WEBVTT - Drilling Deep: The Golden Age of Oil-Funded Influence, with Casey Michel

0:00:09.320 --> 0:00:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome back to Drilled. I'm Amy Westerveldt. For years,

0:00:14.120 --> 0:00:18.200
<v Speaker 1>literally years, people have been pitching me their excellent books

0:00:18.360 --> 0:00:22.160
<v Speaker 1>on climate and policy and energy and democracy. And I

0:00:22.200 --> 0:00:24.680
<v Speaker 1>love all the books, and I never have time to

0:00:24.760 --> 0:00:27.680
<v Speaker 1>read them and do reviews, and I feel terrible about it.

0:00:27.720 --> 0:00:31.720
<v Speaker 1>So we're changing that over here at Drilled. We've launched

0:00:31.720 --> 0:00:34.960
<v Speaker 1>a series called Drilling Deep, in which we will be

0:00:35.080 --> 0:00:39.319
<v Speaker 1>talking to authors about their books. And the hack here

0:00:39.400 --> 0:00:41.080
<v Speaker 1>is that it won't always be me. In fact, it

0:00:41.159 --> 0:00:44.360
<v Speaker 1>might never be me, even though I.

0:00:44.320 --> 0:00:46.800
<v Speaker 2>Do really enjoy reading them and learning more about them.

0:00:47.240 --> 0:00:50.520
<v Speaker 2>This week, Adam Lowenstein, who is doing most of these

0:00:50.560 --> 0:00:55.040
<v Speaker 2>interviews for US, talks to Casey Michelle, the author of

0:00:55.280 --> 0:01:00.280
<v Speaker 2>Foreign Agents, How American lobbyists and lawmakers Threatened democracy around

0:01:00.320 --> 0:01:03.720
<v Speaker 2>the World. The book was actually published last year, but

0:01:03.840 --> 0:01:07.479
<v Speaker 2>Michelle just wrote a really interesting piece in The Atlantic

0:01:07.560 --> 0:01:10.440
<v Speaker 2>that kind of updates the thinking from the book for

0:01:10.640 --> 0:01:15.680
<v Speaker 2>the second Trump administration. Just one quote, America has never

0:01:15.760 --> 0:01:20.800
<v Speaker 2>seen corruption like this. Michelle's book explored the web of lobbyists,

0:01:20.959 --> 0:01:24.800
<v Speaker 2>pr gurus, and former politicians who are paid to influence

0:01:24.880 --> 0:01:29.920
<v Speaker 2>the US government on behalf of foreign regimes and no

0:01:30.080 --> 0:01:34.080
<v Speaker 2>surprise here. One of Trump's first moves in office was

0:01:34.120 --> 0:01:38.559
<v Speaker 2>an executive order stopping enforcement of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.

0:01:39.160 --> 0:01:41.880
<v Speaker 2>Adam had a great conversation with Michelle. I hope you

0:01:42.000 --> 0:01:44.959
<v Speaker 2>enjoy it. Check out the book. We'll link to both

0:01:45.080 --> 0:01:48.600
<v Speaker 2>the book and the Atlantic piece in the show notes,

0:01:49.160 --> 0:01:52.000
<v Speaker 2>and we'll see you back here soon for more drilling.

0:01:52.000 --> 0:02:08.640
<v Speaker 3>Deep cool, let's get into it.

0:02:08.720 --> 0:02:11.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, good place to start is your recent piece in

0:02:11.440 --> 0:02:15.520
<v Speaker 4>the Atlantic titled America has Never seen corruption like This,

0:02:15.680 --> 0:02:19.119
<v Speaker 4>which pretty much sums it up. But let's start with

0:02:20.160 --> 0:02:21.640
<v Speaker 4>some of the arguments you make in that piece.

0:02:22.520 --> 0:02:25.760
<v Speaker 5>Yeah. Well, thank Adam, of course. First things first, thanks

0:02:25.760 --> 0:02:27.839
<v Speaker 5>for having me back. It's great to reconnect. Of course,

0:02:27.880 --> 0:02:29.480
<v Speaker 5>as we were just talking off Mike, I wish it

0:02:29.480 --> 0:02:31.959
<v Speaker 5>was under better circumstances, but that's the world that we

0:02:32.160 --> 0:02:32.720
<v Speaker 5>live in.

0:02:33.120 --> 0:02:34.160
<v Speaker 3>Thanks for coming back on.

0:02:34.280 --> 0:02:38.280
<v Speaker 4>And yeah, we left off at an interesting place during

0:02:38.280 --> 0:02:40.040
<v Speaker 4>the Biden years, and we might get into that a little.

0:02:40.680 --> 0:02:43.760
<v Speaker 5>Yes, the Biden years, I remember those fondly the past,

0:02:44.320 --> 0:02:47.200
<v Speaker 5>truly as a foreign country. Yeah. Look, so the article

0:02:47.240 --> 0:02:49.120
<v Speaker 5>that I have in the Atlantic that you mentioned just

0:02:49.200 --> 0:02:52.840
<v Speaker 5>the other day was not pegged to anyone news development,

0:02:52.840 --> 0:02:57.880
<v Speaker 5>anyone revelation, anyone exposure, or anyone international corruption network. It

0:02:58.000 --> 0:03:00.839
<v Speaker 5>was trying to survey the field over the last six

0:03:00.880 --> 0:03:02.840
<v Speaker 5>months or so, now that we're about six months into

0:03:02.880 --> 0:03:08.800
<v Speaker 5>the new administration, of just how frankly historic the scope

0:03:08.800 --> 0:03:12.160
<v Speaker 5>and the scale of the corruption emanating from and running

0:03:12.160 --> 0:03:14.359
<v Speaker 5>through the White House, and of course the broader kind

0:03:14.360 --> 0:03:16.840
<v Speaker 5>of world of Trump affiliates and the Trump family and

0:03:16.840 --> 0:03:21.040
<v Speaker 5>of course the Trump organization. Truly is what I have

0:03:21.440 --> 0:03:25.079
<v Speaker 5>found on my end is maybe not the most effective things,

0:03:25.160 --> 0:03:27.040
<v Speaker 5>but one effective thing that I found on my end

0:03:27.040 --> 0:03:31.839
<v Speaker 5>in my rioting is trying to examine historic parallels such

0:03:31.840 --> 0:03:38.440
<v Speaker 5>as they are throughout predominantly American history, of networks of valances,

0:03:38.480 --> 0:03:43.240
<v Speaker 5>of stories of corruption, almost all of which throughout the

0:03:43.280 --> 0:03:46.960
<v Speaker 5>predominant of American history have been domestic. Donald Trump is

0:03:46.960 --> 0:03:49.160
<v Speaker 5>by no means the first president of the first administration

0:03:49.240 --> 0:03:52.640
<v Speaker 5>that has been embroiled in corruption scandals. You know, I

0:03:52.720 --> 0:03:55.280
<v Speaker 5>laid out at the outset of the Peace it self

0:03:55.280 --> 0:03:57.240
<v Speaker 5>that you go back to the days of Ulysses S.

0:03:57.320 --> 0:04:01.480
<v Speaker 5>Grant and his family members in inner circles, It go

0:04:01.520 --> 0:04:03.640
<v Speaker 5>back to the days of Warren Harding and Teapot Dome.

0:04:03.680 --> 0:04:05.440
<v Speaker 5>Of course, go back to the days of Richard Nixon

0:04:06.440 --> 0:04:09.360
<v Speaker 5>and a Watergate, even though that is predominantly remembered as

0:04:09.400 --> 0:04:12.160
<v Speaker 5>a political story, which it absolutely was. There's also a

0:04:12.160 --> 0:04:16.400
<v Speaker 5>story of rank corruption, especially corporate corruption, regarding linkages with

0:04:16.400 --> 0:04:18.800
<v Speaker 5>with the White House, and that's all true. Those are

0:04:18.839 --> 0:04:21.920
<v Speaker 5>all scandals under themselves. Of course, Teapot Dome for nearly

0:04:21.920 --> 0:04:24.919
<v Speaker 5>a century was kind of the shorthand for presidential corruption.

0:04:25.040 --> 0:04:27.920
<v Speaker 5>But what we we have seen over the last five

0:04:28.000 --> 0:04:30.680
<v Speaker 5>six months now, you know, it blows all of that

0:04:30.720 --> 0:04:33.240
<v Speaker 5>out of the water. There really is no historic comparison

0:04:33.240 --> 0:04:35.520
<v Speaker 5>for the scope, the scale, and of course the speed

0:04:35.560 --> 0:04:38.360
<v Speaker 5>with all with which all of this has happened itself.

0:04:38.400 --> 0:04:40.720
<v Speaker 5>And you can talk about specific incidents of it. You

0:04:40.760 --> 0:04:43.320
<v Speaker 5>can talk, of course about the Katari Jet, the forms

0:04:43.440 --> 0:04:47.480
<v Speaker 5>million dollar luxury liner gifted from a foreign dictatorship directly

0:04:47.520 --> 0:04:50.760
<v Speaker 5>to a sitting president. You can talk about the crypto

0:04:50.880 --> 0:04:53.040
<v Speaker 5>and the meme coins. Of course, you could talk about

0:04:53.040 --> 0:04:56.840
<v Speaker 5>the Trump organization itself. That's all perfectly true, that's all

0:04:56.839 --> 0:04:58.880
<v Speaker 5>beyond anything we've ever seen before. But you could also

0:04:58.880 --> 0:05:01.960
<v Speaker 5>talk about the policy developments on how the administration has

0:05:02.080 --> 0:05:06.000
<v Speaker 5>really taken an absolute sledgehammer to whatever kind of anti

0:05:06.080 --> 0:05:09.600
<v Speaker 5>corruption bona fides the US once had, you know, going

0:05:09.640 --> 0:05:11.279
<v Speaker 5>all the way back, maybe fifty years or so in

0:05:11.279 --> 0:05:13.599
<v Speaker 5>the post Watergate era is when you can really begin

0:05:13.680 --> 0:05:16.000
<v Speaker 5>to examine the rise of this kind of anti corruption

0:05:16.120 --> 0:05:19.799
<v Speaker 5>regime or these anti corruption policies. Almost all of those

0:05:20.080 --> 0:05:27.440
<v Speaker 5>have been completely decimated, either unenforced, completely dissolved in terms

0:05:27.440 --> 0:05:31.520
<v Speaker 5>of some task forces, no resourcing for actual investigations themselves.

0:05:31.520 --> 0:05:33.160
<v Speaker 5>And of course what we've seen take place at the

0:05:33.200 --> 0:05:36.680
<v Speaker 5>Department of Justice with the clear quid pro quo in

0:05:36.760 --> 0:05:39.760
<v Speaker 5>terms of dropping certain prosecutions, including against our beloved mayor

0:05:39.800 --> 0:05:43.240
<v Speaker 5>here in New York City, who was allegedly going around

0:05:43.279 --> 0:05:45.640
<v Speaker 5>the world, especially in places like Turkey and asking for

0:05:45.680 --> 0:05:48.599
<v Speaker 5>a campaign financing, which was of course the reddest of

0:05:48.640 --> 0:05:50.320
<v Speaker 5>red lines. I mean, Adam, look, I could talk to

0:05:50.320 --> 0:05:52.440
<v Speaker 5>you and maybe we will talk for a full hour

0:05:52.520 --> 0:05:54.520
<v Speaker 5>about all of the developments out of it. That is

0:05:54.560 --> 0:05:57.760
<v Speaker 5>sort of the plan that's about the Trump administration. But

0:05:58.279 --> 0:06:01.760
<v Speaker 5>it was it was an exercise in trying to get

0:06:01.839 --> 0:06:04.440
<v Speaker 5>all of this into one single article. I still left

0:06:05.080 --> 0:06:08.200
<v Speaker 5>plenty of material on the chopping block, right. I don't

0:06:08.200 --> 0:06:10.760
<v Speaker 5>think I mentioned once maybe I mentioned in passing the

0:06:10.839 --> 0:06:13.640
<v Speaker 5>role and relationships of Jared Kushner and the billions of

0:06:13.680 --> 0:06:16.520
<v Speaker 5>dollars that the president's son in law has brought in

0:06:16.560 --> 0:06:20.680
<v Speaker 5>from dictatorship after dictatorship, as far as anyone can tell,

0:06:21.040 --> 0:06:23.039
<v Speaker 5>only because he is, of course, the son in law

0:06:23.080 --> 0:06:25.160
<v Speaker 5>of a sitting president. I mean, that's just one figure

0:06:25.400 --> 0:06:27.720
<v Speaker 5>among many that I had to leave out of this article.

0:06:28.160 --> 0:06:30.839
<v Speaker 5>The list goes on and on and on.

0:06:30.839 --> 0:06:33.120
<v Speaker 4>One of the things you mentioned in that Atlantic piece

0:06:33.160 --> 0:06:36.400
<v Speaker 4>is the Foreign Corrupt Practice Act. Can you talk about

0:06:36.400 --> 0:06:40.599
<v Speaker 4>what that law is or was, and what it means

0:06:40.600 --> 0:06:42.840
<v Speaker 4>for the Trump administration to stop enforcing it.

0:06:43.560 --> 0:06:47.880
<v Speaker 5>The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, it's known by its acronym

0:06:47.880 --> 0:06:51.120
<v Speaker 5>the FCPA, and that's what I'll generally refer to it

0:06:51.640 --> 0:06:56.080
<v Speaker 5>as this was really the bedrock of America's anti corruption

0:06:56.839 --> 0:07:00.480
<v Speaker 5>statutes or policies going back nearly fifty years. You know,

0:07:00.560 --> 0:07:02.800
<v Speaker 5>I talked a moment ago about about Watergate. In the

0:07:02.800 --> 0:07:05.560
<v Speaker 5>aftermath of Watergate and the revelations they were in and again,

0:07:05.600 --> 0:07:09.120
<v Speaker 5>it wasn't just about about a burglar at the Watergate hotel.

0:07:09.160 --> 0:07:11.920
<v Speaker 5>It wasn't just about the links that Richard Nixon would

0:07:11.960 --> 0:07:15.840
<v Speaker 5>go to to remain in power as Congressional investigators discovered

0:07:15.840 --> 0:07:21.640
<v Speaker 5>there were any number of leading American corporations secretly bankrolling

0:07:21.720 --> 0:07:26.600
<v Speaker 5>Richard Nixon's re election campaign in nineteen seventy two. Again,

0:07:26.640 --> 0:07:30.080
<v Speaker 5>this was contravening all manner of campaign finance law back

0:07:30.120 --> 0:07:33.160
<v Speaker 5>in the nineteen seventies. But it wasn't just that. It

0:07:33.200 --> 0:07:35.360
<v Speaker 5>was also that many of these companies were going around

0:07:35.400 --> 0:07:40.080
<v Speaker 5>the world and bribing corrupt officials in places like Japan

0:07:40.200 --> 0:07:43.440
<v Speaker 5>and South Korea, places like the Netherlands, but also places

0:07:43.600 --> 0:07:48.600
<v Speaker 5>like Saudi Arabia, and finding corrupt regimes, corrupt officials that

0:07:48.640 --> 0:07:51.400
<v Speaker 5>they could pay off to open the doors for American

0:07:51.440 --> 0:07:54.520
<v Speaker 5>business and American commerce and of course keep those regimes

0:07:54.560 --> 0:07:58.560
<v Speaker 5>in power for as long as they wanted as well.

0:07:58.600 --> 0:08:01.440
<v Speaker 5>And when these revelations came out, right, we're talking tens

0:08:01.520 --> 0:08:04.600
<v Speaker 5>hundreds of millions of dollars, significant amounts of money. When

0:08:04.800 --> 0:08:07.680
<v Speaker 5>these revelations came out, you know, it wasn't just a

0:08:07.720 --> 0:08:10.440
<v Speaker 5>scandal that American companies are going around the world and bribing,

0:08:11.160 --> 0:08:14.280
<v Speaker 5>you know, autocratic regimes in places like Honduras. It is

0:08:14.440 --> 0:08:16.960
<v Speaker 5>also that when those revelations came out, all of a sudden,

0:08:17.120 --> 0:08:21.560
<v Speaker 5>all manner of anti American forces and political parties and

0:08:21.640 --> 0:08:24.720
<v Speaker 5>movements could point to those regimes and point to those

0:08:24.760 --> 0:08:27.600
<v Speaker 5>American companies and say, look at what is happening, Look

0:08:27.600 --> 0:08:29.600
<v Speaker 5>at what the US is doing, what it is allowing,

0:08:29.600 --> 0:08:31.320
<v Speaker 5>and look at what these American companies are doing in

0:08:31.400 --> 0:08:34.800
<v Speaker 5>terms of smothering any kind of democracy again, in places

0:08:34.800 --> 0:08:38.199
<v Speaker 5>like the military dictatorship South Korea, autocracy on Honduras, so

0:08:38.280 --> 0:08:41.240
<v Speaker 5>on and so on. It's funny I was rereading this

0:08:41.280 --> 0:08:43.560
<v Speaker 5>earlier this morning. Some of the congressional testimonies, some of

0:08:43.559 --> 0:08:47.920
<v Speaker 5>the biggest benefactors of all these revelations were things like

0:08:48.080 --> 0:08:51.240
<v Speaker 5>communist parties. Again, remember the nineteen seventies, near the height

0:08:51.320 --> 0:08:52.679
<v Speaker 5>of the Cold War, and all of a sudden, the

0:08:52.679 --> 0:08:55.520
<v Speaker 5>Communists can point to officials in Italy or the Netherlands

0:08:55.559 --> 0:08:57.320
<v Speaker 5>or wherever it is, and say, look at just how

0:08:57.360 --> 0:09:00.240
<v Speaker 5>corrupt the Americans and their lackeys in power here are.

0:09:00.600 --> 0:09:03.240
<v Speaker 5>So that's all kind of a long winded way of

0:09:03.240 --> 0:09:05.720
<v Speaker 5>setting the stage for what legislators ended up doing in

0:09:05.800 --> 0:09:09.680
<v Speaker 5>nineteen seventy seven, realizing just how damaging this was to

0:09:09.760 --> 0:09:13.719
<v Speaker 5>American policies and an American foreign policy especially, they passed this

0:09:13.760 --> 0:09:16.840
<v Speaker 5>thing called the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, which is really

0:09:17.760 --> 0:09:19.760
<v Speaker 5>I want to make sure to kind of convey just

0:09:19.800 --> 0:09:22.960
<v Speaker 5>how monumental this was. This wasn't just the first time

0:09:22.960 --> 0:09:25.160
<v Speaker 5>in American history that it was now a crime for

0:09:25.200 --> 0:09:29.680
<v Speaker 5>American corporations or American businessman to bribe foreign officials. This

0:09:29.880 --> 0:09:33.120
<v Speaker 5>was the first time anywhere had ever passed anything like this,

0:09:33.160 --> 0:09:35.960
<v Speaker 5>the first time in global history any country had made

0:09:35.960 --> 0:09:39.040
<v Speaker 5>it a crime to engage in bribery, not in that

0:09:39.120 --> 0:09:42.520
<v Speaker 5>country and specifically, but a foreign country in and of itself.

0:09:42.559 --> 0:09:45.000
<v Speaker 5>So again, what the FCPA does is it makes it

0:09:45.080 --> 0:09:48.480
<v Speaker 5>illegal for any American in any American company, any American

0:09:48.520 --> 0:09:51.800
<v Speaker 5>business person, or any foreign company that's listed on an

0:09:51.840 --> 0:09:56.200
<v Speaker 5>American stock exchange, even if they're not technically American companies themselves,

0:09:56.440 --> 0:10:01.320
<v Speaker 5>to engage in bribery abroad in any country around the world.

0:10:01.360 --> 0:10:04.320
<v Speaker 5>And this was nineteen seventy seven, This was nearly fifty

0:10:04.400 --> 0:10:06.760
<v Speaker 5>years ago. And that's really, again I used the term earlier,

0:10:06.760 --> 0:10:09.920
<v Speaker 5>the kind of the bedrock from where we saw over

0:10:09.960 --> 0:10:13.240
<v Speaker 5>the ensuing decades, all of these other anti corruption policies

0:10:13.280 --> 0:10:17.079
<v Speaker 5>really stem from that really declared American leadership in this space.

0:10:17.120 --> 0:10:20.040
<v Speaker 5>We eventually saw it replicated in places like Canada. The

0:10:20.040 --> 0:10:23.480
<v Speaker 5>European Union, United Kingdom, but also really set the kind

0:10:23.480 --> 0:10:26.840
<v Speaker 5>of the baseline for where American anti corruption policy would

0:10:26.840 --> 0:10:28.880
<v Speaker 5>go from there. So then eventually you had things like

0:10:28.960 --> 0:10:31.920
<v Speaker 5>Shell company transparency. Eventually you had things like new task

0:10:31.960 --> 0:10:35.840
<v Speaker 5>forces dedicated to targeting and seizing and returning dirty money.

0:10:35.880 --> 0:10:38.600
<v Speaker 5>Of course, you had the Department of Justice prosecuting all

0:10:38.600 --> 0:10:41.640
<v Speaker 5>around the world corrupt networks. Again, that was a long

0:10:41.640 --> 0:10:46.079
<v Speaker 5>winded way of saying the FCPA was wonderful, and technically

0:10:46.760 --> 0:10:49.160
<v Speaker 5>it is still on the books, but in one of

0:10:49.240 --> 0:10:52.040
<v Speaker 5>the very first things that Donald Trump did in returning

0:10:52.040 --> 0:10:55.720
<v Speaker 5>to the presidency was announced effectively it was no longer

0:10:55.800 --> 0:10:58.200
<v Speaker 5>going to be enforced. As he saw it, it was

0:10:58.280 --> 0:11:01.000
<v Speaker 5>a quote horror show of a law that prevented American

0:11:01.040 --> 0:11:06.520
<v Speaker 5>businesses from engaging in routine business practices abroad and damaging

0:11:06.520 --> 0:11:10.160
<v Speaker 5>American competitiveness, which is just a nice little euphemistic way

0:11:10.200 --> 0:11:13.319
<v Speaker 5>of saying American companies and American businessmen should be able

0:11:13.360 --> 0:11:17.560
<v Speaker 5>to bribe whoever they want without being concerned by without

0:11:17.600 --> 0:11:20.920
<v Speaker 5>being worried about prosecution from the Department of Justice. It

0:11:21.120 --> 0:11:26.040
<v Speaker 5>was devastating to see. It was a monumental, even generational setback.

0:11:26.720 --> 0:11:29.120
<v Speaker 5>The Silver lining is it's still on the books, and

0:11:29.120 --> 0:11:32.640
<v Speaker 5>a potential future administration could of course begin reinforcing it.

0:11:32.679 --> 0:11:36.280
<v Speaker 5>But it was a very clear sign of the direction

0:11:36.400 --> 0:11:37.880
<v Speaker 5>this administration was going to go in.

0:11:38.600 --> 0:11:44.280
<v Speaker 4>That raises an important distinction, which is the direction of travel,

0:11:44.440 --> 0:11:47.320
<v Speaker 4>the direction of corrupt travel? I guess which is The

0:11:47.440 --> 0:11:53.600
<v Speaker 4>FCPA focuses on American companies illegally or unlawfully or unethically

0:11:53.800 --> 0:11:58.000
<v Speaker 4>influencing governments around the world. Your book, Foreign Agents, which

0:11:58.000 --> 0:12:01.360
<v Speaker 4>we talked about last year, focuses on sort of the

0:12:01.400 --> 0:12:06.079
<v Speaker 4>reverse direction of corruption. Obviously it's all interrelated, but focuses

0:12:06.120 --> 0:12:14.160
<v Speaker 4>on the government's authoritarian regimes around the world hiring US officials, politicians,

0:12:14.600 --> 0:12:17.800
<v Speaker 4>influencers of various kinds who have access to the US

0:12:17.880 --> 0:12:22.560
<v Speaker 4>government and can shape American policy. What is the state

0:12:22.679 --> 0:12:26.400
<v Speaker 4>of the corrupt Union when it comes to foreign influence

0:12:26.480 --> 0:12:28.880
<v Speaker 4>on the United States?

0:12:29.520 --> 0:12:35.720
<v Speaker 5>The state of affairs right now is I don't know, terrible, terrifying, unsettling.

0:12:35.840 --> 0:12:38.160
<v Speaker 4>Yes, it depends if you are making money or not.

0:12:38.280 --> 0:12:40.800
<v Speaker 5>Oh sure, sure, it depends on what kind of line

0:12:40.800 --> 0:12:42.800
<v Speaker 5>of work you're in. And I suppose what kind of morals,

0:12:42.800 --> 0:12:45.120
<v Speaker 5>if any, you have about or scruples I should say

0:12:45.120 --> 0:12:47.880
<v Speaker 5>about working with some of those the most heinous regimes

0:12:47.920 --> 0:12:50.280
<v Speaker 5>around the world. Again, just as a little bit of context.

0:12:50.320 --> 0:12:52.280
<v Speaker 5>I know Adam and I spoke about this in the past.

0:12:52.800 --> 0:12:55.280
<v Speaker 5>In the United States of America, it's not illegal. It's

0:12:55.280 --> 0:12:58.000
<v Speaker 5>perfectly legal for you or I or any other American

0:12:58.080 --> 0:13:01.680
<v Speaker 5>to go lobby on behalf of not only any cause

0:13:01.760 --> 0:13:04.280
<v Speaker 5>that we want, but any regime that we want. You

0:13:04.320 --> 0:13:07.079
<v Speaker 5>and I can right now go talk to our legislators

0:13:07.080 --> 0:13:10.200
<v Speaker 5>about how actually wonderful the regime in Saudi Arabia or

0:13:10.240 --> 0:13:13.600
<v Speaker 5>the United Arab Emirates or Gabone or Venezuela or whatever

0:13:13.640 --> 0:13:17.400
<v Speaker 5>it is might be. That's predominant because in the First Amendment,

0:13:17.440 --> 0:13:19.559
<v Speaker 5>we have the right to petition the government for redress

0:13:19.559 --> 0:13:21.640
<v Speaker 5>of grievances, which is just an old timey way of

0:13:21.679 --> 0:13:24.319
<v Speaker 5>saying lobbying. You and I can go lobby for whatever

0:13:24.360 --> 0:13:27.880
<v Speaker 5>cause we want. That is not illegal. All Americans have

0:13:27.920 --> 0:13:31.480
<v Speaker 5>to do is register their work. If they're being paid

0:13:31.559 --> 0:13:33.720
<v Speaker 5>to do that by these foreign governments. They just have

0:13:33.760 --> 0:13:36.000
<v Speaker 5>to register with the Department of Justice and declare what

0:13:36.000 --> 0:13:38.320
<v Speaker 5>they're doing and disclose how much they're making and so

0:13:38.400 --> 0:13:40.800
<v Speaker 5>on and so forth. And you and I can go

0:13:40.840 --> 0:13:43.080
<v Speaker 5>online to the Department of Justice website and take a

0:13:43.080 --> 0:13:45.480
<v Speaker 5>look through that database of all of these American lobbyists

0:13:45.520 --> 0:13:49.400
<v Speaker 5>we're selling themselves to regime after regime around the world.

0:13:49.480 --> 0:13:51.520
<v Speaker 5>And again, as you just laid out, it's not even

0:13:51.600 --> 0:13:55.480
<v Speaker 5>just traditional lobbyists, right, these kind of traditional lobbying firms

0:13:55.480 --> 0:14:00.280
<v Speaker 5>in DC. It's a pr specialists, it's consultants, it's of

0:14:00.280 --> 0:14:03.800
<v Speaker 5>course many former members of Congress or of Cabinet or

0:14:03.800 --> 0:14:09.040
<v Speaker 5>previous administrations themselves. It is, you know, a whole kind

0:14:09.040 --> 0:14:12.760
<v Speaker 5>of constellation of American industries are now congealing within the

0:14:12.800 --> 0:14:17.400
<v Speaker 5>one broader umbrella industry of foreign lobbying. And because of

0:14:17.720 --> 0:14:20.480
<v Speaker 5>Donald Trump's first term, again, this is now a multi

0:14:20.480 --> 0:14:25.080
<v Speaker 5>billion dollar industry itself. These are extremely effective lobbyists. These

0:14:25.120 --> 0:14:28.760
<v Speaker 5>are extremely effective networks at implementing policies that these foreign

0:14:28.800 --> 0:14:31.600
<v Speaker 5>regimes want to see implemented. And again, it's things like

0:14:32.560 --> 0:14:35.760
<v Speaker 5>arms sales, it's things like the lifting or prevention of sanctions.

