WEBVTT - Water on Mars

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Brought to you by Toyota. Let's go places. Welcome to

0:00:07.360 --> 0:00:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Forward Thinking. He there. Forward Thinking is back. Don't call

0:00:14.160 --> 0:00:18.079
<v Speaker 1>it a comeback. We've been here for years. I'm Jonathan

0:00:18.079 --> 0:00:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Strickland and I'm Joe McCormick, and we wanted to announce

0:00:22.040 --> 0:00:27.720
<v Speaker 1>that the podcast is back and thank thank you people

0:00:27.800 --> 0:00:32.800
<v Speaker 1>for your support. We received numerous emails, tweets, Facebook messages,

0:00:32.840 --> 0:00:34.680
<v Speaker 1>pretty much anyway you guys could get in touch with us.

0:00:34.720 --> 0:00:37.440
<v Speaker 1>I think we saw smoke signals one day asking where

0:00:37.440 --> 0:00:40.000
<v Speaker 1>the heck is the podcast? Where's the video series? So

0:00:40.159 --> 0:00:44.000
<v Speaker 1>quick update. We do Forward Thinking in seasons and season

0:00:44.040 --> 0:00:46.800
<v Speaker 1>three had just come to an end in October two

0:00:46.800 --> 0:00:50.360
<v Speaker 1>thousand fifteen, and then there was discussion about whether or

0:00:50.360 --> 0:00:52.880
<v Speaker 1>not season four would happen, and that discussion happened well

0:00:52.920 --> 0:00:56.400
<v Speaker 1>above our heads. We all wanted to do it. Lots

0:00:56.400 --> 0:00:57.840
<v Speaker 1>of people wanted to do it. In fact, at the

0:00:57.880 --> 0:00:59.920
<v Speaker 1>end of the day, everyone said they wanted to do it.

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:02.160
<v Speaker 1>So we're not sure exactly what the hold up is,

0:01:02.200 --> 0:01:04.679
<v Speaker 1>but it's all solved now. So now that we're back,

0:01:04.760 --> 0:01:07.440
<v Speaker 1>we have a couple of podcasts that we actually recorded

0:01:07.520 --> 0:01:10.399
<v Speaker 1>before we went on hiatus and kind of sat around

0:01:10.440 --> 0:01:13.199
<v Speaker 1>in our vault and we want to release the first

0:01:13.240 --> 0:01:18.480
<v Speaker 1>of those today. It's all about water on Mars. Yeah,

0:01:18.600 --> 0:01:21.280
<v Speaker 1>so this was recorded in was it early October? Very

0:01:21.280 --> 0:01:23.679
<v Speaker 1>early October? This was recorded several months ago, And that's

0:01:23.680 --> 0:01:26.080
<v Speaker 1>why you might hear us referring to things being in

0:01:26.120 --> 0:01:28.440
<v Speaker 1>the news that are not currently in the news, but

0:01:28.520 --> 0:01:31.000
<v Speaker 1>we're in the news at the time this was recorded,

0:01:31.240 --> 0:01:34.440
<v Speaker 1>for example, water on Mars. But I hope you will

0:01:34.520 --> 0:01:36.760
<v Speaker 1>enjoy the episode anyway, because I do think it is

0:01:36.880 --> 0:01:39.960
<v Speaker 1>very interesting, and we hope you will stay tuned for

0:01:40.040 --> 0:01:42.800
<v Speaker 1>new episodes that we're going to start recording very soon.

0:01:43.160 --> 0:01:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Right one more in the can, and then after that

0:01:46.240 --> 0:01:49.240
<v Speaker 1>it's all new territory. We have no idea where we're going,

0:01:49.320 --> 0:01:51.120
<v Speaker 1>no more than you do. And we don't even know

0:01:51.200 --> 0:01:53.760
<v Speaker 1>when we're recording yet because it's been so long since

0:01:53.760 --> 0:01:56.360
<v Speaker 1>we've all three sat down at this table. Guys, it's

0:01:56.400 --> 0:01:58.360
<v Speaker 1>been months since the three of us have been at

0:01:58.400 --> 0:02:03.080
<v Speaker 1>this table together. I'm kind of I'm kind of reclemped. Yeah,

0:02:03.120 --> 0:02:05.720
<v Speaker 1>it's a little it's a little overwhelming. It's a little

0:02:05.720 --> 0:02:07.560
<v Speaker 1>overwhelming for some of us more than others, because we

0:02:07.680 --> 0:02:11.200
<v Speaker 1>some of us have a podcast to record immediately after this. Sorry, Joe,

0:02:11.240 --> 0:02:13.520
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna wrap this up, so let's get right into

0:02:13.639 --> 0:02:17.760
<v Speaker 1>the water on Mars episode. And guys were so happy

0:02:17.840 --> 0:02:20.000
<v Speaker 1>that we're back. Can't wait to talk to you about

0:02:20.040 --> 0:02:25.560
<v Speaker 1>the future more really soon. Hey there, and welcome to

0:02:25.760 --> 0:02:29.080
<v Speaker 1>Forward Thinking, the podcast that looks at the future and says,

0:02:29.240 --> 0:02:33.720
<v Speaker 1>letting the days go by water flowing underground. I'm Jonathan Strickland.

0:02:33.720 --> 0:02:37.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm Joe McCormick. Jonathan. I don't know if you noticed,

0:02:37.840 --> 0:02:42.040
<v Speaker 1>but right before this podcast I was quoting, uh, talking heads.

0:02:42.120 --> 0:02:44.760
<v Speaker 1>I did not notice. You were talking about the social

0:02:44.760 --> 0:02:48.160
<v Speaker 1>media platform Tumbler, which I cannot think of without thinking of, well,

0:02:48.200 --> 0:02:53.959
<v Speaker 1>I'm a tumbler. Nice. Yeah, As it turns out, I

0:02:54.120 --> 0:02:57.880
<v Speaker 1>had selected that one mirror moments before you and Lauren

0:02:57.960 --> 0:03:01.160
<v Speaker 1>came into the studio, so there was no collusion there.

0:03:01.160 --> 0:03:03.600
<v Speaker 1>It's I try to make these a surprise for everyone

0:03:03.639 --> 0:03:06.960
<v Speaker 1>in the room besides myself. I mean sometimes I'm surprised too,

0:03:07.000 --> 0:03:10.720
<v Speaker 1>if at any rate, Hey, let's talk about some water

0:03:10.800 --> 0:03:13.160
<v Speaker 1>on Mars, y'all. Yeah, well that was that was a

0:03:13.200 --> 0:03:15.880
<v Speaker 1>big headline a week ago. Yeah, when I was when

0:03:15.919 --> 0:03:18.720
<v Speaker 1>I was on vacation, and you guys were holding down

0:03:18.800 --> 0:03:23.320
<v Speaker 1>the fort um. I noticed, I, guys, I was in

0:03:23.400 --> 0:03:27.440
<v Speaker 1>a place where I think the internet got their last Tuesday.

0:03:27.520 --> 0:03:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I was in a place where it just information

0:03:31.400 --> 0:03:35.080
<v Speaker 1>just doesn't get there as quickly as everywhere else. So

0:03:35.440 --> 0:03:37.440
<v Speaker 1>I knew that there was going to be an announcement

0:03:37.880 --> 0:03:40.960
<v Speaker 1>that that NASA had something to announce that had something

0:03:41.000 --> 0:03:43.960
<v Speaker 1>to do with Mars. I was convinced they had found

0:03:43.960 --> 0:03:48.119
<v Speaker 1>Matt Damon. I thought that's what had happened. I thought

0:03:48.120 --> 0:03:53.360
<v Speaker 1>it was all just an elaborate, uh marketing scheme for

0:03:53.440 --> 0:03:56.440
<v Speaker 1>the Martian And it turns out that's only part of it. Well,

0:03:56.640 --> 0:04:00.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean NASA is talking to Ridley Scott and mentioned

0:04:00.480 --> 0:04:03.440
<v Speaker 1>that later on. But yeah, I know they had this big,

0:04:03.600 --> 0:04:07.080
<v Speaker 1>big press release that was like water is totes probably

0:04:07.120 --> 0:04:11.680
<v Speaker 1>on Mars, guys. Yeah, which, depending on how closely you've

0:04:11.720 --> 0:04:13.840
<v Speaker 1>been paying attention for the last several decades, you might

0:04:13.880 --> 0:04:18.200
<v Speaker 1>have thought, haven't we known this for a while? Yeah.

0:04:18.279 --> 0:04:21.000
<v Speaker 1>I thought that they discovered water on Mars quite a

0:04:21.040 --> 0:04:25.680
<v Speaker 1>few times, and they sort of have we keep discovering it,

0:04:25.920 --> 0:04:29.840
<v Speaker 1>found it again, I guess. I guess here's the real problem.

0:04:29.920 --> 0:04:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Here's the reason why they have to keep announcing it.

0:04:32.160 --> 0:04:35.719
<v Speaker 1>We haven't brought a flag up there yet, so until

0:04:35.760 --> 0:04:39.080
<v Speaker 1>you have the flag, it's not really official. So that's

0:04:39.080 --> 0:04:42.520
<v Speaker 1>the no alright. So here's the actual announcement. This, This

0:04:42.560 --> 0:04:44.720
<v Speaker 1>is what was actually announced that that they had uncovered

0:04:44.720 --> 0:04:48.760
<v Speaker 1>the most compelling evidence so far that liquid water under

0:04:48.839 --> 0:04:53.640
<v Speaker 1>certain conditions still flows on or just below the surface

0:04:53.680 --> 0:04:56.159
<v Speaker 1>of Mars. And we'll talk about what that means a

0:04:56.200 --> 0:04:59.159
<v Speaker 1>little bit later, but before we do that, I thought

0:04:59.200 --> 0:05:01.240
<v Speaker 1>it might be cool to to talk about why is

0:05:01.279 --> 0:05:03.359
<v Speaker 1>this a big deal in the first place, and also

0:05:03.440 --> 0:05:07.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of lead up to the other discoveries that you

0:05:07.040 --> 0:05:10.480
<v Speaker 1>are alluding to, Joe, the ones that you know, haven't

0:05:10.520 --> 0:05:12.520
<v Speaker 1>we heard about water on Mars before? And the answer

0:05:12.560 --> 0:05:17.800
<v Speaker 1>is yes. But there's reasons why this particular announcement is exciting.

0:05:18.320 --> 0:05:22.279
<v Speaker 1>So in general, the conditions on Mars are not favorable

0:05:22.360 --> 0:05:26.080
<v Speaker 1>for water for multiple reasons. Yeah, yeah, yeah, And we're

0:05:26.120 --> 0:05:29.599
<v Speaker 1>talking about liquid water. Liquid water because it's pretty cold, yep.

0:05:29.680 --> 0:05:31.720
<v Speaker 1>So usually if you're talking about pure water, it would

0:05:31.720 --> 0:05:34.480
<v Speaker 1>be an ice form. It wouldn't be in liquid form, right,

0:05:34.520 --> 0:05:38.080
<v Speaker 1>it would freeze. And now occasionally, in some places on

0:05:38.160 --> 0:05:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Mars it does get above the freezing point. For fresh water.

