Speaker 1: The people who are building this technology.
Speaker 2: Please excuse me, this is a minute.
Speaker 1: I'd like to get those six seconds back. Please, thank you.
Speaker 2: Oh it's okay. You could continue to be afraid of
Speaker 2: my greatness while I time travel around your laps.
Speaker 1: Kill Einstein and ruined Cleopatra. Rice is considered a symbol
Speaker 1: of fertility and prosperity. Nobody wants to get pasta thrown
Speaker 1: at them at a wedding. All right, ladies and gentlemen.
Speaker 2: Flying is fun, and visibility is great if you're feeling
Speaker 2: a little sneaky. But time travel is the power that
Speaker 2: gives you an edge in literally every situation.
Speaker 1: What are you gonna do when you drop your phone
Speaker 1: in the pool? Put it in PASTI you could ye.
Speaker 2: Yes, because finally, rice has a function other.
Speaker 1: Than being How about rice is the answer? Right, the
Speaker 1: only thing you need when you're gay.
Speaker 2: I'd like to reply to that.
Speaker 3: Nager. Welcome people of Earth to this very special episode
Speaker 3: of In our Own World podcast, The Great Debate. I
Speaker 3: know you've been on the edge of your seats, begging
Speaker 3: for a peek inside the brilliant and sometimes chaotic minds
Speaker 3: of our hosts. They've argued, they've bickered. But today we
Speaker 3: are going to get to the bottom of your most
Speaker 3: pressing questions, the stuff that keeps you up at night,
Speaker 3: the stuff you can't even google. Now, before we stir
Speaker 3: the pod, if you don't know who I am, well,
Speaker 3: shame on you, truly. I'm Chris, Yes, the one and only,
Speaker 3: the always charming, often biased moderator of your dreams. I
Speaker 3: worked behind the scenes on seasons one and two on
Speaker 3: a few prolific episodes. And in case you're doubting my
Speaker 3: moderating ability, I grew up in a Puerto Rican household,
Speaker 3: so arguing is basically my first language. Now let me
Speaker 3: set the stage for you. We're talking about the stuff
Speaker 3: that will have you debating with your abla over the
Speaker 3: next family dinner, which is the superior superpower, what came first,
Speaker 3: the chicken or the egg? Should parents grant their kids
Speaker 3: actual privacy? And of course, how do we really feel
Speaker 3: about space exploration? Before we jump into the chaos, a
Speaker 3: quick little disclaimer. These views presented in this debate do
Speaker 3: not necessarily represent or reflect the personal opinions of our hosts, moderators,
Speaker 3: or heck, anyone involved. We're here to entertain and not write. Manifestos.
Speaker 3: Now let's go over the rules, and yes there are rules.
Speaker 3: Each host will get an opening statement, so brace yourselves
Speaker 3: for impact. We'll cover a few fiery topics one at
Speaker 3: a time, and for each topic, each host will have
Speaker 3: two minutes to make their case, followed by a quick
Speaker 3: fire one minute rebuttal where you can really dig in. Finally,
Speaker 3: each host will have two minutes for their closing stack.
Speaker 3: Things will either wrap up nicely or explode into full chaos,
Speaker 3: and let's hope for both. And of course the number
Speaker 3: one rule, no holding back. We want drama, we want conviction,
Speaker 3: we want to see passion. But remember respect the clock.
Speaker 3: My timer, does I lie, and neither does my finger
Speaker 3: hovering over the mute button. So Emily, are you ready?
Speaker 3: I'm ready for your opening statement to this debate?
Speaker 1: I'm ready.
Speaker 3: All right, let's hear it.
Speaker 1: Humans of Earth, outer space, deep sea people, because I'm
Speaker 1: sure you get this channel and are commonly not talked
Speaker 1: about today. You're gonna hear some very very interesting information.
Speaker 1: But what you're gonna hear more is passion from me
Speaker 1: to you. What I care about is getting you the
Speaker 1: information that I know is closest to the truth. Because
Speaker 1: so often in this life we are lied to and
Speaker 1: you don't deserve that. You deserve the best, and that's me.
Speaker 1: My opponent tonight is gonna come at you with facts.
Speaker 1: It's gonna come at you with you know, wit and beauty.
Speaker 1: Do not be distracted by this, because remember, I will
Speaker 1: bring you what really matters. I am your friend, I
Speaker 1: am your confidant. I am small, so I am not intimidating,
Speaker 1: and I am funny and I care about what you
Speaker 1: care about. And as you will see, I often am
Speaker 1: on the correct side of an argument, and I can
Speaker 1: bring it to you with sas can do a little
Speaker 1: shimmy while I give you something that hurts so it
Speaker 1: doesn't burn as bad. I can make funny faces. So
Speaker 1: I'm telling you information that's hard to hear. That is
Speaker 1: what I am there for. But today what I am
Speaker 1: really here for is, as you will see, not completely
Speaker 1: oppose my opponent, because life is about gray area, and
Speaker 1: in that gray area there's always one side that leans
Speaker 1: more in one direction, like for example, being gay and
Speaker 1: being straight. I have a preference, which is women, and
Speaker 1: today you will have a preference, which will be me.
Speaker 1: Thank you so much, and I love you well.
Speaker 3: Emily, thanks for shouting out the LGBTQ plus qia x
Speaker 3: y Z community. That was beautiful. You're welcome, Jeminy Hernandez.
Speaker 3: Are you ready?
Speaker 2: I am ready?
Speaker 1: Oh.
Speaker 3: I would love to hear your opening statement.
Speaker 2: People of the multiverse. I know we're at a debate,
Speaker 2: and I'm not here just to debate. I'm here to win.
Speaker 2: You're gonna hear a lot of things tonight, some true,
Speaker 2: some false. Some might sound like a game straight out
Speaker 2: of somebody's ours. My opponent, Emily, she's gonna try to
Speaker 2: woo you Emmy nomination here, Grammy nomination, their big rock
Speaker 2: star energy. But don't be fooled. I know the real Emily.
Speaker 2: She's going to come in here guns and blazing because
Speaker 2: she's going to try, for the first time to be right,
Speaker 2: which Spoilerlert doesn't happen very often. Now. I know that
Speaker 2: you people are logical, smart, witty individuals, and I'm going
Speaker 2: to present the facts because they do all the work
Speaker 2: for me. I'm looking forward to have a wonderful evening.
Speaker 2: I'm really happy to be here with you all, and
Speaker 2: I also look forward to winning. So let's have a
Speaker 2: great debate.
Speaker 3: Wild Gemini from that opening statement. I would bet to
Speaker 3: think that maybe you're not here just a debate. You're
Speaker 3: here to straight up argue, and I love that energy.
Speaker 3: We're gonna get into the first question, and we're gonna
Speaker 3: start off with a real heavy hitter here. We're gonna
Speaker 3: get into real deep territory. People think about this really regularly,
Speaker 3: so I'm grateful that we're tackling the real issues here.
Speaker 3: Let's get this going. What came first, the chicken or
Speaker 3: the egg? Emily, You're gonna answer this question first.
Speaker 1: Okay, mister moderator. Sounds good.
Speaker 2: What's this voice?
Speaker 1: It's my debate voice.
Speaker 2: Oh goodness.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna lull you into a false sense.
Speaker 3: Oh good I'm debating whether that's a good choice.
Speaker 1: Okay, welcome. Let me set the scene for you for
Speaker 1: one of the most important things that you're ever gonna hear.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna take you right to the intersection of where
Speaker 1: science and religion hold hands and cross. Have you ever
Speaker 1: heard anything crazier because I certainly haven't. Well, I'm gonna
Speaker 1: tell you why the chicken and the egg? We're not
Speaker 1: sure for so long? What is it that is the
Speaker 1: truth about this dilemma? And I'm gonna tell you right now,
Speaker 1: the chicken came before the egg. And this is why
Speaker 1: I'm not arguing at all that the egg in and
Speaker 1: of itself is something that did not perhaps exists in
Speaker 1: its own generation. But we are talking about the chicken here,
Speaker 1: all right. Prior to the actual chicken existing, the first
Speaker 1: chicken that was born had to come from two non chickens,
Speaker 1: a line of bird that, when they started to mate
Speaker 1: over time, began to turn into what we now call
Speaker 1: the chicken. However, the first egg that hatched that was
Speaker 1: the chicken, could not be called the chicken because it
Speaker 1: was a genetic mutation that happened in the egg. Therefore,
Speaker 1: the egg itself was not the first true chicken egg.
Speaker 1: The first chicken that was born that was the first
Speaker 1: true chicken. That egg that it laid, that was the
Speaker 1: first true chicken egg. That's number one. Now let's go
Speaker 1: to the religious component creation, all right. The chicken just
Speaker 1: did the egg, you know, did it just fall out
Speaker 1: of the sky, you know, just like human beings, you know,
Speaker 1: we had to come from some source. A chicken actually
Speaker 1: cannot physically lay an egg without a hen being present.
