1 00:00:02,520 --> 00:00:07,040 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News. 2 00:00:10,720 --> 00:00:14,120 Speaker 2: Welcome to the Daybreak Asia podcast. I'm Doug Chrisner. Today 3 00:00:14,160 --> 00:00:17,079 Speaker 2: we'll begin with the FED and FED Shair J. Powell 4 00:00:17,160 --> 00:00:20,560 Speaker 2: saying today that policymakers will likely have a difficult road 5 00:00:20,560 --> 00:00:23,960 Speaker 2: ahead as they weigh further cuts to interest rates. Here 6 00:00:24,040 --> 00:00:26,960 Speaker 2: is Powell speaking earlier to the Greater Providence Chamber of 7 00:00:27,040 --> 00:00:28,640 Speaker 2: Commerce in Rhode Island. 8 00:00:28,840 --> 00:00:32,120 Speaker 3: Near term risks to inflation are tilted to the upside 9 00:00:32,400 --> 00:00:35,960 Speaker 3: and risks to employment are tilted to the downside, a 10 00:00:36,080 --> 00:00:40,479 Speaker 3: challenging situation. Two sided risks mean that there is no 11 00:00:40,720 --> 00:00:41,600 Speaker 3: risk free path. 12 00:00:42,080 --> 00:00:44,960 Speaker 2: Powell offered no hints on whether he might support a 13 00:00:45,040 --> 00:00:48,200 Speaker 2: rate cut at the Fed's next meeting in October. Momentarily, 14 00:00:48,240 --> 00:00:51,519 Speaker 2: we'll have some reaction from the Asia Pacific. First, we'll 15 00:00:51,640 --> 00:00:54,960 Speaker 2: check in Stateside with Rob Hayworth. He is senior portfolio 16 00:00:55,000 --> 00:00:58,200 Speaker 2: manager at US Bank Wealth Management. Rob, thank you so 17 00:00:58,280 --> 00:01:00,400 Speaker 2: much for making time to chat with me. Let's begin 18 00:01:00,440 --> 00:01:02,760 Speaker 2: with the Powell story here. I wouldn't call it a 19 00:01:02,800 --> 00:01:06,039 Speaker 2: pivot necessarily, but can we agree that it's a bit 20 00:01:06,040 --> 00:01:07,920 Speaker 2: of a recalibration toward balance. 21 00:01:08,360 --> 00:01:10,600 Speaker 1: Yeah, Doug, great to be with you. I agree it 22 00:01:10,640 --> 00:01:14,520 Speaker 1: is more of a recalibration. When we left the press 23 00:01:14,560 --> 00:01:17,840 Speaker 1: conference last week, I think the market certainly felt that 24 00:01:17,920 --> 00:01:21,080 Speaker 1: we were on a path for more rate cuts, and 25 00:01:21,800 --> 00:01:25,800 Speaker 1: the chair pals speech today certainly gave some indication that 26 00:01:25,840 --> 00:01:28,959 Speaker 1: there's a little more equivocation around do we really need 27 00:01:29,000 --> 00:01:31,920 Speaker 1: another cut if he sees inflation being more of a 28 00:01:31,959 --> 00:01:36,040 Speaker 1: problem than employment. I think, and we saw that today 29 00:01:36,080 --> 00:01:39,199 Speaker 1: in the reaction in small companies relative to large where 30 00:01:39,200 --> 00:01:41,760 Speaker 1: they'd had a good run early in the day and 31 00:01:41,840 --> 00:01:43,840 Speaker 1: ended up selling off quite a bit. So I think 32 00:01:43,880 --> 00:01:48,000 Speaker 1: the market is a little concern that chairpell may be 33 00:01:48,080 --> 00:01:50,400 Speaker 1: equivocating a little more on that October rate cut. 34 00:01:50,600 --> 00:01:52,760 Speaker 2: So how do you feel about the inflation story as 35 00:01:52,760 --> 00:01:55,160 Speaker 2: it relates to tariff. I guess the longer end of 36 00:01:55,160 --> 00:01:57,920 Speaker 2: the curve has been pretty well behaved, so at this 37 00:01:58,000 --> 00:02:00,840 Speaker 2: point the market doesn't appear to be alarmed at all. 38 00:02:01,000 --> 00:02:03,760 Speaker 1: No, I don't think the market is alarmed yet about inflation, 39 00:02:03,920 --> 00:02:06,680 Speaker 1: but it is something we're watching and if we look right, 40 00:02:07,000 --> 00:02:09,560 Speaker 1: we'll certainly get more updates with PCE at the end 41 00:02:09,639 --> 00:02:13,400 Speaker 1: of the week. But inflation has been notching high, or 42 00:02:13,440 --> 00:02:15,359 Speaker 1: if we look at year every year rates of inflation 43 00:02:15,440 --> 00:02:18,320 Speaker 1: we've seen a couple of ticks higher, and looking back, 44 00:02:18,440 --> 00:02:21,080 Speaker 1: say a quarter ago, we're definitely above the rates we 45 00:02:21,080 --> 00:02:24,359 Speaker 1: were seeing a quarter ago. So that's something that could continue. 