<v Speaker 6>he doesn't have to go over the moon and trade

1:00:51.520 --> 1:00:54.240
<v Speaker 6>the farm for this crew, but you do have to

1:00:54.280 --> 1:00:58.600
<v Speaker 6>show the guys you have on the field that you

1:00:58.760 --> 1:01:06.800
<v Speaker 6>have enough belief in them to say that, you know,

1:01:07.040 --> 1:01:10.360
<v Speaker 6>we want to see what you guys can do when

1:01:10.360 --> 1:01:13.280
<v Speaker 6>the pressure is still on. Heading towards September, October, Like,

1:01:13.360 --> 1:01:16.040
<v Speaker 6>I think you can do that in a nice enough

1:01:16.120 --> 1:01:22.640
<v Speaker 6>way to where you take a calculator risk. I think

1:01:22.920 --> 1:01:26.480
<v Speaker 6>what this person was getting at. Yeah, like I said,

1:01:26.520 --> 1:01:28.480
<v Speaker 6>to those who are listening after the fact, or listening

1:01:28.560 --> 1:01:34.120
<v Speaker 6>on Spotify or Apple Music whatever, like we're live on Sunday,

1:01:34.200 --> 1:01:36.600
<v Speaker 6>so you can start throwing your comments in here too,

1:01:36.600 --> 1:01:38.800
<v Speaker 6>and we'll start talking about them too. So, thinking to

1:01:38.800 --> 1:01:40.120
<v Speaker 6>those who were doing it today, I thought that was

1:01:40.160 --> 1:01:41.720
<v Speaker 6>a great one as we were kind of getting close

1:01:41.760 --> 1:01:42.320
<v Speaker 6>to wrapping here.

1:01:43.680 --> 1:01:43.880
<v Speaker 1>Nice.

1:01:45.400 --> 1:01:48.120
<v Speaker 6>You know, I've learned a thing or two about this,

1:01:48.560 --> 1:01:50.200
<v Speaker 6>you know, having a fill in his host every now

1:01:50.200 --> 1:01:53.080
<v Speaker 6>and again. I got some good plugs here who has

1:01:53.240 --> 1:01:58.000
<v Speaker 6>responsibilities to be able to pull this one up. I

1:01:58.040 --> 1:02:02.040
<v Speaker 6>was just about to say Joe's and about us losing

1:02:02.360 --> 1:02:04.920
<v Speaker 6>us Montini losing in the playoffs is not going to

1:02:04.920 --> 1:02:06.120
<v Speaker 6>be pulled up on the screen.

1:02:05.880 --> 1:02:08.280
<v Speaker 2>Well time someone else here is allowed to do it.

1:02:08.240 --> 1:02:10.240
<v Speaker 5>Except to the folks listening at home.

1:02:10.640 --> 1:02:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Uh socks.

1:02:11.200 --> 1:02:14.600
<v Speaker 5>On thirty fifth own, Joe has commented, and I want

1:02:14.600 --> 1:02:16.800
<v Speaker 5>to make sure that everybody listening to this on a

1:02:16.920 --> 1:02:19.720
<v Speaker 5>podcast somewhere can can make sure they're taking this all

1:02:19.760 --> 1:02:22.640
<v Speaker 5>don should be Should we be worried about the lads

1:02:22.760 --> 1:02:25.680
<v Speaker 5>lab at Motini. My sources to say, another playoff loss

1:02:25.680 --> 1:02:27.240
<v Speaker 5>has the fans a little restless.

1:02:27.680 --> 1:02:29.800
<v Speaker 6>Your sources are your sources are off. I don't know

1:02:29.840 --> 1:02:32.919
<v Speaker 6>where you're getting that from. The things are great over

1:02:32.960 --> 1:02:35.600
<v Speaker 6>the good old Montini. No, just that's always a bad

1:02:35.680 --> 1:02:37.960
<v Speaker 6>end of the year, right, But all right, We've got to.

1:02:37.920 --> 1:02:40.080
<v Speaker 5>See a little long this episode, but I think overall

1:02:40.160 --> 1:02:41.160
<v Speaker 5>covered quite a bit here.

1:02:41.760 --> 1:02:43.360
<v Speaker 1>It's nice to have the band back together.

1:02:43.400 --> 1:02:44.920
<v Speaker 5>I don't know if that got caught in my freaking

1:02:45.000 --> 1:02:50.160
<v Speaker 5>intro before I got, you know, completely nuked, But regardless,

1:02:50.560 --> 1:02:52.600
<v Speaker 5>ladies and gentlemen, that's all we have this week for

1:02:52.640 --> 1:02:54.960
<v Speaker 5>the Socks on thirty fifth podcast. Be sure it subscribed

1:02:54.960 --> 1:02:57.400
<v Speaker 5>to the podcast, Apple, Spotify, YouTube and anywhere else in

1:02:57.480 --> 1:03:00.560
<v Speaker 5>your podcast, I'll sure to pop one I've stream on

1:03:00.600 --> 1:03:03.160
<v Speaker 5>YouTube to definitely leave some comments about laz.

1:03:03.200 --> 1:03:04.200
<v Speaker 1>We always appreciate that.

1:03:04.720 --> 1:03:06.720
<v Speaker 5>Also, sure check out the website socks on thirty fifth

1:03:06.760 --> 1:03:08.600
<v Speaker 5>dot com, as well as following us on Facebook, Twitter,

1:03:08.640 --> 1:03:10.880
<v Speaker 5>and Instagram at socks on thirty fifth six Date with

1:03:10.920 --> 1:03:14.040
<v Speaker 5>the Old Chica White Sox. To make you feel better, lads, Honestly,

1:03:14.040 --> 1:03:16.600
<v Speaker 5>I'm surprised I have not gotten more flag from uh

1:03:16.680 --> 1:03:19.400
<v Speaker 5>socks Twitter in these comments yet, so it's it'll be

1:03:19.480 --> 1:03:20.000
<v Speaker 5>evened out.

1:03:20.080 --> 1:03:23.040
<v Speaker 1>I guarantee it. This has been due Cofflin joined by

1:03:23.120 --> 1:03:24.360
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Lezowski and Nick Auor.

1:03:24.400 --> 1:03:26.800
<v Speaker 5>We'll be back as we cover another week of White

1:03:26.800 --> 1:03:27.600
<v Speaker 5>Sox baseball.

1:03:27.600 --> 1:03:30.600
<v Speaker 1>We'll be back soon, sooner than you think. Thank you

1:03:30.680 --> 1:03:31.680
<v Speaker 1>and go Socks