0:14:35.760 --> 0:14:38.080
<v Speaker 5>It's even things and we were talking about this off

0:14:38.120 --> 0:14:41.400
<v Speaker 5>my in terms of climate it's even things like fast

0:14:41.440 --> 0:14:47.560
<v Speaker 5>tracking energy policies that benefit hydrocarbon producers and pushing off

0:14:48.200 --> 0:14:52.760
<v Speaker 5>or gutting green or clean tech reforms that again, places

0:14:52.760 --> 0:14:56.040
<v Speaker 5>like China or Azerbaijan or Saudi Arabia, the major oil

0:14:56.040 --> 0:14:59.320
<v Speaker 5>producers do not want to see pursued. It's been extremely

0:14:59.360 --> 0:15:01.920
<v Speaker 5>effective because because of Donald Trump's first term, there was

0:15:02.040 --> 0:15:04.680
<v Speaker 5>kind of a rising salience about some of these threats

0:15:04.720 --> 0:15:07.320
<v Speaker 5>because it's not just that their lobbying officials. What a

0:15:07.360 --> 0:15:10.280
<v Speaker 5>lot of folks realized is that these lobbyists were really

0:15:10.640 --> 0:15:14.640
<v Speaker 5>enmeshing themselves in the highest levels of American policy making

0:15:14.680 --> 0:15:18.640
<v Speaker 5>in any ways, crafting American foreign policy that should have

0:15:18.680 --> 0:15:21.680
<v Speaker 5>been crafted by American legislators of those in the White House,

0:15:21.720 --> 0:15:25.320
<v Speaker 5>but instead was being directed by these foreign lobbyists themselves.

0:15:25.400 --> 0:15:29.360
<v Speaker 5>And Adam, I can't remember when you and I spoke last,

0:15:29.360 --> 0:15:32.320
<v Speaker 5>but I believe it was after, maybe right around the

0:15:32.320 --> 0:15:37.640
<v Speaker 5>same time as the conviction of former Senator Bob Menendez,

0:15:38.160 --> 0:15:42.360
<v Speaker 5>who was before his conviction, was the chairman of the

0:15:42.400 --> 0:15:46.160
<v Speaker 5>Senate Foreign Relations Committee, the most powerful member of American

0:15:46.200 --> 0:15:49.280
<v Speaker 5>Congress in terms of crafting American foreign policy.

0:15:48.920 --> 0:15:51.960
<v Speaker 4>And a Democrat, which bears emphasizing in this moment.

0:15:52.080 --> 0:15:54.080
<v Speaker 5>He is one of the leaders, was one of the

0:15:54.160 --> 0:15:58.040
<v Speaker 5>leaders for a long time of the Democratic Party, and

0:15:58.080 --> 0:16:03.040
<v Speaker 5>as we also learned recently was secretly moonlighting, conspiring to

0:16:03.160 --> 0:16:07.080
<v Speaker 5>act as as the jury found and guilty of a

0:16:07.200 --> 0:16:10.760
<v Speaker 5>foreign agent for the military dictatorship in Egypt. He was

0:16:10.800 --> 0:16:14.720
<v Speaker 5>secretly lobbying his colleagues in the Senate, secretly ghost riding

0:16:14.760 --> 0:16:18.720
<v Speaker 5>on behalf of his patrons back in Cairo. And he

0:16:18.800 --> 0:16:22.800
<v Speaker 5>was the first American member of Congress to be convicted

0:16:22.840 --> 0:16:25.800
<v Speaker 5>on these charges and was recently sentenced, And if I

0:16:25.880 --> 0:16:29.640
<v Speaker 5>remember correctly, he is actually now in prison on a

0:16:29.920 --> 0:16:33.760
<v Speaker 5>very lengthy stay for again acting as secretly a foreign

0:16:33.800 --> 0:16:37.680
<v Speaker 5>lobbyist on behalf of not his constituents back in New Jersey,

0:16:38.040 --> 0:16:41.480
<v Speaker 5>but the military dictatorship back in Egypt. So again, this

0:16:41.600 --> 0:16:43.160
<v Speaker 5>is just all kind of a little bit of the

0:16:43.160 --> 0:16:44.680
<v Speaker 5>scope and scale of what we see on the foreign

0:16:44.720 --> 0:16:47.440
<v Speaker 5>lobbying side. Fast forward to where we are right now,

0:16:47.480 --> 0:16:49.920
<v Speaker 5>the current administration saying, no, we're not going to enforce

0:16:49.960 --> 0:16:52.400
<v Speaker 5>any of these foreign lobbying laws. We're only going to

0:16:52.440 --> 0:16:56.200
<v Speaker 5>target those that are engaged in traditional espionage. If a

0:16:56.320 --> 0:17:00.520
<v Speaker 5>foreign agent, a foreign lobbyist is somehow somewhere getting a

0:17:00.520 --> 0:17:03.640
<v Speaker 5>hold of classified information and sending it back to their

0:17:03.680 --> 0:17:07.080
<v Speaker 5>patrons and benefactors elsewhere, we will prosecute that but if

0:17:07.080 --> 0:17:09.600
<v Speaker 5>they're not disclosing who they're working for, if they're not

0:17:09.640 --> 0:17:12.240
<v Speaker 5>sharing with the American public who's actually paying them, we're

0:17:12.240 --> 0:17:15.240
<v Speaker 5>not going to prosecute that whatsoever. So it really seems like,

0:17:15.359 --> 0:17:17.520
<v Speaker 5>and again it's going to take years to really figure

0:17:17.560 --> 0:17:20.320
<v Speaker 5>out the breadth of this. Very much seems like we're

0:17:20.359 --> 0:17:22.760
<v Speaker 5>back in the golden era, back in a golden age

0:17:23.000 --> 0:17:26.159
<v Speaker 5>of these kind of foreign lobbying network being able to

0:17:26.200 --> 0:17:28.240
<v Speaker 5>operate in the shadows without the rest of us having

0:17:28.280 --> 0:17:29.640
<v Speaker 5>any idea what they're actually doing.

0:17:30.040 --> 0:17:32.240
<v Speaker 4>I wanted to ask you about what the state of

0:17:32.320 --> 0:17:36.640
<v Speaker 4>the influence industry in Washington is right now, because, on

0:17:36.640 --> 0:17:40.760
<v Speaker 4>one hand, and as you just referenced, there's tons of

0:17:40.760 --> 0:17:46.600
<v Speaker 4>money to be made from foreign governments seeking influence sway

0:17:46.960 --> 0:17:50.399
<v Speaker 4>access to the Trump administration. What I wonder though, is,

0:17:50.640 --> 0:17:53.160
<v Speaker 4>on the other hand, is the fact that the administration

0:17:53.480 --> 0:17:56.280
<v Speaker 4>is so shameless in some ways, or the fact that

0:17:56.840 --> 0:17:59.439
<v Speaker 4>Trump himself is such a you know, as has been

0:17:59.440 --> 0:18:02.359
<v Speaker 4>widely report, or it makes decisions based on who talks

0:18:02.359 --> 0:18:04.679
<v Speaker 4>to him most recently, who flatters him the most, whatever.

0:18:05.160 --> 0:18:07.640
<v Speaker 4>Does that make it harder for some of the traditional

0:18:08.680 --> 0:18:12.080
<v Speaker 4>levers of influence in Washington to do their work, because

0:18:12.119 --> 0:18:15.439
<v Speaker 4>I feel like they at least sell themselves as having

0:18:15.520 --> 0:18:17.840
<v Speaker 4>access that the average person doesn't have. But if you

0:18:17.880 --> 0:18:20.880
<v Speaker 4>can get access to the decider through Fox News, then

0:18:21.359 --> 0:18:24.080
<v Speaker 4>does that mean you don't need to hire Brownstein or whomever.

0:18:24.480 --> 0:18:27.000
<v Speaker 5>You know. It's funny, Adam, and far be it from

0:18:27.000 --> 0:18:31.119
<v Speaker 5>me to feel any kind of bad about any of

0:18:31.119 --> 0:18:36.440
<v Speaker 5>these figures. But yes, there was even through Trump's first

0:18:36.520 --> 0:18:38.800
<v Speaker 5>term and certainly well into the by and earra, there

0:18:38.880 --> 0:18:42.919
<v Speaker 5>was a playbook that they had followed for years and

0:18:43.000 --> 0:18:46.120
<v Speaker 5>years and years for decades, and it was an extension

0:18:46.160 --> 0:18:49.120
<v Speaker 5>of an outgrowth of what traditional lobbying for domestic causes

0:18:49.680 --> 0:18:51.720
<v Speaker 5>looked like. Right. It was the kind of the back

0:18:51.800 --> 0:18:55.479
<v Speaker 5>room conversations. It was having one on one meetings. It

0:18:55.720 --> 0:19:00.080
<v Speaker 5>was in some cases donating directly to a young a

0:19:00.119 --> 0:19:03.879
<v Speaker 5>member of Congresses, or even a presidential candidate's election or

0:19:03.920 --> 0:19:07.199
<v Speaker 5>re election campaigns. I mean again, it's there was no

0:19:07.280 --> 0:19:10.119
<v Speaker 5>real kind of secret sauce to any of it. It

0:19:10.359 --> 0:19:12.359
<v Speaker 5>was about who you knew and who you could access

0:19:12.359 --> 0:19:13.840
<v Speaker 5>and what kind of doors you could open. And now

0:19:13.880 --> 0:19:16.400
<v Speaker 5>what we see with Donald Trump's second term is that

0:19:16.400 --> 0:19:20.119
<v Speaker 5>that playbook certainly still exists. And of course much of

0:19:20.160 --> 0:19:21.800
<v Speaker 5>it does come down to, at the end of the day,

0:19:21.840 --> 0:19:24.600
<v Speaker 5>who these figures, knowing what doors they can open. But

0:19:24.800 --> 0:19:30.359
<v Speaker 5>the range of tactics and tools now available has just

0:19:30.400 --> 0:19:33.520
<v Speaker 5>been blown out of the water, you know. Again, to

0:19:33.560 --> 0:19:35.120
<v Speaker 5>get back to what we were talking about a few

0:19:35.119 --> 0:19:37.840
<v Speaker 5>moments ago, I never in a thousand years thought I

0:19:37.840 --> 0:19:40.600
<v Speaker 5>would ever see the day that a foreign regime, in

0:19:40.600 --> 0:19:43.919
<v Speaker 5>this case out of Katar, would be able to gift

0:19:44.200 --> 0:19:48.720
<v Speaker 5>a four hundred million dollar luxury liner a airplane to

0:19:48.920 --> 0:19:51.520
<v Speaker 5>a sitting president. And yet, and yet here we are.

0:19:52.520 --> 0:19:54.600
<v Speaker 5>I never thought I would see a world in which

0:19:54.640 --> 0:19:59.280
<v Speaker 5>a sitting president has direct access to not only the

0:19:59.320 --> 0:20:02.760
<v Speaker 5>so called coins, but of course is more than willing

0:20:02.800 --> 0:20:05.159
<v Speaker 5>and more than happy to host these effective pay to

0:20:05.200 --> 0:20:09.480
<v Speaker 5>play dinners for both Americans and non Americans alike those

0:20:09.520 --> 0:20:12.800
<v Speaker 5>who have given or invested the most amount of money

0:20:12.920 --> 0:20:16.159
<v Speaker 5>in a specific crypto venture. And of course I never

0:20:16.200 --> 0:20:18.359
<v Speaker 5>thought that I would actually see I should have had

0:20:18.400 --> 0:20:20.080
<v Speaker 5>an idea with Trump's first term, but I never thought

0:20:20.080 --> 0:20:21.880
<v Speaker 5>I would actually see the day where he's sitting president

0:20:22.280 --> 0:20:25.199
<v Speaker 5>has his real estate company gallivanting around the world and

0:20:25.280 --> 0:20:30.160
<v Speaker 5>signing up deals in dictatorship after dictatorship, foreign country after

0:20:30.160 --> 0:20:32.679
<v Speaker 5>form coach. I mean, this is all just unprecedented and

0:20:32.720 --> 0:20:36.600
<v Speaker 5>completely uncharted waters, as we talked about earlier, completely without

0:20:36.600 --> 0:20:41.480
<v Speaker 5>any kind of historic precedent. And I don't know how

0:20:41.520 --> 0:20:45.800
<v Speaker 5>traditional lobbying firms are adapting, but I do think it

0:20:45.880 --> 0:20:48.520
<v Speaker 5>is indicative that one of the key figures that has

0:20:48.600 --> 0:20:50.680
<v Speaker 5>opened up Donald Trump to the world of crypto and

0:20:50.680 --> 0:20:54.840
<v Speaker 5>crypto related investments is someone who emerged from that traditional

0:20:54.880 --> 0:20:57.760
<v Speaker 5>lobbying world, and that is our old friend Paul Manifort,

0:20:57.840 --> 0:21:00.680
<v Speaker 5>who was Donald Trump's first campaign manager and sixteen helped

0:21:00.720 --> 0:21:03.879
<v Speaker 5>launch into the presidency, eventually jailed on foreign lobbying charges

0:21:03.920 --> 0:21:05.880
<v Speaker 5>and then pardoned by Trump, and now in the last

0:21:05.920 --> 0:21:08.840
<v Speaker 5>year or two has emerged as this key player in

0:21:08.880 --> 0:21:12.480
<v Speaker 5>the crypto space that we know from other reporting, has

0:21:12.800 --> 0:21:15.760
<v Speaker 5>led Donald Trump directly into that space and of course

0:21:15.800 --> 0:21:18.399
<v Speaker 5>opened up all manner of new areas of influence. So

0:21:18.440 --> 0:21:22.360
<v Speaker 5>there's a man of fort is many things, but there

0:21:22.440 --> 0:21:24.280
<v Speaker 5>is a certain skill set that he brings to bear

0:21:24.320 --> 0:21:26.640
<v Speaker 5>in terms in terms of opening up avenues of influence.

0:21:27.440 --> 0:21:30.560
<v Speaker 4>What are the currencies of influence these days? You mentioned

0:21:30.560 --> 0:21:32.919
<v Speaker 4>crypto being a big one. You know, there's been some

0:21:33.000 --> 0:21:36.959
<v Speaker 4>reporting about you know, the Saudi government, among others, really

0:21:37.000 --> 0:21:41.960
<v Speaker 4>going all in on AI and data centers to woo

0:21:42.280 --> 0:21:45.920
<v Speaker 4>the administration and its tech oligarch backers. But what are

0:21:46.119 --> 0:21:48.560
<v Speaker 4>how are they? What are they trafficking in these days?

