WEBVTT - TechStuff is Caught in a Tractor Beam

0:00:02.480 --> 0:00:05.480
<v Speaker 1>Get in touch with technology with tech Stuff from how

0:00:05.559 --> 0:00:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Stuff Looks Common Hated everyone and Welcome to tech Stuff.

0:00:14.480 --> 0:00:16.599
<v Speaker 1>My name is John and Strickland. I'm one of the

0:00:16.640 --> 0:00:19.279
<v Speaker 1>two hosts of our show, and I'm Lauren Volke Bam

0:00:19.280 --> 0:00:21.240
<v Speaker 1>and I'm not going to laugh at all this episode.

0:00:21.520 --> 0:00:24.040
<v Speaker 1>All right, that's fair. Podcasting is a very serious business.

0:00:24.040 --> 0:00:26.000
<v Speaker 1>It is. Let us, let us be somber, despite the

0:00:26.000 --> 0:00:29.680
<v Speaker 1>fact we're talking about a really cool futuristic technology. Tractor

0:00:29.760 --> 0:00:32.640
<v Speaker 1>bean tractor beans. Yes, yeah, this is This was something

0:00:32.680 --> 0:00:35.440
<v Speaker 1>that Lauren had suggested because she saw an item in

0:00:35.479 --> 0:00:37.840
<v Speaker 1>the news, and at the time, I would imagine Lauren

0:00:37.920 --> 0:00:41.360
<v Speaker 1>had no idea how incredibly complex a topic this would

0:00:41.360 --> 0:00:43.080
<v Speaker 1>turn out to be. Yeah, as it turns out, particle

0:00:43.080 --> 0:00:47.519
<v Speaker 1>physics is not simple necessarily, but we're gonna tackle it anyway.

0:00:47.640 --> 0:00:49.279
<v Speaker 1>We are. We are indeed, because you know what, we've

0:00:49.280 --> 0:00:51.080
<v Speaker 1>watched a lot of Star Trek between the two of us.

0:00:51.159 --> 0:00:53.560
<v Speaker 1>We have faith in ourselves. So let's let's talk about

0:00:53.560 --> 0:00:56.640
<v Speaker 1>what tractor beam is, especially in that realm of science fiction,

0:00:56.640 --> 0:00:59.240
<v Speaker 1>because I think that's where most people have encountered the

0:00:59.360 --> 0:01:02.640
<v Speaker 1>original Ida, right sure, and especially since tractor beams do

0:01:02.680 --> 0:01:06.360
<v Speaker 1>not exist as such in three dimensions in the real world,

0:01:06.440 --> 0:01:09.480
<v Speaker 1>yet not on the macro level anyway, right, not not

0:01:09.640 --> 0:01:12.080
<v Speaker 1>nothing that you could see with your own two eyeballs. Right,

0:01:12.360 --> 0:01:17.600
<v Speaker 1>So essentially it's a intergalactic tow truck kind of thing

0:01:18.680 --> 0:01:21.680
<v Speaker 1>beam of light that can be used to pull objects

0:01:21.720 --> 0:01:24.160
<v Speaker 1>towards the source of that light. Yeah, which is that's

0:01:24.160 --> 0:01:28.639
<v Speaker 1>pretty phenomenal because, as we understand in physics, light does

0:01:28.680 --> 0:01:33.480
<v Speaker 1>in fact exert a pressure. You might push stuff. Kepler

0:01:33.520 --> 0:01:37.120
<v Speaker 1>said that, Yep, exactly, Yep, yep, Kepler. Kepler observed this,

0:01:37.200 --> 0:01:40.200
<v Speaker 1>and in fact it serves as the basis for uh

0:01:40.360 --> 0:01:44.560
<v Speaker 1>futuristic technologies such as sun sales somewhere sales. These would

0:01:44.600 --> 0:01:49.120
<v Speaker 1>be enormous sales, literally sales that you would extend from

0:01:49.240 --> 0:01:53.760
<v Speaker 1>a spacecraft and allow sunlight to press against the sale

0:01:53.800 --> 0:01:57.320
<v Speaker 1>and thus propelled the StarCraft. Because you're talking about being

0:01:57.360 --> 0:02:00.600
<v Speaker 1>in an environment where there's no there's no graby that's

0:02:00.640 --> 0:02:03.600
<v Speaker 1>affecting you apart from well, I mean, they're gonna have

0:02:03.640 --> 0:02:06.600
<v Speaker 1>gravity within the Solar System, but you're not working like

0:02:06.640 --> 0:02:09.000
<v Speaker 1>trying to escape gravity. At that point. You're actually already

0:02:09.000 --> 0:02:12.959
<v Speaker 1>out in space, so you're not having to worry as

0:02:13.040 --> 0:02:16.120
<v Speaker 1>much about things like friction and gravity, so smaller forces,

0:02:16.160 --> 0:02:22.519
<v Speaker 1>for example, photons can so. So to have a kind

0:02:22.520 --> 0:02:25.560
<v Speaker 1>of light that would be able to trap an object

0:02:25.639 --> 0:02:29.600
<v Speaker 1>and even pull it in is sort of counterintuitive based

0:02:29.680 --> 0:02:33.400
<v Speaker 1>upon the knowledge that photons can push stuff away. So

0:02:33.960 --> 0:02:36.760
<v Speaker 1>we've seen tractor beams used in lots of different science

0:02:36.760 --> 0:02:38.720
<v Speaker 1>fiction you. Star Trek, of course, is one of the

0:02:38.760 --> 0:02:41.480
<v Speaker 1>big examples. Yeah. The first reference was actually in The

0:02:41.480 --> 0:02:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Skylark of Space, which was a drama by East Smith,

0:02:44.080 --> 0:02:49.800
<v Speaker 1>originally serialized and published a novel in I did not

0:02:49.880 --> 0:02:52.000
<v Speaker 1>know that. I do know that it's used in Star

0:02:52.080 --> 0:02:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Trek quite a bit. Uh. There are two things that

0:02:55.080 --> 0:02:57.480
<v Speaker 1>you have to remember about Star Trek tractor beams. They

0:02:57.480 --> 0:03:00.720
<v Speaker 1>can pull just about anything any air, and if you

0:03:00.760 --> 0:03:03.480
<v Speaker 1>reverse the polarity, you can turn it into a weapon. Well,

0:03:03.560 --> 0:03:05.760
<v Speaker 1>reversing the polarity, as we all know, is how you

0:03:05.760 --> 0:03:08.360
<v Speaker 1>do things in Star Trek. Yeah, I was explaining earlier.

0:03:08.400 --> 0:03:10.480
<v Speaker 1>It is the have you tried turning it off and

0:03:10.520 --> 0:03:13.520
<v Speaker 1>on again approach in Star Trek. If if it's something's

0:03:13.560 --> 0:03:17.480
<v Speaker 1>not working, reverse the polarity and then it works. Uh.

0:03:17.680 --> 0:03:19.760
<v Speaker 1>And then of course in Star Wars it was used

0:03:20.200 --> 0:03:24.120
<v Speaker 1>the Death Star catches the Millennium Falcon in a tractor

0:03:24.200 --> 0:03:26.799
<v Speaker 1>beam and a series of tractor beings a whole connexus

0:03:26.800 --> 0:03:28.840
<v Speaker 1>of tractor being right and pulls it back into the

0:03:28.840 --> 0:03:31.239
<v Speaker 1>Death Star so that the Millenium Falcon cannot make its

0:03:31.400 --> 0:03:34.800
<v Speaker 1>daring escape. This, of course allows Darth Vader to face

0:03:34.840 --> 0:03:37.520
<v Speaker 1>off against Obi Wan Kenobi, and I could go on,

0:03:37.680 --> 0:03:40.000
<v Speaker 1>but that's not what this episode is about. Also, I

0:03:40.040 --> 0:03:43.120
<v Speaker 1>suspect that a few of our listeners have seen Star Wars,

0:03:43.120 --> 0:03:46.720
<v Speaker 1>maybe one or two. Episode four is amazing. If you

0:03:46.720 --> 0:03:48.360
<v Speaker 1>have not seen it, you need to go check it out.

