WEBVTT - Cause and Effect on a Global Scale

0:00:02.400 --> 0:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News.

0:00:08.920 --> 0:00:12.880
<v Speaker 2>This is Master's in Business with Barry rid Holds on

0:00:13.119 --> 0:00:15.160
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:16.680 --> 0:00:19.920
<v Speaker 1>This week on the podcast, I have a fascinating guest.

0:00:19.960 --> 0:00:22.920
<v Speaker 1>His name is Brian Klass. He teaches at the University

0:00:22.960 --> 0:00:26.239
<v Speaker 1>College London, where he focuses on global politics, and he

0:00:26.280 --> 0:00:29.240
<v Speaker 1>has written a book that I have just plowed through

0:00:29.320 --> 0:00:35.160
<v Speaker 1>the first half of and found absolutely fascinating, Fluke, Chance,

0:00:35.280 --> 0:00:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Chaos and Why Everything we do Matters. He just really

0:00:39.240 --> 0:00:44.559
<v Speaker 1>explains why our understanding of cause and effect is so

0:00:44.760 --> 0:00:47.400
<v Speaker 1>flawed that we think that A naturally leads to B,

0:00:47.560 --> 0:00:51.200
<v Speaker 1>which leads to C, and instead the world is far

0:00:51.280 --> 0:00:56.600
<v Speaker 1>more random and complex, and little things that happened years ago,

0:00:56.880 --> 0:01:01.160
<v Speaker 1>sometimes thousands or millions of years ago, have a giant

0:01:01.400 --> 0:01:04.800
<v Speaker 1>impact on what happens today. It really turns your view

0:01:04.840 --> 0:01:08.080
<v Speaker 1>on causation upside down and it makes you rethink just

0:01:08.240 --> 0:01:12.040
<v Speaker 1>how random everything is. I found the book fascinating and

0:01:12.080 --> 0:01:14.880
<v Speaker 1>I found our conversation fascinating, and I think you will

0:01:14.920 --> 0:01:18.440
<v Speaker 1>also with no further ado, my conversation with the author

0:01:18.480 --> 0:01:20.679
<v Speaker 1>of Luke, Brian Klass.

0:01:21.000 --> 0:01:22.360
<v Speaker 2>It's a pleasure to be here. Thanks for having me

0:01:22.400 --> 0:01:22.839
<v Speaker 2>on the show.

0:01:22.920 --> 0:01:27.320
<v Speaker 1>So this book is nothing more than just all confirmation

0:01:27.400 --> 0:01:29.959
<v Speaker 1>biased for me. We'll jump into this in a bit.

0:01:30.319 --> 0:01:34.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm about halfway through it and really really enjoying it.

0:01:34.680 --> 0:01:38.480
<v Speaker 1>But I have to start out with a story you

0:01:38.560 --> 0:01:41.880
<v Speaker 1>tell in the introduction to the book. You're twenty years old.

0:01:41.959 --> 0:01:45.680
<v Speaker 1>Your father pulls you aside, shows you a newspaper clipping

0:01:45.760 --> 0:01:50.680
<v Speaker 1>from nineteen o five and the headline is terrible act

0:01:50.800 --> 0:01:58.160
<v Speaker 1>of insane woman. Tell us about that woman, Clara Magdalene Jansen,

0:01:58.600 --> 0:01:59.440
<v Speaker 1>and what she did.

0:02:00.160 --> 0:02:03.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so this story is from a place called Keeler, Wisconsin,

0:02:03.240 --> 0:02:06.520
<v Speaker 2>a little rural farmhouse in nineteen oh five, and she's

0:02:06.560 --> 0:02:09.600
<v Speaker 2>got four young children, and she probably has what we

0:02:09.600 --> 0:02:12.280
<v Speaker 2>would determine as postpart and depression, but of course they

0:02:12.280 --> 0:02:13.560
<v Speaker 2>don't know what that is in nineteen oh five, and

0:02:13.560 --> 0:02:16.799
<v Speaker 2>she has a mental breakdown, and so she ends up

0:02:17.120 --> 0:02:19.840
<v Speaker 2>tragically killing all of her kids and then taking her

0:02:19.840 --> 0:02:23.120
<v Speaker 2>own life. And her husband comes home to the farmhouse

0:02:23.160 --> 0:02:26.520
<v Speaker 2>and finds his whole family dead, and you could just

0:02:26.560 --> 0:02:28.600
<v Speaker 2>imagine the horror of this. And the reason I put

0:02:28.600 --> 0:02:30.680
<v Speaker 2>this in the introduction to Fluke is because this is

0:02:30.720 --> 0:02:34.600
<v Speaker 2>my great grandfather's first wife, and so one of the

0:02:34.639 --> 0:02:36.400
<v Speaker 2>things that was really extraordinary for me was that I

0:02:36.440 --> 0:02:38.840
<v Speaker 2>went through my first twenty odd years of life not

0:02:38.880 --> 0:02:41.680
<v Speaker 2>knowing about this dark chapter in my family history. But

0:02:41.760 --> 0:02:43.880
<v Speaker 2>after I saw this newspaper headline, you know, sort of

0:02:43.880 --> 0:02:46.600
<v Speaker 2>get over the shock of knowing this about your own family.

0:02:47.240 --> 0:02:50.640
<v Speaker 2>But then you realize that you don't exist unless this

0:02:50.720 --> 0:02:52.880
<v Speaker 2>had happened to me, right, so you wouldn't be listening

0:02:52.880 --> 0:02:55.800
<v Speaker 2>to my voice unless these children had died.

0:02:56.080 --> 0:02:59.760
<v Speaker 1>So following that tragedy, your grandfather moves on with his

0:02:59.800 --> 0:03:03.560
<v Speaker 1>life exactly, eventually remarries the woman who becomes Greg, your

0:03:03.600 --> 0:03:07.960
<v Speaker 1>great grandmother. So but for this random horrible events, we're

0:03:08.000 --> 0:03:09.600
<v Speaker 1>not here having this conversation exactly.

0:03:09.639 --> 0:03:10.959
<v Speaker 2>And this is where, you know, this is why I

0:03:11.000 --> 0:03:13.720
<v Speaker 2>started getting interested in applying things like chaos theory to

0:03:14.160 --> 0:03:17.600
<v Speaker 2>human society and also to our own lives, because, of course,

0:03:17.680 --> 0:03:19.880
<v Speaker 2>you know, Clara, when she decided to do this horrible

0:03:20.000 --> 0:03:21.880
<v Speaker 2>thing to her children and also take her own life,

0:03:22.720 --> 0:03:24.239
<v Speaker 2>she had no way of knowing that one hundred and

0:03:24.320 --> 0:03:26.079
<v Speaker 2>nineteen years later, you know, you and I would be

0:03:26.120 --> 0:03:29.000
<v Speaker 2>talking on Bloomberg. But that's that's the way it is, right,

0:03:29.000 --> 0:03:30.600
<v Speaker 2>That's the way the world works. And so I think

0:03:30.639 --> 0:03:32.960
<v Speaker 2>this is the kind of stuff where we tend to

0:03:33.040 --> 0:03:35.600
<v Speaker 2>imagine that there's just sort of these you know, big

0:03:35.680 --> 0:03:38.560
<v Speaker 2>building blocks of life, like the really obvious variables that

0:03:38.600 --> 0:03:42.080
<v Speaker 2>create outcomes. And the argument I'm making is, actually, you know,

0:03:42.240 --> 0:03:45.160
<v Speaker 2>it's it's sort of heretical to the you know, look

0:03:45.200 --> 0:03:46.920
<v Speaker 2>for the signal, not the noise, because I am a

0:03:46.960 --> 0:03:48.000
<v Speaker 2>byproduct of the noise.

0:03:48.360 --> 0:03:52.040
<v Speaker 1>So so the rational cause and effect A leads to

0:03:52.080 --> 0:03:56.360
<v Speaker 1>be are. So that's one individual, and obviously one individual

0:03:56.400 --> 0:04:00.720
<v Speaker 1>can change a future set of bloodlines. Let's take this

0:04:00.800 --> 0:04:04.600
<v Speaker 1>a little bigger. Let's talk about mister and missus Stimpson

0:04:05.120 --> 0:04:08.680
<v Speaker 1>who go on vacation in Coyota, Japan in nineteen twenty six.

0:04:09.480 --> 0:04:13.880
<v Speaker 1>How significant can that vacation? Possibly big?

0:04:14.200 --> 0:04:16.839
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So this is a couple, mister and missus hl Stimpson.

0:04:16.880 --> 0:04:18.880
<v Speaker 2>They go to Kyoto, Japan on a holiday, on a

0:04:18.920 --> 0:04:21.279
<v Speaker 2>vacation in nineteen twenty six, and they just fall in

0:04:21.279 --> 0:04:23.160
<v Speaker 2>love with the city. It's an experience that a lot

0:04:23.160 --> 0:04:24.480
<v Speaker 2>of us have where you go on vacation, you get

0:04:24.480 --> 0:04:28.240
<v Speaker 2>a soft spot for wherever you've gone to relax and

0:04:28.240 --> 0:04:30.920
<v Speaker 2>so on, and they just find it utterly charming. Now,

0:04:31.400 --> 0:04:33.520
<v Speaker 2>nineteen years later, this turns out to matter quite a

0:04:33.520 --> 0:04:36.880
<v Speaker 2>lot because the husband and the couple. Henry Stimpson ends

0:04:36.920 --> 0:04:40.400
<v Speaker 2>up as America's Secretary of War and the Target Committee

0:04:40.480 --> 0:04:43.040
<v Speaker 2>approaches him with their recommendations of where to drop the

0:04:43.040 --> 0:04:45.440
<v Speaker 2>first atomic bomb in nineteen forty five, and top of

0:04:45.440 --> 0:04:47.560
<v Speaker 2>the list unequivocal Kyoto.

0:04:48.200 --> 0:04:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Now he's not Tokyo, which has already been demolished.

0:04:51.720 --> 0:04:55.240
<v Speaker 2>Tokyo's basically been destroyed. There's an argument here that Kyoto's

0:04:55.279 --> 0:04:59.760
<v Speaker 2>just opened up a warplane factory. It's a former imperial capital,

0:05:00.040 --> 0:05:02.320
<v Speaker 2>so it has sort of propaganda value for, you know,

0:05:02.440 --> 0:05:04.880
<v Speaker 2>reducing Japanese morales. So all the generals say, look, this

0:05:04.920 --> 0:05:06.600
<v Speaker 2>is a good idea, this is where we should drop

0:05:06.600 --> 0:05:10.520
<v Speaker 2>the bomb, and you know, Stimson basically springs to action

0:05:10.600 --> 0:05:13.400
<v Speaker 2>because they the generals started calling it his pet city

0:05:13.440 --> 0:05:16.320
<v Speaker 2>because he kept talking about it, and he twice met

0:05:16.320 --> 0:05:18.359
<v Speaker 2>with President Truman in person, we have records of the

0:05:18.360 --> 0:05:20.919
<v Speaker 2>meetings and so on, and basically said you have to

0:05:20.920 --> 0:05:23.719
<v Speaker 2>take this off the list, and eventually Truman relents, and

0:05:23.800 --> 0:05:26.760
<v Speaker 2>so the first bomb gets dropped on Hiroshima instead. Now

0:05:26.800 --> 0:05:28.360
<v Speaker 2>the second bomb is supposed to go to a place

0:05:28.400 --> 0:05:31.680
<v Speaker 2>called Kokura, and as the bomber gets to Kokura, there's

0:05:31.720 --> 0:05:34.279
<v Speaker 2>briefly cloud cover, and they don't want to accidentally drop

0:05:34.320 --> 0:05:36.680
<v Speaker 2>the bomb somewhere that's not the city, because of course

0:05:36.720 --> 0:05:39.480
<v Speaker 2>that would not have the same effect. So they decide

0:05:39.520 --> 0:05:41.320
<v Speaker 2>to go to the secondary target, which is Nagasaki.

0:05:41.480 --> 0:05:43.919
<v Speaker 1>They literally do a loop to see, hey, maybe it

0:05:43.960 --> 0:05:47.440
<v Speaker 1>clears up, it doesn't, yeah, and onto Nagasak exactly.

0:05:47.600 --> 0:05:50.680
<v Speaker 2>They actually, I think, do loops until they're running low

0:05:50.680 --> 0:05:52.560
<v Speaker 2>on fuel and they're starting to think, okay, we're not

0:05:52.600 --> 0:05:54.960
<v Speaker 2>going to make it to the secondary target, so they finally,

0:05:55.040 --> 0:05:57.440
<v Speaker 2>you know, pull the plug on Kokura, dropped the bomb

0:05:57.440 --> 0:05:59.960
<v Speaker 2>on Nagasaki. So hundreds of thousands of people live or

0:06:00.120 --> 0:06:02.679
<v Speaker 2>die in these in these cities based on a nineteen

0:06:02.760 --> 0:06:05.520
<v Speaker 2>year old vacation and a cloud. And the point that

0:06:05.600 --> 0:06:08.240
<v Speaker 2>I think is important to realize here is that, you know,

0:06:08.279 --> 0:06:10.120
<v Speaker 2>if you were modeling this, if you're trying to say, like,

0:06:10.160 --> 0:06:12.120
<v Speaker 2>how is the US government going to determine where to

0:06:12.160 --> 0:06:14.640
<v Speaker 2>drop the atomic bomb? You would not put in your

0:06:14.640 --> 0:06:18.279
<v Speaker 2>model the vacation histories of American government officials or like

0:06:18.360 --> 0:06:20.320
<v Speaker 2>cloud cover, right, you would come up with these very

0:06:20.360 --> 0:06:23.320
<v Speaker 2>obvious big things like where are the places that have

0:06:23.440 --> 0:06:26.080
<v Speaker 2>strategic importance or propaganda value, And if you did that,

0:06:26.120 --> 0:06:28.000
<v Speaker 2>you probably would put Kyoto on top of the list,

0:06:28.240 --> 0:06:30.160
<v Speaker 2>and you get the wrong answer. And you wouldn't get

0:06:30.160 --> 0:06:31.840
<v Speaker 2>the wrong answer because you were stupid. You'd get the

0:06:31.880 --> 0:06:35.279
<v Speaker 2>wrong answer because sometimes things that don't seem to be

0:06:35.279 --> 0:06:38.279
<v Speaker 2>important actually end up being the most important factor in

0:06:38.360 --> 0:06:38.840
<v Speaker 2>an outcome.

0:06:39.240 --> 0:06:43.160
<v Speaker 1>And the Japanese actually have an expression Kokura's luck. Tell

0:06:43.240 --> 0:06:45.159
<v Speaker 1>us what that means to the Japanese.

0:06:45.279 --> 0:06:47.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think this is a very useful thing to

0:06:47.000 --> 0:06:49.599
<v Speaker 2>think about. It's Kokura's luck refers to when you unknowingly

0:06:49.720 --> 0:06:52.520
<v Speaker 2>escape disaster. So it was a long time before the

0:06:52.600 --> 0:06:55.120
<v Speaker 2>US government acknowledged that they were planning to drop the

0:06:55.120 --> 0:06:57.400
<v Speaker 2>bomb on Kokura. So you know, hundreds of thousands of

0:06:57.400 --> 0:06:59.279
<v Speaker 2>people in that city had no idea there was an

0:06:59.320 --> 0:07:01.839
<v Speaker 2>airplane over them that, but for a cloud, would have

0:07:01.839 --> 0:07:05.120
<v Speaker 2>incinerated the entire city and killed most of them. And

0:07:05.200 --> 0:07:06.799
<v Speaker 2>so I think this is the kind of thing where,

0:07:06.839 --> 0:07:08.760
<v Speaker 2>you know, one of the ideas that is central to

0:07:09.040 --> 0:07:11.400
<v Speaker 2>the argument in Fluke is that these sorts of things,

0:07:11.400 --> 0:07:13.560
<v Speaker 2>this Kokura's luck, is happening to us all the time, right,

0:07:13.600 --> 0:07:17.040
<v Speaker 2>we were completely oblivious to the diversions in our lives

0:07:17.080 --> 0:07:20.880
<v Speaker 2>and our societies, the alternative possible history simply because we

0:07:20.920 --> 0:07:23.280
<v Speaker 2>can only experience one reality. And what we do is

0:07:23.280 --> 0:07:26.520
<v Speaker 2>we've then stitch a narrative back where it's A to B.

0:07:26.680 --> 0:07:28.840
<v Speaker 2>This makes complete sense. Here are the five reasons why

0:07:28.880 --> 0:07:31.000
<v Speaker 2>this happened. And in fact, I think this is a

0:07:31.000 --> 0:07:33.120
<v Speaker 2>way that we end up deluding ourselves into a neater

0:07:33.400 --> 0:07:35.080
<v Speaker 2>and tidier version of the real world.

0:07:35.160 --> 0:07:39.200
<v Speaker 1>So you describe why we can't know what matters most

0:07:39.280 --> 0:07:43.200
<v Speaker 1>because we can't see the alternative universes. I love this quote.

0:07:43.560 --> 0:07:47.440
<v Speaker 1>We ignore the invisible pivots, the moments that we will

0:07:47.480 --> 0:07:51.200
<v Speaker 1>never realize we're consequential, the near misses and near hits

0:07:51.240 --> 0:07:54.280
<v Speaker 1>that are unknown to us because we've never seen and

0:07:54.360 --> 0:07:59.520
<v Speaker 1>will never see, our alternative possible lives. That's really very

0:07:59.640 --> 0:08:03.160
<v Speaker 1>chilling to know that we're just walking through life unaware

0:08:03.320 --> 0:08:06.880
<v Speaker 1>that hey, atomic bomb over our head. Better hope the

0:08:06.920 --> 0:08:08.040
<v Speaker 1>clouds don't clear up.

0:08:08.360 --> 0:08:10.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I have this saying that I refer to a

0:08:10.000 --> 0:08:12.440
<v Speaker 2>lot in the book, which is that we control nothing,

0:08:12.480 --> 0:08:14.600
<v Speaker 2>but we influence everything. And this is when you think

0:08:14.600 --> 0:08:16.960
<v Speaker 2>about this in our own lives. I think this is

0:08:16.960 --> 0:08:20.040
<v Speaker 2>something where you realize that there are these diversions happening constantly.

0:08:20.080 --> 0:08:22.120
<v Speaker 2>There's a film in the nineteen nineties with Gwyneth Peltrow

0:08:22.120 --> 0:08:24.960
<v Speaker 2>called Sliding Doors, and it has this idea and I

0:08:25.040 --> 0:08:27.600
<v Speaker 2>sort of riff on that with this concept I coined

0:08:27.640 --> 0:08:30.600
<v Speaker 2>called the snooze button effect, where you imagine that you

0:08:30.600 --> 0:08:32.480
<v Speaker 2>know it's Tuesday morning, you're a little bit groggy, you

0:08:32.520 --> 0:08:35.360
<v Speaker 2>wake up, the snooze button beckons to you, you slap it,

0:08:35.440 --> 0:08:37.959
<v Speaker 2>and you get delayed by five minutes. You imagine you're

0:08:38.000 --> 0:08:40.640
<v Speaker 2>now your life rewinds by thirty seconds and you say,

0:08:40.720 --> 0:08:42.440
<v Speaker 2>uh no, I won't hit the snooze button. I'll get

0:08:42.440 --> 0:08:45.760
<v Speaker 2>out of bed. Now. I think that has changed your life. Now,

0:08:45.800 --> 0:08:47.600
<v Speaker 2>the question is how much has it change your life?

0:08:47.600 --> 0:08:49.959
<v Speaker 2>And under some short time scales, maybe things sort of

0:08:49.960 --> 0:08:52.240
<v Speaker 2>get ironed out in the end. But you're gonna have

0:08:52.280 --> 0:08:54.640
<v Speaker 2>different conversations that day, You're gonna talk to different people,

0:08:54.679 --> 0:08:56.600
<v Speaker 2>you might get in a car accident in some days, right.

0:08:56.760 --> 0:08:58.120
<v Speaker 2>I mean, these are the kinds of things that we

0:08:58.200 --> 0:09:00.880
<v Speaker 2>sort of are oblivious to, and I think when you

0:09:00.920 --> 0:09:03.040
<v Speaker 2>think about them. With social change, it's happening all the

0:09:03.040 --> 0:09:05.440
<v Speaker 2>time too. I mean, there's just so many ways that

0:09:05.480 --> 0:09:07.640
<v Speaker 2>the world could have unfolded differently, but for a few

0:09:07.640 --> 0:09:09.960
<v Speaker 2>small changes. I mean, you know, you think about even

0:09:10.000 --> 0:09:12.760
<v Speaker 2>like nine to eleven. We think about all the variables

0:09:12.760 --> 0:09:14.200
<v Speaker 2>that go into nine to eleven. One of them that

0:09:14.200 --> 0:09:16.280
<v Speaker 2>people don't talk about was the weather. It was an

0:09:16.280 --> 0:09:19.440
<v Speaker 2>incredibly blue, blue sky day, Chris. Yeah, and if you

0:09:19.520 --> 0:09:22.760
<v Speaker 2>had if you had a you know, very very cloudy

0:09:22.800 --> 0:09:24.600
<v Speaker 2>day or storm, some of the planes wouldn't have taken

0:09:24.640 --> 0:09:26.040
<v Speaker 2>off on time. They might have had a chance to

0:09:26.040 --> 0:09:28.080
<v Speaker 2>foil some of the plots. Or if you had had

0:09:28.120 --> 0:09:30.520
<v Speaker 2>a different slate of passengers on flight ninety three, So

0:09:30.559 --> 0:09:33.640
<v Speaker 2>if it had gone September tenth or September twelfth, maybe

0:09:33.640 --> 0:09:36.200
<v Speaker 2>those passengers don't take down the plane, Maybe the White

0:09:36.240 --> 0:09:39.240
<v Speaker 2>House or the capital's destroyed, and then the world's different.

0:09:39.280 --> 0:09:41.000
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you know, can you imagine how it would

0:09:41.040 --> 0:09:44.320
<v Speaker 2>change America or geopolitics if there was no White House anymore?

0:09:44.520 --> 0:09:46.079
<v Speaker 2>So I think these are the kinds of things where,

0:09:46.440 --> 0:09:49.920
<v Speaker 2>you know, you just imagine that there's this straight line

0:09:49.960 --> 0:09:52.119
<v Speaker 2>of cause and effect, and of course when we experience

0:09:52.160 --> 0:09:55.480
<v Speaker 2>the world, we then explain it. But you know, these

0:09:55.520 --> 0:09:58.360
<v Speaker 2>small changes could really reshape the future. Some of them

0:09:58.360 --> 0:10:00.880
<v Speaker 2>are going to be more consequential, like that Kyoto story,

0:10:01.360 --> 0:10:02.920
<v Speaker 2>others are going to, you know, be a little bit

0:10:02.960 --> 0:10:05.600
<v Speaker 2>less consequential, at least on human time scales. But the

0:10:05.600 --> 0:10:07.679
<v Speaker 2>point is we can't know, and I think that's something

0:10:07.679 --> 0:10:09.160
<v Speaker 2>that is bewildering to think about.

0:10:09.559 --> 0:10:13.480
<v Speaker 1>So can we actually identify cause and effect? We tell

0:10:13.520 --> 0:10:18.680
<v Speaker 1>ourselves stories. We have not only narrative fallacy in everything

0:10:18.720 --> 0:10:21.600
<v Speaker 1>we do because we love a good plot line, but

0:10:21.640 --> 0:10:24.880
<v Speaker 1>there's also hindsight by us where we imagine, oh, I

0:10:24.960 --> 0:10:28.480
<v Speaker 1>knew this was coming all along, and you know, can

0:10:28.559 --> 0:10:32.880
<v Speaker 1>we really truly know the impact of what how a

0:10:33.160 --> 0:10:35.920
<v Speaker 1>leads to be or how something that we think is

0:10:35.960 --> 0:10:39.880
<v Speaker 1>completely meaningless actually has deep significance.

0:10:40.200 --> 0:10:42.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So I very much subscribe to this view that

0:10:42.160 --> 0:10:44.120
<v Speaker 2>all models are wrong, but some are useful. I don't

0:10:44.120 --> 0:10:45.959
<v Speaker 2>think X yes exactly, But I think that one of

0:10:46.000 --> 0:10:48.120
<v Speaker 2>the things that has been lost on us is I

0:10:48.120 --> 0:10:50.040
<v Speaker 2>think there's so much of the world that runs on

0:10:50.120 --> 0:10:54.439
<v Speaker 2>models that we sometimes forget that they are extremely simplified

0:10:54.480 --> 0:10:57.280
<v Speaker 2>abstractions of reality and that we actually don't understand how

0:10:57.280 --> 0:11:00.800
<v Speaker 2>the causation works. And I think that creates hubrist that's dangerous. So,

0:11:01.480 --> 0:11:03.480
<v Speaker 2>you know, when you think about why the atomic bomb

0:11:03.520 --> 0:11:05.600
<v Speaker 2>ended up getting dropped on Hiroshima. There are an infinite

0:11:05.679 --> 0:11:07.440
<v Speaker 2>number of causes, and they're things that we would not

0:11:07.480 --> 0:11:10.959
<v Speaker 2>think about. Right. Geological forces for gen uranium millions of

0:11:11.040 --> 0:11:13.640
<v Speaker 2>years ago is part of that story. Einstein being born

0:11:13.720 --> 0:11:15.640
<v Speaker 2>is part of that story. The Battle of Midway pivoting

0:11:15.720 --> 0:11:19.040
<v Speaker 2>on a fluke event where the US wins because they

0:11:19.080 --> 0:11:21.439
<v Speaker 2>just happen to stumble upon the Japanese fleet at the

0:11:21.480 --> 0:11:23.400
<v Speaker 2>right moment, right. I mean, if any of these things

0:11:23.440 --> 0:11:25.600
<v Speaker 2>have been different, there's like there's an almost infinite number

0:11:25.600 --> 0:11:27.440
<v Speaker 2>of them where little tweak would have been different, a

0:11:27.440 --> 0:11:30.520
<v Speaker 2>different outcome would have happened. Now, for the useful navigation

0:11:30.600 --> 0:11:32.960
<v Speaker 2>of society, we have to simplify reality because we can't

0:11:32.960 --> 0:11:36.040
<v Speaker 2>build a model that has nine hundred thousand variables, right,

0:11:36.520 --> 0:11:39.120
<v Speaker 2>So what you instead do is you sort of say, Okay,

0:11:39.160 --> 0:11:42.160
<v Speaker 2>this is a crude version of reality. And I think, like,

0:11:42.200 --> 0:11:44.320
<v Speaker 2>you know, one of the things that is really useful

0:11:44.360 --> 0:11:47.320
<v Speaker 2>about some models, like Google Maps, for example, we know

0:11:47.440 --> 0:11:49.240
<v Speaker 2>that's not the world, right, we know the map is

0:11:49.280 --> 0:11:51.040
<v Speaker 2>not the territory. You look at Google Maps and you're

0:11:51.080 --> 0:11:53.160
<v Speaker 2>not like, oh, well, I imagine that that's what the

0:11:53.200 --> 0:11:55.520
<v Speaker 2>real world looks like. It's a clear abstraction. I think

0:11:55.520 --> 0:11:59.280
<v Speaker 2>when we start to get into forecasting and other modeling

0:11:59.360 --> 0:12:01.880
<v Speaker 2>of social ties change, I think we lose sight of

0:12:01.920 --> 0:12:04.840
<v Speaker 2>the fact that we have a Google Maps distortion and

0:12:04.840 --> 0:12:07.520
<v Speaker 2>that we're actually looking at something that is potentially useful

0:12:07.559 --> 0:12:10.400
<v Speaker 2>to navigate but is very, very different from the real world.

0:12:10.760 --> 0:12:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Huh. Really interesting. So let's talk about the way different

0:12:16.440 --> 0:12:23.120
<v Speaker 1>schools of thought perceive and manage these philosophical differences. You

0:12:23.520 --> 0:12:29.000
<v Speaker 1>point out Eastern and Western thinking have a very different

0:12:29.080 --> 0:12:34.000
<v Speaker 1>set of precepts because of just the nature of each society.

0:12:34.960 --> 0:12:38.280
<v Speaker 1>In the Bible, in Genesis, God proclaims, let us make

0:12:38.360 --> 0:12:42.560
<v Speaker 1>man in our image after our likeness, and let them

0:12:42.559 --> 0:12:44.960
<v Speaker 1>have dominion over the fishes, the foul of the cattle, etc.

0:12:45.600 --> 0:12:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Eastern culture takes a whole lot more of a collectivist approach,

0:12:50.520 --> 0:12:53.680
<v Speaker 1>where you're part of a group, not you were made

0:12:53.679 --> 0:12:57.120
<v Speaker 1>in God's images. Tell us a little bit about how

0:12:57.160 --> 0:13:02.480
<v Speaker 1>this schism developed and what is the relationship of chaos

0:13:02.520 --> 0:13:03.000
<v Speaker 1>theory to.

0:13:02.960 --> 0:13:06.439
<v Speaker 2>Each Yeah, so this is a speculative theory, but it's

0:13:06.480 --> 0:13:09.400
<v Speaker 2>a theory that suggests that the reason why Eastern cultures

0:13:09.400 --> 0:13:12.880
<v Speaker 2>have much more relational concepts of interconnectivity between humans and

0:13:13.000 --> 0:13:15.920
<v Speaker 2>the rest of the world and human society as well,

0:13:16.520 --> 0:13:21.040
<v Speaker 2>is derived from the differences or proximity, rather that humans

0:13:21.080 --> 0:13:24.320
<v Speaker 2>have to primates, for example, in their own cultures. So

0:13:24.360 --> 0:13:26.480
<v Speaker 2>there's lots of monkey gods and so on, and there's

0:13:26.480 --> 0:13:28.680
<v Speaker 2>also course lots of monkeys in many of these cultures

0:13:28.720 --> 0:13:32.439
<v Speaker 2>that are developing. And the idea is that the hypothesis

0:13:33.000 --> 0:13:36.600
<v Speaker 2>is that this meant that people could not avoid the

0:13:36.600 --> 0:13:39.480
<v Speaker 2>commonality that we have with the rest of the world. Right,

0:13:39.720 --> 0:13:42.040
<v Speaker 2>whereas if you think about like biblical societies, if you

0:13:42.200 --> 0:13:44.800
<v Speaker 2>look at animals and you see camels, you think like, hey,

0:13:45.320 --> 0:13:47.280
<v Speaker 2>we are super different. We are separate from the rest

0:13:47.280 --> 0:13:49.160
<v Speaker 2>of the world. So the argument is that over the

0:13:49.200 --> 0:13:53.400
<v Speaker 2>long stretch of civilization that this created a slightly different

0:13:53.400 --> 0:13:57.080
<v Speaker 2>mentality that then manifests in what was called relational versus

0:13:57.160 --> 0:14:01.680
<v Speaker 2>atomistic thinking, and Western society is atomistic thinking on steroids,

0:14:01.720 --> 0:14:04.120
<v Speaker 2>which is to say, you know, I mean the American

0:14:04.200 --> 0:14:07.319
<v Speaker 2>dream is very atomistic individualist. It's like, you know, if

0:14:07.360 --> 0:14:10.120
<v Speaker 2>you just want to succeed, then you have to do everything,

0:14:10.520 --> 0:14:14.080
<v Speaker 2>whereas the relational concepts are much more about the interconnections

0:14:14.120 --> 0:14:16.280
<v Speaker 2>that people have. And so I think that also tells

0:14:16.320 --> 0:14:18.320
<v Speaker 2>you how you think about society right. Social change is

0:14:18.320 --> 0:14:21.480
<v Speaker 2>either driven by individuals or's driven by systems. And I

0:14:21.480 --> 0:14:24.880
<v Speaker 2>think that there is a way in which Western culture,

0:14:24.920 --> 0:14:27.520
<v Speaker 2>I think, can learn to actually appreciate some of the

0:14:27.560 --> 0:14:31.200
<v Speaker 2>complexity of social change more with a healthy, increased dose

0:14:31.280 --> 0:14:32.640
<v Speaker 2>of relational thinking.

0:14:33.120 --> 0:14:36.320
<v Speaker 1>And you kind of bring the Eastern and Western philosophies

0:14:36.400 --> 0:14:41.120
<v Speaker 1>together where you discuss the overview effects. And it really

0:14:41.160 --> 0:14:46.600
<v Speaker 1>begins with the United States. Western society sends astronauts to

0:14:46.720 --> 0:14:51.480
<v Speaker 1>the moon, sends astronauts around around the Earth. And these

0:14:51.520 --> 0:14:54.680
<v Speaker 1>astronauts are chosen out of off and out of the military,

0:14:54.680 --> 0:14:59.320
<v Speaker 1>out of the Air Force. They're pilots, their logical they're

0:14:59.560 --> 0:15:05.000
<v Speaker 1>unfeel they're supposed to be essentially soldiers, and yet all

0:15:05.040 --> 0:15:08.240
<v Speaker 1>of them have this impact when they see the blue,

0:15:08.240 --> 0:15:12.560
<v Speaker 1>green Earth in its entirety from space. They all describe

0:15:12.560 --> 0:15:17.880
<v Speaker 1>it as being overwhelmed by a life shattering epiphany on

0:15:18.040 --> 0:15:22.720
<v Speaker 1>the interconnection of everything. That doesn't sound very Western, that

0:15:22.800 --> 0:15:25.920
<v Speaker 1>sounds more like an Eastern philosophy. But this has been

0:15:26.080 --> 0:15:28.520
<v Speaker 1>time and time again. Lots of astronauts have had this.

0:15:28.800 --> 0:15:30.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there's you know, there's funny because there's been like

0:15:31.240 --> 0:15:36.400
<v Speaker 2>nine five hundred generations of modern humans, and four hundred

0:15:36.440 --> 0:15:39.239
<v Speaker 2>and ninety seven of them have not seen the earth, right,

0:15:39.560 --> 0:15:42.160
<v Speaker 2>So when people do see the earth, they have this

0:15:42.200 --> 0:15:44.160
<v Speaker 2>profound epiphany. And as you say, you know, they're worried

0:15:44.200 --> 0:15:47.120
<v Speaker 2>about sending up you know, philosophers and poets, because they

0:15:47.120 --> 0:15:49.640
<v Speaker 2>figured they'd be overwhelmed by the sort of existential awe

0:15:49.720 --> 0:15:51.200
<v Speaker 2>and like, you know, would forget to hit the right

0:15:51.240 --> 0:15:52.840
<v Speaker 2>buttons or whatever. So they pick these people who are

0:15:52.880 --> 0:15:55.680
<v Speaker 2>supposed to be robots effectively in their personality, and all

0:15:55.680 --> 0:15:58.560
<v Speaker 2>of them still have this incredible sort of epiphany about

0:15:58.560 --> 0:16:00.240
<v Speaker 2>the interconnection of the world because you look at the

0:16:00.280 --> 0:16:03.160
<v Speaker 2>single planet and you think, okay, this is one structure.

0:16:03.520 --> 0:16:06.080
<v Speaker 2>This is not something where I'm this distinct bit. You're like,

0:16:06.160 --> 0:16:08.840
<v Speaker 2>this is all together right now. I think what's really

0:16:08.840 --> 0:16:12.080
<v Speaker 2>striking about that is that those world views do shape

0:16:12.120 --> 0:16:14.720
<v Speaker 2>your thinking around social change. And I think when you

0:16:14.760 --> 0:16:17.240
<v Speaker 2>start to think that you are in control rather than

0:16:17.240 --> 0:16:19.520
<v Speaker 2>an agent of influence, you have a different worldview. When

0:16:19.560 --> 0:16:22.080
<v Speaker 2>you start to think that you're individual rather relational, you

0:16:22.120 --> 0:16:24.080
<v Speaker 2>have a different worldview. And all these things feed into

0:16:24.080 --> 0:16:25.960
<v Speaker 2>the ways that we set up models that we sort

0:16:25.960 --> 0:16:29.640
<v Speaker 2>of interact with our conceptions of social change. And so on,

0:16:29.920 --> 0:16:31.880
<v Speaker 2>and also the degree to which we have hubris that

0:16:31.880 --> 0:16:33.880
<v Speaker 2>we can control things. And I think this is where

0:16:33.880 --> 0:16:36.000
<v Speaker 2>the danger comes in. Right, It's not that you shouldn't model,

0:16:36.040 --> 0:16:38.560
<v Speaker 2>It's not that you shouldn't have abstractions of systems. It's

0:16:38.600 --> 0:16:40.520
<v Speaker 2>that when you start to get hubristic about it and

0:16:40.600 --> 0:16:43.800
<v Speaker 2>think you have top down individualists control, you start to

0:16:43.800 --> 0:16:47.040
<v Speaker 2>get overconfident in ways that you try to tame something

0:16:47.040 --> 0:16:49.240
<v Speaker 2>that I think is untamable. And this is where we

0:16:49.280 --> 0:16:51.600
<v Speaker 2>get shocks more often, because you try to impose this

0:16:51.680 --> 0:16:55.160
<v Speaker 2>sort of control on a system that is so complex

0:16:55.520 --> 0:16:57.800
<v Speaker 2>that it resists control. And so you know, there's some

0:16:57.800 --> 0:17:00.320
<v Speaker 2>of these things where I think the insights the flawosophy

0:17:00.400 --> 0:17:04.160
<v Speaker 2>behind this it's it's sort of lurking there invisibly, where

0:17:04.240 --> 0:17:06.119
<v Speaker 2>no one says this when they build a model, but

0:17:06.160 --> 0:17:08.679
<v Speaker 2>it's it's obviously shaping the way they think about it

0:17:08.720 --> 0:17:11.200
<v Speaker 2>and their sort of assumptions before they go into trying

0:17:11.240 --> 0:17:13.680
<v Speaker 2>to determine how to navigate risk and uncertainty.

0:17:13.960 --> 0:17:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Along those lines, you have a great quote in the book.

0:17:17.200 --> 0:17:20.400
<v Speaker 1>God may have created the clock, but it was Newton's

0:17:20.440 --> 0:17:23.760
<v Speaker 1>laws that kept it ticking. So so how do you

0:17:25.080 --> 0:17:32.000
<v Speaker 1>resolve that inherent tension between big forces driving things or

0:17:32.080 --> 0:17:36.880
<v Speaker 1>random elements affecting it, or is there no resolving them.

0:17:36.920 --> 0:17:37.680
<v Speaker 1>They both matter.

0:17:38.520 --> 0:17:40.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So I think it's a question of time scales,

0:17:41.080 --> 0:17:42.399
<v Speaker 2>and I think one of the big one of the

0:17:42.400 --> 0:17:44.280
<v Speaker 2>big problems. And this is something that I you know,

0:17:44.320 --> 0:17:46.679
<v Speaker 2>it's always it's it's such a nuanced concept that it's

0:17:46.720 --> 0:17:48.520
<v Speaker 2>sometimes difficult to explain. But I think there's a really

0:17:48.520 --> 0:17:53.680
<v Speaker 2>important point about whether ideas that happen for a long

0:17:53.720 --> 0:17:55.760
<v Speaker 2>time seem to be validated by what goes on the

0:17:55.800 --> 0:17:58.920
<v Speaker 2>patterns that we see, right, whether you can actually falsify

0:17:58.920 --> 0:18:01.040
<v Speaker 2>a theory when you're talking about social change. So my

0:18:01.080 --> 0:18:05.399
<v Speaker 2>favorite example of this is the Arab Spring in political science,

0:18:05.440 --> 0:18:07.800
<v Speaker 2>my own realm, there is a lot of stuff written

0:18:07.920 --> 0:18:09.720
<v Speaker 2>in sort of two thousand and eight, two thousand and nine,

0:18:09.880 --> 0:18:13.240
<v Speaker 2>even into twenty ten that says, here's why Middle Eastern

0:18:13.280 --> 0:18:16.320
<v Speaker 2>dictatorships are extremely resilient, and there's all this data showing

0:18:16.359 --> 0:18:18.639
<v Speaker 2>this the longevity, et cetera, et cetera, and then like

0:18:18.680 --> 0:18:20.520
<v Speaker 2>within six months of some of these books coming out,

0:18:20.840 --> 0:18:22.360
<v Speaker 2>you know, all of them are on fire. I mean,

0:18:22.560 --> 0:18:24.359
<v Speaker 2>I saw a political risk map when I was in

0:18:24.400 --> 0:18:26.879
<v Speaker 2>grad school where like every single country that was on

0:18:26.920 --> 0:18:28.879
<v Speaker 2>fire was green on the political risk map from the

0:18:28.880 --> 0:18:32.040
<v Speaker 2>previous year. Right now, There's two ways of thinking about that.

0:18:32.080 --> 0:18:35.240
<v Speaker 2>The first way is to say the theory has been falsified.

0:18:35.440 --> 0:18:38.119
<v Speaker 2>They were wrong, right. The second way of thinking about is,

0:18:38.160 --> 0:18:40.679
<v Speaker 2>hold on, maybe the world changed, Maybe the patterns of

0:18:40.720 --> 0:18:43.400
<v Speaker 2>cause and effect have actually shifted, right. And I think

0:18:43.440 --> 0:18:45.760
<v Speaker 2>this is something that people don't appreciate that much, is

0:18:45.760 --> 0:18:48.160
<v Speaker 2>they assume that the patterns of the past are going

0:18:48.200 --> 0:18:50.000
<v Speaker 2>to be predictive of the patterns of the future. I mean,

0:18:50.040 --> 0:18:52.280
<v Speaker 2>David Hume came up with this idea hundreds of years ago,

0:18:52.600 --> 0:18:55.080
<v Speaker 2>but it is something that I think is particularly important

0:18:55.080 --> 0:18:58.280
<v Speaker 2>for our world because the patterns of the past being

0:18:58.359 --> 0:19:01.000
<v Speaker 2>indicative of the patterns of the future has ever before

0:19:01.200 --> 0:19:04.240
<v Speaker 2>been as flawed of an assumption, because our world is

0:19:04.320 --> 0:19:06.600
<v Speaker 2>changing faster than ever before. So I think one of

0:19:06.680 --> 0:19:08.400
<v Speaker 2>the issues that we have is when we think about

0:19:08.400 --> 0:19:10.520
<v Speaker 2>these sort of clockwork models where we say, oh, yes,

0:19:10.680 --> 0:19:12.280
<v Speaker 2>you know, these are the ways that things have worked

0:19:12.280 --> 0:19:15.520
<v Speaker 2>in the past. Our world is very very different year

0:19:15.520 --> 0:19:17.200
<v Speaker 2>to year, and that didn't used to happen. I mean

0:19:17.440 --> 0:19:19.200
<v Speaker 2>I was talking before about these you know, nine thou

0:19:19.359 --> 0:19:22.920
<v Speaker 2>five hundred generations of humans. If you think about the

0:19:23.000 --> 0:19:26.480
<v Speaker 2>sort of entirety of human history as a twenty four

0:19:26.520 --> 0:19:29.359
<v Speaker 2>hour day, twenty three hours and like ten minutes is

0:19:29.440 --> 0:19:32.359
<v Speaker 2>hunter gatherer period, right, and then you get into farming,

0:19:32.359 --> 0:19:34.239
<v Speaker 2>which is another like thirty minutes, and then you've got,

0:19:34.320 --> 0:19:36.760
<v Speaker 2>you know, a few minutes for the industrial revolution, and

0:19:36.800 --> 0:19:38.439
<v Speaker 2>you get to the information age, which we're in now,

0:19:38.440 --> 0:19:40.679
<v Speaker 2>which is like eleven seconds right in this in this

0:19:40.720 --> 0:19:43.360
<v Speaker 2>one day o'clock. And I think the point that's important

0:19:43.400 --> 0:19:46.280
<v Speaker 2>here is that if we base almost all of our

0:19:46.320 --> 0:19:49.320
<v Speaker 2>decision making and almost all of our models on causal

0:19:49.359 --> 0:19:52.280
<v Speaker 2>inference from past patterns of behavior, but the world is

0:19:52.359 --> 0:19:55.479
<v Speaker 2>changing year to year, then the assumptions we're making are

0:19:55.480 --> 0:19:57.600
<v Speaker 2>becoming more and more short lived. And I think that's

0:19:57.640 --> 0:20:02.439
<v Speaker 2>where we're embedding risk into are thinking, because we have

0:20:02.560 --> 0:20:04.719
<v Speaker 2>no other way of inferring cause and effect other than

0:20:04.760 --> 0:20:07.320
<v Speaker 2>past patterns. There's no alternative. That's what Hume says. He's like,

0:20:07.560 --> 0:20:09.160
<v Speaker 2>this is the only way we can understand the world

0:20:09.240 --> 0:20:10.600
<v Speaker 2>is to look at what happened in the past. We

0:20:10.960 --> 0:20:12.960
<v Speaker 2>can't look into the future. So I think this is

0:20:13.000 --> 0:20:15.719
<v Speaker 2>something that I do worry about when I see a

0:20:15.720 --> 0:20:18.680
<v Speaker 2>lot of decision making built on this sort of mentality

0:20:18.680 --> 0:20:21.120
<v Speaker 2>of the clockwork model that like, oh, yes, well, it's

0:20:21.160 --> 0:20:23.080
<v Speaker 2>just going to keep ticking along. And you know, there's

0:20:23.080 --> 0:20:24.720
<v Speaker 2>a lot of very smart thinkers who have thought about

0:20:24.720 --> 0:20:26.440
<v Speaker 2>black swans and so on. I just think that we've

0:20:26.440 --> 0:20:28.840
<v Speaker 2>made a system where the black swans are actually going

0:20:28.880 --> 0:20:31.119
<v Speaker 2>to be more frequent. I think we've designed a system

0:20:31.160 --> 0:20:33.560
<v Speaker 2>that's more prone to systemic risks than before.

0:20:33.720 --> 0:20:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Especially given not only does information move fast than ever,

0:20:38.040 --> 0:20:42.480
<v Speaker 1>but we're more interconnected, we're more related, and it becomes

0:20:42.720 --> 0:20:46.520
<v Speaker 1>increasingly difficult, if not impossible, to figure out what are

0:20:46.560 --> 0:20:52.800
<v Speaker 1>the unanticipated results, consequences, side effects of anything that we do.

0:20:53.400 --> 0:20:54.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and this is you know, this is one of

0:20:54.640 --> 0:20:56.600
<v Speaker 2>those things where I think there's some there's some pretty

0:20:56.600 --> 0:20:59.520
<v Speaker 2>good examples from history of when somebody tries to control

0:20:59.560 --> 0:21:03.159
<v Speaker 2>a system that is uncontrollable and it backfires catastrophically. And

0:21:03.160 --> 0:21:06.600
<v Speaker 2>my favorite example is ihouldn't say favorite is horrible tragedy.

0:21:06.440 --> 0:21:09.760
<v Speaker 2>But the best illustration of this is Mao has this

0:21:09.880 --> 0:21:12.280
<v Speaker 2>idea in communist China. He has this idea. He says,

0:21:12.320 --> 0:21:14.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm we're gonna eradicate disease, and the way we're gonna do.

0:21:14.640 --> 0:21:17.080
<v Speaker 2>This is massive four pests campaigns, so we're gonna kill

0:21:17.080 --> 0:21:20.719
<v Speaker 2>all these pests. So he basically tells everyone just go

0:21:20.760 --> 0:21:23.639
<v Speaker 2>out and you know, kill all these various things that

0:21:23.640 --> 0:21:26.800
<v Speaker 2>potentially are vectors of disease. And what it ultimately does,

0:21:26.840 --> 0:21:29.119
<v Speaker 2>it leads to one of the worst famines in human

0:21:29.160 --> 0:21:33.080
<v Speaker 2>history because they've disrupted the ecosystem, and they figure, oh,

0:21:33.200 --> 0:21:34.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, as long as we just get rid of

0:21:34.520 --> 0:21:36.439
<v Speaker 2>these pests, it will be fine. What they actually have

0:21:36.520 --> 0:21:38.840
<v Speaker 2>done is they've made it to the crops fail and

0:21:38.920 --> 0:21:40.680
<v Speaker 2>so you know, this is the kind of stuff where

0:21:40.720 --> 0:21:44.159
<v Speaker 2>I think that's the it's the parable that warns us of,

0:21:44.400 --> 0:21:47.720
<v Speaker 2>you know, assuming that simply because we have either have

0:21:47.800 --> 0:21:50.040
<v Speaker 2>had some success in the past, or because our model

0:21:50.080 --> 0:21:52.360
<v Speaker 2>seems to guide us in this way, that we can

0:21:52.440 --> 0:21:55.440
<v Speaker 2>therefore insert ourselves into a system and not worry about

0:21:55.440 --> 0:21:57.760
<v Speaker 2>the unintended consequences. I think that's the kind of thing where,

0:21:57.960 --> 0:21:59.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, a lot of the people who are the

0:21:59.040 --> 0:22:01.120
<v Speaker 2>dumers in AI are talking about this. There are some

0:22:01.160 --> 0:22:05.200
<v Speaker 2>things where you know, when you have AI based decision making,

0:22:05.280 --> 0:22:07.800
<v Speaker 2>it is you know, the training data is the past.

0:22:08.160 --> 0:22:10.080
<v Speaker 2>So there are some things that I think are are

0:22:10.080 --> 0:22:13.000
<v Speaker 2>getting worse in this front, and we are also, as

0:22:13.000 --> 0:22:16.320
<v Speaker 2>you said, the interconnectivity. I mean, one of my favorite

0:22:16.359 --> 0:22:18.240
<v Speaker 2>examples of this is the Suez Canal boat. That the

0:22:18.280 --> 0:22:20.399
<v Speaker 2>infamous Suez Canal boat, right. I mean, you have a

0:22:20.440 --> 0:22:23.560
<v Speaker 2>gust of wind that hits a boat and twists its sideways,

0:22:23.560 --> 0:22:25.960
<v Speaker 2>it gets lodged in the canal, and the best estimate

0:22:26.000 --> 0:22:28.359
<v Speaker 2>I've seen is that it created fifty four billion dollars

0:22:28.359 --> 0:22:29.840
<v Speaker 2>of economic damage. And they said it was you know,

0:22:29.880 --> 0:22:31.919
<v Speaker 2>something like point two to point four percent of global

0:22:31.920 --> 0:22:35.320
<v Speaker 2>GDP could have been wiped off by this this one boat.

0:22:35.480 --> 0:22:38.200
<v Speaker 2>Now the question is is there ever another moment in

0:22:38.280 --> 0:22:41.159
<v Speaker 2>human history where one boat could do that? Right? And

0:22:41.200 --> 0:22:43.639
<v Speaker 2>I think the answer is quite clearly no. So the

0:22:43.920 --> 0:22:46.000
<v Speaker 2>I mean maybe the one that brought the plague, right, right,

0:22:46.800 --> 0:22:48.240
<v Speaker 2>But I mean this is the kind of stuff where

0:22:48.280 --> 0:22:49.840
<v Speaker 2>I think one of the one of the lessons that

0:22:49.920 --> 0:22:52.840
<v Speaker 2>I think is important is that there's a trade off

0:22:53.280 --> 0:22:56.800
<v Speaker 2>very often between optimization and resilience. And I think, you know,

0:22:56.840 --> 0:23:00.240
<v Speaker 2>we're told all the time efficiency and optimization are are,

0:23:00.520 --> 0:23:03.560
<v Speaker 2>you know, the guiding principles of so many of our systems,

0:23:04.040 --> 0:23:06.600
<v Speaker 2>but they come at a cost. They do create less resilience,

0:23:06.600 --> 0:23:09.600
<v Speaker 2>and I think there are some things where the long

0:23:09.720 --> 0:23:12.399
<v Speaker 2>term planning that we can do is to put a

0:23:12.400 --> 0:23:14.320
<v Speaker 2>little bit more into resilience and a little bit less

0:23:14.359 --> 0:23:16.600
<v Speaker 2>in optimization. It will cost us money in the short term,

0:23:16.720 --> 0:23:18.119
<v Speaker 2>but it will probably save us a hell of a

0:23:18.119 --> 0:23:19.440
<v Speaker 2>lot of money in the long term. Huh.

0:23:19.480 --> 0:23:23.280
<v Speaker 1>Really really interesting. So I found the book fascinating and

0:23:23.359 --> 0:23:27.919
<v Speaker 1>I really enjoyed where you go down the evolutionary biology

0:23:28.560 --> 0:23:33.840
<v Speaker 1>rabbit hole, starting with convergence is the everything happens for

0:23:33.920 --> 0:23:39.840
<v Speaker 1>a reason school of evolutionary biology. Contingency is the the

0:23:39.920 --> 0:23:43.840
<v Speaker 1>g rated version is stuff happens theory. Explain the difference

0:23:43.880 --> 0:23:44.520
<v Speaker 1>between the two.

0:23:45.240 --> 0:23:48.120
<v Speaker 2>Yes, So I think that evolutionary biology has a lot

0:23:48.160 --> 0:23:50.840
<v Speaker 2>to teach us about understanding change. It's a historical science

0:23:50.840 --> 0:23:53.200
<v Speaker 2>and they're trying to understand, you know, the origin story

0:23:53.200 --> 0:23:56.320
<v Speaker 2>of species, and they're thinking about cause and effect, just

0:23:56.359 --> 0:23:59.480
<v Speaker 2>as people in economics and politics are as well. And

0:23:59.520 --> 0:24:02.240
<v Speaker 2>so these two ideas they're very simple to understand with

0:24:02.280 --> 0:24:05.240
<v Speaker 2>two examples. The first example of contingency is the asteroid

0:24:05.280 --> 0:24:08.640
<v Speaker 2>that wipes out the dinosaurs. Now, if this asteroid, which

0:24:08.680 --> 0:24:11.280
<v Speaker 2>was by the way, was produced by an oscillation in

0:24:11.320 --> 0:24:13.359
<v Speaker 2>a place called the ort cloud in the distant reaches

0:24:13.400 --> 0:24:14.200
<v Speaker 2>of space.

0:24:14.320 --> 0:24:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Absolute outer ring of assorted Detrius that surrounds the entire

0:24:20.400 --> 0:24:22.400
<v Speaker 1>Solar System beyond Pluto.

0:24:22.520 --> 0:24:26.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. So this oscillation flings this space rock towards Earth

0:24:26.800 --> 0:24:30.119
<v Speaker 2>and it hits in the most destructive way possible. It

0:24:30.200 --> 0:24:31.960
<v Speaker 2>hits in the ocean in a way that brings up

0:24:32.000 --> 0:24:35.360
<v Speaker 2>a lot of toxic gas and effectively incinerates the dinosaurs

0:24:35.400 --> 0:24:37.520
<v Speaker 2>because the surface temperature went up to about the same

0:24:37.560 --> 0:24:40.119
<v Speaker 2>level as a broiled chicken. I mean, it was deadly

0:24:40.240 --> 0:24:42.639
<v Speaker 2>right now. The reason this is important is because if

0:24:42.640 --> 0:24:44.360
<v Speaker 2>it had hit a slightly different place on the Earth,

0:24:44.400 --> 0:24:45.840
<v Speaker 2>the dinosaurs probably went to died out.

0:24:46.040 --> 0:24:48.560
<v Speaker 1>And let me just point out, and you mentioned this

0:24:48.640 --> 0:24:50.439
<v Speaker 1>in the book. It's not like if it hits a

0:24:50.480 --> 0:24:56.200
<v Speaker 1>different continent five seconds earlier, five seconds later, it completely

0:24:56.280 --> 0:25:00.480
<v Speaker 1>misses that sulfur rich if miss at the in the

0:25:00.560 --> 0:25:02.639
<v Speaker 1>Yucatan Peninsula.

0:25:02.840 --> 0:25:04.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so, I mean, you know, this is the kind

0:25:04.760 --> 0:25:06.960
<v Speaker 2>of stuff where you think about it and it is

0:25:07.240 --> 0:25:10.880
<v Speaker 2>very unsettling because you can imagine everything that humans have done, right,

0:25:11.200 --> 0:25:13.240
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you have a second difference in this asteroid.

0:25:13.240 --> 0:25:16.359
<v Speaker 2>There's no humans because the extinction of the dinosaurs is

0:25:16.359 --> 0:25:18.359
<v Speaker 2>what led to the rise of mammals and eventually the

0:25:18.359 --> 0:25:21.400
<v Speaker 2>evolution of us. And so this is contingency. It's where

0:25:21.440 --> 0:25:25.520
<v Speaker 2>this small change could radically reshape the future. Now, convergence

0:25:25.640 --> 0:25:28.399
<v Speaker 2>is the alternative hypothesis, and they both exist, right, the

0:25:28.520 --> 0:25:31.960
<v Speaker 2>sort of order and disorder and convergence says, Okay, yeah,

0:25:32.000 --> 0:25:33.840
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot of noise, there's a lot of fluctuations

0:25:33.840 --> 0:25:38.240
<v Speaker 2>and flukes, but eventually things that work win, right. So

0:25:38.520 --> 0:25:40.680
<v Speaker 2>my favorite example of this is that if you look

0:25:40.720 --> 0:25:42.600
<v Speaker 2>at if you were to take out a human eye

0:25:43.040 --> 0:25:44.600
<v Speaker 2>and you were to look at it and you were

0:25:44.600 --> 0:25:47.320
<v Speaker 2>to compare it next to an octopus's eye, they're actually

0:25:47.400 --> 0:25:50.600
<v Speaker 2>extremely similar, which is bizarre because there's about six hundred

0:25:50.600 --> 0:25:54.560
<v Speaker 2>million years of separate evolutionary pathways for the two branches

0:25:54.600 --> 0:25:57.800
<v Speaker 2>of life. And the reason this happened isn't because you know,

0:25:57.840 --> 0:26:00.760
<v Speaker 2>we just got super lucky. It's because solution came up

0:26:00.800 --> 0:26:04.600
<v Speaker 2>with a strategy by random experimentation that simply worked. It

0:26:04.680 --> 0:26:07.960
<v Speaker 2>made the species navigate the world effectively long enough to

0:26:08.000 --> 0:26:10.680
<v Speaker 2>survive to have offspring, which is the engine of evolution. Right.

0:26:11.040 --> 0:26:13.320
<v Speaker 2>So this is the kind of stuff where yeah, there

0:26:13.359 --> 0:26:15.760
<v Speaker 2>was like a lot of very profound differences. I mean,

0:26:15.760 --> 0:26:17.880
<v Speaker 2>we do not look like octopus, thank goodness, but it's

0:26:17.880 --> 0:26:19.840
<v Speaker 2>something where as a result of that, the I is

0:26:19.880 --> 0:26:23.040
<v Speaker 2>basically the same. And so the question here, I think

0:26:23.200 --> 0:26:26.439
<v Speaker 2>is can we apply these frameworks to our own change,

0:26:26.520 --> 0:26:28.560
<v Speaker 2>right in our own societies? And so what I try

0:26:28.600 --> 0:26:30.560
<v Speaker 2>to say is, Okay, there's some stuff that is ordered.

0:26:30.560 --> 0:26:33.520
<v Speaker 2>There's lots of regularity, there's lots of patterns in our lives.

0:26:33.920 --> 0:26:36.119
<v Speaker 2>That's the convergence stuff. At some point, you know, you

0:26:36.160 --> 0:26:38.639
<v Speaker 2>go on the highway, there might be an accident sometimes,

0:26:38.960 --> 0:26:41.200
<v Speaker 2>but like most of the time, you know, the cars

0:26:41.400 --> 0:26:44.920
<v Speaker 2>drive around the same speed, they have space between them

0:26:44.920 --> 0:26:47.679
<v Speaker 2>that's about the same distance, right, And like there's all

0:26:47.680 --> 0:26:50.000
<v Speaker 2>these patterns, but every so often there's a car accident,

0:26:50.000 --> 0:26:51.760
<v Speaker 2>and that's contingency. Right. So this is the kind of

0:26:51.800 --> 0:26:54.560
<v Speaker 2>stuff where what I say is that the way that

0:26:54.600 --> 0:26:57.800
<v Speaker 2>social change happens and also our lives unfold is what

0:26:57.840 --> 0:27:00.960
<v Speaker 2>I call contingent convergence. Not the most beautiful phrase, but

0:27:01.000 --> 0:27:03.760
<v Speaker 2>it's I think very accurate and saying, okay, so there's

0:27:03.800 --> 0:27:06.840
<v Speaker 2>these contingencies that change the path you're on, and then

0:27:06.880 --> 0:27:10.040
<v Speaker 2>once you're on that path, the sort of forces of

0:27:10.160 --> 0:27:13.320
<v Speaker 2>order do constrain the outcomes that are possible. They say, look,

0:27:13.359 --> 0:27:15.359
<v Speaker 2>this stuff's gonna work. That stuff's not gonna work, and

0:27:15.400 --> 0:27:19.280
<v Speaker 2>the sort of survivors bias produces the stuff that does work.

0:27:19.480 --> 0:27:21.880
<v Speaker 2>So I think this is a useful framework that I'm

0:27:21.920 --> 0:27:26.280
<v Speaker 2>borrowing from evolutionary biology to help us better understand social change.

0:27:26.280 --> 0:27:31.600
<v Speaker 1>So before I get to contingent convergence, I wanna stay

0:27:31.640 --> 0:27:36.320
<v Speaker 1>with the difference between contingents, which is the meteor killing

0:27:36.320 --> 0:27:40.720
<v Speaker 1>the dinosaurs and allowing the mammals derive to rise, and convergence.

0:27:40.960 --> 0:27:43.720
<v Speaker 1>A couple of other examples that you give in the

0:27:43.720 --> 0:27:50.119
<v Speaker 1>Book of Convergence. Crab like bodies keep evolving time and

0:27:50.160 --> 0:27:55.120
<v Speaker 1>again there are five separate instances that that shape somehow

0:27:55.160 --> 0:27:59.960
<v Speaker 1>seems to provide a useful adaptive way to navigating the world.

0:28:00.400 --> 0:28:01.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so this is I mean, this is one of

0:28:01.760 --> 0:28:04.159
<v Speaker 2>those things where evolutionary biologists joke about that and they

0:28:04.200 --> 0:28:06.240
<v Speaker 2>always say, you know, eventually we're gonna have pincers, like

0:28:06.280 --> 0:28:08.960
<v Speaker 2>we're all gonna end up as crabs because like evolution,

0:28:09.119 --> 0:28:11.000
<v Speaker 2>if you know, and some of them say, if there

0:28:11.040 --> 0:28:13.000
<v Speaker 2>is a god, he really likes crabs.

0:28:12.800 --> 0:28:14.919
<v Speaker 1>And this is there is actually I actually heard that

0:28:14.920 --> 0:28:18.800
<v Speaker 1>about beetles, but there's actually a word for this. Carsonization

0:28:19.200 --> 0:28:23.000
<v Speaker 1>is the process of evolving towards a crab like shape.

0:28:23.760 --> 0:28:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Similarly flight. I never thought about this until I read

0:28:27.240 --> 0:28:30.400
<v Speaker 1>it in the book Flight Evolve four separate times. It's insects,

0:28:30.760 --> 0:28:35.280
<v Speaker 1>it's bats, it's birds, and it's terosaurs. That that's amazing.

0:28:35.600 --> 0:28:37.199
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, this is the stuff where you know,

0:28:37.480 --> 0:28:41.400
<v Speaker 2>evolution is the It's a really powerful lesson of the

0:28:41.480 --> 0:28:45.720
<v Speaker 2>value of undirected experimentation because every strange thing that we

0:28:45.760 --> 0:28:48.800
<v Speaker 2>see around us, every you know, organism, every plant, et cetera,

0:28:49.200 --> 0:28:53.160
<v Speaker 2>is just the byproduct of this undirected experimentation navigating uncertainty, right,

0:28:53.160 --> 0:28:54.920
<v Speaker 2>I mean that the world is changing all the time.

0:28:55.120 --> 0:28:57.760
<v Speaker 2>It's different concentrations of oxygen. They sometimes have to be

0:28:57.760 --> 0:28:59.320
<v Speaker 2>in the ocean, sometimes I have to be on land,

0:28:59.680 --> 0:29:02.400
<v Speaker 2>and you know, this sort of diverse array of life

0:29:02.440 --> 0:29:05.440
<v Speaker 2>is just undirected experimentation. But the thing is that these

0:29:05.480 --> 0:29:08.600
<v Speaker 2>do these these forces do end up constraining the possibilities.

0:29:08.600 --> 0:29:11.360
<v Speaker 2>Now when we talk about carsonization, is really interesting thing

0:29:11.360 --> 0:29:12.880
<v Speaker 2>that I don't go into much depth in the book,

0:29:12.880 --> 0:29:14.760
<v Speaker 2>but it's called the Burgess shale up in Canada, and

0:29:14.800 --> 0:29:18.600
<v Speaker 2>the Canadian Rockies, And it's basically like this, this like

0:29:19.120 --> 0:29:22.960
<v Speaker 2>fossilized museum of all these really wild body plans that

0:29:23.080 --> 0:29:25.160
<v Speaker 2>used to exist hundreds of millions of years ago before

0:29:25.160 --> 0:29:28.040
<v Speaker 2>a mass extinction event, and what happened is they all

0:29:28.040 --> 0:29:31.360
<v Speaker 2>got obliterated. So you can't have any sort of convergence

0:29:31.360 --> 0:29:34.120
<v Speaker 2>from those body plans because they don't exist anymore, whereas

0:29:34.120 --> 0:29:37.000
<v Speaker 2>the ones that survived all of us are derived from them. Right,

0:29:37.240 --> 0:29:40.440
<v Speaker 2>So the contingency is like, okay, which body plans exist,

0:29:40.600 --> 0:29:42.560
<v Speaker 2>which which sort of ways could you set up life,

0:29:42.600 --> 0:29:44.719
<v Speaker 2>you know, with spines or not spines, whatever it is.

0:29:45.320 --> 0:29:47.800
<v Speaker 2>And then once you have that contingent event where there's

0:29:47.840 --> 0:29:51.240
<v Speaker 2>the extinction within that, there's this sort of constrained evolution

0:29:51.320 --> 0:29:54.600
<v Speaker 2>that is, okay, well, when this happens, the animal dies,

0:29:54.960 --> 0:29:57.400
<v Speaker 2>so it doesn't exist very long. And when this happens,

0:29:57.400 --> 0:29:59.320
<v Speaker 2>the animal survives, so it does exist. And this is

0:29:59.320 --> 0:30:01.840
<v Speaker 2>where arsonization, you know, you need to have a term

0:30:01.880 --> 0:30:04.400
<v Speaker 2>because the crabs are very much survivors.

0:30:05.720 --> 0:30:07.680
<v Speaker 1>And it turns out that unless you were on the

0:30:07.680 --> 0:30:11.280
<v Speaker 1>other side of the planet from where the meteor hit,

0:30:11.760 --> 0:30:14.920
<v Speaker 1>if you're a borrower, if you get underground, you could

0:30:15.000 --> 0:30:18.960
<v Speaker 1>survive that those fires in that heat and then come

0:30:19.000 --> 0:30:22.200
<v Speaker 1>out and continue the evolutionary process. Yeah.

0:30:22.200 --> 0:30:23.920
<v Speaker 2>I mean, this is the thing I find this really

0:30:24.200 --> 0:30:27.160
<v Speaker 2>fascinating to think about, but also unsettling, is that you know,

0:30:27.360 --> 0:30:30.960
<v Speaker 2>all all the life that exists now is basically offspring

0:30:31.200 --> 0:30:34.040
<v Speaker 2>of either something that could dig when the asteroid hit

0:30:34.440 --> 0:30:36.560
<v Speaker 2>or that lived in the ocean, and that's it, right,

0:30:36.600 --> 0:30:39.720
<v Speaker 2>because everything else died now. The really strange thing to

0:30:39.760 --> 0:30:41.440
<v Speaker 2>think about as well is that, you know, I told

0:30:41.440 --> 0:30:44.120
<v Speaker 2>the story about my great grandfather's first wife, and then

0:30:44.240 --> 0:30:46.520
<v Speaker 2>there's this murder and so on. But you keep tracing

0:30:46.560 --> 0:30:49.479
<v Speaker 2>these things back, right, So my great grandfather's ancestors had

0:30:49.520 --> 0:30:51.440
<v Speaker 2>to meet in just the right way and their great grandfather,

0:30:51.520 --> 0:30:53.320
<v Speaker 2>you know, they had to meet. But you go back

0:30:53.360 --> 0:30:55.840
<v Speaker 2>then six million years, this chimpanzee like creature had to

0:30:55.840 --> 0:30:58.400
<v Speaker 2>meet another chimpanzee like creature, and the two of them

0:30:58.440 --> 0:31:01.280
<v Speaker 2>mating is part of the story of human existence. You

0:31:01.320 --> 0:31:03.440
<v Speaker 2>go back further, you know, there's a worm like creature

0:31:03.520 --> 0:31:06.040
<v Speaker 2>hundreds of millions of years ago, it dies, we probably

0:31:06.040 --> 0:31:08.360
<v Speaker 2>don't exist. Or my favorite example I think in the

0:31:08.360 --> 0:31:11.640
<v Speaker 2>book is, and this is a finding from modern science

0:31:11.640 --> 0:31:14.640
<v Speaker 2>about a year ago, was they found out that the

0:31:14.680 --> 0:31:18.160
<v Speaker 2>reason why mammals don't lay eggs, right, why we don't

0:31:18.200 --> 0:31:21.400
<v Speaker 2>have eggs and we instead have live births, is they believed,

0:31:21.440 --> 0:31:24.760
<v Speaker 2>based on genetic testing, that a single shrew like creature

0:31:24.800 --> 0:31:27.280
<v Speaker 2>got infected by a virus one hundred million years ago,

0:31:27.560 --> 0:31:30.320
<v Speaker 2>which caused a mutation, which led to placenta and the

0:31:30.400 --> 0:31:32.760
<v Speaker 2>rise of mammals. And you think of I mean, to me,

0:31:32.880 --> 0:31:36.280
<v Speaker 2>that is just so utterly bizarre to imagine that our existence,

0:31:36.320 --> 0:31:39.040
<v Speaker 2>like everything in humans, you know, ancient Rome, all this stuff,

0:31:39.040 --> 0:31:41.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, Donald Trump, whatever it is, all of it

0:31:41.080 --> 0:31:43.600
<v Speaker 2>is completely contingent on a shrew like creature one hundred

0:31:43.640 --> 0:31:46.440
<v Speaker 2>million years ago getting sick. He's like, when you think

0:31:46.440 --> 0:31:48.560
<v Speaker 2>about this stuff, I think evolutionary biology tell you know,

0:31:48.560 --> 0:31:51.400
<v Speaker 2>they have encountered black swans throughout hundreds of millions of years.

0:31:51.440 --> 0:31:54.440
<v Speaker 2>It's basically the origin story of complex life.

0:31:54.480 --> 0:31:57.520
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk about one of those black swans and

0:31:58.200 --> 0:32:04.000
<v Speaker 1>the specific concept of contingent convergence. I love the example

0:32:04.080 --> 0:32:08.280
<v Speaker 1>you use of the long term evolution experiment using E

0:32:08.480 --> 0:32:17.479
<v Speaker 1>coli twelve identical flasks of ecoli and in separate separate environment.

0:32:17.640 --> 0:32:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Separate but identical environments run ten million years worth of

0:32:22.720 --> 0:32:25.680
<v Speaker 1>human evolution through it. What's the results of that?

0:32:25.880 --> 0:32:28.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, this one, this one. Making ecoli sexy in a

0:32:28.920 --> 0:32:31.160
<v Speaker 2>book is pretty hard, I must say, but I think

0:32:31.200 --> 0:32:33.600
<v Speaker 2>this is such a powerful lesson for change, so I

0:32:33.880 --> 0:32:35.720
<v Speaker 2>had to include it. I flew out to Michigan State

0:32:36.080 --> 0:32:38.640
<v Speaker 2>to meet with the people running the Long term Evolution Experiment,

0:32:38.680 --> 0:32:41.120
<v Speaker 2>and the simple idea they had, the genius idea, was

0:32:41.120 --> 0:32:44.360
<v Speaker 2>they said, let's see what happens if we take twelve

0:32:44.400 --> 0:32:48.200
<v Speaker 2>identical populations of ecoli, so they're genetically identical, we put

0:32:48.200 --> 0:32:52.160
<v Speaker 2>them in twelve flasks, and we just evolve them for decades. Right,

0:32:52.240 --> 0:32:55.120
<v Speaker 2>And because ecoi life cycles are so short, it's basically

0:32:55.120 --> 0:32:57.440
<v Speaker 2>the equivalent of millions of years of human evolution.

0:32:57.280 --> 0:33:01.080
<v Speaker 1>Like multiple life spans a day exactly, general per day exactly.

0:33:01.120 --> 0:33:02.600
<v Speaker 2>So it's like it's the equivalent of it if you

0:33:02.680 --> 0:33:06.600
<v Speaker 2>went through like great great great grandparents each day. Right now,

0:33:06.640 --> 0:33:08.800
<v Speaker 2>the beauty of the experiment is they controlled everything. So

0:33:08.840 --> 0:33:12.760
<v Speaker 2>there's nothing in these flasks except for a glucose and

0:33:12.840 --> 0:33:16.000
<v Speaker 2>citrate mix because the glucose is food for the ecoi

0:33:16.040 --> 0:33:19.040
<v Speaker 2>and the citrate is like a stabilizer. Okay, now what

0:33:19.160 --> 0:33:22.000
<v Speaker 2>happens is. They figured, okay, let's test contingents to your convergence.

0:33:22.360 --> 0:33:24.320
<v Speaker 2>And for like the first fifteen years or so of

0:33:24.360 --> 0:33:28.160
<v Speaker 2>the experiment, the lesson was, okay, it's it's convergence. Because

0:33:28.280 --> 0:33:31.000
<v Speaker 2>all twelve of the lines were evolving in slightly different ways.

0:33:31.040 --> 0:33:33.360
<v Speaker 2>There's noise, right, there's little differences. The genome is not

0:33:33.360 --> 0:33:37.480
<v Speaker 2>the same. But they're basically all getting fitter at eating glucose,

0:33:37.520 --> 0:33:40.960
<v Speaker 2>so they're getting better at surviving. And then one day

0:33:41.040 --> 0:33:44.200
<v Speaker 2>a researcher comes in and one of the flasks is cloudy,

0:33:44.320 --> 0:33:45.960
<v Speaker 2>and this is not supposed to be the way it is.

0:33:46.000 --> 0:33:47.320
<v Speaker 2>It looks like a little bit of milk has been

0:33:47.400 --> 0:33:50.280
<v Speaker 2>dropped into it instead of this really clear substance that

0:33:50.320 --> 0:33:52.480
<v Speaker 2>the rest of the other eleven are. So they sort

0:33:52.520 --> 0:33:54.360
<v Speaker 2>of think, oh, this is a mistake. Can they throw

0:33:54.360 --> 0:33:57.240
<v Speaker 2>it out? They restart because they frozen the equali so

0:33:57.240 --> 0:33:58.160
<v Speaker 2>they can restart.

0:33:57.920 --> 0:34:01.280
<v Speaker 1>Raise it like the equivalent of every five hundred years. Yeah,

0:34:01.600 --> 0:34:04.080
<v Speaker 1>so they could reset the clock anytime they want, exactly

0:34:04.400 --> 0:34:05.480
<v Speaker 1>twelve flass.

0:34:05.200 --> 0:34:06.960
<v Speaker 2>Yes, so they're all frozen. They all this sort of

0:34:06.960 --> 0:34:09.080
<v Speaker 2>fossil record. They can restart it at any point, So

0:34:09.080 --> 0:34:11.719
<v Speaker 2>they restart the experiment in this flask, just backing up

0:34:11.719 --> 0:34:13.839
<v Speaker 2>a little bit, and about two weeks later, I think

0:34:13.880 --> 0:34:17.319
<v Speaker 2>it is something like that, the flask trends cloudy again,

0:34:17.600 --> 0:34:19.279
<v Speaker 2>and like, okay, this was not an accident. There's something

0:34:19.320 --> 0:34:21.680
<v Speaker 2>going on here. So they actually pay to sequence the genome.

0:34:21.760 --> 0:34:24.319
<v Speaker 2>Very expensive at the time, a lot cheaper today, but

0:34:24.840 --> 0:34:27.960
<v Speaker 2>they paid a sequence it and the amazing finding. And

0:34:28.000 --> 0:34:29.560
<v Speaker 2>this is the thing. When I read this, I was like,

0:34:29.600 --> 0:34:32.960
<v Speaker 2>this is a central way of capturing. My idea is

0:34:33.320 --> 0:34:36.600
<v Speaker 2>that when they looked at the genome, there were four

0:34:36.840 --> 0:34:40.160
<v Speaker 2>totally random mutations that did not matter at all for

0:34:40.280 --> 0:34:44.360
<v Speaker 2>the survivability of the ecoli that proceeded in just the

0:34:44.440 --> 0:34:47.759
<v Speaker 2>right chain. That when the fifth mutation happened, all of

0:34:47.800 --> 0:34:50.799
<v Speaker 2>a sudden, that population could now eat the citrate, which

0:34:50.880 --> 0:34:52.920
<v Speaker 2>was not supposed to happen, right. It was supposed to

0:34:52.920 --> 0:34:55.200
<v Speaker 2>only eat the glucose. The citrate was there as a stabilizer.

0:34:55.719 --> 0:34:58.120
<v Speaker 2>But as a result of this, they became way more fit,

0:34:58.239 --> 0:35:01.279
<v Speaker 2>way more survivable than the other populations because they could

0:35:01.280 --> 0:35:04.399
<v Speaker 2>eat something the others couldn't. Right, And what happened then

0:35:04.480 --> 0:35:06.600
<v Speaker 2>is that since then, this has now been going on

0:35:06.680 --> 0:35:10.240
<v Speaker 2>for twenty plus years or so, since then, the citrate

0:35:10.280 --> 0:35:13.520
<v Speaker 2>population has an advantage over all of the other eleven,

0:35:13.560 --> 0:35:15.600
<v Speaker 2>and none of the others have developed that mutation because

0:35:15.600 --> 0:35:17.040
<v Speaker 2>it's sort of like a house of cards. You had

0:35:17.040 --> 0:35:21.040
<v Speaker 2>to have these exact four accidents in exactly the right order.

0:35:21.080 --> 0:35:22.720
<v Speaker 2>If they'd reach if they changed the order, it once't

0:35:22.680 --> 0:35:24.560
<v Speaker 2>have happened. And then they had to find me. On

0:35:24.600 --> 0:35:26.480
<v Speaker 2>top of that those four accidents, they had to have

0:35:26.520 --> 0:35:28.800
<v Speaker 2>the fifth accident, which gives them the ability to eat sitratee.

0:35:29.200 --> 0:35:31.880
<v Speaker 2>And so this is the idea of contingent convergence. Right.

0:35:31.880 --> 0:35:34.680
<v Speaker 2>It's like for that population that evolved the ability to

0:35:34.719 --> 0:35:39.840
<v Speaker 2>eat sitrade, that one mutation has changed everything forever. It

0:35:39.840 --> 0:35:41.879
<v Speaker 2>will never go back to eating glucose the same way

0:35:41.880 --> 0:35:45.120
<v Speaker 2>as the others. But for the others that didn't develop

0:35:45.200 --> 0:35:48.759
<v Speaker 2>that change, they are all still evolving in relatively predictable ways.

0:35:48.800 --> 0:35:51.960
<v Speaker 2>So I think this is the capturing of the of

0:35:52.000 --> 0:35:54.719
<v Speaker 2>the sort of paradox of our lives is that we

0:35:55.160 --> 0:35:59.120
<v Speaker 2>exist somewhere between order and disorder. Complete disorder would destroy humans,

0:35:59.360 --> 0:36:02.640
<v Speaker 2>we couldn't exist to our society's confunction. Complete order also

0:36:02.680 --> 0:36:05.240
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't work because there'd be no change, there'd be no innovation,

0:36:05.320 --> 0:36:07.080
<v Speaker 2>and so on and so I think this is where

0:36:07.120 --> 0:36:10.120
<v Speaker 2>contingent convergence really really shines. But I will admit that

0:36:10.440 --> 0:36:12.200
<v Speaker 2>trying to do a sound bite version of the long

0:36:12.280 --> 0:36:15.320
<v Speaker 2>term evolution experiment is something that in writing the book

0:36:15.880 --> 0:36:18.800
<v Speaker 2>was probably the greatest challenge of making something about bacteria interesting.

0:36:18.960 --> 0:36:21.319
<v Speaker 1>But it's really fascinating because if you stop and think

0:36:21.360 --> 0:36:24.279
<v Speaker 1>about that, first of all, the genius of doing this

0:36:24.360 --> 0:36:26.799
<v Speaker 1>over twenty years when you have no idea what the

0:36:26.840 --> 0:36:29.560
<v Speaker 1>outcome is, and hey, maybe we're wasting our lives in

0:36:29.600 --> 0:36:32.360
<v Speaker 1>our career doing this number one, but number two, you

0:36:32.400 --> 0:36:35.520
<v Speaker 1>come out and you see that it's cloudy, is it?

0:36:35.680 --> 0:36:39.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm assuming it's cloudy coast. They're reproducing in greater numbers,

0:36:39.719 --> 0:36:43.360
<v Speaker 1>they're processing the citrate, a whole bunch of different stuff

0:36:43.400 --> 0:36:47.600
<v Speaker 1>is going on than the other eleven environments. And one

0:36:47.800 --> 0:36:51.200
<v Speaker 1>has to imagine that if this wasn't taking place in

0:36:51.200 --> 0:36:57.520
<v Speaker 1>an experiment, but this was a big natural scenario, the

0:36:57.560 --> 0:37:02.000
<v Speaker 1>citrate consuming E. Coli would eventually take over the population

0:37:02.080 --> 0:37:05.560
<v Speaker 1>because they have twice as much food available, were more

0:37:06.080 --> 0:37:08.799
<v Speaker 1>than just the plain old glucose eating equal life.

0:37:08.920 --> 0:37:10.359
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and this is I mean when I was talking

0:37:10.440 --> 0:37:12.040
<v Speaker 2>to so one of the one of the researchers named

0:37:12.080 --> 0:37:14.640
<v Speaker 2>Richard Lensky, the other one Zach Blount, and I was

0:37:14.640 --> 0:37:16.640
<v Speaker 2>talking to them about this and they said, look, we

0:37:16.640 --> 0:37:18.919
<v Speaker 2>tried to control everything. We tried to control every single

0:37:18.920 --> 0:37:21.840
<v Speaker 2>you know, you pipett the exact same amount of solution

0:37:21.960 --> 0:37:23.960
<v Speaker 2>into the you know, into the beakers each day and

0:37:24.000 --> 0:37:26.239
<v Speaker 2>so on. But what they said was that, you know,

0:37:26.440 --> 0:37:29.200
<v Speaker 2>well what if one day, you know, when we were

0:37:29.360 --> 0:37:33.240
<v Speaker 2>washing the flask, just a tiny microscopic amount of soap

0:37:33.760 --> 0:37:36.920
<v Speaker 2>stayed on there, right, that could affect the evolution. And

0:37:36.960 --> 0:37:38.920
<v Speaker 2>so there's no I mean, even even in this experiment,

0:37:38.960 --> 0:37:41.080
<v Speaker 2>there's contingency they couldn't control, which is I mean, it's

0:37:41.120 --> 0:37:43.799
<v Speaker 2>the most controlled evolutionary experiment that's ever been done, but

0:37:43.840 --> 0:37:45.600
<v Speaker 2>it's still like, you know, these little tiny bits. If

0:37:45.600 --> 0:37:48.080
<v Speaker 2>you just have you know, a microscopic bit of soap,

0:37:48.400 --> 0:37:50.319
<v Speaker 2>well that's going to kill some of the bacteria, and

0:37:50.360 --> 0:37:53.000
<v Speaker 2>then the evolutionary pathway is going to be slightly changed.

0:37:53.239 --> 0:37:54.880
<v Speaker 2>And I think this is the stuff where, you know,

0:37:55.360 --> 0:37:58.040
<v Speaker 2>had they been a different researcher, had a grant run out,

0:37:58.320 --> 0:38:00.160
<v Speaker 2>they might have just said, okay, we've solved it. It's

0:38:00.160 --> 0:38:02.600
<v Speaker 2>all convergence. Because they could have shut down the experiment

0:38:02.640 --> 0:38:04.880
<v Speaker 2>after fifteen years. So there's just all these things that

0:38:04.880 --> 0:38:06.760
<v Speaker 2>are like layered on top of each other. And I think,

0:38:07.120 --> 0:38:08.960
<v Speaker 2>you know, a lot of scientists, especially in the world

0:38:08.960 --> 0:38:12.680
<v Speaker 2>of evolutionary biology, understands that this is something that we

0:38:13.320 --> 0:38:16.759
<v Speaker 2>really have to take seriously. And I think the way

0:38:16.800 --> 0:38:19.799
<v Speaker 2>that we are set up in human society is to

0:38:19.880 --> 0:38:22.719
<v Speaker 2>ignore the contingency because those are not useful things to

0:38:22.760 --> 0:38:26.360
<v Speaker 2>think about. They're the noise, They're the aberrations of the outliers,

0:38:26.360 --> 0:38:28.400
<v Speaker 2>you know, you delete them from the data whatever. And

0:38:28.440 --> 0:38:30.440
<v Speaker 2>I think this is the kind of stuff where the

0:38:30.560 --> 0:38:32.759
<v Speaker 2>lesson here is that those are actually central to the

0:38:32.840 --> 0:38:34.200
<v Speaker 2>question of how change happens.

0:38:34.760 --> 0:38:37.200
<v Speaker 1>I love this quote from the book. I began to

0:38:37.280 --> 0:38:40.080
<v Speaker 1>wonder whether the history of humanity is just an endless

0:38:40.120 --> 0:38:45.240
<v Speaker 1>but feudal struggle to impose order, certainty, and rationality onto

0:38:45.320 --> 0:38:49.920
<v Speaker 1>a world defined by disorder, chance, and chaos.

0:38:51.080 --> 0:38:52.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I mean, I think this is where I became

0:38:53.080 --> 0:38:55.440
<v Speaker 2>a bit of a disillusioned social scientist, to be honest,

0:38:55.560 --> 0:38:57.880
<v Speaker 2>was that I think that the way that I was

0:38:57.960 --> 0:39:01.600
<v Speaker 2>taught to present change to people was to come up

0:39:01.600 --> 0:39:04.120
<v Speaker 2>with a really elegant model, you know, a really beautiful

0:39:04.160 --> 0:39:08.000
<v Speaker 2>equation and that has statistical significance and has like the

0:39:08.000 --> 0:39:10.759
<v Speaker 2>smallest number of variables possible to explain the entire world.

0:39:11.440 --> 0:39:13.879
<v Speaker 2>And the reason that I ended up, you know, having

0:39:13.960 --> 0:39:16.640
<v Speaker 2>that mentality that I think we're trying to cram complexity

0:39:16.680 --> 0:39:18.720
<v Speaker 2>into these neat and tidy, sort of straight jack models

0:39:18.760 --> 0:39:22.359
<v Speaker 2>is because my PhD dissertation so on, I was looking

0:39:22.400 --> 0:39:25.799
<v Speaker 2>at the origin story of coups and civil wars. That

0:39:25.880 --> 0:39:29.440
<v Speaker 2>was part of my research. And these are black Swan events.

0:39:29.480 --> 0:39:31.640
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you know, there's only a few coup attempts

0:39:31.640 --> 0:39:34.880
<v Speaker 2>that happen every year, and they're so hard to predict.

0:39:35.000 --> 0:39:37.320
<v Speaker 2>I mean because you know, one of the coup plots

0:39:37.360 --> 0:39:40.719
<v Speaker 2>that I studied was where this guy, you know, who's

0:39:40.719 --> 0:39:42.799
<v Speaker 2>a sort of mid level officer in the army, just

0:39:42.840 --> 0:39:44.880
<v Speaker 2>on a whim, decides to try to overthrow the government.

0:39:45.560 --> 0:39:47.840
<v Speaker 2>And he's got like fifty guys in his command. This

0:39:47.920 --> 0:39:51.239
<v Speaker 2>is in nineteen ninety seven in Zambia, and you know,

0:39:51.320 --> 0:39:54.040
<v Speaker 2>his plan is to kidnap the army commander and force

0:39:54.080 --> 0:39:56.000
<v Speaker 2>the army commander to announce the coup on the radio.

0:39:56.040 --> 0:39:57.839
<v Speaker 2>It's not a stupid plan, it's actually it probably would

0:39:57.840 --> 0:40:00.520
<v Speaker 2>have worked, but the group of so soldiers that were

0:40:00.560 --> 0:40:03.279
<v Speaker 2>dispatched to the house. I interviewed some of them when

0:40:03.320 --> 0:40:05.680
<v Speaker 2>I went to Zambia, and they said, look, you know

0:40:05.719 --> 0:40:07.640
<v Speaker 2>we ran in the army commanders in his pajamas. He

0:40:07.680 --> 0:40:09.520
<v Speaker 2>runs out the back because he sees these soldiers coming

0:40:09.520 --> 0:40:12.759
<v Speaker 2>to kidnap him, and he climbs up the compound wall

0:40:13.200 --> 0:40:14.719
<v Speaker 2>and you know, it's like in a film where like

0:40:14.760 --> 0:40:17.600
<v Speaker 2>they grab his pant leg he's pulling up, they're pulling down,

0:40:17.960 --> 0:40:20.560
<v Speaker 2>and they just he slips through their fingers and he

0:40:20.600 --> 0:40:23.680
<v Speaker 2>then goes to the government HQ and announces that there's

0:40:23.680 --> 0:40:25.719
<v Speaker 2>a coup under a coup plot underway, and so the

0:40:25.760 --> 0:40:28.200
<v Speaker 2>soldiers go to the radio station. They capture the coup

0:40:28.280 --> 0:40:31.239
<v Speaker 2>ring leader, who's at this point literally hiding in a

0:40:31.280 --> 0:40:34.279
<v Speaker 2>trash can. Okay, three hours after the coup plot has

0:40:34.719 --> 0:40:36.799
<v Speaker 2>been hashed. Now, the problem is, I was reading all

0:40:36.800 --> 0:40:39.239
<v Speaker 2>this stuff about like Zambia's democracy, and it was oh,

0:40:39.320 --> 0:40:42.200
<v Speaker 2>Zambia is a resilient democracy. It's one of the beacons

0:40:42.200 --> 0:40:44.879
<v Speaker 2>of African democracy in the nineteen nineties. And I'm trying

0:40:44.920 --> 0:40:48.080
<v Speaker 2>to reconcile this with the fact that in my own research,

0:40:48.120 --> 0:40:50.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm finding this story where the soldier says like, yeah,

0:40:50.160 --> 0:40:52.360
<v Speaker 2>I think if I was like one second faster, I

0:40:52.440 --> 0:40:55.640
<v Speaker 2>probably would have gotten the government overthrown. And on top

0:40:55.680 --> 0:40:58.879
<v Speaker 2>of this, the other contingency was they didn't chase him.

0:40:58.880 --> 0:41:00.560
<v Speaker 2>And I said, why didn't you chase them? We said, well,

0:41:01.320 --> 0:41:04.600
<v Speaker 2>the army commander's wife was really attractive and we wanted

0:41:04.600 --> 0:41:06.880
<v Speaker 2>to talk to her. And also we opened the fridge

0:41:07.400 --> 0:41:10.400
<v Speaker 2>and there's Namibian import beer in the fridge and we

0:41:10.480 --> 0:41:12.759
<v Speaker 2>hadn't had Namibian beer for a long time, so we said,

0:41:12.880 --> 0:41:14.920
<v Speaker 2>you know, screw this, We're gonna We're gonna drink some

0:41:14.960 --> 0:41:17.160
<v Speaker 2>beer and talk to the wife. And I'm thinking, you know,

0:41:17.280 --> 0:41:19.200
<v Speaker 2>like like how do I put this in my model?

0:41:19.360 --> 0:41:20.960
<v Speaker 2>Like you know, I mean, like like what is my

0:41:21.040 --> 0:41:23.640
<v Speaker 2>quantitative analysis going to show me about this? And I

0:41:23.640 --> 0:41:27.000
<v Speaker 2>think that's the stuff where those little pivot points and

0:41:27.080 --> 0:41:29.880
<v Speaker 2>studying really rare events that are highly consequential makes you

0:41:29.920 --> 0:41:32.319
<v Speaker 2>think differently about the nature of social change. And I

0:41:32.320 --> 0:41:34.960
<v Speaker 2>would go to these like political science conferences and I

0:41:35.000 --> 0:41:36.920
<v Speaker 2>was just like, I don't I don't believe this is

0:41:36.920 --> 0:41:38.799
<v Speaker 2>how the world works. I think there are times where

0:41:38.800 --> 0:41:41.239
<v Speaker 2>these can be useful models, but I don't think we're

0:41:41.239 --> 0:41:43.640
<v Speaker 2>capturing reality accurately, and that's where, you know, some of

0:41:43.680 --> 0:41:47.040
<v Speaker 2>the origin story professionally of the book comes from you.

0:41:47.000 --> 0:41:50.480
<v Speaker 1>Have to build in attractive women and imported beer exactly

0:41:50.520 --> 0:41:55.360
<v Speaker 1>into your models, or or more accurately, just completely random

0:41:55.400 --> 0:41:59.560
<v Speaker 1>events there. There's a research note in the book from

0:41:59.560 --> 0:42:03.920
<v Speaker 1>an evolutionary biologists seventy eight percent of new species were

0:42:03.960 --> 0:42:09.640
<v Speaker 1>triggered by a single event, typically a random mistake or

0:42:09.680 --> 0:42:10.520
<v Speaker 1>genetic error.

0:42:11.040 --> 0:42:14.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. My favorite example this is something called the bottleneck effect,

0:42:14.280 --> 0:42:16.160
<v Speaker 2>and it's actually I think it's actually an important idea

0:42:16.320 --> 0:42:19.880
<v Speaker 2>for economics as well. So I'll start with the biology.

0:42:19.920 --> 0:42:23.279
<v Speaker 2>The bottleneck is where a population arbitrarily gets reduced to

0:42:23.320 --> 0:42:26.160
<v Speaker 2>a very small number. And the number of people in

0:42:26.200 --> 0:42:27.839
<v Speaker 2>that population could be you know, it could be ten,

0:42:27.880 --> 0:42:30.040
<v Speaker 2>it could be one hundred, whatever it is. But who

0:42:30.080 --> 0:42:33.160
<v Speaker 2>those ten or one hundred people are really really matters.

0:42:33.200 --> 0:42:35.960
<v Speaker 2>So there's one island, for example, where half the population

0:42:36.040 --> 0:42:39.880
<v Speaker 2>as asthma because it was populated initially by this bottleneck

0:42:39.880 --> 0:42:42.319
<v Speaker 2>of a very small number of people who disproportionately had

0:42:42.360 --> 0:42:45.520
<v Speaker 2>more asthma than the rest of the population. There's elephant seals,

0:42:45.520 --> 0:42:48.440
<v Speaker 2>for example, who got whittled down through hunting and so

0:42:48.480 --> 0:42:51.440
<v Speaker 2>on to something like I think it's fifty breeding pairs

0:42:51.480 --> 0:42:54.880
<v Speaker 2>or something like that, but which exact seals lived or

0:42:54.920 --> 0:42:58.319
<v Speaker 2>died completely changed the trajectory of that species. Now, I

0:42:58.360 --> 0:43:01.719
<v Speaker 2>sort of say this because human society has had bottlenecks

0:43:01.680 --> 0:43:04.160
<v Speaker 2>at various times. We don't know exactly how small they've been,

0:43:04.160 --> 0:43:07.480
<v Speaker 2>but the hypothesis is perhaps that it may have been

0:43:07.520 --> 0:43:10.239
<v Speaker 2>as few as a few thousand humans at one point,

0:43:10.480 --> 0:43:14.000
<v Speaker 2>and which humans were in that group that determined everything

0:43:14.040 --> 0:43:16.799
<v Speaker 2>for who's allowed now, right, So if you swap out,

0:43:16.840 --> 0:43:19.439
<v Speaker 2>you know, one person for a different person, you've changed

0:43:19.440 --> 0:43:20.719
<v Speaker 2>the trajectory of the species.

0:43:20.920 --> 0:43:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Now.

0:43:21.040 --> 0:43:23.680
<v Speaker 2>I think this is also true when you think about economics,

0:43:23.680 --> 0:43:26.640
<v Speaker 2>you think about innovation. Every so often shocks go through

0:43:26.640 --> 0:43:30.520
<v Speaker 2>industries and they whittle down the competition, and who survives

0:43:30.560 --> 0:43:33.120
<v Speaker 2>in that moment is potentially somewhat arbitrary. It could be

0:43:33.120 --> 0:43:35.520
<v Speaker 2>based on some pressures, it could be a smart CEO,

0:43:35.640 --> 0:43:39.160
<v Speaker 2>whatever it is, But the sort of survivors in that bottleneck,

0:43:39.440 --> 0:43:41.840
<v Speaker 2>then we'll dictate how the industry might unfold in the future.

0:43:41.840 --> 0:43:44.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you know, Apple has this outsized effect on

0:43:44.200 --> 0:43:46.960
<v Speaker 2>the tech industry, but you know, maybe the time means

0:43:46.960 --> 0:43:48.440
<v Speaker 2>a little bit different in Apple dice.

0:43:48.760 --> 0:43:51.399
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's not implausible, but for Microsoft giving them

0:43:51.400 --> 0:43:54.440
<v Speaker 1>alone and what was it ninety eight eighty, but for

0:43:55.040 --> 0:43:58.520
<v Speaker 1>any trust case which gave Microsoft an incentive to have

0:43:58.600 --> 0:44:01.040
<v Speaker 1>another survival ble operating system.

0:44:01.080 --> 0:44:02.799
<v Speaker 2>Who knows. Yeah, And so this you know, when you

0:44:02.800 --> 0:44:05.480
<v Speaker 2>think about I think bottlenecks are a useful way of

0:44:05.480 --> 0:44:08.880
<v Speaker 2>thinking about this, partly because they affect trajectories very very profoundly,

0:44:09.360 --> 0:44:11.520
<v Speaker 2>but also because they can be arbitrary. And I think

0:44:11.560 --> 0:44:14.800
<v Speaker 2>this is something where what we do in human society

0:44:14.880 --> 0:44:17.359
<v Speaker 2>is we write history backwards, so we look at who

0:44:17.440 --> 0:44:19.840
<v Speaker 2>is successful and we say, I mean hindsight bias. You

0:44:19.840 --> 0:44:21.360
<v Speaker 2>know many people, I'm sure I've talked to you about this,

0:44:21.400 --> 0:44:24.759
<v Speaker 2>but it's very important to underline that, like when these

0:44:24.840 --> 0:44:28.719
<v Speaker 2>arbitrary things happen, if you then infer causality, that's a

0:44:28.760 --> 0:44:32.360
<v Speaker 2>neat and tidy story, you actually are learning exactly the

0:44:32.400 --> 0:44:35.680
<v Speaker 2>wrong lesson. I mean, the reason these particular elephant seals

0:44:35.680 --> 0:44:38.400
<v Speaker 2>survived is probably arbitrary. It just happened to depend on

0:44:38.440 --> 0:44:42.160
<v Speaker 2>who the people who are proaching them, you know, happen

0:44:42.239 --> 0:44:45.040
<v Speaker 2>to stumble upon. And then of course the evolutionary history

0:44:45.040 --> 0:44:48.000
<v Speaker 2>of that animal is completely changed. So I think that

0:44:48.560 --> 0:44:50.799
<v Speaker 2>lesson is that, you know, sometimes when bottlenecks happen, it

0:44:50.840 --> 0:44:53.319
<v Speaker 2>reshapes the trajectory of the future, but it also is

0:44:54.400 --> 0:44:58.120
<v Speaker 2>inescapably arbitrary at times, and we don't like that. I mean,

0:44:58.160 --> 0:45:00.480
<v Speaker 2>the entire world of self help and the entire world

0:45:00.560 --> 0:45:05.080
<v Speaker 2>of sort of business advice is, oh, these people were successful,

0:45:05.120 --> 0:45:07.640
<v Speaker 2>here's how you replicate it. And the replication is always

0:45:07.920 --> 0:45:09.600
<v Speaker 2>just do what they did, right. But I mean, of

0:45:09.600 --> 0:45:11.239
<v Speaker 2>course the world's different now. I mean, if you do

0:45:11.360 --> 0:45:14.239
<v Speaker 2>what they did, you're just making something that's not truly innovative. Right.

0:45:14.280 --> 0:45:19.040
<v Speaker 1>You can't invent an iPhone today exactly. So it's fascinating

0:45:19.040 --> 0:45:21.759
<v Speaker 1>when you talk about bottlenecks. I read a book some

0:45:21.880 --> 0:45:25.440
<v Speaker 1>years ago called Last Ape stand In, and it talks

0:45:25.480 --> 0:45:31.719
<v Speaker 1>about all the various proto human species, from Chromagnum to

0:45:31.760 --> 0:45:36.799
<v Speaker 1>Neanderthal to Homo sapiens. And the theory is that in

0:45:36.840 --> 0:45:40.680
<v Speaker 1>the last ice Age, maybe it's twenty or forty thousand

0:45:40.800 --> 0:45:44.640
<v Speaker 1>years ago, we were down to a few thousand humans.

0:45:46.160 --> 0:45:50.680
<v Speaker 1>But for the Ice Age ending when it did another

0:45:50.760 --> 0:45:54.279
<v Speaker 1>year again, we may not be having this conversation. There

0:45:54.280 --> 0:45:55.440
<v Speaker 1>may be no humans around.

0:45:55.719 --> 0:45:57.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean this is the This is the stuff

0:45:57.800 --> 0:46:00.600
<v Speaker 2>also where I think that the sort of predictable patterns

0:46:00.600 --> 0:46:03.560
<v Speaker 2>that people try to impose on the world are also

0:46:03.840 --> 0:46:07.880
<v Speaker 2>subject to whims of timing. Right, And your example is

0:46:08.280 --> 0:46:10.600
<v Speaker 2>completely apt, and I think it's a very important one.

0:46:10.640 --> 0:46:12.399
<v Speaker 2>And I think it also speaks to the question when

0:46:12.440 --> 0:46:14.240
<v Speaker 2>you say when the ice age ends, right, the timing

0:46:14.280 --> 0:46:17.640
<v Speaker 2>issue is so important. Now, one of my you know,

0:46:17.719 --> 0:46:19.960
<v Speaker 2>examples of this that I think is so fascinating is

0:46:20.440 --> 0:46:23.400
<v Speaker 2>you think about, like our daily lives, and our daily

0:46:23.440 --> 0:46:27.160
<v Speaker 2>lives are you know, basically set up in groups of seven. Okay,

0:46:27.239 --> 0:46:29.239
<v Speaker 2>we've got a seven day week. Why is that? So

0:46:29.280 --> 0:46:32.360
<v Speaker 2>I start looking into this and effectively what happens is

0:46:32.400 --> 0:46:35.920
<v Speaker 2>there's this period in ancient Rome where they have this

0:46:36.000 --> 0:46:38.960
<v Speaker 2>superstition that says the planets are really important for being

0:46:39.000 --> 0:46:41.760
<v Speaker 2>you know, auspicious and so on, and they can see

0:46:41.800 --> 0:46:44.640
<v Speaker 2>because they don't have telescopes, five planets with the naked

0:46:44.680 --> 0:46:47.160
<v Speaker 2>eye and the Sun and the moon. You add them up,

0:46:47.239 --> 0:46:49.799
<v Speaker 2>that's seven. They set up a seven day week because

0:46:49.800 --> 0:46:51.800
<v Speaker 2>of that. That's why we divide our lives in seven.

0:46:52.080 --> 0:46:53.960
<v Speaker 2>And it's because of this lock, this this this thing

0:46:53.960 --> 0:46:55.440
<v Speaker 2>that I also talk about in Fluke, which is this

0:46:55.480 --> 0:46:58.120
<v Speaker 2>concept of lock in where an arbitrary thing can happen

0:46:58.440 --> 0:47:00.960
<v Speaker 2>and then sometimes it persists and sometimes it doesn't, and

0:47:00.960 --> 0:47:03.719
<v Speaker 2>that's often very random. So my other example of this

0:47:03.880 --> 0:47:06.680
<v Speaker 2>is everything that we write, everything that we say, is

0:47:06.680 --> 0:47:09.240
<v Speaker 2>derived from English being locked in when the printing press

0:47:09.320 --> 0:47:11.960
<v Speaker 2>was invented. If the printing press had been invented, you know,

0:47:12.040 --> 0:47:14.200
<v Speaker 2>six decades earlier, six decades later, there'd be a different

0:47:14.239 --> 0:47:16.560
<v Speaker 2>language because the language was in flux, and all of

0:47:16.560 --> 0:47:19.400
<v Speaker 2>a sudden it became really important to have a standardized system.

0:47:19.600 --> 0:47:20.839
<v Speaker 2>So a lot of people used to write the word

0:47:20.920 --> 0:47:25.719
<v Speaker 2>had hadd Now that was expensive because they figured, okay,

0:47:25.719 --> 0:47:27.600
<v Speaker 2>we've got a typeset this with a bunch of letters.

0:47:27.680 --> 0:47:29.880
<v Speaker 2>Why don't we just do had and I'll boom, all

0:47:29.920 --> 0:47:32.120
<v Speaker 2>of a sudden the language changes. Right, So there's a

0:47:32.200 --> 0:47:34.319
<v Speaker 2>series of things that happen really really quickly, but they

0:47:34.320 --> 0:47:36.879
<v Speaker 2>basically produce modern English. And so I think this sort

0:47:36.920 --> 0:47:40.319
<v Speaker 2>of concept of the arbitrary experimentation and you know, superstition

0:47:40.360 --> 0:47:42.560
<v Speaker 2>of the Romans and then getting locked in and the

0:47:42.560 --> 0:47:44.520
<v Speaker 2>empire sort of sets it up and then it spreads

0:47:44.520 --> 0:47:46.279
<v Speaker 2>and all that, and then you think, okay, why do

0:47:46.280 --> 0:47:47.640
<v Speaker 2>we have a five day working way. I mean, it's

0:47:47.640 --> 0:47:51.759
<v Speaker 2>partly tied to, you know, this superstition about the auspicious

0:47:51.840 --> 0:47:55.240
<v Speaker 2>nature of the visible planets, which themselves are an arbitrary

0:47:55.239 --> 0:47:57.719
<v Speaker 2>byproduct of how our eyes evolved. So I mean, it's

0:47:57.760 --> 0:47:59.680
<v Speaker 2>just sort of an everything you think about has got

0:47:59.680 --> 0:48:02.200
<v Speaker 2>these sort of tentacles where they could have been slightly

0:48:02.239 --> 0:48:04.760
<v Speaker 2>different and then our lives would be radically changed.

0:48:05.120 --> 0:48:07.759
<v Speaker 1>One of the things that's so fascinating with us as

0:48:08.120 --> 0:48:11.920
<v Speaker 1>narrative storytellers, Right, we think about, Okay, we've had the

0:48:11.960 --> 0:48:16.080
<v Speaker 1>spoken language for tens of thousands of years, maybe one

0:48:16.160 --> 0:48:19.440
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand years, and we think about the cuneiform and

0:48:19.480 --> 0:48:23.120
<v Speaker 1>the written language going back to the Egyptians and the Greeks.

0:48:23.719 --> 0:48:28.760
<v Speaker 1>But that's history, and ninety nine percent of the people

0:48:28.800 --> 0:48:34.520
<v Speaker 1>who lived during that period were illiterate. In fact, species

0:48:34.560 --> 0:48:38.279
<v Speaker 1>wide literacy, which we arguably still don't have but are

0:48:38.320 --> 0:48:41.920
<v Speaker 1>closer to. This is like a century old, like for

0:48:41.960 --> 0:48:46.120
<v Speaker 1>a hundred years people could read and write and meaning

0:48:46.200 --> 0:48:50.160
<v Speaker 1>most people, but go back beyond the century, and the

0:48:50.320 --> 0:48:54.120
<v Speaker 1>vast majority of people either couldn't read, couldn't write, never

0:48:54.160 --> 0:48:57.000
<v Speaker 1>went to school. They had to get up and work

0:48:57.040 --> 0:48:59.520
<v Speaker 1>in the land. They didn't have time to mess around

0:48:59.520 --> 0:49:00.680
<v Speaker 1>with this stuff.

0:49:01.440 --> 0:49:03.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you know, I think there's a lot of things

0:49:03.600 --> 0:49:06.680
<v Speaker 2>where we are blinded to the fact that we have

0:49:07.000 --> 0:49:09.600
<v Speaker 2>lives that are unlike any humans who have come before us, right,

0:49:10.040 --> 0:49:12.640
<v Speaker 2>And I think there's some really big superstructure events that

0:49:12.719 --> 0:49:15.200
<v Speaker 2>are related to this that that really do affect our lives.

0:49:15.239 --> 0:49:18.440
<v Speaker 2>So my favorite way of thinking about this is that

0:49:18.520 --> 0:49:21.400
<v Speaker 2>I think that every human who came before the modern period,

0:49:21.440 --> 0:49:23.239
<v Speaker 2>most you know, at least you know, maybe the last

0:49:23.239 --> 0:49:26.320
<v Speaker 2>two hundred years or so, what they experienced was uncertainty

0:49:26.360 --> 0:49:28.560
<v Speaker 2>in their day to day life. There was almost no regularity,

0:49:28.600 --> 0:49:30.160
<v Speaker 2>no patterns in their day to day life. They didn't

0:49:30.160 --> 0:49:31.880
<v Speaker 2>know where their next meal would come from. They didn't know,

0:49:32.200 --> 0:49:33.920
<v Speaker 2>you know, whether they would get eaten by an animal,

0:49:34.239 --> 0:49:36.440
<v Speaker 2>et cetera, the crops might fail, you know, et cetera.

0:49:37.200 --> 0:49:39.719
<v Speaker 2>But they had what I call global stability, which is

0:49:39.760 --> 0:49:41.719
<v Speaker 2>to say, like the parents and the children lived in

0:49:41.719 --> 0:49:43.319
<v Speaker 2>the same kind of world. You're a hunter gather, your

0:49:43.400 --> 0:49:45.719
<v Speaker 2>kids a hunter gather, you know, And this means that

0:49:45.719 --> 0:49:48.520
<v Speaker 2>the parents teach the kids how to use technology. There's

0:49:48.560 --> 0:49:51.319
<v Speaker 2>basically regularity from generation to generation.

0:49:51.080 --> 0:49:52.040
<v Speaker 1>For thousands of years.

0:49:52.120 --> 0:49:54.279
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we have flipped that right. So what we have

0:49:54.440 --> 0:49:57.960
<v Speaker 2>is local stability and global instability. So we have extreme

0:49:58.040 --> 0:50:01.000
<v Speaker 2>regularity like no human has ever experienced before, where we

0:50:01.040 --> 0:50:03.640
<v Speaker 2>can know to almost the minute when something we order

0:50:03.680 --> 0:50:05.359
<v Speaker 2>off the internet is going to arrive at our house,

0:50:05.920 --> 0:50:07.800
<v Speaker 2>and we go to Starbucks anywhere in the world and

0:50:07.840 --> 0:50:09.120
<v Speaker 2>we can have the same drink and it's going to

0:50:09.120 --> 0:50:11.239
<v Speaker 2>taste basically the same thing, and we're really angry if

0:50:11.280 --> 0:50:13.879
<v Speaker 2>somebody messes up, you know, in order, because that that

0:50:14.040 --> 0:50:17.840
<v Speaker 2>expectation of regularity is so high. But we have global instability.

0:50:17.880 --> 0:50:19.200
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you know, I grew up in a world

0:50:19.200 --> 0:50:22.239
<v Speaker 2>where the Internet didn't exist really for ordinary people, and

0:50:22.280 --> 0:50:24.840
<v Speaker 2>now it's impossible to live without it. You know. You

0:50:24.840 --> 0:50:26.960
<v Speaker 2>think about the ways that children teach parents how to

0:50:27.040 --> 0:50:29.920
<v Speaker 2>use technology that's never been possible before. And on top

0:50:29.960 --> 0:50:31.680
<v Speaker 2>of this, you have the sort of AI you know,

0:50:32.640 --> 0:50:35.360
<v Speaker 2>rise where the world's going to profoundly change in a

0:50:35.400 --> 0:50:39.319
<v Speaker 2>very short period of time. There has never been a

0:50:39.360 --> 0:50:43.640
<v Speaker 2>generation of our species. We're not just the global dynamics

0:50:43.640 --> 0:50:47.480
<v Speaker 2>have changed generation to generation, but within generations. I mean,

0:50:47.480 --> 0:50:49.600
<v Speaker 2>we're going to live in a world where, you know,

0:50:49.680 --> 0:50:53.080
<v Speaker 2>the way that we understand and navigate systems and our

0:50:53.120 --> 0:50:56.160
<v Speaker 2>lives is going to change multiple times in one lifetime.

0:50:56.520 --> 0:50:59.120
<v Speaker 2>And you think about you know, Hunter gathers that the

0:50:59.320 --> 0:51:02.799
<v Speaker 2>average human generations about twenty six point nine years. In

0:51:02.840 --> 0:51:05.279
<v Speaker 2>the long stretch of our species, you can go twenty

0:51:05.280 --> 0:51:07.960
<v Speaker 2>seven years over and over and over. It's pretty much

0:51:07.960 --> 0:51:10.680
<v Speaker 2>the same world for pretty much the entirety of our

0:51:10.719 --> 0:51:12.719
<v Speaker 2>species until I would say the last you know, maybe

0:51:12.719 --> 0:51:14.759
<v Speaker 2>one hundred years or so. And that's the thing, you know,

0:51:15.400 --> 0:51:17.080
<v Speaker 2>you think about this. The more you think about this,

0:51:17.160 --> 0:51:18.839
<v Speaker 2>the more of these examples you find. I mean, one

0:51:18.880 --> 0:51:20.560
<v Speaker 2>of them is, you know, jet leg I flew in

0:51:20.600 --> 0:51:23.560
<v Speaker 2>from London and there's been three generations of people who

0:51:23.600 --> 0:51:26.600
<v Speaker 2>could ever move fast enough to knock out their biology

0:51:26.600 --> 0:51:28.680
<v Speaker 2>in a way that they have jet legs. So, I mean,

0:51:28.680 --> 0:51:31.640
<v Speaker 2>there's just a million things that we experience as routine

0:51:32.080 --> 0:51:33.879
<v Speaker 2>that no humans before us have ever brought.

0:51:34.040 --> 0:51:38.000
<v Speaker 1>You can never outrun your circadian rhythms until you could

0:51:38.239 --> 0:51:41.080
<v Speaker 1>travel at a few hundred miles an hour and go

0:51:41.120 --> 0:51:44.920
<v Speaker 1>from from country to country change You couldn't even change

0:51:44.960 --> 0:51:48.239
<v Speaker 1>time zones until what is it, seventy five years ago.

0:51:48.560 --> 0:51:51.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, there's an amazing map. I don't know

0:51:51.239 --> 0:51:53.799
<v Speaker 2>the exact name of it. I think it's an isochrome

0:51:53.800 --> 0:51:55.920
<v Speaker 2>map or something like that, but it's a map of

0:51:55.960 --> 0:51:59.680
<v Speaker 2>London from one hundred plus years ago, and it's showing

0:51:59.719 --> 0:52:02.200
<v Speaker 2>the war based on how long it takes you to

0:52:02.239 --> 0:52:06.080
<v Speaker 2>get anywhere. And you see that like western Europe is

0:52:06.280 --> 0:52:08.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, the closest, and it's like five plus days

0:52:08.719 --> 0:52:11.920
<v Speaker 2>or whatever. Right now, somebody made a renewed version of

0:52:11.920 --> 0:52:14.360
<v Speaker 2>that map a couple of years ago, and the furthest

0:52:14.400 --> 0:52:16.400
<v Speaker 2>reach you can go is like thirty six plus hours,

0:52:16.400 --> 0:52:19.160
<v Speaker 2>where in the old map it was like three plus months.

0:52:19.760 --> 0:52:21.520
<v Speaker 2>And you know that's the stuff as well, where we

0:52:21.920 --> 0:52:23.880
<v Speaker 2>just we've sped up the world so much. And I

0:52:23.920 --> 0:52:26.480
<v Speaker 2>think this is embedded a lot of the dynamics where

0:52:26.520 --> 0:52:29.600
<v Speaker 2>flukes and sort of chance events become more common.

0:52:29.520 --> 0:52:31.839
<v Speaker 1>Thirty six hours. I think you get to the moon

0:52:31.880 --> 0:52:34.520
<v Speaker 1>in thirty six hours, right, It's true, And that's how

0:52:34.600 --> 0:52:37.279
<v Speaker 1>much it's changed. Yeah, So let's let's play a little

0:52:37.280 --> 0:52:41.920
<v Speaker 1>bit of a game called convergence or contingency. We talked

0:52:41.960 --> 0:52:48.640
<v Speaker 1>before about sometimes hey, multiple evolutionary paths lead to flight

0:52:49.120 --> 0:52:52.520
<v Speaker 1>in very different ways, and sometimes it's just a random

0:52:52.719 --> 0:52:56.560
<v Speaker 1>meteor wiping out the dinosaurs. So once convergence. The other

0:52:56.760 --> 0:53:00.840
<v Speaker 1>is contingency. And since you're in from London, Brexit was

0:53:00.880 --> 0:53:04.239
<v Speaker 1>that a function of random elements or was that a

0:53:04.280 --> 0:53:06.440
<v Speaker 1>convergence that was a long time in the make.

0:53:07.040 --> 0:53:09.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, like most things, is both. I mean, I think

0:53:09.040 --> 0:53:11.040
<v Speaker 2>there are factors around the Brexit vote that could have

0:53:11.160 --> 0:53:13.200
<v Speaker 2>very quick clearly gone the other way. I mean, there

0:53:13.239 --> 0:53:15.720
<v Speaker 2>are the timing of the vote could have been different,

0:53:16.520 --> 0:53:18.920
<v Speaker 2>the ways that the polls were presented could have been different.

0:53:19.600 --> 0:53:22.279
<v Speaker 2>And also I think some of the dynamics of how

0:53:22.280 --> 0:53:25.200
<v Speaker 2>the EU behave could have been slightly different. So I mean, yeah,

0:53:25.560 --> 0:53:30.040
<v Speaker 2>anytime you have a close outcome, it produces you know,

0:53:30.080 --> 0:53:32.160
<v Speaker 2>I think contingency where it could have it could have

0:53:32.360 --> 0:53:34.920
<v Speaker 2>gone the other way. But there are trends as well, right,

0:53:34.960 --> 0:53:37.960
<v Speaker 2>I mean, there's these are the things where I'm even

0:53:38.000 --> 0:53:41.360
<v Speaker 2>though I believe that Flukes changed the world profoundly regularly,

0:53:41.840 --> 0:53:44.960
<v Speaker 2>I also completely accept the idea that there are sort

0:53:44.960 --> 0:53:47.960
<v Speaker 2>of long term forces that yield something like Brexit. And

0:53:48.000 --> 0:53:51.360
<v Speaker 2>there was a long sort of bubbling antagonism to immigration

0:53:51.520 --> 0:53:54.120
<v Speaker 2>levels and anger at Brussels and all these sorts of

0:53:54.160 --> 0:53:57.640
<v Speaker 2>things which politicians capitalized on and leads to Brexit. I mean,

0:53:57.680 --> 0:54:00.239
<v Speaker 2>I think one of the things that will be interesten

0:54:00.280 --> 0:54:03.759
<v Speaker 2>about this, and perhaps the biggest convergence, is the conversation

0:54:03.840 --> 0:54:07.000
<v Speaker 2>which David Cameron decided to hold the referendum. That would

0:54:07.000 --> 0:54:10.040
<v Speaker 2>be the biggest con contingency for me because he thought,

0:54:11.160 --> 0:54:13.359
<v Speaker 2>at least as has been reported, he thought that he

0:54:13.400 --> 0:54:15.400
<v Speaker 2>was going to put to bed the challenge from the

0:54:15.440 --> 0:54:18.279
<v Speaker 2>right in the Conservative Party by holding the referendum, that

0:54:18.320 --> 0:54:19.800
<v Speaker 2>he would win and that he would have to stop

0:54:19.800 --> 0:54:22.880
<v Speaker 2>dealing with questions about Brexit, and of course it backfired

0:54:22.920 --> 0:54:25.160
<v Speaker 2>on him. He didn't really believe in Brexit, but he

0:54:25.200 --> 0:54:28.120
<v Speaker 2>figured this was a political ploy that would know basically

0:54:28.560 --> 0:54:31.680
<v Speaker 2>cut off the pivot to the right. So that's one

0:54:31.719 --> 0:54:33.120
<v Speaker 2>of those things where you know, if a different set

0:54:33.160 --> 0:54:34.799
<v Speaker 2>of people had been in the room with Cameron, then

0:54:35.239 --> 0:54:37.160
<v Speaker 2>maybe they don't hold a referendum, and then that's a

0:54:37.239 --> 0:54:38.279
<v Speaker 2>very different world we live in.

0:54:38.360 --> 0:54:41.040
<v Speaker 1>Huh. So you're over in the UK looking at the

0:54:41.200 --> 0:54:46.240
<v Speaker 1>United States as a political science, the election of Donald

0:54:46.280 --> 0:54:50.959
<v Speaker 1>Trump in twenty sixteen by forty or fifty thousand votes

0:54:51.000 --> 0:54:55.120
<v Speaker 1>in a handful of swing states. Fascinating question was that

0:54:55.680 --> 0:54:59.960
<v Speaker 1>a random contingency or was the convergence and the art

0:55:00.080 --> 0:55:04.360
<v Speaker 1>ark of history moving towards a populist in the United States.

0:55:04.680 --> 0:55:07.839
<v Speaker 2>Yes, so there's sort of precursor factors that Trump tacked

0:55:07.840 --> 0:55:09.440
<v Speaker 2>into and this is the convergence, right, this is the

0:55:09.440 --> 0:55:11.840
<v Speaker 2>stuff that's the trends. I do think there's some pretty

0:55:11.840 --> 0:55:14.520
<v Speaker 2>big contingencies around Trump. I mean, there's there's one hypothesis

0:55:14.520 --> 0:55:16.479
<v Speaker 2>which I you know, I can't I don't know Donald

0:55:16.480 --> 0:55:19.520
<v Speaker 2>Trump's thinking, but there's speculation by people who are close

0:55:19.560 --> 0:55:22.040
<v Speaker 2>to him that the moment he decided he would definitely

0:55:22.120 --> 0:55:24.640
<v Speaker 2>run for the twenty sixteen race was in twenty eleven

0:55:24.719 --> 0:55:27.000
<v Speaker 2>when there was the White House Correspondence dinner and he

0:55:27.160 --> 0:55:30.120
<v Speaker 2>was exactly and he was publicly humiliated by Barack Obama

0:55:30.160 --> 0:55:33.080
<v Speaker 2>with a joke that basically said something to the effect of,

0:55:33.520 --> 0:55:36.000
<v Speaker 2>I really sympathize with you, Donald because I couldn't handle

0:55:36.040 --> 0:55:38.560
<v Speaker 2>the hard choices that you have to make on Celebrity Apprentice,

0:55:38.840 --> 0:55:40.800
<v Speaker 2>whereas I, you know, have to make the easy choices

0:55:40.800 --> 0:55:43.000
<v Speaker 2>in the situation room. And everyone's sort of laughing at

0:55:43.000 --> 0:55:45.480
<v Speaker 2>Donald Trump and so on. And the question is, you know,

0:55:45.520 --> 0:55:47.560
<v Speaker 2>if the joke writer had not come up with that

0:55:47.600 --> 0:55:50.239
<v Speaker 2>idea or Obama said at let's just can that joke.

0:55:50.640 --> 0:55:53.879
<v Speaker 2>Does Trump run? I mean, that's question one. Then there's

0:55:53.880 --> 0:55:56.800
<v Speaker 2>the questions around the election, right, And this is something where,

0:55:57.600 --> 0:56:00.480
<v Speaker 2>you know, without going into too much detail, the reopening

0:56:00.520 --> 0:56:03.080
<v Speaker 2>of the FBI investigation, which happens because of a congressman

0:56:03.120 --> 0:56:05.960
<v Speaker 2>in New York and his inability to sort of control himself.

0:56:06.120 --> 0:56:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Right, you know that send naked genital pictures to underage women.

0:56:11.239 --> 0:56:12.759
<v Speaker 2>Thank you for saying it for me. So there's a

0:56:12.840 --> 0:56:15.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, this is the thing where this causes the

0:56:15.080 --> 0:56:17.440
<v Speaker 2>reopening the FBI investigation. Did this cause a shift in

0:56:17.520 --> 0:56:19.960
<v Speaker 2>votes in those three critical states? I don't know, but possibly,

0:56:20.040 --> 0:56:22.640
<v Speaker 2>right could be. And on top of that, you have

0:56:23.560 --> 0:56:25.000
<v Speaker 2>one of my things that I do talk about in

0:56:25.000 --> 0:56:27.440
<v Speaker 2>the book. I have a chapter on called the Lottery

0:56:27.440 --> 0:56:30.279
<v Speaker 2>of Earth. And this is the strangest example of US

0:56:30.280 --> 0:56:33.360
<v Speaker 2>politics with a fluke. Around the time of the dinosaurs,

0:56:33.360 --> 0:56:35.840
<v Speaker 2>there was an ancient inland sea in America and it

0:56:35.920 --> 0:56:37.799
<v Speaker 2>basically had a coastline that would if you were going

0:56:37.800 --> 0:56:39.319
<v Speaker 2>to chart it today, it would be like a little

0:56:39.320 --> 0:56:43.000
<v Speaker 2>crescent shape, a sort of swoop across Mississippi, Alabama, and Georgia.

0:56:43.680 --> 0:56:46.240
<v Speaker 2>Now what happens is on the coastline there's these fital

0:56:46.280 --> 0:56:50.239
<v Speaker 2>plankton that live in this shallow sea and when they die,

0:56:50.360 --> 0:56:52.920
<v Speaker 2>their bodies eventually get turned into these really, really rich

0:56:52.960 --> 0:56:55.120
<v Speaker 2>soils when the sea ends. Now, I promise this makes

0:56:55.120 --> 0:56:59.160
<v Speaker 2>sense for how it links to Trump. This produces extremely

0:56:59.200 --> 0:57:01.439
<v Speaker 2>fertile soil and what's called the Black Belt. And when

0:57:01.680 --> 0:57:06.239
<v Speaker 2>slavery was developed, the plantations are. You can map them

0:57:06.520 --> 0:57:09.160
<v Speaker 2>exactly where the ancient in lan Sea was. That's where

0:57:09.160 --> 0:57:11.520
<v Speaker 2>they go. So this means that there's all these enslaved

0:57:11.560 --> 0:57:13.759
<v Speaker 2>people brought to the southern United States according to this

0:57:13.800 --> 0:57:17.160
<v Speaker 2>ancient coastline, and a lot of the people who were

0:57:17.360 --> 0:57:20.600
<v Speaker 2>freed then settled there. And so the demographics of those

0:57:21.040 --> 0:57:24.280
<v Speaker 2>counties are overwhelming the African American And when you look

0:57:24.280 --> 0:57:27.000
<v Speaker 2>at the election results for the twenty twenty election, where

0:57:27.040 --> 0:57:29.479
<v Speaker 2>Georgia becomes this pivotal state and also is the reason

0:57:29.520 --> 0:57:32.200
<v Speaker 2>why the Democrats hold onto the Senate, if you map

0:57:32.240 --> 0:57:35.200
<v Speaker 2>the county level election results, you will see the swoop

0:57:35.560 --> 0:57:38.240
<v Speaker 2>of the ancient inlan Sea and it's exactly where the

0:57:38.240 --> 0:57:41.120
<v Speaker 2>Democrats carried the state because it's where the black population,

0:57:41.160 --> 0:57:44.840
<v Speaker 2>which is disproportionately likely to vote for Democrats, lives. And

0:57:44.880 --> 0:57:46.120
<v Speaker 2>so you know this is the kind of stuff where,

0:57:46.120 --> 0:57:47.880
<v Speaker 2>of course this is the long stretch of history, but

0:57:47.880 --> 0:57:50.360
<v Speaker 2>it's something where I think we don't think about geological

0:57:50.440 --> 0:57:54.320
<v Speaker 2>or geographical forces, and they do affect our politics. It's

0:57:54.360 --> 0:57:56.560
<v Speaker 2>just that we're completely oblivious to them, and they're not

0:57:56.600 --> 0:57:59.200
<v Speaker 2>that changing from election to election, so we're not fixating

0:57:59.200 --> 0:58:00.400
<v Speaker 2>them for punditry.

0:58:00.160 --> 0:58:04.920
<v Speaker 1>So your book forced me, as I was prepping for this,

0:58:05.560 --> 0:58:10.880
<v Speaker 1>to go back in time and rethink what's contingent, what's convergent.

0:58:11.480 --> 0:58:13.720
<v Speaker 1>And as I was prepping this, I'm going to ask

0:58:13.760 --> 0:58:16.280
<v Speaker 1>you about January sixth and Ukraine and Gaza. But before

0:58:16.320 --> 0:58:18.560
<v Speaker 1>I get to those questions, I want to stay with

0:58:18.680 --> 0:58:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Trump in twenty sixteen and Trump in twenty twenty. As

0:58:22.240 --> 0:58:27.040
<v Speaker 1>I was reading your language about the long fabric of

0:58:27.280 --> 0:58:35.600
<v Speaker 1>threads in history, the conversation unrelated had talked about Iraq

0:58:35.680 --> 0:58:39.200
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and three, and as I'm plowing through

0:58:39.200 --> 0:58:42.600
<v Speaker 1>the book, it sort of dawns on me the changes

0:58:42.640 --> 0:58:46.360
<v Speaker 1>that are put into place under the Bush administration with

0:58:46.440 --> 0:58:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Dick Cheney after nine to eleven, which essentially comes out

0:58:52.520 --> 0:58:56.680
<v Speaker 1>of Afghanistan. Iraq had nothing to do with this. The

0:58:56.720 --> 0:58:59.520
<v Speaker 1>idea that we're going to use this to invade a

0:58:59.560 --> 0:59:03.040
<v Speaker 1>country that's not related to nine to eleven and just

0:59:03.320 --> 0:59:07.200
<v Speaker 1>the ginned up weapons of mass destruction and all the

0:59:07.240 --> 0:59:10.120
<v Speaker 1>evidence that turned out to be no evidence at all.

0:59:10.800 --> 0:59:13.720
<v Speaker 1>That was at the time felt like a radical change.

0:59:13.720 --> 0:59:16.840
<v Speaker 1>That the government was not just lying to us about

0:59:16.880 --> 0:59:19.920
<v Speaker 1>little things we weren't paying attention to. They were like

0:59:20.160 --> 0:59:24.400
<v Speaker 1>clearly not telling the truth, which most of us either

0:59:24.400 --> 0:59:26.640
<v Speaker 1>didn't believe or didn't want to believe at the time.

0:59:27.160 --> 0:59:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Of course, there's got to be some reason to invade

0:59:29.560 --> 0:59:32.640
<v Speaker 1>a country. The Government's not just gonna make that up.

0:59:32.680 --> 0:59:35.480
<v Speaker 1>And I'm wondering if that is that a contingent. Is

0:59:35.480 --> 0:59:43.720
<v Speaker 1>that a convergence, because following the Bush Cheney administration, Donald

0:59:43.760 --> 0:59:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Trump was kind of radical. But for that, I think

0:59:48.120 --> 0:59:51.760
<v Speaker 1>if the Iraq War doesn't happen, and if the presentation

0:59:52.360 --> 0:59:55.040
<v Speaker 1>by Colin Powell at the UN doesn't happen and the

0:59:55.080 --> 0:59:58.959
<v Speaker 1>whole thing turns out to be bs afterwards, I think

0:59:58.960 --> 1:00:02.560
<v Speaker 1>that kind of made people a little cynical and Trump

1:00:02.720 --> 1:00:05.920
<v Speaker 1>was a modest step from that, whereas if that doesn't happen,

1:00:06.000 --> 1:00:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Trump is a radical leap from that.

1:00:07.960 --> 1:00:10.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Yeah, So the Iraq War is a great example

1:00:10.280 --> 1:00:12.440
<v Speaker 2>of this because I would go back even further to

1:00:12.480 --> 1:00:16.600
<v Speaker 2>the First Golf War as the as Lady ninety one. Yes, exactly, yes,

1:00:16.680 --> 1:00:18.600
<v Speaker 2>And I think this is an important part of the

1:00:18.640 --> 1:00:22.600
<v Speaker 2>story that leads to Bush Junior going into Iraq in

1:00:22.600 --> 1:00:26.320
<v Speaker 2>two thousand and three. So when Saddam Hussein was thinking

1:00:26.320 --> 1:00:29.160
<v Speaker 2>about invading Kuwait in the early nineteen nineties, the US

1:00:29.240 --> 1:00:32.000
<v Speaker 2>government wanted to tell him that if they if he

1:00:32.040 --> 1:00:34.360
<v Speaker 2>did this, they would attack him. But there were two

1:00:34.360 --> 1:00:36.920
<v Speaker 2>messages sent through diplomatic channels. One was called the Gillespie

1:00:36.960 --> 1:00:39.240
<v Speaker 2>Memo and the other one was a sort of official communicate,

1:00:40.240 --> 1:00:42.920
<v Speaker 2>and one of them was a little bit more lenient

1:00:42.960 --> 1:00:45.720
<v Speaker 2>than the other. It sort of sounded like, we will

1:00:45.720 --> 1:00:48.280
<v Speaker 2>disapprove of this, but you know, we won't attack you.

1:00:48.640 --> 1:00:50.600
<v Speaker 2>That was the sort of subtext of it, whereas the

1:00:50.600 --> 1:00:52.920
<v Speaker 2>other one was like, we will attack you. And what

1:00:53.000 --> 1:00:56.440
<v Speaker 2>happened was because there were these two signals, Saddam Hussein

1:00:56.480 --> 1:00:58.080
<v Speaker 2>picked the one that he thought was correct, and the

1:00:58.120 --> 1:00:59.520
<v Speaker 2>one that he thought was correct was they're not going

1:00:59.560 --> 1:01:02.120
<v Speaker 2>to do anything. So when you look at the reason

1:01:02.160 --> 1:01:03.920
<v Speaker 2>why he invades and then gets wiped out, I mean

1:01:03.920 --> 1:01:07.040
<v Speaker 2>you can look at the casualty numbers, it's like so ridiculously.

1:01:07.080 --> 1:01:09.360
<v Speaker 2>It's probably the most lopsided conflict in modern history.

1:01:09.480 --> 1:01:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Right.

1:01:11.440 --> 1:01:15.800
<v Speaker 2>This origin story goes back to a misinterpretation of two

1:01:15.880 --> 1:01:19.840
<v Speaker 2>conflicting signals that the US government basically miss He miscalculated based

1:01:19.840 --> 1:01:23.680
<v Speaker 2>on a misinterpretation of a diplomatic signal. If that doesn't happen,

1:01:23.760 --> 1:01:25.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, then you don't have the Bush connection to Iraq.

1:01:26.000 --> 1:01:28.800
<v Speaker 2>You know, there's all these questions of what will happen now.

1:01:29.440 --> 1:01:31.120
<v Speaker 2>I think there's there's a bigger point that I wanted

1:01:31.160 --> 1:01:33.560
<v Speaker 2>to get into here, which I think is where I

1:01:33.600 --> 1:01:35.400
<v Speaker 2>think about this differently from some other people. And I

1:01:35.440 --> 1:01:37.200
<v Speaker 2>realized this when I was talking about the book. So

1:01:37.200 --> 1:01:40.240
<v Speaker 2>I told a historian friend of mine the story of Kyoto, right,

1:01:40.560 --> 1:01:42.480
<v Speaker 2>and how Kyoto doesn't get blown up in the atomic

1:01:42.480 --> 1:01:45.960
<v Speaker 2>bomb from this vacation. And he says, okay, but hold on, like,

1:01:46.040 --> 1:01:47.720
<v Speaker 2>the US is still going to win the war, right,

1:01:47.760 --> 1:01:48.960
<v Speaker 2>Like it doesn't. Like, I mean, at the end of

1:01:49.000 --> 1:01:50.520
<v Speaker 2>the day, if they drop the bomb on Kyoto, they'ld

1:01:50.560 --> 1:01:51.960
<v Speaker 2>drop the bomb in Erosia, They're still going to win

1:01:52.000 --> 1:01:54.480
<v Speaker 2>the war. I'm like, yes, that's true. The problem I

1:01:54.520 --> 1:01:56.080
<v Speaker 2>think we make when we think about these things is

1:01:56.120 --> 1:01:59.280
<v Speaker 2>we impose categories that don't really exist because there's a

1:01:59.280 --> 1:02:01.320
<v Speaker 2>binary of whether you win the war or not. But

1:02:01.360 --> 1:02:04.840
<v Speaker 2>the question is does Japan develop in the same way

1:02:04.920 --> 1:02:08.160
<v Speaker 2>if you swap out Kyoto for Hiroshima. I don't think so, right,

1:02:08.160 --> 1:02:10.880
<v Speaker 2>there's totally different people who live and die. And also

1:02:10.920 --> 1:02:13.120
<v Speaker 2>one of the people who's one of the founding you know,

1:02:13.200 --> 1:02:17.080
<v Speaker 2>scientists of modern meteorology was in Kyoto, so like he

1:02:17.120 --> 1:02:19.200
<v Speaker 2>would have probably died. And this is a lot of

1:02:19.200 --> 1:02:22.320
<v Speaker 2>the stuff that ends up helping us basically detect major storms.

1:02:22.560 --> 1:02:24.320
<v Speaker 2>So you think there's I mean, even that's just a

1:02:24.360 --> 1:02:26.400
<v Speaker 2>small ripple effect that we can imagine that. Okay, maybe

1:02:26.480 --> 1:02:29.160
<v Speaker 2>mederology goes a little bit differently. So you know, what

1:02:29.240 --> 1:02:30.720
<v Speaker 2>I think about with some of this stuff is like,

1:02:31.080 --> 1:02:33.040
<v Speaker 2>you know, do we end up invading Iraq or not?

1:02:33.160 --> 1:02:35.560
<v Speaker 2>Maybe we still do. Maybe that's the convergence. Maybe there's

1:02:35.560 --> 1:02:38.600
<v Speaker 2>still a war, But the way it happens matters, And

1:02:38.640 --> 1:02:41.040
<v Speaker 2>I think, you know, the way the conflict unfolds, the

1:02:41.040 --> 1:02:43.960
<v Speaker 2>way that the losses accrue, the way that you know,

1:02:44.800 --> 1:02:47.640
<v Speaker 2>the way the US had relationships with Osama bin Laden

1:02:47.680 --> 1:02:49.520
<v Speaker 2>when he was a you know, a fighter in Afghanistan,

1:02:49.560 --> 1:02:52.600
<v Speaker 2>and it I mean all this stuff matters, and I

1:02:52.600 --> 1:02:54.280
<v Speaker 2>think the thing that we tend to do is we

1:02:54.320 --> 1:02:56.200
<v Speaker 2>tend to just say, well, it would have been the same,

1:02:56.240 --> 1:03:00.120
<v Speaker 2>because in our category, which is a fake construction and

1:03:00.160 --> 1:03:01.960
<v Speaker 2>of the way we think about the world, it's the

1:03:02.000 --> 1:03:04.960
<v Speaker 2>same binary outcome, Right, you win the war, you don't.

1:03:05.440 --> 1:03:07.720
<v Speaker 2>But the way you win the war actually affects the future.

1:03:07.760 --> 1:03:09.240
<v Speaker 2>And so that's the kind of stuff I think. I'm

1:03:09.280 --> 1:03:11.000
<v Speaker 2>sure that people in business understand this as well, where

1:03:11.040 --> 1:03:13.800
<v Speaker 2>it's like, you know, the way that a product launches, Yeah,

1:03:13.840 --> 1:03:16.480
<v Speaker 2>it's a success, but if it's five percent more of

1:03:16.520 --> 1:03:18.520
<v Speaker 2>a success, that might affect the way that you behave

1:03:18.560 --> 1:03:20.200
<v Speaker 2>in your future investments, and then that's going to have

1:03:20.280 --> 1:03:21.320
<v Speaker 2>ripple effects in the future.

1:03:21.640 --> 1:03:23.920
<v Speaker 1>The way you win the war or not is the

1:03:23.920 --> 1:03:29.080
<v Speaker 1>theme of liqud. A'mat's book Lords of Finance. The conditions

1:03:29.080 --> 1:03:33.440
<v Speaker 1>that were imposed after World War One. Yep, pretty directly

1:03:33.560 --> 1:03:36.840
<v Speaker 1>leads to Germany and World War Two. But for those

1:03:37.280 --> 1:03:41.680
<v Speaker 1>very stringent conditions that lead to Germany being broken and

1:03:41.680 --> 1:03:44.560
<v Speaker 1>then the rise of the hyperinflation in the Weimar Republican

1:03:45.520 --> 1:03:49.640
<v Speaker 1>that was a series of choices, and he very brilliantly

1:03:49.680 --> 1:03:54.400
<v Speaker 1>tells the story of this was absolutely not convergent. It

1:03:54.440 --> 1:03:55.640
<v Speaker 1>didn't have to happen that way.

1:03:55.720 --> 1:03:58.120
<v Speaker 2>Well, the story that is famous about World War One

1:03:58.160 --> 1:04:01.120
<v Speaker 2>is how Archiduke Franz ferdinance car breaks down right in

1:04:01.120 --> 1:04:04.120
<v Speaker 2>front of the assassin who kills him. It's a complete accident, right.

1:04:04.480 --> 1:04:06.560
<v Speaker 2>I actually found a different contingency that I think is

1:04:06.560 --> 1:04:09.080
<v Speaker 2>even more bewildering, which is that Franz Ferda and the

1:04:09.160 --> 1:04:12.840
<v Speaker 2>Archduke goes to England about I think several months before

1:04:12.880 --> 1:04:16.800
<v Speaker 2>he's actually killed in Sarajevo, and he ends up on

1:04:16.840 --> 1:04:19.920
<v Speaker 2>a hunting expedition at this place called Welbeck Abbey, and

1:04:20.080 --> 1:04:23.360
<v Speaker 2>the person who's loading the shotguns slips because there's just

1:04:23.360 --> 1:04:26.040
<v Speaker 2>been a snowstorm, and the gun goes off and a

1:04:26.080 --> 1:04:29.040
<v Speaker 2>bullet goes right over the shoulder of the Archduke and

1:04:29.120 --> 1:04:32.160
<v Speaker 2>misses him by like three inches. And you think to yourself, Okay,

1:04:32.160 --> 1:04:34.120
<v Speaker 2>So if this guy slips in a slightly different way

1:04:34.160 --> 1:04:36.640
<v Speaker 2>and hits him in the head and the trigger event

1:04:36.720 --> 1:04:40.240
<v Speaker 2>of World War One is instead dead already in Wellbeck Abbey,

1:04:40.360 --> 1:04:42.160
<v Speaker 2>does World War One happen? Now? This is a debate

1:04:42.160 --> 1:04:45.560
<v Speaker 2>that historians really can't answer, and there's lots of people

1:04:45.560 --> 1:04:47.440
<v Speaker 2>on both sides of the argument. And I think the

1:04:47.920 --> 1:04:51.000
<v Speaker 2>point is maybe World War one still happens, but if

1:04:51.000 --> 1:04:53.439
<v Speaker 2>it's not triggered by this assassination, the way the war

1:04:53.800 --> 1:04:55.560
<v Speaker 2>is going to unfold is going to be different. Does

1:04:55.600 --> 1:04:57.200
<v Speaker 2>it lead to Nazi Germany the same? I mean, these

1:04:57.200 --> 1:04:59.240
<v Speaker 2>are the things where I think what we do is

1:04:59.280 --> 1:05:01.800
<v Speaker 2>we just pretend these things don't matter that much because

1:05:01.840 --> 1:05:04.440
<v Speaker 2>it's so overwhelming. I mean, if the idea that somebody

1:05:04.560 --> 1:05:06.640
<v Speaker 2>slipping is the response, you know, is sort of the

1:05:06.760 --> 1:05:09.720
<v Speaker 2>proximate cause of millions of deaths and then the rise

1:05:09.760 --> 1:05:12.479
<v Speaker 2>of Nazism. I mean, this is the kind of stuff

1:05:12.480 --> 1:05:14.800
<v Speaker 2>where it's just so overwhelming that you mnd blow in.

1:05:14.920 --> 1:05:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so let me throw some more again your political science.

1:05:18.960 --> 1:05:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about some some recent political actions that are

1:05:22.840 --> 1:05:26.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of fascinating and ask the question, is this convergence

1:05:26.600 --> 1:05:30.040
<v Speaker 1>or contingency the Russian invasion of Ukraine.

1:05:30.640 --> 1:05:33.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you know, I think this is uh, it's they're

1:05:33.480 --> 1:05:36.240
<v Speaker 2>always both. But the convergence of this is the sort

1:05:36.280 --> 1:05:40.400
<v Speaker 2>of long standing humiliation of Russia that Vladimir Putin has

1:05:40.440 --> 1:05:43.240
<v Speaker 2>a very big chip on his shoulder about, you know,

1:05:43.280 --> 1:05:45.560
<v Speaker 2>sort of the fact that he has this predisposition to

1:05:45.640 --> 1:05:47.760
<v Speaker 2>view Russia as a major global power because he was

1:05:47.760 --> 1:05:49.960
<v Speaker 2>in the KGB and so on. You know that I

1:05:49.960 --> 1:05:52.120
<v Speaker 2>think is a long term trend. And like Trump, sorry,

1:05:52.160 --> 1:05:55.480
<v Speaker 2>Putin was always very very keen on reestablishing Russian dominance.

1:05:56.000 --> 1:05:57.760
<v Speaker 2>But I think there was some stuff where there was

1:05:57.800 --> 1:06:00.640
<v Speaker 2>some serious miscalculations going on, and this is where the

1:06:00.800 --> 1:06:03.760
<v Speaker 2>contingencies I think could have cropped up. So I wrote

1:06:03.760 --> 1:06:05.760
<v Speaker 2>a piece for The Atlantic in twenty twenty two right

1:06:05.760 --> 1:06:10.600
<v Speaker 2>after the invasion happened, where it was like, look, what

1:06:10.640 --> 1:06:14.080
<v Speaker 2>happens with dictators is they purge all the people who

1:06:14.160 --> 1:06:17.240
<v Speaker 2>challenge them and tell them the truth, nothing but yes men, exactly.

1:06:17.240 --> 1:06:19.760
<v Speaker 2>And this happens over decades. So the fact that Putin

1:06:19.800 --> 1:06:22.000
<v Speaker 2>stayed in power for so long, he probably got some

1:06:22.040 --> 1:06:24.080
<v Speaker 2>really bad information that told them, look, it's going to

1:06:24.080 --> 1:06:26.880
<v Speaker 2>be three day war, and then he miscalculates based on this, and.

1:06:26.840 --> 1:06:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Ill look back at the annexation of Crimea that kind

1:06:31.120 --> 1:06:32.520
<v Speaker 1>of was a three day war exactly.

1:06:32.600 --> 1:06:36.400
<v Speaker 2>And this is where I think the aspects of contingency

1:06:36.880 --> 1:06:40.280
<v Speaker 2>are tied to the personality traits of leaders sometimes and

1:06:40.360 --> 1:06:42.160
<v Speaker 2>if you have a different Russian president, maybe he doesn't

1:06:42.160 --> 1:06:43.400
<v Speaker 2>do the same thing, right, And I think this is

1:06:43.400 --> 1:06:46.880
<v Speaker 2>the kind of stuff where political science, you know, this

1:06:46.920 --> 1:06:48.800
<v Speaker 2>is a little bit of inside baseball. Political science is

1:06:48.840 --> 1:06:52.480
<v Speaker 2>obsessed with institutions. We tried to explain through institutions, and

1:06:52.480 --> 1:06:54.520
<v Speaker 2>there was a long standing viewpoint. This speaks to, you know,

1:06:54.600 --> 1:06:57.000
<v Speaker 2>January sixth and Trump and all these other things, that

1:06:57.160 --> 1:06:59.920
<v Speaker 2>the institution of the president matters, not the president themselves.

1:07:00.640 --> 1:07:03.760
<v Speaker 2>And I think Trump obliterated this mentality. Putin also obliterates

1:07:03.760 --> 1:07:05.600
<v Speaker 2>this mentality. Nobody thinks the world would be the same

1:07:05.720 --> 1:07:07.120
<v Speaker 2>Hillary Clinton had one in twenty.

1:07:06.920 --> 1:07:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Sixteen, clearly very different, and you could say the same

1:07:09.280 --> 1:07:12.320
<v Speaker 1>thing about Bush versus Gore completely. I think the world

1:07:12.480 --> 1:07:15.680
<v Speaker 1>it feels like we took a different track following the

1:07:15.680 --> 1:07:17.040
<v Speaker 1>two thousand election as well.

1:07:17.160 --> 1:07:18.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And I think this is where we make the mistake.

1:07:18.800 --> 1:07:21.840
<v Speaker 2>I mean, contingency is obviously amplified for people in power.

1:07:22.000 --> 1:07:26.240
<v Speaker 2>Hierarchies make contingency more more influential and on a shorter

1:07:26.320 --> 1:07:29.480
<v Speaker 2>time scales. But everyone is affecting the world in some way, right,

1:07:29.520 --> 1:07:31.080
<v Speaker 2>I mean, like we all have. As I say, we

1:07:31.120 --> 1:07:34.000
<v Speaker 2>control nothing but influence everything. I mean that for ordinary people.

1:07:33.760 --> 1:07:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Say that again, we control nothing but influence everything.

1:07:36.600 --> 1:07:38.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And I think that what this means is that

1:07:38.440 --> 1:07:41.800
<v Speaker 2>we cannot control anything. There's nothing that we have absolute

1:07:41.840 --> 1:07:44.200
<v Speaker 2>control over, but everything that we do has ripple effects.

1:07:44.240 --> 1:07:46.960
<v Speaker 2>Every single action we make has ripple effects. The question

1:07:47.080 --> 1:07:50.520
<v Speaker 2>is on what timescale are those important and how much

1:07:50.560 --> 1:07:53.000
<v Speaker 2>are they affecting people around the world. So when Joe

1:07:53.040 --> 1:07:56.840
<v Speaker 2>Biden does something, the contingency of that is highly probable

1:07:56.880 --> 1:07:59.440
<v Speaker 2>that it will affect lots and lots of people. Whereas

1:07:59.480 --> 1:08:01.560
<v Speaker 2>if you're somebody who's a hermit living in the forest,

1:08:01.880 --> 1:08:03.840
<v Speaker 2>it's not going to affect that many people right away.

1:08:04.120 --> 1:08:06.400
<v Speaker 2>Is it going to affect nobody? No, because if that

1:08:06.480 --> 1:08:08.720
<v Speaker 2>hermit went and met somebody else, they would have a baby,

1:08:08.720 --> 1:08:10.920
<v Speaker 2>and that baby might you know, rise up to you know,

1:08:11.080 --> 1:08:13.200
<v Speaker 2>change the world, and who knows. So I think the

1:08:13.320 --> 1:08:16.080
<v Speaker 2>idea is that everyone is influencing the future all the time.

1:08:16.520 --> 1:08:18.880
<v Speaker 2>The question is just on what timescale and how many

1:08:18.920 --> 1:08:20.639
<v Speaker 2>people will be affected in a way that we think

1:08:20.720 --> 1:08:21.480
<v Speaker 2>is consequential.

1:08:21.520 --> 1:08:25.840
<v Speaker 1>So you mentioned January sixth, That feels more like it's

1:08:25.880 --> 1:08:30.679
<v Speaker 1>a contingency. But you're implying a lot of these things

1:08:30.760 --> 1:08:34.360
<v Speaker 1>are convergent and might have happened given all the events

1:08:34.360 --> 1:08:35.560
<v Speaker 1>that took place beforehand.

1:08:35.760 --> 1:08:37.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so I think the build up to January sixth

1:08:38.000 --> 1:08:40.960
<v Speaker 2>was I think relatively predictable. I wrote a column actually

1:08:41.240 --> 1:08:42.840
<v Speaker 2>about six months before it, where I said, look, I

1:08:42.840 --> 1:08:44.600
<v Speaker 2>think there's going to be violence between the election and

1:08:44.600 --> 1:08:47.560
<v Speaker 2>the inauguration, significant political violence between the election and the inauguration.

1:08:47.880 --> 1:08:50.519
<v Speaker 2>And it wasn't like, it wasn't something that was completely

1:08:50.560 --> 1:08:52.679
<v Speaker 2>out of left field. It was possible that these forces

1:08:52.720 --> 1:08:53.960
<v Speaker 2>were amassing.

1:08:54.520 --> 1:08:54.720
<v Speaker 1>You know.

1:08:54.760 --> 1:08:57.000
<v Speaker 2>I think the contingency is there were a few of

1:08:57.000 --> 1:08:59.759
<v Speaker 2>the people in the group that took over the capital

1:08:59.840 --> 1:09:03.600
<v Speaker 2>that had zip tizze and were trying to kidnap politicians

1:09:03.640 --> 1:09:06.759
<v Speaker 2>hang like Pennce. Yeah, and you know there are videos

1:09:06.760 --> 1:09:08.720
<v Speaker 2>you can see in that in the in the CCTV

1:09:08.840 --> 1:09:11.960
<v Speaker 2>where they were close, and you know, how does how

1:09:12.000 --> 1:09:14.720
<v Speaker 2>does American politics unfold if somebody actually gets killed in that?

1:09:15.320 --> 1:09:17.880
<v Speaker 2>I mean, there's there's a lot of things where you know,

1:09:18.000 --> 1:09:19.880
<v Speaker 2>they kill a senior politician or something, and that's going

1:09:19.920 --> 1:09:22.080
<v Speaker 2>to change the dynamics of the country. I think that

1:09:22.120 --> 1:09:24.240
<v Speaker 2>if they had had a you know, if the if

1:09:24.280 --> 1:09:27.080
<v Speaker 2>the outcome of January sixth had been worse in that regard,

1:09:27.200 --> 1:09:29.599
<v Speaker 2>if there had been a senior politician murdered by somebody

1:09:29.600 --> 1:09:32.960
<v Speaker 2>in the in the in the group. You know, that

1:09:33.040 --> 1:09:35.960
<v Speaker 2>would have been harder for Trump to recover from Politically.

1:09:35.600 --> 1:09:39.479
<v Speaker 1>I think I was surprised how quickly he recovered trust.

1:09:40.080 --> 1:09:43.240
<v Speaker 1>What looked like, you know, from my perspective, the game

1:09:43.320 --> 1:09:48.000
<v Speaker 1>theory was, Hey, I'm a conservative Republican and I'm against

1:09:48.040 --> 1:09:50.879
<v Speaker 1>abortion and in favor of tax cuts. I got everything

1:09:50.920 --> 1:09:53.800
<v Speaker 1>I want from Trump. Let's throw them under the bus

1:09:53.800 --> 1:09:56.760
<v Speaker 1>and move on. We could retake our party. I was

1:09:56.840 --> 1:10:03.000
<v Speaker 1>shocked at that a principle didn't permeate the Republican right

1:10:03.280 --> 1:10:06.599
<v Speaker 1>because it looked like, in real time, Hey, you guys

1:10:06.640 --> 1:10:08.880
<v Speaker 1>don't need this guy anymore. He just did you a

1:10:08.920 --> 1:10:09.559
<v Speaker 1>huge favor.

1:10:10.000 --> 1:10:11.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Well, and this is also where, you know, the

1:10:11.680 --> 1:10:15.280
<v Speaker 2>dynamics of contingency play into this in a huge way,

1:10:15.320 --> 1:10:17.360
<v Speaker 2>because part of the anger that I think exists on

1:10:17.360 --> 1:10:20.200
<v Speaker 2>the political right is the backlash to policies during the

1:10:20.240 --> 1:10:22.960
<v Speaker 2>pandemic and some of the information that people in the

1:10:23.000 --> 1:10:26.519
<v Speaker 2>Republican Party share about the pandemic and so on, And

1:10:26.760 --> 1:10:29.400
<v Speaker 2>that is a single person in China getting infected by

1:10:29.400 --> 1:10:31.000
<v Speaker 2>a mutation of a virus, you know what I mean.

1:10:31.240 --> 1:10:33.040
<v Speaker 2>So like, you know, you think about the twenty twenty race.

1:10:33.080 --> 1:10:35.880
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it is affected profoundly by one person getting sick.

1:10:36.120 --> 1:10:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Right. My argument has long been that but for the

1:10:39.120 --> 1:10:44.040
<v Speaker 1>mishandling of COVID, he would have easily cruised to reelection. Yeah.

1:10:44.040 --> 1:10:46.639
<v Speaker 1>I mean of he was fine pre COVID, and people

1:10:46.680 --> 1:10:48.080
<v Speaker 1>tend to vote their pocepo Yeah.

1:10:48.320 --> 1:10:49.760
<v Speaker 2>And this is the stuff where I think we just

1:10:49.840 --> 1:10:52.840
<v Speaker 2>can never know, but I I know. My point is

1:10:52.840 --> 1:10:56.879
<v Speaker 2>that when you accept that these things are so fragile,

1:10:57.600 --> 1:11:00.439
<v Speaker 2>the hubrist that comes with it is reduced because you

1:11:00.479 --> 1:11:03.640
<v Speaker 2>start to think, Okay, A, this is not inevitable. B

1:11:03.840 --> 1:11:06.640
<v Speaker 2>I didn't control this completely. And see, because it's so

1:11:07.600 --> 1:11:13.400
<v Speaker 2>derived from contingency, maybe I shouldn't over confidently try to

1:11:13.439 --> 1:11:15.840
<v Speaker 2>manipulate the system. I think these are the things where,

1:11:15.880 --> 1:11:18.000
<v Speaker 2>like you know, some people will think will be listening

1:11:18.040 --> 1:11:19.000
<v Speaker 2>to me and say, oh, this is a bit of

1:11:19.040 --> 1:11:20.960
<v Speaker 2>a parlor game. These are all thought experiments, et cetera.

1:11:21.120 --> 1:11:23.120
<v Speaker 2>I think the lesson, the important lesson, is that when

1:11:23.160 --> 1:11:26.479
<v Speaker 2>you accept these strange happenstance events the way chaos theory

1:11:26.479 --> 1:11:31.120
<v Speaker 2>actually works in social systems, you have an appreciation for

1:11:31.160 --> 1:11:34.160
<v Speaker 2>the fact that you simply cannot control anything. And when

1:11:34.240 --> 1:11:36.920
<v Speaker 2>you accept that you live in a world where you

1:11:36.920 --> 1:11:39.280
<v Speaker 2>are more likely to focus on resilience and less likely

1:11:39.320 --> 1:11:41.720
<v Speaker 2>to focus on optimization to the absolute work.

1:11:41.920 --> 1:11:47.240
<v Speaker 1>So last two random examples I want to ask about. First.

1:11:47.560 --> 1:11:50.719
<v Speaker 1>I love the example you give of Keith Jarrett live

1:11:50.760 --> 1:11:53.920
<v Speaker 1>at the Opera House in Germany. He's supposed to come

1:11:53.960 --> 1:11:59.160
<v Speaker 1>in and play on a beautiful, you know, concert piano.

1:11:59.280 --> 1:12:02.799
<v Speaker 1>Instead he shows up, there's an old, rickety attitude piano,

1:12:03.360 --> 1:12:08.280
<v Speaker 1>and he has to improvise around broken keys and attitude notes.

1:12:08.800 --> 1:12:12.200
<v Speaker 1>This becomes the best selling solo jazz album in history.

1:12:12.479 --> 1:12:15.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so this is the lesson of how sometimes forced

1:12:15.200 --> 1:12:18.479
<v Speaker 2>experimentation can be really good for innovation. So you know,

1:12:18.520 --> 1:12:21.400
<v Speaker 2>this guy, basically you know, plays a crappy piano and

1:12:21.520 --> 1:12:24.559
<v Speaker 2>ends up producing something incredible. He never would have chosen

1:12:24.600 --> 1:12:26.519
<v Speaker 2>to do that. It was forced on him, right, it

1:12:26.520 --> 1:12:28.760
<v Speaker 2>was an accident. Now, one of my favorite studies that's

1:12:28.800 --> 1:12:30.960
<v Speaker 2>around that section of the book is a study about

1:12:31.160 --> 1:12:34.200
<v Speaker 2>a tube strike in London where they've geolocated all the

1:12:34.280 --> 1:12:36.479
<v Speaker 2>data of the commuters and they look at these anonymous

1:12:36.479 --> 1:12:39.680
<v Speaker 2>cell phone data pathways to work and everybody has to

1:12:39.680 --> 1:12:41.479
<v Speaker 2>find a different way to work because the subway system

1:12:41.520 --> 1:12:43.479
<v Speaker 2>has just been shut down by these drivers on strike.

1:12:43.840 --> 1:12:45.919
<v Speaker 2>What they found is that five percent of the commuters

1:12:46.000 --> 1:12:48.759
<v Speaker 2>stuck with the new pathway to work after the strike

1:12:49.000 --> 1:12:51.080
<v Speaker 2>because they were forced to sort of try something new

1:12:51.120 --> 1:12:53.720
<v Speaker 2>and they realized they've liked the new alternative. And I

1:12:53.760 --> 1:12:56.320
<v Speaker 2>think this is something where because of optimization in our lives,

1:12:56.320 --> 1:12:58.320
<v Speaker 2>you know, we're always looking for the trip Advisor quote

1:12:58.360 --> 1:13:01.679
<v Speaker 2>or you know, the perfect way on maps, you experiment less.

1:13:01.840 --> 1:13:04.320
<v Speaker 2>And when you experiment less, you actually find that you

1:13:04.600 --> 1:13:06.640
<v Speaker 2>don't navigate uncertainty as well. And I think this is

1:13:06.640 --> 1:13:09.160
<v Speaker 2>the lesson again. It brings us back to evolution. The

1:13:09.160 --> 1:13:12.519
<v Speaker 2>wisdom of evolution is experimentation through uncertainty, and I think

1:13:12.520 --> 1:13:17.000
<v Speaker 2>that's where humans, when they have hubris, experiment less and

1:13:17.040 --> 1:13:19.000
<v Speaker 2>become less resilient. And I think it's a very important

1:13:19.040 --> 1:13:19.559
<v Speaker 2>lesson for us.

1:13:19.640 --> 1:13:22.120
<v Speaker 1>All Right, so now I'm gonna get super wonky on you,

1:13:22.600 --> 1:13:27.559
<v Speaker 1>and you use the thought experiment of Laplace's demon. You

1:13:27.640 --> 1:13:32.599
<v Speaker 1>have a demon that has perfect knowledge of every atom

1:13:32.800 --> 1:13:36.400
<v Speaker 1>in the universe, but I and because of that precise detail,

1:13:36.600 --> 1:13:39.120
<v Speaker 1>they know everything that's happened, they know everything that's going

1:13:39.160 --> 1:13:41.960
<v Speaker 1>on right now, and they know that everything that's gonna happen.

1:13:42.120 --> 1:13:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Let me throw a curveball at you. The latest findings

1:13:46.120 --> 1:13:52.360
<v Speaker 1>from quantum research and physics is that, well, you can

1:13:52.520 --> 1:13:55.519
<v Speaker 1>know everything. You could know the location of electron or

1:13:55.640 --> 1:14:00.800
<v Speaker 1>its spin and handedness, but not both. So that kind

1:14:00.800 --> 1:14:04.880
<v Speaker 1>of raises the question. Even Laplace's thought experiment with the demon,

1:14:05.920 --> 1:14:09.400
<v Speaker 1>there's too much randomness to for even an all knowing

1:14:10.400 --> 1:14:12.360
<v Speaker 1>demon to be able to predict the future.

1:14:12.400 --> 1:14:14.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we're covering all the basis today. We got quantum mechanics. Now,

1:14:15.000 --> 1:14:17.080
<v Speaker 2>so quantum mechanics, I mean, the thing is, it is

1:14:17.120 --> 1:14:20.400
<v Speaker 2>absolutely the case that the scientific interpretation of highly verified

1:14:20.400 --> 1:14:23.920
<v Speaker 2>experimental data is that probably the only genuinely random thing

1:14:23.960 --> 1:14:26.360
<v Speaker 2>in the universe is quantum effects at the atomic and

1:14:26.400 --> 1:14:29.639
<v Speaker 2>subatomic levels. Right now, the question is what does that mean?

1:14:30.080 --> 1:14:32.719
<v Speaker 2>And so this is where things get very trippy, very quickly,

1:14:32.720 --> 1:14:36.080
<v Speaker 2>because the many world's interpretation of quantum mechanics where an

1:14:36.120 --> 1:14:38.519
<v Speaker 2>infinite number of things that can happen do happen, and

1:14:38.600 --> 1:14:41.880
<v Speaker 2>there's an infinite copy of you in infinite universes, right,

1:14:42.600 --> 1:14:45.439
<v Speaker 2>that is still a deterministic universe where Laplace's demon could

1:14:45.479 --> 1:14:48.960
<v Speaker 2>theoretically be true, right, because then you would know you

1:14:49.040 --> 1:14:50.720
<v Speaker 2>just you wouldn't know which universe you were in, but

1:14:50.760 --> 1:14:53.280
<v Speaker 2>it would be all the universes are happening all the time, right.

1:14:53.560 --> 1:14:56.840
<v Speaker 2>Whereas if you take the standard interpretation of quantum mechanics

1:14:56.920 --> 1:14:59.600
<v Speaker 2>DU to the Copenhagen interpretation, then yes, you have irreducible

1:14:59.680 --> 1:15:04.400
<v Speaker 2>random indeterminism is correct, and therefore the plus's demon is nonsensical.

1:15:04.840 --> 1:15:06.360
<v Speaker 2>So you know, I mean, there's lots of reasons why

1:15:06.360 --> 1:15:08.280
<v Speaker 2>the plus's demon probably wouldn't work anyway that a lot

1:15:08.280 --> 1:15:12.160
<v Speaker 2>of philosophers have objections to, but it is This is

1:15:12.160 --> 1:15:14.960
<v Speaker 2>one of those fascinating questions I think, is that you know,

1:15:15.040 --> 1:15:18.120
<v Speaker 2>we have this world where we believe we have more

1:15:18.240 --> 1:15:22.240
<v Speaker 2>understanding than any you know, human ever alive, but the

1:15:22.280 --> 1:15:24.680
<v Speaker 2>big questions are still completely uncertain to us. We don't

1:15:24.760 --> 1:15:28.080
<v Speaker 2>understand consciousness, we have no idea what produces it, and

1:15:28.120 --> 1:15:31.439
<v Speaker 2>we also don't understand anything about quantum mechanics in terms

1:15:31.520 --> 1:15:33.720
<v Speaker 2>of what it actually means. And these are like the

1:15:33.760 --> 1:15:36.519
<v Speaker 2>building blocks of our world, you know, I think that's

1:15:36.560 --> 1:15:39.280
<v Speaker 2>pretty amazing to imagine that, and it gives us a

1:15:39.280 --> 1:15:42.439
<v Speaker 2>healthy dose of sort of you know, a bit of

1:15:42.840 --> 1:15:46.479
<v Speaker 2>humility because we just there's so much we still don't understand, but.

1:15:46.520 --> 1:15:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Throw free will in that also, whether or not you

1:15:49.120 --> 1:15:53.240
<v Speaker 1>right between the intersection of quantum mechanics and consciousness. You know,

1:15:53.320 --> 1:15:57.479
<v Speaker 1>do we really control even our own agency? Forget the

1:15:57.520 --> 1:16:00.280
<v Speaker 1>rest of the world. It's it's even more comp life.

1:16:00.280 --> 1:16:03.120
<v Speaker 1>So I only have you for a handful of minutes,

1:16:03.160 --> 1:16:06.120
<v Speaker 1>and I want to jump to my favorite questions that

1:16:06.200 --> 1:16:11.560
<v Speaker 1>I ask all of my guests, starting with tell us, Uh,

1:16:11.640 --> 1:16:14.040
<v Speaker 1>what you've been streaming these days? What are you watching

1:16:14.160 --> 1:16:15.800
<v Speaker 1>or listening to? Yeah?

1:16:16.080 --> 1:16:18.120
<v Speaker 2>My favorite show that I've been watching recently is called

1:16:18.160 --> 1:16:22.240
<v Speaker 2>Slow Horses, the great TV Yeah, the great spy drama.

1:16:22.400 --> 1:16:24.360
<v Speaker 2>And I've read all the books to which I highly

1:16:24.400 --> 1:16:27.640
<v Speaker 2>recommend by Mick Herron. You know, I think there's uh

1:16:28.680 --> 1:16:30.600
<v Speaker 2>in terms of in terms of podcasts if people are

1:16:30.640 --> 1:16:32.639
<v Speaker 2>interested in some of the ideas that I've been talking about.

1:16:33.280 --> 1:16:36.280
<v Speaker 2>There's a podcast called Mindscape by a physicist named Sean

1:16:36.280 --> 1:16:37.960
<v Speaker 2>Carroll who's one of the main proponents of the many

1:16:37.960 --> 1:16:41.240
<v Speaker 2>worlds hypothesis. It's nerdy. I'm not gonna lie you know

1:16:41.280 --> 1:16:43.479
<v Speaker 2>this is it's a brainy podcast, but it's something where

1:16:43.800 --> 1:16:46.959
<v Speaker 2>he brings on really smart people and ask them questions

1:16:47.000 --> 1:16:49.240
<v Speaker 2>that only Sean Carroll could come up with as a

1:16:49.360 --> 1:16:53.559
<v Speaker 2>highly highly informed quantum mechanics researcher, but about all sorts

1:16:53.600 --> 1:16:57.479
<v Speaker 2>of things politics, economics, life, philosophy, et cetera. So I

1:16:57.560 --> 1:16:59.120
<v Speaker 2>highly recommend the Mindscape podcast.

1:16:59.479 --> 1:17:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Tell us about out your mentors who helped shape your career?

1:17:03.439 --> 1:17:05.479
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you know, I mean I think my mom was

1:17:05.520 --> 1:17:07.800
<v Speaker 2>one of them. She decided to run for school board

1:17:07.800 --> 1:17:09.800
<v Speaker 2>and that's probably the reason why I ended up interested

1:17:09.800 --> 1:17:11.559
<v Speaker 2>in politics when I was eight years old and she

1:17:11.600 --> 1:17:14.120
<v Speaker 2>decided to run for the local school board. You know,

1:17:14.120 --> 1:17:15.720
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot of a lot of teachers I had.

1:17:15.760 --> 1:17:19.160
<v Speaker 2>I think my main one, though, is my PhD advisor,

1:17:19.680 --> 1:17:22.640
<v Speaker 2>Nick Cheeseman is his name. He's a professor previously at

1:17:22.640 --> 1:17:25.400
<v Speaker 2>Oxford now at the University of Birmingham. We co wrote

1:17:25.400 --> 1:17:27.040
<v Speaker 2>a book together called had to Rig An Election? And

1:17:27.080 --> 1:17:29.920
<v Speaker 2>you know, I mean, what year was that. This came

1:17:29.960 --> 1:17:34.320
<v Speaker 2>out in twenty eighteen, so it's all about election rigging

1:17:34.320 --> 1:17:37.040
<v Speaker 2>around the world, but it's you know, he was one

1:17:37.080 --> 1:17:38.840
<v Speaker 2>of these people who just like really taught me how

1:17:38.880 --> 1:17:41.840
<v Speaker 2>to think about change in a very detailed and complex way.

1:17:42.640 --> 1:17:44.080
<v Speaker 2>And I owe a lot of my career to him,

1:17:44.120 --> 1:17:44.400
<v Speaker 2>I think.

1:17:44.960 --> 1:17:48.320
<v Speaker 1>And since you mentioned books, let's talk about what you're

1:17:48.360 --> 1:17:50.360
<v Speaker 1>reading now and what are some of your favorites.

1:17:51.360 --> 1:17:54.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so I read a lot of fiction and nonfiction both.

1:17:54.920 --> 1:17:58.400
<v Speaker 2>There's a nonfiction book I highly recommend called Beyond Measure

1:17:58.479 --> 1:18:00.680
<v Speaker 2>by James Vincent, and it really does dovetail with some

1:18:00.720 --> 1:18:03.360
<v Speaker 2>of the ideas we've been talking about. It's a history

1:18:03.400 --> 1:18:06.120
<v Speaker 2>of measurement, and this is a perfect example of what

1:18:06.120 --> 1:18:08.040
<v Speaker 2>I talked about with Locke in because the sort of

1:18:08.040 --> 1:18:12.240
<v Speaker 2>way that we subdivide the world is often completely arbitrary.

1:18:12.320 --> 1:18:14.720
<v Speaker 2>So much of America, by the way, is arranged the

1:18:14.720 --> 1:18:16.760
<v Speaker 2>way it is because of a thing called the Gunter's chain,

1:18:17.040 --> 1:18:19.200
<v Speaker 2>which is why city blocks are arranged the way they are.

1:18:19.240 --> 1:18:22.559
<v Speaker 2>It's this arbitrary measure to try to subdivide land in

1:18:22.600 --> 1:18:25.679
<v Speaker 2>a way that was standardized. So yeah, Beyond Measures very good.

1:18:26.360 --> 1:18:29.719
<v Speaker 2>I love Kurt Vonnegut as a novelist. He's book Cat's

1:18:29.720 --> 1:18:32.360
<v Speaker 2>Cradle and Sirens of Titan are my two favorite novels,

1:18:32.360 --> 1:18:35.120
<v Speaker 2>along with Douglas Adams's work, Hey Checker's Guide to the Galaxy.

1:18:35.160 --> 1:18:36.599
<v Speaker 2>So I can't recommend all of those enough.

1:18:37.960 --> 1:18:40.880
<v Speaker 1>It's funny because when you're talking about the various things

1:18:40.880 --> 1:18:45.000
<v Speaker 1>that change history, I'm normally not a big fan of

1:18:45.040 --> 1:18:49.000
<v Speaker 1>the revisionist history. But Man in the High Castle by

1:18:49.040 --> 1:18:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Philip K. Dick, What happens if the US loses World

1:18:52.280 --> 1:18:54.880
<v Speaker 1>War Two and Japan and Germany take over the world?

1:18:55.560 --> 1:19:01.720
<v Speaker 1>Fascinating book, along Thost similar concepts, and our final two questions.

1:19:02.040 --> 1:19:05.000
<v Speaker 1>What sort of advice would you give a recent college

1:19:05.080 --> 1:19:10.679
<v Speaker 1>grad interested in a career in either political science or writing.

1:19:11.360 --> 1:19:14.200
<v Speaker 2>It's fine. I do give advice to people who are

1:19:14.200 --> 1:19:16.400
<v Speaker 2>about to graduate all the time, and what I always

1:19:16.400 --> 1:19:19.000
<v Speaker 2>tell them is to try things out. I mean, the

1:19:19.040 --> 1:19:24.280
<v Speaker 2>period of exploration in the twenties is one where I

1:19:24.360 --> 1:19:27.240
<v Speaker 2>think people end up much happier if they sort of

1:19:27.240 --> 1:19:29.640
<v Speaker 2>do a trial and error approach, realize what works for

1:19:29.680 --> 1:19:32.320
<v Speaker 2>them what doesn't work for them. My brother always used

1:19:32.360 --> 1:19:34.519
<v Speaker 2>to say that the most important internship he ever had

1:19:34.560 --> 1:19:37.560
<v Speaker 2>was the one he hated the most, because he realized

1:19:37.960 --> 1:19:39.599
<v Speaker 2>he thought he wanted to be a geneticist. He got

1:19:39.640 --> 1:19:43.000
<v Speaker 2>this like plumb post as a researcher on fig wasps

1:19:43.040 --> 1:19:46.559
<v Speaker 2>of all things, hated every minute of it. Now he's

1:19:46.560 --> 1:19:49.000
<v Speaker 2>a doctor and loves it. But it was because he

1:19:49.080 --> 1:19:51.519
<v Speaker 2>listened to that feedback in his own experience and said

1:19:51.560 --> 1:19:53.760
<v Speaker 2>you know this is not for me, so you know,

1:19:54.000 --> 1:19:57.800
<v Speaker 2>really go out try things and take notes about what

1:19:57.840 --> 1:19:59.000
<v Speaker 2>you like and what you don't like, and then that

1:19:59.000 --> 1:19:59.960
<v Speaker 2>will help you make better decison.

1:20:00.479 --> 1:20:03.040
<v Speaker 1>And our final question, what do you know about the

1:20:03.080 --> 1:20:09.160
<v Speaker 1>world of chaos, theory, causation, the butterfly effect today you

1:20:09.200 --> 1:20:11.080
<v Speaker 1>wish you knew twenty or so years ago.

1:20:12.120 --> 1:20:13.920
<v Speaker 2>Well, I like, you know, one of the things is

1:20:13.960 --> 1:20:16.000
<v Speaker 2>that I'm derived from mass murder, because I didn't know

1:20:16.040 --> 1:20:18.880
<v Speaker 2>that previously, but I will say that, you know, I

1:20:18.880 --> 1:20:21.160
<v Speaker 2>think that navigating uncertainty is one of those things that

1:20:21.200 --> 1:20:24.800
<v Speaker 2>I used to think was only something that we should

1:20:24.800 --> 1:20:28.040
<v Speaker 2>try to slay and tame. What I like to appreciate now,

1:20:28.080 --> 1:20:29.640
<v Speaker 2>and I write about some of the philosophy of this

1:20:29.720 --> 1:20:31.960
<v Speaker 2>in fluke is. I actually think uncertainty can be a

1:20:31.960 --> 1:20:35.559
<v Speaker 2>really wonderful thing, and you just have to sometimes accept

1:20:35.600 --> 1:20:38.880
<v Speaker 2>it and then navigate based on the understanding that there

1:20:38.960 --> 1:20:42.880
<v Speaker 2>is radical uncertainty that we can't eliminate, and that is

1:20:42.920 --> 1:20:45.879
<v Speaker 2>where some of the best flukes in life come from.

1:20:45.920 --> 1:20:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Really very fascinating. Thank you, Brian for being so generous

1:20:49.200 --> 1:20:52.479
<v Speaker 1>with your time. We have been speaking with Brian Klass,

1:20:52.720 --> 1:20:56.839
<v Speaker 1>Professor of Global Politics at University College London and author

1:20:56.920 --> 1:21:00.439
<v Speaker 1>of the new book Fluke, Chance, Chaos and Why Everything

1:21:00.479 --> 1:21:04.280
<v Speaker 1>We Do Matters. If you enjoy this conversation, well be

1:21:04.320 --> 1:21:07.120
<v Speaker 1>sure and check out any of the five hundred previous

1:21:07.160 --> 1:21:10.000
<v Speaker 1>discussions we've had over the past ten years. You can

1:21:10.040 --> 1:21:14.200
<v Speaker 1>find those at iTunes, Spotify, YouTube, wherever you find your

1:21:14.240 --> 1:21:18.479
<v Speaker 1>favorite podcast. Check out my new podcast at the Money

1:21:18.960 --> 1:21:21.680
<v Speaker 1>once a week, a quick discussion with an expert on

1:21:21.720 --> 1:21:25.719
<v Speaker 1>a subject that matters to investors. You can find those

1:21:25.800 --> 1:21:28.840
<v Speaker 1>in the Masters of Business feed. Sign up for my

1:21:28.960 --> 1:21:31.360
<v Speaker 1>daily reading list at ridults dot com. Follow me on

1:21:31.400 --> 1:21:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at rit Alts. Follow the full family of Bloomberg

1:21:35.520 --> 1:21:39.680
<v Speaker 1>podcasts at podcast I would be remiss if I did

1:21:39.680 --> 1:21:42.360
<v Speaker 1>not thank the correct team that puts these conversations together

1:21:42.439 --> 1:21:45.840
<v Speaker 1>each week. Kaylie Lapara is my audio engineer, A Tick

1:21:45.880 --> 1:21:49.960
<v Speaker 1>of Albrun is my project manager, Sean Russo is my researcher,

1:21:50.080 --> 1:21:53.720
<v Speaker 1>and A Luke is my producer. I'm Barry Hults. You've

1:21:53.720 --> 1:21:58.840
<v Speaker 1>been listening to Masters and Business on Bloomberg Radio.