WEBVTT - Microsoft Backs ChatGPT, Elliott Invests in Salesforce

0:00:14.120 --> 0:00:18.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm Caroline Hyde up Bloomberg's San Francisco studio. Welcome for

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:21.160
<v Speaker 1>New York. Together back in San Francisco and d Lovelow.

0:00:21.239 --> 0:00:23.959
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Technology and how nice it is to

0:00:24.000 --> 0:00:26.920
<v Speaker 1>have you here, so many headlines to pass over many

0:00:26.960 --> 0:00:29.000
<v Speaker 1>of the market moving when there's some feel good right

0:00:29.000 --> 0:00:31.760
<v Speaker 1>now around technology, despite layoffs, despite everything that's going on,

0:00:31.920 --> 0:00:34.800
<v Speaker 1>and it is centric to being in San Francisco this

0:00:34.800 --> 0:00:36.839
<v Speaker 1>week with all the earnings to come, first and foremost,

0:00:36.840 --> 0:00:39.680
<v Speaker 1>we talk about valuations here in Silicon Valley. Microsoft's ten

0:00:39.760 --> 0:00:42.560
<v Speaker 1>billion bet on open Ai is just the start of

0:00:42.560 --> 0:00:46.280
<v Speaker 1>the artificial intelligence revolution, is what Microsoft's chief product officer

0:00:46.400 --> 0:00:49.520
<v Speaker 1>is pitching as quote the defining technology of our time

0:00:49.920 --> 0:00:53.000
<v Speaker 1>and more local to us. Elliott's multibillion dollars stake in

0:00:53.120 --> 0:00:56.320
<v Speaker 1>sales Force comes as a way of the activist investors

0:00:56.360 --> 0:00:59.720
<v Speaker 1>pushed companies to act more on behalf of their shareholders.

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:03.560
<v Speaker 1>And we now know what Apple's mixed reality headset is

0:01:03.600 --> 0:01:06.640
<v Speaker 1>capable of as a company explores a new approach to

0:01:06.840 --> 0:01:10.440
<v Speaker 1>eye and hand tracking controls. But first let's do it.

0:01:10.480 --> 0:01:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Let's get to how the focus on any investment management

0:01:13.080 --> 0:01:15.280
<v Speaker 1>has had us all eyes on the tower that is

0:01:15.319 --> 0:01:18.039
<v Speaker 1>here in San Francisco. Of course, what is Mark Benioff,

0:01:18.120 --> 0:01:20.720
<v Speaker 1>Where is his focus now? And what does the activist

0:01:20.760 --> 0:01:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Steake really mean for his business? Swooping in of course

0:01:24.040 --> 0:01:26.760
<v Speaker 1>after layoffs, after deep stop plunge at the enterprise software

0:01:26.760 --> 0:01:29.679
<v Speaker 1>giant mean Wes Leana Veka is more every New York Leanna,

0:01:29.959 --> 0:01:32.119
<v Speaker 1>As I sit here in San Francisco, and I think

0:01:32.480 --> 0:01:35.920
<v Speaker 1>of initially the worry Mimmi many had for Mark Benioff.

0:01:35.920 --> 0:01:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps as we've seen some of the other executives shed away,

0:01:39.880 --> 0:01:41.679
<v Speaker 1>many thought maybe that meant he was going to be

0:01:41.720 --> 0:01:44.640
<v Speaker 1>doing more dealmaking, spending more. But does an investor like

0:01:44.680 --> 0:01:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Elliott mean that's off the cards? At this point, we

0:01:47.880 --> 0:01:50.480
<v Speaker 1>don't know exactly what Elliott is pushing for, but we

0:01:50.600 --> 0:01:53.680
<v Speaker 1>have seen their public statement that was pretty complimentary of

0:01:53.760 --> 0:01:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Mark Bennioff, so it doesn't look like it'll be a

0:01:56.080 --> 0:02:00.200
<v Speaker 1>nasty fight. That said, Elliott Management has taken on so

0:02:00.360 --> 0:02:03.360
<v Speaker 1>many big tech companies over time that have made so

0:02:03.400 --> 0:02:06.160
<v Speaker 1>many changes, so there could really be a range of

0:02:06.200 --> 0:02:08.760
<v Speaker 1>things that they would like. I think ultimately they want

0:02:08.800 --> 0:02:11.079
<v Speaker 1>the stock to go up and that they believe there's

0:02:11.080 --> 0:02:15.440
<v Speaker 1>probably ways for shareholder value to be improved, you know, Leona,

0:02:16.840 --> 0:02:21.399
<v Speaker 1>this time around Salesforce, Elliot's name crosses the Bloomberg terminal monthly.

0:02:21.480 --> 0:02:24.639
<v Speaker 1>It seems to me, you know, the cadence of their investments,

0:02:24.639 --> 0:02:27.440
<v Speaker 1>what is their track record on working with companies? Because

0:02:27.480 --> 0:02:30.640
<v Speaker 1>you said you read the statement from the company deep

0:02:30.760 --> 0:02:33.560
<v Speaker 1>respect for Mark Bennioff was the word they used. It

0:02:33.600 --> 0:02:36.440
<v Speaker 1>doesn't seem hostile. It seems they want to work with

0:02:36.760 --> 0:02:39.440
<v Speaker 1>Mr Benioff over at Salesforce Tower. And one of the

0:02:39.480 --> 0:02:41.920
<v Speaker 1>reasons they might be wanting to work in a friendly

0:02:41.960 --> 0:02:44.480
<v Speaker 1>manner with the company is that I've been joking with

0:02:44.520 --> 0:02:48.960
<v Speaker 1>sources that Salesforce is now a hedge fund hotel. There's, uh,

0:02:49.080 --> 0:02:52.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, first there was Starboard, Now there's Elliott, Inclusive Capital,

0:02:52.800 --> 0:02:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Odden's firm. He used to be a value actors

0:02:55.480 --> 0:02:57.680
<v Speaker 1>in there. And then there's a mystery Activists that we're

0:02:57.680 --> 0:03:00.079
<v Speaker 1>trying to figure out. CNBC, you know, has report it

0:03:00.520 --> 0:03:03.240
<v Speaker 1>on that. So there might be a sense that maybe

0:03:03.280 --> 0:03:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Elliott's the White Knight activists to work with. In twenty nineteen,

0:03:07.400 --> 0:03:12.240
<v Speaker 1>eBay fell in the crosshairs of Elliott and also Starboard,

0:03:12.280 --> 0:03:14.680
<v Speaker 1>and they gave them both board seats. So That's another

0:03:14.840 --> 0:03:17.239
<v Speaker 1>example that we're kind of looking back in history to

0:03:17.280 --> 0:03:19.480
<v Speaker 1>see what could happen here. At this point, we don't

0:03:19.480 --> 0:03:22.120
<v Speaker 1>know if Salesforce is willing to offer those board seats,

0:03:22.120 --> 0:03:25.520
<v Speaker 1>but Jesse Cohen, who is the one leading the investment

0:03:25.520 --> 0:03:27.880
<v Speaker 1>for Ellie Management, he sat on some pretty big boards

0:03:29.320 --> 0:03:33.080
<v Speaker 1>and Leanna just put into perspective twenty twenty two, the

0:03:33.160 --> 0:03:36.840
<v Speaker 1>last quota, we saw so many more activist steaks really

0:03:36.880 --> 0:03:40.480
<v Speaker 1>being built globally worldwide. How many offenses are there? I

0:03:40.520 --> 0:03:43.080
<v Speaker 1>can already think of what Disney's outlet, Intel, how what

0:03:43.120 --> 0:03:46.000
<v Speaker 1>other companies? So you nailed it with Disney. That's kind

0:03:46.000 --> 0:03:49.000
<v Speaker 1>of the big one that the whole activist community is

0:03:49.040 --> 0:03:51.400
<v Speaker 1>watching because that looks like it's headed to an actual

0:03:51.440 --> 0:03:55.360
<v Speaker 1>shareholder vote at some point. Um Elliott doesn't usually get

0:03:55.400 --> 0:03:57.760
<v Speaker 1>to that shareholder vote, so I'd be surprised if that's

0:03:57.760 --> 0:04:01.040
<v Speaker 1>where Salesforce is headed. But right now we're entering this

0:04:01.160 --> 0:04:04.800
<v Speaker 1>what we call proxy season. These nomination windows are starting

0:04:04.800 --> 0:04:08.040
<v Speaker 1>to open at various companies, so we're seeing investors come

0:04:08.080 --> 0:04:11.040
<v Speaker 1>in and say, hey, we want to nominate shareholders. Salesforce's

0:04:11.080 --> 0:04:13.480
<v Speaker 1>window is coming up in February. We'll be watching that

0:04:13.560 --> 0:04:17.679
<v Speaker 1>really closely. All right, Bloomberg's the Aanna Baker who leads

0:04:17.680 --> 0:04:20.960
<v Speaker 1>our deals coverage investor coverage. Thank you so much, Caroline.

0:04:21.000 --> 0:04:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to San Francisco. If you jump in a cab acuet,

0:04:24.400 --> 0:04:28.560
<v Speaker 1>you go downtown whatever, no preference, but you'll see the

0:04:28.560 --> 0:04:30.720
<v Speaker 1>Salesforce tower. And this is what jumped out at me

0:04:30.720 --> 0:04:34.400
<v Speaker 1>on the Bloomberg terminal earlier, this single chart about salesforces

0:04:34.520 --> 0:04:37.679
<v Speaker 1>marketing spend as a percentage of its sales. You start

0:04:37.720 --> 0:04:40.840
<v Speaker 1>to realize what it is that investors, activists, investors might

0:04:40.880 --> 0:04:45.360
<v Speaker 1>be getting at. They're almost at fifty right of their

0:04:45.480 --> 0:04:49.080
<v Speaker 1>their sales spend being on marketing, which is kind of

0:04:49.320 --> 0:04:53.440
<v Speaker 1>mind blowing a little bit, right, But then they have potential.

0:04:53.560 --> 0:04:56.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, this is a software company margins it also

0:04:56.680 --> 0:04:58.880
<v Speaker 1>though that spend as largs you were on dream Force.

0:04:58.960 --> 0:05:00.840
<v Speaker 1>I think the last time we was. Lenny Kravitz is

0:05:00.880 --> 0:05:04.080
<v Speaker 1>performing there. These big parties. Basically it's a massive music festival.

0:05:04.120 --> 0:05:07.320
<v Speaker 1>It does a lot for the San Francisco ecosystem as well.

