WEBVTT - Why Your Relationship Checklist is Getting in Your Way & How to Stop Questioning if You are With the Right Person

0:00:01.639 --> 0:00:04.320
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of talk about mindfulness these days, which

0:00:04.360 --> 0:00:06.680
<v Speaker 1>is fantastic. I mean, we all want to be more

0:00:06.680 --> 0:00:11.240
<v Speaker 1>present and self aware, more patient, less judgmental. We discuss

0:00:11.320 --> 0:00:13.760
<v Speaker 1>all these themes on the podcast, but it's hard to

0:00:13.800 --> 0:00:17.119
<v Speaker 1>actually be mindful in your day to day life. That's

0:00:17.120 --> 0:00:19.919
<v Speaker 1>where Calm comes in. I've been working with Calm for

0:00:19.960 --> 0:00:22.640
<v Speaker 1>a few years now with the goal of making mindfulness

0:00:22.680 --> 0:00:25.479
<v Speaker 1>fun and easy. Calm has all sorts of content to

0:00:25.520 --> 0:00:29.560
<v Speaker 1>help you build positive habits, shift yourself talk, reframe your

0:00:29.600 --> 0:00:32.720
<v Speaker 1>negative thoughts, and generally feel better in your daily life.

0:00:33.280 --> 0:00:36.479
<v Speaker 1>So many incredible options from the most knowledgeable experts in

0:00:36.520 --> 0:00:40.520
<v Speaker 1>the world, along with renowned meditation teachers. You can also

0:00:40.640 --> 0:00:43.479
<v Speaker 1>check out my seven minute daily series to help you

0:00:43.560 --> 0:00:47.000
<v Speaker 1>live more mindfully each and every day. Right now, listeners

0:00:47.000 --> 0:00:49.680
<v Speaker 1>of On Purpose get forty percent off a subscription to

0:00:49.720 --> 0:00:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Calmpremium at Calm dot com Forward slash j that's Calm

0:00:54.720 --> 0:00:58.880
<v Speaker 1>dot com Forward slash jay for forty percent off Calm

0:00:58.880 --> 0:01:03.040
<v Speaker 1>your Mind, Change Life. We say we want those things,

0:01:03.520 --> 0:01:05.880
<v Speaker 1>but when we experience in reality, a lot of people

0:01:05.840 --> 0:01:09.440
<v Speaker 1>will say, Oh, they're so kind, they're so sweet, but

0:01:09.480 --> 0:01:12.280
<v Speaker 1>they're boring, and then the other person who's not kind

0:01:12.319 --> 0:01:16.640
<v Speaker 1>and sweet, they're exhilarating. It's a really weird contrast in

0:01:16.720 --> 0:01:19.440
<v Speaker 1>how we say we want someone who's kind, we want

0:01:19.480 --> 0:01:22.520
<v Speaker 1>someone who's thoughtful, but then when we experience them reality,

0:01:22.560 --> 0:01:25.480
<v Speaker 1>it's not fun. There's no chemistry, there's no spark right,

0:01:25.600 --> 0:01:28.200
<v Speaker 1>and then we often go for the person who's not kind,

0:01:28.680 --> 0:01:32.520
<v Speaker 1>not nurturing, not empathetic. What I'm getting at here is.

0:01:32.760 --> 0:01:36.920
<v Speaker 2>The number one health and wellness podcast set. Jay Shetty s.

0:01:41.400 --> 0:01:44.880
<v Speaker 1>Hey, everyone, welcome back to you On Purpose. I'm your host,

0:01:45.000 --> 0:01:48.919
<v Speaker 1>Jay Shetty. Thank you so much for turning up for yourself,

0:01:49.240 --> 0:01:52.160
<v Speaker 1>for turning up to the On Purpose show. I am

0:01:52.240 --> 0:01:55.920
<v Speaker 1>so grateful that you're here with me right now now.

0:01:55.920 --> 0:01:59.040
<v Speaker 1>If you're single and you're trying to figure out how

0:01:59.080 --> 0:02:02.840
<v Speaker 1>to find your person in this episode is for you.

0:02:03.520 --> 0:02:06.160
<v Speaker 1>If you're recently single and you're trying to figure out

0:02:06.480 --> 0:02:10.640
<v Speaker 1>what's going wrong, what mistakes are making This episode is

0:02:10.720 --> 0:02:13.640
<v Speaker 1>for you. And even if you're dating someone, even if

0:02:13.639 --> 0:02:16.280
<v Speaker 1>you're married, but you're trying to figure out how to

0:02:16.320 --> 0:02:21.000
<v Speaker 1>deepen your connection, how to understand more. Maybe you're even

0:02:21.120 --> 0:02:25.240
<v Speaker 1>questioning whether you're with the right person. This episode is

0:02:25.560 --> 0:02:29.200
<v Speaker 1>for you. I want to dive in to some really

0:02:29.280 --> 0:02:34.560
<v Speaker 1>interesting research today, and the research comes from the Pew

0:02:34.919 --> 0:02:41.480
<v Speaker 1>Research Center, and it talks about what men most value

0:02:41.480 --> 0:02:45.200
<v Speaker 1>in women and what women most value in men.

0:02:45.520 --> 0:02:46.960
<v Speaker 2>Now, I have to come clean with you.

0:02:47.000 --> 0:02:51.320
<v Speaker 1>To start off with, last night, my wife, my brother

0:02:51.360 --> 0:02:53.880
<v Speaker 1>in law, and my sister in law made me watch

0:02:53.919 --> 0:02:57.200
<v Speaker 1>my first ever episode of Love Island. I think it's

0:02:57.240 --> 0:03:01.600
<v Speaker 1>season six of the USA. The of the show. I'd

0:03:01.600 --> 0:03:05.760
<v Speaker 1>never watched an episode before in my life. And again,

0:03:06.360 --> 0:03:09.480
<v Speaker 1>today's episode is not inspired by that by any means,

0:03:09.680 --> 0:03:12.840
<v Speaker 1>but it was just fascinating to me as to how,

0:03:13.080 --> 0:03:18.120
<v Speaker 1>after years and years of research, technological advancement and everything else,

0:03:18.480 --> 0:03:21.080
<v Speaker 1>and even just seeing what works and what doesn't work,

0:03:21.720 --> 0:03:25.480
<v Speaker 1>what we focus on about other people is so limited

