WEBVTT - Ukraine, Inflation, ETFs, and Adobe (Podcast)

0:00:00.760 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day, we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:15.560
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.560 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.120
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. We're gonna check in

0:00:22.120 --> 0:00:25.640
<v Speaker 1>with Kevin Brand. Kevin's a Defense policy ann also Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:00:25.680 --> 0:00:27.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't know Kevin, and I thought I knew everyone

0:00:27.480 --> 0:00:30.200
<v Speaker 1>at BI. That's because he just recently joined. He's at

0:00:30.440 --> 0:00:34.559
<v Speaker 1>twenty nine year Navy vetter. Whoa, I mean, what's up

0:00:34.600 --> 0:00:38.160
<v Speaker 1>with that? Kevin? Twenty nine years? Thank you for your service. Yeah,

0:00:38.159 --> 0:00:40.360
<v Speaker 1>thank you for your service. But twenty nine years, I mean,

0:00:40.360 --> 0:00:42.360
<v Speaker 1>you got it. You had to be the old guy, right, Yeah.

0:00:42.360 --> 0:00:43.720
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't figure out what I was gonna do when

0:00:43.720 --> 0:00:47.120
<v Speaker 1>I grew up. Kevin, You're you've been in this defense

0:00:47.159 --> 0:00:51.080
<v Speaker 1>game a long time in the Navy, with experience in

0:00:51.240 --> 0:00:56.160
<v Speaker 1>security strategy. You've got so much experience. When you look

0:00:56.240 --> 0:00:58.960
<v Speaker 1>back on this last year in Ukraine, what are some

0:00:59.000 --> 0:01:01.600
<v Speaker 1>of your key takeaways? Yeah, I tell you it's it's

0:01:01.600 --> 0:01:03.200
<v Speaker 1>really sad. You know, we here, we are one year

0:01:03.240 --> 0:01:06.720
<v Speaker 1>into the conflict, and this is a you know, a

0:01:06.800 --> 0:01:09.680
<v Speaker 1>war of choice by by mister Putin just to satisfy

0:01:09.720 --> 0:01:12.320
<v Speaker 1>his zone ego, kind of restore the borders of what

0:01:12.400 --> 0:01:15.080
<v Speaker 1>he sees as the former Soviet Empire, and he's caused,

0:01:15.120 --> 0:01:17.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, untold suffering on the country of Ukraine. We're

0:01:17.319 --> 0:01:21.440
<v Speaker 1>talking about one trillion dollars in potential infrastructure repairs that

0:01:21.520 --> 0:01:24.280
<v Speaker 1>have to be done to the country, Over eight million refugees,

0:01:24.280 --> 0:01:28.880
<v Speaker 1>primarily in Poland and Germany, five million displaced persons, you know,

0:01:29.720 --> 0:01:32.360
<v Speaker 1>thousands of deaths, Yeah, hundreds of thousands of deaths on

0:01:32.400 --> 0:01:36.480
<v Speaker 1>both sides, all for really a war of choice, completely unnecessary,

0:01:36.600 --> 0:01:43.160
<v Speaker 1>just tragic. But my question, Kevin is who could possibly

0:01:43.240 --> 0:01:45.280
<v Speaker 1>see an end to this? I've seen, I've read so

0:01:45.280 --> 0:01:47.920
<v Speaker 1>many stories over the past few days about how this

0:01:47.960 --> 0:01:49.440
<v Speaker 1>war is going to end, what it's going to take

0:01:49.480 --> 0:01:52.000
<v Speaker 1>for this war to end, and I just can't imagine

0:01:53.000 --> 0:01:55.240
<v Speaker 1>one year into it, people are willing to write that

0:01:55.400 --> 0:02:00.240
<v Speaker 1>we were in Vietnam for at least seven or eight years, right, right,

0:02:00.920 --> 0:02:04.880
<v Speaker 1>we were in Afghanistan for thirteen years. Now they're different

0:02:04.880 --> 0:02:08.400
<v Speaker 1>they're all different situations. But Russia was in Afghanistan for

0:02:08.520 --> 0:02:12.560
<v Speaker 1>nine years during their conflict. Why would anybody think, especially

0:02:12.560 --> 0:02:16.639
<v Speaker 1>with Vladimir Putin, who acts to you know, somewhere between

0:02:18.080 --> 0:02:22.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, a megalomaniac dictator and a cornered animal, why

0:02:22.800 --> 0:02:25.359
<v Speaker 1>would anyone think he has any reason to get out

0:02:25.400 --> 0:02:29.240
<v Speaker 1>other than total loss for him. Yeah, I think that's

0:02:29.280 --> 0:02:31.760
<v Speaker 1>the difficulty here. I mean this is this is definitely

0:02:31.800 --> 0:02:34.600
<v Speaker 1>a choice by Putin to have invaded Ukraine. I think

0:02:34.639 --> 0:02:38.440
<v Speaker 1>there's some difficulty associated with the US geopolitical position and

0:02:38.520 --> 0:02:40.800
<v Speaker 1>that of our Western allies that we didn't really be

0:02:40.840 --> 0:02:44.160
<v Speaker 1>more forceful in twenty fourteen during the annexation of Crimea.

0:02:44.200 --> 0:02:48.160
<v Speaker 1>I think that's set a precedent. Unfortunately, the precedent here

0:02:48.240 --> 0:02:50.160
<v Speaker 1>that is most important, and what I think is most

0:02:50.200 --> 0:02:55.079
<v Speaker 1>important for the international community, is upholding this standard that

0:02:55.160 --> 0:02:57.880
<v Speaker 1>we're not going to allow countries to forcibly change borders,

0:02:58.200 --> 0:03:02.560
<v Speaker 1>to force their will on others by using military force.

0:03:02.680 --> 0:03:04.919
<v Speaker 1>That's an Interestion state, I think is galvanized Europe. I

0:03:04.919 --> 0:03:07.800
<v Speaker 1>think it's very positive to see NATO coming together the

0:03:07.880 --> 0:03:10.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, Finland and Sweden about ready to join NATO.

0:03:10.800 --> 0:03:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Turkey willing to reintertalks. That's positive. But as far as

0:03:14.680 --> 0:03:16.799
<v Speaker 1>what convinces Putin to a band of this, he has

0:03:16.840 --> 0:03:20.880
<v Speaker 1>to fundamentally be defeated on the battlefield first and foremost.

0:03:20.919 --> 0:03:23.400
<v Speaker 1>He needs to be defeated personally. I can't imagine that

0:03:23.440 --> 0:03:26.120
<v Speaker 1>he backs away from this until he's thrown out of

0:03:26.120 --> 0:03:29.760
<v Speaker 1>office or dies. Yeah, I think this is going to

0:03:29.840 --> 0:03:32.920
<v Speaker 1>be very difficult. If you look at mister Putin, he

0:03:32.960 --> 0:03:35.760
<v Speaker 1>seems to have secured his power base. He's definitely an oligarch,

0:03:35.800 --> 0:03:40.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, he's a dictator authoritarian government. Absent some sort

0:03:40.480 --> 0:03:43.080
<v Speaker 1>of popular revolt, it's going to be very difficult to

0:03:43.120 --> 0:03:46.160
<v Speaker 1>remove him from power. So the only way to stop

0:03:46.160 --> 0:03:49.040
<v Speaker 1>this invasion is mister Putin's internal calculation has to be

0:03:49.280 --> 0:03:51.480
<v Speaker 1>that he can no longer achieve his results, and that

0:03:51.520 --> 0:03:54.920
<v Speaker 1>means the West really has to provide for Ukrainians defense,

0:03:55.120 --> 0:03:58.640
<v Speaker 1>and Ukraine must secure their borders and repel the Russian

0:03:58.880 --> 0:04:03.160
<v Speaker 1>from their territorial kevin Land space. What role do you

0:04:03.200 --> 0:04:07.760
<v Speaker 1>think China should play, will play, could play in the

0:04:07.880 --> 0:04:11.680
<v Speaker 1>netcoming year. Yeah, that's a great question. This is you know,

0:04:11.760 --> 0:04:17.680
<v Speaker 1>this is a very important international political contest. We have

0:04:17.720 --> 0:04:21.800
<v Speaker 1>authoritarian regimes out there revisionist powers who are wanting to

0:04:21.960 --> 0:04:27.720
<v Speaker 1>use force to achieve their national will. The West, the

0:04:27.760 --> 0:04:30.039
<v Speaker 1>international community has to stand up to that. When you

0:04:30.080 --> 0:04:35.000
<v Speaker 1>look at China ran to a lesser extent in North Korea.

0:04:35.480 --> 0:04:38.840
<v Speaker 1>The West has to galvanize international support to punish those

0:04:38.839 --> 0:04:41.400
<v Speaker 1>sort of behaviors. I think it's positive development that China

0:04:41.480 --> 0:04:45.200
<v Speaker 1>has so far not provided obstensibly lethal aid, but it

0:04:45.240 --> 0:04:48.320
<v Speaker 1>would be. It would be. One of the things I

0:04:48.320 --> 0:04:50.200
<v Speaker 1>think we need to see is China step up to

0:04:50.200 --> 0:04:53.039
<v Speaker 1>the plate and be a little bit more proactive besides

0:04:53.040 --> 0:04:56.479
<v Speaker 1>just offering a piece plan, be more proactive in pushing

0:04:56.520 --> 0:04:59.880
<v Speaker 1>back against Russia, both in the United Nations Security Council

0:05:00.040 --> 0:05:03.520
<v Speaker 1>and sort of internationally public diplomacy. Peace boys. Hey, Kevin,

0:05:03.560 --> 0:05:06.880
<v Speaker 1>we also have Maria todayo joining us. She's Bloomberg Television.

0:05:06.960 --> 0:05:10.440
<v Speaker 1>She is reporting today live from Kiev. Lets live from Kiev.

0:05:10.520 --> 0:05:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Let's bring Maria in. Maria, thank you so much for

0:05:12.920 --> 0:05:15.279
<v Speaker 1>joining us. Um. I know you've spent a lot of

0:05:15.279 --> 0:05:20.240
<v Speaker 1>time in Kiev, in Poland on trains interacting with Ukrainians.

0:05:20.760 --> 0:05:23.640
<v Speaker 1>What's the mood today one year in what is their

0:05:23.760 --> 0:05:32.560
<v Speaker 1>level of resolve? Hopefully we have Maria, but sometimes she's

0:05:32.600 --> 0:05:35.039
<v Speaker 1>in war zone. Yeah, no, it doesn't sound well. First

0:05:35.080 --> 0:05:37.559
<v Speaker 1>of all, your microphones off, okay, thank you. And second

0:05:37.600 --> 0:05:40.640
<v Speaker 1>of all, we're we don't have Maria now. She is

0:05:40.680 --> 0:05:45.719
<v Speaker 1>in the capitol and it is Fortress city, so it

0:05:45.839 --> 0:05:48.800
<v Speaker 1>doesn't I don't think that we have any kind of

0:05:48.839 --> 0:05:51.520
<v Speaker 1>war zone issues, but we do have your typical global

0:05:51.560 --> 0:05:56.480
<v Speaker 1>telecommunications problems. Producer Eric mullis as we got her back. Maria.

0:05:56.920 --> 0:05:59.719
<v Speaker 1>You have been after I think a seventeen hour train

0:06:00.240 --> 0:06:04.320
<v Speaker 1>reporting live from the capital of Ukraine, Kiev, and Paul

0:06:04.440 --> 0:06:06.560
<v Speaker 1>was wondering, you know, the people that you talk to

0:06:07.080 --> 0:06:08.760
<v Speaker 1>on the train, the people that you talk to in

0:06:08.800 --> 0:06:13.080
<v Speaker 1>the streets, what's what's there feeling? One Ye're in yes,

0:06:13.200 --> 0:06:15.080
<v Speaker 1>and listen. I have to apologize because I know the

0:06:15.120 --> 0:06:17.880
<v Speaker 1>lines are dropping, but really this is also part of it,

0:06:18.320 --> 0:06:20.560
<v Speaker 1>is the reality of it. And we're not even using

0:06:20.560 --> 0:06:25.760
<v Speaker 1>our real phones here pretty much for security essentially. I think,

0:06:25.800 --> 0:06:29.440
<v Speaker 1>to me, what is just incredible of the story is,

0:06:29.640 --> 0:06:31.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, you get on this train from Poland and

0:06:31.839 --> 0:06:33.960
<v Speaker 1>then you're making your way to Ukraine, and then at

0:06:34.000 --> 0:06:37.719
<v Speaker 1>one point I catch myself thinking, wow, it's one am

0:06:37.720 --> 0:06:39.440
<v Speaker 1>in the morning. This train is full. You know, you're

0:06:39.480 --> 0:06:43.360
<v Speaker 1>in this little carriage with four other people, and then

0:06:43.400 --> 0:06:45.599
<v Speaker 1>it just hits you. You know, we're all women here.

0:06:45.720 --> 0:06:48.440
<v Speaker 1>And then at that point you ask why are you

0:06:48.480 --> 0:06:51.160
<v Speaker 1>going there to this women? And then what's your situation?

0:06:51.240 --> 0:06:53.240
<v Speaker 1>And then they tell you, well, I'm either going to

0:06:53.240 --> 0:06:55.359
<v Speaker 1>see a relative where I'm going back to my husband,

0:06:55.440 --> 0:06:57.000
<v Speaker 1>or I had to come to Poland because there is

0:06:57.040 --> 0:06:59.680
<v Speaker 1>no visa process in Ukraine. And that's when it really

0:06:59.760 --> 0:07:02.560
<v Speaker 1>hid to the men cannot leave. It's the women that

0:07:02.600 --> 0:07:05.520
<v Speaker 1>are going in and out to their country. A lot

0:07:05.520 --> 0:07:09.160
<v Speaker 1>of these world husbands are fighting or they expect that

0:07:09.160 --> 0:07:12.840
<v Speaker 1>they will be called to some extent to fight this year,

0:07:12.920 --> 0:07:16.160
<v Speaker 1>particularly in the spring. And then you get to Ukraine

0:07:16.200 --> 0:07:18.960
<v Speaker 1>and the reality hit too. You see the first man

0:07:19.000 --> 0:07:21.480
<v Speaker 1>actually that you interact for many hours, or all dressed

0:07:21.480 --> 0:07:24.720
<v Speaker 1>in military year. They ask for your papers for passports,

0:07:24.760 --> 0:07:26.280
<v Speaker 1>they let you in, and then of course from that

0:07:26.320 --> 0:07:28.400
<v Speaker 1>point on you start to see the scenery. As you

0:07:28.520 --> 0:07:32.560
<v Speaker 1>enter kivs Bucha. We don't know the massacre that happened there.

0:07:32.800 --> 0:07:35.320
<v Speaker 1>Then you go into Rapine, which is just outside and

0:07:35.360 --> 0:07:37.520
<v Speaker 1>there was active fighting there, and that's when you really

0:07:37.560 --> 0:07:41.320
<v Speaker 1>realize the Russians were just so close to Kiev. Then

0:07:41.360 --> 0:07:43.000
<v Speaker 1>you see the airports that they had to blow up.

0:07:43.000 --> 0:07:45.680
<v Speaker 1>Remember the initial plan from the Russians was to take

0:07:45.720 --> 0:07:51.000
<v Speaker 1>hold of the airports and helicopter people from Belarus into Ukraine.

0:07:51.040 --> 0:07:53.640
<v Speaker 1>And that's the reality of the war. I think yesterday

0:07:53.760 --> 0:07:57.600
<v Speaker 1>for us on PubL the reality check. You see it firsthand,

0:07:57.640 --> 0:07:59.320
<v Speaker 1>and you're on this train and the train next to

0:07:59.400 --> 0:08:01.800
<v Speaker 1>you it's ready to send the weapons. And this is

0:08:01.840 --> 0:08:04.040
<v Speaker 1>a train that's really next to you as you're making

0:08:04.080 --> 0:08:07.480
<v Speaker 1>your way into Ukraine for seventeen hours. The airspace obviously

0:08:07.520 --> 0:08:10.080
<v Speaker 1>shut now for a year because of the missile strikes.

0:08:10.120 --> 0:08:13.440
<v Speaker 1>I think for today we heard already from Pricedent Lanski,

0:08:13.480 --> 0:08:16.160
<v Speaker 1>who was given out medals in the morning, to the

0:08:16.360 --> 0:08:19.160
<v Speaker 1>army again repeating the reason why we'll starts standing a

0:08:19.240 --> 0:08:21.160
<v Speaker 1>year later is because of our army and they have

0:08:21.320 --> 0:08:24.800
<v Speaker 1>beat in blood. So that I'm here, Slanski's here, is

0:08:24.800 --> 0:08:27.280
<v Speaker 1>the press that we're all here reporting this. It's because

0:08:27.280 --> 0:08:29.760
<v Speaker 1>of the huge fight that the army has put up

0:08:29.800 --> 0:08:31.600
<v Speaker 1>with a lot of weapons from the West. Sure, but

0:08:31.640 --> 0:08:33.960
<v Speaker 1>the reality is the soldiers that are dying there. And

0:08:34.120 --> 0:08:36.360
<v Speaker 1>the one thing that also really caught my eyes when

0:08:36.360 --> 0:08:39.440
<v Speaker 1>you look at Ukrainian TV the way they present this

0:08:39.720 --> 0:08:41.839
<v Speaker 1>is not the one year mark. It's not the one

0:08:41.920 --> 0:08:46.720
<v Speaker 1>year anniversary. What they say is one year now to victory.

0:08:47.480 --> 0:08:51.200
<v Speaker 1>All right, Maria Today, reporting live from Kiev. I know

0:08:51.320 --> 0:08:54.880
<v Speaker 1>you spoke with the mayor this morning, Vitali Klitschko, So

0:08:54.920 --> 0:08:56.760
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk to you about that later. We

0:08:56.760 --> 0:08:59.040
<v Speaker 1>can get you back on the program. And then Kevin

0:08:59.080 --> 0:09:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Brand he is Defense Policy and Bloomberg Intelligence, We're going

0:09:02.280 --> 0:09:05.120
<v Speaker 1>to get you back as well, because this is obviously

0:09:05.160 --> 0:09:09.000
<v Speaker 1>such an important issue geo politically, and we definitely want

0:09:09.040 --> 0:09:12.679
<v Speaker 1>to get all caught up on the one year anniversary

0:09:13.360 --> 0:09:18.200
<v Speaker 1>of this tragic war. How do we keep supplying Ukraine?

0:09:18.240 --> 0:09:20.839
<v Speaker 1>It seems like they're just going through munitions as you

0:09:20.880 --> 0:09:24.160
<v Speaker 1>would expect. Do we and the West have the capability

0:09:24.200 --> 0:09:28.960
<v Speaker 1>to continue to replenish their bullets and shells and tanks

0:09:29.000 --> 0:09:30.800
<v Speaker 1>and all that kind of stuff. Well, I think for

0:09:30.840 --> 0:09:32.960
<v Speaker 1>the short term absolutely, you know, we really don't have

0:09:32.960 --> 0:09:35.760
<v Speaker 1>a choice in this matter. It's sort of an existential

0:09:35.760 --> 0:09:39.160
<v Speaker 1>threat to Ukraine, and really the only thing that's bolstering

0:09:39.200 --> 0:09:42.800
<v Speaker 1>their defense forces is the Western weapons that are flowing in,

0:09:42.800 --> 0:09:45.440
<v Speaker 1>including some of the former Soviet Bloc countries that still

0:09:45.440 --> 0:09:48.559
<v Speaker 1>have some Eastern former Soviet sort of slide weapons that

0:09:48.600 --> 0:09:50.360
<v Speaker 1>we're able to do to kind of keep them in

0:09:50.360 --> 0:09:52.400
<v Speaker 1>the game. But that's the critical thing as we look

0:09:52.440 --> 0:09:56.000
<v Speaker 1>forward at this, you know, barring a return of the

0:09:56.080 --> 0:09:58.480
<v Speaker 1>Russian advance or that if they're able to get better

0:09:58.640 --> 0:10:01.080
<v Speaker 1>and moved into territory, what we really have to prepare

0:10:01.080 --> 0:10:03.440
<v Speaker 1>for is the Ukrainian counter offensive, which is probably going

0:10:03.520 --> 0:10:06.520
<v Speaker 1>to kick off later to spring, and so the importance

0:10:06.520 --> 0:10:09.680
<v Speaker 1>of getting those arms and weapons into Ukraine and get

0:10:09.679 --> 0:10:12.000
<v Speaker 1>them trained up ready to use them before that spring

0:10:12.000 --> 0:10:13.800
<v Speaker 1>offensive kicks off is kind of the number one problem

0:10:13.880 --> 0:10:18.840
<v Speaker 1>right now. I imagine that the US military just has

0:10:18.880 --> 0:10:24.079
<v Speaker 1>amazing capabilities in terms of supply chain management, and we

0:10:24.120 --> 0:10:27.320
<v Speaker 1>have the tools to get everything there right I mean,

0:10:27.360 --> 0:10:30.640
<v Speaker 1>we have more aircraft carriers and anybody else than everybody

0:10:30.640 --> 0:10:35.079
<v Speaker 1>else in the world combined, I believe. So is that

0:10:35.120 --> 0:10:38.400
<v Speaker 1>what's happening right now? Are we utilizing the Army and

0:10:38.440 --> 0:10:41.000
<v Speaker 1>the Navy to get them the gear that they need

0:10:41.040 --> 0:10:43.280
<v Speaker 1>as quickly as possible. Well, I think you've got a

0:10:43.320 --> 0:10:46.600
<v Speaker 1>combination of a couple things. So we're energizing the contractor base.

0:10:46.679 --> 0:10:49.760
<v Speaker 1>There's lots of security assistance dollars that are on contract

0:10:49.840 --> 0:10:52.440
<v Speaker 1>right now to get industry to ramp up production both

0:10:52.440 --> 0:10:55.000
<v Speaker 1>to resupply the US arsenal. Plus we'll also have the

0:10:55.040 --> 0:10:58.440
<v Speaker 1>ability to move weapons from the US arsenal these presidential

0:10:58.480 --> 0:11:01.640
<v Speaker 1>drawdowns that you've heard about, and move actually US weapons

0:11:01.640 --> 0:11:04.520
<v Speaker 1>stocks in through the supply chain and get those two Ukraine,

0:11:04.760 --> 0:11:06.880
<v Speaker 1>not to mention what's already the NATO countries are providing,

0:11:06.920 --> 0:11:09.720
<v Speaker 1>So there's enough arms and ammunitions to keep Ukraine's supply,

0:11:09.840 --> 0:11:11.880
<v Speaker 1>but we are starting to dip down into US and

0:11:11.960 --> 0:11:17.079
<v Speaker 1>NATO inventories. How concerned are you, Kevin about I mean,

0:11:17.080 --> 0:11:20.320
<v Speaker 1>this is clearly a well in some ways, it's a

0:11:20.360 --> 0:11:25.200
<v Speaker 1>proxy war between Russia and NATO. Right, How concerned are

0:11:25.240 --> 0:11:30.079
<v Speaker 1>you that that escalates into a hot war because I

0:11:30.440 --> 0:11:34.120
<v Speaker 1>feel like we've been watching China, but it looks like

0:11:34.160 --> 0:11:37.199
<v Speaker 1>this could be an an active threat that happens even

0:11:37.320 --> 0:11:40.640
<v Speaker 1>even sooner. No, this is serious concern. I think everyone

0:11:40.720 --> 0:11:42.520
<v Speaker 1>is watching that closely, and there's always a risk of

0:11:42.679 --> 0:11:45.480
<v Speaker 1>escalation when you get in and Russia has been clearly

0:11:45.480 --> 0:11:47.760
<v Speaker 1>signaling that they're unhappy with what the West is doing.

0:11:48.600 --> 0:11:52.040
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I think the West has made its

0:11:52.080 --> 0:11:54.760
<v Speaker 1>position clear. This is about the defense of Ukraine. This

0:11:54.840 --> 0:11:59.520
<v Speaker 1>is about Russia's unprovoked aggression against Ukraine, the violation of

0:11:59.600 --> 0:12:02.360
<v Speaker 1>territory borders, and this is what the international community stands

0:12:02.400 --> 0:12:05.440
<v Speaker 1>up for. Right non interference in the international affairs of others,

0:12:06.160 --> 0:12:09.439
<v Speaker 1>no forceful movement of borders by use of military force.

0:12:09.840 --> 0:12:12.760
<v Speaker 1>And so these are core international principles that are at

0:12:12.800 --> 0:12:15.839
<v Speaker 1>stake here, and the West really does need to step up, Kevin,

0:12:15.880 --> 0:12:18.160
<v Speaker 1>I guess in terms of stepping up, the next big,

0:12:18.200 --> 0:12:24.440
<v Speaker 1>big leap would be providing air cover, air force jets

0:12:24.600 --> 0:12:27.480
<v Speaker 1>F sixteens. What are the pros and cons that you

0:12:27.520 --> 0:12:30.800
<v Speaker 1>think our leaders are weighing right now, and how do

0:12:30.800 --> 0:12:32.600
<v Speaker 1>you think that's what we'll play out? Well, I think

0:12:32.600 --> 0:12:34.440
<v Speaker 1>you hit the nail on the head earlier. There's always

0:12:34.480 --> 0:12:36.280
<v Speaker 1>a risk of escalation. You know, what sort of weapon

0:12:36.320 --> 0:12:38.640
<v Speaker 1>systems do we bring? What is Russer's response to that?

0:12:39.080 --> 0:12:41.720
<v Speaker 1>I think we've had sort of an incremental approach to this,

0:12:42.080 --> 0:12:45.640
<v Speaker 1>increasing arms, longer range, arms, more lethal aid. I think

0:12:45.760 --> 0:12:48.200
<v Speaker 1>air support is next. When you think about a Ukrainian

0:12:48.200 --> 0:12:51.560
<v Speaker 1>offensive that's upcoming, you really have to have a combination

0:12:51.679 --> 0:12:56.000
<v Speaker 1>of infantry supported by armor, artillery and air support, not

0:12:56.120 --> 0:12:59.319
<v Speaker 1>just unmanned airs and sort of reconnaissance because golos you

0:12:59.400 --> 0:13:01.679
<v Speaker 1>need to have tact fighters that can provide close air

0:13:01.720 --> 0:13:04.040
<v Speaker 1>support to those troops. So I think it's inevitable. The

0:13:04.120 --> 0:13:06.320
<v Speaker 1>question is just a matter of time before the West

0:13:06.360 --> 0:13:09.319
<v Speaker 1>commits to that. Do we always have to pre announce

0:13:09.400 --> 0:13:15.480
<v Speaker 1>this stuff? Is that a part of, you know, avoiding escalation?

0:13:15.600 --> 0:13:17.920
<v Speaker 1>We say we're going to do it, we float that balloon,

0:13:18.000 --> 0:13:20.560
<v Speaker 1>and then we eventually do. Or is it possible that

0:13:20.600 --> 0:13:24.520
<v Speaker 1>we give them give the Ukrainians fighter jets to use

0:13:24.520 --> 0:13:27.640
<v Speaker 1>in the offensive without telling anybody and upping the element

0:13:27.679 --> 0:13:32.440
<v Speaker 1>of surprise. It's possible, But you know, these sort of

0:13:32.440 --> 0:13:36.480
<v Speaker 1>deliberations are so complex. Inside the National Security Council, they're

0:13:36.520 --> 0:13:38.400
<v Speaker 1>weighing the pros and cons are looking at the risk

0:13:38.440 --> 0:13:43.480
<v Speaker 1>of escalation. It's very, very hard to hide these moves.

0:13:43.600 --> 0:13:45.959
<v Speaker 1>So even if we didn't announce them publicly, which I

0:13:45.960 --> 0:13:48.600
<v Speaker 1>think would be a mistake, but even if we didn't,

0:13:48.679 --> 0:13:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Russia would clearly know that we're doing it. The information

0:13:51.040 --> 0:13:53.920
<v Speaker 1>would get out. So I think it's really the deliberate

0:13:53.960 --> 0:13:56.319
<v Speaker 1>process by which the NSC and the White House, the

0:13:56.360 --> 0:13:59.679
<v Speaker 1>Administration needs to go through, work with our NATO partners,

0:13:59.679 --> 0:14:01.720
<v Speaker 1>and then term of what the best air assets to

0:14:01.800 --> 0:14:06.440
<v Speaker 1>provide are from an intelligence perspective, Kevin, how do you

0:14:06.720 --> 0:14:08.640
<v Speaker 1>what do you believe or how good do you think

0:14:08.679 --> 0:14:11.240
<v Speaker 1>our capabilities are in that part of the world. And

0:14:11.360 --> 0:14:16.160
<v Speaker 1>are we providing intelligence support for the Ukrainians? Absolutely, I

0:14:16.160 --> 0:14:18.240
<v Speaker 1>think that's one of the key things that we're actually

0:14:18.280 --> 0:14:21.600
<v Speaker 1>providing the Ukrainians besides the arms in Western is that

0:14:21.640 --> 0:14:25.520
<v Speaker 1>intelligence support. I mean, they clearly know the adversary better

0:14:25.560 --> 0:14:27.720
<v Speaker 1>than any of us. They're on the ground, they're there,

0:14:28.040 --> 0:14:30.520
<v Speaker 1>But the non technical means that we have the satellite

0:14:31.000 --> 0:14:35.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of surveillance, the overflight capability that we have the UAVs,

0:14:35.240 --> 0:14:39.240
<v Speaker 1>we are providing pretty critical intelligence that helps them tactically

0:14:39.280 --> 0:14:42.240
<v Speaker 1>and operationally make decisions on the ground as to where

0:14:42.280 --> 0:14:45.480
<v Speaker 1>they need to defend, where Russia is massing troops, where

0:14:45.520 --> 0:14:48.000
<v Speaker 1>they need to reallocate resources. And I think that's absolutely

0:14:48.000 --> 0:14:52.119
<v Speaker 1>critical to Ukraine's defense. You got your master's National Security

0:14:52.200 --> 0:14:57.960
<v Speaker 1>policy from the National War College US Naval War College.

0:14:59.360 --> 0:15:03.040
<v Speaker 1>How much did they talk about China then and how

0:15:03.120 --> 0:15:04.800
<v Speaker 1>much of a threat do you think China is now?

0:15:04.840 --> 0:15:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Because I know an Air Force general recently said we

0:15:07.920 --> 0:15:11.280
<v Speaker 1>could have war with them in twenty twenty five. Absolutely,

0:15:11.360 --> 0:15:14.120
<v Speaker 1>so China, China and Russia. I mean China to the

0:15:14.200 --> 0:15:16.720
<v Speaker 1>most part has been sort of the premiere up and

0:15:16.760 --> 0:15:22.040
<v Speaker 1>coming long term strategic competitor for the United States least

0:15:22.080 --> 0:15:25.920
<v Speaker 1>going back fifteen twenty years in military parlance. The national

0:15:25.920 --> 0:15:28.320
<v Speaker 1>security establishment really focused on that more recently in the

0:15:28.400 --> 0:15:31.320
<v Speaker 1>last ten years. But absolutely that's the up and coming

0:15:31.800 --> 0:15:34.600
<v Speaker 1>challenge that we've got from a great power competition perspective. Hey, Kevin,

0:15:34.640 --> 0:15:38.440
<v Speaker 1>we're fortune once again have Maria todayo joining us live

0:15:38.520 --> 0:15:40.960
<v Speaker 1>from Kiev, so we want to go to her. Maria,

0:15:41.040 --> 0:15:43.160
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for you know, dialing, and we know

0:15:43.240 --> 0:15:47.400
<v Speaker 1>it's hectic there. I believe you recently sat down with

0:15:47.560 --> 0:15:50.560
<v Speaker 1>the mayor of Fatal. Yeah, the mayor of Kiev. Could

0:15:50.600 --> 0:15:53.120
<v Speaker 1>you tell us just gives a little color about what

0:15:53.160 --> 0:15:56.600
<v Speaker 1>you learn from your discussion. Yeah, and he was here

0:15:56.640 --> 0:15:59.480
<v Speaker 1>this morning with us a clitch car. Obviously, you know

0:15:59.520 --> 0:16:03.200
<v Speaker 1>the two others. At this point, they've become something of

0:16:03.280 --> 0:16:06.760
<v Speaker 1>a popular icon here and they have been also in

0:16:06.800 --> 0:16:09.280
<v Speaker 1>a number of European countries because they speak for German,

0:16:09.680 --> 0:16:11.880
<v Speaker 1>and they have it pretty smart in fact, to reach

0:16:11.920 --> 0:16:14.440
<v Speaker 1>out to Germany and speak in Germany and reach out

0:16:14.480 --> 0:16:16.160
<v Speaker 1>to the German media because they knew that a lot

0:16:16.200 --> 0:16:19.600
<v Speaker 1>of the weapons, the key to unlock the heavy weapons

0:16:19.680 --> 0:16:22.880
<v Speaker 1>would be in Berlin. Which also speaks to the fact

0:16:23.000 --> 0:16:25.960
<v Speaker 1>that when you look overall at the Ukrainian government and

0:16:26.080 --> 0:16:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Zelenski's doing this in real time, he was doing a

0:16:28.440 --> 0:16:31.200
<v Speaker 1>press conference a lot of international media. When you look

0:16:31.200 --> 0:16:34.160
<v Speaker 1>at the foreign minister who's speaking today at the United Nations,

0:16:34.400 --> 0:16:38.560
<v Speaker 1>it's almost this new generation of Ukrainian politicians who get

0:16:38.680 --> 0:16:40.880
<v Speaker 1>very well that they need to have a big media

0:16:40.920 --> 0:16:43.640
<v Speaker 1>presence and that they need to gather message across and

0:16:43.680 --> 0:16:47.480
<v Speaker 1>this was something that for Zelenski was obvious for day one.

0:16:47.600 --> 0:16:50.080
<v Speaker 1>If they wanted to really survive, they needed to make

0:16:50.120 --> 0:16:53.360
<v Speaker 1>this a global story. And it has been now for

0:16:53.480 --> 0:17:00.720
<v Speaker 1>a year now we are seeing pictures presences like the

0:17:00.840 --> 0:17:04.520
<v Speaker 1>cell the cell phone call has dropped, and as Maria

0:17:04.600 --> 0:17:08.320
<v Speaker 1>told us, you know, she and U producer Oliver Krook

0:17:08.400 --> 0:17:14.400
<v Speaker 1>traveled into Ukraine. They had to uh leave their actual

0:17:14.720 --> 0:17:17.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, personal cell phones and business cell phones at

0:17:17.080 --> 0:17:21.760
<v Speaker 1>the border, so they took in m communication devices that

0:17:22.119 --> 0:17:25.879
<v Speaker 1>are not necessarily reliable. Hopefully we can get her back.

0:17:26.800 --> 0:17:30.159
<v Speaker 1>But she was talking about the importance of you know,

0:17:30.840 --> 0:17:34.199
<v Speaker 1>the clich goes have have been huge Kevin in in

0:17:34.440 --> 0:17:39.080
<v Speaker 1>building support as well as obviously Zelenski. Do you think

0:17:39.119 --> 0:17:44.160
<v Speaker 1>that that support still is the popular support still um

0:17:44.200 --> 0:17:46.679
<v Speaker 1>as big as it was when this war started a

0:17:46.760 --> 0:17:50.600
<v Speaker 1>year ago? Has it waned at all? No? You know,

0:17:50.680 --> 0:17:53.040
<v Speaker 1>it's always difficult to tell, and that's always a risk

0:17:53.080 --> 0:17:55.679
<v Speaker 1>that you lose popular support and backing and that you know,

0:17:55.920 --> 0:17:59.119
<v Speaker 1>the implications go with that in a democratic uh, you know,

0:18:00.480 --> 0:18:03.479
<v Speaker 1>environment is difficult in order to maintain support. But I

0:18:03.520 --> 0:18:06.119
<v Speaker 1>would say, actually, what we've seen as a strengthening the

0:18:06.240 --> 0:18:08.920
<v Speaker 1>uniting of NATO and the uniting of Europe behind this

0:18:09.280 --> 0:18:12.640
<v Speaker 1>and behind the international principles involved. So I actually look

0:18:12.640 --> 0:18:15.119
<v Speaker 1>at this as a very positive sort of step forward.

0:18:15.720 --> 0:18:19.439
<v Speaker 1>And Kevin, realistically, what do other NATO countries, what can

0:18:19.520 --> 0:18:21.920
<v Speaker 1>they provide? What are they providing? How much can we

0:18:22.600 --> 0:18:27.760
<v Speaker 1>as a you know, really depend upon them for real material? Yeah?

0:18:27.760 --> 0:18:29.280
<v Speaker 1>So I think there's two things. There's one, there's the

0:18:29.320 --> 0:18:32.639
<v Speaker 1>international support, the aligning of NATO sort of the getting

0:18:32.680 --> 0:18:35.000
<v Speaker 1>back to basics as to what the alliance is for,

0:18:35.280 --> 0:18:38.000
<v Speaker 1>and that's absolutely critical. The second thing is this stepping

0:18:38.080 --> 0:18:40.960
<v Speaker 1>up in the defense budgets the nations across the NATO

0:18:41.040 --> 0:18:43.240
<v Speaker 1>are coming back to their two percent pledges. They're plussing

0:18:43.320 --> 0:18:45.720
<v Speaker 1>up their defense budgets. That's great for the Alliance. The

0:18:45.800 --> 0:18:47.879
<v Speaker 1>third thing, though, to your point directly, is they have

0:18:47.960 --> 0:18:51.760
<v Speaker 1>tons of arms and ammunition available, especially small arms. That

0:18:51.920 --> 0:18:55.600
<v Speaker 1>is critical for the infantry sup fight infantry fight. They

0:18:55.640 --> 0:18:58.320
<v Speaker 1>have the ability to provide non technical means. They have

0:18:58.359 --> 0:19:00.720
<v Speaker 1>the ability to provide logistic support. They have the ability

0:19:00.720 --> 0:19:03.760
<v Speaker 1>to provide humanitarian support. All that comes together, I think

0:19:03.760 --> 0:19:06.960
<v Speaker 1>and provides a very important backing for Ukraine. All Right,

0:19:07.000 --> 0:19:09.320
<v Speaker 1>we have Maria today, O back. I believe Maria, if

0:19:09.320 --> 0:19:13.199
<v Speaker 1>you're there, talk to us about the push for fighter jets.

0:19:13.280 --> 0:19:18.480
<v Speaker 1>I know that Ukraine has been not only behind obviously publicly,

0:19:18.480 --> 0:19:21.880
<v Speaker 1>but also behind the scenes on a daily basis trying

0:19:21.880 --> 0:19:25.440
<v Speaker 1>to get air support. Yeah. Absolutely. And you know, Matt,

0:19:25.720 --> 0:19:27.960
<v Speaker 1>when you listen to the Ukrainian FOREM Minister at the

0:19:27.960 --> 0:19:31.520
<v Speaker 1>Midriku level, who's just before the United Nations, he says,

0:19:31.720 --> 0:19:34.919
<v Speaker 1>Ukraine when this board started had a checklist almost of

0:19:34.960 --> 0:19:36.760
<v Speaker 1>the seven things that they needed, the seven type of

0:19:36.800 --> 0:19:39.040
<v Speaker 1>weapons that they needed, and he says, at this point

0:19:39.160 --> 0:19:43.040
<v Speaker 1>we've crossed six. The red lines have been crossed repeatedly.

0:19:43.040 --> 0:19:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Remember there was major fear of tanks. And funnily enough,

0:19:45.880 --> 0:19:49.399
<v Speaker 1>they're now making their way from Poland into Ukraine. And

0:19:49.400 --> 0:19:51.080
<v Speaker 1>it's funny. When I was on the train, see that

0:19:51.200 --> 0:19:54.760
<v Speaker 1>in the train to Poland to Ukraine, there's another lane,

0:19:54.920 --> 0:19:57.440
<v Speaker 1>huge lane where all of this equipment is just crossing

0:19:57.520 --> 0:19:59.439
<v Speaker 1>the border. And that's when it really hits you that

0:19:59.560 --> 0:20:02.480
<v Speaker 1>this is real and these weapons are massive. They're enormous.

0:20:02.720 --> 0:20:04.439
<v Speaker 1>Seeing the one thing they need is alluded to is

0:20:04.440 --> 0:20:07.040
<v Speaker 1>the fighter jets. This is still an open debate and

0:20:07.520 --> 0:20:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Ukrainians will say the rational for this is that they

0:20:10.040 --> 0:20:13.399
<v Speaker 1>want to make a big push to get back essentially

0:20:13.440 --> 0:20:16.040
<v Speaker 1>the twenty percent around the country that Russia right now

0:20:16.119 --> 0:20:18.359
<v Speaker 1>controls and the east and going down to the south.

0:20:18.680 --> 0:20:21.560
<v Speaker 1>And to do that, they argue, you need to have

0:20:22.080 --> 0:20:24.720
<v Speaker 1>a position from the ear that allows your soldiers to

0:20:24.800 --> 0:20:27.879
<v Speaker 1>move in freely and obviously with less of confrontation with

0:20:27.960 --> 0:20:29.679
<v Speaker 1>trips on the ground. And they also say the long

0:20:29.760 --> 0:20:33.280
<v Speaker 1>range missiles also do that. They provide cover and support

0:20:33.640 --> 0:20:36.360
<v Speaker 1>two soldiers that are on the ground. It's very difficult

0:20:36.359 --> 0:20:39.160
<v Speaker 1>to make inroads if you don't have the backup from

0:20:39.320 --> 0:20:42.240
<v Speaker 1>aviation and the long range missiles this is an ongoing story,

0:20:42.480 --> 0:20:44.080
<v Speaker 1>but they continue to push for it. And if you

0:20:44.160 --> 0:20:46.120
<v Speaker 1>look at the track record, you know, Matt I would

0:20:46.160 --> 0:20:48.040
<v Speaker 1>not be surprised if they get them again. They had

0:20:48.040 --> 0:20:52.400
<v Speaker 1>seven things they wanted, they have six for the time being. Hey, Maria,

0:20:52.840 --> 0:20:55.400
<v Speaker 1>can you give us the latest what you're hearing from

0:20:55.440 --> 0:21:01.840
<v Speaker 1>government officials about casualties, casualty rates, expectations. Kind of because

0:21:01.840 --> 0:21:05.320
<v Speaker 1>we're again one year into this. Look, this is the

0:21:05.320 --> 0:21:09.040
<v Speaker 1>biggest secret and you understand why for Ukrainians to put

0:21:09.040 --> 0:21:13.000
<v Speaker 1>out a number of dead soldiers, to put out a

0:21:13.080 --> 0:21:16.399
<v Speaker 1>total number of population that here we all know the

0:21:16.480 --> 0:21:19.840
<v Speaker 1>number is probably great and it is a big number.

0:21:19.880 --> 0:21:22.520
<v Speaker 1>And this is the secrecy that goes on in every

0:21:22.520 --> 0:21:25.440
<v Speaker 1>war in US is Ukraine, in any war, the act

0:21:25.480 --> 0:21:27.800
<v Speaker 1>of government will do everything that I can to make

0:21:27.840 --> 0:21:36.159
<v Speaker 1>sure that those numbers be precisive for that effective moral. Understandably,

0:21:36.240 --> 0:21:38.600
<v Speaker 1>we've lost Maria yet again. So it's just kind of

0:21:38.600 --> 0:21:42.000
<v Speaker 1>what we've become accustomed to in Kiev because communications there

0:21:42.040 --> 0:21:46.119
<v Speaker 1>are very tenuous at best. Um, Kevin, as we just

0:21:46.200 --> 0:21:48.920
<v Speaker 1>heard from Maria, you know, the the you know, the

0:21:49.240 --> 0:21:52.840
<v Speaker 1>the push is to get some aircraft in there, so um,

0:21:52.880 --> 0:21:54.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, we'll have to see how that plays out.

0:21:54.280 --> 0:21:56.800
<v Speaker 1>But we just want to thank Kevin Brand, defense policy

0:21:56.800 --> 0:21:59.639
<v Speaker 1>annalyst for Bloomberg Intelligence, joining us on the phone from

0:21:59.640 --> 0:22:03.080
<v Speaker 1>marsh in DC and Maria TODAYO on the ground in

0:22:04.359 --> 0:22:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Kiev was some on the ground reporting. We appreciate both

0:22:07.560 --> 0:22:10.040
<v Speaker 1>there and again, Matt, this one year anniversary of the

0:22:10.080 --> 0:22:13.119
<v Speaker 1>invasion by Russia of Ukraine. Yeah, and it's interesting to

0:22:13.160 --> 0:22:15.840
<v Speaker 1>also hear from Maria not only about travel into Kiev

0:22:15.920 --> 0:22:19.199
<v Speaker 1>and the mood on the ground there, but about the

0:22:19.240 --> 0:22:23.560
<v Speaker 1>push for more weaponry and the armor that she sees

0:22:24.119 --> 0:22:29.159
<v Speaker 1>rolling in, and to hear from Kevin as well about

0:22:29.200 --> 0:22:33.520
<v Speaker 1>the counter offensive that we expect to come in the

0:22:33.640 --> 0:22:36.679
<v Speaker 1>not too distant future. That's what the armors rolling in

0:22:36.720 --> 0:22:39.399
<v Speaker 1>there for. And I guess the question now is how

0:22:39.480 --> 0:22:42.280
<v Speaker 1>much damage they can do and how quickly they can

0:22:42.320 --> 0:22:44.560
<v Speaker 1>do it in order to hurt the Russian offensive and

0:22:44.600 --> 0:22:49.880
<v Speaker 1>to hurt Russian morale. But the market is certainly saying,

0:22:50.520 --> 0:22:52.959
<v Speaker 1>all right, this inflation is here. It's a little bit

0:22:53.000 --> 0:22:55.080
<v Speaker 1>hotter than we thought. That means fed's going to be

0:22:55.840 --> 0:22:58.040
<v Speaker 1>potentially higher for longer, and that's kind of what we're

0:22:58.040 --> 0:22:59.840
<v Speaker 1>seeing in the market here. The snp off one points

0:23:00.200 --> 0:23:02.840
<v Speaker 1>percent the two year treasury again, we've touched four point

0:23:02.880 --> 0:23:04.959
<v Speaker 1>eight two percent. We're now at four point seven nine

0:23:05.000 --> 0:23:07.280
<v Speaker 1>percent on the two year. Let's bring in somebody who

0:23:07.280 --> 0:23:10.520
<v Speaker 1>does this stuff for a living. Alex Schalloff, cohead of

0:23:10.680 --> 0:23:15.000
<v Speaker 1>investment Strategies at Bernstein Private Wealth Management. Alex, thanks so

0:23:15.119 --> 0:23:17.359
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us here. God, we've looked back on

0:23:17.400 --> 0:23:20.120
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty two. It was ugly. I don't care where

0:23:20.119 --> 0:23:23.000
<v Speaker 1>you are. Equities, fixed income, tough time, tough time to

0:23:23.080 --> 0:23:25.560
<v Speaker 1>make money. Here we are in twenty twenty three, started

0:23:25.560 --> 0:23:28.600
<v Speaker 1>off a little bit pretty darn good in January. What

0:23:28.680 --> 0:23:32.440
<v Speaker 1>are you telling your clients these days? I think, good morning, guys.

0:23:32.680 --> 0:23:35.200
<v Speaker 1>I think we're probably a little bit ahead of ourselves

0:23:35.200 --> 0:23:37.160
<v Speaker 1>with where we were in January, and I think people

0:23:37.160 --> 0:23:42.320
<v Speaker 1>can acknowledge that it seemed as though nothing had changed

0:23:42.359 --> 0:23:46.240
<v Speaker 1>from twelve thirty one through one thirty one, and in

0:23:46.280 --> 0:23:49.240
<v Speaker 1>the month we had outstanding returns in stocks and bonds.

0:23:49.280 --> 0:23:53.040
<v Speaker 1>So our clients were scratching their heads, just like we were, saying,

0:23:53.520 --> 0:23:56.840
<v Speaker 1>this doesn't feel right, and we're probably a little bit

0:23:56.840 --> 0:24:00.159
<v Speaker 1>ahead of ourselves. The good news is, like you said

0:24:00.200 --> 0:24:02.040
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty two, it's really hard to make money

0:24:02.040 --> 0:24:04.760
<v Speaker 1>in stocks and bonds. But when you moved outside of

0:24:04.800 --> 0:24:07.919
<v Speaker 1>traditional markets, there was a lot of opportunity and frankly,

0:24:07.960 --> 0:24:11.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of money to be made. So where and

0:24:12.040 --> 0:24:15.479
<v Speaker 1>is that still a good trade? Yeah? The alternative space

0:24:15.680 --> 0:24:18.480
<v Speaker 1>is still a trade. And when we say alternatives, we

0:24:18.520 --> 0:24:22.080
<v Speaker 1>think about real estate, we think about private equity, private lending.

0:24:22.440 --> 0:24:26.919
<v Speaker 1>Even hedge funds made money last year. So even hedge

0:24:26.920 --> 0:24:30.000
<v Speaker 1>funds made money. I love it. Even Head even those

0:24:30.040 --> 0:24:32.320
<v Speaker 1>guys made money. Remember when they were the masters of

0:24:32.359 --> 0:24:35.720
<v Speaker 1>the universe. Yea, listen, it's weird. I'm in Los Angeles.

0:24:35.720 --> 0:24:37.960
<v Speaker 1>I got a blizzard warning this morning, so the world

0:24:38.080 --> 0:24:41.000
<v Speaker 1>is not normal. We just have to acknowledge that. But look,

0:24:41.359 --> 0:24:44.920
<v Speaker 1>you could make if you were able to take some

0:24:45.000 --> 0:24:48.120
<v Speaker 1>illiquidity on, you could make a lot more money than

0:24:48.520 --> 0:24:51.800
<v Speaker 1>was available in the public markets. And that continues today.

0:24:52.160 --> 0:24:54.560
<v Speaker 1>When I see markets read today, what that says is

0:24:55.080 --> 0:24:58.119
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of anxiety out there. There's uncertainty, and

0:24:58.200 --> 0:25:00.879
<v Speaker 1>when people want their money every single moment of the

0:25:01.000 --> 0:25:03.240
<v Speaker 1>day and you're willing to say, you know what, I

0:25:03.280 --> 0:25:05.960
<v Speaker 1>don't need it tomorrow or next week or even next month. Yeah,

0:25:06.000 --> 0:25:09.120
<v Speaker 1>there's an interesting trade there. So where do we go here.

0:25:09.119 --> 0:25:12.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, the sixty forty portfolio did not

0:25:12.640 --> 0:25:15.760
<v Speaker 1>work last year. So you talk your clients, are you

0:25:16.040 --> 0:25:19.120
<v Speaker 1>are you heavier in risk assets? Here are you saying,

0:25:19.160 --> 0:25:20.800
<v Speaker 1>hey boy, we can actually make some money in the

0:25:20.880 --> 0:25:23.399
<v Speaker 1>fist income space. You can park your money into your

0:25:23.400 --> 0:25:27.280
<v Speaker 1>paper and get four point eight percent. Where are you

0:25:27.359 --> 0:25:30.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of pushing people these days? Are leading them? Well,

0:25:30.800 --> 0:25:33.199
<v Speaker 1>it comes back to this idea of alternative investments, of

0:25:33.280 --> 0:25:37.560
<v Speaker 1>having things outside of traditional stocks and bonds. So again,

0:25:37.640 --> 0:25:41.760
<v Speaker 1>private equity, private debt a big part of our solution

0:25:42.000 --> 0:25:45.120
<v Speaker 1>and it's worked. But if somebody says, look, I am

0:25:45.200 --> 0:25:48.199
<v Speaker 1>looking for that traditional portfolio. I need access to my

0:25:48.680 --> 0:25:53.040
<v Speaker 1>to liquidity for spending, there's an interesting opportunity that exists

0:25:53.040 --> 0:25:56.920
<v Speaker 1>today in municipal bonds for sure. You know you talked

0:25:56.920 --> 0:25:59.960
<v Speaker 1>about treasuries generating more yield. I would look because most

0:26:00.040 --> 0:26:02.800
<v Speaker 1>to our clients are at the highest marginal bracket. They

0:26:02.880 --> 0:26:05.520
<v Speaker 1>want that tax free income, and in exists today immunis.

0:26:06.359 --> 0:26:09.399
<v Speaker 1>We saw a nice move in January, giving them some

0:26:09.560 --> 0:26:12.680
<v Speaker 1>back this month. But again that's normal. And if all

0:26:12.720 --> 0:26:15.360
<v Speaker 1>you're concerned about is cash flow in the yield, it's

0:26:15.440 --> 0:26:20.520
<v Speaker 1>juicy today. So Alex in terms of the alternatives, again,

0:26:22.119 --> 0:26:24.360
<v Speaker 1>how out there on the risk premium do you get.

0:26:24.400 --> 0:26:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Are you out there buying timber for your clients or

0:26:28.240 --> 0:26:32.840
<v Speaker 1>is it more private equity hedge fund type stuff. You

0:26:32.840 --> 0:26:34.879
<v Speaker 1>could do both. I mean, I think right down the

0:26:34.920 --> 0:26:38.760
<v Speaker 1>middle of the fairway core type of cash flow centric

0:26:38.840 --> 0:26:43.320
<v Speaker 1>real estate is interesting. We're about to see a significant

0:26:43.320 --> 0:26:45.680
<v Speaker 1>shake up in the commercial real estate market given what's

0:26:45.680 --> 0:26:47.880
<v Speaker 1>gone on in rates and just having some dry powder

0:26:48.280 --> 0:26:49.960
<v Speaker 1>there to take advantage of it. I don't think you

0:26:50.000 --> 0:26:53.000
<v Speaker 1>need to do anything exotic or special to win there.

0:26:53.480 --> 0:26:56.040
<v Speaker 1>I think in private equity it's really you know, we've

0:26:56.080 --> 0:26:59.239
<v Speaker 1>done a good job of staying out of venture just

0:26:59.280 --> 0:27:01.320
<v Speaker 1>because we felt like it was frothy the last couple

0:27:01.359 --> 0:27:05.240
<v Speaker 1>of years. Now it's interesting prices have started to correct there,

0:27:06.040 --> 0:27:07.960
<v Speaker 1>and so I think, you look, you don't need to

0:27:08.119 --> 0:27:11.240
<v Speaker 1>overreach to win in the private markets today. There's a

0:27:11.240 --> 0:27:15.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of opportunity in terms of what you expect from

0:27:15.880 --> 0:27:18.240
<v Speaker 1>on the inflation front, what you expect from the Fed.

0:27:19.040 --> 0:27:23.400
<v Speaker 1>We got it hotter than expected PCE core deflator this

0:27:23.480 --> 0:27:26.439
<v Speaker 1>morning year over year four point seven percent. We were

0:27:26.480 --> 0:27:29.520
<v Speaker 1>looking for four point three percent, and that's up from

0:27:29.520 --> 0:27:33.120
<v Speaker 1>the four point six percent we had last month. That's

0:27:33.119 --> 0:27:35.720
<v Speaker 1>even up from the revised up from the four point

0:27:35.800 --> 0:27:38.720
<v Speaker 1>four percent. Anyway, it just looks like inflation is not

0:27:38.840 --> 0:27:41.879
<v Speaker 1>cooling down at the rate that this market expected. What

0:27:41.960 --> 0:27:44.560
<v Speaker 1>does that mean the Fed has to do well. I

0:27:44.640 --> 0:27:47.280
<v Speaker 1>think everyone's been saying this morning, it's higher for longer.

0:27:47.320 --> 0:27:51.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that's a surprise. Really. What's interesting is

0:27:51.280 --> 0:27:54.919
<v Speaker 1>the narrative change from hard landing versus soft landing to

0:27:55.040 --> 0:27:58.800
<v Speaker 1>now potentially no landing. I think, on the positive side,

0:27:58.800 --> 0:28:02.160
<v Speaker 1>this is an economy that's moving. You know, you can't

0:28:02.160 --> 0:28:05.280
<v Speaker 1>get a restaurant reservation, you can't get a hotel reservation,

0:28:05.880 --> 0:28:08.760
<v Speaker 1>you can't get a concert ticket. You know, you can't

0:28:08.760 --> 0:28:11.800
<v Speaker 1>get an ev there's a there's still is a massive

0:28:11.840 --> 0:28:15.720
<v Speaker 1>amount of demand. You can't get a Dodge Challenger, Hellcat,

0:28:16.040 --> 0:28:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Red Eye, right, go old school, that's right, each wealth.

0:28:20.920 --> 0:28:24.480
<v Speaker 1>But look that the point is people are spending, and

0:28:24.640 --> 0:28:27.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, we can sit around in a restaurant waiting

0:28:27.080 --> 0:28:28.840
<v Speaker 1>for a table and say, wow, this is a real

0:28:28.920 --> 0:28:31.639
<v Speaker 1>recession here. I can't get a table for you know,

0:28:31.760 --> 0:28:33.520
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna take me seven weeks, and I can get

0:28:33.560 --> 0:28:35.840
<v Speaker 1>a table at nine thirty on a Monday night. I mean,

0:28:35.840 --> 0:28:38.520
<v Speaker 1>people are really spending. So I don't think it's reasonable

0:28:38.560 --> 0:28:41.640
<v Speaker 1>for any of us to expect that inflation levels are

0:28:41.640 --> 0:28:44.160
<v Speaker 1>going to come down in the near future, but they're

0:28:44.160 --> 0:28:48.160
<v Speaker 1>going to trend lower over time. And look, the real question.

0:28:48.200 --> 0:28:51.480
<v Speaker 1>I know people within bursting or asking this, And a

0:28:51.520 --> 0:28:55.959
<v Speaker 1>colleague was on the counterpart on television this morning, just

0:28:56.040 --> 0:28:59.320
<v Speaker 1>talking about this idea that while it doesn't look like

0:28:59.320 --> 0:29:01.600
<v Speaker 1>it's going to bend today, it will bend in the future.

0:29:02.120 --> 0:29:04.640
<v Speaker 1>And so it's maybe it's not the first half of

0:29:04.680 --> 0:29:06.480
<v Speaker 1>the year, and maybe it's Q three and Q four

0:29:06.560 --> 0:29:09.000
<v Speaker 1>frankly where we start to see some relief. But as

0:29:09.000 --> 0:29:12.160
<v Speaker 1>long as the economy is steaming as it is, then

0:29:12.320 --> 0:29:15.360
<v Speaker 1>we can get through here again with a no landing scenario.

0:29:15.440 --> 0:29:18.160
<v Speaker 1>It's a it's a new idea. So do we do

0:29:18.240 --> 0:29:22.120
<v Speaker 1>the economics team at Bernstein, have they taken the recession

0:29:22.200 --> 0:29:25.600
<v Speaker 1>risk kind of off the table? No? No, no, Actually

0:29:26.200 --> 0:29:29.120
<v Speaker 1>they're in our base case, which is fifty percent of

0:29:29.200 --> 0:29:32.400
<v Speaker 1>the outcomes that we see in our forecast, we've got

0:29:32.480 --> 0:29:37.040
<v Speaker 1>a mild recession, and then our bear case, another twenty

0:29:37.040 --> 0:29:40.440
<v Speaker 1>five percent likelihood is more moderate recession. So I'd actually

0:29:40.480 --> 0:29:43.920
<v Speaker 1>say this is new. This is new. Our our forecast

0:29:43.960 --> 0:29:47.800
<v Speaker 1>still calls base case that will be in a mild recession.

0:29:47.840 --> 0:29:50.200
<v Speaker 1>But it'll be one of those recessions where you really

0:29:50.240 --> 0:29:51.920
<v Speaker 1>don't know if you're in or if you're out, And

0:29:51.920 --> 0:29:53.680
<v Speaker 1>then a year later they'll come back and say, oh,

0:29:53.760 --> 0:29:57.880
<v Speaker 1>remember Q four twenty two and Q one twenty three. Yeah, guys,

0:29:57.880 --> 0:30:00.600
<v Speaker 1>we actually were in recession. So it's it's not going

0:30:00.640 --> 0:30:03.560
<v Speaker 1>to feel like a normal recession. It's gonna be one

0:30:03.560 --> 0:30:05.360
<v Speaker 1>of the weirdest recessions will be in. But no, the

0:30:05.400 --> 0:30:07.760
<v Speaker 1>base case is still a mild recession. Alex got a

0:30:07.840 --> 0:30:11.560
<v Speaker 1>question from a listener writing in, and I hope you're

0:30:11.600 --> 0:30:14.680
<v Speaker 1>not friends with anybody on the f OMC because that

0:30:14.760 --> 0:30:18.440
<v Speaker 1>could taint your answer. So do you feel like the

0:30:18.480 --> 0:30:21.360
<v Speaker 1>FED has the guts to surprise the market with an

0:30:21.360 --> 0:30:25.520
<v Speaker 1>intermeding hike or MBS sales or will the market front

0:30:25.600 --> 0:30:30.960
<v Speaker 1>run the FED in perpetuity? Wow, I think all of

0:30:31.040 --> 0:30:35.920
<v Speaker 1>us have learned a lesson around FED guessing we're all

0:30:35.960 --> 0:30:40.440
<v Speaker 1>hoping that cherre Powell doesn't have the will to crush

0:30:40.520 --> 0:30:44.760
<v Speaker 1>the US economy and that they do break early. But

0:30:44.760 --> 0:30:47.240
<v Speaker 1>but the MBS side is interesting. But we've had the

0:30:47.320 --> 0:30:50.080
<v Speaker 1>reduction and balance sheet going on in the background. Two

0:30:50.160 --> 0:30:52.160
<v Speaker 1>years ago, that was a huge deal. Everyone was saying,

0:30:52.160 --> 0:30:53.480
<v Speaker 1>when is it going to happen, How is it going

0:30:53.560 --> 0:30:57.400
<v Speaker 1>to happen? And quietly it has been happening, and that's

0:30:57.400 --> 0:31:00.360
<v Speaker 1>something that's been lost. But if I were to answer

0:31:00.440 --> 0:31:02.200
<v Speaker 1>the question directly, because that's what we try to do

0:31:02.280 --> 0:31:06.240
<v Speaker 1>answer questions, I would say, I think the FED is

0:31:06.440 --> 0:31:11.000
<v Speaker 1>We think the FED is likely to pause before inflation

0:31:11.040 --> 0:31:13.400
<v Speaker 1>certainly gets to that two percent long run number. Alex,

0:31:13.400 --> 0:31:16.760
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned you're in Los Angeles. There weather issues aside,

0:31:16.760 --> 0:31:18.760
<v Speaker 1>and I did see some video of some snow by

0:31:18.760 --> 0:31:21.520
<v Speaker 1>the Hollywood sign, which I've never seen before. What's the

0:31:21.560 --> 0:31:24.640
<v Speaker 1>feeling in the LA market are in terms of the economy,

0:31:24.720 --> 0:31:26.920
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the outlook that that type of thing.

0:31:28.560 --> 0:31:31.840
<v Speaker 1>It is much like the rest of the country. It's

0:31:32.000 --> 0:31:36.600
<v Speaker 1>it's the economy is working. The parking garage and the

0:31:36.600 --> 0:31:40.120
<v Speaker 1>office buildings are full. People are coming back to the office.

0:31:40.240 --> 0:31:43.360
<v Speaker 1>There are not as many cranes as there are in Miami,

0:31:43.400 --> 0:31:46.600
<v Speaker 1>but there's a lot of construction activity. New home sales

0:31:46.720 --> 0:31:49.600
<v Speaker 1>continue to be tight. There's not a lot of inventory.

0:31:49.800 --> 0:31:52.360
<v Speaker 1>Some of it's related to California in the PROP thirteen.

0:31:52.920 --> 0:31:57.160
<v Speaker 1>But frankly, you know, there's so much home equity today

0:31:57.280 --> 0:32:01.560
<v Speaker 1>that didn't exist in prior periods pre recession in the past,

0:32:02.160 --> 0:32:04.680
<v Speaker 1>that the housing market is quite strong again on that

0:32:04.760 --> 0:32:09.000
<v Speaker 1>lack of inventory. So, you know, California, there's been lots

0:32:09.000 --> 0:32:11.440
<v Speaker 1>and lots of calls for it to be over, the

0:32:11.520 --> 0:32:14.040
<v Speaker 1>story to be over, the people leaving because of taxes,

0:32:15.160 --> 0:32:17.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, again back to restaurant reservations. I wish people

0:32:17.440 --> 0:32:22.240
<v Speaker 1>would leave. It's moving, all right. Alex kuran On, get

0:32:22.240 --> 0:32:26.240
<v Speaker 1>out of here, Get out of Austin, Texas. Alex Chalaf, Co,

0:32:26.440 --> 0:32:33.800
<v Speaker 1>head of Investment Strategies at Bernstein Private Wealth Management. We

0:32:33.920 --> 0:32:38.560
<v Speaker 1>have a killer panel in here in the Bloomberg Interactive

0:32:38.560 --> 0:32:43.120
<v Speaker 1>Broker studio. Listeners may know that I have with Katie

0:32:43.160 --> 0:32:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Greifeld and Eric Palcunas an ETF program. Wait, what day

0:32:47.160 --> 0:32:49.080
<v Speaker 1>do we do that? We do that on Mondays, sometimes

0:32:49.080 --> 0:32:53.160
<v Speaker 1>on Wednesdays. That's right, Mondays and Wednesdays, sometimes even Thursdays.

0:32:53.200 --> 0:32:55.120
<v Speaker 1>I think it's happened in the past. But anyway, one

0:32:55.160 --> 0:32:58.080
<v Speaker 1>PM in the afternoon and one of my favorite guests

0:32:58.080 --> 0:33:01.240
<v Speaker 1>just joined me and Katie in the studio, Joanna Glegis

0:33:01.320 --> 0:33:03.760
<v Speaker 1>joins Us. She's a co founder of bond Blocks, one

0:33:03.800 --> 0:33:09.600
<v Speaker 1>of I think the really innovative ETF providers that I

0:33:09.640 --> 0:33:12.880
<v Speaker 1>guess appeared out of the blue last year. Not out

0:33:12.880 --> 0:33:15.480
<v Speaker 1>of the blue, right, Joanna, because you've had experienced a

0:33:15.680 --> 0:33:17.640
<v Speaker 1>couple of the biggest ECF firms in the world. But

0:33:18.440 --> 0:33:20.800
<v Speaker 1>all right, so let's talk first of all about what

0:33:20.840 --> 0:33:24.720
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing in the flows and you focus your products.

0:33:24.760 --> 0:33:27.400
<v Speaker 1>You have nineteen ETFs focused really on the fixed income

0:33:27.480 --> 0:33:29.920
<v Speaker 1>world and nobody else does that, and then you cut

0:33:30.000 --> 0:33:32.520
<v Speaker 1>them into different slices so you can see what's happening

0:33:32.520 --> 0:33:35.920
<v Speaker 1>in high yield, what's happening and ig What are you

0:33:35.960 --> 0:33:38.720
<v Speaker 1>seeing right now? Yeah, so I think, as you would imagine,

0:33:38.720 --> 0:33:41.200
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing a lot of flow and interest on the

0:33:41.280 --> 0:33:45.240
<v Speaker 1>shorter end of the curve, especially in treasuries, so that

0:33:45.280 --> 0:33:50.040
<v Speaker 1>and also in short credit funds are taking on flow

0:33:50.680 --> 0:33:52.120
<v Speaker 1>just in the last few weeks. But it's kind of

0:33:52.160 --> 0:33:54.360
<v Speaker 1>depends on what week you're talking about, because in the

0:33:54.400 --> 0:33:58.560
<v Speaker 1>beginning of the year, maybe if you looked back ninety days,

0:33:58.600 --> 0:34:01.960
<v Speaker 1>you saw a big risk SCNE trade in high yield,

0:34:02.040 --> 0:34:04.200
<v Speaker 1>and so some of that we saw some coming off

0:34:04.280 --> 0:34:06.360
<v Speaker 1>last week. I think the markets are just trying to

0:34:06.400 --> 0:34:08.239
<v Speaker 1>absorb and ETFs are always are great poor to call

0:34:08.320 --> 0:34:10.359
<v Speaker 1>to see where people are moving around in their risk.

0:34:10.719 --> 0:34:12.839
<v Speaker 1>But we see, you know, mostly you're seeing things coming

0:34:12.880 --> 0:34:15.160
<v Speaker 1>in on the shorter end and on the you know,

0:34:15.560 --> 0:34:18.600
<v Speaker 1>less risky side. What's going to happen next week? Do

0:34:18.640 --> 0:34:20.359
<v Speaker 1>you think if it is a week by week. I mean,

0:34:20.360 --> 0:34:22.520
<v Speaker 1>it feels like just in the last few hours we

0:34:22.600 --> 0:34:26.879
<v Speaker 1>had so many hawkish data points, hawkish noises coming from

0:34:26.880 --> 0:34:29.759
<v Speaker 1>FED members, etc. Yeah, I mean, I will pull out

0:34:29.760 --> 0:34:31.799
<v Speaker 1>my crystal ball and tell you right now exactly what's

0:34:31.800 --> 0:34:34.560
<v Speaker 1>going to happen next week. But we tend to focus

0:34:34.640 --> 0:34:37.200
<v Speaker 1>on structurally what's going on in fixed income. And that's

0:34:37.239 --> 0:34:39.919
<v Speaker 1>why bomb Blocks was launched, is because we felt like

0:34:40.320 --> 0:34:43.480
<v Speaker 1>these markets, these modern markets are going to be so

0:34:43.600 --> 0:34:45.640
<v Speaker 1>different from the last ten years, in the last couple

0:34:45.680 --> 0:34:49.080
<v Speaker 1>decades and going forward. When we think about next week,

0:34:49.120 --> 0:34:52.040
<v Speaker 1>this week, the beginning of January, we're just thinking about

0:34:52.080 --> 0:34:55.520
<v Speaker 1>exposures for clients, and so it's it's not something we

0:34:55.560 --> 0:34:57.640
<v Speaker 1>try to make a call on. We try to give people,

0:34:57.960 --> 0:35:02.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, exposures into credit and exposures onto onto treasuries

0:35:02.360 --> 0:35:06.879
<v Speaker 1>for them to play duration credit risk. And I don't

0:35:06.920 --> 0:35:10.080
<v Speaker 1>think that. In talking to clients, you know, everybody's looking

0:35:10.080 --> 0:35:11.560
<v Speaker 1>to make a call for the bottom or a call

0:35:11.640 --> 0:35:13.120
<v Speaker 1>for this week or next week. It's just been too

0:35:13.120 --> 0:35:16.520
<v Speaker 1>hard to predictives and too volatile for people to It

0:35:16.560 --> 0:35:18.120
<v Speaker 1>really has been at the short end. I look at

0:35:18.200 --> 0:35:20.560
<v Speaker 1>X one has the X one and x HL I

0:35:20.719 --> 0:35:24.239
<v Speaker 1>have the biggest flows right, which is YEP year to date,

0:35:25.239 --> 0:35:28.040
<v Speaker 1>which is what one year duration is six month duration YEP,

0:35:28.320 --> 0:35:31.080
<v Speaker 1>so one year duration and six months duration. They're precise

0:35:31.320 --> 0:35:34.360
<v Speaker 1>duration tools, and I think that that's been really resonating

0:35:34.360 --> 0:35:37.640
<v Speaker 1>with clients in this market. And since it looks like

0:35:37.680 --> 0:35:40.239
<v Speaker 1>the FED and we just were looking at some data

0:35:40.280 --> 0:35:42.440
<v Speaker 1>that like the market is now pricing in more rate

0:35:42.520 --> 0:35:45.319
<v Speaker 1>hikes than the FED is until we hear more from them.

0:35:45.680 --> 0:35:48.920
<v Speaker 1>But like going forward, clients have looked at the shorter

0:35:49.040 --> 0:35:51.400
<v Speaker 1>end but also wanting to manage and control their duration

0:35:51.440 --> 0:35:55.680
<v Speaker 1>exposures very precisely. Duration has been your highest inflow products really,

0:35:55.719 --> 0:35:59.879
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's way above and beyond triple C or

0:36:00.320 --> 0:36:03.080
<v Speaker 1>high yield. If I look at the top five in

0:36:03.200 --> 0:36:06.160
<v Speaker 1>terms of your to date flows, it's one, six months,

0:36:06.520 --> 0:36:10.080
<v Speaker 1>two years, five years, seven years. So investors are really

0:36:10.200 --> 0:36:12.560
<v Speaker 1>using the duration products are really using in duration products,

0:36:12.600 --> 0:36:14.279
<v Speaker 1>and they're going on different points of the curve, which

0:36:14.320 --> 0:36:16.400
<v Speaker 1>we find really interesting, and they're able to reflect their

0:36:16.480 --> 0:36:19.160
<v Speaker 1>views across the products set. But you know, it's just

0:36:19.200 --> 0:36:22.320
<v Speaker 1>this simple notion that, like it is not twenty twenty

0:36:22.320 --> 0:36:24.800
<v Speaker 1>two interest rates moved four hundred and twenty five basis

0:36:24.800 --> 0:36:27.399
<v Speaker 1>points last year. The curve has moved. There's so much

0:36:27.440 --> 0:36:30.480
<v Speaker 1>you can do, at least in the treasury market right now,

0:36:30.520 --> 0:36:32.560
<v Speaker 1>and people are taking advantage of it. We launched these

0:36:32.560 --> 0:36:36.280
<v Speaker 1>in September and they immediately start to resonate with clients.

0:36:36.360 --> 0:36:40.560
<v Speaker 1>So obviously the duration products really a hit. You have

0:36:40.719 --> 0:36:43.400
<v Speaker 1>nineteen funds and it's really interesting. It covers a broad

0:36:43.520 --> 0:36:45.960
<v Speaker 1>swath of fixed income markets. It's not just treasuries. You

0:36:46.000 --> 0:36:48.359
<v Speaker 1>have an emerging markets fund which has done really well.

0:36:48.400 --> 0:36:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Then you have the rating specific and the sector specific

0:36:51.640 --> 0:36:54.640
<v Speaker 1>funds over the past year. Because you've been in business

0:36:54.640 --> 0:36:56.959
<v Speaker 1>for about a year now, are there any funds any

0:36:56.960 --> 0:36:59.919
<v Speaker 1>areas that have struggled in ways you didn't expect why?

0:37:00.000 --> 0:37:02.800
<v Speaker 1>I think all the volatilility last year and the correlation

0:37:02.840 --> 0:37:05.120
<v Speaker 1>between equities and fixed income was just really hard for

0:37:05.120 --> 0:37:07.799
<v Speaker 1>everyone to absorb the first half of the year, you know,

0:37:08.080 --> 0:37:10.160
<v Speaker 1>we saw a lot of de risking, and then towards

0:37:10.200 --> 0:37:12.560
<v Speaker 1>the fourth quarter, we saw people and our clients talking

0:37:12.560 --> 0:37:16.480
<v Speaker 1>about getting back into credit, and so, you know, everywhere

0:37:16.600 --> 0:37:20.440
<v Speaker 1>was hard last year. What's so interesting this year is

0:37:20.480 --> 0:37:23.480
<v Speaker 1>that one thing we heard consistently last year is I'm

0:37:23.480 --> 0:37:26.520
<v Speaker 1>waiting for a certain spread in credit to happen before

0:37:26.560 --> 0:37:29.840
<v Speaker 1>I come back in and it didn't materialize at you know,

0:37:30.000 --> 0:37:33.319
<v Speaker 1>levels of distress that people were expecting. So you know,

0:37:33.440 --> 0:37:36.840
<v Speaker 1>think about like GFC and other times in the pandemic.

0:37:37.080 --> 0:37:39.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, you're you're going to upwards of a thousand

0:37:39.239 --> 0:37:43.000
<v Speaker 1>basis points if spread in high yield or other areas

0:37:43.000 --> 0:37:45.760
<v Speaker 1>in credit, and that didn't materialize. We're still like hovering

0:37:45.840 --> 0:37:49.080
<v Speaker 1>around five five hundred basis points. And so we found

0:37:49.120 --> 0:37:51.759
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting that clients have sort of had to realize

0:37:51.800 --> 0:37:54.320
<v Speaker 1>that calling the bottom here or waiting for that distress,

0:37:54.400 --> 0:37:56.880
<v Speaker 1>that that's starting to lessen and alleviate in their in

0:37:56.920 --> 0:37:59.600
<v Speaker 1>their opinion. So for twenty twenty three, I mean, granted

0:37:59.600 --> 0:38:02.200
<v Speaker 1>the last few weeks had sort of extended the concern,

0:38:02.960 --> 0:38:05.000
<v Speaker 1>we're sort of we have more information that maybe the

0:38:05.120 --> 0:38:08.200
<v Speaker 1>deeper session and the fundamentals of companies are stronger than

0:38:08.200 --> 0:38:10.399
<v Speaker 1>we think and there's a lot of resilience. So that's

0:38:10.440 --> 0:38:12.479
<v Speaker 1>one thing we think didn't go the way we thought

0:38:12.480 --> 0:38:14.680
<v Speaker 1>it would last year, where clients were looking for a

0:38:14.760 --> 0:38:18.840
<v Speaker 1>much deeper distress levels than appeared. Paul, she has a

0:38:18.920 --> 0:38:21.319
<v Speaker 1>crystal ball out. You can ask her anything you want.

0:38:21.440 --> 0:38:24.040
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask her, is are you seeing flows

0:38:24.080 --> 0:38:27.600
<v Speaker 1>into high yield? Because the reason I ask is, you

0:38:27.640 --> 0:38:30.759
<v Speaker 1>know the recession call. It seems to be still out there,

0:38:30.760 --> 0:38:32.759
<v Speaker 1>but maybe not as strong as it was a few

0:38:32.920 --> 0:38:36.040
<v Speaker 1>months ago. Maybe it all depends on what the Fed does, right,

0:38:36.040 --> 0:38:38.479
<v Speaker 1>because even if we like we just talked to Alex

0:38:38.480 --> 0:38:40.399
<v Speaker 1>shall Off and he says, you know what, you can't

0:38:40.440 --> 0:38:43.400
<v Speaker 1>get a dinner reservation until seven weeks out, nine thirty

0:38:43.400 --> 0:38:45.920
<v Speaker 1>on a Monday. There's no way you're getting an EV

0:38:46.200 --> 0:38:48.440
<v Speaker 1>without paying a premium. And I can't even get my

0:38:48.480 --> 0:38:53.319
<v Speaker 1>Dodge Challenger. So this economy is hot, but that just

0:38:53.360 --> 0:38:57.200
<v Speaker 1>means the Fed has to keep raising rates and hold

0:38:57.239 --> 0:38:59.600
<v Speaker 1>higher for longer. So would you be calling for the

0:38:59.640 --> 0:39:02.840
<v Speaker 1>eventual recession. I've just been listening to it for the

0:39:02.840 --> 0:39:05.560
<v Speaker 1>most part, Pala says. But the eventual recession could hit harder,

0:39:05.600 --> 0:39:07.480
<v Speaker 1>could hit harder. So I mean, does that mean you're

0:39:07.480 --> 0:39:09.399
<v Speaker 1>not seeing people wanting to get into these high yield

0:39:09.440 --> 0:39:12.320
<v Speaker 1>funds that you have. Yeah, so I think that there's

0:39:12.360 --> 0:39:14.919
<v Speaker 1>there are certain trades where we're seeing risks come back

0:39:14.920 --> 0:39:17.440
<v Speaker 1>into portfolios. I think what we will see is that

0:39:17.480 --> 0:39:19.799
<v Speaker 1>people will build their high yield portfolios and their cutit

0:39:19.800 --> 0:39:22.000
<v Speaker 1>portfolios differently than they have in the past. Maybe they

0:39:22.000 --> 0:39:26.640
<v Speaker 1>don't go as broad they general high yeld index or

0:39:26.640 --> 0:39:28.960
<v Speaker 1>a high old ETF has ten eleven percent of triple

0:39:29.040 --> 0:39:31.560
<v Speaker 1>C maybe you want to be more precise there. But

0:39:31.600 --> 0:39:34.279
<v Speaker 1>we like to also focus on the industry sectors in

0:39:34.360 --> 0:39:36.800
<v Speaker 1>high old because they're very different. There's a thousand basis

0:39:36.840 --> 0:39:40.120
<v Speaker 1>points of difference in the highest performance sector last year

0:39:40.160 --> 0:39:42.640
<v Speaker 1>and the worst performance sector last year. That was energy

0:39:42.640 --> 0:39:46.040
<v Speaker 1>and healthcare. And today, you know, we think when we

0:39:46.040 --> 0:39:49.960
<v Speaker 1>can be really positive construction constructive on industries that have

0:39:50.239 --> 0:39:54.040
<v Speaker 1>cash flow now and are less focused on growth than

0:39:54.400 --> 0:39:58.040
<v Speaker 1>having cash flow now. So that's energy, industrials, financials, and

0:39:58.120 --> 0:40:01.680
<v Speaker 1>so we just you shouldn't look fixed income as a

0:40:01.719 --> 0:40:05.160
<v Speaker 1>big swath. You should be looking for opportunities introsectors of

0:40:06.040 --> 0:40:08.640
<v Speaker 1>fixed income, and then obviously in credit look into industry

0:40:08.680 --> 0:40:13.200
<v Speaker 1>sectors ratings. There's lots of opportunity and differentiation, good stuff.

0:40:13.200 --> 0:40:14.880
<v Speaker 1>We could talk ETFs. That's why you guys have a

0:40:14.880 --> 0:40:18.480
<v Speaker 1>show about etips because you could just go into this topic.

0:40:19.840 --> 0:40:23.520
<v Speaker 1>Well currently thirty minutes currently TVD. I'm looking at a

0:40:23.520 --> 0:40:25.720
<v Speaker 1>little bit of expansion. Are you looking at an expansion?

0:40:25.760 --> 0:40:28.759
<v Speaker 1>All right? Well, if you're looking for it, Johanna Gaylagos, Uh, Diegos,

0:40:28.800 --> 0:40:31.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, co founder Joins is it? How do your

0:40:31.920 --> 0:40:35.960
<v Speaker 1>parents say it? Diegos? Yeah, I'm going, oh, okay, that's good.

0:40:36.200 --> 0:40:39.040
<v Speaker 1>I like that Spanish. Yeah. Katie Greifeld, that's easy. I've

0:40:39.080 --> 0:40:41.040
<v Speaker 1>been down with that for a long time. No problems there,

0:40:41.480 --> 0:40:44.759
<v Speaker 1>joining us talking about ETF's great stuff. Bond blocks is

0:40:44.880 --> 0:40:51.600
<v Speaker 1>the company, join us a co founder there, we'll talk

0:40:51.680 --> 0:40:57.359
<v Speaker 1>tech talk, MNA have the regulators. They're coming down on

0:40:57.360 --> 0:40:58.960
<v Speaker 1>some of these big deals. It's tough to get some

0:40:59.040 --> 0:41:00.800
<v Speaker 1>of these deals done. So we want to bring in

0:41:00.880 --> 0:41:04.719
<v Speaker 1>gen Rye. She covers all anti trust stuff for Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:41:05.040 --> 0:41:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Is the expert here, and I want to talk about

0:41:07.719 --> 0:41:10.640
<v Speaker 1>some of these bigger deals. Adobe Figma that's a twenty

0:41:10.640 --> 0:41:13.799
<v Speaker 1>billion dollar deal. We've got Microsoft and Activision. So Jen

0:41:14.440 --> 0:41:17.680
<v Speaker 1>talk to us about how the regulators, the DJ the

0:41:17.800 --> 0:41:20.440
<v Speaker 1>Federal Trade Commission, how are they looking at big tech deals?

0:41:20.440 --> 0:41:22.439
<v Speaker 1>Can you get a deal done today? You know it's

0:41:22.440 --> 0:41:24.279
<v Speaker 1>going to be a really rough year, I think for

0:41:24.360 --> 0:41:27.399
<v Speaker 1>tech and other industries too, but right the focus is tech.

0:41:27.880 --> 0:41:30.160
<v Speaker 1>I think the regulators today are trying to make up

0:41:30.200 --> 0:41:32.680
<v Speaker 1>for lost time. I think they believe they allowed far

0:41:32.719 --> 0:41:35.160
<v Speaker 1>too many transactions in the last ten years or so

0:41:35.480 --> 0:41:37.680
<v Speaker 1>to clear through, either all the way through or with

0:41:37.760 --> 0:41:40.359
<v Speaker 1>some sort of a divestment to settle the case, and

0:41:40.440 --> 0:41:43.480
<v Speaker 1>that what's happened is we've created these giant companies with

0:41:43.600 --> 0:41:46.520
<v Speaker 1>just too much power and too much dominance today. So

0:41:46.960 --> 0:41:48.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, they're trying to make up for lost time.

0:41:48.640 --> 0:41:51.400
<v Speaker 1>They're looking at these deals really carefully. They're going to

0:41:51.480 --> 0:41:54.680
<v Speaker 1>be more interventionist, they're less likely to settle, and they're

0:41:54.719 --> 0:41:56.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot more likely to challenge deals even if they

0:41:57.000 --> 0:42:00.600
<v Speaker 1>have a hard roading chord. I mean, it seems like

0:42:01.080 --> 0:42:04.560
<v Speaker 1>they can regulators can stop deals, but I wonder if

0:42:04.600 --> 0:42:09.240
<v Speaker 1>they had the power that they once did. If I'm correct,

0:42:09.239 --> 0:42:12.120
<v Speaker 1>the last big breakup we saw was mob Bell and

0:42:12.600 --> 0:42:15.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean we were kids then, right, So eighty four

0:42:15.800 --> 0:42:19.960
<v Speaker 1>have they done anything like that since because they seem

0:42:20.040 --> 0:42:22.880
<v Speaker 1>to have designs on Google in that right, in that

0:42:22.920 --> 0:42:26.640
<v Speaker 1>sense absolutely so they almost did with Microsoft, that would

0:42:26.640 --> 0:42:28.520
<v Speaker 1>have been them next occasion, right, that was in the

0:42:28.600 --> 0:42:31.759
<v Speaker 1>nineteen nineties early two thousand. They actually did get a

0:42:31.800 --> 0:42:35.000
<v Speaker 1>lower court order for Microsoft to break itself apart, but

0:42:35.080 --> 0:42:38.799
<v Speaker 1>then the appellate court reversed some things, put question on

0:42:38.840 --> 0:42:42.000
<v Speaker 1>that remedy and it settled, ultimately settled, and that didn't happen.

0:42:42.040 --> 0:42:44.400
<v Speaker 1>So that was the last time they came close. I

0:42:44.440 --> 0:42:47.400
<v Speaker 1>think the DOJ right now is really gunning for Google.

0:42:47.760 --> 0:42:50.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, they have two lawsuits there maybe another there

0:42:50.680 --> 0:42:52.920
<v Speaker 1>actually could be two others that come from the DOJ,

0:42:53.280 --> 0:42:55.400
<v Speaker 1>and I think they're really gunning for some sort of

0:42:55.440 --> 0:42:58.279
<v Speaker 1>an order that businesses are broken off. It doesn't mean

0:42:58.320 --> 0:43:00.680
<v Speaker 1>they're going to win that, You're right, It's really hard

0:43:00.960 --> 0:43:03.720
<v Speaker 1>to win something like that in court. It's a drastic remedy,

0:43:03.760 --> 0:43:06.719
<v Speaker 1>and sometimes there are less drastic remedies that can fix

0:43:06.800 --> 0:43:09.239
<v Speaker 1>the problem. Was it very different back then? You I

0:43:09.239 --> 0:43:13.440
<v Speaker 1>mean knowing that we were, you know, all playing you know,

0:43:13.520 --> 0:43:18.120
<v Speaker 1>four square kickball time. Was it a different environment where

0:43:18.200 --> 0:43:22.080
<v Speaker 1>government had more power than giant corporations because it seems

0:43:22.120 --> 0:43:24.920
<v Speaker 1>like now the opposite is true. I think the treatment

0:43:24.960 --> 0:43:28.960
<v Speaker 1>of antitrust laws changed over the years. Right. Earlier in time,

0:43:29.080 --> 0:43:33.120
<v Speaker 1>antitrust was more interventionist. The way the judges would interpret

0:43:33.160 --> 0:43:36.000
<v Speaker 1>the law when cases were brought by private parties or

0:43:36.000 --> 0:43:39.719
<v Speaker 1>by the government was less business friendly. But then doctrine

0:43:39.719 --> 0:43:42.640
<v Speaker 1>developed over time by economists. It's sort of called the

0:43:42.719 --> 0:43:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Chicago school because a lot of the thought came from

0:43:44.960 --> 0:43:48.960
<v Speaker 1>the University of Chicago that we needed to look at

0:43:49.000 --> 0:43:52.600
<v Speaker 1>efficiencies a little bit differently, and that sometimes deals can

0:43:52.680 --> 0:43:56.040
<v Speaker 1>be pro competitive and efficient because of what they do

0:43:56.120 --> 0:43:58.960
<v Speaker 1>for those companies and products that could be brought to market,

0:43:59.040 --> 0:44:02.520
<v Speaker 1>more innovation, things like that, And judges started to adopt

0:44:02.560 --> 0:44:05.280
<v Speaker 1>that kind of philosophy and became much more business friendly.

0:44:05.520 --> 0:44:08.560
<v Speaker 1>So over time it became harder in court to try

0:44:08.600 --> 0:44:11.560
<v Speaker 1>to prove that there's actually anti competitive harm being caused

0:44:11.600 --> 0:44:14.000
<v Speaker 1>either by a company acting on its own or by

0:44:14.000 --> 0:44:16.360
<v Speaker 1>a merger. All right, So to excid that we have

0:44:16.400 --> 0:44:19.120
<v Speaker 1>a higher degree of antitrust scrutiny here is that a

0:44:19.280 --> 0:44:22.200
<v Speaker 1>function of the administration in the White House such that

0:44:22.280 --> 0:44:24.440
<v Speaker 1>in two years time, if we get a Republican administration,

0:44:25.360 --> 0:44:28.440
<v Speaker 1>it'll just go the other way again, absolutely, and we

0:44:28.480 --> 0:44:31.520
<v Speaker 1>absolutely have a push by this administration to do something

0:44:31.560 --> 0:44:34.319
<v Speaker 1>about the economy, and part of that something is to

0:44:34.320 --> 0:44:39.000
<v Speaker 1>bolster antitrust enforcement. It could change, absolutely, but I will

0:44:39.040 --> 0:44:41.400
<v Speaker 1>say this that there is a lot of bipartisan interest

0:44:41.520 --> 0:44:43.560
<v Speaker 1>in sort of curbing the power of some of the

0:44:43.600 --> 0:44:46.840
<v Speaker 1>dominant big tech platforms. So it's not necessarily a given

0:44:46.880 --> 0:44:49.399
<v Speaker 1>that if with the next administration as a Republican one

0:44:49.440 --> 0:44:52.879
<v Speaker 1>in the anti trust leadership flips to Republicans, that this

0:44:52.960 --> 0:44:55.680
<v Speaker 1>push won't continue, at least to some extent. How much

0:44:55.719 --> 0:44:57.759
<v Speaker 1>does I mean, I'm a cynic when it comes to

0:44:58.160 --> 0:45:01.600
<v Speaker 1>so I sort of have the view that these companies

0:45:01.920 --> 0:45:06.680
<v Speaker 1>fund all of the congressmen and senators campaigns, and as

0:45:06.680 --> 0:45:10.239
<v Speaker 1>a result, they have these politicians in their pockets. You know,

0:45:10.360 --> 0:45:12.319
<v Speaker 1>I think that there's quite a bit of truth to

0:45:12.440 --> 0:45:14.920
<v Speaker 1>that statement. I happen to be a cynic also, But

0:45:15.000 --> 0:45:16.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, there was a lot of momentum for some

0:45:16.719 --> 0:45:20.040
<v Speaker 1>new laws, antitrust laws that would have targeted and regulated

0:45:20.080 --> 0:45:22.440
<v Speaker 1>big tech platforms, and there was a lot of lobbying

0:45:22.480 --> 0:45:25.719
<v Speaker 1>money put in by some big companies against that, and

0:45:25.880 --> 0:45:28.279
<v Speaker 1>nothing happened. When a lot of people thought something would

0:45:28.280 --> 0:45:32.400
<v Speaker 1>happen last year. It's interesting that they're so. You know,

0:45:32.520 --> 0:45:34.600
<v Speaker 1>lately there's been a lot of talk about what are

0:45:34.600 --> 0:45:37.640
<v Speaker 1>these old Supreme Court justices know about tech? And I

0:45:37.680 --> 0:45:41.719
<v Speaker 1>think that's pretty fascinating. But it's interesting that they would

0:45:41.719 --> 0:45:46.200
<v Speaker 1>go after Microsoft for activision, Like, what are these old

0:45:46.320 --> 0:45:49.880
<v Speaker 1>judges or old regulators know about video games? Why do

0:45:49.920 --> 0:45:52.400
<v Speaker 1>they care about Call of Duty? I know it's a

0:45:52.440 --> 0:45:55.680
<v Speaker 1>big number, right, but who cares if somebody has all

0:45:55.719 --> 0:45:57.840
<v Speaker 1>the video games? It's funny you should say that. I

0:45:57.880 --> 0:45:59.520
<v Speaker 1>spoke on a panel about this, and none of the

0:45:59.560 --> 0:46:03.080
<v Speaker 1>panelists had ever played Call of Duty, so we thought,

0:46:03.120 --> 0:46:05.719
<v Speaker 1>maybe we're not the best. You know, isn't there a

0:46:05.719 --> 0:46:08.520
<v Speaker 1>great story by the way of a couple of justices

0:46:08.800 --> 0:46:14.919
<v Speaker 1>I think Briar was one and Elena Kayden playing Call

0:46:14.960 --> 0:46:17.680
<v Speaker 1>of Duty. They had someone set up the video game

0:46:17.760 --> 0:46:21.720
<v Speaker 1>and bring it down to their quarters. I think Briar

0:46:21.840 --> 0:46:24.719
<v Speaker 1>said it was disgusting and he couldn't believe anybody liked it,

0:46:24.760 --> 0:46:29.239
<v Speaker 1>and Kayden was like, I want to play more. Right. Well,

0:46:29.280 --> 0:46:31.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, the thing is that the agencies are really

0:46:31.440 --> 0:46:33.680
<v Speaker 1>focused on certain kinds of mergers right now, and one

0:46:33.680 --> 0:46:36.359
<v Speaker 1>of them is called vertical right, and Microsoft represents that

0:46:36.600 --> 0:46:39.319
<v Speaker 1>it's where the two companies don't necessarily compete, but they

0:46:39.360 --> 0:46:42.480
<v Speaker 1>have a relationship in this supply chain. Right, So Microsoft

0:46:42.560 --> 0:46:45.240
<v Speaker 1>has consoles, they're sort of a distributor, so to speak,

0:46:45.600 --> 0:46:48.839
<v Speaker 1>of these video games, and Activision makes the games, and

0:46:48.880 --> 0:46:50.840
<v Speaker 1>that is a vertical deal. So it's one of the

0:46:50.840 --> 0:46:53.160
<v Speaker 1>focuses of the agencies right now. And I think this

0:46:53.239 --> 0:46:55.279
<v Speaker 1>was a case where they thought this is a good

0:46:55.280 --> 0:46:57.640
<v Speaker 1>one for us to sort of exercise that kind of

0:46:57.719 --> 0:46:59.759
<v Speaker 1>theory of harm. Well, you know, one of the ones

0:46:59.800 --> 0:47:02.640
<v Speaker 1>that's you're dear to my heart that I couldn't believe

0:47:02.719 --> 0:47:06.360
<v Speaker 1>got approved is Live Nation and Ticketmaster. I mean, you

0:47:06.400 --> 0:47:09.360
<v Speaker 1>take the biggest concert promoter in the world, right and

0:47:09.400 --> 0:47:12.960
<v Speaker 1>you put it together the largest ticketing organization in the world.

0:47:13.520 --> 0:47:15.640
<v Speaker 1>And now, you know, people were saying, I even heard

0:47:15.680 --> 0:47:17.320
<v Speaker 1>President Biden talking about it. You know, I'm going to

0:47:18.000 --> 0:47:20.799
<v Speaker 1>do something to take care of those fees. Somebody has

0:47:20.840 --> 0:47:23.600
<v Speaker 1>to do something. Somebody. Let me tell you something a

0:47:23.600 --> 0:47:26.359
<v Speaker 1>little inside baseball, right Paul worked on that deal, and

0:47:26.560 --> 0:47:29.520
<v Speaker 1>he and the bankers that were on it said, just

0:47:29.600 --> 0:47:31.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, we were surprised that it got We were

0:47:31.719 --> 0:47:33.960
<v Speaker 1>surprised that it got approved. So well, you know, as

0:47:34.000 --> 0:47:36.239
<v Speaker 1>an X former anti trust lawyer, when we saw the

0:47:36.280 --> 0:47:39.040
<v Speaker 1>banker's documents sometimes it really caused us to shake our

0:47:39.080 --> 0:47:42.080
<v Speaker 1>head because the banker documents can cause a lot of trouble, yeah,

0:47:42.120 --> 0:47:44.239
<v Speaker 1>when you're trying to defend a deal. But that kind

0:47:44.239 --> 0:47:46.799
<v Speaker 1>of those are the issue. I mean, if you could

0:47:46.920 --> 0:47:50.320
<v Speaker 1>argue they should be broken up, right, but there's nobody

0:47:50.320 --> 0:47:52.760
<v Speaker 1>really thinks they're going to be broken up because again,

0:47:52.920 --> 0:47:55.080
<v Speaker 1>it's so hard. Now, this is a perfect example of

0:47:55.080 --> 0:47:57.120
<v Speaker 1>what I was talking about at the beginning of this segment.

0:47:57.239 --> 0:47:59.480
<v Speaker 1>This is part of the regret. You know, that is

0:47:59.520 --> 0:48:02.080
<v Speaker 1>one of the deals that likely the DJ today regrets

0:48:02.080 --> 0:48:04.560
<v Speaker 1>that it allowed to go through even with the consent agreement.

0:48:05.280 --> 0:48:07.839
<v Speaker 1>And I believe they're still investigating today and they very

0:48:07.840 --> 0:48:09.880
<v Speaker 1>well could bring a lawsuit to try to break it up.

0:48:09.920 --> 0:48:12.200
<v Speaker 1>But you know, they're facing a judge who knows what

0:48:12.280 --> 0:48:13.640
<v Speaker 1>judge that they're going to go in front. And it

0:48:13.760 --> 0:48:15.920
<v Speaker 1>is a difficult path to do something like that. It's

0:48:15.920 --> 0:48:20.200
<v Speaker 1>the DJ or the FTC the harder one to deal with. Interesting,

0:48:20.280 --> 0:48:22.799
<v Speaker 1>right now, I think they're really aligned. Okay, at one

0:48:22.800 --> 0:48:24.839
<v Speaker 1>point I would have said FTC, but I think now

0:48:24.880 --> 0:48:27.759
<v Speaker 1>they're really aligned. They're doing things the same way. They're

0:48:27.760 --> 0:48:31.319
<v Speaker 1>equally as aggressive. Right now, Okay, great stuff. Here's Matt.

0:48:31.400 --> 0:48:35.840
<v Speaker 1>Here's another great thing about Bloomberg Intelligence. We have world

0:48:35.920 --> 0:48:39.719
<v Speaker 1>class analys to cover litigation. And so when you got

0:48:39.760 --> 0:48:42.040
<v Speaker 1>a big deal and you're worried and you're you're invested

0:48:42.080 --> 0:48:44.600
<v Speaker 1>in Microsoft and you really want to know this deal

0:48:44.680 --> 0:48:46.920
<v Speaker 1>is going to go through, don't talk about financial analysts

0:48:46.960 --> 0:48:48.600
<v Speaker 1>like me want I know, you go to Jen Rie

0:48:48.760 --> 0:48:52.719
<v Speaker 1>and she's the expert. And Bloomberg Intelligence had the foresight

0:48:53.040 --> 0:48:55.120
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that we had these kinds of experts

0:48:55.640 --> 0:48:59.520
<v Speaker 1>available for our clients. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg

0:48:59.600 --> 0:49:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Markets podcast. You can subscribe and listen to interviews of

0:49:03.040 --> 0:49:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller.

0:49:08.120 --> 0:49:11.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at Matt Miller nineteen seventy three. And

0:49:11.680 --> 0:49:14.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm Fall Sweeney. I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before

0:49:14.320 --> 0:49:17.160
<v Speaker 1>the podcast, you can always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg

0:49:17.239 --> 0:49:17.759
<v Speaker 1>Radio