WEBVTT - Fed Stays in Holding Pattern, Election Legal Issues

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:03.240
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carol Masser. Every day

0:00:03.279 --> 0:00:05.200
<v Speaker 1>we're bringing you the latest news from the world's of

0:00:05.200 --> 0:00:08.920
<v Speaker 1>business and finance, plus technology, politics. So much going on

0:00:08.960 --> 0:00:12.160
<v Speaker 1>in the world of politics, economics, and it's all harnessing

0:00:12.160 --> 0:00:15.000
<v Speaker 1>the power of Business Week reporters and editors. You can

0:00:15.000 --> 0:00:18.720
<v Speaker 1>download Bloomberg Business Week on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot com.

0:00:18.920 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>If you can also listen to our radio show at

0:00:21.000 --> 0:00:23.759
<v Speaker 1>two pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, and be sure to

0:00:23.760 --> 0:00:27.040
<v Speaker 1>watch us too on YouTube by searching Bloomberg Global News.

0:00:27.240 --> 0:00:29.880
<v Speaker 1>The Fed holding rates near zero, no change in the

0:00:29.920 --> 0:00:32.920
<v Speaker 1>bond buying pace, but this was widely expected. Here we

0:00:32.960 --> 0:00:36.760
<v Speaker 1>are just two days after election. Let's talk a little

0:00:36.760 --> 0:00:39.040
<v Speaker 1>bit about this decision or what we really need to

0:00:39.080 --> 0:00:41.479
<v Speaker 1>see or expect to see from the Fed over the

0:00:41.520 --> 0:00:44.159
<v Speaker 1>next few weeks. Let's get the Business Week agenda. Bloomberg

0:00:44.159 --> 0:00:48.000
<v Speaker 1>News Global Economics and Policy Editor Kathleen Hayes is with us,

0:00:48.040 --> 0:00:52.640
<v Speaker 1>and she is there in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker studio. Hey, Kathleen, Um,

0:00:52.800 --> 0:00:55.800
<v Speaker 1>we weren't expecting any surprises, correct, Well, of course, it's

0:00:55.800 --> 0:00:57.480
<v Speaker 1>hard to expect a suppress Now I know what you mean.

0:00:57.520 --> 0:01:00.160
<v Speaker 1>We figured, look, they're they're kind of stuck with what

0:01:00.240 --> 0:01:02.600
<v Speaker 1>they've got. Let me start though, by pointing something out,

0:01:02.640 --> 0:01:07.960
<v Speaker 1>because right before two o'clock I noted there's a very

0:01:08.040 --> 0:01:11.080
<v Speaker 1>small sell off today in bonds, but it's gotten a

0:01:11.120 --> 0:01:14.800
<v Speaker 1>little bit deeper. For example, the benchmark tenure, which was

0:01:14.840 --> 0:01:17.679
<v Speaker 1>down to thirty seconds, now down five thirty seconds. The

0:01:17.680 --> 0:01:20.680
<v Speaker 1>thirty year was down one thirty second, it's down six

0:01:20.720 --> 0:01:22.959
<v Speaker 1>thirty seconds. So maybe a little bit of upward pressure

0:01:22.959 --> 0:01:27.200
<v Speaker 1>on yields is a disappointment because maybe nobody expected the

0:01:27.200 --> 0:01:30.679
<v Speaker 1>Fed would say, hey, we're ready to start increasing our

0:01:31.319 --> 0:01:35.479
<v Speaker 1>bond purchases, but they what they did repeat is hey,

0:01:35.600 --> 0:01:37.039
<v Speaker 1>we're going to keep it where it is for now,

0:01:37.040 --> 0:01:39.080
<v Speaker 1>which is a hundred and twenty billion dollars a month,

0:01:39.160 --> 0:01:42.200
<v Speaker 1>eighty billion of treasuries, forty billion of mortgage backed securities.

0:01:42.640 --> 0:01:46.240
<v Speaker 1>And because when you know, coming into the elections, when

0:01:46.240 --> 0:01:49.680
<v Speaker 1>people were betting pretty heavily on a blue wave, that

0:01:49.720 --> 0:01:52.360
<v Speaker 1>would lead to a lot of fiscal stimulus, more than

0:01:52.760 --> 0:01:55.880
<v Speaker 1>if if Trump stayed in the White House, etcetera. We

0:01:55.960 --> 0:01:59.600
<v Speaker 1>saw the curve steepening, we saw long term yields going up.

0:01:59.600 --> 0:02:01.760
<v Speaker 1>But people we're saying, well, if nothing else. The Fed's

0:02:01.800 --> 0:02:04.040
<v Speaker 1>got to make it clear that they're going to work

0:02:04.080 --> 0:02:06.320
<v Speaker 1>against it if they have to. Well, what they're saying

0:02:06.360 --> 0:02:08.760
<v Speaker 1>so far today is don't have to do it yet.

0:02:09.040 --> 0:02:10.800
<v Speaker 1>So I think, Carol, this will be one of the

0:02:10.800 --> 0:02:12.760
<v Speaker 1>big questions at the top of the list for j

0:02:12.919 --> 0:02:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Powell when he starts that press conference at two thirty Eastern.

0:02:16.200 --> 0:02:17.919
<v Speaker 1>And maybe he just didn't want to stir the pot

0:02:18.000 --> 0:02:19.600
<v Speaker 1>in a in a week where the pot has been

0:02:19.600 --> 0:02:23.080
<v Speaker 1>stirred a lot. And having said that, Kathleen, he you know,

0:02:23.080 --> 0:02:26.120
<v Speaker 1>they fed another headline. They're going to continue to uh

0:02:26.160 --> 0:02:29.320
<v Speaker 1>focus obviously and watch the virus. They said the virus

0:02:29.400 --> 0:02:32.280
<v Speaker 1>will continue to weigh on economic activity. The virus to

0:02:32.320 --> 0:02:35.720
<v Speaker 1>pose considerable risks to the medium term outlook. They say

0:02:35.760 --> 0:02:39.799
<v Speaker 1>the overall financial conditions remain commitative, commodative, and they say

0:02:39.840 --> 0:02:44.120
<v Speaker 1>weaker demand, lower all oil prices, holding down inflation, economic

0:02:44.160 --> 0:02:47.440
<v Speaker 1>activity and employment have continued to recover. So that's kind

0:02:47.440 --> 0:02:51.799
<v Speaker 1>of their snapshot picture. Well, they've been saying, I would say,

0:02:51.800 --> 0:02:55.840
<v Speaker 1>pretty unanimously since March. Uh. In fact, you're making me

0:02:55.880 --> 0:02:58.359
<v Speaker 1>think of when I interviewed Jim Bullard from the St.

0:02:58.400 --> 0:03:01.359
<v Speaker 1>Louis FED and Rob A. Problem within two well one

0:03:01.400 --> 0:03:04.359
<v Speaker 1>day and then the next one, uh, you know, and

0:03:04.480 --> 0:03:06.799
<v Speaker 1>that was just after the emergency meeting where they started

0:03:06.800 --> 0:03:09.400
<v Speaker 1>cutting raids and they said, it's all about the virus.

0:03:09.680 --> 0:03:12.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, the unemployment headlines, the payrolls headlines don't mean

0:03:12.360 --> 0:03:14.320
<v Speaker 1>as much as the virus headlines. I think that started

0:03:14.320 --> 0:03:17.520
<v Speaker 1>to shift because the US economy is in recovery. The

0:03:17.639 --> 0:03:21.480
<v Speaker 1>job recovery seems to have slowed down, but that focus

0:03:21.600 --> 0:03:24.160
<v Speaker 1>till tomorrow. Right, Let's see if it continue, if the

0:03:24.480 --> 0:03:27.480
<v Speaker 1>economy at least continue to create jobs or not a

0:03:27.520 --> 0:03:29.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of people on unemployment, A lot of people go

0:03:29.760 --> 0:03:32.440
<v Speaker 1>going on the longer term unemployment, so that's still not

0:03:32.560 --> 0:03:35.680
<v Speaker 1>a positive sign. But that's about the virus. And that's

0:03:35.680 --> 0:03:39.800
<v Speaker 1>another reason where the FED would say, until this health

0:03:39.880 --> 0:03:42.720
<v Speaker 1>crisis is over, we can't we're not going to consider

0:03:42.760 --> 0:03:46.120
<v Speaker 1>doing any change in policy. Right, and the FEDS saying

0:03:46.120 --> 0:03:47.920
<v Speaker 1>that the path of recovery depending on the course of

0:03:47.960 --> 0:03:51.400
<v Speaker 1>the coronavirus pandemic. They know, we know it, everybody knows it.

0:03:51.440 --> 0:03:53.240
<v Speaker 1>But it does feel like Dave Wilson, come on in

0:03:53.280 --> 0:03:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Stocks columnist and editor watching the equity it feels

0:03:56.800 --> 0:03:58.760
<v Speaker 1>like equity markets kind of forgot that we are in

0:03:58.760 --> 0:04:01.720
<v Speaker 1>the midst of a pandemic. This week, well, it sure does.

0:04:01.840 --> 0:04:04.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you really saw a recovery from you know,

0:04:04.960 --> 0:04:08.119
<v Speaker 1>when day remembered last week and stocks really took a hit.

0:04:08.480 --> 0:04:11.880
<v Speaker 1>And today it's interesting because you know, the criticism about

0:04:11.960 --> 0:04:14.480
<v Speaker 1>yesterday's advance is that you know, you have the SMP

0:04:14.600 --> 0:04:16.640
<v Speaker 1>five hundred up more than two percent, and there are

0:04:16.640 --> 0:04:19.880
<v Speaker 1>actually more stocks in the index down than up by

0:04:20.040 --> 0:04:23.240
<v Speaker 1>some of the UH research I saw, I mean, that

0:04:23.320 --> 0:04:25.880
<v Speaker 1>was the first time it ever happened. And so today

0:04:26.000 --> 0:04:28.440
<v Speaker 1>what do you have, Uh, you know, SMP five hundred

0:04:28.520 --> 0:04:31.040
<v Speaker 1>up more than two percent again this time around, though

0:04:31.200 --> 0:04:33.600
<v Speaker 1>you have close to nine stocks up in the SMP

0:04:33.680 --> 0:04:36.479
<v Speaker 1>bile hunted for everyone that's down. So it's clear that

0:04:36.520 --> 0:04:39.400
<v Speaker 1>it's a blood based advanced this time around. Uh. You know,

0:04:39.760 --> 0:04:42.520
<v Speaker 1>the s and people a hundred rising toward its highs

0:04:42.520 --> 0:04:45.600
<v Speaker 1>of the day after the results of the FED meeting

0:04:45.600 --> 0:04:47.839
<v Speaker 1>were released. And if you look what's going on today,

0:04:47.920 --> 0:04:50.320
<v Speaker 1>it's a lot of the economically sensitive areas of the

0:04:50.360 --> 0:04:53.599
<v Speaker 1>market kind of leading the way, notably raw material producers

0:04:53.839 --> 0:04:57.400
<v Speaker 1>UH with gain for their index of four point seven

0:04:57.400 --> 0:04:59.680
<v Speaker 1>percent at the moment, I mean all eleven of the

0:04:59.720 --> 0:05:04.000
<v Speaker 1>main texts are higher, but the raw material producers certainly

0:05:04.040 --> 0:05:06.840
<v Speaker 1>jump out of today's trading. Listen, Kathleen, I just when

0:05:06.839 --> 0:05:09.680
<v Speaker 1>we think about Fed policy, you know, is it is

0:05:09.720 --> 0:05:12.000
<v Speaker 1>there a possibility I was listening to a guest that

0:05:12.080 --> 0:05:14.320
<v Speaker 1>David Weston head on, you know, the possibility that we

0:05:14.360 --> 0:05:17.040
<v Speaker 1>go back into negative rates or the Fed will need

0:05:17.080 --> 0:05:20.560
<v Speaker 1>to be more aggressive depending on where the economy goes. Well,

0:05:20.720 --> 0:05:23.760
<v Speaker 1>they keep saying they have more tools up until now

0:05:24.080 --> 0:05:27.240
<v Speaker 1>beneficials from J. Paul doesn't matter almost who you ask.

0:05:27.320 --> 0:05:30.360
<v Speaker 1>They're not fans of negative rates. They go right to

0:05:30.400 --> 0:05:32.760
<v Speaker 1>money market funds, for example, would really mess up that

0:05:32.839 --> 0:05:35.400
<v Speaker 1>market if you, uh, potentially if you if you're going

0:05:35.440 --> 0:05:38.440
<v Speaker 1>to move in that direction. Uh. And then beyond that,

0:05:39.240 --> 0:05:41.719
<v Speaker 1>I think the thing people might start talking about more

0:05:41.920 --> 0:05:44.799
<v Speaker 1>is yield curve control. Because if you want to officially

0:05:44.880 --> 0:05:47.080
<v Speaker 1>add a tool, I mean, if you're buying bonds and

0:05:47.160 --> 0:05:49.799
<v Speaker 1>you want to keep yields from right, you know, raising

0:05:49.839 --> 0:05:52.680
<v Speaker 1>too much, that's yes start of I think it's kind of,

0:05:52.839 --> 0:05:55.599
<v Speaker 1>you know, the precursor of Yelker control. But to take

0:05:55.600 --> 0:05:58.279
<v Speaker 1>it a step further and to target, make a target

0:05:58.320 --> 0:06:00.640
<v Speaker 1>for the tenure yield for example, and say we're going

0:06:00.720 --> 0:06:02.920
<v Speaker 1>to make sure it doesn't go above that. That would

0:06:02.960 --> 0:06:04.800
<v Speaker 1>be a step. I think the problem for the FED

0:06:04.920 --> 0:06:08.919
<v Speaker 1>right now, or the challenge is that sure bring another

0:06:09.000 --> 0:06:12.680
<v Speaker 1>tool in. As long as there's so many people unemployed

0:06:12.920 --> 0:06:14.599
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of people don't want to go back

0:06:14.600 --> 0:06:16.760
<v Speaker 1>to work, or their jobs aren't even there to go

0:06:16.839 --> 0:06:20.640
<v Speaker 1>back to, etcetera, etcetera, etcetera. Any tool is going to

0:06:20.800 --> 0:06:23.920
<v Speaker 1>have a tough time doing very much. But in addition

0:06:23.920 --> 0:06:26.719
<v Speaker 1>though that, the bond purchases, I think people figure you

0:06:26.720 --> 0:06:29.279
<v Speaker 1>can just flat out increase the amount. But it is

0:06:29.320 --> 0:06:31.520
<v Speaker 1>as you started out the beginning, I think hitting at

0:06:32.160 --> 0:06:35.279
<v Speaker 1>we're in an election week, not an election day anymore, right,

0:06:35.360 --> 0:06:37.839
<v Speaker 1>and the middle of all this, the Fed's best bet

0:06:37.920 --> 0:06:40.640
<v Speaker 1>is just to sit tight and wait for the December meeting. Well,

0:06:40.680 --> 0:06:42.120
<v Speaker 1>and the one thing that we're going to talk about

0:06:42.120 --> 0:06:45.240
<v Speaker 1>over the next few hours this split income, this split

0:06:45.279 --> 0:06:48.480
<v Speaker 1>outcome that we could potentially see if Joe Biden gets

0:06:48.480 --> 0:06:53.120
<v Speaker 1>the White House, if we have still a Republican Republican

0:06:53.279 --> 0:06:57.200
<v Speaker 1>controlled Senate, that the chance of a big stimulus package

0:06:57.960 --> 0:07:00.640
<v Speaker 1>is less likely. You know. So you you wonder, then

0:07:00.720 --> 0:07:03.440
<v Speaker 1>the FED watching this and what what more can they do?

0:07:03.560 --> 0:07:05.440
<v Speaker 1>And he can say and J. Powe will surely get

0:07:05.920 --> 0:07:07.880
<v Speaker 1>I can't imagine j Pie not feeling like he could

0:07:07.880 --> 0:07:11.320
<v Speaker 1>say today, well, no matter what happens, um, we still

0:07:11.320 --> 0:07:15.400
<v Speaker 1>need stimulus. He could certainly repeat that. I you know,

0:07:15.920 --> 0:07:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Mitch McConnell, who presumably maybe the SENTI majority leader or

0:07:18.880 --> 0:07:21.440
<v Speaker 1>may not depending on all it goes, right, said when

0:07:21.480 --> 0:07:25.000
<v Speaker 1>when they get back, when Congress reconvened, job one is

0:07:25.040 --> 0:07:29.040
<v Speaker 1>going to be a rescue package. Now, the trillion dollar

0:07:29.200 --> 0:07:31.600
<v Speaker 1>figure was on the table at one point, right, the

0:07:31.680 --> 0:07:36.560
<v Speaker 1>five billion that he floated before the election seemed really light. Um,

0:07:36.600 --> 0:07:39.559
<v Speaker 1>you know, so so I think I'm an optimist, Carol.

0:07:39.640 --> 0:07:41.720
<v Speaker 1>So I think it may not be two point two trillion,

0:07:41.760 --> 0:07:43.800
<v Speaker 1>which the Democrats have pushed hard for, lead by Nancy

0:07:43.840 --> 0:07:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Pelosians just last seats and you know, Democratic seats in

0:07:46.480 --> 0:07:49.040
<v Speaker 1>the House. But maybe maybe because something I could trillion.

0:07:49.200 --> 0:07:51.720
<v Speaker 1>That's that's not nothing, No, it's not nothing. There's a

0:07:51.720 --> 0:07:54.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of zeros in that number. Dave Wilson, just quickly

0:07:54.520 --> 0:07:56.760
<v Speaker 1>tease your chart because it has kind of an election

0:07:56.800 --> 0:08:00.360
<v Speaker 1>related I feel like our administration related theme. Well, it's

0:08:00.360 --> 0:08:03.480
<v Speaker 1>all about private prison stocks. President Trump tried to prop

0:08:03.560 --> 0:08:06.560
<v Speaker 1>up the industry not long after he got the into office.

0:08:06.880 --> 0:08:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Didn't work out so well, and now you got the

0:08:09.000 --> 0:08:11.360
<v Speaker 1>election results and things are getting worse for those stocks.

0:08:11.440 --> 0:08:13.640
<v Speaker 1>All right, We're looking forward to that. Hey, team, thank

0:08:13.680 --> 0:08:17.440
<v Speaker 1>you so much, really appreciated setting the agenda on this Thursday.

0:08:17.480 --> 0:08:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News Global Economics and Policy Editor Kathleen Hayes back

0:08:21.040 --> 0:08:23.840
<v Speaker 1>in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker studio and Bloomberg Stocks editor

0:08:23.920 --> 0:08:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Dave Wilson. This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer

0:08:27.800 --> 0:08:30.960
<v Speaker 1>from Bloomberg Radio. We're gonna bring you the latest on

0:08:31.120 --> 0:08:34.319
<v Speaker 1>this week's election as the counting of the votes continues,

0:08:34.360 --> 0:08:37.120
<v Speaker 1>the lawsuits continue, and we're all awaiting to find out

0:08:37.160 --> 0:08:41.160
<v Speaker 1>who will take up at Pennsylvania Avenue come January. We'll

0:08:41.240 --> 0:08:43.240
<v Speaker 1>joining me today as we go through it all over

0:08:43.280 --> 0:08:46.320
<v Speaker 1>the next few hours. Kevin CEREALI He is Bloomberg News Chief,

0:08:46.320 --> 0:08:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Washington correspondent of Bloomberg Radio and TV host. You know

0:08:49.160 --> 0:08:51.720
<v Speaker 1>him well a Bloomberg sound on on Bloomberg nine and

0:08:51.760 --> 0:08:54.240
<v Speaker 1>I one in Washington, d C. He joins us from there.

0:08:54.320 --> 0:08:57.079
<v Speaker 1>Juno Rosso also with US legal analyst and host of

0:08:57.080 --> 0:09:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Law on Bloomberg Radio every evening. He she joins

0:09:00.679 --> 0:09:03.480
<v Speaker 1>us on the phone in New York. So, Kevin, let

0:09:03.520 --> 0:09:06.000
<v Speaker 1>me kick it off with you. Where are we? I mean,

0:09:06.080 --> 0:09:08.480
<v Speaker 1>Nancy Lione just gave us a good rundown of some

0:09:08.600 --> 0:09:10.800
<v Speaker 1>of the key states and what's going on. But what

0:09:10.920 --> 0:09:13.079
<v Speaker 1>are you watching? What are you hearing also from the

0:09:13.080 --> 0:09:16.079
<v Speaker 1>Biden and Trump camps. Well, look, I think I think

0:09:16.080 --> 0:09:18.120
<v Speaker 1>first things first, it's great to be here with you, Carol,

0:09:18.200 --> 0:09:22.200
<v Speaker 1>great to have Ben. That beyond that, all eyes are

0:09:22.200 --> 0:09:24.920
<v Speaker 1>going to be on Nevada, right and Clark County, Nevada,

0:09:25.000 --> 0:09:28.160
<v Speaker 1>because that specifically where we're still getting some of the

0:09:28.200 --> 0:09:30.559
<v Speaker 1>vote tallies. Now, last I checked, just before I came

0:09:30.559 --> 0:09:33.120
<v Speaker 1>on air, I dove into the Bloomberg terminal and I

0:09:33.200 --> 0:09:37.440
<v Speaker 1>looked at the actual vote tally. Uh and Joe Biden

0:09:37.600 --> 0:09:41.360
<v Speaker 1>is leading by about twelve thousand votes. That's a razor

0:09:41.520 --> 0:09:46.480
<v Speaker 1>thin margin. Uh. So beyond that, the president's former director

0:09:46.520 --> 0:09:50.880
<v Speaker 1>of National Intelligence, Rick Renel, he is in Nevada right now.

0:09:51.320 --> 0:09:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Uh and fully just breeched reporters and said, essentially, they

0:09:54.520 --> 0:09:57.240
<v Speaker 1>are fully prepared to take this thing through the courts.

0:09:57.240 --> 0:10:02.080
<v Speaker 1>They're making this legal argument essentially that they believe there's

0:10:02.120 --> 0:10:05.920
<v Speaker 1>been a number of votes cast in Nevada by people

0:10:06.000 --> 0:10:07.920
<v Speaker 1>from out of state, so they don't feel that those

0:10:08.000 --> 0:10:10.680
<v Speaker 1>votes should be counted in the Nevada election. That's what's

0:10:10.679 --> 0:10:13.360
<v Speaker 1>going on in that state. We should note just the

0:10:13.400 --> 0:10:16.880
<v Speaker 1>electoral math right now. Joe Biden, based upon the Bloomberg

0:10:16.880 --> 0:10:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Electoral map total is that two hundred and sixty four,

0:10:20.240 --> 0:10:24.079
<v Speaker 1>which puts him just six electoral votes away a k a.

0:10:24.240 --> 0:10:27.360
<v Speaker 1>The size of Nevada away from reaching the magic number

0:10:27.800 --> 0:10:31.320
<v Speaker 1>of two hundred and seventy. The Trump campaign, for their part, UH,

0:10:31.360 --> 0:10:33.720
<v Speaker 1>they have said that they're going to pursue legal action

0:10:33.760 --> 0:10:37.480
<v Speaker 1>in Pennsylvania, in Wisconsin, UH, and even to some extent

0:10:37.520 --> 0:10:41.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe even in North Carolina. So that's where things stand

0:10:41.360 --> 0:10:44.760
<v Speaker 1>as of now. Obviously, as we've been reporting for the

0:10:44.760 --> 0:10:49.199
<v Speaker 1>past week, really this week, we're urging patients caution as

0:10:49.240 --> 0:10:51.319
<v Speaker 1>as we sort through all of this. But as we

0:10:51.400 --> 0:10:53.280
<v Speaker 1>get the developments, will will break them in real time.

0:10:53.360 --> 0:10:54.880
<v Speaker 1>I want to get to June, but just remind me

0:10:55.000 --> 0:10:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Kevin d j T the president, where is he in

0:10:57.480 --> 0:11:01.200
<v Speaker 1>terms of electoral votes right now? Well, right now he

0:11:01.400 --> 0:11:04.360
<v Speaker 1>is still a couple of votes away. I believe the

0:11:04.440 --> 0:11:07.920
<v Speaker 1>last I checked. It was to eighteen for for President Trump. Um,

0:11:08.280 --> 0:11:11.680
<v Speaker 1>and uh so that's where he is right now, but

0:11:11.760 --> 0:11:13.320
<v Speaker 1>he would have to win. He still has a shot.

0:11:13.360 --> 0:11:16.439
<v Speaker 1>We should mention if he if he wins Georgia, North

0:11:16.480 --> 0:11:21.360
<v Speaker 1>Carolina as well as Pennsylvania, that would put him, uh

0:11:21.400 --> 0:11:23.560
<v Speaker 1>with a path. It's just you know, it's you know,

0:11:24.040 --> 0:11:26.040
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna have to pursue legal action. Yeah, it's strict

0:11:26.080 --> 0:11:28.520
<v Speaker 1>your path. I think that's safe to say. Yeah, exactly. So, June,

0:11:28.559 --> 0:11:30.480
<v Speaker 1>come on in. I mean, you watch the legal world,

0:11:30.480 --> 0:11:33.079
<v Speaker 1>you know it so well. Kevin talked about some of

0:11:33.120 --> 0:11:35.520
<v Speaker 1>the lawsuits that we've been seeing fast, you know, fast

0:11:35.559 --> 0:11:38.440
<v Speaker 1>and furiously crossing the bloomberg. You know, what do we

0:11:38.480 --> 0:11:41.840
<v Speaker 1>need to know about the Trump team and the lawsuits

0:11:41.880 --> 0:11:45.600
<v Speaker 1>that are out there, Well, they are filing a lot

0:11:45.640 --> 0:11:47.640
<v Speaker 1>of lawsuits, that's the first thing you need to know.

0:11:47.679 --> 0:11:49.520
<v Speaker 1>And they're filing them, you know, in a lot of

0:11:49.520 --> 0:11:52.280
<v Speaker 1>these states where the vote is still being counted, or

0:11:52.280 --> 0:11:55.040
<v Speaker 1>in other states for example like Michigan. And there are

0:11:55.080 --> 0:11:58.360
<v Speaker 1>different reasons for the lawsuits, but most of the time

0:11:58.400 --> 0:12:01.240
<v Speaker 1>they're being turned away by the it's for example, they

0:12:01.400 --> 0:12:05.280
<v Speaker 1>tried to stop the ballot counting in Michigan yesterday, Well,

0:12:06.080 --> 0:12:09.559
<v Speaker 1>a judge said, the essence of the count is completed.

0:12:09.640 --> 0:12:12.360
<v Speaker 1>The relief is completely unavailable. So I think any of

0:12:12.400 --> 0:12:16.000
<v Speaker 1>their any of their lawsuits to stop the count are

0:12:16.040 --> 0:12:19.040
<v Speaker 1>going to have a lot of trouble getting through. And

0:12:19.120 --> 0:12:21.840
<v Speaker 1>also a lot of these other cases you've heard. Kevin

0:12:21.880 --> 0:12:24.400
<v Speaker 1>mentioned that there's that they are saying this in about

0:12:24.480 --> 0:12:26.959
<v Speaker 1>Nevada Clark County. But a problem is they're making a

0:12:27.000 --> 0:12:30.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of allegations, but when they go into a judge

0:12:30.160 --> 0:12:32.679
<v Speaker 1>to try to prove them, they don't have the evidence

0:12:32.720 --> 0:12:36.439
<v Speaker 1>to back them. So you're hearing all kinds of fraud allegations,

0:12:36.440 --> 0:12:39.199
<v Speaker 1>but you know where is the fraud. They alleged that

0:12:39.480 --> 0:12:43.120
<v Speaker 1>um in Georgia yesterday that a poll worker had put

0:12:43.520 --> 0:12:46.839
<v Speaker 1>the votes that ballots that came in late mixed them

0:12:46.840 --> 0:12:49.679
<v Speaker 1>with the votes of ballots that had come in on time.

0:12:50.080 --> 0:12:52.240
<v Speaker 1>That was proven when it went before a judge not

0:12:52.320 --> 0:12:54.160
<v Speaker 1>to be the case. And a lot of the poll

0:12:54.240 --> 0:12:59.160
<v Speaker 1>observers actually they found that they look for things and

0:12:59.200 --> 0:13:02.240
<v Speaker 1>they sometimes line things that really aren't there because they're

0:13:02.280 --> 0:13:04.959
<v Speaker 1>they're looking. And then today President Trump said there was

0:13:05.000 --> 0:13:07.760
<v Speaker 1>a huge victory in Pennsylvania in court. Do you know

0:13:07.760 --> 0:13:12.080
<v Speaker 1>what that victory was. The pole observers from the Trump

0:13:12.120 --> 0:13:15.839
<v Speaker 1>campaign were allowed to move from about thirty feet observing

0:13:15.880 --> 0:13:18.520
<v Speaker 1>to sixty to six feet up turving, So it was

0:13:19.200 --> 0:13:21.760
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, that's online anyway, so you can

0:13:21.800 --> 0:13:25.000
<v Speaker 1>see it online. So that's not a huge victory, right.

0:13:25.080 --> 0:13:27.160
<v Speaker 1>A lot of it goes to transparency, which is what

0:13:27.520 --> 0:13:30.360
<v Speaker 1>the campaigns, both campaigns to be fair, have been pushing

0:13:30.360 --> 0:13:33.000
<v Speaker 1>for all along in this process. I do want to

0:13:33.000 --> 0:13:34.960
<v Speaker 1>bring into the conversation. It's been one of our go

0:13:35.040 --> 0:13:38.640
<v Speaker 1>to voices on the campaign in the election, joining June

0:13:38.679 --> 0:13:41.520
<v Speaker 1>and Kevin and myself as Bloomberg News political contributor and

0:13:41.559 --> 0:13:44.800
<v Speaker 1>I own a college professor of political science, Genzano joining

0:13:44.880 --> 0:13:48.480
<v Speaker 1>us once again from New Rochelle, New York. You and

0:13:48.520 --> 0:13:50.360
<v Speaker 1>I we've been talking for a long time. We all

0:13:50.440 --> 0:13:52.720
<v Speaker 1>have been um. But here we are Thursday, and there

0:13:52.720 --> 0:13:54.959
<v Speaker 1>are expectations that this could go on for a few

0:13:55.000 --> 0:13:57.640
<v Speaker 1>more days. When you look at where we are in

0:13:57.720 --> 0:14:01.880
<v Speaker 1>the race, what comes to mind first and most well,

0:14:02.160 --> 0:14:05.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, a bit still trying to grapple with the fact,

0:14:05.160 --> 0:14:07.760
<v Speaker 1>as you mentioned, that we are now on Thursday and

0:14:07.840 --> 0:14:10.960
<v Speaker 1>looking like we may not have results in for a

0:14:11.000 --> 0:14:13.360
<v Speaker 1>couple of days. You know, going into this, we knew

0:14:13.600 --> 0:14:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Pennsylvania may take until Friday. I was probably optimistic um

0:14:18.320 --> 0:14:21.800
<v Speaker 1>that it wouldn't come down to Pennsylvania. But at this point,

0:14:21.840 --> 0:14:24.160
<v Speaker 1>I think one thing that comes to mind is the

0:14:24.200 --> 0:14:26.800
<v Speaker 1>idea that we are still waiting on results not just

0:14:26.920 --> 0:14:32.480
<v Speaker 1>from Pennsylvania, but Nevada, Georgia, North Carolina, and of course,

0:14:32.600 --> 0:14:35.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, depending on who you're listening to, some people

0:14:35.320 --> 0:14:37.880
<v Speaker 1>haven't even been you know, quite satisfied with what's coming

0:14:37.880 --> 0:14:41.400
<v Speaker 1>out of Arizona at this point. So the closeness as

0:14:41.440 --> 0:14:44.120
<v Speaker 1>we sort of compare this historically to say a two

0:14:44.160 --> 0:14:47.520
<v Speaker 1>thousand in many states, and the fact we're not just

0:14:47.600 --> 0:14:50.320
<v Speaker 1>talking about one state where there maybe you were just

0:14:50.360 --> 0:14:54.000
<v Speaker 1>talking about potential contests, legal challenges, but that we're talking

0:14:54.120 --> 0:14:57.120
<v Speaker 1>multiple states, you know, quite a difference, and I think

0:14:57.120 --> 0:14:59.440
<v Speaker 1>that speaks volumes as to where we are at this

0:14:59.480 --> 0:15:03.560
<v Speaker 1>point in our country and how divided we are. Hey, Jeannie,

0:15:03.600 --> 0:15:06.880
<v Speaker 1>it's uh Kevin here, and let me just correct something

0:15:06.920 --> 0:15:10.359
<v Speaker 1>I recently said. Uh, Trump has two hundred and fourteen

0:15:10.800 --> 0:15:13.320
<v Speaker 1>electoral votes. I want to be careful with this, so,

0:15:13.760 --> 0:15:17.160
<v Speaker 1>uh Joe Biden has two hundred sixty four six votes

0:15:17.200 --> 0:15:20.480
<v Speaker 1>away from the threshold of two seventy. President Trump has

0:15:20.480 --> 0:15:23.760
<v Speaker 1>two hundred and fourteen electoral votes. That's where the map

0:15:24.000 --> 0:15:25.760
<v Speaker 1>stands right now. And you can follow all of our

0:15:25.800 --> 0:15:30.000
<v Speaker 1>election coverage. Mind you on election go on the Bloomberg terminal. Jennie,

0:15:30.080 --> 0:15:32.480
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned Arizona, and I want to pick up on

0:15:32.520 --> 0:15:35.240
<v Speaker 1>that because that has been a conversation that I've been

0:15:35.240 --> 0:15:38.160
<v Speaker 1>having with my sources in the President's reelection campaign. They

0:15:38.160 --> 0:15:42.040
<v Speaker 1>are really confident that once the math is settled on

0:15:42.200 --> 0:15:47.920
<v Speaker 1>Maricopa County, that they will have the votes to win Arizona.

0:15:48.320 --> 0:15:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Explain to us where things stand right now in this

0:15:51.440 --> 0:15:54.280
<v Speaker 1>key battleground state that the networks and the associated press

0:15:54.720 --> 0:15:59.280
<v Speaker 1>have called for, uh, Joe Biden at this point, UM,

0:15:59.320 --> 0:16:03.760
<v Speaker 1>So you know, it's it's a fascinating situation in Arizona. UM.

0:16:04.120 --> 0:16:08.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, again, we're looking at about six percent um

0:16:08.960 --> 0:16:12.720
<v Speaker 1>have been counted already, and we see a very narrow

0:16:12.800 --> 0:16:16.920
<v Speaker 1>lead for Joe Biden. UM about depending again on on

0:16:17.000 --> 0:16:19.320
<v Speaker 1>what numbers and when they've been refreshed, that you're looking

0:16:19.360 --> 0:16:22.480
<v Speaker 1>at about fifty point five percent to forty eight point one.

0:16:22.520 --> 0:16:25.000
<v Speaker 1>It's a little bit bigger than some of the others

0:16:25.000 --> 0:16:27.640
<v Speaker 1>but it's such a critical state because it has eleven

0:16:27.640 --> 0:16:31.680
<v Speaker 1>electoral votes. And when some of the you know networks

0:16:31.680 --> 0:16:34.040
<v Speaker 1>and others started calling it, as we talked about on

0:16:34.200 --> 0:16:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Tuesday Night Box, and then later the ape started calling

0:16:37.640 --> 0:16:40.440
<v Speaker 1>it a bit early, that really frustrated the president and

0:16:40.560 --> 0:16:44.960
<v Speaker 1>his team. UM. And now we are looking to see nobody,

0:16:45.000 --> 0:16:46.840
<v Speaker 1>as far as I have have said, and I don't

0:16:46.840 --> 0:16:48.680
<v Speaker 1>want to misspeak because I'm trying to keep up with

0:16:48.680 --> 0:16:50.760
<v Speaker 1>whatevere everbody is. But nobody, as far as I know,

0:16:50.840 --> 0:16:53.240
<v Speaker 1>who called it has taken the call back, which is

0:16:53.240 --> 0:16:56.440
<v Speaker 1>an indication that they feel pretty confident. But I do

0:16:56.600 --> 0:16:58.760
<v Speaker 1>think that it is one of those cases where we

0:16:58.760 --> 0:17:01.560
<v Speaker 1>will see legal challenge just from the President's team because

0:17:01.600 --> 0:17:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Arizona is such a critical state for the president and

0:17:04.720 --> 0:17:08.600
<v Speaker 1>his team. UM. The idea that that goes Biden. Of course,

0:17:08.680 --> 0:17:12.200
<v Speaker 1>in two two thousand and sixteen, you had the president

0:17:12.280 --> 0:17:16.600
<v Speaker 1>beating Hillary Clinton there about fifty one point one. We're seeing,

0:17:16.640 --> 0:17:19.040
<v Speaker 1>if you believe the numbers of six percent reporting, receive

0:17:19.080 --> 0:17:22.560
<v Speaker 1>almost a slip there with Joe Biden. So I think

0:17:22.600 --> 0:17:24.679
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be one of the contested states. The

0:17:24.680 --> 0:17:28.720
<v Speaker 1>president seems feels like they need that particularly since miss

0:17:28.800 --> 0:17:31.640
<v Speaker 1>At least in my view, Michigan and Wisconsin seems so

0:17:31.720 --> 0:17:34.320
<v Speaker 1>out of grasp to the president even legally at this point.

0:17:34.320 --> 0:17:35.840
<v Speaker 1>But I don't want to misspeak on that. You know,

0:17:35.880 --> 0:17:38.320
<v Speaker 1>we've talked about Arizona, Nevada, I mean those two counties,

0:17:38.400 --> 0:17:40.159
<v Speaker 1>Clark in Maricopa. I mean, these are two of the

0:17:40.240 --> 0:17:42.200
<v Speaker 1>largest counties in the US. So there's a lot of

0:17:42.280 --> 0:17:45.400
<v Speaker 1>votes to process, no doubt about it, I do under Genie,

0:17:45.440 --> 0:17:48.640
<v Speaker 1>depending on the outcome. One thing to remember here, you

0:17:48.720 --> 0:17:51.920
<v Speaker 1>understand this process. You've studied a lot of elections. I mean,

0:17:52.160 --> 0:17:55.439
<v Speaker 1>it's not uncommon, especially if there's a close race, you know,

0:17:55.720 --> 0:17:58.639
<v Speaker 1>to go and check the count and confirm that the

0:17:58.640 --> 0:18:03.160
<v Speaker 1>outcome is the outcome. Yeah, it's not unusual, but I

0:18:03.160 --> 0:18:05.720
<v Speaker 1>think you know the fact Number one, what is unusual

0:18:05.720 --> 0:18:09.199
<v Speaker 1>as we see so many states so closely, um, you

0:18:09.200 --> 0:18:11.600
<v Speaker 1>know that are so close rather and the other thing

0:18:11.640 --> 0:18:14.359
<v Speaker 1>that I think is a bit unusual is the idea

0:18:14.440 --> 0:18:17.400
<v Speaker 1>that you would have so many legal challenges. I don't

0:18:17.400 --> 0:18:20.680
<v Speaker 1>think we've seen anything like this, But historically, I don't

0:18:20.680 --> 0:18:22.800
<v Speaker 1>think this is something we should be surprised at because

0:18:22.840 --> 0:18:25.399
<v Speaker 1>this is to a certain extent where we've been moving

0:18:25.800 --> 0:18:30.040
<v Speaker 1>since two thousands, you know, in the United States. Unfortunately,

0:18:30.080 --> 0:18:33.119
<v Speaker 1>at this point elections have very much moved into the

0:18:33.200 --> 0:18:37.560
<v Speaker 1>court system, and for a democracy, that is a big

0:18:37.640 --> 0:18:40.640
<v Speaker 1>question to think about broader than just this election. Yeah,

0:18:40.680 --> 0:18:43.160
<v Speaker 1>democracy can be messy. I do want to mention a headline.

0:18:43.240 --> 0:18:44.840
<v Speaker 1>It was about half an hour before we came on

0:18:44.880 --> 0:18:48.000
<v Speaker 1>air a Pennsylvania officials saying that most votes may be

0:18:48.200 --> 0:18:51.800
<v Speaker 1>counted by today, so continuing to of course count them

0:18:52.080 --> 0:18:53.720
<v Speaker 1>a June, come on in on this. You're listening to

0:18:53.720 --> 0:18:58.200
<v Speaker 1>our conversation, Hi, Jennie, Well, we're just talking about Pennsylvania.

0:18:58.280 --> 0:19:01.199
<v Speaker 1>Carol said that they're acting that most votes will be

0:19:01.240 --> 0:19:05.320
<v Speaker 1>counted by today, and earlier today, Joe Biden's campaign manager

0:19:06.280 --> 0:19:09.199
<v Speaker 1>said that Biden is closing in on Trump's lead and

0:19:09.200 --> 0:19:11.199
<v Speaker 1>that by the end of the day, Biden is going

0:19:11.240 --> 0:19:13.639
<v Speaker 1>to win by a sizable number of votes. I wonder

0:19:13.640 --> 0:19:18.480
<v Speaker 1>if you think that's overly optimistic about Pennsylvania. You know,

0:19:19.080 --> 0:19:21.320
<v Speaker 1>that's what I It's such a good question, because that's

0:19:21.320 --> 0:19:24.480
<v Speaker 1>what I have and you know, we've long believed that

0:19:24.560 --> 0:19:27.280
<v Speaker 1>those later votes, the mail in ballots, if you will,

0:19:27.359 --> 0:19:32.680
<v Speaker 1>the absentee ballots with favor President sorry, Vice President Biden

0:19:33.280 --> 0:19:36.360
<v Speaker 1>m because the Democrats had been so careful to get

0:19:36.400 --> 0:19:39.760
<v Speaker 1>their vote out early and same day voting would favor

0:19:39.960 --> 0:19:42.600
<v Speaker 1>the president to a certain extent. So I am not

0:19:42.760 --> 0:19:45.520
<v Speaker 1>surprised to hear that. So it's gonna be not just

0:19:45.640 --> 0:19:48.680
<v Speaker 1>when people voted, but where the vote count there, where

0:19:48.720 --> 0:19:51.199
<v Speaker 1>they're still voting. And I think as we look like

0:19:51.240 --> 0:19:53.960
<v Speaker 1>a place like Pennsylvania, that doesn't surprise me. Nor by

0:19:53.960 --> 0:19:56.800
<v Speaker 1>the way, it doesn't surprise me that the vice president

0:19:56.840 --> 0:19:59.560
<v Speaker 1>is going to get votes out of Georgia as discount continues.

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:02.679
<v Speaker 1>So based on those two factors, so when they voted,

0:20:02.720 --> 0:20:05.600
<v Speaker 1>and where they were voting, where the vote count is

0:20:05.640 --> 0:20:08.880
<v Speaker 1>still coming from, rather, I think it is not surprising

0:20:08.920 --> 0:20:11.600
<v Speaker 1>that we see a narrowing of the gap. And you know,

0:20:12.240 --> 0:20:15.679
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't want to predict that Biden would overtake the

0:20:15.720 --> 0:20:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Trump in Pennsylvania, but I you know, I think it

0:20:18.440 --> 0:20:22.320
<v Speaker 1>is possible still at this point. And folks, if it

0:20:22.320 --> 0:20:25.240
<v Speaker 1>sounds confusing, it's because it is right because the president

0:20:25.320 --> 0:20:28.120
<v Speaker 1>is I mean, I mean, and it even for us

0:20:28.200 --> 0:20:30.760
<v Speaker 1>and in this business. But I can't even imagine following

0:20:30.800 --> 0:20:33.720
<v Speaker 1>along at home because there's just right now threats of

0:20:33.840 --> 0:20:37.119
<v Speaker 1>legal action and we don't have really hard, hard data

0:20:37.200 --> 0:20:41.120
<v Speaker 1>or hard documentation source material in front of us and June,

0:20:41.119 --> 0:20:44.399
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I would put this question to June because specifically,

0:20:44.560 --> 0:20:47.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, as it relates to the case that we

0:20:47.080 --> 0:20:51.080
<v Speaker 1>saw go to the Supreme Court on October, right, the

0:20:51.440 --> 0:20:55.520
<v Speaker 1>case that the new judge Amy Coney Barrett decided not

0:20:55.560 --> 0:20:57.600
<v Speaker 1>to participate in because she was just a few days

0:20:57.640 --> 0:21:01.840
<v Speaker 1>on the job. And honestly, we might be revisiting that case,

0:21:01.840 --> 0:21:04.960
<v Speaker 1>which would allow for votes that are postmarked on election

0:21:05.040 --> 0:21:08.160
<v Speaker 1>day to be counted in Pennsylvania for up to three

0:21:08.240 --> 0:21:10.760
<v Speaker 1>days afterward. And that's what I hear a lot of

0:21:10.760 --> 0:21:14.600
<v Speaker 1>my sources talking about. But the President has even uh

0:21:14.880 --> 0:21:18.840
<v Speaker 1>given conflicting statements via social media on Twitter on this

0:21:18.880 --> 0:21:21.920
<v Speaker 1>particular point. What don't we know specifically June about that

0:21:22.520 --> 0:21:25.200
<v Speaker 1>uh Pennsylvania case. And June just got thirty seconds, and

0:21:25.200 --> 0:21:27.800
<v Speaker 1>then we'll come back, Okay, this it's too complicated to

0:21:27.840 --> 0:21:31.080
<v Speaker 1>do in thirty seconds, So I'll just say it's very complicated.

0:21:31.200 --> 0:21:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Let's pick up with it on the other side, because

0:21:34.119 --> 0:21:36.280
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of indications that it may not

0:21:36.480 --> 0:21:39.320
<v Speaker 1>actually get to the Supreme Court, but there are possibilities

0:21:39.359 --> 0:21:41.760
<v Speaker 1>that it could and It depends on a lot of

0:21:41.800 --> 0:21:45.320
<v Speaker 1>different factors. And just to remind everyone, this is about

0:21:45.359 --> 0:21:49.120
<v Speaker 1>the Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision that ballots that were postmarked

0:21:49.119 --> 0:21:53.080
<v Speaker 1>by election day could be received three days after election day.

0:21:53.320 --> 0:21:55.840
<v Speaker 1>The Supreme Court did not touch that by a fourd

0:21:55.880 --> 0:21:58.440
<v Speaker 1>or four vote, but some of the conservative justice has said, well,

0:21:58.480 --> 0:22:00.879
<v Speaker 1>we can come back to this maybe after the election.

0:22:01.359 --> 0:22:04.800
<v Speaker 1>So the possibilities, as Kevin mentioned, the possibilities there are

0:22:04.880 --> 0:22:09.399
<v Speaker 1>that being a Bush v. Gore scenario, the possibilities are there,

0:22:09.440 --> 0:22:12.920
<v Speaker 1>but there has to be basically a perfect storm of problems.

0:22:13.280 --> 0:22:16.359
<v Speaker 1>The election has to be so close that Pennsylvania is

0:22:16.400 --> 0:22:19.800
<v Speaker 1>the pivotal state that the election results depend on. The

0:22:19.840 --> 0:22:22.959
<v Speaker 1>margin of the vote in Pennsylvania has to be the

0:22:23.040 --> 0:22:26.240
<v Speaker 1>same or less than the number of ballots that are contested.

0:22:26.359 --> 0:22:28.960
<v Speaker 1>So there's the number of ballots that are contested and

0:22:29.040 --> 0:22:31.600
<v Speaker 1>we're counted, there'll be held, there are being held aside.

0:22:32.119 --> 0:22:34.920
<v Speaker 1>That has to be greater than the margin that separates

0:22:35.000 --> 0:22:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Biden and Trump so that it would change the election results.

0:22:39.520 --> 0:22:41.479
<v Speaker 1>So you have to have all those things going on.

0:22:41.560 --> 0:22:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Remember Bush v. Gore was about five seven ballots. Yeah,

0:22:45.560 --> 0:22:47.200
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty you know, we're really getting in the weeds.

0:22:47.240 --> 0:22:49.720
<v Speaker 1>But we're understanding how this process works. G D, come

0:22:49.720 --> 0:22:53.720
<v Speaker 1>on back in. You know. I do wonder how you anticipate,

0:22:54.400 --> 0:22:56.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, the next few days kind of playing out,

0:22:57.119 --> 0:22:59.600
<v Speaker 1>or is this that a possibility that we go into

0:22:59.640 --> 0:23:02.040
<v Speaker 1>next week before we really know who is the winner

0:23:02.560 --> 0:23:06.240
<v Speaker 1>for the White House? You know, I would expect that

0:23:06.280 --> 0:23:09.879
<v Speaker 1>we would know sooner than next week. I would think

0:23:10.000 --> 0:23:13.479
<v Speaker 1>that we should know if Pennsylvania does finish counting by

0:23:13.480 --> 0:23:16.440
<v Speaker 1>the end of the day today, you know, into tomorrow,

0:23:16.520 --> 0:23:19.200
<v Speaker 1>as we were originally told. Um, you know, we get

0:23:19.240 --> 0:23:22.160
<v Speaker 1>results fairly soon. UM. And I don't want to misspeak

0:23:22.160 --> 0:23:25.560
<v Speaker 1>out of Arizona Nevada. You know already Arizona, you know,

0:23:25.640 --> 0:23:27.439
<v Speaker 1>has been called by the A P and others, and

0:23:27.640 --> 0:23:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg has gone with that call. Um. I think we

0:23:31.080 --> 0:23:35.280
<v Speaker 1>should know because depending on who you are watching, Um,

0:23:35.600 --> 0:23:37.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, Joe Biden is very close to that to

0:23:38.200 --> 0:23:41.359
<v Speaker 1>sevent d mark. Now that's not to say that the

0:23:41.400 --> 0:23:44.760
<v Speaker 1>president is not going to challenge those results. So I'm

0:23:44.760 --> 0:23:48.119
<v Speaker 1>not suggesting that we're going to accept that yet, Jennie,

0:23:48.119 --> 0:23:50.560
<v Speaker 1>and I think that raises such a great point, right

0:23:50.600 --> 0:23:55.840
<v Speaker 1>because just earlier today Clark County registrar Joe Gloria, he's

0:23:55.880 --> 0:23:59.199
<v Speaker 1>the official in Nevada who's overseeing all of this and

0:23:59.240 --> 0:24:03.560
<v Speaker 1>this incredibly important, important battleground state right now six electoral votes.

0:24:03.600 --> 0:24:07.160
<v Speaker 1>He's saying that it might take until Saturday or Sunday

0:24:07.200 --> 0:24:11.040
<v Speaker 1>before the state's largest county, Clark County, Las Vegas. Clark

0:24:11.119 --> 0:24:14.960
<v Speaker 1>County finishes their votes tabulations, so they might not official

0:24:15.040 --> 0:24:18.040
<v Speaker 1>give officially give this to Standford the approval until this

0:24:18.119 --> 0:24:21.160
<v Speaker 1>weekend out in Nevada. So they're taking their I don't

0:24:21.160 --> 0:24:23.240
<v Speaker 1>want to say they're taking their time, but but according

0:24:23.280 --> 0:24:26.200
<v Speaker 1>to him, he said at a press conference earlier today, quote,

0:24:26.200 --> 0:24:29.840
<v Speaker 1>our goal here in Clark County is not to count fast.

0:24:30.200 --> 0:24:33.040
<v Speaker 1>We want to make sure that we are being accurate.

0:24:33.119 --> 0:24:34.520
<v Speaker 1>And he went on to say that they still have

0:24:34.560 --> 0:24:38.879
<v Speaker 1>at least sixty three thousand, two hundred and sixty two

0:24:39.119 --> 0:24:43.439
<v Speaker 1>ballots Carol, that they still have less account um and

0:24:43.480 --> 0:24:45.639
<v Speaker 1>then coupled with all these legal threats that we're seeing

0:24:45.880 --> 0:24:49.640
<v Speaker 1>coming from the Trump campaign, Yeah, it's pretty remarkable. So, Geenie,

0:24:49.720 --> 0:24:52.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, when I watched this process, we've talked about

0:24:52.240 --> 0:24:54.720
<v Speaker 1>it before, We're going to talk about this later, that

0:24:54.800 --> 0:24:57.720
<v Speaker 1>maybe we need a better election process that maybe the

0:24:57.800 --> 0:25:01.040
<v Speaker 1>electoral college has you know, it's time has um. What's

0:25:01.040 --> 0:25:05.480
<v Speaker 1>your observations on this and what's the likelihood of something changing? Well,

0:25:05.520 --> 0:25:08.080
<v Speaker 1>you know that it's it's such a good question. There

0:25:08.080 --> 0:25:11.280
<v Speaker 1>are you know, obviously, the electoral college is part of

0:25:11.280 --> 0:25:15.200
<v Speaker 1>our constitution. There are ways to get around, if you will,

0:25:15.240 --> 0:25:19.280
<v Speaker 1>the electoral college without amending the constitution, because I don't

0:25:19.320 --> 0:25:22.560
<v Speaker 1>see that happening anytime soon. We haven't amended the constitution

0:25:22.600 --> 0:25:25.879
<v Speaker 1>since the early nineteen seventies. In this partisan environment, I

0:25:25.880 --> 0:25:28.600
<v Speaker 1>think it would be tough to do. But we do

0:25:28.760 --> 0:25:33.080
<v Speaker 1>have movements out there, like the National Popular Vote compact Um,

0:25:33.480 --> 0:25:36.920
<v Speaker 1>which are closing in on this sort of back end

0:25:37.000 --> 0:25:39.480
<v Speaker 1>way to get around it, which would be that a

0:25:39.600 --> 0:25:43.200
<v Speaker 1>number of states totaling two seventy more or more electoral

0:25:43.240 --> 0:25:47.560
<v Speaker 1>college votes agree to the compact um where they will

0:25:47.640 --> 0:25:51.480
<v Speaker 1>follow the national popular vote winner. So if they make

0:25:51.520 --> 0:25:53.600
<v Speaker 1>headway there, and I think I don't want to me speak,

0:25:53.640 --> 0:25:56.679
<v Speaker 1>I think you're about seventy electoral college votes short of that.

0:25:57.160 --> 0:26:00.400
<v Speaker 1>If they make progress there, if you have have enough

0:26:00.440 --> 0:26:03.520
<v Speaker 1>states following the popular vote like that, then you know

0:26:03.560 --> 0:26:06.280
<v Speaker 1>the idea that the electoral college winner wouldn't be the

0:26:06.280 --> 0:26:09.399
<v Speaker 1>popular vote winner would be off the table. Do I

0:26:09.440 --> 0:26:11.920
<v Speaker 1>think that's going to happen anytime soon? I think it's

0:26:12.040 --> 0:26:16.159
<v Speaker 1>more likely. Um, you know, if we were to have

0:26:16.200 --> 0:26:18.679
<v Speaker 1>a result this time where the popular vote winner was

0:26:18.680 --> 0:26:21.600
<v Speaker 1>not the electoral college vote winner. If not, and Carol,

0:26:22.240 --> 0:26:25.320
<v Speaker 1>that's not that I doubt it. Yeah, but that's where

0:26:25.320 --> 0:26:30.000
<v Speaker 1>the divided government really gets interesting, especially on on changing

0:26:30.040 --> 0:26:32.720
<v Speaker 1>things like the Supreme Court, because Republicans are looking like

0:26:32.720 --> 0:26:34.879
<v Speaker 1>they're going to have a majority in the Senate and

0:26:34.880 --> 0:26:37.719
<v Speaker 1>that means that is going to happen as far as

0:26:37.800 --> 0:26:39.840
<v Speaker 1>all the people have been talking about court packing, and

0:26:39.840 --> 0:26:42.240
<v Speaker 1>it was such a big question and Joe Biden was

0:26:42.240 --> 0:26:45.000
<v Speaker 1>going to appoint a commission and without the Senate, there's

0:26:45.040 --> 0:26:46.720
<v Speaker 1>not even a question about it. It's why we have

0:26:46.720 --> 0:26:48.600
<v Speaker 1>to think about so many different things, especially when it

0:26:48.600 --> 0:26:51.320
<v Speaker 1>comes to making change. Jeanie's know you're the best. Thank

0:26:51.359 --> 0:26:53.960
<v Speaker 1>you so much, Bloomberg News political contributor and I own

0:26:53.960 --> 0:26:57.200
<v Speaker 1>a college professor of political science. On the phone from Westchester.

0:26:57.400 --> 0:27:01.840
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer from Bloomberg Radio.

0:27:02.200 --> 0:27:06.720
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Masser from Bloomberg Radio.

0:27:07.000 --> 0:27:10.880
<v Speaker 1>All right. This week's voting process. Man, we're all over it. Uh.

0:27:10.880 --> 0:27:13.919
<v Speaker 1>It seems like it's similar to what happened in as

0:27:13.960 --> 0:27:16.359
<v Speaker 1>many wondering, you know, has many of us wondering about

0:27:16.400 --> 0:27:19.919
<v Speaker 1>how we elect presidents, and we're talking about the electoral college.

0:27:20.000 --> 0:27:22.920
<v Speaker 1>This story, uh, this upcoming story that we're gonna talk about.

0:27:23.080 --> 0:27:25.199
<v Speaker 1>It's in the new issue of Bloomberg Business Week magazine.

0:27:25.240 --> 0:27:28.399
<v Speaker 1>It's about how we maybe need to make America boring

0:27:28.440 --> 0:27:32.159
<v Speaker 1>again by fixing its dated system. That story reported by

0:27:32.200 --> 0:27:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg New senior international affairs reporter Mark Champion joining Kevin Silli,

0:27:36.080 --> 0:27:38.760
<v Speaker 1>June Grosso and me. Mark joining us from London. Mark,

0:27:38.800 --> 0:27:41.320
<v Speaker 1>it's great to have you here with us, so tell

0:27:41.400 --> 0:27:46.800
<v Speaker 1>us about our system uh not doing so well? Huh, Yes,

0:27:46.920 --> 0:27:49.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's in a way it's ironic because you know,

0:27:49.840 --> 0:27:52.639
<v Speaker 1>this is the you know, a country that has the

0:27:52.640 --> 0:27:56.399
<v Speaker 1>oldest constitutional democracy in the world, extremely rightly proud of it,

0:27:56.480 --> 0:28:01.359
<v Speaker 1>the constitution. Uh, and yet the constitution is part of

0:28:01.400 --> 0:28:03.960
<v Speaker 1>the problem in the sense that you know, this is

0:28:03.960 --> 0:28:08.000
<v Speaker 1>an election system that has kind of become ossified and

0:28:08.080 --> 0:28:11.359
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the problems that many many countries had

0:28:11.480 --> 0:28:14.399
<v Speaker 1>and have gradually sort of worked out over the years,

0:28:14.760 --> 0:28:17.440
<v Speaker 1>it hasn't really been possible to do that in the US,

0:28:17.840 --> 0:28:20.720
<v Speaker 1>and so you have a system where, you know, just

0:28:20.840 --> 0:28:24.760
<v Speaker 1>to take one example, we've had a lot of uh,

0:28:25.080 --> 0:28:28.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, toxic debate really over voter I D and

0:28:28.680 --> 0:28:33.080
<v Speaker 1>voter registration, with accusations that you know, it's a tools

0:28:33.119 --> 0:28:35.560
<v Speaker 1>for suppression and all that sort of thing. Well, you know,

0:28:35.600 --> 0:28:39.160
<v Speaker 1>in a country like India, which has eight hundred million voters,

0:28:39.640 --> 0:28:44.520
<v Speaker 1>very complicated federal system, very complication complicated elections. UM, they

0:28:44.560 --> 0:28:49.040
<v Speaker 1>have automatic registration at the age of eighteen. You're issued automatically,

0:28:49.560 --> 0:28:51.719
<v Speaker 1>it's sent free in the mail to you a photo

0:28:51.800 --> 0:28:54.719
<v Speaker 1>ID card which is matched to the electoral role. There

0:28:54.840 --> 0:28:58.120
<v Speaker 1>simply isn't a problem. So there's a lot of structural

0:28:58.160 --> 0:29:02.160
<v Speaker 1>issues like that that really come to the surface when

0:29:03.080 --> 0:29:09.320
<v Speaker 1>the political atmosphere becomes very polarized and the debate becomes

0:29:09.560 --> 0:29:12.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, poisonous, and that is really what's happened in

0:29:12.880 --> 0:29:17.240
<v Speaker 1>the US. Mark I was really impressed with the system

0:29:17.320 --> 0:29:21.320
<v Speaker 1>that you just talked about, the automatic registration system in India,

0:29:21.840 --> 0:29:24.880
<v Speaker 1>But I wonder if anything like that would work here

0:29:25.160 --> 0:29:28.080
<v Speaker 1>when we're in a country where even with you know,

0:29:28.160 --> 0:29:31.800
<v Speaker 1>some government directives to wear masks that there are people

0:29:31.840 --> 0:29:34.520
<v Speaker 1>who think that that intinges on their liberty rights. So

0:29:34.560 --> 0:29:39.080
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if it would work here. Uh, well, that's

0:29:39.240 --> 0:29:41.920
<v Speaker 1>it's a very you know, a good question and a

0:29:41.960 --> 0:29:44.680
<v Speaker 1>good point. I mean, I guess the count that would

0:29:44.720 --> 0:29:47.920
<v Speaker 1>be that a lot of states have implemented what amounts

0:29:47.920 --> 0:29:51.400
<v Speaker 1>to automatic registration, um, you know, other states have not.

0:29:51.600 --> 0:29:53.720
<v Speaker 1>And that kind of goes to a second issue with

0:29:53.800 --> 0:29:56.160
<v Speaker 1>the US, which is quite you know, quite unusual in

0:29:56.200 --> 0:30:00.480
<v Speaker 1>the US. Even federal systems like Canada, you know, Germany, UH,

0:30:00.600 --> 0:30:04.800
<v Speaker 1>India and others, they have a single electoral authority that

0:30:04.840 --> 0:30:08.800
<v Speaker 1>administers the election, sets the rules, determines when poll polling

0:30:08.840 --> 0:30:11.560
<v Speaker 1>stations open, and not what the ballot design isn't all

0:30:11.640 --> 0:30:14.320
<v Speaker 1>that it's it's done from one part of the end

0:30:14.360 --> 0:30:18.200
<v Speaker 1>of the country to the other by the same organization

0:30:18.720 --> 0:30:22.760
<v Speaker 1>applying the same rules. The US doesn't do that. The

0:30:22.840 --> 0:30:27.840
<v Speaker 1>US Constitution gives the authority for the elections to individual states.

0:30:27.840 --> 0:30:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Of what you have is a very different voting experience

0:30:31.640 --> 0:30:34.640
<v Speaker 1>in you know, a state like Georgia from a state

0:30:34.720 --> 0:30:38.080
<v Speaker 1>like Vermont. And in fact, when you know rankings are

0:30:38.120 --> 0:30:45.400
<v Speaker 1>done where the electoral performance processes of UH countries across

0:30:45.400 --> 0:30:50.440
<v Speaker 1>the world have put it under the microscope on different criteria,

0:30:50.840 --> 0:30:53.040
<v Speaker 1>and you come up with the ranking. You know, Vermont

0:30:53.120 --> 0:30:55.960
<v Speaker 1>is right up there with the best countries, the Scandinavias

0:30:56.000 --> 0:31:00.160
<v Speaker 1>and and Scandinavian countries and so on. But George, as

0:31:00.320 --> 0:31:04.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, way down in a completely different world, even

0:31:04.480 --> 0:31:07.920
<v Speaker 1>not doing as well as the Republic of Georgia, the

0:31:07.920 --> 0:31:12.320
<v Speaker 1>former Soviet Republic of Georgia. Well, I mean, with all

0:31:12.400 --> 0:31:16.280
<v Speaker 1>due respect, actually I'll take that far back to the Soviets.

0:31:16.680 --> 0:31:19.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean they don't have the best record of democracy

0:31:19.160 --> 0:31:25.360
<v Speaker 1>and not apples to apples, right, but other But you know,

0:31:25.480 --> 0:31:28.600
<v Speaker 1>but other countries have much better systems than we do.

0:31:28.640 --> 0:31:32.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we have state by state, county by county,

0:31:32.280 --> 0:31:34.440
<v Speaker 1>and it makes and you see what happens. Look at them.

0:31:34.520 --> 0:31:37.640
<v Speaker 1>Look at the different results we're getting when and the

0:31:37.720 --> 0:31:40.160
<v Speaker 1>different rules that are in place. I mean, I think

0:31:40.200 --> 0:31:43.680
<v Speaker 1>it's needs reforming. Well, Mark, come on in, because reading

0:31:43.680 --> 0:31:46.320
<v Speaker 1>through your story is you know there's someone you quote

0:31:46.320 --> 0:31:47.800
<v Speaker 1>in it, and just as part of the problem is

0:31:47.840 --> 0:31:50.360
<v Speaker 1>that the U S system is it's old. You know

0:31:50.480 --> 0:31:52.880
<v Speaker 1>that it was drafted when there were no women judges.

0:31:52.920 --> 0:31:55.360
<v Speaker 1>There were slaves in California, didn't exist. I mean, there

0:31:55.360 --> 0:31:58.720
<v Speaker 1>were you know, we all talk about disruption. Systems need

0:31:58.800 --> 0:32:02.160
<v Speaker 1>to be you know, revised, made better, and we could

0:32:02.200 --> 0:32:05.720
<v Speaker 1>do that. They do, they do need to be revised.

0:32:05.720 --> 0:32:09.680
<v Speaker 1>And you know Germany, for example, is constantly revising its

0:32:09.720 --> 0:32:13.840
<v Speaker 1>electoral system and its constitution. It's just much easier to do.

0:32:14.000 --> 0:32:15.880
<v Speaker 1>And then the sort of the irony is that, you know,

0:32:16.440 --> 0:32:19.280
<v Speaker 1>Americans after the war were quite involved one way and

0:32:19.320 --> 0:32:22.520
<v Speaker 1>another in h you know, helping the Jones with their constitution.

0:32:23.280 --> 0:32:27.360
<v Speaker 1>But you know, the the American constitution itself is very

0:32:27.440 --> 0:32:31.400
<v Speaker 1>hard to change. It has been changed not very many times. Uh.

0:32:31.560 --> 0:32:34.440
<v Speaker 1>And you know it is you know, at times that's

0:32:34.440 --> 0:32:37.400
<v Speaker 1>a great thing. At other times it's it's an obstacle.

0:32:38.680 --> 0:32:42.440
<v Speaker 1>What does the United States do right? Mark? What does

0:32:42.480 --> 0:32:46.200
<v Speaker 1>it do right? Well? Actually, the you know, it was

0:32:46.280 --> 0:32:50.240
<v Speaker 1>quite interesting in listening to the the os CE, monitors

0:32:50.520 --> 0:32:53.960
<v Speaker 1>for the Organization for Security in Corporation in Europe. They

0:32:54.040 --> 0:32:56.960
<v Speaker 1>monitor you know, elections in all of their member states,

0:32:56.960 --> 0:33:00.560
<v Speaker 1>the fifty seven afterm including the US. Every every member

0:33:00.680 --> 0:33:03.040
<v Speaker 1>is committed to let these monitors come and look at

0:33:03.080 --> 0:33:05.640
<v Speaker 1>their elections. And at the end, they you know, they

0:33:05.680 --> 0:33:07.320
<v Speaker 1>say what was good, what was bad? And they give

0:33:07.320 --> 0:33:10.400
<v Speaker 1>recommendations and on and one of the things that they

0:33:10.720 --> 0:33:14.560
<v Speaker 1>said is that the really the spirit. So this is

0:33:14.600 --> 0:33:18.240
<v Speaker 1>the spirit of all the people who are running the elections,

0:33:18.280 --> 0:33:22.120
<v Speaker 1>the volunteers, the local officials. There's an army of people

0:33:22.160 --> 0:33:25.600
<v Speaker 1>out there doing it. And the point that they made

0:33:25.680 --> 0:33:28.720
<v Speaker 1>is that, you know, the reason this system works, you know,

0:33:28.800 --> 0:33:32.400
<v Speaker 1>it is still a functioning democracy, is that all these people,

0:33:33.240 --> 0:33:37.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, are you know, they're doing something they believe in,

0:33:37.760 --> 0:33:40.480
<v Speaker 1>and that they are you know, fairly well trained, they

0:33:40.520 --> 0:33:44.440
<v Speaker 1>know what they're doing. Uh, And so that works where

0:33:44.440 --> 0:33:51.040
<v Speaker 1>they said that it falls down no easy feat, No,

0:33:51.120 --> 0:33:53.080
<v Speaker 1>not an easy feat at all. And and it's sort

0:33:53.080 --> 0:33:57.680
<v Speaker 1>of had to grow organically because it isn't just done

0:33:57.720 --> 0:34:00.760
<v Speaker 1>by you know, a single organization that kind of can

0:34:00.800 --> 0:34:04.200
<v Speaker 1>hone all of its you know, the wheels of its machinery.

