WEBVTT - Bloomberg Surveillance TV: April 14th, 2026

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News.

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:15.440
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Jonathan Ferrow, along

0:00:15.480 --> 0:00:18.680
<v Speaker 2>with Lisa Bromwitz and Amrie Hordernt. Join us each day

0:00:18.720 --> 0:00:22.280
<v Speaker 2>for insight from the best in markets, economics, and geopolitics

0:00:22.400 --> 0:00:24.880
<v Speaker 2>from our global headquarters in New York City. We are

0:00:24.920 --> 0:00:27.680
<v Speaker 2>live on Bloomberg Television weekday mornings from six to nine

0:00:27.720 --> 0:00:31.280
<v Speaker 2>am Eastern. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify or

0:00:31.320 --> 0:00:33.919
<v Speaker 2>anywhere else you listen, and as always on the Bloomberg

0:00:34.000 --> 0:00:37.280
<v Speaker 2>Terminal and the Bloomberg Business app. So here's the latest

0:00:37.280 --> 0:00:39.640
<v Speaker 2>this morning. The US of Iran wearing a fresh round

0:00:39.680 --> 0:00:42.479
<v Speaker 2>of talks before the ceasefire ends next week, joining us

0:00:42.479 --> 0:00:44.760
<v Speaker 2>now as Rachel's ZEMBA of the Center for a New

0:00:45.000 --> 0:00:48.240
<v Speaker 2>American Security. Rachel, Welcome to the program. Anne, Marie and

0:00:48.320 --> 0:00:50.760
<v Speaker 2>Victoria coaches. We're talking about this in the previous hour.

0:00:51.000 --> 0:00:54.120
<v Speaker 2>The American strategy has changed. They've gone from lifting some

0:00:54.280 --> 0:00:59.800
<v Speaker 2>sanctions on some Iranian crude to ultimately blockading all Iranian crude.

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:01.560
<v Speaker 2>What do you expect to be the outcome of this

0:01:01.640 --> 0:01:02.600
<v Speaker 2>shift in strategy?

0:01:04.160 --> 0:01:06.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well, the US government. Thanks for having me, John.

0:01:07.640 --> 0:01:12.000
<v Speaker 3>The US government is really hoping that this blockade will

0:01:12.000 --> 0:01:14.600
<v Speaker 3>bring Iran to the not only back to the table,

0:01:14.680 --> 0:01:18.440
<v Speaker 3>but make more concessions. I would note that the Iranian

0:01:18.520 --> 0:01:23.000
<v Speaker 3>response to the US twenty year moratorium has been to

0:01:23.040 --> 0:01:26.240
<v Speaker 3>come back with another five year one, which I think

0:01:26.440 --> 0:01:29.119
<v Speaker 3>is similar to what they were offering back in February

0:01:29.160 --> 0:01:33.120
<v Speaker 3>before this war. So we'll see how much movement we've seen.

0:01:33.480 --> 0:01:38.360
<v Speaker 3>But ultimately, what this means is that oil flows, is

0:01:38.680 --> 0:01:43.200
<v Speaker 3>that the oil flows from Iran, if this blockade is effective,

0:01:44.040 --> 0:01:48.360
<v Speaker 3>could could fall. That could be two million barrels a

0:01:48.440 --> 0:01:53.240
<v Speaker 3>day further offline that was going to China, you know,

0:01:53.320 --> 0:01:57.240
<v Speaker 3>putting you know, taking you know, outages from the Gulf

0:01:57.920 --> 0:02:01.920
<v Speaker 3>from ten to eleven million barrels a day to maybe

0:02:02.280 --> 0:02:06.240
<v Speaker 3>thirteen or so. So it would just increase the outage

0:02:06.280 --> 0:02:09.240
<v Speaker 3>that we're seeing here. But the US government is hoping

0:02:09.320 --> 0:02:14.880
<v Speaker 3>that we get to a resolution. But right now we're

0:02:14.960 --> 0:02:18.800
<v Speaker 3>sort of we're seeing a few sanctioned vessels making their

0:02:18.800 --> 0:02:22.040
<v Speaker 3>way through the strait. Will they be stopped by US

0:02:22.040 --> 0:02:24.920
<v Speaker 3>military when they get further out into the Gulf of Oman,

0:02:25.400 --> 0:02:27.000
<v Speaker 3>We'll see. I think that will be one of the

0:02:27.040 --> 0:02:29.200
<v Speaker 3>stories for today in the next few days.

0:02:29.360 --> 0:02:32.720
<v Speaker 1>Rachel speaking of that blockade. If the United States does

0:02:33.040 --> 0:02:35.840
<v Speaker 1>take over a tanker, is it clear to where exactly

0:02:35.880 --> 0:02:36.560
<v Speaker 1>they would bring it.

0:02:38.280 --> 0:02:44.000
<v Speaker 3>No, it's not. You know, we were in in charted territory.

0:02:44.080 --> 0:02:47.400
<v Speaker 3>There was a point earlier this year, before the war

0:02:48.160 --> 0:02:50.240
<v Speaker 3>where the US was I mean I called it at

0:02:50.240 --> 0:02:53.480
<v Speaker 3>the time, they were using you know, kinetic force to

0:02:53.520 --> 0:02:57.720
<v Speaker 3>implement financial sanctions. They did it with Venezuela a little

0:02:57.720 --> 0:03:01.440
<v Speaker 3>bit with the tankers going to Cuba, couple Iranian tankers,

0:03:01.680 --> 0:03:03.840
<v Speaker 3>but a lot of them just sort of spent time

0:03:03.960 --> 0:03:07.640
<v Speaker 3>out at sea. Some of the Venezuelan ones eventually came

0:03:07.680 --> 0:03:11.280
<v Speaker 3>to the United States or went to Caribbean ports. It's

0:03:11.400 --> 0:03:16.480
<v Speaker 3>possible some of these could go to Aman, could go

0:03:16.560 --> 0:03:20.440
<v Speaker 3>somewhere else and get processed, could go to friendly countries

0:03:20.480 --> 0:03:24.560
<v Speaker 3>in Asia. But it's not clear to me that Scentcom

0:03:24.639 --> 0:03:28.840
<v Speaker 3>has been charged to stop these vessels. It's not clear

0:03:28.880 --> 0:03:31.160
<v Speaker 3>that they have a guidance about what to do with

0:03:31.200 --> 0:03:34.280
<v Speaker 3>them after the fact. This is really a point of

0:03:34.440 --> 0:03:38.040
<v Speaker 3>leverage that the US government is trying to impose on

0:03:38.080 --> 0:03:41.880
<v Speaker 3>both Iran and China. Right China has been the buyer

0:03:42.560 --> 0:03:45.400
<v Speaker 3>of first and last resort for Iran. It's also been

0:03:45.440 --> 0:03:49.320
<v Speaker 3>the primary buyer of the Russia sanctions. And I know

0:03:49.440 --> 0:03:52.360
<v Speaker 3>it as well that the US government let you I'm

0:03:52.360 --> 0:03:55.640
<v Speaker 3>sure I've talked about this, but have let the Russia

0:03:55.680 --> 0:04:02.040
<v Speaker 3>sanctions lapse within the last couple of days, largely because

0:04:02.960 --> 0:04:05.680
<v Speaker 3>China was the one who was still buying most of

0:04:05.680 --> 0:04:07.000
<v Speaker 3>that oil.

0:04:06.880 --> 0:04:10.440
<v Speaker 1>In order for the Iranians maybe capitulate for the United States.

0:04:10.520 --> 0:04:12.720
<v Speaker 1>Does the blockade need to go on for longer? Because

0:04:12.760 --> 0:04:15.440
<v Speaker 1>before the blockade, and we were just discussing the sanction

0:04:15.560 --> 0:04:18.479
<v Speaker 1>lift on Iranian crewed at sea, the regime brought in

0:04:18.800 --> 0:04:21.760
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of millions of dollars because they were allowed to

0:04:21.920 --> 0:04:26.240
<v Speaker 1>now export without the sanctions, so out of much higher premium.

0:04:27.880 --> 0:04:31.640
<v Speaker 3>You're spot on, Anne, Marie. Iran has been earning more

0:04:31.960 --> 0:04:35.040
<v Speaker 3>in the last couple of months. They got more vessels

0:04:35.440 --> 0:04:39.200
<v Speaker 3>out ahead of the war compared to what they were

0:04:39.240 --> 0:04:43.200
<v Speaker 3>normally doing. It's pretty volatile oil flows out of Iran,

0:04:43.279 --> 0:04:46.960
<v Speaker 3>I must admit, and they've been able to sell at

0:04:47.040 --> 0:04:51.960
<v Speaker 3>much higher prices now. The sanctions relief that well hasn't

0:04:52.040 --> 0:04:55.840
<v Speaker 3>yet expired, but has been converted into this military blockade,

0:04:56.400 --> 0:04:59.080
<v Speaker 3>did not lift any of the sanctions on what Iran

0:04:59.120 --> 0:05:02.880
<v Speaker 3>could buy, how they could spend there their resources. That's

0:05:03.080 --> 0:05:04.839
<v Speaker 3>one of the reasons they want to be paid in

0:05:04.880 --> 0:05:08.440
<v Speaker 3>crypto or Redmond b or assets that don't touch the

0:05:08.800 --> 0:05:14.360
<v Speaker 3>US treasury. But undeniably, you know, Iran's military led government

0:05:15.040 --> 0:05:19.040
<v Speaker 3>has been able to support itself, and you know it's

0:05:19.080 --> 0:05:22.320
<v Speaker 3>sitting on more cash now even as more cash is

0:05:22.360 --> 0:05:24.719
<v Speaker 3>locked up. Now, that's not going to be enough for

0:05:24.839 --> 0:05:28.400
<v Speaker 3>rebuilding Iran, but it could be enough for the regime

0:05:28.480 --> 0:05:31.600
<v Speaker 3>to remain in place. And so I think that's where

0:05:31.839 --> 0:05:34.400
<v Speaker 3>the US government's view that this could be just a

0:05:34.440 --> 0:05:37.760
<v Speaker 3>couple more weeks of pain. The timelines might not line

0:05:37.800 --> 0:05:38.760
<v Speaker 3>up in my view.

0:05:38.960 --> 0:05:42.400
<v Speaker 2>Stay with us. More Bloomberg surveillance coming up after this,

0:05:51.760 --> 0:05:54.160
<v Speaker 2>we understand this morning. According to headlines, the fronts of

0:05:54.200 --> 0:05:56.320
<v Speaker 2>the UK is co hosting a summit this weekend to

0:05:56.320 --> 0:05:59.599
<v Speaker 2>discuss safeguarding international shipping. I'm very pleased to say we

0:05:59.600 --> 0:06:01.920
<v Speaker 2>can have that conversation right now around this table because

0:06:01.960 --> 0:06:04.360
<v Speaker 2>joining us is roll on the skill. The French Minister

0:06:04.440 --> 0:06:06.840
<v Speaker 2>for the Economy and Finance Minister, good morning, it's good

0:06:06.839 --> 0:06:08.919
<v Speaker 2>to see you. Good morning, Thank you for having welcome

0:06:08.960 --> 0:06:11.400
<v Speaker 2>to New York City. Let's talk about the objectives for

0:06:11.480 --> 0:06:14.360
<v Speaker 2>this meeting. What can we hope for over the next week.

0:06:15.360 --> 0:06:17.719
<v Speaker 4>Well, we can hope for the escalation. I mean, you

0:06:17.920 --> 0:06:20.440
<v Speaker 4>know that France wasn't part of the conflict, as we're

0:06:20.440 --> 0:06:22.400
<v Speaker 4>not a belligerent, we're not even warned that it was

0:06:22.440 --> 0:06:24.680
<v Speaker 4>going to happen. But now we are where we are

0:06:25.120 --> 0:06:27.960
<v Speaker 4>and we feel with others, the UK and others, we

0:06:28.000 --> 0:06:31.600
<v Speaker 4>can be part of the solution. We need the escalation first,

0:06:31.640 --> 0:06:34.279
<v Speaker 4>we need those talks that are happening and which hopefully

0:06:34.279 --> 0:06:36.240
<v Speaker 4>we'll keep on happening between a Run and the US

0:06:36.320 --> 0:06:40.160
<v Speaker 4>to move towards some kind of solution. But if we

0:06:40.160 --> 0:06:43.200
<v Speaker 4>do have the escalation, we feel that a coalition of

0:06:43.240 --> 0:06:45.920
<v Speaker 4>the winning countries from all over the place that have

0:06:46.320 --> 0:06:49.360
<v Speaker 4>a part in the problem, because as you know, this

0:06:50.080 --> 0:06:52.919
<v Speaker 4>straight over most story is affecting a soul economically in

0:06:52.960 --> 0:06:56.040
<v Speaker 4>Asia dramatically and in Europe as well, that we can

0:06:56.240 --> 0:07:01.760
<v Speaker 4>help pacify the strait. That straight is the notot of

0:07:01.800 --> 0:07:04.640
<v Speaker 4>the economic impact of that conflict. If we can undo

0:07:04.720 --> 0:07:06.680
<v Speaker 4>that not we know that we don't be in a

0:07:06.720 --> 0:07:10.920
<v Speaker 4>better place. So whatever we can do once that's the

0:07:11.000 --> 0:07:14.960
<v Speaker 4>escalation that's important to help make the straight up our

0:07:15.000 --> 0:07:17.480
<v Speaker 4>moves more freed. We will do and that's what's happening

0:07:17.520 --> 0:07:17.880
<v Speaker 4>on Friday.

0:07:18.000 --> 0:07:21.040
<v Speaker 2>Does that actually mean in reality whatever we can do,

0:07:21.040 --> 0:07:23.280
<v Speaker 2>does that mean you'd have a military presence in the

0:07:23.280 --> 0:07:23.640
<v Speaker 2>straight up?

0:07:23.640 --> 0:07:23.920
<v Speaker 4>Foremost?

0:07:23.960 --> 0:07:24.680
<v Speaker 2>What does that actually mean?

0:07:25.280 --> 0:07:27.360
<v Speaker 4>What's happening in the Red Sea? And it has happened

0:07:27.360 --> 0:07:29.320
<v Speaker 4>for a while. You know, there was hooties there that

0:07:29.400 --> 0:07:33.920
<v Speaker 4>were making passage dangerous for ships, and we have, we

0:07:34.000 --> 0:07:37.600
<v Speaker 4>had and we still have coalition of partners that are

0:07:37.680 --> 0:07:42.960
<v Speaker 4>just making it safe, just preventing deterring attacks from the hooties.

0:07:43.040 --> 0:07:45.640
<v Speaker 4>And you know we are in there. There's Spanish in there,

0:07:45.680 --> 0:07:48.640
<v Speaker 4>and there's a few countries in there. Obviously the straight

0:07:48.720 --> 0:07:51.880
<v Speaker 4>up our moose would be probably a bigger deal to do,

0:07:52.120 --> 0:07:55.080
<v Speaker 4>but we can do it provided again that we have

0:07:55.120 --> 0:07:58.680
<v Speaker 4>the escalation, we have some path to lasting seas fire

0:07:59.240 --> 0:08:03.320
<v Speaker 4>that will require I mador headway on nuclear on ballistic

0:08:03.360 --> 0:08:06.640
<v Speaker 4>capabilities of Iran that have to be gone. But once

0:08:06.680 --> 0:08:10.720
<v Speaker 4>we have that, there's a case for non beligerent country

0:08:10.760 --> 0:08:12.960
<v Speaker 4>to be part of the solution to pacify the stretch,

0:08:12.960 --> 0:08:15.120
<v Speaker 4>which again is the not of the economic impact.

0:08:15.160 --> 0:08:17.320
<v Speaker 2>We have to talk about consequences as well. I'm not

0:08:17.320 --> 0:08:21.040
<v Speaker 2>sure how well understood the energy mixed story is in France.

0:08:21.080 --> 0:08:23.000
<v Speaker 2>At the European level, it's been a bit of a

0:08:23.040 --> 0:08:25.840
<v Speaker 2>mess in places like Germany, particularly the UK that's been

0:08:25.880 --> 0:08:28.880
<v Speaker 2>highlighted so many times. Could you briefly describe the energy

0:08:28.920 --> 0:08:31.920
<v Speaker 2>mix in France, how different it is and how insulated

0:08:32.080 --> 0:08:32.480
<v Speaker 2>you might be.

0:08:32.880 --> 0:08:35.440
<v Speaker 4>You know, I remember Ram Manuel when Barack Obama came

0:08:35.480 --> 0:08:37.520
<v Speaker 4>into office, that said you should never let a good

0:08:37.559 --> 0:08:40.680
<v Speaker 4>economic crisis go to waste. Well, this is what Frans

0:08:40.720 --> 0:08:43.280
<v Speaker 4>did in the seventies when we had an old shot.

0:08:43.320 --> 0:08:46.880
<v Speaker 4>Then France decided to embark on a major nuclear program

0:08:47.200 --> 0:08:50.280
<v Speaker 4>that allowed us to go down from ninety percent hydro

0:08:50.360 --> 0:08:55.000
<v Speaker 4>camber you know, energy mix to sixty, so forty percent

0:08:55.000 --> 0:08:57.880
<v Speaker 4>of our energy now it's coming from nuclear, it's carbon free,

0:08:57.920 --> 0:09:01.600
<v Speaker 4>it's cheap, and it's completely sovereign. It doesn't depend on

0:09:01.600 --> 0:09:05.240
<v Speaker 4>anyone else. And because we don't want these economic crisis

0:09:05.280 --> 0:09:07.720
<v Speaker 4>good to ways, we've just announced that we're doubling down.