0:03:25.720 --> 0:03:29.000
<v Speaker 1>and so limiting. And it led me to go down

0:03:29.080 --> 0:03:32.239
<v Speaker 1>this rabbit hole when I was thinking about this episode

0:03:32.240 --> 0:03:36.480
<v Speaker 1>today and researching for the episode and asking myself, what

0:03:36.720 --> 0:03:39.840
<v Speaker 1>is it that we say is most important to us

0:03:40.000 --> 0:03:43.320
<v Speaker 1>in a potential partner? But then how do we get

0:03:43.360 --> 0:03:47.560
<v Speaker 1>carried away with what we're attracted to? Right? Let me

0:03:47.600 --> 0:03:51.000
<v Speaker 1>say that again, what is the difference between what we

0:03:51.120 --> 0:03:54.400
<v Speaker 1>say is important to us in a partner? And then

0:03:54.680 --> 0:03:57.680
<v Speaker 1>how do we get carried away with what we get

0:03:57.680 --> 0:04:03.560
<v Speaker 1>attracted to. And I think what I was originally thinking

0:04:03.600 --> 0:04:08.440
<v Speaker 1>about was this idea that we almost know what's good

0:04:08.480 --> 0:04:12.680
<v Speaker 1>for us, but we want what's bad for us. Right,

0:04:12.760 --> 0:04:16.160
<v Speaker 1>we know what's good for us, but we'll ignore all

0:04:16.200 --> 0:04:20.320
<v Speaker 1>of that. If there's something attractive, if there's something shiny,

0:04:20.400 --> 0:04:24.800
<v Speaker 1>if there's something exciting, if there's something invigoring, we're willing

0:04:24.839 --> 0:04:30.200
<v Speaker 1>to give up all of our good common sense. Now

0:04:30.720 --> 0:04:34.359
<v Speaker 1>let's actually look at the research. This was what traits

0:04:34.440 --> 0:04:37.640
<v Speaker 1>or characteristics do you think people in our society are

0:04:37.680 --> 0:04:38.640
<v Speaker 1>most attracted to?

0:04:39.279 --> 0:04:41.160
<v Speaker 2>So what do you think.

0:04:41.080 --> 0:04:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Men value most in women? Number one thing that came out?

0:04:46.839 --> 0:04:51.040
<v Speaker 1>What do you think it is? It was thirty five

0:04:51.160 --> 0:04:56.440
<v Speaker 1>percent said physical attractiveness is the most important thing they

0:04:56.520 --> 0:04:59.599
<v Speaker 1>value in a woman. I'm not surprised by that, and

0:04:59.640 --> 0:05:02.120
<v Speaker 1>I think think you hear that a lot, you see

0:05:02.120 --> 0:05:06.000
<v Speaker 1>that a lot. I think that has led to so

0:05:06.120 --> 0:05:09.680
<v Speaker 1>many challenges in our society where there's so much pressure

0:05:09.960 --> 0:05:13.680
<v Speaker 1>on appearance, there's so many enhancements of appearance, like it

0:05:13.720 --> 0:05:14.920
<v Speaker 1>all becomes about that.

0:05:16.200 --> 0:05:16.599
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:05:16.960 --> 0:05:19.800
<v Speaker 1>When women were asked what they most value in men,

0:05:20.200 --> 0:05:24.359
<v Speaker 1>what do you think that was? Thirty three percent said

0:05:24.480 --> 0:05:29.080
<v Speaker 1>honesty and morality. Now that's a really interesting one because

0:05:29.120 --> 0:05:31.440
<v Speaker 1>I think you end up watching videos on TikTok and

0:05:31.480 --> 0:05:33.960
<v Speaker 1>on social media and you see everyone talking about how

0:05:34.160 --> 0:05:37.039
<v Speaker 1>the height is the most important thing, the back balance

0:05:37.120 --> 0:05:39.000
<v Speaker 1>is the most important thing, which we'll get to in

0:05:39.040 --> 0:05:42.000
<v Speaker 1>a second. We're talking about who's paying on the first date.

0:05:42.320 --> 0:05:47.840
<v Speaker 1>It's really interesting what cultural conversations spiral online versus what

0:05:47.920 --> 0:05:50.880
<v Speaker 1>we say in a questionnaire, and I feel like there's

0:05:50.920 --> 0:05:53.880
<v Speaker 1>a disconnect there. I think what's really interesting to me

0:05:54.000 --> 0:05:56.679
<v Speaker 1>is you could go down this list and have someone

0:05:56.720 --> 0:05:59.960
<v Speaker 1>take a lot of it and then find them. Not

0:06:00.240 --> 0:06:02.960
<v Speaker 1>that you find them unattractive, but they don't take this

0:06:03.120 --> 0:06:10.240
<v Speaker 1>really artificial box like someone's height doesn't define the quality

0:06:10.400 --> 0:06:11.640
<v Speaker 1>of your relationship.

0:06:12.279 --> 0:06:13.920
<v Speaker 2>It just doesn't, right.

0:06:14.279 --> 0:06:17.080
<v Speaker 1>It's almost like saying I will drink a bottle of

0:06:17.120 --> 0:06:21.520
<v Speaker 1>water because it's taller than the other bottle, but they

0:06:21.520 --> 0:06:23.880
<v Speaker 1>both have the same amount of water in it. If

0:06:23.880 --> 0:06:26.159
<v Speaker 1>you have two bottles and they both have five hundred

0:06:26.200 --> 0:06:28.920
<v Speaker 1>millimeters of water in it, but one's taller, one shorter,

0:06:29.400 --> 0:06:33.400
<v Speaker 1>you choose the taller one. But it doesn't change your

0:06:33.440 --> 0:06:37.200
<v Speaker 1>experience of the water. It doesn't change your experience of drinking,

0:06:37.240 --> 0:06:40.039
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't change the quality of the water within. And

0:06:40.080 --> 0:06:43.240
<v Speaker 1>I think for so many of us who have been

0:06:43.279 --> 0:06:48.200
<v Speaker 1>burned in relationships, who constantly feel that we're going after

0:06:48.240 --> 0:06:50.279
<v Speaker 1>the wrong thing, how many of you can relate to

0:06:50.320 --> 0:06:52.560
<v Speaker 1>that where you keep saying, Jay, you know what, I

0:06:52.680 --> 0:06:55.720
<v Speaker 1>just keep picking the wrong person. I keep tripping myself up.