0:34:04.280 --> 0:34:08.520
<v Speaker 1>It happens, uh, you know, organically, and grows up over

0:34:08.520 --> 0:34:11.759
<v Speaker 1>the years in different ways, in different states. Um. And

0:34:11.800 --> 0:34:14.319
<v Speaker 1>at times you know that it's normally that work fine.

0:34:14.320 --> 0:34:18.160
<v Speaker 1>All through the twentieth century, it work fine, but you know,

0:34:18.360 --> 0:34:21.800
<v Speaker 1>increasingly it's a problem. And that's really because of the polarization,

0:34:22.200 --> 0:34:24.880
<v Speaker 1>and that presses down on the weaknesses in the systems,

0:34:25.200 --> 0:34:28.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, the places where someone can you know, take advantage.

0:34:29.160 --> 0:34:32.880
<v Speaker 1>And arguably you've seen that happen where several states, you know,

0:34:33.040 --> 0:34:35.160
<v Speaker 1>with the mail in votes and so on, several states

0:34:35.200 --> 0:34:40.000
<v Speaker 1>said well, you can't start counting until you know election day, uh,

0:34:40.040 --> 0:34:42.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, whereas other states counted early and it was

0:34:42.520 --> 0:34:45.040
<v Speaker 1>all dealt with. And now you have, you know, we

0:34:45.080 --> 0:34:47.839
<v Speaker 1>have what we have with the prest thing that these

0:34:48.719 --> 0:34:51.040
<v Speaker 1>mark we gotta run. I'm so sorry, but everybody should

0:34:51.040 --> 0:34:53.439
<v Speaker 1>go online check out the magazine because it's a great read.

0:34:53.560 --> 0:34:56.759
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's a very different country when our forefathers

0:34:56.800 --> 0:34:59.919
<v Speaker 1>created it, that's for sure. This is Bloomberg Business Week

0:35:00.160 --> 0:35:04.520
<v Speaker 1>with Carol Messer from Bloomberg Radio. President Trump's legal team, Man,

0:35:04.560 --> 0:35:07.479
<v Speaker 1>this has been an important issue we know of this

0:35:07.600 --> 0:35:12.000
<v Speaker 1>election cycle. We've been anticipating the legal angle of the election,

0:35:12.440 --> 0:35:14.480
<v Speaker 1>uh leading up to the election, and we continue to

0:35:14.520 --> 0:35:17.719
<v Speaker 1>talk about it as a Trump's team in particular, has

0:35:17.719 --> 0:35:21.200
<v Speaker 1>really flooded states with lawsuits as the count continues. Let's

0:35:21.239 --> 0:35:23.480
<v Speaker 1>get into what we need to know on the legal front.

0:35:23.520 --> 0:35:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Derek Muller is Professor of law at University of Iowa

0:35:26.480 --> 0:35:29.799
<v Speaker 1>College of Law. He's taught courses in election law and

0:35:29.880 --> 0:35:32.200
<v Speaker 1>federal courts and so much more. He joins us on

0:35:32.239 --> 0:35:35.920
<v Speaker 1>the phone from Iowa City, Iowa. Derek, great to have

0:35:35.960 --> 0:35:39.040
<v Speaker 1>you here with Kevin and June and myself. So when

0:35:39.080 --> 0:35:41.759
<v Speaker 1>you look at this and here we are waiting for

0:35:41.800 --> 0:35:45.000
<v Speaker 1>an outcome. We know that there are talks and of

0:35:45.080 --> 0:35:48.479
<v Speaker 1>recounts and legal cases. What is it that you think

0:35:48.680 --> 0:35:50.840
<v Speaker 1>is the most important when it comes to the legal

0:35:50.920 --> 0:35:55.360
<v Speaker 1>story of election. Yeah, I mean it's a sort of

0:35:55.360 --> 0:35:59.120
<v Speaker 1>flooding the zone right now. I think about you know, um,

0:35:59.239 --> 0:36:03.200
<v Speaker 1>the three tracks happening right now. Um, but it's sort

0:36:03.239 --> 0:36:05.359
<v Speaker 1>of an open question about how many, if any, are

0:36:05.360 --> 0:36:07.520
<v Speaker 1>going to be decisive. Right. So there's the one track

0:36:07.600 --> 0:36:10.279
<v Speaker 1>where there are lawsuits saying that the Trump campaign has

0:36:10.280 --> 0:36:14.000
<v Speaker 1>been denied access to observe certain procedures in the election. Um,

0:36:14.040 --> 0:36:16.120
<v Speaker 1>they want one of those in Pennsylvania today. That's an

0:36:16.120 --> 0:36:18.719
<v Speaker 1>appeal and there's some others pending in other states to

0:36:18.760 --> 0:36:20.400
<v Speaker 1>say we need to have our people in the building

0:36:20.400 --> 0:36:22.960
<v Speaker 1>to make sure everything looks okay. Um. That might slow

0:36:23.000 --> 0:36:25.839
<v Speaker 1>things down briefly, but it doesn't really change a whole lot,

0:36:26.239 --> 0:36:29.120
<v Speaker 1>except unless the observers inject. The second thing is to

0:36:29.160 --> 0:36:32.440
<v Speaker 1>think about sort of challenges to certain batches of ballots.

0:36:32.440 --> 0:36:36.480
<v Speaker 1>So they've sued in some places in Georgia and Pennsylvania.

0:36:36.520 --> 0:36:39.920
<v Speaker 1>To day, this county has had this particular procedure either

0:36:40.400 --> 0:36:43.080
<v Speaker 1>UM with handwriting mismatch or the like that that wasn't

0:36:43.200 --> 0:36:46.440
<v Speaker 1>sort of properly approved. They're not implementing it correctly. UM,

0:36:46.480 --> 0:36:49.600
<v Speaker 1>so those might affect small batches of ballots. UM. So

0:36:49.719 --> 0:36:51.960
<v Speaker 1>far they haven't. But that's sort of one potential thing

0:36:52.000 --> 0:36:53.960
<v Speaker 1>to think about. And the third is the recounts. They've

0:36:53.960 --> 0:36:57.239
<v Speaker 1>already indicated they like to recount Wisconsin. We'll see, we're

0:36:57.239 --> 0:36:59.640
<v Speaker 1>sort of waiting for some final results, right. We have

0:36:59.680 --> 0:37:02.399
<v Speaker 1>to finish account before we can get to the recount UM,

0:37:02.440 --> 0:37:04.640
<v Speaker 1>and then we'll see what happens. But I think, you know,

0:37:04.719 --> 0:37:07.239
<v Speaker 1>with all these things, that depends if it's if it's

0:37:07.239 --> 0:37:10.440
<v Speaker 1>a Biden campaign appears to be substantially ahead in a

0:37:10.520 --> 0:37:13.080
<v Speaker 1>large number of states. UM, at the end of these accounts,

0:37:13.160 --> 0:37:14.960
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be very hard to succeed because you

0:37:15.040 --> 0:37:16.400
<v Speaker 1>really got to get all your ducks in a row

0:37:16.440 --> 0:37:21.279
<v Speaker 1>in all these places. So Derek lawsuits were dismissed in

0:37:21.600 --> 0:37:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Michigan and Georgia, and today Pennsylvania Republicans withdrew their request

0:37:26.680 --> 0:37:29.960
<v Speaker 1>for court order in a suburban county in near Philly

0:37:30.000 --> 0:37:33.840
<v Speaker 1>where they accused officials of illegally allowing mail involves to

0:37:33.840 --> 0:37:38.160
<v Speaker 1>be counted before election day. Now they're the losses. The

0:37:38.239 --> 0:37:41.080
<v Speaker 1>one the one win that I see is the one

0:37:41.160 --> 0:37:45.120
<v Speaker 1>you refer to. Where about access to the counting process?

0:37:45.160 --> 0:37:48.200
<v Speaker 1>And could they get closer to watch six ft instead

0:37:48.200 --> 0:37:52.520
<v Speaker 1>of the thirty ft. Do you see any other victories

0:37:52.640 --> 0:37:56.880
<v Speaker 1>that the Trump campaign has had in lawsuits? Uh? No

0:37:57.000 --> 0:37:59.520
<v Speaker 1>other victories so far, at least none, none that I've

0:38:00.000 --> 0:38:01.600
<v Speaker 1>seen there. There Again, there are so many, it's hard

0:38:01.640 --> 0:38:04.920
<v Speaker 1>to keep track. Um, but I think, yeah, the observer

0:38:05.040 --> 0:38:07.520
<v Speaker 1>ones are interesting because they really are facts on the

0:38:07.560 --> 0:38:09.640
<v Speaker 1>ground right there. They are the questions about, you know,

0:38:10.000 --> 0:38:12.520
<v Speaker 1>was this observer doing something disruptive where they entitled to

0:38:12.560 --> 0:38:15.200
<v Speaker 1>be there? Was it a timing issue, whatever it might be.

0:38:15.239 --> 0:38:18.200
<v Speaker 1>And again the Pennsylvania Supreme Court is reconsidering that the

0:38:18.280 --> 0:38:20.560
<v Speaker 1>challenge we just talked about, um for some of these

0:38:20.560 --> 0:38:23.120
<v Speaker 1>other ones, saying you know, these ballots shouldn't be counted,

0:38:23.120 --> 0:38:26.719
<v Speaker 1>they should be excluded. You know that they're not cured properly. Um,

0:38:26.760 --> 0:38:29.000
<v Speaker 1>those might take a few more days because they're not

0:38:29.080 --> 0:38:32.239
<v Speaker 1>as suppressing. Right, the observation has to be happening right

0:38:32.280 --> 0:38:35.279
<v Speaker 1>now as they're counting, whereas if we've counted everything else

0:38:35.320 --> 0:38:37.520
<v Speaker 1>and we're fighting over a smaller batch of ballots, those

0:38:37.560 --> 0:38:39.719
<v Speaker 1>things might come you know, in the next week. So

0:38:39.760 --> 0:38:42.239
<v Speaker 1>we'll see about that front. Um. But it's it's very

0:38:42.239 --> 0:38:43.920
<v Speaker 1>hard that there's sort of again a lot of things

0:38:44.000 --> 0:38:46.320
<v Speaker 1>out there, and it's it's hard to tell without getting

0:38:46.320 --> 0:38:48.560
<v Speaker 1>deep in the weeds on the particular fact and the

0:38:48.560 --> 0:38:51.800
<v Speaker 1>trustworthiness of the witnesses allegations and what the other side

0:38:51.800 --> 0:38:54.560
<v Speaker 1>has to say about whether or not this is normal. Um,

0:38:54.600 --> 0:38:56.440
<v Speaker 1>it's just hard to sort of make sort of broad

0:38:56.480 --> 0:38:59.239
<v Speaker 1>based claims about whether any particular ones look look really

0:38:59.320 --> 0:39:02.279
<v Speaker 1>good at this time. And just following up on there

0:39:02.280 --> 0:39:06.640
<v Speaker 1>are several lawsuits that are talking about and requiring or

0:39:06.719 --> 0:39:10.680
<v Speaker 1>want more access to the ballot process as you just described.

0:39:11.120 --> 0:39:15.240
<v Speaker 1>But will those mean anything after the vote is counted?

0:39:15.280 --> 0:39:17.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean, is there Yes, they want to get access,

0:39:17.760 --> 0:39:21.120
<v Speaker 1>they want to see closer, But what happens after the

0:39:21.560 --> 0:39:24.440
<v Speaker 1>ballots are counted? Does that where does that leave them?

0:39:24.440 --> 0:39:27.399
<v Speaker 1>Is there any remedy for them? So not? I mean

0:39:27.400 --> 0:39:30.480
<v Speaker 1>after they're counted. They're counted, right, So, um, you know,

0:39:30.520 --> 0:39:34.000
<v Speaker 1>the observation there is is particularly important to make sure

0:39:34.080 --> 0:39:37.759
<v Speaker 1>that teams are are counting ballots appropriately. So you know,

0:39:37.840 --> 0:39:40.399
<v Speaker 1>I think I think it varies a little bit from

0:39:40.400 --> 0:39:42.800
<v Speaker 1>state to state, but but most states have a process

0:39:42.840 --> 0:39:45.560
<v Speaker 1>where there's already a bipartisan team who's supposed to be

0:39:45.640 --> 0:39:49.080
<v Speaker 1>there counting the ballot, especially with absentee valts, they have

0:39:49.080 --> 0:39:50.920
<v Speaker 1>to pull them out of the envelope and flatten them

0:39:50.920 --> 0:39:53.120
<v Speaker 1>out and run them through their machine. Um. And then

0:39:53.160 --> 0:39:56.040
<v Speaker 1>sometimes there's questions if the machine doesn't doesn't pick up

0:39:56.040 --> 0:39:58.239
<v Speaker 1>on it, is it because the ballot was torn or

0:39:58.320 --> 0:40:00.839
<v Speaker 1>miss or main gold or the different way? Did they

0:40:00.880 --> 0:40:03.080
<v Speaker 1>use red pen instead of black pen and the machine

0:40:03.080 --> 0:40:05.399
<v Speaker 1>didn't pick it up? And then there's some sort of question, well,

0:40:05.480 --> 0:40:07.480
<v Speaker 1>how do we count this ballot? And usually again that

0:40:07.480 --> 0:40:11.320
<v Speaker 1>bipartisan team reaches a consensus conclusion um. And so the

0:40:12.160 --> 0:40:14.520
<v Speaker 1>observers are there just to make sure that everyone sort

0:40:14.520 --> 0:40:16.719
<v Speaker 1>of complying with the law, that they're not sort of

0:40:16.719 --> 0:40:19.359
<v Speaker 1>throwing out a batch of ballots or they're including ones

0:40:19.440 --> 0:40:21.440
<v Speaker 1>that should have been excluded, and they can provide that

0:40:21.480 --> 0:40:25.000
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to challenge. But but once the sort of challenges

0:40:25.040 --> 0:40:26.920
<v Speaker 1>have sort of run their course and the ballots are

0:40:26.960 --> 0:40:29.319
<v Speaker 1>run through the machine and add into those totals. I mean,

0:40:29.600 --> 0:40:32.040
<v Speaker 1>it's really hard to unscramble the egg at that point, right,

0:40:32.600 --> 0:40:37.240
<v Speaker 1>unless you can prove something systemic fraudulent across the state

0:40:37.320 --> 0:40:40.080
<v Speaker 1>or in a broad way to undermine the election results,

0:40:40.480 --> 0:40:43.640
<v Speaker 1>um the totals of the totals. So Derek, you're listening

0:40:43.640 --> 0:40:45.200
<v Speaker 1>to that. I mean, it really gets down to the

0:40:45.239 --> 0:40:48.640
<v Speaker 1>nitty gritty, but it does, you know, it makes me

0:40:48.760 --> 0:40:51.160
<v Speaker 1>wonder as an American. And I thought about that because

0:40:51.200 --> 0:40:53.080
<v Speaker 1>I actually walked to the polls. I wanted to. I

0:40:53.239 --> 0:40:55.680
<v Speaker 1>like to see the process. But it does, you know,

0:40:55.719 --> 0:40:57.800
<v Speaker 1>get to the question and begs, you know, the question

0:40:57.880 --> 0:41:00.360
<v Speaker 1>of you know, how safe how a lie bull is

0:41:00.400 --> 0:41:02.600
<v Speaker 1>our election process? You know? And I don't know if

0:41:02.600 --> 0:41:05.760
<v Speaker 1>you can tell from past legal challenges and what's happening today,

0:41:05.800 --> 0:41:08.719
<v Speaker 1>but what is your take on that? Yeah, I mean

0:41:08.760 --> 0:41:12.280
<v Speaker 1>I think people feel pretty confident in the election systems

0:41:12.360 --> 0:41:14.880
<v Speaker 1>is safe and secure on the various levels, right. I mean,

0:41:14.880 --> 0:41:17.240
<v Speaker 1>we do the best we can. There's gonna be mistakes

0:41:17.239 --> 0:41:18.759
<v Speaker 1>and problems that happen, and I think you know that

0:41:18.800 --> 0:41:21.520
<v Speaker 1>press conference is a great illustration that, um, you know,

0:41:21.600 --> 0:41:24.440
<v Speaker 1>sometimes it's the wrong form of a ballot. And one

0:41:24.480 --> 0:41:26.279
<v Speaker 1>of the things in the United States that maybe is

0:41:26.680 --> 0:41:28.200
<v Speaker 1>a little different from other parts of the world. We

0:41:28.200 --> 0:41:31.120
<v Speaker 1>don't only just have fifty states running elections. In a

0:41:31.120 --> 0:41:33.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of places, it's really county or sometimes even at

0:41:33.640 --> 0:41:37.520
<v Speaker 1>local municipalities running elections, and they're making these decisions and

0:41:37.600 --> 0:41:40.600
<v Speaker 1>sometimes problems arise. So one of the things they talked

0:41:40.600 --> 0:41:43.120
<v Speaker 1>about in Georgia is there about four hundred ballots that

0:41:43.160 --> 0:41:44.759
<v Speaker 1>we're on the wrong kind of paper to run through

0:41:44.800 --> 0:41:47.120
<v Speaker 1>the machine, and so they have to duplicate them, which

0:41:47.160 --> 0:41:50.120
<v Speaker 1>is they get a bipartisan team together and they refill

0:41:50.160 --> 0:41:52.879
<v Speaker 1>out the ballots on a proper and a proper kind

0:41:52.920 --> 0:41:55.600
<v Speaker 1>of ballot they can run through the machine. Compare it

0:41:55.640 --> 0:41:57.520
<v Speaker 1>to the other one that everyone agrees that that was

0:41:57.560 --> 0:41:59.960
<v Speaker 1>the voters intent run through the machine, and we counted up.

0:42:00.080 --> 0:42:03.120
<v Speaker 1>So it's it's sometimes just a long slog to get

0:42:03.200 --> 0:42:05.440
<v Speaker 1>through this process. But I think, you know, for the

0:42:05.440 --> 0:42:08.440
<v Speaker 1>most part, we get over those hiccups. We make it through,

0:42:08.480 --> 0:42:10.440
<v Speaker 1>and we're gonna see we're gonna see a total h

0:42:10.600 --> 0:42:13.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, hopefully in the in the weeks that come.

0:42:13.920 --> 0:42:16.719
<v Speaker 1>I think the two thousand election educated the majority of

0:42:16.719 --> 0:42:20.440
<v Speaker 1>Americans about the electoral college and the popular vote, and

0:42:20.520 --> 0:42:23.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that this election is educating people about the

0:42:23.080 --> 0:42:27.480
<v Speaker 1>patchwork of different regulations Derek, in terms of every state

0:42:27.560 --> 0:42:30.080
<v Speaker 1>having a different process, and we've talked about the negatives

0:42:30.080 --> 0:42:33.520
<v Speaker 1>of that process, but it really does bear to keep

0:42:33.560 --> 0:42:36.680
<v Speaker 1>in mind about the benefits of that process. From the

0:42:36.800 --> 0:42:39.520
<v Speaker 1>national security perspective. I think back to before the two

0:42:39.560 --> 0:42:42.759
<v Speaker 1>thousand and eighteen mid terms when there was a widespread

0:42:42.800 --> 0:42:47.319
<v Speaker 1>briefing for the media of run by the nonpartisan intelligence

0:42:47.400 --> 0:42:51.640
<v Speaker 1>community officials, just as they elaborated upon the significant national

0:42:51.680 --> 0:42:57.120
<v Speaker 1>security risks that local governments, local municipalities actually face, and

0:42:57.120 --> 0:42:59.160
<v Speaker 1>that it makes it much more difficult for a hostile

0:42:59.200 --> 0:43:02.600
<v Speaker 1>foreign actor, there be Russia or iron or China, as

0:43:02.800 --> 0:43:06.160
<v Speaker 1>we've seen in this election, efforts to do so for

0:43:06.200 --> 0:43:09.920
<v Speaker 1>them to hack into a smaller system versus having to

0:43:09.960 --> 0:43:14.640
<v Speaker 1>do it for for one blanket uh uniform concrete systems.

0:43:14.680 --> 0:43:16.680
<v Speaker 1>So I think that that bears keeping in mind as

0:43:16.719 --> 0:43:19.160
<v Speaker 1>well when when all of this is said and done

0:43:19.280 --> 0:43:23.640
<v Speaker 1>from a legal perspective, Derek, and based upon history, what

0:43:23.880 --> 0:43:27.919
<v Speaker 1>has the previous elections, what was for example, the most

0:43:27.920 --> 0:43:32.040
<v Speaker 1>previously litigated election do we know, um, and and how

0:43:32.080 --> 0:43:36.560
<v Speaker 1>do you think this might change course for future elections? Yeah,

0:43:36.560 --> 0:43:39.360
<v Speaker 1>it's it's certainly interesting to think about the comparison of

0:43:39.480 --> 0:43:42.319
<v Speaker 1>pre election eight challenges and post election dight challenges. And

0:43:42.440 --> 0:43:45.440
<v Speaker 1>to be frank, I think this election will will blow

0:43:45.480 --> 0:43:49.400
<v Speaker 1>out all records on both fronts. On the on the

0:43:49.719 --> 0:43:52.160
<v Speaker 1>pre election side, right, COVID really did a number, I mean,

0:43:52.160 --> 0:43:56.200
<v Speaker 1>we had hundreds of lawsuits understatement of the year. COVID

0:43:56.280 --> 0:44:00.919
<v Speaker 1>really did a number, hundreds of them, right. Um, Now

0:44:00.920 --> 0:44:02.759
<v Speaker 1>it's worth you know, thinking about, you know, on the

0:44:02.800 --> 0:44:04.799
<v Speaker 1>post election day side of things. Yeah, I think the

0:44:04.800 --> 0:44:07.440
<v Speaker 1>Trump campaign again it's sort of flooding the airwaves with

0:44:07.520 --> 0:44:10.400
<v Speaker 1>sort of uh with with lawsuits all over the place

0:44:10.400 --> 0:44:12.840
<v Speaker 1>on a lot of a lot of matters. Something you know,

0:44:12.920 --> 0:44:15.399
<v Speaker 1>in Florida in two thousand we talked about Bush versus Gore,

0:44:15.480 --> 0:44:17.360
<v Speaker 1>but I mean there were you know, at least thirty

0:44:17.440 --> 0:44:21.719
<v Speaker 1>lawsuits filed at various stages by various folks voters, um,

0:44:21.760 --> 0:44:25.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, interested groups, federal court, state court all over

0:44:25.320 --> 0:44:28.399
<v Speaker 1>sort of challenging these things, challenging various sort of things.

0:44:28.480 --> 0:44:30.279
<v Speaker 1>You just kind of all got channeled into the one

0:44:30.320 --> 0:44:33.120
<v Speaker 1>case of Bush versus Gore that was the ultimate sort

0:44:33.120 --> 0:44:36.239
<v Speaker 1>of daniumon if you will, of what happened there. So UM,

0:44:36.360 --> 0:44:39.759
<v Speaker 1>it's it's interesting in the United States because elections have

0:44:39.840 --> 0:44:43.400
<v Speaker 1>traditionally been something reserved of the political process. To be frank,

0:44:43.440 --> 0:44:46.399
<v Speaker 1>if there were disputes about elections, UM, it was really

0:44:46.440 --> 0:44:49.520
<v Speaker 1>something that Congress resolved. Congress resolved the election of eighteen

0:44:49.560 --> 0:44:52.760
<v Speaker 1>seventy six, one of the most contested elections in American history.

0:44:53.080 --> 0:44:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Congress resolved the tie of the election in eighteen hundred

0:44:56.040 --> 0:44:59.279
<v Speaker 1>rights because it was it was that sort of a process.

0:44:59.320 --> 0:45:02.600
<v Speaker 1>But you know, since Bush versus Gore, we've increasingly looked

0:45:02.640 --> 0:45:04.960
<v Speaker 1>at litigation and said, you know, maybe that's you know,

0:45:04.960 --> 0:45:07.680
<v Speaker 1>that that's an attractive place rather to me thinking about

0:45:08.520 --> 0:45:10.799
<v Speaker 1>about how to resolve these disputes and whether it was

0:45:11.200 --> 0:45:14.560
<v Speaker 1>John Kerry's you know, attempt that never went through about

0:45:14.600 --> 0:45:18.560
<v Speaker 1>challenging Ohio in two thousand four, versus the recount efforts

0:45:18.600 --> 0:45:20.839
<v Speaker 1>by Jill Stein, you know, the Green Party candidate who

0:45:20.880 --> 0:45:24.760
<v Speaker 1>funded recounts in Wisconsin. In UM, there's sort of people

0:45:24.760 --> 0:45:26.520
<v Speaker 1>have been eyeing, you know, whether or not at the

0:45:26.600 --> 0:45:28.760
<v Speaker 1>right time for the next sort of stage of lawsuits,

0:45:28.800 --> 0:45:31.200
<v Speaker 1>and this is just I think, um, as the as

0:45:31.200 --> 0:45:34.320
<v Speaker 1>accounting drags on, we're just going to see Seymour lawsuits

0:45:34.320 --> 0:45:37.400
<v Speaker 1>sort of crop off. If that's the case. And Derek,

0:45:37.719 --> 0:45:41.120
<v Speaker 1>I just wonder your your reaction, because as I keep

0:45:41.160 --> 0:45:46.680
<v Speaker 1>watching all these many many little press conferences from local officials,

0:45:46.760 --> 0:45:51.720
<v Speaker 1>local election officials, it seems what impresses me is how

0:45:51.800 --> 0:45:54.680
<v Speaker 1>serious they are, how that everyone is taking this really

0:45:54.760 --> 0:45:57.680
<v Speaker 1>seriously and they're really trying to follow all the rules

0:45:57.680 --> 0:46:01.000
<v Speaker 1>and regulations. They haven't found any kind of fraud. They

0:46:01.040 --> 0:46:04.480
<v Speaker 1>haven't found an election worker who did something wrong or

0:46:04.600 --> 0:46:07.240
<v Speaker 1>ballots that were put in the wrong place. It seems

0:46:07.280 --> 0:46:10.279
<v Speaker 1>like they're really doing what they have to do, and

0:46:10.320 --> 0:46:13.839
<v Speaker 1>that that's why most of these lawsuits are going to

0:46:13.840 --> 0:46:17.040
<v Speaker 1>fail in the end. Yeah, So, I mean I think

0:46:17.520 --> 0:46:19.120
<v Speaker 1>at a high level, I think that's right. You know,

0:46:19.480 --> 0:46:22.720
<v Speaker 1>there's no question that we've seen instances of poll workers

0:46:22.760 --> 0:46:26.080
<v Speaker 1>who have committed fraud, right and those they happen, they're

0:46:26.080 --> 0:46:28.759
<v Speaker 1>out there, there's examples of it. They're they're rare, but

0:46:28.800 --> 0:46:31.880
<v Speaker 1>they're out there. Um, you know, ballots haven't been found.

0:46:31.920 --> 0:46:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Although to be fair, so far, it seems like in

0:46:34.560 --> 0:46:37.920
<v Speaker 1>places like Pennsylvania, they are stumbling across some they haven't

0:46:37.960 --> 0:46:42.120
<v Speaker 1>found earlier. But I mean again you here and there. Yeah,

0:46:42.400 --> 0:46:44.120
<v Speaker 1>but you have to think about the scope, right, Yeah,

0:46:44.120 --> 0:46:45.840
<v Speaker 1>we've had if there if some of these states have

0:46:45.920 --> 0:46:48.480
<v Speaker 1>been having mail in ballots for over a month. I mean,

0:46:48.520 --> 0:46:50.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how often you spent you step foot

0:46:50.640 --> 0:46:53.600
<v Speaker 1>into your local city hall or county government building. You know,

0:46:53.600 --> 0:46:56.319
<v Speaker 1>they're often sort of these older buildings where they're sort

0:46:56.360 --> 0:46:58.680
<v Speaker 1>of workers who are crammed on top of each other

0:46:58.760 --> 0:47:01.560
<v Speaker 1>and filing cabinets and in them closets in the basement, right,

0:47:01.600 --> 0:47:04.120
<v Speaker 1>and if you're getting stacks and stacks of mail, it

0:47:04.280 --> 0:47:06.960
<v Speaker 1>sometimes gets shoved aside if it was back September thirty

0:47:07.160 --> 0:47:09.040
<v Speaker 1>when you got this match. So it's it's a sort

0:47:09.080 --> 0:47:11.600
<v Speaker 1>of all the kinks in the process working themselves out

0:47:11.680 --> 0:47:15.040
<v Speaker 1>at this stage as we're trying to you know, the

0:47:15.120 --> 0:47:19.319
<v Speaker 1>perfect problems are just magnifying everything. Yeah. Yeah, you don't

0:47:19.320 --> 0:47:21.480
<v Speaker 1>have the staff in the building who are processing these

0:47:21.480 --> 0:47:24.160
<v Speaker 1>ballots are looking at them with that sort of regularity

0:47:24.200 --> 0:47:26.600
<v Speaker 1>in sight. Now, absolutely, I think, I think, But but

0:47:26.680 --> 0:47:28.600
<v Speaker 1>I think you're right, you've exactly had the nail in

0:47:28.640 --> 0:47:31.080
<v Speaker 1>the head that there hasn't been sort of an allegation

0:47:31.160 --> 0:47:33.839
<v Speaker 1>of sort of widespread fraud. Right, we don't see any

0:47:33.880 --> 0:47:37.319
<v Speaker 1>sort of evidence that there's someone's cooking the book somewhere. Um,

0:47:37.440 --> 0:47:40.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe we'll find an isolated incident or two

0:47:40.600 --> 0:47:43.200
<v Speaker 1>well after election day, but so far the process, I

0:47:43.200 --> 0:47:45.600
<v Speaker 1>think you're right. The local officials take it very seriously

0:47:45.640 --> 0:47:47.320
<v Speaker 1>and want to do the right thing. And let's remember,

0:47:47.360 --> 0:47:49.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, for many states, you know, mail in ballots,

0:47:49.840 --> 0:47:51.640
<v Speaker 1>they've been doing this for years, so they do have

0:47:51.680 --> 0:47:54.240
<v Speaker 1>those systems in place to be fair. Though the sheer

0:47:54.360 --> 0:47:57.440
<v Speaker 1>volume of the mail in ballots, uh this year has

0:47:57.480 --> 0:47:59.560
<v Speaker 1>certainly been something that I think a lot of folks

0:48:00.040 --> 0:48:03.200
<v Speaker 1>weren't necessarily used to. So, Uh, the counting continues. We're

0:48:03.200 --> 0:48:05.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna get back to this discussion in just a moment.

0:48:05.280 --> 0:48:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Do you want to remind everyone it is a Fed Thursday,

0:48:08.080 --> 0:48:11.680
<v Speaker 1>wrapping up a meeting today, the Federal Reserve keeping policy

0:48:11.760 --> 0:48:15.759
<v Speaker 1>steady rates on hold asset buying unchanged. Having said that,

0:48:15.800 --> 0:48:18.960
<v Speaker 1>we're just about forty minutes away from the closing bail

0:48:19.040 --> 0:48:21.560
<v Speaker 1>on this Thursday, and equities bouncing around a little bit,

0:48:21.600 --> 0:48:24.440
<v Speaker 1>but pretty steady and just off their highs of the session.

0:48:24.480 --> 0:48:26.879
<v Speaker 1>That accounts to or that amounts to about a two

0:48:26.880 --> 0:48:28.960
<v Speaker 1>percent gain on the S and P five hundred Dow

0:48:29.080 --> 0:48:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Jones Industrial Average up five hundred forty six points, also

0:48:32.200 --> 0:48:36.400
<v Speaker 1>up almost two percent, and the NASDAC definitely uh the outperformer.

0:48:36.520 --> 0:48:38.640
<v Speaker 1>The NASDAC up point than three hundred points, good for

0:48:38.640 --> 0:48:41.200
<v Speaker 1>a gain of two point six per cent. Alright, let's

0:48:41.200 --> 0:48:44.200
<v Speaker 1>get back to our discussion. So, Derek Mueller, I mean,

0:48:44.480 --> 0:48:48.680
<v Speaker 1>if you could change anything that to make this a

0:48:48.800 --> 0:48:52.759
<v Speaker 1>more secure process so that we don't necessarily have this

0:48:52.920 --> 0:48:57.319
<v Speaker 1>legal wrangling um or legal questions in the future, what

0:48:57.320 --> 0:48:58.960
<v Speaker 1>would we need to do because I think having brought

0:48:59.040 --> 0:49:01.600
<v Speaker 1>up a really smart, an important point that as we

0:49:01.640 --> 0:49:03.839
<v Speaker 1>try to keep our elections secure, that maybe they are

0:49:03.920 --> 0:49:07.360
<v Speaker 1>more secure you know by the states, you know, really

0:49:07.400 --> 0:49:11.880
<v Speaker 1>overseeing these processes. But it does create then a multitude

0:49:11.880 --> 0:49:14.960
<v Speaker 1>of systems right in the process. So how could we

0:49:15.040 --> 0:49:19.279
<v Speaker 1>make it better and safer maybe or more uh reassuring

0:49:19.360 --> 0:49:22.239
<v Speaker 1>if you will, on a legal basis. Yeah, I think

0:49:22.280 --> 0:49:24.640
<v Speaker 1>there's a few things for us to think about going forward,

0:49:24.680 --> 0:49:27.120
<v Speaker 1>and I would hope you know. The problem is they're

0:49:27.120 --> 0:49:29.200
<v Speaker 1>they're sort of the bipartisan efforts, but they often get

0:49:29.200 --> 0:49:32.680
<v Speaker 1>swallowed up in the partisan efforts as Congress wants to

0:49:32.719 --> 0:49:34.640
<v Speaker 1>do sort of what their side wants, whether it's a

0:49:34.680 --> 0:49:38.120
<v Speaker 1>voter I D or or you know, whatever it might be. UM.

0:49:38.160 --> 0:49:40.479
<v Speaker 1>I think first, you know, despite the fact that there's

0:49:40.480 --> 0:49:44.080
<v Speaker 1>this decentralization, the Election Assistance Commission with the Department of

0:49:44.080 --> 0:49:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Homeland Security and and UH, Director of National Intelligence and

0:49:47.880 --> 0:49:50.920
<v Speaker 1>others have really worked very hard to help think about

0:49:50.960 --> 0:49:53.600
<v Speaker 1>making sure that our critical systems infrastructure in the United

0:49:53.640 --> 0:49:56.000
<v Speaker 1>States is secure, that it's going to be resilient in

0:49:56.040 --> 0:49:59.239
<v Speaker 1>the phase of attack. That they're certifying election systems and

0:49:59.360 --> 0:50:02.959
<v Speaker 1>ensuring that while states have choices, their choices within sort

0:50:02.960 --> 0:50:05.279
<v Speaker 1>of a suite or a variety of options. So I

0:50:05.320 --> 0:50:08.200
<v Speaker 1>think that's that's one important thing to think about going forward,

0:50:08.200 --> 0:50:11.360
<v Speaker 1>whether that there should be some maybe more uniformity, but

0:50:11.440 --> 0:50:13.600
<v Speaker 1>really more just sort of oversight to ensure that the

0:50:13.640 --> 0:50:16.480
<v Speaker 1>states are doing this appropriately. Another thing is we think

0:50:16.520 --> 0:50:19.440
<v Speaker 1>about the sort of ballot processing thing with with you know,

0:50:19.480 --> 0:50:21.520
<v Speaker 1>these states. You know, one of the problems that happened

0:50:21.640 --> 0:50:25.520
<v Speaker 1>is especially in Wisconsin and Pennsylvania, you had Republican legislatures

0:50:25.520 --> 0:50:28.960
<v Speaker 1>with Democratic governors really fighting fighting a lot about about

0:50:29.000 --> 0:50:33.560
<v Speaker 1>this process, including the process of UM processing ballots ahead

0:50:33.560 --> 0:50:36.840
<v Speaker 1>of election day. States like Florida after two thousand really

0:50:36.880 --> 0:50:40.440
<v Speaker 1>got their act together. They they they let up, you know, uh,

0:50:40.760 --> 0:50:43.440
<v Speaker 1>clerks start looking at the ballots early, not not to

0:50:43.520 --> 0:50:45.520
<v Speaker 1>count them, just to make sure that the voters are

0:50:45.520 --> 0:50:50.279
<v Speaker 1>eligible and that the signatures match and everything right. That

0:50:51.960 --> 0:50:54.480
<v Speaker 1>was good. I mean, if you saw Governor Jeb Bush

0:50:54.480 --> 0:50:57.200
<v Speaker 1>tweeted out, you know, yesterday that he was glad they

0:50:57.200 --> 0:51:00.640
<v Speaker 1>got their act together and fixed things. Um. So I think,

0:51:00.719 --> 0:51:02.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think there might be a place in

0:51:02.200 --> 0:51:04.320
<v Speaker 1>the United States to think about some of these little

0:51:04.360 --> 0:51:08.839
<v Speaker 1>tweaks about you know, maybe encouraging states because Congress has

0:51:08.920 --> 0:51:12.080
<v Speaker 1>robust authority both in terms of giving states cash to

0:51:12.160 --> 0:51:16.400
<v Speaker 1>run elections and in its elections authority for congressional elections

0:51:16.440 --> 0:51:18.680
<v Speaker 1>to say you should start, you know, opening in the

0:51:18.760 --> 0:51:21.400
<v Speaker 1>non envelopes, you know, the Friday before the election, Like

0:51:21.480 --> 0:51:23.440
<v Speaker 1>that's a that's a standard we're going to put in place.

0:51:23.480 --> 0:51:26.359
<v Speaker 1>And I think some of these standards could be non

0:51:26.360 --> 0:51:29.440
<v Speaker 1>controversial bipartisan solutions. Um. There's just going to be a

0:51:29.480 --> 0:51:32.480
<v Speaker 1>question of whether there there's an appetite for that in Washington,

0:51:32.520 --> 0:51:37.239
<v Speaker 1>d C. So I heard some people say, I don't

0:51:37.280 --> 0:51:39.760
<v Speaker 1>remember where it came from. I can't give anyone credit

0:51:40.200 --> 0:51:44.360
<v Speaker 1>that the postmark, the postmark, that smudge is going to

0:51:44.400 --> 0:51:49.080
<v Speaker 1>be the hanging chat of the elections. Have you seen that,

0:51:49.280 --> 0:51:51.279
<v Speaker 1>because that can be a factor in a lot of

0:51:51.280 --> 0:51:54.440
<v Speaker 1>these states. Yeah. And even more to the point, the

0:51:54.560 --> 0:51:57.320
<v Speaker 1>one case that you know still lingering before the Supreme

0:51:57.360 --> 0:52:00.399
<v Speaker 1>Court is out of Pennsylvania, where they would accept those

0:52:00.440 --> 0:52:03.880
<v Speaker 1>ballots postmarked on election Day up through tomorrow Friday, but

0:52:03.960 --> 0:52:07.840
<v Speaker 1>also those ballots that don't have a postmark at all. Right, Um,

0:52:07.880 --> 0:52:11.400
<v Speaker 1>I think rethinking how the Postal Service handles ballots, and

0:52:11.440 --> 0:52:13.600
<v Speaker 1>not just in volume, but in terms of the speed

0:52:13.640 --> 0:52:16.840
<v Speaker 1>of delivery and so on is another sort of pressing

0:52:16.880 --> 0:52:19.560
<v Speaker 1>concern for the next Postmaster General or for Congress and

0:52:19.600 --> 0:52:22.560
<v Speaker 1>its oversight function. Um. You know, Congress had some hearings

0:52:22.560 --> 0:52:25.800
<v Speaker 1>where they sort of dragooned the Postmaster General that to

0:52:25.880 --> 0:52:28.640
<v Speaker 1>sort of fight about this stuff late summer. Um, there's

0:52:28.680 --> 0:52:30.880
<v Speaker 1>a federal jodge in Washington, d C. Who's sort of

0:52:30.880 --> 0:52:33.359
<v Speaker 1>been micromanaging the Postal Service sort of on a day

0:52:33.360 --> 0:52:35.839
<v Speaker 1>by day basis. Um. You know, those are not long

0:52:35.960 --> 0:52:37.960
<v Speaker 1>term solutions and they're not sort of in the benefit

0:52:38.040 --> 0:52:42.360
<v Speaker 1>of the national interest. Right, So I'm not a postal

0:52:42.440 --> 0:52:44.880
<v Speaker 1>service expert, far from it, but it is something I

0:52:44.920 --> 0:52:48.000
<v Speaker 1>think that will require a little bit of oversight, you know,

0:52:48.080 --> 0:52:51.480
<v Speaker 1>going forward. Yeah, well that's for sure you might have

0:52:51.560 --> 0:52:56.719
<v Speaker 1>to become one maybe maybe. Alright, good to leave it

0:52:56.719 --> 0:52:58.640
<v Speaker 1>on that now, Derek, thank you so much. I'll appreciated.

0:52:58.680 --> 0:53:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Derek Muller, Professor of Law, University of Iowa College of Law,

0:53:02.440 --> 0:53:05.279
<v Speaker 1>joining us on the phone from Iowa City, Iowa. This

0:53:05.640 --> 0:53:10.000
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Masser from Bloomberg Radio. Well,

0:53:10.000 --> 0:53:13.080
<v Speaker 1>this election, once again we saw a Democratic presidential candidate

0:53:13.080 --> 0:53:15.960
<v Speaker 1>collecting more popular votes than his Republican opponent. We know

0:53:16.080 --> 0:53:19.880
<v Speaker 1>it's not over yet, where of course contingent and watching

0:53:19.960 --> 0:53:22.239
<v Speaker 1>what happens when it comes to the electoral college. But

0:53:22.280 --> 0:53:24.239
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to the popular vote, you know, it

0:53:24.320 --> 0:53:27.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of begs a question, why can't Republicans win that

0:53:27.800 --> 0:53:31.520
<v Speaker 1>popular vote? Writing about it is Bloomberg opinion columnist Jonathan

0:53:31.600 --> 0:53:33.960
<v Speaker 1>burst Bernstein. He kind of asked that question in his

0:53:34.040 --> 0:53:37.080
<v Speaker 1>latest column. He covers and writes about politics and policy.

0:53:37.120 --> 0:53:39.840
<v Speaker 1>He's taught about it at the University of Texas and

0:53:39.880 --> 0:53:44.480
<v Speaker 1>San Antonio. He joins us on the phone from San Antonio, Texas. Jonathan,

0:53:44.520 --> 0:53:47.400
<v Speaker 1>good to have you here with Kevin and June and myself.

0:53:47.880 --> 0:53:50.200
<v Speaker 1>First of all, give us some history when it comes

0:53:50.200 --> 0:53:54.440
<v Speaker 1>to the popular vote and Republicans. Well, Democrats have now

0:53:54.520 --> 0:53:56.480
<v Speaker 1>won the popular and you're gonna, I expect you're gonna

0:53:56.520 --> 0:53:59.560
<v Speaker 1>hear a lot of this from Democrats in the next

0:53:59.600 --> 0:54:04.480
<v Speaker 1>several weeks. Um. From up through this year, Democrats have

0:54:04.600 --> 0:54:07.200
<v Speaker 1>won the popular vote in all but one time, seven

0:54:07.200 --> 0:54:09.160
<v Speaker 1>out of eight, which is the best streak anybody, any

0:54:09.160 --> 0:54:12.160
<v Speaker 1>party has ever had in US history. So it's it's

0:54:12.160 --> 0:54:16.440
<v Speaker 1>pretty impressive in just on the raw note numbers itself,

0:54:16.719 --> 0:54:18.640
<v Speaker 1>when you look at them more carefully. One of the

0:54:18.680 --> 0:54:20.560
<v Speaker 1>things I said in the column is, you know, it

0:54:20.719 --> 0:54:22.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of breaks down a little bit. Some of them

0:54:22.760 --> 0:54:25.359
<v Speaker 1>they weren't weren't a lot of runaway wins as there

0:54:25.360 --> 0:54:28.640
<v Speaker 1>were forced a Republicans during the Reagan Bush era, Nixon

0:54:29.040 --> 0:54:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Reagan era, UM. And you know, had Democrats taken the presidency,

0:54:35.360 --> 0:54:38.000
<v Speaker 1>say in in two thousand, one hour or one a

0:54:38.120 --> 0:54:41.000
<v Speaker 1>very very narrow popular vote margin, they might well have

0:54:41.080 --> 0:54:44.000
<v Speaker 1>lost it, say in eight, and you might have had

0:54:44.040 --> 0:54:47.200
<v Speaker 1>a couple of big Republican wins. So one thing I'm

0:54:47.200 --> 0:54:52.920
<v Speaker 1>saying is it may not be all that it really seems. So, Jonathan,

0:54:52.960 --> 0:54:57.280
<v Speaker 1>are you saying that, what's your opinion about whether the

0:54:57.320 --> 0:55:01.440
<v Speaker 1>presidential vote, because of the elector all vote, it doesn't

0:55:01.480 --> 0:55:05.000
<v Speaker 1>match the popular vote, and whether there should be changes

0:55:05.040 --> 0:55:09.160
<v Speaker 1>in the system so that the popular vote does mirror

0:55:09.200 --> 0:55:12.040
<v Speaker 1>who the president is. Well, it's a great question because

0:55:12.280 --> 0:55:15.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, traditionally in the United States history, there hasn't

0:55:15.080 --> 0:55:18.920
<v Speaker 1>been this split that we saw in the when Trump

0:55:18.920 --> 0:55:23.080
<v Speaker 1>got elected. Um, usually the winner of the electoral college

0:55:23.080 --> 0:55:24.840
<v Speaker 1>is the winner of the popular vote. It's only happened

0:55:24.840 --> 0:55:27.720
<v Speaker 1>a handful of time, however, two of those were fairly

0:55:27.719 --> 0:55:31.560
<v Speaker 1>recent in two thousand. Even then, though in two thousand

0:55:31.640 --> 0:55:34.799
<v Speaker 1>it was basically a tie both ways, so there wasn't

0:55:34.800 --> 0:55:37.080
<v Speaker 1>that much of a thing there. Um, it looks like

0:55:37.160 --> 0:55:40.279
<v Speaker 1>this time the electoral college is probably gonna wind up

0:55:40.600 --> 0:55:43.360
<v Speaker 1>on the same side as the popular vote. So you know,

0:55:43.520 --> 0:55:46.000
<v Speaker 1>it makes a lot of people like a big fuss

0:55:46.040 --> 0:55:48.279
<v Speaker 1>about it. There's a good case to be made that

0:55:48.320 --> 0:55:50.920
<v Speaker 1>we shouldn't have the electoral college, but most of the

0:55:50.920 --> 0:55:54.920
<v Speaker 1>time it doesn't actually make that big difference. So in

0:55:55.040 --> 0:55:57.120
<v Speaker 1>terms of where things go though, and I just want

0:55:57.120 --> 0:55:59.319
<v Speaker 1>to catch everybody up to speed, because we have we

0:55:59.360 --> 0:56:02.799
<v Speaker 1>do have some some new developments. According to CBS News,

0:56:02.800 --> 0:56:06.799
<v Speaker 1>CBS is reporting that Jared Kushner is looking for there

0:56:06.840 --> 0:56:11.280
<v Speaker 1>to be some type of spokesperson for the president's legal team,

0:56:11.320 --> 0:56:14.239
<v Speaker 1>akin to James Baker, that they're looking for and we

0:56:14.239 --> 0:56:16.360
<v Speaker 1>should also know. And I think this is really important

0:56:16.360 --> 0:56:18.799
<v Speaker 1>folks to keep in mind as we have these conversations

0:56:19.080 --> 0:56:21.720
<v Speaker 1>about the legal cases, as we also have these cases

0:56:22.160 --> 0:56:25.960
<v Speaker 1>they have the conversation about the electoral college, is that,

0:56:26.440 --> 0:56:31.760
<v Speaker 1>in essence, one of the president's entire strategy right now

0:56:32.040 --> 0:56:34.399
<v Speaker 1>is dependent upon whether or not this thing comes down

0:56:34.400 --> 0:56:37.040
<v Speaker 1>to one or two states. Right now, it's there's a

0:56:37.080 --> 0:56:39.959
<v Speaker 1>handful of states where the votes haven't been counted. Whether

0:56:40.000 --> 0:56:43.279
<v Speaker 1>it's Arizona, Americopa County, which has been trending left and

0:56:43.560 --> 0:56:46.480
<v Speaker 1>some networks have called for the Democrats. If it's out

0:56:46.480 --> 0:56:49.280
<v Speaker 1>in Arizona, uh there, it's coming down to Clark County.

0:56:49.480 --> 0:56:53.399
<v Speaker 1>But you've also got North Carolina, Georgia, Pennsylvania. And if

0:56:53.400 --> 0:56:57.920
<v Speaker 1>it if it sounds a little bit discombobulate, discombobulated, it's

0:56:57.920 --> 0:57:00.720
<v Speaker 1>because it is. And when I talk to sources Jonathan

0:57:00.719 --> 0:57:04.080
<v Speaker 1>burn Steen on the president's reelection campaign. They're not even

0:57:04.200 --> 0:57:06.719
<v Speaker 1>right now all speaking from the same talking points or

0:57:06.800 --> 0:57:10.279
<v Speaker 1>from the same legal playbook because they don't know which

0:57:10.320 --> 0:57:13.680
<v Speaker 1>specific lawsuit in order to come down with. So how

0:57:13.800 --> 0:57:17.640
<v Speaker 1>is that muddying the waters of the president's argument? Just

0:57:17.680 --> 0:57:20.920
<v Speaker 1>from an analytical standpoint, not a political one, and analytical

0:57:20.960 --> 0:57:24.720
<v Speaker 1>standpoint about why there's so much confusion right now around

0:57:24.720 --> 0:57:27.640
<v Speaker 1>the president's strategy. And Jonathan just got about a minute here,

0:57:28.240 --> 0:57:31.080
<v Speaker 1>that's pretty simple. There is no strength to the president's

0:57:31.240 --> 0:57:34.800
<v Speaker 1>legal argument. There just isn't. Um. You know, the votes

0:57:34.800 --> 0:57:37.720
<v Speaker 1>are proceeding normally. Um, this is how it's supposed to

0:57:37.720 --> 0:57:41.640
<v Speaker 1>work in many cases, for example Pennsylvania. It's working slowly

0:57:41.720 --> 0:57:44.480
<v Speaker 1>because Republicans set it up to work slowly. But the

0:57:44.520 --> 0:57:46.560
<v Speaker 1>truth is, at the end of the day, the president

0:57:46.560 --> 0:57:49.160
<v Speaker 1>doesn't really have much legal case, and if the states

0:57:49.200 --> 0:57:51.520
<v Speaker 1>go the way it looks like they will, it's he's

0:57:51.560 --> 0:57:54.640
<v Speaker 1>not going to have a very practical chance, even if

0:57:54.640 --> 0:57:57.360
<v Speaker 1>the courts were very generous to him. Maybe that's why

0:57:57.400 --> 0:58:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Rudy Giuliani is making the statements for the legal team

0:58:00.960 --> 0:58:03.640
<v Speaker 1>instead of Baker. Yeah, I mean the other half of

0:58:03.680 --> 0:58:05.600
<v Speaker 1>this is that the president seems to be doing his

0:58:05.720 --> 0:58:08.840
<v Speaker 1>legal close election strategy the same way, the same sort

0:58:08.840 --> 0:58:12.160
<v Speaker 1>of half asked away he does policy in the White House,

0:58:12.240 --> 0:58:14.640
<v Speaker 1>So you know that's what you get, Hey, Jonathan, I

0:58:14.640 --> 0:58:17.520
<v Speaker 1>want to pick up on something Um Kevin mentioned, and

0:58:17.520 --> 0:58:20.439
<v Speaker 1>we were talking about just the inability of really even

0:58:20.440 --> 0:58:23.280
<v Speaker 1>the Republican Party to kind of all be on the

0:58:23.320 --> 0:58:26.560
<v Speaker 1>same page. And I wonder, And we've got a story

0:58:26.600 --> 0:58:28.800
<v Speaker 1>coming up a little bit later on. It's the cover

0:58:28.880 --> 0:58:31.720
<v Speaker 1>of the magazine about Trump is Um and just Donald

0:58:31.760 --> 0:58:34.959
<v Speaker 1>Trump's impact on politics and the Republican Party. No matter

0:58:35.040 --> 0:58:37.520
<v Speaker 1>what happens in terms of the White House, it's here

0:58:37.560 --> 0:58:40.240
<v Speaker 1>to stay. But I do wonder about the inability of

0:58:40.280 --> 0:58:43.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe all Republicans to kind of feel the same way

0:58:43.640 --> 0:58:48.360
<v Speaker 1>about the direction of the party impacts that popular vote. Well,

0:58:48.400 --> 0:58:50.880
<v Speaker 1>you know what I would say is hurting the party

0:58:50.920 --> 0:58:54.320
<v Speaker 1>more than anything else, is that the president's um that

0:58:54.360 --> 0:58:57.480
<v Speaker 1>they've had have had a real difficult time staying popular

0:58:57.520 --> 0:58:59.480
<v Speaker 1>because they've had a real difficult time governing. You know,

0:58:59.480 --> 0:59:03.080
<v Speaker 1>if you look at Donald Trump, he's been below water

0:59:03.200 --> 0:59:06.440
<v Speaker 1>for four years in his approval ratings. The last pub

0:59:06.480 --> 0:59:09.720
<v Speaker 1>looking president before that, George W. Bush, was briefly very

0:59:09.800 --> 0:59:12.919
<v Speaker 1>very popular after the September eleventh of text. Let them

0:59:12.960 --> 0:59:16.640
<v Speaker 1>spent the last four five years of his administration, of

0:59:16.680 --> 0:59:19.360
<v Speaker 1>his two terms underwater, he was able to win re election.

0:59:19.600 --> 0:59:22.080
<v Speaker 1>We have the majority of the popular vote, only one

0:59:22.080 --> 0:59:25.440
<v Speaker 1>who's done it. But he still was unpopular. So you know,

0:59:25.480 --> 0:59:28.880
<v Speaker 1>Republican presidents have been unpopular their last nine years in office.

0:59:29.240 --> 0:59:31.439
<v Speaker 1>If you add in the last year of the first

0:59:31.520 --> 0:59:34.280
<v Speaker 1>George Bush, they've been unpopular for I don't know. I

0:59:34.400 --> 0:59:39.800
<v Speaker 1>got to interrupt though, because he's got approval rating with Republicans, Jonathan,

0:59:40.040 --> 0:59:44.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the president held together the Republican Party, so

0:59:44.520 --> 0:59:46.280
<v Speaker 1>I hear you on the sense. I mean, look, he

0:59:46.560 --> 0:59:48.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's it's still he he has a very

0:59:48.800 --> 0:59:52.240
<v Speaker 1>real chance of losing re election. But Republicans picked up

0:59:52.280 --> 0:59:55.240
<v Speaker 1>seven seats in the House. Mitch McConnell, we were all talking,

0:59:55.240 --> 0:59:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Oh is Amy McGrath gonna upset Mitch McConnell on track

0:59:58.640 --> 1:00:01.480
<v Speaker 1>would potentially be the lead d of the of the

1:00:01.560 --> 1:00:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Senate again. Lindsey Graham won re election. JOONI earns despite Trump,

1:00:07.480 --> 1:00:10.240
<v Speaker 1>but I gotta I gotta tell you this is such

1:00:10.280 --> 1:00:13.080
<v Speaker 1>and I gotta really be candid here. When I talked

1:00:13.120 --> 1:00:17.160
<v Speaker 1>to Republicans This conversation that we're having is totally divorced

1:00:17.160 --> 1:00:19.919
<v Speaker 1>from I'm gonna say reality, because there are so many

1:00:19.960 --> 1:00:23.360
<v Speaker 1>Republicans that I talked with who say, even if President

1:00:23.400 --> 1:00:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Trump doesn't win re election, that the way he's changed

1:00:26.280 --> 1:00:30.360
<v Speaker 1>this party on trade policy, on manufacturing, on foreign policy

1:00:30.480 --> 1:00:33.760
<v Speaker 1>has totally He is the new Republican establishment, whether people

1:00:33.800 --> 1:00:36.640
<v Speaker 1>like it or not. And that's just the fact that

1:00:36.720 --> 1:00:39.240
<v Speaker 1>made me true. That's that's separate from the question of

1:00:39.480 --> 1:00:41.680
<v Speaker 1>is he popular among the population at large? And the

1:00:41.720 --> 1:00:44.360
<v Speaker 1>truth is he isn't. And you know, he wasn't in

1:00:44.840 --> 1:00:50.720
<v Speaker 1>sixteen managed to fluke out of electrical college vote win. Anyway,

1:00:51.000 --> 1:00:53.720
<v Speaker 1>he isn't in He's gonna wind up losing by a

1:00:53.840 --> 1:00:59.160
<v Speaker 1>larger majority in the on the popular vote. And you know,

1:00:59.760 --> 1:01:01.880
<v Speaker 1>he is really popular among the Republican Party. They had

1:01:01.960 --> 1:01:05.800
<v Speaker 1>huge turnout this time. That's to his credit. But you know,

1:01:05.880 --> 1:01:08.160
<v Speaker 1>at least that shows that he's very popular within his party.

1:01:08.200 --> 1:01:11.680
<v Speaker 1>But beyond sort of that group, you know, yes, he's

1:01:11.800 --> 1:01:16.760
<v Speaker 1>very popular with his strong supporters. Beyond that, not so much. Jonathan,

1:01:17.640 --> 1:01:21.520
<v Speaker 1>what's your take on let's say Trump loses the election,

1:01:22.280 --> 1:01:25.880
<v Speaker 1>will he go away? Will he leave the political scene

1:01:25.960 --> 1:01:29.960
<v Speaker 1>or will he continue to dominate the Republican Party. You

1:01:30.000 --> 1:01:32.760
<v Speaker 1>know that you have to get inside somebody's heads. So

1:01:33.120 --> 1:01:35.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that any of us can answer that.

1:01:35.280 --> 1:01:37.640
<v Speaker 1>I do think that it's absolutely true there he has

1:01:37.960 --> 1:01:40.480
<v Speaker 1>very very strong supporters. So if he wants to, he

1:01:40.680 --> 1:01:43.040
<v Speaker 1>very well could you know, be the dominant voice in

1:01:43.080 --> 1:01:46.240
<v Speaker 1>the Republican Party for the next four years um, assuming

1:01:46.280 --> 1:01:49.240
<v Speaker 1>he loses, and he very well could run for the

1:01:49.400 --> 1:01:53.200
<v Speaker 1>presidency again and perhaps even get the nomination. That is

1:01:53.280 --> 1:01:55.360
<v Speaker 1>very hard to help because it mostly depends on what

1:01:55.440 --> 1:01:57.800
<v Speaker 1>he himself decides to do. Is he is that what

1:01:57.880 --> 1:01:59.600
<v Speaker 1>he wants to do with his life at you know,

1:01:59.680 --> 1:02:01.800
<v Speaker 1>his care an age in the current situation, or not.

1:02:01.920 --> 1:02:04.600
<v Speaker 1>And it's very hard to tell. If it's not him,

1:02:04.640 --> 1:02:07.840
<v Speaker 1>there'll be somebody who, you know, there'll be a series

1:02:07.880 --> 1:02:10.400
<v Speaker 1>of people, some of whom will sound more or less

1:02:10.400 --> 1:02:12.720
<v Speaker 1>like him. But I don't think anybody's gonna sound exactly

1:02:12.720 --> 1:02:16.120
<v Speaker 1>like Donald Trump. But I think it's I think it's

1:02:16.120 --> 1:02:19.320
<v Speaker 1>really interesting in the sense. But and I know people

1:02:19.320 --> 1:02:21.360
<v Speaker 1>who are listening are gonna, you know, don't swerve off

1:02:21.400 --> 1:02:23.960
<v Speaker 1>the road. But I think what the Republican Party is

1:02:23.960 --> 1:02:25.240
<v Speaker 1>going to have to decide and I don't want to

1:02:25.240 --> 1:02:28.280
<v Speaker 1>get too far in hypotheticals while people are still counting votes.

1:02:28.520 --> 1:02:32.760
<v Speaker 1>But regardless of any time a presidential nominee loses the election,

1:02:33.080 --> 1:02:35.920
<v Speaker 1>will the same thing happen to Donald Trump what happened

1:02:35.920 --> 1:02:38.479
<v Speaker 1>to Hillary Clinton, which was there was a freezing out

1:02:38.480 --> 1:02:41.200
<v Speaker 1>of Hillary Clinton. And and I think it's going to

1:02:41.280 --> 1:02:44.440
<v Speaker 1>be more difficult for Republicans to really do this, especially

1:02:44.760 --> 1:02:47.400
<v Speaker 1>when you look at a key battleground state like Florida

1:02:47.640 --> 1:02:52.200
<v Speaker 1>that Trump won, Ohio which he won and and look,

1:02:52.320 --> 1:02:55.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean there's an argument to be made that again,

1:02:56.240 --> 1:02:59.760
<v Speaker 1>he was able to defeat the Bush contingency of the

1:03:00.000 --> 1:03:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Publican Party in the primary, and so he's in there.

1:03:03.200 --> 1:03:06.320
<v Speaker 1>He's in there to stay. I just I don't see

1:03:06.400 --> 1:03:08.920
<v Speaker 1>him going away, based upon my reporting for the past

1:03:08.920 --> 1:03:13.040
<v Speaker 1>several years, I do not see it. Folks. He's getting old, though, Ken,

1:03:13.760 --> 1:03:17.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, your sons are his sons are his daughter

1:03:17.600 --> 1:03:21.040
<v Speaker 1>is different. That's a different story now that that's a

1:03:21.080 --> 1:03:23.640
<v Speaker 1>good question. I mean, Jonathan, Jonathan, do you see a

1:03:23.760 --> 1:03:27.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of a Trump political legacy here or or or

1:03:27.280 --> 1:03:30.600
<v Speaker 1>you know what? I think one of the key variables

1:03:30.720 --> 1:03:33.360
<v Speaker 1>is and it's it's something we don't know is what

1:03:33.640 --> 1:03:38.440
<v Speaker 1>will conservative Republican aligned media do if Trump, you know,

1:03:38.480 --> 1:03:40.640
<v Speaker 1>assuming Trump loses, which is what it looks like going

1:03:40.680 --> 1:03:43.760
<v Speaker 1>to happen. Um, will they decide to give him and

1:03:43.880 --> 1:03:47.800
<v Speaker 1>his family and his strongest you know, his former White

1:03:47.840 --> 1:03:50.400
<v Speaker 1>House eights and all that their platform or are they're

1:03:50.400 --> 1:03:52.000
<v Speaker 1>going to move on? And I think that that has

1:03:52.040 --> 1:03:55.000
<v Speaker 1>to do with some individuals and what they think, and

1:03:55.080 --> 1:03:59.440
<v Speaker 1>has to do with some profit questions with various media outlets,

1:03:59.760 --> 1:04:02.600
<v Speaker 1>and you know, I think, yeah, that's who The key

1:04:02.680 --> 1:04:05.400
<v Speaker 1>variable is not so much the politicians, not so much

1:04:05.480 --> 1:04:09.120
<v Speaker 1>rank and file Republicans, but the people who make Republican

1:04:09.160 --> 1:04:11.959
<v Speaker 1>aligned media. What are they going to think? Because he's

1:04:11.960 --> 1:04:14.440
<v Speaker 1>been a money maker for them, they may stick with him,

1:04:14.480 --> 1:04:17.120
<v Speaker 1>but they may also decide to move on. It's hard

1:04:17.160 --> 1:04:19.640
<v Speaker 1>to tell. It's gonna be interesting to see what the

1:04:19.680 --> 1:04:22.760
<v Speaker 1>progressive media does as well, especially you know, when you've

1:04:22.800 --> 1:04:25.240
<v Speaker 1>got it should bide and ultimately when I mean, how

1:04:25.280 --> 1:04:27.240
<v Speaker 1>do they cover AO see, how do they cover the

1:04:27.240 --> 1:04:29.480
<v Speaker 1>far left and the democratic socialist movement? I don't think

1:04:29.480 --> 1:04:31.400
<v Speaker 1>we know that, Carol, No, I don't think we know

1:04:31.480 --> 1:04:33.480
<v Speaker 1>that either, right and time will certainly tell on that.

1:04:33.520 --> 1:04:35.720
<v Speaker 1>I also do think it's interesting and kind of provocative,

1:04:36.040 --> 1:04:37.840
<v Speaker 1>I know, reading in this morning, Kevin, I don't know

1:04:37.840 --> 1:04:40.200
<v Speaker 1>if you saw a June or Jonathan. You know this

1:04:40.360 --> 1:04:43.520
<v Speaker 1>whole idea that if indeed President Trump doesn't get a

1:04:43.560 --> 1:04:47.080
<v Speaker 1>second term, now does he come back in four years? Right?

1:04:47.120 --> 1:04:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Which is which is? Which is a possibility. I mean,

1:04:50.080 --> 1:04:52.040
<v Speaker 1>we are definitely living in interesting times, and I do

1:04:52.160 --> 1:04:55.040
<v Speaker 1>wonder about what is the soul of the Republican Party

1:04:55.080 --> 1:04:57.400
<v Speaker 1>because I agree with you, Kevin that, I mean there's

1:04:57.400 --> 1:05:00.320
<v Speaker 1>been nobody like it feels like Donald Trump, who has

1:05:00.440 --> 1:05:03.720
<v Speaker 1>really kind of riled up the base. Yeah, and then

1:05:03.880 --> 1:05:08.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I just keep going back to approval rating

1:05:08.600 --> 1:05:11.560
<v Speaker 1>amongst the about all the Republicans he's lost though, Kevin,

1:05:11.560 --> 1:05:14.280
<v Speaker 1>think about the Lincoln Project and all these died in

1:05:14.280 --> 1:05:17.000
<v Speaker 1>the wool Republicans who have turned against the party because

1:05:17.000 --> 1:05:19.040
<v Speaker 1>of him. But it's interesting to look at them turn

1:05:19.080 --> 1:05:21.040
<v Speaker 1>out and just see how many have been riled up

1:05:21.080 --> 1:05:23.560
<v Speaker 1>and how many have come who hadn't maybe voted for years,

1:05:23.560 --> 1:05:27.120
<v Speaker 1>that showed up. I'm sorry, Kevin. Yeah, And I'll just

1:05:27.160 --> 1:05:28.920
<v Speaker 1>say I think I think that we've we talked a

1:05:28.960 --> 1:05:31.680
<v Speaker 1>lot about the Republicans, but there's no question Democrats are

1:05:31.680 --> 1:05:33.880
<v Speaker 1>going to have some party reconciliation to do as well.

1:05:33.960 --> 1:05:36.120
<v Speaker 1>All right, gotta leave it there, um, Jonathan. Thank you

1:05:36.200 --> 1:05:39.160
<v Speaker 1>so much, Bloomberg opinion columnist Jonathan Bernstein. Check out his

1:05:39.240 --> 1:05:41.920
<v Speaker 1>latest column. He can find it on the Bloomberg terminal,

1:05:41.960 --> 1:05:44.240
<v Speaker 1>of course, always at Bloomberg dot com. Joining us on

1:05:44.280 --> 1:05:46.840
<v Speaker 1>the phone from San Antonio, Texas, Thanks so much for

1:05:46.880 --> 1:05:50.720
<v Speaker 1>listening to Bloomberg Business Week. Download the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud,

1:05:50.800 --> 1:05:52.920
<v Speaker 1>or at Bloomberg dot com, and be sure to check

1:05:52.960 --> 1:05:55.240
<v Speaker 1>out our daily radio show at two pm Eastern on

1:05:55.360 --> 1:05:57.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio. And be sure to watch us too on

1:05:57.880 --> 1:05:59.880
<v Speaker 1>YouTube by searching Bloomberg. Well we'