WEBVTT - Markets, Banks, Bioscience, and Tech (Podcast)

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day, we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:15.520
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.560 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.079
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. I'm seeing red on

0:00:22.120 --> 0:00:23.840
<v Speaker 1>the screen, but I need to see some green at

0:00:23.880 --> 0:00:26.120
<v Speaker 1>some point. But let's talk to a professional who does

0:00:26.120 --> 0:00:30.560
<v Speaker 1>this stuff for a living. Natalie Wolfson, CEO at Asset Mark. Natalie,

0:00:30.600 --> 0:00:32.839
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for taking the time to join us here.

0:00:32.840 --> 0:00:34.559
<v Speaker 1>I love to get your thought here as we kind

0:00:34.560 --> 0:00:40.559
<v Speaker 1>of put a bow on uh two, what do we

0:00:40.600 --> 0:00:44.320
<v Speaker 1>do for? Because I got crushed in my equities, I

0:00:44.360 --> 0:00:47.760
<v Speaker 1>got crushed in my bonds. I have a big barrel

0:00:47.760 --> 0:00:51.120
<v Speaker 1>of oil in my house. I'm okay there, But what

0:00:51.159 --> 0:00:54.000
<v Speaker 1>do you do? You know? It's it's interesting, um as

0:00:54.000 --> 0:00:56.920
<v Speaker 1>a result of sort of of the feds um really

0:00:57.000 --> 0:01:00.160
<v Speaker 1>relentless tightening in the second half of this year, they're

0:01:00.200 --> 0:01:04.319
<v Speaker 1>actually interesting opportunities right now in short term treasuries. If

0:01:04.319 --> 0:01:06.520
<v Speaker 1>you want to build a short term treasury portfolio with

0:01:06.560 --> 0:01:09.120
<v Speaker 1>the duration of you know, roughly half a year you

0:01:09.160 --> 0:01:11.480
<v Speaker 1>can get four point six percent in yield. And so

0:01:11.920 --> 0:01:13.920
<v Speaker 1>right now, I think all of us, whether you're a

0:01:13.920 --> 0:01:17.240
<v Speaker 1>CEO looking to manage your cost structure or an investor

0:01:17.319 --> 0:01:20.560
<v Speaker 1>looking into next year, feeling a little risk averse and

0:01:20.640 --> 0:01:22.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe like we want to wait and see, and so

0:01:22.160 --> 0:01:24.839
<v Speaker 1>that's a good way to do that. But is that

0:01:25.160 --> 0:01:27.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean I heard the same thing from my financial

0:01:27.560 --> 0:01:30.840
<v Speaker 1>advisor recently. Is that the only thing out there? I mean,

0:01:30.880 --> 0:01:33.520
<v Speaker 1>are there do you have some riskier ideas that maybe

0:01:33.600 --> 0:01:36.520
<v Speaker 1>higher return because four point six percent is great, especially

0:01:36.520 --> 0:01:40.320
<v Speaker 1>if it's completely risk free. I love it, and so short, Um,

0:01:40.400 --> 0:01:44.640
<v Speaker 1>but what else you know, it's it's interesting. Um, clearly

0:01:44.680 --> 0:01:47.120
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot, you know, going on right now in

0:01:47.200 --> 0:01:50.040
<v Speaker 1>the alternative side of the arena. So if you look

0:01:50.080 --> 0:01:52.680
<v Speaker 1>at some of the investments that private equity is making

0:01:52.760 --> 0:01:54.600
<v Speaker 1>right now, if you're willing to hold it for the

0:01:54.720 --> 0:01:57.440
<v Speaker 1>long term, um, that's clearly a part of the market

0:01:57.560 --> 0:02:00.680
<v Speaker 1>that has historically done well, and markets this where things

0:02:00.720 --> 0:02:03.800
<v Speaker 1>are a little volatile on the public side. So I

0:02:03.800 --> 0:02:08.000
<v Speaker 1>would absolutely absolutely look there. Um. In addition to that,

0:02:08.120 --> 0:02:09.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you're willing to take a little risk

0:02:10.560 --> 0:02:13.680
<v Speaker 1>in the first year post a bear market. In that

0:02:13.800 --> 0:02:17.200
<v Speaker 1>first year, fifty percent of the total bell bear returns

0:02:17.280 --> 0:02:20.080
<v Speaker 1>it's actually forty eight percent, but roughly fifty percent of

0:02:20.120 --> 0:02:23.119
<v Speaker 1>the total bear returns on average happen in that first year.

0:02:23.639 --> 0:02:26.160
<v Speaker 1>So legging into equities, even if you want to do

0:02:26.200 --> 0:02:28.400
<v Speaker 1>it in a passive way, UM, as long as you're

0:02:28.400 --> 0:02:31.280
<v Speaker 1>willing to stay the course if things get a little

0:02:31.320 --> 0:02:33.919
<v Speaker 1>worse from here, you won't miss that first year, which

0:02:33.960 --> 0:02:36.760
<v Speaker 1>is really important. Natalie are you you're based in California?

0:02:36.960 --> 0:02:38.880
<v Speaker 1>I am What are you doing in New York? Then?

0:02:39.280 --> 0:02:41.680
<v Speaker 1>I am here for a board meeting? Okay, all right,

0:02:41.720 --> 0:02:43.880
<v Speaker 1>I just want to check you know, people coming into tourists.

0:02:43.880 --> 0:02:46.120
<v Speaker 1>You're coming back big time, Matt. I was kind of

0:02:46.160 --> 0:02:49.359
<v Speaker 1>out and about Midtown yesterday and they are out. I mean,

0:02:49.480 --> 0:02:51.919
<v Speaker 1>every language on the planet's being spoken. Here is the

0:02:51.960 --> 0:02:53.760
<v Speaker 1>last place I want to be right now? Why not?

0:02:54.160 --> 0:02:59.600
<v Speaker 1>The weather is off? Please, it's it's the greatest. Talk

0:02:59.680 --> 0:03:01.480
<v Speaker 1>to us about asset mark. I mean, you work with

0:03:01.520 --> 0:03:05.919
<v Speaker 1>independent advisors. What do they sing? Are they seeing money

0:03:06.000 --> 0:03:09.120
<v Speaker 1>come their way? What do you guys, asset mark? Where

0:03:09.160 --> 0:03:10.680
<v Speaker 1>where do you add value? How do you try to

0:03:10.720 --> 0:03:14.440
<v Speaker 1>help your clients as Mark helps our clients by helping

0:03:14.480 --> 0:03:18.080
<v Speaker 1>them compete at any size, and so we provide outsourced

0:03:18.120 --> 0:03:23.239
<v Speaker 1>and investment services, technology and support, the support and entrepreneur

0:03:23.320 --> 0:03:26.519
<v Speaker 1>needs to run a thriving business for our advisors. And

0:03:26.560 --> 0:03:29.800
<v Speaker 1>as a result, advisors who use us have on average

0:03:29.800 --> 0:03:33.640
<v Speaker 1>about fourteen points more operating leverage than their competition if

0:03:33.680 --> 0:03:36.600
<v Speaker 1>you look at publicly available data UM, which is great

0:03:36.720 --> 0:03:39.640
<v Speaker 1>because advisors can use that fourteen points to invest in

0:03:39.680 --> 0:03:42.160
<v Speaker 1>areas that are really important to their clients, which helps

0:03:42.160 --> 0:03:45.840
<v Speaker 1>them grow. So are advisor groups Are they leaving the

0:03:45.880 --> 0:03:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Merrill Lynch platforms, the Smith Barney platforms and all that

0:03:48.680 --> 0:03:50.440
<v Speaker 1>and kind of going out on their own. Is that

0:03:50.600 --> 0:03:53.760
<v Speaker 1>still a trend? Yes, the move to independence is still

0:03:53.760 --> 0:03:58.240
<v Speaker 1>a trend. In addition, advisors often they start, they get

0:03:58.280 --> 0:04:01.040
<v Speaker 1>their uh c f A or c a P certification

0:04:01.080 --> 0:04:02.680
<v Speaker 1>and they start and they want to be an entrepreneur

0:04:02.880 --> 0:04:06.080
<v Speaker 1>and serve clients and their local community. I have one

0:04:06.120 --> 0:04:10.600
<v Speaker 1>advisor who decided that she wanted to move away um

0:04:10.640 --> 0:04:13.200
<v Speaker 1>from UH that he I'm sorry, I wanted to move

0:04:13.200 --> 0:04:16.400
<v Speaker 1>away from the auto manufacturing industry and become an advisor.

0:04:16.480 --> 0:04:18.919
<v Speaker 1>And now he serves clients in that industry because no

0:04:18.960 --> 0:04:22.120
<v Speaker 1>one understands it better than him. Interesting, what what do

0:04:22.160 --> 0:04:25.320
<v Speaker 1>you think about value stocks right now? I see first

0:04:25.320 --> 0:04:28.760
<v Speaker 1>eagle on your resume? Yes, yes, uh, first eagle. I

0:04:29.000 --> 0:04:32.080
<v Speaker 1>clearly value is near and dear to my heart, and um,

0:04:32.360 --> 0:04:34.000
<v Speaker 1>you know I always love value stocks that you know,

0:04:34.040 --> 0:04:36.760
<v Speaker 1>it's important to understand the companies you're investing in, and

0:04:36.880 --> 0:04:38.880
<v Speaker 1>at the heart of the matter, that's value. So I

0:04:38.920 --> 0:04:40.719
<v Speaker 1>like that. Right now, how do you define value? Do

0:04:40.720 --> 0:04:43.680
<v Speaker 1>you go to the typical price, earnings price the book?

0:04:44.000 --> 0:04:45.640
<v Speaker 1>How do you think of value? Because I guess values

0:04:45.640 --> 0:04:48.000
<v Speaker 1>a relative term for a lot of people. Yeah, so

0:04:48.120 --> 0:04:50.440
<v Speaker 1>for me, it's definitely more price to book and then

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:53.799
<v Speaker 1>looking at sales, making sure you really understand what's driving

0:04:53.800 --> 0:04:59.000
<v Speaker 1>sales and what's driving revenue growth. Are there tools newer tools?

0:04:59.040 --> 0:05:01.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking about et F, But maybe there's something else

0:05:01.320 --> 0:05:04.080
<v Speaker 1>that you think are trending up for for the right

0:05:04.120 --> 0:05:07.120
<v Speaker 1>reasons right now? Um. So, one thing that I think

0:05:07.200 --> 0:05:11.080
<v Speaker 1>is really important is personalization is finally coming to investing,

0:05:11.560 --> 0:05:14.880
<v Speaker 1>and so I'm a really big believer in direct indexing

0:05:14.920 --> 0:05:17.280
<v Speaker 1>as being a trend that's going to stay with us.

0:05:17.600 --> 0:05:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Um And the reason for that is I think in

0:05:19.320 --> 0:05:22.400
<v Speaker 1>in every part of investors lives. They're able to personalize

0:05:22.400 --> 0:05:24.880
<v Speaker 1>what they do. Why not with their investments. You know,

0:05:24.880 --> 0:05:27.400
<v Speaker 1>if you're if you're feeling that you don't want to

0:05:27.400 --> 0:05:29.680
<v Speaker 1>invest in a particular part of the market because of

0:05:30.279 --> 0:05:32.719
<v Speaker 1>a value you have, or you really want to double

0:05:32.760 --> 0:05:34.280
<v Speaker 1>down on that part of market, you should be able

0:05:34.320 --> 0:05:37.480
<v Speaker 1>to do it and still have a portfolio that has

0:05:37.760 --> 0:05:42.839
<v Speaker 1>um return characteristics that you're comfortable with. Direct indexing, you

0:05:42.839 --> 0:05:46.000
<v Speaker 1>can basically build your own index, right. You can take

0:05:46.040 --> 0:05:50.400
<v Speaker 1>someone else's index and say, um, you don't want Google

0:05:50.600 --> 0:05:53.560
<v Speaker 1>or Facebook in your SMP. You can just pull them

0:05:53.560 --> 0:05:57.360
<v Speaker 1>out and have the rest of the SMP um. I mean,

0:05:57.400 --> 0:05:59.839
<v Speaker 1>you can do anything you want, right, that's right, and

0:06:00.120 --> 0:06:01.479
<v Speaker 1>you can pull them out and then you can put

0:06:01.480 --> 0:06:05.000
<v Speaker 1>something in that has a similar return characteristic, or you

0:06:05.040 --> 0:06:08.279
<v Speaker 1>can double weight something that has a similar return characteristics,

0:06:08.320 --> 0:06:11.600
<v Speaker 1>so you still have um you know, on paper roughly

0:06:11.680 --> 0:06:13.919
<v Speaker 1>the performance of the SMP. Not as a retail investor,

0:06:13.920 --> 0:06:17.039
<v Speaker 1>but this is something that the advisors with whom you

0:06:17.120 --> 0:06:20.000
<v Speaker 1>work can do and that offer their clients both actually

0:06:20.000 --> 0:06:23.200
<v Speaker 1>advisors with whom my work can help retail investors build

0:06:23.200 --> 0:06:26.560
<v Speaker 1>the index that's perfect for them and it's extremely important

0:06:26.680 --> 0:06:29.240
<v Speaker 1>for an investor to understand, you know, tracking error and

0:06:29.320 --> 0:06:32.719
<v Speaker 1>concepts that might not be immediately evident um. But also

0:06:32.800 --> 0:06:36.080
<v Speaker 1>investors can do it directly using several retail platforms. All right,

0:06:36.120 --> 0:06:38.800
<v Speaker 1>good stuff cool. Natalie Wolfson, CEO of Asset Mark, joining

0:06:38.839 --> 0:06:40.880
<v Speaker 1>us live here in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker studio in

0:06:40.920 --> 0:06:48.560
<v Speaker 1>from California. Marijuana stocks are tumbling today after Senate Minority

0:06:48.640 --> 0:06:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Leader Mitch McConnell criticized attempts to add a marijuana banking

0:06:52.440 --> 0:06:56.000
<v Speaker 1>bill the National Defense Authorization Acts. So we said, let's

0:06:56.000 --> 0:06:59.640
<v Speaker 1>talk about the cannabis biz. Does Mitch McConnell have against weed?

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:02.040
<v Speaker 1>He just doesn't look like a weed friendly dude when

0:07:02.040 --> 0:07:05.200
<v Speaker 1>you look at him, you know, So it doesn't true.

0:07:05.400 --> 0:07:07.240
<v Speaker 1>They grow some of the best weed in the whole country.

0:07:07.240 --> 0:07:10.880
<v Speaker 1>There absolutely some good bourbon too. Josh Joseph joins us.

0:07:10.920 --> 0:07:14.320
<v Speaker 1>He's the CEO and founder of Big Plan Holdings. Josh,

0:07:14.400 --> 0:07:15.920
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us here. I love for

0:07:15.920 --> 0:07:17.120
<v Speaker 1>you to give us just kind of the lay of

0:07:17.160 --> 0:07:20.360
<v Speaker 1>the land. What do you guys do at Big Plan Holdings.

0:07:23.720 --> 0:07:25.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't believe Josh is there. I don't believe Josh

0:07:25.800 --> 0:07:28.520
<v Speaker 1>is there. Somebody's gotta push like the button that brings

0:07:28.600 --> 0:07:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Josh back. But so to I'm lo gonna till ray

0:07:31.280 --> 0:07:32.920
<v Speaker 1>the stock is off today. That's like one of the

0:07:32.920 --> 0:07:37.240
<v Speaker 1>big weed companies. UM, Josh Joseph CEO and founder Big

0:07:37.240 --> 0:07:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Plan Holdings. You there, my friend, can you hear me? Okay,

0:07:40.920 --> 0:07:43.960
<v Speaker 1>yes we can absolutely. We're just talking cannabis here. We we

0:07:43.840 --> 0:07:45.680
<v Speaker 1>we love to get a sense of what you guys

0:07:46.160 --> 0:07:52.840
<v Speaker 1>at Big Plan Holdings are up to these days. All

0:07:52.920 --> 0:07:57.440
<v Speaker 1>right today guys much appreciated, and you have to jump

0:07:57.440 --> 0:08:00.800
<v Speaker 1>into a Big Plan Holdings and you know what we're

0:08:01.040 --> 0:08:06.000
<v Speaker 1>what we're all about is UH a family office diversified

0:08:06.320 --> 0:08:09.960
<v Speaker 1>in many different investment verticals. UH, you know, with one

0:08:10.000 --> 0:08:13.440
<v Speaker 1>of our primary focals, UH focal points certainly based in

0:08:13.480 --> 0:08:17.400
<v Speaker 1>the cannabis and UH and CBD industries. UM, coming out

0:08:17.440 --> 0:08:20.200
<v Speaker 1>of a great deal of experience in cannabis. It's two

0:08:20.200 --> 0:08:23.760
<v Speaker 1>thousand fourteen. So you've been what you did? You start

0:08:23.800 --> 0:08:27.520
<v Speaker 1>off in real estate and then get into we'd real

0:08:27.640 --> 0:08:31.200
<v Speaker 1>estate and then go to Big Plan Holdings. Yeah. Yeah,

0:08:31.240 --> 0:08:33.800
<v Speaker 1>my my quick professional track and I'll give you you

0:08:33.840 --> 0:08:37.800
<v Speaker 1>guys an abbreviated version of that is have specialized in

0:08:37.840 --> 0:08:41.120
<v Speaker 1>commercial real estate around the country probably for about twenty

0:08:41.120 --> 0:08:44.480
<v Speaker 1>six or twenty seven years, all facets of real estate

0:08:44.640 --> 0:08:48.640
<v Speaker 1>from uh, you know, development to straight up ownership of

0:08:48.679 --> 0:08:52.079
<v Speaker 1>existing assets to a lot of bankruptcy and distressed real

0:08:52.160 --> 0:08:55.560
<v Speaker 1>estate sales and transacted and you know, probably forty or

0:08:55.559 --> 0:08:59.400
<v Speaker 1>forty five states around the country. So I've had a

0:08:59.520 --> 0:09:02.760
<v Speaker 1>very very fortunate run in the commercial real estate sector.

0:09:03.280 --> 0:09:06.520
<v Speaker 1>That that then evolved into jumping into the state of

0:09:06.559 --> 0:09:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Illinois UH their cannabis program in two thousand fourteen as

0:09:11.080 --> 0:09:15.560
<v Speaker 1>an applicant UH and successfully securing seven of the initial

0:09:16.080 --> 0:09:21.480
<v Speaker 1>fifty medical retail dispensary licenses. UM, which also cannabis, also

0:09:21.559 --> 0:09:25.000
<v Speaker 1>has a very very big overlap within real estate as well.

