WEBVTT - Mexico’s High-Stakes Gamble in Dealing With Trump

0:00:00.320 --> 0:00:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news.

0:00:16.520 --> 0:00:19.439
<v Speaker 2>I'm Stephanie Flanders, head of Government and Economics at Bloomberg,

0:00:19.560 --> 0:00:22.400
<v Speaker 2>and this is trump Anomics, the podcast that looks at

0:00:22.400 --> 0:00:25.640
<v Speaker 2>the economic world of Donald Trump, how he's already shaped

0:00:25.680 --> 0:00:28.319
<v Speaker 2>the global economy, and what on earth is going to

0:00:28.360 --> 0:00:34.159
<v Speaker 2>happen next. Well, this week we're looking at how the

0:00:34.200 --> 0:00:37.240
<v Speaker 2>country with the most to lose from Donald Trump's trade

0:00:37.280 --> 0:00:41.160
<v Speaker 2>wars is trying quietly to win them. In the world

0:00:41.159 --> 0:00:44.000
<v Speaker 2>of Donald Trump, you don't always want to be where

0:00:44.000 --> 0:00:47.000
<v Speaker 2>the action is. As I record this on Tuesday, twenty

0:00:47.000 --> 0:00:50.159
<v Speaker 2>eighth of October, most eyes are on Asia as the

0:00:50.159 --> 0:00:54.240
<v Speaker 2>President tours the region, making deals and headlines wherever he goes,

0:00:54.640 --> 0:00:56.840
<v Speaker 2>and at least as of now, he'll be meeting the

0:00:56.920 --> 0:00:59.800
<v Speaker 2>Chinese president later in the week to seal what is

0:01:00.080 --> 0:01:03.760
<v Speaker 2>already been billed as a great victory in his trade

0:01:03.800 --> 0:01:07.120
<v Speaker 2>war with that country. In fact, it's China who probably

0:01:07.120 --> 0:01:10.200
<v Speaker 2>now has the upper hand in that conversation and future ones.

0:01:10.240 --> 0:01:12.560
<v Speaker 2>And if you want to understand why, just listen to

0:01:12.600 --> 0:01:15.760
<v Speaker 2>the last episode of Trumpnomics with Arthur Kroeber. So instead,

0:01:15.840 --> 0:01:18.080
<v Speaker 2>my focus this week is on a country which has

0:01:18.200 --> 0:01:21.560
<v Speaker 2>largely avoided the headlines since President Trump came back to

0:01:21.600 --> 0:01:24.759
<v Speaker 2>the White House, but as one of America's largest trading partners,

0:01:24.800 --> 0:01:28.600
<v Speaker 2>has arguably even more at stake than China and a

0:01:28.600 --> 0:01:33.040
<v Speaker 2>lot weaker cards. Mexico sends a whopping eighty three percent

0:01:33.120 --> 0:01:36.039
<v Speaker 2>of its exports to the US on some measures, and

0:01:36.120 --> 0:01:39.640
<v Speaker 2>every time the President talks about blanket tariffs on the country,

0:01:40.040 --> 0:01:44.760
<v Speaker 2>its economy shudders. Yet somehow that hasn't happened. There have

0:01:44.800 --> 0:01:48.560
<v Speaker 2>been continual reprieves, and most of the credit goes to

0:01:48.600 --> 0:01:53.720
<v Speaker 2>Mexico's President, Claudia Scheinbaum, now entering her second year. So

0:01:53.920 --> 0:01:59.040
<v Speaker 2>how exactly has Mexico's first female president navigated the Trump

0:01:59.120 --> 0:02:04.240
<v Speaker 2>era so skillfully? And what's at stake in her continuing

0:02:04.280 --> 0:02:07.440
<v Speaker 2>to pull it off? Those are the questions we're answering

0:02:07.520 --> 0:02:11.079
<v Speaker 2>in this episode, And because we're Bloomberg Economics, we've brought numbers.

0:02:11.280 --> 0:02:15.960
<v Speaker 2>By our estimate, the difference for Mexico, for President Chinbaum

0:02:16.120 --> 0:02:19.360
<v Speaker 2>between managing this right and managing it wrong over the

0:02:19.360 --> 0:02:22.600
<v Speaker 2>next few years, we Reckon comes down to more than

0:02:22.760 --> 0:02:27.360
<v Speaker 2>four thousand dollars worth of additional economic growth for every man, woman,

0:02:27.440 --> 0:02:30.720
<v Speaker 2>and child in Mexico between now and twenty thirty. It's

0:02:30.760 --> 0:02:33.560
<v Speaker 2>on the good scenario, Mexico could even end up growing

0:02:33.600 --> 0:02:36.720
<v Speaker 2>faster than the US for the first time since two

0:02:36.760 --> 0:02:40.120
<v Speaker 2>thousand and eight. Probably won't want President Trump to notice that,

0:02:40.440 --> 0:02:42.919
<v Speaker 2>but as we're going to be hearing, that rosy outcome

0:02:43.160 --> 0:02:46.440
<v Speaker 2>is indeed far from guaranteed, So let's get into it.

0:02:46.960 --> 0:02:49.960
<v Speaker 2>Alex Vasquez is one of our economy and government reporters

0:02:49.960 --> 0:02:51.720
<v Speaker 2>in Mexico City joining me now.

0:02:51.800 --> 0:02:54.680
<v Speaker 1>Alex, welcome, thank you, thank you for having me.

0:02:55.040 --> 0:02:58.440
<v Speaker 2>And in New York's Felipe Hernandez, who covers Latin America

0:02:58.480 --> 0:03:01.200
<v Speaker 2>for US at Bloomberg Economy. He's got more than fifteen

0:03:01.240 --> 0:03:04.560
<v Speaker 2>years experience covering Latin America for Bloomberg, but also at

0:03:04.560 --> 0:03:16.160
<v Speaker 2>firms including Banco Santander and Deutsche Bank. I think it's

0:03:16.160 --> 0:03:18.120
<v Speaker 2>the first time for both of you. How has it

0:03:18.160 --> 0:03:20.320
<v Speaker 2>taken me so long? I guess that's another sign that

0:03:20.360 --> 0:03:23.480
<v Speaker 2>Mexico has quite happily been staying out of the headlines

0:03:23.639 --> 0:03:27.960
<v Speaker 2>over the last few months. Alex, remind us where we

0:03:28.040 --> 0:03:31.680
<v Speaker 2>are in the negotiations between the US and Mexico. As

0:03:31.720 --> 0:03:34.760
<v Speaker 2>I mentioned, it seems like no news has been good news.