0:03:48.600 --> 0:03:52.040
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, Yeah, so, so science fiction is one of

0:03:52.040 --> 0:03:56.120
<v Speaker 1>those things that is a really useful tool for storytellers. Uh,

0:03:56.280 --> 0:03:59.840
<v Speaker 1>if they have a story about a ship encountering so

0:04:00.120 --> 0:04:03.400
<v Speaker 1>sort of wreck or other kind of of body out

0:04:03.400 --> 0:04:05.880
<v Speaker 1>in space, it needs to be pulled away. And the

0:04:06.000 --> 0:04:08.200
<v Speaker 1>nice thing is is that we've got scientists here on

0:04:08.240 --> 0:04:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Earth who are saying, hey, how can we do this

0:04:11.600 --> 0:04:16.200
<v Speaker 1>science fiction thing for reels? Right? Knowing how light behaves

0:04:16.279 --> 0:04:18.880
<v Speaker 1>and uh, and maybe finding new ways to make light

0:04:18.960 --> 0:04:23.080
<v Speaker 1>behave in perhaps an unexpected fashion. Well, I suspect that,

0:04:23.120 --> 0:04:26.160
<v Speaker 1>in fact, Star Trek used some actual research that was

0:04:26.200 --> 0:04:28.280
<v Speaker 1>going on in the nineteen sixties as a basis for

0:04:28.279 --> 0:04:31.279
<v Speaker 1>their tractor beam, because according according to the Star Trek universe,

0:04:31.320 --> 0:04:33.960
<v Speaker 1>the way that their tractor beam works is it's actually

0:04:34.040 --> 0:04:36.440
<v Speaker 1>a graviton force beam. And I just made a little

0:04:36.520 --> 0:04:38.799
<v Speaker 1>quote marks in the air for the benefit of nobody. Really,

0:04:38.839 --> 0:04:44.120
<v Speaker 1>so that was weird. Gravitons are hypothetical particles that that

0:04:44.320 --> 0:04:49.000
<v Speaker 1>essentially mediate the force of gravity. Uh, they're hypothetical because

0:04:49.000 --> 0:04:52.280
<v Speaker 1>we have not observed an actual graviton. We don't know

0:04:52.360 --> 0:04:54.920
<v Speaker 1>how we would. We don't we know that in order

0:04:55.040 --> 0:04:58.720
<v Speaker 1>for our quantum model of the universe to make sense,

0:04:59.360 --> 0:05:03.320
<v Speaker 1>we need something like a graviton to exist to explain

0:05:03.360 --> 0:05:06.640
<v Speaker 1>the force of gravity. There are four fundamental forces in

0:05:06.680 --> 0:05:11.440
<v Speaker 1>the universe. There's strong, nuclear, weak nuclear, electro magnetic, and gravity.

0:05:11.680 --> 0:05:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Out of those, gravity is the weakest, but it's also

0:05:14.240 --> 0:05:18.160
<v Speaker 1>the one that we cannot easily incorporate into the quantum

0:05:18.320 --> 0:05:22.240
<v Speaker 1>model of physics. Right, It's sort of assumed by Einstein's

0:05:22.279 --> 0:05:25.680
<v Speaker 1>general theory of relativity that gravitational waves are a thing

0:05:25.760 --> 0:05:30.400
<v Speaker 1>that exists that ripples in the spacetime continuum caused by

0:05:30.640 --> 0:05:34.600
<v Speaker 1>very large moving objects, particularly, but nobody has detected these

0:05:34.760 --> 0:05:37.320
<v Speaker 1>so so really the way we observe this is through

0:05:37.760 --> 0:05:40.039
<v Speaker 1>the force of gravity. I mean, that's that's that's we

0:05:40.080 --> 0:05:42.880
<v Speaker 1>can see the outcome. We just can't we can explain

0:05:43.520 --> 0:05:46.640
<v Speaker 1>exactly so, And to to explain to you guys how

0:05:46.720 --> 0:05:49.919
<v Speaker 1>weak gravity is in comparison to the other forces, here's

0:05:49.920 --> 0:05:53.800
<v Speaker 1>a very simple, uh experiment anyone can do anyone who

0:05:53.800 --> 0:05:57.120
<v Speaker 1>has access to a comb and a balloon. So let's

0:05:57.160 --> 0:05:59.360
<v Speaker 1>say you've got you know, get a balloon. You've just

0:05:59.600 --> 0:06:02.640
<v Speaker 1>inflay the balloon with oxygen. Don't do helium because that

0:06:02.640 --> 0:06:06.359
<v Speaker 1>will negate the results of this test. Check. So oxygen

0:06:06.440 --> 0:06:09.720
<v Speaker 1>inflated balloon, you sat down on a table. Gravity is

0:06:09.760 --> 0:06:14.000
<v Speaker 1>pulling the balloon downward. I am oversimplifying here, so physicists

0:06:14.000 --> 0:06:17.400
<v Speaker 1>please don't don't write in and complain. But the balloon

0:06:17.520 --> 0:06:20.040
<v Speaker 1>is held to the table in part due to friction,

0:06:20.080 --> 0:06:22.880
<v Speaker 1>but also in part due to gravity. If you were

0:06:22.880 --> 0:06:26.120
<v Speaker 1>to take your comb and rub it against say a sweater,

0:06:26.520 --> 0:06:28.839
<v Speaker 1>and get built up some stag electricity on the comb,

0:06:28.880 --> 0:06:31.240
<v Speaker 1>and then touch the comb to the balloon and lift,

0:06:31.640 --> 0:06:34.400
<v Speaker 1>you would see that the stag electricity that was generated

0:06:34.720 --> 0:06:37.240
<v Speaker 1>while you were rubbing the comb against your your sweater

0:06:37.760 --> 0:06:40.960
<v Speaker 1>would be enough to attract the balloon and lifted off

0:06:40.960 --> 0:06:44.520
<v Speaker 1>the table. That means that the any amount of electromatic force,

0:06:44.680 --> 0:06:47.080
<v Speaker 1>the static is stronger than the gravity. And the gravity, Yeah,

0:06:47.080 --> 0:06:50.640
<v Speaker 1>You've got an entire planet beneath you that that is

0:06:51.160 --> 0:06:55.560
<v Speaker 1>got this very strong gravitational pull, strong in comparison to

0:06:55.720 --> 0:06:58.960
<v Speaker 1>other things that we directly observe throughout the day. And

0:06:59.080 --> 0:07:02.120
<v Speaker 1>yet it is dwarfed by strong enough comb Yeah, strong

0:07:02.200 --> 0:07:04.440
<v Speaker 1>enough to pull a bowling ball from the top of

0:07:04.520 --> 0:07:08.120
<v Speaker 1>tower right right, so, and and gravity just so. To

0:07:08.720 --> 0:07:12.360
<v Speaker 1>complete the whole picture here, it depends on two things.

0:07:12.440 --> 0:07:15.760
<v Speaker 1>It depends on really you have to have two different bodies,

0:07:15.800 --> 0:07:18.760
<v Speaker 1>but it depends on the body's mass and their distance

0:07:18.840 --> 0:07:23.280
<v Speaker 1>from one another. But they do exert gravity, a gravitational

0:07:23.280 --> 0:07:26.400
<v Speaker 1>pull against each other. So, for instance, I have a

0:07:26.440 --> 0:07:29.520
<v Speaker 1>cup of tea in front of me. I am exerting

0:07:29.560 --> 0:07:32.400
<v Speaker 1>a very tiny gravitational pull on the cup of tea,

0:07:32.440 --> 0:07:35.520
<v Speaker 1>and it is exerting a very tiny gravitational pull on me.

0:07:35.560 --> 0:07:38.440
<v Speaker 1>Now this is dwarfed by the fact that I'm also

0:07:38.560 --> 0:07:40.600
<v Speaker 1>on the planet Earth, and that the Earth is exerting

0:07:40.640 --> 0:07:43.960
<v Speaker 1>gravitational force on both of you. Right, So I you know,

0:07:44.000 --> 0:07:46.280
<v Speaker 1>I can't observe this. I don't really, I'm not aware

0:07:46.320 --> 0:07:50.080
<v Speaker 1>of it in any way, but that's that's yeah. So

0:07:51.160 --> 0:07:55.600
<v Speaker 1>keeping that in mind, one easy, relatively easy way of

0:07:55.680 --> 0:07:58.880
<v Speaker 1>having a tractor beam like effect, even though you wouldn't

0:07:59.040 --> 0:08:03.040
<v Speaker 1>be being mean anything, is to use the gravity of

0:08:03.160 --> 0:08:08.040
<v Speaker 1>one object to influence the movement of another object. Now,

0:08:08.080 --> 0:08:11.800
<v Speaker 1>this is something that we've talked about before on tech stuff,

0:08:11.800 --> 0:08:14.760
<v Speaker 1>when we were chatting about could an asteroid destroy the

0:08:14.800 --> 0:08:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Earth if, if, if some space agency. I was gonna

0:08:18.560 --> 0:08:21.240
<v Speaker 1>say NASA because that's the one that I'm most familiar with.

0:08:21.240 --> 0:08:25.440
<v Speaker 1>But if NASA were too identified that an asteroid twenty

0:08:25.520 --> 0:08:32.360
<v Speaker 1>years away has the the uh, the potential to h Yeah,

0:08:32.400 --> 0:08:35.160
<v Speaker 1>that would be a bad thing. Yes, as we all

0:08:35.240 --> 0:08:38.480
<v Speaker 1>learned in the documentary Armageddon. Yes, that wonder whole documentary

0:08:38.520 --> 0:08:40.360
<v Speaker 1>that taught me that Steve Busimmy is a better singer

0:08:40.400 --> 0:08:44.080
<v Speaker 1>than Ben Affleck uh, which I had no way of

0:08:44.120 --> 0:08:47.280
<v Speaker 1>knowing until I saw that anyway, that one way of

0:08:47.400 --> 0:08:52.199
<v Speaker 1>potentially deflecting the asteroid would be to send a spacecraft

0:08:52.280 --> 0:08:55.040
<v Speaker 1>up so that you move the spacecraft so it's close

0:08:55.160 --> 0:08:57.560
<v Speaker 1>enough to the asteroid so that they are are pulling

0:08:57.600 --> 0:09:01.240
<v Speaker 1>one another with a gravitational hole, and then you use

0:09:01.280 --> 0:09:05.560
<v Speaker 1>thrusters with the spacecraft to just very slowly push just

0:09:05.679 --> 0:09:09.040
<v Speaker 1>not really really it's pull. You're yeah, you're pulling the

0:09:09.080 --> 0:09:12.240
<v Speaker 1>asteroid because as you move the spacecraft away, the gravitational

0:09:12.280 --> 0:09:15.200
<v Speaker 1>pull makes the asteroid move with it, and all you

0:09:15.240 --> 0:09:17.320
<v Speaker 1>have to do is move it. The further out you

0:09:17.400 --> 0:09:20.080
<v Speaker 1>go from Earth, the less you need to move the

0:09:20.080 --> 0:09:23.240
<v Speaker 1>asteroids so that it has it misses the Earth, right,

0:09:23.280 --> 0:09:26.360
<v Speaker 1>because you're talking about angles, So a couple of degrees

0:09:26.800 --> 0:09:29.720
<v Speaker 1>of difference way the way way the heck out in

0:09:29.800 --> 0:09:32.760
<v Speaker 1>space to make enough difference to not kill everything on it, right,

0:09:32.760 --> 0:09:34.959
<v Speaker 1>it will miss the planet entirely. So that's the idea.

0:09:35.040 --> 0:09:37.640
<v Speaker 1>So that's kind of like a tractor beam in the

0:09:37.640 --> 0:09:40.280
<v Speaker 1>sense that you're using an object to tow another object,

0:09:40.760 --> 0:09:43.160
<v Speaker 1>in this case objects that are in space, but you're

0:09:43.160 --> 0:09:46.640
<v Speaker 1>not actually shooting a beam of anything, right, However, it's

0:09:46.640 --> 0:09:48.560
<v Speaker 1>not it's not made of light. It doesn't do that

0:09:48.640 --> 0:09:51.400
<v Speaker 1>cool visual effect. Does you have a sound effect, which

0:09:51.480 --> 0:09:55.040
<v Speaker 1>obviously that would not not anything in space anyway? Sure,

0:09:55.720 --> 0:09:59.319
<v Speaker 1>but hey, why why should we start criticizing Now that's

0:09:59.320 --> 0:10:01.920
<v Speaker 1>a that's a whole of an episode. Um and and

0:10:02.400 --> 0:10:05.520
<v Speaker 1>so in the nineteen sixties, people were really excited about

0:10:05.559 --> 0:10:09.160
<v Speaker 1>detecting gravitational waves, and a few people in fact suggested

0:10:09.240 --> 0:10:12.800
<v Speaker 1>that we might make a gravity laser. A couple of people,

0:10:12.800 --> 0:10:16.360
<v Speaker 1>Helper and Laurent, proposed that this could be called a gazer,

0:10:16.520 --> 0:10:19.320
<v Speaker 1>which I think is a terrific word. Yeah, and I

0:10:19.360 --> 0:10:22.640
<v Speaker 1>think means something entirely different. These are modern times, I think, yeah,

0:10:22.679 --> 0:10:24.319
<v Speaker 1>I think I agree with you. I think at this

0:10:24.400 --> 0:10:28.640
<v Speaker 1>point the scientific community would say, can we can? We can?

0:10:28.640 --> 0:10:33.000
<v Speaker 1>We can? We vote on this um. They proposed that

0:10:33.080 --> 0:10:35.959
<v Speaker 1>we could vibrate sometimes of electric crystals and create a

0:10:35.960 --> 0:10:38.400
<v Speaker 1>whole thing, And but that's it's never really come to

0:10:38.480 --> 0:10:42.280
<v Speaker 1>fruition because the above re we have never discovered gravitons,

0:10:42.360 --> 0:10:45.320
<v Speaker 1>We have never measured gravitational waves. Right, for us to

0:10:45.400 --> 0:10:48.480
<v Speaker 1>be able to create an object that would use gravitons

0:10:48.600 --> 0:10:51.440
<v Speaker 1>to to make a tractor beam, we first sort of

0:10:51.520 --> 0:10:54.559
<v Speaker 1>need to prove that gravitons in fact exist, yes, because

0:10:54.559 --> 0:10:56.800
<v Speaker 1>again they're hypothetical right now. It's sort of like the

0:10:56.880 --> 0:11:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Higgs boson, right The Higgs boson was a theoretical particle

0:11:00.960 --> 0:11:05.280
<v Speaker 1>that physicists said for our understanding of the universe to

0:11:05.440 --> 0:11:09.760
<v Speaker 1>make sense, we need this thing to exist to explain

0:11:09.840 --> 0:11:13.080
<v Speaker 1>why matter has mass same sort of thing. In order

0:11:13.120 --> 0:11:16.280
<v Speaker 1>for our understanding of gravity to make sense within the

0:11:16.920 --> 0:11:19.719
<v Speaker 1>within the framework that we have of our knowledge of

0:11:19.760 --> 0:11:23.439
<v Speaker 1>the universe, knowing that we are by our very nature

0:11:23.559 --> 0:11:27.720
<v Speaker 1>limited in our understanding, a graviton needs to exist for

0:11:27.880 --> 0:11:32.640
<v Speaker 1>that model to really make sense. So we're talking about mathematically, yes,

0:11:33.160 --> 0:11:35.960
<v Speaker 1>these things have to exist, but in reality we just

0:11:36.160 --> 0:11:38.640
<v Speaker 1>haven't tracked it down yet. So if we ever do,

0:11:38.920 --> 0:11:42.319
<v Speaker 1>maybe we can make some sort of technology that can

0:11:42.360 --> 0:11:45.400
<v Speaker 1>take advantage of that. But until then, until then, maybe

0:11:45.400 --> 0:11:49.719
<v Speaker 1>no gravitational lasers. Yeah, I personally hope that we do

0:11:49.960 --> 0:11:52.559
<v Speaker 1>crack that nut, because that would be I mean, it

0:11:52.600 --> 0:11:55.920
<v Speaker 1>would be an incredibly useful tool, and not just in

0:11:56.000 --> 0:11:59.160
<v Speaker 1>the context of space exploration. That's the one that we

0:11:59.200 --> 0:12:01.480
<v Speaker 1>all think about, but us again in science fiction, that

0:12:01.520 --> 0:12:04.280
<v Speaker 1>tends to be where tractor beams come into play. But

0:12:04.320 --> 0:12:07.640
<v Speaker 1>as it turns out, tractor beams can have a really

0:12:07.760 --> 0:12:11.880
<v Speaker 1>useful uhuh, well in implementation here on Earth and space

0:12:12.000 --> 0:12:15.319
<v Speaker 1>on the planet, and I mean, moving things is hard,

0:12:16.000 --> 0:12:19.000
<v Speaker 1>they're heavy or even if they're or they're really small,

0:12:19.720 --> 0:12:23.040
<v Speaker 1>and so uh yeah, we'll talk a bit in a

0:12:23.200 --> 0:12:29.520
<v Speaker 1>second all about how some scientists are making micro versions

0:12:29.600 --> 0:12:32.960
<v Speaker 1>of tractor beams here on Earth and what those could

0:12:33.000 --> 0:12:35.679
<v Speaker 1>be used for. But first, let's take a moment to

0:12:35.720 --> 0:12:38.920
<v Speaker 1>thank our sponsor for this episode, and now back to

0:12:38.920 --> 0:12:41.559
<v Speaker 1>the show. All right, So we've talked about using gravity

0:12:41.920 --> 0:12:46.040
<v Speaker 1>to create a tractor beam like effect, or possibly even

0:12:46.120 --> 0:12:49.800
<v Speaker 1>using gravitons, assuming we ever understand them. But that's not

0:12:49.880 --> 0:12:53.480
<v Speaker 1>the only way scientists are looking into creating a tractor

0:12:53.520 --> 0:12:56.760
<v Speaker 1>beam like device. There's actually been quite a bit of

0:12:56.760 --> 0:13:01.959
<v Speaker 1>news over the last decade about scientists using various ways

0:13:02.160 --> 0:13:06.160
<v Speaker 1>of manipulating light to pull an object as opposed to

0:13:06.200 --> 0:13:09.959
<v Speaker 1>push it away. Right, Starting way back in six people

0:13:10.120 --> 0:13:14.079
<v Speaker 1>started playing with what's called optical tweezers, which are lasers

0:13:14.080 --> 0:13:18.160
<v Speaker 1>that are capable of manipulating molecules and moving them with precision.

0:13:18.600 --> 0:13:22.840
<v Speaker 1>And now this is not pulling a particle towards the

0:13:22.920 --> 0:13:26.120
<v Speaker 1>light source, so it's not technically attractor beam, right, but

0:13:26.200 --> 0:13:30.160
<v Speaker 1>it is. It is a method of manipulating microscopic particles

0:13:30.280 --> 0:13:32.920
<v Speaker 1>very precisely. So if you're thinking about a plane like

0:13:32.960 --> 0:13:37.040
<v Speaker 1>an X and y axis, you could move particles within

0:13:37.120 --> 0:13:39.439
<v Speaker 1>the X and y axis, but you're not moving them

0:13:39.440 --> 0:13:42.360
<v Speaker 1>along the Z axis. That would be you know, from

0:13:42.400 --> 0:13:45.480
<v Speaker 1>the source of light to wherever the particle is. So

0:13:45.600 --> 0:13:47.840
<v Speaker 1>in relation to the source of light, the particle would

0:13:47.880 --> 0:13:51.200
<v Speaker 1>not get closer further away, but you could trap it

0:13:51.320 --> 0:13:54.920
<v Speaker 1>and move it within that x y plane. That's that's

0:13:54.920 --> 0:13:57.800
<v Speaker 1>my understanding. Yeah, yeah, and these are well, I I

0:13:58.120 --> 0:14:00.719
<v Speaker 1>that's my understanding as well. These the laser beams that

0:14:00.760 --> 0:14:03.640
<v Speaker 1>are being used for this have a Gaussian intensity profiles,

0:14:03.679 --> 0:14:05.960
<v Speaker 1>which means that they're brighter in the center than they

0:14:05.960 --> 0:14:09.040
<v Speaker 1>are at the edges. Right. A Gaussian distribution is a

0:14:09.080 --> 0:14:13.839
<v Speaker 1>normal distribution, and it can be for anything from lasers too. Really,

0:14:13.960 --> 0:14:16.240
<v Speaker 1>you can even see this in social sciences where you

0:14:16.280 --> 0:14:18.840
<v Speaker 1>do a survey and you have a bell curve that

0:14:18.840 --> 0:14:23.600
<v Speaker 1>shows a normal distribution that's essentially a Gaussian distribution. So, okay,

0:14:23.720 --> 0:14:26.360
<v Speaker 1>light has momentum right, right, and so when it hits

0:14:26.360 --> 0:14:29.680
<v Speaker 1>an object, the object bends the light, which changes its momentum,

0:14:30.040 --> 0:14:33.400
<v Speaker 1>and thus the object is pushed back equally and oppositely

0:14:33.520 --> 0:14:36.320
<v Speaker 1>by the light. Okay, I see, so the lights momentum

0:14:36.320 --> 0:14:39.560
<v Speaker 1>has changed. The object's momentum is also changed, correct according

0:14:39.560 --> 0:14:41.960
<v Speaker 1>to the conservation of momentum, which you can see in

0:14:42.360 --> 0:14:48.280
<v Speaker 1>normal non microscopic classic physics. Right, And so the Gaussian

0:14:48.320 --> 0:14:50.480
<v Speaker 1>beam is important because if the sample gets off center

0:14:50.560 --> 0:14:52.280
<v Speaker 1>in the beam, the weaker light of the edges is

0:14:52.320 --> 0:14:54.720
<v Speaker 1>bending around the object and pushing it out, but the

0:14:54.720 --> 0:14:57.120
<v Speaker 1>stronger lighted center is bending around it and pushing it

0:14:57.160 --> 0:15:00.920
<v Speaker 1>back in, and the stronger force winds. I see. Oh okay, yeah,

0:15:01.000 --> 0:15:03.400
<v Speaker 1>that makes way more sense than everything else I read,

0:15:04.040 --> 0:15:06.760
<v Speaker 1>because everything I read was a lot of this. This

0:15:07.120 --> 0:15:09.520
<v Speaker 1>research that we did for this particular podcast is in

0:15:09.840 --> 0:15:12.440
<v Speaker 1>is from scientific journals and uh, and this is a

0:15:12.440 --> 0:15:15.200
<v Speaker 1>good point for us to make. Lauren and I we're

0:15:15.280 --> 0:15:20.600
<v Speaker 1>advocates of science education. We both love science. That being said,

0:15:20.640 --> 0:15:23.840
<v Speaker 1>neither of us are scientists, and we certainly are not

0:15:23.920 --> 0:15:26.960
<v Speaker 1>particle physicists. And so when you get down to the

0:15:27.040 --> 0:15:30.640
<v Speaker 1>quantum level, there's a certain level of understanding that we

0:15:30.680 --> 0:15:33.760
<v Speaker 1>are able to achieve. And beyond that, this stuff is

0:15:33.840 --> 0:15:36.280
<v Speaker 1>my It is like magic to us. So we're going

0:15:36.320 --> 0:15:39.520
<v Speaker 1>to explain things as best we can, but please understand

0:15:39.560 --> 0:15:44.000
<v Speaker 1>there are subtleties to this that we cannot easily uh explain,

0:15:44.040 --> 0:15:47.360
<v Speaker 1>because we haven't dedicated our lives to understanding them exactly.

0:15:48.000 --> 0:15:50.320
<v Speaker 1>And and but so if we get anything wrong, please

0:15:50.360 --> 0:15:52.600
<v Speaker 1>do right us in Um, we love getting that kind

0:15:52.640 --> 0:15:56.040
<v Speaker 1>of feedback, right, Yeah, No, we definitely want to to

0:15:56.080 --> 0:15:59.440
<v Speaker 1>communicate the correct information as best we can. But uh,

0:15:59.480 --> 0:16:02.240
<v Speaker 1>you know this, this is exciting stuff. So in this case,

0:16:02.320 --> 0:16:06.400
<v Speaker 1>what Laurence talking about is using light to to uh

0:16:07.120 --> 0:16:13.120
<v Speaker 1>to isolate and then manipulate microscopic particles. But at this

0:16:13.160 --> 0:16:15.960
<v Speaker 1>point the stage what we're talking about does not include

0:16:16.040 --> 0:16:20.560
<v Speaker 1>pulling those particles towards the light source. However, we have discovered,

0:16:20.720 --> 0:16:24.240
<v Speaker 1>or rather I should say we not reedibly smart people

0:16:24.280 --> 0:16:27.360
<v Speaker 1>have discovered ways of using light to actually pull things

0:16:27.440 --> 0:16:31.080
<v Speaker 1>towards the source in a bunch of different ways. Actually, um,

0:16:31.120 --> 0:16:35.240
<v Speaker 1>there's one of those is called an optical vortex. Um.

0:16:35.400 --> 0:16:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Sounds kind of kind of freaky, uh people. The the

0:16:39.680 --> 0:16:42.400
<v Speaker 1>main research that I've read from this was from Australian

0:16:42.480 --> 0:16:47.600
<v Speaker 1>National University around so pretty recently, and the the idea

0:16:47.600 --> 0:16:50.160
<v Speaker 1>of this one is that they use a hollow laser

0:16:50.160 --> 0:16:55.160
<v Speaker 1>beam to trap light absorbing particles, and um, they get

0:16:55.200 --> 0:16:57.320
<v Speaker 1>trapped in the center of this laser beam because the

0:16:57.440 --> 0:17:01.320
<v Speaker 1>heated air molecules around them are pushing in on them goutches,

0:17:01.440 --> 0:17:04.080
<v Speaker 1>so they cannot they can't escape the laser beam. They're

0:17:04.080 --> 0:17:06.720
<v Speaker 1>stuck in that little hollow center in the hollow center

0:17:06.840 --> 0:17:12.840
<v Speaker 1>in the in the the doughnuts shaped laguer Gaussian laser beam. Yes,

0:17:13.359 --> 0:17:16.399
<v Speaker 1>that right there, that thing exactly that you just said. Yeah,

0:17:16.560 --> 0:17:19.720
<v Speaker 1>I have the note. I'm so glad that you did

0:17:19.760 --> 0:17:22.040
<v Speaker 1>more research on this, because when I read that, my

0:17:22.119 --> 0:17:24.840
<v Speaker 1>eyes kind of glazed over. Yeah. Apparently they were able

0:17:24.880 --> 0:17:27.879
<v Speaker 1>to move particles about one and a half meters in

0:17:27.920 --> 0:17:30.520
<v Speaker 1>the air. Yeah, it's it's really exciting. By they found

0:17:30.520 --> 0:17:34.480
<v Speaker 1>out that by using too concentric hollow lasers, they can

0:17:34.760 --> 0:17:36.760
<v Speaker 1>adjust to the brightness of the two of them, there

0:17:36.760 --> 0:17:40.360
<v Speaker 1>by heating and cooling the air around the molecules and

0:17:40.359 --> 0:17:43.920
<v Speaker 1>and then therefore have the molecules move up and down

0:17:43.960 --> 0:17:47.320
<v Speaker 1>as they will through this hollow tube of light. Wow.

0:17:47.520 --> 0:17:49.720
<v Speaker 1>So so you're using two different lasers in order to

0:17:50.280 --> 0:17:52.680
<v Speaker 1>make that maintain this kind of movement. That makes sense,

0:17:52.680 --> 0:17:55.800
<v Speaker 1>I understand now. Yeah, I was wondering how that worked beforehand.

0:17:55.840 --> 0:17:57.639
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, that that totally makes sense. And yeah, and

0:17:57.640 --> 0:18:00.440
<v Speaker 1>these are nanofoam particles that they were using to the

0:18:00.760 --> 0:18:02.960
<v Speaker 1>got transported over a meter and and all of this

0:18:03.040 --> 0:18:06.359
<v Speaker 1>is on the scale again of a very microscopic things. Right,

0:18:06.880 --> 0:18:08.800
<v Speaker 1>That's something that's important, and we'll talk a little bit

0:18:08.840 --> 0:18:11.000
<v Speaker 1>more about that when we finish with all the different

0:18:11.080 --> 0:18:14.920
<v Speaker 1>laser methods. But yeah, the methods we're talking about are

0:18:15.080 --> 0:18:18.640
<v Speaker 1>very exciting, Don't get us wrong. They are incredibly exciting,

0:18:18.680 --> 0:18:23.520
<v Speaker 1>particularly in certain very specific implementations like in the medical field.

0:18:23.560 --> 0:18:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, this is all going to be extremely exciting

0:18:26.240 --> 0:18:31.240
<v Speaker 1>for for example, removing bacteria from samples, sorting cells, imnically

0:18:31.480 --> 0:18:34.119
<v Speaker 1>manipulating DNA strands is something that optical tweezers have been

0:18:34.160 --> 0:18:37.000
<v Speaker 1>used extensively for, right, so that there are really uses

0:18:37.040 --> 0:18:40.159
<v Speaker 1>for this. But these are not the same technologies that

0:18:40.200 --> 0:18:43.960
<v Speaker 1>will let us move spacecraft like toe spacecraft away. And

0:18:43.960 --> 0:18:45.639
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk about why that is when we get a

0:18:45.680 --> 0:18:47.199
<v Speaker 1>little further in, because there are a couple of other

0:18:47.280 --> 0:18:50.560
<v Speaker 1>laser methods that we need to talk about, right right, Um,

0:18:51.119 --> 0:18:53.520
<v Speaker 1>back back on the kind of sale, the sort of

0:18:53.520 --> 0:18:57.840
<v Speaker 1>solar sale theme that we were discussing earlier. Optical lift

0:18:58.119 --> 0:19:02.359
<v Speaker 1>is another version of of light that can be used

0:19:02.359 --> 0:19:05.920
<v Speaker 1>to do stuff. It's it's actually just a really simple

0:19:05.960 --> 0:19:09.800
<v Speaker 1>analog of aerodynamic lift, which of course is when um,

0:19:09.880 --> 0:19:13.960
<v Speaker 1>you create huh, how is it it's higher pressure under

0:19:13.960 --> 0:19:16.640
<v Speaker 1>awing than over a wing, and therefore letting a plane

0:19:16.680 --> 0:19:19.720
<v Speaker 1>lift off the ground in the game. Before we get

0:19:19.720 --> 0:19:24.800
<v Speaker 1>any further physicists, that's also an oversimplification, and we acknowledge that, yes,

0:19:25.040 --> 0:19:28.280
<v Speaker 1>there's more than just there's more than just that when

0:19:28.320 --> 0:19:31.080
<v Speaker 1>it comes to getting an airplane off the ground. Absolutely

0:19:31.080 --> 0:19:33.480
<v Speaker 1>know all about the other forward momentum and everything else,

0:19:33.520 --> 0:19:36.440
<v Speaker 1>but but that that is the concept of lift. Yes,

0:19:37.000 --> 0:19:40.680
<v Speaker 1>thank you, And so to get slightly fewer angry emails,

0:19:40.760 --> 0:19:43.040
<v Speaker 1>it's only because Chris and I received all of those

0:19:43.040 --> 0:19:47.800
<v Speaker 1>emails already, but but deservedly so, right, Oh no, absolutely, yes,

0:19:48.040 --> 0:19:53.120
<v Speaker 1>we love negative feedback. But so I nearly spit tea

0:19:53.200 --> 0:19:56.560
<v Speaker 1>all over my laptop. Please don't take that as a

0:19:56.560 --> 0:19:59.520
<v Speaker 1>as a Please don't take Lawrence. Lawrence's statement as a

0:19:59.760 --> 0:20:02.000
<v Speaker 1>knee means to send us the most negative feedback ever,

0:20:02.080 --> 0:20:06.000
<v Speaker 1>because my feelings do get hurt. Oh and I, I

0:20:06.040 --> 0:20:08.119
<v Speaker 1>apparent you just made a complete liar out of me.

0:20:08.240 --> 0:20:13.960
<v Speaker 1>That you almost snorfing your tea completely made me crack up. Excellent.

0:20:14.240 --> 0:20:19.720
<v Speaker 1>But anyway back to optical lift, it's uh. The scientists

0:20:19.720 --> 0:20:21.800
<v Speaker 1>have discovered that that you can take an object with

0:20:21.840 --> 0:20:24.920
<v Speaker 1>a differently shaped top and bottom surface, and it will

0:20:24.960 --> 0:20:27.560
<v Speaker 1>experience a lift force when placed in a uniform stream

0:20:27.600 --> 0:20:31.640
<v Speaker 1>of light that's fast. This is all blowing my mind

0:20:31.640 --> 0:20:34.800
<v Speaker 1>because before we did this research, I never knew about

0:20:34.840 --> 0:20:37.480
<v Speaker 1>these different properties of light and and it just it

0:20:37.560 --> 0:20:41.280
<v Speaker 1>really stresses to me one amazing universe. This is, you know,

0:20:41.400 --> 0:20:44.760
<v Speaker 1>to know that things behave on such a different level

0:20:44.800 --> 0:20:49.520
<v Speaker 1>than my previous understanding, and also illustrates quite effectively how

0:20:49.560 --> 0:20:53.400
<v Speaker 1>ignorant I am. But I love to learn, so that's okay, Yeah,

0:20:53.440 --> 0:20:55.159
<v Speaker 1>we get we get paid to learn this stuff and

0:20:55.160 --> 0:20:57.120
<v Speaker 1>pass it on to you, which is basically the most

0:20:57.119 --> 0:21:01.199
<v Speaker 1>exciting thing. Um. One of the other categories that I

0:21:01.240 --> 0:21:05.040
<v Speaker 1>ran across were optical conveyors, which are really fun. Those

0:21:05.040 --> 0:21:07.080
<v Speaker 1>are those are the ones that are using bessel beams,

0:21:07.320 --> 0:21:09.240
<v Speaker 1>and I think I think Jonathan has a whole section

0:21:09.280 --> 0:21:10.840
<v Speaker 1>about this one. Yeah, not a whole section, but I

0:21:10.840 --> 0:21:12.959
<v Speaker 1>can at least tell you what a bessel beam is,

0:21:13.040 --> 0:21:16.520
<v Speaker 1>because when I encountered that term, I thought, huh, what

0:21:16.520 --> 0:21:19.280
<v Speaker 1>what exactly do they mean by bessel beam? It's a

0:21:19.320 --> 0:21:24.640
<v Speaker 1>specific type of radiation, and that sort of radiation can

0:21:24.680 --> 0:21:27.879
<v Speaker 1>be a laser, it can be electromagnetic, it can be acoustic,

0:21:27.920 --> 0:21:30.840
<v Speaker 1>it could be gravitational. It doesn't really matter what the

0:21:30.920 --> 0:21:34.600
<v Speaker 1>type of radiation is. It's the form it takes. And

0:21:34.640 --> 0:21:38.600
<v Speaker 1>that form as a radiation where the amplitude is described

0:21:38.640 --> 0:21:41.560
<v Speaker 1>by a Bessel function of the first kind. Does that

0:21:41.640 --> 0:21:46.320
<v Speaker 1>mean essentially, it means that as this radiation moves forward,

0:21:46.720 --> 0:21:50.040
<v Speaker 1>it does not diffract in any way. It doesn't diffuse,

0:21:50.080 --> 0:21:53.720
<v Speaker 1>it does not spread out. In other words, it remains concentrated.

0:21:54.160 --> 0:21:56.399
<v Speaker 1>So what we think of that like a laser beam.

0:21:56.440 --> 0:21:58.880
<v Speaker 1>When you shine a laser beam, it doesn't spread out

0:21:58.920 --> 0:22:02.240
<v Speaker 1>like a flashlight does. But this is a very specific

0:22:02.320 --> 0:22:04.600
<v Speaker 1>format of that. And in fact, because actually those those

0:22:04.680 --> 0:22:07.200
<v Speaker 1>laser beams that were that you point at something are

0:22:07.359 --> 0:22:10.239
<v Speaker 1>Gaussian laser beams. That's we discussed there, and so this

0:22:10.320 --> 0:22:12.840
<v Speaker 1>is different, is different. This is different. It is it

0:22:12.960 --> 0:22:15.960
<v Speaker 1>is focused, It does not diffract in any way, it

0:22:15.960 --> 0:22:19.160
<v Speaker 1>does not spread out at all. And in fact, one

0:22:19.359 --> 0:22:23.480
<v Speaker 1>a a a feature of a true vessel beam would

0:22:23.480 --> 0:22:26.520
<v Speaker 1>be that if you were to just interrupt part of

0:22:26.520 --> 0:22:28.960
<v Speaker 1>this vessel beam, let's let's imagine that the vessel beam

0:22:29.080 --> 0:22:31.879
<v Speaker 1>is as big around as a pencil, Okay, just for

0:22:31.960 --> 0:22:36.879
<v Speaker 1>the purposes of illustration, and then Imagine that you had, uh,

0:22:37.200 --> 0:22:39.480
<v Speaker 1>used a sheet of paper and cut a little slit

0:22:39.560 --> 0:22:41.480
<v Speaker 1>in that pencil, and you make the sheet of paper

0:22:41.520 --> 0:22:44.400
<v Speaker 1>interrupt the vessel beam. Right, So you've got the sheet

0:22:44.440 --> 0:22:46.640
<v Speaker 1>of paper that's interrupting half the vessel beam. The other

0:22:46.680 --> 0:22:50.560
<v Speaker 1>half is going beyond the edge of the paper. A

0:22:50.640 --> 0:22:55.879
<v Speaker 1>true vessel beam will heal itself beyond the point of interruption.

0:22:56.040 --> 0:22:58.440
<v Speaker 1>So if I were to interrupt that beam further down

0:22:58.440 --> 0:23:00.320
<v Speaker 1>the beam, it would become whole against so it would

0:23:00.359 --> 0:23:04.840
<v Speaker 1>be the same diameter as it was um at the

0:23:05.880 --> 0:23:09.880
<v Speaker 1>before a point where you had that interruption. So that's

0:23:09.880 --> 0:23:12.199
<v Speaker 1>an awesome thing about a vessel beam. Now here's the

0:23:12.320 --> 0:23:16.119
<v Speaker 1>here's the caveat. A true vessel beam would require essentially

0:23:16.359 --> 0:23:22.480
<v Speaker 1>unlimited power. Uh So Dr Doom would want to make one, certainly,

0:23:22.840 --> 0:23:24.960
<v Speaker 1>but none of us would be capable of doing it.

0:23:24.960 --> 0:23:29.320
<v Speaker 1>It's a true vessel beam is effectively impossible for us

0:23:29.320 --> 0:23:32.919
<v Speaker 1>to make. We can make things that approach vessel beams

0:23:33.000 --> 0:23:36.800
<v Speaker 1>and that emulate many of its features, but a true

0:23:36.800 --> 0:23:40.720
<v Speaker 1>one is beyond our capability. That is the short and

0:23:40.760 --> 0:23:43.280
<v Speaker 1>sweet definition of vessel beam. And do keep in mind

0:23:43.359 --> 0:23:45.520
<v Speaker 1>we're not just talking lasers, Like I said, it could

0:23:45.520 --> 0:23:48.280
<v Speaker 1>even be acoustic, so you could create a vessel beam

0:23:48.280 --> 0:23:51.080
<v Speaker 1>of acoustic energy and make a noise that could be

0:23:51.119 --> 0:23:53.600
<v Speaker 1>heard perfectly at the destination, no matter how far away

0:23:53.640 --> 0:23:57.520
<v Speaker 1>it was. That that is fascinating, pretty awesome, That's terrific.

0:23:58.480 --> 0:24:01.479
<v Speaker 1>So so researchers are using these. Specifically, some people at

0:24:01.520 --> 0:24:04.640
<v Speaker 1>New York University, building on research by a Chinese team

0:24:04.640 --> 0:24:07.639
<v Speaker 1>at the a Star Data Storage Institute, I believe in

0:24:07.680 --> 0:24:12.280
<v Speaker 1>around two thousand people have been working on using a

0:24:12.359 --> 0:24:15.240
<v Speaker 1>lens to bend and overlap two of these vessel beams

0:24:15.600 --> 0:24:20.680
<v Speaker 1>um thereby creating what I can crudely, crudely describe a

0:24:20.760 --> 0:24:24.399
<v Speaker 1>kind of a strobe effect that will, Okay, it'll hit

0:24:24.440 --> 0:24:27.399
<v Speaker 1>the front of a particle, and because of that, because

0:24:27.400 --> 0:24:31.040
<v Speaker 1>it can reform around an object, it will reform behind

0:24:31.080 --> 0:24:33.960
<v Speaker 1>the particle with enough energy that it actually pushes the

0:24:34.000 --> 0:24:36.560
<v Speaker 1>particle back towards the light source. All right, So what's

0:24:36.560 --> 0:24:40.679
<v Speaker 1>happening is the photon is is hitting the particle in

0:24:40.720 --> 0:24:42.600
<v Speaker 1>such a way as to give it a little kick

0:24:42.720 --> 0:24:46.680
<v Speaker 1>back toward the actual source of the photons correct, which

0:24:46.680 --> 0:24:49.919
<v Speaker 1>is kind of crazy. It's awesome. Like, there was one

0:24:49.920 --> 0:24:51.679
<v Speaker 1>point where I was reading one of these descriptions, and

0:24:51.680 --> 0:24:53.920
<v Speaker 1>I was thinking, the only way I could describe this

0:24:54.119 --> 0:24:58.760
<v Speaker 1>is if you were thinking about having a smaller particles

0:24:59.480 --> 0:25:03.280
<v Speaker 1>being put forward, because larger particles are sinking down, so

0:25:03.400 --> 0:25:05.840
<v Speaker 1>instead of being pushed down, they're actually going up. And

0:25:05.880 --> 0:25:07.600
<v Speaker 1>then the more I read about, the more I'm like,

0:25:07.680 --> 0:25:10.760
<v Speaker 1>this is a complete misunderstanding of this, and I cannot

0:25:11.320 --> 0:25:14.240
<v Speaker 1>go with this analogy. And that's what I thought. I

0:25:14.280 --> 0:25:19.120
<v Speaker 1>hope Lauren has got discovered, and luckily she did. Yes,

0:25:19.680 --> 0:25:22.000
<v Speaker 1>I like the physics. The physics were always the interesting

0:25:22.040 --> 0:25:23.919
<v Speaker 1>part to me. I was always terrible at algebra, but

0:25:24.000 --> 0:25:27.879
<v Speaker 1>really good at geometry. See, I love classical physics. Quantum

0:25:27.880 --> 0:25:31.680
<v Speaker 1>physics makes my head hurt. I just that's a fun headache.

0:25:31.720 --> 0:25:34.119
<v Speaker 1>I like that. I like the quantum physics headache. If

0:25:34.240 --> 0:25:36.840
<v Speaker 1>better you than me, what's that terrific quote off? If

0:25:36.840 --> 0:25:39.000
<v Speaker 1>you're not kind of upset by quantum physics, you haven't

0:25:39.040 --> 0:25:42.080
<v Speaker 1>understood it properly. I think all of us haven't understood

0:25:42.080 --> 0:25:44.240
<v Speaker 1>it properly. I think the people who haven't understood it

0:25:44.240 --> 0:25:47.480
<v Speaker 1>probably the most have the biggest headaches. Those are quantum

0:25:47.480 --> 0:25:51.119
<v Speaker 1>physicists anyway. But then I say that as as I

0:25:51.240 --> 0:25:54.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, every quantum physicist interview I've said I've watched

0:25:54.840 --> 0:25:58.040
<v Speaker 1>tends to include a question that's all similar to, but

0:25:58.080 --> 0:26:00.520
<v Speaker 1>do you really understand what it is you're talking about?

0:26:00.520 --> 0:26:04.160
<v Speaker 1>In the quantum physicist almost always says, you know, there's

0:26:04.160 --> 0:26:07.840
<v Speaker 1>a certain level where I don't like there's certain things

0:26:07.840 --> 0:26:10.159
<v Speaker 1>that you just say, all right, this is how it is,

0:26:10.240 --> 0:26:13.359
<v Speaker 1>because that's how it is. But to be able to

0:26:13.400 --> 0:26:17.159
<v Speaker 1>answer why I can't and so it's, you know, one

0:26:17.160 --> 0:26:19.639
<v Speaker 1>of those things you just have to accept and my

0:26:19.680 --> 0:26:22.920
<v Speaker 1>brain starts to melt out of your ears. Yeah, there's

0:26:22.960 --> 0:26:26.399
<v Speaker 1>a lot of screaming and waving of fists inside the

0:26:26.400 --> 0:26:30.520
<v Speaker 1>cranty the Yeah. But so the special being optical conveyor

0:26:30.560 --> 0:26:34.000
<v Speaker 1>technology might be an interesting practical use for it could

0:26:34.000 --> 0:26:37.240
<v Speaker 1>be to test the tensile strength of cells. For example,

0:26:37.359 --> 0:26:40.360
<v Speaker 1>if if a cell has been infected with malaria, it's

0:26:40.440 --> 0:26:42.600
<v Speaker 1>more rigid than a normal blood cell, and so it

0:26:42.600 --> 0:26:48.639
<v Speaker 1>could be super useful in tiny, microscopic medical purposes. Similar

0:26:48.680 --> 0:26:52.439
<v Speaker 1>to another breakthrough that was very recent as of the

0:26:52.480 --> 0:26:56.359
<v Speaker 1>recording of this podcast. We're recording this in early February,

0:26:56.520 --> 0:27:00.240
<v Speaker 1>and there were some publications that we're talking about an

0:27:00.280 --> 0:27:03.680
<v Speaker 1>experiment that had been performed by scientists from Scotland and

0:27:03.720 --> 0:27:08.159
<v Speaker 1>the Czech Republic about using a beam of light with

0:27:08.240 --> 0:27:13.120
<v Speaker 1>a specific geometry to pull particles of polystyrene. And these

0:27:13.480 --> 0:27:17.960
<v Speaker 1>particles are very very small, in fact, beyond microscopic. We're

0:27:17.960 --> 0:27:23.240
<v Speaker 1>talking about nanometers, four nimes, about four d ten nanometers specifically.

0:27:23.240 --> 0:27:25.159
<v Speaker 1>Think most of the particles we've been talking about have

0:27:25.280 --> 0:27:28.040
<v Speaker 1>been on on that scale. Yeah, pretty pretty tiny stuff,

0:27:28.119 --> 0:27:35.040
<v Speaker 1>but nimes and one thousand nanometer particles essentially, think about

0:27:35.760 --> 0:27:40.679
<v Speaker 1>tiny spheres of polystyrene that are only a few hundred

0:27:40.760 --> 0:27:43.720
<v Speaker 1>nimeters in diameter. That's essentially what we're talking about here.

0:27:44.119 --> 0:27:48.399
<v Speaker 1>And they found that by uh polarizing the light in

0:27:48.440 --> 0:27:53.439
<v Speaker 1>a particular way, they could manipulate these particles. And in fact,

0:27:53.760 --> 0:27:56.240
<v Speaker 1>not only could they manipulate the particles, but depending upon

0:27:56.320 --> 0:28:00.680
<v Speaker 1>the way they polarized the light, they could so electively

0:28:01.320 --> 0:28:05.840
<v Speaker 1>manipulate particles of a certain size while not affecting particles

0:28:05.840 --> 0:28:07.840
<v Speaker 1>of another size. Yeah, there's a there's a little video

0:28:07.840 --> 0:28:09.600
<v Speaker 1>of this, by the way, and a press release will

0:28:09.640 --> 0:28:12.720
<v Speaker 1>link it somewhere on our on our tech staff media. Yeah,

0:28:12.720 --> 0:28:14.320
<v Speaker 1>you'll have to take a look at this. It's pretty

0:28:14.359 --> 0:28:16.639
<v Speaker 1>amazing because you think about that that means that you

0:28:16.680 --> 0:28:22.240
<v Speaker 1>will be able to selectively uh grip, sort and move

0:28:22.600 --> 0:28:25.080
<v Speaker 1>right particles, so that way you could you could keep

0:28:25.160 --> 0:28:27.959
<v Speaker 1>some undisturbed while you're while the ones you're interested in,

0:28:28.000 --> 0:28:30.359
<v Speaker 1>those are the ones you can manipulate. And uh and

0:28:30.440 --> 0:28:34.440
<v Speaker 1>that is a huge breakthrough you're talking about just by

0:28:34.440 --> 0:28:37.320
<v Speaker 1>by again changing the nature of the light itself, being

0:28:37.359 --> 0:28:42.800
<v Speaker 1>able to affect very specific sizes of particles, and it

0:28:42.840 --> 0:28:46.320
<v Speaker 1>doesn't really matter what the particle is made out of.

0:28:46.440 --> 0:28:50.280
<v Speaker 1>They were using polystyrene in a liquid solution, So again

0:28:50.320 --> 0:28:52.560
<v Speaker 1>this was another breakthrough, was that this was something that

0:28:52.600 --> 0:28:55.320
<v Speaker 1>could work within a liquid, making it very useful for

0:28:55.440 --> 0:28:58.760
<v Speaker 1>medical purposes. So if you wanted to take a blood

0:28:58.760 --> 0:29:03.200
<v Speaker 1>cell and you needed to move certain particles in that

0:29:03.240 --> 0:29:06.000
<v Speaker 1>blood cell out or off to a side so that

0:29:06.080 --> 0:29:10.960
<v Speaker 1>you could either examine them more closely, or perhaps get

0:29:11.000 --> 0:29:12.560
<v Speaker 1>them out of the way so you can examine something

0:29:12.560 --> 0:29:14.640
<v Speaker 1>else in the blood cell more closely, it would be

0:29:14.640 --> 0:29:18.080
<v Speaker 1>a very useful tool. I one description that I saw

0:29:18.080 --> 0:29:21.200
<v Speaker 1>of this said that uh and and this one in particular,

0:29:21.280 --> 0:29:23.480
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of very intelligent people have said

0:29:23.720 --> 0:29:27.480
<v Speaker 1>very erudite things about all of the rest of these

0:29:27.640 --> 0:29:32.160
<v Speaker 1>forms of tractor beam manipulation, and I read them and

0:29:32.360 --> 0:29:35.120
<v Speaker 1>have said them back to you. This one is so

0:29:35.240 --> 0:29:37.440
<v Speaker 1>new that not that many people who are smarter than

0:29:37.520 --> 0:29:39.560
<v Speaker 1>us have really said that many things about it, and

0:29:39.640 --> 0:29:44.480
<v Speaker 1>so therefore my understanding is tenuous. But one explanation that

0:29:44.520 --> 0:29:46.680
<v Speaker 1>I saw said that they used a mirror to bounce

0:29:46.720 --> 0:29:50.280
<v Speaker 1>the laser beam back across itself, interfering with the head

0:29:50.320 --> 0:29:55.240
<v Speaker 1>on photons and thereby pushing right the The interesting thing

0:29:55.280 --> 0:29:58.680
<v Speaker 1>to me was that it was through that interference that

0:29:58.720 --> 0:30:03.280
<v Speaker 1>creates this pulling. It was not, however, because you you

0:30:03.320 --> 0:30:05.680
<v Speaker 1>hear mirror and you think, oh, well, all they're doing

0:30:06.160 --> 0:30:08.720
<v Speaker 1>is shooting the photons, bouncing it off the mirror, and

0:30:08.720 --> 0:30:11.280
<v Speaker 1>then the photons hit the particle and then push the particle.

0:30:11.320 --> 0:30:13.280
<v Speaker 1>But that's not what's happened. That's not what's happening. It's

0:30:13.320 --> 0:30:17.280
<v Speaker 1>the it's the interaction of the uh, the oncoming beam

0:30:17.360 --> 0:30:21.600
<v Speaker 1>and the reflected beam that create this pulling motion. And that,

0:30:21.640 --> 0:30:24.840
<v Speaker 1>to me is phenomenal because at first I thought, oh, well,

0:30:25.200 --> 0:30:27.160
<v Speaker 1>what they're really doing it is just a mirror. Yeah,

0:30:27.160 --> 0:30:29.440
<v Speaker 1>they're just they're just pushing, they're not pulling. But that's

0:30:29.480 --> 0:30:32.840
<v Speaker 1>not the case. That actually is pulling. Actually, they're The

0:30:32.880 --> 0:30:36.040
<v Speaker 1>really fascinating thing about this is that apparently, under certain conditions,

0:30:36.080 --> 0:30:39.280
<v Speaker 1>the objects held by the beam rearranged themselves into a

0:30:39.320 --> 0:30:43.280
<v Speaker 1>structure that made the pull stronger. That's pretty awesome. I

0:30:43.280 --> 0:30:48.120
<v Speaker 1>mean this, this is so mind blowing to me that this,

0:30:48.120 --> 0:30:51.200
<v Speaker 1>this world on the nanoscale is every time I read

0:30:51.240 --> 0:30:56.000
<v Speaker 1>anything about it, it amazes me. It's like, you know,

0:30:56.040 --> 0:30:59.320
<v Speaker 1>the two areas I find the most interesting when it

0:30:59.360 --> 0:31:05.200
<v Speaker 1>comes to exploration are outer space and nanospace because there

0:31:05.200 --> 0:31:08.120
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of parallels, I mean, weird parallels between

0:31:08.160 --> 0:31:11.560
<v Speaker 1>outer space and nanospace fractals. Fractals say that that's a

0:31:11.760 --> 0:31:14.320
<v Speaker 1>that is a known quantity. That just makes me think

0:31:14.320 --> 0:31:18.040
<v Speaker 1>of the Jonathan Coulton song Mandel Brought Set, which is awesome.

0:31:18.080 --> 0:31:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Have you heard that? I do not believe I have

0:31:19.880 --> 0:31:22.040
<v Speaker 1>what I guess what we're doing. After the podcast is over,

0:31:22.320 --> 0:31:26.080
<v Speaker 1>you get to hear a song. Alright, So uh we

0:31:26.280 --> 0:31:28.520
<v Speaker 1>we we alluded to the fact that this is stuff

0:31:28.560 --> 0:31:31.640
<v Speaker 1>that works on a microscopic scale and would not translate

0:31:31.680 --> 0:31:34.800
<v Speaker 1>to macroscopic Yes, and here's the reason why. Yeah, the

0:31:34.840 --> 0:31:36.800
<v Speaker 1>reason why is that all of all of this work

0:31:36.840 --> 0:31:41.120
<v Speaker 1>with lasers. Lasers of course, um can burn stuff and

0:31:41.160 --> 0:31:44.680
<v Speaker 1>if you had a big enough laser to move you know,

0:31:44.840 --> 0:31:48.520
<v Speaker 1>the one of the physicists I think mentioned a football.

0:31:48.840 --> 0:31:50.840
<v Speaker 1>I assume that they were meaning a soccer ball because

0:31:50.840 --> 0:31:54.440
<v Speaker 1>they were from Scotland and that was that was Thomas Sismar.

0:31:54.760 --> 0:31:58.640
<v Speaker 1>There you go, um, and it would fry a long

0:31:58.720 --> 0:32:01.080
<v Speaker 1>time before you would move that soccer ball. Yeah. In

0:32:01.280 --> 0:32:03.320
<v Speaker 1>other words, the laser would have to be of such

0:32:03.360 --> 0:32:06.520
<v Speaker 1>an intensity and size as to destroy whatever it was

0:32:06.600 --> 0:32:08.880
<v Speaker 1>you were trying to move. So it might move, but

0:32:08.960 --> 0:32:12.400
<v Speaker 1>only because someone didn't want it to burn down everything else, right,

0:32:12.880 --> 0:32:15.000
<v Speaker 1>it would be moved by someone else who's saying, why

0:32:15.040 --> 0:32:17.200
<v Speaker 1>do you have this flaming soccer ball in the middle

0:32:17.200 --> 0:32:20.760
<v Speaker 1>of the field. Yeah, that's the that's a problem obviously.

0:32:20.800 --> 0:32:23.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's it's a it's a non trivial problem,

0:32:23.160 --> 0:32:25.040
<v Speaker 1>and I mean, I know it's a non trivial problem,

0:32:25.080 --> 0:32:27.120
<v Speaker 1>and it sounds like I'm being silly, but no, it's

0:32:27.160 --> 0:32:29.960
<v Speaker 1>non trivial, and that as far as we are able

0:32:30.000 --> 0:32:33.160
<v Speaker 1>to determine, there's no way to get around that using

0:32:33.200 --> 0:32:38.480
<v Speaker 1>this particular implementation of the tractor beam idea. So this

0:32:38.480 --> 0:32:42.719
<v Speaker 1>would strictly be on the nano and micro scale and

0:32:42.800 --> 0:32:45.720
<v Speaker 1>never get beyond that. That does not mean that we

0:32:45.800 --> 0:32:48.880
<v Speaker 1>won't find some other way of creating a tractor beam.

0:32:48.920 --> 0:32:52.680
<v Speaker 1>We very well made, but it's not going to be

0:32:52.800 --> 0:32:56.680
<v Speaker 1>using these particular methods because obviously we would end up

0:32:56.720 --> 0:32:59.680
<v Speaker 1>destroying whatever it was we were trying to manipulate. So

0:32:59.800 --> 0:33:01.440
<v Speaker 1>we hope, we hope that we will see some of

0:33:01.440 --> 0:33:04.440
<v Speaker 1>that in the future. Yeah, it's a really exciting area

0:33:04.440 --> 0:33:08.040
<v Speaker 1>of development. And uh, any of you who are interested

0:33:08.040 --> 0:33:09.880
<v Speaker 1>in this sort of stuff, there are a lot of

0:33:09.880 --> 0:33:12.680
<v Speaker 1>different articles that are available out there, including articles that

0:33:12.720 --> 0:33:15.160
<v Speaker 1>have been published by these scientists. So if you are

0:33:15.280 --> 0:33:18.120
<v Speaker 1>of a scientific mind and you want to learn more,

0:33:18.760 --> 0:33:21.840
<v Speaker 1>there are lots of opportunities to learn about it online.

0:33:21.960 --> 0:33:23.760
<v Speaker 1>And well we'll we'll link to some of those on

0:33:23.800 --> 0:33:27.560
<v Speaker 1>our various social media outlets since you can get a

0:33:27.640 --> 0:33:29.080
<v Speaker 1>chance to take a look at it. Because it really

0:33:29.120 --> 0:33:33.120
<v Speaker 1>is fascinating stuff. And uh, and we love tackling these

0:33:33.120 --> 0:33:37.320
<v Speaker 1>these uh, these sort of topics. They're very challenging, and

0:33:37.680 --> 0:33:39.600
<v Speaker 1>challenge is a good thing. I mean, if you if

0:33:39.600 --> 0:33:41.800
<v Speaker 1>we just sit there and talk about, hey I like

0:33:41.920 --> 0:33:45.040
<v Speaker 1>video games. Hey I also like video games, that it's

0:33:45.040 --> 0:33:47.320
<v Speaker 1>boring for everybody. I mean We know you guys would

0:33:47.320 --> 0:33:50.480
<v Speaker 1>get tired of that too. So if you have specific

0:33:50.520 --> 0:33:52.760
<v Speaker 1>topics that you think you know. I know this would

0:33:52.800 --> 0:33:54.680
<v Speaker 1>be a tall order, but I really want to hear

0:33:54.720 --> 0:33:57.000
<v Speaker 1>more about it, send it our way. Do you want

0:33:57.000 --> 0:34:00.400
<v Speaker 1>to know about invisibility cloaks, Let us know. We will

0:34:00.440 --> 0:34:02.640
<v Speaker 1>look into it and we will explain them to you.

0:34:03.960 --> 0:34:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Maybe not even using Harry Potter as a reference. That's unlikely.

0:34:08.160 --> 0:34:11.080
<v Speaker 1>That's a tall order. But but if you have any requests,

0:34:11.160 --> 0:34:13.440
<v Speaker 1>send them our way. There are multiple ways to get

0:34:13.480 --> 0:34:15.920
<v Speaker 1>in touch with us. One of them is email and

0:34:15.920 --> 0:34:20.440
<v Speaker 1>our email addresses tech stuff at Discovery dot com, or

0:34:20.560 --> 0:34:22.959
<v Speaker 1>let us know on Facebook or Twitter. You can find

0:34:23.040 --> 0:34:25.920
<v Speaker 1>us at both those locations with the handle text stuff

0:34:26.280 --> 0:34:28.920
<v Speaker 1>H s W and Lauren and I will talk to

0:34:28.920 --> 0:34:33.160
<v Speaker 1>you again really soon for more on this and thousands

0:34:33.160 --> 0:34:39.800
<v Speaker 1>of other topics. Is it hastaff works dot com