WEBVTT - Before Sunrise/Before Sunset, Nostalghia (Tarkovsky #5)

0:00:03.880 --> 0:00:05.720
<v Speaker 1>What kind of a show you guys.

0:00:05.440 --> 0:00:06.360
<v Speaker 2>Putting on here today?

0:00:06.480 --> 0:00:08.879
<v Speaker 3>You're not interested in armed now? No, Look, we're going

0:00:08.920 --> 0:00:09.399
<v Speaker 3>to do this thing.

0:00:09.400 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 4>We're going to have a.

0:00:10.039 --> 0:00:15.880
<v Speaker 5>Conversation from Chicago. This is film Spotting. I'm Adam Kempinar

0:00:16.120 --> 0:00:17.200
<v Speaker 5>and I'm Josh Larson.

0:00:17.360 --> 0:00:18.200
<v Speaker 3>So listen, here's the deal.

0:00:18.239 --> 0:00:18.880
<v Speaker 2>This is what we should do.

0:00:18.880 --> 0:00:20.200
<v Speaker 6>You should get off the train with me here in

0:00:20.280 --> 0:00:21.360
<v Speaker 6>Vienna and come check out the town.

0:00:21.640 --> 0:00:22.840
<v Speaker 2>What come on, it'll be fine.

0:00:22.960 --> 0:00:26.400
<v Speaker 7>Thirty years ago, Jesse met Selene on the train to Vienna,

0:00:26.600 --> 0:00:28.080
<v Speaker 7>and the rest is movie history.

0:00:28.320 --> 0:00:30.159
<v Speaker 5>This week, we spend a night and a day with

0:00:30.200 --> 0:00:33.879
<v Speaker 5>Ethan Hawks Jesse and Julie Delpy Selene as we revisit

0:00:33.960 --> 0:00:36.760
<v Speaker 5>both nineteen ninety five's Before Sunrise in two thousand and

0:00:36.800 --> 0:00:38.600
<v Speaker 5>fours Before Sunset.

0:00:38.280 --> 0:00:42.960
<v Speaker 7>And our Andre Tarkowski marathon concludes with nineteen eighty three's Nostalgia.

0:00:43.440 --> 0:00:44.120
<v Speaker 3>It's all ahead.

0:00:44.200 --> 0:00:46.000
<v Speaker 5>You're going to miss that plane, Josh.

0:00:46.200 --> 0:00:47.960
<v Speaker 7>I don't say that I actually have a plan to

0:00:48.000 --> 0:00:49.559
<v Speaker 7>catch on film spotting.

0:00:49.920 --> 0:00:54.800
<v Speaker 8>Just you man.

0:00:58.120 --> 0:01:01.120
<v Speaker 5>Welcome to film Spotting. It's a nice bit of coincidence

0:01:01.160 --> 0:01:04.919
<v Speaker 5>spotting this week, Josh, which we may get into more later.

0:01:05.240 --> 0:01:09.840
<v Speaker 5>We're closing out our Andre Tarkovsky Marathon with Nostalgia, and

0:01:09.959 --> 0:01:13.440
<v Speaker 5>we're embarking on a little bit of a nostalgia fest

0:01:13.640 --> 0:01:17.640
<v Speaker 5>ourselves by revisiting two films from our past. Two films

0:01:17.680 --> 0:01:22.880
<v Speaker 5>we love Richard Linklater's Before Sunrise and Before Sunset.

0:01:22.720 --> 0:01:25.399
<v Speaker 7>And Nostalgia for our film spotted Fest, which is only

0:01:25.440 --> 0:01:26.160
<v Speaker 7>a few months old.

0:01:26.200 --> 0:01:29.680
<v Speaker 5>That's right, exactly. Back in March, we closed the first

0:01:29.720 --> 0:01:32.920
<v Speaker 5>ever film Spotting Fest with a thirtieth anniversary screening of

0:01:32.959 --> 0:01:36.119
<v Speaker 5>Before Sunrise. That was that the Music Box in Chicago,

0:01:36.200 --> 0:01:37.480
<v Speaker 5>and that was pretty magically.

0:01:37.480 --> 0:01:37.800
<v Speaker 3>You're right.

0:01:37.880 --> 0:01:41.640
<v Speaker 5>I'm already reminiscing about that day. On a Sunday back

0:01:41.680 --> 0:01:44.399
<v Speaker 5>in March after the movie, critic Scott Tobias from the

0:01:44.440 --> 0:01:47.280
<v Speaker 5>Next Picture Show and The Reveal joined us along with

0:01:47.319 --> 0:01:49.920
<v Speaker 5>our producer Sam Van Halgren to talk about the film.

0:01:49.960 --> 0:01:52.760
<v Speaker 5>We'll share that conversation later in the show, along with

0:01:52.920 --> 0:01:56.960
<v Speaker 5>the conclusion of our Tarkovski Marathon. All that and Massacre Theater.

0:01:57.280 --> 0:01:59.840
<v Speaker 7>First, we're going to mess with the chronology a bit here.

0:02:00.000 --> 0:02:02.480
<v Speaker 7>I don't think link Later would mind. He has a

0:02:02.480 --> 0:02:07.000
<v Speaker 7>habit of doing that himself. Before Sunset it celebrated its

0:02:07.040 --> 0:02:11.560
<v Speaker 7>twentieth anniversary last year and we're revisiting it now as

0:02:11.600 --> 0:02:14.359
<v Speaker 7>part of our Pantheon project. This is our effort to

0:02:14.440 --> 0:02:18.440
<v Speaker 7>review every film in the film spotting Pantheon. And I

0:02:18.560 --> 0:02:22.880
<v Speaker 7>like how Sam is phrasing this here eccentricly assembled movie.

0:02:22.600 --> 0:02:25.000
<v Speaker 3>Hall of Fame. I think that's accurate.

0:02:24.600 --> 0:02:27.600
<v Speaker 7>And sounds sounds kind of nice. Before Sunset, along with

0:02:27.639 --> 0:02:30.600
<v Speaker 7>the other two films in the Before trilogy, was added

0:02:30.600 --> 0:02:32.640
<v Speaker 7>to the Pantheon back in twenty sixteen. That's when we

0:02:32.680 --> 0:02:36.560
<v Speaker 7>did our Top five Richard Linkletter scenes. Three of your

0:02:36.680 --> 0:02:39.919
<v Speaker 7>top five, Adam were from the Before trilogy, including two

0:02:40.320 --> 0:02:44.680
<v Speaker 7>from Sunset. I think I had two picks from this

0:02:44.800 --> 0:02:47.880
<v Speaker 7>trilogy in my top five. Before Sunset came to theaters

0:02:47.960 --> 0:02:51.799
<v Speaker 7>in June two thousand and four, nine years after its predecessor.

0:02:52.080 --> 0:02:53.680
<v Speaker 7>The movie went on to become one of the best

0:02:53.760 --> 0:02:56.480
<v Speaker 7>reviewed of the year. Unlike the first film, which was

0:02:56.520 --> 0:03:00.040
<v Speaker 7>written by Linklater and Kim Krizan, Sunset is credit I

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:03.920
<v Speaker 7>did to stars Hawk and Delpy along with Linklater. And

0:03:03.960 --> 0:03:05.679
<v Speaker 7>although we may think of the first two films in

0:03:05.720 --> 0:03:09.000
<v Speaker 7>the trilogy as having similar structures, there's a couple walking

0:03:09.040 --> 0:03:11.840
<v Speaker 7>and talking over a single day or a night. In

0:03:11.840 --> 0:03:14.840
<v Speaker 7>the case of Before, sunrise before sunset is meant to

0:03:14.840 --> 0:03:17.360
<v Speaker 7>take place more or less in real time, basically the

0:03:17.440 --> 0:03:20.680
<v Speaker 7>ninety or so minutes before Hawk's Jesse, now married and

0:03:20.720 --> 0:03:24.600
<v Speaker 7>a successful author, is scheduled to catch his plane back

0:03:24.639 --> 0:03:25.680
<v Speaker 7>home from Paris.

0:03:26.080 --> 0:03:30.200
<v Speaker 3>Let's hear a clip. Look, I'm just so happy, all

0:03:30.320 --> 0:03:33.200
<v Speaker 3>right to be with you, I am. I'm so glad

0:03:33.200 --> 0:03:34.200
<v Speaker 3>you didn't forget about me.

0:03:35.120 --> 0:03:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Okay, No, I didn't, and it pisces me off. Okay,

0:03:38.720 --> 0:03:42.360
<v Speaker 1>you come here to Paris all romantic and married.

0:03:42.480 --> 0:03:43.440
<v Speaker 3>Getting screw you.

0:03:44.720 --> 0:03:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Don't get me wrong.

0:03:45.600 --> 0:03:47.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm not trying to get you or anything.

0:03:47.080 --> 0:03:48.360
<v Speaker 9>I mean, all I need.

0:03:48.200 --> 0:03:49.240
<v Speaker 8>Is a married man.

0:03:50.360 --> 0:03:51.880
<v Speaker 1>And there's been so much water under the bridge.

0:03:51.880 --> 0:03:53.240
<v Speaker 9>It's not even about you anymore.

0:03:53.240 --> 0:03:55.080
<v Speaker 1>It's at that time, that moment in time that is

0:03:55.120 --> 0:03:55.680
<v Speaker 1>forever gone.

0:03:55.720 --> 0:03:57.480
<v Speaker 10>I don't know you say on that, but you didn't

0:03:57.480 --> 0:04:01.400
<v Speaker 10>even remember having sex, so sorry remembered.

0:04:03.760 --> 0:04:04.160
<v Speaker 8>He did?

0:04:04.560 --> 0:04:07.560
<v Speaker 11>Yes, women pretend things like that.

0:04:07.800 --> 0:04:09.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know they do.

0:04:09.800 --> 0:04:11.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, what was I supposed to say that?

0:04:11.440 --> 0:04:14.600
<v Speaker 4>I remember the wine in the park and us looking

0:04:14.640 --> 0:04:17.120
<v Speaker 4>at the stars fading away as the sun came up.

0:04:17.640 --> 0:04:19.000
<v Speaker 3>We had sex twice, you.

0:04:19.080 --> 0:04:23.240
<v Speaker 5>Idiot, even though I was in full on pretentious film

0:04:23.279 --> 0:04:26.680
<v Speaker 5>guy mode in nineteen ninety five, or aspired to be anyway,

0:04:27.000 --> 0:04:30.040
<v Speaker 5>I couldn't claim to be a Richard linklater fan. I'm

0:04:30.040 --> 0:04:31.960
<v Speaker 5>not one hundred percent sure I knew his name at

0:04:32.000 --> 0:04:34.960
<v Speaker 5>that point. Growing up in Iowa, I definitely wouldn't have

0:04:34.960 --> 0:04:37.400
<v Speaker 5>seen Slacker yet. And even though I surely had seen

0:04:37.480 --> 0:04:40.080
<v Speaker 5>Days and Confused, I didn't know enough to know it

0:04:40.120 --> 0:04:44.040
<v Speaker 5>was great. I probably plucked the Before Sunrise VHS case

0:04:44.040 --> 0:04:46.400
<v Speaker 5>off the shelf of my local video store on the

0:04:46.400 --> 0:04:49.520
<v Speaker 5>strength of that sexy cover Ethan Hawk and Julie Delpy

0:04:49.560 --> 0:04:53.800
<v Speaker 5>facing each other, arms intertwined, and Hawk, who I remembered

0:04:53.800 --> 0:04:57.279
<v Speaker 5>from Explorers, loved in Dead Poet Society and may have

0:04:57.320 --> 0:04:59.560
<v Speaker 5>even enjoyed in Waterland when I was going through my

0:04:59.640 --> 0:05:03.680
<v Speaker 5>Jeremy Irons phase. Yes, dear listeners, I swooned over it.

0:05:04.200 --> 0:05:06.400
<v Speaker 5>In this age of endless IP, it's hard to imagine

0:05:06.400 --> 0:05:09.520
<v Speaker 5>anymore getting over protective about movies and the sanctity of

0:05:09.560 --> 0:05:12.480
<v Speaker 5>certain characters and stories. But when I heard that Link

0:05:12.560 --> 0:05:16.000
<v Speaker 5>later planned to make a sequel, I was shaken. On

0:05:16.000 --> 0:05:18.240
<v Speaker 5>one hand, by this point, I did know enough to

0:05:18.279 --> 0:05:20.799
<v Speaker 5>know that Days and Confused was great, and yeah, Before

0:05:20.800 --> 0:05:24.000
<v Speaker 5>Sunrise was brilliant and waking life blew my mind, so

0:05:24.120 --> 0:05:26.400
<v Speaker 5>Linklater had earned the credibility to go back to that

0:05:26.520 --> 0:05:30.279
<v Speaker 5>artistic well. Also, a major part of Before Sunrise's brilliance

0:05:30.320 --> 0:05:32.640
<v Speaker 5>is how much you enjoy just hanging out with Jesse

0:05:32.760 --> 0:05:35.919
<v Speaker 5>and Selene. Of course, I'll take any opportunity to spend

0:05:35.920 --> 0:05:39.760
<v Speaker 5>more time with them. On the other hand, Before Sunrise

0:05:40.320 --> 0:05:45.680
<v Speaker 5>was perfect, with an ending that was perfect. Why would

0:05:45.720 --> 0:05:50.039
<v Speaker 5>link Later risk ruining perfection? All my fellow gen xers

0:05:50.080 --> 0:05:52.719
<v Speaker 5>who were worried about George Lucas destroying their childhoods a

0:05:52.720 --> 0:05:56.080
<v Speaker 5>few years prior, well, Linklater was possibly about to destroy

0:05:56.160 --> 0:06:00.000
<v Speaker 5>this exer's young adulthood. The filmmaker frames the dilemma pretty

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:03.640
<v Speaker 5>well himself and before Sunset in the opening sequence, at

0:06:03.640 --> 0:06:06.839
<v Speaker 5>the bookstore, Jesse, who has written about his personal experience

0:06:06.880 --> 0:06:10.080
<v Speaker 5>with Selene, just as link Later had transformed his personal

0:06:10.120 --> 0:06:12.280
<v Speaker 5>experience with a woman he met on a train traveling

0:06:12.279 --> 0:06:16.000
<v Speaker 5>through Europe, naturally gets asked the big question, do the

0:06:16.000 --> 0:06:18.880
<v Speaker 5>two characters get back together again in six months like

0:06:18.880 --> 0:06:23.279
<v Speaker 5>they promised each other, to which Jesse evasively but eloquently replies,

0:06:23.480 --> 0:06:26.240
<v Speaker 5>it's a good test, right if you're a romantic or

0:06:26.279 --> 0:06:29.839
<v Speaker 5>a cynic. The implication seems clear enough. If you believe

0:06:29.839 --> 0:06:32.000
<v Speaker 5>they met again in Vienna in six months, then you're

0:06:32.040 --> 0:06:34.960
<v Speaker 5>a romantic. If you believe they didn't meet, then you're

0:06:35.000 --> 0:06:39.360
<v Speaker 5>a cynic. I was sure they met again in six months,

0:06:39.920 --> 0:06:42.359
<v Speaker 5>but I was also sure that I was perfectly content

0:06:42.640 --> 0:06:45.560
<v Speaker 5>to let Jesse and Selene live on forever. In my imagination,

0:06:46.000 --> 0:06:49.159
<v Speaker 5>the possibility of that affair to remember future meetup was

0:06:49.200 --> 0:06:53.440
<v Speaker 5>satisfying enough, or so I thought, Josh, how did you

0:06:53.520 --> 0:06:56.919
<v Speaker 5>fare on the before test? Are you a romantic or

0:06:56.960 --> 0:06:59.719
<v Speaker 5>a cynic? And how grateful are you that Link Later

0:07:00.400 --> 0:07:02.920
<v Speaker 5>and Delpy granted us more time with these two.

0:07:04.120 --> 0:07:06.440
<v Speaker 7>Here's my level of cynicism, as best as I can

0:07:06.520 --> 0:07:10.800
<v Speaker 7>recall seeing this in two thousand and four is I

0:07:10.880 --> 0:07:15.520
<v Speaker 7>was less thinking about what I wanted, but thinking about

0:07:15.880 --> 0:07:18.360
<v Speaker 7>what is link later? What is the answer link later

0:07:18.480 --> 0:07:20.400
<v Speaker 7>is going to give in this movie that I'm currently

0:07:20.440 --> 0:07:22.840
<v Speaker 7>watching that's going to be satisfying. I was too much

0:07:22.840 --> 0:07:25.720
<v Speaker 7>in my own head and maybe not lost enough in

0:07:26.120 --> 0:07:30.200
<v Speaker 7>the characters' heads, despite having loved Before Sunrise. I think

0:07:30.200 --> 0:07:33.960
<v Speaker 7>at the time I was probably, you know, folding my

0:07:34.080 --> 0:07:36.880
<v Speaker 7>arms a little bit about the sequel question you know,

0:07:36.960 --> 0:07:39.960
<v Speaker 7>working at that point as as a film critic, and

0:07:40.960 --> 0:07:43.200
<v Speaker 7>also you know, just wondering why is Link Later someone

0:07:43.240 --> 0:07:46.679
<v Speaker 7>like Linklater doing this. But I do think the movie

0:07:46.760 --> 0:07:50.320
<v Speaker 7>must have won me over pretty quickly, because the lead

0:07:50.400 --> 0:07:53.800
<v Speaker 7>to my eventual review was when talk is an aphrodisiac

0:07:54.160 --> 0:07:57.920
<v Speaker 7>who wants the conversation to stop. So whatever skepticism I

0:07:58.000 --> 0:08:04.880
<v Speaker 7>had the movie overcame for sure. I think I still

0:08:04.880 --> 0:08:07.280
<v Speaker 7>probably did not appreciate it as much as I should

0:08:07.320 --> 0:08:10.640
<v Speaker 7>have at the time, and that's what made this revisit

0:08:10.720 --> 0:08:14.160
<v Speaker 7>so wonderful, and the knowledge that there's still a before Midnight,

0:08:14.200 --> 0:08:17.840
<v Speaker 7>which now I want to revisit again and likely discover

0:08:17.920 --> 0:08:20.240
<v Speaker 7>that I underestimated that one, even though I liked it,

0:08:20.280 --> 0:08:24.640
<v Speaker 7>but far less than these two installments. The first two installments. Yeah,

0:08:24.680 --> 0:08:28.920
<v Speaker 7>they pull off something of a miracle here, and they

0:08:29.000 --> 0:08:34.960
<v Speaker 7>do it so lightly, so seemingly effortlessly. Yet when you

0:08:35.720 --> 0:08:39.640
<v Speaker 7>watch this conversation unfolding over these ninety minutes closely, you

0:08:39.760 --> 0:08:44.560
<v Speaker 7>realize how intricate and strategic it is, and how it

0:08:44.679 --> 0:08:49.320
<v Speaker 7>shifts and ebbs and flows in ways that I imagine

0:08:49.320 --> 0:08:52.200
<v Speaker 7>improvisation was involved. But I think there had to be

0:08:52.400 --> 0:08:56.360
<v Speaker 7>long discussions among the three of them about the superstructure

0:08:56.840 --> 0:09:01.200
<v Speaker 7>and the journey that they want these characters to go

0:09:01.280 --> 0:09:05.800
<v Speaker 7>on over the course of before sunset, and then just

0:09:05.920 --> 0:09:08.920
<v Speaker 7>laying out how they're going to shift from one step

0:09:08.960 --> 0:09:11.720
<v Speaker 7>to the other, and then maybe allowing the improvisation to

0:09:11.760 --> 0:09:14.240
<v Speaker 7>get them there. But this is something of a miracle

0:09:14.360 --> 0:09:17.600
<v Speaker 7>in the way they make it flow so naturally, rooted

0:09:17.640 --> 0:09:20.880
<v Speaker 7>in the same characters we know so intimately, and achieve

0:09:21.040 --> 0:09:27.040
<v Speaker 7>something so monumental and complete and cohesive coming down to

0:09:27.080 --> 0:09:28.720
<v Speaker 7>this perfect ending as well.

0:09:28.960 --> 0:09:30.760
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, that was that was my.

0:09:30.800 --> 0:09:35.800
<v Speaker 7>Memory of my first encounter with it, and even appreciating

0:09:35.800 --> 0:09:38.600
<v Speaker 7>it at the time, now realizing I underestimated it at

0:09:38.600 --> 0:09:38.960
<v Speaker 7>the time.

0:09:39.280 --> 0:09:41.800
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, how about that not only pulling off the miracle

0:09:42.000 --> 0:09:46.120
<v Speaker 5>of making another masterpiece, and I think it is after

0:09:46.600 --> 0:09:49.680
<v Speaker 5>making one with the first film, but another perfect ending,

0:09:49.760 --> 0:09:51.560
<v Speaker 5>which is what happens here.

0:09:51.360 --> 0:09:53.520
<v Speaker 7>Even a better ending, maybe even a better ending.

0:09:53.640 --> 0:09:57.320
<v Speaker 5>And I realized this time too, it's the exception to

0:09:57.360 --> 0:10:00.360
<v Speaker 5>the rule of sequels, which is and I'd forg this.

0:10:00.360 --> 0:10:02.440
<v Speaker 5>I hadn't seen this film, I think since twenty thirteen,

0:10:02.480 --> 0:10:04.520
<v Speaker 5>that's at least the last time I logged it. That

0:10:04.600 --> 0:10:08.720
<v Speaker 5>was in preparation for before Midnight. I had forgotten that

0:10:08.840 --> 0:10:12.400
<v Speaker 5>early on in the film we see flashbacks, we see

0:10:12.480 --> 0:10:14.800
<v Speaker 5>cuts back to the first film, and that is a

0:10:15.040 --> 0:10:18.800
<v Speaker 5>dead giveaway with sequels that if they're cutting back to

0:10:18.800 --> 0:10:22.160
<v Speaker 5>footage from the first film, then you know it's a disaster.

0:10:21.920 --> 0:10:24.720
<v Speaker 7>Let me tell you. After having just come out of

0:10:24.920 --> 0:10:27.880
<v Speaker 7>Final Reckoning a few days before, to be reminded that

0:10:27.960 --> 0:10:30.400
<v Speaker 7>this was an element in before Sunset, I was like, oh,

0:10:30.440 --> 0:10:34.880
<v Speaker 7>boy or boy, yeah, but so lenage to even redeem that, I.

0:10:34.840 --> 0:10:38.839
<v Speaker 5>Know, link later again just proving all those conventions wrong.

0:10:39.040 --> 0:10:42.760
<v Speaker 5>But it really isn't by accident. It is all in

0:10:43.080 --> 0:10:46.000
<v Speaker 5>the structure. And can I just say I love that

0:10:46.080 --> 0:10:49.840
<v Speaker 5>there's a moment and I didn't clock where it exactly happens,

0:10:49.840 --> 0:10:53.360
<v Speaker 5>but maybe it's about twenty minutes in on their walk

0:10:53.400 --> 0:10:56.200
<v Speaker 5>they have not hit I think it's still before they

0:10:56.360 --> 0:11:00.640
<v Speaker 5>finally hit the cafe that that Selene is ragging Jesse

0:11:00.720 --> 0:11:03.040
<v Speaker 5>to where they're going to sit down and talk. After

0:11:03.040 --> 0:11:07.199
<v Speaker 5>they've left the bookstore and they're talking, and finally Jesse

0:11:07.360 --> 0:11:09.880
<v Speaker 5>just stops and says, you know, this is surreal. This

0:11:10.000 --> 0:11:12.880
<v Speaker 5>is surreal that we're talking after all this time. And

0:11:12.960 --> 0:11:16.600
<v Speaker 5>I love that the movie takes that beat, because for

0:11:16.720 --> 0:11:20.120
<v Speaker 5>every one of us who have waited nine years to

0:11:20.200 --> 0:11:23.640
<v Speaker 5>see these characters get back together, Surreal's the only way

0:11:23.720 --> 0:11:26.880
<v Speaker 5>to describe it. We're feeling the same way those characters

0:11:26.880 --> 0:11:29.400
<v Speaker 5>are right to see them back together having these kinds

0:11:29.440 --> 0:11:30.199
<v Speaker 5>of conversations.

0:11:30.440 --> 0:11:35.240
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, and confronting that is not just a meta element

0:11:35.559 --> 0:11:40.559
<v Speaker 7>either reverberating the audience's desires. It's also how that conversation

0:11:40.720 --> 0:11:43.520
<v Speaker 7>had to go, because this was not Jesse and Celine

0:11:43.760 --> 0:11:47.520
<v Speaker 7>until they get to the point of brutal honesty, dropping

0:11:47.559 --> 0:11:51.800
<v Speaker 7>off facads and just going at it. And this is

0:11:51.840 --> 0:11:55.040
<v Speaker 7>another thing where watching this again and I'm looking up

0:11:55.040 --> 0:11:56.720
<v Speaker 7>as you were talking, and I think I did revisit

0:11:56.800 --> 0:11:58.839
<v Speaker 7>it for that list as well. Last time was about

0:11:58.880 --> 0:12:01.000
<v Speaker 7>a little over ten years ago, but I had forgotten this.

0:12:03.120 --> 0:12:05.280
<v Speaker 7>It starts a little shaky here for me at least,

0:12:05.360 --> 0:12:07.120
<v Speaker 7>and it's a rough start maybe for any of us

0:12:07.120 --> 0:12:10.559
<v Speaker 7>who thought Jesse was a bit pretentious in Before Sunrise,

0:12:10.640 --> 0:12:14.920
<v Speaker 7>because we open just on him people fawning over him

0:12:14.920 --> 0:12:18.240
<v Speaker 7>at his book signing as he waxes philosophical and I'm thinking,

0:12:18.320 --> 0:12:21.640
<v Speaker 7>oh boy, this is like, this is like the worst

0:12:22.040 --> 0:12:23.800
<v Speaker 7>of Jesse, and we're leading.

0:12:23.559 --> 0:12:25.439
<v Speaker 3>With this but it's all a setup.

0:12:25.520 --> 0:12:29.959
<v Speaker 7>It's all a setup, I believe, because it's making us

0:12:30.320 --> 0:12:33.920
<v Speaker 7>realize that when Selene shows up, we see how integral

0:12:34.360 --> 0:12:38.000
<v Speaker 7>she is to who he is, and that this is

0:12:38.040 --> 0:12:41.120
<v Speaker 7>the magic of these movies. It's who they are together

0:12:41.920 --> 0:12:45.559
<v Speaker 7>that is what matters. What is what these films are about.

0:12:45.600 --> 0:12:49.680
<v Speaker 7>It's that chemical space between them. It's not about either individual.

0:12:49.760 --> 0:12:52.559
<v Speaker 7>She You know, she starts to she's nice about his

0:12:53.000 --> 0:12:55.280
<v Speaker 7>book release and everything, but also starts to call him

0:12:55.320 --> 0:12:59.040
<v Speaker 7>out on his BS, but she also appreciates the dreamer

0:12:59.120 --> 0:13:02.000
<v Speaker 7>who's behind the b right. She brings out the best

0:13:02.040 --> 0:13:05.600
<v Speaker 7>in him, he brings out the best in her. He

0:13:05.640 --> 0:13:09.600
<v Speaker 7>calls her on some of her bs. And then you see,

0:13:09.679 --> 0:13:12.080
<v Speaker 7>here's the other element. The way he looks at her

0:13:12.880 --> 0:13:16.120
<v Speaker 7>gets us to fall back in love with him. So

0:13:16.240 --> 0:13:18.920
<v Speaker 7>I really think that link later is setting us up

0:13:19.240 --> 0:13:22.680
<v Speaker 7>by shoving Jesse in our face in the beginning.

0:13:23.280 --> 0:13:24.760
<v Speaker 3>And maybe you.

0:13:24.720 --> 0:13:27.760
<v Speaker 7>Know, some people are more positive on him than others,

0:13:27.760 --> 0:13:29.200
<v Speaker 7>and maybe it's not an issue for them, but at

0:13:29.280 --> 0:13:31.840
<v Speaker 7>least for me, kind of setting me up for not

0:13:32.440 --> 0:13:34.480
<v Speaker 7>and then reminding me of what the magic of these

0:13:34.480 --> 0:13:37.120
<v Speaker 7>movies are about. And it's that honesty that you were

0:13:37.120 --> 0:13:40.520
<v Speaker 7>getting to Adam when they their connection reignites when they

0:13:40.559 --> 0:13:43.880
<v Speaker 7>get to the question of if either one of them

0:13:43.920 --> 0:13:46.520
<v Speaker 7>went to the meeting spot. Right, these who have never

0:13:46.559 --> 0:13:51.520
<v Speaker 7>been about niceties or pleasantries. It's about honesty. And yet

0:13:51.800 --> 0:13:53.480
<v Speaker 7>here's where I'm talking about the ebbs and flows and

0:13:53.520 --> 0:13:56.640
<v Speaker 7>the rhythms. So brilliant to have that moment come early

0:13:56.679 --> 0:14:00.560
<v Speaker 7>on after the pleasantries. But then brilliant also picked them

0:14:00.600 --> 0:14:02.880
<v Speaker 7>backing their way into it, right with him saying he

0:14:02.920 --> 0:14:05.880
<v Speaker 7>did show up, then confessing you know when she says

0:14:06.000 --> 0:14:08.679
<v Speaker 7>she didn't, Oh, no, he didn't either, and then admitting

0:14:08.720 --> 0:14:10.839
<v Speaker 7>he did. Think of the mini drama.

0:14:10.920 --> 0:14:13.200
<v Speaker 3>Over that to get to that truth.

0:14:13.240 --> 0:14:16.040
<v Speaker 7>Because until they get to that truth, they're not Jesse

0:14:16.120 --> 0:14:18.400
<v Speaker 7>and Celine. Yet that's when they become they are.

0:14:18.480 --> 0:14:20.600
<v Speaker 5>No, that's when the movie really takes off. With ever that,

0:14:20.760 --> 0:14:23.200
<v Speaker 5>let me take a few things you said, and I'm

0:14:23.240 --> 0:14:27.560
<v Speaker 5>gonna take it maybe a little bit further, because this

0:14:27.760 --> 0:14:30.720
<v Speaker 5>was the revelation for me, if you will, maybe too

0:14:30.720 --> 0:14:32.600
<v Speaker 5>strong of a word, but I'm gonna go with it

0:14:32.640 --> 0:14:35.720
<v Speaker 5>for now. I didn't rewatch this movie back in twenty

0:14:35.760 --> 0:14:38.680
<v Speaker 5>sixteen for the link later scenes list. I did in

0:14:38.720 --> 0:14:43.920
<v Speaker 5>twenty thirteen again for midnight, And at that time I

0:14:44.000 --> 0:14:48.080
<v Speaker 5>chalked up the conceit of the film to Jesse stalling.

