WEBVTT - Draft Show: Our First 2023 Mock Draft

0:00:04.920 --> 0:00:10.559
<v Speaker 1>This is the Dallas Cowboys dot Com Draft Show, your

0:00:10.680 --> 0:00:14.440
<v Speaker 1>war room for insider news and draft analysis from deep

0:00:14.480 --> 0:00:18.360
<v Speaker 1>within the confines of Cowboys headquarters at the Star in Frisco.

0:00:21.840 --> 0:00:30.680
<v Speaker 1>And now your host, Kyle Yeomans. It is the Draft

0:00:30.720 --> 0:00:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Show sponsored by Miller Lite. Brian brought us here. I'm

0:00:35.040 --> 0:00:37.800
<v Speaker 1>so happy to be back in this chair. I love Kyle,

0:00:38.200 --> 0:00:39.960
<v Speaker 1>but it's kind of funny sitting on the other side

0:00:39.960 --> 0:00:42.880
<v Speaker 1>over there, like I like kind of directing this. I

0:00:43.040 --> 0:00:45.320
<v Speaker 1>like to make my scouts uncomfortable. How about that for

0:00:45.360 --> 0:00:48.120
<v Speaker 1>an opening today? That's good. You're greater role today with me.

0:00:48.320 --> 0:00:51.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm not trying to be uncomfortable today. You're ready, You're

0:00:51.080 --> 0:00:53.720
<v Speaker 1>not You're not interested in being uncomfortable today talking about

0:00:53.720 --> 0:00:57.040
<v Speaker 1>the NFL Draft. Nah. My anxiety can't take you can't

0:00:57.080 --> 0:00:59.160
<v Speaker 1>take it. Nah. But it's okay. I'm here though, I'm

0:00:59.160 --> 0:01:02.120
<v Speaker 1>here to let's run well. I guess Aisha Morrison, the

0:01:02.200 --> 0:01:05.880
<v Speaker 1>voice of one of my favorite scouts, young scouts trying

0:01:05.880 --> 0:01:10.280
<v Speaker 1>to get it done. What's going on with you? I'm fine,

0:01:10.319 --> 0:01:12.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm here. I think it's the chair I ain't used

0:01:12.520 --> 0:01:15.520
<v Speaker 1>to be in my direct line to sight. Is that

0:01:15.520 --> 0:01:17.959
<v Speaker 1>bothering you? A little bit to probably stressed me. And

0:01:17.959 --> 0:01:20.319
<v Speaker 1>then Bobby's over there. I'm trying to get my laptop

0:01:20.360 --> 0:01:22.679
<v Speaker 1>to turn on people. That's what I'm trying to do.

0:01:22.840 --> 0:01:24.840
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, we need the goods. Well, you do need

0:01:24.840 --> 0:01:26.679
<v Speaker 1>the goods. That's the voice of Bobby Belt one oh

0:01:26.680 --> 0:01:29.880
<v Speaker 1>five three. The fan just got off his morning show.

0:01:29.920 --> 0:01:32.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure he did some great work, Robert, thank you

0:01:32.560 --> 0:01:35.959
<v Speaker 1>for that's fore, thank you. And then my teammate on

0:01:36.000 --> 0:01:39.759
<v Speaker 1>the afternoons on one oh five three, Zach Walchuk. Again,

0:01:39.840 --> 0:01:42.680
<v Speaker 1>all my scouting buddies here. You know me, guys, I'm

0:01:42.720 --> 0:01:45.000
<v Speaker 1>not gonna waste a lot of time here. I'm not

0:01:45.000 --> 0:01:47.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna waste a lot of time because I don't believe

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:49.720
<v Speaker 1>in wasting time on the Draft Show. Oh god, I

0:01:49.760 --> 0:01:53.000
<v Speaker 1>don't believe in that. Perfect but yeah, I mentioned this

0:01:53.080 --> 0:01:56.120
<v Speaker 1>Draft show is sponsored by Miller Lite, uh, the only

0:01:56.160 --> 0:01:59.640
<v Speaker 1>beer of the Dallas Cowboys. It is Miller time. All right.

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:04.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna get to this as as we embark them. Wait, wait,

0:02:04.840 --> 0:02:07.040
<v Speaker 1>forty nine days now, then we say we were fifty days,

0:02:08.600 --> 0:02:11.600
<v Speaker 1>nine days. Forty nine days until we get to sit

0:02:11.639 --> 0:02:14.440
<v Speaker 1>in this room and kind of dissect everything that's going on.

0:02:15.120 --> 0:02:16.960
<v Speaker 1>I do want to ask you guys some questions, and

0:02:17.040 --> 0:02:18.320
<v Speaker 1>this is kind of how this thing is going to

0:02:18.400 --> 0:02:20.679
<v Speaker 1>go today. I'm going to uh, We're gonna try and

0:02:20.760 --> 0:02:24.000
<v Speaker 1>cover a lot of content early in this thing with

0:02:24.080 --> 0:02:25.760
<v Speaker 1>some players I want I want to I want to

0:02:25.800 --> 0:02:28.080
<v Speaker 1>get my guys opinions. I want to get my scouts

0:02:28.080 --> 0:02:31.079
<v Speaker 1>opinions on some of these guys that they're struggling with,

0:02:31.360 --> 0:02:34.440
<v Speaker 1>maybe some guys that are willing to fight for. We'll

0:02:34.440 --> 0:02:36.639
<v Speaker 1>do some twitter on the twenty. But then in the

0:02:37.320 --> 0:02:39.800
<v Speaker 1>last part of the show, we're gonna draft for the

0:02:39.880 --> 0:02:43.520
<v Speaker 1>NFC East and we're gonna take Dame Brugler's mock draft,

0:02:43.960 --> 0:02:46.720
<v Speaker 1>and I've got some names. I'm gonna give my scouts

0:02:46.840 --> 0:02:50.280
<v Speaker 1>a choice here that they can draft for the Eagles

0:02:50.320 --> 0:02:53.560
<v Speaker 1>at ten, and I'm gonna give my scouts some choice

0:02:53.600 --> 0:02:56.079
<v Speaker 1>for the Commanders and for the Giants, and then we'll

0:02:56.120 --> 0:02:59.000
<v Speaker 1>get to the Dallas Cowboys with the names left, and

0:02:59.000 --> 0:03:01.360
<v Speaker 1>we'll try and and try and kind of work through

0:03:01.400 --> 0:03:04.960
<v Speaker 1>this thing in that regard. So you guys ready to

0:03:05.639 --> 0:03:09.000
<v Speaker 1>ready to get going today, It's never been more ready.

0:03:09.120 --> 0:03:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Got you, Bobby Belt, give me a guy that you'll

0:03:12.520 --> 0:03:17.600
<v Speaker 1>absolutely fight for in this draft, Somebody that you would,

0:03:17.840 --> 0:03:20.480
<v Speaker 1>you know if you said, listen, give me the one opportunity.

0:03:20.639 --> 0:03:23.519
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of times in these war rooms where

0:03:23.560 --> 0:03:27.200
<v Speaker 1>these scouts as they put their board together, they will

0:03:27.320 --> 0:03:31.320
<v Speaker 1>fight for a particular person, whether it's somebody that they're

0:03:31.360 --> 0:03:35.000
<v Speaker 1>on that island by themselves, maybe they've got another scouting

0:03:35.080 --> 0:03:41.320
<v Speaker 1>buddy involved with them. But give me one guy that

0:03:41.360 --> 0:03:46.040
<v Speaker 1>you would absolutely fight for. Stand up on the table,

0:03:46.560 --> 0:03:51.880
<v Speaker 1>bang the table, beat people up to get on your

0:03:52.040 --> 0:03:58.120
<v Speaker 1>football team. Okay, so are we talking about guys that

0:03:59.240 --> 0:04:01.520
<v Speaker 1>have no chance at getting into Dallas twenty six or

0:04:01.560 --> 0:04:03.240
<v Speaker 1>more somebody that we think will be there at some

0:04:03.320 --> 0:04:05.280
<v Speaker 1>point when they're picking. You can give me the guy

0:04:05.360 --> 0:04:08.000
<v Speaker 1>you absolutely one of your favorite players. And I'm not

0:04:08.000 --> 0:04:10.960
<v Speaker 1>talking about a pet cat, But give me somebody. I

0:04:11.000 --> 0:04:13.880
<v Speaker 1>love this guy, but you know what, at twenty six,

0:04:14.000 --> 0:04:18.000
<v Speaker 1>if he gets there, I'm going to cause a ruckus

0:04:19.240 --> 0:04:22.560
<v Speaker 1>in that room. Yeah. I mean I think that when

0:04:22.640 --> 0:04:26.520
<v Speaker 1>you look at if for some way, somehow, obviously a

0:04:26.520 --> 0:04:28.760
<v Speaker 1>guy that would have to slide there would be Joey

0:04:28.800 --> 0:04:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Porter Jr. Who I love and I think is the

0:04:33.160 --> 0:04:36.000
<v Speaker 1>perfect type of corner that they would want here in Dallas,

0:04:36.040 --> 0:04:38.680
<v Speaker 1>the perfect type of player that Joe Witt and Dan

0:04:38.760 --> 0:04:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Quinn could use in the scheme that they need a

0:04:41.360 --> 0:04:43.760
<v Speaker 1>guy who measured in six two and a half thirty

0:04:43.760 --> 0:04:48.080
<v Speaker 1>four inch arms, which is absurd great length, great size,

0:04:48.240 --> 0:04:52.599
<v Speaker 1>great I think play strength, a high I Q a

0:04:52.640 --> 0:04:56.200
<v Speaker 1>good awareness, but that one I don't think is very realistic.

0:04:56.240 --> 0:04:57.520
<v Speaker 1>And so the guy I keep coming back to him,

0:04:57.560 --> 0:04:59.480
<v Speaker 1>and I know we've mentioned him a couple times over

0:04:59.480 --> 0:05:00.920
<v Speaker 1>the last couple weeks. The guy keep coming back to

0:05:01.000 --> 0:05:03.520
<v Speaker 1>that I think is realistically there and I'd be willing

0:05:03.520 --> 0:05:05.440
<v Speaker 1>to fight for among a group of players. Is Luke

0:05:05.520 --> 0:05:08.440
<v Speaker 1>Musgrave the tight end for Morgan State because I think

0:05:08.440 --> 0:05:11.240
<v Speaker 1>that Luke Musgrave, to me, is going to be better

0:05:11.320 --> 0:05:13.520
<v Speaker 1>value where he is than any of the receivers. I

0:05:13.560 --> 0:05:16.400
<v Speaker 1>honestly like Musgrave more than I like any of the receivers,

0:05:16.440 --> 0:05:18.520
<v Speaker 1>more than I like Jackson Smith and Jick but more

0:05:18.560 --> 0:05:21.239
<v Speaker 1>than I like Jordan Addison more than I like Quinton Johnson,

0:05:21.279 --> 0:05:24.039
<v Speaker 1>because I think they all have warts about them that

0:05:24.120 --> 0:05:27.160
<v Speaker 1>other receivers haven't necessarily had in recent years when we've

0:05:27.160 --> 0:05:29.920
<v Speaker 1>had some of the really high end top talent at receiver.

0:05:30.920 --> 0:05:35.760
<v Speaker 1>But Musgrave, to me, just the footwork, I think the

0:05:36.080 --> 0:05:38.640
<v Speaker 1>hands now Obviously, the question with him has also been

0:05:38.640 --> 0:05:42.400
<v Speaker 1>about his availability. His injury history is durability. But if

0:05:42.400 --> 0:05:43.919
<v Speaker 1>you're just talking to me about what type of a

0:05:43.960 --> 0:05:45.520
<v Speaker 1>player he can be, that's a guy that if you

0:05:45.560 --> 0:05:47.200
<v Speaker 1>put him in the offense next year, he's a thousand

0:05:47.240 --> 0:05:49.800
<v Speaker 1>yards to me easy, and I think that he can

0:05:49.920 --> 0:05:52.320
<v Speaker 1>replace what Dalton Schultz did for you, and he can

0:05:52.360 --> 0:05:54.480
<v Speaker 1>do more. He can stretch the field more, and he

0:05:54.600 --> 0:05:57.080
<v Speaker 1>is the type of vertical tight end that I think

0:05:57.520 --> 0:06:00.480
<v Speaker 1>really threatens defense. Is the way that Jerry has talked

0:06:00.480 --> 0:06:02.800
<v Speaker 1>about recently on the bus, in the way that I

0:06:02.839 --> 0:06:04.719
<v Speaker 1>think some people around this team have talked about that

0:06:04.720 --> 0:06:08.160
<v Speaker 1>they'd like to find a really dynamic threat there. Zach Wolchuk,

0:06:08.320 --> 0:06:12.880
<v Speaker 1>he just said that he would fight for Musgrave over

0:06:13.240 --> 0:06:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Smith and Jigba. I've known you now through this draft

0:06:16.880 --> 0:06:21.000
<v Speaker 1>process that that is your favorite player, Is in fact

0:06:21.160 --> 0:06:23.560
<v Speaker 1>that the guy you're going to fight for, or do

0:06:23.600 --> 0:06:25.600
<v Speaker 1>you not feel he is going to be there at

0:06:25.600 --> 0:06:27.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty six for you? I don't think he'll be there

0:06:27.520 --> 0:06:29.800
<v Speaker 1>at twenty six, And if he is, the league has

0:06:29.839 --> 0:06:34.760
<v Speaker 1>made a terrible error in evaluation by letting this guy slide.

0:06:35.279 --> 0:06:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Now I'm gonna go with somebody else because I think

0:06:38.240 --> 0:06:40.640
<v Speaker 1>you guys know my affinity for Jackson Smith and Jigba

0:06:40.720 --> 0:06:43.760
<v Speaker 1>Ohio state wide Ohio state wide receiver and who I

0:06:43.800 --> 0:06:45.680
<v Speaker 1>think is the best wide receiver in the draft, and

0:06:46.040 --> 0:06:49.159
<v Speaker 1>people might be overthinking that he's not when you look

0:06:49.160 --> 0:06:50.960
<v Speaker 1>at some of his college teammates that have come in

0:06:51.000 --> 0:06:54.320
<v Speaker 1>and been productive and they've applauded him for already being better.

0:06:54.800 --> 0:06:57.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to go with an edge rusher here, and

0:06:57.360 --> 0:06:59.440
<v Speaker 1>this is a guy who I kind of had as

0:06:59.480 --> 0:07:04.159
<v Speaker 1>a friend first rounder, but it is King Felix is

0:07:04.200 --> 0:07:07.480
<v Speaker 1>what I call him, Felix and a dk uzoma from

0:07:07.600 --> 0:07:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Kansas State. I love this dude, and I don't think

0:07:11.240 --> 0:07:13.480
<v Speaker 1>you can ever go wrong with taking an offensive or

0:07:13.480 --> 0:07:17.400
<v Speaker 1>defensive lineman. I don't know if the Cowboys, we haven't

0:07:17.440 --> 0:07:19.320
<v Speaker 1>heard a lot of edge rusher when it comes to

0:07:19.360 --> 0:07:22.520
<v Speaker 1>them in the first round. But if they decide, hey,

0:07:22.880 --> 0:07:26.520
<v Speaker 1>the corners aren't there, the damn tight end he can

0:07:26.520 --> 0:07:28.120
<v Speaker 1>stretch a little bit. Maybe we don't want to go

0:07:28.240 --> 0:07:31.400
<v Speaker 1>tight end the receivers they get wiped out. This might

0:07:31.440 --> 0:07:33.560
<v Speaker 1>be a guy that I think could be the best

0:07:33.560 --> 0:07:35.600
<v Speaker 1>player on the board. And I saw a lot of

0:07:35.640 --> 0:07:39.000
<v Speaker 1>like Robert mathis like trades in his game. This dude

0:07:39.600 --> 0:07:45.960
<v Speaker 1>competes his ass off, does not quit, high motor, always working,

0:07:46.120 --> 0:07:50.240
<v Speaker 1>compact build, quick off the ball. Does give up some size, right,

0:07:50.280 --> 0:07:52.040
<v Speaker 1>So he's not the biggest dude in the world. Six four,

0:07:52.080 --> 0:07:55.360
<v Speaker 1>two fifty five. He's big enough, yeah, but he doesn't

0:07:55.400 --> 0:07:57.920
<v Speaker 1>look huge on tape. When you watch him play, He's

0:07:57.960 --> 0:07:59.960
<v Speaker 1>got multiple ways to beat you, which is why I

0:08:00.200 --> 0:08:02.680
<v Speaker 1>love him. He shows multiple pass rush moves. He's got

0:08:02.680 --> 0:08:04.760
<v Speaker 1>good hands. He switched his sides. He can play both

0:08:04.760 --> 0:08:06.920
<v Speaker 1>the right and the left end. You know, we talked

0:08:06.920 --> 0:08:10.200
<v Speaker 1>about what if the Cowboys make some cat moves? Yeah, Bobby,

0:08:10.200 --> 0:08:11.920
<v Speaker 1>you talked about this yesterday on our show with like

0:08:11.960 --> 0:08:14.800
<v Speaker 1>a Dorance Armstrong or something like that. Maybe defensive end

0:08:14.840 --> 0:08:16.240
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden is a sneaky need for them.