0:05:42.240 --> 0:05:47.040
<v Speaker 1>The the warmest conditions on the equator of Mars can

0:05:47.120 --> 0:05:50.960
<v Speaker 1>sometimes get to like seventy degrees fahrenheit, which sounds nice. Sure,

0:05:51.080 --> 0:05:54.560
<v Speaker 1>that's very pleasant. It's like San Francisco. Mars is basically

0:05:54.600 --> 0:05:59.080
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco most of the time. It's more like Antarctica

0:05:59.160 --> 0:06:01.680
<v Speaker 1>or worse. That is that is true, yes, um, and

0:06:02.040 --> 0:06:04.080
<v Speaker 1>depending on when you go to San Francisco can seem

0:06:04.120 --> 0:06:10.760
<v Speaker 1>that way. Also, unlike San Francisco, uh, Mars has no atmosphere,

0:06:11.520 --> 0:06:14.800
<v Speaker 1>and so that's a very thin one. Yes, that's the

0:06:15.160 --> 0:06:17.880
<v Speaker 1>other side of the problem. So the very cold temperature

0:06:17.960 --> 0:06:21.840
<v Speaker 1>means that water either freezes, but the thinness of the

0:06:21.880 --> 0:06:25.120
<v Speaker 1>atmosphere also means that the boiling point for water is

0:06:25.240 --> 0:06:29.440
<v Speaker 1>very low, so very quickly and easily sublimates directly into

0:06:29.440 --> 0:06:32.800
<v Speaker 1>a gas, the water vapor. And then you have another issue,

0:06:32.839 --> 0:06:35.520
<v Speaker 1>which is that Mars, mars is gravity is not as

0:06:35.560 --> 0:06:38.680
<v Speaker 1>great as Earth's's, like thirties seven percent something along those lines,

0:06:38.720 --> 0:06:41.520
<v Speaker 1>somewhere in that range, and so some of that water

0:06:41.600 --> 0:06:44.800
<v Speaker 1>vapor gets boiled off into space and does not come

0:06:44.800 --> 0:06:47.640
<v Speaker 1>back to the water cycle. Right, It's not trapped the

0:06:47.640 --> 0:06:50.560
<v Speaker 1>way that it is here on Earth. Yes, so these

0:06:50.839 --> 0:06:56.159
<v Speaker 1>conditions all mean that that's why it's not totally covered

0:06:56.160 --> 0:06:58.680
<v Speaker 1>in water, right, that it's not wet, why it's not

0:06:58.760 --> 0:07:02.479
<v Speaker 1>wet exactly. So, But we have talked about water on

0:07:02.520 --> 0:07:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Mars many times before. And when I say we, I

0:07:04.640 --> 0:07:07.479
<v Speaker 1>mean human beings, I don't mean just this podcast. We

0:07:07.560 --> 0:07:10.480
<v Speaker 1>talked about Mars many times before. Yes, we have Mars

0:07:10.560 --> 0:07:14.080
<v Speaker 1>is awesome, uh, and we're doing stuff all the time.

0:07:14.200 --> 0:07:16.720
<v Speaker 1>I think we're gonna have another episode that links more

0:07:16.760 --> 0:07:19.440
<v Speaker 1>directly with the Martian in the near future to talk

0:07:19.480 --> 0:07:23.640
<v Speaker 1>about the technology in that uh, in that story. But

0:07:23.720 --> 0:07:28.640
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about the various observations and hypotheses about water

0:07:28.760 --> 0:07:31.440
<v Speaker 1>and Mars. Sure, well, people thought there was water on

0:07:31.480 --> 0:07:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Mars really before we had any good reason to think so. Yeah.

0:07:35.160 --> 0:07:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Back in the nineteenth century, there was an astronomer named

0:07:38.200 --> 0:07:43.239
<v Speaker 1>Giovanni Schiaparelli who described the appearance of certain physical features

0:07:43.280 --> 0:07:48.120
<v Speaker 1>on Mars as canally, not cannoli, which is what you're

0:07:48.120 --> 0:07:51.640
<v Speaker 1>supposed to take but you leave the gun, but cannally canally,

0:07:51.760 --> 0:07:55.800
<v Speaker 1>meaning channels. Now, the word canally looks a lot like

0:07:55.880 --> 0:08:00.880
<v Speaker 1>the English word canals, right, So there were some people

0:08:00.960 --> 0:08:05.720
<v Speaker 1>who translated canally into canals. Canals, however, implies that this

0:08:05.840 --> 0:08:09.800
<v Speaker 1>is a manufactured structure built right something that humans or

0:08:10.200 --> 0:08:12.640
<v Speaker 1>you know whatever beings Martians I guess in this case,

0:08:12.680 --> 0:08:15.560
<v Speaker 1>have dug out on purpose, right, as opposed to channels,

0:08:15.600 --> 0:08:19.560
<v Speaker 1>which could have been carved out through natural processes. Uh. So,

0:08:19.800 --> 0:08:23.320
<v Speaker 1>as we know, if there's even the slightest misstatement that

0:08:23.360 --> 0:08:26.240
<v Speaker 1>could be construed as the existence of life on Mars,

0:08:26.240 --> 0:08:28.640
<v Speaker 1>somebody's going to run with it. Yes, even before there

0:08:28.720 --> 0:08:31.840
<v Speaker 1>was a Facebook, there were moments like these. Uh in

0:08:31.840 --> 0:08:35.520
<v Speaker 1>this case, I know that literally anything happened before face. Yeah.

0:08:35.920 --> 0:08:38.640
<v Speaker 1>Can you just imagine what Perceval Lowell would have done

0:08:38.640 --> 0:08:42.440
<v Speaker 1>with Facebook. Perceval Lowell's American was an American businessman who

0:08:42.480 --> 0:08:47.040
<v Speaker 1>had an interest in astronomy, and he interpreted canally as

0:08:47.040 --> 0:08:52.000
<v Speaker 1>being canals and ran with that idea, really really pushed

0:08:52.040 --> 0:08:56.800
<v Speaker 1>the idea that Mars was a planet that had a sophisticated,

0:08:57.400 --> 0:09:01.680
<v Speaker 1>uh technologically advanced civilization that had this complex system of

0:09:01.720 --> 0:09:05.720
<v Speaker 1>canals carved into it that allowed the denizens of Mars,

0:09:05.760 --> 0:09:09.920
<v Speaker 1>the Martians, to transport goods and you know, vehicles and

0:09:09.960 --> 0:09:14.199
<v Speaker 1>get water to distant locations using this system. He really

0:09:14.200 --> 0:09:17.319
<v Speaker 1>went with that idea, despite the fact that no one

0:09:17.480 --> 0:09:21.679
<v Speaker 1>in the scientific community had actually proposed it at that point. However,

0:09:22.600 --> 0:09:25.079
<v Speaker 1>the idea kind of took hold for a while, um,

0:09:25.280 --> 0:09:28.280
<v Speaker 1>not just in popular circles, but then the scientific community

0:09:28.320 --> 0:09:31.040
<v Speaker 1>began to say, well, in all, it's possible that maybe

0:09:31.080 --> 0:09:35.840
<v Speaker 1>these are our actual structures and not just natural formations.

0:09:36.160 --> 0:09:38.440
<v Speaker 1>And if that's the case, then clearly there is some

0:09:38.520 --> 0:09:41.160
<v Speaker 1>form of intelligent life there. Yeah, so we should take

0:09:41.200 --> 0:09:44.240
<v Speaker 1>a better look at it. So let's develop some better telescopes. Yep.

0:09:44.400 --> 0:09:47.440
<v Speaker 1>And this happened very slowly. Obviously, it wasn't like an

0:09:47.440 --> 0:09:49.840
<v Speaker 1>overnight thing, although you know, it's easiest to look at

0:09:49.880 --> 0:09:53.400
<v Speaker 1>Mars when it's nighttime. In the nineteen twenties, some improvements

0:09:53.400 --> 0:09:55.600
<v Speaker 1>in telescope technology gave us a better look at the

0:09:55.640 --> 0:09:58.640
<v Speaker 1>red planet, and that's when scientists began to observe the

0:09:58.720 --> 0:10:01.319
<v Speaker 1>geological formations that led them to believe there were snow

0:10:01.320 --> 0:10:04.080
<v Speaker 1>caps at the polls, and that there were canals or

0:10:04.240 --> 0:10:07.200
<v Speaker 1>channels one or the other that actually had liquid in

0:10:07.360 --> 0:10:10.520
<v Speaker 1>them on the surface of Mars. During that time, that

0:10:10.559 --> 0:10:13.320
<v Speaker 1>was what they believe because their telescopes were not so

0:10:13.360 --> 0:10:16.600
<v Speaker 1>sensitive that they could actually see into these channels. They

0:10:16.600 --> 0:10:20.079
<v Speaker 1>could just see the patterns that are yeah, that that

0:10:20.280 --> 0:10:22.520
<v Speaker 1>looked like they were channels or canals. You couldn't really

0:10:22.559 --> 0:10:26.840
<v Speaker 1>be certain, but they were making a best guess, uh today,

0:10:26.880 --> 0:10:28.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if if there are canals, there have got

0:10:28.760 --> 0:10:32.440
<v Speaker 1>to be gondola's and and opera singers. I mean, there's

0:10:32.480 --> 0:10:35.520
<v Speaker 1>a whole like domino effect that goes on here. There's

0:10:35.559 --> 0:10:40.560
<v Speaker 1>probably you know, a giant casino that caters to those

0:10:40.600 --> 0:10:42.880
<v Speaker 1>folks like the Venetian Is that I guess it would

0:10:42.920 --> 0:10:47.960
<v Speaker 1>be the Martian Um anywhere. Yeah, I mean, you know,

0:10:48.080 --> 0:10:52.280
<v Speaker 1>we we see how this just leads to rampant speculation. Uh.

0:10:52.360 --> 0:10:55.360
<v Speaker 1>At any rate, Time magazine at that at that point

0:10:55.440 --> 0:10:58.080
<v Speaker 1>reported that the scientific belief was that not only was

0:10:58.200 --> 0:11:01.880
<v Speaker 1>their water on Mars like flow water, but also there

0:11:01.960 --> 0:11:05.719
<v Speaker 1>was an atmosphere, a thick, warm atmosphere on Mars and

0:11:05.880 --> 0:11:12.000
<v Speaker 1>vegetation on Mars. British astronomer PM Rives postulated there could

0:11:12.040 --> 0:11:14.600
<v Speaker 1>even be intelligent life on the planet. This was all

0:11:14.640 --> 0:11:18.120
<v Speaker 1>based upon just casual observation using the best technology they

0:11:18.120 --> 0:11:20.880
<v Speaker 1>had at the time. They didn't have any obviously, they

0:11:20.880 --> 0:11:23.280
<v Speaker 1>had no evidence of such things. They were just drawing

0:11:23.320 --> 0:11:26.959
<v Speaker 1>conclusions based upon what little detail they could see sure,

0:11:27.080 --> 0:11:29.520
<v Speaker 1>and and this would persist for the next couple of decades. Yeah.

0:11:29.640 --> 0:11:32.439
<v Speaker 1>By the nineties, there was still a belief that snow

0:11:32.480 --> 0:11:34.800
<v Speaker 1>would form at the polls, so that there was a

0:11:34.840 --> 0:11:38.120
<v Speaker 1>precipitation of snow, and that they would then melt during

0:11:38.120 --> 0:11:41.400
<v Speaker 1>the Martian summer and reform in the winter. And photographs

0:11:41.400 --> 0:11:44.080
<v Speaker 1>seemed to indicate that there was some vegetation on Mars.