0:09:25.120 --> 0:09:27.839
<v Speaker 1>You can't have a dispensary or a growth facility or

0:09:27.880 --> 0:09:31.360
<v Speaker 1>extraction or manufacturing facility or anything without real estate. So

0:09:31.640 --> 0:09:33.440
<v Speaker 1>they really did go hand in hand. But what's the

0:09:33.480 --> 0:09:37.679
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure look like, Josh um in terms of the grow

0:09:37.720 --> 0:09:41.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Humble County is so famous in California. I know,

0:09:41.800 --> 0:09:45.280
<v Speaker 1>UM Athens, Ohio, and we were just talking about Kentucky. UM,

0:09:45.320 --> 0:09:48.040
<v Speaker 1>you know used to grow some pretty good weed when

0:09:48.040 --> 0:09:49.480
<v Speaker 1>I was in high school. So what what's it look

0:09:49.559 --> 0:09:53.240
<v Speaker 1>like now where where where is? Uh? Where the best operations?

0:09:53.960 --> 0:09:56.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, you know this, this has become a real

0:09:56.520 --> 0:09:58.400
<v Speaker 1>big business. You know when when when I got involved

0:09:58.400 --> 0:10:02.120
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand THO team, it was it was still

0:10:02.320 --> 0:10:05.920
<v Speaker 1>really an incubator in a very very immature industry. You

0:10:05.960 --> 0:10:09.760
<v Speaker 1>fast forward to two thousand twenty two. Uh, this industry,

0:10:09.760 --> 0:10:14.160
<v Speaker 1>the cannabis industry as a whole, is um dramatically different,

0:10:14.280 --> 0:10:17.560
<v Speaker 1>dramatically more mature. Still has a significant amount of runway

0:10:18.040 --> 0:10:21.440
<v Speaker 1>to it, I think in many many respects. But you

0:10:21.480 --> 0:10:24.040
<v Speaker 1>know what you're seeing now is you're seeing the technology.

0:10:24.240 --> 0:10:27.319
<v Speaker 1>You're seeing real R and D. You're seeing real science

0:10:27.360 --> 0:10:31.720
<v Speaker 1>take place with the larger with the larger cannabis operators around. Um.

0:10:31.760 --> 0:10:34.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, whether they be the public companies, whether they

0:10:34.520 --> 0:10:37.480
<v Speaker 1>be the private companies that remain um yet to go

0:10:37.559 --> 0:10:41.839
<v Speaker 1>public or yet to sell to larger, larger operators. Uh.

0:10:41.880 --> 0:10:45.920
<v Speaker 1>You know again, guys, remember you know, the whole cannabis industry.

0:10:46.000 --> 0:10:48.120
<v Speaker 1>We can talk about this for hours, but you know

0:10:48.200 --> 0:10:50.679
<v Speaker 1>it violates federal law still yet today. So it's a

0:10:50.720 --> 0:10:53.960
<v Speaker 1>federal ob versus state law issue. And then when when

0:10:54.000 --> 0:10:58.800
<v Speaker 1>states enact legislation, they will typically get what they will

0:10:58.840 --> 0:11:03.040
<v Speaker 1>always out of the gate, always, always, always go medical

0:11:03.480 --> 0:11:05.679
<v Speaker 1>with a medical program first, you know, That's how they

0:11:05.679 --> 0:11:09.080
<v Speaker 1>dip their toe in the water. Uh. With a medical program,

0:11:09.160 --> 0:11:11.640
<v Speaker 1>they usually typically give it twelve or twenty four months.

0:11:12.000 --> 0:11:14.560
<v Speaker 1>They then go to adult use, which is also known

0:11:14.559 --> 0:11:17.959
<v Speaker 1>as recreational use, and then that process kind of evolves,

0:11:18.000 --> 0:11:20.200
<v Speaker 1>if you will. Um. Well, I was just trying to

0:11:20.240 --> 0:11:22.520
<v Speaker 1>pin down because this is the reason I wanted to

0:11:22.559 --> 0:11:25.320
<v Speaker 1>talk about it today. We thought that the Safe Act,

0:11:25.559 --> 0:11:28.520
<v Speaker 1>the you know, Marijuana Banking Act, was going to get

0:11:28.520 --> 0:11:30.559
<v Speaker 1>put into a defense bill and make it a lot

0:11:30.600 --> 0:11:33.840
<v Speaker 1>easier for you guys to do business. Um, it got

0:11:33.840 --> 0:11:36.840
<v Speaker 1>taken out. So I'm wondering, when you look at just this,

0:11:37.440 --> 0:11:42.440
<v Speaker 1>um the skeleton of the marijuana business around North America,

0:11:42.880 --> 0:11:46.640
<v Speaker 1>is it still you know, scary looking Greg Almond dudes

0:11:46.720 --> 0:11:49.440
<v Speaker 1>with shotguns and pickup trucks that are growing up? Or

0:11:49.559 --> 0:11:53.400
<v Speaker 1>is it nothing nothing near that, nothing near that whatsoever.

0:11:53.920 --> 0:11:57.160
<v Speaker 1>This is a real industry that's not going anywhere. This

0:11:57.200 --> 0:12:01.360
<v Speaker 1>is a heavily politicized and polarized, um, you know situation

0:12:01.360 --> 0:12:03.720
<v Speaker 1>as it relates to the Safe Banking Act and and

0:12:03.720 --> 0:12:06.800
<v Speaker 1>and the number of other nuances and really key elements

0:12:06.800 --> 0:12:09.840
<v Speaker 1>to the industry being able to continue to grow successfully

0:12:10.520 --> 0:12:13.240
<v Speaker 1>in this country. No, this is that this is not

0:12:13.360 --> 0:12:16.920
<v Speaker 1>the old school head shop approach, if you will with

0:12:17.280 --> 0:12:20.720
<v Speaker 1>h you know the cartel and uh you know the

0:12:20.720 --> 0:12:23.240
<v Speaker 1>the gangs, and you know there certainly is still a

0:12:23.280 --> 0:12:26.200
<v Speaker 1>black market out there without question. But no, this is

0:12:26.200 --> 0:12:30.760
<v Speaker 1>a real deal, professional industry that has UH, that has

0:12:30.800 --> 0:12:34.040
<v Speaker 1>stabilized itself in many many ways, and we need safe

0:12:34.040 --> 0:12:37.880
<v Speaker 1>banking to pass. So it must so. And there's still

0:12:37.920 --> 0:12:40.680
<v Speaker 1>I think some optimism and analystic Cowan said, he thinks

0:12:40.679 --> 0:12:42.320
<v Speaker 1>it's going to get done by the end of the year.

0:12:42.640 --> 0:12:46.160
<v Speaker 1>When that happens and you're running uh, you know UH

0:12:46.880 --> 0:12:49.320
<v Speaker 1>UM invest an investment office here, What do you like

0:12:49.480 --> 0:12:52.679
<v Speaker 1>if I look in UM for example the e t F,

0:12:52.840 --> 0:12:56.679
<v Speaker 1>I see til Ray as a huge UH player, innovative

0:12:56.720 --> 0:13:00.000
<v Speaker 1>industrial canopy growth. What what do you like out there?

0:13:00.960 --> 0:13:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Company wise? Is that what you're talking about? Yeah? So

0:13:04.800 --> 0:13:06.640
<v Speaker 1>so I'm a I'm a big I'm a big fan.

0:13:06.840 --> 0:13:10.840
<v Speaker 1>I founded a company called Grassroots Canabas based out of Chicago.

0:13:11.600 --> 0:13:13.880
<v Speaker 1>Today we are either the number one or number two

0:13:13.960 --> 0:13:17.559
<v Speaker 1>largest exit it has taken place in the cannabis industry.

0:13:17.600 --> 0:13:21.640
<v Speaker 1>We sold our company July twenty to cure a Leaf.

0:13:21.720 --> 0:13:23.840
<v Speaker 1>At the time of that sale, we're the largest privately

0:13:23.880 --> 0:13:26.800
<v Speaker 1>held cannabis company in the US and including all the

0:13:26.840 --> 0:13:29.160
<v Speaker 1>pub codes you can only be public up in Canada.

0:13:29.320 --> 0:13:32.439
<v Speaker 1>Right now we're probably the third or fourth largest cannabis

0:13:32.480 --> 0:13:35.360
<v Speaker 1>company in the country. Pure A Leaf, who is the

0:13:35.400 --> 0:13:37.679
<v Speaker 1>largest cannabis company in the world. They happen to be

0:13:37.679 --> 0:13:41.320
<v Speaker 1>baked based in Wakefield, Massachusetts, but they have a very

0:13:41.400 --> 0:13:44.760
<v Speaker 1>large European footprints as well. Um you know, came in

0:13:44.800 --> 0:13:47.960
<v Speaker 1>and they acquired us. And so here's what I here's

0:13:47.960 --> 0:13:50.880
<v Speaker 1>what I see. I see the stronger going to survive

0:13:50.920 --> 0:13:53.120
<v Speaker 1>in this in this industry, Like a lot of industry,

0:13:53.200 --> 0:13:55.200
<v Speaker 1>I think at the end, at the end of all

0:13:55.280 --> 0:13:58.600
<v Speaker 1>of this, when we fast forward five years, ten years,

0:13:58.679 --> 0:14:01.400
<v Speaker 1>fifteen years, I think what we're gonna see is we're

0:14:01.400 --> 0:14:04.440
<v Speaker 1>going to see companies like Kira Leaf, g t I,

0:14:04.600 --> 0:14:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Green Thumb Industry is you know, known as g T I, Cressco.

0:14:08.920 --> 0:14:12.120
<v Speaker 1>I think we'll see True Leave. I think we'll see Murano.

0:14:12.640 --> 0:14:15.600
<v Speaker 1>I think we'll see um, you know, I think we'll

0:14:15.600 --> 0:14:18.679
<v Speaker 1>see you know, maybe another couple out there. We'll see somewhere.

0:14:18.760 --> 0:14:22.080
<v Speaker 1>We'll see somewhere guys between five and ten of the

0:14:22.200 --> 0:14:24.880
<v Speaker 1>big of the big boys and girls, if you will,

0:14:25.280 --> 0:14:27.720
<v Speaker 1>that will be the industry leaders. I think there's gonna

0:14:27.720 --> 0:14:31.000
<v Speaker 1>be a significant drop off, and we call those tier

0:14:31.040 --> 0:14:34.200
<v Speaker 1>one m s os in in in our world in cannabis.

0:14:34.520 --> 0:14:36.280
<v Speaker 1>I think when you drop down to the tier two

0:14:36.320 --> 0:14:38.680
<v Speaker 1>and the tier three m s o s, a lot

0:14:38.760 --> 0:14:40.800
<v Speaker 1>of those folks are gonna be gobbled up over time.

0:14:41.240 --> 0:14:45.640
<v Speaker 1>I think some will continue to survive and they'll be successful. Um,

0:14:45.680 --> 0:14:47.640
<v Speaker 1>but I think a lot of those will you know,

0:14:47.640 --> 0:14:52.120
<v Speaker 1>will be gobbled up over time. As regulatory hurdles are

0:14:52.360 --> 0:14:55.360
<v Speaker 1>are you know, continue to kind of you know, unwrap

0:14:55.440 --> 0:14:57.480
<v Speaker 1>if you will. You know, right now we are all

0:14:57.520 --> 0:15:00.560
<v Speaker 1>as large M s o s um we are. We

0:15:00.600 --> 0:15:03.680
<v Speaker 1>are stuck with certain regulation caps, if you will, on

0:15:03.760 --> 0:15:06.280
<v Speaker 1>the numbers of licenses that we can have in the state.

0:15:06.840 --> 0:15:10.000
<v Speaker 1>So um, you know, once those once those things changed,

0:15:10.040 --> 0:15:12.720
<v Speaker 1>for example, and you can have more than for as

0:15:12.760 --> 0:15:16.400
<v Speaker 1>in Illinois, you cannot have more than ten dispensaries in

0:15:16.440 --> 0:15:19.320
<v Speaker 1>the state of Illinois. Once that's lifted or that's modified,

0:15:19.360 --> 0:15:22.040
<v Speaker 1>if you will, and you can flex up to fifteen

0:15:22.120 --> 0:15:25.160
<v Speaker 1>or twenty or thirty or unlimited, You're going to see

0:15:25.200 --> 0:15:29.320
<v Speaker 1>a major, major push towards your consolidation of the large

0:15:29.400 --> 0:15:31.720
<v Speaker 1>of the large companies, the large MSOs coming in and

0:15:31.760 --> 0:15:35.600
<v Speaker 1>buying the smaller companies in my opinion, Thanks very much,

0:15:36.000 --> 0:15:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Josh Joseph there. Well, the investment banks were in the

0:15:42.000 --> 0:15:45.880
<v Speaker 1>news this week. Gold Sas had their annual conference, financial

0:15:45.880 --> 0:15:50.440
<v Speaker 1>services conference, all the big I know, it almost like

0:15:50.440 --> 0:15:53.920
<v Speaker 1>a set up. Yeah, like they're talking recessions, they're talking

0:15:54.120 --> 0:15:57.800
<v Speaker 1>laying off people, cutting bonus pools. It was a real downer.

0:15:58.400 --> 0:16:00.680
<v Speaker 1>Shelly Bassett was there, I put something to blame on?

0:16:00.920 --> 0:16:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Was there? She like lad the whole conference. I know,

0:16:04.480 --> 0:16:07.320
<v Speaker 1>she had some awesome interviews. So we've got the bass

0:16:07.520 --> 0:16:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News Wall Street reporter here in our studio, as

0:16:10.240 --> 0:16:14.520
<v Speaker 1>well as Alison Williams, senior banks analyst at Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:16:14.520 --> 0:16:16.760
<v Speaker 1>So Chanali, let's start with you. You were at the

0:16:16.760 --> 0:16:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Goldman conference. Boy, the Bloomberg News stories your interviews coming

0:16:22.200 --> 0:16:25.040
<v Speaker 1>across the Bloomberg television sounded kind of like a bummer.

0:16:25.560 --> 0:16:27.920
<v Speaker 1>What was it? You know, it's interesting this is the

0:16:27.920 --> 0:16:30.000
<v Speaker 1>thirty third year of the conference. It's not over. It's

0:16:30.000 --> 0:16:32.840
<v Speaker 1>still on today. And I was told at the conference

0:16:32.880 --> 0:16:36.480
<v Speaker 1>that every year is either like a super happy year,

0:16:36.800 --> 0:16:41.760
<v Speaker 1>super gloomy gloomy one, and this year was definitely gloomy. Um,

0:16:41.800 --> 0:16:44.440
<v Speaker 1>but is that so surprising most of the folks, they

0:16:44.480 --> 0:16:47.200
<v Speaker 1>are expecting a recession. In every conversation was how to

0:16:47.240 --> 0:16:50.880
<v Speaker 1>prepare for that? And it seemed like every conversation was

0:16:51.760 --> 0:16:56.240
<v Speaker 1>bank ceo telling his star performers to get ready for

0:16:56.560 --> 0:17:01.160
<v Speaker 1>crappy bonus on background, guys, something so interesting. I was wait, wait,

0:17:01.200 --> 0:17:05.479
<v Speaker 1>this is live well on background to employee other banks

0:17:05.520 --> 0:17:12.720
<v Speaker 1>from me the record, Yes, live radio now on background.

0:17:12.720 --> 0:17:15.359
<v Speaker 1>A lot of other folks arrivals of Goldman Sachs would

0:17:15.400 --> 0:17:18.880
<v Speaker 1>tell me they were hoping that Solomon would be very negative.

0:17:19.040 --> 0:17:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Why because if he set the bar low, it made

0:17:21.840 --> 0:17:25.399
<v Speaker 1>it easier for everybody else to also do that. Yeah,

0:17:25.600 --> 0:17:29.200
<v Speaker 1>so Alice, Because when Paul goes to his manager, um,

0:17:29.240 --> 0:17:31.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, and says I want to raise The manager says,

0:17:31.160 --> 0:17:32.840
<v Speaker 1>it's been a crappy year. I'm sorry, we're giving you

0:17:32.840 --> 0:17:36.240
<v Speaker 1>a cut, and he says, I'm going across the street.

0:17:36.320 --> 0:17:39.000
<v Speaker 1>The manager says, hey, dude, did you hear Shinali Bastic's

0:17:39.000 --> 0:17:42.119
<v Speaker 1>interview with David Solomon. Don't go over there. Did you

0:17:42.160 --> 0:17:44.480
<v Speaker 1>see Rich Handler's note don't go over there, So I

0:17:44.600 --> 0:17:47.840
<v Speaker 1>sulk back to my desk and table between man legs. Alison,

0:17:48.119 --> 0:17:51.119
<v Speaker 1>you've got your three outlooks out like most of the

0:17:51.119 --> 0:17:54.480
<v Speaker 1>other Bloomberg Intelligence analysts. What's your out look for some

0:17:54.560 --> 0:17:56.280
<v Speaker 1>of these big banks next year? I mean, we got

0:17:56.400 --> 0:17:59.119
<v Speaker 1>rates rising, that's a good thing from an interest market.

0:17:59.119 --> 0:18:01.200
<v Speaker 1>The markets can't be any worse. Something work this year,

0:18:01.440 --> 0:18:04.960
<v Speaker 1>I think. I mean it's all about we have a recession.

0:18:05.240 --> 0:18:08.200
<v Speaker 1>How deep is the recession? When the recession right, I

0:18:08.240 --> 0:18:12.600
<v Speaker 1>would say that, um, you know the banks are prepared, right,

0:18:12.640 --> 0:18:14.399
<v Speaker 1>So I think that's the point that they were making,

0:18:14.560 --> 0:18:16.480
<v Speaker 1>is like, oh, there's a lot of negative there's risks

0:18:16.480 --> 0:18:19.000
<v Speaker 1>out there. But I have a question for Alison. Sure

0:18:20.040 --> 0:18:23.920
<v Speaker 1>trading is up, trading is up, but not as much

0:18:23.960 --> 0:18:29.399
<v Speaker 1>as fees are down. Yeah, and that's does volatility still

0:18:29.640 --> 0:18:31.560
<v Speaker 1>keep that trading a head when next year? I think

0:18:31.560 --> 0:18:35.439
<v Speaker 1>it does? I mean keep in mind, right, so macro

0:18:35.600 --> 0:18:40.680
<v Speaker 1>trading is at record levels, right, Equity trading is down

0:18:40.720 --> 0:18:46.640
<v Speaker 1>five from record levels. Investment banking, yes, down from record levels.

0:18:46.640 --> 0:18:49.439
<v Speaker 1>So going but going into next year, right, if something's

0:18:49.480 --> 0:18:51.399
<v Speaker 1>down for a few percent, it's half is important to

0:18:51.440 --> 0:18:55.440
<v Speaker 1>your bottom line next year? And there will be some recovery.

0:18:55.560 --> 0:18:57.680
<v Speaker 1>I think it's going to be all about for the fees.

0:18:57.720 --> 0:19:00.119
<v Speaker 1>It's all gonna be about one queue. What can they

0:19:00.119 --> 0:19:03.120
<v Speaker 1>push out in the seasonally strong recorder. I think there

0:19:03.280 --> 0:19:06.200
<v Speaker 1>is some you know, there's this term labor hoarding. I

0:19:06.240 --> 0:19:09.240
<v Speaker 1>think they're bank reboarding. Right. So we've heard about cuts,

0:19:09.280 --> 0:19:12.800
<v Speaker 1>but they're like very small cuts, and again after a

0:19:12.920 --> 0:19:18.480
<v Speaker 1>scramble to add talent, they're hesitant to let them go.