0:21:49.440 --> 0:21:53.359
<v Speaker 5>Well, I mean, look at the barest element of explanation

0:21:53.680 --> 0:21:56.800
<v Speaker 5>is money, right, It's it's whatever means of financing directly

0:21:56.800 --> 0:22:00.600
<v Speaker 5>into the American president's pocket, his family's pockets, his business pockets,

0:22:01.000 --> 0:22:04.119
<v Speaker 5>his allies pockets. It's whatever the vehicle of value is.

0:22:04.200 --> 0:22:07.240
<v Speaker 5>And if that's opening up a new resort in Vietnam,

0:22:07.720 --> 0:22:10.119
<v Speaker 5>Trump Resort in Vietnam, so be it. If that is

0:22:10.440 --> 0:22:13.720
<v Speaker 5>spending three hundred million dollars or investing three hundred million

0:22:13.760 --> 0:22:16.000
<v Speaker 5>dollars on a Trump meme coin so you can have

0:22:16.000 --> 0:22:17.840
<v Speaker 5>dinner with the president, so be it. If that is

0:22:18.440 --> 0:22:21.080
<v Speaker 5>an investment fund in the United Arab Emirates agreeing that

0:22:21.119 --> 0:22:26.040
<v Speaker 5>it will exchange or participate in exchanges using that Trump

0:22:26.080 --> 0:22:29.520
<v Speaker 5>meme coin or whatever the other crypto venture is, you know,

0:22:29.600 --> 0:22:32.520
<v Speaker 5>so be it. I mean, it's funny that you mentioned AI.

0:22:32.600 --> 0:22:34.119
<v Speaker 5>This is actually a space. I don't think it's gotten

0:22:34.160 --> 0:22:37.880
<v Speaker 5>nearly enough attention, but because of not only not only

0:22:37.960 --> 0:22:40.159
<v Speaker 5>the developments in the space, and of itself and the

0:22:40.200 --> 0:22:45.960
<v Speaker 5>implications of either domestic or especially foreign investment in artificial intelligence.

0:22:46.000 --> 0:22:48.520
<v Speaker 5>But it's a very clear direction that especially the Saudi's

0:22:48.520 --> 0:22:51.399
<v Speaker 5>and the Emordies have gone in. And I don't remember

0:22:51.400 --> 0:22:52.840
<v Speaker 5>the figure, I don't have the figures off the top

0:22:52.880 --> 0:22:56.240
<v Speaker 5>of my head, but the most recent visit from or

0:22:56.280 --> 0:23:00.960
<v Speaker 5>agreement between President Trump and golf partners, hundreds of millions

0:23:00.960 --> 0:23:07.080
<v Speaker 5>of dollars in golf investment in artificial intelligence, opening up

0:23:07.080 --> 0:23:10.400
<v Speaker 5>of data centers, and of course providing leverage from these

0:23:10.440 --> 0:23:16.480
<v Speaker 5>regimes themselves over whether it's American AI companies themselves or

0:23:16.520 --> 0:23:23.200
<v Speaker 5>American AI policy writ large. Again, there's no admiration whatsoever,

0:23:23.280 --> 0:23:26.160
<v Speaker 5>but you do have to comment on the relative savvy

0:23:26.200 --> 0:23:29.560
<v Speaker 5>I suppose of figures like NBS in Saudi Arabia or

0:23:29.640 --> 0:23:32.520
<v Speaker 5>NBZ in the United Arab Emirates, realizing which way the

0:23:32.520 --> 0:23:34.760
<v Speaker 5>wind is blowing, and of course realizing that they are

0:23:34.800 --> 0:23:37.760
<v Speaker 5>all manner of tech oligarchs surrounding Donald Trump and his

0:23:37.800 --> 0:23:40.560
<v Speaker 5>presidency and more than willing to back him come hell

0:23:40.600 --> 0:23:42.920
<v Speaker 5>or high water, and then opening up these new streams

0:23:42.920 --> 0:23:46.960
<v Speaker 5>of investment from these dictatorships elsewhere. I mean, look, it's

0:23:47.000 --> 0:23:51.439
<v Speaker 5>all it's one investment vehicle after another. And it's funny,

0:23:51.440 --> 0:23:53.480
<v Speaker 5>I will say, you know you and I are speaking

0:23:53.480 --> 0:23:57.080
<v Speaker 5>here on July twenty second, and just yesterday the administration

0:23:57.200 --> 0:24:00.960
<v Speaker 5>announced that it is going to be, you know, charitably

0:24:01.119 --> 0:24:03.440
<v Speaker 5>kicking the can down the road about new anti money

0:24:03.520 --> 0:24:07.240
<v Speaker 5>laundering rules and regulations for American private equity and venture

0:24:07.280 --> 0:24:11.399
<v Speaker 5>capital and hedge funds. These were anti minor learning policies

0:24:11.400 --> 0:24:13.040
<v Speaker 5>that were supposed to be implemented back in the early

0:24:13.080 --> 0:24:16.360
<v Speaker 5>two thousands, but because of a so called temporary loophole,

0:24:17.080 --> 0:24:20.320
<v Speaker 5>just have never been implemented. And the Biden administration announced

0:24:20.359 --> 0:24:24.680
<v Speaker 5>finally they were going to require these private investment funds

0:24:25.080 --> 0:24:28.600
<v Speaker 5>again that manage total trillions, if not tens of trillions

0:24:28.640 --> 0:24:30.960
<v Speaker 5>of dollars, to just check where that money is coming

0:24:31.000 --> 0:24:34.080
<v Speaker 5>from and flag any concerns for the American government, for

0:24:34.119 --> 0:24:38.080
<v Speaker 5>the federal government. What we saw yesterday is the new administration,

0:24:38.119 --> 0:24:40.560
<v Speaker 5>the Treasure Department announcing no, we're not going to pursue

0:24:40.560 --> 0:24:44.600
<v Speaker 5>those rules and regulations. We're going to open it up

0:24:44.600 --> 0:24:47.680
<v Speaker 5>for discussion. We're going to reconsider, and in the meantime,

0:24:47.880 --> 0:24:50.959
<v Speaker 5>all these private investment funds will be able to have

0:24:51.000 --> 0:24:54.000
<v Speaker 5>an absolute feast and open their doors to anyone and

0:24:54.119 --> 0:24:58.879
<v Speaker 5>everyone they want, foreign regimes, foreign oligarchs, proxies, what have you,

0:24:59.560 --> 0:25:01.639
<v Speaker 5>and acting all of that money and all of that

0:25:01.720 --> 0:25:05.320
<v Speaker 5>wealth into the American economy and throughout the American economy

0:25:05.320 --> 0:25:08.080
<v Speaker 5>without any kind of transparency, any kind of due diligence

0:25:08.119 --> 0:25:10.080
<v Speaker 5>in this whatsoever. And you know, we talked a moment

0:25:10.160 --> 0:25:14.800
<v Speaker 5>ago about Jared Kushner, and it's funny because you know,

0:25:14.880 --> 0:25:18.879
<v Speaker 5>he left the first administration without any private investment, private

0:25:18.920 --> 0:25:23.000
<v Speaker 5>equity experience whatsoever. He was a let's call it, struggling

0:25:23.080 --> 0:25:25.920
<v Speaker 5>real estate developer before he joined Trump's first White House.

0:25:26.160 --> 0:25:30.600
<v Speaker 5>And then he left and almost immediately began taking in

0:25:30.760 --> 0:25:33.440
<v Speaker 5>billions of dollars for his own private investment fund from

0:25:33.440 --> 0:25:37.720
<v Speaker 5>the Saudis, from the Emiraldis, from the Kataris, without any

0:25:37.800 --> 0:25:40.240
<v Speaker 5>kind of experience, any kind of reason to believe that

0:25:40.280 --> 0:25:43.119
<v Speaker 5>those investments would be successful in terms of returning capital

0:25:43.160 --> 0:25:47.720
<v Speaker 5>back to those regimes. But you know, I don't want

0:25:47.720 --> 0:25:50.120
<v Speaker 5>to cast dispersions, but it certainly looks like it's going

0:25:50.119 --> 0:25:52.600
<v Speaker 5>in one direction in terms of influence and in terms

0:25:52.600 --> 0:25:55.120
<v Speaker 5>of access to the man that is now the son

0:25:55.160 --> 0:25:57.280
<v Speaker 5>in law of the city President. And again that's just

0:25:57.320 --> 0:26:00.760
<v Speaker 5>one figure and one fund on the private investment site,

0:26:00.760 --> 0:26:04.359
<v Speaker 5>among a whole slew of others that are still open

0:26:04.359 --> 0:26:05.840
<v Speaker 5>and available to anyone and everyone.

0:26:07.200 --> 0:26:10.840
<v Speaker 4>It is remarkable how much money these regimes have access

0:26:10.840 --> 0:26:13.320
<v Speaker 4>to and how desperate they seem to be defined anywhere

0:26:13.359 --> 0:26:17.040
<v Speaker 4>to invest it. And most of it comes from oil,

0:26:17.440 --> 0:26:21.159
<v Speaker 4>which I think is not new in the sense that

0:26:21.200 --> 0:26:26.520
<v Speaker 4>it's not breaking news, but also bears emphasizing given some

0:26:26.600 --> 0:26:29.480
<v Speaker 4>of these regimes at the same time at least are

0:26:30.119 --> 0:26:35.720
<v Speaker 4>maintaining the facade of transitioning their economies and participating in

0:26:35.880 --> 0:26:40.480
<v Speaker 4>global climate negotiations, transitioning their economies away from oil. But

0:26:40.560 --> 0:26:43.880
<v Speaker 4>at the same time, all of this money is related

0:26:43.880 --> 0:26:48.159
<v Speaker 4>to the extraction and production of fossil fuels, and it

0:26:48.240 --> 0:26:51.520
<v Speaker 4>finally has somewhere to go. I'd be curious what you

0:26:51.520 --> 0:26:54.920
<v Speaker 4>think of this. It seems like any reason for which

0:26:55.119 --> 0:26:59.040
<v Speaker 4>a Western investor or investment fund manager might have had

0:26:59.160 --> 0:27:02.359
<v Speaker 4>for not a accepting that money, any any compunction, I

0:27:02.359 --> 0:27:04.719
<v Speaker 4>guess is the word no longer exists. Is that a

0:27:04.720 --> 0:27:08.119
<v Speaker 4>fair way to put it. There's really no shame associated

0:27:08.200 --> 0:27:09.560
<v Speaker 4>with taking that money anymore.

0:27:10.119 --> 0:27:12.920
<v Speaker 5>No, No, there's no shame. There's no compunction there's no reason,

0:27:12.960 --> 0:27:15.760
<v Speaker 5>and then there's no even structural incentive to say no,

0:27:15.840 --> 0:27:19.520
<v Speaker 5>not only because you know, you should have extremely minimal

0:27:19.560 --> 0:27:22.440
<v Speaker 5>concern about any kind of investigation or prosecution so long

0:27:22.440 --> 0:27:25.720
<v Speaker 5>as you remain in the current administration's good graces, but

0:27:25.800 --> 0:27:27.760
<v Speaker 5>also because you know if you if you do say no,

0:27:28.160 --> 0:27:31.000
<v Speaker 5>then your competitor down the street will say yes, or

0:27:31.000 --> 0:27:33.640
<v Speaker 5>if they don't say yes, and some other competitor will

0:27:33.680 --> 0:27:35.480
<v Speaker 5>end up opening their doors. And again, this is a

0:27:35.560 --> 0:27:38.080
<v Speaker 5>dynamic we have seen elsewhere. It's a dynamic that does

0:27:38.160 --> 0:27:40.200
<v Speaker 5>predate the current president. It's something that we saw in

0:27:40.240 --> 0:27:42.080
<v Speaker 5>the lobbying industry or at large. It's something that we

0:27:42.119 --> 0:27:46.119
<v Speaker 5>saw in the consulting industry, in particular in working with

0:27:46.160 --> 0:27:49.439
<v Speaker 5>regimes like Saudi Arabia. It's I know, you could you

0:27:49.480 --> 0:27:52.280
<v Speaker 5>can look at, you know, oil producing regime after oil

0:27:52.280 --> 0:27:54.399
<v Speaker 5>producing regime around the world. You can look at Russia,

0:27:54.400 --> 0:27:56.479
<v Speaker 5>you can look at Equatorial Guinea, you can look at Libya,

0:27:56.720 --> 0:27:59.080
<v Speaker 5>you can certainly look at Azerbaijan or Kazakhstan. But of

0:27:59.080 --> 0:28:01.439
<v Speaker 5>course the one that we mentioned already a few times

0:28:01.840 --> 0:28:05.960
<v Speaker 5>is Saudi Arabia. It is a breathtaking and I hope

0:28:05.960 --> 0:28:08.080
<v Speaker 5>there are multiple books coming out about it in the

0:28:08.200 --> 0:28:12.120
<v Speaker 5>very near future to see the scope and the breadth

0:28:12.520 --> 0:28:16.480
<v Speaker 5>of opportunities that Saudi Arabia's Sovereign Wealth Fund has opened

0:28:16.560 --> 0:28:18.800
<v Speaker 5>up for the regime, and of course almost all of

0:28:18.800 --> 0:28:20.560
<v Speaker 5>that money, if not all of it, coming from the

0:28:20.600 --> 0:28:26.880
<v Speaker 5>production of oil and the broader climate destruction therein. Because

0:28:26.920 --> 0:28:29.520
<v Speaker 5>it's funny, because if you go back to twenty eighteen,

0:28:29.600 --> 0:28:35.119
<v Speaker 5>twenty nineteen, after the assassination of the journalist Jamalkashoci, Saudi

0:28:35.160 --> 0:28:39.720
<v Speaker 5>Arabia and MBS in particular, they weren't exactly persona non grata,

0:28:40.520 --> 0:28:45.120
<v Speaker 5>but they were having lobbying clients, consulting clients, even investors

0:28:45.160 --> 0:28:47.560
<v Speaker 5>in Silicon Valley and elsewhere in the US turn them

0:28:47.560 --> 0:28:50.000
<v Speaker 5>away and turn them down and say we will not

