WEBVTT - Ceasefire Claims Diverge as Hormuz Stays Blocked

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. This is the Bloomberg

0:00:13.840 --> 0:00:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Surveillance Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at seven am Eastern

0:00:18.200 --> 0:00:22.000
<v Speaker 1>on Apple CarPlay or Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App.

0:00:22.360 --> 0:00:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts, or watch

0:00:25.760 --> 0:00:27.040
<v Speaker 1>us live on YouTube.

0:00:28.080 --> 0:00:30.240
<v Speaker 2>Sebastian Page has been writing up a storm.

0:00:30.840 --> 0:00:35.280
<v Speaker 3>He wrote a book about the Baltimore Orioles psychology of leadership. Oh,

0:00:35.360 --> 0:00:38.440
<v Speaker 3>it's working out Oriols starting strong, five hundred ball.

0:00:38.479 --> 0:00:40.360
<v Speaker 2>I believe there. He's a t rowe price.

0:00:40.360 --> 0:00:43.400
<v Speaker 3>We're thrilled at Sebastian Page could get us started, and

0:00:43.680 --> 0:00:46.960
<v Speaker 3>he's spent much on my mind the last two or

0:00:46.960 --> 0:00:51.239
<v Speaker 3>three days because everyone's talking about diversification and what it

0:00:51.320 --> 0:00:55.400
<v Speaker 3>means and rebalancing, and that his book is definitive.

0:00:55.440 --> 0:00:56.520
<v Speaker 2>It is beyond.

0:00:56.160 --> 0:00:59.880
<v Speaker 3>Diversification whatever investor needs to know when there's a war.

0:01:00.200 --> 0:01:03.040
<v Speaker 3>And we're thrilled Sebastian Page could join us this morning.

0:01:03.280 --> 0:01:07.039
<v Speaker 3>I got so many pundent Sebastian going back and forth

0:01:07.120 --> 0:01:11.240
<v Speaker 3>on stocks, bond's correlation. Cliff Astness had a beautiful tweet

0:01:11.240 --> 0:01:14.520
<v Speaker 3>out going what is this hot air? What should we

0:01:14.680 --> 0:01:18.520
<v Speaker 3>do with diversification given this war?

0:01:21.080 --> 0:01:26.920
<v Speaker 4>Tom the stockbond correlation is super hard to understand and predict,

0:01:27.560 --> 0:01:33.600
<v Speaker 4>but financial advisors everywhere just use a negative return correlation assumption,

0:01:34.080 --> 0:01:37.839
<v Speaker 4>and to me, that's wrong. The twelve month correlation historically

0:01:37.880 --> 0:01:42.399
<v Speaker 4>between stocks and bonds has flipped time has flipped signs

0:01:42.480 --> 0:01:45.840
<v Speaker 4>twenty nine times over the last eighty years from positive

0:01:45.880 --> 0:01:50.800
<v Speaker 4>to negative. It has ranged from minus eighty to plus eighty. Now,

0:01:50.840 --> 0:01:54.680
<v Speaker 4>the key to understanding the correlation is a simple question,

0:01:55.880 --> 0:01:59.880
<v Speaker 4>are we facing a growth shock or an inflation shock?

0:02:00.680 --> 0:02:03.560
<v Speaker 4>If you're flacing a little bit of both, it's complicated.

0:02:03.680 --> 0:02:09.440
<v Speaker 4>But if inflation volatility dominates, both stocks and bonds can

0:02:09.520 --> 0:02:12.280
<v Speaker 4>go down together. We learn this in twenty twenty two.

0:02:12.320 --> 0:02:13.959
<v Speaker 4>And by the way, if you're a nerd like me

0:02:14.040 --> 0:02:17.240
<v Speaker 4>and you studied correlations back to the seventies, same thing

0:02:17.280 --> 0:02:21.079
<v Speaker 4>that happened in the seventies. I do think looking out

0:02:21.120 --> 0:02:24.560
<v Speaker 4>six to twelve months, that inflation volatility is going to dominate.

0:02:25.080 --> 0:02:27.640
<v Speaker 4>So I'm arguing you should diverse fire hedges, not just

0:02:27.720 --> 0:02:28.280
<v Speaker 4>use treasure.

0:02:28.880 --> 0:02:33.280
<v Speaker 3>Clifastes alludes to the idea that we have equity products

0:02:33.360 --> 0:02:36.960
<v Speaker 3>and we have equity exposure, even though we're not calling

0:02:36.960 --> 0:02:41.080
<v Speaker 3>it equity all the alternative and derivative products out there today.

0:02:41.280 --> 0:02:44.040
<v Speaker 3>Paul's better at this, folks than I am. All those

0:02:44.120 --> 0:02:47.399
<v Speaker 3>private this private that are those equity equivalents.

0:02:49.919 --> 0:02:53.840
<v Speaker 4>Look, I think they are in a broad sense. We're

0:02:53.919 --> 0:02:58.000
<v Speaker 4>talking about businesses. You value them by discounting cash flows.

0:02:58.000 --> 0:03:01.280
<v Speaker 4>You use an interest rate to discount the cash flows. Tom,

0:03:01.280 --> 0:03:05.160
<v Speaker 4>it's CFA stuff, right, and then their discout rate should

0:03:05.160 --> 0:03:08.960
<v Speaker 4>be influenced by risk and liquidity and market conditions. But

0:03:09.360 --> 0:03:12.120
<v Speaker 4>you know, Cliff Astness likes to be controversial, and he

0:03:12.200 --> 0:03:16.080
<v Speaker 4>calls it volatility laundering, I think is the term he uses.

0:03:16.160 --> 0:03:19.200
<v Speaker 4>But we don't mark to market the private assets. Look,

0:03:19.280 --> 0:03:23.360
<v Speaker 4>private assets can be wonderful additions to investors' portfolios. In

0:03:23.440 --> 0:03:26.840
<v Speaker 4>my own personal portfolio, I own private assets.

0:03:26.840 --> 0:03:32.239
<v Speaker 3>But that's continue you know, that's his private ass.

0:03:32.040 --> 0:03:35.440
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, but you know those are financial assets. And if

0:03:35.480 --> 0:03:37.560
<v Speaker 4>you're kind of a mark to market person, I think

0:03:37.560 --> 0:03:41.800
<v Speaker 4>it's better to build risk models around an assumption and

0:03:41.960 --> 0:03:46.040
<v Speaker 4>adjustments where you can, you know, synthetically mark to market

0:03:46.080 --> 0:03:49.600
<v Speaker 4>those investments and do it more thoughtful portfolio construction. Well,

0:03:50.280 --> 0:03:53.080
<v Speaker 4>these are great assets generally, they're just not free lunches.

0:03:53.720 --> 0:03:56.400
<v Speaker 5>So Sebastian, what do we doing in the bond market here,

0:03:56.880 --> 0:03:58.840
<v Speaker 5>how much credit risks should you be taking in a

0:03:58.880 --> 0:04:01.840
<v Speaker 5>world that has black Swan events, has a lot of

0:04:01.880 --> 0:04:05.240
<v Speaker 5>cross currents, has a lot of geopolitical risk here, how

0:04:05.280 --> 0:04:05.920
<v Speaker 5>about credit?

0:04:08.280 --> 0:04:13.680
<v Speaker 4>We're slightly long credit. And yesterday was interesting because the

0:04:13.760 --> 0:04:17.360
<v Speaker 4>relief rally was clearly risk on. You saw high yield

0:04:17.440 --> 0:04:22.520
<v Speaker 4>spreads titan again to Tom's point, the Vicks went down,

0:04:22.880 --> 0:04:27.040
<v Speaker 4>you had five percent pops and stock prices also, it

0:04:27.080 --> 0:04:31.200
<v Speaker 4>was favorable to the broadening. You know, European stocks did well,

0:04:31.279 --> 0:04:35.640
<v Speaker 4>Emerging market stocks, small caps, they all are performed. But

0:04:36.040 --> 0:04:40.160
<v Speaker 4>I think we also need to accept that there's remaining

0:04:40.160 --> 0:04:45.080
<v Speaker 4>inflation pressures. Damage has been done and all prices yesterday

0:04:45.120 --> 0:04:48.040
<v Speaker 4>they went down twenty percent, but they stabilized fifty percent

0:04:48.080 --> 0:04:51.120
<v Speaker 4>higher than they were twelve months ago. So we don't

0:04:51.120 --> 0:04:54.760
<v Speaker 4>expect a recession. The underlying forces in the economy are

0:04:54.800 --> 0:04:59.479
<v Speaker 4>actually pretty good, because you know, the Bloomberg's economic surprise

0:04:59.560 --> 0:05:02.320
<v Speaker 4>and dext is at its highest in two and a

0:05:02.360 --> 0:05:05.960
<v Speaker 4>half years. And someone just showed me data that the

0:05:06.000 --> 0:05:09.240
<v Speaker 4>tax refunds are running fourteen percent higher than last year.

0:05:09.720 --> 0:05:13.760
<v Speaker 4>So quietly, in the background of all these headlines, the

0:05:13.880 --> 0:05:18.600
<v Speaker 4>economy's humming if not accelerating, so we don't expect a recession.

0:05:18.720 --> 0:05:21.560
<v Speaker 4>We're short duration because we're worried about inflation risk, but

0:05:21.600 --> 0:05:22.720
<v Speaker 4>we're slightly long credit.

0:05:23.640 --> 0:05:25.960
<v Speaker 5>What do you expect, Sebastian, This fed a reserve to do.

0:05:26.000 --> 0:05:27.760
<v Speaker 5>It looks if I'm just looking at the worp function

0:05:27.800 --> 0:05:30.400
<v Speaker 5>on the Bloomberg terminal, I got nothing. I mean, the

0:05:30.440 --> 0:05:32.840
<v Speaker 5>market's not looking for cuts, not looking for hikes. It

0:05:32.920 --> 0:05:34.520
<v Speaker 5>looks like they're just going to sit on their hands here.

0:05:36.880 --> 0:05:39.159
<v Speaker 4>I think nothing is the base case. But if you

0:05:39.240 --> 0:05:42.680
<v Speaker 4>ask me, where's the skew to use a technical term, right,

0:05:42.880 --> 0:05:45.880
<v Speaker 4>can you get is the probability of an upside surprise

0:05:45.960 --> 0:05:49.400
<v Speaker 4>and inflation greater than the probability of a downside surprise?