0:11:44.080 --> 0:11:48.000
<v Speaker 1>They were actually looking at this area around Mars where

0:11:48.080 --> 0:11:50.640
<v Speaker 1>there was some brown and green coloration and they thought

0:11:50.679 --> 0:11:55.280
<v Speaker 1>that that was uh indicative of vegetation. Um. By the

0:11:55.320 --> 0:11:59.160
<v Speaker 1>nineteen sixties we had developed better close up imagery of Mars,

0:11:59.440 --> 0:12:03.120
<v Speaker 1>and scientists were beginning to revise their opinions about water

0:12:03.240 --> 0:12:08.000
<v Speaker 1>on Mars um. In fact, they began to dismiss earlier

0:12:08.040 --> 0:12:13.280
<v Speaker 1>ideas entirely, sometimes perhaps a little too readily. They dismissed

0:12:13.280 --> 0:12:15.719
<v Speaker 1>the idea that there was snow on Mars. This isn't okay, No,

0:12:15.840 --> 0:12:19.959
<v Speaker 1>there's not. There's no precipitation going on here. The areas

0:12:19.960 --> 0:12:22.960
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at, at the poles on Mars, those can't

0:12:23.000 --> 0:12:28.360
<v Speaker 1>be snow. It's most likely that's frozen carbon dioxide, not water. However,

0:12:28.840 --> 0:12:33.160
<v Speaker 1>in Texas, the McDonald Observatory claimed to have found conclusive

0:12:33.160 --> 0:12:36.320
<v Speaker 1>proof of water vapor in the Martian atmosphere. Now, did

0:12:36.400 --> 0:12:38.880
<v Speaker 1>y'all know that I just went to the McDonald Observatory

0:12:39.040 --> 0:12:41.560
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks ago. That you went to the actual

0:12:41.640 --> 0:12:44.560
<v Speaker 1>McDonald observatory, Right, You didn't just stare at a fast

0:12:44.600 --> 0:12:48.440
<v Speaker 1>food restaurant. No? No? In Texas? Yeah we um, My

0:12:48.520 --> 0:12:51.320
<v Speaker 1>wife Rachel and I went to Big Ben National Park

0:12:51.440 --> 0:12:54.720
<v Speaker 1>and McDonald Observatory is just north of there. That's really cool.

0:12:54.960 --> 0:12:57.040
<v Speaker 1>So we looked through the telescopes. I got to see

0:12:57.040 --> 0:13:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Saturn in its moons and that must have been actacular.

0:13:00.640 --> 0:13:02.719
<v Speaker 1>It was amazing. There was a close up of the

0:13:02.960 --> 0:13:09.000
<v Speaker 1>terminator line on the moon and uh and stand uh

0:13:09.400 --> 0:13:14.040
<v Speaker 1>it certainly is, but it was really cool. If you

0:13:14.040 --> 0:13:16.319
<v Speaker 1>ever get a chance to go to the McDonald Observatory

0:13:16.360 --> 0:13:18.679
<v Speaker 1>for one of their star parties or other events, I

0:13:18.760 --> 0:13:22.760
<v Speaker 1>highly recommended Russell. I'll I'm definitely putting that on my list.

0:13:23.440 --> 0:13:25.920
<v Speaker 1>I have never The only observatory I've ever gone to

0:13:26.120 --> 0:13:28.559
<v Speaker 1>is the one that's at um the telescope that's at

0:13:28.559 --> 0:13:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Firm Bank here in Atlanta, and I would love to

0:13:31.559 --> 0:13:33.959
<v Speaker 1>to travel to a few different places and check out

0:13:34.000 --> 0:13:37.840
<v Speaker 1>some other ones. Uh. So the observatory, the McDonald Observatory

0:13:38.040 --> 0:13:41.080
<v Speaker 1>used US spectrometers and we'll talk more about them a

0:13:41.120 --> 0:13:44.160
<v Speaker 1>little bit later, and that's what allowed them to detect

0:13:44.240 --> 0:13:47.720
<v Speaker 1>water vapor. Uh. They made observations in nineteen sixty nine

0:13:47.720 --> 0:13:50.839
<v Speaker 1>through nineteen seventy and then decided they needed to take

0:13:50.960 --> 0:13:54.800
<v Speaker 1>a more concentrated approach to this, and they focused on

0:13:54.840 --> 0:13:58.560
<v Speaker 1>it from nineteen seventy two to nineteen seventy four, over

0:13:58.600 --> 0:14:01.200
<v Speaker 1>the course of what was nearly a full Martian Year,

0:14:02.120 --> 0:14:05.199
<v Speaker 1>and in that they were able to detect different varying

0:14:05.240 --> 0:14:07.520
<v Speaker 1>amounts of water vapor throughout the Martian Year. They were

0:14:07.520 --> 0:14:12.280
<v Speaker 1>always tiny, but then Mars's atmospheres very thin, as we've said,

0:14:12.280 --> 0:14:14.120
<v Speaker 1>so you wouldn't expect there to be a lot of

0:14:14.160 --> 0:14:17.160
<v Speaker 1>water vapor. But they were able to detect it throughout

0:14:17.200 --> 0:14:20.000
<v Speaker 1>that time. But by the nineties seventies, we were starting

0:14:20.040 --> 0:14:23.160
<v Speaker 1>to send stuff towards Mars. Yeah, and sometimes it would

0:14:23.200 --> 0:14:27.600
<v Speaker 1>get there. H So I had the Viking program right, yep, yep.

0:14:27.720 --> 0:14:32.320
<v Speaker 1>I recently heard a podcast in which they they they

0:14:32.320 --> 0:14:34.440
<v Speaker 1>do a trivia at the end of it's a skeptic

0:14:34.440 --> 0:14:36.960
<v Speaker 1>SKYDDV Universe. Give him a shout out because I love

0:14:37.000 --> 0:14:39.080
<v Speaker 1>that show. But they do a trivia thing at the

0:14:39.160 --> 0:14:43.040
<v Speaker 1>very end where the host quizzes the other folks on

0:14:43.080 --> 0:14:46.120
<v Speaker 1>the podcast. They are not given the questions ahead of time.

0:14:46.160 --> 0:14:48.920
<v Speaker 1>They have to try and figure out they're given a selection.

0:14:48.920 --> 0:14:51.120
<v Speaker 1>They have to figure out which one of the selection

0:14:51.120 --> 0:14:54.720
<v Speaker 1>they're given is fiction and which ones are science. There's

0:14:54.760 --> 0:14:57.040
<v Speaker 1>one fiction and then the rest are science. And one

0:14:57.080 --> 0:15:00.280
<v Speaker 1>of the science ones was that there have been already

0:15:00.400 --> 0:15:04.360
<v Speaker 1>missions sent to Mars, but only eighteen have been successful.

0:15:04.840 --> 0:15:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Those are the ones that actually don't count the fly by's,

0:15:08.040 --> 0:15:10.720
<v Speaker 1>so they didn't count fly by missions, just just one

0:15:10.760 --> 0:15:13.240
<v Speaker 1>sent specifically to Mars, either an orbiter or a lander

0:15:13.280 --> 0:15:16.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, or rover or anything like that. So less

0:15:16.320 --> 0:15:20.160
<v Speaker 1>than fifty success rate. Uh so this is a big deal.

0:15:20.200 --> 0:15:24.560
<v Speaker 1>In the nineteen seventies, specifically in the Viking two orbiter

0:15:24.680 --> 0:15:27.520
<v Speaker 1>sent back data that showed frozen water at the north

0:15:27.600 --> 0:15:31.720
<v Speaker 1>pole of Mars, and new theories emerged that suggested there

0:15:31.920 --> 0:15:35.360
<v Speaker 1>was probably a level of perma frost beneath the surface

0:15:35.600 --> 0:15:38.240
<v Speaker 1>of Mars, so you have regular covering up a level

0:15:38.240 --> 0:15:41.720
<v Speaker 1>of perma frost, and they even thought there might be

0:15:41.760 --> 0:15:45.200
<v Speaker 1>the possibility that the poles, it's not just that there's

0:15:45.320 --> 0:15:48.640
<v Speaker 1>ice form there, but rather there's an enormous body of

0:15:48.720 --> 0:15:52.880
<v Speaker 1>ice that is concealed by Regulus, and it's more or

0:15:52.960 --> 0:15:55.840
<v Speaker 1>less like a giant iceberg, except in the ground as

0:15:55.840 --> 0:15:58.680
<v Speaker 1>opposed to floating in the ocean. So I thought that

0:15:58.760 --> 0:16:02.080
<v Speaker 1>was pretty cool. That's upping ahead because obviously we studied

0:16:02.120 --> 0:16:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Mars quite a bit over the decades. But in the

0:16:04.200 --> 0:16:08.400
<v Speaker 1>nineteen nineties, orbiters sent by NASA and the European Space

0:16:08.440 --> 0:16:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Agency discovered more evidence of water, at least in the

0:16:11.920 --> 0:16:15.720
<v Speaker 1>form of ice. Not not flowing water, but ice on Mars.

0:16:16.000 --> 0:16:19.440
<v Speaker 1>There appeared to be evidence for precipitation and flowing water

0:16:19.480 --> 0:16:22.760
<v Speaker 1>as well in Mars's past, if not the present. So

0:16:23.360 --> 0:16:28.280
<v Speaker 1>they saw areas like geological formations that that suggested there

0:16:28.320 --> 0:16:31.040
<v Speaker 1>was definitely some flowing water at some point in Mars's past,

0:16:31.680 --> 0:16:35.000
<v Speaker 1>probably a weather cycle of some sort, precipitation of some sort,

0:16:35.400 --> 0:16:37.800
<v Speaker 1>but they could not they did not directly observe any

0:16:37.800 --> 0:16:41.800
<v Speaker 1>of that, you know, happening present day. So the conclusion

0:16:41.920 --> 0:16:44.640
<v Speaker 1>was perhaps this was something that happened in the distant past,

0:16:45.200 --> 0:16:49.680
<v Speaker 1>and since then had things had changed. Um skip ahead

0:16:49.720 --> 0:16:51.480
<v Speaker 1>to two thousand and eight. That's when the Phoenix Lander

0:16:51.560 --> 0:16:54.600
<v Speaker 1>dug up some bright material that disappeared over the course

0:16:54.600 --> 0:16:57.160
<v Speaker 1>of a few days, and NASA concluded that it was

0:16:57.240 --> 0:17:00.440
<v Speaker 1>in fact water ice. It also detected the presence of

0:17:00.440 --> 0:17:03.960
<v Speaker 1>water vapor within the Martian atmosphere, and the rover's Spirit

0:17:04.000 --> 0:17:08.760
<v Speaker 1>and Opportunity also uncovered evidence of ice. Curiosity even drove

0:17:08.760 --> 0:17:11.840
<v Speaker 1>through an ancient river bed that held water billions of

0:17:11.920 --> 0:17:15.040
<v Speaker 1>years ago but no longer, so it didn't have to

0:17:15.119 --> 0:17:18.920
<v Speaker 1>ford a river or anything. In twenty fifteen, this year,

0:17:19.040 --> 0:17:22.160
<v Speaker 1>the year that we're recording this, before the most recent

0:17:22.200 --> 0:17:25.879
<v Speaker 1>evidence was made public, NASA announced a hypothesis that billions

0:17:26.000 --> 0:17:30.000
<v Speaker 1>of years ago, the northern hemisphere of Mars was essentially

0:17:30.440 --> 0:17:34.199
<v Speaker 1>an enormous ocean, uh that a large portion of it,

0:17:34.240 --> 0:17:38.160
<v Speaker 1>at any rate, was underwater. So they drew this conclusion

0:17:38.200 --> 0:17:40.679
<v Speaker 1>based upon data that was gathered by the European Southern

0:17:40.720 --> 0:17:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Observatories Very Large Telescope in Chile and the W. M.