0:28:50.040 --> 0:28:51.800
<v Speaker 5>have any business, we will not be seen to be

0:28:51.800 --> 0:28:54.600
<v Speaker 5>doing any business with this regime. And again, you want

0:28:54.640 --> 0:28:57.680
<v Speaker 5>to talk about the past being a foreign country, and

0:28:57.760 --> 0:29:01.680
<v Speaker 5>that was only six seven years ago. I can't even

0:29:01.760 --> 0:29:03.880
<v Speaker 5>fathom getting to that point again. I have no idea

0:29:04.200 --> 0:29:07.320
<v Speaker 5>that the Saudi regime would have to do to get

0:29:07.320 --> 0:29:10.800
<v Speaker 5>to that point once more, where American lobbying shops, American

0:29:10.840 --> 0:29:13.640
<v Speaker 5>investors are turning down Saudi money because you know, you

0:29:14.680 --> 0:29:19.400
<v Speaker 5>can just cast around the American economy, whether it's in Hollywood,

0:29:19.400 --> 0:29:22.040
<v Speaker 5>whether it is in the sports industry, especially things like

0:29:22.040 --> 0:29:25.600
<v Speaker 5>golf or tennis or boxing. I'm sure at some point

0:29:25.640 --> 0:29:27.760
<v Speaker 5>down the line, the NBA and the NFL will be

0:29:27.800 --> 0:29:31.000
<v Speaker 5>opening themselves up to Saudi money. I hope to god

0:29:31.040 --> 0:29:33.720
<v Speaker 5>it's not my beloved Portland Trailblazers who are currently for

0:29:34.160 --> 0:29:36.600
<v Speaker 5>sale and I live in dread that the Saudis will

0:29:36.640 --> 0:29:38.960
<v Speaker 5>be the one to purchase them, or or of course

0:29:39.720 --> 0:29:44.200
<v Speaker 5>again all of the image management shops or even things

0:29:44.200 --> 0:29:47.440
<v Speaker 5>like Twitter or x Right. You know, it's just a

0:29:47.440 --> 0:29:50.760
<v Speaker 5>bottomless list of industries that have opened themselves up to

0:29:50.960 --> 0:29:55.360
<v Speaker 5>investments from the regime or open themselves up to the

0:29:55.360 --> 0:29:58.160
<v Speaker 5>private investment the private equity, hedge fund and venture capital

0:29:58.200 --> 0:30:02.440
<v Speaker 5>firms that have opened themselves to with to Saudi financing itself.

0:30:02.560 --> 0:30:04.800
<v Speaker 5>And again it's not just Kushner, it's the Injuries and

0:30:04.840 --> 0:30:07.200
<v Speaker 5>Horowitzes of the world. I mean, it really is the

0:30:07.240 --> 0:30:11.320
<v Speaker 5>biggest names across industry after industry that are now being

0:30:11.600 --> 0:30:14.520
<v Speaker 5>bankrolled directly by or at least indirectly via these private

0:30:14.560 --> 0:30:19.040
<v Speaker 5>investment funds. Saudi wealth, that oil money, that the Saudis

0:30:19.080 --> 0:30:20.720
<v Speaker 5>now have and I think they're going to pass the

0:30:20.720 --> 0:30:23.520
<v Speaker 5>one trillion mark shortly, if they haven't already for the

0:30:23.520 --> 0:30:25.880
<v Speaker 5>private investment fund. And again, this is just one regime

0:30:26.040 --> 0:30:29.520
<v Speaker 5>of many that are realizing. Oh, in the United States

0:30:29.560 --> 0:30:32.440
<v Speaker 5>of America, it is now the golden era of white

0:30:32.440 --> 0:30:36.200
<v Speaker 5>collar crime, right. The crime wave is here. It is

0:30:36.320 --> 0:30:39.640
<v Speaker 5>just white collar, as another writer, Jacob Silverman wrote in

0:30:39.640 --> 0:30:43.360
<v Speaker 5>his new book, and it's not going to end anytime soon.

0:30:44.040 --> 0:30:47.320
<v Speaker 4>That gets at the thing that seems most profound in

0:30:47.320 --> 0:30:50.280
<v Speaker 4>some ways. There's obviously the scale of the literal corruption

0:30:50.600 --> 0:30:53.240
<v Speaker 4>as we've talked about, but there's also just the sense

0:30:53.280 --> 0:30:55.360
<v Speaker 4>of shame that used to be associated with it. And

0:30:55.720 --> 0:30:58.400
<v Speaker 4>this comes to mind when you mentioned the years following

0:30:58.440 --> 0:31:01.040
<v Speaker 4>the murder of Jamal Kaschogi, and there was at least

0:31:01.040 --> 0:31:05.640
<v Speaker 4>a pretense that companies were turning away from doing business

0:31:05.640 --> 0:31:09.520
<v Speaker 4>with a regime that would murder journalists. That was, there

0:31:09.560 --> 0:31:12.400
<v Speaker 4>was always an element of performance there, because they were

0:31:12.440 --> 0:31:15.160
<v Speaker 4>clearly hungry for that money and got back in as

0:31:15.160 --> 0:31:18.960
<v Speaker 4>soon as they could. But what feels different about the

0:31:19.040 --> 0:31:21.680
<v Speaker 4>last certainly the last six months, but even the last

0:31:21.680 --> 0:31:26.200
<v Speaker 4>couple of years, is just how quickly that pretense has faded,

0:31:26.400 --> 0:31:28.680
<v Speaker 4>or at least the sense that they need to keep

0:31:28.760 --> 0:31:32.400
<v Speaker 4>up that performance, and there's just been sort of a

0:31:32.400 --> 0:31:36.040
<v Speaker 4>collective shrug in some ways because it's just too much,

0:31:36.960 --> 0:31:39.320
<v Speaker 4>And I wonder what you make of that.

0:31:39.800 --> 0:31:43.120
<v Speaker 5>You know, again, charitably, if you just pull back and

0:31:43.160 --> 0:31:46.800
<v Speaker 5>examine the kind of incentive structures that these firms, these

0:31:46.840 --> 0:31:51.160
<v Speaker 5>industries written large or are engaging in, you know, there

0:31:51.360 --> 0:31:55.240
<v Speaker 5>is a reality that if they have a fiduciary responsibility

0:31:55.280 --> 0:31:57.720
<v Speaker 5>to shareholders, or if they just have any kind of

0:31:57.760 --> 0:32:01.760
<v Speaker 5>general profit driven motive, yes, orls are great. But if

0:32:01.760 --> 0:32:03.560
<v Speaker 5>you're not committing any crime and you don't have to

0:32:03.560 --> 0:32:05.880
<v Speaker 5>be concerned about any prosecution, then all you're doing is

0:32:05.960 --> 0:32:09.440
<v Speaker 5>seeding ground to your competitors who have fewer scruples in you,

0:32:09.560 --> 0:32:11.480
<v Speaker 5>or maybe who knows, maybe they have just as many

0:32:11.480 --> 0:32:14.800
<v Speaker 5>scruples as you, but also can read the landscape and

0:32:14.840 --> 0:32:16.960
<v Speaker 5>realize that if they don't do this, they don't make

0:32:17.040 --> 0:32:20.880
<v Speaker 5>that kind of first mover step, then someone else will.

0:32:21.800 --> 0:32:23.520
<v Speaker 5>And you know, you can look at this from a

0:32:23.560 --> 0:32:25.680
<v Speaker 5>lot of different different vantages. You can look at this

0:32:25.720 --> 0:32:29.280
<v Speaker 5>from the perspective of, you know, people who are hired

0:32:29.760 --> 0:32:33.320
<v Speaker 5>as as representatives of these regimes, saying, oh, you know,

0:32:33.600 --> 0:32:36.760
<v Speaker 5>I'm actually a good guy. I'm gonna put this money

0:32:36.760 --> 0:32:39.040
<v Speaker 5>to good use. And of course if I'm inside the

0:32:39.080 --> 0:32:41.160
<v Speaker 5>tent rather than outside, it can make more of a difference.

0:32:41.880 --> 0:32:44.440
<v Speaker 5>You can look at it geopolitically. I remember, of course,

0:32:44.680 --> 0:32:46.920
<v Speaker 5>I guess he was then a candidate, Joe Biden saying

0:32:46.920 --> 0:32:50.160
<v Speaker 5>we're going to make Saudi Arabia parian nation, pariah's status.

0:32:50.800 --> 0:32:53.040
<v Speaker 5>And it was what two months, three months in his

0:32:53.080 --> 0:32:56.160
<v Speaker 5>first term where he's there fist bumping MBS itself.

0:32:55.800 --> 0:32:57.680
<v Speaker 3>And asking for more oil production.

0:32:57.480 --> 0:32:59.840
<v Speaker 5>And asking from oil production. Of course, the American Saudi

0:32:59.840 --> 0:33:04.200
<v Speaker 5>partnership has decades and decades behind it at this point.

0:33:05.080 --> 0:33:06.480
<v Speaker 5>And I will say, you know, it's funny, and I

0:33:06.520 --> 0:33:08.160
<v Speaker 5>don't remember if we talked about this last time, but

0:33:08.200 --> 0:33:11.600
<v Speaker 5>there's a chapter of the book of the Foreign Agents

0:33:11.600 --> 0:33:13.880
<v Speaker 5>Book which quotes one of these lobbyists from back in

0:33:13.920 --> 0:33:19.560
<v Speaker 5>the early nineteen nineties who was working for people like

0:33:19.600 --> 0:33:24.080
<v Speaker 5>Saddam Hussein or the vin dictator in places like Liberia,

0:33:24.240 --> 0:33:27.880
<v Speaker 5>I mean, truly the world's worst. And someone asked him

0:33:27.880 --> 0:33:29.959
<v Speaker 5>about it, you know, he said, well, look, it's at

0:33:29.960 --> 0:33:32.840
<v Speaker 5>the end of the day, it's just money and as

0:33:32.880 --> 0:33:36.720
<v Speaker 5>he said, shame is for sissies. That was his quote,

0:33:36.800 --> 0:33:38.760
<v Speaker 5>and that's what ended up being one of the chapter titles.

0:33:38.800 --> 0:33:42.120
<v Speaker 5>And I think that is an ethos that was maybe

0:33:42.160 --> 0:33:44.960
<v Speaker 5>a little ahead of its time, because that is certainly

0:33:44.960 --> 0:33:47.959
<v Speaker 5>something that we see every single day. I mean, there

0:33:48.000 --> 0:33:52.400
<v Speaker 5>is no if there ever was space for or consideration

0:33:52.560 --> 0:33:57.320
<v Speaker 5>of something like shame every day. It appears an outdated

0:33:57.520 --> 0:34:02.560
<v Speaker 5>phenomenon and term. And that's too bad, because shame can

0:34:02.600 --> 0:34:04.600
<v Speaker 5>be a wonderful tool in the right hands.

0:34:04.720 --> 0:34:07.120
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, sometimes the only tool we have too.

0:34:07.400 --> 0:34:09.880
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it is funny because this is what does The

0:34:10.920 --> 0:34:13.480
<v Speaker 5>kind of ethos of the first four lobbying regulations was, Look,

0:34:13.520 --> 0:34:15.160
<v Speaker 5>we're not going to ban this. This is all the

0:34:15.200 --> 0:34:17.760
<v Speaker 5>way back in the nineteen thirties when they were exposed

0:34:17.760 --> 0:34:20.480
<v Speaker 5>as working for the Nazis and the Soviets and Mussolini.

0:34:21.040 --> 0:34:23.640
<v Speaker 5>We can't ban this, but if we bring it to light,

0:34:23.719 --> 0:34:27.440
<v Speaker 5>bring some transparency, we can shame these Americans into no

0:34:27.520 --> 0:34:33.279
<v Speaker 5>longer working with these regimes. And rarely has that worked. Again,

0:34:33.320 --> 0:34:35.400
<v Speaker 5>It's one thing that's been very nice in theory, but

0:34:35.440 --> 0:34:37.680
<v Speaker 5>when you talk about the kind of money involved in practice,

0:34:37.719 --> 0:34:38.839
<v Speaker 5>it is very rare.

0:34:39.800 --> 0:34:42.279
<v Speaker 4>I wanted to ask you, and this might be a

0:34:42.320 --> 0:34:45.400
<v Speaker 4>hot take that's not worth taking, but it's not a

0:34:45.480 --> 0:34:47.680
<v Speaker 4>leading question. I'm genuinely curious what you think. If there's

0:34:48.360 --> 0:34:52.480
<v Speaker 4>anything to be celebrated is too strong of a word,

0:34:53.719 --> 0:34:55.840
<v Speaker 4>if there is a silver lining of some kind in

0:34:55.880 --> 0:34:58.520
<v Speaker 4>the sense that the Trump regime is doing a lot

0:34:58.520 --> 0:35:03.279
<v Speaker 4>of this stuff so clumsily and shamelessly and publicly, and

0:35:03.360 --> 0:35:05.000
<v Speaker 4>a lot of this stuff has been going on again

0:35:05.040 --> 0:35:07.759
<v Speaker 4>to a lesser extent, but as you've pointed out in

0:35:07.800 --> 0:35:10.920
<v Speaker 4>the book, and as we've talked about previously, has been

0:35:10.920 --> 0:35:13.840
<v Speaker 4>going on for decades. Just now it's happening in the

0:35:13.960 --> 0:35:17.759
<v Speaker 4>open because there's no sense of consequence or shame associated

0:35:17.760 --> 0:35:20.160
<v Speaker 4>with it. Is there anything to be celebrated about that

0:35:20.200 --> 0:35:24.400
<v Speaker 4>fact that people can actually see what's sort of always happened.

0:35:25.040 --> 0:35:26.960
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean the silver lining is it's impossible to

0:35:27.080 --> 0:35:30.520
<v Speaker 5>escape this. You cannot push it away, as there in

0:35:30.560 --> 0:35:33.600
<v Speaker 5>your news feed every single day. It is overwhelming, It

0:35:33.680 --> 0:35:37.560
<v Speaker 5>is breathtaking, and it forces you to consider, how is

0:35:37.600 --> 0:35:39.200
<v Speaker 5>it that this is happening? Why is it that this

0:35:39.239 --> 0:35:42.320
<v Speaker 5>is happening? And of course the secondary question is, okay, well,

0:35:43.200 --> 0:35:47.759
<v Speaker 5>if these policies were in place before Trump and he

0:35:47.800 --> 0:35:51.600
<v Speaker 5>can simply use them through his advantage or trample them underfoot.