0:05:49.920 --> 0:05:51.760
<v Speaker 4>I'll give you a resounding yes.

0:05:52.440 --> 0:05:52.680
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:05:53.240 --> 0:05:56.040
<v Speaker 4>Just look at where oil prices is stabilizing on a

0:05:56.160 --> 0:05:59.440
<v Speaker 4>day like yesterday, when we think we think this trait

0:05:59.560 --> 0:06:02.320
<v Speaker 4>is going to reopen, it's nowhere near where it was.

0:06:02.880 --> 0:06:05.359
<v Speaker 4>And go ahead, Tom, well, I got it.

0:06:05.400 --> 0:06:05.960
<v Speaker 2>We gotta go.

0:06:06.080 --> 0:06:08.760
<v Speaker 3>Keith Lender is here going win a man? Sebastian, As

0:06:08.760 --> 0:06:11.000
<v Speaker 3>simple as I can. If you attended the Oriols yet,

0:06:11.240 --> 0:06:13.760
<v Speaker 3>if you sat in the Tiro price box.

0:06:13.839 --> 0:06:16.599
<v Speaker 2>It's in the dugout. And have you seen Alonso play

0:06:16.640 --> 0:06:17.599
<v Speaker 2>yet for the Orioles.

0:06:19.760 --> 0:06:22.279
<v Speaker 4>I haven't. I can't wait to go. You know, players

0:06:22.360 --> 0:06:25.200
<v Speaker 4>are wearing a Tiro Price patch. We have Tier Price

0:06:25.320 --> 0:06:29.120
<v Speaker 4>signage at the stadium. It's a wonderful partnership between the

0:06:29.160 --> 0:06:32.760
<v Speaker 4>Orioles and Tiro Price where we have our global headquarters.

0:06:32.800 --> 0:06:35.280
<v Speaker 4>So and tom My dream is to watch a game

0:06:35.279 --> 0:06:36.039
<v Speaker 4>with you one day.

0:06:36.440 --> 0:06:37.320
<v Speaker 2>Well, we'd like to do that.

0:06:37.360 --> 0:06:39.400
<v Speaker 3>I'd love to see the I saw the Canadians the

0:06:39.440 --> 0:06:42.719
<v Speaker 3>other day in New Jersey, Sebastian. I would kill to

0:06:42.760 --> 0:06:46.560
<v Speaker 3>see les Abiitan with Sebastian Page always of Quebec.

0:06:46.600 --> 0:06:47.840
<v Speaker 2>Sebastian, thank you so much.

0:06:47.960 --> 0:06:51.400
<v Speaker 3>His book, The Psychology Leadership is out now, folks getting

0:06:51.400 --> 0:06:54.000
<v Speaker 3>a heavy read by corporate leaders.

0:06:55.760 --> 0:06:56.479
<v Speaker 2>Stay with us.

0:06:56.720 --> 0:06:59.880
<v Speaker 3>More from Bloomberg Surveillance coming up after this.

0:07:07.200 --> 0:07:10.800
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Catch us live

0:07:10.840 --> 0:07:14.000
<v Speaker 1>weekday afternoons from seven to ten am Eastern Listen on

0:07:14.120 --> 0:07:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Apple Karplay and Android Otto with the Bloomberg Business app,

0:07:17.680 --> 0:07:19.520
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:07:20.040 --> 0:07:23.080
<v Speaker 3>The incredible and recent work of Jennifer Welch, chief JE

0:07:23.240 --> 0:07:27.800
<v Speaker 3>Economics Analysts for Bloomberg Economics. Jennifer, I'm honored to have

0:07:27.880 --> 0:07:31.440
<v Speaker 3>you on one of the most painful books of my life.

0:07:31.440 --> 0:07:34.520
<v Speaker 3>And this goes to your East Asian studies in Beijing

0:07:34.600 --> 0:07:38.720
<v Speaker 3>with Bucknell, and it was Daniel kurtz Phalen's one volume

0:07:38.800 --> 0:07:43.720
<v Speaker 3>on Marshall in nineteen forty six. There was a ceasefire

0:07:44.400 --> 0:07:48.200
<v Speaker 3>and it didn't work out well in China in nineteen

0:07:48.320 --> 0:07:52.760
<v Speaker 3>forty six. I know you studied that your thoughts on

0:07:52.840 --> 0:07:56.080
<v Speaker 3>a ceasefire in twenty twenty six.

0:07:57.640 --> 0:08:00.280
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, So the ceasar at the moment is looking rather

0:08:00.360 --> 0:08:04.360
<v Speaker 6>fragile and rather ambiguous. It's unclear what terms it contains.

0:08:04.400 --> 0:08:07.040
<v Speaker 6>It's unclear whether it is fully in place at the moment.

0:08:07.480 --> 0:08:10.680
<v Speaker 6>The strait of her moves seems still be subject to

0:08:10.760 --> 0:08:15.080
<v Speaker 6>Iranian control, and there's ongoing fighting in Lebanon, which Iron

0:08:15.120 --> 0:08:18.760
<v Speaker 6>says is a violation of the ceasefire. Now that being said,

0:08:18.800 --> 0:08:21.840
<v Speaker 6>it does seem negotiations are still moving forward this weekend,

0:08:21.920 --> 0:08:24.800
<v Speaker 6>led by US Vice President Jad Vans and Iran Speaker

0:08:24.840 --> 0:08:28.280
<v Speaker 6>of the Parliament, but there's very narrow space for a

0:08:28.320 --> 0:08:30.640
<v Speaker 6>deal that lasts beyond the two week pause.

0:08:30.920 --> 0:08:34.640
<v Speaker 3>Am I control, As I said to Paul earlier, where

0:08:34.679 --> 0:08:40.199
<v Speaker 3>in Lord's name is the Secretary of State doing shuttle diplomacy.

0:08:41.000 --> 0:08:43.560
<v Speaker 6>It is a excellent question, and I think it's not

0:08:44.000 --> 0:08:47.280
<v Speaker 6>entirely coincidental that Secuary of State Mark or Rubio, who

0:08:47.360 --> 0:08:50.000
<v Speaker 6>is also the National Security Advisor, hasn't seemed to be

0:08:50.160 --> 0:08:53.600
<v Speaker 6>as directly involved in this conflict as he has, for example,

0:08:53.720 --> 0:08:58.000
<v Speaker 6>in US operations in Venezuela and US policy on Cuba.

0:08:58.160 --> 0:09:00.280
<v Speaker 7>It seems that he is focusing.

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:04.160
<v Speaker 6>Largely on Latin America, and President Trump has asked JD.

0:09:04.320 --> 0:09:06.840
<v Speaker 7>Vans to take the helmet negotiations here.

0:09:07.120 --> 0:09:10.080
<v Speaker 6>Now, that might be attempting to play to a domestic

0:09:10.120 --> 0:09:11.600
<v Speaker 6>political audience, with JD.

0:09:11.720 --> 0:09:13.160
<v Speaker 7>Vans being a known.

0:09:13.320 --> 0:09:17.000
<v Speaker 6>Sort of skeptic of US foreign policy arrangements and sort

0:09:17.000 --> 0:09:20.400
<v Speaker 6>of a way of signaling to Trump's base, don't worry,

0:09:20.520 --> 0:09:23.800
<v Speaker 6>We're sending sort of our most skeptical person out there

0:09:23.840 --> 0:09:27.800
<v Speaker 6>to make sure that we extract ourselves from this conflict

0:09:27.800 --> 0:09:28.520
<v Speaker 6>that we launched.

0:09:29.000 --> 0:09:33.400
<v Speaker 5>So what are the choices realistically for the US and

0:09:33.440 --> 0:09:35.920
<v Speaker 5>for President Trump here as negotiations begin.

0:09:37.480 --> 0:09:40.920
<v Speaker 6>So, frankly, President Trump doesn't have a huge number of

0:09:40.920 --> 0:09:44.400
<v Speaker 6>options at his disposal right If Aron is seen as

0:09:44.480 --> 0:09:47.280
<v Speaker 6>still not making good on its promise to reopen the

0:09:47.280 --> 0:09:49.560
<v Speaker 6>straight of per Moves, which Trump said was critical to

0:09:49.600 --> 0:09:50.360
<v Speaker 6>the ceasefire.

0:09:50.920 --> 0:09:52.440
<v Speaker 7>He really has two choices.

0:09:52.480 --> 0:09:56.120
<v Speaker 6>He can either threaten as he has to use military

0:09:56.160 --> 0:09:59.440
<v Speaker 6>force against them, saying that the ceasefire is now Nolan void.

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:02.120
<v Speaker 7>I think the bar for that is rather high. This

0:10:02.200 --> 0:10:05.200
<v Speaker 7>is an unpopular war in the United States. Gas prices

0:10:05.240 --> 0:10:09.120
<v Speaker 7>are still rather high. He's clearly looking for an exit ramp.

0:10:09.200 --> 0:10:12.079
<v Speaker 6>So that leads to the second option, which is diplomacy,

0:10:12.160 --> 0:10:15.000
<v Speaker 6>and I think that's why we are seeing talks happening

0:10:15.040 --> 0:10:19.200
<v Speaker 6>this weekend and there It's also difficult to say because

0:10:19.240 --> 0:10:21.520
<v Speaker 6>the White House is saying that the ten terms around

0:10:21.559 --> 0:10:24.280
<v Speaker 6>has put out publicly are not the terms are negotiating over.

0:10:24.640 --> 0:10:26.760
<v Speaker 6>But even if we look at those ten terms, we

0:10:26.800 --> 0:10:29.439
<v Speaker 6>think that there is the potential for a landing space

0:10:29.480 --> 0:10:32.360
<v Speaker 6>for a deal. There are probably some areas Iran's willing

0:10:32.400 --> 0:10:34.880
<v Speaker 6>to compromise on, areas the United States is willing to

0:10:34.920 --> 0:10:38.320
<v Speaker 6>compromise on. I think the key sticking point is going

0:10:38.360 --> 0:10:41.720
<v Speaker 6>to be how much Washington takes into account Israel's perspective,

0:10:42.320 --> 0:10:44.880
<v Speaker 6>which is probably far less willing to accept some of

0:10:44.920 --> 0:10:46.559
<v Speaker 6>the terms that Iran.

0:10:46.280 --> 0:10:48.280
<v Speaker 7>Has put on the table, at least publicly.

0:10:49.040 --> 0:10:54.920
<v Speaker 3>Jennifer Wells, chief geoeconomics analysts for Bloomberg and Economics. Jennifer

0:10:55.280 --> 0:10:58.040
<v Speaker 3>on the economics of the moment, it is the cost

0:10:58.200 --> 0:11:02.079
<v Speaker 3>of the war or do we just print bill notes

0:11:02.120 --> 0:11:04.720
<v Speaker 3>and bonds and we don't care about the cost of

0:11:04.800 --> 0:11:05.160
<v Speaker 3>the war?

0:11:06.520 --> 0:11:08.400
<v Speaker 6>Well, I think there are two dimensions to the cost

0:11:08.400 --> 0:11:11.000
<v Speaker 6>of the war for the United States. There's the military dimension,

0:11:11.160 --> 0:11:15.000
<v Speaker 6>the cost of operations and in the Middle East, and

0:11:15.360 --> 0:11:19.040
<v Speaker 6>clearly that's something that is high and probably rising further.

0:11:19.200 --> 0:11:22.400
<v Speaker 6>The longer that these assets are deployed away from their

0:11:22.400 --> 0:11:25.000
<v Speaker 6>home stations, the more maintenance they will need.

0:11:25.120 --> 0:11:25.880
<v Speaker 7>After the fact.

0:11:25.920 --> 0:11:28.920
<v Speaker 6>The more that we are deploying, in particular more personnel

0:11:29.160 --> 0:11:32.640
<v Speaker 6>who the region, the higher those payroll costs are going

0:11:32.720 --> 0:11:35.200
<v Speaker 6>to be. And then there's the second dimension, which is

0:11:35.240 --> 0:11:37.560
<v Speaker 6>probably the one that President Trump is more sensitive to,

0:11:37.840 --> 0:11:41.600
<v Speaker 6>and that's the oil price dimension and how that affects

0:11:41.600 --> 0:11:43.800
<v Speaker 6>prices back at the pump here in the United States.

0:11:44.120 --> 0:11:48.120
<v Speaker 6>That's obviously something that's incredibly domestically politically sensitive and salient,

0:11:48.600 --> 0:11:52.040
<v Speaker 6>and that's probably the trigger that he is most closely

0:11:52.080 --> 0:11:55.600
<v Speaker 6>paying attention to, along with the resulting impact on markets.

0:11:56.280 --> 0:11:59.160
<v Speaker 5>Jennifer real quick here the Straight of HORNUS. I guess

0:11:59.200 --> 0:12:01.679
<v Speaker 5>we're all getting small on this. How important it is.

0:12:01.800 --> 0:12:05.160
<v Speaker 5>Before this war, it was effectively open to all international traffic.

0:12:05.520 --> 0:12:08.240
<v Speaker 5>Now it's not. How was that an improvement for the US.

0:12:09.400 --> 0:12:12.040
<v Speaker 6>That's a great question, and I think there's still many

0:12:12.160 --> 0:12:15.240
<v Speaker 6>questions looming about what the ultimate path forward for her

0:12:15.280 --> 0:12:17.600
<v Speaker 6>Moves is. Iran is saying that it wants to charge

0:12:17.600 --> 0:12:20.760
<v Speaker 6>a toll, that it wants any vessels transitting through to

0:12:20.880 --> 0:12:25.360
<v Speaker 6>do so in coordination with its military, and as several

0:12:25.440 --> 0:12:28.040
<v Speaker 6>leaders in the region have pointed it out, that's not

0:12:28.240 --> 0:12:32.120
<v Speaker 6>a free and open her Moves. That is still controlled passage,

0:12:32.280 --> 0:12:34.360
<v Speaker 6>and so I think that is going to have a

0:12:34.400 --> 0:12:37.760
<v Speaker 6>real constraining effect on how much traffic can go back

0:12:37.800 --> 0:12:41.199
<v Speaker 6>to the Strait now. Obviously, I think negotiators this weekend

0:12:41.240 --> 0:12:42.720
<v Speaker 6>are going to be trying to hammer this out. The

0:12:42.800 --> 0:12:45.240
<v Speaker 6>US is going to be pushing for truly reopening it.

0:12:45.520 --> 0:12:47.480
<v Speaker 6>But at the same time President Trump has turned out

0:12:47.480 --> 0:12:50.240
<v Speaker 6>this idea of a joint toll, So a lot of

0:12:50.320 --> 0:12:51.520
<v Speaker 6>questions still remaining.

0:12:51.840 --> 0:12:54.840
<v Speaker 3>Jennifer, thank you so much. Jennifer Welch Bloomberg Economics today

0:12:54.960 --> 0:13:00.480
<v Speaker 3>just brilliant. Stay with us more from Bloomberg Surveillance coming

0:13:00.559 --> 0:13:01.560
<v Speaker 3>up after this.

0:13:08.800 --> 0:13:12.400
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Catch us live

0:13:12.440 --> 0:13:15.640
<v Speaker 1>weekday afternoons from seven to ten am Eastern Listen on

0:13:15.679 --> 0:13:19.079
<v Speaker 1>Apple Karplay and Android Otto with the Bloomberg Business app,

0:13:19.280 --> 0:13:21.840
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube Android.

0:13:21.840 --> 0:13:26.640
<v Speaker 3>Perrald joins us down at HI Vista Strategies with all

0:13:26.679 --> 0:13:29.960
<v Speaker 3>of his work as well at HBS in Boston. And

0:13:30.000 --> 0:13:33.680
<v Speaker 3>I mean the parchment, folks, is important, the George Gunn,

0:13:33.679 --> 0:13:38.800
<v Speaker 3>Professor of Finance and Banking Emeritus at HBS. It carries

0:13:38.840 --> 0:13:42.480
<v Speaker 3>a lot of way to it. Is the stereotype of

0:13:42.800 --> 0:13:45.320
<v Speaker 3>HBS the same as it was thirty years ago?

0:13:45.440 --> 0:13:47.760
<v Speaker 2>Is it still case study? Rigor?

0:13:49.559 --> 0:13:53.319
<v Speaker 8>It's a good stereotype, Okase, study grounded in the real world,

0:13:53.440 --> 0:13:57.920
<v Speaker 8>having serious conversations with very smart people did nothing.

0:13:58.120 --> 0:13:58.960
<v Speaker 9>Nothing can beat that.

0:13:59.320 --> 0:14:01.280
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I think of the number I thank you

0:14:01.360 --> 0:14:03.760
<v Speaker 3>so much down the road at MIT, Simon Johnson and

0:14:03.760 --> 0:14:07.520
<v Speaker 3>Gary Gensler mentioning me and Paul in their latest podcast

0:14:08.200 --> 0:14:11.400
<v Speaker 3>Down the River. At MIT and at Harvard, we're all

0:14:11.440 --> 0:14:15.200
<v Speaker 3>dealing with AI. I assume there isn't a case study

0:14:15.280 --> 0:14:16.440
<v Speaker 3>yet at AI.

0:14:16.800 --> 0:14:17.840
<v Speaker 2>What's it going to look like?

0:14:17.960 --> 0:14:20.720
<v Speaker 8>In five years now they're no okay, studies on AID

0:14:20.760 --> 0:14:25.400
<v Speaker 8>all now. It totally pervades the curriculum completely, and startups

0:14:25.400 --> 0:14:28.479
<v Speaker 8>and students trying to startups in the summer.

0:14:28.200 --> 0:14:30.360
<v Speaker 9>And in the second year. And AI is a very

0:14:30.360 --> 0:14:30.840
<v Speaker 9>big part.

0:14:31.040 --> 0:14:33.200
<v Speaker 3>So I got to get to it. Paul's got any questions.

0:14:33.400 --> 0:14:35.160
<v Speaker 3>I got to get to it as simple as I can.

0:14:35.360 --> 0:14:40.240
<v Speaker 3>Everybody listening, everybody watching across America, what is the parole

0:14:40.560 --> 0:14:45.120
<v Speaker 3>formula to embrace AI and keep going?

0:14:46.520 --> 0:14:47.840
<v Speaker 9>Start my being scared.

0:14:48.160 --> 0:14:51.280
<v Speaker 8>If you don't understand AI and use it yourself, you

0:14:51.400 --> 0:14:52.080
<v Speaker 8>will be out.

0:14:51.960 --> 0:14:56.280
<v Speaker 9>Of a job. So get with it. Learn it. Learn

0:14:56.320 --> 0:15:00.800
<v Speaker 9>to vibe code? What code? Vibe code? You you can.

0:15:01.000 --> 0:15:03.920
<v Speaker 8>Program yourself by talking to a program and it writes

0:15:04.000 --> 0:15:06.160
<v Speaker 8>code and any of us can do it. If you

0:15:06.160 --> 0:15:10.160
<v Speaker 8>can do Excel, you can do vibe coding. It's extraordinary,

0:15:10.520 --> 0:15:10.840
<v Speaker 8>all right.

0:15:10.920 --> 0:15:14.960
<v Speaker 5>So let's well the AI story before the war, it

0:15:15.000 --> 0:15:16.800
<v Speaker 5>was all AI for the last three four years in

0:15:16.840 --> 0:15:21.280
<v Speaker 5>this marketplace. Now we've got geopolitical risk, at least temporarily

0:15:21.280 --> 0:15:22.040
<v Speaker 5>on the front burner.

0:15:22.600 --> 0:15:23.640
<v Speaker 9>What's an investor to do?

0:15:23.880 --> 0:15:27.120
<v Speaker 5>How do you instruct perhaps some of your students, HBS,

0:15:27.600 --> 0:15:30.880
<v Speaker 5>there's a lot, it's arguably a more complicated world today

0:15:30.880 --> 0:15:33.040
<v Speaker 5>than it was ten twenty, thirty forty years. So you

0:15:33.080 --> 0:15:35.520
<v Speaker 5>could probably always say that, but how do you set

0:15:35.560 --> 0:15:37.920
<v Speaker 5>that up in terms of trying to build a portfolio here.

0:15:38.320 --> 0:15:43.720
<v Speaker 8>So, firstly, it's the most amazing world. It's crazy dynamic.

0:15:43.880 --> 0:15:48.080
<v Speaker 8>I call it a world of exponential change on many dimensions.

0:15:48.120 --> 0:15:52.120
<v Speaker 8>Think what's happening with AI AI on jobs, it's eviscerating jobs,

0:15:52.160 --> 0:15:56.320
<v Speaker 8>it's creating jobs. It's eviscerating firms. It's creating firms at

0:15:56.360 --> 0:16:02.240
<v Speaker 8>a pace we've never seen. War offense, Look at fiscal

0:16:02.280 --> 0:16:08.480
<v Speaker 8>deficits completely out of control, inflation. Look what's happening with energy,

0:16:10.280 --> 0:16:14.080
<v Speaker 8>you know, immigration, Just look around the world. It's scary,

0:16:14.200 --> 0:16:16.560
<v Speaker 8>but it's changing rapidly and it's very exciting.

0:16:16.600 --> 0:16:19.080
<v Speaker 9>So in a world like that where.

0:16:18.880 --> 0:16:21.760
<v Speaker 8>It's changing rapidly, the chances you can get an edge

0:16:21.800 --> 0:16:24.720
<v Speaker 8>if you're careful go way up. So if you're an investor,

0:16:25.360 --> 0:16:27.560
<v Speaker 8>if the world is static, it's very hard to get

0:16:27.560 --> 0:16:29.360
<v Speaker 8>an edge because everyone just catches up.

0:16:29.840 --> 0:16:31.760
<v Speaker 9>But in this world you can get an edge.

0:16:31.800 --> 0:16:35.760
<v Speaker 8>It's a fantastic place to be an active investor and

0:16:35.840 --> 0:16:38.360
<v Speaker 8>for a career. I say to young people you should

0:16:38.360 --> 0:16:40.200
<v Speaker 8>go to places where you can get an edge. Go

0:16:40.280 --> 0:16:43.440
<v Speaker 8>where there's exciting new things happening as opposed to a

0:16:43.480 --> 0:16:44.360
<v Speaker 8>staid old place.

0:16:44.760 --> 0:16:45.760
<v Speaker 9>So where is that today?

0:16:46.120 --> 0:16:49.120
<v Speaker 5>My coming through business school myself, it was Wall Street

0:16:49.120 --> 0:16:53.840
<v Speaker 5>and consulting. Now it seems so much broader technology as

0:16:53.920 --> 0:16:56.720
<v Speaker 5>taking some of the best and brightest. Where do you

0:16:56.720 --> 0:16:59.600
<v Speaker 5>see some opportunities? Is it all AI today?

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:03.240
<v Speaker 8>It's well, stuff is related. I'll give examples. So electricians

0:17:03.280 --> 0:17:06.360
<v Speaker 8>are in crazy demand. Okay, I don't know how many

0:17:06.440 --> 0:17:11.240
<v Speaker 8>Nbas want electrician jobs, but they it's a fantastic job today.

0:17:11.320 --> 0:17:14.560
<v Speaker 8>Data centers are consuming them and there's a huge shortage.

0:17:14.880 --> 0:17:19.600
<v Speaker 8>It's an example of a job category that is amazing for.

0:17:19.560 --> 0:17:21.800
<v Speaker 3>Global Wall Street Mark Champion coming up in a bit,

0:17:21.840 --> 0:17:24.480
<v Speaker 3>but we are honored to bring an under approval of

0:17:24.800 --> 0:17:31.159
<v Speaker 3>HBS CIO partner at High Vista Strategies as well. In HBS,

0:17:31.400 --> 0:17:35.960
<v Speaker 3>did they still teach modern capitalism the first year that

0:17:36.160 --> 0:17:38.320
<v Speaker 3>macroc course from ages ago?

0:17:38.960 --> 0:17:40.840
<v Speaker 9>They teach it in varying ways.

0:17:41.080 --> 0:17:45.119
<v Speaker 8>I would teach finance, and I think teaching finance is

0:17:45.119 --> 0:17:49.520
<v Speaker 8>the is the most fantastic way to teach capitalism. It's

0:17:49.560 --> 0:17:53.840
<v Speaker 8>about markets, right and what it does for the economy.

0:17:54.000 --> 0:17:56.000
<v Speaker 3>I mean you sound like v body over at the

0:17:56.000 --> 0:17:59.440
<v Speaker 3>other school there and coming with the avenue as well.

0:17:59.520 --> 0:18:02.960
<v Speaker 3>Then help me here with your thoughts on the ginormous

0:18:03.080 --> 0:18:06.679
<v Speaker 3>bond issuance. Are Robert Shifman saying we could see a

0:18:06.760 --> 0:18:10.119
<v Speaker 3>multi billion dollar tens of billion a dollar amount of

0:18:10.119 --> 0:18:13.199
<v Speaker 3>Facebook deal coming out of the transactions just in the

0:18:13.240 --> 0:18:18.520
<v Speaker 3>last six six hours. How do you perceive the megabond

0:18:18.520 --> 0:18:20.600
<v Speaker 3>deals and the demand for them.

0:18:21.119 --> 0:18:24.359
<v Speaker 8>So the bond issuance right now, they have great credit

0:18:24.440 --> 0:18:27.520
<v Speaker 8>rating so they can fund these data centers. Data centers

0:18:27.520 --> 0:18:31.120
<v Speaker 8>get funded by guarantees from these things, and that's related

0:18:31.119 --> 0:18:34.639
<v Speaker 8>to their bond issuance. But bond issuance at large in

0:18:34.680 --> 0:18:35.919
<v Speaker 8>the economy.

0:18:35.560 --> 0:18:36.520
<v Speaker 9>That is huge.

0:18:36.680 --> 0:18:41.880
<v Speaker 8>The federal deficit for one, so real rates are extraordinary.

0:18:42.000 --> 0:18:45.080
<v Speaker 8>You can buy thirty inflation bonds yielding two point seven

0:18:45.400 --> 0:18:47.480
<v Speaker 8>locked in for thirty years, so as long as the

0:18:47.520 --> 0:18:51.040
<v Speaker 8>government doesn't default, I'm getting two point seven plus inflation.

0:18:52.200 --> 0:18:56.040
<v Speaker 8>If we go to stagflation, those will rerate yields down,

0:18:56.600 --> 0:19:00.840
<v Speaker 8>prices up plus inflation protection. Why would you buy gold

0:19:01.280 --> 0:19:04.960
<v Speaker 8>if you worried about monetary debasement, buy inflation bonds. GDP

0:19:05.200 --> 0:19:08.200
<v Speaker 8>growth is like two two in a bit and I'm

0:19:08.200 --> 0:19:10.240
<v Speaker 8>getting two seven on inflation bonds.

0:19:10.480 --> 0:19:13.480
<v Speaker 5>It sounds like one of those young selling me some song,

0:19:13.720 --> 0:19:18.960
<v Speaker 5>you know, moving some bonds exactly. Professor inefficiencies in the market,

0:19:18.960 --> 0:19:22.720
<v Speaker 5>They're hard to find. However, one area to me in

0:19:22.760 --> 0:19:25.639
<v Speaker 5>the equity markets that seems incredibly inefficient. It's almost a

0:19:25.680 --> 0:19:31.960
<v Speaker 5>binary response. Is biotech. Either the thing works and you

0:19:32.000 --> 0:19:34.520
<v Speaker 5>double your money, or the test fails and it goes

0:19:34.560 --> 0:19:37.479
<v Speaker 5>to zero. How do you approach something like that with

0:19:37.520 --> 0:19:38.320
<v Speaker 5>that risk profile.

0:19:38.359 --> 0:19:41.320
<v Speaker 9>So we love biotech. It's a hedge fund investor.

0:19:41.440 --> 0:19:45.760
<v Speaker 8>That's a stockpicker's dream because the upside is huge, the

0:19:45.840 --> 0:19:48.080
<v Speaker 8>downside is huge. If you know what you're doing, you

0:19:48.119 --> 0:19:52.720
<v Speaker 8>can distinguish it's event rich. Every time there's a clinical

0:19:52.760 --> 0:19:55.840
<v Speaker 8>trial readout, it's an event. Every time there's a financing,

0:19:56.000 --> 0:19:59.120
<v Speaker 8>it's an event. So it's a hedge fundream. You've got events.

0:19:59.160 --> 0:20:03.280
<v Speaker 8>They shortened the time horizon on what's otherwise a long

0:20:03.359 --> 0:20:04.240
<v Speaker 8>dated investment.

0:20:04.560 --> 0:20:06.160
<v Speaker 2>Did biotech save Boston?

0:20:06.640 --> 0:20:09.920
<v Speaker 3>Basically it came along jen Zimon all that years ago,

0:20:09.960 --> 0:20:13.040
<v Speaker 3>and then it worked out from there and did essentially

0:20:13.359 --> 0:20:16.120
<v Speaker 3>the courage to do biotech and the ge thing in

0:20:16.119 --> 0:20:18.040
<v Speaker 3>Fidel do you know that it's saved.

0:20:17.760 --> 0:20:20.919
<v Speaker 8>Boston and now it's hurting Boston because biotech took a

0:20:20.920 --> 0:20:24.240
<v Speaker 8>big whack the last few years. Why because rates went

0:20:24.320 --> 0:20:28.000
<v Speaker 8>up the cost they consume capital. They never make money,

0:20:28.000 --> 0:20:30.080
<v Speaker 8>they get sold to farmer when they do make money,

0:20:30.119 --> 0:20:32.160
<v Speaker 8>so they always consuming capital.

0:20:32.280 --> 0:20:34.720
<v Speaker 9>Okay, rates go up, It really.

0:20:34.560 --> 0:20:37.600
<v Speaker 8>Hurt them and they shut down tons of labs who

0:20:37.600 --> 0:20:38.920
<v Speaker 8>were built and those have been show.

0:20:38.840 --> 0:20:41.600
<v Speaker 3>Is that the analog for AI where they're consuming tons

0:20:41.600 --> 0:20:42.920
<v Speaker 3>of capital and it's going to be.

0:20:42.880 --> 0:20:48.320
<v Speaker 8>Oops, it could absolutely be absolutely the capital consumption startups.

0:20:48.880 --> 0:20:52.680
<v Speaker 8>A startup today is in the billions of of value

0:20:52.760 --> 0:20:54.840
<v Speaker 8>consuming megacap.

0:20:54.400 --> 0:20:56.840
<v Speaker 5>X is at high vista strategies.

0:20:57.000 --> 0:20:58.920
<v Speaker 2>How do you guys play the AI story?

0:20:59.880 --> 0:21:05.240
<v Speaker 9>So AI is it's hard. We think of it as

0:21:05.240 --> 0:21:06.560
<v Speaker 9>shorten your time horizon.

