WEBVTT - Total Isolation Is Not Scientifically Supported. Dr. Atlas Talks to A&G.

0:00:01.560 --> 0:00:03.920
<v Speaker 1>When you're ready to ride Metro, we want you to

0:00:03.960 --> 0:00:06.560
<v Speaker 1>know we're ready for you. Here are just a few

0:00:06.559 --> 0:00:08.399
<v Speaker 1>of the people at Metro to tell you how we're

0:00:08.400 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>doing our part to keep writers safe. Cleaning before you're found,

0:00:14.800 --> 0:00:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Hans out of no mask, no Metro need one. We

0:00:20.600 --> 0:00:23.480
<v Speaker 1>have a few extras at Metro. We're doing our part

0:00:23.560 --> 0:00:26.000
<v Speaker 1>to keep the DC area moving. Find out more at

0:00:26.040 --> 0:00:32.160
<v Speaker 1>well mata dot com slash doing our part California where

0:00:32.159 --> 0:00:36.559
<v Speaker 1>this past week thousands of people were massing on beaches

0:00:36.640 --> 0:00:40.199
<v Speaker 1>and very close quarters. Simple question, is not safe if

0:00:40.240 --> 0:00:43.000
<v Speaker 1>it's done with social distancing. Yes, if it's not done

0:00:43.000 --> 0:00:47.360
<v Speaker 1>with social distancing, no little. Earlier on the Armstrong and

0:00:47.400 --> 0:00:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Getty Show, we quoted a piece on the Hill dot

0:00:50.720 --> 0:00:53.920
<v Speaker 1>com by Dr Scott Atlas of the Hoover Institution that

0:00:54.000 --> 0:00:57.000
<v Speaker 1>the data is in stop the panic, in the total isolation.

0:00:57.640 --> 0:01:00.280
<v Speaker 1>And indeed Dr Atlas joins is now. He's the David

0:01:00.320 --> 0:01:03.360
<v Speaker 1>and Joan try To Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution,

0:01:03.440 --> 0:01:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Stanford University and a member of Hoover's Into the Hoover

0:01:06.200 --> 0:01:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Institutions Working Group on Healthcare Policy. Dr Atlas, how are you, sir?

0:01:11.480 --> 0:01:13.759
<v Speaker 1>Doing well? Thanks for having me good. It's my pleasure.

0:01:13.760 --> 0:01:17.120
<v Speaker 1>It's been too long. So first of all, speaking of

0:01:17.600 --> 0:01:19.800
<v Speaker 1>eminent publications. Will get to your piece in the Hill

0:01:19.800 --> 0:01:21.319
<v Speaker 1>in a second. But the New York Times is out

0:01:21.360 --> 0:01:24.720
<v Speaker 1>with the story just this morning alleging that the White

0:01:24.760 --> 0:01:27.880
<v Speaker 1>House has new projections and indeed the death rate from

0:01:27.920 --> 0:01:31.600
<v Speaker 1>the COVID nineteen is set to rise steeply, and that

0:01:31.800 --> 0:01:33.000
<v Speaker 1>what do you make of that if you had a

0:01:33.080 --> 0:01:37.160
<v Speaker 1>chance to see that, Well, I haven't had the chance

0:01:37.200 --> 0:01:39.959
<v Speaker 1>to see it, and I try not to have to

0:01:40.040 --> 0:01:43.440
<v Speaker 1>defend what someone else has written, but I can say

0:01:43.480 --> 0:01:46.119
<v Speaker 1>that we we we know there will be more people

0:01:46.200 --> 0:01:48.280
<v Speaker 1>to die, because if you look at the numbers of

0:01:48.280 --> 0:01:53.040
<v Speaker 1>people in serious condition, we know there are thousands and

0:01:53.200 --> 0:01:55.960
<v Speaker 1>thousands of them will die, there's no question. But you

0:01:56.000 --> 0:01:58.480
<v Speaker 1>have to remember that the death from this does not

0:01:58.680 --> 0:02:04.120
<v Speaker 1>occur until three to four weeks after the transmission infection.

0:02:04.520 --> 0:02:08.519
<v Speaker 1>So because someone dies this week or five days from now,

0:02:08.720 --> 0:02:11.720
<v Speaker 1>that is not a reflection of a new infection. That's

0:02:11.720 --> 0:02:16.000
<v Speaker 1>a reflection of the infection three or four weeks ago. Right.

0:02:16.120 --> 0:02:19.160
<v Speaker 1>And And another problem I have with the article and

0:02:19.200 --> 0:02:20.880
<v Speaker 1>some of the things other people have said lately, as

0:02:20.880 --> 0:02:23.240
<v Speaker 1>they're talking about the rise in cases, and the right

0:02:23.400 --> 0:02:27.080
<v Speaker 1>the number of cases is utterly unknowable because we've had

0:02:27.120 --> 0:02:32.120
<v Speaker 1>such an enormous rise in testing. That's exactly right. In fact,

0:02:32.160 --> 0:02:33.960
<v Speaker 1>we can say it another way, which is that we

0:02:34.040 --> 0:02:36.840
<v Speaker 1>know the number of cases is going up the more

0:02:36.919 --> 0:02:43.560
<v Speaker 1>we test. By definition, right, exactly so, based on everything

0:02:43.600 --> 0:02:48.360
<v Speaker 1>you've seen, where are we on the curve on suppressing

0:02:48.400 --> 0:02:53.119
<v Speaker 1>this thing, on moving toward normalcy? And where should we be? Well,

0:02:53.160 --> 0:02:57.000
<v Speaker 1>we know several things since this began. We have the evidence.

0:02:57.440 --> 0:03:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Number one, we know who to protect. We know that

0:03:01.120 --> 0:03:03.880
<v Speaker 1>the vulnerable people are older people. Typically, these are the

0:03:03.919 --> 0:03:07.800
<v Speaker 1>people with underlying diseases that get hospitalized and have a

0:03:07.880 --> 0:03:11.800
<v Speaker 1>much higher risk of dying. We know that uh people

0:03:12.680 --> 0:03:17.400
<v Speaker 1>are also being hospitalized in that group. Younger people, healthier

0:03:17.440 --> 0:03:19.960
<v Speaker 1>people have a very little, if any risk of a

0:03:20.040 --> 0:03:24.600
<v Speaker 1>serious illness requiring hospitalization. We know the curves have flattened.

0:03:25.200 --> 0:03:28.080
<v Speaker 1>We're not in the beginning anymore. We understand the whole

0:03:28.120 --> 0:03:32.160
<v Speaker 1>goal of the policy originally was to see the curves flattened.

0:03:32.200 --> 0:03:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Now we're talking about two curves hospitalizations per day, and

0:03:36.760 --> 0:03:40.080
<v Speaker 1>that's per day. We're not talking about cases, because cases,

0:03:40.120 --> 0:03:43.200
<v Speaker 1>as we know, are going to be revealed by more testing,

0:03:43.280 --> 0:03:46.800
<v Speaker 1>that's not really a relevant statistic. In fact, we know

0:03:46.920 --> 0:03:50.920
<v Speaker 1>half the people who get the infections are entirely asymptomatic

0:03:50.960 --> 0:03:56.160
<v Speaker 1>in the overwhelming majority our mild disease cases. So the

0:03:56.280 --> 0:04:00.240
<v Speaker 1>protection of the vulnerable is the targeted appropriate policy. See.

0:04:00.480 --> 0:04:04.080
<v Speaker 1>And we know two other very important things. One is

0:04:04.160 --> 0:04:07.760
<v Speaker 1>based on the isolation policy, and that is there has

0:04:07.800 --> 0:04:11.880
<v Speaker 1>been a complete stoppage of medical care for people without

0:04:12.080 --> 0:04:17.840
<v Speaker 1>COVID nineteen pandemic impacts, and so we have stopped essential

0:04:18.200 --> 0:04:23.080
<v Speaker 1>critical healthcare. People are dying because they're not getting their chemotherapy,

0:04:23.400 --> 0:04:26.440
<v Speaker 1>they're not getting their organ transplants, they're not getting their

0:04:26.480 --> 0:04:30.640
<v Speaker 1>brain surgery, and what's worse, they're not bringing their children

0:04:30.760 --> 0:04:35.760
<v Speaker 1>in for immunizations. People are not getting cancer screening. Biopsies

0:04:35.800 --> 0:04:38.560
<v Speaker 1>of tumors that are potentially cancer are not getting done.

0:04:38.680 --> 0:04:43.200
<v Speaker 1>This is a massive catastrophic healthcare crisis being created by

0:04:43.240 --> 0:04:46.240
<v Speaker 1>the policy itself. And then the other thing that we

0:04:46.360 --> 0:04:51.160
<v Speaker 1>know is that, based on decades of medical knowledge about immunology, virology,

0:04:51.160 --> 0:04:57.400
<v Speaker 1>and infectious disease, viruses are when they are low, low impact,

0:04:57.440 --> 0:04:59.240
<v Speaker 1>they get in set the in fact of a lot

0:04:59.279 --> 0:05:03.599
<v Speaker 1>of people people develop antibodies that is immunity in that

0:05:03.720 --> 0:05:07.359
<v Speaker 1>immunity in the population is the way that the whole

0:05:07.360 --> 0:05:14.159
<v Speaker 1>population breaks the chain of contagiousness into including protecting vulnerable people.

0:05:14.480 --> 0:05:18.400
<v Speaker 1>That is the exact reason why we give widespread immunizations,

0:05:18.600 --> 0:05:22.440
<v Speaker 1>for instance, to set up population immunity. That is the

0:05:22.560 --> 0:05:27.360
<v Speaker 1>reason why scientists are excited about transfusing antibodies from people

0:05:27.400 --> 0:05:30.640
<v Speaker 1>who've had the infection to people who might get or

0:05:30.720 --> 0:05:35.080
<v Speaker 1>in trouble with the infection, because those antibodies are presumed

0:05:35.400 --> 0:05:38.240
<v Speaker 1>to be protective. Do we know that antibodies in this

0:05:38.320 --> 0:05:40.960
<v Speaker 1>are protective yet? No, we don't know, but it would

0:05:41.000 --> 0:05:44.839
<v Speaker 1>be unexpected that they're not, and you have evidence, actually

0:05:45.000 --> 0:05:47.840
<v Speaker 1>work in progress evidence that that that they probably are.

0:05:48.360 --> 0:05:51.080
<v Speaker 1>And so, by the way, we have decades of knowledge

0:05:51.120 --> 0:05:54.520
<v Speaker 1>not just about viruses, but about coronaviruses. And this is

0:05:54.560 --> 0:05:57.640
<v Speaker 1>the same family. Now this is not this is its

0:05:57.680 --> 0:06:01.520
<v Speaker 1>own virus, but in the coronavirus family, we know from

0:06:01.600 --> 0:06:05.719
<v Speaker 1>decades of experience that there is protection for roughly one

0:06:05.920 --> 0:06:10.240
<v Speaker 1>to two years. It's it's expected that antibis are protective.

0:06:10.839 --> 0:06:14.200
<v Speaker 1>That's the whole point of even developing an immunization for

0:06:14.240 --> 0:06:18.960
<v Speaker 1>this disease itself, right, am I corrected. The current best

0:06:19.480 --> 0:06:23.880
<v Speaker 1>opinion of science is that the repeat infections that we've

0:06:23.880 --> 0:06:25.600
<v Speaker 1>heard about people who have gotten over the thing and

0:06:25.720 --> 0:06:30.720
<v Speaker 1>reinfected were probably false positive tests. Well, because if this

0:06:30.839 --> 0:06:33.400
<v Speaker 1>then can't be defeated by our own immune systems, even

0:06:33.400 --> 0:06:35.480
<v Speaker 1>if after we've had it and gotten over it. I mean,

0:06:35.520 --> 0:06:40.680
<v Speaker 1>that's truly terrifying. Well, we shouldn't be terrified about anything,

0:06:40.680 --> 0:06:43.839
<v Speaker 1>first of all, because public policy should never be impacted

0:06:43.839 --> 0:06:47.839
<v Speaker 1>by fear. It must be based on the science, the data,

0:06:48.000 --> 0:06:52.000
<v Speaker 1>medical knowledge, and simply logic. Okay, so that's point number one.

0:06:52.000 --> 0:06:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Point number two, there's sort of a frenzy about this, uh,

0:06:55.839 --> 0:06:59.000
<v Speaker 1>this idea that we need a vaccine to reopen, and

0:06:59.080 --> 0:07:01.360
<v Speaker 1>we have to realize there's some magic wand out there

0:07:01.400 --> 0:07:06.040
<v Speaker 1>for a vaccine because most many vaccines are not protective.

0:07:06.040 --> 0:07:09.120
<v Speaker 1>I'll give you an example, the flu vaccine. With the

0:07:09.160 --> 0:07:11.880
<v Speaker 1>flu vaccine, if you look it up on the CDC

0:07:12.040 --> 0:07:16.600
<v Speaker 1>website itself, it's only forty effective. That's point number one

0:07:16.640 --> 0:07:19.920
<v Speaker 1>about the flu vaccine and a vaccine. Point number two,

0:07:20.000 --> 0:07:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Even with the flu vaccine in the world, every single

0:07:25.240 --> 0:07:29.400
<v Speaker 1>flu season, three hundreds of six hundred and fifty thousand

0:07:29.480 --> 0:07:34.280
<v Speaker 1>people die from the flu with the flu vaccine being given. Okay,

0:07:34.280 --> 0:07:37.040
<v Speaker 1>so we have to be very careful about somehow there's

0:07:37.080 --> 0:07:40.240
<v Speaker 1>some magical vaccine out there, not to mention it's going

0:07:40.240 --> 0:07:43.000
<v Speaker 1>to take many, many months to get a vaccine. This

0:07:43.080 --> 0:07:46.120
<v Speaker 1>is not happening tomorrow, and implement the you know, giving

0:07:46.160 --> 0:07:48.560
<v Speaker 1>the vaccine up. So, I mean, there's all kinds of

0:07:48.560 --> 0:07:51.400
<v Speaker 1>things that are being done that are based upon sort

0:07:51.440 --> 0:07:55.200
<v Speaker 1>of a lack of logic and illogical and almost you know,

0:07:55.520 --> 0:07:59.920
<v Speaker 1>almost irrational, uh sort of methodology. Here. The idea that

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:04.080
<v Speaker 1>we must treat and stop every single infection from COVID

0:08:04.200 --> 0:08:10.280
<v Speaker 1>nineteen at all costs is simply just not rational or logical.

0:08:10.320 --> 0:08:13.080
<v Speaker 1>That was never the goal of the policy. We have

0:08:13.320 --> 0:08:16.800
<v Speaker 1>done what we wanted to do, which is flattening the curve.

0:08:17.080 --> 0:08:21.360
<v Speaker 1>We must end this total isolation. It's it's harmful, it's

0:08:21.360 --> 0:08:24.640
<v Speaker 1>it's destructive. Well, and I think a lot of what's

0:08:24.720 --> 0:08:27.320
<v Speaker 1>driving policy at this point though the governors and the

0:08:27.400 --> 0:08:30.560
<v Speaker 1>president's people painstakingly repeat over and over again that this

0:08:30.800 --> 0:08:34.439
<v Speaker 1>is data driven, in science driven. What's missing is we're

0:08:34.440 --> 0:08:38.880
<v Speaker 1>discussing earlier, is that you have economic damage, and the

0:08:38.960 --> 0:08:43.200
<v Speaker 1>economy is inseparable from health outcomes. In half a dozen

0:08:43.320 --> 0:08:46.640
<v Speaker 1>different ways, and as you pointed out, it's brought medical

0:08:46.800 --> 0:08:50.600
<v Speaker 1>care to a standstill that will directly lead to the

0:08:50.679 --> 0:08:54.640
<v Speaker 1>loss of life. And it's just so frustrating that we're

0:08:54.760 --> 0:08:57.840
<v Speaker 1>hearing only one side of the argument being represented, and

0:08:57.880 --> 0:09:00.600
<v Speaker 1>that is we must prevent as many cases as possible,

0:09:00.640 --> 0:09:07.320
<v Speaker 1>and they're wilfully or just ignoring the huge other aspects

0:09:07.360 --> 0:09:10.800
<v Speaker 1>of the thing. It's frustrating to listen to. Well, I mean,

0:09:10.880 --> 0:09:13.400
<v Speaker 1>I think those are good points, uh, And we're not

0:09:13.480 --> 0:09:16.400
<v Speaker 1>really here to criticize what was done. We're only talking

0:09:16.440 --> 0:09:20.800
<v Speaker 1>about what to do now and what we know now right,

0:09:20.880 --> 0:09:24.040
<v Speaker 1>and what we know now really is who to protect.

0:09:24.280 --> 0:09:27.760
<v Speaker 1>There is no science that says that people must be

0:09:27.840 --> 0:09:31.880
<v Speaker 1>confined in their homes. There is no science to say

0:09:31.920 --> 0:09:37.640
<v Speaker 1>that we must close all outdoor activities, parts and recreation

0:09:37.720 --> 0:09:41.440
<v Speaker 1>and keep you inside your home. The science does not say,

0:09:41.600 --> 0:09:44.800
<v Speaker 1>does not say to keep K through twelve schools closed.

0:09:44.800 --> 0:09:48.840
<v Speaker 1>These are children with virtually no risk of serious disease

0:09:49.400 --> 0:09:53.120
<v Speaker 1>or or you know, hospitalization. And there is some suggestion,

0:09:53.160 --> 0:09:55.120
<v Speaker 1>although I don't know, the data is not out yet

0:09:55.120 --> 0:09:57.640
<v Speaker 1>on this, that there's actually a low level of contagiousness.

0:09:57.640 --> 0:09:59.800
<v Speaker 1>But I'm not sure about that yet, But we have

0:09:59.880 --> 0:10:02.880
<v Speaker 1>to follow the science. I'm saying, follow the science and

0:10:03.000 --> 0:10:06.680
<v Speaker 1>using medical knowledge to proceed. We there is no science

0:10:06.720 --> 0:10:12.040
<v Speaker 1>to support continuing total isolation. Dr Scott Atlas is a

0:10:12.120 --> 0:10:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Senior Fellow with the Hoover Institution of Stanford University. Is

0:10:15.000 --> 0:10:18.280
<v Speaker 1>most recent book is Restoring Quality Healthcare, A six Point

0:10:18.320 --> 0:10:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Plan for Comprehensive Reform at Lower Cost. Uh Scott, Dr Atlas,

0:10:23.120 --> 0:10:26.640
<v Speaker 1>we appreciate your time very much, really interesting. Thanks thanks

0:10:26.640 --> 0:10:30.560
<v Speaker 1>for having me. It's it's our pleasure. Yeah, you know,

0:10:31.960 --> 0:10:36.000
<v Speaker 1>the one sightedness of this makes me nuts. Nobody ever

0:10:36.080 --> 0:10:40.760
<v Speaker 1>says to Governor X, Y or Z, you're talking about

0:10:40.800 --> 0:10:46.320
<v Speaker 1>presenting your preventing rather cases at what cost? At what

0:10:46.520 --> 0:10:49.080
<v Speaker 1>cost are we doing is? I mean, even if it

0:10:49.240 --> 0:10:54.320
<v Speaker 1>were effective? And Dr Atlas obviously had some serious questions

0:10:54.320 --> 0:10:56.800
<v Speaker 1>about the effectiveness or necessity of some of the things

0:10:56.800 --> 0:11:01.000
<v Speaker 1>that we're doing. Even if if it were effected, given

0:11:01.040 --> 0:11:05.840
<v Speaker 1>the fact that there are absolutely and disputably enormous costs

0:11:06.200 --> 0:11:09.160
<v Speaker 1>to the policy, we need to see both sides of

0:11:09.200 --> 0:11:12.200
<v Speaker 1>the ledger. And I've been making the argument for quite

0:11:12.200 --> 0:11:15.360
<v Speaker 1>some time about the economy being in a you know,

0:11:15.640 --> 0:11:20.320
<v Speaker 1>um being linked to health outcomes. And that's absolutely true.

0:11:20.320 --> 0:11:22.079
<v Speaker 1>But is the good doctor pointed out it? No, it's

0:11:22.120 --> 0:11:25.240
<v Speaker 1>it's even more direct than that. People aren't getting chemotherapy.

0:11:25.280 --> 0:11:29.360
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna die. So are you trading tow COVID lives

0:11:29.440 --> 0:11:34.160
<v Speaker 1>for one chemotherapy life? How about two COVID lives for

0:11:34.320 --> 0:11:38.040
<v Speaker 1>two or maybe it's two COVID lives for three, four,

0:11:38.280 --> 0:11:44.199
<v Speaker 1>five chemotherapy lives? Is anybody doing that math? Or are

0:11:44.200 --> 0:11:47.480
<v Speaker 1>they just listening to the muling of the media and

0:11:47.480 --> 0:11:50.679
<v Speaker 1>and and you know it will become obsessed with this

0:11:50.760 --> 0:11:52.960
<v Speaker 1>thing because it's such a clickbait and such a good

0:11:53.200 --> 0:11:57.160
<v Speaker 1>headline grabber, and and you know, the policies are a

0:11:57.240 --> 0:12:00.360
<v Speaker 1>response to the you know, the emotional about first to

0:12:00.440 --> 0:12:04.360
<v Speaker 1>the media mostly and not based on any rational weighing

0:12:04.400 --> 0:12:07.560
<v Speaker 1>of costs and benefits. All right, Uh so we're gonna

0:12:07.559 --> 0:12:10.640
<v Speaker 1>finish strong. In a moment or two. Have the absolutely

0:12:10.880 --> 0:12:16.440
<v Speaker 1>terrific mayor of Newport Beach, California taking on the governor,

0:12:16.800 --> 0:12:20.440
<v Speaker 1>Gavin Newsom. And what he says is just great. You're

0:12:20.440 --> 0:12:29.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna want to hear it. It's next when you're ready

0:12:29.480 --> 0:12:31.960
<v Speaker 1>to ride metro, we want you to know we're ready

0:12:32.040 --> 0:12:34.200
<v Speaker 1>for you. Here are just a few of the people

0:12:34.240 --> 0:12:36.360
<v Speaker 1>at Metro to tell you how we're doing our part

0:12:36.440 --> 0:12:42.440
<v Speaker 1>to keep riders safe. Were cleaning before you've found hansund

0:12:42.440 --> 0:12:47.720
<v Speaker 1>of size of no masks, no Metro need one. We

0:12:47.760 --> 0:12:50.640
<v Speaker 1>have a few extras at Metro. We're doing our part

0:12:50.720 --> 0:12:53.200
<v Speaker 1>to keep the DC area moving. Find out more at

0:12:53.200 --> 0:12:55.360
<v Speaker 1>well mata dot com, slash doing our part