0:14:48.480 --> 0:14:50.560
<v Speaker 5>You know, I wrote on letterbox in twenty thirteen, I

0:14:50.600 --> 0:14:53.160
<v Speaker 5>said it in twenty sixteen. During that top five, is

0:14:53.160 --> 0:14:55.600
<v Speaker 5>it me or are Jesse's repeated attempts to delay his

0:14:55.640 --> 0:14:58.360
<v Speaker 5>trip to the airport the equivalent of the knights gamesmanship

0:14:58.360 --> 0:15:01.480
<v Speaker 5>in the seventh Seal, a condemned man's maneuvers to stave

0:15:01.520 --> 0:15:05.280
<v Speaker 5>off death by prolonging the sublime. He just keeps saying, right, oh,

0:15:05.320 --> 0:15:07.520
<v Speaker 5>fifteen more minutes now, I'll just take you here. We'll

0:15:07.560 --> 0:15:09.680
<v Speaker 5>just go here. He's just trying to keep it going.

0:15:10.440 --> 0:15:14.200
<v Speaker 5>And something struck me this time, Josh. What clued me

0:15:14.240 --> 0:15:18.600
<v Speaker 5>in was the fact that early on there's multiple references

0:15:18.640 --> 0:15:22.560
<v Speaker 5>to time and not being late and you got to

0:15:22.600 --> 0:15:25.480
<v Speaker 5>catch your plane, all before they've even kind of stepped

0:15:25.480 --> 0:15:29.920
<v Speaker 5>out of the bookstore. And she knows this, and yet

0:15:30.680 --> 0:15:32.680
<v Speaker 5>they're talking about where they're going to go for coffee,

0:15:32.720 --> 0:15:34.640
<v Speaker 5>and she says, I've got a spot and I don't

0:15:34.680 --> 0:15:36.640
<v Speaker 5>know if she says it's nearby, but she says, you know,

0:15:36.720 --> 0:15:38.160
<v Speaker 5>I've got a spot I want to take you to.

0:15:38.840 --> 0:15:40.920
<v Speaker 5>And they start walking, and they must walk for a

0:15:40.960 --> 0:15:44.320
<v Speaker 5>half an hour, right, And so that of course could

0:15:44.360 --> 0:15:47.600
<v Speaker 5>be link later and Hawk and Dealthy being a little

0:15:47.600 --> 0:15:50.040
<v Speaker 5>bit cheeky, and I wouldn't put that past them, but

0:15:50.120 --> 0:15:53.760
<v Speaker 5>I think it does connect to what was the revelation

0:15:53.920 --> 0:15:59.400
<v Speaker 5>for me, and what I think might tie to what

0:15:59.440 --> 0:16:02.640
<v Speaker 5>the answer was in some way as you were getting

0:16:02.680 --> 0:16:05.200
<v Speaker 5>at for link later, what made it interesting? What made

0:16:05.200 --> 0:16:08.880
<v Speaker 5>it interesting for him to collaborate specifically with Hawk and

0:16:08.920 --> 0:16:14.360
<v Speaker 5>with Delpy on and before anyone listening to this thinks, really, Adam,

0:16:14.400 --> 0:16:16.520
<v Speaker 5>this is a revelation. You didn't pick up on this before,

0:16:17.440 --> 0:16:19.240
<v Speaker 5>I'll just say I think this may have been my

0:16:19.440 --> 0:16:21.960
<v Speaker 5>third viewing of the film. Only the second time was

0:16:22.000 --> 0:16:25.240
<v Speaker 5>back in twenty thirteen, and in twenty thirteen, I wasn't

0:16:25.320 --> 0:16:28.480
<v Speaker 5>watching it to discuss it. I was just prepping for

0:16:28.720 --> 0:16:32.560
<v Speaker 5>before midnight. I was just refreshing myself. Also film spotting

0:16:32.600 --> 0:16:35.760
<v Speaker 5>Pa Sophie Kempenar already chastised me. I got up the

0:16:35.760 --> 0:16:38.800
<v Speaker 5>next morning all eager to share with her what I

0:16:39.040 --> 0:16:42.360
<v Speaker 5>learned watching the film again, because she loves these films

0:16:42.360 --> 0:16:45.560
<v Speaker 5>and actually had just been in Paris and followed all

0:16:45.600 --> 0:16:49.160
<v Speaker 5>these steps took all of the picture she could from

0:16:49.200 --> 0:16:51.240
<v Speaker 5>all of the places they go to. And here was

0:16:51.240 --> 0:16:54.360
<v Speaker 5>her response, I'm a better film critic than you. This

0:16:54.400 --> 0:16:58.320
<v Speaker 5>is before sinset one oh one. Wow, harsh kids say

0:16:58.360 --> 0:17:02.080
<v Speaker 5>the regardest things. Okay, there is a major structural difference,

0:17:02.800 --> 0:17:05.240
<v Speaker 5>and it's not just the temporal aspect, the real time

0:17:05.440 --> 0:17:07.880
<v Speaker 5>or more real time approach, and I think it does

0:17:07.960 --> 0:17:10.040
<v Speaker 5>change the overall experience of the two movies. And it

0:17:10.080 --> 0:17:12.719
<v Speaker 5>goes back to what you're saying in terms of the

0:17:12.800 --> 0:17:16.640
<v Speaker 5>reversal of the setup a little bit. Jesse really does

0:17:16.800 --> 0:17:19.840
<v Speaker 5>drive the first movie. Yes, of course the first movie

0:17:19.880 --> 0:17:22.720
<v Speaker 5>is great because of their honesty and that Delpy doesn't

0:17:22.760 --> 0:17:26.119
<v Speaker 5>feel like she's playing second fiddle. But Jesse is the

0:17:26.160 --> 0:17:28.720
<v Speaker 5>one who gets her off the train, who makes the

0:17:28.800 --> 0:17:33.040
<v Speaker 5>first move, who does initiate most of the conversations and

0:17:33.080 --> 0:17:36.639
<v Speaker 5>what happens here. Selene drives the second one. She drives

0:17:36.680 --> 0:17:40.480
<v Speaker 5>this movie. She picks him up at the bookstore. She

0:17:40.680 --> 0:17:44.159
<v Speaker 5>essentially gets him to leave the train. Otherwise he's just

0:17:44.280 --> 0:17:46.680
<v Speaker 5>getting in the car and going to the airport.

0:17:46.760 --> 0:17:46.920
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:17:47.240 --> 0:17:50.879
<v Speaker 5>She gets him to wander around Paris and Josh, she

0:17:51.080 --> 0:17:55.760
<v Speaker 5>initiates almost all of the conversations. He is a responder

0:17:56.080 --> 0:17:59.080
<v Speaker 5>largely in this movie. So, especially if you were someone

0:17:59.240 --> 0:18:01.560
<v Speaker 5>who thought he was a little pretentious in the first film,

0:18:01.760 --> 0:18:04.879
<v Speaker 5>you probably do prefer this movie. And he is. I

0:18:04.920 --> 0:18:08.160
<v Speaker 5>had this same thing in my notes. Jesse Ethan Hawk

0:18:08.640 --> 0:18:11.399
<v Speaker 5>is largely relegated, and I don't think this is a

0:18:11.440 --> 0:18:13.840
<v Speaker 5>bad thing at all. I like the different dynamic between

0:18:13.880 --> 0:18:17.040
<v Speaker 5>the two films. He is largely relegated to being a

0:18:17.160 --> 0:18:20.480
<v Speaker 5>watcher in this movie, and that is fine because we

0:18:20.600 --> 0:18:23.920
<v Speaker 5>got plenty of his pontificating in the first movie. Delpy

0:18:24.040 --> 0:18:28.199
<v Speaker 5>is also so good and so incisive, and he is

0:18:28.359 --> 0:18:32.360
<v Speaker 5>such a good listener. Also, the way he watches her

0:18:33.400 --> 0:18:36.600
<v Speaker 5>is romantic as hell, which is how the movie ends,

0:18:36.640 --> 0:18:40.640
<v Speaker 5>of course too, in that very sexy romantic exchange between them,

0:18:40.680 --> 0:18:43.800
<v Speaker 5>where except for one word or two words, that two

0:18:43.800 --> 0:18:46.680
<v Speaker 5>word phrase that he has, otherwise he's just looking at her.

0:18:47.280 --> 0:18:49.919
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, And there's there's a structural reason for that, for

0:18:50.000 --> 0:18:53.199
<v Speaker 7>that shift, but there's also a psychological emotional one, you know,

0:18:53.440 --> 0:18:57.160
<v Speaker 7>because he's vulnerable here by admitting that he went back

0:18:57.160 --> 0:18:59.280
<v Speaker 7>and that he's the romantic. He can try to play

0:18:59.280 --> 0:19:01.520
<v Speaker 7>it off and she can try to play it off too,

0:19:02.040 --> 0:19:06.520
<v Speaker 7>But it has revealed that he opened himself up more

0:19:06.560 --> 0:19:10.159
<v Speaker 7>than she did. Bottom line, whatever the circumstances were, her

0:19:10.480 --> 0:19:14.720
<v Speaker 7>grandmother's death and that, you know, it's it's all understandable.

0:19:14.720 --> 0:19:16.320
<v Speaker 7>This isn't sane. One of them made the right decision,

0:19:16.359 --> 0:19:18.639
<v Speaker 7>one of them made the bad decision, but he is

0:19:18.760 --> 0:19:21.720
<v Speaker 7>now the more vulnerable one because of how things played out.

0:19:21.920 --> 0:19:24.159
<v Speaker 7>And I think that's part of what's going into the

0:19:24.240 --> 0:19:26.639
<v Speaker 7>dynamic as well. You know, as you were talking about,

0:19:26.760 --> 0:19:29.439
<v Speaker 7>you know, time and the considerations of time, which is

0:19:29.440 --> 0:19:31.320
<v Speaker 7>a huge linkinator thing, but just how it plays out

0:19:31.359 --> 0:19:33.400
<v Speaker 7>in this I just want to throw in also about

0:19:33.440 --> 0:19:37.280
<v Speaker 7>the ending the great Nina Simone song, it's actually a cover.

0:19:37.520 --> 0:19:40.240
<v Speaker 7>She's you know, singing a jazz standard that's been on

0:19:40.480 --> 0:19:41.680
<v Speaker 7>stage and in movies before.

0:19:41.680 --> 0:19:45.200
<v Speaker 3>She covered it. Just in Time is the name of that.

0:19:45.119 --> 0:19:47.439
<v Speaker 7>Stuff, of course, and I looked up the lyrics just

0:19:47.480 --> 0:19:48.400
<v Speaker 7>out of curiosity.

0:19:49.040 --> 0:19:49.680
<v Speaker 3>Just in time.

0:19:49.840 --> 0:19:52.560
<v Speaker 7>You found me, just in time before you came. My

0:19:52.720 --> 0:19:53.960
<v Speaker 7>time was running low.

0:19:54.480 --> 0:20:04.880
<v Speaker 4>Before you came, I was lost.

0:20:05.000 --> 0:20:08.080
<v Speaker 7>So the first the first two stanzas time mentioned three times,

0:20:09.080 --> 0:20:12.080
<v Speaker 7>it's you know, clearly probably why it was chosen. It's

0:20:12.080 --> 0:20:17.480
<v Speaker 7>also musically perfect for the moment and Delpi's performance in

0:20:17.480 --> 0:20:20.120
<v Speaker 7>that moment. Since you touched our performance, let's go there,

0:20:20.119 --> 0:20:22.320
<v Speaker 7>and I'm going to start at the ending because I'm

0:20:22.359 --> 0:20:26.240
<v Speaker 7>here now. It's not only that it's seductive. But let's

0:20:26.240 --> 0:20:29.240
<v Speaker 7>go back a little earlier, a few moments earlier, where

0:20:29.240 --> 0:20:32.159
<v Speaker 7>she's playing her waltz. I think she calls it this

0:20:32.320 --> 0:20:33.280
<v Speaker 7>waltz for him.

0:20:33.560 --> 0:20:35.320
<v Speaker 5>It's that's how great is that?

0:20:35.840 --> 0:20:36.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:20:36.080 --> 0:20:39.639
<v Speaker 7>And she's on the guitar, and you know, I think

0:20:39.680 --> 0:20:43.040
<v Speaker 7>what I love about that little bit is that you

0:20:43.080 --> 0:20:45.080
<v Speaker 7>see she's doing it for him, And there are moments

0:20:45.119 --> 0:20:46.760
<v Speaker 7>where she'll look up at him and kind of self

0:20:46.800 --> 0:20:47.960
<v Speaker 7>deprecatingly laugh.

0:20:49.119 --> 0:20:50.200
<v Speaker 3>But there's also nice.

0:20:50.000 --> 0:20:52.760
<v Speaker 7>Little moments in the performance where she gets lost in

0:20:52.840 --> 0:20:56.280
<v Speaker 7>the music. You can tell like she's no longer thinking

0:20:56.280 --> 0:20:59.080
<v Speaker 7>about him in these two seconds. She's thinking about how

0:20:59.119 --> 0:21:04.000
<v Speaker 7>much she's enjoying doing this musical performance, and what does

0:21:04.000 --> 0:21:07.480
<v Speaker 7>that point to. She's an artist too. This is related

0:21:07.560 --> 0:21:10.679
<v Speaker 7>to the kind of shifts in the dynamic from the

0:21:10.720 --> 0:21:14.640
<v Speaker 7>first film to this one. Listening to this again, maybe

0:21:14.640 --> 0:21:18.520
<v Speaker 7>an obvious observation, we'll see if Sophia has something mean

0:21:18.600 --> 0:21:21.040
<v Speaker 7>to say to me, But listening to her lyrics, you

0:21:21.119 --> 0:21:25.080
<v Speaker 7>realize this waltz is her version of Jesse's book. He's

0:21:25.080 --> 0:21:28.640
<v Speaker 7>written this book all about their relationship. She has been

0:21:28.960 --> 0:21:32.719
<v Speaker 7>true to her nature, quietly alone in her apartment writing

0:21:32.760 --> 0:21:35.560
<v Speaker 7>a song she will probably never perform to anyone else

0:21:36.000 --> 0:21:40.760
<v Speaker 7>about her experience of their relationship because it is about

0:21:40.800 --> 0:21:44.240
<v Speaker 7>someone who she, you know, basically missed out on or

0:21:44.280 --> 0:21:47.120
<v Speaker 7>there was a fleeting moment, and that's that's her version

0:21:47.160 --> 0:21:50.040
<v Speaker 7>of the book. So Delpy is wonderful in so many

0:21:50.040 --> 0:21:52.919
<v Speaker 7>different registers in that final sequence, and then she just

0:21:53.080 --> 0:21:55.760
<v Speaker 7>gets some great saline moments throughout because she gets, you know,

0:21:56.080 --> 0:21:58.760
<v Speaker 7>more of the dialogue here in a sense I love

0:21:59.040 --> 0:22:01.199
<v Speaker 7>one of my favorites might be I'm not getting angry,

0:22:01.240 --> 0:22:05.119
<v Speaker 7>I'm not getting angry. Spitthead him twice, which is, you know,

0:22:05.600 --> 0:22:06.960
<v Speaker 7>just kind of sums.

0:22:06.560 --> 0:22:08.040
<v Speaker 3>Her character up in so many ways.

0:22:08.040 --> 0:22:12.000
<v Speaker 7>But she's she's wonderful, He's great, She's wonderful. Together, there's

0:22:12.040 --> 0:22:12.879
<v Speaker 7>something even better.

0:22:13.880 --> 0:22:16.919
<v Speaker 2>Let me sing you I owes.

0:22:18.560 --> 0:22:23.000
<v Speaker 3>Out of nowhere, out of my thoughts.

0:22:23.480 --> 0:22:26.560
<v Speaker 2>Let me sing you O oldes.

0:22:28.280 --> 0:22:30.840
<v Speaker 8>About this one night stand.

0:22:34.359 --> 0:22:37.359
<v Speaker 2>Well, for me, that night.

0:22:39.200 --> 0:22:42.320
<v Speaker 9>Everything I always drammed.

0:22:41.880 --> 0:22:42.879
<v Speaker 7>On in line.

0:22:43.280 --> 0:22:47.320
<v Speaker 5>What I love about that is I did register the

0:22:47.400 --> 0:22:50.440
<v Speaker 5>bit of performance that it is. But I didn't make

0:22:50.480 --> 0:22:53.560
<v Speaker 5>the connection back to the fact that he wrote a book,

0:22:53.600 --> 0:22:56.240
<v Speaker 5>and this is sort of her version of that. And

0:22:56.240 --> 0:22:59.199
<v Speaker 5>the reason that I registered the act of performance is

0:22:59.680 --> 0:23:03.040
<v Speaker 5>I looked at my top five link later scenes. Sam

0:23:03.080 --> 0:23:06.680
<v Speaker 5>had referenced it in our script notes, and so I figured, well, man,

0:23:06.720 --> 0:23:09.080
<v Speaker 5>now that I've rewatched the movie, did I make the

0:23:09.160 --> 0:23:12.800
<v Speaker 5>right choices? And we'll get to One of my choices

0:23:12.960 --> 0:23:15.840
<v Speaker 5>was probably here in a little bit. My number two

0:23:16.240 --> 0:23:19.040
<v Speaker 5>choice was that ending and baby, are you going to

0:23:19.080 --> 0:23:21.800
<v Speaker 5>miss That plane? Which followed my number three choice, which

0:23:21.840 --> 0:23:26.600
<v Speaker 5>was from before Sunrise where they do that whole fake

0:23:26.760 --> 0:23:29.600
<v Speaker 5>phone call thing with each other. It's all about acting

0:23:29.720 --> 0:23:32.320
<v Speaker 5>and performance where they finally get to say what they

0:23:32.560 --> 0:23:35.320
<v Speaker 5>really are thinking about each other, but they get to

0:23:35.400 --> 0:23:38.040
<v Speaker 5>do it under the guise of performance because they are

0:23:38.240 --> 0:23:40.320
<v Speaker 5>sort of playing a role even though they really are

0:23:40.400 --> 0:23:43.640
<v Speaker 5>being themselves. So there is that connection or that link

0:23:43.720 --> 0:23:49.719
<v Speaker 5>between the artifice and what they're really exposing about themselves

0:23:49.720 --> 0:23:53.560
<v Speaker 5>in the two films. I had never fully noticed this before, Josh,

0:23:53.600 --> 0:23:57.160
<v Speaker 5>and it might be a really minor thing, but that

0:23:57.240 --> 0:24:01.840
<v Speaker 5>last line here, I am again I think being a romantic,

0:24:02.240 --> 0:24:04.399
<v Speaker 5>and I realized that maybe I need to temper it

0:24:04.440 --> 0:24:08.600
<v Speaker 5>again and maybe not go full blown cynic, but just

0:24:09.200 --> 0:24:12.320
<v Speaker 5>temper the romanticism a little bit. I always took that

0:24:12.440 --> 0:24:15.320
<v Speaker 5>last line, baby, you're going to miss that plane as

0:24:15.960 --> 0:24:20.320
<v Speaker 5>full on I'm not letting you go. You know you're

0:24:20.320 --> 0:24:23.760
<v Speaker 5>not leaving. We both know we're meant to be together,

0:24:24.320 --> 0:24:28.679
<v Speaker 5>and this is the romance of our lifetimes and our dreams,

0:24:28.680 --> 0:24:31.560
<v Speaker 5>and we finally found each other again after nine years.

0:24:31.760 --> 0:24:36.200
<v Speaker 5>Is in everything great? And I realized with Delpy's line

0:24:36.240 --> 0:24:39.600
<v Speaker 5>delivery that you at least have to keep open the

0:24:39.640 --> 0:24:44.199
<v Speaker 5>interpretation that it's just a statement of fact that at

0:24:44.200 --> 0:24:47.199
<v Speaker 5>this point, baby, you're going to miss that plane, that

0:24:47.320 --> 0:24:50.240
<v Speaker 5>he is almost certainly going to miss that plane, and

0:24:50.280 --> 0:24:55.000
<v Speaker 5>the door, the door for him leaving is at some

0:24:55.160 --> 0:24:58.720
<v Speaker 5>point is still open literally and metaphorically. And I love

0:24:58.800 --> 0:25:01.040
<v Speaker 5>that there is that possibility dual meaning.

0:25:01.080 --> 0:25:07.280
<v Speaker 7>Well, there's she has a level of defense before just

0:25:07.320 --> 0:25:09.360
<v Speaker 7>coming out and saying it that you're going to miss

0:25:09.400 --> 0:25:11.160
<v Speaker 7>that plane. I want you here, we want we should

0:25:11.160 --> 0:25:14.280
<v Speaker 7>be together. Because she delivers that line as part of

0:25:14.280 --> 0:25:17.520
<v Speaker 7>her Nina Simone impersonation, she's not delivering it as Selene.

0:25:17.680 --> 0:25:18.160
<v Speaker 3>That's right.

0:25:19.800 --> 0:25:23.879
<v Speaker 7>Conversation that is allowing them to be honest, but in

0:25:23.960 --> 0:25:27.760
<v Speaker 7>the guise of performance. I think I read this similarly.

0:25:27.920 --> 0:25:30.760
<v Speaker 7>She's being honest, she wants them to miss that plane,

0:25:30.840 --> 0:25:34.720
<v Speaker 7>she wants them to stay romantically, but she's still buffering

0:25:34.760 --> 0:25:38.840
<v Speaker 7>it with performance. There's just a little bit of safety there.

0:25:38.960 --> 0:25:42.440
<v Speaker 7>She's you know again, how she's maybe distinct from Jesse.

0:25:43.119 --> 0:25:46.480
<v Speaker 7>She's not allowing herself to be as vulnerable as she

0:25:46.600 --> 0:25:49.560
<v Speaker 7>could by delivering the statement in that way.

0:25:49.960 --> 0:25:52.679
<v Speaker 5>M hm, I love too. This is another thing I

0:25:52.760 --> 0:25:56.919
<v Speaker 5>never really paid attention to. The shot and the scene

0:25:57.200 --> 0:26:00.320
<v Speaker 5>right before they arrive, right before they get a to

0:26:00.480 --> 0:26:04.439
<v Speaker 5>the apartment, the deliberation, the care that link later takes

0:26:04.480 --> 0:26:08.040
<v Speaker 5>that they take. The performers as they walk up the stairs,

0:26:08.240 --> 0:26:13.000
<v Speaker 5>that spiral staircase seems to take forever, and there is

0:26:13.040 --> 0:26:16.520
<v Speaker 5>a sense of anticipation. There is a sense of anxiety

0:26:16.600 --> 0:26:19.679
<v Speaker 5>too though, because I think they both they both know

0:26:20.080 --> 0:26:23.960
<v Speaker 5>that they don't know what they're about to get themselves into.

0:26:24.359 --> 0:26:27.000
<v Speaker 5>We don't know, and they are not aware fully of

0:26:27.280 --> 0:26:30.800
<v Speaker 5>where this could take them. But I think they fundamentally

0:26:30.840 --> 0:26:33.960
<v Speaker 5>get that once they cross sort of a threshold, that

0:26:34.080 --> 0:26:37.679
<v Speaker 5>threshold being the door into her apartment, who knows where

0:26:37.760 --> 0:26:40.440
<v Speaker 5>this could lead? But it's a place from which they

0:26:40.480 --> 0:26:43.600
<v Speaker 5>maybe can never fully come back from. And I just

0:26:43.880 --> 0:26:46.200
<v Speaker 5>the way you watch Hawk with his sort of wide

0:26:46.240 --> 0:26:48.520
<v Speaker 5>eyed he almost looks like a kid, but there's also

0:26:49.359 --> 0:26:51.600
<v Speaker 5>the kid on Christmas morning, but also a little bit

0:26:51.640 --> 0:26:54.360
<v Speaker 5>afraid of what he's getting into. You see it all,

0:26:54.359 --> 0:26:56.800
<v Speaker 5>and it's just a single steady cam shot that follows

0:26:56.840 --> 0:26:58.360
<v Speaker 5>them up the stairs. It's really beautiful.

0:26:58.800 --> 0:27:01.520
<v Speaker 7>It's to me a direct callback to one of my

0:27:01.560 --> 0:27:05.440
<v Speaker 7>favorite link later scenes from before Sunrise, the listening booth,

0:27:05.840 --> 0:27:10.359
<v Speaker 7>because what it is built upon are them taking turns

0:27:10.600 --> 0:27:12.520
<v Speaker 7>looking at each other when the other one is not

0:27:13.119 --> 0:27:16.639
<v Speaker 7>and looking away, and each note hits what you're describing,

0:27:16.800 --> 0:27:20.879
<v Speaker 7>the hesitancy and the excitement. There are smiles and then

0:27:20.880 --> 0:27:24.439
<v Speaker 7>there are smiles that suddenly fade. They do catch eyes,

0:27:24.560 --> 0:27:27.439
<v Speaker 7>but not the entire time. They're not locked. And that

0:27:27.720 --> 0:27:30.800
<v Speaker 7>exact back and forth is what happens in the Listening

0:27:30.800 --> 0:27:33.680
<v Speaker 7>Booth in a very similar situation. It's where they're considering

0:27:33.760 --> 0:27:36.879
<v Speaker 7>how serious is this? In that listening booth, they're asking

0:27:36.880 --> 0:27:39.240
<v Speaker 7>themselves the same question in this staircase. And there are

0:27:39.240 --> 0:27:42.919
<v Speaker 7>a couple other callbacks, or at least one other couple

0:27:43.000 --> 0:27:46.159
<v Speaker 7>instances of a particular callback. I know we've talked about

0:27:47.440 --> 0:27:50.359
<v Speaker 7>the touching, yes, or almost touching. I want to go

0:27:50.520 --> 0:27:54.360
<v Speaker 7>Leen's hair in before sunrise, we talked about, you know

0:27:55.280 --> 0:27:58.439
<v Speaker 7>how this is possibly stolen when we sense watched and

0:27:58.520 --> 0:28:01.359
<v Speaker 7>discussed Agnes Vardis Clay from five to seven and Clo

0:28:01.440 --> 0:28:04.800
<v Speaker 7>and Antoine that happens with them. I think it's on you. No,

0:28:04.880 --> 0:28:08.879
<v Speaker 7>it's on the tram here and before sunrise where Jesse

0:28:09.280 --> 0:28:11.960
<v Speaker 7>tentatively reaches out for Selene's hair and then takes his

0:28:12.000 --> 0:28:14.479
<v Speaker 7>hand away. I love the moment where they're walking up

0:28:14.520 --> 0:28:17.440
<v Speaker 7>some stairs and these leaves are falling around them. It's

0:28:17.480 --> 0:28:20.240
<v Speaker 7>kind of like an outdoor staircase, and he reaches out.

0:28:20.280 --> 0:28:22.600
<v Speaker 7>I rewounded a couple times, and I almost wonder if

0:28:22.600 --> 0:28:26.200
<v Speaker 7>it's improvised, because he reaches out and it looks like

0:28:26.240 --> 0:28:28.760
<v Speaker 7>a leaf maybe is falling behind her head, and you

0:28:28.800 --> 0:28:31.040
<v Speaker 7>can't tell if he knocks it away or grabs it

0:28:31.119 --> 0:28:34.359
<v Speaker 7>or just pulls his hand back. But then she does it,

0:28:34.680 --> 0:28:37.080
<v Speaker 7>so now it becomes here. We're back to the dynamic

0:28:37.119 --> 0:28:40.360
<v Speaker 7>flipping in the car. Near the end, she reaches out

0:28:40.440 --> 0:28:43.640
<v Speaker 7>to just touch his head but stops. So just a

0:28:43.680 --> 0:28:47.360
<v Speaker 7>lovely callback to one of this series's loveliest moments.

0:28:47.760 --> 0:28:50.960
<v Speaker 5>Yes, and that really stood out to me this time.

0:28:51.000 --> 0:28:53.320
<v Speaker 5>That was my number five. I referenced it earlier. My

0:28:53.360 --> 0:28:56.560
<v Speaker 5>number five was the car scene link later scene. I

0:28:56.680 --> 0:28:58.880
<v Speaker 5>was fine until I read your effing book. And what's

0:28:58.920 --> 0:29:01.760
<v Speaker 5>so great about that scene is partly that that's where

0:29:01.840 --> 0:29:04.800
<v Speaker 5>it really does get real. They're being honest with each

0:29:04.840 --> 0:29:07.960
<v Speaker 5>other in different ways. It builds throughout, but it builds

0:29:08.120 --> 0:29:11.560
<v Speaker 5>to this scene where they both get brutally honest with

0:29:11.600 --> 0:29:14.680
<v Speaker 5>each other, where the emotions come out. Remember, she at

0:29:14.680 --> 0:29:17.240
<v Speaker 5>one point really wants to get out of the car.

0:29:18.280 --> 0:29:21.040
<v Speaker 5>He has to almost restrain her from getting out of

0:29:21.040 --> 0:29:21.800
<v Speaker 5>the car. Right.

0:29:21.840 --> 0:29:24.040
<v Speaker 7>I think it's where she's her most vulnerable. It's why

0:29:24.040 --> 0:29:26.480
<v Speaker 7>it gets so real is now she has put herself

0:29:26.480 --> 0:29:28.680
<v Speaker 7>in the same position he was when he admitted he

0:29:28.720 --> 0:29:29.760
<v Speaker 7>came back and tried to.

0:29:29.680 --> 0:29:34.160
<v Speaker 5>Be Yeah, and at one point, I think earlier in

0:29:34.200 --> 0:29:38.320
<v Speaker 5>that scene, he almost touches her to try to comfort her.

