WEBVTT - SBF to Testify and Huawei Strikes Licensing Deal

0:00:16.440 --> 0:00:19.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm Caroline High and every World tad quarters in New York,

0:00:19.600 --> 0:00:22.080
<v Speaker 1>and I'm mad Ludlow in San Francisco. This is Bloomberg

0:00:22.079 --> 0:00:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Technology coming up in the next hour. Sam mag mun

0:00:24.920 --> 0:00:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Free says he's willing to testify before the U S.

0:00:28.000 --> 0:00:31.960
<v Speaker 1>House Financial Services Committee about the collapse of his crypto empire.

0:00:32.360 --> 0:00:35.840
<v Speaker 1>Will tell you what to expect from next week's hearing. Plus,

0:00:35.920 --> 0:00:39.760
<v Speaker 1>Huawei strikes a deal to license tech to a handset rival,

0:00:39.840 --> 0:00:42.440
<v Speaker 1>a bitter pill to swallow for the Chinese tech giant

0:00:42.479 --> 0:00:45.159
<v Speaker 1>that's blocked from selling its tech in the US. We

0:00:45.240 --> 0:00:48.120
<v Speaker 1>speak to two of their key executives, and we continue

0:00:48.159 --> 0:00:51.920
<v Speaker 1>our coverage of China's risk to dropping its COVID zero stance,

0:00:51.960 --> 0:00:56.440
<v Speaker 1>plus changes to Tessa Shanghai factory amid slowing consumer demand.

0:00:56.800 --> 0:01:00.040
<v Speaker 1>We have you covered first, though foremost it is the

0:01:00.200 --> 0:01:02.560
<v Speaker 1>markets day for us. Of course, we are once again

0:01:02.640 --> 0:01:05.240
<v Speaker 1>seeing the wind taken out of the sales of equities.

0:01:05.440 --> 0:01:08.320
<v Speaker 1>We're seeing down three quarters of a percent, so exhausting

0:01:08.400 --> 0:01:11.200
<v Speaker 1>that this camera is getting all over excited by what's

0:01:11.200 --> 0:01:14.319
<v Speaker 1>happening in these markets. Come closer, no back off. We're

0:01:14.360 --> 0:01:16.480
<v Speaker 1>having a look at the nastack off by seven tenths percent.

0:01:16.520 --> 0:01:19.839
<v Speaker 1>Look these basically, these benchmarks are off by at least

0:01:19.880 --> 0:01:22.200
<v Speaker 1>three and a half four percent on the week overall ed,

0:01:22.200 --> 0:01:24.400
<v Speaker 1>and this in large part is because we're worrying about

0:01:24.400 --> 0:01:27.039
<v Speaker 1>where the Federal Reserve is going and concerned, for example,

0:01:27.080 --> 0:01:29.039
<v Speaker 1>about how far they have to hike, when we're seeing

0:01:29.040 --> 0:01:32.959
<v Speaker 1>a PPIP producer price index that shows that prices are

0:01:33.000 --> 0:01:36.640
<v Speaker 1>just showing such resilience, inflation showing such resilience in the

0:01:36.680 --> 0:01:39.039
<v Speaker 1>face of what have been rapid rate hikes by the Fed.

0:01:39.240 --> 0:01:42.119
<v Speaker 1>Ten year yields have been climbing almost ten basis points.

0:01:42.240 --> 0:01:44.559
<v Speaker 1>Let's have a look at what's happening overall in terms

0:01:44.560 --> 0:01:47.680
<v Speaker 1>of our recession risks. As we are anticipating the warrior

0:01:47.680 --> 0:01:50.240
<v Speaker 1>about a recession, we are seeing the entire market just

0:01:50.280 --> 0:01:51.920
<v Speaker 1>getting nervous. If we can flip up the board, we

0:01:52.000 --> 0:01:54.640
<v Speaker 1>really got this chart that has evidence of where we've

0:01:54.680 --> 0:01:58.360
<v Speaker 1>been going in terms of the pickup now sixty chance. Basically,

0:01:58.400 --> 0:02:00.280
<v Speaker 1>the market sees there will be in a recept so

0:02:00.320 --> 0:02:03.000
<v Speaker 1>a contraction in this economy in the US come next year.

0:02:03.280 --> 0:02:05.800
<v Speaker 1>And we've just got to keep talking about this contagion effect,

0:02:05.920 --> 0:02:09.040
<v Speaker 1>keep talking about what happens next week, what clarity. We

0:02:09.080 --> 0:02:10.600
<v Speaker 1>get it for any because we know that the former

0:02:10.639 --> 0:02:13.799
<v Speaker 1>ft X CEO ed Sam bankmin Freed, says he is

0:02:13.840 --> 0:02:15.839
<v Speaker 1>actually willing to testify. How did he tell us? Of course,

0:02:15.840 --> 0:02:17.640
<v Speaker 1>he told us through Twitter. He announced it in a

0:02:17.720 --> 0:02:20.639
<v Speaker 1>series of tweets, in fact, saying he will answer questions

0:02:20.680 --> 0:02:23.080
<v Speaker 1>about the fall of his crypto empire from the U S.

0:02:23.080 --> 0:02:27.359
<v Speaker 1>House Financial Service eximmity. Let's bring in Alison Verstraw from Washington,

0:02:27.440 --> 0:02:29.560
<v Speaker 1>who has been all across this story, and of course

0:02:29.600 --> 0:02:31.919
<v Speaker 1>so too has our own Shinali Bassett, who of course

0:02:31.919 --> 0:02:34.480
<v Speaker 1>we'll be heading out to Washington and to that hearing

0:02:34.520 --> 0:02:37.520
<v Speaker 1>next week. And Alison, just what did you make of

0:02:37.560 --> 0:02:40.160
<v Speaker 1>the transparency we're getting them through the former Twitter. How

0:02:40.160 --> 0:02:43.360
<v Speaker 1>are we seeing the actual senators trying to speak to

0:02:43.480 --> 0:02:47.320
<v Speaker 1>Sam bankma Freed himself. You know, we're seeing everyone is

0:02:47.400 --> 0:02:50.960
<v Speaker 1>using Twitter. We see Maxine Waters from the House Financial

0:02:51.000 --> 0:02:55.359
<v Speaker 1>Services Committee is increasingly used that to put pressure on

0:02:55.560 --> 0:03:00.440
<v Speaker 1>Sam to testify. We've also seen Senator to Me came

0:03:00.440 --> 0:03:03.200
<v Speaker 1>out with his own tweet today that said, Sam, if

0:03:03.200 --> 0:03:04.880
<v Speaker 1>you do show up at the House Committee is hearing,

0:03:04.919 --> 0:03:07.440
<v Speaker 1>you better show up? But are hearing the next day?

0:03:07.560 --> 0:03:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Uh so, you know everyone's using social media. It's kind

0:03:12.120 --> 0:03:14.639
<v Speaker 1>of painful. I mean, I think was it Czi put

0:03:14.680 --> 0:03:17.040
<v Speaker 1>invest himself is like because like, no, I can't watch movies.

0:03:17.080 --> 0:03:19.519
<v Speaker 1>They're not exciting enough. I'm just addicted to crypto Twitter.

0:03:19.560 --> 0:03:22.040
<v Speaker 1>And aren't we all in? Sali Bassaka is Mickey among them?

0:03:22.400 --> 0:03:24.840
<v Speaker 1>Just talk to us about not only what you're going

0:03:24.880 --> 0:03:26.359
<v Speaker 1>to be following through Twitter, but or you're gonna be

0:03:26.360 --> 0:03:28.560
<v Speaker 1>following Shali on the ground because you're going to be there,

0:03:28.560 --> 0:03:31.000
<v Speaker 1>you're going to be expecting testimony from who and all

0:03:31.000 --> 0:03:33.200
<v Speaker 1>think the right kind of people to be giving testimony. Uh,

0:03:33.560 --> 0:03:35.320
<v Speaker 1>that's an interesting question because there are a lot of

0:03:35.360 --> 0:03:37.240
<v Speaker 1>academics that are being called upon the House and the

0:03:37.280 --> 0:03:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Senate hearings. Remember there's only one set of small witnesses

0:03:40.240 --> 0:03:42.800
<v Speaker 1>posted on the Senate Commody side. We don't have everything

0:03:42.840 --> 0:03:44.880
<v Speaker 1>from the House itself at all yet. And remember Sam

0:03:45.360 --> 0:03:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Freed said he's willing to testify. Will he show up

0:03:48.280 --> 0:03:51.200
<v Speaker 1>and testify? There was no subpoena up to all this

0:03:51.280 --> 0:03:53.400
<v Speaker 1>point as well, so a lot of questions about whether

0:03:53.400 --> 0:03:55.800
<v Speaker 1>he will be there in person. Remember he does say

0:03:55.840 --> 0:03:58.040
<v Speaker 1>that what he is trying to do is address not

0:03:58.160 --> 0:04:00.120
<v Speaker 1>only f t X and the pathway to which term

0:04:00.200 --> 0:04:02.560
<v Speaker 1>value to shareholders, but also it led to the crash.

0:04:02.560 --> 0:04:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Will be looking at what he says versus what he

0:04:04.800 --> 0:04:07.640
<v Speaker 1>has said before, as well as he says his own failings.

0:04:07.840 --> 0:04:09.880
<v Speaker 1>He also said he doesn't have access to much of

0:04:09.920 --> 0:04:12.240
<v Speaker 1>his own data, personal or professional, so you have to

0:04:12.280 --> 0:04:14.840
<v Speaker 1>wonder why he doesn't have that access and what kind

0:04:14.880 --> 0:04:17.880
<v Speaker 1>of data he will not be able to allegedly provide

0:04:17.880 --> 0:04:20.960
<v Speaker 1>to the lawmakers as they question him if he makes

0:04:21.000 --> 0:04:23.080
<v Speaker 1>it there to the Hill next week, so again the

0:04:23.120 --> 0:04:27.240
<v Speaker 1>House on Tuesday, the Senate on Wednesday, and remember the

0:04:27.279 --> 0:04:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Senators have also been seeking to try to get them

0:04:29.839 --> 0:04:32.640
<v Speaker 1>there as well, but they did not reply to them

0:04:32.680 --> 0:04:35.800
<v Speaker 1>in time for the testimony so far. So logistically, let's

0:04:35.800 --> 0:04:38.839
<v Speaker 1>see if he makes it to both. Team Shannali has

0:04:38.880 --> 0:04:40.680
<v Speaker 1>just gone to the exact point I want to bring up.

