WEBVTT - Should politicians be funny? (with Mike Birbiglia)

0:00:11.880 --> 0:00:14.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm Manny, I'm Noah, this is Devin and this is

0:00:14.760 --> 0:00:17.160
<v Speaker 1>no such thing. The show where we settle our drum

0:00:17.280 --> 0:00:21.800
<v Speaker 1>arguments and yours by actually doing the research. On today's episode,

0:00:22.000 --> 0:00:25.360
<v Speaker 1>should Politicians be Funny? And his humor kind of a

0:00:25.480 --> 0:00:28.639
<v Speaker 1>cheat code to getting elected? As always, we'll talk to

0:00:28.680 --> 0:00:32.199
<v Speaker 1>an expert, but then stick around for my conversation with

0:00:32.360 --> 0:00:33.960
<v Speaker 1>comedian Mike Verbiglia.

0:00:34.280 --> 0:00:38.199
<v Speaker 2>What a deeply unfunny person. He doesn't have it.

0:00:40.720 --> 0:00:47.280
<v Speaker 3>No, there's no no such thing, no touch thing, touch, thank.

0:00:49.159 --> 0:00:50.280
<v Speaker 4>Touch, thank.

0:00:52.159 --> 0:00:53.280
<v Speaker 5>Touch thank.

0:00:57.520 --> 0:01:01.240
<v Speaker 1>All right, boys, I was influenced to do this episode

0:01:01.400 --> 0:01:09.600
<v Speaker 1>based on some recent activity by one Gavin Newsom. In case, yeah,

0:01:09.680 --> 0:01:12.520
<v Speaker 1>in case you're someone in the audience who literally does

0:01:12.560 --> 0:01:14.240
<v Speaker 1>not consume one ounce of politics.

0:01:14.840 --> 0:01:15.160
<v Speaker 6>Uh.

0:01:15.280 --> 0:01:18.520
<v Speaker 7>While a lot of our audience is international, many assume

0:01:18.600 --> 0:01:20.240
<v Speaker 7>they know American politics.

0:01:20.880 --> 0:01:25.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry for for huge in Australia. Yeah, I'm sorry

0:01:25.640 --> 0:01:30.480
<v Speaker 1>for doing international erasure. But Gavin Newsom is a Democrat.

0:01:30.680 --> 0:01:35.000
<v Speaker 1>He's the former mayor of San Francisco. He's the current

0:01:35.080 --> 0:01:41.880
<v Speaker 1>governor of California. He's kind of like your archetypal politician, right,

0:01:41.920 --> 0:01:44.440
<v Speaker 1>He's like literally got slicked back here. He's always wearing

0:01:44.440 --> 0:01:48.760
<v Speaker 1>a suit, very polished, he's got the veneers good talk,

0:01:49.160 --> 0:01:51.120
<v Speaker 1>or if he doesn't have veneers, don't sue me. He's

0:01:51.120 --> 0:01:53.440
<v Speaker 1>got really great teeth. Yeah, it would be amazy if

0:01:54.440 --> 0:01:57.120
<v Speaker 1>if he doesn't have a credit veneers congratulations, and he's

0:01:57.160 --> 0:02:01.040
<v Speaker 1>probably going to be running for president. Is we've come

0:02:01.080 --> 0:02:09.200
<v Speaker 1>to terms with that by now, Perhaps because of this

0:02:09.320 --> 0:02:14.040
<v Speaker 1>impending presidential run, Gavin Newsom and his team have turned

0:02:14.120 --> 0:02:19.240
<v Speaker 1>up the aggression, let's say, towards Donald Trump.

0:02:18.960 --> 0:02:21.160
<v Speaker 3>And we need to stand up to this authoritary. We

0:02:21.200 --> 0:02:24.800
<v Speaker 3>need to stand up at this moment, fighting fire with fire.

0:02:24.960 --> 0:02:26.880
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to punch these sons of bitches in the mouth.

0:02:27.120 --> 0:02:29.440
<v Speaker 1>And one of the ways Gavin Newsom is doing this

0:02:29.800 --> 0:02:34.200
<v Speaker 1>is by using humor. They are mocking Donald Trump on

0:02:34.280 --> 0:02:35.240
<v Speaker 1>social media.

0:02:35.400 --> 0:02:38.400
<v Speaker 6>So just to look at some of the tweets here,

0:02:39.000 --> 0:02:42.320
<v Speaker 6>all capital letters Trump and.

0:02:42.280 --> 0:02:43.200
<v Speaker 5>Very trump like.

0:02:43.280 --> 0:02:47.600
<v Speaker 8>It's obviously trying to go Trump and get at tension.

0:02:48.160 --> 0:02:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Basically, Donald Trump uses a very specific syntax in his posts.

0:02:53.480 --> 0:02:57.480
<v Speaker 1>He does all caps, sometimes he capitalizes words that don't

0:02:57.520 --> 0:03:00.600
<v Speaker 1>need to be capitalized, he puts quotes aroun words that

0:03:00.639 --> 0:03:04.560
<v Speaker 1>don't need quotes, and the Gavin Teae is writing parody

0:03:04.639 --> 0:03:08.240
<v Speaker 1>versions of those except to push their own agenda.

0:03:08.840 --> 0:03:13.440
<v Speaker 9>In one post, Gavin Newsom calls maga Republicans quote snowflakes

0:03:13.440 --> 0:03:16.880
<v Speaker 9>and all caps, and another he says this quote Donald

0:03:16.960 --> 0:03:20.120
<v Speaker 9>is finished. He is no longer hot. First the hands

0:03:20.320 --> 0:03:24.079
<v Speaker 9>so tiny, and now me, Gavin C. Newsom have taken

0:03:24.120 --> 0:03:27.520
<v Speaker 9>away his step. Many are saying he can't even do

0:03:27.720 --> 0:03:31.040
<v Speaker 9>the big stairs on Air Force one anymore, uses the

0:03:31.080 --> 0:03:33.720
<v Speaker 9>little baby stairs now sad.

0:03:35.160 --> 0:03:39.160
<v Speaker 1>While conservatives argue that this is childish and silly.

0:03:39.680 --> 0:03:42.120
<v Speaker 9>If I run his wife, I would say, you are

0:03:42.200 --> 0:03:43.760
<v Speaker 9>making a fool of yourself.

0:03:44.000 --> 0:03:44.520
<v Speaker 6>Stop it.

0:03:44.680 --> 0:03:46.720
<v Speaker 9>He's got a big job as governor of California, but

0:03:46.760 --> 0:03:48.240
<v Speaker 9>if he wants an even bigger job, he has to

0:03:48.280 --> 0:03:49.400
<v Speaker 9>be a little bit more serious.

0:03:49.880 --> 0:03:53.560
<v Speaker 1>Democrats have been saying, yeah, that's kind of the whole point.

0:03:54.000 --> 0:03:57.480
<v Speaker 10>I freaking love what Governor Newsom is doing because that's

0:03:57.520 --> 0:04:01.480
<v Speaker 10>what offense looks like. And I'm tired of being told,

0:04:01.520 --> 0:04:04.680
<v Speaker 10>you know, when they go low, we go high. I mean,

0:04:04.720 --> 0:04:07.160
<v Speaker 10>the way I see it, when they go low, we

0:04:07.200 --> 0:04:10.360
<v Speaker 10>should bury their ideas below the capitol.

0:04:13.600 --> 0:04:16.680
<v Speaker 1>So this was going on throughout twenty twenty five, but

0:04:16.880 --> 0:04:19.839
<v Speaker 1>as recently as a few days ago on New Year's Eve,

0:04:20.279 --> 0:04:24.440
<v Speaker 1>Gavin's press team posted this happy New Year to everyone,

0:04:24.680 --> 0:04:30.200
<v Speaker 1>especially the deeply disturbed losers suffering from extreme Newsome derangement syndrome.

0:04:30.440 --> 0:04:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of losers, I hope Donald Trump has the twenty

0:04:33.360 --> 0:04:37.599
<v Speaker 1>twenty six quote he deserves after unleashing chaos on the

0:04:37.600 --> 0:04:41.360
<v Speaker 1>people of this great country. But I want to play you, guys,

0:04:41.640 --> 0:04:45.719
<v Speaker 1>Gavin Newsom on Stephen Colbert's show. He responds to the

0:04:45.880 --> 0:04:48.000
<v Speaker 1>reaction that he's been getting to some of the stuff.

0:04:48.120 --> 0:04:48.720
<v Speaker 10>Two kings.

0:04:48.839 --> 0:04:50.840
<v Speaker 3>Everything we were doing and try to break through wasn't

0:04:50.839 --> 0:04:53.600
<v Speaker 3>working anymore. And so we decided to do something right

0:04:53.640 --> 0:04:57.599
<v Speaker 3>to your point, a novel called Humor. And I gotta say,

0:04:57.720 --> 0:05:01.400
<v Speaker 3>oftentimes Democrats we're little, you know, we just we don't

0:05:01.440 --> 0:05:03.440
<v Speaker 3>We're not as humorous as we should be. Little staff

0:05:03.480 --> 0:05:05.320
<v Speaker 3>could be a little stiff. Yeah, And so we thought

0:05:05.360 --> 0:05:07.520
<v Speaker 3>we'd have some fun with it. But I never imagined

0:05:07.839 --> 0:05:10.040
<v Speaker 3>it would break through like it has and get under

0:05:10.080 --> 0:05:12.120
<v Speaker 3>the skin of the President of the United States and

0:05:12.160 --> 0:05:13.040
<v Speaker 3>some of my friends.

0:05:14.480 --> 0:05:16.920
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was interesting that this kind of usage,

0:05:17.240 --> 0:05:22.479
<v Speaker 1>deliberate usage of humor in a political strategy.

0:05:22.560 --> 0:05:26.720
<v Speaker 7>Especially as Newsom says, they try other things and they

0:05:26.760 --> 0:05:29.240
<v Speaker 7>didn't break through. Right, So this wasn't the first thing

0:05:29.279 --> 0:05:32.560
<v Speaker 7>on their list, but it's the thing that they think

0:05:32.640 --> 0:05:33.200
<v Speaker 7>has worked.

0:05:34.120 --> 0:05:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and he's obviously not the first politician to try

0:05:38.040 --> 0:05:42.320
<v Speaker 1>and inject comedy or humor into his political strategy. You've

0:05:42.360 --> 0:05:46.240
<v Speaker 1>got people like Donald Trump, who sometimes makes you laugh

0:05:46.279 --> 0:05:48.680
<v Speaker 1>by accident, like you're laughing at him, but sometimes it's

0:05:48.720 --> 0:05:50.840
<v Speaker 1>saying stuff that's supposed to make you laugh.

0:05:51.040 --> 0:05:54.320
<v Speaker 11>Is visceral response to attack people on their appearance.

0:05:54.680 --> 0:05:57.440
<v Speaker 4>I never attacked him on his look. And believe me,

0:05:57.640 --> 0:05:59.800
<v Speaker 4>there's plenty of subject matter right there.

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:00.720
<v Speaker 12>That I can tell.

0:06:00.760 --> 0:06:03.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, We've got characters like Eric Adams, who like

0:06:03.880 --> 0:06:05.880
<v Speaker 1>is saying some absolutely insane.

0:06:05.560 --> 0:06:09.919
<v Speaker 7>Shiit n life may I I got to test the product.

0:06:10.040 --> 0:06:14.040
<v Speaker 1>But he I think he knows that he's hilarious. Yeah,

0:06:14.120 --> 0:06:18.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious. Do you guys feel like humor is a

0:06:18.920 --> 0:06:22.599
<v Speaker 1>successful strategy for politicians to appear more relatable? Like, have

0:06:22.720 --> 0:06:25.560
<v Speaker 1>we just been seeing very specific cases? Do we feel

0:06:25.920 --> 0:06:27.880
<v Speaker 1>largely that they should stick to policy?

0:06:28.040 --> 0:06:30.839
<v Speaker 11>Well, it's interesting because the conversation today is so focused

0:06:30.880 --> 0:06:33.320
<v Speaker 11>on like their social media accounts, which it's like, Gavin's

0:06:33.400 --> 0:06:36.600
<v Speaker 11>not in the lab photoshop making this up. You know what?

0:06:36.640 --> 0:06:38.800
<v Speaker 11>I mean, so it's like that that to me adds

0:06:38.800 --> 0:06:40.400
<v Speaker 11>a layer where I'm like, all right, this isn't you.

0:06:40.480 --> 0:06:43.000
<v Speaker 11>This is like a bunch of whatever thirty year olds

0:06:43.320 --> 0:06:45.200
<v Speaker 11>who work for you making that makes it like this

0:06:45.320 --> 0:06:47.320
<v Speaker 11>distance where it's like, well, I don't even think you're funny,

0:06:47.800 --> 0:06:50.440
<v Speaker 11>you know. I think a lot of politicians, you know,

0:06:50.480 --> 0:06:52.680
<v Speaker 11>It's like Obama was funny famously.

0:06:52.200 --> 0:06:55.280
<v Speaker 1>The White House correspondent, like he was very like.

0:06:55.279 --> 0:06:58.000
<v Speaker 11>Good comic timing and like that is relatable, or like,

0:06:58.320 --> 0:07:00.680
<v Speaker 11>you know, Bernie Sanders is funny when he's and like,

0:07:00.800 --> 0:07:02.880
<v Speaker 11>you know, dismissing something or whatever. Like So, I mean,

0:07:02.920 --> 0:07:05.920
<v Speaker 11>I think it's a good and normal human thing to

0:07:07.040 --> 0:07:09.359
<v Speaker 11>use humor. I don't think it should be like the

0:07:09.400 --> 0:07:12.920
<v Speaker 11>bulk of your political strategy. It's like the who would

0:07:12.920 --> 0:07:13.440
<v Speaker 11>you want to get.

0:07:13.320 --> 0:07:13.680
<v Speaker 10>A beer with?

0:07:13.840 --> 0:07:16.560
<v Speaker 11>Thing? Like I remember when our boy George W. Bush

0:07:16.600 --> 0:07:18.160
<v Speaker 11>was elected. That was like the big thing. It's like

0:07:18.360 --> 0:07:22.160
<v Speaker 11>he seems like a chummy guy. Yeah, It's like and

0:07:22.200 --> 0:07:24.160
<v Speaker 11>like that counts for something. It's like, Okay, can this

0:07:24.240 --> 0:07:28.040
<v Speaker 11>be someone I could relate to in a normal human way.

0:07:28.360 --> 0:07:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:07:29.080 --> 0:07:32.680
<v Speaker 7>I think people are over estimating the power of humor

0:07:32.760 --> 0:07:35.600
<v Speaker 7>because I think what people associate humor with is like

0:07:35.960 --> 0:07:40.600
<v Speaker 7>authenticity or like not being guarded or buttoned up. But

0:07:40.720 --> 0:07:44.960
<v Speaker 7>if you're not naturally funny or you're forcing humor, it

0:07:45.040 --> 0:07:45.920
<v Speaker 7>also doesn't work.

0:07:45.960 --> 0:07:46.040
<v Speaker 10>Right.

0:07:46.080 --> 0:07:49.800
<v Speaker 7>We've seen plenty of examples of like really stuffy politicians

0:07:49.840 --> 0:07:51.880
<v Speaker 7>trying to be funny and it's like, yeah, okay, this

0:07:52.040 --> 0:07:53.000
<v Speaker 7>is even worse.

0:07:53.240 --> 0:07:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Jd Vance with the yeah.

0:07:54.880 --> 0:07:57.760
<v Speaker 7>Jd Vance is like someone who famously is not funny,

0:07:57.840 --> 0:08:01.000
<v Speaker 7>right like, and he tries and it doesn't connect.

0:08:01.120 --> 0:08:01.240
<v Speaker 13>Right.

0:08:01.280 --> 0:08:04.800
<v Speaker 7>So, I think like a politician could be not trying

0:08:04.840 --> 0:08:07.920
<v Speaker 7>to be funny, but just a little bit less guarded,

0:08:08.320 --> 0:08:12.120
<v Speaker 7>a little bit more relaxed, a little less worried about

0:08:12.200 --> 0:08:16.280
<v Speaker 7>saying the wrong thing at all times or not saying

0:08:16.360 --> 0:08:19.360
<v Speaker 7>anything at all because you're so afraid of what you like,

0:08:19.440 --> 0:08:22.520
<v Speaker 7>who you may upset. I think that more so is

0:08:22.560 --> 0:08:26.320
<v Speaker 7>more important than like a politician being funny.

0:08:26.560 --> 0:08:28.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think you guys are right about this. Essentially,

0:08:28.800 --> 0:08:30.320
<v Speaker 1>with no was saying about would you get a beer

0:08:30.320 --> 0:08:32.680
<v Speaker 1>with this person, it's like this ability for the politician

0:08:32.720 --> 0:08:36.000
<v Speaker 1>to be able to hang essentially. I've been watching unfortunately

0:08:36.080 --> 0:08:39.920
<v Speaker 1>the Flagrant podcast and you just you see politicians go

0:08:40.040 --> 0:08:43.320
<v Speaker 1>on there and you start to wonder the value of

0:08:43.360 --> 0:08:46.320
<v Speaker 1>like them being in that kind of environment. Obviously, Donald

0:08:46.360 --> 0:08:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Trump went on there last year and they were just

0:08:48.480 --> 0:08:50.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of kissing his ass, so it doesn't count. But

0:08:50.559 --> 0:08:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Pete Boodajudge went on, and I was kind of surprised

0:08:53.080 --> 0:08:56.440
<v Speaker 1>by how easily he kind of melted into that, into

0:08:56.480 --> 0:08:57.080
<v Speaker 1>that environment.

0:08:57.200 --> 0:08:59.559
<v Speaker 11>You can't privatize the public park, right, this is the

0:08:59.559 --> 0:09:02.480
<v Speaker 11>all I do, public goods, why we have governments, why

0:09:02.520 --> 0:09:03.320
<v Speaker 11>we collect taxes.

0:09:03.559 --> 0:09:05.439
<v Speaker 5>Were turning to such libs already.

0:09:05.200 --> 0:09:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Dude, and it literally made me as like a voter

0:09:07.640 --> 0:09:09.680
<v Speaker 1>be like oh interesting, Like I didn't know that he

0:09:09.760 --> 0:09:11.760
<v Speaker 1>had this side to him. At the same time, I

0:09:11.880 --> 0:09:14.480
<v Speaker 1>could never imagine Kamala Harris being on that show, because

0:09:15.600 --> 0:09:20.400
<v Speaker 1>some Democrats are so risk averse, not able to be

0:09:20.440 --> 0:09:22.800
<v Speaker 1>an environment where like the questions weren't approved ahead of

0:09:22.800 --> 0:09:25.840
<v Speaker 1>time and that kind of stuff I think gets to people.

0:09:26.080 --> 0:09:29.120
<v Speaker 7>And it's frustrating with her specifically, because I do think

0:09:29.160 --> 0:09:31.000
<v Speaker 7>she has it in her, like I you know, we've

0:09:31.040 --> 0:09:34.160
<v Speaker 7>obviously seen clips and instances of like like her talking

0:09:34.200 --> 0:09:37.280
<v Speaker 7>about cooking and shit. It's just like you can be normal.

0:09:37.400 --> 0:09:40.280
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, No, she seems a lot more normal if she

0:09:40.320 --> 0:09:41.560
<v Speaker 11>would let herself be that way.

0:09:41.760 --> 0:09:42.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's what's so funny.

0:09:42.720 --> 0:09:43.200
<v Speaker 5>Where was this?

0:09:43.320 --> 0:09:44.960
<v Speaker 11>They're going back and forth about her not being on

0:09:45.080 --> 0:09:46.880
<v Speaker 11>Joe Rogan or whatever, and it's like, I actually think

0:09:46.920 --> 0:09:50.280
<v Speaker 11>if she was able to relax and go on something

0:09:50.320 --> 0:09:52.840
<v Speaker 11>like that, she could be good. Yeah, but like she's

0:09:52.880 --> 0:09:55.280
<v Speaker 11>so trained up that she won't. But yeah, when she

0:09:55.280 --> 0:09:57.800
<v Speaker 11>talked about cooking or whatever, like after a speech or whatever,

0:09:57.840 --> 0:09:58.960
<v Speaker 11>talking to just people.

0:09:59.120 --> 0:10:01.800
<v Speaker 5>I should be calling you, Harris, you should not.

0:10:01.880 --> 0:10:03.319
<v Speaker 14>That's not on my birth certificate.

0:10:03.440 --> 0:10:04.880
<v Speaker 8>Okay, just don't call me, Auntie.

0:10:05.960 --> 0:10:06.559
<v Speaker 12>I won't call you.

0:10:07.160 --> 0:10:09.560
<v Speaker 11>You could see you know one how she got to

0:10:09.559 --> 0:10:10.120
<v Speaker 11>where she is.

0:10:10.280 --> 0:10:13.079
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there was a moment the Mama Lass stuff where

0:10:13.080 --> 0:10:15.160
<v Speaker 1>it was like, Okay, this does feel kind of relatable.

0:10:15.400 --> 0:10:18.320
<v Speaker 1>But then you hear stories like the Subway Takes Guy,

0:10:18.679 --> 0:10:21.120
<v Speaker 1>where it's this viral show where you go on and

0:10:21.160 --> 0:10:24.000
<v Speaker 1>give a hot take. Apparently Kamala went on during the

0:10:24.080 --> 0:10:28.280
<v Speaker 1>campaign and had a take that was so focused, group tested,

0:10:28.520 --> 0:10:32.520
<v Speaker 1>and awkward that everyone just mutually decided to scrap the episode.

0:10:32.640 --> 0:10:35.320
<v Speaker 5>Her take was that bad. It was really really bad.

0:10:35.360 --> 0:10:37.760
<v Speaker 5>Then it was it was like, didn't make any sense.

0:10:38.160 --> 0:10:41.360
<v Speaker 5>I can tell you this. I was bacon as a spice, you.

0:10:41.280 --> 0:10:42.120
<v Speaker 10>Think that was her opinion.

0:10:42.200 --> 0:10:43.920
<v Speaker 6>You thinks you had like a research group trying to

0:10:43.920 --> 0:10:44.559
<v Speaker 6>figure something.

0:10:44.360 --> 0:10:46.880
<v Speaker 5>That research group. And then I was like, if I

0:10:46.920 --> 0:10:48.640
<v Speaker 5>post this, a lot of people are going to be

0:10:48.760 --> 0:10:49.120
<v Speaker 5>out at me.