0:35:51.600 --> 0:35:54.759
<v Speaker 5>What does that mean for a potential future administration if

0:35:54.760 --> 0:35:57.960
<v Speaker 5>we do want to shore up if we can possibly

0:35:58.000 --> 0:36:02.880
<v Speaker 5>shore up America's kind of anti corruption, counter cryptocracy regime itself.

0:36:02.880 --> 0:36:05.399
<v Speaker 5>And it's funny because I'm working on. The next book

0:36:05.400 --> 0:36:07.120
<v Speaker 5>that I'm working on is looking at the rise of

0:36:07.120 --> 0:36:10.120
<v Speaker 5>this oligarchic class in the United States of America and

0:36:10.160 --> 0:36:12.840
<v Speaker 5>how that oligarchic class is transformed into not only threats

0:36:12.840 --> 0:36:16.360
<v Speaker 5>domestically in terms of American democracy, but also begun allying

0:36:16.400 --> 0:36:19.400
<v Speaker 5>with foreign regimes themselves that have no interest in restoring

0:36:19.680 --> 0:36:22.960
<v Speaker 5>things as simple as American democracy. And one of the

0:36:22.960 --> 0:36:24.600
<v Speaker 5>things that I'm hoping to do with this book is

0:36:24.760 --> 0:36:28.120
<v Speaker 5>examine the kind of lessons and the periods of previous

0:36:28.160 --> 0:36:32.320
<v Speaker 5>successful reforms. There's two primary ones. There's the nineteen hundred

0:36:32.320 --> 0:36:35.600
<v Speaker 5>and nineteen ten broader progressive era really linked to the

0:36:35.600 --> 0:36:39.440
<v Speaker 5>Teddy Roosevelt administration. There were other, of course, players involved,

0:36:39.440 --> 0:36:41.359
<v Speaker 5>and that was the aftermath of the Gilded Age, which

0:36:41.440 --> 0:36:43.560
<v Speaker 5>is the first kind of really true oligarchic class and

0:36:43.560 --> 0:36:45.800
<v Speaker 5>the kind of threats they are in and that resulted

0:36:45.840 --> 0:36:49.480
<v Speaker 5>in all kinds of things, right, successful prosecutions of course, antitrust,

0:36:50.520 --> 0:36:54.560
<v Speaker 5>mobilization and crackdowns, but also campaign finance reforms, because there's

0:36:54.560 --> 0:36:55.960
<v Speaker 5>one thing that we haven't talked about yet today, and

0:36:55.960 --> 0:36:59.319
<v Speaker 5>that's campaign finance and the role and legacy of things

0:36:59.400 --> 0:37:03.240
<v Speaker 5>like Citizens United in further distorting and in many ways

0:37:03.239 --> 0:37:06.840
<v Speaker 5>i mean degrading, maybe not quite destroying this to the

0:37:06.880 --> 0:37:10.040
<v Speaker 5>point yet American democracy, but really taking again a sledgehammer

0:37:10.080 --> 0:37:12.960
<v Speaker 5>to any kind of sanctity or sovereignty of American democracy.

0:37:13.000 --> 0:37:15.000
<v Speaker 5>You go back to the progressive era and minds of

0:37:15.040 --> 0:37:16.920
<v Speaker 5>lessons there. And then the other one we've already talked about,

0:37:17.040 --> 0:37:18.920
<v Speaker 5>which is the post Watergate era, and that was the

0:37:19.040 --> 0:37:22.520
<v Speaker 5>creation not only the FCPA, but even the Federal Election Commission,

0:37:22.560 --> 0:37:25.520
<v Speaker 5>which is again one of those things that on paper

0:37:25.520 --> 0:37:28.200
<v Speaker 5>it looks like it would have been fantastic but very

0:37:28.320 --> 0:37:30.320
<v Speaker 5>quickly fell apart. And what kind of lessons can we

0:37:30.440 --> 0:37:36.640
<v Speaker 5>mind therein So, yes, it's a silver lining. And it's

0:37:37.400 --> 0:37:39.279
<v Speaker 5>tough to see those silver linings when you're in the

0:37:39.280 --> 0:37:42.399
<v Speaker 5>middle of such a dark cloud as this one. But yeah,

0:37:42.440 --> 0:37:45.120
<v Speaker 5>if you get your binoculars and you appear pretty far,

0:37:45.239 --> 0:37:46.680
<v Speaker 5>sure you can see it out there.

0:37:47.320 --> 0:37:49.799
<v Speaker 4>One of the things we talked about last time was

0:37:49.840 --> 0:37:54.359
<v Speaker 4>the bipartisan history of foreign influence pedaling, and we had

0:37:54.360 --> 0:37:58.480
<v Speaker 4>talked about how weirdly one of the good, positive, small

0:37:58.520 --> 0:38:01.520
<v Speaker 4>baby steps that the Trump administration, the first one, had taken,

0:38:02.480 --> 0:38:07.480
<v Speaker 4>was requiring disclosure of foreign funding for US universities and

0:38:07.719 --> 0:38:10.120
<v Speaker 4>US think tanks, and how the Biden administration had essentially

0:38:10.160 --> 0:38:14.000
<v Speaker 4>stopped enforcing that. Have there been any developments on either

0:38:14.040 --> 0:38:18.160
<v Speaker 4>of those fronts since No.

0:38:18.200 --> 0:38:23.319
<v Speaker 5>Next question this is, Look, there's plenty of disappointing things

0:38:23.320 --> 0:38:25.319
<v Speaker 5>to see in the past few months, and one of

0:38:25.320 --> 0:38:28.040
<v Speaker 5>them is this inability to build on even these small

0:38:28.120 --> 0:38:31.319
<v Speaker 5>victories we have seen. No, there has not been any

0:38:31.600 --> 0:38:35.560
<v Speaker 5>progress in terms of think tank disclosure and in terms

0:38:35.560 --> 0:38:38.640
<v Speaker 5>of university disclosure. Not that that can't change. I wouldn't

0:38:38.640 --> 0:38:42.360
<v Speaker 5>be surprised if we see increasing investigations and transparency requirements

0:38:42.400 --> 0:38:45.880
<v Speaker 5>for American universities. Perhaps not for the best reasons, but

0:38:46.000 --> 0:38:48.239
<v Speaker 5>I don't know, because one of the things that the

0:38:48.400 --> 0:38:51.400
<v Speaker 5>Trump administration wants to do is completely abolished the Department

0:38:51.440 --> 0:38:54.040
<v Speaker 5>of Education, which is the one that houses all of

0:38:54.040 --> 0:38:57.000
<v Speaker 5>the transparency data about how American universities have been taking

0:38:57.080 --> 0:39:00.000
<v Speaker 5>in tens of millions, hundreds of millions in some cases

0:39:00.080 --> 0:39:02.920
<v Speaker 5>billions of dollars from authoritarian regimes around the world in

0:39:02.960 --> 0:39:06.279
<v Speaker 5>terms of gifts and contracts, And if they eliminate the

0:39:06.320 --> 0:39:08.960
<v Speaker 5>Department of Education, then that goes out out the window.

0:39:09.239 --> 0:39:12.480
<v Speaker 5>So yeah, sorry, Adam, I don't have good news.

0:39:12.800 --> 0:39:17.480
<v Speaker 4>Well here's here's more shot at finding good news. Was

0:39:17.480 --> 0:39:20.719
<v Speaker 4>a headline or some reporting that the Wall Street Journal

0:39:20.760 --> 0:39:22.680
<v Speaker 4>has done over the last couple of months about the

0:39:22.719 --> 0:39:28.200
<v Speaker 4>General Services Administration, which, telling Lee is now run by

0:39:28.360 --> 0:39:33.319
<v Speaker 4>a former KKR private equity fund executive, but requiring or

0:39:33.400 --> 0:39:37.360
<v Speaker 4>demanding of consulting giants like McKinsey and BCG Etcenter, my

0:39:37.400 --> 0:39:41.760
<v Speaker 4>former employer Ey and others, to basically justify their huge

0:39:41.760 --> 0:39:45.360
<v Speaker 4>federal contracts. I wonder what you make of that effort,

0:39:45.400 --> 0:39:48.399
<v Speaker 4>whether it's sort of just a anti quote unquote woke,

0:39:48.880 --> 0:39:52.280
<v Speaker 4>anti DEI effort, or if it actually there's some substance

0:39:52.320 --> 0:39:57.160
<v Speaker 4>to telling consulting firms to justify these billions of dollars

0:39:57.160 --> 0:39:59.080
<v Speaker 4>worth of taxpayer contracts.

0:39:59.560 --> 0:40:02.880
<v Speaker 5>I I would think that if anyone is well placed

0:40:02.880 --> 0:40:05.120
<v Speaker 5>to justify billions of dollars of contracts, it would be

0:40:05.160 --> 0:40:08.399
<v Speaker 5>these consulting firms. They'll find a way, they'll they'll find

0:40:08.440 --> 0:40:11.480
<v Speaker 5>a way. Of course, in theory, there's there's nothing wrong.

0:40:12.080 --> 0:40:15.399
<v Speaker 5>It's it's like the it's like doge right. In theory, yes,

0:40:15.560 --> 0:40:18.200
<v Speaker 5>of course we should root out fraud and waste and abuse.

0:40:18.239 --> 0:40:20.400
<v Speaker 5>And yes, of course American tax paid dollars should be

0:40:20.480 --> 0:40:22.120
<v Speaker 5>used for the you know, to the to the first

0:40:22.120 --> 0:40:24.560
<v Speaker 5>this extent they can for the for the minimum amount.

0:40:25.040 --> 0:40:27.000
<v Speaker 5>But that's all fine in theory, of course, saying this

0:40:27.080 --> 0:40:30.840
<v Speaker 5>in practice for reasons that maybe they stem from DEI

0:40:30.920 --> 0:40:35.239
<v Speaker 5>considerations and quote unquote anti Wote considerations. Maybe there was

0:40:35.360 --> 0:40:40.160
<v Speaker 5>just someone at BCG or McKenzie or whomever that caught

0:40:40.200 --> 0:40:42.080
<v Speaker 5>the eye of someone who has Trump's ear. Like I,

0:40:42.200 --> 0:40:46.240
<v Speaker 5>I don't know what is actually leading this this push itself.

0:40:47.239 --> 0:40:48.680
<v Speaker 5>I mean, I will say, of course I have no

0:40:48.760 --> 0:40:51.640
<v Speaker 5>love lost for any of these firms, many of these firms,

0:40:51.640 --> 0:40:54.000
<v Speaker 5>maybe a few, maybe a few of them. And again,

0:40:54.000 --> 0:40:55.520
<v Speaker 5>something you and I have talked about in the past

0:40:56.320 --> 0:41:00.360
<v Speaker 5>is how many of these firms McKenzie, t Enao, Boston

0:41:00.400 --> 0:41:05.640
<v Speaker 5>Consulting Group have worked for regimes like Saudi Arabia and again,

0:41:05.800 --> 0:41:07.920
<v Speaker 5>open up the US to any number all manner of

0:41:07.920 --> 0:41:11.200
<v Speaker 5>Saudi influence as well as plenty of other regimes around

0:41:11.239 --> 0:41:13.880
<v Speaker 5>the world, and the one that comes to mind recently,

0:41:13.920 --> 0:41:16.399
<v Speaker 5>and it was the Financial Times that did this great

0:41:16.440 --> 0:41:19.440
<v Speaker 5>reporting on how Boston Consulting Group had been involved, or

0:41:19.440 --> 0:41:21.560
<v Speaker 5>at least a number of senior partners have been involved

0:41:21.680 --> 0:41:28.360
<v Speaker 5>in euphemistically creating exit packages for Palestinians from Gaza to

0:41:28.600 --> 0:41:35.279
<v Speaker 5>effectively whitewash Israeli ethnic cleansing campaigns. So no, I when

0:41:35.320 --> 0:41:37.520
<v Speaker 5>it comes to the Trump administration in some of these

0:41:37.560 --> 0:41:40.919
<v Speaker 5>consulting firms, please don't ask me who I'm rooting for. Yeah,

0:41:41.040 --> 0:41:42.240
<v Speaker 5>but we'll see what comes.

0:41:42.360 --> 0:41:44.839
<v Speaker 4>I suspect they'll all find a way to win at

0:41:44.880 --> 0:41:47.359
<v Speaker 4>everyone else's expense as they as they typically do.

0:41:47.640 --> 0:41:49.120
<v Speaker 5>Yes, I think that's fine.

0:41:49.320 --> 0:41:54.279
<v Speaker 4>The BCG in Gaza contracts were so revealing in the

0:41:54.360 --> 0:41:57.120
<v Speaker 4>sense that one of the things you talk about in

0:41:57.160 --> 0:42:00.560
<v Speaker 4>your book Foreign Agents, is the work that Ivy Lee,

0:42:00.600 --> 0:42:03.799
<v Speaker 4>the quote unquote father of public relations, did for the

0:42:03.880 --> 0:42:08.360
<v Speaker 4>Nazi regime, And you can draw a direct line from

0:42:08.640 --> 0:42:11.600
<v Speaker 4>that type of work in the nineteen thirties to the

0:42:11.640 --> 0:42:16.280
<v Speaker 4>type of work that BCG has been reportedly doing in

0:42:16.320 --> 0:42:20.080
<v Speaker 4>the twenty twenties. And it's the same playbook with different

0:42:20.080 --> 0:42:21.760
<v Speaker 4>actors different sums of money.

0:42:21.960 --> 0:42:24.560
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, you know, as Ivy Lee saw it, Adolf Hitler

0:42:24.640 --> 0:42:27.239
<v Speaker 5>was bringing stability to one of the key economic and

0:42:27.320 --> 0:42:33.520
<v Speaker 5>national well nations in Europe. He was a bulwark against

0:42:33.560 --> 0:42:37.759
<v Speaker 5>far left communism emanating from the Soviet Union. And at

0:42:37.800 --> 0:42:39.600
<v Speaker 5>the end of the day, if the Americans didn't partner

0:42:39.640 --> 0:42:42.480
<v Speaker 5>with him, then other regimes who are maybe opposed to

0:42:42.480 --> 0:42:44.879
<v Speaker 5>American interests would partner with him. And don't we want

0:42:44.880 --> 0:42:47.160
<v Speaker 5>to get in on the ground floor. Don't we want

0:42:47.200 --> 0:42:49.719
<v Speaker 5>to at least hear what he has to say. And yes,

0:42:49.760 --> 0:42:51.879
<v Speaker 5>maybe he has his foibles, and maybe there are some

0:42:51.920 --> 0:42:54.920
<v Speaker 5>concerns about what's happening domestically, but look, a lot of

0:42:54.920 --> 0:42:56.880
<v Speaker 5>that is just rhetoric. We don't really need to be

0:42:56.920 --> 0:42:59.640
<v Speaker 5>concerned about what Adolf Hitler is doing in Germany or

0:42:59.680 --> 0:43:04.960
<v Speaker 5>in Europe. And you can find a way to justify

0:43:05.239 --> 0:43:07.480
<v Speaker 5>if you want, and certainly if you are being paid,

0:43:08.120 --> 0:43:11.120
<v Speaker 5>you can find a way to justify almost anything. And

0:43:11.280 --> 0:43:14.399
<v Speaker 5>it has been remarkable to watch Boston Consulting Group try

0:43:14.440 --> 0:43:20.080
<v Speaker 5>to scramble to explain away how multiple senior partners were

0:43:20.080 --> 0:43:24.160
<v Speaker 5>involved in ethnic cleansing, or green lighting ethnic cleansing, or

0:43:24.200 --> 0:43:27.480
<v Speaker 5>spinning ethnic cleansing, and it's just a very short step

0:43:27.480 --> 0:43:30.000
<v Speaker 5>from there to outright genocide. And I have no doubt

0:43:30.040 --> 0:43:32.719
<v Speaker 5>that there are at least some folks in some of

0:43:32.760 --> 0:43:35.520
<v Speaker 5>these firms that have already considered what are the best

0:43:35.560 --> 0:43:39.600
<v Speaker 5>talking points if we do see a genocide or emerge

0:43:39.600 --> 0:43:42.560
<v Speaker 5>wherever it is right, whether it's in Palaesinon or Meanmar

0:43:42.719 --> 0:43:45.360
<v Speaker 5>or Sudan, there's money to be made, and if we

0:43:45.360 --> 0:43:48.319
<v Speaker 5>don't make it, our competitors will. And at the end

0:43:48.360 --> 0:43:50.840
<v Speaker 5>of the day, who needs shame anywhere.

0:43:51.600 --> 0:43:53.600
<v Speaker 4>There was a pattern that played out during the first

0:43:53.600 --> 0:43:59.080
<v Speaker 4>Trump administration of because Trump and his administration were so

0:44:00.280 --> 0:44:07.920
<v Speaker 4>you know, corrupt, outrageous, offensive, crude, that companies could essentially

0:44:07.960 --> 0:44:12.400
<v Speaker 4>step into the breach and be the benevolent, sane, competent

0:44:12.920 --> 0:44:16.120
<v Speaker 4>actors in society. That was I think part of what

0:44:16.200 --> 0:44:20.280
<v Speaker 4>drove the rise of so called ESG and corporate sustainability

0:44:20.280 --> 0:44:23.440
<v Speaker 4>and all this stuff, which is has been a trend.

0:44:23.719 --> 0:44:26.120
<v Speaker 4>That was not the first time companies had pretended to

0:44:26.120 --> 0:44:27.640
<v Speaker 4>save the world. They tend to do this when they're

0:44:27.680 --> 0:44:30.440
<v Speaker 4>facing a lot of backlash. And I wonder if you've

0:44:30.480 --> 0:44:34.960
<v Speaker 4>seen that same pattern play out again this time if

0:44:35.000 --> 0:44:38.040
<v Speaker 4>they're trying to step in and say, you know, he's

0:44:38.080 --> 0:44:40.040
<v Speaker 4>off the rails, but we got this, or if they're

0:44:40.040 --> 0:44:41.920
<v Speaker 4>more like we're just going to ride that wave and

0:44:42.360 --> 0:44:44.160
<v Speaker 4>cash in, well, I.

0:44:44.560 --> 0:44:46.440
<v Speaker 5>Mean, I guess I'm be keen for your perspective. I

0:44:46.480 --> 0:44:48.640
<v Speaker 5>certainly haven't seen any indication of that. And again, I

0:44:48.640 --> 0:44:52.919
<v Speaker 5>think it's multifold. One, we are only six months into

0:44:52.920 --> 0:44:55.200
<v Speaker 5>the new administration. Who knows where we'll be a year

0:44:55.239 --> 0:44:57.880
<v Speaker 5>from now, who knows what will happen after the terms,

0:44:58.280 --> 0:44:59.719
<v Speaker 5>and of course who knows what will actually be taking

0:44:59.719 --> 0:45:03.040
<v Speaker 5>place the final year of this second term. And two,

0:45:03.080 --> 0:45:06.440
<v Speaker 5>we've seen how aggressive the current administration is about swatting

0:45:06.480 --> 0:45:08.839
<v Speaker 5>down or suffocating or whatever term you'd like to use

0:45:09.200 --> 0:45:12.920
<v Speaker 5>private interest that may be opposed to the current administration

0:45:13.120 --> 0:45:16.319
<v Speaker 5>using the power of the state to specifically target any

0:45:16.400 --> 0:45:21.759
<v Speaker 5>in all private organizations, maybe most spectacularly in media with

0:45:22.120 --> 0:45:26.880
<v Speaker 5>paramount in the ABC settlements, that would even think about

0:45:26.960 --> 0:45:29.960
<v Speaker 5>speaking out about the current administration. I Adam, what do

0:45:30.000 --> 0:45:31.479
<v Speaker 5>you have any thoughts on this? Yeah?

0:45:31.480 --> 0:45:33.680
<v Speaker 4>I mean I don't have a more optimistic take, that's

0:45:33.719 --> 0:45:36.560
<v Speaker 4>for sure. It does feel like they got their tax

0:45:36.600 --> 0:45:39.960
<v Speaker 4>cut in twenty seventeen. End of twenty seventeen, so they

0:45:40.040 --> 0:45:42.120
<v Speaker 4>kind of got what they wanted from the administration, and

0:45:42.160 --> 0:45:44.319
<v Speaker 4>then those next couple of years it was kind of

0:45:45.320 --> 0:45:48.440
<v Speaker 4>it seemed like they either saw an opportunity or felt

0:45:48.480 --> 0:45:51.279
<v Speaker 4>an obligation to at least pretend that they were the

0:45:51.520 --> 0:45:54.640
<v Speaker 4>adults in the room. They were the serious people when

0:45:54.640 --> 0:45:57.040
<v Speaker 4>Trump was off the rails, even if they shared ultimately

0:45:57.040 --> 0:45:59.600
<v Speaker 4>the same economic goals. And I agree, now it feels

0:45:59.680 --> 0:46:02.719
<v Speaker 4>like either they're too afraid to do that, but I

0:46:02.719 --> 0:46:05.640
<v Speaker 4>think more realistically they're not interested in doing that performance

0:46:05.640 --> 0:46:07.680
<v Speaker 4>anymore because they feel like they don't have to.

0:46:08.080 --> 0:46:10.880
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, yeah, I mean, look, you know, the big beautiful

0:46:10.880 --> 0:46:12.799
<v Speaker 5>bill just passed a few weeks ago. Of course, those

0:46:13.000 --> 0:46:14.800
<v Speaker 5>many of those tax cuts we saw in twenty seventeen

0:46:14.880 --> 0:46:17.160
<v Speaker 5>or are now permanent, you know, again at a very

0:46:17.280 --> 0:46:19.200
<v Speaker 5>what we were talking about earlier, maybe a macro level.

0:46:19.239 --> 0:46:20.960
<v Speaker 5>Right there is no concern about any kind of white

0:46:21.000 --> 0:46:24.239
<v Speaker 5>collar prosecution. There's no concern about any fraud prosecution. There's

0:46:24.280 --> 0:46:26.799
<v Speaker 5>no concern about of course, foreign bribery prosecution. I mean,

0:46:26.800 --> 0:46:29.960
<v Speaker 5>and again, white collar crime is wide open right now

0:46:29.960 --> 0:46:31.520
<v Speaker 5>as long as you stay in the good graces of

0:46:31.560 --> 0:46:35.160
<v Speaker 5>the administration. You know, the only time that we saw

0:46:35.239 --> 0:46:38.720
<v Speaker 5>any kind of outspoken concerns from leaders within the private

0:46:39.160 --> 0:46:41.239
<v Speaker 5>industry space was after the think I guess it was

0:46:41.480 --> 0:46:44.400
<v Speaker 5>in April, if I remember correctly. The first was it

0:46:44.480 --> 0:46:47.000
<v Speaker 5>Liberation date? Right, the announcement of what these tariffs were

0:46:47.000 --> 0:46:48.640
<v Speaker 5>going to look like, and of course the shutter that

0:46:48.640 --> 0:46:52.279
<v Speaker 5>that's sent through private industry that did become more outspoken

0:46:52.280 --> 0:46:55.279
<v Speaker 5>about their concerns about what the administration was doing. And

0:46:55.680 --> 0:46:57.520
<v Speaker 5>I wonder if they can argue to themselves that it

0:46:57.520 --> 0:46:59.719
<v Speaker 5>seems like, oh okay, it was those concerns that that

0:46:59.760 --> 0:47:02.320
<v Speaker 5>put these tariffs kind of off into the future, and

0:47:02.640 --> 0:47:05.880
<v Speaker 5>we were able to sway President Trump. As far as

0:47:05.920 --> 0:47:07.879
<v Speaker 5>I could tell, it was just the bond markets, as

0:47:07.880 --> 0:47:10.440
<v Speaker 5>Trump said, getting jumpy or yippy, whatever the term was,

0:47:10.840 --> 0:47:14.760
<v Speaker 5>that dissuaded him. And clearly tariffs, at least the discussion

0:47:14.760 --> 0:47:17.480
<v Speaker 5>of them, have not gone anywhere. Every single day it

0:47:17.480 --> 0:47:19.600
<v Speaker 5>seems like there's a new proposal, there's a new announcement,

0:47:19.600 --> 0:47:22.160
<v Speaker 5>there's a new postponement, so on and so forth. And

0:47:22.400 --> 0:47:26.080
<v Speaker 5>I know, of course, I don't know how all this

0:47:26.120 --> 0:47:28.200
<v Speaker 5>is going to end, but I especially don't know if

0:47:28.320 --> 0:47:30.880
<v Speaker 5>or what a breaking point would look like for private

0:47:30.880 --> 0:47:33.719
<v Speaker 5>industry regarding at least the terror of conversation, and I

0:47:33.840 --> 0:47:36.920
<v Speaker 5>don't know if there is one, given how the administration

0:47:37.000 --> 0:47:38.360
<v Speaker 5>has used the power of the state thus far to

0:47:38.400 --> 0:47:39.480
<v Speaker 5>target its opponents.

0:47:39.800 --> 0:47:42.279
<v Speaker 4>And it's not like there aren't opportunities in tariffs to

0:47:42.680 --> 0:47:45.719
<v Speaker 4>raise prices. We saw that almost immediately, where you know,

0:47:45.760 --> 0:47:48.239
<v Speaker 4>even before tarists had taken effect or on industries that

0:47:48.239 --> 0:47:50.960
<v Speaker 4>weren't affected by it, they were saying, we have to

0:47:51.120 --> 0:47:53.799
<v Speaker 4>raise our prices because the tariffs. And it's sort of

0:47:53.840 --> 0:47:56.319
<v Speaker 4>like what they did with inflation a couple of years ago,

0:47:56.480 --> 0:47:58.360
<v Speaker 4>where you know, it's an opportunity to get away with

0:47:58.360 --> 0:47:59.200
<v Speaker 4>price increases.

0:47:59.280 --> 0:48:02.120
<v Speaker 5>At the very least, it degrades quality of life for

0:48:02.160 --> 0:48:04.080
<v Speaker 5>the rest of us. It makes things harder, makes things

0:48:04.080 --> 0:48:08.440
<v Speaker 5>more expensive. And if Trump, being the political savant that

0:48:08.520 --> 0:48:11.560
<v Speaker 5>he has apparently been over the last decade, is able

0:48:11.600 --> 0:48:15.719
<v Speaker 5>to distance himself sufficiently from those price increases and for

0:48:15.760 --> 0:48:18.799
<v Speaker 5>goods and services, I wouldn't put it past him. And

0:48:18.840 --> 0:48:22.120
<v Speaker 5>of course, if private industry is not unified in speaking out,

0:48:22.200 --> 0:48:25.279
<v Speaker 5>or at least sufficiently unified speaking out against this, I

0:48:25.360 --> 0:48:27.520
<v Speaker 5>look I look forward to decades of decline with you,

0:48:27.560 --> 0:48:32.600
<v Speaker 5>Adam and commiserating over silver lining, but can't quite get it. Boy,

0:48:32.719 --> 0:48:34.960
<v Speaker 5>that was a depressing comment. I'm sorry.

0:48:35.480 --> 0:48:38.120
<v Speaker 4>I mean it's it's realistic and actually related to that,

0:48:38.160 --> 0:48:40.480
<v Speaker 4>I want to ask you how you are you're sort

0:48:40.480 --> 0:48:44.680
<v Speaker 4>of personally as a human being covering this stuff right now,

0:48:44.760 --> 0:48:48.080
<v Speaker 4>how you are processing this time and history on.

