WEBVTT - From the Vault: Bicameralism, Part 2

0:00:05.840 --> 0:00:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Hey, are you welcome to stuff to blow your mind?

0:00:07.560 --> 0:00:10.320
<v Speaker 1>My name is Robert Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick, and

0:00:10.320 --> 0:00:12.479
<v Speaker 1>it's Saturday. Time to go back into the vault. Now.

0:00:12.480 --> 0:00:14.440
<v Speaker 1>If you were with us last Saturday, you were here

0:00:14.520 --> 0:00:17.919
<v Speaker 1>for our rerun of the classic episode, part one of

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:22.239
<v Speaker 1>our exploration of the bicameral mind hypothesis and Julian Jaynes

0:00:22.840 --> 0:00:26.439
<v Speaker 1>from from September I think it was originally, and so

0:00:26.480 --> 0:00:28.159
<v Speaker 1>at the beginning of the last episode we talked a

0:00:28.160 --> 0:00:31.160
<v Speaker 1>little bit about what our thoughts about the bicameral mind

0:00:31.200 --> 0:00:33.800
<v Speaker 1>have been since we first talked about this idea. My

0:00:33.880 --> 0:00:36.879
<v Speaker 1>basic take is that I don't think it's correct as

0:00:36.920 --> 0:00:40.040
<v Speaker 1>a theory of where consciousness came from, yet it remains

0:00:40.080 --> 0:00:44.000
<v Speaker 1>a fascinating, comprehensive hypothesis to explore, even if its main

0:00:44.120 --> 0:00:47.000
<v Speaker 1>point is I think probably wrong. Some sub points that

0:00:47.120 --> 0:00:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Jane's makes within his argument are really interesting and may

0:00:50.159 --> 0:00:53.519
<v Speaker 1>in fact have some historical purchase. And it's also just

0:00:53.560 --> 0:00:56.800
<v Speaker 1>a great, fun, fascinating book to read. I also think

0:00:56.840 --> 0:00:59.040
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting how one can you can almost feel like

0:00:59.120 --> 0:01:02.400
<v Speaker 1>a religious zeal for it, you know, like and sometimes

0:01:02.440 --> 0:01:05.160
<v Speaker 1>I detected that in you. Yeah, Well, like I said

0:01:05.160 --> 0:01:07.640
<v Speaker 1>in the last episode, there's this there's this way that

0:01:07.640 --> 0:01:12.760
<v Speaker 1>the hypothesis can make the magic of religion and mythology, uh,

0:01:12.840 --> 0:01:16.520
<v Speaker 1>seem more believable and seem more possible. Uh, you know,

0:01:16.800 --> 0:01:19.399
<v Speaker 1>especially from more of a like a grounded skeptical point

0:01:19.400 --> 0:01:21.440
<v Speaker 1>of view, and uh and it but it's the kind

0:01:21.440 --> 0:01:23.959
<v Speaker 1>of thing too, I can imagine how like I can

0:01:24.000 --> 0:01:27.560
<v Speaker 1>easily envision some sort of alternate future or even an

0:01:27.560 --> 0:01:31.840
<v Speaker 1>alternate at present in which the bi cameral mind has

0:01:31.920 --> 0:01:36.039
<v Speaker 1>become a kind of religion. So anyway, it's a it's

0:01:36.040 --> 0:01:38.640
<v Speaker 1>a It was a fascinating pair of episodes to record,

0:01:39.160 --> 0:01:41.720
<v Speaker 1>and I wouldn't rule out returning to it at some

0:01:41.760 --> 0:01:45.000
<v Speaker 1>point in the future if we find enough new angles

0:01:45.040 --> 0:01:46.880
<v Speaker 1>to take on it and new things to say about it,

0:01:46.959 --> 0:01:49.440
<v Speaker 1>or find some individuals who would want to talk with

0:01:49.520 --> 0:01:52.040
<v Speaker 1>us about it. Yeah. I know. Since we did these episodes,

0:01:52.080 --> 0:01:55.560
<v Speaker 1>I've read articles about all of the all of the

0:01:55.640 --> 0:01:59.880
<v Speaker 1>like sort of popular mainstream academics and thinkers and sky

0:02:00.000 --> 0:02:03.279
<v Speaker 1>allers who are sort of secretly fans of this theory.

0:02:03.560 --> 0:02:05.760
<v Speaker 1>I think, maybe sort of in the same camp we are, Like,

0:02:05.800 --> 0:02:09.160
<v Speaker 1>they don't necessarily believe it's correct, but they're just they

0:02:09.200 --> 0:02:12.160
<v Speaker 1>can't stop thinking about it. I know I've seen Daniel

0:02:12.200 --> 0:02:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Dennett placed in this camp before that he's sort of

0:02:14.400 --> 0:02:17.200
<v Speaker 1>secretly a fan of it. I now have to say

0:02:17.200 --> 0:02:19.840
<v Speaker 1>that among the various ways I try and interpret attacks,

0:02:19.919 --> 0:02:23.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, you looking at it as literature, as as

0:02:23.200 --> 0:02:26.040
<v Speaker 1>some sort of you know, a true story, as some

0:02:26.080 --> 0:02:29.200
<v Speaker 1>sort of allegorical story, etcetera, I also throw in the

0:02:29.240 --> 0:02:32.480
<v Speaker 1>bicamera right mind, and I think, well, what's the bicamera

0:02:32.639 --> 0:02:35.160
<v Speaker 1>read on this? And it's a really fun fun way

0:02:35.200 --> 0:02:37.840
<v Speaker 1>to to to pass the time if you find yourself

0:02:37.880 --> 0:02:41.320
<v Speaker 1>being like bombarded with a kind of say, boring Bible story. Yeah,

0:02:41.360 --> 0:02:43.160
<v Speaker 1>I can totally see how it would play that kind

0:02:43.160 --> 0:02:46.320
<v Speaker 1>of role. I would be interested in returning to it

0:02:46.400 --> 0:02:48.120
<v Speaker 1>some day, especially if we could find a way of

0:02:48.120 --> 0:02:51.000
<v Speaker 1>bringing some fresh evidence to it, anything in in support

0:02:51.080 --> 0:02:53.280
<v Speaker 1>or in opposition. I mean, one thing I would I

0:02:53.360 --> 0:02:55.800
<v Speaker 1>have thought would be interesting is just try to find

0:02:55.880 --> 0:02:59.280
<v Speaker 1>lots of counter examples to Jane's idea that like ancient

0:02:59.360 --> 0:03:03.880
<v Speaker 1>literature is not display interiority, that the most ancient stories,

0:03:04.120 --> 0:03:06.760
<v Speaker 1>people don't seem to have inner minds, that they just

0:03:06.880 --> 0:03:09.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, their decisions come from deliverances of the gods,

0:03:09.880 --> 0:03:12.760
<v Speaker 1>and if you can just collect lots of examples where

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:16.440
<v Speaker 1>that's not the case, that could provide some sort of

0:03:16.480 --> 0:03:18.960
<v Speaker 1>counter evidence to say, Okay, so he's probably not right

0:03:19.000 --> 0:03:21.560
<v Speaker 1>about this part of the theory, but other things might

0:03:21.680 --> 0:03:25.480
<v Speaker 1>might still have some purchase. Yeah. Absolutely, So on that note,

0:03:25.480 --> 0:03:27.560
<v Speaker 1>we're going to dive back in. We're gonna play the

0:03:27.639 --> 0:03:30.799
<v Speaker 1>second part of our bi cameral Mind episode we hope

0:03:30.800 --> 0:03:37.160
<v Speaker 1>you enjoy. Welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind from

0:03:37.160 --> 0:03:46.119
<v Speaker 1>how Stuffworks dot Com. Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow

0:03:46.160 --> 0:03:48.360
<v Speaker 1>your Mind. My name is Robert Lamb and I'm Joe

0:03:48.400 --> 0:03:50.640
<v Speaker 1>McCormick in today. This is going to be part two

0:03:50.960 --> 0:03:54.280
<v Speaker 1>of our two part series on Julian Jaynes and the

0:03:54.400 --> 0:03:58.520
<v Speaker 1>bicameral mind and the origin of consciousness in the Breakdown

0:03:58.520 --> 0:04:01.080
<v Speaker 1>of the bi cameral Mind. So as this is part

0:04:01.120 --> 0:04:03.280
<v Speaker 1>two of a two part episode. If you haven't heard

0:04:03.360 --> 0:04:05.640
<v Speaker 1>part one yet, you should go back and listen to

0:04:05.640 --> 0:04:07.880
<v Speaker 1>that one first. Sometimes we say, you know, if you

0:04:07.880 --> 0:04:10.000
<v Speaker 1>feel like jumping right in and go for it, this

0:04:10.040 --> 0:04:11.360
<v Speaker 1>is one where I feel like you're really going to

0:04:11.440 --> 0:04:13.200
<v Speaker 1>have a hard time following us if you haven't heard

0:04:13.240 --> 0:04:15.840
<v Speaker 1>part one yet, because that's gonna be where we explain

0:04:15.960 --> 0:04:19.160
<v Speaker 1>what Julian Jamee's main hypothesis is and how he arrived

0:04:19.200 --> 0:04:21.520
<v Speaker 1>at it. And then in the second episode we're gonna

0:04:21.520 --> 0:04:24.719
<v Speaker 1>be talking about evidence for it from the ancient world

0:04:24.800 --> 0:04:27.000
<v Speaker 1>and from the modern world. Yeah, this episode is going

0:04:27.040 --> 0:04:30.120
<v Speaker 1>to be full of like falling kingdoms and whispering statues

0:04:30.120 --> 0:04:32.320
<v Speaker 1>and other great stuff, but you need that first episode

0:04:32.320 --> 0:04:35.160
<v Speaker 1>to understand it. Now, as with the first episode, we

0:04:35.200 --> 0:04:39.200
<v Speaker 1>want to make clear that we're not necessarily endorsing this hypothesis.

0:04:39.279 --> 0:04:42.280
<v Speaker 1>This is a very controversial hypothesis. It's not something that

0:04:42.440 --> 0:04:46.680
<v Speaker 1>is at all considered proven or even necessarily very well

0:04:46.720 --> 0:04:50.320
<v Speaker 1>attested by evidence. It's something that is controversial but very

0:04:50.400 --> 0:04:53.960
<v Speaker 1>fascinating I think worth exploring as a hypothetical. Yeah, it

0:04:54.040 --> 0:04:58.080
<v Speaker 1>is a it is a radical hypothesis and if nothing else,

0:04:58.160 --> 0:05:01.160
<v Speaker 1>it is just a fascinating thought experiments. So as we

0:05:01.240 --> 0:05:04.599
<v Speaker 1>discuss it again, you're going to hear us Uh discussing

0:05:04.600 --> 0:05:06.400
<v Speaker 1>it as if it was fact, as if this is

0:05:06.440 --> 0:05:09.640
<v Speaker 1>actually how ancient people thought. But that is just a

0:05:09.640 --> 0:05:12.960
<v Speaker 1>part of our exploration of the hypothesis. Now, to briefly

0:05:13.080 --> 0:05:16.960
<v Speaker 1>recap the core of Julian James theory, and we should say,

0:05:17.080 --> 0:05:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Julian James, when did he live? Nine? Yeah? So nine seven.

0:05:23.080 --> 0:05:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Julian James was an American psychologist. He's primarily known for

0:05:26.160 --> 0:05:29.120
<v Speaker 1>this book that was published in nineteen seventy six called

0:05:29.200 --> 0:05:32.359
<v Speaker 1>The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind,

0:05:32.800 --> 0:05:37.039
<v Speaker 1>And the thrust of that book is, until about three

0:05:37.080 --> 0:05:41.680
<v Speaker 1>thousand years ago, human beings were not conscious. They did

0:05:41.720 --> 0:05:44.600
<v Speaker 1>not possess consciousness and the way we do today. And

0:05:44.640 --> 0:05:48.000
<v Speaker 1>around that time, roughly three thousand years ago, modern human

0:05:48.040 --> 0:05:53.240
<v Speaker 1>consciousness began as a cultural invention, probably in Mesopotamia that's

0:05:53.240 --> 0:05:56.320
<v Speaker 1>spread around the world over time. And before that time,

0:05:56.400 --> 0:06:00.120
<v Speaker 1>for thousands of years, almost all humans were not conscious

0:06:00.120 --> 0:06:03.440
<v Speaker 1>in the way we are, but instead we're unconscious beings

0:06:03.440 --> 0:06:08.240
<v Speaker 1>commanded in all novel behaviors by hallucinated voices that they

0:06:08.279 --> 0:06:11.680
<v Speaker 1>called gods or another way of putting it. And uh,

0:06:11.760 --> 0:06:14.800
<v Speaker 1>and James himself put it this way, everybody was schizophrenic

0:06:15.480 --> 0:06:18.720
<v Speaker 1>sort of. Yeah, I mean, so schizophrenia, as Jane's imagines,

0:06:18.800 --> 0:06:22.440
<v Speaker 1>it is one form or a modified version of a

0:06:22.520 --> 0:06:26.599
<v Speaker 1>regression to this bicameral mind state that used to be

0:06:26.640 --> 0:06:30.680
<v Speaker 1>the norm for how humans and ancient civilizations lived and

0:06:30.760 --> 0:06:33.840
<v Speaker 1>so this norm would be that most of the time

0:06:33.920 --> 0:06:37.440
<v Speaker 1>you would be going around unconsciously behaving out of habit

0:06:37.560 --> 0:06:40.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, you have a stimulus response behaviors, and you

0:06:40.520 --> 0:06:43.240
<v Speaker 1>would have habitual behaviors that you would enact, and this

0:06:43.240 --> 0:06:46.600
<v Speaker 1>would serve to do most things that would be you know,

0:06:46.720 --> 0:06:50.679
<v Speaker 1>recurrent repetitive behaviors over the day. But whenever something new happened,

0:06:50.720 --> 0:06:53.479
<v Speaker 1>whenever you needed to make a decision and there was

0:06:53.520 --> 0:06:56.560
<v Speaker 1>a stress point induced by that decision, you would be

0:06:56.640 --> 0:07:00.720
<v Speaker 1>told what to do by a hallucinated auditor or voice

0:07:00.880 --> 0:07:03.840
<v Speaker 1>that you would perceive as a god, and that you

0:07:03.839 --> 0:07:06.440
<v Speaker 1>would enact that. Now, this is, as you said, a

0:07:06.560 --> 0:07:09.400
<v Speaker 1>radical hypothesis. Yeah, because again the idea here is that

0:07:09.560 --> 0:07:13.520
<v Speaker 1>everybody heard these voices, that this was the universal human experience,

0:07:13.560 --> 0:07:16.920
<v Speaker 1>this was the norm, right, And so obviously I mean

0:07:16.960 --> 0:07:19.120
<v Speaker 1>that that sounds kind of crazy to us, now, like

0:07:19.200 --> 0:07:23.000
<v Speaker 1>what really could could that be true? So if there

0:07:23.120 --> 0:07:25.480
<v Speaker 1>is any truth to Jane's theory, and as we said before,

0:07:25.480 --> 0:07:28.360
<v Speaker 1>we're not necessarily endorsing it as true, just entertaining it

0:07:28.400 --> 0:07:31.520
<v Speaker 1>as an interesting hypothesis, we should be able to find

0:07:31.600 --> 0:07:35.000
<v Speaker 1>some evidence of that theory. And so we can look

0:07:35.000 --> 0:07:37.760
<v Speaker 1>at psychiatry, and we can look at neuroscience, and we

0:07:37.760 --> 0:07:40.320
<v Speaker 1>can look at evidence from the ancient world. And today

0:07:40.320 --> 0:07:42.760
<v Speaker 1>we're going to start by looking at evidence from the

0:07:42.840 --> 0:07:47.840
<v Speaker 1>ancient world, from history, from archaeology, from ancient literature. If

0:07:47.880 --> 0:07:51.320
<v Speaker 1>there was a bicameral mind state, this divided mind state,

0:07:51.320 --> 0:07:53.560
<v Speaker 1>where one half of the brain spoke to the other

0:07:53.600 --> 0:07:56.360
<v Speaker 1>as the voice of a god and commanded the unconscious

0:07:56.400 --> 0:07:58.840
<v Speaker 1>other half, we should be able to see that in

0:07:58.880 --> 0:08:01.840
<v Speaker 1>the behaviors of a people's and the traces left of

0:08:01.880 --> 0:08:05.240
<v Speaker 1>those behaviors. Right, So, a lot of this episode is

0:08:05.240 --> 0:08:09.040
<v Speaker 1>going to be uh, Joe and I discussing some of

0:08:09.080 --> 0:08:13.360
<v Speaker 1>the examples that James brings up in the book. We

0:08:13.520 --> 0:08:16.760
<v Speaker 1>can't possibly touch on all of the examples because much

0:08:16.760 --> 0:08:18.760
<v Speaker 1>of the book, and much of the real joy of

0:08:18.800 --> 0:08:22.720
<v Speaker 1>the book is is him bringing up these various examples

0:08:22.760 --> 0:08:27.640
<v Speaker 1>from from historical accounts, from archaeology, from literature, and using

0:08:27.680 --> 0:08:31.200
<v Speaker 1>that to support the idea of the by bicameral mind. Yeah,

0:08:31.240 --> 0:08:34.440
<v Speaker 1>and one of the pleasures of the book is even

0:08:34.480 --> 0:08:38.240
<v Speaker 1>if Jane's hypothesis does turn out to be entirely incorrect,

0:08:38.320 --> 0:08:41.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, if there never was any bicameral mind, if

0:08:41.280 --> 0:08:44.480
<v Speaker 1>consciousness is not a recent invention. If he's wrong about

0:08:44.559 --> 0:08:48.200
<v Speaker 1>all that, it's still a fascinating book just because of

0:08:48.920 --> 0:08:51.480
<v Speaker 1>the way he pulls in so many different disciplines and

0:08:51.640 --> 0:08:56.320
<v Speaker 1>ranges throughout history, incorporating evidence in such an amazing and

0:08:56.360 --> 0:08:59.320
<v Speaker 1>fascinating way. All right, well, let's jump into it a

0:08:59.320 --> 0:09:01.319
<v Speaker 1>bit here and are discussing some of the evidence that

0:09:01.440 --> 0:09:04.120
<v Speaker 1>James brought up in the book. Okay, Well, one of

0:09:04.160 --> 0:09:06.960
<v Speaker 1>the things that we probably should be able to think

0:09:06.960 --> 0:09:12.480
<v Speaker 1>about is if ancient people's perceived auditory hallucinations that they

0:09:12.559 --> 0:09:15.400
<v Speaker 1>regarded as gods, and these gods told them what to do.

0:09:15.920 --> 0:09:18.960
<v Speaker 1>There should be some evidence of this in what traces

0:09:19.000 --> 0:09:23.120
<v Speaker 1>they left of their relationship to the gods they believed in. Right, Yeah,

0:09:23.240 --> 0:09:26.520
<v Speaker 1>And one of those examples, Jane's argues is the positioning

0:09:26.520 --> 0:09:30.400
<v Speaker 1>of the houses of the gods. So this is the

0:09:30.400 --> 0:09:33.000
<v Speaker 1>basic idea. Well, so today you travel to a big city.

0:09:33.080 --> 0:09:35.679
<v Speaker 1>Let's say you go to Washington, d C. All right,

0:09:35.720 --> 0:09:37.880
<v Speaker 1>this is our example, not James. So I'm in Washington,

0:09:37.920 --> 0:09:41.360
<v Speaker 1>all right, and you seek out the grandest, most centralized home,

0:09:41.520 --> 0:09:43.920
<v Speaker 1>the one that just really stands out from the rest,

0:09:44.000 --> 0:09:46.079
<v Speaker 1>is the most protected it has them. You know, the

0:09:46.679 --> 0:09:51.480
<v Speaker 1>most central status of any other habitat. Okay, so I'm

0:09:51.480 --> 0:09:54.280
<v Speaker 1>imagining it is the home of an extremely tall, thin

0:09:54.440 --> 0:09:58.079
<v Speaker 1>person that stands looking out over the water. Yeah, that's

0:09:58.160 --> 0:10:01.040
<v Speaker 1>that's one one interpretation. No way, that thing isn't a home,

0:10:01.160 --> 0:10:03.319
<v Speaker 1>is it. No, well, it's not a home. But I

0:10:03.320 --> 0:10:05.240
<v Speaker 1>mean that is an example of a of a building

0:10:05.240 --> 0:10:08.439
<v Speaker 1>of prominence with a with a statue in it, which

0:10:08.480 --> 0:10:10.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of gets into some additional arguments that we're going

0:10:10.520 --> 0:10:12.439
<v Speaker 1>to make here. But no, no, no no, you'd expect to

0:10:12.480 --> 0:10:14.920
<v Speaker 1>find the home of a king, right, yeah, yeah, you would.

0:10:15.360 --> 0:10:17.240
<v Speaker 1>That's the thing, right, you would want to you would expect,

0:10:17.240 --> 0:10:19.400
<v Speaker 1>all right, this is the center of the town. The

0:10:19.440 --> 0:10:23.000
<v Speaker 1>whole town is built around this. It occupies a spatial

0:10:23.040 --> 0:10:26.120
<v Speaker 1>center as well as just the center of meaning and purpose.

0:10:26.480 --> 0:10:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Or maybe sorry, that was probably my sexism talking to

0:10:29.440 --> 0:10:31.560
<v Speaker 1>a king or a queen. In any case, you would

0:10:31.559 --> 0:10:35.719
<v Speaker 1>expect the ruling person to live there. But what have

0:10:35.800 --> 0:10:38.240
<v Speaker 1>you entered into this grand building at the center of

0:10:38.280 --> 0:10:40.160
<v Speaker 1>the city and you found that it was home only

0:10:40.200 --> 0:10:44.240
<v Speaker 1>to a quote hallucinated presence, perhaps a statue of that

0:10:44.320 --> 0:10:46.880
<v Speaker 1>presence in the case of Abraham Lincoln, if you will.

0:10:47.480 --> 0:10:51.840
<v Speaker 1>But still for our purposes here an unreal entity, a god,

0:10:52.080 --> 0:10:55.160
<v Speaker 1>a goddess. Um. You can also look to two cities

0:10:55.200 --> 0:10:58.280
<v Speaker 1>in which a church still occupies the central ground, and

0:10:58.360 --> 0:11:00.760
<v Speaker 1>James argues that this is an ect, perhaps an echo

0:11:00.840 --> 0:11:03.920
<v Speaker 1>of the bicameral past. So why would that, why would

0:11:03.920 --> 0:11:06.920
<v Speaker 1>that be evidence of a bicameral past. To find churches

0:11:07.520 --> 0:11:10.079
<v Speaker 1>or temples at the center of a city as opposed

0:11:10.120 --> 0:11:13.080
<v Speaker 1>to the house of a king. Well, the idea here

0:11:13.120 --> 0:11:15.160
<v Speaker 1>is that the voice occupied the center of our thoughts,

0:11:15.200 --> 0:11:16.920
<v Speaker 1>and so to it occupied the center of the town

0:11:16.960 --> 0:11:19.200
<v Speaker 1>or the city, and that the house of the God

0:11:19.760 --> 0:11:21.920
<v Speaker 1>or the house of the gods was quite literally the

0:11:22.000 --> 0:11:24.560
<v Speaker 1>house of the gods. Yeah, yeah, this is true. So

0:11:24.600 --> 0:11:27.319
<v Speaker 1>if I remember hearing when I was a kid people saying,

0:11:27.400 --> 0:11:30.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, be be respectful when you're in church because

0:11:30.360 --> 0:11:32.880
<v Speaker 1>it's God's house. But the churches I was going to

0:11:33.000 --> 0:11:37.000
<v Speaker 1>didn't literally believe that the God they worshiped lived in

0:11:37.080 --> 0:11:40.600
<v Speaker 1>the church. That was just where humans congregated to worship.

0:11:41.160 --> 0:11:43.240
<v Speaker 1>That's not so much the case in ancient religions. It

0:11:43.280 --> 0:11:46.840
<v Speaker 1>really does seem like in many ancient religions, the place

0:11:46.880 --> 0:11:49.600
<v Speaker 1>of worship or the the you know, the sacred building

0:11:49.760 --> 0:11:53.760
<v Speaker 1>was literally where the God inhabited. Yeah, where the God inhabited,

0:11:53.800 --> 0:11:56.079
<v Speaker 1>and then as things sort of go on, the place

0:11:56.080 --> 0:11:59.400
<v Speaker 1>where God may visit, the place where God maybe uh

0:11:59.520 --> 0:12:02.840
<v Speaker 1>contact did so. He draws on examples from the god

0:12:02.880 --> 0:12:07.200
<v Speaker 1>houses at Jericho, the zigarato or which we discussed in

0:12:07.240 --> 0:12:11.360
<v Speaker 1>our Tower of Babbel episode, as well as the city

0:12:11.679 --> 0:12:15.199
<v Speaker 1>of Hatasus, the Bronze Age capital of the hitt Eede Empire,

0:12:16.040 --> 0:12:18.440
<v Speaker 1>and in the ladder this was actually a mountain shrine

0:12:18.520 --> 0:12:21.360
<v Speaker 1>with images of the overwatching gods rather than a city center,

0:12:21.400 --> 0:12:23.640
<v Speaker 1>but he said it's kind of an exception that that

0:12:23.800 --> 0:12:29.640
<v Speaker 1>also lines up with the argument. He also looks to

0:12:29.720 --> 0:12:35.400
<v Speaker 1>the old mec and Mayan empires as Bicameral Mesoamerican empires

0:12:35.559 --> 0:12:39.560
<v Speaker 1>due to the presence of quote huge otherwise useless, centrally

0:12:39.600 --> 0:12:43.720
<v Speaker 1>located buildings, in chief among these the Pyramid of TiO

0:12:43.840 --> 0:12:47.360
<v Speaker 1>Tiwakan in modern Mexico. And I love how he mentioned,

0:12:47.440 --> 0:12:50.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, otherwise useless buildings because this touches on on

0:12:50.440 --> 0:12:53.600
<v Speaker 1>our discussions in the Tower of Babbel episode regarding the ziggurats.

0:12:54.120 --> 0:12:56.439
<v Speaker 1>A lot of our our study of the past has

0:12:56.480 --> 0:13:00.800
<v Speaker 1>been us trying to figure out what was this for purpose?

0:13:01.440 --> 0:13:03.080
<v Speaker 1>And a lot of times we try and figure out

0:13:03.080 --> 0:13:07.360
<v Speaker 1>a practical purpose. You know what purpose did this structure have? Absolutely?

0:13:07.400 --> 0:13:11.199
<v Speaker 1>I mean these building projects consumed vast resources. I mean

0:13:11.440 --> 0:13:14.719
<v Speaker 1>to build the most prominent and the highest and well

0:13:14.760 --> 0:13:18.960
<v Speaker 1>defended building in the middle of an inhabited space. That

0:13:19.080 --> 0:13:22.520
<v Speaker 1>just seems like, why would you waste that on being

0:13:22.559 --> 0:13:24.680
<v Speaker 1>there for a being that is not that does not

0:13:24.800 --> 0:13:28.600
<v Speaker 1>physically need a house. Yeah, unless you are a people

0:13:28.960 --> 0:13:33.400
<v Speaker 1>for whom the voice of God is real. Again, this

0:13:33.480 --> 0:13:35.760
<v Speaker 1>is just the wonder of this theory is that it

0:13:35.840 --> 0:13:39.000
<v Speaker 1>turns so much of ancient history on its head. Uh.

0:13:39.080 --> 0:13:41.920
<v Speaker 1>And and then also you know more recent history, as

0:13:42.000 --> 0:13:44.080
<v Speaker 1>this is all an echo of the past. Now, in

0:13:44.080 --> 0:13:47.280
<v Speaker 1>the previous episode, we pointed out that you know the

0:13:47.520 --> 0:13:50.839
<v Speaker 1>by the voice of the bicameral mind it is it's

0:13:50.880 --> 0:13:53.400
<v Speaker 1>coming in to help you deal with novel experiences that

0:13:53.480 --> 0:13:55.800
<v Speaker 1>pop up, and how it might be helpful but it

0:13:55.840 --> 0:13:58.520
<v Speaker 1>might also be destructive. Well, in the same way that

0:13:58.559 --> 0:14:01.800
<v Speaker 1>a conscious person can make good decisions or can make

0:14:01.840 --> 0:14:05.880
<v Speaker 1>bad decisions, the God guiding the behaviors of the unconscious

0:14:05.920 --> 0:14:09.080
<v Speaker 1>bicameral person, if this person ever existed, could be giving

0:14:09.120 --> 0:14:11.520
<v Speaker 1>good advice or bad advice. I mean it's based on

0:14:11.640 --> 0:14:15.400
<v Speaker 1>the integrated powers of the brain. In both cases, it's

0:14:15.440 --> 0:14:18.040
<v Speaker 1>just that is it consciously happening or is it being

0:14:18.080 --> 0:14:21.920
<v Speaker 1>delivered to you as a command that must be obeyed. Yeah.

0:14:22.000 --> 0:14:25.160
<v Speaker 1>And and along these lines, he attributes the construction of

0:14:25.280 --> 0:14:29.800
<v Speaker 1>ancient meso American cities that are located in inhospitable areas,

0:14:29.800 --> 0:14:32.240
<v Speaker 1>such as you on top of a mountain or uh,

0:14:32.280 --> 0:14:33.800
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of a swamp on the you know,

0:14:33.800 --> 0:14:37.880
<v Speaker 1>on the side of a cliff. He says that, uh,

0:14:38.280 --> 0:14:41.120
<v Speaker 1>that these are areas that yeah, again, we're inhospitable, and

0:14:41.160 --> 0:14:44.400
<v Speaker 1>they may have been abandoned at some point later on. Uh.

0:14:44.440 --> 0:14:46.600
<v Speaker 1>And this is because they were linked to the commands

0:14:46.640 --> 0:14:49.920
<v Speaker 1>of quote hallucinations, which in certain periods could be not

0:14:50.000 --> 0:14:53.520
<v Speaker 1>only irrational but downright punishing. Now that's possible, but it's

0:14:53.520 --> 0:14:55.760
<v Speaker 1>also possible that we in the modern world are just

0:14:55.800 --> 0:14:59.480
<v Speaker 1>not seeing correctly what the benefits of these spaces were.

0:14:59.560 --> 0:15:02.960
<v Speaker 1>That's right, I mean, we're always working with imperfect data. Um.

0:15:03.000 --> 0:15:04.800
<v Speaker 1>He does not reference this, but I couldn't help but

0:15:04.880 --> 0:15:08.920
<v Speaker 1>think of Montezuma Castle in modern Arizona. These were cliff

0:15:09.000 --> 0:15:13.480
<v Speaker 1>side dwellings of the Sinegua culture that were abandoned around

0:15:13.520 --> 0:15:19.440
<v Speaker 1>four after centuries of occupation. Now now, various explanations for

0:15:19.520 --> 0:15:25.040
<v Speaker 1>the abandonment of Montezuma Castle include a drought, resource depletion,

0:15:25.120 --> 0:15:29.760
<v Speaker 1>tribal conflict, and interestingly enough religious religious inclination to move.

0:15:30.520 --> 0:15:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Now you can get into a discussion of of how

0:15:32.480 --> 0:15:36.280
<v Speaker 1>that would possibly line up with james timeline for the

0:15:36.320 --> 0:15:40.400
<v Speaker 1>bicameral mine, but he does point out that by the

0:15:40.440 --> 0:15:43.920
<v Speaker 1>time the Incans encountered Europeans in the fifteenth century, uh,

0:15:43.960 --> 0:15:47.080
<v Speaker 1>there was perhaps a combination of things bicameral and things

0:15:47.120 --> 0:15:50.840
<v Speaker 1>proto subjective subjective. Yeah, and that is one feature of

0:15:50.840 --> 0:15:53.200
<v Speaker 1>his theory that for a long period of time it

0:15:53.240 --> 0:15:56.800
<v Speaker 1>wasn't just like everyone was bicameral and then everyone was conscious.

0:15:56.880 --> 0:15:59.520
<v Speaker 1>You had a long period of the slow death of

0:15:59.600 --> 0:16:05.440
<v Speaker 1>bike emeral society turning into being taken over by conscious people.

0:16:05.880 --> 0:16:07.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, this makes me think of shows like Game

0:16:07.760 --> 0:16:11.840
<v Speaker 1>of Thrones and other fantasy worlds where magic slowly bleeds

0:16:11.840 --> 0:16:14.760
<v Speaker 1>out of the world, because that's essentially the argument here

0:16:14.800 --> 0:16:18.120
<v Speaker 1>is that over time, fewer and fewer people are hearing

0:16:18.200 --> 0:16:21.240
<v Speaker 1>the voice voices of the gods. Fewer people are hearing

0:16:21.280 --> 0:16:25.520
<v Speaker 1>the voices of the spirits of the departed loved ones, etcetera.

0:16:25.560 --> 0:16:28.400
<v Speaker 1>And yet they're surrounded by the cultural memory of people

0:16:28.480 --> 0:16:30.880
<v Speaker 1>who did hear the voices of the gods, or people

0:16:30.880 --> 0:16:33.240
<v Speaker 1>who still hear the voices of the gods today even

0:16:33.280 --> 0:16:36.000
<v Speaker 1>though they can't. So you have this society in which

0:16:36.040 --> 0:16:40.200
<v Speaker 1>there are conscious people who are are constantly being reminded

0:16:40.240 --> 0:16:42.440
<v Speaker 1>that they could be in contact with the gods, but

0:16:42.520 --> 0:16:45.600
<v Speaker 1>they're not, and this, I imagine is very distressing and

0:16:45.640 --> 0:16:48.440
<v Speaker 1>frustrating to these people. And you know, this is also

0:16:48.480 --> 0:16:51.920
<v Speaker 1>interesting in that you eventually have this clash between the

0:16:51.920 --> 0:16:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Inca Empire and the Spanish Empire. And he says that

0:16:55.560 --> 0:16:57.760
<v Speaker 1>this was as close, too close to anything in our

0:16:57.840 --> 0:17:01.760
<v Speaker 1>history as to a meeting of these two different minds,

0:17:01.840 --> 0:17:04.520
<v Speaker 1>of the bicameral mind and the conscious mind, like two

0:17:04.520 --> 0:17:10.159
<v Speaker 1>different cultures uh encountering each other. Um And yet he

0:17:10.200 --> 0:17:12.760
<v Speaker 1>points to a number of different arguments for and against

0:17:13.160 --> 0:17:17.520
<v Speaker 1>the Inca Empire being a bicameral empire. Well, it could

0:17:17.520 --> 0:17:19.960
<v Speaker 1>have been an empire in transition, as many of these

0:17:19.960 --> 0:17:22.760
<v Speaker 1>others were for so long. Yeah, I think basically, he

0:17:22.800 --> 0:17:27.080
<v Speaker 1>says that he believes that if there was a transition

0:17:27.119 --> 0:17:30.280
<v Speaker 1>from a bicameral society to a conscious society. That it

0:17:30.359 --> 0:17:35.680
<v Speaker 1>began in Mesopotamia about you know, roughly one thousand BC. Uh,

0:17:36.040 --> 0:17:38.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, a few hundred years on each side. It

0:17:38.240 --> 0:17:41.639
<v Speaker 1>was a slow transition and spread around the world from there. Yes.

0:17:42.400 --> 0:17:45.399
<v Speaker 1>So with the Inca in particularly, he um, he points

0:17:45.440 --> 0:17:48.600
<v Speaker 1>out that on one hand, uh, the administrative demands and

0:17:48.680 --> 0:17:52.240
<v Speaker 1>politics were probably beyond something that a purely bicameral culture

0:17:52.280 --> 0:17:55.280
<v Speaker 1>could handle. Yet they had a god king who was

0:17:55.359 --> 0:17:58.360
<v Speaker 1>the Inca among them, and there were you know, other

0:17:58.400 --> 0:18:01.840
<v Speaker 1>aspects of bicameral culture as well. Uh. And these may

0:18:01.880 --> 0:18:04.720
<v Speaker 1>have been again to your point, mere traditional echoes of

0:18:04.720 --> 0:18:07.800
<v Speaker 1>the past, but he points out that that you you

0:18:07.840 --> 0:18:10.560
<v Speaker 1>had these gold and jeweled spools that members of the

0:18:10.840 --> 0:18:13.639
<v Speaker 1>top of Inca hierarchy they wore in their ears and

0:18:13.680 --> 0:18:16.240
<v Speaker 1>sometimes with images of the Sun on them. That these

0:18:16.280 --> 0:18:19.840
<v Speaker 1>may have indicated that those same ears, we're hearing the

0:18:19.960 --> 0:18:22.880
<v Speaker 1>voice of the Sun, since the Sun was a god. Yeah. Yeah.

0:18:22.880 --> 0:18:25.560
<v Speaker 1>So he spends a lot of time with various examples

0:18:25.560 --> 0:18:30.640
<v Speaker 1>discussing the importance of eye symbolism, ear symbolism, as as

0:18:30.680 --> 0:18:34.840
<v Speaker 1>showing that that the individual or the statue is somehow

0:18:34.880 --> 0:18:37.800
<v Speaker 1>involved in speech or hearing. Now, one of the things

0:18:37.800 --> 0:18:40.040
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to revisit from our last episode is just

0:18:40.200 --> 0:18:44.720
<v Speaker 1>the idea that James is not necessarily saying that, for example,

0:18:44.800 --> 0:18:48.520
<v Speaker 1>the bicameral mind is not as good as the conscious mind.

0:18:48.520 --> 0:18:51.720
<v Speaker 1>I know, we with our conscious bias, uh, you know,

0:18:51.840 --> 0:18:54.199
<v Speaker 1>would naturally kind of feel that way. But it's not

0:18:54.240 --> 0:18:58.880
<v Speaker 1>necessarily that conscious minds are better or more valuable or

0:18:58.920 --> 0:19:02.240
<v Speaker 1>even smarter. Mean, that's not just that's just not necessarily

0:19:02.240 --> 0:19:05.320
<v Speaker 1>the case. It's that they have different adaptive strengths, and

0:19:05.359 --> 0:19:09.760
<v Speaker 1>so having different strengths, a sudden clash of a conscious

0:19:09.800 --> 0:19:13.480
<v Speaker 1>culture against a bicameral culture could be very disastrous for

0:19:13.560 --> 0:19:15.520
<v Speaker 1>one or the other. Yeah, I mean, this is this

0:19:15.600 --> 0:19:18.480
<v Speaker 1>is basically the the the key example of an outside

0:19:18.520 --> 0:19:22.000
<v Speaker 1>context problem in our world. And uh, and James has

0:19:22.040 --> 0:19:25.320
<v Speaker 1>a just a beautiful little description of how this would

0:19:25.320 --> 0:19:28.439
<v Speaker 1>have gone down. Assuming that this is a meeting of

0:19:28.480 --> 0:19:31.840
<v Speaker 1>a bicameral or partially bicameral culture in the Inca and

0:19:32.040 --> 0:19:35.639
<v Speaker 1>a conscious culture in that of the Spaniards, He says, quote,

0:19:36.520 --> 0:19:38.920
<v Speaker 1>it is possible that it was one of the few

0:19:38.960 --> 0:19:43.440
<v Speaker 1>confrontations between subjective and bicameral minds that for things as

0:19:43.520 --> 0:19:48.080
<v Speaker 1>unfamiliar as Inca at a Wappo was confronted with these rough,

0:19:48.320 --> 0:19:52.360
<v Speaker 1>milk skinned men with hair drooling from their chins instead

0:19:52.400 --> 0:19:55.680
<v Speaker 1>of from their scalps, so that their heads looked upside down,

0:19:56.160 --> 0:20:00.639
<v Speaker 1>clothed in metal, with avertive eyes writing strain ange lama

0:20:00.680 --> 0:20:05.000
<v Speaker 1>like creatures with silver who's having arrived like gods in

0:20:05.040 --> 0:20:09.480
<v Speaker 1>gigantic quampas uh teared like mockagan temples over the sea,

0:20:09.800 --> 0:20:13.160
<v Speaker 1>which to the Inca was unsailable that for all this

0:20:13.560 --> 0:20:16.720
<v Speaker 1>there were no bicameral voices coming from the sun or

0:20:16.800 --> 0:20:20.440
<v Speaker 1>from the golden statues of Cuzco in their dazzling towers,

0:20:20.720 --> 0:20:24.680
<v Speaker 1>not subjectively conscious, unable to deceive or to nar narraw

0:20:24.680 --> 0:20:27.399
<v Speaker 1>to rize out the deception of others, the Inca and

0:20:27.480 --> 0:20:31.680
<v Speaker 1>his lords were captured like helpless automatons. Oh man, it's

0:20:31.720 --> 0:20:35.000
<v Speaker 1>a horrible thing to imagine, as I mean, reading anything

0:20:35.040 --> 0:20:38.159
<v Speaker 1>about the European conquest of the Americans is always like

0:20:38.400 --> 0:20:41.760
<v Speaker 1>a horrible thing to Yeah, you don't have hold have

0:20:41.880 --> 0:20:44.439
<v Speaker 1>to imagine a separate state of mind for it to

0:20:44.440 --> 0:20:48.879
<v Speaker 1>be a rather horrific uh encounter, But yeah, that is

0:20:48.920 --> 0:20:51.760
<v Speaker 1>One of the features of his hypothesis is, so one

0:20:51.840 --> 0:20:56.200
<v Speaker 1>of the things that consciousness gives us is a capability

0:20:56.240 --> 0:21:00.320
<v Speaker 1>for treachery. Yes, that really the bicameral person, and it's

0:21:00.400 --> 0:21:03.280
<v Speaker 1>not very much capable of treachery. I mean, they can't

0:21:03.960 --> 0:21:09.240
<v Speaker 1>prolong a deceptive behavior, right because they can't run this

0:21:09.359 --> 0:21:12.320
<v Speaker 1>internal narrative of how they should behave if they were

0:21:12.359 --> 0:21:15.680
<v Speaker 1>to believe one thing versus how they you know, really

0:21:15.720 --> 0:21:19.320
<v Speaker 1>what goal they'll be working towards secretly, it just doesn't

0:21:19.320 --> 0:21:23.520
<v Speaker 1>seem like that works out very well. But these conscious

0:21:23.520 --> 0:21:27.679
<v Speaker 1>people are capable of extreme deception and treachery and the

0:21:27.720 --> 0:21:32.639
<v Speaker 1>ability to just be jerks all right. Now. Another area

0:21:32.720 --> 0:21:35.840
<v Speaker 1>that that he brings up is that of essentially the

0:21:35.960 --> 0:21:38.560
<v Speaker 1>love to dead. He points to the burial of the

0:21:38.600 --> 0:21:41.680
<v Speaker 1>dead as if they were still alive as being a

0:21:41.760 --> 0:21:44.880
<v Speaker 1>key evidence for by the bicameral mind. So we've covered

0:21:44.880 --> 0:21:47.480
<v Speaker 1>a number of different mommification practices on the show over

0:21:47.480 --> 0:21:49.480
<v Speaker 1>the year. So I think everyone here knows the drill

0:21:49.920 --> 0:21:52.919
<v Speaker 1>the corpse as an astronaut on a cosmic journey to

0:21:52.920 --> 0:21:55.159
<v Speaker 1>the other side. You know, there's some sort of an

0:21:55.160 --> 0:21:58.760
<v Speaker 1>elaborate tomb. Maybe fill that tomb with items that that

0:21:58.840 --> 0:22:01.800
<v Speaker 1>individual loved in a low life and therefore might continue

0:22:01.800 --> 0:22:04.439
<v Speaker 1>to need on a trip. And then beyond that, you

0:22:04.520 --> 0:22:06.720
<v Speaker 1>may even supply them, as we see in the case

0:22:06.720 --> 0:22:11.080
<v Speaker 1>of Egyptian tombs with food stuffs, with with perishable goods

0:22:11.560 --> 0:22:14.600
<v Speaker 1>to to aid them in the journey. And the idea

0:22:14.640 --> 0:22:18.119
<v Speaker 1>here is that if this goes beyond the mere idea

0:22:18.200 --> 0:22:20.600
<v Speaker 1>that oh, well, they like to cheeseburger, so let's put

0:22:20.600 --> 0:22:23.040
<v Speaker 1>a cheeseburger in there as a you know, a token

0:22:23.119 --> 0:22:26.520
<v Speaker 1>is some sort of uh, just a tribute to them.

0:22:26.560 --> 0:22:30.560
<v Speaker 1>It's the idea that that no, I still hear their voice,

0:22:30.640 --> 0:22:33.520
<v Speaker 1>they are still speaking to me, even though the body

0:22:33.520 --> 0:22:35.600
<v Speaker 1>has stopped moving. I will put a cheeseburger in there

0:22:35.640 --> 0:22:38.000
<v Speaker 1>for them to eat, exactly. Yeah. So we think of

0:22:38.040 --> 0:22:42.760
<v Speaker 1>tokens to the dead today primarily as uh, it's something

0:22:42.800 --> 0:22:46.320
<v Speaker 1>representing the way the living feel. Yeah, But no, the

0:22:46.359 --> 0:22:50.520
<v Speaker 1>belief here was that the dead person still needed that. Yeah.

0:22:50.560 --> 0:22:53.000
<v Speaker 1>And he says that this spills over to the treatment

0:22:53.119 --> 0:22:55.920
<v Speaker 1>of ordinary dead as well as royal dead in many

0:22:55.960 --> 0:22:58.560
<v Speaker 1>of these ancient cultures. But the concept of bearing the

0:22:58.600 --> 0:23:01.800
<v Speaker 1>dead in massive tombs, pres irving their bodies, providing them

0:23:01.800 --> 0:23:04.680
<v Speaker 1>with physical luxuries and even food. Uh, this is key.

0:23:04.760 --> 0:23:08.160
<v Speaker 1>And and in cases where there was no food, such

0:23:08.200 --> 0:23:14.360
<v Speaker 1>as the graves at Larsa and Mesopotamia from around that Uh,

0:23:14.359 --> 0:23:17.080
<v Speaker 1>he says there these areas were foodless because the tombs

0:23:17.080 --> 0:23:20.320
<v Speaker 1>were beneath human habitation, so that the dead essentially still

0:23:20.359 --> 0:23:23.159
<v Speaker 1>lived among the living, so that they would wander up

0:23:23.160 --> 0:23:26.200
<v Speaker 1>into the house and you would literally hallucinate them doing

0:23:26.240 --> 0:23:29.800
<v Speaker 1>so and telling you what to do. Yeah. Now, James

0:23:29.840 --> 0:23:32.639
<v Speaker 1>admits that grief could have been the core motivation and

0:23:32.720 --> 0:23:34.600
<v Speaker 1>most of these rights, and certainly, I think that's the

0:23:34.640 --> 0:23:37.160
<v Speaker 1>way we think about it when we're trying to put

0:23:37.160 --> 0:23:39.360
<v Speaker 1>ourselves in the shoes of ancient people. Right. I Mean,

0:23:39.640 --> 0:23:42.960
<v Speaker 1>another very plausible and perhaps the more probable answer is

0:23:43.000 --> 0:23:46.360
<v Speaker 1>just that people wished their loved ones were still alive

0:23:46.920 --> 0:23:50.280
<v Speaker 1>and wanted to behave as if they could be. Now. Yeah, Now,

0:23:50.440 --> 0:23:53.640
<v Speaker 1>he argues that grief alone wouldn't be able to account

0:23:53.640 --> 0:23:57.480
<v Speaker 1>for all of these practices. I mean, I think it

0:23:57.480 --> 0:24:01.399
<v Speaker 1>depends on your example and uh, and you know what

0:24:01.440 --> 0:24:03.679
<v Speaker 1>your experience with bereavement is. I think that a lot

0:24:03.720 --> 0:24:06.480
<v Speaker 1>of his can a test that. Yeah, that that the

0:24:06.560 --> 0:24:08.560
<v Speaker 1>loss of a loved one or even the loss of

0:24:08.640 --> 0:24:12.080
<v Speaker 1>just a you know, I loved celebrity in many cases

0:24:12.160 --> 0:24:14.639
<v Speaker 1>can can have a big impact, a huge impact on

0:24:14.680 --> 0:24:17.359
<v Speaker 1>your life. So uh yeah, I don't know to what

0:24:17.440 --> 0:24:20.360
<v Speaker 1>extent I completely agree with that assessment, but I still

0:24:20.400 --> 0:24:22.320
<v Speaker 1>think it's a it's an interesting case to be. Yeah,

0:24:22.400 --> 0:24:24.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, in a bicameral culture, you could imagine that

0:24:25.560 --> 0:24:28.720
<v Speaker 1>when Prince died, everybody would still be hearing him sing

0:24:28.720 --> 0:24:32.800
<v Speaker 1>into their ear. Yeah, because what is Prince but a

0:24:32.920 --> 0:24:36.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, royal of the modern age. All Right, we're

0:24:36.160 --> 0:24:37.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna take a quick break, and when we come back,

0:24:37.720 --> 0:24:40.119
<v Speaker 1>we will keep looking at evidence from the ancient world

0:24:40.200 --> 0:24:44.640
<v Speaker 1>that may indicate a bicameral past. Okay, we're back. You know, Joe,

0:24:44.720 --> 0:24:48.680
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned uh uh statue of Lincoln to the top

0:24:48.680 --> 0:24:51.000
<v Speaker 1>of this episode. I know, Oh, you know what, I think.

0:24:51.040 --> 0:24:53.399
<v Speaker 1>I think I was talking about what's it called the

0:24:53.440 --> 0:24:55.679
<v Speaker 1>obelisk the Washington Oh, I think you mean when you

0:24:55.720 --> 0:24:59.959
<v Speaker 1>were talking about a statue of a tall, slender figure.

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:01.719
<v Speaker 1>I thought you meant Lincoln. You know this can tell

0:25:01.800 --> 0:25:05.040
<v Speaker 1>slender dude. There's a miscommunication that so easily comes with

0:25:05.080 --> 0:25:10.040
<v Speaker 1>our conscious inability to communicate. Well, you've been you've seen

0:25:10.080 --> 0:25:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Lincoln his statue in Washington. Yeah, he's just sitting in

0:25:13.320 --> 0:25:16.040
<v Speaker 1>that chair, but he probably has not spoken to you.

0:25:16.280 --> 0:25:18.920
<v Speaker 1>And I mean I don't mean that in a in

0:25:18.680 --> 0:25:22.199
<v Speaker 1>a metaphorical sense or anything. I mean that statue has

0:25:22.240 --> 0:25:24.480
<v Speaker 1>not literally spoke. You have not heard the voice of

0:25:24.520 --> 0:25:27.600
<v Speaker 1>that statue. No, But if I were a bicameral person,

0:25:27.640 --> 0:25:30.120
<v Speaker 1>apparently I might, like I could go to pay reverence

0:25:30.160 --> 0:25:32.639
<v Speaker 1>to that statue, but I wouldn't just be paying reverence,

0:25:32.680 --> 0:25:35.919
<v Speaker 1>I'd be getting advice on what to do exactly. So

0:25:35.960 --> 0:25:38.600
<v Speaker 1>that's the next point that the James made, is that

0:25:39.480 --> 0:25:43.720
<v Speaker 1>we have these idols of the speaking stone that that

0:25:43.720 --> 0:25:46.720
<v Speaker 1>that play into all these different cultures. So we've already

0:25:46.720 --> 0:25:49.600
<v Speaker 1>mentioned that, all right, your your father's voice is still

0:25:49.640 --> 0:25:52.560
<v Speaker 1>in your head, like literally in your head. You're still

0:25:52.600 --> 0:25:56.359
<v Speaker 1>hearing it after they have died because of this confusion

0:25:57.160 --> 0:26:00.479
<v Speaker 1>to take place about about the nature of death. So

0:26:00.600 --> 0:26:03.560
<v Speaker 1>your your parents did die, yet you still hear their admonitions, right,

0:26:03.960 --> 0:26:05.920
<v Speaker 1>and then the king dies, you still hear the voice

0:26:05.960 --> 0:26:08.800
<v Speaker 1>of the king. So one of the first humans just

0:26:08.880 --> 0:26:12.240
<v Speaker 1>raised up the corpses and skulls of their dead loved

0:26:12.240 --> 0:26:16.480
<v Speaker 1>ones and their dead leaders. Uh, and after that we

0:26:16.640 --> 0:26:20.000
<v Speaker 1>would turn more and more to two various artificial likenesses

0:26:20.000 --> 0:26:24.919
<v Speaker 1>of those individuals in varying degrees of detail. So we

0:26:25.040 --> 0:26:28.560
<v Speaker 1>we can find crude humanoid figurings dating back to a

0:26:28.760 --> 0:26:33.040
<v Speaker 1>roughly UM fifty six hundred BC in what's modern day

0:26:33.040 --> 0:26:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Turkey and Uh and relatively these are relics that were

0:26:36.200 --> 0:26:42.360
<v Speaker 1>already ancient when the pyramids were built. Now Frasier would

0:26:42.359 --> 0:26:46.560
<v Speaker 1>have classified such carvings as just fertility figures, but James

0:26:46.560 --> 0:26:48.479
<v Speaker 1>points out that that was the horse. He was right,

0:26:48.480 --> 0:26:51.680
<v Speaker 1>and he was trying to cram everything into those boxes. Yeah.

0:26:52.000 --> 0:26:54.119
<v Speaker 1>But but James points out that you you can find

0:26:54.119 --> 0:26:56.280
<v Speaker 1>them in very fertile parts of the world, such as

0:26:56.320 --> 0:26:59.560
<v Speaker 1>what they all metal civilization, and he points to some

0:26:59.600 --> 0:27:04.120
<v Speaker 1>of the areous um attributes of these likenesses open mouths,

0:27:04.160 --> 0:27:08.520
<v Speaker 1>exaggerated ears, as if the statue is going to listen

0:27:08.560 --> 0:27:12.240
<v Speaker 1>to you and speak to you. And in the case

0:27:12.320 --> 0:27:15.920
<v Speaker 1>of the Old Mix, the creation of such idle skyrocketed

0:27:15.960 --> 0:27:19.359
<v Speaker 1>about seven hundred see but Jayne's questions whether this was

0:27:19.440 --> 0:27:22.720
<v Speaker 1>due to the cease of the voices, So did the

0:27:22.800 --> 0:27:26.399
<v Speaker 1>voices stop so that you you were crafting more and

0:27:26.440 --> 0:27:28.640
<v Speaker 1>more of these details to try and bring them back

0:27:29.200 --> 0:27:32.040
<v Speaker 1>or was it due to a multiplication of them, So

0:27:32.359 --> 0:27:35.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, you're having to deal with the chaos of

0:27:35.080 --> 0:27:39.560
<v Speaker 1>all these voices. Now, he argues that many artifacts might

0:27:39.600 --> 0:27:44.399
<v Speaker 1>have been quote semi hallucinatory uh mnemonic aids for the

0:27:44.520 --> 0:27:48.840
<v Speaker 1>non conscious people. So they're all it's also about remembering

0:27:48.920 --> 0:27:52.720
<v Speaker 1>things and um, you know, adding order to life. But

0:27:52.800 --> 0:27:55.720
<v Speaker 1>he argues that quote some of these small objects, we

0:27:55.800 --> 0:27:58.720
<v Speaker 1>may be confident we're capable of assisting with the production

0:27:58.760 --> 0:28:02.960
<v Speaker 1>of bicameral voices, and he points to Mesopotamian ie idols

0:28:03.000 --> 0:28:05.760
<v Speaker 1>from around three thousand bees. He and the eyes of

0:28:05.800 --> 0:28:09.560
<v Speaker 1>these and numerous others were figures were important to focus

0:28:10.440 --> 0:28:13.720
<v Speaker 1>because of our involved dependency on eye contact for communication.

0:28:14.920 --> 0:28:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah yeah, and then it's only left for the statue

0:28:17.680 --> 0:28:21.560
<v Speaker 1>to speak to us and speak they did, uh, not

0:28:21.640 --> 0:28:25.080
<v Speaker 1>only according to bicameral mind theory here, but also just

0:28:25.119 --> 0:28:29.560
<v Speaker 1>according to various accounts. Um Uniform literature he writes provides

0:28:29.640 --> 0:28:32.800
<v Speaker 1>examples of speaking statues. If you turn in your Old

0:28:32.840 --> 0:28:36.399
<v Speaker 1>Testament to a sequel one, there's an example of a

0:28:36.400 --> 0:28:40.160
<v Speaker 1>Babylonian king who said to speak to idols, which were

0:28:40.160 --> 0:28:42.920
<v Speaker 1>known as a terrup Yeah, they're there are all kinds

0:28:42.960 --> 0:28:46.040
<v Speaker 1>of accounts of this throughout the ancient world of us.

0:28:46.200 --> 0:28:48.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is another case of like we were

0:28:48.240 --> 0:28:50.840
<v Speaker 1>talking about in the last episode with ancient literature. You know,

0:28:51.160 --> 0:28:53.440
<v Speaker 1>you read it and you feel you send something alien

0:28:53.480 --> 0:28:56.280
<v Speaker 1>about the characters, and you're like, is that something I'm

0:28:56.360 --> 0:28:59.240
<v Speaker 1>just not getting that's getting lost in translation or were

0:28:59.280 --> 0:29:02.560
<v Speaker 1>they truly alien to my mentality? A similar thing is

0:29:02.600 --> 0:29:05.120
<v Speaker 1>going on with when it describes the practices of hearing

0:29:05.160 --> 0:29:09.200
<v Speaker 1>God speak. You could think like, okay, well I don't

0:29:09.280 --> 0:29:13.280
<v Speaker 1>usually hear God speak. Um, so maybe there's just something this,

0:29:13.560 --> 0:29:15.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, this like a literary device or something that's

0:29:15.800 --> 0:29:18.120
<v Speaker 1>getting lost in translation. Or you could just say, no,

0:29:18.200 --> 0:29:20.959
<v Speaker 1>I'll just take this literally. I'll take it at face value.

0:29:21.040 --> 0:29:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Something was speaking to them and it was the other

0:29:23.600 --> 0:29:26.400
<v Speaker 1>hemisphere of their brain. Yeah, So we get to this

0:29:26.440 --> 0:29:30.200
<v Speaker 1>point where these statues, these artifacts become kind of focus

0:29:30.320 --> 0:29:34.480
<v Speaker 1>points for the voice, like in a way to in

0:29:34.520 --> 0:29:37.920
<v Speaker 1>a way summon the voice even when it's not, you know,

0:29:38.360 --> 0:29:45.440
<v Speaker 1>directly called up by stressful circumstance. He has numerous tidbits

0:29:45.480 --> 0:29:48.560
<v Speaker 1>to support this. Some of the really fun ones I

0:29:48.560 --> 0:29:51.680
<v Speaker 1>found was he adds that to quote the conquered Aztecs

0:29:51.760 --> 0:29:55.000
<v Speaker 1>told the Spanish invaders how their history began when a

0:29:55.040 --> 0:29:58.479
<v Speaker 1>statue from a ruined temple belonging to a previous culture

0:29:58.800 --> 0:30:02.120
<v Speaker 1>spoke to their leaders. So I just love the mental

0:30:02.160 --> 0:30:05.640
<v Speaker 1>image of you know, these tribal individuals coming across the

0:30:05.720 --> 0:30:09.480
<v Speaker 1>statute built by someone else, and it it summons the

0:30:09.520 --> 0:30:11.960
<v Speaker 1>voices just to look at it. You can also imagine, though,

0:30:11.960 --> 0:30:16.360
<v Speaker 1>how if this model is correct, conscious people would react

0:30:17.400 --> 0:30:21.280
<v Speaker 1>very negatively to encountering bi cameral people and and the

0:30:21.400 --> 0:30:23.680
<v Speaker 1>voices of their gods. Right, Oh yeah, I mean that's

0:30:23.720 --> 0:30:26.000
<v Speaker 1>another example he makes is that you have the Spaniards,

0:30:26.000 --> 0:30:30.680
<v Speaker 1>who again are conscious individuals steeped in Catholicism, and they

0:30:30.760 --> 0:30:34.600
<v Speaker 1>come in and they encounter the native peoples and they

0:30:34.640 --> 0:30:37.600
<v Speaker 1>actually reported that the people of the of Peru were

0:30:37.600 --> 0:30:40.880
<v Speaker 1>a quote commanded by the devil. In that quote, the

0:30:40.920 --> 0:30:44.120
<v Speaker 1>devil himself actually spoke to the Incas out of the

0:30:44.240 --> 0:30:48.440
<v Speaker 1>mouths of their statues. So that could just be you know,

0:30:48.600 --> 0:30:53.240
<v Speaker 1>historical cultural slander, or it could be them trying to

0:30:53.320 --> 0:30:56.960
<v Speaker 1>make sense of practices they saw. Yeah, you know, before

0:30:57.120 --> 0:30:59.080
<v Speaker 1>really getting into the bi cameral mind theory, I would

0:30:59.080 --> 0:31:01.640
<v Speaker 1>have easily just said, well, that's just obviously just a

0:31:01.640 --> 0:31:05.440
<v Speaker 1>bunch of xenophobic foreigners from another continent coming in and saying, oh,

0:31:05.480 --> 0:31:07.760
<v Speaker 1>they have statues. They probably stand around listening to their

0:31:07.840 --> 0:31:10.800
<v Speaker 1>voices and they obey the statues. I mean, either way,

0:31:10.840 --> 0:31:13.840
<v Speaker 1>they are putting their their dominant racist spin on it.

0:31:14.280 --> 0:31:17.680
<v Speaker 1>But it could be that they were actually observing a practice. Yes.

0:31:17.920 --> 0:31:20.440
<v Speaker 1>Now again we always get into the same situation though,

0:31:20.840 --> 0:31:24.239
<v Speaker 1>where they was this a practice that was based on

0:31:25.120 --> 0:31:28.320
<v Speaker 1>on an existing bicameral experience or is it an echo

0:31:28.640 --> 0:31:31.400
<v Speaker 1>of a bicameral past. Yeah, it could be either one.

0:31:31.480 --> 0:31:34.520
<v Speaker 1>If there's anything to this theory. Another thing that I

0:31:34.560 --> 0:31:38.560
<v Speaker 1>think is one of the most important takeaways of this

0:31:38.600 --> 0:31:42.480
<v Speaker 1>whole theory is that if James is correct, it's not

0:31:42.560 --> 0:31:45.920
<v Speaker 1>that people used to be more religious and now they're

0:31:46.040 --> 0:31:51.040
<v Speaker 1>less religious. That's not the progression. It's that ancient bicameral

0:31:51.080 --> 0:31:56.320
<v Speaker 1>religion and modern conscious religion are completely different types of things.

0:31:56.760 --> 0:32:00.800
<v Speaker 1>Conscious religion requires an emphasis on things like faith and

0:32:01.040 --> 0:32:05.160
<v Speaker 1>belief and organized systems of dogma. You know, they say

0:32:05.240 --> 0:32:08.040
<v Speaker 1>here's what we believe and here's why you should believe it,

0:32:08.680 --> 0:32:13.400
<v Speaker 1>and so it's like regulated by ecclesiastical authorities. It's addressed

0:32:13.440 --> 0:32:17.200
<v Speaker 1>to an object that is not immediately apparent. Not so

0:32:17.400 --> 0:32:21.320
<v Speaker 1>for bicameral religion. Right, So bicameral religion would have had

0:32:21.440 --> 0:32:24.120
<v Speaker 1>no need for the concept of faith, because what's the

0:32:24.160 --> 0:32:26.760
<v Speaker 1>point in telling people to believe in the gods that

0:32:27.000 --> 0:32:29.840
<v Speaker 1>literally talk to them and appear before them all the time?

0:32:31.520 --> 0:32:34.880
<v Speaker 1>That's right, I mean, the gods are speaking to you household,

0:32:34.920 --> 0:32:38.240
<v Speaker 1>God's household spirits are speaking to you. Uh so you

0:32:38.320 --> 0:32:40.680
<v Speaker 1>really there's not really any room to doubt there if

0:32:40.680 --> 0:32:43.080
<v Speaker 1>doubt was even a thing that your mind can do. Yeah,

0:32:43.120 --> 0:32:46.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, our modern concept of religion you could look

0:32:46.280 --> 0:32:50.320
<v Speaker 1>at as something that came to exist after the disappearance

0:32:50.360 --> 0:32:54.040
<v Speaker 1>of the direct experience of the gods. Likewise, I mean

0:32:54.080 --> 0:32:56.640
<v Speaker 1>could it could heresy even exist in such a world

0:32:57.080 --> 0:33:00.400
<v Speaker 1>like everybody is I mean, certainly you're still going to

0:33:00.480 --> 0:33:04.800
<v Speaker 1>have a structure to society, but everyone is hearing voices

0:33:04.800 --> 0:33:07.880
<v Speaker 1>of the God. Everyone has has their their their radio

0:33:08.960 --> 0:33:11.680
<v Speaker 1>set to the other world. Yeah, I mean, this is

0:33:11.680 --> 0:33:14.680
<v Speaker 1>a world where the voices are speaking to everyone. Okay,

0:33:14.720 --> 0:33:17.080
<v Speaker 1>I think we should look at one more thing about

0:33:18.200 --> 0:33:21.320
<v Speaker 1>features we see of the organization of ancient societies before

0:33:21.320 --> 0:33:23.920
<v Speaker 1>we start to look at some ancient literature. So how

0:33:23.960 --> 0:33:27.640
<v Speaker 1>about the theocratic organization of ancient society. What what does

0:33:27.680 --> 0:33:30.520
<v Speaker 1>that tell us about whether or not a bicameral mind

0:33:30.560 --> 0:33:33.960
<v Speaker 1>ever existed? According to Julian James, well, in this we're

0:33:33.960 --> 0:33:37.240
<v Speaker 1>getting into a topic that we've discussed before, the idea

0:33:37.280 --> 0:33:40.240
<v Speaker 1>of divine kings. What does it mean that the king

0:33:41.120 --> 0:33:43.200
<v Speaker 1>is either you know, the right hand man of God,

0:33:43.560 --> 0:33:46.720
<v Speaker 1>works for God, or in some cases is God. That's

0:33:46.720 --> 0:33:49.840
<v Speaker 1>an important distinction, and James makes that distinction. You know,

0:33:49.880 --> 0:33:51.880
<v Speaker 1>there are two main types of kings for him, the

0:33:51.920 --> 0:33:54.480
<v Speaker 1>steward king and the god king. Right, that's right, the

0:33:54.520 --> 0:33:56.960
<v Speaker 1>steward king, this is where the king is a stand

0:33:56.960 --> 0:33:59.640
<v Speaker 1>in for God and then the god king. The king

0:33:59.840 --> 0:34:03.400
<v Speaker 1>is God. And James believe that both tides developed out

0:34:03.400 --> 0:34:07.360
<v Speaker 1>of the more primitive bicameral situation where a new king

0:34:07.520 --> 0:34:10.960
<v Speaker 1>ruled by obeying the hallucinated voice of a dead king,

0:34:12.080 --> 0:34:14.080
<v Speaker 1>which sort of that gives you, like the you know,

0:34:14.160 --> 0:34:17.960
<v Speaker 1>the succession order, right, Yeah, in fact, you're never really

0:34:18.040 --> 0:34:21.320
<v Speaker 1>obeying you're never really obeying the new king, You're always

0:34:21.320 --> 0:34:25.440
<v Speaker 1>obeying the old king through a sort of intermediary And

0:34:25.440 --> 0:34:27.400
<v Speaker 1>in this he I mean, he even argues that the

0:34:27.480 --> 0:34:31.800
<v Speaker 1>ziggurat centered civilizations of ancient Mesopotamia that in these cases

0:34:31.840 --> 0:34:33.400
<v Speaker 1>it's not you can't even really look at it, like

0:34:33.440 --> 0:34:36.040
<v Speaker 1>the human beings were the ones that were ruling, Like

0:34:36.080 --> 0:34:40.000
<v Speaker 1>the ruling powers were the hallucinated voices of the various gods. Right,

0:34:40.080 --> 0:34:43.040
<v Speaker 1>So it was not the left brain or the dominant

0:34:43.080 --> 0:34:45.160
<v Speaker 1>side of the brain of the actual king, but it

0:34:45.280 --> 0:34:49.080
<v Speaker 1>was the other hemisphere of their brain ruling, the dominant

0:34:49.120 --> 0:34:53.359
<v Speaker 1>side ruling the people. Right. And he also gets into how,

0:34:54.080 --> 0:34:56.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, we've talked about, Okay, you're reacting to statues

0:34:56.840 --> 0:34:59.359
<v Speaker 1>humanoid figures, but on top of this we also end

0:34:59.400 --> 0:35:04.640
<v Speaker 1>up with all additional uh, religious imagery symbology. That's that's

0:35:04.680 --> 0:35:07.840
<v Speaker 1>this used even written language. Uh. He points out the

0:35:07.960 --> 0:35:11.480
<v Speaker 1>quote reading in the third millennium BC may therefore have

0:35:11.600 --> 0:35:15.320
<v Speaker 1>been a matter of hearing the cuneiform, that is, hallucinating

0:35:15.360 --> 0:35:18.839
<v Speaker 1>the speech from looking at its picture symbols, rather than

0:35:18.960 --> 0:35:23.359
<v Speaker 1>visual reading of syllables in our sense. Oh, that's that's fascinating.

0:35:23.680 --> 0:35:26.880
<v Speaker 1>So you think about how reading takes place for us today.

0:35:26.960 --> 0:35:29.480
<v Speaker 1>It is largely an unconscious thing if you're an adult

0:35:29.480 --> 0:35:32.400
<v Speaker 1>that's been reading, not if you're a kid who's learning

0:35:32.440 --> 0:35:34.160
<v Speaker 1>to read. Or if you know, at any point in

0:35:34.160 --> 0:35:36.279
<v Speaker 1>your life, if you're learning to read, you do have

0:35:36.400 --> 0:35:40.120
<v Speaker 1>to think about the constituent parts of words and sentences,

0:35:40.160 --> 0:35:41.879
<v Speaker 1>like you have to sound them out and put them

0:35:41.880 --> 0:35:45.560
<v Speaker 1>together in your mind using your conscious mind. Eventually reading

0:35:45.600 --> 0:35:50.560
<v Speaker 1>becomes unconscious. I mean, I wonder if in this, in

0:35:50.600 --> 0:35:53.919
<v Speaker 1>this bicameral framework, you would learn to read in an

0:35:54.120 --> 0:35:57.640
<v Speaker 1>entirely unconscious way, the same way that maybe you get

0:35:57.680 --> 0:36:03.080
<v Speaker 1>better at shooting basketballs or something in an unconscious way. Yeah, yeah,

0:36:03.400 --> 0:36:06.200
<v Speaker 1>that's so. Now. No, another thing that another point that

0:36:06.239 --> 0:36:10.799
<v Speaker 1>he makes about language is that in reference to ancient Egyptians, uh,

0:36:10.960 --> 0:36:13.319
<v Speaker 1>much like the language of the ancient Sumerians, he says

0:36:13.360 --> 0:36:17.440
<v Speaker 1>that these languages were concrete from first to last, and

0:36:17.480 --> 0:36:22.000
<v Speaker 1>that interpretations involving abstract thought, uh, these are the These

0:36:22.000 --> 0:36:26.520
<v Speaker 1>are modern modern intrusions, and that basically the gods commanded

0:36:26.719 --> 0:36:29.319
<v Speaker 1>rather than created. Yeah, and we'll see that more when

0:36:29.320 --> 0:36:31.480
<v Speaker 1>we look in literature in the next section. Now, I

0:36:31.719 --> 0:36:34.239
<v Speaker 1>I think I made reference already to household gods and

0:36:34.480 --> 0:36:37.400
<v Speaker 1>household spirits. You encounter these in a lot of different cultures.

0:36:37.440 --> 0:36:39.799
<v Speaker 1>If it's not household gods, then maybe it's a you know,

0:36:40.040 --> 0:36:43.120
<v Speaker 1>just a memorial of various members of the family, right,

0:36:43.160 --> 0:36:44.840
<v Speaker 1>And a lot of those traditions still carry on to

0:36:44.920 --> 0:36:48.000
<v Speaker 1>this day. But the idea here is that not everyone

0:36:48.040 --> 0:36:50.320
<v Speaker 1>can hear the voice of the ruling God, right, that

0:36:50.360 --> 0:36:52.719
<v Speaker 1>would seem to be kind of chaotic if the even

0:36:52.760 --> 0:36:54.960
<v Speaker 1>if it's just a simple model of the previous dead

0:36:55.080 --> 0:36:58.520
<v Speaker 1>king speaking to the current king. I mean, it wouldn't

0:36:58.520 --> 0:37:00.320
<v Speaker 1>make sense for everyone to hear that king's voice and

0:37:00.400 --> 0:37:02.880
<v Speaker 1>have their authority. But everyone in this scenario, in the

0:37:02.880 --> 0:37:06.680
<v Speaker 1>bicameral scenario, is hearing voices, So who are those voices? Well,

0:37:06.719 --> 0:37:10.279
<v Speaker 1>there's a hierarchy of God's isn't exactly like because we

0:37:10.400 --> 0:37:13.840
<v Speaker 1>there are different types of stressful situations. Imagine a scenario

0:37:14.000 --> 0:37:17.560
<v Speaker 1>where one is cooking, preparing a meal in one's hut

0:37:17.960 --> 0:37:21.520
<v Speaker 1>and um, let's say you've only got one piece of meat.

0:37:21.920 --> 0:37:24.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you accidentally drop it onto the ground. There

0:37:24.440 --> 0:37:26.719
<v Speaker 1>is a moment of panic. What do I do? Well,

0:37:26.760 --> 0:37:30.640
<v Speaker 1>the household cooking God chimes in and says take it

0:37:30.640 --> 0:37:32.840
<v Speaker 1>and wash it in the river or something to that effect,

0:37:32.880 --> 0:37:35.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, and and it's solved. So that's five second

0:37:35.920 --> 0:37:39.480
<v Speaker 1>rule us. Yeah, So this would be the case of

0:37:39.520 --> 0:37:43.239
<v Speaker 1>a of a lesser deity coming in and calling the shot. Yeah,

0:37:43.480 --> 0:37:45.960
<v Speaker 1>you know. One of the things about ancient Religionny mentions

0:37:46.000 --> 0:37:48.520
<v Speaker 1>in the book that is very interesting is his discussion

0:37:48.520 --> 0:37:50.719
<v Speaker 1>of the evolution of the concepts of the car and

0:37:50.760 --> 0:37:56.439
<v Speaker 1>the bar in h in Egyptian theology, where it's hard

0:37:56.480 --> 0:37:58.799
<v Speaker 1>to I guess we can't summarize it here, but if

0:37:58.840 --> 0:38:00.960
<v Speaker 1>you get a chance to read the book yourself, look

0:38:00.960 --> 0:38:04.600
<v Speaker 1>out for that section. It's really interesting. It's it's about

0:38:04.640 --> 0:38:09.399
<v Speaker 1>the way we're you know, words for theological concepts sort

0:38:09.440 --> 0:38:14.359
<v Speaker 1>of transition into other into having other meanings. Now, part

0:38:14.360 --> 0:38:16.400
<v Speaker 1>of the whole timeline, of course, is that as we've

0:38:16.440 --> 0:38:19.600
<v Speaker 1>already stressed, that the gods cease speaking to everyone after

0:38:19.640 --> 0:38:22.359
<v Speaker 1>a while and then cease all together for the most part.

0:38:22.400 --> 0:38:24.759
<v Speaker 1>We'll get into the details of that as we we go.

0:38:25.239 --> 0:38:30.239
<v Speaker 1>But but then when that happens, there's uh, their order collapses, uh.

0:38:30.360 --> 0:38:33.719
<v Speaker 1>Cultures end up retreating into the jungles, and for many

0:38:33.760 --> 0:38:37.400
<v Speaker 1>people everything has to be built up again. Basically, the

0:38:37.440 --> 0:38:40.839
<v Speaker 1>idea here is that the bicameral mind, this, this whole

0:38:40.840 --> 0:38:44.839
<v Speaker 1>system of hearing voices, this hold society together. This is

0:38:45.239 --> 0:38:48.200
<v Speaker 1>it's it's an instrument of social control. Yeah, and so

0:38:48.400 --> 0:38:52.200
<v Speaker 1>it's it's like playing jinga with gravity and then gravity

0:38:52.239 --> 0:38:54.759
<v Speaker 1>goes away, and then how do you hold the blocks together? Well,

0:38:54.800 --> 0:38:56.960
<v Speaker 1>then suddenly have to come with new novel ways to

0:38:57.040 --> 0:38:59.640
<v Speaker 1>do it, such as gluing them all together, I guess.

0:38:59.719 --> 0:39:02.440
<v Speaker 1>Is so the political organization equivalent of that would be

0:39:02.480 --> 0:39:05.400
<v Speaker 1>what it would be brutal dictatorship. Yeah, things like brutal

0:39:05.400 --> 0:39:08.839
<v Speaker 1>dictatorship have to step in. Uh. Suddenly, you know, you

0:39:08.880 --> 0:39:12.880
<v Speaker 1>have all these wars and just total bloodshed occurring because

0:39:12.920 --> 0:39:17.040
<v Speaker 1>the voices that organized society have have stopped speaking or

0:39:17.040 --> 0:39:22.960
<v Speaker 1>have certainly stopped speaking with enough regularity to hold everything together. So,

0:39:23.000 --> 0:39:25.960
<v Speaker 1>in closing on this, he argues quote that man in

0:39:26.000 --> 0:39:30.279
<v Speaker 1>his early civilizations had a profoundly different mentality from our own.

0:39:30.600 --> 0:39:32.960
<v Speaker 1>That in fact, men and women were not conscious as

0:39:33.000 --> 0:39:36.360
<v Speaker 1>we are. We're not responsible for their actions and therefore

0:39:36.480 --> 0:39:39.000
<v Speaker 1>cannot be given the credit or blame for anything that

0:39:39.120 --> 0:39:42.560
<v Speaker 1>was done over these vast millennia of time. That instead,

0:39:42.640 --> 0:39:45.719
<v Speaker 1>each person had a part of his nervous system which

0:39:45.840 --> 0:39:48.799
<v Speaker 1>was divine, by which he was ordered about like any

0:39:48.880 --> 0:39:52.880
<v Speaker 1>slave of voice or voices, which indeed were what we

0:39:53.000 --> 0:39:57.680
<v Speaker 1>call volition and empowered what they commanded and were related

0:39:57.880 --> 0:40:01.799
<v Speaker 1>to the hallucinated voices of others in a carefully established hierarchy.

0:40:02.200 --> 0:40:04.480
<v Speaker 1>And this mindset would have again developed over the over

0:40:04.520 --> 0:40:08.400
<v Speaker 1>the ninth century BC to the second millennium BC, a

0:40:08.480 --> 0:40:13.000
<v Speaker 1>gradual procession progression. Right, So that's the hypothesized era of

0:40:13.040 --> 0:40:16.480
<v Speaker 1>the bicameral mind, which around the first millennium BC starts

0:40:16.520 --> 0:40:19.279
<v Speaker 1>to decompose and fall apart. All right, we're gonna take

0:40:19.320 --> 0:40:20.839
<v Speaker 1>a quick break, and when we come back, we will

0:40:20.920 --> 0:40:24.480
<v Speaker 1>look at signs of the bicameral mind in ancient literature.

0:40:24.880 --> 0:40:29.080
<v Speaker 1>Than all right, we're back, alright, So obviously it would

0:40:29.160 --> 0:40:32.399
<v Speaker 1>make sense that we'd see examples or the examples could

0:40:32.400 --> 0:40:36.200
<v Speaker 1>be made in literature, because, after all, the bicameral mind

0:40:36.280 --> 0:40:39.279
<v Speaker 1>is uh is, according to the theory, according to the the

0:40:39.360 --> 0:40:42.000
<v Speaker 1>hypothesis here an offshoot of the acquisition of language. Right,

0:40:42.080 --> 0:40:45.759
<v Speaker 1>Jane says, language makes it exist. So could you could

0:40:45.800 --> 0:40:49.240
<v Speaker 1>you look at ancient uses of language to find evidence

0:40:49.280 --> 0:40:52.279
<v Speaker 1>of it? Now, another thing that complicates this is that

0:40:52.440 --> 0:40:55.800
<v Speaker 1>James thinks that one of the causes of the decomposition

0:40:55.840 --> 0:40:58.440
<v Speaker 1>of the bicameral mind into the conscious mind is the

0:40:58.480 --> 0:41:02.960
<v Speaker 1>widespread introduction of language so this also writing ends up

0:41:03.080 --> 0:41:06.440
<v Speaker 1>undermining the bicameral mind. But can we see signs of

0:41:06.480 --> 0:41:10.560
<v Speaker 1>the bi cameral mind in ancient literature? I think he's

0:41:10.600 --> 0:41:13.160
<v Speaker 1>got some interesting stuff to talk about here. Yet again,

0:41:13.360 --> 0:41:15.560
<v Speaker 1>I want to be clear that I'm not endorsing his

0:41:15.640 --> 0:41:18.640
<v Speaker 1>theory as correct, but I do think some of his claims,

0:41:18.760 --> 0:41:21.919
<v Speaker 1>especially about what we see in Greek literature, are fascinating

0:41:22.200 --> 0:41:24.799
<v Speaker 1>and a little terrifying. I have to admit when I

0:41:24.840 --> 0:41:27.120
<v Speaker 1>was reading, you know, I kind of kind of gave

0:41:27.160 --> 0:41:29.920
<v Speaker 1>me the willies at various points to try to imagine

0:41:30.360 --> 0:41:34.680
<v Speaker 1>ancient people ruled by bicameral mind. But when you started

0:41:34.680 --> 0:41:37.120
<v Speaker 1>talking about the Iliad in particular, kind of gave me

0:41:37.200 --> 0:41:39.440
<v Speaker 1>chill bumps. So totally. So, the Iliot is one of

0:41:39.520 --> 0:41:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Jane's chief examples of bicameral literature. So, of course the

0:41:43.200 --> 0:41:45.359
<v Speaker 1>Iliad if you're if you never read it, It's an

0:41:45.360 --> 0:41:47.920
<v Speaker 1>epic war poem that tells the story of an alliance

0:41:47.960 --> 0:41:51.440
<v Speaker 1>of Greek kings and their warriors, primarily the warrior Achilles,

0:41:51.880 --> 0:41:54.359
<v Speaker 1>laying siege to the city of Troy. This is the

0:41:54.400 --> 0:41:58.160
<v Speaker 1>historical event now known as the Trojan War, and Jane's

0:41:58.239 --> 0:42:00.840
<v Speaker 1>claims that the Iliad was develo by a group of

0:42:00.960 --> 0:42:03.640
<v Speaker 1>oral storytellers or bards known as the ao E d

0:42:04.320 --> 0:42:07.360
<v Speaker 1>And that's in contrast to sort of the traditional received

0:42:07.400 --> 0:42:10.360
<v Speaker 1>knowledge that they were composed by an individual named Homer.

0:42:10.480 --> 0:42:13.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it's probably more widely believed now that these

0:42:13.120 --> 0:42:17.280
<v Speaker 1>are the works of many people of time. But anyway,

0:42:17.800 --> 0:42:21.880
<v Speaker 1>that that war took place about twelve thirty b C.

0:42:22.400 --> 0:42:24.400
<v Speaker 1>Or sorry, it was first composed around the time the

0:42:24.440 --> 0:42:27.279
<v Speaker 1>war took place around twelve thirty BC, and it was

0:42:27.320 --> 0:42:31.440
<v Speaker 1>first transcribed into written form around nine hundred or eight

0:42:31.480 --> 0:42:34.440
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty b C. And scholars may believe some

0:42:34.480 --> 0:42:36.799
<v Speaker 1>different dates now, but that's what James is working with.

0:42:37.920 --> 0:42:40.640
<v Speaker 1>So when we look at the thoughts and behaviors of

0:42:40.760 --> 0:42:43.640
<v Speaker 1>characters in the Iliad, it should tell us something about

0:42:43.680 --> 0:42:46.080
<v Speaker 1>the mental life of people who composed and wrote the

0:42:46.120 --> 0:42:49.080
<v Speaker 1>story about three thousand years ago. And when we examine this,

0:42:49.320 --> 0:42:52.520
<v Speaker 1>what do we find. Well, James makes a really striking

0:42:52.520 --> 0:42:55.640
<v Speaker 1>claim about the Iliad. It is a work of literature

0:42:55.760 --> 0:42:59.919
<v Speaker 1>in which the characters are almost entirely devoid of any

0:43:00.080 --> 0:43:05.720
<v Speaker 1>thing recognizable as consciousness. You do not really see introspection

0:43:05.800 --> 0:43:08.640
<v Speaker 1>in the Iliad. There are a few passages which serve

0:43:08.719 --> 0:43:12.560
<v Speaker 1>as exceptions to this. Generally, James thinks that they look

0:43:12.640 --> 0:43:15.560
<v Speaker 1>like late additions to the text or signed or they

0:43:15.600 --> 0:43:19.520
<v Speaker 1>could possibly be signs of early protoconscious thoughts seeping through.

0:43:19.600 --> 0:43:24.200
<v Speaker 1>But primarily, the characters of the Iliad do not introspect,

0:43:24.360 --> 0:43:27.200
<v Speaker 1>they do not narrotize, they do not seem to have

0:43:27.280 --> 0:43:30.759
<v Speaker 1>conscious consideration. Instead, when they're faced with the need for

0:43:30.840 --> 0:43:34.560
<v Speaker 1>novel behavior, what happens. They're told what to do by

0:43:34.560 --> 0:43:37.839
<v Speaker 1>a god. A god makes them do it. Now, it's

0:43:37.880 --> 0:43:40.280
<v Speaker 1>it's generally when we look back on pieces of literature

0:43:40.280 --> 0:43:41.680
<v Speaker 1>like this, we think, well, this is just this was

0:43:41.719 --> 0:43:44.279
<v Speaker 1>a primitive form of literature, This was a this is

0:43:44.280 --> 0:43:47.480
<v Speaker 1>a more archaic um in a form of storytelling. Yeah,

0:43:47.480 --> 0:43:50.000
<v Speaker 1>you see it as a literary device, which very well

0:43:50.040 --> 0:43:52.239
<v Speaker 1>could be. It makes me think, you know, all these

0:43:52.320 --> 0:43:56.080
<v Speaker 1>various bad films that you and I enjoy, and sometimes

0:43:56.480 --> 0:44:01.400
<v Speaker 1>they're enjoyably bad because the craftsmanship isn't there at various levels.

0:44:01.880 --> 0:44:06.240
<v Speaker 1>Um if bicameral, if the bicameral mind hypothesis is true,

0:44:06.560 --> 0:44:09.839
<v Speaker 1>could it be possible that that sometimes we love bad

0:44:09.880 --> 0:44:13.439
<v Speaker 1>movies because they seem to have been created by a bicameral. Mind.

0:44:14.920 --> 0:44:17.360
<v Speaker 1>I was with you every step of the way there, Robert.

0:44:17.719 --> 0:44:21.200
<v Speaker 1>I can believe that there are movies that feel quite bicameral. Yeah,

0:44:21.360 --> 0:44:24.360
<v Speaker 1>that feel as if they were like dictated by a

0:44:24.400 --> 0:44:28.279
<v Speaker 1>divine presence rather than consciously thought through. All right, but

0:44:28.280 --> 0:44:29.960
<v Speaker 1>but but back to the discussion here. So, yeah, we

0:44:30.000 --> 0:44:33.200
<v Speaker 1>have this this war going on. There's no introspection, there's

0:44:33.239 --> 0:44:36.960
<v Speaker 1>nothing that resembles consciousness, and at all the pivotal plot

0:44:37.000 --> 0:44:39.600
<v Speaker 1>points are punctuated by a God stepping in and saying

0:44:39.680 --> 0:44:41.359
<v Speaker 1>do this or do that. Yeah. So there might be

0:44:41.440 --> 0:44:43.520
<v Speaker 1>like a scene where Achilles is going to reach out

0:44:43.560 --> 0:44:46.440
<v Speaker 1>and kill his king Agamemnon, but instead it says, a

0:44:46.520 --> 0:44:52.080
<v Speaker 1>God grabs him and tell and makes him not do it. Yeah. Interesting.

0:44:52.560 --> 0:44:54.719
<v Speaker 1>I would like to see more of that in our films, though,

0:44:54.719 --> 0:44:56.960
<v Speaker 1>where you just have God's pop up and direct the

0:44:57.000 --> 0:45:00.080
<v Speaker 1>course of action. You know, even in the words of

0:45:00.120 --> 0:45:03.360
<v Speaker 1>the Greek, Jane says, uh, we can see something of

0:45:03.680 --> 0:45:07.560
<v Speaker 1>bicamerality here because there are Greek words that later come

0:45:07.640 --> 0:45:11.000
<v Speaker 1>to be used to refer to consciousness, and they appear

0:45:11.160 --> 0:45:14.520
<v Speaker 1>throughout the Iliad, but through contextual clues we can tell

0:45:14.600 --> 0:45:17.600
<v Speaker 1>that they mean something entirely different in the Iliad than

0:45:17.640 --> 0:45:20.520
<v Speaker 1>what they mean when they later come to mean consciousness.

0:45:20.960 --> 0:45:25.239
<v Speaker 1>For example, the word see he it's spelt psyche, you know,

0:45:25.360 --> 0:45:29.080
<v Speaker 1>in the English pronunciation see he. In later centuries, this

0:45:29.160 --> 0:45:32.640
<v Speaker 1>clearly comes to mean consciousness or mind or soul. That's

0:45:32.640 --> 0:45:35.200
<v Speaker 1>how it is used in Greek, but in the Iliad

0:45:35.719 --> 0:45:38.960
<v Speaker 1>phase it appears to refer to something more like physical

0:45:39.160 --> 0:45:43.040
<v Speaker 1>life substances. Jane says it means something more like blood

0:45:43.200 --> 0:45:46.520
<v Speaker 1>or breath, like if a soldier gets killed on the battlefield,

0:45:46.920 --> 0:45:50.960
<v Speaker 1>his see he bleeds out onto the ground, or the

0:45:51.000 --> 0:45:54.800
<v Speaker 1>word thumos. In later writings, Jane says this means something

0:45:54.840 --> 0:45:58.239
<v Speaker 1>more like emotional mind or soul. In the Iliad, once again,

0:45:58.239 --> 0:46:01.040
<v Speaker 1>it seems to have this base level animal meaning. It's

0:46:01.080 --> 0:46:05.080
<v Speaker 1>something more like animation or motion. So when a soldier

0:46:05.200 --> 0:46:10.160
<v Speaker 1>stops moving, the thumos goes out of his limbs, But

0:46:10.360 --> 0:46:12.880
<v Speaker 1>it also seems to mean this weird kind of organ

0:46:12.960 --> 0:46:15.680
<v Speaker 1>in the body that can be filled with the impetus

0:46:15.719 --> 0:46:22.040
<v Speaker 1>for motion or activity. Next is noose. In later Greek,

0:46:22.080 --> 0:46:25.400
<v Speaker 1>it certainly comes to mean consciousness, it's like a conscious mind,

0:46:25.880 --> 0:46:28.720
<v Speaker 1>but in the Iliad it appears to mean something much plainer.

0:46:28.760 --> 0:46:32.000
<v Speaker 1>It means like sight or field of vision. So when

0:46:32.040 --> 0:46:36.120
<v Speaker 1>you see something, the thing is in your noose. Now,

0:46:36.400 --> 0:46:38.960
<v Speaker 1>this next point, this is the exact place where he

0:46:39.000 --> 0:46:42.000
<v Speaker 1>really gave me the creeps, and I got actual chill bumps.

0:46:42.040 --> 0:46:44.680
<v Speaker 1>He points out that the Iliad, as well as a

0:46:44.800 --> 0:46:47.719
<v Speaker 1>Greek art of the time quote, shows man as an

0:46:47.760 --> 0:46:52.600
<v Speaker 1>assembly of strangely articulated limbs, the joints under drawn and

0:46:52.640 --> 0:46:56.480
<v Speaker 1>the torso almost separated from the hips. It is graphically

0:46:56.560 --> 0:46:59.120
<v Speaker 1>what we find again and again in Homer, who speaks

0:46:59.120 --> 0:47:03.360
<v Speaker 1>of hands, lower arms, upper arms, feet, calves, and thighs

0:47:03.840 --> 0:47:07.960
<v Speaker 1>as being fleet, sinewy in speedy motion, etcetera, with no

0:47:08.160 --> 0:47:11.560
<v Speaker 1>mention of the body as a whole. Yeah. So it's

0:47:11.560 --> 0:47:17.799
<v Speaker 1>just this idea of of just these automatons waging war, uh,

0:47:17.840 --> 0:47:22.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, killing each other with without this concrete sense

0:47:22.320 --> 0:47:25.600
<v Speaker 1>of self guiding. It so alien to comprehend. Oh, it

0:47:25.640 --> 0:47:28.560
<v Speaker 1>really is. And so if you buy into Jane's theory,

0:47:29.320 --> 0:47:31.120
<v Speaker 1>or if you just want to entertain it as we

0:47:31.160 --> 0:47:34.719
<v Speaker 1>are doing, these characters simply do not seem to introspect.

0:47:34.880 --> 0:47:38.560
<v Speaker 1>They argue, they rage, they desire, they act out on desires,

0:47:38.840 --> 0:47:41.040
<v Speaker 1>but they don't seem to have access to a mind

0:47:41.120 --> 0:47:45.120
<v Speaker 1>space where they can perform introspective, metaphor based activities like

0:47:45.160 --> 0:47:48.760
<v Speaker 1>we described in the previous episode, they don't have access

0:47:48.800 --> 0:47:52.319
<v Speaker 1>either to the conscious aspect of decision making. Instead, when

0:47:52.320 --> 0:47:54.320
<v Speaker 1>they got to make a novel decision, the iliot is

0:47:54.440 --> 0:47:56.880
<v Speaker 1>very clear about what happens. The God tells them what

0:47:56.960 --> 0:48:01.000
<v Speaker 1>to do and they do it. Hm. Maybe this is

0:48:01.000 --> 0:48:03.600
<v Speaker 1>one of the reasons we like like a very classic

0:48:03.680 --> 0:48:06.000
<v Speaker 1>action hero, you know, because it's like they don't think,

0:48:06.040 --> 0:48:08.319
<v Speaker 1>they just do. They are a man of action. They

0:48:08.320 --> 0:48:13.279
<v Speaker 1>are a bicameral hero. I mean, you sometimes do get

0:48:13.320 --> 0:48:17.000
<v Speaker 1>that sense, right that there is a kind of there's

0:48:17.040 --> 0:48:21.200
<v Speaker 1>a kind of unthinking charisma to the action hero in

0:48:21.280 --> 0:48:24.520
<v Speaker 1>most action movies. Uh. I guess that is what you'd

0:48:24.520 --> 0:48:28.840
<v Speaker 1>call that, that man of action cliche. I mean, I

0:48:28.880 --> 0:48:31.600
<v Speaker 1>guess it. Technically usually is a man in these movies,

0:48:31.640 --> 0:48:34.640
<v Speaker 1>and he's got this kind of macho swagger that does

0:48:34.719 --> 0:48:38.640
<v Speaker 1>not seem to involve thinking, It doesn't seem to involve

0:48:38.680 --> 0:48:43.160
<v Speaker 1>self reflection. They've just got this. Uh, this like violent intuition,

0:48:43.480 --> 0:48:46.239
<v Speaker 1>can't be bargained with, can't be reasoned with, and absolutely

0:48:46.239 --> 0:48:49.040
<v Speaker 1>will not stop. I mean this that's the terminator. Uh.

0:48:49.400 --> 0:48:51.719
<v Speaker 1>In a nutshell, the by the terminator is is a

0:48:51.960 --> 0:48:55.240
<v Speaker 1>is a machine. Everybody was the terminator in the Iliad.

0:48:55.320 --> 0:48:58.440
<v Speaker 1>That's the scary part. Oh man, So what I what

0:48:58.520 --> 0:49:01.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm thirsting for now? It's almost like this theory is

0:49:01.960 --> 0:49:04.960
<v Speaker 1>too interesting and I'm too tempted to want it to

0:49:05.000 --> 0:49:07.960
<v Speaker 1>be true. So what I want now is for a

0:49:08.040 --> 0:49:10.520
<v Speaker 1>great classic scholar to say, like, no, no, no, he's

0:49:10.560 --> 0:49:13.000
<v Speaker 1>got it all wrong. Here's why, here's how. You can

0:49:13.040 --> 0:49:15.840
<v Speaker 1>definitely find lots of signs of consciousness in the Iliad.

0:49:16.000 --> 0:49:17.920
<v Speaker 1>And they're not later editions. They are part of the

0:49:17.920 --> 0:49:22.319
<v Speaker 1>original text. I want that, or I don't want that.

0:49:22.360 --> 0:49:24.680
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I need that. Yeah, Otherwise I feel

0:49:24.719 --> 0:49:27.520
<v Speaker 1>like I'm just buying into the idea that Stanley Kubrick

0:49:27.560 --> 0:49:30.759
<v Speaker 1>faith them in landing or something. Right. Yeah, it is

0:49:30.800 --> 0:49:34.080
<v Speaker 1>just such a radical hypothesis. Okay, Well, let's leave the

0:49:34.120 --> 0:49:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Iliad and look at some other literature from the ancient world.

0:49:37.440 --> 0:49:41.040
<v Speaker 1>How about Jewish literature. This is interesting. I'd not run

0:49:41.080 --> 0:49:43.680
<v Speaker 1>across this before either. This is a so this deals

0:49:43.719 --> 0:49:47.279
<v Speaker 1>with him. Yeah. The Elohim, one of the names of

0:49:47.320 --> 0:49:50.840
<v Speaker 1>God used in the in the Hebrew Bible, very often

0:49:50.880 --> 0:49:54.680
<v Speaker 1>just translated as God as singular, right, right, But he

0:49:54.800 --> 0:49:57.000
<v Speaker 1>argues that to translate it as merely God is to

0:49:57.040 --> 0:50:00.839
<v Speaker 1>miss the plural nature of the word in Hebrew Uh,

0:50:01.040 --> 0:50:03.960
<v Speaker 1>which is something I've independently read, like eloheim is essentially

0:50:04.000 --> 0:50:06.960
<v Speaker 1>a plural word, but it's rendered in the modern sense

0:50:07.000 --> 0:50:09.400
<v Speaker 1>and as a singular word. Yeah. It says that it

0:50:09.480 --> 0:50:13.000
<v Speaker 1>comes from the root of to be powerful. But better

0:50:13.040 --> 0:50:18.240
<v Speaker 1>translations of Him might be the great ones, the prominent ones,

0:50:18.800 --> 0:50:23.680
<v Speaker 1>the Majesty's, the judges, the mighty ones, etcetera. And so these,

0:50:24.120 --> 0:50:26.560
<v Speaker 1>he argues, are the vote could be the voice visions

0:50:26.600 --> 0:50:30.520
<v Speaker 1>of the bicameral mind. And he also argues that one

0:50:30.560 --> 0:50:33.360
<v Speaker 1>can really see the decline of the bicameral vision in

0:50:33.400 --> 0:50:35.640
<v Speaker 1>the Bible. And now this is I really love this,

0:50:35.680 --> 0:50:37.560
<v Speaker 1>because he's basically talking about all right, if you pick

0:50:37.640 --> 0:50:40.080
<v Speaker 1>up the Old Testament and you read it front to back,

0:50:40.440 --> 0:50:44.280
<v Speaker 1>you can see this transition. So in the he says, quote,

0:50:44.280 --> 0:50:47.120
<v Speaker 1>in the true bicameral period, there was usually a visual

0:50:47.160 --> 0:50:51.480
<v Speaker 1>component to the halluciated hallucinated voice, either it's self hallucinated

0:50:51.640 --> 0:50:54.320
<v Speaker 1>or as the statue in front of which and in

0:50:54.360 --> 0:50:57.720
<v Speaker 1>front of which one listened so even as a modern

0:50:57.800 --> 0:50:59.839
<v Speaker 1>reader of the Bible will find this. You go from

0:50:59.880 --> 0:51:03.120
<v Speaker 1>a physical God who physically does stuff like kick people

0:51:03.120 --> 0:51:06.239
<v Speaker 1>out of the garden or shut the door on the arc,

0:51:06.680 --> 0:51:09.759
<v Speaker 1>to a God that merely speaks to everyone, and a

0:51:09.840 --> 0:51:14.160
<v Speaker 1>purely auditory God that we account that we encounter with Moses,

0:51:14.480 --> 0:51:17.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, with additional visual flares here and there, and

0:51:17.640 --> 0:51:21.479
<v Speaker 1>crucially after that, a God of law and religion rather

0:51:21.560 --> 0:51:24.800
<v Speaker 1>than of direct experience. So you go from this robustly

0:51:24.960 --> 0:51:28.560
<v Speaker 1>imagined God who physically does stuff to a God who

0:51:28.640 --> 0:51:32.000
<v Speaker 1>is a voice, to a God who is not experienced

0:51:32.040 --> 0:51:36.120
<v Speaker 1>directly and rather as experience through his tradition of teachings

0:51:36.160 --> 0:51:40.200
<v Speaker 1>and law and so um so yeah. James argues that

0:51:40.239 --> 0:51:42.920
<v Speaker 1>the Hebrew Bible is essentially a long narrative of the

0:51:42.960 --> 0:51:47.920
<v Speaker 1>transition from myth to bicameral humankind, too conscious humankind, and

0:51:48.000 --> 0:51:50.040
<v Speaker 1>you can see the whole thing there. You've got the

0:51:50.040 --> 0:51:53.719
<v Speaker 1>older prophets like Amos, who Jans identifies as clearly bicameral,

0:51:54.040 --> 0:51:58.359
<v Speaker 1>to Ecclesiastes, who uh. James thinks the author shows all

0:51:58.400 --> 0:52:01.399
<v Speaker 1>the markers of consciousness, and he claims you can also

0:52:01.440 --> 0:52:05.840
<v Speaker 1>see this painful transition from bicameral society to conscious society

0:52:05.880 --> 0:52:09.040
<v Speaker 1>in many aspects of the canon. A couple of examples,

0:52:09.920 --> 0:52:13.160
<v Speaker 1>he says people are constantly begging for contact with a

0:52:13.239 --> 0:52:16.600
<v Speaker 1>god or gods that no longer speak to them in

0:52:16.640 --> 0:52:19.720
<v Speaker 1>the literature that he believes comes from the conscious period

0:52:19.800 --> 0:52:22.680
<v Speaker 1>of this history. So one quote he gives from Psalm

0:52:22.760 --> 0:52:25.239
<v Speaker 1>forty two, and this is with the name of God

0:52:25.280 --> 0:52:28.040
<v Speaker 1>rendered directly to the plural rather than the singular, as

0:52:28.040 --> 0:52:31.720
<v Speaker 1>it would usually be rendered as the stag pants after

0:52:31.800 --> 0:52:35.320
<v Speaker 1>the water brooks. So pants my mind after you, Oh Gods,

0:52:35.760 --> 0:52:39.479
<v Speaker 1>my mind thirsts for God's, for living gods. When shall

0:52:39.560 --> 0:52:42.920
<v Speaker 1>I come face to face with God's. Yeah, it's almost

0:52:42.960 --> 0:52:45.719
<v Speaker 1>like a like a gradual breakup story, like what he

0:52:45.760 --> 0:52:47.240
<v Speaker 1>used to He used to see God all the time.

0:52:47.320 --> 0:52:49.640
<v Speaker 1>We hung out, and now, yeah, we talk on the

0:52:49.680 --> 0:52:51.680
<v Speaker 1>phone sometime, but it's not quite the same. And now

0:52:51.760 --> 0:52:55.320
<v Speaker 1>it's like he won't even call. We just keep exchanging texts,

0:52:55.400 --> 0:52:57.520
<v Speaker 1>and suddenly, you know, that's all I have to go on.

0:52:57.680 --> 0:53:00.640
<v Speaker 1>It's just the not even new texts, but the old texts.

0:53:00.680 --> 0:53:04.360
<v Speaker 1>But then again, there are there are definitely in Jane's vision,

0:53:04.480 --> 0:53:07.799
<v Speaker 1>partisans of the conscious version of the religion that don't

0:53:07.880 --> 0:53:11.520
<v Speaker 1>want anything to do with the direct experience version of

0:53:11.560 --> 0:53:14.560
<v Speaker 1>the religion. Like he says that there are many signs

0:53:14.560 --> 0:53:16.839
<v Speaker 1>throughout the books of the Hebrew Bible that the Bicameral

0:53:16.880 --> 0:53:20.600
<v Speaker 1>people may have been actively persecuted by conscious people for

0:53:20.719 --> 0:53:24.320
<v Speaker 1>religious reasons. I'll just read one quote, he says. Quote.

0:53:24.440 --> 0:53:27.680
<v Speaker 1>A further vestige from the Bicameral era is the word obe,

0:53:27.920 --> 0:53:32.400
<v Speaker 1>often translated as a familiar spirit. A man also or

0:53:32.440 --> 0:53:35.120
<v Speaker 1>a woman that have an obe shall surely be put

0:53:35.200 --> 0:53:40.359
<v Speaker 1>to death, says Leviticus. And similarly, Saul drives out from

0:53:40.440 --> 0:53:43.720
<v Speaker 1>Israel all those that had an obe in First Samuel.

0:53:44.360 --> 0:53:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Even though an obe is something that one consults with,

0:53:47.760 --> 0:53:52.200
<v Speaker 1>according to Deuteronomy eighteen eleven, it probably had no physical embodiment.

0:53:52.480 --> 0:53:55.759
<v Speaker 1>It is always bracketed with wizards and witches, and thus

0:53:55.800 --> 0:53:59.799
<v Speaker 1>probably refers to some Bicameral voice that was not recognized

0:53:59.840 --> 0:54:04.040
<v Speaker 1>by the Old Testament writers as religious. Yeah. I mean,

0:54:04.040 --> 0:54:06.560
<v Speaker 1>you get into this scenario where you know, obviously the

0:54:06.600 --> 0:54:08.880
<v Speaker 1>individuals who don't hear the voices, they've built up all

0:54:08.960 --> 0:54:11.560
<v Speaker 1>this this law and order based on the old texts

0:54:12.040 --> 0:54:16.160
<v Speaker 1>in the old stories. It becomes dangerous if other individuals

0:54:16.200 --> 0:54:19.520
<v Speaker 1>are attempting to to add new material to it. No,

0:54:19.680 --> 0:54:22.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm hearing God's right now, and they're telling me something different. Yeah,

0:54:22.840 --> 0:54:25.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean it reminds me of the fact that the

0:54:25.280 --> 0:54:27.600
<v Speaker 1>church that I attend they have this saying God is

0:54:27.640 --> 0:54:31.600
<v Speaker 1>still speaking, which, as it's intended, the idea is God

0:54:31.719 --> 0:54:34.600
<v Speaker 1>is still real and a part of everyone's lives, and

0:54:34.680 --> 0:54:36.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is not just a story. But on

0:54:36.680 --> 0:54:39.560
<v Speaker 1>the other hand, there's it's kind of scary to think, well,

0:54:39.560 --> 0:54:41.520
<v Speaker 1>if God is still speaking, what's he going to say?

0:54:42.080 --> 0:54:46.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, Um, the conflict comes. It could provide license

0:54:46.400 --> 0:54:49.719
<v Speaker 1>for some very uh, for some very disturbing content, yea,

0:54:50.360 --> 0:54:53.160
<v Speaker 1>or some great stuff. Yeah indeed. Yeah, it's just sort

0:54:53.160 --> 0:54:56.720
<v Speaker 1>of like it provides you with a blanket authorization for

0:54:56.840 --> 0:54:59.920
<v Speaker 1>action that is not so there if you have a

0:55:00.000 --> 0:55:02.600
<v Speaker 1>written and codified law. So again, all of this just

0:55:02.719 --> 0:55:05.880
<v Speaker 1>ends up playing into the conflict of the downfall of

0:55:05.920 --> 0:55:09.840
<v Speaker 1>the bicameral mind. As the voices blink out and this

0:55:10.040 --> 0:55:13.560
<v Speaker 1>a new system of of order and social stability has

0:55:13.600 --> 0:55:16.720
<v Speaker 1>to take hold. So let's try to summarize real quick

0:55:16.960 --> 0:55:20.320
<v Speaker 1>what James is saying is the basic contours of the

0:55:20.600 --> 0:55:25.040
<v Speaker 1>transition through the bicameral period to the conscious period. Let's

0:55:25.040 --> 0:55:26.879
<v Speaker 1>see Robert tell me what you think of this. As

0:55:26.880 --> 0:55:29.720
<v Speaker 1>I've tried to summarize his view, I think James argues

0:55:29.760 --> 0:55:34.280
<v Speaker 1>that bicameral society emerged with language and the increasing size

0:55:34.360 --> 0:55:38.480
<v Speaker 1>of tribal groups. So when one could encode mental content

0:55:38.600 --> 0:55:42.440
<v Speaker 1>into grammatical sentences, it was possible to code action motivation

0:55:42.520 --> 0:55:45.879
<v Speaker 1>efficiently through language. So you have a big group where

0:55:45.880 --> 0:55:49.799
<v Speaker 1>your authority figure can't be around to constantly tell you

0:55:49.840 --> 0:55:52.400
<v Speaker 1>what to do because the group's too big. So a

0:55:52.520 --> 0:55:56.360
<v Speaker 1>command heard from one's parents or one's tribal chieftain is

0:55:56.440 --> 0:56:01.520
<v Speaker 1>hallucinated to recur over and over again provide continuous motivation

0:56:01.600 --> 0:56:05.520
<v Speaker 1>for action. And this is the non dominant hemisphere commanding

0:56:05.520 --> 0:56:09.160
<v Speaker 1>the dominant hemisphere. This is the first version of bi camerality.

0:56:09.360 --> 0:56:12.560
<v Speaker 1>So when you've got words and sentences that can be hallucinated,

0:56:13.360 --> 0:56:18.239
<v Speaker 1>then over time these admonitory voices, eventually they become not

0:56:18.320 --> 0:56:22.000
<v Speaker 1>just repetitive but synthetic. So they're not just telling you

0:56:22.080 --> 0:56:24.560
<v Speaker 1>what these authority figures have told you in the past,

0:56:24.960 --> 0:56:28.760
<v Speaker 1>but they're telling you what these authority figures would command

0:56:29.280 --> 0:56:31.880
<v Speaker 1>if they were present now. And of course we know,

0:56:32.000 --> 0:56:35.680
<v Speaker 1>the mind has the power to synthesize information and imagine

0:56:35.680 --> 0:56:38.720
<v Speaker 1>what somebody else would command. We do that consciously now,

0:56:38.760 --> 0:56:41.440
<v Speaker 1>But here it's saying, what if the right hemisphere and

0:56:41.719 --> 0:56:45.759
<v Speaker 1>in most people, or the non dominant hemisphere generally did

0:56:45.800 --> 0:56:52.040
<v Speaker 1>that automatically, nonconsciously. Uh So, over time, parents and chieftains

0:56:52.120 --> 0:56:55.960
<v Speaker 1>die and their voices are still heard instead of internal

0:56:56.000 --> 0:57:01.160
<v Speaker 1>copies of authority figures, they become imbued with disim bodied authority.

0:57:01.200 --> 0:57:06.640
<v Speaker 1>The voice itself provides inherent authorization, magical authority, as from

0:57:06.680 --> 0:57:10.680
<v Speaker 1>a God. Then for a long time, bicameral society grows

0:57:10.680 --> 0:57:14.520
<v Speaker 1>and develops, and bicameral people build technologies and kingdoms and

0:57:14.600 --> 0:57:17.880
<v Speaker 1>begin to write works of ancient literature. But what happens

0:57:17.920 --> 0:57:21.800
<v Speaker 1>to make it all disappear? Essentially, his answer is a

0:57:21.840 --> 0:57:27.880
<v Speaker 1>combination of catastrophe and literature. Would you agree with that, Robert, Yeah,

0:57:27.920 --> 0:57:31.840
<v Speaker 1>that seems to be the basic idea catastrophe and literature. Yeah,

0:57:32.080 --> 0:57:34.640
<v Speaker 1>the story of the story of our lives. Yeah, that

0:57:34.640 --> 0:57:37.280
<v Speaker 1>that that is the roof collapsing on the bicameral mind.

0:57:37.400 --> 0:57:41.040
<v Speaker 1>So the catastrophe he singles out is the widespread failure

0:57:41.120 --> 0:57:44.760
<v Speaker 1>of civilization throughout the Eastern Mediterranean close to the end

0:57:44.760 --> 0:57:48.439
<v Speaker 1>of the second millennium BC. This is a period that's

0:57:48.480 --> 0:57:50.680
<v Speaker 1>coming off of what's now referred to as the Late

0:57:50.760 --> 0:57:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Bronze Age collapse, where ancient empires fell apart and dispersed

0:57:54.960 --> 0:57:57.080
<v Speaker 1>and people were displaced, and there was a lot of

0:57:57.120 --> 0:58:02.720
<v Speaker 1>war and raiding and collapse of infrastructure. Trade was interrupted,

0:58:02.840 --> 0:58:05.840
<v Speaker 1>education stifled, and it led to what some would consider

0:58:05.920 --> 0:58:08.720
<v Speaker 1>a dark Age of the ancient world. And he also

0:58:08.840 --> 0:58:12.080
<v Speaker 1>argues that a certain a small amount of natural selection

0:58:12.120 --> 0:58:14.400
<v Speaker 1>may have come into play as well, because as all

0:58:14.480 --> 0:58:17.880
<v Speaker 1>this is going on, in the enormous, enormous bloodshed that's

0:58:17.880 --> 0:58:20.360
<v Speaker 1>playing out here at the end of the second century BC,

0:58:21.160 --> 0:58:23.560
<v Speaker 1>those who had the best chance to survive were those

0:58:23.600 --> 0:58:26.760
<v Speaker 1>who could resist the commandments of the gods and the

0:58:27.240 --> 0:58:29.760
<v Speaker 1>literal you know, the voice of compulsion, right, who were

0:58:29.800 --> 0:58:34.000
<v Speaker 1>more adaptable and could narrotize out solutions to problems, and

0:58:34.080 --> 0:58:38.240
<v Speaker 1>who had the ability to practice prolonged deception and treachery. Yes,

0:58:38.320 --> 0:58:41.080
<v Speaker 1>that's another huge idea here. So yeah, So he's got

0:58:41.080 --> 0:58:44.160
<v Speaker 1>a summary of of the several factors he thinks led

0:58:44.240 --> 0:58:47.760
<v Speaker 1>to in this period around the Eastern Mediterranean and Mesopotamia.

0:58:47.880 --> 0:58:51.280
<v Speaker 1>The collapse of the bicameral mind and the beginnings of

0:58:51.320 --> 0:58:54.919
<v Speaker 1>widespread consciousness in culture. So what are these main things

0:58:54.960 --> 0:58:58.560
<v Speaker 1>he offers? He's talking about, first of all, one, the

0:58:58.600 --> 0:59:02.560
<v Speaker 1>weakening of the auditory by the advent of writing. Okay,

0:59:02.600 --> 0:59:04.960
<v Speaker 1>A good example would be the invention of written law,

0:59:05.120 --> 0:59:08.440
<v Speaker 1>right clearly distinguishing acceptable from non acceptable behavior in a

0:59:08.480 --> 0:59:12.040
<v Speaker 1>way that does not require the intervention of an internal God. Yeah,

0:59:12.080 --> 0:59:13.959
<v Speaker 1>we've got these tablets here. He didn't have to speak

0:59:13.960 --> 0:59:16.080
<v Speaker 1>to you all the time. Just refer to the tablets. Yeah,

0:59:16.280 --> 0:59:18.480
<v Speaker 1>this is how I feel about any kind of power

0:59:18.520 --> 0:59:21.400
<v Speaker 1>point presentation. Just give me the power point. I don't

0:59:21.440 --> 0:59:23.400
<v Speaker 1>need the voice of God telling me the things. Just

0:59:23.440 --> 0:59:26.600
<v Speaker 1>give me a list. Yeah, okay, okay, what's the next thing?

0:59:26.840 --> 0:59:30.720
<v Speaker 1>Number two? The inherent fragility of hallucinatory control. Okay, Yeah,

0:59:30.800 --> 0:59:33.520
<v Speaker 1>we can see that there's some instability in the system there.

0:59:33.880 --> 0:59:37.440
<v Speaker 1>Number three, the unworkable nous of God's in the chaos

0:59:37.480 --> 0:59:41.280
<v Speaker 1>of historical upheaval. Okay, So the God's prevented problem that

0:59:41.400 --> 0:59:45.520
<v Speaker 1>they caused problems when when society and hierarchy was falling apart. Yeah,

0:59:45.560 --> 0:59:48.120
<v Speaker 1>and again, the voice of the gods was just there

0:59:48.160 --> 0:59:50.760
<v Speaker 1>was not actually the voice of a divine being with

0:59:50.840 --> 0:59:56.320
<v Speaker 1>superior knowledge. It was still originating from within the individual, right, Okay.

0:59:56.320 --> 0:59:58.440
<v Speaker 1>The fourth one, the fourth one is the depositing of

0:59:58.480 --> 1:00:02.320
<v Speaker 1>internal cause and the observation of difference in others. Okay,

1:00:02.360 --> 1:00:05.280
<v Speaker 1>So you see other people are behaving differently, and you

1:00:05.320 --> 1:00:09.160
<v Speaker 1>begin to wonder if maybe they're just behaving on their

1:00:09.200 --> 1:00:12.360
<v Speaker 1>own and not being commanded by God's maybe undermining your

1:00:12.360 --> 1:00:15.240
<v Speaker 1>own authorization of god belief. Yeah, I can see where

1:00:15.280 --> 1:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>it would be. Um, I mean it would it would

1:00:18.440 --> 1:00:21.480
<v Speaker 1>It would be contagious in that in that respect. Yeah. Uh.

1:00:21.640 --> 1:00:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Number five the acquisition of anatization from epics, the introduction

1:00:26.080 --> 1:00:30.120
<v Speaker 1>of stories. Number six the survival value of deceit, which

1:00:30.120 --> 1:00:33.120
<v Speaker 1>we already touched on, and number seven a modicum of

1:00:33.240 --> 1:00:36.200
<v Speaker 1>natural selection, which we also discussed here. But to be clear,

1:00:36.480 --> 1:00:40.320
<v Speaker 1>I think James is primarily thinking about these transitions in mindset,

1:00:40.520 --> 1:00:44.200
<v Speaker 1>not as changes in the physical brain brought about by

1:00:44.240 --> 1:00:46.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, mutation and natural selection, though there might be

1:00:47.040 --> 1:00:51.120
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of selection towards levels of predisposition for it.

1:00:51.160 --> 1:00:54.200
<v Speaker 1>But he's primarily thinking about this as cultural change. Right

1:00:54.280 --> 1:00:57.640
<v Speaker 1>that there there are cultures of bi camerality and cultures

1:00:57.680 --> 1:01:01.280
<v Speaker 1>of consciousness. Yes, all right, we're gonna take one more break,

1:01:01.280 --> 1:01:03.560
<v Speaker 1>and when we come back, we're going to jump into

1:01:03.680 --> 1:01:08.480
<v Speaker 1>modern traces of the bicameral mind. Thank you, thank alright,

1:01:08.480 --> 1:01:12.040
<v Speaker 1>we're back. So we've examined the evidence that James claims

1:01:12.040 --> 1:01:14.280
<v Speaker 1>to offer for the existence of a bicameral mind and

1:01:14.400 --> 1:01:17.640
<v Speaker 1>history and his conception of how the bicameral mind arose

1:01:18.040 --> 1:01:22.600
<v Speaker 1>and then collapsed into society's based on conscious mentality. So,

1:01:22.960 --> 1:01:26.160
<v Speaker 1>if there truly was a bicamerality in the past, if

1:01:26.160 --> 1:01:28.720
<v Speaker 1>our brains are still so wired as to be perhaps

1:01:28.800 --> 1:01:31.600
<v Speaker 1>capable of bi cameral culture in the present, if we

1:01:31.720 --> 1:01:35.760
<v Speaker 1>just practiced it, what would the evidence of that be. Well,

1:01:35.800 --> 1:01:38.840
<v Speaker 1>you would think there'll be some practices in human behavior

1:01:39.080 --> 1:01:40.880
<v Speaker 1>that would give you evidence that we used to be

1:01:40.920 --> 1:01:44.040
<v Speaker 1>b cameral and that we could still be bicameral if

1:01:44.080 --> 1:01:46.800
<v Speaker 1>we tried. That's right. And he first of all, he

1:01:46.840 --> 1:01:50.720
<v Speaker 1>makes uh, he makes some examples out of religion. So

1:01:51.440 --> 1:01:53.560
<v Speaker 1>at this point I think everyone can pretty well imagine

1:01:53.560 --> 1:01:56.480
<v Speaker 1>the sorts of religious examples that James is going to make.

1:01:56.840 --> 1:01:59.200
<v Speaker 1>After all, we've been discussing the trans like nature of

1:01:59.240 --> 1:02:04.320
<v Speaker 1>biocameral existence. Uh. In the Commanding words of corpses and statues,

1:02:04.400 --> 1:02:07.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, all you know, very magical and scenarios that

1:02:07.920 --> 1:02:10.560
<v Speaker 1>we can imagine lining up with both religious stories and

1:02:10.640 --> 1:02:15.280
<v Speaker 1>religious right. So expectantly he points to spirit possession. There's

1:02:15.320 --> 1:02:17.760
<v Speaker 1>a topic we come back to on a few different

1:02:17.960 --> 1:02:20.200
<v Speaker 1>episodes of Stuff to Blow Your Mind, and it ranges

1:02:20.200 --> 1:02:24.160
<v Speaker 1>from demonic possession across various cultures to you know, tribal

1:02:24.240 --> 1:02:28.680
<v Speaker 1>African beats that threatened Carl Young's sanity, and more positive

1:02:28.720 --> 1:02:32.480
<v Speaker 1>forms of spirit possessions such as oracles, which which Jane

1:02:32.520 --> 1:02:35.000
<v Speaker 1>spends a lot of time with. Um. We have a

1:02:35.040 --> 1:02:36.880
<v Speaker 1>recent episode of Stuff to Blow Your Mind that covers

1:02:36.960 --> 1:02:41.800
<v Speaker 1>the the Thaie tattoo festival in which uh, the animal

1:02:41.920 --> 1:02:45.240
<v Speaker 1>tattoo ends up overtaking the individual individual. So we have

1:02:45.280 --> 1:02:48.600
<v Speaker 1>examples of this this throughout different cultures. The speaking of

1:02:48.680 --> 1:02:52.640
<v Speaker 1>tongues uh and similar religious experiences may also play into this,

1:02:53.440 --> 1:02:55.440
<v Speaker 1>and of course we have examples of this in ancient

1:02:55.480 --> 1:02:58.680
<v Speaker 1>writings as well. So as early as a fourth century BC,

1:02:58.880 --> 1:03:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Socrates wrote of odd possessed men, so and clearly like

1:03:02.720 --> 1:03:06.120
<v Speaker 1>that's not the kind of thing you would uh necessarily

1:03:06.200 --> 1:03:10.000
<v Speaker 1>speak about if if you were immerged within a bicameral

1:03:10.360 --> 1:03:14.520
<v Speaker 1>uh world anyway, right, Um, Yeah, these might be more

1:03:14.760 --> 1:03:19.000
<v Speaker 1>vestiges of the bicameral culture. Right. And James points to

1:03:19.640 --> 1:03:24.600
<v Speaker 1>a number of different examples, mainly those dealing with Greek oracles, uh,

1:03:24.640 --> 1:03:27.400
<v Speaker 1>with the idea being that the oracle the individual here

1:03:27.440 --> 1:03:30.080
<v Speaker 1>would have would have ramped themselves up, but they basically

1:03:30.120 --> 1:03:33.840
<v Speaker 1>ramped up right hemisphere activity in relation to the left

1:03:34.440 --> 1:03:37.960
<v Speaker 1>as a result, as a response to complex ritual stimuli,

1:03:38.480 --> 1:03:40.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, the use of all these various and we've

1:03:40.120 --> 1:03:43.240
<v Speaker 1>talked about statues and language and and all of all

1:03:43.280 --> 1:03:48.880
<v Speaker 1>of these aspects playing into passed bicameral experiences. And therefore

1:03:48.920 --> 1:03:51.919
<v Speaker 1>the idea here is that even as we're shifting out

1:03:51.920 --> 1:03:55.640
<v Speaker 1>of the bicameral age, even as the bicameral ages behind us,

1:03:56.000 --> 1:03:58.200
<v Speaker 1>you have conscious individuals who are able to sort of

1:03:58.280 --> 1:04:03.840
<v Speaker 1>resurrect the bicameral experiences. Yes, he enter into trance like states, etcetera,

1:04:04.080 --> 1:04:06.480
<v Speaker 1>by engaging in these rituals. Yeah. And these would be

1:04:06.600 --> 1:04:10.880
<v Speaker 1>rituals where they channel the output of what Jans identifies

1:04:10.960 --> 1:04:15.280
<v Speaker 1>as in most people the right hemisphere speech associated sections

1:04:15.280 --> 1:04:18.440
<v Speaker 1>of course, right a speech usually coming from the left hemisphere,

1:04:18.640 --> 1:04:21.120
<v Speaker 1>So it would be like the voices of the gods

1:04:21.160 --> 1:04:23.560
<v Speaker 1>that spoke in the bicameral minds of the ancients, but

1:04:23.640 --> 1:04:26.520
<v Speaker 1>speaking out through the mouths of these oracles and prophets.

1:04:27.240 --> 1:04:31.240
<v Speaker 1>And you know what, those oracles and prophets, they didn't

1:04:31.280 --> 1:04:35.520
<v Speaker 1>necessarily speak in even in a commanding tone. In many

1:04:35.520 --> 1:04:39.200
<v Speaker 1>cases they may have they may have sung yes. And

1:04:39.240 --> 1:04:42.000
<v Speaker 1>so this is a really interesting section James gets into

1:04:42.040 --> 1:04:44.479
<v Speaker 1>in the in the third book of his book where

1:04:44.520 --> 1:04:49.320
<v Speaker 1>he talks about the evidence of pasted bicamerality in poetry

1:04:49.400 --> 1:04:54.000
<v Speaker 1>and music. So remember that Jane's neurological hypothesis, uh is

1:04:54.040 --> 1:04:57.160
<v Speaker 1>that the bicameral mind consisted of the non dominant hemisphere,

1:04:57.160 --> 1:04:59.800
<v Speaker 1>which is the right brain in most people, speaking directly

1:04:59.840 --> 1:05:03.200
<v Speaker 1>as an auditory hallucination to the dominant hemisphere, which is

1:05:03.240 --> 1:05:05.919
<v Speaker 1>the left brain in most people. Keep that in mind here,

1:05:06.360 --> 1:05:09.080
<v Speaker 1>that's right now. His his his thesis here is quote,

1:05:09.400 --> 1:05:13.320
<v Speaker 1>the first poets were God's poetry began with the bicameral mind.

1:05:13.640 --> 1:05:16.800
<v Speaker 1>The God's side of our ancient mentality, at least in

1:05:16.840 --> 1:05:20.400
<v Speaker 1>a certain period of history, usually or perhaps always spoke

1:05:20.440 --> 1:05:23.800
<v Speaker 1>in verse. This means that most men, at one time

1:05:24.000 --> 1:05:27.880
<v Speaker 1>throughout the day, we're hearing poetry of a sort composed

1:05:27.880 --> 1:05:32.360
<v Speaker 1>and spoken within their own minds. That's terrifying and beautiful. Yeah,

1:05:32.400 --> 1:05:33.680
<v Speaker 1>that that kind of sums up a lot of the

1:05:33.680 --> 1:05:37.480
<v Speaker 1>bicameral hypothesis in general. So evidence is scanned for this,

1:05:37.520 --> 1:05:41.080
<v Speaker 1>but he argues that quote individuals who remained by cameral

1:05:41.160 --> 1:05:44.960
<v Speaker 1>into the conscious age, that these individuals continue to express

1:05:45.000 --> 1:05:48.480
<v Speaker 1>the voice of God or God's and poetry um the

1:05:48.880 --> 1:05:52.280
<v Speaker 1>so you know, the Indian Veda dictated by the gods,

1:05:52.520 --> 1:05:57.120
<v Speaker 1>the oracle at Delphi, early Arabic poets, etcetera. And this

1:05:57.160 --> 1:06:01.160
<v Speaker 1>concerns music too, because early poetry was musical in nature.

1:06:01.440 --> 1:06:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Janes says absolutely. I mean, you could still say that

1:06:04.400 --> 1:06:07.560
<v Speaker 1>poetry is musical and nature, especially insofar as it invokes

1:06:07.600 --> 1:06:10.320
<v Speaker 1>any kind of scanning or rhythm. That's right. And speech

1:06:10.480 --> 1:06:13.840
<v Speaker 1>is a function again primarily of the left cerebral hemisphere,

1:06:14.000 --> 1:06:17.200
<v Speaker 1>but song is primarily a function of the right hemisphere.

1:06:17.880 --> 1:06:21.640
<v Speaker 1>Poetry begins as the divine speech of the bicameral mind.

1:06:21.920 --> 1:06:26.640
<v Speaker 1>That's an interesting hypothesis in itself. Now there's a he

1:06:26.720 --> 1:06:30.720
<v Speaker 1>presents a fair amount of of evidence for this, which

1:06:30.720 --> 1:06:32.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna I'm gonna roll through here. Joe jump in

1:06:33.760 --> 1:06:36.680
<v Speaker 1>as we go. Hit me man, all right. So, first

1:06:36.680 --> 1:06:39.640
<v Speaker 1>of all, many elderly patients who have suffered cerebral hemorrhages

1:06:39.760 --> 1:06:43.280
<v Speaker 1>on the left hemisphere such that they cannot speak, they

1:06:43.280 --> 1:06:47.680
<v Speaker 1>can still sing. We also have the Wada test to

1:06:47.760 --> 1:06:51.480
<v Speaker 1>determine a person's cerebral dominance. This is when sodium amatal

1:06:51.560 --> 1:06:55.080
<v Speaker 1>is injected into the carotid artery on one side, putting

1:06:55.080 --> 1:06:58.640
<v Speaker 1>the corresponding hemisphere under heavy sedation, and the other side

1:06:58.680 --> 1:07:01.760
<v Speaker 1>remains awake. So when this case case, if the left

1:07:01.800 --> 1:07:05.120
<v Speaker 1>hemisphere is sedated, the patient can't speak, but they can sing.

1:07:05.240 --> 1:07:07.840
<v Speaker 1>If the right hemisphere is sedated, the patient can't sing,

1:07:08.000 --> 1:07:11.200
<v Speaker 1>but they can speak. So like, the centers for speech

1:07:11.320 --> 1:07:16.280
<v Speaker 1>and singing are lateralized and the situation is more pronounced

1:07:16.280 --> 1:07:20.160
<v Speaker 1>in cases where there's actual physical damage to one hemisphere

1:07:20.240 --> 1:07:23.160
<v Speaker 1>or the other, or you know, it's it's completely removed. Also,

1:07:23.240 --> 1:07:26.640
<v Speaker 1>electrical stimulation of the right hemisphere in regions adjacent to

1:07:26.680 --> 1:07:30.840
<v Speaker 1>the posterior temporal lobe often produces hallucinations of singing and music.

1:07:32.080 --> 1:07:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Oh and he also he presents an experiment that you

1:07:34.880 --> 1:07:37.680
<v Speaker 1>can try. He says says that you can prove the

1:07:37.760 --> 1:07:42.000
<v Speaker 1>latter though the laterality of music yourself. Try hearing different

1:07:42.120 --> 1:07:46.080
<v Speaker 1>musics on two earphones at the same intensity. You will

1:07:46.080 --> 1:07:49.720
<v Speaker 1>perceive and remember the music on the left ear phone better.

1:07:50.000 --> 1:07:53.200
<v Speaker 1>This is because the left ear has greater neuro representation

1:07:53.320 --> 1:07:57.120
<v Speaker 1>on the right hemisphere. Now, he points out that Plato

1:07:57.240 --> 1:08:01.680
<v Speaker 1>spoke of poetry as possession. Yeah, said, poets then around

1:08:01.800 --> 1:08:05.400
<v Speaker 1>four b C. Were comparable in mentality to the oracles

1:08:05.400 --> 1:08:09.120
<v Speaker 1>of the same period and went through similar um psychological

1:08:09.160 --> 1:08:13.000
<v Speaker 1>transformation when they performed. And then there's this idea. We've

1:08:13.000 --> 1:08:15.240
<v Speaker 1>all heard talk of the muses, right right. I mean,

1:08:15.320 --> 1:08:18.719
<v Speaker 1>so ancient epics might start saying like sing muse blah

1:08:18.760 --> 1:08:25.120
<v Speaker 1>blah blah. So the authors telling their personal composition God

1:08:25.240 --> 1:08:28.840
<v Speaker 1>to start going Yeah, Now, when we talk about the muses,

1:08:28.880 --> 1:08:31.960
<v Speaker 1>where you know, we're just talking about inspiration or you know,

1:08:32.160 --> 1:08:34.240
<v Speaker 1>or attention even or just you know, the will to

1:08:34.280 --> 1:08:37.280
<v Speaker 1>get a project done. It's a literary device we think of. Yeah.

1:08:37.400 --> 1:08:40.040
<v Speaker 1>But but back back then, the argument is is that

1:08:40.120 --> 1:08:44.320
<v Speaker 1>the bicameral human would literally need to hear the voice

1:08:44.439 --> 1:08:48.080
<v Speaker 1>of the muse. Yeah, the muse was literally real, and

1:08:48.120 --> 1:08:50.000
<v Speaker 1>so it wasn't just something they imagine, it was something

1:08:50.000 --> 1:08:54.479
<v Speaker 1>they experienced though it all was in the brain. Now,

1:08:54.479 --> 1:08:56.760
<v Speaker 1>he points out that by the sixth century BC, the

1:08:56.880 --> 1:09:00.160
<v Speaker 1>poet is no longer just naturally imbued with their long

1:09:00.680 --> 1:09:02.840
<v Speaker 1>They have to learn the gift of the muse in

1:09:02.960 --> 1:09:06.240
<v Speaker 1>order to hear it. So societea that the voice is

1:09:06.240 --> 1:09:08.920
<v Speaker 1>becoming harder and harder for everyone to hear. So this

1:09:09.000 --> 1:09:11.280
<v Speaker 1>might be kind of like how the oracles of these

1:09:11.360 --> 1:09:14.280
<v Speaker 1>later periods, living in conscious societies have to go through

1:09:14.280 --> 1:09:17.600
<v Speaker 1>elaborate rituals to get into the altered state of consciousness

1:09:17.640 --> 1:09:21.320
<v Speaker 1>where they channel their non dominant hemisphere and let the

1:09:21.400 --> 1:09:24.160
<v Speaker 1>voice of God speak. That's right, And he says that

1:09:24.400 --> 1:09:27.920
<v Speaker 1>in the fifth century b C, we hear the very

1:09:27.920 --> 1:09:32.439
<v Speaker 1>first hints of poets being peculiar with poetic ecstasy. That's

1:09:32.479 --> 1:09:35.439
<v Speaker 1>that's his quote there. So I want to use that

1:09:35.479 --> 1:09:37.200
<v Speaker 1>from now on. If I'm like trying to get some

1:09:37.280 --> 1:09:39.720
<v Speaker 1>writing done and somebody interrupts me, I'm like, hang on,

1:09:39.800 --> 1:09:43.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm being peculiar. Yeah, So it basically just gets harder

1:09:43.280 --> 1:09:45.320
<v Speaker 1>and harder to hear the voices of the gods until

1:09:45.360 --> 1:09:48.600
<v Speaker 1>you're having to essentially make up the words yourself. It

1:09:49.080 --> 1:09:51.519
<v Speaker 1>reminds me a lot of of how magic works in

1:09:51.720 --> 1:09:55.479
<v Speaker 1>dungeons and dragons, because dungeons and Dragons you basically have

1:09:55.520 --> 1:09:58.520
<v Speaker 1>three different types of magic users. You have the warlock

1:09:58.800 --> 1:10:01.880
<v Speaker 1>who works their magic the enslavement to a god or

1:10:01.880 --> 1:10:04.679
<v Speaker 1>god like being, So that's a bicamera being. Yeah, yeah,

1:10:04.680 --> 1:10:08.720
<v Speaker 1>that would be the bicameral experience. A sorcerer learns to

1:10:08.880 --> 1:10:13.200
<v Speaker 1>better channel magic that naturally emerges from their being. So

1:10:13.360 --> 1:10:16.479
<v Speaker 1>this is like a transitional being. This is like one

1:10:16.479 --> 1:10:19.120
<v Speaker 1>of the oracles in the late antiquity. Yeah, like it

1:10:19.240 --> 1:10:21.599
<v Speaker 1>still flows through them, it still can flow through them,

1:10:21.720 --> 1:10:24.559
<v Speaker 1>but they have to manage it. And then finally you

1:10:24.600 --> 1:10:27.360
<v Speaker 1>have the arcane wizard, who has to master the workings

1:10:27.360 --> 1:10:30.840
<v Speaker 1>of magic through study and academic effort alone. So these

1:10:30.880 --> 1:10:34.040
<v Speaker 1>are the pathetic poets of the modern era who have

1:10:34.120 --> 1:10:38.360
<v Speaker 1>to consciously compose their works exactly. Yeah, and uh, you know,

1:10:38.640 --> 1:10:41.360
<v Speaker 1>in the same way that within Dungeons and Dragons you

1:10:41.400 --> 1:10:43.320
<v Speaker 1>can you can have that, you can have sort of

1:10:43.360 --> 1:10:45.920
<v Speaker 1>the attitudes of what the wizard is. And this is

1:10:45.960 --> 1:10:49.640
<v Speaker 1>also kind of based on attitudes involving witches and wizards

1:10:49.720 --> 1:10:53.080
<v Speaker 1>and in the real world in earlier periods. But there's

1:10:53.080 --> 1:10:56.519
<v Speaker 1>the idea that the arcane wizard is a master of

1:10:56.520 --> 1:11:01.000
<v Speaker 1>of these forces where lesser models are um you know,

1:11:01.040 --> 1:11:03.840
<v Speaker 1>the magic is a master of them, which is, you

1:11:03.880 --> 1:11:06.920
<v Speaker 1>know not unlike the comparison between the bicamera and the

1:11:06.920 --> 1:11:10.719
<v Speaker 1>conscious human right. And of course the idea is as uh,

1:11:10.920 --> 1:11:14.800
<v Speaker 1>conscious society exists for longer and longer, and the bicameral

1:11:14.880 --> 1:11:18.080
<v Speaker 1>society goes farther and farther into the past. Our ability

1:11:18.120 --> 1:11:20.639
<v Speaker 1>to access these states of consciousness, to be an oracle,

1:11:20.760 --> 1:11:23.559
<v Speaker 1>or to be a muse possessed poet gets further and

1:11:23.600 --> 1:11:27.640
<v Speaker 1>further from our grasp. Exactly he writes, And then the

1:11:27.760 --> 1:11:31.559
<v Speaker 1>muses hush and freeze into myths, nymphs, and shepherds dance

1:11:31.640 --> 1:11:35.280
<v Speaker 1>no more. Consciousness is a witch beneath whose charms pure

1:11:35.320 --> 1:11:39.920
<v Speaker 1>inspiration gasps and dies into invention. The oral becomes written

1:11:39.960 --> 1:11:42.360
<v Speaker 1>by the poet himself, and written it should be added

1:11:42.600 --> 1:11:45.800
<v Speaker 1>by his right hand, worked by his left hemisphere. The

1:11:45.920 --> 1:11:49.519
<v Speaker 1>muses have become imaginary and invoked in their silence as

1:11:49.560 --> 1:11:53.479
<v Speaker 1>a part of man's nostalgia for the bicameral mind. That

1:11:53.640 --> 1:11:56.800
<v Speaker 1>is gorgeous. Yeah, and the whole book is filled with

1:11:56.840 --> 1:11:59.720
<v Speaker 1>passages like that that are just beautifully written and uh

1:11:59.800 --> 1:12:03.880
<v Speaker 1>in and just really drive home often emotionally the subject matter.

1:12:04.000 --> 1:12:06.200
<v Speaker 1>That's another reason I guess I got to be skeptical

1:12:06.240 --> 1:12:10.240
<v Speaker 1>and suspicious of this hypothesis is that it's so well written.

1:12:10.320 --> 1:12:13.080
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I need to be especially cautious about it.

1:12:13.160 --> 1:12:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Like he he communicates it so well and it's so

1:12:15.840 --> 1:12:18.960
<v Speaker 1>beautiful in the book that that it's like getting an

1:12:19.000 --> 1:12:23.120
<v Speaker 1>unfair advantage as a scientific hypothesis. Yeah, yeah, I can

1:12:23.120 --> 1:12:26.799
<v Speaker 1>definitely get that argument. Maybe that's why most scientific papers

1:12:26.840 --> 1:12:29.679
<v Speaker 1>are so horrible to read, Like why you know, it's

1:12:29.720 --> 1:12:31.800
<v Speaker 1>really rare you come across the one that's really well

1:12:31.960 --> 1:12:35.479
<v Speaker 1>well written, and it's because, well, maybe maybe you shouldn't

1:12:35.560 --> 1:12:38.559
<v Speaker 1>let your writing skills make it stand out more than

1:12:38.600 --> 1:12:43.479
<v Speaker 1>the theory itself deserves in terms of content. All right, Well,

1:12:43.520 --> 1:12:48.400
<v Speaker 1>what's another lingering example of of the bicameral mind. Hey,

1:12:48.439 --> 1:12:50.120
<v Speaker 1>can you think of a state in which people have

1:12:50.240 --> 1:12:54.320
<v Speaker 1>altered consciousness or reduced consciousness and a tendency to obey

1:12:54.400 --> 1:12:57.800
<v Speaker 1>verbal commands? Who sounds a lot like hypnosis to me,

1:12:58.040 --> 1:13:00.680
<v Speaker 1>ding ding ding. There you go. Now, we've talked hypnosis

1:13:00.720 --> 1:13:03.840
<v Speaker 1>on the podcast before, but just to reiterate, what's going

1:13:03.880 --> 1:13:06.679
<v Speaker 1>on with hypnosis is people seem to have wildly differing

1:13:06.760 --> 1:13:11.080
<v Speaker 1>levels of susceptibility to hypnosis. Some people just can't be hypnotized,

1:13:11.160 --> 1:13:13.880
<v Speaker 1>but for those that can, hypnosis does seem to be

1:13:13.920 --> 1:13:17.360
<v Speaker 1>a genuine altered state of consciousness at some level in

1:13:17.400 --> 1:13:21.439
<v Speaker 1>which the body is relaxed, focus is narrowed, inhibition is lowered,

1:13:21.680 --> 1:13:26.320
<v Speaker 1>consciousness is reduced, and verbal obedience is increased. Sounds kind

1:13:26.360 --> 1:13:29.640
<v Speaker 1>of like the model of bicamerality, with a lot of

1:13:29.640 --> 1:13:32.120
<v Speaker 1>these public demonstrations of hypnosis that you see you know,

1:13:32.200 --> 1:13:34.080
<v Speaker 1>or that you're on a cruise ship and somebody's doing

1:13:34.080 --> 1:13:36.960
<v Speaker 1>a show. I think people following the hypnotist commands is

1:13:36.960 --> 1:13:40.280
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily always a highly altered state of consciousness. It

1:13:40.439 --> 1:13:44.080
<v Speaker 1>could be partially just a performance brought on by social pressure.

1:13:44.080 --> 1:13:46.920
<v Speaker 1>But this is actually part of Jane's theory. He talks

1:13:46.920 --> 1:13:51.320
<v Speaker 1>about the idea of collective cognitive imperative. Group pressure enables

1:13:51.400 --> 1:13:54.519
<v Speaker 1>different states of mind and this is why you can

1:13:54.560 --> 1:14:00.479
<v Speaker 1>have uh basically a culture dictating which mindset you adopt,

1:14:00.600 --> 1:14:04.000
<v Speaker 1>the bicameral mindset or the conscious mindset. And it's also

1:14:04.040 --> 1:14:06.639
<v Speaker 1>the reason that you can, through these elaborate rituals, say

1:14:06.640 --> 1:14:10.960
<v Speaker 1>like the Oracle at Delphi, produce these these amazing. Uh,

1:14:11.040 --> 1:14:15.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, metered prophecies out of your right brain because

1:14:15.920 --> 1:14:19.240
<v Speaker 1>group cognitive pressure is putting you into that mindset. And

1:14:19.280 --> 1:14:22.400
<v Speaker 1>so he's saying hypnosis maybe maybe in fact a modern

1:14:22.439 --> 1:14:26.599
<v Speaker 1>reapproximation of the left brain operation of a bicameral person.

1:14:26.720 --> 1:14:29.160
<v Speaker 1>But instead of having the right brain talk, you're having

1:14:29.200 --> 1:14:32.760
<v Speaker 1>the hypnotists talk. And again this makes me think of

1:14:33.040 --> 1:14:35.960
<v Speaker 1>yoga classes where I just let the individual tell me

1:14:36.040 --> 1:14:38.240
<v Speaker 1>what to do for an hour and a half and

1:14:38.280 --> 1:14:43.160
<v Speaker 1>it it feels so liberate. Now, another big area that

1:14:43.240 --> 1:14:45.680
<v Speaker 1>the James spends a lot of time with is the

1:14:45.720 --> 1:14:49.040
<v Speaker 1>condition of schizophrenia. Now, this is obviously going to be

1:14:49.120 --> 1:14:52.120
<v Speaker 1>very relevant because it's one of the features of schizophrenia

1:14:52.280 --> 1:14:56.439
<v Speaker 1>is hallucinations, especially auditory hallucinations. Yeah, it is a condition

1:14:56.479 --> 1:15:00.519
<v Speaker 1>defined by voices, by auditory hallucination voices, the crew, the size,

1:15:00.680 --> 1:15:04.559
<v Speaker 1>voices that tell us what to do it with. Under

1:15:04.600 --> 1:15:07.439
<v Speaker 1>the tent of the bicameral mind hypothesis, it would seem

1:15:07.479 --> 1:15:11.479
<v Speaker 1>to line up pretty well. And uh, and so James

1:15:11.560 --> 1:15:17.360
<v Speaker 1>argues that schizophrenia is essentially a relapse into the bicameral mind. Now,

1:15:17.400 --> 1:15:20.000
<v Speaker 1>he argues that in the sculptures literature, murals and other

1:15:20.080 --> 1:15:23.960
<v Speaker 1>artifacts of the great biicare bicameral civilizations. We do not

1:15:24.120 --> 1:15:27.679
<v Speaker 1>see instances of individuals who suffer madness in a way

1:15:27.680 --> 1:15:32.679
<v Speaker 1>that differentiates them from their fellow humans. There's idiocy, but

1:15:32.680 --> 1:15:35.880
<v Speaker 1>but he says, there's no madness. Uh there, like there's

1:15:35.920 --> 1:15:38.360
<v Speaker 1>no insanity in the Iliad, for instance. Yeah. Now, by

1:15:38.360 --> 1:15:40.960
<v Speaker 1>the time we get to Plato, Plato speaks of madness,

1:15:41.040 --> 1:15:44.559
<v Speaker 1>but in these ancient civilizations, Jane says, you don't see it. Yeah.

1:15:44.600 --> 1:15:47.120
<v Speaker 1>He says that the first instance of insanity discussed in

1:15:47.160 --> 1:15:51.120
<v Speaker 1>the conscious period, uh is in Phaedrus or Plato calls

1:15:51.120 --> 1:15:54.640
<v Speaker 1>insanity quote a divine gift and the source of the

1:15:54.760 --> 1:15:59.120
<v Speaker 1>chiefest blessings granted two men. And then he goes on

1:15:59.200 --> 1:16:02.120
<v Speaker 1>to a Plato ends up identifying four types of madness.

1:16:02.439 --> 1:16:04.719
<v Speaker 1>And you'll and just again think of the bicameral mind

1:16:04.720 --> 1:16:08.560
<v Speaker 1>and reference to all of these prophetic madness, ritual madness,

1:16:08.680 --> 1:16:12.759
<v Speaker 1>poetic madness, and of course the erotic madness. Huh okay,

1:16:12.840 --> 1:16:14.160
<v Speaker 1>So these kind of line up with some of the

1:16:14.160 --> 1:16:18.760
<v Speaker 1>categories we've just been talking about. The Greeks wrote on paranoia,

1:16:19.439 --> 1:16:24.360
<v Speaker 1>he argues, which is literally having of two minds, Over time, however,

1:16:24.479 --> 1:16:26.840
<v Speaker 1>madness is no longer and no longer has these sort

1:16:26.880 --> 1:16:31.280
<v Speaker 1>of divine categories that Plato identified, But it becomes a

1:16:31.320 --> 1:16:33.719
<v Speaker 1>part of an ill, a part of a disease. There's something,

1:16:33.760 --> 1:16:36.080
<v Speaker 1>there's an ailment at work with the human being. Now

1:16:36.120 --> 1:16:39.960
<v Speaker 1>this maybe James thinks, as there is more conscious takeover

1:16:40.040 --> 1:16:43.920
<v Speaker 1>of society by the conscious culture, that it becomes untenable

1:16:44.000 --> 1:16:49.080
<v Speaker 1>for for bicameral society to exist and work within itself.

1:16:49.400 --> 1:16:52.639
<v Speaker 1>So people who experienced the bicameral mindset within a conscious

1:16:52.680 --> 1:16:56.759
<v Speaker 1>culture have they essentially have no cover. They have no

1:16:56.760 --> 1:17:00.960
<v Speaker 1>nobody to like be part of their culture right now.

1:17:00.960 --> 1:17:03.519
<v Speaker 1>He also points out that the voices of schizophrenia these

1:17:03.560 --> 1:17:06.040
<v Speaker 1>tend to be When I say the voices of schizophrenia,

1:17:06.080 --> 1:17:10.040
<v Speaker 1>the voice is heard by individuals with schizophrenia. They tend

1:17:10.080 --> 1:17:13.800
<v Speaker 1>to be authority figures created out of cultural expectation. And

1:17:13.840 --> 1:17:16.599
<v Speaker 1>the hallucinations also seem to have access to more memories

1:17:16.600 --> 1:17:19.360
<v Speaker 1>in the patient. There in many cases and in many

1:17:19.400 --> 1:17:23.520
<v Speaker 1>cases they replace thought. The they frequently take on religious

1:17:23.560 --> 1:17:27.560
<v Speaker 1>overtones because he says, the condition emerges from the neurological

1:17:27.640 --> 1:17:30.240
<v Speaker 1>structures bound to the birth of religious thought. To begin

1:17:30.320 --> 1:17:34.759
<v Speaker 1>with and he says that the there's also a frequency

1:17:34.760 --> 1:17:39.560
<v Speaker 1>of religious experience overall in the waking state for human consciousness,

1:17:39.560 --> 1:17:44.000
<v Speaker 1>the the hypnopompic state that is often accompanied by vivid,

1:17:44.080 --> 1:17:47.320
<v Speaker 1>lingering imagery. We've discussed this in terms of sleep paralysis

1:17:47.439 --> 1:17:52.000
<v Speaker 1>and supernatural experience before. James writes that these parts of

1:17:52.040 --> 1:17:55.400
<v Speaker 1>the brain are quote released from their normal inhibition by

1:17:55.479 --> 1:18:01.160
<v Speaker 1>abnormal biochemistry in many cases of schizophrenia, and particularized into experience.

1:18:01.520 --> 1:18:04.320
<v Speaker 1>This is also telling. He points to the relative inability

1:18:04.320 --> 1:18:07.360
<v Speaker 1>of schizophrenics to draw a person. Think again to our

1:18:07.400 --> 1:18:11.240
<v Speaker 1>discussions of I and me. There's this draw a person

1:18:11.320 --> 1:18:14.320
<v Speaker 1>test or adapt test, and it's used to help identify

1:18:14.400 --> 1:18:18.679
<v Speaker 1>schizophrenia and other conditions by asking the individual to draw

1:18:18.800 --> 1:18:21.839
<v Speaker 1>a person. Now, if you have trouble drawing a whole person,

1:18:22.680 --> 1:18:25.679
<v Speaker 1>that kind of makes me think about those disembodied body

1:18:25.800 --> 1:18:29.519
<v Speaker 1>parts you talked about with reference to the iliad. And

1:18:29.760 --> 1:18:31.400
<v Speaker 1>and I have to point out this is another thing

1:18:31.439 --> 1:18:34.120
<v Speaker 1>I see my son having to do on kindergarten tests

1:18:34.560 --> 1:18:38.000
<v Speaker 1>and uh, in evaluations draw a person and and see,

1:18:38.320 --> 1:18:40.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean they're also looking to see with what degree

1:18:40.080 --> 1:18:43.880
<v Speaker 1>of accuracy you can pull them together. But uh, but Yeah,

1:18:43.920 --> 1:18:47.040
<v Speaker 1>in this case, are you able to draw a complete

1:18:47.080 --> 1:18:50.000
<v Speaker 1>person at all? Now, not all people who have schizophrenia

1:18:50.040 --> 1:18:52.600
<v Speaker 1>are going to have trouble drawing a person, right, but

1:18:52.640 --> 1:18:56.440
<v Speaker 1>when they do, it is uh, it is extremely diagnostic.

1:18:56.840 --> 1:19:01.280
<v Speaker 1>Also with schizophrenia, neurotization can also become impossible. You see

1:19:01.280 --> 1:19:05.360
<v Speaker 1>these like fractured self stories, right hues. And then there's

1:19:05.400 --> 1:19:09.360
<v Speaker 1>also body image boundary disturbance or boundary loss and this

1:19:09.439 --> 1:19:12.880
<v Speaker 1>again this ties into this uh, this lost sense of

1:19:13.000 --> 1:19:17.960
<v Speaker 1>eye or me. And remember too that schizophrenia has a

1:19:18.000 --> 1:19:23.679
<v Speaker 1>genetic inherited basis to the underlying biochemistry. Natural selection, James

1:19:23.840 --> 1:19:26.160
<v Speaker 1>argue would have favored it for a while. There's a

1:19:26.160 --> 1:19:29.400
<v Speaker 1>certain tirelessness in schizophrenic individuals. They seem to have a

1:19:29.439 --> 1:19:32.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of energy, and in the bicameral individual this would

1:19:32.960 --> 1:19:35.960
<v Speaker 1>have become this would have become very important if you were, say,

1:19:36.040 --> 1:19:38.880
<v Speaker 1>building pyramids or are there great works? Yeah, I mean

1:19:38.880 --> 1:19:40.599
<v Speaker 1>we were talking about. One of the advantages, or one

1:19:40.600 --> 1:19:43.040
<v Speaker 1>of the possible advantages of a bicameral mind would be

1:19:43.080 --> 1:19:46.439
<v Speaker 1>mental endurance, much more so than a conscious person could muster.

1:19:46.800 --> 1:19:49.439
<v Speaker 1>So James basically says that the modern schizophrenic is an

1:19:49.520 --> 1:19:54.320
<v Speaker 1>individual that's essentially in search of a bicameral culture. Quote,

1:19:54.320 --> 1:19:57.840
<v Speaker 1>but he retains usually some part of the subjective consciousness

1:19:58.080 --> 1:20:02.120
<v Speaker 1>that struggles against this more emitive mental organization, that tries

1:20:02.160 --> 1:20:04.559
<v Speaker 1>to establish some kind of control in the middle of

1:20:04.560 --> 1:20:07.960
<v Speaker 1>a mental organization in which the hallucination ought to do

1:20:08.040 --> 1:20:11.400
<v Speaker 1>the controlling. In effect, he is a mind barred to

1:20:11.479 --> 1:20:16.040
<v Speaker 1>his environment, waiting on God's in a godless world. Okay,

1:20:16.080 --> 1:20:19.719
<v Speaker 1>so you convinced yet, Joe. I mean, it's tough because

1:20:19.800 --> 1:20:23.800
<v Speaker 1>I do find his argument very compelling, but it just

1:20:23.960 --> 1:20:27.000
<v Speaker 1>may be the case that he was wrong about how

1:20:27.040 --> 1:20:29.200
<v Speaker 1>about some of the evidence that he claims, or about

1:20:29.200 --> 1:20:32.840
<v Speaker 1>how he interprets some of that evidence. So I don't know.

1:20:32.920 --> 1:20:36.760
<v Speaker 1>I find the bi cameral mind thesis very interesting and

1:20:36.880 --> 1:20:40.040
<v Speaker 1>very compelling, but I do not consider myself convinced that

1:20:40.120 --> 1:20:43.719
<v Speaker 1>it is correct true. And with like with the schizophrenia evidence,

1:20:43.760 --> 1:20:47.479
<v Speaker 1>for instance, is this is this truly more evidence in

1:20:47.479 --> 1:20:52.200
<v Speaker 1>support of bicameral mind theory or is this schizophrenia as

1:20:52.280 --> 1:20:55.960
<v Speaker 1>explained with bicameral mind. Yeah. I mean, one way you

1:20:55.960 --> 1:20:57.800
<v Speaker 1>could look at the bi cameral mind is you could

1:20:57.800 --> 1:21:00.600
<v Speaker 1>say it's a theory that explains a lot or you

1:21:00.640 --> 1:21:04.960
<v Speaker 1>could say that it is a very interesting, carefully conducted

1:21:05.080 --> 1:21:08.599
<v Speaker 1>story that's overlaid on lots of evidence that we already

1:21:08.640 --> 1:21:11.760
<v Speaker 1>knew about. So what would be really interesting about it

1:21:11.760 --> 1:21:15.960
<v Speaker 1>would be can it predict new discoveries like, based on

1:21:16.120 --> 1:21:19.400
<v Speaker 1>the assumption of the bicameral mind hypothesis, would you be

1:21:19.439 --> 1:21:22.080
<v Speaker 1>able to predict will find X, Y, and z about

1:21:22.120 --> 1:21:26.040
<v Speaker 1>the ancient world and about neuroscientific discoveries in the future,

1:21:26.080 --> 1:21:29.479
<v Speaker 1>say with you know, uh a neuroimaging, and that would

1:21:29.520 --> 1:21:31.640
<v Speaker 1>be a real good way of testing whether it has

1:21:31.680 --> 1:21:34.160
<v Speaker 1>any predictive power and thus whether we can have any

1:21:34.200 --> 1:21:36.680
<v Speaker 1>confidence that it will continue to have predictive power in

1:21:36.680 --> 1:21:39.400
<v Speaker 1>the future, which is pretty much synonymous with saying there's

1:21:39.439 --> 1:21:42.400
<v Speaker 1>something to it, that it might be true. Uh So

1:21:42.760 --> 1:21:44.439
<v Speaker 1>I tried to look up you know what if people

1:21:44.479 --> 1:21:47.360
<v Speaker 1>said about it and the theory. It's had lots of critics,

1:21:47.400 --> 1:21:49.680
<v Speaker 1>It has lots of people, you know, it's always been

1:21:49.720 --> 1:21:53.400
<v Speaker 1>controversial ever since it was first introduced. It's had supporters.

1:21:53.439 --> 1:21:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Some people think that it's it's really interesting, there's something

1:21:57.120 --> 1:21:59.559
<v Speaker 1>to it. Some people think it might shed some light

1:21:59.600 --> 1:22:02.599
<v Speaker 1>on some issues, even if it's wrong. Overall, it's had

1:22:02.640 --> 1:22:04.559
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people who think it's just bunk. So

1:22:04.720 --> 1:22:08.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's opinions all over the place. One paper

1:22:08.920 --> 1:22:11.519
<v Speaker 1>I found that I thought summarized well some of the

1:22:11.600 --> 1:22:15.599
<v Speaker 1>neuro scientific evidence and implications is a paper by Leo

1:22:15.680 --> 1:22:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Share published in the Journal of Psychology or Psychiatry and

1:22:18.840 --> 1:22:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Neuroscience in two thousand. Leo Share is a professor of

1:22:22.200 --> 1:22:24.600
<v Speaker 1>psychiatry at Mount Sinai and New York, and in the

1:22:24.640 --> 1:22:28.080
<v Speaker 1>short piece he collects some relevant reactions to Jane's hypothesis

1:22:28.080 --> 1:22:31.920
<v Speaker 1>and argument. Uh Some reactions to Jane's include He finds

1:22:31.960 --> 1:22:35.600
<v Speaker 1>that in seven Assade and Shapiro published a criticism of

1:22:35.680 --> 1:22:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Jane's work in the American Journal of Psychiatry, and they write, quote,

1:22:40.040 --> 1:22:43.120
<v Speaker 1>the difficulty which we find with Jane's hypothesis is that

1:22:43.200 --> 1:22:46.920
<v Speaker 1>the conclusions he draws have a questionable basis in neuropsychiatric

1:22:47.000 --> 1:22:50.760
<v Speaker 1>fact and quote. If Jane's hypothesis were to coincide more

1:22:50.800 --> 1:22:54.280
<v Speaker 1>accurately with anatomic fact facts about what we find in

1:22:54.320 --> 1:22:57.760
<v Speaker 1>the body, the right temporal area in question would more

1:22:57.840 --> 1:23:01.479
<v Speaker 1>likely coincide with Broca's expressive area, a notion that does

1:23:01.520 --> 1:23:06.759
<v Speaker 1>not conveniently fit Jane's theoretical constructs. Assad and Shapiro. Shapiro

1:23:06.840 --> 1:23:10.320
<v Speaker 1>also claim, according to Share that quote lesions of the

1:23:10.439 --> 1:23:14.280
<v Speaker 1>right sided areas corresponding to Broca's and Wernicke's areas seem

1:23:14.360 --> 1:23:18.040
<v Speaker 1>more related to the negative symptoms of schizophrenia like restricted

1:23:18.080 --> 1:23:22.760
<v Speaker 1>affect than to the positive hallucinatory symptoms unquote, and they

1:23:22.800 --> 1:23:27.639
<v Speaker 1>also claim that Jane's oversimplified the phenomenology of hallucinatory experience

1:23:27.680 --> 1:23:32.040
<v Speaker 1>to make them fit his hypothesis better. Um. Also in nine,

1:23:33.000 --> 1:23:36.800
<v Speaker 1>the International Journal of Psychophysiology published a letter that wrote, quote,

1:23:36.800 --> 1:23:40.479
<v Speaker 1>after many years of psychophysiological studies mainly carried out in

1:23:40.520 --> 1:23:44.320
<v Speaker 1>the field, if evoked to neurocognitive bioelectrical events, I feel

1:23:44.320 --> 1:23:46.679
<v Speaker 1>I can safely state that the concepts of the mind

1:23:46.720 --> 1:23:50.599
<v Speaker 1>slash brain and the brain slash behavior dualisms, with their ancient,

1:23:50.640 --> 1:23:54.840
<v Speaker 1>widespread and persistent philosophy, are now all outdated, as are

1:23:54.920 --> 1:23:59.160
<v Speaker 1>those of the bicameral mind or the double brain. Then again, however,

1:23:59.280 --> 1:24:02.639
<v Speaker 1>Shares says in nine paper published in The Lancet by

1:24:02.640 --> 1:24:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Olan claimed that research in neuroimaging has quote illuminated and

1:24:06.920 --> 1:24:11.240
<v Speaker 1>confirmed the importance of Jane's hypothesis. And this research includes

1:24:11.680 --> 1:24:14.800
<v Speaker 1>a paper in the Lancet nine by Lennox at All,

1:24:14.880 --> 1:24:19.040
<v Speaker 1>in which a right handed person with schizophrenia underwent neuroimaging

1:24:19.120 --> 1:24:23.120
<v Speaker 1>during hallucinations, and the authors found that the auditory hallucinations

1:24:23.120 --> 1:24:26.040
<v Speaker 1>occurred in the right hemisphere but not the left hemisphere,

1:24:26.080 --> 1:24:29.439
<v Speaker 1>which would match up with Jane's predictions, the predictions made

1:24:29.479 --> 1:24:33.280
<v Speaker 1>by the bicameral mind hypothesis. So I'd say it's still

1:24:33.360 --> 1:24:36.400
<v Speaker 1>in the realm of something that is interesting but definitely

1:24:36.439 --> 1:24:40.200
<v Speaker 1>not proven. But just imagine how fascinating it would be

1:24:40.240 --> 1:24:43.080
<v Speaker 1>if more and more studies start lining up with stuff

1:24:43.120 --> 1:24:48.200
<v Speaker 1>that could be predicted directly by the bicameral mind hypothesis. Indeed, yeah,

1:24:48.240 --> 1:24:50.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's that's the great thing about the about

1:24:50.960 --> 1:24:54.200
<v Speaker 1>this particular hypothesis is that we can continue to study it.

1:24:54.240 --> 1:24:57.759
<v Speaker 1>We can continue to see how how it potentially lines

1:24:57.880 --> 1:25:02.240
<v Speaker 1>up with their modern scientific understanding of consciousness and the brain.

1:25:02.560 --> 1:25:04.599
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I guess we can start wrapping up here.

1:25:04.600 --> 1:25:06.479
<v Speaker 1>But I want to say, in the end, though I'm

1:25:06.479 --> 1:25:10.280
<v Speaker 1>not convinced by I'm not advocating it as true, it's fascinating,

1:25:10.439 --> 1:25:14.320
<v Speaker 1>very well argued, I would say, arguably quite brilliant in

1:25:14.360 --> 1:25:16.519
<v Speaker 1>the way it pulls from so many disciplines into a

1:25:16.520 --> 1:25:21.439
<v Speaker 1>coherent picture of a cross disciplinary hypothesis, but can't yet

1:25:21.520 --> 1:25:24.280
<v Speaker 1>endorse it. Yeah, yeah, I would, I would agree, But

1:25:24.360 --> 1:25:26.880
<v Speaker 1>it is it is fascinating to use it as a

1:25:26.920 --> 1:25:30.280
<v Speaker 1>thought exercise for looking back on past cultures. And uh,

1:25:30.320 --> 1:25:32.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, after I was reading it, I kept I

1:25:32.560 --> 1:25:34.400
<v Speaker 1>was wondering, well, why don't we see this reference to

1:25:34.479 --> 1:25:38.040
<v Speaker 1>more works of fiction. Well, it turns out it was

1:25:38.120 --> 1:25:41.120
<v Speaker 1>apparently one of the key influences on Neil Stephens snow Crash,

1:25:41.720 --> 1:25:44.120
<v Speaker 1>which we mentioned in our Tower of Babble episode. It's

1:25:44.160 --> 1:25:49.719
<v Speaker 1>a cyberpunk classic then involves a linguistic momentic weapons um

1:25:49.720 --> 1:25:51.759
<v Speaker 1>which you know, go back and listen to that episode

1:25:51.760 --> 1:25:54.080
<v Speaker 1>of certainly read snow Crash if you want more than that.

1:25:54.600 --> 1:25:57.200
<v Speaker 1>But I was not familiar with this book. There is

1:25:57.280 --> 1:26:01.000
<v Speaker 1>a two thousand nine novel by Terence Hawkins titled The

1:26:01.120 --> 1:26:04.360
<v Speaker 1>Rage of Achilles and get this. It's a novel of

1:26:04.360 --> 1:26:08.600
<v Speaker 1>the Trojan War told within the confines of the bicameral

1:26:08.760 --> 1:26:14.680
<v Speaker 1>mind hypothesis. So Odysseus is a conscious modern man in

1:26:14.680 --> 1:26:18.080
<v Speaker 1>this and Achilles is a bicameral killing machine. That is

1:26:18.120 --> 1:26:21.479
<v Speaker 1>a brilliant concept for a novel, and if there's any

1:26:21.479 --> 1:26:24.280
<v Speaker 1>truth to Jane's vision, this might have actually been possible.

1:26:24.360 --> 1:26:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Like during the long slow breakdown to the bicameral mind,

1:26:27.560 --> 1:26:30.599
<v Speaker 1>conscious people and bicameral people would have had to encounter

1:26:30.680 --> 1:26:33.400
<v Speaker 1>and deal with one another. And can you just imagine

1:26:33.400 --> 1:26:37.759
<v Speaker 1>all the difficulty that would create. Yeah, but for both sides,

1:26:37.800 --> 1:26:41.200
<v Speaker 1>because on one hand, the conscious human is capable of

1:26:41.240 --> 1:26:44.680
<v Speaker 1>deception that the bicameral human has no ability to. Like

1:26:44.720 --> 1:26:47.679
<v Speaker 1>basically comes down to that that duel in a game

1:26:47.720 --> 1:26:52.240
<v Speaker 1>of Thrones between the Mountain and uh, what's his name?

1:26:52.360 --> 1:26:55.360
<v Speaker 1>The over and Martel. Yeah, yeah, where one is one

1:26:55.439 --> 1:26:57.760
<v Speaker 1>is crafty and deceptive and the other one is just

1:26:57.880 --> 1:27:01.760
<v Speaker 1>pure brute strength and NonStop killing action. Yeah. So you're

1:27:01.800 --> 1:27:05.120
<v Speaker 1>saying the Mountain is bicameral and the Red Viper of

1:27:05.160 --> 1:27:07.479
<v Speaker 1>Dorn is conscious. I think so. And really, I mean

1:27:07.520 --> 1:27:12.760
<v Speaker 1>he only becomes more bicameral story progresses, all right, So

1:27:12.800 --> 1:27:16.280
<v Speaker 1>there you have it. Do you have an anything else, Joe? No,

1:27:16.479 --> 1:27:18.600
<v Speaker 1>I guess that's it for now. I I found this

1:27:18.680 --> 1:27:21.719
<v Speaker 1>a really fascinating topic to explore. It's one of those

1:27:21.760 --> 1:27:23.720
<v Speaker 1>that I've said this a few times now, but I

1:27:23.760 --> 1:27:25.880
<v Speaker 1>just want to stress again it's like I feel this

1:27:26.000 --> 1:27:30.120
<v Speaker 1>conflict within me about the ideas that are so cool.

1:27:30.280 --> 1:27:33.360
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I have to be especially suspicious of them,

1:27:34.000 --> 1:27:36.639
<v Speaker 1>Like the more interesting they are, the more I feel

1:27:36.680 --> 1:27:39.040
<v Speaker 1>like I have to really check my desire for it

1:27:39.080 --> 1:27:43.760
<v Speaker 1>to be true. Yeah, especially an idea that's this expansive

1:27:43.880 --> 1:27:47.200
<v Speaker 1>that concerns the history of our species and our civilizations

1:27:47.640 --> 1:27:50.400
<v Speaker 1>and the very nature of consciousness. So it's not like

1:27:50.720 --> 1:27:53.360
<v Speaker 1>buying into a single idea like, oh well, actually I

1:27:53.360 --> 1:27:56.640
<v Speaker 1>think the Chinese discovered North America, you know, before the

1:27:56.760 --> 1:27:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Vikings something like that, which I'm not saying that doesn't

1:27:59.400 --> 1:28:04.160
<v Speaker 1>have large historical ramifications, but it's not something that just

1:28:04.200 --> 1:28:08.280
<v Speaker 1>affects the absolute understanding of our species in our way

1:28:08.280 --> 1:28:11.920
<v Speaker 1>of thinking. All right, well, of course we'd love to

1:28:11.920 --> 1:28:13.680
<v Speaker 1>hear from all of you out there. What are your

1:28:13.720 --> 1:28:17.360
<v Speaker 1>thoughts on the bicameral mind. Do you buy into it?

1:28:17.640 --> 1:28:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Do you do you think it's complete bunk? Do you

1:28:20.000 --> 1:28:22.639
<v Speaker 1>have some sort of middle ground there? And what are

1:28:22.680 --> 1:28:26.200
<v Speaker 1>some really cool examples of its utilization in various sorts

1:28:26.200 --> 1:28:28.559
<v Speaker 1>of fiction that you've encountered. Here's something I would like

1:28:28.600 --> 1:28:32.800
<v Speaker 1>to employ your imagination on, if this could happen, If

1:28:32.800 --> 1:28:34.400
<v Speaker 1>you could go from a bi cameral mind to a

1:28:34.439 --> 1:28:38.760
<v Speaker 1>conscious mind. How much more could human mentality change? Like

1:28:38.920 --> 1:28:41.760
<v Speaker 1>if you go three thousand years into the future from now,

1:28:42.320 --> 1:28:45.719
<v Speaker 1>could our mindsets be as different from from hours now

1:28:45.880 --> 1:28:50.280
<v Speaker 1>as the conscious mind is from the hypothetical bi cameral mind? Yeah,

1:28:50.320 --> 1:28:53.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, am I engaging in a bicameral experience when

1:28:53.080 --> 1:28:55.679
<v Speaker 1>I let my GPS device tell me where to drive?

1:28:56.320 --> 1:28:59.679
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, do you totally relinquish conscious control? Yeah?

1:28:59.720 --> 1:29:03.040
<v Speaker 1>I almost, It's almost to that level. Uh that I

1:29:03.160 --> 1:29:06.120
<v Speaker 1>was hanging out with my family over the weekend and

1:29:06.360 --> 1:29:08.280
<v Speaker 1>my sisters were like asking me, like, why did you

1:29:08.320 --> 1:29:09.800
<v Speaker 1>make this turn in that it's said of this turn?

1:29:09.840 --> 1:29:11.800
<v Speaker 1>And I'm like, I just do what the machine tells

1:29:11.840 --> 1:29:13.960
<v Speaker 1>me to told me to drive into the ocean. Yeah,

1:29:14.000 --> 1:29:17.599
<v Speaker 1>I put my trust in the machine. It's by and large,

1:29:17.800 --> 1:29:20.280
<v Speaker 1>there's a less uh, there's less of a chance that

1:29:20.439 --> 1:29:22.120
<v Speaker 1>it will drive me in the ocean that I will

1:29:22.200 --> 1:29:25.120
<v Speaker 1>drive me into the ocean. So uh, that's how it

1:29:25.120 --> 1:29:27.240
<v Speaker 1>shakes out, all right. Well, you can find is It's

1:29:27.240 --> 1:29:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Stuff to Blow your Mind dot com. That's where you'll

1:29:29.240 --> 1:29:32.960
<v Speaker 1>find all the episodes that you will find, blog post videos,

1:29:32.960 --> 1:29:34.639
<v Speaker 1>you will find links out to our verious social media

1:29:34.640 --> 1:29:38.479
<v Speaker 1>accounts such as Facebook, Twitter, Tumbler, Instagram, and more. Hey,

1:29:38.520 --> 1:29:42.439
<v Speaker 1>Facebook has that great UH Discussion module group where you

1:29:42.479 --> 1:29:45.240
<v Speaker 1>can join up and you can interact with us, but

1:29:45.280 --> 1:29:49.200
<v Speaker 1>also other listeners to the show and you can discuss

1:29:49.240 --> 1:29:52.680
<v Speaker 1>episodes such as these with those individuals. And if you

1:29:52.680 --> 1:29:54.599
<v Speaker 1>want to get in touch with us directly, as always,

1:29:54.640 --> 1:29:57.000
<v Speaker 1>you can email us at blow the Mind at how

1:29:57.040 --> 1:30:10.040
<v Speaker 1>stuff works dot com for more on this and thousands

1:30:10.040 --> 1:30:35.200
<v Speaker 1>of other topics. Is it how stuff works dot com.

1:30:18.760 --> 1:30:18.800
<v Speaker 1>The