1 00:00:01,280 --> 00:00:01,960 Speaker 1: The volume. 2 00:00:15,520 --> 00:00:17,440 Speaker 2: All right, welcome to hoopsina I here at the volume 3 00:00:17,480 --> 00:00:18,079 Speaker 2: Heavy Friday. 4 00:00:18,079 --> 00:00:18,439 Speaker 1: Everybody. 5 00:00:18,520 --> 00:00:20,200 Speaker 2: Hope all of you guys had a great week. Got 6 00:00:20,200 --> 00:00:22,840 Speaker 2: a jam pack show for you guys today. It's Mailbag Today, 7 00:00:23,120 --> 00:00:25,360 Speaker 2: Mailbag Day, and we got so many good questions from 8 00:00:25,400 --> 00:00:28,800 Speaker 2: you guys. A lot of questions surrounding Kevin Durant and 9 00:00:28,840 --> 00:00:32,519 Speaker 2: the Houston Rockets some of their big picture potential this year. 10 00:00:32,560 --> 00:00:35,600 Speaker 2: I really want to do a deep dive into KD 11 00:00:35,760 --> 00:00:38,520 Speaker 2: and the Rockets today. After that, I got a couple 12 00:00:38,600 --> 00:00:42,560 Speaker 2: of really interesting questions surrounding Donovan Mitchell, including a question 13 00:00:42,600 --> 00:00:44,640 Speaker 2: as to whether or not Donovan should be ranked ahead 14 00:00:44,640 --> 00:00:46,480 Speaker 2: of a guy like Lebron. So we're gonna dig into 15 00:00:46,479 --> 00:00:49,320 Speaker 2: that a little bit. There's some big picture stuff with 16 00:00:49,520 --> 00:00:54,200 Speaker 2: like Lebron versus Steph in the recent history versus all time. 17 00:00:54,600 --> 00:00:59,320 Speaker 2: We've got questions surrounding some theoretical Los Angeles Lakers trades, 18 00:00:59,360 --> 00:01:01,440 Speaker 2: all sorts of interesting stuff to get into today. You 19 00:01:01,480 --> 00:01:03,160 Speaker 2: guys know the job before we get started. To subscribe 20 00:01:03,200 --> 00:01:05,280 Speaker 2: to the Hoops Tonight YouTube channel so you don't miss 21 00:01:05,280 --> 00:01:07,480 Speaker 2: any more of our videos. Follow me on Twitter, Underscore 22 00:01:07,520 --> 00:01:10,040 Speaker 2: JCNLT So you guys don't miss show announcements, don't forget 23 00:01:10,080 --> 00:01:11,760 Speaker 2: a better podcast fee wherever you get your podcast on 24 00:01:11,800 --> 00:01:13,760 Speaker 2: our Hoops Tonight. It's also super helpful if you leave 25 00:01:13,800 --> 00:01:15,800 Speaker 2: your rating and a review on that front. Jackson is 26 00:01:15,800 --> 00:01:17,959 Speaker 2: doing great work on our social media feeds on Twitter, Instagram, 27 00:01:18,040 --> 00:01:20,039 Speaker 2: Facebook and TikTok. Make sure you guys follow us there 28 00:01:20,280 --> 00:01:21,520 Speaker 2: and the last, but not least, if you want to 29 00:01:21,560 --> 00:01:23,800 Speaker 2: get a question into this mail bag, all you gotta 30 00:01:23,800 --> 00:01:26,520 Speaker 2: do is go to our full episodes on YouTube and 31 00:01:26,720 --> 00:01:29,679 Speaker 2: in the comments drop mail bag with a colon and 32 00:01:29,720 --> 00:01:32,720 Speaker 2: then write your question. You're gonna ask questions about absolutely 33 00:01:32,760 --> 00:01:35,520 Speaker 2: anything to get into the mail bag. We're also highlighting, 34 00:01:35,560 --> 00:01:39,440 Speaker 2: specifically in this series questions that are related to the 35 00:01:39,440 --> 00:01:42,040 Speaker 2: player rankings list. I'm gonna try to get to several 36 00:01:42,080 --> 00:01:45,959 Speaker 2: of those in here as well. So you disagree with 37 00:01:46,120 --> 00:01:47,920 Speaker 2: where I have a guy ranked. You think he's too high, 38 00:01:47,960 --> 00:01:50,040 Speaker 2: I think he's too low. Just tell me where you 39 00:01:50,040 --> 00:01:52,480 Speaker 2: think you should be ranked, explain why, give a little 40 00:01:52,520 --> 00:01:55,000 Speaker 2: elevator pitch, and we'll get into those debates in our 41 00:01:55,000 --> 00:01:57,400 Speaker 2: Friday mail bags as well. All right, let's talk some basketball. 42 00:01:57,480 --> 00:02:01,800 Speaker 2: So first question, I have been feeling that the Rockets 43 00:02:01,840 --> 00:02:06,840 Speaker 2: aren't real contenders for an overly simplistic reason. KD is 44 00:02:06,920 --> 00:02:09,200 Speaker 2: too old. When is the last time we saw a 45 00:02:09,200 --> 00:02:11,320 Speaker 2: player as old as KD be the best player on 46 00:02:11,320 --> 00:02:14,560 Speaker 2: a championship team. Lebron in twenty twenty was two years 47 00:02:14,600 --> 00:02:18,160 Speaker 2: younger than KD will be by next year's playoffs. You 48 00:02:18,200 --> 00:02:20,480 Speaker 2: have to go back over forty years to Careem Abdul 49 00:02:20,520 --> 00:02:22,880 Speaker 2: Jabbar in nineteen eighty five to find a guy at 50 00:02:22,960 --> 00:02:25,440 Speaker 2: least as old as KD is now so on a 51 00:02:25,520 --> 00:02:28,840 Speaker 2: championship team, and it's two guys are widely considered to 52 00:02:28,880 --> 00:02:30,520 Speaker 2: be two of the top three players of all time 53 00:02:30,680 --> 00:02:33,680 Speaker 2: in Lebron in Kareem Abdul Jabbar. I just don't see 54 00:02:33,760 --> 00:02:37,480 Speaker 2: KD being that third guy to accomplish this feat. But 55 00:02:37,560 --> 00:02:41,000 Speaker 2: is this too simplistic? Also, you don't have him ranked 56 00:02:41,000 --> 00:02:43,560 Speaker 2: as a top ten player, and it's exceedingly rare to 57 00:02:43,600 --> 00:02:46,080 Speaker 2: win a chip without a top ten player. So this 58 00:02:46,120 --> 00:02:47,960 Speaker 2: is actually a really interesting topic to me as it 59 00:02:48,000 --> 00:02:52,399 Speaker 2: pertains to the age of Kevin Durant. How much can 60 00:02:52,400 --> 00:02:56,160 Speaker 2: he help their offense really and is there any sort 61 00:02:56,160 --> 00:02:58,000 Speaker 2: of precedent for this sort of thing? 62 00:02:58,280 --> 00:02:58,520 Speaker 1: Right? 63 00:02:59,000 --> 00:03:00,880 Speaker 2: And I was actually getting in to the Rockets quite 64 00:03:00,919 --> 00:03:03,600 Speaker 2: a bit. I was having dinner over at Adam Mars's 65 00:03:03,600 --> 00:03:05,240 Speaker 2: house the other night. You know, he covers the Nuggets. 66 00:03:05,240 --> 00:03:06,919 Speaker 2: And we just moved up here to Denver, and Adam 67 00:03:07,160 --> 00:03:08,960 Speaker 2: and his wife have been super kind to my wife 68 00:03:08,960 --> 00:03:11,320 Speaker 2: and I helping us feel welcomed as we moved to 69 00:03:11,360 --> 00:03:13,079 Speaker 2: a brand new city. As you can imagine, it's kind 70 00:03:13,080 --> 00:03:16,639 Speaker 2: of scary and a little bit lonely at times when 71 00:03:16,680 --> 00:03:18,760 Speaker 2: you uproot your life and you move up to a 72 00:03:18,760 --> 00:03:21,760 Speaker 2: completely different area, right, And Adam's just been Adam and 73 00:03:21,800 --> 00:03:23,280 Speaker 2: his family have just been super kind to us. 74 00:03:23,320 --> 00:03:23,720 Speaker 1: But it was fun. 75 00:03:23,720 --> 00:03:25,360 Speaker 2: We were just sitting out on his patio and looking 76 00:03:25,360 --> 00:03:27,880 Speaker 2: at the Rocky mountains and talking some hoops and we 77 00:03:27,880 --> 00:03:30,440 Speaker 2: were shooting the shit about the Rockets. And one of 78 00:03:30,520 --> 00:03:33,320 Speaker 2: the things that we were getting into is this idea 79 00:03:34,040 --> 00:03:39,240 Speaker 2: of how good can the Rockets get on offense? Really right, 80 00:03:39,280 --> 00:03:42,000 Speaker 2: because if you, on the one hand, if you follow 81 00:03:42,040 --> 00:03:46,360 Speaker 2: a very simple logical pathway, this was an awesome team 82 00:03:46,440 --> 00:03:47,000 Speaker 2: last year. 83 00:03:47,800 --> 00:03:49,000 Speaker 1: And they were awesome. 84 00:03:48,600 --> 00:03:51,640 Speaker 2: Because they were incredible on defense, and they used that 85 00:03:51,760 --> 00:03:54,840 Speaker 2: defense to get out and transition to score enough on offense, 86 00:03:55,320 --> 00:03:56,520 Speaker 2: and they did just enough. 87 00:03:56,560 --> 00:03:57,680 Speaker 1: With Alpern Shangun and. 88 00:03:57,600 --> 00:04:00,800 Speaker 2: Fred van Vliet to be able to win basketball games, 89 00:04:00,840 --> 00:04:04,120 Speaker 2: and they lock down the second seed in an incredibly 90 00:04:04,200 --> 00:04:09,920 Speaker 2: tough Western Conference. Their offense was abysmal in the half court. 91 00:04:10,400 --> 00:04:12,920 Speaker 2: They ranked twenty second and half court offense last year 92 00:04:12,920 --> 00:04:15,640 Speaker 2: according to Cleaning the Glass. That's kind of an insane 93 00:04:15,720 --> 00:04:17,400 Speaker 2: stat if you think about it, for a team that 94 00:04:17,480 --> 00:04:20,320 Speaker 2: was a two seed in that crazy Western Conference to 95 00:04:20,400 --> 00:04:23,760 Speaker 2: be twenty second and half court offensive rating again according 96 00:04:23,760 --> 00:04:26,680 Speaker 2: to Cleaning the Glass. So in theory, if you follow 97 00:04:26,760 --> 00:04:30,360 Speaker 2: like a basic logical pathway, you add Kevin Durant to 98 00:04:30,360 --> 00:04:33,719 Speaker 2: that situation, you substantially improve your biggest weakness and you 99 00:04:33,760 --> 00:04:35,240 Speaker 2: become a much better basketball team. 100 00:04:35,360 --> 00:04:35,520 Speaker 1: Right. 101 00:04:35,560 --> 00:04:37,160 Speaker 2: I mean, even if you look at the defense, and 102 00:04:37,320 --> 00:04:39,960 Speaker 2: I think a lot of people are rightfully talking about 103 00:04:39,960 --> 00:04:42,880 Speaker 2: how Dylan Brooks is a substantial loss, but I think 104 00:04:42,920 --> 00:04:45,120 Speaker 2: KD is a very good defender. He's different than Dylan. 105 00:04:45,160 --> 00:04:46,840 Speaker 2: He's not a guy that you're gonna put on the 106 00:04:46,880 --> 00:04:50,000 Speaker 2: opposing team's best player all game. But he improves their 107 00:04:50,000 --> 00:04:52,400 Speaker 2: back line defense. He provides a level of length they 108 00:04:52,400 --> 00:04:54,720 Speaker 2: don't really have in their starting lineup, and he can 109 00:04:54,760 --> 00:04:56,880 Speaker 2: switch onto different positions as well, and is actually a 110 00:04:57,000 --> 00:04:58,880 Speaker 2: very good perimeter defender. We were talking about in the 111 00:04:58,920 --> 00:05:02,799 Speaker 2: KD ranking video how good he is defending on an island. 112 00:05:02,920 --> 00:05:04,960 Speaker 2: So I think Houston is going to be an incredible 113 00:05:05,000 --> 00:05:09,039 Speaker 2: defense again. So in theory, Katie makes them so much better, 114 00:05:09,160 --> 00:05:12,480 Speaker 2: right because he addresses that need. But I do think 115 00:05:12,520 --> 00:05:15,719 Speaker 2: it is a bit more complicated than that, for the record, 116 00:05:16,200 --> 00:05:19,200 Speaker 2: for you any further, I still see Houston as a 117 00:05:19,200 --> 00:05:22,240 Speaker 2: top tier contender in the Western Conference. In that group 118 00:05:22,279 --> 00:05:25,479 Speaker 2: of three with Denver and Oklahoma City and Houston, I 119 00:05:25,560 --> 00:05:28,000 Speaker 2: view them firmly in that tier. But the things that 120 00:05:28,040 --> 00:05:30,120 Speaker 2: I'm about to explain are why I view them as 121 00:05:30,160 --> 00:05:34,279 Speaker 2: a clear third place or a third like third most 122 00:05:34,520 --> 00:05:37,760 Speaker 2: likely to actually get out of the conference because of 123 00:05:37,800 --> 00:05:41,719 Speaker 2: the question marks surrounding them. Offense is a lot more 124 00:05:41,760 --> 00:05:47,960 Speaker 2: complicated than defense continuity matters. You have to learn how 125 00:05:47,960 --> 00:05:52,599 Speaker 2: to play together. Denver added some guys, but they're going 126 00:05:52,680 --> 00:05:55,240 Speaker 2: to be playing the same style of offense with the 127 00:05:55,279 --> 00:05:57,680 Speaker 2: same core players that they've been playing with for over 128 00:05:57,760 --> 00:06:01,400 Speaker 2: a half decade now. Offense is going to come easy 129 00:06:01,440 --> 00:06:06,279 Speaker 2: for Denver this year. Okloma City's offense has some cracks 130 00:06:06,279 --> 00:06:10,040 Speaker 2: in it, sure, but they're basically running it back again 131 00:06:10,120 --> 00:06:13,919 Speaker 2: with the same dudes play in the same way for 132 00:06:14,080 --> 00:06:19,000 Speaker 2: the third consecutive year. And while I view Kevin Durant 133 00:06:19,000 --> 00:06:21,320 Speaker 2: as one of the better offensive players in the league, 134 00:06:21,560 --> 00:06:26,040 Speaker 2: he's not what I would call a traditional offensive engine, 135 00:06:26,800 --> 00:06:30,279 Speaker 2: a guy whose specialty it is to just make five 136 00:06:30,360 --> 00:06:33,599 Speaker 2: man offense flow and be super easy. He's a scorer. 137 00:06:34,279 --> 00:06:37,520 Speaker 2: He's one of the very best ever. But he's a scorer. 138 00:06:38,160 --> 00:06:41,200 Speaker 2: He's the guy who takes a good offense and makes 139 00:06:41,200 --> 00:06:44,840 Speaker 2: it elite. And it's just about roles, right like that 140 00:06:45,560 --> 00:06:51,360 Speaker 2: there's a certain diminishing return when you have offensive engine types. 141 00:06:51,400 --> 00:06:53,600 Speaker 2: I've talked about this, like if you wanted to theoretically 142 00:06:53,680 --> 00:06:56,920 Speaker 2: pair a Luca with a Chris Paul in his prime, 143 00:06:57,000 --> 00:07:00,760 Speaker 2: or with a you know, with a Nikoli, Right Like, 144 00:07:00,880 --> 00:07:04,200 Speaker 2: there's a diminishing return when you have multiple of those 145 00:07:04,240 --> 00:07:07,039 Speaker 2: offensive engine types. But like a lot of those kinds 146 00:07:07,040 --> 00:07:10,320 Speaker 2: of guys aren't gonna be the elite shot makers. That 147 00:07:10,360 --> 00:07:13,000 Speaker 2: are the types of dudes that lift good offenses into 148 00:07:13,000 --> 00:07:16,000 Speaker 2: elite offenses, Right Like, this is a unique trait that 149 00:07:16,120 --> 00:07:20,440 Speaker 2: Kevin Durant has. He made the Golden State Warriors unbeatable 150 00:07:20,480 --> 00:07:22,920 Speaker 2: when he was there because they already had an engine 151 00:07:22,920 --> 00:07:27,240 Speaker 2: in Steah. They were already in a great offense, and 152 00:07:27,280 --> 00:07:30,720 Speaker 2: he took them from being that to being all time great, 153 00:07:31,000 --> 00:07:34,200 Speaker 2: like the possibly the greatest offense of all time. Right 154 00:07:34,240 --> 00:07:37,000 Speaker 2: that that's what Kevin Durant did to that group. So 155 00:07:37,240 --> 00:07:40,720 Speaker 2: like I do think Kevin Durant obviously makes the Rockets 156 00:07:40,760 --> 00:07:43,840 Speaker 2: a better offense, the question is will he be able 157 00:07:43,880 --> 00:07:49,920 Speaker 2: to improve their offense enough? Like this is more complicated 158 00:07:50,320 --> 00:07:56,160 Speaker 2: than just KD graded offense equals Houston graded offense. I mean, 159 00:07:56,200 --> 00:07:59,760 Speaker 2: guys like I see similar issues with the Los Angeles Lakers, 160 00:07:59,760 --> 00:08:04,520 Speaker 2: and they have substantially more offensive talent. They're not surrounding, 161 00:08:05,280 --> 00:08:08,920 Speaker 2: you know, Luca with a bunch of defensive specialists the 162 00:08:08,960 --> 00:08:12,040 Speaker 2: way that Houston is going to be surrounding Kevin Durant 163 00:08:12,080 --> 00:08:15,960 Speaker 2: with the Lakers have a shit ton of offensive talent, 164 00:08:16,720 --> 00:08:20,160 Speaker 2: and yet they went through extended stretches both in the 165 00:08:20,200 --> 00:08:24,400 Speaker 2: regular season with Luca and in the Timberwolve series last year, 166 00:08:24,600 --> 00:08:28,080 Speaker 2: or they didn't look like a good offense because it 167 00:08:28,120 --> 00:08:34,040 Speaker 2: takes time and effort that continuity builds naturally for you 168 00:08:34,120 --> 00:08:38,440 Speaker 2: to become a good offense even with high level offensive pieces. 169 00:08:39,920 --> 00:08:43,520 Speaker 2: Houston does not have an elite offensive player. Now excuse me, 170 00:08:43,559 --> 00:08:48,360 Speaker 2: an laite offensive roster. They added an elite offensive player. 171 00:08:49,200 --> 00:08:51,319 Speaker 2: They added some shooting, like I think Dorian Pinney Smith 172 00:08:51,360 --> 00:08:54,040 Speaker 2: is gonna help. But it's going to be a process. 173 00:08:55,559 --> 00:08:59,040 Speaker 2: How all of this works out for Houston, how this 174 00:08:59,200 --> 00:09:02,959 Speaker 2: season goes for them will depend on what level they 175 00:09:02,960 --> 00:09:04,679 Speaker 2: can get to on offense. Does he make them a 176 00:09:04,720 --> 00:09:08,360 Speaker 2: little bit better that's not gonna be enough. Does he 177 00:09:08,440 --> 00:09:11,640 Speaker 2: make them a lot better. That's where they could end 178 00:09:11,720 --> 00:09:14,719 Speaker 2: up reaching their ultimate goals and competing for a championship. 179 00:09:15,200 --> 00:09:16,840 Speaker 2: I think a big part of the job is gonna 180 00:09:16,840 --> 00:09:19,480 Speaker 2: be figuring out how to turn the attention that KD 181 00:09:19,760 --> 00:09:23,640 Speaker 2: draws into easy offense for the rest of the guys. Essentially, 182 00:09:23,640 --> 00:09:26,840 Speaker 2: what I'm saying is having KD function more as an 183 00:09:26,840 --> 00:09:30,200 Speaker 2: offensive engine than as a score all the time. 184 00:09:31,000 --> 00:09:32,600 Speaker 1: I think if KD. 185 00:09:32,600 --> 00:09:35,360 Speaker 2: Just plays in the mud, one on one basketball against 186 00:09:35,400 --> 00:09:39,560 Speaker 2: aggressive help, over and over and over again, I think 187 00:09:39,600 --> 00:09:45,319 Speaker 2: that could lead to some disappointing results. But think about 188 00:09:45,320 --> 00:09:49,559 Speaker 2: it from the perspective of opponent game plans, Katie's gonna 189 00:09:49,640 --> 00:09:53,480 Speaker 2: draw a lot of attention. Like if you're coaching against 190 00:09:53,480 --> 00:09:55,120 Speaker 2: the Houston Rockets, says here, what are you gonna do 191 00:09:55,120 --> 00:09:59,880 Speaker 2: from the standpoint of your game plan. You're gonna overplay KD, 192 00:10:00,800 --> 00:10:03,640 Speaker 2: and you're gonna overplay the paint. You're gonna try to 193 00:10:03,679 --> 00:10:05,680 Speaker 2: get the ball out of his hands, and you're gonna 194 00:10:05,679 --> 00:10:09,600 Speaker 2: try to concede decent catch and shoot looks to mediocre 195 00:10:09,679 --> 00:10:12,720 Speaker 2: jump shooters. That's what every team is gonna try to do. 196 00:10:14,360 --> 00:10:17,880 Speaker 2: So the key will be taking advantage of Kd's unique 197 00:10:17,880 --> 00:10:22,480 Speaker 2: ability to invert spacing. Kade was the best jump shooter 198 00:10:22,480 --> 00:10:24,240 Speaker 2: in basketball last year. We talked about that in his 199 00:10:24,320 --> 00:10:29,240 Speaker 2: ranking episode. He's gonna come off of wide pin downs 200 00:10:29,280 --> 00:10:31,319 Speaker 2: and he's gonna draw a second player to the level. 201 00:10:31,520 --> 00:10:33,800 Speaker 2: He's gonna come off of ball screens on the ball 202 00:10:33,960 --> 00:10:36,400 Speaker 2: and he's gonna draw two to the ball. And that 203 00:10:36,520 --> 00:10:40,200 Speaker 2: sort of thing, that specific ability to bring multiple defenders 204 00:10:40,240 --> 00:10:43,840 Speaker 2: out to the perimeter, that can be used to turn 205 00:10:44,320 --> 00:10:49,000 Speaker 2: all of that overhelp into dunks not threes. 206 00:10:51,120 --> 00:10:52,040 Speaker 1: If the big man. 207 00:10:52,200 --> 00:10:55,360 Speaker 2: Think of it, just from a very basic basketball geometry, 208 00:10:55,840 --> 00:10:58,559 Speaker 2: Kevin Durant comes off of a ball screen, the big 209 00:10:58,600 --> 00:11:01,240 Speaker 2: man shows up at the level, you have two on KD. 210 00:11:01,720 --> 00:11:05,000 Speaker 2: His man rolls out of it. Who's now accountable for 211 00:11:05,080 --> 00:11:08,680 Speaker 2: that man? The lowman. Right, the lowman is typically guarding 212 00:11:08,720 --> 00:11:10,840 Speaker 2: the guy in the weak side corner. He's going to 213 00:11:10,880 --> 00:11:15,720 Speaker 2: be stepping over to guard that role man. Who's the 214 00:11:15,760 --> 00:11:19,439 Speaker 2: next helper in that line? If they on ball, guy's 215 00:11:19,480 --> 00:11:22,160 Speaker 2: on the ball and the screen defender is showing on 216 00:11:22,240 --> 00:11:25,920 Speaker 2: the ball and the lowman is tagging the roller, the 217 00:11:25,960 --> 00:11:29,360 Speaker 2: next guy in the rotation is literally going to be 218 00:11:29,400 --> 00:11:33,040 Speaker 2: the guy up on the wing. It's it's easy to 219 00:11:33,080 --> 00:11:36,960 Speaker 2: get behind that guy. There are dunks to be had there. 220 00:11:37,720 --> 00:11:39,520 Speaker 2: That's what the Golden State Warriors have been doing to 221 00:11:39,559 --> 00:11:41,599 Speaker 2: teams with high steph pick and roll for years and 222 00:11:41,679 --> 00:11:44,800 Speaker 2: years and years, turning that two on the ball sequence 223 00:11:44,800 --> 00:11:48,760 Speaker 2: into dunks. So now just this is where you gotta 224 00:11:48,800 --> 00:11:52,720 Speaker 2: take advantage of a men Thompson's versatility, because now imagine 225 00:11:52,800 --> 00:11:55,720 Speaker 2: whether it's shanng Goon setting the pick and him short 226 00:11:55,800 --> 00:11:59,640 Speaker 2: rolling in a men Thompson working the baseline or a 227 00:11:59,679 --> 00:12:04,760 Speaker 2: mental screening and rolling and Shangun working the baseline. It's 228 00:12:04,800 --> 00:12:08,760 Speaker 2: going to be pivotal that they establish timing. And this 229 00:12:08,840 --> 00:12:10,720 Speaker 2: is what is gonna take time. This is what the 230 00:12:10,760 --> 00:12:15,720 Speaker 2: continuity brings. Through thousands of reps, you can get to 231 00:12:15,760 --> 00:12:19,800 Speaker 2: the point where you have that timing down pat and 232 00:12:19,840 --> 00:12:22,480 Speaker 2: you can try to set up the floor so that 233 00:12:22,559 --> 00:12:25,600 Speaker 2: a men's working the baseline or Shangun's working the baseline, 234 00:12:25,600 --> 00:12:28,440 Speaker 2: and the other is in the short roll spot and 235 00:12:28,480 --> 00:12:32,080 Speaker 2: it's you know, someone like Dorian Phinney Smith on the wing. 236 00:12:33,320 --> 00:12:36,320 Speaker 2: That's the kind of option where it's like, Okay, now 237 00:12:37,040 --> 00:12:40,280 Speaker 2: we're using a men not spacing the floor, but as 238 00:12:40,320 --> 00:12:43,680 Speaker 2: a dunker, we're using Shane Gun whoever it is. One 239 00:12:43,679 --> 00:12:45,800 Speaker 2: of them is a dunker and the other as a 240 00:12:45,920 --> 00:12:48,920 Speaker 2: decision maker in the middle of the floor. And the 241 00:12:49,120 --> 00:12:51,600 Speaker 2: only three point shooter you can tilt it to is 242 00:12:51,640 --> 00:12:54,880 Speaker 2: gonna be a you know, a Fred van Vliet or 243 00:12:55,040 --> 00:12:59,240 Speaker 2: a Dorian Phinney Smith. Better options than in the past 244 00:13:00,080 --> 00:13:02,600 Speaker 2: it was Dylan Brooks right Like, it's one of those 245 00:13:02,640 --> 00:13:07,520 Speaker 2: things where that geometry setting up that flow, getting the 246 00:13:07,600 --> 00:13:10,600 Speaker 2: timing down so that they can go bang bang bang, 247 00:13:10,720 --> 00:13:13,520 Speaker 2: dunk bang bang bang, wide open corner three for Dorian 248 00:13:13,520 --> 00:13:16,720 Speaker 2: Phiney Smith. You know, like that sort of that sort 249 00:13:16,760 --> 00:13:19,920 Speaker 2: of sequencing is going to be what breaks this offense 250 00:13:20,000 --> 00:13:22,680 Speaker 2: open into being elite again. 251 00:13:22,880 --> 00:13:23,760 Speaker 1: I think that's gonna be. 252 00:13:23,840 --> 00:13:26,520 Speaker 2: That's why I've been advocating so much for like a 253 00:13:26,559 --> 00:13:29,520 Speaker 2: substantial increase in Kevin Durant pick and rolls this year. 254 00:13:30,640 --> 00:13:34,000 Speaker 2: I think, you know, Kevin Durant's not necessarily the highest 255 00:13:34,080 --> 00:13:37,040 Speaker 2: level pick and roll player in the world, but that 256 00:13:37,120 --> 00:13:39,880 Speaker 2: allows him to draw his attention further away from the basket. 257 00:13:41,160 --> 00:13:43,520 Speaker 2: In the event that you work more out of KD 258 00:13:43,800 --> 00:13:45,920 Speaker 2: in the high post or in the low posts in 259 00:13:46,000 --> 00:13:51,440 Speaker 2: ISO situations or post ups. In those situations, Kd's going 260 00:13:51,480 --> 00:13:54,960 Speaker 2: to draw the double teams closer to the basket. The 261 00:13:55,080 --> 00:13:57,960 Speaker 2: closer the double team is to the basket, the easier 262 00:13:58,000 --> 00:14:01,079 Speaker 2: it is to force it to become a ree for somebody. 263 00:14:01,840 --> 00:14:04,880 Speaker 2: The more double teams that Kadie draws twenty five feet 264 00:14:04,960 --> 00:14:08,679 Speaker 2: from the basket, the more dunks and layups you're going 265 00:14:08,720 --> 00:14:11,760 Speaker 2: to generate, which obviously are going to suit an athletic 266 00:14:12,200 --> 00:14:15,080 Speaker 2: Houston Rockets team that doesn't necessarily shoot the ball super well, 267 00:14:15,240 --> 00:14:18,000 Speaker 2: that's what's going to suit them more so, again, I 268 00:14:18,320 --> 00:14:22,680 Speaker 2: think figuring out that progression, figuring out that timing, making 269 00:14:22,720 --> 00:14:25,760 Speaker 2: sure that your off ball offensive players are playing in 270 00:14:25,800 --> 00:14:30,280 Speaker 2: a spot where they're most comfortable rather than when they're uncomfortable. 271 00:14:30,840 --> 00:14:32,120 Speaker 1: If you screw it up. 272 00:14:32,000 --> 00:14:35,800 Speaker 2: To where men Thompson's catching more in the short corner 273 00:14:36,200 --> 00:14:42,440 Speaker 2: corner wing that's going to lead to lesser returns with 274 00:14:42,480 --> 00:14:45,840 Speaker 2: this particular offense. So yeah, I think the easiest way 275 00:14:45,840 --> 00:14:49,000 Speaker 2: that I could explain it is Houston from a pure 276 00:14:49,080 --> 00:14:51,960 Speaker 2: talent perspective is right up in there with that tier 277 00:14:53,360 --> 00:14:56,760 Speaker 2: Denver and Oklahoma City you're on. But there are clearly 278 00:14:56,800 --> 00:14:59,160 Speaker 2: some bigger question marks for them than there are for 279 00:14:59,240 --> 00:15:02,120 Speaker 2: other teams, lighter range of potential outcomes for them on 280 00:15:02,160 --> 00:15:05,080 Speaker 2: the offensive end of the floor, And where Houston ends 281 00:15:05,120 --> 00:15:07,840 Speaker 2: up this year will come down to how those particular 282 00:15:07,920 --> 00:15:10,000 Speaker 2: question marks pan out. Now to the other two parts 283 00:15:10,000 --> 00:15:14,440 Speaker 2: of your question, though, how does Katie's age factor into 284 00:15:14,480 --> 00:15:17,920 Speaker 2: all of this? It entirely depends on how they play. 285 00:15:18,800 --> 00:15:21,400 Speaker 1: Again. If they play ugly, grind. 286 00:15:21,080 --> 00:15:25,120 Speaker 2: Out basketball, and Katie kind of insists on playing more 287 00:15:25,200 --> 00:15:27,680 Speaker 2: like he did in Phoenix, lower volume pick and roll, 288 00:15:27,760 --> 00:15:33,360 Speaker 2: higher volume mid post, iso base up stuff that's brute 289 00:15:33,360 --> 00:15:35,680 Speaker 2: force basketball, and I could see him wearing down a 290 00:15:35,680 --> 00:15:39,240 Speaker 2: little bit just because they'll need so much of him 291 00:15:39,760 --> 00:15:42,280 Speaker 2: in that spot in order to be successful in offense, 292 00:15:42,320 --> 00:15:44,400 Speaker 2: and that's just a lot. But if they can figure 293 00:15:44,440 --> 00:15:47,920 Speaker 2: out more ways to use the attention he draws to 294 00:15:48,000 --> 00:15:52,120 Speaker 2: initiate offense again, more double teams further from the basket, 295 00:15:52,280 --> 00:15:57,359 Speaker 2: or aggressive shows at the level coverages further from the basket. 296 00:15:57,880 --> 00:16:00,000 Speaker 2: That's where you can find ways to kind of like 297 00:16:00,160 --> 00:16:04,760 Speaker 2: turn the way he's guarded into points rather than forcing 298 00:16:04,840 --> 00:16:08,320 Speaker 2: him to really physically carry that load. And I think, 299 00:16:08,360 --> 00:16:10,720 Speaker 2: I think if they can figure that out, I don't 300 00:16:10,760 --> 00:16:13,160 Speaker 2: think his age will be a problem. Why because this 301 00:16:13,240 --> 00:16:16,520 Speaker 2: is a really young and athletic Houston team and they're 302 00:16:16,560 --> 00:16:19,320 Speaker 2: going to anchor him with so much size and athleticism 303 00:16:19,360 --> 00:16:21,040 Speaker 2: that you know, like even when we were talking about 304 00:16:21,080 --> 00:16:23,880 Speaker 2: Katie's rim pressure, Katie's rim pressure is going to factor 305 00:16:23,920 --> 00:16:27,240 Speaker 2: in for me when it comes to you know, the 306 00:16:27,280 --> 00:16:30,800 Speaker 2: player rankings list when we're talking about in a vacuum basketball. 307 00:16:31,200 --> 00:16:33,360 Speaker 2: But this team is going to generate so much rim 308 00:16:33,400 --> 00:16:36,560 Speaker 2: pressure in transition, and a men Thompson through his through 309 00:16:36,560 --> 00:16:40,040 Speaker 2: his ability to you know, just get by people and 310 00:16:40,120 --> 00:16:44,000 Speaker 2: to get aggressively closer to the basket, Alprin Shangun's power game, 311 00:16:44,040 --> 00:16:46,200 Speaker 2: like Newston is going to be fine on the on 312 00:16:46,240 --> 00:16:48,320 Speaker 2: the rim pressure find it's more just like the greasing 313 00:16:48,400 --> 00:16:52,040 Speaker 2: the wheels, creating advantages and making basketball easier for them. 314 00:16:52,280 --> 00:16:53,840 Speaker 2: That's the thing that I think KDE's going to be 315 00:16:53,880 --> 00:16:55,960 Speaker 2: able to help them with. It's kind of a unique 316 00:16:55,960 --> 00:16:58,680 Speaker 2: fit in that sense. But yeah, like I'm whether or 317 00:16:58,720 --> 00:17:01,480 Speaker 2: not Katie's age role is going to come down in 318 00:17:01,560 --> 00:17:04,879 Speaker 2: large part to how they play. Minutes per game I 319 00:17:04,880 --> 00:17:07,679 Speaker 2: think would also be a factor. Like Houston's an elite defense, 320 00:17:07,720 --> 00:17:09,800 Speaker 2: so they're going to be able to sit him for 321 00:17:10,119 --> 00:17:12,920 Speaker 2: sixteen minutes a game and still give themselves a great 322 00:17:12,960 --> 00:17:13,400 Speaker 2: chance to win. 323 00:17:13,440 --> 00:17:14,640 Speaker 1: That'll help in the regular. 324 00:17:14,359 --> 00:17:17,360 Speaker 2: Season, but especially when they get to the postseason, how 325 00:17:17,359 --> 00:17:19,159 Speaker 2: they play will be a factor because they will have 326 00:17:19,160 --> 00:17:22,119 Speaker 2: to ratchet as minutes up. And lastly, the part about 327 00:17:22,200 --> 00:17:25,560 Speaker 2: KDE ranking eleventh, when typically you need a top ten 328 00:17:25,600 --> 00:17:28,400 Speaker 2: player to win, I just don't think that's necessarily true. 329 00:17:28,440 --> 00:17:30,960 Speaker 2: I just think you need a superstar to win, and 330 00:17:31,640 --> 00:17:35,240 Speaker 2: KD is certainly a superstar. He's just in that second tier. 331 00:17:35,720 --> 00:17:38,120 Speaker 2: We're just in such a deep league now that if 332 00:17:38,200 --> 00:17:40,600 Speaker 2: Kawhi and Joel and Bid are healthy, we got fourteen 333 00:17:40,640 --> 00:17:44,200 Speaker 2: of those guys now. But I think KD is every 334 00:17:44,200 --> 00:17:46,320 Speaker 2: bit as good as everyone else that I have on 335 00:17:46,359 --> 00:17:48,800 Speaker 2: this list up to number five. That's where that kind 336 00:17:48,800 --> 00:17:51,159 Speaker 2: of line of demarcation is so I think KD is 337 00:17:51,280 --> 00:17:52,280 Speaker 2: plenty good enough. 338 00:17:53,040 --> 00:17:55,600 Speaker 1: It's just about what heights the team. 339 00:17:55,480 --> 00:17:57,480 Speaker 2: Can reach collectively, which is going to come in large 340 00:17:57,480 --> 00:18:00,600 Speaker 2: part down to what style do they choose to play 341 00:18:00,600 --> 00:18:03,760 Speaker 2: on offense and how well it all comes together on 342 00:18:03,800 --> 00:18:05,400 Speaker 2: that end of the floor in terms of their continuity 343 00:18:05,400 --> 00:18:10,399 Speaker 2: and how quickly they figure things out. Don't understand next question. 344 00:18:10,480 --> 00:18:13,159 Speaker 2: Don't understand some of your Donovan Mitchell arguments. He played 345 00:18:13,200 --> 00:18:15,520 Speaker 2: four less minutes per game than the year before, four 346 00:18:15,520 --> 00:18:17,960 Speaker 2: and a half minutes less than two years ago. That's 347 00:18:18,000 --> 00:18:20,960 Speaker 2: the main reason his total usage numbers were down. That's 348 00:18:21,119 --> 00:18:23,720 Speaker 2: just an eleven percent decrease in his minutes, and his 349 00:18:23,800 --> 00:18:27,080 Speaker 2: time of possession per game decreased by twenty two percent. 350 00:18:27,280 --> 00:18:31,360 Speaker 2: So I don't care about the minutes going down. By 351 00:18:31,400 --> 00:18:36,000 Speaker 2: all indications, even just watching the calves, Donovan Mitchell had 352 00:18:36,040 --> 00:18:39,840 Speaker 2: the ball less. He was clearly in a different role. 353 00:18:40,320 --> 00:18:42,840 Speaker 2: It wasn't simply just that his minutes were cut down. 354 00:18:43,000 --> 00:18:47,360 Speaker 2: He literally dropped in time of possession by almost a fourth. 355 00:18:47,720 --> 00:18:51,040 Speaker 2: That is a huge change and approach from Donovan Mitchell 356 00:18:51,119 --> 00:18:51,800 Speaker 2: year over year. 357 00:18:52,760 --> 00:18:53,320 Speaker 1: Next question. 358 00:18:53,920 --> 00:18:56,080 Speaker 2: I'm as big of a Lebron fan as anyone, but 359 00:18:56,119 --> 00:18:58,120 Speaker 2: I can't agree with him being higher on the list 360 00:18:58,119 --> 00:19:01,480 Speaker 2: than Donovan Mitchell. You mentioned, Lebron finished sixth and MVP voting, 361 00:19:01,480 --> 00:19:04,400 Speaker 2: while Mitchell finished hot five. Donovan Mitchell led his team 362 00:19:04,400 --> 00:19:06,600 Speaker 2: to the number one seed and statistically the second highest 363 00:19:06,680 --> 00:19:09,119 Speaker 2: rated offense of all time. Additionally, if this list is 364 00:19:09,160 --> 00:19:11,400 Speaker 2: based on the player you want from October to June, 365 00:19:11,480 --> 00:19:13,800 Speaker 2: then health has to matter. Spider played seventy one games 366 00:19:13,880 --> 00:19:16,680 Speaker 2: last season, was healthy going into the playoffs, and average thirty. 367 00:19:16,720 --> 00:19:18,800 Speaker 2: It seems unfair to blame anything on him regarding their 368 00:19:18,800 --> 00:19:21,480 Speaker 2: playoff run last season, seeing as he was without his 369 00:19:21,560 --> 00:19:24,960 Speaker 2: wingman and his secondary playmaker Garland for the entire playoffs, 370 00:19:25,000 --> 00:19:27,520 Speaker 2: and he still had a damn near fifty point game 371 00:19:27,760 --> 00:19:30,439 Speaker 2: and is a notorious playoff riser. Think back to the 372 00:19:30,440 --> 00:19:32,320 Speaker 2: bubble again. I love Lebron, but he hasn't been fully 373 00:19:32,359 --> 00:19:34,679 Speaker 2: healthy going into either of the last two playoffs, and 374 00:19:34,720 --> 00:19:36,480 Speaker 2: you wonder if he can maintain the intensity as a 375 00:19:36,520 --> 00:19:39,440 Speaker 2: primary secondary option for four series. It's tough to bank 376 00:19:39,480 --> 00:19:41,760 Speaker 2: on a fully healthy Lebron season through the playoffs, whereas 377 00:19:41,760 --> 00:19:44,679 Speaker 2: Spider is smacking his prime, So I'm taking him for 378 00:19:44,840 --> 00:19:48,480 Speaker 2: health and availability. Thanks and keep up the great work. 379 00:19:48,560 --> 00:19:50,240 Speaker 2: Best basketball in the game. Thank you so much for 380 00:19:50,240 --> 00:19:51,720 Speaker 2: the kind words. We're going to really dive into this 381 00:19:51,760 --> 00:19:55,679 Speaker 2: one because I think it's an interesting debate, the rivalries, 382 00:19:55,720 --> 00:19:59,400 Speaker 2: the marching bands, the upsets. Saturday's just got way more fun. 383 00:19:59,440 --> 00:20:02,680 Speaker 2: College foo fotball is back. Think you know the game. 384 00:20:02,920 --> 00:20:05,400 Speaker 2: Put your college football knowledge to the test with DraftKings 385 00:20:05,480 --> 00:20:09,120 Speaker 2: Sports Book and turn your picks into big payouts. From 386 00:20:09,160 --> 00:20:11,840 Speaker 2: live betting during the game to rivalry week odds boosts, 387 00:20:11,880 --> 00:20:14,880 Speaker 2: and so much more. DraftKings Sportsbook has everything you need 388 00:20:14,920 --> 00:20:17,679 Speaker 2: to stay in the action from kickoff to the final whistle, 389 00:20:17,680 --> 00:20:19,440 Speaker 2: whether you're betting on your go to team or making 390 00:20:19,480 --> 00:20:22,800 Speaker 2: moves mid game as the momentum shifts. Saturdays are yours 391 00:20:22,800 --> 00:20:25,400 Speaker 2: to own with DraftKings sports Book. 392 00:20:25,480 --> 00:20:25,920 Speaker 1: Number three. 393 00:20:25,960 --> 00:20:29,919 Speaker 2: Ohio State is hosting Texas on Saturday the thirtieth. They 394 00:20:29,920 --> 00:20:33,360 Speaker 2: are now a two point five point favorite at home. 395 00:20:33,359 --> 00:20:36,680 Speaker 2: Here's something special for first timers. New customers. Bet five 396 00:20:36,760 --> 00:20:40,639 Speaker 2: dollars and get two hundred dollars in bonus bets. Instantly 397 00:20:41,000 --> 00:20:43,359 Speaker 2: download the Draft Kings Sportsbook app and use code hoops. 398 00:20:43,359 --> 00:20:46,480 Speaker 2: That's code hoops, that's h oops for new customers to 399 00:20:46,480 --> 00:20:48,840 Speaker 2: get two hundred dollars in bonus bets instantly when you 400 00:20:48,920 --> 00:20:52,119 Speaker 2: bet just five bucks in partnership with Draft Kings sportsbook, 401 00:20:52,400 --> 00:20:55,160 Speaker 2: The Crown is Yours. Gambling problem called one eight hundred 402 00:20:55,200 --> 00:20:58,120 Speaker 2: gambler In New York call eight seven seven eight hope 403 00:20:58,200 --> 00:21:00,919 Speaker 2: and why, or text hope and why to four six 404 00:21:01,040 --> 00:21:03,760 Speaker 2: seven three sixty nine. In Connecticut, help us available for 405 00:21:03,800 --> 00:21:07,240 Speaker 2: problem gambling called eight eight eight seven eight nine seven 406 00:21:07,320 --> 00:21:11,120 Speaker 2: seven seven seven or visit CCPG dot org. Please play 407 00:21:11,160 --> 00:21:13,840 Speaker 2: responsibly on behalf of Boothill Casino and Resort In Kansas 408 00:21:14,040 --> 00:21:17,320 Speaker 2: twenty one plus. Age and eligibility varies by jurisdiction. Void 409 00:21:17,320 --> 00:21:21,240 Speaker 2: in Ontario. Bonus bets expire seven days after issuance. For 410 00:21:21,280 --> 00:21:25,800 Speaker 2: additional terms and responsible gaming resources, see dkang dot co, 411 00:21:26,480 --> 00:21:31,880 Speaker 2: slash audio. There are a couple things that I disagree 412 00:21:31,920 --> 00:21:34,400 Speaker 2: with for you, like spite of playing seventy one games, 413 00:21:34,440 --> 00:21:37,000 Speaker 2: was a little out of the ordinary. He typically does 414 00:21:37,080 --> 00:21:40,439 Speaker 2: miss significant chunks of the season. That was one of 415 00:21:40,440 --> 00:21:43,480 Speaker 2: the seasons where he played more than usual, and even 416 00:21:43,520 --> 00:21:45,840 Speaker 2: though he averaged high scoring numbers, I didn't think he 417 00:21:45,880 --> 00:21:49,879 Speaker 2: did an amazing job in terms of flow of the game, 418 00:21:50,240 --> 00:21:53,720 Speaker 2: like floor management type stuff like we talked about when 419 00:21:53,720 --> 00:21:56,040 Speaker 2: we were doing the Donovan Mitchell video, and even though 420 00:21:56,040 --> 00:21:58,199 Speaker 2: he put up big scoring numbers the team, even though 421 00:21:58,240 --> 00:22:00,399 Speaker 2: he was surrounded by a lot of shooting and quality 422 00:22:00,480 --> 00:22:03,360 Speaker 2: role men talent, the Cavs did not put up good 423 00:22:03,359 --> 00:22:07,040 Speaker 2: offensive ratings when Donovan Mitchell was in control of the offense. So, like, 424 00:22:07,680 --> 00:22:09,440 Speaker 2: I push back on a couple of those specific things, 425 00:22:09,440 --> 00:22:11,960 Speaker 2: but I want to dive into this because I don't 426 00:22:11,960 --> 00:22:15,080 Speaker 2: see a large gap between the two. Anybody that I 427 00:22:15,119 --> 00:22:18,879 Speaker 2: have ranked five to twelve, I could see a case 428 00:22:18,960 --> 00:22:21,520 Speaker 2: for any player to be ranked above any player, Like 429 00:22:21,560 --> 00:22:23,240 Speaker 2: there's absolutely a case. 430 00:22:23,400 --> 00:22:25,200 Speaker 1: For Donovan Mitchell to be above Lebron. 431 00:22:25,440 --> 00:22:27,200 Speaker 2: It'd be a harder case to make, but you could 432 00:22:27,240 --> 00:22:29,800 Speaker 2: absolutely argue him above a guy like Anthony Edwards. It 433 00:22:29,800 --> 00:22:34,359 Speaker 2: could be like he has more reliable short range scoring, 434 00:22:34,400 --> 00:22:37,960 Speaker 2: He's got like better floater short range jump shooting. He's 435 00:22:38,880 --> 00:22:42,600 Speaker 2: more attentive and disciplined off ball defender. Anthony Edwards makes 436 00:22:42,600 --> 00:22:44,560 Speaker 2: a lot of mistakes on that end of the floor. Like, 437 00:22:44,600 --> 00:22:47,440 Speaker 2: you could make the case. Again, it's not a case 438 00:22:47,480 --> 00:22:49,840 Speaker 2: I would make. I think Aunt is clearly a little 439 00:22:49,880 --> 00:22:52,840 Speaker 2: bit better than Donovan Mitchell. But the point is is 440 00:22:52,920 --> 00:22:57,280 Speaker 2: like anywhere from five to twelve, you could argue anybody 441 00:22:57,400 --> 00:23:00,280 Speaker 2: over anybody, Like, if you're gonna make a case for 442 00:23:00,359 --> 00:23:02,600 Speaker 2: Lebron to be down at twelve, you're going to focus 443 00:23:02,640 --> 00:23:05,320 Speaker 2: on some of the inconsistencies in the regular season with 444 00:23:05,359 --> 00:23:07,600 Speaker 2: his effort or some of the stuff with his age. 445 00:23:07,600 --> 00:23:10,040 Speaker 2: And if you're going to argue him up to five, 446 00:23:10,119 --> 00:23:12,560 Speaker 2: you're going to be like, well, the guy that was 447 00:23:12,600 --> 00:23:15,040 Speaker 2: playing in the first round against Denver two years ago 448 00:23:15,200 --> 00:23:17,960 Speaker 2: looked like a bona fide top tier superstar, and like, 449 00:23:18,000 --> 00:23:19,840 Speaker 2: when you have that, dude, you just give yourself a 450 00:23:19,840 --> 00:23:20,600 Speaker 2: really good chance. 451 00:23:20,680 --> 00:23:23,639 Speaker 1: Right, You're going to make cases either way. 452 00:23:23,840 --> 00:23:26,320 Speaker 2: And again, the case against health or excuse me, the 453 00:23:26,680 --> 00:23:30,159 Speaker 2: case against Lebron is health. As you mentioned, Lebron at 454 00:23:30,200 --> 00:23:34,040 Speaker 2: his top end, the guy we saw in February, he's 455 00:23:34,040 --> 00:23:35,720 Speaker 2: one of the five best players in the world, but 456 00:23:35,760 --> 00:23:38,479 Speaker 2: there's no guarantee that he'll be at that level when 457 00:23:38,520 --> 00:23:40,919 Speaker 2: you get to the playoffs. And you're right, I thought 458 00:23:40,960 --> 00:23:44,000 Speaker 2: that in twenty twenty three when he had the foot injury, 459 00:23:44,480 --> 00:23:47,359 Speaker 2: he wasn't even close. He was like more like a 460 00:23:47,400 --> 00:23:50,800 Speaker 2: third tier superstar because he had this broken foot and 461 00:23:50,840 --> 00:23:53,439 Speaker 2: he could barely move and it was affecting him in 462 00:23:53,440 --> 00:23:55,720 Speaker 2: a bunch of areas of his game. I thought he 463 00:23:55,920 --> 00:23:57,760 Speaker 2: was at that level in twenty twenty four. It was 464 00:23:57,800 --> 00:24:00,680 Speaker 2: sneaky one of his better playoff series, just got nuked 465 00:24:00,720 --> 00:24:02,639 Speaker 2: by a couple of Jamal Murray game winners, but they 466 00:24:02,720 --> 00:24:05,560 Speaker 2: led the majority of the series. He averaged twenty eight points, 467 00:24:05,560 --> 00:24:09,080 Speaker 2: seven rebounds, and nine assists on sixty four percent tru shooting. 468 00:24:09,359 --> 00:24:12,280 Speaker 2: He hit clutch shot after clutch shot after clutch shot. 469 00:24:12,680 --> 00:24:15,600 Speaker 2: It just the Nuggets did more on offense at the 470 00:24:15,640 --> 00:24:17,320 Speaker 2: end of those games. It just wasn't enough to win 471 00:24:17,359 --> 00:24:19,960 Speaker 2: the series. And again, Denver's one of the great teams 472 00:24:19,960 --> 00:24:22,080 Speaker 2: of this era and they're defending champs at that point 473 00:24:22,119 --> 00:24:26,200 Speaker 2: in time, right, and I thought he was fine against Minnesota. 474 00:24:26,320 --> 00:24:29,560 Speaker 2: He was right at that second tier superstar level, certainly 475 00:24:29,600 --> 00:24:31,600 Speaker 2: better than he was in twenty twenty three when they 476 00:24:31,640 --> 00:24:34,280 Speaker 2: made the Western Conference Finals run, but not as good 477 00:24:34,280 --> 00:24:36,439 Speaker 2: as he was in twenty twenty four. So to your point, 478 00:24:37,000 --> 00:24:38,639 Speaker 2: it's kind of like a roll of the dice with 479 00:24:38,760 --> 00:24:41,840 Speaker 2: Lebron as far as which player you're gonna get when 480 00:24:41,880 --> 00:24:45,320 Speaker 2: you get to the postseason. But that's the first point 481 00:24:45,359 --> 00:24:48,840 Speaker 2: that I have to hone in on here. Lebron's floor 482 00:24:50,080 --> 00:24:53,280 Speaker 2: is just so high as a basketball player still to 483 00:24:53,320 --> 00:24:58,120 Speaker 2: this day, Like injured foot Lebron in the Western Conference 484 00:24:58,200 --> 00:25:01,560 Speaker 2: Finals run five points per game on fifty eight percent 485 00:25:01,560 --> 00:25:04,520 Speaker 2: turre shooting. Again, not the thirty points per game on 486 00:25:04,600 --> 00:25:07,199 Speaker 2: fifty seven percent ture shooting that Donovan Mitchell just put up, 487 00:25:07,800 --> 00:25:10,720 Speaker 2: but still really good. Scoring twenty five points per game 488 00:25:10,760 --> 00:25:13,000 Speaker 2: on fifty eight percent your shooting. Go look, just just 489 00:25:13,119 --> 00:25:16,760 Speaker 2: go look at the NBA dot com website, sort by 490 00:25:16,760 --> 00:25:19,240 Speaker 2: points per game and look at how many players were 491 00:25:19,240 --> 00:25:22,520 Speaker 2: averaging that type of scoring on that type of efficiency. 492 00:25:22,560 --> 00:25:25,919 Speaker 2: In this year's postseason run ten rebounds per game and 493 00:25:26,080 --> 00:25:29,280 Speaker 2: seven assists per game. Ten rebounds per game is a 494 00:25:29,359 --> 00:25:34,120 Speaker 2: huge foundational boost to a basketball team. And like say 495 00:25:34,119 --> 00:25:37,080 Speaker 2: what you want to say about Lebron's regular season defensive effort, 496 00:25:37,320 --> 00:25:40,040 Speaker 2: He's still a very good playoff defender to this day, 497 00:25:41,040 --> 00:25:44,399 Speaker 2: while helping to anchor your defensive rebounding while becoming an 498 00:25:44,440 --> 00:25:46,800 Speaker 2: excellent catch and shoot player. Last two playoff runs, he's 499 00:25:46,840 --> 00:25:48,920 Speaker 2: eighteen for thirty seven on catch and shoot jump shots. 500 00:25:48,920 --> 00:25:51,840 Speaker 2: It's forty nine percent. He can still generate offense, not 501 00:25:51,920 --> 00:25:54,800 Speaker 2: at the level that Donovan Mitchell does now, but still 502 00:25:54,840 --> 00:25:57,320 Speaker 2: really good at it because of his playmaking talent and 503 00:25:57,320 --> 00:26:01,800 Speaker 2: his size and strength and like yeah, like Donovan Mitchell 504 00:26:01,800 --> 00:26:05,160 Speaker 2: had a more impressive regular season. He led a kick 505 00:26:05,200 --> 00:26:08,960 Speaker 2: ass Cleveland Cavaliers team to a phenomenal season, but it's 506 00:26:09,000 --> 00:26:12,000 Speaker 2: important to acknowledge that that was an excellent Cavs team. 507 00:26:12,800 --> 00:26:16,119 Speaker 2: Darius Garland's phenomenal ability to just beat people off the 508 00:26:16,200 --> 00:26:19,440 Speaker 2: dribble and slice teams up in the paint made made 509 00:26:19,440 --> 00:26:22,600 Speaker 2: things easier for everybody. Evan Mobley becoming like a legit 510 00:26:22,720 --> 00:26:26,159 Speaker 2: awesome two way player, Jared Allen established himself as one 511 00:26:26,160 --> 00:26:28,840 Speaker 2: of the better regular season centers in the NBA. They're 512 00:26:29,080 --> 00:26:32,040 Speaker 2: insane depth of three and d off ball talent that 513 00:26:32,119 --> 00:26:36,720 Speaker 2: Kobe Altman put together. It was an awesome team. That 514 00:26:36,840 --> 00:26:40,080 Speaker 2: roster actually makes a shit ton of sense for Lebron James. 515 00:26:40,680 --> 00:26:43,479 Speaker 2: A point guard who can break the defense down, elite 516 00:26:43,480 --> 00:26:46,120 Speaker 2: defenders that can shoot, elite defenders in the front line, 517 00:26:46,119 --> 00:26:48,280 Speaker 2: that anchor things that can handle some of the physicality, 518 00:26:48,720 --> 00:26:51,920 Speaker 2: tons of high level off ball role player talent. That's 519 00:26:52,000 --> 00:26:55,679 Speaker 2: literally why this summer, when Lebron and all the rumors 520 00:26:55,720 --> 00:26:58,639 Speaker 2: around the Lakers started popping up, everyone's like hmm, what 521 00:26:58,720 --> 00:27:00,560 Speaker 2: if he went to Cleveland because it just makes so 522 00:27:00,720 --> 00:27:05,919 Speaker 2: much basketball sets And again, like Lebron, even on the 523 00:27:06,040 --> 00:27:09,080 Speaker 2: low end of what you're gonna get in the postseason, 524 00:27:09,600 --> 00:27:13,320 Speaker 2: his floor is just still so high and you might 525 00:27:13,480 --> 00:27:16,359 Speaker 2: just get one of the top six or seven players 526 00:27:16,400 --> 00:27:18,119 Speaker 2: in the league when you get there, which is a 527 00:27:18,160 --> 00:27:21,280 Speaker 2: ceiling that I don't think Donovan Mitchell can reach. So like, 528 00:27:21,520 --> 00:27:24,760 Speaker 2: I just still think Lebron's a better basketball player than 529 00:27:24,800 --> 00:27:28,359 Speaker 2: Donovan Mitchell, even at his old age. And for the record, 530 00:27:28,400 --> 00:27:31,920 Speaker 2: I believe if you swapped him right now, like right now, 531 00:27:32,840 --> 00:27:35,680 Speaker 2: even with the Jankee lineup stuff, you'd have to move 532 00:27:35,720 --> 00:27:37,800 Speaker 2: Strews to the two and play Lebron at the three 533 00:27:37,880 --> 00:27:40,160 Speaker 2: next to Mobley and Allen. It'd be a little bit funky. 534 00:27:40,720 --> 00:27:45,280 Speaker 2: I think that's a better team. Frankly, I'd make that 535 00:27:45,359 --> 00:27:48,840 Speaker 2: team a gigantic favorite to win the Eastern Conference, and 536 00:27:48,880 --> 00:27:51,200 Speaker 2: I'd give them a substantially better chance to win the title. 537 00:27:51,440 --> 00:27:54,800 Speaker 2: I like, I think Lebron is a bit better than Donovan, 538 00:27:54,920 --> 00:27:58,480 Speaker 2: but I also think the fit, the surrounding talent, all 539 00:27:58,520 --> 00:28:01,600 Speaker 2: that shooting a point that can help break the defense down. 540 00:28:01,680 --> 00:28:06,400 Speaker 2: Like I even think just in pure basketball fit that 541 00:28:06,840 --> 00:28:10,520 Speaker 2: matches up better with Lebron in Cleveland than Donovan Mitchell 542 00:28:10,560 --> 00:28:12,840 Speaker 2: does in Cleveland. So yeah, I again, that's just my take. 543 00:28:12,880 --> 00:28:15,440 Speaker 2: You're not wrong for putting Donovan Mitchell above Lebron. Again, 544 00:28:15,480 --> 00:28:17,800 Speaker 2: I think there's a clear case you can make. I 545 00:28:17,800 --> 00:28:20,760 Speaker 2: think it's a defensible position. But I still think Lebron's 546 00:28:20,760 --> 00:28:22,760 Speaker 2: a better basketball player than Donovan Mitchell. By the way, 547 00:28:23,240 --> 00:28:25,040 Speaker 2: I'm gonna be hitting him very soon, so it's not 548 00:28:25,080 --> 00:28:27,600 Speaker 2: like I have him astronomically high. I just have him 549 00:28:27,600 --> 00:28:29,480 Speaker 2: ahead of the guys that I have below him on 550 00:28:29,520 --> 00:28:34,520 Speaker 2: the list right now. Next question, Austin Reeves and Jared 551 00:28:34,600 --> 00:28:38,280 Speaker 2: Vanderbilt for Jaden McDaniels. I see this as a mutually 552 00:28:38,320 --> 00:28:41,920 Speaker 2: beneficial trade for both teams. What are your thoughts. It's 553 00:28:41,960 --> 00:28:45,480 Speaker 2: an interesting trade on the surface, especially when you view 554 00:28:45,520 --> 00:28:48,320 Speaker 2: it through just a short term lens. Right, Like Austin 555 00:28:48,360 --> 00:28:52,360 Speaker 2: Reeves provides secondary ball handling to a Minnesota team that 556 00:28:52,560 --> 00:28:55,600 Speaker 2: desperately needs that kind of like skill guard off of 557 00:28:55,640 --> 00:29:00,560 Speaker 2: Anthony Edwards right, and Jaden McDaniels makes the Lakers Stantiley 558 00:29:00,600 --> 00:29:04,080 Speaker 2: more athletic and gives them that starting caliber small forward 559 00:29:04,120 --> 00:29:07,480 Speaker 2: that they desperately need. But it comes with a fatal 560 00:29:07,480 --> 00:29:11,000 Speaker 2: flaw for both teams. For the Lakers, part of the 561 00:29:11,000 --> 00:29:14,080 Speaker 2: reason why they value Austin Reeves is the proven pathway 562 00:29:14,120 --> 00:29:17,040 Speaker 2: to success with Luka Dancic, which is another kind of 563 00:29:17,120 --> 00:29:22,240 Speaker 2: like pound the ball type of shot creator that can run, spread, 564 00:29:22,280 --> 00:29:24,760 Speaker 2: pick and roll with similar types of players that Luca 565 00:29:24,840 --> 00:29:28,080 Speaker 2: plays with, and just run a reasonable fact simile of 566 00:29:28,160 --> 00:29:31,200 Speaker 2: what Luca does to spell Luca when he's off ball 567 00:29:31,280 --> 00:29:33,680 Speaker 2: and to carry the offense when Luca's off the floor. 568 00:29:33,880 --> 00:29:38,200 Speaker 2: I think the Lakers view Austin Reeves as their Kyrie 569 00:29:38,280 --> 00:29:42,200 Speaker 2: Irving or their Jalen Brunson in terms of being that 570 00:29:42,240 --> 00:29:45,200 Speaker 2: secondary ball And now there's a much more complicated conversation 571 00:29:45,240 --> 00:29:47,320 Speaker 2: we can have about whether or not Austin's capable of that. 572 00:29:47,960 --> 00:29:51,160 Speaker 2: Jalen Brunson is top ten on this list this year, 573 00:29:51,480 --> 00:29:54,160 Speaker 2: and Kyrie Irving is one of the best number twos 574 00:29:54,200 --> 00:29:56,000 Speaker 2: of all time as a guy who's literally won a 575 00:29:56,040 --> 00:29:58,640 Speaker 2: championship in that role. And I don't think anybody's under 576 00:29:58,640 --> 00:30:03,680 Speaker 2: any delusions thinking that Austin Reeves is better than Kyrie Irving, 577 00:30:03,720 --> 00:30:06,480 Speaker 2: and I don't think any of us are thinking that right. 578 00:30:07,560 --> 00:30:10,520 Speaker 2: So there's a complicated conversation you could get into, which 579 00:30:10,560 --> 00:30:14,200 Speaker 2: is like, are the Lakers making the right decision betting 580 00:30:14,200 --> 00:30:16,840 Speaker 2: on Austin Reeves being their number two with Luca? 581 00:30:16,880 --> 00:30:19,000 Speaker 1: But I think that's what they see him as. 582 00:30:19,160 --> 00:30:22,400 Speaker 2: I think that's what they see So I don't think 583 00:30:22,400 --> 00:30:25,840 Speaker 2: they're going to make a move that trades Austin Reeves 584 00:30:26,240 --> 00:30:29,200 Speaker 2: unless they're getting that guy back, the guy who's going 585 00:30:29,240 --> 00:30:31,959 Speaker 2: to be Luca's number two, or unless they have a 586 00:30:32,080 --> 00:30:35,040 Speaker 2: clear plan like, oh, this guy's gonna come sign with 587 00:30:35,160 --> 00:30:37,240 Speaker 2: us or whatever. It might be some sort of intel, 588 00:30:37,360 --> 00:30:40,880 Speaker 2: some sort of plan to replace that guy who's secondary 589 00:30:40,920 --> 00:30:44,640 Speaker 2: off of Luca right when Lebron retires or before. If 590 00:30:44,680 --> 00:30:46,840 Speaker 2: they don't have that, I don't think they're going to 591 00:30:46,880 --> 00:30:49,680 Speaker 2: trade Austin. And then the second piece of it is, 592 00:30:50,440 --> 00:30:54,880 Speaker 2: if you trade Jaden McDaniels, the Timberwolves suddenly have a 593 00:30:55,000 --> 00:30:58,280 Speaker 2: gaping hole at the small at the small forward position. 594 00:30:59,640 --> 00:31:03,080 Speaker 2: Like ar Vanderbilt, you included him in that deal. If 595 00:31:03,080 --> 00:31:04,920 Speaker 2: he started next to Julius Randall, I think that would 596 00:31:04,920 --> 00:31:07,920 Speaker 2: be a spacing disaster, especially with Rudy Gobert on the floor. 597 00:31:08,560 --> 00:31:11,640 Speaker 2: I don't think Terrence Shannon is ready for a starting 598 00:31:11,720 --> 00:31:14,960 Speaker 2: role yet. If you start Dante DiVincenzo, you're gonna start 599 00:31:15,000 --> 00:31:17,600 Speaker 2: having size issues. I just think it would be plugging 600 00:31:17,680 --> 00:31:20,200 Speaker 2: one hole but creating another hole in the process. So 601 00:31:20,240 --> 00:31:22,560 Speaker 2: I just don't think it makes sense there. If the 602 00:31:22,640 --> 00:31:26,680 Speaker 2: Lakers are going to make a move for like an 603 00:31:26,680 --> 00:31:29,560 Speaker 2: elite starting two or three, somebody in the JD McDaniels, 604 00:31:29,600 --> 00:31:32,760 Speaker 2: ilk even like Herb Jones, and they're not gonna move 605 00:31:32,800 --> 00:31:36,720 Speaker 2: on like an Andrew Wiggins something along those lines because 606 00:31:36,720 --> 00:31:38,959 Speaker 2: he's too old. I think they're gonna have to wait 607 00:31:39,040 --> 00:31:40,920 Speaker 2: till the middle of the season. I don't see anything 608 00:31:40,960 --> 00:31:43,200 Speaker 2: that makes sense right now, because again, they have to 609 00:31:43,200 --> 00:31:46,080 Speaker 2: have a plan for a ball handler coming back, or 610 00:31:46,120 --> 00:31:48,480 Speaker 2: they need to be able to get that player without 611 00:31:48,520 --> 00:31:51,600 Speaker 2: including Austin Reeves, which then puts you into a different 612 00:31:51,640 --> 00:31:54,400 Speaker 2: class of player right or at least a player that's 613 00:31:54,480 --> 00:31:56,920 Speaker 2: not yet available that can drive the market price down. 614 00:31:57,400 --> 00:31:59,640 Speaker 2: They're gonna have to wait till something takes shape elsewhere 615 00:31:59,640 --> 00:32:02,600 Speaker 2: around the league, like oh, the Pacers fall out the 616 00:32:02,640 --> 00:32:05,240 Speaker 2: gates and decide they're willing to get rid of an 617 00:32:05,280 --> 00:32:09,880 Speaker 2: Aaron Nee Smith for example, like or like Andrew Nevhart 618 00:32:09,920 --> 00:32:11,640 Speaker 2: would be like a pipe dream because he'd be a 619 00:32:11,640 --> 00:32:13,800 Speaker 2: guy that could also be that secondary ball handler off 620 00:32:13,800 --> 00:32:16,160 Speaker 2: of Luca. But like you're if you could get a 621 00:32:16,200 --> 00:32:18,720 Speaker 2: player like that, it's gonna have to materialize at some 622 00:32:18,800 --> 00:32:20,719 Speaker 2: point down the line, because I just don't think it 623 00:32:20,840 --> 00:32:23,800 Speaker 2: exists right this right at this point, and I think 624 00:32:23,800 --> 00:32:26,320 Speaker 2: it's probably more likely because of the Lakers are so 625 00:32:26,960 --> 00:32:30,320 Speaker 2: hesitant to give up draft assets at this point, holding 626 00:32:30,360 --> 00:32:33,320 Speaker 2: out for the superstar that they're gonna pair Luca with. 627 00:32:34,120 --> 00:32:36,360 Speaker 2: I think it's probably more likely that they end up 628 00:32:36,400 --> 00:32:40,440 Speaker 2: getting older options, like someone like a Conavious Callwell Pope 629 00:32:40,440 --> 00:32:44,200 Speaker 2: out of Memphis right like on a buyout, or maybe 630 00:32:44,360 --> 00:32:48,000 Speaker 2: you because CACP has a player option after this coming 631 00:32:48,040 --> 00:32:50,800 Speaker 2: season for over twenty million dollars, So like maybe you 632 00:32:50,920 --> 00:32:54,640 Speaker 2: ship out expirings guys like Gabe Vincent and Max Kliba 633 00:32:55,080 --> 00:32:57,640 Speaker 2: and you just tell Memphis like, we're not giving you 634 00:32:57,680 --> 00:33:01,280 Speaker 2: anything else, but we'll take CASEP and clear your books 635 00:33:01,320 --> 00:33:05,360 Speaker 2: next summer and we'll take ACPs as a starting too. 636 00:33:05,520 --> 00:33:07,360 Speaker 2: That would be the kind of deal that I think 637 00:33:07,640 --> 00:33:11,160 Speaker 2: is more likely for the Lakers than something that's kind 638 00:33:11,160 --> 00:33:13,800 Speaker 2: of splash year and bigger, because I just think that 639 00:33:13,840 --> 00:33:16,080 Speaker 2: they're trying to play the slow game with Luca, which 640 00:33:16,120 --> 00:33:18,720 Speaker 2: I think again the problem with playing the slow game 641 00:33:18,760 --> 00:33:22,600 Speaker 2: with Luca is whatever you anticipate, you can get that 642 00:33:22,680 --> 00:33:25,480 Speaker 2: big carrot that you're thinking about that's going to drive 643 00:33:25,520 --> 00:33:28,400 Speaker 2: all the success in the Luka doncic Era. You got 644 00:33:28,400 --> 00:33:30,440 Speaker 2: to also factor in that you're losing an All NBA 645 00:33:30,520 --> 00:33:33,240 Speaker 2: player like Lebron is probably going to be an All 646 00:33:33,360 --> 00:33:36,720 Speaker 2: NBA player this season, and that might be the last time. 647 00:33:37,680 --> 00:33:38,880 Speaker 1: And whenever Lebron. 648 00:33:38,640 --> 00:33:41,440 Speaker 2: Leaves, whether he gets hurt this year or the like 649 00:33:42,640 --> 00:33:45,160 Speaker 2: gets hurt next year, or just decides to retire at 650 00:33:45,160 --> 00:33:49,760 Speaker 2: some point, whenever Lebron's done, you're removing an All NBA 651 00:33:49,920 --> 00:33:52,920 Speaker 2: player from this roster. And so that's kind of why 652 00:33:52,960 --> 00:33:56,320 Speaker 2: I view the overcautiousness as a little bit of a 653 00:33:58,520 --> 00:34:00,880 Speaker 2: flawed strategy. That's not to say that you need to 654 00:34:00,920 --> 00:34:02,920 Speaker 2: go mortgage your future. As I've said, I don't think 655 00:34:02,920 --> 00:34:06,680 Speaker 2: the Lakers need to go move Austin a first round 656 00:34:06,680 --> 00:34:09,920 Speaker 2: pick and all these swaps and second round draft compensation 657 00:34:10,120 --> 00:34:14,239 Speaker 2: and everything in under the sun to go get a 658 00:34:14,280 --> 00:34:17,839 Speaker 2: thirty year old Andrew Wiggins. I'm not saying that I've 659 00:34:17,880 --> 00:34:20,560 Speaker 2: said on the record, I don't think that the Lakers 660 00:34:20,760 --> 00:34:23,839 Speaker 2: should move on Andrew Wiggins unless they can do it 661 00:34:23,880 --> 00:34:27,880 Speaker 2: without including the first round pick, because I understand their situation. 662 00:34:28,040 --> 00:34:30,680 Speaker 2: I would just include Dalton and maybe a swap and 663 00:34:30,719 --> 00:34:33,640 Speaker 2: a second round pick and see if you can squeeze 664 00:34:33,680 --> 00:34:37,280 Speaker 2: Wiggins out of them, you know, like, because obviously making 665 00:34:37,320 --> 00:34:39,840 Speaker 2: a move for Wiggins is a win now type of 666 00:34:39,880 --> 00:34:42,440 Speaker 2: move that doesn't have as much long term upside. 667 00:34:42,440 --> 00:34:43,640 Speaker 1: But I am. 668 00:34:43,640 --> 00:34:48,040 Speaker 2: Saying that if an elite let's say a Jaden McDaniels, 669 00:34:48,080 --> 00:34:52,520 Speaker 2: for example, comes available, someone of that ilk Herb Jones, 670 00:34:52,560 --> 00:34:55,719 Speaker 2: whoever it might be, and you can get that deal 671 00:34:55,760 --> 00:34:59,040 Speaker 2: done with the first round pick and you keep Austin. 672 00:34:59,719 --> 00:35:01,879 Speaker 2: I the Lakers would hold on to the first round 673 00:35:01,880 --> 00:35:05,200 Speaker 2: pick because of their pipe dreams of Giannis, And I'm 674 00:35:05,239 --> 00:35:08,120 Speaker 2: saying I think that a first round pick spent on 675 00:35:08,200 --> 00:35:12,200 Speaker 2: a twenty six year old, legitimate, awesome three and D 676 00:35:12,360 --> 00:35:17,360 Speaker 2: guy at the small forward position would be mutually beneficial 677 00:35:17,400 --> 00:35:18,920 Speaker 2: to this era and the future. 678 00:35:19,440 --> 00:35:21,400 Speaker 1: On the one hand, all of a sudden. 679 00:35:21,120 --> 00:35:23,960 Speaker 2: You've got Lebron and Luca and this kick ass three 680 00:35:24,000 --> 00:35:26,239 Speaker 2: and D player that you can go try to make 681 00:35:26,239 --> 00:35:29,440 Speaker 2: a run with right now. And that guy's an asset. 682 00:35:29,520 --> 00:35:31,520 Speaker 2: He's a three and d player in his twenties. He's 683 00:35:31,560 --> 00:35:35,280 Speaker 2: worth while. He's worth something. So even if you decided 684 00:35:35,320 --> 00:35:37,720 Speaker 2: to go make a move for a superstar down the line, 685 00:35:37,920 --> 00:35:40,200 Speaker 2: he's a guy you can include in a deal like 686 00:35:40,239 --> 00:35:42,520 Speaker 2: that that the other team is going to be like, well, 687 00:35:42,840 --> 00:35:46,680 Speaker 2: we're getting back a twenty eight year old all defense guy. 688 00:35:47,280 --> 00:35:49,879 Speaker 2: This is something I can sell to my fans, right. 689 00:35:50,800 --> 00:35:55,360 Speaker 2: I think that the asset management piece and the lack 690 00:35:55,440 --> 00:36:00,560 Speaker 2: of valuation from the lakers of super high levels starters 691 00:36:01,280 --> 00:36:05,719 Speaker 2: as opposed to superstar talent. I think that lack of 692 00:36:05,800 --> 00:36:09,040 Speaker 2: value placed on super high level starters is going to 693 00:36:09,080 --> 00:36:11,280 Speaker 2: be a mistake in this Luca era. I think Luca 694 00:36:11,360 --> 00:36:14,239 Speaker 2: is such a unique star. He's such an offense in 695 00:36:14,280 --> 00:36:17,640 Speaker 2: and of himself that he's not as dependent on super 696 00:36:17,719 --> 00:36:21,279 Speaker 2: super high level superstar support. That's why he can make 697 00:36:21,360 --> 00:36:23,479 Speaker 2: get it done with Kyrie Irving or get it done 698 00:36:23,480 --> 00:36:25,520 Speaker 2: with Austin and like or not with Austin a guy 699 00:36:25,600 --> 00:36:28,680 Speaker 2: like Jalen Brunson, right, and by the way, like that 700 00:36:28,719 --> 00:36:32,240 Speaker 2: Celtics team is an all time great. They lost Luca 701 00:36:32,320 --> 00:36:35,000 Speaker 2: personally needed to make some improvements, especially as a defender 702 00:36:35,000 --> 00:36:38,440 Speaker 2: and getting into better shape. There are checkpoints that Luca 703 00:36:38,560 --> 00:36:41,680 Speaker 2: has to hit in order for that build to work 704 00:36:41,760 --> 00:36:44,879 Speaker 2: in order to win a championship. But like, Luca kind 705 00:36:44,880 --> 00:36:48,160 Speaker 2: of grants you the grace of not necessarily needing a 706 00:36:48,200 --> 00:36:51,879 Speaker 2: top tier superstar next to him. Same with Jokic, Right, 707 00:36:52,239 --> 00:36:55,440 Speaker 2: That's how Jokic won the title. He's such an offense 708 00:36:55,480 --> 00:37:00,239 Speaker 2: to himself. He's such an elite, high end engine that 709 00:37:00,320 --> 00:37:04,920 Speaker 2: he can win with really high level starters rather than needing, 710 00:37:05,560 --> 00:37:08,439 Speaker 2: you know, to have Giannis next to him. Right, that's 711 00:37:08,480 --> 00:37:14,680 Speaker 2: the unique thing that these ultra indomitable offensive engines bring 712 00:37:14,680 --> 00:37:16,760 Speaker 2: to the table. And if Luca gets in great shape 713 00:37:16,800 --> 00:37:18,800 Speaker 2: and he doesn't tire out at the end of games, 714 00:37:18,840 --> 00:37:21,840 Speaker 2: and he gets better on defense, I do think he 715 00:37:21,880 --> 00:37:25,000 Speaker 2: can win a title surrounded by super high level starters 716 00:37:25,200 --> 00:37:28,640 Speaker 2: and a legitimate secondary creator the ilk of the Kyrie 717 00:37:28,719 --> 00:37:34,080 Speaker 2: Brunson variety. Right, So, like that to me is the pathway. 718 00:37:34,120 --> 00:37:35,920 Speaker 2: And so I think that's where I just differ with 719 00:37:35,960 --> 00:37:39,920 Speaker 2: the Lakers, and they're kind of big picture like basketball philosophy. 720 00:37:39,960 --> 00:37:42,120 Speaker 2: It's like, I don't think the Lakers have a big 721 00:37:42,120 --> 00:37:44,600 Speaker 2: picture basketball philosophy, or at least if they do, it's 722 00:37:44,640 --> 00:37:47,719 Speaker 2: being drowned out by the superiors. Like I know, there 723 00:37:47,760 --> 00:37:49,560 Speaker 2: are really smart people that work in the Laker front 724 00:37:49,600 --> 00:37:54,759 Speaker 2: office underneath Rob Polinka, and like I just I am 725 00:37:54,840 --> 00:37:59,680 Speaker 2: not sure if the Rob Jeanie, you know, Kurt rambis 726 00:37:59,760 --> 00:38:03,799 Speaker 2: craft out has the appropriate vision for what works in 727 00:38:03,840 --> 00:38:07,400 Speaker 2: the modern him yet even under Luca. And so that's 728 00:38:07,480 --> 00:38:09,200 Speaker 2: what kind of freaks me out a little bit, is 729 00:38:09,239 --> 00:38:11,600 Speaker 2: like I don't I think if you ask them like 730 00:38:12,640 --> 00:38:17,439 Speaker 2: what Herb Jones is worth, they would probably speak more 731 00:38:17,640 --> 00:38:20,160 Speaker 2: like they would not be willing to spend as much 732 00:38:20,160 --> 00:38:22,200 Speaker 2: as some of the smarter teams in the league would 733 00:38:22,200 --> 00:38:24,399 Speaker 2: be willing to spend to get a guy like that, 734 00:38:25,080 --> 00:38:28,160 Speaker 2: when the reality is is alongside Luka Doncic, when he 735 00:38:28,200 --> 00:38:33,080 Speaker 2: would generate Herb a million butt naked corner threes and 736 00:38:33,160 --> 00:38:36,560 Speaker 2: his ability to guard on the perimeter and funnel into 737 00:38:36,560 --> 00:38:38,520 Speaker 2: a rim protector and all those sorts of things that 738 00:38:38,960 --> 00:38:42,880 Speaker 2: Herb Jones can do in the context of Luca, that's 739 00:38:43,080 --> 00:38:45,799 Speaker 2: worth more than even if you picked up Herb and 740 00:38:45,840 --> 00:38:51,800 Speaker 2: put him somewhere else. Like, Luca is such a unique 741 00:38:51,920 --> 00:38:56,560 Speaker 2: player in the way that he drives value for that 742 00:38:56,719 --> 00:38:58,279 Speaker 2: type of role player, And I just hope that the 743 00:38:58,320 --> 00:39:01,120 Speaker 2: Lakers value that sort of thing eventually, Jason, I don't 744 00:39:01,120 --> 00:39:03,120 Speaker 2: know if this mail bag, if this is mail bag, 745 00:39:03,120 --> 00:39:04,680 Speaker 2: but I've watched Curry and Lebron go at it for 746 00:39:04,680 --> 00:39:06,839 Speaker 2: the last five years, and I've noticed that Curry tends 747 00:39:06,880 --> 00:39:09,719 Speaker 2: to outplay him in regard to impact. A lot of 748 00:39:09,760 --> 00:39:11,480 Speaker 2: people don't want to accept it, but I seriously think 749 00:39:11,520 --> 00:39:14,040 Speaker 2: he's been better than Lebron for the last couple of years. 750 00:39:14,160 --> 00:39:16,080 Speaker 2: A lot of general fans point to stats to show 751 00:39:16,080 --> 00:39:18,239 Speaker 2: that it's close, but in my opinion, Curry's impact has 752 00:39:18,280 --> 00:39:22,239 Speaker 2: been great, far greater than Lebron's, and I've noticed that 753 00:39:22,360 --> 00:39:27,240 Speaker 2: Lebron's stats make him often better than he I can't 754 00:39:27,239 --> 00:39:28,560 Speaker 2: this is what must have just been a type of 755 00:39:28,640 --> 00:39:31,359 Speaker 2: it says make him out out to be better than 756 00:39:31,400 --> 00:39:33,719 Speaker 2: he is. In the last three to four years. He 757 00:39:33,760 --> 00:39:36,920 Speaker 2: slacks off a lot on defense, and his points seem 758 00:39:36,960 --> 00:39:38,879 Speaker 2: to be a bit hollow or empty. Don't get me wrong, 759 00:39:39,760 --> 00:39:42,080 Speaker 2: but he's still been a top five player the last 760 00:39:42,120 --> 00:39:44,000 Speaker 2: five seasons. But I could I could definitely be wrong, 761 00:39:44,000 --> 00:39:46,759 Speaker 2: but I was wondering on your thoughts about how about this, 762 00:39:46,880 --> 00:39:49,840 Speaker 2: especially since most NBA fans don't watch games and just 763 00:39:49,880 --> 00:39:52,239 Speaker 2: point to stats to show how close it is. So 764 00:39:53,320 --> 00:39:55,520 Speaker 2: more or less, you're just saying you think Lebron or 765 00:39:55,560 --> 00:39:58,040 Speaker 2: STEP's been better than Lebron for the last couple of years. 766 00:39:58,120 --> 00:40:00,680 Speaker 2: You said far better. I don't think it's far better, 767 00:40:00,760 --> 00:40:03,359 Speaker 2: but I actually agree with you. I think Steph has 768 00:40:03,360 --> 00:40:06,320 Speaker 2: been better than Lebron over the last few years. Lebron 769 00:40:06,400 --> 00:40:09,759 Speaker 2: is super old now and he's just more prone to 770 00:40:09,800 --> 00:40:11,680 Speaker 2: injuries that makes it harder for him to. 771 00:40:11,680 --> 00:40:12,279 Speaker 1: Reach his peak. 772 00:40:12,320 --> 00:40:15,040 Speaker 2: His peak is still every bit as high as everyone 773 00:40:15,040 --> 00:40:17,240 Speaker 2: else in the league. Like again, last year in February, 774 00:40:17,239 --> 00:40:19,440 Speaker 2: there was there wasn't an NBA player playing better than 775 00:40:19,520 --> 00:40:22,480 Speaker 2: Lebron last year in February, but then he got hurt again, right, 776 00:40:23,080 --> 00:40:24,520 Speaker 2: And I mean, you guys are starting to see this, 777 00:40:24,600 --> 00:40:27,799 Speaker 2: you Steph fans, like Steph has been a monster, but 778 00:40:28,239 --> 00:40:30,840 Speaker 2: he just got hurt. He's thirty seven now, Like this 779 00:40:30,960 --> 00:40:33,200 Speaker 2: is kind of what happens when you get into these years. 780 00:40:33,200 --> 00:40:35,080 Speaker 2: And we'll see if that ends up being a fluke. 781 00:40:35,280 --> 00:40:37,520 Speaker 2: And it was just because he had to carry such 782 00:40:37,560 --> 00:40:40,480 Speaker 2: crazy load right in the run up to the playoffs, 783 00:40:40,520 --> 00:40:43,239 Speaker 2: because of their predicament, because they waited so long to 784 00:40:43,239 --> 00:40:45,160 Speaker 2: make a trade. And maybe Steph will be healthy from 785 00:40:45,200 --> 00:40:45,600 Speaker 2: here on out. 786 00:40:45,600 --> 00:40:46,040 Speaker 1: We'll see you. 787 00:40:46,080 --> 00:40:49,600 Speaker 2: But like I do agree that Steph has been better 788 00:40:49,640 --> 00:40:53,000 Speaker 2: in the last few years than Lebron has been. Like 789 00:40:53,040 --> 00:40:55,879 Speaker 2: from i'd say twenty twenty two to twenty twenty four, Yeah, 790 00:40:55,880 --> 00:40:56,759 Speaker 2: that stretch. 791 00:40:56,400 --> 00:40:58,320 Speaker 1: He's been a more reliably great player. 792 00:41:00,000 --> 00:41:01,879 Speaker 2: It's actually why it's so difficult to have these kinds 793 00:41:01,880 --> 00:41:05,400 Speaker 2: of discussions with people. Everyone just focused on the wins 794 00:41:05,400 --> 00:41:09,320 Speaker 2: and losses when basketball is just so much more complicated 795 00:41:09,320 --> 00:41:14,399 Speaker 2: than that. For example, the Lakers led by Lebron, beat 796 00:41:14,440 --> 00:41:18,239 Speaker 2: the Warriors in twenty twenty three led by Steph, but 797 00:41:18,320 --> 00:41:20,600 Speaker 2: I thought Steph was a better player than Lebron in 798 00:41:20,640 --> 00:41:23,960 Speaker 2: that series. Lebron was on a bad foot. He was 799 00:41:23,960 --> 00:41:27,440 Speaker 2: struggling to score effectively. Lebron was great in Game six, 800 00:41:27,560 --> 00:41:30,560 Speaker 2: especially like the Lebron was awesome at times in that series, 801 00:41:30,560 --> 00:41:32,560 Speaker 2: and again in Game six, he was a fucking monster. 802 00:41:33,000 --> 00:41:36,120 Speaker 2: But Steph was the better player in that series. But 803 00:41:37,000 --> 00:41:42,040 Speaker 2: the Lakers were the better team and the better team won. Similarly, 804 00:41:42,080 --> 00:41:45,600 Speaker 2: you'll hear Warriors fans constantly talk about how they went 805 00:41:45,600 --> 00:41:48,399 Speaker 2: three to one against Lebron in the finals. I thought 806 00:41:48,480 --> 00:41:51,000 Speaker 2: Lebron was the best player in all four of those series. 807 00:41:51,560 --> 00:41:55,200 Speaker 2: The Warriors were just obviously. Similarly to the Lakers Warriors 808 00:41:55,200 --> 00:41:58,280 Speaker 2: series in twenty twenty three, the Warriors were just obviously 809 00:41:58,320 --> 00:42:03,480 Speaker 2: better teams. The twenty fifteen Calves were decimated by injuries. 810 00:42:03,520 --> 00:42:05,799 Speaker 2: In that series, Kyrie and Kevin Love out, there was 811 00:42:05,840 --> 00:42:09,319 Speaker 2: a massive talent gap, and then the KD Warriors are 812 00:42:09,440 --> 00:42:12,840 Speaker 2: literally the greatest roster ever assembled in the history of 813 00:42:12,880 --> 00:42:18,720 Speaker 2: the NBA. People were just being dense for whatever reason, 814 00:42:19,640 --> 00:42:21,600 Speaker 2: at least among the Warriors fans that look back on 815 00:42:21,640 --> 00:42:24,640 Speaker 2: that era. I mean, if the Lakers traded for Yannis 816 00:42:24,760 --> 00:42:30,640 Speaker 2: tomorrow and Luca and Yannis knocked Jokic out of the playoffs, 817 00:42:31,960 --> 00:42:35,240 Speaker 2: that doesn't mean that Luca or Janis are better than Jokic. 818 00:42:35,840 --> 00:42:41,680 Speaker 2: That's incredibly stupid logic. But for whatever reason, Warriors fans 819 00:42:41,719 --> 00:42:46,319 Speaker 2: make that very case when arguing Steph over Lebron. When 820 00:42:46,320 --> 00:42:48,480 Speaker 2: the second and third best players in the league at 821 00:42:48,480 --> 00:42:51,000 Speaker 2: the peak of their powers played on the same team, 822 00:42:51,360 --> 00:42:56,440 Speaker 2: they beat Lebron twice. So my take is for the 823 00:42:56,600 --> 00:43:00,640 Speaker 2: entirety of Lebron's prime, Lebron was a better player than Steph, 824 00:43:01,080 --> 00:43:03,960 Speaker 2: but Steph in his late prime has been better than 825 00:43:04,120 --> 00:43:09,040 Speaker 2: thirty eight thirty nine, forty year old Lebron. And lastly, 826 00:43:09,160 --> 00:43:11,520 Speaker 2: the gap in both of these cases is close in 827 00:43:11,560 --> 00:43:13,239 Speaker 2: my opinion, which I think is a testament to the 828 00:43:13,239 --> 00:43:16,120 Speaker 2: greatness of both of them. So, for instance, like I 829 00:43:16,160 --> 00:43:18,399 Speaker 2: do think Lebron is better than Steph during that whole era, 830 00:43:18,960 --> 00:43:23,680 Speaker 2: but Steph got close. He got close to the guy 831 00:43:23,840 --> 00:43:26,479 Speaker 2: many folks consider to be the best basketball player ever. 832 00:43:27,000 --> 00:43:29,359 Speaker 2: That's an incredible feather in Steph's cap. That's a big 833 00:43:29,400 --> 00:43:31,759 Speaker 2: part of why I have Steph as the fifth best 834 00:43:31,760 --> 00:43:35,640 Speaker 2: perimeter player of all time. He legit competed like Whent 835 00:43:35,760 --> 00:43:40,360 Speaker 2: toe to toe and competed against the goat. 836 00:43:40,560 --> 00:43:41,400 Speaker 1: It's remarkable. 837 00:43:42,400 --> 00:43:47,359 Speaker 2: Similarly, Lebron's staying close to Steph and the stars at 838 00:43:47,360 --> 00:43:49,440 Speaker 2: the top of the like it's close. Like Steph's been 839 00:43:49,480 --> 00:43:52,320 Speaker 2: better than Lebron the last couple of years, but Lebron 840 00:43:52,400 --> 00:43:54,600 Speaker 2: still made second team All NBA and was sixth and 841 00:43:54,719 --> 00:43:58,640 Speaker 2: MVP voting last year, and like has definitively been right 842 00:43:58,719 --> 00:44:02,880 Speaker 2: up there hanging on for dear life with those guys. 843 00:44:03,880 --> 00:44:05,239 Speaker 1: That he like. 844 00:44:05,280 --> 00:44:07,759 Speaker 2: It's he continues to make All NBA every year. He 845 00:44:07,880 --> 00:44:11,799 Speaker 2: just got second team. It's a truly remarkable accomplishment for 846 00:44:11,840 --> 00:44:15,640 Speaker 2: a forty year old basketball player. Him remaining at that 847 00:44:15,760 --> 00:44:19,160 Speaker 2: level for as long as he has is literally the 848 00:44:19,239 --> 00:44:22,480 Speaker 2: biggest part of why I view him as the goat. 849 00:44:23,880 --> 00:44:28,240 Speaker 2: If I'm starting to franchise from scratch and I'm guaranteed 850 00:44:29,360 --> 00:44:31,719 Speaker 2: a ten year stretch where he's the best player in 851 00:44:31,760 --> 00:44:35,080 Speaker 2: the world and another decade plus where he's an All 852 00:44:35,160 --> 00:44:38,480 Speaker 2: NBA player, I'm giving myself a lot of chances to 853 00:44:38,480 --> 00:44:42,440 Speaker 2: build a championship team. No one's come close to that. 854 00:44:43,280 --> 00:44:47,239 Speaker 2: And last little bonus, Steph topic here again. He just 855 00:44:47,280 --> 00:44:50,120 Speaker 2: suffered that injury in the postseason, which kind of takes 856 00:44:50,160 --> 00:44:53,360 Speaker 2: away from this, But he's putting together a sneaky little 857 00:44:54,080 --> 00:45:00,360 Speaker 2: case for longevity on his own, like amongst small guards 858 00:45:01,280 --> 00:45:04,040 Speaker 2: at his age, to make second team All NBA. Like 859 00:45:04,360 --> 00:45:07,160 Speaker 2: most small guards fall apart rapidly in this phase of 860 00:45:07,200 --> 00:45:11,200 Speaker 2: their career, and Steph just hasn't. I'm curious to see 861 00:45:11,239 --> 00:45:13,480 Speaker 2: how long he'll drag out this level of play, because, 862 00:45:13,520 --> 00:45:15,839 Speaker 2: like I still have him pretty high on the list 863 00:45:15,840 --> 00:45:19,480 Speaker 2: this year, I have him above Lebron again, But at 864 00:45:19,480 --> 00:45:20,840 Speaker 2: the same time, he just got hurt and he just 865 00:45:20,840 --> 00:45:22,960 Speaker 2: missed a playoff series, so hopefully that isn't a sign 866 00:45:23,000 --> 00:45:23,600 Speaker 2: of things to come. 867 00:45:23,640 --> 00:45:24,480 Speaker 1: I'm hoping, Like I. 868 00:45:24,400 --> 00:45:26,200 Speaker 2: Said that that was more to do with the Warriors 869 00:45:26,640 --> 00:45:29,400 Speaker 2: waiting forever to finally get Steph a second star, and 870 00:45:29,440 --> 00:45:31,759 Speaker 2: he wore his body down to the point where he 871 00:45:31,760 --> 00:45:33,400 Speaker 2: had to play super hard at the end of the 872 00:45:33,400 --> 00:45:35,760 Speaker 2: season instead of chilling and getting ready for the playoffs. 873 00:45:35,760 --> 00:45:38,399 Speaker 2: So like, whether or not it was a fluke will 874 00:45:38,400 --> 00:45:41,400 Speaker 2: play a big role in where I rank Steph next summer, right, like, 875 00:45:41,400 --> 00:45:43,600 Speaker 2: if he gets hurt again this year, then like if 876 00:45:43,600 --> 00:45:45,680 Speaker 2: he gets hurt again this year, or if he's dealing 877 00:45:45,719 --> 00:45:47,960 Speaker 2: with the nagging injury that causes him to play below 878 00:45:48,000 --> 00:45:50,000 Speaker 2: his peak when we get to the postseason, all of 879 00:45:50,040 --> 00:45:52,400 Speaker 2: a sudden, those same cases you're making about Lebron and 880 00:45:52,440 --> 00:45:54,360 Speaker 2: his health and his ability to stay at his peak 881 00:45:54,400 --> 00:45:56,680 Speaker 2: now apply to Steph as well. So that's gonna be 882 00:45:56,719 --> 00:45:58,399 Speaker 2: That's gonna be something I have an eye on this year. 883 00:45:59,280 --> 00:46:02,160 Speaker 2: I am on Steph being healthy, and that's why I 884 00:46:02,200 --> 00:46:03,719 Speaker 2: have staff as high as he is. You guys will 885 00:46:03,719 --> 00:46:05,440 Speaker 2: see where he ranks on the list this year when 886 00:46:05,440 --> 00:46:08,120 Speaker 2: we get there, But like, I'm gonna be keeping an 887 00:46:08,160 --> 00:46:09,480 Speaker 2: eye on that because I think that's gonna play a 888 00:46:09,480 --> 00:46:12,640 Speaker 2: big role in where ranks next year. Last question, non 889 00:46:12,719 --> 00:46:16,560 Speaker 2: basketball question. So as a fan for years now, I'm 890 00:46:16,560 --> 00:46:18,240 Speaker 2: happy for you and the misses as you guys embark 891 00:46:18,280 --> 00:46:20,040 Speaker 2: on a new chapter in life and congratulations. 892 00:46:20,040 --> 00:46:20,719 Speaker 1: Thank you so much. 893 00:46:21,360 --> 00:46:23,080 Speaker 2: However, and I don't even want to ask this, but 894 00:46:23,120 --> 00:46:25,960 Speaker 2: I need to know, does this mean Two Sons podcast 895 00:46:26,080 --> 00:46:28,480 Speaker 2: is dead? I love that channel, So some of you 896 00:46:28,480 --> 00:46:30,879 Speaker 2: guys listen to my other podcasts that I do. It's 897 00:46:30,880 --> 00:46:33,040 Speaker 2: just kind of like a passion project. On the side, 898 00:46:33,120 --> 00:46:35,560 Speaker 2: I don't do it nearly as much. We only do 899 00:46:35,680 --> 00:46:39,640 Speaker 2: like maybe thirty episodes a year, but I cover Star 900 00:46:39,680 --> 00:46:42,520 Speaker 2: Wars in particular, but like all the big lore stuff 901 00:46:42,560 --> 00:46:44,200 Speaker 2: like Lord of the Rings and Game Thrones, that sort 902 00:46:44,239 --> 00:46:47,200 Speaker 2: of stuff, major TV shows and movies and stuff. With 903 00:46:47,239 --> 00:46:51,040 Speaker 2: my best friend Luke, and we haven't done an episode 904 00:46:51,080 --> 00:46:52,920 Speaker 2: in a while, in large part because I was in 905 00:46:52,920 --> 00:46:57,680 Speaker 2: my busy season and right after that I immediately moved across 906 00:46:57,719 --> 00:47:00,759 Speaker 2: state lines, so it was just like super like just 907 00:47:00,760 --> 00:47:04,760 Speaker 2: a tough transition period. And Luke just had a new baby, 908 00:47:04,920 --> 00:47:06,799 Speaker 2: so like he's been dealing with that too, so we've 909 00:47:06,840 --> 00:47:10,239 Speaker 2: been kind of like not working for a while here. 910 00:47:10,280 --> 00:47:12,600 Speaker 2: But to be clear, and we did, we covered and Or, 911 00:47:12,800 --> 00:47:15,319 Speaker 2: but covering and Or was the last time that we 912 00:47:15,400 --> 00:47:18,200 Speaker 2: did episodes, and so a couple of things. First of all, 913 00:47:18,320 --> 00:47:21,000 Speaker 2: Luke's my best friend and me moving to Denver doesn't 914 00:47:21,080 --> 00:47:25,319 Speaker 2: change that, and we're gonna continue to record. We got 915 00:47:25,400 --> 00:47:28,719 Speaker 2: him set up with remote equipment and I'll just be 916 00:47:28,880 --> 00:47:31,200 Speaker 2: doing two Sons podcasts from here and we'll do it 917 00:47:31,200 --> 00:47:33,520 Speaker 2: over zoom calls. I think it'll be even funner, even 918 00:47:33,600 --> 00:47:37,120 Speaker 2: more fun for both of us because it'll be opportunities 919 00:47:37,120 --> 00:47:39,640 Speaker 2: for us to hang out again, because we'll obviously be 920 00:47:39,680 --> 00:47:43,040 Speaker 2: hanging out less being you know, nine hundred miles apart. 921 00:47:43,160 --> 00:47:46,480 Speaker 2: But yeah, we're gonna The main thing is, I'm actually 922 00:47:46,480 --> 00:47:49,040 Speaker 2: trying to work out something with him on Tuesday or 923 00:47:49,080 --> 00:47:52,000 Speaker 2: Wednesday this week because I watched the first two episodes 924 00:47:52,000 --> 00:47:54,880 Speaker 2: of Alien Earth on Hulu and I loved it, and 925 00:47:54,960 --> 00:47:57,759 Speaker 2: episode three is tomorrow night, and so I'm trying to 926 00:47:57,760 --> 00:47:58,200 Speaker 2: get Luke. 927 00:47:58,680 --> 00:47:59,600 Speaker 1: I think he's on board. 928 00:47:59,640 --> 00:48:02,000 Speaker 2: But I think we're gonna do an episode here in 929 00:48:02,040 --> 00:48:04,799 Speaker 2: the next few days that covers Alien Earth. So if 930 00:48:04,800 --> 00:48:06,719 Speaker 2: you guys want to watch along with us and just 931 00:48:06,920 --> 00:48:09,920 Speaker 2: kind of hang out on the podcast, we'll be keep 932 00:48:09,920 --> 00:48:11,719 Speaker 2: an eye on my Twitter feed over the course in 933 00:48:11,760 --> 00:48:13,160 Speaker 2: the next few days. And I'll tweet out the link. 934 00:48:13,160 --> 00:48:14,520 Speaker 2: But if you want to find the channel, it's just 935 00:48:14,800 --> 00:48:18,520 Speaker 2: two Suns podcast. It's a whole YouTube channel if you 936 00:48:18,560 --> 00:48:21,560 Speaker 2: go back there. Like every Star Wars book we've read, 937 00:48:21,600 --> 00:48:24,080 Speaker 2: we've done an episode on Star Wars movies, that sort 938 00:48:24,080 --> 00:48:26,480 Speaker 2: of thing. Like We've done a ton of content over 939 00:48:26,480 --> 00:48:29,120 Speaker 2: the years that I think, especially when you're doing TVs 940 00:48:29,120 --> 00:48:30,320 Speaker 2: and TV and movie. 941 00:48:30,080 --> 00:48:31,399 Speaker 1: Shows, that just still holds up. 942 00:48:31,520 --> 00:48:33,759 Speaker 2: So you guys can check out the older content there 943 00:48:33,800 --> 00:48:36,839 Speaker 2: and then again hopefully within the next three days or so, 944 00:48:37,200 --> 00:48:40,279 Speaker 2: we'll have our new episode there. But Nicholas, thanks so 945 00:48:40,400 --> 00:48:42,600 Speaker 2: much for supporting us and all of you guys that 946 00:48:42,640 --> 00:48:44,719 Speaker 2: do listen to that show. Thanks and if you guys 947 00:48:44,760 --> 00:48:46,080 Speaker 2: want to check it out, you guys know where to 948 00:48:46,080 --> 00:48:47,800 Speaker 2: find it. But that's all I have for today is 949 00:48:47,800 --> 00:48:49,759 Speaker 2: always as sincerely appreciate you guys for supporting me and 950 00:48:49,800 --> 00:48:53,920 Speaker 2: suporting the show. We'll be back on Monday with number nine, 951 00:48:54,320 --> 00:48:56,840 Speaker 2: number nine, and I will see you guys no. Number 952 00:48:56,840 --> 00:48:58,640 Speaker 2: eight because number nine is Jaylen Brunts and we just 953 00:48:58,680 --> 00:49:00,719 Speaker 2: hit so I'll see you guys on my day for 954 00:49:00,920 --> 00:49:09,080 Speaker 2: number eighth,