1 00:00:02,520 --> 00:00:05,720 Speaker 1: Hi, this is Vickie with the Bloomberg Crypto podcast team. 2 00:00:05,800 --> 00:00:07,960 Speaker 1: We've been taking a break this week to recharge our 3 00:00:08,000 --> 00:00:10,440 Speaker 1: batteries for the new year, and we'll be back tomorrow 4 00:00:10,440 --> 00:00:13,200 Speaker 1: with some fresh episodes for you. But today we're re 5 00:00:13,360 --> 00:00:15,880 Speaker 1: upping the last in our series of our team favorites, 6 00:00:16,160 --> 00:00:18,840 Speaker 1: and this one is definitely in my top ten. It's 7 00:00:18,840 --> 00:00:23,480 Speaker 1: a fascinating interview with Bloomberg reporters Ellen Milligan and David Vorriacos. 8 00:00:23,920 --> 00:00:26,759 Speaker 1: They walk us through how police and FBI agents have 9 00:00:26,840 --> 00:00:30,000 Speaker 1: had to rethink how to recover stolen goods when they're 10 00:00:30,040 --> 00:00:32,960 Speaker 1: dealing with digital assets. This sort of turns into a 11 00:00:33,040 --> 00:00:36,440 Speaker 1: Keystone Caper's type adventure with agents trying to track down 12 00:00:36,479 --> 00:00:39,680 Speaker 1: digital keys after a raid or a seizure, all the 13 00:00:39,720 --> 00:00:42,720 Speaker 1: gain access to stolen crypto. All of us here on 14 00:00:42,760 --> 00:00:46,159 Speaker 1: the Bloomberg Crypto team hope you had a great end too, 15 00:00:46,320 --> 00:00:48,240 Speaker 1: and we look forward to what the new year will bring. 16 00:00:48,640 --> 00:00:59,800 Speaker 1: Hope you enjoyed this one picture this You're the FBI 17 00:01:00,200 --> 00:01:02,400 Speaker 1: trying to track down the digital keys that will give 18 00:01:02,440 --> 00:01:06,800 Speaker 1: you access to illicit or stolen crypto. You're rifling through books, 19 00:01:07,160 --> 00:01:11,759 Speaker 1: paper stuffed in suitcases. You're tearing open gum wrappers. It's 20 00:01:11,760 --> 00:01:15,000 Speaker 1: like something out of a movie. But in the world 21 00:01:15,000 --> 00:01:18,360 Speaker 1: of crypto, these odd nooks and crannies have become totally 22 00:01:18,480 --> 00:01:24,200 Speaker 1: normal places for law enforcement to look for digital passwords alone. 23 00:01:24,600 --> 00:01:26,840 Speaker 1: Cops in the U S and the UK sees billions 24 00:01:26,840 --> 00:01:30,600 Speaker 1: of dollars in crypto assets from various different criminal busts. 25 00:01:31,120 --> 00:01:34,319 Speaker 1: With so much money on the line, enforcement agencies around 26 00:01:34,319 --> 00:01:37,520 Speaker 1: the world have had to learn and learn quickly how 27 00:01:37,560 --> 00:01:41,000 Speaker 1: to suppot these digital assets and seize them from accused criminals. 28 00:01:41,360 --> 00:01:44,440 Speaker 1: Today I'm joined by Bloomberg reporters Ellen Milligan. They are 29 00:01:44,480 --> 00:01:47,880 Speaker 1: spending all this taxpayer money to train these police officers 30 00:01:47,920 --> 00:01:50,960 Speaker 1: in crypto, and then they're losing them. And David Vorriacos 31 00:01:51,280 --> 00:01:55,080 Speaker 1: while the crypto was in the possession of the US government, 32 00:01:55,200 --> 00:01:57,720 Speaker 1: stole it from right under their noses. To discuss how 33 00:01:57,720 --> 00:02:01,240 Speaker 1: the seizures of digital assets are transforming leasing policies and 34 00:02:01,280 --> 00:02:07,640 Speaker 1: protocols around the world. Ellen, David, thank you so much 35 00:02:07,640 --> 00:02:10,080 Speaker 1: for joining us today, Thanks for having us. We're going 36 00:02:10,120 --> 00:02:13,600 Speaker 1: to talk about something kind of weird, which is how 37 00:02:13,639 --> 00:02:19,400 Speaker 1: do police officers sees imaginary money. And I don't just 38 00:02:19,400 --> 00:02:22,320 Speaker 1: mean imaginary in the sense of contested valuation. I mean 39 00:02:22,360 --> 00:02:26,840 Speaker 1: imaginary as in not cash, not physical, not things that 40 00:02:26,880 --> 00:02:29,040 Speaker 1: you can sort of wrap your head around. You know, 41 00:02:29,080 --> 00:02:31,120 Speaker 1: people are breaking down the door and they're like freeze 42 00:02:31,120 --> 00:02:33,280 Speaker 1: and we're gonna take all your stuff. You have been 43 00:02:33,280 --> 00:02:36,800 Speaker 1: writing about what happens when cops sees crypto. Tell us 44 00:02:36,840 --> 00:02:42,200 Speaker 1: more about what that's like. Well, police traditionally have sees 45 00:02:43,080 --> 00:02:49,880 Speaker 1: physical items like jewelry, cash, cars, boats, planes, and with crypto, 46 00:02:50,480 --> 00:02:52,520 Speaker 1: they have to know that it's there, and they have 47 00:02:52,639 --> 00:02:56,240 Speaker 1: to be educated enough about the process to understand that 48 00:02:56,360 --> 00:02:59,280 Speaker 1: it has value and there are are unusual ways to 49 00:02:59,360 --> 00:03:03,040 Speaker 1: access and so that's what we wrote about. The police 50 00:03:03,080 --> 00:03:07,280 Speaker 1: around the world are educating themselves on what crypto is 51 00:03:07,360 --> 00:03:10,160 Speaker 1: and how to access it. Then once they get it, 52 00:03:10,480 --> 00:03:13,639 Speaker 1: how they store it and how they sell it and 53 00:03:13,720 --> 00:03:18,160 Speaker 1: ellen what does that look like. Well, really, there's a 54 00:03:18,200 --> 00:03:22,440 Speaker 1: few different elements to this. Like David said, there's the 55 00:03:22,560 --> 00:03:27,040 Speaker 1: seizing of the crypto and discovering it, which is easier 56 00:03:27,080 --> 00:03:31,680 Speaker 1: said than done, because often there's not a physical element 57 00:03:31,720 --> 00:03:35,400 Speaker 1: to crypto. Sometimes there is like a kind of hardware 58 00:03:35,480 --> 00:03:39,640 Speaker 1: device that crypto wallet is kept on or something like that, 59 00:03:39,760 --> 00:03:46,120 Speaker 1: but often these are digital assets and to discover them 60 00:03:46,160 --> 00:03:50,560 Speaker 1: and then to seize them, you need a seed phrase 61 00:03:50,880 --> 00:03:54,400 Speaker 1: that accesses the crypto wallet. So even if you're holding 62 00:03:54,600 --> 00:03:58,680 Speaker 1: a keep key device, for example, police won't know how 63 00:03:58,800 --> 00:04:02,600 Speaker 1: much bitcoin or another cryptocurrency is held on there until 64 00:04:02,640 --> 00:04:06,680 Speaker 1: they can access it using this kind of password, and 65 00:04:06,720 --> 00:04:09,920 Speaker 1: then they're storing it once they've seized it. How do 66 00:04:09,960 --> 00:04:14,680 Speaker 1: they keep this asset safe often for years while you 67 00:04:14,720 --> 00:04:19,320 Speaker 1: go through a criminal trial and then a forfeiture order. Um. 68 00:04:19,400 --> 00:04:23,160 Speaker 1: There's real security issues with hacks, for example, but also 69 00:04:23,240 --> 00:04:26,320 Speaker 1: there's you know, in some cases there have been corrupt 70 00:04:26,360 --> 00:04:35,640 Speaker 1: police officers who have taken it for themselves. Um. And 71 00:04:35,680 --> 00:04:39,680 Speaker 1: then the last element is how you release that that 72 00:04:39,800 --> 00:04:43,279 Speaker 1: cryptocurrency um, if you give it back to victims or 73 00:04:43,279 --> 00:04:45,680 Speaker 1: what value you give it back to victims if the 74 00:04:45,760 --> 00:04:51,880 Speaker 1: state keeps it. These are the questions that law enforcement 75 00:04:51,960 --> 00:04:55,640 Speaker 1: has been grappling with, and what David and I really 76 00:04:55,640 --> 00:05:00,559 Speaker 1: discovered is there's no standardized procedure of where that people 77 00:05:00,600 --> 00:05:03,479 Speaker 1: do this every as in any of the parts like 78 00:05:03,560 --> 00:05:08,480 Speaker 1: each one is idiosyncratic exactly, and every different law agency 79 00:05:08,560 --> 00:05:11,279 Speaker 1: around the world and different law agencies within the same 80 00:05:11,320 --> 00:05:14,880 Speaker 1: countries do it differently. And the police let the rest 81 00:05:14,880 --> 00:05:16,640 Speaker 1: of the world when it comes to crypto, have had 