0:05:07.360 --> 0:05:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Those sorts of events they bring people to gatherings, which

0:05:10.560 --> 0:05:12.240
<v Speaker 1>are a city that they're really taking on the road

0:05:12.279 --> 0:05:15.080
<v Speaker 1>to the marketing spenders about being in people and in

0:05:15.160 --> 0:05:17.920
<v Speaker 1>person and sharing ideas. But they're probably going to want

0:05:17.960 --> 0:05:19.360
<v Speaker 1>him to pull back on that. And this is a

0:05:19.360 --> 0:05:20.880
<v Speaker 1>company that has had to pull off on the on

0:05:20.880 --> 0:05:24.039
<v Speaker 1>the layoffs front, you know, in pausing her in other areas,

0:05:24.080 --> 0:05:26.480
<v Speaker 1>and where M and A has been just absolutely right.

0:05:26.560 --> 0:05:28.160
<v Speaker 1>The other big story we're watching here out on the

0:05:28.200 --> 0:05:31.200
<v Speaker 1>West Coast is, of course, Microsoft and open Ai are

0:05:31.279 --> 0:05:34.880
<v Speaker 1>reported ten billion dollar investments set over a number of years,

0:05:35.200 --> 0:05:38.919
<v Speaker 1>which open Aron Microsoft have now confirmed sort of in

0:05:38.960 --> 0:05:43.080
<v Speaker 1>a blog, the company saying Microsoft will involve invest multiple

0:05:43.160 --> 0:05:45.479
<v Speaker 1>billions of dollars. Remember, this is a company that mass

0:05:45.560 --> 0:05:48.080
<v Speaker 1>more than a million users just within days of launch

0:05:48.400 --> 0:05:52.040
<v Speaker 1>back in November, and we've already started the debate where

0:05:52.040 --> 0:05:54.040
<v Speaker 1>does this all fit in with Microsoft strategy? Where does

0:05:54.040 --> 0:05:56.560
<v Speaker 1>it fit in our lives? The use of chat, GPT

0:05:56.680 --> 0:05:59.279
<v Speaker 1>and other AI tours a fascinating one, and also how

0:05:59.320 --> 0:06:02.240
<v Speaker 1>does this help soft gain market share from the likes

0:06:02.400 --> 0:06:05.440
<v Speaker 1>of aws. Now we know that Amazon is the power

0:06:05.480 --> 0:06:07.880
<v Speaker 1>player when it comes to the cloud provision. Overall the

0:06:07.920 --> 0:06:11.040
<v Speaker 1>fact that Microsoft wants to intertwine open Ai into every

0:06:11.960 --> 0:06:13.960
<v Speaker 1>really every part of Azure the business it wants to

0:06:14.000 --> 0:06:17.080
<v Speaker 1>set itself apart as a cloud offering, and open Eye

0:06:17.080 --> 0:06:18.880
<v Speaker 1>is such a clever way to do it. What's so interesting,

0:06:18.960 --> 0:06:20.880
<v Speaker 1>of course, is the open Eye once upon a time

0:06:20.960 --> 0:06:24.560
<v Speaker 1>was an off profit, now as a capped profit right company.

0:06:24.720 --> 0:06:27.120
<v Speaker 1>So this deal, there's ten million that's being invested. It's

0:06:27.160 --> 0:06:29.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of awkwardly done, isn't it, because you're kind of

0:06:29.320 --> 0:06:33.560
<v Speaker 1>being it's offering in kind. Basically open ai is able

0:06:33.680 --> 0:06:37.760
<v Speaker 1>to use the firepower of Microsoft's own cloud provisions, so

0:06:37.880 --> 0:06:41.240
<v Speaker 1>so it's a really significant investment from Microsoft seven days

0:06:41.400 --> 0:06:44.919
<v Speaker 1>after they have laid off ten thousand staff. But the

0:06:44.920 --> 0:06:47.640
<v Speaker 1>closed profit model is where basically any money that open

0:06:47.680 --> 0:06:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Ai mates, which is by licensing the tools to software developers,

0:06:51.320 --> 0:06:53.840
<v Speaker 1>they put back straight into the development because they still

0:06:53.839 --> 0:06:56.560
<v Speaker 1>feel like it's in the nascent stage, after they've paid investors,

0:06:56.640 --> 0:06:58.960
<v Speaker 1>after they've paid their dus, and after they pay their

0:06:58.960 --> 0:07:01.279
<v Speaker 1>own employees. Right, yeah, I mean, we've been trying to

0:07:01.320 --> 0:07:03.920
<v Speaker 1>identify what is the next big company for the next decade,

0:07:03.960 --> 0:07:06.320
<v Speaker 1>the next twenty years. You know, there's a lot of

0:07:06.800 --> 0:07:09.960
<v Speaker 1>debate whether actually open ai is it, and the emphasis

0:07:09.960 --> 0:07:11.720
<v Speaker 1>of them in the news cycles amazing, And you're right,

0:07:12.200 --> 0:07:15.120
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft are already implementing this and as you're cloud for customers.

0:07:15.160 --> 0:07:18.200
<v Speaker 1>You can use chat GPT or even dally on the

0:07:18.200 --> 0:07:20.200
<v Speaker 1>imaging side, So it's out there in the real world.

0:07:20.200 --> 0:07:22.400
<v Speaker 1>You and I have played with it to a lesser extent,

0:07:22.960 --> 0:07:26.320
<v Speaker 1>you know here on the show. But interesting a lot

0:07:26.320 --> 0:07:29.520
<v Speaker 1>of cash math on chat GPT. That was my learning,

0:07:29.560 --> 0:07:32.040
<v Speaker 1>my podcast learning over the course of the weekend. And

0:07:32.120 --> 0:07:33.760
<v Speaker 1>I can't tell you how nice it's about in San

0:07:33.760 --> 0:07:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Francisco known fat that chat GPT wouldn't tell you about

0:07:37.080 --> 0:07:40.280
<v Speaker 1>my family. My son's middle name is Francisco. That's how

0:07:40.320 --> 0:07:43.160
<v Speaker 1>much the city. Because of your time here, well, let's

0:07:43.200 --> 0:07:53.160
<v Speaker 1>make the most of it while you're here. We've might

0:07:53.200 --> 0:07:55.360
<v Speaker 1>have been positive. I'm big deck for I don't know

0:07:55.440 --> 0:07:57.520
<v Speaker 1>a year, a year and a half. We do believe

0:07:57.520 --> 0:08:00.200
<v Speaker 1>that there is still some deflation to come out of

0:08:00.200 --> 0:08:03.760
<v Speaker 1>this market after the exube. I actually think that the

0:08:03.800 --> 0:08:06.480
<v Speaker 1>tech sector is one of the few sectors that is

0:08:06.560 --> 0:08:10.040
<v Speaker 1>really discounting a recession in its outlook. And the longer

0:08:10.120 --> 0:08:13.600
<v Speaker 1>the macro volatilely persists, we do expect early stage and

0:08:13.720 --> 0:08:16.040
<v Speaker 1>seed to start to see that crunch that the late

0:08:16.080 --> 0:08:18.160
<v Speaker 1>stages you see right now, there is going to be

0:08:18.200 --> 0:08:22.280
<v Speaker 1>some amount of normalization of the demand. Uh well, frankly,

0:08:22.280 --> 0:08:24.920
<v Speaker 1>we in the tech industry will also have to get efficient, right.

0:08:24.960 --> 0:08:27.480
<v Speaker 1>It's not about everyone else doing more with less. We

0:08:27.520 --> 0:08:31.080
<v Speaker 1>will have to do more with less. There was just

0:08:31.160 --> 0:08:34.360
<v Speaker 1>some of our recent guests discussing the state of the

0:08:34.400 --> 0:08:38.960
<v Speaker 1>tech sector. And another week, another day, more headlines all

0:08:39.000 --> 0:08:42.000
<v Speaker 1>to do with layoffs. This Monday, Spotify six percent of

0:08:42.000 --> 0:08:44.280
<v Speaker 1>staff six dred and then just as we were getting

0:08:44.280 --> 0:08:46.920
<v Speaker 1>ready for the show, Gemini a second round of ten

0:08:46.960 --> 0:08:52.240
<v Speaker 1>percent and just keeps going un relenting. Really feels like

0:08:52.280 --> 0:08:55.320
<v Speaker 1>the numbers that are coming out ten percent smaller amount

0:08:55.320 --> 0:08:57.920
<v Speaker 1>for Gemini, of course, a sixth cent number layoff over

0:08:58.000 --> 0:08:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Spotify I means six thousand people are going to be

0:08:59.800 --> 0:09:03.560
<v Speaker 1>going this vote again. It's about a CEO trying to

0:09:03.600 --> 0:09:06.880
<v Speaker 1>own the mistakes made, basically saying his words were I

0:09:06.920 --> 0:09:08.960
<v Speaker 1>was too ambitious. They put out a note from Daniel

0:09:09.240 --> 0:09:12.160
<v Speaker 1>talking about the fact that they once again hired too

0:09:12.200 --> 0:09:15.120
<v Speaker 1>many but also invested too far perhaps and the fact

0:09:15.160 --> 0:09:17.839
<v Speaker 1>that the executive changes going on at Spotify they want

0:09:17.840 --> 0:09:20.000
<v Speaker 1>to have more efficiency. That is the watchword. There's a

0:09:20.000 --> 0:09:22.720
<v Speaker 1>debate of how much embassis you put on layoffs announced

0:09:22.880 --> 0:09:24.679
<v Speaker 1>versus laos and acted you know, we have the Challenger

0:09:24.760 --> 0:09:27.679
<v Speaker 1>Christmas data and people say, well, those are just announcements,

0:09:27.679 --> 0:09:29.480
<v Speaker 1>they're not fulfilled. And there are others out there in

0:09:29.480 --> 0:09:33.400
<v Speaker 1>the market who say there's bright spots here. And that's

0:09:33.400 --> 0:09:36.160
<v Speaker 1>why I'm delighted to say we can discuss with Spencer Green,

0:09:36.240 --> 0:09:40.320
<v Speaker 1>managing partner at t s VC, which actually is invested

0:09:40.360 --> 0:09:42.360
<v Speaker 1>in C state companies over the last twelve years. A

0:09:42.360 --> 0:09:46.079
<v Speaker 1>good example, you invested in Zoom eleven before they were

0:09:46.080 --> 0:09:49.040
<v Speaker 1>even had a product, really, you know, and that was

0:09:49.120 --> 0:09:53.040
<v Speaker 1>coming out of a financial crisis or downturn. When you

0:09:53.120 --> 0:09:56.640
<v Speaker 1>see these headlines crossing the Bloombog terminal time and time again,

0:09:56.679 --> 0:10:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Spotify six the latest as somebody who invests in companies

0:10:01.800 --> 0:10:05.199
<v Speaker 1>that actually may still be trying to hire. What's your reaction, Well,

0:10:05.240 --> 0:10:07.679
<v Speaker 1>I mean, nobody roots for a recession, but it's definitely

0:10:07.760 --> 0:10:11.000
<v Speaker 1>good for the seed stage economy. Um, the seed I

0:10:11.040 --> 0:10:13.839
<v Speaker 1>mean you heard, you know, one of your your prior

0:10:13.880 --> 0:10:16.600
<v Speaker 1>guests talking about a crunch and seed we see the opposite.