0:19:18.640 --> 0:19:21.160
<v Speaker 1>And you have people like Daniel Pinto, who's the head

0:19:21.200 --> 0:19:24.680
<v Speaker 1>of JP Morgan c ib saying, you know, we're gonna

0:19:24.680 --> 0:19:27.320
<v Speaker 1>cut comp but we're gonna keep heads, you know, after

0:19:27.440 --> 0:19:29.160
<v Speaker 1>all the work we did to get the people in place.

0:19:29.280 --> 0:19:31.600
<v Speaker 1>My suspicion here is that a few star traders who

0:19:31.560 --> 0:19:34.199
<v Speaker 1>are going to get higher bonuses still I mean, at

0:19:34.240 --> 0:19:35.960
<v Speaker 1>the end of the day they have to write or

0:19:36.000 --> 0:19:38.760
<v Speaker 1>they where they go to hedge funds. There's a hedge

0:19:38.760 --> 0:19:40.800
<v Speaker 1>funds still high. They go to hedge funds, and I

0:19:40.840 --> 0:19:42.760
<v Speaker 1>mean hedge funds it's not a great year either. They

0:19:42.800 --> 0:19:45.199
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of outflows, but macro hedge funds have

0:19:45.280 --> 0:19:49.000
<v Speaker 1>had a pretty good year. Commodities hedge funds there's I mean,

0:19:49.040 --> 0:19:54.680
<v Speaker 1>there's always opportunities sponsor back and places like hedge funds

0:19:54.800 --> 0:19:58.080
<v Speaker 1>and you know these you know boutiques. It's much more

0:19:58.080 --> 0:20:00.159
<v Speaker 1>to eat what you kill. And so if you r

0:20:00.200 --> 0:20:02.720
<v Speaker 1>a star trader, there's a big opportunity for you. What

0:20:02.800 --> 0:20:06.879
<v Speaker 1>are the returns Allison in your investment banking world these days?

0:20:06.960 --> 0:20:08.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean when you and I were there, we were

0:20:08.840 --> 0:20:12.840
<v Speaker 1>generating high teens, low twenties. Are those days because those

0:20:12.880 --> 0:20:16.399
<v Speaker 1>are the days of leverage? But I would say that

0:20:16.760 --> 0:20:18.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you so if we look at like

0:20:18.600 --> 0:20:22.199
<v Speaker 1>sort of the the the are we on the global

0:20:22.240 --> 0:20:24.960
<v Speaker 1>investment banking units of say like the top ten to

0:20:25.040 --> 0:20:28.359
<v Speaker 1>thirteen banks, you know, we hit like fifteen per cent

0:20:28.480 --> 0:20:31.600
<v Speaker 1>last year excluding our goes that you know, that would

0:20:31.600 --> 0:20:33.640
<v Speaker 1>be like a hundred and ten basis point hit. But

0:20:33.920 --> 0:20:36.879
<v Speaker 1>you know that was the best we've seen since before

0:20:36.920 --> 0:20:39.600
<v Speaker 1>the crisis. So that was pretty good. You know, this

0:20:39.680 --> 0:20:41.919
<v Speaker 1>year obviously that's that's going to come down, but we

0:20:42.000 --> 0:20:46.520
<v Speaker 1>think still double digit and that's really what you know

0:20:46.600 --> 0:20:49.840
<v Speaker 1>from the bank investors standpoint for next year. The bottom

0:20:49.840 --> 0:20:52.560
<v Speaker 1>line is the profitability is still good because we had

0:20:52.600 --> 0:20:55.880
<v Speaker 1>this we had this huge revenue. We didn't hire that

0:20:55.920 --> 0:20:59.560
<v Speaker 1>we you know, we hired, but not nearly as much

0:20:59.600 --> 0:21:02.280
<v Speaker 1>as uh, you know, as much as the revity grew

0:21:02.359 --> 0:21:04.119
<v Speaker 1>up to the profitability is something we haven't seen in

0:21:04.119 --> 0:21:07.600
<v Speaker 1>a long time. Like if they have to adjust some

0:21:07.680 --> 0:21:11.560
<v Speaker 1>of their longer term targets, JP Morgan said, sev right,

0:21:11.680 --> 0:21:13.639
<v Speaker 1>if they don't hit that next year, I think you know,

0:21:13.840 --> 0:21:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Crimie River, it's it's a recession, right, that's fine. But

0:21:16.800 --> 0:21:18.639
<v Speaker 1>if they start to have to say, Okay, this is

0:21:18.640 --> 0:21:22.280
<v Speaker 1>not something that we can hit at a more meaningful rate,

0:21:22.480 --> 0:21:26.199
<v Speaker 1>then that's when you have questions about what businesses in

0:21:26.200 --> 0:21:28.400
<v Speaker 1>the longer term are going to make the most sense

0:21:28.400 --> 0:21:31.800
<v Speaker 1>into this new economy, right right, And I think you

0:21:31.800 --> 0:21:34.399
<v Speaker 1>know with JP Morgan, the most interesting things is going

0:21:34.440 --> 0:21:36.120
<v Speaker 1>to be what happens on the cost side. That's where

0:21:36.119 --> 0:21:40.480
<v Speaker 1>we got the big surprise this past January, huge upticking costs.

0:21:41.000 --> 0:21:44.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, people are you know, they sort of signaled like, look,

0:21:44.600 --> 0:21:46.439
<v Speaker 1>this isn't going away anytime soon. But that was in

0:21:46.480 --> 0:21:49.960
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of the year. So could those costs, could

0:21:49.960 --> 0:21:52.840
<v Speaker 1>that guidance be a lever for next year in terms

0:21:52.960 --> 0:21:56.080
<v Speaker 1>of actually with tech tech talent is getting cheaper too.

0:21:56.359 --> 0:21:59.359
<v Speaker 1>That's the reality. Also, that's a huge, huge, huge thing

0:21:59.400 --> 0:22:02.480
<v Speaker 1>that all Street. You know, I had a big competitive

0:22:02.560 --> 0:22:04.960
<v Speaker 1>challenge from absolutely young kids coming out of school, even

0:22:05.000 --> 0:22:09.280
<v Speaker 1>everybody Jane Street for f t X. That's turned around.

0:22:09.560 --> 0:22:13.320
<v Speaker 1>That's real. So what was the feeling at your at

0:22:13.320 --> 0:22:16.639
<v Speaker 1>the Goldman conference about just crypto just generally? I it

0:22:16.760 --> 0:22:19.239
<v Speaker 1>was funny. I was on radio with um, you know,

0:22:19.600 --> 0:22:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Alex and Guy, and I made this comment about how

0:22:22.520 --> 0:22:24.480
<v Speaker 1>nobody in that room was going to cry a river

0:22:24.640 --> 0:22:29.560
<v Speaker 1>about cryptocurrencies falling off a cliff, and very senior bank

0:22:29.560 --> 0:22:31.480
<v Speaker 1>executive walks over to me and hears me say that

0:22:31.520 --> 0:22:35.000
<v Speaker 1>and just starts laughing and walks away. So yeah, I

0:22:35.000 --> 0:22:38.480
<v Speaker 1>mean they're pretty thrilled because that talent war for them

0:22:38.720 --> 0:22:41.040
<v Speaker 1>is gone. And another executive told me everyone that left

0:22:41.040 --> 0:22:44.640
<v Speaker 1>their bank Goldman Sachs is now calling back again and

0:22:44.680 --> 0:22:47.600
<v Speaker 1>saying what can I come back, which is, as you know,

0:22:47.840 --> 0:22:52.240
<v Speaker 1>not a common practice of these branks. All Right, Sanelli Baskett,

0:22:52.240 --> 0:22:54.480
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much. We appreciate it. Selie bast she's

0:22:54.480 --> 0:22:57.320
<v Speaker 1>our Wall streetporter. She was at the Goldman conference getting

0:22:57.359 --> 0:23:01.119
<v Speaker 1>some great, great interviews Brian moynihan, Mr Solomon and Goldman,

0:23:01.200 --> 0:23:03.879
<v Speaker 1>so some good good stuff. We appreciate that. Alison Williams

0:23:03.960 --> 0:23:08.440
<v Speaker 1>as always Bloomberg Intelligence. She's our senior banks analysts, covers

0:23:08.480 --> 0:23:11.000
<v Speaker 1>everything anything you want to know about the banks. She

0:23:11.080 --> 0:23:13.600
<v Speaker 1>knows that she's been doing this, uh four decades. We

0:23:13.600 --> 0:23:16.240
<v Speaker 1>appreciate getting both of them here in our Bloomberg Interactive

0:23:16.280 --> 0:23:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Broker's studio. Now, let's get to Kevin Tynan right now.

0:23:23.640 --> 0:23:29.200
<v Speaker 1>He is our automotive senior automotive analysts from Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:23:29.320 --> 0:23:33.560
<v Speaker 1>He's somewhere in the armpit of America? Is he in

0:23:33.600 --> 0:23:39.800
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey? That you keep playing that game. I'm just messing.

0:23:39.840 --> 0:23:42.480
<v Speaker 1>We've got enough people in. I'm just messing with you.

0:23:42.560 --> 0:23:45.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm just messing with you. Kevin Um What a ride

0:23:45.960 --> 0:23:52.160
<v Speaker 1>for especially dealers? Right? UM last year was insane? Uh.

0:23:52.200 --> 0:23:55.080
<v Speaker 1>In terms of inventory, they had troubles. In terms of pricing,

0:23:55.119 --> 0:23:57.080
<v Speaker 1>it was off the charts. And then there were some

0:23:57.160 --> 0:24:00.720
<v Speaker 1>stocks like Carbonna which were crazy easy. What was the

0:24:00.760 --> 0:24:05.720
<v Speaker 1>trading it like three d and now um an analyst

0:24:05.760 --> 0:24:08.680
<v Speaker 1>is slashing it down to one dollar? Is this? Uh?