82 00:05:16,680 --> 00:05:19,520 Speaker 1: to learn this as they go along, and inevitably mistakes 83 00:05:19,520 --> 00:05:21,719 Speaker 1: have been made along the way, and they're still grappling 84 00:05:21,760 --> 00:05:25,400 Speaker 1: with this. So you mentioned kind of three elements, each 85 00:05:25,400 --> 00:05:28,719 Speaker 1: of which sounds hilariously complicated. So let's let's take one 86 00:05:28,720 --> 00:05:32,640 Speaker 1: of each one in turn. First of all, is the 87 00:05:32,640 --> 00:05:37,440 Speaker 1: the identification, right, So, like something suspicious is happening, we 88 00:05:37,520 --> 00:05:40,640 Speaker 1: think that's a suspicious things in crypto. We've figured out 89 00:05:41,200 --> 00:05:44,880 Speaker 1: that that exists. What are the steps involved in Okay, 90 00:05:44,920 --> 00:05:46,919 Speaker 1: we think that this is suspicious. We have, you know, 91 00:05:47,000 --> 00:05:49,520 Speaker 1: good cause we have all the people work, etcetera. That's required. 92 00:05:49,920 --> 00:05:53,360 Speaker 1: How do they even get those passwords in the first place. Well, 93 00:05:53,760 --> 00:05:57,760 Speaker 1: in identifying the suspicious crypto, they can see the movement 94 00:05:57,760 --> 00:06:00,720 Speaker 1: of crypto on the blockchain. That is a public um 95 00:06:01,240 --> 00:06:04,560 Speaker 1: ledger ledger that they can see, and they can What 96 00:06:04,680 --> 00:06:08,760 Speaker 1: they must first do is trace it to criminal activity. Uh. 97 00:06:08,800 --> 00:06:12,239 Speaker 1: And once they've traced it to criminal activity, they can 98 00:06:12,279 --> 00:06:16,680 Speaker 1: then get a court order two seize wallets that are 99 00:06:16,720 --> 00:06:21,000 Speaker 1: associated with UM say stolen crypto. At that point they 100 00:06:21,120 --> 00:06:25,279 Speaker 1: can't they cannot actually access those wallets without the seed 101 00:06:25,320 --> 00:06:28,880 Speaker 1: recovery phrases, and they can come in different ways. They 102 00:06:28,920 --> 00:06:31,680 Speaker 1: may be written on slips of paper. They may get 103 00:06:31,720 --> 00:06:35,039 Speaker 1: it from UM insiders who are familiar with it. But 104 00:06:35,120 --> 00:06:37,960 Speaker 1: if they do not have those seed recovery phrases, they 105 00:06:38,000 --> 00:06:42,000 Speaker 1: can't The police cannot access the crypto, so they can't 106 00:06:42,080 --> 00:06:47,159 Speaker 1: say compel and exchange to have that crypto over to them. 107 00:06:47,200 --> 00:06:50,640 Speaker 1: There's a case UM that's pending in federal court in 108 00:06:50,640 --> 00:06:58,200 Speaker 1: Washington in which UM a guy named Gary Harmon from Akron, Ohio. UM. 109 00:06:58,279 --> 00:07:01,680 Speaker 1: He is alleged to have stolen crypto right from out 110 00:07:01,960 --> 00:07:04,800 Speaker 1: under the noses of the Internal Revenue Service, which had 111 00:07:04,839 --> 00:07:10,120 Speaker 1: seized crypto from Gary's brother Larry Harmon, who pleaded guilty 112 00:07:10,520 --> 00:07:15,520 Speaker 1: UM two charges associated with running a crypto mixer and 113 00:07:15,680 --> 00:07:20,640 Speaker 1: helping to obscure the identity of crypto. And the federal 114 00:07:20,680 --> 00:07:24,400 Speaker 1: government alleges that Gary Harmon, while the crypto was in 115 00:07:24,440 --> 00:07:27,480 Speaker 1: the possession of the U. S Government, stole it from 116 00:07:27,560 --> 00:07:30,640 Speaker 1: right under their noses and has a value of many 117 00:07:30,680 --> 00:07:36,360 Speaker 1: millions of dollars. He's scheduled to go to trial early 118 00:07:36,440 --> 00:07:39,320 Speaker 1: next year, but there have been negotiations that have been 119 00:07:39,400 --> 00:07:43,680 Speaker 1: spelled out in court papers in which Uh, the federal 120 00:07:43,720 --> 00:07:47,560 Speaker 1: government just wants the seed recovery phrase so they can 121 00:07:47,640 --> 00:07:52,320 Speaker 1: have the crypto. And Gary Harmon's lawyers say that's essentially 122 00:07:52,440 --> 00:07:56,360 Speaker 1: tantamount to him admitting he committed the crime. Interesting, so 123 00:07:56,960 --> 00:08:00,320 Speaker 1: all of the big parts of jurisp it and so 124 00:08:00,400 --> 00:08:02,720 Speaker 1: people might be familiar with now being applied to the 125 00:08:02,760 --> 00:08:06,360 Speaker 1: slightly more chaotic entity is involved in crypto. That sounds 126 00:08:06,400 --> 00:08:11,160 Speaker 1: like fun Ellen, you mentioned that that's the second part 127 00:08:11,280 --> 00:08:14,840 Speaker 1: of this complex thing around storage. There seems to be 128 00:08:15,000 --> 00:08:17,320 Speaker 1: part of the problem the David is describing if if 129 00:08:17,360 --> 00:08:20,040 Speaker 1: another entity can just be like, Nope, that's mine and 130 00:08:20,120 --> 00:08:22,760 Speaker 1: take it once that crypto has been seized by the 131 00:08:22,760 --> 00:08:25,000 Speaker 1: government or by the police, Like, what's going on there? 132 00:08:25,040 --> 00:08:29,640 Speaker 1: What are those faiel safes exactly? And Um, A lot 133 00:08:29,640 --> 00:08:33,679 Speaker 1: of these cases have come out of like the eighteen 134 00:08:33,760 --> 00:08:37,960 Speaker 1: time where there was kind of the last big spike 135 00:08:38,000 --> 00:08:43,880 Speaker 1: in crypto and then crash before before spike. Um, and 136 00:08:43,920 --> 00:08:46,240 Speaker 1: a lot of those cases came out of hacks. And 137 00:08:46,280 --> 00:08:48,760 Speaker 1: that just shows you even if the police are holding 138 00:08:48,800 --> 00:08:52,280 Speaker 1: it um and storing this crypto in their own internal 139 00:08:52,320 --> 00:08:56,040 Speaker 1: system or outsourced system, there's still a danger that that 140 00:08:56,080 --> 00:08:58,000 Speaker 1: could be hacked and when you've got cases like the 141 00:08:58,000 --> 00:09:01,839 Speaker 1: bit for next case that David spoke about, I mean, 142 00:09:01,880 --> 00:09:05,440 Speaker 1: the whole world knows how much UM that this law 143 00:09:05,520 --> 00:09:10,079 Speaker 1: enforcement agency has ceased, and it becomes very vulnerable, vulnerable 144 00:09:10,160 --> 00:09:14,079 Speaker 1: because of that. I spoke to a small police force 145 00:09:14,160 --> 00:09:19,480 Speaker 1: in southern England for this story. They stumbled across crypto 146 00:09:20,120 --> 00:09:24,679 Speaker 1: for the first time accidentally really in twenty seventeen. So 147 00:09:24,760 --> 00:09:28,200 Speaker 1: this was a kidnapping case UM where a guy was kidnapped. 148 00:09:28,559 --> 00:09:30,959 Speaker 1: Turned out his house was a cannabis farm. So they 149 00:09:30,960 --> 00:09:33,600 Speaker 1: did some digging around and they found this keep key 150 00:09:33,640 --> 00:09:38,000 Speaker 1: device which had a notepad attached to it with two 151 00:09:38,160 --> 00:09:43,080 Speaker 1: seed phrases, and it had nine hundred grand in bitcoin 152 00:09:43,160 --> 00:09:47,880 Speaker 1: I think on it. And so what police did is 153 00:09:47,960 --> 00:09:50,040 Speaker 1: that that there was no precedent for this. They had 154 00:09:50,040 --> 00:09:52,480 Speaker 1: no idea what to do. Most of them didn't really 155 00:09:52,480 --> 00:09:55,280 Speaker 1: know what krypto was. They bought their own key key 156 00:09:55,320 --> 00:10:00,400 Speaker 1: device and they transferred UM the bitcoin from his wallet 157 00:10:00,400 --> 00:10:04,120 Speaker 1: to their wallet, their crypto wallet, and then they kept 158 00:10:04,160 --> 00:10:06,720 Speaker 1: this keep key device and the seed phrases in a 159 00:10:06,840 --> 00:10:10,400 Speaker 1: safe and only to hang on like a physical a 160 00:10:10,520 --> 00:10:13,679 Speaker 1: physical safe in the police station. And I need two 161 00:10:13,720 --> 00:10:19,000 Speaker 1: policemen had access to the to the safe. And that's 162 00:10:19,040 --> 00:10:23,520 Speaker 1: because in the silk Row case that David referred to, UM, 163 00:10:23,600 --> 00:10:27,640 Speaker 1: there two police officers ran off in that case in 164 00:10:27,679 --> 00:10:31,920 Speaker 1: the US with some of the money that they were storing. UM, 165 00:10:32,000 --> 00:10:34,600 Speaker 1: and so there was a you know, the police are 166 00:10:34,679 --> 00:10:37,920 Speaker 1: very worried about corrupt police officers but also about losing 167 00:10:38,880 --> 00:10:40,920 Speaker 1: losing the money. So that's how they did it. And 168 00:10:40,960 --> 00:10:44,440 Speaker 1: then UM they eventually sold it to a trusted exchange. 169 00:10:44,480 --> 00:10:47,600 Speaker 1: Now they don't do that anymore, not surprisingly because it 170 00:10:47,760 --> 00:10:52,440 Speaker 1: is very dangerous to keep such a millions of dollars 171 00:10:51,440 --> 00:10:56,600 Speaker 1: in in a mini like small police station in southern England. 172 00:10:56,800 --> 00:11:00,600 Speaker 1: It's ridiculous now, um, but these are the kinds of 173 00:11:00,679 --> 00:11:02,920 Speaker 1: ways that they would do it as they were learning 174 00:11:03,280 --> 00:11:06,680 Speaker 1: on the job. And I mean now what they do 175 00:11:06,800 --> 00:11:10,120 Speaker 1: and what most UK law enforcement agencies do, which is 176 00:11:10,200 --> 00:11:14,080 Speaker 1: they have a UM. They outsource it to a company 177 00:11:14,120 --> 00:11:19,920 Speaker 1: called Kamani, which is backed by a Ledger and and others, 178 00:11:20,120 --> 00:11:24,240 Speaker 1: and it's they've got their own secure, high tech like 179 00:11:24,559 --> 00:11:28,240 Speaker 1: system of James. So they say, you know, I guess 180 00:11:28,240 --> 00:11:31,440 Speaker 1: time will time will tell. We'll be right back with 181 00:11:31,480 --> 00:11:35,240 Speaker 1: more from Bloomberg reporters. David Vorriakos and Ellen Milligan on 182 00:11:35,280 --> 00:11:37,640 Speaker 1: how law enforcement is keeping up with this new digital 183 00:11:37,679 --> 00:11:46,720 Speaker 1: to mention of financial crime. I want to push on 184 00:11:46,760 --> 00:11:49,400 Speaker 1: something that you're saying here about. You know, they tried 185 00:11:49,480 --> 00:11:53,120 Speaker 1: some stuff, the stuff didn't necessarily work. Now they may 186 00:11:53,160 --> 00:11:56,080 Speaker 1: be getting better at it. How are they getting better? 187 00:11:56,200 --> 00:11:59,480 Speaker 1: Like where are they finding people? You've mentioned outsourcing, but 188 00:11:59,520 --> 00:12:03,640 Speaker 1: they obvious we need police officers who are themselves trained 189 00:12:03,840 --> 00:12:06,120 Speaker 1: in knowing what to do. What has that process been like? 190 00:12:06,679 --> 00:12:09,840 Speaker 1: So in the UK, UM the police lobbied the government, 191 00:12:09,920 --> 00:12:13,400 Speaker 1: the Home Office UM for funding to train about two 192 00:12:13,840 --> 00:12:19,160 Speaker 1: fifty officers around the country in how to investigate sees 193 00:12:19,320 --> 00:12:22,360 Speaker 1: and realize the value of these assets. They were dubbed 194 00:12:22,400 --> 00:12:31,120 Speaker 1: crypto tactical advisors. Yes, and I think one or two 195 00:12:31,200 --> 00:12:34,040 Speaker 1: from every force around the country was trained in this 196 00:12:34,480 --> 00:12:36,520 Speaker 1: and that really helped them. And then they did a 197 00:12:36,520 --> 00:12:40,840 Speaker 1: public procurement process UM to outsource this and I know 198 00:12:40,920 --> 00:12:45,040 Speaker 1: that that's been done in the US less successfully UM, 199 00:12:45,080 --> 00:12:48,880 Speaker 1: which David can tell you about. But actually the trouble 200 00:12:48,960 --> 00:12:52,480 Speaker 1: that they're having now is UM they've lost a number 201 00:12:52,640 --> 00:12:57,280 Speaker 1: of these crypto tactical advisors to coin based chain analysts. 202 00:12:57,320 --> 00:13:00,320 Speaker 1: These firms who can triple their pay. So that's something 203 00:13:00,360 --> 00:13:02,960 Speaker 1: that really struggling with is they are spending all this 204 00:13:03,280 --> 00:13:06,240 Speaker 1: taxpayer money to train these police officers in crypto and 205 00:13:06,240 --> 00:13:09,079 Speaker 1: then they're losing them to these firms who can pay 206 00:13:09,120 --> 00:13:12,120 Speaker 1: them far more. So let me just make sure I'm 207 00:13:12,200 --> 00:13:15,679 Speaker 1: understanding this. I a U S taxpayer, have nominally contributed 208 00:13:15,720 --> 00:13:20,679 Speaker 1: to somebody working for coin base right now, essentially potentially 209 00:13:21,360 --> 00:13:26,040 Speaker 1: I as a UK taxpayer, definitely um I would say 210 00:13:26,040 --> 00:13:28,880 Speaker 1: also in the US, I mean the FBI and the 211 00:13:28,920 --> 00:13:33,959 Speaker 1: Internal Revenue Service have some extremely talented investigators and they 212 00:13:34,000 --> 00:13:37,600 Speaker 1: have a very large databases at their access which are 213 00:13:37,679 --> 00:13:40,800 Speaker 1: able to they're able to use to triangulate to figure 214 00:13:40,800 --> 00:13:44,480 Speaker 1: out who owns a wallet because they can follow the 215 00:13:44,559 --> 00:13:49,120 Speaker 1: movement of crypto across the blockchain in ways that people 216 00:13:49,320 --> 00:13:53,320 Speaker 1: can't do it um who have only public access. And 217 00:13:53,640 --> 00:13:58,240 Speaker 1: they also work with firms like Analysis, which um Ellen 218 00:13:58,320 --> 00:14:02,520 Speaker 1: had mentioned, to help them put together who owns, you know, 219 00:14:02,960 --> 00:14:06,680 Speaker 1: disputed wallets. And I would also say that the government 220 00:14:07,080 --> 00:14:11,320 Speaker 1: is looking to privatize the storage and sale of seized 221 00:14:11,360 --> 00:14:15,199 Speaker 1: crypto assets. The Justice Department, through the Marshals has had 222 00:14:15,280 --> 00:14:18,959 Speaker 1: sort of mixed success with that. Marshals used to auction 223 00:14:19,080 --> 00:14:22,840 Speaker 1: crypto themselves and they stopped in They were trying to 224 00:14:22,920 --> 00:14:26,080 Speaker 1: hire an outside firm and the two firms that they 225 00:14:26,080 --> 00:14:29,240 Speaker 1: had settled on both were disqualified because they were too 226 00:14:29,240 --> 00:14:33,880 Speaker 1: big under the the regulations, and so the marshals are 227 00:14:33,920 --> 00:14:36,960 Speaker 1: doing it themselves, but they're looking for a firm outside 228 00:14:37,000 --> 00:14:42,120 Speaker 1: to do it for them. And Ellen. This is related 229 00:14:42,240 --> 00:14:44,640 Speaker 1: to the third parts of that complex tree, right, which 230 00:14:44,680 --> 00:14:48,080 Speaker 1: is the distribution once some sources of judgment has been 231 00:14:48,120 --> 00:14:52,920 Speaker 1: rendered on on either the crypto or the alleged criminal involved. Yeah, 232 00:14:52,960 --> 00:14:56,640 Speaker 1: this is almost the most complicated part because there was 233 00:14:56,680 --> 00:15:01,120 Speaker 1: no legal preston for for this and what a court 234 00:15:01,200 --> 00:15:05,840 Speaker 1: does when, for example, it finds someone guilty, there's a 235 00:15:05,880 --> 00:15:10,400 Speaker 1: forfeit tire proceeding um that happens later on and often 236 00:15:10,440 --> 00:15:16,640 Speaker 1: this happens years after um. And what's the forfeits proceeding um. 237 00:15:16,720 --> 00:15:20,000 Speaker 1: In the UK you have the Proceeds of Crime Act 238 00:15:20,160 --> 00:15:23,640 Speaker 1: and this is a twenty year old act. And at 239 00:15:23,640 --> 00:15:27,400 Speaker 1: the end of the case, when someone's found guilty and 240 00:15:27,440 --> 00:15:31,520 Speaker 1: sent to jail within a year, there's usually a court 241 00:15:31,560 --> 00:15:35,640 Speaker 1: hearing where judge will decide the seat what to do 242 00:15:35,680 --> 00:15:38,720 Speaker 1: with the seased assets, whether the criminal can keep some 243 00:15:38,800 --> 00:15:44,360 Speaker 1: of them, whether they forfeit them um and also how 244 00:15:44,600 --> 00:15:46,720 Speaker 1: whether they