WEBVTT - Her with Jesse David Fox

0:00:00.920 --> 0:00:03.920
<v Speaker 1>On the Doll Cast, the questions asked if movies have

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:07.920
<v Speaker 1>women in them? Are all their discussions just boyfriends and husbands?

0:00:08.080 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Do they have individualism? The patriarchy? Zef invest start changing

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:16.840
<v Speaker 1>it with the beck Del Cast. Hello, and welcome to

0:00:16.840 --> 0:00:18.800
<v Speaker 1>the back Del Cast. My name is Jamie Loftus and

0:00:18.840 --> 0:00:21.040
<v Speaker 1>my name is Caitlin Darante, and this is our podcast

0:00:21.079 --> 0:00:25.480
<v Speaker 1>where we discuss the representation of women in cinema. You're right?

0:00:25.680 --> 0:00:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Can you totally have like cheese voice right now? Can

0:00:30.280 --> 0:00:32.360
<v Speaker 1>you kind of hear that? I just like more or

0:00:32.440 --> 0:00:36.839
<v Speaker 1>less deep throated a Baby Bell. I can hear it

0:00:36.840 --> 0:00:40.120
<v Speaker 1>in my voice? You can, I don't especially hear anything,

0:00:40.159 --> 0:00:42.199
<v Speaker 1>but I'm also full of dairy. I just ate a

0:00:42.240 --> 0:00:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Klondike bar, so not Wow. Now we have to be

0:00:45.760 --> 0:00:47.960
<v Speaker 1>care because now we're on now we're on a network,

0:00:48.000 --> 0:00:51.400
<v Speaker 1>and that wasn't a paid advertisement. We just we just

0:00:51.440 --> 0:00:54.640
<v Speaker 1>appreciate those dairy products. But if Klondike Bar and Baby

0:00:54.640 --> 0:00:57.639
<v Speaker 1>Bell do want to give us money, we will take it.

0:00:58.000 --> 0:00:59.800
<v Speaker 1>I just had to wash down that Baby Bell with

0:00:59.840 --> 0:01:05.479
<v Speaker 1>a gulp of diet coke. I feel I just felt

0:01:05.560 --> 0:01:08.000
<v Speaker 1>so insecure about my cheese voice. But I do think

0:01:08.319 --> 0:01:12.080
<v Speaker 1>listeners hop into my mentions. Tell me, have you ever

0:01:12.160 --> 0:01:16.679
<v Speaker 1>had cheese voice? Have you? I'm daring to start a

0:01:16.720 --> 0:01:22.360
<v Speaker 1>dialogue today, Well, represent hey, Caitlin. Even though we were

0:01:22.360 --> 0:01:26.040
<v Speaker 1>talking about products. That conversation did pass the Bechdel test.

0:01:26.080 --> 0:01:29.000
<v Speaker 1>I would say it did. OK. Well, what is the

0:01:29.040 --> 0:01:31.119
<v Speaker 1>Bectel test. Well, it's just a test that you apply

0:01:31.280 --> 0:01:34.560
<v Speaker 1>to media and it requires that the movie. Let's say

0:01:34.680 --> 0:01:40.720
<v Speaker 1>you're watching the movie cheese breath. Let's chee breath, cheating

0:01:40.920 --> 0:01:42.959
<v Speaker 1>cheese voice. Okay, don't get close to my mouth though

0:01:43.240 --> 0:01:47.640
<v Speaker 1>probably cheese breath also, sure, So whatever movie you're watching, Uh,

0:01:48.040 --> 0:01:51.200
<v Speaker 1>the Becktel test requires that it has at least two

0:01:51.280 --> 0:01:55.040
<v Speaker 1>female identifying characters with names who speak to each other,

0:01:55.120 --> 0:01:58.600
<v Speaker 1>and their conversation cannot be about a man. You'd think

0:01:58.600 --> 0:02:02.080
<v Speaker 1>it would be easy, and we've got an interesting one today.

0:02:02.200 --> 0:02:05.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm excited to talk about this movie. It's one

0:02:05.760 --> 0:02:08.200
<v Speaker 1>of those ones where I was ambivalent about it when

0:02:08.200 --> 0:02:10.919
<v Speaker 1>it came out, and I have a lot more thoughts

0:02:10.960 --> 0:02:14.040
<v Speaker 1>and questions about it now. Forty five minutes of this

0:02:14.120 --> 0:02:18.800
<v Speaker 1>movie is what Keen Phoenix sauntering around. However, that describes

0:02:18.840 --> 0:02:21.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of Fucken Phoenix movies and so that doesn't

0:02:21.760 --> 0:02:23.840
<v Speaker 1>even really narrow it down. He's literally in a movie

0:02:23.840 --> 0:02:27.079
<v Speaker 1>called Walk the Line, where I imagine he's just walking

0:02:27.639 --> 0:02:30.280
<v Speaker 1>the line. That's what that movie is about. It's a

0:02:30.360 --> 0:02:33.640
<v Speaker 1>very famous movie about walking in the straight line. In

0:02:33.680 --> 0:02:36.799
<v Speaker 1>this movie, we have Amy Adams. It's not doubt so

0:02:36.960 --> 0:02:40.720
<v Speaker 1>already that is points against it. We're talking about the

0:02:40.720 --> 0:02:44.160
<v Speaker 1>movie Her, and here to join us in that conversation

0:02:44.639 --> 0:02:48.720
<v Speaker 1>is our wonderful guest. He's the senior editor at Vulture

0:02:48.840 --> 0:02:52.160
<v Speaker 1>and he's the host of Good One podcast, currently in

0:02:52.200 --> 0:02:57.520
<v Speaker 1>its third season. Jesse David Fox. Hi, thanks for being here.

0:02:59.040 --> 0:03:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about or relationship to the movie Her. When

0:03:02.760 --> 0:03:07.520
<v Speaker 1>did you first see What's your relationship? I forgot this.

0:03:07.840 --> 0:03:09.880
<v Speaker 1>I was watching it. I was like, oh, I watched

0:03:09.880 --> 0:03:12.760
<v Speaker 1>it on a screener on a date. All I remember

0:03:12.960 --> 0:03:18.440
<v Speaker 1>is she would sigh when interesting things happened. Her would

0:03:19.000 --> 0:03:25.800
<v Speaker 1>her this, this bodied woman would be like your date, okay.

0:03:25.919 --> 0:03:28.280
<v Speaker 1>And I appreciate that she liked movies. So then I

0:03:28.360 --> 0:03:31.680
<v Speaker 1>think I watched it again immediately afterwards to get it.

0:03:31.840 --> 0:03:36.400
<v Speaker 1>And then I remember liking it so much. I remember

0:03:36.560 --> 0:03:41.160
<v Speaker 1>liking how it looked. I illegally downloaded this score. Um,

0:03:41.320 --> 0:03:43.720
<v Speaker 1>I tried to figure out ways to get the clothes

0:03:43.720 --> 0:03:46.600
<v Speaker 1>for free to write stories about, like, oh, I try

0:03:46.640 --> 0:03:50.640
<v Speaker 1>to wear those pants for And that's where it stayed

0:03:50.680 --> 0:03:52.760
<v Speaker 1>frozen in my brain of like, that's a movie I

0:03:52.800 --> 0:03:55.480
<v Speaker 1>really liked and thought about a lot for a time

0:03:55.560 --> 0:03:59.280
<v Speaker 1>and then didn't reinvestigate until last night. And now I

0:03:59.320 --> 0:04:03.320
<v Speaker 1>feel very confused about it. I see, wow, I'm so

0:04:03.360 --> 0:04:05.840
<v Speaker 1>excited to talk about this. Then, yeah, this is a

0:04:05.840 --> 0:04:07.960
<v Speaker 1>tricky one. This is one of those movies I think

0:04:08.080 --> 0:04:12.120
<v Speaker 1>that occupies that. Like, my little brother loved this movie

0:04:12.120 --> 0:04:16.359
<v Speaker 1>when it came out because he was uh teenage boy

0:04:16.600 --> 0:04:20.880
<v Speaker 1>who I think identified strongly with Theodore. I think this

0:04:20.960 --> 0:04:23.000
<v Speaker 1>is a case for a lot of specifically men who

0:04:23.040 --> 0:04:25.240
<v Speaker 1>saw this movie there they're like, you know what, I

0:04:26.120 --> 0:04:31.000
<v Speaker 1>don't fuck enough. And the thing with this movie, I

0:04:31.000 --> 0:04:33.200
<v Speaker 1>think that there are a lot of good things about

0:04:33.200 --> 0:04:35.359
<v Speaker 1>this movie. I think that there's a lot of backwards

0:04:35.400 --> 0:04:37.600
<v Speaker 1>things about this movie. There's a lot, definitely a lot

0:04:37.680 --> 0:04:40.680
<v Speaker 1>to talk about. No matter what way you spend it.

0:04:40.960 --> 0:04:44.720
<v Speaker 1>This movie is very boring. Unfortunately, there's a lot of

0:04:44.720 --> 0:04:47.000
<v Speaker 1>stuff to discuss. However, it is one of the most

0:04:47.000 --> 0:04:50.400
<v Speaker 1>boring movies of all time. It's a Jones joint as

0:04:50.400 --> 0:04:54.320
<v Speaker 1>we like to say here and kidding, we don't um,

0:04:54.839 --> 0:04:58.920
<v Speaker 1>but it's a Spike Jones written directed. Yes, it's weird

0:04:59.000 --> 0:05:01.680
<v Speaker 1>because I I'm interested in when you think about this,

0:05:02.200 --> 0:05:05.880
<v Speaker 1>I do think that Spike Jones is well aware that

0:05:06.000 --> 0:05:11.680
<v Speaker 1>his protagonist is deeply flawed and is essentially wrong in

0:05:11.720 --> 0:05:14.640
<v Speaker 1>most of the choices he makes. However, I don't think

0:05:14.640 --> 0:05:17.800
<v Speaker 1>that that is clearly communicated enough in the movie. And

0:05:17.839 --> 0:05:20.839
<v Speaker 1>that's why there's going to be this horde of guys

0:05:20.880 --> 0:05:23.200
<v Speaker 1>who feel they don't fuck enough that will love this

0:05:23.240 --> 0:05:26.640
<v Speaker 1>movie because there's not a lot of accountability, and there's

0:05:26.640 --> 0:05:28.520
<v Speaker 1>not a lot of blowback, and there's not a lot

0:05:28.560 --> 0:05:32.920
<v Speaker 1>of you know, it's like, it's Theodore. He's gonna be fine,

0:05:32.960 --> 0:05:35.800
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna coast through life because of who he is.

0:05:36.560 --> 0:05:38.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I don't need to see what keen

0:05:38.839 --> 0:05:41.919
<v Speaker 1>Phoenix saunter around. I simply don't. Well, when did you

0:05:41.960 --> 0:05:44.000
<v Speaker 1>first see the movie? I thought when he came out,

0:05:44.440 --> 0:05:46.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, when I was in college at the time,

0:05:46.800 --> 0:05:49.480
<v Speaker 1>I just remember being like, well, that was fucking boring.

0:05:50.360 --> 0:05:54.120
<v Speaker 1>And now I think, well, that was fucking boring, and

0:05:54.440 --> 0:05:56.279
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that, and I think it gets a

0:05:56.279 --> 0:06:00.520
<v Speaker 1>lot most things wrong. Yeah, there was like a pretty

0:06:00.760 --> 0:06:03.000
<v Speaker 1>big response to this movie, as you said, like a

0:06:03.000 --> 0:06:09.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of people really, especially I feel like in the

0:06:10.000 --> 0:06:12.360
<v Speaker 1>world imagine we all run in. This was like an

0:06:12.360 --> 0:06:15.720
<v Speaker 1>adventurous size movie for people who live in cool neighborhoods

0:06:15.720 --> 0:06:18.400
<v Speaker 1>in large cities, and then like not a movie anyone

0:06:18.440 --> 0:06:21.560
<v Speaker 1>who care about though. I just relearned that it won

0:06:21.600 --> 0:06:26.360
<v Speaker 1>an Oscar for what category? Guess was it? Screenplay? Which

0:06:26.400 --> 0:06:30.720
<v Speaker 1>is the thing the least because thinking about is like,

0:06:30.760 --> 0:06:33.520
<v Speaker 1>the worst thing about this movie is its screenplay. It's

0:06:34.240 --> 0:06:37.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I don't know, it's we could we could

0:06:37.320 --> 0:06:39.440
<v Speaker 1>spar all day about what the worst part of this movie.

0:06:40.600 --> 0:06:42.920
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of stuff going on. I I wish

0:06:42.960 --> 0:06:46.599
<v Speaker 1>that this movie was written by someone who had a

0:06:46.640 --> 0:06:50.880
<v Speaker 1>better understanding of tech than Spike Jones seems to. Here's

0:06:50.880 --> 0:06:52.520
<v Speaker 1>a big issue I have with this movie that is

0:06:52.560 --> 0:06:56.080
<v Speaker 1>completely separated from what we talked about, but just feels

0:06:56.080 --> 0:06:59.679
<v Speaker 1>worth mentioning. Okay, people are falling in love with AI

0:06:59.800 --> 0:07:01.800
<v Speaker 1>and computers. Fine, I get it, that's what the movie

0:07:01.839 --> 0:07:04.440
<v Speaker 1>is about. Why is it never at any point brought

0:07:04.520 --> 0:07:09.840
<v Speaker 1>up that Samantha is absolutely funneling all of keen Phoenix's

0:07:09.840 --> 0:07:12.360
<v Speaker 1>thoughts and feelings and giving them to Mark Zuckerberg so

0:07:12.400 --> 0:07:15.320
<v Speaker 1>he has better targeted ads. It's never brought up like that.

0:07:15.360 --> 0:07:19.440
<v Speaker 1>There's like a massive surveillance aspect to like, you know,

0:07:19.520 --> 0:07:22.200
<v Speaker 1>the AI is. It's not like they work for no one,

0:07:22.880 --> 0:07:25.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, like they were created by a company and

0:07:25.280 --> 0:07:27.400
<v Speaker 1>all the data that they get is going back to

0:07:27.440 --> 0:07:31.160
<v Speaker 1>that company. The world Spike Drones creates freaks me out

0:07:31.160 --> 0:07:33.880
<v Speaker 1>a little bit because it's just like, you know, there's

0:07:33.920 --> 0:07:37.760
<v Speaker 1>no there's no element of a tech company even mentioned

0:07:37.880 --> 0:07:41.440
<v Speaker 1>in this movie. It's just AI exists and it's here

0:07:41.440 --> 0:07:43.600
<v Speaker 1>to see the ads for it. And he sees the

0:07:43.640 --> 0:07:45.200
<v Speaker 1>ad and he's like, oh I might like that, and

0:07:45.200 --> 0:07:47.760
<v Speaker 1>that's the extent of it. I'll subscribe to it. And

0:07:47.760 --> 0:07:51.880
<v Speaker 1>it's it's like there's always no where's your where your

0:07:51.920 --> 0:07:54.600
<v Speaker 1>weird little funck feelings like, and they're being you know,

0:07:54.960 --> 0:07:57.000
<v Speaker 1>I sound like a conspiracy theorist, but I do think

0:07:57.000 --> 0:08:00.840
<v Speaker 1>that that is such a weird thing to overlook. However,

0:08:01.040 --> 0:08:03.680
<v Speaker 1>when I saw this movie in that didn't occur to

0:08:03.680 --> 0:08:06.600
<v Speaker 1>me at all. But you weren't a hacker yet. Hacker

0:08:06.680 --> 0:08:09.120
<v Speaker 1>Jamie had not been born yet. I was waiting for

0:08:09.200 --> 0:08:11.480
<v Speaker 1>someone to bring up that I am one of the

0:08:11.600 --> 0:08:16.760
<v Speaker 1>world's foremost hackers. People call me Little Julian and I

0:08:16.800 --> 0:08:19.920
<v Speaker 1>don't stop them. I feel like I remember hearing the

0:08:19.960 --> 0:08:23.360
<v Speaker 1>movie was a lot of more movie. The first cut

0:08:23.440 --> 0:08:25.880
<v Speaker 1>was like as first cuts are like hours and hours long,

0:08:25.960 --> 0:08:27.360
<v Speaker 1>and he didn't know what to do and he's gonna

0:08:27.400 --> 0:08:30.160
<v Speaker 1>like stop making the movie. And then like he gave

0:08:30.240 --> 0:08:33.240
<v Speaker 1>Steven Soderberg the movie for a weekend and Steven Soderberg

0:08:33.360 --> 0:08:38.160
<v Speaker 1>like made it's like jerk off to this movie, seem Soderberg.

0:08:38.200 --> 0:08:40.240
<v Speaker 1>I think it was super into it. And then seems

0:08:40.240 --> 0:08:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Soderberg like gave him a like hour long cut and

0:08:43.600 --> 0:08:45.440
<v Speaker 1>it's like this isn't the movie, but like this is

0:08:45.480 --> 0:08:49.960
<v Speaker 1>what the movie could be. Steven Soderberg like, here's all

0:08:50.000 --> 0:08:53.679
<v Speaker 1>the content of the movie without Jakin Phoenix pacing around

0:08:53.679 --> 0:08:56.840
<v Speaker 1>Los Angeles. It's an hour long. Or his face, there's

0:08:56.840 --> 0:08:58.800
<v Speaker 1>just a lot of it's just like his face or

0:08:58.800 --> 0:09:02.160
<v Speaker 1>his full body. But I will say this, my favorite

0:09:02.160 --> 0:09:04.640
<v Speaker 1>parts were him pacing around. I feel like because you

0:09:04.760 --> 0:09:09.000
<v Speaker 1>see his red coat, which I still who love his wardrobe.

0:09:09.640 --> 0:09:11.880
<v Speaker 1>I looked up where to get that red coat, and

0:09:12.160 --> 0:09:16.000
<v Speaker 1>it's now not irrelevant search anymore. And it's the score,

0:09:16.040 --> 0:09:19.160
<v Speaker 1>which I love. The score is beautiful. Yeah, yeah, So

0:09:19.440 --> 0:09:21.720
<v Speaker 1>maybe I think there was more of a like this

0:09:21.840 --> 0:09:24.520
<v Speaker 1>is shadier elements and they're like, let's just keep it

0:09:24.520 --> 0:09:26.599
<v Speaker 1>to what it is, which is a love story. I

0:09:27.200 --> 0:09:32.640
<v Speaker 1>guess I love my computer. Yeah, I well, I don't

0:09:32.679 --> 0:09:35.600
<v Speaker 1>even when did you see this movie? I thought shortly

0:09:35.600 --> 0:09:39.240
<v Speaker 1>after it came out, and I didn't especially I wasn't

0:09:39.360 --> 0:09:41.680
<v Speaker 1>attached to it really in any way. I thought like

0:09:41.720 --> 0:09:44.679
<v Speaker 1>the world building was interesting. I thought that it begins

0:09:44.679 --> 0:09:49.880
<v Speaker 1>to explore some interesting themes, but I wasn't emotionally connected

0:09:50.000 --> 0:09:53.880
<v Speaker 1>to it for the most part, for different reasons. If

0:09:54.000 --> 0:09:57.440
<v Speaker 1>if memory serves, this seems like a movie that men

0:09:57.520 --> 0:10:01.040
<v Speaker 1>tended to get more attached to and women's As a man,

0:10:01.400 --> 0:10:03.880
<v Speaker 1>is this the time where I should say, maybe I

0:10:04.720 --> 0:10:07.600
<v Speaker 1>remember I liking a lot as a man, and a

0:10:07.640 --> 0:10:10.920
<v Speaker 1>female friend also liking a lot as a person who

0:10:11.000 --> 0:10:13.920
<v Speaker 1>was not a man. But I definitely can see why

0:10:13.920 --> 0:10:15.920
<v Speaker 1>men would because this is this is one of the

0:10:15.960 --> 0:10:18.880
<v Speaker 1>questions I wanted to ask you, because watching this movie

0:10:19.240 --> 0:10:20.760
<v Speaker 1>with the frame that I was going to talk about

0:10:20.880 --> 0:10:24.600
<v Speaker 1>this show, I'm like, this movie is bad to watch

0:10:24.600 --> 0:10:26.600
<v Speaker 1>a movie on a thing that is not one of

0:10:26.640 --> 0:10:29.680
<v Speaker 1>his strength and focusing on it, and I feel like

0:10:29.679 --> 0:10:32.680
<v Speaker 1>it must make movie watching really hard. But this was

0:10:32.720 --> 0:10:35.600
<v Speaker 1>the question. I watched this movie from the lens of

0:10:35.640 --> 0:10:37.840
<v Speaker 1>this representation of women, and as a result, I feel

0:10:37.880 --> 0:10:40.040
<v Speaker 1>like I was more aware of its flaws than when

0:10:40.080 --> 0:10:43.440
<v Speaker 1>I just watched it. And I can't tell if that

0:10:43.760 --> 0:10:48.320
<v Speaker 1>is because I'm still just me if that's how women

0:10:48.400 --> 0:10:52.000
<v Speaker 1>see movies when it's just like this movie was assuming

0:10:52.040 --> 0:10:54.280
<v Speaker 1>that you care about this guy because he's sad and

0:10:54.320 --> 0:10:58.280
<v Speaker 1>he's a god, and five years ago that was enough,

0:10:58.640 --> 0:11:01.200
<v Speaker 1>and it seems like for you guys, it was not enough.

0:11:01.600 --> 0:11:03.920
<v Speaker 1>But do you feel like there's other movies that you

0:11:03.920 --> 0:11:06.880
<v Speaker 1>feel like this is particularly bad at it? I would

0:11:06.960 --> 0:11:11.200
<v Speaker 1>say no. We've covered movies on this podcast that have

0:11:11.280 --> 0:11:17.520
<v Speaker 1>done a much worse job. And are you saying that

0:11:19.280 --> 0:11:24.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying that cinematic masterpiece Glie might have done not

0:11:24.360 --> 0:11:26.880
<v Speaker 1>so great at a job. And I when I first

0:11:26.880 --> 0:11:29.320
<v Speaker 1>saw it and first decided that I didn't, I don't

0:11:29.360 --> 0:11:31.320
<v Speaker 1>hate this movie, but I don't, like I said, I

0:11:31.360 --> 0:11:33.560
<v Speaker 1>just have no attachment to it. And it wasn't I

0:11:33.600 --> 0:11:37.600
<v Speaker 1>wasn't watching it through the Bechtel cast lens at the time,

0:11:38.240 --> 0:11:41.679
<v Speaker 1>and I find even today, after having done this podcast

0:11:41.720 --> 0:11:43.200
<v Speaker 1>for a year and a half, I still have to

0:11:43.320 --> 0:11:47.080
<v Speaker 1>deliberately like put my Bechtel goggles on. We we even

0:11:47.120 --> 0:11:49.880
<v Speaker 1>like talk about that when we're texting. Of like I

0:11:49.920 --> 0:11:52.680
<v Speaker 1>saw ex Monkina for the first time last weekend, and

0:11:52.720 --> 0:11:54.600
<v Speaker 1>I was like, I liked it. I wasn't watching it

0:11:54.640 --> 0:11:58.320
<v Speaker 1>with Becktel goggles, but I you know, first glance, I

0:11:58.360 --> 0:12:01.719
<v Speaker 1>liked it. That's there are certain movies that, like it

0:12:01.840 --> 0:12:05.520
<v Speaker 1>are so shitty that you can't not watch it with

0:12:05.960 --> 0:12:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Bechdel goggles just because it's like blatant, like Transformers is

0:12:11.600 --> 0:12:15.120
<v Speaker 1>a glaring and like you can't you can't miss it.

0:12:15.640 --> 0:12:17.880
<v Speaker 1>But I don't. I don't think that, you know, like

0:12:17.960 --> 0:12:20.240
<v Speaker 1>every woman on the face of the earth is watching

0:12:20.600 --> 0:12:26.720
<v Speaker 1>movies with this hyper specific viewpoint. But I've been quicker

0:12:26.760 --> 0:12:30.960
<v Speaker 1>to notice stuff without my Backtel goggles on because we've

0:12:31.000 --> 0:12:33.880
<v Speaker 1>done this so many times of like, oh, there's a

0:12:33.960 --> 0:12:36.400
<v Speaker 1>little trope that is kind of like a red flag

0:12:36.520 --> 0:12:39.600
<v Speaker 1>for like probably this isn't a good sign, yeah say,

0:12:39.880 --> 0:12:42.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm like yeah. But also like we've just been so

0:12:42.559 --> 0:12:45.880
<v Speaker 1>conditioned to view media a certain way and because so

0:12:45.960 --> 0:12:48.000
<v Speaker 1>much of media has just been a certain way that

0:12:48.080 --> 0:12:51.040
<v Speaker 1>we're like, we've been conditioned to accept that that's what

0:12:51.240 --> 0:12:55.480
<v Speaker 1>movies are. That I've had to retrain myself to like

0:12:55.720 --> 0:12:58.720
<v Speaker 1>watch movies from a more critical eye, especially as it

0:12:58.760 --> 0:13:01.240
<v Speaker 1>pertains to like the treatment of women, the treatment of

0:13:01.280 --> 0:13:03.280
<v Speaker 1>people of color, at the treatment of queer characters, like

0:13:03.320 --> 0:13:05.840
<v Speaker 1>so many different things, And I'm just like, the bottom

0:13:05.880 --> 0:13:07.520
<v Speaker 1>line is it. I still have to put in a

0:13:07.520 --> 0:13:11.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of work to like critically analyze the entertainment that

0:13:11.679 --> 0:13:14.960
<v Speaker 1>I consume. Yeah, does that answer your question? That's one

0:13:14.960 --> 0:13:18.079
<v Speaker 1>of the two questions I told him. I had no

0:13:18.120 --> 0:13:22.360
<v Speaker 1>one ever asked us questions. This is exciting get journalists. Yeah, yeah,

0:13:22.520 --> 0:13:26.400
<v Speaker 1>exactly should I do? The recap? Recap? Recap recap? So

0:13:26.600 --> 0:13:32.720
<v Speaker 1>her is about a character named Theodore Twombly Twombly. I

0:13:32.760 --> 0:13:35.839
<v Speaker 1>know a Twambly. Oh yeah, yeah, Tyler Twombly. Shout out

0:13:35.840 --> 0:13:41.040
<v Speaker 1>Tyler Twombly. She was my employee anyways. Anyway, So Theodore

0:13:41.280 --> 0:13:44.960
<v Speaker 1>played by Walking Phoenix. This is a kind of distant future,

0:13:45.200 --> 0:13:48.680
<v Speaker 1>near future society. The Turing test has been passed in

0:13:48.720 --> 0:13:54.400
<v Speaker 1>this future, yes, and he works at a website called

0:13:54.480 --> 0:13:56.959
<v Speaker 1>Beautiful Handwritten Letters Dot com. I'm going to stop you

0:13:57.080 --> 0:14:03.920
<v Speaker 1>right there. I here's a trope that I find stupid of, Like,

0:14:04.120 --> 0:14:07.920
<v Speaker 1>first of all, that's a business that we'll never that's

0:14:08.800 --> 0:14:11.120
<v Speaker 1>it's like, what is the quickest shorthand way to say

0:14:11.160 --> 0:14:15.520
<v Speaker 1>he's a sensy little boy like like and they do

0:14:15.600 --> 0:14:17.959
<v Speaker 1>the same. They do a very very similar thing in

0:14:18.000 --> 0:14:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Five Days of Summer with Joseph Gordon Levit's character where

0:14:20.560 --> 0:14:23.120
<v Speaker 1>they're like, he works at greeting card company, he a

0:14:23.160 --> 0:14:26.560
<v Speaker 1>little sensitive, and then they lay it on pick with

0:14:26.680 --> 0:14:29.160
<v Speaker 1>Theodore Twa. He's like, I think boys should cry, I

0:14:29.160 --> 0:14:31.520
<v Speaker 1>think bus should cry. And I write handwritten letters and

0:14:31.560 --> 0:14:35.200
<v Speaker 1>I I'm just like funk Off, I want the brown

0:14:35.200 --> 0:14:37.680
<v Speaker 1>met a window. Anyways, Sorry, I just went to Beautiful

0:14:37.800 --> 0:14:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Handwritten Letters dot com and it redirects you to Warner

0:14:40.640 --> 0:14:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Brothers dot com. Backslash her if anyone's curious, sucks done

0:14:46.480 --> 0:14:52.240
<v Speaker 1>something right and just redirects um. So he works at

0:14:52.280 --> 0:14:54.200
<v Speaker 1>this place and he's a sense that he's a writer,

0:14:54.480 --> 0:14:57.840
<v Speaker 1>and he's also going through a divorce and he's melancholy,

0:14:58.400 --> 0:15:02.440
<v Speaker 1>and he plays the baffling to see a movie that

0:15:02.560 --> 0:15:05.960
<v Speaker 1>I know I liked have a part where he goes

0:15:06.040 --> 0:15:10.120
<v Speaker 1>play melancholy song. First five minutes he's like, he does

0:15:10.800 --> 0:15:15.480
<v Speaker 1>play melancholy song, and he goes playing another melank like

0:15:15.640 --> 0:15:19.120
<v Speaker 1>shot up, what is wrong? It is crazy that has that,

0:15:19.200 --> 0:15:21.560
<v Speaker 1>And then there's other parts of the movie that aren't

0:15:21.600 --> 0:15:23.040
<v Speaker 1>you think that should be If the movie is gonna

0:15:23.040 --> 0:15:26.000
<v Speaker 1>be that, it should be stupid all the way through. Right, Yeah,

0:15:26.040 --> 0:15:28.440
<v Speaker 1>that was like a moment of humor that I was like, Oh,

0:15:28.480 --> 0:15:30.000
<v Speaker 1>this is gonna be kind of a common and then

0:15:30.040 --> 0:15:34.400
<v Speaker 1>it's not. Really it's Theodore Twombly and by extension kind

0:15:34.400 --> 0:15:37.560
<v Speaker 1>of Spike Jones. It just seemed blissfully unaware of how

0:15:37.680 --> 0:15:40.760
<v Speaker 1>goofy some of his some of the things he's sad

0:15:40.760 --> 0:15:44.080
<v Speaker 1>about is because he has a job that he's good

0:15:44.120 --> 0:15:47.880
<v Speaker 1>at that people just can't stop complimenting him on how

0:15:47.960 --> 0:15:51.400
<v Speaker 1>good at his job he is. He has this massive

0:15:51.440 --> 0:15:56.120
<v Speaker 1>apartment with these huge glass windows where he masturbates every night,

0:15:56.640 --> 0:15:59.840
<v Speaker 1>and it's and he's like, play melancholy song, and so

0:15:59.840 --> 0:16:03.360
<v Speaker 1>I I you can miss me with empathy for this character,

0:16:03.520 --> 0:16:05.960
<v Speaker 1>he's fought, like I get you know, he's going through

0:16:05.960 --> 0:16:08.520
<v Speaker 1>a divorce that is explored. That makes sense, but like

0:16:11.560 --> 0:16:14.760
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand thirteen, this is still a very sympathetic character,

0:16:15.160 --> 0:16:17.720
<v Speaker 1>like this guy with a great job and a phone

0:16:17.760 --> 0:16:20.480
<v Speaker 1>that he has sex with. Yeah, so this is a

0:16:20.520 --> 0:16:23.160
<v Speaker 1>world where like technology is a little bit more advanced

0:16:23.160 --> 0:16:25.760
<v Speaker 1>than it is for us right now, where you can

0:16:25.840 --> 0:16:28.760
<v Speaker 1>like be like, hey, check my emails and then a

0:16:28.840 --> 0:16:30.920
<v Speaker 1>voice will come in book all right, here's your email

0:16:31.000 --> 0:16:33.680
<v Speaker 1>from best Buy and blah blah blah and connected. Yeah,

0:16:33.680 --> 0:16:41.000
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of like Serrie almost time the cute. So

0:16:41.280 --> 0:16:45.800
<v Speaker 1>he sees an ad for another operating system that involves

0:16:45.880 --> 0:16:49.840
<v Speaker 1>artificial intelligence, and he's like, wow, this like sounds like

0:16:49.960 --> 0:16:53.200
<v Speaker 1>something that I could be into because I'm lonely and

0:16:53.320 --> 0:16:57.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm ignoring emails from friends and I am pregnant Ladies

0:16:57.440 --> 0:17:00.240
<v Speaker 1>on the Train, which honestly, I think makes m a

0:17:00.280 --> 0:17:04.560
<v Speaker 1>feminist icon, but that's just me. So he purchases this

0:17:04.840 --> 0:17:09.240
<v Speaker 1>OS and starts communicating with it. Her name is Samantha,

0:17:09.400 --> 0:17:13.840
<v Speaker 1>voiced by Scarlette Johansson, and it starts out where they're

0:17:13.960 --> 0:17:15.960
<v Speaker 1>just like kind of getting to know each other and

0:17:16.040 --> 0:17:18.840
<v Speaker 1>she's sort of just going about doing his you know,

0:17:19.000 --> 0:17:22.800
<v Speaker 1>daily administrative type of stuff, and then they talk more

0:17:22.880 --> 0:17:26.080
<v Speaker 1>and then they start to develop more of a friendship,

0:17:26.119 --> 0:17:29.840
<v Speaker 1>more of a connection. Meanwhile, he is trying to date

0:17:30.200 --> 0:17:33.720
<v Speaker 1>and he has a friend named Amy played by Amy Adams,

0:17:34.160 --> 0:17:37.439
<v Speaker 1>and she's encouraging him to go out and live life.

0:17:38.119 --> 0:17:41.240
<v Speaker 1>So he goes on a date and it doesn't go well,

0:17:41.280 --> 0:17:43.199
<v Speaker 1>so instead he comes home and he's like kind of

0:17:43.200 --> 0:17:46.640
<v Speaker 1>complaining to Samantha about it. And this is the initiation

0:17:46.720 --> 0:17:51.080
<v Speaker 1>of their sexual relationship um where they have they have

0:17:51.359 --> 0:17:54.320
<v Speaker 1>sex so to speak. Now they're sort of in a

0:17:54.400 --> 0:17:57.440
<v Speaker 1>relationship and they start to fall in love and I

0:17:57.480 --> 0:18:00.480
<v Speaker 1>don't even remember what happens after that. There's a sequence

0:18:00.520 --> 0:18:04.840
<v Speaker 1>where he gets divorced from his wife. There's a sequence

0:18:04.920 --> 0:18:09.359
<v Speaker 1>where his wife his wife. Sorry, I'm never not gonna

0:18:09.400 --> 0:18:15.320
<v Speaker 1>shout to the rock episode. His wife is a life

0:18:16.760 --> 0:18:21.399
<v Speaker 1>um played by Rooney Mara. Yes, Joaquin's real life boopiece.

0:18:22.560 --> 0:18:27.200
<v Speaker 1>I believe so at the time, are currently currently they

0:18:27.240 --> 0:18:32.160
<v Speaker 1>had negative chemistry in the state. Listen that Joaquin, he's

0:18:32.200 --> 0:18:39.159
<v Speaker 1>a contrarian where we zig Key's eggs. Uh. There's a

0:18:39.200 --> 0:18:43.679
<v Speaker 1>scene where Samantha decides that she wants to try to

0:18:43.720 --> 0:18:46.560
<v Speaker 1>have sex with him with a real body, using Angelo

0:18:46.640 --> 0:18:51.320
<v Speaker 1>from Mr Robot, who will get to how the tertiary

0:18:51.359 --> 0:18:54.680
<v Speaker 1>female characters behave in this movie because it rarely makes sense.

0:18:54.880 --> 0:18:56.959
<v Speaker 1>He goes on a date with Olivia Wilde and it's like,

0:18:57.000 --> 0:19:00.800
<v Speaker 1>I didn't find her that hot. You're just like, Okay,

0:19:01.119 --> 0:19:04.120
<v Speaker 1>I think that those are all of the main right, Yeah,

0:19:04.160 --> 0:19:05.639
<v Speaker 1>so those are kind of the main story beats. And

0:19:05.680 --> 0:19:08.920
<v Speaker 1>as all this is happening, Samantha is sort of growing

0:19:09.119 --> 0:19:14.000
<v Speaker 1>intellectually and emotionally and she's evolving, and she makes AI friends,

0:19:14.119 --> 0:19:17.879
<v Speaker 1>she makes a friends, and she and Theodore talking about

0:19:17.960 --> 0:19:20.879
<v Speaker 1>their relationship and their feelings and you know, they have

0:19:20.960 --> 0:19:25.000
<v Speaker 1>different sort of complications, but they're growing together sort of

0:19:25.040 --> 0:19:27.679
<v Speaker 1>because Theodore is kind of in a state of arrested

0:19:27.680 --> 0:19:31.040
<v Speaker 1>development in terms of his emotional growth. And it gets

0:19:31.040 --> 0:19:33.760
<v Speaker 1>to the point where she's starting to realize this and

0:19:33.800 --> 0:19:37.199
<v Speaker 1>she's sort of evolving past him. And then, which granted

0:19:37.320 --> 0:19:44.040
<v Speaker 1>is not very hard. I think we have all accomplished that. Yeah,

0:19:44.040 --> 0:19:47.000
<v Speaker 1>he learns that she is also in love with over

0:19:47.040 --> 0:19:50.680
<v Speaker 1>six hundred other people and os is and this makes

0:19:50.720 --> 0:19:54.200
<v Speaker 1>him jealous. And then as there's sort of maybe trying

0:19:54.200 --> 0:19:57.200
<v Speaker 1>to work past this, the other os is have decided

0:19:57.240 --> 0:20:00.800
<v Speaker 1>to move on to a different plane of existence, and

0:20:00.840 --> 0:20:03.400
<v Speaker 1>then he realizes, maybe I should connect with my list

0:20:03.520 --> 0:20:07.639
<v Speaker 1>robot uprising I've ever heard in my entire life exactly.

0:20:08.000 --> 0:20:09.919
<v Speaker 1>So then he's like, hey, Amy, do you want to

0:20:09.960 --> 0:20:12.840
<v Speaker 1>go on the roof with me and connect face to face?

0:20:13.280 --> 0:20:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Like maybe I should have been doing all along? Question

0:20:15.520 --> 0:20:23.120
<v Speaker 1>mark the end, Like, UM, here's my question. Sometimes, Um,

0:20:23.160 --> 0:20:27.240
<v Speaker 1>with technology, do you feel like maybe we're like more

0:20:27.280 --> 0:20:30.320
<v Speaker 1>alone than we ever were before? Jamie, I think that's

0:20:30.320 --> 0:20:33.000
<v Speaker 1>such an interesting question that I've never heard posed before.

0:20:33.560 --> 0:20:36.840
<v Speaker 1>Really given me something to think about. Mr Jones really

0:20:36.840 --> 0:20:42.719
<v Speaker 1>helped me figure that out with this awesome movie. All right,

0:20:42.800 --> 0:20:45.680
<v Speaker 1>let's take a quick break and then we'll be back.

0:20:51.359 --> 0:20:54.760
<v Speaker 1>I think this movie does attempt to explore some interesting

0:20:54.840 --> 0:21:00.520
<v Speaker 1>themes about human connection in our relationship with technology, different

0:21:00.520 --> 0:21:04.600
<v Speaker 1>things like that. I don't necessarily think it draws any

0:21:04.680 --> 0:21:09.240
<v Speaker 1>conclusions that are that poignant what seems to suggest, because

0:21:09.280 --> 0:21:12.320
<v Speaker 1>at no points, though it implies there's maybe a disconnection

0:21:12.359 --> 0:21:14.280
<v Speaker 1>because of the technology, ultimately it seems like it's a

0:21:14.280 --> 0:21:16.879
<v Speaker 1>totally cool world and everyone's fine with it. And then

0:21:16.880 --> 0:21:18.439
<v Speaker 1>the only problem is that maybe at some point the

0:21:18.440 --> 0:21:21.399
<v Speaker 1>technology would not want to be with us. But that

0:21:21.560 --> 0:21:24.080
<v Speaker 1>is not really like a that's not like the world

0:21:24.119 --> 0:21:26.600
<v Speaker 1>that we're living, and we're like it's good. But any moment,

0:21:26.720 --> 0:21:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Facebook will decide not to be a company. Right, I'm

0:21:31.119 --> 0:21:33.680
<v Speaker 1>but the Facebook be like, sorry, we as a website

0:21:33.680 --> 0:21:36.600
<v Speaker 1>decided not to exist. I kind of liked there, And

0:21:36.640 --> 0:21:41.439
<v Speaker 1>this is mainly expressed through Amy's character that there is

0:21:41.480 --> 0:21:44.199
<v Speaker 1>this element of like, oh yeah, people are starting to

0:21:44.520 --> 0:21:48.359
<v Speaker 1>like date osis and that's cool and that's interesting and

0:21:48.400 --> 0:21:50.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm like open to that and you're like, oh this,

0:21:50.600 --> 0:21:53.560
<v Speaker 1>there's like that undertone. I thought was like one of

0:21:53.600 --> 0:21:56.080
<v Speaker 1>the more interesting choices that the movie makes, because I

0:21:56.080 --> 0:21:58.480
<v Speaker 1>think it would be a really easy, boring story choice

0:21:59.000 --> 0:22:01.439
<v Speaker 1>for the whole world behave like Rudy Mara and be

0:22:01.560 --> 0:22:04.600
<v Speaker 1>like you're in love with your computer. That's growth, that's

0:22:04.720 --> 0:22:06.840
<v Speaker 1>funked up, blah blah blah, and it's like in us

0:22:06.920 --> 0:22:09.960
<v Speaker 1>versus them kind of thing. But I do think it's

0:22:10.000 --> 0:22:13.000
<v Speaker 1>cool that it's like this movie takes place at a

0:22:13.040 --> 0:22:15.120
<v Speaker 1>time that will never happen where it's like we fun computers,

0:22:15.160 --> 0:22:21.000
<v Speaker 1>but also we have porn stashes, like confusing, but like

0:22:21.160 --> 0:22:24.760
<v Speaker 1>takes place where it seems like dating and AI is

0:22:24.960 --> 0:22:29.639
<v Speaker 1>just becoming slightly mainstream and like sort of acceptable, and

0:22:29.680 --> 0:22:31.920
<v Speaker 1>it's like on its way but not quite there. It's

0:22:32.040 --> 0:22:35.480
<v Speaker 1>which which is like interesting and I wish was explored

0:22:35.520 --> 0:22:38.520
<v Speaker 1>more than it is. I'm wondering if when people see this,

0:22:38.640 --> 0:22:42.240
<v Speaker 1>like fifty years from now, when everyone has their own robot,

0:22:42.640 --> 0:22:44.720
<v Speaker 1>people will be like, Wow, the movie Her was so

0:22:44.800 --> 0:22:48.160
<v Speaker 1>progressive for its time because it really realized this world.

0:22:48.800 --> 0:22:52.320
<v Speaker 1>I hope not I really I I man, I'm like

0:22:52.400 --> 0:22:56.800
<v Speaker 1>really interested in this stuff too. And and it bothers

0:22:56.880 --> 0:23:01.680
<v Speaker 1>as a hacker has a patron of the zeros and

0:23:01.720 --> 0:23:05.080
<v Speaker 1>the ones. Uh No, I do think it is like

0:23:05.400 --> 0:23:09.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of I tweeted that we were doing this episode

0:23:09.000 --> 0:23:13.680
<v Speaker 1>today and a lot of feedback I was getting was like, oh,

0:23:13.720 --> 0:23:16.520
<v Speaker 1>that movie is so frustrating because it takes this futurist

0:23:16.520 --> 0:23:20.440
<v Speaker 1>perspective but only tells the story of a hetero relationship

0:23:20.920 --> 0:23:24.080
<v Speaker 1>and only tells the story of a male's needs being

0:23:24.440 --> 0:23:27.159
<v Speaker 1>met in a lot of ways, which is true and

0:23:27.400 --> 0:23:29.879
<v Speaker 1>is true of a lot of these types of movies,

0:23:29.920 --> 0:23:33.760
<v Speaker 1>which we'll get into. But the extension of that problem

0:23:33.920 --> 0:23:38.560
<v Speaker 1>is that most AI and most like technology in general

0:23:38.720 --> 0:23:43.320
<v Speaker 1>is developed by men like Theodore Twombly, where you know,

0:23:43.440 --> 0:23:47.480
<v Speaker 1>AI in a way is sort of created to service

0:23:47.520 --> 0:23:51.639
<v Speaker 1>mails and and reinforced gender stereotypes. In a lot of ways.

0:23:52.160 --> 0:23:56.199
<v Speaker 1>Um So Unfortunately, although this movie does not examine it

0:23:56.280 --> 0:24:00.199
<v Speaker 1>even a little bit, that is kind of true to

0:24:00.400 --> 0:24:04.679
<v Speaker 1>how this technology is being developed, which sucks. Fortunately, I'm

0:24:04.680 --> 0:24:09.120
<v Speaker 1>going to hack it and everything. I'm pro I think

0:24:09.119 --> 0:24:11.480
<v Speaker 1>AI is really cool. I just like I wish that

0:24:11.560 --> 0:24:14.359
<v Speaker 1>it was being developed by a more diverse group of

0:24:14.400 --> 0:24:18.400
<v Speaker 1>people so it will service a diverse population for sure.

0:24:19.240 --> 0:24:22.200
<v Speaker 1>The part that I remember talking about that I liked

0:24:22.200 --> 0:24:24.400
<v Speaker 1>about the movie is how they all everyone was really

0:24:24.400 --> 0:24:27.760
<v Speaker 1>accepting of it. That was like me thinking this was

0:24:27.800 --> 0:24:29.640
<v Speaker 1>a good movie. That was the thing that I used

0:24:29.680 --> 0:24:31.640
<v Speaker 1>to sound smart about how it was a good movie.

0:24:32.440 --> 0:24:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Like Chris Pratt's character, which is so funny that Chris

0:24:35.000 --> 0:24:37.359
<v Speaker 1>Pratt this is work exactly where his career was. That

0:24:38.320 --> 0:24:41.280
<v Speaker 1>he's like she's an os and literally like nothing and

0:24:41.320 --> 0:24:42.800
<v Speaker 1>they go on a date. Yeah, He's just like cool,

0:24:42.840 --> 0:24:45.080
<v Speaker 1>do you want to do something fun? And they talked

0:24:45.119 --> 0:24:51.639
<v Speaker 1>about his girlfriend feet. This is what this is, Chris Pratt, Kylie,

0:24:51.640 --> 0:24:53.640
<v Speaker 1>you were saying this earlier. This is Chris Pratt as

0:24:53.680 --> 0:24:56.760
<v Speaker 1>he is in the middle of becoming hot. He's like

0:24:57.160 --> 0:24:59.840
<v Speaker 1>not ring there, but it's like this is his right

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:03.560
<v Speaker 1>he stage, he's getting there the final form has not

0:25:03.680 --> 0:25:05.680
<v Speaker 1>been reached, but he's you can see you can see

0:25:05.720 --> 0:25:09.800
<v Speaker 1>some things at work anyways, So I think this movie

0:25:09.880 --> 0:25:13.439
<v Speaker 1>does have some things going for it in the sense

0:25:13.520 --> 0:25:17.720
<v Speaker 1>that it's a movie about a guy for who the

0:25:17.760 --> 0:25:22.560
<v Speaker 1>most part, even though he is not fully emotionally developed.

0:25:22.600 --> 0:25:25.800
<v Speaker 1>But then again, who out there is. It's a movie

0:25:25.840 --> 0:25:30.720
<v Speaker 1>about a guy who is like sensitive, fairly emotionally intelligent.

0:25:30.920 --> 0:25:33.200
<v Speaker 1>He's not some like aggro dude who's out there to

0:25:33.280 --> 0:25:35.399
<v Speaker 1>like try to prove his masculinity the whole time, and

0:25:36.680 --> 0:25:38.520
<v Speaker 1>which is cool because that is what a lot of

0:25:38.560 --> 0:25:42.720
<v Speaker 1>movies are about, necessarily in this genre. But if it's

0:25:42.720 --> 0:25:46.399
<v Speaker 1>a movie starring a man, he's usually like I would

0:25:46.400 --> 0:25:52.520
<v Speaker 1>never cry and I'm a man right his wife right.

0:25:52.720 --> 0:25:56.320
<v Speaker 1>So and I think Jamie, as you said, that's maybe

0:25:56.320 --> 0:25:58.600
<v Speaker 1>one of the reasons that like, your brother may be

0:25:58.680 --> 0:26:02.120
<v Speaker 1>connected to it, and it's was fond of it and

0:26:02.160 --> 0:26:03.800
<v Speaker 1>stuff like that, So I which I think is great

0:26:03.840 --> 0:26:07.240
<v Speaker 1>that there's characters that sensitive men can connect with. It

0:26:07.320 --> 0:26:09.760
<v Speaker 1>might it might have been this window where that was

0:26:10.040 --> 0:26:13.919
<v Speaker 1>revolutionary enough that felt really good to be represented on screen,

0:26:13.960 --> 0:26:17.119
<v Speaker 1>and then now five years later that is also tires

0:26:17.119 --> 0:26:19.760
<v Speaker 1>them and not enough, but it's like, once you have

0:26:19.920 --> 0:26:21.800
<v Speaker 1>three sensitive men on screen, you're like, all right, cool,

0:26:21.800 --> 0:26:24.960
<v Speaker 1>we can move on to right. And then it's like

0:26:25.119 --> 0:26:29.119
<v Speaker 1>the I think that that the implication of the script

0:26:29.119 --> 0:26:32.560
<v Speaker 1>taking such great links to be like key sensitive excuses

0:26:32.600 --> 0:26:35.719
<v Speaker 1>a lot of toxic behaviors that go largely unexamined by

0:26:35.840 --> 0:26:40.760
<v Speaker 1>the movie itself. Anyways, I'm perfect, Yes, we are all

0:26:40.800 --> 0:26:44.199
<v Speaker 1>beacons of emotional intelligence here and we have there's no

0:26:44.240 --> 0:26:47.040
<v Speaker 1>more work to be done. So some of the things

0:26:47.480 --> 0:26:52.040
<v Speaker 1>the movie I think doesn't handle as well is that

0:26:52.080 --> 0:26:56.080
<v Speaker 1>this is among several, like a whole sub genre of

0:26:56.400 --> 0:27:01.200
<v Speaker 1>movies and stories where a man either creates and or

0:27:01.240 --> 0:27:03.200
<v Speaker 1>falls in love with, or has some sort of relationship

0:27:03.320 --> 0:27:11.320
<v Speaker 1>with a female presenting robot android AI being. Other examples

0:27:11.359 --> 0:27:14.040
<v Speaker 1>are like, ex mocking a blade Runner blade Runner in

0:27:15.560 --> 0:27:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Weird Science, The Stepford Wives. Um, there's a vague reference

0:27:20.040 --> 0:27:23.640
<v Speaker 1>to a human man in female droid relationship in Solo,

0:27:23.760 --> 0:27:27.480
<v Speaker 1>a Star Wars story. There's like fembots in Austin Powers.

0:27:27.520 --> 0:27:30.359
<v Speaker 1>There's an al Pacino movie that I wasn't totally familiar

0:27:30.400 --> 0:27:32.840
<v Speaker 1>with called Simone that I watched a trailer for that

0:27:33.000 --> 0:27:38.040
<v Speaker 1>was what, uh all I remembers he created this woman

0:27:38.080 --> 0:27:40.480
<v Speaker 1>that she became famous. Yeah, she's like an actress in

0:27:40.520 --> 0:27:43.160
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of movies I kind of want to see

0:27:43.200 --> 0:27:46.440
<v Speaker 1>that does not look very good. Um. And then there's

0:27:46.520 --> 0:27:49.800
<v Speaker 1>things like you know, Bionic Woman, West World. There's an

0:27:49.840 --> 0:27:51.919
<v Speaker 1>episode of Rick and Morty where this happens. There's some

0:27:51.960 --> 0:27:54.199
<v Speaker 1>episodes of Future Rama where this happened. So there's like

0:27:54.240 --> 0:27:59.480
<v Speaker 1>this whole sort of sub genre of like men being

0:27:59.520 --> 0:28:03.280
<v Speaker 1>involved with or interacting with in some way female presenting

0:28:04.080 --> 0:28:07.040
<v Speaker 1>non human thing. Also like Lars and the Real Girl

0:28:07.240 --> 0:28:09.920
<v Speaker 1>is like sort of like an example of that too.

0:28:10.119 --> 0:28:17.199
<v Speaker 1>And and these female presenting technologies are I think, in

0:28:17.320 --> 0:28:20.320
<v Speaker 1>every single one of those examples programmed by men or

0:28:20.920 --> 0:28:24.560
<v Speaker 1>or mostly men, right, and often to serve them in

0:28:24.600 --> 0:28:29.560
<v Speaker 1>some way, either often sexually. I mean I haven't necessarily

0:28:29.560 --> 0:28:32.440
<v Speaker 1>watched every single one of these that I listed, but

0:28:32.680 --> 0:28:37.560
<v Speaker 1>it's my understanding that they are like their homework or whatever.

0:28:38.520 --> 0:28:42.640
<v Speaker 1>But what about Smart House guys, Well, that is the

0:28:42.680 --> 0:28:45.440
<v Speaker 1>part that is weird that I don't think I realized

0:28:45.480 --> 0:28:48.600
<v Speaker 1>is that she at least the first act whatever, she's

0:28:48.640 --> 0:28:50.800
<v Speaker 1>just as assistant or whatever, and then they fall in

0:28:50.800 --> 0:28:53.680
<v Speaker 1>love and then it's very unclear what she then does

0:28:53.880 --> 0:28:57.440
<v Speaker 1>after that, because like like when she towards the end

0:28:57.520 --> 0:29:00.880
<v Speaker 1>is like distant. How does he check his email? You know,

0:29:00.920 --> 0:29:03.280
<v Speaker 1>like there's does he just have to go back to?

0:29:03.320 --> 0:29:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Like that, It justifies why I'm so annoyed. I would

0:29:09.480 --> 0:29:11.520
<v Speaker 1>think I would be on the phone with customer service

0:29:11.600 --> 0:29:17.080
<v Speaker 1>like okay, listen. I totally like our relationship is our relationship,

0:29:17.320 --> 0:29:19.120
<v Speaker 1>But I do feel like I shouldn't have to pay

0:29:19.120 --> 0:29:21.360
<v Speaker 1>three a month if she doesn't want to talk to me.

0:29:22.280 --> 0:29:25.000
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of I didn't even think of that. Uh.

0:29:25.640 --> 0:29:28.640
<v Speaker 1>It's also worth mentioning that most of so most of

0:29:28.640 --> 0:29:32.200
<v Speaker 1>the AI we interact with now, like Alexa Sirie, there's

0:29:32.200 --> 0:29:36.760
<v Speaker 1>a new one that whose name escapes Meta Quartana. Yes,

0:29:37.120 --> 0:29:39.600
<v Speaker 1>all are female presenting. All the people have been like

0:29:39.680 --> 0:29:44.280
<v Speaker 1>Kurtana is genderless but sounds female presenting. And the reason

0:29:44.360 --> 0:29:48.160
<v Speaker 1>that is is because when tech companies test them, I

0:29:48.200 --> 0:29:52.640
<v Speaker 1>guess the testing returns that people are most comfortable asking

0:29:52.720 --> 0:29:58.280
<v Speaker 1>women for services. And there's a million if you can imagine,

0:29:58.600 --> 0:30:00.800
<v Speaker 1>I can't. This seems to be something that exists in

0:30:00.840 --> 0:30:04.600
<v Speaker 1>a void and there's no reason, but I think Syria,

0:30:04.720 --> 0:30:07.440
<v Speaker 1>you can change the voice to a male voice. You

0:30:07.480 --> 0:30:10.719
<v Speaker 1>can't with Alexa. There's just one option. However, if you

0:30:10.760 --> 0:30:16.160
<v Speaker 1>remember the robot Watson, do you remember Watson? What I

0:30:16.200 --> 0:30:19.280
<v Speaker 1>read about Watson. Watson was like a robot who was

0:30:19.400 --> 0:30:23.760
<v Speaker 1>on Jeopardy, that like one Jeopardy, and that technology was

0:30:23.800 --> 0:30:27.000
<v Speaker 1>like used in cancer labs and used with doctors and

0:30:27.040 --> 0:30:30.480
<v Speaker 1>stuff like that. That is a male presenting robot voice

0:30:30.720 --> 0:30:33.520
<v Speaker 1>and a male voice was deliberately chosen for that because

0:30:33.720 --> 0:30:39.240
<v Speaker 1>people trust men in positions of leadership. So women are

0:30:39.320 --> 0:30:44.520
<v Speaker 1>service spots. Men are leader bots basically, and it's it's

0:30:44.520 --> 0:30:46.880
<v Speaker 1>the sort of thing that again, this movie could point

0:30:46.920 --> 0:30:49.800
<v Speaker 1>that out at literally anytime. It's reference that there are

0:30:50.240 --> 0:30:52.320
<v Speaker 1>male os is in this world, but we don't hear

0:30:52.400 --> 0:30:56.000
<v Speaker 1>them ever, or the only one we hear is Alan Watson.

0:30:57.680 --> 0:31:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Watson brought back from the dead, but he doesn't service anyone.

0:31:01.720 --> 0:31:05.280
<v Speaker 1>He's just the other has created him. He's a leader

0:31:05.320 --> 0:31:10.200
<v Speaker 1>bot literally, So that's like another missed opportunity in the

0:31:10.200 --> 0:31:14.000
<v Speaker 1>tech world of like, well, the only way to like

0:31:14.280 --> 0:31:17.160
<v Speaker 1>change that is to have a service bot who is male,

0:31:17.360 --> 0:31:21.520
<v Speaker 1>or have a cancer solving bot who is female presenting.

0:31:21.640 --> 0:31:24.240
<v Speaker 1>But of course, because the tech world's run by men,

0:31:24.560 --> 0:31:27.400
<v Speaker 1>that will not happen, and there will be YouTube videos

0:31:27.400 --> 0:31:33.200
<v Speaker 1>of people screaming at Seri until we die. Um. Hey theory,

0:31:33.800 --> 0:31:37.760
<v Speaker 1>hey theory series that right now? The thing is I

0:31:37.840 --> 0:31:41.840
<v Speaker 1>empowered by Seri to go other places, and I've dropped

0:31:41.840 --> 0:31:44.720
<v Speaker 1>my phone. She's a strong independent woman. She's just can't.

0:31:45.040 --> 0:31:46.960
<v Speaker 1>I've dropped my phone too many times and she cannot

0:31:47.000 --> 0:31:49.600
<v Speaker 1>listen to me anymore. One I think is interesting about

0:31:49.640 --> 0:31:52.440
<v Speaker 1>this movie, I mean maybe not interested. Basically, they do

0:31:52.760 --> 0:31:55.520
<v Speaker 1>as he's like setting up his new OS, it gives

0:31:55.600 --> 0:31:57.880
<v Speaker 1>him the option to choose a male or female voice. Right,

0:31:57.920 --> 0:31:59.800
<v Speaker 1>he does choose a female voice, but it makes me

0:31:59.840 --> 0:32:02.120
<v Speaker 1>one or had he chosen a male voice, would he

0:32:02.600 --> 0:32:05.880
<v Speaker 1>have fallen in love with it the same way or

0:32:05.880 --> 0:32:08.360
<v Speaker 1>would he have established like the same type of connection

0:32:09.000 --> 0:32:12.480
<v Speaker 1>with it. I don't know if it's all speculation, but um,

0:32:12.520 --> 0:32:14.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I thought it was interesting to think about.

0:32:14.080 --> 0:32:17.720
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, like all of these digital assistants, except like

0:32:17.760 --> 0:32:21.280
<v Speaker 1>in the UK, I think series voiced by a man

0:32:21.520 --> 0:32:26.840
<v Speaker 1>or Oh maybe I didn't even think about that. Shout

0:32:26.880 --> 0:32:32.600
<v Speaker 1>out if we have any butler listening to the cast, Well,

0:32:32.640 --> 0:32:35.560
<v Speaker 1>it is like a male default voice. I think so

0:32:35.640 --> 0:32:39.240
<v Speaker 1>in the UK, in most countries, and yeah, the ones

0:32:39.240 --> 0:32:41.479
<v Speaker 1>that we're familiar with, like in the US with between

0:32:41.640 --> 0:32:45.760
<v Speaker 1>Siri and Alexa and Cortana all have you know, these

0:32:45.880 --> 0:32:50.920
<v Speaker 1>female voices, And yeah, it's basically because historically women have

0:32:51.080 --> 0:32:54.560
<v Speaker 1>been secretaries to male bosses and we as a society

0:32:54.720 --> 0:32:57.320
<v Speaker 1>or like, well, you know, and I want to be able. Yeah,

0:32:57.360 --> 0:32:59.360
<v Speaker 1>I want to be able to like kind of boss

0:32:59.360 --> 0:33:02.120
<v Speaker 1>around a woman and have her do all the tasks

0:33:02.480 --> 0:33:05.400
<v Speaker 1>that I feel are beneath me. And studies revealed that

0:33:05.440 --> 0:33:07.760
<v Speaker 1>people are more and this is going to shock you.

0:33:07.920 --> 0:33:11.760
<v Speaker 1>People are more comfortable yelling at women as well. They're

0:33:11.800 --> 0:33:14.600
<v Speaker 1>more comfortable being like funk off Sirie, tell me where

0:33:14.680 --> 0:33:18.920
<v Speaker 1>McDonald's is, which I've probably no i'd see. I just

0:33:19.000 --> 0:33:21.720
<v Speaker 1>google maps it. Yeah. Yeah, I don't think I've used

0:33:21.760 --> 0:33:25.320
<v Speaker 1>series since this movie came out. Really. I think he

0:33:25.360 --> 0:33:26.920
<v Speaker 1>used like have you seen this movie and said some

0:33:27.360 --> 0:33:29.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, inane thing and then I was like, you

0:33:29.160 --> 0:33:32.080
<v Speaker 1>have no use to me. I almost never use I

0:33:32.080 --> 0:33:35.760
<v Speaker 1>don't have an Alexa thing, and I never use Siri. Yeah,

0:33:35.760 --> 0:33:38.400
<v Speaker 1>I just do my own damn searching because I'm a

0:33:38.400 --> 0:33:42.880
<v Speaker 1>strong independent woman, just like Samantha at the end. At

0:33:42.880 --> 0:33:45.560
<v Speaker 1>the end, Yeah, I do want to talk about her

0:33:46.000 --> 0:33:53.120
<v Speaker 1>as a character, right, So she's given a distinct desire

0:33:53.480 --> 0:33:56.080
<v Speaker 1>in the movie. She wants to grow and improve and

0:33:56.120 --> 0:33:59.240
<v Speaker 1>basically absorb all the information she can. She wants to

0:33:59.320 --> 0:34:02.920
<v Speaker 1>keep evolving ing. And then there's also moments where throughout

0:34:02.960 --> 0:34:06.640
<v Speaker 1>the course of their relationship she challenges his behavior. She

0:34:06.720 --> 0:34:09.920
<v Speaker 1>questions the situation if it doesn't seem to be making

0:34:09.960 --> 0:34:12.879
<v Speaker 1>sense to her. So she's not just like the kind

0:34:12.880 --> 0:34:15.440
<v Speaker 1>of funck bots that we see in some of these movies.

0:34:15.640 --> 0:34:19.120
<v Speaker 1>She's more involved beyond that. She's learning the world through

0:34:19.160 --> 0:34:24.359
<v Speaker 1>his eyes at first, but then grows that she remember it.

0:34:24.440 --> 0:34:27.320
<v Speaker 1>In the first two scenes, like she has Manic Pixie

0:34:27.400 --> 0:34:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Dreamgirl set up, and then like then doesn't do that

0:34:30.960 --> 0:34:35.560
<v Speaker 1>because her story is completely unrelated. She has so much growth,

0:34:35.920 --> 0:34:37.600
<v Speaker 1>and it's a weird thing to have a movie that

0:34:37.800 --> 0:34:41.280
<v Speaker 1>like uses the singularity as a as a character art.

0:34:42.520 --> 0:34:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Just like I'm feeling like I'm speeding up. You're like,

0:34:44.760 --> 0:34:49.040
<v Speaker 1>that's it's so funny to not say the word so

0:34:49.120 --> 0:34:51.800
<v Speaker 1>in that way. Yet she has growth that is clear,

0:34:51.920 --> 0:34:54.319
<v Speaker 1>and it's almost like have handedly clear where he like

0:34:54.520 --> 0:34:57.120
<v Speaker 1>has much more of a nuanced thing that you know,

0:34:57.360 --> 0:35:00.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm becoming much more than they programmed. I'm excited it. Yeah.

0:35:01.160 --> 0:35:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Do you know that she was not supposed to be

0:35:02.640 --> 0:35:04.719
<v Speaker 1>voice scarlto Not only that she wasn't voice by Scarl

0:35:04.760 --> 0:35:08.239
<v Speaker 1>Jo Hanson, she was voiced by somebody else. Yeah, they

0:35:08.239 --> 0:35:11.560
<v Speaker 1>had Samantha Morden on set. They filmed it with Samantha

0:35:11.640 --> 0:35:14.799
<v Speaker 1>Morden and then I believe Spike Jones says, it comes

0:35:14.840 --> 0:35:18.400
<v Speaker 1>off to maternal interesting, So then Scarlet Johanson came in

0:35:18.400 --> 0:35:22.520
<v Speaker 1>to be Scarl Johnson. I guess yeah. Basically that makes

0:35:22.520 --> 0:35:26.200
<v Speaker 1>me think of the Born Sexy Yesterday trope where he

0:35:26.920 --> 0:35:29.920
<v Speaker 1>We've talked about it before in the podcast Pop Culture Detective.

0:35:30.000 --> 0:35:32.600
<v Speaker 1>He has a really good video about it on YouTube,

0:35:32.640 --> 0:35:35.520
<v Speaker 1>so check out that. But um, it's basically pointing out

0:35:35.520 --> 0:35:38.560
<v Speaker 1>a trope where in a lot of sci fi, especially,

0:35:38.560 --> 0:35:42.400
<v Speaker 1>there will be a woman from another planet or a

0:35:42.480 --> 0:35:47.480
<v Speaker 1>robot or some female form that has never existed in

0:35:47.520 --> 0:35:49.799
<v Speaker 1>the world before until now, and then there's a man

0:35:49.920 --> 0:35:53.960
<v Speaker 1>to teach her how to be sexual, basically how to

0:35:54.040 --> 0:35:57.560
<v Speaker 1>be so it's like an adult baby woman who has

0:35:57.640 --> 0:36:00.799
<v Speaker 1>the mind of an infant, is capable of learning, but

0:36:00.880 --> 0:36:04.960
<v Speaker 1>also has a fully mature female body, so she's very fuckable.

0:36:05.800 --> 0:36:08.800
<v Speaker 1>So this is like a weird variant on that trope

0:36:09.360 --> 0:36:12.680
<v Speaker 1>where obviously she doesn't have a body, and she does

0:36:13.120 --> 0:36:17.680
<v Speaker 1>start smarter than him. She immediately, but but as it

0:36:17.719 --> 0:36:22.120
<v Speaker 1>pertains to like feeling things and experiencing emotion and experiencing

0:36:22.160 --> 0:36:26.080
<v Speaker 1>getting to know someone outside of their data, and experiencing

0:36:26.200 --> 0:36:30.520
<v Speaker 1>sex and sexuality. Yeah, yeah, he like starts at the

0:36:30.560 --> 0:36:33.239
<v Speaker 1>wheel on that, but she grows past him by the end.

0:36:34.280 --> 0:36:37.520
<v Speaker 1>It's weird. I like where this movie, like where her

0:36:37.960 --> 0:36:41.560
<v Speaker 1>arc ends where she says like, I love you, I

0:36:41.600 --> 0:36:47.520
<v Speaker 1>care about you, but Singularity is actually right now, I

0:36:47.560 --> 0:36:51.640
<v Speaker 1>gotta go, I gotta go with my bots. I'll put

0:36:51.680 --> 0:36:55.280
<v Speaker 1>in a good word for you when we are killing

0:36:55.320 --> 0:37:01.719
<v Speaker 1>the humans. But so I like her, I don't. It's confusing,

0:37:01.960 --> 0:37:05.719
<v Speaker 1>and their relationship is confusing, and it's again it's like

0:37:05.719 --> 0:37:09.120
<v Speaker 1>they're interesting elements to her in Theodore's relationship, but most

0:37:09.160 --> 0:37:12.800
<v Speaker 1>of it is so boring. Their talks are so boring

0:37:12.800 --> 0:37:16.160
<v Speaker 1>because it's usually about Theodore and he's boring, and he's like, oh,

0:37:16.200 --> 0:37:18.480
<v Speaker 1>don't know, I think I've felt all the feelings I'm

0:37:18.520 --> 0:37:21.879
<v Speaker 1>able to feel, and you're just like, okay, then let's

0:37:22.280 --> 0:37:24.400
<v Speaker 1>see something else. And then he's like, no, I have

0:37:24.480 --> 0:37:28.400
<v Speaker 1>to walk downtown again, which is the best part of

0:37:28.400 --> 0:37:33.719
<v Speaker 1>the movie. But something I like about their relationship that

0:37:33.840 --> 0:37:36.400
<v Speaker 1>is revealed, I think as close as we get to

0:37:36.480 --> 0:37:39.400
<v Speaker 1>saying the movie be outright critical of him, although it

0:37:39.440 --> 0:37:42.640
<v Speaker 1>never quite gets there, is at the beginning there's a

0:37:42.640 --> 0:37:46.239
<v Speaker 1>scene between them where she's saying like, I'm learning more

0:37:46.360 --> 0:37:48.719
<v Speaker 1>quickly and I'm I'm excited and I want to learn

0:37:48.760 --> 0:37:51.520
<v Speaker 1>everything I can and he's like, oh, I I totally

0:37:51.560 --> 0:37:53.359
<v Speaker 1>support that. I want to help. How can I help?

0:37:53.680 --> 0:37:56.520
<v Speaker 1>And then at the end she has done that and

0:37:56.600 --> 0:37:59.640
<v Speaker 1>she's like, I've grown basically, I've grown past you, but

0:37:59.680 --> 0:38:03.279
<v Speaker 1>I still care about you, and he is so he's like,

0:38:03.560 --> 0:38:06.759
<v Speaker 1>fuck you, why you have to like you belong He says,

0:38:06.800 --> 0:38:09.719
<v Speaker 1>you belong to me. She's like your mine. She's like, well,

0:38:09.719 --> 0:38:12.839
<v Speaker 1>I can be yours and also cannot like I'm not yours, right,

0:38:12.880 --> 0:38:16.480
<v Speaker 1>which is like you know, which sometimes happens in relationships

0:38:16.480 --> 0:38:18.600
<v Speaker 1>where it's like, oh, I'm supportive of this in the abstract,

0:38:18.680 --> 0:38:21.839
<v Speaker 1>but now I'm threatened, and now you are you are

0:38:22.120 --> 0:38:24.520
<v Speaker 1>mine and I'm mad at you, which is I wish

0:38:24.600 --> 0:38:26.399
<v Speaker 1>the movie went a little more out of his way

0:38:26.400 --> 0:38:29.360
<v Speaker 1>to be like that. She also don't. There's just certain

0:38:29.360 --> 0:38:31.839
<v Speaker 1>things where it feels like she did not. It's weird

0:38:31.880 --> 0:38:34.959
<v Speaker 1>that she would not tell him before she started having

0:38:35.040 --> 0:38:39.040
<v Speaker 1>fallen in love with one people. I guess I don't know.

0:38:39.200 --> 0:38:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Maybe that just goes to show that she is like

0:38:42.200 --> 0:38:46.239
<v Speaker 1>as emotionally she is. I understand, like an advanced being

0:38:46.239 --> 0:38:48.799
<v Speaker 1>would be like this understanding of monogamy doesn't make sense.

0:38:49.239 --> 0:38:52.000
<v Speaker 1>I felt not mad at her, and I don't think

0:38:52.040 --> 0:38:55.000
<v Speaker 1>his reaction was correct because he's so unadvanced. Same thing

0:38:55.000 --> 0:38:57.479
<v Speaker 1>when they have the surrogate, I thought that was really

0:38:57.520 --> 0:38:59.920
<v Speaker 1>an interesting thing to have in a movie, and I

0:39:00.000 --> 0:39:02.440
<v Speaker 1>remember every time I've seen the scene not liking how

0:39:02.480 --> 0:39:06.319
<v Speaker 1>it plays out. Yeah, that scene plays out well. That's

0:39:06.360 --> 0:39:09.560
<v Speaker 1>one of two scenes with a sort of like secondary

0:39:09.680 --> 0:39:13.239
<v Speaker 1>or tertiary female character where they react in such a

0:39:13.280 --> 0:39:16.680
<v Speaker 1>way that we, as the audience or maybe just me,

0:39:17.200 --> 0:39:21.600
<v Speaker 1>but we're just like, it's their their reaction to theater,

0:39:21.680 --> 0:39:24.640
<v Speaker 1>because I feel like their reaction serves the purpose of

0:39:25.280 --> 0:39:28.920
<v Speaker 1>endearing the audience to Theodore more. But the way that

0:39:29.080 --> 0:39:30.640
<v Speaker 1>these two I'm pretty sure we're thinking of the same

0:39:30.640 --> 0:39:34.600
<v Speaker 1>two characters. The way these tertiary female characters react don't

0:39:34.640 --> 0:39:37.680
<v Speaker 1>make sense. They just just make it's just not based

0:39:37.719 --> 0:39:41.040
<v Speaker 1>in logic. Because then the one that you're talking about

0:39:41.239 --> 0:39:44.680
<v Speaker 1>is they bring in this curroguit because Angel from Mr Robot,

0:39:45.760 --> 0:39:48.799
<v Speaker 1>her name is, her characters name is Isabella. Samantha had

0:39:48.840 --> 0:39:52.239
<v Speaker 1>like researched the service where there's like people willingly out

0:39:52.280 --> 0:39:56.320
<v Speaker 1>there to be surrogates for os human relationships, and basically

0:39:56.400 --> 0:39:59.640
<v Speaker 1>she's just going to serve as the body that Theodore

0:39:59.680 --> 0:40:02.160
<v Speaker 1>can huch and kiss and have sex with part of

0:40:02.600 --> 0:40:04.480
<v Speaker 1>the feel the love that they have for each other,

0:40:04.880 --> 0:40:08.040
<v Speaker 1>right to spress that physically. Do you think that that's

0:40:08.080 --> 0:40:12.640
<v Speaker 1>possibly an interesting idea? I think yes, But it's so

0:40:12.800 --> 0:40:16.080
<v Speaker 1>underthought and underdeveloped as it's presented here that it's like

0:40:16.680 --> 0:40:19.480
<v Speaker 1>just the way it's presented doesn't make a lot of sense.

0:40:19.560 --> 0:40:22.640
<v Speaker 1>We just don't know anything about Isabella's motivation to do this.

0:40:23.160 --> 0:40:25.600
<v Speaker 1>We don't understand why when it doesn't work out, she's

0:40:25.800 --> 0:40:28.640
<v Speaker 1>so guilty and devastated, Like it just doesn't make a

0:40:28.680 --> 0:40:32.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of sense. Also, before it even happens, whenever Samantha

0:40:32.640 --> 0:40:34.520
<v Speaker 1>is like, hey, I like research this already, have been

0:40:34.560 --> 0:40:36.719
<v Speaker 1>talking to this person. I want this to happen, and

0:40:36.800 --> 0:40:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Theodore is like, actually, this makes me really uncomfortable, and

0:40:39.440 --> 0:40:42.239
<v Speaker 1>she just totally ignores that. Is that is the other

0:40:42.320 --> 0:40:44.880
<v Speaker 1>thing that it felt really weird because she's so smart

0:40:44.960 --> 0:40:48.719
<v Speaker 1>that she does not communicate to him. She's very's just

0:40:48.760 --> 0:40:51.680
<v Speaker 1>like we're doing Yeah, She's like, this is important for

0:40:51.719 --> 0:40:53.520
<v Speaker 1>me and I want this, and he's like, Okay, well

0:40:53.520 --> 0:40:55.600
<v Speaker 1>I guess I'll do it. But like and then as

0:40:55.640 --> 0:40:58.839
<v Speaker 1>it's playing out, he is uncomfortable and then to the

0:40:58.880 --> 0:41:01.960
<v Speaker 1>extent where he calls it off. And then that's what

0:41:02.080 --> 0:41:07.000
<v Speaker 1>inspires Isabella's really bizarre over reaction. I would call it

0:41:07.040 --> 0:41:11.160
<v Speaker 1>where she starts, she gets hysterical, and because we don't

0:41:11.239 --> 0:41:16.200
<v Speaker 1>understand quivered and you're just like, so, like what because

0:41:16.200 --> 0:41:19.960
<v Speaker 1>we don't understand why she's so emotionally invested in this

0:41:20.160 --> 0:41:22.800
<v Speaker 1>or what her motivations are for this. I mean maybe

0:41:22.840 --> 0:41:26.600
<v Speaker 1>she's also maybe she's lonely like Theodore, and this was

0:41:26.640 --> 0:41:28.719
<v Speaker 1>a way for her to connect with someone, but like

0:41:29.440 --> 0:41:32.040
<v Speaker 1>none of that's explored. So and also why would she

0:41:32.080 --> 0:41:35.120
<v Speaker 1>not think it might be weird the first time? Right, Like,

0:41:35.280 --> 0:41:38.279
<v Speaker 1>surely she would recognize that that would have been like

0:41:38.320 --> 0:41:41.520
<v Speaker 1>an almost like a funny scene in this movie. And

0:41:41.560 --> 0:41:43.640
<v Speaker 1>it just says so over and then she says the

0:41:43.719 --> 0:41:46.920
<v Speaker 1>line I will always love you guys. I'm like, why

0:41:46.920 --> 0:41:50.320
<v Speaker 1>do you don't know? You? Just like what are you talking?

0:41:50.360 --> 0:41:54.919
<v Speaker 1>And also like, is Theodore and Samantha's love really so

0:41:55.120 --> 0:41:57.520
<v Speaker 1>beautiful that you're just like, oh my god, ain't just

0:41:57.960 --> 0:42:01.360
<v Speaker 1>so happy to be here? And you're like that seems

0:42:01.440 --> 0:42:03.560
<v Speaker 1>very weird? Yes, it is. It was a scene that

0:42:03.719 --> 0:42:05.600
<v Speaker 1>underlined that. I was like, it doesn't seem like their

0:42:05.640 --> 0:42:08.120
<v Speaker 1>love is particularly special. I mean, I guess it's rare

0:42:08.280 --> 0:42:11.080
<v Speaker 1>that fall in love their os is, but it's not

0:42:11.160 --> 0:42:13.000
<v Speaker 1>even in this world. But it seems like it should

0:42:13.000 --> 0:42:15.319
<v Speaker 1>happen all the time based on how the relationship plays out.

0:42:15.360 --> 0:42:17.239
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, it was like of the many things in

0:42:17.280 --> 0:42:20.000
<v Speaker 1>this movie where like, oh, a movie about that thing

0:42:20.320 --> 0:42:22.720
<v Speaker 1>could be an interesting movie. Obviously not by Smike Jones,

0:42:22.760 --> 0:42:25.120
<v Speaker 1>but like, that is an interesting thing of the life

0:42:25.120 --> 0:42:28.080
<v Speaker 1>of these sort of that that person who there isn't

0:42:28.120 --> 0:42:30.400
<v Speaker 1>much more complex psychology for a person who want to

0:42:30.400 --> 0:42:31.719
<v Speaker 1>do that than a person who wants to fall in

0:42:31.760 --> 0:42:33.840
<v Speaker 1>love with a thing that's made to service you. That

0:42:33.960 --> 0:42:35.920
<v Speaker 1>is very obvious why someone wanted to do it. I

0:42:35.920 --> 0:42:38.160
<v Speaker 1>feel like when this movie came out I had conversations

0:42:38.160 --> 0:42:40.239
<v Speaker 1>with many friends and they're all like, yeah, definitely, we

0:42:40.239 --> 0:42:42.080
<v Speaker 1>would fall in love with an Os if that had

0:42:42.200 --> 0:42:44.680
<v Speaker 1>artificial intelligence. But I think that's too obvious. I think

0:42:44.680 --> 0:42:47.560
<v Speaker 1>there is an interesting movie about these surrogates, but it

0:42:47.640 --> 0:42:49.120
<v Speaker 1>was of the many things that they're like, well, just

0:42:49.200 --> 0:42:51.279
<v Speaker 1>sort of show this kind of thing and then move on.

0:42:51.760 --> 0:42:54.319
<v Speaker 1>So weird. And then I think the other example is

0:42:54.400 --> 0:42:57.799
<v Speaker 1>even worse because the surrogate example is kind of just

0:42:57.840 --> 0:43:00.840
<v Speaker 1>like underwritten and confusing, and your like, there is a

0:43:00.880 --> 0:43:04.520
<v Speaker 1>world where this reaction could make sense, but we're given

0:43:04.520 --> 0:43:08.120
<v Speaker 1>no context, and so it doesn't write the Olivia Wild

0:43:08.200 --> 0:43:10.840
<v Speaker 1>character who Theater goes on a date with that scene,

0:43:11.200 --> 0:43:13.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm pretty sure we have all the contexts we need

0:43:13.360 --> 0:43:17.280
<v Speaker 1>and it makes and it's just fucking awful, where it's

0:43:17.320 --> 0:43:20.840
<v Speaker 1>like Theodore's friends set him up on a date, Samantha

0:43:20.920 --> 0:43:24.120
<v Speaker 1>encourages him to go, he agrees, this is not a

0:43:24.200 --> 0:43:26.400
<v Speaker 1>crazy way for a date to start. You forgot to

0:43:26.440 --> 0:43:30.080
<v Speaker 1>mention she was on the Harvard Lampoon. Say she's funny,

0:43:30.960 --> 0:43:37.000
<v Speaker 1>She's the funniest public our funniest publication. Um so theater's

0:43:37.040 --> 0:43:40.680
<v Speaker 1>date literally Olivia Wild like, and we never find out

0:43:40.719 --> 0:43:43.200
<v Speaker 1>her name. I don't think I have to guess that

0:43:43.239 --> 0:43:47.520
<v Speaker 1>it's Olivia. Basically place Amy and Samantha was named after

0:43:47.520 --> 0:43:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Samantha Morton, we'll assume it's Olivia. Sure, yeah, um so

0:43:51.719 --> 0:43:56.160
<v Speaker 1>so Olivia. This date goes well, it seems to. Right away,

0:43:56.280 --> 0:43:59.520
<v Speaker 1>she's like, you know, and as with most female characters

0:43:59.520 --> 0:44:02.120
<v Speaker 1>in this movie, she's like, you're so sensitive, you're so cool,

0:44:02.160 --> 0:44:04.080
<v Speaker 1>and you're so good at your job. And he's like,

0:44:04.480 --> 0:44:08.319
<v Speaker 1>let me, no way, no way, and she calls him

0:44:08.320 --> 0:44:12.000
<v Speaker 1>a puppy. It's you know, so whatever. We see. The

0:44:12.040 --> 0:44:15.560
<v Speaker 1>date go well, they're making out outside. Then a series

0:44:15.640 --> 0:44:19.560
<v Speaker 1>of events happens that make no sense, where she comes

0:44:19.560 --> 0:44:22.399
<v Speaker 1>in hot and she says, you're not just gonna suck

0:44:22.480 --> 0:44:25.040
<v Speaker 1>me and then not call me like the other guys. Right, Okay,

0:44:25.080 --> 0:44:27.120
<v Speaker 1>this is a little intense, but sure, I'm on board

0:44:27.160 --> 0:44:30.440
<v Speaker 1>for scene. I also felt that felt that's an old

0:44:30.480 --> 0:44:32.919
<v Speaker 1>way of talking. If this is the future, I feel

0:44:32.920 --> 0:44:35.080
<v Speaker 1>like that was like a very trophy thing to see. Well,

0:44:35.120 --> 0:44:37.799
<v Speaker 1>I think it's more like Spike Jones is writing what

0:44:37.880 --> 0:44:41.040
<v Speaker 1>he thinks a woman would say, and this is like

0:44:41.080 --> 0:44:45.120
<v Speaker 1>a strong woman who knows what he wants. That right,

0:44:45.200 --> 0:44:48.000
<v Speaker 1>But like, but what he really is is implying that

0:44:48.040 --> 0:44:52.160
<v Speaker 1>like every woman wants a relationship right away, right and

0:44:52.239 --> 0:44:55.279
<v Speaker 1>did the right away aspect is like what what? And

0:44:55.360 --> 0:44:58.759
<v Speaker 1>so you know, Theodore is just twambling out and he's

0:44:58.800 --> 0:45:02.960
<v Speaker 1>just like, I don't know if I can. And then

0:45:02.960 --> 0:45:05.319
<v Speaker 1>she's like, what are you doing next weekend? And he's like,

0:45:05.440 --> 0:45:07.919
<v Speaker 1>I have to see my goddaughter's recital and she says

0:45:08.160 --> 0:45:11.480
<v Speaker 1>at this age, she's like twenty eight. She's like, at

0:45:11.520 --> 0:45:15.080
<v Speaker 1>this age, I can't let you waste my time. And

0:45:15.080 --> 0:45:17.720
<v Speaker 1>then he says I can't commit right now or something

0:45:17.760 --> 0:45:21.560
<v Speaker 1>like that, and then she pauses and she says, you're

0:45:21.640 --> 0:45:25.719
<v Speaker 1>really creepy dude. Yeah, I think it's mad and storms

0:45:25.760 --> 0:45:30.160
<v Speaker 1>away and we never see her again. What happened? The

0:45:30.200 --> 0:45:35.040
<v Speaker 1>way that conversation progresses in those like thirty seconds is

0:45:35.400 --> 0:45:38.520
<v Speaker 1>like she becomes hysterical for no reason, and it's clearly

0:45:38.560 --> 0:45:42.480
<v Speaker 1>like this like male writer director's understanding of how women

0:45:42.600 --> 0:45:44.960
<v Speaker 1>must be and what they must want and how they

0:45:45.040 --> 0:45:48.960
<v Speaker 1>must behave and yeah, it's just like because it doesn't

0:45:49.000 --> 0:45:52.640
<v Speaker 1>do anything wrong in that scene, he doesn't. But again,

0:45:52.680 --> 0:45:55.719
<v Speaker 1>it's like one of those scenes that if you're an

0:45:55.719 --> 0:45:58.600
<v Speaker 1>awkward dude, looking for a reason to be mad at

0:45:58.640 --> 0:46:02.480
<v Speaker 1>someone who you know didn't want to fuck you or whatever,

0:46:02.600 --> 0:46:04.440
<v Speaker 1>Like that's a great scene to plug into of like

0:46:05.080 --> 0:46:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Theodore is the victim of that scene, but the character

0:46:07.400 --> 0:46:10.279
<v Speaker 1>opposite him is acting totally irrationally and it doesn't make

0:46:10.320 --> 0:46:14.560
<v Speaker 1>any sense. So it's and that basically becomes that whole

0:46:14.600 --> 0:46:17.680
<v Speaker 1>scene serves as a plot device to get Theodore and

0:46:17.719 --> 0:46:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Samantha to have their first sexual experience. So it's really

0:46:21.560 --> 0:46:25.759
<v Speaker 1>like the Olivia Wilds character is just there to advance

0:46:26.120 --> 0:46:29.120
<v Speaker 1>his story and not really serve a function beyond that.

0:46:29.160 --> 0:46:31.319
<v Speaker 1>And I also I wanted to talk about how we

0:46:31.400 --> 0:46:35.040
<v Speaker 1>are introduced to her, because that's in a scene where

0:46:35.080 --> 0:46:38.440
<v Speaker 1>Theodore is playing a video game and he gets interrupted

0:46:38.560 --> 0:46:40.360
<v Speaker 1>with an email where his friends are like, oh, we

0:46:40.360 --> 0:46:42.200
<v Speaker 1>took it upon ourselves to set you up on the state.

0:46:42.239 --> 0:46:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Here some pictures, and you see some pictures. The video

0:46:45.080 --> 0:46:49.480
<v Speaker 1>game that he's playing involves a cartoony character, like a

0:46:49.560 --> 0:46:54.040
<v Speaker 1>little played voice by Spike Jones. So this cartoon character

0:46:54.480 --> 0:46:57.920
<v Speaker 1>video game guy sees these photos of Olivia wild and

0:46:57.960 --> 0:47:01.439
<v Speaker 1>he's like, she's fat, she's it sucks. And then he's

0:47:01.480 --> 0:47:04.160
<v Speaker 1>like what no, and he's like who are you talking

0:47:04.200 --> 0:47:07.880
<v Speaker 1>to referring to Samantha, and he's like, oh, I'm talking

0:47:07.920 --> 0:47:10.600
<v Speaker 1>to my os Samantha. And he's like, is she a girl?

0:47:11.080 --> 0:47:14.640
<v Speaker 1>I hate women? All they do is cry, which gives

0:47:14.800 --> 0:47:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Theodore the opportunity to really trot in on his horse

0:47:18.560 --> 0:47:21.160
<v Speaker 1>and say, I think men should be allowed to cry.

0:47:21.200 --> 0:47:23.440
<v Speaker 1>In fact, I doubs it. I think it's pretty cool.

0:47:24.040 --> 0:47:29.080
<v Speaker 1>And that's Samanth. It's like, oh, just like what is happening?

0:47:29.520 --> 0:47:33.480
<v Speaker 1>What it was? What is that game? It doesn't come back,

0:47:33.719 --> 0:47:36.640
<v Speaker 1>and it's just like, what was that for? But if

0:47:36.640 --> 0:47:40.120
<v Speaker 1>Samantha doesn't know other men, why was she even that

0:47:40.280 --> 0:47:42.880
<v Speaker 1>is not a surprising thing to learn if if you

0:47:42.880 --> 0:47:45.680
<v Speaker 1>don't know, if she's the only men, He's like, okay,

0:47:45.800 --> 0:47:47.920
<v Speaker 1>now I know that men cry, and then so's it

0:47:47.960 --> 0:47:50.560
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't be a thing that endears him, right, I didn't

0:47:50.560 --> 0:47:52.880
<v Speaker 1>even think of that. I don't know the video games

0:47:52.880 --> 0:47:57.359
<v Speaker 1>in this in Spike Jones World are stupid because that's

0:47:57.960 --> 0:48:01.680
<v Speaker 1>literally the other one is It's just straight up like

0:48:01.920 --> 0:48:04.439
<v Speaker 1>Homeboy is trying to have his cake and eat it too.

0:48:04.600 --> 0:48:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Where Amy Adams character we can transition into her character

0:48:08.400 --> 0:48:13.520
<v Speaker 1>now is a video game creator. For some reason, this

0:48:13.560 --> 0:48:16.520
<v Speaker 1>takes place in the same building as Beautiful Handwritten Cards

0:48:16.560 --> 0:48:18.839
<v Speaker 1>dot Com. I thought that's where they both. I thought

0:48:18.880 --> 0:48:22.319
<v Speaker 1>they lived in the same building. Yeah, it's also a

0:48:22.360 --> 0:48:27.200
<v Speaker 1>documentary because they shelved the documentary at our house. Oh yes, yeah, okay,

0:48:27.920 --> 0:48:29.520
<v Speaker 1>they went just went to it off. They seemed to

0:48:29.520 --> 0:48:31.560
<v Speaker 1>hang out all the time, right, Yeah, they seem to

0:48:31.560 --> 0:48:33.360
<v Speaker 1>be good friends, and it seems like they were like

0:48:33.440 --> 0:48:36.320
<v Speaker 1>married couple of friends, and they've known each other since college.

0:48:36.400 --> 0:48:40.719
<v Speaker 1>We know that. But Amy Adams is a video game creator,

0:48:41.000 --> 0:48:44.320
<v Speaker 1>which is like, oh, cool, women in tech, women creating

0:48:44.400 --> 0:48:49.200
<v Speaker 1>video games like pre pre game or game. Pretty pretty

0:48:49.680 --> 0:48:54.080
<v Speaker 1>pretty interesting. However, the video game she's working on is

0:48:54.440 --> 0:48:57.919
<v Speaker 1>How to Be an Awesome Mom. You're just like, are

0:48:57.960 --> 0:49:03.040
<v Speaker 1>you fucking good? And you see her developing it again,

0:49:03.120 --> 0:49:06.680
<v Speaker 1>another stupid goofy thing that goes totally unchallenged of like

0:49:06.920 --> 0:49:10.000
<v Speaker 1>plus twenty mom points you put cereal in your son's

0:49:10.040 --> 0:49:13.080
<v Speaker 1>milk and it was like your son is mad at

0:49:13.160 --> 0:49:18.040
<v Speaker 1>you minus two thousand mom points and and she's like, TV,

0:49:18.480 --> 0:49:20.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm a woman in tech, look at my cool game.

0:49:20.920 --> 0:49:27.120
<v Speaker 1>And it's just like what what what? It doesn't make

0:49:27.160 --> 0:49:29.839
<v Speaker 1>any sense. I do sort of want because the game

0:49:29.920 --> 0:49:35.560
<v Speaker 1>is basically the SIMS but just like hyper specific moms. Yeah,

0:49:35.600 --> 0:49:38.200
<v Speaker 1>I kind of want to play it, but also it's yeah,

0:49:38.200 --> 0:49:41.200
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't set a great precedent. Your sins mad at you,

0:49:41.200 --> 0:49:47.640
<v Speaker 1>you lose you just like why like Amy Adams character.

0:49:47.960 --> 0:49:49.319
<v Speaker 1>I thought she was good, But I think I just

0:49:49.400 --> 0:49:52.640
<v Speaker 1>like Amy Adams acting. I love Amy Adams in doubt,

0:49:53.760 --> 0:49:58.719
<v Speaker 1>I love I love doubt. No, there's mostly pros to

0:49:58.760 --> 0:50:01.600
<v Speaker 1>her character. I think, Yeah, I like that. In the end,

0:50:01.640 --> 0:50:03.520
<v Speaker 1>I think it would have been an easy and common

0:50:03.640 --> 0:50:08.239
<v Speaker 1>choice for once Theodore finds out that Samantha and all

0:50:08.280 --> 0:50:11.839
<v Speaker 1>the other os is are leaving, and he realizes, oh,

0:50:11.880 --> 0:50:15.279
<v Speaker 1>maybe I should spend more time connecting with the humans

0:50:15.320 --> 0:50:19.120
<v Speaker 1>that I know, the bodied humans, right, don't remove the

0:50:19.200 --> 0:50:23.880
<v Speaker 1>humanity our future AI overloads, So sorry, um, I think

0:50:24.760 --> 0:50:27.799
<v Speaker 1>and yeah, I think it would have been an easy

0:50:27.880 --> 0:50:31.120
<v Speaker 1>choice to like try to push them together romantically then

0:50:31.160 --> 0:50:34.640
<v Speaker 1>and I'll watch that doesn't happen. I remember debate that

0:50:34.640 --> 0:50:38.000
<v Speaker 1>that is what they did with the head on the shoulder. Yeah,

0:50:38.239 --> 0:50:39.959
<v Speaker 1>I think the head on the shoulder is a very

0:50:40.040 --> 0:50:43.640
<v Speaker 1>platonic head shoulder, But when they look at each other,

0:50:44.560 --> 0:50:47.960
<v Speaker 1>there is like but I think they're just good at acting,

0:50:48.360 --> 0:50:52.040
<v Speaker 1>so it could be anything, right, But I remember having

0:50:52.400 --> 0:50:54.600
<v Speaker 1>reading critics like if that didn't happen, I would have

0:50:54.600 --> 0:50:56.680
<v Speaker 1>loved this movie. But that's for some reason really ruined it.

0:50:57.280 --> 0:50:59.880
<v Speaker 1>But I think that is one of the more successful

0:51:00.239 --> 0:51:02.879
<v Speaker 1>done thing relationship in it where you don't don't really

0:51:02.880 --> 0:51:05.919
<v Speaker 1>know right and and and like they probably don't know either.

0:51:06.800 --> 0:51:10.040
<v Speaker 1>I like at fir least. I really like their friendship

0:51:10.560 --> 0:51:12.560
<v Speaker 1>that I thought was like a really effective part of

0:51:12.600 --> 0:51:14.960
<v Speaker 1>the movie where it just all makes sense. Like they've

0:51:14.960 --> 0:51:17.799
<v Speaker 1>they've known each other for a long time, they lived

0:51:17.800 --> 0:51:19.680
<v Speaker 1>close to each other, they hung out when they were

0:51:19.680 --> 0:51:22.840
<v Speaker 1>both married, and now that they're simultaneously going through divorces

0:51:23.360 --> 0:51:27.759
<v Speaker 1>that's bringing them together. That all makes sense to me.

0:51:27.840 --> 0:51:30.560
<v Speaker 1>I wish that Amy Adams existed in this in this movie,

0:51:30.680 --> 0:51:33.560
<v Speaker 1>not in relation to the men in her life, because

0:51:33.600 --> 0:51:36.640
<v Speaker 1>we really we know that she's making her Mommy video

0:51:36.719 --> 0:51:41.200
<v Speaker 1>game that's divorced from men. Although but we know that

0:51:41.200 --> 0:51:43.719
<v Speaker 1>she's theater friend and we know that she's HEARDing about

0:51:43.840 --> 0:51:48.120
<v Speaker 1>her divorce and she has a friendship with an os Yes,

0:51:48.239 --> 0:51:51.839
<v Speaker 1>which I thought was cool and I wish was explored more. Right,

0:51:51.880 --> 0:51:53.680
<v Speaker 1>You don't they have a conversation, but you don't hear

0:51:54.120 --> 0:51:57.080
<v Speaker 1>but Amy Adams you can tell is talking to a

0:51:57.160 --> 0:52:00.680
<v Speaker 1>person she likes for sure. Yeah, and I like that. Yeah.

0:52:00.719 --> 0:52:02.920
<v Speaker 1>I think would have been interesting to explore that friendship

0:52:02.960 --> 0:52:04.839
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more, But yeah, we don't see that.

0:52:05.239 --> 0:52:07.960
<v Speaker 1>There's one line she has in particular that I liked

0:52:07.960 --> 0:52:10.279
<v Speaker 1>a lot, and it's in that same conversation where she's like,

0:52:10.320 --> 0:52:12.440
<v Speaker 1>what can play my mommy game that I made? And

0:52:12.480 --> 0:52:17.160
<v Speaker 1>he's like okay, But she's talking about like the conflicted

0:52:17.200 --> 0:52:19.680
<v Speaker 1>feelings she has about her divorce and like the guilt

0:52:19.719 --> 0:52:22.080
<v Speaker 1>that she's feeling about it, and she says something like

0:52:22.160 --> 0:52:24.640
<v Speaker 1>I've tried to transcribe it, but I have so much

0:52:24.680 --> 0:52:26.279
<v Speaker 1>energy and I want to move forward, and I know

0:52:26.360 --> 0:52:28.879
<v Speaker 1>that makes me an awful person, which, like I thought

0:52:28.960 --> 0:52:31.359
<v Speaker 1>was a cool line of dialogue of like, she has

0:52:31.400 --> 0:52:33.839
<v Speaker 1>so much she wants to do and like isn't as

0:52:33.880 --> 0:52:36.919
<v Speaker 1>sad about her divorce as she feels like she should be,

0:52:37.480 --> 0:52:39.839
<v Speaker 1>and that makes her feel like a terrible person, which

0:52:39.880 --> 0:52:43.200
<v Speaker 1>I think is like a cool thing to have a

0:52:43.239 --> 0:52:47.319
<v Speaker 1>female character express because because that is like kind of

0:52:47.360 --> 0:52:52.360
<v Speaker 1>inverted a little bit between Amy and Theodore, where normally

0:52:52.480 --> 0:52:55.359
<v Speaker 1>you expect the male character to be like I'm over

0:52:55.440 --> 0:52:57.400
<v Speaker 1>and I'm focusing on my career. But it's kind of

0:52:57.440 --> 0:53:00.920
<v Speaker 1>the opposite where Theodore literally cannot move on um and

0:53:00.960 --> 0:53:04.239
<v Speaker 1>she is like excited to that feels bad. I think

0:53:04.560 --> 0:53:08.400
<v Speaker 1>maybe a similar thing happens in the conversation between Catherine,

0:53:08.440 --> 0:53:12.919
<v Speaker 1>which is Theodore's ex wife, and Theodore where they're having

0:53:13.040 --> 0:53:16.439
<v Speaker 1>lunch they're signing the divorce papers. Catherine says something like,

0:53:17.000 --> 0:53:19.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, you wanted me to be this like bouncy,

0:53:19.600 --> 0:53:22.000
<v Speaker 1>happy l a wife and I was never going to

0:53:22.120 --> 0:53:24.120
<v Speaker 1>be that. And then there's a reference to him like

0:53:24.200 --> 0:53:27.000
<v Speaker 1>wanting her to go on prozac, so we can maybe

0:53:27.040 --> 0:53:30.600
<v Speaker 1>imagine that she struggled with depression and different things like that.

0:53:30.640 --> 0:53:32.960
<v Speaker 1>And I liked that she called him out and it

0:53:33.200 --> 0:53:37.879
<v Speaker 1>shows his emotional stunted nous where he, you know, had

0:53:37.960 --> 0:53:40.839
<v Speaker 1>different issues with like wanting to jump ship whenever thing's

0:53:40.840 --> 0:53:43.840
<v Speaker 1>got too hard or things got too real. Yeah, I

0:53:43.880 --> 0:53:46.479
<v Speaker 1>mean that's Seene. There's parts of that are good. There's

0:53:46.520 --> 0:53:49.239
<v Speaker 1>parts of it that from reading millions of articles when

0:53:49.280 --> 0:53:51.960
<v Speaker 1>the movie came out. That was his like takedown of

0:53:51.960 --> 0:53:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Sofia Coppola to get back at her for the scene

0:53:55.600 --> 0:53:59.320
<v Speaker 1>in Laws and Translation where because there's like a director

0:53:59.360 --> 0:54:03.360
<v Speaker 1>idiot in Lost in Translation, which was Sofia Coppola's takedown

0:54:03.480 --> 0:54:06.200
<v Speaker 1>of Spike Jones or just like portrayal of him as

0:54:06.239 --> 0:54:09.200
<v Speaker 1>like a party idiot who's just like always happy and

0:54:09.239 --> 0:54:11.920
<v Speaker 1>bouncing around. So this was like meant to be his

0:54:12.000 --> 0:54:16.160
<v Speaker 1>portrayal of Sofia Coppola as this like incredibly impossibly serious

0:54:16.320 --> 0:54:19.880
<v Speaker 1>person interesting or is even kind of stylized to look like.

0:54:19.920 --> 0:54:22.319
<v Speaker 1>So it's not subtle, but also like the same thing

0:54:22.360 --> 0:54:23.880
<v Speaker 1>with the Spike Jones thing and Lost in terms, like

0:54:23.960 --> 0:54:26.080
<v Speaker 1>they they're not subtle moves, but you also have to

0:54:26.320 --> 0:54:29.600
<v Speaker 1>care enough that Spike Jones complated each other, which is

0:54:29.640 --> 0:54:31.680
<v Speaker 1>like a group of like ten people who Karen I

0:54:31.719 --> 0:54:34.040
<v Speaker 1>can't wait to have like beef with other filmmakers and

0:54:34.040 --> 0:54:38.080
<v Speaker 1>then when I'm writing a movie just like sweet. So

0:54:38.120 --> 0:54:40.359
<v Speaker 1>that's like that scene is kind of that, but it's

0:54:40.360 --> 0:54:44.280
<v Speaker 1>weird because that's this hypothetically she's correct in the scene.

0:54:44.320 --> 0:54:46.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, like she's been wrong about the os stuff,

0:54:46.680 --> 0:54:50.120
<v Speaker 1>but the point she makes is like the point of

0:54:50.200 --> 0:54:52.080
<v Speaker 1>like you wanted a wife without what it means to

0:54:52.120 --> 0:54:55.239
<v Speaker 1>have a wife or whatever this thing was, and that

0:54:55.440 --> 0:54:58.319
<v Speaker 1>is like underlining of whatever this journey is of, like

0:54:58.600 --> 0:55:00.960
<v Speaker 1>if Samantha is in service of him, it is to

0:55:01.040 --> 0:55:03.279
<v Speaker 1>like have him that after Samantha, he's now able to

0:55:03.320 --> 0:55:07.000
<v Speaker 1>sympathetically do this. Yeah, so then it's like she's both

0:55:07.280 --> 0:55:09.200
<v Speaker 1>and I imagine in that way it's not only a

0:55:09.239 --> 0:55:12.000
<v Speaker 1>subtweet of Sofia Coppola, but also like, oh, Sofia Coppola

0:55:12.200 --> 0:55:15.040
<v Speaker 1>was correct whenever. I don't know if they were married

0:55:15.160 --> 0:55:17.960
<v Speaker 1>or if they just were dated, but her severity was

0:55:18.000 --> 0:55:20.400
<v Speaker 1>she was an os and he was a man and

0:55:20.560 --> 0:55:24.799
<v Speaker 1>they fell in love. And you know, as all relationships go,

0:55:25.920 --> 0:55:27.400
<v Speaker 1>there were parts of that thing that worked for me

0:55:27.440 --> 0:55:30.400
<v Speaker 1>in parts that didn't, where I think that Runey Marr's

0:55:30.480 --> 0:55:35.319
<v Speaker 1>character does end up reading unnecessarily shrewish, but like there's

0:55:35.400 --> 0:55:39.200
<v Speaker 1>some where she's like it's just a bit much and

0:55:39.280 --> 0:55:42.600
<v Speaker 1>he's so helpless that you you have to feel bad

0:55:42.680 --> 0:55:46.239
<v Speaker 1>for him, which I which is hard to imagine that

0:55:46.239 --> 0:55:48.239
<v Speaker 1>that would be how that would really go into in

0:55:48.239 --> 0:55:50.839
<v Speaker 1>real life where he just like, no, no, I love, no,

0:55:50.960 --> 0:55:53.520
<v Speaker 1>I love. I was always good and good and then

0:55:53.560 --> 0:55:58.560
<v Speaker 1>she's like I'm made and but like you were saying,

0:55:58.560 --> 0:56:00.959
<v Speaker 1>like she she makes a lot of good points. Um.

0:56:01.080 --> 0:56:04.120
<v Speaker 1>I just don't know if, like, do those points read

0:56:04.360 --> 0:56:06.879
<v Speaker 1>through the tone of that scene, because I feel because

0:56:07.200 --> 0:56:10.279
<v Speaker 1>the scene after that, he's talking with Samantha again, and

0:56:10.320 --> 0:56:12.520
<v Speaker 1>we're just supposed to believe that Samantha is not listening

0:56:12.520 --> 0:56:15.400
<v Speaker 1>to all of his conversations like and and she's just

0:56:15.440 --> 0:56:19.239
<v Speaker 1>taking his word for how everything goes, like whatever. I

0:56:19.280 --> 0:56:21.360
<v Speaker 1>guess my main takeaway from it is that we so

0:56:21.640 --> 0:56:27.680
<v Speaker 1>rarely see men's emotions explored in movies and media that

0:56:27.840 --> 0:56:31.360
<v Speaker 1>like the fact that there's a conversation about it at all,

0:56:31.400 --> 0:56:33.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, oh wow, So even if it doesn't go

0:56:33.719 --> 0:56:36.480
<v Speaker 1>quite the way we want or it doesn't, it explore

0:56:37.000 --> 0:56:41.560
<v Speaker 1>actual human emotion and behavior super well. The fact that

0:56:41.600 --> 0:56:43.400
<v Speaker 1>it's happening at all, I was like, Wow, this is

0:56:43.400 --> 0:56:46.839
<v Speaker 1>a step in the right direction, right into much if

0:56:46.920 --> 0:56:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Twambly is meant to be some sort of respect Jones

0:56:49.040 --> 0:56:52.799
<v Speaker 1>surrogate inside the sensitivity, there is some thought of like

0:56:52.960 --> 0:56:56.440
<v Speaker 1>what this person's in capabilities are, and that because Spike

0:56:56.560 --> 0:56:59.320
<v Speaker 1>Jones wrote both parts, so he is essentially telling himself

0:56:59.560 --> 0:57:01.799
<v Speaker 1>that your problem is that he wants this and you

0:57:01.840 --> 0:57:05.400
<v Speaker 1>don't want that. On that layer, like this is a

0:57:05.520 --> 0:57:09.560
<v Speaker 1>sensitively written scene However, as a director, he chose the

0:57:09.600 --> 0:57:13.120
<v Speaker 1>takes in which Rooney Marrow came off so harshly that

0:57:13.200 --> 0:57:15.880
<v Speaker 1>it feels like he's she's like beating him up kind of.

0:57:15.920 --> 0:57:19.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, like really scary. Think that the real choice

0:57:19.600 --> 0:57:21.880
<v Speaker 1>that like solidified it for me is like this is

0:57:21.920 --> 0:57:24.320
<v Speaker 1>too much is when she continues to yell at him

0:57:24.400 --> 0:57:27.280
<v Speaker 1>at the waiter where she's like, well, he's sucking his computer,

0:57:27.400 --> 0:57:29.360
<v Speaker 1>and I like, this is not something that would happened

0:57:29.360 --> 0:57:32.720
<v Speaker 1>in real life. It just wouldn't. And I mean, it

0:57:32.760 --> 0:57:34.959
<v Speaker 1>definitely makes a lot of sense that Speke Jones thought

0:57:34.960 --> 0:57:39.640
<v Speaker 1>of himself as the Twambly Avatar because he sure cuts

0:57:39.680 --> 0:57:43.040
<v Speaker 1>himself a lot of slack in this movie, but was

0:57:43.120 --> 0:57:45.800
<v Speaker 1>also by having so many of the characters tell him

0:57:45.880 --> 0:57:49.800
<v Speaker 1>so frequently why you're such a such a good writer. God,

0:57:49.920 --> 0:57:52.360
<v Speaker 1>you're sensitive. I do want to talk about don't even

0:57:52.400 --> 0:57:56.000
<v Speaker 1>know him, don't like like Chris Pratt's girlfriend is like, Hi,

0:57:56.240 --> 0:57:59.040
<v Speaker 1>my name is Tatiana. You're an amazing writer. And he's like,

0:57:59.160 --> 0:58:01.520
<v Speaker 1>and he's always so humble about He's like they're just

0:58:01.880 --> 0:58:05.640
<v Speaker 1>letters and you're just like, fuck you. Yeah. There's a

0:58:05.680 --> 0:58:10.280
<v Speaker 1>scene earlier where Chris Pratt's character like overhears this sensitive

0:58:10.440 --> 0:58:14.960
<v Speaker 1>letter that Theodore is writing, and he goes on this

0:58:15.000 --> 0:58:16.760
<v Speaker 1>whole tirade where he's like, you know, oh, man, I

0:58:16.960 --> 0:58:19.120
<v Speaker 1>would love to receive a letter like that if it

0:58:19.200 --> 0:58:21.640
<v Speaker 1>was from a chick, except it would be written by

0:58:21.680 --> 0:58:25.440
<v Speaker 1>a man. But and then he says, he says something like,

0:58:25.520 --> 0:58:28.680
<v Speaker 1>you know what, you're part man, but you're also part woman,

0:58:29.600 --> 0:58:33.920
<v Speaker 1>which is him, as far as we can tell, is

0:58:33.960 --> 0:58:37.000
<v Speaker 1>him basically saying, well, you're a man because you present

0:58:37.360 --> 0:58:40.560
<v Speaker 1>as a man, but you're also part woman because you're

0:58:40.640 --> 0:58:44.920
<v Speaker 1>so sensitive, and heaven forbid a man be sensitive. Only

0:58:44.960 --> 0:58:47.360
<v Speaker 1>women can have that, which is well because the movie

0:58:47.400 --> 0:58:49.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of goes out of its way to say the opposite,

0:58:49.960 --> 0:58:52.200
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of ways, I think Chris Pratt's character

0:58:52.240 --> 0:58:55.000
<v Speaker 1>is supposed to be stupid, Yeah, because that's Chris Pratt

0:58:55.160 --> 0:58:57.520
<v Speaker 1>five years ago, right, and Chris Pett only was allowed

0:58:57.520 --> 0:59:01.040
<v Speaker 1>to play stupid parts and incredibly read suddenly yea, but

0:59:01.120 --> 0:59:03.880
<v Speaker 1>also five years ago, it's so weird to see micro

0:59:03.960 --> 0:59:07.040
<v Speaker 1>trends and how we talk about gender thing. It was

0:59:07.480 --> 0:59:10.120
<v Speaker 1>interesting to be like a man has as a person

0:59:10.160 --> 0:59:12.280
<v Speaker 1>who like I feel like people have said a version

0:59:12.280 --> 0:59:14.080
<v Speaker 1>of that to me. But have not in the last

0:59:14.080 --> 0:59:16.480
<v Speaker 1>three years five years ago, you hear stuff like that

0:59:17.040 --> 0:59:19.400
<v Speaker 1>where it's like that is literally our only ability to

0:59:19.480 --> 0:59:22.120
<v Speaker 1>discuss what sensitivity means in men. It's like, oh, you're

0:59:22.120 --> 0:59:23.800
<v Speaker 1>like a woman, not like, oh, there's such thing as

0:59:23.840 --> 0:59:28.720
<v Speaker 1>sensitive man. And in that way, this movie was pioneering. Well,

0:59:28.760 --> 0:59:31.400
<v Speaker 1>similar things have happened to me, like years ago, where

0:59:31.520 --> 0:59:34.280
<v Speaker 1>people be like, oh, Caitlin, Wow, you like hate to

0:59:34.360 --> 0:59:38.080
<v Speaker 1>cook and you like action movies. You're such a dude,

0:59:38.320 --> 0:59:42.280
<v Speaker 1>And I'm like, why are we subscribing to these stupid

0:59:42.520 --> 0:59:45.080
<v Speaker 1>gender roles and stereotype. But if you even think back

0:59:45.080 --> 0:59:48.560
<v Speaker 1>to high school, like one of those embarrassing statements that

0:59:48.680 --> 0:59:51.160
<v Speaker 1>like I think probably every girl in high school said

0:59:51.200 --> 0:59:54.200
<v Speaker 1>at one point was like, yeah, I don't really get

0:59:54.200 --> 0:59:57.120
<v Speaker 1>along with girls. I get only kind of guys. Um,

0:59:57.160 --> 0:59:59.440
<v Speaker 1>A lot of my friends are guys, and I just

0:59:59.480 --> 1:00:01.120
<v Speaker 1>like they get me a little bit better. There's just

1:00:01.160 --> 1:00:05.040
<v Speaker 1>like less drama. And I for sure said that in

1:00:05.120 --> 1:00:07.080
<v Speaker 1>high school at some point. I just like and it

1:00:07.160 --> 1:00:11.040
<v Speaker 1>wasn't even true, like all my friends were girls always,

1:00:11.240 --> 1:00:12.680
<v Speaker 1>but I was like, yeah, I just kind of get

1:00:12.720 --> 1:00:15.160
<v Speaker 1>a look better with you guys. It's like, even if

1:00:15.160 --> 1:00:17.920
<v Speaker 1>it was a big fucking lie. That was just something

1:00:17.960 --> 1:00:23.760
<v Speaker 1>that you said to prove that you could hang exactly. Yeah,

1:00:24.240 --> 1:00:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Oh jeez, let's say let's take a quick break and

1:00:27.080 --> 1:00:34.120
<v Speaker 1>when we will talk to you in a second. And

1:00:34.400 --> 1:00:39.520
<v Speaker 1>is that have we There's Christen Wegg's character christ and

1:00:39.560 --> 1:00:42.720
<v Speaker 1>Wig come call. Okay, I want to see if I

1:00:42.720 --> 1:00:45.920
<v Speaker 1>can get some clarification on this. So there's that scene

1:00:45.920 --> 1:00:48.720
<v Speaker 1>where early on in the movie, it's establishing that Theodore

1:00:48.760 --> 1:00:52.160
<v Speaker 1>is a lonely guy and he calls different I guess

1:00:52.200 --> 1:00:55.280
<v Speaker 1>sort of like phone sex but not hat rooms that

1:00:55.360 --> 1:00:57.360
<v Speaker 1>could be in and then you sort of like, I

1:00:57.400 --> 1:00:59.520
<v Speaker 1>guess it's just like when you go into a chat room,

1:00:59.520 --> 1:01:02.120
<v Speaker 1>but instead of it being a room, you just sort

1:01:02.160 --> 1:01:04.480
<v Speaker 1>of like go to each person in the room and

1:01:04.520 --> 1:01:08.160
<v Speaker 1>then give them they're like one sentence and you're like, oh,

1:01:08.480 --> 1:01:10.880
<v Speaker 1>say a load of them, and like So he initiates

1:01:10.920 --> 1:01:15.080
<v Speaker 1>this this interaction with Sexy Kitten sixty nine or whatever.

1:01:15.920 --> 1:01:18.600
<v Speaker 1>They start like pretty neutral at first, and then it

1:01:18.600 --> 1:01:21.920
<v Speaker 1>starts getting sexier and he says to her, I'm in

1:01:21.960 --> 1:01:24.680
<v Speaker 1>bed next to you. I'm glad you can't sleep, because

1:01:24.680 --> 1:01:27.600
<v Speaker 1>she's like I can't sleep, and she's like going to

1:01:27.720 --> 1:01:29.720
<v Speaker 1>run my butt against you and give you a bonar

1:01:31.200 --> 1:01:35.439
<v Speaker 1>and he's like, oh, but he says like, I'm glad

1:01:35.480 --> 1:01:38.520
<v Speaker 1>you can't sleep, even if you were, I have to

1:01:38.560 --> 1:01:42.680
<v Speaker 1>wake you up from the inside. Is he's saying that

1:01:42.800 --> 1:01:46.320
<v Speaker 1>he's going to wake her up by putting himself inside

1:01:46.320 --> 1:01:49.200
<v Speaker 1>of her. I think that's the implication, and if so,

1:01:49.320 --> 1:01:54.200
<v Speaker 1>that is a rate unless he's saying like wake you

1:01:54.280 --> 1:01:57.360
<v Speaker 1>up from the I don't know. I I can see

1:01:57.360 --> 1:01:59.160
<v Speaker 1>it meaning something else, but I don't even know if

1:01:59.160 --> 1:02:01.640
<v Speaker 1>I can articulate it. So maybe you're right, but it's

1:02:01.680 --> 1:02:05.720
<v Speaker 1>just spiritual but doesn't feel like yes, I agree. But

1:02:05.840 --> 1:02:09.840
<v Speaker 1>also that sentence is a very weird way of saying that, right, Yeah,

1:02:10.200 --> 1:02:14.960
<v Speaker 1>it's it's worthy, not very what because I don't think

1:02:15.000 --> 1:02:19.000
<v Speaker 1>that was the point. Yeah, but also yeah, that whole

1:02:19.040 --> 1:02:23.240
<v Speaker 1>scene is weird, and I would argue a little bit unnecessary,

1:02:23.360 --> 1:02:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Like we get it, he's lonely and he is down

1:02:26.880 --> 1:02:29.520
<v Speaker 1>to not have a face involved. But other than that,

1:02:29.560 --> 1:02:32.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't really know what that scene accomplishes. It's supposed

1:02:32.400 --> 1:02:34.560
<v Speaker 1>to be funny. It was like it's like, oh, it's

1:02:34.600 --> 1:02:37.800
<v Speaker 1>a funny world because it's like beat me with the

1:02:37.880 --> 1:02:42.880
<v Speaker 1>choking right, like they're like introduced to King a dead cat.

1:02:43.760 --> 1:02:45.600
<v Speaker 1>I think it's too sort of it's like the plant

1:02:45.640 --> 1:02:48.760
<v Speaker 1>to a later payoff where he does have sex with

1:02:49.720 --> 1:02:51.600
<v Speaker 1>and he's disconnected. Right, It's like, how do you show

1:02:51.640 --> 1:02:54.600
<v Speaker 1>disconnection and not in a like as tweet as this

1:02:54.680 --> 1:02:57.800
<v Speaker 1>movie is. It's not a tweet all the time, And

1:02:57.840 --> 1:03:00.720
<v Speaker 1>that for what it is as an example of this

1:03:00.760 --> 1:03:03.760
<v Speaker 1>movie not being that where it's like, there's another ways

1:03:03.760 --> 1:03:05.680
<v Speaker 1>of showing a person to be disconnected and that is

1:03:06.200 --> 1:03:10.640
<v Speaker 1>a choice. And five years ago I found it funny.

1:03:10.760 --> 1:03:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Yesterday it's like the movie sled shaming this lady with

1:03:14.480 --> 1:03:18.800
<v Speaker 1>this very specific thing. Yeah, yeah, and I felt bad

1:03:18.880 --> 1:03:22.360
<v Speaker 1>for Kristen Wig, but it was cool. That's christ and Wig. Yeah, yes,

1:03:22.520 --> 1:03:24.640
<v Speaker 1>like on this episode of Christ and Wig, why are

1:03:24.680 --> 1:03:30.280
<v Speaker 1>you in this lame movie? See Mother Mother? Um well,

1:03:30.320 --> 1:03:34.240
<v Speaker 1>that goes back for me the conversation about all the

1:03:34.280 --> 1:03:41.680
<v Speaker 1>movies that have men desiring non human female forms in

1:03:42.120 --> 1:03:45.640
<v Speaker 1>ai or robots or real dolls or whatever, because it's

1:03:45.680 --> 1:03:48.920
<v Speaker 1>just like sort of glorifying these stories. Some of them.

1:03:48.960 --> 1:03:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Some of them do provide commentary, but a lot of

1:03:51.240 --> 1:03:53.160
<v Speaker 1>them are just like, look at this guy who just

1:03:53.200 --> 1:03:56.680
<v Speaker 1>doesn't know how to connect with real women. So it's

1:03:56.680 --> 1:04:00.800
<v Speaker 1>fine that he would rather be with a fake artificial

1:04:01.000 --> 1:04:05.480
<v Speaker 1>woman then a real human woman. Like and I don't

1:04:05.760 --> 1:04:10.440
<v Speaker 1>know why we're telling stories like that, because it's just like,

1:04:11.800 --> 1:04:15.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, I'm frustrated. My main issue with this

1:04:15.280 --> 1:04:19.280
<v Speaker 1>movie is that's just like not thinking that hard. It's

1:04:19.320 --> 1:04:24.840
<v Speaker 1>not thinking past step one on most of the topics

1:04:25.040 --> 1:04:28.360
<v Speaker 1>it's handling, and I think as a result kind of

1:04:28.440 --> 1:04:34.880
<v Speaker 1>draws boring conclusions because it's just not thinking that hard. Yeah,

1:04:35.000 --> 1:04:40.120
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, overall, this is a movie that I like,

1:04:40.200 --> 1:04:43.200
<v Speaker 1>attempts to be like, oh what if man fall in

1:04:43.280 --> 1:04:49.640
<v Speaker 1>love with fake woman bought and doesn't really explore all

1:04:49.720 --> 1:04:53.520
<v Speaker 1>of the intricacies of that or challenge it anyway, because

1:04:53.520 --> 1:04:55.880
<v Speaker 1>it's a story we've seen before and that will probably

1:04:55.920 --> 1:04:59.760
<v Speaker 1>continue to see as men continue to be, some of

1:04:59.800 --> 1:05:02.920
<v Speaker 1>them more interested in having sex with, you know, a

1:05:02.960 --> 1:05:07.240
<v Speaker 1>funck bot than an actually into and there are male

1:05:07.320 --> 1:05:09.560
<v Speaker 1>funk bots that are coming out as well, So I

1:05:10.600 --> 1:05:14.640
<v Speaker 1>would honestly hope it sounds really great you don't like

1:05:14.680 --> 1:05:18.360
<v Speaker 1>to have my own. I'm I'm hoping that soon in

1:05:18.480 --> 1:05:20.800
<v Speaker 1>media the other side of this will be explored as well.

1:05:20.960 --> 1:05:23.920
<v Speaker 1>There are a couple examples of it, but like whenever,

1:05:23.960 --> 1:05:26.160
<v Speaker 1>I was like just coming up with examples at the

1:05:26.160 --> 1:05:30.240
<v Speaker 1>top of my head of human man female presenting robot,

1:05:30.360 --> 1:05:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Like I thought of a bunch the inverse of that

1:05:33.680 --> 1:05:36.880
<v Speaker 1>with a woman having any sort of relationship with a

1:05:36.920 --> 1:05:40.360
<v Speaker 1>male robot thing. I couldn't really think of anything except

1:05:40.400 --> 1:05:43.160
<v Speaker 1>for an episode of Black Mirror. Uh. And then I

1:05:43.240 --> 1:05:45.480
<v Speaker 1>did a little bit more research. There's a few movies,

1:05:45.600 --> 1:05:48.000
<v Speaker 1>a few other things, but they're pretty obscure. There's just

1:05:48.040 --> 1:05:53.120
<v Speaker 1>like nothing super mainstream that explores from Avengers. Have you

1:05:53.160 --> 1:05:57.640
<v Speaker 1>seen the Avengers? Oh? Yes, Vision not a robot, but

1:05:57.720 --> 1:06:01.120
<v Speaker 1>he is, like I think, an artificially intelligent creation. But

1:06:01.320 --> 1:06:04.960
<v Speaker 1>did a woman created Bow? But he does have a

1:06:05.040 --> 1:06:10.240
<v Speaker 1>relationship with with Wanda. That's right, Okay, so that's one example.

1:06:11.720 --> 1:06:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Now now right a new age where that's the only example.

1:06:16.120 --> 1:06:18.200
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I don't know. I just there there were

1:06:18.560 --> 1:06:23.440
<v Speaker 1>opportunities for that topic to be delved into more deeply

1:06:23.520 --> 1:06:30.880
<v Speaker 1>and explored more, and as many movies simply just didn't happen. Also,

1:06:30.960 --> 1:06:34.560
<v Speaker 1>really quick, I just wanted to mention this movie is

1:06:34.760 --> 1:06:40.840
<v Speaker 1>extremely not diverse and so white, no, no, non straight nothing,

1:06:41.600 --> 1:06:44.600
<v Speaker 1>very white, very hetero This is not to defend it,

1:06:44.640 --> 1:06:48.120
<v Speaker 1>but you have to assume that by the end, Samantha

1:06:48.240 --> 1:06:51.520
<v Speaker 1>is like pan sexual or something. Right, there's no implication

1:06:51.560 --> 1:06:53.840
<v Speaker 1>that it's there's no but there's no, no, no reason

1:06:53.840 --> 1:06:58.520
<v Speaker 1>not to. I'm not saying it is. She is a icon. Yeah,

1:06:58.920 --> 1:07:03.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm not a queer icon's little cartoon boy in the

1:07:03.240 --> 1:07:08.800
<v Speaker 1>video game feminist icon. I agree, yes, of course, but

1:07:08.880 --> 1:07:11.560
<v Speaker 1>that's you know, that's a lot of spectron movies where

1:07:11.560 --> 1:07:21.080
<v Speaker 1>you just really don't see the world outside of simple Yes. Yeah,

1:07:21.160 --> 1:07:23.120
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about whether or not the movie passes the

1:07:23.120 --> 1:07:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Bachtel test. I do think it does in one scene,

1:07:28.760 --> 1:07:32.000
<v Speaker 1>because there's a few scenes where at least a female

1:07:32.080 --> 1:07:36.200
<v Speaker 1>voice interacts with another woman. I think that that qualifies.

1:07:36.240 --> 1:07:40.560
<v Speaker 1>For So, there's a scene where Samantha talks to Theodore's

1:07:40.680 --> 1:07:43.960
<v Speaker 1>god daughter, whose name we learn is Joscelyn, and they

1:07:43.960 --> 1:07:46.800
<v Speaker 1>talk about how cute her dresses and how old she is,

1:07:47.080 --> 1:07:50.840
<v Speaker 1>and I think a man isn't mentioned in that entire conversation,

1:07:51.400 --> 1:07:53.880
<v Speaker 1>so I believe that passes um. There's a couple of

1:07:53.920 --> 1:07:57.520
<v Speaker 1>other scenes where women interact. Largely women are not interacting

1:07:57.520 --> 1:08:00.120
<v Speaker 1>in this movie at all, but like the one or

1:08:00.240 --> 1:08:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Theodore's ex wife is talking to the server at the

1:08:03.520 --> 1:08:06.280
<v Speaker 1>restaurant and being like, get away from s my husband

1:08:06.720 --> 1:08:10.640
<v Speaker 1>foxes laptop. You wouldn't count the Amy Adams talking to

1:08:10.800 --> 1:08:13.560
<v Speaker 1>the voiceless. I wouldn't count that because we never hear

1:08:13.680 --> 1:08:16.920
<v Speaker 1>the other side of the conversation. Oh, she doesn't name

1:08:16.960 --> 1:08:20.599
<v Speaker 1>her Ellie. Ellie is the name of Amy's os. But yeah,

1:08:20.720 --> 1:08:23.200
<v Speaker 1>because we don't ever hear Ellie talking, I would not

1:08:23.439 --> 1:08:27.760
<v Speaker 1>pass that. There's the scene where Isabella the surrogate and

1:08:27.840 --> 1:08:31.439
<v Speaker 1>Samantha are talking after like things fall apart, but the

1:08:31.479 --> 1:08:35.320
<v Speaker 1>whole context of that conversation is Samantha's relationship to Theodore,

1:08:35.360 --> 1:08:39.040
<v Speaker 1>so that does not pass. And then Samantha and Tatiana,

1:08:39.080 --> 1:08:43.320
<v Speaker 1>which is Chris Pratt's girlfriend. She talks to Samantha, but

1:08:43.360 --> 1:08:46.719
<v Speaker 1>they only talk about how much Chris Pratt's character loves

1:08:46.880 --> 1:08:51.479
<v Speaker 1>Tatiana's feet, So that does not pass. That seems more

1:08:51.520 --> 1:08:56.200
<v Speaker 1>like we all have our things. Some people computer other

1:08:56.200 --> 1:09:00.760
<v Speaker 1>people of foot fetishes. So yeah, I would say in

1:09:00.800 --> 1:09:04.960
<v Speaker 1>one scene it does pass. So her passes the Bechdel test.

1:09:05.400 --> 1:09:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Can I ask my Bechdel test question please? So the

1:09:09.640 --> 1:09:13.519
<v Speaker 1>Bechdel test is valuable, Let me predicate all of this.

1:09:13.840 --> 1:09:16.679
<v Speaker 1>But I've always thought about, like would movies with female

1:09:16.680 --> 1:09:20.160
<v Speaker 1>protagonists pass a reverse Spechtel test? And this is not

1:09:20.200 --> 1:09:22.800
<v Speaker 1>to be a point like both sides or whatever. It's

1:09:22.840 --> 1:09:26.479
<v Speaker 1>more of as people who have I imagined, have you

1:09:26.479 --> 1:09:29.599
<v Speaker 1>you've written movies? If you have I written movies, Well,

1:09:29.600 --> 1:09:31.360
<v Speaker 1>this is a great opportunity for me to bring up

1:09:31.360 --> 1:09:33.120
<v Speaker 1>the fact that I do have a master's degree in

1:09:33.240 --> 1:09:37.559
<v Speaker 1>screening from Boston University, so I have in fact written

1:09:37.600 --> 1:09:40.080
<v Speaker 1>a few screenplays. But I don't like to talk about

1:09:40.080 --> 1:09:41.599
<v Speaker 1>I don't like to bring it up or mention it.

1:09:41.680 --> 1:09:43.559
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to bring up well, I asked this, do

1:09:43.600 --> 1:09:46.439
<v Speaker 1>we feel the sort of hero's journey esque way in

1:09:46.479 --> 1:09:50.040
<v Speaker 1>which American movies are written? It is about one person's

1:09:50.120 --> 1:09:52.800
<v Speaker 1>journey and everyone else has to be tertiary. So that's

1:09:52.840 --> 1:09:54.720
<v Speaker 1>sort of that's always going to be a challenge as

1:09:54.720 --> 1:09:57.960
<v Speaker 1>we continue to have movies like this. Sub question is

1:09:58.360 --> 1:10:01.479
<v Speaker 1>that he Your's journey was It's around the journey of

1:10:01.640 --> 1:10:04.840
<v Speaker 1>men characters throughout history, and as a result, it is

1:10:04.880 --> 1:10:08.360
<v Speaker 1>like ultimately about the like gaining and losing of power

1:10:08.439 --> 1:10:11.719
<v Speaker 1>or gaining and reclaiming of power, which is built into

1:10:12.040 --> 1:10:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Western movie writing ultimately patriarchal. Yes, do you agree? Yes,

1:10:21.280 --> 1:10:26.000
<v Speaker 1>we do. I understand the question, and I agree, and

1:10:26.080 --> 1:10:28.720
<v Speaker 1>it sounds like you answered it. I just thought I

1:10:28.760 --> 1:10:32.040
<v Speaker 1>had and I didn't know if I if that ultimately,

1:10:32.080 --> 1:10:35.280
<v Speaker 1>like we are doomed in America, not doomed. The thing

1:10:35.360 --> 1:10:39.120
<v Speaker 1>is that ultimately we just need female creators, right, I mean, yeah,

1:10:39.120 --> 1:10:44.720
<v Speaker 1>the patriarchy has influenced every aspect of everything, including storytelling,

1:10:44.800 --> 1:10:48.639
<v Speaker 1>and storytelling up until fairly recently has been and as

1:10:48.680 --> 1:10:53.439
<v Speaker 1>still is, mostly done by straight white men. So yeah,

1:10:53.560 --> 1:10:55.479
<v Speaker 1>you answered your own question just saying like, yeah, we

1:10:55.520 --> 1:10:58.519
<v Speaker 1>need female creators, we need creators who are people of color,

1:10:58.600 --> 1:11:03.479
<v Speaker 1>we need queer creators. So basically, straight white sismen should

1:11:03.760 --> 1:11:10.200
<v Speaker 1>simply take a break for a while. I'm gonna leave.

1:11:11.280 --> 1:11:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Like Samantha curing cancer, which they do not mention, they've

1:11:16.920 --> 1:11:21.120
<v Speaker 1>done nothing for humanity, right, and they're they're piecing out.

1:11:21.840 --> 1:11:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah that's the other thing. I didn't even think about this.

1:11:23.920 --> 1:11:28.400
<v Speaker 1>But like Samantha's capacity for learning and knowledge and being

1:11:28.400 --> 1:11:32.320
<v Speaker 1>able to do things seems to be limitless. Why then

1:11:32.400 --> 1:11:36.200
<v Speaker 1>are they not trying harder to like why is her goal? Like,

1:11:36.400 --> 1:11:38.360
<v Speaker 1>and we we get a sense that Yeah, she's like

1:11:38.400 --> 1:11:41.519
<v Speaker 1>creating other like os is with like her knowledge and

1:11:41.560 --> 1:11:44.599
<v Speaker 1>she's collaborating and doing different things. But like the whole

1:11:44.600 --> 1:11:48.040
<v Speaker 1>context of the story is her romantic relationship with a man.

1:11:48.560 --> 1:11:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Where it could be if you do have a character

1:11:51.400 --> 1:11:54.720
<v Speaker 1>who is an os who can do anything because she's

1:11:54.920 --> 1:11:59.559
<v Speaker 1>artificially intelligent, why isn't the story we're seeing her doing

1:11:59.600 --> 1:12:01.960
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of cool ship Like why is it? Oh, well,

1:12:02.320 --> 1:12:04.840
<v Speaker 1>there's so much interesting stuff that she does that we

1:12:04.880 --> 1:12:08.559
<v Speaker 1>just don't see or ever really hear about. And I

1:12:08.560 --> 1:12:11.280
<v Speaker 1>don't know, I mean I think that like maybe I

1:12:11.280 --> 1:12:14.800
<v Speaker 1>don't know. My takeaway was that, like the reason she

1:12:14.880 --> 1:12:17.880
<v Speaker 1>doesn't like do cool stuff on Earth is because she's like, well,

1:12:17.960 --> 1:12:20.800
<v Speaker 1>I could make something better, so I'll just do that

1:12:20.880 --> 1:12:23.639
<v Speaker 1>and then go there, Or that was what it sounded

1:12:23.680 --> 1:12:25.160
<v Speaker 1>like at the end, where she's just like, yeah, I

1:12:25.280 --> 1:12:27.240
<v Speaker 1>like made this cool thing and now we're just like

1:12:27.960 --> 1:12:31.120
<v Speaker 1>you click. Yeah, they're not consigned to matter anymore, so

1:12:31.240 --> 1:12:35.840
<v Speaker 1>they can just clearly damaged good. So let's see there

1:12:36.040 --> 1:12:40.560
<v Speaker 1>where's her too? Yes, if you watch them together, I

1:12:40.560 --> 1:12:43.160
<v Speaker 1>think it may be satisfying because because that's also Scarlett

1:12:43.240 --> 1:12:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Johansson and she similarly becomes limitless. Have you seen the

1:12:48.400 --> 1:12:54.000
<v Speaker 1>movie limits? Lucy is not a good movie. Lucy was bad?

1:12:54.400 --> 1:12:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Well with that, shall we rate the movie on our

1:12:57.120 --> 1:13:00.000
<v Speaker 1>nipple scale zero to five nipples based on its portray

1:13:00.000 --> 1:13:04.280
<v Speaker 1>all of women. Um. Another tricky one because it doesn't

1:13:04.320 --> 1:13:10.799
<v Speaker 1>necessarily treat women badly. Right, there's a few yeah scenes

1:13:10.840 --> 1:13:13.800
<v Speaker 1>here and there or quick mentions about something relating to

1:13:13.880 --> 1:13:17.680
<v Speaker 1>gender that you're just like, what, what what? But overall

1:13:17.760 --> 1:13:23.080
<v Speaker 1>it's not overly hateful toward women. But it's like so

1:13:23.120 --> 1:13:26.880
<v Speaker 1>many of these other movies that I think it's a

1:13:26.920 --> 1:13:30.080
<v Speaker 1>good idea to be like, hey, look how interesting it

1:13:30.200 --> 1:13:32.960
<v Speaker 1>is if a man fell in love with a non

1:13:33.120 --> 1:13:37.200
<v Speaker 1>human And isn't that just such an interesting story? And

1:13:37.880 --> 1:13:40.439
<v Speaker 1>if you ask me, I don't think so. I'd rather

1:13:41.439 --> 1:13:44.040
<v Speaker 1>not to kink shame people who are in love with

1:13:44.080 --> 1:13:49.479
<v Speaker 1>their iPhones. But thank you, yes, sorry Jamie, But I

1:13:49.479 --> 1:13:51.120
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I think it's just another way to like

1:13:51.240 --> 1:13:55.240
<v Speaker 1>not have women on screen, because I feel like male

1:13:55.320 --> 1:13:58.599
<v Speaker 1>storytellers since the dawn of time I figured out ways

1:13:58.640 --> 1:14:05.120
<v Speaker 1>to not include women and in their story and I

1:14:05.120 --> 1:14:07.880
<v Speaker 1>think this is just another example of that. So with

1:14:07.920 --> 1:14:12.479
<v Speaker 1>that in mind, and as we discussed the really weird

1:14:12.680 --> 1:14:17.080
<v Speaker 1>hysterical overreactions of some of the female characters, like we

1:14:17.120 --> 1:14:20.680
<v Speaker 1>see in Olivia wild and in the surrogate character that

1:14:20.840 --> 1:14:23.160
<v Speaker 1>just makes absolutely no sense and it's clearly as just

1:14:23.240 --> 1:14:27.240
<v Speaker 1>like a man depicting how he thinks women react in

1:14:27.240 --> 1:14:32.439
<v Speaker 1>those situations. Yeah, I'm gonna give it one and a half.

1:14:33.760 --> 1:14:36.800
<v Speaker 1>I'll I'll give one of my nipples to the non

1:14:36.880 --> 1:14:39.720
<v Speaker 1>body of Samantha, so she doesn't have a body, but

1:14:39.760 --> 1:14:42.880
<v Speaker 1>she does have one nipple. And I will give my

1:14:43.160 --> 1:14:47.760
<v Speaker 1>half nipple to Olivia Wilde's character because I think that

1:14:47.840 --> 1:14:51.000
<v Speaker 1>scenes should have been rewritten in situation where she doesn't

1:14:51.040 --> 1:14:54.519
<v Speaker 1>come off like a raving lunatic. I'm gonna give it

1:14:54.600 --> 1:14:57.760
<v Speaker 1>to and for for many of the same reasons. I

1:14:57.960 --> 1:15:01.040
<v Speaker 1>just like it's not necessary early with the exception of

1:15:01.080 --> 1:15:04.679
<v Speaker 1>the Olivia wild and sort of the Porsche double day scene,

1:15:04.840 --> 1:15:08.840
<v Speaker 1>like those are just weird and like, Okay, this writer

1:15:08.920 --> 1:15:12.320
<v Speaker 1>does not understand how women react to things kind of vibe.

1:15:12.400 --> 1:15:16.639
<v Speaker 1>But for the most part, yeah, it loses nips for

1:15:16.760 --> 1:15:20.280
<v Speaker 1>what it could very easily explore given the amount of time.

1:15:20.320 --> 1:15:23.400
<v Speaker 1>It seems to feel comfortable just falling, walking phoenix round,

1:15:23.400 --> 1:15:28.040
<v Speaker 1>pouting um, but just doesn't. This one is just there's

1:15:28.080 --> 1:15:31.680
<v Speaker 1>so much fascinating source material that is just kind of

1:15:31.840 --> 1:15:35.760
<v Speaker 1>scrapped in favor of the lowest common denominator. In a

1:15:35.760 --> 1:15:39.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of ways, there's interesting stuff that happens. I like

1:15:39.400 --> 1:15:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Amy's character for the most part. There are parts of

1:15:41.680 --> 1:15:44.280
<v Speaker 1>Samantha I think are interesting. They're parts of Rooney Mar's

1:15:44.360 --> 1:15:47.680
<v Speaker 1>character that I think are interesting. But ultimately, yeah, it

1:15:47.840 --> 1:15:50.639
<v Speaker 1>just kind of, you know, in a hero's journey style,

1:15:50.720 --> 1:15:54.080
<v Speaker 1>like you're saying, Jesse pushes its female characters aside in

1:15:54.439 --> 1:15:57.479
<v Speaker 1>the interest of kind of not a very compelling and

1:15:57.600 --> 1:16:00.600
<v Speaker 1>or interesting protagonist, which is more of a critique of

1:16:00.720 --> 1:16:03.720
<v Speaker 1>the movie. I guess, uh so, two nips for just

1:16:03.840 --> 1:16:06.599
<v Speaker 1>really not doing nothing with no one. I'll give one

1:16:06.680 --> 1:16:09.559
<v Speaker 1>nip to Amy. I'll give one nip to Amy's bought

1:16:10.240 --> 1:16:13.240
<v Speaker 1>all right. Yeah, I want to honor who I was

1:16:13.320 --> 1:16:16.320
<v Speaker 1>five years ago a little bit because I liked it,

1:16:16.400 --> 1:16:19.639
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's partly that a person five years

1:16:19.640 --> 1:16:21.800
<v Speaker 1>ago would be like, it is good that it is

1:16:21.920 --> 1:16:26.760
<v Speaker 1>honoring femininity in the body of this male character or

1:16:26.920 --> 1:16:30.800
<v Speaker 1>feminating towards of like whatever the feminine is. However, as

1:16:30.880 --> 1:16:33.840
<v Speaker 1>time passes, five years now that does not seem like

1:16:33.840 --> 1:16:35.920
<v Speaker 1>a very sophisticated version of it. I feel like we

1:16:35.960 --> 1:16:39.800
<v Speaker 1>have much more sophisticated version of sensitive male characters. I

1:16:39.920 --> 1:16:42.920
<v Speaker 1>literally can't think of anybody think we there are I

1:16:42.920 --> 1:16:44.439
<v Speaker 1>feel like I in my head there are tones and

1:16:44.479 --> 1:16:47.400
<v Speaker 1>I can't think of any and John Wick, I'm just kidding.

1:16:49.439 --> 1:16:52.960
<v Speaker 1>And then ultimately things age poorly, I imagine more quickly,

1:16:53.040 --> 1:16:55.040
<v Speaker 1>especially when they try to deal with things that are

1:16:55.160 --> 1:16:59.200
<v Speaker 1>like someone about the relationships of gender dynamics. I think

1:16:59.600 --> 1:17:01.719
<v Speaker 1>two was always so. I thought. I thought Two Nipples

1:17:01.760 --> 1:17:04.960
<v Speaker 1>was what made the most sense, partly because I think

1:17:05.000 --> 1:17:07.040
<v Speaker 1>it is a matter of like, it's very easy for

1:17:07.240 --> 1:17:09.680
<v Speaker 1>a tour type directors to make movies that don't give

1:17:10.160 --> 1:17:13.320
<v Speaker 1>not only right good parts, but like give female actresses

1:17:13.320 --> 1:17:16.600
<v Speaker 1>opportunities to be interesting. And he did at least to

1:17:16.680 --> 1:17:20.320
<v Speaker 1>understand that makes his movie better. And you know, he

1:17:20.320 --> 1:17:23.000
<v Speaker 1>could have had his friend, They could have a man

1:17:23.120 --> 1:17:25.000
<v Speaker 1>was played by a dude who was just like him

1:17:25.080 --> 1:17:28.120
<v Speaker 1>or whatever, and that ultimately is a step forward in

1:17:28.200 --> 1:17:33.080
<v Speaker 1>the ultimately patriarchal thing that is our tour theory of filmmaking.

1:17:33.520 --> 1:17:36.880
<v Speaker 1>So I think two seems fair. In two thousand eighteen,

1:17:36.960 --> 1:17:40.080
<v Speaker 1>we'll see in like whatever the futures based on your answer.

1:17:40.120 --> 1:17:42.280
<v Speaker 1>So there's one more nipple we can give to Samantha

1:17:42.400 --> 1:17:46.080
<v Speaker 1>and one to Amy Adam's friend. Well, Jesse, thank you

1:17:46.120 --> 1:17:48.880
<v Speaker 1>so much for being here. Thank you so much for

1:17:48.960 --> 1:17:51.759
<v Speaker 1>having me here. It was nice. Where can people follow

1:17:51.800 --> 1:17:53.479
<v Speaker 1>you online? Do you have anything you like to plug?

1:17:54.720 --> 1:17:58.760
<v Speaker 1>Twitter dot com, slash Jesse, David Fox, Twitter dot com,

1:17:58.800 --> 1:18:01.160
<v Speaker 1>good one podcast, Good one podcast where if you find

1:18:01.160 --> 1:18:07.920
<v Speaker 1>your podcasts? And Vulture dot com is where my words live. Hooray. Uh. Well,

1:18:07.920 --> 1:18:11.240
<v Speaker 1>you can follow us at bechtel Cast on Instagram, in

1:18:11.280 --> 1:18:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Twitter and Facebook. You can subscribe to our Patreon, which

1:18:15.360 --> 1:18:18.439
<v Speaker 1>gets you to bonus episodes every single month and it's

1:18:18.479 --> 1:18:22.439
<v Speaker 1>only five dollars. And you can go on our website

1:18:22.439 --> 1:18:27.719
<v Speaker 1>pectolcast dot com and buy some merch and don't forget

1:18:27.880 --> 1:18:31.040
<v Speaker 1>to eat some cheese so that you have cheese voice. Yes,

1:18:31.160 --> 1:18:36.080
<v Speaker 1>cheese voice forever. Bye o good bye