WEBVTT - 3/22, Part 1: Starting Pitching with Pitchers List

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast, and remember, if you

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>want to listen live, download the I Heart Radio app,

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>download the tune and app and just search for Fantasy

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Network and you could listen to this program live. Also,

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>if you want to watch the video of this podcast,

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:20.959
<v Speaker 1>check us out on YouTube, on twitch, or on Periscope

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and type in you guess did Fantasy Sports Network. You'll

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:28.160
<v Speaker 1>find us there. Enjoy the show and thanks for listening.

0:00:30.200 --> 0:00:38.760
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Fantasy Best

0:00:38.800 --> 0:00:52.280
<v Speaker 1>Friends Forever. M Do do Do Do Do Do Do

0:00:52.000 --> 0:01:00.200
<v Speaker 1>Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do do do doo? Yeah? Oh,

0:01:00.280 --> 0:01:05.040
<v Speaker 1>this is the Fantasy Best Friends Forever here on the

0:01:05.080 --> 0:01:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Sports already a network alongside for Frankie Stample, I

0:01:08.959 --> 0:01:13.960
<v Speaker 1>am Greg Susman. Frank's about reggae t G I f

0:01:14.120 --> 0:01:19.280
<v Speaker 1>happy Friday. It is a happy Friday Franky for Greg Susman.

0:01:20.560 --> 0:01:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Tirps our marching on Greg, Sure our baby sure ours

0:01:25.160 --> 0:01:28.800
<v Speaker 1>to the dismay of my bracket. And you, Frank and

0:01:28.840 --> 0:01:34.320
<v Speaker 1>you what about me? Oh m, you I think you're

0:01:34.319 --> 0:01:39.080
<v Speaker 1>saying you were also not happy? Why not? Because you

0:01:39.160 --> 0:01:42.280
<v Speaker 1>rooted against me heavily. I mean it didn't really matter.

0:01:42.360 --> 0:01:44.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't care that much about Belmont. Now now he

0:01:44.760 --> 0:01:47.280
<v Speaker 1>doesn't care about Belmont. This is unbelievable. Look at this guy.

0:01:47.560 --> 0:01:51.280
<v Speaker 1>One was ready to buy a bruined sweatshirt yesterday. Now

0:01:51.360 --> 0:01:53.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't really care about Belmont. Well, yeah, they want

0:01:53.120 --> 0:01:57.000
<v Speaker 1>to be a million bucks. Sure, Greg Brackett would have

0:01:57.040 --> 0:02:00.000
<v Speaker 1>been billion bucks he wasn't Warren Buffetts and everything else?

0:02:00.000 --> 0:02:02.840
<v Speaker 1>School last night for you? You all right? Billy Joel

0:02:02.920 --> 0:02:06.480
<v Speaker 1>was fun. That was last night. Yeah, it's a crazy

0:02:06.520 --> 0:02:09.960
<v Speaker 1>day yesterday. Man, I mean, like like Survivor, I lost everything,

0:02:10.080 --> 0:02:13.679
<v Speaker 1>which is great. Um, that's okay, marilynd once what I

0:02:13.720 --> 0:02:16.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna do it? Billy Joel was great. Bavonio appreciate this.

0:02:16.200 --> 0:02:19.160
<v Speaker 1>John Fogerty came out in the middle of Billy Joel concert.

0:02:19.360 --> 0:02:22.480
<v Speaker 1>That was awesome. Do you you know who John is?

0:02:22.520 --> 0:02:25.320
<v Speaker 1>No way right? Do you can play some John Fogerty

0:02:25.360 --> 0:02:30.480
<v Speaker 1>really some CCR bovona that would be very helpful. Um. Yes,

0:02:30.639 --> 0:02:32.640
<v Speaker 1>that was awesome And literally in the middle of the show.

0:02:32.960 --> 0:02:35.400
<v Speaker 1>Every I my good friend John Fogerty, Oh my god,

0:02:36.000 --> 0:02:40.919
<v Speaker 1>that's awesome. So it was a great I and Frank

0:02:41.200 --> 0:02:43.600
<v Speaker 1>I have to tell you they went to bed after

0:02:43.639 --> 0:02:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Syracuse lost last night sing a song that this John

0:02:47.160 --> 0:02:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Fogerty fortunate son, what fortunate son? It's um. I'm trying

0:02:56.040 --> 0:02:57.480
<v Speaker 1>to figure out if I know what you know? You

0:02:57.680 --> 0:03:02.799
<v Speaker 1>really heard this person's name before made for the band

0:03:03.360 --> 0:03:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Oh that Red one Blue I do. I'm not just

0:03:08.080 --> 0:03:13.880
<v Speaker 1>saying that the videos at you just heard me Billy

0:03:13.919 --> 0:03:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Joel last night. It's the ants I wore as I

0:03:17.200 --> 0:03:20.440
<v Speaker 1>wore song anyway, I have to tell you that it

0:03:20.520 --> 0:03:23.400
<v Speaker 1>wasn't bed after the Syracuse came last night about midnight

0:03:23.400 --> 0:03:26.320
<v Speaker 1>ish or so and listen to me. It took me

0:03:26.639 --> 0:03:29.080
<v Speaker 1>strangely long time to get home, but finally got home,

0:03:29.120 --> 0:03:30.680
<v Speaker 1>I watch the end of the Syracuse game, I went

0:03:30.720 --> 0:03:33.720
<v Speaker 1>to bed. I have not slept as well in I

0:03:33.760 --> 0:03:37.000
<v Speaker 1>can't tell you how long. No, I did not wake

0:03:37.080 --> 0:03:38.560
<v Speaker 1>up to my long one off, and I woke up

0:03:38.600 --> 0:03:41.360
<v Speaker 1>so refreshed as a wow. I think you had this

0:03:41.360 --> 0:03:43.200
<v Speaker 1>warning if you drink last night, had a cold beers

0:03:43.720 --> 0:03:46.080
<v Speaker 1>had had a cold home, But it wasn't like. I

0:03:46.120 --> 0:03:49.280
<v Speaker 1>woke up feeling right like I had a beer here

0:03:50.160 --> 0:03:52.480
<v Speaker 1>um to celebrate, and then I had a beer at

0:03:52.480 --> 0:03:55.800
<v Speaker 1>the concert. That was it just col just too and

0:03:56.160 --> 0:04:00.880
<v Speaker 1>I slept. I had a weird dream that intersected wrestling

0:04:01.080 --> 0:04:04.240
<v Speaker 1>with Game of Thrones, which is kind of cool. Like

0:04:04.320 --> 0:04:06.520
<v Speaker 1>some of these wrestlers were like down, but like their

0:04:06.560 --> 0:04:09.760
<v Speaker 1>eyes were like it was like frozen and they blew

0:04:09.840 --> 0:04:15.000
<v Speaker 1>like the night the Yeah, yeah, it's like it was awesome.

0:04:15.040 --> 0:04:17.720
<v Speaker 1>I woke up. So I woke up. This wasn't dreaming

0:04:17.720 --> 0:04:22.640
<v Speaker 1>about work. I woke up feeling incredibly like refreshed and

0:04:22.720 --> 0:04:25.039
<v Speaker 1>I ready to go. And I had to say, like,

0:04:25.080 --> 0:04:26.640
<v Speaker 1>it's not normally how I feel on Monday's Like on

0:04:26.680 --> 0:04:28.039
<v Speaker 1>Monday I wake up, I'm like, all right, I'm ready

0:04:28.040 --> 0:04:29.760
<v Speaker 1>for the week, and then by Tuesday Wednesday, it's like

0:04:29.800 --> 0:04:33.800
<v Speaker 1>a disaster. Today I woke up feeling great. Of course,

0:04:33.839 --> 0:04:35.839
<v Speaker 1>I woke up to a text message from Vona saying

0:04:36.120 --> 0:04:39.480
<v Speaker 1>water was everything and everything was broken. That wasn't great.

0:04:40.760 --> 0:04:43.920
<v Speaker 1>Um sorry, yeah, yeah, it's basically the window popped open

0:04:43.920 --> 0:04:46.240
<v Speaker 1>because the ball the wind last night and all the

0:04:46.320 --> 0:04:49.200
<v Speaker 1>rain came on everything on the remote side. Everything was

0:04:49.240 --> 0:04:52.680
<v Speaker 1>down this morning. First I'm hearing about this, Frank, your

0:04:52.680 --> 0:04:56.200
<v Speaker 1>life seems to be good. Um, come in, put my

0:04:56.200 --> 0:04:58.960
<v Speaker 1>head down, do my job. Leave is happy to be

0:04:59.000 --> 0:05:01.920
<v Speaker 1>here exactly, So so I walked in. Carl fixed everything,

0:05:02.480 --> 0:05:05.279
<v Speaker 1>and I decided that I'm gonna I'm sticking to my

0:05:05.320 --> 0:05:08.480
<v Speaker 1>word by pizza for everybody for lunch. After we're done.

0:05:09.000 --> 0:05:11.560
<v Speaker 1>There were records and videos. They're gonna go out and

0:05:11.560 --> 0:05:14.320
<v Speaker 1>watch college basketball and it's gonna be a great day. Yeah.

0:05:14.360 --> 0:05:16.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't really care as much about college basketball, but

0:05:16.640 --> 0:05:18.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm as long as you're happy, I'm happy. But now

0:05:18.360 --> 0:05:20.839
<v Speaker 1>now you're happy. That now that's straight. So tomorrow at

0:05:20.880 --> 0:05:24.480
<v Speaker 1>twelve ten, when Maryland plays L s U O M,

0:05:24.640 --> 0:05:25.920
<v Speaker 1>whill you be ready for because you don't have it. You

0:05:25.880 --> 0:05:29.680
<v Speaker 1>You don't have LS you and your bracket either. I'll

0:05:29.680 --> 0:05:32.880
<v Speaker 1>be ready for you. Greg, Frank you here, Frank you

0:05:32.920 --> 0:05:35.520
<v Speaker 1>can you can? You can clip that out, save and

0:05:35.520 --> 0:05:41.960
<v Speaker 1>play whatever you want. Please do. Let's go terps. When

0:05:42.000 --> 0:05:44.000
<v Speaker 1>I tell you they get the expend sixteen, they are home,

0:05:44.320 --> 0:05:49.560
<v Speaker 1>I guess Michigan State. What else is the spot you

0:05:49.560 --> 0:05:51.680
<v Speaker 1>want to be in? Absolutely, normally I told you that,

0:05:51.720 --> 0:05:54.720
<v Speaker 1>I told you this. Normally I bitch about the bracket.

0:05:55.040 --> 0:05:57.480
<v Speaker 1>I will I bitch and I moan and I complain

0:05:58.200 --> 0:06:01.320
<v Speaker 1>that they got screening the a screwed up draw and listen,

0:06:01.400 --> 0:06:04.159
<v Speaker 1>I'm annoyed that they're in Duke side, of course, but

0:06:04.440 --> 0:06:09.760
<v Speaker 1>playing d C not get screwed. It didn't. I'm very

0:06:09.760 --> 0:06:13.599
<v Speaker 1>excited again, Greg, as long as you're happy. That's not

0:06:13.640 --> 0:06:18.880
<v Speaker 1>true pollocks here, isn't it? I think so? Having guys high,

0:06:18.880 --> 0:06:21.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry you hear all that you have any college

0:06:22.400 --> 0:06:25.560
<v Speaker 1>relation or anything regarding brackets that you want to get

0:06:25.560 --> 0:06:29.080
<v Speaker 1>off your chest before we act. My sister went to Michigan,

0:06:29.360 --> 0:06:33.800
<v Speaker 1>so I'm a I'm a huge Michigan fani. Let's do it. Yeah,

0:06:34.680 --> 0:06:36.440
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna win this year. This is it, we finally

0:06:36.440 --> 0:06:40.000
<v Speaker 1>got it, has more swag than anyone else. Everything's great, Honestly,

0:06:40.000 --> 0:06:42.000
<v Speaker 1>I kind of want Eggy to die, but that's okay.

0:06:42.440 --> 0:06:47.480
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, come on, man, I hate that guy. I

0:06:47.560 --> 0:06:50.920
<v Speaker 1>really really really hate that guy. You know some prestigious college.

0:06:51.440 --> 0:06:53.960
<v Speaker 1>I went to Brandeis University, so we're not really a

0:06:54.080 --> 0:06:57.799
<v Speaker 1>D one school and we actually don't have a football team,

0:06:58.120 --> 0:07:01.200
<v Speaker 1>so pretty easy to refer Michigan. Yeah, that's fair, to

0:07:01.200 --> 0:07:06.360
<v Speaker 1>be honest, Greg, I've never heard of it. Right, it's

0:07:06.440 --> 0:07:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Nelson Figueroa. He went there. I it's ten miles due

0:07:10.280 --> 0:07:15.320
<v Speaker 1>west of Boston. Oh, it's not like it's I don't

0:07:15.320 --> 0:07:19.040
<v Speaker 1>really consider like Harvard or like you of Boston College,

0:07:19.040 --> 0:07:21.680
<v Speaker 1>and brandis is all right, that's fair, that's fair. What's

0:07:21.680 --> 0:07:24.680
<v Speaker 1>going on well a little bit worse because in my

0:07:24.720 --> 0:07:27.360
<v Speaker 1>college is just all right now. I like brand No,

0:07:27.440 --> 0:07:29.160
<v Speaker 1>I like Branda. I'm saying, it's not like I don't.

0:07:29.280 --> 0:07:32.160
<v Speaker 1>They don't like my passing around. I'm having fun, you know,

0:07:32.200 --> 0:07:33.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm great. Frank. I was really good to see you

0:07:33.600 --> 0:07:35.720
<v Speaker 1>at at Towers last week. It was a lot of fun.

0:07:35.760 --> 0:07:38.000
<v Speaker 1>It's not great to see me, n I saw you well.

0:07:38.320 --> 0:07:40.440
<v Speaker 1>I talked to Frank a lot. You just you gave

0:07:40.440 --> 0:07:44.200
<v Speaker 1>me the handshake and you went away busy. I think

0:07:44.240 --> 0:07:48.360
<v Speaker 1>they do. And I understand that Peters doesn't. He doesn't

0:07:48.360 --> 0:07:51.320
<v Speaker 1>want to chat. I went over to Fully's and we

0:07:51.320 --> 0:07:54.520
<v Speaker 1>were chatting it up. We got to guarding Chris Archer

0:07:54.640 --> 0:07:57.200
<v Speaker 1>talking about some other pictures as well. So but it

0:07:57.280 --> 0:07:59.760
<v Speaker 1>was a great time here on Friday at spring creening

0:07:59.840 --> 0:08:02.480
<v Speaker 1>is kind of coming to a head here Greg. We

0:08:02.560 --> 0:08:06.000
<v Speaker 1>can so there's a little there's there's more things sorted out.

0:08:06.800 --> 0:08:07.960
<v Speaker 1>So I thought it was a good time to get

0:08:08.040 --> 0:08:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Nick Cone talk about and do you want to I

0:08:13.600 --> 0:08:15.120
<v Speaker 1>do want a quick on the day before we get

0:08:15.120 --> 0:08:17.160
<v Speaker 1>in a pocket. I honestly desperately needed this to be

0:08:17.160 --> 0:08:18.840
<v Speaker 1>have a draft Sunday. We're gonna do the draft lottery

0:08:18.880 --> 0:08:22.160
<v Speaker 1>coming up an hour to um. But I definitely needed

0:08:22.360 --> 0:08:24.280
<v Speaker 1>to talk to you today, Nick, because Frank came in

0:08:24.320 --> 0:08:25.840
<v Speaker 1>here this morning. He's like, hey, like I gives Nick's

0:08:25.920 --> 0:08:27.280
<v Speaker 1>ideas and what I wanted to talk about? Like you

0:08:27.280 --> 0:08:29.080
<v Speaker 1>have any ideas, Frank? I have not looked at bat

0:08:29.120 --> 0:08:34.079
<v Speaker 1>baseball three days, like college basketball, so focused. So who

0:08:34.080 --> 0:08:35.760
<v Speaker 1>you talking about? Like? Are you kidding me? Right now?