0:21:07.400 --> 0:21:10.520
<v Speaker 8>What AI has done and all these other dynamic changes

0:21:10.680 --> 0:21:13.520
<v Speaker 8>is it means terminal values are very hard to figure out.

0:21:14.560 --> 0:21:18.440
<v Speaker 8>So if you take software sasmageddon or sas apocalypse, it's

0:21:18.480 --> 0:21:21.359
<v Speaker 8>shortened the time rise. You know, earnings are great, but

0:21:21.640 --> 0:21:24.200
<v Speaker 8>you don't have terminal values. So think very hard about

0:21:24.240 --> 0:21:25.040
<v Speaker 8>terminal values.

0:21:25.680 --> 0:21:27.320
<v Speaker 5>Do you think some of the sell off and some

0:21:27.400 --> 0:21:30.720
<v Speaker 5>of these software stories which were so well regarded for

0:21:30.760 --> 0:21:32.920
<v Speaker 5>so many years. Is that overdone?

0:21:33.560 --> 0:21:37.360
<v Speaker 8>Some of them might be, But look at Claude came

0:21:37.400 --> 0:21:41.200
<v Speaker 8>out with Mythos yesterday. It's going to eviscerate a lot

0:21:41.240 --> 0:21:43.320
<v Speaker 8>of cybersecurity stocks and.

0:21:43.320 --> 0:21:49.040
<v Speaker 3>Firms so powerful. Yeah, so right, Andrew peroled with us

0:21:49.040 --> 0:21:53.280
<v Speaker 3>and we continue partner cio. Hi Vista strategy is truly

0:21:53.320 --> 0:21:57.439
<v Speaker 3>definitive at Harvard Business School. Mister Kaplan was in the

0:21:57.480 --> 0:22:01.280
<v Speaker 3>other day of the Dallas Fed and Goldbin's an original

0:22:01.320 --> 0:22:04.000
<v Speaker 3>interview I did years ago with Quinn Mills. It's just

0:22:04.119 --> 0:22:07.840
<v Speaker 3>been very kind to Team Surveillance. I want you to

0:22:07.920 --> 0:22:12.760
<v Speaker 3>speak now to the graduate students across this nation looking

0:22:12.840 --> 0:22:15.880
<v Speaker 3>for a job. And it ain't happened in the first

0:22:15.960 --> 0:22:19.640
<v Speaker 3>week at April. We've been here before. This too will

0:22:19.720 --> 0:22:22.879
<v Speaker 3>pass or is there something different going on from newly

0:22:22.960 --> 0:22:25.040
<v Speaker 3>minted top tier MBAs.

0:22:25.600 --> 0:22:28.359
<v Speaker 8>It's going to pass, but it's going to take time

0:22:28.800 --> 0:22:32.679
<v Speaker 8>until so. AI will destroy, but AI will create, and

0:22:32.760 --> 0:22:35.480
<v Speaker 8>we're going to go through a period of destruction before

0:22:35.520 --> 0:22:37.840
<v Speaker 8>you get creation. So what do you do in the meantime?

0:22:38.160 --> 0:22:41.840
<v Speaker 8>Build your human capital? Realize that your human capital is

0:22:41.880 --> 0:22:43.119
<v Speaker 8>the only real asset you have.

0:22:43.240 --> 0:22:44.280
<v Speaker 9>It's worth a fortune.

0:22:44.840 --> 0:22:49.000
<v Speaker 8>Invest in it make connections. Think of skills that you need,

0:22:49.119 --> 0:22:50.919
<v Speaker 8>now invest in those. And if you don't have a

0:22:50.920 --> 0:22:53.359
<v Speaker 8>great job for the next year, so what invest in

0:22:53.359 --> 0:22:55.680
<v Speaker 8>your human capital. It's the best thing you can do.

0:22:56.359 --> 0:22:59.160
<v Speaker 3>Look at you know where we are, and everybody's telling

0:22:59.200 --> 0:23:01.760
<v Speaker 3>me out there where AI is going to create jobs?

0:23:02.359 --> 0:23:03.200
<v Speaker 2>Is that a hope?

0:23:03.400 --> 0:23:06.320
<v Speaker 3>Which is a word I everything in literature. I circle

0:23:06.359 --> 0:23:09.520
<v Speaker 3>when I see the word hope is trouble? The answer

0:23:09.600 --> 0:23:12.280
<v Speaker 3>is there is there a model where you see job

0:23:12.359 --> 0:23:14.800
<v Speaker 3>creation or is it just simply a hope?

0:23:15.240 --> 0:23:17.840
<v Speaker 8>I think it's like the Internet. Look but look at

0:23:18.119 --> 0:23:20.280
<v Speaker 8>all of the businesses around today. I would never have

0:23:20.359 --> 0:23:22.720
<v Speaker 8>existed without the Internet. And look at the employment rate

0:23:23.160 --> 0:23:26.600
<v Speaker 8>it's low. How's that possible? The jobs created in with

0:23:26.960 --> 0:23:30.119
<v Speaker 8>new tech or extraordinary? It may take a while this time.

0:23:31.560 --> 0:23:35.119
<v Speaker 5>Where do you put the AI on this companium of

0:23:35.600 --> 0:23:39.600
<v Speaker 5>I've heard someone I'll say, hey, you got electricity really high,

0:23:39.760 --> 0:23:42.639
<v Speaker 5>the Internet a little bit lower. AI is probably just

0:23:42.680 --> 0:23:46.840
<v Speaker 5>below electricity in terms of its importance to mankind? Do

0:23:46.840 --> 0:23:47.960
<v Speaker 5>you take it to that level?

0:23:48.080 --> 0:23:50.240
<v Speaker 8>One hundred percent? I used to think there was a

0:23:50.320 --> 0:23:53.600
<v Speaker 8>chance it would fizzle out. Okay, and now when you

0:23:53.640 --> 0:23:57.680
<v Speaker 8>see the rapidity and the impact. It feels like it's

0:23:57.760 --> 0:23:59.280
<v Speaker 8>it's a total game finger.

0:23:59.400 --> 0:23:59.879
<v Speaker 2>Can you do it?

0:24:00.200 --> 0:24:02.720
<v Speaker 3>Study in the Boston Red Sox. Can we get something

0:24:02.760 --> 0:24:04.520
<v Speaker 3>done here before the end of the year.

0:24:04.560 --> 0:24:05.560
<v Speaker 9>We know the answer.

0:24:06.359 --> 0:24:09.080
<v Speaker 8>They only went a few times every two centuries, so

0:24:09.160 --> 0:24:10.879
<v Speaker 8>we know the answer is not a good case study.

0:24:10.880 --> 0:24:12.960
<v Speaker 2>There, We're good. There's the case study. Thank you so

0:24:13.080 --> 0:24:15.159
<v Speaker 2>much for coming in. Please don't be a stranger. Andrey

0:24:15.200 --> 0:24:18.399
<v Speaker 2>Perld with us of h Legendary.

0:24:17.760 --> 0:24:21.800
<v Speaker 3>At HBS, I should say in partners Cio High Vistas Strategies,

0:24:23.680 --> 0:24:27.880
<v Speaker 3>stay with us. More from Bloomberg Surveillance coming up after this.

0:24:35.119 --> 0:24:38.720
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Catch us live

0:24:38.760 --> 0:24:41.919
<v Speaker 1>weekday afternoons from seven to ten am Eastern Listen on

0:24:42.000 --> 0:24:45.399
<v Speaker 1>Apple Karplay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app,

0:24:45.600 --> 0:24:47.280
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:24:47.640 --> 0:24:51.080
<v Speaker 3>Courtney Rosenberger Gellman joins us working with Jason Trener and

0:24:51.160 --> 0:24:56.200
<v Speaker 3>Dan Clifton, strategist Securities, and we welcome her this morning.

0:24:56.320 --> 0:24:56.760
<v Speaker 2>Courtney.

0:24:56.920 --> 0:25:00.440
<v Speaker 3>One of your great focuses is NATO. I would suggest

0:25:00.560 --> 0:25:03.920
<v Speaker 3>it's incredibly off the American radar.

0:25:04.320 --> 0:25:05.640
<v Speaker 2>Let's start with the why.

0:25:06.240 --> 0:25:11.040
<v Speaker 3>Why should we focus on this fractious relationship between President

0:25:11.080 --> 0:25:12.800
<v Speaker 3>and Trump in NATO.

0:25:14.480 --> 0:25:15.399
<v Speaker 7>Thank you for having me.

0:25:15.840 --> 0:25:18.199
<v Speaker 10>I mean, we even NATO is just something that's missing,

0:25:18.359 --> 0:25:20.840
<v Speaker 10>you know, something that's being underpriced by investors. And it's

0:25:20.840 --> 0:25:22.760
<v Speaker 10>certainly not our base case that there's going to be

0:25:23.400 --> 0:25:26.040
<v Speaker 10>a US withdrawal from NATO. But I do think that

0:25:26.119 --> 0:25:28.760
<v Speaker 10>there's a little bit of complacency when we talk to

0:25:29.800 --> 0:25:32.159
<v Speaker 10>investors and others who are who are in the space

0:25:32.520 --> 0:25:34.960
<v Speaker 10>about the fact that there's this law that prevents the

0:25:35.000 --> 0:25:37.480
<v Speaker 10>president from withdrawing. But the president has a number of

0:25:37.560 --> 0:25:40.640
<v Speaker 10>other options that he can take that can weaken NATO

0:25:41.600 --> 0:25:45.080
<v Speaker 10>or kind of withdraw the US kind of a name

0:25:45.640 --> 0:25:48.080
<v Speaker 10>or at least in practice from NATO. So we see

0:25:48.080 --> 0:25:50.560
<v Speaker 10>it's very important and just important in terms of how

0:25:50.600 --> 0:25:53.200
<v Speaker 10>the US interacts with the rest of the world, especially

0:25:53.280 --> 0:25:55.639
<v Speaker 10>as we do enter this period where it seems like

0:25:55.760 --> 0:26:00.040
<v Speaker 10>geopolitical conflict is kind of becoming Hotter.

0:26:00.480 --> 0:26:01.399
<v Speaker 2>Explain them to me.