0:10:49.440 --> 0:10:49.640
<v Speaker 11>Now.

0:10:49.960 --> 0:10:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Counter example, Zorn Mundani, newly elected mayor of New York City.

0:10:55.080 --> 0:10:58.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, not like the funniest guy ever, but one

0:10:58.080 --> 0:11:01.760
<v Speaker 1>can easily see the effect a politician can have when

0:11:01.760 --> 0:11:06.960
<v Speaker 1>they're able to be themselves, regardless of the situation or environment.

0:11:07.640 --> 0:11:11.240
<v Speaker 1>But speaking of the effect that politicians can have, we're

0:11:11.280 --> 0:11:15.080
<v Speaker 1>going to be hearing from a humor historian who's going

0:11:15.160 --> 0:11:17.760
<v Speaker 1>to walk us through the history of humor in politics,

0:11:17.960 --> 0:11:21.200
<v Speaker 1>and then we're going to hear from actual comedian Mike Birbiglia.

0:11:21.400 --> 0:11:33.959
<v Speaker 1>That's after the break. We're back. I'm Anny, I'm Noah Devin,

0:11:34.880 --> 0:11:38.520
<v Speaker 1>and we're about to hear from doctor Mark Rolf. He

0:11:38.960 --> 0:11:43.000
<v Speaker 1>is an expert in the history of humor in politics.

0:11:43.640 --> 0:11:46.720
<v Speaker 1>He's a professor at the University of New South Wales

0:11:47.720 --> 0:11:51.480
<v Speaker 1>in Sydney. And here I'll just have him introduce himself.

0:11:51.679 --> 0:11:55.760
<v Speaker 12>Well, basically, I've always been interested in politics, humor and

0:11:55.880 --> 0:11:59.920
<v Speaker 12>history since childhood. I've basically built a career out of

0:12:00.120 --> 0:12:04.960
<v Speaker 12>those three things combined. I treat satire as really a

0:12:05.040 --> 0:12:09.200
<v Speaker 12>species of rhetoric, an offshoot of rhetric. So humor and

0:12:09.240 --> 0:12:12.560
<v Speaker 12>satire generally as means of persuasion.

0:12:13.120 --> 0:12:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So before we get into the weeds, I do

0:12:15.040 --> 0:12:19.719
<v Speaker 1>love to talk about these kind of topics more existentially.

0:12:20.200 --> 0:12:23.920
<v Speaker 1>So I asked him what even is humor? Why do

0:12:23.960 --> 0:12:24.400
<v Speaker 1>we laugh?

0:12:30.000 --> 0:12:33.680
<v Speaker 12>The term humor is an ancient one, but up until

0:12:33.840 --> 0:12:38.400
<v Speaker 12>about three four hundred years ago, it was part of medicine.

0:12:38.679 --> 0:12:45.319
<v Speaker 12>Humor or humors referred to the four liquids of ancient

0:12:45.440 --> 0:12:51.760
<v Speaker 12>and medieval medicine black bile, yellow bile, phlegm, and blood,

0:12:52.240 --> 0:12:57.679
<v Speaker 12>and the balance of these four liquids dictated your temperaments.

0:12:58.280 --> 0:13:01.400
<v Speaker 12>That's why we can still say sometimes, oh, he's in

0:13:01.480 --> 0:13:05.080
<v Speaker 12>a bit of bad humor. Split humor from laughter, they're

0:13:05.120 --> 0:13:08.720
<v Speaker 12>not the same. But the way we've talked about the

0:13:08.760 --> 0:13:12.760
<v Speaker 12>two together during the three hundred years, but particularly the

0:13:12.840 --> 0:13:18.839
<v Speaker 12>last two hundred years, we've said humor and laughter are equivalent.

0:13:19.200 --> 0:13:23.080
<v Speaker 12>If there's laughter, there's been a joke, Okay, But when

0:13:23.080 --> 0:13:26.440
<v Speaker 12>you think about it, there's laughter for a range of

0:13:26.480 --> 0:13:31.120
<v Speaker 12>reasons without jokes. Okay, you tickle a baby, the baby laughs,

0:13:31.320 --> 0:13:35.440
<v Speaker 12>there's no joke. Obviously, there can be release of joy,

0:13:35.679 --> 0:13:41.040
<v Speaker 12>physical effects that are good without any joke. The Vikings

0:13:41.360 --> 0:13:45.000
<v Speaker 12>they laughed with scorn without jokes. They laughed with scorn

0:13:45.200 --> 0:13:49.559
<v Speaker 12>at enemies, and they would laugh at violence. Aristotle the

0:13:49.559 --> 0:13:53.679
<v Speaker 12>philosopher talks about how Greeks would laugh at unkliness. What

0:13:53.720 --> 0:13:57.800
<v Speaker 12>I'm pointing to is a range of different things that

0:13:58.559 --> 0:14:02.800
<v Speaker 12>we laugh at as human and as one philosopher called

0:14:02.840 --> 0:14:06.400
<v Speaker 12>Henry booksOn said, laughter is in need of an echo.

0:14:07.080 --> 0:14:09.640
<v Speaker 12>It's part of our sociality. We can laugh in our

0:14:09.679 --> 0:14:14.040
<v Speaker 12>own but when we laugh with others, we are establishing

0:14:14.080 --> 0:14:15.440
<v Speaker 12>bones with them as well.

0:14:20.280 --> 0:14:24.440
<v Speaker 1>So this segment really made me think about people like

0:14:24.600 --> 0:14:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Eric Adams, Yes, and even Curtis Leewa, who is the

0:14:29.440 --> 0:14:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Republican nominee for mayor of New York City, Like, are

0:14:33.920 --> 0:14:37.320
<v Speaker 1>we laughing with them or at them? If we're gonna

0:14:37.320 --> 0:14:40.960
<v Speaker 1>split humor and laughter a part as concepts.

0:14:41.120 --> 0:14:45.080
<v Speaker 7>Even with President Trump, Yeah, there are times where he

0:14:45.160 --> 0:14:48.040
<v Speaker 7>makes a joke that will make me laugh, and there's

0:14:48.120 --> 0:14:51.200
<v Speaker 7>times where he's not making a joke and I'm cracking out.

0:14:51.440 --> 0:14:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Yeah, I was serious. I wondered about kind of

0:14:54.960 --> 0:14:57.680
<v Speaker 1>the ratio with someone like Donald Trump, for example, Like,

0:14:58.560 --> 0:15:01.400
<v Speaker 1>if we're gonna say he's funny, maybe we want to

0:15:01.480 --> 0:15:04.240
<v Speaker 1>quantify what percentage of the things he's saying is supposed

0:15:04.240 --> 0:15:07.120
<v Speaker 1>to make you laugh versus what is just you know,

0:15:07.160 --> 0:15:08.440
<v Speaker 1>we're just like this guy's insane.

0:15:08.480 --> 0:15:11.600
<v Speaker 11>I think more than lots of left leaning people would

0:15:11.800 --> 0:15:16.560
<v Speaker 11>admit he's purposeful. Yeah, Like, I think a lot of

0:15:16.560 --> 0:15:20.200
<v Speaker 11>times he's trying to be funny and often succeeding, and

0:15:20.240 --> 0:15:24.000
<v Speaker 11>people are laughing at him, maybe thinking they're laughing at him,

0:15:24.000 --> 0:15:25.080
<v Speaker 11>but they're laughing with him.

0:15:25.160 --> 0:15:28.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, like not we're not not clocking that he is

0:15:28.880 --> 0:15:29.280
<v Speaker 1>trying to be.

0:15:29.280 --> 0:15:31.520
<v Speaker 11>Fun or like not giving credit where it's due basically

0:15:31.880 --> 0:15:35.520
<v Speaker 11>and more generally thinking about what he just said there

0:15:35.520 --> 0:15:37.840
<v Speaker 11>where it's like, I'm much more likely to laugh out

0:15:37.840 --> 0:15:40.480
<v Speaker 11>loud if I'm in a movie theater or watching something

0:15:40.520 --> 0:15:43.360
<v Speaker 11>with another person than if I'm sitting by myself watching

0:15:43.360 --> 0:15:46.520
<v Speaker 11>a movie, Like it's really hard to get a real

0:15:46.640 --> 0:15:49.200
<v Speaker 11>laugh out of me by myself. And obviously that's not

0:15:49.240 --> 0:15:51.400
<v Speaker 11>like a conscious thing, but it is something like I'm

0:15:51.440 --> 0:15:52.160
<v Speaker 11>signaling that.

0:15:52.120 --> 0:15:53.280
<v Speaker 2>I got the joke, I guess.

0:15:53.520 --> 0:15:56.880
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, it's interesting to think about that community aspect of laughter.

0:15:57.440 --> 0:15:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it makes me think of like memes, even where

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:01.880
<v Speaker 1>like the point of it is a kind of a

0:16:01.880 --> 0:16:06.400
<v Speaker 1>communal reaction to the content. So one thing I wanted

0:16:06.440 --> 0:16:09.160
<v Speaker 1>to ask doctor Rolf to do was give me a

0:16:09.200 --> 0:16:13.440
<v Speaker 1>brief overview of the history of humor in politics, because

0:16:14.000 --> 0:16:16.400
<v Speaker 1>something I learned when I was reading about his work

0:16:16.480 --> 0:16:19.880
<v Speaker 1>is that this is kind of a relatively new concept.

0:16:25.200 --> 0:16:30.680
<v Speaker 12>Much of what we know about humor started around three

0:16:30.760 --> 0:16:33.000
<v Speaker 12>hundred years ago in Britain, and we carry on many

0:16:33.040 --> 0:16:37.320
<v Speaker 12>of the ideas, especially this idea of political satire from

0:16:37.360 --> 0:16:40.640
<v Speaker 12>the British, and that went to colonial America and all

0:16:40.720 --> 0:16:44.760
<v Speaker 12>the British literature of that time. So you've got the

0:16:44.800 --> 0:16:48.520
<v Speaker 12>concept of humor, and then you get later on with

0:16:48.600 --> 0:16:52.760
<v Speaker 12>the British the idea of a national humor, and then

0:16:52.840 --> 0:16:59.240
<v Speaker 12>America imparts its twist on the idea in the eighteen seventies,

0:16:59.320 --> 0:17:02.480
<v Speaker 12>with the set of humor being a good individual thing

0:17:03.520 --> 0:17:06.480
<v Speaker 12>that a person can be admired for having a good

0:17:06.520 --> 0:17:09.280
<v Speaker 12>sense of humor and a little bit suspect for not

0:17:09.400 --> 0:17:12.480
<v Speaker 12>having a good sense of humor. So in that way,

0:17:12.720 --> 0:17:14.920
<v Speaker 12>when you look at the history of a lot of

0:17:14.960 --> 0:17:20.840
<v Speaker 12>our ideas, you find that they're not as universal as

0:17:20.880 --> 0:17:28.760
<v Speaker 12>we might think that they have really short periods in

0:17:28.840 --> 0:17:31.560
<v Speaker 12>the scheme of things. I've looked at how some of

0:17:31.600 --> 0:17:37.040
<v Speaker 12>these things went to America, and how American ideas of humor,

0:17:37.440 --> 0:17:42.399
<v Speaker 12>vaudeville and the invention of the joke that we know

0:17:42.520 --> 0:17:46.719
<v Speaker 12>today was also an invention of America in the eighteen

0:17:46.720 --> 0:17:49.840
<v Speaker 12>seventies and eighties, when you've got a huge creation of

0:17:50.119 --> 0:17:54.159
<v Speaker 12>a mass entertainment circuit going on and the creation of

0:17:54.880 --> 0:18:00.199
<v Speaker 12>joke writers. The anonymous two or three line joke that

0:18:00.240 --> 0:18:05.399
<v Speaker 12>we know today an American invention. Seta gets used these days,

0:18:05.520 --> 0:18:10.480
<v Speaker 12>particularly in America, as a means of political identity. So

0:18:11.080 --> 0:18:14.400
<v Speaker 12>a lot of Americans consume their news in a line

0:18:14.440 --> 0:18:18.639
<v Speaker 12>with their views, and they consume satire or humor in

0:18:18.680 --> 0:18:19.680
<v Speaker 12>line with their views.

0:18:20.400 --> 0:18:23.120
<v Speaker 11>As your slogan says Fox News, we read the chain

0:18:23.119 --> 0:18:25.199
<v Speaker 11>mails your grandma gets in her inbox out loud like

0:18:25.240 --> 0:18:26.040
<v Speaker 11>they were true.

0:18:26.040 --> 0:18:28.919
<v Speaker 12>And obviously it lines up with this issue of polarization

0:18:29.080 --> 0:18:29.680
<v Speaker 12>of America.

0:18:31.800 --> 0:18:35.639
<v Speaker 1>So I thought it was interesting that humor historically is

0:18:35.680 --> 0:18:38.679
<v Speaker 1>something that we use to grade like a human being,

0:18:39.000 --> 0:18:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Like you might think someone is a great person, but

0:18:40.840 --> 0:18:42.520
<v Speaker 1>if they're not funny, it's kind of suspect.

0:18:43.080 --> 0:18:46.119
<v Speaker 7>Well, even if they're not funny, then you have to

0:18:46.200 --> 0:18:50.159
<v Speaker 7>know what is funny, you know, like every dating prompt

0:18:50.160 --> 0:18:52.520
<v Speaker 7>effort is like you must have a good sense of humor,

0:18:52.600 --> 0:18:54.800
<v Speaker 7>or every love island, they're like what your type. It's like,

0:18:55.080 --> 0:18:58.080
<v Speaker 7>you know, really great banter, like great sense of humor.

0:18:58.280 --> 0:19:01.399
<v Speaker 7>So like being it if you're not the one telling jokes,

0:19:01.400 --> 0:19:04.560
<v Speaker 7>being able to laugh at jokes is very important. I

0:19:04.800 --> 0:19:07.919
<v Speaker 7>feel like it's just like a roundabout way of being like,

0:19:08.080 --> 0:19:10.159
<v Speaker 7>not like someone who has like a stick up their ass.

0:19:10.400 --> 0:19:10.760
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:19:10.920 --> 0:19:13.240
<v Speaker 1>And I also thought it was interesting that the kind

0:19:13.280 --> 0:19:17.920
<v Speaker 1>of concept of a joke is pretty new and also American.

0:19:17.920 --> 0:19:24.080
<v Speaker 7>In the seventies, I wasna say, I was going through

0:19:24.080 --> 0:19:26.479
<v Speaker 7>some stuff in my head. It's not gonna say this

0:19:26.520 --> 0:19:27.080
<v Speaker 7>guy's wrong.

0:19:28.760 --> 0:19:29.560
<v Speaker 11>How old is this guy?

0:19:30.040 --> 0:19:32.679
<v Speaker 1>And I do think he means like in a formal

0:19:33.520 --> 0:19:38.399
<v Speaker 1>like he was saying like specific was telling jokes, the

0:19:38.560 --> 0:19:40.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of anonymous as he calls it, an anonymous two

0:19:41.040 --> 0:19:41.840
<v Speaker 1>or three line joke.

0:19:43.119 --> 0:19:45.360
<v Speaker 7>The new version, the modern version of what we consider

0:19:45.359 --> 0:19:48.040
<v Speaker 7>a joke, not like the slapstick stuff of the past.

0:19:48.280 --> 0:19:52.360
<v Speaker 1>Right, So we today have our kind of modern day

0:19:52.400 --> 0:19:56.879
<v Speaker 1>examples of politicians using humor in politics. But I asked

0:19:56.920 --> 0:20:00.560
<v Speaker 1>doctor Rolf if there were any famous examples in the

0:20:00.640 --> 0:20:04.360
<v Speaker 1>past that those of us who are so young might

0:20:04.520 --> 0:20:05.720
<v Speaker 1>not be acquainted with.

0:20:11.359 --> 0:20:13.240
<v Speaker 12>You can go back to John F. Kennedy. Given what

0:20:13.280 --> 0:20:17.359
<v Speaker 12>I've said about the history before, we think more highly

0:20:17.440 --> 0:20:20.320
<v Speaker 12>a person who displays a good sense of humor, and

0:20:20.359 --> 0:20:23.760
<v Speaker 12>that's when we commend them for having wit. So we

0:20:23.800 --> 0:20:27.639
<v Speaker 12>think that they're a bit superior, bit more intellectual, a

0:20:27.720 --> 0:20:31.920
<v Speaker 12>bit more classes. That's how John Kennedy used humor.

0:20:32.440 --> 0:20:35.040
<v Speaker 4>What have you done for the women according to the

0:20:35.080 --> 0:20:37.240
<v Speaker 4>promises of the platform.

0:20:38.640 --> 0:20:39.920
<v Speaker 11>I'm sure we haven't done enough.

0:20:40.000 --> 0:20:47.960
<v Speaker 12>And so people often look back to his press conferences

0:20:48.960 --> 0:20:53.560
<v Speaker 12>in which he's charming the journalists nearby, but also the

0:20:53.600 --> 0:20:57.800
<v Speaker 12>TV viewers with his sense of humor. You've also got

0:20:58.600 --> 0:21:04.520
<v Speaker 12>ron Reagan. He employed a comedic writer called Doug Gamble,

0:21:05.080 --> 0:21:10.399
<v Speaker 12>and there was a famous line in the nineteen eighty

0:21:10.440 --> 0:21:13.760
<v Speaker 12>four election against Walter Mondo, and the issue of Ronald

0:21:13.800 --> 0:21:16.479
<v Speaker 12>Reagan's age come up. You might know the crip.

0:21:16.920 --> 0:21:19.639
<v Speaker 4>You already are the oldest president in history, and some

0:21:19.680 --> 0:21:21.800
<v Speaker 4>of your staff say you are tired after your most

0:21:21.800 --> 0:21:25.800
<v Speaker 4>recent encounter with mister Mondale. Is there any doubt in

0:21:25.840 --> 0:21:28.119
<v Speaker 4>your mind that you would be able to function in

0:21:28.160 --> 0:21:29.240
<v Speaker 4>such circumstances.

0:21:29.359 --> 0:21:32.560
<v Speaker 13>I will not make age an issue of this campaign.

0:21:32.680 --> 0:21:37.199
<v Speaker 13>I am not going to exploit for political purposes my

0:21:37.400 --> 0:21:39.360
<v Speaker 13>opponent's youth and inexperience.

0:21:41.840 --> 0:21:46.160
<v Speaker 12>That cuip was written by Doug Gamble. Doug Gamble has

0:21:46.320 --> 0:21:51.160
<v Speaker 12>also contributed some crips to Donald Trump. Some people didn't

0:21:51.200 --> 0:21:55.919
<v Speaker 12>take it quite as a joke, but he's lined about

0:21:56.000 --> 0:21:59.840
<v Speaker 12>oh jijimping being president for life is now.

0:22:03.359 --> 0:22:05.000
<v Speaker 5>They wanted to give that a shout some day.

0:22:07.359 --> 0:22:09.920
<v Speaker 12>Okay, that came from Doug Gamble. Those are some of

0:22:09.960 --> 0:22:12.920
<v Speaker 12>the ways in which politicians can use HUMA, as well

0:22:12.960 --> 0:22:17.680
<v Speaker 12>as using CUMA as an attack dog against opponents.

0:22:23.400 --> 0:22:26.280
<v Speaker 1>So I knew politicians could be funny naturally, but I

0:22:26.280 --> 0:22:30.240
<v Speaker 1>didn't know that they were like actually hiring comedians, not

0:22:30.359 --> 0:22:32.880
<v Speaker 1>really to make their speeches funny, but to just have

0:22:33.000 --> 0:22:34.680
<v Speaker 1>little bits here and there.

0:22:35.560 --> 0:22:36.719
<v Speaker 5>Yeah I need to do that.

0:22:37.800 --> 0:22:39.560
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, my guy over here, this.

0:22:41.400 --> 0:22:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Guy Doug Gamble, who wrote that famous line for Reagan,

0:22:45.880 --> 0:22:48.680
<v Speaker 1>who's also seems to be still around writing stuff for

0:22:48.880 --> 0:22:53.719
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump. So sometimes, you know, we hear some silly

0:22:53.760 --> 0:22:56.359
<v Speaker 1>thing from a politician and we think, wow, this guy's

0:22:56.400 --> 0:22:59.920
<v Speaker 1>on one, but it actually could be written from some comedian.

0:23:00.040 --> 0:23:03.120
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, you're written Pomo should have used Doug in his

0:23:03.200 --> 0:23:05.560
<v Speaker 7>last debate against Zorn because he did not have some

0:23:05.560 --> 0:23:06.360
<v Speaker 7>some good coming.

0:23:06.400 --> 0:23:08.800
<v Speaker 11>Biden should have hired that guy before. I didn't realize

0:23:08.840 --> 0:23:09.600
<v Speaker 11>Trump had used him.

0:23:09.840 --> 0:23:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he's like talking about old Yeah, all right, So

0:23:13.800 --> 0:23:16.480
<v Speaker 1>we learned a lot about kind of the history of

0:23:16.680 --> 0:23:20.800
<v Speaker 1>the utilization of comedy in politics. Is that a word utilization,

0:23:20.920 --> 0:23:24.960
<v Speaker 1>about use? The use over complicating it. We learned a

0:23:24.960 --> 0:23:28.440
<v Speaker 1>lot about the use of comedy in politics in history.

0:23:28.520 --> 0:23:30.000
<v Speaker 1>But now I think it'd be a good idea to

0:23:30.119 --> 0:23:33.400
<v Speaker 1>talk to an actual comedian, you know, get their thoughts

0:23:33.520 --> 0:23:36.520
<v Speaker 1>about why some of this stuff lands, why some of

0:23:36.560 --> 0:23:40.200
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't. And famously, there's a popular podcast that does

0:23:40.480 --> 0:23:42.480
<v Speaker 1>just that where they work on jokes in real time.

0:23:42.560 --> 0:23:46.080
<v Speaker 1>It's called Mike Brobiglia's working it out. So after the break,

0:23:46.080 --> 0:23:47.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to head over to the studio where he

0:23:47.920 --> 0:24:01.199
<v Speaker 1>records that podcast and talk to Mike. All right, we

0:24:01.359 --> 0:24:05.320
<v Speaker 1>are back. This is Manny and this is my conversation

0:24:05.480 --> 0:24:08.160
<v Speaker 1>with comedian Mike or Biglia.

0:24:10.800 --> 0:24:12.399
<v Speaker 5>Thanks for doing this, Mike, Oh yeah, thank you.