46 00:02:24,400 --> 00:02:28,079 Speaker 1: It doesn't seem persistent at this point, but it is elevated, 47 00:02:28,160 --> 00:02:30,440 Speaker 1: and that has to be concerning for the Federal Reserve 48 00:02:30,520 --> 00:02:32,200 Speaker 1: with that inflation mandate that they have. 49 00:02:32,600 --> 00:02:35,680 Speaker 2: So in today's price section, the AI trade seemed to 50 00:02:35,680 --> 00:02:37,799 Speaker 2: take a bit of a breather. I think there were 51 00:02:37,840 --> 00:02:41,360 Speaker 2: some concerns about maybe tech being overbought, some worries as 52 00:02:41,400 --> 00:02:45,080 Speaker 2: well about margin risk. How do you see the trade 53 00:02:45,120 --> 00:02:47,680 Speaker 2: around artificial intelligence. 54 00:02:48,960 --> 00:02:51,200 Speaker 1: Well, certainly it's been a great run all of a 55 00:02:51,200 --> 00:02:53,000 Speaker 1: sudden this year. I think if we were having this 56 00:02:53,080 --> 00:02:56,160 Speaker 1: conversation a few months ago, Doug, we would have been 57 00:02:56,160 --> 00:03:00,040 Speaker 1: talking about how challenging it was in artificial intelligence in 58 00:03:00,080 --> 00:03:02,600 Speaker 1: April and May, and we turn around and all of 59 00:03:02,600 --> 00:03:06,720 Speaker 1: a sudden, technology communication services are at the top of 60 00:03:06,760 --> 00:03:10,200 Speaker 1: the heap again, with artificial intelligence leading the way. I 61 00:03:10,200 --> 00:03:15,239 Speaker 1: think as we look at it, we're worried about elevated valuations, 62 00:03:15,240 --> 00:03:18,120 Speaker 1: but when we look at the fundamentals, we see strong 63 00:03:18,200 --> 00:03:22,000 Speaker 1: underpinnings here. We're seeing actual earnings, we're seeing revenue growth, 64 00:03:22,520 --> 00:03:25,760 Speaker 1: and we're seeing in innovation that while it may take 65 00:03:25,919 --> 00:03:29,880 Speaker 1: time to develop as to where everyone uses it and 66 00:03:29,919 --> 00:03:33,040 Speaker 1: where we use it every day, and how does that monetize, 67 00:03:33,480 --> 00:03:36,520 Speaker 1: the investment that has to happen today is real and 68 00:03:36,680 --> 00:03:39,560 Speaker 1: large and is going to spill over into many other 69 00:03:39,640 --> 00:03:44,080 Speaker 1: sectors besides just say the hyperscalers. We're trying to package 70 00:03:44,080 --> 00:03:45,520 Speaker 1: that data and those models together. 71 00:03:45,640 --> 00:03:48,440 Speaker 2: We heard from Micron Technology after the bell, and the 72 00:03:48,480 --> 00:03:51,560 Speaker 2: company gave a very positive forecast for revenue in the 73 00:03:51,600 --> 00:03:54,280 Speaker 2: current quarter. Micron, as we know, is a big maker 74 00:03:54,320 --> 00:03:57,280 Speaker 2: of those high bandwidth memory chips that are used in 75 00:03:57,520 --> 00:04:02,280 Speaker 2: artificial intelligence computing. But I'm wondering if perhaps in the 76 00:04:02,320 --> 00:04:04,840 Speaker 2: near term, we were to get some indication of a 77 00:04:04,920 --> 00:04:08,840 Speaker 2: misstep a company linked to the AI space that provided 78 00:04:09,080 --> 00:04:12,240 Speaker 2: maybe a slight indication that the mark is being missed. 79 00:04:12,880 --> 00:04:15,320 Speaker 2: I'm curious to get your take on the vulnerability of 80 00:04:15,320 --> 00:04:17,840 Speaker 2: some of these names to any slight disappointment. 81 00:04:20,320 --> 00:04:24,640 Speaker 1: Yeah, I think we're certainly valuations are elevated. There is 82 00:04:24,760 --> 00:04:28,880 Speaker 1: room for a reset here in terms of valuation, particularly 83 00:04:28,920 --> 00:04:31,760 Speaker 1: because it seems like we're priced to that perfection. 