0:08:16.240 --> 0:08:18.120
<v Speaker 1>They need to replenish that. I think this is a

0:08:18.200 --> 0:08:20.240
<v Speaker 1>dude that can come in day one and be an

0:08:20.240 --> 0:08:22.920
<v Speaker 1>impact type of player for you. I think he's NFL ready. Zachary,

0:08:22.960 --> 0:08:26.000
<v Speaker 1>give me your list of defensive ends. Okay, give me

0:08:26.040 --> 0:08:28.800
<v Speaker 1>your defensive linz ends down to that player. So I've

0:08:28.840 --> 0:08:33.080
<v Speaker 1>got Willie Anderson one at Alabama. I've got Tyree Wilson,

0:08:33.120 --> 0:08:37.960
<v Speaker 1>it too. Give me Miles Murphy, then Nolan Smith. So

0:08:38.040 --> 0:08:40.560
<v Speaker 1>you feel like all those guys are gonna be gone.

0:08:40.600 --> 0:08:44.680
<v Speaker 1>I think they'd all be gone, Okay, I do, and

0:08:45.000 --> 0:08:47.640
<v Speaker 1>may like Nolan Smith to me was a guy that

0:08:47.679 --> 0:08:49.320
<v Speaker 1>could have been around there, but I think he tested

0:08:49.360 --> 0:08:51.800
<v Speaker 1>so well to come by he's gone. There's no way.

0:08:51.840 --> 0:08:55.120
<v Speaker 1>And then people seem to love Lucas van Ness at Iowa.

0:08:55.240 --> 0:08:58.680
<v Speaker 1>I didn't see it personally, like I think, hold that

0:08:58.720 --> 0:09:00.480
<v Speaker 1>thought because I'm gonna get to some then when we

0:09:00.520 --> 0:09:03.360
<v Speaker 1>get back through. Okay, okay, hold that thought about him.

0:09:03.760 --> 0:09:06.360
<v Speaker 1>But you're looking further. You're looking for an edge because

0:09:06.440 --> 0:09:09.000
<v Speaker 1>you're thinking and maybe you're gonna be wiped out at receiver.

0:09:09.120 --> 0:09:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Possibly you're thinking. You're not enamored with the tight ends

0:09:13.400 --> 0:09:16.520
<v Speaker 1>that might be there, and you're not enamored with any

0:09:16.520 --> 0:09:21.120
<v Speaker 1>potential guard that could be there. Right, Okay, tell me

0:09:21.120 --> 0:09:24.360
<v Speaker 1>about it, scout. Who do you got? If Kalijah Cancie

0:09:24.400 --> 0:09:26.640
<v Speaker 1>from Pittsburgh is still there? I might, I might act

0:09:26.640 --> 0:09:29.520
<v Speaker 1>the fool. I'd like him. I like his flexibility. I

0:09:29.600 --> 0:09:31.439
<v Speaker 1>like well how he shoots gaps. I just like how

0:09:31.480 --> 0:09:34.720
<v Speaker 1>active he is, and he's vicious as a DT, it

0:09:34.760 --> 0:09:36.880
<v Speaker 1>looks like possible he might have some I don't know

0:09:36.920 --> 0:09:40.920
<v Speaker 1>how some teams feel, but similar to um, Tommy that

0:09:41.080 --> 0:09:44.120
<v Speaker 1>performed really well well, I can't perform at a at

0:09:44.120 --> 0:09:47.880
<v Speaker 1>a bare that performed really well at the at Thethwestern

0:09:48.000 --> 0:09:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Northwestern Gap. Yeah, similar to him. I think some teams

0:09:50.800 --> 0:09:53.120
<v Speaker 1>think that this guy may have some flex on the edge,

0:09:53.160 --> 0:09:55.960
<v Speaker 1>possibly because he is such an athlete. So when you

0:09:56.000 --> 0:09:57.680
<v Speaker 1>look at Okay, well, maybe you have a neat for

0:09:57.760 --> 0:10:01.200
<v Speaker 1>an edge situationally, and you trying to find another DT

0:10:01.360 --> 0:10:04.040
<v Speaker 1>to come in here, clog up some some some of

0:10:04.040 --> 0:10:05.880
<v Speaker 1>these lanes and shoot these gaps. I mean he's two

0:10:05.920 --> 0:10:08.079
<v Speaker 1>seventy five. I think he yesterday I liked it. I

0:10:08.120 --> 0:10:10.520
<v Speaker 1>think he was close to two eighties. So yeah, So yeah,

0:10:10.600 --> 0:10:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Colijah Cancy is a guy I might act the full

0:10:12.600 --> 0:10:14.360
<v Speaker 1>four if he's there, but I don't know if he's

0:10:14.400 --> 0:10:18.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna be there. So I think that Colijah Cancy is

0:10:18.400 --> 0:10:21.679
<v Speaker 1>really really good and I would love him here in Dallas. Um.

0:10:22.240 --> 0:10:26.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that again because you mentioned the Cowboys specifically

0:10:26.559 --> 0:10:29.320
<v Speaker 1>do like flexibility. They like guys who can bump inside outside,

0:10:29.400 --> 0:10:31.200
<v Speaker 1>They like guys who can play a bunch of different spots.

0:10:31.840 --> 0:10:35.560
<v Speaker 1>I think for them specifically here in Dallas Canty, especially

0:10:35.600 --> 0:10:37.520
<v Speaker 1>as an edge. I don't think they would ever put

0:10:37.600 --> 0:10:39.680
<v Speaker 1>him at edge just because of the length, because the

0:10:39.760 --> 0:10:41.880
<v Speaker 1>arms came in. What the arms? She was talking about

0:10:42.280 --> 0:10:44.160
<v Speaker 1>other teams? No, no, no, no, no, yeah, yeah, I know.

0:10:44.200 --> 0:10:45.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm just talking about fighting for him here in Dallas.

0:10:46.120 --> 0:10:49.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm referencing that, right, um is that? That's what it?

0:10:49.120 --> 0:10:50.920
<v Speaker 1>But I would love him as long as they're okay

0:10:50.920 --> 0:10:52.560
<v Speaker 1>saying we got a guy who's going to basically play

0:10:52.559 --> 0:10:54.520
<v Speaker 1>three technique for us and that's all he does. Yeah,

0:10:54.760 --> 0:10:57.160
<v Speaker 1>that's all OsO DIGGI Zooa does. That's all other guys

0:10:57.200 --> 0:10:59.680
<v Speaker 1>have done for them before. Then I'm all on board

0:10:59.679 --> 0:11:03.160
<v Speaker 1>with that. I like Zach talking about On a dk

0:11:03.400 --> 0:11:05.600
<v Speaker 1>zoma there was an interesting note. I was doing some research,

0:11:05.840 --> 0:11:07.280
<v Speaker 1>one of the things I do when I'm out of combine.

0:11:07.280 --> 0:11:09.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm just trying to find statistical notes things like that.

0:11:10.040 --> 0:11:13.199
<v Speaker 1>Production wise, he's in a league all on his own.

0:11:13.240 --> 0:11:16.600
<v Speaker 1>So he is the only FBS player to combine for

0:11:16.640 --> 0:11:18.800
<v Speaker 1>at least twenty five tackles for loss and more than

0:11:18.840 --> 0:11:21.440
<v Speaker 1>five forced fumbles over the past two seasons. So he's

0:11:21.480 --> 0:11:24.800
<v Speaker 1>performing at a really high level in a conference that

0:11:24.880 --> 0:11:27.800
<v Speaker 1>people rag on all the time for their defense. Yeah,

0:11:28.360 --> 0:11:31.199
<v Speaker 1>and so I mean I think production wise, he's great.

0:11:31.320 --> 0:11:34.640
<v Speaker 1>The traits are really interesting with him, and so I

0:11:34.640 --> 0:11:36.719
<v Speaker 1>mean I think those are both good names. Yeah, and

0:11:36.880 --> 0:11:39.760
<v Speaker 1>you you mentioned the traits and all of that stuff

0:11:39.760 --> 0:11:41.800
<v Speaker 1>in the production When we were talking to Will McClay

0:11:41.800 --> 0:11:44.480
<v Speaker 1>on the Draft show, I was a word that he used.

0:11:45.200 --> 0:11:48.440
<v Speaker 1>He used adamantly like production is important to them and

0:11:48.720 --> 0:11:51.559
<v Speaker 1>how I'm assuming that that's something that they're looking at

0:11:51.640 --> 0:11:54.840
<v Speaker 1>more so moving forward. So that's important as well. I

0:11:54.920 --> 0:11:57.400
<v Speaker 1>do like the I do like all the ones that

0:11:57.480 --> 0:12:00.240
<v Speaker 1>you guys are talking about here. The Cancy one is

0:12:00.360 --> 0:12:03.680
<v Speaker 1>very interesting to me because, like I say, I've been

0:12:03.679 --> 0:12:05.920
<v Speaker 1>fortunate if you and I have had the discussion about

0:12:05.960 --> 0:12:08.880
<v Speaker 1>Leroy Glover when I was in pro personnel here with

0:12:08.920 --> 0:12:11.640
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys, and I'll never forget you couldn't have driven

0:12:11.640 --> 0:12:14.079
<v Speaker 1>a nail up my butt when Jerry Jones asked me,

0:12:14.720 --> 0:12:17.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're about to hand this guy five million dollars?

0:12:17.720 --> 0:12:21.000
<v Speaker 1>You okay with that? And it took every bit of

0:12:21.040 --> 0:12:24.360
<v Speaker 1>confidence that I had to say yeah, because you're talking

0:12:24.360 --> 0:12:27.520
<v Speaker 1>about a shorter guy, but you're talking about a guy

0:12:27.640 --> 0:12:31.480
<v Speaker 1>like what I used just talk disruptive, you know, plays

0:12:31.600 --> 0:12:34.839
<v Speaker 1>up field, tackles for loss, things like that. I mean

0:12:34.920 --> 0:12:38.160
<v Speaker 1>that that to me is a very interesting, you know

0:12:38.280 --> 0:12:41.160
<v Speaker 1>interesting time. The guy I would fight for is be

0:12:41.280 --> 0:12:44.280
<v Speaker 1>Jean Robinson. That's the guy I would fight for. Dang,

0:12:44.320 --> 0:12:45.679
<v Speaker 1>I didn't want to be I didn't want us to

0:12:45.720 --> 0:12:48.040
<v Speaker 1>be And I love that. I know that that should

0:12:48.520 --> 0:12:50.960
<v Speaker 1>that should that shouldn't have to be a fight. It shouldn't.

0:12:51.000 --> 0:12:54.480
<v Speaker 1>And but I think, but I think where I think

0:12:54.520 --> 0:12:57.439
<v Speaker 1>it will be a fight is I don't I worry

0:12:57.480 --> 0:12:59.600
<v Speaker 1>about how this Cowboys are going to handle this running

0:12:59.600 --> 0:13:02.400
<v Speaker 1>back sit situation, positional value. I mean, yeah, they've got

0:13:02.400 --> 0:13:05.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty eight million dollars right now tied up in running backs.

0:13:05.679 --> 0:13:08.600
<v Speaker 1>You know that's that's that's a fact. But you know,

0:13:08.840 --> 0:13:11.960
<v Speaker 1>to me, I would have personally started over, is what

0:13:12.040 --> 0:13:14.040
<v Speaker 1>I would have I agree, I would have started over,

0:13:14.120 --> 0:13:16.400
<v Speaker 1>and I would have started with Bijean Robinson is who

0:13:16.400 --> 0:13:19.160
<v Speaker 1>I would have started with. That's the guy I That's

0:13:19.200 --> 0:13:22.199
<v Speaker 1>the guy I kind of I you know, if somehow,

0:13:22.320 --> 0:13:25.000
<v Speaker 1>some way he were to get to me, it would

0:13:25.040 --> 0:13:29.800
<v Speaker 1>be really hard for me to say, guys, that's the

0:13:29.840 --> 0:13:32.320
<v Speaker 1>best player on the board right now, isn't it in it,

0:13:32.640 --> 0:13:34.520
<v Speaker 1>and I would like, I would look every one of

0:13:34.520 --> 0:13:36.840
<v Speaker 1>you in the eye and say that, and I would

0:13:36.960 --> 0:13:40.240
<v Speaker 1>make I would challenge you to tell me that it's

0:13:40.280 --> 0:13:42.520
<v Speaker 1>not true now and I would agree with you. My

0:13:42.640 --> 0:13:44.760
<v Speaker 1>thing is, I feel like in this entire process, and

0:13:44.800 --> 0:13:47.559
<v Speaker 1>you've done this a long time, Brian Bijean, Robinsons have

0:13:47.640 --> 0:13:50.480
<v Speaker 1>done radio a long time too. Bijean might be winning

0:13:50.480 --> 0:13:52.600
<v Speaker 1>this more than any other player because you look at

0:13:52.640 --> 0:13:55.200
<v Speaker 1>the combine and it's like, Okay, you're trying to match up,

0:13:55.200 --> 0:13:58.360
<v Speaker 1>to match up what I saw in film. He tested well,

0:13:58.679 --> 0:14:01.560
<v Speaker 1>the interview process seemed like it went well. The tape

0:14:01.679 --> 0:14:04.960
<v Speaker 1>is fantastic with him. I am just finding it harder

0:14:04.960 --> 0:14:07.000
<v Speaker 1>and harder to believe he's gonna be available when the

0:14:07.040 --> 0:14:09.719
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys are on the clock. Yeah, you mentioned that you

0:14:09.760 --> 0:14:13.160
<v Speaker 1>would start over. I so my only thing about the

0:14:13.200 --> 0:14:16.720
<v Speaker 1>starting over is you are installing a new not a

0:14:16.840 --> 0:14:19.480
<v Speaker 1>totally new, but a new offense this upcoming season. Sure

0:14:19.680 --> 0:14:22.480
<v Speaker 1>would that possibly be a reason why maybe you wouldn't

0:14:22.560 --> 0:14:24.440
<v Speaker 1>just start over, because I did. I saw a lot

0:14:24.480 --> 0:14:27.240
<v Speaker 1>of people talking about that with UH with Tony poll

0:14:27.320 --> 0:14:30.280
<v Speaker 1>again franchise Tach, like I would have just started over

0:14:30.480 --> 0:14:32.760
<v Speaker 1>or whatever. But do you is there some pause with

0:14:32.840 --> 0:14:34.840
<v Speaker 1>the fact that you are bringing in a new offense,

0:14:34.840 --> 0:14:36.960
<v Speaker 1>you have a new running back coach. Yeah, I mean

0:14:37.000 --> 0:14:38.960
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a lot of shifting going on to just

0:14:39.000 --> 0:14:41.080
<v Speaker 1>be like, hey, Rook, let's go out there and do it.

0:14:41.120 --> 0:14:43.360
<v Speaker 1>Let's be done. I kind of feel like with him,

0:14:43.880 --> 0:14:47.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm loading the wagon and let no. I mean to me,

0:14:48.800 --> 0:14:51.120
<v Speaker 1>oh yeah, oh he is that? Oh? I think so? Yeah.

0:14:51.160 --> 0:14:53.760
<v Speaker 1>And the thing about it is the kid Gibbs from

0:14:53.760 --> 0:14:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Alabama might be just as good close close. That's about

0:14:56.960 --> 0:14:59.440
<v Speaker 1>to say. Yeah, see to me, if if you were,

0:14:59.560 --> 0:15:01.760
<v Speaker 1>if you were step up in that room and say,

0:15:02.080 --> 0:15:06.120
<v Speaker 1>brought us you're wrong. We got Gibbs tag touching Robinson's tag.

0:15:06.600 --> 0:15:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Why can't you just wait? Why that's a better player.

