WEBVTT - The Unfair Coach

0:00:15.276 --> 0:00:24.876
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin chariots of fire. So where does the power come

0:00:24.956 --> 0:00:32.476
<v Speaker 1>from to see the race to its hand from? If

0:00:32.476 --> 0:00:35.636
<v Speaker 1>you're into watching white guys run, the movie never gets old.

0:00:36.476 --> 0:00:38.316
<v Speaker 1>Even if you're not into that. It has one of

0:00:38.356 --> 0:00:42.516
<v Speaker 1>the best coaching scenes ever filmed. Harold Abraham's a British

0:00:42.556 --> 0:00:45.196
<v Speaker 1>sprinter is about to run thee hundred meter final in

0:00:45.236 --> 0:00:49.636
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen twenty four Olympics. His coach gazes out of

0:00:49.636 --> 0:00:53.436
<v Speaker 1>his hotel room window at the stadium next door. The

0:00:53.476 --> 0:00:58.756
<v Speaker 1>pistol sounds. The coach watches the sky over the stadium.

0:00:58.836 --> 0:01:02.676
<v Speaker 1>Then he spies the British flag rising. That's how the

0:01:02.716 --> 0:01:12.236
<v Speaker 1>coach learns that his runner has won the gold. There's

0:01:12.236 --> 0:01:15.236
<v Speaker 1>a reason the coach isn't inside the stadium watching the race.

0:01:15.916 --> 0:01:20.836
<v Speaker 1>He's been banned because he's a coach. In nineteen twenty four,

0:01:21.156 --> 0:01:24.996
<v Speaker 1>professional coaches are taboo. They're considered a form of cheating

0:01:25.636 --> 0:01:28.396
<v Speaker 1>the steroids of the age. It's aught to do with

0:01:28.476 --> 0:01:31.916
<v Speaker 1>this idea of this emerging gentleman amateur. So you were

0:01:31.916 --> 0:01:35.236
<v Speaker 1>considered a gentleman if you were like upper class born

0:01:35.276 --> 0:01:38.756
<v Speaker 1>into money. Tigan Carpenter George is the co author of

0:01:38.796 --> 0:01:41.236
<v Speaker 1>a book on the history of coaching. It's one of

0:01:41.236 --> 0:01:43.636
<v Speaker 1>those subjects you don't really imagine there being a history

0:01:43.676 --> 0:01:47.156
<v Speaker 1>of what would have been the sports being played in

0:01:47.156 --> 0:01:49.596
<v Speaker 1>the early nineteenth century. So, I mean, the upper classes

0:01:49.636 --> 0:01:54.956
<v Speaker 1>would have been the typical cricket, fencing, rowing was quite

0:01:54.956 --> 0:01:58.956
<v Speaker 1>a good one, Tennis, probably not tennis as we recognize

0:01:58.956 --> 0:02:03.556
<v Speaker 1>it now. So there's a sport called pedestrianism which emerged

0:02:03.596 --> 0:02:08.036
<v Speaker 1>sort of the early eighteen hundreds, basically walking races. They

0:02:08.076 --> 0:02:10.436
<v Speaker 1>were very lower class sports because there was lots of

0:02:10.476 --> 0:02:12.796
<v Speaker 1>wagering and lots of gambling going on in there, and

0:02:12.876 --> 0:02:15.196
<v Speaker 1>the upper classes weren't interested in that. Let me can

0:02:15.276 --> 0:02:17.156
<v Speaker 1>let me stop you for a secon. Yeah, so you're

0:02:17.156 --> 0:02:22.876
<v Speaker 1>saying the lower class sport was pedestrianism. Yeah. So, And actually,

0:02:22.916 --> 0:02:25.396
<v Speaker 1>if you go back to the eighteen hundreds, they had

0:02:25.436 --> 0:02:29.876
<v Speaker 1>stables of pedestrians, which was basically a group of men

0:02:30.756 --> 0:02:34.156
<v Speaker 1>that would travel around the pubs of Britain and they

0:02:34.196 --> 0:02:37.956
<v Speaker 1>would race against each other. Now some of the things

0:02:37.996 --> 0:02:41.276
<v Speaker 1>were ridiculous, so it would be like five day races.

0:02:41.516 --> 0:02:44.476
<v Speaker 1>It would be who can walk a thousand miles in

0:02:44.556 --> 0:02:47.036
<v Speaker 1>the fastest time, and they would get people to wager

0:02:47.076 --> 0:02:50.036
<v Speaker 1>and bet on this there's something really funny about the

0:02:50.116 --> 0:02:54.796
<v Speaker 1>idea of a walking race being pub based. Oh yeah,

0:02:54.596 --> 0:02:56.996
<v Speaker 1>so do they have to walk in a straight line?

0:02:57.316 --> 0:02:59.396
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, No, they had like I mean, there was

0:02:59.436 --> 0:03:05.596
<v Speaker 1>arenas made for this. You know, this was big money.

0:03:07.356 --> 0:03:10.276
<v Speaker 1>She doesn't even notice my attempting a joke to an

0:03:10.396 --> 0:03:14.676
<v Speaker 1>estorian of coaching pedestrians or no, laughing matter. Because they

0:03:14.676 --> 0:03:17.436
<v Speaker 1>were the first athletes to employ coaches. So they had

0:03:17.476 --> 0:03:21.636
<v Speaker 1>specific diets, they had specific routines they were experimenting. They

0:03:21.676 --> 0:03:25.156
<v Speaker 1>were getting their athletes to take god knows what because

0:03:25.156 --> 0:03:27.716
<v Speaker 1>they thought that these concoctions would make them faster, and

0:03:27.956 --> 0:03:29.796
<v Speaker 1>it would be people would come to esteem to watch

0:03:29.876 --> 0:03:32.396
<v Speaker 1>people walk around the track. Yeah, I mean, there was

0:03:32.436 --> 0:03:35.196
<v Speaker 1>all different stuff. So when I say there was walking races,

0:03:35.276 --> 0:03:39.676
<v Speaker 1>but there was ridiculous things like backwards races, like jumping races.

0:03:42.636 --> 0:03:45.636
<v Speaker 1>So coaching begins as an effort to get working class

0:03:45.676 --> 0:03:49.596
<v Speaker 1>people to backpedal faster, but in the middle and upper classes,

0:03:49.876 --> 0:03:52.836
<v Speaker 1>coaching just wasn't done. There was a belief, kind of

0:03:52.876 --> 0:03:56.076
<v Speaker 1>in the early nineteen hundreds that the middle and upper

0:03:56.116 --> 0:04:00.396
<v Speaker 1>class body was superior to the lower class body. Therefore,

0:04:00.476 --> 0:04:03.756
<v Speaker 1>if it was superior, it didn't require any sort of

0:04:03.836 --> 0:04:07.436
<v Speaker 1>coaching or training because it was superior, so they could

0:04:07.436 --> 0:04:10.916
<v Speaker 1>achieve what they wanted to achieve. But without this sort

0:04:10.916 --> 0:04:14.756
<v Speaker 1>of interference. I think it was seen as interference from

0:04:14.796 --> 0:04:18.316
<v Speaker 1>coaching because that was what the lower classes did. By

0:04:18.356 --> 0:04:21.436
<v Speaker 1>the time the British elite finally started to embrace coaching,

0:04:21.956 --> 0:04:24.356
<v Speaker 1>it was less a change of sentiment than an act

0:04:24.396 --> 0:04:27.196
<v Speaker 1>of desperation. We did alright at the nineteen o eight

0:04:27.236 --> 0:04:31.556
<v Speaker 1>Olympics because we created the program. So when you've got

0:04:31.596 --> 0:04:34.596
<v Speaker 1>things like tug of war a model boat racing, you

0:04:34.636 --> 0:04:39.596
<v Speaker 1>know we did all right because we created that program.

0:04:39.756 --> 0:04:42.716
<v Speaker 1>But once we started to compete against other nations, so

0:04:42.836 --> 0:04:47.556
<v Speaker 1>particularly sort of nineteen fifty two, after Helsinki nineteen forty eight,

0:04:47.596 --> 0:04:52.156
<v Speaker 1>the other London Olympics, there's a real cool for something

0:04:52.276 --> 0:04:55.636
<v Speaker 1>used to change. The British were basically losing it everything

0:04:55.676 --> 0:04:59.796
<v Speaker 1>by the nineteen fifties. They hired coaches to fix the problem.

0:04:59.956 --> 0:05:02.796
<v Speaker 1>One coach was appointed to improve the training of athletes

0:05:02.836 --> 0:05:06.236
<v Speaker 1>in the entire country. Part of his contract was that

0:05:06.356 --> 0:05:09.636
<v Speaker 1>for ten pound a week, so probably about seven dollars

0:05:09.636 --> 0:05:14.516
<v Speaker 1>a week, he could be rented out to Cambridge University. However,

0:05:14.716 --> 0:05:17.676
<v Speaker 1>if he was rented out to Cambridge University. He was

0:05:17.756 --> 0:05:20.676
<v Speaker 1>told that he had to use the service entrance to

0:05:21.036 --> 0:05:24.356
<v Speaker 1>enter the university because he was not considered a member

0:05:24.396 --> 0:05:26.876
<v Speaker 1>of staff, and that he could only speak to the

0:05:26.876 --> 0:05:29.916
<v Speaker 1>athletes if they spoke to him first. This was the

0:05:29.916 --> 0:05:32.836
<v Speaker 1>British idea about coaches, that there were a form of

0:05:32.916 --> 0:05:38.076
<v Speaker 1>cheating or a sign of natural inferiority. The notion was

0:05:38.116 --> 0:05:41.996
<v Speaker 1>so highly transmissible that it in effected Harold Abrahams himself,

0:05:42.796 --> 0:05:45.516
<v Speaker 1>the same runner who in Chariots of Fire had hired

0:05:45.516 --> 0:05:48.636
<v Speaker 1>a coach to help him win the gold medal. After

0:05:48.636 --> 0:05:51.916
<v Speaker 1>Abraham's running career ended, he was put in charge of

0:05:52.036 --> 0:05:55.076
<v Speaker 1>all of British amateur sports. So he was happy to

0:05:55.116 --> 0:05:58.076
<v Speaker 1>employ a coach and use a coach all the time.

0:05:58.116 --> 0:06:00.836
<v Speaker 1>It got him further in sport. But when he was

0:06:00.876 --> 0:06:03.076
<v Speaker 1>on the other side of it, he then kind of

0:06:03.076 --> 0:06:06.276
<v Speaker 1>reverted to his amateur principles in the sense of we

0:06:07.116 --> 0:06:10.396
<v Speaker 1>don't like coaches, We control coach, which they know the

0:06:10.516 --> 0:06:14.516
<v Speaker 1>place the administrators are in charge, the coaches are their servants.

0:06:14.556 --> 0:06:18.236
<v Speaker 1>That's what they used to refer to them as. Now

0:06:18.276 --> 0:06:21.716
<v Speaker 1>I can see why some aristocrat might find coaching distasteful.

0:06:22.556 --> 0:06:25.636
<v Speaker 1>People born on top always want for everyone else to

0:06:25.716 --> 0:06:28.316
<v Speaker 1>just stay in their places. One way to do it

0:06:28.356 --> 0:06:30.156
<v Speaker 1>is to make fun of people who try too hard

0:06:30.876 --> 0:06:33.636
<v Speaker 1>and ban any edge that might help them to compete.

0:06:34.796 --> 0:06:38.956
<v Speaker 1>But the old aristocracy is dead. Now everybody thinks it's

0:06:38.996 --> 0:06:43.796
<v Speaker 1>good to try. Everybody competes, and the people who take

0:06:43.836 --> 0:06:53.076
<v Speaker 1>their coaching most seriously the aristocrats. I'm Michael Lewis, and

0:06:53.236 --> 0:06:57.396
<v Speaker 1>this is Against the Rules, a show about various authority

0:06:57.436 --> 0:07:01.596
<v Speaker 1>figures in American life. This season's about the rise of coaches.

0:07:02.076 --> 0:07:04.396
<v Speaker 1>This episode is about what happens when the edge that

0:07:04.476 --> 0:07:07.636
<v Speaker 1>coaching gives you starts to feel a bit more like cheating.

0:07:29.396 --> 0:07:32.316
<v Speaker 1>Earlier this season, we heard about the way science had

0:07:32.316 --> 0:07:36.516
<v Speaker 1>transformed the coaching of pro baseball players, and not just them,

0:07:36.516 --> 0:07:40.276
<v Speaker 1>but athletes of all kinds. Baseball was just the cleanest

0:07:40.316 --> 0:07:43.796
<v Speaker 1>case study of how good players could be transformed into

0:07:43.836 --> 0:07:46.796
<v Speaker 1>great ones. It's all described in a book called The

0:07:46.916 --> 0:07:50.156
<v Speaker 1>MVP Machine, which talks about the teams that led the way.

0:07:50.436 --> 0:07:53.676
<v Speaker 1>The Astros were really the first team that fully embraced it,

0:07:53.756 --> 0:07:58.956
<v Speaker 1>that invested more heavily in the technology. And we're really

0:07:58.956 --> 0:08:02.276
<v Speaker 1>pretty ruthless when it came to cleaning house and saying

0:08:02.316 --> 0:08:05.156
<v Speaker 1>we're going to bring in people who are receptive to

0:08:05.356 --> 0:08:08.916
<v Speaker 1>these new ideas, and we're not going to give undue

0:08:08.916 --> 0:08:12.876
<v Speaker 1>doubt friends to tradition and experience. This is Ben Lindbergh.

0:08:13.356 --> 0:08:16.476
<v Speaker 1>He's the co author of the MVP machine, at the

0:08:16.516 --> 0:08:19.956
<v Speaker 1>center of which sits the Houston Astros. The Astros have

0:08:20.156 --> 0:08:23.956
<v Speaker 1>been really cutthroat in all kinds of ways. They've looked

0:08:23.956 --> 0:08:32.316
<v Speaker 1>for advantages that other teams were wary of. Back in

0:08:32.396 --> 0:08:36.276
<v Speaker 1>twenty twelve, the Astros hired a new general manager named

0:08:36.316 --> 0:08:39.116
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Lunow. He was one of the new wave of

0:08:39.196 --> 0:08:43.756
<v Speaker 1>moneyball guys changing baseball, and maybe even more fanatical about

0:08:43.876 --> 0:08:47.116
<v Speaker 1>data than the original moneyball guys. He had been a

0:08:47.196 --> 0:08:50.316
<v Speaker 1>data geek and consultant in Mackenzie but went on to

0:08:50.356 --> 0:08:53.956
<v Speaker 1>help run the Saint Louis Cardinals, and when lu Now

0:08:54.036 --> 0:08:58.636
<v Speaker 1>came to the Astros, he brought science and technology with him.

0:08:58.796 --> 0:09:02.436
<v Speaker 1>The astros new coaches could do things like turn a tiny,

0:09:02.636 --> 0:09:05.876
<v Speaker 1>light hitting second baseman named Jose Altuve into a home

0:09:05.996 --> 0:09:10.996
<v Speaker 1>run hitting league MVP. They turned several average pitchers into stars.

0:09:15.316 --> 0:09:19.996
<v Speaker 1>In May twenty seventeen, the Astro's bench coach Alex Cora

0:09:20.796 --> 0:09:24.716
<v Speaker 1>was working with the Astro's most famous player, Carlos Beltran.

0:09:25.396 --> 0:09:28.836
<v Speaker 1>Beltran was in decline. He was forty years old and

0:09:28.876 --> 0:09:31.676
<v Speaker 1>had been in the big leagues for twenty years now.

0:09:31.716 --> 0:09:35.836
<v Speaker 1>He was struggling to hit. Desperate for help, any kind

0:09:35.876 --> 0:09:42.876
<v Speaker 1>of edge, The Astros coach suggests, how about we use

0:09:42.956 --> 0:09:46.676
<v Speaker 1>this technology we already have, but to steal the opposing

0:09:46.756 --> 0:09:51.676
<v Speaker 1>catcher's signs, so you know what's coming. Fastball, curveball, slider.

0:09:53.196 --> 0:09:55.956
<v Speaker 1>One thing leads to another, and soon the Astros coaching

0:09:55.996 --> 0:10:00.196
<v Speaker 1>staff has installed a TV monitor beside the dugout. It

0:10:00.276 --> 0:10:03.116
<v Speaker 1>displays nothing but the feed from the center field camera.

0:10:04.756 --> 0:10:08.436
<v Speaker 1>The Astros management has written a software program to decode

0:10:08.516 --> 0:10:11.956
<v Speaker 1>the opposing catchers signs, which they give to the coach.

0:10:12.916 --> 0:10:15.796
<v Speaker 1>The coach helps the players set up a signaling program

0:10:16.716 --> 0:10:19.476
<v Speaker 1>that's an old technology. The Astros in the dugout bang

0:10:19.516 --> 0:10:23.556
<v Speaker 1>on a trash can. No bangs means fastball, one bang

0:10:23.636 --> 0:10:30.116
<v Speaker 1>means curveball, two bangs means slider, and so on. Unlike

0:10:30.116 --> 0:10:33.756
<v Speaker 1>the other hitters in professional baseball, the Astros hitters now

0:10:33.796 --> 0:10:36.516
<v Speaker 1>know what's coming. That year they won the World Series,

0:10:37.316 --> 0:10:39.196
<v Speaker 1>people were calling them one of the greatest teams in

0:10:39.276 --> 0:10:42.716
<v Speaker 1>history and It's a difficult thing to separate because the

0:10:42.716 --> 0:10:47.916
<v Speaker 1>Astros are a very talented team who succeeded in legitimate ways,

0:10:47.956 --> 0:10:51.076
<v Speaker 1>but we're also cheating. It's funny because if you have

0:10:51.116 --> 0:10:55.076
<v Speaker 1>an organization that is succeeding because of its informational advantages,

0:10:55.316 --> 0:10:59.396
<v Speaker 1>because if it's always looking for the informational edge, it

0:10:59.476 --> 0:11:02.716
<v Speaker 1>is just a hop, skip and a jump to let's

0:11:02.756 --> 0:11:07.196
<v Speaker 1>get their signs. Yes, you know, let's use technology to

0:11:07.356 --> 0:11:11.956
<v Speaker 1>actually infiltrate the other organization. Yes. And the camera that

0:11:12.156 --> 0:11:15.316
<v Speaker 1>they were using to relay the signs in real time,

0:11:15.476 --> 0:11:18.196
<v Speaker 1>a camera that was placed in the outfield was actually

0:11:18.276 --> 0:11:22.356
<v Speaker 1>a camera that was installed legally for player development purposes.

0:11:22.996 --> 0:11:25.756
<v Speaker 1>We might never have known how the Astros were using

0:11:25.756 --> 0:11:28.916
<v Speaker 1>their center field camera, but in the fall of two

0:11:28.796 --> 0:11:32.636
<v Speaker 1>thousand and nineteen, a former Astros pitcher told a reporter

0:11:32.716 --> 0:11:35.996
<v Speaker 1>what had been going on. The commissioner of Major League

0:11:35.996 --> 0:11:41.316
<v Speaker 1>Baseball opened an investigation and published its findings. Then all

0:11:41.436 --> 0:11:44.236
<v Speaker 1>hell broke loose. In the words of Major League Baseball

0:11:44.236 --> 0:11:48.156
<v Speaker 1>Commissioner Rob Manfred, the Houston Astros are currently undergoing a

0:11:48.276 --> 0:11:52.716
<v Speaker 1>quote really really thorough investigation into the reports that the

0:11:52.756 --> 0:11:56.516
<v Speaker 1>team used cameras and other technology to steal pitching signs

0:11:56.796 --> 0:11:59.196
<v Speaker 1>from the opposing teams. Now the story, the ESPN was

0:11:59.236 --> 0:12:02.876
<v Speaker 1>on it, Sports Illustrated was on it, The world was

0:12:02.956 --> 0:12:06.036
<v Speaker 1>on it. The Houston Astros went from being the most

0:12:06.156 --> 0:12:10.956
<v Speaker 1>envied team in baseball to social pariahs, booed wherever they went.

0:12:11.596 --> 0:12:14.156
<v Speaker 1>But this was about much more than a team's reputation.

0:12:15.476 --> 0:12:19.076
<v Speaker 1>Could you just describe what happened on August the fourth,

0:12:19.076 --> 0:12:22.876
<v Speaker 1>twenty seventeen. Yeah, In August four, twenty seventeen, Mike was

0:12:22.916 --> 0:12:27.036
<v Speaker 1>brought in in the fourth inning. The first pitcher had struggled.

0:12:27.476 --> 0:12:30.596
<v Speaker 1>This is a guy named Ben Macellis. He's the lawyer

0:12:30.636 --> 0:12:34.436
<v Speaker 1>for former Major League pitcher Mike Bolsinger who's suing the

0:12:34.476 --> 0:12:40.236
<v Speaker 1>Houston Astros. So Mike at that point was a middle reliever.

0:12:40.876 --> 0:12:45.476
<v Speaker 1>He threw twenty nine pitches. Of the twenty nine pitches,

0:12:45.516 --> 0:12:47.756
<v Speaker 1>there were bangs, which indicated that it was going to

0:12:47.836 --> 0:12:50.276
<v Speaker 1>be a breaking ball. The bang was sent from the

0:12:50.356 --> 0:12:53.076
<v Speaker 1>dugout of the Astros by banging on a trash can

0:12:54.196 --> 0:12:56.436
<v Speaker 1>to the batter to signify what pitch was going to

0:12:56.516 --> 0:12:59.436
<v Speaker 1>be thrown. And so there were forty percent of his

0:12:59.516 --> 0:13:02.756
<v Speaker 1>pitches there were bangs on if you're wondering whether a

0:13:02.796 --> 0:13:05.476
<v Speaker 1>big league pitcher has ever before hired a lawyer to

0:13:05.596 --> 0:13:09.796
<v Speaker 1>sue an opposing team for the behavior of their coaches. Well, no,

0:13:10.436 --> 0:13:13.156
<v Speaker 1>this is a first, But then the coaches have never

0:13:13.196 --> 0:13:15.556
<v Speaker 1>been able to generate this kind of edge. It was

0:13:15.596 --> 0:13:18.716
<v Speaker 1>a disastrous outing, and after a performance that was so

0:13:18.756 --> 0:13:22.556
<v Speaker 1>embarrassing like that, the team lost confidence him. Frankly, all

0:13:22.596 --> 0:13:25.636
<v Speaker 1>scouts in the major's lost confidence in him. He was

0:13:25.676 --> 0:13:29.276
<v Speaker 1>demoted to the minor leagues. Played well right after that

0:13:29.316 --> 0:13:32.076
<v Speaker 1>in the miners, but then couldn't find work in the

0:13:32.116 --> 0:13:35.076
<v Speaker 1>majors because he was viewed as having lost his last

0:13:35.076 --> 0:13:38.156
<v Speaker 1>shot that game. And for all Mike knew until recently,

0:13:38.236 --> 0:13:41.156
<v Speaker 1>he just thought he couldn't perform that day. So he

0:13:41.196 --> 0:13:43.516
<v Speaker 1>did in the moment, did he have any sense that

0:13:43.596 --> 0:13:46.876
<v Speaker 1>anything peculiar was going on. He believed that they were

0:13:46.876 --> 0:13:51.756
<v Speaker 1>the greatest team he's ever played against. He was just,

0:13:52.316 --> 0:13:55.196
<v Speaker 1>you know, shocked that day. He would say that it

0:13:55.276 --> 0:13:57.476
<v Speaker 1>seemed that they knew the pitches that he was throwing,

0:13:57.916 --> 0:14:00.396
<v Speaker 1>but he attributed it to their great skill and their

0:14:00.396 --> 0:14:04.076
<v Speaker 1>great determination and being a great team, and that he

0:14:04.156 --> 0:14:11.276
<v Speaker 1>just didn't have what it takes anymore. Mike Bolsinger was,

0:14:11.316 --> 0:14:15.876
<v Speaker 1>in baseball terms, a nobody. The astros were the elites.

0:14:16.836 --> 0:14:18.756
<v Speaker 1>When you're a nobody and you go up against a

0:14:18.756 --> 0:14:21.836
<v Speaker 1>member of the elite and you lose, well, it just

0:14:21.916 --> 0:14:25.956
<v Speaker 1>confirms you're not good enough. You assume you can't compete.

0:14:26.756 --> 0:14:29.676
<v Speaker 1>You never even know that the coach basically rigged the

0:14:29.716 --> 0:14:34.756
<v Speaker 1>game with some software, a camera and a trash candleid.

0:14:35.636 --> 0:14:38.236
<v Speaker 1>The question then is just how many games in life

0:14:38.236 --> 0:14:55.596
<v Speaker 1>can be rigged? So thus the study of how people

0:14:55.796 --> 0:14:58.396
<v Speaker 1>talk is of course, you know, it's as old as

0:14:58.436 --> 0:15:03.756
<v Speaker 1>people basically. Mike Norton, psychologist, professor at the Harvard Business School,

0:15:04.356 --> 0:15:07.556
<v Speaker 1>he's been studying the way people talk and thinking about

0:15:07.556 --> 0:15:09.676
<v Speaker 1>how they might do it better. A lot of the

0:15:09.756 --> 0:15:14.396
<v Speaker 1>research on conversation is kind of about like underlying grammar,

0:15:14.916 --> 0:15:16.916
<v Speaker 1>you know, so it's sort of what are the rules

0:15:16.996 --> 0:15:20.236
<v Speaker 1>of language on how it works and which words come

0:15:20.356 --> 0:15:23.156
<v Speaker 1>where and why in German are they over here? Which

0:15:23.196 --> 0:15:26.236
<v Speaker 1>is totally fascinating. But you could read all of that

0:15:26.316 --> 0:15:29.756
<v Speaker 1>and still have absolutely no idea what you're supposed to

0:15:29.756 --> 0:15:32.076
<v Speaker 1>say to someone when you're meeting them for the first time.

0:15:32.196 --> 0:15:35.836
<v Speaker 1>Like there's no guidance, there's no help for us in

0:15:35.996 --> 0:15:37.836
<v Speaker 1>any of the things that we're trying to get done,

0:15:38.236 --> 0:15:41.996
<v Speaker 1>which is crazy because we talk all day, every day.

0:15:42.036 --> 0:15:47.796
<v Speaker 1>It's the number one thing that we do. We talk,

0:15:48.316 --> 0:15:51.196
<v Speaker 1>but we don't know how to do it effectively. But

0:15:51.316 --> 0:15:55.236
<v Speaker 1>now there are new piles of data, truly massive numbers

0:15:55.236 --> 0:15:58.836
<v Speaker 1>of sales calls, speed dates, Twitter fights, and so on,

0:15:59.676 --> 0:16:02.916
<v Speaker 1>all recorded. I talked about this a little in the

0:16:02.996 --> 0:16:06.836
<v Speaker 1>last episode about social scientists who have new computing tools

0:16:06.876 --> 0:16:11.076
<v Speaker 1>that make it easy for them to see patterns analyze them.

0:16:11.116 --> 0:16:15.036
<v Speaker 1>When you study people's conversation, you discover a funny thing.

0:16:16.156 --> 0:16:18.596
<v Speaker 1>People who are just trying to be liked and respected

0:16:18.876 --> 0:16:22.356
<v Speaker 1>have no clue how to do it. They make all

0:16:22.516 --> 0:16:27.636
<v Speaker 1>kinds of mistakes. Humble bragging, for instance. There's two kinds. Actually,

0:16:27.756 --> 0:16:32.196
<v Speaker 1>there's complaint brags and humble brags. Complaint brags are this

0:16:32.396 --> 0:16:35.956
<v Speaker 1>whenever a celebrity on Twitter or Instagram writes ug dot

0:16:35.956 --> 0:16:39.236
<v Speaker 1>dot dot whatever comes after that as a humble bragg

0:16:39.516 --> 0:16:41.996
<v Speaker 1>to search for it. So they wrote they wrote something

0:16:42.036 --> 0:16:44.676
<v Speaker 1>like ug dot dot dot my hand is so sore

0:16:45.516 --> 0:16:49.956
<v Speaker 1>from signing so many autographs. It was just the best,

0:16:50.716 --> 0:16:54.596
<v Speaker 1>the best. So that's the complaint brag, right, Oh, all,

0:16:54.636 --> 0:16:56.396
<v Speaker 1>I want to do is tell you my hand hurts,

0:16:56.876 --> 0:16:59.436
<v Speaker 1>and then the other thing. And the humble brag is

0:16:59.436 --> 0:17:02.076
<v Speaker 1>the one which is almost more common with celebrities, which

0:17:02.116 --> 0:17:05.476
<v Speaker 1>is the um so honored to be on stage with

0:17:05.556 --> 0:17:10.716
<v Speaker 1>Bono to receive this award. So that's a humble brag.

0:17:11.196 --> 0:17:14.276
<v Speaker 1>Mike Norton set out two years ago to study it scientifically.

0:17:14.996 --> 0:17:19.276
<v Speaker 1>He worked with two other psychologists, Oval Sayser and Francesca Gino.

0:17:20.676 --> 0:17:23.956
<v Speaker 1>They conducted weird experiments, like having a person in a

0:17:23.996 --> 0:17:26.676
<v Speaker 1>coffee shop try to get other people to sign a petition,

0:17:27.196 --> 0:17:30.836
<v Speaker 1>but in some cases sprinkling into her chitchat a humble brag.

0:17:31.636 --> 0:17:35.716
<v Speaker 1>Other times she just bragged. It turned out people were

0:17:35.756 --> 0:17:37.876
<v Speaker 1>more likely to sign the petition if she just bragged.

0:17:39.676 --> 0:17:43.436
<v Speaker 1>Mike and his colleagues call their paper humble bragging a

0:17:43.556 --> 0:17:49.476
<v Speaker 1>distinct and ineffective self presentation strategy. Their case was airtight.

0:17:50.676 --> 0:17:52.836
<v Speaker 1>If you want people to like or respect, you, don't

0:17:52.916 --> 0:17:58.516
<v Speaker 1>humble brag. We don't love people who bragg, but we

0:17:58.636 --> 0:18:00.676
<v Speaker 1>like them more because at least they're being honest, right,

0:18:00.676 --> 0:18:03.596
<v Speaker 1>at least they're just saying I'm awesome. It's these humble

0:18:03.636 --> 0:18:06.276
<v Speaker 1>braggers that are these kind of phony and sincere people

0:18:06.276 --> 0:18:11.956
<v Speaker 1>that really bother us. It's a given how much conversation

0:18:12.036 --> 0:18:16.436
<v Speaker 1>happens that people are pursuing this wily, inefficient strategy. It's

0:18:16.516 --> 0:18:22.196
<v Speaker 1>extraordinary how common bad strategies are. It really is, because

0:18:22.196 --> 0:18:25.076
<v Speaker 1>you'd think if we practice this from the time where two,

0:18:25.636 --> 0:18:28.436
<v Speaker 1>you know, all day every day, we would have figured

0:18:28.476 --> 0:18:31.596
<v Speaker 1>out what works and what doesn't. But part of the

0:18:31.636 --> 0:18:35.036
<v Speaker 1>reason we don't is because people tend to be pretty polite.

0:18:35.836 --> 0:18:38.796
<v Speaker 1>So if you humble brag, I'm very unlikely to call

0:18:38.836 --> 0:18:41.636
<v Speaker 1>you out on it. So you think it worked now.

0:18:41.716 --> 0:18:43.116
<v Speaker 1>Later on, I'm going to go make fun of you

0:18:43.156 --> 0:18:45.316
<v Speaker 1>to other people, but you're not going to know that

0:18:45.356 --> 0:18:48.996
<v Speaker 1>I did that. And that's why we're bad at talking.

0:18:49.116 --> 0:18:51.716
<v Speaker 1>In spite of how important it is and how much

0:18:51.756 --> 0:18:55.716
<v Speaker 1>we do it, we don't get enough direct feedback. A

0:18:55.716 --> 0:18:58.876
<v Speaker 1>handful of researchers now study how people talk and the

0:18:58.956 --> 0:19:03.076
<v Speaker 1>strategies they use to be liked and respected. They've uncovered

0:19:03.116 --> 0:19:06.716
<v Speaker 1>good strategies and some bad ones, and it was probably

0:19:06.876 --> 0:19:10.116
<v Speaker 1>only a matter of time before somebody real all this

0:19:10.236 --> 0:19:14.636
<v Speaker 1>insight could be used to coach people how to talk.

0:19:19.956 --> 0:19:22.956
<v Speaker 1>Most of social life, we're better at perceiving strengths and

0:19:22.996 --> 0:19:27.236
<v Speaker 1>weaknesses and others than executing those same things ourselves. We

0:19:27.356 --> 0:19:30.036
<v Speaker 1>give different advice to other people than we would enact

0:19:30.076 --> 0:19:33.516
<v Speaker 1>ourselves in that same situation. That's why coaches and third

0:19:33.516 --> 0:19:37.476
<v Speaker 1>party observers are so helpful. This is Alison Brooks, another

0:19:37.516 --> 0:19:40.596
<v Speaker 1>psychologist at the Harvard Business School. You heard her at

0:19:40.596 --> 0:19:43.876
<v Speaker 1>the end of the last episode. She just created a

0:19:43.916 --> 0:19:47.116
<v Speaker 1>new class to coach her students. It's called how to

0:19:47.196 --> 0:19:49.156
<v Speaker 1>Talk Good. Her we're not good at taking our own

0:19:49.156 --> 0:19:53.436
<v Speaker 1>observations and applying them to ourselves observations and judgments. Alison

0:19:53.516 --> 0:19:56.196
<v Speaker 1>knew how she wanted to open her class with one

0:19:56.316 --> 0:20:00.796
<v Speaker 1>powerful tool she could hand students to improve their conversational ability,

0:20:01.316 --> 0:20:04.396
<v Speaker 1>topic selection. So we have this paper about that's the

0:20:04.436 --> 0:20:07.716
<v Speaker 1>framework of how people choose topics, and the main empirical

0:20:07.756 --> 0:20:09.516
<v Speaker 1>finding in that paper is that we we have no

0:20:09.596 --> 0:20:12.116
<v Speaker 1>idea what other people want to be talking about. We're

0:20:12.196 --> 0:20:15.556
<v Speaker 1>really bad at reading them and what they're saying. Machines

0:20:15.556 --> 0:20:18.436
<v Speaker 1>are better at it, and we probably think it's basically unknowable.

0:20:18.596 --> 0:20:20.356
<v Speaker 1>That's right. I don't know what's inside there. I don't

0:20:20.396 --> 0:20:22.156
<v Speaker 1>care to know. I don't even if I try it,

0:20:22.196 --> 0:20:24.436
<v Speaker 1>I probably wouldn't know. M all default to what I

0:20:24.476 --> 0:20:26.796
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about. But if you use people's words

0:20:26.796 --> 0:20:29.156
<v Speaker 1>and feed it to a machine, the machine knows way better,

0:20:29.276 --> 0:20:31.236
<v Speaker 1>so it is knowable. It's funny you when you watch

0:20:31.276 --> 0:20:35.556
<v Speaker 1>dinner party conversation. Yeah, average dinner party conversation, the way

0:20:35.556 --> 0:20:39.996
<v Speaker 1>it ends up defaulting to less than optimal topics. Yes,

0:20:40.476 --> 0:20:43.756
<v Speaker 1>if you empower people to switch topics more frequently, the

0:20:43.796 --> 0:20:46.516
<v Speaker 1>conversation is much more interesting. It's just you need to

0:20:46.516 --> 0:20:48.956
<v Speaker 1>feel empowered, like it's okay to switch, and we're all

0:20:48.996 --> 0:20:51.796
<v Speaker 1>on the same page about that, right, Because there are

0:20:51.836 --> 0:20:54.556
<v Speaker 1>very obvious cues when a topic stagnates. There's much more

0:20:54.636 --> 0:20:57.676
<v Speaker 1>mutual silence, there's uncomfortable laughter. Is we capture this in

0:20:57.716 --> 0:21:00.756
<v Speaker 1>the data, That bad dinner party moment has become a

0:21:00.756 --> 0:21:04.436
<v Speaker 1>subject of scientific inquiry, just like humble bragging. What we

0:21:04.476 --> 0:21:06.756
<v Speaker 1>have found in our data is that people who are

0:21:06.796 --> 0:21:09.996
<v Speaker 1>more aware of what the topic is any given moment,

0:21:10.116 --> 0:21:12.916
<v Speaker 1>and some people come into every conversation sort of with

0:21:12.996 --> 0:21:16.076
<v Speaker 1>ideas already about what they might talk about with any

0:21:16.076 --> 0:21:19.676
<v Speaker 1>given person, and those people tend to be more interesting

0:21:19.676 --> 0:21:24.396
<v Speaker 1>and engaging conversationalist. So topic selection is your first subject,

0:21:24.636 --> 0:21:26.996
<v Speaker 1>that's right, So it's the t of talk t a

0:21:27.316 --> 0:21:32.396
<v Speaker 1>L Kase Allison was explaining to me, which you had planned.

0:21:32.436 --> 0:21:35.676
<v Speaker 1>I found myself thinking, like some old British aristocrat, you

0:21:35.716 --> 0:21:37.316
<v Speaker 1>mean to tell me that we're now not only going

0:21:37.356 --> 0:21:43.236
<v Speaker 1>to coach people, but coach them how to talk. So

0:21:44.196 --> 0:21:48.276
<v Speaker 1>I initially signed up for the class because at times

0:21:48.356 --> 0:21:53.956
<v Speaker 1>I can be a very anxious conversationalist. I am great

0:21:53.996 --> 0:21:57.356
<v Speaker 1>with my friends, but I get really nervous about meeting

0:21:57.396 --> 0:21:59.796
<v Speaker 1>new people, and that kind of leads to a lot

0:21:59.796 --> 0:22:03.596
<v Speaker 1>of nervous ticks when I talk to new folks. Meet

0:22:03.636 --> 0:22:06.916
<v Speaker 1>Bridget Taylor, a student at the Harvard Business School, enrolled

0:22:06.916 --> 0:22:10.036
<v Speaker 1>in the class how to Talk Good, heer like I

0:22:10.076 --> 0:22:13.236
<v Speaker 1>tend to talk way too much. I don't ask enough questions,

0:22:14.116 --> 0:22:17.116
<v Speaker 1>and that just and also knowing that about myself makes

0:22:17.156 --> 0:22:20.116
<v Speaker 1>me even more anxious when I enter new conversations. Let

0:22:20.156 --> 0:22:22.836
<v Speaker 1>me let me stop you. You don't sound like an

0:22:22.876 --> 0:22:27.636
<v Speaker 1>anxious conversationalist. Yeah, sometimes I think maybe it's in my

0:22:27.716 --> 0:22:31.436
<v Speaker 1>head a little bit, But I mean I've definitely gotten

0:22:31.436 --> 0:22:34.556
<v Speaker 1>a lot better at HBS, just by brute force. It's

0:22:34.596 --> 0:22:37.916
<v Speaker 1>such a social school, and you have to meet new

0:22:37.956 --> 0:22:40.116
<v Speaker 1>people all the time, and you're here to get a job,

0:22:40.156 --> 0:22:42.276
<v Speaker 1>so you have to network all the time. But it

0:22:42.356 --> 0:22:45.956
<v Speaker 1>was a really big issue for me before school. Um

0:22:46.636 --> 0:22:49.316
<v Speaker 1>and I used to have to take beta blockers sometimes

0:22:49.356 --> 0:22:51.996
<v Speaker 1>before big meetings or even just a meeting with my

0:22:52.036 --> 0:22:55.836
<v Speaker 1>boss because I would get so nervous. But here, just

0:22:56.196 --> 0:22:58.876
<v Speaker 1>you know, if I would be popping like ten beta

0:22:58.916 --> 0:23:04.596
<v Speaker 1>blockers a day, if I, you know, need needed that outlet.

0:23:04.636 --> 0:23:07.596
<v Speaker 1>So I've just become I've just become more accustom accustomed

0:23:07.636 --> 0:23:10.236
<v Speaker 1>to it. But it's still in my head that I'm nervous.

0:23:10.916 --> 0:23:12.836
<v Speaker 1>Do you think if I came in and a sort

0:23:12.876 --> 0:23:18.636
<v Speaker 1>of objectively evaluated your conversational abilities and compare them to

0:23:18.716 --> 0:23:21.476
<v Speaker 1>other people around you, that I would notice you were deficient?

0:23:23.876 --> 0:23:28.476
<v Speaker 1>Probably not, your conversational abilities might be something you can

0:23:28.516 --> 0:23:32.356
<v Speaker 1>improve upon, I'd be I'm highly dubious of the idea

0:23:32.436 --> 0:23:35.676
<v Speaker 1>that Harvard Business School students aren't already at like the

0:23:35.716 --> 0:23:39.396
<v Speaker 1>top five percent of social skills and conversational skills. They

0:23:39.436 --> 0:23:43.036
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be at the Harvard Business School if they weren't, yeh.

0:23:45.036 --> 0:23:47.156
<v Speaker 1>I talked to a bunch of students and they all

0:23:47.196 --> 0:23:48.996
<v Speaker 1>said they were taking the course because they felt in

0:23:49.076 --> 0:23:52.356
<v Speaker 1>some way inadequate. When it came to conversation. I mean,

0:23:52.396 --> 0:23:55.076
<v Speaker 1>one student in the class is a native Chinese speaker

0:23:55.076 --> 0:23:57.676
<v Speaker 1>who was troubled that she was funnier in Chinese than

0:23:57.676 --> 0:24:00.876
<v Speaker 1>she was in English. She was striving to become funnier

0:24:00.956 --> 0:24:03.516
<v Speaker 1>in a second language. And if that didn't work out,

0:24:03.956 --> 0:24:06.516
<v Speaker 1>there were other tricks on offer in the class we're

0:24:06.596 --> 0:24:10.996
<v Speaker 1>learning about be interested rather than interesting. You can be

0:24:11.076 --> 0:24:15.156
<v Speaker 1>a good listener and ask questions and have a genuine

0:24:15.156 --> 0:24:18.116
<v Speaker 1>curiosity about who you're talking to, and that still makes

0:24:18.116 --> 0:24:21.236
<v Speaker 1>you a really excellent conversationalist. You don't have to have

0:24:21.276 --> 0:24:24.276
<v Speaker 1>the spotlight and be the most interesting person in the room,

0:24:24.316 --> 0:24:28.476
<v Speaker 1>which has kind of been mind blowing for me personally. Now,

0:24:28.556 --> 0:24:31.636
<v Speaker 1>is this a scandal? It's students at the Harvard Business

0:24:31.636 --> 0:24:33.836
<v Speaker 1>School or the first to learn these new data driven

0:24:33.876 --> 0:24:38.556
<v Speaker 1>tricks of conversation. Of course not. That's what Harvard Business

0:24:38.556 --> 0:24:42.676
<v Speaker 1>School does amplify the advantages of people who are already winning.

0:24:43.596 --> 0:24:46.036
<v Speaker 1>I asked Alison Brooks if the course could eventually do

0:24:46.156 --> 0:24:49.316
<v Speaker 1>more than that, if the market didn't matter at all,

0:24:49.716 --> 0:24:53.316
<v Speaker 1>what would be the fantasy about where you would take it? Oh,

0:24:53.396 --> 0:24:57.396
<v Speaker 1>so many directions, I think A few answers. One younger

0:24:57.956 --> 0:25:03.356
<v Speaker 1>so to kids and development right, younger children, particularly underserved populations,

0:25:04.076 --> 0:25:08.676
<v Speaker 1>racially diverse, socioeconomic, gender diverse. These are the skills that

0:25:08.716 --> 0:25:11.916
<v Speaker 1>are would potentially propel people to success in their lives.

0:25:11.916 --> 0:25:14.716
<v Speaker 1>Really right, because the Harvard Business School student does not

0:25:14.836 --> 0:25:17.036
<v Speaker 1>need to figure out how to make his status greater.

0:25:18.756 --> 0:25:22.156
<v Speaker 1>Exactly right. They want to, but they don't need to.

0:25:21.676 --> 0:25:47.876
<v Speaker 1>That's right. Just now, we're living in a moment that

0:25:48.036 --> 0:25:51.996
<v Speaker 1>highlights the power of advantages. If you're young and strong,

0:25:52.316 --> 0:25:54.676
<v Speaker 1>you're more likely to live than if you're old and weak.

0:25:55.796 --> 0:25:59.196
<v Speaker 1>If your company's big and rich, it's more likely to survive.

0:25:59.276 --> 0:26:02.876
<v Speaker 1>And if it's lean and small, if you have a great,

0:26:02.876 --> 0:26:05.316
<v Speaker 1>big home with lots of places to work and play,

0:26:05.916 --> 0:26:08.196
<v Speaker 1>you're less likely to go insane. And if you're jammed

0:26:08.196 --> 0:26:12.316
<v Speaker 1>into some tiny apartment. Whatever advantages you had before the pandemic,

0:26:12.636 --> 0:26:18.876
<v Speaker 1>well those advantages are now amplified. People who get a BA,

0:26:19.316 --> 0:26:23.596
<v Speaker 1>on average, make more money, have more stable lives. Paul

0:26:23.716 --> 0:26:26.196
<v Speaker 1>Tough is the author of a book called The Years

0:26:26.236 --> 0:26:31.156
<v Speaker 1>That Matter Most. It's about college and class mobility in America.

0:26:31.276 --> 0:26:33.996
<v Speaker 1>But there's also increasing evidence that where you go to

0:26:34.036 --> 0:26:38.236
<v Speaker 1>school matters too, and it matters especially for low income students,

0:26:38.276 --> 0:26:40.596
<v Speaker 1>first generation students, if you're the first in your family

0:26:40.636 --> 0:26:43.076
<v Speaker 1>to go to college, where you go actually has a

0:26:43.156 --> 0:26:47.236
<v Speaker 1>really huge effect on your future earnings. But it also

0:26:47.796 --> 0:26:52.756
<v Speaker 1>gives them often their first entree into rich American life

0:26:52.796 --> 0:26:55.956
<v Speaker 1>and to sort of the culture of upper middle class

0:26:55.996 --> 0:27:00.036
<v Speaker 1>and affluent American society. Gives them connections, gives them sort

0:27:00.076 --> 0:27:03.396
<v Speaker 1>of the social capital to understand how the world works.

0:27:04.636 --> 0:27:07.836
<v Speaker 1>Elite colleges, of course know this. They say they want

0:27:07.836 --> 0:27:10.756
<v Speaker 1>more low income students, but Paul found that the most

0:27:10.756 --> 0:27:13.756
<v Speaker 1>selective colleges had more students from the richest one percent

0:27:13.796 --> 0:27:17.956
<v Speaker 1>of Americans than from the entire bottom sixty percent. So

0:27:18.036 --> 0:27:21.636
<v Speaker 1>he went looking for an explanation and found it from

0:27:21.676 --> 0:27:26.116
<v Speaker 1>an SAT coach. It's man named Ned Johnson who runs

0:27:26.116 --> 0:27:28.956
<v Speaker 1>his own company, a very successful company in the Washington,

0:27:29.036 --> 0:27:31.636
<v Speaker 1>DC area called Prep Matters. And what Ned says, and

0:27:31.676 --> 0:27:33.436
<v Speaker 1>I think what a lot of them say, is that

0:27:33.596 --> 0:27:37.116
<v Speaker 1>the test measures your ability to take the test. They

0:27:37.156 --> 0:27:39.716
<v Speaker 1>no longer believe if they ever did that the SAT

0:27:39.876 --> 0:27:44.236
<v Speaker 1>really measures your academic ability or anything deep about you.

0:27:44.316 --> 0:27:46.996
<v Speaker 1>It measures how well you've been trained to take that test,

0:27:47.476 --> 0:27:50.476
<v Speaker 1>and how much does it cost to get that training well?

0:27:50.516 --> 0:27:54.236
<v Speaker 1>It depends. There's a wide variation. Ned is pretty close

0:27:54.236 --> 0:27:56.676
<v Speaker 1>to the top of the financial scale. I think he

0:27:56.756 --> 0:27:59.676
<v Speaker 1>charges four hundred dollars an hour for his students, so

0:27:59.676 --> 0:28:02.476
<v Speaker 1>it's like hiring a lawyer. Yeah, it's huge, it's huge.

0:28:03.316 --> 0:28:07.396
<v Speaker 1>The sat N ACT are the biggest obstacles that poor

0:28:07.476 --> 0:28:10.676
<v Speaker 1>kids have to overcome to get into the elite schools.

0:28:11.396 --> 0:28:14.036
<v Speaker 1>Their grades are as good as the grades of rich kids,

0:28:14.756 --> 0:28:17.636
<v Speaker 1>but their test scores are systematically worse than the scores

0:28:17.636 --> 0:28:19.756
<v Speaker 1>of rich kids. I mean, you know, I've had people

0:28:19.796 --> 0:28:22.076
<v Speaker 1>go up hundreds of points in just a couple of weeks.

0:28:22.116 --> 0:28:25.876
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes that's Ben Paris, who's coached these tests for twenty

0:28:25.916 --> 0:28:30.196
<v Speaker 1>six years, hundreds of points. I've never actually had anybody

0:28:30.276 --> 0:28:33.876
<v Speaker 1>investigated for this, but there are some students where actually

0:28:33.916 --> 0:28:35.436
<v Speaker 1>they did so much better on the second one where

0:28:35.476 --> 0:28:36.836
<v Speaker 1>I was afraid they were going to get called in

0:28:37.436 --> 0:28:42.116
<v Speaker 1>because this school special fishy. Yeah, yes, I mean, you know,

0:28:42.156 --> 0:28:44.116
<v Speaker 1>there there is a couple that I took that were

0:28:44.636 --> 0:28:47.716
<v Speaker 1>that were pro bono cases, and these are just great kids.

0:28:48.196 --> 0:28:50.396
<v Speaker 1>And one of them was coming in at like seven hundred,

0:28:50.596 --> 0:28:54.636
<v Speaker 1>and she was working a part time job, had family responsibilities,

0:28:54.916 --> 0:28:57.836
<v Speaker 1>but she just fundamentally didn't know how the test was

0:28:57.836 --> 0:29:00.316
<v Speaker 1>put together and what they expected. You know, she could

0:29:00.356 --> 0:29:02.436
<v Speaker 1>study all of math, but guess what, not all of

0:29:02.436 --> 0:29:05.236
<v Speaker 1>math is on the test. So by really focusing her

0:29:05.276 --> 0:29:07.436
<v Speaker 1>on what she needed to what was going to get

0:29:07.436 --> 0:29:10.596
<v Speaker 1>her points, and understanding how the questions worked, she went

0:29:10.756 --> 0:29:13.436
<v Speaker 1>up over a thousand and so she went from not

0:29:13.476 --> 0:29:16.396
<v Speaker 1>getting into college or being stuck in remedial classes to

0:29:16.676 --> 0:29:19.876
<v Speaker 1>getting in and then never having to take a remedial class.

0:29:20.196 --> 0:29:21.476
<v Speaker 1>And you know, if I had had more than a

0:29:21.516 --> 0:29:23.076
<v Speaker 1>month with her, who knows how well she could have done.

0:29:27.116 --> 0:29:29.716
<v Speaker 1>That's a thought that Ben Paris had whenever he coached

0:29:29.716 --> 0:29:33.876
<v Speaker 1>poor kids, but it didn't happen often. It was a

0:29:33.996 --> 0:29:37.476
<v Speaker 1>rich kids market. To be a lucrative market, it kind

0:29:37.476 --> 0:29:41.116
<v Speaker 1>of had to be, because if everyone could afford SAT coaching,

0:29:42.036 --> 0:29:45.956
<v Speaker 1>SAT coaching would cease to offer an edge. Everyone would

0:29:45.996 --> 0:29:48.836
<v Speaker 1>just game the test in the same way. That's what

0:29:48.996 --> 0:29:52.356
<v Speaker 1>Paul Tough found too. While it wasn't totally true that

0:29:52.436 --> 0:29:55.596
<v Speaker 1>you can just buy a test score, it wasn't totally

0:29:55.596 --> 0:29:59.316
<v Speaker 1>false either, but he found something else, a sort of

0:29:59.436 --> 0:30:03.276
<v Speaker 1>moral vacuum at the heart of American education. It gets

0:30:03.316 --> 0:30:08.676
<v Speaker 1>noticed mainly when someone from the outside walks in. There

0:30:08.756 --> 0:30:11.476
<v Speaker 1>was this one one young man named Ben Dormus and

0:30:11.596 --> 0:30:15.276
<v Speaker 1>be he was this amazing guy, a senior in high

0:30:15.276 --> 0:30:19.076
<v Speaker 1>school in Washington. This Ben was also from a less

0:30:19.076 --> 0:30:23.156
<v Speaker 1>affluent home. A series of lucky accidents had landed him

0:30:23.156 --> 0:30:26.236
<v Speaker 1>in the office of Ned Johnson, crack test prep coach,

0:30:26.836 --> 0:30:29.676
<v Speaker 1>who agreed to give him SAT coaching for free. So

0:30:29.716 --> 0:30:32.516
<v Speaker 1>he got all of these advantages, and he worked incredibly hard,

0:30:32.596 --> 0:30:36.356
<v Speaker 1>and Ned helped him improve his SAT score on the

0:30:36.396 --> 0:30:39.316
<v Speaker 1>math side by one hundred and something points, and he

0:30:39.556 --> 0:30:43.956
<v Speaker 1>got into Yale. But Yale things got complicated because this

0:30:44.036 --> 0:30:46.916
<v Speaker 1>poor kid couldn't shake the sense that getting into Yale

0:30:47.236 --> 0:30:51.796
<v Speaker 1>involved some underhanded trick. Ben really felt this sense that

0:30:51.836 --> 0:30:55.636
<v Speaker 1>he had been given something that was unfair, and that

0:30:55.716 --> 0:30:58.396
<v Speaker 1>while he appreciated it, he could not stop thinking about

0:30:58.396 --> 0:31:00.596
<v Speaker 1>the people who had been left behind, because he knew

0:31:00.636 --> 0:31:03.156
<v Speaker 1>that he was actually no different than the person that

0:31:03.196 --> 0:31:05.356
<v Speaker 1>he was a few months earlier before he'd gotten all

0:31:05.436 --> 0:31:07.676
<v Speaker 1>this coaching, and that that guy would never have gotten

0:31:07.796 --> 0:31:09.956
<v Speaker 1>to Yale. But this guy who got all this coaching

0:31:10.556 --> 0:31:13.636
<v Speaker 1>did get into Yale. He just keeps thinking about, like,

0:31:13.716 --> 0:31:16.636
<v Speaker 1>what how does that system work? That system that he

0:31:16.716 --> 0:31:20.996
<v Speaker 1>suddenly kind of magically got entree into and how can

0:31:21.036 --> 0:31:22.916
<v Speaker 1>it be more fair? How can it be made to

0:31:22.916 --> 0:31:26.076
<v Speaker 1>be more fair? I'm interested in this story because it

0:31:26.116 --> 0:31:29.356
<v Speaker 1>gets at the great unspoken question. Most of the kids

0:31:29.396 --> 0:31:31.756
<v Speaker 1>who get test coaching never asked the question. They don't

0:31:31.756 --> 0:31:33.596
<v Speaker 1>even think of what they have as an edge, since

0:31:33.636 --> 0:31:36.076
<v Speaker 1>all the other kids they know also have it. But

0:31:36.236 --> 0:31:38.876
<v Speaker 1>coaching is the great force keeping them in the station

0:31:38.956 --> 0:31:42.316
<v Speaker 1>to which they were born and keeping less fortunate kids

0:31:42.356 --> 0:31:48.236
<v Speaker 1>out of it. Arrest warrants issued for forty six people

0:31:48.316 --> 0:31:52.996
<v Speaker 1>around the country, including coaches and wealthy parents like Felicity Huffman,

0:31:53.556 --> 0:31:56.236
<v Speaker 1>we now know that some rich American parents were taking

0:31:56.276 --> 0:31:59.796
<v Speaker 1>the college testing game to its logical conclusion. The star

0:31:59.836 --> 0:32:02.756
<v Speaker 1>of Desperate Housewives so desperate to land her daughter in

0:32:02.836 --> 0:32:06.876
<v Speaker 1>a top school, prosecutors say she paid fifteen thousand dollars

0:32:06.876 --> 0:32:10.756
<v Speaker 1>to Singer to bribe a proctor who would secretly correct

0:32:10.796 --> 0:32:17.156
<v Speaker 1>her answers. If a test isn't measuring much except your

0:32:17.196 --> 0:32:20.116
<v Speaker 1>ability to take it, and you can pay some coach

0:32:20.196 --> 0:32:22.956
<v Speaker 1>to teach you to do that, why not just avoid

0:32:22.996 --> 0:32:25.116
<v Speaker 1>all the bother and pay the coach to take the

0:32:25.116 --> 0:32:28.756
<v Speaker 1>test for you. That kid who got the SAT coaching

0:32:28.796 --> 0:32:32.076
<v Speaker 1>and went to Yale was right to feel uneasy. He'd

0:32:32.156 --> 0:32:34.076
<v Speaker 1>used a coach to help him climb to the top

0:32:34.116 --> 0:32:38.076
<v Speaker 1>of America's Steekas Slope. The only difference between him and

0:32:38.156 --> 0:32:40.996
<v Speaker 1>all the other people on top was that he could

0:32:41.036 --> 0:32:52.076
<v Speaker 1>feel that it was slippery. I'm Michael Lewis. Thanks for

0:32:52.156 --> 0:32:55.196
<v Speaker 1>listening to Against the Rules. Against the Rules is brought

0:32:55.196 --> 0:32:58.956
<v Speaker 1>to you by Pushkin Industries. The show's produced by Audrey

0:32:59.036 --> 0:33:02.996
<v Speaker 1>Dilling and Catherine Girodo, with research assistance from Lydia Jane

0:33:03.076 --> 0:33:07.676
<v Speaker 1>Cott and Zooe Wynn. Our editor is Julia Barton. Mia

0:33:07.756 --> 0:33:11.476
<v Speaker 1>Lobell is our executive producer. Our theme was composed by

0:33:11.596 --> 0:33:15.716
<v Speaker 1>Nick Brittell, with additional scoring by Stellwagen Symphonette. We got

0:33:15.756 --> 0:33:18.636
<v Speaker 1>fact checked by Beth Johnson. Our show was recorded by

0:33:18.676 --> 0:33:22.116
<v Speaker 1>tofur Ruth and Trey Schultz at Northgate Studios in Berkeley,

0:33:22.956 --> 0:33:28.636
<v Speaker 1>as always thanks to Pushkin's founders, Jacob Weisberg and Malcolm Gladwell.

0:33:46.876 --> 0:33:50.916
<v Speaker 1>So my name is Tan Carpin to George, my book

0:33:51.156 --> 0:33:57.436
<v Speaker 1>is Overcoming Amateurism. Amateurism coaching traditions in British spoort. Do

0:33:57.516 --> 0:34:00.636
<v Speaker 1>that one more time so we have it clean I've

0:34:00.636 --> 0:34:03.596
<v Speaker 1>really just forgotten the name of my book, okay, A

0:34:03.676 --> 0:34:06.716
<v Speaker 1>History of Coaching in a History of Sports Coaching in Britain,

0:34:07.796 --> 0:34:11.036
<v Speaker 1>Overcoming Amateurism. Yes, that's very British of you, you that

0:34:11.116 --> 0:34:14.116
<v Speaker 1>you see that you're you spent so little time talking

0:34:14.116 --> 0:34:16.396
<v Speaker 1>about yourself. You can't even remember the name of your book.

0:34:16.436 --> 0:34:18.996
<v Speaker 1>I know, I know the first bit. I know the

0:34:19.036 --> 0:34:21.116
<v Speaker 1>first bit because that was the name of my PhD.

0:34:21.276 --> 0:34:23.956
<v Speaker 1>But the end bit it was, yeah, M so overcoming

0:34:23.956 --> 0:34:28.756
<v Speaker 1>your amateurism. History of Now I forgot naked. Why I

0:34:28.756 --> 0:34:30.836
<v Speaker 1>feel like I just walked into faulty towers? All right?

0:34:30.836 --> 0:34:34.196
<v Speaker 1>Can you let's just just introduce yourself.