0:08:36.040 --> 0:08:37.360
<v Speaker 1>This is what you think my head is at. So

0:08:37.400 --> 0:08:40.760
<v Speaker 1>thank god you are on this program to help me

0:08:41.000 --> 0:08:44.959
<v Speaker 1>get back. I need it, man, I need it. So um.

0:08:45.120 --> 0:08:49.960
<v Speaker 1>Big story command of yesterday to me is the news

0:08:50.160 --> 0:08:55.040
<v Speaker 1>regarding Corey Kennebell and he has a something with the UCL.

0:08:55.080 --> 0:08:58.040
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't seem fully torn, seems partially torn. They don't

0:08:58.040 --> 0:09:00.160
<v Speaker 1>know that it's Tommy John but it's not great up

0:09:00.679 --> 0:09:05.560
<v Speaker 1>and that means Knable's hurt. That means Jeremy Jeffers is hurt.

0:09:06.000 --> 0:09:07.840
<v Speaker 1>And Craig Counsel came out and said, yeah, we can't

0:09:07.920 --> 0:09:10.640
<v Speaker 1>use Josh had the same way that we've been using him,

0:09:10.640 --> 0:09:14.400
<v Speaker 1>which means we maybe look at Josh Hayter as a

0:09:14.440 --> 0:09:20.000
<v Speaker 1>closer unless Gregg Kimberll gets signed by Milwaukee, a lot

0:09:20.080 --> 0:09:22.199
<v Speaker 1>of question marks, Frank, when it comes to Milwaukee will

0:09:22.200 --> 0:09:24.800
<v Speaker 1>then Yeah. I mean it started with Jeffers a couple

0:09:24.800 --> 0:09:26.920
<v Speaker 1>of weeks ago. Now Corey Kinnable. I was starting to

0:09:26.920 --> 0:09:29.360
<v Speaker 1>move Knable up my draft board because once Jeffers goes

0:09:29.360 --> 0:09:31.760
<v Speaker 1>down it seemed like there was a clearer path and

0:09:31.800 --> 0:09:34.080
<v Speaker 1>I think a DP kind of reflected that as well,

0:09:34.600 --> 0:09:36.760
<v Speaker 1>with Cannable moving up the draft board a little bit.

0:09:36.800 --> 0:09:39.719
<v Speaker 1>But now with this issue, look, I can't even touch, uh,

0:09:39.800 --> 0:09:42.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, or think about drafting Corey Kinnable. It doesn't

0:09:42.640 --> 0:09:46.000
<v Speaker 1>sound good with this UCL issue. They've been talking to

0:09:46.280 --> 0:09:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Craig Kimberl will see what happens there. But as of now,

0:09:51.080 --> 0:09:52.959
<v Speaker 1>like if the season started today and they're in the

0:09:53.000 --> 0:09:55.679
<v Speaker 1>same opportunity, I think it's going to Josh Hayder. So

0:09:55.840 --> 0:09:57.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'll kind of throw this back your way,

0:09:57.520 --> 0:09:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Greg and we'll get nixed thoughts in it as well.

0:10:00.280 --> 0:10:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Josh Hayter, what are the closer? And we knew going

0:10:03.040 --> 0:10:06.160
<v Speaker 1>in that he was, I mean he would he would

0:10:06.160 --> 0:10:08.360
<v Speaker 1>be one of the top of three relievers drafted off

0:10:08.360 --> 0:10:10.199
<v Speaker 1>the board at least it might be. I agree, you

0:10:10.200 --> 0:10:12.280
<v Speaker 1>could go ahead and chat. You could lock up that

0:10:12.400 --> 0:10:14.959
<v Speaker 1>Josh Hayter was something beady closer all season long and

0:10:15.040 --> 0:10:17.840
<v Speaker 1>get you your fifty saves or whatnot. He would be

0:10:17.880 --> 0:10:20.079
<v Speaker 1>the top of the lead off the board, top three.

0:10:20.120 --> 0:10:23.120
<v Speaker 1>I completely agree with you. Now, if they signed Kimbroll,

0:10:23.280 --> 0:10:25.200
<v Speaker 1>it's not a disaster because Hayter is gonna be a hater,

0:10:25.520 --> 0:10:28.480
<v Speaker 1>but you probably won't steal many saves as he would

0:10:28.520 --> 0:10:30.719
<v Speaker 1>have with a Connabel with the Jefferies in the back

0:10:30.800 --> 0:10:32.880
<v Speaker 1>end of the bullpen. With Kimberal, Nick, you have to

0:10:32.880 --> 0:10:36.079
<v Speaker 1>believe that Kimberal's the guy hater is gonna have his role,

0:10:36.120 --> 0:10:38.680
<v Speaker 1>which is fine, but it's kind of submithed as a

0:10:38.679 --> 0:10:42.160
<v Speaker 1>middle innings guy. Yeah. No, I agree with all of this.

0:10:42.480 --> 0:10:45.600
<v Speaker 1>I really firmly believe kimber will go to the Brewers.

0:10:45.679 --> 0:10:47.680
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't It makes the most sense in the world.

0:10:47.720 --> 0:10:49.559
<v Speaker 1>Kimberro has often said that he doesn't want to sit out.

0:10:49.600 --> 0:10:51.520
<v Speaker 1>He wants to play this year. He'll take a one

0:10:51.600 --> 0:10:53.760
<v Speaker 1>year deal. If the Brewers want off from that, he'll

0:10:53.760 --> 0:10:55.120
<v Speaker 1>take it. He just wants to get going. It's a

0:10:55.120 --> 0:10:57.760
<v Speaker 1>week away from the season. I I guarantee you they

0:10:57.800 --> 0:11:01.240
<v Speaker 1>were talking last week. They're just finalizing the contra right now. Kimberrell,

0:11:01.480 --> 0:11:05.120
<v Speaker 1>I would say, plus chance, he's he's closing for the Brewers.

0:11:05.480 --> 0:11:07.520
<v Speaker 1>So if you want to take the chance on Hater

0:11:07.640 --> 0:11:11.040
<v Speaker 1>now with the Knebel news, that's fair. I would be

0:11:11.120 --> 0:11:13.360
<v Speaker 1>very surprised if he actually does turn into that night

0:11:13.480 --> 0:11:15.240
<v Speaker 1>in the Guy. Now. There is one thing that is

0:11:15.320 --> 0:11:17.520
<v Speaker 1>very interesting to me that ties into all of this

0:11:18.360 --> 0:11:21.199
<v Speaker 1>is Council came out and said the starting rotation for

0:11:21.240 --> 0:11:25.200
<v Speaker 1>the Brewers, it's not what we expected. Chase Anderson is out,

0:11:25.679 --> 0:11:28.480
<v Speaker 1>we have Corbyn Burns in there, we Brandon Woodriffin there,

0:11:28.480 --> 0:11:30.680
<v Speaker 1>we have peral to all these high upside guys are

0:11:30.679 --> 0:11:33.840
<v Speaker 1>in there. And it's a little surprising given that Jefferson

0:11:33.920 --> 0:11:36.480
<v Speaker 1>kannebl are out. They could use Carpet Purtins in that

0:11:36.520 --> 0:11:39.760
<v Speaker 1>bullpen really badly. So that even to me points a

0:11:39.800 --> 0:11:42.520
<v Speaker 1>little more that they have faith that Craig Kimberle is

0:11:42.920 --> 0:11:46.120
<v Speaker 1>going to be signing with the Brewers and meaning that

0:11:46.160 --> 0:11:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Hater is going to be that fireman guy again. It's

0:11:48.600 --> 0:11:50.280
<v Speaker 1>not gonna be just like last year because they don't

0:11:50.280 --> 0:11:52.800
<v Speaker 1>have as many options as well, So they can't just

0:11:52.920 --> 0:11:54.719
<v Speaker 1>instantly just go cool, We'll go Hater and everything else

0:11:54.720 --> 0:11:55.840
<v Speaker 1>will be fine. They have to be a little bit

0:11:55.880 --> 0:11:58.920
<v Speaker 1>more selective. But I still I still expect Hater not

0:11:59.000 --> 0:12:00.600
<v Speaker 1>to be the de fact that closed or in Milwaukee

0:12:00.640 --> 0:12:02.880
<v Speaker 1>and to be more of that fireman for the entire season.

0:12:03.160 --> 0:12:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Let's get into the rotation with Milwaukee a little bit

0:12:05.920 --> 0:12:09.680
<v Speaker 1>here where Corvin Burns in the rotation, Brandon Woodruff in

0:12:09.679 --> 0:12:12.240
<v Speaker 1>the rotation. I've been kind of on random Woodrofe until

0:12:12.280 --> 0:12:14.600
<v Speaker 1>he got kind of she lacked in his last start. Um,

0:12:14.640 --> 0:12:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Brandon Woodrifs the one that interests me the most. What

0:12:17.400 --> 0:12:21.120
<v Speaker 1>do you know about him? And is their fantasy relevance here? Sure,

0:12:21.559 --> 0:12:23.440
<v Speaker 1>he's definitely someone I would take a flyer on in

0:12:23.480 --> 0:12:25.640
<v Speaker 1>a twelve team or why not? I would say, if

0:12:25.640 --> 0:12:28.120
<v Speaker 1>I had to give a comp to Woodruffe, it's not

0:12:28.160 --> 0:12:30.559
<v Speaker 1>a good one. You're not gonna hear good comps from

0:12:30.559 --> 0:12:34.199
<v Speaker 1>me today. Brandon Woodriff compares to Vents of Alaska's for

0:12:34.280 --> 0:12:37.240
<v Speaker 1>me because it's a lot of fastballs and that's how

0:12:37.240 --> 0:12:39.640
<v Speaker 1>he gets the strikeouts. But the secondary stuff is lacking.

0:12:39.640 --> 0:12:41.520
<v Speaker 1>There isn't a big wid pitch there. It's just really

0:12:41.559 --> 0:12:44.559
<v Speaker 1>too and they don't really impress me. How Woodroffe is

0:12:44.559 --> 0:12:46.560
<v Speaker 1>going to succeed is with good fastball command on a

0:12:46.559 --> 0:12:49.120
<v Speaker 1>given day. I don't actually believe that Woodriff has the

0:12:49.160 --> 0:12:52.280
<v Speaker 1>best basketball command, and that makes me inherently a little

0:12:52.400 --> 0:12:56.080
<v Speaker 1>skeptical of a long season uh of success for Woodroff.

0:12:56.080 --> 0:12:57.200
<v Speaker 1>I think it's gonna be a bit of what I

0:12:57.200 --> 0:12:59.120
<v Speaker 1>call it cherry bomb, where they can be super sweet

0:12:59.360 --> 0:13:01.720
<v Speaker 1>or blow up in your face a lot like his

0:13:01.800 --> 0:13:06.440
<v Speaker 1>teammate Freddy Peralta. So actually, out of those rotation guys,

0:13:06.480 --> 0:13:08.480
<v Speaker 1>would your facing the one I'm targeting, I think Corborn

0:13:08.559 --> 0:13:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Burns has the best chance of turning into a starter

0:13:11.559 --> 0:13:13.679
<v Speaker 1>you can trust for the entirety of the year if

0:13:13.720 --> 0:13:17.000
<v Speaker 1>the Brewers actually are sold on him staying in the rotation,

0:13:17.400 --> 0:13:18.800
<v Speaker 1>if they don't go after Kimber, I want to be

0:13:18.840 --> 0:13:21.600
<v Speaker 1>surprised if Burns is the one that falls out to

0:13:21.679 --> 0:13:27.560
<v Speaker 1>be a reliever once Nelson returns. Let me, actually, before

0:13:27.600 --> 0:13:30.040
<v Speaker 1>I kind of bounce off of what you said about

0:13:30.080 --> 0:13:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Corby Burren, you mentioned Jimmy Nelson. I need to kind

0:13:32.160 --> 0:13:34.360
<v Speaker 1>of jump on that. Freaking I got a bit of

0:13:34.360 --> 0:13:38.040
<v Speaker 1>a heated debate yesterday and it was in regards to

0:13:38.200 --> 0:13:40.120
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Nelson, and it kind of led to Jimmy Nelson

0:13:40.200 --> 0:13:43.559
<v Speaker 1>versus Drew palmeran's conversation and listen, I'd try to Jimmy

0:13:43.600 --> 0:13:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Nelson that rookie year. I was really excited about him

0:13:45.559 --> 0:13:49.600
<v Speaker 1>back in I guess, yeah, obviously he was much better

0:13:49.640 --> 0:13:53.080
<v Speaker 1>in seventeen. Missed all of last year eighteen, not starting

0:13:53.080 --> 0:13:56.040
<v Speaker 1>this season in the rotation. He's building up our strength

0:13:56.080 --> 0:14:00.000
<v Speaker 1>and whatnot in twenty nineteen. I'm trying to temp from

0:14:00.080 --> 0:14:03.280
<v Speaker 1>expectations were Gimmy, yes, you wanted a flyer on him,

0:14:03.400 --> 0:14:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely no issue. But this is a guy we have

0:14:06.320 --> 0:14:09.120
<v Speaker 1>that seen pitch consistently. Of course, in a year and

0:14:09.120 --> 0:14:11.920
<v Speaker 1>a half, it gets a lot to ask for to

0:14:12.160 --> 0:14:14.120
<v Speaker 1>assume he's just gonna be Jimmy Nelson again. The same

0:14:14.120 --> 0:14:17.000
<v Speaker 1>with Jimmy Nelson. We saw Frank is a little bit

0:14:17.000 --> 0:14:20.880
<v Speaker 1>more optimistic when it comes to Nelson. What say you, Yeah,

0:14:20.960 --> 0:14:22.760
<v Speaker 1>it's I keep going back and forth a bit. I

0:14:22.800 --> 0:14:24.360
<v Speaker 1>think early in the off season and we were all

0:14:24.400 --> 0:14:27.040
<v Speaker 1>really excited about it because he missed the entirety of

0:14:27.040 --> 0:14:30.360
<v Speaker 1>two eighteen and we thought he'd be pitching then alright, fine,

0:14:30.400 --> 0:14:32.320
<v Speaker 1>then take off the entire season. You should be all

0:14:32.360 --> 0:14:34.920
<v Speaker 1>ready to go and back to normal by the time

0:14:34.960 --> 0:14:37.240
<v Speaker 1>spring training hits and the verular season. And that's not

0:14:37.280 --> 0:14:40.200
<v Speaker 1>really what we've seen. Uh. It sounds like he'll need

0:14:40.280 --> 0:14:42.480
<v Speaker 1>till the middle of April, maybe a little bit later

0:14:42.520 --> 0:14:45.240
<v Speaker 1>than that, to return into the rotation. He just pitched yesterday,

0:14:45.240 --> 0:14:48.480
<v Speaker 1>I believe was four innings abound, fifty seven pitches. My

0:14:48.560 --> 0:14:52.360
<v Speaker 1>memory serves me right where he was touching well, he

0:14:52.440 --> 0:14:55.160
<v Speaker 1>was sitting ninety four last year with that sinker. That

0:14:55.240 --> 0:14:57.480
<v Speaker 1>does give me a little bit hesitation. He's obviously still

0:14:57.560 --> 0:14:59.360
<v Speaker 1>ramping up a little bit, so that could get better.

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:02.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm a little hesitant. I mean, the guy killed it

0:15:02.800 --> 0:15:06.640
<v Speaker 1>with his curveball, had that consistent sinker that was cruising

0:15:06.640 --> 0:15:08.240
<v Speaker 1>for him. I mean, this was a very very bad

0:15:08.280 --> 0:15:10.800
<v Speaker 1>pitch for him in two thousand sixteen, turned it around,

0:15:10.800 --> 0:15:12.880
<v Speaker 1>was a very positive one for in two thousand seventeen.

