WEBVTT - Tech News: AI Getting Armed and More Dangerous

0:00:04.440 --> 0:00:12.319
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from iHeartRadio. Hey there,

0:00:12.360 --> 0:00:16.120
<v Speaker 1>and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host Jonathan Strickland,

0:00:16.120 --> 0:00:19.360
<v Speaker 1>Diamond Executive producer with iHeartRadio and how the tech are you.

0:00:19.920 --> 0:00:25.080
<v Speaker 1>It's time for the tech news for Tuesday, August twenty ninth,

0:00:25.600 --> 0:00:28.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty three. We got a lot of heavy talk

0:00:29.040 --> 0:00:33.559
<v Speaker 1>about AI to get through today. First up, US Senator

0:00:33.680 --> 0:00:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Chuck Schumer will host an insight forum focused on AI

0:00:38.800 --> 0:00:42.839
<v Speaker 1>on September thirteenth. His office has confirmed there will be

0:00:43.120 --> 0:00:47.120
<v Speaker 1>several important folks in tech who are present at this event.

0:00:47.840 --> 0:00:51.880
<v Speaker 1>One of those is Elon Musk, who co founded open

0:00:51.920 --> 0:00:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Ai before he left that organization to go make his

0:00:55.040 --> 0:00:59.960
<v Speaker 1>own AI development team with Blackjack and well never mind.

0:01:00.600 --> 0:01:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Another is Mark Zuckerberg, which makes me wonder if Schumer

0:01:04.480 --> 0:01:07.960
<v Speaker 1>is prepared to keep Musk and Zuckerberg apart, since you

0:01:08.040 --> 0:01:11.000
<v Speaker 1>never know when they'll revert back to being high school

0:01:11.080 --> 0:01:15.480
<v Speaker 1>alpha male types and starts scrapping in the hallway between classes.

0:01:16.280 --> 0:01:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Eric Schmidt is also supposed to be there. He was

0:01:18.720 --> 0:01:23.319
<v Speaker 1>the former CEO of Google. Sundar Pichai, who is the

0:01:23.400 --> 0:01:26.840
<v Speaker 1>current CEO of Alphabet, which is Google's parent company. He's

0:01:26.880 --> 0:01:30.319
<v Speaker 1>going to be there, and of course Sam Altman, the

0:01:30.319 --> 0:01:33.840
<v Speaker 1>CEO of Open AI itself, will take part in this,

0:01:34.400 --> 0:01:37.319
<v Speaker 1>and the conversation is going to be a lot around

0:01:37.400 --> 0:01:41.320
<v Speaker 1>like the risks and benefits of AI and the development

0:01:41.480 --> 0:01:46.839
<v Speaker 1>of a US policy on regulating artificial intelligence. Now, these

0:01:46.840 --> 0:01:48.640
<v Speaker 1>folks are not going to be the only ones there,

0:01:48.720 --> 0:01:51.800
<v Speaker 1>which is a good thing, because if the only folks

0:01:51.960 --> 0:01:54.680
<v Speaker 1>at the table happen to be the ones who are

0:01:54.760 --> 0:01:58.880
<v Speaker 1>eager to avoid as much regulation as possible, you probably

0:01:58.920 --> 0:02:02.000
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't make a whole lot of progress. Schumer's office says

0:02:02.040 --> 0:02:05.760
<v Speaker 1>that there will be representatives from civil rights groups and

0:02:05.960 --> 0:02:09.000
<v Speaker 1>worker advocacy groups and creatives and that sort of thing

0:02:09.000 --> 0:02:12.920
<v Speaker 1>as well. The proceedings themselves will actually be done behind

0:02:13.000 --> 0:02:16.680
<v Speaker 1>closed doors, so there won't be any reporters allowed inside

0:02:16.760 --> 0:02:19.359
<v Speaker 1>while this is going on, but Schumer says his office

0:02:19.400 --> 0:02:22.840
<v Speaker 1>will release essentially a summary of what went on during

0:02:22.880 --> 0:02:27.160
<v Speaker 1>the discussions. I suspect the tech executives will do their

0:02:27.200 --> 0:02:32.960
<v Speaker 1>best to reduce any impact of proposed regulations because otherwise

0:02:33.000 --> 0:02:36.040
<v Speaker 1>that kind of affects their bottom line. Now, I do

0:02:36.160 --> 0:02:39.960
<v Speaker 1>think a serious discussion about artificial intelligence does need to

0:02:39.960 --> 0:02:42.880
<v Speaker 1>happen as soon as possible, and I don't just mean

0:02:43.280 --> 0:02:46.920
<v Speaker 1>generative AI. That gets a lot of headlines, but it