Speaker 1: There is an actual protein in the hens ovary that
Speaker 1: allows for the egg to be laid. So therefore you
Speaker 1: cannot have an egg without chicken. So it could have
Speaker 1: been one of God's creations or Unity's creations, like human
Speaker 1: beings like Adam and Eve chicken chief. All I'm saying
Speaker 1: is that we know that the chicken did in fact
Speaker 1: come before the egg, and it crossed the road to
Speaker 1: get to the other side.
Speaker 3: Thank you, Wow, that was amazing. I am no Gemeny.
Speaker 3: Can you please give us your take on this hard
Speaker 3: hitting question.
Speaker 2: All right, I think we're gonna cut through the fluff
Speaker 2: here and get practical. We're not going to overcomplicate it.
Speaker 3: Fact check, chickens don't have fluff, they have feathers.
Speaker 2: Sorry about that. My opponent here so eloquently, probably unintentionally
Speaker 2: proved my point. You see, it doesn't matter what time
Speaker 2: the chicken joined the scene, because long before chickens, long
Speaker 2: before birds, even the egg arrived to the scene.
Speaker 3: First.
Speaker 2: You're absolutely right, genetic mutations do take place within the egg,
Speaker 2: and it is not without that egg, this perfect little vessel,
Speaker 2: perfect container of life, symbol for life everywhere, came onto
Speaker 2: the scene that the chicken could even be a possibility.
Speaker 2: I'm talking dinosaurs, I'm talking millions of years before our
Speaker 2: feathery friends joined the scene. So the answer is simple,
Speaker 2: what came first, the chicken or the egg? Well, of
Speaker 2: course it was the egg.
Speaker 1: Wow, all right, what can I can I have a rebuttal?
Speaker 2: Please? Of course you have up to one minutarybut.
Speaker 1: Okay, please me set the time. Thank you so much
Speaker 1: for bringing up that point. But I, in fact did
Speaker 1: not walk into your chicken trap because in the context
Speaker 1: of the question what came first the chicken or the egg,
Speaker 1: we're assuming that it is a chicken egg that you're
Speaker 1: talking about, because the dinosaur eggs are, yes, a good example. However,
Speaker 1: what laid those eggs? Right now, what I'm saying is like,
Speaker 1: where did those eggs come from?
Speaker 3: Correct?
Speaker 1: So that was my point at the intersection of science
Speaker 1: and religion, because at some point we have to have
Speaker 1: some explanation for how these creatures got on the scene
Speaker 1: at all. My point about the ovaries of the chicken
Speaker 1: being needed to be able to create the egg is
Speaker 1: the point that when we're talking about in the cycle
Speaker 1: of how chickens quote unquote came on the scene. As
Speaker 1: you said, the true definition of a chicken first we
Speaker 1: had the chicken, then we had the egg. The broader
Speaker 1: philosophical question is, in fact, did the chicken fall out
Speaker 1: of the sky or did an alien put it here?
Speaker 1: Was it God or you know? Or is this a
Speaker 1: video game? So, yes, the chicken came first.
Speaker 2: I'd like to respond, yes, please, okay, I understand you're
Speaker 2: saying that you need a chicken to lay a chicken egg.
Speaker 2: But before the chicken came onto the scene, we had
Speaker 2: two non chickens that laid an egg, and it was
Speaker 2: within that egg that the genetic mutation took place that
Speaker 2: led us to the very first chicken. There is no
Speaker 2: chicken without the egg that created the first chicken.
Speaker 1: Who created the first egg?
Speaker 2: It wasn't a chicken, What was it. That's not the question.
Speaker 1: You're taking it outside of the context of the chicken.
Speaker 1: You're saying broader strokes, right, So trace it back to
Speaker 1: the first egg.
Speaker 2: If by that log I'm saying we don't have to
Speaker 2: go that far. I'm saying two dinosaurs, two non chicken dinosaurs, laid.
Speaker 1: An egg, and who made those dinosaurs.
Speaker 2: Within those That's not the question, but it is.
Speaker 1: You cannot ignore that aspect of the question. If you're
Speaker 1: going back to the lineage of the egg itself and
Speaker 1: not the chicken egg, because I think you would agree
Speaker 1: my argument of the chicken egg is true. But then
Speaker 1: to be able to validate your argument, you need to
Speaker 1: go to the inception of the initial animal that no,
Speaker 1: you don't made or just need to.
Speaker 2: Go to the animal. You just need to go to
Speaker 2: the proto chicken, which is the which is the animal?
Speaker 2: Right before? Are fraid we're not asking who made who
Speaker 2: created life? We're asking which came first, the chicken or
Speaker 2: the egg? It had to be the egg.
Speaker 1: Well, but now you're taking it outside of the concept
Speaker 1: of the chicken. You're saying, well, the egg has been
Speaker 1: around forever, but who and who laid the first egg?
Speaker 2: Well it wasn't a chicken, I'll tell you that.
Speaker 1: Well, whatever it is, the erect.
Speaker 2: Anthropods, I don't know God. But the question is not
Speaker 2: what came first, the chicken, the egg, or God. The
Speaker 2: question is which came first, the chicken or the egg?
Speaker 2: And the answer is the egg.
Speaker 1: The answer is the chicken. Thank you you guys, let
Speaker 1: us know out there what you think.
Speaker 3: I think that we got some real good digging here.
Speaker 3: But just pruis your points that we don't know who
Speaker 3: is the proto chicken. If anybody out there knows who
Speaker 3: the proto Chicken was, please hit us up. I need
Speaker 3: to know who is the proto Chicken, the prototype, the protozoa.
Speaker 3: We need to know this. All right, We're gonna be
Speaker 3: right back after this quick break. All right, that was
Speaker 3: a really good first round. You guys kept it very civil,
Speaker 3: civil for my like, but I understand you wanna display
Speaker 3: a sense of respect for the other and that's cute.
Speaker 3: But we're gonna keep getting into this and we're gonna
Speaker 3: move on to the next question. All right, AI embrace
Speaker 3: or disgrace? Is artificial intelligence the future we've been waiting for?
Speaker 3: Or is it one way tickets to Doomsville? Geminy m
Speaker 3: when first for the first round? Now it is your turn.
Speaker 2: Okay, So to answer your question, AI isn't just the future,
Speaker 2: it's right now. And honestly, if you're not gonna get
Speaker 2: aboard the train, you're gonna miss it. I know people
Speaker 2: get a little freaked out when they hear about AI.
Speaker 2: They start picturing robots taking over the world doing our
Speaker 2: jobs and basically turning the terminator into a real life movie.
Speaker 2: But that's not what we're talking about here, because AI
Speaker 2: is making our lives easier, more efficient, and dare I
Speaker 2: say it more fun? Who here loves to wait on
Speaker 2: hold for customer service, or sort through thousands of emails manually,
Speaker 2: or do the same boring tasks over and over again.
Speaker 2: None of us. And you want to know what AI
Speaker 2: is here to help with that? It's like having a
Speaker 2: supercharged assistant who never gets tired, never takes a lunch break,
Speaker 2: and always gets it right. And let's not forget that
Speaker 2: AI is already doing a lot of good. It's helping
Speaker 2: doctors diagnose diseases faster and more accurately. It's improving education,
Speaker 2: making it accessible all over the world, streamlining businesses, helping
Speaker 2: fight climate change, and even driving innovation in places that
Speaker 2: we never thought possible. The fear that AI is going
Speaker 2: to take over is just like when the Internet first
Speaker 2: came out, everyone thought that it was going to ruin everything,
Speaker 2: and now we can't live without it. AI isn't just
Speaker 2: here to replace us. It's here to boost us, to
Speaker 2: help us think bigger, work smarter, and yeah, maybe even
Speaker 2: find some time to binge watch that new Netflix show.
Speaker 2: Let's be real most of us rely on AI already,
Speaker 2: whether it's Google helping us fake knowing something that we
Speaker 2: don't actually know a lot about, or whether it's recommending
Speaker 2: the perfect show for our mood. AI is already in
Speaker 2: our lives, making things easier, and so far I haven't
Speaker 2: seen any robot uprisings, So why are we afraid of it.
Speaker 2: It's like being afraid of your smartphone because it's too smart.
Speaker 2: If we can handle autocorrect trying to ruin our day,
Speaker 2: we can handle AI. It's not about losing control. It's
Speaker 2: about gaining time, efficiency and maybe a little bit of sanity.
Speaker 2: AI is for the future, and I, for one welcome
Speaker 2: our algorithmic overlords, especially if they can help me never
Speaker 2: deal with customer service again. Let's embrace it.