84 00:04:31,880 --> 00:04:32,040 Speaker 4: Now. 85 00:04:32,080 --> 00:04:35,239 Speaker 1: Companies have been delivering right the revenues have been coming through, 86 00:04:35,560 --> 00:04:37,880 Speaker 1: the orders have been coming through, but if we do 87 00:04:37,960 --> 00:04:41,479 Speaker 1: miss out on that perfection, we may see a reset 88 00:04:41,760 --> 00:04:46,920 Speaker 1: like we've seen earlier this year. Probably not the same magnitude, 89 00:04:46,960 --> 00:04:50,880 Speaker 1: but there could be that reset until we find the 90 00:04:50,960 --> 00:04:55,520 Speaker 1: level at which maybe orders are hitting. And that's kind 91 00:04:55,520 --> 00:04:58,040 Speaker 1: of the challenge. When we look at Nvidio earnings and 92 00:04:58,080 --> 00:05:01,080 Speaker 1: other earnings, the orders are clearly there, maybe it's not 93 00:05:01,200 --> 00:05:03,840 Speaker 1: hitting every It could maybe not hit every segment of 94 00:05:03,880 --> 00:05:06,400 Speaker 1: the market, and that may bring in a little more 95 00:05:06,480 --> 00:05:08,000 Speaker 1: question as to the forward path. 96 00:05:08,200 --> 00:05:11,200 Speaker 2: When we talk about the AI trade frequently we bring 97 00:05:11,240 --> 00:05:13,840 Speaker 2: in the energy story as a part of the conversation. 98 00:05:13,960 --> 00:05:17,479 Speaker 2: How are you feeling about some of the big energy names. 99 00:05:17,520 --> 00:05:20,119 Speaker 2: Are they potentially a little stretched as well? 100 00:05:21,000 --> 00:05:23,240 Speaker 1: We don't think they're stretched at this point. Data is 101 00:05:23,320 --> 00:05:27,160 Speaker 1: at the heart of this of artificial intelligence, and that 102 00:05:27,200 --> 00:05:30,880 Speaker 1: includes data centers and electricity to power those data centers 103 00:05:30,920 --> 00:05:34,000 Speaker 1: just so we can run those large language models. That's 104 00:05:34,040 --> 00:05:36,240 Speaker 1: an element of the market that is probably not run 105 00:05:36,320 --> 00:05:38,360 Speaker 1: quite as far, quite as fast as some of the 106 00:05:38,360 --> 00:05:41,360 Speaker 1: more well known names, and that's investment that has to 107 00:05:41,400 --> 00:05:44,920 Speaker 1: happen through time. So we would look to utilities, particularly 108 00:05:44,920 --> 00:05:49,240 Speaker 1: those with mixed power generation as one way to participate 109 00:05:49,320 --> 00:05:51,680 Speaker 1: in this rally as they look to build out that 110 00:05:51,839 --> 00:05:57,240 Speaker 1: capacity to support data centers in this AI endeavor through time. 111 00:05:57,680 --> 00:05:59,920 Speaker 2: Are you putting on hedges right now to protect again 112 00:06:00,000 --> 00:06:01,520 Speaker 2: and still a little bit of downside. 113 00:06:02,120 --> 00:06:05,640 Speaker 1: No, we're actually in a glass half full environment in 114 00:06:05,640 --> 00:06:08,760 Speaker 1: our view where we're still overweight equity. If we have 115 00:06:08,920 --> 00:06:12,360 Speaker 1: any hedge, we'd be watching inflation, and so we'd add 116 00:06:12,400 --> 00:06:16,400 Speaker 1: inflation sensitive assets to portfolios as well. For us, the 117 00:06:16,480 --> 00:06:20,839 Speaker 1: primary measures there would be treasury inflation protected securities relative 118 00:06:20,880 --> 00:06:23,560 Speaker 1: to owning just investment grade bonds. And then on the 119 00:06:23,640 --> 00:06:25,400 Speaker 1: equity side of the ledger, we would blend in some 120 00:06:25,520 --> 00:06:30,240 Speaker 1: global infrastructure which offers that diversification in terms of utilities, 121 00:06:30,680 --> 00:06:35,440 Speaker 1: midstream energy, trade and trans some trade and transportation. But 122 00:06:35,600 --> 00:06:39,240 Speaker 1: you get to participate in kind of higher inflation through 123 00:06:39,279 --> 00:06:41,640 Speaker 1: earnings growth in those companies, and