0:29:38.440 --> 0:29:41.120
<v Speaker 5>It's not quite the gesture that she's going to make,

0:29:41.160 --> 0:29:43.920
<v Speaker 5>and it's not quite the gesture he makes that everyone

0:29:44.000 --> 0:29:49.840
<v Speaker 5>remembers from before Sunrise. But then after he finally exposes

0:29:50.120 --> 0:29:54.880
<v Speaker 5>his vulnerability and reveals how rough his life is at

0:29:54.880 --> 0:30:01.160
<v Speaker 5>the moment. That's when she reciprocates, reciprocates the uster from

0:30:01.440 --> 0:30:04.960
<v Speaker 5>across almost a decade now and across movies to before

0:30:05.000 --> 0:30:09.480
<v Speaker 5>Sunrise and Josh, what stands out about that is that

0:30:09.880 --> 0:30:13.400
<v Speaker 5>it's not just link Later being clever and going well,

0:30:13.840 --> 0:30:16.080
<v Speaker 5>Jesse did it in the first movie, So Selene's gonna

0:30:16.120 --> 0:30:20.040
<v Speaker 5>do it here. Of course she's the one who's doing

0:30:20.080 --> 0:30:24.160
<v Speaker 5>it here. She's the one who is driving the entire film.

0:30:24.400 --> 0:30:27.880
<v Speaker 5>She's the more active, dominant presence. It makes sense that

0:30:27.960 --> 0:30:30.479
<v Speaker 5>she would be the one who would almost comfort him

0:30:30.480 --> 0:30:34.840
<v Speaker 5>in that moment. But there's more. Remember his line earlier

0:30:34.920 --> 0:30:39.280
<v Speaker 5>in the film, and I'll just say this too. There

0:30:39.360 --> 0:30:43.240
<v Speaker 5>is something I had also kind of put in the

0:30:43.240 --> 0:30:45.480
<v Speaker 5>back of my brain about this film, thinking about it

0:30:45.520 --> 0:30:48.520
<v Speaker 5>as purely romantic, even though knowing that there were moments

0:30:48.520 --> 0:30:52.600
<v Speaker 5>of brutal honesty. There is a certain melancholy and bittersweetness

0:30:52.680 --> 0:30:55.120
<v Speaker 5>that they bring up over and over again about the

0:30:55.200 --> 0:30:58.240
<v Speaker 5>nine years they lost. I didn't really latch onto that,

0:30:58.360 --> 0:31:02.280
<v Speaker 5>but that is real this why didn't we do this?

0:31:02.640 --> 0:31:07.480
<v Speaker 5>And that regret those nine years being gone? And Hawk says,

0:31:07.880 --> 0:31:11.000
<v Speaker 5>not too long before the scene in the car, if

0:31:11.040 --> 0:31:13.800
<v Speaker 5>somebody would touch me, I would dissolve into molecules. That

0:31:14.320 --> 0:31:19.360
<v Speaker 5>sign that then raises the stakes when she almost touches him. Right,

0:31:19.440 --> 0:31:22.440
<v Speaker 5>it's not just that that it's reversed and that she's

0:31:22.480 --> 0:31:24.520
<v Speaker 5>the one. It makes sense would do that as the

0:31:24.520 --> 0:31:27.480
<v Speaker 5>dominant presence. But what if she does touch him there.

0:31:27.680 --> 0:31:29.560
<v Speaker 7>Well, they have and they have that hug, and she

0:31:29.640 --> 0:31:32.360
<v Speaker 7>asks him, doesn't she are you dissolving her something along?

0:31:32.440 --> 0:31:35.320
<v Speaker 5>She calls back to it. She does. I wanted to

0:31:35.320 --> 0:31:36.920
<v Speaker 5>ask you this or bring it up, and I'll throw

0:31:36.920 --> 0:31:38.880
<v Speaker 5>it out to the listeners too, because I just ran

0:31:38.960 --> 0:31:41.240
<v Speaker 5>out of time at the last minute, and I guess

0:31:41.240 --> 0:31:42.880
<v Speaker 5>it's kind of silly to bring up something that I

0:31:42.880 --> 0:31:48.720
<v Speaker 5>could just answer myself. But doesn't before Sunrise end with

0:31:48.880 --> 0:31:54.480
<v Speaker 5>kind of a lovely little montage of the different locations.

0:31:54.080 --> 0:31:58.240
<v Speaker 7>Visiting the travel Yeah, so here's another reversal.

0:31:59.200 --> 0:32:06.280
<v Speaker 5>Doesn't before on set actually begin with hitting the spots

0:32:06.680 --> 0:32:12.080
<v Speaker 5>that they go to. It's like it's foreshadowing. It's setting

0:32:12.160 --> 0:32:15.400
<v Speaker 5>you up rather than looking back, which is lovely. And

0:32:15.440 --> 0:32:18.240
<v Speaker 5>what clued me into that was I saw that they

0:32:18.840 --> 0:32:21.040
<v Speaker 5>go to the cafe. I saw the sign of the cafe,

0:32:21.720 --> 0:32:23.920
<v Speaker 5>and I started to realize oh, some of these spots

0:32:23.960 --> 0:32:26.320
<v Speaker 5>are familiar, and of course those are the spots they

0:32:26.440 --> 0:32:29.680
<v Speaker 5>end up going to. So something about the camera they're

0:32:30.040 --> 0:32:32.800
<v Speaker 5>telling us ahead of time link later cluing us in

0:32:32.840 --> 0:32:36.240
<v Speaker 5>ahead of time, as if this stuff maybe was almost

0:32:36.280 --> 0:32:38.880
<v Speaker 5>faded in some way and laid out before us. Just

0:32:38.920 --> 0:32:42.320
<v Speaker 5>seems so perfect, especially with all the conversations they're having

0:32:42.360 --> 0:32:45.560
<v Speaker 5>about time and everything happening sort of simultaneously.

0:32:45.800 --> 0:32:47.880
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, a nice touch and also a nice counter to

0:32:47.880 --> 0:32:50.880
<v Speaker 7>how this movie ends, which is then a fade to

0:32:50.920 --> 0:32:56.160
<v Speaker 7>black as action is still taking place, but it now

0:32:56.240 --> 0:32:57.080
<v Speaker 7>becomes private.

0:32:57.320 --> 0:32:57.560
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:32:57.760 --> 0:33:01.000
<v Speaker 7>It's like we we need to leave them to be

0:33:01.080 --> 0:33:03.280
<v Speaker 7>together now, and this movie needs.

0:33:03.120 --> 0:33:06.520
<v Speaker 5>To end another nice little flourish And this is what

0:33:06.640 --> 0:33:12.000
<v Speaker 5>all clothes on that bookstore moment when they ask him

0:33:12.040 --> 0:33:14.720
<v Speaker 5>a question about what he's working on next, and Jesse

0:33:14.880 --> 0:33:18.680
<v Speaker 5>goes off on this thing he'd always had wanted to write,

0:33:18.720 --> 0:33:23.640
<v Speaker 5>and he's waxing about how time is a lie and yeah,

0:33:23.720 --> 0:33:27.200
<v Speaker 5>and the pop song, the pop song. Everything's happening within

0:33:27.640 --> 0:33:30.760
<v Speaker 5>that moment somehow. But Josh, it really is a beautiful

0:33:30.800 --> 0:33:34.160
<v Speaker 5>thing that I never fully hear again put together that

0:33:35.320 --> 0:33:39.560
<v Speaker 5>he's narrating this story and what he's saying, is all

0:33:39.600 --> 0:33:42.480
<v Speaker 5>his life is just folding into itself, and it's obvious

0:33:42.480 --> 0:33:44.400
<v Speaker 5>to him that time is a lie, that it's all

0:33:44.400 --> 0:33:47.200
<v Speaker 5>happening all the time, and inside every moment is another moment,

0:33:47.560 --> 0:33:50.840
<v Speaker 5>all happening simultaneously. And at that moment, he's saying that

0:33:51.680 --> 0:33:55.240
<v Speaker 5>is when he sees her, And so he's having this

0:33:55.320 --> 0:33:57.400
<v Speaker 5>moment where he's thinking about a book that he might

0:33:57.440 --> 0:33:59.600
<v Speaker 5>write at some point, but it's also a book that

0:33:59.640 --> 0:34:03.640
<v Speaker 5>he's thought about many times throughout his life. He's seeing her,

0:34:04.200 --> 0:34:08.319
<v Speaker 5>which is happening in the present, but then he's probably

0:34:08.360 --> 0:34:12.000
<v Speaker 5>potentially thinking about, who knows, a future, a future with

0:34:12.040 --> 0:34:15.120
<v Speaker 5>her that might even just be the next twenty minutes

0:34:15.400 --> 0:34:21.160
<v Speaker 5>of them reuniting. But then he's thinking about the night

0:34:21.200 --> 0:34:23.239
<v Speaker 5>they had nine years ago, and we always thinking about

0:34:23.239 --> 0:34:25.839
<v Speaker 5>that because of course he is. But also Link later

0:34:25.960 --> 0:34:29.200
<v Speaker 5>shows us those memories in his head. All of it's

0:34:29.239 --> 0:34:33.240
<v Speaker 5>happening simultaneously, time collapsing in that moment.

0:34:33.560 --> 0:34:36.800
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, and I like how she's you know, she's almost

0:34:36.800 --> 0:34:39.680
<v Speaker 7>a vision there standing there where you do, which I

0:34:39.719 --> 0:34:41.239
<v Speaker 7>think almost He does a little double take.

0:34:41.680 --> 0:34:42.520
<v Speaker 3>Is she really there?

0:34:42.640 --> 0:34:46.759
<v Speaker 7>Is this really like she's somehow transported through time? To

0:34:46.880 --> 0:34:49.480
<v Speaker 7>be there, even though it's completely logical that she is.

0:34:50.160 --> 0:34:52.000
<v Speaker 7>I said, I was going to close there. But two

0:34:52.000 --> 0:34:53.360
<v Speaker 7>other just really quick things.

0:34:54.560 --> 0:34:59.919
<v Speaker 5>At the beginning of Before Sunrise, they have that Mary

0:35:00.120 --> 0:35:02.680
<v Speaker 5>couple that gets into a fight with each other, and

0:35:02.719 --> 0:35:07.120
<v Speaker 5>then here you have Ethan Hawke saying that line about

0:35:07.520 --> 0:35:10.600
<v Speaker 5>the couple being divorced at fifty two. And it's just

0:35:10.680 --> 0:35:15.279
<v Speaker 5>interesting to think about those two encounters that exchange at

0:35:15.320 --> 0:35:18.600
<v Speaker 5>the beginning of Sunrise and that line here in Sunset

0:35:18.719 --> 0:35:23.360
<v Speaker 5>as we look forward to what may happen in Before Midnight.

0:35:24.239 --> 0:35:27.759
<v Speaker 5>The other thing that is a totally random aside, but

0:35:27.800 --> 0:35:29.799
<v Speaker 5>it just kind of strikes me as hilarious. And I've

0:35:29.840 --> 0:35:33.240
<v Speaker 5>mentioned this one time on the show before. You may remember, Josh,

0:35:33.280 --> 0:35:40.960
<v Speaker 5>that I discovered pretty randomly actually that back in twenty

0:35:41.080 --> 0:35:45.360
<v Speaker 5>seventeen or something, PBS did a documentary about Richard Linklater

0:35:46.000 --> 0:35:49.239
<v Speaker 5>looking at his career up to that point, and I

0:35:49.320 --> 0:35:53.160
<v Speaker 5>found out that, unbeknownst to me, they used audio from

0:35:53.239 --> 0:35:55.799
<v Speaker 5>the early days of sinecast that you can hear my

0:35:55.960 --> 0:36:00.279
<v Speaker 5>voice in Sam's voice in this documentary. They don't ferent

0:36:00.360 --> 0:36:02.879
<v Speaker 5>cynecastory thing. It's just part of a montage. But Sam

0:36:02.920 --> 0:36:05.359
<v Speaker 5>has a couple lines. I have one line, and we're

0:36:05.400 --> 0:36:10.800
<v Speaker 5>just dogging link Later, right, So I'm getting ready to

0:36:10.840 --> 0:36:14.000
<v Speaker 5>watch before Sunset, and of course I'm doing what most

0:36:14.040 --> 0:36:15.719
<v Speaker 5>of us do. Now, I'm about to bring it up

0:36:15.719 --> 0:36:19.000
<v Speaker 5>on some VOD platform and then I go, wait a second,

0:36:19.000 --> 0:36:22.040
<v Speaker 5>I have the Before Trilogy on Criterion. I should put

0:36:22.040 --> 0:36:24.279
<v Speaker 5>the disc in. I watch it, and then I think, well,

0:36:24.280 --> 0:36:27.080
<v Speaker 5>I've got the Criterion disc. I wonder what the bonus

0:36:27.080 --> 0:36:31.360
<v Speaker 5>features are. I go to the supplements. The first supplement

0:36:31.880 --> 0:36:34.719
<v Speaker 5>is this PBS documentary. Oh no, And I go, wait

0:36:34.760 --> 0:36:37.000
<v Speaker 5>a second, are you kidding me? Is this no? Is

0:36:37.080 --> 0:36:40.680
<v Speaker 5>this the thing? And I start fast forwarding through it,

0:36:40.880 --> 0:36:44.120
<v Speaker 5>and there it is. At the seventy one minute mark,

0:36:44.239 --> 0:36:47.120
<v Speaker 5>they're at the point where they're they're doing this montage,

0:36:47.120 --> 0:36:51.200
<v Speaker 5>this really quick montage talking about how link Later was

0:36:51.239 --> 0:36:52.839
<v Speaker 5>at this point in his career where he was kind

0:36:52.840 --> 0:36:58.000
<v Speaker 5>of unbankable. He'd had some movies that weren't making money

0:36:58.040 --> 0:37:00.800
<v Speaker 5>and critics weren't big on them, like Bad News Bears

0:37:00.880 --> 0:37:04.000
<v Speaker 5>and Fast Food Nation. Though ironically I liked Fast Food Nation.

0:37:04.080 --> 0:37:07.800
<v Speaker 5>I think Sam did too. And there it is. I'm

0:37:08.440 --> 0:37:13.840
<v Speaker 5>finally on a Criterion collection disc. I'm featured not so featured.

0:37:13.840 --> 0:37:15.719
<v Speaker 5>But you know what I mean. I'm included in a

0:37:15.719 --> 0:37:18.880
<v Speaker 5>criterion collection disc of one of my all time favorite films,

0:37:19.239 --> 0:37:23.239
<v Speaker 5>and it's me insulting the filmmaker because I'm tearing down

0:37:23.280 --> 0:37:29.480
<v Speaker 5>the bad news bears. That not really fair, but there

0:37:29.520 --> 0:37:33.720
<v Speaker 5>it is to hot then Before Sunset is currently available

0:37:33.880 --> 0:37:37.080
<v Speaker 5>VOD on most platforms and in that shrink wrap Criterion

0:37:37.080 --> 0:37:39.879
<v Speaker 5>collection edition of the Before trilogy you have in case

0:37:39.920 --> 0:37:40.680
<v Speaker 5>of emergency.

0:37:41.000 --> 0:37:42.840
<v Speaker 7>Listening is the number one thing you can do to

0:37:42.920 --> 0:37:46.000
<v Speaker 7>support an independently produced show like film Spotting. There are

0:37:46.000 --> 0:37:47.680
<v Speaker 7>a couple more things you can do. You can take

0:37:47.680 --> 0:37:49.760
<v Speaker 7>a minute to give us a rating or a review

0:37:49.800 --> 0:37:53.080
<v Speaker 7>on Apple Podcasts or Spotify. Doesn't matter if you're a

0:37:53.080 --> 0:37:55.640
<v Speaker 7>first time listener or have been listening for twenty years.

0:37:55.800 --> 0:37:59.040
<v Speaker 7>Every new review helps us reach new listeners. Another way

0:37:59.040 --> 0:38:02.800
<v Speaker 7>to support us the Film Spotting Family. At film spottingfamily

0:38:02.920 --> 0:38:06.120
<v Speaker 7>dot com, we want to thank family member Susie in

0:38:06.200 --> 0:38:06.760
<v Speaker 7>Saint Paul.

0:38:07.000 --> 0:38:09.920
<v Speaker 5>Susie writes she's been listening for years. Her favorite review

0:38:10.040 --> 0:38:13.880
<v Speaker 5>or segment Top five movies with beaches or did I

0:38:13.960 --> 0:38:17.719
<v Speaker 5>Dream That Not a Dream? Josh Episode eight thirty four,

0:38:18.239 --> 0:38:21.920
<v Speaker 5>Top five beach scenes inspired by m Knight Shamlan's Old,

0:38:22.400 --> 0:38:25.200
<v Speaker 5>which it says we did not review, but I don't

0:38:25.239 --> 0:38:27.759
<v Speaker 5>remember doing that Top five. I feel like you talked

0:38:27.760 --> 0:38:29.759
<v Speaker 5>about Old and maybe maybe you had a guest.

0:38:29.800 --> 0:38:30.880
<v Speaker 3>There might have been a guest.

0:38:31.160 --> 0:38:34.239
<v Speaker 7>Yes, I know I've reviewed it, and I think I've

0:38:34.280 --> 0:38:35.200
<v Speaker 7>talked about it on the show.

0:38:35.880 --> 0:38:38.080
<v Speaker 5>A review we got wrong. You didn't get it wrong.

0:38:38.239 --> 0:38:41.680
<v Speaker 5>But watch Josh O'Connor in God's Own Country and you

0:38:41.680 --> 0:38:42.480
<v Speaker 5>will be enthralled.

0:38:42.840 --> 0:38:44.640
<v Speaker 7>We believe we do. Can we just do a Josh

0:38:44.680 --> 0:38:47.960
<v Speaker 7>O'Connor Mini mariyth. I feel like there's a handful we

0:38:48.040 --> 0:38:49.360
<v Speaker 7>need to catch up with both of us.

0:38:49.360 --> 0:38:52.040
<v Speaker 5>There are listeners around the world right now. Fist pumping,

0:38:52.200 --> 0:38:55.680
<v Speaker 5>I hate you said that. A favorite that she revisited recently,

0:38:55.719 --> 0:38:59.080
<v Speaker 5>Twelve Angry Men, a random film she loves, Scorsese's After

0:38:59.160 --> 0:39:02.400
<v Speaker 5>Hours movie she credits with becoming a sinophile. I think

0:39:02.600 --> 0:39:04.520
<v Speaker 5>this is one for a lot of people out there.

0:39:04.600 --> 0:39:08.320
<v Speaker 5>Cinema Paradiso, and a book about movies that she loves,

0:39:08.920 --> 0:39:12.520
<v Speaker 5>Get Happy, The Life of Judy Garland. Thank you, Susie

0:39:12.520 --> 0:39:14.080
<v Speaker 5>for being part of the family and for all those

0:39:14.160 --> 0:39:16.440
<v Speaker 5>years of listening. In addition to keeping us doing what

0:39:16.440 --> 0:39:18.680
<v Speaker 5>we're doing. Your support comes with perks. You get to

0:39:18.719 --> 0:39:21.520
<v Speaker 5>listen early in ad free, you get our weekly newsletter,

0:39:21.640 --> 0:39:24.279
<v Speaker 5>you get exclusive opportunities like being part of the Film

0:39:24.280 --> 0:39:27.280
<v Speaker 5>Spotting Family discord, and you get access to our monthly

0:39:27.320 --> 0:39:29.920
<v Speaker 5>bonus shows. We did just drop in the feed our

0:39:30.040 --> 0:39:34.400
<v Speaker 5>quarterly Film Spotting Advisory Board meeting and coming very soon

0:39:34.719 --> 0:39:39.400
<v Speaker 5>the May bonus show that we just recorded our draft

0:39:39.760 --> 0:39:45.000
<v Speaker 5>with Madness Bracket contest winner Ricky Kendall, directors who are

0:39:45.040 --> 0:39:47.440
<v Speaker 5>no longer with us, which was a blast.

0:39:47.440 --> 0:39:48.120
<v Speaker 3>A lot of fun.

0:39:48.320 --> 0:39:51.759
<v Speaker 7>I think we mostly came away happy everyone, all of us.

0:39:51.920 --> 0:39:52.959
<v Speaker 3>I feel like a.

0:39:52.880 --> 0:39:54.920
<v Speaker 7>Recent draft went that way too. We've got to pick

0:39:54.920 --> 0:39:57.759
<v Speaker 7>a more contentious topic for our next drive, maybe so

0:39:57.800 --> 0:39:58.799
<v Speaker 7>we get some anger going.

0:39:59.200 --> 0:40:01.280
<v Speaker 5>You can learn more about joining the Film Spotting Family

0:40:01.360 --> 0:40:04.560
<v Speaker 5>at Filmspotting Family dot com.

0:40:05.120 --> 0:40:10.320
<v Speaker 3>Our lives are the sum of our choices. This is

0:40:10.360 --> 0:40:13.520
<v Speaker 3>we're calling your destiny.

0:40:14.840 --> 0:40:20.440
<v Speaker 5>I have no regret ansession you. That's from the trailer

0:40:20.520 --> 0:40:24.320
<v Speaker 5>for Mission Impossible, the Final Reckoning, which comes to theaters

0:40:24.360 --> 0:40:27.120
<v Speaker 5>this weekend. We do plan to have a review of

0:40:27.120 --> 0:40:29.920
<v Speaker 5>that on next week's show, but not with you, Josh,

0:40:29.920 --> 0:40:32.920
<v Speaker 5>because you will be off in Japan with your lovely

0:40:33.640 --> 0:40:36.800
<v Speaker 5>bride of how many years at this point are you

0:40:36.920 --> 0:40:37.399
<v Speaker 5>here to share?

0:40:38.120 --> 0:40:40.680
<v Speaker 7>I mean it long enough that it sounds very strange

0:40:40.680 --> 0:40:42.239
<v Speaker 7>for you to say bride, But yes, I don't.

0:40:42.400 --> 0:40:43.960
<v Speaker 5>That's why I asked you to clarify.

0:40:44.239 --> 0:40:47.160
<v Speaker 7>Debbie and I have been married for thirty years. So

0:40:47.200 --> 0:40:52.760
<v Speaker 7>we're doing it big and spending about two weeks in Japan. Really, Actually,

0:40:52.760 --> 0:40:54.440
<v Speaker 7>the truth is I was not allowed to be on

0:40:54.440 --> 0:40:57.480
<v Speaker 7>this show because I really strongly disliked the Final Reckoning.

0:40:57.719 --> 0:40:59.560
<v Speaker 5>I was going to say, you have a reckoning with

0:40:59.719 --> 0:41:02.360
<v Speaker 5>this installment of the Mission Impossible franchise.

0:41:02.520 --> 0:41:05.440
<v Speaker 3>I hope, I hope. You know it seems mixed.

0:41:05.480 --> 0:41:08.160
<v Speaker 7>So I'm hoping either you or Michael do go for

0:41:08.280 --> 0:41:11.080
<v Speaker 7>it and have a good debate about it, because I

0:41:11.080 --> 0:41:12.759
<v Speaker 7>know there are big fans of the series that this

0:41:12.800 --> 0:41:14.200
<v Speaker 7>one did still work for.

0:41:14.560 --> 0:41:17.040
<v Speaker 5>We will see. My guest host will be Michael Phillips

0:41:17.040 --> 0:41:20.040
<v Speaker 5>from the Chicago Tribune. Along with a review of The

0:41:20.040 --> 0:41:22.920
<v Speaker 5>Final Reckoning, we will share our top five movie stunts.

0:41:22.960 --> 0:41:25.400
<v Speaker 5>That's a tie in with the Mi films, of course,

0:41:25.440 --> 0:41:28.320
<v Speaker 5>but also with the recent ish announcement that the Oscars

0:41:28.320 --> 0:41:31.759
<v Speaker 5>will be including a best Stunt category starting with the

0:41:31.840 --> 0:41:35.839
<v Speaker 5>twenty twenty eight ceremony. Here's where I'm at, Josh, right now.

0:41:36.440 --> 0:41:40.080
<v Speaker 5>I recently posted in the film Spotting discord what is

0:41:40.120 --> 0:41:44.000
<v Speaker 5>a movie stunt? What qualifies learn? Are the parameters?

0:41:44.320 --> 0:41:44.719
<v Speaker 3>Oh man?

0:41:44.719 --> 0:41:46.080
<v Speaker 5>Are their technicalities?

0:41:46.239 --> 0:41:47.920
<v Speaker 7>You're lost in the weeds already.

0:41:48.400 --> 0:41:49.920
<v Speaker 5>I'm already lost in the weeds.

0:41:50.320 --> 0:41:50.480
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:41:51.280 --> 0:41:54.879
<v Speaker 5>Does it have to be a human who's involved? Are

0:41:54.920 --> 0:41:57.440
<v Speaker 5>we allowed to think of them as stunt sequences? Or

0:41:57.520 --> 0:42:01.200
<v Speaker 5>is it a single event? It's tough.

0:42:01.320 --> 0:42:02.840
<v Speaker 7>You're gonna have to get back to me on that,

0:42:03.080 --> 0:42:05.080
<v Speaker 7>or I'll just listen on my flight back.

0:42:05.440 --> 0:42:06.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:42:06.320 --> 0:42:08.920
<v Speaker 5>Also, next week, results from the current Film Spotting poll.

0:42:09.120 --> 0:42:12.000
<v Speaker 5>We're asking you to choose the single greatest actor or

0:42:12.080 --> 0:42:16.919
<v Speaker 5>actress from the last twenty five years currently in the lead.

0:42:17.840 --> 0:42:20.799
<v Speaker 5>Apparently people were swayed by my choice the number one

0:42:20.920 --> 0:42:24.520
<v Speaker 5>overall pick from our draft of the actors of the Century.

0:42:25.440 --> 0:42:27.640
<v Speaker 5>You can vote in that poll and leave a comment

0:42:27.719 --> 0:42:29.960
<v Speaker 5>at film spotting dot net, and if you would like

0:42:30.000 --> 0:42:32.920
<v Speaker 5>to check out our schedule of future shows, visit filmspotting

0:42:32.960 --> 0:42:36.240
<v Speaker 5>dot net slash episodes. Josh, you're out for two weeks.

0:42:36.320 --> 0:42:38.759
<v Speaker 5>You're also going to have a meetup with a good

0:42:38.760 --> 0:42:41.399
<v Speaker 5>group of film Spotting listeners in Japan, which will set

0:42:41.400 --> 0:42:46.080
<v Speaker 5>the record for the farthest flung film spotting meetup congract.

0:42:46.160 --> 0:42:48.839
<v Speaker 7>Wait, yeah, it's gonna be in Tokyo and we have

0:42:49.000 --> 0:42:51.520
<v Speaker 7>I thought, what are the chances do we have anyone there?

0:42:51.920 --> 0:42:54.400
<v Speaker 7>At least ten folks have signed up to join us,

0:42:54.400 --> 0:42:57.520
<v Speaker 7>So yeah, we'll definitely be reporting back on that or

0:42:57.600 --> 0:42:59.480
<v Speaker 7>follow us both on Instagram and I'll be sure to

0:42:59.480 --> 0:43:00.800
<v Speaker 7>put up some pictures.

0:43:00.960 --> 0:43:03.040
<v Speaker 5>If you go to film Spotting dot Net slash episodes,

0:43:03.120 --> 0:43:05.880
<v Speaker 5>you'll see that after Michael, Aisha Harris is going to

0:43:05.920 --> 0:43:09.080
<v Speaker 5>join the show really fun show plan with her Clueless

0:43:09.080 --> 0:43:11.880
<v Speaker 5>for its thirtieth anniversary, and our top five movie quotes.

0:43:12.239 --> 0:43:15.880
<v Speaker 5>Movie quotes in our lexicon like the phrases that we

0:43:15.960 --> 0:43:19.719
<v Speaker 5>actually use or have used regularly in our lives. So

0:43:20.440 --> 0:43:22.600
<v Speaker 5>it might be a lot of inside jokes and we'll

0:43:22.640 --> 0:43:25.000
<v Speaker 5>just look at each other with blank faces like we

0:43:25.040 --> 0:43:26.200
<v Speaker 5>don't know what you're referencing.

0:43:26.320 --> 0:43:28.600
<v Speaker 7>We'll see your family's and close friends will get a

0:43:28.640 --> 0:43:30.040
<v Speaker 7>kick out of it, so that's all that matters.

0:43:30.080 --> 0:43:34.080
<v Speaker 5>That's exactly right. Again, that's Film Spotting dot Net Slash Episodes.

0:43:34.480 --> 0:43:36.919
<v Speaker 7>Quick note about our sister podcast, The Next Picture Show

0:43:36.960 --> 0:43:40.399
<v Speaker 7>looking at cinemas present via its past. It is part

0:43:40.480 --> 0:43:44.760
<v Speaker 7>two of their Less than Hero pairings. So they're discussing

0:43:44.760 --> 0:43:47.759
<v Speaker 7>the latest MCU installment, which is getting been getting pretty

0:43:47.760 --> 0:43:52.799
<v Speaker 7>good reviews Thunderbolts. Previously they discussed nineteen ninety nine's Mystery Men,

0:43:52.960 --> 0:43:55.680
<v Speaker 7>so they'll really do some of the compared and contrasting

0:43:55.800 --> 0:43:59.360
<v Speaker 7>on this new latest episode. You can find those every

0:43:59.520 --> 0:44:03.520
<v Speaker 7>Tuesday wherever you get your podcasts. Time now for Massacre Theater,

0:44:03.600 --> 0:44:05.839
<v Speaker 7>where we perform a scene and you get a chance

0:44:05.880 --> 0:44:09.840
<v Speaker 7>to win a film spotting prize. Last time we massacred.

0:44:09.480 --> 0:44:12.360
<v Speaker 3>This scene, I believe the most likely outcome will be

0:44:12.360 --> 0:44:15.200
<v Speaker 3>our collective demise, not if we strictly follow the rules

0:44:15.200 --> 0:44:15.760
<v Speaker 3>of time travel.

0:44:16.520 --> 0:44:19.520
<v Speaker 10>It means no talking to our past selves, no betting

0:44:19.600 --> 0:44:20.400
<v Speaker 10>on sporting events.

0:44:20.440 --> 0:44:22.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna stop you right there, Scott.

0:44:23.440 --> 0:44:25.919
<v Speaker 10>Are you seriously telling me that your plan to save

0:44:25.960 --> 0:44:27.560
<v Speaker 10>the universe is based on.

0:44:27.560 --> 0:44:31.919
<v Speaker 3>Back to the future? No good.

0:44:31.960 --> 0:44:34.440
<v Speaker 1>You have me worried there, because I'd be worship That's not.

0:44:34.400 --> 0:44:38.040
<v Speaker 3>How quantum physics works, Tony.

0:44:38.200 --> 0:44:39.640
<v Speaker 11>We have to take a stand.

0:44:40.320 --> 0:44:44.759
<v Speaker 10>We did stand, and yet here we are. I know

0:44:44.840 --> 0:44:47.040
<v Speaker 10>you got a lot on the line, got a wife,

0:44:47.480 --> 0:44:50.759
<v Speaker 10>a daughter, but I lost someone very important to me,

0:44:51.840 --> 0:44:55.200
<v Speaker 10>A lot of people did, and now now we have

0:44:55.280 --> 0:44:57.799
<v Speaker 10>a chance to bring her back, to bring everyone back.

0:44:57.840 --> 0:44:59.480
<v Speaker 1>And you're telling me that you won't need this, right.

0:44:59.440 --> 0:45:03.040
<v Speaker 7>Scot, I will speaking of the MCU that was Robert

0:45:03.040 --> 0:45:05.719
<v Speaker 7>Downey Junior and Paul Rudd, as well as a few

0:45:05.760 --> 0:45:08.439
<v Speaker 7>others who we didn't perform. The scene comes from twenty

0:45:08.520 --> 0:45:13.200
<v Speaker 7>nineteen's Avengers Endgame, written by Stephen mcpheeley and Christopher Marcus,

0:45:13.200 --> 0:45:15.400
<v Speaker 7>directed by Anthony and Joe Russo.

0:45:15.640 --> 0:45:18.040
<v Speaker 5>That massacre was part of our Top twenty five Films

0:45:18.040 --> 0:45:20.640
<v Speaker 5>of the Century show a couple of weeks back. Endgame

0:45:20.760 --> 0:45:22.880
<v Speaker 5>did not make either of our lists. In fact, not

0:45:22.920 --> 0:45:26.319
<v Speaker 5>a single MCU film made our list. Josh, so, why

0:45:26.360 --> 0:45:28.920
<v Speaker 5>that scene? Well, of course, listeners have answers.

0:45:29.120 --> 0:45:33.080
<v Speaker 7>Here's Dylan dom in Blair, Nebraska, the highest grossing movie

0:45:33.080 --> 0:45:35.239
<v Speaker 7>of the century, paired with the best.

0:45:35.200 --> 0:45:38.600
<v Speaker 5>Robert Gibbons in Kaysville, Utah. Has a good answer. The

0:45:38.600 --> 0:45:41.319
<v Speaker 5>connections are one, it is the top grossing or one

0:45:41.320 --> 0:45:43.440
<v Speaker 5>of the top grossing movies in the last twenty five years,

0:45:43.719 --> 0:45:45.919
<v Speaker 5>which ties into your best of lists. Yeah, And two

0:45:46.280 --> 0:45:48.000
<v Speaker 5>you found a way to bring back the movies that

0:45:48.040 --> 0:45:51.120
<v Speaker 5>were destroyed in film spotting Madness, just like the Avengers

0:45:51.120 --> 0:45:53.480
<v Speaker 5>brought back the people snapped by Thanos.

0:45:53.760 --> 0:45:57.360
<v Speaker 7>Indeed, here's Addison Alley from Salt Lake City, Utah time heist.

0:45:57.920 --> 0:46:01.200
<v Speaker 7>I am expecting a brimming infinity go let of answers

0:46:01.200 --> 0:46:04.040
<v Speaker 7>for this Avengers Endgame scene, a movie that was actually

0:46:04.080 --> 0:46:06.880
<v Speaker 7>so good for its time that it retroactively made people

0:46:06.920 --> 0:46:10.320
<v Speaker 7>believe the MCU had been nothing but masterpieces before that point,

0:46:10.520 --> 0:46:14.520
<v Speaker 7>and prospectively mediocre and terrible. The charm of scene massive

0:46:14.560 --> 0:46:17.160
<v Speaker 7>Superhero team ups has since faded, But g boy, howdy

0:46:17.239 --> 0:46:18.800
<v Speaker 7>did this work in twenty nineteen?

0:46:19.239 --> 0:46:22.359
<v Speaker 5>And here's Michael Rosch in New York, New York. Of course,

0:46:22.400 --> 0:46:25.320
<v Speaker 5>the scene is from that obscure little film Avengers Endgame,

0:46:25.360 --> 0:46:28.040
<v Speaker 5>the tie in besides the obvious oversight that kept the

0:46:28.080 --> 0:46:30.840
<v Speaker 5>film off. Both Adam and Josh's Top twenty five of

0:46:30.880 --> 0:46:34.040
<v Speaker 5>the last twenty five years include the MCU's own meta

0:46:34.080 --> 0:46:36.920
<v Speaker 5>look back. Also, Downey Junior won an Oscar last year

0:46:36.960 --> 0:46:39.239
<v Speaker 5>for a film by Christopher Nolan, a director who showed

0:46:39.280 --> 0:46:41.440
<v Speaker 5>up on both of your lists. I also believe you

0:46:41.520 --> 0:46:44.640
<v Speaker 5>renamed Scott Lang Peter as a nod to Paul Rudd

0:46:44.680 --> 0:46:47.560
<v Speaker 5>being in the newer Ghostbusters films. Peter, of course, was

0:46:47.600 --> 0:46:50.200
<v Speaker 5>Bill Murray's character, and you opened the show on a

0:46:50.280 --> 0:46:55.000
<v Speaker 5>Murray monologue from Lost in Translation. Funny that didn't we

0:46:55.040 --> 0:46:57.360
<v Speaker 5>go with Peter because we were just thinking about I

0:46:57.400 --> 0:46:57.959
<v Speaker 5>love you man.

0:46:58.920 --> 0:47:02.240
<v Speaker 7>I think that's a and Spider Man and Peter Parker.

0:47:02.480 --> 0:47:04.560
<v Speaker 7>But but yeah, this works just as well.

0:47:04.840 --> 0:47:07.880
<v Speaker 5>That works actually the best. We'll go with that, Michael.

0:47:07.960 --> 0:47:10.600
<v Speaker 5>Thank you. Josh, go ahead and reach into that pretty

0:47:10.600 --> 0:47:13.760
<v Speaker 5>brimming film Spotting hat and pick out this week's winner.

0:47:14.200 --> 0:47:18.359
<v Speaker 7>Our winner is Dave Allen from Parts Unknown, who yeah

0:47:18.600 --> 0:47:21.640
<v Speaker 7>joins in with the Thunderbolts praise, saying here, I'm not

0:47:21.640 --> 0:47:23.759
<v Speaker 7>sure if you guys are planning to watch a review Thunderbolts,

0:47:23.760 --> 0:47:26.880
<v Speaker 7>but I think it's the best Marvel movie since shan Che.

0:47:27.160 --> 0:47:29.160
<v Speaker 5>How about that, Dave. We don't know where you're from,

0:47:29.360 --> 0:47:32.520
<v Speaker 5>but we will if you send us your address, get

0:47:32.560 --> 0:47:35.480
<v Speaker 5>you a film Spotting t shirt or a film Spotting

0:47:35.480 --> 0:47:38.800
<v Speaker 5>tote bag, or a trial membership to the Film Spotting Family.

0:47:39.080 --> 0:47:41.239
<v Speaker 5>Email us feedback at film spotting dot net.

0:47:43.960 --> 0:47:44.960
<v Speaker 3>How did I come to this?

0:47:45.400 --> 0:47:45.920
<v Speaker 10>Not again?

0:47:47.880 --> 0:47:54.719
<v Speaker 3>Five natural one? Look at me? I want to say

0:47:54.760 --> 0:47:57.200
<v Speaker 3>that stupid line one more time.

0:47:57.880 --> 0:48:00.000
<v Speaker 5>We move on now to this week's edition of Massacre

0:48:00.080 --> 0:48:02.480
<v Speaker 5>or a Theater. I'm gonna give everybody a hint, because

0:48:02.480 --> 0:48:04.200
<v Speaker 5>I don't think the hat's going to be very brimming.

0:48:05.680 --> 0:48:08.040
<v Speaker 5>We're apparently obsessed with this movie here on Bone Spot.

0:48:09.200 --> 0:48:10.239
<v Speaker 5>I'm just gonna leave it out.

0:48:10.920 --> 0:48:13.640
<v Speaker 7>In a little last minute research, we appear to have

0:48:13.800 --> 0:48:15.960
<v Speaker 7>done a scene from this film about a year ago.

0:48:16.280 --> 0:48:18.440
<v Speaker 3>So there's a clue for you.

0:48:19.239 --> 0:48:21.440
<v Speaker 7>We didn't discuss this beforehand, but we need to swap

0:48:21.560 --> 0:48:23.720
<v Speaker 7>in a name here in your last line.

0:48:24.680 --> 0:48:27.000
<v Speaker 3>Do we want to go with?

0:48:27.719 --> 0:48:28.239
<v Speaker 5>I got one?

0:48:28.480 --> 0:48:30.560
<v Speaker 3>Okay, you got one? All right, We're gonna go surprise

0:48:30.680 --> 0:48:30.960
<v Speaker 3>me there.

0:48:31.360 --> 0:48:37.839
<v Speaker 5>I think I think that this is potentially another hint

0:48:39.040 --> 0:48:41.040
<v Speaker 5>if people are really paying attention, I.

0:48:41.120 --> 0:48:43.360
<v Speaker 7>Was actually going to suggest the same thing, okay, on

0:48:43.440 --> 0:48:45.440
<v Speaker 7>the same page, on the same page there, and also here,

0:48:45.480 --> 0:48:48.640
<v Speaker 7>I'll give another hint. If you have already listened or

0:48:48.719 --> 0:48:53.080
<v Speaker 7>will soon listen to our film spoting family bonus episode

0:48:54.000 --> 0:48:59.040
<v Speaker 7>about a draft of dead directors. This title, I believe

0:48:59.160 --> 0:49:02.440
<v Speaker 7>is mentioned the film. Your absolute comes up quite a bit.

0:49:02.520 --> 0:49:05.440
<v Speaker 7>We'll say that, okay, okay, I think we'll hopefully we've

0:49:05.520 --> 0:49:08.440
<v Speaker 7>dropped enough our performances will be of no help at all.

0:49:08.560 --> 0:49:10.600
<v Speaker 5>They will be of no help. And I am going

0:49:10.680 --> 0:49:12.680
<v Speaker 5>to point out that I have once again been typecast.

0:49:13.320 --> 0:49:17.320
<v Speaker 3>I mean this that or it's your your strength. Well, no,

0:49:17.440 --> 0:49:18.960
<v Speaker 3>it's not your strength. We could just you're just.

0:49:19.440 --> 0:49:22.600
<v Speaker 5>We could go with that. Okay, I'm gonna start it off.

0:49:22.640 --> 0:49:27.320
<v Speaker 5>You're gonna give me the action and action. Oh but

0:49:27.480 --> 0:49:31.040
<v Speaker 5>you have that look, dear, I can always tell now

0:49:31.239 --> 0:49:35.759
<v Speaker 5>you haven't been doing anything foolish. M m, well, I

0:49:35.880 --> 0:49:38.359
<v Speaker 5>do hope you've forgotten all about that silly little plan

0:49:38.480 --> 0:49:42.839
<v Speaker 5>of yours, which one about blowing up the White House.

0:49:43.480 --> 0:49:46.640
<v Speaker 7>Oh ma, I was only fooling. Besides, what would the

0:49:46.719 --> 0:49:47.439
<v Speaker 7>president say?

0:49:48.360 --> 0:49:53.479
<v Speaker 5>You're a naughty boy, Sasha. You can always make me laugh.

0:49:55.880 --> 0:49:57.879
<v Speaker 5>Now get shaved before your father gets home.

0:49:59.000 --> 0:50:04.279
<v Speaker 3>Wow, and see, man, I don't know it is.

0:50:04.480 --> 0:50:06.720
<v Speaker 5>Maybe it is a position of strength.

0:50:06.920 --> 0:50:10.560
<v Speaker 7>If you add giggling, I think it becomes a position

0:50:10.680 --> 0:50:11.080
<v Speaker 7>of strength.

0:50:11.440 --> 0:50:14.080
<v Speaker 5>Nicely do if you know what film we just massacred,

0:50:14.280 --> 0:50:16.600
<v Speaker 5>email the movie's title and your name on location to

0:50:16.640 --> 0:50:19.960
<v Speaker 5>feedback at film spotting dot net. The deadline is Monday,

0:50:20.040 --> 0:50:23.720
<v Speaker 5>junifverse Robert Downey Junior last week, This this week, range

0:50:25.040 --> 0:50:28.000
<v Speaker 5>course the winner randomly from all the correct entries and

0:50:28.040 --> 0:50:29.560
<v Speaker 5>announce it in a couple of weeks.

0:50:31.520 --> 0:50:39.239
<v Speaker 2>Ring ring, ring, Ring, Ring, ring, Pick up, pick up

0:50:39.280 --> 0:50:48.920
<v Speaker 2>the phone. Hello, Hello, ven Selina, Seva bien et.

0:50:51.760 --> 0:50:52.480
<v Speaker 5>Shows that quiet.

0:50:54.320 --> 0:50:55.960
<v Speaker 10>I've been working on my English recently.

0:50:56.160 --> 0:50:57.040
<v Speaker 4>You want to talk in English?

0:50:57.239 --> 0:50:57.759
<v Speaker 6>Just for laughs?

0:50:58.280 --> 0:50:59.799
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, okay, that's a good idea.

0:51:02.360 --> 0:51:03.719
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I'm going to be able to make

0:51:03.760 --> 0:51:04.439
<v Speaker 1>it for lunch today.

0:51:04.600 --> 0:51:07.880
<v Speaker 7>Selene and Jesse again, this time in nineteen ninety five's

0:51:08.000 --> 0:51:12.320
<v Speaker 7>before Sunrise. We revisited Sunrise just back in March. That

0:51:12.600 --> 0:51:16.160
<v Speaker 7>was part of Film Spotting Fest. We closed out those

0:51:16.200 --> 0:51:19.360
<v Speaker 7>wonderful three days Adam with a sold out Sunday morning

0:51:19.600 --> 0:51:23.960
<v Speaker 7>screening at Chicago's Music Box, and then after the screening,

0:51:24.280 --> 0:51:27.640
<v Speaker 7>we hauled ourselves back up on stage. You and I

0:51:27.800 --> 0:51:31.600
<v Speaker 7>were quite exhausted, but we leaned on producer Sam and

0:51:31.960 --> 0:51:35.600
<v Speaker 7>critic and friends Scott Tobias to talk about the film.

0:51:36.160 --> 0:51:37.360
<v Speaker 3>Here is that audio.

0:51:39.640 --> 0:51:43.239
<v Speaker 5>We're excited to have Scott Tobias, our friend from the

0:51:43.320 --> 0:51:46.960
<v Speaker 5>Next Picture Show podcast and from the Reveal, joining us

0:51:47.040 --> 0:51:49.520
<v Speaker 5>to talk about, as you heard, one of my all

0:51:49.600 --> 0:51:52.560
<v Speaker 5>time favorite movies before Sunday. Scott, thanks for joining.

0:51:52.440 --> 0:51:54.279
<v Speaker 2>Us thanks for having me. This is great.

0:51:54.320 --> 0:51:56.239
<v Speaker 12>And look at all these people stick it around for

0:51:56.320 --> 0:51:57.840
<v Speaker 12>your Q and I like a bunch of sickos.

0:51:58.000 --> 0:51:58.200
<v Speaker 3>Yep.

0:52:00.000 --> 0:52:02.440
<v Speaker 5>Funny I mentioned Friday Night with Ryan Johnson. You know

0:52:02.520 --> 0:52:04.200
<v Speaker 5>how Brick is one of these films where it's all

0:52:04.239 --> 0:52:06.200
<v Speaker 5>taking place in high school and there's one cell phone

0:52:06.280 --> 0:52:09.319
<v Speaker 5>in the movie, and how different the movie would be. Now,

0:52:09.520 --> 0:52:12.080
<v Speaker 5>this is the ultimate pre cell phone movie, right, pre

0:52:12.200 --> 0:52:13.120
<v Speaker 5>social media film.

0:52:13.400 --> 0:52:14.880
<v Speaker 12>I think you'd have to in order to I was

0:52:14.920 --> 0:52:16.800
<v Speaker 12>thinking about that, and I think the only way to

0:52:16.840 --> 0:52:19.440
<v Speaker 12>make it work is if they both somehow drop their

0:52:19.560 --> 0:52:22.040
<v Speaker 12>cell phones into the Danube, and then I think maybe

0:52:22.480 --> 0:52:23.359
<v Speaker 12>you could have this work.

0:52:23.480 --> 0:52:25.680
<v Speaker 7>You do wonder how do the kids meet these days?

0:52:25.880 --> 0:52:28.080
<v Speaker 7>Like if they don't carry around books that you can say,

0:52:28.120 --> 0:52:30.520
<v Speaker 7>what are you reading? It's like what are you looking

0:52:30.560 --> 0:52:32.480
<v Speaker 7>at on your phone while someone's dancing?

0:52:32.560 --> 0:52:33.759
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you know, hey, yeah.

0:52:34.239 --> 0:52:36.479
<v Speaker 5>So, before we dive into the movie a little bit further,

0:52:37.200 --> 0:52:41.000
<v Speaker 5>we've been talking to all of our guests about kind

0:52:41.000 --> 0:52:42.680
<v Speaker 5>of this is the twentieth year of the show, right,

0:52:42.719 --> 0:52:45.160
<v Speaker 5>so reflecting a little bit and want to share with

0:52:45.200 --> 0:52:49.400
<v Speaker 5>the audience our relationship actually to you, Scott, and I

0:52:49.400 --> 0:52:52.160
<v Speaker 5>guess we'll get it a little bit, your relationship to us,

0:52:52.280 --> 0:52:54.960
<v Speaker 5>but your tenure with the AV Club give us the

0:52:55.040 --> 0:52:56.280
<v Speaker 5>years just so we can kind.

0:52:56.160 --> 0:53:03.120
<v Speaker 12>Of I met my longtime partner and friend and editor

0:53:03.520 --> 0:53:08.440
<v Speaker 12>and current cohort Keith Phipps in nineteen ninety seven at

0:53:08.480 --> 0:53:12.480
<v Speaker 12>a junket for Goodwill Hunting and Scream two. I was

0:53:12.560 --> 0:53:16.200
<v Speaker 12>in college graduate school, and he was working for the

0:53:16.280 --> 0:53:18.560
<v Speaker 12>AV Club. He was part of what was a skeleton

0:53:18.680 --> 0:53:21.520
<v Speaker 12>crew of three at the time, working out of Madison,

0:53:21.600 --> 0:53:24.480
<v Speaker 12>and they were just starting up the Chicago edition and

0:53:24.880 --> 0:53:26.920
<v Speaker 12>needed somebody to do the local part of that. I

0:53:27.000 --> 0:53:29.239
<v Speaker 12>did not get that job, but I did start freelancing for.

0:53:29.280 --> 0:53:31.600
<v Speaker 2>Them, and they came up in nineteen ninety nine.

0:53:31.880 --> 0:53:34.920
<v Speaker 12>Was there I think until two thousand and twelve or

0:53:34.920 --> 0:53:37.200
<v Speaker 12>twenty and fourteen, I can't remember. And then we started

0:53:37.239 --> 0:53:39.759
<v Speaker 12>the Dissolve together, which lasted for a couple of years

0:53:39.760 --> 0:53:42.400
<v Speaker 12>through Pitchfork and now we have The Reveal, which is

0:53:42.480 --> 0:53:43.040
<v Speaker 12>their newsletter.

0:53:43.200 --> 0:53:43.359
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:53:43.400 --> 0:53:45.279
<v Speaker 5>So between ninety seven and two thousand and five when

0:53:45.320 --> 0:53:47.840
<v Speaker 5>our show started, all three of us are reading the

0:53:47.920 --> 0:53:51.960
<v Speaker 5>AV Club, reading Keith reading Tasha Robinson reading you, and

0:53:52.080 --> 0:53:54.280
<v Speaker 5>we're thinking about, man if we could ever get guests

0:53:54.320 --> 0:53:55.880
<v Speaker 5>on the show. Would we ever get a guy like

0:53:55.920 --> 0:53:59.520
<v Speaker 5>Scott Tobias to pay attention to us? Honestly, that what

0:53:59.600 --> 0:54:02.479
<v Speaker 5>we thought undred percent, And I think you were maybe

0:54:02.560 --> 0:54:06.360
<v Speaker 5>the second ever guest host that we had. You actually

0:54:06.440 --> 0:54:08.239
<v Speaker 5>said yes and came on the show, but even before that,

0:54:08.600 --> 0:54:10.640
<v Speaker 5>you listened to the show to decide whether or not

0:54:10.840 --> 0:54:12.640
<v Speaker 5>you thought it was worth it, and then you wrote

0:54:12.680 --> 0:54:14.520
<v Speaker 5>something very lovely about us in the av Club that

0:54:14.560 --> 0:54:16.799
<v Speaker 5>we had no idea was coming, but for us back

0:54:16.840 --> 0:54:19.480
<v Speaker 5>in six whenever it was, it was very validating. So

0:54:19.560 --> 0:54:20.480
<v Speaker 5>thank you. It was.

0:54:20.640 --> 0:54:23.600
<v Speaker 12>It was great, and I have to say you reached

0:54:23.640 --> 0:54:25.080
<v Speaker 12>out to me at first, I think when it was

0:54:25.200 --> 0:54:28.040
<v Speaker 12>cinecast and I was like, what is this I'm not

0:54:28.120 --> 0:54:31.320
<v Speaker 12>gonna do, And so it was, you know, just a

0:54:31.400 --> 0:54:33.600
<v Speaker 12>matter of you listening to the show and being completely

0:54:34.160 --> 0:54:37.520
<v Speaker 12>blown away by how good the discussion was, the quality

0:54:37.560 --> 0:54:41.040
<v Speaker 12>of the production, the quality of the insight, and of

0:54:41.120 --> 0:54:43.719
<v Speaker 12>course it was something I was happy to recommend and

0:54:43.800 --> 0:54:46.480
<v Speaker 12>then join for as a guest episode about Knocked Up.

0:54:46.560 --> 0:54:47.239
<v Speaker 2>I believe was what we.

0:54:47.320 --> 0:54:50.759
<v Speaker 5>Thought right, Sam was off you join joined me for

0:54:51.120 --> 0:54:53.640
<v Speaker 5>that one twenty fifth anniversary. We'll sit down and have

0:54:53.680 --> 0:54:56.440
<v Speaker 5>a conversation. We'll devote an entire panel just to the

0:54:56.560 --> 0:54:58.520
<v Speaker 5>legal dispute that caused us to change our name to

0:54:58.560 --> 0:55:00.800
<v Speaker 5>film Spotting, because I know everyone dying to hear that.

0:55:00.880 --> 0:55:03.880
<v Speaker 5>But yes, we did start as sinecaster first one hundred episodes,

0:55:03.960 --> 0:55:07.920
<v Speaker 5>so before Sunrise. What was your relationship to it at

0:55:07.960 --> 0:55:10.840
<v Speaker 5>the time that came out. Tell us about your first experience.

0:55:10.840 --> 0:55:14.000
<v Speaker 12>It's really kind of perfect because I am the same

0:55:14.120 --> 0:55:16.840
<v Speaker 12>age as the characters in the movie. I think Selene

0:55:16.880 --> 0:55:19.160
<v Speaker 12>says she's twenty three. I think that would have been

0:55:19.200 --> 0:55:22.080
<v Speaker 12>when I saw it. I was one year out of school.

0:55:22.160 --> 0:55:24.840
<v Speaker 12>It was kind of towny at that point in Athens, Georgia,

0:55:25.239 --> 0:55:28.720
<v Speaker 12>and I saw the movie at a screening at college,

0:55:28.800 --> 0:55:31.279
<v Speaker 12>like at college screening, and at the time link latter

0:55:31.520 --> 0:55:36.120
<v Speaker 12>was extremely exciting. This was, you know, because yes, Slacker

0:55:36.160 --> 0:55:38.840
<v Speaker 12>had come out while I was an undergrad, like it

0:55:38.920 --> 0:55:39.719
<v Speaker 12>was ninety three.

0:55:40.040 --> 0:55:41.239
<v Speaker 2>Was days to confused.

0:55:42.200 --> 0:55:45.080
<v Speaker 12>You didn't mention, of course, I wasn't aware of his

0:55:45.520 --> 0:55:47.400
<v Speaker 12>actual first film, which is what the uh?

0:55:47.920 --> 0:55:50.160
<v Speaker 2>You can't learn to plow by reading books.

0:55:50.840 --> 0:55:53.400
<v Speaker 12>But in any case, I was a bit of a

0:55:53.680 --> 0:55:57.760
<v Speaker 12>ethan hawk skeptic at the time, but I was completely

0:55:58.680 --> 0:56:01.560
<v Speaker 12>wowed by the movie and extremely moved by it, and

0:56:02.000 --> 0:56:04.719
<v Speaker 12>I remain so this was powerful to see, and it's

0:56:04.800 --> 0:56:08.839
<v Speaker 12>extraordinary to me that the sequels exists. That was one

0:56:08.840 --> 0:56:10.480
<v Speaker 12>of those people where it was like, Oh, there's going

0:56:10.520 --> 0:56:13.239
<v Speaker 12>to be another Before Sunrise movie.

0:56:13.640 --> 0:56:15.360
<v Speaker 2>I think ten years later I was like, no, what

0:56:15.440 --> 0:56:15.839
<v Speaker 2>are you doing.

0:56:15.920 --> 0:56:17.120
<v Speaker 3>This is a horrible idea.

0:56:17.200 --> 0:56:18.440
<v Speaker 12>Then, of course it turns out to it was not

0:56:18.480 --> 0:56:20.759
<v Speaker 12>a horrible if anything, if anything at least is going

0:56:20.800 --> 0:56:21.960
<v Speaker 12>to be even better than this one.

0:56:22.040 --> 0:56:25.600
<v Speaker 2>So but I feel like, you know, I've grown with it.

0:56:25.680 --> 0:56:28.680
<v Speaker 2>And one of the things that I really appreciate.

0:56:28.200 --> 0:56:30.480
<v Speaker 12>About the film is that it is such a chronicle

0:56:30.640 --> 0:56:34.520
<v Speaker 12>of a specific moment of a person's life. They have

0:56:34.680 --> 0:56:36.680
<v Speaker 12>to be this age in order to have this kind

0:56:36.680 --> 0:56:39.640
<v Speaker 12>of experience, in order to have that impulse to get

0:56:39.640 --> 0:56:42.080
<v Speaker 12>off the train, in order to really engage not just

0:56:42.520 --> 0:56:42.960
<v Speaker 12>in each.

0:56:42.880 --> 0:56:46.960
<v Speaker 2>Other, but the idea of doing this, I think, is

0:56:47.080 --> 0:56:48.200
<v Speaker 2>very specific.

0:56:47.800 --> 0:56:50.520
<v Speaker 12>To that time and where they are in their lives,

0:56:50.600 --> 0:56:53.600
<v Speaker 12>and this is a film that captures that feeling so intensely.

0:56:54.200 --> 0:56:57.440
<v Speaker 5>I think I just saw it on DVD or VHS,

0:56:57.600 --> 0:56:59.360
<v Speaker 5>maybe even at the time in ninety five, I had

0:56:59.400 --> 0:57:01.399
<v Speaker 5>to wait. It was not coming to my small town

0:57:01.480 --> 0:57:02.200
<v Speaker 5>theater in Iowa.

0:57:02.239 --> 0:57:03.439
<v Speaker 2>What was your experience, guys.

0:57:03.719 --> 0:57:05.799
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, for me, it was definitely a college movie.

0:57:05.880 --> 0:57:07.840
<v Speaker 7>I was in college at the time, so would have

0:57:07.920 --> 0:57:10.960
<v Speaker 7>seen it then, And you don't remember liking it, but

0:57:11.120 --> 0:57:14.520
<v Speaker 7>probably having a little of that hawk skepticism even though

0:57:14.920 --> 0:57:18.000
<v Speaker 7>so reality bites you were saying, Adam was just before,

0:57:18.320 --> 0:57:19.560
<v Speaker 7>right just before.

0:57:19.440 --> 0:57:20.640
<v Speaker 3>And which I liked.

0:57:20.720 --> 0:57:23.760
<v Speaker 7>But it's kind of, you know, you look at him

0:57:23.840 --> 0:57:26.120
<v Speaker 7>kind of like she does in this movie, a little

0:57:26.160 --> 0:57:29.080
<v Speaker 7>askance at first, even though you are mesmerized by what

0:57:29.240 --> 0:57:31.760
<v Speaker 7>he's saying. And so it's probably a movie that I

0:57:31.880 --> 0:57:34.960
<v Speaker 7>warmed up to. But I think that's the right relationship

0:57:35.080 --> 0:57:37.600
<v Speaker 7>to have with this film. As wonderful as it is

0:57:37.760 --> 0:57:42.120
<v Speaker 7>to see at a young age, it's when you're maybe

0:57:42.160 --> 0:57:45.240
<v Speaker 7>a little closer to that couple on the train that

0:57:45.760 --> 0:57:50.200
<v Speaker 7>this movie starts to kind of burrow deeper. And it was,

0:57:50.360 --> 0:57:53.200
<v Speaker 7>you know, maybe not until I don't know, I'm teem

0:57:53.320 --> 0:57:56.120
<v Speaker 7>viewing for when we talked about it. For some maybe

0:57:56.160 --> 0:57:57.600
<v Speaker 7>it was one of those top five lists. I looked

0:57:57.600 --> 0:58:00.720
<v Speaker 7>at it again, Adam, but realizing you, does she know

0:58:01.760 --> 0:58:05.280
<v Speaker 7>when she gets up to move away from them, that

0:58:05.720 --> 0:58:09.280
<v Speaker 7>in twenty years, you know, before midnight, you know that

0:58:09.440 --> 0:58:11.680
<v Speaker 7>she's going to be playing a variation of that scene

0:58:12.080 --> 0:58:14.320
<v Speaker 7>with him. So spoiler sorry for those who are just

0:58:14.360 --> 0:58:16.280
<v Speaker 7>seeing this the first time, like a.

0:58:16.280 --> 0:58:18.720
<v Speaker 5>Love little journey to go on everybody, Yeah, we promise.

0:58:19.080 --> 0:58:21.720
<v Speaker 7>All that to say is it's a movie that's wonderful

0:58:21.760 --> 0:58:24.200
<v Speaker 7>if you see it at you know, thirteen or whatever,

0:58:24.480 --> 0:58:26.919
<v Speaker 7>but you're gonna love it a lot lot more down

0:58:26.960 --> 0:58:27.280
<v Speaker 7>the road.

0:58:27.480 --> 0:58:28.240
<v Speaker 3>When did you see it?

0:58:28.320 --> 0:58:30.680
<v Speaker 1>So, so I would have been twenty. It came out,

0:58:30.680 --> 0:58:33.000
<v Speaker 1>you said, a limited release in the summer, so I

0:58:33.040 --> 0:58:35.120
<v Speaker 1>think I had kind of an ideal viewing. It actually

0:58:35.200 --> 0:58:38.160
<v Speaker 1>did come to the small theater in my town in

0:58:38.280 --> 0:58:41.120
<v Speaker 1>central New Hampshire, in the Lakes region, and probably it

0:58:41.200 --> 0:58:44.760
<v Speaker 1>was a lovely, you know, summer evening, and my mom

0:58:44.800 --> 0:58:49.400
<v Speaker 1>and I went to see it together. So I just

0:58:49.520 --> 0:58:51.480
<v Speaker 1>feel like, you know, what I was thinking is I

0:58:51.600 --> 0:58:53.960
<v Speaker 1>was here, is like, this is a film I've seen

0:58:54.320 --> 0:58:58.520
<v Speaker 1>many times, but something was missing all of you, right,

0:58:58.800 --> 0:59:01.960
<v Speaker 1>just like Delpy says, there was something special about seeing

0:59:02.040 --> 0:59:06.520
<v Speaker 1>it here, deeply moving and of course you can't extract

0:59:06.640 --> 0:59:10.680
<v Speaker 1>this from the entire before enterprise at this point, the

0:59:10.760 --> 0:59:12.760
<v Speaker 1>three films and what they meant. I think the last

0:59:12.800 --> 0:59:14.320
<v Speaker 1>time I saw it was maybe right on the heels

0:59:14.360 --> 0:59:18.520
<v Speaker 1>of midnight, and I was thinking about it before this morning.

0:59:19.240 --> 0:59:22.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, if any of us are in relationships that

0:59:22.840 --> 0:59:26.160
<v Speaker 1>are at all stable, happy, however you want to talk

0:59:26.160 --> 0:59:31.360
<v Speaker 1>about it, maybe the last emotionally risky thing we did

0:59:32.440 --> 0:59:35.640
<v Speaker 1>was initiate that conversation, that first date with the people

0:59:35.680 --> 0:59:39.080
<v Speaker 1>we're still with, right and this movie, and we'll get

0:59:39.120 --> 0:59:41.520
<v Speaker 1>into maybe our favorite moment, so I'll save it next.

0:59:41.600 --> 0:59:46.240
<v Speaker 1>But this is a movie all about those moments of

0:59:46.640 --> 0:59:50.520
<v Speaker 1>taking little leaps, of embracing that risk. And so what

0:59:50.600 --> 0:59:53.240
<v Speaker 1>it makes you think, you know, more than what makes

0:59:53.280 --> 0:59:55.520
<v Speaker 1>it special as a movie is make it and how

0:59:55.600 --> 0:59:59.320
<v Speaker 1>you end up reflecting on your life, My life at twenty,

1:00:00.160 --> 1:00:03.720
<v Speaker 1>life at you know, at nearly thirty, at in my forties,

1:00:03.880 --> 1:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>and that's what makes this whole thing such a special thing.

1:00:06.920 --> 1:00:10.120
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, for all you non gen xers out there, all

1:00:10.160 --> 1:00:14.120
<v Speaker 5>you kids, you know, congrats on your youth, but you

1:00:14.640 --> 1:00:17.480
<v Speaker 5>you didn't get to have Jesse and Saline mark the

1:00:17.560 --> 1:00:20.080
<v Speaker 5>stages of your life the way we did, right, And

1:00:20.200 --> 1:00:22.960
<v Speaker 5>I really do value that and feel that that's that's

1:00:22.960 --> 1:00:25.080
<v Speaker 5>something really special. You set us up, Sam, I think

1:00:25.120 --> 1:00:27.280
<v Speaker 5>we should we should talk about it. There are so

1:00:27.480 --> 1:00:29.520
<v Speaker 5>many great moments to choose from. We did do a

1:00:29.600 --> 1:00:32.439
<v Speaker 5>top five link later scenes. We should have just done

1:00:32.600 --> 1:00:35.440
<v Speaker 5>scenes from this trilogy, and maybe we can revisit that

1:00:35.960 --> 1:00:39.240
<v Speaker 5>at some point. What's your favorite moment in the film,

1:00:39.400 --> 1:00:41.320
<v Speaker 5>What is your favorite scene? We can kind of go

1:00:41.400 --> 1:00:43.480
<v Speaker 5>down the road same did one? Did one stand out

1:00:43.520 --> 1:00:45.640
<v Speaker 5>this time? Is it different than what maybe you thought

1:00:45.720 --> 1:00:47.240
<v Speaker 5>it was going to be going in?

1:00:48.160 --> 1:00:51.880
<v Speaker 1>There are three and a right to not scenes moments,

1:00:51.920 --> 1:00:54.080
<v Speaker 1>So these are moments, and these are all wordless moments.

1:00:54.880 --> 1:00:58.400
<v Speaker 1>And I realized, actually very late that what made me

1:00:58.680 --> 1:01:00.680
<v Speaker 1>be able to take in these moments is that there's

1:01:00.720 --> 1:01:04.360
<v Speaker 1>no score. There's music, but no score. In fact the harpsichord.

1:01:04.400 --> 1:01:06.280
<v Speaker 1>I was like, oh there is a score. No, no,

1:01:06.440 --> 1:01:10.440
<v Speaker 1>it's a real harpsichord the garden apartment. So there are

1:01:10.480 --> 1:01:13.160
<v Speaker 1>three moments and they all capture what I was getting

1:01:13.240 --> 1:01:18.640
<v Speaker 1>at the terror of encountering the real Oh shit, this

1:01:18.800 --> 1:01:22.439
<v Speaker 1>is real life. And the first moment is when Jesse

1:01:22.760 --> 1:01:25.680
<v Speaker 1>decides to first say something to Suline, and there I

1:01:26.040 --> 1:01:29.200
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's my imagination. There's a subtle push in

1:01:29.320 --> 1:01:32.280
<v Speaker 1>of the camera right before he says something, so you

1:01:32.400 --> 1:01:35.320
<v Speaker 1>see the choice he makes and It's like, these are

1:01:35.360 --> 1:01:38.320
<v Speaker 1>the moments where you can't not be sincere. This is

1:01:38.400 --> 1:01:41.880
<v Speaker 1>such a gen X movie. Sincerity was not something we

1:01:41.960 --> 1:01:44.680
<v Speaker 1>were great at. We didn't love that still are.

1:01:46.160 --> 1:01:46.200
<v Speaker 12>So.

1:01:47.000 --> 1:01:49.880
<v Speaker 1>So there's that moment and you see it on his face,

1:01:50.400 --> 1:01:52.280
<v Speaker 1>and again the camera really helps with that. There's that

1:01:52.320 --> 1:01:55.880
<v Speaker 1>little push in the listening booth scene. Obviously great.

1:01:56.000 --> 1:01:56.920
<v Speaker 5>So you're gonna take all of it.

1:01:56.960 --> 1:01:58.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna take the scene. I'm not gonna take

1:01:58.920 --> 1:02:01.520
<v Speaker 1>the scene. I'm just gonna There is a moment, so

1:02:01.720 --> 1:02:05.440
<v Speaker 1>the music starts. God, what a great scene. God, But

1:02:05.600 --> 1:02:09.160
<v Speaker 1>there is a moment the music started. As soon as

1:02:09.360 --> 1:02:13.720
<v Speaker 1>we hear her voice, Selene is startled. There's a moment

1:02:13.800 --> 1:02:20.440
<v Speaker 1>where she almost shakes because it's the voice again is

1:02:20.560 --> 1:02:24.320
<v Speaker 1>singing with such sincerity that I think it wakes her

1:02:24.400 --> 1:02:26.960
<v Speaker 1>up to the reality of the moment. And and we've

1:02:27.000 --> 1:02:30.440
<v Speaker 1>all felt that that little shiver of what music can

1:02:30.520 --> 1:02:35.000
<v Speaker 1>do and being in that moment with somebody. The third moment,

1:02:36.200 --> 1:02:38.640
<v Speaker 1>right before the kiss, it's right before the first kiss.

1:02:39.440 --> 1:02:41.160
<v Speaker 1>They're on what what is that called that they're on?

1:02:41.320 --> 1:02:44.480
<v Speaker 1>It's like a it is a fairis wheel, Okay, it

1:02:44.600 --> 1:02:48.320
<v Speaker 1>has a European name, probably but it's very famous.

1:02:48.360 --> 1:02:49.960
<v Speaker 2>It's the way from the third man.

1:02:50.400 --> 1:02:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Oh sure, right, of course, the moment right before they

1:02:54.640 --> 1:02:58.440
<v Speaker 1>actually kiss, there's been that whole great exchange about like,

1:02:58.600 --> 1:03:00.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, he's trying to make it cute. You see

1:03:00.920 --> 1:03:04.240
<v Speaker 1>on his face. There's no other word for it. It's terror.

1:03:04.440 --> 1:03:07.800
<v Speaker 1>He's like, this is real, We're really doing this, this

1:03:07.960 --> 1:03:12.000
<v Speaker 1>is meaningful. And again, the lack of score. I think

1:03:12.080 --> 1:03:14.880
<v Speaker 1>a score would erase those moments or your ability to

1:03:14.960 --> 1:03:18.800
<v Speaker 1>connect with those moments. It's so nakedly exposed and they're

1:03:18.920 --> 1:03:22.400
<v Speaker 1>so good at capturing it. Those are my three favorite.

1:03:22.120 --> 1:03:25.080
<v Speaker 5>Moments between she talks about later you need it, and

1:03:25.120 --> 1:03:27.680
<v Speaker 5>the music would ruin that great, great film.

1:03:27.960 --> 1:03:29.240
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, lack of score.

1:03:29.720 --> 1:03:32.680
<v Speaker 7>I'm going to talk about moments where there's lack of

1:03:32.800 --> 1:03:35.440
<v Speaker 7>dialogue and there's an irony there with you know, Linklater,

1:03:35.520 --> 1:03:39.200
<v Speaker 7>who is such a verbose filmmaker in so many great ways.

1:03:39.320 --> 1:03:41.840
<v Speaker 7>But when we did our you mentioned ad on top

1:03:41.920 --> 1:03:44.560
<v Speaker 7>five Ethan Hawk moments. This was episode six ninety six.

1:03:45.360 --> 1:03:48.600
<v Speaker 7>I picked on the tram that early moment where he

1:03:48.920 --> 1:03:53.240
<v Speaker 7>tentatively reaches out to fix Salim's hair and then stops

1:03:53.280 --> 1:03:56.040
<v Speaker 7>himself because it's the pause for me.

1:03:56.160 --> 1:03:56.840
<v Speaker 3>That's romantic.

1:03:57.040 --> 1:04:01.320
<v Speaker 7>It's the it's the acknowledging of where we are right

1:04:01.400 --> 1:04:05.120
<v Speaker 7>now and we're not there. And so I'm going to pause.

1:04:05.440 --> 1:04:08.080
<v Speaker 7>And we when we did uh just talk about our

1:04:08.120 --> 1:04:10.680
<v Speaker 7>Pantheon review Adam of Cleo from five to seventh of

1:04:10.800 --> 1:04:14.320
<v Speaker 7>ARTI film, we were talking about how that extended tram

1:04:14.520 --> 1:04:17.480
<v Speaker 7>scene between the two of them, there is, you know,

1:04:17.640 --> 1:04:19.800
<v Speaker 7>obvious inspiration for this tram sequence.

1:04:19.880 --> 1:04:22.640
<v Speaker 1>So and the Palm Reader, did you guys think of

1:04:22.720 --> 1:04:25.520
<v Speaker 1>that too? That's right, the Palm Reader, which is opens

1:04:26.560 --> 1:04:27.320
<v Speaker 1>ives of seven.

1:04:27.120 --> 1:04:28.960
<v Speaker 3>Start to the Power. Yeah, yeah, I forgot about that.

1:04:29.080 --> 1:04:29.240
<v Speaker 5>Sam.

1:04:29.320 --> 1:04:31.840
<v Speaker 7>That's good, and so the other one. And I have

1:04:31.920 --> 1:04:34.880
<v Speaker 7>the receipts for this, so I'm claiming this and I

1:04:34.960 --> 1:04:39.000
<v Speaker 7>can prove it. Sorry, Scott, but we did link later

1:04:39.080 --> 1:04:41.640
<v Speaker 7>scenes on five to eighty one. My number one all

1:04:41.720 --> 1:04:44.280
<v Speaker 7>his filmography, listening Booth.

1:04:45.240 --> 1:04:46.160
<v Speaker 3>It's the listening booth.

1:04:46.200 --> 1:04:51.600
<v Speaker 7>And it's again no words, a word, one word. You're

1:04:51.720 --> 1:04:54.640
<v Speaker 7>begging that no one says a word, because one word

1:04:54.680 --> 1:04:56.480
<v Speaker 7>from two of them would ruin that.

1:04:57.240 --> 1:05:01.240
<v Speaker 3>And the way we're allowed to read into their reactions.

1:05:01.880 --> 1:05:05.080
<v Speaker 7>I don't know if there's any interviews that talk about

1:05:05.360 --> 1:05:08.840
<v Speaker 7>rehearsals that went into that or did link later just

1:05:08.960 --> 1:05:11.680
<v Speaker 7>throw them into the booth and trust them. You know,

1:05:11.720 --> 1:05:14.680
<v Speaker 7>their chemistry is obviously one of the major elements of

1:05:14.720 --> 1:05:17.360
<v Speaker 7>this movie. But yeah, to just to let that play out,

1:05:17.760 --> 1:05:20.080
<v Speaker 7>and then the choice to end it, which I had

1:05:20.120 --> 1:05:24.200
<v Speaker 7>forgotten again watching it today, but that it doesn't conclude,

1:05:24.480 --> 1:05:28.160
<v Speaker 7>but that song continues as then we get a few

1:05:28.160 --> 1:05:31.560
<v Speaker 7>shots across the city. So yeah, for me, it's always

1:05:31.640 --> 1:05:32.560
<v Speaker 7>going to be the listening booth.

1:05:34.360 --> 1:05:36.480
<v Speaker 2>I was like, Nobod's gonna take the listening booth, I'll salute.

1:05:38.160 --> 1:05:38.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

1:05:38.520 --> 1:05:40.960
<v Speaker 12>I mean one thing another thing I will add about

1:05:40.960 --> 1:05:44.640
<v Speaker 12>the listening booth before choosing something else is I think

1:05:44.760 --> 1:05:49.120
<v Speaker 12>when you have that experience of just saying this is

1:05:49.120 --> 1:05:50.560
<v Speaker 12>a really cool song, you want to listen to it.

1:05:50.640 --> 1:05:52.400
<v Speaker 12>It's the most awkward thing in the world you could

1:05:52.440 --> 1:05:55.080
<v Speaker 12>do just to stand around and listen to this. And

1:05:55.160 --> 1:05:57.640
<v Speaker 12>this is still a reasonably they still don't know each

1:05:57.640 --> 1:06:00.280
<v Speaker 12>other terribly well, but there is desire that and so

1:06:00.400 --> 1:06:01.960
<v Speaker 12>you get all of that, You get that feel of

1:06:02.160 --> 1:06:05.360
<v Speaker 12>you're so uncomfortable being in that space together, yet you're

1:06:05.400 --> 1:06:08.600
<v Speaker 12>feeling the flirtiness and the desire and everything is all

1:06:08.720 --> 1:06:12.240
<v Speaker 12>sort of done wordlessly, and the just as performance piece.

1:06:12.320 --> 1:06:14.800
<v Speaker 2>Just watching those two actors in that scene is incredible.

1:06:15.080 --> 1:06:16.960
<v Speaker 2>But I'm just go ahead and let that one go

1:06:17.360 --> 1:06:20.720
<v Speaker 2>to me. It's the it's it's a phone call, uh,

1:06:21.000 --> 1:06:23.080
<v Speaker 2>the because you know, it's it's.

1:06:23.000 --> 1:06:26.919
<v Speaker 12>So funny and adorable and romantic. But I also love

1:06:27.080 --> 1:06:32.600
<v Speaker 12>how that exercise allows them the opportunity to say how

1:06:32.640 --> 1:06:35.120
<v Speaker 12>they really feel about each other and talk in whether

1:06:35.160 --> 1:06:37.800
<v Speaker 12>they could not have accessed any other way and so,

1:06:38.040 --> 1:06:40.479
<v Speaker 12>and it comes at a point, you know, a little

1:06:40.520 --> 1:06:42.480
<v Speaker 12>bit later in the film where where they're feelings for

1:06:42.560 --> 1:06:46.160
<v Speaker 12>each other have really intensified. And yeah, that's the one

1:06:46.200 --> 1:06:46.400
<v Speaker 12>for me.

1:06:46.840 --> 1:06:49.040
<v Speaker 5>I was sure thinking about this earlier today that I

1:06:49.160 --> 1:06:51.440
<v Speaker 5>was going to say the listening booth as well, because

1:06:51.480 --> 1:06:54.080
<v Speaker 5>it's it's incredible. Yeah, I have no other options here,

1:06:54.120 --> 1:06:58.520
<v Speaker 5>thanks guys. But the the interesting thing too, I noticed

1:06:58.560 --> 1:07:00.720
<v Speaker 5>this time. I never really thought about it before, but Sam,

1:07:00.880 --> 1:07:04.280
<v Speaker 5>the kiss follows on the heels of that, and I

1:07:04.360 --> 1:07:07.560
<v Speaker 5>don't think the kiss happens at least at that point

1:07:07.600 --> 1:07:10.880
<v Speaker 5>in the movie, that point in their day, if we

1:07:10.960 --> 1:07:12.680
<v Speaker 5>don't get the listening booth scined first.

1:07:12.840 --> 1:07:15.040
<v Speaker 7>It's right, it't happen in the listening booth either. No,

1:07:15.200 --> 1:07:18.520
<v Speaker 7>that's yeah, that would be be interruptive as a word said.

1:07:19.080 --> 1:07:21.320
<v Speaker 5>We need to know, they need to know, they need

1:07:21.400 --> 1:07:24.240
<v Speaker 5>to have that shared experience, that they both want it,

1:07:24.440 --> 1:07:27.760
<v Speaker 5>even though they're they're not directly communicating it. And that's

1:07:27.800 --> 1:07:30.960
<v Speaker 5>why I think he feels not only like he has to,

1:07:31.320 --> 1:07:34.200
<v Speaker 5>you know, he needs to do it, but emboldened to

1:07:34.240 --> 1:07:37.280
<v Speaker 5>actually try. I think it follows the listening booth. So

1:07:37.560 --> 1:07:40.600
<v Speaker 5>I look back at my link later scenes and I

1:07:40.680 --> 1:07:42.360
<v Speaker 5>thought again that would be number one or two, and

1:07:42.440 --> 1:07:45.520
<v Speaker 5>actually that was an honorable mention, my first honorable mention.

1:07:45.680 --> 1:07:48.760
<v Speaker 5>So my number one link later scene was the one

1:07:48.880 --> 1:07:51.760
<v Speaker 5>you just mentioned, Scott. It's the fake phone call scene,

1:07:51.800 --> 1:07:53.720
<v Speaker 5>and it is because of the honesty. And you think

1:07:53.720 --> 1:07:56.720
<v Speaker 5>about those first dates, Sam, you've mentioned that when you

1:07:56.960 --> 1:07:59.080
<v Speaker 5>build up the courage to ask someone out, most of

1:07:59.200 --> 1:08:00.880
<v Speaker 5>us probably don't have first states that are quite like

1:08:01.240 --> 1:08:02.200
<v Speaker 5>this in the movie.

1:08:02.360 --> 1:08:03.760
<v Speaker 3>You know, they're being pretty.

1:08:03.480 --> 1:08:06.520
<v Speaker 5>Open with each other, but you're not open, You're not honest,

1:08:06.600 --> 1:08:09.120
<v Speaker 5>You're not truly honest on a first date. You're still

1:08:09.200 --> 1:08:12.480
<v Speaker 5>presenting a version of yourself, the best version you can

1:08:12.560 --> 1:08:16.360
<v Speaker 5>possibly present. And as honest as they are being with

1:08:16.439 --> 1:08:19.120
<v Speaker 5>each other, that's the moment where they finally get to

1:08:19.520 --> 1:08:22.640
<v Speaker 5>really understand how the other feels about them, and they

1:08:22.760 --> 1:08:24.679
<v Speaker 5>only get to do it through the artifice. They only

1:08:24.720 --> 1:08:28.200
<v Speaker 5>get to do it through the mechanism of play acting.

1:08:28.520 --> 1:08:31.479
<v Speaker 5>It's theater, and the other element of it that I

1:08:31.720 --> 1:08:37.320
<v Speaker 5>love is that she says, she reveals that, if she's

1:08:37.360 --> 1:08:39.120
<v Speaker 5>being honest, the moment she really fell in love with

1:08:39.240 --> 1:08:40.840
<v Speaker 5>him was when he was telling the story on the

1:08:40.920 --> 1:08:44.760
<v Speaker 5>train about his grandmother passing away. And the thing is

1:08:44.840 --> 1:08:46.880
<v Speaker 5>Link later. Of course, being the one who wrote the script,

1:08:47.720 --> 1:08:50.240
<v Speaker 5>he shows us that. He tells us that go back

1:08:50.320 --> 1:08:53.760
<v Speaker 5>and watch it that close up when they cut to

1:08:53.840 --> 1:08:57.200
<v Speaker 5>that reverse shot of her, the camera is just slightly closer.

1:08:57.640 --> 1:08:59.920
<v Speaker 5>We really haven't seen Delpy quite that close. We haven't

1:09:00.000 --> 1:09:03.479
<v Speaker 5>seem Dealty that beautiful. There's something about just the way

1:09:03.560 --> 1:09:05.840
<v Speaker 5>she's tilting her head. It's in the performance too, but

1:09:05.960 --> 1:09:08.960
<v Speaker 5>between performance and what Link later is really subtly done

1:09:09.000 --> 1:09:09.479
<v Speaker 5>with the camera.

1:09:09.920 --> 1:09:11.080
<v Speaker 2>We see it on her face.

1:09:11.200 --> 1:09:13.120
<v Speaker 5>We read that like, that's the moment she's.

1:09:12.960 --> 1:09:15.400
<v Speaker 1>We not only see it, but we remember it when

1:09:15.600 --> 1:09:17.639
<v Speaker 1>she mentions it later that that's the moment. We already

1:09:17.720 --> 1:09:18.200
<v Speaker 1>knew it was.

1:09:18.200 --> 1:09:23.120
<v Speaker 5>The moment so time I was I was shimed. I

1:09:23.160 --> 1:09:25.000
<v Speaker 5>don't know why I was shocked by this, because I

1:09:25.120 --> 1:09:28.400
<v Speaker 5>do love Richard link Later movies and would have thought,

1:09:28.479 --> 1:09:32.439
<v Speaker 5>of course he's going to deal with time. But it's

1:09:32.479 --> 1:09:34.800
<v Speaker 5>really like the basis of every conversation to have in

1:09:34.880 --> 1:09:35.679
<v Speaker 5>this film isn't.

1:09:35.600 --> 1:09:37.439
<v Speaker 1>Every twenty minutes it comes up. I mean, I think

1:09:37.479 --> 1:09:40.600
<v Speaker 1>the first time is when he's talking about his documentary

1:09:40.640 --> 1:09:42.240
<v Speaker 1>idea for cable access or whatever, and.

1:09:42.240 --> 1:09:44.560
<v Speaker 5>I'm thinking about Boyhood and ead Evanquility go on to

1:09:44.640 --> 1:09:45.760
<v Speaker 5>do something kind of like.

1:09:45.800 --> 1:09:48.120
<v Speaker 1>It, but it's like, oh, yeah, just hits you capital

1:09:48.200 --> 1:09:52.360
<v Speaker 1>t time and then it comes up over and over again. Yeah,

1:09:52.400 --> 1:09:54.000
<v Speaker 1>that it's already very much on his mind.

1:09:54.080 --> 1:09:57.840
<v Speaker 7>And this space they have because it's a limited time space.

1:09:57.880 --> 1:10:00.719
<v Speaker 7>I think that's another reason for the honesty. It frees

1:10:00.760 --> 1:10:03.519
<v Speaker 7>them up, you know, because they are constricted. They have

1:10:03.800 --> 1:10:08.400
<v Speaker 7>time barriers, time constraints, and so they're not planning. I mean,

1:10:08.439 --> 1:10:11.720
<v Speaker 7>they eventually start planning, but they're not planning for date two,

1:10:12.200 --> 1:10:16.280
<v Speaker 7>I guess, and there's a freedom in that, but it's

1:10:16.320 --> 1:10:18.000
<v Speaker 7>all because of the time constriction.

1:10:18.160 --> 1:10:18.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1:10:18.320 --> 1:10:21.120
<v Speaker 12>I mean that is the theme of link Latter's career.

1:10:21.200 --> 1:10:23.320
<v Speaker 12>Time and memory, and I think memory is a part

1:10:23.360 --> 1:10:24.760
<v Speaker 12>of this film as well.

1:10:25.000 --> 1:10:25.160
<v Speaker 2>You know.

1:10:25.200 --> 1:10:27.599
<v Speaker 12>But if you think about link Latter's career, the film

1:10:27.680 --> 1:10:30.320
<v Speaker 12>he did before this was another Dusk till Dawn movie

1:10:30.520 --> 1:10:33.040
<v Speaker 12>was Days and Confused, sort of based around his own

1:10:33.120 --> 1:10:36.000
<v Speaker 12>memories of high school. This happened to him as well

1:10:36.160 --> 1:10:39.240
<v Speaker 12>some version of this story. Your Boyhood is obviously an

1:10:39.479 --> 1:10:42.320
<v Speaker 12>extension of time which we're following people in both a

1:10:42.400 --> 1:10:45.160
<v Speaker 12>real way and Almoso documentary way as well, because these

1:10:45.200 --> 1:10:47.840
<v Speaker 12>are real the actors are real people who are who

1:10:48.360 --> 1:10:51.040
<v Speaker 12>are growing throughout this amount of time. And of course

1:10:51.280 --> 1:10:54.920
<v Speaker 12>all these three films together also interesting to think about

1:10:54.960 --> 1:10:56.719
<v Speaker 12>in terms of time. If you think about the amount

1:10:56.760 --> 1:11:00.680
<v Speaker 12>of time that Justin and Seleen spend together, you know,

1:11:00.760 --> 1:11:03.000
<v Speaker 12>it's just very little between this between the time they

1:11:03.040 --> 1:11:04.960
<v Speaker 12>spend here, which is certainly less than twenty four hours,

1:11:04.960 --> 1:11:06.640
<v Speaker 12>and then and then the little bit of time they

1:11:06.680 --> 1:11:09.400
<v Speaker 12>get in before a sunset, which is kind of done

1:11:09.439 --> 1:11:12.200
<v Speaker 12>in real time. The amount of actual time they spend

1:11:12.200 --> 1:11:15.599
<v Speaker 12>together is very very small, which might also explain how

1:11:15.720 --> 1:11:17.760
<v Speaker 12>much they're fighting and before midnight when they get to

1:11:17.800 --> 1:11:18.240
<v Speaker 12>know each other.

1:11:19.120 --> 1:11:22.000
<v Speaker 2>But and then of course with the memory part, I.

1:11:22.000 --> 1:11:24.720
<v Speaker 12>Mean you get at the end of this movie, this

1:11:25.080 --> 1:11:29.640
<v Speaker 12>beautiful montage of all the spaces that they've visited and

1:11:30.160 --> 1:11:34.920
<v Speaker 12>recontextualized by their relationship. All of these spaces now have

1:11:35.680 --> 1:11:39.080
<v Speaker 12>a meeting imposed upon them and imposed upon us due

1:11:39.120 --> 1:11:41.559
<v Speaker 12>to their presence in them, and those spaces are going

1:11:41.600 --> 1:11:43.080
<v Speaker 12>to be remember, are going to be burned in their

1:11:43.120 --> 1:11:45.360
<v Speaker 12>memories and hopefully, I guess if we appreciate the movie

1:11:45.400 --> 1:11:45.960
<v Speaker 12>burned in ours.

1:11:46.400 --> 1:11:48.600
<v Speaker 7>I think that connects with your the opening thing you

1:11:48.680 --> 1:11:51.880
<v Speaker 7>mentioned Adam about you know, the camera phones and the technology.

1:11:52.320 --> 1:11:54.120
<v Speaker 7>It's when they say when he says I'm going to

1:11:54.160 --> 1:11:57.120
<v Speaker 7>take a picture, you know, and then doesn't, but he

1:11:57.280 --> 1:11:59.920
<v Speaker 7>stands there we're getting Those are the pictures they might

1:12:00.200 --> 1:12:02.439
<v Speaker 7>have taken of those spots, Scott when we get back

1:12:02.439 --> 1:12:02.600
<v Speaker 7>to it.

1:12:02.760 --> 1:12:04.640
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, I like that that connects with.

1:12:04.680 --> 1:12:07.240
<v Speaker 12>This you know selfie sticks at that time, which was.

1:12:08.000 --> 1:12:09.880
<v Speaker 1>Well, not only that, but you realize there are the

1:12:09.920 --> 1:12:12.640
<v Speaker 1>moments when the conversation dies. That's where I was like,

1:12:12.800 --> 1:12:15.960
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to throw my phone into the equivalent of

1:12:16.000 --> 1:12:19.639
<v Speaker 1>the Danube because it's like we fill those moments. Those

1:12:19.640 --> 1:12:21.880
<v Speaker 1>are the moments we'd reach for our phone or be

1:12:22.000 --> 1:12:25.000
<v Speaker 1>like check my texts or check my email. They have

1:12:25.160 --> 1:12:28.280
<v Speaker 1>to sit in those moments of discomfort. The conversation has

1:12:28.680 --> 1:12:30.760
<v Speaker 1>has kind of gone into a little bit of a

1:12:30.840 --> 1:12:33.360
<v Speaker 1>lull and they have to reignite it. It's a nice bridge,

1:12:33.520 --> 1:12:35.479
<v Speaker 1>and it's yeah, and it's like we don't we yeah,

1:12:35.520 --> 1:12:36.280
<v Speaker 1>put it, you know.

1:12:36.400 --> 1:12:38.400
<v Speaker 2>It's like, I like this bridge.

1:12:39.520 --> 1:12:42.360
<v Speaker 1>Exactly, we even see that exactly. I got nothing, but

1:12:42.439 --> 1:12:43.880
<v Speaker 1>I realized there needs to be something here.

1:12:43.920 --> 1:12:44.960
<v Speaker 3>How about the bridge.

1:12:45.600 --> 1:12:47.920
<v Speaker 1>Identifying with those moments in a different way. It's like,

1:12:48.000 --> 1:12:51.760
<v Speaker 1>we don't, we don't do that anymore, And it made

1:12:51.800 --> 1:12:53.120
<v Speaker 1>me long for those moments.

1:12:53.240 --> 1:12:56.320
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, there's a really significant small thing that happens in

1:12:56.360 --> 1:12:58.600
<v Speaker 12>the movie, at least something that I caught when watching it,

1:12:59.080 --> 1:13:02.360
<v Speaker 12>is when the palm reader comes over and says something

1:13:02.400 --> 1:13:05.280
<v Speaker 12>to Selene about how she believes in the power of

1:13:05.360 --> 1:13:05.719
<v Speaker 12>the moment.

1:13:06.320 --> 1:13:08.280
<v Speaker 2>And I think that's really a critical.

1:13:07.960 --> 1:13:10.280
<v Speaker 12>Thing about a film like this, or film like Days

1:13:10.320 --> 1:13:13.320
<v Speaker 12>to Confused, where it's just in its memory based of

1:13:13.479 --> 1:13:17.640
<v Speaker 12>just like these really critical moments out of time that

1:13:17.800 --> 1:13:21.040
<v Speaker 12>just stay with you and are so important, and that

1:13:21.160 --> 1:13:24.960
<v Speaker 12>these two people believe in so sincerely that they're able,

1:13:25.040 --> 1:13:27.280
<v Speaker 12>that they're willing to jump off this train, to get

1:13:27.320 --> 1:13:30.160
<v Speaker 12>off this train together and do something impulsive because they

1:13:30.200 --> 1:13:31.680
<v Speaker 12>want they believe in the power of the moment, and

1:13:31.720 --> 1:13:36.160
<v Speaker 12>they're willing to pursue this moment is as passionately as

1:13:36.200 --> 1:13:39.960
<v Speaker 12>they can without regard to the consequences, without having caution

1:13:40.120 --> 1:13:42.280
<v Speaker 12>about what, you know, the reality that there is an

1:13:42.400 --> 1:13:44.320
<v Speaker 12>endpoint to all of this, where where she's going to

1:13:44.360 --> 1:13:46.320
<v Speaker 12>get back on train, He's going to take the plane

1:13:46.360 --> 1:13:48.479
<v Speaker 12>back to America, and this this is going to end.

1:13:48.600 --> 1:13:50.320
<v Speaker 2>They disregard that thought.

1:13:50.680 --> 1:13:53.160
<v Speaker 5>I'm glad that you mentioned memory in addition to time,

1:13:53.240 --> 1:13:56.519
<v Speaker 5>because I guess enough time had passed since I last

1:13:56.520 --> 1:13:59.040
<v Speaker 5>seen this film. I had forgotten about the coda at

1:13:59.080 --> 1:14:01.360
<v Speaker 5>the end the post. I kind of thought it ended

1:14:01.680 --> 1:14:04.439
<v Speaker 5>there at the train station, and the fact that we

1:14:04.560 --> 1:14:07.160
<v Speaker 5>get link later just kind of reminding us of the

1:14:07.200 --> 1:14:09.720
<v Speaker 5>different spots that they hit. But then we also get

1:14:10.400 --> 1:14:13.920
<v Speaker 5>cuts back to each of them reflecting, and you can't

1:14:13.960 --> 1:14:16.519
<v Speaker 5>imagine in that moment that that's what they're doing, is

1:14:16.560 --> 1:14:21.560
<v Speaker 5>they're replaying the night, that's their vision, reimagining, you know,

1:14:21.760 --> 1:14:27.400
<v Speaker 5>what they experienced together. So I forgot to do this earlier.

1:14:27.840 --> 1:14:29.720
<v Speaker 5>You can trust Ethan Hawk is going to have an

1:14:29.720 --> 1:14:34.040
<v Speaker 5>original idea. We kept overlapping on our favorite scenes, but

1:14:34.200 --> 1:14:36.840
<v Speaker 5>I did have a chance. Still my favorite interview ever,

1:14:37.000 --> 1:14:39.479
<v Speaker 5>and it was because of Ethan Hawk one hundred percent

1:14:40.080 --> 1:14:42.840
<v Speaker 5>what he gave to the interview. Best conversation I've had

1:14:42.920 --> 1:14:45.679
<v Speaker 5>on the show a few years back. That's not with Josh,

1:14:46.360 --> 1:14:50.360
<v Speaker 5>Yeah exactly. Okay, well said, if then can win, that's fine.

1:14:50.600 --> 1:14:54.200
<v Speaker 5>And at the end of the conversation, we were out

1:14:54.280 --> 1:14:56.320
<v Speaker 5>of time, and I was going to go through with

1:14:56.439 --> 1:14:59.080
<v Speaker 5>him these scenes and these moments and just get him

1:14:59.080 --> 1:15:00.800
<v Speaker 5>to talk about them, but we were out of time.

1:15:01.240 --> 1:15:04.479
<v Speaker 5>As you'll hear, he still decided to share with us

1:15:04.560 --> 1:15:07.240
<v Speaker 5>what his favorite moment is in the film. So I

1:15:07.280 --> 1:15:08.720
<v Speaker 5>think Ali's going to help us out and play it.

1:15:09.080 --> 1:15:10.800
<v Speaker 5>There's so much more we could get to. We did

1:15:10.880 --> 1:15:13.240
<v Speaker 5>our top five wink Later scenes a while back, I

1:15:13.280 --> 1:15:16.000
<v Speaker 5>think when Everybody Wants Some came out and I just

1:15:16.080 --> 1:15:18.120
<v Speaker 5>looking at Nist again, realized that four of my five

1:15:18.200 --> 1:15:20.599
<v Speaker 5>scenes had you in it. Go and maybe you're Maybe

1:15:20.640 --> 1:15:22.519
<v Speaker 5>another time we'll be able to go through those.

1:15:22.600 --> 1:15:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I have to do my favorite that I've ever been.

1:15:24.720 --> 1:15:28.679
<v Speaker 6>He is talking Julie to get off the train before summer.

1:15:28.760 --> 1:15:31.479
<v Speaker 6>Oh yeah, you know, I'm telling her that she was

1:15:31.520 --> 1:15:33.400
<v Speaker 6>going to be a time traveler, and I was going

1:15:33.479 --> 1:15:35.439
<v Speaker 6>to make her feel better about her present marriage by

1:15:35.720 --> 1:15:37.680
<v Speaker 6>revealing to her how what a loser I want.

1:15:38.840 --> 1:15:41.240
<v Speaker 1>He was a loser. That's the thing. Isn't that the

1:15:41.240 --> 1:15:43.960
<v Speaker 1>big secret in this movie? He almost blows it like

1:15:44.040 --> 1:15:45.479
<v Speaker 1>a half a dozen times at least.

1:15:45.600 --> 1:15:48.800
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean he's still He's still Ethan Hawk, And

1:15:48.840 --> 1:15:50.840
<v Speaker 5>I'm going to say that that two film run with

1:15:50.960 --> 1:15:55.160
<v Speaker 5>reality bites in this maybe the most gorgeous man ever

1:15:55.280 --> 1:15:58.800
<v Speaker 5>on screen. So at least that's you know, my predilections.

1:16:00.640 --> 1:16:03.400
<v Speaker 5>But you know, I like that that as well because

1:16:03.479 --> 1:16:05.479
<v Speaker 5>it brings up the time travel aspect of it and

1:16:05.520 --> 1:16:08.000
<v Speaker 5>saying you're right that maybe every twenty minutes time is

1:16:08.120 --> 1:16:12.880
<v Speaker 5>explicitly referenced, but every single conversation is either them thinking

1:16:12.960 --> 1:16:16.519
<v Speaker 5>about the future, even imagining a future that they may

1:16:16.600 --> 1:16:18.360
<v Speaker 5>have together, even though I don't think either of them

1:16:18.479 --> 1:16:20.800
<v Speaker 5>in that moment actually believe that, or they're reflecting on

1:16:20.840 --> 1:16:21.760
<v Speaker 5>their past, right.

1:16:22.600 --> 1:16:25.400
<v Speaker 7>I do think the deflation of Jesse is key to

1:16:25.520 --> 1:16:29.640
<v Speaker 7>this movie though. It's really why it works. But it's not,

1:16:30.040 --> 1:16:31.599
<v Speaker 7>you know, making him into a joke at all. It's

1:16:31.600 --> 1:16:34.800
<v Speaker 7>allowing him to be a truer sense of himself it's

1:16:34.840 --> 1:16:38.680
<v Speaker 7>allowing him to be more than that guy who is

1:16:39.000 --> 1:16:41.720
<v Speaker 7>telling that time travel story, which is a great one,

1:16:41.800 --> 1:16:44.000
<v Speaker 7>but it's a bit of a performance, right, And so

1:16:44.200 --> 1:16:47.519
<v Speaker 7>he needs someone like her who's willing to prod and

1:16:47.600 --> 1:16:52.559
<v Speaker 7>poke at that affectionately so that he can become more genuine.

1:16:52.680 --> 1:16:54.840
<v Speaker 3>And then she needs him.

1:16:54.960 --> 1:16:57.320
<v Speaker 7>She needs a sparring partner. She needs someone to, like,

1:16:58.000 --> 1:17:00.559
<v Speaker 7>you know, provide her with some ideas she can push

1:17:00.640 --> 1:17:03.240
<v Speaker 7>back against. And he's definitely do that and doing that,

1:17:03.400 --> 1:17:05.680
<v Speaker 7>and in a way they become this couple that is

1:17:06.439 --> 1:17:08.599
<v Speaker 7>self giving. I think Jesse says a couple of times

1:17:08.600 --> 1:17:11.320
<v Speaker 7>when he talks about love, who are giving each other

1:17:11.439 --> 1:17:13.280
<v Speaker 7>something else that they need. It might just be for

1:17:13.360 --> 1:17:17.240
<v Speaker 7>these eighteen hours or whatever. But Delpy reminded me watching

1:17:17.280 --> 1:17:23.120
<v Speaker 7>it today of another great nineties woman character, actually Elaine

1:17:23.160 --> 1:17:26.439
<v Speaker 7>in Seinfeld. I was getting so many Julia Louis Dreyfus,

1:17:26.560 --> 1:17:29.200
<v Speaker 7>because especially that one line where she goes he says, what.

1:17:29.280 --> 1:17:32.360
<v Speaker 3>Bothers you, and shees, I hate everything. It's just like

1:17:32.680 --> 1:17:34.080
<v Speaker 3>and then you can see her going off.

1:17:34.160 --> 1:17:36.880
<v Speaker 7>I was picturing how there's this same sort of like

1:17:37.560 --> 1:17:41.280
<v Speaker 7>going to take the world on and not worry about

1:17:41.280 --> 1:17:44.120
<v Speaker 7>the consequences, and he provides her that space to do

1:17:44.200 --> 1:17:45.280
<v Speaker 7>it for these couple of hours.

1:17:45.439 --> 1:17:47.559
<v Speaker 1>Well, I love too that link Later and his writing

1:17:47.640 --> 1:17:50.599
<v Speaker 1>partner clearly had learned a few things, but they were

1:17:50.600 --> 1:17:53.720
<v Speaker 1>still able to write for who these characters were at

1:17:53.760 --> 1:17:57.280
<v Speaker 1>that time, which were two people that had a lot

1:17:57.360 --> 1:18:00.719
<v Speaker 1>of ideas and no experience. They were full of shit basically,

1:18:01.040 --> 1:18:03.479
<v Speaker 1>you know when when kind of us when we start exactly,

1:18:03.760 --> 1:18:06.080
<v Speaker 1>but when Hawk says something like what is love? But

1:18:06.160 --> 1:18:09.679
<v Speaker 1>two selfish people just don't want to be lonely, I'm like, Nope,

1:18:09.800 --> 1:18:14.639
<v Speaker 1>not actually at all. You're totally wrong, And that's that's okay,

1:18:14.960 --> 1:18:18.799
<v Speaker 1>Like he's twenty two, twenty three, and that those characters

1:18:18.840 --> 1:18:21.439
<v Speaker 1>feel authentic in what they don't know and have only

1:18:21.560 --> 1:18:24.679
<v Speaker 1>thought about. Yeah, it's just movies so special.

1:18:24.800 --> 1:18:26.560
<v Speaker 5>Well that's actually a perfect note to go out on.

1:18:26.640 --> 1:18:28.719
<v Speaker 5>But I'll open it up to the panel here because

1:18:28.760 --> 1:18:31.000
<v Speaker 5>we do have to Unfortunately, like we ran out of

1:18:31.080 --> 1:18:33.280
<v Speaker 5>time with Ethan Hawk, we're out of time here to

1:18:33.360 --> 1:18:35.639
<v Speaker 5>talk about Ethan Hawk in this film. Any closing thoughts,

1:18:35.720 --> 1:18:38.400
<v Speaker 5>anything else you want to impart to the crowd.

1:18:39.240 --> 1:18:40.880
<v Speaker 2>M hmm, well I want to. I want to let

1:18:40.920 --> 1:18:41.880
<v Speaker 2>me impart this this.

1:18:42.560 --> 1:18:45.240
<v Speaker 12>It's not even related to Before Sunrise because this is

1:18:45.360 --> 1:18:47.759
<v Speaker 12>the end of your this is your yeah film Festival.

1:18:47.840 --> 1:18:49.519
<v Speaker 2>At film Festival, when.

1:18:49.360 --> 1:18:53.200
<v Speaker 12>We talk about film discourse, usually the word discourse we

1:18:53.280 --> 1:18:56.360
<v Speaker 12>put in scare quotes and I and I think that

1:18:57.000 --> 1:18:59.400
<v Speaker 12>as a critic, the best thing that you can do

1:18:59.840 --> 1:19:08.280
<v Speaker 12>is to inspire curiosity, passion, thought, conversation, deepen the experience

1:19:08.360 --> 1:19:10.679
<v Speaker 12>for people. And I think that is something that Film

1:19:10.720 --> 1:19:14.120
<v Speaker 12>Spotting has done throughout its twenty years and continues to

1:19:14.200 --> 1:19:18.400
<v Speaker 12>do and has cultivated this extraordinary crowd. And so I

1:19:18.520 --> 1:19:21.680
<v Speaker 12>just wanted to tip my hat to film Spotting at twenty.

1:19:21.560 --> 1:19:28.240
<v Speaker 5>Thank you very much, Thanks Scott, Thank you. From March.

1:19:28.320 --> 1:19:31.240
<v Speaker 5>That was our post screening Film spotting Fest conversation about

1:19:31.280 --> 1:19:34.960
<v Speaker 5>Before Sunrise with Scott Tobias and producer Sam recorded live

1:19:35.000 --> 1:19:37.160
<v Speaker 5>at Chicago's Music Box Theater. If you'd like to take

1:19:37.200 --> 1:19:39.320
<v Speaker 5>a look back and learn a little bit about Film

1:19:39.360 --> 1:19:42.040
<v Speaker 5>Spotting Fest, you can go to filmspotting dot net slash

1:19:42.320 --> 1:19:46.479
<v Speaker 5>film Spotting dash Fest. One more piece of business. These

1:19:46.560 --> 1:19:49.720
<v Speaker 5>revisits of the first two before movies. This really is

1:19:49.800 --> 1:19:53.120
<v Speaker 5>a jam pack show, Josh. Those revisits were part of

1:19:53.240 --> 1:19:56.680
<v Speaker 5>our Pantheon project for titles in the Pantheon that have

1:19:56.840 --> 1:20:00.840
<v Speaker 5>never received a proper review, we're giving them their due,

1:20:00.960 --> 1:20:03.360
<v Speaker 5>and this is going to be ongoing, tying them in

1:20:03.479 --> 1:20:07.759
<v Speaker 5>with different anniversaries over the next few years. Before Sunrise,

1:20:07.880 --> 1:20:11.440
<v Speaker 5>Before Sunset safe to say still Pantheon worthy.

1:20:11.280 --> 1:20:13.000
<v Speaker 3>Josh Absolutely, yep. Okay.

1:20:13.479 --> 1:20:16.280
<v Speaker 5>The third film in the trilogy, twenty thirteen's Before Midnight,

1:20:16.920 --> 1:20:19.160
<v Speaker 5>is also in the Pantheon. It was a package deal

1:20:20.160 --> 1:20:22.760
<v Speaker 5>that did get a review on the show way back

1:20:22.800 --> 1:20:26.360
<v Speaker 5>on episode four forty nine, so we can consider its

1:20:26.439 --> 1:20:30.040
<v Speaker 5>ticket to the Pantheon already punched. And the answer is,

1:20:30.200 --> 1:20:32.840
<v Speaker 5>we are going to consider it's ticket punch but we're

1:20:32.880 --> 1:20:34.599
<v Speaker 5>also going to take another look at it in twenty

1:20:34.680 --> 1:20:37.240
<v Speaker 5>twenty eight. Why not for its fifteenth anniversary.

1:20:37.520 --> 1:20:37.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

1:20:37.840 --> 1:20:39.679
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, As I think I mentioned when we were talking

1:20:39.760 --> 1:20:43.120
<v Speaker 7>Before Sunset is, I can only imagine my appreciation will

1:20:43.200 --> 1:20:44.880
<v Speaker 7>rise for it and as it did for Sunset on

1:20:44.960 --> 1:20:46.560
<v Speaker 7>a revisit. So it would be fun to do that.

1:20:47.280 --> 1:20:50.120
<v Speaker 5>But we felt like we'd be remiss if we didn't

1:20:50.280 --> 1:20:54.680
<v Speaker 5>use this occasion all this Pantheon talk to induct one

1:20:54.800 --> 1:20:57.760
<v Speaker 5>more film. We're doing a special exemption. We're not going

1:20:57.800 --> 1:21:01.679
<v Speaker 5>to induct anymore Pantheon films until next year when it's time.

1:21:02.080 --> 1:21:05.240
<v Speaker 5>We've decided that we're not going to willy nilly in

1:21:05.320 --> 1:21:07.240
<v Speaker 5>duck movies into the Pantheon. There will be a time

1:21:07.840 --> 1:21:11.160
<v Speaker 5>every year, the same month when we'll do it. There's

1:21:11.200 --> 1:21:14.640
<v Speaker 5>a process now, Josh. But there's a special exemption and

1:21:14.800 --> 1:21:16.840
<v Speaker 5>this movie is worthy and we're going to give you

1:21:16.920 --> 1:21:21.599
<v Speaker 5>its bona fides. That movie is Paul Thomas Anderson's There

1:21:21.600 --> 1:21:22.240
<v Speaker 5>Will Be Blood.

1:21:22.920 --> 1:21:27.360
<v Speaker 7>Why you may recognize it as the champion of film

1:21:27.400 --> 1:21:31.439
<v Speaker 7>spotting madness just a few weeks ago, the best films

1:21:31.520 --> 1:21:34.120
<v Speaker 7>of this century so far. Yeah, There Will Be Blood

1:21:34.200 --> 1:21:38.479
<v Speaker 7>came out on top. And what other madness did it win?

1:21:38.560 --> 1:21:40.680
<v Speaker 3>Adam? Didn't it win a previous tournament.

1:21:40.680 --> 1:21:43.800
<v Speaker 5>Back in twenty nineteen. It won the best of the

1:21:43.880 --> 1:21:47.200
<v Speaker 5>two thousands, So that makes sense, right. If it's going

1:21:47.280 --> 1:21:49.800
<v Speaker 5>to be the best film of the last twenty five years,

1:21:50.280 --> 1:21:53.000
<v Speaker 5>probably should be the best film of the first ten

1:21:53.080 --> 1:21:56.519
<v Speaker 5>years of this quarter century. It also made my list

1:21:56.640 --> 1:21:58.720
<v Speaker 5>of the top twenty five Films of the century list.

1:21:58.960 --> 1:22:01.439
<v Speaker 5>I think it narrowly yours, fair to say, John.

1:22:01.280 --> 1:22:03.760
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, definitely a consideration, and I think it's taken. I

1:22:03.800 --> 1:22:06.679
<v Speaker 7>don't know how many film spotting polls over the years

1:22:06.960 --> 1:22:10.559
<v Speaker 7>on various subjects, whenever it came up, whether that's favorite

1:22:10.600 --> 1:22:14.519
<v Speaker 7>Paul Thomas Anderson film or you know, having listeners also

1:22:14.720 --> 1:22:17.600
<v Speaker 7>vote in these sorts of rankings of the decades. So

1:22:17.720 --> 1:22:21.920
<v Speaker 7>this is a movie that is routinely revered on the

1:22:22.040 --> 1:22:26.519
<v Speaker 7>show and would be the obvious pick if we needed

1:22:26.560 --> 1:22:29.040
<v Speaker 7>a Paul Thomas Anderson film in the Pantheon. I think

1:22:29.080 --> 1:22:32.120
<v Speaker 7>would be an obvious consensus pick. And yes, I will

1:22:32.280 --> 1:22:34.200
<v Speaker 7>say that again, we do not have a Paul Thomas

1:22:34.240 --> 1:22:37.479
<v Speaker 7>Anderson's problem in the pantheon, which is a travesty of

1:22:37.560 --> 1:22:39.639
<v Speaker 7>its own that we are going to be correcting now.

1:22:40.040 --> 1:22:42.920
<v Speaker 5>And yet as obvious as it is, and as obvious

1:22:43.000 --> 1:22:44.880
<v Speaker 5>as it is to have a PTA movie in it,

1:22:45.200 --> 1:22:48.439
<v Speaker 5>I know you'd lobby for Phantom Thread, I could lobby

1:22:48.520 --> 1:22:52.639
<v Speaker 5>for The Master, and I'd even potentially lobby for Boogie Nights.

1:22:52.680 --> 1:22:55.920
<v Speaker 5>So it's a tough choice. But with those credentials it

1:22:56.080 --> 1:22:59.840
<v Speaker 5>has to be. There will be blood. It is going

1:23:00.080 --> 1:23:01.280
<v Speaker 5>into the pantheon.

1:23:06.560 --> 1:23:12.920
<v Speaker 10>Ry, what is this your farewell speech going home, your

1:23:12.960 --> 1:23:13.920
<v Speaker 10>farewell to the troops.

1:23:14.000 --> 1:23:16.760
<v Speaker 3>I'm not going on going with friends, have a good trick.

1:23:21.160 --> 1:23:24.640
<v Speaker 5>More about The film Spotting Pantheon is available at Filmspotting

1:23:24.680 --> 1:23:26.160
<v Speaker 5>dot Net slash Pantheon.

1:23:29.479 --> 1:23:32.080
<v Speaker 9>This episode is brought to you by Peloton. Break through

1:23:32.120 --> 1:23:34.559
<v Speaker 9>the busiest time of year with the brand new Peloton

1:23:34.640 --> 1:23:38.280
<v Speaker 9>Cross Training tread Plus powered by Peloton Iq. With real

1:23:38.360 --> 1:23:41.440
<v Speaker 9>time guidance and endless ways to move, you can personalize

1:23:41.439 --> 1:23:44.640
<v Speaker 9>your workouts and train with confidence, helping you reach your

1:23:44.680 --> 1:23:48.760
<v Speaker 9>goals in less time. Let yourself run, lift, sculpt, push

1:23:48.960 --> 1:23:52.200
<v Speaker 9>and go. Explore the new Peloton Cross Training tread Plus

1:23:52.320 --> 1:23:53.680
<v Speaker 9>at one Peloton dot com.

1:23:54.439 --> 1:23:57.280
<v Speaker 8>Hey, it's Brooklyn Adams and I'm partnering with Abercommy to

1:23:57.360 --> 1:23:59.639
<v Speaker 8>tell you about the newest drop from their Active brand,

1:24:00.160 --> 1:24:03.080
<v Speaker 8>Personal Best. Yp b luggings are made with buttery soft

1:24:03.160 --> 1:24:05.920
<v Speaker 8>fabrics that hug you in all the right places and

1:24:06.200 --> 1:24:09.800
<v Speaker 8>common Abercomi's viral Curve love fit designed to eliminate waste gap,

1:24:10.120 --> 1:24:13.000
<v Speaker 8>Paired with sports bras and super soft sweatshirts. It's active

1:24:13.000 --> 1:24:15.519
<v Speaker 8>word that supports every part of my busy lifestyle and

1:24:15.640 --> 1:24:18.160
<v Speaker 8>gives me my best but ever. Head into the new

1:24:18.240 --> 1:24:21.640
<v Speaker 8>year feeling your personal best. Shop Active by Abercrombie in

1:24:21.720 --> 1:24:23.599
<v Speaker 8>the app, online and in stores.

1:24:32.360 --> 1:24:37.439
<v Speaker 1>Helora, Sure to.

1:24:41.840 --> 1:24:49.479
<v Speaker 2>Hell Bizierier.

1:24:50.520 --> 1:24:54.160
<v Speaker 7>That's for Andre Tarkowski's Nostalgia from nineteen eighty three. It

1:24:54.439 --> 1:24:58.840
<v Speaker 7>is the final film in our Tarkowski Marathon and the

1:24:58.960 --> 1:25:02.759
<v Speaker 7>final Tarkowski film, Adam, you needed to see to become

1:25:02.960 --> 1:25:06.160
<v Speaker 7>a completist. We each had different blind spots as part

1:25:06.160 --> 1:25:08.519
<v Speaker 7>of this marathon, and this was a big one for

1:25:08.680 --> 1:25:11.919
<v Speaker 7>you and now you have seen it the film spotty marathons.

1:25:11.960 --> 1:25:13.720
<v Speaker 7>We do these about once or twice a year. There

1:25:13.800 --> 1:25:18.120
<v Speaker 7>are opportunities to do just that fill in cinematic blind spots.

1:25:18.160 --> 1:25:18.280
<v Speaker 3>Now.

1:25:18.400 --> 1:25:22.120
<v Speaker 7>Nostalgia follows chronologically the film we talked about last week,

1:25:22.200 --> 1:25:27.160
<v Speaker 7>nineteen seventy nine's Stalker. Unlike Stalker, not any metaphysical sci

1:25:27.280 --> 1:25:30.960
<v Speaker 7>fi going on. Instead, this is about a Russian writer

1:25:31.080 --> 1:25:34.120
<v Speaker 7>who is traveling to Italy with a translator to conduct

1:25:34.200 --> 1:25:38.320
<v Speaker 7>research for a project about an eighteenth century Russian composer

1:25:38.400 --> 1:25:41.360
<v Speaker 7>who spent some time in this area of Italy. Nostalgia

1:25:41.439 --> 1:25:44.559
<v Speaker 7>premiered in competition at the nineteen eighty three can Film Festival,

1:25:44.880 --> 1:25:49.120
<v Speaker 7>where Tarkowski shared the Best Director prize with another cinematic heavyweight,

1:25:49.520 --> 1:25:53.760
<v Speaker 7>Robert Broussan, for what ended up being Brosson's final film, larjen.

1:25:53.680 --> 1:25:56.479
<v Speaker 5>If letterbox can be trusted. Josh, it looks like you

1:25:56.720 --> 1:25:59.880
<v Speaker 5>last saw Nostalgia about ten years ago October twenty fifth.

1:26:00.360 --> 1:26:03.320
<v Speaker 5>Was that in advance of our Top five can Best

1:26:03.439 --> 1:26:07.439
<v Speaker 5>Director winners Top five in November twenty fifteen or maybe

1:26:07.479 --> 1:26:09.880
<v Speaker 5>another occasion At the time you wrote it would take

1:26:09.960 --> 1:26:12.680
<v Speaker 5>many viewings to get a more specific handle on Tarkovsky's

1:26:12.720 --> 1:26:15.360
<v Speaker 5>thematic aims. I think you could write that about every

1:26:15.400 --> 1:26:18.479
<v Speaker 5>Tarkovski film, and you could write this as well. Yet

1:26:18.520 --> 1:26:20.720
<v Speaker 5>I was more than content to simply swim in the

1:26:20.840 --> 1:26:25.880
<v Speaker 5>movies mysteries and possibilities. Swim an apt word considering all

1:26:26.240 --> 1:26:30.080
<v Speaker 5>the water imagery. It's not many viewings later, It's just

1:26:30.240 --> 1:26:32.479
<v Speaker 5>one at this point. So how was your handle on

1:26:32.600 --> 1:26:33.800
<v Speaker 5>Tarkovsky this time?

1:26:35.000 --> 1:26:37.400
<v Speaker 7>Getting there with this one? You know, in those times

1:26:37.560 --> 1:26:42.120
<v Speaker 7>talking about Stoker, when I referenced other denser works of Tarkovsky,

1:26:42.200 --> 1:26:46.320
<v Speaker 7>I think I was maybe thinking most about nostalgia. Perhaps

1:26:46.400 --> 1:26:49.800
<v Speaker 7>the sacrifice can be a little bit that way. I

1:26:50.200 --> 1:26:53.679
<v Speaker 7>think this viewing has helped me understand a little better

1:26:53.920 --> 1:26:57.200
<v Speaker 7>what I sawce Off in that first view, and it's

1:26:57.240 --> 1:27:00.479
<v Speaker 7>the theme of motherhood. We can maybe spend some time

1:27:00.600 --> 1:27:04.000
<v Speaker 7>talking about that. I still have questions about that theme.

1:27:04.439 --> 1:27:08.840
<v Speaker 7>But let's jump back to start, at least by jumping

1:27:08.920 --> 1:27:11.479
<v Speaker 7>back to our conversation about Stalker, because with that fresh

1:27:11.520 --> 1:27:14.479
<v Speaker 7>in my mind and that being my most recent viewing,

1:27:15.200 --> 1:27:19.519
<v Speaker 7>I notice that nostalgia in a way has a version

1:27:19.600 --> 1:27:22.360
<v Speaker 7>of the room that is in Stoker. I don't think

1:27:22.400 --> 1:27:25.280
<v Speaker 7>this is the dominant theme, but it is interesting that

1:27:25.400 --> 1:27:28.760
<v Speaker 7>it's there, and it's actually there at the start, when

1:27:29.439 --> 1:27:34.400
<v Speaker 7>we do see the interpreter played by Domesiana Giordano going

1:27:34.479 --> 1:27:36.679
<v Speaker 7>into this chapel, it looks like some sort of chapel

1:27:36.840 --> 1:27:41.920
<v Speaker 7>and she's observing what's going on and the sacristan working there.

1:27:42.439 --> 1:27:44.200
<v Speaker 7>I think she asked him what's supposed to happen here,

1:27:44.240 --> 1:27:47.799
<v Speaker 7>and he says, whatever you like, whatever you need most,

1:27:48.640 --> 1:27:52.200
<v Speaker 7>and right there I was like, oh wow, we're discussing

1:27:52.280 --> 1:27:55.160
<v Speaker 7>the room. And then he says, how about this, but

1:27:55.280 --> 1:27:59.000
<v Speaker 7>you should at least kneel down, which connects to the

1:27:59.080 --> 1:28:01.479
<v Speaker 7>idea I pulled out about the room being where you

1:28:01.600 --> 1:28:04.479
<v Speaker 7>encounter the divine. I like how he also says that

1:28:04.760 --> 1:28:07.120
<v Speaker 7>earlier on there he says if there are casual lookers

1:28:07.840 --> 1:28:12.080
<v Speaker 7>meaning her at the chapel, nothing happens, so it's kind

1:28:12.120 --> 1:28:14.560
<v Speaker 7>of like how serious what is the faith of the

1:28:14.800 --> 1:28:19.120
<v Speaker 7>professor and the writer in Stalker? And then there's that

1:28:19.840 --> 1:28:23.040
<v Speaker 7>bizarre visit that the poet, this main character makes to

1:28:23.160 --> 1:28:28.200
<v Speaker 7>this abandoned abbey, San Gugano. And as he's wandering around

1:28:28.560 --> 1:28:31.799
<v Speaker 7>this edifice with no roof, nothing in the windows, grass

1:28:31.840 --> 1:28:34.200
<v Speaker 7>growing on the ground, but it has this, you know,

1:28:34.320 --> 1:28:37.080
<v Speaker 7>the structure of an abbey. We hear a man and

1:28:37.120 --> 1:28:40.080
<v Speaker 7>a woman talking about the man seeking God, but God

1:28:40.200 --> 1:28:43.559
<v Speaker 7>not responding, and so you know, these are all through

1:28:43.680 --> 1:28:45.840
<v Speaker 7>lines to what I think is the main concern of

1:28:45.880 --> 1:28:49.519
<v Speaker 7>Stalker and a side concern here, but definitely because we

1:28:49.640 --> 1:28:51.519
<v Speaker 7>watched discuss Stoker, I feel like I was able to

1:28:51.640 --> 1:28:54.639
<v Speaker 7>draw that out a little bit more. So That's where

1:28:54.680 --> 1:28:56.439
<v Speaker 7>I was at with this second viewing. But yeah, for

1:28:56.560 --> 1:28:59.040
<v Speaker 7>your first viewing, was there something that stood out to

1:28:59.080 --> 1:29:03.120
<v Speaker 7>you as a prominence or preeminent concern of all the

1:29:03.280 --> 1:29:07.040
<v Speaker 7>things Tartskovsky is dipping his toes in with this film.

1:29:07.400 --> 1:29:11.160
<v Speaker 5>Well, before I try to answer that I mentioned earlier,

1:29:11.840 --> 1:29:15.640
<v Speaker 5>the coincidence spotting of watching this film after watching and

1:29:15.720 --> 1:29:18.400
<v Speaker 5>also talking about before sunset and sunrise on this show,

1:29:18.600 --> 1:29:21.080
<v Speaker 5>it is not just the nostalgia thing. What did it

1:29:21.200 --> 1:29:24.160
<v Speaker 5>for me. Josh was at some point seeing a close

1:29:24.240 --> 1:29:30.160
<v Speaker 5>up of Domisiana Giordano Eugenia as you mentioned, and seeing

1:29:30.280 --> 1:29:34.720
<v Speaker 5>that strawberry blonde hair, the curly long lock. She's doing

1:29:34.840 --> 1:29:36.680
<v Speaker 5>something with her hair, and it was like I was

1:29:36.760 --> 1:29:41.439
<v Speaker 5>looking at Julie Delpy from before, from before Sunset and Sunrise,

1:29:41.760 --> 1:29:46.640
<v Speaker 5>and they're having these philosophical conversations. Is they're kind of

1:29:46.800 --> 1:29:50.839
<v Speaker 5>sitting and strolling around, and he's a writer, like Jesse's

1:29:50.880 --> 1:29:55.400
<v Speaker 5>a writer. And I was just flashing back to Sunset

1:29:55.439 --> 1:29:58.040
<v Speaker 5>and Sunrise as I was watching this movie, even being

1:29:58.120 --> 1:30:01.559
<v Speaker 5>in a foreign country for the writer in this case

1:30:01.720 --> 1:30:04.160
<v Speaker 5>as well. So that was in my mind as I

1:30:04.240 --> 1:30:06.960
<v Speaker 5>was watching this film. But what was really in my

1:30:07.080 --> 1:30:11.200
<v Speaker 5>mind watching it as the culmination of this marathon was

1:30:12.000 --> 1:30:14.920
<v Speaker 5>how perfect it was. Whether or not it's the last

1:30:15.280 --> 1:30:17.920
<v Speaker 5>film from Tarkovski, it's not, We have the Sacrifice. It

1:30:18.080 --> 1:30:20.400
<v Speaker 5>is a perfect closing film to this marathon, because the

1:30:20.680 --> 1:30:23.920
<v Speaker 5>opening of this movie is a kind of Tarkovski one

1:30:24.000 --> 1:30:29.320
<v Speaker 5>oh one. We have this shot where you've got this

1:30:30.120 --> 1:30:36.000
<v Speaker 5>misty haze fog sweeping across. You've used this word, I

1:30:36.040 --> 1:30:38.080
<v Speaker 5>think I've used it before, maybe back when we talked

1:30:38.120 --> 1:30:42.160
<v Speaker 5>about mirror, like something's been conjured, that is that is

1:30:42.280 --> 1:30:46.040
<v Speaker 5>sweeping across the landscape. We have a pond, so we've

1:30:46.080 --> 1:30:50.960
<v Speaker 5>got the water, got to have that. We have a dog,

1:30:52.640 --> 1:30:56.200
<v Speaker 5>and we have a white horse. They're all there, All

1:30:56.240 --> 1:30:59.800
<v Speaker 5>our main characters are here. We also have actual people,

1:31:00.600 --> 1:31:05.479
<v Speaker 5>and they're doing that thing that Tarkovsky characters often do

1:31:06.400 --> 1:31:09.439
<v Speaker 5>and do a lot in this film, which is looking

1:31:09.600 --> 1:31:12.640
<v Speaker 5>back at the camera, looking at us, often kind of

1:31:12.680 --> 1:31:15.960
<v Speaker 5>breaking the fourth wall, and it gives us that sense

1:31:16.040 --> 1:31:19.559
<v Speaker 5>of the point of view of a dreamer, the point

1:31:19.560 --> 1:31:22.920
<v Speaker 5>of view of someone who is having a memory. And

1:31:23.080 --> 1:31:28.519
<v Speaker 5>it even ends with a freeze frame. And this is

1:31:28.560 --> 1:31:31.360
<v Speaker 5>something Tarkovsky has done in other films, and he's done

1:31:31.360 --> 1:31:34.240
<v Speaker 5>in other films in this marathon. Now, I can't completely

1:31:34.360 --> 1:31:37.479
<v Speaker 5>rely on my notes here, but I know that in

1:31:37.560 --> 1:31:40.080
<v Speaker 5>other films I have written down, Wait a second, is

1:31:40.120 --> 1:31:42.160
<v Speaker 5>that a subtle? Is that a freeze frame there? And

1:31:42.240 --> 1:31:44.240
<v Speaker 5>I went back to my notes for Stalker and I

1:31:44.320 --> 1:31:45.920
<v Speaker 5>swear to God and my notes for Stoker I have

1:31:46.960 --> 1:31:48.880
<v Speaker 5>does it freeze frame on them?

1:31:49.080 --> 1:31:49.960
<v Speaker 3>Just before the rain?

1:31:50.680 --> 1:31:52.920
<v Speaker 5>And then I went back to Andre Rubelev and Josh

1:31:53.000 --> 1:31:55.479
<v Speaker 5>I would not have copied and pasted this for any reason,

1:31:55.800 --> 1:31:58.719
<v Speaker 5>It says, does it freeze frame on them just before

1:31:58.800 --> 1:32:02.559
<v Speaker 5>the rain? So is it possible that exactly the same moment,

1:32:02.640 --> 1:32:05.840
<v Speaker 5>there's a freeze frame before rain starts to fall in

1:32:06.000 --> 1:32:08.280
<v Speaker 5>those two films, and here again he uses a freeze frame.

1:32:08.360 --> 1:32:12.960
<v Speaker 5>So it's all of these Tarkovsky images and ideas kind

1:32:13.000 --> 1:32:15.240
<v Speaker 5>of co mingling just at the beginning of the film,

1:32:15.280 --> 1:32:19.040
<v Speaker 5>and it's it's haunting and it's beautiful, and I felt

1:32:19.080 --> 1:32:21.760
<v Speaker 5>like I was right in the headspace I needed to

1:32:21.800 --> 1:32:25.720
<v Speaker 5>be in at the beginning of this film. The other

1:32:25.840 --> 1:32:28.360
<v Speaker 5>thing that I guess I'm going to keep harping on

1:32:28.560 --> 1:32:32.400
<v Speaker 5>because he is going to keep harping on it the

1:32:32.520 --> 1:32:36.160
<v Speaker 5>character of the Holy Fool that this movie is largely

1:32:36.240 --> 1:32:40.720
<v Speaker 5>built around. We meet Domenico, and here we get a

1:32:40.840 --> 1:32:43.400
<v Speaker 5>great definition of it. I think if you're going to

1:32:44.280 --> 1:32:50.080
<v Speaker 5>ask ultimately what Tarkovsky means by the Holy Fool, we

1:32:50.280 --> 1:32:56.839
<v Speaker 5>have the main character Andre Gorchakov. We have his definition

1:32:56.960 --> 1:33:03.880
<v Speaker 5>what he says to Eugenia, says, they're troublesome, inconvenient, they're alone,

1:33:04.520 --> 1:33:07.920
<v Speaker 5>but they're certainly closer to the truth. I think that

1:33:08.120 --> 1:33:12.240
<v Speaker 5>goes for Andre Rublev, that goes for the main character

1:33:12.320 --> 1:33:14.880
<v Speaker 5>in Stalker. It goes for other characters that we've seen

1:33:15.320 --> 1:33:21.519
<v Speaker 5>throughout this entire marathon. And isn't that ultimately, by the

1:33:21.680 --> 1:33:23.880
<v Speaker 5>end of this film, we're gonna jump ahead. We have

1:33:24.000 --> 1:33:25.960
<v Speaker 5>to get to the end of this film. By the

1:33:26.080 --> 1:33:28.720
<v Speaker 5>end of this movie, isn't that ultimately what we see

1:33:28.800 --> 1:33:33.719
<v Speaker 5>Gortchakov become. Now what happens to our actual holy fool,

1:33:33.920 --> 1:33:36.120
<v Speaker 5>the character who starts as our holy fool, Well, that's

1:33:36.720 --> 1:33:41.440
<v Speaker 5>that's a pretty awful demise. Yeah, And the way Tarkovsky

1:33:41.560 --> 1:33:45.400
<v Speaker 5>depicts it is horrific. In the sound design, he cuts

1:33:45.439 --> 1:33:48.240
<v Speaker 5>out the music Beethoven at one point to give us

1:33:48.720 --> 1:33:52.800
<v Speaker 5>the screams we hear, the screams of pain as he

1:33:53.920 --> 1:33:58.000
<v Speaker 5>has self immolated. And yet Tarkovsky finds a way to

1:33:58.920 --> 1:34:02.439
<v Speaker 5>go from some thing terrible, something brutal, to something kind

1:34:02.479 --> 1:34:05.880
<v Speaker 5>of beautiful, the flames that have engulfed him to the

1:34:05.960 --> 1:34:09.320
<v Speaker 5>flame of the candle, almost a match cut the flame

1:34:09.360 --> 1:34:12.400
<v Speaker 5>of the candle that Andrea is holding as he is

1:34:12.479 --> 1:34:14.880
<v Speaker 5>now going to try to do what Domenico asked him

1:34:14.920 --> 1:34:18.479
<v Speaker 5>to do, which is show his faith walk across the

1:34:18.560 --> 1:34:23.200
<v Speaker 5>water with this candle. And at first I thought, I thought,

1:34:23.280 --> 1:34:27.479
<v Speaker 5>is this another case of Tarkowski asking us as an

1:34:27.520 --> 1:34:31.439
<v Speaker 5>audience to have a certain amount of faith ourselves, because

1:34:32.200 --> 1:34:34.839
<v Speaker 5>it seems like he's walking across the water pretty easily,

1:34:35.000 --> 1:34:36.880
<v Speaker 5>but we don't see his legs and we don't really

1:34:36.920 --> 1:34:39.200
<v Speaker 5>see a wide shot, and so is he doing it

1:34:39.960 --> 1:34:42.439
<v Speaker 5>or is he not doing it? And then you realize, well, okay,

1:34:42.479 --> 1:34:45.559
<v Speaker 5>it's all dried up and so there's really no water there,

1:34:45.960 --> 1:34:48.720
<v Speaker 5>and so it's a little bit of an easy way out,

1:34:49.080 --> 1:34:51.599
<v Speaker 5>but it's not so much of an easy way out

1:34:51.640 --> 1:34:55.240
<v Speaker 5>because he still has to walk across and keep that

1:34:55.400 --> 1:34:59.000
<v Speaker 5>flame intact. And I don't know how long that sequence is,

1:34:59.120 --> 1:35:01.360
<v Speaker 5>but it feels like I didn't have time to go

1:35:01.479 --> 1:35:04.120
<v Speaker 5>back in time. It Josh, that's a long sequence. Okay,

1:35:04.160 --> 1:35:06.920
<v Speaker 5>seven minutes. It feels like an unbroken take has to

1:35:07.000 --> 1:35:09.960
<v Speaker 5>be an unbroken take, right, we have to we have

1:35:10.080 --> 1:35:13.400
<v Speaker 5>to experience that entire journey. That has to feel like

1:35:13.479 --> 1:35:18.599
<v Speaker 5>his entire lifespan shrunken down to seven minutes. And it does. Yeah,

1:35:18.800 --> 1:35:23.479
<v Speaker 5>And as he walks across, he ultimately gets across, and

1:35:23.520 --> 1:35:28.799
<v Speaker 5>I think in that moment does finally prove that he believes,

1:35:29.479 --> 1:35:33.000
<v Speaker 5>proves his faith. And for me, that felt like that

1:35:33.360 --> 1:35:36.960
<v Speaker 5>ending felt to me as close to the pinnacle or

1:35:37.040 --> 1:35:41.040
<v Speaker 5>the ideal of a Tarkovsky ending as you could possibly have.

1:35:41.560 --> 1:35:44.800
<v Speaker 7>It's an astonishing sequence that is comprised of, yes, little

1:35:44.840 --> 1:35:47.439
<v Speaker 7>more than this man trudging across the length of a

1:35:47.560 --> 1:35:52.120
<v Speaker 7>drained natural pool with a candle, hoping it won't go

1:35:52.200 --> 1:35:55.280
<v Speaker 7>out because of the wind coming through or whatever. Yeah,

1:35:55.560 --> 1:35:57.160
<v Speaker 7>this would have been my scene of the year if

1:35:57.200 --> 1:35:59.000
<v Speaker 7>it came out in nineteen eighty three. It's just one

1:35:59.040 --> 1:36:05.920
<v Speaker 7>of these sustained but quiet instances of slow cinema being

1:36:06.000 --> 1:36:09.479
<v Speaker 7>mesmerized by that and you get lost in the effort.

1:36:09.560 --> 1:36:12.160
<v Speaker 7>You get Time takes on a different meaning if you

1:36:12.280 --> 1:36:18.200
<v Speaker 7>allow yourself to give into it. Is it him expressing

1:36:18.400 --> 1:36:22.800
<v Speaker 7>his faith? I can see that I'm still uncertain of

1:36:22.920 --> 1:36:25.759
<v Speaker 7>what's going on in that scene, even though I submit

1:36:25.880 --> 1:36:28.400
<v Speaker 7>to its power. I think that I think that would

1:36:28.439 --> 1:36:31.240
<v Speaker 7>make sense. This is something the Holy fool has asked

1:36:31.320 --> 1:36:34.880
<v Speaker 7>him to do. It is something that he didn't do.

1:36:35.080 --> 1:36:36.680
<v Speaker 7>I forget if he tells him at one point that

1:36:36.760 --> 1:36:38.920
<v Speaker 7>he did it before he's done it. I suggests that

1:36:39.040 --> 1:36:41.080
<v Speaker 7>he suggests that he's done and he has it, So

1:36:41.320 --> 1:36:44.680
<v Speaker 7>it is he's he's circling back to follow through on

1:36:44.800 --> 1:36:49.479
<v Speaker 7>something he promised, which is interesting, and yeah, what is

1:36:50.200 --> 1:36:54.479
<v Speaker 7>maybe this is him entering the room to bring it

1:36:54.600 --> 1:36:58.160
<v Speaker 7>back to Stalker is by doing this, he's taking that

1:36:58.320 --> 1:37:01.479
<v Speaker 7>step that the writer and the professor wouldn't take. So

1:37:01.680 --> 1:37:04.960
<v Speaker 7>that coincides with what you're talking about in terms of

1:37:05.000 --> 1:37:07.439
<v Speaker 7>an expression of faith. So yeah, I like that, but

1:37:07.560 --> 1:37:11.840
<v Speaker 7>it is also his last I read it as his

1:37:12.120 --> 1:37:15.400
<v Speaker 7>last gesture on earth because I too, and.

1:37:15.439 --> 1:37:18.479
<v Speaker 5>That supports my theory to me. Yeah, he makes it

1:37:19.240 --> 1:37:22.000
<v Speaker 5>that expression, that ultimate expression of faith.

1:37:22.520 --> 1:37:27.080
<v Speaker 7>It also transports him to because it's not literally the

1:37:27.160 --> 1:37:30.000
<v Speaker 7>final scene. What we then get is that like it

1:37:30.160 --> 1:37:32.120
<v Speaker 7>is a freeze frame shot, I think, but the camera

1:37:32.439 --> 1:37:36.840
<v Speaker 7>is still pulling back again. One of these definitive Tarkowsky

1:37:36.920 --> 1:37:39.439
<v Speaker 7>images that you know, if you just google his name,

1:37:39.600 --> 1:37:41.600
<v Speaker 7>it's one of the images that will come credible of

1:37:42.320 --> 1:37:44.479
<v Speaker 7>the poet. This is we're in black and white. Now,

1:37:44.520 --> 1:37:46.160
<v Speaker 7>we haven't really talked about the shifts too much of

1:37:46.280 --> 1:37:47.960
<v Speaker 7>color and black and white, but we're in black and white,

1:37:47.960 --> 1:37:51.160
<v Speaker 7>which has been suggested to be his visions or dreams

1:37:51.240 --> 1:37:54.880
<v Speaker 7>or memories, and the shack we've seen in these visions

1:37:54.920 --> 1:37:58.320
<v Speaker 7>and dreams and memories is there yet it is somehow

1:37:58.479 --> 1:38:02.840
<v Speaker 7>inside this abandoned abby I've described which quick note and

1:38:03.160 --> 1:38:05.120
<v Speaker 7>speaking of you know as it came up earlier in

1:38:05.160 --> 1:38:07.519
<v Speaker 7>the show Debi iron Off on a thirtieth anniversary trip.

1:38:07.600 --> 1:38:10.880
<v Speaker 7>Tenth anniversary trip was to Italy and we went to

1:38:10.960 --> 1:38:14.600
<v Speaker 7>this abbey, son Gealganok Abbey. Yeah, it is one of

1:38:14.800 --> 1:38:20.280
<v Speaker 7>the most unsettling places I've been on Earth, in the

1:38:20.479 --> 1:38:23.640
<v Speaker 7>sense that you don't know what it's supposed to be

1:38:24.240 --> 1:38:26.840
<v Speaker 7>because it is completely It has this edifice. It is

1:38:26.880 --> 1:38:28.920
<v Speaker 7>an abbey, but it looks like a cathedral. It wasn't

1:38:28.920 --> 1:38:30.880
<v Speaker 7>a cathedral. It was, you know, a place where monks

1:38:30.880 --> 1:38:33.080
<v Speaker 7>worshiped and lived, but it has the edifice of a

1:38:33.160 --> 1:38:37.560
<v Speaker 7>massive cathedral, and yet nature has taken over inside and

1:38:37.600 --> 1:38:40.760
<v Speaker 7>there's no roof. And it's just so perfect that a

1:38:40.800 --> 1:38:43.280
<v Speaker 7>place like that would show up in a Tarkaff movie

1:38:43.360 --> 1:38:45.040
<v Speaker 7>because it exists here on Earth, but it seems like

1:38:45.040 --> 1:38:47.280
<v Speaker 7>it'd be one of these art installations he would create

1:38:47.400 --> 1:38:50.280
<v Speaker 7>for one of his movies at any rate. At this shot,

1:38:50.720 --> 1:38:53.320
<v Speaker 7>we have the poet sitting in the middle of this abbey.

1:38:53.760 --> 1:38:56.720
<v Speaker 7>Miniature work had to be involved to get this, to

1:38:57.000 --> 1:38:59.280
<v Speaker 7>pull this off, and he's sitting there with the dog

1:38:59.680 --> 1:39:03.519
<v Speaker 7>again looking at the camera. Snow begins to fall. So

1:39:03.680 --> 1:39:06.840
<v Speaker 7>here's the question, as you described the earlier image like that,

1:39:07.479 --> 1:39:10.800
<v Speaker 7>if he's been the viewer previously in these visions, when

1:39:10.920 --> 1:39:13.519
<v Speaker 7>characters look back, we assume they're looking back at him,

1:39:13.840 --> 1:39:16.040
<v Speaker 7>even though they're looking at us. Now he is looking

1:39:16.120 --> 1:39:16.479
<v Speaker 7>at us.

1:39:17.560 --> 1:39:18.760
<v Speaker 3>Is that you know?

1:39:18.840 --> 1:39:20.680
<v Speaker 7>I think we talked about this in Stalker? Is that

1:39:20.880 --> 1:39:24.680
<v Speaker 7>the point where Tarkowsky is now challenging us? What are

1:39:24.760 --> 1:39:28.839
<v Speaker 7>you going to do with this presence that's been presented

1:39:28.920 --> 1:39:31.320
<v Speaker 7>to you? What is your response going to be? Is

1:39:31.400 --> 1:39:33.000
<v Speaker 7>that what the poet is saying to us as the

1:39:33.080 --> 1:39:36.519
<v Speaker 7>only viewers left? But also where is he now? Is

1:39:37.360 --> 1:39:40.240
<v Speaker 7>he in his memories? Is he in his visions? Because

1:39:40.360 --> 1:39:42.479
<v Speaker 7>we both read it as that he has died in

1:39:42.640 --> 1:39:46.360
<v Speaker 7>that pool. Yes, so thematically, there's so many possibilities. It's

1:39:46.520 --> 1:39:50.200
<v Speaker 7>just as a composition of its own, it's a master work.

1:39:50.360 --> 1:39:53.240
<v Speaker 5>Well yeah, just purely as a composition. You're exactly right.

1:39:53.760 --> 1:39:58.280
<v Speaker 5>But I'm reading it as he is transcending whatever plane

1:39:58.320 --> 1:40:01.000
<v Speaker 5>of existence he's on when he's in the pool, he

1:40:01.200 --> 1:40:05.720
<v Speaker 5>is into another realm, whatever you want to characterize that

1:40:05.840 --> 1:40:08.040
<v Speaker 5>realm as, whatever name you want to put on it.

1:40:08.360 --> 1:40:11.479
<v Speaker 5>I do associate it, I suppose, with a sort of

1:40:12.000 --> 1:40:15.400
<v Speaker 5>heaven in the sense that it it seems to be

1:40:15.600 --> 1:40:19.080
<v Speaker 5>based on how we can find parallels with the other

1:40:19.200 --> 1:40:22.920
<v Speaker 5>imagery and with the dog there in the water and

1:40:23.040 --> 1:40:25.320
<v Speaker 5>the home. It feels like it's his childhood home. It

1:40:25.360 --> 1:40:28.040
<v Speaker 5>feels like it's that nostalgic, warm place.

1:40:28.120 --> 1:40:28.280
<v Speaker 2>Now.

1:40:28.320 --> 1:40:30.439
<v Speaker 5>I don't know what to do with the abbey and

1:40:30.520 --> 1:40:33.560
<v Speaker 5>what it's wrapped in, I really I don't fully, but

1:40:33.720 --> 1:40:37.200
<v Speaker 5>it feels like it feels like it is comforting to

1:40:37.360 --> 1:40:40.080
<v Speaker 5>him in that moment. Yeah, and so that's why I

1:40:40.400 --> 1:40:43.920
<v Speaker 5>read that whole ending as as a positive thing from

1:40:43.960 --> 1:40:45.040
<v Speaker 5>a faith perspective.

1:40:45.360 --> 1:40:48.799
<v Speaker 7>And you have to also read these visions as memories

1:40:48.840 --> 1:40:53.160
<v Speaker 7>of his childhood, right, because you know, I don't. I

1:40:53.280 --> 1:40:56.080
<v Speaker 7>was wondering is this his wife that he's seen or

1:40:56.200 --> 1:40:57.040
<v Speaker 7>is this his mother?

1:40:57.400 --> 1:40:59.640
<v Speaker 3>And of course that's a tricky could be both in

1:41:00.080 --> 1:41:00.599
<v Speaker 3>different points.

1:41:00.680 --> 1:41:03.120
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, in mirror there's a figure where it's the same

1:41:03.160 --> 1:41:07.000
<v Speaker 7>actress plays the main figures ex wife and mother. So yeah,

1:41:07.400 --> 1:41:09.400
<v Speaker 7>so that's hard to say, but I think I lean

1:41:09.560 --> 1:41:12.320
<v Speaker 7>with you as these are memories of childhood, right, and

1:41:12.439 --> 1:41:15.640
<v Speaker 7>a childhood home. And yeah, another thing I was going

1:41:15.720 --> 1:41:17.160
<v Speaker 7>to point out, is you were in one of these

1:41:17.280 --> 1:41:21.800
<v Speaker 7>visions the use of camera work. Here we have these

1:41:21.920 --> 1:41:24.759
<v Speaker 7>women figures, I think there's three of them, that they're

1:41:24.760 --> 1:41:26.760
<v Speaker 7>looking at the camera and the camera is kind of

1:41:26.880 --> 1:41:30.639
<v Speaker 7>tracking sideways across their faces. And this is a trick

1:41:30.680 --> 1:41:34.200
<v Speaker 7>Tarkovsky has pulled in other films too, where an actor

1:41:34.320 --> 1:41:36.719
<v Speaker 7>will look at the camera and then the camera slides

1:41:36.760 --> 1:41:40.200
<v Speaker 7>past them to meet another actor. They must run behind

1:41:40.320 --> 1:41:44.920
<v Speaker 7>the camera to position themselves in the scene. Further, so,

1:41:45.280 --> 1:41:48.280
<v Speaker 7>as the camera continues to track, they reappear. And it

1:41:48.360 --> 1:41:50.439
<v Speaker 7>seems that this goes back to the conjuring and the

1:41:50.479 --> 1:41:53.080
<v Speaker 7>breaking of temporal space. We're like, wait a minute, how

1:41:53.120 --> 1:41:55.040
<v Speaker 7>did they were just to my left? He does it

1:41:55.120 --> 1:41:59.599
<v Speaker 7>with andre in Domenico's Dwelling too. Yes, yeah, it's such

1:41:59.680 --> 1:42:02.800
<v Speaker 7>a suttle effective trick. And then in that same shot

1:42:03.160 --> 1:42:06.080
<v Speaker 7>it comes to a still point and the horses in

1:42:06.160 --> 1:42:08.040
<v Speaker 7>there and the dog is in there. I could have

1:42:08.160 --> 1:42:11.080
<v Speaker 7>sworn to your question about the freeze frame. Somehow they

1:42:11.160 --> 1:42:14.800
<v Speaker 7>managed to freeze frame the horse. So we see that

1:42:14.960 --> 1:42:17.760
<v Speaker 7>the women either wind is blowing their hair or they

1:42:17.880 --> 1:42:20.600
<v Speaker 7>move a little bit. The dog moves its position. But

1:42:20.720 --> 1:42:24.160
<v Speaker 7>if you Notice the horse in the background has completely frozen.

1:42:25.280 --> 1:42:29.479
<v Speaker 7>Why how Who knows? But the immediate fact is like

1:42:30.280 --> 1:42:32.880
<v Speaker 7>we're in a time and space that you've never been

1:42:32.960 --> 1:42:33.400
<v Speaker 7>in before.

1:42:33.760 --> 1:42:36.920
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, this entire film feels that way. You said that

1:42:37.680 --> 1:42:39.800
<v Speaker 5>as you were setting this up, right, And there are

1:42:39.920 --> 1:42:43.599
<v Speaker 5>no traditional sci fi elements. This isn't a science fiction film.

1:42:43.880 --> 1:42:45.800
<v Speaker 5>It definitely is not, and certainly not in the way

1:42:45.840 --> 1:42:50.040
<v Speaker 5>Stalker is or Solaris is. And yet you are in

1:42:50.240 --> 1:42:52.920
<v Speaker 5>all of these liminal spaces. The entire film is a

1:42:53.080 --> 1:42:56.439
<v Speaker 5>liminal space. At one point. To go back to what

1:42:56.520 --> 1:42:59.519
<v Speaker 5>you said too about time and space breaking down. Remember

1:43:00.560 --> 1:43:02.559
<v Speaker 5>he thinks it's time for lunch, and she says at

1:43:02.640 --> 1:43:05.760
<v Speaker 5>seven am. We have no sense we as viewers, the

1:43:05.880 --> 1:43:08.960
<v Speaker 5>characters have no sense of what time it is. And

1:43:09.120 --> 1:43:11.000
<v Speaker 5>yes I had in my notes. The camera pans left,

1:43:11.000 --> 1:43:12.559
<v Speaker 5>and all of a sudden you're in a different place.

1:43:12.800 --> 1:43:16.000
<v Speaker 5>The characters are in different places within the room, the

1:43:16.200 --> 1:43:19.960
<v Speaker 5>fog coming in the way when the camera moves. You

1:43:20.080 --> 1:43:24.200
<v Speaker 5>have characters who are in that water in the canal,

1:43:24.320 --> 1:43:29.000
<v Speaker 5>and they're perfectly still. It feels like an alien landscape almost.

1:43:29.200 --> 1:43:33.760
<v Speaker 5>You have missed oozing up from the ground, right, So

1:43:34.120 --> 1:43:36.200
<v Speaker 5>there is something that feels alien about it, and you

1:43:36.280 --> 1:43:39.560
<v Speaker 5>have to almost wonder, like in Stalker, what kind of

1:43:39.720 --> 1:43:42.880
<v Speaker 5>world are we in? Is this the world of the mind?

1:43:43.000 --> 1:43:47.759
<v Speaker 5>Is it an imaginary place? Is it some kind of dystopia? Honestly?

1:43:48.040 --> 1:43:48.200
<v Speaker 8>Is it?

1:43:49.040 --> 1:43:51.720
<v Speaker 5>Who knows? It doesn't feel like the real world, even

1:43:51.800 --> 1:43:54.840
<v Speaker 5>though there are aspects of it that feel very much

1:43:55.040 --> 1:43:58.160
<v Speaker 5>like our everyday world. But all of the characters are

1:43:58.560 --> 1:44:02.120
<v Speaker 5>fluctuating within it and within this time in space, which

1:44:02.160 --> 1:44:06.360
<v Speaker 5>is why when Tarkovsky breaks it in various ways and

1:44:06.560 --> 1:44:10.080
<v Speaker 5>shocks us, it's so striking. One of those moments is

1:44:10.760 --> 1:44:17.479
<v Speaker 5>when Eugenia goes into the church and that I don't

1:44:17.479 --> 1:44:20.000
<v Speaker 5>know what you exactly call it, not a statue, but

1:44:20.160 --> 1:44:21.880
<v Speaker 5>Mother Mary is before her.

1:44:22.160 --> 1:44:25.719
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, they call it the Madonna of childbirth. I think childbirth.

1:44:25.800 --> 1:44:29.400
<v Speaker 5>And when when that woman kneels down in front of

1:44:29.479 --> 1:44:33.840
<v Speaker 5>her and the gown opens and those birds fly incredible, right,

1:44:34.000 --> 1:44:36.400
<v Speaker 5>I mean, it's it's a it's a stunner. And as

1:44:36.479 --> 1:44:39.680
<v Speaker 5>if that wasn't stunning enough, the next shot is the

1:44:39.760 --> 1:44:44.200
<v Speaker 5>feathers from the birds cascading down, floating down on top

1:44:44.240 --> 1:44:49.160
<v Speaker 5>of the candles. That that is also gorgeous, And then we.

1:44:49.240 --> 1:44:55.719
<v Speaker 7>Get like that could happen, but it's tiptoeing towards things

1:44:55.800 --> 1:44:57.240
<v Speaker 7>where you're like.

1:44:57.360 --> 1:44:58.960
<v Speaker 3>How could that ever happen? Right?

1:44:59.160 --> 1:44:59.320
<v Speaker 2>Right?

1:44:59.479 --> 1:45:01.559
<v Speaker 5>So yeah, I guess if you want to use these words,

1:45:01.600 --> 1:45:05.840
<v Speaker 5>it's secular and spiritual colliding, which that collision seems to

1:45:05.920 --> 1:45:09.880
<v Speaker 5>happen all of the time in these films. And then

1:45:09.960 --> 1:45:12.360
<v Speaker 5>we get to the hotel, and I know, especially coming

1:45:12.439 --> 1:45:16.080
<v Speaker 5>off of Stalker, this is kind of almost silly to say,

1:45:16.479 --> 1:45:20.080
<v Speaker 5>but what filmmaker, and I'm gonna say even even better

1:45:20.160 --> 1:45:26.280
<v Speaker 5>than Kubrick, what filmmaker uses rooms and uses doorways better?

1:45:26.720 --> 1:45:26.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

1:45:27.200 --> 1:45:33.439
<v Speaker 5>Ute uses doorways like their portals to other worlds all

1:45:33.560 --> 1:45:38.599
<v Speaker 5>the time. They're constantly these imposing forces behind almost almost

1:45:38.640 --> 1:45:42.560
<v Speaker 5>imposing forces behind characters. As they're talking, we feel the

1:45:42.680 --> 1:45:45.479
<v Speaker 5>presence behind them, like they're they're drawing them in. Or

1:45:45.520 --> 1:45:47.120
<v Speaker 5>what about that shot? I think it's when he's going

1:45:47.200 --> 1:45:51.639
<v Speaker 5>into Domenico's home for the first time and he parts

1:45:51.720 --> 1:45:54.840
<v Speaker 5>the doors. They're like barn doors that he parts, and

1:45:55.000 --> 1:45:57.519
<v Speaker 5>when he does, what's on the other side black and white.

1:45:58.000 --> 1:46:00.799
<v Speaker 5>He's going into a dream, He's going into a memory

1:46:01.120 --> 1:46:05.160
<v Speaker 5>when he opens that door. That's that reality and fantasy

1:46:05.280 --> 1:46:08.960
<v Speaker 5>or memory world. Directly, they're colliding with each other. But

1:46:09.040 --> 1:46:12.880
<v Speaker 5>then when we go into the hotel, that room, that

1:46:13.080 --> 1:46:15.800
<v Speaker 5>room that he is in, Josh with that bed in

1:46:15.880 --> 1:46:19.320
<v Speaker 5>the middle and the light on the window and the

1:46:19.520 --> 1:46:22.360
<v Speaker 5>bathroom on each side of it. Here again, I'm gonna

1:46:22.360 --> 1:46:27.920
<v Speaker 5>say nothing sci fi about it directly, and yet it

1:46:28.040 --> 1:46:30.200
<v Speaker 5>almost feels like something out of two thousand and one,

1:46:30.760 --> 1:46:33.639
<v Speaker 5>the way the bathroom is bathed in that white sterile light,

1:46:34.439 --> 1:46:39.120
<v Speaker 5>and the way the rain is coming in through the window,

1:46:39.200 --> 1:46:42.599
<v Speaker 5>and then of course talk about memory, world and reality

1:46:42.680 --> 1:46:45.040
<v Speaker 5>clashing with each other. All sorts of weird stuff starts

1:46:45.080 --> 1:46:46.679
<v Speaker 5>to happen over the course of that long shot.

1:46:46.880 --> 1:46:48.720
<v Speaker 7>I think that shot, you know, if you wanted to

1:46:48.840 --> 1:46:52.400
<v Speaker 7>give a shot to maybe explain Tarkowski, you might choose that,

1:46:52.560 --> 1:46:55.200
<v Speaker 7>even though it's not quite as rivera as the final one.

1:46:56.200 --> 1:46:59.200
<v Speaker 7>It's this art installation idea where he places the camera

1:46:59.560 --> 1:47:02.160
<v Speaker 7>and lets the production design and the lighting. That light

1:47:02.240 --> 1:47:05.360
<v Speaker 7>you described in the bathroom shifts a little bit, and

1:47:06.000 --> 1:47:08.880
<v Speaker 7>I noticed this time the window to the left of

1:47:08.920 --> 1:47:11.920
<v Speaker 7>the bed. It's raining outside, as you said, and the

1:47:12.000 --> 1:47:14.599
<v Speaker 7>way it's raining on the wall beyond of the building

1:47:14.680 --> 1:47:17.360
<v Speaker 7>beyond it kind of makes the paint of that building

1:47:17.520 --> 1:47:19.599
<v Speaker 7>peel off and fall down.

1:47:20.040 --> 1:47:22.120
<v Speaker 3>So it's it's almost this, you know.

1:47:22.520 --> 1:47:26.960
<v Speaker 7>Esoteric art piece. You're just watching shapes and colors change.

1:47:27.600 --> 1:47:30.519
<v Speaker 7>And then the water is not only coming through the window,

1:47:31.200 --> 1:47:34.000
<v Speaker 7>but it's seeping through the floor in a way. All

1:47:34.040 --> 1:47:36.240
<v Speaker 7>of a sudden, there's a puddle by the bed, and

1:47:36.320 --> 1:47:38.080
<v Speaker 7>then this is probably where you were going.

1:47:38.600 --> 1:47:42.439
<v Speaker 3>But suddenly the dog who comes out of the shows yeah.

1:47:42.640 --> 1:47:45.400
<v Speaker 7>And just it's the same dog from the black and

1:47:45.520 --> 1:47:49.240
<v Speaker 7>white visions and calmly walks to the side of the

1:47:49.280 --> 1:47:51.240
<v Speaker 7>bed and lays down. And I love how the poet.

1:47:51.880 --> 1:47:53.960
<v Speaker 7>I think this is the touch that connects it to

1:47:55.000 --> 1:47:58.680
<v Speaker 7>a temporal space, because initially we might be thinking, well,

1:47:58.680 --> 1:48:01.000
<v Speaker 7>that's maybe another dog, what's going on? We're trying to

1:48:01.000 --> 1:48:04.880
<v Speaker 7>stay in the real world. He just gently reaches out

1:48:04.920 --> 1:48:08.400
<v Speaker 7>his hand and strokes the dog. So it's even though

1:48:09.200 --> 1:48:12.080
<v Speaker 7>it shouldn't be there, he should be concerned about this.

1:48:12.600 --> 1:48:15.320
<v Speaker 7>That links the dog not only because the same kind

1:48:15.360 --> 1:48:18.680
<v Speaker 7>of dog, but to his memories. Because of his response

1:48:18.760 --> 1:48:21.840
<v Speaker 7>to it. It's like he's drifting off now into this

1:48:22.040 --> 1:48:25.080
<v Speaker 7>dream or this vision, and the dog has we've talked

1:48:25.080 --> 1:48:26.840
<v Speaker 7>about the dog in stock or the dog has led

1:48:26.920 --> 1:48:30.560
<v Speaker 7>him there, or the dog represents in this case. In

1:48:30.680 --> 1:48:32.840
<v Speaker 7>that case, you talked about how the dog represents this

1:48:32.960 --> 1:48:35.760
<v Speaker 7>really happened because he came out of the zone. Here,

1:48:35.880 --> 1:48:39.839
<v Speaker 7>the dog is like, well, something metaphysical is really happening,

1:48:40.040 --> 1:48:43.400
<v Speaker 7>because I came out of the metaphysical into the real world.

1:48:43.560 --> 1:48:46.479
<v Speaker 5>The dog almost brings him back into the scene, because

1:48:46.520 --> 1:48:50.679
<v Speaker 5>the way it's lit, it feels like Andrea is sinking

1:48:50.920 --> 1:48:54.840
<v Speaker 5>into the bed, into the darkness. He's disappearing, and you

1:48:55.000 --> 1:48:57.840
<v Speaker 5>feel like he might actually be disappearing, like some kind

1:48:57.880 --> 1:49:00.160
<v Speaker 5>of magic act is happening as we're watching it. A

1:49:00.240 --> 1:49:04.240
<v Speaker 5>couple of their small touches that I noticed throughout the marathon.

1:49:04.320 --> 1:49:06.920
<v Speaker 5>We've referenced a few times, the birches. I think we

1:49:07.040 --> 1:49:10.879
<v Speaker 5>both probably assumed that for them to be a recurring motif,

1:49:11.200 --> 1:49:15.240
<v Speaker 5>that there had to be something in his childhood that

1:49:16.439 --> 1:49:20.679
<v Speaker 5>he was fond of, and he liked to include that image.

1:49:20.720 --> 1:49:23.800
<v Speaker 5>And we have a line here where a character says

1:49:23.920 --> 1:49:27.120
<v Speaker 5>the birches. He loves the birches and the air of

1:49:27.280 --> 1:49:29.920
<v Speaker 5>my childhood, so we must have grown up around them.

1:49:30.040 --> 1:49:33.160
<v Speaker 5>There's a lot of autobiographical elements in all of his films,

1:49:33.479 --> 1:49:39.320
<v Speaker 5>but here, like mirror. He even references the poet his father, Tarkovsky,

1:49:39.600 --> 1:49:42.920
<v Speaker 5>so we have that. I think she's reading his poems, right,

1:49:43.120 --> 1:49:47.160
<v Speaker 5>I believe I think Eugenia is reading Tarkovsky. I think

1:49:47.200 --> 1:49:49.320
<v Speaker 5>we can take him at his word here this character,

1:49:49.400 --> 1:49:52.000
<v Speaker 5>even though it is a character, that those birches are

1:49:52.040 --> 1:49:56.439
<v Speaker 5>something from his childhood, and this is maybe even I

1:49:56.560 --> 1:49:59.200
<v Speaker 5>was gonna say, maybe it's unintentional, but I don't think

1:49:59.479 --> 1:50:03.160
<v Speaker 5>it is. It's just too good. I love when Domenico

1:50:04.120 --> 1:50:07.080
<v Speaker 5>says to Andre when they're talking, Andre takes out a

1:50:07.080 --> 1:50:12.559
<v Speaker 5>cigarette and Domenico says something like, I also smoke when

1:50:12.560 --> 1:50:15.120
<v Speaker 5>I don't know what to say. And you realize how often,

1:50:15.160 --> 1:50:18.439
<v Speaker 5>even in movies, that's exactly what a cigarette is, right.

1:50:18.520 --> 1:50:21.280
<v Speaker 5>A cigarette is such a perfect diversion. It allows you

1:50:21.360 --> 1:50:24.320
<v Speaker 5>to buy time. That's how they function. When you don't

1:50:24.360 --> 1:50:26.639
<v Speaker 5>know what to do, you don't know what to say,

1:50:26.880 --> 1:50:29.160
<v Speaker 5>you can at least stall and light up a cigarette.

1:50:29.640 --> 1:50:33.439
<v Speaker 5>And later after Eugenia has said on the phone to him,

1:50:33.960 --> 1:50:36.679
<v Speaker 5>you know, I have a boyfriend. Now I have my man, Vittorio.

1:50:36.880 --> 1:50:39.160
<v Speaker 5>We're gonna do this, We're gonna do that. There's a

1:50:39.479 --> 1:50:41.840
<v Speaker 5>pretty good sense that that isn't that happy of a

1:50:41.880 --> 1:50:44.800
<v Speaker 5>relationship anyway, just based on how that scene is shot

1:50:45.000 --> 1:50:48.400
<v Speaker 5>and how cold it detached he seems. But what happens

1:50:48.439 --> 1:50:51.439
<v Speaker 5>at the very end of that scene. The camera is

1:50:51.560 --> 1:50:55.320
<v Speaker 5>fixated on her, but we know she's talking to him,

1:50:55.640 --> 1:50:58.599
<v Speaker 5>and there's no sound, there's nothing coming from him whatsoever.

1:50:58.680 --> 1:51:02.360
<v Speaker 5>He doesn't seem to really even notice her. And what

1:51:02.479 --> 1:51:05.160
<v Speaker 5>does she say. She says, I'm gonna go out and

1:51:05.200 --> 1:51:09.360
<v Speaker 5>buy some cigarettes, And it felt to me like a

1:51:09.439 --> 1:51:13.080
<v Speaker 5>direct callback to that scene where it's her saying, clearly,

1:51:13.200 --> 1:51:15.640
<v Speaker 5>we have nothing to say to each other and all

1:51:15.720 --> 1:51:17.760
<v Speaker 5>she can think to do is God and get some cigarettes.

1:51:18.920 --> 1:51:21.439
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, she's really good throughout. She kind of fades away

1:51:21.479 --> 1:51:23.719
<v Speaker 7>from the film a little bit in the middle section.

1:51:24.360 --> 1:51:27.320
<v Speaker 7>But I think I'm not sure if we've mentioned Oleg

1:51:27.400 --> 1:51:31.320
<v Speaker 7>Yankovski as Andre, This main character a really a hard part,

1:51:31.360 --> 1:51:35.120
<v Speaker 7>I would think, to pull off where you're not responding much,

1:51:35.240 --> 1:51:37.920
<v Speaker 7>so much of this is taking place in his head.

1:51:38.040 --> 1:51:40.800
<v Speaker 7>Yet he you know, he's compelling enough on his own

1:51:40.880 --> 1:51:43.880
<v Speaker 7>as this figure to hold our attention, our interests, and

1:51:43.920 --> 1:51:46.720
<v Speaker 7>our sympathy, and especially he's able to pull off that

1:51:46.840 --> 1:51:49.240
<v Speaker 7>long take at the end where it has to be

1:51:49.400 --> 1:51:52.880
<v Speaker 7>all about his physicality and his perseverance. Right, he doesn't

1:51:52.920 --> 1:51:55.960
<v Speaker 7>say anything there. And then Dominico, who you were describing

1:51:56.000 --> 1:51:59.000
<v Speaker 7>the holy fool here Eerlyn Josephson, who would later start

1:51:59.120 --> 1:52:04.519
<v Speaker 7>in Tarkovski's The Sacrifice. Yeah, playing this somewhat wild character,

1:52:04.640 --> 1:52:07.679
<v Speaker 7>but I also love you know, he's notorious, this character

1:52:07.760 --> 1:52:11.920
<v Speaker 7>Dominico for having locked his family up years before. I

1:52:11.960 --> 1:52:13.519
<v Speaker 7>think was it seven years today?

1:52:13.600 --> 1:52:14.120
<v Speaker 5>Seven years?

1:52:14.320 --> 1:52:17.120
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, seven years because it's unclear he thought it was

1:52:17.160 --> 1:52:19.519
<v Speaker 7>the end of the world or was he just jealous

1:52:19.560 --> 1:52:21.840
<v Speaker 7>because some man was looking at his wife and he

1:52:21.920 --> 1:52:24.679
<v Speaker 7>didn't want her to be around men. But he locks

1:52:24.720 --> 1:52:26.479
<v Speaker 7>his entire family up. We get a black and white

1:52:26.800 --> 1:52:30.840
<v Speaker 7>flashback to when the family escapes the home, and that

1:52:31.160 --> 1:52:35.240
<v Speaker 7>I think ties us more closely to Dominico as a

1:52:35.320 --> 1:52:38.920
<v Speaker 7>sympathetic character and not just this raving lunatic so and

1:52:39.040 --> 1:52:41.960
<v Speaker 7>Josephsin's performance, of course helps with that. And as you

1:52:42.040 --> 1:52:45.759
<v Speaker 7>were mentioning the autobiographical stuff, just thought probably worth noting.

1:52:46.040 --> 1:52:47.920
<v Speaker 7>And this is tied to the theme of motherhood we've

1:52:47.960 --> 1:52:51.080
<v Speaker 7>touched on here and there. Clearly the Madonna of Childbirth

1:52:51.320 --> 1:52:53.479
<v Speaker 7>statue sequence at the beginning is tied to that. But

1:52:53.560 --> 1:52:55.479
<v Speaker 7>at the end of this film dedicated to the memory

1:52:55.520 --> 1:52:59.639
<v Speaker 7>of my mother. So you know, clearly a primary concern

1:52:59.720 --> 1:53:04.320
<v Speaker 7>of nostalgia is not only this general notion of motherhood,

1:53:04.720 --> 1:53:07.920
<v Speaker 7>but specifically Tarkovsky's mother as well.

1:53:08.360 --> 1:53:13.000
<v Speaker 5>Nostalgia is currently available vod My Tarkovsky rank list should

1:53:13.000 --> 1:53:15.240
<v Speaker 5>be coming in hot on letterbox. Do you already have yours?

1:53:15.280 --> 1:53:15.400
<v Speaker 3>There?

1:53:15.520 --> 1:53:15.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

1:53:16.400 --> 1:53:19.360
<v Speaker 7>No, because I got to give some time with you know,

1:53:19.560 --> 1:53:24.200
<v Speaker 7>having these it's tougher than it was before, and not

1:53:24.360 --> 1:53:25.800
<v Speaker 7>just because now I've seen every film.

1:53:26.880 --> 1:53:29.640
<v Speaker 5>We will have one more bit of Tarkovsky business to

1:53:29.720 --> 1:53:32.640
<v Speaker 5>attend to when you get back from your trip. We

1:53:33.120 --> 1:53:35.560
<v Speaker 5>have to share, as we conclude every marathon, we have

1:53:35.640 --> 1:53:39.439
<v Speaker 5>to share our Tarkovsky Awards. We need a name. I'm

1:53:39.439 --> 1:53:41.000
<v Speaker 5>gonna throw out the Birches.

1:53:41.439 --> 1:53:41.519
<v Speaker 2>But.

1:53:43.800 --> 1:53:46.040
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, it's I feel like that's kind of got to

1:53:46.040 --> 1:53:46.760
<v Speaker 7>be the Holy Fool.

1:53:46.880 --> 1:53:48.560
<v Speaker 5>It may have to be the Holy Fools, but you

1:53:48.640 --> 1:53:50.720
<v Speaker 5>know what, We'll still take other suggestions, and if we

1:53:50.840 --> 1:53:53.920
<v Speaker 5>eat our special category, it seems obvious to go with

1:53:54.000 --> 1:53:57.719
<v Speaker 5>something like just even the single shot best image.

1:53:58.280 --> 1:53:59.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that might be.

1:54:00.240 --> 1:54:02.080
<v Speaker 7>That might be a good one to kind of force

1:54:02.200 --> 1:54:04.479
<v Speaker 7>us to really narrow in. I mean, we've talked about

1:54:04.520 --> 1:54:06.560
<v Speaker 7>water so much. It could be water image if we

1:54:06.720 --> 1:54:09.240
<v Speaker 7>wanted to at least give ourselves some constraints, but a

1:54:09.320 --> 1:54:10.360
<v Speaker 7>couple places we could go.

1:54:10.760 --> 1:54:13.480
<v Speaker 5>Email us feedback at filmspotting dot net with your suggestions

1:54:13.520 --> 1:54:15.200
<v Speaker 5>and if you would like to learn more about this

1:54:15.360 --> 1:54:18.800
<v Speaker 5>marathon or past marathons. I think this is our fifty first.

1:54:19.400 --> 1:54:22.880
<v Speaker 5>You can visit filmspotting dot net slash marathons, Josh, that

1:54:23.080 --> 1:54:23.559
<v Speaker 5>is our show.

1:54:23.800 --> 1:54:25.479
<v Speaker 7>If you want to connect with us on social media,

1:54:25.520 --> 1:54:28.320
<v Speaker 7>you can find Adam and the show at Instagram and

1:54:28.560 --> 1:54:31.880
<v Speaker 7>Facebook and letterboxed. He's at film spotting. I'm at those

1:54:31.920 --> 1:54:36.200
<v Speaker 7>places as well as Larsen on film We are independently produced.

1:54:35.880 --> 1:54:37.240
<v Speaker 3>And listener support it.

1:54:37.360 --> 1:54:39.720
<v Speaker 7>You can support the show by joining the film Spotting

1:54:39.800 --> 1:54:43.320
<v Speaker 7>Family at film spottingfamily dot com. That way you can

1:54:43.400 --> 1:54:46.520
<v Speaker 7>listen early. You can also listen ad free. Sam puts

1:54:46.520 --> 1:54:50.600
<v Speaker 7>out a weekly newsletter. We record monthly bonus episodes, and

1:54:50.880 --> 1:54:54.160
<v Speaker 7>you can get access to the entire show archive. If

1:54:54.200 --> 1:54:56.800
<v Speaker 7>you're interested in show t shirts or any other merch

1:54:56.960 --> 1:54:59.520
<v Speaker 7>you could go to film spotting dot net slash.

1:54:59.400 --> 1:55:02.840
<v Speaker 5>Shop in that Film Spotting archive lots so link later.

1:55:03.080 --> 1:55:05.240
<v Speaker 5>Last year's hit Man nine to seventy, Apollo ten and

1:55:05.280 --> 1:55:07.960
<v Speaker 5>a half, eight sixty seven, Where'd You Go? Bernadette seven

1:55:08.040 --> 1:55:11.760
<v Speaker 5>forty one, Everybody Wants Some five eighty one. Boyhood. That

1:55:11.880 --> 1:55:15.200
<v Speaker 5>was a film Spotting Fix episode dedicated just to Boyhood

1:55:15.560 --> 1:55:19.280
<v Speaker 5>Before Midnight four forty nine, Bernie three ninety nine and

1:55:19.440 --> 1:55:24.400
<v Speaker 5>more outstreaming this weekend. Fear Street prom Queen. The It

1:55:24.600 --> 1:55:28.280
<v Speaker 5>girls are fighting to win prom Queen, but when someone

1:55:28.400 --> 1:55:32.160
<v Speaker 5>new enters the race, others start to disappear without a trace.

1:55:32.520 --> 1:55:36.800
<v Speaker 5>Susannah Soon from Red Rocket, Arianna Greenblatt from Barbie, Lily Taylor,

1:55:36.880 --> 1:55:41.560
<v Speaker 5>and Katherine Waterston star also Fountain of Youth, treasure hunter

1:55:41.720 --> 1:55:45.080
<v Speaker 5>John Krasinski and a strange sister, Natalie Portman, assemble a

1:55:45.200 --> 1:55:48.600
<v Speaker 5>team for an adventure in search of the object the

1:55:48.800 --> 1:55:52.040
<v Speaker 5>location of the title. We'll have to see or not, Josh,

1:55:52.120 --> 1:55:54.960
<v Speaker 5>it's directed by Guy Ritchie on Apple TV plus. You

1:55:55.040 --> 1:55:56.880
<v Speaker 5>can to fit that in before heading off to Japan.

1:55:57.240 --> 1:55:59.760
<v Speaker 7>I mean sort of sounds like a plane movie, but

1:55:59.880 --> 1:56:01.640
<v Speaker 7>I I don't know how the logistics of that work.

1:56:01.960 --> 1:56:04.880
<v Speaker 5>I like Sam's note here, does this movie actually exist?

1:56:05.080 --> 1:56:09.360
<v Speaker 5>Impossible to exactly now. I know you're curious about this one.

1:56:09.480 --> 1:56:12.240
<v Speaker 5>Pee Wee as Himself, a two part documentary about Paul

1:56:12.360 --> 1:56:16.360
<v Speaker 5>pee Wee Herman Rubens. That's on Max Yeah, very interesting Limited.

1:56:16.480 --> 1:56:19.560
<v Speaker 5>You can see Jane Austen Wrecked My Life. An aspiring

1:56:19.600 --> 1:56:23.520
<v Speaker 5>author finds herself in some austin Esque romantic entanglements at

1:56:23.560 --> 1:56:27.000
<v Speaker 5>a writer's retreat. To be weird if they were Dostaievsky esque.

1:56:27.360 --> 1:56:31.280
<v Speaker 5>Aaron Newarth, our friend says, a charming French romantic comedy

1:56:31.800 --> 1:56:35.280
<v Speaker 5>out wide. Leelo and Stitch, the live action edition directed

1:56:35.320 --> 1:56:39.160
<v Speaker 5>by Dean Fleischer Camp, who directed Marcel the Shell with

1:56:39.320 --> 1:56:44.120
<v Speaker 5>Shoes on Mission Impossible. The Final Reckoning is the big Dog.

1:56:44.200 --> 1:56:47.320
<v Speaker 5>Though out this weekend, Tom Cruise has reckoned for the

1:56:47.440 --> 1:56:50.280
<v Speaker 5>last time, or so we are led to believe. Next week,

1:56:50.520 --> 1:56:53.920
<v Speaker 5>Michael Phillips is here. Am I The Final Reckoning and

1:56:54.040 --> 1:56:55.960
<v Speaker 5>our top five movie stunts.

1:56:56.280 --> 1:56:58.640
<v Speaker 7>Film Spotting is produced by Golden Joe Desso and Say

1:56:58.680 --> 1:57:00.920
<v Speaker 7>I'm Van Haggren without saying m and Golden Joe, this

1:57:01.040 --> 1:57:04.280
<v Speaker 7>show would it go? Our production assistant is Sophie Kempinar

1:57:04.680 --> 1:57:08.160
<v Speaker 7>Special thanks to everyone at wbeazy Chicago. More information is

1:57:08.200 --> 1:57:11.960
<v Speaker 7>available at wbeazy dot org. For Film Spotty nine, Josh

1:57:12.040 --> 1:57:13.480
<v Speaker 7>Larson and I'm Adam Kempinar.

1:57:13.720 --> 1:57:14.520
<v Speaker 5>Thanks for listening.

1:57:14.800 --> 1:57:17.760
<v Speaker 8>This conversation can serve no purpose anymore.

1:57:18.640 --> 1:57:38.040
<v Speaker 11>Good fine, Well, the holidays have come and gone once again.

1:57:38.120 --> 1:57:40.280
<v Speaker 11>But if you've forgotten to get that special someone in

1:57:40.320 --> 1:57:44.200
<v Speaker 11>your life a gift, Well, midmobile is extending their holiday

1:57:44.240 --> 1:57:46.080
<v Speaker 11>offer of half off unlimited wireless.

1:57:46.280 --> 1:57:47.240
<v Speaker 5>So here's the idea.

1:57:47.520 --> 1:57:48.120
<v Speaker 1>You get it now.

1:57:48.440 --> 1:57:50.640
<v Speaker 5>You call it an early present for next year?

1:57:50.760 --> 1:57:52.720
<v Speaker 1>What do you have to lose? Give it a try

1:57:52.760 --> 1:57:53.680
<v Speaker 1>at midmobile dot com.

1:57:53.840 --> 1:57:56.800
<v Speaker 13>Slash Switch limited time fifty percent off regular price for

1:57:56.840 --> 1:57:58.720
<v Speaker 13>new customers up from payment required forty five dollars for

1:57:58.760 --> 1:58:00.480
<v Speaker 13>three month ninety dollars or six months one hundred and

1:58:00.480 --> 1:58:02.440
<v Speaker 13>eighty dollars for twelve month plan. Taxism Bees Extra office

1:58:02.440 --> 1:58:04.320
<v Speaker 13>Bees may slow after fifty gigabytes for month when network

1:58:04.360 --> 1:58:05.200
<v Speaker 13>is busy. See terms

1:58:08.280 --> 1:58:08.760
<v Speaker 8>Panably