0:09:07.800 --> 0:09:10.680
<v Speaker 4>So we're going to bring that energy mix from ninety

0:09:10.720 --> 0:09:14.440
<v Speaker 4>to sixty to thirty five by investing again in nuclear

0:09:14.760 --> 0:09:18.000
<v Speaker 4>as well as hydro as well as renewables. At the

0:09:18.120 --> 0:09:20.440
<v Speaker 4>end of the day, we have a convengen star of

0:09:20.600 --> 0:09:25.559
<v Speaker 4>three major driving forces that we haven't interested in investing

0:09:25.880 --> 0:09:28.720
<v Speaker 4>geopolitical issues. We have to be sovereign, We have to

0:09:28.720 --> 0:09:33.920
<v Speaker 4>be more independent of what's happening againstwhere the environment. You know,

0:09:34.040 --> 0:09:37.040
<v Speaker 4>I think climate is coming back because it's been on

0:09:37.080 --> 0:09:39.520
<v Speaker 4>a bit of a back burner for a while, but

0:09:39.640 --> 0:09:42.240
<v Speaker 4>because we see we're depending way too much of one

0:09:42.280 --> 0:09:44.760
<v Speaker 4>region of the Gulf and of hydro camebra, it's coming back.

0:09:45.080 --> 0:09:48.000
<v Speaker 4>But also jobs. By doing this, we're going to create

0:09:48.240 --> 0:09:51.520
<v Speaker 4>hundreds of thousands of jobs because building a little barre station,

0:09:52.240 --> 0:09:55.360
<v Speaker 4>you know, building wind farms and solo farms are helpful

0:09:55.520 --> 0:09:56.559
<v Speaker 4>for the jobs on the ground.

0:09:56.840 --> 0:10:00.160
<v Speaker 5>This is all expensive and it takes money to time

0:10:00.360 --> 0:10:03.199
<v Speaker 5>where the amount of debt globally has reached record highs

0:10:03.240 --> 0:10:06.400
<v Speaker 5>has surged dramatically since the pandemic. How much fiscal headroom

0:10:06.440 --> 0:10:07.880
<v Speaker 5>do you have, Well.

0:10:07.679 --> 0:10:10.160
<v Speaker 4>It's all going to be about priorities. You know, we

0:10:10.200 --> 0:10:13.120
<v Speaker 4>can't have it all. And today we have one priority,

0:10:13.160 --> 0:10:17.440
<v Speaker 4>which is seigny, which has two pinness, defense sovereignty. We

0:10:17.520 --> 0:10:21.360
<v Speaker 4>will have doubled defense spending in France between twenty seventeen

0:10:21.559 --> 0:10:24.079
<v Speaker 4>and twenty twenty seven. By the time we get there

0:10:24.160 --> 0:10:27.240
<v Speaker 4>next year, an energy seventy so that means we have

0:10:27.280 --> 0:10:29.120
<v Speaker 4>to save and swhere. You know, we have to save

0:10:29.160 --> 0:10:31.680
<v Speaker 4>on our spending. We have to seven and retirement spending,

0:10:32.080 --> 0:10:34.640
<v Speaker 4>and you know, it's a big debate in France. We've

0:10:34.679 --> 0:10:37.600
<v Speaker 4>done so, We've managed to get a budget through and

0:10:37.600 --> 0:10:42.120
<v Speaker 4>I can tell you it wasn't easy with Congress that looks,

0:10:42.160 --> 0:10:44.880
<v Speaker 4>you know, as I said to my Italian colleague, a

0:10:44.920 --> 0:10:48.400
<v Speaker 4>bit like an Italian Congress, you know, lots of different

0:10:48.400 --> 0:10:51.040
<v Speaker 4>groups having to discuss and model through. But we did

0:10:51.559 --> 0:10:53.520
<v Speaker 4>and we're going to have to do it again. But

0:10:53.840 --> 0:10:56.920
<v Speaker 4>most importantly, I think that's a presidential election taking place

0:10:57.000 --> 0:10:59.640
<v Speaker 4>next year and the condidates are going to have to

0:10:59.679 --> 0:11:04.120
<v Speaker 4>make that choice. Two they one priority on soverignty, defense

0:11:04.120 --> 0:11:07.160
<v Speaker 4>and electricity and energy to make France and at the

0:11:07.280 --> 0:11:09.680
<v Speaker 4>end of the day, Europe a stronger place. Do we

0:11:09.720 --> 0:11:13.280
<v Speaker 4>still want to be stuck in the past of things

0:11:13.280 --> 0:11:14.480
<v Speaker 4>we have to change and reform.

0:11:14.600 --> 0:11:16.520
<v Speaker 5>Do you expect growth to have to go down because

0:11:16.520 --> 0:11:19.360
<v Speaker 5>you're saving in these other areas to preserve the sovereignty

0:11:19.800 --> 0:11:22.480
<v Speaker 5>in respect with respect to energy, with respect to defense.

0:11:22.600 --> 0:11:26.000
<v Speaker 4>Well, we entered that crisis on quite strong footing. I

0:11:26.000 --> 0:11:28.720
<v Speaker 4>heard Jimmy Diamond saying that the US academy is resilient.

0:11:28.800 --> 0:11:31.760
<v Speaker 4>So it's the French economy. It was pretty strong getting

0:11:31.760 --> 0:11:33.760
<v Speaker 4>into that crisis. So we we have a slow down

0:11:33.800 --> 0:11:37.200
<v Speaker 4>in the short run, but again what we're doing is investment.

0:11:37.679 --> 0:11:40.680
<v Speaker 4>At the moment, when someone wants to put a data

0:11:40.720 --> 0:11:44.800
<v Speaker 4>center somewhere not in the US, they look at France

0:11:45.080 --> 0:11:50.320
<v Speaker 4>because we have carbon free ample and cheap electricity and

0:11:50.360 --> 0:11:52.439
<v Speaker 4>they need that. So at the end of the day,

0:11:52.480 --> 0:11:55.400
<v Speaker 4>this is investment in the French economy, in the europe

0:11:55.400 --> 0:11:58.400
<v Speaker 4>and economy, but it is attracting investments, including from the

0:11:58.440 --> 0:12:01.920
<v Speaker 4>part of US investors. We want to diversify. We're having

0:12:02.320 --> 0:12:04.920
<v Speaker 4>you know, the Magnificent Seven looking at Frants to invest.

0:12:05.160 --> 0:12:08.439
<v Speaker 4>We're having US banks looking to invest, and we have

0:12:08.559 --> 0:12:10.880
<v Speaker 4>French and European companies also looking to invest.

0:12:10.880 --> 0:12:11.000
<v Speaker 2>THO.

0:12:11.559 --> 0:12:14.760
<v Speaker 4>Again, short term resilience, but a bit of a risk.

0:12:15.160 --> 0:12:17.040
<v Speaker 4>Long term, we need to invest in the future and

0:12:17.080 --> 0:12:19.319
<v Speaker 4>that's the only ad. Growth is the way ad.

0:12:19.480 --> 0:12:21.560
<v Speaker 1>When you look at the long term, when will France

0:12:21.679 --> 0:12:24.920
<v Speaker 1>finally stop buying Russian fossil fuels, Well, you.

0:12:24.880 --> 0:12:27.680
<v Speaker 4>Know we're committed to that. We already committed to stopping

0:12:27.880 --> 0:12:31.200
<v Speaker 4>gas import. There's no new contracts. This has been decided

0:12:31.200 --> 0:12:34.240
<v Speaker 4>that the open avount this year and any gas impot

0:12:34.280 --> 0:12:36.520
<v Speaker 4>is going to be stopped by January. So we are

0:12:36.559 --> 0:12:38.480
<v Speaker 4>on the past. The only thing we wanted to do

0:12:39.240 --> 0:12:44.720
<v Speaker 4>is to make sure that this was done respecting international laws.

0:12:44.920 --> 0:12:47.600
<v Speaker 4>We are a low binding country and EU is a

0:12:47.600 --> 0:12:50.680
<v Speaker 4>low binding country, so we did it respecting some contracts

0:12:50.679 --> 0:12:53.800
<v Speaker 4>that we're still in the go, respecting European decisions, the

0:12:53.880 --> 0:12:56.600
<v Speaker 4>sanctions decision as well, and this is all taking place

0:12:56.840 --> 0:12:59.600
<v Speaker 4>the way it should be, respecting international law.

0:13:00.160 --> 0:13:03.439
<v Speaker 2>Russia doesn't a final question an important one. You've used

0:13:03.440 --> 0:13:06.800
<v Speaker 2>the word perlligerans to describe others. The US might be

0:13:06.840 --> 0:13:09.000
<v Speaker 2>in that group in your mind. You can confirm that

0:13:09.120 --> 0:13:11.480
<v Speaker 2>if you want to. The other question, and the other

0:13:11.520 --> 0:13:14.800
<v Speaker 2>answer you've offered is the word solvereign. This is important

0:13:14.840 --> 0:13:17.120
<v Speaker 2>with regards to the future of a relationship with the US.

0:13:17.160 --> 0:13:20.160
<v Speaker 2>Just what is the transatlantic relationship given the way the

0:13:20.200 --> 0:13:22.520
<v Speaker 2>discourse has evolved over the last month.

0:13:23.600 --> 0:13:27.320
<v Speaker 4>We've been friends for two hundred and fifty years, you know,

0:13:27.480 --> 0:13:31.080
<v Speaker 4>and this is going to go beyond the ups and downs,

0:13:31.160 --> 0:13:35.319
<v Speaker 4>and there are some of the somewhat interpersonal relationship or

0:13:35.360 --> 0:13:38.520
<v Speaker 4>some somewhat disagreement on the short term way of dealing

0:13:38.520 --> 0:13:42.560
<v Speaker 4>with such and such problem. What gets us together. It's

0:13:42.640 --> 0:13:45.000
<v Speaker 4>much stronger than what divides us. And I can see

0:13:45.000 --> 0:13:48.000
<v Speaker 4>it every day when I talk to us and French

0:13:48.040 --> 0:13:50.880
<v Speaker 4>and Europen companies. We need those companies to keep on

0:13:50.960 --> 0:13:53.640
<v Speaker 4>working together to give us the right example of what

0:13:53.679 --> 0:13:56.000
<v Speaker 4>we need to do when we disagree. I'm going to

0:13:56.080 --> 0:13:58.240
<v Speaker 4>chair a G seven meeting this week. Sometimes we don't

0:13:58.280 --> 0:14:01.240
<v Speaker 4>agree on everything with our finance colleagues. We address it.

0:14:01.480 --> 0:14:04.880
<v Speaker 4>We address it in close rooms. We are allies and friends,

0:14:05.040 --> 0:14:08.040
<v Speaker 4>and this needs to go beyond what's going on in

0:14:08.040 --> 0:14:11.840
<v Speaker 4>the ground. We have the solutions to the problem together

0:14:12.360 --> 0:14:15.720
<v Speaker 4>and we need to make sure that everyone understands this.

0:14:16.520 --> 0:14:21.400
<v Speaker 4>We are stronger together than divided. Despite sometimes the somewhat

0:14:21.640 --> 0:14:23.840
<v Speaker 4>short term disagreement. We need to look beyond that and

0:14:23.880 --> 0:14:24.440
<v Speaker 4>make sure.

0:14:24.240 --> 0:14:27.800
<v Speaker 2>We do stay with us. More Bloomberg surveillance coming up

0:14:28.120 --> 0:14:40.040
<v Speaker 2>after this. Let's talk about the shaken and the commodity market,

0:14:40.120 --> 0:14:42.800
<v Speaker 2>and not include go snapping a two day losing stream

0:14:42.840 --> 0:14:45.680
<v Speaker 2>with inflation concerns easing on, renewed optimism for a peace

0:14:45.760 --> 0:14:48.520
<v Speaker 2>deal with the ram Amy G. Morgan Stanley right, The

0:14:48.560 --> 0:14:50.720
<v Speaker 2>longer term effects of current events in the Middle East,

0:14:50.720 --> 0:14:53.640
<v Speaker 2>the more bullish than bearish for metals if they bring

0:14:53.760 --> 0:14:56.120
<v Speaker 2>more stock pilot. Amy joins us now for more Amy,

0:14:56.120 --> 0:14:58.400
<v Speaker 2>good Mornich, and welcome to New York as well. Let's

0:14:58.400 --> 0:15:00.760
<v Speaker 2>talk about the degree of disruption you've seen in your

0:15:00.760 --> 0:15:03.560
<v Speaker 2>space over the last six weeks. How things changed.

0:15:04.000 --> 0:15:06.720
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, so, look, the big change we've seen is really

0:15:06.760 --> 0:15:09.880
<v Speaker 6>the aluminium market. This has been the most physically disrupted

0:15:09.920 --> 0:15:12.320
<v Speaker 6>from the conflict so far. First of all, it was

0:15:12.360 --> 0:15:14.760
<v Speaker 6>a question of we couldn't ship anything out. The region

0:15:14.880 --> 0:15:17.600
<v Speaker 6>is about nine percent of global aluminium production. Then we

0:15:17.640 --> 0:15:20.680
<v Speaker 6>started worrying about getting those raw materials into the aluminum

0:15:20.760 --> 0:15:22.960
<v Speaker 6>box site, and then we actually had some strikes on

0:15:23.080 --> 0:15:26.280
<v Speaker 6>facilities and on energy infrastructure, and so we've lost about

0:15:26.400 --> 0:15:29.200
<v Speaker 6>four percent of global aluminium production. And bear in mind

0:15:29.240 --> 0:15:32.240
<v Speaker 6>and commodities, we care about those very small imbalances. It's

0:15:32.240 --> 0:15:34.880
<v Speaker 6>the price is set at the margin. So aluminium has

0:15:34.920 --> 0:15:37.280
<v Speaker 6>been one of the standout performers so far. And what

0:15:37.360 --> 0:15:40.080
<v Speaker 6>you typically see is when these disruptions happen, you're looking

0:15:40.120 --> 0:15:42.360
<v Speaker 6>at twelve months to fix them. So that's been the

0:15:42.360 --> 0:15:44.920
<v Speaker 6>big disrupted one. And then of course we've had some

0:15:45.040 --> 0:15:47.280
<v Speaker 6>changes in these macro factors that have been a big

0:15:47.360 --> 0:15:49.720
<v Speaker 6>driver for metals, so things like the dollar. The dollar

0:15:49.760 --> 0:15:53.440
<v Speaker 6>weakness had been a big tailwind that reversed briefly. Obviously,

0:15:53.440 --> 0:15:57.080
<v Speaker 6>coming back towards weakness again changes an interest rate expectation,

0:15:57.280 --> 0:15:59.160
<v Speaker 6>so that has taken a bit of the wind out

0:15:59.160 --> 0:16:00.000
<v Speaker 6>of the sales.

0:15:59.720 --> 0:16:01.560
<v Speaker 2>For some of the others. Let's just stick on that line.

0:16:01.600 --> 0:16:04.800
<v Speaker 2>Twelve months to fix, twelve months to fix the production,

0:16:05.000 --> 0:16:07.040
<v Speaker 2>to get back to where we were pre war. What

0:16:07.080 --> 0:16:09.640
<v Speaker 2>does it mean for the demand story over the next year.

0:16:09.680 --> 0:16:11.760
<v Speaker 2>How do you we anticipate that's going to change.

0:16:12.080 --> 0:16:14.200
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, look at we anticipate there'll be about a two

0:16:14.200 --> 0:16:16.800
<v Speaker 6>million ton seplus in the aliminium market, which is a

0:16:16.840 --> 0:16:20.200
<v Speaker 6>lot of demand to try and destroy. I think what

0:16:20.240 --> 0:16:22.680
<v Speaker 6>we're seeing at the moment, similar to oil, we've got

0:16:22.680 --> 0:16:26.040
<v Speaker 6>a very steep backuidation, so downward slope in the aluminium curve.

0:16:26.280 --> 0:16:29.800
<v Speaker 6>What that's trying to do is disincentivize holding excess infantry

0:16:30.120 --> 0:16:32.040
<v Speaker 6>end users at the moment, So we're sort of trying

0:16:32.080 --> 0:16:35.200
<v Speaker 6>to incentivize everyone holds as little as possible for now

0:16:35.360 --> 0:16:36.920
<v Speaker 6>while we try and figure out where we can get

0:16:36.960 --> 0:16:39.240
<v Speaker 6>a bit more supply, and we might also start to

0:16:39.280 --> 0:16:41.320
<v Speaker 6>see a bit of switching, So could you see perhaps

0:16:41.320 --> 0:16:44.400
<v Speaker 6>some substitution towards things like steel in the auto sector.

0:16:45.080 --> 0:16:46.800
<v Speaker 6>But I think it's going to stay a very very

0:16:46.800 --> 0:16:47.360
<v Speaker 6>tight market.

0:16:47.560 --> 0:16:50.360
<v Speaker 5>How much have you seen different regions pull up the

0:16:50.400 --> 0:16:52.680
<v Speaker 5>slack given the fact that the Middle Easter there has

0:16:52.720 --> 0:16:56.040
<v Speaker 5>been a destruction to facilities and a destruction to suppliers,

0:16:56.040 --> 0:16:59.040
<v Speaker 5>So you're seeing, for example, South America start to ramp

0:16:59.120 --> 0:17:02.200
<v Speaker 5>up production, Australia. How much do you see sort of

0:17:02.400 --> 0:17:04.959
<v Speaker 5>a shifting to different parts of the world.

0:17:05.440 --> 0:17:07.760
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, Look, the challenge with aluminium is it's really all

0:17:07.800 --> 0:17:10.800
<v Speaker 6>about electricity supply. And if we think about everything that's

0:17:10.800 --> 0:17:12.840
<v Speaker 6>going on in the world with data centers and AI,

0:17:13.119 --> 0:17:16.200
<v Speaker 6>the one thing that we're struggling with is electricity supply.

0:17:16.520 --> 0:17:18.840
<v Speaker 6>The two regions where really you would think you could

0:17:18.880 --> 0:17:21.760
<v Speaker 6>have a bit of response is China and Indonesia. Now

0:17:21.840 --> 0:17:25.200
<v Speaker 6>China is actually capped on its capacity and potentially there's

0:17:25.200 --> 0:17:27.720
<v Speaker 6>a room to increase slightly your amperage and get a

0:17:27.760 --> 0:17:29.480
<v Speaker 6>little bit more out of it, but that there's not

0:17:29.600 --> 0:17:32.119
<v Speaker 6>that much that China can do. And then Indonesia has

0:17:32.160 --> 0:17:33.840
<v Speaker 6>a good pipeline. But we kind of knew that that

0:17:33.960 --> 0:17:36.560
<v Speaker 6>was coming already. They can't really do much quickly, and

0:17:36.600 --> 0:17:39.560
<v Speaker 6>again takes twelve months to fix a smelter, also takes

0:17:39.600 --> 0:17:42.440
<v Speaker 6>time to ramp one up, and power costs just becoming

0:17:42.600 --> 0:17:44.760
<v Speaker 6>very very difficult. I mean, even in the US we've

0:17:44.800 --> 0:17:48.399
<v Speaker 6>had smelters being sold to data centers, even where in

0:17:48.440 --> 0:17:51.000
<v Speaker 6>the US you've not just got aluminium prices, but you've

0:17:51.000 --> 0:17:54.160
<v Speaker 6>got this record Midwest premium. So the all in price

0:17:54.200 --> 0:17:57.080
<v Speaker 6>here is about six thousand dollars and that's still not

0:17:57.080 --> 0:17:57.600
<v Speaker 6>been enough.

0:17:57.760 --> 0:18:00.520
<v Speaker 5>So this sounds really problematic. This sounds like it should

0:18:00.520 --> 0:18:03.080
<v Speaker 5>be moving markets more. It seems like a shortage, seems

0:18:03.080 --> 0:18:05.439
<v Speaker 5>like something that's going to cause inflation. Are you as

0:18:05.480 --> 0:18:07.320
<v Speaker 5>seguin as the rest of markets that seem to be

0:18:07.440 --> 0:18:09.720
<v Speaker 5>just sort of declaring that all clear mission accomplished.

0:18:10.280 --> 0:18:12.840
<v Speaker 6>I think, look, there's a clearly an element of positioning

0:18:12.840 --> 0:18:15.280
<v Speaker 6>and flows here. Aluminium was already a very very long

0:18:15.320 --> 0:18:17.119
<v Speaker 6>market coming into this, so I would say it's not

0:18:17.160 --> 0:18:19.520
<v Speaker 6>like the market was caught short and had to suddenly cover,

0:18:19.600 --> 0:18:22.240
<v Speaker 6>And I think that explains partly it. Some of this

0:18:22.280 --> 0:18:25.119
<v Speaker 6>is playing out also in the physical premiums in different regions.

0:18:25.119 --> 0:18:27.760
<v Speaker 6>So for example, in Europe, used to pay about three

0:18:27.840 --> 0:18:30.679
<v Speaker 6>hundred dollars on top of the aliminium price to get metal.

0:18:30.800 --> 0:18:33.639
<v Speaker 6>We're now paying six hundred, so that's doubled in the

0:18:33.680 --> 0:18:36.440
<v Speaker 6>Midwest as well, keeps rising japan premiums. So I think

0:18:36.480 --> 0:18:39.600
<v Speaker 6>we are seeing it, but I would say the physical

0:18:39.600 --> 0:18:41.480
<v Speaker 6>realities of this are going to be hung clear as

0:18:41.520 --> 0:18:42.120
<v Speaker 6>time goes on.

0:18:42.320 --> 0:18:44.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is just the latest shark when it

0:18:44.000 --> 0:18:45.919
<v Speaker 1>comes to sky in the Middle East. A lot of

0:18:46.080 --> 0:18:48.680
<v Speaker 1>importers were also dealing with the on and off potential

0:18:48.720 --> 0:18:51.400
<v Speaker 1>of what was going on with Donald Trump's tariff policies.

0:18:51.560 --> 0:18:54.680
<v Speaker 1>Are you seeing more countries stockpile base metals?

0:18:54.920 --> 0:18:57.920
<v Speaker 6>So I think we're seeing more countries, definitely talk about it.

0:18:58.440 --> 0:19:00.920
<v Speaker 6>At the moment, we haven't seen too much in terms

0:19:00.960 --> 0:19:03.880
<v Speaker 6>of what we could say extra buying. But what we

0:19:03.920 --> 0:19:05.800
<v Speaker 6>see is, first of all, this started off with the

0:19:05.920 --> 0:19:08.159
<v Speaker 6>US Project Vaults talking about, you know, we need to

0:19:08.160 --> 0:19:10.120
<v Speaker 6>have stockpiles, we need to make sure we've got security

0:19:10.119 --> 0:19:13.440
<v Speaker 6>of supply chains. We're now seeing the EU, the UK, Australia,

0:19:13.520 --> 0:19:16.880
<v Speaker 6>South Korea, everyone's starting to bring up that word stockpiling,

0:19:17.040 --> 0:19:19.639
<v Speaker 6>and so I think as we've had enough supply shocks

0:19:19.640 --> 0:19:22.520
<v Speaker 6>now we had this in COVID that definitely drove increased

0:19:22.560 --> 0:19:25.239
<v Speaker 6>inventries at the company level. But this time governments are

0:19:25.240 --> 0:19:27.359
<v Speaker 6>paying attention to so I think this is going to

0:19:27.400 --> 0:19:29.440
<v Speaker 6>be a theme for the next few years. That's actually

0:19:29.440 --> 0:19:30.919
<v Speaker 6>going to be pretty bullish for the complex.

0:19:31.080 --> 0:19:32.880
<v Speaker 1>How much of a premium is that aiding to prices?

0:19:33.359 --> 0:19:35.880
<v Speaker 6>So I think this will probably keep your prices well

0:19:35.880 --> 0:19:38.119
<v Speaker 6>above sort of Typically we would say a prices should

0:19:38.119 --> 0:19:40.680
<v Speaker 6>be anchored around cost support or incentive price what you

0:19:40.720 --> 0:19:42.640
<v Speaker 6>need to bring on for a new mine. But if

0:19:42.640 --> 0:19:45.320
<v Speaker 6>you think about inventory building, it's essentially demand. So that

0:19:45.359 --> 0:19:47.479
<v Speaker 6>allows us to trade at a premium. So for example,

0:19:47.560 --> 0:19:49.840
<v Speaker 6>in copper, we would say that kind of incentive price

0:19:49.920 --> 0:19:52.160
<v Speaker 6>is more like ten thousand dollars a ton to bring

0:19:52.200 --> 0:19:54.679
<v Speaker 6>on a new mine, but we forecast price is staying

0:19:54.880 --> 0:19:58.040
<v Speaker 6>well above that sort of twelve thousand dollars through the

0:19:58.080 --> 0:20:00.879
<v Speaker 6>medium term. Just to take into a count that stockpiling.

0:20:01.080 --> 0:20:04.400
<v Speaker 2>Can we finish on gold save the five K what's

0:20:04.440 --> 0:20:06.200
<v Speaker 2>going to happen to demand for gold now? And how

0:20:06.200 --> 0:20:08.439
<v Speaker 2>has that shifted? How has that changed? We've talked so

0:20:08.520 --> 0:20:11.040
<v Speaker 2>much about this massive tail wind of central bank buying.

0:20:11.480 --> 0:20:13.680
<v Speaker 2>Is that still going to be the story was that ended.

0:20:14.280 --> 0:20:15.879
<v Speaker 6>So I think the central bank buying has been the

0:20:15.880 --> 0:20:18.440
<v Speaker 6>sort of stable level of gold demand under the surface,

0:20:18.480 --> 0:20:21.480
<v Speaker 6>although what we did see in March was Turkey's selling

0:20:21.520 --> 0:20:24.440
<v Speaker 6>gold to underpin the lira. In contrast, though we had

0:20:24.520 --> 0:20:27.280
<v Speaker 6>China actually buying the most gold they had bought since

0:20:27.359 --> 0:20:29.520
<v Speaker 6>January twenty twenty five, so a bit of a reaction

0:20:29.600 --> 0:20:32.320
<v Speaker 6>to that pullback in prices. I think the bigger factor

0:20:32.359 --> 0:20:34.320
<v Speaker 6>that's going to swing around is what the exchange traded

0:20:34.400 --> 0:20:36.639
<v Speaker 6>funds are doing. So last year they bought nearly as

0:20:36.720 --> 0:20:39.199
<v Speaker 6>much gold as the central banks, having bought zero the

0:20:39.280 --> 0:20:41.320
<v Speaker 6>year before, so they are the ones that really swing

0:20:41.359 --> 0:20:44.080
<v Speaker 6>their behavior. That's much more dependent on interest rates. So

0:20:44.119 --> 0:20:46.880
<v Speaker 6>again they have been selling, and I think also there

0:20:46.960 --> 0:20:48.879
<v Speaker 6>was quite a lot of buying that was just related

0:20:48.920 --> 0:20:50.480
<v Speaker 6>to how well gold was doing. So I think the

0:20:50.520 --> 0:20:52.800
<v Speaker 6>fact that has come off we've sort of reconnected with

0:20:52.840 --> 0:20:55.879
<v Speaker 6>that real yield story as well. I think maybe that

0:20:56.040 --> 0:20:58.919
<v Speaker 6>stops a bit of the near term upside and just

0:20:59.000 --> 0:21:01.160
<v Speaker 6>keeps it a little bit more to do with fundamental.

0:21:00.840 --> 0:21:03.520
<v Speaker 2>Jo this morning, slightly zero point eight percent, Just one

0:21:03.520 --> 0:21:05.680
<v Speaker 2>final question, slightly outside of your remit, but trying and

0:21:05.720 --> 0:21:09.120
<v Speaker 2>indulge me in this market, particularly in equities, they've taken

0:21:09.160 --> 0:21:11.240
<v Speaker 2>a lot of comfort from the shape of the future's

0:21:11.280 --> 0:21:14.840
<v Speaker 2>curve in crude. At the very front, you've got these

0:21:14.920 --> 0:21:17.399
<v Speaker 2>very elevated prices. The closer you get to the physical

0:21:17.440 --> 0:21:20.280
<v Speaker 2>spot price, you've got a lift in the price. Further

0:21:20.359 --> 0:21:22.720
<v Speaker 2>out you've got a massive decline. That's the banquidation people

0:21:22.760 --> 0:21:25.480
<v Speaker 2>have been talking about now for weeks, six weeks, more

0:21:25.520 --> 0:21:28.320
<v Speaker 2>than a month. People in equity see that as a

0:21:28.359 --> 0:21:32.239
<v Speaker 2>market implied bet on the future price of crude. Is

0:21:32.240 --> 0:21:34.000
<v Speaker 2>that the right way of looking at things when you

0:21:34.040 --> 0:21:35.000
<v Speaker 2>look at a future's curve.

0:21:35.280 --> 0:21:36.719
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, so, look, I think the way we would think

0:21:36.720 --> 0:21:39.320
<v Speaker 6>about the future's curve is more a reflection of inventories

0:21:39.400 --> 0:21:41.840
<v Speaker 6>and flows rather than a forecast for the price. And

0:21:41.840 --> 0:21:44.159
<v Speaker 6>there's a place to metals as well. Typically, when you

0:21:44.200 --> 0:21:46.920
<v Speaker 6>have that downward slope, spot price is higher than futures.

0:21:47.080 --> 0:21:49.679
<v Speaker 6>That's telling people when we need to clear everything out

0:21:49.760 --> 0:21:51.639
<v Speaker 6>of inventory, we need as much oil as you can

0:21:51.680 --> 0:21:53.679
<v Speaker 6>give us at the moment. So, if anything, that downward

0:21:53.680 --> 0:21:56.080
<v Speaker 6>slope is usually a bullish signal for commodity is rather

0:21:56.119 --> 0:21:57.240
<v Speaker 6>than a bearish one.

0:21:57.760 --> 0:22:01.280
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg seventdics podcast, bringing you the best

0:22:01.320 --> 0:22:04.399
<v Speaker 2>in markets, economics, an gio politics. You can watch the

0:22:04.400 --> 0:22:07.360
<v Speaker 2>show live on Bloomberg TV weekday mornings from six am

0:22:07.560 --> 0:22:11.520
<v Speaker 2>to nine am Eastern. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify,

0:22:11.680 --> 0:22:13.879
<v Speaker 2>or anywhere else you listen, and as always, on the

0:22:13.920 --> 0:22:16.359
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Terminal and the Bloomberg Business app