0:17:44.720 --> 0:17:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Keck Observatory and NASA Infrared Telescope Facility in Hawaii. So

0:17:49.320 --> 0:17:51.639
<v Speaker 1>scientists calculated that one time there was enough water on

0:17:51.680 --> 0:17:54.439
<v Speaker 1>Mars to cover the entire planet, and an average depth

0:17:54.480 --> 0:17:56.680
<v Speaker 1>of four hundred fifty feet or about a hundred thirty

0:17:56.680 --> 0:17:59.080
<v Speaker 1>seven But the way that water works is usually not

0:17:59.160 --> 0:18:01.919
<v Speaker 1>that it's ring an entire planet. Yeah, it was actually

0:18:02.440 --> 0:18:05.640
<v Speaker 1>based upon their their guesses, because again these are all hypotheses.

0:18:05.720 --> 0:18:07.760
<v Speaker 1>No one was around back then to check up on

0:18:07.800 --> 0:18:12.359
<v Speaker 1>their their work. That the northern hemisphere sections of it

0:18:12.400 --> 0:18:16.159
<v Speaker 1>were probably just a gigantic ocean, and that this ocean

0:18:16.240 --> 0:18:18.879
<v Speaker 1>had depths that would reach more than a mile or

0:18:18.920 --> 0:18:23.160
<v Speaker 1>one point six kilometers in some places. Uh. If that's correct,

0:18:23.280 --> 0:18:24.960
<v Speaker 1>that would mean that the ocean would have covered about

0:18:25.080 --> 0:18:28.119
<v Speaker 1>nine of Mars's surface, And you can compare that to

0:18:28.200 --> 0:18:31.119
<v Speaker 1>something like the Atlantic Ocean here on Earth that covers

0:18:31.160 --> 0:18:34.720
<v Speaker 1>sevent of the Earth's surface, keeping in mind that Mars

0:18:34.800 --> 0:18:37.640
<v Speaker 1>is of course smaller than Earth. It's not like one

0:18:37.640 --> 0:18:43.320
<v Speaker 1>to one um comparison. Also, the Curiosity rover uncovered evidence

0:18:43.359 --> 0:18:45.760
<v Speaker 1>that water could be in liquid form on the Martian

0:18:45.840 --> 0:18:48.720
<v Speaker 1>surface due to salts in the Martian soil. We'll talk

0:18:48.760 --> 0:18:51.280
<v Speaker 1>more about this in a minute too. So the salts

0:18:51.760 --> 0:18:55.120
<v Speaker 1>could dissolve in water, and when you dissolve salts and water,

0:18:55.200 --> 0:18:58.520
<v Speaker 1>that lowers the freezing temperature of that water. So if

0:18:58.560 --> 0:19:01.480
<v Speaker 1>you are if you have the right type of salts,

0:19:01.520 --> 0:19:04.560
<v Speaker 1>you can lower, you can significantly lower that that freezing

0:19:04.560 --> 0:19:08.840
<v Speaker 1>temperature um and so under those conditions, at least and

0:19:08.880 --> 0:19:12.560
<v Speaker 1>at least temporarily, the there could be liquid water on

0:19:12.680 --> 0:19:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Mars's surface. Uh. And the general hypothesis, which will talk

0:19:18.520 --> 0:19:22.200
<v Speaker 1>more about again in a little bit, was that the

0:19:22.240 --> 0:19:25.280
<v Speaker 1>materials on the surface of Mars could actually absorb water

0:19:25.359 --> 0:19:29.760
<v Speaker 1>vapor in the atmosphere and turn into liquid water that way.

0:19:30.080 --> 0:19:32.000
<v Speaker 1>So it's not like it's not like the ice was

0:19:32.040 --> 0:19:35.560
<v Speaker 1>melting and then flowing through, but rather that it was

0:19:35.760 --> 0:19:39.119
<v Speaker 1>being rained down on exactly. It was more that it

0:19:39.200 --> 0:19:41.560
<v Speaker 1>was kind of almost like a condensation sort of thing,

0:19:41.560 --> 0:19:47.000
<v Speaker 1>except you know, really absorption, not condensation. Uh. So that's that,

0:19:47.000 --> 0:19:50.679
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of everything leading up to the most recent announcement.

0:19:51.040 --> 0:19:54.040
<v Speaker 1>So what was the most recent announcement. Well, it was

0:19:54.200 --> 0:19:58.199
<v Speaker 1>the newest and strongest evidence of flowing water on Mars,

0:19:58.280 --> 0:20:01.040
<v Speaker 1>and it was it was actually search that was published

0:20:01.040 --> 0:20:06.679
<v Speaker 1>in the Nature Geoscience paper on September and then it

0:20:06.800 --> 0:20:09.960
<v Speaker 1>was picked up by by NASSA, which gave a press

0:20:10.000 --> 0:20:12.720
<v Speaker 1>release on it and then did a big announcement and

0:20:13.280 --> 0:20:16.919
<v Speaker 1>had a big media what would you call it a

0:20:17.040 --> 0:20:22.280
<v Speaker 1>media buffet or or or a lot of maybe water

0:20:22.320 --> 0:20:27.920
<v Speaker 1>cooler talk Martian water coolers. Yeah, and uh, I wanted

0:20:27.960 --> 0:20:30.679
<v Speaker 1>to point out, Yeah, the lead author of the study

0:20:30.800 --> 0:20:33.439
<v Speaker 1>was a graduate student from our own Georgia Tech right

0:20:33.520 --> 0:20:37.960
<v Speaker 1>here in Atlanta, Georgia Tech. Go Bulldogs, wolf Wolf Well,

0:20:38.119 --> 0:20:41.000
<v Speaker 1>our city's owned Georgia Tech. Uh, and he was named

0:20:41.200 --> 0:20:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Legendra Oja. I hope I'm pronouncing that right. If not,

0:20:44.640 --> 0:20:47.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure all gets an email. But anyway, what was

0:20:48.000 --> 0:20:51.359
<v Speaker 1>this new evidence? Of course, Jonathan, you brought up the

0:20:51.400 --> 0:20:54.280
<v Speaker 1>idea of fording a river. I I did hope when

0:20:54.280 --> 0:20:57.240
<v Speaker 1>we first heard about this, the Curiosity Rover had come

0:20:57.320 --> 0:20:59.720
<v Speaker 1>up to a river and then was given the option,

0:21:00.119 --> 0:21:02.679
<v Speaker 1>l do you want to build a raft board it

0:21:02.880 --> 0:21:05.800
<v Speaker 1>or give the ferryman to barrels of salt pork. Oh.

0:21:05.800 --> 0:21:08.760
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was gonna be like the Mars equivalent

0:21:08.760 --> 0:21:12.199
<v Speaker 1>of Oregon Trail, Like, oh, the Curiosity Rover has got

0:21:12.320 --> 0:21:18.000
<v Speaker 1>dysentery and and broke a lego hair wheels were lost. Yeah,

0:21:18.040 --> 0:21:20.680
<v Speaker 1>now it has to go shoot a Mars bear. Yeah,

0:21:20.720 --> 0:21:25.280
<v Speaker 1>that's a great game. So yeah, that was not what happened. Obviously,

0:21:25.280 --> 0:21:28.159
<v Speaker 1>the Curiosity Rover did not come across a large body

0:21:28.240 --> 0:21:32.119
<v Speaker 1>of water on Mars. That's not how this discovery was made. No,

0:21:32.320 --> 0:21:34.639
<v Speaker 1>in fact, it wasn't the Curiosity rover at all, but

0:21:34.680 --> 0:21:37.680
<v Speaker 1>it was following up on the same lead you mentioned

0:21:37.720 --> 0:21:41.560
<v Speaker 1>earlier about the yeah, the hydrated salts in the soil

0:21:41.600 --> 0:21:45.600
<v Speaker 1>of Mars. So the evidence came from the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter,

0:21:45.800 --> 0:21:48.240
<v Speaker 1>the m r O, and what it was looking into

0:21:48.400 --> 0:21:51.840
<v Speaker 1>was that on some downhill slopes on Mars you can

0:21:51.880 --> 0:21:55.439
<v Speaker 1>see dark streaks that have been given the name recurring

0:21:55.680 --> 0:22:00.520
<v Speaker 1>slope Linneer or RSL, and these dark streaks have a

0:22:00.520 --> 0:22:05.560
<v Speaker 1>tendency to grow darker and move downhill in the warmer seasons,

0:22:05.640 --> 0:22:09.040
<v Speaker 1>and on Mars, the warm season means when the temperature

0:22:09.119 --> 0:22:12.240
<v Speaker 1>is above negative ten degrease fahrenheit or negative twenty three

0:22:12.240 --> 0:22:16.359
<v Speaker 1>degrees celsius, absolutely balmy. And then of course when the

0:22:16.400 --> 0:22:20.080
<v Speaker 1>weather on Mars gets colder again, they fade away. And

0:22:20.160 --> 0:22:22.480
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of these things, there are thousands

0:22:22.520 --> 0:22:25.080
<v Speaker 1>of them, and imaging instrument on the mr O is

0:22:25.160 --> 0:22:28.520
<v Speaker 1>captured images of rs L s at dozens of sights

0:22:28.560 --> 0:22:30.960
<v Speaker 1>on the surface of Mars. Right, so that leads to

0:22:31.000 --> 0:22:34.399
<v Speaker 1>the question what could be causing this this discoloration, if

0:22:34.400 --> 0:22:38.080
<v Speaker 1>you will, this change of of the color of the

0:22:38.160 --> 0:22:40.919
<v Speaker 1>soil on Mars through the warmer months and then the

0:22:41.000 --> 0:22:44.160
<v Speaker 1>retreat of that in the winter months. And when we

0:22:44.200 --> 0:22:47.119
<v Speaker 1>want to try to figure out what is going on

0:22:47.240 --> 0:22:49.919
<v Speaker 1>with changes in in the color of an object, we

0:22:49.960 --> 0:22:53.920
<v Speaker 1>can use a spectrometer, right, So there's an imaging spectrometer

0:22:54.040 --> 0:22:58.400
<v Speaker 1>called the Compact Reconnaissance Imaging spectrometer for Mars or the

0:22:58.480 --> 0:23:03.800
<v Speaker 1>cruisum chrism to uh that these researchers used to determine

0:23:03.840 --> 0:23:07.560
<v Speaker 1>that the darkened streaks were hydrated salts. And of course

0:23:07.600 --> 0:23:11.000
<v Speaker 1>what does the spectrometer do uses what we know about

0:23:11.040 --> 0:23:15.000
<v Speaker 1>how different types of molecules or or materials absorb different

0:23:15.000 --> 0:23:17.719
<v Speaker 1>spectra of light, and then it looks at the colors

0:23:17.760 --> 0:23:20.800
<v Speaker 1>of light to determine what molecules are probably present in

0:23:20.840 --> 0:23:23.119
<v Speaker 1>the object it's looking at. Yes, we use this a

0:23:23.160 --> 0:23:25.920
<v Speaker 1>lot in in astronomy, also in chemistry obviously, but in

0:23:26.000 --> 0:23:28.600
<v Speaker 1>astronomy in order to kind of get an idea of

0:23:28.640 --> 0:23:32.320
<v Speaker 1>what distant bodies may be composed of if we aren't

0:23:32.359 --> 0:23:35.720
<v Speaker 1>able to get direct access to those things. Yeah, so

0:23:35.920 --> 0:23:39.000
<v Speaker 1>when they looked at the RSL locations that were I

0:23:39.040 --> 0:23:41.360
<v Speaker 1>guess you could call them waxing, the ones that are

0:23:41.400 --> 0:23:47.000
<v Speaker 1>growing wider and darker. They detected hydrated salts with with

0:23:47.119 --> 0:23:50.439
<v Speaker 1>the chrism, and then they looked at the same sites

0:23:50.520 --> 0:23:52.960
<v Speaker 1>when the rs l s had retreated, and they did

0:23:53.040 --> 0:23:56.399
<v Speaker 1>not detect hydrated salts with the spectrometer. So it looks

0:23:56.400 --> 0:24:01.879
<v Speaker 1>like salts equal streaks. No salts equals no streets. Interesting.