we think that provides 124 00:06:41,680 --> 00:06:45,080 Speaker 1: a little inflation protection in your portfolio which you could need. 125 00:06:45,160 --> 00:06:49,080 Speaker 2: So are there foreign jurisdictions where you're primarily focused? Is 126 00:06:49,120 --> 00:06:53,400 Speaker 2: it Europe? Is it more Asia? Right now, we're more. 127 00:06:53,240 --> 00:06:56,640 Speaker 1: Globally diversified at this point. We're looking across the spectrum 128 00:06:56,680 --> 00:06:59,960 Speaker 1: we we're certainly seeing an uptick in earnings growth around 129 00:07:00,080 --> 00:07:02,960 Speaker 1: the world. It's not quite as strong as US earnings growth, 130 00:07:02,960 --> 00:07:05,320 Speaker 1: but it is an improvement from where it's been, so 131 00:07:05,400 --> 00:07:09,960 Speaker 1: we would look actually broadly across the developed and emerging markets. 132 00:07:10,960 --> 00:07:14,760 Speaker 2: So I'm also wondering about where geopolitical risk enters your thinking. 133 00:07:14,800 --> 00:07:17,400 Speaker 2: We've got the UN General Assembly here in New York 134 00:07:17,480 --> 00:07:20,320 Speaker 2: this week. A lot certainly has been made of this gathering, 135 00:07:20,720 --> 00:07:22,880 Speaker 2: many things to talk about, not the least of which 136 00:07:23,280 --> 00:07:27,320 Speaker 2: war in Ukraine. How are you feeling about geopolitics as 137 00:07:27,360 --> 00:07:29,440 Speaker 2: a part of approaching markets these days? 138 00:07:30,680 --> 00:07:33,800 Speaker 1: Well, I think the good news for us it's been 139 00:07:33,840 --> 00:07:36,880 Speaker 1: horrible news for those impacted. I mean, our hearts certainly 140 00:07:36,920 --> 00:07:40,240 Speaker 1: go out to those in Russia and Ukraine impacted by 141 00:07:40,240 --> 00:07:43,920 Speaker 1: these conflicts in Gaza as well. But the good news 142 00:07:44,000 --> 00:07:47,800 Speaker 1: is the market's been somewhat insulated from this because we've 143 00:07:47,840 --> 00:07:50,120 Speaker 1: been able to work around it. I think getting the 144 00:07:50,200 --> 00:07:54,680 Speaker 1: resolution will be generally constructive for the markets, and the 145 00:07:54,680 --> 00:07:58,920 Speaker 1: markets can put it behind them. If there's some contagion 146 00:07:59,120 --> 00:08:01,480 Speaker 1: or spread to them at risk we could have a 147 00:08:01,520 --> 00:08:04,320 Speaker 1: near term hiccup, but doesn't seem like that's the case 148 00:08:04,320 --> 00:08:06,600 Speaker 1: for now, but that's something we have to watch and 149 00:08:06,600 --> 00:08:09,000 Speaker 1: be aware of, but not a base case and not 150 00:08:09,040 --> 00:08:10,640 Speaker 1: a core of our strategy. 151 00:08:10,160 --> 00:08:13,440 Speaker 2: At this point. So you mentioned the PCE, which we 152 00:08:13,480 --> 00:08:16,400 Speaker 2: will get on Friday. We'll also have data in terms 153 00:08:16,440 --> 00:08:20,320 Speaker 2: of personal income and spending. And I'm wondering before we 154 00:08:20,480 --> 00:08:23,480 Speaker 2: let you go here, how you're viewing the American consumer. 155 00:08:25,880 --> 00:08:27,840 Speaker 1: Yeah. I think the good news here is the American 156 00:08:27,880 --> 00:08:32,160 Speaker 1: consumer has really been quite solid. We're along with Terror Powell, 157 00:08:32,240 --> 00:08:34,520 Speaker 1: we're watching what's going on with the labor market. That 158 00:08:34,640 --> 00:08:38,080 Speaker 1: softening is something that has us concerned about not taking 159 00:08:38,120 --> 00:08:41,679 Speaker 1: action at this point, but incomes are up. We're not 160 00:08:41,760 --> 00:08:46,800 Speaker 1: really seeing layoffs right, Jobless claims remain low, and consumers 161 00:08:46,800 --> 00:08:51,280 Speaker 1: are spending. The Johnson Redbook weekly year over year of 162 00:08:51,320 --> 00:08:54,640 Speaker 1: retail sales at five point seven percent. Retail sales for 163 00:08:54,679 --> 00:08:57,600 