0:06:55.920 --> 0:06:59.440
<v Speaker 1>I know I keep making mistakes. It's because we're focusing

0:06:59.440 --> 0:07:00.799
<v Speaker 1>on the taller bottle of water.

0:07:01.920 --> 0:07:04.120
<v Speaker 2>So I want to ask you, what is your tall

0:07:04.200 --> 0:07:08.840
<v Speaker 2>bottle of water? Right? What is that trip up for you? Right?

0:07:08.920 --> 0:07:13.880
<v Speaker 1>What is that thing that keeps, like Mahamad Ali said,

0:07:13.880 --> 0:07:15.200
<v Speaker 1>the pebble in your shoe?

0:07:15.280 --> 0:07:15.480
<v Speaker 2>Right?

0:07:15.520 --> 0:07:18.560
<v Speaker 1>What is that that keeps giving you that discomfort, that

0:07:18.680 --> 0:07:21.240
<v Speaker 1>keeps tripping you up, that keeps making you make the

0:07:21.280 --> 0:07:24.440
<v Speaker 1>wrong decision because we say one thing, but then we

0:07:24.480 --> 0:07:27.800
<v Speaker 1>follow the other. I'm not saying that physical attractiveness is

0:07:27.840 --> 0:07:30.560
<v Speaker 1>not important. I think you should be attracted to your person.

0:07:31.080 --> 0:07:36.360
<v Speaker 1>But I think sometimes we create artificial, superficial, very limited

0:07:36.520 --> 0:07:43.080
<v Speaker 1>and limiting criteria that doesn't really allow us to find love.

0:07:43.440 --> 0:07:46.240
<v Speaker 1>And I think a lot of that criteria comes from

0:07:46.640 --> 0:07:49.920
<v Speaker 1>what we were trained in, conditioned to believe was attractive

0:07:50.480 --> 0:07:53.560
<v Speaker 1>when we were younger. Right when we were younger, we

0:07:53.640 --> 0:07:56.160
<v Speaker 1>saw certain things on the front cover of magazines, we

0:07:56.200 --> 0:07:59.720
<v Speaker 1>saw certain body types in movies and TV shows, we

0:07:59.760 --> 0:08:04.360
<v Speaker 1>saw certain colors of skin that were exposed to through media,

0:08:05.120 --> 0:08:09.480
<v Speaker 1>and we build up desires, We built up ideas and

0:08:09.600 --> 0:08:13.920
<v Speaker 1>visions of what a person should be. But I think

0:08:14.000 --> 0:08:19.160
<v Speaker 1>so often we're looking at criteria that doesn't impact the

0:08:19.240 --> 0:08:23.040
<v Speaker 1>quality of the experience, which is bizarre. There's so many

0:08:23.040 --> 0:08:26.960
<v Speaker 1>things in life where you would never assess it purely

0:08:27.080 --> 0:08:33.040
<v Speaker 1>based on a superficial metric that doesn't change the experience

0:08:33.880 --> 0:08:40.000
<v Speaker 1>of the product. Right now, number two of what men

0:08:40.200 --> 0:08:47.920
<v Speaker 1>most value in women, thirty percent said empathy, nurturing, kindness.

0:08:48.440 --> 0:08:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Now there's one thing I want to talk about because

0:08:51.360 --> 0:08:53.240
<v Speaker 1>I see this a lot. I see this with friends.

0:08:54.480 --> 0:08:59.560
<v Speaker 1>When a lot of men say nurturing, they often want

0:08:59.760 --> 0:09:02.800
<v Speaker 1>a mum in their partner. I'm just going to put

0:09:02.840 --> 0:09:05.160
<v Speaker 1>it out there. I had to say it because I

0:09:05.200 --> 0:09:10.320
<v Speaker 1>think so many individuals struggle with growing up, and I

0:09:10.320 --> 0:09:12.959
<v Speaker 1>think there's a lot of talk about women and daddy issues,

0:09:13.000 --> 0:09:15.080
<v Speaker 1>but there's not a lot of talk about men and

0:09:15.280 --> 0:09:18.840
<v Speaker 1>mummy issues. And it's this idea of I want someone

0:09:18.880 --> 0:09:23.440
<v Speaker 1>who is nurturing, but in a very maternal way, like

0:09:23.480 --> 0:09:25.160
<v Speaker 1>I want them to take care of me. I want

0:09:25.200 --> 0:09:26.679
<v Speaker 1>them to take care of the house. I want them

0:09:26.679 --> 0:09:28.439
<v Speaker 1>to do what my mom did. I want them to cook.

0:09:28.679 --> 0:09:31.360
<v Speaker 1>I want them to And it's not just the gender roles,

0:09:31.400 --> 0:09:34.600
<v Speaker 1>but there's this false expectation. And I think what's really

0:09:34.600 --> 0:09:38.760
<v Speaker 1>interesting about that is a lot of people being naturally nurturing,

0:09:38.960 --> 0:09:42.240
<v Speaker 1>naturally empathetic, naturally kind kind of see it as beautiful

0:09:42.320 --> 0:09:44.040
<v Speaker 1>because it's a way of being needed, it's a way

0:09:44.040 --> 0:09:45.080
<v Speaker 1>of being wanted, it's.

0:09:44.960 --> 0:09:46.800
<v Speaker 2>A way of being useful.