0:24:02.280 --> 0:24:05.800
<v Speaker 1>So this kind of goes back to what that previous

0:24:05.880 --> 0:24:11.240
<v Speaker 1>hypothesis I mentioned from earlier stated, the idea that there

0:24:11.240 --> 0:24:15.400
<v Speaker 1>are these these materials, these salts on mars that occasionally

0:24:15.440 --> 0:24:18.240
<v Speaker 1>absorb water through some means, whether it's through the water

0:24:18.320 --> 0:24:20.679
<v Speaker 1>vapor or something else that we're not yet aware of,

0:24:20.960 --> 0:24:24.119
<v Speaker 1>lower the freezing temperature of that water, which allows it

0:24:24.200 --> 0:24:27.040
<v Speaker 1>to be in liquid form rather than just water vapor

0:24:27.280 --> 0:24:30.240
<v Speaker 1>or ice. Yeah, and so you're familiar with how salt

0:24:30.400 --> 0:24:32.920
<v Speaker 1>changes the freezing temperature of water if you've ever seen

0:24:32.960 --> 0:24:35.280
<v Speaker 1>a salted road or just poured salt on an ice

0:24:35.320 --> 0:24:38.320
<v Speaker 1>cube for fun, or had ice cream which has salt

0:24:38.359 --> 0:24:41.440
<v Speaker 1>in it to you know, help it get all ice creamy.

0:24:41.480 --> 0:24:44.920
<v Speaker 1>Except that the hydrated salts detected in this research weren't

0:24:45.119 --> 0:24:48.280
<v Speaker 1>just standard earth salt, which would be in a cl

0:24:48.400 --> 0:24:51.199
<v Speaker 1>or sodium chloride, the table salt we all know and

0:24:51.280 --> 0:24:57.399
<v Speaker 1>love and pour in our mouths directly. So sodium chloride

0:24:57.400 --> 0:24:59.720
<v Speaker 1>can lower the freezing temperature of water a good bit

0:25:00.160 --> 0:25:02.719
<v Speaker 1>based on how much salt is mixed in with the water. So,

0:25:02.760 --> 0:25:05.480
<v Speaker 1>according to our House to Works article on this, a

0:25:05.520 --> 0:25:09.480
<v Speaker 1>ten percent salt solution freezes at twenty degrees fahrenheit or

0:25:09.520 --> 0:25:15.080
<v Speaker 1>negative six degrees celsius, and a solution freezes at two

0:25:15.080 --> 0:25:18.560
<v Speaker 1>degrees fahrenheit or negative sixteen. I tried to see what

0:25:18.680 --> 0:25:22.320
<v Speaker 1>the lowest was. I found one website saying that that

0:25:22.359 --> 0:25:23.840
<v Speaker 1>if you get to the point where the water is

0:25:23.880 --> 0:25:27.679
<v Speaker 1>completely saturated with salt and will not absorb any more salt,

0:25:28.280 --> 0:25:30.520
<v Speaker 1>the freezing temperature will go all the way down to

0:25:30.600 --> 0:25:35.600
<v Speaker 1>negative six degrees fahrenheit or negative got you, so, yeah,

0:25:35.640 --> 0:25:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Obviously you're limited by the chemicals um that are are

0:25:40.320 --> 0:25:43.040
<v Speaker 1>dissolved within the water, right And and if it reaches

0:25:43.080 --> 0:25:48.200
<v Speaker 1>saturation and the freezing point is still uh is still

0:25:49.280 --> 0:25:53.240
<v Speaker 1>higher than the low temperature, then it's still good. Freeze

0:25:53.320 --> 0:25:56.600
<v Speaker 1>table salt wouldn't cut it on Mars. But according to

0:25:56.640 --> 0:25:59.800
<v Speaker 1>the authors of the Nature Geoscience paper, this announcement is

0:26:00.000 --> 0:26:03.680
<v Speaker 1>baced on the data returned from the imaging spectrometer makes

0:26:03.720 --> 0:26:06.680
<v Speaker 1>it look like these hydrated salts found on the downhill

0:26:06.720 --> 0:26:12.240
<v Speaker 1>flows or minerals called perclorates. UH specifically quote a mixture

0:26:12.240 --> 0:26:18.119
<v Speaker 1>of magnesium perclorate, magnesium chlorate, and sodium perchlorate. Why is

0:26:18.160 --> 0:26:22.240
<v Speaker 1>this significant because these perclorates are salts on steroids. When

0:26:22.240 --> 0:26:25.800
<v Speaker 1>it comes to changing the properties of water, some percolorates

0:26:25.840 --> 0:26:28.959
<v Speaker 1>can lower the freezing temperature of water below negative ninety

0:26:29.080 --> 0:26:34.400
<v Speaker 1>four degrees fahrenheit or negative seventy degrees celsius. So having

0:26:34.400 --> 0:26:37.960
<v Speaker 1>liquid water at that temperature is it's hard to imagine. Yeah, yeah,

0:26:38.880 --> 0:26:41.880
<v Speaker 1>now the evidence is not. We should specify that there

0:26:41.920 --> 0:26:45.480
<v Speaker 1>are strong flowing rivers somewhere on the surface of marks,

0:26:45.520 --> 0:26:52.080
<v Speaker 1>really super super cold flowing rivers. These this is flowing water,

0:26:52.720 --> 0:26:55.040
<v Speaker 1>but it's probably only a and and I want to

0:26:55.119 --> 0:26:58.960
<v Speaker 1>quote the NASA press release here a shallow subsurface flow

0:26:59.480 --> 0:27:03.240
<v Speaker 1>with enough water wicking to the surface to explain the darkening.

0:27:03.640 --> 0:27:06.439
<v Speaker 1>So a more apt analogy would be to think of

0:27:06.480 --> 0:27:11.720
<v Speaker 1>water sort of flowing through a sponge instead of rushing

0:27:11.800 --> 0:27:17.040
<v Speaker 1>over the top of a surface. So that then leads

0:27:17.119 --> 0:27:19.399
<v Speaker 1>us to a question that we don't necessarily have an

0:27:19.400 --> 0:27:24.159
<v Speaker 1>answer for yet, although we have some good hypotheses about it.

0:27:24.240 --> 0:27:26.919
<v Speaker 1>Where is this water coming from? That's a good question.

0:27:27.000 --> 0:27:29.879
<v Speaker 1>We don't know. You mentioned earlier. The hypothesis was that

0:27:29.960 --> 0:27:32.520
<v Speaker 1>it was being absorbed from the atmosphere. But a tough

0:27:32.560 --> 0:27:36.000
<v Speaker 1>thing about that is our data on the Martian atmosphere

0:27:36.440 --> 0:27:40.000
<v Speaker 1>says that it's not wet. There's very very little water

0:27:40.080 --> 0:27:43.080
<v Speaker 1>vases pretty dry in the Martian atmosphere, not enough that

0:27:43.160 --> 0:27:45.359
<v Speaker 1>the soil would really be able to absorb it. So

0:27:45.440 --> 0:27:49.800
<v Speaker 1>unless our data is not accurate about that, it's probably

0:27:49.800 --> 0:27:52.160
<v Speaker 1>not coming from the atmosphere, or maybe that that our

0:27:52.240 --> 0:27:55.560
<v Speaker 1>data is coming from a part of the atmosphere that's

0:27:55.640 --> 0:27:58.879
<v Speaker 1>different from the lower atmosphere where these salts could be

0:27:58.920 --> 0:28:01.960
<v Speaker 1>absorbing water vapor from. But let's say that our data

0:28:02.080 --> 0:28:05.000
<v Speaker 1>is correct. If it's not coming from above, it would

0:28:05.600 --> 0:28:08.280
<v Speaker 1>necessarily have to be coming from below. And that's another

0:28:08.320 --> 0:28:12.000
<v Speaker 1>cool possibility. It could be that there are aquifers under

0:28:12.040 --> 0:28:14.960
<v Speaker 1>the ground on the surface of Mars that when the

0:28:15.080 --> 0:28:18.879
<v Speaker 1>warmer months come along, warmer months Mars months. When the

0:28:18.920 --> 0:28:23.800
<v Speaker 1>warmer times come along, the aquifers under the ground unfreeze.

0:28:23.880 --> 0:28:26.600
<v Speaker 1>They melt, and then some of the water seeps up

0:28:26.680 --> 0:28:30.320
<v Speaker 1>to be absorbed by these perchlorate's, by these salts near

0:28:30.440 --> 0:28:33.359
<v Speaker 1>the surface of the planet, and then we get the

0:28:33.400 --> 0:28:37.119
<v Speaker 1>wet salts. Yeah, it's pretty interesting. So, uh, you know,

0:28:38.880 --> 0:28:42.280
<v Speaker 1>I love that when we get announcements like these, it

0:28:42.400 --> 0:28:45.280
<v Speaker 1>leads to more questions for us to to ask and

0:28:45.400 --> 0:28:49.520
<v Speaker 1>an attempt to answer. And some of these questions we

0:28:49.600 --> 0:28:53.440
<v Speaker 1>may ultimately be able to answer through direct observation or

0:28:53.560 --> 0:28:57.520
<v Speaker 1>or through various tests. There are other questions that might

0:28:57.680 --> 0:29:00.840
<v Speaker 1>end up being um a little tough for to answer,

0:29:01.000 --> 0:29:05.360
<v Speaker 1>at least in the the foreseeable future. Uh. One of

0:29:05.360 --> 0:29:10.400
<v Speaker 1>the big questions we have is does this mean that

0:29:10.440 --> 0:29:14.440
<v Speaker 1>there could actually be life on Mars. That's a pretty

0:29:14.440 --> 0:29:17.280
<v Speaker 1>big one. That's a giant question. It's definitely what all

0:29:17.320 --> 0:29:19.520
<v Speaker 1>the media people want to know. I watched a couple

0:29:19.560 --> 0:29:22.240
<v Speaker 1>of interviews with the lead author of this paper, the

0:29:22.240 --> 0:29:26.959
<v Speaker 1>guy from Georgia Tech, and there were all these reporters

0:29:27.000 --> 0:29:31.120
<v Speaker 1>were asking questions about the discovery, but the thing they

0:29:31.120 --> 0:29:34.320
<v Speaker 1>wanted to know was does this mean there's life on Mars?

0:29:34.760 --> 0:29:37.080
<v Speaker 1>And it seemed to me like he didn't really have

0:29:37.240 --> 0:29:40.080
<v Speaker 1>a very strong opinion on that, and he was more

0:29:40.120 --> 0:29:44.000
<v Speaker 1>interested in talking about the you know, the planetary science,

0:29:44.040 --> 0:29:46.880
<v Speaker 1>and you know, yeah, I mean it's like if you

0:29:46.920 --> 0:29:50.280
<v Speaker 1>go to someone whose discipline is in one area of

0:29:50.320 --> 0:29:53.600
<v Speaker 1>science and you ask them something of that's in an

0:29:53.680 --> 0:29:57.880
<v Speaker 1>unconnected science, then I think the answer is probably gonna

0:29:57.880 --> 0:30:00.760
<v Speaker 1>be pretty much the same, like, well, I guess not

0:30:00.840 --> 0:30:03.920
<v Speaker 1>what I was studying at all or not, or I

0:30:03.960 --> 0:30:10.120
<v Speaker 1>don't care. Well, my album there's a there's a couple

0:30:10.200 --> 0:30:14.360
<v Speaker 1>of different um kind kind of arguments that one could make. Yeah.

0:30:14.440 --> 0:30:17.000
<v Speaker 1>One one thing I saw was there was a really

0:30:17.040 --> 0:30:21.120
<v Speaker 1>good New York Times article by Kenneth Chang covering this discovery,

0:30:21.520 --> 0:30:24.400
<v Speaker 1>and it it had quotes from scientists both pro and

0:30:24.600 --> 0:30:27.600
<v Speaker 1>con the idea that this would lend credence to life

0:30:27.640 --> 0:30:30.360
<v Speaker 1>on Mars. One of the cons came from a NASA

0:30:30.400 --> 0:30:35.360
<v Speaker 1>astrobiologist named Christopher McKay Christopher P. McKay uh and to

0:30:35.440 --> 0:30:37.680
<v Speaker 1>the New York Times, he said, the short answer for

0:30:37.760 --> 0:30:42.120
<v Speaker 1>habitability is that it means nothing. So he points out

0:30:42.160 --> 0:30:45.480
<v Speaker 1>that the water would be way too salty to support life,

0:30:45.600 --> 0:30:48.720
<v Speaker 1>at least any life that we have ever observed here

0:30:48.720 --> 0:30:51.360
<v Speaker 1>on Earth. Yeah, And he cites the example of a

0:30:51.400 --> 0:30:55.240
<v Speaker 1>pond in Antarctica called the Don Juan Pond, which sounds

0:30:55.320 --> 0:30:59.640
<v Speaker 1>really cool. Yeah, it's like it's a hot tub. This

0:31:01.480 --> 0:31:05.760
<v Speaker 1>it's the sexiest, coldest, saltiest pond and Antarctica. Yeah, and

0:31:05.920 --> 0:31:09.440
<v Speaker 1>it it remains liquid even in freezing temperatures because of

0:31:09.440 --> 0:31:12.320
<v Speaker 1>the presence of high levels of calcium chloride. But it

0:31:12.560 --> 0:31:16.520
<v Speaker 1>is not a very life friendly pond. Right, So in

0:31:16.920 --> 0:31:20.360
<v Speaker 1>this case we talk about how conditions on Mars are

0:31:20.400 --> 0:31:26.360
<v Speaker 1>still incredibly um uh tough for any living creature, that

0:31:26.560 --> 0:31:29.240
<v Speaker 1>even even microbes that we've encountered here on Earth. So

0:31:29.720 --> 0:31:33.280
<v Speaker 1>not just the brininess of the water, which is already

0:31:33.280 --> 0:31:36.959
<v Speaker 1>a huge issue, but also the temperatures of Mars and

0:31:37.040 --> 0:31:41.160
<v Speaker 1>the radiation that that the surface of Mars ends up

0:31:41.800 --> 0:31:44.840
<v Speaker 1>being subjected to. So all of these things mean that

0:31:45.680 --> 0:31:48.120
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't mean that there's not life on Mars. It

0:31:48.240 --> 0:31:51.920
<v Speaker 1>just means that we haven't found enough evidence to make

0:31:52.040 --> 0:31:55.920
<v Speaker 1>us feel confident one way or the other. Yeah, But

0:31:56.040 --> 0:31:59.280
<v Speaker 1>there there are also arguments that go the other way.

0:31:59.680 --> 0:32:02.360
<v Speaker 1>The same New York Times article talked to the geophysicist

0:32:02.440 --> 0:32:05.960
<v Speaker 1>named David E. Stillman, who made the point that some

0:32:06.040 --> 0:32:09.000
<v Speaker 1>water might be saltier than other water on Mars. In

0:32:09.000 --> 0:32:11.600
<v Speaker 1>the same way that some water on Earth is saltier

0:32:11.600 --> 0:32:13.880
<v Speaker 1>than other water. You might not want to live in

0:32:13.920 --> 0:32:15.840
<v Speaker 1>the Dead Sea, but you could live in some other

0:32:15.880 --> 0:32:19.160
<v Speaker 1>body of water like the Pacific. Yeah, And so it's so.

0:32:19.400 --> 0:32:22.160
<v Speaker 1>The idea was that the streaks that only appear in

0:32:22.200 --> 0:32:26.200
<v Speaker 1>the warmest conditions would require less salt to melt, meaning

0:32:26.240 --> 0:32:28.760
<v Speaker 1>that maybe they could harbor life even if some other

0:32:28.880 --> 0:32:32.400
<v Speaker 1>streaks couldn't. Yeah. There could also be pockets of water

0:32:32.680 --> 0:32:37.280
<v Speaker 1>under the surface of Mars that are warmed through geological

0:32:38.040 --> 0:32:41.880
<v Speaker 1>processes that were not aware of yet that could support life,

0:32:42.000 --> 0:32:44.440
<v Speaker 1>and we just haven't been able to observe those yet.

0:32:44.520 --> 0:32:47.120
<v Speaker 1>That's a possibility. Although it's one of those it's like

0:32:47.840 --> 0:32:50.480
<v Speaker 1>it could be there or it could not be there

0:32:50.640 --> 0:32:54.680
<v Speaker 1>to not Yeah. So it's not even not like it's

0:32:54.680 --> 0:32:58.560
<v Speaker 1>not a counter argument so much as saying, again, this

0:32:58.640 --> 0:33:02.360
<v Speaker 1>is not this is not a smoking gun in either direction,

0:33:02.520 --> 0:33:06.720
<v Speaker 1>right uh. The astrophysics blogger Ethan Siegel, who I follow

0:33:06.800 --> 0:33:08.680
<v Speaker 1>also wrote a short piece about this, and he just

0:33:08.720 --> 0:33:11.720
<v Speaker 1>pointed out that some life forms on Earth do take

0:33:11.760 --> 0:33:16.200
<v Speaker 1>advantage of really salty conditions, like the desert salt bush,

0:33:16.280 --> 0:33:20.680
<v Speaker 1>which apparently sucks up salts to help it retain moisture

0:33:20.680 --> 0:33:24.400
<v Speaker 1>and dry places. And so he wrote, quote, while large

0:33:24.480 --> 0:33:27.400
<v Speaker 1>multicellular life doesn't appear to be the norm on Mars,

0:33:27.680 --> 0:33:31.640
<v Speaker 1>single celled salt rich life might be extant today. First

0:33:31.680 --> 0:33:34.760
<v Speaker 1>to get the salt, then you get the power, then

0:33:34.760 --> 0:33:38.560
<v Speaker 1>you get the microbes. So I think that's how it goes.

0:33:38.880 --> 0:33:41.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm pretty sure. Well, okay, so we've got a rover

0:33:41.800 --> 0:33:43.920
<v Speaker 1>on Mars. Why don't we just tell it to go

0:33:44.000 --> 0:33:47.440
<v Speaker 1>check this out? Well, especially since it's relatively close to

0:33:47.560 --> 0:33:49.680
<v Speaker 1>the to the one of the areas that was being

0:33:49.680 --> 0:33:52.800
<v Speaker 1>observed that that led to this discovery. It's just thirty

0:33:52.800 --> 0:33:57.160
<v Speaker 1>miles away, curiosity rover forty kilometers away from that location.

0:33:57.320 --> 0:33:59.560
<v Speaker 1>We don't want it to get stuck in the mud. Obviously,

0:34:00.680 --> 0:34:04.800
<v Speaker 1>the real the real reasons that it's illegal. Um, here's

0:34:04.800 --> 0:34:09.040
<v Speaker 1>the crazy It is illegal. There are no necessarily laws

0:34:09.080 --> 0:34:11.000
<v Speaker 1>on Mars, but there are laws on Earth about what

0:34:11.040 --> 0:34:13.960
<v Speaker 1>we can do on Mars. And one of those laws

0:34:14.520 --> 0:34:17.000
<v Speaker 1>was the Outer Space Treaty, which we have talked about

0:34:17.040 --> 0:34:21.320
<v Speaker 1>previously on this podcast. There are all sorts of conditions

0:34:21.360 --> 0:34:24.560
<v Speaker 1>within that treaty that indicated what you could and couldn't

0:34:24.600 --> 0:34:26.960
<v Speaker 1>do an outer space like you're not supposed to weaponize

0:34:27.000 --> 0:34:31.160
<v Speaker 1>outer space. You can't claim a celestial body as the

0:34:31.160 --> 0:34:34.440
<v Speaker 1>property of a nation. You can't do that. Well, one

0:34:34.440 --> 0:34:36.520
<v Speaker 1>of the other things that is covered in this outer

0:34:36.560 --> 0:34:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Space Treaty is the idea of contamidating an alien planet

0:34:42.160 --> 0:34:45.640
<v Speaker 1>or alien body of some sort with life from Earth.

0:34:45.760 --> 0:34:49.799
<v Speaker 1>It's the prime directive basically, Yeah, prime directive down to

0:34:50.000 --> 0:34:54.120
<v Speaker 1>the single celled organism level. So you know, even even

0:34:54.239 --> 0:34:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Kirk and Picard would both say that, all right, sometimes

0:34:58.080 --> 0:35:01.360
<v Speaker 1>you gotta break the prime directive. Well, they would liberally

0:35:01.440 --> 0:35:05.080
<v Speaker 1>break this this particular part of the primee directive. Uh,

0:35:05.480 --> 0:35:07.960
<v Speaker 1>because you know, human beings were just big old microbe

0:35:08.160 --> 0:35:11.879
<v Speaker 1>clouds walking around and when we when we encounter other people,

0:35:12.160 --> 0:35:15.040
<v Speaker 1>we share microbes and we take home some of our

0:35:15.080 --> 0:35:19.160
<v Speaker 1>buddies microbes whenever we say goodbye, and that just if

0:35:19.160 --> 0:35:22.040
<v Speaker 1>you like, Right now, in this little tiny room, it's

0:35:22.120 --> 0:35:27.000
<v Speaker 1>microbe soup, and in the curiosity probably has some Earth

0:35:27.080 --> 0:35:31.040
<v Speaker 1>microbes on it. Yeah. So microbes are incredible. They can

0:35:31.080 --> 0:35:35.000
<v Speaker 1>be incredibly resilient. Right, We've seen microbes that can survive

0:35:35.120 --> 0:35:38.480
<v Speaker 1>in near vacuum conditions. We've seen microbes that can survive

0:35:38.640 --> 0:35:43.080
<v Speaker 1>at at really severe temperatures either really hot or really cold, uh,

0:35:43.080 --> 0:35:46.719
<v Speaker 1>in lots of different conditions. So because we know that

0:35:46.920 --> 0:35:50.280
<v Speaker 1>we cannot be certain that the Curiosity Rover is completely

0:35:50.320 --> 0:35:54.200
<v Speaker 1>free of microbes, and the sterilization processes we have, we

0:35:54.239 --> 0:35:57.000
<v Speaker 1>can't even be certain that those would eliminate all microbes

0:35:57.160 --> 0:35:59.600
<v Speaker 1>from the rover. Part of the problem is that if

0:35:59.600 --> 0:36:01.799
<v Speaker 1>we really really wanted to be sure, we would be

0:36:01.920 --> 0:36:05.759
<v Speaker 1>using methods that could damage the rover itself. So you

0:36:05.800 --> 0:36:07.799
<v Speaker 1>have to balance out, like, well, how can we be

0:36:07.960 --> 0:36:11.799
<v Speaker 1>reasonably certain that the material is sterilized versus make sure

0:36:11.840 --> 0:36:14.799
<v Speaker 1>we don't fry the insides of this thing? Uh And

0:36:14.880 --> 0:36:20.279
<v Speaker 1>that's really a legitimate worry in in UH in space explorations.