0:26:01.520 --> 0:26:04.119
<v Speaker 3>I'm still in shock over the idea that NATO and

0:26:04.200 --> 0:26:07.159
<v Speaker 3>Brussels there's a Swedish flag and a Finnish flag. Our

0:26:07.200 --> 0:26:12.400
<v Speaker 3>Francis Lacroix with their reward acclaimed conversation with mister Stubbs

0:26:12.480 --> 0:26:16.200
<v Speaker 3>of Finland what to Finland and Sweden is the newbies.

0:26:16.600 --> 0:26:19.159
<v Speaker 3>What do they think of all this tension of this

0:26:19.359 --> 0:26:21.200
<v Speaker 3>agreement back to the Atlantic Charter.

0:26:22.800 --> 0:26:24.760
<v Speaker 10>Well, I'm not sure what they think specifically, but I mean,

0:26:24.800 --> 0:26:27.760
<v Speaker 10>if I were then they joined NATO in an effort

0:26:28.760 --> 0:26:31.760
<v Speaker 10>to thinking that they were joining a coalition that was

0:26:31.840 --> 0:26:35.040
<v Speaker 10>going to be able to help them defend against threats

0:26:35.480 --> 0:26:38.560
<v Speaker 10>that are again becoming more and more prominent. And it

0:26:38.640 --> 0:26:42.720
<v Speaker 10>seems like this alliance is weakening, and again you have

0:26:42.800 --> 0:26:46.280
<v Speaker 10>the administration not threatening to withdraw from it entirely. And

0:26:46.359 --> 0:26:49.560
<v Speaker 10>if the US withdraws from NATO, does NATO still really exist?

0:26:49.640 --> 0:26:52.120
<v Speaker 10>I think that that's the larger question. So I'm sure

0:26:52.119 --> 0:26:53.800
<v Speaker 10>that there's concerns about the fact that they made these

0:26:53.840 --> 0:26:57.000
<v Speaker 10>efforts to join an institution that it seems like it's deteriorating.

0:26:57.800 --> 0:27:01.240
<v Speaker 5>Courtney, what do you think is would be a reasonably

0:27:01.520 --> 0:27:06.520
<v Speaker 5>decent scenario here for the US to get out of

0:27:06.680 --> 0:27:10.000
<v Speaker 5>this conflict in Iran? The reasons for getting inter in

0:27:10.119 --> 0:27:11.520
<v Speaker 5>in the first place, I think for a lot of

0:27:11.560 --> 0:27:13.080
<v Speaker 5>people remain unclear.

0:27:13.560 --> 0:27:14.439
<v Speaker 9>So maybe that makes it.

0:27:14.520 --> 0:27:17.200
<v Speaker 5>More difficult to actually get out of Iran in a

0:27:17.359 --> 0:27:18.080
<v Speaker 5>successful way.

0:27:18.400 --> 0:27:21.480
<v Speaker 2>How do you view that we have a lot of questions.

0:27:21.520 --> 0:27:24.520
<v Speaker 10>I mean, certainly there's no good answers at this point.

0:27:24.600 --> 0:27:26.879
<v Speaker 10>The president was boxed in, and that's why you have

0:27:27.040 --> 0:27:30.000
<v Speaker 10>this ceasefire that was agreed to you for two weeks

0:27:30.040 --> 0:27:32.440
<v Speaker 10>that has kind of unclear parameters. But the US and

0:27:32.440 --> 0:27:36.000
<v Speaker 10>Iran seeming to have agreed to negotiate different points. So

0:27:36.040 --> 0:27:37.680
<v Speaker 10>I think that there's a lot of questions about what

0:27:37.960 --> 0:27:39.960
<v Speaker 10>ultimately this will look like. But we do think that

0:27:40.040 --> 0:27:41.840
<v Speaker 10>the president wants to get out of Iran and move

0:27:41.880 --> 0:27:45.080
<v Speaker 10>on to other priorities. The fact that Jade Vance, Vice

0:27:45.080 --> 0:27:48.520
<v Speaker 10>President Vance was appointed to lead these negotiations, I think

0:27:48.640 --> 0:27:51.320
<v Speaker 10>is important just because of the headlines about how he

0:27:51.520 --> 0:27:54.480
<v Speaker 10>was opposed to going into Iran and the military action.

0:27:55.160 --> 0:27:57.480
<v Speaker 10>So if he is running point on this and the

0:27:57.520 --> 0:27:59.760
<v Speaker 10>ceasefire does hold, I think the US is going to

0:27:59.800 --> 0:28:02.280
<v Speaker 10>look for any option that it can take to not

0:28:02.480 --> 0:28:05.960
<v Speaker 10>have a military conflict extent. I do think that there's

0:28:05.960 --> 0:28:07.960
<v Speaker 10>probably going to be a good deal of trying to

0:28:08.040 --> 0:28:13.280
<v Speaker 10>give Iran what it wants reasonably, so probably kind of

0:28:13.440 --> 0:28:16.760
<v Speaker 10>more concessions than kind of might have been thought about

0:28:17.320 --> 0:28:20.680
<v Speaker 10>six weeks ago in terms of Iran's control of the streets,

0:28:21.320 --> 0:28:23.919
<v Speaker 10>allowing them to impost tolls sanctions really.

0:28:24.040 --> 0:28:25.159
<v Speaker 7>In some of those other measures.

0:28:25.320 --> 0:28:29.440
<v Speaker 3>The first sentence of our claim top life go says

0:28:29.640 --> 0:28:32.160
<v Speaker 3>the White House said the US will hold.

0:28:32.000 --> 0:28:35.680
<v Speaker 2>Direct talks with Iran. Ok. I don't know what that means.

0:28:35.720 --> 0:28:38.120
<v Speaker 3>That's how fluid this is right now. And it's such

0:28:38.160 --> 0:28:42.000
<v Speaker 3>a privilege to speak to Courtney Rosenberger Gelman because Paul,

0:28:42.120 --> 0:28:45.000
<v Speaker 3>this is the key, as you mentioned, am I right,

0:28:45.200 --> 0:28:47.360
<v Speaker 3>Islamabad Friday or Saturday.

0:28:47.840 --> 0:28:51.600
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, that's the zeitgeist right now, and vice President of

0:28:51.640 --> 0:28:53.080
<v Speaker 5>VANCE will be there, and I'm not sure. And so

0:28:53.360 --> 0:28:56.520
<v Speaker 5>the question is will the US negotiate directly with or

0:28:56.520 --> 0:28:59.040
<v Speaker 5>any representations or through some Pakistani But.

0:28:59.080 --> 0:29:02.520
<v Speaker 3>This needs clarify case sure a lot into Thursday and Friday.

0:29:02.600 --> 0:29:06.560
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, So Accordney, again, what does this mean here for

0:29:06.960 --> 0:29:08.880
<v Speaker 5>the region in the Mid East? Here it seems like

0:29:09.000 --> 0:29:12.800
<v Speaker 5>even if there is a permanent cease fire here, things

0:29:12.840 --> 0:29:15.200
<v Speaker 5>have materially changed in the Mid East. How do you

0:29:15.320 --> 0:29:16.120
<v Speaker 5>view that going forward?

0:29:17.400 --> 0:29:18.400
<v Speaker 2>I think that that's correct.

0:29:18.480 --> 0:29:19.920
<v Speaker 7>I think we have a lot of questions.

0:29:20.040 --> 0:29:22.240
<v Speaker 10>Is this going to be something like the nineteen nineties

0:29:22.400 --> 0:29:27.000
<v Speaker 10>post Golf War, where there's several years of rebuilding of trust.

0:29:27.800 --> 0:29:30.440
<v Speaker 10>That's certainly a scenario. Is this going to be a

0:29:30.520 --> 0:29:34.400
<v Speaker 10>situation where trust is permanently gone between countries? Because I

0:29:34.440 --> 0:29:37.040
<v Speaker 10>think a lot of these Gulf nations are surprised and

0:29:37.160 --> 0:29:39.480
<v Speaker 10>upset I Ran for the fact that they attack them.

0:29:40.320 --> 0:29:42.040
<v Speaker 10>And then I also think, you know, we have to

0:29:42.360 --> 0:29:47.520
<v Speaker 10>consider does the fact that kind of geopolitics and war

0:29:47.600 --> 0:29:52.000
<v Speaker 10>around energy be coming back into focus? Does China try

0:29:52.080 --> 0:29:54.440
<v Speaker 10>to make moves into the Middle East? Does Russia trying

0:29:54.440 --> 0:29:56.120
<v Speaker 10>to make moves into the Middle East? Does I Ran

0:29:56.160 --> 0:29:58.360
<v Speaker 10>allow China to build a base. China only has one

0:29:58.400 --> 0:30:00.680
<v Speaker 10>base in the Middle East, one known base I should

0:30:00.680 --> 0:30:01.480
<v Speaker 10>stand in the Ely East.

0:30:01.800 --> 0:30:02.560
<v Speaker 7>So does it become a.

0:30:02.600 --> 0:30:04.440
<v Speaker 10>Center of geopolitical conflict as well?

0:30:04.600 --> 0:30:06.680
<v Speaker 3>A lot of questions Courtney, you got to put up

0:30:06.720 --> 0:30:09.520
<v Speaker 3>with Dan Clifton, which is, you know, a weight into itself,

0:30:09.920 --> 0:30:14.880
<v Speaker 3>synthesize your work and the rest is strtiguous securities work.

0:30:15.640 --> 0:30:18.640
<v Speaker 3>Is President Trump a lane duck right now?

0:30:18.920 --> 0:30:21.000
<v Speaker 2>What is the thought of your Washington shop?

0:30:22.680 --> 0:30:25.400
<v Speaker 10>I mean, definitionally, he is because he is not able

0:30:25.480 --> 0:30:27.440
<v Speaker 10>to run for reelection, but he still has a lot

0:30:27.480 --> 0:30:29.280
<v Speaker 10>of power and a lot of sway over the party.

0:30:30.160 --> 0:30:32.200
<v Speaker 10>He is the face of the Republican Party. So we

0:30:32.280 --> 0:30:34.560
<v Speaker 10>don't see him as kind of not able to implement

0:30:34.680 --> 0:30:37.719
<v Speaker 10>policy at this point. He has proved that he can

0:30:37.840 --> 0:30:41.200
<v Speaker 10>use executive authority to implement an agenda really without the

0:30:41.280 --> 0:30:44.040
<v Speaker 10>need for much from Congress. So we still see a

0:30:44.120 --> 0:30:48.600
<v Speaker 10>lot of investment implications and outcomes that can come from

0:30:48.640 --> 0:30:49.880
<v Speaker 10>the President using his authority.