0:02:47.000 --> 0:02:51.120
<v Speaker 1>is not the one and only application of artificial intelligence

0:02:51.160 --> 0:02:54.959
<v Speaker 1>by far. For example, according to Jared Keller, who was

0:02:55.000 --> 0:03:00.000
<v Speaker 1>writing for Military dot Com, the US Army will potentially

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:03.080
<v Speaker 1>they soon conduct tests in which they will mount the

0:03:03.240 --> 0:03:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Army's new sig sour x seven squad rifle to a

0:03:07.800 --> 0:03:12.280
<v Speaker 1>four legged robot provided by Ghost Robotics. The Army already

0:03:12.320 --> 0:03:16.000
<v Speaker 1>did a similar test with a robot from Ghost Robotics,

0:03:16.360 --> 0:03:19.160
<v Speaker 1>and they used an m for a one carbine in

0:03:19.200 --> 0:03:23.160
<v Speaker 1>those tests. Representatives for the Army have said these tests

0:03:23.200 --> 0:03:28.320
<v Speaker 1>are to explore human machine interaction in Army operations, but

0:03:28.400 --> 0:03:31.600
<v Speaker 1>they do not necessarily indicate that there is a plan

0:03:31.919 --> 0:03:35.600
<v Speaker 1>for these robots to be quote unquote deployed down range.

0:03:36.360 --> 0:03:39.760
<v Speaker 1>That is, the Army might test the stuff out, but

0:03:39.800 --> 0:03:43.320
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't necessarily mean that in the not two distant future,

0:03:43.480 --> 0:03:47.240
<v Speaker 1>four legged robots armed with machine guns will be blasting

0:03:47.240 --> 0:03:50.960
<v Speaker 1>their way through combat zones. So let's just test chill out.

0:03:51.640 --> 0:03:55.640
<v Speaker 1>Critics have repeatedly voiced concerns about arming semi autonomous and

0:03:55.680 --> 0:04:00.760
<v Speaker 1>remotely controlled devices, arguing that can lead to conflict escalation

0:04:01.560 --> 0:04:04.200
<v Speaker 1>and that the act of ending a human life should

0:04:04.240 --> 0:04:09.000
<v Speaker 1>be entirely up to another human, which, y'all, I understand

0:04:09.000 --> 0:04:11.400
<v Speaker 1>that on one hand, but it's really messed up to

0:04:11.440 --> 0:04:15.080
<v Speaker 1>think about it, right, Like, no, this should be left

0:04:15.080 --> 0:04:17.320
<v Speaker 1>to a person who will then be left to try

0:04:17.360 --> 0:04:19.839
<v Speaker 1>and deal with that trauma. But at the same time

0:04:19.960 --> 0:04:22.080
<v Speaker 1>you think, well, sure it should be up to a

0:04:22.120 --> 0:04:27.040
<v Speaker 1>person and not just automated, because that is really super

0:04:27.160 --> 0:04:30.640
<v Speaker 1>dark and grim. But then I am admittedly a hippie

0:04:30.680 --> 0:04:33.919
<v Speaker 1>dippy type who isn't so big on the concept of

0:04:34.040 --> 0:04:37.520
<v Speaker 1>ending human lives in the first place. Anyway. It's not

0:04:37.560 --> 0:04:41.520
<v Speaker 1>just human rights advocates who have voiced concerns. Several robotics companies,

0:04:41.520 --> 0:04:46.760
<v Speaker 1>including famously Boston Dynamics, have protested the move to weaponize

0:04:46.800 --> 0:04:50.039
<v Speaker 1>the technologies that they work on. Last year, those companies

0:04:50.040 --> 0:04:53.960
<v Speaker 1>released an open letter that in part reads, quote, we

0:04:54.080 --> 0:04:57.000
<v Speaker 1>believe that adding weapons to robots that are remotely or

0:04:57.040 --> 0:05:01.240
<v Speaker 1>autonomously operated, widely available to the public, and capable of

0:05:01.320 --> 0:05:05.200
<v Speaker 1>navigating to previously inaccessible locations where people live and work

0:05:05.760 --> 0:05:10.880
<v Speaker 1>raises new risks of harm and serious ethical issues. Weaponized

0:05:10.880 --> 0:05:14.640
<v Speaker 1>applications of these newly capable robots will also harm public

0:05:14.680 --> 0:05:18.240
<v Speaker 1>trust in the technology in ways that damage the tremendous

0:05:18.240 --> 0:05:22.880
<v Speaker 1>benefits they will bring to society end quote. Obviously, this

0:05:22.920 --> 0:05:25.800
<v Speaker 1>has not stopped the US Army and other nations are

0:05:25.839 --> 0:05:30.320
<v Speaker 1>similarly experimenting with weaponized robotic platforms. So I guess you

0:05:30.360 --> 0:05:34.760
<v Speaker 1>could say that unless everyone around the world agrees to

0:05:34.839 --> 0:05:37.960
<v Speaker 1>back off on doing this and then actually follows through

0:05:38.000 --> 0:05:41.160
<v Speaker 1>on that promise, the only other option you have is

0:05:41.200 --> 0:05:44.680
<v Speaker 1>to develop the stuff yourself, which again is pretty grim.

0:05:45.120 --> 0:05:49.400
<v Speaker 1>But wait, it gets even scarier. So not to be outdone,

0:05:49.880 --> 0:05:53.640
<v Speaker 1>the US Air Force is seeking a research budget to

0:05:53.680 --> 0:05:58.279
<v Speaker 1>build at least a thousand unmanned aircraft that can operate

0:05:58.360 --> 0:06:03.479
<v Speaker 1>autonomously and I'm talking being weaponized aircraft. These vehicles would

0:06:03.480 --> 0:06:07.160
<v Speaker 1>serve as wingmen to human pilots and would provide support

0:06:07.279 --> 0:06:10.680
<v Speaker 1>and cover during combat operations. They could also be sent

0:06:10.760 --> 0:06:14.400
<v Speaker 1>on suicide missions to achieve combat goals in scenarios where

0:06:14.400 --> 0:06:18.320
<v Speaker 1>the possibility of survival is approaching zero. As such, the

0:06:18.360 --> 0:06:22.120
<v Speaker 1>aircraft would need to be autonomous and armed. One candidate

0:06:22.200 --> 0:06:25.320
<v Speaker 1>for the vehicle that the Air Force could potentially use

0:06:25.360 --> 0:06:29.480
<v Speaker 1>in this program comes from a company called Kratos Defense.

0:06:29.680 --> 0:06:32.080
<v Speaker 1>It actually makes me wonder if the company chose that

0:06:32.200 --> 0:06:35.080
<v Speaker 1>name after the character from the God of War franchise.

0:06:35.960 --> 0:06:37.719
<v Speaker 1>That game came out in two thousand and five, and

0:06:37.760 --> 0:06:40.880
<v Speaker 1>the company that is now known as Kratos Defense actually

0:06:41.000 --> 0:06:44.479
<v Speaker 1>chose that name in two thousand and seven, two years

0:06:44.520 --> 0:06:48.920
<v Speaker 1>after the game came out. If that's the case, yikes. Anyway,

0:06:48.960 --> 0:06:53.320
<v Speaker 1>the platform itself is called Valkyrie, which is really another yikes.

0:06:54.080 --> 0:06:58.279
<v Speaker 1>Valkyrie were Odin's war maidens who would escort fallen warriors

0:06:58.279 --> 0:07:02.200
<v Speaker 1>to Valhalla. Force has been using the Valkyrie aircraft as

0:07:02.240 --> 0:07:05.760
<v Speaker 1>a support platform for connectivity purposes, essentially acting like a

0:07:05.800 --> 0:07:10.800
<v Speaker 1>network bridge between other aircraft and other autonomous vehicles that

0:07:10.880 --> 0:07:14.400
<v Speaker 1>are under Air Force control. But current plans involve using

0:07:14.440 --> 0:07:17.880
<v Speaker 1>a Valkyrie in a simulation to identify, chase, down, and

0:07:17.920 --> 0:07:21.720
<v Speaker 1>then take down a target over the Gulf of Mexico

0:07:22.480 --> 0:07:26.560
<v Speaker 1>in in a test of its capabilities, which is a

0:07:26.560 --> 0:07:30.240
<v Speaker 1>triple yikes really, as you can imagine. Critics have protested

0:07:30.240 --> 0:07:33.320
<v Speaker 1>this initiative as well, with the same sort of arguments

0:07:33.320 --> 0:07:36.040
<v Speaker 1>that they make for the four legged robots being armed

0:07:36.040 --> 0:07:38.600
<v Speaker 1>by the army, But the Air Force will be requesting

0:07:38.640 --> 0:07:41.520
<v Speaker 1>a nearly six billion dollar budget to pursue this plan

0:07:41.640 --> 0:07:46.040
<v Speaker 1>over the course of the next five years. Today is

0:07:46.080 --> 0:07:49.400
<v Speaker 1>the first day of Google's Cloud Next conference, an event

0:07:49.440 --> 0:07:52.360
<v Speaker 1>where AI will be one of many topics under discussion.

0:07:52.800 --> 0:07:57.160
<v Speaker 1>Google will launch an interesting tool at this conference called Synthid.

0:07:58.000 --> 0:08:02.200
<v Speaker 1>This tool applies a watermark to AI generated images. The

0:08:02.240 --> 0:08:05.280
<v Speaker 1>watermark is meant to be unnoticed by human eyes, so

0:08:05.320 --> 0:08:06.720
<v Speaker 1>when you look at the picture, you don't see that

0:08:06.760 --> 0:08:09.360
<v Speaker 1>there's a watermark there, but it's meant to be easily

0:08:09.400 --> 0:08:13.840
<v Speaker 1>detectable with any AI detection tool, which is pretty clever.

0:08:14.240 --> 0:08:16.960
<v Speaker 1>The watermark won't affect how we perceive the image, but

0:08:17.040 --> 0:08:19.720
<v Speaker 1>will also reveal itself to be the product of AI generation,

0:08:20.240 --> 0:08:22.880
<v Speaker 1>and Google says the watermark's design is such that you

0:08:22.960 --> 0:08:25.240
<v Speaker 1>could edit the image, You could crop it, you could

0:08:25.320 --> 0:08:28.440
<v Speaker 1>deform it, stretch it in various ways, and the watermarks

0:08:28.440 --> 0:08:32.040
<v Speaker 1>should be unaffected. Google engineers haven't gone into a lot

0:08:32.040 --> 0:08:34.120
<v Speaker 1>of detail about how this works because they don't want

0:08:34.120 --> 0:08:37.160
<v Speaker 1>to tip their hand too much lest folks immediately find

0:08:37.200 --> 0:08:39.439
<v Speaker 1>ways to gain the system and get around the tool.

0:08:39.760 --> 0:08:42.400
<v Speaker 1>But they have also said that this is really just

0:08:42.440 --> 0:08:45.400
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of Synthid. This tool is going to face

0:08:45.480 --> 0:08:48.920
<v Speaker 1>real world tests. People will find ways around it. Like,

0:08:49.000 --> 0:08:51.920
<v Speaker 1>that's just a fact, and the engineers at Google are

0:08:51.920 --> 0:08:55.040
<v Speaker 1>saying this, and that's going to prompt changes and improvements

0:08:55.040 --> 0:08:57.600
<v Speaker 1>on Google side, and that's just how things work. It's

0:08:57.679 --> 0:09:01.280
<v Speaker 1>essentially the exact same pattern we saw with captures. There

0:09:01.320 --> 0:09:03.760
<v Speaker 1>are lots of reasons that you would want to employ

0:09:03.840 --> 0:09:06.680
<v Speaker 1>a tool like this, ranging from everything from preventing the

0:09:06.720 --> 0:09:10.640
<v Speaker 1>spread of misinformation with deep fakes to avoiding the problem

0:09:10.640 --> 0:09:14.040
<v Speaker 1>of just mixing up images of actual real world things

0:09:14.559 --> 0:09:17.160
<v Speaker 1>with AI generated images of stuff that may or may

0:09:17.200 --> 0:09:20.280
<v Speaker 1>not exist. So there are a lot of different practical

0:09:20.320 --> 0:09:22.640
<v Speaker 1>applications for this technology. I'm sure we'll hear a lot

0:09:22.679 --> 0:09:26.600
<v Speaker 1>more about it as the Cloud Next conference continues. General

0:09:26.640 --> 0:09:29.679
<v Speaker 1>motors will be talking more about how it is using

0:09:29.679 --> 0:09:35.120
<v Speaker 1>conversational AI as the Cloud Next Conference continues, specifically with

0:09:35.240 --> 0:09:38.280
<v Speaker 1>the on Star service. So on Star is a connected

0:09:38.320 --> 0:09:41.360
<v Speaker 1>feature built into some vehicles that lets the driver get

0:09:41.400 --> 0:09:46.640
<v Speaker 1>support for all sorts of things ranging from the quasi

0:09:46.720 --> 0:09:51.000
<v Speaker 1>trivial to the very serious. GM is using conversational AI

0:09:51.120 --> 0:09:55.080
<v Speaker 1>to handle the more mundane, low urgency requests. You know,

0:09:55.120 --> 0:09:57.520
<v Speaker 1>like if you want to use on Star to help

0:09:57.600 --> 0:10:01.439
<v Speaker 1>guide you in navigating to your final destination in your

0:10:01.480 --> 0:10:03.760
<v Speaker 1>car that doesn't have to be a human being to

0:10:03.880 --> 0:10:08.400
<v Speaker 1>actually manage that. That could be an AI agent helping

0:10:08.440 --> 0:10:11.360
<v Speaker 1>you with that task. For stuff that's more important, like

0:10:11.400 --> 0:10:16.280
<v Speaker 1>reporting a crash or asking that you know someone like

0:10:16.720 --> 0:10:20.160
<v Speaker 1>an EMT be sent to your location, those calls get

0:10:20.200 --> 0:10:24.800
<v Speaker 1>routed to human operators, which is totally understandable, and by

0:10:24.840 --> 0:10:28.840
<v Speaker 1>offloading the low urgency stuff to AI, GM says it

0:10:28.880 --> 0:10:31.240
<v Speaker 1>has decreased the weight time to get in touch with

0:10:31.360 --> 0:10:33.880
<v Speaker 1>human operators, and obviously that's a good thing if you

0:10:34.000 --> 0:10:35.920
<v Speaker 1>really need to speak to someone in the event of

0:10:35.960 --> 0:10:39.280
<v Speaker 1>an emergency. According to GM, the response to the AI

0:10:39.320 --> 0:10:43.120
<v Speaker 1>assistance has been mostly positive among drivers, and this is

0:10:43.160 --> 0:10:45.520
<v Speaker 1>the kind of implementation I can really get behind, using

0:10:45.559 --> 0:10:49.040
<v Speaker 1>AI to offload less important tasks so that people with

0:10:49.120 --> 0:10:52.199
<v Speaker 1>specialized knowledge and training can handle the more important ones,

0:10:52.240 --> 0:10:57.120
<v Speaker 1>particularly ones that benefit from a human touch. Okay, we've

0:10:57.160 --> 0:10:59.040
<v Speaker 1>got a lot more news stories to go, but let's

0:10:59.080 --> 0:11:11.760
<v Speaker 1>take a quick break. Okay, we're back, and next up,

0:11:11.800 --> 0:11:15.120
<v Speaker 1>we've got another story with artificial intelligence, along with some

0:11:15.400 --> 0:11:19.439
<v Speaker 1>arguably dumb real behavior. At least in my opinion, it's

0:11:19.480 --> 0:11:23.760
<v Speaker 1>pretty dumb. So Elon Musk, owner of x formerly known

0:11:23.760 --> 0:11:27.800
<v Speaker 1>as Twitter, and the CEO of Tesla, live streamed a

0:11:27.840 --> 0:11:33.199
<v Speaker 1>demonstration of Tesla's upcoming full self driving Version twelve software

0:11:33.760 --> 0:11:36.359
<v Speaker 1>with him sitting in the driver's seat of a Tesla.

0:11:36.840 --> 0:11:38.920
<v Speaker 1>This version of full self driving has yet to be

0:11:39.000 --> 0:11:43.079
<v Speaker 1>released to Tesla owners, and during the demo, Musk broke

0:11:43.120 --> 0:11:46.520
<v Speaker 1>a California law which says you're not supposed to have

0:11:46.559 --> 0:11:49.360
<v Speaker 1>a phone in your hand while you're operating a vehicle.

0:11:50.280 --> 0:11:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk definitely did do that. Follow up on that,

0:11:53.600 --> 0:11:57.199
<v Speaker 1>police are not going to pursue Musk for this because

0:11:57.200 --> 0:12:01.400
<v Speaker 1>no police officer directly witnessed it happening. That's a prerequisite

0:12:01.440 --> 0:12:04.320
<v Speaker 1>for charging someone if it's just a video or whatever.

0:12:04.679 --> 0:12:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Cops did not see it at the time, they will

0:12:07.120 --> 0:12:10.439
<v Speaker 1>not go after Musk. Plus, even if they did, the

0:12:10.559 --> 0:12:12.880
<v Speaker 1>penalty for your first offense can be as low as

0:12:12.880 --> 0:12:16.120
<v Speaker 1>a twenty dollars fine, so it's not like it wouldn't

0:12:16.160 --> 0:12:21.439
<v Speaker 1>mean anything. Also, Musk was technically violating Tesla's own policies

0:12:21.840 --> 0:12:24.640
<v Speaker 1>because the company says that full self driving is a

0:12:24.800 --> 0:12:27.240
<v Speaker 1>hands on feature and that drivers are supposed to keep

0:12:27.280 --> 0:12:29.920
<v Speaker 1>their hands on the steering wheel at all times, and

0:12:30.040 --> 0:12:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk definitively did not do that, so he was

0:12:34.000 --> 0:12:37.040
<v Speaker 1>defying his own company's policies. But anyway, let's put all

0:12:37.080 --> 0:12:41.360
<v Speaker 1>that aside for now. During this demonstration, at one point,

0:12:41.840 --> 0:12:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Musk actually had to take control of the Tesla to

0:12:44.880 --> 0:12:47.760
<v Speaker 1>prevent it from running a red light. That's not a

0:12:47.760 --> 0:12:51.200
<v Speaker 1>great moment when you're demonstrating the supposed full self driving

0:12:51.240 --> 0:12:55.280
<v Speaker 1>capability of your vehicle. Musk also used Google to look

0:12:55.360 --> 0:12:58.760
<v Speaker 1>up Mark Zuckerberg's address and then showed it on camera,

0:12:59.000 --> 0:13:02.440
<v Speaker 1>but he said that doesn't to doxing anyone because you

0:13:02.480 --> 0:13:05.320
<v Speaker 1>could just google the way he did. To be fair

0:13:05.360 --> 0:13:08.440
<v Speaker 1>to Tesla, there were several segments of the drive in

0:13:08.480 --> 0:13:13.280
<v Speaker 1>which the vehicle navigated through construction zones and roundabouts and

0:13:13.400 --> 0:13:17.559
<v Speaker 1>didn't have any performance issues. Musk also pointed out that

0:13:17.600 --> 0:13:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Tesla's now rely solely on optical cameras rather than sensors

0:13:21.679 --> 0:13:25.200
<v Speaker 1>like LDAR. Another interesting note is that Musk did this

0:13:25.240 --> 0:13:28.720
<v Speaker 1>demonstration while his company is preparing to defend itself in

0:13:28.800 --> 0:13:32.680
<v Speaker 1>the first of a couple of oncoming court cases that

0:13:33.160 --> 0:13:36.040
<v Speaker 1>are arguing that the company's driver assist features led to

0:13:36.080 --> 0:13:39.679
<v Speaker 1>fatal accidents. So the first court case should begin in

0:13:39.720 --> 0:13:44.720
<v Speaker 1>California in mid September. And it's a civil lawsuit stems

0:13:44.720 --> 0:13:47.640
<v Speaker 1>from a twenty nineteen accident in which a Tesla owner

0:13:47.760 --> 0:13:51.360
<v Speaker 1>named Micah Lee died when his Tesla, which was in

0:13:51.480 --> 0:13:55.599
<v Speaker 1>autopilot mode, veered off a highway. It collided with a

0:13:55.640 --> 0:13:59.320
<v Speaker 1>tree and then burst into flames. Two passengers in Lee's

0:13:59.320 --> 0:14:03.000
<v Speaker 1>car suffered suitvarious injuries, but survive the crash. The second

0:14:03.040 --> 0:14:07.400
<v Speaker 1>court case is scheduled for October in Florida and centers

0:14:07.440 --> 0:14:10.360
<v Speaker 1>on a different crash that happened in twenty nineteen. That's

0:14:10.400 --> 0:14:13.400
<v Speaker 1>when Stephen Banner's Model three failed to detect a big

0:14:13.480 --> 0:14:16.480
<v Speaker 1>rig truck that was crossing the road ahead of him,

0:14:16.840 --> 0:14:21.480
<v Speaker 1>and his Tesla collided with the trailer, which killed Stephen Banner.

0:14:21.880 --> 0:14:25.120
<v Speaker 1>I can't imagine the lawyers at Tesla are super thrilled

0:14:25.160 --> 0:14:28.480
<v Speaker 1>about Elon Musk showing off full self driving on a

0:14:28.520 --> 0:14:32.120
<v Speaker 1>live stream, especially in a demonstration that required him to

0:14:32.200 --> 0:14:36.000
<v Speaker 1>take over to avoid running a red light. While simultaneously

0:14:36.040 --> 0:14:39.880
<v Speaker 1>preparing for these court cases, Microsoft will soon release version

0:14:39.920 --> 0:14:43.400
<v Speaker 1>one seventeen of the Edge web browser and will actually

0:14:43.400 --> 0:14:47.000
<v Speaker 1>be removing some features in the process. Microsoft said the

0:14:47.040 --> 0:14:50.280
<v Speaker 1>decision to remove the tools was to quote improve end

0:14:50.360 --> 0:14:54.320
<v Speaker 1>user experience and simplify the more tools menu end quote.

0:14:54.560 --> 0:14:57.680
<v Speaker 1>As reported by The Verge, truth be told, I hadn't

0:14:57.720 --> 0:14:59.760
<v Speaker 1>even heard of these features at all, so it's quite

0:14:59.760 --> 0:15:02.200
<v Speaker 1>poossible that very few people are making use of them.

0:15:02.680 --> 0:15:05.560
<v Speaker 1>Then again, according to at least some statistical analysis firms,

0:15:05.640 --> 0:15:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft Edge commands just five percent of the web browser

0:15:08.680 --> 0:15:11.520
<v Speaker 1>market in total, so you could argue very few people

0:15:11.520 --> 0:15:15.840
<v Speaker 1>are making use of Edge full stop anyway. The features

0:15:15.840 --> 0:15:22.400
<v Speaker 1>affected are picture dictionary citations, math Solver, kids Mode, and

0:15:22.680 --> 0:15:25.320
<v Speaker 1>grammar tools. If you are one of the few elite

0:15:25.640 --> 0:15:29.840
<v Speaker 1>that this actually will affect, you have my condolences. Microsoft

0:15:29.920 --> 0:15:33.520
<v Speaker 1>will push this update out of the beta phase. In

0:15:33.600 --> 0:15:36.560
<v Speaker 1>mid September, Carl Bode of tech Dirt wrote a piece

0:15:36.600 --> 0:15:39.600
<v Speaker 1>explaining how e byte companies, through a trade organization called

0:15:39.640 --> 0:15:42.920
<v Speaker 1>People for Bikes, has lobbied lawmakers in the United States

0:15:42.920 --> 0:15:45.360
<v Speaker 1>to make exceptions for e bikes in various right to

0:15:45.400 --> 0:15:48.680
<v Speaker 1>repair laws. Essentially, these companies are trying to make sure

0:15:48.720 --> 0:15:51.520
<v Speaker 1>that they can maintain control of the entire ecosystem for

0:15:51.560 --> 0:15:54.520
<v Speaker 1>their products, rather than open up so that customers can

0:15:54.600 --> 0:15:58.160
<v Speaker 1>either perform their own maintenance and repairs or to seek

0:15:58.240 --> 0:16:01.600
<v Speaker 1>those from an independent repair shop. The argument that the

0:16:01.600 --> 0:16:03.960
<v Speaker 1>group has been making is one we have heard before,

0:16:04.280 --> 0:16:07.320
<v Speaker 1>that this is really for the customer's safety. The group

0:16:07.440 --> 0:16:09.440
<v Speaker 1>argues that allowing people to do their own maintenance and

0:16:09.480 --> 0:16:12.560
<v Speaker 1>repair could lead to an increased risk of stuff like fires,

0:16:13.000 --> 0:16:15.840
<v Speaker 1>and while e bikes have been one of those electronic

0:16:15.920 --> 0:16:18.720
<v Speaker 1>products that have had problems with batteries catching on fire,

0:16:19.320 --> 0:16:22.400
<v Speaker 1>that has had more to do with poor manufacturing processes

0:16:22.920 --> 0:16:26.080
<v Speaker 1>than anything else. In fact, when pressed to cite figures

0:16:26.080 --> 0:16:28.400
<v Speaker 1>about how many fires were the result of an e

0:16:28.480 --> 0:16:31.120
<v Speaker 1>bike owner trying to do their own repairs, a rep

0:16:31.160 --> 0:16:34.440
<v Speaker 1>for the group said that the stories were quote unquote anecdotal,

0:16:34.960 --> 0:16:36.800
<v Speaker 1>which is another way of saying, I don't have any

0:16:36.840 --> 0:16:40.560
<v Speaker 1>evidence that this is actually a thing. And apparently these

0:16:40.600 --> 0:16:43.640
<v Speaker 1>lobbying efforts have been pretty effective, with e bikes getting

0:16:43.680 --> 0:16:46.880
<v Speaker 1>exceptions and several right to repair laws around the United States,

0:16:47.360 --> 0:16:50.560
<v Speaker 1>though not as tech Dirt reports in Minnesota. However, the

0:16:50.600 --> 0:16:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota law did make exceptions for game consoles, medical equipment,

0:16:54.000 --> 0:16:57.480
<v Speaker 1>and cars. Back in two thousand and eight, California voters

0:16:57.480 --> 0:17:00.880
<v Speaker 1>approved initial funding for a high speed rails within the state.

0:17:01.480 --> 0:17:03.560
<v Speaker 1>This is the same system that would later prompt Elon

0:17:03.680 --> 0:17:05.400
<v Speaker 1>Musk to say the whole thing was a huge waste

0:17:05.440 --> 0:17:07.600
<v Speaker 1>of money, and that a hyper loop system would be

0:17:07.640 --> 0:17:11.080
<v Speaker 1>faster and more effective. Of course, the hyper loop failed

0:17:11.080 --> 0:17:13.800
<v Speaker 1>to materialize, and despite several companies trying to make it

0:17:13.840 --> 0:17:16.679
<v Speaker 1>a thing, it has never manifested, at least not in

0:17:16.680 --> 0:17:20.840
<v Speaker 1>the way that Musk initially promoted it anyway. In the meantime,

0:17:20.960 --> 0:17:23.560
<v Speaker 1>over those years, the project for high speed rail has

0:17:23.640 --> 0:17:27.000
<v Speaker 1>moved forward, though very slowly, with the state engaged in

0:17:27.040 --> 0:17:30.840
<v Speaker 1>construction across hundreds of miles in California while still working

0:17:30.880 --> 0:17:34.840
<v Speaker 1>to receive environmental approval for some key stretches, and now

0:17:34.920 --> 0:17:38.080
<v Speaker 1>that project is officially putting out an RFQ, or Request

0:17:38.160 --> 0:17:41.000
<v Speaker 1>for Qualifications to look for vendors who would provide the

0:17:41.040 --> 0:17:43.520
<v Speaker 1>actual trains that will travel on those rails once they

0:17:43.520 --> 0:17:46.919
<v Speaker 1>are finished. Interested companies will need to respond to the

0:17:47.040 --> 0:17:51.280
<v Speaker 1>RFQ by November. The California High Speed Rail Authority will

0:17:51.280 --> 0:17:53.879
<v Speaker 1>consider the candidates and then narrow the search in early

0:17:53.960 --> 0:17:56.439
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty four. To qualify, the companies will have to

0:17:56.440 --> 0:17:58.520
<v Speaker 1>be able to build trains that can operate at speeds

0:17:58.560 --> 0:18:01.360
<v Speaker 1>of two hundred and twenty miles per hour, with tests

0:18:01.400 --> 0:18:03.639
<v Speaker 1>as high as two hundred and forty two miles per

0:18:03.640 --> 0:18:07.920
<v Speaker 1>hour at least according to Los Angeles news outlet KTLA five.

0:18:08.520 --> 0:18:11.080
<v Speaker 1>The company selected will have to build all the trains

0:18:11.200 --> 0:18:13.639
<v Speaker 1>for the system and provide access to spare parts for

0:18:13.720 --> 0:18:17.199
<v Speaker 1>thirty years, which is important. Here in Atlanta, we have

0:18:17.280 --> 0:18:19.720
<v Speaker 1>a train system where the company that made the trains

0:18:20.480 --> 0:18:24.000
<v Speaker 1>doesn't exist anymore, so getting replacement parts requires a lot

0:18:24.040 --> 0:18:26.960
<v Speaker 1>more work. The authority's goal is to have the high

0:18:26.960 --> 0:18:29.760
<v Speaker 1>speed rail service in action by twenty thirty. Personally, I

0:18:29.800 --> 0:18:31.800
<v Speaker 1>have my doubts that it will be ready by then,

0:18:32.160 --> 0:18:34.960
<v Speaker 1>simply because these projects are so huge and complicated, and

0:18:35.040 --> 0:18:38.320
<v Speaker 1>made even more complex through local and state politics, which

0:18:38.680 --> 0:18:41.640
<v Speaker 1>change with every election. But here's hoping California is able

0:18:41.640 --> 0:18:44.760
<v Speaker 1>to see this project come to completion and perhaps serve

0:18:44.880 --> 0:18:47.800
<v Speaker 1>as a model that other states could follow. The lack

0:18:47.840 --> 0:18:50.600
<v Speaker 1>of high speed rail lines across the United States is

0:18:50.720 --> 0:18:54.920
<v Speaker 1>pretty embarrassing. Our final story is about how some hackers

0:18:55.000 --> 0:18:57.960
<v Speaker 1>say they have infiltrated a company called web Detective, which

0:18:58.000 --> 0:19:02.000
<v Speaker 1>makes spyware, and they have subsequent deleted all the device

0:19:02.200 --> 0:19:05.399
<v Speaker 1>information that the company had, which will make it impossible

0:19:05.400 --> 0:19:09.600
<v Speaker 1>for web Detective to collect additional data from those compromised devices.

0:19:09.720 --> 0:19:13.080
<v Speaker 1>According to Engadget. That means around seventy six thousand devices

0:19:13.560 --> 0:19:17.480
<v Speaker 1>will no longer be spying on their owners. Not all

0:19:17.520 --> 0:19:21.240
<v Speaker 1>heroes wear capes, some of them wear hoodies. All right,

0:19:21.680 --> 0:19:25.000
<v Speaker 1>that's it for the tech News for Tuesday, August twenty

0:19:25.080 --> 0:19:28.399
<v Speaker 1>ninth to twenty twenty three. I hope you are all well,

0:19:28.880 --> 0:19:38.560
<v Speaker 1>and I'll talk to you again really soon. Tech Stuff

0:19:38.640 --> 0:19:43.160
<v Speaker 1>is an iHeartRadio production. For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit

0:19:43.200 --> 0:19:46.720
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to

0:19:46.760 --> 0:19:51.280
<v Speaker 1>your favorite shows.