Speaker 1: the month of August came in fairly solid. So this 164 00:08:57,679 --> 00:09:02,160 Speaker 1: looks like a reasonably healthy concernsumer that is holding up 165 00:09:02,160 --> 00:09:06,120 Speaker 1: this economy to some great extent. And as long as 166 00:09:06,160 --> 00:09:10,840 Speaker 1: they remain employed and their incomes continue to grow even modestly, 167 00:09:11,040 --> 00:09:13,800 Speaker 1: I think we're on solid footing and that gives us 168 00:09:13,840 --> 00:09:17,400 Speaker 1: that glass half full perspective. On the economy of markets 169 00:09:17,440 --> 00:09:17,880 Speaker 1: at this point. 170 00:09:18,080 --> 00:09:20,280 Speaker 2: So is the FED though a little bit behind the curve, 171 00:09:20,440 --> 00:09:20,920 Speaker 2: do you think? 172 00:09:22,920 --> 00:09:26,280 Speaker 1: I think it's not really for us to say at 173 00:09:26,280 --> 00:09:29,640 Speaker 1: this point. I don't think that they've damaged the labor 174 00:09:29,679 --> 00:09:32,320 Speaker 1: market just yet, but we know labors can be such 175 00:09:32,320 --> 00:09:37,240 Speaker 1: a lagging indicator. But they're certainly tighter than they perhaps 176 00:09:37,280 --> 00:09:39,120 Speaker 1: need to be. That there's room for them to get 177 00:09:39,160 --> 00:09:43,000 Speaker 1: back to neutral, and I think that's certainly something we've 178 00:09:43,000 --> 00:09:46,280 Speaker 1: seen the market cheer and we'd look forward to as well. Right, 179 00:09:46,320 --> 00:09:48,559 Speaker 1: there's room for them to get back into that three 180 00:09:48,720 --> 00:09:53,160 Speaker 1: three and a half percent neutral rate for themselves, and 181 00:09:53,200 --> 00:09:56,000 Speaker 1: that would be actually helpful to the economy as well. 182 00:09:56,240 --> 00:09:57,920 Speaker 2: Rob will leave it there, Thank you so very much. 183 00:09:58,040 --> 00:10:01,120 Speaker 2: Rob Hayworth, as senior portfolio man. You're at the US 184 00:10:01,240 --> 00:10:03,959 Speaker 2: Bank Wealth Management, joining us on the line on the 185 00:10:04,040 --> 00:10:15,080 Speaker 2: Daybreak Asia podcast. Welcome back to the Daybreak Asia podcast 186 00:10:15,120 --> 00:10:18,800 Speaker 2: time Doug Krisner. Markets across the Asia Pacific are reacting 187 00:10:18,880 --> 00:10:22,440 Speaker 2: to comments earlier from fedsher Jay Powell. He said the 188 00:10:22,440 --> 00:10:25,080 Speaker 2: FED will likely have a difficult road ahead as it 189 00:10:25,120 --> 00:10:28,080 Speaker 2: weighs further cuts and interest rates. We got the views 190 00:10:28,080 --> 00:10:31,520 Speaker 2: of John Authur's senior editor for Markets, and he's a 191 00:10:31,520 --> 00:10:35,480 Speaker 2: Bloomberg opinion columnist. John spoke in Tokyo with Bloomberg TV 192 00:10:35,600 --> 00:10:36,679 Speaker 2: host Avril Ham. 193 00:10:37,120 --> 00:10:39,040 Speaker 4: Let's talk about the FED. I mean, when you look 194 00:10:39,080 --> 00:10:44,319 Speaker 4: at what Powell said overnight, he's not seeing anything materially new. 195 00:10:44,480 --> 00:10:48,720 Speaker 4: He's flagging rices on both sides, inflation and labor market weakness. 196 00:10:48,800 --> 00:10:51,520 Speaker 4: I mean, what do you make of the messaging. 197 00:10:51,720 --> 00:10:55,959 Speaker 5: Well, in the context of the FED, the messaging continues 198 00:10:56,000 --> 00:10:59,880 Speaker 5: to matter. He could have started making much more of 199 00:10:59,880 --> 00:11:02,640 Speaker 5: a us about unemployments and he's not doing that, and 200 00:11:02,679 --> 00:11:06,240 Speaker 5: he is still seeing the situation as being balanced. We've 201 00:11:06,320 --> 00:11:09,800 Speaker 5: had various Powell pivots, as they tend to get known, 202 00:11:10,400 --> 00:11:13,400 Speaker 5: in his eight years in charge. If he was very 203 00:11:13,440 --> 00:11:15,600 Speaker 5: clearly convinced that he was going to need to keep 204 00:11:15,640 --> 00:11:19,040 Speaker 5: cutting from here, he would be saying So. It looks 205 00:11:19,080 --> 00:11:23,400 Speaker 5: to me as though he is somewhat more confident than 206 00:11:23,440 --> 00:11:26,280 Speaker 5: he was a week ago. There's obviously immense amounts of 207 00:11:26,360 --> 00:11:29,679 Speaker 5: politics flowing around the FED at the moment. There's going 208 00:11:29,720 --> 00:11:34,839 Speaker 5: to be an almighty battle over exactly how independent it's 209 00:11:34,880 --> 00:11:39,200 Speaker 5: allowed to be once he stands down. But I think 210 00:11:39,240 --> 00:11:42,079 Speaker 5: he feels that he's more or less back in control 211 00:11:42,640 --> 00:11:46,160 Speaker 5: of the situation, or he wouldn't have been that open minded. 212 00:11:47,440 --> 00:11:50,000 Speaker 4: Do you think they should cut in October? 213 00:11:51,280 --> 00:11:57,040 Speaker 5: Probably? But I don't regard it as a completely done deal. Again, 214 00:11:58,520 --> 00:12:01,319 Speaker 5: they say they're data dependent and should be. I imagine 215 00:12:01,360 --> 00:12:03,440 Speaker 5: the data are going to move such that you do 216 00:12:03,520 --> 00:12:08,360 Speaker 5: want to cut again, But I can the tariff input 217 00:12:08,600 --> 00:12:12,280 Speaker 5: is in there in the inflation data. It's only very minor. 218 00:12:13,440 --> 00:12:16,439 Speaker 5: If you see that begin to pick up very significantly, 219 00:12:16,679 --> 00:12:21,360 Speaker 5: then you do probably have a picture. Well, a very 220 00:12:21,400 --> 00:12:24,320 Speaker 5: serious problem for the FED when you've got stagflation, and 221 00:12:24,360 --> 00:12:28,080 Speaker 5: they probably do have to arrest the decline there. And 222 00:12:28,120 --> 00:12:29,680 Speaker 5: then the other. 223 00:12:29,480 --> 00:12:33,400 Speaker 4: Thing about terrorists and inflation is how China seems to 224 00:12:33,440 --> 00:12:38,840 Speaker 4: be flooding, you know, markets with their goods. Yes, are 225 00:12:38,840 --> 00:12:41,200 Speaker 4: we already seeing these signs of this China shop two 226 00:12:41,200 --> 00:12:43,839 Speaker 4: point or three point zero and house of view? Might 227 00:12:43,880 --> 00:12:46,600 Speaker 4: that be for Asian economies and perhaps markets? 228 00:12:47,160 --> 00:12:50,600 Speaker 5: Well, this is only my third day here in Tokyo. 229 00:12:50,679 --> 00:12:53,080 Speaker 5: I have heard about that from more or less everybody 230 00:12:53,080 --> 00:12:55,640 Speaker 5: I've spoken to, so you can certainly see that that 231 00:12:56,520 --> 00:12:59,080 Speaker 5: is that, this is something that's happening. It's something that 232 00:12:59,160 --> 00:13:04,400 Speaker 5: was predictable. A lot of countries in this region have 233 00:13:04,480 --> 00:13:07,000 Speaker 5: a pretty strong need to stay friendly with China, and 234 00:13:07,000 --> 00:13:09,560 Speaker 5: they're unlikely to push back unless they really have to. 235 00:13:11,360 --> 00:13:16,640 Speaker 5: You do ultimately have the possibility of very serious negative 236 00:13:16,679 --> 00:13:20,240 Speaker 5: outcomes for the US eventually out of this. For the 237 00:13:20,280 --> 00:13:24,600 Speaker 5: time being, the critical factor which more or less ensures 238 00:13:24,640 --> 00:13:27,640 Speaker 5: that the US isn't going to do anything, isn't going 239 00:13:27,679 --> 00:13:30,800 Speaker 5: to change its posture, is that it's making a lot 240 00:13:30,800 --> 00:13:32,080 Speaker 5: of money out of it. If you look at the 241 00:13:32,080 --> 00:13:36,480 Speaker 5: revenues they've derived from tariffs, it's very impressive. It's getting 242 00:13:36,520 --> 00:13:38,280 Speaker 5: on for a quarter of what they get from personal 243 00:13:38,360 --> 00:13:45,320 Speaker 5: income tax already. That is difficult to forsake. It does 244 00:13:45,400 --> 00:13:48,440 Speaker 5: make all the physical problems in the US that much 245 00:13:48,559 --> 00:13:52,240 Speaker 5: easier to deal with. Of course, it means if you're 246 00:13:52,280 --> 00:13:55,200 Speaker 5: taking that much revenue, it means you haven't had the 247 00:13:55,240 --> 00:13:59,240 Speaker 5: desired effect of actually choking off imports, of protecting the 248 00:13:59,240 --> 00:14:02,400 Speaker 5: businesses that are but you are still making money. So 249 00:14:02,480 --> 00:14:07,080 Speaker 5: I suspect the US is locked into this path for 250 00:14:07,160 --> 00:14:11,000 Speaker 5: a while, and everybody else is going to do led 251 00:14:11,040 --> 00:14:13,840 Speaker 5: obviously by China by far the most powerful economy outside 252 00:14:13,840 --> 00:14:15,800 Speaker 5: of the US. Everybody else is going to do exactly 253 00:14:15,840 --> 00:14:17,400 Speaker 5: what you think they would do, which is find somebody 254 00:14:17,440 --> 00:14:18,600 Speaker 5: other than the US, the Celtic. 255 00:14:18,760 --> 00:14:22,520 Speaker 4: When it comes to revenues, it's tariffs, maybe also chip 256 00:14:22,560 --> 00:14:26,000 Speaker 4: revenues for the US, maybe each one the visas as 257 00:14:26,040 --> 00:14:29,080 Speaker 4: well to some extent. How much does all this help 258 00:14:29,120 --> 00:14:32,640 Speaker 4: to allay the concerns on the long end of the curve. 259 00:14:33,920 --> 00:14:40,640 Speaker 5: That's an interesting one. I guess it does help a little. Well, 260 00:14:41,240 --> 00:14:43,240 Speaker 5: you just need to look at the performance of the 261 00:14:43,240 --> 00:14:45,560 Speaker 5: long end of the curve in the last month or two. 262 00:14:45,640 --> 00:14:51,160 Speaker 5: The risk of a big jump beyond beyond five percent is, 263 00:14:51,760 --> 00:14:55,880 Speaker 5: you know, definitely looks much lower for the time being. Again, 264 00:14:55,960 --> 00:15:00,760 Speaker 5: a lot depends on exactly how companies and the economy 265 00:15:00,800 --> 00:15:06,480 Speaker 5: accommodates the tariffs. If you do see a renewed pick 266 00:15:06,560 --> 00:15:11,880 Speaker 5: up in inflation, that's going to make people very concerned. 267 00:15:12,000 --> 00:15:18,360 Speaker 5: If you see a successful push for much lower rates, 268 00:15:18,560 --> 00:15:23,480 Speaker 5: i e. If you see the treasury the government forcing 269 00:15:23,520 --> 00:15:27,200 Speaker 5: people to lend them at low rates, obviously they really 270 00:15:27,240 --> 00:15:30,480 Speaker 5: can have some degree of impact over the short short end, 271 00:15:30,600 --> 00:15:34,360 Speaker 5: and you would therefore expect the long end derise. So 272 00:15:35,080 --> 00:15:39,960 Speaker 5: in itself, yes, it definitely does alleviate the pressure on 273 00:15:40,000 --> 00:15:43,000 Speaker 5: the long end. And this is one of the big things. 274 00:15:43,040 --> 00:15:46,680 Speaker 5: You have to say, the Trump administration wanted a weaker dollar, 275 00:15:47,320 --> 00:15:51,640 Speaker 5: lower long bond yields, and cheaper oil, and it's getting 276 00:15:51,640 --> 00:15:55,440 Speaker 5: all of them, which for the time being, certainly explained 277 00:15:55,440 --> 00:15:57,320 Speaker 5: to the degree of confidence you have in the US 278 00:15:57,320 --> 00:15:59,200 Speaker 5: that they can continue doing what they're doing. 279 00:16:00,040 --> 00:16:02,840 Speaker 4: Thinking some of the boxers, So the Trump administration was 280 00:16:02,880 --> 00:16:06,520 Speaker 4: in terms of market reaction. What about when it comes 281 00:16:06,560 --> 00:16:09,440 Speaker 4: to investment pledges. I mean, we're here in Japan. Yes, 282 00:16:10,360 --> 00:16:14,520 Speaker 4: you know, hundreds of billion dollars worth from both Japan 283 00:16:14,560 --> 00:16:17,800 Speaker 4: and South Korea that are being askedful but light on details. 