WEBVTT - Value Investors Must Adapt or Face Failure: Bruce Greenwald

0:00:01.400 --> 0:00:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, along

0:00:04.160 --> 0:00:06.240
<v Speaker 1>with my co host of Bonnie Quinn. Every business day

0:00:06.240 --> 0:00:10.400
<v Speaker 1>we bring you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts,

0:00:10.400 --> 0:00:13.560
<v Speaker 1>along with essential market moving news. Kind a Bloomberg Markets

0:00:13.600 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple podcast or wherever you listen to podcasts,

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:20.239
<v Speaker 1>and on Bloomberg dot Com. Very excited to bring in

0:00:20.280 --> 0:00:23.880
<v Speaker 1>our next guest. Bruce Greenwald is Professor emeritus at Columbia

0:00:23.960 --> 0:00:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Business School. He is, of course famous for his seminal

0:00:27.000 --> 0:00:31.360
<v Speaker 1>book on value investing. He's been teaching so many thousands

0:00:31.480 --> 0:00:35.480
<v Speaker 1>of students about value investing during his days at Columbia

0:00:35.560 --> 0:00:38.559
<v Speaker 1>over the past several decades, me being one of them.

0:00:38.600 --> 0:00:42.239
<v Speaker 1>I remember very difficult days poring over the book of

0:00:42.280 --> 0:00:44.720
<v Speaker 1>case studies that Bruce Greenwald used to hand out. But

0:00:44.880 --> 0:00:47.720
<v Speaker 1>excited that he's back on for a fully updated edition

0:00:47.840 --> 0:00:51.280
<v Speaker 1>of the seminal book Value Investing from Graham to Boot

0:00:51.440 --> 0:00:54.680
<v Speaker 1>and beyond. So Bruce, welcome, Very great to have you

0:00:54.720 --> 0:00:57.760
<v Speaker 1>on the program. It's been a rough decade for value investing,

0:00:57.760 --> 0:00:59.680
<v Speaker 1>of course, but there was a little bit of talk

0:00:59.680 --> 0:01:03.080
<v Speaker 1>recently that we might be heading into the value cycle again.

0:01:03.120 --> 0:01:05.679
<v Speaker 1>What did you make of all of that. Look, I think,

0:01:06.160 --> 0:01:08.360
<v Speaker 1>let me first say, Vanni, it's a real pleasure to

0:01:08.400 --> 0:01:13.720
<v Speaker 1>talk to YouTube after so many years. The fact of

0:01:13.720 --> 0:01:16.360
<v Speaker 1>the matter is that I think, in contrast to what

0:01:16.520 --> 0:01:20.319
<v Speaker 1>happened in the tech boom at the end of the nineties,

0:01:20.760 --> 0:01:24.360
<v Speaker 1>there are fundamental changes in the economy that have taken place.

0:01:24.840 --> 0:01:28.200
<v Speaker 1>So even though the basic value principles are still going

0:01:28.240 --> 0:01:30.560
<v Speaker 1>to be there, which is, you want to look intelligently

0:01:31.000 --> 0:01:34.920
<v Speaker 1>for opportunities where you're more likely to be better positioned

0:01:34.959 --> 0:01:37.080
<v Speaker 1>than the other side of the trade. You want to

0:01:37.120 --> 0:01:39.520
<v Speaker 1>know the value of what you're buying, and you want

0:01:39.520 --> 0:01:42.840
<v Speaker 1>to be disciplined. The changes in the world means you're

0:01:42.880 --> 0:01:45.759
<v Speaker 1>going to have to apply them differently, and I think

0:01:45.800 --> 0:01:50.200
<v Speaker 1>if value investors don't adapt, there may be short periods

0:01:50.240 --> 0:01:52.680
<v Speaker 1>when they do well, but I don't think for the

0:01:52.760 --> 0:01:55.560
<v Speaker 1>long term they're they're going to have the kinds of

0:01:56.560 --> 0:02:00.640
<v Speaker 1>records that they historically had. So, Professor, what types of

0:02:00.680 --> 0:02:04.160
<v Speaker 1>adaptations do you think investors should take to the extent

0:02:04.200 --> 0:02:07.440
<v Speaker 1>that they really want to pursue value investing. Well, okay,

0:02:07.480 --> 0:02:11.240
<v Speaker 1>so let's actually start with just what it is that's changed.

0:02:11.280 --> 0:02:14.080
<v Speaker 1>So you have an idea of what you're adapting to.

0:02:14.720 --> 0:02:18.840
<v Speaker 1>And there are two dominant trends in the global economy

0:02:18.880 --> 0:02:23.200
<v Speaker 1>that affect investors. The first is manufacturing is dying and

0:02:23.240 --> 0:02:26.520
<v Speaker 1>we're becoming a service economy, which means we're going from

0:02:26.639 --> 0:02:32.800
<v Speaker 1>big centralized manufacturing facilities to very dispersed service facilities. And

0:02:32.880 --> 0:02:35.080
<v Speaker 1>the second thing is, and this really amounts to the

0:02:35.160 --> 0:02:41.399
<v Speaker 1>same thing tchech has basically disaggregated organizations. So you see

0:02:41.440 --> 0:02:44.200
<v Speaker 1>it in the way that people work separately, which is

0:02:44.240 --> 0:02:46.320
<v Speaker 1>the gig economy, but you also see it in the

0:02:46.360 --> 0:02:50.400
<v Speaker 1>way in which organizations are separated out. So in the

0:02:50.440 --> 0:02:54.799
<v Speaker 1>old days, if you are doing I t IBM did everything.

0:02:55.520 --> 0:02:58.320
<v Speaker 1>If you look at it today, you know Microsoft does

0:02:58.360 --> 0:03:03.240
<v Speaker 1>the operating system and basic functions, or Echo does the databases,

0:03:03.520 --> 0:03:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Google does search, Intel does only the CPU chips, and

0:03:07.760 --> 0:03:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Facebook does the interactions. So you're really going from large

0:03:13.320 --> 0:03:18.800
<v Speaker 1>centralized organizations to really very decentralized one and that has

0:03:18.919 --> 0:03:24.919
<v Speaker 1>three absolutely critical consequences. The first is that productivity growth

0:03:25.000 --> 0:03:29.919
<v Speaker 1>is currently much harder on a decentralized basis, So going forward,

0:03:29.960 --> 0:03:32.560
<v Speaker 1>you're not going to see the rate of improvement in

0:03:32.639 --> 0:03:35.960
<v Speaker 1>productivity that you saw in the path. Although we're big

0:03:36.080 --> 0:03:39.960
<v Speaker 1>organizations like McDonald's in the US learn to do it.

0:03:40.360 --> 0:03:42.400
<v Speaker 1>We're going to do probably in the US better than

0:03:42.440 --> 0:03:46.400
<v Speaker 1>other people. Second thing is when people work individually they

0:03:46.440 --> 0:03:50.120
<v Speaker 1>get paid for what they do. They don't get paid

0:03:50.160 --> 0:03:53.240
<v Speaker 1>the average wage, and that means that the distribution of

0:03:53.280 --> 0:03:57.800
<v Speaker 1>income becomes much much more unequal, and that's going to continue.

0:03:58.520 --> 0:04:01.000
<v Speaker 1>And I think the third thing, which is really what's

0:04:01.040 --> 0:04:04.720
<v Speaker 1>crucial for value investors, is that you are moving from

0:04:05.080 --> 0:04:09.320
<v Speaker 1>broad global markets, the gms, the gas of the world,

0:04:09.680 --> 0:04:15.960
<v Speaker 1>to niche local markets. And big global markets are competitive

0:04:17.200 --> 0:04:20.240
<v Speaker 1>small niche market I mean, for example, if you're gonna

0:04:20.279 --> 0:04:23.359
<v Speaker 1>be viable at one percent market share, you're never going

0:04:23.400 --> 0:04:26.720
<v Speaker 1>to keep anybody out of those big global markets, whereas

0:04:26.800 --> 0:04:32.200
<v Speaker 1>small local markets are markets in which dominant competitors can

0:04:32.360 --> 0:04:37.560
<v Speaker 1>enjoy barriers to entry based on economies of scale. And

0:04:37.760 --> 0:04:42.320
<v Speaker 1>once that happens, once you've got these what Buffett refers

0:04:42.320 --> 0:04:46.520
<v Speaker 1>to a franchise businesses, the whole investment world changes. So

0:04:46.600 --> 0:04:52.800
<v Speaker 1>you have high returns on investment capital. So capital allocation

0:04:52.960 --> 0:04:56.880
<v Speaker 1>can be hugely value creating as well as value destructive.

0:04:57.600 --> 0:05:00.760
<v Speaker 1>You benefit from organic growth and revenue. I mean, if

0:05:00.800 --> 0:05:05.640
<v Speaker 1>you're in a competitive market and revenue grows organically. Temporarily

0:05:05.720 --> 0:05:08.760
<v Speaker 1>profits may go up, but then everybody enters and they

0:05:08.800 --> 0:05:13.000
<v Speaker 1>just divide the business more finally, and the profits go away.

0:05:13.560 --> 0:05:17.200
<v Speaker 1>And the same thing happens with the benefit of tech

0:05:17.240 --> 0:05:21.960
<v Speaker 1>based margin growth, you know, is productivity goes up. In

0:05:22.040 --> 0:05:25.560
<v Speaker 1>a competitive market, everybody rushes in. But if you benefit

0:05:25.880 --> 0:05:29.599
<v Speaker 1>from barriers to entry, you get to enjoy that. And

0:05:29.680 --> 0:05:32.159
<v Speaker 1>you see that, by the way, and what's happened to profits.

0:05:32.720 --> 0:05:35.680
<v Speaker 1>In the early in the late eighties early nineties, profits

0:05:35.680 --> 0:05:40.680
<v Speaker 1>were eight of national income. Today they're twelve to cent

0:05:40.800 --> 0:05:44.560
<v Speaker 1>or higher, and they're probably going up. But here is

0:05:44.600 --> 0:05:50.960
<v Speaker 1>the critical thing. Old fashioned asset based value investing is

0:05:51.080 --> 0:05:53.560
<v Speaker 1>not going to do it for you. It's too small

0:05:53.600 --> 0:05:57.560
<v Speaker 1>a part of the overall picture that assets aren't that

0:05:57.720 --> 0:06:01.479
<v Speaker 1>important in a world where has got barriers to entry

0:06:01.800 --> 0:06:04.840
<v Speaker 1>and franchise businesses, and there by the way, where you've

0:06:04.880 --> 0:06:08.679
<v Speaker 1>got services and intangible assets, they're much harder to measure.

0:06:09.279 --> 0:06:12.160
<v Speaker 1>So I think the first thing investors have to do

0:06:12.600 --> 0:06:16.200
<v Speaker 1>is understand franchise businesses. Interesting case where we almost have

0:06:16.279 --> 0:06:17.719
<v Speaker 1>a time, but I do want to get in one

0:06:17.720 --> 0:06:19.760
<v Speaker 1>more question. If you talk to the likes of Joel

0:06:19.800 --> 0:06:22.680
<v Speaker 1>greenbatt or Richard Bosina or Bill Miller, you'll come away

0:06:22.680 --> 0:06:26.880
<v Speaker 1>with a very different style of value investing. A piece. Well,

0:06:26.880 --> 0:06:30.880
<v Speaker 1>what distinguishes all of these different styles of value investing? Well,

0:06:30.960 --> 0:06:33.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that they are as I say, there

0:06:33.640 --> 0:06:38.240
<v Speaker 1>are three fundamental things that they all do. I think that,

0:06:38.880 --> 0:06:43.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, the crucial difference between traditional value investors and

0:06:43.520 --> 0:06:47.080
<v Speaker 1>them is that they've actually adapted much better, that they

0:06:47.160 --> 0:06:51.680
<v Speaker 1>understand that growth creates value in this world, and you

0:06:51.839 --> 0:06:56.839
<v Speaker 1>can't invest and look for value without understanding how to

0:06:56.880 --> 0:06:59.760
<v Speaker 1>put value on growth. And I think that is the

0:07:00.000 --> 0:07:05.239
<v Speaker 1>single overwhelming style difference. And I think, frankly the future

0:07:05.320 --> 0:07:08.760
<v Speaker 1>lies with the Bill Millers and the Joel Green plots

0:07:08.800 --> 0:07:11.000
<v Speaker 1>for the world. And in fact, what the book is

0:07:11.040 --> 0:07:15.240
<v Speaker 1>really about is about adapting to this new environment where

0:07:15.240 --> 0:07:19.400
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, the historical distinction between growth investing

0:07:19.800 --> 0:07:23.520
<v Speaker 1>what you would call varieties of value investing and traditional

0:07:23.640 --> 0:07:29.440
<v Speaker 1>sort of cigar but asset has gone away. A Bruce,

0:07:29.600 --> 0:07:32.760
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining us there. Bruce Bruce Greenwald,

0:07:32.800 --> 0:07:36.640
<v Speaker 1>Professor Emeritus at Columbia Business School, Chairman of the Paradigm

0:07:36.640 --> 0:07:39.760
<v Speaker 1>Capital Management, and senior advisor at First Eagle investment manager

0:07:40.000 --> 0:07:43.680
<v Speaker 1>and of course author of the book Value Investing From

0:07:43.720 --> 0:07:47.600
<v Speaker 1>Graham to Buffett and beyond. We always appreciate listening to

0:07:48.200 --> 0:07:51.160
<v Speaker 1>the thoughts of Professor Greenwald. I think about value investing.

0:07:51.160 --> 0:07:55.200
<v Speaker 1>It's really been challenging in this market where growth has

0:07:55.240 --> 0:07:59.120
<v Speaker 1>really been the dominant theme really for a couple of decades.

0:07:59.240 --> 0:08:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Right now and at this time now to take a

0:08:04.280 --> 0:08:07.880
<v Speaker 1>look at the credit markets and maybe the markets more broadly,

0:08:07.920 --> 0:08:09.800
<v Speaker 1>let's bring in MinC you count on Depine, chief investment

0:08:09.800 --> 0:08:12.679
<v Speaker 1>officer of Western Asset Management. I say the credit markets

0:08:12.720 --> 0:08:14.960
<v Speaker 1>because they're top of mind today, Mike, what with a

0:08:15.160 --> 0:08:17.320
<v Speaker 1>MC being in a little bit of trouble. We know

0:08:17.360 --> 0:08:20.480
<v Speaker 1>that the movie theaters have already tapped all the credit

0:08:20.560 --> 0:08:24.360
<v Speaker 1>that possibly is available to them, except for private individuals

0:08:24.360 --> 0:08:27.120
<v Speaker 1>that are looking to do that. And just curious as

0:08:27.120 --> 0:08:31.080
<v Speaker 1>to where you see the credit markets right now, Well,

0:08:31.120 --> 0:08:34.320
<v Speaker 1>there's no question and by the way, Vanni and Paul,

0:08:34.360 --> 0:08:37.280
<v Speaker 1>thank you for having me on UM. There's no no

0:08:37.360 --> 0:08:41.240
<v Speaker 1>question that UM, there is still stress in the credit market.