0:48:48.160 --> 0:48:52.000
<v Speaker 5>My most optimistic days. It is what we were talking

0:48:52.000 --> 0:48:56.040
<v Speaker 5>about earlier, trying to convince myself that this is a

0:48:56.080 --> 0:48:58.440
<v Speaker 5>period similar to what we saw in the eighteen eighties,

0:48:58.440 --> 0:49:01.080
<v Speaker 5>eighteen nineties, and similar what we saw in the late

0:49:01.120 --> 0:49:04.799
<v Speaker 5>nineteen sixties early nineteen seventies in terms of not only

0:49:04.840 --> 0:49:09.359
<v Speaker 5>things like wealth inequality or corporates sway and lording over

0:49:09.400 --> 0:49:11.960
<v Speaker 5>American politics, but of course abuse of power, especially out

0:49:11.960 --> 0:49:14.760
<v Speaker 5>of the executive office itself. And now no historic parallel

0:49:14.840 --> 0:49:17.880
<v Speaker 5>is it's exactly parallel. Of course, this era is completely

0:49:17.880 --> 0:49:19.920
<v Speaker 5>different in so many ways. But it is trying to

0:49:19.960 --> 0:49:24.960
<v Speaker 5>find a historic resonance that gives me reason to believe

0:49:25.000 --> 0:49:28.239
<v Speaker 5>that there is to use an overused image, a pendulum

0:49:28.280 --> 0:49:30.799
<v Speaker 5>swing in the offing coming in the near future, and

0:49:30.880 --> 0:49:35.520
<v Speaker 5>on my most optimistic days, that is what I like

0:49:35.600 --> 0:49:36.800
<v Speaker 5>to consider, and of course it is going to be

0:49:36.840 --> 0:49:39.040
<v Speaker 5>part of the book itself now on my most pessimistic days,

0:49:39.440 --> 0:49:41.560
<v Speaker 5>it is simply the reality and the notion that all

0:49:41.680 --> 0:49:46.080
<v Speaker 5>empires fall, and the United States of America has always

0:49:46.080 --> 0:49:48.080
<v Speaker 5>been and continues to be an empire in some cases

0:49:48.120 --> 0:49:51.320
<v Speaker 5>in the most literal sense, with any number of territories

0:49:51.360 --> 0:49:53.560
<v Speaker 5>that we still have not yet elevated to its statehood.

0:49:53.880 --> 0:49:59.200
<v Speaker 5>But of course, the kind of entangling of corporate finance

0:49:59.600 --> 0:50:03.440
<v Speaker 5>within American elections, in American campaigns, and the reduction of

0:50:03.480 --> 0:50:07.080
<v Speaker 5>any kind of American democratic input from American voters in

0:50:07.120 --> 0:50:09.640
<v Speaker 5>the American populace. And this isn't even considering things like

0:50:09.680 --> 0:50:12.759
<v Speaker 5>the fiscal crisis that is now even further staring us

0:50:12.760 --> 0:50:14.480
<v Speaker 5>down the pipeline at some point in the not too

0:50:14.560 --> 0:50:19.040
<v Speaker 5>distant future. So I swing between those depending on the day.

0:50:19.880 --> 0:50:21.879
<v Speaker 5>And I know we talked about media diet a little

0:50:21.880 --> 0:50:23.520
<v Speaker 5>bit off the mic, but I will say one thing

0:50:23.520 --> 0:50:25.520
<v Speaker 5>that gets me through this. You can see a stack

0:50:25.560 --> 0:50:29.080
<v Speaker 5>of Batman comics behind me that always help. But also

0:50:29.239 --> 0:50:31.000
<v Speaker 5>just reading widely on things that have nothing to do

0:50:31.120 --> 0:50:33.200
<v Speaker 5>with American history, or in some cases nothing to do

0:50:33.239 --> 0:50:36.600
<v Speaker 5>with history whatsoever. It is you got to have those

0:50:36.600 --> 0:50:39.040
<v Speaker 5>mental health breaks. You can just be following the news

0:50:39.080 --> 0:50:42.080
<v Speaker 5>all day long, or you'd probably die.

0:50:42.320 --> 0:50:44.640
<v Speaker 4>It's a I mean, I too, am finding a lot

0:50:44.640 --> 0:50:49.560
<v Speaker 4>of solace in books and specifically almost less the subject

0:50:49.640 --> 0:50:53.720
<v Speaker 4>matter in some cases, and more the analog print book,

0:50:53.760 --> 0:50:56.160
<v Speaker 4>where there are no links, there are no ads, there's

0:50:56.160 --> 0:50:59.480
<v Speaker 4>no breaking news. I know, it wasn't written by an algorithm.

0:51:00.280 --> 0:51:05.239
<v Speaker 4>There's sort of a hard separation from the reality of

0:51:05.239 --> 0:51:07.759
<v Speaker 4>the world. And I will actually say the version of

0:51:07.760 --> 0:51:10.759
<v Speaker 4>the world that comes through the media is not the

0:51:10.800 --> 0:51:14.080
<v Speaker 4>whole reality. This is not some you know, raging against

0:51:14.080 --> 0:51:16.719
<v Speaker 4>the fake news media or whatever. But there is a

0:51:16.880 --> 0:51:20.879
<v Speaker 4>you know, obviously an algorithmic bias toward outrage, and there

0:51:20.960 --> 0:51:24.480
<v Speaker 4>is a rebalancing. I feel like, whether it's a graphic

0:51:24.520 --> 0:51:28.160
<v Speaker 4>novel or a comic or just a print book, that

0:51:28.160 --> 0:51:29.799
<v Speaker 4>that helps me reset a little bit.

0:51:30.160 --> 0:51:33.160
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean, you're absolutely right. Look, I'm gonna put

0:51:33.200 --> 0:51:33.720
<v Speaker 5>my old.

0:51:33.560 --> 0:51:35.279
<v Speaker 3>Man hat on and that's my favorite hat.

0:51:35.320 --> 0:51:37.480
<v Speaker 5>That. Yeah, I have to read analog books, right, I

0:51:37.560 --> 0:51:39.920
<v Speaker 5>mean I I don't have a kindle, I don't have

0:51:39.920 --> 0:51:41.440
<v Speaker 5>a nook, right, I have a pen and I have

0:51:41.560 --> 0:51:44.600
<v Speaker 5>I have my book and that's and that's how we're doing.

0:51:44.640 --> 0:51:45.959
<v Speaker 5>Of course, this is one of the benefits of reading

0:51:46.000 --> 0:51:48.279
<v Speaker 5>history is realizing that, oh, you know, the sky has

0:51:48.280 --> 0:51:51.799
<v Speaker 5>been falling for every nation for centuries, from millennia so

0:51:51.880 --> 0:51:54.359
<v Speaker 5>on and so on and so on, and who knows,

0:51:54.360 --> 0:51:56.080
<v Speaker 5>maybe we'll get through this or maybe we won't, but

0:51:56.520 --> 0:52:00.239
<v Speaker 5>much of it is beyond our control. And you know,

0:52:00.280 --> 0:52:01.920
<v Speaker 5>you try to do your good work where you can.

0:52:01.960 --> 0:52:03.520
<v Speaker 5>You try to make a difference with where you can,

0:52:03.800 --> 0:52:05.279
<v Speaker 5>and you try to spend time with people that you

0:52:05.320 --> 0:52:07.440
<v Speaker 5>care about and who care about you. In turn, let

0:52:07.440 --> 0:52:10.000
<v Speaker 5>me ask you, Adam, have you read any good books recently,

0:52:10.040 --> 0:52:11.160
<v Speaker 5>either of fiction non fiction.

0:52:11.640 --> 0:52:14.040
<v Speaker 4>I have read lots of good books. I was actually

0:52:14.080 --> 0:52:17.839
<v Speaker 4>rereading just the other day, There Are No Children Here

0:52:17.920 --> 0:52:19.080
<v Speaker 4>by Alex Kotlowitz.

0:52:19.440 --> 0:52:22.160
<v Speaker 5>Sure, yeah, it's a I've not read that one, but yeah,

0:52:22.320 --> 0:52:22.960
<v Speaker 5>I'm familiar.

0:52:23.320 --> 0:52:26.960
<v Speaker 4>I think it came out in nineteen ninety one. But Coolowitz,

0:52:27.000 --> 0:52:28.840
<v Speaker 4>who I believe is still doing this kind of journalism,

0:52:29.120 --> 0:52:31.080
<v Speaker 4>was living or spending a lot of time with the

0:52:31.120 --> 0:52:33.759
<v Speaker 4>family in a housing project in Chicago in the late

0:52:33.800 --> 0:52:37.840
<v Speaker 4>eighties and basically following these two brothers and their family

0:52:38.880 --> 0:52:41.279
<v Speaker 4>over a few years and just documenting what happens in

0:52:41.320 --> 0:52:44.359
<v Speaker 4>their lives. And I'd read it before, but it hits

0:52:44.360 --> 0:52:47.000
<v Speaker 4>a little differently now. I guess every book, you know,

0:52:47.320 --> 0:52:49.160
<v Speaker 4>if you reread something, it's always going to hit a

0:52:49.160 --> 0:52:52.680
<v Speaker 4>little bit differently. Yeah, but it's I'm definitely finding myself

0:52:52.800 --> 0:52:57.360
<v Speaker 4>drawn to books that were written kind of pre twenty tens,

0:52:58.120 --> 0:53:01.360
<v Speaker 4>and just because the world that they capture is so

0:53:02.000 --> 0:53:04.920
<v Speaker 4>it's not entirely analog, obviously, but compared to where we

0:53:04.920 --> 0:53:08.000
<v Speaker 4>are right now, it was just moving at a different speed.

0:53:08.400 --> 0:53:11.040
<v Speaker 4>And maybe that's just because a millennial. Of course, I'm

0:53:11.080 --> 0:53:14.759
<v Speaker 4>drawn to the nineties and early two thousands, but it's

0:53:14.960 --> 0:53:18.040
<v Speaker 4>it's been a good balance for my normal fiction diet

0:53:18.160 --> 0:53:21.080
<v Speaker 4>of like dystopian cli fi, which I'm having a harder

0:53:21.160 --> 0:53:22.680
<v Speaker 4>time reading these days.

0:53:22.840 --> 0:53:25.520
<v Speaker 5>I recently read in terms of dyscope, it's not quite

0:53:25.560 --> 0:53:28.839
<v Speaker 5>cli fi. I'm assuming that means climate fiction. I guess

0:53:28.840 --> 0:53:31.439
<v Speaker 5>I haven't heard that ten before. There was a book

0:53:31.480 --> 0:53:34.120
<v Speaker 5>came out a few years ago called Prophet Song set

0:53:34.120 --> 0:53:38.719
<v Speaker 5>in a near future dystopian civil war autocratic Ireland, and

0:53:38.760 --> 0:53:41.400
<v Speaker 5>the kind of drivers for that and what it means,

0:53:41.480 --> 0:53:44.719
<v Speaker 5>what it takes for one family to survive. And again

0:53:44.840 --> 0:53:48.600
<v Speaker 5>it's those perspectives to realize, oh, well, we're not quite

0:53:48.640 --> 0:53:51.600
<v Speaker 5>there yet, so maybe things aren't all horrible, all terrible

0:53:51.680 --> 0:53:54.719
<v Speaker 5>all the time. Yes, mining it is funny because you know,

0:53:54.800 --> 0:53:56.680
<v Speaker 5>mining those books and from the eighties and nineties and

0:53:56.719 --> 0:54:00.640
<v Speaker 5>the two thousands before the kind of efflorescence of smartphones

0:54:00.680 --> 0:54:03.200
<v Speaker 5>and all internet all the time, and of course now

0:54:04.120 --> 0:54:07.440
<v Speaker 5>all apps all the time. It really is in many ways,

0:54:07.440 --> 0:54:10.920
<v Speaker 5>like visiting a foreign land, similar themes, similar topics in

0:54:10.920 --> 0:54:13.839
<v Speaker 5>some cases, similar figures and forces in some cases, which

0:54:13.840 --> 0:54:17.799
<v Speaker 5>it led directly to where we are now. But revisiting that,

0:54:17.920 --> 0:54:21.000
<v Speaker 5>relearning that, and re examining what that era held, and

0:54:21.040 --> 0:54:24.120
<v Speaker 5>storing what we're right around the corner, of course, is

0:54:25.080 --> 0:54:28.040
<v Speaker 5>maybe more important now than ever, maybe growing importance every day,

0:54:28.120 --> 0:54:30.080
<v Speaker 5>or at least maybe it's just something to keep us

0:54:30.120 --> 0:54:31.920
<v Speaker 5>busy between doom school.

0:54:32.520 --> 0:54:35.800
<v Speaker 4>All possibilities and all valuable ones. And I wish we

0:54:35.880 --> 0:54:38.880
<v Speaker 4>had less to talk about, but here we are. I

0:54:38.880 --> 0:54:42.839
<v Speaker 4>am grateful for your work and your sense making of

0:54:42.920 --> 0:54:46.400
<v Speaker 4>everything happening these days. And I'm glad you've kept the

0:54:46.440 --> 0:54:48.680
<v Speaker 4>faith and kept the strength to keep doing this stuff,

0:54:48.680 --> 0:54:51.400
<v Speaker 4>because it is important, even when it feels like the

0:54:51.440 --> 0:54:55.280
<v Speaker 4>stuff that you and I talk about human rights, democracy, corruption,

0:54:55.600 --> 0:55:00.280
<v Speaker 4>don't you know not at the top of the Project

0:55:00.320 --> 0:55:02.640
<v Speaker 4>twenty twenty five, let's say, well.

0:55:02.400 --> 0:55:06.120
<v Speaker 5>To quote one of my favorite Batman movies, Adam, the

0:55:06.239 --> 0:55:11.520
<v Speaker 5>night is the darkest just before the dawn. And maybe

0:55:11.520 --> 0:55:13.279
<v Speaker 5>it's not as dark as we can see. Maybe things

0:55:13.280 --> 0:55:15.799
<v Speaker 5>will get darker, yet I suspect they probably will, and

0:55:15.840 --> 0:55:19.160
<v Speaker 5>I certainly hope that there is a dawn coming at

0:55:19.160 --> 0:55:22.520
<v Speaker 5>some point, or at the bare minimum, you and I

0:55:22.600 --> 0:55:24.839
<v Speaker 5>can reconvene here in a few months or a few

0:55:24.880 --> 0:55:28.800
<v Speaker 5>years time, whenever it is, and have more intellectually interesting

0:55:28.840 --> 0:55:30.960
<v Speaker 5>things to talk about, even if it means the world

0:55:31.000 --> 0:55:32.640
<v Speaker 5>is in a little bit worse place, because you've got

0:55:32.640 --> 0:55:34.799
<v Speaker 5>to look for those advantages in those silver linings where

0:55:34.840 --> 0:55:39.560
<v Speaker 5>you can, and you know, again, try to have conversations

0:55:39.600 --> 0:55:41.400
<v Speaker 5>that are worthwhile. So I appreciate you having me on

0:55:41.440 --> 0:55:42.879
<v Speaker 5>today to talk about some of these things.

0:55:43.400 --> 0:55:45.080
<v Speaker 3>Good place to end, Thanks again, Casey.

0:55:45.120 --> 0:55:58.680
<v Speaker 5>All right, Thanks Adam,