0:04:40.680 --> 0:04:43.560
<v Speaker 1>In fact, super Producers, let's bring his tweet back up

0:04:43.600 --> 0:04:46.000
<v Speaker 1>again and look at what he said, because what I'm

0:04:46.000 --> 0:04:49.880
<v Speaker 1>not understanding, Allison, is what would we learn from SPF

0:04:50.640 --> 0:04:55.119
<v Speaker 1>on Capitol Hill that we haven't already learned in the many, many, many,

0:04:55.200 --> 0:05:00.479
<v Speaker 1>many many appearances and communications that he's made the last

0:05:00.520 --> 0:05:05.919
<v Speaker 1>seven to ten days. That's a great question, and I honestly,

0:05:06.040 --> 0:05:08.040
<v Speaker 1>I feel like we're probably gonna hear a lot of

0:05:08.080 --> 0:05:11.760
<v Speaker 1>the same things. You know. Uh, he'll say that he

0:05:11.800 --> 0:05:14.760
<v Speaker 1>didn't intentionally need to commit any sort of fraud. He'll

0:05:14.760 --> 0:05:17.240
<v Speaker 1>probably talk about the fact that maybe he made some

0:05:17.320 --> 0:05:21.839
<v Speaker 1>managerial mistakes. UM So I'm sort of expecting it to

0:05:21.839 --> 0:05:25.320
<v Speaker 1>be along the same Lise. I'm actually maybe more interested

0:05:25.520 --> 0:05:28.120
<v Speaker 1>in hearing the testimony of John J. Ray, who is

0:05:28.160 --> 0:05:31.640
<v Speaker 1>the furren CEO kind of helping with the restructuring of FTX.

0:05:32.160 --> 0:05:35.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, he has access to all of this data.

0:05:35.160 --> 0:05:37.360
<v Speaker 1>He's sifting through these records. Though he's told this up

0:05:37.520 --> 0:05:40.760
<v Speaker 1>they're not very good. Um So, you know, I'm hoping

0:05:40.800 --> 0:05:43.440
<v Speaker 1>that maybe we get some some extra details from what

0:05:43.480 --> 0:05:47.320
<v Speaker 1>we've seen in the bank from seed filing so far. Actually, Shnali,

0:05:47.760 --> 0:05:51.560
<v Speaker 1>new headlines actually continue to come through about this story.

0:05:51.600 --> 0:05:54.120
<v Speaker 1>I saw a tweet or thread of tweets from the

0:05:54.240 --> 0:05:57.320
<v Speaker 1>editor at large of the block. Could you tell us

0:05:57.360 --> 0:05:59.719
<v Speaker 1>what the story is there? Please? Yeah, you are referring

0:05:59.760 --> 0:06:03.120
<v Speaker 1>to the tweet thread by Frank Tapparo, otherwise known as

0:06:03.120 --> 0:06:07.080
<v Speaker 1>syntech Frank, who four days ago released an almost two

0:06:07.200 --> 0:06:11.520
<v Speaker 1>hour podcast speaking with f SVF about what had happened here.

0:06:11.560 --> 0:06:13.800
<v Speaker 1>But really what had happened is he said he did

0:06:13.800 --> 0:06:17.120
<v Speaker 1>not know, and many employees at the Block did not

0:06:17.200 --> 0:06:20.760
<v Speaker 1>know and felt really UH put in a dark here

0:06:20.920 --> 0:06:23.640
<v Speaker 1>because what happened was an executive, the CEO of the Block,

0:06:23.640 --> 0:06:26.520
<v Speaker 1>which is supposed to be an independent news site related

0:06:26.560 --> 0:06:29.919
<v Speaker 1>to crypto, that was bought out by management about a

0:06:29.960 --> 0:06:32.640
<v Speaker 1>year or so ago. Yeah, absolutely, gotta look at that

0:06:32.640 --> 0:06:35.280
<v Speaker 1>tweet right there. So what they are finding out now

0:06:35.440 --> 0:06:39.200
<v Speaker 1>is that CEO had taken personal loans through UH, a

0:06:39.640 --> 0:06:43.679
<v Speaker 1>entity here that did not disclose that SPF had given

0:06:43.720 --> 0:06:46.800
<v Speaker 1>loans to the CEO that ended up being part of

0:06:46.800 --> 0:06:50.200
<v Speaker 1>what helped that executive lead to the buyout. So listen,

0:06:50.240 --> 0:06:53.240
<v Speaker 1>the CEO has stepped down. You are seeing the employees

0:06:53.279 --> 0:06:56.120
<v Speaker 1>really from this, they are saying they did not know

0:06:56.240 --> 0:06:58.520
<v Speaker 1>at all. This was really found out within the past

0:06:58.560 --> 0:07:01.000
<v Speaker 1>couple of days, and as I was saying, just two

0:07:01.080 --> 0:07:05.200
<v Speaker 1>days ago, they had interviewed SPF himself. And it can,

0:07:05.240 --> 0:07:07.839
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it can seem like inside baseball when journalists

0:07:07.839 --> 0:07:10.920
<v Speaker 1>are talking about other journalists. But your heart does have

0:07:10.960 --> 0:07:13.160
<v Speaker 1>to go out to people who feel completely undone, not

0:07:13.240 --> 0:07:16.240
<v Speaker 1>only by their sector collapsing the industry that they've grown

0:07:16.240 --> 0:07:19.400
<v Speaker 1>to love collapsing, but then their own CEO seemingly catching

0:07:19.440 --> 0:07:21.960
<v Speaker 1>them completely off guard and blindsiding them. I'm sure there's

0:07:21.960 --> 0:07:26.240
<v Speaker 1>more to come from that, but overall, Allison, the transparency

0:07:26.240 --> 0:07:29.160
<v Speaker 1>we're going to get from a regulatory perspective, from a

0:07:29.280 --> 0:07:32.040
<v Speaker 1>lawmaker's perspective, and I asked it to Scenalia earlier. I

0:07:32.040 --> 0:07:34.080
<v Speaker 1>asked it to you now, the people that they're going

0:07:34.120 --> 0:07:36.920
<v Speaker 1>to have in front of them giving evidence. I've seen

0:07:37.000 --> 0:07:40.080
<v Speaker 1>some talk on Twitter again that people who feel very

0:07:40.120 --> 0:07:42.440
<v Speaker 1>legitimate in this space haven't been asked, and some people

0:07:42.440 --> 0:07:45.000
<v Speaker 1>who have been asked to speak, perhaps on deemed so

0:07:45.120 --> 0:07:48.360
<v Speaker 1>legitimate just talked us about who we expect to hear from.

0:07:48.560 --> 0:07:51.040
<v Speaker 1>So on the health side of the only person that's

0:07:51.080 --> 0:07:53.520
<v Speaker 1>actually listed as a witness so far is John J.

0:07:53.720 --> 0:07:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Ray So, the current CEO of FTX. On the Senate side,

0:07:58.440 --> 0:08:01.280
<v Speaker 1>we have a pretty smart list as well. One of

0:08:01.320 --> 0:08:04.520
<v Speaker 1>them is a law professor who specializes in sort of

0:08:04.520 --> 0:08:08.800
<v Speaker 1>financial regulation and in technologies. And then the other one

0:08:09.080 --> 0:08:11.920
<v Speaker 1>is Ben mackenzie. So if you want the o C,

0:08:13.040 --> 0:08:15.360
<v Speaker 1>then you would recognize that name. He was Ryan on

0:08:15.440 --> 0:08:18.480
<v Speaker 1>the f C. He's more recently come out as a

0:08:18.560 --> 0:08:23.960
<v Speaker 1>very anti crypto skeptic and sort of crypto commentator. But

0:08:24.040 --> 0:08:26.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people were a little surprised to see

0:08:26.120 --> 0:08:30.880
<v Speaker 1>that name on the list. T Mosey. I think we

0:08:30.960 --> 0:08:34.560
<v Speaker 1>all better get some rest this weekend next week, said

0:08:34.600 --> 0:08:38.320
<v Speaker 1>crypto nervous sleep. Thank goodness that I do sleep Friday

0:08:38.400 --> 0:08:40.920
<v Speaker 1>night through Sunday night. All right, bloombergs Allison Verse Brow

0:08:40.920 --> 0:08:45.400
<v Speaker 1>and Shnali Bassek, thank you both. Coming up, Huawei expands

0:08:45.440 --> 0:08:48.600
<v Speaker 1>on the patent monetizing game. We'll discuss that and much

0:08:48.640 --> 0:08:52.719
<v Speaker 1>more with top executives from the company. Next, this is Bloomberg.

0:09:01.160 --> 0:09:03.760
<v Speaker 1>We wouldn't talk about. Another key story, particularly from a

0:09:03.800 --> 0:09:07.240
<v Speaker 1>genio political perspective, Huawei Technologies has agreed to license some

0:09:07.320 --> 0:09:10.760
<v Speaker 1>of its smartphone technologies well to an old rival called Opo.