0:09:47.720 --> 0:09:49.320
<v Speaker 1>But I think we have to really look at that

0:09:49.480 --> 0:09:53.280
<v Speaker 1>in what we desire and what the other person is

0:09:53.480 --> 0:09:57.160
<v Speaker 1>willing to deliver on. And again I go back to it,

0:09:57.559 --> 0:10:01.920
<v Speaker 1>do we want a partner who's equal, excited and curious

0:10:02.520 --> 0:10:04.400
<v Speaker 1>or are we really looking for someone to take care

0:10:04.400 --> 0:10:06.360
<v Speaker 1>of us? Because if we're looking for someone to take

0:10:06.400 --> 0:10:09.000
<v Speaker 1>care of us, it ends up leading to the relationship

0:10:09.000 --> 0:10:11.720
<v Speaker 1>we don't want. We then say, oh, well they're not adventurous,

0:10:12.280 --> 0:10:15.360
<v Speaker 1>or well they're not interesting, or they're not passionate, and

0:10:15.400 --> 0:10:19.240
<v Speaker 1>it's like, well, yeah, because they're mothering or fathering you. Right,

0:10:19.320 --> 0:10:23.679
<v Speaker 1>if your partner is now your parent you're not going

0:10:23.720 --> 0:10:25.920
<v Speaker 1>to find them attractive. After a while, you're not going

0:10:25.960 --> 0:10:28.199
<v Speaker 1>to find them interesting. After a while, you're going to

0:10:28.240 --> 0:10:31.680
<v Speaker 1>find that they're annoying you, that they're on your case,

0:10:31.800 --> 0:10:35.040
<v Speaker 1>that they're holding you accountable. All the things that you

0:10:35.559 --> 0:10:39.440
<v Speaker 1>potentially are challenged by or resenting your parents, you now

0:10:39.480 --> 0:10:42.480
<v Speaker 1>project that onto your partner. So when we say things

0:10:42.520 --> 0:10:46.440
<v Speaker 1>like I want someone to be empathetic, nurturing, kind, let's

0:10:46.440 --> 0:10:49.600
<v Speaker 1>really look at what we mean by that. And I

0:10:49.679 --> 0:10:53.360
<v Speaker 1>actually think here's the thing. We say we want those things,

0:10:53.840 --> 0:10:57.199
<v Speaker 1>but when we experience in reality, a lot of people say, oh,

0:10:57.240 --> 0:11:02.439
<v Speaker 1>they're so kind, they're so sweet, boring, right, and then

0:11:02.480 --> 0:11:05.800
<v Speaker 1>the other person who's not kind and sweet, they're exhilarating.

0:11:06.160 --> 0:11:09.000
<v Speaker 1>It's a really weird contrast in how we say we

0:11:09.040 --> 0:11:12.440
<v Speaker 1>want someone who's kind, we want someone who's thoughtful, but

0:11:12.480 --> 0:11:14.880
<v Speaker 1>then when we experience them in reality, it's not fun.

0:11:14.920 --> 0:11:18.160
<v Speaker 1>There's no chemistry, there's no spark, right, and then we

0:11:18.240 --> 0:11:21.520
<v Speaker 1>often go for the person who's not kind, not nurturing,

0:11:21.640 --> 0:11:26.920
<v Speaker 1>not empathetic. What I'm getting at here is we know

0:11:27.200 --> 0:11:30.719
<v Speaker 1>we want people of high character and high value. We

0:11:30.760 --> 0:11:34.000
<v Speaker 1>want someone who has deep values. We want someone who

0:11:34.080 --> 0:11:40.480
<v Speaker 1>has values like honesty, kindness, morality, nurturing, both in men

0:11:40.520 --> 0:11:43.800
<v Speaker 1>and women. We've seen honesty and morality top one for women,

0:11:43.840 --> 0:11:47.800
<v Speaker 1>wanting in men, and empathy nurturing kindness number two in women.

0:11:48.040 --> 0:11:49.000
<v Speaker 2>You've got all these.

0:11:48.880 --> 0:11:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Deep values that are right up then in what we want,

0:11:53.240 --> 0:11:57.240
<v Speaker 1>but we're so easily shifted away from our values. So

0:11:57.280 --> 0:11:59.280
<v Speaker 1>you ask me, Jay, why is that? Why is it

0:11:59.320 --> 0:12:01.560
<v Speaker 1>that I know what it's good for me, but I

0:12:01.679 --> 0:12:04.760
<v Speaker 1>choose what's bad for me? How many of you can

0:12:04.800 --> 0:12:07.160
<v Speaker 1>relate to that? Gee, I know what's right for me,

0:12:07.760 --> 0:12:09.880
<v Speaker 1>but why do I always choose what's wrong for me?

0:12:10.840 --> 0:12:14.000
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting, isn't It's a trick of the mind. The

0:12:14.120 --> 0:12:19.040
<v Speaker 1>mind has the ability to trick you. You know what's good

0:12:19.120 --> 0:12:24.760
<v Speaker 1>for you, but you'll still choose what's bad for you. You

0:12:24.040 --> 0:12:27.760
<v Speaker 1>know what's right for you, but you will choose what's

0:12:27.800 --> 0:12:35.400
<v Speaker 1>wrong for you. This happens because we become clouded. Our

0:12:35.480 --> 0:12:41.080
<v Speaker 1>vision becomes blurred, and ultimately love is blind. We get

0:12:41.120 --> 0:12:46.640
<v Speaker 1>blinded by the chemicals of the spark and of attraction

0:12:47.280 --> 0:12:52.520
<v Speaker 1>and of lust that literally blur our vision so that

0:12:52.600 --> 0:12:57.719
<v Speaker 1>we now no longer see the unfavorable elements of that individual.

0:12:58.440 --> 0:13:02.080
<v Speaker 1>This is true for the chemicals released during and after sex.

0:13:02.800 --> 0:13:05.280
<v Speaker 1>This is true for when we first feel that chemical

0:13:05.320 --> 0:13:13.960
<v Speaker 1>attraction to someone, we're actually emotionally vision impaired to notice

0:13:14.000 --> 0:13:19.560
<v Speaker 1>the things about someone that actually matter. And I've partnered

0:13:19.640 --> 0:13:22.319
<v Speaker 1>up with Match, which I'm really excited about as their

0:13:22.360 --> 0:13:27.160
<v Speaker 1>relationship advisor, because what I found is that dating apps

0:13:27.160 --> 0:13:30.920
<v Speaker 1>are not the problem the challenges of what we're focused

0:13:30.960 --> 0:13:34.479
<v Speaker 1>on and what we're looking at. If we don't understand

0:13:34.559 --> 0:13:39.480
<v Speaker 1>our values and we don't understand the other person's values

0:13:39.800 --> 0:13:43.840
<v Speaker 1>and they don't understand theirs and hours, it doesn't matter

0:13:43.920 --> 0:13:47.400
<v Speaker 1>how many other boxes we tick. If you're truly in

0:13:47.440 --> 0:13:51.880
<v Speaker 1>this for a successful relationship, if you're truly in this

0:13:52.400 --> 0:13:57.200
<v Speaker 1>for a real, deep partnership, I promise you the artificial,

0:13:57.280 --> 0:13:59.360
<v Speaker 1>superficial things are not going to be the ones that

0:13:59.400 --> 0:13:59.960
<v Speaker 1>make a difference.