0:10:16.640 --> 0:10:20.640
<v Speaker 1>We see that brand new company formations are booming and

0:10:20.760 --> 0:10:23.319
<v Speaker 1>it's become much easier to hire staff, to hire staff,

0:10:23.320 --> 0:10:26.040
<v Speaker 1>to hire talent. Um. We had a year ago, what

0:10:26.080 --> 0:10:28.880
<v Speaker 1>I would call it double whammy that it was hard

0:10:28.880 --> 0:10:31.520
<v Speaker 1>to hire people, and also these big companies were investing

0:10:31.559 --> 0:10:34.720
<v Speaker 1>in some of these innovative projects. As they cut their investments,

0:10:34.720 --> 0:10:37.280
<v Speaker 1>they leave room for competitors and they put more talent

0:10:37.320 --> 0:10:39.120
<v Speaker 1>on the street spent. So we delight to have you

0:10:39.120 --> 0:10:41.240
<v Speaker 1>in the studio, Caroline and I while we're together in

0:10:41.280 --> 0:10:44.760
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco. It feels like the story is not just

0:10:44.800 --> 0:10:46.440
<v Speaker 1>playing out here. But the reason you hear is, I

0:10:46.440 --> 0:10:49.079
<v Speaker 1>tweeted over the weekend, hold on, is there anyone that's

0:10:49.120 --> 0:10:50.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of actively trying to go out there and hire

0:10:50.960 --> 0:10:53.559
<v Speaker 1>all these people? Because we do hear that, but we're

0:10:53.559 --> 0:10:56.199
<v Speaker 1>looking for some concrete evidence that it's true. I mean,

0:10:56.240 --> 0:10:59.000
<v Speaker 1>are you saying to your portfolio companies, Hey, now's a

0:10:59.000 --> 0:11:01.480
<v Speaker 1>great chance to get top to absolutely. And we have

0:11:01.520 --> 0:11:03.959
<v Speaker 1>portfolio companies. We have one here in San Francisco called

0:11:04.040 --> 0:11:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Zoom Transportation that runs electric school bus services for San

0:11:07.400 --> 0:11:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Francisco and for Oakland and for Los Angeles and so forth.

0:11:10.880 --> 0:11:13.280
<v Speaker 1>They're hiring. We have a recent company we funded called

0:11:13.320 --> 0:11:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Ebots that does assembly robots for electronics. They're hiring. Angle

0:11:18.440 --> 0:11:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Health is hiring. You know, lots of our portfolio companies

0:11:21.040 --> 0:11:24.160
<v Speaker 1>are hiring and a year ago it was much more

0:11:24.160 --> 0:11:27.079
<v Speaker 1>difficult for them. It's interesting, and I suppose in many

0:11:27.080 --> 0:11:30.319
<v Speaker 1>ways this is why the relentless headlines that we talk

0:11:30.360 --> 0:11:32.840
<v Speaker 1>about the hundred tens of thousands being let go at

0:11:32.880 --> 0:11:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Metro and they're like on't showing up in the federal

0:11:35.280 --> 0:11:38.880
<v Speaker 1>data because many would say anninkdotally, they're snapped up very quickly.

0:11:38.880 --> 0:11:40.720
<v Speaker 1>They get great severance and then they move on either

0:11:40.760 --> 0:11:43.280
<v Speaker 1>to be become a talent at Zoom one of your

0:11:43.320 --> 0:11:46.720
<v Speaker 1>new ventures and the transport company, or are they becoming

0:11:46.800 --> 0:11:49.800
<v Speaker 1>entrepreneurs themselves and yet to see any sort of charts

0:11:49.840 --> 0:11:52.319
<v Speaker 1>on new business formation. Are you starting to hear from

0:11:52.360 --> 0:11:55.960
<v Speaker 1>these people getting great severance packages. I know they probably

0:11:55.960 --> 0:11:58.200
<v Speaker 1>want to remain at a company and employed, but if

0:11:58.240 --> 0:11:59.760
<v Speaker 1>they are let go, are they willing to take on

0:11:59.800 --> 0:12:02.079
<v Speaker 1>a can build something? You know, It's it's a huge

0:12:02.080 --> 0:12:05.600
<v Speaker 1>point and I think it's definitely fueling a lot of

0:12:05.600 --> 0:12:08.360
<v Speaker 1>the entrepreneurial activity because what you have is, you know,

0:12:08.440 --> 0:12:10.120
<v Speaker 1>as you said, folks who maybe have a little bit

0:12:10.120 --> 0:12:12.679
<v Speaker 1>of money, they've gotten a severance, they've been doing very

0:12:12.720 --> 0:12:14.880
<v Speaker 1>well over the last few years working for these larger

0:12:14.920 --> 0:12:18.120
<v Speaker 1>companies and in some cases, you know, the Silicon Valley

0:12:18.320 --> 0:12:21.719
<v Speaker 1>spree and what's happening in San Francisco has always I mean,

0:12:22.280 --> 0:12:24.240
<v Speaker 1>so many people that you meet here they have another

0:12:24.280 --> 0:12:26.840
<v Speaker 1>startup going on on the side, right, So there are

0:12:26.840 --> 0:12:28.480
<v Speaker 1>people who are and so if you think about, like

0:12:28.520 --> 0:12:30.680
<v Speaker 1>who's going to get laid off some of these people,

0:12:30.800 --> 0:12:33.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe you were not rated as the best employees by

0:12:33.040 --> 0:12:35.760
<v Speaker 1>their big company employers because they were giving half of

0:12:35.800 --> 0:12:37.520
<v Speaker 1>their time to the company and half of the time

0:12:37.520 --> 0:12:40.120
<v Speaker 1>to their startup. So now you say, well, I've got

0:12:40.160 --> 0:12:42.360
<v Speaker 1>a little extra cash, I've got all my day free

0:12:42.360 --> 0:12:45.800
<v Speaker 1>to work on my startup. Not a bad situation. Is

0:12:45.840 --> 0:12:49.480
<v Speaker 1>there an element that you're seeing this worldwide? This is

0:12:49.600 --> 0:12:52.760
<v Speaker 1>very much where are the talent that you're currently hiring

0:12:52.920 --> 0:12:55.959
<v Speaker 1>and seeing hiring from? Do people want to remain remote?

0:12:55.960 --> 0:12:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Are you seeing some of your startups that are SF

0:12:58.000 --> 0:13:00.920
<v Speaker 1>based hiring talent for being let go in Austin Miami?

0:13:01.240 --> 0:13:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Where is this all going on at the moment? It

0:13:03.320 --> 0:13:05.080
<v Speaker 1>is much more remote than what it used to be.

0:13:05.240 --> 0:13:06.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, we we've been in you know, I've been

0:13:06.640 --> 0:13:10.640
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley since the nineties and it was definitely

0:13:10.679 --> 0:13:14.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, you'd set up a facility, everybody would come there. Um,

0:13:14.360 --> 0:13:16.680
<v Speaker 1>you even had, of course, you know, companies like Facebook

0:13:16.679 --> 0:13:19.640
<v Speaker 1>where they were relocated by their investors to Silicon Valley

0:13:19.679 --> 0:13:22.040
<v Speaker 1>because the story was, oh, yeah, we love you, but

0:13:22.160 --> 0:13:24.679
<v Speaker 1>you can't do it from where you are. It's not

0:13:24.760 --> 0:13:27.319
<v Speaker 1>so much a destination for companies. I think a lot

0:13:27.360 --> 0:13:31.079
<v Speaker 1>of companies are formed here still, and the companies that

0:13:31.120 --> 0:13:33.720
<v Speaker 1>are formed here have done so much more with remote talent,

0:13:33.920 --> 0:13:35.800
<v Speaker 1>and some of it's offshore. More of it now is

0:13:35.800 --> 0:13:39.080
<v Speaker 1>actually on shore, but outside of the area. The conversation

0:13:39.120 --> 0:13:42.600
<v Speaker 1>that Caroline keep having is that across the startup curve,

0:13:43.280 --> 0:13:46.760
<v Speaker 1>the opportunity of three is going to be seed stage,

0:13:46.800 --> 0:13:50.600
<v Speaker 1>earlier stage investments, and actually it's the growth stage funds

0:13:50.720 --> 0:13:52.600
<v Speaker 1>keeping their power to dry even though they raised all

0:13:52.640 --> 0:13:55.360
<v Speaker 1>that capital over the last two years. Is that a

0:13:55.400 --> 0:13:59.240
<v Speaker 1>fair interpretation of where the industry sits. Certainly? I think

0:13:59.280 --> 0:14:01.720
<v Speaker 1>something it ts. You see, we do seed stage primarily,

0:14:01.760 --> 0:14:03.839
<v Speaker 1>and we feel like the markets coming to us because

0:14:03.840 --> 0:14:06.320
<v Speaker 1>they need. Um. Well, the market is coming to us

0:14:06.320 --> 0:14:07.920
<v Speaker 1>in the sense that it's just hard to make money

0:14:07.920 --> 0:14:10.040
<v Speaker 1>at late stage right now. Um, if you have a

0:14:10.080 --> 0:14:12.840
<v Speaker 1>company that was overfunded at too high of evaluation a

0:14:12.880 --> 0:14:15.640
<v Speaker 1>year or two ago. Yes, you can do a down round,

0:14:15.720 --> 0:14:18.560
<v Speaker 1>you can get a better price, but then the employees

0:14:18.600 --> 0:14:21.240
<v Speaker 1>are not happy, so you lose momentum in the business.

0:14:21.320 --> 0:14:24.800
<v Speaker 1>So even though you might normalize or rationalize the pricing

0:14:24.800 --> 0:14:26.840
<v Speaker 1>of the company, that doesn't mean that it's going to

0:14:26.920 --> 0:14:28.760
<v Speaker 1>take off and be successful. So I would hate to

0:14:28.760 --> 0:14:30.760
<v Speaker 1>be writing Hunter million dollar checks right now. I think

0:14:30.760 --> 0:14:34.040
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a difficult time. We write a million dollar

0:14:34.120 --> 0:14:36.640
<v Speaker 1>checks into early companies and you think about something like Zoom.

0:14:36.640 --> 0:14:38.440
<v Speaker 1>There's a photograph which I wish I had with us,

0:14:38.480 --> 0:14:41.720
<v Speaker 1>but photograph of the of the assume founder er qu

0:14:41.920 --> 0:14:45.040
<v Speaker 1>N two engineers in our offices in two thousand eleven.

0:14:45.600 --> 0:14:48.520
<v Speaker 1>That was the company. It was himself and two engineers

0:14:48.520 --> 0:14:53.000
<v Speaker 1>a power point deck. Right, fantastic ambitions. Um, those are

0:14:53.000 --> 0:14:54.840
<v Speaker 1>the kinds of folks that we're funding right now. Tweet

0:14:54.880 --> 0:14:57.400
<v Speaker 1>ask off to the show you when you've done Absolutely yeah,

0:14:57.560 --> 0:15:00.280
<v Speaker 1>and Ginko Bio Works and and Cata they I haven't

0:15:00.280 --> 0:15:03.560
<v Speaker 1>been a one trick plony TSPC managing partner. He's a

0:15:03.600 --> 0:15:06.040
<v Speaker 1>coal spencer green. What joy having him right here in

0:15:06.080 --> 0:15:07.760
<v Speaker 1>the studio with us. Nice tweeting from you had to

0:15:07.760 --> 0:15:10.480
<v Speaker 1>get him on as well, meanwhile, coming up Apple's headset,

0:15:10.760 --> 0:15:13.720
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be controlled by your hands, by your eyes.

0:15:14.080 --> 0:15:16.240
<v Speaker 1>More details on the mixed reality device next, and it's

0:15:16.280 --> 0:15:28.160
<v Speaker 1>price point. Li's a Blien Bug New Day, New Week

0:15:28.160 --> 0:15:30.040
<v Speaker 1>News scoop for one Mark Gum and let's talk about

0:15:30.040 --> 0:15:32.880
<v Speaker 1>new details that are out about the highly anticipated three

0:15:33.000 --> 0:15:36.440
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollar mixed reality headset by Apple. Of course, it's

0:15:36.440 --> 0:15:39.520
<v Speaker 1>according to sources, which boast an eye and a hand

0:15:39.520 --> 0:15:42.760
<v Speaker 1>tracking system that could set the technology pretty much apart

0:15:42.760 --> 0:15:45.440
<v Speaker 1>from rivals. Right, Mark, you've got this new story and

0:15:45.480 --> 0:15:47.840
<v Speaker 1>just tell us about how this one's going to be

0:15:47.840 --> 0:15:50.560
<v Speaker 1>different from the other ones in the market. Yeah, that's

0:15:50.560 --> 0:15:53.040
<v Speaker 1>exactly right. So this is Apple's next big thing. They've

0:15:53.040 --> 0:15:55.120
<v Speaker 1>been working on it for north of seven years. At

0:15:55.120 --> 0:15:59.440
<v Speaker 1>this point. They have well over engineers on the project.

0:15:59.520 --> 0:16:01.480
<v Speaker 1>They're getting ready to unveil it in the next couple

0:16:01.520 --> 0:16:04.040
<v Speaker 1>of months and put on sale later this year. The

0:16:04.080 --> 0:16:06.400
<v Speaker 1>factories are going to start churning them out starting at

0:16:06.400 --> 0:16:08.800
<v Speaker 1>the end of next month in China. But the eye

0:16:08.880 --> 0:16:11.720
<v Speaker 1>in hand control, right, some devices on the market area

0:16:11.720 --> 0:16:14.320
<v Speaker 1>now already can read your eyes and have hand control,

0:16:14.800 --> 0:16:17.400
<v Speaker 1>but with Apple's device, it's the way they work together.

0:16:17.520 --> 0:16:20.000
<v Speaker 1>That makes it so special. If you remember the touch

0:16:20.040 --> 0:16:22.880
<v Speaker 1>screen on the first iPhone, that was a big differentiator,

0:16:22.920 --> 0:16:25.240
<v Speaker 1>the crown on the watch. For this, it's eye in

0:16:25.280 --> 0:16:27.040
<v Speaker 1>hand control. So let me give you an example. The

0:16:27.080 --> 0:16:29.120
<v Speaker 1>way you control the device is you can just look

0:16:29.160 --> 0:16:31.560
<v Speaker 1>at something, whether you want to launch an app, whether

0:16:31.600 --> 0:16:34.400
<v Speaker 1>you want to swipe through a list or toggle a setting. Right,

0:16:34.680 --> 0:16:37.840
<v Speaker 1>you look at it and then you pinch your thumb

0:16:37.840 --> 0:16:40.760
<v Speaker 1>and your index finger together when you're looking at it

0:16:40.800 --> 0:16:43.840
<v Speaker 1>to launch it. Just like on a touch screen you

0:16:43.880 --> 0:16:46.280
<v Speaker 1>tap what you want or on a mouse, you point

0:16:46.320 --> 0:16:48.520
<v Speaker 1>the cursor toward it and then you click. This is

0:16:48.560 --> 0:16:53.520
<v Speaker 1>you look and tap your fingers together. So pretty nifty.

0:16:53.960 --> 0:16:55.280
<v Speaker 1>I guess. The question is how do we get to

0:16:55.320 --> 0:16:57.200
<v Speaker 1>a three thousands of the price point? Right? How does

0:16:57.240 --> 0:17:01.360
<v Speaker 1>this headset differentiates itself from metas quest? The other real

0:17:01.400 --> 0:17:03.200
<v Speaker 1>question I have to you is like, as an iPhone

0:17:03.280 --> 0:17:06.760
<v Speaker 1>user and thinking about emoji or emojis and and emojis

0:17:06.800 --> 0:17:08.640
<v Speaker 1>right where you use the camera to kind of map

0:17:08.680 --> 0:17:11.320
<v Speaker 1>your face and interact with that technology. Is this the

0:17:11.359 --> 0:17:14.639
<v Speaker 1>kind of extension of that. Yes. So in terms of

0:17:14.640 --> 0:17:17.280
<v Speaker 1>the price point, well, it has fourteen cameras, right, you

0:17:17.359 --> 0:17:20.000
<v Speaker 1>have a bunch of cameras outside. You need cameras that

0:17:20.000 --> 0:17:21.760
<v Speaker 1>can look forward, you need cameras that can look up,

0:17:21.760 --> 0:17:24.520
<v Speaker 1>and need cameras that could look down, right down to

0:17:24.560 --> 0:17:26.680
<v Speaker 1>see what your legs look like and what your body

0:17:26.760 --> 0:17:28.960
<v Speaker 1>looks like in order to recreate what you look like

0:17:29.000 --> 0:17:32.600
<v Speaker 1>in virtual reality. For that feature you alluded to in FaceTime,

0:17:32.800 --> 0:17:35.159
<v Speaker 1>there's also cameras and sensors inside the device to be

0:17:35.200 --> 0:17:37.800
<v Speaker 1>able to read where your eyes are looking at. In addition,

0:17:37.840 --> 0:17:40.160
<v Speaker 1>there's two four K displays, right you know the four

0:17:40.240 --> 0:17:42.680
<v Speaker 1>KTV you have maybe in your living room. Well, there's

0:17:42.720 --> 0:17:46.520
<v Speaker 1>two of them, many ones inside of the headset to

0:17:46.720 --> 0:17:50.200
<v Speaker 1>perform virtual reality. The cameras also, in addition to being

0:17:50.240 --> 0:17:52.920
<v Speaker 1>sensors to see what everything looks like, it's a way

0:17:52.960 --> 0:17:56.600
<v Speaker 1>to create augmented reality. Right. Are usually uses clear lenses,

0:17:56.640 --> 0:17:58.679
<v Speaker 1>but in this case it's going to use cameras to

0:17:58.760 --> 0:18:01.119
<v Speaker 1>create sort of a fake of a r VR mixed

0:18:01.160 --> 0:18:05.200
<v Speaker 1>reality reality effect. It's a pretty cool and practice, I'm told.

0:18:05.440 --> 0:18:07.760
<v Speaker 1>The other interesting thing to your point is you're going

0:18:07.800 --> 0:18:09.520
<v Speaker 1>to be able to replicate a lot of the features

0:18:09.520 --> 0:18:12.280
<v Speaker 1>of an iPad on here, right, So you'll get Safari

0:18:12.320 --> 0:18:16.960
<v Speaker 1>mail maps, calendar, health tracking, even there's also a feature

0:18:16.960 --> 0:18:18.640
<v Speaker 1>where you can hook it up to your Mac and

0:18:18.800 --> 0:18:21.679
<v Speaker 1>you sort of can control your Mac and then you

0:18:21.720 --> 0:18:23.919
<v Speaker 1>can see what your Mac stream looks like in virtual

0:18:23.960 --> 0:18:28.640
<v Speaker 1>reality while using your keyboard, mouse, and track pad. Mark

0:18:28.840 --> 0:18:31.720
<v Speaker 1>very briefly, how much is this moving the needle for

0:18:31.800 --> 0:18:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Apple valuation perspective from an analyst perspective to people ultimately

0:18:36.000 --> 0:18:38.520
<v Speaker 1>think this is gonna be a game change for them.

0:18:38.560 --> 0:18:40.199
<v Speaker 1>So in year one they want to sell about a

0:18:40.200 --> 0:18:43.399
<v Speaker 1>million units at three thousand dollars, right, and I believe

0:18:43.480 --> 0:18:46.200
<v Speaker 1>that's about three billion dollars. So in terms of overall

0:18:46.240 --> 0:18:48.679
<v Speaker 1>revenue for Apple, it's not going to move the needle,

0:18:49.119 --> 0:18:51.760
<v Speaker 1>uh in the short term, But long term this could

0:18:51.760 --> 0:18:54.680
<v Speaker 1>be a multi hundred billion dollar market and Apple, given

0:18:54.680 --> 0:18:57.040
<v Speaker 1>the layoffs at Meta and the hardware changes that Google

0:18:57.040 --> 0:18:59.320
<v Speaker 1>and Amazon as well, they seem to have a clear

0:18:59.400 --> 0:19:02.600
<v Speaker 1>runway not only VR but other hardware products in the future.

0:19:03.240 --> 0:19:05.959
<v Speaker 1>Right Bloomberg s Mark German another day, another big scoop,

0:19:06.280 --> 0:19:18.159
<v Speaker 1>As Carrow said, welcome back to Bloomberg Technology right here

0:19:18.160 --> 0:19:20.240
<v Speaker 1>from San Francisco and Caroline High and I med lovel

0:19:20.359 --> 0:19:22.800
<v Speaker 1>and it is a pleasure to have you back out West,

0:19:22.840 --> 0:19:25.600
<v Speaker 1>back in the Bay Area. We've got to talk about

0:19:25.600 --> 0:19:27.600
<v Speaker 1>social media, and we've got to talk about regulation. Has

0:19:27.600 --> 0:19:29.399
<v Speaker 1>been a big theme in the show. For a number

0:19:29.440 --> 0:19:32.560
<v Speaker 1>of days now. The federal government and several states have

0:19:32.680 --> 0:19:37.080
<v Speaker 1>raised cybersecurity concerns as you know carry around Chinese own TikTok,

0:19:37.320 --> 0:19:40.119
<v Speaker 1>and as we reported last week, dozens of U S

0:19:40.119 --> 0:19:43.840
<v Speaker 1>schools and US universities had moved to ban the app

0:19:43.880 --> 0:19:47.400
<v Speaker 1>from campuses, hoping to prevent it from spying on students,

0:19:47.440 --> 0:19:52.520
<v Speaker 1>asserting the Chinese government could access the private information of

0:19:52.560 --> 0:19:55.240
<v Speaker 1>its users. Let's bring in Mickey Bowland to talk about

0:19:55.240 --> 0:19:59.320
<v Speaker 1>the potential risks associated with the Actually is global cybersecurity

0:19:59.440 --> 0:20:04.160
<v Speaker 1>architect and security evangelist over at Checkpoint Software Technologies, which

0:20:04.200 --> 0:20:08.440
<v Speaker 1>is a cybersecurity solutions provider. I mean you heard the backstory.

0:20:08.880 --> 0:20:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Caroline and I have been trying to make sense of

0:20:10.880 --> 0:20:14.480
<v Speaker 1>this for a number of days now. Campuses moved to

0:20:14.560 --> 0:20:17.720
<v Speaker 1>remove the ability to access TikTok while on campus through

0:20:17.720 --> 0:20:21.160
<v Speaker 1>the WiFi network. What we're hearing from the users is

0:20:21.520 --> 0:20:25.440
<v Speaker 1>they don't understand the risk that is being warned about here.

0:20:25.960 --> 0:20:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Is there a risk? Yes? Yes. Um. First, I want

0:20:29.800 --> 0:20:32.240
<v Speaker 1>to say thank you so much for having me in checkpoint.

0:20:32.320 --> 0:20:35.960
<v Speaker 1>We believe that everyone deserves the best cybersecurity. So I

0:20:36.000 --> 0:20:39.440
<v Speaker 1>will say this for for end users that are unsuspecting

0:20:39.600 --> 0:20:42.720
<v Speaker 1>or really don't understand the risk, Yes there is risk,

0:20:43.040 --> 0:20:48.160
<v Speaker 1>and this is why we're seeing organizations come together, so agencies,

0:20:48.400 --> 0:20:54.640
<v Speaker 1>enterprise UM like nonprofits for actually doing a joint responsibility

0:20:54.680 --> 0:20:57.560
<v Speaker 1>for risk. Right, So we need to approach risk. Is

0:20:57.600 --> 0:21:00.399
<v Speaker 1>that we have privacy and we have security. We have

0:21:00.520 --> 0:21:04.679
<v Speaker 1>privacy for data, for protected data, for privacy and end

0:21:04.760 --> 0:21:09.280
<v Speaker 1>user data endpoints, also for corporate assets. We also have

0:21:09.280 --> 0:21:12.360
<v Speaker 1>to protect our network. So people are writing the networks

0:21:12.359 --> 0:21:16.280
<v Speaker 1>to get to these applications, and our networks are vulnerable

0:21:16.320 --> 0:21:20.200
<v Speaker 1>to attack by militia's actors and malicious spread of malware.

0:21:20.840 --> 0:21:23.679
<v Speaker 1>Uh so, and then we have corporate assets and university

0:21:23.720 --> 0:21:26.280
<v Speaker 1>assets in this case to protect. So it is a

0:21:26.359 --> 0:21:29.840
<v Speaker 1>joint responsibility, and we do need to help students understand

0:21:30.280 --> 0:21:34.840
<v Speaker 1>the risk and and really educate everyone. Mickey, going back

0:21:34.840 --> 0:21:40.720
<v Speaker 1>to basics, the argument is that ultimately uh personnel in

0:21:40.840 --> 0:21:45.639
<v Speaker 1>mainland China might be able to access the personal data

0:21:45.880 --> 0:21:49.080
<v Speaker 1>of TikTok users in the United States. The proposed solution

0:21:49.640 --> 0:21:53.280
<v Speaker 1>from TikTok is to house the data of US users

0:21:53.359 --> 0:21:57.560
<v Speaker 1>on Oracle servers based here in the United States. Is

0:21:57.600 --> 0:22:01.960
<v Speaker 1>that an acceptable mitigation of risk for industry professionals like yourself?

0:22:03.440 --> 0:22:06.119
<v Speaker 1>I think I I hate to speculate about that, but

0:22:06.160 --> 0:22:09.520
<v Speaker 1>I will tell you that our Checkpoint research we actually

0:22:09.520 --> 0:22:13.840
<v Speaker 1>did extensive testing. We're super curious back in about was

0:22:13.920 --> 0:22:19.040
<v Speaker 1>TikTok Um. Were they delivering consistent policy and security privacy

0:22:19.080 --> 0:22:22.679
<v Speaker 1>and security rather And we did find several vulnerabilities. Our

0:22:22.800 --> 0:22:27.520
<v Speaker 1>research team found cross site scripting for their ads um.

0:22:27.560 --> 0:22:31.240
<v Speaker 1>We actually found a way to kind of circumvent um

0:22:31.359 --> 0:22:34.959
<v Speaker 1>registration using a mobile device and use SMS, you know,

0:22:35.040 --> 0:22:40.280
<v Speaker 1>spoofing or registration. Uh, there was API vulnerability. So I

0:22:40.320 --> 0:22:43.160
<v Speaker 1>guess ultimately what I'm saying is we need to demand

0:22:43.359 --> 0:22:48.639
<v Speaker 1>of organizations that are offering the social media applications and

0:22:48.720 --> 0:22:52.439
<v Speaker 1>other applications, primarily for mobile devices, that they actually have

0:22:52.480 --> 0:22:57.400
<v Speaker 1>a consistent security and privacy policy that we can actually address.

0:22:58.760 --> 0:23:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Can compare TikTok to other viraly growing social media companies

0:23:04.080 --> 0:23:08.080
<v Speaker 1>of old? How many vulnerabilities does it have visaving competitors?

0:23:09.560 --> 0:23:11.760
<v Speaker 1>I really, I mean across the board. I'd refer to

0:23:11.800 --> 0:23:15.840
<v Speaker 1>our research team for that. I think that they TikTok

0:23:15.960 --> 0:23:20.080
<v Speaker 1>to their um to justice to TikTok, they actually did

0:23:20.200 --> 0:23:24.440
<v Speaker 1>fix the vulnerabilities that Checkpoint Research team presented to them,

0:23:24.520 --> 0:23:28.000
<v Speaker 1>and indeed we work together in one to help them

0:23:28.359 --> 0:23:32.720
<v Speaker 1>fantast these vulnerabilities. I think that from uh, I guess

0:23:32.760 --> 0:23:35.960
<v Speaker 1>just ultimately what we understand is from an attack surface,

0:23:36.320 --> 0:23:40.639
<v Speaker 1>these applications are going viral. I think, TikTok, Now I

0:23:40.720 --> 0:23:43.240
<v Speaker 1>just install it again to test this. Over a billion

0:23:43.280 --> 0:23:46.680
<v Speaker 1>installs or downloads, there's a u S I read there's

0:23:46.760 --> 0:23:51.040
<v Speaker 1>now currently over a hundred million active users and globally

0:23:51.080 --> 0:23:53.800
<v Speaker 1>it's billions of people. Right, So I think that we

0:23:53.960 --> 0:23:58.520
<v Speaker 1>have to uh think that these these um social media

0:23:58.600 --> 0:24:01.359
<v Speaker 1>platforms are going to be like a huge tasty attack

0:24:01.440 --> 0:24:05.560
<v Speaker 1>surface for malicious actors. Uh. We also have to take

0:24:05.600 --> 0:24:09.760
<v Speaker 1>responsibility for our own personal data. When Mickey told to

0:24:09.840 --> 0:24:12.240
<v Speaker 1>us about that, because you say you're a self proclaimed

0:24:12.240 --> 0:24:15.480
<v Speaker 1>global cybersecurity warrior, be a warrior for us. If I

0:24:15.480 --> 0:24:17.080
<v Speaker 1>can't leave it up to TikTok, what do I do

0:24:17.119 --> 0:24:20.080
<v Speaker 1>to prospect myself? Thank you so much. I am a

0:24:20.080 --> 0:24:22.159
<v Speaker 1>warrior and I wish everyone would be. And we were

0:24:22.200 --> 0:24:24.680
<v Speaker 1>asking more people to join the way your vandreg and

0:24:24.760 --> 0:24:26.960
<v Speaker 1>souff please do. But what you need to do. First

0:24:27.000 --> 0:24:31.040
<v Speaker 1>of all, when you download anyone, I mean from anyone.

0:24:31.119 --> 0:24:33.280
<v Speaker 1>If you go to the app store and you download

0:24:33.359 --> 0:24:36.800
<v Speaker 1>social media applications, go read the details. What is their

0:24:36.800 --> 0:24:40.240
<v Speaker 1>security policy and their privacy policy? What kind of data

0:24:40.240 --> 0:24:43.280
<v Speaker 1>are they collecting on you? And then are you actively

0:24:43.440 --> 0:24:46.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, looking at the permissions that you're granting to

0:24:46.800 --> 0:24:49.800
<v Speaker 1>this application when you install it. If it's like click click,

0:24:49.920 --> 0:24:52.880
<v Speaker 1>test you know, touch, touch, and I just gave access

0:24:52.920 --> 0:24:55.440
<v Speaker 1>to my phone, my camera which you know you're doing

0:24:55.520 --> 0:25:00.880
<v Speaker 1>videos on TikTok and other applications. Um, your camera, you're microphone,

0:25:01.000 --> 0:25:04.520
<v Speaker 1>your you know location, all your contexts, I think your calendar.

0:25:04.920 --> 0:25:08.720
<v Speaker 1>This is probably too much information to share. Then you

0:25:08.800 --> 0:25:12.280
<v Speaker 1>also have the need to redefined bying print. What are

0:25:12.280 --> 0:25:15.480
<v Speaker 1>they saying they're doing with analytics that are that are

0:25:15.520 --> 0:25:18.800
<v Speaker 1>being collected from you? And then who do you trust? Right?

0:25:18.880 --> 0:25:22.160
<v Speaker 1>Ultimately you have to have a trust in the application,

0:25:22.960 --> 0:25:26.639
<v Speaker 1>any software key and be exploited. They're never going to

0:25:26.720 --> 0:25:31.280
<v Speaker 1>be perfect. Mickey Boland, keep worrying and being a work

0:25:31.680 --> 0:25:35.040
<v Speaker 1>checkpoint global cubersecurity architect. Great tous in time with you. Meanwhile,

0:25:35.320 --> 0:25:37.639
<v Speaker 1>well let's head down to DC now because we're going

0:25:37.720 --> 0:25:40.000
<v Speaker 1>to talk much more about regulation of social media the

0:25:40.080 --> 0:25:42.439
<v Speaker 1>US Supreme Court in this instance, because actually ask the

0:25:42.440 --> 0:25:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Biden administration for input on Florida on Texas laws that

0:25:45.920 --> 0:25:50.160
<v Speaker 1>could sharply restrict the editorial discretion of social media platforms.

0:25:50.359 --> 0:25:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Greenberg's Greg Store has the latest for us on basically

0:25:53.800 --> 0:25:57.280
<v Speaker 1>censorship concerns on either side of the aisle. Greg, just

0:25:57.320 --> 0:26:00.840
<v Speaker 1>talk us through what in fact the Intreeen Court wants

0:26:00.840 --> 0:26:04.400
<v Speaker 1>to hear from the administration. Well, the Supreme Court wants

0:26:04.440 --> 0:26:07.480
<v Speaker 1>to hear advice on should we take up these appeals.

0:26:07.520 --> 0:26:10.040
<v Speaker 1>There are appeals from both sides. There are two cases,

0:26:10.320 --> 0:26:14.280
<v Speaker 1>one involving Texas, one involving Florida, And basically these are

0:26:14.400 --> 0:26:17.840
<v Speaker 1>laws where the conservative governors and the conservative lawmakers of

0:26:17.840 --> 0:26:21.600
<v Speaker 1>those states are saying, we're worried that social media companies

0:26:21.640 --> 0:26:26.080
<v Speaker 1>are discriminating against conservatives, silence and conservative voices. So we're

0:26:26.080 --> 0:26:29.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna get in there and we're gonna oversee their content,

0:26:29.920 --> 0:26:34.240
<v Speaker 1>their content management, uh, and uh say, you know, impose

0:26:34.280 --> 0:26:36.879
<v Speaker 1>a lot of new requirements on them. And the social

0:26:36.920 --> 0:26:40.440
<v Speaker 1>media companies are saying that's a violation of our First

0:26:40.480 --> 0:26:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Amendment rights. Greg look at your reporting on the Bloomberg terminal.

0:26:45.160 --> 0:26:48.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, you have this Texas set of laws and

0:26:48.560 --> 0:26:52.480
<v Speaker 1>the Florida set of laws. The Texas set seemed to

0:26:52.480 --> 0:26:54.840
<v Speaker 1>be the most sort of sweeping in terms of the

0:26:54.880 --> 0:26:58.560
<v Speaker 1>actions they take against social media platforms. Tell us what

0:26:58.680 --> 0:27:01.639
<v Speaker 1>they're based on. What do they quiet social media platforms

0:27:01.680 --> 0:27:05.800
<v Speaker 1>to do? Sure, the biggest provision in the Texas law

0:27:05.840 --> 0:27:09.159
<v Speaker 1>would say that you that social media companies can't discriminate

0:27:09.200 --> 0:27:11.520
<v Speaker 1>on the basis of viewpoint. Now, there are a few

0:27:11.520 --> 0:27:15.000
<v Speaker 1>exceptions to that, but basically the idea is, you can't

0:27:15.000 --> 0:27:17.520
<v Speaker 1>take something down if it's coming from a conservative voice,

0:27:17.520 --> 0:27:20.359
<v Speaker 1>if you wouldn't take something uh down coming from a

0:27:20.359 --> 0:27:23.879
<v Speaker 1>liberal voice, And the social media companies say, hey, that

0:27:23.880 --> 0:27:26.359
<v Speaker 1>that might make it impossible for us to stop bullying,

0:27:26.600 --> 0:27:31.000
<v Speaker 1>to stop spam things like that. Uh. There are a

0:27:31.040 --> 0:27:35.760
<v Speaker 1>number of other provisions involving disclosure and operational requirements as well,

0:27:36.200 --> 0:27:39.720
<v Speaker 1>and the Florida law has a whole series of particular

0:27:39.800 --> 0:27:42.199
<v Speaker 1>requirements that are in some cases the same, in some

0:27:42.240 --> 0:27:45.600
<v Speaker 1>cases different. One of the ones that a federal appeals

0:27:45.640 --> 0:27:49.359
<v Speaker 1>court struck down or at least blocked, said that social

0:27:49.400 --> 0:27:52.760
<v Speaker 1>media companies have to provide a thorough rationale every time

0:27:52.800 --> 0:27:57.439
<v Speaker 1>they make some sort of content management decision. And to

0:27:57.560 --> 0:28:00.720
<v Speaker 1>that end, thus far these laws have been to put

0:28:00.720 --> 0:28:02.879
<v Speaker 1>on ice. Shall we say, Greg, what's the next step?

0:28:03.000 --> 0:28:06.840
<v Speaker 1>When do we hear ultimately from the Supreme Court? Yeah,

0:28:06.840 --> 0:28:10.440
<v Speaker 1>they are on ice. Although a federal appeals court upheld

0:28:10.480 --> 0:28:13.400
<v Speaker 1>the Texas laws, of the Supreme Court turns away that case,

0:28:13.520 --> 0:28:15.800
<v Speaker 1>that law will go into effect. So right now we

0:28:15.880 --> 0:28:18.399
<v Speaker 1>wait for the Biden administration and will probably take several

0:28:18.440 --> 0:28:21.960
<v Speaker 1>months to say, you know what it thinks the Supreme

0:28:22.000 --> 0:28:25.159
<v Speaker 1>Court should do, and then probably possibly at the end

0:28:25.200 --> 0:28:27.720
<v Speaker 1>of the Court's term in June, but more likely I

0:28:27.760 --> 0:28:30.159
<v Speaker 1>would say when they come back in October for the

0:28:30.200 --> 0:28:32.239
<v Speaker 1>next term, the Court will tell us whether it's going

0:28:32.280 --> 0:28:35.520
<v Speaker 1>to take up these cases. Because of the widespread impact

0:28:35.560 --> 0:28:39.000
<v Speaker 1>because of the lower court divide over these issues, there's

0:28:39.040 --> 0:28:40.800
<v Speaker 1>a pretty good chance the Court will take it up,

0:28:40.800 --> 0:28:44.440
<v Speaker 1>and then then those will be huge cases for next term. Greg,

0:28:44.480 --> 0:28:46.680
<v Speaker 1>still a lot of work cut out, it would seem.

0:28:46.680 --> 0:28:48.880
<v Speaker 1>We thank you for your time, and we'll continue this

0:28:49.040 --> 0:28:51.800
<v Speaker 1>really important conversation later this week. We're gonna be having

0:28:51.840 --> 0:28:54.600
<v Speaker 1>none of them. The SEC Commissioner Brendon car all about

0:28:54.640 --> 0:28:57.000
<v Speaker 1>of course, I focus on TikTok, I focus on social

0:28:57.040 --> 0:29:00.320
<v Speaker 1>media hire in the United States. That's Thursday, well and

0:29:00.440 --> 0:29:03.880
<v Speaker 1>coming up, how one startup managed to raise funds and

0:29:03.920 --> 0:29:08.120
<v Speaker 1>secure a multi billion dollar valuation, spice and down rounds

0:29:08.160 --> 0:29:11.440
<v Speaker 1>to spite a tough market for startups over the last year.

0:29:11.800 --> 0:29:24.320
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg. Welcome back to blom Meg Technology and

0:29:24.360 --> 0:29:26.719
<v Speaker 1>we do so much in terms of public market coverage.

0:29:26.720 --> 0:29:28.800
<v Speaker 1>But ed, you're so smart giving us up to speed

0:29:28.800 --> 0:29:31.040
<v Speaker 1>in the world of VC venture capital startups. Get us

0:29:31.120 --> 0:29:33.480
<v Speaker 1>up with what's happening this weekend? Yeah, I think talking tech,

0:29:33.520 --> 0:29:35.240
<v Speaker 1>we need to focus on what's happening in that part

0:29:35.240 --> 0:29:37.480
<v Speaker 1>of the world because there are so many headlines. Starting

0:29:37.480 --> 0:29:40.880
<v Speaker 1>with Sequoias Regional arm in South and Southeast Asia. It's

0:29:40.880 --> 0:29:43.680
<v Speaker 1>weighing up special audits of several of its investments in

0:29:43.680 --> 0:29:48.400
<v Speaker 1>the region following allegations of financial irregularity some portfolio companies,

0:29:48.520 --> 0:29:52.400
<v Speaker 1>including ze Lingo and go Mechanic. Over In Europe, Highland

0:29:52.440 --> 0:29:55.200
<v Speaker 1>has raised a new one billion euro fund that aims

0:29:55.240 --> 0:29:59.120
<v Speaker 1>to invest in private software and consumer internet companies in Europe.

0:29:59.120 --> 0:30:01.960
<v Speaker 1>The firm going to focus on growth stage companies. Interesting

0:30:02.200 --> 0:30:04.160
<v Speaker 1>that they've raised and closed that in this environment, and

0:30:04.200 --> 0:30:07.760
<v Speaker 1>finally fintech to HR outfit. Deal says it's reached two

0:30:08.640 --> 0:30:11.560
<v Speaker 1>million dollars in annual recurring revenue by the end of

0:30:11.600 --> 0:30:13.520
<v Speaker 1>two but that was a jump of more than four

0:30:14.640 --> 0:30:18.200
<v Speaker 1>from the end of the company also confirming its valuation

0:30:18.440 --> 0:30:22.840
<v Speaker 1>has reached twelve billion US dollars. Carr. Fascinating that we're

0:30:22.840 --> 0:30:25.840
<v Speaker 1>getting more focused on valuations where they're being held out

0:30:25.880 --> 0:30:28.719
<v Speaker 1>after the funding from last year. Let's talk about it

0:30:28.840 --> 0:30:31.880
<v Speaker 1>with the co founder, the CEO, Alex Boss. Alex is

0:30:31.880 --> 0:30:33.720
<v Speaker 1>great to have you on from Deal and I was

0:30:33.760 --> 0:30:36.880
<v Speaker 1>on the website everything you need to scale a global team.

0:30:36.920 --> 0:30:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Just talk to us about the need for your services

0:30:39.720 --> 0:30:42.960
<v Speaker 1>in an environment where unfortunately talking more about layoffs than scaling.

0:30:43.280 --> 0:30:47.360
<v Speaker 1>How is your HR offering being well scaled in and

0:30:47.360 --> 0:30:50.520
<v Speaker 1>of itself by other companies right now? Of course? Well,

0:30:50.560 --> 0:30:52.440
<v Speaker 1>first of all, Caroline, thank you so much for having

0:30:52.480 --> 0:30:55.480
<v Speaker 1>you today. Are very excited to be here. Um. You know,

0:30:55.600 --> 0:30:59.200
<v Speaker 1>Deal started as a company that enables you to hire globinly,

0:30:59.200 --> 0:31:01.400
<v Speaker 1>so let's say too more. Bloomberg wants to hire someone

0:31:01.440 --> 0:31:03.640
<v Speaker 1>in South Korea and they don't have the structure to

0:31:03.640 --> 0:31:05.800
<v Speaker 1>do that just yet. There we'll enable you to hire

0:31:05.880 --> 0:31:08.080
<v Speaker 1>someone as an employee there and give them the best

0:31:08.080 --> 0:31:11.320
<v Speaker 1>benefits in a day. As the company kind of grew,

0:31:11.360 --> 0:31:13.160
<v Speaker 1>we realized that we could do so much more right.

0:31:13.360 --> 0:31:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Expanding globally as a company is so key and right

0:31:16.520 --> 0:31:18.720
<v Speaker 1>now with the latest readings, we basically become the full

0:31:18.720 --> 0:31:22.120
<v Speaker 1>sta HR solution for you to really go global. I'm

0:31:22.120 --> 0:31:25.760
<v Speaker 1>looking at the global companies cabin Klein, Nike, they're all

0:31:25.840 --> 0:31:29.040
<v Speaker 1>US space, but we've also got private twenty one Shopify

0:31:29.160 --> 0:31:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Canadian business. Where for you do you look to increase

0:31:33.360 --> 0:31:37.400
<v Speaker 1>your own footprint and and econ economy the worldwide is

0:31:37.520 --> 0:31:40.440
<v Speaker 1>slowing down right now? Yeah, I mean, you know, we've

0:31:40.440 --> 0:31:43.320
<v Speaker 1>always been genuine agnostic when it comes to regions, right

0:31:43.320 --> 0:31:45.240
<v Speaker 1>we want to have the best companies obviously, I think

0:31:45.360 --> 0:31:48.280
<v Speaker 1>over fifty of our business comes from the United States,

0:31:48.640 --> 0:31:51.000
<v Speaker 1>and then you know, we really have a global footprint

0:31:51.040 --> 0:31:53.560
<v Speaker 1>and heads of countries in every country actually and really

0:31:53.560 --> 0:31:55.840
<v Speaker 1>has a global business, you know, being European, myself and

0:31:55.880 --> 0:31:58.760
<v Speaker 1>my co founder being Chinese, right, we really wanted to

0:31:58.840 --> 0:32:00.840
<v Speaker 1>be able to cover most of the companies from the

0:32:00.840 --> 0:32:02.360
<v Speaker 1>get go, and that's what we've been able to do

0:32:02.400 --> 0:32:04.240
<v Speaker 1>so far. So to do you have us companies, but

0:32:04.280 --> 0:32:06.040
<v Speaker 1>you have companies from all over the world and across

0:32:06.080 --> 0:32:09.440
<v Speaker 1>all segments using them. Alex, I want to go back

0:32:09.480 --> 0:32:11.440
<v Speaker 1>some of the numbers and the timeline of this. There

0:32:11.440 --> 0:32:15.640
<v Speaker 1>are reports last May they were raising funds. You close

0:32:15.760 --> 0:32:18.600
<v Speaker 1>that deal, I believe over the summer you've announced today

0:32:18.720 --> 0:32:21.920
<v Speaker 1>evaluation of twelve billion dollars. That is completely at odds

0:32:22.280 --> 0:32:24.600
<v Speaker 1>with what Caroline and I are hearing every day on

0:32:24.640 --> 0:32:27.960
<v Speaker 1>this show, founders finding it hard to raise money down

0:32:28.080 --> 0:32:31.920
<v Speaker 1>rounds being more common, the evaluations growing. Was it a

0:32:31.920 --> 0:32:35.600
<v Speaker 1>difficult environment for you? I mean, you know for us

0:32:35.640 --> 0:32:38.720
<v Speaker 1>we closed that around in June. Really they do was

0:32:38.760 --> 0:32:40.920
<v Speaker 1>not to raise money for the capital, but you know,

0:32:40.960 --> 0:32:42.920
<v Speaker 1>we get to to work with the team at Emerson,

0:32:43.120 --> 0:32:45.080
<v Speaker 1>which is very impact driven, right, and that's what we

0:32:45.120 --> 0:32:47.440
<v Speaker 1>wanted to do a deal. The mission of the companies

0:32:47.440 --> 0:32:49.360
<v Speaker 1>to have hundreds of millions of people get to work

0:32:49.400 --> 0:32:51.200
<v Speaker 1>for the best companies in the world. So it was

0:32:51.280 --> 0:32:53.320
<v Speaker 1>less about the money, but more about the people. And

0:32:53.400 --> 0:32:55.240
<v Speaker 1>that's why the valuation was a bit easier to get to.

0:32:55.720 --> 0:32:57.520
<v Speaker 1>And we've been really focused on the business itself. You know,

0:32:57.520 --> 0:33:00.360
<v Speaker 1>we announced that from September we actually started being being

0:33:00.400 --> 0:33:02.760
<v Speaker 1>a bit depositive, so we have a lot of money

0:33:02.800 --> 0:33:05.120
<v Speaker 1>in the bank, and really it was about getting to

0:33:05.160 --> 0:33:06.920
<v Speaker 1>the right number for us and bringing the right people.

0:33:07.680 --> 0:33:10.400
<v Speaker 1>That's interesting, So you're saying essentially that you know, from

0:33:10.560 --> 0:33:14.360
<v Speaker 1>very recently you started to be profitable. The other financial

0:33:14.400 --> 0:33:17.600
<v Speaker 1>that you disclosed is that your and your average revenue

0:33:17.840 --> 0:33:21.000
<v Speaker 1>growth essentially jump from at the end of twenty one

0:33:21.080 --> 0:33:24.560
<v Speaker 1>to the end of last year. Are you worried now

0:33:24.560 --> 0:33:30.240
<v Speaker 1>that when you see layoffs freezing of expenditures in this environment,

0:33:30.360 --> 0:33:32.800
<v Speaker 1>that you might see a delayed response from your customer

0:33:32.840 --> 0:33:35.960
<v Speaker 1>base as well. Well, not exactly, because the way we

0:33:36.040 --> 0:33:38.080
<v Speaker 1>think about it is there's kind of two trends that

0:33:38.120 --> 0:33:40.960
<v Speaker 1>are happening. The first one is more and more companies

0:33:41.000 --> 0:33:43.280
<v Speaker 1>are cutting custs on software and they want to consolidate

0:33:43.280 --> 0:33:45.920
<v Speaker 1>their HR infrastructure, and we've this new product that we

0:33:45.960 --> 0:33:48.480
<v Speaker 1>are on today will help them by being the HR

0:33:48.480 --> 0:33:51.600
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure and the Falce life solution, not just global hiring,

0:33:51.600 --> 0:33:54.680
<v Speaker 1>but really everything for them. The second part is, as

0:33:54.720 --> 0:33:57.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of businesses starting to grow global, they realize

0:33:57.560 --> 0:33:59.800
<v Speaker 1>that a lot of their custom San Francisco right hiring

0:33:59.800 --> 0:34:02.160
<v Speaker 1>in there's that five hundred K didn't make a lot

0:34:02.160 --> 0:34:04.320
<v Speaker 1>of sense for their business and for their unit economics.

0:34:04.400 --> 0:34:07.480
<v Speaker 1>So thinking about expending their footprint and hiring people in

0:34:07.520 --> 0:34:10.160
<v Speaker 1>location where it's a bit more affordable is definitely your trend.

0:34:10.160 --> 0:34:12.200
<v Speaker 1>We're seeing from most companies, and some of the largest

0:34:12.200 --> 0:34:13.840
<v Speaker 1>one are coming to us to understand what is the

0:34:13.880 --> 0:34:17.960
<v Speaker 1>best way to do So what is a globally focused

0:34:18.000 --> 0:34:21.600
<v Speaker 1>business right now? Alex because many would say the economies

0:34:21.600 --> 0:34:24.480
<v Speaker 1>are splitting in two and particularly as we see a

0:34:24.600 --> 0:34:28.160
<v Speaker 1>more geopolitical tension, whether it's your versus Russia, whether it's

0:34:28.440 --> 0:34:30.960
<v Speaker 1>China versus the US. You said your co founder is

0:34:31.000 --> 0:34:33.640
<v Speaker 1>from China. How do you see companies wanting to scale

0:34:33.640 --> 0:34:35.680
<v Speaker 1>their footprint at the moment. Are we being limited to

0:34:35.719 --> 0:34:40.000
<v Speaker 1>certain spares? Not really. I think you know, she's American

0:34:40.080 --> 0:34:42.200
<v Speaker 1>but originally was born in China. And you know, the

0:34:42.239 --> 0:34:44.880
<v Speaker 1>way we look at the world, whether it's her or myself,

0:34:45.000 --> 0:34:47.920
<v Speaker 1>is that it's it's less about the geos, It's more

0:34:47.960 --> 0:34:50.120
<v Speaker 1>about the talent. Right. You just want as a company

0:34:50.239 --> 0:34:52.279
<v Speaker 1>to be able to hire the best people wherever they

0:34:52.280 --> 0:34:55.520
<v Speaker 1>are and bring them to your company. Right. So, I've

0:34:55.640 --> 0:34:57.879
<v Speaker 1>not seen people think about regions apart when it comes

0:34:57.920 --> 0:34:59.719
<v Speaker 1>from to time zone, right, And how you want to

0:34:59.719 --> 0:35:01.480
<v Speaker 1>build a culture of the company, and how do you

0:35:01.480 --> 0:35:03.960
<v Speaker 1>want to be very sus in office and not in office.

0:35:04.320 --> 0:35:06.560
<v Speaker 1>But when it comes to those deos, we've seen maybe

0:35:06.640 --> 0:35:10.399
<v Speaker 1>Rush I get less less less hires at the moment,

0:35:10.400 --> 0:35:13.200
<v Speaker 1>but in general, most people have been very geoagnostic when

0:35:13.200 --> 0:35:15.960
<v Speaker 1>it comes to town. Alex, what about your own company

0:35:16.000 --> 0:35:18.440
<v Speaker 1>and its health? You know, Caroline and I are talking

0:35:18.480 --> 0:35:23.480
<v Speaker 1>about tens of thousands of talented people in technology being

0:35:23.560 --> 0:35:27.680
<v Speaker 1>laid off. Are you one of those companies that's currently hiring? Yeah,

0:35:27.680 --> 0:35:29.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean for sure, we are two thousand people across

0:35:29.560 --> 0:35:32.239
<v Speaker 1>a hundred plus locations. You know, we've always been as

0:35:32.239 --> 0:35:34.520
<v Speaker 1>efficient as we could, and being a bit depositive now

0:35:34.600 --> 0:35:37.000
<v Speaker 1>enabled us to really be able to scale further. So

0:35:37.080 --> 0:35:39.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, we have over I think five D plus

0:35:39.239 --> 0:35:41.560
<v Speaker 1>million dollars in the bank. We're generating money now, so

0:35:41.600 --> 0:35:44.239
<v Speaker 1>we'll keep hiring to really bring the message transflution to

0:35:44.320 --> 0:35:46.600
<v Speaker 1>market and really help companies go global. So if you

0:35:46.719 --> 0:35:50.000
<v Speaker 1>know great people, send them send them away. Alright. Deal

0:35:50.080 --> 0:35:53.600
<v Speaker 1>co founder and CEO Alex Bozis, thank you so much

0:35:53.680 --> 0:35:56.880
<v Speaker 1>for sharing Evaluation news but also getting insight into what

0:35:56.960 --> 0:35:58.880
<v Speaker 1>it's like to run a company right now. For me,

0:35:59.320 --> 0:36:01.160
<v Speaker 1>that's the take. It's all well and good having the

0:36:01.280 --> 0:36:04.600
<v Speaker 1>vcs on the public market, investors, the activists talking about

0:36:04.640 --> 0:36:06.520
<v Speaker 1>what they want from a company. When you're at the

0:36:06.560 --> 0:36:10.040
<v Speaker 1>helm trying to raise money, trying to make decisions. It's

0:36:10.080 --> 0:36:12.839
<v Speaker 1>interesting to see somebody so confident and there's a lot

0:36:12.840 --> 0:36:15.240
<v Speaker 1>of negativecy out there. Well, I mean a bootstrap business

0:36:15.280 --> 0:36:18.960
<v Speaker 1>to begin with, a why combinator, well known Silicon Valley

0:36:19.040 --> 0:36:23.800
<v Speaker 1>focused startup culture. I'm interested that he was talking already

0:36:23.840 --> 0:36:27.000
<v Speaker 1>all the Lexican that investors, public investors and private investors

0:36:27.040 --> 0:36:31.840
<v Speaker 1>want to hear. Ebitdre positive efficiencies, hiring across the world

0:36:31.880 --> 0:36:35.040
<v Speaker 1>to ensure that they're basically making sure that they're efficient

0:36:35.120 --> 0:36:38.680
<v Speaker 1>right now, that they're not over scaling, over hiring, over indulging,

0:36:38.960 --> 0:36:40.440
<v Speaker 1>which is what so many of the big companies have

0:36:40.520 --> 0:36:42.719
<v Speaker 1>been doing basically and having to rewind them to be fair.

0:36:42.760 --> 0:36:44.800
<v Speaker 1>The other big theme that we've heard is that investors

0:36:44.840 --> 0:36:48.240
<v Speaker 1>look for quality in times like these where okay, actually

0:36:48.280 --> 0:36:50.920
<v Speaker 1>being profitable for many companies as a distant dream right

0:36:50.920 --> 0:36:53.759
<v Speaker 1>now could be an attractive investment. But if you're scaling

0:36:53.800 --> 0:36:56.080
<v Speaker 1>a revenue at four with the many years time so

0:36:56.280 --> 0:37:07.200
<v Speaker 1>they're doing now with us both stood right here in

0:37:07.239 --> 0:37:10.240
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco. Let's do something very local for going viral,

0:37:10.320 --> 0:37:13.360
<v Speaker 1>because the Tesla fraud trial is underway right here in

0:37:13.360 --> 0:37:16.200
<v Speaker 1>this city. And look Elon Musk continuing his testimony right

0:37:16.239 --> 0:37:19.080
<v Speaker 1>on Monday, and he said, what the saludo ABIs sovereign

0:37:19.120 --> 0:37:22.720
<v Speaker 1>well fund quote unequivocally wanted to give him the money,

0:37:23.000 --> 0:37:25.719
<v Speaker 1>But there was no email about it. He just said

0:37:25.719 --> 0:37:27.480
<v Speaker 1>it was their word was as good as that. But

0:37:27.520 --> 0:37:29.480
<v Speaker 1>of course it's all in defenses and tweets here sent back.

0:37:30.239 --> 0:37:32.640
<v Speaker 1>That's part one of the defense. The other thing, and

0:37:32.719 --> 0:37:35.640
<v Speaker 1>it extends from Friday, is that Elon Musk kind of

0:37:35.640 --> 0:37:39.520
<v Speaker 1>rejected the idea that his tweets influenced Tesla's share price,

0:37:39.560 --> 0:37:43.640
<v Speaker 1>and actually he questioned how seriously anyone took his tweets.

0:37:43.680 --> 0:37:46.520
<v Speaker 1>But having since bought Twitter, he talked about Twitter being

0:37:47.160 --> 0:37:51.319
<v Speaker 1>a very trustworthy, reliable sort of news in journalism. Yeah, well,

0:37:51.360 --> 0:37:52.719
<v Speaker 1>we did what we always do on this show. We

0:37:52.760 --> 0:37:56.319
<v Speaker 1>asked our audience to react to the quote that he

0:37:56.440 --> 0:38:00.000
<v Speaker 1>put about whether or not his tweets should be trust

0:38:00.080 --> 0:38:02.640
<v Speaker 1>did He said, just because I tweet about something doesn't

0:38:02.680 --> 0:38:05.560
<v Speaker 1>mean people believe it will act accordingly, do you agree

0:38:06.560 --> 0:38:11.200
<v Speaker 1>negative say that's insane? Of course, they felt that he

0:38:11.280 --> 0:38:14.520
<v Speaker 1>puts out tweets that people believe that act on. I mean,

0:38:14.760 --> 0:38:16.880
<v Speaker 1>there has been criticism time and time again of the

0:38:16.920 --> 0:38:20.040
<v Speaker 1>way in which he's perhaps talked up certain companies, certain

0:38:20.360 --> 0:38:23.120
<v Speaker 1>crypto assets. Goodness knows what. But people move and they

0:38:23.200 --> 0:38:25.920
<v Speaker 1>make asset allocation decisions of what he tweets. Yeah, and

0:38:25.920 --> 0:38:28.320
<v Speaker 1>why he doesn't use a regulatory filing instead of the tweet?

0:38:28.440 --> 0:38:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Tweet is his method of choice? Yeah, many politicians would agree.

0:38:32.840 --> 0:38:34.879
<v Speaker 1>Was it a tweet that almost broke the internet today

0:38:34.920 --> 0:38:37.680
<v Speaker 1>as well? Is then an m using not Eminem the rapper,

0:38:38.040 --> 0:38:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Eminem's when you eat, look at this, we'll bring it

0:38:41.280 --> 0:38:43.239
<v Speaker 1>up on the screen and just a moment, Eminem's is

0:38:43.320 --> 0:38:47.960
<v Speaker 1>reconsidering It's spokes candies. You see the former spokes candies

0:38:47.960 --> 0:38:50.919
<v Speaker 1>along the bottom there. They have a new spokesperson. Yeah,

0:38:50.960 --> 0:38:53.880
<v Speaker 1>and apparently everyone can rally behind her. Is kind of

0:38:53.920 --> 0:38:56.319
<v Speaker 1>what they say, Maya Rudolph, They say, we're confident Mss

0:38:56.360 --> 0:38:59.160
<v Speaker 1>Rudolph will champion the power of fun to create a

0:38:59.160 --> 0:39:02.239
<v Speaker 1>world where everyone feels they belong. Of course, many think

0:39:02.320 --> 0:39:04.200
<v Speaker 1>this might be about the Super Bowl rather went out

0:39:04.200 --> 0:39:05.960
<v Speaker 1>from the Super Bowl. Let's wait and see if this

0:39:06.040 --> 0:39:08.640
<v Speaker 1>is real life. Eminem's are determined to break the Internet.

0:39:08.880 --> 0:39:10.799
<v Speaker 1>We didn't break the Internet. We talked all about it.

0:39:10.800 --> 0:39:13.400
<v Speaker 1>That that does it for this edition of Bloomberg Technology Tuesday.

0:39:13.600 --> 0:39:15.680
<v Speaker 1>We've got so much more in terms of interactive advertising.

0:39:15.680 --> 0:39:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Ber O c O David Cohen's going to be joining.

0:39:17.680 --> 0:39:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Don't forget, you've got to recap everything on the podcast Spotify.

0:39:21.440 --> 0:39:22.320
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg