WEBVTT - Playoff Jimmy Does it Again, Lakers Lose, & Nickstradamus

0:00:01.720 --> 0:00:04.480
<v Speaker 1>This episode is brought to you by Unstoppable. Discover the

0:00:04.519 --> 0:00:07.880
<v Speaker 1>inspiring true story about Anthony Roebliss, who defined every expectation

0:00:07.960 --> 0:00:10.840
<v Speaker 1>to become a national wrestling champion, and Unstoppable, a new

0:00:10.880 --> 0:00:14.480
<v Speaker 1>original movie from Amazon MGM Studios and director William Goldenberg,

0:00:14.560 --> 0:00:17.720
<v Speaker 1>evoking the excitement and camaraderie of classic sports dramas and

0:00:17.760 --> 0:00:21.160
<v Speaker 1>thrilling wrestling matches. Unstoppable features an all star ensemble cast

0:00:21.239 --> 0:00:24.759
<v Speaker 1>including Jerrel Jerome, Jennifer Lopez, Don Cheatle, Michael Panya, and

0:00:24.760 --> 0:00:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Bobby Canavali. Watch Unstoppable now exclusively on Amazon Prime Video.

0:00:30.320 --> 0:00:33.200
<v Speaker 2>This episode is brought to you by all State. Some

0:00:33.240 --> 0:00:36.080
<v Speaker 2>people just know they could save hundreds on car insurance

0:00:36.120 --> 0:00:38.800
<v Speaker 2>by checking all State first. Like you know, to check

0:00:38.840 --> 0:00:42.400
<v Speaker 2>the date of the Big Game first before you accidentally

0:00:42.400 --> 0:00:45.440
<v Speaker 2>buy tickets on your twentieth wedding anniversary and have to

0:00:45.440 --> 0:00:47.879
<v Speaker 2>spend the next twenty years of your marriage making up

0:00:47.880 --> 0:00:51.479
<v Speaker 2>for it. Yeah, checking first is smart, So check all

0:00:51.520 --> 0:00:53.840
<v Speaker 2>State first for a quote that could save you hundreds.

0:00:53.960 --> 0:00:56.880
<v Speaker 2>You're in good hands with all States savings. Very terms apply.

0:00:56.960 --> 0:01:12.319
<v Speaker 2>All State Fire and Casualty Insurance Company and Affiliates, Northbrook, Illinois, all.

0:01:12.360 --> 0:01:14.479
<v Speaker 3>Right, Welcome in What's Drave with Nick Wright, Episode one

0:01:14.800 --> 0:01:18.840
<v Speaker 3>forty six after an insane day in the NBA Playoffs,

0:01:18.880 --> 0:01:21.280
<v Speaker 3>movie the NFL Draft, and i'd apologies for those of

0:01:21.319 --> 0:01:24.600
<v Speaker 3>you watching us live on YouTube. Hopefully you're able to

0:01:24.640 --> 0:01:27.119
<v Speaker 3>watch us live on YouTube right now. We had some

0:01:27.160 --> 0:01:29.959
<v Speaker 3>slight technical difficulties, but we have too big of a

0:01:30.000 --> 0:01:33.240
<v Speaker 3>show to let that derail us. Here is what did

0:01:33.280 --> 0:01:37.160
<v Speaker 3>not make the cut for today's show. Not on today's

0:01:37.160 --> 0:01:40.160
<v Speaker 3>show is the great news, however, that John Meetchi is

0:01:40.200 --> 0:01:43.120
<v Speaker 3>returning to the field. The Texans draft pick last year,

0:01:43.400 --> 0:01:48.800
<v Speaker 3>Cincinnati picking up Joe Burrow's option, Washington, in my opinion,

0:01:48.960 --> 0:01:54.040
<v Speaker 3>shockingly declining Chase Young's option. I understand he has dealt

0:01:54.040 --> 0:01:56.880
<v Speaker 3>with significant injuries. This was the number two overall pick,

0:01:56.920 --> 0:01:59.560
<v Speaker 3>the defensive rookie of the year. To turn down his

0:01:59.640 --> 0:02:03.760
<v Speaker 3>option is shocking to me, and Kawhi Leonard is not shocking.

0:02:03.800 --> 0:02:08.400
<v Speaker 3>It is wildly unfortunate tears his meniscus. However, none of

0:02:08.440 --> 0:02:12.600
<v Speaker 3>that is the lead. Not. Last night in the NBA

0:02:12.680 --> 0:02:19.079
<v Speaker 3>Playoffs involved the Warriors showing they are still the champs,

0:02:19.440 --> 0:02:25.280
<v Speaker 3>the Lakers falling flat bing Bong, the Knicks dispatching of

0:02:25.320 --> 0:02:29.400
<v Speaker 3>the Cavs in five. However, we can't lead with any

0:02:29.440 --> 0:02:33.600
<v Speaker 3>of those stories because DIORA one of the most shocking

0:02:33.840 --> 0:02:38.160
<v Speaker 3>first round upsets and one of the most shocking consecutive

0:02:38.240 --> 0:02:42.919
<v Speaker 3>fourth quarters I've ever seen from a title favorite happened.

0:02:43.320 --> 0:02:45.560
<v Speaker 3>Let's get right into it. DIORA where we're start.

0:02:45.800 --> 0:02:48.400
<v Speaker 4>Okay, so the Bucks are out? Yeah, for the second

0:02:48.440 --> 0:02:51.080
<v Speaker 4>game in a row playoff, Jimmy dragged the Heat back

0:02:51.120 --> 0:02:54.239
<v Speaker 4>from the dead. It's the first time a number one

0:02:54.240 --> 0:02:57.400
<v Speaker 4>seed is lost to a play and team. Was this

0:02:57.480 --> 0:03:02.240
<v Speaker 4>more legacy solidifying for Jimmy Butler or legacy damning for Giannis?

0:03:02.280 --> 0:03:08.760
<v Speaker 3>All Right, Jimmy Butler in this series was almost as

0:03:08.800 --> 0:03:13.840
<v Speaker 3>good as any player has ever been in any series.

0:03:14.240 --> 0:03:17.640
<v Speaker 3>I know that sounds crazy, but when you consider the

0:03:17.680 --> 0:03:19.680
<v Speaker 3>fact that the Heat were one of the lowest scoring

0:03:19.680 --> 0:03:23.280
<v Speaker 3>teams in basketball in the regular season, they lost their

0:03:23.320 --> 0:03:26.760
<v Speaker 3>second best scorer for the series in the first game

0:03:26.800 --> 0:03:31.160
<v Speaker 3>of this series. They lost Victor Oladipo in the fourth

0:03:31.200 --> 0:03:33.200
<v Speaker 3>game of this series, or the third or fourth game

0:03:33.200 --> 0:03:36.800
<v Speaker 3>of this series. They were playing the number one seed

0:03:37.200 --> 0:03:42.600
<v Speaker 3>with the previously unanimously accepted best player alive, and Jimmy

0:03:42.640 --> 0:03:49.600
<v Speaker 3>Butler averaged thirty eight, six and five on sixty percent

0:03:49.680 --> 0:03:54.200
<v Speaker 3>from the field and forty four percent from three. It's

0:03:54.360 --> 0:03:59.000
<v Speaker 3>unprecedented that Jimmy Butler in these last two I'll just

0:03:59.040 --> 0:04:02.440
<v Speaker 3>give you his numbers in each of the five games

0:04:02.520 --> 0:04:06.760
<v Speaker 3>against the one seed Bucks, who were double digit favorites

0:04:06.880 --> 0:04:10.440
<v Speaker 3>last night and minus twelve hundred favorites for the series.

0:04:10.880 --> 0:04:15.600
<v Speaker 3>Game one, thirty five and eleven, win Game two, twenty

0:04:15.600 --> 0:04:17.800
<v Speaker 3>five points in a loss, and then in the three

0:04:17.960 --> 0:04:23.559
<v Speaker 3>straight wins, thirty points in Game three. Then Giannis comes back.

0:04:23.680 --> 0:04:26.240
<v Speaker 3>The Bucks are on the brink. The Bucks are up

0:04:26.920 --> 0:04:33.599
<v Speaker 3>twelve points midway through the fourth quarter of Game four,

0:04:34.360 --> 0:04:39.640
<v Speaker 3>Jimmy fifty six and nine and last night forty two

0:04:39.760 --> 0:04:43.920
<v Speaker 3>to eight. The Heat were down sixteen in the fourth.

0:04:44.240 --> 0:04:47.839
<v Speaker 3>He dragged them back. He forced overtime with a buzzer beater.

0:04:48.200 --> 0:04:52.200
<v Speaker 3>He played forty six minutes. That is ninety eight points

0:04:52.240 --> 0:04:56.760
<v Speaker 3>in consecutive playoff games, the second most NBA history to

0:04:56.880 --> 0:05:01.640
<v Speaker 3>Michael Jordan's ninety nine points in the ninety three postseason.

0:05:02.000 --> 0:05:06.359
<v Speaker 3>Jimmy Butler took this team to the finals three years ago,

0:05:07.080 --> 0:05:10.160
<v Speaker 3>last year Game seven Easter Ramics Finals, and now is

0:05:10.240 --> 0:05:14.360
<v Speaker 3>upset the Bucks. All credit to Jimmy. He is a

0:05:14.600 --> 0:05:19.960
<v Speaker 3>dominant playoff performer. He is a superstar. He is without question,

0:05:20.839 --> 0:05:24.600
<v Speaker 3>one of the top ten, top maybe top eight guys

0:05:24.640 --> 0:05:29.120
<v Speaker 3>you would want for a postseason run. Now to the

0:05:29.160 --> 0:05:32.839
<v Speaker 3>bigger story, which is the Bucks. This is not legacy

0:05:32.960 --> 0:05:41.280
<v Speaker 3>defining for Giannis, but it goes on the resume. You

0:05:41.360 --> 0:05:45.280
<v Speaker 3>were the one seed you lost in round one in

0:05:45.640 --> 0:05:49.920
<v Speaker 3>five and we'll talk big picture stuff with Giannis in

0:05:49.960 --> 0:05:55.240
<v Speaker 3>a moment. But this game last night, the Heat deserves credit,

0:05:55.600 --> 0:06:03.040
<v Speaker 3>Spoe deserves credit. Jimmy obviously deserves credit. Also, I cannot

0:06:03.080 --> 0:06:09.920
<v Speaker 3>remember in sports a time where a coach in real

0:06:10.120 --> 0:06:16.280
<v Speaker 3>time panicked and froze more than we saw Mike Budenholtz

0:06:16.480 --> 0:06:22.559
<v Speaker 3>last night. So some context on the end of that game.

0:06:24.200 --> 0:06:28.560
<v Speaker 3>The Bucks are up two right now, actually, let me

0:06:28.640 --> 0:06:33.120
<v Speaker 3>back up a little, well, they're up one. There's a

0:06:33.320 --> 0:06:36.360
<v Speaker 3>They almost turn the ball over, probably should have been

0:06:36.360 --> 0:06:40.040
<v Speaker 3>a turnover. They call a foul on Kyle Lowry, the

0:06:40.080 --> 0:06:44.279
<v Speaker 3>heat challenge gets overturned jump ball, the Bucks win the tip,

0:06:44.920 --> 0:06:48.800
<v Speaker 3>and then Giannis, my guy who struggled mightily from the

0:06:48.800 --> 0:06:51.120
<v Speaker 3>free throw line last night, ten of thirty and twenty

0:06:51.160 --> 0:06:56.800
<v Speaker 3>three thirteen misses, was so nervous about shooting free throws,

0:06:57.080 --> 0:07:01.400
<v Speaker 3>he tried to throw the ball away again. That then

0:07:01.600 --> 0:07:07.080
<v Speaker 3>led to Drew Holiday save or Chris Middleton save. Drew

0:07:07.160 --> 0:07:10.480
<v Speaker 3>Holliday gets it. Drew Holiday goes one of two from

0:07:10.480 --> 0:07:16.320
<v Speaker 3>the line. The Heat drop a brilliant play, Butler catches it,

0:07:16.760 --> 0:07:20.440
<v Speaker 3>tosses it in while falling backwards. It's now a tie game.

0:07:21.680 --> 0:07:26.080
<v Speaker 3>There was half a second left and the Bucks had

0:07:26.280 --> 0:07:31.320
<v Speaker 3>a time out. If you call time out, you get

0:07:31.360 --> 0:07:35.400
<v Speaker 3>to advance the ball to half court instead. Bud just

0:07:35.480 --> 0:07:38.000
<v Speaker 3>stood there. They inbound the ball. They don't even get

0:07:38.000 --> 0:07:44.960
<v Speaker 3>a shot off. That's a disaster. It can't happen. There

0:07:45.040 --> 0:07:47.840
<v Speaker 3>is no reason not to call time out there other

0:07:47.920 --> 0:07:52.000
<v Speaker 3>than you were panicked. But the problem even with the

0:07:52.040 --> 0:07:56.600
<v Speaker 3>panic is you have to know in the huddle before

0:07:56.720 --> 0:08:01.680
<v Speaker 3>the Heat have their final possession, if they score, we

0:08:01.760 --> 0:08:05.040
<v Speaker 3>are calling time out. He must have thought if they score,

0:08:05.080 --> 0:08:08.880
<v Speaker 3>there won't be enough time, so be it. It's still

0:08:09.000 --> 0:08:13.840
<v Speaker 3>impossibly bad. Then at the end of the game, you

0:08:13.880 --> 0:08:17.240
<v Speaker 3>don't get a shot off and your season ends with

0:08:17.360 --> 0:08:22.040
<v Speaker 3>the ball in Grayson Allen's hands, Grayson Allen with him

0:08:22.080 --> 0:08:25.960
<v Speaker 3>not taking a shot once again. There the Bucks had

0:08:25.960 --> 0:08:29.200
<v Speaker 3>two timeouts could have drawn something up. If you want

0:08:29.200 --> 0:08:31.840
<v Speaker 3>to let them run and transition, so be it. But

0:08:32.040 --> 0:08:35.080
<v Speaker 3>once you see the play has devolved to the point

0:08:35.679 --> 0:08:39.800
<v Speaker 3>that Grayson Allen has the ball, with your season on

0:08:40.000 --> 0:08:47.320
<v Speaker 3>the line, you must call time out. I would not

0:08:47.400 --> 0:08:50.560
<v Speaker 3>be surprised if Bud gets fired for this. I know

0:08:50.600 --> 0:08:53.200
<v Speaker 3>he won a championship two years ago. Nick Nurse won

0:08:53.280 --> 0:08:57.800
<v Speaker 3>a championship three years ago. He was let go this week.

0:08:57.960 --> 0:09:02.080
<v Speaker 3>Frank Vogel won a championship. Well hold on, so I

0:09:02.080 --> 0:09:04.960
<v Speaker 3>guess Nick Nurse won a championship four years ago. He

0:09:05.080 --> 0:09:08.160
<v Speaker 3>was fired this week. Frank Bogel won a championship three

0:09:08.280 --> 0:09:11.080
<v Speaker 3>years ago. He was fired before the season. Bud won

0:09:11.160 --> 0:09:16.520
<v Speaker 3>a championship two years ago. It in tough times, man,

0:09:17.360 --> 0:09:25.160
<v Speaker 3>tough times now on Yiannis and the legacy stuff I

0:09:25.280 --> 0:09:30.640
<v Speaker 3>have been saying, and I think smart people agree that

0:09:30.800 --> 0:09:34.320
<v Speaker 3>it is not a debate who the best player in

0:09:34.360 --> 0:09:41.040
<v Speaker 3>the world is. It's Yannis, dominant defensive player, unstoppable offensive force.

0:09:41.760 --> 0:09:45.320
<v Speaker 3>And it has always irritated me when people are like, h,

0:09:45.320 --> 0:09:48.720
<v Speaker 3>he can't shoot, because who gives it If he can't shoot?

0:09:48.840 --> 0:09:52.520
<v Speaker 3>When he's that effective, super efficient, no one can stop

0:09:52.600 --> 0:09:56.040
<v Speaker 3>him from getting to the basket, and last night he

0:09:56.200 --> 0:09:58.760
<v Speaker 3>damned near out of forty and twenty, so it's hard

0:09:58.800 --> 0:10:03.320
<v Speaker 3>to lay it all at his feet. However, last night

0:10:04.360 --> 0:10:10.200
<v Speaker 3>and in this series, his inability to create a shot

0:10:11.360 --> 0:10:14.880
<v Speaker 3>and his free throw woes, which we saw him go

0:10:15.080 --> 0:10:18.280
<v Speaker 3>seventeen of nineteen in a finals game to win the

0:10:18.320 --> 0:10:22.000
<v Speaker 3>title and score fifty. His free throw woes were so

0:10:22.320 --> 0:10:26.880
<v Speaker 3>bad in this series that for the first time, his

0:10:27.120 --> 0:10:34.800
<v Speaker 3>inability to shoot really cost them. And so we've got

0:10:34.840 --> 0:10:36.839
<v Speaker 3>to wait and see how the rest of these playoffs

0:10:37.080 --> 0:10:41.480
<v Speaker 3>finish out. And I obviously don't believe the Warriors are

0:10:41.520 --> 0:10:47.800
<v Speaker 3>gonna win the title, but if they do, I think

0:10:47.840 --> 0:10:50.040
<v Speaker 3>Steph Curry gets to claim I'm the best player in

0:10:50.040 --> 0:10:54.160
<v Speaker 3>the world. That wasn't no super team last year they

0:10:54.200 --> 0:10:57.040
<v Speaker 3>won the title. If they win it again with Giannis

0:10:57.040 --> 0:10:59.800
<v Speaker 3>in two straight years going out in second round and

0:10:59.880 --> 0:11:04.280
<v Speaker 3>row one, I think step might get the throne. If

0:11:04.280 --> 0:11:09.120
<v Speaker 3>the Nuggets win the title, Jokic maybe as a claim.

0:11:09.800 --> 0:11:14.240
<v Speaker 3>I it is the point I am making is Giannis

0:11:14.280 --> 0:11:17.560
<v Speaker 3>didn't have to win the title in order to keep

0:11:18.480 --> 0:11:23.400
<v Speaker 3>best player alive as undeniably his but going out in

0:11:23.480 --> 0:11:27.480
<v Speaker 3>round one in five blowing back to back double digit

0:11:27.559 --> 0:11:32.040
<v Speaker 3>fourth quarter leads against an eight seeded Heat team that

0:11:32.240 --> 0:11:35.160
<v Speaker 3>lost one playing game to the Hawks and damn near

0:11:35.240 --> 0:11:39.400
<v Speaker 3>lost a second playing game to the Bulls. Yikes, man,

0:11:40.840 --> 0:11:44.560
<v Speaker 3>that's a tough one. I love the guy. And now

0:11:44.600 --> 0:11:46.959
<v Speaker 3>everyone saw about his postgame comments. Do you or what's

0:11:47.000 --> 0:11:47.840
<v Speaker 3>our question there?

0:11:48.360 --> 0:11:51.240
<v Speaker 4>So what do you think about his comments about failure

0:11:51.360 --> 0:11:51.960
<v Speaker 4>after the game.

0:11:52.160 --> 0:11:57.520
<v Speaker 3>So he was asked by Eric name nem name, I'm

0:11:57.559 --> 0:12:01.679
<v Speaker 3>not sure, do you consider the sea a failure? And

0:12:01.720 --> 0:12:05.480
<v Speaker 3>he gave a very long, interesting answer, and he seemed

0:12:05.640 --> 0:12:08.640
<v Speaker 3>very frustrated with the question, and he's One of the

0:12:08.679 --> 0:12:11.800
<v Speaker 3>things he said was Michael Jordan played fifteen years, won

0:12:11.960 --> 0:12:18.080
<v Speaker 3>six titles. Were nine of those year's failures. And he said, basically,

0:12:18.880 --> 0:12:22.160
<v Speaker 3>he is a great guy. I love Giannis and he

0:12:22.240 --> 0:12:33.319
<v Speaker 3>seemed genuine in earnest. Also, this season, by any fair definition,

0:12:34.440 --> 0:12:41.200
<v Speaker 3>was a failure. Not It's not as reductive as there's

0:12:41.280 --> 0:12:46.040
<v Speaker 3>thirty teams. One team wins the title, twenty nine teams don't.

0:12:46.320 --> 0:12:49.880
<v Speaker 3>Twenty nine teams failed. That's not what I'm saying. There

0:12:49.880 --> 0:12:56.280
<v Speaker 3>are different levels of success or failure. So I would argue,

0:12:56.320 --> 0:13:00.360
<v Speaker 3>let's take the Dallas Mavericks. Last year, the Mavericks did

0:13:00.400 --> 0:13:02.560
<v Speaker 3>not win the title. They made it to the Western

0:13:02.600 --> 0:13:06.760
<v Speaker 3>Conference finals. Last year was a massive success for them,

0:13:07.160 --> 0:13:09.720
<v Speaker 3>even though they didn't win the title. They overachieved someone.

0:13:09.800 --> 0:13:13.319
<v Speaker 3>They went on a deep playoff run. This year they

0:13:13.320 --> 0:13:20.400
<v Speaker 3>didn't even make the playoffs. It's an unmitigated failure the

0:13:20.400 --> 0:13:24.040
<v Speaker 3>the A four Lakers made it all the way to

0:13:24.120 --> 0:13:28.600
<v Speaker 3>the finals and then got routed in the finals. I

0:13:28.679 --> 0:13:31.040
<v Speaker 3>think that season for them, it was the last year

0:13:31.040 --> 0:13:33.400
<v Speaker 3>of Shaq and Kobe together. They had brought him alone,

0:13:33.440 --> 0:13:35.400
<v Speaker 3>they had brought in Bayton. They put all their eggs

0:13:35.440 --> 0:13:39.240
<v Speaker 3>in that basket. For them, it was championship or bust.

0:13:40.200 --> 0:13:42.640
<v Speaker 3>Anything short of a championship for that team would have

0:13:42.640 --> 0:13:45.760
<v Speaker 3>been a failure. Last year Celtics made it to the finals,

0:13:46.080 --> 0:13:51.120
<v Speaker 3>lost massive successful season. There's nuances to this. There is

0:13:51.240 --> 0:13:56.320
<v Speaker 3>no nuance to this. You are the Vegas favorite, you

0:13:56.360 --> 0:14:00.839
<v Speaker 3>are the number one seed. You have Theore, the best

0:14:00.880 --> 0:14:05.640
<v Speaker 3>player in the world. He is back for Game four,

0:14:06.160 --> 0:14:10.480
<v Speaker 3>You are up double digits in the fourth quarter, You lose.

0:14:10.880 --> 0:14:14.960
<v Speaker 3>He is back for Game five at home. You are

0:14:15.040 --> 0:14:19.320
<v Speaker 3>up sixteen in the fourth quarter, You lose. That is

0:14:19.360 --> 0:14:26.600
<v Speaker 3>a failure. If I said I want there's gonna be

0:14:26.640 --> 0:14:32.000
<v Speaker 3>a there's gonna be a vote taken best sports talk

0:14:32.080 --> 0:14:36.760
<v Speaker 3>show in the world. I want first things first to

0:14:36.800 --> 0:14:43.160
<v Speaker 3>win it. And in the first round of the voting,

0:14:43.880 --> 0:14:51.040
<v Speaker 3>I get routed by somebody's cable access stream show. That's

0:14:51.080 --> 0:14:55.920
<v Speaker 3>a failure. So this I and there's a lot of

0:14:56.000 --> 0:15:00.560
<v Speaker 3>athletes coming to Giannis's defense. I don't again. Giannis is

0:15:00.560 --> 0:15:04.280
<v Speaker 3>a great dude, one of my favorite players ever, and

0:15:04.320 --> 0:15:11.520
<v Speaker 3>I understand what he's saying in theory everything. Every result

0:15:11.600 --> 0:15:16.200
<v Speaker 3>this season that could have ended with them not winning

0:15:16.200 --> 0:15:19.880
<v Speaker 3>the title would not have been by definition of failure.

0:15:20.560 --> 0:15:24.400
<v Speaker 3>Right If they make the conference finals and Joe el

0:15:24.480 --> 0:15:28.720
<v Speaker 3>Embiid the year he wins MVP, goes crazy and they

0:15:28.800 --> 0:15:31.960
<v Speaker 3>knock out the Bucks and he's just better, I don't

0:15:31.960 --> 0:15:34.760
<v Speaker 3>know that I'd call that failure. Disappointing, fell short of

0:15:34.800 --> 0:15:39.760
<v Speaker 3>your hopes, but not a failure. Losing in round one

0:15:40.440 --> 0:15:43.440
<v Speaker 3>as a one seed. I'm gonna do this off the

0:15:43.480 --> 0:15:47.200
<v Speaker 3>top of my head. But the only one seeds to

0:15:47.320 --> 0:15:52.200
<v Speaker 3>lose to eight seeds. The ninety four Nuggets beat the

0:15:52.320 --> 0:15:57.480
<v Speaker 3>Sonics in a best of five. The ninety nine Knicks

0:15:57.520 --> 0:16:00.720
<v Speaker 3>beat the Heat and the Strike Year lockout Yere in

0:16:00.800 --> 0:16:09.520
<v Speaker 3>a best of five, the I know that we believe

0:16:09.640 --> 0:16:14.560
<v Speaker 3>Warriors beat the Mavericks in O seven. I know the

0:16:14.600 --> 0:16:19.280
<v Speaker 3>Grizzlies beat the Spurs in ten or eleven. The Bulls

0:16:19.320 --> 0:16:22.040
<v Speaker 3>lost as a one seed in a year that Derek

0:16:22.160 --> 0:16:25.160
<v Speaker 3>Rose blew out his knee, and I'm leaving one or

0:16:25.200 --> 0:16:30.680
<v Speaker 3>two out. But it's only happened like seven or eight times.

0:16:30.400 --> 0:16:34.800
<v Speaker 3>It is a failure. It doesn't mean you're a failure

0:16:36.000 --> 0:16:39.120
<v Speaker 3>as a person, as a basketballyer's anything. Your season was

0:16:39.160 --> 0:16:44.880
<v Speaker 3>a failure, and it is this to me, just sidebar

0:16:44.880 --> 0:16:47.520
<v Speaker 3>before we get to the other stuff. This to me

0:16:47.680 --> 0:16:53.520
<v Speaker 3>is where at times social media can turn into diora

0:16:54.440 --> 0:16:58.160
<v Speaker 3>a bit of like group think what Dan Levittard would

0:16:58.200 --> 0:17:02.760
<v Speaker 3>call captain easystance. So this reporter says, was your season

0:17:02.760 --> 0:17:08.040
<v Speaker 3>of failure? Jannis gives a thoughtful answer, and everyone the

0:17:08.160 --> 0:17:12.160
<v Speaker 3>balls start rolling downhill on that reporters a clown. Jannis

0:17:12.240 --> 0:17:16.320
<v Speaker 3>is the greatest, and everyone starts kind of parroting the

0:17:16.359 --> 0:17:21.760
<v Speaker 3>same opinion. When I think privately, anyone that's a sports

0:17:21.800 --> 0:17:26.280
<v Speaker 3>fan says, hey, would you consider this Bucks season when

0:17:26.280 --> 0:17:29.960
<v Speaker 3>they were you had to if you bet one hundred

0:17:30.000 --> 0:17:32.640
<v Speaker 3>dollars on the Bucks to win this series? You would

0:17:32.680 --> 0:17:36.000
<v Speaker 3>have won seven dollars. That's how big of a favorite

0:17:36.040 --> 0:17:40.560
<v Speaker 3>they were. And they lost in five to a Miami

0:17:40.600 --> 0:17:43.240
<v Speaker 3>Heat team that lost Tyler Hero in Game one? Would

0:17:43.280 --> 0:17:46.880
<v Speaker 3>you consider that a failure? Everyone would say yes, of course.

0:17:48.359 --> 0:17:53.840
<v Speaker 3>So I I love Yiannis. Go ahead, nothing, no speak

0:17:53.880 --> 0:17:54.119
<v Speaker 3>on it.

0:17:54.640 --> 0:17:54.680
<v Speaker 5>No.

0:17:54.800 --> 0:17:56.680
<v Speaker 4>I was just gonna say, you really can't talk about

0:17:56.680 --> 0:17:57.480
<v Speaker 4>the Bucks for an hour?

0:17:57.600 --> 0:18:00.520
<v Speaker 3>Huh oh, yeah, that's true. I said, all, my ge.

0:18:00.600 --> 0:18:04.560
<v Speaker 4>You spent the entire the entire time a talking about

0:18:04.600 --> 0:18:05.040
<v Speaker 4>the Bucks.

0:18:05.400 --> 0:18:07.440
<v Speaker 3>Is it one of the crazies if you guys don't

0:18:07.440 --> 0:18:09.600
<v Speaker 3>know what you were referring to. She heard me do

0:18:09.760 --> 0:18:12.640
<v Speaker 3>my conference call for First Things First today and we

0:18:12.640 --> 0:18:14.240
<v Speaker 3>were talking about what's going to be in the show

0:18:14.280 --> 0:18:16.840
<v Speaker 3>because there's so much to discuss, and I said, I

0:18:16.880 --> 0:18:19.399
<v Speaker 3>could talk about this Bucks game for six hours. I

0:18:19.400 --> 0:18:24.080
<v Speaker 3>mean there's things we haven't even gotten to. But uh yeah,

0:18:24.240 --> 0:18:30.200
<v Speaker 3>I mean it's a historic upset, and Gianni's comments were

0:18:30.200 --> 0:18:33.719
<v Speaker 3>interesting and Jimmy Butler's unbelievable and it was I mean

0:18:33.760 --> 0:18:36.159
<v Speaker 3>it was it was out of this world, all right.

0:18:36.200 --> 0:18:37.840
<v Speaker 3>And also I don't want to talk that much about

0:18:37.840 --> 0:18:39.160
<v Speaker 3>the Lakers, so I kind of fill a buster.

0:18:39.359 --> 0:18:43.400
<v Speaker 4>Next on TV. You said that the keys to the

0:18:43.560 --> 0:18:46.960
<v Speaker 4>keys to the Lakers winning were a big a D

0:18:47.119 --> 0:18:50.159
<v Speaker 4>game and a triple J and Triple J getting in

0:18:50.200 --> 0:18:53.680
<v Speaker 4>foul trouble. Yeah, check jack, Well both happened.

0:18:53.440 --> 0:18:56.160
<v Speaker 3>I also said, and Dylan Brooks taking a bunch of threes,

0:18:56.200 --> 0:18:58.080
<v Speaker 3>and yeah, mood, that happened too.

0:18:58.320 --> 0:19:00.480
<v Speaker 4>And the Lakers still lost.

0:19:00.560 --> 0:19:01.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, they did got blown out.

0:19:01.840 --> 0:19:06.400
<v Speaker 4>Could it be because Lebron was shooting at Russell Westbrook levels?

0:19:06.920 --> 0:19:08.120
<v Speaker 4>Does that to mean no?

0:19:08.160 --> 0:19:10.800
<v Speaker 3>I mean, well, just go ahead finish your second question.

0:19:11.520 --> 0:19:14.840
<v Speaker 4>What I meant to say is was it because he

0:19:14.880 --> 0:19:17.200
<v Speaker 4>was shooting at Dylan brook levels? From three?

0:19:17.359 --> 0:19:17.840
<v Speaker 3>Okay?

0:19:18.400 --> 0:19:21.280
<v Speaker 4>What's he shooting three over twenty eight from three over

0:19:21.320 --> 0:19:22.480
<v Speaker 4>the last four games?

0:19:22.560 --> 0:19:25.040
<v Speaker 3>Three of twenty eight from three? It's not good.

0:19:25.359 --> 0:19:29.480
<v Speaker 4>It's like, so, are you worried yet about your Lakers

0:19:29.520 --> 0:19:31.000
<v Speaker 4>and your precious Lebron King?

0:19:31.440 --> 0:19:36.800
<v Speaker 3>Okay, not worried they're gonna win Game six? Worry, not

0:19:36.880 --> 0:19:39.800
<v Speaker 3>worried at all. Not scared they're gonna win Game six

0:19:39.840 --> 0:19:46.440
<v Speaker 3>at home. However, Athony Davis was excellent. Triple J did

0:19:46.480 --> 0:19:49.200
<v Speaker 3>get in foul trouble, Dylan Brooks did try to shoot

0:19:49.200 --> 0:19:54.440
<v Speaker 3>the grizl did lose, and it was because Lebron was awful,

0:19:55.480 --> 0:20:00.280
<v Speaker 3>No way around it, Lebro, You're entitled to a bad game.

0:20:00.960 --> 0:20:04.159
<v Speaker 4>Lebron went like seven, anybody else does it. No, so

0:20:04.359 --> 0:20:05.360
<v Speaker 4>this isn't a failure.

0:20:06.040 --> 0:20:08.879
<v Speaker 3>Oh no, if they lose the series, if they end

0:20:08.920 --> 0:20:11.439
<v Speaker 3>up blowing a three to one lead, that would be

0:20:11.480 --> 0:20:14.120
<v Speaker 3>a failure. Now it's weird because they're the seventh seed

0:20:14.200 --> 0:20:16.640
<v Speaker 3>and the Grizzlies are the two seed, so it's kind

0:20:16.680 --> 0:20:18.439
<v Speaker 3>of the inverse of what had happened before. But they

0:20:18.440 --> 0:20:22.360
<v Speaker 3>were up three to one. But no, you're not teams

0:20:22.400 --> 0:20:25.760
<v Speaker 3>don't sweep other good teams in the playoffs. You're going

0:20:25.800 --> 0:20:30.800
<v Speaker 3>to lose games. And everyone is entitled to bad playoff games.

0:20:30.880 --> 0:20:36.000
<v Speaker 3>Lebron spoiled us because he went about seven years without

0:20:36.000 --> 0:20:39.359
<v Speaker 3>a truly bad playoff game. Look it up twenty twelve

0:20:39.400 --> 0:20:42.320
<v Speaker 3>to twenty eighteen. Someone find me the truly bad playoff

0:20:42.359 --> 0:20:46.439
<v Speaker 3>game Lebron played. It just didn't happen, but he did

0:20:46.560 --> 0:20:50.600
<v Speaker 3>last night. He was bad and he is. He's not

0:20:50.680 --> 0:20:53.359
<v Speaker 3>the only reason they lost, but they can't win with

0:20:53.440 --> 0:20:55.800
<v Speaker 3>him playing that way. He knows that he said it

0:20:55.840 --> 0:20:59.399
<v Speaker 3>after the game. I'm not afraid to say that. I

0:20:59.480 --> 0:21:02.600
<v Speaker 3>do believe Eve at home in Game six. He'll be excellent.

0:21:03.119 --> 0:21:07.800
<v Speaker 3>But this was one of the worst elimination games, close

0:21:07.840 --> 0:21:11.560
<v Speaker 3>out games I should say Lebron has ever played. He

0:21:11.800 --> 0:21:17.520
<v Speaker 3>and by the way, his shot right now is unspeakably bad.

0:21:18.600 --> 0:21:23.439
<v Speaker 3>Three of twenty eight from three is horrifying, and it

0:21:23.560 --> 0:21:27.040
<v Speaker 3>just is what it is like. If he's three of

0:21:27.080 --> 0:21:30.439
<v Speaker 3>twenty eight in the last four, that means in the

0:21:30.520 --> 0:21:34.720
<v Speaker 3>series he's six of thirty six. It's one over six.

0:21:34.880 --> 0:21:38.160
<v Speaker 3>So he's shooting seventeen percent from three in the series.

0:21:38.440 --> 0:21:43.160
<v Speaker 3>He's shooting eleven percent over the last four games. Shots

0:21:43.160 --> 0:21:45.960
<v Speaker 3>got a fall, and he's gotta be better. But the

0:21:46.080 --> 0:21:48.399
<v Speaker 3>Lakers are not gonna lose at home in Game six,

0:21:49.240 --> 0:21:53.600
<v Speaker 3>and I'm not worried about the series. I do think

0:21:53.640 --> 0:21:56.879
<v Speaker 3>something that hurt the Lakers yesterday was Dylan Brooks getting

0:21:56.880 --> 0:21:59.639
<v Speaker 3>in foul trouble and therefore having to come out of

0:21:59.680 --> 0:22:01.480
<v Speaker 3>the game. The best thing the Lakers have going for

0:22:01.560 --> 0:22:03.639
<v Speaker 3>him is Dylan Brooks playing for the Grizzlies.

0:22:04.680 --> 0:22:07.639
<v Speaker 4>Furthermore, uh, what.

0:22:10.080 --> 0:22:13.600
<v Speaker 3>The well now, you made me lose my thought. But

0:22:13.840 --> 0:22:16.439
<v Speaker 3>the the other element of last night that was so

0:22:16.640 --> 0:22:19.879
<v Speaker 3>frustrating is the Lakers played terribly in the first half

0:22:20.200 --> 0:22:23.120
<v Speaker 3>but were only down nine. And then in the third

0:22:23.200 --> 0:22:28.520
<v Speaker 3>quarter three times cut the lead to one, had a

0:22:28.600 --> 0:22:30.840
<v Speaker 3>chance to take the lead, couldn't do it. And then

0:22:30.880 --> 0:22:34.560
<v Speaker 3>the Grizzlies go on a nineteen to two run to

0:22:34.680 --> 0:22:37.320
<v Speaker 3>in the third quarter and in the game, just in

0:22:37.440 --> 0:22:41.479
<v Speaker 3>the game there. So I'm not worried about the Lakers.

0:22:41.520 --> 0:22:43.520
<v Speaker 3>But that's a terrible law. I mean, it's a terrible

0:22:43.600 --> 0:22:46.480
<v Speaker 3>Lebron performance. The Grizzlies were desperate, they were at home,

0:22:46.520 --> 0:22:48.960
<v Speaker 3>they were favorites for a reason. But ad was good

0:22:49.040 --> 0:22:52.879
<v Speaker 3>enough to win and they didn't win. Good thing. But

0:22:53.040 --> 0:22:55.520
<v Speaker 3>do you are you know what that means? Damn good,

0:22:55.640 --> 0:22:59.800
<v Speaker 3>damn good thing. Furthermore, uh that Lebron saved their ass

0:22:59.800 --> 0:23:03.320
<v Speaker 3>and gain formaan the game, win the game.

0:23:03.119 --> 0:23:04.840
<v Speaker 4>TI in Live, you're blushing.

0:23:07.520 --> 0:23:08.000
<v Speaker 3>Next.

0:23:08.400 --> 0:23:11.840
<v Speaker 4>Furthermore, we all know you love the Kings and picked

0:23:11.840 --> 0:23:14.480
<v Speaker 4>them against the Warriors, and I warned you that this

0:23:14.560 --> 0:23:16.480
<v Speaker 4>take what in age? Well, I believe that we talked

0:23:16.480 --> 0:23:19.639
<v Speaker 4>about you being wrong about the Warriors before.

0:23:19.840 --> 0:23:20.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah we did.

0:23:21.080 --> 0:23:24.399
<v Speaker 4>The Warriors went into Sacramento and won and now have

0:23:24.480 --> 0:23:27.600
<v Speaker 4>control of the series. Do you think the beam is

0:23:27.640 --> 0:23:28.760
<v Speaker 4>done being lit this year?

0:23:30.560 --> 0:23:37.040
<v Speaker 3>List in the King the Kings stop it let me

0:23:37.160 --> 0:23:41.720
<v Speaker 3>give the answer. The Kings are in a rough spot.

0:23:41.880 --> 0:23:47.160
<v Speaker 3>They needed yesterday's game. There's no denying my guy. Dearon Fox,

0:23:47.440 --> 0:23:50.880
<v Speaker 3>I know, Wilds and Brew on TV were like, Nick,

0:23:50.920 --> 0:23:53.720
<v Speaker 3>you're overreacting to the finger injury. He's gonna be fine.

0:23:53.760 --> 0:23:55.680
<v Speaker 3>He was nine of twenty five from the field. He

0:23:55.800 --> 0:23:58.480
<v Speaker 3>was three of ten from three. He started the game

0:23:58.520 --> 0:24:03.600
<v Speaker 3>out well. He then, as is likely to happen, reaggravated

0:24:03.600 --> 0:24:07.560
<v Speaker 3>the finger and wasn't as good. It obviously hampered him.

0:24:07.920 --> 0:24:17.240
<v Speaker 3>The Warriors won because They're big three were exceptional. Steph

0:24:18.119 --> 0:24:23.040
<v Speaker 3>was great, Clay was very good, and as much as

0:24:23.080 --> 0:24:28.200
<v Speaker 3>it pains me, Draymond was out of this world. Man

0:24:29.600 --> 0:24:32.560
<v Speaker 3>as one of the best Draymond game games Draymond's played

0:24:32.560 --> 0:24:38.000
<v Speaker 3>in a couple of years. And now the Kings have

0:24:38.200 --> 0:24:43.120
<v Speaker 3>to go to San Francisco to win Game six. They

0:24:43.200 --> 0:24:46.359
<v Speaker 3>do that, they'll win the series. They're not gonna lose

0:24:46.440 --> 0:24:50.359
<v Speaker 3>Game seven in Sacramento. And I still believe in the Kings,

0:24:51.040 --> 0:24:53.680
<v Speaker 3>but that was a crushing loss. There's just no way

0:24:53.720 --> 0:24:58.399
<v Speaker 3>around it. That Warriors third quarter got him, and it

0:24:58.480 --> 0:25:02.800
<v Speaker 3>is a crushing loss. And now you look bat Harrison Barnes,

0:25:02.880 --> 0:25:08.119
<v Speaker 3>by the way, still seems, you know, a little like

0:25:08.160 --> 0:25:11.640
<v Speaker 3>there was a bit of a hangover from that missing

0:25:11.720 --> 0:25:16.040
<v Speaker 3>Game four And Kevin Herder has to get going for

0:25:16.119 --> 0:25:22.280
<v Speaker 3>this team. Flatley has to get going. Kevin Herder shooting

0:25:23.400 --> 0:25:26.480
<v Speaker 3>twenty from three in this series is not going to

0:25:26.520 --> 0:25:32.400
<v Speaker 3>get it done. And luckily, if the Warriors do win

0:25:32.440 --> 0:25:35.120
<v Speaker 3>the series and I'm wrong, the Lakers will be able

0:25:35.119 --> 0:25:37.560
<v Speaker 3>to take care of them in Round two. But my

0:25:37.840 --> 0:25:42.040
<v Speaker 3>heart deer might not survive that series. Can you realize

0:25:42.119 --> 0:25:48.640
<v Speaker 3>a steph Lebron Warriors Lakers in round two of the playoffs?

0:25:49.280 --> 0:25:52.479
<v Speaker 3>What that would mean for my health and well being? Also,

0:25:53.880 --> 0:25:59.760
<v Speaker 3>I am going to be in Sacramento for what would

0:25:59.880 --> 0:26:05.919
<v Speaker 3>be Game seven of Round two, and I yesterday was

0:26:06.040 --> 0:26:13.080
<v Speaker 3>already looking at tickets for Kings Lakers in Sacramento seven. Wrong.

0:26:13.280 --> 0:26:15.520
<v Speaker 4>What'd you say you'd never expect to be wrong?

0:26:15.760 --> 0:26:19.159
<v Speaker 3>I didn't think i'd be wrong. You're right. That's why

0:26:19.359 --> 0:26:22.560
<v Speaker 3>everybody says that to me. They're like, Nick, you argue

0:26:22.600 --> 0:26:24.879
<v Speaker 3>like you don't. You don't think there's any chance of

0:26:24.920 --> 0:26:27.640
<v Speaker 3>you being wrong? Why would I think I'm going Why

0:26:27.640 --> 0:26:30.720
<v Speaker 3>would anyone ever argue something that they think is going

0:26:30.760 --> 0:26:34.280
<v Speaker 3>to be wrong. I've never understood that about people. They're like,

0:26:34.359 --> 0:26:36.840
<v Speaker 3>you argue in such a way, like you're not even

0:26:37.119 --> 0:26:40.720
<v Speaker 3>considering the possibility that you're wrong. Of course not. That's

0:26:40.720 --> 0:26:46.399
<v Speaker 3>why I'm arguing the point because I believe it. I

0:26:47.680 --> 0:26:50.240
<v Speaker 3>think the Kings are better. But the Warriors are up

0:26:50.280 --> 0:26:53.680
<v Speaker 3>three to two, and now the King's gotta wins. It's

0:26:53.720 --> 0:26:57.200
<v Speaker 3>not great. There's no way around it. I'm not gonna pretend.

0:26:59.119 --> 0:27:03.719
<v Speaker 3>I'm not gonna pretend that everything's all smiles and rainbows.

0:27:04.200 --> 0:27:08.560
<v Speaker 3>It's not great right now. It's just not next Okay.

0:27:09.280 --> 0:27:13.159
<v Speaker 4>So furthermore, the Knicks are back, too bad. Every single

0:27:13.200 --> 0:27:18.040
<v Speaker 4>New York's hoops fan hates you, every single one of them.

0:27:18.400 --> 0:27:21.359
<v Speaker 4>First Rogers comes to the Jets, and now the Knicks

0:27:21.359 --> 0:27:25.080
<v Speaker 4>won their first series in a decade. As a Knicks

0:27:25.119 --> 0:27:27.760
<v Speaker 4>hater and a Lucas super fan, how tough is it

0:27:27.800 --> 0:27:29.680
<v Speaker 4>to see Jalen Brunson become a real star?

0:27:30.400 --> 0:27:33.760
<v Speaker 3>All Right, I'm happy for Jalen Brunson. Obviously this really

0:27:33.800 --> 0:27:40.240
<v Speaker 3>stings the MAVs. But let me, let's talk about the

0:27:40.280 --> 0:27:44.760
<v Speaker 3>elephant in the room here. Because you nailed it, Knicks

0:27:44.800 --> 0:27:47.600
<v Speaker 3>fans hate me. I didn't want him to hate me,

0:27:48.560 --> 0:27:54.840
<v Speaker 3>just happened, you know, organically, because I did not believe

0:27:56.160 --> 0:28:00.960
<v Speaker 3>in the Knicks as a serious playoff contender. I thought

0:28:01.040 --> 0:28:03.960
<v Speaker 3>that they were, that Tibbs teams were playing at their

0:28:04.000 --> 0:28:07.280
<v Speaker 3>playoff intensity in the regular season, that they wouldn't be

0:28:07.320 --> 0:28:11.399
<v Speaker 3>able to get to that next level. Instead, it was

0:28:11.480 --> 0:28:14.480
<v Speaker 3>the Calves that couldn't get to that next level. And

0:28:14.600 --> 0:28:19.960
<v Speaker 3>then on top of that, you now have the Bucks

0:28:20.200 --> 0:28:24.600
<v Speaker 3>collapsing to the heat, and all of a sudden, the

0:28:24.720 --> 0:28:29.640
<v Speaker 3>Knicks are favorites with home court advantage to make the

0:28:29.760 --> 0:28:34.359
<v Speaker 3>conference finals. That part nobody saw coming.

0:28:34.480 --> 0:28:36.560
<v Speaker 4>Do you think you owe the Knicks fans an apology?

0:28:40.080 --> 0:28:46.040
<v Speaker 3>I mean a little bit. Maybe I suppose that you

0:28:46.160 --> 0:28:49.440
<v Speaker 3>could one could argue that I owe the Knicks fans

0:28:49.480 --> 0:28:54.240
<v Speaker 3>in apology. I don't. I don't know what they want

0:28:54.320 --> 0:28:57.239
<v Speaker 3>from me, other than if an apology will do it,

0:28:57.320 --> 0:29:01.040
<v Speaker 3>I'll give it to them. But I I'm in a

0:29:01.080 --> 0:29:09.280
<v Speaker 3>weird spot where I think I was saying what most

0:29:09.360 --> 0:29:12.840
<v Speaker 3>people believed about the Knicks. I just, all of a

0:29:12.880 --> 0:29:16.320
<v Speaker 3>sudden get tarred as if I'm the only person that

0:29:16.440 --> 0:29:20.440
<v Speaker 3>thought this Knicks team was not a real contender. I'm

0:29:20.480 --> 0:29:22.560
<v Speaker 3>not the only person who thought this next team was

0:29:22.560 --> 0:29:25.080
<v Speaker 3>not a real contender, but such is life. I give

0:29:25.120 --> 0:29:28.560
<v Speaker 3>them credit. They lost Julis Randall yesterday, they didn't miss

0:29:28.560 --> 0:29:31.479
<v Speaker 3>a beat. They made the Calves all of a sudden

0:29:32.200 --> 0:29:36.560
<v Speaker 3>are going to be in real rough shape as far

0:29:36.640 --> 0:29:40.960
<v Speaker 3>as what their offseason looks like. And the Knicks are

0:29:41.080 --> 0:29:46.320
<v Speaker 3>favored at home to go to the conference finals. Nobody

0:29:46.360 --> 0:29:49.440
<v Speaker 3>could have saw that coming. Nobody did see that coming.

0:29:49.920 --> 0:29:53.680
<v Speaker 3>But credit to them. I mean, they they did what

0:29:53.760 --> 0:29:57.320
<v Speaker 3>they did. They deserve massive credit. I did not think

0:29:57.360 --> 0:30:00.960
<v Speaker 3>they could do it, and they did it. And that

0:30:01.040 --> 0:30:04.040
<v Speaker 3>one I told Knicks fans when they were all mad

0:30:04.040 --> 0:30:06.520
<v Speaker 3>at me, I said, listen, I'm not. They were like, oh,

0:30:06.560 --> 0:30:09.400
<v Speaker 3>you're trolling for clicks. I'm not trolling for clicks. It's

0:30:09.400 --> 0:30:12.000
<v Speaker 3>what I believe. If I'm wrong, I'll wear it. I

0:30:12.080 --> 0:30:13.960
<v Speaker 3>was wrong about the Knicks. They had a gear I

0:30:14.000 --> 0:30:16.960
<v Speaker 3>did not think they had, and Jalen Brunson's been excellent.

0:30:17.040 --> 0:30:18.480
<v Speaker 3>So I give them credit. Go ahead.

0:30:18.840 --> 0:30:20.680
<v Speaker 4>So do you think we're on the verge of a

0:30:20.920 --> 0:30:23.600
<v Speaker 4>New York sports renaissance.

0:30:23.040 --> 0:30:25.760
<v Speaker 3>With Rogers coming here in the Knicks? I mean, right now,

0:30:25.760 --> 0:30:30.600
<v Speaker 3>it's an exciting time for my friends Pep and Josh

0:30:30.640 --> 0:30:33.760
<v Speaker 3>and these guys that are Knicks and Jets fans. It's

0:30:33.760 --> 0:30:36.440
<v Speaker 3>gotta be one of the best weeks of their adult lives.

0:30:36.480 --> 0:30:38.959
<v Speaker 3>As a Knicks fan, I mean it just has to be,

0:30:39.320 --> 0:30:42.080
<v Speaker 3>so I listen. I give them credit. The Knicks did

0:30:42.120 --> 0:30:45.160
<v Speaker 3>something not many people thought they were gonna do. Even

0:30:45.240 --> 0:30:46.840
<v Speaker 3>if you thought they were gonna beat the Calves, you

0:30:46.840 --> 0:30:49.120
<v Speaker 3>didn't think it was gonna be in five and now

0:30:49.200 --> 0:30:53.040
<v Speaker 3>because of the Bucks meltdown, you're the favorites against the Heat.

0:30:53.600 --> 0:30:56.280
<v Speaker 3>Credit to the Knicks. Also, I've got the heat. In

0:30:56.320 --> 0:30:58.840
<v Speaker 3>this series, We're gonna try to take a quick break

0:30:59.240 --> 0:31:01.880
<v Speaker 3>come back. If you're watching us on YouTube, we may

0:31:01.960 --> 0:31:04.000
<v Speaker 3>or may not actually be able to take the break.

0:31:04.040 --> 0:31:08.360
<v Speaker 3>We'll find out together, take quick break. What's Right?

0:31:14.960 --> 0:31:17.880
<v Speaker 6>Head to Whole Foods Market to jumpstart your January during

0:31:17.920 --> 0:31:21.000
<v Speaker 6>our New Year boosting event with savings on field good favorites,

0:31:21.080 --> 0:31:24.880
<v Speaker 6>store wide save on organic picks, wellness, staples, and more

0:31:25.080 --> 0:31:25.880
<v Speaker 6>all month long.

0:31:28.960 --> 0:31:32.720
<v Speaker 3>Welcome back, everybody, Okay, welcome back. In What's Right with

0:31:32.840 --> 0:31:36.280
<v Speaker 3>Nick Wright Episode one six, I'm dealing with slight or

0:31:36.400 --> 0:31:40.800
<v Speaker 3>our YouTube stream's got some technical difficulties. My computer's currently

0:31:40.880 --> 0:31:44.760
<v Speaker 3>having technical difficulties. Such is life after an insane day

0:31:45.200 --> 0:31:49.040
<v Speaker 3>in the NBA playoffs. All right, deor what's our last

0:31:49.040 --> 0:31:51.840
<v Speaker 3>topic before we get to our game of the day.

0:31:52.040 --> 0:31:55.480
<v Speaker 4>Okay, So you shocked even yourself on TV yesterday by

0:31:55.520 --> 0:32:02.080
<v Speaker 4>picking Denver over Phoenix. You're concerned about the Sun's and workload,

0:32:02.920 --> 0:32:06.480
<v Speaker 4>but this is a huge zag. Are you scared that

0:32:06.520 --> 0:32:10.080
<v Speaker 4>the Jokich brothers would come after you if you didn't

0:32:10.120 --> 0:32:12.200
<v Speaker 4>pick Denver? Or is this a sincere take?

0:32:12.360 --> 0:32:15.440
<v Speaker 3>No, of course it's a sincere take. I So the

0:32:15.480 --> 0:32:19.040
<v Speaker 3>reason I like Denver in this series is I was

0:32:19.440 --> 0:32:21.720
<v Speaker 3>and it is a zag. I thought I would like

0:32:21.920 --> 0:32:27.080
<v Speaker 3>the Suns in this series, but I I did not

0:32:27.480 --> 0:32:31.680
<v Speaker 3>like anything from that I saw from the Suns in

0:32:32.840 --> 0:32:35.360
<v Speaker 3>round one, Nick, they won in five. They won in

0:32:35.440 --> 0:32:38.800
<v Speaker 3>five against a team it's one one after two games

0:32:39.200 --> 0:32:41.360
<v Speaker 3>against the Clippers, who don't have their second best player,

0:32:41.600 --> 0:32:43.360
<v Speaker 3>and then their best player goes down for the rest

0:32:43.400 --> 0:32:45.480
<v Speaker 3>of the series. So now they're playing a team who's

0:32:45.480 --> 0:32:48.280
<v Speaker 3>best players Russell Westbrook and the second best players Norman Powell,

0:32:48.840 --> 0:32:52.080
<v Speaker 3>and those are close fourth quarters. You then add to

0:32:52.160 --> 0:32:57.440
<v Speaker 3>it that the highest scoring duo of any championship team,

0:32:57.480 --> 0:32:59.720
<v Speaker 3>with Shaq and Kobe and one, they average fifty nine

0:32:59.720 --> 0:33:04.000
<v Speaker 3>a game that right now, Katie and Durant, I'm sorry,

0:33:04.080 --> 0:33:07.840
<v Speaker 3>Katie and Durant. Booker and Durant are averaging sixty six

0:33:07.920 --> 0:33:13.120
<v Speaker 3>points a game. That's not sustainable. The most minutes played

0:33:13.120 --> 0:33:17.320
<v Speaker 3>in the postseason thus far is Durant, the second most

0:33:17.360 --> 0:33:21.280
<v Speaker 3>minutes is Booker. The ninth most minutes per game is

0:33:21.360 --> 0:33:27.440
<v Speaker 3>Chris Paul. That's not sustainable. Denver is going to has

0:33:27.560 --> 0:33:32.040
<v Speaker 3>home court. That series obviously is at altitude in Denver.

0:33:32.720 --> 0:33:37.800
<v Speaker 3>All of that massively concerns me, and because of that,

0:33:38.600 --> 0:33:43.360
<v Speaker 3>I think Denver is gonna win the series. You can't

0:33:43.440 --> 0:33:49.000
<v Speaker 3>win four rounds with a five man team, that's what

0:33:49.160 --> 0:33:51.800
<v Speaker 3>Phoenix is trying to do. And the fact that they

0:33:52.000 --> 0:33:56.800
<v Speaker 3>needed to play Booker and Durant ninety seven minutes a

0:33:56.880 --> 0:34:03.320
<v Speaker 3>game combined to get passed a injury ravaged Clippers team,

0:34:03.680 --> 0:34:07.960
<v Speaker 3>to me, is incredibly concerning. So yeah, listen, I'm not

0:34:08.000 --> 0:34:10.080
<v Speaker 3>a big Jokic guy. Everybody knows that. But it's not

0:34:10.120 --> 0:34:11.839
<v Speaker 3>like I think he's a bad player. I just didn't

0:34:11.840 --> 0:34:13.920
<v Speaker 3>think he should have been MVP the last few years.

0:34:14.560 --> 0:34:16.920
<v Speaker 3>I think the Nuggets are gonna win this series, and

0:34:16.960 --> 0:34:20.760
<v Speaker 3>I also don't like that lat in games the dolphense

0:34:20.840 --> 0:34:23.680
<v Speaker 3>isn't running through Durant, It's running through Devin Booker. That

0:34:23.800 --> 0:34:26.680
<v Speaker 3>concerns me as well. Does a lot of warning signs

0:34:26.719 --> 0:34:30.320
<v Speaker 3>to me for the Phoenix Suns in this series? All right? Next?

0:34:31.239 --> 0:34:34.920
<v Speaker 4>Okay, So tonight is the NFL Draft, just in time

0:34:34.960 --> 0:34:36.680
<v Speaker 4>for the return of the schools.

0:34:36.719 --> 0:34:38.440
<v Speaker 3>There are hold on, hold on before we do that,

0:34:38.560 --> 0:34:42.920
<v Speaker 3>just real quick NFL Draft. So there's seven rounds of it.

0:34:43.360 --> 0:34:47.959
<v Speaker 3>Tonight is just the first round, thirty two teams. There's

0:34:48.000 --> 0:34:51.760
<v Speaker 3>actually this year only thirty one picks because the team

0:34:52.120 --> 0:34:54.480
<v Speaker 3>the Dolphins, lost their pick for tampering with Tom Brady.

0:34:54.920 --> 0:34:57.239
<v Speaker 3>But it's you know, the commissioner walks up, says the

0:34:57.320 --> 0:35:00.799
<v Speaker 3>name of the player that they're drafting. How long do

0:35:00.920 --> 0:35:02.839
<v Speaker 3>you think the first round of the draft? Because it's

0:35:02.840 --> 0:35:05.359
<v Speaker 3>on TV, millions of people will watch, you can watch

0:35:05.360 --> 0:35:07.360
<v Speaker 3>sitting with me. How long do you think it takes

0:35:07.360 --> 0:35:09.920
<v Speaker 3>for the thirty two teams to pick their players for

0:35:10.000 --> 0:35:12.200
<v Speaker 3>the first round? Not all seven rounds, this first round? Like,

0:35:12.239 --> 0:35:13.680
<v Speaker 3>how long do you think the broadcast will be the

0:35:13.800 --> 0:35:17.239
<v Speaker 3>night Give it a guess, three hours, five and a

0:35:17.239 --> 0:35:20.480
<v Speaker 3>half hours. It's gonna be so great that with Hawk

0:35:20.600 --> 0:35:25.880
<v Speaker 3>Celtics on secondary screen. Very exciting, great television night. Also

0:35:26.360 --> 0:35:29.400
<v Speaker 3>is a rough week for marriages. Man, we had an

0:35:29.520 --> 0:35:33.720
<v Speaker 3>NBA triple header Tuesday, a quad header last night, NFL

0:35:33.880 --> 0:35:37.120
<v Speaker 3>Draft tonight plus Hawk Celtics tomorrow night.

0:35:37.560 --> 0:35:38.080
<v Speaker 6>You have.

0:35:39.680 --> 0:35:43.279
<v Speaker 3>NBA? What do we have? A doubleheader plus rounds two

0:35:43.280 --> 0:35:46.160
<v Speaker 3>and three in the draft? Little nervous, but okay, go ahead.

0:35:46.160 --> 0:35:47.080
<v Speaker 3>What game are we playing?

0:35:47.400 --> 0:35:51.760
<v Speaker 4>We're about to play a game of Nick Stradamus. Yep, okay,

0:35:52.360 --> 0:35:56.880
<v Speaker 4>So four qbs have been prophesied, Young Stroud, Richardson and

0:35:57.360 --> 0:35:58.120
<v Speaker 4>look at the screen.

0:35:58.480 --> 0:36:01.520
<v Speaker 3>I love that. That is a great photoshop for those

0:36:01.520 --> 0:36:03.680
<v Speaker 3>of us, for those people that have stuck with the

0:36:04.200 --> 0:36:07.400
<v Speaker 3>the technical difficulties on YouTube. They're getting a great photoshop

0:36:07.480 --> 0:36:12.200
<v Speaker 3>treat there. But go ahead, Young Stroud, Richardson and Levis Yep.

0:36:12.280 --> 0:36:16.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. However, the exact order of said prophecy was lost.

0:36:16.600 --> 0:36:20.160
<v Speaker 4>You were able to decipher the prophecy of the prince

0:36:20.280 --> 0:36:23.839
<v Speaker 4>that was promised. Yea, work your magic again, Nick stredamits

0:36:23.840 --> 0:36:28.120
<v Speaker 4>souso sport. What say you about this year's QB prophecy?

0:36:28.760 --> 0:36:31.839
<v Speaker 3>Well, listen, Bryce Young is gonna go number one to Carolina.

0:36:32.160 --> 0:36:35.759
<v Speaker 3>It then gets real tricky. It wouldn't be shocking if

0:36:35.800 --> 0:36:40.640
<v Speaker 3>the Texans at two don't take a quarterback demon in

0:36:40.640 --> 0:36:42.880
<v Speaker 3>the corn and the Tarot card. If the Texans end

0:36:42.960 --> 0:36:46.040
<v Speaker 3>up taking Will Anderson at too, and then a team

0:36:47.280 --> 0:36:51.279
<v Speaker 3>trades up with Arizona so they can get their quarterback

0:36:51.320 --> 0:36:54.319
<v Speaker 3>at three, I don't know if that's the there we go.

0:36:54.719 --> 0:36:58.239
<v Speaker 3>Uh here's what I will say about the quarterback for

0:36:58.560 --> 0:37:05.000
<v Speaker 3>my quarterback predictions. I don't love this class. The guy

0:37:05.120 --> 0:37:09.239
<v Speaker 3>who I think has the best chance to be a

0:37:09.480 --> 0:37:15.360
<v Speaker 3>star is Anthony Richardson because of all the crazy athletic tools.

0:37:15.719 --> 0:37:18.839
<v Speaker 3>He's not gonna go number one. Bryce Young will go

0:37:18.960 --> 0:37:22.279
<v Speaker 3>number one to the to the Panthers. I might have

0:37:22.320 --> 0:37:24.840
<v Speaker 3>said the team wrong earlier. He's going number one to

0:37:24.880 --> 0:37:29.279
<v Speaker 3>the Panthers. But Bryce Young, my concern with him is

0:37:29.320 --> 0:37:32.640
<v Speaker 3>the same concern that I always tell you I have

0:37:32.800 --> 0:37:37.240
<v Speaker 3>with these quarterbacks. He's too little. There's my concern with Kyler.

0:37:37.680 --> 0:37:40.839
<v Speaker 3>You can't be one hundred and seventy pounds and play

0:37:40.920 --> 0:37:42.960
<v Speaker 3>quarter or one hundred and eighty pounds and play quarterback

0:37:43.000 --> 0:37:47.120
<v Speaker 3>in the NFL. You just can't. And so I think

0:37:47.120 --> 0:37:49.280
<v Speaker 3>he's a great young man. I think he's super sharp.

0:37:49.320 --> 0:37:52.080
<v Speaker 3>His college state is great. I worry about his ability

0:37:52.120 --> 0:37:54.600
<v Speaker 3>to stay healthy. But he's gonna go number one. The

0:37:54.680 --> 0:37:57.880
<v Speaker 3>quarterback I would take if my team needed a quarterback,

0:37:58.000 --> 0:38:00.000
<v Speaker 3>and I thought I had to compete with Patrick Mahomes

0:38:00.280 --> 0:38:04.120
<v Speaker 3>and Trevor Lawrence and those guys would be Anthony Richardson,

0:38:04.200 --> 0:38:06.160
<v Speaker 3>even though it's a project next.

0:38:06.360 --> 0:38:09.840
<v Speaker 4>Okay, there's been a lot of bad juju surrounding C. J.

0:38:10.000 --> 0:38:16.160
<v Speaker 4>Stroud after reports of a bag cognitive cognition cognition test

0:38:16.200 --> 0:38:20.880
<v Speaker 4>score and him spurning the Manning camp. But is this

0:38:21.000 --> 0:38:23.799
<v Speaker 4>all just mumbo jumbo. Use your third eye to see

0:38:23.800 --> 0:38:27.240
<v Speaker 4>if there is actually anything wrong with Stroud.

0:38:27.320 --> 0:38:28.920
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if there's anything wrong with Stroud, but

0:38:28.960 --> 0:38:30.600
<v Speaker 3>I do think he's going to be penalized for this

0:38:30.640 --> 0:38:33.960
<v Speaker 3>by teams. Okay, I think that there was when the

0:38:33.960 --> 0:38:37.360
<v Speaker 3>Panthers initially traded up for number one, there was real

0:38:37.440 --> 0:38:40.680
<v Speaker 3>smoke that he was going to go number one. Now

0:38:40.719 --> 0:38:44.279
<v Speaker 3>there seems to be real smoke that he potentially could

0:38:44.280 --> 0:38:48.000
<v Speaker 3>be the fourth quarterback taken. I don't know that I

0:38:48.120 --> 0:38:52.680
<v Speaker 3>buy that if the Texans pass on a quarterback at two,

0:38:53.680 --> 0:38:57.839
<v Speaker 3>I find it impossible to believe that if he's there

0:38:57.880 --> 0:39:01.120
<v Speaker 3>at twelve, where they also have the that they're not

0:39:01.239 --> 0:39:06.000
<v Speaker 3>taking him at twelve. But I do think, and I

0:39:06.040 --> 0:39:09.239
<v Speaker 3>don't know that I buy the validity of it, but

0:39:09.440 --> 0:39:15.240
<v Speaker 3>that the S two cognition test and his grade being

0:39:15.480 --> 0:39:17.920
<v Speaker 3>so bad on it is gonna hurt him. I know

0:39:18.040 --> 0:39:20.080
<v Speaker 3>that he came out and said, I'm not a test taker,

0:39:20.080 --> 0:39:22.359
<v Speaker 3>I'm a football player. I get that, and I respect that,

0:39:23.000 --> 0:39:26.320
<v Speaker 3>and people that study this stuff more than me really

0:39:26.400 --> 0:39:29.160
<v Speaker 3>like his processing in his film. But I do think

0:39:29.200 --> 0:39:31.200
<v Speaker 3>he's gonna fall in the draft. I think a guy

0:39:31.200 --> 0:39:33.960
<v Speaker 3>who some people thought was gonna go number one. Now

0:39:34.200 --> 0:39:38.920
<v Speaker 3>to me, it seems unlikely he's even the second quarterback taken,

0:39:39.040 --> 0:39:41.960
<v Speaker 3>and on the board that he's the fourth quarterback taken.

0:39:42.000 --> 0:39:46.160
<v Speaker 4>All right, next, Okay, The center of the NFL Cosmos

0:39:46.239 --> 0:39:49.279
<v Speaker 4>for the NFL Draft is located not in Neptune, nor

0:39:49.280 --> 0:39:52.359
<v Speaker 4>at the edge of Kyrie's flat Earth, but in Kansas City. Yeah,

0:39:52.480 --> 0:39:54.719
<v Speaker 4>gates into the future. Will Kansas City thrive or with

0:39:54.840 --> 0:39:56.680
<v Speaker 4>the universe collapse in on itself.

0:40:00.440 --> 0:40:05.000
<v Speaker 3>Here's the thing. I love my hometown. I'm so excited

0:40:05.040 --> 0:40:08.600
<v Speaker 3>we get to host the Draft. I don't think it

0:40:08.680 --> 0:40:14.760
<v Speaker 3>is the you know, the ideal location for a mega event.

0:40:15.080 --> 0:40:18.560
<v Speaker 3>It's not really what Kansas City is built for. However,

0:40:19.360 --> 0:40:23.279
<v Speaker 3>what you are going to get? Nothing's the only thing

0:40:23.400 --> 0:40:29.040
<v Speaker 3>sports reporters like more than Bruce Springsteen concerts is talking

0:40:29.080 --> 0:40:34.640
<v Speaker 3>about great local food. And Kansas City has awesome food,

0:40:35.200 --> 0:40:38.400
<v Speaker 3>and they're gonna have you're gonna you cannot go wrong

0:40:38.800 --> 0:40:43.759
<v Speaker 3>with the local barbecue spots. Now, our downtown leaves a

0:40:43.760 --> 0:40:47.440
<v Speaker 3>little something to be desired, but there is great Mexican

0:40:47.480 --> 0:40:50.960
<v Speaker 3>food in Kansas City. There is the best barbecue in

0:40:51.040 --> 0:40:52.399
<v Speaker 3>the world in Kansas City.

0:40:52.640 --> 0:40:54.919
<v Speaker 4>Sure, some people would disagree with you on that one.

0:40:55.000 --> 0:40:57.400
<v Speaker 4>On what the best barbecue in the world.

0:40:57.560 --> 0:41:01.120
<v Speaker 3>Okay, well they're wrong. I mean it's it's it's accepted

0:41:01.160 --> 0:41:03.200
<v Speaker 3>by anyone of the brain that can. Kan City is

0:41:03.239 --> 0:41:04.399
<v Speaker 3>known for barbie better.

0:41:05.280 --> 0:41:07.160
<v Speaker 4>Texas is known for their barbecue.

0:41:07.280 --> 0:41:10.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and it's in Texas barbecue and its dry rubs

0:41:10.600 --> 0:41:13.560
<v Speaker 3>and their obsession with brisket. It's just not even close.

0:41:13.760 --> 0:41:17.279
<v Speaker 3>I've lived in both places. It's not either. It's in

0:41:17.360 --> 0:41:24.240
<v Speaker 3>Saint Louis barbecue stinks, Memphis barbecue very good, the Carolina's barbecue.

0:41:24.320 --> 0:41:26.400
<v Speaker 3>It's your loyalty.

0:41:26.640 --> 0:41:29.000
<v Speaker 4>I'm going to read these comments afterwards and see what

0:41:29.040 --> 0:41:31.359
<v Speaker 4>they say, because I bet you everyone will agree with.

0:41:31.400 --> 0:41:34.719
<v Speaker 3>Okay, well, I don't give it. They're wrong. And when

0:41:34.760 --> 0:41:35.719
<v Speaker 3>I'm telling you know.

0:41:35.840 --> 0:41:38.120
<v Speaker 4>One of those things that you can't where is.

0:41:37.960 --> 0:41:43.480
<v Speaker 3>The best barbecue? Do you think it's not? Uh, a

0:41:43.680 --> 0:41:46.800
<v Speaker 3>very widely held belief that Kancity is the best barbecue

0:41:46.800 --> 0:41:47.240
<v Speaker 3>in the world.

0:41:47.400 --> 0:41:50.200
<v Speaker 4>I'm sure some people think that, but I'm pretty sure

0:41:50.280 --> 0:41:53.840
<v Speaker 4>every like it's kind of a general consensus that Texas

0:41:53.880 --> 0:41:54.880
<v Speaker 4>has the best barbecue.

0:41:55.040 --> 0:41:59.560
<v Speaker 3>And I'm telling you that that is nonsense. We let Texas.

0:41:59.600 --> 0:42:02.799
<v Speaker 3>Here's the thing, here's the hot take people aren't ready for.

0:42:03.719 --> 0:42:06.960
<v Speaker 3>It's not that Kansas City barbecue is better than Texas barbecue.

0:42:07.520 --> 0:42:12.680
<v Speaker 3>It's that Texas barbecue is below average. It's that if

0:42:12.719 --> 0:42:17.680
<v Speaker 3>we are ranking barbecue, it's Kansas City one, Memphis two,

0:42:18.200 --> 0:42:23.000
<v Speaker 3>the Carolinas three. That's the list. And so don't go

0:42:23.360 --> 0:42:24.600
<v Speaker 3>I'm not I'm using.

0:42:24.480 --> 0:42:28.360
<v Speaker 4>So yeah, number one is Texas according to what doora.

0:42:28.640 --> 0:42:33.280
<v Speaker 4>Second is Memphis according to what DOORA heard is Kansas City, Missouri.

0:42:33.040 --> 0:42:36.480
<v Speaker 3>According to what doorra Google. No, well that's just the

0:42:36.600 --> 0:42:40.680
<v Speaker 3>first as search engine optimization, because I can tell you

0:42:40.760 --> 0:42:43.879
<v Speaker 3>right now, the New York Post said the number one

0:42:44.000 --> 0:42:48.200
<v Speaker 3>barbecue restaurant in America is Joe's Kansas City, and Joe's

0:42:48.239 --> 0:42:50.880
<v Speaker 3>Kansas City, while great and I had it when I

0:42:50.960 --> 0:42:52.919
<v Speaker 3>was there a couple of weeks ago, is not even

0:42:52.920 --> 0:42:55.759
<v Speaker 3>the best barbecue place in Kansas City, and they're gone

0:42:55.800 --> 0:42:57.800
<v Speaker 3>to the best barbecue place in the world.

0:42:57.920 --> 0:43:01.200
<v Speaker 4>Literally, every single place I'm looking at has Missouria's third,

0:43:01.239 --> 0:43:02.560
<v Speaker 4>no matter who's first and second.

0:43:02.719 --> 0:43:06.839
<v Speaker 3>Okay, And I'm telling you right now that because some

0:43:07.120 --> 0:43:12.240
<v Speaker 3>dopes at some marketing firm in Houston optimized their their

0:43:12.440 --> 0:43:14.839
<v Speaker 3>search engines queries to.

0:43:15.080 --> 0:43:17.040
<v Speaker 4>You could just admit that you're wrong.

0:43:17.400 --> 0:43:19.040
<v Speaker 3>Wrong, I'm not wrong.

0:43:20.120 --> 0:43:24.120
<v Speaker 4>Every single place as Kansas City as third and first

0:43:24.239 --> 0:43:26.160
<v Speaker 4>is either Memphis or Texas.

0:43:26.160 --> 0:43:30.040
<v Speaker 3>Okay, that's great. I'm very happy that people love Franklin's

0:43:30.120 --> 0:43:32.480
<v Speaker 3>in Austin. Give me a break.

0:43:32.920 --> 0:43:37.400
<v Speaker 4>That the that's why you do say anything when you googled,

0:43:37.440 --> 0:43:40.799
<v Speaker 4>because you saw that everywhere said Texans. That's why I.

0:43:41.280 --> 0:43:45.960
<v Speaker 3>Don't again these places. And I have to you, you

0:43:46.000 --> 0:43:47.040
<v Speaker 3>don't claim Kansas City.

0:43:47.040 --> 0:43:49.000
<v Speaker 4>You have I said, I don't claim it as my hometown.

0:43:49.040 --> 0:43:50.279
<v Speaker 4>That doesn't mean I didn't live there.

0:43:50.320 --> 0:43:56.319
<v Speaker 3>You listen, now tell you this much. Oh oh, by

0:43:56.360 --> 0:44:00.000
<v Speaker 3>the way, what's the barbecue capital of America? Kansas City

0:44:00.120 --> 0:44:05.640
<v Speaker 3>is the barbecue capital of the world. According to Yeah

0:44:06.719 --> 0:44:10.759
<v Speaker 3>He's have the best barbecue. The Lockhart, Texas is number one.

0:44:11.160 --> 0:44:14.759
<v Speaker 3>Give me a break, Lockhart, Texas. What is the best

0:44:14.760 --> 0:44:21.400
<v Speaker 3>barbecue in the world. This place vent O'haragano and South Paulo, Brazil.

0:44:21.440 --> 0:44:23.080
<v Speaker 3>I'm sure it's quite good, but give me a break.

0:44:23.160 --> 0:44:29.600
<v Speaker 4>The top three barbecue cities in the US San Antonio, Austin, Dallas, Kansas.

0:44:29.400 --> 0:44:33.640
<v Speaker 3>Obviously a Texas plason. They are different styles of barbecue.

0:44:34.160 --> 0:44:37.200
<v Speaker 3>We're ending this debate here. They are different styles of barbecue.

0:44:37.440 --> 0:44:39.600
<v Speaker 3>Texas is all about dry rubs.

0:44:39.840 --> 0:44:41.920
<v Speaker 4>No, it's not. It's big on ribs.

0:44:42.000 --> 0:44:46.360
<v Speaker 3>It's a big on Hold on a second here, dry

0:44:46.440 --> 0:44:49.239
<v Speaker 3>rub is not it will admit it. Dry rub is

0:44:49.280 --> 0:44:56.720
<v Speaker 3>not a meat. It's the meat. And Kansas Kansas Carolina's

0:44:56.840 --> 0:45:00.000
<v Speaker 3>is like a vinegar based sauce. Kansas City is about

0:45:00.400 --> 0:45:03.279
<v Speaker 3>a lot of It is about the sauce that goes

0:45:03.320 --> 0:45:06.479
<v Speaker 3>with the barbecue. Hence Casey Master's barbecue sauce and text

0:45:06.520 --> 0:45:08.960
<v Speaker 3>is all about dry rubs. It's just not as good.

0:45:09.360 --> 0:45:12.520
<v Speaker 3>It's just flatly not as good. Now back to the

0:45:12.600 --> 0:45:15.960
<v Speaker 3>point of the question. This is why I'm not certain

0:45:16.400 --> 0:45:21.280
<v Speaker 3>Kansas City is the ideal major events you know city

0:45:21.320 --> 0:45:24.040
<v Speaker 3>in America because the best thing we have going for

0:45:24.160 --> 0:45:27.520
<v Speaker 3>us is the barbecue. Luckily, the barbecuees are the best

0:45:27.560 --> 0:45:30.320
<v Speaker 3>in the world. I'm not listening to any more arguments

0:45:30.360 --> 0:45:33.359
<v Speaker 3>on this. We are moving on. What is next? What

0:45:33.440 --> 0:45:35.680
<v Speaker 3>is next? Do you think you won that argument?

0:45:35.800 --> 0:45:38.400
<v Speaker 4>I do think I won that argument. Actually, Okay, the

0:45:38.480 --> 0:45:41.719
<v Speaker 4>night sky is full of stars, but some may be

0:45:41.880 --> 0:45:46.480
<v Speaker 4>in motion. Astronomers predict the DeAndre Hopkins and Derrick Henry

0:45:46.640 --> 0:45:50.719
<v Speaker 4>consolations may be shifting. Interpret the stars. Which will we

0:45:50.760 --> 0:45:51.760
<v Speaker 4>move during this draft?

0:45:53.360 --> 0:45:57.480
<v Speaker 3>I think DeAndre Hopkins gets traded. I think you might

0:45:57.520 --> 0:46:01.040
<v Speaker 3>get traded to the Chiefs, which would be great for

0:46:01.120 --> 0:46:03.600
<v Speaker 3>him because you get to move to the best barbecue

0:46:03.680 --> 0:46:07.080
<v Speaker 3>capital of the world. After living in Houston and having

0:46:07.080 --> 0:46:08.960
<v Speaker 3>to deal with that medium.

0:46:10.280 --> 0:46:14.360
<v Speaker 4>Barbecue, I missed the Texas barbecue best in the world.

0:46:17.400 --> 0:46:20.840
<v Speaker 3>If you're not watching on YouTube, if you are watching

0:46:20.880 --> 0:46:22.759
<v Speaker 3>on YouTube, you can tell if you're not. I'm going

0:46:22.840 --> 0:46:26.880
<v Speaker 3>to reveal something right now. I'm really annoyed. I'm like

0:46:27.160 --> 0:46:31.759
<v Speaker 3>highly irritated. Your brother would never do this. Where is

0:46:31.800 --> 0:46:34.160
<v Speaker 3>he when we need him? Where's my act?

0:46:34.200 --> 0:46:37.719
<v Speaker 4>Do you think Demanze wouldn't stand with Texas instead of

0:46:37.800 --> 0:46:41.719
<v Speaker 4>Kansas City. I think demand you know he would be

0:46:41.760 --> 0:46:42.719
<v Speaker 4>on my side here.

0:46:43.040 --> 0:46:45.640
<v Speaker 3>Oh, I think deep down he might agree with you.

0:46:46.000 --> 0:46:49.120
<v Speaker 3>But I think Demanse, much like despite doing the show,

0:46:50.480 --> 0:46:54.240
<v Speaker 3>never had the audacity to try to do the intros

0:46:54.280 --> 0:46:57.960
<v Speaker 3>and the outros himself. He would understand that when I

0:46:58.000 --> 0:47:01.359
<v Speaker 3>am this firm and adamant about something, it is his

0:47:01.560 --> 0:47:05.719
<v Speaker 3>role as the co host to lay down his sword. You,

0:47:05.840 --> 0:47:08.080
<v Speaker 3>on the other hand, just yep, yep, yep, yep.

0:47:08.120 --> 0:47:10.279
<v Speaker 4>You realize when you have a co host, that means

0:47:10.280 --> 0:47:11.440
<v Speaker 4>that you're both co hosts.

0:47:12.480 --> 0:47:15.480
<v Speaker 3>I disagree with that. I've heard that before. I disagree

0:47:15.480 --> 0:47:16.120
<v Speaker 3>with You're like.

0:47:16.120 --> 0:47:18.680
<v Speaker 4>Saying, I'm the co host and we're co hosts.

0:47:18.920 --> 0:47:20.240
<v Speaker 3>No, I'm the host.

0:47:20.480 --> 0:47:24.400
<v Speaker 4>If there's a host there's only one person, it's co hosts.

0:47:24.480 --> 0:47:27.719
<v Speaker 4>If there's two people, which means we are both co hosts.

0:47:28.040 --> 0:47:32.279
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I disagree. I I understand what you're saying. Many

0:47:32.320 --> 0:47:34.600
<v Speaker 3>people agree with and I'm sure if you googled that

0:47:35.360 --> 0:47:37.799
<v Speaker 3>it would come up in your favor as well. I

0:47:37.960 --> 0:47:42.040
<v Speaker 3>flatly disagree. I'm the host of like the by the way,

0:47:42.080 --> 0:47:42.440
<v Speaker 3>this is.

0:47:42.400 --> 0:47:45.200
<v Speaker 4>Good, the dictator and our subject Colin.

0:47:45.680 --> 0:47:48.760
<v Speaker 3>Colin does this too. When he introduces me on the Herd,

0:47:49.160 --> 0:47:51.839
<v Speaker 3>he says, the co host of First Things First, and

0:47:51.880 --> 0:47:54.440
<v Speaker 3>I always, deep down I'm like, eh, the host of

0:47:54.480 --> 0:47:56.280
<v Speaker 3>First Things First? Next?

0:47:56.680 --> 0:47:57.359
<v Speaker 4>Whatever?

0:47:57.920 --> 0:47:58.280
<v Speaker 3>Next?

0:47:58.440 --> 0:48:02.359
<v Speaker 4>Okay, Jean, sorry, Jean?

0:48:02.680 --> 0:48:05.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. God.

0:48:06.000 --> 0:48:09.640
<v Speaker 4>In the time of old sages, first round running backs

0:48:09.640 --> 0:48:13.160
<v Speaker 4>are plentiful, but a chosen one has risen from the

0:48:13.200 --> 0:48:17.200
<v Speaker 4>ashes again this year. Read the tea leaves which team

0:48:17.200 --> 0:48:19.040
<v Speaker 4>will select Bajon Robinson.

0:48:23.800 --> 0:48:27.839
<v Speaker 3>This is a tough one because it just would just

0:48:28.080 --> 0:48:31.839
<v Speaker 3>be the wrong decision to spend the top ten pick

0:48:31.880 --> 0:48:36.960
<v Speaker 3>on it. Not because a running back can't be great

0:48:37.120 --> 0:48:42.320
<v Speaker 3>enough for you know, four years to make that worthy

0:48:42.360 --> 0:48:46.920
<v Speaker 3>of a top ten pick, but because none of the

0:48:47.000 --> 0:48:51.319
<v Speaker 3>teams drafting in the top ten are that are a

0:48:51.440 --> 0:48:56.000
<v Speaker 3>piece away from winning. If you had a team that

0:48:56.080 --> 0:48:59.399
<v Speaker 3>will let me give no team drafting in the top

0:48:59.520 --> 0:49:03.000
<v Speaker 3>nine is he's away from winning? I should say a

0:49:03.040 --> 0:49:09.719
<v Speaker 3>team like Philly that was in the Super Bowl and

0:49:09.880 --> 0:49:12.280
<v Speaker 3>only as a top ten pick because of that foolish

0:49:12.560 --> 0:49:17.120
<v Speaker 3>trade the Saints made. If he's there at ten, I

0:49:17.280 --> 0:49:19.279
<v Speaker 3>don't think that would be a bad pick for them.

0:49:19.840 --> 0:49:25.960
<v Speaker 3>There's window is right now. He's awesome now it's running backs,

0:49:26.239 --> 0:49:29.440
<v Speaker 3>so it's not a long career. I understand all of that,

0:49:30.600 --> 0:49:32.719
<v Speaker 3>but it was I know there's some rumors like, hey,

0:49:32.760 --> 0:49:35.359
<v Speaker 3>could Atlanta take him? They're so far away that would

0:49:35.440 --> 0:49:39.560
<v Speaker 3>make no sense. But Philly is not so Philly at

0:49:39.760 --> 0:49:44.480
<v Speaker 3>ten to me couldn't make sense if he gets past

0:49:44.640 --> 0:49:52.160
<v Speaker 3>Philly at ten. I think that the Jags at twenty four,

0:49:53.120 --> 0:49:54.840
<v Speaker 3>but they just spent a second und pick on Travis

0:49:54.840 --> 0:49:59.000
<v Speaker 3>at tea and that's probably unrealistic. The Bills at twenty seven,

0:50:00.200 --> 0:50:03.200
<v Speaker 3>if he were to fall that far, that would make

0:50:03.239 --> 0:50:06.520
<v Speaker 3>sense for them. I hope that the Bills or the

0:50:06.560 --> 0:50:09.839
<v Speaker 3>Bengals don't take him because I do think for three

0:50:09.960 --> 0:50:16.439
<v Speaker 3>or four years he could be elite and really help him. Next.

0:50:17.000 --> 0:50:17.520
<v Speaker 3>Are we done?

0:50:17.680 --> 0:50:18.239
<v Speaker 4>Ye're done?

0:50:18.360 --> 0:50:22.319
<v Speaker 3>We're done? Okay, sweet? Sorry, I'm still tilted. Oh.

0:50:22.360 --> 0:50:26.400
<v Speaker 4>Demanse apparently has weighed in on the barbecue debate via text.

0:50:26.600 --> 0:50:29.160
<v Speaker 3>What did he say? What does he say?

0:50:29.320 --> 0:50:29.880
<v Speaker 4>Oh?

0:50:29.920 --> 0:50:34.279
<v Speaker 3>Look at my guy? There's my guy. That's what I'm

0:50:34.320 --> 0:50:37.799
<v Speaker 3>to see. Where are you at? Son? Can we I

0:50:37.840 --> 0:50:40.799
<v Speaker 3>know we're building out a studio in LA that's not

0:50:40.840 --> 0:50:42.759
<v Speaker 3>so to be ready till August, but maybe we can

0:50:42.800 --> 0:50:45.600
<v Speaker 3>get that done. Earlier. What did he say, look at

0:50:45.600 --> 0:50:50.400
<v Speaker 3>the screen? Case, he's the best, That's what Demanse said.

0:50:50.880 --> 0:50:51.719
<v Speaker 3>How about that?

0:50:51.960 --> 0:50:54.200
<v Speaker 4>And he knew you needed someone on your side?

0:50:54.360 --> 0:51:03.040
<v Speaker 3>Well, no, he just he understood his his what uh

0:51:03.080 --> 0:51:06.560
<v Speaker 3>he just under you know, he gets it. He understands

0:51:07.040 --> 0:51:10.720
<v Speaker 3>all of our jobs within this family podcast.

0:51:10.680 --> 0:51:12.640
<v Speaker 4>Which is what exactly.

0:51:12.719 --> 0:51:15.680
<v Speaker 3>To make me look as good as possible. That's the

0:51:15.800 --> 0:51:19.320
<v Speaker 3>rolet hard Okay, quick break, right back, answer your questions

0:51:19.320 --> 0:51:27.520
<v Speaker 3>in the chat What's right? All right? Welcome back in

0:51:27.560 --> 0:51:30.319
<v Speaker 3>episode one, What's right with Nick? Right? We have a

0:51:30.360 --> 0:51:33.799
<v Speaker 3>surprise video from Demands. I'm told I don't know what

0:51:33.880 --> 0:51:36.120
<v Speaker 3>it is, but I'm excited to see it. Before we

0:51:36.200 --> 0:51:39.600
<v Speaker 3>do that, though, Deora, let's read some listener questions or comments.

0:51:39.640 --> 0:51:40.800
<v Speaker 3>You go right ahead, okay.

0:51:40.880 --> 0:51:44.560
<v Speaker 4>CVM said Texas and Memphis and North Carolina are all

0:51:44.600 --> 0:51:45.319
<v Speaker 4>better than casey.

0:51:45.480 --> 0:51:50.320
<v Speaker 3>Okay, go to Okay, go to Arthur Bryant's order, half

0:51:50.360 --> 0:51:54.240
<v Speaker 3>burn In's half work and what.

0:51:54.760 --> 0:51:55.520
<v Speaker 4>Are not good?

0:51:55.680 --> 0:51:59.319
<v Speaker 3>See? So oh, now we have the answer. That is

0:52:00.200 --> 0:52:05.239
<v Speaker 3>probably the staple of Kansty barbecue is burn ins. So

0:52:05.280 --> 0:52:08.000
<v Speaker 3>if you don't like burn ins, it is like being like, oh,

0:52:08.360 --> 0:52:12.400
<v Speaker 3>all French restaurants suck by the way I hate duck Lorange, Like,

0:52:12.480 --> 0:52:15.600
<v Speaker 3>give me a break. You just don't like the specialty

0:52:16.239 --> 0:52:21.600
<v Speaker 3>like the I mean you guys like the duck Lorange drop. Uh,

0:52:21.880 --> 0:52:26.200
<v Speaker 3>just you just you should have removed yourself from this argument.

0:52:27.040 --> 0:52:29.080
<v Speaker 4>Like the veins are popping out.

0:52:29.000 --> 0:52:32.839
<v Speaker 3>In your You're really frustrating me. Next question, all right,

0:52:32.880 --> 0:52:35.520
<v Speaker 3>what's Caleb's Celia asking do you are.

0:52:35.920 --> 0:52:38.520
<v Speaker 4>With the draft tonight? What picks or trades could occur

0:52:38.640 --> 0:52:42.520
<v Speaker 4>that would indicate what's in Lamar's future. Could the Colts

0:52:42.600 --> 0:52:45.600
<v Speaker 4>trade down or pick a non QB with the hopes

0:52:45.640 --> 0:52:47.120
<v Speaker 4>of signing Lamar after the draft?

0:52:47.200 --> 0:52:50.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think that'd be a that's a great question.

0:52:51.520 --> 0:52:54.560
<v Speaker 3>If the Colts don't. If the Colts don't take a quarterback,

0:52:55.520 --> 0:53:01.840
<v Speaker 3>that's gotta alert your Lamar antenna. Any team that trades

0:53:01.880 --> 0:53:06.839
<v Speaker 3>away a pick in this year's draft to get an

0:53:07.160 --> 0:53:10.279
<v Speaker 3>to get extra picks in next year's draft, if that

0:53:10.400 --> 0:53:13.800
<v Speaker 3>team needs a quarterback, that should raise your Lamari and Tenna.

0:53:14.280 --> 0:53:17.239
<v Speaker 3>Or any team that spends a premium pick this year

0:53:17.320 --> 0:53:20.719
<v Speaker 3>on a wide receiver, if they don't have their franchise

0:53:20.800 --> 0:53:23.920
<v Speaker 3>quarterback set, that should raise your Lamari and Tenna. That's

0:53:23.960 --> 0:53:26.440
<v Speaker 3>a great question. All right next.

0:53:26.800 --> 0:53:28.880
<v Speaker 4>Well, John taid to ask, what direction do you think

0:53:28.920 --> 0:53:30.000
<v Speaker 4>the Bucks will go from here?

0:53:31.080 --> 0:53:35.160
<v Speaker 3>Uh? I think they fire their coach. I think that

0:53:35.200 --> 0:53:39.040
<v Speaker 3>they fire their coach. I think that this series can

0:53:39.080 --> 0:53:42.319
<v Speaker 3>get the coach fire. I do all right, what King

0:53:42.320 --> 0:53:46.560
<v Speaker 3>of Fedoras, Okay, you got it.

0:53:47.080 --> 0:53:50.360
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. King of Fedoras asked if Jemmy Butler wins a

0:53:50.440 --> 0:53:53.279
<v Speaker 4>title in Miami, is there a legit case for him?

0:53:53.800 --> 0:53:57.479
<v Speaker 4>Oh gosh, be in the greatest Heat of all time?

0:53:57.760 --> 0:54:01.160
<v Speaker 3>No, no, no, no, no, no, that's Dwayne Wade. Lebron's the

0:54:01.200 --> 0:54:04.000
<v Speaker 3>best player who's ever played there. But the greatest player

0:54:04.000 --> 0:54:07.280
<v Speaker 3>in franchise history is Dwayne Wade, And there's no question

0:54:07.360 --> 0:54:10.279
<v Speaker 3>about it. He delivered them a title in six He

0:54:10.400 --> 0:54:12.239
<v Speaker 3>was the second best player on a team that went

0:54:12.280 --> 0:54:15.400
<v Speaker 3>to four straight finals and won two more titles. It's

0:54:15.440 --> 0:54:19.400
<v Speaker 3>it's without a doubt, it is uh d Wade. So no,

0:54:19.520 --> 0:54:23.200
<v Speaker 3>but he gets on the mount rushmore right now, the

0:54:23.239 --> 0:54:29.680
<v Speaker 3>greatest Heat ever are d Wade, Lebron, Shack Alonzo Morning.

0:54:31.560 --> 0:54:36.000
<v Speaker 3>I think he knocks Alonzo Mourning. No, maybe he knocked

0:54:36.080 --> 0:54:38.560
<v Speaker 3>Shack off that because he would have delivered. Yeah, I

0:54:38.560 --> 0:54:41.000
<v Speaker 3>think he would knock Shack off that list.

0:54:41.000 --> 0:54:45.440
<v Speaker 4>All right, next, Okay, so next.

0:54:45.040 --> 0:54:46.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Burston Studious.

0:54:46.320 --> 0:54:50.120
<v Speaker 4>Burston Studious asked, what do you think the trade market

0:54:50.239 --> 0:54:55.279
<v Speaker 4>for Kawhi and or Paul George is for Quiet and

0:54:55.480 --> 0:54:59.520
<v Speaker 4>or Paul George? They couldn't. They could definitely help a

0:54:59.560 --> 0:55:03.480
<v Speaker 4>lot of contenders, but are too unreliable to be number ones.

0:55:04.200 --> 0:55:06.080
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I think there's a far better trademarkt for

0:55:06.120 --> 0:55:08.319
<v Speaker 3>Paul George than Kawhi. I think why at this point

0:55:08.360 --> 0:55:11.400
<v Speaker 3>is almost untradeable. He's on a max contract and it

0:55:11.560 --> 0:55:14.839
<v Speaker 3>looks like he might have a degenerative needs, Like I

0:55:14.920 --> 0:55:17.440
<v Speaker 3>just don't think I don't think there's a market for him.

0:55:17.440 --> 0:55:19.359
<v Speaker 3>I also think they're just gonna run it back. All right,

0:55:19.440 --> 0:55:21.480
<v Speaker 3>last one before we get to Demonte's video.

0:55:22.200 --> 0:55:25.920
<v Speaker 4>Go ahead, Okay, Mike Swain said, Diora, you may hate

0:55:25.920 --> 0:55:29.680
<v Speaker 4>me for this, but the but he loves the rating

0:55:29.880 --> 0:55:32.200
<v Speaker 4>that you give me on the show and that I've

0:55:32.239 --> 0:55:36.279
<v Speaker 4>really come into my own Oh and that you that

0:55:36.360 --> 0:55:38.480
<v Speaker 4>he thinks that you're just really proud of me and

0:55:38.480 --> 0:55:39.359
<v Speaker 4>that he loves the show.

0:55:39.520 --> 0:55:43.439
<v Speaker 3>Well, thank you, Mike. Uh And I was really proud

0:55:43.440 --> 0:55:45.799
<v Speaker 3>of Doora until about this last half hour. Now I'm

0:55:45.800 --> 0:55:46.400
<v Speaker 3>just furious.

0:55:46.480 --> 0:55:48.440
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, He's been pretty open about the fact I'm not

0:55:48.440 --> 0:55:49.680
<v Speaker 4>the favorite child anymore.

0:55:51.440 --> 0:55:52.399
<v Speaker 3>Who do you think is.

0:55:54.440 --> 0:55:58.600
<v Speaker 4>Come on, You've said on the podcast that I'm not

0:55:58.640 --> 0:55:59.880
<v Speaker 4>the favorite child anymore.

0:56:00.200 --> 0:56:02.719
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but that was it was like Demand's last day.

0:56:02.760 --> 0:56:03.560
<v Speaker 3>I was trying to.

0:56:03.719 --> 0:56:05.800
<v Speaker 4>No, it was after he already work.

0:56:05.680 --> 0:56:07.840
<v Speaker 3>Him up, and your mom told me I have to

0:56:07.840 --> 0:56:11.640
<v Speaker 3>stop saying. You know, you're my favorite. I've always been

0:56:11.640 --> 0:56:14.480
<v Speaker 3>my favorite, all right. I love all my kids equally,

0:56:14.520 --> 0:56:15.200
<v Speaker 3>but I don't.

0:56:15.040 --> 0:56:17.120
<v Speaker 4>Like them anyway.

0:56:17.480 --> 0:56:19.680
<v Speaker 3>Oh but but it seems like Mike wants a rating

0:56:19.719 --> 0:56:20.360
<v Speaker 3>for you today.

0:56:21.000 --> 0:56:25.200
<v Speaker 4>No, no, I told you stop.

0:56:26.560 --> 0:56:30.279
<v Speaker 3>All right, Let's get Demand's video surprise video right now.

0:56:30.480 --> 0:56:34.480
<v Speaker 3>Let's so I apologize. I'm taking it now seven point one.

0:56:34.640 --> 0:56:38.800
<v Speaker 3>Let's see Demandy's video go without further ado.

0:56:39.400 --> 0:56:44.480
<v Speaker 5>Yes, yes, here we are, open it up. Pardon my

0:56:44.560 --> 0:56:48.359
<v Speaker 5>fan aid got a little plush blanky on her. Take

0:56:48.400 --> 0:56:51.080
<v Speaker 5>that off, and then what do you have?

0:56:52.239 --> 0:56:54.920
<v Speaker 3>You have this? I don't even really.

0:56:54.719 --> 0:56:57.600
<v Speaker 5>Know what to say about it. It's it's just it's

0:56:57.680 --> 0:57:00.400
<v Speaker 5>it's just so amazing, be awesome if I name are

0:57:00.440 --> 0:57:03.800
<v Speaker 5>on there. But I actually could.

0:57:03.680 --> 0:57:04.760
<v Speaker 3>Up an engraver earlier.

0:57:05.640 --> 0:57:08.400
<v Speaker 5>He's got some stuff in the works. We officially have

0:57:08.560 --> 0:57:11.080
<v Speaker 5>the one hundred thousand subscribers. You know it's not actual.

0:57:11.160 --> 0:57:12.000
<v Speaker 4>You don't actually have.

0:57:12.000 --> 0:57:14.640
<v Speaker 5>One hundred thousand subscribers until you have the plaque. Couldn't

0:57:14.640 --> 0:57:17.080
<v Speaker 5>have done it without you, guys. Thank you to everybody

0:57:17.080 --> 0:57:19.360
<v Speaker 5>that listens. Miss you guys. Can't wait to be with

0:57:19.400 --> 0:57:19.919
<v Speaker 5>you guys again.

0:57:20.480 --> 0:57:25.120
<v Speaker 3>And we got it. That is awesome. That is so cool.

0:57:25.200 --> 0:57:29.320
<v Speaker 3>We actually grow black and Demonse wearing his work clothes

0:57:29.640 --> 0:57:31.560
<v Speaker 3>looking all professional.

0:57:31.040 --> 0:57:31.960
<v Speaker 4>Got a polo on.

0:57:32.240 --> 0:57:33.080
<v Speaker 3>He looks great?

0:57:33.320 --> 0:57:33.920
<v Speaker 4>Right there?

0:57:34.080 --> 0:57:38.000
<v Speaker 3>You know what do you are? You are right? He's

0:57:38.040 --> 0:57:39.040
<v Speaker 3>back to be my favorite?

0:57:39.120 --> 0:57:42.120
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I bet we got one hundred thousand and.

0:57:42.040 --> 0:57:45.320
<v Speaker 3>Demmsey, don't you engrave that? There's no place to getting

0:57:45.360 --> 0:57:48.320
<v Speaker 3>blacks to hosts. It's the whole seat.

0:57:48.560 --> 0:57:50.400
<v Speaker 4>Oh so your name isn't on it?

0:57:50.840 --> 0:57:50.960
<v Speaker 5>Uh?

0:57:51.400 --> 0:57:55.120
<v Speaker 3>Literally is says what's right with Nick? Right literally on

0:57:55.160 --> 0:57:55.800
<v Speaker 3>the plat.

0:57:56.280 --> 0:57:58.120
<v Speaker 4>So you could do the show by yourself? Right, since

0:57:58.120 --> 0:58:01.280
<v Speaker 4>you're a host? I should just I have better things

0:58:01.320 --> 0:58:03.640
<v Speaker 4>to do. You know, I'm really cool, I'm really popular

0:58:03.720 --> 0:58:04.200
<v Speaker 4>and fun.

0:58:04.680 --> 0:58:08.240
<v Speaker 3>You know. See you guys Tuesday for episode one. Enjoy

0:58:08.320 --> 0:58:10.840
<v Speaker 3>the draft and the rest around one of the NBA playoffs.

0:58:10.840 --> 0:58:18.440
<v Speaker 3>See you guys. Then, what's right bye,