0:09:11.160 --> 0:09:13.520
<v Speaker 1>One of China's top smartphone brands now, Hwei is one

0:09:13.520 --> 0:09:15.640
<v Speaker 1>of the biggest holders of five G patterns and many

0:09:15.640 --> 0:09:19.000
<v Speaker 1>patterns in fact, and it's historically not been that aggressive

0:09:19.000 --> 0:09:22.640
<v Speaker 1>in monetizing those patterns. But the telecom giant now seeing

0:09:22.679 --> 0:09:25.600
<v Speaker 1>itself perhaps in a need to look in revenues and

0:09:25.600 --> 0:09:28.640
<v Speaker 1>other areas after it's a lucrative handset business was hit

0:09:28.679 --> 0:09:31.440
<v Speaker 1>pretty hard by US trade sanctions that cut it off

0:09:31.679 --> 0:09:34.320
<v Speaker 1>in terms of access to advanced chips. I'm very pleased

0:09:34.320 --> 0:09:37.200
<v Speaker 1>to welcome, therefore to the show Huawei chief security Officer

0:09:37.360 --> 0:09:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Andy Purdy, alongside Huawei's Chief Intellectual Property counsel for the

0:09:40.880 --> 0:09:44.200
<v Speaker 1>United States, Stephen Geisler. Thank you very much, indeed, gentlemen,

0:09:44.200 --> 0:09:48.000
<v Speaker 1>for both being here. And let's start first and foremost

0:09:48.800 --> 0:09:52.080
<v Speaker 1>where we're thinking about the new areas of revenue. And

0:09:52.120 --> 0:09:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Steve and I address this question to you because how

0:09:54.880 --> 0:09:57.720
<v Speaker 1>important now is the monetization of patterns. How are you

0:09:57.760 --> 0:10:00.800
<v Speaker 1>seeing this driving in terms of percentage wise of revenue

0:10:00.840 --> 0:10:05.439
<v Speaker 1>going forward? So are the revenue we will we will

0:10:05.520 --> 0:10:08.439
<v Speaker 1>realize through patent licensing is not going to make up

0:10:08.520 --> 0:10:11.920
<v Speaker 1>for or be in lieu of products sales UH in

0:10:11.960 --> 0:10:14.240
<v Speaker 1>any given year. We're talking about numbers that are in

0:10:14.280 --> 0:10:18.000
<v Speaker 1>the hundreds of millions versus products sales, products and services

0:10:18.080 --> 0:10:22.080
<v Speaker 1>combined being in tens of billions of US dollars. So

0:10:22.200 --> 0:10:24.800
<v Speaker 1>certainly one is not going to be a replacement for

0:10:24.840 --> 0:10:27.720
<v Speaker 1>the other. We are simply trying to make sure that

0:10:28.320 --> 0:10:30.640
<v Speaker 1>based upon the money we've spent through the years on

0:10:30.800 --> 0:10:33.760
<v Speaker 1>R and D and then patenting that we're getting a

0:10:34.040 --> 0:10:38.480
<v Speaker 1>fair return on our our patent expenditures for patenting our

0:10:38.520 --> 0:10:43.120
<v Speaker 1>technologies and also using the patents to reach agreements with

0:10:43.160 --> 0:10:47.120
<v Speaker 1>our competitors and peers to make sure that the innovation

0:10:47.120 --> 0:10:49.480
<v Speaker 1>that goes into global standards such as four G and

0:10:49.520 --> 0:10:53.720
<v Speaker 1>five G telephony, for WiFi, for the audio video codex

0:10:53.760 --> 0:10:56.400
<v Speaker 1>that allow for streaming for for your viewers to watch

0:10:56.440 --> 0:11:00.760
<v Speaker 1>even today's show, that that is recuperated by not only

0:11:00.840 --> 0:11:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Huawei but other large members of the ICT industry for

0:11:06.720 --> 0:11:09.640
<v Speaker 1>what we spend on R and D. I want to

0:11:09.640 --> 0:11:14.559
<v Speaker 1>bring Andy Purdy, Huawei's chief security officer, into the conversation. Andy,

0:11:15.160 --> 0:11:18.079
<v Speaker 1>how much for a bitter pill to swallow? Is this? Huawei?

0:11:18.120 --> 0:11:22.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, you once had a significant handset business that

0:11:22.760 --> 0:11:27.480
<v Speaker 1>was a driver of revenue growth but also just accounted

0:11:27.520 --> 0:11:31.480
<v Speaker 1>for a big chunk of revenue. Now you are pivoting

0:11:32.000 --> 0:11:37.160
<v Speaker 1>essentially again, is it a bitter pill to swallow? We

0:11:37.280 --> 0:11:39.920
<v Speaker 1>deal with reality, and the reality is that we have

0:11:40.040 --> 0:11:44.360
<v Speaker 1>certain challenges. Our survival is first and foremost. Our ability

0:11:44.360 --> 0:11:47.240
<v Speaker 1>to work with partners and customers to innovate and bring

0:11:47.320 --> 0:11:49.880
<v Speaker 1>five G enabled technologies to the world is what we're about.

0:11:49.880 --> 0:11:52.600
<v Speaker 1>To help bring connectivity to the world. And so that's

0:11:52.600 --> 0:11:55.240
<v Speaker 1>where we look at. We've got tremendous opportunities out there.

0:11:55.600 --> 0:11:59.079
<v Speaker 1>The regiment, the international regime that was just talking about

0:11:59.440 --> 0:12:02.360
<v Speaker 1>the idea that there are certain standards and certain companies

0:12:02.360 --> 0:12:05.360
<v Speaker 1>may own patents relative that standards is the international system

0:12:05.360 --> 0:12:08.880
<v Speaker 1>of making sure there's fairness that competitors can buy licenses

0:12:08.920 --> 0:12:12.640
<v Speaker 1>from other competitors is a huge thing on the international stage.

0:12:12.840 --> 0:12:16.680
<v Speaker 1>They help increase innovation and increase competition around the World's

0:12:16.720 --> 0:12:18.520
<v Speaker 1>a it's a great tribute to hell well at Global

0:12:18.800 --> 0:12:22.559
<v Speaker 1>system Works in the I P area. Andy though those words,

0:12:22.600 --> 0:12:27.640
<v Speaker 1>it's about survival. Just how threatened has your business model

0:12:27.679 --> 0:12:32.560
<v Speaker 1>become through US China attentions and how non ending do

0:12:32.600 --> 0:12:35.120
<v Speaker 1>you think that this shutdown will be? This access to

0:12:35.120 --> 0:12:38.760
<v Speaker 1>the United States, this ability to sell into it. Well,

0:12:38.840 --> 0:12:43.240
<v Speaker 1>when you look at our revenues from our revenue is

0:12:43.280 --> 0:12:47.480
<v Speaker 1>dropped about thirty billion dollars, mostly because of our inability

0:12:47.559 --> 0:12:51.000
<v Speaker 1>to to buy ships for our five G phones. And

0:12:51.080 --> 0:12:55.680
<v Speaker 1>so we are emphasizing tremendous investment of this past year

0:12:56.160 --> 0:12:58.880
<v Speaker 1>in R and D or twenty billion dollars in R

0:12:58.880 --> 0:13:02.280
<v Speaker 1>and D and thousands of partnerships to help RAN five

0:13:02.800 --> 0:13:06.560
<v Speaker 1>digital transformation, the different industries such as smart mining and

0:13:06.600 --> 0:13:10.000
<v Speaker 1>smart courts, and the ability to create safer environments and

0:13:10.120 --> 0:13:14.520
<v Speaker 1>reduce sandergy consumption. And basically we are finding our way

0:13:14.559 --> 0:13:18.040
<v Speaker 1>on the road. And we're even doing hardcore scientific research

0:13:18.400 --> 0:13:20.920
<v Speaker 1>on things like wars law and Shannon's limits so that

0:13:21.240 --> 0:13:25.160
<v Speaker 1>the scientific challenges of five G, five point five G

0:13:25.280 --> 0:13:27.319
<v Speaker 1>and six G can be overcome for the benefit of

0:13:27.360 --> 0:13:29.600
<v Speaker 1>the world. So we take the world as we see

0:13:29.600 --> 0:13:31.959
<v Speaker 1>it and we're working hard and innovating. I think we

0:13:32.040 --> 0:13:34.559
<v Speaker 1>had while we're really proud of how we're moving forward

0:13:34.600 --> 0:13:38.560
<v Speaker 1>with partners around the world. Stephen, you're the US Chief

0:13:39.080 --> 0:13:43.840
<v Speaker 1>Intellectual Property Council, although it is still a Chinese maker

0:13:43.920 --> 0:13:46.559
<v Speaker 1>of handsets, cause you took us through how the deal

0:13:46.640 --> 0:13:49.760
<v Speaker 1>came about and how difficult the deal was to get done.

0:13:51.320 --> 0:13:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Certainly the deal was done through bilateral negotiations without the

0:13:57.000 --> 0:14:01.320
<v Speaker 1>need for litigation. That's important because times these deals are

0:14:01.400 --> 0:14:05.880
<v Speaker 1>are only brought about through litigation because we need the

0:14:06.040 --> 0:14:08.880
<v Speaker 1>intervention of courts to help decide things such as what

0:14:09.000 --> 0:14:11.920
<v Speaker 1>is the proper rate and what products are are should

0:14:11.920 --> 0:14:15.040
<v Speaker 1>be subject to a license agreement? Here that was not necessary.

0:14:15.960 --> 0:14:19.000
<v Speaker 1>We also view that this is a key step forward. Um,

0:14:19.040 --> 0:14:22.040
<v Speaker 1>it's not our first Chinese cross license by any means

0:14:22.120 --> 0:14:25.360
<v Speaker 1>or as it oppos but it is a major sign

0:14:25.640 --> 0:14:30.720
<v Speaker 1>that the Chinese regime for patent protection it continues to mature.

0:14:31.160 --> 0:14:35.880
<v Speaker 1>These are are two large competitors, UH bringing about a

0:14:36.440 --> 0:14:41.080
<v Speaker 1>very important agreement between the two of us. Andy. I

0:14:41.120 --> 0:14:45.040
<v Speaker 1>asked you earlier if having to license your tech rather

0:14:45.080 --> 0:14:48.440
<v Speaker 1>than selling handsets is a bit of pill to swallow,

0:14:48.480 --> 0:14:51.720
<v Speaker 1>and you said, it's the reality where we are. Now.

0:14:52.520 --> 0:14:55.960
<v Speaker 1>What is the reality of Huawei being able to sell

0:14:56.560 --> 0:14:59.480
<v Speaker 1>not just handsets in terms of smartphones, but are the

0:14:59.520 --> 0:15:03.600
<v Speaker 1>hard into the United States directly? When how does that

0:15:03.640 --> 0:15:09.920
<v Speaker 1>come about? Our emphasis for the foreseeable future is in

0:15:10.000 --> 0:15:12.840
<v Speaker 1>those parts of the world, and there are many that

0:15:12.880 --> 0:15:16.440
<v Speaker 1>are open to working with us, helping open the partnering

0:15:16.480 --> 0:15:19.280
<v Speaker 1>from us, and so they're tremendous opportunities around the world,

0:15:19.280 --> 0:15:21.680
<v Speaker 1>and so that's what we're focusing on right now, and frankly,

0:15:21.720 --> 0:15:23.600
<v Speaker 1>as those of us in the United States, and we

0:15:23.680 --> 0:15:25.440
<v Speaker 1>look at some of the things we're doing around the

0:15:25.480 --> 0:15:28.640
<v Speaker 1>world to help bring connectivity to the under connected, we

0:15:28.760 --> 0:15:31.120
<v Speaker 1>hope that in the United States there can be a

0:15:31.160 --> 0:15:34.840
<v Speaker 1>little more action and a little less talk about connecting

0:15:35.000 --> 0:15:38.160
<v Speaker 1>the rural America in a resilient way and frankly, helping

0:15:38.200 --> 0:15:41.240
<v Speaker 1>you connect and have appropriate devices for distressed communities or

0:15:41.320 --> 0:15:44.840
<v Speaker 1>communities in urban areas of the country. Americans really need

0:15:44.920 --> 0:15:50.800
<v Speaker 1>to get the benefit of connectivity overall. Is that argument Landing?

0:15:51.200 --> 0:15:54.240
<v Speaker 1>And who are you speaking to here in the United States?

0:15:54.320 --> 0:15:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Are people do they still want in any way to

0:15:57.040 --> 0:16:01.240
<v Speaker 1>grant access directly or indirectly for your technology they feel

0:16:01.240 --> 0:16:02.920
<v Speaker 1>the need for it, because I was amazed to see

0:16:02.960 --> 0:16:05.200
<v Speaker 1>just how many patterns you put into the United States,

0:16:05.200 --> 0:16:09.320
<v Speaker 1>for example, p a year like you're number one. M Well,

0:16:10.080 --> 0:16:12.320
<v Speaker 1>as I said, our focus is not to do business

0:16:12.360 --> 0:16:14.040
<v Speaker 1>in the United States, and as we talk about the

0:16:14.160 --> 0:16:17.160
<v Speaker 1>lessons we are learning and five G transformation around the

0:16:17.160 --> 0:16:19.720
<v Speaker 1>world is not to enable us in new business. We

0:16:19.760 --> 0:16:21.720
<v Speaker 1>think there are lessons that we're learning. We think there

0:16:21.720 --> 0:16:24.280
<v Speaker 1>are lessons as the United States can learn from success

0:16:24.280 --> 0:16:26.840
<v Speaker 1>stories and other parts of the world. But I mentioned

0:16:26.840 --> 0:16:29.960
<v Speaker 1>the smart mining and smart ports, But but healthcare and

0:16:30.000 --> 0:16:35.920
<v Speaker 1>manufacturing consistency, reducing energy consumption, and telecommunications. The United States

0:16:36.040 --> 0:16:38.000
<v Speaker 1>needs to step up and be much more active in

0:16:38.040 --> 0:16:40.240
<v Speaker 1>these things to help the competitiveness of the United States

0:16:40.280 --> 0:16:44.920
<v Speaker 1>and help the American people. I'm interested, Stephen, and I'm

0:16:44.920 --> 0:16:47.120
<v Speaker 1>wondering if you can take us in the money direction.

0:16:47.320 --> 0:16:51.640
<v Speaker 1>In your focus as Chief Intellectual Property Council, you are

0:16:51.800 --> 0:16:53.680
<v Speaker 1>not only just announcing, of course, to deal with oper

0:16:53.800 --> 0:16:55.760
<v Speaker 1>but you made public for the first time that you're

0:16:55.800 --> 0:17:00.120
<v Speaker 1>also doing licensing five G Samsung. How much with some

0:17:00.160 --> 0:17:02.400
<v Speaker 1>of these partners, particularly when it comes to Samsung, to Apple,

0:17:02.480 --> 0:17:05.000
<v Speaker 1>to the huge players in this space, how much you're

0:17:05.080 --> 0:17:08.040
<v Speaker 1>charging them in terms of patent use, and are you

0:17:08.160 --> 0:17:10.399
<v Speaker 1>thinking about royalties in a different way. You're going to

0:17:10.440 --> 0:17:14.920
<v Speaker 1>have to change the maths and be more aggressive. Well so, so, first,

0:17:15.320 --> 0:17:18.159
<v Speaker 1>we don't view ourselves as aggressive. We are certainly active

0:17:18.160 --> 0:17:21.840
<v Speaker 1>in the licensing space, uh where third parties have done

0:17:21.880 --> 0:17:25.760
<v Speaker 1>independent studies of our licensing, our rates for our patents

0:17:25.840 --> 0:17:29.080
<v Speaker 1>versus many of our competitors. We actually are much more

0:17:29.160 --> 0:17:30.879
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of the pack. So we are not

0:17:31.040 --> 0:17:35.000
<v Speaker 1>looking to set the highest rates in in any industry

0:17:35.280 --> 0:17:39.840
<v Speaker 1>or technology. Um. The importance of of U S patents,

0:17:39.840 --> 0:17:42.560
<v Speaker 1>for instance, which which you've mentioned previously, is still important

0:17:42.640 --> 0:17:44.879
<v Speaker 1>regardless of whether we ever sell a product again in

0:17:44.920 --> 0:17:49.280
<v Speaker 1>the United States. Our patents our technologies are being used

0:17:49.320 --> 0:17:53.159
<v Speaker 1>by US companies. Many of those companies have have freely

0:17:53.440 --> 0:17:57.480
<v Speaker 1>without litigation, have joined into license agreements with Whalwei to

0:17:57.600 --> 0:18:00.639
<v Speaker 1>pay for the rights to use our patent of technology

0:18:00.640 --> 0:18:03.080
<v Speaker 1>in the United States. No one in the United States

0:18:03.080 --> 0:18:06.800
<v Speaker 1>can use WiFi, particularly the new WiFi six which is

0:18:06.880 --> 0:18:11.040
<v Speaker 1>the the a X version without using Quawis technology. Same

0:18:11.080 --> 0:18:15.280
<v Speaker 1>things four genes five G. We are licensing car manufacturers

0:18:15.280 --> 0:18:17.920
<v Speaker 1>and their suppliers all around the world, from Japan to

0:18:18.080 --> 0:18:21.119
<v Speaker 1>China to the UK, to Germany to the United States

0:18:21.160 --> 0:18:24.720
<v Speaker 1>on their use of our four G technology in connected cars.

0:18:25.280 --> 0:18:29.040
<v Speaker 1>And so that is the important thing is making sure

0:18:29.040 --> 0:18:33.159
<v Speaker 1>people understand the difference between global use of standardized technology,

0:18:33.480 --> 0:18:36.960
<v Speaker 1>which which always a leader in in providing that technology,

0:18:37.480 --> 0:18:42.840
<v Speaker 1>versus product sales. Okay, Huawei chief Security Officer Andy Perdy

0:18:42.880 --> 0:18:45.719
<v Speaker 1>and Chief Intellectual Property Council for the U S Stephen

0:18:45.760 --> 0:18:49.159
<v Speaker 1>Guys that thank you both and concerns Linga that some

0:18:49.200 --> 0:18:52.240
<v Speaker 1>of the biggest Chinese tech firms will be delisted in

0:18:52.280 --> 0:18:55.200
<v Speaker 1>the US. As of Wednesday, about one of j D

0:18:55.400 --> 0:18:59.400
<v Speaker 1>dot com shaes was circulating in Hong Kong's settlement system.

0:18:59.440 --> 0:19:02.600
<v Speaker 1>This is in Vesta's move to convert them from US exchanges.

0:19:02.640 --> 0:19:05.840
<v Speaker 1>That's a near doubling from the end of according to

0:19:05.880 --> 0:19:10.159
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg calculation. Similarly, Ali Barber's Hong Kong listed share portion

0:19:10.280 --> 0:19:13.680
<v Speaker 1>rows eleven percentage points during the same period, a steady

0:19:13.720 --> 0:19:17.159
<v Speaker 1>shift into Asia, which shows traders are continuing to hedge

0:19:17.400 --> 0:19:21.520
<v Speaker 1>risks associated with the US China spat. Now coming up,

0:19:21.880 --> 0:19:26.159
<v Speaker 1>everyone's doing it? Are you? Lenser Ai? It's the latest

0:19:26.200 --> 0:19:28.080
<v Speaker 1>d ai application. You've got to take my word for it.

0:19:28.119 --> 0:19:32.720
<v Speaker 1>That makes yourselfies look even better? Caroline and I, well,

0:19:32.800 --> 0:19:34.359
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to give it too much away. Just

0:19:34.400 --> 0:19:49.680
<v Speaker 1>wait and see all that next. This is Bloomberg. So

0:19:50.080 --> 0:19:55.760
<v Speaker 1>that's us. That's Caroline right there, that's supposedly me using

0:19:55.800 --> 0:19:58.920
<v Speaker 1>the lenser Ai app and all in one image editing

0:19:58.920 --> 0:20:05.480
<v Speaker 1>app for your selfies. Don't yours are really good? You

0:20:05.560 --> 0:20:09.040
<v Speaker 1>look really hot, really smart? Even it does this remotely

0:20:09.080 --> 0:20:11.360
<v Speaker 1>look like me, not in the slightest. I'm kind of

0:20:11.800 --> 0:20:15.320
<v Speaker 1>a bit depressed that. I mean what I've just morphed

0:20:15.359 --> 0:20:19.520
<v Speaker 1>into sort of an artistic Italian gentlemen. I've morphed into

0:20:19.520 --> 0:20:22.160
<v Speaker 1>someone I really don't recognize, but they're kind of hot.

0:20:22.760 --> 0:20:24.720
<v Speaker 1>It was an interesting experience, like a lot of my

0:20:24.920 --> 0:20:29.840
<v Speaker 1>photos were rejected, but we're back the real you and I.