0:14:00.400 --> 0:14:01.360
<v Speaker 2>Your values are.

0:14:01.440 --> 0:14:06.959
<v Speaker 1>Your knowledge, awareness, acceptance, and respect for someone's values are.

0:14:08.040 --> 0:14:10.280
<v Speaker 1>So I want you to head over to match dot com,

0:14:10.320 --> 0:14:14.120
<v Speaker 1>forward slash j if you want to match people through

0:14:14.200 --> 0:14:18.480
<v Speaker 1>value systems, through a deeper value connection. Again, I'm not

0:14:18.520 --> 0:14:20.160
<v Speaker 1>saying I want you to be attracted to the person.

0:14:20.200 --> 0:14:21.640
<v Speaker 1>I want you to think they're fun. I want you

0:14:21.680 --> 0:14:23.800
<v Speaker 1>to be excited, But I want us to pivot and

0:14:23.920 --> 0:14:30.680
<v Speaker 1>shift our mindset on for a moment, deprioritizing the things

0:14:30.720 --> 0:14:35.680
<v Speaker 1>that society, media, parents, and friends have told us to overvalue,

0:14:36.520 --> 0:14:40.800
<v Speaker 1>and shift more emphasis onto the things we've been made

0:14:40.800 --> 0:14:49.560
<v Speaker 1>to undervalue, like honesty, kindness, connection, empathy, these deep values

0:14:49.680 --> 0:14:54.960
<v Speaker 1>that are so critical to the success of a relationship. Right,

0:14:55.800 --> 0:14:58.760
<v Speaker 1>And we do this with everything right, There'll be debates

0:14:58.840 --> 0:15:03.960
<v Speaker 1>constantly between iPhone and Android users, people saying like, oh, well,

0:15:04.440 --> 0:15:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Android is more customizable, iPhones more the slickness, and again

0:15:08.400 --> 0:15:12.320
<v Speaker 1>we follow brand and it's true, right, like Android does

0:15:12.440 --> 0:15:15.960
<v Speaker 1>have and Samsung phones do have more functionality, but we

0:15:16.080 --> 0:15:20.400
<v Speaker 1>choose something that we think has a certain brand or whatever.

0:15:20.120 --> 0:15:20.520
<v Speaker 2>It may be.

0:15:21.600 --> 0:15:24.440
<v Speaker 1>And it's interesting how when you start doing that in love,

0:15:25.400 --> 0:15:28.840
<v Speaker 1>it has far bigger ramifications than with technology.

0:15:29.480 --> 0:15:29.720
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:15:30.760 --> 0:15:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Number two of what women want in men, twenty three

0:15:34.040 --> 0:15:38.560
<v Speaker 1>percent said professional financial success. And I want to call

0:15:38.600 --> 0:15:42.160
<v Speaker 1>out this has caused a lot of stress and pressure

0:15:42.800 --> 0:15:45.360
<v Speaker 1>for a lot of friends, a lot of good men,

0:15:46.320 --> 0:15:50.040
<v Speaker 1>because I think we're again living in a society where

0:15:50.920 --> 0:15:56.400
<v Speaker 1>people are exposed to a world online of fast cars, jewelry.

0:15:56.720 --> 0:16:00.240
<v Speaker 1>You've got their high flying life and it can become

0:16:00.360 --> 0:16:05.200
<v Speaker 1>quite intimidating and quite challenging for people to think they

0:16:05.200 --> 0:16:07.600
<v Speaker 1>have to live up to that. And I know a

0:16:07.640 --> 0:16:11.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of good, hard working, honest men that are trying

0:16:11.520 --> 0:16:14.320
<v Speaker 1>their best, that are passionate about what they do, that

0:16:14.400 --> 0:16:18.480
<v Speaker 1>care about what they do, but they're being undervalued. And

0:16:19.040 --> 0:16:22.120
<v Speaker 1>I always like sharing this because to me, it makes

0:16:22.120 --> 0:16:26.320
<v Speaker 1>a huge difference. When I met Rady, materially, I didn't

0:16:26.360 --> 0:16:30.440
<v Speaker 1>have anything, and Raddi chose to be with me at

0:16:30.480 --> 0:16:33.280
<v Speaker 1>a time when I was still trying to pay off

0:16:33.320 --> 0:16:37.000
<v Speaker 1>my student debt and I didn't even have a job,

0:16:37.880 --> 0:16:43.080
<v Speaker 1>and I don't even thought she knew if I would

0:16:43.120 --> 0:16:47.600
<v Speaker 1>ever get anywhere externally to a certain level. But I

0:16:47.640 --> 0:16:50.280
<v Speaker 1>think the point was I had someone who believed in

0:16:50.320 --> 0:16:55.960
<v Speaker 1>me and saw that I wanted to grow. And I

0:16:56.000 --> 0:16:58.760
<v Speaker 1>think I want to point that out here. Which comes

0:16:58.800 --> 0:17:02.160
<v Speaker 1>third for women, which is nineteen percent ambition and leadership

0:17:02.280 --> 0:17:08.280
<v Speaker 1>women wanting in men, is that I truly believe that

0:17:09.320 --> 0:17:14.960
<v Speaker 1>ambition is something that is better to look for than

0:17:15.480 --> 0:17:19.320
<v Speaker 1>already achieved financial success. Someone who already has financial success

0:17:19.560 --> 0:17:21.480
<v Speaker 1>may want to pivot, They may even want to quit

0:17:21.520 --> 0:17:24.240
<v Speaker 1>their job to try something. By the way, someone else

0:17:24.240 --> 0:17:27.200
<v Speaker 1>who hasn't made it, Especially when you met someone young.

0:17:28.080 --> 0:17:29.119
<v Speaker 2>They need to have time.

0:17:29.960 --> 0:17:34.240
<v Speaker 1>And if that person feels pressure rather than believe, chances

0:17:34.240 --> 0:17:36.760
<v Speaker 1>are they'll buckle. Now, the other thing I'd like to

0:17:36.800 --> 0:17:38.720
<v Speaker 1>point out is whether you're a man or woman. These

0:17:38.720 --> 0:17:41.399
<v Speaker 1>are all themes that I think are across the board

0:17:42.240 --> 0:17:45.600
<v Speaker 1>for me. If you're looking for someone who's ambitious, you've

0:17:45.640 --> 0:17:48.800
<v Speaker 1>also got to understand from a value point of view,

0:17:48.880 --> 0:17:51.800
<v Speaker 1>what that trade is. So if you want someone ambitious,

0:17:51.920 --> 0:17:54.399
<v Speaker 1>chances are they won't be available all the time.

0:17:55.119 --> 0:17:55.280
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:17:55.320 --> 0:17:59.320
<v Speaker 1>You can't have someone ambitious and available. It doesn't work

0:17:59.359 --> 0:18:02.480
<v Speaker 1>that way. And I think a lot of us will

0:18:02.880 --> 0:18:04.880
<v Speaker 1>want someone who's ambitious, but then we'll say why they're

0:18:04.880 --> 0:18:09.480
<v Speaker 1>not available? Right, We'll say we want someone who's successful.

0:18:09.960 --> 0:18:12.639
<v Speaker 1>But then we're saying, well, why are they not, why

0:18:12.720 --> 0:18:16.040
<v Speaker 1>they're not messaging me, why they're not available this weekend,

0:18:16.040 --> 0:18:17.840
<v Speaker 1>why they're not up for hanging out, And it's like, well,

0:18:17.840 --> 0:18:21.320
<v Speaker 1>they're not living spontaneous, they're living structured. So we always

0:18:21.400 --> 0:18:24.200
<v Speaker 1>have to understand the value that we want in someone.

0:18:24.600 --> 0:18:27.520
<v Speaker 1>How does that value show up in reality. I think

0:18:27.560 --> 0:18:31.960
<v Speaker 1>we almost have these very one dimensional views of values, right,

0:18:31.960 --> 0:18:34.160
<v Speaker 1>Our one dimensional view of ambition is our someone who

0:18:34.200 --> 0:18:37.000
<v Speaker 1>has goals, someone who has dreams, but then we want

0:18:37.000 --> 0:18:38.720
<v Speaker 1>them to have dreams. But then we want them to

0:18:38.760 --> 0:18:40.600
<v Speaker 1>never work on their dreams because we want them to

0:18:40.640 --> 0:18:43.840
<v Speaker 1>be around. Right. It doesn't add up, and I think

0:18:43.880 --> 0:18:46.639
<v Speaker 1>we can have these very limited and limiting views of

0:18:46.680 --> 0:18:51.720
<v Speaker 1>what a true goal looks like. Now, the third thing

0:18:51.800 --> 0:18:55.440
<v Speaker 1>that men look for a woman, twenty two percent said intelligence.

0:18:56.200 --> 0:18:59.040
<v Speaker 1>And again, by the way, I am calling out all

0:18:59.080 --> 0:19:01.600
<v Speaker 1>sides of it because it's so interesting to me. I

0:19:01.600 --> 0:19:04.520
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of incredibly successful female friends who are

0:19:04.560 --> 0:19:09.959
<v Speaker 1>doing amazing entrepreneurs, building incredible companies, doing phenomenal stuff, and

0:19:10.040 --> 0:19:14.520
<v Speaker 1>they actually feel like their intelligence is intimidating. They feel

0:19:14.520 --> 0:19:18.320
<v Speaker 1>like their ambition is intimidating, and a lot of them

0:19:18.359 --> 0:19:22.480
<v Speaker 1>feel like they have to kind of lower themselves or

0:19:22.520 --> 0:19:28.520
<v Speaker 1>lower their standards, or make themselves feel less smart, less thoughtful, less,

0:19:29.119 --> 0:19:33.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, less accomplished in order to attract someone. Let

0:19:33.480 --> 0:19:36.800
<v Speaker 1>me say this, your partner who cares about you, who

0:19:36.920 --> 0:19:40.800
<v Speaker 1>values you, will admire your success. Now. I think there's

0:19:40.800 --> 0:19:46.080
<v Speaker 1>a difference also between admiring and being a fan, and

0:19:46.440 --> 0:19:50.919
<v Speaker 1>I think admiration is healthier than fandom. I think if

0:19:51.000 --> 0:19:54.000
<v Speaker 1>someone's a big fan of yours. It's hard to be

0:19:54.040 --> 0:19:56.480
<v Speaker 1>a partner, and sometimes we say, oh, my partner's my

0:19:56.560 --> 0:19:58.240
<v Speaker 1>number one fan. I want to be their number fan.

0:19:58.280 --> 0:19:59.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, to be honest, I'd probably even say I'm

0:19:59.840 --> 0:20:04.040
<v Speaker 1>rather number one fan. And maybe I should take back

0:20:04.080 --> 0:20:05.720
<v Speaker 1>my statement now because I'm like, yeah, I am a

0:20:05.760 --> 0:20:07.960
<v Speaker 1>rather these number one fan. What am I talking about?

0:20:07.760 --> 0:20:11.080
<v Speaker 1>But I think the idea that there's an admiration for

0:20:11.160 --> 0:20:14.840
<v Speaker 1>what you do and there's a respect for what you do,

0:20:14.920 --> 0:20:17.000
<v Speaker 1>but you have to have that back for them whatever

0:20:17.040 --> 0:20:19.160
<v Speaker 1>they decide to be or whatever they decide to do.

0:20:20.000 --> 0:20:23.440
<v Speaker 1>And so if you are someone who feels like your

0:20:23.520 --> 0:20:28.280
<v Speaker 1>success intimidates people, or your success, you know, makes people

0:20:28.280 --> 0:20:33.560
<v Speaker 1>feel uncomfortable, chances are you're just speaking to the wrong

0:20:33.600 --> 0:20:36.920
<v Speaker 1>people because you shouldn't have to play down your success.

0:20:37.000 --> 0:20:42.440
<v Speaker 1>I know someone who constantly started to play down their

0:20:42.480 --> 0:20:44.720
<v Speaker 1>success whenever they were around someone to date them. They

0:20:44.720 --> 0:20:47.520
<v Speaker 1>complained about their life, they did all those things, and

0:20:47.560 --> 0:20:49.800
<v Speaker 1>then someone left them because they said they were too negative.

0:20:50.240 --> 0:20:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Now this person wasn't negative at all. So just imagine

0:20:53.800 --> 0:20:59.040
<v Speaker 1>that for a second. You're a positive, high functioning, high performer. Then,

0:20:59.280 --> 0:21:03.320
<v Speaker 1>in order to make yourself more relatable. You start talking

0:21:03.320 --> 0:21:08.160
<v Speaker 1>about your bad experiences and what's going wrong, and then

0:21:08.200 --> 0:21:12.399
<v Speaker 1>that person leaves you, not because you're intimidating, but because

0:21:12.400 --> 0:21:17.199
<v Speaker 1>they see you as uninteresting and complaining and negative. And

0:21:17.280 --> 0:21:21.760
<v Speaker 1>so I think you don't want to become someone you're not.

0:21:22.560 --> 0:21:26.160
<v Speaker 1>And there's this beautiful quote that I read from Arlin

0:21:26.480 --> 0:21:29.560
<v Speaker 1>was here the other day on Twitter, and it said

0:21:30.000 --> 0:21:34.120
<v Speaker 1>be yourself so that the people looking for you can

0:21:34.240 --> 0:21:39.840
<v Speaker 1>find you. And I think that's what that patience needs

0:21:39.880 --> 0:21:44.160
<v Speaker 1>to be. That I don't have to make myself smaller

0:21:45.320 --> 0:21:48.640
<v Speaker 1>in order to have a big experience of love.

0:21:48.760 --> 0:21:49.560
<v Speaker 2>I don't have.

0:21:49.520 --> 0:21:54.800
<v Speaker 1>To make myself less significant in order to find a

0:21:54.840 --> 0:21:58.720
<v Speaker 1>significant other. Let me say that again, you don't have

0:21:58.920 --> 0:22:04.160
<v Speaker 1>to make yourself less significant to find a significant other

0:22:05.080 --> 0:22:11.120
<v Speaker 1>because a significant other will recognize your significance and celebrate it.

0:22:11.600 --> 0:22:13.000
<v Speaker 2>Now, I want to go down this list.

0:22:12.760 --> 0:22:14.760
<v Speaker 1>For you so you know. So what women value most

0:22:14.800 --> 0:22:19.560
<v Speaker 1>in men? Nineteen percent said strength and toughness, eighteen percent

0:22:19.640 --> 0:22:24.480
<v Speaker 1>said hard work, good work ethic, eleven percent said physical attractiveness,

0:22:24.800 --> 0:22:30.560
<v Speaker 1>eleven percent said empathy, nurturing kindness, nine percent said loyalty, dependability,

0:22:31.119 --> 0:22:34.960
<v Speaker 1>eight percent said intelligence, five percent said being family oriented,

0:22:35.240 --> 0:22:40.760
<v Speaker 1>and five percent said politeness respectfulness. Notice how a relationship

0:22:40.800 --> 0:22:47.800
<v Speaker 1>is made up of loyalty, politeness, respectfulness, but those only

0:22:47.920 --> 0:22:56.119
<v Speaker 1>make up fourteen percent of respondents fourteen percent, versus strength

0:22:56.160 --> 0:22:59.760
<v Speaker 1>and toughness at nineteen percent. And by the way, I

0:22:59.760 --> 0:23:01.560
<v Speaker 1>think we all look at people like, how can how

0:23:01.560 --> 0:23:04.080
<v Speaker 1>can you think that? But but well, this trick is

0:23:04.119 --> 0:23:06.440
<v Speaker 1>played on all of us. We all fall for it.

0:23:06.960 --> 0:23:08.680
<v Speaker 1>And so I want us to be really careful when

0:23:08.680 --> 0:23:13.200
<v Speaker 1>you're next meeting someone. Don't write them off because they're

0:23:13.240 --> 0:23:16.760
<v Speaker 1>boring and they're polite and respectful. Because there's a part

0:23:16.800 --> 0:23:21.840
<v Speaker 1>of us that gets excitement, and it's the tension and

0:23:21.880 --> 0:23:25.880
<v Speaker 1>the stress that feels positive in the beginning when you're

0:23:25.920 --> 0:23:29.080
<v Speaker 1>playing guessing games and you're checking in, and I've talked

0:23:29.080 --> 0:23:33.400
<v Speaker 1>about this example before, this idea of this stress and excitement.

0:23:34.040 --> 0:23:37.239
<v Speaker 1>When someone's playing hard to get there's the excitement of

0:23:37.359 --> 0:23:40.000
<v Speaker 1>I got their number. The stress is what should I

0:23:40.080 --> 0:23:44.120
<v Speaker 1>message them? The excitement is, oh, I just messaged them.

0:23:44.160 --> 0:23:47.200
<v Speaker 1>The stress is when will they message back? The excitement

0:23:47.320 --> 0:23:49.640
<v Speaker 1>is I'm so excited we're going out on a date.

0:23:49.680 --> 0:23:52.000
<v Speaker 1>The stress is all they were hot and cold, and

0:23:52.040 --> 0:23:56.320
<v Speaker 1>that creates positive tension in the beginning, but really it's

0:23:56.400 --> 0:24:00.199
<v Speaker 1>not what we're looking for. It's exhausting. And what this

0:24:00.280 --> 0:24:04.479
<v Speaker 1>study says men are looking for in women, nine percent

0:24:04.520 --> 0:24:08.960
<v Speaker 1>said hard work, eight percent said professional financial success, seven

0:24:09.000 --> 0:24:13.400
<v Speaker 1>percent of loyalty dependent ability, seven percent of competence, ability,

0:24:14.000 --> 0:24:17.760
<v Speaker 1>six percent sat independence and self reliance, five percent of

0:24:17.840 --> 0:24:22.639
<v Speaker 1>strength and toughness, five percent of politeness, respectfulness, and five

0:24:22.720 --> 0:24:27.040
<v Speaker 1>percent said ability to multitask. What I'm realizing is we're

0:24:27.080 --> 0:24:31.080
<v Speaker 1>looking for love in all the wrong places. And usually

0:24:31.080 --> 0:24:33.480
<v Speaker 1>we think of wrong places as oh, am I in

0:24:33.520 --> 0:24:35.800
<v Speaker 1>the right bar Am I in the right restaurant? Am

0:24:35.840 --> 0:24:38.720
<v Speaker 1>I on the right app right? That kind of thing.