0:08:41.320 --> 0:08:45.520
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned amc Um. There's a lot of companies, there's

0:08:45.520 --> 0:08:49.319
<v Speaker 1>a lot of industries that have done pretty much everything

0:08:49.360 --> 0:08:53.679
<v Speaker 1>they possibly could to survive to this point, UM, some

0:08:53.760 --> 0:08:55.640
<v Speaker 1>aren't going to make it, and you actually see that

0:08:55.720 --> 0:08:59.640
<v Speaker 1>in the default numbers. UM. I think many because the

0:08:59.679 --> 0:09:03.120
<v Speaker 1>capital will markets up so quickly back in late March

0:09:03.160 --> 0:09:06.320
<v Speaker 1>and early April UH, some were able to access that

0:09:06.400 --> 0:09:10.600
<v Speaker 1>rescue financing and even though they paid dearly for doing that. UM.

0:09:10.640 --> 0:09:12.920
<v Speaker 1>I think it's going to be a wise move on

0:09:12.960 --> 0:09:18.800
<v Speaker 1>their part, and UM will at least minimize how many

0:09:18.840 --> 0:09:23.920
<v Speaker 1>of these companies actually had to ultimately restructure or or

0:09:24.080 --> 0:09:27.080
<v Speaker 1>file so UM. I think the credit markets right now,

0:09:27.200 --> 0:09:30.760
<v Speaker 1>there's no question that some of the rally that we

0:09:30.760 --> 0:09:34.280
<v Speaker 1>were expecting to occur in two thousand one, some of

0:09:34.280 --> 0:09:38.400
<v Speaker 1>that has been pulled forward into two thousand twenty, just

0:09:38.440 --> 0:09:42.120
<v Speaker 1>with clarity on the vaccine. UM. I think everyone's expecting

0:09:42.120 --> 0:09:46.000
<v Speaker 1>as we are bouncing growth, a bouncing earnings UM. But

0:09:46.080 --> 0:09:49.680
<v Speaker 1>that being said, I still think the credit markets have

0:09:49.960 --> 0:09:53.040
<v Speaker 1>room for performance as we move forward over the next

0:09:53.040 --> 0:09:56.080
<v Speaker 1>few quarters, probably going to be more of a focus

0:09:56.120 --> 0:09:59.880
<v Speaker 1>on income, focus on carry trade versus what we've seen

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:02.040
<v Speaker 1>over the last two or three quarters, which has really

0:10:02.080 --> 0:10:05.480
<v Speaker 1>been you know about capital appreciation and spread tightening. I

0:10:05.480 --> 0:10:09.720
<v Speaker 1>think the magnitude of that spread tightening is probably behind

0:10:09.840 --> 0:10:14.440
<v Speaker 1>us but but still opportunity UM in fixed income resectors

0:10:15.000 --> 0:10:19.560
<v Speaker 1>broadly and UM in particular in credit. So, Mike, you

0:10:19.559 --> 0:10:22.880
<v Speaker 1>talked about some performance maybe being brought forward a little

0:10:22.920 --> 0:10:25.400
<v Speaker 1>bit here in let's talk about high yield. Is there

0:10:25.440 --> 0:10:29.000
<v Speaker 1>any value left in high yield? It's amazing to me,

0:10:29.520 --> 0:10:32.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, how well that market has performed, given some

0:10:32.280 --> 0:10:34.200
<v Speaker 1>of the potential credit risks out there that are are

0:10:34.440 --> 0:10:39.120
<v Speaker 1>quite likely, you know, even going well into Yeah, it

0:10:39.280 --> 0:10:41.480
<v Speaker 1>is surprising. And if you just think about where we

0:10:41.480 --> 0:10:45.360
<v Speaker 1>were uh in the depths of March and into early April,

0:10:45.400 --> 0:10:48.080
<v Speaker 1>and you know, now high yields up over six percent

0:10:48.280 --> 0:10:51.280
<v Speaker 1>year to date. UM. But I would say this, there's

0:10:51.320 --> 0:10:54.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of disparity in high yield UM. If you

0:10:54.600 --> 0:10:57.800
<v Speaker 1>look at you know, just even by rating category UH,

0:10:57.920 --> 0:11:00.920
<v Speaker 1>double B high quality is doing very well, you know,

0:11:01.040 --> 0:11:04.440
<v Speaker 1>up nine and a half percent, triple CS uh. You know,

0:11:04.480 --> 0:11:07.959
<v Speaker 1>just think of the lowest quality within high yield UH

0:11:08.360 --> 0:11:11.360
<v Speaker 1>just up over a little over four percent year to date,

0:11:11.600 --> 0:11:15.480
<v Speaker 1>and then take that even further UM by industry energy

0:11:16.120 --> 0:11:19.240
<v Speaker 1>is negative still two percent year to date. UM. So

0:11:19.320 --> 0:11:22.160
<v Speaker 1>there is a lot of disparity within the high yield market.

0:11:22.679 --> 0:11:25.400
<v Speaker 1>And yes, we do still think there are opportunity. I

0:11:25.440 --> 0:11:27.840
<v Speaker 1>think it's um. You know, again, if you go back

0:11:27.880 --> 0:11:31.160
<v Speaker 1>to late March and early April, it was really just

0:11:31.559 --> 0:11:36.160
<v Speaker 1>get risk in high yield. Clearly the downside had overshot

0:11:36.200 --> 0:11:38.880
<v Speaker 1>and you just want to capitalize on that trade. I

0:11:38.920 --> 0:11:42.360
<v Speaker 1>think going forward you're gonna see, um, just just a

0:11:42.360 --> 0:11:46.640
<v Speaker 1>lot more disparity or um, you know, just different markets

0:11:46.800 --> 0:11:49.520
<v Speaker 1>out performing in different markets under performing. So I think

0:11:49.520 --> 0:11:52.280
<v Speaker 1>it's really gonna end up being you know, you got

0:11:52.280 --> 0:11:54.760
<v Speaker 1>to pick the right credits, you gotta pick the right industries,

0:11:54.800 --> 0:12:00.200
<v Speaker 1>really focus on bottom up discipline, fundamental research. Um. So.

0:12:00.280 --> 0:12:04.400
<v Speaker 1>I I do think that's there's opportunity there. Um. But again,

0:12:04.559 --> 0:12:06.679
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's going to be as obvious, and

0:12:06.720 --> 0:12:08.480
<v Speaker 1>I think it's gonna take a little more work to

0:12:08.559 --> 0:12:11.800
<v Speaker 1>identify those trades. That said, we're not getting any new

0:12:11.840 --> 0:12:14.120
<v Speaker 1>stimulus that we know of. Yes, I mean maybe it

0:12:14.120 --> 0:12:16.880
<v Speaker 1>will happen, but we don't know how that will impact businesses.

0:12:17.440 --> 0:12:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Surely there's going to be another round of bankruptcy, is Mike, Um,

0:12:23.280 --> 0:12:25.720
<v Speaker 1>I do think. I mean, I don't think there's going

0:12:25.760 --> 0:12:29.840
<v Speaker 1>to be an elevated spike of bankruptcies. UM. I think

0:12:30.600 --> 0:12:34.080
<v Speaker 1>we know or at least have a reasonable idea of

0:12:34.160 --> 0:12:38.040
<v Speaker 1>which companies are on the verge of having to file UM.

0:12:38.080 --> 0:12:40.240
<v Speaker 1>If you look at trading levels, I think the market

0:12:40.240 --> 0:12:43.520
<v Speaker 1>does a pretty good job of identifying those credits, and

0:12:43.559 --> 0:12:48.440
<v Speaker 1>they tend to trade it very stressed or distressed prices. UM.

0:12:48.559 --> 0:12:50.720
<v Speaker 1>I only I think the only way that we would

0:12:50.720 --> 0:12:53.920
<v Speaker 1>get UM sort of a new flare up, if you will,

0:12:54.080 --> 0:12:58.200
<v Speaker 1>or another round of defaults or bankruptcies, is if we

0:12:58.280 --> 0:13:02.400
<v Speaker 1>had disappointment on the vaccine. I think between now and

0:13:02.480 --> 0:13:06.720
<v Speaker 1>when we expect the vaccine to make its way into

0:13:06.880 --> 0:13:09.480
<v Speaker 1>the broad population, let's call that maybe over the next

0:13:09.520 --> 0:13:14.760
<v Speaker 1>two quarters. UM. I think the market is is expecting that.

0:13:14.880 --> 0:13:18.280
<v Speaker 1>I think the liquidity and on most of the balance

0:13:18.320 --> 0:13:20.760
<v Speaker 1>sheets of companies that are in the high old market

0:13:21.240 --> 0:13:24.520
<v Speaker 1>is sufficient to get to that point. However, again, if

0:13:24.520 --> 0:13:29.160
<v Speaker 1>we had disappointment and UM, you know that vaccine wasn't

0:13:29.160 --> 0:13:33.480
<v Speaker 1>as successful or the vaccines aren't as successful, and this

0:13:33.600 --> 0:13:36.240
<v Speaker 1>extends into the latter part of two thousand twenty one,

0:13:36.559 --> 0:13:38.559
<v Speaker 1>I do think then you know you're you're you're going

0:13:38.640 --> 0:13:40.880
<v Speaker 1>to see some more vulnerabilities. You're going to see some

0:13:40.920 --> 0:13:45.240
<v Speaker 1>of these at risk sectors and at risk companies either

0:13:45.320 --> 0:13:49.360
<v Speaker 1>have to get another round of secured financing, or perhaps,

0:13:49.360 --> 0:13:52.240
<v Speaker 1>as you alluded to, UM, have to to restructure. But

0:13:52.520 --> 0:13:55.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that's in our base case. Hey Mike,

0:13:55.320 --> 0:13:59.839
<v Speaker 1>what's uh, what's your thoughts on Janet Yelling as by

0:13:59.840 --> 0:14:04.679
<v Speaker 1>the Treasury Secretary nominee. Yeah, I think that was a

0:14:04.760 --> 0:14:09.960
<v Speaker 1>wise choice. UM, definitely calming to the markets. UM. You know,

0:14:10.000 --> 0:14:13.760
<v Speaker 1>even saw uh Larry Cudlow comment on that, and you

0:14:13.760 --> 0:14:16.880
<v Speaker 1>know he's one of the few from the Trump administration

0:14:16.960 --> 0:14:20.320
<v Speaker 1>to say anything, but clearly, I mean Janet Yell, you know,

0:14:20.560 --> 0:14:24.560
<v Speaker 1>sensible views on the economy as a former FED chair. Um.

0:14:24.800 --> 0:14:26.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think there's a certain level of comfort

0:14:26.840 --> 0:14:30.800
<v Speaker 1>in the market knowing that she understands the cohesion that's

0:14:30.880 --> 0:14:35.520
<v Speaker 1>necessary between between Fed and White House policy. UM. So

0:14:35.560 --> 0:14:37.400
<v Speaker 1>I think that was a wise choice and I think

0:14:37.600 --> 0:14:44.600
<v Speaker 1>definitely UM was was calming to the markets. So Michael,

0:14:44.640 --> 0:14:46.560
<v Speaker 1>will you be looking out now through year end? Are

0:14:46.600 --> 0:14:50.800
<v Speaker 1>we going to see this Santa calus while I continue? Yeah,

0:14:50.840 --> 0:14:54.000
<v Speaker 1>I think you know the new issue volume that m

0:14:54.360 --> 0:14:57.440
<v Speaker 1>in both the investment grade market and the high old market.

0:14:57.760 --> 0:14:59.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, those are two records. There's just an extra

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:03.040
<v Speaker 1>ainary amount of new issuance UM. Now, a lot of

0:15:03.080 --> 0:15:06.200
<v Speaker 1>that was for refinancing, which I think is a good thing.

0:15:06.240 --> 0:15:09.400
<v Speaker 1>If you're a lender UM and you want to uh

0:15:09.600 --> 0:15:14.760
<v Speaker 1>classify new issuance into something that's either bondholder friendly or

0:15:14.800 --> 0:15:19.120
<v Speaker 1>bondholder not friendly, we'd obviously rather see more friendly purposes,

0:15:19.120 --> 0:15:22.800
<v Speaker 1>which we would call refinancing. Is definitely a friend friendly

0:15:22.920 --> 0:15:26.200
<v Speaker 1>use of proceeds UM. But clearly you're going to see

0:15:26.200 --> 0:15:29.040
<v Speaker 1>a slowdown in new issue volume over the next couple

0:15:29.040 --> 0:15:33.240
<v Speaker 1>of weeks. Um money continues to come into these markets,

0:15:33.240 --> 0:15:36.480
<v Speaker 1>both investment grade and high yield have seen uh you know,

0:15:36.520 --> 0:15:40.600
<v Speaker 1>an extraordinary amount of flows into both institutional as well

0:15:40.640 --> 0:15:44.520
<v Speaker 1>as retail funds, So, you know, good technical backdrop from

0:15:44.520 --> 0:15:47.960
<v Speaker 1>that perspective. More money continuing to come in, uh, you know,

0:15:48.520 --> 0:15:52.280
<v Speaker 1>less new issue should result in at least stable spreads

0:15:52.280 --> 0:15:54.960
<v Speaker 1>and stable markets. In my opinion, Hey, Mike, thanks so

0:15:55.040 --> 0:15:57.480
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us. We really appreciate your thoughts. Might

0:15:57.520 --> 0:16:01.200
<v Speaker 1>be Cannon, Deputy Chief investment officer for Western Asset Management

0:16:01.400 --> 0:16:05.360
<v Speaker 1>based out in Pasadena, California, really giving us their thoughts

0:16:05.480 --> 0:16:11.000
<v Speaker 1>on the fixed income markets. Again, new issuance all time high. Well,

0:16:11.000 --> 0:16:14.160
<v Speaker 1>we have seen several shots now of nurses critical care

0:16:14.160 --> 0:16:18.560
<v Speaker 1>and nurses getting their first adviser beyond take shots. So

0:16:18.600 --> 0:16:22.320
<v Speaker 1>the first vaccines are out there. Let's get straight to

0:16:22.360 --> 0:16:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Bob Landgrath, who is a Bloomberg healthcare reporter here for

0:16:25.360 --> 0:16:29.240
<v Speaker 1>us on this rollout. So deaths are approaching three hundred

0:16:29.320 --> 0:16:33.000
<v Speaker 1>thousand and continuing to rise. Bob, how fast can the

0:16:33.040 --> 0:16:36.200
<v Speaker 1>distribution network get this vaccine out to where it needs

0:16:36.200 --> 0:16:39.320
<v Speaker 1>to be? Oh? Yeah, no, this is going to take

0:16:39.360 --> 0:16:41.360
<v Speaker 1>a while. This is a long slow process. And you

0:16:41.400 --> 0:16:45.000
<v Speaker 1>mentioned the gas approaching three hundred thousand. Unfortunately, those deaths

0:16:45.000 --> 0:16:47.160
<v Speaker 1>are going to continue to increase because many of them

0:16:47.160 --> 0:16:49.640
<v Speaker 1>are essentially you know, they're based on people who have

0:16:49.680 --> 0:16:52.600
<v Speaker 1>already been infected weeks ago. So the numbers want to

0:16:52.600 --> 0:16:56.800
<v Speaker 1>continue to to go to to go up, to go

0:16:56.920 --> 0:16:58.280
<v Speaker 1>up in the terms of the guests for a few

0:16:58.280 --> 0:17:02.320
<v Speaker 1>weeks because the number of vaccines that are available, you know,

0:17:02.360 --> 0:17:04.040
<v Speaker 1>that's just not going to make you a big impact

0:17:04.119 --> 0:17:05.880
<v Speaker 1>on death for a while to come. But it's very

0:17:05.880 --> 0:17:09.159
<v Speaker 1>important to get this rollout going absolutely, and the people

0:17:09.200 --> 0:17:15.080
<v Speaker 1>that are being vaccinated now are you know, healthcare workers

0:17:15.240 --> 0:17:17.840
<v Speaker 1>and then the nursing home residents as small fraction of

0:17:17.880 --> 0:17:21.000
<v Speaker 1>the population those are kind of the priority people that

0:17:21.040 --> 0:17:23.399
<v Speaker 1>haven't decided that will get it first, because you know,

0:17:23.400 --> 0:17:25.639
<v Speaker 1>they're on the front lines. And in terms of the

0:17:25.640 --> 0:17:28.119
<v Speaker 1>healthcare workers, and then the nursing home residents obviously have

0:17:28.240 --> 0:17:31.119
<v Speaker 1>some of the highest death rates and account for a

0:17:31.200 --> 0:17:34.359
<v Speaker 1>large percentage of the death toll in the United States.

0:17:34.359 --> 0:17:36.760
<v Speaker 1>So right now there's in this initial way there's only

0:17:36.760 --> 0:17:39.680
<v Speaker 1>two point nine million doses available, so that's a very

0:17:39.720 --> 0:17:44.640
<v Speaker 1>small faction of even healthcare workers uh and uh uh

0:17:44.840 --> 0:17:46.880
<v Speaker 1>nursing home residents, and and then the next week there's

0:17:46.880 --> 0:17:48.400
<v Speaker 1>only more. In the week after that's gonna be more,

0:17:48.440 --> 0:17:50.520
<v Speaker 1>and hopefully by the end of this week will get

0:17:50.520 --> 0:17:53.480
<v Speaker 1>the moderna vaccine as well, not you approximately double the

0:17:53.560 --> 0:17:57.080
<v Speaker 1>number of doses you know, available per week. Uh, So

0:17:57.280 --> 0:17:59.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, it is starting to roll out. As people

0:17:59.359 --> 0:18:01.280
<v Speaker 1>have said, this is kind of the who we hope

0:18:01.280 --> 0:18:02.920
<v Speaker 1>this is the beginning of the end, but still only

0:18:02.960 --> 0:18:04.679
<v Speaker 1>the beginning, and it's going to take a while, and

0:18:04.760 --> 0:18:08.000
<v Speaker 1>that's very important. People still should take precautions until we

0:18:08.000 --> 0:18:10.720
<v Speaker 1>get to this difficult period right now and much larger

0:18:10.720 --> 0:18:14.840
<v Speaker 1>percentage of population is able to be vaccinated. Dr Faucci

0:18:15.160 --> 0:18:19.280
<v Speaker 1>just now on MSNBC says Americans with no underlying conditions

0:18:19.280 --> 0:18:21.879
<v Speaker 1>should get the vaccines at the end of March or

0:18:21.920 --> 0:18:25.040
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of April can according to Dr Fauci, just

0:18:25.080 --> 0:18:30.439
<v Speaker 1>now an MSNBC. UM, So interesting, Bob, what do we

0:18:30.480 --> 0:18:33.560
<v Speaker 1>know about the MODERNA drug again? It we It looks

0:18:33.560 --> 0:18:35.520
<v Speaker 1>like they're going to be just a week behind Fiser.

0:18:35.600 --> 0:18:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Get the approval Thursday, I guess, and then maybe start

0:18:39.160 --> 0:18:40.680
<v Speaker 1>rolling it out over the weekend like we just saw

0:18:40.800 --> 0:18:43.600
<v Speaker 1>with Fiser. Is there any reason to believe that Moddarian

0:18:43.640 --> 0:18:48.080
<v Speaker 1>will run into any roadbox. No, there are actually no

0:18:48.160 --> 0:18:50.880
<v Speaker 1>reason to believe I'm the Durnal run into any load box.

0:18:50.960 --> 0:18:53.920
<v Speaker 1>It's actually a very similar vaccine to the Fiser vaccine

0:18:53.960 --> 0:18:57.200
<v Speaker 1>that they're both based on this messenger RNA technology. It's

0:18:57.200 --> 0:18:59.480
<v Speaker 1>a new technology. It turns out to work be working

0:18:59.640 --> 0:19:02.720
<v Speaker 1>very well against the coronavirus U. Both of these vaccines

0:19:02.760 --> 0:19:07.080
<v Speaker 1>about efficacy rate, uh, and so this is very similar.

0:19:07.160 --> 0:19:09.800
<v Speaker 1>So you know, unless there's some surprises, Yeah, this should

0:19:09.840 --> 0:19:12.520
<v Speaker 1>should roll out around, start rolling out around and say Friday,

0:19:12.640 --> 0:19:15.760
<v Speaker 1>unless there's some showstopp or surprise. We don't don't know

0:19:15.800 --> 0:19:17.960
<v Speaker 1>about that. That's that's the very good news. You know

0:19:18.000 --> 0:19:19.920
<v Speaker 1>that the bad news is that both of these because

0:19:19.960 --> 0:19:23.879
<v Speaker 1>they're a new technology, isn't the manufacturing experience, and they

0:19:23.960 --> 0:19:27.199
<v Speaker 1>have to make this enormous quantities and these factories are

0:19:27.240 --> 0:19:29.920
<v Speaker 1>still current just gearing up now and that's why you're

0:19:29.960 --> 0:19:31.919
<v Speaker 1>at first for the first few months, there's definitely, you know,

0:19:32.000 --> 0:19:33.879
<v Speaker 1>going to be a shortage of vaccine to go around.

0:19:34.560 --> 0:19:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Can you give us some idea of the supply chain

0:19:37.000 --> 0:19:39.400
<v Speaker 1>and how it works and how you know a vaccine

0:19:39.400 --> 0:19:44.320
<v Speaker 1>gets from a factory to a hospital. Yeah, there are

0:19:44.359 --> 0:19:48.520
<v Speaker 1>several steps involved, and there's distribution hubs and UH. I

0:19:48.600 --> 0:19:51.560
<v Speaker 1>know that UPS and set X are involved and helping

0:19:51.600 --> 0:19:56.520
<v Speaker 1>ship uh the the Friser vaccine UH to to the

0:19:56.600 --> 0:19:59.160
<v Speaker 1>right places where it's needed. Uh. It's a very complicated

0:19:59.160 --> 0:20:02.280
<v Speaker 1>supply chain. Those governments monitoring it very closely. Once it

0:20:02.320 --> 0:20:06.320
<v Speaker 1>gets into individual states and locations, then it's more the

0:20:06.320 --> 0:20:10.520
<v Speaker 1>responsibility of the local states and hospital change to distribute

0:20:10.560 --> 0:20:12.800
<v Speaker 1>it once they get their allocations. But the U. S.

0:20:12.840 --> 0:20:15.880
<v Speaker 1>Government is kind of setting the allocations for the individual

0:20:15.880 --> 0:20:18.159
<v Speaker 1>states and territories and that's kind of the first step.

0:20:18.480 --> 0:20:21.120
<v Speaker 1>And then and then the manufacturing that's complicated as well.

0:20:21.160 --> 0:20:24.440
<v Speaker 1>Because these are injections. There's a manufacturing of the raw ingredients,

0:20:24.480 --> 0:20:26.520
<v Speaker 1>the m or and A itself at one factory, but

0:20:26.520 --> 0:20:29.080
<v Speaker 1>then there's a separate factory that does you know, puts

0:20:29.119 --> 0:20:31.040
<v Speaker 1>it into vials and insures it as sterile. So there's

0:20:31.040 --> 0:20:32.760
<v Speaker 1>several steps there as well. So it's all kind of

0:20:32.800 --> 0:20:36.560
<v Speaker 1>a very complicated system, made more complicated by the fact that,

0:20:37.040 --> 0:20:40.200
<v Speaker 1>as everyone's probably heard by now, Fighter's vaccine, these extreme

0:20:40.280 --> 0:20:45.960
<v Speaker 1>cold storage requirements, uh. And that means either extra ultracold freezers,

0:20:46.320 --> 0:20:49.760
<v Speaker 1>special ultracote fezers, or special dry ice containers that fisers

0:20:49.800 --> 0:20:53.040
<v Speaker 1>developed for places that don't have those freezers. Hey Bob,

0:20:53.040 --> 0:20:55.200
<v Speaker 1>how do we or how does the how is it

0:20:55.280 --> 0:20:59.080
<v Speaker 1>determined how much each state will receive? As it simply

0:20:59.640 --> 0:21:01.959
<v Speaker 1>pop elation is an infection rates the we Is there

0:21:02.000 --> 0:21:06.119
<v Speaker 1>a formula? Yeah? I believe that the government, I'm not

0:21:06.200 --> 0:21:08.480
<v Speaker 1>totally sure sure the government's kind of U S government

0:21:08.520 --> 0:21:11.240
<v Speaker 1>has set that that those figures, and I believe it's

0:21:11.320 --> 0:21:13.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, due to you know, it's more in the

0:21:13.800 --> 0:21:18.000
<v Speaker 1>total population in the group's uh, in the groups at

0:21:18.080 --> 0:21:20.880
<v Speaker 1>risk for the vaccident, But I don't know the fine

0:21:20.920 --> 0:21:24.720
<v Speaker 1>details of that. Where are we looking at more? Lockdown's

0:21:24.840 --> 0:21:26.679
<v Speaker 1>build a Blasio here? In New York, the mayor of

0:21:26.680 --> 0:21:29.280
<v Speaker 1>the city talking about the potential for New York City

0:21:29.320 --> 0:21:34.320
<v Speaker 1>to go into lockdown. Is that happening around the country still? Yeah, so, uh,

0:21:34.440 --> 0:21:36.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think what people need to think about

0:21:36.960 --> 0:21:40.160
<v Speaker 1>is uh that, yes, these vaccines are starting to law,

0:21:40.320 --> 0:21:42.639
<v Speaker 1>and that's very very good news, you know. But the

0:21:42.680 --> 0:21:45.040
<v Speaker 1>fact is we're still you know, in the thick of

0:21:45.080 --> 0:21:48.359
<v Speaker 1>like the worst ways of the pandemic, and these vaccines

0:21:48.400 --> 0:21:51.960
<v Speaker 1>are not gonna impact what's happening right now in terms

0:21:51.960 --> 0:21:53.800
<v Speaker 1>of infections and deaths. You know, they're not kind of

0:21:53.840 --> 0:21:56.199
<v Speaker 1>significant impact on that, you know, on a kind of

0:21:56.320 --> 0:21:59.840
<v Speaker 1>broad basis, uh, for for quite you know, quite a while.

0:22:00.200 --> 0:22:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Quite a number of people you know are vaccinated. Obviously

0:22:03.080 --> 0:22:05.520
<v Speaker 1>they'll help the people who get the vaccines. That's just

0:22:05.600 --> 0:22:07.879
<v Speaker 1>a very small percentage right now. So in terms of

0:22:07.880 --> 0:22:10.480
<v Speaker 1>the big picture, you know, what we need to do

0:22:10.680 --> 0:22:13.560
<v Speaker 1>to to to control this right now, it's the same

0:22:13.600 --> 0:22:16.040
<v Speaker 1>things that we need to be doing more of. It's

0:22:16.720 --> 0:22:19.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, avoiding credit places, wearing masks and all those things,

0:22:19.560 --> 0:22:21.520
<v Speaker 1>and those are gonna need to replace day in place

0:22:21.600 --> 0:22:23.840
<v Speaker 1>or quite some time. Hey, Bob, thanks so much for

0:22:24.000 --> 0:22:26.399
<v Speaker 1>joining us. As always, you always appreciate your reporting about

0:22:26.480 --> 0:22:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Langreth Bloomberg Healthcare reporter giving us the latest on the

0:22:30.160 --> 0:22:33.080
<v Speaker 1>vaccine rollout. Again, we've all probably seen images from this

0:22:33.160 --> 0:22:38.000
<v Speaker 1>morning vaccines being given around the country, Day one of

0:22:38.080 --> 0:22:40.320
<v Speaker 1>vaccines and what is sure to be a long process.

0:22:42.840 --> 0:22:44.920
<v Speaker 1>Did it's time now to take a look at the

0:22:44.960 --> 0:22:47.960
<v Speaker 1>credit markets and then maybe the markets more broadly, let's

0:22:47.960 --> 0:22:49.960
<v Speaker 1>bring in Mike Puccount and Deputy Chef Investment Officer of

0:22:50.040 --> 0:22:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Western Asset Management. I say the credit markets because they're

0:22:52.920 --> 0:22:55.720
<v Speaker 1>top of mind today, Mike, what with a MC being

0:22:55.760 --> 0:22:57.399
<v Speaker 1>in a little bit of trouble. We know that the

0:22:57.400 --> 0:23:01.080
<v Speaker 1>movie theaters have already topped all the credit the possibly

0:23:01.119 --> 0:23:04.520
<v Speaker 1>is available as them except for private individuals that are

0:23:04.560 --> 0:23:07.600
<v Speaker 1>looking to do that. And just curious as to where

0:23:07.640 --> 0:23:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you see the credit markets right now. Well, there's no

0:23:11.640 --> 0:23:14.520
<v Speaker 1>question and by the way, Vanni and Paul, thank you

0:23:14.560 --> 0:23:18.640
<v Speaker 1>for having me on UM. There's no no question that, Um,

0:23:18.680 --> 0:23:21.720
<v Speaker 1>there is still stress in the credit markets. You mentioned

0:23:21.760 --> 0:23:25.640
<v Speaker 1>amc Um. There's a lot of companies, there's a lot

0:23:25.680 --> 0:23:29.920
<v Speaker 1>of industries that have done pretty much everything they possibly

0:23:30.040 --> 0:23:34.040
<v Speaker 1>could to survive to this point. Um, some aren't going

0:23:34.080 --> 0:23:35.680
<v Speaker 1>to make it. And you actually see that in the

0:23:35.800 --> 0:23:40.400
<v Speaker 1>default numbers. UM I think many because the capital markets

0:23:40.480 --> 0:23:44.800
<v Speaker 1>up so quickly back in late March and early April UH,

0:23:44.880 --> 0:23:48.160
<v Speaker 1>some were able to access that rescue financing and even

0:23:48.200 --> 0:23:50.760
<v Speaker 1>though they paid dearly for doing that. UM I think

0:23:50.800 --> 0:23:53.240
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be a wise move on their part,

0:23:53.840 --> 0:23:58.960
<v Speaker 1>and UM will at least minimize how many of these

0:23:58.960 --> 0:24:04.560
<v Speaker 1>companies actually had to ultimately restructure or or file. So

0:24:05.119 --> 0:24:07.520
<v Speaker 1>UM I think the credit markets right now, there's no

0:24:07.640 --> 0:24:11.359
<v Speaker 1>question that some of the rally that we were expecting

0:24:11.400 --> 0:24:14.600
<v Speaker 1>to occur in two thousand one, some of that has

0:24:14.640 --> 0:24:18.920
<v Speaker 1>been pulled forward into two thousand twenty, just with clarity

0:24:19.000 --> 0:24:22.240
<v Speaker 1>on the vaccine. UM I think everyone's expecting as we

0:24:22.320 --> 0:24:26.000
<v Speaker 1>are bouncing growth a bouncing and earnings UM. But that

0:24:26.080 --> 0:24:30.000
<v Speaker 1>being said, I still think the credit markets have room

0:24:30.080 --> 0:24:33.520
<v Speaker 1>for performance as we move forward over the next few quarters,

0:24:33.760 --> 0:24:36.680
<v Speaker 1>probably going to be more of a focus on income,

0:24:36.800 --> 0:24:40.040
<v Speaker 1>focus on carry trade versus what we've seen over the

0:24:40.080 --> 0:24:42.480
<v Speaker 1>last two or three quarters, which has really been you

0:24:42.520 --> 0:24:45.600
<v Speaker 1>know about capital appreciation and spread tightening. I think the

0:24:46.160 --> 0:24:50.240
<v Speaker 1>magnitude of that spread tightening is probably behind us, but

0:24:50.240 --> 0:24:55.760
<v Speaker 1>but still opportunity UM in fixed income resectors broadly and

0:24:55.920 --> 0:24:59.840
<v Speaker 1>UM in particular in credit. So, Mike, you talked about

0:24:59.840 --> 0:25:03.000
<v Speaker 1>some performance maybe being brought forward a little bit here

0:25:03.000 --> 0:25:06.000
<v Speaker 1>in let's talk about high yield. Is there any value

0:25:06.240 --> 0:25:09.520
<v Speaker 1>left in high yield? It's amazing to me, you know,

0:25:09.560 --> 0:25:12.280
<v Speaker 1>how well that market has performed, given some of the

0:25:12.280 --> 0:25:14.840
<v Speaker 1>potential credit risks out there that are are quite likely,

0:25:15.040 --> 0:25:19.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, even going well into Yeah, it is surprising.

0:25:19.760 --> 0:25:22.639
<v Speaker 1>And if you just think about where we were, uh

0:25:22.640 --> 0:25:25.320
<v Speaker 1>in the depths of March and into early April, and

0:25:25.640 --> 0:25:28.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, now high yields up over six percent year

0:25:28.359 --> 0:25:31.239
<v Speaker 1>to date. UM. But I would say this, there's a

0:25:31.280 --> 0:25:34.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of disparity in high yield UM. If you look

0:25:34.680 --> 0:25:38.040
<v Speaker 1>at you know, just even by rating category UH, double

0:25:38.040 --> 0:25:41.000
<v Speaker 1>B high quality is doing very well, you know, up

0:25:41.080 --> 0:25:44.200
<v Speaker 1>nine and a half percent, triple CS UH. You know,

0:25:44.280 --> 0:25:47.800
<v Speaker 1>just think of the lowest quality within high yield UH

0:25:48.200 --> 0:25:51.160
<v Speaker 1>just up over a little over four percent year to date,

0:25:51.440 --> 0:25:55.320
<v Speaker 1>and then take that even further UM by industry energy

0:25:55.960 --> 0:25:59.080
<v Speaker 1>is negative still two percent year to date. UM. So

0:25:59.119 --> 0:26:01.960
<v Speaker 1>there is a lot of disparity within the high yield market.

0:26:02.520 --> 0:26:05.240
<v Speaker 1>And yes, we do still think there are opportunity. I

0:26:05.240 --> 0:26:07.680
<v Speaker 1>think it's um you know again, if you go back

0:26:07.720 --> 0:26:11.000
<v Speaker 1>to late March and early April, it was really just

0:26:11.400 --> 0:26:16.000
<v Speaker 1>get risk in high yield. Clearly the downside had overshot

0:26:16.040 --> 0:26:18.720
<v Speaker 1>and you just want to capitalize on that trade. I

0:26:18.760 --> 0:26:21.840
<v Speaker 1>think going forward you're going to see, um, just just

0:26:22.080 --> 0:26:25.919
<v Speaker 1>a lot more disparity or um, you know, just different

0:26:25.960 --> 0:26:29.320
<v Speaker 1>markets out performing in different markets underperforming. So I think

0:26:29.359 --> 0:26:32.000
<v Speaker 1>it's really gonna end up being you know, you got

0:26:32.080 --> 0:26:33.880
<v Speaker 1>to pick the right credits, you gotta pick the right

0:26:33.960 --> 0:26:39.800
<v Speaker 1>industry is really focus on bottom up discipline, fundamental research um.

0:26:39.920 --> 0:26:44.240
<v Speaker 1>So I do think that's there's opportunity there um. But again,

0:26:44.280 --> 0:26:46.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's going to be as obvious, and

0:26:46.520 --> 0:26:48.320
<v Speaker 1>I think it's gonna take a little more work to

0:26:48.359 --> 0:26:51.639
<v Speaker 1>identify those trades. That said, we're not getting any new

0:26:51.680 --> 0:26:53.920
<v Speaker 1>stimulus that we know of. Yes, I mean maybe it

0:26:53.960 --> 0:26:56.720
<v Speaker 1>will happen, but we don't know how that will impact businesses.

0:26:57.240 --> 0:27:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Surely there's going to be another rout of bankruptcies, Mike, Um,

0:27:02.960 --> 0:27:05.560
<v Speaker 1>I do think. I mean, I don't think there's going

0:27:05.600 --> 0:27:09.680
<v Speaker 1>to be an elevated spike of bankruptcyes. Um. I think

0:27:10.440 --> 0:27:13.919
<v Speaker 1>we know, or at least have a reasonable idea of

0:27:14.000 --> 0:27:17.879
<v Speaker 1>which companies are on the verge of having to file UM.

0:27:17.920 --> 0:27:20.040
<v Speaker 1>If you look at trading levels, I think the market

0:27:20.080 --> 0:27:23.320
<v Speaker 1>does a pretty good job of identifying those credits and

0:27:23.400 --> 0:27:27.160
<v Speaker 1>they tend to trade it very stressed or distressed prices.

0:27:27.840 --> 0:27:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Um all. I think the only way that we would

0:27:30.560 --> 0:27:33.760
<v Speaker 1>get UM sort of a new flare up, if you will,

0:27:33.880 --> 0:27:38.000
<v Speaker 1>or another round of defaults or bankruptcies, is if we

0:27:38.119 --> 0:27:42.239
<v Speaker 1>had disappointment on the vaccine. I think between now and

0:27:42.320 --> 0:27:46.560
<v Speaker 1>when we expect the vaccine to make its way into

0:27:46.720 --> 0:27:49.320
<v Speaker 1>the broad population, let's call that maybe over the next

0:27:49.320 --> 0:27:54.560
<v Speaker 1>two quarters. UM. I think the market is is expecting that.

0:27:54.720 --> 0:27:58.119
<v Speaker 1>I think the liquidity and on most of the balance

0:27:58.160 --> 0:28:00.240
<v Speaker 1>sheets of companies that are in the high you old

0:28:00.280 --> 0:28:04.200
<v Speaker 1>market is sufficient to get to that point. However, again,

0:28:04.200 --> 0:28:08.280
<v Speaker 1>if we had disappointment and UM, you know that vaccine

0:28:08.720 --> 0:28:12.719
<v Speaker 1>wasn't as successful or the vaccines aren't as successful, and

0:28:13.200 --> 0:28:16.080
<v Speaker 1>this extends into the latter part of two thousand twenty one,

0:28:16.359 --> 0:28:18.400
<v Speaker 1>I do think then you know you're you're you're going

0:28:18.440 --> 0:28:20.720
<v Speaker 1>to see some more vulnerabilities. You're going to see some

0:28:20.760 --> 0:28:25.080
<v Speaker 1>of these at risk sectors and at risk companies either

0:28:25.160 --> 0:28:29.119
<v Speaker 1>have to get another round of secured financing or perhaps

0:28:29.200 --> 0:28:32.080
<v Speaker 1>as you alluded to, UM have to to restructure, but

0:28:32.359 --> 0:28:35.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that's in our base case. Hey Mike,

0:28:35.160 --> 0:28:39.960
<v Speaker 1>what's uh, what's your thoughts on Janet Yelling as Biden's

0:28:40.080 --> 0:28:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Treasury Secretary nominee. Yeah, I think that was a wise choice. UM.

0:28:46.440 --> 0:28:50.320
<v Speaker 1>Definitely calming to the markets. UM. You know even saw

0:28:50.840 --> 0:28:53.840
<v Speaker 1>uh Larry Cudlow comment on that, and you know he's

0:28:53.880 --> 0:28:57.560
<v Speaker 1>one of the few from the Trump administration to say anything,

0:28:57.880 --> 0:29:01.200
<v Speaker 1>but clearly I mean Janet Yelling, you know, sensible views

0:29:01.280 --> 0:29:04.760
<v Speaker 1>on the economy as a former FED share UM. You know,

0:29:04.800 --> 0:29:06.920
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a certain level of comfort in the

0:29:06.960 --> 0:29:11.760
<v Speaker 1>market knowing that she understands the cohesion that's necessary between

0:29:12.080 --> 0:29:15.640
<v Speaker 1>between Fed and White House policy. UM. So I think

0:29:15.680 --> 0:29:18.760
<v Speaker 1>that was a wise choice and I think definitely UM

0:29:19.200 --> 0:29:24.720
<v Speaker 1>was was calming to the markets. So Michael, will you

0:29:24.720 --> 0:29:26.880
<v Speaker 1>be looking out now through year end? Are we going

0:29:26.920 --> 0:29:30.720
<v Speaker 1>to see this Santa calls while I continue? Yeah? I

0:29:31.080 --> 0:29:34.360
<v Speaker 1>think you know the new issue volume that UM in

0:29:34.360 --> 0:29:37.280
<v Speaker 1>both the investment grade market and the high old market.

0:29:37.560 --> 0:29:40.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, those are two records. There's just an extraordinary

0:29:40.160 --> 0:29:43.040
<v Speaker 1>amount of new issuance. UM. Now, a lot of that

0:29:43.200 --> 0:29:45.720
<v Speaker 1>was for REEF financing, which I think is is a

0:29:45.720 --> 0:29:48.440
<v Speaker 1>good thing. If you're a lender UM and you want

0:29:48.480 --> 0:29:54.480
<v Speaker 1>to classify new issuance into something that's either bondholder friendly

0:29:54.560 --> 0:29:58.960
<v Speaker 1>or bondholder not friendly, we'd obviously rather see more friendly purposes,

0:29:58.960 --> 0:30:02.600
<v Speaker 1>which we would call reefing dancing is definitely a friendly

0:30:02.720 --> 0:30:06.000
<v Speaker 1>use of proceeds UM. But clearly you're going to see

0:30:06.000 --> 0:30:08.840
<v Speaker 1>a slowdown in new issue volume over the next couple

0:30:08.880 --> 0:30:12.360
<v Speaker 1>of weeks. Um money continues to come into these markets,

0:30:13.080 --> 0:30:16.320
<v Speaker 1>both investment grade and high yield have seen, uh, you know,

0:30:16.360 --> 0:30:20.400
<v Speaker 1>an extraordinary amount of flows into both institutional as well

0:30:20.440 --> 0:30:24.320
<v Speaker 1>as retail funds, so you know, good technical backdrop from

0:30:24.360 --> 0:30:27.800
<v Speaker 1>that perspective. More money continuing to come in, uh, you know,

0:30:28.360 --> 0:30:32.120
<v Speaker 1>less new issue should result in at least stable spreads

0:30:32.120 --> 0:30:34.800
<v Speaker 1>and stable markets in my opinion, Hey Mike, thanks so

0:30:34.840 --> 0:30:37.800
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us. We really appreciate your thoughts. Mike P. Canon,

0:30:37.880 --> 0:30:41.640
<v Speaker 1>Deputy Chief Investment Officer for Western Asset Management based out

0:30:41.680 --> 0:30:45.440
<v Speaker 1>in Pasadena, California, really giving us up their thoughts on

0:30:45.640 --> 0:30:49.160
<v Speaker 1>the fixed income markets again, new issuance all time high.

0:30:50.760 --> 0:30:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to Boomberg Markets podcast. You can subscribe

0:30:54.240 --> 0:30:57.720
<v Speaker 1>and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast

0:30:57.800 --> 0:31:01.080
<v Speaker 1>platform you prefer. I'm Monnie Quinn. I'm on Twitter at

0:31:01.080 --> 0:31:03.200
<v Speaker 1>on e Quinn. And I'm Paul Sweeney. I'm on Twitter

0:31:03.280 --> 0:31:06.120
<v Speaker 1>at pt Sweeney. Before the podcast, you can always catch

0:31:06.160 --> 0:31:07.720
<v Speaker 1>us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio