WEBVTT - Obama Spied On Trump

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:09.720
<v Speaker 1>You are entering the freedom hunt. Was it spying or

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.960
<v Speaker 1>was it just clandestine surveillance for political ends that the

0:00:14.000 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>FBI engaged in, perhaps with some other government folks when

0:00:17.840 --> 0:00:20.200
<v Speaker 1>it came to the Trump campaign. We have the current

0:00:20.239 --> 0:00:23.760
<v Speaker 1>FBI director weighing in on that. Plus will they impeach

0:00:24.079 --> 0:00:26.840
<v Speaker 1>or not? Do the Democrats even know their own mind

0:00:26.880 --> 0:00:29.680
<v Speaker 1>on the issue. We've also got Gordon Chang joining us

0:00:29.720 --> 0:00:33.080
<v Speaker 1>to talk about China trade and Lyla Rose from Live

0:00:33.120 --> 0:00:37.080
<v Speaker 1>Action on a pro life movement that you might want

0:00:37.080 --> 0:00:40.200
<v Speaker 1>to hear about. Folks that are more coming up. Buck

0:00:40.280 --> 0:00:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Sexton Mission, decoding the news and disseminating information with actionable intelligence.

0:00:48.320 --> 0:00:52.600
<v Speaker 1>No mistake here, a great American again, this is the

0:00:52.800 --> 0:00:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Buck Sexton Show. Palma CIA analysts, I can speak to

0:00:58.120 --> 0:01:00.520
<v Speaker 1>three hours without a phone call. Try doing that sometime.

0:01:03.840 --> 0:01:05.800
<v Speaker 1>A couple of things going on. First, there is, of

0:01:05.800 --> 0:01:10.720
<v Speaker 1>course the ongoing Inspector General's investigation that's being conducted by

0:01:10.760 --> 0:01:14.480
<v Speaker 1>the Independent Office of Inspector General, and our folks are

0:01:14.680 --> 0:01:19.680
<v Speaker 1>assisting them with their effort. And then, second, as you

0:01:19.880 --> 0:01:25.760
<v Speaker 1>alluded to, now that the Special Council investigation is completed

0:01:26.520 --> 0:01:29.640
<v Speaker 1>and having only recently returned to the Department. The Attorney

0:01:29.640 --> 0:01:34.920
<v Speaker 1>General is seeking to understand better the circumstances at the

0:01:35.000 --> 0:01:40.160
<v Speaker 1>Department and the FBI relating to how this investigation started,

0:01:40.720 --> 0:01:44.160
<v Speaker 1>and we're working to help him get that understanding. I

0:01:44.160 --> 0:01:46.399
<v Speaker 1>think that's part of his job and part of mine.

0:01:47.960 --> 0:01:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Buck Saxton Show. That's a long answer

0:01:51.880 --> 0:01:54.720
<v Speaker 1>from FBI Director Ray about are we going to find

0:01:54.720 --> 0:01:59.720
<v Speaker 1>out if there were spying or not? Surveillance as I

0:01:59.800 --> 0:02:02.000
<v Speaker 1>know fond of saying, it's really just a fancy French

0:02:02.040 --> 0:02:08.760
<v Speaker 1>word for spying. Silveillance, surveillance, right to watch, usually in

0:02:08.880 --> 0:02:14.200
<v Speaker 1>clandestine fashion, to gather information on I could tell you

0:02:14.240 --> 0:02:18.360
<v Speaker 1>that when you fly a plane over enemy territory to

0:02:18.480 --> 0:02:22.440
<v Speaker 1>see all their stuff, you can call it a surveillance plane.

0:02:22.880 --> 0:02:25.799
<v Speaker 1>You could also call it a spy plane. Both are

0:02:25.919 --> 0:02:31.200
<v Speaker 1>both are correct. And this fight over words, which, as

0:02:31.200 --> 0:02:34.120
<v Speaker 1>I tell you, Democrats love to try and dictate the

0:02:34.160 --> 0:02:37.839
<v Speaker 1>words that we can use as a means of assisting

0:02:37.880 --> 0:02:40.040
<v Speaker 1>their side in the battle of ideas before we can

0:02:40.080 --> 0:02:47.600
<v Speaker 1>even mount our own defense. The insistence on not using

0:02:47.639 --> 0:02:55.080
<v Speaker 1>the term spying is very, very indicative of where their

0:02:55.320 --> 0:02:59.000
<v Speaker 1>minds are on all this stuff. They're worried, folks, they're worried.

0:02:59.280 --> 0:03:02.720
<v Speaker 1>They should be worried, because it gets very hard to

0:03:02.760 --> 0:03:06.400
<v Speaker 1>explain spying on a presidential campaign by the top figures

0:03:06.440 --> 0:03:11.120
<v Speaker 1>of the Obama administration national security apparatus. When your justification

0:03:11.200 --> 0:03:17.040
<v Speaker 1>for it is a rumor that George Papadopoulos passed on

0:03:17.080 --> 0:03:23.960
<v Speaker 1>to some foreigner over drinks and Carter Page. It really

0:03:24.040 --> 0:03:26.280
<v Speaker 1>is hard to believe, isn't. In fact, I don't believe it.

0:03:26.320 --> 0:03:27.840
<v Speaker 1>When I say it's hard to believe, I mean I

0:03:27.919 --> 0:03:31.000
<v Speaker 1>think it is incredible. It is incredible, as in not

0:03:31.200 --> 0:03:35.440
<v Speaker 1>possible to be believed. I am incredulous about the story.

0:03:35.720 --> 0:03:38.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that we haven't told the truth yet

0:03:38.280 --> 0:03:41.960
<v Speaker 1>about how this whole thing got going. The Russia collusion

0:03:43.480 --> 0:03:48.720
<v Speaker 1>conspiracy theory was not born of some innocent investigative work

0:03:48.760 --> 0:03:51.680
<v Speaker 1>from the FBI looking into George Papadopolis and Carter Page.

0:03:53.160 --> 0:03:57.160
<v Speaker 1>Someone somewhere in a position of considerable power and an

0:03:57.200 --> 0:04:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Obama administration appointee almost certainly made the call, made a

0:04:02.640 --> 0:04:07.880
<v Speaker 1>decision to do this, and now the country has had

0:04:07.920 --> 0:04:11.680
<v Speaker 1>to suffer the consequences of it for over two years.

0:04:11.920 --> 0:04:14.920
<v Speaker 1>I just I think it's instant that Christopher Ray, as

0:04:14.960 --> 0:04:17.880
<v Speaker 1>the FBI Director of course he's going to defend the

0:04:17.920 --> 0:04:22.400
<v Speaker 1>institution at some level. This is a terrible situation for

0:04:23.640 --> 0:04:27.839
<v Speaker 1>the FBI. This is a terrible situation for public confidence

0:04:28.720 --> 0:04:32.080
<v Speaker 1>in the ability of the premier federal law enforcement agency

0:04:32.080 --> 0:04:36.520
<v Speaker 1>in the country to avoid entangling itself in our politics.

0:04:37.200 --> 0:04:40.040
<v Speaker 1>This looks really bad, folks. But you know, I would

0:04:40.040 --> 0:04:42.320
<v Speaker 1>just say that if they're going to try to play

0:04:42.360 --> 0:04:44.680
<v Speaker 1>these word games, then I wanted I want to make

0:04:44.720 --> 0:04:48.560
<v Speaker 1>sure the left degrees that the FBI back in the

0:04:48.640 --> 0:04:53.320
<v Speaker 1>sixties wasn't spying on Martin Luther King Jr. Oh No, no no, no,

0:04:53.440 --> 0:04:57.839
<v Speaker 1>of course not. The FBI was just engaged in unconstitutional

0:04:57.880 --> 0:05:04.640
<v Speaker 1>surveillance based on on shaky counterintelligence premises, and we're willing

0:05:04.680 --> 0:05:10.560
<v Speaker 1>to deploy human assets to influence events for political outcomes.

0:05:10.600 --> 0:05:14.240
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't spying, though, you see, it was just unconstitutional

0:05:14.279 --> 0:05:21.920
<v Speaker 1>counterintelligence surveillance also known as spying. In fact, co intel

0:05:22.000 --> 0:05:27.560
<v Speaker 1>pro which you can read about anywhere on the internet,

0:05:28.480 --> 0:05:30.840
<v Speaker 1>was written about here in NPR when they're talking about

0:05:30.920 --> 0:05:34.720
<v Speaker 1>this history of the FBI spying on Martin Luther King Jr.

0:05:35.200 --> 0:05:40.800
<v Speaker 1>As a history of domestic spying. So just because the

0:05:40.880 --> 0:05:44.800
<v Speaker 1>FBI does it doesn't mean it's not spying, especially when

0:05:44.839 --> 0:05:48.520
<v Speaker 1>it is in the realm of counterintelligence and not traditional

0:05:48.920 --> 0:05:54.520
<v Speaker 1>criminal law enforcement. All Right, the word is spying, and

0:05:54.600 --> 0:05:57.159
<v Speaker 1>they should have to now. So I'm spying. It's good.

0:05:57.200 --> 0:06:00.479
<v Speaker 1>I worked for a spy agency. Spying on Al Qaida

0:06:00.600 --> 0:06:03.000
<v Speaker 1>is a good thing. I take pride in spying on

0:06:03.040 --> 0:06:05.159
<v Speaker 1>Al Qaida. I mean, I don't do it anymore, but

0:06:06.040 --> 0:06:08.599
<v Speaker 1>that was something that I thought was a great patriotic

0:06:08.640 --> 0:06:14.440
<v Speaker 1>and even pro civilization, pro humanity duty. I would never

0:06:14.480 --> 0:06:17.279
<v Speaker 1>shy away from spying on Al Qaida. So if there

0:06:17.360 --> 0:06:21.200
<v Speaker 1>was a real threat, why, you know, if these FBI

0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:23.440
<v Speaker 1>guys and who knows who else that we're talking to,

0:06:23.520 --> 0:06:26.839
<v Speaker 1>Papadopolis and Carter Page, if it was reasonable even for

0:06:26.880 --> 0:06:28.360
<v Speaker 1>them to think that there was a threat, why would

0:06:28.400 --> 0:06:32.000
<v Speaker 1>they shy away from the term spying so much? They

0:06:32.000 --> 0:06:34.680
<v Speaker 1>should be proud to have spied on the Trump administration

0:06:34.680 --> 0:06:37.960
<v Speaker 1>if that's what they did. But we know they aren't.

0:06:39.480 --> 0:06:45.840
<v Speaker 1>And isn't that instructive? Isn't that something of a red flag?

0:06:46.520 --> 0:06:51.240
<v Speaker 1>You could say? And then some This is where you

0:06:51.279 --> 0:06:55.000
<v Speaker 1>also have Clapper, James Clapper, who has been at the

0:06:55.040 --> 0:06:58.479
<v Speaker 1>heart of so much of this and has done what

0:06:58.640 --> 0:07:03.960
<v Speaker 1>I would argue, is it really multi generational damage, meaning

0:07:04.000 --> 0:07:07.279
<v Speaker 1>that for generations to come people will have questions about

0:07:07.320 --> 0:07:11.960
<v Speaker 1>the lack of political gamesmanship at the CIA, Director of

0:07:12.040 --> 0:07:16.960
<v Speaker 1>National Intelligence, the FBI, at Clapper has been a part

0:07:17.400 --> 0:07:22.440
<v Speaker 1>of dramatically damaging the reputations of these agencies. And I

0:07:22.480 --> 0:07:24.520
<v Speaker 1>know from my friends who there are Trump to range

0:07:24.560 --> 0:07:26.440
<v Speaker 1>people all over the federal government. You have to remember

0:07:26.440 --> 0:07:29.000
<v Speaker 1>that whenever you have the Washington Post or one of

0:07:29.000 --> 0:07:31.760
<v Speaker 1>these papers that says, well, you know, we've spoken to

0:07:31.800 --> 0:07:34.320
<v Speaker 1>sources inside the building and they tell you what their

0:07:34.360 --> 0:07:37.600
<v Speaker 1>snapshot is. They will never tell you that there are

0:07:38.160 --> 0:07:41.280
<v Speaker 1>patriotic conservative types who think that what's been done to

0:07:41.280 --> 0:07:44.840
<v Speaker 1>the president is horrible. And I know people at Langley

0:07:45.080 --> 0:07:48.000
<v Speaker 1>at FBI headquarters that fall into that category. But what

0:07:48.040 --> 0:07:51.640
<v Speaker 1>they will tell you is that there are people who

0:07:51.640 --> 0:07:55.840
<v Speaker 1>are still deeply outraged that Trump think that Trump. Remember

0:07:55.840 --> 0:07:57.400
<v Speaker 1>we used to hear this Trump was at war with

0:07:57.440 --> 0:08:00.000
<v Speaker 1>the intel community. They used to say that the president

0:08:00.000 --> 0:08:03.680
<v Speaker 1>and if it was, it war with his employees, because

0:08:03.720 --> 0:08:06.880
<v Speaker 1>that is what the members of the intelligence community are,

0:08:06.920 --> 0:08:11.880
<v Speaker 1>They are Trump's employees. Clapper clearly didn't think of them

0:08:11.880 --> 0:08:15.400
<v Speaker 1>that way. Though Clapper thought he had a higher purpose,

0:08:15.600 --> 0:08:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Wasn't that was that the James Comey book. Did I

0:08:17.560 --> 0:08:21.240
<v Speaker 1>just do that by accident? I'm so smooth, that was slick.

0:08:21.360 --> 0:08:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Let's be honest. Play clip five here. Using undercover agents

0:08:26.320 --> 0:08:30.840
<v Speaker 1>is a standard and legitimate technique that is widely used

0:08:30.840 --> 0:08:35.040
<v Speaker 1>in investigations. So I'm sure. I mean, there are protocols

0:08:35.080 --> 0:08:39.080
<v Speaker 1>and standard standards for using an agent, and I'm sure

0:08:39.120 --> 0:08:40.920
<v Speaker 1>that's the case here. So you're thinking this was not

0:08:41.000 --> 0:08:47.840
<v Speaker 1>done lightly, Well, no, it's never done lightly. Uh well, yeah,

0:08:47.880 --> 0:08:51.200
<v Speaker 1>I guess it miss meets definitely the Dictionary definition of

0:08:51.280 --> 0:08:55.360
<v Speaker 1>spy of surveillance or spying, a term I don't particularly like.

0:08:55.480 --> 0:08:58.480
<v Speaker 1>It's not a term of art used by intelligence people.

0:08:58.760 --> 0:09:03.200
<v Speaker 1>It has a negative connotation of a rogue operation, out

0:09:03.240 --> 0:09:05.920
<v Speaker 1>of control, not in compliance with the law, and that's

0:09:05.920 --> 0:09:08.640
<v Speaker 1>not the case at all. He doesn't know if that's

0:09:08.640 --> 0:09:11.680
<v Speaker 1>not the case at all, let's start with that, and

0:09:12.240 --> 0:09:14.920
<v Speaker 1>I do appreciate that he's at least willing to admit that. Yeah,

0:09:14.920 --> 0:09:17.840
<v Speaker 1>from a definitional standpoint, it was spine. They were spying

0:09:18.640 --> 0:09:21.880
<v Speaker 1>on the Trump campaign, knowing that it was people tied

0:09:21.880 --> 0:09:28.520
<v Speaker 1>to the Trump campaign trying to use the surveillance fancy

0:09:28.559 --> 0:09:32.640
<v Speaker 1>French word for spying of people tied to Donald Trump

0:09:32.960 --> 0:09:37.240
<v Speaker 1>to get access to information about much higher up people. Remember,

0:09:37.240 --> 0:09:40.040
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't just Carter Page and Papadoppolas. They were very

0:09:40.120 --> 0:09:45.520
<v Speaker 1>interested in Maniford early on, very interested in General Flynn.

0:09:46.600 --> 0:09:51.320
<v Speaker 1>And there's some interesting wording in the I was gonna

0:09:51.360 --> 0:09:54.319
<v Speaker 1>say that dossier in the report, the Mulla report about

0:09:54.320 --> 0:09:57.920
<v Speaker 1>the investigation into Flynn. How thorough was that? How long

0:09:58.000 --> 0:10:00.720
<v Speaker 1>back did that? How far back did that go? It

0:10:00.760 --> 0:10:03.040
<v Speaker 1>seemed like Flynn was on the radar of the authorities,

0:10:03.080 --> 0:10:09.199
<v Speaker 1>perhaps even before the completely pretextual and bad faith Logan

0:10:09.280 --> 0:10:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Act violation meeting came up. Sally Yates set General Flynn up.

0:10:14.800 --> 0:10:17.600
<v Speaker 1>That is what she did. These are not good people.

0:10:17.720 --> 0:10:20.400
<v Speaker 1>These are not people that were acting with the best

0:10:20.440 --> 0:10:25.960
<v Speaker 1>interests of their fellow national security professionals or the United

0:10:26.000 --> 0:10:30.360
<v Speaker 1>States when they did this. This was petty, It was spiteful.

0:10:30.440 --> 0:10:34.559
<v Speaker 1>Sally Yates is a spiteful person, all right. That's why

0:10:34.600 --> 0:10:39.240
<v Speaker 1>she also refused to take orders from the President and

0:10:39.280 --> 0:10:42.959
<v Speaker 1>also refused to resign. Made him fire her because she

0:10:43.120 --> 0:10:47.960
<v Speaker 1>was hashtag resistance. These people are disgraced to the offices

0:10:48.040 --> 0:10:50.800
<v Speaker 1>they held. The Clapper and Yates and Combie a disgrace.

0:10:53.200 --> 0:10:56.720
<v Speaker 1>But notice how with Clapper here he says meets the

0:10:56.760 --> 0:11:01.439
<v Speaker 1>Dictionary definition of spying, but he doesn't like the connotations

0:11:01.440 --> 0:11:03.720
<v Speaker 1>about how it's a rogue operation out of control. He also,

0:11:04.679 --> 0:11:06.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if he's talking to Monsieur Dona Lament

0:11:07.520 --> 0:11:12.440
<v Speaker 1>don Lemon, I prefer the French Don Lament. But when

0:11:12.440 --> 0:11:15.480
<v Speaker 1>he was talking to him there, we just take it

0:11:15.520 --> 0:11:17.440
<v Speaker 1>as a given or he takes it as a given

0:11:18.080 --> 0:11:21.199
<v Speaker 1>Clapper that this was all on the up and up,

0:11:21.280 --> 0:11:24.040
<v Speaker 1>that there was nothing about this that should have raised

0:11:24.080 --> 0:11:27.360
<v Speaker 1>an eyebrow. Why would anyone think that is the case

0:11:28.080 --> 0:11:32.040
<v Speaker 1>given what we've seen so far. I mean, they briefed

0:11:32.080 --> 0:11:35.600
<v Speaker 1>the president. Just take this one example. James Comey, as

0:11:35.640 --> 0:11:38.920
<v Speaker 1>the FBI director, briefed the President of the United States

0:11:39.000 --> 0:11:45.040
<v Speaker 1>on this dossier and did not tell him, Nor did

0:11:45.080 --> 0:11:47.720
<v Speaker 1>anyone in the intelligence community think it was necessary for

0:11:47.760 --> 0:11:51.640
<v Speaker 1>anyone to know in the public that the dossier was

0:11:51.920 --> 0:11:57.439
<v Speaker 1>a compilation of foreign assembled paid for by the Hillary

0:11:57.520 --> 0:12:05.040
<v Speaker 1>campaign lies. Don't you think that would have affected the

0:12:05.160 --> 0:12:10.680
<v Speaker 1>perception of how much veracity anybody could possibly think was

0:12:10.679 --> 0:12:12.800
<v Speaker 1>in this. Don't you think that if President if someone

0:12:12.800 --> 0:12:15.679
<v Speaker 1>handed President Trump a piece of paper like this and said, Hey,

0:12:15.720 --> 0:12:17.199
<v Speaker 1>I'm the fbid ract. You should just know that the

0:12:17.280 --> 0:12:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Hillary campaign is spreading the stuff about you. You'd say, yeah,

0:12:19.840 --> 0:12:22.400
<v Speaker 1>it's a bunch of lies, it's a bunch of crazy nonsense.

0:12:22.440 --> 0:12:26.160
<v Speaker 1>Why why, James Comey, are you showing this to me? Oh?

0:12:26.240 --> 0:12:29.280
<v Speaker 1>And that's right. CNN ends up reporting on it within hours.

0:12:30.160 --> 0:12:32.760
<v Speaker 1>We're supposed to believe that's a coincidence, just like CNN

0:12:32.800 --> 0:12:38.120
<v Speaker 1>being the only journalistic outfit that happened to be in

0:12:38.200 --> 0:12:42.640
<v Speaker 1>place for the Roger Stone arrest, the circus arrest of

0:12:43.600 --> 0:12:50.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, geriatric sartorial icon Roger Stone with dozens of

0:12:50.400 --> 0:12:53.280
<v Speaker 1>guys heavily armed. I will tell you I spoke to

0:12:53.280 --> 0:12:55.840
<v Speaker 1>some DJ sources and I read them the riot Act

0:12:55.880 --> 0:12:57.880
<v Speaker 1>over that one, and there was a oh, well, it

0:12:57.920 --> 0:12:59.439
<v Speaker 1>was within the bounds of what we could as a

0:12:59.520 --> 0:13:02.160
<v Speaker 1>non non no, no, no, don't pull that. It was

0:13:02.920 --> 0:13:06.880
<v Speaker 1>within the bounds nonsense with me. Oh, I don't want

0:13:06.880 --> 0:13:09.000
<v Speaker 1>to hear that stuff. Guys. We all know what that was.

0:13:09.040 --> 0:13:11.000
<v Speaker 1>We all know what Mauler's team was engaged in there.

0:13:11.080 --> 0:13:13.440
<v Speaker 1>Let's let's not let's not talk to Buck like he's

0:13:13.480 --> 0:13:15.760
<v Speaker 1>a dumb dumb okay, and they I had sometimes I

0:13:15.760 --> 0:13:17.560
<v Speaker 1>got a little test team with some of my my

0:13:17.640 --> 0:13:20.680
<v Speaker 1>sources in this town. I have to I did not

0:13:20.800 --> 0:13:23.640
<v Speaker 1>like that. Well it was it was within the discretion

0:13:23.760 --> 0:13:25.559
<v Speaker 1>of the mother team. No no, no, no, no no, no.

0:13:26.280 --> 0:13:28.880
<v Speaker 1>That should have raised more than eyebrows. That should have

0:13:28.960 --> 0:13:32.880
<v Speaker 1>raised hackles. People should have been ticked off. They could

0:13:32.880 --> 0:13:36.240
<v Speaker 1>have called Roger Stone and said, oh, show up, turn

0:13:36.280 --> 0:13:38.800
<v Speaker 1>yourself in. Everyone knows he would have done it. He's

0:13:38.840 --> 0:13:41.720
<v Speaker 1>not gonna flee. He's not gonna flee and leave all

0:13:41.760 --> 0:13:47.280
<v Speaker 1>of his finely tailored suits behind. Nonsense. But CNN just

0:13:47.360 --> 0:13:49.640
<v Speaker 1>happened to be there. CNN that also happens to have

0:13:49.679 --> 0:13:53.960
<v Speaker 1>a number of former senior FBI you know, administrative assistance

0:13:54.000 --> 0:13:57.080
<v Speaker 1>to James Comi on the payroll, just happens to be there.

0:13:57.200 --> 0:13:59.840
<v Speaker 1>No other no local journalism, no no other networks. Just

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:02.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, I mean, I know they say they just

0:14:02.160 --> 0:14:04.280
<v Speaker 1>got lucky. It was just good journalism. After all the

0:14:04.400 --> 0:14:08.160
<v Speaker 1>other good journalism CNN's done on this issue. Oh man,

0:14:08.240 --> 0:14:13.120
<v Speaker 1>they really, they really pushed the limits, don't they. This

0:14:13.200 --> 0:14:16.480
<v Speaker 1>was spine. I worked for a spy agency. What was

0:14:16.559 --> 0:14:18.959
<v Speaker 1>done to Trump campaign was spine. It was done by

0:14:19.000 --> 0:14:25.800
<v Speaker 1>senior members of the National security apparatus appointed by and

0:14:26.120 --> 0:14:30.720
<v Speaker 1>under the orders of, at least in general, the Obama

0:14:30.720 --> 0:14:36.280
<v Speaker 1>administration and President Obama. These were Obama employees, folks, That

0:14:36.400 --> 0:14:40.360
<v Speaker 1>is a fact. James Clapper comy. These are employees in

0:14:40.440 --> 0:14:43.680
<v Speaker 1>the executive branch of President Barack Obama who spied on

0:14:43.720 --> 0:14:48.920
<v Speaker 1>a presidential campaign based on a delusion, one that should

0:14:48.920 --> 0:14:52.160
<v Speaker 1>have been shut down before it even got started. And

0:14:52.280 --> 0:14:55.000
<v Speaker 1>instead they did everything they could we know this from

0:14:55.040 --> 0:14:57.960
<v Speaker 1>the page struck tex at the FBI, everything they could

0:14:58.160 --> 0:15:01.120
<v Speaker 1>to breathe more life into it, to leak to the press,

0:15:01.960 --> 0:15:06.120
<v Speaker 1>to collude with the anti Trump mainstream media. That was

0:15:06.160 --> 0:15:10.040
<v Speaker 1>what they chose to do. Now they're desperately trying to

0:15:11.000 --> 0:15:13.680
<v Speaker 1>cover it up on the one hand and attack Trump

0:15:13.680 --> 0:15:15.800
<v Speaker 1>for obstruction on the other. I'm sorry, now, we've seen

0:15:15.920 --> 0:15:17.480
<v Speaker 1>enough of their games. We know what they're up to.

0:15:18.480 --> 0:15:21.240
<v Speaker 1>It's not going to work, not on my watch, not

0:15:21.280 --> 0:15:30.280
<v Speaker 1>here in the freedom hunt. We'll be right back. Well,

0:15:30.320 --> 0:15:33.080
<v Speaker 1>that's not the term I would use. Look, there are

0:15:33.120 --> 0:15:36.120
<v Speaker 1>lots of people have different colloquial phrases. I believe that

0:15:36.160 --> 0:15:39.680
<v Speaker 1>the FBI is engaged in investigative activity and part of

0:15:39.720 --> 0:15:43.800
<v Speaker 1>investigative activity includes surveillance activity of different shapes and sizes,

0:15:44.120 --> 0:15:47.400
<v Speaker 1>and to me, the key question is making sure that

0:15:47.480 --> 0:15:50.440
<v Speaker 1>it's done by the book. And at this time, do

0:15:50.600 --> 0:15:54.120
<v Speaker 1>you have any evidence that any illegal surveillance into the

0:15:54.120 --> 0:15:59.280
<v Speaker 1>campaigns or individuals associated with the campaigns by the FBI occurred.

0:16:00.520 --> 0:16:03.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I personally have any evidence of that sort.

0:16:04.560 --> 0:16:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Ah back to the spying debate here, that's FBI Director

0:16:09.920 --> 0:16:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Christopher Ray, who was showing us who he is today,

0:16:15.520 --> 0:16:18.000
<v Speaker 1>and it doesn't surprise me at all. He's an institutionalist.

0:16:18.040 --> 0:16:21.080
<v Speaker 1>He's somebody who's been in government, been in these roles

0:16:21.120 --> 0:16:23.080
<v Speaker 1>for a very long time, comes from within the bureau,

0:16:23.080 --> 0:16:25.080
<v Speaker 1>and is going to protect the bureau because this is,

0:16:25.280 --> 0:16:29.840
<v Speaker 1>from the perspective of public trust, an existential crisis for

0:16:30.000 --> 0:16:34.040
<v Speaker 1>the FBI in the making. What happens when the American

0:16:34.080 --> 0:16:39.200
<v Speaker 1>people find out, as we will, that the FBI can

0:16:39.360 --> 0:16:43.680
<v Speaker 1>vary easily and perhaps even within their regulations and within

0:16:43.720 --> 0:16:47.640
<v Speaker 1>the law, quite easily and legally spy on a presidential campaign.

0:16:47.720 --> 0:16:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Is that supposed to make us feel better? Should we

0:16:51.240 --> 0:16:54.400
<v Speaker 1>feel better about the FBI if, in fact, like a

0:16:54.440 --> 0:16:59.600
<v Speaker 1>bunch of imbeciles, they believed some Internet conspiracy theories that

0:16:59.640 --> 0:17:02.680
<v Speaker 1>were working around during the election, and thought that it

0:17:02.800 --> 0:17:08.000
<v Speaker 1>was a worthwhile usage of resources to send an agent

0:17:08.080 --> 0:17:10.680
<v Speaker 1>to go talk to or send someone acting on behalf

0:17:10.720 --> 0:17:13.000
<v Speaker 1>of the FBI to go talk to Papadopoulos, open up

0:17:13.000 --> 0:17:16.480
<v Speaker 1>a FIZA and get it renewed three times on Carter page.

0:17:18.520 --> 0:17:20.560
<v Speaker 1>I think they should be careful what they wished for here.

0:17:20.720 --> 0:17:24.240
<v Speaker 1>It would be better for the reputation of the FBI,

0:17:24.320 --> 0:17:26.159
<v Speaker 1>and it would be better for public confidence in the

0:17:26.160 --> 0:17:29.760
<v Speaker 1>FBI if, in fact, the Inspector General report were to

0:17:29.800 --> 0:17:32.199
<v Speaker 1>find that there was a rogue actor that you know,

0:17:32.280 --> 0:17:35.639
<v Speaker 1>Comey really was like you know, agent number one running

0:17:35.640 --> 0:17:38.760
<v Speaker 1>around doing all this stuff and lying and falsifying documents,

0:17:38.760 --> 0:17:43.000
<v Speaker 1>And that would because you can root that out. But

0:17:43.119 --> 0:17:45.520
<v Speaker 1>if the law currently is so lax, and if the

0:17:45.520 --> 0:17:48.479
<v Speaker 1>FBI has so little oversight that they can show up

0:17:48.520 --> 0:17:50.040
<v Speaker 1>to a FISA car and be like, yeah, we got

0:17:50.080 --> 0:17:53.600
<v Speaker 1>this like pile of crap that we haven't actually verified

0:17:53.640 --> 0:17:56.600
<v Speaker 1>at all. It's called we'll call it a dossier. And

0:17:56.920 --> 0:17:58.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, the American citizen, we want to pull all

0:17:58.800 --> 0:18:02.159
<v Speaker 1>of his communications for the next few months, and we

0:18:02.200 --> 0:18:04.320
<v Speaker 1>don't know that he's committed a crime or we have

0:18:04.359 --> 0:18:06.719
<v Speaker 1>no reason to believe he has committed any crime. Actually,

0:18:06.720 --> 0:18:10.000
<v Speaker 1>but this paper, this was handed to me by an

0:18:10.000 --> 0:18:12.760
<v Speaker 1>opposition researcher during a presidential campaign, so I figure we'll

0:18:12.760 --> 0:18:16.360
<v Speaker 1>just use this and we'll go from there. That's appalling.

0:18:17.440 --> 0:18:21.000
<v Speaker 1>That's even worse. What this really means, what Christopher Way

0:18:21.080 --> 0:18:22.439
<v Speaker 1>is telling you, is yeah, maybe it was all by

0:18:22.480 --> 0:18:24.240
<v Speaker 1>the book. And in this case, the book means that

0:18:24.280 --> 0:18:27.920
<v Speaker 1>the Fourth Amendment doesn't count anymore. It means that people

0:18:27.920 --> 0:18:31.520
<v Speaker 1>who are unscrupulous can abuse their authority in the government

0:18:31.680 --> 0:18:35.360
<v Speaker 1>to open up spying, because that's what it was on

0:18:35.400 --> 0:18:40.600
<v Speaker 1>the political opposition, on conservatives, on Republicans, on Trump. That's

0:18:40.640 --> 0:18:43.640
<v Speaker 1>even worse than a rogue actor. For a few weeks now,

0:18:43.680 --> 0:18:46.360
<v Speaker 1>I've been reminding you that Mother's Day is fast approaching. Now,

0:18:46.359 --> 0:18:48.840
<v Speaker 1>it's just days away. So what one hundred Flowers is

0:18:48.880 --> 0:18:51.440
<v Speaker 1>here to pick out a gorgeous bouquet for you that'll

0:18:51.440 --> 0:18:54.360
<v Speaker 1>show her she's loved. One eight hundred Flowers still has

0:18:54.400 --> 0:18:58.080
<v Speaker 1>amazing offers on beautiful Mother's Day bouquets and arrangements starting

0:18:58.119 --> 0:19:01.080
<v Speaker 1>at twenty nine ninety nine. Now that's an offer that

0:19:01.160 --> 0:19:03.600
<v Speaker 1>mom would approve of. There's still time to have your

0:19:03.640 --> 0:19:06.160
<v Speaker 1>bouquet delivered on Mother's Day, but you've got to get moving.

0:19:06.480 --> 0:19:09.200
<v Speaker 1>With an amazing selection of sweet streets in bouquets, One

0:19:09.200 --> 0:19:11.960
<v Speaker 1>eight hundred flowers has everything you need for Mother's Day

0:19:12.040 --> 0:19:14.359
<v Speaker 1>and she'll never guess how great of a last minute

0:19:14.359 --> 0:19:17.280
<v Speaker 1>deal you scored. Mother's Day Bouquets and arrangement starting at

0:19:17.280 --> 0:19:19.320
<v Speaker 1>twenty nine ninety nine is an amazing offer, but you

0:19:19.400 --> 0:19:22.159
<v Speaker 1>have to order today. Trust one in hundred flowers to

0:19:22.200 --> 0:19:25.000
<v Speaker 1>make mom feel loved. Order today from one hundred flowers

0:19:25.040 --> 0:19:28.520
<v Speaker 1>dot com to order beautiful and vibrant Mother's Day bouquet

0:19:28.520 --> 0:19:30.760
<v Speaker 1>is starting at twenty nine ninety nine. Go to one

0:19:30.720 --> 0:19:33.280
<v Speaker 1>eight hundred flowers dot com slash buck. That's one eight

0:19:33.400 --> 0:19:37.120
<v Speaker 1>hundred flowers dot com slash buck. Mother's Day is Sunday,

0:19:37.200 --> 0:19:40.480
<v Speaker 1>so order today and save at one eight hundred flowers

0:19:40.560 --> 0:19:54.920
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash buck. He's back with you now, because

0:19:54.960 --> 0:19:57.560
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to the fight for truth, the fuck

0:19:57.720 --> 0:20:03.320
<v Speaker 1>never stops. Did you have a problem away, Comey handled

0:20:03.880 --> 0:20:08.600
<v Speaker 1>the Clintoney mill investigation. Yes, I said so at the time. Okay, so,

0:20:09.200 --> 0:20:11.440
<v Speaker 1>given the fact that a lot of people coming should

0:20:11.440 --> 0:20:14.480
<v Speaker 1>be fired, did you find that to be a persuasive

0:20:15.160 --> 0:20:20.280
<v Speaker 1>act of obstructing justice. No. I think even the report

0:20:20.800 --> 0:20:23.080
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day came to the conclusion,

0:20:23.160 --> 0:20:29.800
<v Speaker 1>if you read the analysis, that a reason that loomed

0:20:29.880 --> 0:20:34.920
<v Speaker 1>large there for his termination was his refusal to tell

0:20:34.960 --> 0:20:38.120
<v Speaker 1>the public what he was privately telling the president, which

0:20:38.240 --> 0:20:42.919
<v Speaker 1>was that the president was not under investigation. Why wouldn't

0:20:43.000 --> 0:20:46.760
<v Speaker 1>Comey tell the public that? Isn't there an important isn't

0:20:46.760 --> 0:20:50.080
<v Speaker 1>there a compelling interest in not having that cloud over

0:20:50.080 --> 0:20:53.119
<v Speaker 1>the commander in chief? You have to remember that for

0:20:53.400 --> 0:20:56.600
<v Speaker 1>the anti Trump forces in this country, in the media

0:20:56.720 --> 0:21:02.280
<v Speaker 1>and government Democratic Party, they think anything that justifies taking

0:21:02.359 --> 0:21:08.760
<v Speaker 1>away the ability to operate freely when it comes to Trump,

0:21:09.480 --> 0:21:13.680
<v Speaker 1>anything is justified. They're fine with it. Whatever it is

0:21:13.760 --> 0:21:15.560
<v Speaker 1>they have to do so that Trump can't really be

0:21:15.600 --> 0:21:18.800
<v Speaker 1>the president. They think is a good thing. They think

0:21:18.800 --> 0:21:21.480
<v Speaker 1>that they have a right to make sure that that

0:21:21.600 --> 0:21:25.480
<v Speaker 1>is the case. And Comey was playing games. He's playing

0:21:25.520 --> 0:21:29.080
<v Speaker 1>games along the whole standing up and reading that statement

0:21:29.119 --> 0:21:32.399
<v Speaker 1>about Hillary and the emails, and that just reminds me

0:21:35.240 --> 0:21:41.480
<v Speaker 1>the gall the hootspa on some of these analysts and

0:21:41.680 --> 0:21:47.119
<v Speaker 1>pundits and news people who are now running around holding

0:21:47.200 --> 0:21:51.920
<v Speaker 1>up this letter written by hundreds of former federal prosecutors

0:21:51.920 --> 0:21:54.639
<v Speaker 1>who have all signed their names to this four hundred

0:21:54.640 --> 0:22:00.240
<v Speaker 1>and fifty former federal prosecutors who have said that there

0:22:00.240 --> 0:22:05.040
<v Speaker 1>should have been obstruction charges would have been obstruction charges

0:22:05.200 --> 0:22:07.919
<v Speaker 1>if not for the fact that Trump is president United States.

0:22:11.119 --> 0:22:13.200
<v Speaker 1>I think it's fascinating that these people think that we're

0:22:13.240 --> 0:22:18.320
<v Speaker 1>supposed to care. I don't give a I don't give what.

0:22:19.160 --> 0:22:21.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't give a you know what about what a

0:22:21.760 --> 0:22:24.159
<v Speaker 1>bunch of lawyers who, by the way, no offense. The

0:22:24.240 --> 0:22:27.600
<v Speaker 1>lawyers listening tend to be Democrats, right American Bar Association

0:22:28.440 --> 0:22:32.119
<v Speaker 1>basically a wing of the DNC. A lot of lawyers

0:22:32.240 --> 0:22:35.800
<v Speaker 1>or Democrats. A lot of prosecutors in particular are Democrats,

0:22:35.880 --> 0:22:39.600
<v Speaker 1>especially in the bluer parts of the country. And I

0:22:39.600 --> 0:22:42.760
<v Speaker 1>don't much care what they think about this. I also

0:22:42.840 --> 0:22:44.760
<v Speaker 1>want to know what their response, if we're going to

0:22:44.760 --> 0:22:47.600
<v Speaker 1>go down this pathway, what their response would be to

0:22:48.160 --> 0:22:50.679
<v Speaker 1>the fact that Mueller himself did not take the position

0:22:50.680 --> 0:22:53.000
<v Speaker 1>that they are asserting. Are they saying that Muller was scared?

0:22:54.280 --> 0:22:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Was Mueller somehow unwilling to speak the truth on this issue?

0:22:57.880 --> 0:23:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Was Saint Muller the Great Anointed Destroyer? Of the Trump administration.

0:23:04.359 --> 0:23:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Oops didn't manage to pull it off. Did he? Did

0:23:09.240 --> 0:23:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Saint Muller get cold feet? He very well could have

0:23:12.840 --> 0:23:15.800
<v Speaker 1>written in that four hundred plus page report we found

0:23:15.880 --> 0:23:18.000
<v Speaker 1>enough evidence to bring charges, but we know the OLC

0:23:18.160 --> 0:23:20.320
<v Speaker 1>guidance from the Department of Justice states that you cannot

0:23:20.359 --> 0:23:23.280
<v Speaker 1>bring charges against the sitting president. So therefore we leave

0:23:23.320 --> 0:23:25.280
<v Speaker 1>this to the American people into Congress to handle as

0:23:25.320 --> 0:23:28.520
<v Speaker 1>they see fit. He didn't say that. He didn't say that.

0:23:30.600 --> 0:23:35.040
<v Speaker 1>I think in part because here's the most persuasive anti

0:23:35.280 --> 0:23:39.280
<v Speaker 1>obstruction charge argument that I know of. Trump didn't obstruct anything.

0:23:40.440 --> 0:23:43.080
<v Speaker 1>I would also like to know what these prosecutors who

0:23:43.119 --> 0:23:45.680
<v Speaker 1>signed this letter that all the media was all excited about.

0:23:45.720 --> 0:23:50.959
<v Speaker 1>It was posted Monday afternoon, including Bill Weld, who is

0:23:51.119 --> 0:23:54.240
<v Speaker 1>running against Trump. Oh, well, he must be really objective.

0:23:55.160 --> 0:23:58.400
<v Speaker 1>He's a former US attorney in the Reagan administration who's

0:23:58.440 --> 0:24:02.560
<v Speaker 1>running against Trump for the Republican Nation. Yeah, he's a

0:24:04.119 --> 0:24:05.960
<v Speaker 1>he's a guy that you can look to to be

0:24:06.920 --> 0:24:10.480
<v Speaker 1>totally honest and fair minded in this whole process. Uh,

0:24:10.880 --> 0:24:12.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is just a This is just a

0:24:13.080 --> 0:24:16.919
<v Speaker 1>pr and a propaganda exercise. These are people who obviously

0:24:17.000 --> 0:24:20.040
<v Speaker 1>don't like the president, and they think that because they've

0:24:20.080 --> 0:24:23.080
<v Speaker 1>worked in government in some capacity as prosecutors, that their

0:24:23.160 --> 0:24:27.800
<v Speaker 1>judgment is now beyond partisanship. And that's just that's just silly.

0:24:28.720 --> 0:24:32.360
<v Speaker 1>No reasonable person would think that that's what's going on here.

0:24:33.400 --> 0:24:37.040
<v Speaker 1>It's it's not It shouldn't be their expectation that in

0:24:37.080 --> 0:24:41.119
<v Speaker 1>a country of three hundred and twenty or so million people,

0:24:42.080 --> 0:24:44.680
<v Speaker 1>because a few hundred people that happen to have law

0:24:44.720 --> 0:24:49.760
<v Speaker 1>degrees and had worked in government prosecution, think that there

0:24:49.760 --> 0:24:51.760
<v Speaker 1>would have been obstruction charges here? That what does that?

0:24:51.920 --> 0:24:55.479
<v Speaker 1>What does that mean? So do we have the evidence

0:24:55.480 --> 0:24:58.920
<v Speaker 1>now to bring those charges because Mueller didn't? Is there

0:24:58.960 --> 0:25:03.200
<v Speaker 1>new evidence? No, there's not. This is there's a level

0:25:03.200 --> 0:25:05.840
<v Speaker 1>of this is kind of sad, and I know that

0:25:05.840 --> 0:25:07.879
<v Speaker 1>that's not the way you usually hear this discuss. But

0:25:08.680 --> 0:25:11.040
<v Speaker 1>there were all these stories towards the end of the

0:25:11.080 --> 0:25:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Muller Probe about how there were people who were worried

0:25:14.960 --> 0:25:17.280
<v Speaker 1>that they would older people were worried they would die

0:25:17.359 --> 0:25:19.840
<v Speaker 1>before seeing justice and the Mulla Probe could be released

0:25:19.880 --> 0:25:21.879
<v Speaker 1>and finally set things right in the land. You know,

0:25:22.440 --> 0:25:26.040
<v Speaker 1>this is almost like it's the end of a Shakespearean drama.

0:25:26.040 --> 0:25:28.080
<v Speaker 1>It's like the end of Hamlet, where the last act

0:25:28.160 --> 0:25:31.600
<v Speaker 1>on stage is to set things, you know, set things

0:25:31.680 --> 0:25:34.200
<v Speaker 1>right going forward, set things right into the future after

0:25:34.240 --> 0:25:38.840
<v Speaker 1>all the tragedy and loss. This isn't a stage drama.

0:25:39.320 --> 0:25:41.720
<v Speaker 1>This is this is real life, and there are much

0:25:41.760 --> 0:25:45.040
<v Speaker 1>more There should be much more important things to really

0:25:45.040 --> 0:25:48.520
<v Speaker 1>everybody in America, especially if they're in their last days.

0:25:48.560 --> 0:25:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Then whether or not the Mulla report has come out,

0:25:51.880 --> 0:25:55.520
<v Speaker 1>this was a mass hysteria. This was along the lines

0:25:55.560 --> 0:25:59.120
<v Speaker 1>of another mass hysteria that is getting some attention now

0:25:59.119 --> 0:26:01.080
<v Speaker 1>that I won't have the time to go into today,

0:26:01.119 --> 0:26:03.359
<v Speaker 1>but it's that we're in the midst of a of

0:26:03.440 --> 0:26:08.680
<v Speaker 1>a massive species die off and that if we don't

0:26:08.760 --> 0:26:12.760
<v Speaker 1>do something soon. This is an assessment some report that

0:26:12.880 --> 0:26:15.720
<v Speaker 1>just came out that's that said that humans are having

0:26:15.760 --> 0:26:21.320
<v Speaker 1>a quote unprecedented and devastating effect on global biodiversity, with

0:26:21.400 --> 0:26:24.720
<v Speaker 1>about a million animal and plant species threatened with extinction.

0:26:26.480 --> 0:26:28.760
<v Speaker 1>You know what they don't really get into the report

0:26:28.840 --> 0:26:30.920
<v Speaker 1>is that nine p nine percent of all species that

0:26:30.960 --> 0:26:35.439
<v Speaker 1>have ever existed our extinct, extinction for species over time

0:26:35.560 --> 0:26:42.280
<v Speaker 1>and the different processes of new species coming to light.

0:26:42.320 --> 0:26:45.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is the way it's always been. But

0:26:45.800 --> 0:26:48.200
<v Speaker 1>they want you to think that all the all the planets,

0:26:48.280 --> 0:26:51.040
<v Speaker 1>animals are going to die because of us. It's our fault. Oh,

0:26:51.080 --> 0:26:52.680
<v Speaker 1>how do we fix it? Who wants to take a guess?

0:26:53.160 --> 0:26:55.159
<v Speaker 1>How do we stop a million animals and plant a

0:26:55.160 --> 0:26:59.360
<v Speaker 1>million animal and plant species from going extinct? Well, that's right,

0:26:59.359 --> 0:27:02.960
<v Speaker 1>climate chance change, climate change legislation, which is also a

0:27:02.960 --> 0:27:05.679
<v Speaker 1>way to help struggling and minority and oppress communities in

0:27:05.680 --> 0:27:09.439
<v Speaker 1>this kind, it's just it's a justification for everything, for

0:27:09.480 --> 0:27:13.480
<v Speaker 1>all things. Climate change, in the parlance of late eighteenth

0:27:13.560 --> 0:27:18.560
<v Speaker 1>century France or early twentieth century Russia, is the revolution.

0:27:19.040 --> 0:27:21.000
<v Speaker 1>It's whatever they want it to be. It gives them

0:27:21.000 --> 0:27:23.120
<v Speaker 1>the power to do anything that they seek to do.

0:27:23.400 --> 0:27:25.919
<v Speaker 1>And if you stand athwart it, you are a threat.

0:27:26.320 --> 0:27:28.879
<v Speaker 1>You are a counter revolutionary, You are a bad person.

0:27:28.920 --> 0:27:32.879
<v Speaker 1>You must be destroyed. Do you want a million animal

0:27:32.920 --> 0:27:35.320
<v Speaker 1>and plant species to go extinct? Well, I hope not.

0:27:36.400 --> 0:27:39.160
<v Speaker 1>The only way to solve it is to empower imbeciles

0:27:39.200 --> 0:27:44.359
<v Speaker 1>like Ocasio Cortez and Nancy Pelosi. Otherwise you want all

0:27:44.400 --> 0:27:46.639
<v Speaker 1>the animals and plants to die. They believe that this

0:27:46.840 --> 0:27:50.440
<v Speaker 1>is not what normal people would think about the world

0:27:50.440 --> 0:27:55.960
<v Speaker 1>around them. This is the result of massive media propaganda

0:27:56.000 --> 0:28:01.240
<v Speaker 1>and brainwashing and the rejection of reason in and thought

0:28:01.880 --> 0:28:07.600
<v Speaker 1>and science and the scientific method. That same ability to

0:28:07.840 --> 0:28:11.440
<v Speaker 1>get completely panicked about the prospect of all species dying

0:28:11.480 --> 0:28:13.919
<v Speaker 1>off because of us, because we're so terrible human beings.

0:28:14.680 --> 0:28:18.280
<v Speaker 1>That same mentality is unfortunately tied to the Mulla Report,

0:28:18.320 --> 0:28:20.840
<v Speaker 1>which is, even though it's not true, they still think

0:28:20.880 --> 0:28:24.120
<v Speaker 1>there must be something there. It must be true. We'll

0:28:24.160 --> 0:28:26.680
<v Speaker 1>go right back. So our leader says, let's move on.

0:28:27.280 --> 0:28:29.920
<v Speaker 1>It's sort of like Richard Nixon saying let's move on

0:28:30.400 --> 0:28:34.160
<v Speaker 1>at the height of the investigation of his wrongdoing. Of course,

0:28:34.240 --> 0:28:36.720
<v Speaker 1>he wants to move on. He wants to cover up,

0:28:37.240 --> 0:28:40.440
<v Speaker 1>He wants to silence on one of the most serious

0:28:40.440 --> 0:28:44.760
<v Speaker 1>issues we face. Chuck Schumer saying that McConnell is trying

0:28:44.800 --> 0:28:47.160
<v Speaker 1>to engage in some kind of a cover up here

0:28:48.560 --> 0:28:53.640
<v Speaker 1>because because cocaine Mitch, aka said a majority leader, Mitch McConnell,

0:28:54.320 --> 0:28:57.280
<v Speaker 1>he's more fun to call him cocaine Mitch. He said

0:28:57.280 --> 0:29:00.000
<v Speaker 1>it's time to move on. This case close. He's right.

0:29:00.560 --> 0:29:05.800
<v Speaker 1>The case is closed. Two years, thousands and thousands of

0:29:06.200 --> 0:29:09.040
<v Speaker 1>pages of documents, and the subpoenas and the hundreds of

0:29:09.040 --> 0:29:13.240
<v Speaker 1>witnesses and all this stuff. Muller went scorched earth released

0:29:13.240 --> 0:29:17.520
<v Speaker 1>this four hundred page long anti Trump editorial effectively, but

0:29:17.560 --> 0:29:20.680
<v Speaker 1>it was not able to find a crime to charge either,

0:29:20.800 --> 0:29:23.960
<v Speaker 1>just the facts and how much. McConnell's like, can we

0:29:24.000 --> 0:29:26.360
<v Speaker 1>just please do other things this country? And Chuck Schumer

0:29:27.400 --> 0:29:30.920
<v Speaker 1>because he knows that a lot of his constituents, a

0:29:30.920 --> 0:29:32.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of people, unfortunately in my home state of New York,

0:29:32.960 --> 0:29:36.800
<v Speaker 1>have Trump's arrangement syndrome. They'll just they'll never stop with this,

0:29:38.000 --> 0:29:44.600
<v Speaker 1>They'll never give this up. They think that Congress is

0:29:44.640 --> 0:29:46.600
<v Speaker 1>going to or at least the Democrats in Congress going

0:29:46.640 --> 0:29:51.080
<v Speaker 1>to get some degree of truth, some nugget that was

0:29:51.160 --> 0:29:55.160
<v Speaker 1>missed by Muller and his whole squad. This is absurd.

0:29:56.600 --> 0:29:59.040
<v Speaker 1>This is absurd, But it's like the absurdity of those

0:29:59.080 --> 0:30:03.000
<v Speaker 1>who are calling for a bar to be fired. They

0:30:03.080 --> 0:30:05.000
<v Speaker 1>say that Mitch McConnell is part of the cover up,

0:30:05.920 --> 0:30:09.920
<v Speaker 1>they say that Bill Barr is part of the cover up.

0:30:11.240 --> 0:30:14.160
<v Speaker 1>They attack anyone who just says, you know, when is

0:30:14.280 --> 0:30:17.400
<v Speaker 1>enough enough? I mean, here, here's here to say. Montage

0:30:17.640 --> 0:30:20.479
<v Speaker 1>Democrats are not just content to try and drag the

0:30:20.520 --> 0:30:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Attorney General's reputation through the mud. They like a bunch

0:30:24.280 --> 0:30:29.080
<v Speaker 1>of screeching lunatics, really do want, at least from what

0:30:29.160 --> 0:30:33.280
<v Speaker 1>they say, to lock Bar up in prison, which is

0:30:33.320 --> 0:30:39.400
<v Speaker 1>just utterly absurd. I mean, just completely crazy town. And

0:30:39.520 --> 0:30:41.120
<v Speaker 1>it's not like one or two of them are saying it.

0:30:41.200 --> 0:30:43.320
<v Speaker 1>A lot of them are saying. At Playlipate, are you

0:30:43.320 --> 0:30:45.520
<v Speaker 1>talking about just having him sit for a hearing or

0:30:45.920 --> 0:30:48.280
<v Speaker 1>locking him up somehow? And you have to have him

0:30:48.520 --> 0:30:49.880
<v Speaker 1>sit for a hearing, and I think you have to

0:30:49.920 --> 0:30:53.280
<v Speaker 1>have him locked up, and unless he agrees to participate

0:30:53.320 --> 0:30:56.200
<v Speaker 1>and come to the hearing. The House and the Senate,

0:30:56.240 --> 0:31:01.560
<v Speaker 1>each chamber has an inherent power to compare a witness

0:31:01.560 --> 0:31:05.720
<v Speaker 1>to testify. If that witness just refuses, and that includes

0:31:05.880 --> 0:31:09.480
<v Speaker 1>arrests and then even includes jail, the House is powerless

0:31:09.600 --> 0:31:13.120
<v Speaker 1>unless the House takes some action. We have what's called

0:31:13.200 --> 0:31:17.160
<v Speaker 1>inherent contempt proceedings, which means we send the sergeant of

0:31:17.280 --> 0:31:24.240
<v Speaker 1>arms out to handcuff the individual who is declining to Well,

0:31:24.280 --> 0:31:29.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to start with mister Barr. These are people

0:31:29.320 --> 0:31:32.360
<v Speaker 1>who are These are democrats who are really saying they

0:31:32.400 --> 0:31:35.040
<v Speaker 1>want to send the sergeant sergeant at arms in Congress

0:31:36.320 --> 0:31:41.520
<v Speaker 1>to go arrest the Attorney General. No, no, I understand

0:31:41.560 --> 0:31:45.360
<v Speaker 1>that at some level, this is just theatrics. This is

0:31:45.400 --> 0:31:50.880
<v Speaker 1>for the people, the very, very simple minded and easily

0:31:50.920 --> 0:31:55.600
<v Speaker 1>brainwashed folks who watch MSNBC constantly, who think that they're

0:31:55.640 --> 0:31:58.680
<v Speaker 1>getting objective It's one thing if you watch MSNBC and

0:31:58.760 --> 0:32:01.520
<v Speaker 1>you realize that you're watching lewing propaganda, at least you

0:32:01.680 --> 0:32:04.000
<v Speaker 1>have some self awareness. But there are a lot of

0:32:04.000 --> 0:32:06.760
<v Speaker 1>people who watch MSNBC and think that it's objective news,

0:32:07.280 --> 0:32:10.200
<v Speaker 1>and I feel bad for them because their understanding of

0:32:10.200 --> 0:32:13.720
<v Speaker 1>politics and the world around them is deeply unsophisticated. They

0:32:13.760 --> 0:32:17.160
<v Speaker 1>think they're really sophisticated, but they are not. But here

0:32:17.200 --> 0:32:20.600
<v Speaker 1>you have people that are pandering to that unsophisticated but

0:32:21.120 --> 0:32:24.680
<v Speaker 1>very self righteous crowd of MSNBC true believers by saying

0:32:24.680 --> 0:32:26.200
<v Speaker 1>that they're gonna they're gonna try to lock up the

0:32:26.240 --> 0:32:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Attorney general, as if that wouldn't create a constitutional crisis.

0:32:30.720 --> 0:32:33.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, the same the same Democrat left that has

0:32:33.440 --> 0:32:36.360
<v Speaker 1>been whining about the undermining of institutions for the last

0:32:36.400 --> 0:32:39.280
<v Speaker 1>two years just as a favorite talking point. You know,

0:32:39.320 --> 0:32:41.920
<v Speaker 1>they just they try to make it sound like they're

0:32:41.960 --> 0:32:45.320
<v Speaker 1>the only people who care about the institutions of government. Oh,

0:32:45.440 --> 0:32:48.400
<v Speaker 1>it still comes to election results. They don't like then it.

0:32:48.560 --> 0:32:51.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, the Georgia election was stolen, the North Carolina

0:32:51.520 --> 0:32:54.080
<v Speaker 1>election was to all these elections are stolen, stolen, stolen,

0:32:54.120 --> 0:32:57.320
<v Speaker 1>that they don't win the twenty sixteen presidential election stolen.

0:32:58.200 --> 0:33:01.440
<v Speaker 1>You think that maybe that in and of itself would

0:33:02.040 --> 0:33:04.840
<v Speaker 1>constitute some kind of undermining of our institutions, like the

0:33:04.880 --> 0:33:09.160
<v Speaker 1>institutions of our election. But Democrats, come on, we're not

0:33:09.200 --> 0:33:11.160
<v Speaker 1>looking for consistency with them. Will be looking all day,

0:33:11.200 --> 0:33:15.280
<v Speaker 1>my friends, We're not gonna find it. They want to

0:33:15.280 --> 0:33:18.120
<v Speaker 1>throw the Attorney General in jail, why, you might ask,

0:33:18.200 --> 0:33:22.560
<v Speaker 1>because he won't sit there and allow them to engage

0:33:22.600 --> 0:33:28.520
<v Speaker 1>in the obvious shenanigans of having staff attorneys cross examined

0:33:28.520 --> 0:33:32.440
<v Speaker 1>the Attorney General of the United States. That's right, that's

0:33:32.480 --> 0:33:35.120
<v Speaker 1>what they think that should be done. Here. You have

0:33:35.160 --> 0:33:37.760
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of lawyers, these members of Congress, they're almost

0:33:37.800 --> 0:33:39.760
<v Speaker 1>all lawyers, like seventy percent of the ones who sit

0:33:39.840 --> 0:33:45.560
<v Speaker 1>on the Judiciary Committee our lawyers. And they won't do

0:33:45.600 --> 0:33:48.160
<v Speaker 1>the questioning themselves. They want to have somebody else do

0:33:48.200 --> 0:33:51.000
<v Speaker 1>it for them. They want to do that because they

0:33:51.040 --> 0:33:53.400
<v Speaker 1>want it to seem like a criminal proceeding in Bar

0:33:53.800 --> 0:33:58.200
<v Speaker 1>is a defendant in that they can't beat Bar on

0:33:58.240 --> 0:34:01.640
<v Speaker 1>the merits. So now they're just trying every every campaign

0:34:01.680 --> 0:34:07.760
<v Speaker 1>of insinuation, Slanders sliming their conduct on this is utterly disgraceful.

0:34:08.960 --> 0:34:12.560
<v Speaker 1>And they're, oh, we actually have Mitch McConnell on what

0:34:12.640 --> 0:34:16.120
<v Speaker 1>he thinks about all this and why they're going after Bar. Right,

0:34:16.160 --> 0:34:18.839
<v Speaker 1>Chuck Schumer got all upset about what Minch McConnell said.

0:34:18.920 --> 0:34:20.799
<v Speaker 1>Let me play for you what Cochi and Mitch had

0:34:20.840 --> 0:34:23.560
<v Speaker 1>to say. Play seven. Now, I've been more than six

0:34:23.600 --> 0:34:28.320
<v Speaker 1>weeks since Special Counsel Bob Mueller, the former FBI director,

0:34:28.680 --> 0:34:33.200
<v Speaker 1>concluded his investigation into Russia's interference in our twenty sixteen

0:34:33.280 --> 0:34:39.279
<v Speaker 1>election and delivered his findings to the Justice Department. It's

0:34:39.320 --> 0:34:42.880
<v Speaker 1>been two weeks since Attorney General William Barr made the

0:34:42.960 --> 0:34:47.399
<v Speaker 1>four hundred and fifty page report public. This investigation went

0:34:47.440 --> 0:34:53.640
<v Speaker 1>on for two years. It's finally over, case closed, all right,

0:34:53.760 --> 0:34:58.600
<v Speaker 1>it's time for this thing to be done. They said

0:34:58.640 --> 0:35:01.040
<v Speaker 1>there was a conspiracy. Now they're going after bar because

0:35:01.040 --> 0:35:03.080
<v Speaker 1>he's a convenient targets more than he's a convenient target.

0:35:03.120 --> 0:35:06.200
<v Speaker 1>They're going after bar because they have to run interference

0:35:06.239 --> 0:35:10.000
<v Speaker 1>for the little Democrat deep state clients who were the

0:35:10.000 --> 0:35:12.560
<v Speaker 1>ones that generated this whole conspiracy in the first place.

0:35:13.360 --> 0:35:15.759
<v Speaker 1>They're the ones that created this whole narrative. They're the

0:35:15.800 --> 0:35:20.920
<v Speaker 1>ones that came up with this Russia collusion fantasy. And

0:35:21.200 --> 0:35:23.880
<v Speaker 1>the Inspector General report from within the Department of Justice,

0:35:23.920 --> 0:35:26.839
<v Speaker 1>I think is going to show that some of these

0:35:26.880 --> 0:35:32.600
<v Speaker 1>people were just way outside the bounds of what is

0:35:32.640 --> 0:35:34.800
<v Speaker 1>ethical given the power they have. I'm not so you

0:35:34.880 --> 0:35:36.160
<v Speaker 1>notice how I'm not telling you they're going to go

0:35:36.200 --> 0:35:42.160
<v Speaker 1>to prison very hard. You know, prosecutors, FBI agents, they

0:35:42.200 --> 0:35:48.000
<v Speaker 1>can engage in a lot of really poor conduct and

0:35:48.120 --> 0:35:50.080
<v Speaker 1>the worst thing that will happen is they'll get fired.

0:35:50.800 --> 0:35:53.880
<v Speaker 1>For prosecutors, it's usually not even that prosecutors. There's so

0:35:54.040 --> 0:35:57.680
<v Speaker 1>little oversight of what federal prosecutors do and their decision making.

0:35:58.280 --> 0:36:01.640
<v Speaker 1>But even within the FBI, within those federal bureaucracies, you

0:36:02.400 --> 0:36:07.080
<v Speaker 1>can mess up and then some and they're not necessarily

0:36:07.080 --> 0:36:09.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna come after you with anything other than a possible

0:36:09.719 --> 0:36:12.640
<v Speaker 1>suspension maybe of firing. Very unlikely. I think you'll see

0:36:12.680 --> 0:36:14.759
<v Speaker 1>anyone go to I know other people tell you, oh,

0:36:14.840 --> 0:36:16.960
<v Speaker 1>Coomy's going to jail, and no, I don't think so.

0:36:17.360 --> 0:36:19.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's gonna happen. Coomy's gonna look really

0:36:19.480 --> 0:36:22.000
<v Speaker 1>bad on this whole process. But the attacks on bar

0:36:22.239 --> 0:36:26.640
<v Speaker 1>are meant to prepare the battleground for when Bar is

0:36:26.719 --> 0:36:30.520
<v Speaker 1>releasing or as Attorney General is at a press conference

0:36:30.560 --> 0:36:34.239
<v Speaker 1>and talking about the Inspector General report and what is

0:36:34.239 --> 0:36:36.239
<v Speaker 1>in it, and it's going to look really bad for Democrats.

0:36:36.640 --> 0:36:39.880
<v Speaker 1>And it's gonna look also terrible for the media in

0:36:39.960 --> 0:36:42.160
<v Speaker 1>that the members of the media were so willing to

0:36:42.200 --> 0:36:46.719
<v Speaker 1>go along with his especially in the early stages, this

0:36:46.800 --> 0:36:52.840
<v Speaker 1>crazy Russia collusion story and use all this pretextual nonsense

0:36:52.880 --> 0:36:58.279
<v Speaker 1>about Papadopolis and Carter Page as as evidence in this conspiracy,

0:36:58.840 --> 0:37:01.319
<v Speaker 1>as evidence to present to the Fiser Corp. But also

0:37:01.400 --> 0:37:04.720
<v Speaker 1>is evidence to present the public in all these different

0:37:04.760 --> 0:37:08.560
<v Speaker 1>news articles. Just absurd, absolutely absurd. It should be case closed,

0:37:09.120 --> 0:37:13.000
<v Speaker 1>But because the Democrats just can't let it go, we're

0:37:13.000 --> 0:37:14.400
<v Speaker 1>going to have to continue to talk about this, but

0:37:14.440 --> 0:37:16.399
<v Speaker 1>we will continue to fight them. My friends, don't worry

0:37:16.400 --> 0:37:19.920
<v Speaker 1>about it. Obviously, border security is top of mind for

0:37:19.960 --> 0:37:24.000
<v Speaker 1>this president since January. Democrats are now seventeen points more

0:37:24.040 --> 0:37:26.239
<v Speaker 1>likely to refer to what's happening at the southern border

0:37:26.239 --> 0:37:29.040
<v Speaker 1>as a quote crisis. Remember that it was in January

0:37:29.440 --> 0:37:32.960
<v Speaker 1>that Schumer and Pelosi went on primetime television following the

0:37:33.440 --> 0:37:36.600
<v Speaker 1>President's Oval Office address and said, this is a manufacturer crisis.

0:37:36.600 --> 0:37:40.160
<v Speaker 1>So border security top of mind, but also the President

0:37:40.200 --> 0:37:43.560
<v Speaker 1>will be considering a merit based immigration system. He put.

0:37:43.600 --> 0:37:46.120
<v Speaker 1>The President put together a seventy point plan and submitted

0:37:46.239 --> 0:37:49.200
<v Speaker 1>to Congress in October of twenty seventeen. So anybody who

0:37:49.200 --> 0:37:52.120
<v Speaker 1>seems surprised that this president wants to end the VS

0:37:52.200 --> 0:37:57.200
<v Speaker 1>lottery system, end chain migration, have a merit based immigration system,

0:37:57.320 --> 0:38:01.040
<v Speaker 1>a deal with DOCCA as he can, and certainly continue.

0:38:01.160 --> 0:38:03.400
<v Speaker 1>So that's on the table. Order so Daco'll be on

0:38:03.440 --> 0:38:05.759
<v Speaker 1>the table. I get ahead of it, but it could

0:38:05.800 --> 0:38:10.239
<v Speaker 1>be we'll see. Trump better be careful these negotiations over

0:38:10.280 --> 0:38:13.840
<v Speaker 1>immigration because the Democrats have no good faith whatsoever on

0:38:13.880 --> 0:38:17.160
<v Speaker 1>this issue. They do not want the same thing that

0:38:17.239 --> 0:38:19.040
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the or that a majority of the

0:38:19.080 --> 0:38:23.719
<v Speaker 1>American people want. They aren't looking for a border that

0:38:24.440 --> 0:38:27.880
<v Speaker 1>is secure, that does not allow the continued influx of illegals,

0:38:27.880 --> 0:38:32.520
<v Speaker 1>that does not reward people for crossing in massive numbers illegally.

0:38:33.920 --> 0:38:36.360
<v Speaker 1>We're not trying to achieve the same thing. This is

0:38:37.160 --> 0:38:40.880
<v Speaker 1>absolutely central. It's fundamental to understand this. On a lot

0:38:40.920 --> 0:38:44.799
<v Speaker 1>of policy issues, the Democrats and the Republicans are separated

0:38:44.840 --> 0:38:50.120
<v Speaker 1>by the means to achieve the same end. On this issue,

0:38:50.160 --> 0:38:52.759
<v Speaker 1>on immigration, we no longer differ on the means. We

0:38:52.800 --> 0:38:56.839
<v Speaker 1>differ on the ends. We don't want the same goal,

0:38:56.920 --> 0:39:00.520
<v Speaker 1>we don't want the same immigration reality. And so when

0:39:00.520 --> 0:39:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Trump is talking about, or when the administration that was

0:39:02.760 --> 0:39:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Kelly and Conway's discussing what Trump would be willing to

0:39:07.600 --> 0:39:10.319
<v Speaker 1>a budge on or what's on the table, I get it.

0:39:10.360 --> 0:39:12.879
<v Speaker 1>He's a negotiator. He wants to make his pitch, but

0:39:13.040 --> 0:39:16.560
<v Speaker 1>he needs to be very careful. I'm don't get mad

0:39:16.560 --> 0:39:21.640
<v Speaker 1>at me, but Saint Reagan, wonderful man, wonderful president, got swindled,

0:39:22.400 --> 0:39:27.400
<v Speaker 1>got swindled with an amnesty back in nineteen eighties six.

0:39:27.520 --> 0:39:32.239
<v Speaker 1>I think it was millions of people amnestied, no real

0:39:32.280 --> 0:39:36.960
<v Speaker 1>improvements of border security, nothing in terms of the verification

0:39:37.160 --> 0:39:40.640
<v Speaker 1>and enforcement measures for those that were possibly covered by

0:39:40.680 --> 0:39:43.839
<v Speaker 1>the amnesty. And they were still hearing amnesty cases as

0:39:43.840 --> 0:39:46.160
<v Speaker 1>of I think twenty ten or twenty eleven from that

0:39:46.200 --> 0:39:49.120
<v Speaker 1>initial amnesty in the eighties. All Right, everyone's like, oh, yeah,

0:39:49.120 --> 0:39:50.960
<v Speaker 1>I should have been covered by that. Now let me

0:39:51.040 --> 0:39:55.080
<v Speaker 1>have a you know, a lawyer appointed to represent me

0:39:55.120 --> 0:39:58.000
<v Speaker 1>in court. It's just this is what ends up happening.

0:39:58.719 --> 0:40:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Democrats just want amnesty. They'll say anything to get there,

0:40:00.960 --> 0:40:04.279
<v Speaker 1>because everything else is negotiable. Every other aspect of the

0:40:04.280 --> 0:40:07.920
<v Speaker 1>border can change. They want ambassy and they don't want

0:40:07.920 --> 0:40:10.839
<v Speaker 1>a wall because tearing down the wall that might be tough.

0:40:11.520 --> 0:40:13.600
<v Speaker 1>That's a tough sell. Yeah, we've just built this wall.

0:40:13.640 --> 0:40:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Now we're going to tear it down that that wouldn't

0:40:15.160 --> 0:40:17.640
<v Speaker 1>be an easy thing for Democrats to pull off. The

0:40:17.719 --> 0:40:22.439
<v Speaker 1>optics of that are not strong. But yeah, I think

0:40:22.440 --> 0:40:26.520
<v Speaker 1>that Trump Trump's gonna have a tough time here. Democrats

0:40:26.560 --> 0:40:33.080
<v Speaker 1>don't want to be working with him on anything with

0:40:33.239 --> 0:40:35.000
<v Speaker 1>regard to immigration. They want this to be a major

0:40:35.040 --> 0:40:38.880
<v Speaker 1>issue going into the midterms, rather the presidential election, not

0:40:38.920 --> 0:40:41.560
<v Speaker 1>the midterms. New York Post as an interesting piece here,

0:40:41.600 --> 0:40:45.840
<v Speaker 1>speaking of the border, Central American migrants have Mexico facing

0:40:45.880 --> 0:40:52.440
<v Speaker 1>a border crisis of its own. This is in sidad

0:40:52.680 --> 0:40:55.479
<v Speaker 1>hidaa go Mexico. I I do not I took French,

0:40:55.560 --> 0:40:58.960
<v Speaker 1>not Spanish. That'll make fun of my Tijuana. I know

0:40:59.040 --> 0:41:03.120
<v Speaker 1>it's Tijuana. I gotta say it like that, Tejuana. When

0:41:03.120 --> 0:41:07.799
<v Speaker 1>the migrant caravans crossed the Succuiote River and International Bridge

0:41:07.800 --> 0:41:11.960
<v Speaker 1>from Guatemala, Aidan Lopez springs into action. In this steamy

0:41:11.960 --> 0:41:15.120
<v Speaker 1>tropical city, he shuts down his shop and takes cover.

0:41:16.000 --> 0:41:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Like many merchants along Mexico's southern border, Lopez says his

0:41:19.640 --> 0:41:23.840
<v Speaker 1>business is suffering due to a recent escalation in crime

0:41:23.920 --> 0:41:28.000
<v Speaker 1>committed by migrants. Many are calling for the Mexican government

0:41:28.040 --> 0:41:32.839
<v Speaker 1>to shut its doors. Lopez owns a stall selling blue

0:41:32.920 --> 0:41:34.920
<v Speaker 1>jeans in this city of nearly fifteen thousand people on

0:41:35.000 --> 0:41:38.960
<v Speaker 1>the southern tip of Mexico. Since last October, thousands of

0:41:38.960 --> 0:41:42.319
<v Speaker 1>mostly Central American asylum seekers have overwhelmed the city, which

0:41:42.400 --> 0:41:45.239
<v Speaker 1>is just steps from a bridge connecting Mexico to Guatemala.

0:41:45.239 --> 0:41:47.440
<v Speaker 1>With no other place to go, many camp out in

0:41:47.480 --> 0:41:50.560
<v Speaker 1>the town square and beg quote, we know they are

0:41:50.600 --> 0:41:53.680
<v Speaker 1>not all bad people, but when they started to come through,

0:41:53.719 --> 0:41:56.200
<v Speaker 1>there were a lot of robberies and assaults, Lopez told

0:41:56.239 --> 0:41:58.600
<v Speaker 1>the New York Post. Here so now we get a

0:41:58.680 --> 0:42:02.720
<v Speaker 1>multitude crossing, we just clo the shop. Wait a second,

0:42:02.760 --> 0:42:05.080
<v Speaker 1>I thought that these this is all this New York

0:42:05.080 --> 0:42:09.600
<v Speaker 1>postpiece by Isabel Vincent. I thought that the migrants were

0:42:10.040 --> 0:42:12.160
<v Speaker 1>better than Americans. I thought that they were going to

0:42:12.239 --> 0:42:14.319
<v Speaker 1>just do the jobs we won't do, work harder than

0:42:14.320 --> 0:42:16.920
<v Speaker 1>we work, be more law abiding than we are. This

0:42:16.960 --> 0:42:20.680
<v Speaker 1>is what we're always told, is whether Democrats consistently say

0:42:21.280 --> 0:42:25.040
<v Speaker 1>about migrants that come across the border illegally, that come

0:42:25.080 --> 0:42:29.040
<v Speaker 1>as part of these caravans, that they're amazing and we

0:42:29.760 --> 0:42:33.680
<v Speaker 1>are deficient because we do not understand how amazing they are,

0:42:33.719 --> 0:42:37.040
<v Speaker 1>even though they're breaking our laws, even though we are

0:42:37.080 --> 0:42:42.640
<v Speaker 1>not supposed to bring in one hundred thousand illegal crossing

0:42:42.880 --> 0:42:48.480
<v Speaker 1>illegal crossers a month. But where's the Trump administration on this?

0:42:49.880 --> 0:42:53.360
<v Speaker 1>What are we going to do about this? The money

0:42:53.400 --> 0:42:56.680
<v Speaker 1>that they're talking about moving to the border is just

0:42:56.800 --> 0:43:02.359
<v Speaker 1>going to grease the wheels of process. The only area

0:43:02.440 --> 0:43:05.640
<v Speaker 1>where I've started to see some real movement that I

0:43:05.640 --> 0:43:08.040
<v Speaker 1>think could be helpful, it could be useful to securing

0:43:08.080 --> 0:43:16.200
<v Speaker 1>the border is in stricter enforcement, stricter enforcement of credible

0:43:16.239 --> 0:43:21.279
<v Speaker 1>fear claims that may actually be worthwhile. That has the

0:43:21.320 --> 0:43:25.760
<v Speaker 1>possibility I think of starting to turn back this tidal

0:43:25.800 --> 0:43:29.560
<v Speaker 1>wave of people coming into the country illegally. Essentially just

0:43:29.640 --> 0:43:31.600
<v Speaker 1>make it harder for them to get through and lie.

0:43:33.080 --> 0:43:35.440
<v Speaker 1>That's all it is. That in and of itself, I

0:43:35.480 --> 0:43:40.120
<v Speaker 1>think would really be powerful here. It is US asylum

0:43:40.200 --> 0:43:44.600
<v Speaker 1>screeners to take a more confrontational approach. Internal document show

0:43:44.680 --> 0:43:49.160
<v Speaker 1>as Trump aims to turn away more migrants. Oh, because

0:43:49.160 --> 0:43:51.920
<v Speaker 1>Trump is such a big meaning they want you to know.

0:43:52.000 --> 0:43:55.160
<v Speaker 1>He's so mean. That's why he's doing this. Meanwhile, he's

0:43:55.160 --> 0:43:59.360
<v Speaker 1>trying to re establish any kind of security at the border.

0:44:00.680 --> 0:44:03.160
<v Speaker 1>It's the Washington Post. The Trump administration has sent new

0:44:03.160 --> 0:44:06.560
<v Speaker 1>guidelines to asylum officers, directing them to take a more

0:44:06.680 --> 0:44:10.600
<v Speaker 1>skeptical and confrontational approach during interviews with migrants seeking refuge

0:44:10.600 --> 0:44:13.200
<v Speaker 1>in the United States. It is the latest measure and

0:44:13.280 --> 0:44:17.560
<v Speaker 1>that tightening the nation's legal quote loopholes homeland security officials

0:44:17.560 --> 0:44:20.680
<v Speaker 1>blame for a spike in border crossings. According to internal

0:44:20.719 --> 0:44:23.640
<v Speaker 1>documents and staff emails obtained Tuesday by The Washington Post,

0:44:23.920 --> 0:44:27.800
<v Speaker 1>the asylum officers will more aggressively challenge applicants whose claims

0:44:27.800 --> 0:44:31.320
<v Speaker 1>of persecution contained discrepancies, and they'll need to provide detailed

0:44:31.320 --> 0:44:34.719
<v Speaker 1>justifications before concluding an applicant has a well founded fear.

0:44:34.800 --> 0:44:38.480
<v Speaker 1>That's right, credible fear. Folks might have to actually be

0:44:38.760 --> 0:44:42.840
<v Speaker 1>credible fear. Oh wow, you mean it will no longer

0:44:42.880 --> 0:44:45.680
<v Speaker 1>just be I am scared in my country of the

0:44:45.800 --> 0:44:49.560
<v Speaker 1>people coming for me, Like they're robotically reading this crap

0:44:50.120 --> 0:44:55.080
<v Speaker 1>that is handed to them by the different pro migrant

0:44:55.080 --> 0:44:57.880
<v Speaker 1>groups that are involved in all this, by the coyotes,

0:44:57.920 --> 0:45:00.960
<v Speaker 1>by the smugglers. They're told what to say. We know

0:45:01.080 --> 0:45:05.799
<v Speaker 1>they're economic migrants. We know they're not fleeing political or

0:45:05.800 --> 0:45:10.360
<v Speaker 1>religious or ethnic persecution. They're not asylum seekers. They're liars,

0:45:10.880 --> 0:45:13.879
<v Speaker 1>Not all of them, but ninety percent plus of them

0:45:14.280 --> 0:45:16.600
<v Speaker 1>who are saying they have a credible fear are lying

0:45:16.680 --> 0:45:20.919
<v Speaker 1>about it. Okay, let's just be honest about this. Just

0:45:21.080 --> 0:45:23.719
<v Speaker 1>living in Honduras does not mean you have a credible

0:45:23.760 --> 0:45:27.840
<v Speaker 1>fear of persecution. Just being from the country of asabad

0:45:27.960 --> 0:45:31.359
<v Speaker 1>or does not make you an asylum seeker. And if

0:45:31.360 --> 0:45:33.800
<v Speaker 1>it does, we need to be opening up our doors

0:45:33.840 --> 0:45:36.759
<v Speaker 1>to those entire countries, which we're getting pretty close to

0:45:36.800 --> 0:45:41.400
<v Speaker 1>doing these days. It feels like Trump administration's right tighten

0:45:41.480 --> 0:45:45.480
<v Speaker 1>things up, enforce the rules, make it harder secure the border.

0:45:46.800 --> 0:45:49.479
<v Speaker 1>They're moving to the right direction. Might be too little,

0:45:49.480 --> 0:45:54.799
<v Speaker 1>too late in terms of owning the center ground. I

0:45:54.920 --> 0:45:58.080
<v Speaker 1>think the center ground can be owned by the left,

0:45:58.440 --> 0:46:03.680
<v Speaker 1>whether it's raising the minimum way age, securing social security, medicare, medicaid,

0:46:04.000 --> 0:46:07.240
<v Speaker 1>redefine what the center is and don't let them define

0:46:07.760 --> 0:46:10.960
<v Speaker 1>our in a Canada as something of that is far left.

0:46:11.800 --> 0:46:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Trump is coding us to impeach him. That's what he's doing.

0:46:18.000 --> 0:46:21.760
<v Speaker 1>It's so perfect. I mean, we pull those two little

0:46:21.760 --> 0:46:23.719
<v Speaker 1>sound bites you together. On the one hand, you have

0:46:23.800 --> 0:46:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Nancy Pelosi. You know, the left is really the party

0:46:27.200 --> 0:46:30.200
<v Speaker 1>of the center. You know, Democrats, the progressives. We can

0:46:30.239 --> 0:46:33.600
<v Speaker 1>own the center. But I mean Trump is just begging

0:46:33.680 --> 0:46:36.000
<v Speaker 1>us to impeach him. Am I right? Am I right?

0:46:37.160 --> 0:46:40.759
<v Speaker 1>She's amazing, folks, She's amazed that just say whatever she

0:46:40.800 --> 0:46:44.680
<v Speaker 1>has to say, no no ethical, moral, or ideological core,

0:46:45.000 --> 0:46:47.279
<v Speaker 1>just whatever she needs to say whenever she needs to

0:46:47.320 --> 0:46:51.920
<v Speaker 1>say it. Moral, relativism, statis, m big government. These these

0:46:51.920 --> 0:46:55.960
<v Speaker 1>are the closest things that she has to organizing principles

0:46:55.960 --> 0:46:58.839
<v Speaker 1>for her ideology. And atop all that, of course is

0:46:59.200 --> 0:47:03.239
<v Speaker 1>the the glory of Nancy Pelosi. But whatever she has

0:47:03.239 --> 0:47:07.360
<v Speaker 1>to do to maintain her privileged position in society. Very wealthy,

0:47:07.520 --> 0:47:11.200
<v Speaker 1>very powerful, very connected. But I love us, you know, yeah, Democrats,

0:47:11.239 --> 0:47:15.359
<v Speaker 1>we're totally reasonable. Trump is begging us to impeach him.

0:47:15.360 --> 0:47:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Though I'm pretty sure, I'm pretty sure that Trump is

0:47:18.840 --> 0:47:22.319
<v Speaker 1>not goading them to impeach him. I'm pretty sure that

0:47:22.360 --> 0:47:27.319
<v Speaker 1>they have decided to embrace a trumped arrangement syndrome that

0:47:28.200 --> 0:47:32.000
<v Speaker 1>does feel and does does appear to be truly pathological.

0:47:32.160 --> 0:47:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of pathological, there is a a kind of multiple

0:47:36.640 --> 0:47:41.759
<v Speaker 1>personality disorder that is on display with Democrats over the

0:47:41.760 --> 0:47:45.840
<v Speaker 1>issue of impeachment. Depending on the day, you have Democrats

0:47:45.880 --> 0:47:48.960
<v Speaker 1>who say, well, we have to impeach him, and then

0:47:49.000 --> 0:47:51.520
<v Speaker 1>you have Democrats who say we're waiting for the evidence.

0:47:51.560 --> 0:47:53.239
<v Speaker 1>And then you have others who say we'll have to

0:47:54.560 --> 0:47:56.759
<v Speaker 1>give up on impeachment because it's going to blow back

0:47:56.800 --> 0:48:02.080
<v Speaker 1>on us. The political ramifications are not worth it. I

0:48:02.400 --> 0:48:04.759
<v Speaker 1>just wish, you know, they would get on the same

0:48:04.760 --> 0:48:10.200
<v Speaker 1>sheet of music for a few days instead of all here.

0:48:10.280 --> 0:48:12.239
<v Speaker 1>You know, people say buck, but they're politicians. They have

0:48:12.239 --> 0:48:15.919
<v Speaker 1>different opinions. No, no, no. The whole point is that

0:48:16.160 --> 0:48:19.279
<v Speaker 1>they're speaking with many mouths about this issue because it's

0:48:19.880 --> 0:48:24.879
<v Speaker 1>just bizarre, it's absurd. So they want to have some

0:48:24.920 --> 0:48:27.440
<v Speaker 1>people saying, oh, no, we're going to impeach them. So

0:48:27.440 --> 0:48:30.239
<v Speaker 1>that makes the left wing base happy. They want some

0:48:30.320 --> 0:48:32.759
<v Speaker 1>people who are saying, oh, we're gonna wait and see

0:48:32.760 --> 0:48:35.560
<v Speaker 1>who the evidence is. That's where the Trump deranged but

0:48:35.680 --> 0:48:39.040
<v Speaker 1>not completely insane. They are more comfortable with that. And

0:48:39.080 --> 0:48:41.640
<v Speaker 1>then the hold on a second, you know, maybe we

0:48:41.680 --> 0:48:45.360
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't go completely all in on this idea of impeachment

0:48:45.680 --> 0:48:48.320
<v Speaker 1>because it's going to blow back on us politically. That's

0:48:48.400 --> 0:48:53.680
<v Speaker 1>for the Democrat establishment that realizes if Muller couldn't deliver

0:48:53.760 --> 0:48:56.680
<v Speaker 1>them the big win that they wanted, they're no way,

0:48:57.360 --> 0:49:01.680
<v Speaker 1>no way, impeachment is going to do that for them.

0:49:02.239 --> 0:49:10.560
<v Speaker 1>They keep striving, struggling, begging, scratching, clawing for some one thing.

0:49:11.280 --> 0:49:15.840
<v Speaker 1>You know that that one coop de gross or is

0:49:15.840 --> 0:49:18.879
<v Speaker 1>it a coop de grosse? I think it's cool that

0:49:18.880 --> 0:49:25.840
<v Speaker 1>that one master stroke, that one moment of aha, where

0:49:25.920 --> 0:49:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Trump's presidency is finished and it's just not gonna happen.

0:49:30.280 --> 0:49:33.160
<v Speaker 1>And I have to wonder when they when they will

0:49:33.400 --> 0:49:35.680
<v Speaker 1>realize it's not gonna happen. I guess it'll be when

0:49:35.719 --> 0:49:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Trump wins reelection, then then there'll be some at least

0:49:42.640 --> 0:49:45.840
<v Speaker 1>a few hours of oh wow, this is real again.

0:49:46.520 --> 0:49:48.799
<v Speaker 1>But all the impeachment issue. But do we do? We

0:49:48.840 --> 0:49:52.960
<v Speaker 1>have Elizabeth war Elizabeth Warren, she was really annoying me today.

0:49:53.000 --> 0:49:55.120
<v Speaker 1>We gotta get someone, you know, Elizabeth Warren has been

0:49:55.120 --> 0:49:59.840
<v Speaker 1>saying annoying things about this. Beto O'Rourke is running around

0:50:00.280 --> 0:50:03.759
<v Speaker 1>desperate to try and get some attention for himself because look,

0:50:03.800 --> 0:50:07.759
<v Speaker 1>apparently my home videos and my rolled up sleeves and

0:50:07.960 --> 0:50:12.080
<v Speaker 1>my sort of rugged Kennedy Usk handsomeness is not enough

0:50:12.120 --> 0:50:16.279
<v Speaker 1>to make me president. Uh. He says that we are

0:50:16.320 --> 0:50:20.759
<v Speaker 1>at the must impeach Trump phase. We must do this

0:50:21.400 --> 0:50:27.279
<v Speaker 1>play clip twelve to invite power to participate in our elections,

0:50:27.960 --> 0:50:33.560
<v Speaker 1>to obstructs justice and cover up during the investigation. There

0:50:35.160 --> 0:50:38.359
<v Speaker 1>there must be accountability. We must get behind the House

0:50:38.480 --> 0:50:45.520
<v Speaker 1>of Representatives and they pursuing peach, must pursue impeach of

0:50:45.560 --> 0:50:47.799
<v Speaker 1>this president. Does Betto ever have to explain? What's this?

0:50:47.840 --> 0:50:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Trump invited a foreign power to participate in our election?

0:50:51.480 --> 0:50:55.359
<v Speaker 1>I don't remember that, Betto? Is that because he made

0:50:55.360 --> 0:50:57.800
<v Speaker 1>a joke about Russia. If you have the Hillary emails,

0:50:57.880 --> 0:51:00.520
<v Speaker 1>let us know, keep in mind, they're all hoping that

0:51:00.560 --> 0:51:02.799
<v Speaker 1>nobody will do the due diligence and the research to

0:51:02.840 --> 0:51:05.400
<v Speaker 1>separate these things out. Russia never did have the Hillary emails.

0:51:06.600 --> 0:51:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Russia hacked into the DNC servers and John Podesta's emails

0:51:12.040 --> 0:51:14.319
<v Speaker 1>and release some of those through wiki leagues, but they

0:51:14.360 --> 0:51:17.759
<v Speaker 1>never got Hillary's emails. The people who say that, oh,

0:51:17.840 --> 0:51:20.439
<v Speaker 1>but they were acting on Trump's orders, No, they weren't.

0:51:20.440 --> 0:51:22.319
<v Speaker 1>And these were rumors that were flying around all over

0:51:22.360 --> 0:51:26.120
<v Speaker 1>the place. Invited a foreign power to participate at our election.

0:51:26.239 --> 0:51:29.759
<v Speaker 1>Oh my gosh, these people really, I would say they

0:51:29.800 --> 0:51:31.640
<v Speaker 1>need to get out more. But bettos out all the time.

0:51:31.640 --> 0:51:34.399
<v Speaker 1>He's running around doing this kind of on the road

0:51:34.560 --> 0:51:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Jack Kerouac thing where he's just traveling all over the

0:51:37.040 --> 0:51:40.040
<v Speaker 1>place and trying to get attention for himself. You know,

0:51:40.120 --> 0:51:41.960
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you, I knew Betto wasn't going to be

0:51:41.960 --> 0:51:46.239
<v Speaker 1>the guy. Although I for a moment thought that the

0:51:46.320 --> 0:51:48.880
<v Speaker 1>Democrats were so in love with him and so delusional

0:51:48.920 --> 0:51:53.120
<v Speaker 1>that nothing could nothing could dissuade them. There was a

0:51:53.200 --> 0:51:56.520
<v Speaker 1>moment in time where because everything about him was defying

0:51:56.719 --> 0:52:00.880
<v Speaker 1>gravity and reality. But when he did that that totally

0:52:00.960 --> 0:52:05.560
<v Speaker 1>dumbass video of himself getting his teeth cleaned. He's like her,

0:52:06.480 --> 0:52:08.520
<v Speaker 1>are you know he's in the dentist chair of the

0:52:08.520 --> 0:52:12.920
<v Speaker 1>whole thing? And get who is this guy? Why? Why

0:52:12.960 --> 0:52:15.399
<v Speaker 1>would anyone think this is a good idea? And how

0:52:15.440 --> 0:52:18.600
<v Speaker 1>could anyone expect us to want to give them the

0:52:18.719 --> 0:52:21.920
<v Speaker 1>nuclear codes when this is their version of a judgment?

0:52:21.960 --> 0:52:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Call Representative Al Green, I would not. It is also

0:52:26.920 --> 0:52:30.160
<v Speaker 1>in the impeach, impeach, impeach side of things. Play thirteen.

0:52:31.040 --> 0:52:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Are you concerned that impeachment talk may actually help the

0:52:34.000 --> 0:52:37.920
<v Speaker 1>president's reelection? I'm concerned that if we don't impeach this president,

0:52:38.200 --> 0:52:43.239
<v Speaker 1>he will get reelected, so he takes You know, democrats

0:52:44.040 --> 0:52:46.000
<v Speaker 1>can't can't seem to figure it out. Is it that

0:52:46.000 --> 0:52:49.719
<v Speaker 1>if they impeach him he will get reelected, he won't

0:52:49.719 --> 0:52:51.319
<v Speaker 1>get You know, there's they have no idea. This is

0:52:51.320 --> 0:52:54.040
<v Speaker 1>all It's all just political. It's all nonsense. This is

0:52:54.080 --> 0:52:57.319
<v Speaker 1>their obsession. They want to keep talking about this. They're

0:52:57.440 --> 0:53:01.000
<v Speaker 1>desperate to make it seem like there's more at work

0:53:01.040 --> 0:53:07.279
<v Speaker 1>here than the most obvious partisan nonsense. You know that

0:53:07.320 --> 0:53:11.480
<v Speaker 1>this is about the defending our democracy and about protecting

0:53:11.480 --> 0:53:17.120
<v Speaker 1>our core institutions. And come on, no no serious person

0:53:17.200 --> 0:53:22.279
<v Speaker 1>believes this. Nobody really thinks this is the case. But

0:53:22.440 --> 0:53:26.959
<v Speaker 1>I guess some Democrats are wacko enough that they're they're

0:53:27.000 --> 0:53:29.000
<v Speaker 1>on this one man. They're they're deciding that this is

0:53:29.000 --> 0:53:31.560
<v Speaker 1>what they're gonna this is what they're gonna do. And

0:53:31.640 --> 0:53:36.279
<v Speaker 1>then they got Joe Biden out there. They got Joe

0:53:36.280 --> 0:53:40.359
<v Speaker 1>Biden leading the charge right now. I just I know

0:53:40.400 --> 0:53:43.320
<v Speaker 1>I've been saying it, but I don't see it. I

0:53:43.360 --> 0:53:45.879
<v Speaker 1>don't think Uncle Joe's got the goods. I don't think

0:53:45.880 --> 0:53:47.640
<v Speaker 1>he had him then. I don't think he has him now.

0:53:47.680 --> 0:53:51.320
<v Speaker 1>I think he's a guy who has gotten very lucky

0:53:51.680 --> 0:53:54.160
<v Speaker 1>in his political career, got him in the right place

0:53:54.200 --> 0:53:58.880
<v Speaker 1>at the right time, and his clinging to the legacy

0:53:58.920 --> 0:54:02.400
<v Speaker 1>of Barack Obama's gonna get old. People are gonna realize

0:54:02.440 --> 0:54:06.480
<v Speaker 1>that this isn't this isn't enough. Talking about his buddy

0:54:06.520 --> 0:54:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Baroque is not gonna sell people on why he should

0:54:09.480 --> 0:54:12.680
<v Speaker 1>be the next leader of the free world. Play clip four.

0:54:14.600 --> 0:54:17.400
<v Speaker 1>I watch my buddy Brock stand out there, watch the

0:54:17.640 --> 0:54:20.520
<v Speaker 1>r and he talked about we have to find that

0:54:20.719 --> 0:54:25.279
<v Speaker 1>amazing grace. By the way, there is amazing grace in

0:54:25.360 --> 0:54:27.919
<v Speaker 1>this country. We just have to reach out and pull

0:54:27.960 --> 0:54:37.440
<v Speaker 1>it in, folks, where you must defeat Donald Trump above

0:54:37.480 --> 0:54:39.759
<v Speaker 1>all else. He says, we gotta defeat Donald Trump. That's

0:54:39.760 --> 0:54:42.839
<v Speaker 1>gonna be his pitch. He's gonna say he's electable. Now,

0:54:42.880 --> 0:54:45.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm just putting this out there for the Democrats who

0:54:45.000 --> 0:54:48.080
<v Speaker 1>are listening in the audience. What was the Hillary Clinton

0:54:48.120 --> 0:54:52.600
<v Speaker 1>pitch again? Oh, that's right, that above all else. If

0:54:52.600 --> 0:54:55.919
<v Speaker 1>you wanted to beat Hell, if you wanted to beat

0:54:55.920 --> 0:54:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton was your choice. How did that

0:54:59.640 --> 0:55:04.960
<v Speaker 1>work out? Exactly? How did the super establishment insider, boring,

0:55:05.640 --> 0:55:09.240
<v Speaker 1>uninspiring Democrat candidate to defeat Donald Trump in twenty sixteen?

0:55:09.280 --> 0:55:10.920
<v Speaker 1>How that go? Oh? That's right. They had to cook

0:55:11.000 --> 0:55:14.160
<v Speaker 1>up a whole crazy person story about Russia collusion to

0:55:14.239 --> 0:55:18.600
<v Speaker 1>explain the loss. I'm telling you, China collusion twenty twenty.

0:55:18.640 --> 0:55:22.960
<v Speaker 1>When Biden loses, it could happen. You know, people say, well, Joe,

0:55:23.000 --> 0:55:25.399
<v Speaker 1>how are you gonna do all this? Well, guess what

0:55:25.840 --> 0:55:27.720
<v Speaker 1>first thing I do is going to repeal this Trump

0:55:27.760 --> 0:55:34.520
<v Speaker 1>tax cut. Oh, not a joke, Not a joke. Biden's like,

0:55:35.200 --> 0:55:37.360
<v Speaker 1>you know what, everybody don't. I don't think you should

0:55:37.360 --> 0:55:39.440
<v Speaker 1>like this great economy. I don't think you should be

0:55:39.480 --> 0:55:42.400
<v Speaker 1>excited about what's going on in America right now. I

0:55:42.880 --> 0:55:46.799
<v Speaker 1>think we need people making less money, we need higher unemployment,

0:55:47.160 --> 0:55:50.400
<v Speaker 1>we need things to stop going so well. Joe Biden

0:55:50.480 --> 0:55:53.080
<v Speaker 1>blue color, Joe sharing you his wisdom for the day.

0:55:54.360 --> 0:55:59.360
<v Speaker 1>Oh man. The Democrats, Yeah, I'm not the I'm not

0:55:59.480 --> 0:56:01.759
<v Speaker 1>a lone voice in the woods anymore with Democrats who

0:56:01.760 --> 0:56:05.520
<v Speaker 1>are realizing this guy's got weaknesses. Folks, this is not

0:56:05.960 --> 0:56:08.400
<v Speaker 1>it's not gonna be enough to be Trump. When you

0:56:08.520 --> 0:56:12.640
<v Speaker 1>line up Biden and Hillary, you know, Hillary had the

0:56:12.680 --> 0:56:17.360
<v Speaker 1>whole woman thing going for her, had a you could argue,

0:56:17.480 --> 0:56:20.839
<v Speaker 1>certainly a more distinguished track record. I don't know if

0:56:21.080 --> 0:56:24.399
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't say successful, but you know, with her whole

0:56:24.440 --> 0:56:27.640
<v Speaker 1>secretary of state run me. Look, they're they're comparable. I mean,

0:56:27.680 --> 0:56:31.000
<v Speaker 1>the resumes are comparable. They're both creatures of public life

0:56:31.000 --> 0:56:33.240
<v Speaker 1>with their whole lives. But Hillary had the whole glass

0:56:33.239 --> 0:56:36.560
<v Speaker 1>ceiling thing and the Clinton establishment around her, and I

0:56:37.200 --> 0:56:39.000
<v Speaker 1>think that you could make a case that she was

0:56:39.040 --> 0:56:44.640
<v Speaker 1>a she was a stronger establishment candidate against Trump than

0:56:44.719 --> 0:56:48.160
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden would be. And Democrats are starting to figure

0:56:48.200 --> 0:56:50.000
<v Speaker 1>that out. And that's why when they're saying things like,

0:56:50.040 --> 0:56:52.480
<v Speaker 1>the first thing I'm gonna do is repeal those tax cuts.

0:56:53.400 --> 0:56:55.880
<v Speaker 1>Why are people cheering for that? They really want to

0:56:55.920 --> 0:56:57.959
<v Speaker 1>give more of their money to the government. Who who

0:56:58.000 --> 0:57:02.800
<v Speaker 1>wants to do that? Ever? Come across people who really

0:57:02.840 --> 0:57:07.160
<v Speaker 1>think that that's a good idea in real life, but conceptually,

0:57:07.200 --> 0:57:10.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, theoretically that other people would be paying more

0:57:10.600 --> 0:57:13.759
<v Speaker 1>in taxes as somehow exciting to them. That just that

0:57:13.880 --> 0:57:19.680
<v Speaker 1>strikes me as very very odd mentality that Democrats have.

0:57:19.760 --> 0:57:24.920
<v Speaker 1>But it's worse than just bad ideas that they're repackaging.

0:57:25.400 --> 0:57:27.640
<v Speaker 1>The Democrats will never give up on. You know, higher

0:57:27.680 --> 0:57:30.160
<v Speaker 1>taxes is better, Well, it turns out it's not better

0:57:30.200 --> 0:57:31.840
<v Speaker 1>for you as an individual, and it's not better for

0:57:31.880 --> 0:57:35.600
<v Speaker 1>economic growth, so it's not better. Overall, government is incredibly wasteful.

0:57:35.680 --> 0:57:38.240
<v Speaker 1>Government should not be taking more money than is absolutely

0:57:38.320 --> 0:57:44.440
<v Speaker 1>necessary to run. It's very limited and constitutionally secured mandates

0:57:44.520 --> 0:57:46.840
<v Speaker 1>like national defense, and you know, there's only a few

0:57:46.840 --> 0:57:49.320
<v Speaker 1>things that government should really be doing, but we do

0:57:49.360 --> 0:57:54.040
<v Speaker 1>a whole lot more now. But what concerns me is

0:57:54.120 --> 0:57:58.440
<v Speaker 1>that you have Joe Biden getting all this establishment attention,

0:57:59.160 --> 0:58:03.800
<v Speaker 1>and then on the other side you have these quite

0:58:04.120 --> 0:58:08.920
<v Speaker 1>these establishment candidates that don't really seem to get the

0:58:09.000 --> 0:58:12.240
<v Speaker 1>same degree of support from the DNC, And you know,

0:58:12.320 --> 0:58:14.560
<v Speaker 1>the media likes them, but they haven't yet fallen in

0:58:14.560 --> 0:58:18.240
<v Speaker 1>love with them, and they're moving further and further left

0:58:18.360 --> 0:58:22.080
<v Speaker 1>with ideas that aren't just you know, raising my taxes

0:58:22.280 --> 0:58:25.840
<v Speaker 1>is annoying. Raising my taxes is something that the Democrats

0:58:25.840 --> 0:58:27.959
<v Speaker 1>want to do that would bother me and should bother

0:58:28.040 --> 0:58:31.160
<v Speaker 1>you too. They're if you pay taxes more or less.

0:58:31.200 --> 0:58:33.919
<v Speaker 1>There's some exceptions to this. You got a tax cut.

0:58:34.960 --> 0:58:38.000
<v Speaker 1>So if you're a taxpayer, it is there's an eighty

0:58:38.000 --> 0:58:40.240
<v Speaker 1>percent chance that you got a tax cut because of Trump.

0:58:40.400 --> 0:58:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Democrats want to take that away. But I can handle that.

0:58:43.480 --> 0:58:46.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't approve of it. I think it's a bad idea,

0:58:46.840 --> 0:58:50.440
<v Speaker 1>but it doesn't really put me on edge. Some of

0:58:50.440 --> 0:58:52.800
<v Speaker 1>the other things you're hearing from these left wing candidates

0:58:52.960 --> 0:58:55.960
<v Speaker 1>or these candidates that are trying to appear more left wing,

0:58:56.000 --> 0:58:58.480
<v Speaker 1>that's really what's going on. Appear more left wing so

0:58:58.560 --> 0:59:01.880
<v Speaker 1>they can appeal to the progressive base that they need

0:59:01.920 --> 0:59:04.720
<v Speaker 1>in order to gain enough numbers and enough support to

0:59:04.760 --> 0:59:07.000
<v Speaker 1>come out of this primary. People like Corey Booker or

0:59:07.040 --> 0:59:12.640
<v Speaker 1>like Kamala Harris, Elizabeth Warren Corey Booker on guns is

0:59:13.640 --> 0:59:20.720
<v Speaker 1>concerning to me. There's an authoritarian statism that is at

0:59:20.720 --> 0:59:25.520
<v Speaker 1>the heart of his appeal on guns. This is CNN

0:59:25.600 --> 0:59:28.800
<v Speaker 1>asking Corey Booker about what the consequences would be for

0:59:30.000 --> 0:59:33.280
<v Speaker 1>They always say a buyback program. Remember, a buy back

0:59:33.360 --> 0:59:37.560
<v Speaker 1>program when it comes to guns, is mandatory confiscation with

0:59:38.640 --> 0:59:41.280
<v Speaker 1>whatever fee they decide to give you, which you know,

0:59:41.320 --> 0:59:42.640
<v Speaker 1>for in a lot of cases, is not going to

0:59:42.680 --> 0:59:44.200
<v Speaker 1>be the fair market value of the guns. So it's

0:59:44.200 --> 0:59:49.000
<v Speaker 1>really a confiscation with some you know, minimal compensation. Oh

0:59:49.040 --> 0:59:51.160
<v Speaker 1>and by the way, if you just don't want to

0:59:51.160 --> 0:59:54.440
<v Speaker 1>go along with this, they'll throw you in prison. Corey

0:59:54.440 --> 0:59:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Booker was asked about this. Here's what he said in

0:59:56.800 --> 0:59:59.240
<v Speaker 1>play too. The critical thing is, I think most Americans

0:59:59.480 --> 1:00:04.000
<v Speaker 1>agree that these weapons of war should not be on

1:00:04.000 --> 1:00:07.720
<v Speaker 1>our streets. Again, would you prosecute people do support the

1:00:07.760 --> 1:00:10.320
<v Speaker 1>government buying them back? And if not, potentially people could

1:00:10.360 --> 1:00:12.080
<v Speaker 1>go to jail if they don't want to sell them back.

1:00:12.160 --> 1:00:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Yes or no. Again, we should have a law that

1:00:15.240 --> 1:00:18.400
<v Speaker 1>bans these weapons, and we should have a reasonable period

1:00:18.400 --> 1:00:21.919
<v Speaker 1>in which people can turn in these weapons. Right now,

1:00:22.000 --> 1:00:25.280
<v Speaker 1>we have a nation that allows in streets and communities

1:00:25.320 --> 1:00:29.600
<v Speaker 1>like mine. These weapons that should not exist. Okay, let's

1:00:30.040 --> 1:00:32.880
<v Speaker 1>unpack their what he says, because it's quite clear to

1:00:32.920 --> 1:00:35.200
<v Speaker 1>me that the answer is that he's giving is Oh, yeah, no,

1:00:35.200 --> 1:00:38.920
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna lock people up for they're lawfully purchased and

1:00:39.040 --> 1:00:41.600
<v Speaker 1>currently possessed firearms. We're gonna lock people up for that.

1:00:42.440 --> 1:00:45.520
<v Speaker 1>He says. There should be a reasonable period in which

1:00:45.560 --> 1:00:47.920
<v Speaker 1>they can turn in these weapons. Okay, what if they

1:00:47.960 --> 1:00:50.320
<v Speaker 1>don't turn them in. But if they don't want to

1:00:50.320 --> 1:00:52.240
<v Speaker 1>turn them in, what if this is their private property

1:00:52.240 --> 1:00:55.680
<v Speaker 1>that they lawfully obtained and that the Second Amendment guarantees

1:00:55.720 --> 1:00:58.600
<v Speaker 1>their right to continue to own. They are weapons in

1:00:58.640 --> 1:01:02.160
<v Speaker 1>common usage, so they are covered under d C. V. Heller.

1:01:04.000 --> 1:01:07.040
<v Speaker 1>What happens to those people? You pass this law, you

1:01:07.120 --> 1:01:08.880
<v Speaker 1>give the time period, what if they don't do it?

1:01:09.640 --> 1:01:13.080
<v Speaker 1>A law without a penalty rapidly ceases to be a

1:01:13.200 --> 1:01:16.960
<v Speaker 1>law at all. Corey Booker knows this, and that's why

1:01:17.080 --> 1:01:19.880
<v Speaker 1>Corey Booker wants you to know. Although he won't come

1:01:19.920 --> 1:01:23.760
<v Speaker 1>out and say it that he would be comfortable, Oh,

1:01:23.800 --> 1:01:27.440
<v Speaker 1>that's right, separating families, because that's what happens when you

1:01:27.840 --> 1:01:30.680
<v Speaker 1>lock somebody up because they have a semi automatic rifle

1:01:30.720 --> 1:01:33.800
<v Speaker 1>that they are legally allowed to own until Corey Booker

1:01:33.920 --> 1:01:36.760
<v Speaker 1>and the Progressive Democrats come along and pass some sort

1:01:36.800 --> 1:01:40.200
<v Speaker 1>of assault rifle ban. All the data shows that the

1:01:40.600 --> 1:01:45.040
<v Speaker 1>assault rifle ban was effectively irrelevant, did nothing in terms

1:01:45.040 --> 1:01:49.440
<v Speaker 1>of dropping violent crime, was annoying to people though, and

1:01:49.640 --> 1:01:52.880
<v Speaker 1>was an infringement on their Second Amendment rights. This phrase,

1:01:52.920 --> 1:01:56.040
<v Speaker 1>they use weapons of war is such an idiotic phrase.

1:01:57.120 --> 1:02:00.440
<v Speaker 1>A weapon of war. I mean, you think about some

1:02:00.640 --> 1:02:02.880
<v Speaker 1>of the weapons that are in common usage. You say, well,

1:02:02.920 --> 1:02:06.840
<v Speaker 1>of course they're used in warfare, And ultimately that is

1:02:06.960 --> 1:02:09.160
<v Speaker 1>the point. The point is, and this is where liberals

1:02:09.160 --> 1:02:12.960
<v Speaker 1>get really uncomfortable. If we needed to wage an insurrection

1:02:13.040 --> 1:02:15.920
<v Speaker 1>against a tyrannical government, we would be in a position

1:02:16.040 --> 1:02:19.960
<v Speaker 1>to do so. So that's why, Yeah, we don't want muskets.

1:02:20.240 --> 1:02:23.160
<v Speaker 1>We want semi automatic rifles, we want handguns. We want

1:02:23.200 --> 1:02:27.480
<v Speaker 1>things that would be useful in the context of a

1:02:27.560 --> 1:02:30.280
<v Speaker 1>defense against tyranny as well as self defense and defense

1:02:30.320 --> 1:02:34.360
<v Speaker 1>at ones home and property. Put weapons of war. They

1:02:34.360 --> 1:02:37.480
<v Speaker 1>make it sound like they're talking about Stinger missiles. They're

1:02:37.480 --> 1:02:40.800
<v Speaker 1>talking about semi automatic rifles that have a folding stock.

1:02:41.520 --> 1:02:43.520
<v Speaker 1>But ultimately, Corey Booker is willing to throw you in

1:02:43.520 --> 1:02:44.920
<v Speaker 1>prison if you don't do what he wants on us.

1:02:44.960 --> 1:02:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Just remember that Democrats are all about smiles and the

1:02:47.400 --> 1:02:49.240
<v Speaker 1>little guy and the poor guy and all that nice

1:02:49.240 --> 1:02:52.200
<v Speaker 1>stuff until it comes to guns. They think guns are

1:02:52.200 --> 1:02:54.480
<v Speaker 1>ikey and gun owners should go to prison. They're okay

1:02:54.520 --> 1:03:01.920
<v Speaker 1>with that. For many years, Trees have been taking total

1:03:01.960 --> 1:03:07.080
<v Speaker 1>advantage of the United States on trade, whether they're allies

1:03:07.200 --> 1:03:10.760
<v Speaker 1>or not. They looked at us really as a bunch

1:03:10.760 --> 1:03:15.560
<v Speaker 1>of very soft touches. And that's not what's happening anymore.

1:03:15.760 --> 1:03:19.880
<v Speaker 1>We've placed massive tariffs on China, and the tariffs have

1:03:20.040 --> 1:03:23.400
<v Speaker 1>really had a positive impact. Number One, our country has

1:03:23.440 --> 1:03:26.400
<v Speaker 1>taken in a lot of money. Number Two, we're creating

1:03:26.480 --> 1:03:29.960
<v Speaker 1>jobs like never before. So it's very important that China

1:03:30.040 --> 1:03:33.560
<v Speaker 1>open its markets to our farmers and everybody else because

1:03:33.640 --> 1:03:37.960
<v Speaker 1>right now they're clothes largely, and yet our markets are

1:03:38.480 --> 1:03:42.240
<v Speaker 1>open to them. We're changing things, and we're changing them fast.

1:03:44.440 --> 1:03:46.920
<v Speaker 1>How fast are we changing things and how are we

1:03:46.960 --> 1:03:49.960
<v Speaker 1>doing in this trade negotiation with China. It's supposed to

1:03:49.960 --> 1:03:51.720
<v Speaker 1>be a big deadline on Friday. We've got our friend

1:03:51.720 --> 1:03:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Gordon Chang back in the house. Everybody he is the

1:03:53.840 --> 1:03:58.120
<v Speaker 1>author of the Coming Collapse of China. You can also

1:03:58.160 --> 1:04:01.560
<v Speaker 1>go to Gordon sea Chang dot com for his latest analysis,

1:04:01.640 --> 1:04:03.400
<v Speaker 1>and you see him a lot on Fox and pretty

1:04:03.480 --> 1:04:06.120
<v Speaker 1>much every news network out there. Gordon, great to have

1:04:06.160 --> 1:04:10.160
<v Speaker 1>you on, sir, Thank you so much. Buck. So, how

1:04:10.200 --> 1:04:12.480
<v Speaker 1>are things, How are things looking for this trade deadline

1:04:12.480 --> 1:04:15.440
<v Speaker 1>on Friday? How's the Trump administration handling all this? And

1:04:15.480 --> 1:04:18.760
<v Speaker 1>what do you think the Chinese? What are they thinking

1:04:18.840 --> 1:04:22.800
<v Speaker 1>right now about this whole trade deal? I think Beijing

1:04:22.920 --> 1:04:25.760
<v Speaker 1>is a bit in a panic because they're used to

1:04:25.800 --> 1:04:29.960
<v Speaker 1>getting their way with the American negotiators, but President Trump

1:04:29.960 --> 1:04:32.840
<v Speaker 1>has kept them off balance. I think the things look

1:04:32.880 --> 1:04:36.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot better for us after Trump's tweet on Sunday

1:04:36.200 --> 1:04:38.400
<v Speaker 1>where he said he was going to increase the tariffs,

1:04:39.240 --> 1:04:41.840
<v Speaker 1>and that's what we absolutely need to do because Beijing

1:04:41.920 --> 1:04:44.120
<v Speaker 1>right now is not talking to us in good faith

1:04:44.720 --> 1:04:49.200
<v Speaker 1>see jumping. The Chinese ruler withdrew commitments that his trade

1:04:49.200 --> 1:04:52.120
<v Speaker 1>negotiators made to the United States, and those commitments were

1:04:52.160 --> 1:04:55.600
<v Speaker 1>across the board. So right now I don't believe Beijing

1:04:55.720 --> 1:05:00.080
<v Speaker 1>is actually come to terms with the United States. What

1:05:00.160 --> 1:05:05.000
<v Speaker 1>should Trump do if, in fact, as we go into Friday,

1:05:05.040 --> 1:05:07.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's twenty five percent tariff on two hundred

1:05:07.680 --> 1:05:11.120
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars of good Do you think that's the move? Well,

1:05:11.240 --> 1:05:14.880
<v Speaker 1>that's the start. If it were President Chang, the tariffs

1:05:14.880 --> 1:05:17.280
<v Speaker 1>would not be twenty five percent, They'd be two hundred

1:05:17.320 --> 1:05:20.919
<v Speaker 1>and fifty percent or twenty five hundred percent. I would

1:05:21.000 --> 1:05:23.560
<v Speaker 1>ban the importation into the US of any goods that

1:05:23.600 --> 1:05:26.560
<v Speaker 1>have benefited from the theft of US intellectual property, and

1:05:26.640 --> 1:05:29.520
<v Speaker 1>I would ban the importation of goods sold by any

1:05:29.560 --> 1:05:34.160
<v Speaker 1>company that has stolen USIP. We need to be extremely

1:05:34.200 --> 1:05:37.480
<v Speaker 1>tough on them. But what Trump is doing is really

1:05:37.520 --> 1:05:41.720
<v Speaker 1>moves in the right direction, because at some point, you know,

1:05:41.880 --> 1:05:44.360
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese have to understand that they cannot use their

1:05:44.360 --> 1:05:48.640
<v Speaker 1>traditional tactics against US and expect continued success. How has

1:05:48.680 --> 1:05:52.280
<v Speaker 1>the shift in trade policy from the Trump administration affected

1:05:52.320 --> 1:05:56.120
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese? We always hear about the downside for our

1:05:56.160 --> 1:06:00.320
<v Speaker 1>own economy from the mainstream media, but it's been a

1:06:00.360 --> 1:06:02.440
<v Speaker 1>rough year in China For people who pay attention to

1:06:02.480 --> 1:06:05.400
<v Speaker 1>the markets. I think they've certainly been seeing that. So, Gordon,

1:06:05.720 --> 1:06:08.520
<v Speaker 1>how do you gauge all this? It has been a

1:06:08.600 --> 1:06:12.800
<v Speaker 1>rough year, and right after the President's on Sunday, you

1:06:12.920 --> 1:06:16.440
<v Speaker 1>saw the Shanghai composite drop five point six percent or so,

1:06:16.840 --> 1:06:22.040
<v Speaker 1>but more significantly the Shenshin composite down seven something and

1:06:22.200 --> 1:06:24.959
<v Speaker 1>the China X which is tech heavy, that was down

1:06:25.040 --> 1:06:29.360
<v Speaker 1>seven point nine percent one day. So China, actually, I think,

1:06:29.480 --> 1:06:33.720
<v Speaker 1>is not doing very well in general, but the trade

1:06:33.720 --> 1:06:37.880
<v Speaker 1>war hasn't helped it. But remember, China has structural problems

1:06:37.920 --> 1:06:41.240
<v Speaker 1>on its own, and what Trump's actions are doing is

1:06:41.240 --> 1:06:46.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of adding another level of insecurity to people in China,

1:06:46.680 --> 1:06:50.280
<v Speaker 1>and that's a good thing for US. China right now

1:06:50.400 --> 1:06:53.800
<v Speaker 1>is growing maybe one or two percent in reality, it's

1:06:53.880 --> 1:06:56.240
<v Speaker 1>not nearly the six point four percent that they claim

1:06:56.320 --> 1:06:58.800
<v Speaker 1>for the last quarter. And the most important thing buck

1:06:59.160 --> 1:07:02.200
<v Speaker 1>in order to get whatever growth they have, they're creating

1:07:02.360 --> 1:07:05.480
<v Speaker 1>five and a half times as much debt as nominal

1:07:05.520 --> 1:07:11.400
<v Speaker 1>gross domestic product, even if the inflated GDP claims are accurate.

1:07:12.320 --> 1:07:14.280
<v Speaker 1>That's up from one and a half times from a

1:07:14.360 --> 1:07:17.840
<v Speaker 1>year ago. That's really a sign of an economy in trouble.

1:07:19.280 --> 1:07:22.600
<v Speaker 1>What do you think the break Is there any realistic

1:07:22.640 --> 1:07:26.400
<v Speaker 1>possibility of a breakthrough where all parties come away, if

1:07:26.440 --> 1:07:30.760
<v Speaker 1>not happy, at least with the most constructive deal in

1:07:30.840 --> 1:07:33.360
<v Speaker 1>place possible I mean, all along Trump has been hoping

1:07:33.400 --> 1:07:35.720
<v Speaker 1>to get a deal with the Chinese? Is there any

1:07:36.440 --> 1:07:38.479
<v Speaker 1>they've been getting away with a lot for a long time?

1:07:38.600 --> 1:07:42.560
<v Speaker 1>Intellectual property theft, you mentioned predatory trade practices. A lot

1:07:42.600 --> 1:07:44.240
<v Speaker 1>of folks I know would argue they never should have

1:07:44.240 --> 1:07:47.480
<v Speaker 1>been allowed in the World Trade Organization period. But if

1:07:47.760 --> 1:07:51.000
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese finally succumbed to the pressure the Trump administration

1:07:51.000 --> 1:07:53.800
<v Speaker 1>has put on them to establish a more fair deal,

1:07:54.400 --> 1:07:57.880
<v Speaker 1>are is there a big upside for the Chinese economy

1:07:57.880 --> 1:07:59.960
<v Speaker 1>over the long run? I mean, you know, what is

1:08:00.120 --> 1:08:01.960
<v Speaker 1>the best case scenario out of all This is what

1:08:02.000 --> 1:08:05.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to get at. Okay, from my perspective, a

1:08:06.040 --> 1:08:09.440
<v Speaker 1>best case scenario is no trade deal and we disengage

1:08:09.440 --> 1:08:13.960
<v Speaker 1>from China, we get our faith there, and we go

1:08:14.040 --> 1:08:16.960
<v Speaker 1>our separate way. And the reason is that the Chinese

1:08:16.960 --> 1:08:19.479
<v Speaker 1>are not leaving us any choice. I mean, they steal

1:08:19.600 --> 1:08:22.240
<v Speaker 1>somewhere I would guess three to four hundred billion dollars

1:08:22.240 --> 1:08:25.840
<v Speaker 1>a year in USIP. If you disengage, you're giving them

1:08:25.880 --> 1:08:31.040
<v Speaker 1>fewer opportunities to take stuff. And also the more you disengage,

1:08:31.160 --> 1:08:34.480
<v Speaker 1>the fewer the opportunities they have to violate trade agreements

1:08:34.479 --> 1:08:38.479
<v Speaker 1>with US, But you know, anything is possible, Buck, there

1:08:38.479 --> 1:08:40.920
<v Speaker 1>could be an agreement. An agreement would be a great

1:08:40.920 --> 1:08:43.880
<v Speaker 1>thing for China because what they're lacking right now is

1:08:44.000 --> 1:08:46.880
<v Speaker 1>confidence in their own economy. And you're starting to see

1:08:47.600 --> 1:08:52.160
<v Speaker 1>a number of manufacturers move their operations out of China

1:08:52.200 --> 1:08:55.240
<v Speaker 1>because they're worried about geopolitical risk. They're also worried about

1:08:55.320 --> 1:08:58.599
<v Speaker 1>other things, but one of the factors is geopolitical risk,

1:08:58.960 --> 1:09:01.839
<v Speaker 1>and that is a trade agreement. You have a trade agreement,

1:09:02.080 --> 1:09:08.479
<v Speaker 1>you reduce those concerns. Trump administration is handling China the

1:09:08.520 --> 1:09:10.800
<v Speaker 1>way that you would like them too, for the most part, Gordon,

1:09:10.920 --> 1:09:15.000
<v Speaker 1>is that fair to say, Yeah, I think the administration

1:09:15.160 --> 1:09:17.960
<v Speaker 1>is moving in the right direction. I of course would

1:09:18.000 --> 1:09:22.959
<v Speaker 1>like to see it faster, but you know, American governments

1:09:22.960 --> 1:09:27.320
<v Speaker 1>don't move that fast. But we're seeing I think, a

1:09:27.360 --> 1:09:32.720
<v Speaker 1>political calculus across the spectrum of American politics that right

1:09:32.760 --> 1:09:37.320
<v Speaker 1>now understands the threat that China poses and is actually,

1:09:37.760 --> 1:09:39.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're moving in the right direction. So, for instance,

1:09:40.000 --> 1:09:43.920
<v Speaker 1>you had Chuck's humor talk about supporting the president's policies

1:09:44.120 --> 1:09:47.280
<v Speaker 1>on tariffs. That's a very good thing. We know, the

1:09:47.320 --> 1:09:51.679
<v Speaker 1>Speaker of the House doesn't like Beijing for very good reasons.

1:09:51.960 --> 1:09:55.800
<v Speaker 1>And so clearly Trump can put together a coalition here

1:09:56.280 --> 1:10:01.960
<v Speaker 1>because people understand the China challenge. How are we doing

1:10:02.000 --> 1:10:05.639
<v Speaker 1>switching gears for second to North Korea? There have been

1:10:05.760 --> 1:10:07.639
<v Speaker 1>some critics of the president who are saying, see, Kim

1:10:07.720 --> 1:10:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Jong un isn't doing what he said he would do this.

1:10:10.400 --> 1:10:13.519
<v Speaker 1>They're already trying to declare failure on the North Korea

1:10:13.600 --> 1:10:16.600
<v Speaker 1>nuclear negotiations the Trump administrations engaged in. Where do you

1:10:16.600 --> 1:10:20.479
<v Speaker 1>come down on that cordon? Well, they haven't failed, but

1:10:20.600 --> 1:10:24.600
<v Speaker 1>they are failing. We've got to remember buck that nobody,

1:10:24.920 --> 1:10:27.960
<v Speaker 1>nobody has ever enticed the Kim regime into good behavior

1:10:28.439 --> 1:10:31.600
<v Speaker 1>over the long term, not the Chinese, not the Russians,

1:10:31.640 --> 1:10:35.200
<v Speaker 1>not the South Koreans. And this is exactly what Trump

1:10:35.320 --> 1:10:37.679
<v Speaker 1>is doing. A matter of fact, this is what Trump

1:10:37.720 --> 1:10:40.280
<v Speaker 1>said he was doing at the Ottawa g seven just

1:10:40.320 --> 1:10:43.400
<v Speaker 1>before the historic June's Summit last year with Kim Jong un.

1:10:44.000 --> 1:10:46.600
<v Speaker 1>President Trump said, look, I'm going to give Kim a

1:10:46.680 --> 1:10:50.000
<v Speaker 1>quote unquote one time shot. That's a one time shot

1:10:50.080 --> 1:10:53.519
<v Speaker 1>to do the right thing. Trump wanted to make him

1:10:53.520 --> 1:10:56.160
<v Speaker 1>feel secure enough so that he would give up his weapons.

1:10:56.680 --> 1:11:00.960
<v Speaker 1>But since you know that one time shot started. You know,

1:11:01.000 --> 1:11:03.519
<v Speaker 1>we've seen Kim move in all the wrong directions, So

1:11:03.560 --> 1:11:05.680
<v Speaker 1>I think it's time for the president to pivot, go

1:11:05.760 --> 1:11:08.719
<v Speaker 1>back to the policies that made him successful, which were

1:11:08.880 --> 1:11:11.680
<v Speaker 1>to really enforce sanctions in a way that made the

1:11:12.200 --> 1:11:17.800
<v Speaker 1>regime in kiang Yang hurt. Now, what should Trump do

1:11:17.880 --> 1:11:21.960
<v Speaker 1>given that there's this intransigence. I think that we should

1:11:22.640 --> 1:11:25.720
<v Speaker 1>first of all, go after the Chinese banks for continuing

1:11:25.760 --> 1:11:30.000
<v Speaker 1>to launder money for the North Koreans. The Trump administration

1:11:30.080 --> 1:11:34.280
<v Speaker 1>on June twenty ninth, twenty seventeen, designated Bank of Doundong

1:11:34.479 --> 1:11:37.559
<v Speaker 1>a primary money laundering concern under the Patriot Act. That

1:11:37.720 --> 1:11:41.479
<v Speaker 1>disconnected the bank from the global system because it could

1:11:41.560 --> 1:11:44.639
<v Speaker 1>no longer transact business in dollar. That was a warning.

1:11:45.000 --> 1:11:48.120
<v Speaker 1>We know that, but Banka Dondong is a real small institution.

1:11:48.520 --> 1:11:51.479
<v Speaker 1>We also know that all of China's Big four have

1:11:51.640 --> 1:11:54.760
<v Speaker 1>been laundering for the Kim regime, and we should be

1:11:54.840 --> 1:11:59.000
<v Speaker 1>imposing at least fines and maybe even disconnecting them from

1:11:59.160 --> 1:12:02.320
<v Speaker 1>the global system him That would be a warning shot

1:12:02.360 --> 1:12:05.439
<v Speaker 1>that Beijing could not ignore. We also need to go

1:12:05.479 --> 1:12:09.200
<v Speaker 1>after the South Koreans for busting sanctions, as well as

1:12:09.200 --> 1:12:12.519
<v Speaker 1>the Russians. You know, people violate sanctions because the US

1:12:12.680 --> 1:12:15.720
<v Speaker 1>is not stopping them. We stopped them. Kim Jong hun

1:12:15.880 --> 1:12:19.080
<v Speaker 1>is then forced to either keep his weapons or survive,

1:12:19.360 --> 1:12:23.120
<v Speaker 1>and in that case, he's going to choose survival. All right, everybody.

1:12:23.200 --> 1:12:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Gordon Chang check out his Twitter handle Gordon ge Chang

1:12:27.000 --> 1:12:31.120
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter, and also Gordon Chang dot com for his website. Gordon,

1:12:31.160 --> 1:12:34.040
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much, Thank you, Buck team. We'll be

1:12:34.120 --> 1:12:39.040
<v Speaker 1>right back. Okazio Cortez is in many ways in the

1:12:39.120 --> 1:12:41.920
<v Speaker 1>vanguard of the Democratic Party. Some say she's almost the

1:12:42.479 --> 1:12:47.240
<v Speaker 1>de facto spiritual leader of the progressive left. She does

1:12:47.280 --> 1:12:49.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of social media stuff. She runs all over

1:12:49.840 --> 1:12:52.960
<v Speaker 1>the place and takes these little homemade videos, puts them

1:12:52.960 --> 1:12:56.360
<v Speaker 1>on Instagram and they get millions of views. Well. In

1:12:56.400 --> 1:12:58.280
<v Speaker 1>her most recent one, it seemed that she was in

1:12:58.320 --> 1:13:04.280
<v Speaker 1>fact terrified by a garbage disposal. Play it. I am

1:13:04.320 --> 1:13:09.280
<v Speaker 1>told this is a garbage disposal. I've never seen a

1:13:09.360 --> 1:13:13.000
<v Speaker 1>garbage disposal. I never had one in any place I've

1:13:13.040 --> 1:13:18.519
<v Speaker 1>ever lived. It is terrifying. I don't know what for

1:13:19.640 --> 1:13:24.360
<v Speaker 1>or what its purpose is, like food scraps, like is

1:13:24.400 --> 1:13:31.719
<v Speaker 1>this environmentally sound? I don't know, well, like I'm pretty

1:13:31.720 --> 1:13:35.320
<v Speaker 1>sure it's for the disposing of garbage. But we get

1:13:35.320 --> 1:13:38.839
<v Speaker 1>into the some more. Okazio Cortez had a parody account

1:13:38.880 --> 1:13:40.640
<v Speaker 1>of her, and she is hard to parody, so I

1:13:40.680 --> 1:13:43.439
<v Speaker 1>give that person credit. It turns out that that parody

1:13:43.439 --> 1:13:47.360
<v Speaker 1>account was recently banned from Twitter. So what are the

1:13:47.439 --> 1:13:50.519
<v Speaker 1>rules here? What do the social media czars in Silicon

1:13:50.680 --> 1:13:54.599
<v Speaker 1>Valley get to determine? And where should we go from here?

1:13:54.640 --> 1:13:57.880
<v Speaker 1>We've got our buddy Will Chamberlain on the line. He

1:13:58.000 --> 1:13:59.920
<v Speaker 1>is the publisher of Human Events. He has some thought

1:14:00.240 --> 1:14:03.040
<v Speaker 1>on these things. Well, great to have. You're gonna be

1:14:03.040 --> 1:14:06.439
<v Speaker 1>with you back, all right. So now Twitter's gonna ban

1:14:06.640 --> 1:14:09.360
<v Speaker 1>parody accounts that are marked as parody. I mean, this

1:14:09.800 --> 1:14:13.200
<v Speaker 1>seems to be beyond farce. Well, I mean, you got

1:14:13.200 --> 1:14:16.000
<v Speaker 1>to realize that Twitter's principle here is not some consistent,

1:14:16.640 --> 1:14:20.400
<v Speaker 1>broad application of a rule against parody accounts, but rather

1:14:20.520 --> 1:14:24.519
<v Speaker 1>a particularly privileged interpretation of those rules that say that

1:14:24.880 --> 1:14:27.000
<v Speaker 1>if you're a liberal and you parody a conservative, well

1:14:27.000 --> 1:14:29.480
<v Speaker 1>that's just fine in dandy. But if you're a conservative

1:14:29.720 --> 1:14:32.439
<v Speaker 1>and you effectively parody a liberal, well that's that we

1:14:32.520 --> 1:14:35.680
<v Speaker 1>just can't have that, candily, So that's the real point.

1:14:36.040 --> 1:14:38.559
<v Speaker 1>The double standard is obvious in many ways. But you

1:14:38.560 --> 1:14:40.240
<v Speaker 1>know what I want to ask is what should the

1:14:40.320 --> 1:14:43.639
<v Speaker 1>standard be? You know, David French over National Review put

1:14:43.640 --> 1:14:47.719
<v Speaker 1>out a piece today where he's essentially imploring these Silicon

1:14:47.880 --> 1:14:55.599
<v Speaker 1>Valley social media giants to voluntarily adopt viewpoint neutral First

1:14:55.600 --> 1:14:59.320
<v Speaker 1>Amendment protections via their platform. This sounds great to me,

1:14:59.439 --> 1:15:02.760
<v Speaker 1>except there's no way they're going to do this, right.

1:15:02.800 --> 1:15:05.559
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this sounds like as likely to happen as

1:15:05.600 --> 1:15:10.479
<v Speaker 1>the Democratic Party to decide the wholesale abandon planned parenthood

1:15:10.479 --> 1:15:13.800
<v Speaker 1>and embrace a pro life position. The people that he

1:15:13.920 --> 1:15:16.439
<v Speaker 1>is appealing to are completely on the other side of

1:15:16.439 --> 1:15:19.760
<v Speaker 1>the political spectrum than him and want him and his

1:15:19.880 --> 1:15:23.519
<v Speaker 1>fellow travelers to lose election. So to try and persuade

1:15:23.560 --> 1:15:26.120
<v Speaker 1>them that they should be viewpoint neutral is sort of

1:15:26.160 --> 1:15:28.800
<v Speaker 1>a feudal exercise. One should realize who one has the

1:15:28.840 --> 1:15:32.400
<v Speaker 1>capacity to persuade, and in this case, perhaps we do

1:15:32.520 --> 1:15:35.439
<v Speaker 1>have the ability to persuade Silicon Valley of certain things,

1:15:35.479 --> 1:15:39.200
<v Speaker 1>but only under duress. What do you think we should do?

1:15:39.479 --> 1:15:42.559
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the bias and social media is obvious at

1:15:42.560 --> 1:15:46.400
<v Speaker 1>this point, and people who pretend that there isn't an

1:15:46.479 --> 1:15:50.640
<v Speaker 1>effort to silence, to punish, and to really downgrade in

1:15:50.680 --> 1:15:53.599
<v Speaker 1>the national conversation conservative points of view. I think they're

1:15:53.600 --> 1:15:56.679
<v Speaker 1>just being other, dishonest or delusional. What do we do though,

1:15:56.680 --> 1:16:01.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, in a world where Facebook is Facebook and

1:16:01.160 --> 1:16:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Twitter alone are determining a lot of what people see, read,

1:16:05.200 --> 1:16:09.000
<v Speaker 1>and here, what's the answer for conservatives who don't want

1:16:09.000 --> 1:16:15.640
<v Speaker 1>to live by these very biased and mercurial rules. So

1:16:16.080 --> 1:16:20.519
<v Speaker 1>I have two core recommendations for conservatives generally and the

1:16:20.560 --> 1:16:24.640
<v Speaker 1>conservative movement. So the first is a framing recommendation. I

1:16:24.640 --> 1:16:28.320
<v Speaker 1>believe we should be framing access to large social media

1:16:28.360 --> 1:16:32.639
<v Speaker 1>platforms as a civil right because in the same way

1:16:33.040 --> 1:16:38.680
<v Speaker 1>that private discrimination was rendering the Constitution's commitment to the

1:16:38.720 --> 1:16:41.439
<v Speaker 1>equality of people sort of a dead letter in the

1:16:41.520 --> 1:16:44.360
<v Speaker 1>Jim Crow South in the nineteen forties and nineteen fifties,

1:16:44.560 --> 1:16:48.439
<v Speaker 1>and we needed federal law to fix that and make

1:16:48.479 --> 1:16:51.720
<v Speaker 1>it so that stopped. I see a similar dynamic here

1:16:52.000 --> 1:16:56.080
<v Speaker 1>where in a world where the vast majority of serious

1:16:56.080 --> 1:16:59.760
<v Speaker 1>political discourse occurs on major social media platforms. To make

1:16:59.800 --> 1:17:03.840
<v Speaker 1>the underlying cultural commitment, we have to free speech more

1:17:03.880 --> 1:17:07.680
<v Speaker 1>than a dead letter. We need to actually impose restrictions

1:17:07.680 --> 1:17:11.240
<v Speaker 1>on social media companies, and the way to justify that

1:17:11.600 --> 1:17:14.240
<v Speaker 1>is to say the right to speak on these platforms

1:17:14.320 --> 1:17:17.120
<v Speaker 1>is a civil right and that private companies don't have

1:17:17.280 --> 1:17:19.679
<v Speaker 1>should not have the ability to violate it. So that's

1:17:19.800 --> 1:17:25.360
<v Speaker 1>part one. The second yeah, part two. Part two is

1:17:25.720 --> 1:17:28.920
<v Speaker 1>we should be aiming to pass legislation at both the

1:17:29.000 --> 1:17:33.799
<v Speaker 1>state and federal level where that creating essentially a consumer

1:17:33.840 --> 1:17:38.439
<v Speaker 1>protection law that says something along these lines. If Facebook

1:17:38.520 --> 1:17:41.880
<v Speaker 1>or Twitter bans you for lawful speech, and what you

1:17:41.880 --> 1:17:44.120
<v Speaker 1>should be able to do is the very next day,

1:17:44.479 --> 1:17:48.280
<v Speaker 1>walk into a courthouse get an injunction against Facebook or

1:17:48.320 --> 1:17:51.200
<v Speaker 1>Twitter or Instagram that forces them to restore your account.

1:17:51.439 --> 1:17:54.080
<v Speaker 1>In addition, force them to pay your attorney sees and

1:17:54.160 --> 1:17:57.439
<v Speaker 1>in further impose a further statutory penalty. Right. I want

1:17:57.479 --> 1:17:59.320
<v Speaker 1>to this is a private right of action. I want

1:17:59.320 --> 1:18:01.840
<v Speaker 1>to make it possible. So if you are, if you

1:18:01.880 --> 1:18:03.880
<v Speaker 1>have your account wrongfully taken away from you by one

1:18:03.880 --> 1:18:07.599
<v Speaker 1>of these companies, you can tomorrow go to court and

1:18:07.600 --> 1:18:10.000
<v Speaker 1>a judge will give you an injunction forcing Twitter to

1:18:10.040 --> 1:18:14.320
<v Speaker 1>get it back to you. Sounds good to me. Anyone

1:18:14.320 --> 1:18:18.600
<v Speaker 1>else on board for this, well, I think I'm the

1:18:18.680 --> 1:18:20.920
<v Speaker 1>only person on the line. So I am firmly on

1:18:20.920 --> 1:18:23.160
<v Speaker 1>board for my own idea. No, I mean, I mean,

1:18:24.479 --> 1:18:27.280
<v Speaker 1>does anyone else trying to support your idea here? Have

1:18:27.400 --> 1:18:30.439
<v Speaker 1>you gotten to anyone in Congress or other publications or

1:18:30.479 --> 1:18:33.960
<v Speaker 1>other you know who else is on board? So I

1:18:34.000 --> 1:18:36.680
<v Speaker 1>mean the Ron Coleman, a lawyer on Twitter, was the

1:18:36.760 --> 1:18:39.559
<v Speaker 1>sort of the originator of the idea, especially of focusing

1:18:39.600 --> 1:18:44.559
<v Speaker 1>on state consumer protection. The legislation, you know, we the

1:18:44.720 --> 1:18:47.640
<v Speaker 1>article that I first proposed this in, uh you know,

1:18:47.680 --> 1:18:49.519
<v Speaker 1>we just came out two days ago, and so we

1:18:49.560 --> 1:18:52.639
<v Speaker 1>haven't really gotten a full fledged movement behind the legislay

1:18:52.680 --> 1:18:56.600
<v Speaker 1>to push yet. But that said, I mean, the formulation

1:18:57.400 --> 1:18:59.720
<v Speaker 1>of the right to speak on social media platforms as

1:19:00.000 --> 1:19:01.839
<v Speaker 1>of a right has gotten a huge amount of traction

1:19:02.080 --> 1:19:04.840
<v Speaker 1>very very quickly. Denish to SUSA picked it up on

1:19:05.200 --> 1:19:08.559
<v Speaker 1>Laura Ingraham Show. Paul Jesseph Watson picked it up on

1:19:08.640 --> 1:19:11.439
<v Speaker 1>his own YouTube, and since he was the person that

1:19:11.520 --> 1:19:13.920
<v Speaker 1>was purged by Facebook and sort of the most recent

1:19:14.040 --> 1:19:16.679
<v Speaker 1>catalyst for all this, that was a big deal too.

1:19:16.720 --> 1:19:19.840
<v Speaker 1>And Broncos, a cartoonist that Legal Insurrection, seems to have

1:19:19.880 --> 1:19:22.000
<v Speaker 1>also picked up on it pretty clearly by posting a

1:19:22.000 --> 1:19:25.280
<v Speaker 1>cartoon that analogizes the social media fight to the civil

1:19:25.360 --> 1:19:29.160
<v Speaker 1>rights Now No, Raheem Kassam is a beloved member of

1:19:29.200 --> 1:19:32.000
<v Speaker 1>this circus that we run here called the Freedom Hunt

1:19:33.200 --> 1:19:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Right Sexton Show obviously, and will you know therefore as

1:19:37.000 --> 1:19:39.439
<v Speaker 1>a as a human events person, you're also in the

1:19:39.479 --> 1:19:41.960
<v Speaker 1>broader family. I just want to know what for all

1:19:42.000 --> 1:19:44.559
<v Speaker 1>the folks listening tell me about we got about a minute.

1:19:44.640 --> 1:19:46.160
<v Speaker 1>What are you doing a human events and why should

1:19:46.160 --> 1:19:49.040
<v Speaker 1>folks go check it out? So this is the oldest

1:19:49.040 --> 1:19:51.960
<v Speaker 1>conservative magazine in the country, started in nineteen forty four,

1:19:52.000 --> 1:19:54.840
<v Speaker 1>and we've relaunched it. It was defunk for about five years,

1:19:55.720 --> 1:19:58.120
<v Speaker 1>and we're bringing you I think you should really go

1:19:58.200 --> 1:19:59.920
<v Speaker 1>check out the website because I think you'll see it

1:20:00.120 --> 1:20:03.880
<v Speaker 1>different from anything else in conservative media. We are publishing beautiful,

1:20:04.200 --> 1:20:10.280
<v Speaker 1>long form, interesting and thought provoking articles that I think

1:20:10.320 --> 1:20:12.679
<v Speaker 1>you'll really get a kick out of and that will

1:20:12.680 --> 1:20:15.840
<v Speaker 1>really make you think. So that's the core of what

1:20:15.840 --> 1:20:18.559
<v Speaker 1>we're doing, and we're not trying to be clickbaity, you know,

1:20:18.600 --> 1:20:20.600
<v Speaker 1>our core. The way we're trying to fund this is

1:20:20.600 --> 1:20:23.719
<v Speaker 1>through memberships and if you come a member of founding

1:20:23.720 --> 1:20:25.479
<v Speaker 1>Father of Human Events as it where you can get

1:20:25.520 --> 1:20:27.920
<v Speaker 1>access to a group chat with me and Ride Kassan

1:20:28.720 --> 1:20:30.680
<v Speaker 1>and others as well, where you can talk with us

1:20:30.680 --> 1:20:33.080
<v Speaker 1>about what we're doing, how we're doing it, and what

1:20:33.120 --> 1:20:35.519
<v Speaker 1>we're publishing. So all right, I don't know Human events

1:20:35.560 --> 1:20:39.000
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Everybody check it out. Publisher Will Chamberlain will

1:20:39.080 --> 1:20:40.639
<v Speaker 1>great to have you on my friend. Come back soon,

1:20:41.600 --> 1:20:45.000
<v Speaker 1>all right, thanks buck. Oh you've got here a bunch

1:20:45.000 --> 1:20:48.720
<v Speaker 1>of protesters, a bunch of pseudo Christian protesters who've been

1:20:48.720 --> 1:20:51.080
<v Speaker 1>out here shaming young girls for being here. So here's

1:20:51.080 --> 1:20:52.840
<v Speaker 1>the deal. I've got one hundred dollars to anybody who

1:20:52.880 --> 1:20:55.040
<v Speaker 1>will identify any of these three. So we're going to

1:20:55.080 --> 1:20:58.880
<v Speaker 1>do I'm going to donate the plant. Look a bunch

1:20:58.920 --> 1:21:01.320
<v Speaker 1>of white people ending up of a plant, power rights

1:21:02.040 --> 1:21:05.000
<v Speaker 1>shaming people. There's nothing Christian about what you're doing. Nothing

1:21:05.080 --> 1:21:08.679
<v Speaker 1>Christians at all about what you're doing. Hi, nothing Christian

1:21:08.800 --> 1:21:10.559
<v Speaker 1>or loving or godly about what you're doing. So I've

1:21:10.560 --> 1:21:13.720
<v Speaker 1>got one hundred dollars to anybody who will identify. One

1:21:13.760 --> 1:21:16.280
<v Speaker 1>hundred dollars. Rich. What makes you think that it's your

1:21:16.360 --> 1:21:18.200
<v Speaker 1>job to tell women what's right for their bodies? And

1:21:18.280 --> 1:21:20.280
<v Speaker 1>the truth is, I'm not really asking because I don't care.

1:21:20.400 --> 1:21:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Shame on you. Well, that was Pennsylvania's State Rep. Brian Simms,

1:21:25.120 --> 1:21:28.960
<v Speaker 1>who not content merely to harass an elderly woman who

1:21:29.040 --> 1:21:32.840
<v Speaker 1>is exercising her First Amendment rights to advocate for the

1:21:33.040 --> 1:21:36.000
<v Speaker 1>lives of the unborn outside of a planned parative clinic,

1:21:36.240 --> 1:21:39.360
<v Speaker 1>but now wants to This guy wants to docks and

1:21:39.479 --> 1:21:43.200
<v Speaker 1>is offering a bounty, offering money to people who will docks,

1:21:43.320 --> 1:21:46.640
<v Speaker 1>some young people who are trying to also spread a

1:21:46.680 --> 1:21:50.360
<v Speaker 1>message of life. This did not go over well with

1:21:50.840 --> 1:21:54.800
<v Speaker 1>people in the pro life community, rightfully so. And we're

1:21:54.880 --> 1:21:57.040
<v Speaker 1>joined now by one person who is going to have

1:21:57.600 --> 1:22:00.280
<v Speaker 1>some thoughts to share on the whole fiasco and also

1:22:00.320 --> 1:22:03.240
<v Speaker 1>what really matters here. Lila Rose is with us. She

1:22:03.320 --> 1:22:08.400
<v Speaker 1>is the founder and president of Live Action. Lila, thank

1:22:08.400 --> 1:22:10.200
<v Speaker 1>you so much for giving us some of your time.

1:22:10.920 --> 1:22:14.559
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for having me back. So you are going to

1:22:14.600 --> 1:22:19.160
<v Speaker 1>be engaging in a prey in what exactly is happening

1:22:19.160 --> 1:22:22.360
<v Speaker 1>in response to what's going on outside this plan parenthood

1:22:22.360 --> 1:22:27.200
<v Speaker 1>clinic in Philadelphia where this elected official is verbally abusing people,

1:22:27.400 --> 1:22:30.080
<v Speaker 1>being threatening toward people, putting it on his Facebook, putting

1:22:30.120 --> 1:22:31.960
<v Speaker 1>it on Twitter, sharing it all over the place. You

1:22:32.120 --> 1:22:34.200
<v Speaker 1>and other pro life advocates are going to do what

1:22:34.320 --> 1:22:37.439
<v Speaker 1>in response? Sure, So we're going there to support the

1:22:37.520 --> 1:22:41.840
<v Speaker 1>local community because there have been wonderful folks in Pennsylvania

1:22:41.840 --> 1:22:44.040
<v Speaker 1>who have been praying outside the planned parent has there

1:22:44.280 --> 1:22:47.280
<v Speaker 1>and this one in particular for years now, doing peaceful

1:22:47.320 --> 1:22:49.920
<v Speaker 1>sidewalk counseling, trying to help women in need and support

1:22:50.000 --> 1:22:53.120
<v Speaker 1>women with other options, the most of all praying, and

1:22:53.160 --> 1:22:55.000
<v Speaker 1>that's what you see on the video, I mean, Brian

1:22:55.080 --> 1:22:59.000
<v Speaker 1>sends this elected representative for the state House in Pennsylvania

1:22:59.400 --> 1:23:01.800
<v Speaker 1>is her king a group of three teen girls and

1:23:01.880 --> 1:23:05.519
<v Speaker 1>their moms who are praying peacefully and harassing getting up

1:23:05.520 --> 1:23:09.080
<v Speaker 1>in the face of an elderly woman holding a rosary praying,

1:23:09.479 --> 1:23:13.840
<v Speaker 1>calling them bullies, making fun of their their race, making

1:23:13.880 --> 1:23:17.679
<v Speaker 1>fun of their prayer, calling on his followers to docs

1:23:17.680 --> 1:23:21.559
<v Speaker 1>them docs teen girls, and again they just respond by praying.

1:23:21.600 --> 1:23:23.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's what they're there to do, to pray

1:23:23.040 --> 1:23:25.200
<v Speaker 1>for an end abortion. So Live Action will be going

1:23:25.200 --> 1:23:27.560
<v Speaker 1>out there as well as other groups to supporting incredible

1:23:27.880 --> 1:23:31.240
<v Speaker 1>work of local activists who are peacefully praying for an

1:23:31.240 --> 1:23:34.640
<v Speaker 1>intro abortion in Pennsylvania. If anyone hearing this wants to

1:23:34.800 --> 1:23:36.559
<v Speaker 1>join you by the way if they want to know

1:23:37.120 --> 1:23:39.439
<v Speaker 1>where this is happening and how they can be a

1:23:39.560 --> 1:23:42.280
<v Speaker 1>part of it, where should they go? Sure, so there's

1:23:42.360 --> 1:23:44.679
<v Speaker 1>a if you go to my Twitter feed Lilah gray Throws,

1:23:45.040 --> 1:23:47.080
<v Speaker 1>you can get information on the time and the address

1:23:47.120 --> 1:23:50.080
<v Speaker 1>eleven am on Friday morning at this planned parenthead There's

1:23:50.080 --> 1:23:52.960
<v Speaker 1>also a Facebook event that Live Action aid is linked to,

1:23:53.360 --> 1:23:56.160
<v Speaker 1>so if you are local in Pennsylvania and Philadelphia, please

1:23:56.200 --> 1:23:59.360
<v Speaker 1>head over and join. This is a prayerful protest. We

1:24:00.160 --> 1:24:02.920
<v Speaker 1>stand down to bullies, but we don't respond to bullying

1:24:02.920 --> 1:24:06.160
<v Speaker 1>with bullying. We respond to it with love. The endgame here,

1:24:06.320 --> 1:24:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Buck is to end abortion, is to educate others about

1:24:10.200 --> 1:24:13.479
<v Speaker 1>what abortion does, the violent act that it is. It's

1:24:13.520 --> 1:24:16.920
<v Speaker 1>about advocating for other options for women and girls. It's

1:24:16.960 --> 1:24:21.200
<v Speaker 1>about proclaiming that human beings have dignity and value. I mean,

1:24:21.240 --> 1:24:23.320
<v Speaker 1>I would fight for the right to life of Brian Sins,

1:24:23.320 --> 1:24:28.280
<v Speaker 1>this representative, just like anybody else. And it's saying that bullying, harassment,

1:24:28.720 --> 1:24:32.000
<v Speaker 1>doxing against those who are standing for life will not be,

1:24:32.479 --> 1:24:35.240
<v Speaker 1>will not be. We will stand up to it. We're

1:24:35.280 --> 1:24:38.280
<v Speaker 1>not going to back down. And I'm excited to know

1:24:38.439 --> 1:24:41.719
<v Speaker 1>that there are hundreds of people who are already saying

1:24:41.720 --> 1:24:44.360
<v Speaker 1>you want to be there because people are passionate about

1:24:44.360 --> 1:24:46.519
<v Speaker 1>this and they will not stand down. They will not

1:24:46.520 --> 1:24:50.160
<v Speaker 1>stand down to bullies. Your group is obviously also very

1:24:50.200 --> 1:24:54.400
<v Speaker 1>active in general in the pro life movement. Tell me

1:24:54.479 --> 1:24:59.280
<v Speaker 1>about the latest from different state legislatures. I see here

1:24:59.320 --> 1:25:03.679
<v Speaker 1>Georgia think is the most recent one that are either

1:25:03.760 --> 1:25:08.400
<v Speaker 1>poised to or have already signed a fetal heartbeat bill.

1:25:08.520 --> 1:25:10.840
<v Speaker 1>What are these bills? What do they do? And what

1:25:10.920 --> 1:25:13.720
<v Speaker 1>do people need to know about this? Sure, so this

1:25:13.800 --> 1:25:17.040
<v Speaker 1>is a big deal. The heartbeat bill would ban abortions

1:25:17.080 --> 1:25:19.840
<v Speaker 1>after the heartbeat can be detected of the baby by ultrasound,

1:25:19.880 --> 1:25:22.840
<v Speaker 1>So that's about six weeks into a woman's pregnancy. This

1:25:22.920 --> 1:25:25.200
<v Speaker 1>is a baby that's art is already beating. This is

1:25:25.240 --> 1:25:28.320
<v Speaker 1>often before a woman even realizes she's pregnant. So it's

1:25:28.320 --> 1:25:31.759
<v Speaker 1>amazing how early in embryonic development a child's heart begins

1:25:31.800 --> 1:25:35.080
<v Speaker 1>to beat, and it's really exciting. Georgia is the fourth

1:25:35.160 --> 1:25:37.719
<v Speaker 1>state now this year. Governor Kempt just signing this bill

1:25:38.000 --> 1:25:41.800
<v Speaker 1>into law this morning. Georgia's state number four. So Kentucky, Mississippi,

1:25:41.800 --> 1:25:45.400
<v Speaker 1>and Ohio have already passed their own heartbeat bills. This

1:25:45.479 --> 1:25:48.000
<v Speaker 1>is a huge step forward for the prolif movement and

1:25:48.240 --> 1:25:50.680
<v Speaker 1>for human rights because it's finally saying, if you're a

1:25:50.760 --> 1:25:53.200
<v Speaker 1>human with a heartbeat, you should be protected by law.

1:25:53.240 --> 1:25:55.320
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't matter if you're inside the woomb or outside

1:25:55.320 --> 1:25:58.679
<v Speaker 1>the womb. And how many states right now have already

1:25:58.720 --> 1:26:01.000
<v Speaker 1>done this, and also what's the position to this. I'm

1:26:01.040 --> 1:26:06.560
<v Speaker 1>sure that Planned Parenthood and nay roll and other groups

1:26:06.880 --> 1:26:13.439
<v Speaker 1>that defend abortion are mounting a ferocious assault on these bills. Yes,

1:26:13.600 --> 1:26:17.519
<v Speaker 1>I mean ferocious is perhaps an understatement. You may have

1:26:17.560 --> 1:26:22.240
<v Speaker 1>seen Alissa, you know, actress Elissa Milano and others pledging

1:26:22.280 --> 1:26:25.519
<v Speaker 1>to boycott the state of Georgia and not do business

1:26:25.520 --> 1:26:27.720
<v Speaker 1>in the state. You know, Hollywood will refuse to do

1:26:27.760 --> 1:26:30.200
<v Speaker 1>business in the state if they pass this horrible law.

1:26:30.240 --> 1:26:33.559
<v Speaker 1>I mean that is the reaction is boycotts, I mean Hollywood.

1:26:33.560 --> 1:26:35.960
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of good, good riddance. I think Georgia is

1:26:35.960 --> 1:26:40.160
<v Speaker 1>thinking because we'd rather protect life than court Hollywood actors.

1:26:41.040 --> 1:26:43.680
<v Speaker 1>But look, there are four other states that three other

1:26:43.680 --> 1:26:47.120
<v Speaker 1>states have done this just year alone besides Georgia, and

1:26:47.200 --> 1:26:49.320
<v Speaker 1>the laws have not gone into effect yet. They're set

1:26:49.400 --> 1:26:51.680
<v Speaker 1>to go into effect in July. And part of this

1:26:51.800 --> 1:26:55.479
<v Speaker 1>is because there are attacks and challenges made to the

1:26:56.360 --> 1:27:02.000
<v Speaker 1>laws by nay Rao Biplane parenthood by proabortion justices or

1:27:02.080 --> 1:27:04.920
<v Speaker 1>judges who do not want these laws to go into effect,

1:27:04.920 --> 1:27:06.600
<v Speaker 1>who do not think the states have the right to

1:27:06.640 --> 1:27:09.360
<v Speaker 1>do this. Of course, I think that the states absolutely

1:27:09.360 --> 1:27:12.040
<v Speaker 1>have the right to protect human life within their jurisdiction.

1:27:12.080 --> 1:27:14.639
<v Speaker 1>I think that's actually in the interest of the US

1:27:14.720 --> 1:27:17.679
<v Speaker 1>federal government to be concerned with the preservation of human life.

1:27:17.680 --> 1:27:21.639
<v Speaker 1>It's securing a common defense. But because of Rob Wade

1:27:21.640 --> 1:27:24.040
<v Speaker 1>and because of some of the subsequent rulings by the

1:27:24.160 --> 1:27:27.080
<v Speaker 1>US Supreme Court, that has really harmed the ability of

1:27:27.120 --> 1:27:31.080
<v Speaker 1>states to protect children in the womb in their jurisdiction.

1:27:31.160 --> 1:27:33.080
<v Speaker 1>So that's going to it's going to come down to

1:27:33.120 --> 1:27:35.519
<v Speaker 1>the court stuck, and you know, the way the Supreme

1:27:35.560 --> 1:27:38.760
<v Speaker 1>Court is looking right now, it's really troubling. I mean,

1:27:38.880 --> 1:27:41.200
<v Speaker 1>we need to we need another seat on the court.

1:27:41.280 --> 1:27:45.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that's not a far left proabortion villot. Unfortunately,

1:27:45.000 --> 1:27:46.920
<v Speaker 1>we have several of those in the Supreme Court right now.

1:27:47.120 --> 1:27:49.080
<v Speaker 1>So it'll be interesting to see how this plays out.

1:27:49.800 --> 1:27:52.720
<v Speaker 1>If this goes to the US Supreme Court. I don't

1:27:52.760 --> 1:27:54.760
<v Speaker 1>know if you had a chance to hear this, la la,

1:27:54.840 --> 1:27:58.960
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty self explanatory. Though. A former New York City

1:27:59.400 --> 1:28:03.439
<v Speaker 1>council Christine Quinn was on CNN, a place that I

1:28:03.479 --> 1:28:07.639
<v Speaker 1>actually used to also sometimes offer analysis and much much

1:28:07.680 --> 1:28:10.840
<v Speaker 1>to mine now shock and dismay. But she she had

1:28:10.920 --> 1:28:15.280
<v Speaker 1>this to say about what the truth is of infants

1:28:15.280 --> 1:28:18.160
<v Speaker 1>in the womb. Please play the clip. When a woman

1:28:18.479 --> 1:28:22.120
<v Speaker 1>gets pregnant, that is not a human being inside of her,

1:28:22.160 --> 1:28:25.920
<v Speaker 1>it's part of her body. When a woman gets pregnant,

1:28:26.200 --> 1:28:28.880
<v Speaker 1>that is not a human being inside of her, it's

1:28:28.960 --> 1:28:31.800
<v Speaker 1>part of her body. When we get it, I mean,

1:28:31.840 --> 1:28:35.639
<v Speaker 1>that's that's what That's what she said. I yeah, it's

1:28:35.640 --> 1:28:39.440
<v Speaker 1>hard to think of anything that is more scientifically inaccurate.

1:28:39.439 --> 1:28:41.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is kind of like saying my head

1:28:41.240 --> 1:28:45.920
<v Speaker 1>is my foot, but this is applauded somehow. Yeah, I mean,

1:28:46.320 --> 1:28:48.639
<v Speaker 1>this is the leg they have to stand on. Buck

1:28:49.000 --> 1:28:52.800
<v Speaker 1>abortion advocates, the ones who are really honest, admit, it's

1:28:52.800 --> 1:28:55.640
<v Speaker 1>a baby, and we're just gonna be okay with killing it.

1:28:55.640 --> 1:28:57.439
<v Speaker 1>And those are some of the folks who are behind

1:28:57.720 --> 1:28:59.960
<v Speaker 1>the New York law. And they were celebrating. I don't

1:29:00.000 --> 1:29:02.639
<v Speaker 1>know if you remember, but they were celebrating lighting up

1:29:02.680 --> 1:29:07.120
<v Speaker 1>the Empire State building paint because they were so excited

1:29:07.160 --> 1:29:09.280
<v Speaker 1>that abortion would now be legal through all nine months

1:29:09.280 --> 1:29:14.120
<v Speaker 1>and even committing potentially and fantasied infants to survive abortion attempts.

1:29:14.400 --> 1:29:17.200
<v Speaker 1>So when you see this from some abortion advocates saying, well,

1:29:17.240 --> 1:29:19.240
<v Speaker 1>it's not a baby and a woman isn't pregnant with

1:29:19.280 --> 1:29:21.639
<v Speaker 1>the human beings to primember with their own body, I mean,

1:29:21.680 --> 1:29:25.240
<v Speaker 1>it's obviously ridiculous. It flies in the face of everything

1:29:25.280 --> 1:29:27.800
<v Speaker 1>we know about the development of an embryo in the womb,

1:29:27.840 --> 1:29:31.160
<v Speaker 1>how it's a unique, distinct individual life. We know that

1:29:31.160 --> 1:29:35.320
<v Speaker 1>that's a fact of any biology book. The problem with facts, though,

1:29:35.439 --> 1:29:39.400
<v Speaker 1>buck is they have consequences, and if we acknowledge that

1:29:39.560 --> 1:29:41.719
<v Speaker 1>this is a human life, then all of a sudden

1:29:41.720 --> 1:29:43.560
<v Speaker 1>we have to ask the question of it should it

1:29:43.640 --> 1:29:46.360
<v Speaker 1>be okay to take that human life away from them?

1:29:46.439 --> 1:29:48.320
<v Speaker 1>It should it be okay to end that human life?

1:29:48.600 --> 1:29:50.960
<v Speaker 1>And that is exactly the pro life pro choice debate,

1:29:51.040 --> 1:29:54.000
<v Speaker 1>And unfortunately a lot of pro abortion supporters I call

1:29:54.040 --> 1:29:56.360
<v Speaker 1>them pro abortion because I don't actually think they're about choice,

1:29:56.400 --> 1:29:58.960
<v Speaker 1>but a lot of the self named pro choice supporters

1:29:58.960 --> 1:30:02.240
<v Speaker 1>they don't want to have that, Ila, because they recognize

1:30:02.240 --> 1:30:04.200
<v Speaker 1>that if you could acknowledge it's the human life all

1:30:04.240 --> 1:30:06.400
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden, you have to be willing to say

1:30:06.760 --> 1:30:10.080
<v Speaker 1>that some human beings don't matter, that some human beings

1:30:10.120 --> 1:30:12.559
<v Speaker 1>don't have a right to live, that it's okay for older,

1:30:12.640 --> 1:30:15.920
<v Speaker 1>stronger human beings to kill younger, weaker human beings. And

1:30:16.040 --> 1:30:17.920
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't sound very good. So they're going to try

1:30:17.920 --> 1:30:21.080
<v Speaker 1>to ignore that part of the discussion by just flat

1:30:21.080 --> 1:30:22.760
<v Speaker 1>out saying it's not even a human to begin with.

1:30:23.840 --> 1:30:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Lila Rose, founder and president of Live Action, Lila, always

1:30:28.200 --> 1:30:29.720
<v Speaker 1>a pleasure to talk to you. Thank you so much

1:30:29.760 --> 1:30:33.040
<v Speaker 1>for joining us, Thanks for having me on. All right team,

1:30:33.120 --> 1:30:34.960
<v Speaker 1>We'll be right back. I didn't talk at all about

1:30:35.000 --> 1:30:37.719
<v Speaker 1>the Kentucky Derby, which happened over the weekend. My favorite

1:30:37.720 --> 1:30:40.400
<v Speaker 1>thing or the cool names the horses have. Beyond that,

1:30:40.960 --> 1:30:42.880
<v Speaker 1>I know almost nothing but horse racing. I've never even

1:30:42.880 --> 1:30:44.880
<v Speaker 1>been to Louisville. I should probably go there at some

1:30:44.920 --> 1:30:47.240
<v Speaker 1>point and check it out. Producer Mike, though, has some

1:30:47.280 --> 1:30:49.880
<v Speaker 1>thoughts on this. He's way more into sports and just

1:30:49.920 --> 1:30:53.000
<v Speaker 1>generally being an American than me. Mike, what was the

1:30:53.280 --> 1:30:58.800
<v Speaker 1>controversy exactly? So, yeah, the winner of the derby. The

1:30:58.840 --> 1:31:02.840
<v Speaker 1>original winner got this qualified for running into another horse,

1:31:03.040 --> 1:31:05.320
<v Speaker 1>and this had never happened before, so they basically took

1:31:05.320 --> 1:31:08.040
<v Speaker 1>his tile away, and you know, people were up in

1:31:08.120 --> 1:31:12.360
<v Speaker 1>arms for many reasons. And then the President tweeted about

1:31:12.360 --> 1:31:15.720
<v Speaker 1>it and said the best horse didn't win, and then

1:31:15.760 --> 1:31:18.840
<v Speaker 1>that made it a major story. So I started digging

1:31:18.840 --> 1:31:21.880
<v Speaker 1>in a little deeper and following it on the mainstream media.

1:31:21.960 --> 1:31:24.880
<v Speaker 1>And the consensus of the mainstream media was that they

1:31:24.880 --> 1:31:26.680
<v Speaker 1>got it right, that they should have taken away from

1:31:26.720 --> 1:31:30.120
<v Speaker 1>him and given it to the second place source. And

1:31:30.680 --> 1:31:33.320
<v Speaker 1>whenever the mainstream media says that they got it right,

1:31:33.360 --> 1:31:35.280
<v Speaker 1>I tendn't believe that they means they got it wrong.

1:31:35.560 --> 1:31:38.360
<v Speaker 1>And I actually agree with with Trump here that they

1:31:38.560 --> 1:31:41.479
<v Speaker 1>should not have done it, and I think they should

1:31:41.520 --> 1:31:44.120
<v Speaker 1>have given it to the original winner. Do you do

1:31:44.160 --> 1:31:47.799
<v Speaker 1>you ever go in the bet on the ponies? Wherever

1:31:47.960 --> 1:31:51.240
<v Speaker 1>the nearest place? I actually have and not reason. It's

1:31:51.280 --> 1:31:52.719
<v Speaker 1>a fun of it. I've never been to the Derby.

1:31:52.760 --> 1:31:54.559
<v Speaker 1>I go to the Belmont Stakes here in New York

1:31:54.880 --> 1:31:56.640
<v Speaker 1>and it's a blast to do. It's a lot of

1:31:56.640 --> 1:31:59.960
<v Speaker 1>fun um So it's definitely worth a day of going out,

1:32:00.240 --> 1:32:02.720
<v Speaker 1>and especially when it's nice out. But I don't know

1:32:02.720 --> 1:32:04.479
<v Speaker 1>too much about it. I just go to you know,

1:32:04.600 --> 1:32:07.400
<v Speaker 1>for the cocktails and the fancy dresses and and you

1:32:07.439 --> 1:32:09.760
<v Speaker 1>know that stuff that sounds like a fun time to me,

1:32:10.080 --> 1:32:12.040
<v Speaker 1>it is. It's a lot it's actually a lot of fun.

1:32:12.720 --> 1:32:15.839
<v Speaker 1>You brought another story to my attention, and it's about

1:32:16.960 --> 1:32:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Trump wanting to explain this to me. For people that

1:32:20.360 --> 1:32:23.200
<v Speaker 1>are in the military service academies, they could go pro

1:32:23.439 --> 1:32:26.599
<v Speaker 1>right away and then serve after their pro career. What's

1:32:26.680 --> 1:32:28.960
<v Speaker 1>what's the significance here? Correct? So, yeah, if you're a

1:32:29.040 --> 1:32:31.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines, and if you're

1:32:31.280 --> 1:32:34.439
<v Speaker 1>in a sports program there. Uh. The most notable example

1:32:34.560 --> 1:32:37.559
<v Speaker 1>would be David Robinson, the basketball player. U he had

1:32:37.600 --> 1:32:40.439
<v Speaker 1>to you know, he was an outstanding player, an NBA legend.

1:32:40.520 --> 1:32:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Now he's in the Hall of Fame. But when believe

1:32:42.360 --> 1:32:44.960
<v Speaker 1>his nickname was the Admiral that he never quite reaching

1:32:44.960 --> 1:32:48.479
<v Speaker 1>the rank of admiral exactly. He was the Admiral um.

1:32:48.920 --> 1:32:51.879
<v Speaker 1>So from a from a perspective, if you're an athlete,

1:32:52.000 --> 1:32:54.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, and you really want to play pro, why

1:32:54.479 --> 1:32:56.160
<v Speaker 1>would you go to a service academy If you have to,

1:32:56.240 --> 1:32:58.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, you can't go play. You'd have to wait

1:32:58.479 --> 1:33:00.240
<v Speaker 1>four years, do your time and then go in it,

1:33:00.280 --> 1:33:03.120
<v Speaker 1>and that that hurts you money wise. So the President

1:33:03.200 --> 1:33:06.320
<v Speaker 1>today I thought it was really cool. Um, he wants

1:33:06.360 --> 1:33:10.760
<v Speaker 1>to make a weaver so which will allow U military

1:33:10.840 --> 1:33:13.880
<v Speaker 1>athletes to turn pro and then they can return and

1:33:14.000 --> 1:33:16.799
<v Speaker 1>serve their time to the military after the pro career

1:33:16.960 --> 1:33:19.439
<v Speaker 1>is over, which you know, on the surface is like, oh,

1:33:19.479 --> 1:33:21.280
<v Speaker 1>that's pretty cool. But it's a really big deal for

1:33:21.320 --> 1:33:24.320
<v Speaker 1>the I think our military academies when it comes to recruiting,

1:33:24.600 --> 1:33:27.479
<v Speaker 1>they can now go out there and sell their school

1:33:27.680 --> 1:33:30.960
<v Speaker 1>to the best athletes that in our nation and you'll

1:33:31.000 --> 1:33:33.760
<v Speaker 1>see more prominent you know, imagine Army Navy in the

1:33:33.880 --> 1:33:36.639
<v Speaker 1>top ten rankings in football or basketball. Um. I think

1:33:36.640 --> 1:33:38.240
<v Speaker 1>that's great for our country. I think it's great for

1:33:38.240 --> 1:33:40.880
<v Speaker 1>the students and the student athletes. Yeah, it sounds like

1:33:40.880 --> 1:33:42.160
<v Speaker 1>a great idea to me. I don't I don't see

1:33:42.160 --> 1:33:43.840
<v Speaker 1>any we actually have Trump talking about it. If you

1:33:43.840 --> 1:33:46.720
<v Speaker 1>want to hear it real quick, Yeah, play can I

1:33:46.760 --> 1:33:52.200
<v Speaker 1>call clipall for Clipbuck? Yeah, call for a Proucer Markymark

1:33:52.240 --> 1:33:56.519
<v Speaker 1>play clip fourteen. I mentioned this to the coach and

1:33:56.720 --> 1:34:00.080
<v Speaker 1>it's a big deal. I hope it doesn't become the story,

1:34:00.120 --> 1:34:01.920
<v Speaker 1>but it is a big story because I'm gonna look

1:34:01.920 --> 1:34:07.599
<v Speaker 1>at doing a waiver for service Academy athletes who can

1:34:07.640 --> 1:34:11.720
<v Speaker 1>get into the major leagues like the NFL, hockey, baseball.

1:34:12.360 --> 1:34:14.000
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna see what we're gonna do it and they'll

1:34:14.000 --> 1:34:17.599
<v Speaker 1>serve their time after they've finished with professional sports, and

1:34:17.680 --> 1:34:22.200
<v Speaker 1>that'll make things. Can you imagine this incredible coach with

1:34:22.320 --> 1:34:25.160
<v Speaker 1>that little asset, because I would imagine that would make

1:34:25.200 --> 1:34:28.240
<v Speaker 1>recruiting a little bit easier. So we're gonna in behalf

1:34:28.240 --> 1:34:31.240
<v Speaker 1>of the coach, who's a tremendous guy. We're gonna look

1:34:31.240 --> 1:34:34.040
<v Speaker 1>at a waiver for the service academy so they'll serve

1:34:34.040 --> 1:34:36.479
<v Speaker 1>at that time after. I think it sounds good, right,

1:34:37.880 --> 1:34:39.880
<v Speaker 1>sounds like a cool idea to me. Thanks for bringing

1:34:39.880 --> 1:34:42.439
<v Speaker 1>it to the team's attention, producer Mike. And then here

1:34:42.479 --> 1:34:44.280
<v Speaker 1>we go. So I'm here for good things, all right,

1:34:44.360 --> 1:34:47.040
<v Speaker 1>President Trump? Coming up with you had another way to

1:34:47.680 --> 1:34:50.320
<v Speaker 1>just make things a little make things a little better

1:34:50.360 --> 1:34:54.080
<v Speaker 1>in this country, make America a little more great, one

1:34:54.080 --> 1:34:56.240
<v Speaker 1>little piece at a time. So we are going to

1:34:56.360 --> 1:34:59.200
<v Speaker 1>go into a roll call here in just a moment. Team,

1:34:59.240 --> 1:35:01.559
<v Speaker 1>you know what that means ebook dot com slash buck Sexton.

1:35:01.600 --> 1:35:03.280
<v Speaker 1>If you want to slip one in at the last second,

1:35:03.439 --> 1:35:14.080
<v Speaker 1>we'll be right back. Hey, Team Buck, it's time for

1:35:14.240 --> 1:35:27.599
<v Speaker 1>roll call dot com slash buck Sexton. Forge in on

1:35:27.680 --> 1:35:31.639
<v Speaker 1>the roll call. Such a fun thing, such an easy

1:35:31.640 --> 1:35:33.160
<v Speaker 1>thing to do. You're sitting there like I would like

1:35:33.240 --> 1:35:35.640
<v Speaker 1>to share my thoughts with people across the country. I

1:35:35.720 --> 1:35:41.200
<v Speaker 1>have an idea, and that idea is going to be

1:35:41.200 --> 1:35:43.160
<v Speaker 1>shared with mister buck Sexton, and he will then share

1:35:43.200 --> 1:35:45.360
<v Speaker 1>it with the world, or at least the world of

1:35:45.400 --> 1:35:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Team Buck. Thomas kicks us off today. Hello Buck. Listening

1:35:51.000 --> 1:35:54.320
<v Speaker 1>to you yesterday talking about how the Democrats use lying

1:35:54.400 --> 1:35:57.880
<v Speaker 1>to promote their agenda kind of remind me of the

1:35:57.920 --> 1:36:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Islamic concept of takia. I guess that is more common

1:36:02.160 --> 1:36:06.120
<v Speaker 1>ground between the radical left and radical Islam. Interesting shields

1:36:06.200 --> 1:36:09.599
<v Speaker 1>high Thomas, for those who don't know, is referring to

1:36:09.720 --> 1:36:16.480
<v Speaker 1>a precept within Islam that is taught in some Islamic jurorsprudence.

1:36:16.560 --> 1:36:22.240
<v Speaker 1>Some folks who study Shariah. They promote this idea of takia,

1:36:22.400 --> 1:36:27.400
<v Speaker 1>which is lying for the benefit of the faith. So

1:36:27.439 --> 1:36:29.400
<v Speaker 1>if you have to lie to infidels, I have to

1:36:29.479 --> 1:36:32.200
<v Speaker 1>lie to nonbelievers. If will benefit Islam, then you do that.

1:36:33.320 --> 1:36:37.000
<v Speaker 1>So that's what that's what takia is, and I think

1:36:37.000 --> 1:36:41.200
<v Speaker 1>that Libs do engage in a kind of form of takia,

1:36:41.400 --> 1:36:46.400
<v Speaker 1>especially when it comes to the dishonesty that they engage

1:36:46.439 --> 1:36:50.599
<v Speaker 1>in around things like what their real policy goals are,

1:36:50.680 --> 1:36:56.439
<v Speaker 1>what they're really hoping to achieve, etc. Now, next one

1:36:56.520 --> 1:37:01.720
<v Speaker 1>up here we have Branda who writes, Hey, Buck, if

1:37:01.800 --> 1:37:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Brian Kemp, the governor of Georgia, suppressed the vote, he's

1:37:06.160 --> 1:37:09.040
<v Speaker 1>the worst suppressor of all time because his policy as

1:37:09.040 --> 1:37:14.600
<v Speaker 1>a Secretary of State of Georgia increased the roles by Democrats.

1:37:14.680 --> 1:37:16.280
<v Speaker 1>Like to complain about the time it took to vote

1:37:16.320 --> 1:37:18.400
<v Speaker 1>in areas with a high black population. That's part of

1:37:18.439 --> 1:37:21.639
<v Speaker 1>the suppression plan. They're not realizing that these polls are

1:37:21.800 --> 1:37:25.919
<v Speaker 1>run by local governments and those are mostly Democrat controlled

1:37:25.960 --> 1:37:30.160
<v Speaker 1>polling places. Brandon, what you are saying is true. The

1:37:30.280 --> 1:37:35.080
<v Speaker 1>long lines in some predominantly black areas of Georgia that

1:37:35.120 --> 1:37:39.960
<v Speaker 1>were cited as voter suppression efforts were Democrat controlled areas

1:37:40.479 --> 1:37:45.120
<v Speaker 1>under local Democrat control. So how that could be voter suppression?

1:37:45.640 --> 1:37:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Some will have to try and explain to me and

1:37:48.080 --> 1:37:51.040
<v Speaker 1>then also the record voter turnout. Now they would say, well,

1:37:51.040 --> 1:37:54.280
<v Speaker 1>the turnout would have been even higher. But if somebody

1:37:54.360 --> 1:37:58.200
<v Speaker 1>was trying to scheme a way to suppress the vote,

1:37:58.240 --> 1:38:01.280
<v Speaker 1>don't you think that they would at least, especially somebody

1:38:01.320 --> 1:38:03.960
<v Speaker 1>with the kind of power that Brian Kemp had, don't

1:38:04.000 --> 1:38:05.920
<v Speaker 1>you think it'd be at least successful enough that there

1:38:05.960 --> 1:38:10.439
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be record a high turnout. It's not a perfect argument,

1:38:10.439 --> 1:38:16.519
<v Speaker 1>but it's an indicator to be sure. Roger Rights heard

1:38:16.520 --> 1:38:19.320
<v Speaker 1>the show. I'll be waiting for a list. If your

1:38:19.320 --> 1:38:22.559
<v Speaker 1>friend David responds to you, keep charging buck. Thank you.

1:38:22.640 --> 1:38:26.200
<v Speaker 1>On the Israel book issue, yeah, I don't have a

1:38:26.240 --> 1:38:29.880
<v Speaker 1>great list of books on israel I really, and I

1:38:29.920 --> 1:38:31.559
<v Speaker 1>wish that I could just rattle some off the top

1:38:31.600 --> 1:38:33.160
<v Speaker 1>of my head, but I wouldn't want to give you

1:38:33.960 --> 1:38:36.040
<v Speaker 1>the first five things that pop up on Amazon. You

1:38:36.040 --> 1:38:38.120
<v Speaker 1>don't need me for that. So usually when I recommend

1:38:38.120 --> 1:38:39.920
<v Speaker 1>a book to you, one it's something that I've read,

1:38:39.960 --> 1:38:43.040
<v Speaker 1>and two it's something that I highly recommend. I don't

1:38:43.040 --> 1:38:47.800
<v Speaker 1>have one on Israeli history specifically. And actually I'm going

1:38:47.840 --> 1:38:52.400
<v Speaker 1>to be flying, you know, next week, I'm going to China.

1:38:52.600 --> 1:38:54.960
<v Speaker 1>As our president likes to say, and if any of

1:38:55.040 --> 1:38:57.439
<v Speaker 1>you have any recommendations. I need to bring hard copy

1:38:57.479 --> 1:39:00.840
<v Speaker 1>books because I don't want to bring electronic devices with

1:39:00.920 --> 1:39:05.600
<v Speaker 1>me unnecessarily to China for obvious reasons. So I'm going

1:39:05.680 --> 1:39:09.120
<v Speaker 1>to bring hard copy books. If you have a book

1:39:09.160 --> 1:39:10.880
<v Speaker 1>that you're like Buck, this is the greatest thing I've

1:39:10.880 --> 1:39:16.720
<v Speaker 1>read in a long time. Nonfiction, please nonfiction. Feel free

1:39:16.760 --> 1:39:22.559
<v Speaker 1>to send me your recommendations on Facebook. Let's see we

1:39:22.640 --> 1:39:26.800
<v Speaker 1>have Nathan who rights Hey, what's up. I've been listening

1:39:26.840 --> 1:39:29.479
<v Speaker 1>to your show since the Saturday show on the Blaze. Well, Nathan,

1:39:29.520 --> 1:39:33.960
<v Speaker 1>that means your original Saturday squad oss and the fact

1:39:34.000 --> 1:39:35.920
<v Speaker 1>that you can keep my attention almost daily through a

1:39:35.960 --> 1:39:38.599
<v Speaker 1>three hour show is a testament to your skills on

1:39:38.680 --> 1:39:41.519
<v Speaker 1>the air. This is my first time writing in but

1:39:41.560 --> 1:39:44.200
<v Speaker 1>your appeals for some good workout music have finally motivated

1:39:44.240 --> 1:39:46.599
<v Speaker 1>me to reach out. I have no idea what your

1:39:46.680 --> 1:39:48.680
<v Speaker 1>range of favorite music genres are, but as a guy

1:39:48.680 --> 1:39:50.720
<v Speaker 1>who works out three days a week and almost obsessively

1:39:50.720 --> 1:39:54.160
<v Speaker 1>works on expanding his Spotify library, I thought i'd give

1:39:54.200 --> 1:39:58.120
<v Speaker 1>you my two cents. Check out the artist Cartel, especially

1:39:58.200 --> 1:40:02.519
<v Speaker 1>their album cycles. Okay energetic but with actual music skills

1:40:02.560 --> 1:40:06.120
<v Speaker 1>on display. Thank you, Nathan. I will check out Cartels.

1:40:06.280 --> 1:40:08.080
<v Speaker 1>I think I've heard of them. I think I might

1:40:08.120 --> 1:40:09.559
<v Speaker 1>know one or two of their songs that I did

1:40:09.600 --> 1:40:11.679
<v Speaker 1>like it, So I'm willing to go back and look

1:40:11.720 --> 1:40:15.400
<v Speaker 1>at some more ps from Nathan. As a guy who

1:40:15.640 --> 1:40:19.280
<v Speaker 1>recently grew a beard, I have come to realize you

1:40:19.320 --> 1:40:21.400
<v Speaker 1>can't please everyone with what you do or do not

1:40:21.560 --> 1:40:25.320
<v Speaker 1>grow on your face. If you do, you at least

1:40:25.360 --> 1:40:27.439
<v Speaker 1>you don't look like an adolescent when you're clean shaven,

1:40:27.560 --> 1:40:32.120
<v Speaker 1>like me. Shields high, Nathan, Nathan the beard. I will

1:40:32.120 --> 1:40:37.120
<v Speaker 1>tell you I've had a few a few ladies whose

1:40:37.160 --> 1:40:41.800
<v Speaker 1>opinions I respect, who have been very pro beard, and

1:40:41.840 --> 1:40:44.559
<v Speaker 1>I think they've They've definitely tipped the balance in favor

1:40:44.760 --> 1:40:48.479
<v Speaker 1>of the beard staying for a while. Also, I like

1:40:48.600 --> 1:40:50.720
<v Speaker 1>it because it's low maintenance and I don't have to

1:40:50.720 --> 1:40:53.519
<v Speaker 1>think about shaving, which is kind of nice. And if

1:40:53.560 --> 1:40:57.120
<v Speaker 1>it gets really hot this summer, I will unleash my

1:40:57.200 --> 1:41:00.800
<v Speaker 1>bare skinned face on the world and hopefully that will

1:41:00.960 --> 1:41:04.759
<v Speaker 1>be a little bit cooler as in temperature not hip.

1:41:06.000 --> 1:41:13.719
<v Speaker 1>Let's see here, James Rights stolen hah, Hillary, you lost

1:41:13.760 --> 1:41:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Farren Square. I dislike Bernie Sanders, but Hillary stole the

1:41:17.640 --> 1:41:20.519
<v Speaker 1>election from him. The lad for trying to steal our

1:41:20.600 --> 1:41:23.240
<v Speaker 1>chosen president who won faren Square by trying to impeach

1:41:23.320 --> 1:41:26.679
<v Speaker 1>President Trump and create ways for unfair voting like early

1:41:26.760 --> 1:41:28.880
<v Speaker 1>voting on a holiday for voting allowing employees to be

1:41:28.920 --> 1:41:31.479
<v Speaker 1>able to leave for work three hours, an idea New

1:41:31.560 --> 1:41:35.240
<v Speaker 1>York that Koma wanted to do. They cry voter suppression,

1:41:35.240 --> 1:41:37.400
<v Speaker 1>and if I can remember correctly, they tried to throughout

1:41:37.600 --> 1:41:40.960
<v Speaker 1>President Trump in the trash throw out votes rather for

1:41:41.000 --> 1:41:44.559
<v Speaker 1>President Trump. The trash three words for Hillary and the

1:41:44.680 --> 1:41:50.519
<v Speaker 1>rest of them. Get over it, shields high Trump will

1:41:50.560 --> 1:41:54.519
<v Speaker 1>win again. From w g Y up in Coubleskill, New York,

1:41:54.840 --> 1:41:56.840
<v Speaker 1>or at Cobleskill, New York. I'm not sure how I

1:41:56.880 --> 1:42:00.479
<v Speaker 1>say that you should visit upstate. Visit the Bay Hall,

1:42:01.200 --> 1:42:04.320
<v Speaker 1>OH Baseball Hall of Fame in Cooperstown, New York. Were

1:42:04.320 --> 1:42:07.640
<v Speaker 1>only thirty minutes from there. Lots to do well it

1:42:07.760 --> 1:42:09.519
<v Speaker 1>just when I say Hi five and thank you to

1:42:09.600 --> 1:42:13.160
<v Speaker 1>all my wonderful folks up in the w g Y

1:42:13.280 --> 1:42:16.639
<v Speaker 1>area of upstate New York. I am a New Yorker,

1:42:16.680 --> 1:42:18.879
<v Speaker 1>as you all know, so I have a particular fondness

1:42:18.920 --> 1:42:21.439
<v Speaker 1>for anything New York related. I have never been to

1:42:21.439 --> 1:42:25.720
<v Speaker 1>the Baseball Hall of Fame. Will I will keep my

1:42:25.760 --> 1:42:28.400
<v Speaker 1>opinions about baseball to myself because I want I want

1:42:28.400 --> 1:42:30.240
<v Speaker 1>you all to still be my friend. I don't want

1:42:30.280 --> 1:42:32.840
<v Speaker 1>you to get mad at me. Thanks for writing in, James,

1:42:34.000 --> 1:42:38.880
<v Speaker 1>Pamela writes, most of the complaints you just leave it

1:42:38.920 --> 1:42:44.200
<v Speaker 1>against Biden fit Donald Trump. I'm not a Democrat, I

1:42:44.240 --> 1:42:48.400
<v Speaker 1>am not a liberal. I am never trump x goop.

1:42:48.920 --> 1:42:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Sadly too many bought the spin. Well, Pamela, I wish

1:42:54.160 --> 1:42:56.559
<v Speaker 1>you would give me a bit of the specifics of

1:42:56.600 --> 1:42:59.080
<v Speaker 1>what the complaints I leave it against Biden are when

1:42:59.080 --> 1:43:03.719
<v Speaker 1>it comes to Trump. You know, Trump isn't a career

1:43:04.200 --> 1:43:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Let's just start with this. Let's start with how Trump

1:43:06.160 --> 1:43:11.120
<v Speaker 1>and Biden are different. Trump isn't a career politician. He's

1:43:11.160 --> 1:43:14.920
<v Speaker 1>not a lifetime swamp creature. He has worked and very

1:43:14.960 --> 1:43:18.880
<v Speaker 1>successfully worked in the private sector for many decades. He's

1:43:18.880 --> 1:43:23.120
<v Speaker 1>built a globally recognizable brand. He did inherit money from

1:43:23.160 --> 1:43:25.280
<v Speaker 1>his father, but he did not inherit a global brand.

1:43:25.320 --> 1:43:30.160
<v Speaker 1>He created that. He has been a very successful media

1:43:30.240 --> 1:43:36.519
<v Speaker 1>personality in his own right. Let's see ran on a

1:43:36.600 --> 1:43:41.040
<v Speaker 1>campaign of some ideas that were his and really almost

1:43:41.160 --> 1:43:44.960
<v Speaker 1>nobody else's in the Republican field, including things like building

1:43:45.000 --> 1:43:49.839
<v Speaker 1>a wall and stopping Chinese predatory trade practices, two areas

1:43:49.840 --> 1:43:51.559
<v Speaker 1>where I would note he has been proven to be

1:43:51.800 --> 1:43:56.080
<v Speaker 1>correct and the consensus in the Republican Party has been

1:43:56.120 --> 1:44:01.920
<v Speaker 1>proven incorrect. So I what are you talking about? You

1:44:01.920 --> 1:44:05.200
<v Speaker 1>think that Trump sniffs women's hair or touches them too much.

1:44:06.040 --> 1:44:10.120
<v Speaker 1>I've never seen photos of Trump putting his hand in

1:44:10.200 --> 1:44:12.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of weird places with young women in public. I've

1:44:13.000 --> 1:44:15.880
<v Speaker 1>never seen that. I know there are accusations from some

1:44:15.920 --> 1:44:19.160
<v Speaker 1>women against President Trump that he is, that he was

1:44:19.439 --> 1:44:22.760
<v Speaker 1>sexually aggressive with them. How much you believe them or not,

1:44:22.840 --> 1:44:26.400
<v Speaker 1>I leave up to you, But there's not the same

1:44:28.280 --> 1:44:32.439
<v Speaker 1>clear evidence of a weird, creepy behavior. While I remember,

1:44:32.439 --> 1:44:34.719
<v Speaker 1>while also an elected public official with a lot of power.

1:44:35.920 --> 1:44:38.880
<v Speaker 1>So I need you to tell me what the complaints

1:44:38.920 --> 1:44:42.000
<v Speaker 1>are against Biden. Then also fit Trump that he's that

1:44:42.160 --> 1:44:45.400
<v Speaker 1>he says whatever to make anybody like him at any

1:44:45.400 --> 1:44:47.040
<v Speaker 1>point in time. I mean, Trump says things that make

1:44:47.160 --> 1:44:48.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people hate him. He said things that

1:44:48.880 --> 1:44:50.599
<v Speaker 1>make a lot of the goop hate him. He said

1:44:50.600 --> 1:44:54.479
<v Speaker 1>things that created what is the never Trump movement that

1:44:54.560 --> 1:44:56.879
<v Speaker 1>continues to this day. I don't think he says whatever

1:44:56.920 --> 1:44:59.840
<v Speaker 1>people will want to hear. Yeah, his supporters will want

1:44:59.880 --> 1:45:05.080
<v Speaker 1>to hear it, but his supporters were not the Republican

1:45:05.120 --> 1:45:07.200
<v Speaker 1>mainstream when he started it. So I don't think it's

1:45:07.240 --> 1:45:10.320
<v Speaker 1>fair to say that he was pandering to the GOP.

1:45:10.560 --> 1:45:11.960
<v Speaker 1>Quite the opposite. I think he was kind of a

1:45:12.000 --> 1:45:14.960
<v Speaker 1>punch in the face to the GOP. But as you

1:45:14.960 --> 1:45:17.200
<v Speaker 1>can see, Pamela, you got me thinking with your question,

1:45:17.360 --> 1:45:22.280
<v Speaker 1>so I appreciate you sending it to me. Friday's quote

1:45:22.280 --> 1:45:24.599
<v Speaker 1>this is from Adam was the late Alan Rickman as

1:45:24.680 --> 1:45:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Hans Gruber to THEO. I think you should add that

1:45:28.120 --> 1:45:30.960
<v Speaker 1>quote to your list intro for the show Shields High

1:45:31.479 --> 1:45:35.160
<v Speaker 1>THEO you wanted a miracle? I give you the f B.

1:45:35.840 --> 1:45:41.519
<v Speaker 1>I did I sound like Rahem Kassam there. Raheim has

1:45:41.560 --> 1:45:45.719
<v Speaker 1>such a such a fancy accent. It's a huge, huge advantage.

1:45:45.720 --> 1:45:48.439
<v Speaker 1>We can't put too much Raheem on the radio because

1:45:48.479 --> 1:45:50.439
<v Speaker 1>of his fancy British accent. I don't want you guys

1:45:50.439 --> 1:45:52.679
<v Speaker 1>to say, Buck, you need a fancy British accent too,

1:45:53.960 --> 1:45:57.840
<v Speaker 1>speak of Raheim. Rain writes in I love Raheim's guest

1:45:57.880 --> 1:46:01.120
<v Speaker 1>hosting when he sat in for you, great great guest host.

1:46:01.240 --> 1:46:03.479
<v Speaker 1>Brexit and UK goings on are important for us to

1:46:03.479 --> 1:46:09.000
<v Speaker 1>hear about. Maybe interview Sargon of Akad. You might like

1:46:09.040 --> 1:46:11.240
<v Speaker 1>to chat with him about classical liberalism versus what the

1:46:11.320 --> 1:46:16.960
<v Speaker 1>left calls it. Now. I don't know who Sargon is,

1:46:18.000 --> 1:46:20.400
<v Speaker 1>so I'd have to figure this out. Is that a

1:46:20.439 --> 1:46:24.240
<v Speaker 1>real Is there a person named Sargon of Akad? I

1:46:24.400 --> 1:46:27.800
<v Speaker 1>learned something new every day. When someone asks you if

1:46:27.800 --> 1:46:31.840
<v Speaker 1>you're a god, you say yes. Matt writes, Hey, Buck,

1:46:31.880 --> 1:46:33.640
<v Speaker 1>I lost track for you in your radio shows when

1:46:33.680 --> 1:46:36.840
<v Speaker 1>you change networks back around twenty sixteen, I've been busy

1:46:36.840 --> 1:46:38.840
<v Speaker 1>building a new family ranch, kind of got it rolling.

1:46:38.880 --> 1:46:40.519
<v Speaker 1>Just thought i'd touch base, see how things are going,

1:46:40.600 --> 1:46:43.439
<v Speaker 1>see if you're still on the radio, what network and

1:46:43.479 --> 1:46:45.800
<v Speaker 1>all that. I'm not sure if you remember. I was

1:46:45.840 --> 1:46:47.840
<v Speaker 1>listening from your Days and the Freedom Hut at the Blaze.

1:46:47.880 --> 1:46:50.080
<v Speaker 1>We've chatted before. I called your show a couple of times.

1:46:50.120 --> 1:46:54.439
<v Speaker 1>Hope Ball as well, Matt in Texas. There we go,

1:46:54.560 --> 1:46:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Matt Man, Well you got through me on Facebook, and yeah,

1:46:57.200 --> 1:46:58.720
<v Speaker 1>you can listen to the show anytime. I mean, I'm

1:46:58.760 --> 1:47:03.519
<v Speaker 1>on about one hundred and twenty plus stations across the country.

1:47:03.920 --> 1:47:08.840
<v Speaker 1>You can listen on the iHeartRadio app. So yeah, um,

1:47:08.880 --> 1:47:11.000
<v Speaker 1>I think I think you should definitely listen my friend,

1:47:11.080 --> 1:47:13.480
<v Speaker 1>or you can just listen on the iTunes on iTunes podcast.

1:47:14.000 --> 1:47:15.240
<v Speaker 1>That's where a lot of a lot of the cool

1:47:15.320 --> 1:47:20.840
<v Speaker 1>kids listen these days on the podcast. Yeah so, uh, Matt,

1:47:20.840 --> 1:47:23.080
<v Speaker 1>good to have you back. Matt original Saturday Squad people

1:47:23.080 --> 1:47:26.840
<v Speaker 1>that have been been with me from OSS days. That's

1:47:26.880 --> 1:47:31.439
<v Speaker 1>like seven years now. It's a long time, a long time,

1:47:32.080 --> 1:47:34.360
<v Speaker 1>all right, team, Speaking of seven years, more coming up

1:47:34.400 --> 1:47:35.760
<v Speaker 1>tomorrow she'll tie