0:30:50.240 --> 0:30:52.760
<v Speaker 3>Courtney, thank you so much, really appreciate it. This morning

0:30:52.800 --> 0:30:56.880
<v Speaker 3>and important brief Courtney Rosenberger at Gilman with Jason Trenton's

0:30:56.880 --> 0:30:59.320
<v Speaker 3>Strateiga's Securities.

0:30:58.760 --> 0:31:01.719
<v Speaker 2>In part Stay with us.

0:31:02.040 --> 0:31:05.120
<v Speaker 3>More from Bloomberg Surveillance coming up after this.

0:31:12.520 --> 0:31:16.080
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Catch us live

0:31:16.160 --> 0:31:19.280
<v Speaker 1>weekday afternoons from seven to ten am Eastern Listen on

0:31:19.400 --> 0:31:22.720
<v Speaker 1>Apple Karplay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app,

0:31:23.000 --> 0:31:24.680
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:31:25.080 --> 0:31:27.200
<v Speaker 3>Andrew Jackson joins us. Now we are thrilled to do

0:31:27.320 --> 0:31:30.560
<v Speaker 3>this is a Vaunteville asset management. You may not know

0:31:30.720 --> 0:31:34.440
<v Speaker 3>that wonderful European and Swiss shop as well. He is

0:31:34.520 --> 0:31:38.040
<v Speaker 3>in Zurich and joins us in studio today as well.

0:31:38.600 --> 0:31:40.440
<v Speaker 3>Yesterday I came in and the first thing I looked

0:31:40.480 --> 0:31:43.960
<v Speaker 3>at is Swiss Frank is a flight to quality. This war,

0:31:44.760 --> 0:31:47.880
<v Speaker 3>Given all of the independence of Switzerland, its heritage back

0:31:48.360 --> 0:31:52.920
<v Speaker 3>a zillion years, how does this work look from Zurich.

0:31:54.360 --> 0:31:57.320
<v Speaker 11>It's not great news story for those of you who

0:31:57.400 --> 0:31:59.600
<v Speaker 11>sit in You're right, the strength of the Swiss Frank

0:31:59.880 --> 0:32:02.920
<v Speaker 11>is not fantastic. But as a as a business based

0:32:02.960 --> 0:32:06.680
<v Speaker 11>in Zurich, it's really positive. People are looking around the world,

0:32:06.720 --> 0:32:11.000
<v Speaker 11>there's a sort of geopolitical mailstream occurring, and they're looking

0:32:11.040 --> 0:32:15.000
<v Speaker 11>for stabilization. They're looking for stability, they're looking for no nonsense.

0:32:15.160 --> 0:32:16.840
<v Speaker 11>You know, I know what I'm going to get from you,

0:32:17.200 --> 0:32:20.200
<v Speaker 11>and Switzerland provides that, and that's a nice news story

0:32:20.360 --> 0:32:23.800
<v Speaker 11>for Zurich based companies. It's a nice news story for

0:32:23.960 --> 0:32:28.080
<v Speaker 11>Swiss banks generally. But then also in the background, you've

0:32:28.160 --> 0:32:32.000
<v Speaker 11>got some you know, uncertainty about the regulatory backdrop in Switzerland,

0:32:32.200 --> 0:32:34.680
<v Speaker 11>which is the headwind that we're facing as we sit

0:32:34.760 --> 0:32:35.560
<v Speaker 11>in Switzerland.

0:32:35.960 --> 0:32:38.760
<v Speaker 3>Paul, this is the precursor to jpm Worgan's earnings After

0:32:38.840 --> 0:32:39.680
<v Speaker 3>the Diamond Letter.

0:32:40.480 --> 0:32:43.960
<v Speaker 5>Life goes on, it does andrew in the world of

0:32:44.000 --> 0:32:47.120
<v Speaker 5>fixed income in the last six seven weeks, with all

0:32:47.240 --> 0:32:50.120
<v Speaker 5>this uncertainly on the geopolitical front with Iran, what are

0:32:50.160 --> 0:32:52.920
<v Speaker 5>your clients asking you, is it where we should maybe

0:32:53.040 --> 0:32:56.120
<v Speaker 5>allocate some capital outside of the US In the US,

0:32:56.280 --> 0:32:58.080
<v Speaker 5>I mean, what's the regional play for you.

0:32:58.880 --> 0:33:01.920
<v Speaker 11>There's three questions that people are asking. First question they're

0:33:01.920 --> 0:33:04.680
<v Speaker 11>asking is what's the medium and long term perspective on

0:33:05.000 --> 0:33:08.200
<v Speaker 11>global economy US trading relationship with the rest of the world.

0:33:08.280 --> 0:33:11.320
<v Speaker 11>That's a very complex problem that we could spend hours

0:33:11.360 --> 0:33:14.640
<v Speaker 11>talking about. The second is what happens to the US dollar? Candidly,

0:33:14.760 --> 0:33:17.560
<v Speaker 11>that is a major topic of conversation. And then the

0:33:17.680 --> 0:33:21.240
<v Speaker 11>third is how should we allocate our capital with this

0:33:21.480 --> 0:33:24.400
<v Speaker 11>level of uncertainty and how should we trade our capital

0:33:24.440 --> 0:33:27.160
<v Speaker 11>with this level of uncertainty. The response that we're giving

0:33:27.400 --> 0:33:30.200
<v Speaker 11>is this is an environment in which you should be trading.

0:33:30.440 --> 0:33:33.040
<v Speaker 11>You should be moving your portfolio a mound around a

0:33:33.240 --> 0:33:36.280
<v Speaker 11>higher level of turnover in this setting than you would

0:33:36.320 --> 0:33:39.600
<v Speaker 11>do in normal circumstances. Yesterday is a great example. Yesterday

0:33:39.680 --> 0:33:42.480
<v Speaker 11>wasn't a rally. It was a short squeeze plus a rally,

0:33:42.800 --> 0:33:45.040
<v Speaker 11>and that's why it was so powerful. There were a

0:33:45.240 --> 0:33:48.200
<v Speaker 11>lot of shorts that had their fingers burnt yesterday, and

0:33:48.320 --> 0:33:50.520
<v Speaker 11>a lot of the price action was around shorts. That's

0:33:50.560 --> 0:33:52.760
<v Speaker 11>why I think we're seeing the top come off of

0:33:52.840 --> 0:33:55.600
<v Speaker 11>some of those moves from yesterday. So we were encouraging

0:33:55.640 --> 0:33:58.080
<v Speaker 11>our clients to be a bit more active to trade

0:33:58.160 --> 0:34:01.200
<v Speaker 11>these markets a little more because the uncertainty, the short

0:34:01.280 --> 0:34:04.960
<v Speaker 11>term uncertainty, is maybe clouding your vision that over the

0:34:05.000 --> 0:34:07.960
<v Speaker 11>long term things are more predictable than they are over

0:34:08.040 --> 0:34:09.640
<v Speaker 11>that sort of daily cycle.

0:34:09.760 --> 0:34:11.320
<v Speaker 5>And I think a lot of folks are saying, to

0:34:11.400 --> 0:34:14.080
<v Speaker 5>the extent you can afford to look past the short

0:34:14.160 --> 0:34:17.719
<v Speaker 5>term volatility, fundamentals are pretty solid out there. We're going

0:34:17.800 --> 0:34:20.080
<v Speaker 5>to get earning starting next week, as Tom's mentioned with

0:34:20.160 --> 0:34:23.840
<v Speaker 5>JP Morgan, we'll kick it off. Economic trends seem pretty solid,

0:34:23.960 --> 0:34:28.440
<v Speaker 5>Earning seem pretty solid. You know, rates are steady at

0:34:28.480 --> 0:34:29.800
<v Speaker 5>probably the worst case scenario.

0:34:30.080 --> 0:34:32.040
<v Speaker 9>So I don't know, Yeah, I totally agree with you.

0:34:32.120 --> 0:34:35.560
<v Speaker 11>I think credit fundamentals in particular look rock solid almost everywhere.

0:34:36.000 --> 0:34:38.279
<v Speaker 11>At this point in a credit cycle, having been so

0:34:38.520 --> 0:34:41.320
<v Speaker 11>long since we last had a credit cycle, you'd expect

0:34:41.400 --> 0:34:44.080
<v Speaker 11>HI yield to start to look worse, leverage to start

0:34:44.160 --> 0:34:46.839
<v Speaker 11>creeping up, you to have more worries. There are less

0:34:46.960 --> 0:34:50.200
<v Speaker 11>worries than you would actually think private credit aside, the

0:34:50.360 --> 0:34:54.000
<v Speaker 11>software exposure aside. Other than that, credit fundamentals look strong,

0:34:54.040 --> 0:34:57.400
<v Speaker 11>which is why I think technicals were so good in

0:34:57.520 --> 0:35:01.600
<v Speaker 11>fixed income rates aside, the credit side of fixed income

0:35:01.680 --> 0:35:03.480
<v Speaker 11>did very well over the last four weeks.

0:35:03.560 --> 0:35:06.040
<v Speaker 2>Andrew Jackson vauntable with us and we continue here.

0:35:06.160 --> 0:35:11.279
<v Speaker 3>Lots coming up, Claudias sim later, Mark Champions scheduled as well.

0:35:11.800 --> 0:35:13.960
<v Speaker 3>One of the heroes in my house as a kid

0:35:14.120 --> 0:35:17.680
<v Speaker 3>was James Clerk Maxwell, which is magnetism. It's actually, folks,

0:35:18.040 --> 0:35:19.560
<v Speaker 3>pretty difficult mathematics.

0:35:19.600 --> 0:35:20.680
<v Speaker 2>I didn't do that well at it.

0:35:21.080 --> 0:35:24.160
<v Speaker 3>You darkened the door at King's College in London, where

0:35:24.239 --> 0:35:27.040
<v Speaker 3>he was absolutely iconic as well.

0:35:27.360 --> 0:35:28.440
<v Speaker 2>You know the variables.

0:35:28.520 --> 0:35:31.600
<v Speaker 3>There's an epsilon on the back end of every equation,

0:35:32.160 --> 0:35:35.680
<v Speaker 3>which is the unknown risk out there, the systemic risk

0:35:36.000 --> 0:35:40.359
<v Speaker 3>measure right now for the pros listening the epsilon that's

0:35:40.400 --> 0:35:40.839
<v Speaker 3>out there.

0:35:41.440 --> 0:35:44.880
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, I think it's meaningful as a brit here in

0:35:45.040 --> 0:35:48.520
<v Speaker 11>New York, our relationship with the US is the starting point.

0:35:48.920 --> 0:35:49.080
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:35:49.440 --> 0:35:51.319
<v Speaker 11>I've been asked by a number of people, how are

0:35:51.360 --> 0:35:53.920
<v Speaker 11>you feeling here in New York? New York was my

0:35:54.040 --> 0:35:56.040
<v Speaker 11>second home for many many years. I used to come

0:35:56.080 --> 0:35:59.400
<v Speaker 11>here regularly. I've worked here for a while and that

0:35:59.600 --> 0:36:05.000
<v Speaker 11>has changed and that shift. It's got wider ramifications than

0:36:05.080 --> 0:36:08.720
<v Speaker 11>people realize, and that level of uncertainty is making investors,

0:36:08.760 --> 0:36:11.960
<v Speaker 11>I think, are a little more uncomfortable, and they're being

0:36:12.040 --> 0:36:14.920
<v Speaker 11>forced to diversify away from where they used to previously

0:36:15.760 --> 0:36:20.320
<v Speaker 11>put their bets. And I think for me, it's easy

0:36:20.400 --> 0:36:22.439
<v Speaker 11>to talk about how much uncertainty there is. You don't

0:36:22.440 --> 0:36:25.200
<v Speaker 11>want to get irrationally sort of bearish about things. I'm

0:36:25.200 --> 0:36:27.000
<v Speaker 11>a fixed income guy, so it's easy for me to

0:36:27.040 --> 0:36:30.839
<v Speaker 11>see the downside. But there is a very very large

0:36:30.920 --> 0:36:33.440
<v Speaker 11>level of uncertainty, and the US's relationship with the rest

0:36:33.440 --> 0:36:34.960
<v Speaker 11>of the world is critical to that.

0:36:35.360 --> 0:36:38.560
<v Speaker 3>Reading a fobosi, what do you do given the stress

0:36:38.880 --> 0:36:42.960
<v Speaker 3>with duration? Is it efficacious to play duration or do

0:36:43.040 --> 0:36:43.680
<v Speaker 3>you just hide?

0:36:44.239 --> 0:36:45.239
<v Speaker 2>No, I don't think you hide.

0:36:45.360 --> 0:36:46.560
<v Speaker 9>I think you have to be involved.

0:36:46.600 --> 0:36:48.759
<v Speaker 11>I think you probably have to trade it. Going back

0:36:48.800 --> 0:36:51.680
<v Speaker 11>to the theme, do I think the move in short

0:36:51.800 --> 0:36:54.080
<v Speaker 11>end rates over the last four weeks has been rational?

0:36:54.200 --> 0:36:54.359
<v Speaker 2>Yes?

0:36:54.440 --> 0:36:57.040
<v Speaker 11>I actually actually do you know? Strength of horll moves

0:36:57.120 --> 0:37:00.480
<v Speaker 11>closed is bad for information, particularly in Germany, and therefore

0:37:00.560 --> 0:37:03.800
<v Speaker 11>short end rates should be moving around. The ECB setting

0:37:03.880 --> 0:37:07.440
<v Speaker 11>has fundamentally shifted over the last six weeks. Six weeks ago,

0:37:07.640 --> 0:37:10.080
<v Speaker 11>no one would have predicted the ECB would raise rates

0:37:10.120 --> 0:37:12.800
<v Speaker 11>in the next twenty four months. Now we have to

0:37:12.880 --> 0:37:16.319
<v Speaker 11>price that in that level of uncertainty, and that confidence

0:37:16.400 --> 0:37:18.680
<v Speaker 11>that we were only heading on a down with trajectory

0:37:18.719 --> 0:37:22.680
<v Speaker 11>in terms of underlying rates has been eroded. But to

0:37:22.800 --> 0:37:25.360
<v Speaker 11>play duration, I think, yeah, there's lots of parts of

0:37:25.440 --> 0:37:28.440
<v Speaker 11>the curve that you can play duration. The longer dates,

0:37:28.719 --> 0:37:30.880
<v Speaker 11>I think you've got a higher degree of confidence because

0:37:30.960 --> 0:37:33.319
<v Speaker 11>medium term confidence is higher than that short end.

0:37:34.360 --> 0:37:38.040
<v Speaker 5>When about a year ago, just today, almost when the

0:37:39.160 --> 0:37:43.200
<v Speaker 5>tariffs really came into effect, there was a sale of

0:37:43.400 --> 0:37:48.680
<v Speaker 5>US assets, the dollar, bonds, stocks, How has that trade

0:37:48.680 --> 0:37:51.000
<v Speaker 5>these days? How are your clients thinking about the US

0:37:51.200 --> 0:37:54.239
<v Speaker 5>versus rest of world? Because we did see a lot

0:37:54.280 --> 0:37:58.040
<v Speaker 5>of those funds come back to the US, but now

0:37:58.080 --> 0:37:59.479
<v Speaker 5>the world's changed it yet again.

0:38:00.160 --> 0:38:02.600
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, I think the big theme that we saw in

0:38:02.719 --> 0:38:04.880
<v Speaker 11>the back end of last year, and it wasn't necessarily

0:38:04.920 --> 0:38:10.440
<v Speaker 11>as a direct result of the tariff conversations, but people

0:38:10.600 --> 0:38:13.320
<v Speaker 11>shifted to thinking about emerging market fixed income and emerging

0:38:13.360 --> 0:38:17.640
<v Speaker 11>market equities again in real fashion, in order to provide

0:38:17.640 --> 0:38:21.040
<v Speaker 11>them diversification, not necessarily as a return play, but as

0:38:21.080 --> 0:38:24.640
<v Speaker 11>a diversification play. People still talk about US high yield,

0:38:24.680 --> 0:38:26.799
<v Speaker 11>of course they do. I was in Chile a couple

0:38:26.840 --> 0:38:29.319
<v Speaker 11>of weeks ago. They're still allocating to US high yield,

0:38:29.400 --> 0:38:32.319
<v Speaker 11>but their allocation to US highyield is probably lower than

0:38:32.360 --> 0:38:35.800
<v Speaker 11>their allocation to emerging market fixed income right now. And

0:38:35.920 --> 0:38:38.560
<v Speaker 11>within equities land, yes, of course they're going to allocate

0:38:38.600 --> 0:38:41.200
<v Speaker 11>to US equities, but they're definitely going to start looking

0:38:41.239 --> 0:38:43.560
<v Speaker 11>at emerging market equities again. So I think that's the

0:38:43.680 --> 0:38:46.759
<v Speaker 11>long term ramifications of what we saw last year. And

0:38:46.880 --> 0:38:49.120
<v Speaker 11>I thought the price action that we saw last year

0:38:49.280 --> 0:38:52.279
<v Speaker 11>post the tariff talk, you know, that was very irrationally.

0:38:53.440 --> 0:38:55.799
<v Speaker 11>That was a very irrational move. We've stabilized from there,

0:38:56.200 --> 0:39:00.239
<v Speaker 11>this more recent move from the outside in. I would

0:39:00.320 --> 0:39:02.880
<v Speaker 11>it expected this the Uranian conflict to have been a

0:39:02.960 --> 0:39:05.600
<v Speaker 11>bigger deal for markets than what we saw last year.

0:39:05.800 --> 0:39:08.880
<v Speaker 2>Andrew I was almost fired once. Okay, I can't believe

0:39:08.920 --> 0:39:09.440
<v Speaker 2>that's Zurich.

0:39:09.760 --> 0:39:12.879
<v Speaker 3>Okay, Al from New Jersey costs me up and he goes,

0:39:13.040 --> 0:39:15.840
<v Speaker 3>how much did you spend at the McDonald's down the

0:39:15.880 --> 0:39:16.960
<v Speaker 3>street from Vauntable.

0:39:17.440 --> 0:39:19.920
<v Speaker 2>Are the prices of Zurich still stupid? Insane?

0:39:20.280 --> 0:39:21.640
<v Speaker 11>I wateringly insane?

0:39:22.800 --> 0:39:25.759
<v Speaker 2>It's it's it's like McDonald's way back then was twenty

0:39:25.840 --> 0:39:28.239
<v Speaker 2>five bucks. Yeah, it must be like forty bucks now.

0:39:28.560 --> 0:39:32.080
<v Speaker 11>But Tom, the quid pro quote for that is everything works.

0:39:33.040 --> 0:39:36.000
<v Speaker 11>Everything works in Zurich. Everything's on times, on time, The

0:39:36.080 --> 0:39:38.320
<v Speaker 11>trains are on time, the tramp you can get a

0:39:38.440 --> 0:39:42.120
<v Speaker 11>countdown to when the trains arriving in seconds in Zurich.

0:39:42.640 --> 0:39:44.640
<v Speaker 11>So you've got something nice about being there.

0:39:44.920 --> 0:39:46.399
<v Speaker 2>You got Barretto, which is great.

0:39:46.400 --> 0:39:48.640
<v Speaker 3>It's this wooden bar folks, it looks like it's out

0:39:48.680 --> 0:39:51.640
<v Speaker 3>of the Spyo kitmen from the cold with this incredible

0:39:51.800 --> 0:39:55.520
<v Speaker 3>artwork on the walls. In these itty bitty Martinez that's

0:39:55.600 --> 0:40:00.840
<v Speaker 3>Barretto Barretta. They're like twenty euros each. Andrew, don't be

0:40:00.920 --> 0:40:03.440
<v Speaker 3>a stranger. Andrew Jackson, thank you so much.

0:40:03.560 --> 0:40:05.960
<v Speaker 2>With Vulntable Asset Management.

0:40:06.320 --> 0:40:11.120
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast, available on apples, Spotify,

0:40:11.280 --> 0:40:15.520
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each weekday,

0:40:15.680 --> 0:40:19.080
<v Speaker 1>seven to ten am Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com, the

0:40:19.200 --> 0:40:23.200
<v Speaker 1>iHeartRadio app, Tune In, and the Bloomberg Business App. You

0:40:23.280 --> 0:40:26.600
<v Speaker 1>can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube and

0:40:26.840 --> 0:40:28.560
<v Speaker 1>always on the Bloomberg terminal