0:03:35.360 --> 0:03:40.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think shambong has managed to I think the

0:03:40.520 --> 0:03:45.320
<v Speaker 3>big achievement is to stay away of confrontation with Trump.

0:03:45.920 --> 0:03:50.320
<v Speaker 3>She doesn't speak much, and I think that something Trump appreciates,

0:03:51.360 --> 0:03:54.920
<v Speaker 3>and she has given him what he wants. She has

0:03:54.960 --> 0:03:58.880
<v Speaker 3>helped to stop migration by sending the National Guard to

0:03:58.920 --> 0:04:04.080
<v Speaker 3>the border. She has handed the US some important drug

0:04:04.080 --> 0:04:05.280
<v Speaker 3>traffickers that were.

0:04:05.280 --> 0:04:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Jailed in Mexico.

0:04:06.800 --> 0:04:12.040
<v Speaker 3>Right now, Mexico I think is the best country position

0:04:12.160 --> 0:04:16.279
<v Speaker 3>regarding tariff and regarding trade with the US because even

0:04:16.360 --> 0:04:19.560
<v Speaker 3>compared with Canada, which is also part of the US

0:04:19.720 --> 0:04:24.720
<v Speaker 3>Mexico and Canada trade agreement, I think Mexico doesn't have

0:04:24.880 --> 0:04:28.640
<v Speaker 3>like reciprocal tariff. It only has twenty five percent tariff

0:04:28.920 --> 0:04:33.200
<v Speaker 3>related to fentannel trafficking, but most of the Mexican goods

0:04:33.720 --> 0:04:36.560
<v Speaker 3>are free of tariff thanks to the trade deal. So

0:04:36.600 --> 0:04:40.719
<v Speaker 3>she has managed to do pretty well. Canada has higher tariff.

0:04:41.320 --> 0:04:45.120
<v Speaker 3>And she announced in a press conference that we had

0:04:45.320 --> 0:04:49.520
<v Speaker 3>a deadline for November first to race tariff in Mexico,

0:04:49.880 --> 0:04:52.680
<v Speaker 3>and she announced that it was extended again.

0:04:54.600 --> 0:04:58.000
<v Speaker 4>I spoke with President Trump on Saturday, and we are

0:04:58.040 --> 0:04:59.800
<v Speaker 4>going to give it a few more weeks to be

0:04:59.839 --> 0:05:02.640
<v Speaker 4>a able to close the issue that is already very

0:05:02.680 --> 0:05:07.560
<v Speaker 4>advanced regarding the fifty four non tariff barriers. So we

0:05:07.680 --> 0:05:10.599
<v Speaker 4>agree to speak again in a week or so because

0:05:10.640 --> 0:05:14.200
<v Speaker 4>we are practically already closing this issue, because ultimately on

0:05:14.279 --> 0:05:19.400
<v Speaker 4>November one, that deadline closes that we had both set

0:05:19.440 --> 0:05:20.600
<v Speaker 4>for ourselves.

0:05:21.080 --> 0:05:23.680
<v Speaker 3>Trump has mentioned that he has a lot of respect

0:05:23.720 --> 0:05:27.200
<v Speaker 3>for her, and you can tell that when she is

0:05:27.240 --> 0:05:30.320
<v Speaker 3>the one that announces in a press conference that they

0:05:31.400 --> 0:05:34.839
<v Speaker 3>had a phone conversation and they reach a deal to

0:05:34.960 --> 0:05:39.960
<v Speaker 3>continue negotiating, but that means no more tariff. So I

0:05:40.000 --> 0:05:43.400
<v Speaker 3>guess the big win is never engaged in a confrontation

0:05:43.600 --> 0:05:47.680
<v Speaker 3>and she never retaliated with tariff from Mexico. But obviously

0:05:48.120 --> 0:05:50.880
<v Speaker 3>there's a lot at stake because Mexico sends to the

0:05:51.000 --> 0:05:52.880
<v Speaker 3>US more than eighty percent of it.

0:05:52.960 --> 0:05:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Techsp so she has to have a good relationship with Trump.

0:05:57.960 --> 0:05:59.839
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we do tend to think about this and

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:03.280
<v Speaker 2>terms of a sort of balance of power and some

0:06:03.360 --> 0:06:06.359
<v Speaker 2>of the countries, certainly the countries with very little leverage.

0:06:06.400 --> 0:06:08.839
<v Speaker 2>I'm thinking of some African economies and others that are

0:06:08.880 --> 0:06:12.680
<v Speaker 2>facing very high reciprocal tariffs. That does seem to be

0:06:12.800 --> 0:06:18.320
<v Speaker 2>about America sort of using its raw force to impose

0:06:18.360 --> 0:06:21.040
<v Speaker 2>things on other countries. Whereas we pointed out last week

0:06:21.040 --> 0:06:23.479
<v Speaker 2>with China, China has been very good at using the

0:06:23.560 --> 0:06:27.120
<v Speaker 2>leverage it has. It's particularly its control over these key

0:06:27.200 --> 0:06:30.480
<v Speaker 2>parts of the global supply chain, these rare earth magnets.

0:06:30.600 --> 0:06:32.760
<v Speaker 2>If you look at Mexico on the face of it,

0:06:32.880 --> 0:06:35.840
<v Speaker 2>you know it has It's a much smaller economy, has

0:06:35.920 --> 0:06:39.000
<v Speaker 2>much less to bring to the table, and these negotiations,

0:06:39.640 --> 0:06:42.599
<v Speaker 2>you say, she's given him everything he wants, but she

0:06:42.640 --> 0:06:45.000
<v Speaker 2>hasn't given him anything on the trade front, which is

0:06:45.000 --> 0:06:48.120
<v Speaker 2>obviously the most important for Mexico. Are there hidden forces

0:06:48.160 --> 0:06:51.840
<v Speaker 2>that are tipping the balance economically in favor of Mexico

0:06:51.920 --> 0:06:55.760
<v Speaker 2>in these negotiations? How has she managed to have this

0:06:55.960 --> 0:06:58.680
<v Speaker 2>ongoing reprieves where you know we're in China. They had

0:06:58.720 --> 0:06:59.640
<v Speaker 2>to actually threaten all this.

0:06:59.680 --> 0:07:03.599
<v Speaker 3>Other have to get that Mexico is next to the

0:07:03.720 --> 0:07:08.440
<v Speaker 3>US and both economy are highly integrated. Sometimes to make

0:07:08.800 --> 0:07:13.640
<v Speaker 3>a car or even an auto part, the same piece

0:07:13.800 --> 0:07:17.320
<v Speaker 3>goes through the border several times. So I think a

0:07:17.360 --> 0:07:21.880
<v Speaker 3>lot of US companies have operations in Mexico.

0:07:22.200 --> 0:07:24.440
<v Speaker 1>We know the labor force is cheaper here.

0:07:24.840 --> 0:07:29.400
<v Speaker 3>Mexico has a pretty good manufacturing so I think Trump

0:07:29.400 --> 0:07:31.600
<v Speaker 3>has faced a lot of pressure.

0:07:31.600 --> 0:07:34.480
<v Speaker 1>From different interests in the US.

0:07:34.880 --> 0:07:38.920
<v Speaker 3>They pretty much don't want to have bad relationship with

0:07:39.000 --> 0:07:42.680
<v Speaker 3>Mexico because there's a lot of economic interests in Mexico.

0:07:43.160 --> 0:07:45.320
<v Speaker 2>Does she ever talk about that, Does she ever say

0:07:45.600 --> 0:07:50.640
<v Speaker 2>speak directly to these big car manufacturers and others highlight

0:07:50.800 --> 0:07:53.760
<v Speaker 2>the stake orders she just letting them do the talking.

0:07:54.200 --> 0:07:57.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean she always mentions like, we have great

0:07:57.160 --> 0:08:01.520
<v Speaker 3>car manufacturers in Mexico. Even US companies are here for

0:08:01.840 --> 0:08:02.800
<v Speaker 3>general motors.

0:08:03.080 --> 0:08:05.400
<v Speaker 1>They have big plants here in Mexico.

0:08:05.600 --> 0:08:08.760
<v Speaker 3>So it's not that easy to move production to the

0:08:08.880 --> 0:08:11.880
<v Speaker 3>US in four years or in a year. So I

0:08:11.920 --> 0:08:14.600
<v Speaker 3>guess a lot of people in the US know that,

0:08:14.880 --> 0:08:18.400
<v Speaker 3>and that's why he's getting in the pitch. It sounds

0:08:18.440 --> 0:08:20.840
<v Speaker 3>good the companies are coming here and they're living in

0:08:20.840 --> 0:08:23.480
<v Speaker 3>other countries, and we're going to produce more in the US.

0:08:23.880 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 3>But in reality, you need to have factories in Mexico,

0:08:27.120 --> 0:08:30.960
<v Speaker 3>and she knows that. I guess that's her leverage. Even

0:08:31.000 --> 0:08:33.120
<v Speaker 3>if he wants to. It's not that easy to move

0:08:33.160 --> 0:08:36.480
<v Speaker 3>that production to the US in one, two or three

0:08:36.600 --> 0:08:37.360
<v Speaker 3>four years.

0:08:37.960 --> 0:08:40.360
<v Speaker 2>So Philippe, we were quite interested in what was at

0:08:40.400 --> 0:08:44.959
<v Speaker 2>stake for Mexico over the next few years in managing

0:08:45.320 --> 0:08:47.960
<v Speaker 2>to dodge this particular bullet and did get some of

0:08:48.000 --> 0:08:53.480
<v Speaker 2>her other policies right. And you've helped Bloomberg reporters Alex

0:08:53.520 --> 0:08:56.440
<v Speaker 2>and others rise a big piece that's coming out about

0:08:56.480 --> 0:09:00.360
<v Speaker 2>Mexico being at a half trillion dollar crossroads. So talk

0:09:00.440 --> 0:09:02.680
<v Speaker 2>us through a little bit how much is at stake

0:09:02.760 --> 0:09:04.559
<v Speaker 2>for Mexico in the next few years.

0:09:04.800 --> 0:09:09.240
<v Speaker 5>Well, as you mentioned, we started by saying or acknowledging

0:09:09.280 --> 0:09:13.240
<v Speaker 5>that Shane Bound has been forced to deal with two

0:09:13.440 --> 0:09:17.559
<v Speaker 5>very strong forces, one external which is dealing with all

0:09:17.600 --> 0:09:23.040
<v Speaker 5>of Trump's immigration, security, and trade policies, and one which

0:09:23.080 --> 0:09:26.080
<v Speaker 5>is domestic, which is Shane bum having to deal with

0:09:26.360 --> 0:09:29.440
<v Speaker 5>Amulo's legacy and am lost legacy has to do with

0:09:29.640 --> 0:09:31.480
<v Speaker 5>his social programs.

0:09:30.960 --> 0:09:34.160
<v Speaker 2>As a previous the previous president Lorador, who is known as.

0:09:34.080 --> 0:09:37.520
<v Speaker 5>That correct so she has had to deal with what

0:09:37.600 --> 0:09:42.440
<v Speaker 5>he left, which were big social programs and state centric

0:09:42.520 --> 0:09:46.920
<v Speaker 5>economy and a couple of reforms that have concentrated power

0:09:47.120 --> 0:09:51.520
<v Speaker 5>in the executive branch and taking out away some power

0:09:51.720 --> 0:09:56.560
<v Speaker 5>from both Congress and more recently the judiciary power. The

0:09:56.640 --> 0:10:00.920
<v Speaker 5>exercise that we did was look at different scenario about

0:10:01.200 --> 0:10:05.319
<v Speaker 5>where with the Mexican economy would be five years from

0:10:05.400 --> 0:10:11.400
<v Speaker 5>now under different assumptions. One assumption would be a positive

0:10:11.559 --> 0:10:14.520
<v Speaker 5>scenario that would be an a scenario in which Mexico

0:10:14.679 --> 0:10:19.240
<v Speaker 5>manages to avoid higher tariffs on its exports to the

0:10:19.400 --> 0:10:25.600
<v Speaker 5>US and in which President Shambaum implements economic policies that

0:10:25.679 --> 0:10:29.679
<v Speaker 5>are more market friendly than those implemented by her predecessor,

0:10:30.040 --> 0:10:33.880
<v Speaker 5>President Lopez o Dador. And a negative scenario in which

0:10:34.760 --> 0:10:39.160
<v Speaker 5>Mexico ends up with tariffs that are in line with

0:10:39.360 --> 0:10:43.520
<v Speaker 5>those with the reciprocal tariff in post on other countries,

0:10:43.559 --> 0:10:46.920
<v Speaker 5>so that's an reciprocal tariff on ten percent on top

0:10:46.960 --> 0:10:50.640
<v Speaker 5>of the twenty five percent Sentennil related tariff, and in

0:10:50.679 --> 0:10:55.960
<v Speaker 5>which President Shambaum implements domestic economic policies in line with

0:10:56.080 --> 0:11:00.360
<v Speaker 5>those that were implemented during the term of Lopezo or