0:36:20.360 --> 0:36:24.359
<v Speaker 1>So we have the Curiosity Rover. It could technically go

0:36:24.560 --> 0:36:27.879
<v Speaker 1>and collect samples like it has the ability to do that,

0:36:28.360 --> 0:36:31.799
<v Speaker 1>but legally speaking, we can't do that because you might

0:36:31.840 --> 0:36:36.640
<v Speaker 1>contaminate that sample with microbes from Earth, which one would

0:36:37.280 --> 0:36:39.960
<v Speaker 1>mess up any kind of analysis here. Doing you might

0:36:40.040 --> 0:36:42.640
<v Speaker 1>end up getting a false positive because you detect microbes

0:36:42.680 --> 0:36:44.919
<v Speaker 1>and it turns out that those just hitched a ride

0:36:44.920 --> 0:36:47.200
<v Speaker 1>with you in the first place. This is very similar

0:36:47.239 --> 0:36:50.239
<v Speaker 1>to when we thought that we had discovered methane and

0:36:50.320 --> 0:36:52.279
<v Speaker 1>the atmosphere of Mars, and it turned out that was

0:36:52.360 --> 0:36:55.879
<v Speaker 1>likely something that came along with the actual spacecraft and

0:36:55.920 --> 0:36:59.680
<v Speaker 1>not something that was native to the planet. Um. Then

0:36:59.800 --> 0:37:03.640
<v Speaker 1>there is also the worry that you could introduce microbes

0:37:03.760 --> 0:37:09.040
<v Speaker 1>into the uh the biome of a different planet like Mars,

0:37:09.160 --> 0:37:14.200
<v Speaker 1>and they could potentially harm or eradicate any indigenous life forms.

0:37:14.200 --> 0:37:16.640
<v Speaker 1>So there there's we found life on Mars and we

0:37:16.760 --> 0:37:19.960
<v Speaker 1>killed it all. Yeah, which, hey, we got a long

0:37:21.160 --> 0:37:25.000
<v Speaker 1>storied past of that kind of stuff and human history,

0:37:25.520 --> 0:37:28.759
<v Speaker 1>but we would rather not continue that particular part of

0:37:28.760 --> 0:37:33.360
<v Speaker 1>our our development. So that's why the curiosity rover can't

0:37:33.400 --> 0:37:35.919
<v Speaker 1>go and sample this stuff. It would be against the law.

0:37:36.160 --> 0:37:38.920
<v Speaker 1>And and this is going to be a big challenge

0:37:39.040 --> 0:37:43.080
<v Speaker 1>moving forward, this idea of how do we balance finding

0:37:43.200 --> 0:37:47.640
<v Speaker 1>out whether life exists on this planet and the concern

0:37:47.719 --> 0:37:51.640
<v Speaker 1>about contaminating or destroying that life in the process. And

0:37:51.640 --> 0:37:55.520
<v Speaker 1>it's not an easy question to answer. Meanwhile, while we're

0:37:55.520 --> 0:37:59.400
<v Speaker 1>having those discussions, we're also having discussions about colonizing Mars

0:37:59.480 --> 0:38:03.480
<v Speaker 1>and again and human beings big being big old microbe

0:38:03.680 --> 0:38:07.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, clouds. We would have to worry about contamination

0:38:07.520 --> 0:38:10.759
<v Speaker 1>there as well, uh, and you could argue, well, these

0:38:10.760 --> 0:38:15.239
<v Speaker 1>are two separate lines of inquiry that maybe somewhere further

0:38:15.320 --> 0:38:17.480
<v Speaker 1>down the line, we'll we'll have to have them intersect

0:38:17.560 --> 0:38:20.440
<v Speaker 1>so that we can come to what is a satisfying conclusion.

0:38:20.480 --> 0:38:25.879
<v Speaker 1>It may even mean rati amending the treaty, these Outer

0:38:25.920 --> 0:38:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Space Treaty in such a way that we can make

0:38:28.520 --> 0:38:33.080
<v Speaker 1>allowances for certain things like colonization. Um, but I think

0:38:33.080 --> 0:38:35.480
<v Speaker 1>we've got a couple of decades yet to worry about that.

0:38:35.640 --> 0:38:37.719
<v Speaker 1>How unless you're part of Mars one where you are

0:38:37.960 --> 0:38:40.880
<v Speaker 1>convinced that in the next decade you're gonna start launching

0:38:40.920 --> 0:38:43.759
<v Speaker 1>people there, which I think we've pretty much covered as

0:38:43.800 --> 0:38:47.480
<v Speaker 1>being we're highly skeptical of. That is their policy now

0:38:47.640 --> 0:38:51.000
<v Speaker 1>that they will have launched people by a few months ago,

0:38:52.000 --> 0:38:54.840
<v Speaker 1>I think it was actually the launching of people would

0:38:54.840 --> 0:38:59.040
<v Speaker 1>be in the decade um. But I think that they

0:38:59.080 --> 0:39:02.799
<v Speaker 1>would have at least did preparations for launch of some

0:39:02.960 --> 0:39:07.320
<v Speaker 1>of the habitats and other materials. But from why I understand,

0:39:07.320 --> 0:39:12.600
<v Speaker 1>they have raised somewhere less than five thousand dollars, which

0:39:12.680 --> 0:39:17.719
<v Speaker 1>is nothing when it comes to space exploration. UM. So yeah,

0:39:17.800 --> 0:39:20.480
<v Speaker 1>that's that's kind of where we are is. I do

0:39:20.600 --> 0:39:24.360
<v Speaker 1>think it was a pretty exciting announcement. Um. I think

0:39:25.280 --> 0:39:28.200
<v Speaker 1>I think very much like the the lead researcher, I

0:39:28.239 --> 0:39:32.719
<v Speaker 1>think that, uh, the focus has been partially on the

0:39:32.719 --> 0:39:35.520
<v Speaker 1>wrong part of it. Not maybe not wrong. Wrong might

0:39:35.560 --> 0:39:38.000
<v Speaker 1>be the too strong the word to say, but no, no no, no,

0:39:38.080 --> 0:39:42.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean it certainly is important for the implications for life.

0:39:42.200 --> 0:39:45.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it's just people want an answer. Does this

0:39:45.160 --> 0:39:47.839
<v Speaker 1>mean they want to get you to quote to say, yeah,

0:39:47.920 --> 0:39:50.080
<v Speaker 1>there's life on Mars now and it's the it's the

0:39:50.120 --> 0:39:52.560
<v Speaker 1>sexy headline. It's a little bit harder to get the

0:39:52.600 --> 0:39:57.200
<v Speaker 1>common person really excited about salts, so yeah, but it's

0:39:57.320 --> 0:40:02.080
<v Speaker 1>unless they're like caramel Sea salters. Yeah, you know, King

0:40:02.160 --> 0:40:06.239
<v Speaker 1>of Pops. But yeah, no, it's it's it's I I

0:40:06.280 --> 0:40:08.879
<v Speaker 1>think that, uh, that a lot of the focus has

0:40:08.920 --> 0:40:11.120
<v Speaker 1>been more on that life question, which obviously is a

0:40:11.120 --> 0:40:15.399
<v Speaker 1>really big interesting question, um, and not so much on

0:40:16.120 --> 0:40:19.120
<v Speaker 1>how This is yet another example of how science is

0:40:19.120 --> 0:40:23.040
<v Speaker 1>supposed to work. That we make observations, we develop hypotheses,

0:40:23.440 --> 0:40:26.200
<v Speaker 1>We try to make further observations to see if those

0:40:26.239 --> 0:40:30.000
<v Speaker 1>hypotheses are well founded or not. We test that using

0:40:30.000 --> 0:40:34.960
<v Speaker 1>whatever methodology we can. That is reliable, and then we

0:40:35.200 --> 0:40:40.480
<v Speaker 1>continue to refine our ideas. This sort of incremental uh,

0:40:40.719 --> 0:40:44.319
<v Speaker 1>increase and knowledge is incredibly important. It's just not as

0:40:44.360 --> 0:40:48.200
<v Speaker 1>exciting as those breakthrough moments that we tend to associate

0:40:48.840 --> 0:40:54.160
<v Speaker 1>with being you know, important with the capital I write. Yeah,

0:40:54.320 --> 0:40:56.719
<v Speaker 1>To be honest, they very rarely happened. Most of the time.

0:40:57.040 --> 0:41:00.000
<v Speaker 1>It is a series of incremental improvements that ultimately results

0:41:00.040 --> 0:41:02.160
<v Speaker 1>and something that in hindsight you say, oh, here's the

0:41:02.200 --> 0:41:05.040
<v Speaker 1>big breakthrough. But that's not ever or at least very

0:41:05.080 --> 0:41:08.799
<v Speaker 1>rarely the case. Now, one thing we said earlier, you know,

0:41:08.800 --> 0:41:13.200
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned The Martian, which was a novel and now

0:41:13.239 --> 0:41:16.279
<v Speaker 1>a movie obviously with with Matt Damon starring in it,

0:41:16.840 --> 0:41:19.719
<v Speaker 1>uh and Ridley Scott directed it uh and and kind

0:41:19.760 --> 0:41:22.719
<v Speaker 1>of joked about how this whole announcement was just a

0:41:22.760 --> 0:41:27.440
<v Speaker 1>marketing campaign for the film, which I don't obviously really believe.

0:41:27.920 --> 0:41:31.960
<v Speaker 1>But it turns out that uh, director Ridley Scott must

0:41:32.000 --> 0:41:35.759
<v Speaker 1>have like the bat line into NASA, right. Yeah. So

0:41:35.800 --> 0:41:38.239
<v Speaker 1>the research of course has been kicking around in for

0:41:38.280 --> 0:41:40.560
<v Speaker 1>a while. It's been in the works before this paper

0:41:40.600 --> 0:41:45.680
<v Speaker 1>was published, and NASA supposedly showed Ridley Scott these photos

0:41:45.719 --> 0:41:47.879
<v Speaker 1>and talked to him about this evidence like a couple

0:41:47.920 --> 0:41:51.840
<v Speaker 1>of months ago, right around when the excitement about his

0:41:51.880 --> 0:41:56.200
<v Speaker 1>film The Martian started started picking up. But the film

0:41:56.239 --> 0:41:58.800
<v Speaker 1>was already far enough along in production that Scott couldn't

0:41:58.920 --> 0:42:03.359
<v Speaker 1>use the information to to change the course of the film. So, hey,

0:42:03.440 --> 0:42:05.400
<v Speaker 1>that's pretty cool. Like I would like to be a

0:42:05.400 --> 0:42:08.200
<v Speaker 1>film director who gets phone calls from NASA to be like, hey,

0:42:08.320 --> 0:42:10.200
<v Speaker 1>there's this upcoming research. Do you want to use it

0:42:10.239 --> 0:42:12.040
<v Speaker 1>in your movie. I would like to be a non

0:42:12.160 --> 0:42:14.799
<v Speaker 1>film director who gets calls from NASA letting me know

0:42:14.840 --> 0:42:19.799
<v Speaker 1>what the future holds. Would you direct, non film director

0:42:20.000 --> 0:42:22.880
<v Speaker 1>being anything other than a film you, I mean, I'd

0:42:22.880 --> 0:42:27.480
<v Speaker 1>be me just as a non film director, a director

0:42:27.520 --> 0:42:29.680
<v Speaker 1>of things other than films. I'd be a director of

0:42:29.760 --> 0:42:34.520
<v Speaker 1>the FBI. Sir, NASA's on the phone, they say that

0:42:34.560 --> 0:42:38.680
<v Speaker 1>they found h I'm meeting with the cigarette smoking man.

0:42:40.600 --> 0:42:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Uh speaking of conspiracy theories? All right. So, so there

0:42:45.080 --> 0:42:48.759
<v Speaker 1>was this interview with Ridley Scott about the subject in

0:42:48.760 --> 0:42:52.560
<v Speaker 1>The New York Times, and Scott also through in this

0:42:52.640 --> 0:42:58.759
<v Speaker 1>kind of bond Mott about humanity's doom being very soonly forthcoming.

0:42:59.600 --> 0:43:02.560
<v Speaker 1>He stated that he doesn't think that we're going to

0:43:02.680 --> 0:43:06.160
<v Speaker 1>last more than half a century. Um, so we don't

0:43:06.160 --> 0:43:08.839
<v Speaker 1>really so that singularity in that twenty to forty years

0:43:08.840 --> 0:43:11.799
<v Speaker 1>stuff is starting to all sound kind of futile. Now yeah, yeah, so,

0:43:11.880 --> 0:43:13.800
<v Speaker 1>so whether or not there's life on Mars, it doesn't

0:43:13.840 --> 0:43:15.680
<v Speaker 1>matter to us because we're all going to die in

0:43:15.680 --> 0:43:19.319
<v Speaker 1>the next fifty years. And he said, I quote, I'm

0:43:19.360 --> 0:43:22.960
<v Speaker 1>not being pessimistic. I think we've done it. So start

0:43:22.960 --> 0:43:26.960
<v Speaker 1>getting rifles and find some forest retreat up there. Huh

0:43:27.760 --> 0:43:30.799
<v Speaker 1>so interesting, Like he has movies that are set in

0:43:30.840 --> 0:43:32.920
<v Speaker 1>the future, but he doesn't think we'll ever reach a

0:43:32.960 --> 0:43:36.560
<v Speaker 1>future where those movies would ever be where there's science fiction, John,

0:43:36.640 --> 0:43:42.680
<v Speaker 1>I guess so their fantasy there. Yeah? Uh so. Hey, Now,

0:43:43.880 --> 0:43:46.719
<v Speaker 1>has anyone here actually seen the Martian yet film? No? No,

0:43:47.080 --> 0:43:48.800
<v Speaker 1>I haven't seen it either. But I've read the book

0:43:49.600 --> 0:43:51.319
<v Speaker 1>and I have not read the book either. It's a

0:43:51.440 --> 0:43:54.160
<v Speaker 1>very fast read. It's entertaining. I do recommend it. I

0:43:54.200 --> 0:43:56.560
<v Speaker 1>think the science and technology in the book are are

0:43:56.600 --> 0:43:59.960
<v Speaker 1>pretty good. And we'll do an episode. Like I said,

0:44:00.000 --> 0:44:03.520
<v Speaker 1>at talking about what it's funny, you said, pretty good.

0:44:03.560 --> 0:44:06.560
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I've heard people praising that up and down. First,

0:44:06.600 --> 0:44:11.440
<v Speaker 1>there's absolutely like, uh, like abnormal levels of fidelity. I

0:44:11.440 --> 0:44:13.880
<v Speaker 1>would I would agree with that. I would agree it's abnormal.

0:44:14.360 --> 0:44:17.839
<v Speaker 1>That being said, there's there's one thing in particular that

0:44:17.920 --> 0:44:21.520
<v Speaker 1>the writer himself has admitted was a quote unquote hand

0:44:21.560 --> 0:44:27.160
<v Speaker 1>waving gesture to explain away something that was problematic because

0:44:27.239 --> 0:44:31.480
<v Speaker 1>he could not science it. He couldn't science his way

0:44:31.480 --> 0:44:33.000
<v Speaker 1>out of it. And we'll talk about that when we

0:44:33.040 --> 0:44:35.719
<v Speaker 1>do an episode about the Martian and the science and

0:44:35.760 --> 0:44:40.040
<v Speaker 1>technology in it. But overall, yes, the science and in

0:44:40.080 --> 0:44:43.440
<v Speaker 1>that movie and in the book are quite good, and

0:44:43.880 --> 0:44:46.800
<v Speaker 1>they rely on things that exist today, So it doesn't

0:44:47.000 --> 0:44:51.160
<v Speaker 1>require the invention of all new technology. That technology is

0:44:51.200 --> 0:44:53.880
<v Speaker 1>better than what we have today, but it doesn't require

0:44:53.880 --> 0:44:58.920
<v Speaker 1>inventing like the transmogrifire to make everything work. Uh. At

0:44:58.920 --> 0:45:03.160
<v Speaker 1>any rate, Well, we'll talk about that in a future episode. UM,

0:45:03.320 --> 0:45:05.759
<v Speaker 1>hopefully after some of us had a chance to to

0:45:05.800 --> 0:45:09.680
<v Speaker 1>see the movie. Um. I I am looking forward to it.

0:45:09.719 --> 0:45:11.360
<v Speaker 1>The first time I saw a preview for it, it

0:45:11.400 --> 0:45:13.239
<v Speaker 1>convinced me that I had to read the book. So

0:45:13.600 --> 0:45:16.160
<v Speaker 1>I read the book first and now I'm hoping to

0:45:16.200 --> 0:45:19.360
<v Speaker 1>see the movie this week. So at any rate, Water

0:45:19.400 --> 0:45:24.360
<v Speaker 1>on Mars cool information doesn't necessarily mean there is life

0:45:24.640 --> 0:45:27.560
<v Speaker 1>on Mars in any form, doesn't mean there's not either.

0:45:28.040 --> 0:45:30.319
<v Speaker 1>We will have to wait to learn more in the

0:45:30.360 --> 0:45:32.799
<v Speaker 1>future and find a way of doing it so that

0:45:32.840 --> 0:45:37.520
<v Speaker 1>we're not actually destroying what we're looking for in the process.

0:45:37.920 --> 0:45:41.280
<v Speaker 1>And it's it's not an easy solution, Like there's nothing

0:45:42.080 --> 0:45:45.279
<v Speaker 1>that's leaping out at us right now, here's one we

0:45:45.320 --> 0:45:50.399
<v Speaker 1>could sterilize Earth before we send the probe. Yeah, one

0:45:50.440 --> 0:45:52.200
<v Speaker 1>of the things that Joe and I talked about before

0:45:52.200 --> 0:45:53.799
<v Speaker 1>we even came in here was that even if we

0:45:53.840 --> 0:45:57.239
<v Speaker 1>found life on Mars, we wouldn't necessarily know where that

0:45:57.360 --> 0:46:01.359
<v Speaker 1>life originated. I mean, we might, but we wouldn't necessarily

0:46:01.400 --> 0:46:03.799
<v Speaker 1>because we've talked before on the show about the idea

0:46:03.840 --> 0:46:08.960
<v Speaker 1>of the pan spermia hypothesis, the possibility that life on

0:46:09.080 --> 0:46:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Earth and maybe life in other places in the Solar

0:46:11.800 --> 0:46:14.440
<v Speaker 1>System or even other places in the galaxy shares a

0:46:14.520 --> 0:46:18.160
<v Speaker 1>common origin and that it may have been through various

0:46:18.200 --> 0:46:21.840
<v Speaker 1>impact events or something like that traded between different bodies.

0:46:21.880 --> 0:46:25.200
<v Speaker 1>So if you were to go to Mars and find

0:46:25.280 --> 0:46:28.200
<v Speaker 1>something there, let's say you found something there that looked like,

0:46:29.280 --> 0:46:31.840
<v Speaker 1>in some strange way, like a piece of Earth life.

0:46:32.000 --> 0:46:34.680
<v Speaker 1>You know that it had. It was DNA based, It

0:46:34.760 --> 0:46:37.440
<v Speaker 1>was different enough for us to be reasonably certain it

0:46:37.480 --> 0:46:41.400
<v Speaker 1>did not hitch a ride aboard whatever you know, the

0:46:41.560 --> 0:46:45.200
<v Speaker 1>tool we used to discover it on Mars, and yet

0:46:45.800 --> 0:46:48.440
<v Speaker 1>it was similar enough where it appeared there was a

0:46:48.480 --> 0:46:52.400
<v Speaker 1>common ancestor. Yeah. Yeah, And so then I can even imagine,

0:46:52.440 --> 0:46:55.680
<v Speaker 1>though maybe a microbiologist could tell us why this wouldn't

0:46:55.680 --> 0:46:58.000
<v Speaker 1>be the case. I could at least imagine a scenario

0:46:58.640 --> 0:47:00.479
<v Speaker 1>where we would be looking at the U and saying,

0:47:00.920 --> 0:47:04.120
<v Speaker 1>don't know if this hitch deride from Earth, or if

0:47:04.640 --> 0:47:07.440
<v Speaker 1>Earth's life hitched a ride from Mars, or if both

0:47:07.560 --> 0:47:11.600
<v Speaker 1>came from a third source or two separate sources that

0:47:12.040 --> 0:47:16.319
<v Speaker 1>ultimately share a source further back, like this gets super complicated. Uh.

0:47:16.320 --> 0:47:19.600
<v Speaker 1>And now, granted, some of these questions get range from

0:47:19.680 --> 0:47:22.839
<v Speaker 1>science almost into the realm of philosophy, because it may

0:47:23.000 --> 0:47:27.320
<v Speaker 1>turn out that some of them are unanswerable by our

0:47:27.400 --> 0:47:31.120
<v Speaker 1>our methodologies, that we just don't have the capacity to

0:47:31.239 --> 0:47:35.640
<v Speaker 1>go to that level of precision to answer them reasonably.

0:47:36.200 --> 0:47:40.839
<v Speaker 1>But I certainly think it's an interesting thought experiment. And

0:47:41.000 --> 0:47:43.600
<v Speaker 1>of course it's too early to even say anything on

0:47:43.640 --> 0:47:46.719
<v Speaker 1>the subject right now, because we haven't discovered life, any

0:47:47.239 --> 0:47:50.080
<v Speaker 1>evidence of life on Mars, but we will keep looking

0:47:50.280 --> 0:47:53.520
<v Speaker 1>in various ways. And guys, if you guys have any

0:47:53.560 --> 0:47:56.640
<v Speaker 1>suggestions for future topics of forward thinking, maybe something that

0:47:56.719 --> 0:47:59.920
<v Speaker 1>you've always wondered about, or there's a maybe some interesting

0:48:00.040 --> 0:48:02.040
<v Speaker 1>science and in the news that you think we should cover,

0:48:02.520 --> 0:48:04.759
<v Speaker 1>let us know. Send us an email the addresses f

0:48:04.960 --> 0:48:08.680
<v Speaker 1>W Thinking at how Stuff Works dot com, or you

0:48:08.680 --> 0:48:12.520
<v Speaker 1>can drop us a line on Twitter, Google Plus or Facebook.

0:48:12.520 --> 0:48:15.919
<v Speaker 1>At Twitter and Google Plus, we are FW thinking over

0:48:16.000 --> 0:48:18.200
<v Speaker 1>on Facebook, you can just search fw thinking. We will

0:48:18.239 --> 0:48:20.239
<v Speaker 1>pop up there. You can leave us a message and

0:48:20.280 --> 0:48:27.480
<v Speaker 1>we will talk to you again and really soon. For

0:48:27.640 --> 0:48:30.120
<v Speaker 1>more on this topic in the future of technology, I'll

0:48:30.200 --> 0:48:44.120
<v Speaker 1>visit forward Thinking dot com. H brought to you by Toyota.

0:48:44.560 --> 0:48:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Let's go Places,