0:15:09.920 --> 0:15:12.680
<v Speaker 1>I would respect, I would respect one of you if

0:15:12.720 --> 0:15:14.840
<v Speaker 1>you said that to me, and I think you would.

0:15:15.320 --> 0:15:17.640
<v Speaker 1>I think you would say, wait a minute, Brian, what

0:15:17.720 --> 0:15:20.760
<v Speaker 1>about that Alabama kid? Why why are we not talking

0:15:20.800 --> 0:15:25.760
<v Speaker 1>about him right now? You know? So I appreciate that.

0:15:26.280 --> 0:15:29.760
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's go around real quick if we can,

0:15:29.880 --> 0:15:32.240
<v Speaker 1>because we got Twitter on the twenty coming up. I

0:15:32.280 --> 0:15:35.440
<v Speaker 1>want to get to these questions too, But I also

0:15:35.480 --> 0:15:40.280
<v Speaker 1>want to know is there a guy that if it

0:15:40.360 --> 0:15:44.000
<v Speaker 1>turns into he's there and you're like, listen, I'm not

0:15:44.040 --> 0:15:47.880
<v Speaker 1>trying to kill these kids, you know when it comes to,

0:15:48.760 --> 0:15:51.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, not wanting them. But is there a pick

0:15:51.520 --> 0:15:54.840
<v Speaker 1>that they would make that you would say that's a

0:15:54.840 --> 0:15:56.800
<v Speaker 1>little tough from I always call it the pin throw

0:15:57.240 --> 0:15:59.360
<v Speaker 1>where you know, darn you know that kind of thing

0:15:59.360 --> 0:16:02.280
<v Speaker 1>where a guy goes and stuff like that. Zach, you

0:16:02.360 --> 0:16:05.240
<v Speaker 1>got a player that if they took him, you would

0:16:05.240 --> 0:16:08.240
<v Speaker 1>just pause. I'm not saying you would just totally. I

0:16:08.280 --> 0:16:10.080
<v Speaker 1>mean you, as a scout, you would put it down,

0:16:10.160 --> 0:16:12.440
<v Speaker 1>you'd mark it on your sheet, and you just get

0:16:12.480 --> 0:16:15.720
<v Speaker 1>ready for the next pick, you know, in the first round.

0:16:15.720 --> 0:16:17.200
<v Speaker 1>And I've seen this and I don't think that this

0:16:17.280 --> 0:16:22.280
<v Speaker 1>guy's a first rounder, but it's it's eca at a Baylor. Yeah, Like,

0:16:22.400 --> 0:16:24.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't think this dude's a first round pick for

0:16:24.240 --> 0:16:28.800
<v Speaker 1>me defensive tackle and I think that I've and you know,

0:16:28.880 --> 0:16:31.160
<v Speaker 1>I've gone back and forth about this. I think Mozzi

0:16:31.240 --> 0:16:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Smith is just better personally. But I mean I looked

0:16:34.720 --> 0:16:37.160
<v Speaker 1>at him. He's a big body. Uh, he's got a

0:16:37.160 --> 0:16:40.040
<v Speaker 1>good anchor, he's good at the point of attack, and

0:16:40.080 --> 0:16:41.840
<v Speaker 1>he's got good awareness and a feel for the game

0:16:41.880 --> 0:16:43.360
<v Speaker 1>in terms of I think he's really good in the

0:16:43.400 --> 0:16:46.680
<v Speaker 1>screen game, but I just didn't I was just underwhelmed

0:16:46.720 --> 0:16:49.160
<v Speaker 1>watching him. I just didn't see a ton of production,

0:16:49.520 --> 0:16:51.480
<v Speaker 1>and I feel like, would you be really wrong about him?

0:16:51.480 --> 0:16:52.920
<v Speaker 1>I could be a hundred percent. I could be wrong

0:16:52.920 --> 0:16:54.520
<v Speaker 1>about him because he's got some you know. I can

0:16:54.560 --> 0:16:56.840
<v Speaker 1>see the Vita vea type of comparison, like as a

0:16:56.960 --> 0:16:59.160
<v Speaker 1>dancing bear type. And it might have just been the

0:16:59.200 --> 0:17:02.120
<v Speaker 1>games I watch, maybe the production. Maybe it's just a

0:17:02.200 --> 0:17:04.719
<v Speaker 1>lacking there. But if they were detained, I don't think

0:17:04.760 --> 0:17:06.560
<v Speaker 1>they would. The Cowboys don't seem like they put a

0:17:06.560 --> 0:17:09.440
<v Speaker 1>massive value in defensive tackle to take him at twenty six. Yeah,

0:17:09.480 --> 0:17:12.399
<v Speaker 1>but Siaki Ecuy, I'd be like, man, they could have

0:17:12.400 --> 0:17:14.520
<v Speaker 1>gone somewhere else. Another guy would be Trent and Simpson

0:17:14.520 --> 0:17:17.000
<v Speaker 1>at a Clemson. I just don't see it with Trent

0:17:17.040 --> 0:17:19.679
<v Speaker 1>and Simpson personally. I think that dude is a bust

0:17:19.680 --> 0:17:21.920
<v Speaker 1>waiting to happen. I don't say that, I really did

0:17:21.920 --> 0:17:25.240
<v Speaker 1>say all that. I would just say he's standard. Okay,

0:17:25.320 --> 0:17:30.760
<v Speaker 1>well give me give me your guy. Uh don't kill me. No, No,

0:17:30.800 --> 0:17:33.240
<v Speaker 1>we're not. It's not about this is not about this

0:17:33.280 --> 0:17:35.320
<v Speaker 1>would be the guy that if they took. And I'm

0:17:35.320 --> 0:17:37.480
<v Speaker 1>just saying if the guy in the room, because there's

0:17:37.520 --> 0:17:39.359
<v Speaker 1>times I trust me, I've sat in that room and

0:17:39.359 --> 0:17:41.800
<v Speaker 1>you we've taken players and I've just put my head

0:17:41.840 --> 0:17:43.879
<v Speaker 1>down and wrote wrote the name down on the on

0:17:43.920 --> 0:17:46.280
<v Speaker 1>the sheet and moved to the next guy. That's what

0:17:46.320 --> 0:17:48.439
<v Speaker 1>I did. So I'm not trying to not trying to

0:17:48.480 --> 0:17:51.760
<v Speaker 1>just you know, kill these kids. I'm just saying, who's

0:17:51.840 --> 0:17:54.480
<v Speaker 1>that name that you have, and maybe it's a guy

0:17:54.520 --> 0:17:56.960
<v Speaker 1>you're struggling with. I'll tell you my guy real quick.

0:17:57.440 --> 0:18:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Is the guy that iowa is van Ness? I struggle

0:18:01.080 --> 0:18:03.520
<v Speaker 1>with him. I mean, if if they took van Ness,

0:18:03.720 --> 0:18:05.480
<v Speaker 1>I would I would put my head down and write

0:18:05.480 --> 0:18:08.000
<v Speaker 1>the name on and would probably be damned wrong about

0:18:08.040 --> 0:18:11.000
<v Speaker 1>the guy. Yeah, you know I probably would be, But

0:18:11.080 --> 0:18:12.800
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of that. I'm just trying to get a

0:18:12.880 --> 0:18:14.720
<v Speaker 1>feel where you are in the room when we make

0:18:14.800 --> 0:18:17.960
<v Speaker 1>this pick. If it's one of these guys, my room's

0:18:18.000 --> 0:18:19.879
<v Speaker 1>not going to be very happier right now. Sure it

0:18:19.920 --> 0:18:22.840
<v Speaker 1>depends for me, it depends on what they're looking for.

0:18:22.920 --> 0:18:25.960
<v Speaker 1>But I would be confused a little bit if they

0:18:25.960 --> 0:18:29.200
<v Speaker 1>took Drew Sanders from an arkisade. Okay, okay, I would

0:18:29.200 --> 0:18:32.520
<v Speaker 1>be confused because of how he plays and what he does.

0:18:32.760 --> 0:18:35.800
<v Speaker 1>These linebackers you've said all along, are not wowing you.

0:18:36.480 --> 0:18:41.159
<v Speaker 1>I mean, yeah, that's fair, they're not. Yeah, that's fair. No,

0:18:41.359 --> 0:18:43.680
<v Speaker 1>just own that because I agree with I don't. I

0:18:43.720 --> 0:18:46.680
<v Speaker 1>don't disagree with yet I'm struggling with these guys. Well,

0:18:46.680 --> 0:18:50.440
<v Speaker 1>I think that he gets a lot of the attention

0:18:50.560 --> 0:18:53.359
<v Speaker 1>because of the pass rush ability, because of the fact

0:18:53.359 --> 0:18:56.840
<v Speaker 1>that he can do other things that aren't just linebackers stuff.

0:18:57.160 --> 0:19:01.800
<v Speaker 1>But for this defense, I mean, they rush safeties when

0:19:01.800 --> 0:19:04.919
<v Speaker 1>they need to say, they rush from the tackle like

0:19:04.960 --> 0:19:10.000
<v Speaker 1>they do so much from a Russian standpoint that that

0:19:10.119 --> 0:19:13.040
<v Speaker 1>to me would be to add him would be helpful.

0:19:13.080 --> 0:19:14.639
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time, it would be like, do

0:19:14.680 --> 0:19:17.400
<v Speaker 1>I need this or do I need a true linebacker

0:19:17.480 --> 0:19:19.840
<v Speaker 1>right now to man the middle of the field, so

0:19:20.040 --> 0:19:22.639
<v Speaker 1>Micah can do whatever you want to do. So I

0:19:22.640 --> 0:19:24.919
<v Speaker 1>would be weird. It would be like, all right, he

0:19:25.119 --> 0:19:28.159
<v Speaker 1>might be the best linebacker technically, yeah, because he can

0:19:28.200 --> 0:19:30.639
<v Speaker 1>rush the pastor as well, but does he fit into

0:19:30.680 --> 0:19:36.320
<v Speaker 1>this defense right now? That's me y U A couple

0:19:36.400 --> 0:19:38.919
<v Speaker 1>guys probably, and it's one of them that I like

0:19:39.040 --> 0:19:42.880
<v Speaker 1>the potential, but Keiley Ringo in the first round would

0:19:42.880 --> 0:19:45.440
<v Speaker 1>be a little tough. Now. See, they they've developed a

0:19:45.480 --> 0:19:47.800
<v Speaker 1>reputation here in Dallas for when they bank on traits

0:19:47.840 --> 0:19:49.760
<v Speaker 1>and they take somebody that a lot of people are like, oh,

0:19:49.880 --> 0:19:51.639
<v Speaker 1>really raw. The trades are there, but that's raw, and

0:19:51.640 --> 0:19:53.440
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of questions. It's worked out for them

0:19:53.480 --> 0:19:56.399
<v Speaker 1>a lot in the last decade, and so I would

0:19:56.440 --> 0:19:59.480
<v Speaker 1>I would have my most optimistic view of if they

0:19:59.520 --> 0:20:01.320
<v Speaker 1>are doing then I'm trusting that they know what kind

0:20:01.320 --> 0:20:02.800
<v Speaker 1>of a study and what kind of a student and

0:20:02.840 --> 0:20:04.800
<v Speaker 1>worker this guy will be. So that would be one

0:20:05.680 --> 0:20:08.399
<v Speaker 1>more than Ringo even for me, would probably be Keyon

0:20:08.520 --> 0:20:11.600
<v Speaker 1>White from Georgia. I'm not seeing Keyon White from Georgia

0:20:11.640 --> 0:20:14.199
<v Speaker 1>Tech myself. I would I would struggle with that, and

0:20:14.240 --> 0:20:16.680
<v Speaker 1>I know a lot of people are mocking him, and

0:20:16.720 --> 0:20:19.200
<v Speaker 1>I've seen guys like have him in their top fifty.

0:20:19.720 --> 0:20:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Like at twenty one it was a senior Bowl. It

0:20:22.600 --> 0:20:25.160
<v Speaker 1>was a senior Bowl. The traits are there. I could

0:20:25.160 --> 0:20:27.320
<v Speaker 1>get on board with Keyon White at twenty six. I

0:20:27.400 --> 0:20:29.640
<v Speaker 1>think he's got upside. Yeah, I mean, look, I think

0:20:29.680 --> 0:20:32.560
<v Speaker 1>twenty six is rich, but if the Cowboys made that pick,

0:20:32.600 --> 0:20:34.879
<v Speaker 1>I'd be banking on they know something. They've hit on

0:20:34.960 --> 0:20:37.880
<v Speaker 1>first rounders, and I don't see a Taco Charlton here.

0:20:38.119 --> 0:20:39.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean I see a guy that's got a quick

0:20:39.720 --> 0:20:42.440
<v Speaker 1>get off. I mean he's a he's a former type

0:20:42.440 --> 0:20:44.959
<v Speaker 1>a basketball player, that thin and you can see that body.

0:20:45.960 --> 0:20:47.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he's got a strong bull rush. I think

0:20:47.760 --> 0:20:50.120
<v Speaker 1>he's got a good combination of speed and power off

0:20:50.119 --> 0:20:51.840
<v Speaker 1>the edge. I think that's a due that could end

0:20:51.920 --> 0:20:54.520
<v Speaker 1>up being a really good, big difference between Keyon White

0:20:54.520 --> 0:20:57.680
<v Speaker 1>and Taco Charleton. Keyon White can bend. Yeah, Taco Charlton

0:20:57.720 --> 0:21:00.000
<v Speaker 1>didn't show a lot of that, at least I didn't.

0:21:00.400 --> 0:21:02.440
<v Speaker 1>He's at Michigan. But I only bring up Tacco because

0:21:02.440 --> 0:21:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Cowboy fans, right, if you don't like the pick, that'd

0:21:04.640 --> 0:21:07.199
<v Speaker 1>be the immediate comp like, oh, they just they just

0:21:07.240 --> 0:21:09.920
<v Speaker 1>busted on another first rounder here with with Taco taking

0:21:09.960 --> 0:21:11.639
<v Speaker 1>a defensive end and don't look at me like that.

0:21:12.359 --> 0:21:15.280
<v Speaker 1>The early second round guy, I think he's a second rounder.

0:21:15.359 --> 0:21:16.800
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't have him in. I don't think i'd have

0:21:16.880 --> 0:21:19.520
<v Speaker 1>him top fifth. The problem I'm struggling with, and I've

0:21:19.520 --> 0:21:23.080
<v Speaker 1>mentioned Van Ness. I had Van Ness over him. And

0:21:23.200 --> 0:21:26.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm not a van Ness fan. Yeah see, I see

0:21:26.560 --> 0:21:29.800
<v Speaker 1>more explosiveness in White than van Ness. But I think

0:21:29.800 --> 0:21:31.760
<v Speaker 1>I wonder, and you brought this up with the defense

0:21:31.800 --> 0:21:33.919
<v Speaker 1>and the way the Cowboys defense is set up, I

0:21:33.920 --> 0:21:37.679
<v Speaker 1>wonder if it's the way Iowa played Van Nest that

0:21:37.800 --> 0:21:40.040
<v Speaker 1>has me a little timid on him. They're they're a players.

0:21:40.080 --> 0:21:42.400
<v Speaker 1>I always got. It's amazing They've got the players they

0:21:42.440 --> 0:21:44.119
<v Speaker 1>do and they and they are. And you brought it

0:21:44.240 --> 0:21:47.680
<v Speaker 1>up about how technically sound they are and tough and

0:21:47.840 --> 0:21:50.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, all these things about it. Every time I've

0:21:50.440 --> 0:21:53.680
<v Speaker 1>seem to have I've liked an Iowa guy. Iowa guy,

0:21:53.920 --> 0:21:58.000
<v Speaker 1>he's kind of let me down. I like that linebacker Campbell. Yeah, yeah, no,

0:21:58.200 --> 0:22:01.520
<v Speaker 1>that's oh yeah, I mean Jack Campbell. Yeah, he's he

0:22:01.600 --> 0:22:04.960
<v Speaker 1>might be the best linebacker in the draft skin clothes.

0:22:05.520 --> 0:22:07.280
<v Speaker 1>It's good. I mean, as we get down to the

0:22:07.320 --> 0:22:09.720
<v Speaker 1>wire and you start really looking at what everybody can do,

0:22:10.520 --> 0:22:13.560
<v Speaker 1>you're like, yeah, okay. But he, like we talked about it,

0:22:13.600 --> 0:22:15.760
<v Speaker 1>he tested so much better than what I thought he was.

0:22:16.000 --> 0:22:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Want to Jack Campbell. He was surprisingly efficient in coverage,

0:22:19.840 --> 0:22:21.639
<v Speaker 1>like what he does, being able to drop into the

0:22:21.720 --> 0:22:25.679
<v Speaker 1>zone and affect the slam hips just flip naturally. I

0:22:25.840 --> 0:22:28.040
<v Speaker 1>was I was surprised. He was a bright spot to me.

0:22:28.200 --> 0:22:30.639
<v Speaker 1>I was surprised by him too. All Right, I appreciate

0:22:30.680 --> 0:22:34.360
<v Speaker 1>your guys thought about that. We got through that, okay, right,

0:22:34.760 --> 0:22:42.040
<v Speaker 1>was solid. Oh no, I didn't say, oh six, you

0:22:42.040 --> 0:22:44.040
<v Speaker 1>don't like no, no, no, no. I just want to

0:22:44.040 --> 0:22:46.600
<v Speaker 1>see Bobby's face. I just I don't want to. I

0:22:47.080 --> 0:22:50.000
<v Speaker 1>doubt there's an alignment like if Scronsky got down there. Okay,

0:22:50.040 --> 0:22:52.040
<v Speaker 1>we can play. But just in general, I think the

0:22:52.160 --> 0:22:54.200
<v Speaker 1>application of resources, I don't know that I want to

0:22:54.240 --> 0:22:56.600
<v Speaker 1>pick a line Darnel right. I don't think I want

0:22:56.600 --> 0:22:59.560
<v Speaker 1>to pick an off out of Tennessee. I take Darnel

0:22:59.640 --> 0:23:01.560
<v Speaker 1>right in the heart. I don't want to take another

0:23:01.600 --> 0:23:03.480
<v Speaker 1>offensive lineman at twenty six. I just I don't know

0:23:03.520 --> 0:23:06.000
<v Speaker 1>that that's a effective use of resources given the holes

0:23:06.000 --> 0:23:07.640
<v Speaker 1>you have on this team right now. All right, that's

0:23:07.640 --> 0:23:10.120
<v Speaker 1>so fair, I'll like it. All right, Well, we're gonna

0:23:10.160 --> 0:23:11.760
<v Speaker 1>take a little break, we're gonna come back, and we're

0:23:11.760 --> 0:23:13.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna play a little twitter onto twenty We'll get to

0:23:13.800 --> 0:23:17.920
<v Speaker 1>your questions. We'll do that next on the Draft Show. Hey,

0:23:17.920 --> 0:23:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys fans, If you're looking for a full time or

0:23:20.640 --> 0:23:23.639
<v Speaker 1>part time job, check out Liberty Tax, proud partner of

0:23:23.640 --> 0:23:26.720
<v Speaker 1>the Dallas Cowboys. If you've got tax experience and want

0:23:26.720 --> 0:23:30.160
<v Speaker 1>to help your community with their finances, you're the perfect candidate.

0:23:30.280 --> 0:23:33.600
<v Speaker 1>No tax experience. We also offer in person tax school

0:23:33.680 --> 0:23:37.280
<v Speaker 1>courses locally. Liberty Tax has seventy nine locations across the

0:23:37.440 --> 0:23:40.880
<v Speaker 1>of W and two thousand, three hundred offices nationwide. Learn

0:23:40.920 --> 0:23:44.119
<v Speaker 1>more about our job opportunities at liberty tax dot com,

0:23:44.160 --> 0:23:47.600
<v Speaker 1>slash hiring, or call your local Liberty Tax office today.

0:23:47.760 --> 0:23:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Creating something flavorful replace that bloated burrito feeling with Smoothie

0:23:51.119 --> 0:23:56.200
<v Speaker 1>King's new power Meal smoothies. With three delicious flavors like cinnamon, banana, blueberry, raspberry,

0:23:56.280 --> 0:23:59.480
<v Speaker 1>and spinach pineapple. You can fill up on flavor, not calories.

0:23:59.760 --> 0:24:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Each meal replacement smoothie is packed with twenty grams of protein,

0:24:02.640 --> 0:24:05.280
<v Speaker 1>seven grams of fiber, and twenty three vitamins and minerals,

0:24:05.400 --> 0:24:07.760
<v Speaker 1>all under three hundred fifty calories with zero grams of

0:24:07.800 --> 0:24:10.720
<v Speaker 1>added sugar. So next time you want something flavorful, swap

0:24:10.760 --> 0:24:13.560
<v Speaker 1>fast food for our power meal smoothie. Order today on

0:24:13.720 --> 0:24:16.560
<v Speaker 1>the Smoothie king app Smoothie King, the official smoothie of

0:24:16.600 --> 0:24:19.720
<v Speaker 1>the Dallas Cowboys. I'm Darren Wood's former Dallas Cowboy player

0:24:19.720 --> 0:24:22.040
<v Speaker 1>and Super Bowl champion. When I played in the NFL

0:24:22.080 --> 0:24:24.159
<v Speaker 1>at a high level, I relied on my vision to

0:24:24.200 --> 0:24:27.000
<v Speaker 1>see the field. As I started getting older, I noticed

0:24:27.000 --> 0:24:29.639
<v Speaker 1>my vision wasn't as good and I was getting frustrated

0:24:29.640 --> 0:24:32.000
<v Speaker 1>from wearing my glasses all day. I went to Laser

0:24:32.040 --> 0:24:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Cure Eye Center and Doctor G talked about all the options.

0:24:35.560 --> 0:24:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Thanks to technology and Laser Cure Eye Center, I can

0:24:38.240 --> 0:24:42.000
<v Speaker 1>see near far in between. Don't fumble your vision any long.

0:24:42.240 --> 0:24:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Visit them at dfwiis dot com and tell them Darren

0:24:45.640 --> 0:24:48.280
<v Speaker 1>sent you. They got me back on my game. What

0:24:48.320 --> 0:24:50.320
<v Speaker 1>do you call a group of grown men and women

0:24:50.359 --> 0:24:53.199
<v Speaker 1>with their faces painted silver and blue who get together

0:24:53.280 --> 0:24:56.880
<v Speaker 1>every week to share a three hour long ritual of jumping, sinking,

0:24:56.960 --> 0:24:59.960
<v Speaker 1>and toasting Miller light and Tim Gallan hats while yelling

0:25:00.200 --> 0:25:04.880
<v Speaker 1>how about them cowboys? You call it Miller Time in Dallas.

0:25:07.480 --> 0:25:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Here's to the Cowboys, Here's to the original light beer.

0:25:11.000 --> 0:25:15.280
<v Speaker 1>It's Miller Time. Celebrate Responsibility twenty twenty one, Miller Brewing

0:25:15.320 --> 0:25:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Company for Words, Texas. This is the Dallas Cowboys dot

0:25:20.600 --> 0:25:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Com Draft Show. Thank you very much, there Beamer. We're

0:25:27.640 --> 0:25:31.159
<v Speaker 1>back here with the Draft Show again, sponsored by Miller Lite. Uh,

0:25:31.359 --> 0:25:34.439
<v Speaker 1>it's tax season. If you guys didn't know that it

0:25:34.440 --> 0:25:37.280
<v Speaker 1>could be stressful, just like picking these players. A last

0:25:37.320 --> 0:25:40.320
<v Speaker 1>second Hail Mary. With the game on the line, Overcome

0:25:40.400 --> 0:25:48.320
<v Speaker 1>your tax, tax your anxiety, tax like taxiety, taxiety today

0:25:48.359 --> 0:25:51.800
<v Speaker 1>with Liberty Tax, proud partner of the Dallas Cowboys, booking

0:25:51.800 --> 0:25:55.720
<v Speaker 1>a point with Liberty Tax dot com Slash Cowboys had

0:25:55.720 --> 0:25:59.080
<v Speaker 1>some tax anxiety reading next, anxiety is real? Is it really?

0:25:59.160 --> 0:26:03.160
<v Speaker 1>It's a real time. I've got I've got plenty of it. Yeah, listening,

0:26:03.280 --> 0:26:04.919
<v Speaker 1>I had to write a big old check. I've been

0:26:06.640 --> 0:26:08.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna have to write a check that begins with

0:26:08.280 --> 0:26:12.360
<v Speaker 1>a seven and it's not hundred Oh barnacles lobby, that's

0:26:12.400 --> 0:26:14.720
<v Speaker 1>what That's what you get for having seventeen jobs. Yeah,

0:26:14.800 --> 0:26:18.199
<v Speaker 1>there's more in this than just coffee listening. Good for you,

0:26:18.240 --> 0:26:21.800
<v Speaker 1>buddy man. You got it all right. Let's get to this.

0:26:21.880 --> 0:26:24.239
<v Speaker 1>One of my favorite things that we've always done here

0:26:24.280 --> 0:26:27.119
<v Speaker 1>on the Draft Show. We'll do a little Twitter on

0:26:27.240 --> 0:26:32.480
<v Speaker 1>the twenty. You like that, Huh, Yeah, it's my thing.

0:26:32.800 --> 0:26:36.040
<v Speaker 1>It is thanks to ed Ka Hill and those for

0:26:36.680 --> 0:26:40.280
<v Speaker 1>helping create all that whole thing. All right, this question

0:26:40.440 --> 0:26:44.880
<v Speaker 1>comes from Live free Today and don't worry about tomorrow. Okay,

0:26:45.160 --> 0:26:49.400
<v Speaker 1>live free today, don't worry about tomorrow. If someone fall

0:26:49.440 --> 0:26:52.879
<v Speaker 1>to twenty six, would you draft them, say, like a

0:26:53.080 --> 0:26:59.240
<v Speaker 1>Will Levis quarterback from Kentucky, I'm gonna fight. I'm gonna

0:26:59.240 --> 0:27:05.240
<v Speaker 1>be punching air a quarterback. That's absolutely not And it's

0:27:05.240 --> 0:27:09.200
<v Speaker 1>not just because I'm the biggest Dak Prescott proponent this

0:27:09.280 --> 0:27:14.200
<v Speaker 1>side of Starksville. It's the fact that, again we talk

0:27:14.240 --> 0:27:18.879
<v Speaker 1>about the way you're using your resources. Pick twenty seven.

0:27:19.680 --> 0:27:22.359
<v Speaker 1>In twenty seventeen, the last first round player that the the

0:27:22.400 --> 0:27:24.199
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys have on the board was Dalvin Cook. It did

0:27:24.240 --> 0:27:26.000
<v Speaker 1>not matter to them. They weren't picking her running back

0:27:26.000 --> 0:27:28.520
<v Speaker 1>at twenty seven because they had Ezekiel Elliott here. It

0:27:28.600 --> 0:27:29.919
<v Speaker 1>just wasn't going to be the way that they were

0:27:29.920 --> 0:27:33.040
<v Speaker 1>going to use their resources. And so could they pick

0:27:33.080 --> 0:27:36.320
<v Speaker 1>a quarterback somewhere in the Maybe they get to the

0:27:36.359 --> 0:27:38.280
<v Speaker 1>second round and somebody's there. Maybe they get to the

0:27:38.280 --> 0:27:40.359
<v Speaker 1>third and they think somebody's there and go, this is

0:27:40.359 --> 0:27:41.840
<v Speaker 1>just too good a value for us to pass up.

0:27:41.880 --> 0:27:44.159
<v Speaker 1>On a Day two, maybe they would do something like that.

0:27:44.160 --> 0:27:46.040
<v Speaker 1>But even in the first round, I just I can't

0:27:46.080 --> 0:27:48.040
<v Speaker 1>see I think they would hold somebody hostage for that.

0:27:48.119 --> 0:27:49.520
<v Speaker 1>You want to come up to twenty six and get

0:27:49.600 --> 0:27:51.960
<v Speaker 1>let us come trade with us. That's dream scenario for me,

0:27:52.760 --> 0:27:54.320
<v Speaker 1>because then I think that you're going to be able

0:27:54.359 --> 0:27:55.879
<v Speaker 1>to move out of the first round. I think you

0:27:55.960 --> 0:27:57.520
<v Speaker 1>might be able to pick up a one for next

0:27:57.560 --> 0:28:00.240
<v Speaker 1>year and there's a team that wants skimp and you

0:28:00.240 --> 0:28:01.760
<v Speaker 1>go get that guy so they have a fifth year

0:28:01.760 --> 0:28:04.800
<v Speaker 1>option on them. Now, the question was would you do

0:28:04.840 --> 0:28:07.120
<v Speaker 1>this right? It wasn't what the Cowboys do this. Cowboys

0:28:07.119 --> 0:28:09.680
<v Speaker 1>aren't doing it. I would do this. I think Will

0:28:09.760 --> 0:28:11.800
<v Speaker 1>Levis is a player that I would I would gamble on.

0:28:12.960 --> 0:28:15.919
<v Speaker 1>And I got I got some doubts. What if your

0:28:16.000 --> 0:28:19.320
<v Speaker 1>quarterback is good and the quarterback is good, So what

0:28:19.359 --> 0:28:22.280
<v Speaker 1>are what are you doing? Uh? Maybe I'm trying to

0:28:22.280 --> 0:28:24.479
<v Speaker 1>find a great quarterback and not a good quarterback. And

0:28:24.520 --> 0:28:27.320
<v Speaker 1>if you're you're willing to take the gamble on Levis,

0:28:27.359 --> 0:28:30.240
<v Speaker 1>who is I think still raw? You're willing to take

0:28:30.280 --> 0:28:32.560
<v Speaker 1>that gamble knowing you have the most important position already

0:28:32.560 --> 0:28:34.960
<v Speaker 1>locked up and lots of other questions. But I could

0:28:34.960 --> 0:28:36.640
<v Speaker 1>still trying to win. In that win, I could maybe

0:28:36.960 --> 0:28:39.720
<v Speaker 1>try and improve on that quarterback right, And it's the

0:28:39.720 --> 0:28:43.040
<v Speaker 1>most valuable position in the sport. And if I hit

0:28:43.080 --> 0:28:45.520
<v Speaker 1>on it, and let's say, let's say Dak ends up

0:28:45.560 --> 0:28:48.280
<v Speaker 1>bawling out wins an MVP under the new McCarthy system,

0:28:48.280 --> 0:28:49.959
<v Speaker 1>and end up winning a super Bowl. Now I've got

0:28:50.000 --> 0:28:53.800
<v Speaker 1>a trade chip here, and what's what's your trade? Is

0:28:53.840 --> 0:28:57.040
<v Speaker 1>that not valuable to have the collateral Will Levis? And

0:28:57.120 --> 0:28:59.120
<v Speaker 1>now I can flip that I can getting low picks.

0:28:59.440 --> 0:29:01.320
<v Speaker 1>Turning left, here's the thing. I think if you drafted

0:29:01.320 --> 0:29:02.800
<v Speaker 1>a Will Levis and he never saw the field, the

0:29:02.800 --> 0:29:04.720
<v Speaker 1>most he could get back as a first And so

0:29:04.760 --> 0:29:07.000
<v Speaker 1>all you're doing is delayne having the access to the

0:29:07.000 --> 0:29:09.560
<v Speaker 1>player for two years and you don't get the benefit

0:29:09.680 --> 0:29:11.840
<v Speaker 1>of It's not like you're gonna get more than that.

0:29:11.840 --> 0:29:13.840
<v Speaker 1>By picking well of us, you're just penalizing yourself from

0:29:13.880 --> 0:29:15.440
<v Speaker 1>reaping the benefits of a first round. I think it's

0:29:15.440 --> 0:29:17.800
<v Speaker 1>a fun conversation to have. I wouldn't be opposed to

0:29:17.840 --> 0:29:20.320
<v Speaker 1>any I wouldn't be opposed to doing this, and especially

0:29:20.320 --> 0:29:22.320
<v Speaker 1>for a football team that doesn't seem like they're in

0:29:22.400 --> 0:29:25.040
<v Speaker 1>a position to really take a quarterback much. If you

0:29:25.080 --> 0:29:26.920
<v Speaker 1>have a guy that is a top ten talent that

0:29:26.960 --> 0:29:32.240
<v Speaker 1>falls into your lab and you don't consider that, I

0:29:32.240 --> 0:29:34.680
<v Speaker 1>think it's malpractice. Is he tapped in any other year,

0:29:35.440 --> 0:29:38.720
<v Speaker 1>in a different quarterback lass, next year, he would not

0:29:39.040 --> 0:29:43.840
<v Speaker 1>be talked about. Probably in the top he definitely, he

0:29:43.920 --> 0:29:47.560
<v Speaker 1>might be number three or four. I mean, it depends

0:29:47.560 --> 0:29:49.680
<v Speaker 1>on Hartman. Hartman might be ahead of him. I mean

0:29:49.680 --> 0:29:52.040
<v Speaker 1>he's not. He's not ahead of Williams or twenty seven

0:29:52.120 --> 0:29:55.400
<v Speaker 1>years old. A lot of these guys, a lot of

0:29:55.400 --> 0:29:57.959
<v Speaker 1>these guys are though because of the COVID, they all

0:29:58.000 --> 0:30:00.000
<v Speaker 1>they all gave him an next year. I mean, will

0:30:00.080 --> 0:30:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Levis to me one hundred percent is the number one

0:30:02.040 --> 0:30:04.360
<v Speaker 1>quarterback in last year's class. Like he's better than pick

0:30:04.400 --> 0:30:07.120
<v Speaker 1>it to me, and absolutely so. Yeah, he would have

0:30:07.240 --> 0:30:09.200
<v Speaker 1>nails his right tackles trying to get him murdered every

0:30:09.200 --> 0:30:11.000
<v Speaker 1>single play. He would have been number one last year.

0:30:11.000 --> 0:30:12.800
<v Speaker 1>And I like Levis, Like I think Levis is a

0:30:12.800 --> 0:30:16.840
<v Speaker 1>good player. It's just that's not the correct use of resources.

0:30:16.880 --> 0:30:20.440
<v Speaker 1>And when you look at taking somebody like Levis, while

0:30:20.480 --> 0:30:22.240
<v Speaker 1>you say you could get better, you could be great

0:30:22.280 --> 0:30:26.280
<v Speaker 1>at the position, right, How how long until a player

0:30:26.280 --> 0:30:29.280
<v Speaker 1>like will Levis do you think is legitimately passing Dack

0:30:29.360 --> 0:30:31.320
<v Speaker 1>if he's going to if he if you say Will

0:30:31.400 --> 0:30:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Levis is going to be a better quarterback than Dak

0:30:33.000 --> 0:30:34.880
<v Speaker 1>Prescott one day, Okay, how long is that going to be?

0:30:35.160 --> 0:30:37.440
<v Speaker 1>It's two years he sits, so it would be the

0:30:37.480 --> 0:30:42.240
<v Speaker 1>third year. So that's a long time to wait on

0:30:42.280 --> 0:30:44.880
<v Speaker 1>a chip that's you're not even evaluating it. Probably you're

0:30:44.920 --> 0:30:48.400
<v Speaker 1>not buying into the brock Purty syndrome. Well, the veteran

0:30:48.440 --> 0:30:50.600
<v Speaker 1>quarterback that's played a lot of snaps. Oh, there has

0:30:50.640 --> 0:30:52.000
<v Speaker 1>been a I don't know if you saw the same

0:30:52.080 --> 0:30:55.000
<v Speaker 1>article I did. The Sports Illustrated had an article that

0:30:55.040 --> 0:30:57.800
<v Speaker 1>was really great this week from Connor Or that talked

0:30:57.800 --> 0:31:00.800
<v Speaker 1>about the brock Purty effect. That there're people using this

0:31:00.920 --> 0:31:05.120
<v Speaker 1>term around the league right now that typically guys that

0:31:05.280 --> 0:31:07.120
<v Speaker 1>play a lot of snaps, the more film you put

0:31:07.160 --> 0:31:09.520
<v Speaker 1>on tape, the more you give them the nitpick at quarterback,

0:31:09.920 --> 0:31:11.560
<v Speaker 1>and that in the past that's been a ding for

0:31:11.600 --> 0:31:13.600
<v Speaker 1>them and they'll take the chance on a Trey Lance

0:31:13.600 --> 0:31:16.160
<v Speaker 1>who has a little bit of tape over the other stuff,

0:31:16.360 --> 0:31:18.280
<v Speaker 1>and that purty has maybe changed the view for some

0:31:18.320 --> 0:31:23.520
<v Speaker 1>people on Hendon Hooker, on Max dug On whoever else,

0:31:23.640 --> 0:31:26.320
<v Speaker 1>And so you know that that's something that could end

0:31:26.320 --> 0:31:28.760
<v Speaker 1>out benefiting them, could benefit Malie Cunningham, guys like this,

0:31:28.840 --> 0:31:32.600
<v Speaker 1>and so I think it's interesting. I think Will Levis

0:31:32.680 --> 0:31:35.240
<v Speaker 1>is a good player. I think it is when you

0:31:35.280 --> 0:31:38.000
<v Speaker 1>say mal practice, I think mal practice is taking the quarterball.

0:31:38.040 --> 0:31:39.680
<v Speaker 1>And again I don't think they would. But if you're

0:31:39.720 --> 0:31:42.040
<v Speaker 1>not having that conversation, what are you doing? It's the

0:31:42.040 --> 0:31:45.640
<v Speaker 1>most important position and you you haven't been able to

0:31:45.680 --> 0:31:49.400
<v Speaker 1>get the drive from your guy two years in a row,

0:31:49.600 --> 0:31:52.200
<v Speaker 1>three minutes left, go get it? How bad guy hadn't

0:31:52.240 --> 0:31:55.640
<v Speaker 1>done it? Bobby. There were conversations on this exact show

0:31:56.360 --> 0:31:59.560
<v Speaker 1>about would you trade Dak Prescott for the chance to

0:31:59.640 --> 0:32:02.680
<v Speaker 1>draft Baker Mayfield? And unanimously but it's like yeah, absolutely,

0:32:02.680 --> 0:32:05.600
<v Speaker 1>It's like, okay, burden the hand versus two in the bush.

0:32:05.760 --> 0:32:08.320
<v Speaker 1>You've got an issue there where if you would have

0:32:08.320 --> 0:32:10.600
<v Speaker 1>made that deal when people were arguing for that deal,

0:32:10.680 --> 0:32:12.440
<v Speaker 1>like yeah, I would do that in the heartbeat. You

0:32:12.520 --> 0:32:14.280
<v Speaker 1>know how far back this franchise would have gotten set

0:32:14.320 --> 0:32:16.000
<v Speaker 1>if you've done that deal, same sort of thing you

0:32:16.040 --> 0:32:18.400
<v Speaker 1>are risking setting your franchise back taking a quarterback in

0:32:18.480 --> 0:32:22.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty set. You absolutely are, and then the conversation, Lordy,

0:32:22.840 --> 0:32:25.680
<v Speaker 1>risk versus reward. Don't nobody want to hear that? Nobody,

0:32:25.760 --> 0:32:28.320
<v Speaker 1>I personally don't want to hear about Oh the drama

0:32:28.360 --> 0:32:31.040
<v Speaker 1>that comes with that. I mean, like, we just want

0:32:31.040 --> 0:32:34.560
<v Speaker 1>to watch football like the ruckas it would cause would

0:32:34.560 --> 0:32:38.200
<v Speaker 1>just drive itself. It don't matter what quarterback they draft

0:32:38.280 --> 0:32:40.520
<v Speaker 1>or when they draft a quarterback, it's gonna bring up

0:32:40.520 --> 0:32:43.480
<v Speaker 1>conversations first round. Yeah, it's gonna be the talk of

0:32:43.520 --> 0:32:45.240
<v Speaker 1>the town for the first two months, and we just

0:32:45.280 --> 0:32:47.560
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about all the other plays. Again, I'm

0:32:47.560 --> 0:32:49.680
<v Speaker 1>moving out of that spot. I'm letting somebody else come

0:32:49.720 --> 0:32:51.520
<v Speaker 1>up so I can get an extra one. Okay. That

0:32:51.880 --> 0:32:57.240
<v Speaker 1>leads me to this question from Eric Ichorn, and Eric said, Okay,

0:32:57.320 --> 0:32:59.920
<v Speaker 1>he's asking what players would have to be off the

0:33:00.120 --> 0:33:02.480
<v Speaker 1>board at twenty six in order for you to feel

0:33:02.520 --> 0:33:05.560
<v Speaker 1>that the Cowboys have been wiped out and would start

0:33:05.600 --> 0:33:09.040
<v Speaker 1>to think about dropping back. Now, we all talked about

0:33:09.120 --> 0:33:13.440
<v Speaker 1>players that we would take potentially at twenty six, But okay,

0:33:13.520 --> 0:33:16.360
<v Speaker 1>our guys are starting not to be on that board.

0:33:16.880 --> 0:33:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Are we interested in blowing the hatches on this thing

0:33:20.040 --> 0:33:22.880
<v Speaker 1>and dive into the bottom. Or are we well, we

0:33:23.040 --> 0:33:25.360
<v Speaker 1>just gonna stand in there and just trust the board

0:33:25.400 --> 0:33:27.360
<v Speaker 1>and make the pick of whoever's on that board. I

0:33:27.400 --> 0:33:30.800
<v Speaker 1>think you trust the board just because you need. I

0:33:31.000 --> 0:33:34.080
<v Speaker 1>ain't gonna say you need. There's plenty of positions that

0:33:34.120 --> 0:33:37.200
<v Speaker 1>you could get better from, like and make your team better.

0:33:37.520 --> 0:33:39.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean specifically the offense, like I guess you want

0:33:39.640 --> 0:33:41.400
<v Speaker 1>to talk about, but like, if they took a good

0:33:41.480 --> 0:33:44.160
<v Speaker 1>DT at twenty six, I wouldn't be mad they took

0:33:44.200 --> 0:33:46.400
<v Speaker 1>receiver at twenty six. I wouldn't be mad to took

0:33:46.440 --> 0:33:48.440
<v Speaker 1>a good tight end at twenty six. I wouldn't be mad.

0:33:48.800 --> 0:33:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Like if they took a good guard at twenty six,

0:33:50.960 --> 0:33:53.120
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't be mad. Like is that how y'all feel?

0:33:53.240 --> 0:33:57.160
<v Speaker 1>Or do y'all like it? It matters, So I guess

0:33:57.200 --> 0:33:59.120
<v Speaker 1>the best way to just probably just limit it to

0:33:59.200 --> 0:34:01.600
<v Speaker 1>positions to think. I think, if the guys that you

0:34:01.640 --> 0:34:05.000
<v Speaker 1>were fighting for are no longer on that board, does

0:34:05.000 --> 0:34:07.320
<v Speaker 1>it does it make you want to bail? Yes? I

0:34:07.320 --> 0:34:08.920
<v Speaker 1>mean that makes me want to bail every time I

0:34:08.920 --> 0:34:10.640
<v Speaker 1>want to bail it. If then, if the right players

0:34:10.640 --> 0:34:12.360
<v Speaker 1>are out there, I guess it just comes down to, like, okay,

0:34:12.480 --> 0:34:14.560
<v Speaker 1>so tackle a position running back who would have to

0:34:14.640 --> 0:34:15.759
<v Speaker 1>be off the board for me to feel like I

0:34:15.800 --> 0:34:17.680
<v Speaker 1>was wiped out at running back? A right Bijon Robinson

0:34:17.680 --> 0:34:19.040
<v Speaker 1>would have to be off the board. Yeah, I'm not

0:34:19.040 --> 0:34:21.600
<v Speaker 1>taking Gibbs at twenty six. I'm not either. I'm and

0:34:21.680 --> 0:34:23.359
<v Speaker 1>I like Gibbs. It's just I'm not gonna go there

0:34:23.360 --> 0:34:25.400
<v Speaker 1>for the way you two or cowards because I like

0:34:25.520 --> 0:34:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Zach Charbonnay that I could take in the second round,

0:34:27.600 --> 0:34:30.279
<v Speaker 1>or Taija Spears, who's an absolute beast. I talked about

0:34:30.400 --> 0:34:35.120
<v Speaker 1>how damn good Gibbs is. Yeah, but I said, how

0:34:35.200 --> 0:34:37.120
<v Speaker 1>you're back, How you're back? He's my RB two. I

0:34:37.160 --> 0:34:39.440
<v Speaker 1>got charbonnais my RB three, and I think Charbonnai is.

0:34:39.440 --> 0:34:41.880
<v Speaker 1>But you wouldn't take him pretty close already in the

0:34:41.920 --> 0:34:44.840
<v Speaker 1>second round almost you wouldn't take him. You really wouldn't

0:34:44.840 --> 0:34:46.719
<v Speaker 1>take it, would you. I don't know that I'm taking

0:34:46.800 --> 0:34:48.359
<v Speaker 1>him with twenty six. I'd rather do you got him

0:34:48.360 --> 0:34:50.560
<v Speaker 1>at your second best back? I know, but I'd think

0:34:50.600 --> 0:34:53.320
<v Speaker 1>I'd rather go ahead and trade back and go ahead

0:34:53.280 --> 0:34:57.120
<v Speaker 1>and get some extra jar backpital how far back? Great?

0:34:57.120 --> 0:34:58.520
<v Speaker 1>You want to go back to thirty one and hold

0:34:58.560 --> 0:35:00.600
<v Speaker 1>that fifth year option, or you want to go into

0:35:00.600 --> 0:35:02.120
<v Speaker 1>the early second. I'm a running back, but I need

0:35:02.120 --> 0:35:04.080
<v Speaker 1>the fifth year option. I think get running back is

0:35:04.080 --> 0:35:05.800
<v Speaker 1>where you most need the fift year option. I don't know.

0:35:05.840 --> 0:35:07.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that I have that. That's where you

0:35:07.080 --> 0:35:08.840
<v Speaker 1>get the most value out of it. I think I

0:35:09.160 --> 0:35:10.279
<v Speaker 1>hear you there, but I don't know that I have

0:35:10.360 --> 0:35:12.720
<v Speaker 1>to have it. Bijan Robinson it running back. The receivers

0:35:12.719 --> 0:35:13.840
<v Speaker 1>who would have to be off the board from me

0:35:13.920 --> 0:35:16.600
<v Speaker 1>would be Johnston, Addison, Smith and Jick. But the tight

0:35:16.680 --> 0:35:17.759
<v Speaker 1>ends would have to be on the off the board

0:35:17.800 --> 0:35:23.000
<v Speaker 1>would be Musgrave and kincaid Um all corners, I mean,

0:35:23.040 --> 0:35:30.480
<v Speaker 1>you'd have to have Gonzala, Poor, Witherspoon, Gonzalez, Cam Smith, Banks,

0:35:31.040 --> 0:35:34.000
<v Speaker 1>those are the corners. That about Forbes, I got on again.

0:35:34.640 --> 0:35:37.320
<v Speaker 1>The size thing is very alarming. Time. I'd still Forbes

0:35:37.480 --> 0:35:40.520
<v Speaker 1>is Forbes. I love Forbes, but man, he's one hundred

0:35:40.560 --> 0:35:42.960
<v Speaker 1>and sixty six pounds. I'm sorry, but you know what.

0:35:43.040 --> 0:35:44.759
<v Speaker 1>To be fair, I don't mean to be that guy,

0:35:44.840 --> 0:35:47.360
<v Speaker 1>but I am that that guy played in the SEC

0:35:47.560 --> 0:35:50.440
<v Speaker 1>played bigger, he played a high level and in the

0:35:50.560 --> 0:35:56.919
<v Speaker 1>size one and issue there it was, Hey, I'm I'm

0:35:56.960 --> 0:35:59.440
<v Speaker 1>team Forbes. Look to be fair. Uh yeah, he's a

0:35:59.400 --> 0:36:01.279
<v Speaker 1>one hundred six pounds and there's a whole bunch of

0:36:01.320 --> 0:36:03.160
<v Speaker 1>receivers coming to this class that are one seventy three

0:36:03.160 --> 0:36:04.920
<v Speaker 1>and one seventy eight, and like, I mean, so, I

0:36:04.920 --> 0:36:07.399
<v Speaker 1>mean there's there's plenty of I mean, you're talking about

0:36:07.400 --> 0:36:10.280
<v Speaker 1>putting Forbes on DeVante Smith, who's one hundred and twelve pounds,

0:36:10.320 --> 0:36:13.759
<v Speaker 1>dripping wet, and so I mean, I think we need

0:36:13.800 --> 0:36:15.719
<v Speaker 1>to rethink the weight stuff. That would be that that

0:36:15.760 --> 0:36:18.600
<v Speaker 1>would be the argument you could you could probably for me,

0:36:18.640 --> 0:36:20.799
<v Speaker 1>I have a lot of history with this. That would

0:36:20.800 --> 0:36:24.000
<v Speaker 1>be the argument you could make, would be, look there,

0:36:24.040 --> 0:36:26.359
<v Speaker 1>these receivers are getting smaller too. This isn't Yeah, I'm

0:36:26.400 --> 0:36:27.960
<v Speaker 1>interested looking. I need to look that up. I want

0:36:28.000 --> 0:36:29.719
<v Speaker 1>to see what the if you go back over the

0:36:29.800 --> 0:36:31.359
<v Speaker 1>last twenty years, I want to see each five year

0:36:31.440 --> 0:36:33.120
<v Speaker 1>trend of what the average weight of the receivers and

0:36:33.160 --> 0:36:36.000
<v Speaker 1>if they're going down. But that would be the arguing form.

0:36:36.040 --> 0:36:39.200
<v Speaker 1>But still, as athletic as he is, as good a

0:36:39.200 --> 0:36:41.880
<v Speaker 1>player as he is, one hundred and sixty six pound

0:36:41.920 --> 0:36:45.759
<v Speaker 1>corner is terrifying to me. What about Briane. What about

0:36:45.800 --> 0:36:50.319
<v Speaker 1>Brian Branch from Alabama? I think he's tiny. I'm not

0:36:50.320 --> 0:36:54.360
<v Speaker 1>taking I'm not taking any he's I like the player,

0:36:54.400 --> 0:36:57.160
<v Speaker 1>but he looked small. I'm asking, is there any safety

0:36:57.200 --> 0:37:00.239
<v Speaker 1>that you're okay what you're in the first round? I don't.

0:37:00.239 --> 0:37:02.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't have I don't have first branches in a safety.

0:37:02.600 --> 0:37:07.040
<v Speaker 1>To me, Branch is a corner. Um, yeah, I don't

0:37:07.040 --> 0:37:08.480
<v Speaker 1>have a safety in the first round. There wouldn't be

0:37:08.520 --> 0:37:10.680
<v Speaker 1>a safety. Okay, let me ask you this then, the

0:37:10.719 --> 0:37:13.799
<v Speaker 1>way we're talking right now, we don't feel like we

0:37:13.840 --> 0:37:16.479
<v Speaker 1>can get wiped out. I just said, no, there's gonna

0:37:16.480 --> 0:37:18.520
<v Speaker 1>be I'm sorry, I'm sorry. Well no, I mean, and

0:37:18.640 --> 0:37:21.000
<v Speaker 1>I was trying to say that is they like was

0:37:21.080 --> 0:37:24.600
<v Speaker 1>wiped out to them because they have a lot of options, Yes,

0:37:24.760 --> 0:37:27.120
<v Speaker 1>they have so good We're okay, you're not. We're not

0:37:27.160 --> 0:37:29.080
<v Speaker 1>going to bail then, because you guys feel like that

0:37:29.160 --> 0:37:31.000
<v Speaker 1>we got options there to pull, I don't. I don't.

0:37:31.040 --> 0:37:33.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, because I mean, there have been let's

0:37:33.960 --> 0:37:37.319
<v Speaker 1>look back over the past in recent years. Um, you know,

0:37:37.480 --> 0:37:39.919
<v Speaker 1>I think there have been three four years in a row,

0:37:39.960 --> 0:37:41.759
<v Speaker 1>and obviously CD was a different scenario. But I think

0:37:41.800 --> 0:37:44.240
<v Speaker 1>there have been a few years. Twenty seventeen. I remember

0:37:44.239 --> 0:37:47.080
<v Speaker 1>the chatter was there's no way you're completely wiped out

0:37:47.120 --> 0:37:49.560
<v Speaker 1>on the edge rushers, and technically they weren't. T J.

0:37:49.680 --> 0:37:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Watt was there, but like, you know, there's no way

0:37:52.200 --> 0:37:53.680
<v Speaker 1>you're wiped out in the edge rushers. And then we

0:37:53.680 --> 0:37:56.160
<v Speaker 1>saw a bunch of them, McKinley, Charles Harris, a bunch

0:37:56.160 --> 0:37:58.160
<v Speaker 1>of them went right leading up to you. You had

0:37:58.280 --> 0:38:00.840
<v Speaker 1>the when they were picking. Then they traded down to

0:38:00.840 --> 0:38:03.840
<v Speaker 1>twelve to pick Mica, where three picks to you, and

0:38:03.880 --> 0:38:06.240
<v Speaker 1>the players left on the board were sul Horn and Certan,

0:38:06.320 --> 0:38:08.200
<v Speaker 1>and you're like, one of these guys, one of these

0:38:08.600 --> 0:38:10.560
<v Speaker 1>might be able to sneak here, and then three boom boom,

0:38:10.560 --> 0:38:12.759
<v Speaker 1>boo boom they go right no row And you know,

0:38:12.880 --> 0:38:15.680
<v Speaker 1>same sort of thing last year where we were sitting

0:38:15.719 --> 0:38:18.400
<v Speaker 1>there watching and going, you know, could this guy slide down,

0:38:18.440 --> 0:38:20.719
<v Speaker 1>could this like like like okay Penning could get here,

0:38:21.440 --> 0:38:23.840
<v Speaker 1>you could get trailing Burkes to you, somebody's going to

0:38:23.880 --> 0:38:26.480
<v Speaker 1>be there, Zion Johnson, and then boom, boom boom they

0:38:26.520 --> 0:38:29.359
<v Speaker 1>go down. And so I like to think maybe out

0:38:29.400 --> 0:38:31.640
<v Speaker 1>of the players I listed at corner and those other positions.

0:38:31.920 --> 0:38:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Maybe they one or two of them I would like

0:38:34.239 --> 0:38:36.040
<v Speaker 1>to think would be there. But I've seen a history

0:38:36.040 --> 0:38:37.880
<v Speaker 1>now of several years of me thinking one or two

0:38:37.880 --> 0:38:39.359
<v Speaker 1>of them gets there, and then they don't. Yeah, because

0:38:39.360 --> 0:38:41.080
<v Speaker 1>they're the run on a sea we got. If you're

0:38:41.080 --> 0:38:44.640
<v Speaker 1>watching on the video right now, we got Brian Branch

0:38:44.760 --> 0:38:47.439
<v Speaker 1>up there from Alabama. Alabama's got three safe boys. Branch

0:38:47.520 --> 0:38:49.879
<v Speaker 1>did not test. Well, That's what I'm saying though. That's

0:38:49.880 --> 0:38:52.040
<v Speaker 1>what I like him. I like to I would take

0:38:52.080 --> 0:38:53.759
<v Speaker 1>him if he's there. See, that's the thing. I'm going

0:38:53.800 --> 0:38:56.080
<v Speaker 1>to Tuscaloose, So I'm getting him faster, I'm getting him

0:38:56.440 --> 0:38:58.319
<v Speaker 1>better jumps. I'm doing whatever I have to. If I

0:38:58.360 --> 0:39:00.239
<v Speaker 1>like the player that much, I'm gonna do that. I'm

0:39:00.280 --> 0:39:02.680
<v Speaker 1>only saying because if you're talking about I think this

0:39:02.719 --> 0:39:05.319
<v Speaker 1>guy plays better close to the lot of scrimmage, I

0:39:05.320 --> 0:39:08.000
<v Speaker 1>think you're absolutely right about to be in the box

0:39:08.040 --> 0:39:11.319
<v Speaker 1>downhill player. Yeah. Absolutely, And he doesn't miss tackles like that.

0:39:11.400 --> 0:39:14.560
<v Speaker 1>And if you are talking about there's conversation with Donovan

0:39:14.600 --> 0:39:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Wilson or whatever, if you are trying to replace that,

0:39:18.200 --> 0:39:20.760
<v Speaker 1>he does so much. Dude, Like I know that people

0:39:20.800 --> 0:39:23.200
<v Speaker 1>think it's a quick thing like, oh yeah, you can

0:39:23.239 --> 0:39:26.239
<v Speaker 1>find another Donovan, but like he's so active, he does

0:39:26.280 --> 0:39:28.759
<v Speaker 1>so much for your run game. I just feel like

0:39:28.800 --> 0:39:30.640
<v Speaker 1>if you are gonna get somebody to replace him, and

0:39:30.719 --> 0:39:32.840
<v Speaker 1>needs to be somebody that is okay playing close to

0:39:32.880 --> 0:39:36.239
<v Speaker 1>the lot of scrimmage Branch Branch has. Branch is not

0:39:36.280 --> 0:39:39.319
<v Speaker 1>the most skilled player across the board. I think out

0:39:39.320 --> 0:39:42.120
<v Speaker 1>of the first round type of players, there's an argument

0:39:42.160 --> 0:39:44.240
<v Speaker 1>I think you could make that Branch has the fewest

0:39:44.239 --> 0:39:46.560
<v Speaker 1>holes in his game for the position of like the

0:39:46.760 --> 0:39:49.480
<v Speaker 1>players in the first round period, like any position anywhere.

0:39:49.680 --> 0:39:52.040
<v Speaker 1>I think that Branch is the most solid across the

0:39:52.080 --> 0:39:53.560
<v Speaker 1>board in terms of there's not a whole bunch of

0:39:53.560 --> 0:39:56.960
<v Speaker 1>glaring issues with Brian Branch to me, let me see

0:39:57.320 --> 0:39:59.359
<v Speaker 1>A that's a good point. I was kind of thinking

0:39:59.360 --> 0:40:01.800
<v Speaker 1>of the guys I was looking. I think Robertson's that

0:40:01.920 --> 0:40:04.799
<v Speaker 1>guy for me, you know, yeah, I'm you know the

0:40:04.840 --> 0:40:08.480
<v Speaker 1>whole thing too with Porter Gonzalez, Witherspoon, those guys I

0:40:08.600 --> 0:40:11.400
<v Speaker 1>need to those corners. I think I got them in

0:40:11.440 --> 0:40:13.960
<v Speaker 1>the right order there. I think I do. I like

0:40:14.040 --> 0:40:16.680
<v Speaker 1>wither Spelling. All right, Well, listen, thanks to everybody who

0:40:16.800 --> 0:40:20.440
<v Speaker 1>fired their questions in for Twitter on the twenty Today,

0:40:21.080 --> 0:40:23.840
<v Speaker 1>when we return, we're gonna do a little drafting for

0:40:23.880 --> 0:40:26.560
<v Speaker 1>the NFC East. We'll do that next on the Draft Show.

0:40:28.480 --> 0:40:31.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm Dak Prescott, quarterback of the Dallas Cowboys. Blockchain dot

0:40:31.760 --> 0:40:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Com is one of the most trusted ways to buy, sell,

0:40:34.120 --> 0:40:36.799
<v Speaker 1>and trade crypto. Whether you're always on the go or

0:40:36.800 --> 0:40:39.360
<v Speaker 1>stay closer to home, blockchain dot com is just a

0:40:39.400 --> 0:40:42.400
<v Speaker 1>few taps away put the power of crypto in your pocket,

0:40:42.440 --> 0:40:44.239
<v Speaker 1>so no matter where you are, you can trade on

0:40:44.239 --> 0:40:47.240
<v Speaker 1>your terms and build a crypto portfolio to fit your life.

0:40:47.360 --> 0:40:50.759
<v Speaker 1>For crypto pros, rookies, and anyone in between, blockchain dot

0:40:50.840 --> 0:40:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Com makes it easy to own a piece of the future.

0:40:53.239 --> 0:40:56.799
<v Speaker 1>Blockchain dot Com trusted by millions, trusted by America's team.

0:40:56.960 --> 0:41:00.759
<v Speaker 1>In a stressful world, Lincoln provides balance and amidst the

0:41:00.880 --> 0:41:04.640
<v Speaker 1>chaos by creating sanctuaries that move you through the world

0:41:04.680 --> 0:41:07.799
<v Speaker 1>with ease. Our vehicles make your time richer and more

0:41:07.920 --> 0:41:13.160
<v Speaker 1>uplifting with human centric design, intelligent technology, and powerful performance.

0:41:13.360 --> 0:41:16.640
<v Speaker 1>As the official luxury vehicle of the Dallas Cowboys, Driving

0:41:16.640 --> 0:41:20.320
<v Speaker 1>and Lincoln is just another way to show your team pride. Experience.

0:41:20.360 --> 0:41:24.920
<v Speaker 1>Our full lineup of luxury vehicles, including the Corsair, Aviator, Navigator,

0:41:24.960 --> 0:41:28.359
<v Speaker 1>and Nautilus at Lincoln dot com. What do you call

0:41:28.440 --> 0:41:30.680
<v Speaker 1>a group of grown men and women with their faces

0:41:30.719 --> 0:41:33.560
<v Speaker 1>painted silver and blue who get together every week to

0:41:33.600 --> 0:41:36.640
<v Speaker 1>share a three hour long ritual of jumping, sinking, and

0:41:36.719 --> 0:41:39.960
<v Speaker 1>toasting Miller light and Tim Gallant hats while yelling how

0:41:39.960 --> 0:41:44.480
<v Speaker 1>about them Cowboys? You call it Miller Time in Dallas.

0:41:47.040 --> 0:41:50.280
<v Speaker 1>Here's to the Cowboys, Here's to the original light beer.

0:41:50.600 --> 0:41:54.839
<v Speaker 1>It's Miller Time. Celebrate Responsibly. Twenty twenty one. Miller Brewing

0:41:54.920 --> 0:41:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Company for Orts Texas. Star Sports Tours is the only

0:41:58.520 --> 0:42:02.359
<v Speaker 1>official fan travel partner of the Dallas Cowboys, offering exclusive

0:42:02.520 --> 0:42:07.000
<v Speaker 1>game weekend travel packages with pregame, sideline access and photo

0:42:07.000 --> 0:42:10.920
<v Speaker 1>ops with current players, cheerleaders and Cowboy legends. I want

0:42:10.960 --> 0:42:13.399
<v Speaker 1>to stay at the Team Hotel, attend the best Tell

0:42:13.480 --> 0:42:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Gay Party in Texas two of the Star and talk

0:42:16.560 --> 0:42:20.640
<v Speaker 1>exs and olds with me Everson Walls. With Star Sports Tours,

0:42:20.680 --> 0:42:24.480
<v Speaker 1>you can visit Cowboys Travel dot com to book your

0:42:24.480 --> 0:42:30.960
<v Speaker 1>travel package. Today is the Dallas Cowboys dot Com Draft Show.

0:42:36.680 --> 0:42:39.799
<v Speaker 1>We're back here with the Draft Show, presented by Miller Life.

0:42:39.800 --> 0:42:41.960
<v Speaker 1>The only beard of the Dallas Cowboys. It's Miller time.

0:42:42.480 --> 0:42:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Also want to alert you guys, h we got the

0:42:46.320 --> 0:42:50.759
<v Speaker 1>ACMs coming up, the American Country Music Awards. I was like,

0:42:50.880 --> 0:42:53.160
<v Speaker 1>what's that, y'all? Yeah, y'all, I gotta tell me. This

0:42:53.239 --> 0:42:55.239
<v Speaker 1>is this is how we country. It's here at the

0:42:55.239 --> 0:42:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Star Country Music Party of the Years coming to the

0:42:57.960 --> 0:43:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Ford Center. The Star at Frisco. The Academy of Country

0:43:01.840 --> 0:43:04.760
<v Speaker 1>Music Awards are always bring you the country music's brightest

0:43:04.760 --> 0:43:07.640
<v Speaker 1>stars together under one roof. And no one does country

0:43:07.719 --> 0:43:11.920
<v Speaker 1>like Texas witness History on May eleventh. Get your tickets

0:43:11.960 --> 0:43:16.399
<v Speaker 1>at SeatGeek dot com. Thank you everybody for hanging out

0:43:16.400 --> 0:43:19.319
<v Speaker 1>with us here. We're in the final segment of the

0:43:19.440 --> 0:43:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Draft show. We're gonna do a little draft and for

0:43:21.960 --> 0:43:27.040
<v Speaker 1>the NFC East here. And what I've done is I've

0:43:27.080 --> 0:43:30.319
<v Speaker 1>taken the team and we're gonna go in the order

0:43:30.360 --> 0:43:32.600
<v Speaker 1>of how they pick. So the Philadelphia Eagles will be

0:43:32.600 --> 0:43:35.640
<v Speaker 1>the first on the clock at number ten. The Washington

0:43:35.640 --> 0:43:38.279
<v Speaker 1>Commanders will be then on the clock at sixteen, Your

0:43:38.520 --> 0:43:40.400
<v Speaker 1>New York Football Giants will be on the clock at

0:43:40.400 --> 0:43:42.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty five, and your Dallas Cowboys to be on the

0:43:42.040 --> 0:43:45.319
<v Speaker 1>clock at twenty six. So we will start with the

0:43:45.560 --> 0:43:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Philadelphia Eagles. Philadelphia Eagles team needs cornerback, running back, safety, linebacker,

0:43:54.680 --> 0:43:58.640
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver. I'm gonna give you a choice. The Eagles

0:43:58.640 --> 0:44:02.160
<v Speaker 1>can either draft Joey Poor or cornerback at a Penn State,

0:44:02.800 --> 0:44:06.000
<v Speaker 1>or they can trap Bijean Robinson running back out of Texas.

0:44:07.520 --> 0:44:12.080
<v Speaker 1>They can't say, hurt off feelings. What Okay, it's not,

0:44:11.880 --> 0:44:14.080
<v Speaker 1>it's not, it's not. You guys discuss it. You guys,

0:44:14.080 --> 0:44:16.880
<v Speaker 1>discuss it. Discuss it. Yeah, you guys discuss it and

0:44:16.920 --> 0:44:19.080
<v Speaker 1>tell me who you think the best pick for the

0:44:19.080 --> 0:44:21.200
<v Speaker 1>Philadelphia Goles. And I agree with you. They're gonna They're

0:44:21.200 --> 0:44:23.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna break your heart one way or another. One of

0:44:23.160 --> 0:44:25.799
<v Speaker 1>these players. They see the buzz, they see the buzz.

0:44:25.960 --> 0:44:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Better player Bijean and undoubtedly best player to me, still

0:44:31.000 --> 0:44:33.280
<v Speaker 1>the best player I've ranked in the draft. Yeah, Bijean

0:44:33.360 --> 0:44:36.720
<v Speaker 1>is the better player between the two, better position value,

0:44:37.880 --> 0:44:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Porter corner. I think I think Porter is the best

0:44:40.120 --> 0:44:43.520
<v Speaker 1>corner in the draft. If I what I would argue

0:44:43.600 --> 0:44:45.839
<v Speaker 1>for if I was Philadelphia and we're looking at Okay,

0:44:45.840 --> 0:44:48.799
<v Speaker 1>we got Porter and Bijean Robinson here, how cute do

0:44:48.840 --> 0:44:51.400
<v Speaker 1>we want to get? Oh? Yeah, because That's the question,

0:44:51.480 --> 0:44:53.200
<v Speaker 1>is that are your windows? They get another they get

0:44:53.239 --> 0:44:55.719
<v Speaker 1>another pick. You've got another pick at thirty, And I say,

0:44:56.760 --> 0:44:58.440
<v Speaker 1>just if if I'm kicking this around, I go, look,

0:44:58.480 --> 0:44:59.959
<v Speaker 1>we need to address corner and we need to addres

0:45:00.040 --> 0:45:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Us running back. Which do I feel better about? Do

0:45:02.760 --> 0:45:07.279
<v Speaker 1>I feel better about taking Bijon Robinson now and then

0:45:07.320 --> 0:45:11.200
<v Speaker 1>taking Kaylee Ringo at thirty? Okay? Do I feel better

0:45:11.239 --> 0:45:13.480
<v Speaker 1>about Porter now and Gibbs at thirty? I feel better

0:45:13.480 --> 0:45:16.080
<v Speaker 1>about Porter and gives real quick. This is I've based

0:45:16.080 --> 0:45:19.479
<v Speaker 1>this off Dane Burglar's mock draft, and so I'm giving

0:45:19.520 --> 0:45:22.440
<v Speaker 1>you players like if you wanted Gonzalez or Witherspoon or

0:45:22.440 --> 0:45:25.080
<v Speaker 1>one of those, they're gone. So I'm giving you players

0:45:25.080 --> 0:45:28.520
<v Speaker 1>that are available to you you can talk about, because

0:45:28.560 --> 0:45:31.520
<v Speaker 1>Gonzalez was already gone for a corner or This is

0:45:31.520 --> 0:45:33.960
<v Speaker 1>off Dane Burglar's mock draft. And I think for Philly,

0:45:34.000 --> 0:45:37.840
<v Speaker 1>we just saw the impact that having a legit corner

0:45:37.960 --> 0:45:40.640
<v Speaker 1>opposite Sleigh and what it meant for their defense and

0:45:40.640 --> 0:45:43.000
<v Speaker 1>they might lose Bradberry well and then but at the

0:45:43.040 --> 0:45:46.640
<v Speaker 1>same token, I feel like that we also saw how

0:45:46.760 --> 0:45:50.520
<v Speaker 1>having the ball in your quarterbacks hands hurt you towards

0:45:50.560 --> 0:45:52.359
<v Speaker 1>the end of the season because he was banged up,

0:45:52.719 --> 0:45:55.040
<v Speaker 1>and so maybe they are going into this next season

0:45:55.080 --> 0:45:57.279
<v Speaker 1>saying we want to take the ball out of his

0:45:57.320 --> 0:45:59.560
<v Speaker 1>hands a little bit more. We want a more dynamic

0:45:59.680 --> 0:46:02.600
<v Speaker 1>run game, and they've done it by committee. But being

0:46:02.600 --> 0:46:04.880
<v Speaker 1>down at the combine, it didn't sound like Miles Sanders

0:46:04.920 --> 0:46:07.600
<v Speaker 1>was coming back from what I know, So you're you're

0:46:07.719 --> 0:46:10.759
<v Speaker 1>you might need to address that anyway, and they petty

0:46:10.800 --> 0:46:13.560
<v Speaker 1>and if they had the opportunity, but could you see

0:46:13.600 --> 0:46:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Philly maybe shopping a top ten pick. Yeah, talking about it,

0:46:20.239 --> 0:46:23.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, you might get there and people might still

0:46:23.360 --> 0:46:27.080
<v Speaker 1>want a quarterback. People might still want So I don't know.

0:46:28.080 --> 0:46:30.440
<v Speaker 1>I love Porter. If I'm sitting in here, I'm saying

0:46:30.920 --> 0:46:32.879
<v Speaker 1>get Porter now, because I think there is a much

0:46:32.920 --> 0:46:35.560
<v Speaker 1>better chance the corner class thins out at thirty than

0:46:35.560 --> 0:46:37.920
<v Speaker 1>the running backs too. And even if I'm not even

0:46:37.920 --> 0:46:40.120
<v Speaker 1>if I'm not getting Bajan Robinson, I think I could

0:46:40.160 --> 0:46:44.279
<v Speaker 1>get Gibbs potentially at thirty. And the scheme that I

0:46:44.360 --> 0:46:46.880
<v Speaker 1>run is very favorable to the running game, and I

0:46:46.920 --> 0:46:49.120
<v Speaker 1>think masks some deficiencies in certain running backs, and so

0:46:49.160 --> 0:46:50.560
<v Speaker 1>I think you can have success there. I need the

0:46:50.560 --> 0:46:52.120
<v Speaker 1>best corner that I can get. Either way, they can

0:46:52.160 --> 0:46:54.560
<v Speaker 1>bleep themselves because I love both those players and I

0:46:54.600 --> 0:46:56.960
<v Speaker 1>hate them. So the group agrees that you would go

0:46:57.000 --> 0:46:59.640
<v Speaker 1>for Porter here, Yeah, Porter here, and then and let

0:46:59.719 --> 0:47:02.799
<v Speaker 1>rob and slide. Are you going? I think that I

0:47:02.800 --> 0:47:05.920
<v Speaker 1>would go with I think I would go with Robinson,

0:47:06.200 --> 0:47:08.040
<v Speaker 1>is what I would. Robinson's a better player, and I would,

0:47:08.080 --> 0:47:10.120
<v Speaker 1>and then I would, and then I would, I would

0:47:10.120 --> 0:47:11.799
<v Speaker 1>tag one. I'd find one of these corners on the

0:47:11.840 --> 0:47:14.000
<v Speaker 1>back end. All right, we go to the commanders there

0:47:14.000 --> 0:47:17.440
<v Speaker 1>now on the clock at sixteen. Their needs are quarterback

0:47:18.120 --> 0:47:23.360
<v Speaker 1>with a queue, quarter back, cornerback with a C guard,

0:47:23.680 --> 0:47:28.960
<v Speaker 1>tight end, linebacker. Your choices are Devin Witherspoon cornerback Illinois

0:47:29.600 --> 0:47:32.680
<v Speaker 1>or Michael Mayer or any plug any one of the

0:47:32.719 --> 0:47:35.400
<v Speaker 1>tight ends you want. Now you know you could you

0:47:35.400 --> 0:47:37.799
<v Speaker 1>could plug it, but at this point Michael mayor I

0:47:37.800 --> 0:47:39.840
<v Speaker 1>did it because he's the best tight end on my board.

0:47:40.400 --> 0:47:43.359
<v Speaker 1>But you could plug in Kincaid or one of those others.

0:47:43.400 --> 0:47:46.600
<v Speaker 1>But we're talking at sixteen right now. Would you take

0:47:46.680 --> 0:47:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Witherspoon or Michael Mayer? And I'm wiped at quarterback at

0:47:51.000 --> 0:47:53.319
<v Speaker 1>this point. Yes, you do not have a quarterback on

0:47:53.320 --> 0:48:00.359
<v Speaker 1>the board. Tight end after got it? Logan Thomas see

0:48:00.640 --> 0:48:03.920
<v Speaker 1>that's yeah, Yeah, this is Washington command. We're in the commanders.

0:48:03.920 --> 0:48:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Oh tighter tots. Yeah. I would go with Witherspoon over

0:48:08.120 --> 0:48:10.600
<v Speaker 1>May right. I've got Witherspoon rated a little bit higher.

0:48:10.640 --> 0:48:12.600
<v Speaker 1>I like may Or a lot. I think he's good,

0:48:13.080 --> 0:48:15.880
<v Speaker 1>but I Thomas is just he's got injury issues. You

0:48:15.920 --> 0:48:18.360
<v Speaker 1>have you have Kincaid number one. I've got Kinkaid number one.

0:48:18.400 --> 0:48:23.560
<v Speaker 1>He's my top tight end. Kincaid No, Musgrave, Musgrave? Cool? Yeah,

0:48:23.600 --> 0:48:27.479
<v Speaker 1>who's your top tight end? Oh? Kaid? Who's Can I

0:48:27.560 --> 0:48:30.680
<v Speaker 1>ask who the top offensive lineman is on the board?

0:48:30.719 --> 0:48:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Do you have that? Or am I ruining your game?

0:48:33.920 --> 0:48:36.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm just saying, Okay, then I won't. I'm fine. Then

0:48:36.680 --> 0:48:38.680
<v Speaker 1>it's Witherspoon. I don't even think about a tight end.

0:48:38.719 --> 0:48:40.279
<v Speaker 1>If it's between a tight end and the corner from

0:48:40.280 --> 0:48:42.480
<v Speaker 1>from Washington. The only thing that would give me some

0:48:42.560 --> 0:48:44.759
<v Speaker 1>pauses depending on what the quality of the offensive line was,

0:48:44.840 --> 0:48:47.880
<v Speaker 1>because you made the good point again of like cornerback

0:48:47.920 --> 0:48:50.839
<v Speaker 1>falls off far faster their offensive line and Washington, yeah

0:48:50.840 --> 0:48:52.880
<v Speaker 1>you don't. You don't have a chance for Sharonski or

0:48:52.920 --> 0:48:55.239
<v Speaker 1>anything like that. Okay, Yeah, then I then give me,

0:48:55.440 --> 0:48:57.600
<v Speaker 1>give me Witherspoon. Yeah, and it's gonna be good because

0:48:57.600 --> 0:48:59.160
<v Speaker 1>I think Ceede Lamb is gonna give him fits and

0:48:59.200 --> 0:49:02.360
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna grab him and get flagged all day. You know.

0:49:02.440 --> 0:49:04.440
<v Speaker 1>It's not like a Witherspoon fan. No, I'm not as

0:49:04.520 --> 0:49:06.640
<v Speaker 1>high on Witherspoon as others are. I'm not either, but

0:49:06.719 --> 0:49:09.319
<v Speaker 1>I would take him right there over Oh yeah too.

0:49:09.440 --> 0:49:11.080
<v Speaker 1>He got to be in the right place, he does.

0:49:11.280 --> 0:49:14.360
<v Speaker 1>He got to be in the right place, the right coaches,

0:49:14.440 --> 0:49:16.920
<v Speaker 1>the right situation for him to see because he is

0:49:16.960 --> 0:49:22.120
<v Speaker 1>such a aggressive in his attitude. Is so? I mean,

0:49:22.160 --> 0:49:24.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, is this man a strong safety? Like he

0:49:24.200 --> 0:49:26.600
<v Speaker 1>put in my notes? Is he a safety? I know?

0:49:26.680 --> 0:49:28.080
<v Speaker 1>I usually we're on the same and I would think

0:49:28.080 --> 0:49:30.839
<v Speaker 1>his teammates better in Martin for all the for all

0:49:30.880 --> 0:49:34.480
<v Speaker 1>the chatter about Tyler Smith and how heavily penalized he

0:49:34.520 --> 0:49:36.239
<v Speaker 1>was and how much he holds and what is this

0:49:36.280 --> 0:49:38.440
<v Speaker 1>going to care over the next level? I think way

0:49:38.480 --> 0:49:43.400
<v Speaker 1>more consistently grabbiness at corner in college translates to a

0:49:43.480 --> 0:49:47.040
<v Speaker 1>grabby corner in the NFL, and that always freaks man.

0:49:47.120 --> 0:49:49.279
<v Speaker 1>He does he grabs a lot. He does. I feel

0:49:49.280 --> 0:49:51.319
<v Speaker 1>like he's gonna get flagged on go watch Michigan, and

0:49:51.360 --> 0:49:54.080
<v Speaker 1>he costs them that game. Michigan targeted him in that

0:49:54.120 --> 0:49:56.640
<v Speaker 1>final drive. He had two penalties and set up Michigan

0:49:56.640 --> 0:49:58.719
<v Speaker 1>for the game winning field goal. So you guys are

0:49:58.760 --> 0:50:03.160
<v Speaker 1>taking Witherspoon the grabby, yeah right? For good? Yeah? Perfect?

0:50:06.520 --> 0:50:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Do you want to give him kincaide? No? Okay, thank goodness?

0:50:09.719 --> 0:50:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Who are you? Who are you taking? I think I

0:50:12.000 --> 0:50:14.760
<v Speaker 1>would take uh. I think I would take Witherspoon. Okay

0:50:14.920 --> 0:50:17.000
<v Speaker 1>is what I would do. All right? Here we go.

0:50:17.239 --> 0:50:19.880
<v Speaker 1>The New York Football Giants around the clock at twenty

0:50:19.880 --> 0:50:27.640
<v Speaker 1>five needs wide receiver, cornerback with a seat, center guard, safety,

0:50:27.920 --> 0:50:35.000
<v Speaker 1>linebacker Jordan Addison wide receiver USC's on the board. Emanuel Forbes,

0:50:35.200 --> 0:50:39.120
<v Speaker 1>cornerback Mississippi State is on the board. Who would you

0:50:39.160 --> 0:50:44.400
<v Speaker 1>take between Addison and Forbes at twenty five for the Giants? Boy,

0:50:44.480 --> 0:50:47.920
<v Speaker 1>those two guys their weight combined out up to Osiris Torrance.

0:50:48.440 --> 0:50:55.200
<v Speaker 1>Those are skinny players right there. I'm taking you know, Addison,

0:50:55.360 --> 0:50:58.280
<v Speaker 1>and I know that Danes brought this point up before.

0:50:58.520 --> 0:51:01.640
<v Speaker 1>I believe there is some familiarity in terms of what

0:51:01.680 --> 0:51:03.560
<v Speaker 1>the route running and how clean he is with Addison,

0:51:03.640 --> 0:51:07.239
<v Speaker 1>with Stefan Diggs and Stefan Diggs, and the success that

0:51:07.239 --> 0:51:13.120
<v Speaker 1>that Giants coaching staff had with him in Buffalo. I

0:51:13.160 --> 0:51:15.719
<v Speaker 1>would be really intrigued by the idea of getting a

0:51:15.719 --> 0:51:18.080
<v Speaker 1>weapon like that there to Daniel Jones, especially if you've

0:51:18.120 --> 0:51:20.440
<v Speaker 1>invested in your quarterback like that, I think you should

0:51:20.440 --> 0:51:23.880
<v Speaker 1>start investing in some weapons for him. And so I

0:51:23.920 --> 0:51:27.600
<v Speaker 1>think that's an easy Jordan Addison, real example for me too. Addison, Yeah,

0:51:27.640 --> 0:51:30.160
<v Speaker 1>I agree. All right, let's move on to your Dallas Cowboys.

0:51:30.160 --> 0:51:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Then Addison's the pick at twenty four, right, Dallas Football Cowboys,

0:51:33.280 --> 0:51:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys, Okay, needs, they're looking at corner, guard, receiver, safety,

0:51:40.000 --> 0:51:43.160
<v Speaker 1>tied in here. Your name's at twenty six. According to

0:51:43.239 --> 0:51:48.320
<v Speaker 1>Dan Burglar, they're on your board, Cam Smith, Dalton Kincaid,

0:51:48.960 --> 0:51:55.000
<v Speaker 1>o Cyrus Torrens, Quentin Johnston. He had a corner, a

0:51:55.080 --> 0:51:59.000
<v Speaker 1>tied end, a guard, and a wide receiver. Cam Smith

0:51:59.080 --> 0:52:03.360
<v Speaker 1>a corner, Dalton Kinkaid, the tied end, Oh, Cyrus Torrence,

0:52:03.440 --> 0:52:08.680
<v Speaker 1>the guard, Quinton Johnston the wide receiver from TCU Cowboys.

0:52:09.040 --> 0:52:13.680
<v Speaker 1>You're on the clock, best player, talk it out him

0:52:13.680 --> 0:52:17.400
<v Speaker 1>on your for me isiss Kinkaid is the best of

0:52:18.239 --> 0:52:22.080
<v Speaker 1>If I if I felt any better about Quinton Johnston's

0:52:22.120 --> 0:52:24.200
<v Speaker 1>play strength, I'd go with him. Well, I mean, but

0:52:24.280 --> 0:52:27.200
<v Speaker 1>then when you talk about the size and all that stuff,

0:52:27.200 --> 0:52:29.080
<v Speaker 1>and you look at Kincaid and all the stuff he

0:52:29.080 --> 0:52:31.719
<v Speaker 1>can do receiver wise, no offist to Quinton Johnson. I'm

0:52:31.760 --> 0:52:34.960
<v Speaker 1>just like Quinton Johnston is to me. If I felt

0:52:34.960 --> 0:52:36.879
<v Speaker 1>better about his play strength, if I felt better about

0:52:36.920 --> 0:52:39.360
<v Speaker 1>him getting off the line of scrimmage with press and everything,

0:52:39.480 --> 0:52:42.920
<v Speaker 1>I think he is the perfect fit for some of

0:52:42.960 --> 0:52:45.520
<v Speaker 1>these concepts that they're talking about running on offense next year.

0:52:45.920 --> 0:52:50.080
<v Speaker 1>I just I don't know if the play strength and

0:52:50.160 --> 0:52:55.520
<v Speaker 1>the toughness that the catch point is is that that's

0:52:55.520 --> 0:52:57.000
<v Speaker 1>just what I'd have to have a question if somebody

0:52:57.040 --> 0:52:58.920
<v Speaker 1>could convince me and the like, if I was in

0:52:58.960 --> 0:53:01.120
<v Speaker 1>that room with them, and then Johnson makes a lot

0:53:01.200 --> 0:53:03.879
<v Speaker 1>of plays down the field, if if the scouts could

0:53:03.920 --> 0:53:06.640
<v Speaker 1>convince me, like, if there was somebody in the room

0:53:06.680 --> 0:53:09.799
<v Speaker 1>like and could convince me Quinn Johnson's playstrength isn't going

0:53:09.840 --> 0:53:11.120
<v Speaker 1>to be an issue. Here's why or this is why

0:53:11.160 --> 0:53:13.080
<v Speaker 1>this is gonna be okay, Then I'd feel better about it.

0:53:13.239 --> 0:53:15.479
<v Speaker 1>If I had any lingering questions about it, I would

0:53:15.520 --> 0:53:19.399
<v Speaker 1>go probably did. But you know, I saw, I saw

0:53:19.400 --> 0:53:21.239
<v Speaker 1>a guy that competes. I just I don't know that

0:53:21.280 --> 0:53:26.200
<v Speaker 1>he has the He's just he gets bullied, I feel

0:53:26.200 --> 0:53:28.320
<v Speaker 1>like too much for his size, like in the short

0:53:28.320 --> 0:53:30.360
<v Speaker 1>and intermediate game. And that's gonna be a lot of

0:53:30.360 --> 0:53:32.640
<v Speaker 1>what they're doing next year passing the ball. Yeah, well

0:53:32.680 --> 0:53:34.640
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot. And I really like Quinn watching

0:53:34.640 --> 0:53:37.560
<v Speaker 1>the highlights. Chris Steam's got the highlights stuff on the board.

0:53:37.640 --> 0:53:39.719
<v Speaker 1>Some of it ain't got ain't gotta do with just

0:53:39.800 --> 0:53:43.080
<v Speaker 1>the scheme they run also too, I mean he seemed

0:53:43.120 --> 0:53:45.799
<v Speaker 1>like they're open a lot. There's times where he just

0:53:45.840 --> 0:53:49.160
<v Speaker 1>takes over games like Max Duggan is just feeding him.

0:53:49.239 --> 0:53:52.799
<v Speaker 1>Oh they do not. They don't make the CFP without

0:53:52.880 --> 0:53:54.719
<v Speaker 1>him doing what he did in October against those ranked

0:53:54.719 --> 0:53:58.319
<v Speaker 1>teams when when they went on any other one he

0:53:58.400 --> 0:54:00.200
<v Speaker 1>was putting against rank teams and he was putting like

0:54:00.200 --> 0:54:03.319
<v Speaker 1>one seventy and one. He absolutely is really good for

0:54:03.360 --> 0:54:06.280
<v Speaker 1>what this team is going to do next year, and

0:54:06.840 --> 0:54:08.719
<v Speaker 1>what he'd have to run the kind of you know,

0:54:08.960 --> 0:54:10.759
<v Speaker 1>route tree that he'd run here, I would guess in

0:54:10.800 --> 0:54:15.399
<v Speaker 1>all likelihood, The question to me is can he can

0:54:15.400 --> 0:54:17.560
<v Speaker 1>he beat those press Man corners? Like is he gonna

0:54:17.520 --> 0:54:19.960
<v Speaker 1>get knocked off his route to easy? Everything about timing

0:54:20.440 --> 0:54:24.719
<v Speaker 1>and the the real specificity of it and being just

0:54:25.040 --> 0:54:28.919
<v Speaker 1>dead on. I'd have to be certain that he could

0:54:28.920 --> 0:54:31.040
<v Speaker 1>do that. But that against press that could be the

0:54:31.120 --> 0:54:32.719
<v Speaker 1>argument to me. But I think that could be the

0:54:32.800 --> 0:54:34.759
<v Speaker 1>argument for a lot of these receivers because they a

0:54:34.840 --> 0:54:37.799
<v Speaker 1>lot of them are undersaged. So I mean, I guess

0:54:37.840 --> 0:54:40.720
<v Speaker 1>you could say, like, can these are these guys winning?

0:54:40.960 --> 0:54:42.440
<v Speaker 1>Are these guys is going to be able to win

0:54:42.480 --> 0:54:44.520
<v Speaker 1>with their route running or with their power? I think

0:54:44.520 --> 0:54:48.399
<v Speaker 1>place strength is something he can approve on, you'd hope.

0:54:48.680 --> 0:54:51.720
<v Speaker 1>But I mean he was two o eight massive drop

0:54:52.040 --> 0:54:55.160
<v Speaker 1>massive drop off and receiver in my opinion here compared

0:54:55.160 --> 0:54:57.520
<v Speaker 1>to these other two positions like Kincaid. If we're going

0:54:57.560 --> 0:55:00.760
<v Speaker 1>best player available for me, it's Kincaid you can find.

0:55:00.840 --> 0:55:04.080
<v Speaker 1>I think corner stretches. I think tight end might stretch.

0:55:04.719 --> 0:55:07.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't think receiver does. I think I'd feel better

0:55:07.560 --> 0:55:10.839
<v Speaker 1>about going Quentin Johnson. Now I love Cam Smith. Yeah,

0:55:10.840 --> 0:55:13.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think Cam Smith would be in serious

0:55:13.160 --> 0:55:15.880
<v Speaker 1>consideration here. I mean that dude talks, he plays with

0:55:15.920 --> 0:55:18.399
<v Speaker 1>a swagger. I think I'd have a lot of fun

0:55:18.400 --> 0:55:20.759
<v Speaker 1>pairing him with Treyvon Diggs, and they were desperate for

0:55:20.800 --> 0:55:23.200
<v Speaker 1>a number two corner. If I if I take a

0:55:23.320 --> 0:55:27.160
<v Speaker 1>receiver or a tight end in the first round, I'm

0:55:27.200 --> 0:55:30.920
<v Speaker 1>not taking the other position till day three. You got

0:55:30.960 --> 0:55:33.839
<v Speaker 1>to me. Let me change scepting here for you then

0:55:33.880 --> 0:55:36.160
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. Yeah, we're not allowed on our show

0:55:36.239 --> 0:55:41.320
<v Speaker 1>here to talk about specific players, but there's rumors about

0:55:41.360 --> 0:55:44.200
<v Speaker 1>certain receivers that might be available. Now we could talk

0:55:44.200 --> 0:55:47.200
<v Speaker 1>about Beckham, sure, okay, we could talk about him because

0:55:47.200 --> 0:55:48.960
<v Speaker 1>he is on the street, but we can't talk about

0:55:48.960 --> 0:55:52.560
<v Speaker 1>other things that are other unnamed veterans. If if if

0:55:52.600 --> 0:55:54.960
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden free agency they added one of

0:55:55.000 --> 0:56:00.719
<v Speaker 1>these wide receivers now drafted, not taking now, not taking

0:56:00.800 --> 0:56:05.400
<v Speaker 1>Quentin Johnston, take it with Smith kincaid and and go

0:56:05.480 --> 0:56:08.759
<v Speaker 1>from there and Torrance, because you're probably not going to

0:56:08.880 --> 0:56:11.880
<v Speaker 1>draft a wide receiver if you in fact traded for

0:56:11.960 --> 0:56:15.520
<v Speaker 1>one or signed. This is tough. If you have Smith Kincaid,

0:56:15.560 --> 0:56:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Torrance and you added a receiver, yeah, and it would

0:56:19.040 --> 0:56:22.880
<v Speaker 1>depend on who it is, but my inclination would be

0:56:22.920 --> 0:56:25.239
<v Speaker 1>Torrance is by far the last of those to me,

0:56:26.440 --> 0:56:34.040
<v Speaker 1>I would probably Kincaid still why he's just disgusted. You

0:56:34.080 --> 0:56:39.880
<v Speaker 1>sound like you're disgusted because I whoever you're adding in

0:56:39.960 --> 0:56:43.400
<v Speaker 1>free agency is still a very short term solution for

0:56:44.280 --> 0:56:49.920
<v Speaker 1>an offense that I think needs to grow together. And

0:56:50.000 --> 0:56:52.680
<v Speaker 1>so because of it, Now, if you're telling me and

0:56:52.840 --> 0:56:54.600
<v Speaker 1>there's no receiver out there like this, let's say there's

0:56:54.600 --> 0:56:56.759
<v Speaker 1>a receiver on the trade market who's twenty four years old,

0:56:56.760 --> 0:56:58.480
<v Speaker 1>who's fallen out of favor but as a stud, and

0:56:58.520 --> 0:57:01.040
<v Speaker 1>they go get and acquire him and give an extension

0:57:01.080 --> 0:57:03.400
<v Speaker 1>something like that. If they were to do something like that,

0:57:03.440 --> 0:57:05.120
<v Speaker 1>then all of a sudden, I'm changing my priorities and

0:57:05.160 --> 0:57:06.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm not worried about tight end, but in terms, I

0:57:06.840 --> 0:57:10.600
<v Speaker 1>need an immediate, long term weapon here in the passing game.

0:57:10.640 --> 0:57:13.040
<v Speaker 1>So whether that's a receiver or tight end whatever, And

0:57:13.080 --> 0:57:14.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that a free agent move for a

0:57:14.600 --> 0:57:18.120
<v Speaker 1>veteran who's past thirty or whatever may do that for me.

0:57:18.840 --> 0:57:20.840
<v Speaker 1>I also want to say, like, I feel like we

0:57:20.960 --> 0:57:24.360
<v Speaker 1>have a whole bunch of faith, and I love Heney

0:57:24.360 --> 0:57:26.880
<v Speaker 1>a firt, love what they do. But the tight end

0:57:26.920 --> 0:57:31.320
<v Speaker 1>position is intricate. It takes time to completely understand it

0:57:31.400 --> 0:57:34.080
<v Speaker 1>and to grow into it. And these guys haven't gotten

0:57:34.080 --> 0:57:36.520
<v Speaker 1>they grown man body, Henny deal, he dealt with some

0:57:36.560 --> 0:57:39.439
<v Speaker 1>soft tissue stuff. You know, I still think you want

0:57:39.480 --> 0:57:43.280
<v Speaker 1>to shore up that room, like progressively. Like, even though

0:57:43.320 --> 0:57:46.000
<v Speaker 1>those guys showed us great things this past year, I

0:57:46.080 --> 0:57:49.360
<v Speaker 1>think it is kind of irrational to just be like, yeah,

0:57:49.640 --> 0:57:52.240
<v Speaker 1>you're totally fine there, like heck no, Like I would

0:57:52.280 --> 0:57:54.640
<v Speaker 1>definitely be trying to still add to what they have

0:57:54.680 --> 0:57:56.720
<v Speaker 1>because they still have a lot to learn about the

0:57:56.760 --> 0:57:59.720
<v Speaker 1>position they'll they'll Yeah, I definitely would still be in

0:57:59.760 --> 0:58:02.480
<v Speaker 1>favor of adding a tight end. But if I'm taking

0:58:02.480 --> 0:58:06.160
<v Speaker 1>a receiver at twenty six, then I'm probably not even

0:58:06.160 --> 0:58:08.760
<v Speaker 1>bothering with tight end till the fourth round though, like

0:58:08.880 --> 0:58:11.200
<v Speaker 1>the because I've got other issues at play, I'm not

0:58:11.200 --> 0:58:12.680
<v Speaker 1>going to add a receiver and a tight end and

0:58:12.720 --> 0:58:16.920
<v Speaker 1>ignore a lot of questions at corner, questions with what

0:58:16.960 --> 0:58:19.400
<v Speaker 1>you're doing at running back and all those sorts of things.

0:58:19.480 --> 0:58:24.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm taking Kim Smith, I've Kinkaid and all that. I'm

0:58:24.760 --> 0:58:29.920
<v Speaker 1>voting Kinkaid, Kinkaid. I'm voting Kinkaid also too, I'm not

0:58:29.920 --> 0:58:31.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna fight. I mean, he's my he'd be my number

0:58:31.760 --> 0:58:35.880
<v Speaker 1>one player out of the bunch. But I think they

0:58:35.920 --> 0:58:38.480
<v Speaker 1>got a desperate need a corner. I think it's saying

0:58:38.480 --> 0:58:40.200
<v Speaker 1>all the things that they don't grab a wide receiver.

0:58:40.200 --> 0:58:42.920
<v Speaker 1>I'd take. Johnston's who I would take, Okay, all right,

0:58:42.960 --> 0:58:45.040
<v Speaker 1>so you see you's who I would take. All right.

0:58:45.120 --> 0:58:47.000
<v Speaker 1>That brings us to the end of the Draft Show

0:58:47.200 --> 0:58:50.120
<v Speaker 1>for another week. We appreciate everybody for listening. Thank you

0:58:50.200 --> 0:58:53.560
<v Speaker 1>so much around the world. We thank you for your questions,

0:58:53.960 --> 0:58:57.200
<v Speaker 1>your comments. Make sure you interact with us the best

0:58:57.200 --> 0:58:59.600
<v Speaker 1>you can on Twitter, and we will do our best

0:58:59.600 --> 0:59:03.600
<v Speaker 1>to continue to investigate, educate. That's what the show is

0:59:03.640 --> 0:59:07.720
<v Speaker 1>all about. For Aisha Morrison, for Zach Wolchuk, and for

0:59:07.800 --> 0:59:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Bobby Belt and Chris Beam and Brian Bruss. Have a

0:59:10.240 --> 0:59:12.040
<v Speaker 1>good week and we'll see you next time on The

0:59:12.120 --> 0:59:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Draft Show. This has been a production of Dallas Cowboys

0:59:15.640 --> 0:59:18.280
<v Speaker 1>dot Com and the Dallas Cowboys Football Club.