0:20:30.280 --> 0:20:33.640
<v Speaker 1>We just there's one photo where I look so unwell

0:20:33.720 --> 0:20:37.800
<v Speaker 1>and miserable and completely unlike myself that I was kind

0:20:37.800 --> 0:20:40.439
<v Speaker 1>of a bit a bit depressed by it, but probably,

0:20:40.480 --> 0:20:41.800
<v Speaker 1>as I kept saying, it sort of felt like my

0:20:41.880 --> 0:20:44.679
<v Speaker 1>insides after all the holiday parties. But I am interested

0:20:44.720 --> 0:20:47.840
<v Speaker 1>in that. Some people out there, right, one particular noted

0:20:47.840 --> 0:20:51.520
<v Speaker 1>economist thinks this sort of AI, particularly chat GPT for example,

0:20:51.880 --> 0:20:56.479
<v Speaker 1>is great strides in technology, right, I mean, is this

0:20:56.560 --> 0:20:58.760
<v Speaker 1>the best thing since sliced bread? Is this a game

0:20:58.840 --> 0:21:01.520
<v Speaker 1>change of revolutionary? As far as I can tell, it's

0:21:01.560 --> 0:21:04.000
<v Speaker 1>just strange pictures of you and I, but you got

0:21:04.119 --> 0:21:07.040
<v Speaker 1>to experience. Yeah, they've got to sew pll on it.

0:21:07.520 --> 0:21:10.359
<v Speaker 1>Larry Summers says this will change us in terms of

0:21:10.400 --> 0:21:14.200
<v Speaker 1>it's as important as the wheel and fire. Seemingly actually,

0:21:14.240 --> 0:21:26.680
<v Speaker 1>most think it is revolutionary. This is broom back. It's

0:21:26.720 --> 0:21:29.520
<v Speaker 1>not like there's an incredible amount of money that's ready

0:21:29.520 --> 0:21:32.280
<v Speaker 1>to be deployed. I think the pace of investments in

0:21:32.320 --> 0:21:34.840
<v Speaker 1>the venture ecosystem was masked a bit by capital that

0:21:34.920 --> 0:21:38.000
<v Speaker 1>was coming from non traditional ventures and corporate balance sheets

0:21:38.160 --> 0:21:40.199
<v Speaker 1>and so I think today what you're gonna see is

0:21:40.760 --> 0:21:44.399
<v Speaker 1>a shift, probably not in terms of opportunity sets, in

0:21:44.480 --> 0:21:47.080
<v Speaker 1>terms of how fast money gets deployed in the ecosystem,

0:21:47.200 --> 0:21:48.600
<v Speaker 1>but I think you're going to see people look for

0:21:48.680 --> 0:21:51.160
<v Speaker 1>complete different dynamics within the balance sheets and the capital

0:21:51.200 --> 0:21:55.080
<v Speaker 1>structures as the management team that they're investing in. That

0:21:55.240 --> 0:21:57.959
<v Speaker 1>was pitch Books Director of Research needs are To Whooney,

0:21:58.359 --> 0:22:01.000
<v Speaker 1>giving his take on the current dynamics at play in

0:22:01.000 --> 0:22:04.359
<v Speaker 1>the world of VC. It's because someone else's take. Denish A.

0:22:04.480 --> 0:22:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Kiers with us now general partner at Lux Capital, a

0:22:08.000 --> 0:22:12.000
<v Speaker 1>firm focusing on investments in emerging technologies. Four billion dollars

0:22:12.119 --> 0:22:16.199
<v Speaker 1>in assets under management. It's been a week. It's been

0:22:16.520 --> 0:22:20.320
<v Speaker 1>a big week for markets, for the world economics. Karen

0:22:20.320 --> 0:22:22.320
<v Speaker 1>and I have been talking a lot about data. You know,

0:22:22.400 --> 0:22:25.480
<v Speaker 1>there was various data sets, but the big takeaway is

0:22:25.520 --> 0:22:27.720
<v Speaker 1>that whether you do it on a volume basis, deal

0:22:27.760 --> 0:22:32.520
<v Speaker 1>count basis, dollar value basis, two is nothing compared to

0:22:33.320 --> 0:22:37.800
<v Speaker 1>one in your world. Why, well, it's great to be here,

0:22:37.840 --> 0:22:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for having me. I was expecting my lensa avatar

0:22:40.960 --> 0:22:43.440
<v Speaker 1>to show up instead of myself, but delighted to be here.

0:22:43.520 --> 0:22:46.719
<v Speaker 1>So no denying two was a roller coaster, and I

0:22:46.760 --> 0:22:49.760
<v Speaker 1>think we're still in for a long ride with ahead

0:22:49.760 --> 0:22:53.240
<v Speaker 1>of us. Many would say the exuberance of one needed

0:22:53.240 --> 0:22:55.240
<v Speaker 1>a correction, and that came with a bit of a

0:22:55.320 --> 0:22:59.320
<v Speaker 1>jarring surprise to some but also met the expectations of others.

0:22:59.320 --> 0:23:01.919
<v Speaker 1>It was, in anyway, is a long time coming. But

0:23:01.960 --> 0:23:04.520
<v Speaker 1>I still think we're just at the precipice of understanding

0:23:04.520 --> 0:23:08.399
<v Speaker 1>what the impact will be on valuations across stages, and

0:23:08.520 --> 0:23:11.160
<v Speaker 1>certainly for us it's it's an area where we think

0:23:11.160 --> 0:23:13.960
<v Speaker 1>there's a real exciting opportunity to continue being bullish on

0:23:14.040 --> 0:23:16.720
<v Speaker 1>long term opportunities. I am going to let Caroline have

0:23:16.760 --> 0:23:18.320
<v Speaker 1>all the fun, and I'm going to ask you a

0:23:18.359 --> 0:23:21.080
<v Speaker 1>slightly dull question about economics if you allow me to.

0:23:21.680 --> 0:23:25.280
<v Speaker 1>It's never dullared well, I know it's important. The funny

0:23:25.280 --> 0:23:26.919
<v Speaker 1>thing is that if you're a well i'm assuming if

0:23:26.960 --> 0:23:30.359
<v Speaker 1>you're a venture capitalist, you assess a broad range of data,

0:23:30.520 --> 0:23:34.399
<v Speaker 1>just as a public market analyst would or investor inflation

0:23:34.640 --> 0:23:36.679
<v Speaker 1>in the FED. You know, in every day for US

0:23:36.760 --> 0:23:40.560
<v Speaker 1>inflation in the FED. What does it mean to you

0:23:40.800 --> 0:23:43.520
<v Speaker 1>at this stage in the cycle. Well, you know we're VC,

0:23:43.720 --> 0:23:46.600
<v Speaker 1>so we're long term investors were not day traders. Obviously,

0:23:46.640 --> 0:23:48.879
<v Speaker 1>there's no denying the impact of the macer on the

0:23:48.920 --> 0:23:50.960
<v Speaker 1>micro and we've seen that very clearly in terms of

0:23:50.960 --> 0:23:54.879
<v Speaker 1>the opportunities for exits for for venture backed companies. But

0:23:54.920 --> 0:23:58.639
<v Speaker 1>when we're investing in deep technologies companies that we believe

0:23:58.720 --> 0:24:01.840
<v Speaker 1>our market makers, we have to look with a longer perspective,

0:24:01.840 --> 0:24:05.560
<v Speaker 1>and so you know three does not look particularly promising,

0:24:05.560 --> 0:24:07.640
<v Speaker 1>although none of us are nostra damas, but we're looking

0:24:07.680 --> 0:24:10.480
<v Speaker 1>ahead five to ten years from now and those opportunities

0:24:10.960 --> 0:24:13.280
<v Speaker 1>are very exciting to be investing in their early days.

0:24:13.920 --> 0:24:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Do you know you've just made general partner congratulations And

0:24:17.440 --> 0:24:19.760
<v Speaker 1>you focus a lot in the health space, in particular,

0:24:20.160 --> 0:24:23.960
<v Speaker 1>very much focused on female focused businesses. To what is

0:24:24.000 --> 0:24:27.760
<v Speaker 1>that more recession proof than other areas healthcare? Many have

0:24:27.840 --> 0:24:29.840
<v Speaker 1>turned to in the public market saying that this is

0:24:29.840 --> 0:24:31.840
<v Speaker 1>wanting to be investing for into at the moment with

0:24:32.440 --> 0:24:34.720
<v Speaker 1>higher interest rates and with a slower growth prospect. What

0:24:34.760 --> 0:24:39.520
<v Speaker 1>do you see in terms of the smaller, now growing industries. Absolutely,

0:24:39.560 --> 0:24:42.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean I've often said that health and digital health

0:24:42.119 --> 0:24:44.160
<v Speaker 1>is recession proof. Now that's not to say that it's

0:24:44.200 --> 0:24:46.800
<v Speaker 1>immune to the macro conditions. That's definitely not the case

0:24:46.800 --> 0:24:48.840
<v Speaker 1>in any look at the public markets, no matter how

0:24:48.880 --> 0:24:52.480
<v Speaker 1>well they're faring um, you know, respectively, it's it's very

0:24:52.520 --> 0:24:56.040
<v Speaker 1>clear that they're not. That being said, people will continue

0:24:56.080 --> 0:24:59.000
<v Speaker 1>to get sick, they will continue to have babies, we

0:24:59.040 --> 0:25:03.720
<v Speaker 1>will continue to have needs for therapeutics and for interventioning care,

0:25:03.800 --> 0:25:07.120
<v Speaker 1>perhaps more so in the future even than we do today.

0:25:07.320 --> 0:25:09.199
<v Speaker 1>And I think as a result, what we're seeing is

0:25:09.320 --> 0:25:14.639
<v Speaker 1>really expanded interest and also a bit of of a

0:25:14.760 --> 0:25:17.639
<v Speaker 1>slightly better opportunity than you're seeing, certainly not just on

0:25:17.680 --> 0:25:20.320
<v Speaker 1>the public side, you know. Pitchbook, I think just yesterday

0:25:20.359 --> 0:25:23.520
<v Speaker 1>published a report showing that the media deal valuations for

0:25:23.640 --> 0:25:27.080
<v Speaker 1>venture backed healthcare companies is actually up thirty three percent

0:25:27.200 --> 0:25:29.640
<v Speaker 1>year over a year, which is a really interesting take

0:25:29.800 --> 0:25:31.720
<v Speaker 1>visa of you where the rest of the market seemed

0:25:31.720 --> 0:25:34.200
<v Speaker 1>to be sitting. You know, one of our companies was

0:25:34.200 --> 0:25:36.080
<v Speaker 1>was on your show just a few weeks ago for

0:25:36.160 --> 0:25:38.639
<v Speaker 1>their series E, and that was a really exciting one

0:25:38.680 --> 0:25:41.600
<v Speaker 1>in women's health, where there's a lot of continued interest. Yeah,

0:25:41.600 --> 0:25:43.720
<v Speaker 1>shout out to Maven Clinic and were so pleased to

0:25:43.720 --> 0:25:46.000
<v Speaker 1>be able to stop the new show with that and

0:25:46.040 --> 0:25:49.160
<v Speaker 1>I with joining the show in that respect to bring

0:25:49.240 --> 0:25:51.520
<v Speaker 1>us that series E. But I'm gonna ask a sensitive

0:25:51.600 --> 0:25:53.600
<v Speaker 1>question now, Dia, and I know because you don't want

0:25:53.600 --> 0:25:55.840
<v Speaker 1>to shy away from these sorts of things. Lux Capital,

0:25:55.840 --> 0:25:58.359
<v Speaker 1>of course, has been enbrolled in the ft X situation.

0:25:58.400 --> 0:26:00.600
<v Speaker 1>You roat checks, not you per me, of course, and

0:26:00.640 --> 0:26:02.439
<v Speaker 1>you're not. Therefore, I'm not going to ask you about

0:26:02.480 --> 0:26:04.720
<v Speaker 1>your own due diligence in the space. But what do

0:26:04.760 --> 0:26:07.560
<v Speaker 1>you think internally the lessons you've learned are when you're

0:26:07.560 --> 0:26:10.719
<v Speaker 1>looking at writing checks in a diff more difficult situation

0:26:10.920 --> 0:26:13.679
<v Speaker 1>environment that we currently are, how are you looking for

0:26:13.720 --> 0:26:17.040
<v Speaker 1>companies to be building their corporate governance to be ensuring

0:26:17.080 --> 0:26:18.840
<v Speaker 1>that they're giving you all the accounts that you need

0:26:18.880 --> 0:26:22.120
<v Speaker 1>and the growth stories really there, you know, I think

0:26:22.160 --> 0:26:25.359
<v Speaker 1>this is something that's not necessarily just unique to that situation.

0:26:25.400 --> 0:26:28.359
<v Speaker 1>There are other cases across healthcare in the recent months

0:26:28.359 --> 0:26:31.080
<v Speaker 1>and years that have also really put a lens on

0:26:31.119 --> 0:26:33.960
<v Speaker 1>the importance of due diligence, and so there's no doubt

0:26:34.000 --> 0:26:36.840
<v Speaker 1>that that continues to be very important across the board.

0:26:37.080 --> 0:26:39.040
<v Speaker 1>And I think perhaps some of the slowdown that we're

0:26:39.040 --> 0:26:43.040
<v Speaker 1>anticipating in terms of the exuberance of because of you,

0:26:43.080 --> 0:26:46.720
<v Speaker 1>what we're expecting in three will give all investors more time,

0:26:47.320 --> 0:26:49.800
<v Speaker 1>um and more space to be able to do that,

0:26:49.840 --> 0:26:54.160
<v Speaker 1>which you know is certainly a positive thing. Dina. Come

0:26:54.200 --> 0:26:57.879
<v Speaker 1>back in the new year. Tell us how that is

0:26:57.920 --> 0:27:00.439
<v Speaker 1>starting to unfold for you, Dina Shoka. We love having

0:27:00.440 --> 0:27:02.520
<v Speaker 1>our run. Thank you general partner, Ever it lacks capital.

0:27:02.760 --> 0:27:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Wishing you happy holidays. We don't get to chat before

0:27:04.800 --> 0:27:07.000
<v Speaker 1>me while Let's talk exits now because we were just

0:27:07.040 --> 0:27:09.080
<v Speaker 1>going there and then and there's some are still happening

0:27:09.240 --> 0:27:12.080
<v Speaker 1>in the global startup space. In fact, let's go global

0:27:12.080 --> 0:27:15.720
<v Speaker 1>because Istanbul based quick commerce platform that's getting just for

0:27:15.880 --> 0:27:18.280
<v Speaker 1>its rival Gerrillas Technologies in a deal that was valued

0:27:18.280 --> 0:27:20.560
<v Speaker 1>at one point two billion according to sources. Now it

0:27:20.640 --> 0:27:23.800
<v Speaker 1>marks the increasing consolidation and what we all thought at

0:27:23.800 --> 0:27:26.200
<v Speaker 1>one point was an absolutely booming industry you couldn't move

0:27:26.240 --> 0:27:29.040
<v Speaker 1>for quick deliveries. But Guerrillas raised funds valuing the company

0:27:29.040 --> 0:27:32.000
<v Speaker 1>at about three billion before and I've been exploring its

0:27:32.040 --> 0:27:34.720
<v Speaker 1>options after. Investors just became so much more cautious over

0:27:34.720 --> 0:27:38.480
<v Speaker 1>the industry's path to profitability. I mean ed we were

0:27:38.480 --> 0:27:41.960
<v Speaker 1>all talking about how quickly one could order their various

0:27:42.040 --> 0:27:44.560
<v Speaker 1>groceries and they'd be coming within twenty minutes or so.

0:27:44.640 --> 0:27:47.920
<v Speaker 1>But it just became ever more evident that these companies

0:27:47.920 --> 0:27:49.880
<v Speaker 1>were not going to be able to head to profitability

0:27:49.880 --> 0:27:52.119
<v Speaker 1>with this many players in the space. So there's a

0:27:52.119 --> 0:27:54.359
<v Speaker 1>fantastic quote in the story from the founder of the

0:27:54.359 --> 0:27:57.679
<v Speaker 1>company saying, markets go up and go down for consumers

0:27:57.760 --> 0:28:00.480
<v Speaker 1>love our service. Convenience is here to stay. You know,

0:28:00.480 --> 0:28:02.960
<v Speaker 1>whether that's true or not, we don't yet know. You know,

0:28:03.000 --> 0:28:05.679
<v Speaker 1>the proofs in the pudding, but you know it's holiday

0:28:05.720 --> 0:28:08.119
<v Speaker 1>season and go to a lot of drinks with vcs

0:28:08.240 --> 0:28:10.080
<v Speaker 1>and you know they do say it's a case by

0:28:10.119 --> 0:28:13.680
<v Speaker 1>case basis. There are some fantastic startups that are borne

0:28:13.680 --> 0:28:16.280
<v Speaker 1>out of recession, that grow out of recession, and there's

0:28:16.320 --> 0:28:19.280
<v Speaker 1>opportunity right now if you can pick them out. Yeah,

0:28:19.320 --> 0:28:21.119
<v Speaker 1>and I think that this is what's going to be interesting.

0:28:21.200 --> 0:28:24.440
<v Speaker 1>Where are the exits being made? Are you doing exits

0:28:24.440 --> 0:28:28.159
<v Speaker 1>from acquisition one private company to a private company or ed?

0:28:28.440 --> 0:28:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Are you still managing to get to the public market

0:28:31.160 --> 0:28:33.600
<v Speaker 1>if that dreaded word, well, dreaded is not fair, but

0:28:33.840 --> 0:28:38.040
<v Speaker 1>spack interesting. So let's get more from another guest, Sam's

0:28:38.080 --> 0:28:41.440
<v Speaker 1>id CEO of get Around, which just went public on

0:28:41.520 --> 0:28:44.920
<v Speaker 1>the New York Stock Exchange or listed is shares. Get

0:28:44.960 --> 0:28:47.320
<v Speaker 1>Around is a company I know, you know I've written

0:28:47.320 --> 0:28:52.120
<v Speaker 1>about Get Around. We've reported about broadly, this platform in

0:28:52.160 --> 0:28:56.360
<v Speaker 1>which owners of vehicles can list their cars to be

0:28:56.440 --> 0:29:00.920
<v Speaker 1>rented out. It's like Airbnb for cars, Sam, why list

0:29:01.280 --> 0:29:04.280
<v Speaker 1>via this mechanism? I mean for us, you know, we

0:29:04.240 --> 0:29:06.360
<v Speaker 1>were in public be as you know, we had great partners,

0:29:06.920 --> 0:29:09.920
<v Speaker 1>We found committed capital capital that really allows us to

0:29:10.000 --> 0:29:11.560
<v Speaker 1>x you on our business plan, and it was really

0:29:11.560 --> 0:29:15.840
<v Speaker 1>about just continue to create long term value um and

0:29:15.920 --> 0:29:18.200
<v Speaker 1>to get out into the public markets and able to

0:29:18.240 --> 0:29:21.640
<v Speaker 1>have access to that, you know, uh, the public markets directly.

0:29:22.200 --> 0:29:23.840
<v Speaker 1>We felt it was the right thing for for us

0:29:23.840 --> 0:29:27.080
<v Speaker 1>in this particular circumstance, in this particular category. What sort

0:29:27.080 --> 0:29:29.960
<v Speaker 1>of with the money coming in, what does that now

0:29:30.000 --> 0:29:32.960
<v Speaker 1>create you in terms of space to build? Where are

0:29:32.960 --> 0:29:36.000
<v Speaker 1>you able to now drive forward? Get Around, particularly at

0:29:36.000 --> 0:29:38.240
<v Speaker 1>a time when more people might be incentivized to share

0:29:38.240 --> 0:29:42.880
<v Speaker 1>their car to get money in that way. Yeah, I

0:29:42.880 --> 0:29:44.160
<v Speaker 1>mean it is that type of time. I mean, I

0:29:44.200 --> 0:29:46.280
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of consumers are looking for options to

0:29:46.320 --> 0:29:50.360
<v Speaker 1>make extra money potentially, you know, drive extra income or

0:29:50.360 --> 0:29:52.840
<v Speaker 1>offset costs. And we you know, we just felt that

0:29:53.160 --> 0:29:55.720
<v Speaker 1>opportunity is right given what we see in the category

0:29:55.760 --> 0:29:57.880
<v Speaker 1>and in the market and some of the trends with

0:29:59.240 --> 0:30:02.840
<v Speaker 1>our partners and in more generally with the shift to

0:30:02.840 --> 0:30:06.200
<v Speaker 1>more consumers, you know, moving towards mobility and continuing to

0:30:06.200 --> 0:30:10.000
<v Speaker 1>shift those those those patterns of mobility. Um, you know,

0:30:10.040 --> 0:30:13.360
<v Speaker 1>we felt the time was right. Hey Sam, really quick,

0:30:14.400 --> 0:30:19.200
<v Speaker 1>you're pipping your great rival Turo to the public markets.