0:24:39.119 --> 0:24:40.800
<v Speaker 1>And what I'm saying is, actually we're looking for it

0:24:40.800 --> 0:24:44.119
<v Speaker 1>in the wrong places because we're looking at criteria that

0:24:44.280 --> 0:24:49.080
<v Speaker 1>doesn't define the quality of a relationship right. For example,

0:24:49.160 --> 0:24:53.080
<v Speaker 1>if you want to know whether a movie is good

0:24:53.160 --> 0:24:57.600
<v Speaker 1>or not, you look on Rotten Tomatoes or IMDb. If

0:24:57.640 --> 0:25:00.480
<v Speaker 1>you want to know whether a car insurance so something

0:25:00.520 --> 0:25:03.040
<v Speaker 1>is good, you'll ask a friend or family member what

0:25:03.160 --> 0:25:07.840
<v Speaker 1>they use. You go to the specific criteria to measure something,

0:25:09.040 --> 0:25:10.879
<v Speaker 1>but you wouldn't say, oh, I want to know if

0:25:10.920 --> 0:25:14.000
<v Speaker 1>a movie is good, I'm going to look at.

0:25:13.800 --> 0:25:17.280
<v Speaker 2>The height of the actors and the cast. Right.

0:25:17.400 --> 0:25:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Literally, you wouldn't do that because it doesn't impact the

0:25:20.680 --> 0:25:23.639
<v Speaker 1>quality of the movie. That is literally how ridiculous it

0:25:23.720 --> 0:25:25.960
<v Speaker 1>is to say, I'm going to look at this person's height. Now,

0:25:26.000 --> 0:25:27.960
<v Speaker 1>I keep picking on the hight thing because it was

0:25:28.000 --> 0:25:30.080
<v Speaker 1>big on that episode of Love Island yesterday.

0:25:30.520 --> 0:25:32.119
<v Speaker 2>But and I'm not mad at that. I'm not.

0:25:32.200 --> 0:25:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Again, like, I get it, we're attracted to certain things.

0:25:35.760 --> 0:25:39.040
<v Speaker 1>But I want you to really understand the correlation between

0:25:39.080 --> 0:25:42.480
<v Speaker 1>what you're attracted to in a healthy relationship, Like that

0:25:42.640 --> 0:25:47.040
<v Speaker 1>element that criteria is not going to change the quality

0:25:47.200 --> 0:25:51.480
<v Speaker 1>of your relationship. It's not going to change the experience

0:25:52.200 --> 0:25:53.440
<v Speaker 1>of your relationship.

0:25:54.240 --> 0:25:55.920
<v Speaker 2>Now, I really want you to go.

0:25:55.880 --> 0:25:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Check out match dot com, forward slash Ja to understand

0:26:00.040 --> 0:26:02.320
<v Speaker 1>and your values, select your values, and be matched with

0:26:02.400 --> 0:26:07.679
<v Speaker 1>people based on your values, because I think that, like

0:26:07.760 --> 0:26:11.480
<v Speaker 1>I said, so many of us forget our values very quickly.

0:26:11.480 --> 0:26:15.000
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's because they've been talked about in

0:26:15.040 --> 0:26:18.000
<v Speaker 1>this very theoretical way. It's kind of like an idea

0:26:18.119 --> 0:26:21.040
<v Speaker 1>that we have. We've never seen them. We don't put

0:26:21.040 --> 0:26:24.359
<v Speaker 1>them at the center of connection. We kind of put

0:26:24.560 --> 0:26:27.639
<v Speaker 1>all the other stuff of like personality and attractiveness above

0:26:27.680 --> 0:26:32.119
<v Speaker 1>it when values are truly what it's about in a

0:26:32.160 --> 0:26:35.000
<v Speaker 1>long term relationship. And so I would love for you

0:26:35.080 --> 0:26:38.680
<v Speaker 1>to go and become more familiarized with values. I'd love

0:26:38.680 --> 0:26:40.960
<v Speaker 1>for you to check out my book Eight Rules of Love,

0:26:41.480 --> 0:26:46.040
<v Speaker 1>which focuses deeply on understanding someone values and them understanding

0:26:46.119 --> 0:26:49.639
<v Speaker 1>yours as being the core and central part of a

0:26:49.680 --> 0:26:53.200
<v Speaker 1>healthy relationship. And I want to thank you all again

0:26:53.280 --> 0:26:55.119
<v Speaker 1>for listening today, for connecting here.

0:26:55.840 --> 0:26:57.480
<v Speaker 2>I really hope this episode helps you.

0:26:57.520 --> 0:27:00.320
<v Speaker 1>I hope it serves and supports you, and I can't

0:27:00.359 --> 0:27:03.360
<v Speaker 1>wait for you to listen to more episodes and on purpose,

0:27:03.680 --> 0:27:05.399
<v Speaker 1>share this with a friend, pass it along.

0:27:05.800 --> 0:27:08.800
<v Speaker 2>Thank you so much for listening. I'm always in your

0:27:08.800 --> 0:27:10.919
<v Speaker 2>corner and I'm forever rooting for you.

0:27:11.520 --> 0:27:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Hey, everyone, if you love that conversation, go and check

0:27:15.040 --> 0:27:19.000
<v Speaker 1>out my episode with the world's leading therapist Lourie Gottlieb,

0:27:19.240 --> 0:27:22.639
<v Speaker 1>where she answers the biggest questions that people ask in

0:27:22.760 --> 0:27:27.399
<v Speaker 1>therapy when it comes to love, relationships, heartbreak, and dating.

0:27:27.800 --> 0:27:30.119
<v Speaker 1>If you're trying to figure out that space right now,

0:27:30.400 --> 0:27:32.399
<v Speaker 1>you won't want to miss this conversation.

0:27:32.800 --> 0:27:37.160
<v Speaker 2>If it's a romantic relationship, hold hands. It's really hard

0:27:37.160 --> 0:27:40.760
<v Speaker 2>to argue it actually calms your nervous systems. Just hold

0:27:40.840 --> 0:27:42.480
<v Speaker 2>hands as you're having the conversation.

0:27:42.600 --> 0:27:43.560
<v Speaker 1>It's so lovely.