stay with the state, whether they have to 245 00:15:46,720 --> 00:15:51,640 Speaker 1: be distributed to victims. For example, the trouble that this 246 00:15:52,120 --> 00:15:54,880 Speaker 1: police force had in the case I was talking about 247 00:15:54,920 --> 00:15:58,640 Speaker 1: earlier was this law was twenty years old when crypto 248 00:15:58,680 --> 00:16:01,400 Speaker 1: didn't exist, So they had to go to a judge 249 00:16:01,400 --> 00:16:06,000 Speaker 1: and convince them that this is an asset. The most 250 00:16:06,160 --> 00:16:09,920 Speaker 1: valuable asset in the case it was. They came across 251 00:16:09,960 --> 00:16:14,960 Speaker 1: cash about two d grand in cash, watches, artwork, gold, 252 00:16:15,040 --> 00:16:19,000 Speaker 1: but the crypto was the most valuable asset. The other complication, 253 00:16:19,080 --> 00:16:22,160 Speaker 1: and we've seen that even more so, is that crypto 254 00:16:22,200 --> 00:16:24,280 Speaker 1: will be a much different price than it was when 255 00:16:24,320 --> 00:16:26,600 Speaker 1: they seized it. And and and the good thing that 256 00:16:26,960 --> 00:16:30,320 Speaker 1: police have had up until this year was it ballooned 257 00:16:30,320 --> 00:16:34,480 Speaker 1: in price, so either the state or victims got quite 258 00:16:34,480 --> 00:16:36,560 Speaker 1: a good deal out of it. And I think what 259 00:16:36,680 --> 00:16:40,680 Speaker 1: police are now really grappling with is actually that that 260 00:16:40,800 --> 00:16:44,240 Speaker 1: crypto that they've been storing for so long has actually 261 00:16:44,240 --> 00:16:48,080 Speaker 1: fallen in price now quite a lot, what actually quite 262 00:16:48,080 --> 00:16:50,960 Speaker 1: a lot? And at what point do they sell it? 263 00:16:51,640 --> 00:16:54,560 Speaker 1: They're confined by the law, but at what point do 264 00:16:54,640 --> 00:16:58,800 Speaker 1: they convert that. Do they convert it before they forfeit 265 00:16:58,880 --> 00:17:02,960 Speaker 1: to its. It's really complicated and it's really those kinds 266 00:17:02,960 --> 00:17:05,240 Speaker 1: of questions are actually outside the law, and it's about 267 00:17:05,320 --> 00:17:09,520 Speaker 1: instinct or missed And David, is it similar in the US? 268 00:17:09,560 --> 00:17:14,159 Speaker 1: In the US, assets can be forfeited when someone is 269 00:17:14,200 --> 00:17:18,639 Speaker 1: convicted of a crime, but they're seized before someone is 270 00:17:18,640 --> 00:17:20,840 Speaker 1: convicted of a crime, so they may sit there for 271 00:17:20,880 --> 00:17:24,639 Speaker 1: a year or two, three, four years while someone is 272 00:17:24,720 --> 00:17:29,600 Speaker 1: going through the judicial process. And uh, the government cannot 273 00:17:30,040 --> 00:17:34,480 Speaker 1: sell those crypto assets until after there's an order from 274 00:17:34,520 --> 00:17:38,080 Speaker 1: the judge saying it's okay to UM to liquidate this. 275 00:17:38,600 --> 00:17:40,800 Speaker 1: I was going to say, there's an interesting case in 276 00:17:40,960 --> 00:17:46,639 Speaker 1: San Francisco where someone stole sixty nine thousand, three hundred 277 00:17:46,720 --> 00:17:50,919 Speaker 1: seventy bitcoin from the Silk Road site in November of 278 00:17:51,920 --> 00:17:54,119 Speaker 1: It was worth a billion dollars that then went up 279 00:17:54,160 --> 00:17:56,680 Speaker 1: a great deal more than that, and it's fallen since then. 280 00:17:57,359 --> 00:18:00,800 Speaker 1: But there's someone referred to only as individual X who 281 00:18:00,960 --> 00:18:04,919 Speaker 1: agreed to forfeit it, and so he's not he or 282 00:18:05,000 --> 00:18:09,320 Speaker 1: she is not contesting ownership UM. But there are a 283 00:18:09,359 --> 00:18:12,920 Speaker 1: bunch of other people who are putting claims in saying, well, 284 00:18:12,960 --> 00:18:16,800 Speaker 1: they had some of the crypto that was in dispute, 285 00:18:16,920 --> 00:18:21,919 Speaker 1: and um, so the judge in San Francisco is ruling 286 00:18:21,960 --> 00:18:26,640 Speaker 1: on that dispute and he's hearing testimony and reading reports 287 00:18:26,680 --> 00:18:30,760 Speaker 1: from experts on both sides, and in every case so 288 00:18:30,800 --> 00:18:34,080 Speaker 1: far he's ruled for the government, and a couple of 289 00:18:34,119 --> 00:18:36,960 Speaker 1: the people who say that, um, some of that crypto 290 00:18:37,080 --> 00:18:40,880 Speaker 1: is there's have appealed it and the so it has 291 00:18:40,920 --> 00:18:45,040 Speaker 1: to be adjudicated at the district court level and the 292 00:18:45,040 --> 00:18:47,680 Speaker 1: appellate court level before they can go ahead and sell 293 00:18:48,200 --> 00:18:51,000 Speaker 1: all of that crypto, which is very valuable. And it 294 00:18:51,040 --> 00:18:53,639 Speaker 1: sounds like it's going to take a long time. It's 295 00:18:53,800 --> 00:18:56,920 Speaker 1: has taken almost two years so far. It probably take 296 00:18:57,160 --> 00:19:00,199 Speaker 1: I would guess another year or so, but then I 297 00:19:00,200 --> 00:19:04,119 Speaker 1: assume they're going to go ahead and sell it. Wow. Well, 298 00:19:04,160 --> 00:19:09,120 Speaker 1: thank you both for joining us on this frankly fascinating episode. 299 00:19:09,119 --> 00:19:11,600 Speaker 1: I really appreciate you both taking the time. Thank you 300 00:19:11,680 --> 00:19:15,720 Speaker 1: so much. Thank you Ellen, and thank you David. You 301 00:19:15,760 --> 00:19:18,159 Speaker 1: can find more of their reporting on the Bloomberg Terminal, 302 00:19:18,280 --> 00:19:21,880 Speaker 1: on Bloomberg dot com and on Twitter. Ellen is at 303 00:19:22,000 --> 00:19:25,280 Speaker 1: Ellen A. Milligan. That's M I L L I G. 304 00:19:25,520 --> 00:19:30,080 Speaker 1: A N and David is at David vorriacos. That's David 305 00:19:30,440 --> 00:19:36,720 Speaker 1: V O R E A c O S. On the 306 00:19:36,760 --> 00:19:40,200 Speaker 1: next episode of Bloomberg Crypto. One of the most interesting 307 00:19:40,240 --> 00:19:43,800 Speaker 1: conversations in crypto right now is all about definitions, and 308 00:19:44,000 --> 00:19:47,600 Speaker 1: especially the definition of a so called security Who betters 309 00:19:47,600 --> 00:19:50,600 Speaker 1: to tackle this than Bloomberg ompainion columnist Matt Levine, a 310 00:19:50,640 --> 00:19:54,520 Speaker 1: former practicing lawyer and investment banker who has written extensively 311 00:19:54,720 --> 00:19:59,160 Speaker 1: about securities, securities law, inside of training, all the things 312 00:19:59,160 --> 00:20:01,720 Speaker 1: that are very much top goal right now. You'll also 313 00:20:01,760 --> 00:20:04,600 Speaker 1: hear highlights from Matt's interview Sam bankmun Freed at the 314 00:20:04,640 --> 00:20:13,320 Speaker 1: recent Bloomberg Crypto swmach in New York. This is Bloomberg Crypto, 315 00:20:13,560 --> 00:20:16,840 Speaker 1: a daily podcast from Bloomberg and I Heart Radio. For 316 00:20:16,920 --> 00:20:19,160 Speaker 1: more shows from I Heart Radio, visit the i Heart 317 00:20:19,240 --> 00:20:22,960 Speaker 1: Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. 318 00:20:23,760 --> 00:20:26,320 Speaker 1: Send us your comments, questions or suggestions for the show 319 00:20:26,480 --> 00:20:29,760 Speaker 1: to Crypto at Bloomberg dot next, or find us on Twitter. 320 00:20:30,000 --> 00:20:37,200 Speaker 1: We're at Crypto. The supervising producer of Bloomberg Crypto is 321 00:20:37,240 --> 00:20:41,080 Speaker 1: Vicky ver Galina. Our senior producer is Janet babin Our 322 00:20:41,119 --> 00:20:45,320 Speaker 1: producer is Sharon Burriro. Our associate producers Ozanam Siddiki and 323 00:20:45,359 --> 00:20:49,240 Speaker 1: Moses and m Desta wonder At is our engineer. Original 324 00:20:49,320 --> 00:20:54,760 Speaker 1: music by Leo Sidrn. I'm Stacy Maria Shmo. We'll be 325 00:20:54,760 --> 00:21:06,399 Speaker 1: back tomorrow. The expect the propection about the APT sting 326 00:21:06,760 --> 00:21:07,520 Speaker 1: the st