0:11:00.480 --> 0:11:03.520
<v Speaker 5>in power. And the results that we found is that

0:11:03.760 --> 0:11:06.559
<v Speaker 5>assuming that an average economic growth in the US of

0:11:06.640 --> 0:11:10.240
<v Speaker 5>around two percent over the next five years, Mexico would

0:11:10.240 --> 0:11:13.080
<v Speaker 5>grow by an average two point two percent every year,

0:11:13.240 --> 0:11:17.000
<v Speaker 5>so slightly above US growth that by the end of

0:11:17.040 --> 0:11:20.640
<v Speaker 5>that five year forecast period would imply that Mexico's GDP

0:11:20.720 --> 0:11:24.400
<v Speaker 5>would be roughly four point eight, almost five percentage points

0:11:24.480 --> 0:11:27.640
<v Speaker 5>higher than in their status school a scenario. On the

0:11:27.679 --> 0:11:32.679
<v Speaker 5>other hand, if Mexico winds up with reciprocal tariffs and

0:11:33.240 --> 0:11:37.960
<v Speaker 5>economic policies that are fairly rated as market and friendly,

0:11:38.080 --> 0:11:41.400
<v Speaker 5>then average economic growth over this five year period could

0:11:41.400 --> 0:11:45.520
<v Speaker 5>be close to zero, and Mexico's economy by the year

0:11:45.559 --> 0:11:49.080
<v Speaker 5>of twenty and thirty would be almost six percentage points

0:11:49.160 --> 0:11:50.599
<v Speaker 5>lower than otherwise.

0:11:51.000 --> 0:11:53.559
<v Speaker 2>Basically, it's a choice between going up and going down

0:11:53.880 --> 0:11:56.599
<v Speaker 2>in a very sophisticated economic way, and the difference in

0:11:56.679 --> 0:12:00.680
<v Speaker 2>terms of additional growth is half a trillion dollars we

0:12:00.720 --> 0:12:02.920
<v Speaker 2>should say, I mean, so, although she's managed to avoid

0:12:02.920 --> 0:12:06.000
<v Speaker 2>the headlines, we do still have this uncertainty hanging over

0:12:06.440 --> 0:12:10.440
<v Speaker 2>the economy thanks to these sort of continual reprieves, but

0:12:10.559 --> 0:12:13.040
<v Speaker 2>also the times where the president decides to talk tough.

0:12:13.120 --> 0:12:16.800
<v Speaker 2>If he's still talking about these blanket tariffs, that uncertainty

0:12:17.960 --> 0:12:21.120
<v Speaker 2>must be pretty corrosive for the economy right now. Can't

0:12:21.160 --> 0:12:22.600
<v Speaker 2>carry on in definitely.

0:12:22.240 --> 0:12:25.520
<v Speaker 5>Like this absolutely, And actually when you look at the

0:12:25.559 --> 0:12:30.200
<v Speaker 5>figures for economic activity and the exports so far this year,

0:12:31.080 --> 0:12:34.280
<v Speaker 5>when people think about tariffs, they always think about what

0:12:34.440 --> 0:12:38.040
<v Speaker 5>will happen with trade and exports. When you look at

0:12:38.040 --> 0:12:41.920
<v Speaker 5>the exports numbers so far this year for Mexico, they

0:12:42.000 --> 0:12:47.079
<v Speaker 5>show that despite tariffs the fantany related tariffs imposed by

0:12:47.080 --> 0:12:51.160
<v Speaker 5>the US administration, exports to the US are still growing

0:12:51.280 --> 0:12:54.400
<v Speaker 5>and are still growing at a healthy pace. I would

0:12:54.440 --> 0:12:59.560
<v Speaker 5>say the real big negative impact so far on the

0:12:59.640 --> 0:13:04.640
<v Speaker 5>Mexican economy from tariffs has been on the investment side,

0:13:04.679 --> 0:13:07.800
<v Speaker 5>and that is actually exactly in line with the point

0:13:07.840 --> 0:13:11.440
<v Speaker 5>that you are making, and is the drag from this

0:13:11.760 --> 0:13:16.400
<v Speaker 5>uncertainty about what will happen with trade and tariffs in

0:13:16.440 --> 0:13:20.160
<v Speaker 5>the future, and how that has forced a lot of

0:13:20.240 --> 0:13:23.800
<v Speaker 5>companies that had investment plans in Mexico to put those

0:13:23.840 --> 0:13:27.920
<v Speaker 5>on hold. And there's a lot of companies with projects

0:13:28.400 --> 0:13:31.960
<v Speaker 5>that they are ready to start deploying that have decided

0:13:32.000 --> 0:13:35.559
<v Speaker 5>to just wait and see until they have real clarity

0:13:35.600 --> 0:13:39.120
<v Speaker 5>about what is going to happen in the bilateral relations

0:13:39.200 --> 0:13:44.320
<v Speaker 5>and bilateral trade between the two governments and.

0:13:54.200 --> 0:13:58.040
<v Speaker 2>Felipe. If you just look at the way things have

0:13:58.160 --> 0:14:01.839
<v Speaker 2>gone this year and the way that President Chinbaum has

0:14:01.880 --> 0:14:05.480
<v Speaker 2>managed to navigate this so far, would you say the

0:14:05.520 --> 0:14:08.600
<v Speaker 2>friend shoring model was still alive and you wouldn't count

0:14:08.600 --> 0:14:11.720
<v Speaker 2>it out just on the basis of what actually happened

0:14:11.720 --> 0:14:14.480
<v Speaker 2>this year, as opposed to just the rhetoric of Donald Trump.

0:14:14.600 --> 0:14:17.280
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I would say that there's a big pipeline of

0:14:17.400 --> 0:14:21.560
<v Speaker 5>investment projects, a lot of them that were born under

0:14:21.680 --> 0:14:25.440
<v Speaker 5>the mere shoring boom and all of the expectations about

0:14:25.440 --> 0:14:28.840
<v Speaker 5>how Mexico could benefit from these There's a lot of

0:14:28.880 --> 0:14:32.480
<v Speaker 5>these projects that are now on hold. I would say

0:14:32.880 --> 0:14:35.880
<v Speaker 5>that they are still on hold. They have not been

0:14:36.120 --> 0:14:41.640
<v Speaker 5>completely ruled out. And basically what many of the companies

0:14:41.640 --> 0:14:44.320
<v Speaker 5>that have these projects are waiting is for some clarity

0:14:44.840 --> 0:14:47.440
<v Speaker 5>regarding what is going to happen going forward in the

0:14:47.480 --> 0:14:50.880
<v Speaker 5>bilateral relations between Mexico and the US. As soon as

0:14:50.960 --> 0:14:53.880
<v Speaker 5>they have some clarity about that, they will make a

0:14:53.920 --> 0:14:57.280
<v Speaker 5>decision if they want to go ahead with these projects

0:14:57.400 --> 0:15:00.000
<v Speaker 5>or not. And I would say that going to ahea

0:15:00.080 --> 0:15:04.120
<v Speaker 5>head with these projects doesn't necessarily imply that Mexico will

0:15:04.120 --> 0:15:08.440
<v Speaker 5>not face some tariffs on their exports to the US.

0:15:09.120 --> 0:15:11.800
<v Speaker 5>There's a lot of projects that as long as Mexico

0:15:11.960 --> 0:15:16.240
<v Speaker 5>has more attractive tariffs than the rest of the world,

0:15:16.360 --> 0:15:21.200
<v Speaker 5>including Canada, will imply that maybe Mexico will end up

0:15:21.240 --> 0:15:24.840
<v Speaker 5>seeing the influence and the investment flows tied to those

0:15:24.920 --> 0:15:28.960
<v Speaker 5>projects as long, of course, as those tariffs also leave

0:15:29.080 --> 0:15:32.480
<v Speaker 5>Mexico in a position where it makes more sense for

0:15:32.520 --> 0:15:35.760
<v Speaker 5>the companies to invest in Mexico than in the US.

0:15:36.240 --> 0:15:41.440
<v Speaker 5>But given the differences in costs mainly labor costs, but

0:15:41.640 --> 0:15:45.080
<v Speaker 5>other costs as well, these are some projects that I

0:15:45.120 --> 0:15:48.680
<v Speaker 5>would say are still viable even with some tariffs in place,

0:15:49.240 --> 0:15:51.960
<v Speaker 5>which I think it's likely to be the final outcome

0:15:52.000 --> 0:15:55.080
<v Speaker 5>of all of these. But to answer your question, it

0:15:55.240 --> 0:15:58.760
<v Speaker 5>means that, yes, Mexico is in a position where a

0:15:58.800 --> 0:16:02.200
<v Speaker 5>lot of these near shoring projects would still be developed.

0:16:02.640 --> 0:16:05.720
<v Speaker 2>Alex I'm interested in how this is going down with

0:16:05.960 --> 0:16:10.200
<v Speaker 2>the Mexican public because President Scheinbam's got another five five

0:16:10.200 --> 0:16:14.320
<v Speaker 2>more years, so she's got a while. But you started

0:16:14.360 --> 0:16:18.040
<v Speaker 2>the podcast by saying she's given the president everything he wants.

0:16:18.120 --> 0:16:21.280
<v Speaker 2>Is there a perception that she's played this well or

0:16:21.320 --> 0:16:24.040
<v Speaker 2>that has been to quiet and meek with regard to

0:16:24.080 --> 0:16:26.239
<v Speaker 2>the president house her popularity.

0:16:26.560 --> 0:16:30.160
<v Speaker 3>She's entering her second year and she remains highly popular.

0:16:30.520 --> 0:16:35.680
<v Speaker 3>She has more than seventy percent of approval ratings. Sometimes,

0:16:35.840 --> 0:16:40.280
<v Speaker 3>according to some pools, around eighty percent of appro rating it's.

0:16:40.280 --> 0:16:43.320
<v Speaker 2>Quite a lot more popular than President Trump or In

0:16:43.480 --> 0:16:45.080
<v Speaker 2>or indeed most other leaders.

0:16:46.040 --> 0:16:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, even then Lopezo with at all, which is crazy, right.

0:16:49.120 --> 0:16:52.840
<v Speaker 3>So I guess she has managed to have two speeches.

0:16:53.160 --> 0:16:57.880
<v Speaker 3>One for the US public, the economy is the politicians,

0:16:58.640 --> 0:17:03.080
<v Speaker 3>where she's discussing these tray issues. She's pretty much recognizing

0:17:03.160 --> 0:17:06.520
<v Speaker 3>that she has to have a good relationship with Trump,

0:17:07.080 --> 0:17:10.720
<v Speaker 3>But she also has another speech for the base that's

0:17:10.760 --> 0:17:14.560
<v Speaker 3>pretty much Mexico is a sovereign country. The US will

0:17:14.600 --> 0:17:19.680
<v Speaker 3>never enter Mexico to try to dismantle fentany or laboratories,

0:17:19.800 --> 0:17:25.800
<v Speaker 3>or to detain drop traffickers or stop migration. She's very careful,

0:17:25.800 --> 0:17:27.919
<v Speaker 3>and we can see that when she's doing like a

0:17:28.040 --> 0:17:31.840
<v Speaker 3>rally in a state around the country. She goes to

0:17:31.920 --> 0:17:34.480
<v Speaker 3>this speech and that goes pretty well with the base.

0:17:34.640 --> 0:17:38.320
<v Speaker 3>I'm not trying to assume that the base don't understand

0:17:38.600 --> 0:17:39.439
<v Speaker 3>what she's doing.

0:17:39.840 --> 0:17:40.280
<v Speaker 1>They do.

0:17:40.800 --> 0:17:43.520
<v Speaker 3>And when you talk to people that tell you she

0:17:43.640 --> 0:17:45.280
<v Speaker 3>has handled from pretty well.

0:17:45.600 --> 0:17:47.640
<v Speaker 1>The pesto is good, the pestot.

0:17:47.440 --> 0:17:50.960
<v Speaker 3>Is stronger, we don't have more tariff. She's raising the

0:17:51.040 --> 0:17:54.320
<v Speaker 3>minimum ways and that kind of stuff. We're getting the pension.

0:17:55.000 --> 0:17:58.240
<v Speaker 3>So people see that. I guess they're happy, and.

0:17:58.280 --> 0:18:01.520
<v Speaker 2>A small philosophical question. It's not a question at all. Ever,

0:18:01.560 --> 0:18:05.679
<v Speaker 2>since NAFTA, which is now more than thirty years ago,

0:18:06.160 --> 0:18:08.720
<v Speaker 2>the country has made a bet on being closer and

0:18:08.760 --> 0:18:11.760
<v Speaker 2>closer to the US, and as you described, alex the

0:18:11.840 --> 0:18:14.840
<v Speaker 2>integration of the supply chains has probably gone further than

0:18:14.880 --> 0:18:18.520
<v Speaker 2>anyone might have expected back in back when that treaty

0:18:18.640 --> 0:18:22.560
<v Speaker 2>was signed. These days we talk a lot about countries

0:18:22.800 --> 0:18:26.520
<v Speaker 2>looking to diversify, being concerned about the US being so

0:18:26.680 --> 0:18:31.000
<v Speaker 2>uncertain on being an unreliable ally these constant threats. He

0:18:31.040 --> 0:18:34.520
<v Speaker 2>seems to be particularly rude, often to his friends. Is

0:18:34.560 --> 0:18:36.920
<v Speaker 2>anyone questioning that? I mean, you would look at Mexico

0:18:37.000 --> 0:18:40.440
<v Speaker 2>and say, wouldn't be so bad to be a bit

0:18:40.480 --> 0:18:43.840
<v Speaker 2>more diversified in your exports, to not be so dependent

0:18:43.920 --> 0:18:47.320
<v Speaker 2>on the US. But is that even an option for Mexico.

0:18:47.760 --> 0:18:51.240
<v Speaker 3>In a normal scenario, this will be an option. But

0:18:51.880 --> 0:18:55.399
<v Speaker 3>we're in a moment that you just cannot upset Trump.

0:18:55.720 --> 0:18:59.119
<v Speaker 3>Mexico is improving a free trade deal with the European Union,

0:19:00.119 --> 0:19:03.439
<v Speaker 3>working on that. They're trying to have more cooperation and

0:19:03.480 --> 0:19:06.600
<v Speaker 3>more trade with Brazil, for example, which is a huge country.

0:19:06.720 --> 0:19:09.119
<v Speaker 1>But they're pretty shy about it.

0:19:09.160 --> 0:19:13.760
<v Speaker 3>Even Canada McCartney has sent to Mexico his main minister

0:19:13.960 --> 0:19:17.920
<v Speaker 3>is trying to reach a better bilateral deal between both

0:19:17.960 --> 0:19:22.640
<v Speaker 3>countries to be stronger for training negotiations. And what has

0:19:22.720 --> 0:19:26.920
<v Speaker 3>been the US response has been like, maybe the USMCA

0:19:27.320 --> 0:19:31.480
<v Speaker 3>negotiation will be bilateral instead of trade lateral, because he

0:19:31.560 --> 0:19:35.080
<v Speaker 3>knows that they're stronger together. So I guess that's one

0:19:35.119 --> 0:19:39.320
<v Speaker 3>of the complicated issues. Everybody knows that Mexico should diversify

0:19:39.359 --> 0:19:43.879
<v Speaker 3>its economy. I think the government is trying. It's being shy,

0:19:43.960 --> 0:19:47.120
<v Speaker 3>but it's trying. But it's hard because if you're sending

0:19:47.200 --> 0:19:50.399
<v Speaker 3>eighty percent of your experts and you're a manufacturing country,

0:19:50.440 --> 0:19:53.280
<v Speaker 3>you cannot upset your northern neighbor.

0:19:53.320 --> 0:19:54.199
<v Speaker 2>If you allow me.

0:19:54.320 --> 0:19:57.439
<v Speaker 5>Adding one more thing about that, and is that yes,

0:19:57.640 --> 0:20:01.480
<v Speaker 5>as Alex mentioned, government officials and people in Mexico would

0:20:01.560 --> 0:20:05.320
<v Speaker 5>like to have a better diversified trade, as you mentioned,

0:20:06.200 --> 0:20:09.680
<v Speaker 5>and as Alex was explaining, it's now probably not the

0:20:09.720 --> 0:20:14.040
<v Speaker 5>best time to do it. And there's like serious worries

0:20:14.119 --> 0:20:17.679
<v Speaker 5>about what would happen to Mexico if you jeopardize at

0:20:17.720 --> 0:20:20.879
<v Speaker 5>all the trade relations with the US. And because of

0:20:21.000 --> 0:20:24.959
<v Speaker 5>all of those constraints and concerns. Actually, along with the

0:20:25.000 --> 0:20:29.280
<v Speaker 5>budget for twenty twenty six, the government submitted the proposal

0:20:29.800 --> 0:20:34.800
<v Speaker 5>to impose tariffs on imports from China and other countries

0:20:34.840 --> 0:20:38.120
<v Speaker 5>into Mexico. Countries with which Mexico doesn't have a free

0:20:38.160 --> 0:20:38.960
<v Speaker 5>trade agreement.

0:20:39.480 --> 0:20:41.480
<v Speaker 2>Was that far after US pressure? Do you think? What

0:20:41.920 --> 0:20:43.000
<v Speaker 2>do you think was driving now?

0:20:43.240 --> 0:20:47.040
<v Speaker 5>It's well known that the US, as part of negotiating

0:20:47.040 --> 0:20:51.760
<v Speaker 5>with Mexico, wants to make sure that Mexico implements some

0:20:53.040 --> 0:20:56.480
<v Speaker 5>trade barriers with China in order to make sure that

0:20:56.680 --> 0:20:59.679
<v Speaker 5>China is not used in Mexico and third countries to

0:20:59.720 --> 0:21:03.639
<v Speaker 5>serve convent the tariffs that the US has imposed on China.

0:21:04.280 --> 0:21:07.520
<v Speaker 5>There's a lot of talk and actually some evidence that

0:21:07.640 --> 0:21:12.200
<v Speaker 5>shows that exports from China to Mexico have sharply increased

0:21:12.280 --> 0:21:15.320
<v Speaker 5>in the last couple of years, which coincides with the

0:21:15.400 --> 0:21:20.560
<v Speaker 5>increasing US tariffs on imports from China, and that has

0:21:20.760 --> 0:21:26.760
<v Speaker 5>all inspired or points to some triangulation of exports from

0:21:26.880 --> 0:21:29.720
<v Speaker 5>China through Mexico that finally end up in the US

0:21:29.760 --> 0:21:32.520
<v Speaker 5>to avoid US tariffs. The US is aware of these

0:21:32.680 --> 0:21:36.280
<v Speaker 5>and has asked to Mexico to take steps in order

0:21:36.320 --> 0:21:40.320
<v Speaker 5>to prevent these and the initiative for Mexico to impose

0:21:40.400 --> 0:21:43.760
<v Speaker 5>tariffs on their imports from China is pretty much aligned

0:21:43.760 --> 0:21:47.359
<v Speaker 5>with that. I think is part of Mexico's attempt to

0:21:48.200 --> 0:21:51.280
<v Speaker 5>have something to show to the US about their willingness

0:21:51.400 --> 0:21:57.760
<v Speaker 5>to cooperate and their hope that with steps like those,

0:21:58.040 --> 0:22:00.320
<v Speaker 5>they are showing the commitment that they have to have a

0:22:00.520 --> 0:22:03.600
<v Speaker 5>lateral relationship with the US, and then they are willing

0:22:03.640 --> 0:22:07.240
<v Speaker 5>to compromise in order to secure that the free trade

0:22:07.240 --> 0:22:10.000
<v Speaker 5>agreement with next with the US will remain in place

0:22:10.119 --> 0:22:12.520
<v Speaker 5>once it's reviewed next year.

0:22:13.320 --> 0:22:16.080
<v Speaker 3>And I'm glad philipp mentioned that, if I may it,

0:22:16.200 --> 0:22:20.840
<v Speaker 3>because she sent this proposal to Congress. We're talking about

0:22:21.359 --> 0:22:28.200
<v Speaker 3>like more than a thousand categories of products, including steel, toys, textiles, shoes,

0:22:28.880 --> 0:22:31.159
<v Speaker 3>you name it. We have a lot of stuff, but

0:22:31.320 --> 0:22:34.520
<v Speaker 3>this you would expect that Congress would pass it like

0:22:34.680 --> 0:22:37.639
<v Speaker 3>right away because they have the majority. They decided to

0:22:37.720 --> 0:22:42.159
<v Speaker 3>delay the discussion, and I've been talking to several lawmakers

0:22:42.160 --> 0:22:44.480
<v Speaker 3>from the ruling party, and I guess this is when

0:22:44.640 --> 0:22:48.560
<v Speaker 3>you know these old school groups from Lopezo re Alora,

0:22:49.280 --> 0:22:54.240
<v Speaker 3>they're not that happy to raising tariffs on China because

0:22:54.240 --> 0:22:55.879
<v Speaker 3>they want to have a good relationship.

0:22:55.880 --> 0:22:57.240
<v Speaker 2>You CUsing off your options.

0:22:57.320 --> 0:22:59.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's right, and they want to keep a good

0:22:59.440 --> 0:23:03.960
<v Speaker 3>relationship China. So this is a perfect example that maybe

0:23:04.000 --> 0:23:08.119
<v Speaker 3>she doesn't have a strong real opposition, but within the party,

0:23:08.560 --> 0:23:11.359
<v Speaker 3>she's not breed to do whatever she wants. So they're

0:23:11.359 --> 0:23:14.199
<v Speaker 3>discussing this, trying to move the numbers a little bit.

0:23:14.280 --> 0:23:19.040
<v Speaker 3>So this doesn't look too bad for China. Still pleases

0:23:19.080 --> 0:23:20.960
<v Speaker 3>strump So that's the balance.

0:23:21.000 --> 0:23:24.120
<v Speaker 2>Both of you. Just very quickly, if people who are

0:23:24.119 --> 0:23:28.720
<v Speaker 2>not tuning in to Mexico very often, maybe occasionally see

0:23:28.760 --> 0:23:32.840
<v Speaker 2>President Scheinbaum come in a viral clip when she's talking

0:23:32.880 --> 0:23:35.600
<v Speaker 2>about the Gulf of Mexico versus the Gulf of America.

0:23:36.000 --> 0:23:38.840
<v Speaker 2>Are their potential flash points in the next few months

0:23:38.840 --> 0:23:40.840
<v Speaker 2>that we should look at, because we've talked about a

0:23:40.960 --> 0:23:43.600
<v Speaker 2>very narrow line that she has to walk between some

0:23:43.640 --> 0:23:46.639
<v Speaker 2>of this kind of internal opposition, not very much, but

0:23:46.720 --> 0:23:53.240
<v Speaker 2>some concern and instincts versus the pressure from the US

0:23:53.280 --> 0:23:56.959
<v Speaker 2>and the vital importance of that trading relationship. What are

0:23:56.960 --> 0:23:59.360
<v Speaker 2>the things to watch out for over the next few

0:23:59.400 --> 0:24:01.159
<v Speaker 2>months to know how this is going to go.

0:24:02.200 --> 0:24:05.080
<v Speaker 5>I would pay attention to two things, or basically one

0:24:05.560 --> 0:24:09.960
<v Speaker 5>acknowledging that the external front is very important. But on

0:24:10.000 --> 0:24:15.120
<v Speaker 5>that front, the final decision really or I would say

0:24:16.040 --> 0:24:19.040
<v Speaker 5>seventy five percent of the decision or the outcome on

0:24:19.119 --> 0:24:22.480
<v Speaker 5>that front is not under shame Baum's control, but on

0:24:22.520 --> 0:24:25.320
<v Speaker 5>the White House and President Trump. So yes, keep an

0:24:25.359 --> 0:24:28.400
<v Speaker 5>eye on that, but be aware that Trump is still

0:24:28.400 --> 0:24:31.560
<v Speaker 5>probably the one that will decide the end result of that,

0:24:31.960 --> 0:24:35.200
<v Speaker 5>with some input from Shameebaum, and of course a lot

0:24:35.400 --> 0:24:38.440
<v Speaker 5>based on how Shaanebaum deals with Trump, which until now

0:24:38.440 --> 0:24:41.199
<v Speaker 5>she has done fairly well, and therefore I would assume

0:24:41.200 --> 0:24:43.240
<v Speaker 5>she will continue to do. And I'll be not so

0:24:43.359 --> 0:24:46.800
<v Speaker 5>worried about what Shamee Baum does about the trade relationship

0:24:46.840 --> 0:24:49.280
<v Speaker 5>with the US, but more about what Trump does on

0:24:49.320 --> 0:24:51.760
<v Speaker 5>that front. I would pay more attention to what Shane

0:24:51.800 --> 0:24:57.000
<v Speaker 5>Baum says regarding domestic economic policies. How much shame Boum

0:24:57.119 --> 0:25:02.560
<v Speaker 5>really moves away from the attack from her predecessor, Ovador

0:25:02.920 --> 0:25:07.320
<v Speaker 5>attacks against the private industry and private investment. How at

0:25:07.400 --> 0:25:09.800
<v Speaker 5>least from what we have seen so far, she keeps

0:25:09.840 --> 0:25:15.720
<v Speaker 5>moving forward with a more market friendly economic policy framework,

0:25:15.840 --> 0:25:20.119
<v Speaker 5>which is starting to generate a little bit more of

0:25:20.200 --> 0:25:26.320
<v Speaker 5>confidence and optimism domestically among private investment investors. As long

0:25:26.359 --> 0:25:29.560
<v Speaker 5>as she keeps moving in that direction, I would say

0:25:30.040 --> 0:25:33.840
<v Speaker 5>investors and people that follow Mexico could be a little

0:25:33.880 --> 0:25:38.080
<v Speaker 5>bit more optimistic about Mexico's outlook. And as we have

0:25:38.200 --> 0:25:43.560
<v Speaker 5>discussed so far in this podcast, she still has to

0:25:43.600 --> 0:25:48.000
<v Speaker 5>strike a balance between the more market friendly economic policies

0:25:48.359 --> 0:25:53.440
<v Speaker 5>and those policies that her predecessor was implementing which were

0:25:53.520 --> 0:25:56.800
<v Speaker 5>not that friendly, but that she needs to make sure

0:25:56.840 --> 0:26:01.600
<v Speaker 5>that she keeps his support to make sure that Governori

0:26:01.760 --> 0:26:03.520
<v Speaker 5>doesn't turn into an issue for her.

0:26:03.840 --> 0:26:07.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I agree with what Felipe is saying. I think

0:26:07.080 --> 0:26:12.000
<v Speaker 3>in the external front, the only thing we should expect,

0:26:12.240 --> 0:26:16.640
<v Speaker 3>probably for the next three years, is uncertainty. We don't

0:26:16.680 --> 0:26:19.560
<v Speaker 3>know what's going to happen. I think markets are really

0:26:19.840 --> 0:26:24.120
<v Speaker 3>pretty well what's going on. We're seeing the PESL very strong,

0:26:24.240 --> 0:26:27.600
<v Speaker 3>the Mexican bonds, so I think the market is reading that.

0:26:28.440 --> 0:26:32.639
<v Speaker 3>I think the current deal we have is good for Trump,

0:26:33.400 --> 0:26:36.080
<v Speaker 3>That's why it hasn't changed. It seems like he came

0:26:36.119 --> 0:26:39.479
<v Speaker 3>to power yesterday, but it's been almost a year, so

0:26:39.640 --> 0:26:44.200
<v Speaker 3>I don't think things are going to change much for Mexico. Obviously,

0:26:44.240 --> 0:26:47.680
<v Speaker 3>we have the free Trade review and we should keep

0:26:48.600 --> 0:26:52.240
<v Speaker 3>special attention to that. But I agree with Philippe, we

0:26:52.280 --> 0:26:55.600
<v Speaker 3>should pay special attention to the domestic front. And she's

0:26:55.640 --> 0:26:59.720
<v Speaker 3>doing efforts to maybe not diversify the economy, but the

0:27:00.080 --> 0:27:04.240
<v Speaker 3>endless on the US. She proposed in January, knowing what

0:27:04.359 --> 0:27:08.000
<v Speaker 3>Trunk was going to do to create these development hobs.

0:27:08.040 --> 0:27:11.040
<v Speaker 3>These are some development hubs in different areas in the

0:27:11.080 --> 0:27:12.560
<v Speaker 3>country to attract investment.

0:27:12.680 --> 0:27:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Since near sharing was low.

0:27:14.840 --> 0:27:18.359
<v Speaker 3>In because everybody knew TRUP was going to win, she's

0:27:18.480 --> 0:27:22.400
<v Speaker 3>giving tax incentives to foreign companies to invest in Mexico.

0:27:22.520 --> 0:27:26.440
<v Speaker 3>I visited a couple and this is just empty land yet,

0:27:26.560 --> 0:27:29.520
<v Speaker 3>so this shows a little bit that the investment are

0:27:29.600 --> 0:27:32.360
<v Speaker 3>not here. So we should pay attention to what she's

0:27:32.400 --> 0:27:35.560
<v Speaker 3>going to do to attract investment. And I think the

0:27:35.680 --> 0:27:41.439
<v Speaker 3>key sector is energy. Mexico lacks energy, and if especially

0:27:41.920 --> 0:27:45.680
<v Speaker 3>power generation and transmission, and if you want companies to come,

0:27:45.800 --> 0:27:48.600
<v Speaker 3>we need to see more energy projects and we're not

0:27:48.680 --> 0:27:49.680
<v Speaker 3>seeing that right now.

0:27:49.720 --> 0:27:51.000
<v Speaker 1>So I guess that's the key.

0:27:51.200 --> 0:27:54.040
<v Speaker 3>If she is able to attract investment, that's the only

0:27:54.119 --> 0:27:56.600
<v Speaker 3>way to depend less on the US.

0:27:57.000 --> 0:27:58.720
<v Speaker 2>I guess you should have to keep getting to the

0:27:58.840 --> 0:28:02.760
<v Speaker 2>empty bit of ground, look for green shoots. Well, if

0:28:02.760 --> 0:28:05.879
<v Speaker 2>anybody from a President Chinbaum staff is listening, or I

0:28:05.960 --> 0:28:08.119
<v Speaker 2>do the President herself, she is more than welcome to

0:28:08.119 --> 0:28:11.040
<v Speaker 2>come on Trumpnomics and explain exactly how she's going to

0:28:11.119 --> 0:28:14.159
<v Speaker 2>navigate these difficult waters. I'm going to be in Mexico

0:28:14.240 --> 0:28:16.760
<v Speaker 2>myself in early December. I'll be happy to go and

0:28:16.800 --> 0:28:19.639
<v Speaker 2>see her anytime, any place. But in the meantime we

0:28:19.720 --> 0:28:22.320
<v Speaker 2>have something almost as good. Filipe and Alex, thank you

0:28:22.400 --> 0:28:22.800
<v Speaker 2>so much.

0:28:23.280 --> 0:28:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Stephanie, thank you too.

0:28:32.640 --> 0:28:34.919
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for listening to trump Andomics from Bloomberg. It was

0:28:34.920 --> 0:28:37.720
<v Speaker 2>hosted by me, Stephanie Flanders, and I was joined this

0:28:37.760 --> 0:28:42.360
<v Speaker 2>week by Bloomberg's Alex Vaswez and Philip Bernandez. Trump Andomics

0:28:42.400 --> 0:28:45.280
<v Speaker 2>was produced by Sammasadi and Moses and Am, with help

0:28:45.320 --> 0:28:49.200
<v Speaker 2>from Amy Keene and special thanks to Rachel Lewis Chrisky.

0:28:49.560 --> 0:28:52.520
<v Speaker 2>Sound design is by Blake Maples and Kelly Gary, and

0:28:52.640 --> 0:28:56.959
<v Speaker 2>Sage Bowman is Bloomberg's head of podcasts. To help others

0:28:57.040 --> 0:29:00.480
<v Speaker 2>find the show, please rate it and review it highly

0:29:00.680 --> 0:29:01.560
<v Speaker 2>wherever you listen.