284 00:16:18,080 --> 00:16:22,040 Speaker 4: We had the immigration rates in the US and South 285 00:16:22,080 --> 00:16:27,200 Speaker 4: Korean factories. I mean, how realistic are you expecting these 286 00:16:27,240 --> 00:16:28,360 Speaker 4: pledges to come in? 287 00:16:28,840 --> 00:16:33,600 Speaker 5: I'm not really. I mean, this is the thing about 288 00:16:33,680 --> 00:16:36,680 Speaker 5: any trade deal like this, they you know, the World 289 00:16:36,720 --> 00:16:40,800 Speaker 5: Trade Organization deals with you know, they had two year 290 00:16:40,880 --> 00:16:44,720 Speaker 5: cycles between the major WTO meetings because that's how long 291 00:16:44,760 --> 00:16:47,920 Speaker 5: it takes to thresh out the details of a of 292 00:16:47,960 --> 00:16:50,800 Speaker 5: a real trade deal with all the definitions that are involved. 293 00:16:53,480 --> 00:16:56,040 Speaker 5: I think the last I heard in video still don't 294 00:16:56,040 --> 00:16:58,640 Speaker 5: know the details of exactly what revenue they're going to 295 00:16:58,680 --> 00:17:01,240 Speaker 5: be coughing over to the s for example, and that's 296 00:17:01,240 --> 00:17:05,040 Speaker 5: the biggest, most powerful company in the US doesn't still 297 00:17:05,040 --> 00:17:07,320 Speaker 5: doesn't know exactly what the deal is with its own government. 298 00:17:10,640 --> 00:17:14,040 Speaker 5: The Japanese and Korean governments don't need my advice. I wouldn't. 299 00:17:14,040 --> 00:17:16,440 Speaker 5: I wouldn't be reckoning on I wouldn't be relying on 300 00:17:16,560 --> 00:17:20,439 Speaker 5: any deal like that, and I would definitely be continuing 301 00:17:20,880 --> 00:17:23,080 Speaker 5: if I were then with plan B of working out 302 00:17:23,080 --> 00:17:26,040 Speaker 5: a way of surviving without doing so much business with 303 00:17:26,080 --> 00:17:30,240 Speaker 5: the US. You mentioned H one BBS again it's early 304 00:17:30,359 --> 00:17:33,160 Speaker 5: days in the response, but my impression at the moment 305 00:17:33,240 --> 00:17:34,400 Speaker 5: is that if you're really going to have to pay 306 00:17:34,400 --> 00:17:37,320 Speaker 5: one hundred thousand dollars to bring somebody over to do 307 00:17:38,040 --> 00:17:41,560 Speaker 5: skilled work in the States, that will work from the 308 00:17:41,560 --> 00:17:45,320 Speaker 5: point of view of helping US workers. It won't raise 309 00:17:45,359 --> 00:17:47,600 Speaker 5: them any revenue. It just means that a lot of 310 00:17:47,600 --> 00:17:50,639 Speaker 5: people are going to have to find ways to deploy 311 00:17:50,680 --> 00:17:51,960 Speaker 5: themselves in their home countries. 312 00:17:53,119 --> 00:17:55,200 Speaker 4: Companies and workers are going to be doing that cost 313 00:17:55,240 --> 00:17:57,400 Speaker 4: benefit analysis as we go as well. 314 00:17:57,480 --> 00:17:59,200 Speaker 5: I mean, it could be perversely good for the likes 315 00:17:59,200 --> 00:18:02,240 Speaker 5: of India and China, but it's certainly a mess in 316 00:18:02,280 --> 00:18:04,760 Speaker 5: the in the in the foreseeable future. 317 00:18:05,280 --> 00:18:07,720 Speaker 4: John has been really great to chat with you. Thanks 318 00:18:07,720 --> 00:18:10,159 Speaker 4: so much for insights. I've senior editor for Markets and 319 00:18:10,240 --> 00:18:13,480 Speaker 4: Bloomberg Opinion columnist John Osis. 320 00:18:15,080 --> 00:18:18,440 Speaker 2: Thanks for listening to today's episode of the Bloomberg Daybreak 321 00:18:18,600 --> 00:18:22,000 Speaker 2: Asia Edition podcast. Each weekday, we look at the story 322 00:18:22,080 --> 00:18:26,399 Speaker 2: shaping markets, finance, and geopolitics in the Asia Pacific. You 323 00:18:26,440 --> 00:18:30,560 Speaker 2: can find us on Apple, Spotify, the Bloomberg Podcast YouTube channel, 324 00:18:30,680 --> 00:18:33,679 Speaker 2: or anywhere else you listen. Join us again tomorrow for 325 00:18:33,800 --> 00:18:37,320 Speaker 2: insight on the market moves from Hong Kong to Singapore 326 00:18:37,720 --> 00:18:41,480 Speaker 2: and Australia. I'm Doug Prisner, and this is Bloomberg