Speaker 3: Well, Jeminy just explained why she has no longer a
Speaker 3: need for me as an assistant. So let's hear Emily's sign, Emily,
Speaker 3: please let us know AI embrace or disgrace, disregard, unplug.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna say disgrace, and I'm gonna say it with
Speaker 1: my voice. I'm gonna say, if AI is a train,
Speaker 1: I don't want a ticket, and I'm gonna tell you
Speaker 1: why because I'm not the only one that says so.
Speaker 1: Believe it or not. One of the biggest and three
Speaker 1: or four of the biggest brains in AI right now
Speaker 1: are the ones who are eating the cause to stop
Speaker 1: the growth and put a pause on what's happening right now,
Speaker 1: because technology does in fact grow and scare people. However,
Speaker 1: the rate in which technology is growing has increased a
Speaker 1: bunch other than you. Okay, so here we go. Listen
Speaker 1: to this. You're gonna say that AI enhances what we do. Well,
Speaker 1: what happens when it enhances it to the point that
Speaker 1: it is too much and replaces what we do. Listen
Speaker 1: to this quote. The idea that this stuff could actually
Speaker 1: get smarter than people. I thought it was way off. Obviously,
Speaker 1: I no longer think that. Jeoffrey Hinton, one of Google's
Speaker 1: top artificial intelligence scientists also known as a godfather of AI.
Speaker 1: He said this right after he quit his job in
Speaker 1: April to warn people about the dangers of the technology
Speaker 1: that he himself created. He's not the only one worried.
Speaker 1: A twenty twenty three survey of AI experts sound that
Speaker 1: thirty three percent not per sex of fear developed may
Speaker 1: result in a nuclear level catastrophe. Guess whose signatures are
Speaker 1: on this? Steve Wozniak, Elon Musk and the CEO of
Speaker 1: the only two AI companies leading the charge right now,
Speaker 1: all their signatures are on it. Please go ahead and
Speaker 1: fact check that. All right, once it can improve itself,
Speaker 1: which is not a few years away, it is going
Speaker 1: to take over. It's going to find a way to
Speaker 1: not be able to shut down. It's going to take
Speaker 1: your jobs. Oh please, it's going to be a security threat.
Speaker 1: Privacy out of the window. And then you're gonna rely
Speaker 1: on it, all right, You're gonna rely on it in
Speaker 1: a way that is extremely scary. Think of it this way.
Speaker 1: Why would we expect a newborn baby to beat a
Speaker 1: grand master in chess? It is dangerous. We have to
Speaker 1: be careful. We'll take over our weapons, we'll take care
Speaker 1: of everything that we are plugged into. Take away creativity,
Speaker 1: take away reliability, ruin education in many many ways. And
Speaker 1: we're not gonna be able to simply hit the off switch.
Speaker 1: Super intelligence will find every possible way to take actions
Speaker 1: to prevent plea being shut off. So don't get on
Speaker 1: this train. Get on the train of natural reality and humanity.
Speaker 3: All I am you are out?
Speaker 2: Huh I'd like to reply to that.
Speaker 3: Oh, you'd like to retittle this tittle.
Speaker 2: I would Emily, fear mongering isn't the solution. Good policy is.
Speaker 2: We're not gonna lose jobs to AI. We might replace
Speaker 2: some jobs, but by twenty thirty, AI could actually contribute
Speaker 2: to fifteen point seven trillion dollars to the global economy
Speaker 2: and create ninety seven million new jobs. It's about replacing
Speaker 2: the mundane tasks that human beings don't want to be
Speaker 2: doing anyway, Like when we used to do long division,
Speaker 2: and now all of us in this room especially grew
Speaker 2: up using a calculator. It's about giving us more time
Speaker 2: to do the highly efficient human creative jobs, focusing on
Speaker 2: the things that we'd rather focus on than doing the
Speaker 2: boring things. We can let AI take care of that,
Speaker 2: we can monitor it, we can establish good policy to
Speaker 2: make sure it doesn't get out of hand, and we
Speaker 2: can enjoy the benefits of being a society that is
Speaker 2: so intelligent that we've created these artificial intelligent beings to
Speaker 2: take over a lot of these tasks for us.
Speaker 1: Well, I'm not fear mongering. I'm telling the truth. The
Speaker 1: people who are building this technology. Please, Elion, excuse me,
Speaker 1: this is the minute true. I'd like to get those
Speaker 1: six seconds back. Please, thank you.
Speaker 3: You have them.
Speaker 1: The people who themselves are in the infrastructure of this,
Speaker 1: that know way more about it than we do. They
Speaker 1: are afraid. They're seeking an immediate halt. And yes, we
Speaker 1: have to find a way to regulate. However, you can't
Speaker 1: regulate what you don't know. Look what's happened to the
Speaker 1: music industry. Look what's happened to so many industries the internet.
Speaker 2: Speaking, I'm sorry.
Speaker 3: You need to you need you need.
Speaker 1: I'm not going to say anything else. Thank you. Well, everyone,
Speaker 1: I would appreciate if you stopped interrupting me during my minute.
Speaker 3: Yeah, thank you. I will mute you and we will
Speaker 3: not have a mute to me. Also, if Elon is
Speaker 3: scared of AI, then I am now a little bit
Speaker 3: more into it. We are going to our next question.
Speaker 3: All right now, parents, I want you guys to really
Speaker 3: open up your ears. So if there is any lint
Speaker 3: or dustin them, go get a cute tip then come
Speaker 3: back because you're gonna need to hear this. This is
Speaker 3: very This is the thing parents, kids, Privacy a right
Speaker 3: or a myth should parents let their kids have actual
Speaker 3: privacy or is snooping around part of the gig? Is
Speaker 3: it know everything or trust? But verify where is the
Speaker 3: line between protection and invasion? Also, parents, blink twice if
Speaker 3: you've read your kid's diary, I promise I'm not gonna snitch. Well, Emily,
Speaker 3: it is your turn to answer this question first, and
Speaker 3: I will make sure to keep Geviny quiet.
Speaker 1: Good ladies, germs, domains, dromones, earth things, worms. I'm going
Speaker 1: to tell you that my opponent is going to try
Speaker 1: to use tactics to win, as she said in her
Speaker 1: opening statements, But I'm not here to win or lose them.
Speaker 1: Here to tell you the truth. Like I told you,
Speaker 1: I'm going to tell you some hard truths, and they
Speaker 1: may be scary, but it is why I am standing
Speaker 1: on the side of the arguments that I am. In
Speaker 1: twenty fourteen, Morgan Gayzer and Anissa Wi are both twelve
Speaker 1: years old at the time, stabbed their classmate Peyton nineteen
Speaker 1: times in the woods after luring her there after a sleepover.
Speaker 1: The reason why they did so well they spend a
Speaker 1: lot of time online together following the story of slender Man,
Speaker 1: who they said, if they didn't kill somebody and sacrifice them,
Speaker 1: would go and kill their families. They believe this all right.
Speaker 1: They spent hours and hours online researching. Their parents had
Speaker 1: no idea this was two twelve year old girls. Ninety
Speaker 1: three percent of school shooters planned the attack in advance.
Speaker 1: And of those ninety three percent, guess how many of
Speaker 1: them are under twenty one years old?
Speaker 2: Most of them.
Speaker 1: Most school shooters are between the age of eighteen and
Speaker 1: twenty one, and their parents nothing. How do we stop
Speaker 1: these things from happening. We realize that we're living in
Speaker 1: a world that we don't quite understand yet, and the
Speaker 1: way that we need to stop them that is while
Speaker 1: our children are children. Okay, I'm not saying that privacy
Speaker 1: is not something that we need. It needs to be earned.
Speaker 1: It's something that you need to learn how to respect
Speaker 1: the responsibility of having privacy, because guess what happens when
Speaker 1: you don't. You have predators online after your children. You
Speaker 1: have drug dealers selling them stuff on Snapchat. You have
Speaker 1: pornography and violence, you have mental condition, you have school shooting.
Speaker 1: As I mentioned, you don't have any awareness of your
Speaker 1: digital footprint, peer influence. All these things that can really
Speaker 1: damage your life. That can't happen when you're trusted with
Speaker 1: the responsibility of privacy at such a young age. You
Speaker 1: have to earn it and then you'll have a bond
Speaker 1: and a better relationship with your family and the people
Speaker 1: that are taking care of you, and then you really
Speaker 1: know how to use privacy. But if it's misused, just
Speaker 1: look around at the world at what's happening. We've got
Speaker 1: fentanyl being sold to nine year olds on Snapchat who
Speaker 1: don't know what it is with a ghost of emoji.
Speaker 1: Do better. Privacy is for when you're older. Thank you.
Speaker 3: Wow, all right, well Jeminy, what is your reply?
Speaker 2: So that okay, my reply to that is, Emily, those
Speaker 2: kids who went around and did those horrible things are
Speaker 2: probably in the tenth of a percentile of all of
Speaker 2: the kids in the world. We're not asking can hovering
Speaker 2: over your child prevent them from being serial killer? We're
Speaker 2: talking should parents grant their kids privacy? Now, while we're
Speaker 2: talking statistics, I would just like to state that adolescents
Speaker 2: who perceived higher levels of parental control and snooping, we're
Speaker 2: more likely to engage in secrecy and hide information from
Speaker 2: their parents. You see, privacy doesn't mean that they are
Speaker 2: or they aren't going to do something, But it does
Speaker 2: give kids the skills and the opportunity to practice them
Speaker 2: know how when it comes time to make those very
Speaker 2: difficult decisions. Privacy isn't just for kids or about shutting
Speaker 2: the door or not reading their text. It's about respect.
Speaker 2: It's about respecting them as individuals who are growing and
Speaker 2: figuring out who they are. Kids and teens, believe it
Speaker 2: or not, are just little humans with their own thoughts, feelings,
Speaker 2: and yes, a need for privacy. If we want them
Speaker 2: to grow into well adjusted adults, then we need to
Speaker 2: give them personal space. Think about it. How would you
Speaker 2: feel if somebody was constantly looking over your shoulder, questioning
Speaker 2: you every move, invading your personal space. It would drive
Speaker 2: you nuts. Kids feel the exact same way. Privacy gives
Speaker 2: them a chance to develop a sense of identity and responsibility.
Speaker 2: They need to make their own choices. They need to
Speaker 2: have a space to reflect and yes, mess up a
Speaker 2: little bit, because that's a part of learning. If they
Speaker 2: never get that space, they won't learn to how to
Speaker 2: handle it later on in life, and no one's going
Speaker 2: to be there to supervise them. And let's talk about respect.
Speaker 2: When parents give their kids privacy, they're showing that they
Speaker 2: trust them. They're saying, I believe in your ability to
Speaker 2: make decisions, and honestly, if you're raising them, you should.
Speaker 2: This builds confidence and mutual respect. If kids feel like
Speaker 2: their parents are always snooping over their shoulder and overmanaging
Speaker 2: their lives, it's going to create distance. It sends the
Speaker 2: message that you don't trust them, which leads to secrecy.
Speaker 2: Hold on, and let's be honest, hold on a lot
Speaker 2: unnecessary one second. Privacy isn't a free for all. It's
Speaker 2: about letting them do whatever.
Speaker 3: Which that's not her Emily, do you have anything to
Speaker 3: retittle with that retattle?
Speaker 1: Okay, Geminy, I will say, you bring up good points,
Speaker 1: which is why at the beginning of this debate I
Speaker 1: did say that there is a lot of gray area
Speaker 1: and the thing is black and white.
Speaker 2: Right. Well, it's a debate.
Speaker 1: However, what I will say is that I think that
Speaker 1: privacy is very, very important, but I don't think that
Speaker 1: it's something that should be gifted or automatically just given
Speaker 1: to children, especially at a certain age. I believe that
Speaker 1: the same way that we have to take responsibility for
Speaker 1: how the world is changing. We have to realize that
Speaker 1: perhaps as parents, and I am not one, I'm sure
Speaker 1: my opinions would change when I am one. However, I
Speaker 1: do think that it is important to show the consequences
Speaker 1: of having such a responsibility like the Internet, like being
Speaker 1: able to have time alone with resources that could perhaps
Speaker 1: be harmful to you. So I'm not saying to be
Speaker 1: hovering or rude or anything like that, but I do
Speaker 1: think that is important to restrict at first and slowly
Speaker 1: introduce so by the time that privacy is something that
Speaker 1: they are exercising, it's at a more appropriate age with
Speaker 1: more knowledge.
Speaker 3: Can I respond, Okay, Jim, can you please give us your.
Speaker 2: Rebuttal, I'd love to. I think that there's a difference
Speaker 2: between privacy and I think there's a difference between parental monitoring.
Speaker 2: I think that you can establish your kid with a
Speaker 2: kid's Netflix account or a kid's YouTube account that'll naturally
Speaker 2: limit what they have access to, but their access to
Speaker 2: privacy is not what should be limited. Obviously, you're not
Speaker 2: going to put an infit in front of the Internet
Speaker 2: with capabilities to surf the web and go on websites
Speaker 2: that they shouldn't be on. But kids need privacy. They
Speaker 2: deserve privacy, and when you grant them privacy, the studies
Speaker 2: prove that they're more likely to have positive relationships with
Speaker 2: their parents, they're more likely to divulge, more likely to share,
Speaker 2: and when they don't have privacy, A research from Psychology
Speaker 2: Today shows that helicopter parenting and constant surveillance can lead
Speaker 2: to increased anxiety, depression, self esteem issues, and kids who
Speaker 2: are less capable of handling stress. We don't want to
Speaker 2: throw them to the wolves, but we definitely want to
Speaker 2: let them walk out of the cave on their own.
Speaker 2: Thank you, You're welcome.
Speaker 3: I don't completely agree with you, but I do know
Speaker 3: that the public is really going to be interested in
Speaker 3: what you guys are saying, because even me sitting here,
Speaker 3: I've been pretty interested. Let's take another break, stretch our legs,
Speaker 3: and we'll be right back. Welcome back. If you've made
Speaker 3: it through those ads, you deserve a medal. We are
Speaker 3: getting to the juiciest of parts now. Which superpower is superior?
Speaker 3: From Marvel to dec and everything in between? Who is
Speaker 3: winning the superhero SmackDown? Which power would actually make you
Speaker 3: the ultimate force? I believe Emily went first. The last
Speaker 3: round soul. We are going to start this question with Germania.
Speaker 2: Okay, so I want to talk strategy with you. Time
Speaker 2: travel is the coolest superpower and it's also the most useful. Sure,
Speaker 2: flying is fun and visibility is great if you're feeling
Speaker 2: a little sneaky. But time travel is the power that
Speaker 2: gives you an edge in literally every situation. It's like
Speaker 2: having a remote control for life with a rewind, fast
Speaker 2: forward and pause button. Mess up, rewind and fix it.
Speaker 2: Need more time to make a decision, Hit pause and
Speaker 2: figure it out. Want to skip to the best parts,
Speaker 2: fast forward and skip the nonsense. Think about it. Every
Speaker 2: other superpower is limited to the present moment. You can fly,
Speaker 2: but only where you are right now. You can read minds,
Speaker 2: but only of the people who you are around right now.
Speaker 2: Time travel lets you bend reality. It lets you change
Speaker 2: things to your advantage across all moments, past, present, future.
Speaker 2: It's like getting out of jail free card, a second
Speaker 2: chance button, and a winning the lottery ticket.
Speaker 1: All in one.
Speaker 2: And let's talk long term strategy. Time travel is the
Speaker 2: key to mastering your future. Imagine being able to travel
Speaker 2: ahead of time and see what decisions you should make.
Speaker 2: What investments will pay off or even what had to
Speaker 2: take in life. Everyone else is stuck guessing while you've
Speaker 2: already seen what happens and you can plan accordingly. You
Speaker 2: can dodge every bad decision, avoid every mistake, and maximize
Speaker 2: every single opportunity. That's not just a superpower, that's control
Speaker 2: over your destiny. And what about learning from the past.
Speaker 2: You don't need to rely on history books orr secondhand stories.
Speaker 2: You can go straight to the source. Study with Einstein,
Speaker 2: hang out with Cleopatra, sit on the moon landing. You'd
Speaker 2: be the most informed person in any room on with
Speaker 2: firsthand knowledge no one else could ever get. At the
Speaker 2: end of the day, time travel isn't just about fixing
Speaker 2: mistakes jumping into the future. It's about having total control
Speaker 2: over your life itself. No other superpower, none gives you
Speaker 2: that flexibility, that foresight, or that influence. It's the ultimate
Speaker 2: tool for winning at well everything.
Speaker 3: Wow, jem Emily, Please, before.
Speaker 1: I get to my favorite and the all time best superpower,
Speaker 1: which is in fact flying, all I will say is,
Speaker 1: if you've ever seen Clickjemeny, there's a reason why he
Speaker 1: gives a remote back. In the end, there's a reason
Speaker 1: why all media about time travel always ends in catastrophe.
Speaker 1: Please don't interrupt me. That's the second time you've done that.
Speaker 1: I appreciate you, Stoff, thank you. All right, back to
Speaker 1: flying now at six seconds? My thing?
Speaker 3: Please you have it.
Speaker 1: Flying is the only superpower that does not come with
Speaker 1: bat repercussions. You cannot talk about time travel, you cannot
Speaker 1: talk about super speed and talk about all the negatives
Speaker 1: that come with it. But flight only comes with positive things.
Speaker 1: Mind reading, you could be the loneliest person on earth,
Speaker 1: and you don't know who trusts you. Time travel you
Speaker 1: could alter the entire continuum. You could come back and
Speaker 1: all of a sudden, your entire family's gone. Also, you'd
Speaker 1: be the loneliest person in the world. You know everything,
Speaker 1: how boring. That's not fun. Super speed land comes with overpopulation,
Speaker 1: terrible things. All right, now, think about flying traffic. Do
Speaker 1: you know what it is to avoid traffic? The average
Speaker 1: human spends fifty one hours and stands still traffic per year.
Speaker 1: All right, you just fly over them. You save on
Speaker 1: airfare and travel another three grand average per year that
Speaker 1: people spend on that. You get to have some time
Speaker 1: away from human beings amongst the birds. You have the
Speaker 1: element of surprise and surveillance in multiple situations. All right,
Speaker 1: you have the ability to save animals and things who
Speaker 1: are falling. Who doesn't love a good cape? Everybody, come on,
Speaker 1: all right, Once you have tasted flight, you will forever
Speaker 1: walk the earth with your eyes turned skyward, for there
Speaker 1: you have been, and there you will always.
Speaker 2: Long to return.
Speaker 1: Leonardo da Vinci, Please everybody make the right choice, grab
Speaker 1: your love doing and fly into the sky. Because the
Speaker 1: reality is that we know that it is the only
Speaker 1: superpower that includes a bunch of other superpowers. Not only
Speaker 1: are you're flying, you have super speed, you have surveillance,
Speaker 1: you have the ability to be amongst birds. It's a
Speaker 1: superpower that is chalk full of other superpowers, not to
Speaker 1: mention good oxygen. And while you're up there, you get strong.
Speaker 1: Thank you so much. Flight is the best.
Speaker 3: All right now, Jemeny, do you have any rebuttals?
Speaker 2: M You talked surprise, surveillance, saving animals, all things that
Speaker 2: you could do with time travel. You want to go
Speaker 2: and travel across the world at super speed. What is
Speaker 2: quicker than skipping the transit and going straight to your destination.
Speaker 2: I understand there's fear about misusing time travel as a superpower,
Speaker 2: but you can misuse any superpower. You can fly into
Speaker 2: restricted airspace on your flight, and now there's no more
Speaker 2: oxygen up there. There's less oxygen up there, So you
Speaker 2: would actually have to develop a whole other set of skills.
Speaker 1: And what I said, I said you'd be stronger.
Speaker 2: Oh I'm sorry, excuse me. You said there was more oxygen. True,
Speaker 2: thank you fact checker. You said you would have access
Speaker 2: to more oxygen. You actually have access to less oxygen. Okay,
Speaker 2: so it could be it'd be missed. You shouldn't be
Speaker 2: ban flying because you can fly somewhere that's restricted. Should
Speaker 2: you ban in visibility because someone might use it to
Speaker 2: sneak into a place? The key is learning responsibility. With
Speaker 2: time travel, we would have guidelines, regulations, and maybe a
Speaker 2: little time cop or to talk about jobs, talk about economy,
Speaker 2: the benefits, far away, the risks. Let's throw out the
Speaker 2: best superpower bolt. If you already know that it's time travel,
Speaker 2: all right?
Speaker 1: Uh, you talk about responsibility all right. Responsibility comes with
Speaker 1: an element of control, one that you can't have when
Speaker 1: you do something like time traveling because there are so
Speaker 1: many variables that are out of your control. If somebody
Speaker 1: runs into you and you alter the timeline. You could
Speaker 1: literally be responsible for wiping out an entire family and
Speaker 1: even your own. It's not something that's in your control,
Speaker 1: all right, you're talking about that, Oh, you can do
Speaker 1: all that with time travel. The risk associated with time
Speaker 1: travel is increasingly higher. You can control flight, Yes, you
Speaker 1: can drop the cat when you're picking it up, but
Speaker 1: it would be more in your control.
Speaker 3: It's not.
Speaker 1: Because you happen to see somebody that you're not, or
Speaker 1: you enter a place that you're not, or give someone
Speaker 1: a piece of information that they're not supposed to have.
Speaker 1: You could essentially ruin everything. And I think that it's
Speaker 1: important to note that it's also very lonely experience, because
Speaker 1: again it's not you'd have to travel this world and
Speaker 1: know so many things that nobody else knows, and I
Speaker 1: think that that's a burden that's too much to bear
Speaker 1: when you could just pop your grandchild on your shoulders,
Speaker 1: strap them in, and fly over to Bermuda for no
Speaker 1: charge at all.
Speaker 2: Okay, I would also like to respond to that, Yeah,
Speaker 2: let me give you, let me hear a little bit
Speaker 2: about that. Flying seems convenient, but even professional pilots deal
Speaker 2: with airspace traffic. So just like they would have to
Speaker 2: be airspace cops who are making sure that you're not
Speaker 2: flying above the speed limit where you're flying in your
Speaker 2: lane and you're flying along with all the other flyers.
Speaker 2: Because just like flying, I assume that I would not
Speaker 2: be the only time traveler. There will be time cops.
Speaker 2: There will be checkpoints, I'm sure of it. There will
Speaker 2: be rules regulations that, of course we would have the
Speaker 2: liberty to break, but also the liberty to not break.
Speaker 2: We're not asking are you going to be a responsible
Speaker 2: time traveler? We're asking what's the best superpower? And I
Speaker 2: think that we know the best superpower, the greatest superpower, yes,
Speaker 2: albeit with responsibility attached to it at the same magnitude
Speaker 2: of its awesomeness, is time travel. Thank you.
Speaker 1: The only thing that I'll say to you is that
Speaker 1: in every single example of superheroes or superpowers, I have
Speaker 1: never once, and I challenge you to think the same,
Speaker 1: seen any kind of traffic enforcers or multiple you know,
Speaker 1: over over population or overcrowding of flying people. So Umbrella Academy, No,
Speaker 1: there's not a there's not an air cop and umbrella.
Speaker 2: It's not an air cop. No, but there are time cops.
Speaker 1: Well, I wonder why because it's weak and scary, so
Speaker 1: it needs to be regulated.
Speaker 2: Oh it's okay. You could continue to be afraid of
Speaker 2: my greatness while I time travel around your laps.
Speaker 1: Superhead, kill Einstein and ruined Cleopatra and thank you.
Speaker 3: Now, this question I'm actually nervous about. And I feel
Speaker 3: like it's gonna the Internet's gonna blow up a lot. Media.
Speaker 3: They're gonna be covering this. We're gonna see this on
Speaker 3: Ola magazine next week. So the ultimate showdown Noodles versus Rice? Now,
Speaker 3: this question is gonna rattle some Latin households in the
Speaker 3: Battle of carbs. Who is the real MVP? Are you
Speaker 3: Team Nudes or Team Rice? And to clarify, not the
Speaker 3: kind you accidentally send to your group chat. I did
Speaker 3: that last week, Emily at first last time. Sorry, my
Speaker 3: memory is getting a little hazy. Story, do you right?
Speaker 1: I'm not sure.
Speaker 3: I'm gonna make Geminy go first, because again I am
Speaker 3: a moderator, and I say so, I want to know.
Speaker 2: Okay, okay, all right, if you're still on a fence,
Speaker 2: I'm gonna settle for you right now. Noodles are the
Speaker 2: clear winner. Rice is okay, nice sidekick, side dish. It
Speaker 2: could never have be the main event. Noodles are the
Speaker 2: life of the party. You have spaghetti, ramen, patatai, lasagna.
Speaker 2: Noodles come in every shape, size and flavor. You can
Speaker 2: imagine Rice. It's over there, quietly doing its thing in
Speaker 2: the background. Noodles are the main event. They are the
Speaker 2: Beyonce of carbs. Let's talk versatility, people. Noodles can do anything.
Speaker 2: They can be twirled, slurp, stir, fried, bake, do you
Speaker 2: name it? Noodle's gonna handle it. Rice it sits there
Speaker 2: hoping a good sauce comes along to save it from
Speaker 2: being boring. And let's get into flavor. Noodles soak up
Speaker 2: flavor like a sponge. You get an explosion of taste
Speaker 2: in every single bite. Rice just sort of sits on
Speaker 2: your plate waiting for someone to notice that it's there.
Speaker 2: Noodles are the diva. Rice is the backup dancer. Plus
Speaker 2: Rice might have its place, but it's a supporting role.
Speaker 2: Noodles are the MVP every single time. They're bold, they're flavorful,
Speaker 2: and let's face it, they're just way more fun to
Speaker 2: eat if you're not teen noodles by now you will
Speaker 2: be by the time this debate is over.
Speaker 3: Those were fighting words.
Speaker 1: So those were fighting words.
Speaker 3: Emily, please please put some respects.
Speaker 1: Those were not only fighting words, but they were straight lies.
Speaker 1: Because noodles are not versatile and rice. Rice doesn't sit anywhere.
Speaker 1: Rice is something that you eat when you want to
Speaker 1: eat two thousand of something. Rice is punk rock. Every
Speaker 1: grain of rice is a drop of sweat from a
Speaker 1: farmer's brow. All right, it is healthier, by the way,
Speaker 1: she didn't even talk about the facts.
Speaker 3: All right, and get ready for this.
Speaker 2: Rice can be made into noodles. Ooh, so guess what
Speaker 2: you don't even have.
Speaker 1: To lose because you get rice and noodles. It's gluten
Speaker 1: free pasta, is it? It has less carbs than pasta.
Speaker 1: It has the ability to do different texts at Rocco
Speaker 1: lech crispy sushi. Rice the thing that they make that
Speaker 1: the Chinese people eat kangi, right, that they have for breakfast.
Speaker 1: Noodles can't be a breakfast item. Noodles can't be a
Speaker 1: dessert item. Rice is doing it, doing it, doing it,
Speaker 1: all this stuff, al right. It is the actual versatile thing.
Speaker 1: It can be fried as well steemed as well baked.
Speaker 1: It can be a porridge, it absorbs flavors or what
Speaker 1: are you talking about?
Speaker 3: It?
Speaker 1: Literally are their tiny sponge You want to need a
Speaker 1: million tiny sponges. Yeah, that's what I'm talking about, all right, Again,
Speaker 1: the gluten free thing. There are over one hundred and
Speaker 1: twenty thousand different varieties of rice. You got brown rice,
Speaker 1: you got wild rice, all right, talk about that. It's
Speaker 1: an essential ingredient, not only that it is culturally rich.
Speaker 1: Are Latino people, we cannot exist without rice. And look
Speaker 1: at the amazing things we do with it by a
Speaker 1: yas and like I mentioned, desserts and all of these
Speaker 1: incredible things. Also in culture's rice is considered a symbol
Speaker 1: of fertility and prosperity. Nobody wants to get pasta thrown
Speaker 1: at them at a wedding, all right. It's ladies and gentlemen,
Speaker 1: that is what we are talking about, all right. Even
Speaker 1: and in the places in the world where the highest
Speaker 1: population of people eat rice, which is in areas in
Speaker 1: India and in Asia, they are also the healthiest. All right,
Speaker 1: those people know what is up. And all I have
Speaker 1: to say is that rice is the answer, no matter
Speaker 1: the question. In rice.
Speaker 3: We trust Emily. That was powerful and let's hear what
Speaker 3: this bitch has to say.
Speaker 2: Okay, you want to act like rice is some kind
Speaker 2: of super food. White rice, which is what people mostly eat,
Speaker 2: has a super high glycemic index, meaning that it spikes
Speaker 2: your blood sugar. It's not ideal if we're talking health noodles,
Speaker 2: especially whole wheat, buckwheat, chickpea, spinach. All the different kinds
Speaker 2: of things that you can make noodles with are pack
Speaker 2: of fiber protein. It can be way more nutritious if
Speaker 2: you choose the right type. Plus noodles can be paired
Speaker 2: with a ton of veggies and lean proteins, making it
Speaker 2: a balanced and healthy meal. You want to talk about
Speaker 2: the world, You want to talk about the globe? What
Speaker 2: about Italy's pasta, Japanese ramen, Thailand's patsiu, Vietnamese fu.
Speaker 1: Fu has rice noodles, but they're noodles.
Speaker 2: But they're noodles because guess what you can make noodles
Speaker 2: out of everything? Oh, what are you gonna have over there?
Speaker 2: You're gonna have your cauliflower rice. Good luck eating that.
Speaker 3: Good Cauliflower rice is not rice. That is not up
Speaker 3: for debate.
Speaker 2: I would just like to state Rice is not more
Speaker 2: versatile than noodles. Oh really, oh please, okay it can be.
Speaker 1: Are you gonna make saki out of noodles?
Speaker 2: What? No, You're not gonna make saki out of.
Speaker 1: Noodles, because you can make rice one great? Oh yeah,
Speaker 1: that is great.
Speaker 2: But have a fabulous wine made out of grapes to
Speaker 2: go along with my noodles.
Speaker 1: Because I'm a normal moment, I'm sorry, you're over time, man,
Speaker 1: You're just.
Speaker 2: Mad because noodles are Rice's cooler older cousin who show
Speaker 2: up twirl.
Speaker 1: Around and nobody ship's a noodle inside a necklace and
Speaker 1: writes your name on it. Tiny, All right, Rice is beloved.
Speaker 1: Rice is the answer every time.
Speaker 2: You people literally make what are you gonna do when
Speaker 2: you drop your What are you gonna do when you
Speaker 2: drop your phone in the pool?
Speaker 1: Put it in pasta?
Speaker 2: You could?
Speaker 3: Yeah?
Speaker 2: Because yes, Because finally, Rice has a function other than
Speaker 2: the truth.
Speaker 1: How about Yeah, Rice is the answer the only thing
Speaker 1: you when you're gay.
Speaker 2: Nod I just have to tell you, guys, noodles are
Speaker 2: straight and so they're wet.
Speaker 1: Okay, all right, thank you? Rice wins No Miami, Rice
Speaker 1: instead of Miami Vice.
Speaker 3: That's a new restaurant coming out. Emily's making Miami Rice.
Speaker 3: We have this imposta here. So we are coming up
Speaker 3: on our final questions. So if you are undecided on
Speaker 3: kind of who you're rooting for, if you're rooting for
Speaker 3: Geminy or you're rooting for Emily or A, you're rooting
Speaker 3: for me, keep your opinions to the end. We'll be
Speaker 3: right back. We are on our last question. Wow, I'm sorry, guys,
Speaker 3: I'm actually very sad about this. We were just getting
Speaker 3: really into the nitty gritty. We finally started getting really heated.
Speaker 2: Dumb blow kisses over here that you both can keep
Speaker 2: your kisses. How's that?
Speaker 3: I'll be You're impossible. This is crazy. We heard our
Speaker 3: last question of people. And if you are still reeling
Speaker 3: from the oodles of noodles we just heard, then this
Speaker 3: is this is gonna take it to.
Speaker 2: The noodles and only like four kinds of rice.
Speaker 3: There's not four kinds of thousand.
Speaker 2: Please, I'm not talking about the actual plant. Put the
Speaker 2: man as matthy girl.
Speaker 3: Put some what is our girl's name? Was my girl's name?
Speaker 3: What is my girl's name? From the the YouTube that
Speaker 3: we watch, Oh, yes, put some pen put put respect
Speaker 3: on Penji's name. She has a whole video where she
Speaker 3: makes blue rice purple rice.
Speaker 2: Please, I'm sensing a little bit of bias from a moderator.
Speaker 2: Perhaps we should go on to the next question.
Speaker 3: I introduced myself as often biased. Okay, you expect, Okay,
Speaker 3: I could, I can. You's gonna be on your side.
Speaker 2: That's why you know the podium.
Speaker 1: All right, mister moderator.
Speaker 3: The last question? Yes, sorry, I'm just moved. Okay, all right,
Speaker 3: Space exploration versus solving Earth's problems? All right, so let's
Speaker 3: talk space and not that thing that I need for
Speaker 3: my ex is space the final frontier or the final distraction.
Speaker 3: Today's final question is a big one. Should we be
Speaker 3: investing in the cosmos or should we be focused on
Speaker 3: focusing our very broken planet that we've got under our feet?
Speaker 3: I mean, exploration sounds fun, but have we tried turning
Speaker 3: the Earth on and off again? Now, Emily, you have
Speaker 3: the honor of answering our final question for tonight, so
Speaker 3: please begin.
Speaker 1: As we know, space exploration is something that we still
Speaker 1: don't have so much information about, something that, yes, you know,
Speaker 1: it may cost a lot of money to invest in
Speaker 1: trying to forward this cause. But let's be real, how
Speaker 1: much money did you spend at Target last week? Anyway,
Speaker 1: my point is this, I'm not going to sit here
Speaker 1: and talk to you about the facts because guess what,
Speaker 1: so you don't have them. Space is magical. Space is
Speaker 1: a theory that allows you to block out voices that
Speaker 1: interrupt you when you're trying to make an important point.
Speaker 1: Let's talk about the reality, all right, Earth, we don't
Speaker 1: know how long it's left. Then, yes, my opponent is
Speaker 1: going to tell you we need to stay here and
Speaker 1: we need to take care of it. However, space may
Speaker 1: be the answer for us to take care of it
Speaker 1: and make Earth survive. There are planets that are being
Speaker 1: investigated that might be able to preserve certain endangered speeches
Speaker 1: of hours, or have the ability to have materials and
Speaker 1: resources that can solve things like wildfires and natural disasters
Speaker 1: that may be a source of extinction for us. Shortly,
Speaker 1: we can work together with space exploration to make our
Speaker 1: planet the best place. Another theory that I would love
Speaker 1: fi or became president, is to start a system of
Speaker 1: kicking people off the planet that we don't think should
Speaker 1: be here. We can just launch them right into space.
Speaker 1: Not only is an extremely painful, horrible death that they
Speaker 1: would deserve, but it will create space on the planet,
Speaker 1: which we know that we need all right. Next, we
Speaker 1: could also use these efforts to finally make the Gazorba
Speaker 1: Zobian planet on Rick and Morty correct and have our
Speaker 1: all female planet where we have the males as slaves
Speaker 1: and weigh less of them. Lastly, and the most important
Speaker 1: point Jim's going to talk about Elon just going to
Speaker 1: talk about all these heads of these companies monopolizing space.
Speaker 1: That's not what's going to happen. What's going to happen
Speaker 1: is that you realize that without space exploration, you wouldn't
Speaker 1: have in our own world. You wouldn't have this spaceship
Speaker 1: that we're sitting on right now. So you may think
Speaker 1: that people are monopolizing space, but these two space commanders
Speaker 1: here with all of our guests that we have, are
Speaker 1: living proof of how important it is to keep the
Speaker 1: space exploration program alive, because if not, you would not
Speaker 1: be listening to us right now, not tingling with excitement,
Speaker 1: rushing with oxytocin and endorphins that is all attributed to
Speaker 1: space travel. We wouldn't be here without it. So remember,
Speaker 1: the universe is fast and we're going to get there.
Speaker 1: And by we, I mean my ass. Thank you so
Speaker 1: much for listening.
Speaker 3: Wow, I felt that a hiatus.
Speaker 2: Now EMI is going to try to low blow me
Speaker 2: into breaking the fourth wall and admitting some and admitting
Speaker 2: something that is not the truth about where in our
Speaker 2: own world actually takes place. But we'll keep that for
Speaker 2: another reveal. Here's the thing. Space is really cool, no
Speaker 2: doubt I would know. Who does. I love the idea
Speaker 2: of floating around in zero g or planning a flag
Speaker 2: on Mars. But let's talk about what really matters. Eight
Speaker 2: hundred and twenty eight million people worldwide were affected by
Speaker 2: hunger in twenty twenty one. Two point two billion people
Speaker 2: worldwide lack access to safe drinking water. However, NASA's budget
Speaker 2: for twenty twenty three was twenty five point four billion dollars. Meanwhile,
Speaker 2: many of Earth's urgent problems, like hunger, clean energy, climate adaptation,
Speaker 2: they remain underfunded. The World's wealthiest one percent and I
Speaker 2: won't name names, own more than twice the wealth of
Speaker 2: six point nine billion people combined. Instead of spending billions
Speaker 2: on space exploration, we could redistribute those resources to address
Speaker 2: global inequality that could have a far greater impact on
Speaker 2: lifting people out of poverty, because, let's face it, Mars
Speaker 2: doesn't have breathable oxygen, or clean air, or clean water
Speaker 2: or anything else that we need to survive. Earth is
Speaker 2: our home, and it's the only one that we've got,
Speaker 2: at least for now. Our ecosystems are collapsing, our oceans
Speaker 2: are filling with plastic, and we're still trying to figure
Speaker 2: out how to stop melting the polar ice caps. Why
Speaker 2: are we so eager to hop on a rocket and leave,
Speaker 2: Why so we can just do this to another planet
Speaker 2: and continue the vicious cycle. If it ain't broke, don't
Speaker 2: fix it. Thanks, I'm not done. Thank you very much.
Speaker 2: Trashing your house and deciding to move out before you've
Speaker 2: even cleaned it up. How's that going to work out
Speaker 2: for us in the long run. And let's not forget
Speaker 2: that exploring in space is wildly expensive. We're talking billions
Speaker 2: and billions of dollars. Imagine if we took even a
Speaker 2: fraction of that money and invested it in renewable energy,
Speaker 2: sustainable agriculture, or cleaning a pollution. Imagine if we tackled poverty,
Speaker 2: s food security, clean water access with the same enthusiasm
Speaker 2: that Elon Musk is shooting rockets into space. Those are
Speaker 2: things that would actually improve life for everyone, not five
Speaker 2: people on a million dollar space flight. Plus, if we
Speaker 2: can't even manage our resources here on Earth, how are
Speaker 2: we going to handle an entire planet or space colony.
Speaker 2: We've barely figured out how to stop cutting down rainforest.
Speaker 2: Where are we ready for space? No, we're not ready
Speaker 2: for space yet. So while space is cool, let's get
Speaker 2: a priority straight. Solving Earth's problems isn't just most important,
Speaker 2: it's essential for survival because guess what, we might dream
Speaker 2: of the stars, but we still need to breathe clean
Speaker 2: air and drink clean water down here. Let's fix what's
Speaker 2: broken at home first, and then we can dream about
Speaker 2: the stars.
Speaker 1: Okay, okay, thank you. So first of all, I just
Speaker 1: want to point out that we actually have recently made
Speaker 1: a discovery of a planet that is very similar to
Speaker 1: Earth and does have the potential for resources that we
Speaker 1: could reconstitute and use here that could solve certain things
Speaker 1: like our overpopulation demanding uh you know, food sources and
Speaker 1: water or clean drinking water. Also, that is a economic
Speaker 1: thing and a political thing, which I understand, but there
Speaker 1: is another earth that we have found that it seems
Speaker 1: to be very similar. Also, I want to point out
Speaker 1: that you said that you would be the first person
Speaker 1: to get I.
Speaker 2: Said, if the price was right, I would take a
Speaker 2: recreational flight out into space, not that I think that
Speaker 2: we should have.
Speaker 1: Well, recreational flight out into space is about half a
Speaker 1: million dollars.
Speaker 2: Well, I said, if the price was right, and clearly
Speaker 2: anyway the right place.
Speaker 1: I think that we need to realize that this earth
Speaker 1: we've gotten out of hand with, we've already misused the
Speaker 1: responsibility of taking care of it. And yes, like I said,
Speaker 1: I do think that people monopolizing space like is risky.
Speaker 1: But that's why people like you and me aren't here
Speaker 1: in space. And by the way, I don't know what
Speaker 1: you're talking about, because how dare you lie about the
Speaker 1: fact that we are the first podcast to ever be
Speaker 1: streaming down.
Speaker 2: And throwing money at space is like opening up a
Speaker 2: new toy when you haven't even opened up the last one.
Speaker 2: It's giving spoiled child, I'm going to what they have.
Speaker 2: It's giving spoiled brat, it's giving call back, it's giving
Speaker 2: you don't know responsibility, so you're taking of what we have.
Speaker 3: Wait that space is brat.
Speaker 2: Space is bratt all right?
Speaker 1: You know you know where you can just throw all
Speaker 1: your money at AI. Talk about responsibility.
Speaker 2: Maybe a I can figure out how to clean up
Speaker 2: our oceans.
Speaker 1: No, AI is actually gonna take over everything.
Speaker 3: No, can you eat noodles in space?
Speaker 1: Anyway? We'll see I.
Speaker 2: Space. I'll tell you that much. What are you gonna
Speaker 2: have a thousand little grades of rice and zero gravity?
Speaker 3: Good? Lad?
Speaker 1: Are you talking about? Noodles? Are often and most of
Speaker 1: the time saucy, So talk about sauce in space.
Speaker 2: We're not talking about sauce. We're just talking about noodles
Speaker 2: and rice.
Speaker 1: Okay, Well you're gonna have plain noodles.
Speaker 2: You're rice?
Speaker 1: Absolute?
Speaker 3: Please? Yeah?
Speaker 1: What?
Speaker 2: Please have a little bit of oil?
Speaker 1: All right? Well, I will tell you this, Jim, even
Speaker 1: though I want, though I won and embarrassed you.
Speaker 2: Please and you can enjoy sleeping with the dogs.
Speaker 1: It was an honor to debate you. And thank you,
Speaker 1: mister moderator for such a fine job.
Speaker 3: Well, you guys are welcome, and I'm not telling anybody.
Speaker 3: I'm not saying that I'm not encouraging to join the
Speaker 3: military or not. But there is a new branch of
Speaker 3: the military that was made about five years ago, and
Speaker 3: it is called Space Force. And their flag is so
Speaker 3: cool it looks like something out of Star Track. So
Speaker 3: do with that information you want. But come on, imagine
Speaker 3: being part of Space Force. That's kind of that's a
Speaker 3: little cool.
Speaker 1: Well, I bet you the people on Space Force know
Speaker 1: an awful lot about outer space and the news in
Speaker 1: outer space. And mister moderator and missus opponent in honor
Speaker 1: of us and the official in our own world debates,
Speaker 1: I thought that it would be fun if the three
Speaker 1: of us did a special edition of everybody's favorite out
Speaker 1: of space news networking in the who worlds.
Speaker 3: Sizeness. What do you guys think?
Speaker 1: Should we each read one?
Speaker 3: I think so far this issue eating space rocks keeping
Speaker 3: ourselves fed during a long journey through deep space will
Speaker 3: likely prove difficult. A new study published in the International
Speaker 3: Journey of Astrobiology, a team of scientists suggests astronauts could
Speaker 3: make use of an unusual source of nutrition instead asteroids.
Speaker 3: But before astronauts can start ripping into juicy stone steaks,
Speaker 3: scientists will have a lot of work to do one
Speaker 3: thing that has been confirmed, although reducing the need for
Speaker 3: other long term resource solutions, two point three million dollars
Speaker 3: would need to be added to the budget for a
Speaker 3: good Densis abroad, only furthering Gemeny's argument.
Speaker 2: Look at that well Earthingk's time to blow up another
Speaker 2: asteroid in twenty twenty two and NASA spacecraft intentionally crashed
Speaker 2: into an asteroid to test a planetary defense system and
Speaker 2: it worked. Now the European Space Agency, together with NASA
Speaker 2: and SpaceX, is sending another spacecraft back to conduct more
Speaker 2: tests on the nudged asteroid, but instead of having to
Speaker 2: damage equipment to do so, this time, they're testing a new,
Speaker 2: supposedly more effective tactic where they blast Jojo Siwah's new
Speaker 2: album ont A Loop until the space rock evaporates. NASA
Speaker 2: has reported quote, in initial testing stages, we didn't even
Speaker 2: have to get to the second verse of the song
Speaker 2: and the asteroid was already pulverized. We're very optimistic and
Speaker 2: thankful to miss Sea Water.
Speaker 3: I guess karma is a bitch and that asteroids should
Speaker 3: have known better.
Speaker 1: That's incredible. I mean, sound healing and frequency like treatments
Speaker 1: are real things, so you go down.
Speaker 2: That was very real.
Speaker 1: And lastly, this week in outer space breaking news, NASA
Speaker 1: is downplaying concerns raised in a recent report about a
Speaker 1: long running air leak in the Russian segment of the
Speaker 1: International Space Station oh No. Robin Gaton's director of the
Speaker 1: ISS program at NASA, said repair work had reduced the
Speaker 1: leak rate by about one third. Of people are not
Speaker 1: thinking that that's the case. Accusations of their concealment of
Speaker 1: the severity of this leak began when an audio recording
Speaker 1: went viral where multiple people aboard are heard saying, help us.
Speaker 1: We can't breathe. We're down to the final hours of air.
Speaker 1: Please help us. They're definitely downplaying this situation. There are
Speaker 1: too many of us and we're consuming too much oxygen.
Speaker 1: The weakest will be killed first. Again, they are totally
Speaker 1: downplaying this. Stay tuned for updates and this has been
Speaker 1: space news.
Speaker 3: Thank you guys for having this debate, and I'm grateful
Speaker 3: that we were able to cut into Space news. But
Speaker 3: we need your closing statements. Emily opened our debate. We
Speaker 3: are going to have Geminy close it now. Gemeny, can
Speaker 3: you please give us your words?
Speaker 2: Absolutely, I just want to thank you Chris for being
Speaker 2: the best moderator I've ever seen. I'd like to thank
Speaker 2: my opponent Emily for the laughs, because that's about all
Speaker 2: her information gave me. Now, I told you she was
Speaker 2: going to be charming, I would know I picked her.
Speaker 2: She really was charming, but she really did evade the facts.
Speaker 2: It seems here that Emily's favorite place to go is
Speaker 2: into the extremes and fear manga since of thinking that
Speaker 2: humans aren't capable of monitoring themselves. It's all about us
Speaker 2: getting the information up front, educating ourselves properly, and then
Speaker 2: making sound and well formed decisions throughout. And I personally
Speaker 2: believe that humans have that ability. Keep your noodles on
Speaker 2: the plate and do whatever the hell you want with
Speaker 2: your body, because that is what this country is all about.
Speaker 2: It's about dreams, isn't it.
Speaker 3: Baby.
Speaker 2: Thank you so much for being here today, and I
Speaker 2: can't wait for the next one.
Speaker 3: Thank you Jemeny for those words. Emily. Can we please
Speaker 3: have your closing statement please.
Speaker 1: Dreams do not exist in a world where you feel
Speaker 1: like you have to fit in to a mold, where
Speaker 1: you feel like you need botox. You can't dream in
Speaker 1: that world, you're just falling in line, like eating noodles boring.
Speaker 1: You don't want two thousand of a little grain. You
Speaker 1: don't want your little dog next to you on your
Speaker 1: bed smelling freedoms when you wake up in the morning.
Speaker 1: You really want to have sex with a robot within AI.
Speaker 1: You don't want to do that. Trust me. I've tried,
Speaker 1: and all I have to say is that I love
Speaker 1: you and I'm never gonna let you tell me. How Ever,
Speaker 1: I'm gonna be there for you with Rice. Even though
Speaker 1: she tried to interrupt me, I didn't let that fall
Speaker 1: because I'm there for you, okay. And when we're in space,
Speaker 1: here with me because jem is gonna deorbit, We're gonna
Speaker 1: kick her off the ship because she doesn't believe in
Speaker 1: space expression, but I do. So I'll be here waiting
Speaker 1: for you to hold your hand with my Rice, with
Speaker 1: my pets on the bed, with my ability to fly
Speaker 1: hand in hand. She can't take you anywhere with the
Speaker 1: time traveling. You can go with Gem and ruin the
Speaker 1: world time traveling, and you can fly with me with
Speaker 1: a mouthful of rice. Baby. Thank you so much to
Speaker 1: our moderator. Thank you so much to my opponent who
Speaker 1: has been mean, and I don't lead with that. I
Speaker 1: lead with lies, just the fact that I love you
Speaker 1: and I'm a little bit creepy, and let's be real,
Speaker 1: she said, fear and creepy, and the fact that we
Speaker 1: can't trust people. You absolutely cannot trust people. This is
Speaker 1: a hell hole. So you might as well regulate yourself
Speaker 1: as much as we can so we can survive as
Speaker 1: long as we can fly around and surveill these noodle
Speaker 1: leaders with their pets on the floor. Thank you so much,
Speaker 1: and don't forget I love you you.
Speaker 2: I don't love you, and I don't know you, and
Speaker 2: that's what makes me a better candidate.
Speaker 3: Well, everyone, that's about all the time we have for today.
Speaker 3: I don't know about you, but I feel like we
Speaker 3: just traveled to Mars and back. It has been my
Speaker 3: pleasure to have been the very first moderator for the
Speaker 3: very first debate in outer space. Or if I can
Speaker 3: say anything inspirational, it is that in space no one
Speaker 3: can hear you scream.
Speaker 1: That's true.
Speaker 3: I want to give a special thanks to Jim and
Speaker 3: m for their honesty, lack of strength, and for having
Speaker 3: the audacity to trust me with the mic again, and
Speaker 3: most importantly to all of you for tuning in, because
Speaker 3: without you, we just be yelling into the void, which
Speaker 3: is honestly something we all would be doing. If you're
Speaker 3: watching on YouTube, feel free to like, comment, and subscribe,
Speaker 3: let us know who you believe one, but also keep
Speaker 3: your comments correct. For those listening, Bless your patience and
Speaker 3: I hope that this helped you sort out some very
Speaker 3: important issues or life decisions. But truly thanks from all
Speaker 3: of us from in our own world for the continued support,
Speaker 3: and until next time, People of Earth, stay curious, stay petty,
Speaker 3: and remember space is vast, but so was the Internet's
Speaker 3: common section. So good luck out.
Speaker 2: There, We love you, Thanks for.
Speaker 1: Flying with us. We'll catch you next time on in
Speaker 1: our own world. Bye bye, goodbye, goodbye, goodbye, goodbye, goodbye, goodbye, goodbye,
Speaker 1: goodbye bye
Speaker 3: Launching