0:24:08.760 --> 0:24:11.240
<v Speaker 1>This is not an industry problem with Carbona, right, this

0:24:11.359 --> 0:24:15.320
<v Speaker 1>is a company specific issue. Yeah. I believe so. I

0:24:15.320 --> 0:24:18.639
<v Speaker 1>mean I think when you look at it fundamentally and

0:24:18.760 --> 0:24:22.320
<v Speaker 1>part of the problem, amongst many other things with carbon

0:24:22.560 --> 0:24:26.880
<v Speaker 1>is that they are used vehicle only, right and and

0:24:27.520 --> 0:24:29.800
<v Speaker 1>one of the things I like about the retail automotive

0:24:29.840 --> 0:24:35.360
<v Speaker 1>space is that a full line legacy dealer can diversify

0:24:35.480 --> 0:24:38.879
<v Speaker 1>its revenue and sort of hop to the hot business units.

0:24:38.920 --> 0:24:44.920
<v Speaker 1>So when new vehicle margin was gross margin was below five,

0:24:45.760 --> 0:24:49.200
<v Speaker 1>you started to see a push towards the used vehicle market,

0:24:49.240 --> 0:24:52.840
<v Speaker 1>where that gross margin could be double UM. And that's

0:24:52.880 --> 0:24:57.840
<v Speaker 1>where legacy dealerships would create private label CARBONNA, pops up,

0:24:57.960 --> 0:25:00.919
<v Speaker 1>room shift and all these other things. Uh. The problem

0:25:00.960 --> 0:25:05.040
<v Speaker 1>is as that market shifts, UH, supply is constrained on

0:25:05.080 --> 0:25:08.199
<v Speaker 1>the new side and gross margin goes to twelve on

0:25:08.280 --> 0:25:12.840
<v Speaker 1>new vehicles, Carbon can't go anywhere right there. CarMax is

0:25:12.880 --> 0:25:16.280
<v Speaker 1>a similar story right there, only doing used vehicles, so

0:25:16.320 --> 0:25:19.520
<v Speaker 1>they have less flexibility to kind of go where the

0:25:19.640 --> 0:25:22.840
<v Speaker 1>margin is. And I would also put parts in service

0:25:22.880 --> 0:25:26.520
<v Speaker 1>in that as well, where legacy dealers can do that business.

0:25:27.080 --> 0:25:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Where CARBONA and CarMax are beholden only to use vehicle market, Kevin,

0:25:33.600 --> 0:25:36.720
<v Speaker 1>are the US automakers Are they producing as many cars

0:25:36.920 --> 0:25:40.239
<v Speaker 1>as they want to use? The supply chain cleaned up?

0:25:40.240 --> 0:25:42.359
<v Speaker 1>Do they have enough labor. Are they producing where they

0:25:42.359 --> 0:25:45.880
<v Speaker 1>want to produce in terms of volume? Yeah, I think

0:25:45.920 --> 0:25:48.720
<v Speaker 1>so we're getting back there. I just looked at the

0:25:48.760 --> 0:25:51.480
<v Speaker 1>December one inventory levels in the US and it was

0:25:51.520 --> 0:25:55.240
<v Speaker 1>about one point seven million dollar units, and that was

0:25:55.560 --> 0:25:58.800
<v Speaker 1>that's about double right at the bottom. It was under

0:25:58.840 --> 0:26:01.560
<v Speaker 1>a million. At the peak it was over four million.

0:26:01.680 --> 0:26:07.760
<v Speaker 1>So obviously we're not anywhere near oversupplied in historical terms. Um.

0:26:07.840 --> 0:26:10.320
<v Speaker 1>But but that kind of inventory level, like a one

0:26:10.359 --> 0:26:14.240
<v Speaker 1>point seven million if you think about it, the the

0:26:14.320 --> 0:26:17.520
<v Speaker 1>industry will average about one to one point five million

0:26:17.640 --> 0:26:24.480
<v Speaker 1>unit transactions per month, So we're kind of appropriate supplied. Uh,

0:26:24.680 --> 0:26:29.080
<v Speaker 1>you want to be a little bit above thirty days supply.

0:26:29.240 --> 0:26:30.920
<v Speaker 1>We're getting back to that, but you don't want to

0:26:30.960 --> 0:26:34.600
<v Speaker 1>be where we were, which was days. But you also

0:26:34.640 --> 0:26:38.280
<v Speaker 1>don't want to be, um, looking at lots that are

0:26:38.320 --> 0:26:41.640
<v Speaker 1>all completely full and having buyers come in and um,

0:26:41.680 --> 0:26:43.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, try and get five or ten thousand dollars

0:26:43.800 --> 0:26:45.840
<v Speaker 1>off the price. Are we going to ever get back

0:26:45.840 --> 0:26:50.240
<v Speaker 1>to that? Um? Well, ever is a long time. But

0:26:50.640 --> 0:26:51.720
<v Speaker 1>are we going to get back to that in the

0:26:51.800 --> 0:26:54.400
<v Speaker 1>next couple of years? I? I don't think so. And

0:26:54.400 --> 0:26:58.040
<v Speaker 1>and look, it's just it's bad for everybody, right, It's

0:26:58.080 --> 0:27:01.280
<v Speaker 1>bad for the manufacturers, it's bad for the dealerships that

0:27:01.880 --> 0:27:06.800
<v Speaker 1>carrying costs um. So I think that the not it's

0:27:06.840 --> 0:27:10.200
<v Speaker 1>not random, right, it's not just the way the market moves,

0:27:10.240 --> 0:27:13.280
<v Speaker 1>and the dealers and the manufacturers are just stuck in

0:27:13.280 --> 0:27:17.720
<v Speaker 1>this loop of over supply. They control the output um,

0:27:17.800 --> 0:27:20.520
<v Speaker 1>the manufacturers do, and then the dealers can only sell

0:27:20.560 --> 0:27:22.720
<v Speaker 1>what they're given. And I think everybody has seen the

0:27:22.800 --> 0:27:27.200
<v Speaker 1>light in terms of price and margin in this environment

0:27:27.240 --> 0:27:29.240
<v Speaker 1>and said, this is actually a pretty good place to be.

0:27:29.440 --> 0:27:31.240
<v Speaker 1>I think we're in that window where we're tweaking it

0:27:31.280 --> 0:27:33.199
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. Let's get a couple more units on

0:27:33.240 --> 0:27:36.159
<v Speaker 1>the ground and not lose sales um. But we certainly

0:27:36.200 --> 0:27:38.200
<v Speaker 1>don't want to go back to four million units on

0:27:38.240 --> 0:27:40.399
<v Speaker 1>the ground. All right, I gotta talk to you about

0:27:40.520 --> 0:27:45.480
<v Speaker 1>something that kind of grinds my gears. Using a good metaphor,

0:27:46.440 --> 0:27:51.600
<v Speaker 1>we have a situation with some carmakers. Mercedes is one,

0:27:51.840 --> 0:27:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Volvo is another. BMW infamously another where they're making people

0:27:56.680 --> 0:27:59.879
<v Speaker 1>pay for over the air updates to access features that

0:28:00.000 --> 0:28:02.879
<v Speaker 1>are already in the car. For example, BMW wants you

0:28:02.960 --> 0:28:07.159
<v Speaker 1>to subscribe to heated seats. Yeah, so your seats and

0:28:07.320 --> 0:28:09.760
<v Speaker 1>you buy the car from them, right, your seats have

0:28:09.880 --> 0:28:12.800
<v Speaker 1>heating capability, but unless you give them eight dollars a

0:28:12.800 --> 0:28:14.960
<v Speaker 1>month or something, they won't let you turn it on

0:28:15.359 --> 0:28:19.320
<v Speaker 1>through over the air software updates. Now, recently I saw

0:28:19.600 --> 0:28:24.320
<v Speaker 1>a situation where Mercedes was doing the same thing with horsepower.

0:28:24.480 --> 0:28:26.639
<v Speaker 1>They're they're gonna sell you a car that has I

0:28:26.640 --> 0:28:28.600
<v Speaker 1>don't know the exact numbers, but like three hundred horse

0:28:28.600 --> 0:28:32.159
<v Speaker 1>power and if you want four hundred horse power, you

0:28:32.240 --> 0:28:35.000
<v Speaker 1>need to be giving them like a thousand dollars a year.

0:28:35.160 --> 0:28:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Or Volvo um is doing the same thing, although fortunately

0:28:38.320 --> 0:28:40.440
<v Speaker 1>at least they're doing it as a one time charge.

0:28:41.160 --> 0:28:45.640
<v Speaker 1>This is a horrible new Frontier Kevin, it is, And

0:28:45.640 --> 0:28:47.320
<v Speaker 1>and think about what that would do to the used

0:28:47.400 --> 0:28:51.040
<v Speaker 1>vehicle market, right, what are you actually buying is is

0:28:51.120 --> 0:28:54.920
<v Speaker 1>every vehicle wiped clean when you see it on the lot.