0:15:13.440 --> 0:15:16.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm hesitant to invest in him. The one benefit you

0:15:16.680 --> 0:15:18.600
<v Speaker 1>do get getting Nelson is that he will be on

0:15:18.640 --> 0:15:21.280
<v Speaker 1>the i L entering the year, and there are very

0:15:21.320 --> 0:15:24.480
<v Speaker 1>few good i L spots early in the season. I

0:15:24.480 --> 0:15:27.080
<v Speaker 1>would say Andrew Heaney is a decent one that you

0:15:27.120 --> 0:15:28.760
<v Speaker 1>can just stash in that because he'll be back in

0:15:28.960 --> 0:15:31.480
<v Speaker 1>two three weeks. That's easy saying with Nelson, I don't

0:15:31.480 --> 0:15:32.840
<v Speaker 1>want to go for the guys that are going to

0:15:32.920 --> 0:15:35.560
<v Speaker 1>be out until the middle of July or something like that,

0:15:35.680 --> 0:15:37.520
<v Speaker 1>like Dinelson Lamett. I think that's just a kind of

0:15:37.520 --> 0:15:39.160
<v Speaker 1>a waste because you will have to go through those

0:15:39.200 --> 0:15:41.760
<v Speaker 1>aisle spots during the year. So I like Nelson in

0:15:41.800 --> 0:15:45.640
<v Speaker 1>that respect. I don't expect two seventeen again. At the

0:15:45.680 --> 0:15:47.440
<v Speaker 1>same time, I can see a three seven ear ay

0:15:47.560 --> 0:15:51.000
<v Speaker 1>with a twenty three K rates. Maybe it would obviously

0:15:51.120 --> 0:15:53.600
<v Speaker 1>upside for more, but I think he can help you

0:15:53.720 --> 0:15:56.080
<v Speaker 1>when he is pitching. It's just not the massive impact

0:15:56.080 --> 0:15:58.920
<v Speaker 1>that we thought we'd be getting this late in drafts.

0:15:59.000 --> 0:16:01.240
<v Speaker 1>That also becoming one of those d L guys as well.

0:16:01.320 --> 0:16:02.720
<v Speaker 1>So whatever he can use there that he could be

0:16:02.720 --> 0:16:06.960
<v Speaker 1>at sixt eight weeks. That's what I heard. Yeah, and

0:16:07.040 --> 0:16:09.280
<v Speaker 1>I did. I didn't think I made that up, did I.

0:16:09.280 --> 0:16:11.480
<v Speaker 1>I haven't seen anything yet. I was looking into it

0:16:11.600 --> 0:16:14.440
<v Speaker 1>last night. The last thing that I saw was they

0:16:14.480 --> 0:16:17.280
<v Speaker 1>weren't gonna be able to figure it out until they

0:16:17.280 --> 0:16:20.240
<v Speaker 1>get back from Tokyo. Maybe making Maybe I'm making that up,

0:16:20.240 --> 0:16:22.480
<v Speaker 1>but I didn't see I didn't see an official timetable

0:16:22.520 --> 0:16:25.280
<v Speaker 1>we get from mad Olson. That would be terrible because

0:16:25.280 --> 0:16:28.320
<v Speaker 1>I have him everywhere. It was very excited about him. Uh.

0:16:28.360 --> 0:16:30.880
<v Speaker 1>If I were ranking the brewers starting pitchers here, I

0:16:30.920 --> 0:16:34.240
<v Speaker 1>would just I would go to me, it's Jimmy Nelson,

0:16:34.680 --> 0:16:38.960
<v Speaker 1>would druff. I think it's close between Burns and Freddy Peralta.

0:16:39.040 --> 0:16:41.480
<v Speaker 1>But I do think like once Jimmy Nelson comes back

0:16:41.520 --> 0:16:45.280
<v Speaker 1>into the rotation, someone's probably gonna get booted here, right Nick,

0:16:45.320 --> 0:16:47.840
<v Speaker 1>Because as of right now, they have Zach Davies in there,

0:16:47.840 --> 0:16:51.320
<v Speaker 1>they have Corbin Burns, they have Freddy Peralta. Freddie Peralta, Um,

0:16:51.360 --> 0:16:53.200
<v Speaker 1>you know made some noise last year, remember that starting

0:16:53.280 --> 0:16:55.400
<v Speaker 1>in Colorado where he just kind of wowed everyone. But

0:16:55.440 --> 0:16:58.440
<v Speaker 1>he throws his fastball like seventy eight percent at a time,

0:16:58.480 --> 0:17:01.600
<v Speaker 1>so kind of reads me a little bit there. Who

0:17:01.640 --> 0:17:03.840
<v Speaker 1>do you think it's the boom real quick? If when

0:17:03.920 --> 0:17:07.359
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Nilson, Jimmy Nelson comes back, if I had to guess,

0:17:07.400 --> 0:17:09.960
<v Speaker 1>it probably would be Peralta. Concerning he is someone that

0:17:10.040 --> 0:17:12.000
<v Speaker 1>is really good or really bad, it could be Zach Davies, though,

0:17:12.040 --> 0:17:14.560
<v Speaker 1>don't forget that he can be pretty meodoca on his own.

0:17:15.160 --> 0:17:17.119
<v Speaker 1>When we come back, Nigga, answer the question of who

0:17:17.160 --> 0:17:19.919
<v Speaker 1>do you want right now, Drew Palmerans or Jimmy Nelson,

0:17:20.119 --> 0:17:22.480
<v Speaker 1>and well go often to these other pets that we're

0:17:22.480 --> 0:17:24.680
<v Speaker 1>here a little bit about that's guaranteed themselves. Rotations, the

0:17:24.720 --> 0:17:27.560
<v Speaker 1>spots stick around more on the way right after this.

0:17:29.200 --> 0:17:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Daily rodo dot Com learned from the game's best DFS players.

0:17:34.000 --> 0:17:38.080
<v Speaker 1>We don't just give you advice. We play every day,

0:17:38.560 --> 0:17:42.880
<v Speaker 1>all major sports, all year round. We never stopped industry

0:17:42.960 --> 0:17:46.800
<v Speaker 1>leading DFS tools and custom projections, and now the Daily

0:17:46.880 --> 0:17:50.720
<v Speaker 1>rodo dot Com Optimizer in minutes build an optimized line

0:17:50.800 --> 0:17:53.840
<v Speaker 1>up for cash games and tourneys. Learned from the game's

0:17:53.880 --> 0:17:59.240
<v Speaker 1>best DBS players joined Daily roado dot com. The following

0:17:59.280 --> 0:18:04.520
<v Speaker 1>ad contain shocking material. Listener discretion is advised. Is someone

0:18:04.560 --> 0:18:07.680
<v Speaker 1>in your family playing a dangerous game of Russian Roulette?

0:18:07.840 --> 0:18:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Over forty three thousand people die a year from drug overdose.

0:18:11.760 --> 0:18:15.560
<v Speaker 1>A hundred and twenty people a day, five people every hour,

0:18:15.920 --> 0:18:21.280
<v Speaker 1>one person every twelve minutes. Eight thousand people die every

0:18:21.320 --> 0:18:24.840
<v Speaker 1>year from alcohol abuse. Over two hundred and forty people

0:18:24.880 --> 0:18:28.719
<v Speaker 1>a day, ten an hour, one person every six minutes,

0:18:29.240 --> 0:18:32.760
<v Speaker 1>somebody you know. Maybe next learn how to help someone

0:18:32.880 --> 0:18:37.160
<v Speaker 1>you love get away from the drugs, alcohol and bad influences.

0:18:37.359 --> 0:18:39.480
<v Speaker 1>With the f m l A, people can take a

0:18:39.560 --> 0:18:42.199
<v Speaker 1>leave of absence from their job and still keep it.

0:18:42.480 --> 0:18:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Call now and learn how we can help you. Eight

0:18:45.960 --> 0:18:50.359
<v Speaker 1>six six four eight four nine six two one eight

0:18:50.480 --> 0:18:54.440
<v Speaker 1>six six four eight four nine six two one. That's

0:18:54.480 --> 0:18:59.160
<v Speaker 1>eight six six four eight four ninety six one. There

0:18:59.280 --> 0:19:03.800
<v Speaker 1>is Area's calling the shots. Eli Manning was in the

0:19:03.880 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 1>bottom third of the NFL even when he was not

0:19:07.160 --> 0:19:10.399
<v Speaker 1>crushured inefficiency rating. He couldn't throw the ball down the

0:19:10.440 --> 0:19:13.199
<v Speaker 1>field anymore. We could go on and on and on

0:19:13.240 --> 0:19:16.080
<v Speaker 1>about Eli Manning. And I like Eli Manning, I truly do.

0:19:16.640 --> 0:19:20.359
<v Speaker 1>But Eli Manning is no longer elite if he ever was,

0:19:20.400 --> 0:19:22.960
<v Speaker 1>to be truthful, But Eli Manning, it's just not that dude.

0:19:23.000 --> 0:19:25.439
<v Speaker 1>Week days a pm to eleven pm Eastern on the

0:19:25.440 --> 0:19:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Sports networking on your popular podcast providers about piation,

0:19:38.400 --> 0:19:53.119
<v Speaker 1>Well Well Well Phil, back with you, Fantasy best Friends Forever.

0:19:53.240 --> 0:19:57.960
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Sports Radio Network, Greg Sausman, Frank stamfle Nick Pollock

0:19:58.040 --> 0:20:01.560
<v Speaker 1>with you here on a Friday last Friday before the

0:20:01.600 --> 0:20:04.960
<v Speaker 1>final weekend, Oh, Fantasy Baseball and drafts. A whole lot

0:20:05.040 --> 0:20:09.040
<v Speaker 1>going on with you right now. So Nick, before we

0:20:09.080 --> 0:20:11.440
<v Speaker 1>continue on to ask the question right this second, who

0:20:11.440 --> 0:20:14.159
<v Speaker 1>would you rather have Jew Palmer Ends or Jimmy Nelson.

0:20:14.359 --> 0:20:18.240
<v Speaker 1>What's your answer, Jimmy Nelson Jr. Palmer Rands, especially for

0:20:18.240 --> 0:20:21.120
<v Speaker 1>a twelve teamer, I feel is he needs to show

0:20:21.160 --> 0:20:24.320
<v Speaker 1>me a lot more secondary pitch. And how about you're

0:20:24.320 --> 0:20:27.159
<v Speaker 1>showing you that he's healthy rather than the one that's well. Now,

0:20:27.200 --> 0:20:29.480
<v Speaker 1>I think he's healthy. I think he's healthy. Last year

0:20:29.480 --> 0:20:31.439
<v Speaker 1>he was averaging about the eighty nine and change on

0:20:31.480 --> 0:20:34.760
<v Speaker 1>his fastbay has already been in spring training. That's essentially

0:20:34.800 --> 0:20:37.320
<v Speaker 1>where he has been for the other years of his career.

0:20:37.480 --> 0:20:40.000
<v Speaker 1>So I think he's healthy again. He he got past

0:20:40.000 --> 0:20:41.960
<v Speaker 1>that dead arm thing, but yeah, it could you know,

0:20:42.000 --> 0:20:43.920
<v Speaker 1>it could show up again. He could hit the d

0:20:44.119 --> 0:20:47.440
<v Speaker 1>L later on as his elbow bothers him again. But honestly,

0:20:47.440 --> 0:20:48.880
<v Speaker 1>for the price that you're playing with Drew palmer Rands,

0:20:48.920 --> 0:20:50.600
<v Speaker 1>that's fine as long as you get some production right

0:20:50.600 --> 0:20:53.639
<v Speaker 1>now from him. Well, Jimmy Nelson has the upside and

0:20:53.720 --> 0:20:56.240
<v Speaker 1>actually being a good starter through the year I think

0:20:56.240 --> 0:20:58.480
<v Speaker 1>we expect more production out of the adit from him.

0:20:58.840 --> 0:21:02.359
<v Speaker 1>Jaw Palmer, you're chasing that three three ear ray or

0:21:02.440 --> 0:21:06.000
<v Speaker 1>so that he used to have. But I always came

0:21:06.040 --> 0:21:07.520
<v Speaker 1>with a ton of regression. It was always a really

0:21:07.560 --> 0:21:10.480
<v Speaker 1>short ips as things. We started about five and five

0:21:10.480 --> 0:21:12.040
<v Speaker 1>point five, which is really low. You want to get

0:21:12.119 --> 0:21:15.119
<v Speaker 1>close to six for that. So I don't really see

0:21:15.160 --> 0:21:18.399
<v Speaker 1>the ceiling for for Palmerce being too high, while Nelson

0:21:18.440 --> 0:21:21.880
<v Speaker 1>obviously has a super high ceiling. Wow, which is who

0:21:21.880 --> 0:21:24.360
<v Speaker 1>would have thought Greg? Exactly what I said yesterday. I mean,

0:21:24.359 --> 0:21:26.440
<v Speaker 1>this is why I brought up I knew, I knew

0:21:26.480 --> 0:21:29.119
<v Speaker 1>he helped me out with Jimmy Nelson versu Drew Palmers.

0:21:29.119 --> 0:21:33.320
<v Speaker 1>But my main point was the upside. It's just I

0:21:33.359 --> 0:21:35.640
<v Speaker 1>know he hasn't pitched since seen but what he did

0:21:35.680 --> 0:21:37.919
<v Speaker 1>that year, I mean in terms of the swings and

0:21:37.920 --> 0:21:40.840
<v Speaker 1>missus that he got, the strikeouts, he improved across the board,

0:21:41.160 --> 0:21:43.680
<v Speaker 1>kept the walks down. That's really the biggest issue for

0:21:43.760 --> 0:21:45.879
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Nelson in the past, I think has been the walks.

0:21:45.880 --> 0:21:48.040
<v Speaker 1>So he limited the walks two years ago. He got

0:21:48.040 --> 0:21:53.160
<v Speaker 1>groundballs in a fifty percent clip. Everything was great. En Look,

0:21:53.200 --> 0:21:55.280
<v Speaker 1>we'll see what, you know, how close he can come

0:21:55.440 --> 0:21:57.320
<v Speaker 1>to getting back to that form. I think it might

0:21:57.320 --> 0:22:00.840
<v Speaker 1>take a little bit of time, but I'm obciously optimistic

0:22:00.880 --> 0:22:02.520
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to Jimmy Nelson. I think he has

0:22:02.560 --> 0:22:04.879
<v Speaker 1>the tools. He's just you know, he's still gotta get

0:22:04.880 --> 0:22:07.080
<v Speaker 1>stretched out a little bit and extended spring training here.

0:22:07.119 --> 0:22:08.639
<v Speaker 1>I think we see him in the middle of April.

0:22:08.960 --> 0:22:12.080
<v Speaker 1>And if I had to choose who gets booted from

0:22:12.080 --> 0:22:15.240
<v Speaker 1>THEA like, I don't think Zach Davies, so it wouldn't

0:22:15.240 --> 0:22:18.320
<v Speaker 1>surprise me if he's gone, But you know, he can

0:22:18.359 --> 0:22:20.520
<v Speaker 1>actually give them more innings or at least that's what

0:22:20.600 --> 0:22:22.640
<v Speaker 1>I would expect than a guy like Freddy Peralta. So yeah,

0:22:22.760 --> 0:22:26.600
<v Speaker 1>probably between those two Freddie Peralta and uh and Zach Davies,

0:22:26.680 --> 0:22:30.520
<v Speaker 1>I think one gets booted. Once Jimmy knows Urban Burns

0:22:30.560 --> 0:22:32.320
<v Speaker 1>was it was a big time prospect for them though,

0:22:32.359 --> 0:22:38.760
<v Speaker 1>Greg and yes, definitely has a cool name like Baron

0:22:38.840 --> 0:22:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Corbyn is a wrestler obviously in w W E very

0:22:41.680 --> 0:22:45.280
<v Speaker 1>similar names here orban Burns back, so I could have

0:22:45.400 --> 0:22:48.960
<v Speaker 1>could have cool name theory here. Last year he regressed

0:22:49.000 --> 0:22:51.159
<v Speaker 1>in the minor leagues. Corbon Burns that is. But in

0:22:51.280 --> 0:22:53.720
<v Speaker 1>years past, I mean right around strikeout, Ranning gets a

0:22:53.720 --> 0:22:57.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of groundballs. The numbers were spectacular in the miners.

0:22:57.119 --> 0:23:00.639
<v Speaker 1>So I do have some interest in Corbin Burns. But again,

0:23:00.960 --> 0:23:03.199
<v Speaker 1>kind of piggybacking off what Nick said, it wouldn't surprise

0:23:03.240 --> 0:23:06.840
<v Speaker 1>me if he bounces between rotation in the bullpen. It

0:23:06.840 --> 0:23:09.640
<v Speaker 1>seems like there's just so many of those those pictures

0:23:09.640 --> 0:23:12.560
<v Speaker 1>this year, Greg, Between you know, Alex Reyes and Huio

0:23:12.640 --> 0:23:14.240
<v Speaker 1>You're ryo Is, I think there's a lot of pictures

0:23:14.240 --> 0:23:16.600
<v Speaker 1>that are going to bounce back and forth between bullpens

0:23:16.600 --> 0:23:18.880
<v Speaker 1>and starting rotation, if not the minor leagues as well

0:23:18.920 --> 0:23:21.400
<v Speaker 1>as a starting rotation as well as some of these guys. Nick,

0:23:21.480 --> 0:23:23.560
<v Speaker 1>do you subscribe to my cool name of theory that

0:23:23.560 --> 0:23:26.720
<v Speaker 1>players in particularly prospects get hype because they have cool names.

0:23:27.240 --> 0:23:29.080
<v Speaker 1>Oh that's Graham. Never heard that before. But I think

0:23:29.080 --> 0:23:32.480
<v Speaker 1>that's awesome. I'm all, I'm all for silly theories like that.

0:23:32.760 --> 0:23:34.359
<v Speaker 1>Um that, you know, maybe it does work because they

0:23:34.400 --> 0:23:36.360
<v Speaker 1>have a baseball name and that's a baseball family. Then.

0:23:36.920 --> 0:23:42.040
<v Speaker 1>But but but the the idea of Cortan Burns having

0:23:42.080 --> 0:23:44.359
<v Speaker 1>a lot of success, Actually I can buy into the

0:23:44.680 --> 0:23:47.480
<v Speaker 1>fiftcent overall swings strike ery as a reliever last year,

0:23:47.480 --> 0:23:51.000
<v Speaker 1>which is great. That's really high. Just to give a

0:23:51.040 --> 0:23:53.480
<v Speaker 1>reference point, that's what you see in sures are in

0:23:53.600 --> 0:23:55.800
<v Speaker 1>sale as starters. It's harder to have a higher one

0:23:55.800 --> 0:23:58.159
<v Speaker 1>obviously as a starter than reliever. But that falls to

0:23:58.280 --> 0:24:01.520
<v Speaker 1>twelve percent. That's still well about average, and that's rooted

0:24:01.600 --> 0:24:04.320
<v Speaker 1>in a slider that is absolutely filthy. I have a

0:24:04.400 --> 0:24:08.080
<v Speaker 1>thing called the money Pitches where you have oh swing

0:24:09.119 --> 0:24:13.280
<v Speaker 1>zone zone rates and plus swing strike right on the pitch. Essentially,

0:24:13.400 --> 0:24:15.800
<v Speaker 1>he's getting strikes off the plates, he's skating strikes on

0:24:15.840 --> 0:24:18.679
<v Speaker 1>the plate, and he's getting guys missing a lot. Corbin

0:24:18.720 --> 0:24:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Burns is way past all of that. I was swing

0:24:23.240 --> 0:24:25.840
<v Speaker 1>zone right twenty five percent swing strike right on that slider.

0:24:25.840 --> 0:24:28.399
<v Speaker 1>They threw about two hundred times last year. That's awesome

0:24:28.440 --> 0:24:30.280
<v Speaker 1>to have that in his back pocket. While I was

0:24:30.280 --> 0:24:34.040
<v Speaker 1>pumping with his his fastball, I really think that this

0:24:34.119 --> 0:24:36.440
<v Speaker 1>is the kind of guy that can take that leap

0:24:36.880 --> 0:24:39.240
<v Speaker 1>and be a consistent arm for you. This is what

0:24:39.240 --> 0:24:41.720
<v Speaker 1>we've seen from a lot of guys, and he can

0:24:41.760 --> 0:24:43.879
<v Speaker 1>also go to the innings too. He threw over a

0:24:43.960 --> 0:24:46.000
<v Speaker 1>hundred and I think it was like a hundred ten

0:24:46.080 --> 0:24:49.720
<v Speaker 1>last year, but that includes being a reliever, which is

0:24:49.880 --> 0:24:52.560
<v Speaker 1>more strenuous innings than as a starter. So I think

0:24:52.560 --> 0:24:54.440
<v Speaker 1>he can really get pushed in the hundred fifty innings

0:24:54.440 --> 0:24:57.040
<v Speaker 1>at the starter this year. I'm in. I really think

0:24:57.080 --> 0:24:59.320
<v Speaker 1>if you're gonna go for upside, especially in a twelve teamer,

0:24:59.359 --> 0:25:00.840
<v Speaker 1>you want to go after Carbon Burns, go with the

0:25:00.840 --> 0:25:02.280
<v Speaker 1>guy with the best pitch, the one that has the

0:25:02.280 --> 0:25:06.359
<v Speaker 1>most overwhelming swing strike right, because that's what constitute aces often,

0:25:06.760 --> 0:25:09.080
<v Speaker 1>swing strike rates is what you want to go after.

0:25:10.240 --> 0:25:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Go with Burns, Burns over wood Druff too, Nick, Yes, yes, Woodruff,

0:25:15.240 --> 0:25:18.920
<v Speaker 1>Okay there you sure, sure, sure, sure, all right? Um

0:25:19.400 --> 0:25:21.880
<v Speaker 1>continuing almost some of the big time news, Paul gold

0:25:21.920 --> 0:25:24.720
<v Speaker 1>Schmitt size its extension with the Cardinals is gonna stay

0:25:24.760 --> 0:25:26.600
<v Speaker 1>there for the next five years. One thirty four. I

0:25:26.600 --> 0:25:28.840
<v Speaker 1>think I saw it was the number. Um so gold

0:25:28.880 --> 0:25:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Schmidt and we kind of predicted this would happened. St.

0:25:31.119 --> 0:25:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Louis locks these guys up traditionally, and they were able

0:25:33.600 --> 0:25:36.080
<v Speaker 1>to do that now with a Paul gold Schmidt. So

0:25:36.160 --> 0:25:38.720
<v Speaker 1>good stuff for the Cardinals, and it was important because

0:25:38.720 --> 0:25:41.160
<v Speaker 1>they traded a lot away to get him. Luke Weaver

0:25:41.240 --> 0:25:44.640
<v Speaker 1>comes to mind Carson Kelly as well, former top prospects

0:25:44.640 --> 0:25:46.639
<v Speaker 1>for the Cardinals in order to get Paul gold Schmidt

0:25:47.000 --> 0:25:51.560
<v Speaker 1>uh in St. Louis and ultimately locked up. Now I

0:25:51.640 --> 0:25:53.640
<v Speaker 1>bring up Luke Weaver because he's one of these guys

0:25:53.640 --> 0:25:56.320
<v Speaker 1>that's going late in draft. So that that I'm just wondering, Nick,

0:25:56.520 --> 0:25:58.359
<v Speaker 1>are you enter out on a guy like Luke Weaver.

0:25:59.560 --> 0:26:01.919
<v Speaker 1>Weaver is an intrigue in one. Again, I always have

0:26:01.960 --> 0:26:04.840
<v Speaker 1>the reference point for twelve teamers. I don't think that

0:26:04.880 --> 0:26:06.719
<v Speaker 1>he's someone that you need to go after in your

0:26:06.800 --> 0:26:09.160
<v Speaker 1>draft necessarily. I think there are a lot of intriguing

0:26:09.200 --> 0:26:11.280
<v Speaker 1>guys later on that I think of a higher ceiling

0:26:11.320 --> 0:26:14.159
<v Speaker 1>than Luke Weaver. But here's someone that's looking for quality starts.

0:26:14.280 --> 0:26:16.240
<v Speaker 1>He actually might be a really sneaky ad for that

0:26:16.320 --> 0:26:18.600
<v Speaker 1>concern that the Diamondbacks are gonna let their starters go.

0:26:19.040 --> 0:26:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Same with his buddy Meryl Kelly over there. They're gonna

0:26:21.880 --> 0:26:25.200
<v Speaker 1>go six innings often because that bullpen isn't great. They

0:26:25.240 --> 0:26:27.479
<v Speaker 1>just neither started to go deep. It's not like they

0:26:27.520 --> 0:26:30.480
<v Speaker 1>need to micromanage every single game in Arizona? Are we sure?

0:26:30.840 --> 0:26:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Are we sure of that? Because it's always been talking

0:26:32.440 --> 0:26:34.439
<v Speaker 1>too Archie Bradley. We talked to Brad Ziegler about this

0:26:34.680 --> 0:26:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Archie Bradley being and that Josh Hater role, letting Greg

0:26:37.280 --> 0:26:40.119
<v Speaker 1>Holland or Harno close it out and have Archie Bradley

0:26:40.119 --> 0:26:43.719
<v Speaker 1>and probably somebody else in that bullpen pitch multiple innings, uh,

0:26:43.800 --> 0:26:46.640
<v Speaker 1>potentially earlier in games that they don't want to use

0:26:46.680 --> 0:26:48.480
<v Speaker 1>their starters even a game. So I don't know if

0:26:48.480 --> 0:26:56.320
<v Speaker 1>that's true. Oh sorry, I thought, I'm just I don't know.

0:26:57.280 --> 0:27:01.760
<v Speaker 1>I thought I was ready for freak. No, I'm honestly, honestly,

0:27:01.760 --> 0:27:03.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that that that's gonna be the case

0:27:03.720 --> 0:27:05.919
<v Speaker 1>with Luke Weaver. Luke Weaver has the ability to go

0:27:06.000 --> 0:27:09.520
<v Speaker 1>deeper into games without walking a ton of batters. So

0:27:09.520 --> 0:27:11.400
<v Speaker 1>so essentially that means the sixth thing arrives and he's

0:27:11.400 --> 0:27:14.440
<v Speaker 1>not at ninety five pitches or so, he's gonna most

0:27:14.480 --> 0:27:17.840
<v Speaker 1>likely be around. And yeah, that's that's totally fair that

0:27:17.920 --> 0:27:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Archie Bradley could be that fireman roll. I I don't

0:27:20.640 --> 0:27:23.280
<v Speaker 1>anticipate them being this super micro manager of being. I

0:27:23.280 --> 0:27:25.160
<v Speaker 1>mean generally, when you when you have a guy going

0:27:25.240 --> 0:27:26.879
<v Speaker 1>like five point five a lot, that means that they

0:27:26.880 --> 0:27:29.200
<v Speaker 1>have like three leavers that they're going to be going

0:27:29.200 --> 0:27:30.760
<v Speaker 1>to cool. You have Archie Bradley for this one and

0:27:30.840 --> 0:27:32.119
<v Speaker 1>that one, and then you have a guy after that

0:27:32.160 --> 0:27:33.640
<v Speaker 1>and then this and that's how you finish your game.

0:27:34.040 --> 0:27:36.119
<v Speaker 1>I really do see Luke Weaver having an above average

0:27:36.119 --> 0:27:39.280
<v Speaker 1>amount of quality starts in Arizona because of this. He's

0:27:39.320 --> 0:27:41.360
<v Speaker 1>also not one of those guys that I see as

0:27:41.600 --> 0:27:43.680
<v Speaker 1>what I said before as a cherry bomb, which means

0:27:43.720 --> 0:27:45.240
<v Speaker 1>he's not gonna have a ton of blow ups, but

0:27:45.280 --> 0:27:47.160
<v Speaker 1>don't really also see him having a lot of zero

0:27:47.200 --> 0:27:48.440
<v Speaker 1>and one on a run of games. He's gonna be

0:27:48.440 --> 0:27:51.439
<v Speaker 1>having around the two, three, four a lot. Uh. It

0:27:51.520 --> 0:27:53.760
<v Speaker 1>really does come down to that third pitch of cutters

0:27:53.800 --> 0:27:56.639
<v Speaker 1>and change ups, which starting I change ups, curveballs. What

0:27:56.800 --> 0:27:58.520
<v Speaker 1>is going to be the pitch that takes over Because

0:27:58.800 --> 0:28:01.880
<v Speaker 1>the fastball changeup domination is good for Weaver, he really

0:28:01.880 --> 0:28:04.040
<v Speaker 1>needs to get back to that being his foundation, but

0:28:04.080 --> 0:28:05.920
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't have a third pitch to get strikes when

0:28:05.960 --> 0:28:08.400
<v Speaker 1>one of those two aren't working. From that's really gonna

0:28:08.400 --> 0:28:10.000
<v Speaker 1>be looking forward with Weaver. I don't think there's a

0:28:10.000 --> 0:28:12.800
<v Speaker 1>ton of upside, but I think he's a solid Flora guy.

0:28:12.840 --> 0:28:15.000
<v Speaker 1>To go after in deeper leagues. That's what you said, Frank, right,

0:28:15.000 --> 0:28:17.480
<v Speaker 1>that he just needs to find that third pitch again

0:28:17.520 --> 0:28:19.800
<v Speaker 1>because the first two really good. It's the third one

0:28:19.840 --> 0:28:21.960
<v Speaker 1>that is kind of holding him back. And then you're

0:28:22.000 --> 0:28:23.919
<v Speaker 1>right on that's a good job. Yeah. That's why I

0:28:23.960 --> 0:28:25.959
<v Speaker 1>wasn't really invested in Luke Weaver last year, a guy

0:28:25.960 --> 0:28:28.240
<v Speaker 1>who was being drafted as a top thirty thirty five

0:28:28.240 --> 0:28:33.359
<v Speaker 1>starting pitcher in seen because I looked at well last year, Ineen,

0:28:33.359 --> 0:28:35.480
<v Speaker 1>I looked at his seventeen when he kind of broke out,

0:28:35.600 --> 0:28:37.879
<v Speaker 1>and you know, he used the fastball he used to

0:28:37.920 --> 0:28:40.040
<v Speaker 1>change up a lot and it was red and butter

0:28:40.080 --> 0:28:42.080
<v Speaker 1>for him. But again, needs to work on that curveball.

0:28:42.440 --> 0:28:44.160
<v Speaker 1>And you know, we've read an article from the Athletic

0:28:44.160 --> 0:28:46.720
<v Speaker 1>Graig about how he you know, he purchased one of

0:28:46.760 --> 0:28:49.400
<v Speaker 1>these machines that helps him with his spin rate on

0:28:49.400 --> 0:28:52.320
<v Speaker 1>his curveball. He's you know, consciously trying to develop that pitch.

0:28:52.400 --> 0:28:54.520
<v Speaker 1>So we'll see what happens here heading into the season.

0:28:54.600 --> 0:28:56.920
<v Speaker 1>But at least he knows that he needs that third

0:28:56.960 --> 0:28:59.240
<v Speaker 1>pitch and he needs to develop it. I also thought

0:28:59.320 --> 0:29:02.120
<v Speaker 1>that the swinging strike rates that he has posted in

0:29:02.160 --> 0:29:04.560
<v Speaker 1>his career didn't really add up to the you know,

0:29:04.640 --> 0:29:08.040
<v Speaker 1>over ten case per nine that he posted, So I

0:29:08.080 --> 0:29:10.800
<v Speaker 1>was I was pretty out on his draft price last year,

0:29:11.000 --> 0:29:13.360
<v Speaker 1>but now you're getting him, you know, as one of

0:29:13.360 --> 0:29:15.840
<v Speaker 1>your last round picks. I I still do think that

0:29:15.920 --> 0:29:18.120
<v Speaker 1>he is a picture that has upside. So we'll see

0:29:18.160 --> 0:29:20.040
<v Speaker 1>how it works out. If I end up with him

0:29:20.040 --> 0:29:24.640
<v Speaker 1>as one of my bench pictures, I'm perfectly fine with that. Okay, Ye,

0:29:24.720 --> 0:29:28.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm okay with that as well. Let's continue on here,

0:29:28.200 --> 0:29:30.560
<v Speaker 1>and I want to get to where should I go

0:29:30.640 --> 0:29:32.720
<v Speaker 1>next rank? Is there any specifically you know what? Here's

0:29:32.720 --> 0:29:35.120
<v Speaker 1>what I'll do. We mentioned St. Louis with Paul Goldschman,

0:29:35.160 --> 0:29:37.880
<v Speaker 1>and that brings up one of the other cool theory guys,

0:29:38.120 --> 0:29:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Dakoda Hudson, where who he seems to have earned a

0:29:41.040 --> 0:29:45.720
<v Speaker 1>rotation spot. Dakoda Hudson has a little bit of hype

0:29:46.200 --> 0:29:48.800
<v Speaker 1>surrounding him going into the spring. Then came down to

0:29:48.880 --> 0:29:53.600
<v Speaker 1>the spring earning this job inside the rotation. Should twelve

0:29:53.680 --> 0:29:57.040
<v Speaker 1>team leaguers or mixed leaguers be drafting Dakoda Hudson. I

0:29:57.080 --> 0:29:59.760
<v Speaker 1>don't really see why. I mean, I understand that he

0:29:59.800 --> 0:30:02.080
<v Speaker 1>is a fit the rotation spot guy in a winning

0:30:02.080 --> 0:30:07.120
<v Speaker 1>ball club. Okay, but this this is something I'm shifted

0:30:07.160 --> 0:30:09.720
<v Speaker 1>on over the past four years or so. I don't

0:30:09.840 --> 0:30:13.320
<v Speaker 1>love extreme groundball guys. I think I tweeted out the

0:30:13.360 --> 0:30:16.280
<v Speaker 1>top ten groundball guys with at least a hundred innings

0:30:16.360 --> 0:30:19.520
<v Speaker 1>last year, and at the top of it was Marcus Stroman.

0:30:19.560 --> 0:30:22.920
<v Speaker 1>You saw no one in the top thirty. Inside of that,

0:30:24.000 --> 0:30:27.160
<v Speaker 1>you saw guys like Dylan Covey, you saw Dallas Kikel

0:30:27.160 --> 0:30:30.000
<v Speaker 1>who didn't really have a strong year. You saw other

0:30:30.080 --> 0:30:32.080
<v Speaker 1>names that you just don't want to be associated with.

0:30:32.240 --> 0:30:34.560
<v Speaker 1>And to see a massive sinkle baller at this point

0:30:34.600 --> 0:30:37.360
<v Speaker 1>without a high swinging strike rate in the minors. He

0:30:37.440 --> 0:30:39.960
<v Speaker 1>had a ten point five percent mark last year in

0:30:39.960 --> 0:30:42.280
<v Speaker 1>two thousand eighteen in triple A. That's a hundred eleven innings.

0:30:42.520 --> 0:30:46.160
<v Speaker 1>That was his highest since a plus ball. I don't

0:30:46.160 --> 0:30:49.200
<v Speaker 1>really see something that is going to really push the

0:30:49.240 --> 0:30:51.960
<v Speaker 1>needle for you in in twelve teamers, and there's no

0:30:52.040 --> 0:30:54.200
<v Speaker 1>reason to go after a guy that were You're just

0:30:54.200 --> 0:30:56.960
<v Speaker 1>going from maybe a three seven year ray, maybe a

0:30:57.120 --> 0:31:01.520
<v Speaker 1>one twenty whip that's what you're hoping for from Dakota Hudson.

0:31:01.560 --> 0:31:03.280
<v Speaker 1>There are so many other options that you can go

0:31:03.360 --> 0:31:07.080
<v Speaker 1>for those ratios with much higher strike edibility. I mean

0:31:07.120 --> 0:31:10.720
<v Speaker 1>he hasn't eighteen point five percent was that strikeout range

0:31:10.840 --> 0:31:12.560
<v Speaker 1>as an eight team. That's the highest against since a

0:31:12.680 --> 0:31:14.760
<v Speaker 1>plus ball of nine innings in two as in sixteen.

0:31:14.800 --> 0:31:16.640
<v Speaker 1>So this is not a strikeout guy. This is a

0:31:16.680 --> 0:31:18.920
<v Speaker 1>guy trying to get a lot of groundballs babbing and

0:31:18.960 --> 0:31:22.080
<v Speaker 1>go against him. And this can be just batter ratios

0:31:22.160 --> 0:31:24.760
<v Speaker 1>often that don't help you with strikeouts and something the salvage.

0:31:24.760 --> 0:31:26.400
<v Speaker 1>They're not my kind of guy that you should be

0:31:26.440 --> 0:31:30.600
<v Speaker 1>chasing the end of twelve teamers. We were talking about

0:31:30.640 --> 0:31:33.360
<v Speaker 1>pictures and certain guys that that are hurt and coming back,

0:31:33.400 --> 0:31:35.360
<v Speaker 1>like Jimmy Nelson and Drew Palmer as well. One guy

0:31:35.360 --> 0:31:36.840
<v Speaker 1>that always seems to be hurt is rich Hill. He

0:31:37.160 --> 0:31:39.600
<v Speaker 1>was expected to start opening day for Clayton Kershaw uh

0:31:39.680 --> 0:31:42.400
<v Speaker 1>and or for Walker Bueller and the problem is, well

0:31:43.240 --> 0:31:46.200
<v Speaker 1>he hurt too. Rich Hill not going to be starting

0:31:46.240 --> 0:31:49.840
<v Speaker 1>opening day as he has a sore left knee. Sky

0:31:50.160 --> 0:31:54.640
<v Speaker 1>blue Grass is green. I mean, your name is Greg Susan.

0:31:54.760 --> 0:31:57.120
<v Speaker 1>These are all facts. We all knew that at some

0:31:57.160 --> 0:31:58.960
<v Speaker 1>point rich Hill was going to get hurt. It wasn't

0:31:58.960 --> 0:32:01.360
<v Speaker 1>a blister, wasn't an arm, It's a sore left knee.

0:32:01.840 --> 0:32:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Or literally earlier today it was Dave Roberts said. Roberts said, Hey,

0:32:07.320 --> 0:32:09.040
<v Speaker 1>our first two games are gonna started by Rich Hill

0:32:09.040 --> 0:32:11.200
<v Speaker 1>and Jon Jon Rio and and now it won't be

0:32:11.240 --> 0:32:14.120
<v Speaker 1>started by by Rich Hill, just just Hans Jon Rio.

0:32:14.640 --> 0:32:16.560
<v Speaker 1>So any Dodger that you were thinking, oh, will he

0:32:16.640 --> 0:32:19.280
<v Speaker 1>make the rotation? Will he not? I I'm not sure

0:32:19.320 --> 0:32:22.960
<v Speaker 1>what are we gonna do. They're all gonna be in there.

0:32:22.160 --> 0:32:27.640
<v Speaker 1>You'reous stripling, They're all there. Man. Yeah. Look when it

0:32:27.640 --> 0:32:29.080
<v Speaker 1>comes to Rich Hill, I know a lot of people

0:32:29.120 --> 0:32:31.000
<v Speaker 1>get excited about him what he could do on a

0:32:31.000 --> 0:32:33.760
<v Speaker 1>per star basis, on a per ending basis, which makes

0:32:33.800 --> 0:32:36.720
<v Speaker 1>him better for rotistory leagues in my opinion, then for

0:32:36.880 --> 0:32:40.000
<v Speaker 1>points leagues. But you know he's always going to be

0:32:40.080 --> 0:32:42.480
<v Speaker 1>hurt at some point. Really the cap on him. His

0:32:42.600 --> 0:32:45.480
<v Speaker 1>upside is because he's constantly moving in and out of

0:32:45.520 --> 0:32:49.440
<v Speaker 1>the rotation because the injuries, whether their phantom aisle stins, whatever. Uh,

0:32:49.480 --> 0:32:50.880
<v Speaker 1>this is the way the Dodgers are gonna use them.

0:32:50.880 --> 0:32:53.120
<v Speaker 1>I believe it's I believe it's you Nick Pollack who

0:32:53.200 --> 0:32:57.880
<v Speaker 1>coined the term dodgeritis. The rich Hill already dealing with

0:32:58.000 --> 0:33:01.760
<v Speaker 1>dodgeritis here. Um I me coming in, I felt, you know,

0:33:01.800 --> 0:33:07.040
<v Speaker 1>the ceiling is a dty Ennings. Maybe Max, it could

0:33:07.040 --> 0:33:09.080
<v Speaker 1>be really good in those endings, But I don't have

0:33:09.120 --> 0:33:11.600
<v Speaker 1>shares of rich Hill just because I don't ever want

0:33:11.600 --> 0:33:14.000
<v Speaker 1>to deal with this headache. I know how good he

0:33:14.120 --> 0:33:15.480
<v Speaker 1>is and how good he could be on a per

0:33:15.560 --> 0:33:18.840
<v Speaker 1>star basis, but Nick me personally, I don't own any

0:33:18.840 --> 0:33:22.840
<v Speaker 1>shares of rich Hill, and I probably won't over the weekend, Frank,

0:33:22.920 --> 0:33:25.080
<v Speaker 1>because I have said exactly what you just said. I

0:33:25.160 --> 0:33:27.440
<v Speaker 1>think I had him at fifty nine in my initial

0:33:27.560 --> 0:33:29.640
<v Speaker 1>rankings for the year, just because I just didn't want

0:33:29.640 --> 0:33:32.360
<v Speaker 1>to deal with it. You know, you're when you own

0:33:32.400 --> 0:33:35.280
<v Speaker 1>a fantasy league through the year, we don't often take

0:33:35.320 --> 0:33:37.920
<v Speaker 1>into an account what it's like dealing with a player

0:33:39.120 --> 0:33:41.320
<v Speaker 1>having rich Hill, where you just maybe it's a weekly

0:33:41.400 --> 0:33:43.240
<v Speaker 1>league and you have to decide is Rachel going to

0:33:43.320 --> 0:33:46.080
<v Speaker 1>get that start is he not? I don't know. That's

0:33:46.120 --> 0:33:47.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of value to me. There's something to be

0:33:47.960 --> 0:33:50.760
<v Speaker 1>said about it. Cool, I I feel confident in this guy. Cool,

0:33:50.800 --> 0:33:53.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't feel confident in that guy. And Rachel you

0:33:53.160 --> 0:33:55.080
<v Speaker 1>just don't know what you're gonna get in a given weeks.

0:33:55.120 --> 0:33:57.040
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna start this time, is he not? Dave Roberts

0:33:57.080 --> 0:34:00.800
<v Speaker 1>won't say word until the day of. It's in predibly frustrating.

0:34:00.800 --> 0:34:02.040
<v Speaker 1>I just don't want anything to do with it. And

0:34:02.280 --> 0:34:04.880
<v Speaker 1>Richill isn't a player that I'm gonna lose my league

0:34:04.880 --> 0:34:07.800
<v Speaker 1>if I don't get the quote value for him. I don't.

0:34:08.239 --> 0:34:10.160
<v Speaker 1>I can just let someone else do that, And there's

0:34:10.200 --> 0:34:11.839
<v Speaker 1>so many other players that can go for so it's

0:34:11.840 --> 0:34:14.239
<v Speaker 1>an easy decision for me. I don't touch rich Hill.

0:34:14.640 --> 0:34:16.640
<v Speaker 1>It's it's of course he has a sore because he's

0:34:16.680 --> 0:34:19.239
<v Speaker 1>rich Hill, and that's how that's how it is. But

0:34:19.280 --> 0:34:21.359
<v Speaker 1>does rich Hill having that store Nye and we talked

0:34:21.360 --> 0:34:23.799
<v Speaker 1>about Dodgers last time You're on make you a little

0:34:23.800 --> 0:34:29.000
<v Speaker 1>bit more interested in a rush stripling type? Well, I

0:34:29.000 --> 0:34:35.719
<v Speaker 1>I always likes yeah, probably, Like you know point when

0:34:35.800 --> 0:34:38.360
<v Speaker 1>when you ask a question, great, you should probably, I

0:34:38.400 --> 0:34:40.560
<v Speaker 1>don't know what I was like, I don't want you

0:34:40.600 --> 0:34:42.600
<v Speaker 1>guys were locking eyes. It was a nice moment I

0:34:42.600 --> 0:34:46.560
<v Speaker 1>wanted you to have. That's fairly. I think everyone likes

0:34:46.640 --> 0:34:49.880
<v Speaker 1>the Dodger pictures, the ones that you know, look they

0:34:49.960 --> 0:34:53.040
<v Speaker 1>might bounce between the rotation, but you know, as Modifie

0:34:53.120 --> 0:34:55.680
<v Speaker 1>likes to call it, a magical mound out there in

0:34:55.840 --> 0:34:57.719
<v Speaker 1>l A. It seems like, you know, every picture they

0:34:57.719 --> 0:35:00.440
<v Speaker 1>put on that mound turns into gold, kind similar to

0:35:00.440 --> 0:35:03.080
<v Speaker 1>what the Houston Ashroods are able to do. But on

0:35:03.160 --> 0:35:06.720
<v Speaker 1>the first star basis, look hingin ryou Ross, Stripling, Kenton Mada.

0:35:06.760 --> 0:35:08.600
<v Speaker 1>I think they're all gonna be really good, even Julio

0:35:08.640 --> 0:35:12.000
<v Speaker 1>your eyes when they give them a shot. And my

0:35:12.680 --> 0:35:15.520
<v Speaker 1>college they're all going much later than rich Hill. So

0:35:15.560 --> 0:35:17.400
<v Speaker 1>it's like, why would you take Ridge Hill when you

0:35:17.400 --> 0:35:20.960
<v Speaker 1>can take you know, similar talented pictures who are all

0:35:21.040 --> 0:35:22.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of in the same boat and you get them

0:35:23.000 --> 0:35:25.160
<v Speaker 1>later on. So really, when it comes to me and

0:35:25.200 --> 0:35:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Dodgers starting pictures, I'll just take the one that's going

0:35:27.719 --> 0:35:30.680
<v Speaker 1>the latest in draft Greg because I really don't see

0:35:30.680 --> 0:35:34.239
<v Speaker 1>a lot of difference between these guys. Nick, you can

0:35:34.239 --> 0:35:38.400
<v Speaker 1>now talk what do you think about the rotation? It's funny,

0:35:38.680 --> 0:35:41.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm actually doing the the legacy League. That is that

0:35:41.320 --> 0:35:44.000
<v Speaker 1>the I have six leagues of the pitchless staff leagues

0:35:44.200 --> 0:35:46.920
<v Speaker 1>that's all relegation, and so the top league we called

0:35:46.920 --> 0:35:50.359
<v Speaker 1>the Legacy League, and I just drafted Kenta Maida after

0:35:50.480 --> 0:35:53.840
<v Speaker 1>Ross Stripling and after Richill because exactly that, let's just

0:35:53.880 --> 0:35:55.360
<v Speaker 1>I'll just take the last one. I knew it wouldn't

0:35:55.360 --> 0:35:58.279
<v Speaker 1>have to take Rachell. But I'm actually a little bit

0:35:58.280 --> 0:36:00.959
<v Speaker 1>out on Ross Stripling because if the Robberts has said

0:36:01.000 --> 0:36:04.120
<v Speaker 1>he is the fifth starter as opposed to the fourth

0:36:04.239 --> 0:36:06.880
<v Speaker 1>and kent to my ADA is higher up than Strippling

0:36:06.960 --> 0:36:09.600
<v Speaker 1>right now. And keep mind, yes, this knee is annoying

0:36:09.719 --> 0:36:11.560
<v Speaker 1>for for Richill, I don't think he's gonna be out

0:36:11.600 --> 0:36:13.839
<v Speaker 1>for a month. It'll probably be out for like two

0:36:13.840 --> 0:36:16.880
<v Speaker 1>weeks or something and get his start and clan Kershaw

0:36:16.920 --> 0:36:19.800
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be back mid April, late April. Ross Stripling

0:36:19.840 --> 0:36:22.680
<v Speaker 1>could be out of a job soon. Um yes, then

0:36:23.040 --> 0:36:25.920
<v Speaker 1>us waves at a fan and he's injured too. But

0:36:27.480 --> 0:36:30.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, that just keeps me on, just keeps me

0:36:30.239 --> 0:36:31.759
<v Speaker 1>on edge for Ross Stripling, and I want to go

0:36:31.800 --> 0:36:33.800
<v Speaker 1>after my ADA. I think in least in the beginning

0:36:34.840 --> 0:36:38.480
<v Speaker 1>with Arius, it's very interesting. I guess you can only

0:36:38.480 --> 0:36:41.080
<v Speaker 1>expect a hundred fifty innings. I think you're saying, Frank,

0:36:41.160 --> 0:36:42.600
<v Speaker 1>or maybe it was you Greg, that there are a

0:36:42.640 --> 0:36:44.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of these guys like your Whitley and your Paddock

0:36:44.640 --> 0:36:47.640
<v Speaker 1>and your it was Losardo in there. But we have

0:36:47.680 --> 0:36:49.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these young guys and we don't know

0:36:50.000 --> 0:36:51.600
<v Speaker 1>when they're going to get their opportunities, but we do

0:36:51.640 --> 0:36:54.200
<v Speaker 1>expect a hundred fifty for them. I think Arius is

0:36:54.440 --> 0:36:56.600
<v Speaker 1>very neglected in that in draft, so I think he's

0:36:56.600 --> 0:36:59.040
<v Speaker 1>actually a solid value if you want to deal with it. Um,

0:36:59.040 --> 0:37:01.400
<v Speaker 1>it's just a question of how the towners are going

0:37:01.440 --> 0:37:03.560
<v Speaker 1>to use them early and if you can kind of

0:37:03.760 --> 0:37:05.640
<v Speaker 1>roll with them or not. We have a lot more

0:37:05.680 --> 0:37:07.600
<v Speaker 1>to get to you with Nick Pollock, and not that

0:37:07.719 --> 0:37:09.520
<v Speaker 1>long to do it, in about twenty minutes or show.

0:37:09.600 --> 0:37:11.680
<v Speaker 1>So when we come back, I want to get Frank

0:37:11.840 --> 0:37:13.360
<v Speaker 1>versus Nick for once and I can see know the

0:37:13.360 --> 0:37:15.480
<v Speaker 1>sidelines in this Chris Kay, so that should be fun.

0:37:15.640 --> 0:37:17.200
<v Speaker 1>And then a couple of other late round guys that

0:37:17.239 --> 0:37:19.160
<v Speaker 1>are on my team that I hope Nick likes. So

0:37:19.280 --> 0:37:21.240
<v Speaker 1>we'll find out about that in the next twenty minutes.

0:37:21.280 --> 0:37:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Here the Fantasy best Friends Forever, The Fantasy Sports Network

0:37:30.560 --> 0:37:32.640
<v Speaker 1>is hitting you from all angles with the best fantasy

0:37:32.680 --> 0:37:35.440
<v Speaker 1>sports and betting analysis. You can catch the latest programming

0:37:35.480 --> 0:37:37.839
<v Speaker 1>on so many platforms there's no way you'll miss out

0:37:37.880 --> 0:37:40.160
<v Speaker 1>on any of the award winning programming. We pump out

0:37:40.200 --> 0:37:41.960
<v Speaker 1>every single debt and you can listen through the F

0:37:42.080 --> 0:37:45.400
<v Speaker 1>T S Y Radio app, I Heart Radio, tune in Radio, Stitcher,

0:37:45.520 --> 0:37:49.240
<v Speaker 1>download our podcast through iTunes, Google Play, Spotify, Audio Boom,

0:37:49.280 --> 0:37:51.360
<v Speaker 1>and you can watch select programming on the F and

0:37:51.400 --> 0:37:53.960
<v Speaker 1>T s Y YouTube channel or the Fantasy Sports Network,

0:37:54.040 --> 0:37:57.080
<v Speaker 1>your only source for fantasy sports and wagering anytime and

0:37:57.200 --> 0:38:01.600
<v Speaker 1>anywhere more. Sala two thousand and fifteen, two thousands and

0:38:01.600 --> 0:38:06.040
<v Speaker 1>sixteen European Long Drive Tour Champion two thousand seventeen, World

0:38:06.080 --> 0:38:12.920
<v Speaker 1>number one. Me personally, I keep my game face on

0:38:12.960 --> 0:38:18.360
<v Speaker 1>me all the time, especially coming out with the bucker

0:38:19.560 --> 0:38:24.080
<v Speaker 1>leaving the range or you're leaving the pors. What's your story?

0:38:24.520 --> 0:38:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Go to game fatis rooming dot com from all your

0:38:26.480 --> 0:38:32.920
<v Speaker 1>athletic facial wipes and body cleansing needs. Scout Fantasy Sports

0:38:33.480 --> 0:38:36.360
<v Speaker 1>is definitely good news him and his UH, one of

0:38:36.360 --> 0:38:39.440
<v Speaker 1>the top prospects, is crushed in the minor leagues. People

0:38:39.520 --> 0:38:41.799
<v Speaker 1>very excited for him, and he's generally been going in

0:38:41.800 --> 0:38:45.000
<v Speaker 1>the eighth ninth round of draft. So if you you

0:38:45.080 --> 0:38:47.160
<v Speaker 1>might have gotten a little bit of a discount over

0:38:47.200 --> 0:38:49.400
<v Speaker 1>the last day or so. Now that's not gonna happen.

0:38:49.400 --> 0:38:51.319
<v Speaker 1>I think you'll see the price rise because I would

0:38:51.320 --> 0:38:53.600
<v Speaker 1>expect him to begin the year with the White Sox

0:38:53.800 --> 0:38:55.640
<v Speaker 1>week days to the four pm Easter and on the

0:38:55.640 --> 0:38:58.879
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Sports Network and on your popular podcast providers can't

0:38:58.880 --> 0:39:02.080
<v Speaker 1>get enough fantasy football. Rhoto Experts has launched their NFL

0:39:03.000 --> 0:39:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football Package, which includes the best math based seasonal

0:39:06.320 --> 0:39:09.480
<v Speaker 1>projections and rankings available anywhere on the Internet, and Davis

0:39:09.480 --> 0:39:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Madig and the Rhoto Experts are providing dynasty season long betting,

0:39:12.880 --> 0:39:15.480
<v Speaker 1>best ball and NFL Draft content every day of the

0:39:15.560 --> 0:39:17.680
<v Speaker 1>year to give you an edge regardless of what type

0:39:17.680 --> 0:39:20.479
<v Speaker 1>of fantasy football you play. Save temper cent at roto

0:39:20.480 --> 0:39:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Experts dot com with the promo code V and T

0:39:22.680 --> 0:39:26.520
<v Speaker 1>s Y. It's the NFL three Fantasy Football package only

0:39:26.760 --> 0:39:30.279
<v Speaker 1>at Rhoto Experts dot Com. Joined the Experts live on

0:39:30.320 --> 0:39:33.160
<v Speaker 1>the air every day by calling in at April four

0:39:33.200 --> 0:39:47.960
<v Speaker 1>at six seven nine to join the Fantasy Sports Network

0:39:48.360 --> 0:39:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Back with you on the Fantasy Best Friends Forever Fantasy

0:39:51.160 --> 0:39:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Network. I keep it tangling myself. You're doing

0:39:56.560 --> 0:40:00.000
<v Speaker 1>over there, I see it. You are very tangled underneath

0:40:00.000 --> 0:40:04.440
<v Speaker 1>there too, all right, or you could just disconnect yourself

0:40:04.480 --> 0:40:06.200
<v Speaker 1>and do it in the middle of the show. Greg,

0:40:06.880 --> 0:40:10.799
<v Speaker 1>you're doing You're you're doing a great job to the

0:40:10.840 --> 0:40:14.200
<v Speaker 1>fantasy best friends forever here on the Fantasy Sports Network.

0:40:14.320 --> 0:40:16.319
<v Speaker 1>You heard Greg tease it up before the break, So

0:40:16.680 --> 0:40:18.960
<v Speaker 1>I'll just set that up here while he's he's doing

0:40:18.960 --> 0:40:21.040
<v Speaker 1>his thing over there. I want to talk to you

0:40:21.040 --> 0:40:22.839
<v Speaker 1>about Chris Archer. I thought we had a pretty cool

0:40:22.840 --> 0:40:26.600
<v Speaker 1>conversation about this at Folies. I've never been a Chris

0:40:26.680 --> 0:40:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Archer guy, so I can pretty much see why you

0:40:30.040 --> 0:40:33.000
<v Speaker 1>don't like drafting him for Fantasy Baseball purposes. But I

0:40:33.080 --> 0:40:36.080
<v Speaker 1>will say this about Chris Archer. In years past, you

0:40:36.120 --> 0:40:38.759
<v Speaker 1>had to use a fourth fifth round price tag for him.

0:40:38.800 --> 0:40:41.719
<v Speaker 1>Now you're getting anywhere from the eighth to tenth round

0:40:41.880 --> 0:40:44.680
<v Speaker 1>range as your SP three. A lot of the times,

0:40:44.719 --> 0:40:46.560
<v Speaker 1>you know normally he end up with him as your

0:40:46.600 --> 0:40:49.719
<v Speaker 1>SP one or your SP two. So I like the

0:40:49.760 --> 0:40:52.000
<v Speaker 1>price tag that we're getting on Archer now. And I

0:40:52.040 --> 0:40:55.440
<v Speaker 1>just think at that point in the draft, you're not

0:40:55.440 --> 0:40:57.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna find many pictures who could potentially give you two

0:40:57.800 --> 0:40:59.799
<v Speaker 1>and thirty strikeouts, And that's the number that I'm looking

0:40:59.840 --> 0:41:02.440
<v Speaker 1>at because before last season. The three years prior, he

0:41:02.480 --> 0:41:05.440
<v Speaker 1>went two endings pitched in each of those three seasons

0:41:05.440 --> 0:41:09.439
<v Speaker 1>from and at least two thirty three strikeouts and each

0:41:09.480 --> 0:41:12.279
<v Speaker 1>one of those seasons, I understood why people liked him.

0:41:12.280 --> 0:41:14.359
<v Speaker 1>But now you get him as your SP three rather

0:41:14.440 --> 0:41:17.080
<v Speaker 1>than in years past when your SP one and SP two,

0:41:17.239 --> 0:41:19.719
<v Speaker 1>So it gets a lot of swinging strike rate, the

0:41:19.760 --> 0:41:22.200
<v Speaker 1>oh swing. The chase rate was a career high last year.

0:41:22.480 --> 0:41:24.960
<v Speaker 1>And I know you were watching yesterday, Nick, I know

0:41:25.040 --> 0:41:27.120
<v Speaker 1>that there was some video, there were some gifts on

0:41:27.160 --> 0:41:30.799
<v Speaker 1>Twitter yesterday revolving Chris Archer and this changeup. So let's

0:41:30.840 --> 0:41:32.600
<v Speaker 1>see what he can do with that, how he builds

0:41:32.640 --> 0:41:34.759
<v Speaker 1>off that. Now I will give your piece as to

0:41:34.760 --> 0:41:37.880
<v Speaker 1>why you you avoid for Chris Archer. Um, you can

0:41:37.880 --> 0:41:39.920
<v Speaker 1>talk about that third pitch a little bit as well.

0:41:40.440 --> 0:41:43.040
<v Speaker 1>He's never really been able to develop it and have success.

0:41:43.080 --> 0:41:46.560
<v Speaker 1>So where is yours name? Well? All right, the biggest

0:41:46.680 --> 0:41:49.840
<v Speaker 1>argument I have against drafting Chris Archer is the fact

0:41:49.840 --> 0:41:53.640
<v Speaker 1>that Robbie Ray is going at the same price, and

0:41:53.960 --> 0:41:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Robbie Ray, if you really want to go after strikeouts,

0:41:56.520 --> 0:41:59.880
<v Speaker 1>he's just clearly the better option. Uh, Chris Archers at

0:42:00.040 --> 0:42:03.160
<v Speaker 1>restraight years of a four plus ear ray. Even in

0:42:03.200 --> 0:42:06.759
<v Speaker 1>his injured season last year, Uh, Robbie Ray still gave

0:42:06.840 --> 0:42:08.960
<v Speaker 1>you a sub four ear ray. And he obviously has

0:42:09.000 --> 0:42:11.080
<v Speaker 1>the ceiling of what he did in twousand seventeen with

0:42:11.120 --> 0:42:13.400
<v Speaker 1>a to eight ninety earra In that season, he had

0:42:13.440 --> 0:42:15.960
<v Speaker 1>two d eighteen strikeouts in both two thousand and sixteen

0:42:15.960 --> 0:42:18.480
<v Speaker 1>two and seventeen. You have to think he's gonna get

0:42:18.520 --> 0:42:20.680
<v Speaker 1>at least a hundred sixty innings this year, which would

0:42:20.760 --> 0:42:24.600
<v Speaker 1>constitute another two hundred plus strikeout. You here, And the

0:42:24.600 --> 0:42:27.040
<v Speaker 1>thing I hate about Archer is, yeah, we saw that

0:42:27.120 --> 0:42:29.239
<v Speaker 1>change up yesterday. That's nice. He actually had a couple

0:42:29.280 --> 0:42:31.920
<v Speaker 1>of games last year when that changeup was good. But

0:42:32.000 --> 0:42:34.400
<v Speaker 1>that's not a pitch that's good. I don't believe that

0:42:34.440 --> 0:42:35.880
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, now he has a change up

0:42:35.920 --> 0:42:38.239
<v Speaker 1>and it's great and he's gonna throw plus at the time.

0:42:38.280 --> 0:42:41.200
<v Speaker 1>I just don't buy that. So I if I don't

0:42:41.200 --> 0:42:43.399
<v Speaker 1>buy that, then I don't really see a clear path

0:42:43.480 --> 0:42:46.200
<v Speaker 1>for Archer to be much better than he was last year. Sure,

0:42:46.560 --> 0:42:48.120
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't have to be a four three one ear

0:42:48.160 --> 0:42:49.879
<v Speaker 1>a guy. He could be a three nine. He could

0:42:49.920 --> 0:42:53.680
<v Speaker 1>be around there. He could be a one one thirty whip.

0:42:54.000 --> 0:42:57.520
<v Speaker 1>That's fine. I don't think he has any room hearing

0:42:57.760 --> 0:42:59.920
<v Speaker 1>like three fifty year ray or so would he strike

0:43:00.000 --> 0:43:02.040
<v Speaker 1>outs and stuff? I just do not see that happening.

0:43:02.040 --> 0:43:04.640
<v Speaker 1>This changeup is it really has to take a massive

0:43:04.719 --> 0:43:07.440
<v Speaker 1>leap to get there, and I just don't go by that.

0:43:07.520 --> 0:43:09.479
<v Speaker 1>Chris Archer all of a sudden has this new pitch

0:43:09.520 --> 0:43:12.040
<v Speaker 1>and he's going to be incredible. Like I want to

0:43:12.040 --> 0:43:15.120
<v Speaker 1>get your thoughts um specifically here on Archer, but there

0:43:15.120 --> 0:43:16.839
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of pictures like this. John Gray comes

0:43:16.840 --> 0:43:19.719
<v Speaker 1>to mind as well, where see the peripherals and there's

0:43:19.760 --> 0:43:21.799
<v Speaker 1>so much better than the E R A. And this

0:43:21.880 --> 0:43:24.800
<v Speaker 1>was my argument for not drafting Archer last year because

0:43:24.800 --> 0:43:27.040
<v Speaker 1>he's in the fourth and fifth round. Is at some

0:43:27.080 --> 0:43:29.200
<v Speaker 1>point when you see three years in a row of

0:43:29.239 --> 0:43:31.880
<v Speaker 1>the E r A over four and the fIF and

0:43:31.920 --> 0:43:34.640
<v Speaker 1>the X fit are you know well below you know

0:43:35.000 --> 0:43:37.279
<v Speaker 1>four his ex fit last year three five nine, the

0:43:37.360 --> 0:43:39.920
<v Speaker 1>year before three three five, It's like, at some point

0:43:40.200 --> 0:43:42.440
<v Speaker 1>is this is the player that Chris Archer is Like,

0:43:42.480 --> 0:43:44.440
<v Speaker 1>he's just a four E R A guy And we

0:43:44.480 --> 0:43:46.719
<v Speaker 1>could throw the peripherals out the window because we now

0:43:46.760 --> 0:43:49.360
<v Speaker 1>have three years of data in a row of Chris

0:43:49.440 --> 0:43:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Archer being this picture with an e r A over four.

0:43:52.239 --> 0:43:55.080
<v Speaker 1>I think he has the talent to be a picture,

0:43:55.320 --> 0:43:57.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, to pitch to a three seven ear a,

0:43:57.640 --> 0:44:00.520
<v Speaker 1>but he hasn't done it since he hasn't had an

0:44:00.560 --> 0:44:03.799
<v Speaker 1>ear A below four. So how do you you know,

0:44:04.360 --> 0:44:06.120
<v Speaker 1>how did you break that down with with guys like

0:44:06.719 --> 0:44:08.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, three years in a row. Now we have

0:44:08.800 --> 0:44:11.280
<v Speaker 1>a large enough sample size, it's more of a trend

0:44:11.640 --> 0:44:13.600
<v Speaker 1>that Archer is gonna give you an EARRA over four.

0:44:14.280 --> 0:44:16.839
<v Speaker 1>So the question is what is dictating that trend? Why

0:44:16.920 --> 0:44:20.200
<v Speaker 1>about what Archer brings the table dictates that he should

0:44:20.200 --> 0:44:22.319
<v Speaker 1>have this separation. It's actually pretty simple. It's the same

0:44:22.320 --> 0:44:24.919
<v Speaker 1>thing with John Gray two is that Chris Chris Archer

0:44:24.920 --> 0:44:28.080
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have elite fastball command. He just doesn't. He's not

0:44:28.120 --> 0:44:30.000
<v Speaker 1>one of those guys that's gonna go up and into

0:44:30.040 --> 0:44:31.839
<v Speaker 1>a guy and then also go down in a way

0:44:31.920 --> 0:44:33.640
<v Speaker 1>and mess around and time of his zom this fastball.

0:44:33.680 --> 0:44:36.279
<v Speaker 1>He just isn't. That's not what he does well. So

0:44:36.360 --> 0:44:38.479
<v Speaker 1>this is why you're gonna see an elevated babbit from

0:44:38.480 --> 0:44:40.840
<v Speaker 1>elevator hit per nine from him. Why he has a

0:44:40.880 --> 0:44:43.640
<v Speaker 1>home umber five ball rate about four for three straight

0:44:43.719 --> 0:44:47.440
<v Speaker 1>years because he has as a fastball that when guys

0:44:47.440 --> 0:44:49.400
<v Speaker 1>are dead locked on it and they're not swinging at

0:44:49.400 --> 0:44:51.600
<v Speaker 1>that slider off the plate, that they're going to be

0:44:51.640 --> 0:44:53.880
<v Speaker 1>able to hit because he just doesn't have the precision

0:44:54.280 --> 0:44:57.160
<v Speaker 1>to put it where he wants and the ability just

0:44:57.200 --> 0:44:59.600
<v Speaker 1>stay on the edges. This is something I think is

0:44:59.640 --> 0:45:01.960
<v Speaker 1>always problem with Archer, and guess what, it's also a

0:45:01.960 --> 0:45:04.759
<v Speaker 1>problem for John Gray, which is really bad when you're

0:45:04.760 --> 0:45:07.080
<v Speaker 1>in Corps and a lot of those flyballs will go

0:45:07.120 --> 0:45:10.239
<v Speaker 1>out more so than any other park. Uh, it's it's

0:45:10.520 --> 0:45:12.520
<v Speaker 1>John Great. The whole John Gray situation is actually like

0:45:12.880 --> 0:45:15.720
<v Speaker 1>exactly as I talked about with Richel, just even worse,

0:45:16.160 --> 0:45:18.600
<v Speaker 1>where I do not want to trust John Gray at all.

0:45:18.920 --> 0:45:21.040
<v Speaker 1>There's no point in the season I will think, oh, hey,

0:45:21.200 --> 0:45:23.920
<v Speaker 1>I can trust John Gray. Now, this is wonderful, everything's

0:45:23.960 --> 0:45:25.840
<v Speaker 1>great now that I will not get to that point.

0:45:25.920 --> 0:45:28.080
<v Speaker 1>I just so I have him, like in seventy five

0:45:28.200 --> 0:45:30.879
<v Speaker 1>or so in mind, because it could be so bad

0:45:30.880 --> 0:45:33.200
<v Speaker 1>for you, tam so detrimental, and even if he does well,

0:45:33.280 --> 0:45:36.280
<v Speaker 1>you still will have hesitation and not get a proper

0:45:37.360 --> 0:45:40.000
<v Speaker 1>value on the trade market for him. Anyway, So you

0:45:40.040 --> 0:45:42.000
<v Speaker 1>have to still inherently take that risk even if he

0:45:42.040 --> 0:45:44.640
<v Speaker 1>does do well out of the gates. But I mean

0:45:44.680 --> 0:45:46.719
<v Speaker 1>with with Chris Archer, he's not going to get better

0:45:46.760 --> 0:45:48.160
<v Speaker 1>with that fast. But I don't really see him taking

0:45:48.160 --> 0:45:50.600
<v Speaker 1>a leap there, and the changeup isn't enough for me

0:45:50.680 --> 0:45:53.160
<v Speaker 1>to save him. I mean, I love strike Gray. He's

0:45:53.160 --> 0:45:56.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna get strikeouts, but at what cost. He's not gonna

0:45:56.160 --> 0:45:58.560
<v Speaker 1>go six and seven innings often. He's more of a

0:45:58.600 --> 0:46:01.360
<v Speaker 1>five and change kind of guy. It's just not for me.

0:46:01.400 --> 0:46:05.719
<v Speaker 1>It's not the kind of guy I want to go for.

0:46:05.719 --> 0:46:09.759
<v Speaker 1>For me. I hated John Guy a lot last year.

0:46:09.800 --> 0:46:12.120
<v Speaker 1>I was on that camp obviously, and then Frank and

0:46:12.120 --> 0:46:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Floria basically talked me into him at one point and

0:46:15.440 --> 0:46:17.560
<v Speaker 1>I picked him up. He was good, he was I

0:46:17.640 --> 0:46:19.520
<v Speaker 1>was I was the one with me screaming at Floria

0:46:19.600 --> 0:46:21.880
<v Speaker 1>saying we don't play in X fIF leagues now. So

0:46:21.960 --> 0:46:23.840
<v Speaker 1>he was kind of good for like a month and

0:46:23.840 --> 0:46:30.000
<v Speaker 1>then like it all went to hell. So now, just

0:46:30.000 --> 0:46:32.960
<v Speaker 1>just getting back to Archer, I just think, look, if

0:46:32.960 --> 0:46:34.560
<v Speaker 1>you're geting him as XP three, I think you have

0:46:34.640 --> 0:46:37.200
<v Speaker 1>enough of a buffer with your aces hopefully that you

0:46:37.239 --> 0:46:39.400
<v Speaker 1>know they'll they'll contribute enough in the r A and

0:46:39.440 --> 0:46:42.040
<v Speaker 1>whip where you can kind of swallow whatever Arch is

0:46:42.040 --> 0:46:43.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna give you. I still think he has the ability

0:46:43.640 --> 0:46:45.760
<v Speaker 1>to be a you know you mentioned at three seven,

0:46:45.880 --> 0:46:48.200
<v Speaker 1>three eight e r A, which doesn't completely kill you.

0:46:48.640 --> 0:46:51.759
<v Speaker 1>But if he can give you those two stricouts that

0:46:51.800 --> 0:46:54.480
<v Speaker 1>he did for the three years prior before last season,

0:46:54.680 --> 0:46:56.680
<v Speaker 1>I think that there's a lot of value in that. Greg.

0:46:56.800 --> 0:47:00.440
<v Speaker 1>So here's two. Here's the Chris Archer, the veloping that

0:47:00.520 --> 0:47:03.600
<v Speaker 1>third pickupping it works out this year. Um, I do

0:47:03.719 --> 0:47:06.640
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of exposure to him, but look, maybe

0:47:06.640 --> 0:47:07.960
<v Speaker 1>it's just one of those things where I need to

0:47:07.960 --> 0:47:10.640
<v Speaker 1>be burned by him one season first before I before

0:47:10.640 --> 0:47:13.080
<v Speaker 1>I jump off, Because again, I've never owned Chris Archer.

0:47:13.239 --> 0:47:14.960
<v Speaker 1>This is the first time that I'm jumping in, so

0:47:15.040 --> 0:47:17.000
<v Speaker 1>it's also the first time you've convinced me. It's my

0:47:17.040 --> 0:47:19.279
<v Speaker 1>first time jumping on Chris Archer as well, and so

0:47:19.680 --> 0:47:23.640
<v Speaker 1>so if he sucks, you're gonna kill me. Oh yes, Now. Now,

0:47:23.640 --> 0:47:25.520
<v Speaker 1>the one more point I will make is that I

0:47:25.560 --> 0:47:28.400
<v Speaker 1>said Robbie Ray is going at thirty one, Archer's at

0:47:28.400 --> 0:47:30.920
<v Speaker 1>thirty two. Well guess who's at thirty three, it's you, Darvish,

0:47:31.160 --> 0:47:33.799
<v Speaker 1>who also has the same kind of strikeout ability as

0:47:33.800 --> 0:47:36.560
<v Speaker 1>these guys. Yes, I know about Archer's innings and him

0:47:36.560 --> 0:47:39.319
<v Speaker 1>going two hundred a decent amount has a higher chance

0:47:39.400 --> 0:47:42.160
<v Speaker 1>necessarily to have a volume of strikeouts. But man, if

0:47:42.200 --> 0:47:44.800
<v Speaker 1>you want to talk about guy having upside with strikeout potential,

0:47:44.920 --> 0:47:47.279
<v Speaker 1>it's you, Darvish. Even with the blister thing, he's staring

0:47:47.320 --> 0:47:49.320
<v Speaker 1>a bullpen today and he should be fine for the

0:47:49.320 --> 0:47:51.600
<v Speaker 1>most part, maybe like missing one or two starts to

0:47:51.640 --> 0:47:54.080
<v Speaker 1>start the that's about it. I think that he can

0:47:54.120 --> 0:47:56.759
<v Speaker 1>be a much better value as your SP three than

0:47:56.840 --> 0:48:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Chris Archer at the same price. Nick, I know you

0:48:00.520 --> 0:48:03.440
<v Speaker 1>didn't really prepare for this, but I'll just throw throw

0:48:03.520 --> 0:48:06.320
<v Speaker 1>your r I think you don't have a fair answer

0:48:06.400 --> 0:48:09.280
<v Speaker 1>to this for me. In my you know, mid twenties

0:48:09.480 --> 0:48:12.319
<v Speaker 1>to mid thirties ranking, there's a lot of pictures that

0:48:12.360 --> 0:48:14.319
<v Speaker 1>are similar to this that we're talking about that could

0:48:14.360 --> 0:48:16.840
<v Speaker 1>be They could have they have high upside, but they

0:48:16.880 --> 0:48:18.960
<v Speaker 1>could be very volatile. I want to ask you who's

0:48:19.000 --> 0:48:21.880
<v Speaker 1>your favorite in this range? To me in my rankings,

0:48:21.920 --> 0:48:26.640
<v Speaker 1>I have a sto Miles Mikolas Chris Archer to Naka,

0:48:26.800 --> 0:48:28.520
<v Speaker 1>first Shaw, Savorina if you want to throw them in

0:48:28.560 --> 0:48:30.879
<v Speaker 1>the mix. But Robbie Ray, you Darvish just talked about

0:48:30.920 --> 0:48:33.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these players. Who's the one guy from

0:48:33.000 --> 0:48:35.640
<v Speaker 1>that group that has a lot of upside, very volatile

0:48:35.719 --> 0:48:38.280
<v Speaker 1>that you're targeting most. So first of all, we're acknowledging

0:48:38.280 --> 0:48:40.440
<v Speaker 1>that zach Whiler is way above this correct. Yeah, I

0:48:40.480 --> 0:48:43.560
<v Speaker 1>have Zachler ranked it. I haven't ranked sixteen. I don't know.

0:48:43.560 --> 0:48:45.400
<v Speaker 1>I yes, that's I did too. I think I do

0:48:45.480 --> 0:48:48.040
<v Speaker 1>now because of sevrena following. Yeah, that's that's what's that's

0:48:48.040 --> 0:48:50.520
<v Speaker 1>what's up Wheeler. I pulled him all the way up

0:48:50.560 --> 0:48:53.719
<v Speaker 1>the board in the NFBC main event. Actually nick I

0:48:53.800 --> 0:48:55.399
<v Speaker 1>took him in the early fourth round at like pick

0:48:55.520 --> 0:48:58.759
<v Speaker 1>forty nine. So basically putting my money where my mouth is,

0:48:58.920 --> 0:49:02.839
<v Speaker 1>I got him as my spe toho, I am. I'm

0:49:02.840 --> 0:49:05.200
<v Speaker 1>in on that. Miles Mikolass is my favorite one there.

0:49:05.239 --> 0:49:07.319
<v Speaker 1>I think the biggest question that people have is sure

0:49:07.400 --> 0:49:09.399
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna be a good low walk out, which means

0:49:09.400 --> 0:49:12.600
<v Speaker 1>that whip will be good. But what about those strikeouts?

0:49:12.760 --> 0:49:16.120
<v Speaker 1>I actually think hisself speaks to having more strikeouts this season.

0:49:16.360 --> 0:49:19.080
<v Speaker 1>It's a filthy slider. He's throwing ninety five as well,

0:49:19.320 --> 0:49:21.280
<v Speaker 1>and he is a guy that actually has good command

0:49:21.600 --> 0:49:24.520
<v Speaker 1>oftentimes at bats end A bit too early with him

0:49:24.560 --> 0:49:26.640
<v Speaker 1>because he is a little too zone friendly with that

0:49:26.719 --> 0:49:29.360
<v Speaker 1>slider and a curveball as well. I think he just

0:49:29.400 --> 0:49:31.320
<v Speaker 1>makes a small tweak there. I think he's going to

0:49:31.400 --> 0:49:33.759
<v Speaker 1>recognize it. My my biggest guest is that actually has

0:49:34.160 --> 0:49:36.600
<v Speaker 1>a slight struggle at some point and then he has

0:49:36.640 --> 0:49:38.719
<v Speaker 1>a shift away from it because it's like, all right, fine,

0:49:38.719 --> 0:49:41.120
<v Speaker 1>this isn't working anymore. I need to do something different,

0:49:41.120 --> 0:49:43.520
<v Speaker 1>and then that's actually going to be very successful. I

0:49:43.520 --> 0:49:46.560
<v Speaker 1>think he can be a three three year a guy

0:49:46.760 --> 0:49:50.239
<v Speaker 1>with a one fifteen whip and a twenty three k rader.

0:49:50.320 --> 0:49:52.600
<v Speaker 1>So I love that. I think Mikolass is going to

0:49:52.680 --> 0:49:54.400
<v Speaker 1>please a lot of owners at the price he's going for.

0:49:54.840 --> 0:49:56.600
<v Speaker 1>You know what, it reminds me a lot of Nick

0:49:56.800 --> 0:49:58.799
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know if you've ever kind of seen

0:49:58.840 --> 0:50:01.080
<v Speaker 1>this comp with him. I've always been a Michael Fulmer guy.

0:50:01.120 --> 0:50:03.360
<v Speaker 1>I know everything that's going on with him, he's dealing

0:50:03.400 --> 0:50:05.440
<v Speaker 1>with it. Looks like he's gonna have Tommy John. But

0:50:06.000 --> 0:50:08.120
<v Speaker 1>looking at Michael Fumer's numbers, I always thought that they

0:50:08.160 --> 0:50:12.200
<v Speaker 1>could be better than what they were because he and

0:50:12.239 --> 0:50:14.200
<v Speaker 1>he has a slider, right, so I always thought the

0:50:14.280 --> 0:50:16.520
<v Speaker 1>numbers could be better than they were. I kind of

0:50:16.520 --> 0:50:19.040
<v Speaker 1>see some comparisons here with michel Las two because you

0:50:19.080 --> 0:50:22.880
<v Speaker 1>know seventeen former has pretty good command and Michelas has

0:50:22.920 --> 0:50:26.560
<v Speaker 1>even better command. Fumer and gets gets a lot of

0:50:26.560 --> 0:50:29.280
<v Speaker 1>groundballs as well, so you kind of see I always

0:50:29.280 --> 0:50:31.560
<v Speaker 1>thought that Michael Fumer should be better than the numbers

0:50:31.560 --> 0:50:34.080
<v Speaker 1>that he gave us. It's a joke here at Picture List.

0:50:34.200 --> 0:50:35.839
<v Speaker 1>I mean I even when the when the news came

0:50:35.840 --> 0:50:37.680
<v Speaker 1>out that he's probably gonna get Tommy John, he said, up,

0:50:37.680 --> 0:50:39.120
<v Speaker 1>all right, I guess I have to lower Michael Falmer

0:50:39.200 --> 0:50:42.200
<v Speaker 1>to the seventies now because it's such a joke that, like,

0:50:42.239 --> 0:50:45.360
<v Speaker 1>I love Mike Michael Phmer more than anyone, and I

0:50:45.400 --> 0:50:47.719
<v Speaker 1>really do feel that a healthy Fomer does dictate a

0:50:47.840 --> 0:50:50.520
<v Speaker 1>top thirty, top forty starter, especially when still that change

0:50:50.600 --> 0:50:52.879
<v Speaker 1>up again. Uh. The one thing I will say about

0:50:52.880 --> 0:50:56.160
<v Speaker 1>Michael List above Falmer is he does have more offerings

0:50:56.160 --> 0:50:59.440
<v Speaker 1>that he trusts. Falmer has always danced around being a

0:50:59.520 --> 0:51:01.719
<v Speaker 1>hard fat us ball and slider and the changeup was

0:51:01.760 --> 0:51:03.759
<v Speaker 1>go in and out a bit Michael list with three

0:51:03.760 --> 0:51:07.080
<v Speaker 1>pitches that curb off for strikes, slider doing everything, fastball

0:51:07.000 --> 0:51:10.680
<v Speaker 1>around the zone. Those three themselves do more and provide

0:51:10.680 --> 0:51:13.160
<v Speaker 1>more depth for a variety for make Loss go deeper

0:51:13.160 --> 0:51:14.839
<v Speaker 1>into games. And then he also does have a split

0:51:14.920 --> 0:51:17.160
<v Speaker 1>change that isn't bad either and can induce whifts on

0:51:17.160 --> 0:51:19.239
<v Speaker 1>its own. It's just not as consistent because it's a

0:51:19.280 --> 0:51:23.359
<v Speaker 1>split change, and splitters overall are the most inconsistent pitch

0:51:23.400 --> 0:51:25.879
<v Speaker 1>of any type in the majors. So I understand why

0:51:25.880 --> 0:51:27.319
<v Speaker 1>he put down the back burner. That's a really good

0:51:27.360 --> 0:51:29.560
<v Speaker 1>decision by him. But yeah, I do see that comparison.

0:51:29.560 --> 0:51:31.279
<v Speaker 1>I really do think that Mike Loss, like I've been

0:51:31.280 --> 0:51:33.880
<v Speaker 1>saying about Falmer, could take that strikeout jump as well.

0:51:34.760 --> 0:51:36.680
<v Speaker 1>That's your position. I gotta get some. I gotta get

0:51:36.680 --> 0:51:40.880
<v Speaker 1>some Miko Lost shared basically based on that analysis from

0:51:40.960 --> 0:51:42.799
<v Speaker 1>just for the I don't have any shares of mikol Loss.

0:51:42.840 --> 0:51:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Just for the record, I should Chris Archer over Miles

0:51:44.560 --> 0:51:46.239
<v Speaker 1>mik Loss because of you. Let me be very clear,

0:51:47.719 --> 0:51:49.680
<v Speaker 1>you should ask me for my rankings. Great, because I

0:51:49.680 --> 0:51:52.319
<v Speaker 1>have Miko Loss ranked higher than Chris Archer. Well, if

0:51:52.360 --> 0:51:53.680
<v Speaker 1>you would have just asked me. I would have told

0:51:53.680 --> 0:51:56.520
<v Speaker 1>you take why I bought it on Chris Archer because

0:51:56.520 --> 0:51:58.759
<v Speaker 1>you told me I like Archer, Yes, but I have

0:51:58.880 --> 0:52:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Miko Loss ranked higher. So if you would have just

0:52:00.600 --> 0:52:01.960
<v Speaker 1>asked me what told you? I don't want to ask.

0:52:02.000 --> 0:52:04.120
<v Speaker 1>You were busy ignoring me in our other draft. Let

0:52:04.120 --> 0:52:06.200
<v Speaker 1>me ask you. Can't you take Archer over someone else?

0:52:06.200 --> 0:52:08.040
<v Speaker 1>I like too? I think you took him over Baber right, No,

0:52:08.600 --> 0:52:11.680
<v Speaker 1>yes I did, and her mom mar oh yeah, I

0:52:11.719 --> 0:52:14.960
<v Speaker 1>mean again Marquez below. I don't want to deal with it.

0:52:17.160 --> 0:52:19.279
<v Speaker 1>There are a lot of pictures in that range. How

0:52:19.320 --> 0:52:21.319
<v Speaker 1>do you How do you feel about beaver Nick? Because

0:52:21.320 --> 0:52:23.560
<v Speaker 1>I haven't really asked you about him, and I mean,

0:52:23.719 --> 0:52:26.880
<v Speaker 1>the helium is reaching new heights when it comes to Biber.

0:52:27.200 --> 0:52:29.319
<v Speaker 1>I saw Settler tweeting out that you know he might

0:52:29.360 --> 0:52:32.879
<v Speaker 1>crack the top one picks in NFBC Main Event drafts

0:52:32.920 --> 0:52:35.120
<v Speaker 1>this weekend over in Vegas. So where are you at

0:52:35.120 --> 0:52:37.279
<v Speaker 1>on Biber? Well? I blame you no Saris for that,

0:52:37.280 --> 0:52:39.040
<v Speaker 1>because I think he put him at twenty four and

0:52:39.160 --> 0:52:44.080
<v Speaker 1>his athletic ranking you have a twenty one. I might

0:52:44.120 --> 0:52:47.640
<v Speaker 1>be crazy, all right, All right, this is this is

0:52:47.680 --> 0:52:50.719
<v Speaker 1>how I feel about Beaver. He has one really good

0:52:50.760 --> 0:52:53.960
<v Speaker 1>pitch that's a slider. He's changed up. I think overperformed

0:52:54.000 --> 0:52:55.359
<v Speaker 1>a little bit, but it could be a very good

0:52:55.440 --> 0:52:58.680
<v Speaker 1>number two. I know we love the Caper walk stuff.

0:52:59.040 --> 0:53:01.920
<v Speaker 1>I hate the fact that he his fastball command is

0:53:01.920 --> 0:53:05.880
<v Speaker 1>is okay and he gives in so much. Um. I

0:53:05.880 --> 0:53:10.200
<v Speaker 1>always mess up the stat but essentially half of Bieber's

0:53:10.239 --> 0:53:12.560
<v Speaker 1>games where he had two walks or more last year

0:53:12.760 --> 0:53:15.560
<v Speaker 1>were zero and runs. That's rate when he walked at

0:53:15.600 --> 0:53:18.520
<v Speaker 1>least two batters. When he walked under two batters, he

0:53:18.600 --> 0:53:21.280
<v Speaker 1>only had one out of thirteen starts with zero and runs.

0:53:21.719 --> 0:53:24.400
<v Speaker 1>I think Bieber needs to nibble more. I think he

0:53:24.440 --> 0:53:28.239
<v Speaker 1>needs to be a little more, a little less predictable

0:53:28.920 --> 0:53:30.560
<v Speaker 1>with that heater, because I mean, that's why you have

0:53:30.640 --> 0:53:33.480
<v Speaker 1>that massive babbit, because he would just throw these meatballs

0:53:33.480 --> 0:53:36.080
<v Speaker 1>in the zone and it's not a hard fastball. It's

0:53:36.120 --> 0:53:37.960
<v Speaker 1>all like it's like mid up or nineties. Here we're

0:53:37.960 --> 0:53:42.040
<v Speaker 1>talking like ninety two. And in typical Indians fashion, that

0:53:42.239 --> 0:53:45.279
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't have a great fastball. So I don't think

0:53:45.280 --> 0:53:47.920
<v Speaker 1>that his secondary stuff is like Michael Clevinger's. It's not

0:53:47.960 --> 0:53:51.960
<v Speaker 1>like Bowers or Carrascoes or Clubber's. He really has one

0:53:52.239 --> 0:53:55.600
<v Speaker 1>of his slider and that's great. The changeup. I think

0:53:56.000 --> 0:53:57.799
<v Speaker 1>it needs him to do a lot of work if

0:53:57.840 --> 0:54:00.319
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be the same fastball and hopefully walks

0:54:00.320 --> 0:54:02.040
<v Speaker 1>for batters. If he's walking more batters. I know that's

0:54:02.040 --> 0:54:04.399
<v Speaker 1>crazy to say, but if he walks more, this could

0:54:04.400 --> 0:54:06.840
<v Speaker 1>turn out well. There's just a lot of work for

0:54:06.920 --> 0:54:09.080
<v Speaker 1>me for him to do, and that, for me is

0:54:09.400 --> 0:54:12.479
<v Speaker 1>making me not interested. I do have him over guys

0:54:12.480 --> 0:54:14.080
<v Speaker 1>like Tyler Glass now. There was a fun debate with

0:54:14.120 --> 0:54:16.879
<v Speaker 1>me and Sport earlier on the preseason about that. I've

0:54:17.080 --> 0:54:20.920
<v Speaker 1>now way out on Tyler Glass now, but I have

0:54:21.000 --> 0:54:23.560
<v Speaker 1>him around like the late thirties or so. That's how

0:54:23.600 --> 0:54:26.160
<v Speaker 1>I feel. I think there is opportunity, but it's expecting

0:54:26.200 --> 0:54:29.399
<v Speaker 1>a lot of growth for Beaver to get there. All right, Nick,

0:54:29.440 --> 0:54:31.080
<v Speaker 1>I hope you enjoyed your time here on the show

0:54:31.120 --> 0:54:35.520
<v Speaker 1>because you will never be definitely now, I'm just kidding. Look,

0:54:35.560 --> 0:54:37.960
<v Speaker 1>I think it's all fair points. I agree. I think

0:54:38.320 --> 0:54:39.799
<v Speaker 1>he can't live in the zone as much. That's why

0:54:39.840 --> 0:54:41.200
<v Speaker 1>you see the hard hit rate as high as it

0:54:41.280 --> 0:54:44.000
<v Speaker 1>was last year. The bad bit very high obviously, but

0:54:44.360 --> 0:54:46.279
<v Speaker 1>he gets a decent amount of swings and misses, so

0:54:46.280 --> 0:54:48.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm hoping he builds off that. And I really just

0:54:48.760 --> 0:54:52.439
<v Speaker 1>buy into the organization with the with the Cleveland Indians.

0:54:52.480 --> 0:54:54.440
<v Speaker 1>I know that they don't have Biggie Callaway anymore, but

0:54:54.560 --> 0:54:57.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is an organization that is known for

0:54:57.200 --> 0:55:01.920
<v Speaker 1>breeding starting pictures from you know, Clueber to Carrasco obviously Bower,

0:55:01.920 --> 0:55:04.560
<v Speaker 1>what happened last year? Levinger, what happened last year? I

0:55:04.600 --> 0:55:06.800
<v Speaker 1>don't know if I'm just buying into that narrative maybe

0:55:06.800 --> 0:55:09.160
<v Speaker 1>too much here, but I just trust that the Cleveland

0:55:09.160 --> 0:55:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Indians know how to develop these guys, and I really

0:55:12.120 --> 0:55:13.680
<v Speaker 1>do think that he's going to take that next step.

0:55:13.760 --> 0:55:16.600
<v Speaker 1>So that's that's why I'm as high as a mr

0:55:16.840 --> 0:55:18.600
<v Speaker 1>is probably the worst of that lot, by the way,

0:55:18.640 --> 0:55:21.799
<v Speaker 1>as far as it's raw talent, to be fair, I

0:55:21.880 --> 0:55:24.360
<v Speaker 1>have two minutes now officially have a lot more pictures

0:55:24.360 --> 0:55:28.439
<v Speaker 1>beside Shane Bieber, and there's Archer on this list. There

0:55:28.480 --> 0:55:30.440
<v Speaker 1>we go, let's do it, Let's do it. Rapid fire,

0:55:30.640 --> 0:55:35.080
<v Speaker 1>rapid fire. Here we go. Aaron Sanchez interrut I'm slightly

0:55:35.160 --> 0:55:37.080
<v Speaker 1>intoelve Teamer. Don't take the risk now see how he

0:55:37.120 --> 0:55:40.680
<v Speaker 1>shows up too many groundballs and not enough swing strikes.

0:55:41.239 --> 0:55:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Damn it. Zack Efflin in or out. I'm intrigued. He

0:55:44.880 --> 0:55:47.560
<v Speaker 1>needs to develop a third pitch more, but the fastball

0:55:47.560 --> 0:55:51.080
<v Speaker 1>slider itself should make him at the very least worthy

0:55:51.120 --> 0:55:53.560
<v Speaker 1>for good mouse streams early on, not the worst late round.

0:55:53.600 --> 0:55:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Pick Michael Paneda in or out, same kind of thing.

0:55:57.520 --> 0:56:00.359
<v Speaker 1>I don't really see a ceiling of being super high,

0:56:00.400 --> 0:56:03.560
<v Speaker 1>but late on to pick fine, he's gonna be a

0:56:03.640 --> 0:56:05.239
<v Speaker 1>cherry bomb. He's gonna be really great some games and

0:56:05.280 --> 0:56:10.959
<v Speaker 1>then just completely kill you. Others favorite Morland starting picture. Ah, man,

0:56:11.280 --> 0:56:13.239
<v Speaker 1>it's it's probably Pablo Lopez. I think he has the

0:56:13.280 --> 0:56:15.320
<v Speaker 1>highest ceiling of the group. It really just depends on

0:56:15.360 --> 0:56:18.240
<v Speaker 1>who gets the rotation spots. Trevor Richards is Jeremy Hellickson,

0:56:18.280 --> 0:56:20.120
<v Speaker 1>So I'm a little bit a little bit worried there.

0:56:21.360 --> 0:56:24.239
<v Speaker 1>It's an elite change up with a bad fastball, and

0:56:24.480 --> 0:56:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Caleb Smith actually has a lot of raw talent in there.

0:56:27.640 --> 0:56:29.720
<v Speaker 1>I think both Pabol Lopez and Caleb Smith are both

0:56:29.960 --> 0:56:33.440
<v Speaker 1>really good ads if they both have rotation spots. Matt Strong,

0:56:34.600 --> 0:56:36.239
<v Speaker 1>I love him. He's my He's been my guy since

0:56:36.239 --> 0:56:38.719
<v Speaker 1>like two thus seventeen. I'm getting him everywhere you have

0:56:38.760 --> 0:56:40.960
<v Speaker 1>to get out from him. Has been on this for like,

0:56:42.880 --> 0:56:46.160
<v Speaker 1>look up this guy on the Royals, Matt, I want

0:56:46.160 --> 0:56:48.600
<v Speaker 1>to get breakdown about him. Right on the Royals, I

0:56:48.640 --> 0:56:50.840
<v Speaker 1>was like, all right, this is what if he starts?

0:56:50.840 --> 0:56:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Because Jason Hamill kicked him out the last minute to

0:56:53.120 --> 0:56:56.560
<v Speaker 1>be in the rotation. It sucked. Final question, Matt Shoemaker

0:56:56.640 --> 0:56:59.799
<v Speaker 1>inter out, I'm out. I think he's too inconsistent. It's

0:56:59.800 --> 0:57:02.080
<v Speaker 1>a flit change and he's just worse than he used

0:57:02.080 --> 0:57:04.320
<v Speaker 1>to be when he had those excellent runs in Toronto.

0:57:04.440 --> 0:57:06.239
<v Speaker 1>Is not a good place to pitch, Nick Paula, thanks

0:57:06.239 --> 0:57:08.399
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us. Man has been blast. It's

0:57:08.400 --> 0:57:10.080
<v Speaker 1>been great to hear you think be here. Thanks so

0:57:10.120 --> 0:57:12.200
<v Speaker 1>much for having again pitch your list, and he don't

0:57:12.200 --> 0:57:13.960
<v Speaker 1>over to pitch your list for all your pitching needs

0:57:14.000 --> 0:57:15.719
<v Speaker 1>and more ventures up next