0:30:19.600 --> 0:30:25.840
<v Speaker 1>The reception interesting, What do you make of that? Yeah, Look,

0:30:25.880 --> 0:30:28.280
<v Speaker 1>I think there's no denying the macro is. It's just

0:30:28.320 --> 0:30:31.600
<v Speaker 1>a challenging market environment. But we aren't really optimizing for

0:30:31.760 --> 0:30:34.480
<v Speaker 1>that as much as optimizing for you know, really giving

0:30:34.520 --> 0:30:36.600
<v Speaker 1>fuel to the business in order to really execute on

0:30:36.600 --> 0:30:40.000
<v Speaker 1>our plans. And so you know, the way we think

0:30:40.000 --> 0:30:42.080
<v Speaker 1>about that is, really we want to continue to execute

0:30:42.240 --> 0:30:44.840
<v Speaker 1>create long term value, and over time we think that

0:30:44.960 --> 0:30:48.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, the market will respond and start to value

0:30:48.000 --> 0:30:52.320
<v Speaker 1>companies properly on fundamentals. Some thanks for spending some time

0:30:52.320 --> 0:30:54.560
<v Speaker 1>with us from the floor. Then I see Sam' side

0:30:54.560 --> 0:30:57.960
<v Speaker 1>CEO again around Meanwhile, coming up, we're gonna talk much

0:30:57.960 --> 0:31:00.440
<v Speaker 1>more about all the ongoing fall out in the collapse

0:31:00.440 --> 0:31:03.480
<v Speaker 1>of f t X lawmakers questioning officials over a silver

0:31:03.560 --> 0:31:06.240
<v Speaker 1>Gate Capital. It's a small bank that's facing some big

0:31:06.280 --> 0:31:09.400
<v Speaker 1>pain after a decision to really take on cryptoclients. This

0:31:09.520 --> 0:31:37.520
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg. It was once pretty obscure, smaller bank, and

0:31:37.560 --> 0:31:39.760
<v Speaker 1>then it got into crypto. Silver Gate Capital is and

0:31:39.840 --> 0:31:41.600
<v Speaker 1>what I'm talking about. It found its niche when it

0:31:41.640 --> 0:31:45.000
<v Speaker 1>started providing banking services to some pretty major crypto clients,

0:31:45.200 --> 0:31:48.880
<v Speaker 1>including well some background Freeze, f t X and Alameda Research.

0:31:49.320 --> 0:31:52.120
<v Speaker 1>Now it's of course facing scrutiny from regulators and lawmakers

0:31:52.120 --> 0:31:54.520
<v Speaker 1>on the back of that decision. Joining us now on

0:31:54.560 --> 0:31:58.080
<v Speaker 1>a great set of reporting Bloomberg's banking reporter Max Rays,

0:31:58.400 --> 0:32:01.080
<v Speaker 1>and Max just talk to us a out how solve

0:32:01.160 --> 0:32:03.680
<v Speaker 1>gate first of all, got in to servicing these sourts

0:32:03.680 --> 0:32:07.160
<v Speaker 1>of clients. Sure, first of all, thank you for having me,

0:32:07.240 --> 0:32:08.959
<v Speaker 1>and I think it might be helpful to back up

0:32:09.000 --> 0:32:12.480
<v Speaker 1>for a second sort of explain sort of the the

0:32:12.560 --> 0:32:16.520
<v Speaker 1>value proposition here for a bank. For for banks that

0:32:16.560 --> 0:32:20.240
<v Speaker 1>aren't dealing with crypto, you know, they're not helping to

0:32:20.440 --> 0:32:24.760
<v Speaker 1>exchange um tokens or anything like that. They're literally just

0:32:24.960 --> 0:32:30.120
<v Speaker 1>holding deposits for crypto customers and sending them, helping them

0:32:30.160 --> 0:32:32.880
<v Speaker 1>to send them back and forth right between themselves. The

0:32:33.240 --> 0:32:35.680
<v Speaker 1>value there is that you can bring these deposits onto

0:32:35.680 --> 0:32:37.600
<v Speaker 1>your balance sheet and you do not have to pay

0:32:37.600 --> 0:32:40.680
<v Speaker 1>out interests, right, so you essentially have a very affordable

0:32:40.680 --> 0:32:45.520
<v Speaker 1>way to fund yourself. And that's sort of what drew company,

0:32:45.560 --> 0:32:47.640
<v Speaker 1>a company like silver Gate into this, and other banks

0:32:47.680 --> 0:32:51.280
<v Speaker 1>have done it as well, Customers Bank, ORPS Signature Bank,

0:32:51.680 --> 0:32:56.840
<v Speaker 1>but obviously a few of them have had banking relationships

0:32:56.840 --> 0:33:01.400
<v Speaker 1>with f t X and Alameda. That has folks raising concerns.

0:33:01.400 --> 0:33:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Short sellers are kind of dog piling the stock, and

0:33:04.520 --> 0:33:07.720
<v Speaker 1>you have bombmakers who are asking questions and it's a

0:33:07.800 --> 0:33:10.960
<v Speaker 1>result of these relationships. From your early reporting and digging

0:33:11.000 --> 0:33:14.800
<v Speaker 1>around just how exposed has silver Gate become. What sort

0:33:14.800 --> 0:33:18.760
<v Speaker 1>of areas within the financial services they offered made it

0:33:19.200 --> 0:33:23.040
<v Speaker 1>more difficult to extricate themselves. Now, Yeah, I think the

0:33:23.080 --> 0:33:26.360
<v Speaker 1>biggest level of exposure is just the deposits they held

0:33:26.360 --> 0:33:28.280
<v Speaker 1>on their bound sheet. Silver Gate has said that they

0:33:28.320 --> 0:33:30.920
<v Speaker 1>did not lend to ft X. They made it very

0:33:30.960 --> 0:33:33.120
<v Speaker 1>clear that their only relationship with f t X and

0:33:33.200 --> 0:33:37.880
<v Speaker 1>related entities including Elomated Research the Hedge Fund, was a

0:33:37.920 --> 0:33:41.520
<v Speaker 1>deposit relationship, and so if you have to deposit with

0:33:41.600 --> 0:33:45.120
<v Speaker 1>silver Gate, you can send money to other clients who

0:33:45.160 --> 0:33:47.840
<v Speaker 1>also have those deposits on a platform they call the

0:33:48.040 --> 0:33:51.320
<v Speaker 1>sent the silver Gate Exchange Network. And what are reporting

0:33:51.320 --> 0:33:55.400
<v Speaker 1>indicating was indicated was that customers had been directed to

0:33:55.600 --> 0:33:59.320
<v Speaker 1>buy f t X to send money to Alometer Research,

0:33:59.680 --> 0:34:01.520
<v Speaker 1>and that was to in at least one case, a

0:34:01.600 --> 0:34:05.200
<v Speaker 1>silver Gate bank account, and that has raised concerns and

0:34:05.280 --> 0:34:07.880
<v Speaker 1>questions from lawmakers. Are reporting doesn't go any further and

0:34:08.239 --> 0:34:11.840
<v Speaker 1>saying sort of how that tied into the kind of

0:34:11.880 --> 0:34:15.239
<v Speaker 1>commingling of funds and so on that have been alleged

0:34:15.280 --> 0:34:17.160
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to at X and Alameda, But it

0:34:17.200 --> 0:34:21.560
<v Speaker 1>does mean that silver Gate is part of these really

0:34:21.600 --> 0:34:26.359
<v Speaker 1>difficult questions being raised by lawmakers, by regulators, by investors.

0:34:26.440 --> 0:34:29.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, how how did no one spot us? Right?

0:34:30.520 --> 0:34:33.120
<v Speaker 1>You raise a good point, Max about the short interests

0:34:33.160 --> 0:34:35.759
<v Speaker 1>on the stock in that it's publicly traded, right, it

0:34:35.800 --> 0:34:38.840
<v Speaker 1>almost has its own rise and full story. I was

0:34:38.840 --> 0:34:41.920
<v Speaker 1>looking my Bloomberg to the end of one when the

0:34:41.960 --> 0:34:45.959
<v Speaker 1>stock was above two dollars a share. Now we're down

0:34:45.960 --> 0:34:49.080
<v Speaker 1>at twenty one dollars a share. I mean, what was

0:34:49.120 --> 0:34:52.239
<v Speaker 1>the invest anxiety here. For Silvergate, it was just their

0:34:52.280 --> 0:34:57.160
<v Speaker 1>exposure to the contagion. So you would you what would

0:34:57.160 --> 0:34:59.200
<v Speaker 1>be helpful to do with his zoom out right, because

0:34:59.640 --> 0:35:02.760
<v Speaker 1>around this time last year we were talking about digital

0:35:02.760 --> 0:35:05.040
<v Speaker 1>assets being at all time highs and that's when the

0:35:05.080 --> 0:35:09.680
<v Speaker 1>stock hit two just about that period. But over the

0:35:09.760 --> 0:35:12.080
<v Speaker 1>last year we've had more events than just f t X.

0:35:12.280 --> 0:35:15.839
<v Speaker 1>We've had the blow up of the Terra Luna ecosystem,

0:35:15.880 --> 0:35:18.200
<v Speaker 1>which in turn led to the collapse of Three Arrow

0:35:18.239 --> 0:35:22.720
<v Speaker 1>Scare Capital, the collapse of Celsius, so publicly traded stocks

0:35:22.719 --> 0:35:26.480
<v Speaker 1>with the exposure to crypto, that's silver Gate, that's other companies,

0:35:26.520 --> 0:35:30.040
<v Speaker 1>that's you know, names like micro Strategy, which literally just

0:35:30.080 --> 0:35:32.360
<v Speaker 1>hold a bit corn on the balance sheet. All of

0:35:32.360 --> 0:35:34.719
<v Speaker 1>those companies have taken a beating in the last year

0:35:34.880 --> 0:35:38.520
<v Speaker 1>because of this anxiety, and just the blow up of

0:35:38.560 --> 0:35:41.640
<v Speaker 1>f t X sort of accelerated and worse than that impact,

0:35:41.960 --> 0:35:46.000
<v Speaker 1>I would say, max would have silver Getting said about

0:35:46.000 --> 0:35:49.520
<v Speaker 1>all of this very quickly. Certainly, silver Gate has been

0:35:49.520 --> 0:35:52.440
<v Speaker 1>pretty clear in saying that the controls that they had

0:35:52.520 --> 0:35:56.000
<v Speaker 1>in place were sufficient, that they again had no sort

0:35:56.000 --> 0:35:59.120
<v Speaker 1>of lending or any other kind of relationship, and that

0:35:59.480 --> 0:36:02.800
<v Speaker 1>they were in one statement to NBC, they describe themselves

0:36:02.840 --> 0:36:08.200
<v Speaker 1>as victims of SPF and is misleading practices the same

0:36:08.200 --> 0:36:11.080
<v Speaker 1>way everyone else's. So the company has been pretty frank

0:36:11.080 --> 0:36:14.279
<v Speaker 1>in denying any claims of wrongdoing. And it should be

0:36:14.320 --> 0:36:17.440
<v Speaker 1>made clear that authorities have not alleged any wrongdoing. They

0:36:17.480 --> 0:36:20.040
<v Speaker 1>have been accused of wrongdoing, yes, by authorities. It's just

0:36:20.040 --> 0:36:23.400
<v Speaker 1>there are questions circling. Yeah, thank you for your reporting.

0:36:23.400 --> 0:36:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg's Max rays there coming up. The world's most populous

0:36:28.280 --> 0:36:32.040
<v Speaker 1>nation rapidly pulling back on its COVID zero policies. We'll

0:36:32.040 --> 0:36:34.000
<v Speaker 1>tell you what this means to the health of people

0:36:34.040 --> 0:36:36.520
<v Speaker 1>in China, but also, of course the tech companies doing

0:36:36.560 --> 0:36:54.000
<v Speaker 1>business there. Next this is Bloomberg. While Hong Kong has

0:36:54.080 --> 0:36:57.200
<v Speaker 1>served as a blueprint for China's opening up from COVID,

0:36:57.480 --> 0:37:01.600
<v Speaker 1>it's also a huge, huge cars canary tale. Now. When

0:37:01.600 --> 0:37:05.200
<v Speaker 1>the omicron variants swept through this modern city of seven

0:37:05.200 --> 0:37:07.680
<v Speaker 1>and a half million earlier part of this year, the

0:37:07.800 --> 0:37:12.880
<v Speaker 1>city's sophisticated healthcare system was simply overwhelmed. At one point,

0:37:12.960 --> 0:37:15.840
<v Speaker 1>Hong Kong had the world's highest death rate due to COVID.

0:37:16.200 --> 0:37:19.360
<v Speaker 1>There simply wasn't enough space to put all the patients

0:37:19.840 --> 0:37:22.719
<v Speaker 1>or bodies. Some of the sick were put outside on

0:37:22.800 --> 0:37:26.279
<v Speaker 1>bourneys as body bags, with the deceased stacked up in

0:37:26.360 --> 0:37:31.080
<v Speaker 1>some words, next to the infected living mords two were inundated.

0:37:31.719 --> 0:37:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Most of Hong Kong's nearly eleven thousand total COVID deaths

0:37:35.280 --> 0:37:39.760
<v Speaker 1>happened between February and April of this year. Like Hong Kong,

0:37:39.880 --> 0:37:44.120
<v Speaker 1>China has a largely under vaccinated elderly population, but on

0:37:44.160 --> 0:37:48.200
<v Speaker 1>a much much larger scale, and China too doesn't have

0:37:48.360 --> 0:37:53.040
<v Speaker 1>the more sophisticated mRNA vaccinations available. We have to remembered

0:37:53.040 --> 0:37:56.840
<v Speaker 1>as China has been protected to public for so long,

0:37:57.239 --> 0:38:01.239
<v Speaker 1>there has been no hurt amenity in China. Uh so um.

0:38:01.280 --> 0:38:05.080
<v Speaker 1>This is going to start, and this process is not

0:38:05.120 --> 0:38:08.200
<v Speaker 1>going to be smooth. It will be quite difficult. With

0:38:08.239 --> 0:38:13.000
<v Speaker 1>a sudden dismantling of COVID restrictions, including mandatory PCR testing

0:38:13.040 --> 0:38:16.440
<v Speaker 1>to enter public spaces, China is bracing for a surge

0:38:16.560 --> 0:38:20.920
<v Speaker 1>in infections and death more than two million fatalities by

0:38:20.960 --> 0:38:25.080
<v Speaker 1>one estimate. Criticism of COVID zero is rapidly being replaced

0:38:25.120 --> 0:38:29.279
<v Speaker 1>by concern that the rapid policy shift away from the

0:38:29.440 --> 0:38:33.320
<v Speaker 1>all out eradication of the virus is happening too fast,

0:38:33.600 --> 0:38:36.799
<v Speaker 1>and that China is ill prepared like Hong Kong was

0:38:36.880 --> 0:38:41.520
<v Speaker 1>back in March for a health crisis of unseen proportions.

0:38:41.880 --> 0:38:48.239
<v Speaker 1>Stephen Angel, Bloomberg News, Hong Kong, I mean, clearly a

0:38:48.320 --> 0:38:51.080
<v Speaker 1>very tough story to continue to have to talk about.

0:38:51.160 --> 0:38:54.879
<v Speaker 1>We forget the health impacts, of course, the death impacts,

0:38:55.200 --> 0:38:56.960
<v Speaker 1>and but also we have to talk, because we do

0:38:57.000 --> 0:38:59.440
<v Speaker 1>a bloom Berg time and time again, the economic impacts

0:38:59.440 --> 0:39:00.799
<v Speaker 1>of all of this. We want to thank our Asia

0:39:00.840 --> 0:39:03.799
<v Speaker 1>G correspondent Steven Angle for that piece, because you've been

0:39:03.840 --> 0:39:06.560
<v Speaker 1>doing some really thoughtful leadership in terms of what's happening

0:39:06.560 --> 0:39:08.840
<v Speaker 1>from companies such as Tesla, companies that are desperate to

0:39:08.880 --> 0:39:11.920
<v Speaker 1>get into China and then find for the demand is

0:39:11.920 --> 0:39:15.120
<v Speaker 1>being eroded, but in some ways the supply too. You know,

0:39:15.200 --> 0:39:18.920
<v Speaker 1>we may have stopped tracking the virus um in Europe

0:39:18.960 --> 0:39:21.080
<v Speaker 1>and in North America day to day, but in China.

0:39:21.239 --> 0:39:24.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, look how quickly have we gone from COVID

0:39:24.200 --> 0:39:28.080
<v Speaker 1>impacting production or impacting the ability of tech companies like

0:39:28.200 --> 0:39:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Tesla to carry out their business to now the impact

0:39:31.239 --> 0:39:34.040
<v Speaker 1>on demand. Right, and even though there's this reopening and

0:39:34.080 --> 0:39:36.719
<v Speaker 1>easing of restrictions. There are lots of questions about that.

0:39:36.760 --> 0:39:40.040
<v Speaker 1>The most recent report from Bloomberg. According to sources, they're

0:39:40.040 --> 0:39:42.799
<v Speaker 1>actually going to shut down the assembly lines imminently in

0:39:42.840 --> 0:39:45.480
<v Speaker 1>Shanghai and then later in the Chinese New Year in

0:39:45.560 --> 0:39:48.200
<v Speaker 1>January do the same. Some of that, according to sources,

0:39:48.280 --> 0:39:51.400
<v Speaker 1>is for maintenance upgrades, but there's still this question about demand.

0:39:51.440 --> 0:39:55.080
<v Speaker 1>It's a really difficult situation I supposed to understand and

0:39:55.120 --> 0:39:57.320
<v Speaker 1>how hard is that going to be to peel apart?

0:39:57.400 --> 0:39:59.920
<v Speaker 1>What is just the usual way of things during the

0:40:00.000 --> 0:40:02.560
<v Speaker 1>beginning of January for China and what actually is the

0:40:02.600 --> 0:40:05.960
<v Speaker 1>COVID impact here? Well, usual things for the beginning part

0:40:05.960 --> 0:40:07.640
<v Speaker 1>of January when you had the Chinese New Year and

0:40:07.680 --> 0:40:10.160
<v Speaker 1>normal for Tesla to do maintenance. It's just that Tesla

0:40:10.200 --> 0:40:13.720
<v Speaker 1>doesn't communicate and say here's our plan, and so investors,

0:40:13.760 --> 0:40:15.440
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the share price this week, have

0:40:15.560 --> 0:40:17.640
<v Speaker 1>got a little nervous despite a positive end for the

0:40:17.640 --> 0:40:20.200
<v Speaker 1>stock on Friday. I have a feeling we'll be talking

0:40:20.239 --> 0:40:23.759
<v Speaker 1>about both China, both Tesla planning more next week. But

0:40:23.960 --> 0:40:28.080
<v Speaker 1>for today, Ed, that's it for this addition of Bloomberg Technology. Hey, yeah,

0:40:28.120 --> 0:40:30.320
<v Speaker 1>that does it? Don't forget to check out our podcast.

0:40:30.400 --> 0:40:32.520
<v Speaker 1>You can find it on the Bloomberg Terminal of course,

0:40:32.520 --> 0:40:36.880
<v Speaker 1>on Apple, Spotify and always on iHeart Radio, Big Week Carrow.

0:40:37.000 --> 0:41:00.960
<v Speaker 1>But that's it for us. This is Bloomberg two.