0:24:12.840 --> 0:24:15.560
<v Speaker 1>I've been doing a little bit of studying about the

0:24:15.680 --> 0:24:19.440
<v Speaker 1>usage of humor and comedy in politics for like the

0:24:19.520 --> 0:24:22.679
<v Speaker 1>last one hundred years or so. Wow, And I've been

0:24:22.720 --> 0:24:26.919
<v Speaker 1>surprised to learn that politicians used to quite frequently hire

0:24:27.040 --> 0:24:32.560
<v Speaker 1>comedians to either appear wittier or in some instances like

0:24:32.640 --> 0:24:37.520
<v Speaker 1>specifically write jokes for them. JFK hired a comedian to

0:24:37.800 --> 0:24:40.439
<v Speaker 1>kind of appear smarter on the on the campaign trail,

0:24:41.200 --> 0:24:44.800
<v Speaker 1>and then some politicians like Ron Reagan actually had comedians

0:24:45.240 --> 0:24:48.359
<v Speaker 1>write specific jokes for him. There's a famous instance where

0:24:48.400 --> 0:24:52.440
<v Speaker 1>Walter Mondale kind of cracks at Reagan for being too old,

0:24:52.640 --> 0:24:54.640
<v Speaker 1>and his response is that he's not going to use

0:24:55.400 --> 0:24:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Walter's inexperience against him, and that was actually written by

0:24:59.119 --> 0:25:02.159
<v Speaker 1>a comedian. So I guess my first question is, like,

0:25:02.240 --> 0:25:06.320
<v Speaker 1>have you heard of this happening today? Have you ever

0:25:06.359 --> 0:25:10.280
<v Speaker 1>been asked to kind of punch up a politician's speech.

0:25:10.880 --> 0:25:14.560
<v Speaker 2>I've been asked, I think I have before. I think

0:25:14.600 --> 0:25:20.160
<v Speaker 2>I've maybe submitted jokes maybe during debates or something.

0:25:21.000 --> 0:25:22.760
<v Speaker 1>So this is like debate training almost.

0:25:23.000 --> 0:25:25.720
<v Speaker 2>I don't think any of mine were used. I also

0:25:25.800 --> 0:25:28.320
<v Speaker 2>didn't take it very seriously. Yeah, Like I don't think

0:25:28.359 --> 0:25:30.480
<v Speaker 2>I was very focused on it or and I don't

0:25:30.480 --> 0:25:32.919
<v Speaker 2>think I was in the inner circle of it. I

0:25:33.000 --> 0:25:37.439
<v Speaker 2>find the assignment to be hard. Yeah, political comedy, I

0:25:37.480 --> 0:25:38.399
<v Speaker 2>just find it to be hard.

0:25:39.240 --> 0:25:42.160
<v Speaker 1>What about it is hard? Is harder than, for example,

0:25:42.480 --> 0:25:44.440
<v Speaker 1>being in a room like a stand up comedy show.

0:25:44.480 --> 0:25:47.960
<v Speaker 2>It's funny, like I heard John Stuart describe it recently

0:25:49.480 --> 0:25:51.600
<v Speaker 2>in an interview with The New Yorker where he said,

0:25:53.359 --> 0:25:56.200
<v Speaker 2>you look at Trump and it's like he's not funny,

0:25:56.400 --> 0:25:59.920
<v Speaker 2>but he has a funny cadence. And I think that

0:26:00.400 --> 0:26:04.960
<v Speaker 2>combined the cadence he's like an entertainer's cadence, combined with

0:26:05.720 --> 0:26:10.959
<v Speaker 2>a complete and total willingness to say anything, regardless of

0:26:11.160 --> 0:26:16.439
<v Speaker 2>any meaning whatsoever. Yeah, and I think he's able to

0:26:16.480 --> 0:26:21.359
<v Speaker 2>pull that off, and not many people are because people

0:26:21.400 --> 0:26:26.080
<v Speaker 2>have integrity. There's not that many people with that little integrity,

0:26:26.280 --> 0:26:26.439
<v Speaker 2>you know.

0:26:26.440 --> 0:26:26.800
<v Speaker 5>What I mean.

0:26:27.160 --> 0:26:32.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's a unique and some people call shame. No shame, right,

0:26:32.960 --> 0:26:40.600
<v Speaker 2>And it's like interestingly seeing Newsome mimic it on Twitter

0:26:40.760 --> 0:26:43.720
<v Speaker 2>has been fascinating to me because I think it has

0:26:43.840 --> 0:26:48.800
<v Speaker 2>defanged Trump a little bit because it shows the trick

0:26:49.240 --> 0:26:52.439
<v Speaker 2>and the trick is just bombast. The trick is just

0:26:52.680 --> 0:26:56.960
<v Speaker 2>all caps bomb bast pomp, and it's like, Oh, that's

0:26:57.040 --> 0:27:01.400
<v Speaker 2>not hard. That's an intern just wrote like, I don't

0:27:01.440 --> 0:27:06.080
<v Speaker 2>think Avin Newsom's writing these bombastic tweets. Yeah, this wouldn't be.

0:27:06.080 --> 0:27:06.600
<v Speaker 2>My guess.

0:27:06.760 --> 0:27:09.720
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people I know find Trump to be funny.

0:27:09.880 --> 0:27:12.880
<v Speaker 1>I debate my friends whether we're laughing at or with Trump. Sure,

0:27:13.480 --> 0:27:16.240
<v Speaker 1>is there some sense from the public maybe that it's like, wow,

0:27:16.280 --> 0:27:18.560
<v Speaker 1>I wish I could say the things that Trump says,

0:27:18.760 --> 0:27:21.520
<v Speaker 1>or that he's like kind of crossing boundaries that might

0:27:21.560 --> 0:27:22.800
<v Speaker 1>feel freeing to people.

0:27:23.720 --> 0:27:26.119
<v Speaker 2>I've heard different theories on it, and I don't know

0:27:26.160 --> 0:27:30.360
<v Speaker 2>which is true, but I've heard, like one theory is

0:27:30.400 --> 0:27:36.040
<v Speaker 2>that people have, for thirty forty years and maybe longer,

0:27:36.160 --> 0:27:39.880
<v Speaker 2>maybe one hundred years, have felt so lied to by

0:27:39.960 --> 0:27:46.400
<v Speaker 2>politicians that there's something in it where they go, well,

0:27:46.480 --> 0:27:50.240
<v Speaker 2>at least here's all the raw footage of the documentary,

0:27:50.720 --> 0:27:53.320
<v Speaker 2>and then we can cut our own from it.

0:27:53.400 --> 0:27:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you know what I mean.

0:27:54.359 --> 0:27:57.879
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Like, here's the lies, here's the truths, here's the everything.

0:27:58.920 --> 0:28:01.959
<v Speaker 2>I'm unloading the clip up, you figure it out. Yeah,

0:28:02.040 --> 0:28:04.359
<v Speaker 2>And it's a little bit in the kind of do

0:28:04.440 --> 0:28:07.679
<v Speaker 2>your own research realm where people are like, oh, okay,

0:28:07.800 --> 0:28:12.000
<v Speaker 2>I can make sense of this nonsense, I think. I mean,

0:28:12.040 --> 0:28:14.520
<v Speaker 2>I think that's part of the appeal from someone who

0:28:14.600 --> 0:28:16.120
<v Speaker 2>for whom it does not appeal.

0:28:16.000 --> 0:28:17.959
<v Speaker 1>Right, And you touched on this a little bit already,

0:28:17.960 --> 0:28:21.280
<v Speaker 1>But why is the kind of Gavin Newsome strategy? Why

0:28:21.280 --> 0:28:22.680
<v Speaker 1>do you think is resonating with some people?

0:28:22.680 --> 0:28:24.560
<v Speaker 2>I see a lot of I think, yeah, I think

0:28:24.560 --> 0:28:28.000
<v Speaker 2>it resonates because it reveals what Trump does as a trick.

0:28:27.960 --> 0:28:31.080
<v Speaker 1>So demystifies. It's like seeing how a magician does, like

0:28:31.119 --> 0:28:32.120
<v Speaker 1>a card trick or something.

0:28:32.200 --> 0:28:32.360
<v Speaker 11>Yeah.

0:28:32.359 --> 0:28:35.840
<v Speaker 2>Plus he's a governor and so there's like it's high stakes.

0:28:36.320 --> 0:28:39.200
<v Speaker 2>It's higher stakes in if Mike Berbiglia the comedian did

0:28:39.240 --> 0:28:42.120
<v Speaker 2>the bunch of all caps tweets, which I'm sure comedians

0:28:42.160 --> 0:28:44.640
<v Speaker 2>have done, you know, I'm sure that that's out there

0:28:45.120 --> 0:28:48.240
<v Speaker 2>as a trope, but like him doing it from this

0:28:48.640 --> 0:28:52.400
<v Speaker 2>stately position, like does feel consequential?

0:28:52.520 --> 0:28:56.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I guess from a kind of a zoomed out perspective,

0:28:56.960 --> 0:28:59.080
<v Speaker 1>what do you think it is about? Like someone having

0:28:59.120 --> 0:29:04.920
<v Speaker 1>a good sense of humor that signals a level of authenticity,

0:29:05.280 --> 0:29:07.560
<v Speaker 1>like when some politicians, as we're going to get into

0:29:07.560 --> 0:29:10.080
<v Speaker 1>in a second attempt humor and ya want to fall

0:29:10.160 --> 0:29:13.160
<v Speaker 1>short the public consensus is kind of that they are fake,

0:29:13.240 --> 0:29:15.840
<v Speaker 1>are there manufacturer? Or this is like a focus group tested,

0:29:16.040 --> 0:29:19.120
<v Speaker 1>there's some inauthenticity. So what is it about a good

0:29:19.160 --> 0:29:21.000
<v Speaker 1>sense of humor that makes people feel like, wow, this

0:29:21.120 --> 0:29:22.240
<v Speaker 1>is like a real human being.

0:29:22.880 --> 0:29:26.440
<v Speaker 2>I think that great jokes are based in an observation

0:29:27.320 --> 0:29:33.480
<v Speaker 2>that is either true or feels true. And so when

0:29:33.880 --> 0:29:37.360
<v Speaker 2>a politician is observing something that people have feel like

0:29:37.480 --> 0:29:42.560
<v Speaker 2>they've observed, there's a sense of like, well, we're watching

0:29:42.600 --> 0:29:43.920
<v Speaker 2>the same reality here.

0:29:44.160 --> 0:29:44.800
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:29:45.000 --> 0:29:48.200
<v Speaker 2>I think that there is something where there have been

0:29:48.280 --> 0:29:52.200
<v Speaker 2>some politicians without naming names in the last thirty years

0:29:52.320 --> 0:29:56.760
<v Speaker 2>where they were not able to read the room and

0:29:56.840 --> 0:30:01.480
<v Speaker 2>as a result, people really like lost faith in them,

0:30:01.520 --> 0:30:03.840
<v Speaker 2>Like you know, a famous example, actually this does name

0:30:03.960 --> 0:30:07.600
<v Speaker 2>names is the George W. Bush Mission accomplished right where

0:30:07.640 --> 0:30:09.960
<v Speaker 2>it's kind of a tone deaf. Yeah, everyone's just going, what,

0:30:10.880 --> 0:30:12.000
<v Speaker 2>there's all these people dead?

0:30:12.760 --> 0:30:13.840
<v Speaker 5>What are you talking about?

0:30:14.400 --> 0:30:16.520
<v Speaker 2>And I think that that and the opposite of that

0:30:16.600 --> 0:30:21.120
<v Speaker 2>is when someone is funny or nails a truth in

0:30:21.160 --> 0:30:23.320
<v Speaker 2>a moment or what feels like a truth in a moment,

0:30:24.120 --> 0:30:26.560
<v Speaker 2>I you know, I mean even like the speech that

0:30:26.600 --> 0:30:31.000
<v Speaker 2>all these people criticized, which is like Trump's I want

0:30:31.040 --> 0:30:33.560
<v Speaker 2>to say it's a inauguration like seventeen or something. Was

0:30:33.640 --> 0:30:34.640
<v Speaker 2>the carnage speech.

0:30:34.800 --> 0:30:42.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, this American carnage stops right here and stops right now.

0:30:42.880 --> 0:30:44.800
<v Speaker 2>A lot of people were like, Oh, it's so dark

0:30:44.840 --> 0:30:47.000
<v Speaker 2>and so this and so that. Well yeah, but also

0:30:47.160 --> 0:30:48.960
<v Speaker 2>like some people's lives are really dark.

0:30:50.040 --> 0:30:52.760
<v Speaker 1>It's like painting a picture to them that felt familiar.

0:30:53.080 --> 0:30:57.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So I actually think I criticize ninety nine percent

0:30:57.320 --> 0:30:59.960
<v Speaker 2>of what Trump does. That speech. I actually found like, Eh,

0:31:00.200 --> 0:31:03.840
<v Speaker 2>it's not for me, but it's hitting with some people.

0:31:03.920 --> 0:31:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and you understood why it was resonating. So on

0:31:07.720 --> 0:31:09.320
<v Speaker 1>your show, you do a lot of kind of like

0:31:09.360 --> 0:31:12.080
<v Speaker 1>working on all yeah, which is a lot of fun

0:31:12.120 --> 0:31:15.240
<v Speaker 1>to listen to and to better kind of understand the

0:31:15.320 --> 0:31:17.560
<v Speaker 1>dynamic here that that we've been talking about. I love

0:31:17.640 --> 0:31:21.000
<v Speaker 1>to do a quick experiment with you. I've brought a

0:31:21.040 --> 0:31:25.560
<v Speaker 1>couple of jokes from politicians in the past couple of years,

0:31:25.600 --> 0:31:28.400
<v Speaker 1>and I'd love to get your sense of like why

0:31:28.440 --> 0:31:30.560
<v Speaker 1>they didn't work and what you might do to help

0:31:30.600 --> 0:31:33.600
<v Speaker 1>them if you were hired to write them. All Right,

0:31:33.680 --> 0:31:35.320
<v Speaker 1>So the first one is from J. D. E.

0:31:35.440 --> 0:31:35.720
<v Speaker 10>Vance.

0:31:35.800 --> 0:31:37.680
<v Speaker 1>This is when he was on the campaign trail.

0:31:38.120 --> 0:31:42.040
<v Speaker 15>Democrats say that it is racist to believe. Well, they

0:31:42.080 --> 0:31:44.960
<v Speaker 15>say it's racist to do anything. I had a die

0:31:45.040 --> 0:31:47.720
<v Speaker 15>Mountain Dew yesterday and one today. I'm sure they're gonna

0:31:47.760 --> 0:31:57.200
<v Speaker 15>call that racist too, But it's good. I love you guys.

0:32:02.800 --> 0:32:06.160
<v Speaker 2>I love you guys. That's a tough one. Yeah, I

0:32:06.160 --> 0:32:10.120
<v Speaker 2>mean it's it's clearly it's a great example of someone

0:32:10.160 --> 0:32:13.800
<v Speaker 2>who is surrounded by people who agree with him all

0:32:13.840 --> 0:32:14.200
<v Speaker 2>the time.

0:32:15.000 --> 0:32:15.200
<v Speaker 5>Right.

0:32:15.560 --> 0:32:18.400
<v Speaker 2>It's like, I actually think that one of the keys

0:32:18.400 --> 0:32:22.040
<v Speaker 2>to being a decent comedian is playing for crowds who

0:32:22.120 --> 0:32:26.680
<v Speaker 2>aren't dying to hear what you say next. Because I

0:32:26.760 --> 0:32:30.400
<v Speaker 2>do a mixture of shows like when I'm on tour,

0:32:31.520 --> 0:32:36.920
<v Speaker 2>it's meaningful for my process. But I know that those

0:32:36.960 --> 0:32:40.840
<v Speaker 2>people have watched my other six specials and they get

0:32:40.880 --> 0:32:45.000
<v Speaker 2>the tone of what I'm doing, and they right, And

0:32:45.080 --> 0:32:49.040
<v Speaker 2>so I like, it's an inside joke. I know that

0:32:49.120 --> 0:32:52.440
<v Speaker 2>they know that I know that I'm joking about this,

0:32:52.440 --> 0:32:55.480
<v Speaker 2>this and this, and that these four things we can

0:32:55.520 --> 0:32:56.280
<v Speaker 2>accept to be true.

0:32:56.360 --> 0:32:56.719
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:32:56.760 --> 0:32:58.760
<v Speaker 2>And then I also played the comedy Celler in New

0:32:58.840 --> 0:33:02.440
<v Speaker 2>York and others like it. Where I'm not on the bill,

0:33:03.400 --> 0:33:06.760
<v Speaker 2>I pop up. I would saying most people don't know

0:33:06.760 --> 0:33:08.719
<v Speaker 2>who I am, or at least half don't know who

0:33:08.800 --> 0:33:11.000
<v Speaker 2>I am, And so you get what I think of

0:33:11.040 --> 0:33:14.040
<v Speaker 2>as like a true bounce like in tennis, true bounce

0:33:14.040 --> 0:33:17.719
<v Speaker 2>of the ball or basketball, like yeah, where you go? Okay,

0:33:17.840 --> 0:33:20.880
<v Speaker 2>kind of an unbiased, blank slate. Yeah, this is Yeah,

0:33:20.920 --> 0:33:24.880
<v Speaker 2>this is how this reads to people. And so that

0:33:25.120 --> 0:33:27.840
<v Speaker 2>the g Van's clip is a great example of like

0:33:28.040 --> 0:33:32.560
<v Speaker 2>it's very telling. Yeah, he's clearly surrounded by people for

0:33:32.680 --> 0:33:36.960
<v Speaker 2>whom they believe everything is construed as racist all the time. Yeah,

0:33:37.400 --> 0:33:42.920
<v Speaker 2>even a diet mountain dew, which is a really tricky analogy.

0:33:43.000 --> 0:33:46.760
<v Speaker 2>I don't even know what the joke is. Yeah, can

0:33:46.800 --> 0:33:47.240
<v Speaker 2>you explain.

0:33:47.360 --> 0:33:49.880
<v Speaker 1>I guess that's what I was looking. I was seeking

0:33:49.920 --> 0:33:52.920
<v Speaker 1>information on. I think he's clearly, after telling the joke,

0:33:53.000 --> 0:33:56.280
<v Speaker 1>waiting for action. Yeah, the diet mountain de I don't know.

0:33:56.320 --> 0:33:59.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm from Ohio as well. I drank mountain dew growing up.

0:33:59.360 --> 0:34:01.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't, I don't. I didn't see what was going

0:34:01.760 --> 0:34:02.600
<v Speaker 1>on here in the.

0:34:02.560 --> 0:34:07.280
<v Speaker 2>Mag I'm unaware of any racial implications of mountain dew

0:34:08.160 --> 0:34:12.359
<v Speaker 2>nor diet mountain. Yeah, so I would say, like zoom out.

0:34:12.440 --> 0:34:14.960
<v Speaker 2>If he's playing to his bass and he wants to

0:34:15.000 --> 0:34:17.719
<v Speaker 2>make a joke about how everyone calls everything racist all

0:34:17.719 --> 0:34:20.879
<v Speaker 2>the time. I would pick something that has a racial implication. Yeah, Yeah,

0:34:21.120 --> 0:34:23.279
<v Speaker 2>choose a product that has a racial implication. People can

0:34:23.320 --> 0:34:26.960
<v Speaker 2>call me racist for blank filling the blank product that whatever.

0:34:27.320 --> 0:34:32.040
<v Speaker 2>So that's for playing for his bass, for playing like wider.

0:34:32.640 --> 0:34:35.520
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. It's almost like you'd have to nail

0:34:36.520 --> 0:34:42.839
<v Speaker 2>the perfect thing culturally that people are annoyed at, yeah,

0:34:42.880 --> 0:34:45.239
<v Speaker 2>because they've heard it called racist, and we all know

0:34:45.800 --> 0:34:46.440
<v Speaker 2>that's a bit.

0:34:46.400 --> 0:34:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Much, right. What confused me is that this is an

0:34:49.160 --> 0:34:53.360
<v Speaker 1>audience ostensibly rooting for him, like wanting to be entertained

0:34:53.360 --> 0:34:57.040
<v Speaker 1>by truly bombing. Yeah, to be fair to JdE e Vance,

0:34:57.040 --> 0:34:59.359
<v Speaker 1>which is a sentiment I've never had in my life

0:34:59.400 --> 0:35:01.719
<v Speaker 1>and probably never will again. How much of this could

0:35:01.800 --> 0:35:04.520
<v Speaker 1>be that some jokes fall flat on some cross I'm

0:35:04.560 --> 0:35:07.600
<v Speaker 1>sure you've had experiences before where you've told the same

0:35:07.680 --> 0:35:10.840
<v Speaker 1>joke to two different rooms and gotten two completely different reactions.

0:35:10.880 --> 0:35:12.080
<v Speaker 1>As you're touching on earlier.

0:35:12.000 --> 0:35:15.239
<v Speaker 2>Certainly, but but that joke is just not gonna work.

0:35:16.320 --> 0:35:19.839
<v Speaker 2>I think that, honestly. It's it's that he's surrounded by

0:35:19.880 --> 0:35:24.520
<v Speaker 2>sick offens who are just laughing on every word he's saying, yeah,

0:35:24.600 --> 0:35:26.920
<v Speaker 2>versus listening to the content of what he's saying. What

0:35:27.040 --> 0:35:31.760
<v Speaker 2>a deeply unfunny person too, I mean he is really,

0:35:32.280 --> 0:35:33.160
<v Speaker 2>he doesn't have it.

0:35:33.960 --> 0:35:36.920
<v Speaker 1>I've got one more for you, okay, and this and

0:35:36.960 --> 0:35:38.560
<v Speaker 1>should be fair. You know that was someone on the right.

0:35:38.600 --> 0:35:39.640
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna pick someone on the left.

0:35:39.719 --> 0:35:39.959
<v Speaker 5>Now.

0:35:40.640 --> 0:35:43.560
<v Speaker 1>We've got a joke here from Amy Klobatar and uh,

0:35:44.160 --> 0:35:45.440
<v Speaker 1>it's a little bit of a compilation.

0:35:46.280 --> 0:35:49.040
<v Speaker 14>The President actually sent out a tweet he made fun

0:35:49.040 --> 0:35:52.000
<v Speaker 14>of me for talking about climate change in the middle

0:35:52.000 --> 0:35:56.920
<v Speaker 14>of a blizzard, and he called me snow woman. So

0:35:57.120 --> 0:36:00.279
<v Speaker 14>I wrote back, Hey, Donald Trump, the science is on

0:36:00.320 --> 0:36:03.279
<v Speaker 14>my side, and I'd like to see how your hair

0:36:03.360 --> 0:36:08.000
<v Speaker 14>would fair in a blizzard. So I wrote back, Hey,

0:36:08.120 --> 0:36:11.240
<v Speaker 14>Donald Trump, the science is on my side, and I'd

0:36:11.280 --> 0:36:13.440
<v Speaker 14>like to see how your hair would.

0:36:13.200 --> 0:36:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Fair in a blizzard.

0:36:15.440 --> 0:36:19.879
<v Speaker 8>So I wrote back, Donald Trump, the science is on

0:36:19.960 --> 0:36:24.399
<v Speaker 8>my side, and I'd like to see how your hair

0:36:24.480 --> 0:36:26.239
<v Speaker 8>would fair in a blizzard.

0:36:27.280 --> 0:36:29.600
<v Speaker 1>And you get the picture this. She's done this maybe

0:36:29.600 --> 0:36:31.759
<v Speaker 1>one hundred times, the same joke, over and over, and

0:36:31.840 --> 0:36:35.000
<v Speaker 1>just for the listener. During that clip, Mike had his

0:36:35.239 --> 0:36:35.759
<v Speaker 1>head in his.

0:36:37.880 --> 0:36:39.800
<v Speaker 2>I don't even like, get the jokes? Can you explain

0:36:39.920 --> 0:36:40.520
<v Speaker 2>the joke to me?

0:36:40.880 --> 0:36:44.920
<v Speaker 1>He at one point was criticizing the Democrats for like

0:36:45.040 --> 0:36:47.880
<v Speaker 1>drumming up climate change as like a real thing. Of

0:36:47.880 --> 0:36:50.560
<v Speaker 1>course it is. And I guess this is her response,

0:36:50.920 --> 0:36:52.800
<v Speaker 1>if you don't think climate change is real, well, I

0:36:52.800 --> 0:36:55.319
<v Speaker 1>would like to see what your hair would be doing

0:36:55.400 --> 0:36:58.600
<v Speaker 1>in the blizzards that are happening more often. I guess

0:36:59.080 --> 0:37:00.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm very confused as well.

0:37:00.440 --> 0:37:03.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's a tricky one. I like Senator Klobsher a lot,

0:37:03.200 --> 0:37:05.600
<v Speaker 2>but that one is clearly.

0:37:05.400 --> 0:37:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Maybe this is can't come from someone on her team

0:37:07.800 --> 0:37:09.080
<v Speaker 1>or right.

0:37:09.640 --> 0:37:14.200
<v Speaker 2>I performed a couple fundraisers in the last election, and

0:37:14.239 --> 0:37:17.520
<v Speaker 2>I say, people make fun of us in the city.

0:37:17.520 --> 0:37:20.520
<v Speaker 2>They call us coastal elites, just because we live on

0:37:20.520 --> 0:37:23.000
<v Speaker 2>a coast and we're better than other people. And in fairness,

0:37:23.000 --> 0:37:25.440
<v Speaker 2>part of the time we live in Aspen. And it's like,

0:37:25.760 --> 0:37:29.799
<v Speaker 2>I think, with jokes, you you need a target. I

0:37:29.840 --> 0:37:32.600
<v Speaker 2>did a special for Netflix years ago called Thank Cover Jokes,

0:37:32.960 --> 0:37:35.799
<v Speaker 2>and essentially one of the key points in it is

0:37:35.840 --> 0:37:41.239
<v Speaker 2>like all jokes are aimed at someone or something, like

0:37:41.400 --> 0:37:43.240
<v Speaker 2>all all jokes are offensive to some.

0:37:43.360 --> 0:37:44.360
<v Speaker 1>Target, like as a target.

0:37:44.480 --> 0:37:47.399
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, every joke if you think about it, unless it's

0:37:47.560 --> 0:37:51.560
<v Speaker 2>just nonsense, which is its own genre, like unless it's abstract.

0:37:52.080 --> 0:37:56.040
<v Speaker 2>But it's interesting hearing her take aim at Trump in

0:37:56.080 --> 0:38:01.200
<v Speaker 2>that way because it's like it just doesn't land. And

0:38:01.280 --> 0:38:06.359
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't land because so many jokes have been made

0:38:07.120 --> 0:38:10.759
<v Speaker 2>about his hair, about his skin, about his whatever like that.

0:38:11.239 --> 0:38:14.520
<v Speaker 2>You know, orange skins his hairs are two pays.

0:38:14.520 --> 0:38:14.759
<v Speaker 11>You know.

0:38:15.239 --> 0:38:19.000
<v Speaker 1>And to your point, it is kind of unclear initially

0:38:19.040 --> 0:38:21.759
<v Speaker 1>what the target of the joke is. Yes, I guess

0:38:21.800 --> 0:38:23.960
<v Speaker 1>everyone's hair would kind of be going.

0:38:23.719 --> 0:38:29.239
<v Speaker 2>On, right, and it's it's but it's it's a real quandary.

0:38:29.840 --> 0:38:33.319
<v Speaker 2>I would say, four people who are on the other

0:38:33.400 --> 0:38:36.239
<v Speaker 2>side of him to make jokes at his expense, because

0:38:36.280 --> 0:38:40.200
<v Speaker 2>it's like it's all done, it's all been done. I mean,

0:38:40.680 --> 0:38:43.000
<v Speaker 2>it's part of the reason I don't go into political

0:38:43.280 --> 0:38:46.239
<v Speaker 2>comedy realm right now. I did a little bit when

0:38:46.280 --> 0:38:49.319
<v Speaker 2>George W. Bush was president. The only reason I did

0:38:50.040 --> 0:38:52.239
<v Speaker 2>was that someone was opening up for me in Pittsburgh

0:38:52.560 --> 0:38:55.160
<v Speaker 2>and they were doing all this pro George W. Bush

0:38:55.239 --> 0:38:57.440
<v Speaker 2>material interesting And I've never been in the habit of

0:38:57.520 --> 0:39:00.319
<v Speaker 2>censoring anyone. Yeah, so I didn't say, hey, could you

0:39:00.440 --> 0:39:04.880
<v Speaker 2>not do them, so instead, I wrote a joke about

0:39:04.880 --> 0:39:06.720
<v Speaker 2>Georgia B. Bush and that ended up on my album

0:39:06.760 --> 0:39:10.200
<v Speaker 2>To Drink Mike, and the premise is it's like Georgie W.

0:39:10.360 --> 0:39:12.520
<v Speaker 2>Bush is like the guy who shows up at the

0:39:12.560 --> 0:39:18.320
<v Speaker 2>barbecue and starts the whiffle ball game. He's a wiffleball tony.

0:39:18.320 --> 0:39:19.960
<v Speaker 2>He's like, hey, y'all want to play wiffle ball? And

0:39:19.960 --> 0:39:22.960
<v Speaker 2>then they played through the analogy with WMD's and all that,

0:39:23.000 --> 0:39:26.800
<v Speaker 2>and I have not. It was interesting about that joke

0:39:26.960 --> 0:39:29.800
<v Speaker 2>is that played in the South in the middle of

0:39:29.840 --> 0:39:35.680
<v Speaker 2>the country, partly because it was so silly, like, yeah,

0:39:35.719 --> 0:39:39.719
<v Speaker 2>it's kind of absurd, it's absurd, similar to mulaney horse

0:39:39.719 --> 0:39:40.680
<v Speaker 2>in the hospital bit.

0:39:40.800 --> 0:39:44.160
<v Speaker 6>This guy being the president, it's like there's a horse

0:39:44.960 --> 0:39:49.880
<v Speaker 6>loose in a hospital. It's like, there's a horse loose

0:39:49.920 --> 0:39:53.600
<v Speaker 6>in a hospital. I think eventually everything's gonna be okay,

0:39:54.000 --> 0:39:57.920
<v Speaker 6>but I have no idea what's gonna happen next, and

0:39:58.040 --> 0:40:00.680
<v Speaker 6>neither do any of you, and neither do you parents.

0:40:00.719 --> 0:40:04.759
<v Speaker 6>Because there's a horse loose in the hospital.

0:40:04.440 --> 0:40:07.319
<v Speaker 2>And there is something that he's capturing that even a

0:40:07.360 --> 0:40:10.640
<v Speaker 2>Trump supporter I think would not disagree with, which is

0:40:10.680 --> 0:40:13.600
<v Speaker 2>it's just chaotic. Yeah, and there's a point to it. Yeah,

0:40:13.600 --> 0:40:17.440
<v Speaker 2>it's fun. You can't dispute. There's chaos with this president.

0:40:17.680 --> 0:40:20.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we just did two jokes that you punched up.

0:40:20.480 --> 0:40:22.319
<v Speaker 1>I wondered if you have time to listen to one

0:40:22.760 --> 0:40:25.400
<v Speaker 1>from Trump, I would like to know why it works. Actually,

0:40:25.480 --> 0:40:27.279
<v Speaker 1>that's a lot of people find this clip to be

0:40:27.280 --> 0:40:30.640
<v Speaker 1>really funny, and I do too, if I'm being honest. Wow, yeah,

0:40:31.239 --> 0:40:35.399
<v Speaker 1>I contain multitudes. So this this joke I see gets

0:40:35.400 --> 0:40:38.720
<v Speaker 1>circulated often on X for example, where people be like, okay,

0:40:38.760 --> 0:40:40.719
<v Speaker 1>you got to hand it to him. In some instances,

0:40:41.040 --> 0:40:42.320
<v Speaker 1>would we be better off?

0:40:42.480 --> 0:40:44.680
<v Speaker 4>As an example, in a wreck, what are we doing?

0:40:45.040 --> 0:40:47.120
<v Speaker 4>It's like I saw somebody I won't even say because

0:40:47.120 --> 0:40:50.399
<v Speaker 4>it's embarrassing. We want it where the women over there

0:40:50.440 --> 0:40:52.279
<v Speaker 4>don't have to wear the you know what? Then I

0:40:52.280 --> 0:40:54.960
<v Speaker 4>saw women interviewed. They said, we want to wear them.

0:40:54.960 --> 0:40:58.280
<v Speaker 4>We've worn them for a thousand years. Why would anybody

0:40:58.280 --> 0:40:58.920
<v Speaker 4>tell us not to?

0:40:59.200 --> 0:40:59.799
<v Speaker 1>They want to?

0:41:00.640 --> 0:41:03.080
<v Speaker 4>What the hell are we getting involved for? In fact,

0:41:03.120 --> 0:41:04.920
<v Speaker 4>it's easier. You don't have to put up makeup. Look

0:41:04.920 --> 0:41:08.359
<v Speaker 4>how beautiful everyone looks. Wouldn't it be easy if wa right?

0:41:08.560 --> 0:41:10.279
<v Speaker 4>I'll tell you if I was a woman, I don't

0:41:10.280 --> 0:41:13.240
<v Speaker 4>want to Wah, I'm ready, darling, let's go true.

0:41:14.080 --> 0:41:16.920
<v Speaker 1>What is it about this one that's like some people

0:41:16.920 --> 0:41:19.000
<v Speaker 1>are like, Okay, I can see the humor in this.

0:41:19.320 --> 0:41:22.880
<v Speaker 2>In my opinion, it appeals to the audience's sense of

0:41:23.000 --> 0:41:25.959
<v Speaker 2>wanting him to be right. So, if I were gonna

0:41:25.960 --> 0:41:27.480
<v Speaker 2>guess as to the people in the audience and the

0:41:27.520 --> 0:41:30.640
<v Speaker 2>people posting it are isolationists, they don't think we should

0:41:30.640 --> 0:41:33.440
<v Speaker 2>be in foreign wars, et cetera. And then here's this

0:41:33.480 --> 0:41:39.680
<v Speaker 2>guy making this kind of outrageous nonsense digression that in

0:41:39.760 --> 0:41:44.320
<v Speaker 2>some way lands it in the sense of everybody wins

0:41:44.360 --> 0:41:48.080
<v Speaker 2>in the joke. Yeah, it's like the isolationists win because

0:41:48.080 --> 0:41:51.040
<v Speaker 2>they're like, we also don't want to be in foreign wars.

0:41:51.520 --> 0:41:54.560
<v Speaker 2>The people in the Middle East win because that's what

0:41:54.760 --> 0:41:57.640
<v Speaker 2>they there, that's what they want. Also they want us

0:41:57.719 --> 0:41:59.759
<v Speaker 2>not to be there, they want etc. And then his

0:42:00.080 --> 0:42:05.960
<v Speaker 2>example is minute and it's specific, and it's surprising. Yeah,

0:42:06.080 --> 0:42:07.839
<v Speaker 2>first of all, you don't think he's gonna talk about

0:42:07.840 --> 0:42:10.480
<v Speaker 2>women's point of view ever, Yeah, I mean, it's just

0:42:10.480 --> 0:42:13.520
<v Speaker 2>someone who doesn't care about women clearly. So then he

0:42:13.560 --> 0:42:18.840
<v Speaker 2>does in a surprise turn and it's confirmation biased on

0:42:18.880 --> 0:42:20.040
<v Speaker 2>what the audience already wanted to hear.

0:42:20.120 --> 0:42:23.279
<v Speaker 1>Right, So that's really insightful. You're saying, essentially, this joke

0:42:23.440 --> 0:42:25.440
<v Speaker 1>confirms the view of the world that I would like

0:42:25.520 --> 0:42:27.839
<v Speaker 1>to see, Like you're like, the.

0:42:27.800 --> 0:42:30.839
<v Speaker 2>People posting that I'm sure are isolation is yeah, and

0:42:30.880 --> 0:42:32.399
<v Speaker 2>the people in the audience are too.

0:42:32.880 --> 0:42:35.239
<v Speaker 1>Really fascinating. Well, thank you so much for doing yeas

0:42:35.280 --> 0:42:36.080
<v Speaker 1>been illuminating.

0:42:36.560 --> 0:42:37.000
<v Speaker 5>Thanks.

0:42:37.560 --> 0:42:40.319
<v Speaker 2>I'm glad it's great talking about it because it's not

0:42:40.320 --> 0:42:40.719
<v Speaker 2>what I do.

0:42:40.960 --> 0:42:53.799
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, all right, that was my conversation with Mike. Mister

0:42:53.840 --> 0:42:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Mike Berbiglia. Gotta say, very nice guy. The most interesting

0:42:57.800 --> 0:43:00.799
<v Speaker 1>thing I got from this interview is something that the

0:43:01.080 --> 0:43:03.440
<v Speaker 1>historian told us, which is that a lot of the

0:43:03.480 --> 0:43:06.359
<v Speaker 1>things we find funny are actually just kind of confirming

0:43:06.960 --> 0:43:10.359
<v Speaker 1>what we already believe in politics. Yeah, and so when

0:43:10.400 --> 0:43:12.680
<v Speaker 1>he was saying that a lot of people like that

0:43:12.760 --> 0:43:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Trump joke about the Burkas because we actually don't want

0:43:18.080 --> 0:43:20.879
<v Speaker 1>to be involved in all these wars. Yeah, I don't

0:43:20.880 --> 0:43:23.720
<v Speaker 1>know that really resonated. I didn't realize that was why.

0:43:23.960 --> 0:43:26.279
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I was like, it's kind of right, right where

0:43:26.280 --> 0:43:29.120
<v Speaker 7>it's like lead people alone, let them do their own thing. Right,

0:43:29.200 --> 0:43:31.080
<v Speaker 7>if Trump was saying the opposite of that and that clip,

0:43:31.080 --> 0:43:32.680
<v Speaker 7>we wouldn't find it as funny exactly.

0:43:32.800 --> 0:43:36.759
<v Speaker 1>And like both both at the time MAGA people and

0:43:37.080 --> 0:43:40.080
<v Speaker 1>people on the left were kind of the no more

0:43:40.480 --> 0:43:43.120
<v Speaker 1>foreign Wars stuff. Yes, that hasn't panned out for the

0:43:43.120 --> 0:43:45.719
<v Speaker 1>MAGA people, but still funny to me.

0:43:46.120 --> 0:43:49.160
<v Speaker 7>What's funny to me about that clip, and he mentioned

0:43:49.160 --> 0:43:51.719
<v Speaker 7>it earlier in your interview with him, is like, so

0:43:51.800 --> 0:43:54.920
<v Speaker 7>much of what's funny about Trump is his delivery, and

0:43:55.000 --> 0:43:58.400
<v Speaker 7>that delivery is like very Larry David esque, you know,

0:43:58.960 --> 0:44:01.440
<v Speaker 7>the way he like talked because like no, no, no, no,

0:44:01.680 --> 0:44:04.200
<v Speaker 7>like live alone, like honey, let's go. I was like

0:44:04.280 --> 0:44:06.640
<v Speaker 7>I could see this being like, you know, something similar

0:44:06.760 --> 0:44:08.279
<v Speaker 7>kind of did happen in curb But I was like,

0:44:08.520 --> 0:44:10.640
<v Speaker 7>Larry could do this same bit in Curve.

0:44:10.800 --> 0:44:15.399
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's more like than it is like set up punchline, yes,

0:44:15.520 --> 0:44:16.080
<v Speaker 1>I guess.

0:44:15.880 --> 0:44:18.080
<v Speaker 7>Yes, yeah, yeah. He has that sort of just sort

0:44:18.080 --> 0:44:20.840
<v Speaker 7>of like stream of consciousness sort of thing. And that

0:44:21.040 --> 0:44:23.960
<v Speaker 7>was when you know, we've reached another level of Trump

0:44:24.040 --> 0:44:26.160
<v Speaker 7>stream of consciousness where it never really comes back to

0:44:26.200 --> 0:44:29.160
<v Speaker 7>the beginning of the weave as But that was when

0:44:29.160 --> 0:44:31.200
<v Speaker 7>you could still kind of follow what was Yeah, yeah,

0:44:31.200 --> 0:44:32.319
<v Speaker 7>it was start to a.

0:44:32.520 --> 0:44:35.000
<v Speaker 11>Nice level where you know, we still got somewhere. Yeah,

0:44:35.000 --> 0:44:36.480
<v Speaker 11>there was a destination exactly.

0:44:36.719 --> 0:44:36.919
<v Speaker 10>Yeah.

0:44:36.960 --> 0:44:39.920
<v Speaker 11>What's what's notable is that it does sound comfortable and

0:44:40.000 --> 0:44:43.359
<v Speaker 11>like it's actually natural and not yes, versus other ones

0:44:43.360 --> 0:44:45.480
<v Speaker 11>where it feels like a pre written thing and it's

0:44:45.520 --> 0:44:47.799
<v Speaker 11>just like, Okay, now, now's the time when I bring

0:44:47.880 --> 0:44:49.600
<v Speaker 11>out my joke and everyone's gonna love it, you know.

0:44:49.840 --> 0:44:50.080
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:44:50.400 --> 0:44:52.480
<v Speaker 11>You know, to his credit, that's something Trump's able to

0:44:52.480 --> 0:44:55.759
<v Speaker 11>do is sound like he's just talking yeah, extemporary, it

0:44:55.760 --> 0:44:57.040
<v Speaker 11>feels genuine offense.

0:44:57.120 --> 0:45:00.880
<v Speaker 7>Might still thinking about the Mountain Dude thing, right.

0:45:01.000 --> 0:45:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Polar polar opposite of what we're just talking about now

0:45:03.719 --> 0:45:05.640
<v Speaker 1>is JD vance. He's like trying to force.

0:45:06.120 --> 0:45:07.800
<v Speaker 7>Now, what're spread about it is that like it sounds

0:45:07.800 --> 0:45:09.680
<v Speaker 7>like that's a joke he thought about ahead of time.

0:45:09.960 --> 0:45:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you know, oh it was totally test like someone

0:45:13.040 --> 0:45:14.439
<v Speaker 1>wrote on his team.

0:45:15.400 --> 0:45:17.680
<v Speaker 7>It wasn't like he was just like you know you

0:45:18.160 --> 0:45:19.640
<v Speaker 7>It's like it's like he felt like that was the

0:45:19.640 --> 0:45:20.840
<v Speaker 7>second or third time he told that.

0:45:20.960 --> 0:45:21.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah exactly.

0:45:21.800 --> 0:45:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, like I said in that in that conversation, you know,

0:45:25.040 --> 0:45:27.880
<v Speaker 1>the most glaring part is that the crowd wants you

0:45:27.960 --> 0:45:31.040
<v Speaker 1>to be successful here. The fact that they didn't have

0:45:31.200 --> 0:45:32.560
<v Speaker 1>any kind of a react.

0:45:32.320 --> 0:45:35.560
<v Speaker 7>Well, you can see everyone started being like wait, yeah, we.

0:45:35.800 --> 0:45:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Had to think. They're like, wait, what does that mountain do?

0:45:38.719 --> 0:45:41.040
<v Speaker 7>They're like saying it in their head, mountain do diet mountain?

0:45:41.200 --> 0:45:42.680
<v Speaker 7>Does it sound like something racist?

0:45:42.880 --> 0:45:43.800
<v Speaker 11>Yeah?

0:45:44.080 --> 0:45:48.000
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:45:44.880 --> 0:45:52.040
<v Speaker 1>No such thing as a production of Kaleidoscope Content. Our

0:45:52.120 --> 0:45:56.279
<v Speaker 1>executive producers are Kate Osborne and mangesh Hot Tokador. The

0:45:56.320 --> 0:45:59.879
<v Speaker 1>show was created by Many Fidel, Noah Friedman and Devin Joe.

0:46:00.480 --> 0:46:03.640
<v Speaker 1>The theme and credit song is by me Manny and

0:46:03.760 --> 0:46:06.799
<v Speaker 1>the mixing is done by Steve Bone. Special things to

0:46:06.960 --> 0:46:10.640
<v Speaker 1>our guests doctor Mark Rolf from the University of New

0:46:10.719 --> 0:46:15.000
<v Speaker 1>South Wales and Mike Birbiglia. Definitely check out his show

0:46:15.120 --> 0:46:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Mike Birbigley as working an out everywhere you listen to podcasts.

0:46:19.480 --> 0:46:22.160
<v Speaker 1>Be sure to check out our substack at No Such

0:46:22.239 --> 0:46:25.279
<v Speaker 1>Thing dot Show and leave us five stars if you

0:46:25.560 --> 0:46:28.080
<v Speaker 1>like what you've heard, See you next time.

0:46:29.880 --> 0:46:32.480
<v Speaker 7>He's He's He's A Hell's A.

0:46:32.920 --> 0:46:34.640
<v Speaker 8>No such Things