0:28:55.000 --> 0:28:59.800
<v Speaker 1>So essentially you have to menu up your vehicle if

0:28:59.800 --> 0:29:03.560
<v Speaker 1>you're buying pre owned also, so it's a strange thing,

0:29:03.720 --> 0:29:06.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, And then think about how how are you

0:29:08.320 --> 0:29:12.520
<v Speaker 1>um buying wholesale vehicles? Like is everything go back to

0:29:12.600 --> 0:29:17.200
<v Speaker 1>a base vehicle when it changes hands? And then and

0:29:17.240 --> 0:29:19.440
<v Speaker 1>as a consumer, do my heated seats that I paid

0:29:19.480 --> 0:29:21.800
<v Speaker 1>BMW four come with me to my next one? Or

0:29:22.280 --> 0:29:25.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's it's a strange thing, and I've yet

0:29:25.600 --> 0:29:28.600
<v Speaker 1>to believe that it can actually work over the long term.

0:29:28.920 --> 0:29:31.600
<v Speaker 1>All right, and that your industry continues to go under

0:29:31.720 --> 0:29:35.200
<v Speaker 1>tremendous change. Kevin Tiden, senior autos analysts with Bloomberg Intelligence

0:29:35.240 --> 0:29:40.760
<v Speaker 1>with some great stuff. Uh there? All right? So I

0:29:40.800 --> 0:29:42.840
<v Speaker 1>want to talk technology because you know, when he came

0:29:42.840 --> 0:29:45.920
<v Speaker 1>out of the last quarters earnings, to me, it felt

0:29:46.000 --> 0:29:48.120
<v Speaker 1>like there are a lot of disappointments around the tech

0:29:48.120 --> 0:29:50.280
<v Speaker 1>space and I'm wondering if the tech sector has lost

0:29:50.320 --> 0:29:54.520
<v Speaker 1>its leadership role in this market. I want to talk Apple, Amazon, Google,

0:29:54.520 --> 0:29:56.880
<v Speaker 1>all that kind of stuff. So we're gonna roundtable this thing, folks.

0:29:57.080 --> 0:29:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Mark German, he's a reporter. He covers Apple, that covers

0:29:59.840 --> 0:30:02.240
<v Speaker 1>all the consumer tech and hardware. Is that in our

0:30:02.280 --> 0:30:04.960
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco office? Usually sometimes I find him in the

0:30:05.000 --> 0:30:06.800
<v Speaker 1>desert doing stuff. I don't know what's going on there

0:30:06.840 --> 0:30:10.120
<v Speaker 1>with rockets and stuff. Um and then also on rock Rona.

0:30:10.240 --> 0:30:15.920
<v Speaker 1>He is our senior technology analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence. Um. So, Mark,

0:30:15.960 --> 0:30:17.800
<v Speaker 1>I want to start with you because there's a lot

0:30:17.800 --> 0:30:21.000
<v Speaker 1>of news add on Apple here today. I'm not I

0:30:21.000 --> 0:30:23.640
<v Speaker 1>don't get this fully autonomous car thing from the get go.

0:30:24.320 --> 0:30:26.280
<v Speaker 1>But Apple seem to throw it's hat in the ring

0:30:26.320 --> 0:30:28.680
<v Speaker 1>there a while back. But are they kind of pulling

0:30:28.720 --> 0:30:31.760
<v Speaker 1>back from that here? And if so, why they're pulling

0:30:31.760 --> 0:30:34.840
<v Speaker 1>back initially? So Tim Cook gets asked this all the

0:30:34.880 --> 0:30:37.240
<v Speaker 1>time when Apple comes out with the new products. What

0:30:37.400 --> 0:30:41.360
<v Speaker 1>took you so long? Right? Other companies have had phones, watches,

0:30:41.600 --> 0:30:45.560
<v Speaker 1>sets up boxes, etcetera, tablets forever and now you guys

0:30:45.560 --> 0:30:48.320
<v Speaker 1>are doing that. What's the difference? What he likes to say,

0:30:48.440 --> 0:30:52.719
<v Speaker 1>and what is in my opinion absolutely true, is we

0:30:52.760 --> 0:30:55.440
<v Speaker 1>wanted to be the best, not the first. We wanted

0:30:55.480 --> 0:30:57.720
<v Speaker 1>to do things a little bit differently. Right, So the

0:30:57.760 --> 0:31:00.720
<v Speaker 1>iPhone wasn't the first smartphone, but there was nothing before.

0:31:01.040 --> 0:31:03.080
<v Speaker 1>You can see the same about the iPod to the

0:31:03.160 --> 0:31:07.320
<v Speaker 1>MP three player. The Apple watched the smart watch, etcetera, etcetera,

0:31:07.720 --> 0:31:09.640
<v Speaker 1>And so they wanted to come at the car with

0:31:09.680 --> 0:31:13.880
<v Speaker 1>the same approach, and they, along with every other car manufacturer,

0:31:14.280 --> 0:31:18.160
<v Speaker 1>decided that the real holy grail, the real differentiator for

0:31:18.200 --> 0:31:20.120
<v Speaker 1>how you can make a car different than anything that's

0:31:20.160 --> 0:31:23.760
<v Speaker 1>come before it is level five full self driving, tell

0:31:23.840 --> 0:31:26.160
<v Speaker 1>the car where you want to go, it gets you there,

0:31:26.600 --> 0:31:31.160
<v Speaker 1>no issue. Right, that is just not possible. It's not feasible,

0:31:31.240 --> 0:31:33.520
<v Speaker 1>and it's probably not going to be feasible for twenty

0:31:33.600 --> 0:31:36.440
<v Speaker 1>thirty years, if not even in our lifetime. So in

0:31:36.560 --> 0:31:39.080
<v Speaker 1>order to get something on the road this decade, because

0:31:39.080 --> 0:31:41.120
<v Speaker 1>that is going to be a hot area, they needed

0:31:41.160 --> 0:31:43.320
<v Speaker 1>to pair back. And so what they're doing is they're

0:31:43.320 --> 0:31:46.480
<v Speaker 1>moving to a level four design, which means they're scrapping

0:31:46.520 --> 0:31:49.120
<v Speaker 1>their vision of no steering wheel and no pedals. They're

0:31:49.120 --> 0:31:51.080
<v Speaker 1>going to have those key parts of the car as

0:31:51.080 --> 0:31:53.160
<v Speaker 1>we all know, and it's only going to have self

0:31:53.240 --> 0:31:56.600
<v Speaker 1>driving functionality in places like highways and freeways. So that

0:31:56.720 --> 0:31:58.840
<v Speaker 1>is a major shift, and they're really going to have

0:31:58.920 --> 0:32:03.800
<v Speaker 1>to compete on area technology, on industrial design, on software

0:32:04.080 --> 0:32:05.760
<v Speaker 1>and other features that you might want in a car

0:32:05.800 --> 0:32:08.400
<v Speaker 1>in the future. And handling. You know, one of the

0:32:08.400 --> 0:32:10.480
<v Speaker 1>things I love about my iPhone is how it handles,

0:32:10.880 --> 0:32:13.400
<v Speaker 1>and I want a car that handles just as well.

0:32:13.520 --> 0:32:15.960
<v Speaker 1>So I mean, who are they going to work with.

0:32:16.120 --> 0:32:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Is it a Porsche or is it a Kia. That's funny, Yes,

0:32:19.680 --> 0:32:22.560
<v Speaker 1>I definitely want an Apple car. That will you can

0:32:22.600 --> 0:32:25.040
<v Speaker 1>get me whoever I want to go at as fast

0:32:25.080 --> 0:32:27.640
<v Speaker 1>as I can, right, I'll always take a need for

0:32:27.720 --> 0:32:31.000
<v Speaker 1>speed type of of car. I think it's going to

0:32:31.080 --> 0:32:34.880
<v Speaker 1>be something closer to a Porsche. I think it's something

0:32:34.920 --> 0:32:38.400
<v Speaker 1>that's probably going to cost around a hundred thousand per unit.

0:32:38.520 --> 0:32:40.920
<v Speaker 1>This is going to be a consumer car. It's probably

0:32:40.960 --> 0:32:44.680
<v Speaker 1>going to be in the same territory as a baseline

0:32:44.760 --> 0:32:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Tesla models. Originally they were going to go for a

0:32:49.040 --> 0:32:51.280
<v Speaker 1>higher price point that would put it in the Porsche

0:32:51.400 --> 0:32:53.960
<v Speaker 1>take Hand range, selling on the higher end take Hands

0:32:53.960 --> 0:32:56.760
<v Speaker 1>in the north of a hundred and fifty thousand US,

0:32:56.840 --> 0:33:00.640
<v Speaker 1>but now they're downscaling. Uh. There had been rooms about

0:33:00.680 --> 0:33:04.000
<v Speaker 1>them doing something more on the Kia spectrum, even working

0:33:04.000 --> 0:33:06.640
<v Speaker 1>with con Day and Kia. I'm told those rumors were

0:33:06.680 --> 0:33:10.440
<v Speaker 1>never true and they were probably floated by those companies

0:33:10.480 --> 0:33:13.440
<v Speaker 1>in Asia. There has been some accusations that I heard

0:33:13.440 --> 0:33:17.200
<v Speaker 1>about trying to you know, inflate their stock prices. But

0:33:17.600 --> 0:33:19.600
<v Speaker 1>who really knows. The truth of the matter is it

0:33:19.600 --> 0:33:22.400
<v Speaker 1>will be something closer to a model as I think

0:33:22.440 --> 0:33:26.720
<v Speaker 1>it will probably do incredibly well. And I'm sure you'll

0:33:26.720 --> 0:33:29.320
<v Speaker 1>ask on rock this, but the quickest way for Apple

0:33:29.400 --> 0:33:32.080
<v Speaker 1>to sort of triple its revenues over time is to

0:33:32.120 --> 0:33:35.680
<v Speaker 1>come out with a hundred thousand dollar product, right, So yeah,

0:33:35.680 --> 0:33:37.920
<v Speaker 1>exact way that they're going to inflate their own revenue.

0:33:38.520 --> 0:33:41.560
<v Speaker 1>What do you think about it? Yeah, let's hope they

0:33:41.560 --> 0:33:44.200
<v Speaker 1>don't come up with a model because you can't make

0:33:44.240 --> 0:33:46.520
<v Speaker 1>any money off of it. You know, in my view,

0:33:46.680 --> 0:33:49.240
<v Speaker 1>you don't want to go down the you know, the

0:33:49.280 --> 0:33:52.720
<v Speaker 1>price point. They will go out for whatever product they

0:33:52.760 --> 0:33:56.160
<v Speaker 1>go out at at a you know, gross mog and

0:33:56.280 --> 0:33:59.320
<v Speaker 1>that's the style Apple goes. It doesn't care about markets

0:33:59.360 --> 0:34:01.640
<v Speaker 1>here from a any point of view. It care about

0:34:01.680 --> 0:34:05.080
<v Speaker 1>gross profit margins. And I'm you know, very optimistic that's

0:34:05.120 --> 0:34:07.560
<v Speaker 1>what they're focusing on. And they don't you know, cheapen

0:34:07.600 --> 0:34:12.120
<v Speaker 1>the car, so so an just across the text space,

0:34:12.400 --> 0:34:15.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's the rose the bloom kind of came

0:34:15.920 --> 0:34:17.480
<v Speaker 1>off the roads a little bit for me at least,

0:34:17.520 --> 0:34:19.719
<v Speaker 1>and I'm wondering if it's true for the market. After

0:34:19.800 --> 0:34:23.239
<v Speaker 1>the last quarters earnings, we had some disappointments, some cautious

0:34:23.280 --> 0:34:26.239
<v Speaker 1>outlooks as you talk to institutional investors, kind of what's

0:34:26.280 --> 0:34:30.400
<v Speaker 1>the feeling out there about tech in general? So I

0:34:30.440 --> 0:34:33.160
<v Speaker 1>think Paul. In all honesty, I think the cell side

0:34:33.200 --> 0:34:36.520
<v Speaker 1>truly forgot what a recession or slowdown looks like. If

0:34:36.560 --> 0:34:38.960
<v Speaker 1>I look at the top twenty software company, they have

0:34:39.040 --> 0:34:41.920
<v Speaker 1>been growing sales at the rate of twenty percent per

0:34:42.040 --> 0:34:44.719
<v Speaker 1>year for the past six years. So you know, there

0:34:44.719 --> 0:34:47.560
<v Speaker 1>has to be a time when when the economic activity

0:34:47.640 --> 0:34:50.240
<v Speaker 1>slows down that people will pull back onto eke spending.

0:34:50.520 --> 0:34:53.160
<v Speaker 1>And I don't think anybody remembers eight oh nine, And

0:34:53.200 --> 0:34:55.120
<v Speaker 1>I think this is the time that they are coming

0:34:55.160 --> 0:34:58.760
<v Speaker 1>back to the realization that everything slows down in a downturn.

0:34:59.120 --> 0:35:01.640
<v Speaker 1>And I think, frankly speaking, at this point, I see

0:35:01.719 --> 0:35:04.440
<v Speaker 1>numbers for next year, I feel a little bit happier

0:35:04.520 --> 0:35:07.960
<v Speaker 1>than I did prior to the last quarter. But if

0:35:08.000 --> 0:35:13.080
<v Speaker 1>we get into a deep procession, um I mean, probably

0:35:13.120 --> 0:35:16.520
<v Speaker 1>the first thing that people do when they tighten their

0:35:16.520 --> 0:35:19.960
<v Speaker 1>belts is not buy a new iPhone, right, I mean,

0:35:20.000 --> 0:35:22.520
<v Speaker 1>you only buy one when you absolutely have to, if

0:35:22.560 --> 0:35:26.719
<v Speaker 1>you can't justify. He always buys the newest model. He

0:35:26.760 --> 0:35:28.879
<v Speaker 1>always buys the newest model because he has a great

0:35:28.920 --> 0:35:31.600
<v Speaker 1>job with a great company. But if he loses his job,

0:35:32.160 --> 0:35:36.080
<v Speaker 1>he's probably not going to Um no, absolutely right, Yeah,

0:35:36.160 --> 0:35:38.320
<v Speaker 1>you have it, right, I mean see from an enterprise

0:35:38.360 --> 0:35:40.440
<v Speaker 1>point of view, it's the same argument that you make.

0:35:40.760 --> 0:35:42.680
<v Speaker 1>But frankly speaking, one of the things you also have

0:35:42.760 --> 0:35:46.799
<v Speaker 1>to think about is the technologies that you're spending with Microsoft,

0:35:46.880 --> 0:35:50.360
<v Speaker 1>with Google, with the likes of it, take sales Force

0:35:50.440 --> 0:35:54.000
<v Speaker 1>or Workday or Shopify. These companies are critical to making

0:35:54.000 --> 0:35:56.600
<v Speaker 1>your company go digital. It's not as if this is

0:35:56.640 --> 0:35:58.719
<v Speaker 1>these are you know, an ad hoc product that you

0:35:58.760 --> 0:36:01.560
<v Speaker 1>get just because you know it's a shiny new object

0:36:01.960 --> 0:36:03.880
<v Speaker 1>and what we think is going to happen. You know,

0:36:04.120 --> 0:36:06.200
<v Speaker 1>we saw that the a w IS very clearly. During

0:36:06.239 --> 0:36:09.600
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic, growth slowed down because the sectors that operate

0:36:09.640 --> 0:36:12.000
<v Speaker 1>with them slowed down. But the year after that we

0:36:12.040 --> 0:36:15.080
<v Speaker 1>saw a massive bounce back because digital spending has to

0:36:15.080 --> 0:36:17.399
<v Speaker 1>be done. You have to go digital. It's it's not

0:36:17.480 --> 0:36:20.920
<v Speaker 1>something it's not a fashion, it's something that's required for

0:36:20.960 --> 0:36:23.200
<v Speaker 1>you to do. So we think if you thinks slow

0:36:23.280 --> 0:36:27.600
<v Speaker 1>down in twenty three, we think a massive bounce back. Hey,

0:36:27.600 --> 0:36:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Mark your base in l A, San Francisco. I thought

0:36:31.360 --> 0:36:34.680
<v Speaker 1>in l A, Mark, Yeah, yeah, So it changes my

0:36:34.840 --> 0:36:37.600
<v Speaker 1>entire vision of Mark German. Well, he's just he's m

0:36:37.960 --> 0:36:40.239
<v Speaker 1>Mr California in general. I mean, what's the feeling a

0:36:40.239 --> 0:36:42.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of your companies that you cover, Mark, A lot

0:36:42.120 --> 0:36:45.080
<v Speaker 1>of the consumer technology companies, they've been laying some people off.

0:36:45.120 --> 0:36:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Here is is it? Is it a thing? Wow? It's

0:36:49.640 --> 0:36:53.320
<v Speaker 1>definitely a thing. Who would have ever thought that Amazon

0:36:53.440 --> 0:36:56.680
<v Speaker 1>and Meta would start cutting north to five seven, ten

0:36:56.760 --> 0:37:01.400
<v Speaker 1>thousand people right when you know the economy is really

0:37:01.440 --> 0:37:04.680
<v Speaker 1>in the in the trash? Is if Apple starts cutting people.

0:37:04.840 --> 0:37:08.120
<v Speaker 1>To date, they have not started cutting people. They're not hiring,

0:37:08.120 --> 0:37:10.360
<v Speaker 1>which is a really really big deal. There's a complete

0:37:10.360 --> 0:37:13.320
<v Speaker 1>pause there. But they're not firing or laying off anyone.

0:37:13.800 --> 0:37:16.160
<v Speaker 1>All right, Mark, good stuff? Mark German. Uh. He is

0:37:16.200 --> 0:37:20.120
<v Speaker 1>our consumer tech uh reporter out there in l A

0:37:20.320 --> 0:37:23.800
<v Speaker 1>covering all that cool consumer tech stuff. Big big focus

0:37:23.840 --> 0:37:27.000
<v Speaker 1>on Apple because why not. It's a huge company. And Anagrana,

0:37:27.320 --> 0:37:31.320
<v Speaker 1>he's our senior technology analysts for Bloomberg Intelligence kind of

0:37:31.400 --> 0:37:33.120
<v Speaker 1>round table and you're talking about tech. You know, it's

0:37:33.160 --> 0:37:36.000
<v Speaker 1>it's been such a leader in this market for such

0:37:36.080 --> 0:37:40.080
<v Speaker 1>a long period of time. Um, But as Anorag suggested, Um,

0:37:40.160 --> 0:37:42.600
<v Speaker 1>they're impacted by the headwinds of a recession as well.

0:37:42.640 --> 0:37:45.239
<v Speaker 1>Maybe not as much as other industries, but certainly there

0:37:45.280 --> 0:37:47.080
<v Speaker 1>is an impact, and kind of where we're seeing it

0:37:47.160 --> 0:37:50.040
<v Speaker 1>is in the head count, seeing a lot of headcount

0:37:50.080 --> 0:37:52.200
<v Speaker 1>being like a technology, so I have to keep an

0:37:52.200 --> 0:37:58.680
<v Speaker 1>eye on that. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast.

0:37:59.080 --> 0:38:02.280
<v Speaker 1>You can subscribe and listen to interviews of Apple Podcasts

0:38:02.400 --> 0:38:06.319
<v Speaker 1>or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm

0:38:06.360 --> 0:38:10.400
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Matt Miller three. Put on fall Sweeney.

0:38:10.400 --> 0:38:13.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney Before the podcast. You

0:38:13.080 --> 0:38:15.479
<v Speaker 1>can always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio.