1 00:00:09,720 --> 00:00:12,880 Speaker 1: Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keen with 2 00:00:13,560 --> 00:00:16,560 Speaker 1: David Gura. Daily we bring you insight from the best 3 00:00:16,560 --> 00:00:22,279 Speaker 1: of economics, finance, investment, and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance 4 00:00:22,320 --> 00:00:27,000 Speaker 1: on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, Bloomberg dot Com, and of course, 5 00:00:27,320 --> 00:00:33,360 Speaker 1: on the Bloomberg Domini constant Here with us in our 6 00:00:33,360 --> 00:00:35,720 Speaker 1: Bloomberg eleven three studios. He's the global head of rates 7 00:00:35,840 --> 00:00:39,040 Speaker 1: research at Deutsche Bank Securities. Let's start by just previewing 8 00:00:39,080 --> 00:00:40,919 Speaker 1: what you expect to see tomorrow. Gonna get some new 9 00:00:40,960 --> 00:00:43,159 Speaker 1: data on inflation here in the US, so much of 10 00:00:43,200 --> 00:00:47,920 Speaker 1: the conversation centering on inflation expectations where inflation stands. What 11 00:00:48,200 --> 00:00:52,080 Speaker 1: are you looking for tomorrow when those new data come out? Um, well, 12 00:00:52,120 --> 00:00:54,680 Speaker 1: I mean the views of the official view is pretty 13 00:00:54,720 --> 00:00:57,480 Speaker 1: much consensus. Uh, sort of slightly better inflation days than 14 00:00:57,520 --> 00:00:59,560 Speaker 1: we've seen. I guess in my heart of hearts, I'm 15 00:00:59,600 --> 00:01:02,040 Speaker 1: sort of concerned that we're going to see perhaps some 16 00:01:02,120 --> 00:01:05,920 Speaker 1: broadening of the weakness. There's means some focus on the 17 00:01:05,959 --> 00:01:09,880 Speaker 1: service sector inflation being a weak relative to the good 18 00:01:09,920 --> 00:01:12,800 Speaker 1: side inflation, and that's in some sense more important because 19 00:01:12,840 --> 00:01:15,840 Speaker 1: services are much less volatile than good. So if you 20 00:01:15,880 --> 00:01:17,440 Speaker 1: get some sort of weakness there, you're going to be 21 00:01:17,440 --> 00:01:21,320 Speaker 1: wired about a more persistent downdraft inflation going forward. And 22 00:01:21,480 --> 00:01:24,880 Speaker 1: behind the sort of month to month data, we have 23 00:01:24,959 --> 00:01:27,920 Speaker 1: this sort of underlying concern that inflation is just generally 24 00:01:28,240 --> 00:01:30,800 Speaker 1: going to be sort of drifting lower or closer to 25 00:01:30,840 --> 00:01:33,800 Speaker 1: one percent than the Fed two percent targets. And that's 26 00:01:33,800 --> 00:01:37,000 Speaker 1: our kind of new inflation equilibrium concept that we've been 27 00:01:37,000 --> 00:01:40,440 Speaker 1: focused on. Tom, How do you process the divide within 28 00:01:40,480 --> 00:01:42,600 Speaker 1: the federals on this issue? And in particularly have the 29 00:01:42,600 --> 00:01:45,920 Speaker 1: Fed cheers saying this is transitory, these headwinds or transitory. 30 00:01:45,920 --> 00:01:48,240 Speaker 1: We heard from Jim Bowler of the St. Louis Fed 31 00:01:48,360 --> 00:01:51,559 Speaker 1: yesterday saying he's not optimistic we're going to see any 32 00:01:51,600 --> 00:01:55,200 Speaker 1: market rise in inflation anytime soon. How problematic is that 33 00:01:55,240 --> 00:01:57,560 Speaker 1: divide among policy makers? Well? I think that the central 34 00:01:57,560 --> 00:01:59,960 Speaker 1: banks of a real problem because you know, in general, 35 00:02:00,000 --> 00:02:01,760 Speaker 1: and it's not just the FED, they've all struggled to 36 00:02:01,800 --> 00:02:06,040 Speaker 1: meet inflation targets. H And the importance of the inflation 37 00:02:06,040 --> 00:02:08,560 Speaker 1: target for any central bank is that it obviously gives 38 00:02:08,560 --> 00:02:11,399 Speaker 1: them the anchors, you know, kind of what they do. Uh, 39 00:02:11,440 --> 00:02:14,880 Speaker 1: And it's because inflation is generally considered to be driven 40 00:02:14,919 --> 00:02:18,160 Speaker 1: by the expectations of inflation. If you have a target 41 00:02:18,160 --> 00:02:20,600 Speaker 1: that's supposed to be driving expectations and you don't meet 42 00:02:20,639 --> 00:02:23,400 Speaker 1: that target, then you have to It begs the question 43 00:02:23,440 --> 00:02:26,560 Speaker 1: what does create inflation? H And that's the kind of 44 00:02:26,600 --> 00:02:29,960 Speaker 1: idea whereby if inflation is being created by some other process, 45 00:02:30,040 --> 00:02:32,400 Speaker 1: and it could be structural, that could be do with technology, 46 00:02:32,440 --> 00:02:34,880 Speaker 1: it could be to do with demographics and all these 47 00:02:34,919 --> 00:02:37,440 Speaker 1: other sort of structural things that is really outside the 48 00:02:37,480 --> 00:02:41,400 Speaker 1: remit of a central bank, and then it almost becomes 49 00:02:41,480 --> 00:02:44,760 Speaker 1: redundancy what their inflation target is, and it may be 50 00:02:45,200 --> 00:02:48,160 Speaker 1: challenges their whole kind of policy framework. And I think 51 00:02:48,160 --> 00:02:50,840 Speaker 1: that's the that's why the the FED has to in 52 00:02:50,880 --> 00:02:53,320 Speaker 1: any center brank has to still say things are transitory. 53 00:02:53,320 --> 00:02:57,560 Speaker 1: Inflation will go up, won't it, Because otherwise otherwise what 54 00:02:57,600 --> 00:03:00,440 Speaker 1: are they doing? Well? Here in I guess the two 55 00:03:00,440 --> 00:03:02,920 Speaker 1: thousan seventeen what's the the utility of the use of 56 00:03:03,160 --> 00:03:04,960 Speaker 1: the Phillips curve at this point? How do you regard 57 00:03:05,560 --> 00:03:08,600 Speaker 1: that tool? Well, we know empirically it's been a disaster. 58 00:03:08,760 --> 00:03:12,119 Speaker 1: So if you look at five year rolling regressions of 59 00:03:12,160 --> 00:03:17,120 Speaker 1: the wage inflation versus unemployment gaps unemployment rates. Obviously, empirically 60 00:03:17,120 --> 00:03:20,679 Speaker 1: it's broken down, it's flattened and as shifted lower, which 61 00:03:20,720 --> 00:03:24,200 Speaker 1: means that the average wage inflation rates for some sort 62 00:03:24,200 --> 00:03:27,560 Speaker 1: of unemployment technliberum is much lower, and the sensitivity of 63 00:03:27,600 --> 00:03:30,920 Speaker 1: wages to change his unemployment is much lower. So empirically 64 00:03:30,919 --> 00:03:33,880 Speaker 1: it's become a problem. I think that there is a camp, obviously, 65 00:03:33,880 --> 00:03:36,440 Speaker 1: and it's a consensus camp. There's just a matter of time. 66 00:03:36,480 --> 00:03:39,160 Speaker 1: We have to be patient. This is the natural consequence 67 00:03:39,160 --> 00:03:42,080 Speaker 1: of a major financial crisis and economic downturn. It's all 68 00:03:42,080 --> 00:03:43,680 Speaker 1: going to come good, and I think that's the sort 69 00:03:43,680 --> 00:03:46,400 Speaker 1: of consensus within the FED. My concern is that there 70 00:03:46,440 --> 00:03:50,120 Speaker 1: are reasons for why we've noticed this this collapse in 71 00:03:50,160 --> 00:03:53,600 Speaker 1: the Philips curve, and they are not to do necessarily 72 00:03:53,640 --> 00:03:56,200 Speaker 1: with cyclical forces. Are to do with these structural forces 73 00:03:56,200 --> 00:03:59,160 Speaker 1: such as demographics. For example, the older people, the fifty 74 00:03:59,160 --> 00:04:02,600 Speaker 1: five year old plus generation, they've seen the biggest shift 75 00:04:02,640 --> 00:04:05,120 Speaker 1: in Phillips curve relatians is some of the younger generations. 76 00:04:05,320 --> 00:04:08,040 Speaker 1: And because though that that that that group of that 77 00:04:08,120 --> 00:04:10,520 Speaker 1: age cohort is becoming more and more dominant in the 78 00:04:10,600 --> 00:04:13,280 Speaker 1: labor force. I don't think this thing is necessary going 79 00:04:13,320 --> 00:04:15,360 Speaker 1: to change over the next five years or so. We're 80 00:04:15,400 --> 00:04:20,080 Speaker 1: waxing single equation this morning with the Philips because so 81 00:04:20,200 --> 00:04:24,000 Speaker 1: we said, good morning, David Gerin, Tom Key, Bloomberg Surveillance Dominique. 82 00:04:24,000 --> 00:04:26,000 Speaker 1: One of the ideas here is a Phillips curve, a 83 00:04:26,080 --> 00:04:29,800 Speaker 1: single equation solution. What a conceit? Come on? This thing 84 00:04:29,839 --> 00:04:32,800 Speaker 1: comes out of Lse forty years ago. I get it. 85 00:04:33,160 --> 00:04:36,039 Speaker 1: And there's been adjustments by guys a lot smarter than me. 86 00:04:36,520 --> 00:04:40,919 Speaker 1: But please tell our audience wire supposed to hinge where 87 00:04:40,960 --> 00:04:47,280 Speaker 1: we're going on. Frankly, a rather simplistic algebraic function. Well 88 00:04:47,480 --> 00:04:50,560 Speaker 1: I can. I couldn't agree more. And and it's sort 89 00:04:50,600 --> 00:04:54,320 Speaker 1: of incredibly sort of backward looking in some sense as well. 90 00:04:54,760 --> 00:04:58,440 Speaker 1: Um so, no, I I think it's a there's a 91 00:04:58,480 --> 00:05:00,240 Speaker 1: it's a it's good it's a good thing that sort 92 00:05:00,279 --> 00:05:02,919 Speaker 1: of isn't working because it makes you think about you 93 00:05:02,960 --> 00:05:06,160 Speaker 1: know what exactly, and I mean Bob Schuller's world folds 94 00:05:06,240 --> 00:05:08,839 Speaker 1: over under this, and that there's not only a behavioral 95 00:05:08,880 --> 00:05:12,520 Speaker 1: construct that you overlay on a simple algebraic function, but 96 00:05:12,640 --> 00:05:14,960 Speaker 1: at the heart all of these equations are based on 97 00:05:15,080 --> 00:05:19,560 Speaker 1: some forms of Gaussian Bell curve distributions. It's I think 98 00:05:19,600 --> 00:05:21,680 Speaker 1: we learned in the last ten years. It's not a 99 00:05:21,720 --> 00:05:24,880 Speaker 1: Bell curve world, right, Yes, And I think I guess 100 00:05:25,040 --> 00:05:27,000 Speaker 1: if you're going to defend anything, I suppose what you 101 00:05:27,200 --> 00:05:30,080 Speaker 1: do as you say that at least when things break down, 102 00:05:30,160 --> 00:05:32,200 Speaker 1: you still understand why you've been so wrong for so 103 00:05:32,240 --> 00:05:33,840 Speaker 1: long sort of thing. And I think that's going to 104 00:05:33,880 --> 00:05:36,640 Speaker 1: be the case with some of the central banks. I'll realize, 105 00:05:36,680 --> 00:05:39,440 Speaker 1: you know, they'll understand what they got wrong based Is 106 00:05:39,480 --> 00:05:41,120 Speaker 1: it just because they don't have a new theory to 107 00:05:41,160 --> 00:05:43,160 Speaker 1: go to. I mean, that's a that's a very valid 108 00:05:43,240 --> 00:05:46,479 Speaker 1: thing to ponder here, and I mean, really good papers 109 00:05:46,520 --> 00:05:48,600 Speaker 1: is summer Frankly, I mean they're driving in the dark 110 00:05:48,680 --> 00:05:51,920 Speaker 1: to some extent, and uh yeah, I mean it's been 111 00:05:52,000 --> 00:05:54,200 Speaker 1: partly because we're in this world of let's say, creative 112 00:05:54,200 --> 00:05:58,040 Speaker 1: destruction and huge structural upheavals, whether it's globalization, technology or 113 00:05:58,080 --> 00:06:00,720 Speaker 1: the aging populations. All of these things things and make 114 00:06:00,760 --> 00:06:03,560 Speaker 1: it very hard I think for anyone to have a 115 00:06:03,560 --> 00:06:06,480 Speaker 1: lot of confidence in the in the future. I mean, 116 00:06:06,560 --> 00:06:09,039 Speaker 1: David gurd did, do people understand that four months of 117 00:06:09,040 --> 00:06:11,600 Speaker 1: the year, it's like we live in Greenland. You drive 118 00:06:11,680 --> 00:06:13,560 Speaker 1: to work in the dark, and you come, you go 119 00:06:13,680 --> 00:06:18,800 Speaker 1: home from blue exactly treasure these few several months, there's 120 00:06:18,800 --> 00:06:21,400 Speaker 1: no there's no sund surveillance. I'd love you ask you 121 00:06:21,480 --> 00:06:23,760 Speaker 1: that you explained that there could be a linking between 122 00:06:24,080 --> 00:06:27,159 Speaker 1: low inflation high growth via what we're seeing inequity. Just 123 00:06:27,160 --> 00:06:30,120 Speaker 1: spell that out for you, so if you want, well, 124 00:06:29,839 --> 00:06:33,200 Speaker 1: I recall very well the late nineties early two thousand's 125 00:06:33,200 --> 00:06:36,840 Speaker 1: where we saw strong growth and low inflation, and obviously 126 00:06:36,839 --> 00:06:40,159 Speaker 1: it was associated with a real investment boom. It was 127 00:06:40,279 --> 00:06:42,520 Speaker 1: to do with the dot com bubble at the time, etcetera. 128 00:06:43,000 --> 00:06:46,520 Speaker 1: UH and extray markets were doing very well. And there's 129 00:06:46,560 --> 00:06:49,400 Speaker 1: this concept of Tobin's Q, which is basically the market 130 00:06:49,440 --> 00:06:52,719 Speaker 1: value of ecuties versus replacement costs, which is investment, which 131 00:06:52,760 --> 00:06:55,640 Speaker 1: is the investment side of it. So companies basically started 132 00:06:55,720 --> 00:06:57,839 Speaker 1: issuing a lot of equity instead of buying back their stock. 133 00:06:58,080 --> 00:07:00,720 Speaker 1: And and I know we know that the capital laborat 134 00:07:00,760 --> 00:07:03,560 Speaker 1: show the amount of investment relative to employment in the 135 00:07:03,640 --> 00:07:06,200 Speaker 1: US in particular is very very low. Now, so there 136 00:07:06,279 --> 00:07:07,839 Speaker 1: is this sort of case for saying we want to 137 00:07:07,839 --> 00:07:11,760 Speaker 1: see much higher real investment relative to employment and that 138 00:07:11,800 --> 00:07:15,240 Speaker 1: would raise productivity. And so clearly one way to do 139 00:07:15,280 --> 00:07:18,080 Speaker 1: that would be to have companies stop buying back their 140 00:07:18,120 --> 00:07:22,480 Speaker 1: stock uh and invest and UH the actual market going 141 00:07:22,600 --> 00:07:26,160 Speaker 1: up another sort of thirty percent would be equivalent to 142 00:07:26,200 --> 00:07:29,200 Speaker 1: a kind of what happened in the late nineties. And 143 00:07:29,320 --> 00:07:33,400 Speaker 1: so rather than being worried about equity bubbles and the 144 00:07:33,480 --> 00:07:35,160 Speaker 1: idea that you know, interest rates are going to go 145 00:07:35,240 --> 00:07:37,800 Speaker 1: up and and and that that the actually market may 146 00:07:37,840 --> 00:07:39,400 Speaker 1: have to come down, so that as part of that, 147 00:07:39,920 --> 00:07:42,920 Speaker 1: just maybe the outlook is to say interest rate is 148 00:07:42,960 --> 00:07:44,560 Speaker 1: going to stay very low because inflation is going to 149 00:07:44,600 --> 00:07:47,200 Speaker 1: stay very low, and interest rates will only rise when 150 00:07:47,320 --> 00:07:49,320 Speaker 1: real growth is a lot stronger. But in a way 151 00:07:49,320 --> 00:07:52,080 Speaker 1: that has to come after equities go up. What is 152 00:07:52,280 --> 00:07:53,720 Speaker 1: what is that We're going to come back with you, 153 00:07:53,840 --> 00:07:56,880 Speaker 1: but very quickly here what is the catalyst to jump 154 00:07:56,960 --> 00:08:00,320 Speaker 1: start real growth besides the hope and a prayer from 155 00:08:00,400 --> 00:08:03,840 Speaker 1: smart guys like you. Well, I mean, I think we've 156 00:08:03,880 --> 00:08:06,360 Speaker 1: had a lot of buybacks in the extray markets. Sort 157 00:08:06,360 --> 00:08:08,160 Speaker 1: of we know that there's been a lot of buybacks. 158 00:08:08,200 --> 00:08:10,880 Speaker 1: There's a sense whereby that's maybe shifting towards more m 159 00:08:10,920 --> 00:08:14,080 Speaker 1: and A activity and in the grand cycle of things. 160 00:08:14,320 --> 00:08:17,120 Speaker 1: Is possible that we could shift to greater net equity 161 00:08:17,160 --> 00:08:20,280 Speaker 1: issuance at some point once valuations in the epting markets 162 00:08:20,560 --> 00:08:23,880 Speaker 1: encourage companies to sort of think about replicating themselves rather 163 00:08:23,880 --> 00:08:26,960 Speaker 1: than buying someone else. So the cast lists would have 164 00:08:27,040 --> 00:08:30,160 Speaker 1: to come from, you know, from the financial markets to 165 00:08:30,240 --> 00:08:34,559 Speaker 1: some extent, and without doubt, a strong ectually market I 166 00:08:34,559 --> 00:08:38,240 Speaker 1: I think would encourage real investments and that would raise productivity. 167 00:08:38,280 --> 00:08:40,360 Speaker 1: You would be adding capital to labor right now. The 168 00:08:40,360 --> 00:08:43,200 Speaker 1: capital laboration shows growing is pathetic. It's growing around for 169 00:08:43,240 --> 00:08:45,960 Speaker 1: three or four percent if you're lucky. It used to be. 170 00:08:46,080 --> 00:08:48,160 Speaker 1: It's been as high as eight percent, and on average 171 00:08:48,160 --> 00:08:50,280 Speaker 1: it should be six percent. I find it interesting that 172 00:08:50,320 --> 00:08:54,560 Speaker 1: the President of the United States is retweeting a Bloomberg 173 00:08:54,600 --> 00:08:57,240 Speaker 1: Markets church. I saw that. I haven't brought it up. 174 00:08:57,320 --> 00:08:59,920 Speaker 1: I did see that. Yeah, Mr Trump, if you're listening 175 00:09:00,000 --> 00:09:02,360 Speaker 1: out on the golf course in the early morning sun, 176 00:09:02,920 --> 00:09:07,480 Speaker 1: all I can say is our team led by when M. 177 00:09:07,520 --> 00:09:10,880 Speaker 1: Bloomberg would love to visit you and move a terminal 178 00:09:11,200 --> 00:09:13,800 Speaker 1: out to your many bed men stars today he does 179 00:09:13,800 --> 00:09:16,800 Speaker 1: he understand he could have a Bloomberg log in and 180 00:09:16,960 --> 00:09:21,480 Speaker 1: have a terminal in bedstory in Florida. He could have 181 00:09:21,559 --> 00:09:24,040 Speaker 1: one at the White House when he's there. Can he 182 00:09:24,120 --> 00:09:25,719 Speaker 1: have one on the golf course? I think he can 183 00:09:25,880 --> 00:09:29,240 Speaker 1: use the professional app Very good, continue to continue to 184 00:09:29,280 --> 00:09:32,199 Speaker 1: hawk this product. That was a word by our sponsors, folks, 185 00:09:32,200 --> 00:09:35,840 Speaker 1: But we thank the President seriously for retreating show Chandra's 186 00:09:35,880 --> 00:09:38,840 Speaker 1: great work at Bloomberg Markets dominy constant with us. He 187 00:09:38,880 --> 00:09:41,920 Speaker 1: knows about the Bloomberg terminal dominic. One of the great 188 00:09:41,960 --> 00:09:45,640 Speaker 1: minds of investment was Phil Currey, enjoying a life well 189 00:09:45,679 --> 00:09:48,720 Speaker 1: into his hundredth year, a great student of solar eclipses. 190 00:09:48,760 --> 00:09:51,480 Speaker 1: As we have the clips coming up in August, and 191 00:09:51,520 --> 00:09:54,160 Speaker 1: Phil kay always talked about the bright lights of inflation 192 00:09:54,559 --> 00:09:57,719 Speaker 1: under the constant theme there aren't any bright lights. How 193 00:09:57,760 --> 00:09:59,560 Speaker 1: in the dark, How in the shade are we going 194 00:09:59,640 --> 00:10:05,240 Speaker 1: to be with a lack of inflation? Well, um, I 195 00:10:05,280 --> 00:10:08,240 Speaker 1: think it ultimately comes down to how low nominal growth 196 00:10:08,360 --> 00:10:12,120 Speaker 1: is because of the lack of inflation. So this is 197 00:10:12,200 --> 00:10:14,880 Speaker 1: why if we can, if we can make something out 198 00:10:14,920 --> 00:10:17,280 Speaker 1: of low inflation in terms of higher real growth, it 199 00:10:17,320 --> 00:10:20,439 Speaker 1: won't be so dark. So that's the kind of key 200 00:10:20,440 --> 00:10:24,200 Speaker 1: issue I think initially though, if inflation is going to 201 00:10:24,440 --> 00:10:27,920 Speaker 1: stay somewhat disappointing. UH, and we're not going to get 202 00:10:27,960 --> 00:10:30,440 Speaker 1: a big rebound or see the data obviously on the 203 00:10:30,480 --> 00:10:34,040 Speaker 1: PPI front today and UH and CPI tomorrow. But if 204 00:10:34,080 --> 00:10:37,719 Speaker 1: initially we don't get any sort of meaningful bounce back inflation, 205 00:10:37,960 --> 00:10:40,360 Speaker 1: then obviously it's going to look a little bit dark 206 00:10:40,440 --> 00:10:42,920 Speaker 1: because people are going to question what the FED is 207 00:10:42,960 --> 00:10:45,679 Speaker 1: actually doing. You know, obviously they're they're on on course 208 00:10:45,720 --> 00:10:47,800 Speaker 1: to do their balance sheet reduction, and they're talking about 209 00:10:47,880 --> 00:10:51,240 Speaker 1: hiking possibly in December, and all that's going to look 210 00:10:51,280 --> 00:10:53,920 Speaker 1: a bit sort of you know, what's the point of it? Okay, 211 00:10:53,960 --> 00:10:56,640 Speaker 1: So within your research, note, I don't think there's a 212 00:10:56,640 --> 00:11:01,400 Speaker 1: fiscal response. Well, all the infrastructure is the other father role? 213 00:11:01,520 --> 00:11:04,160 Speaker 1: Is that? I mean my yeah, I mean my view 214 00:11:04,160 --> 00:11:06,360 Speaker 1: on fiscal is to distinguish the sort of the two 215 00:11:06,440 --> 00:11:10,439 Speaker 1: kinds of fiscal One is obviously fiscal stimulus, and stimulus 216 00:11:10,480 --> 00:11:13,160 Speaker 1: is fine if in some sense you can sort of 217 00:11:13,240 --> 00:11:16,319 Speaker 1: unleash some sort of multiply effect. But there's always a 218 00:11:16,400 --> 00:11:19,760 Speaker 1: danger that the FED kind of responds to that by saying, okay, 219 00:11:19,800 --> 00:11:22,959 Speaker 1: because of our models on unemployments and we think that 220 00:11:23,000 --> 00:11:24,840 Speaker 1: Phillips curve is gonna work. We're gonna just you know, 221 00:11:25,120 --> 00:11:28,120 Speaker 1: snuff out the extra stimulus by a raising rates a 222 00:11:28,120 --> 00:11:29,760 Speaker 1: bit faster. So it could be a sort of a 223 00:11:29,880 --> 00:11:32,360 Speaker 1: zero some game if the FED kind of offsets the 224 00:11:32,400 --> 00:11:36,640 Speaker 1: fiscal fiscal reform though, is that actually kind of raises 225 00:11:36,679 --> 00:11:41,000 Speaker 1: potential growth is much more interesting because and obviously you 226 00:11:41,040 --> 00:11:44,520 Speaker 1: can sort of shift out your supply curve effectively. Uh 227 00:11:44,559 --> 00:11:47,559 Speaker 1: and um, what's the scope for that? Well, it doesn't 228 00:11:47,600 --> 00:11:49,960 Speaker 1: look so good now because they've obviously dropped some of 229 00:11:50,000 --> 00:11:53,679 Speaker 1: these are more outrageous type policies that what some people 230 00:11:53,679 --> 00:11:56,440 Speaker 1: thought were outrages, such as the border attacks. Uh. And 231 00:11:56,679 --> 00:11:59,280 Speaker 1: but those could have had a more meaningful impact I 232 00:11:59,280 --> 00:12:01,600 Speaker 1: think on potential growth. And David part of the debate 233 00:12:01,600 --> 00:12:03,559 Speaker 1: here as you've got to move the needle. I mean, 234 00:12:03,920 --> 00:12:07,079 Speaker 1: in the seventeen nineteen frillion dollar economy, it takes a 235 00:12:07,160 --> 00:12:10,040 Speaker 1: lot of fiscal part really to move the needle. You 236 00:12:10,080 --> 00:12:12,800 Speaker 1: declare volatility dead, and I'm sure there are many investors 237 00:12:12,840 --> 00:12:15,200 Speaker 1: grieving that. How do we move past that? What what 238 00:12:15,240 --> 00:12:17,000 Speaker 1: do you what do you see as the wavefward when 239 00:12:17,040 --> 00:12:19,760 Speaker 1: it comes to this this low volatility environment, Well, it 240 00:12:19,800 --> 00:12:23,559 Speaker 1: doesn't he doesn't do the hedge fund again. Yeah right, 241 00:12:24,360 --> 00:12:26,880 Speaker 1: I mean that that. I mean that invol's dead, I 242 00:12:27,000 --> 00:12:28,839 Speaker 1: think for a couple of reasons, or has been dead 243 00:12:28,840 --> 00:12:31,280 Speaker 1: for a couple of reasons. One is, obviously interest rates 244 00:12:31,320 --> 00:12:33,319 Speaker 1: are very low, and when interest rates are very low 245 00:12:33,800 --> 00:12:35,599 Speaker 1: in general volacities, he's going to be pretty low in 246 00:12:35,640 --> 00:12:37,679 Speaker 1: the rate market, and that's sort of, um, you know, 247 00:12:37,760 --> 00:12:40,040 Speaker 1: maybe infects some of these other assetment class as well, 248 00:12:40,040 --> 00:12:42,560 Speaker 1: because's not just rate vol that's obviously very low. Um. 249 00:12:42,920 --> 00:12:46,600 Speaker 1: The other reason, though, obviously, is the central banks are 250 00:12:46,640 --> 00:12:49,280 Speaker 1: such big players and the financial markets through countit of easing. 251 00:12:49,480 --> 00:12:52,280 Speaker 1: So even though the FED no longer is doing quey 252 00:12:52,280 --> 00:12:53,920 Speaker 1: and it's going to start winding down the balance sheet 253 00:12:54,000 --> 00:12:57,160 Speaker 1: very slowly, uh, the CB and BOJ are still massive 254 00:12:57,760 --> 00:13:00,800 Speaker 1: buyers of securities and that see other sort of reason 255 00:13:00,880 --> 00:13:02,800 Speaker 1: than affects it. So I think the way in which 256 00:13:02,840 --> 00:13:06,000 Speaker 1: you eventually get out of it will be some combination 257 00:13:06,280 --> 00:13:09,040 Speaker 1: of raising nominal growth and as we said, it's not 258 00:13:09,320 --> 00:13:11,280 Speaker 1: likely to come from inflation very much. It'd have to 259 00:13:11,320 --> 00:13:13,880 Speaker 1: be a real growth story eventually, but also getting the 260 00:13:13,960 --> 00:13:16,679 Speaker 1: central banks sort of out of the financial markets, and 261 00:13:17,440 --> 00:13:22,360 Speaker 1: the ECB is probably gonna taper again later, we'll announce 262 00:13:22,440 --> 00:13:25,559 Speaker 1: the tapering later this year, perhaps as early September. And 263 00:13:25,600 --> 00:13:27,439 Speaker 1: obviously fed's doing their thing on balance sheet and the 264 00:13:27,480 --> 00:13:29,280 Speaker 1: b J is going to be a long way behind. 265 00:13:29,400 --> 00:13:31,800 Speaker 1: But then eventually they may do something. So if all 266 00:13:31,840 --> 00:13:34,679 Speaker 1: goes well, you know, slowly, slowly, slowly, maybe we can 267 00:13:34,800 --> 00:13:38,560 Speaker 1: bring back higher, higher rates on the real side and somethng. 268 00:13:39,080 --> 00:13:41,120 Speaker 1: You have been more than generous, as I say, folks, 269 00:13:41,360 --> 00:13:43,439 Speaker 1: the problem with Domini because you have to read as 270 00:13:43,520 --> 00:13:47,840 Speaker 1: length theory, search past word by word. Sure we protect 271 00:13:47,880 --> 00:13:50,439 Speaker 1: the carpyright. I've already had a couple of emails. No, 272 00:13:50,760 --> 00:13:53,240 Speaker 1: we're not going to mail out Deutscha Bank's work. Please 273 00:13:53,240 --> 00:14:09,439 Speaker 1: contact Deutsche Bank for doctor customs. Brilliant, uh, David, I 274 00:14:09,520 --> 00:14:11,880 Speaker 1: guess we should wax politically here. That seems to be 275 00:14:12,000 --> 00:14:15,920 Speaker 1: the season with a qualified candidate, the former governor of Oklahoma. 276 00:14:16,160 --> 00:14:20,760 Speaker 1: Oklahoma's outside of the three zip codes we work within, David, 277 00:14:20,840 --> 00:14:24,360 Speaker 1: it's the rest of America. We second morning to our 278 00:14:24,400 --> 00:14:27,400 Speaker 1: listeners there on serious ex im one nineteen. If Frank 279 00:14:27,480 --> 00:14:30,440 Speaker 1: Keating joins us now, as you say, former governor of 280 00:14:30,520 --> 00:14:33,160 Speaker 1: Oklahoma with a long history with the FBI as well. 281 00:14:33,200 --> 00:14:34,920 Speaker 1: He governor Keating. Great to have you on the program 282 00:14:35,000 --> 00:14:37,000 Speaker 1: once again got us up to speed on what you're 283 00:14:37,080 --> 00:14:40,840 Speaker 1: watching here as all of these investigations unfold. Given your background, 284 00:14:40,960 --> 00:14:43,600 Speaker 1: what's most interesting to you? Where do you see the 285 00:14:43,720 --> 00:14:48,000 Speaker 1: most interest when it comes into the Russia investigations. Well, I, 286 00:14:48,480 --> 00:14:52,800 Speaker 1: of course, as a citizen, UM was not surprised, but 287 00:14:52,920 --> 00:14:55,760 Speaker 1: certainly as a result of my background that the Russians 288 00:14:55,840 --> 00:15:00,720 Speaker 1: and others have been interested in American politics and American elections. 289 00:15:00,800 --> 00:15:04,600 Speaker 1: Have they been, um doing everything in their power to 290 00:15:04,800 --> 00:15:08,120 Speaker 1: disrupt them or to change the outcome? Well, I suppose 291 00:15:08,240 --> 00:15:11,800 Speaker 1: they would try if they could, But de Nited States 292 00:15:11,920 --> 00:15:14,840 Speaker 1: does the same thing. They are we are very interested 293 00:15:14,880 --> 00:15:17,800 Speaker 1: in what's going on in countries that are our adversaries, 294 00:15:18,120 --> 00:15:20,680 Speaker 1: and I'm sure and I know that in the past 295 00:15:21,160 --> 00:15:24,920 Speaker 1: there have been efforts made to change outcomes of elections. 296 00:15:25,240 --> 00:15:30,720 Speaker 1: But that said, UM, I'm not friendly to the concept 297 00:15:30,760 --> 00:15:35,160 Speaker 1: of an independent council, a special prosecutor special council, because 298 00:15:35,200 --> 00:15:38,440 Speaker 1: if you have one victim and you have an armory 299 00:15:38,520 --> 00:15:42,560 Speaker 1: of investigators, have an army of prosecutors, you're going to 300 00:15:42,640 --> 00:15:44,880 Speaker 1: get your victim, whether it's spending on the sidewalk or 301 00:15:44,920 --> 00:15:48,120 Speaker 1: whether in for example, the Trump case, UM it's a 302 00:15:48,240 --> 00:15:52,240 Speaker 1: deduction that wasn't warranted, or you in a limited um 303 00:15:52,560 --> 00:15:57,440 Speaker 1: partnership value a property greater than its real value was, 304 00:15:57,560 --> 00:16:00,920 Speaker 1: and all that's of course arguable, but that's what worries me. 305 00:16:01,160 --> 00:16:04,280 Speaker 1: The Independent Council himself, Bob Mueller, I think is a 306 00:16:04,520 --> 00:16:07,720 Speaker 1: very fine person, very sharp person. But again it's the 307 00:16:07,880 --> 00:16:11,240 Speaker 1: concept itself and where it goes with anybody's guests. But 308 00:16:11,360 --> 00:16:14,680 Speaker 1: I would imagine they'll find something, and I think that's 309 00:16:14,760 --> 00:16:17,920 Speaker 1: terribly destructive to a free society. How does somebody like 310 00:16:18,200 --> 00:16:22,600 Speaker 1: Mr Mueller, the agents who are working these investigations, how 311 00:16:22,640 --> 00:16:25,440 Speaker 1: do they tune out the political noise surrounding all of this. 312 00:16:25,600 --> 00:16:28,840 Speaker 1: We've seen some criticism direct and indirect of Mr Mueller, 313 00:16:28,880 --> 00:16:32,560 Speaker 1: for instance, uh speculation that he might be be removed, etcetera. 314 00:16:32,640 --> 00:16:35,160 Speaker 1: When you're working investigation like this amid all of these 315 00:16:35,160 --> 00:16:38,400 Speaker 1: political pressures, how do you tune that out? Well? I 316 00:16:38,560 --> 00:16:41,120 Speaker 1: was U S attorney in in my state, and I 317 00:16:41,280 --> 00:16:43,480 Speaker 1: share the U S attorneys. I was number three at 318 00:16:43,520 --> 00:16:46,720 Speaker 1: the Justice Department and supervised versually all of the federal 319 00:16:46,920 --> 00:16:50,200 Speaker 1: enters and establishment at Treasury and in Justice. We had 320 00:16:50,360 --> 00:16:55,600 Speaker 1: pretty strong rules that we didn't get engaged in politics 321 00:16:56,080 --> 00:16:58,840 Speaker 1: unless there was a real issue, I mean, a very 322 00:16:59,000 --> 00:17:06,400 Speaker 1: very dangerous um challenge to legal, challenge to the process itself. 323 00:17:06,680 --> 00:17:08,960 Speaker 1: I remember one time, as a young agent in San Francisco, 324 00:17:09,520 --> 00:17:13,320 Speaker 1: I interviewed Mayor Alito, who then was under an investigation. 325 00:17:13,400 --> 00:17:16,679 Speaker 1: I don't recall at this juncture what poor And he said, well, 326 00:17:16,760 --> 00:17:19,080 Speaker 1: you're just here because of Richard Nixon told you to 327 00:17:19,160 --> 00:17:23,120 Speaker 1: come here. But they average fbigent. You know, he has 328 00:17:23,480 --> 00:17:26,639 Speaker 1: cases open, he's assigned to lead, he interviews people. He 329 00:17:26,840 --> 00:17:30,200 Speaker 1: is totally a political and he is you know, totally 330 00:17:30,280 --> 00:17:33,360 Speaker 1: professional at least that has been my experience. So where 331 00:17:33,480 --> 00:17:36,080 Speaker 1: this goes is anybody's yes. But as I said, I 332 00:17:36,240 --> 00:17:39,440 Speaker 1: just hope that it's not another kem Star. We moved 333 00:17:39,520 --> 00:17:43,480 Speaker 1: from white Water to the staining dress and the President 334 00:17:43,560 --> 00:17:46,080 Speaker 1: rying about having it's We're going to turn things in 335 00:17:46,160 --> 00:17:48,119 Speaker 1: your head. That's what we do. In August, here David gurin, 336 00:17:48,440 --> 00:17:52,280 Speaker 1: Tom Keene with us, the governor of Oklahoma, the former governor, 337 00:17:52,320 --> 00:17:54,480 Speaker 1: Frank Keating, of course, with his public service with the 338 00:17:54,480 --> 00:17:58,080 Speaker 1: Federal Bureau of Investigation, talking here about Mr Mueller earlier 339 00:17:58,119 --> 00:18:01,840 Speaker 1: in that Frank, let's talk Anna Langthorne. She's head of 340 00:18:01,840 --> 00:18:07,600 Speaker 1: the Oklahoma Democrats. John Sparks a Senate leader, Scott Inman 341 00:18:07,640 --> 00:18:11,320 Speaker 1: the House leader. The Democrats owned the state from nineteen 342 00:18:11,359 --> 00:18:15,240 Speaker 1: o seven to nine, when the Commies known as the Republicans, 343 00:18:15,320 --> 00:18:18,480 Speaker 1: took over the state. What do the Democrats need to 344 00:18:18,560 --> 00:18:22,040 Speaker 1: do to get that traditional Democratic voice back? Many would 345 00:18:22,040 --> 00:18:26,280 Speaker 1: suggest that the Secretary of State lost the election rather 346 00:18:26,359 --> 00:18:29,560 Speaker 1: than Mr Trump won it. Do you have any worry 347 00:18:29,600 --> 00:18:32,840 Speaker 1: that the Democrats actually get their message organized and they 348 00:18:32,920 --> 00:18:38,080 Speaker 1: take back Michigan or they could even take back Oklahoma. Well, 349 00:18:38,160 --> 00:18:42,000 Speaker 1: you know, Tom, it is uh anybody's guess right now, 350 00:18:42,160 --> 00:18:45,640 Speaker 1: because I was the first Republican governor of my state 351 00:18:45,720 --> 00:18:48,400 Speaker 1: since the sixties, the Democrats in control of the House 352 00:18:48,480 --> 00:18:52,240 Speaker 1: and Senate forever. And my whole theme was why are 353 00:18:52,320 --> 00:18:55,719 Speaker 1: we for capita income? There's no reason for this. When 354 00:18:55,760 --> 00:18:58,520 Speaker 1: I left office, oil was never above eighteen dollars of barrow. 355 00:18:58,600 --> 00:19:01,439 Speaker 1: We were concurty seven and per capita income. We put 356 00:19:01,560 --> 00:19:04,680 Speaker 1: right to work in the constitution. Today, the highway system, 357 00:19:04,720 --> 00:19:07,280 Speaker 1: the turnpikes, made the kids take carter course in school, 358 00:19:07,760 --> 00:19:10,080 Speaker 1: you know, charter choice. All that stuff. Got rid of 359 00:19:10,160 --> 00:19:13,440 Speaker 1: welfare through a Democrat House and Senate. It can be done. 360 00:19:14,119 --> 00:19:17,080 Speaker 1: But what's important is to have Republicans realized. To be 361 00:19:17,200 --> 00:19:20,720 Speaker 1: the party of Lincoln, they have to win Lincoln agendas, 362 00:19:21,280 --> 00:19:23,479 Speaker 1: and the Democrats to be a party of Jefferson, they 363 00:19:23,520 --> 00:19:26,359 Speaker 1: have to win Jefferson agendas. But both of them are 364 00:19:26,400 --> 00:19:30,159 Speaker 1: American agendas. Come together, let's work it out and do 365 00:19:30,280 --> 00:19:34,040 Speaker 1: what's necessary to make America great again. As the President says, 366 00:19:34,119 --> 00:19:37,320 Speaker 1: So it's not that difficult. It doesn't really take a 367 00:19:38,359 --> 00:19:41,080 Speaker 1: a PhD in economics to figure out what America? What 368 00:19:41,160 --> 00:19:44,199 Speaker 1: ails America? And this tax thing, I think is going 369 00:19:44,280 --> 00:19:47,800 Speaker 1: to be watched very carefully with all those trillions abroad, 370 00:19:47,880 --> 00:19:50,240 Speaker 1: and we're gonna fix the system and bring that money home. 371 00:19:50,760 --> 00:19:54,040 Speaker 1: We'll see. But it does take leadership, and it has 372 00:19:54,200 --> 00:19:56,760 Speaker 1: it takes humility to get stuff done. You can't like it, 373 00:19:57,119 --> 00:19:59,359 Speaker 1: you just can't take the view con that it's my 374 00:19:59,520 --> 00:20:02,720 Speaker 1: way or the highway. Where's that humility? Where's that leadership 375 00:20:02,760 --> 00:20:04,320 Speaker 1: going to come from? As you mentioned, we're all watching 376 00:20:04,400 --> 00:20:06,720 Speaker 1: what's what's happening We're going to happen in Washington when 377 00:20:06,720 --> 00:20:10,399 Speaker 1: it comes to tax reform. Where do you do you 378 00:20:10,480 --> 00:20:13,119 Speaker 1: see a real leadership in humility? Deficit in Washington and 379 00:20:13,200 --> 00:20:17,960 Speaker 1: what's going to fill that Well, obviously Donald Trump, there's 380 00:20:18,000 --> 00:20:20,400 Speaker 1: not a whole lot of humility there. But he wants 381 00:20:20,440 --> 00:20:23,840 Speaker 1: to win. He wants to be a successful president. I 382 00:20:23,960 --> 00:20:26,399 Speaker 1: know the vice president feels the same way. Think of 383 00:20:26,440 --> 00:20:29,440 Speaker 1: the good men and women who are willing to serve 384 00:20:29,520 --> 00:20:32,919 Speaker 1: in the administration. They don't want to leave a wreckage 385 00:20:33,320 --> 00:20:36,479 Speaker 1: of a legacy. I mean, they want to win. They 386 00:20:36,520 --> 00:20:40,160 Speaker 1: want to succeed as well. And I really think the Democrats. 387 00:20:40,880 --> 00:20:43,840 Speaker 1: My grandfather was a bank owner in Illinois, but he 388 00:20:44,000 --> 00:20:48,639 Speaker 1: was a Democrat member of Congress. Your father, my granddad was, 389 00:20:49,640 --> 00:20:53,280 Speaker 1: but he I mean he really thought deep these issues 390 00:20:53,359 --> 00:20:57,320 Speaker 1: and he wanted um during he was a member during 391 00:20:57,359 --> 00:21:00,439 Speaker 1: the depression. He wanted to make sure that small towns 392 00:21:00,520 --> 00:21:04,400 Speaker 1: and community banks were listened to and looked at during 393 00:21:04,440 --> 00:21:07,720 Speaker 1: the course of the recovery from the from the depression. 394 00:21:08,200 --> 00:21:10,800 Speaker 1: And you know, but it does take, you know, the 395 00:21:10,880 --> 00:21:14,560 Speaker 1: president's leadership, and he needs to send up ahead of 396 00:21:14,600 --> 00:21:17,480 Speaker 1: the table, bring people from both sides in and say, look, 397 00:21:17,760 --> 00:21:20,280 Speaker 1: here's how I see we ought to go. What do 398 00:21:20,400 --> 00:21:22,959 Speaker 1: you think can we count on you to help us? 399 00:21:23,280 --> 00:21:25,000 Speaker 1: And you look at the Democrats, how do you hike 400 00:21:25,040 --> 00:21:28,840 Speaker 1: camp for North Dakota's um Joe mansion from West Virginia. 401 00:21:29,160 --> 00:21:32,639 Speaker 1: Those are conservative people. There are Democrats that are up 402 00:21:32,680 --> 00:21:37,320 Speaker 1: for reelection from states that the President won. Those individuals 403 00:21:37,440 --> 00:21:42,240 Speaker 1: are talkable. I mean, they're not completely fanatical for the 404 00:21:42,320 --> 00:21:46,040 Speaker 1: Democratic Party. They are fanatical to be reelected, and I 405 00:21:46,160 --> 00:21:49,600 Speaker 1: think there's an opportunity here to address their concerns and 406 00:21:49,680 --> 00:21:53,240 Speaker 1: address thecerns of concerns of the country and solve these problems. 407 00:21:53,280 --> 00:21:56,800 Speaker 1: I just I'm puzzled, as a former executive of the state, 408 00:21:57,480 --> 00:22:00,840 Speaker 1: why this is so difficult. I just don't understand. How 409 00:22:00,960 --> 00:22:04,360 Speaker 1: far does does that distance between Oklahoma City and Washington 410 00:22:04,480 --> 00:22:07,280 Speaker 1: Field today? But does it does it feel farther than 411 00:22:07,320 --> 00:22:11,200 Speaker 1: it has? Well, it's interesting when our members come home, 412 00:22:11,240 --> 00:22:14,600 Speaker 1: and they're all good people. When they come home, they're 413 00:22:14,680 --> 00:22:17,080 Speaker 1: convinced that things are going to get fixed and things 414 00:22:17,119 --> 00:22:21,800 Speaker 1: are gonna move forward. But they, as I I'm sure David, 415 00:22:21,880 --> 00:22:24,879 Speaker 1: you and Tom as well, aren't sure what kind of 416 00:22:25,200 --> 00:22:27,920 Speaker 1: leadership the president is going to provide. Because he is analyst, 417 00:22:28,000 --> 00:22:31,360 Speaker 1: this is not his area of expertise, but he wants 418 00:22:31,440 --> 00:22:34,080 Speaker 1: to win. So what's important is for the vice president 419 00:22:34,160 --> 00:22:37,840 Speaker 1: to take a much more private role with the President, 420 00:22:38,359 --> 00:22:40,840 Speaker 1: and hopefully this lunch today will help in that direction 421 00:22:41,080 --> 00:22:42,840 Speaker 1: where the VP says, you know, we're all going to 422 00:22:42,920 --> 00:22:45,080 Speaker 1: look like fools so we don't get stuff done, and 423 00:22:45,200 --> 00:22:47,879 Speaker 1: here's what I suggest we do, and hopefully they'll do that. 424 00:22:48,480 --> 00:22:50,879 Speaker 1: A great point to David's wonderful question. I got the 425 00:22:50,920 --> 00:22:52,920 Speaker 1: map out here, folks, and you know I've driven some 426 00:22:53,080 --> 00:22:55,160 Speaker 1: of this. I've had the privilege I had parents, Frank, 427 00:22:55,200 --> 00:22:57,280 Speaker 1: who just put you in the car and said let's go. 428 00:22:57,400 --> 00:23:00,320 Speaker 1: And there's no air conditioning. You know you I'm out 429 00:23:00,320 --> 00:23:02,560 Speaker 1: of Oklahoma, and I mean, I know you take the 430 00:23:02,640 --> 00:23:05,600 Speaker 1: Keating family Gulf Stream, but the answers you to go. 431 00:23:06,520 --> 00:23:09,200 Speaker 1: You go south and drive through Nashville, or you go 432 00:23:09,400 --> 00:23:13,240 Speaker 1: north and drive through Mike Michael Pence Indianapolis. I mean, 433 00:23:13,280 --> 00:23:17,440 Speaker 1: there's there's two arcs to drive from Oklahoma to Washington. 434 00:23:18,240 --> 00:23:21,280 Speaker 1: What does that group of Republicans say about this president? 435 00:23:21,480 --> 00:23:24,720 Speaker 1: Whether you take the southern arc through Nashville or the 436 00:23:24,800 --> 00:23:28,080 Speaker 1: Interstates through Indianapolis. You've got a lot of people they're 437 00:23:28,240 --> 00:23:32,240 Speaker 1: baffled by this president. Is that right? Or am I wrong? 438 00:23:32,359 --> 00:23:36,600 Speaker 1: He's Does he have that much support out there? Well? 439 00:23:36,680 --> 00:23:42,320 Speaker 1: I think everybody uh wants him to succeed. The people 440 00:23:42,400 --> 00:23:45,119 Speaker 1: I talked to of all walks of life want the 441 00:23:45,200 --> 00:23:49,359 Speaker 1: president to succeed, but they're not sure what that means 442 00:23:49,440 --> 00:23:52,080 Speaker 1: to him. I mean, is that something he feels he 443 00:23:52,200 --> 00:23:55,320 Speaker 1: has to do to wom in public policy, not just 444 00:23:55,560 --> 00:24:00,360 Speaker 1: in pr and I think those are important distinctions. Most 445 00:24:00,440 --> 00:24:03,680 Speaker 1: people know he's the only president we've got. We can't 446 00:24:03,840 --> 00:24:06,240 Speaker 1: vote for him or against him for a few more years, 447 00:24:06,640 --> 00:24:09,960 Speaker 1: So why doesn't he win? I mean, let's win some 448 00:24:10,119 --> 00:24:15,640 Speaker 1: of these races, meaning political legislative races. Let's win these 449 00:24:15,720 --> 00:24:19,080 Speaker 1: issues and then move on, and then everybody lives happly 450 00:24:19,119 --> 00:24:22,359 Speaker 1: ever after. People wanting to do well, they're just not 451 00:24:22,480 --> 00:24:24,720 Speaker 1: sure if he will. But frank I mean again, I 452 00:24:24,800 --> 00:24:26,680 Speaker 1: know you take the Keating goulf stream, but if you 453 00:24:26,760 --> 00:24:29,880 Speaker 1: were to take Ice seventy through Michael for the vice 454 00:24:29,960 --> 00:24:34,640 Speaker 1: President's Indiana and if you passed Brazil Indiana, I'm gonna 455 00:24:34,680 --> 00:24:39,000 Speaker 1: make the assumption Brazil is west southwest of Indianapolis. I'm 456 00:24:39,000 --> 00:24:41,600 Speaker 1: gonna make the assumption the good people of Brazil Indiana 457 00:24:42,040 --> 00:24:46,919 Speaker 1: probably went Republican. Those people put you in office. Are 458 00:24:46,960 --> 00:24:49,760 Speaker 1: they still going to vote for this president? Is Frankly, 459 00:24:49,840 --> 00:24:53,960 Speaker 1: some of the polls say yes they will. I think 460 00:24:54,000 --> 00:24:56,480 Speaker 1: most people are only loyal to their wives and half 461 00:24:56,520 --> 00:25:00,239 Speaker 1: of their marriages in the divorce. So now I mean 462 00:25:00,680 --> 00:25:03,880 Speaker 1: there are probably and this is our challenges the as 463 00:25:03,920 --> 00:25:07,240 Speaker 1: the Party of Lincoln an African American community that is 464 00:25:07,359 --> 00:25:11,720 Speaker 1: solidly Democrat, and that disappoints me. But obviously we've got 465 00:25:11,840 --> 00:25:14,560 Speaker 1: to work to open up the opportunity for those folks 466 00:25:14,640 --> 00:25:17,640 Speaker 1: in the convincing to vote Republican. But I think most 467 00:25:17,680 --> 00:25:20,159 Speaker 1: people will vote against Trump just as fast as they 468 00:25:20,280 --> 00:25:24,320 Speaker 1: voted foreign. If you think, did you have an attorney 469 00:25:24,400 --> 00:25:26,160 Speaker 1: general that's going to get you back to the Party 470 00:25:26,200 --> 00:25:32,480 Speaker 1: of Lincoln, well, you know, I the reality is I 471 00:25:33,160 --> 00:25:35,440 Speaker 1: Jeff and I have been friends. Jeff Sessons and I've 472 00:25:35,480 --> 00:25:38,720 Speaker 1: been friends back when we were U S attorneys together, 473 00:25:39,520 --> 00:25:42,760 Speaker 1: And you know, I think that like any of us. 474 00:25:43,280 --> 00:25:45,160 Speaker 1: For example, when I was nominated to beyond the Tenth 475 00:25:45,200 --> 00:25:47,480 Speaker 1: Circuit Court of Appeals, one of the Democrat members of 476 00:25:47,560 --> 00:25:51,360 Speaker 1: the Judiciary Committee in the Congress said, well, I'm very 477 00:25:51,440 --> 00:25:56,119 Speaker 1: concerned about, you know, your issue as to how you 478 00:25:56,280 --> 00:26:00,560 Speaker 1: handle as General Counsel of HUD issues that aginally had 479 00:26:00,680 --> 00:26:03,320 Speaker 1: racial overtones. And I said, I said, sender are you 480 00:26:03,440 --> 00:26:05,680 Speaker 1: where I was State Council of the mule a CP 481 00:26:05,840 --> 00:26:09,320 Speaker 1: in Oklahoma, and then immediately changed the subject because if 482 00:26:09,359 --> 00:26:12,439 Speaker 1: you're a quite male Republican, you're supposed to be a racist, 483 00:26:12,640 --> 00:26:15,640 Speaker 1: which is a complete libel. And I think I think 484 00:26:15,680 --> 00:26:17,680 Speaker 1: that Jeff is a good man, doing the best you camp. 485 00:26:17,880 --> 00:26:20,600 Speaker 1: This has been great. Frank Keating, always inspiring. Thank you 486 00:26:20,720 --> 00:26:23,920 Speaker 1: so much. Always love the conversation with Governor Keating. I've 487 00:26:23,920 --> 00:26:25,720 Speaker 1: got to do, Ah, I've got to do an apology 488 00:26:25,800 --> 00:26:28,639 Speaker 1: to David Guru because I'm a monopolis for conversation. As 489 00:26:29,359 --> 00:26:31,680 Speaker 1: Frank Keating got me going on, we'll have him back. 490 00:26:32,040 --> 00:26:34,280 Speaker 1: Can we book the sixteenth President? Can you try to 491 00:26:34,320 --> 00:26:37,160 Speaker 1: get a Lincoln in your Frank Keating joining us from 492 00:26:37,160 --> 00:26:50,680 Speaker 1: Oklahoma City on our phone lines. What are we gonna retire? 493 00:26:50,720 --> 00:26:53,600 Speaker 1: General Mark kimmittt. He's former Assistant Secretary of State, former 494 00:26:53,600 --> 00:26:55,879 Speaker 1: deputy assistant Secretary of Defense, someone who can give us 495 00:26:55,920 --> 00:26:58,639 Speaker 1: some invaluable perspective here on the war of words, the 496 00:26:58,720 --> 00:27:02,000 Speaker 1: rhetoric that we've heard you're regarding North Korea over these 497 00:27:02,080 --> 00:27:03,840 Speaker 1: last a few days. He joins us from our Note 498 00:27:04,080 --> 00:27:07,280 Speaker 1: one studios in Washington, d C. This morning. Great to 499 00:27:07,359 --> 00:27:08,680 Speaker 1: have you with us here. Let me let me start 500 00:27:08,720 --> 00:27:10,720 Speaker 1: just by asking you to react to what we've heard 501 00:27:11,240 --> 00:27:15,560 Speaker 1: thus far on Twitter, in comments at Bedminster, and through 502 00:27:15,640 --> 00:27:18,920 Speaker 1: Statan's UH from the Korean Peninsula as well. What do 503 00:27:19,000 --> 00:27:21,520 Speaker 1: you make of what we're hearing right now? General, Well, 504 00:27:21,560 --> 00:27:24,200 Speaker 1: two things. First of all, I think the comments that 505 00:27:24,280 --> 00:27:27,280 Speaker 1: came out of the President have been sort of amplified 506 00:27:27,359 --> 00:27:29,760 Speaker 1: down here in Washington, d C. Which is more of 507 00:27:29,840 --> 00:27:33,640 Speaker 1: a function of the political descent between the administration. More 508 00:27:33,720 --> 00:27:37,040 Speaker 1: important is what Secretary Madison Secretary Tillerson had been saying. 509 00:27:37,119 --> 00:27:40,800 Speaker 1: Secretary Tillerson continues to believe that diplomacy is the right 510 00:27:40,880 --> 00:27:44,200 Speaker 1: way to handle this, but Secretary Maddis put out in 511 00:27:44,280 --> 00:27:50,359 Speaker 1: an extraordinarily tough statement yesterday UH in effect threatening the 512 00:27:50,480 --> 00:27:53,760 Speaker 1: North Korean regime that says, if you come after us, 513 00:27:53,960 --> 00:27:58,359 Speaker 1: we will destroy your country and we will destroy your people. 514 00:27:58,760 --> 00:28:01,560 Speaker 1: That's about the toughest writer work I've heard on this situation, 515 00:28:02,200 --> 00:28:05,200 Speaker 1: UM since I can remember. Yeah, I wanted to ask 516 00:28:05,240 --> 00:28:08,200 Speaker 1: you if if the rhetoric and risk are matched up here. 517 00:28:08,600 --> 00:28:11,320 Speaker 1: We listened to Secretary State Rex to Luison asked he 518 00:28:11,400 --> 00:28:15,960 Speaker 1: flew to Guam yesterday. He said Americans should be sleeping sadly, etcetera, etcetera. 519 00:28:16,880 --> 00:28:18,639 Speaker 1: Is the risk as great as the rhetoric would lead 520 00:28:18,760 --> 00:28:21,800 Speaker 1: lead lead one to think. I don't think so. Um. 521 00:28:22,240 --> 00:28:24,520 Speaker 1: The only risk that I'm concerned about is the risk 522 00:28:24,560 --> 00:28:28,440 Speaker 1: of miscalculation that somehow, in this war of words, somebody 523 00:28:28,520 --> 00:28:33,080 Speaker 1: makes mistake, somebody says something uh that is interpreted by 524 00:28:33,080 --> 00:28:36,760 Speaker 1: the other side the wrong way. And what has gone 525 00:28:36,920 --> 00:28:40,840 Speaker 1: then from a rhetorical battle to something a little more significant? 526 00:28:41,520 --> 00:28:44,240 Speaker 1: How much has as as this conversation changed. Of course, 527 00:28:44,280 --> 00:28:46,840 Speaker 1: we've seen now two tests of intercontinental bistic missiles. There's 528 00:28:46,840 --> 00:28:49,280 Speaker 1: the reporting by the Washington Post and others that have 529 00:28:49,360 --> 00:28:52,360 Speaker 1: they've managed to miniaturize a nuclear weapon. How much has 530 00:28:52,440 --> 00:28:56,920 Speaker 1: as the circumstances changed here over these last few years. Well, 531 00:28:58,320 --> 00:29:00,520 Speaker 1: that really is two questions number on how has the 532 00:29:00,560 --> 00:29:04,160 Speaker 1: rhetoric changed. Certainly it's become a lot tougher because I 533 00:29:04,240 --> 00:29:08,320 Speaker 1: think this administration recognizes that they speak softly and carry 534 00:29:08,520 --> 00:29:12,360 Speaker 1: a big stick philosophy which is guided our diplomacy with 535 00:29:12,480 --> 00:29:15,000 Speaker 1: North Korea over the past fifteen years, has done nothing 536 00:29:15,080 --> 00:29:19,000 Speaker 1: to limit or slow down the nuclear development of North Korea. 537 00:29:19,560 --> 00:29:21,880 Speaker 1: So I believe the rhetoric is a little bit tougher. 538 00:29:22,000 --> 00:29:24,400 Speaker 1: In fact, it's considerably tougher. And I think at this 539 00:29:24,560 --> 00:29:28,960 Speaker 1: point that the answer is not only carry a big stick, 540 00:29:29,440 --> 00:29:33,880 Speaker 1: but also talk in the language that this guy understands. Jena, Kimmy, 541 00:29:33,960 --> 00:29:36,840 Speaker 1: you have, as all generals and animals do, a most 542 00:29:36,960 --> 00:29:40,240 Speaker 1: interesting path through your military. There are all sorts of 543 00:29:40,320 --> 00:29:44,800 Speaker 1: wonderful ribbons. The Army Commendation Medal, the Global War on Terrorism, 544 00:29:44,920 --> 00:29:49,560 Speaker 1: expeditionary metal, your service in Germany, your master parachutes wings. 545 00:29:49,840 --> 00:29:52,480 Speaker 1: Do you get a ribbon for having a Chartered Financial 546 00:29:52,560 --> 00:29:56,600 Speaker 1: Analyst designation? Did you get Do I get to wear 547 00:29:56,600 --> 00:29:59,480 Speaker 1: a ribbon because I have that? I mean, what was 548 00:29:59,560 --> 00:30:01,920 Speaker 1: it like in a c f A under the guise 549 00:30:02,000 --> 00:30:07,680 Speaker 1: of military education. Well, it was very interesting. I'd gone 550 00:30:08,080 --> 00:30:10,720 Speaker 1: in that long period of time between captain and major. 551 00:30:10,840 --> 00:30:13,320 Speaker 1: After you've commanded, you have a significant amount of time. 552 00:30:13,360 --> 00:30:16,200 Speaker 1: I went back and taught at West Point. Frankly, my 553 00:30:16,400 --> 00:30:19,240 Speaker 1: alma mater, Harvard Business School, I felt did not have 554 00:30:19,400 --> 00:30:26,560 Speaker 1: a strong finance program. So I actually wanted, oh I know, 555 00:30:26,680 --> 00:30:31,640 Speaker 1: I actually wanted to learn more about the tough part 556 00:30:31,760 --> 00:30:34,280 Speaker 1: of finance, which was going through a revolution in the eighties. 557 00:30:34,320 --> 00:30:37,000 Speaker 1: As you remember, the rocket scientists were coming out. The 558 00:30:37,040 --> 00:30:40,280 Speaker 1: derivatives were now being calculated. You didn't get there at Harvard, 559 00:30:40,960 --> 00:30:43,680 Speaker 1: We didn't that that's tough to the school up the 560 00:30:43,760 --> 00:30:47,440 Speaker 1: Charles River that maybe could along the way. No, that's 561 00:30:47,440 --> 00:30:51,480 Speaker 1: exactly right. M I T and Sloan really got hard 562 00:30:51,560 --> 00:30:56,440 Speaker 1: on that, as did Wharton at Carnegie Mellon and exactly 563 00:30:57,040 --> 00:30:59,440 Speaker 1: and and being an engineer by background from West Point, 564 00:30:59,480 --> 00:31:02,120 Speaker 1: I really wanted to learn the math, and God bless 565 00:31:02,160 --> 00:31:04,720 Speaker 1: my holma mater, but that was general management, and I 566 00:31:04,840 --> 00:31:06,880 Speaker 1: was teaching finance, and I just felt it was important 567 00:31:06,880 --> 00:31:11,040 Speaker 1: to know much more than my students. Well, Mark, Tracy, Patrick, Kimmit, 568 00:31:11,200 --> 00:31:13,760 Speaker 1: Kommas c f A. Let me. I'm gonna get to 569 00:31:13,840 --> 00:31:18,080 Speaker 1: the gossip. I can't think of anyone more qualified to 570 00:31:18,200 --> 00:31:20,760 Speaker 1: pick up the pieces of the White House press room 571 00:31:21,400 --> 00:31:24,480 Speaker 1: than you. We have a president who has an affinity 572 00:31:24,680 --> 00:31:28,840 Speaker 1: for people with eagles and stars on their shoulders. We've 573 00:31:28,880 --> 00:31:32,880 Speaker 1: had a Donnie Brook. Whatever anybody's politics within the press room, 574 00:31:33,200 --> 00:31:36,840 Speaker 1: have you been contacted by General Kelly to take over 575 00:31:36,960 --> 00:31:41,160 Speaker 1: the things you are experienced at, which is communicating with 576 00:31:41,320 --> 00:31:44,120 Speaker 1: the press in the public, Well, I haven't, And I've 577 00:31:44,120 --> 00:31:46,920 Speaker 1: got the greatest respect for John Kelly. I've served side 578 00:31:46,960 --> 00:31:49,640 Speaker 1: by side with him before, but I think you said 579 00:31:49,640 --> 00:31:51,080 Speaker 1: that there are a lot of generals there. I spent 580 00:31:51,160 --> 00:31:55,000 Speaker 1: a year as the spokesman in Iraq, and uh, that's 581 00:31:55,080 --> 00:31:59,800 Speaker 1: enough for me see that cold silence days. Why don't 582 00:31:59,800 --> 00:32:03,760 Speaker 1: you after I just destroyed the conversation, I want to 583 00:32:04,160 --> 00:32:07,000 Speaker 1: get your sense of of how cohesive you think that 584 00:32:07,040 --> 00:32:09,360 Speaker 1: the national security team is within the White House. Now, 585 00:32:09,400 --> 00:32:11,320 Speaker 1: there was all of the palace intrigue at the beginning 586 00:32:11,400 --> 00:32:13,600 Speaker 1: about some people want to go one direction, others wanting 587 00:32:13,640 --> 00:32:16,760 Speaker 1: to go another. Tom mentioned some of the principles involved 588 00:32:16,800 --> 00:32:19,080 Speaker 1: in all this. Do you feel like it's it's cohering, 589 00:32:19,120 --> 00:32:21,520 Speaker 1: it's working as a team today, Well, I think we're 590 00:32:21,520 --> 00:32:26,240 Speaker 1: going to go through another round of departures. John Kelly 591 00:32:26,280 --> 00:32:28,440 Speaker 1: again is enormously talented. He knows how to be a 592 00:32:28,520 --> 00:32:33,200 Speaker 1: chief of staff. He doesn't brook gossip, he doesn't brook leaks. 593 00:32:33,480 --> 00:32:35,480 Speaker 1: Some people I think are going to try to testament 594 00:32:35,600 --> 00:32:38,560 Speaker 1: and they'll probably find themselves on the other side of 595 00:32:38,600 --> 00:32:41,800 Speaker 1: the street. Um on the issue of national security, I 596 00:32:41,880 --> 00:32:45,440 Speaker 1: think is more important. We probably have the most talented, 597 00:32:46,160 --> 00:32:50,520 Speaker 1: experienced group of national security professionals handling this crisis right now. 598 00:32:51,080 --> 00:32:55,280 Speaker 1: And I don't mean Ivory Tower intellectuals. I don't mean 599 00:32:55,760 --> 00:33:00,840 Speaker 1: cruise missile liberals. I mean people that understand not only war, 600 00:33:01,000 --> 00:33:04,600 Speaker 1: but understand the cost of war. In that that significant 601 00:33:04,640 --> 00:33:10,600 Speaker 1: group before Maddis Dunford at the Pentagon, Kelly McMaster at 602 00:33:11,000 --> 00:33:13,160 Speaker 1: the White House. Those are the people I want helping 603 00:33:13,720 --> 00:33:17,200 Speaker 1: to make the decisions because they're sober minded enough to 604 00:33:17,320 --> 00:33:19,920 Speaker 1: know what the real costs are of going to war 605 00:33:20,000 --> 00:33:22,360 Speaker 1: in Korea. For goodness sakes, and God bless him, John 606 00:33:22,440 --> 00:33:26,120 Speaker 1: Kelly lost his son in Iraq. These are experienced professionals 607 00:33:26,600 --> 00:33:29,680 Speaker 1: that don't look at war as a theoretical construct. They 608 00:33:29,960 --> 00:33:32,719 Speaker 1: have fought it, they know the cost of it, they 609 00:33:32,760 --> 00:33:35,200 Speaker 1: know how to fight it if necessary. So I think 610 00:33:35,280 --> 00:33:37,720 Speaker 1: the President has the opportunity to get the best advice 611 00:33:37,800 --> 00:33:39,840 Speaker 1: in the world on this issue. With regards to Korea. 612 00:33:40,000 --> 00:33:42,360 Speaker 1: I know that you worked on plans and strategy at 613 00:33:42,400 --> 00:33:44,600 Speaker 1: sent Com and and there's a lot of conversation here 614 00:33:44,640 --> 00:33:47,880 Speaker 1: about how we resolve this crisis on the Korean peninsula diplomatically, 615 00:33:47,920 --> 00:33:50,320 Speaker 1: get folks back to the negotiating the table, but help 616 00:33:50,400 --> 00:33:53,280 Speaker 1: us understands militarily how this might be playing out behind 617 00:33:53,320 --> 00:33:55,480 Speaker 1: the scenes. That We've seen the rhetoric on Twitter about 618 00:33:55,760 --> 00:33:58,680 Speaker 1: how equipped, how capable that the the US forces are 619 00:33:58,960 --> 00:34:01,120 Speaker 1: in terms of military traategy. Where do things stand? Do 620 00:34:01,160 --> 00:34:03,800 Speaker 1: you think? Well, first of all, I think everybody needs 621 00:34:03,840 --> 00:34:05,920 Speaker 1: to start breathing through their mouths and their noses and 622 00:34:06,040 --> 00:34:09,520 Speaker 1: just relax a bit and understand the center of gravity 623 00:34:09,640 --> 00:34:13,920 Speaker 1: of this fight is Kim Jong il's desire, Kim Jong 624 00:34:14,040 --> 00:34:18,960 Speaker 1: UN's desire to maintain and perpetuate his regime. He may 625 00:34:19,080 --> 00:34:23,160 Speaker 1: be a little bit crazy, but he's not suicidal. So 626 00:34:23,600 --> 00:34:27,840 Speaker 1: in my mind, we have got to recognize that what 627 00:34:28,760 --> 00:34:30,640 Speaker 1: all of this acting out on this part and all 628 00:34:30,680 --> 00:34:33,560 Speaker 1: this nuclear development is for one reason alone, and that's 629 00:34:33,600 --> 00:34:36,640 Speaker 1: to keep the Chinese out and keep the Koreans, the 630 00:34:36,719 --> 00:34:40,279 Speaker 1: South Koreans, and the Americans out. So if you start 631 00:34:40,320 --> 00:34:43,080 Speaker 1: from that premise, you realize that you've got to meet 632 00:34:43,200 --> 00:34:47,839 Speaker 1: him not only capability for capability, but also word for word, 633 00:34:48,080 --> 00:34:50,640 Speaker 1: and hopefully that will put him back into a position 634 00:34:50,680 --> 00:34:55,719 Speaker 1: where he is no longer a threat uh to the region. Uh. 635 00:34:56,200 --> 00:34:57,799 Speaker 1: Do you do you think that that's likely? I mean 636 00:34:57,880 --> 00:34:59,800 Speaker 1: that the principles of all changing, We've got a new present, 637 00:34:59,840 --> 00:35:01,600 Speaker 1: there's a new leader in South Korea of course a 638 00:35:01,640 --> 00:35:04,040 Speaker 1: new leader in North Korea as well. Are you optimistic 639 00:35:04,080 --> 00:35:06,520 Speaker 1: that we can get back to the negotiating table. Well, well, 640 00:35:06,560 --> 00:35:08,520 Speaker 1: I am, but I think we've got to understand we're 641 00:35:08,560 --> 00:35:11,720 Speaker 1: taking a different negotiating tone. I mean, the fact remains 642 00:35:12,239 --> 00:35:14,520 Speaker 1: this speak softly and carry a big stick has done 643 00:35:14,600 --> 00:35:18,400 Speaker 1: nothing for the last fifteen twenty years to halt his development. 644 00:35:18,440 --> 00:35:22,560 Speaker 1: He's violated every agreement that he's ever UM signed up to, 645 00:35:23,360 --> 00:35:26,600 Speaker 1: and frankly, I think we just have to take a 646 00:35:26,680 --> 00:35:28,800 Speaker 1: different tack. I think it's important to recognize that this 647 00:35:28,920 --> 00:35:32,440 Speaker 1: rhetoric of the president was not simply meant for North Korea, 648 00:35:32,800 --> 00:35:35,719 Speaker 1: it was also meant for China as well. And the 649 00:35:35,800 --> 00:35:38,240 Speaker 1: message is clear and simple. You want me to handle 650 00:35:38,320 --> 00:35:40,480 Speaker 1: this or do you guys want to handle it? General, 651 00:35:40,600 --> 00:35:43,360 Speaker 1: thank you so much, Mark Kim and General kivin with 652 00:35:43,560 --> 00:35:49,120 Speaker 1: us today. We greatly appreciate from our studios studios in Washington. 653 00:36:01,280 --> 00:36:04,800 Speaker 1: This is always a joy. He is the most interesting 654 00:36:04,960 --> 00:36:07,800 Speaker 1: pedigreed to wander his way to the White House and 655 00:36:08,160 --> 00:36:11,800 Speaker 1: within that out to boost school in Chicago through Milton Academy, 656 00:36:12,840 --> 00:36:16,680 Speaker 1: through UM. Thank he did, okay, and then on on 657 00:36:16,840 --> 00:36:19,880 Speaker 1: the m I t as well. Austin Gelsi joins us 658 00:36:19,920 --> 00:36:22,680 Speaker 1: now on our phone line, Austin, wonderful to talk to you. 659 00:36:22,880 --> 00:36:26,719 Speaker 1: Our our theme here today has been our labor economy. 660 00:36:26,880 --> 00:36:31,680 Speaker 1: You've lived this and particularly with your council to President Obama, 661 00:36:32,239 --> 00:36:36,600 Speaker 1: there is an individual streak across all of America where 662 00:36:36,640 --> 00:36:40,920 Speaker 1: the individuals we do it alone, lazy, freer, free market. 663 00:36:41,000 --> 00:36:44,560 Speaker 1: We don't need institutions to help us. Where do we 664 00:36:44,719 --> 00:36:49,879 Speaker 1: stand on that in two thousand seventeen, Well for having 665 00:36:49,960 --> 00:36:53,759 Speaker 1: me back, I saw you ment. I've wandered through the 666 00:36:53,880 --> 00:36:57,319 Speaker 1: labor because I got a job and uh, and then 667 00:36:57,400 --> 00:37:00,920 Speaker 1: I had to come back and refine that job when 668 00:37:00,960 --> 00:37:04,720 Speaker 1: I got out of Washington. Uh. You know, I think 669 00:37:04,920 --> 00:37:12,080 Speaker 1: that we still have a major cultural push toward that 670 00:37:12,440 --> 00:37:20,120 Speaker 1: individualism and the rise of the gig economy and working 671 00:37:20,480 --> 00:37:25,359 Speaker 1: part time, filling in scratches at it's a little bit. 672 00:37:25,560 --> 00:37:28,320 Speaker 1: I think that's why there's there's more taste for the 673 00:37:29,000 --> 00:37:33,840 Speaker 1: for the rise of the gig economy among workers maybe 674 00:37:33,960 --> 00:37:38,960 Speaker 1: than than among the press, let's call it. But as 675 00:37:39,080 --> 00:37:43,000 Speaker 1: you know, the economy has moved a little more to 676 00:37:43,160 --> 00:37:47,080 Speaker 1: teams and teams teams and joint work are are a 677 00:37:47,239 --> 00:37:51,680 Speaker 1: bigger they're bigger factor in the economy now than uh, 678 00:37:52,480 --> 00:37:56,480 Speaker 1: certainly than they have been in recent times. Maybe if ever, 679 00:37:57,160 --> 00:37:59,560 Speaker 1: and we've had a little bit of devin to adjust 680 00:37:59,640 --> 00:38:02,480 Speaker 1: to that. I had some time to adjust to that. 681 00:38:02,480 --> 00:38:04,520 Speaker 1: I wonder if'gotten any better at measuring it. We talked 682 00:38:04,520 --> 00:38:06,600 Speaker 1: to Alan Krueger from time to time on the show 683 00:38:06,640 --> 00:38:09,440 Speaker 1: your former colleague about his work on the gig economy. 684 00:38:09,480 --> 00:38:12,000 Speaker 1: How how much better are we at measuring the effects 685 00:38:12,040 --> 00:38:14,560 Speaker 1: on the labor economy of part time work of these 686 00:38:14,600 --> 00:38:18,480 Speaker 1: new gigs. Yes, and we're not great about measuring it, 687 00:38:18,960 --> 00:38:24,479 Speaker 1: partly because the people themselves working those gigs don't think 688 00:38:24,560 --> 00:38:28,400 Speaker 1: of them as regular jobs. The elective and so then 689 00:38:28,760 --> 00:38:33,200 Speaker 1: the current population survey, which is the big survey where 690 00:38:33,239 --> 00:38:38,160 Speaker 1: we get the unemployment rate every month. They've gone back 691 00:38:38,239 --> 00:38:42,920 Speaker 1: and looked at the administrative records, and Alan Krueger and 692 00:38:43,040 --> 00:38:47,680 Speaker 1: others owned them. Specifically, their own research shows I think 693 00:38:47,719 --> 00:38:49,719 Speaker 1: a quarter or a third of the people who are 694 00:38:49,800 --> 00:38:52,120 Speaker 1: working those gig jobs that when they're asked do you 695 00:38:52,280 --> 00:38:54,960 Speaker 1: have do you have a job? They don't count those 696 00:38:55,040 --> 00:38:58,320 Speaker 1: as their jobs. So so our measurement is not perfect. 697 00:39:00,040 --> 00:39:02,399 Speaker 1: Scares a little bit here where we've got to both 698 00:39:02,520 --> 00:39:04,880 Speaker 1: both Houses a Congress on recess. Right now, the President 699 00:39:04,960 --> 00:39:07,799 Speaker 1: up in Bedminster, Uh, enjoying so much as you can 700 00:39:07,880 --> 00:39:10,320 Speaker 1: a seventeen day working vacation. They're gonna come back and 701 00:39:10,400 --> 00:39:12,040 Speaker 1: have to deal with the dead ceiling. And you've been 702 00:39:12,560 --> 00:39:14,800 Speaker 1: in the White House as all of this unfolded, the 703 00:39:15,520 --> 00:39:18,040 Speaker 1: now regular debate over how to raise it, when to 704 00:39:18,120 --> 00:39:20,919 Speaker 1: raise it, if to do it cleanly or otherwise. What's 705 00:39:20,960 --> 00:39:24,040 Speaker 1: your counsel to this new administration about how to go 706 00:39:24,120 --> 00:39:26,040 Speaker 1: about this, how to speak with a unified voice on 707 00:39:26,120 --> 00:39:31,640 Speaker 1: that issue in particular. Look, the thing is, we have 708 00:39:31,960 --> 00:39:35,560 Speaker 1: never been in the circumstance that we're about to be in. 709 00:39:36,320 --> 00:39:41,160 Speaker 1: And by that I mean there there have a few 710 00:39:41,360 --> 00:39:46,839 Speaker 1: times been fights over the dead ceiling, but never when 711 00:39:46,960 --> 00:39:50,400 Speaker 1: the party of the president and both houses of Congress 712 00:39:50,440 --> 00:39:54,680 Speaker 1: are the same. Because normally they're on the same page 713 00:39:55,000 --> 00:39:58,080 Speaker 1: and they can pass a budget. They what they look, 714 00:39:58,160 --> 00:40:01,560 Speaker 1: They see that the dead ceil. Fighting over the dead 715 00:40:01,640 --> 00:40:07,000 Speaker 1: ceiling doesn't really make any logical sense. Congress itself has 716 00:40:07,120 --> 00:40:10,560 Speaker 1: already passed the laws that they're then trying to say, no, 717 00:40:10,760 --> 00:40:14,560 Speaker 1: we won't pay the bills for these laws. So normally, 718 00:40:15,560 --> 00:40:18,480 Speaker 1: if they're all the same party, they just quietly passed 719 00:40:18,520 --> 00:40:20,880 Speaker 1: an increase in the dead ceiling, and they attached it 720 00:40:21,000 --> 00:40:24,600 Speaker 1: to a build that's building a bridge of something. Then 721 00:40:24,680 --> 00:40:26,800 Speaker 1: this let no one ever speak of it again and 722 00:40:26,920 --> 00:40:31,120 Speaker 1: they move on. And so I thought that's what they 723 00:40:31,160 --> 00:40:34,280 Speaker 1: would do. And I guess my advice to the president 724 00:40:34,440 --> 00:40:39,759 Speaker 1: would be would have been just go talk to Mitch 725 00:40:39,880 --> 00:40:42,520 Speaker 1: McConnell behind the scenes and be quiet about it and 726 00:40:42,920 --> 00:40:47,160 Speaker 1: just get it done. Uh. I guess I don't understand 727 00:40:47,440 --> 00:40:52,680 Speaker 1: the logic that while you're on vacation you would come 728 00:40:52,760 --> 00:40:55,400 Speaker 1: in and just do a little bit of Twitter and 729 00:40:55,480 --> 00:40:58,920 Speaker 1: attack Mitch McConnell and say that he's a hypocrite and 730 00:40:58,960 --> 00:41:03,520 Speaker 1: can't get his job done. And um, because now when 731 00:41:03,600 --> 00:41:05,600 Speaker 1: they come back, you need him. You need him to 732 00:41:05,719 --> 00:41:09,400 Speaker 1: quietly go change the change the rules and raise the 733 00:41:09,480 --> 00:41:12,320 Speaker 1: dead sailing. Austin goes a minute here, and then we 734 00:41:12,360 --> 00:41:14,440 Speaker 1: want to come back and dive into other themes. How 735 00:41:14,520 --> 00:41:16,640 Speaker 1: critical is it for Kevin Hassett to dark at the 736 00:41:16,680 --> 00:41:20,560 Speaker 1: door at the White House? I mean, this process is Look, 737 00:41:20,640 --> 00:41:23,040 Speaker 1: you and I are friends with Kevin, and I disagree 738 00:41:23,080 --> 00:41:28,080 Speaker 1: with Kevin on a politics, but he's a reasonable guy. 739 00:41:28,800 --> 00:41:33,000 Speaker 1: He's sensible, you know. I think the bigger issue will 740 00:41:33,080 --> 00:41:36,319 Speaker 1: be that they should pass him. They should put him 741 00:41:36,320 --> 00:41:39,640 Speaker 1: in the White House. Boy, did the president should start 742 00:41:39,719 --> 00:41:43,399 Speaker 1: listening to him? Um, I don't know that that he's 743 00:41:43,440 --> 00:41:46,120 Speaker 1: going to but you know we we can all keep 744 00:41:46,160 --> 00:41:49,719 Speaker 1: our fingers in Austin. Now we go in August where 745 00:41:49,840 --> 00:41:56,560 Speaker 1: parents dare to tread. We consider your pedigree. Milton Academy 746 00:41:56,680 --> 00:41:59,879 Speaker 1: dare to be true a member of the debate team, 747 00:42:00,200 --> 00:42:04,320 Speaker 1: the Massachusetts Forensic League, the National Forensic League, the Catholic 748 00:42:04,400 --> 00:42:09,280 Speaker 1: Forensic League, and the Debate Association of New England Independent Schools. 749 00:42:09,760 --> 00:42:12,680 Speaker 1: This is the time of year Austin where parents lean 750 00:42:12,760 --> 00:42:15,440 Speaker 1: across the table and say to their children, you know, 751 00:42:15,520 --> 00:42:18,880 Speaker 1: you really ought to join the debate team. Help us 752 00:42:18,960 --> 00:42:21,640 Speaker 1: with this, Austin. What was the first state like at 753 00:42:21,719 --> 00:42:25,920 Speaker 1: Milton Academy when young Gulsby walked in and what's going 754 00:42:26,000 --> 00:42:32,719 Speaker 1: to debate? How scared were you? Well? I did? Uh? 755 00:42:33,360 --> 00:42:37,560 Speaker 1: I mostly in high school did speech events, uh, rather 756 00:42:37,600 --> 00:42:40,880 Speaker 1: than debate events. It was still nerve racking because you 757 00:42:40,960 --> 00:42:43,800 Speaker 1: gotta you gotta memorize the speech. They gave you a 758 00:42:43,880 --> 00:42:46,920 Speaker 1: thirty minutes, they gave you a topic and you had 759 00:42:46,960 --> 00:42:53,440 Speaker 1: to write and memorize the thing speaking. But you know 760 00:42:53,680 --> 00:42:57,880 Speaker 1: the thing is, boy, I'm glad I signed up. I 761 00:42:58,000 --> 00:43:00,080 Speaker 1: can't even remember how I ended up in that, but 762 00:43:00,600 --> 00:43:04,440 Speaker 1: but it ended up being good for life, you know, 763 00:43:04,840 --> 00:43:10,160 Speaker 1: just being able to express yourself in a way that's clear, 764 00:43:10,280 --> 00:43:14,719 Speaker 1: making argument. The society never gets tired of that. Well, 765 00:43:15,040 --> 00:43:17,960 Speaker 1: and then you took a step to the artificial intelligence 766 00:43:18,000 --> 00:43:20,880 Speaker 1: and the robots they still haven't figured out how to replace. 767 00:43:21,040 --> 00:43:23,400 Speaker 1: Then Austin, you took a step down academically. You went 768 00:43:23,440 --> 00:43:27,319 Speaker 1: from Milton Academy to a small school in New Haven, Connecticut. 769 00:43:27,719 --> 00:43:29,800 Speaker 1: So you go to Yale and you're doing the debate 770 00:43:29,880 --> 00:43:32,720 Speaker 1: thing and that How does being on the debate team 771 00:43:33,360 --> 00:43:36,759 Speaker 1: line up your brain? What? What is the process when 772 00:43:36,800 --> 00:43:41,239 Speaker 1: you're a kid where that debate or speech experience helps 773 00:43:41,280 --> 00:43:44,320 Speaker 1: you line up things in your head? Well, you're getting 774 00:43:44,760 --> 00:43:47,960 Speaker 1: you're getting deep on me, Tom, Well you're the chance 775 00:43:48,040 --> 00:43:49,719 Speaker 1: that one look you come on, you wan the whole 776 00:43:49,760 --> 00:43:54,239 Speaker 1: thing organized. You gotta be organized, you gotta be logical. Uh. 777 00:43:55,160 --> 00:44:00,520 Speaker 1: It turns out that one of my main iv ols 778 00:44:01,200 --> 00:44:05,960 Speaker 1: uh in debate when I was in college, that we 779 00:44:06,320 --> 00:44:09,799 Speaker 1: would beat regularly, I might add, was none other than 780 00:44:10,000 --> 00:44:14,160 Speaker 1: Ted Cruz. This editor from Texas and uh so I 781 00:44:14,280 --> 00:44:16,960 Speaker 1: got a lot of funny stories about him. So you know, 782 00:44:17,360 --> 00:44:21,680 Speaker 1: part of part of any event like debate, I think 783 00:44:22,719 --> 00:44:27,840 Speaker 1: is getting your mind ready logical and organized, but parts 784 00:44:27,880 --> 00:44:30,000 Speaker 1: also the people you work with. You know you're working. 785 00:44:30,000 --> 00:44:31,600 Speaker 1: You spent a lot of time working on that. But 786 00:44:31,840 --> 00:44:34,600 Speaker 1: you know, high school, I probably spent more time working 787 00:44:34,680 --> 00:44:37,560 Speaker 1: on the speech and debate stuff than all my classes. 788 00:44:38,200 --> 00:44:41,080 Speaker 1: Uh and you know, I don't know if if I 789 00:44:41,200 --> 00:44:43,640 Speaker 1: probably should have been doing my homework more. But yeah, 790 00:44:43,640 --> 00:44:45,840 Speaker 1: I know you slept off. Would you stop at Austin? 791 00:44:45,920 --> 00:44:48,239 Speaker 1: You're killing me? He went on. Folks to the m 792 00:44:48,320 --> 00:44:50,239 Speaker 1: I t or Stan Fisher said, yeah, we'll give you 793 00:44:50,239 --> 00:44:53,000 Speaker 1: a PhD. Okay, why not David here into the lecture 794 00:44:53,280 --> 00:44:56,319 Speaker 1: on critical thinking skills in August? Why don't you bring 795 00:44:56,440 --> 00:44:59,759 Speaker 1: us back to something more useful Austin. You you came 796 00:44:59,800 --> 00:45:02,640 Speaker 1: in a government after a career in academia. We've got 797 00:45:02,840 --> 00:45:04,759 Speaker 1: folks in this administration now, a lot of whom have 798 00:45:04,880 --> 00:45:07,680 Speaker 1: not served in government before. What did you learn about 799 00:45:08,200 --> 00:45:12,360 Speaker 1: that relationship between the executive branch and the legislative branch? 800 00:45:12,400 --> 00:45:15,840 Speaker 1: About working with Congress? How how hard was it to 801 00:45:15,960 --> 00:45:19,600 Speaker 1: learn your way down Pennsylvania Avenue up to the Capitol. Well, 802 00:45:19,840 --> 00:45:24,360 Speaker 1: you know, they usually wouldn't release me without an escort, 803 00:45:24,600 --> 00:45:27,600 Speaker 1: you know, over a tigress. But that that's okay. Um. 804 00:45:28,680 --> 00:45:33,759 Speaker 1: I think presidents can take different approaches and the uh 805 00:45:34,120 --> 00:45:39,960 Speaker 1: toward Congress. Some like President Obama are very policy oriented 806 00:45:40,440 --> 00:45:43,360 Speaker 1: and they come up with a lot of specific ideas 807 00:45:43,440 --> 00:45:46,200 Speaker 1: that they have allies and Congress and they say, look, 808 00:45:46,239 --> 00:45:49,480 Speaker 1: here's the president's plan for a B and C. Others 809 00:45:50,200 --> 00:45:53,560 Speaker 1: have followed a model that I thought Donald Trump was following, 810 00:45:53,719 --> 00:45:58,279 Speaker 1: which is the White House itself doesn't really have any 811 00:45:58,520 --> 00:46:01,839 Speaker 1: details or doesn't have that that many and so they 812 00:46:01,880 --> 00:46:06,640 Speaker 1: would be more reflecting what Kyras. Kyras would put up 813 00:46:06,680 --> 00:46:09,880 Speaker 1: the details and they would they would sign bills or 814 00:46:10,280 --> 00:46:15,120 Speaker 1: or you know, focus more on management. Um, I was 815 00:46:15,160 --> 00:46:18,759 Speaker 1: wrong about that. They haven't managed the White House very 816 00:46:18,840 --> 00:46:23,920 Speaker 1: well and they haven't put forward policy. And I guess 817 00:46:24,080 --> 00:46:28,880 Speaker 1: my summary is I don't think that the White House 818 00:46:29,040 --> 00:46:33,680 Speaker 1: realizes that most everything that you're gonna be able to 819 00:46:33,880 --> 00:46:38,560 Speaker 1: do happens in a pretty short window right at the beginning, 820 00:46:39,200 --> 00:46:42,600 Speaker 1: and then as you get to the first midderm, I 821 00:46:42,880 --> 00:46:46,000 Speaker 1: think they're gonna find the same thing Barack Obama found 822 00:46:46,280 --> 00:46:49,840 Speaker 1: and George Bush before that, and others before that. You 823 00:46:49,960 --> 00:46:52,560 Speaker 1: come to the election and the president will say, hey, 824 00:46:53,600 --> 00:46:56,400 Speaker 1: why don't I come down and help your campaign? And 825 00:46:56,600 --> 00:46:59,000 Speaker 1: then the people in starts saying, oh, no, you know what, 826 00:46:59,440 --> 00:47:01,839 Speaker 1: we know are really busy. Why don't you not come 827 00:47:01,920 --> 00:47:04,440 Speaker 1: down here? Why don't you in fact, don't tell anyone 828 00:47:04,560 --> 00:47:08,319 Speaker 1: you know me and don't save my name because they 829 00:47:08,440 --> 00:47:11,960 Speaker 1: all read the polls the same as we do. And 830 00:47:13,520 --> 00:47:16,080 Speaker 1: after the first year, I think it's hard to do anything. 831 00:47:16,440 --> 00:47:19,200 Speaker 1: And I don't think the White House. Yeah, I don't 832 00:47:19,200 --> 00:47:21,960 Speaker 1: think that White House has factored that in fully. Austin 833 00:47:21,960 --> 00:47:24,279 Speaker 1: Austin who goes we know debate. We enjoy having you 834 00:47:24,400 --> 00:47:27,120 Speaker 1: with us. He is from the Bush School in Chicago. 835 00:47:27,160 --> 00:47:30,080 Speaker 1: Austin goesby, thank you so much, this wanting. He's a 836 00:47:30,160 --> 00:47:42,680 Speaker 1: former chairman of the President's Council of Economic Advisers. Thanks 837 00:47:42,760 --> 00:47:46,879 Speaker 1: for listening to the Bloomberg Savannas podcast. Subscribe and listen 838 00:47:46,920 --> 00:47:52,560 Speaker 1: to interviews on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whichever podcast platform 839 00:47:52,640 --> 00:47:55,960 Speaker 1: you prefer. I'm on Twitter at Tom Keene. David Gura 840 00:47:56,520 --> 00:48:00,280 Speaker 1: is that David Gura? Before the podcast? You can always 841 00:48:00,320 --> 00:48:02,960 Speaker 1: catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio