WEBVTT - SHARP NFL Week 5 Bets: Bears-Packers, Niners-Seahawks and more

0:00:00.830 --> 0:00:05.290
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Sharper Square. We are presented by Polymarket and

0:00:05.330 --> 0:00:09.850
<v Speaker 1>we are a part of the Volume Podcast Network. This

0:00:09.950 --> 0:00:12.450
<v Speaker 1>is the show that makes the squares sharper and makes

0:00:12.490 --> 0:00:14.860
<v Speaker 1>the wise guys pay attention. I am Chad Millman. I

0:00:14.890 --> 0:00:18.919
<v Speaker 1>am joined as always by my co-host, my companion, my compadre,

0:00:18.960 --> 0:00:24.380
<v Speaker 1>my BFF professional better, Simon Hunter. Hello, Simon.

0:00:25.280 --> 0:00:26.300
<v Speaker 2>Chad, how we doing?

0:00:26.760 --> 0:00:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Brother, you're on the road. You made a big road

0:00:28.460 --> 0:00:31.430
<v Speaker 1>trip with your dad. Uh, you're coming to us from

0:00:31.450 --> 0:00:34.760
<v Speaker 1>a remote location. I like when you get out of

0:00:34.780 --> 0:00:35.660
<v Speaker 1>the house during the season.

0:00:36.920 --> 0:00:39.900
<v Speaker 3>I don't, I'm a creature of habit, but, uh, we

0:00:39.940 --> 0:00:41.339
<v Speaker 3>know we need to switch it up anyway. We need

0:00:41.360 --> 0:00:44.640
<v Speaker 3>some wind. So yeah, on the road, seeing my cousin

0:00:44.680 --> 0:00:45.580
<v Speaker 3>play some soccer.

0:00:45.940 --> 0:00:46.740
<v Speaker 2>Uh, he's a senior.

0:00:46.800 --> 0:00:50.400
<v Speaker 3>So normally I would not be doing anything during the season,

0:00:50.440 --> 0:00:51.940
<v Speaker 3>but I have two major family events.

0:00:51.960 --> 0:00:53.479
<v Speaker 2>You have a wedding and I had this.

0:00:53.760 --> 0:00:56.720
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, headed down North Carolina, watching some high school

0:00:56.740 --> 0:00:59.880
<v Speaker 3>soccer and, uh, see my man get, you know, I

0:00:59.920 --> 0:01:01.770
<v Speaker 3>think he's like their MVP, so he's getting some award.

0:01:01.810 --> 0:01:02.850
<v Speaker 2>Really proud of him.

0:01:03.590 --> 0:01:05.289
<v Speaker 3>I was trying to find ways to talk my way

0:01:05.330 --> 0:01:07.130
<v Speaker 3>out of it, Chad, but it's like, man, I got

0:01:07.730 --> 0:01:09.290
<v Speaker 3>to go down. You got to spend time with the family.

0:01:09.450 --> 0:01:11.910
<v Speaker 1>You just do it. In the end, you're never going

0:01:11.930 --> 0:01:13.790
<v Speaker 1>to regret it. You're going to be glad you made

0:01:13.810 --> 0:01:16.170
<v Speaker 1>the effort. You're going to have the memory. It's going

0:01:16.190 --> 0:01:18.150
<v Speaker 1>to be awesome. You know what else is going to

0:01:18.170 --> 0:01:23.950
<v Speaker 1>be awesome? This is our NFL Week 5 Thursday show.

0:01:24.010 --> 0:01:25.509
<v Speaker 1>You and I, we're going to talk about some sharp

0:01:25.569 --> 0:01:31.600
<v Speaker 1>calls and brass balls. our underdog and favorite round robins,

0:01:32.260 --> 0:01:36.690
<v Speaker 1>your biggest bets, our sharp versus square, our discord grouper

0:01:37.130 --> 0:01:40.050
<v Speaker 1>of the week. We're going to narrow down to our

0:01:40.290 --> 0:01:47.870
<v Speaker 1>final five official picks of the free $ 25, 000 NFL pick'em contest,

0:01:47.910 --> 0:01:54.080
<v Speaker 1>which is still available for signup, sharpersquare.thevolume.com. Top 10 finishers

0:01:54.300 --> 0:01:59.800
<v Speaker 1>get paid $ 10, 000 first place, Simon. All right. Every week,

0:02:00.860 --> 0:02:03.480
<v Speaker 1>we discuss our picks on Tuesday. By Thursday, you've gotten

0:02:03.540 --> 0:02:11.410
<v Speaker 1>an earful from your professional betting colleagues, what they hate,

0:02:12.000 --> 0:02:14.869
<v Speaker 1>what they don't, what they like that I said, which

0:02:14.930 --> 0:02:19.530
<v Speaker 1>is always making me happy. It's time for Sharp Calls.

0:02:20.350 --> 0:02:20.829
<v Speaker 2>Who's there?

0:02:20.910 --> 0:02:26.109
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking. Ring, ring, telephone ring. Somebody say it.

0:02:26.150 --> 0:02:33.739
<v Speaker 2>Baby, what you doing? Yeah, crazy week with the line movement, Chad.

0:02:33.919 --> 0:02:38.210
<v Speaker 3>A lot of guys taking positions and moving pretty big numbers.

0:02:39.430 --> 0:02:41.410
<v Speaker 3>Let's start with the games we loved that the numbers

0:02:41.450 --> 0:02:44.030
<v Speaker 3>have moved. Texans, they were six and a half. We

0:02:44.070 --> 0:02:46.770
<v Speaker 3>talked about it on Tuesday. Just so much money. So

0:02:46.790 --> 0:02:48.470
<v Speaker 3>many guys I've talked to have just had the same

0:02:48.510 --> 0:02:51.850
<v Speaker 3>view I have. It's like, yes, this Texas team isn't

0:02:51.889 --> 0:02:55.270
<v Speaker 3>what we thought they were, but I knew this was

0:02:55.290 --> 0:02:58.510
<v Speaker 3>going to be the Mika Rines, all-in, burn the ships

0:02:58.530 --> 0:03:00.810
<v Speaker 3>type of game. And you saw, even this week, he said,

0:03:00.850 --> 0:03:03.910
<v Speaker 3>I'm taking over the play calling. So my view is

0:03:03.950 --> 0:03:06.090
<v Speaker 3>exactly what it was going to be, was this is

0:03:06.510 --> 0:03:08.589
<v Speaker 3>a D'Amico, this team loves him type of game. So

0:03:08.650 --> 0:03:11.790
<v Speaker 3>tons of calls on that one where all the guys agree.

0:03:11.810 --> 0:03:13.250
<v Speaker 3>Even at seven, minus seven and a half, the guys

0:03:13.290 --> 0:03:14.940
<v Speaker 3>are like, I'd still play it. They had the same

0:03:14.980 --> 0:03:18.140
<v Speaker 3>view of me. If the Texans are a good team,

0:03:18.360 --> 0:03:21.160
<v Speaker 3>they should win 20 to 10, 30 to 10. They

0:03:21.180 --> 0:03:24.120
<v Speaker 3>should blow out this Tennessee team. So that was a

0:03:24.160 --> 0:03:26.839
<v Speaker 3>big one of conversation. It's a Miami game, a game

0:03:27.080 --> 0:03:30.120
<v Speaker 3>I feel like, We were in on it. We know

0:03:30.139 --> 0:03:33.060
<v Speaker 3>we're supposed to take it. It was 7.5. It was 7.

0:03:33.060 --> 0:03:37.100
<v Speaker 3>Now it's 6.5. I still know professional groups taking a

0:03:37.400 --> 0:03:40.100
<v Speaker 3>position on it. If you want to wait now, you

0:03:40.140 --> 0:03:42.500
<v Speaker 3>maybe can get back to 7, but that was definitely

0:03:42.910 --> 0:03:46.690
<v Speaker 3>a big discussion this week. Other games we talked about

0:03:46.710 --> 0:03:49.890
<v Speaker 3>that the line has really moved heavily. Atlanta, I mean,

0:03:50.650 --> 0:03:53.210
<v Speaker 3>talked about it at plus 3.5. Talked about it at

0:03:53.250 --> 0:03:56.090
<v Speaker 3>plus 2.5. Talked about it when they were minus 2.5 favorites.

0:03:57.340 --> 0:03:58.780
<v Speaker 3>Now they're up to minus three and a half. So

0:03:58.820 --> 0:04:01.320
<v Speaker 3>it's just one of those where I was banging it.

0:04:01.760 --> 0:04:04.560
<v Speaker 3>Guys were hitting it really hard. Like I know some

0:04:04.580 --> 0:04:07.420
<v Speaker 3>groups have taken really large positions on it and it's

0:04:07.460 --> 0:04:09.440
<v Speaker 3>all a hedge against Lamar. If Lamar plays, you can

0:04:09.470 --> 0:04:11.640
<v Speaker 3>buy your position. That's the whole point and review of it.

0:04:11.660 --> 0:04:14.310
<v Speaker 3>And if he does play with an ankle injury, you're

0:04:14.330 --> 0:04:17.130
<v Speaker 3>getting great value. So that's another line that just, you

0:04:17.150 --> 0:04:19.190
<v Speaker 3>get these rare opportunities and you see the spot where

0:04:19.210 --> 0:04:21.350
<v Speaker 3>it's like, okay, this is a guy where are they

0:04:21.370 --> 0:04:23.930
<v Speaker 3>going to force them back? If he has an ankle injury,

0:04:23.950 --> 0:04:26.960
<v Speaker 3>Lamar Jackson and, We'll find out today, right after our show,

0:04:27.000 --> 0:04:28.529
<v Speaker 3>we should know if he's going to practice or not.

0:04:28.560 --> 0:04:31.440
<v Speaker 3>If he doesn't practice today, highly unlikely Lamar plays in

0:04:31.460 --> 0:04:34.010
<v Speaker 3>that game. So another game, if you want to take

0:04:34.029 --> 0:04:35.630
<v Speaker 3>a position on minus three and a half, I don't

0:04:35.690 --> 0:04:38.150
<v Speaker 3>hate it. It's just we're trying to give you out

0:04:38.170 --> 0:04:39.669
<v Speaker 3>the best number here. And that's what every pro that

0:04:39.710 --> 0:04:41.470
<v Speaker 3>I talked to was like, yeah, I'm right there with

0:04:41.490 --> 0:04:44.300
<v Speaker 3>you guys. I'm betting that number right now. So that's

0:04:44.310 --> 0:04:46.839
<v Speaker 3>when I really jumped out. Games we might be wrong

0:04:46.940 --> 0:04:50.419
<v Speaker 3>on Packers getting a lot of love from the from

0:04:50.440 --> 0:04:53.929
<v Speaker 3>the pros and the Packers. I think I'm dug in, Chad.

0:04:53.990 --> 0:04:55.789
<v Speaker 3>I think I'm dug in on these Bears, man. So

0:04:55.810 --> 0:04:58.990
<v Speaker 3>that's been a fun conversation this week. Just a lot

0:04:59.010 --> 0:05:02.589
<v Speaker 3>of pros on the Packers side. A lot of pros

0:05:02.670 --> 0:05:05.190
<v Speaker 3>on Tampa tonight, which I know we'll talk about. I'm

0:05:05.230 --> 0:05:07.410
<v Speaker 3>still dug in on Dallas. That's another really fun back

0:05:07.450 --> 0:05:10.070
<v Speaker 3>and forth. I get what they're betting. I get it.

0:05:10.110 --> 0:05:11.750
<v Speaker 2>That's a huge number and a bad defense.

0:05:13.230 --> 0:05:16.240
<v Speaker 3>But that's been really interesting to me, just the pros

0:05:16.250 --> 0:05:17.780
<v Speaker 3>who are taking their stand on it. It's really about

0:05:18.320 --> 0:05:20.440
<v Speaker 3>backing the trends. There's just a lot of trends that

0:05:20.480 --> 0:05:23.120
<v Speaker 3>favor back and tip here, this big number on Thursday

0:05:23.160 --> 0:05:27.560
<v Speaker 3>night and another game where I, you know, might be

0:05:27.600 --> 0:05:31.340
<v Speaker 3>missing something here. And the, the pros on their side, 49ers,

0:05:31.720 --> 0:05:34.839
<v Speaker 3>the pros just love the 49ers. They're all talking about it.

0:05:34.839 --> 0:05:35.339
<v Speaker 1>Wow.

0:05:35.600 --> 0:05:38.820
<v Speaker 3>Still pretty dug in on, uh, the Seattle side. So

0:05:38.860 --> 0:05:43.020
<v Speaker 3>that's just one where they just believe the 49ers just

0:05:43.040 --> 0:05:45.560
<v Speaker 3>still underrated the betting public and the Seahawks are still

0:05:45.580 --> 0:05:48.109
<v Speaker 3>a little overrated from last year. So that's, that's been

0:05:48.120 --> 0:05:49.650
<v Speaker 3>a really fun discussion. I know again, we're going to

0:05:49.670 --> 0:05:52.100
<v Speaker 3>talk more about, so, uh, yeah, as far as it

0:05:52.120 --> 0:05:54.080
<v Speaker 3>goes for sharp goals, those are really been the hot topics.

0:05:54.100 --> 0:05:54.780
<v Speaker 2>Those couple of games.

0:05:54.800 --> 0:05:57.370
<v Speaker 1>All right. Well, let's talk about that Thursday night game.

0:05:57.700 --> 0:06:01.410
<v Speaker 1>Just briefly Tampa Bay at Dallas, the line started at

0:06:01.470 --> 0:06:04.290
<v Speaker 1>nine and a half moved down to seven and a half.

0:06:04.810 --> 0:06:07.830
<v Speaker 1>It's back up to eight and a half. I know

0:06:07.910 --> 0:06:10.630
<v Speaker 1>that the sharp money moved it all the way down

0:06:11.390 --> 0:06:14.910
<v Speaker 1>and probably the public is coming in and pushing it

0:06:14.970 --> 0:06:17.590
<v Speaker 1>back up as we get closer to game time because

0:06:17.630 --> 0:06:24.089
<v Speaker 1>of all the enthusiasm for what the Cowboys have done

0:06:24.690 --> 0:06:28.170
<v Speaker 1>offensively and just looking at what the Bucks have, their

0:06:28.230 --> 0:06:32.270
<v Speaker 1>own four, they got a backup quarterback. Historically, this is

0:06:32.350 --> 0:06:39.580
<v Speaker 1>when you smash Tampa Bay. I totally get your position completely.

0:06:40.360 --> 0:06:44.800
<v Speaker 1>I am desperately trying to keep myself from just betting

0:06:44.839 --> 0:06:48.380
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Bay. I have not played the game yet because

0:06:48.420 --> 0:06:52.690
<v Speaker 1>I've been caught betwixt and between, between all the news,

0:06:52.730 --> 0:06:54.520
<v Speaker 1>all the information that's coming in at me right now.

0:06:56.210 --> 0:06:58.469
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I totally get why the pros are taking Bucs high.

0:06:58.490 --> 0:07:00.950
<v Speaker 2>Bucs underlying numbers aren't, they're not that bad of a team.

0:07:01.010 --> 0:07:04.890
<v Speaker 2>Their defense is really good. It is and it isn't, right?

0:07:04.930 --> 0:07:08.630
<v Speaker 3>They've had interesting matchups to start the year, but you're right.

0:07:08.650 --> 0:07:10.470
<v Speaker 3>They're not as, once again, they're not as bad as

0:07:11.130 --> 0:07:14.210
<v Speaker 3>we all overall perceive. And like the trends I was

0:07:14.250 --> 0:07:18.450
<v Speaker 3>talking about, you know, primetime dogs of seven plus points

0:07:18.970 --> 0:07:21.530
<v Speaker 3>facing the team that's coming off, putting over 30 points.

0:07:21.990 --> 0:07:24.050
<v Speaker 3>There's 17 and five in this spot. Like there's a

0:07:24.070 --> 0:07:27.450
<v Speaker 3>ton of trends that really favor the bucks. We look

0:07:27.470 --> 0:07:29.370
<v Speaker 3>at a bunch of different spots and angles for this one.

0:07:29.390 --> 0:07:31.950
<v Speaker 3>And that's another reason the pros are playing. And we

0:07:31.970 --> 0:07:34.330
<v Speaker 3>talked Cowboys defense. Who are they to be favored by

0:07:34.350 --> 0:07:36.650
<v Speaker 3>over a touchdown against anyone? This is just a very

0:07:36.730 --> 0:07:37.570
<v Speaker 3>bad defense.

0:07:38.350 --> 0:07:40.470
<v Speaker 2>All those reasons. I know it's terrifying.

0:07:41.120 --> 0:07:44.239
<v Speaker 3>I just think it's a short week with an undrafted

0:07:44.300 --> 0:07:47.990
<v Speaker 3>rookie quarterback and, he used so much of his luck

0:07:48.050 --> 0:07:50.070
<v Speaker 3>up in that Green Bay game. Like if you really

0:07:50.130 --> 0:07:53.510
<v Speaker 3>watch that game, he's just not, he's not a starter.

0:07:53.670 --> 0:07:56.290
<v Speaker 3>This kid needs three years of coaching. Like he's just

0:07:57.050 --> 0:08:00.760
<v Speaker 3>an incredible athlete. So that's another reason the pros are like, hey,

0:08:01.000 --> 0:08:03.940
<v Speaker 3>this could be an undervalued guy who uses his legs

0:08:04.180 --> 0:08:06.580
<v Speaker 3>and could easily run away from this Cowboys defense. We've

0:08:06.620 --> 0:08:10.760
<v Speaker 3>seen struggle against mobile quarterbacks. So it's another game where

0:08:10.780 --> 0:08:12.600
<v Speaker 3>I really was going to take a position on the Cowboys.

0:08:12.640 --> 0:08:15.500
<v Speaker 3>And now I'm just, you know, Maybe I'll take Dak

0:08:15.560 --> 0:08:17.780
<v Speaker 3>first half instead, go the coward way out. It's minus

0:08:17.800 --> 0:08:20.200
<v Speaker 3>five and a half and take positions like that. But

0:08:20.600 --> 0:08:24.220
<v Speaker 3>just because there's so much professional money on the Bucs, it's.

0:08:24.120 --> 0:08:25.200
<v Speaker 2>Like, you know, I'm a little weary of it, right?

0:08:25.220 --> 0:08:26.300
<v Speaker 2>It feels like I know I'm supposed to bet the

0:08:26.340 --> 0:08:26.760
<v Speaker 2>Cowboys here.

0:08:26.780 --> 0:08:28.660
<v Speaker 3>This is the exact spot the Cowboys beat a team

0:08:29.060 --> 0:08:33.280
<v Speaker 3>by 20, 30 points. But just these trends and, you know,

0:08:33.300 --> 0:08:35.060
<v Speaker 3>the guys I respect, the fact they're on the Bucs,

0:08:35.600 --> 0:08:37.870
<v Speaker 3>I'll steer my money to other games than betting this

0:08:37.900 --> 0:08:38.920
<v Speaker 3>big number on this Cowboys team.

0:08:39.750 --> 0:08:43.410
<v Speaker 1>Will we be steering our money to the Philadelphia Eagles

0:08:43.429 --> 0:08:46.680
<v Speaker 1>this Visited, or not visiting, but playing the Jacksonville Jaguars

0:08:46.760 --> 0:08:52.470
<v Speaker 1>in London on Sunday. Wild 48 hours for the Eagles.

0:08:53.290 --> 0:08:59.910
<v Speaker 1>Lane Johnson retires. Cam Juergens gets traded. Saquon doesn't practice

0:08:59.990 --> 0:09:05.020
<v Speaker 1>on Wednesday. Devontae Smith doesn't practice on Wednesday. Many other

0:09:05.080 --> 0:09:09.600
<v Speaker 1>starters did not practice on Wednesday. Zach Bond limited in

0:09:09.660 --> 0:09:14.040
<v Speaker 1>practice coming back from the concussion. The line... The look

0:09:14.080 --> 0:09:18.500
<v Speaker 1>ahead line, so let's say, you know, preseason line, Eagles

0:09:18.540 --> 0:09:21.719
<v Speaker 1>minus two and a half. It is now Eagles plus

0:09:21.780 --> 0:09:25.480
<v Speaker 1>seven and a half, a 10 point swing, all the money,

0:09:26.140 --> 0:09:32.170
<v Speaker 1>all the tickets on the Jags. Wild, wild turn of events.

0:09:33.510 --> 0:09:37.870
<v Speaker 1>The Jerkins trade almost feels like Howie is packing it in.

0:09:38.850 --> 0:09:41.230
<v Speaker 1>What are you hearing as an Eagles fan, as a

0:09:41.270 --> 0:09:44.340
<v Speaker 1>Philly resident? What are you feeling right now?

0:09:46.059 --> 0:09:47.780
<v Speaker 2>Chad, you're better than that. Do you think the Eagles

0:09:47.800 --> 0:09:49.490
<v Speaker 2>are packing it in after week four, buddy?

0:09:50.130 --> 0:09:52.390
<v Speaker 1>I don't think the Eagles are packing it in. When

0:09:52.429 --> 0:09:54.930
<v Speaker 1>I see that being the conversation, I'm like, it doesn't

0:09:54.950 --> 0:09:56.610
<v Speaker 1>make sense to me. They're going to get healthier. They

0:09:56.650 --> 0:09:59.510
<v Speaker 1>have too much talent. Otherwise, it's not like this defense

0:09:59.530 --> 0:10:02.760
<v Speaker 1>is going to work. to crater, but it does feel

0:10:02.820 --> 0:10:08.610
<v Speaker 1>like people are losing their shit in Philly about what's

0:10:08.620 --> 0:10:11.250
<v Speaker 1>happening with his offensive line, which has been the reason

0:10:11.330 --> 0:10:14.910
<v Speaker 1>why the Eagles have been so good for so long. Yeah.

0:10:15.390 --> 0:10:16.650
<v Speaker 2>It just feels like a misunderstanding.

0:10:16.670 --> 0:10:20.290
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I'm, I, I, to me, if you can

0:10:20.309 --> 0:10:22.250
<v Speaker 3>get a second round pick for Cam Juergens, you take

0:10:22.290 --> 0:10:24.589
<v Speaker 3>that any day of the week. Like I saw some stats,

0:10:24.630 --> 0:10:27.270
<v Speaker 3>there hasn't been an interior offensive lineman traded for a

0:10:27.320 --> 0:10:29.860
<v Speaker 3>pick above a third round pick since 2011.

0:10:29.860 --> 0:10:32.280
<v Speaker 2>So it's very rare. It is random.

0:10:32.340 --> 0:10:33.960
<v Speaker 3>I get why people were just, were shocked. I was

0:10:34.000 --> 0:10:36.840
<v Speaker 3>honestly shocked. I can't believe someone would pay a second

0:10:36.860 --> 0:10:38.140
<v Speaker 3>round pick for Cam Juergens.

0:10:39.070 --> 0:10:39.280
<v Speaker 2>But.

0:10:39.300 --> 0:10:41.210
<v Speaker 1>And he's making a lot of money too. I know

0:10:41.250 --> 0:10:42.990
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles have to figure out some cap stuff.

0:10:43.130 --> 0:10:44.050
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:10:44.270 --> 0:10:44.470
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:10:44.910 --> 0:10:46.650
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. But.

0:10:47.140 --> 0:10:49.400
<v Speaker 3>To me for the Ravens, it makes sense. They're down

0:10:50.240 --> 0:10:52.560
<v Speaker 3>three centers at this point, right? They lost Linderbaum and

0:10:52.580 --> 0:10:54.579
<v Speaker 3>then the two guys they had to replace them both

0:10:54.620 --> 0:10:57.520
<v Speaker 3>got hurt. Cam could step in and be a good

0:10:57.640 --> 0:11:00.530
<v Speaker 3>asset for them. And I think how he looks at

0:11:00.670 --> 0:11:03.689
<v Speaker 3>our backups and just, he's just like, why not? Like

0:11:03.750 --> 0:11:05.590
<v Speaker 3>I just, it can't be worse than what we've been

0:11:05.610 --> 0:11:07.790
<v Speaker 3>putting out there. Like this, if you watch tape and

0:11:08.330 --> 0:11:10.410
<v Speaker 3>you follow these grading services and they give out grades

0:11:10.450 --> 0:11:14.290
<v Speaker 3>every week on these offensive linemen, Cam's been horrible. So

0:11:14.550 --> 0:11:16.940
<v Speaker 3>it's just painful as an Eagles fan because it's, Coming

0:11:16.960 --> 0:11:19.040
<v Speaker 3>into the year, the strength of this team was the line.

0:11:19.800 --> 0:11:22.510
<v Speaker 3>Lane is still playing at a very high level, and

0:11:22.910 --> 0:11:26.770
<v Speaker 3>that's a whole other bag to get into of Lane retiring.

0:11:27.429 --> 0:11:28.689
<v Speaker 3>I didn't really want to say too much about it

0:11:28.710 --> 0:11:31.230
<v Speaker 3>because I don't know if he really retired. I don't

0:11:31.250 --> 0:11:33.610
<v Speaker 3>know if this is just he needs to get away

0:11:33.670 --> 0:11:36.490
<v Speaker 3>from it, clear his head, and he'll see maybe in five,

0:11:36.530 --> 0:11:39.040
<v Speaker 3>six weeks, maybe he'll want to come back, or this

0:11:39.140 --> 0:11:41.140
<v Speaker 3>could be really it. He's got a lot going on

0:11:41.160 --> 0:11:44.700
<v Speaker 3>in his personal life, Lane. It's an interesting time for

0:11:44.740 --> 0:11:48.839
<v Speaker 3>sure for for being an Eagles fan, Chad. And my

0:11:48.900 --> 0:11:51.860
<v Speaker 3>viewpoint was you just blindly bet the Jags as favorites,

0:11:51.940 --> 0:11:54.819
<v Speaker 3>especially in England. You've now hit a point where the

0:11:54.840 --> 0:11:56.679
<v Speaker 3>value has totally shifted to the Eagles.

0:11:56.780 --> 0:11:57.490
<v Speaker 2>Seven and a half.

0:11:58.420 --> 0:12:00.020
<v Speaker 3>I know the books are begging you and you can

0:12:00.070 --> 0:12:01.640
<v Speaker 3>be like me. You can be a sucker and take

0:12:01.679 --> 0:12:04.910
<v Speaker 3>that and probably wake up and you're already down 30,

0:12:04.890 --> 0:12:07.090
<v Speaker 3>nothing like this Eagles team could roll over and die,

0:12:07.670 --> 0:12:09.950
<v Speaker 3>but they still have a really good defense. You know,

0:12:10.010 --> 0:12:12.550
<v Speaker 3>their offense, I know they've been absolutely horrible and they're down.

0:12:13.309 --> 0:12:16.880
<v Speaker 3>Like you said, there's down four offensive linemen. They're number

0:12:16.920 --> 0:12:20.540
<v Speaker 3>one running back, number one tight end, number one receiver.

0:12:21.420 --> 0:12:23.240
<v Speaker 3>And you've got people in the media saying Jalen Hurts.

0:12:23.260 --> 0:12:24.819
<v Speaker 1>And number two running back, by the way.

0:12:25.360 --> 0:12:28.620
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, number two running back. And like Jalen Hurts, yeah,

0:12:28.640 --> 0:12:30.440
<v Speaker 3>can he work a miracle and win this game? That

0:12:30.460 --> 0:12:33.500
<v Speaker 3>would be incredible. But I would say go to any

0:12:33.620 --> 0:12:36.160
<v Speaker 3>quarterback on any team and take away all those assets.

0:12:36.760 --> 0:12:39.000
<v Speaker 3>They're probably not beating a Jags team that we view

0:12:39.040 --> 0:12:41.020
<v Speaker 3>now as what, a top five, top six team in

0:12:41.040 --> 0:12:43.840
<v Speaker 3>the NFL right now. So it's just a really horrible spot.

0:12:43.880 --> 0:12:47.040
<v Speaker 3>So Taking the number, I'll be happily surprised if they

0:12:47.080 --> 0:12:50.100
<v Speaker 3>actually win this game outright, but we've just seen the Jags.

0:12:50.120 --> 0:12:52.820
<v Speaker 2>They own England. They're just great there, and favorites are

0:12:52.840 --> 0:12:53.800
<v Speaker 2>a great covering there.

0:12:54.960 --> 0:12:56.740
<v Speaker 3>Another game I'm happy we can avoid for our contest

0:12:56.760 --> 0:12:58.620
<v Speaker 3>because it's so tempting to put this one in, but

0:12:59.559 --> 0:13:01.620
<v Speaker 3>I know better, and I'll just wait and see for

0:13:01.640 --> 0:13:02.160
<v Speaker 3>the Seagulls team.

0:13:02.559 --> 0:13:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota at New Orleans. This one was Simon Says. New

0:13:05.700 --> 0:13:10.339
<v Speaker 1>Orleans is down to 1.5. It started at 2.5. It

0:13:10.380 --> 0:13:16.179
<v Speaker 1>was at 2 on Tuesday when we made it Simon Says. Basically,

0:13:16.220 --> 0:13:18.660
<v Speaker 1>this is a sharp move. Like the majority of the

0:13:18.700 --> 0:13:22.140
<v Speaker 1>tickets are on the Vikings, a little bit more than 50%

0:13:22.140 --> 0:13:25.850
<v Speaker 1>of the money on the Vikings, but definitely it's sharp

0:13:25.920 --> 0:13:30.530
<v Speaker 1>money that is moving this number in the direction of

0:13:30.550 --> 0:13:35.790
<v Speaker 1>the Saints. Has anything changed in your opinion on this game?

0:13:37.870 --> 0:13:39.330
<v Speaker 3>No, like, like that's why I want to get two

0:13:39.350 --> 0:13:40.550
<v Speaker 3>and a half though, because I want to get every

0:13:40.590 --> 0:13:43.850
<v Speaker 3>number I can just because we've seen these glaring weaknesses

0:13:43.950 --> 0:13:44.670
<v Speaker 3>on the Saints team.

0:13:45.429 --> 0:13:48.020
<v Speaker 2>And I feel like if the pros keep betting it,

0:13:48.220 --> 0:13:48.929
<v Speaker 2>it could have flipped.

0:13:48.960 --> 0:13:51.059
<v Speaker 3>And that's why it's like, all right, get the, get

0:13:51.100 --> 0:13:52.700
<v Speaker 3>the two and a half now, because I knew the

0:13:52.720 --> 0:13:54.000
<v Speaker 3>pros would come in on it. Cause it's such a,

0:13:54.020 --> 0:13:56.560
<v Speaker 3>I wouldn't call it a lazy spot, but it really

0:13:56.620 --> 0:13:58.959
<v Speaker 3>is where it's, we all know the Vikings are overrated

0:13:59.000 --> 0:14:01.679
<v Speaker 3>right now, right? They're not one of the, they're not

0:14:01.720 --> 0:14:02.179
<v Speaker 3>the chiefs.

0:14:02.220 --> 0:14:04.830
<v Speaker 2>We're also four and up. They're just, they're not comparable.

0:14:05.050 --> 0:14:07.050
<v Speaker 3>We could see the chiefs continue to success the rest

0:14:07.070 --> 0:14:09.910
<v Speaker 3>of the season, Minnesota, the public, I think still is

0:14:09.929 --> 0:14:12.450
<v Speaker 3>unsure about them as well. Cause Kyler, he hasn't been

0:14:12.490 --> 0:14:14.829
<v Speaker 3>laying the word on either since he started, he's been playing. So,

0:14:15.340 --> 0:14:17.220
<v Speaker 3>That's really what this position is about. I still don't

0:14:17.240 --> 0:14:20.370
<v Speaker 3>think Kyle is comfortable yet. And as great as the

0:14:20.410 --> 0:14:23.550
<v Speaker 3>Vikings defense has been, we have seen in the past,

0:14:24.350 --> 0:14:27.710
<v Speaker 3>they are susceptible to being passed on. Like as you know,

0:14:27.750 --> 0:14:31.090
<v Speaker 3>we've seen before, like they, they blitz heavy. If a

0:14:31.150 --> 0:14:33.400
<v Speaker 3>quarterback can read the blitz and know where his number,

0:14:33.640 --> 0:14:35.480
<v Speaker 3>his go route is, or his hot rate, his hot

0:14:35.540 --> 0:14:38.360
<v Speaker 3>read is he can tear up the Vikings defense. And

0:14:38.900 --> 0:14:41.360
<v Speaker 3>that's the way blind Flores does it. He's like, okay,

0:14:42.140 --> 0:14:44.080
<v Speaker 3>beat me for a touchdown or I'm sacking you. And

0:14:44.100 --> 0:14:46.580
<v Speaker 3>now you're in third and 20. Like he's just, he

0:14:46.620 --> 0:14:48.920
<v Speaker 3>knows the risk he's taking because the defense doesn't have

0:14:49.340 --> 0:14:51.260
<v Speaker 3>a bunch of studs. It's a bunch of just guys.

0:14:51.600 --> 0:14:53.780
<v Speaker 3>And that's, what's been so oppressive. I mean, you look

0:14:53.840 --> 0:14:57.090
<v Speaker 3>at their defense, I think they're rated number one. And

0:14:57.110 --> 0:15:00.370
<v Speaker 3>then they're so far above EPA per play. They're like

0:15:00.490 --> 0:15:02.930
<v Speaker 3>a full point above Seattle. Who's the number two defense.

0:15:02.990 --> 0:15:07.110
<v Speaker 3>It's just Minnesota's defense has been so insane. You expect

0:15:07.150 --> 0:15:08.910
<v Speaker 3>to come back down to earth at some point. So,

0:15:09.670 --> 0:15:12.170
<v Speaker 3>Saints team coming off a really bad, embarrassing loss.

0:15:12.490 --> 0:15:13.190
<v Speaker 2>Public eye.

0:15:13.610 --> 0:15:14.770
<v Speaker 3>We just knew we were going to get a free

0:15:14.810 --> 0:15:17.410
<v Speaker 3>point or two here. I still think you're still getting it.

0:15:17.450 --> 0:15:20.510
<v Speaker 3>Like the Saints being a pick them in this feels

0:15:20.550 --> 0:15:22.040
<v Speaker 3>more right. So you're still getting a point and a

0:15:22.030 --> 0:15:23.880
<v Speaker 3>half of value. If you want to take the Saints,

0:15:23.890 --> 0:15:25.420
<v Speaker 3>but that's why I gave it out on a Tuesday.

0:15:25.460 --> 0:15:27.140
<v Speaker 3>It's like grab it two and a half. Now it's

0:15:27.180 --> 0:15:29.520
<v Speaker 3>a key number. It could still get back there. I

0:15:29.540 --> 0:15:32.440
<v Speaker 3>still think the public comes Sunday. We'll back this Vikings

0:15:32.480 --> 0:15:35.940
<v Speaker 3>team and we might get back to it, but no,

0:15:35.960 --> 0:15:37.860
<v Speaker 3>I'm not slamming the table now to make people take

0:15:37.900 --> 0:15:38.780
<v Speaker 3>it a plus one, plus.

0:15:38.660 --> 0:15:39.080
<v Speaker 2>One and a half.

0:15:39.770 --> 0:15:42.010
<v Speaker 1>I think you and I both still believe a little

0:15:42.050 --> 0:15:47.710
<v Speaker 1>bit in Tyler Schuch and the magic he can concoct

0:15:47.770 --> 0:15:50.890
<v Speaker 1>at the end of games when he's just slinging it

0:15:51.450 --> 0:15:55.590
<v Speaker 1>and they're moving down the field and he has no fear.

0:15:56.530 --> 0:15:59.290
<v Speaker 1>It tends to work to our advantage when we're betting

0:15:59.350 --> 0:16:03.100
<v Speaker 1>on the Saints. Obviously, last week for fans, it didn't.

0:16:03.510 --> 0:16:05.960
<v Speaker 1>And we were happy to be on the Falcons. But

0:16:06.260 --> 0:16:09.150
<v Speaker 1>as you said, he's going to get blitzed. if he

0:16:09.170 --> 0:16:11.030
<v Speaker 1>can get the ball off, if he can get that

0:16:11.110 --> 0:16:14.510
<v Speaker 1>millisecond of protection, he is going to find opportunities to

0:16:14.550 --> 0:16:18.170
<v Speaker 1>hit guys downfield that play to the Saints' advantage in

0:16:18.190 --> 0:16:22.060
<v Speaker 1>a game like this. All right. It is time for

0:16:22.980 --> 0:16:29.740
<v Speaker 1>our Brass Balls Trade of the Week, presented by Polymarket.

0:16:29.800 --> 0:16:32.380
<v Speaker 1>And that is going to be, get ready for it,

0:16:32.380 --> 0:16:38.210
<v Speaker 1>because there was a big debate, big debate. The Washington...

0:16:38.160 --> 0:16:44.660
<v Speaker 1>commanders trading at three and a half on Polymarket at 52%.

0:16:44.660 --> 0:16:48.330
<v Speaker 1>You know what it takes?

0:16:48.990 --> 0:16:50.550
<v Speaker 2>It takes brass balls.

0:16:51.210 --> 0:16:58.390
<v Speaker 1>All right. Washington commanders trading at three and a half, 52%

0:16:58.390 --> 0:17:05.000
<v Speaker 1>on Polymarket. That is our brass balls trade of the week. Look,

0:17:05.040 --> 0:17:10.260
<v Speaker 1>I think... this is largely about Jaden Daniels being expected

0:17:10.320 --> 0:17:13.100
<v Speaker 1>to play. He was a full participant in practice this week.

0:17:14.680 --> 0:17:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Jameis is feeling himself coming off of a big, big

0:17:18.700 --> 0:17:25.869
<v Speaker 1>upset win at home. It's interesting to me, 80% of

0:17:25.890 --> 0:17:28.409
<v Speaker 1>the tickets are on the, more than 80% of the

0:17:28.450 --> 0:17:33.250
<v Speaker 1>tickets are on the Giants right now. So I like

0:17:33.330 --> 0:17:37.580
<v Speaker 1>going with the commanders here. It's weird to have a

0:17:37.640 --> 0:17:42.490
<v Speaker 1>brass balls be a more than a field goal favorite,

0:17:43.450 --> 0:17:46.230
<v Speaker 1>but there's so much public sentiment for the Giants here.

0:17:46.970 --> 0:17:48.669
<v Speaker 1>That's why I feel like it qualifies for us.

0:17:50.330 --> 0:17:53.459
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's also how rare is a three-in-one team is

0:17:53.540 --> 0:17:59.120
<v Speaker 3>a three-and-a-half-point dog to a one-in-three team. Normally, me, Chad,

0:17:59.140 --> 0:18:01.340
<v Speaker 3>would be all over the Giants, right? Divisional dog, getting

0:18:01.359 --> 0:18:04.070
<v Speaker 3>the hook. But I feel like you need to talk

0:18:04.090 --> 0:18:06.730
<v Speaker 3>about Jameis, right? You got Jameis feeling himself after a

0:18:06.770 --> 0:18:10.030
<v Speaker 3>big win. This is the exact game Jameis throws us

0:18:10.050 --> 0:18:12.560
<v Speaker 3>like four picks. I mean, it's just these are the

0:18:12.580 --> 0:18:14.139
<v Speaker 3>type of games he just totally lays an egg. And

0:18:14.540 --> 0:18:16.880
<v Speaker 3>Janie Daniels plays really well in these type of matchups.

0:18:16.960 --> 0:18:20.940
<v Speaker 3>And we've seen this year this Giants defense. They've also

0:18:20.980 --> 0:18:24.520
<v Speaker 3>struggled against more wild quarterbacks. And, you know, as much

0:18:24.600 --> 0:18:26.850
<v Speaker 3>as I like to hate on Dan Quinn, The one

0:18:26.869 --> 0:18:28.790
<v Speaker 3>thing he does well is he beats the Giants. I

0:18:28.810 --> 0:18:30.729
<v Speaker 3>think in his career, he's 6-0 straight up and he's

0:18:30.750 --> 0:18:35.149
<v Speaker 3>5-1 against the spread since 2015. So he just, he

0:18:35.250 --> 0:18:38.169
<v Speaker 3>always does well coaching against the Giants in this division, especially.

0:18:38.550 --> 0:18:42.690
<v Speaker 3>And I get why the public is backing the Giants, right?

0:18:42.710 --> 0:18:44.330
<v Speaker 3>They have so many questions about this Washington team. I

0:18:44.770 --> 0:18:47.490
<v Speaker 3>think it's been sneakily underrated how good this Washington team

0:18:47.530 --> 0:18:49.320
<v Speaker 3>has gotten each week. Like I know last week they

0:18:49.359 --> 0:18:52.420
<v Speaker 3>lost to the Colts. They were playing really tough until

0:18:52.440 --> 0:18:54.119
<v Speaker 3>Mary got knocked to that game and they kind of

0:18:54.140 --> 0:18:56.310
<v Speaker 3>just gave it away in the second half. So, I

0:18:56.350 --> 0:18:59.310
<v Speaker 3>think the defense has been improving under Quinn. We've seen

0:18:59.390 --> 0:19:04.010
<v Speaker 3>this offense. When Jaden is in there, they're pretty dang good. So, yeah,

0:19:04.070 --> 0:19:05.530
<v Speaker 3>it just feels like a nice bounce back shot for

0:19:05.550 --> 0:19:07.610
<v Speaker 3>this community and a letdown game for this Giants team.

0:19:09.369 --> 0:19:14.129
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you about the defense. Sonny Stiles, as

0:19:14.190 --> 0:19:18.290
<v Speaker 1>a linebacker, has been incredibly good. I feel like they

0:19:18.369 --> 0:19:23.210
<v Speaker 1>are improving. What are you seeing when you watch Sonny Stiles?

0:19:23.230 --> 0:19:27.460
<v Speaker 1>Because that, to me... could be a game-changing pick for

0:19:27.480 --> 0:19:31.740
<v Speaker 1>them that solidifies what could have been a terrible, terrible defense.

0:19:33.640 --> 0:19:35.540
<v Speaker 3>We said it coming out about Sonny, though. He had

0:19:35.580 --> 0:19:38.820
<v Speaker 3>no weaknesses. That was his whole– everyone talking about coming

0:19:38.859 --> 0:19:41.290
<v Speaker 3>out of Ohio State. This kid is just a guaranteed–

0:19:41.600 --> 0:19:44.300
<v Speaker 3>you're going to draft him. He'll be a linebacker for

0:19:44.320 --> 0:19:45.859
<v Speaker 3>you for the next 10 to 15 years. Just an

0:19:45.900 --> 0:19:49.609
<v Speaker 3>absolute stud. He's been above what they said. He is

0:19:50.240 --> 0:19:52.439
<v Speaker 3>great at rushing the quarterbacks. He's great in coverage. He's

0:19:52.480 --> 0:19:55.100
<v Speaker 3>great at reading the quarterback's eyes. He's great at against

0:19:55.119 --> 0:19:57.639
<v Speaker 3>the run. He just does it all. And I mean,

0:19:57.660 --> 0:20:00.010
<v Speaker 3>he talked about it last week. He didn't play well enough.

0:20:00.090 --> 0:20:02.510
<v Speaker 3>He got, he got bullied around. And I, that's another

0:20:02.530 --> 0:20:04.790
<v Speaker 3>reason I like him to bounce back. It's that coach

0:20:04.810 --> 0:20:07.070
<v Speaker 3>team is a well-oiled machine when they're running with Jonathan Taylor.

0:20:07.570 --> 0:20:09.550
<v Speaker 3>It's not the same with the Giants. It just simply

0:20:09.590 --> 0:20:13.030
<v Speaker 3>is not. So, yeah, like I said, I was a

0:20:13.050 --> 0:20:14.530
<v Speaker 3>game I was hoping was going to drop. But we've

0:20:14.570 --> 0:20:17.189
<v Speaker 3>seen obviously professional money has held this the commander's number up.

0:20:17.230 --> 0:20:19.360
<v Speaker 3>So let's take it as is. If it got back,

0:20:19.460 --> 0:20:21.899
<v Speaker 3>if it got the three, that'd be great. But I

0:20:21.920 --> 0:20:24.040
<v Speaker 3>just don't see Polymarket dropping a blow three and a half.

0:20:24.100 --> 0:20:25.679
<v Speaker 3>It's just it's just so much respect the money right

0:20:25.700 --> 0:20:26.760
<v Speaker 3>now back in this commander's team.

0:20:27.460 --> 0:20:29.359
<v Speaker 1>All right. Well, speaking of Polymarket, I do need to

0:20:29.400 --> 0:20:33.280
<v Speaker 1>tell you about this new prediction market called Polymarket. It's

0:20:33.340 --> 0:20:36.140
<v Speaker 1>the best new way to trade in sports in the past.

0:20:36.720 --> 0:20:38.800
<v Speaker 1>If you wanted action on the game, you'd put some

0:20:38.820 --> 0:20:40.540
<v Speaker 1>money in. And if your team was doing well and

0:20:40.560 --> 0:20:43.070
<v Speaker 1>you wanted to cash out, they'd lock the trade or

0:20:43.090 --> 0:20:46.530
<v Speaker 1>take a huge fee. But Polymarket is a prediction market,

0:20:46.590 --> 0:20:50.570
<v Speaker 1>a stock exchange for sports where you can buy and

0:20:50.650 --> 0:20:53.790
<v Speaker 1>sell on your teams. I've tried them all. And Polymarket

0:20:53.830 --> 0:20:57.410
<v Speaker 1>is simply the best prediction market. They're so confident. You'll

0:20:57.490 --> 0:21:00.250
<v Speaker 1>never go back to the other guys. They're giving you

0:21:00.310 --> 0:21:04.130
<v Speaker 1>a free $ 25 on your first trade when you deposit

0:21:04.150 --> 0:21:08.230
<v Speaker 1>just $ 10. And now they've launched a new feature called Squads,

0:21:08.430 --> 0:21:10.840
<v Speaker 1>a group chat where you can see what everyone is

0:21:10.880 --> 0:21:13.200
<v Speaker 1>trading on. Check the link in the description to join

0:21:13.240 --> 0:21:16.760
<v Speaker 1>my squad today. It's what picks together every Sunday in

0:21:16.780 --> 0:21:20.919
<v Speaker 1>the Polymarket app. So download the Polymarket app today and

0:21:21.119 --> 0:21:24.979
<v Speaker 1>use Sharp when you sign up. That's Sharp to get

0:21:24.980 --> 0:21:30.790
<v Speaker 1>$ 25 free after you deposit just $ 10. Simon, we brought

0:21:30.850 --> 0:21:33.830
<v Speaker 1>it up in the Sharp calls. Cincinnati is visiting Miami today.

0:21:34.359 --> 0:21:38.340
<v Speaker 1>The number has moved from touchdown from seven down to

0:21:38.400 --> 0:21:41.020
<v Speaker 1>six and a half. It is all wise guy of money.

0:21:41.500 --> 0:21:44.899
<v Speaker 1>We talked about it on Tuesday. Miami had to be

0:21:44.940 --> 0:21:48.590
<v Speaker 1>the side that you played. We knew it was going

0:21:48.609 --> 0:21:53.290
<v Speaker 1>to be a sharp play on Miami. Seven is such

0:21:53.310 --> 0:21:56.609
<v Speaker 1>a key number in these games. It's just so important.

0:21:57.150 --> 0:22:00.310
<v Speaker 1>It's why we're waffling on and we'll get to Houston

0:22:00.330 --> 0:22:03.209
<v Speaker 1>and but why we're waffling on Houston at seven and

0:22:03.230 --> 0:22:05.210
<v Speaker 1>a half. And it's also why I think we're waffling

0:22:05.290 --> 0:22:06.550
<v Speaker 1>on Miami at six and a half.

0:22:09.210 --> 0:22:12.300
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's a little bit, it's, we know we're supposed

0:22:12.320 --> 0:22:12.639
<v Speaker 2>to do it.

0:22:12.660 --> 0:22:15.020
<v Speaker 3>It's just like last week we missed Miami cause they

0:22:15.040 --> 0:22:17.060
<v Speaker 3>moved off a 10 and a half. We should have

0:22:17.080 --> 0:22:21.210
<v Speaker 3>played it cause it was 10 and a half. But yeah, I, I,

0:22:21.420 --> 0:22:23.600
<v Speaker 3>I get why the pros are betting. We said it's such,

0:22:24.440 --> 0:22:26.010
<v Speaker 3>it's too big of a number once again for the

0:22:26.050 --> 0:22:28.129
<v Speaker 3>dolphins and it's why you keep playing them. And it's

0:22:28.150 --> 0:22:32.100
<v Speaker 3>going to be like this every week for us. but

0:22:32.140 --> 0:22:34.399
<v Speaker 3>at this, this one is really telling because now they're just,

0:22:34.520 --> 0:22:38.120
<v Speaker 3>they're letting the public bet. The Bengals is just straight

0:22:38.160 --> 0:22:40.800
<v Speaker 3>up winning teasers. Now, now you're just, you're down to

0:22:40.840 --> 0:22:43.359
<v Speaker 3>six point teasers. You're down to half. You're just, all

0:22:43.380 --> 0:22:44.740
<v Speaker 3>you need is the Bengals to win by a point

0:22:44.800 --> 0:22:48.280
<v Speaker 3>and you win that bet. Same exact movement last week

0:22:48.300 --> 0:22:50.240
<v Speaker 3>with the bills. So it's always telling when the books

0:22:50.290 --> 0:22:52.710
<v Speaker 3>do this, they try to make these little trap lines

0:22:52.750 --> 0:22:55.530
<v Speaker 3>and teasers as well. This one jumps out now where

0:22:55.550 --> 0:22:58.209
<v Speaker 3>it's like, I wanted to play Bengals in my, you know,

0:22:58.760 --> 0:23:01.540
<v Speaker 3>my survivor pool. Now it's a little worrisome where it's like,

0:23:02.180 --> 0:23:04.260
<v Speaker 3>I can't believe that the books have moved this number.

0:23:04.300 --> 0:23:06.500
<v Speaker 3>Now it could be a head fake and they could

0:23:06.520 --> 0:23:08.940
<v Speaker 3>just be trying to get people following professional money and

0:23:08.980 --> 0:23:11.700
<v Speaker 3>betting the dolphins and then not betting the bangles and

0:23:11.720 --> 0:23:13.300
<v Speaker 3>all that. And that's, that is part of what the

0:23:13.359 --> 0:23:16.950
<v Speaker 3>books do here. Um, but that's really telling the books

0:23:17.190 --> 0:23:19.949
<v Speaker 3>would move and take a position on this number. Not

0:23:19.990 --> 0:23:22.980
<v Speaker 3>even Saturday, they're doing this Wednesday and now they've done it.

0:23:23.010 --> 0:23:24.350
<v Speaker 3>They've held it Thursday morning here.

0:23:24.430 --> 0:23:26.189
<v Speaker 2>So yeah. Yeah.

0:23:26.560 --> 0:23:28.119
<v Speaker 3>We know what we're supposed to do here, Chad. No

0:23:28.140 --> 0:23:31.170
<v Speaker 3>matter what, you're supposed to bet this Dolphins team. You're

0:23:31.190 --> 0:23:34.490
<v Speaker 3>supposed to ride with the books because it's a long-term spot,

0:23:34.530 --> 0:23:37.869
<v Speaker 3>long-term winner if you back the books here. So pretty,

0:23:37.950 --> 0:23:39.389
<v Speaker 3>pretty scary. I don't know what I'm going to do

0:23:39.410 --> 0:23:42.889
<v Speaker 3>survivor anymore. I might still take my note. I shouldn't

0:23:42.950 --> 0:23:45.550
<v Speaker 3>in every contest. Maybe I'll just do half now on

0:23:45.590 --> 0:23:47.030
<v Speaker 3>the Bengals because I don't know what I'm going to

0:23:47.109 --> 0:23:49.949
<v Speaker 3>use them again. But I can't believe the books think

0:23:49.990 --> 0:23:51.570
<v Speaker 3>this is one of the games the Dolphins are going

0:23:51.609 --> 0:23:51.910
<v Speaker 3>to win.

0:23:52.890 --> 0:23:53.780
<v Speaker 2>I know they're going to win one.

0:23:53.690 --> 0:23:55.740
<v Speaker 3>Or maybe two games this year. It's just the way

0:23:55.780 --> 0:23:57.869
<v Speaker 3>the league is. I think their win total still is

0:23:57.890 --> 0:24:01.050
<v Speaker 3>two and a half. Their updated win total, the Dolphins,

0:24:01.109 --> 0:24:03.930
<v Speaker 3>but I just, I could not believe this line movement.

0:24:03.950 --> 0:24:06.369
<v Speaker 3>Cause like you said, it's all the money, all the bets,

0:24:06.410 --> 0:24:09.240
<v Speaker 3>it's all bangles. So it's really, really respectively. Like I,

0:24:09.590 --> 0:24:12.090
<v Speaker 3>I said, I bet the Dolphins not for it to

0:24:12.150 --> 0:24:14.260
<v Speaker 3>move like someone to move this number. It's a really

0:24:14.300 --> 0:24:16.680
<v Speaker 3>respected group taking a large position on this Dolphins side.

0:24:16.740 --> 0:24:19.419
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, interesting number to keep track of this week.

0:24:19.460 --> 0:24:21.960
<v Speaker 3>If it's, you know, like I'm saying to people, you

0:24:21.980 --> 0:24:23.939
<v Speaker 3>could grab it now just in case more professional when

0:24:23.980 --> 0:24:25.320
<v Speaker 3>it comes in and drives us down to five and

0:24:25.340 --> 0:24:28.060
<v Speaker 3>a half. It just, That's a real possibility now, but

0:24:28.560 --> 0:24:29.879
<v Speaker 3>we're all hoping it gets back to seven.

0:24:29.900 --> 0:24:30.440
<v Speaker 2>Seven and a half.

0:24:31.280 --> 0:24:33.219
<v Speaker 1>The survivor thing is so tough and we'll get to

0:24:33.260 --> 0:24:35.879
<v Speaker 1>it because a couple of the more obvious teams, the

0:24:35.920 --> 0:24:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Bengals and Texans, huge road favorites. And that is a

0:24:41.000 --> 0:24:45.440
<v Speaker 1>recipe for survivor bloodbath, but there are not a lot

0:24:45.480 --> 0:24:50.899
<v Speaker 1>of really obvious options. We'll get to that. A lot

0:24:51.000 --> 0:24:56.280
<v Speaker 1>of people coming around to the idea and, You've specifically

0:24:56.340 --> 0:24:58.220
<v Speaker 1>said this, but we've talked a lot about this with

0:24:58.240 --> 0:25:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Joe Burrow. It's becoming more and more obvious that the Bengals'

0:25:03.540 --> 0:25:08.090
<v Speaker 1>failings are on his shoulders. You had a stat the

0:25:08.130 --> 0:25:11.530
<v Speaker 1>other day about Joe Burrow that we had gotten from

0:25:11.710 --> 0:25:16.750
<v Speaker 1>our friend and benevolent boss, Colin Cowherd, and his performance

0:25:16.790 --> 0:25:21.859
<v Speaker 1>late in games. He's not getting it done. And that

0:25:21.960 --> 0:25:25.300
<v Speaker 1>is what makes me most nervous about betting on the

0:25:25.340 --> 0:25:28.159
<v Speaker 1>Bengals from a survivor point of view, but also at

0:25:28.200 --> 0:25:31.520
<v Speaker 1>a relatively big number, is he just continues to not

0:25:31.540 --> 0:25:33.949
<v Speaker 1>get it done. And these things, the way he performs,

0:25:34.330 --> 0:25:37.210
<v Speaker 1>the way he holds onto the ball, those are habitual.

0:25:37.250 --> 0:25:39.909
<v Speaker 1>Those are ingrained. Those aren't things that you all of

0:25:39.950 --> 0:25:41.890
<v Speaker 1>a sudden change. That's a little bit of hero ball

0:25:42.650 --> 0:25:45.230
<v Speaker 1>to me, which is also one of the reasons why

0:25:45.290 --> 0:25:48.020
<v Speaker 1>I think we want to be wary of betting on

0:25:48.040 --> 0:25:49.119
<v Speaker 1>the Bengals in a spot like this.

0:25:51.090 --> 0:25:53.490
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and that stat had Bengals fans in their feelings.

0:25:53.530 --> 0:25:55.590
<v Speaker 3>They were really upset about that one.

0:25:56.109 --> 0:25:59.770
<v Speaker 2>I had a bunch of people upset. I probably should address.

0:25:59.490 --> 0:26:01.670
<v Speaker 3>The Tuesday thing. I have people so upset, Chad. I

0:26:01.690 --> 0:26:03.030
<v Speaker 3>don't know why I glazed over it. I probably should

0:26:03.050 --> 0:26:05.170
<v Speaker 3>start the show with it. My whole point, I wasn't

0:26:05.210 --> 0:26:07.449
<v Speaker 3>saying I'm better than people. My whole point is I'm

0:26:07.490 --> 0:26:09.650
<v Speaker 3>not here to sell you anything. I would do this

0:26:10.070 --> 0:26:12.379
<v Speaker 3>for free was my whole point. I love Chad. I

0:26:12.410 --> 0:26:14.580
<v Speaker 3>love doing the show with Chad. Love the fans of

0:26:14.600 --> 0:26:16.659
<v Speaker 3>the show. Even fans who hate me and talk shit

0:26:16.680 --> 0:26:19.060
<v Speaker 3>to me in public. it's always with laughs. Like it's

0:26:19.119 --> 0:26:20.920
<v Speaker 3>never that serious. It's not that deep.

0:26:21.040 --> 0:26:24.540
<v Speaker 2>Like people throw these hissy fits online in public. It's

0:26:24.580 --> 0:26:26.560
<v Speaker 2>never that deep. We can have a laugh. It's, it's

0:26:26.600 --> 0:26:30.250
<v Speaker 2>all for fun. But the bigger point is we want

0:26:30.270 --> 0:26:30.990
<v Speaker 2>to win bad.

0:26:30.830 --> 0:26:32.690
<v Speaker 3>On this show. I hope people understand. We don't take

0:26:32.730 --> 0:26:34.470
<v Speaker 3>this show lightly. We know how many people listen and

0:26:34.869 --> 0:26:38.050
<v Speaker 3>we care deeply about this show. Back to Joe Burrow.

0:26:38.250 --> 0:26:39.710
<v Speaker 3>I wasn't trying to take shots at him. It was

0:26:39.750 --> 0:26:42.350
<v Speaker 3>just a coward stat he gave out that I found

0:26:42.390 --> 0:26:44.520
<v Speaker 3>really interesting. I think Chad found it interesting as well.

0:26:44.580 --> 0:26:47.370
<v Speaker 3>It's like, If a guy's 1-34 in games when there's

0:26:47.430 --> 0:26:49.210
<v Speaker 3>eight minutes left and he's either tied or losing in

0:26:49.230 --> 0:26:51.750
<v Speaker 3>the game and he doesn't come back, yes, it's a

0:26:51.770 --> 0:26:54.889
<v Speaker 3>stupid stat, but it's just interesting. It's like, okay, Joe

0:26:54.950 --> 0:26:57.270
<v Speaker 3>in these games, we've had back-to-back weeks where he's kind

0:26:57.290 --> 0:27:01.250
<v Speaker 3>of blown it. That was the whole point. And Joe's future,

0:27:01.290 --> 0:27:03.270
<v Speaker 3>I feel like I already see it playing out. Joe

0:27:03.730 --> 0:27:05.689
<v Speaker 3>leaves the Bengals in two years, goes to Denver with

0:27:05.710 --> 0:27:06.830
<v Speaker 3>Sean Payton and wins the Super Bowl.

0:27:07.190 --> 0:27:08.129
<v Speaker 2>Something horrible like that.

0:27:08.150 --> 0:27:09.850
<v Speaker 3>I just feel so bad for these Bengals fans where

0:27:10.530 --> 0:27:12.960
<v Speaker 3>it felt like they had a guy And now he's

0:27:13.000 --> 0:27:14.320
<v Speaker 3>missed the playoffs three years in a row. And you

0:27:14.340 --> 0:27:16.480
<v Speaker 3>could say, well, it's not his fault. And no one

0:27:16.520 --> 0:27:19.070
<v Speaker 3>is blaming him totally. It is a team game. But

0:27:19.770 --> 0:27:21.350
<v Speaker 3>here we are through four weeks, and this team could

0:27:21.369 --> 0:27:21.770
<v Speaker 3>be 4-0.

0:27:21.890 --> 0:27:22.210
<v Speaker 2>They're 2-2.

0:27:22.270 --> 0:27:25.850
<v Speaker 3>And now the line's moving against them in Miami. If

0:27:25.869 --> 0:27:29.050
<v Speaker 3>they lose this game against Miami, now they're 2-3, panic

0:27:29.109 --> 0:27:30.730
<v Speaker 3>is going to be at the highest level ever in

0:27:30.770 --> 0:27:33.650
<v Speaker 3>Joe Burrow's career. Like, this is– I mean, it's hell

0:27:33.690 --> 0:27:35.830
<v Speaker 3>in Philadelphia right now. It's going to be no different

0:27:35.850 --> 0:27:39.879
<v Speaker 3>than Cincinnati. Like, the sky will be falling. So, yeah,

0:27:39.900 --> 0:27:43.699
<v Speaker 3>I just– That was my whole point about that Joe Burrows.

0:27:43.720 --> 0:27:45.480
<v Speaker 3>I didn't know Bengals fans were going to get so

0:27:45.500 --> 0:27:48.560
<v Speaker 3>upset about it. It's just a stat. We're not picking sides.

0:27:48.580 --> 0:27:51.460
<v Speaker 3>We're not saying this or that. We're just simply giving

0:27:51.480 --> 0:27:52.159
<v Speaker 3>out a stat.

0:27:53.680 --> 0:27:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Listen, you know how I feel about comments. Comments are content.

0:27:57.480 --> 0:28:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Feedback is a gift. Everybody, just keep them coming. The

0:28:02.040 --> 0:28:05.480
<v Speaker 1>next game we've got to talk about. The Cleveland Browns

0:28:05.600 --> 0:28:11.280
<v Speaker 1>visiting the New York Jets. The game's been waffling. One

0:28:11.320 --> 0:28:13.580
<v Speaker 1>and a half, two and a half, two, one and

0:28:13.619 --> 0:28:15.340
<v Speaker 1>a half. You can kind of get it at one

0:28:15.359 --> 0:28:17.800
<v Speaker 1>and a half and two in a lot of places

0:28:18.200 --> 0:28:20.440
<v Speaker 1>right now. I can see I'm looking at the odd

0:28:20.480 --> 0:28:28.459
<v Speaker 1>screen right now. Very interesting game. Potentially really bad weather

0:28:28.820 --> 0:28:32.699
<v Speaker 1>in New York on Sunday. I want to be on

0:28:32.720 --> 0:28:36.359
<v Speaker 1>the Jets here. I think you would like to also,

0:28:36.400 --> 0:28:38.479
<v Speaker 1>but the weather is scaring us because we saw how

0:28:38.530 --> 0:28:43.190
<v Speaker 1>badly Geno played and whether earlier this season against the Packers.

0:28:43.930 --> 0:28:45.990
<v Speaker 1>And we know Brees Hall isn't going to be playing.

0:28:47.230 --> 0:28:51.470
<v Speaker 1>The Browns are such a public dog right now. Them

0:28:51.510 --> 0:28:56.680
<v Speaker 1>and the Giants are massive, massive public dogs on the

0:28:56.740 --> 0:29:01.540
<v Speaker 1>road right now. Here's a great quote. This is from

0:29:01.580 --> 0:29:04.840
<v Speaker 1>one of our comments, by the way. Comments are content

0:29:04.960 --> 0:29:08.700
<v Speaker 1>from a YouTube viewer. As a Jets fan, I can

0:29:08.740 --> 0:29:15.900
<v Speaker 1>tell you for sure There are never any Jets spots ever.

0:29:15.920 --> 0:29:19.340
<v Speaker 1>Is this a Jets spot, Simon?

0:29:21.120 --> 0:29:23.280
<v Speaker 3>It was until Mother Nature might be stepping in and

0:29:23.300 --> 0:29:26.060
<v Speaker 3>ruining all of our amazing plans for this one. Because

0:29:26.100 --> 0:29:27.900
<v Speaker 3>we just, we knew the Browns were going to be

0:29:27.940 --> 0:29:30.410
<v Speaker 3>a huge public dog, right? We saw it Sunday night.

0:29:30.450 --> 0:29:33.110
<v Speaker 3>As soon as you saw this line open, it's like, oh,

0:29:33.450 --> 0:29:36.590
<v Speaker 3>why are the Browns not favorites here? Like they played

0:29:36.610 --> 0:29:39.370
<v Speaker 3>better this year. They have aesthetic rest. And we've seen

0:29:39.390 --> 0:29:41.540
<v Speaker 3>the stats here teams off extended rest have been really

0:29:41.580 --> 0:29:45.000
<v Speaker 3>good especially against the spread this season so um very

0:29:45.060 --> 0:29:47.840
<v Speaker 3>very fishy line that immediately we were like okay we'll

0:29:47.880 --> 0:29:50.160
<v Speaker 3>probably be on the jets here and then you see

0:29:50.180 --> 0:29:52.940
<v Speaker 3>it 90 of the bets 90 of the money are

0:29:53.060 --> 0:29:55.990
<v Speaker 3>on the browns and you're like oh my god is

0:29:56.090 --> 0:29:58.250
<v Speaker 3>it really is it really that easy because sometimes it

0:29:58.290 --> 0:30:00.570
<v Speaker 3>really is where it's like You don't even think. You

0:30:00.590 --> 0:30:02.590
<v Speaker 3>just back the Jets, and it's another long-term winner.

0:30:02.630 --> 0:30:04.290
<v Speaker 2>So that's what we meant. It's a Jets spot.

0:30:04.450 --> 0:30:06.270
<v Speaker 3>I get what that Jets fan is saying.

0:30:07.470 --> 0:30:10.340
<v Speaker 2>It's been rough since Sanchez, man. I hear you guys.

0:30:10.390 --> 0:30:13.080
<v Speaker 2>But if we get worried that it's not.

0:30:13.060 --> 0:30:15.440
<v Speaker 3>Supposed to rain during this game, we got Geno in

0:30:15.460 --> 0:30:18.140
<v Speaker 3>a nice 65-degree fall day, Chad.

0:30:19.080 --> 0:30:20.360
<v Speaker 2>This is the spot we back him.

0:30:20.380 --> 0:30:23.060
<v Speaker 3>This is the exact spot this Jets team rolls this

0:30:23.120 --> 0:30:25.440
<v Speaker 3>Browns team where the hype is peaked. But this is

0:30:25.480 --> 0:30:27.340
<v Speaker 3>also really exciting if you're a Browns fan because the

0:30:27.360 --> 0:30:29.380
<v Speaker 3>Browns go in and win this type of trap game.

0:30:30.010 --> 0:30:32.210
<v Speaker 3>you're a playoff team. Like that's what, these are the

0:30:32.230 --> 0:30:33.610
<v Speaker 3>type of games that they set up the rest of

0:30:33.650 --> 0:30:36.229
<v Speaker 3>your season. And they had people like me adjust our

0:30:36.310 --> 0:30:39.330
<v Speaker 3>models to it. Cause it's like, okay, this is, this

0:30:39.370 --> 0:30:42.290
<v Speaker 3>team is for real. Cause right now there are seven

0:30:42.330 --> 0:30:44.630
<v Speaker 3>seed missed playoffs type of field, the Browns. Like it's,

0:30:44.930 --> 0:30:46.230
<v Speaker 3>can they backdoor their way into it?

0:30:46.350 --> 0:30:46.590
<v Speaker 2>Sure.

0:30:47.210 --> 0:30:49.410
<v Speaker 3>But they win this type of game. I'm telling you,

0:30:49.430 --> 0:30:52.200
<v Speaker 3>it sets up for your whole season. Cause it's, you're,

0:30:52.320 --> 0:30:54.980
<v Speaker 3>you're breaking the pattern. Like these are really, really hard

0:30:55.020 --> 0:30:57.180
<v Speaker 3>games to win unless you're a really legit team. So,

0:30:58.470 --> 0:30:59.950
<v Speaker 3>So that was our whole point about the Jets. It's

0:30:59.970 --> 0:31:02.550
<v Speaker 3>just we saw this number Sunday. The public is going

0:31:02.570 --> 0:31:04.990
<v Speaker 3>to walk right into it, bet a bad number, bet

0:31:05.030 --> 0:31:07.870
<v Speaker 3>the Browns, and get the Jets, you know, Jets win

0:31:07.890 --> 0:31:10.170
<v Speaker 3>by three, whatever it's going to be. It's just this

0:31:10.230 --> 0:31:12.210
<v Speaker 3>is what the sportsbooks do. So that's just why we

0:31:12.790 --> 0:31:16.130
<v Speaker 3>either avoid it or take the Jets. That's our play

0:31:16.150 --> 0:31:16.610
<v Speaker 3>for this one.

0:31:17.250 --> 0:31:20.730
<v Speaker 1>Look, despite all the attention and the public backing for

0:31:20.750 --> 0:31:24.850
<v Speaker 1>the Browns on the road, the number has moved. Yeah.

0:31:25.840 --> 0:31:29.480
<v Speaker 1>That is an indicator that there is someone who isn't

0:31:29.540 --> 0:31:32.760
<v Speaker 1>just the public that is interested in the Browns. So

0:31:32.780 --> 0:31:37.290
<v Speaker 1>that's a little bit also, I think, of our hesitation.

0:31:37.310 --> 0:31:42.430
<v Speaker 1>Let me rephrase. Either the books are getting so much

0:31:42.490 --> 0:31:45.130
<v Speaker 1>activity from just the public that they were forced to

0:31:45.170 --> 0:31:48.430
<v Speaker 1>do it, or somebody of knowledge came in and moved

0:31:48.470 --> 0:31:50.870
<v Speaker 1>it in the Browns' direction. But at some point, it

0:31:50.890 --> 0:31:53.980
<v Speaker 1>just becomes a jet's line. And you got to play

0:31:54.010 --> 0:31:56.970
<v Speaker 1>the Jets, especially in this kind of situation. So we'll

0:31:56.990 --> 0:31:59.670
<v Speaker 1>keep an eye on that one. We're going over a

0:31:59.690 --> 0:32:01.870
<v Speaker 1>lot of games today because I don't feel like we,

0:32:02.190 --> 0:32:06.650
<v Speaker 1>there's so much movement and so much changing opinion. Indy

0:32:06.690 --> 0:32:10.450
<v Speaker 1>at Pittsburgh, you lean pit on Tuesday, sharp money coming

0:32:10.530 --> 0:32:13.390
<v Speaker 1>in on the Steelers for sure. The line is still

0:32:13.430 --> 0:32:14.910
<v Speaker 1>at two and a half. It looks like it's headed

0:32:14.950 --> 0:32:17.410
<v Speaker 1>to three. We didn't spend a ton of time on this,

0:32:17.490 --> 0:32:19.210
<v Speaker 1>but sometimes we don't do that. And we sort of

0:32:19.270 --> 0:32:24.320
<v Speaker 1>lose track of games that might be obvious and, Pittsburgh

0:32:24.360 --> 0:32:26.470
<v Speaker 1>may end up being an obvious submission for us. A

0:32:26.510 --> 0:32:30.810
<v Speaker 1>good number, home team, offense improving. I went back and researched.

0:32:30.830 --> 0:32:34.150
<v Speaker 1>You're right. The Colts have some real serious injury issues,

0:32:34.190 --> 0:32:38.060
<v Speaker 1>especially in the receiver spot. Has anything changed? Has this

0:32:38.140 --> 0:32:41.440
<v Speaker 1>moved into a more dominant, most bet position for you?

0:32:43.200 --> 0:32:44.880
<v Speaker 3>No, but it feels like it's no different than Houston

0:32:44.900 --> 0:32:48.180
<v Speaker 3>last week where– I just want to get the best

0:32:48.240 --> 0:32:50.830
<v Speaker 3>number because I could see what happened with Houston last

0:32:50.850 --> 0:32:53.070
<v Speaker 3>week happened with the same thing with Steelers this week,

0:32:53.090 --> 0:32:54.570
<v Speaker 3>where this goes to three or three and a half.

0:32:54.850 --> 0:32:56.870
<v Speaker 2>So that's really what it's all about.

0:32:56.890 --> 0:32:58.770
<v Speaker 3>It's just really about playing the number and the value here,

0:32:58.830 --> 0:33:01.090
<v Speaker 3>where if it's three and a half and you want

0:33:01.110 --> 0:33:02.790
<v Speaker 3>to play the Colts, I got no issue with that.

0:33:02.930 --> 0:33:06.120
<v Speaker 3>Like the Steelers, they're not three and a half points

0:33:06.160 --> 0:33:07.820
<v Speaker 3>better than the Colts, but I think they are three

0:33:07.880 --> 0:33:09.360
<v Speaker 3>points and two and a half points better. Like, I

0:33:09.380 --> 0:33:11.800
<v Speaker 3>think this is the exact, the exact type of game

0:33:11.820 --> 0:33:14.920
<v Speaker 3>with Steelers win by a field goal. They're just, Overall,

0:33:14.960 --> 0:33:17.900
<v Speaker 3>it's a better position, and the Steelers' biggest weakness, which

0:33:18.020 --> 0:33:19.860
<v Speaker 3>the Colts could use to their advantage, is running the

0:33:19.900 --> 0:33:22.230
<v Speaker 3>ball with Taylor. That is something they struggle with, but

0:33:23.930 --> 0:33:27.810
<v Speaker 3>we've seen this. The Steelers' defense, some weeks when they

0:33:27.850 --> 0:33:30.490
<v Speaker 3>bring it, man, they're just so dominant. They have so

0:33:30.530 --> 0:33:35.230
<v Speaker 3>much talent. The only time we've really seen them struggle,

0:33:35.890 --> 0:33:37.760
<v Speaker 3>I guess you could say they just struggle against Deshaun

0:33:37.780 --> 0:33:39.380
<v Speaker 3>Watts and the Browns. The Browns put up a ton

0:33:39.440 --> 0:33:42.340
<v Speaker 3>of points, but Even that Joe Burrow game, they just–

0:33:42.360 --> 0:33:45.140
<v Speaker 3>they never died, right? They stayed after and they got

0:33:45.180 --> 0:33:46.920
<v Speaker 3>that sack at the end of it, the strip sack

0:33:46.940 --> 0:33:50.580
<v Speaker 3>at the ball. So, yeah, it's another tricky line here

0:33:50.600 --> 0:33:53.180
<v Speaker 3>where I just– I'm more comfortable betting the Steelers, but

0:33:53.200 --> 0:33:55.740
<v Speaker 3>it's all about the numbers. So, yeah, Sunday morning chat,

0:33:55.760 --> 0:33:56.920
<v Speaker 3>if we come in and it's two and a half

0:33:56.940 --> 0:33:59.080
<v Speaker 3>and we still– I'm still betting to it. You feel

0:33:59.100 --> 0:34:01.140
<v Speaker 3>better about it. I got no issue putting the Steelers in,

0:34:01.900 --> 0:34:02.770
<v Speaker 3>especially at this number.

0:34:04.870 --> 0:34:08.190
<v Speaker 1>Las Vegas at New England. New England is a three

0:34:08.230 --> 0:34:11.759
<v Speaker 1>and a half point favorite right now. If you had

0:34:11.820 --> 0:34:15.319
<v Speaker 1>told me before the season began that we go into

0:34:15.469 --> 0:34:20.509
<v Speaker 1>week five and the momentum machine is for a Las

0:34:20.530 --> 0:34:25.150
<v Speaker 1>Vegas team coming off a loss against the Chiefs instead

0:34:25.190 --> 0:34:27.590
<v Speaker 1>of a New England team that came off a win

0:34:27.810 --> 0:34:31.109
<v Speaker 1>on the road at Buffalo, I would have told you

0:34:31.140 --> 0:34:36.960
<v Speaker 1>you're cray-cray. But that's how cray-cray the NFL is right now.

0:34:37.980 --> 0:34:43.160
<v Speaker 1>The Raiders are a... along with the Jets and along

0:34:43.180 --> 0:34:47.580
<v Speaker 1>with the Giants and along with the Browns, these three teams, massive,

0:34:47.980 --> 0:34:51.640
<v Speaker 1>massive public dogs. What are we talking about here? The Raiders,

0:34:51.780 --> 0:34:55.980
<v Speaker 1>the Browns, the Giants, these are the massive public dogs

0:34:56.380 --> 0:35:02.200
<v Speaker 1>on the road against the Patriots? This is insane to me.

0:35:02.940 --> 0:35:06.239
<v Speaker 1>And I know we wanted to lean Raiders the other day,

0:35:06.790 --> 0:35:09.089
<v Speaker 1>But the fact they're getting so much public backing, to me,

0:35:09.130 --> 0:35:11.190
<v Speaker 1>makes me feel like the secret might be out and

0:35:11.230 --> 0:35:13.029
<v Speaker 1>we've got to be on the Patriots here.

0:35:14.850 --> 0:35:17.169
<v Speaker 3>It could be, but it is book to book, shop

0:35:17.210 --> 0:35:19.160
<v Speaker 3>to shop right now with this line. I know plenty

0:35:19.180 --> 0:35:21.719
<v Speaker 3>of shops that are getting tons of Patriots money because

0:35:21.760 --> 0:35:23.340
<v Speaker 3>they did just have such.

0:35:23.180 --> 0:35:25.879
<v Speaker 2>A huge win, right? They did just beat Buffalo. People

0:35:25.920 --> 0:35:27.440
<v Speaker 2>are back on. They're back to believing.

0:35:28.239 --> 0:35:29.880
<v Speaker 3>Of all the games you talked about, though, this is

0:35:29.900 --> 0:35:32.380
<v Speaker 3>the only one that still feels like it's a mispriced round.

0:35:33.020 --> 0:35:34.460
<v Speaker 3>I do have questions about the Browns. I have questions

0:35:34.480 --> 0:35:36.910
<v Speaker 3>about the Giants. I feel like I know exactly who

0:35:36.930 --> 0:35:39.870
<v Speaker 3>the Raiders are. And to me, this is another game

0:35:39.890 --> 0:35:42.129
<v Speaker 3>where it feels like this lands on three. Like, yeah,

0:35:42.170 --> 0:35:44.540
<v Speaker 3>could the Patriots blow them out and roll them? The

0:35:44.580 --> 0:35:49.239
<v Speaker 3>Raiders finally play a terrible game and Kirk Cousins goes

0:35:49.300 --> 0:35:51.360
<v Speaker 3>back to being a pumpkin. All those things are on

0:35:51.380 --> 0:35:53.940
<v Speaker 3>the table. I just feel like they're so well coached.

0:35:54.000 --> 0:35:56.450
<v Speaker 3>They have so much talent. I mean, they could have

0:35:56.469 --> 0:35:58.790
<v Speaker 3>stole that game easily against the Chiefs. They easily could

0:35:58.810 --> 0:36:01.890
<v Speaker 3>have won the game without that fumble. And what's this

0:36:01.950 --> 0:36:02.390
<v Speaker 3>number then?

0:36:02.550 --> 0:36:02.810
<v Speaker 2>Is this.

0:36:03.650 --> 0:36:05.950
<v Speaker 3>two and a half or is it still this number

0:36:06.010 --> 0:36:09.250
<v Speaker 3>right now which would be a glaring like you're saying

0:36:09.330 --> 0:36:11.230
<v Speaker 3>a glaring trap we got to just walk away for

0:36:11.270 --> 0:36:13.509
<v Speaker 3>this one but i'm still a believer i still think

0:36:13.530 --> 0:36:15.180
<v Speaker 3>the books are still too low on this raiders team

0:36:15.410 --> 0:36:18.120
<v Speaker 3>and we've seen that every week so far this season

0:36:18.160 --> 0:36:19.759
<v Speaker 3>it's not like they're just been covering by half a

0:36:19.800 --> 0:36:21.219
<v Speaker 3>point i mean last week they covered by a point

0:36:21.239 --> 0:36:24.400
<v Speaker 3>and a half so um maybe maybe we're walking right

0:36:24.420 --> 0:36:26.080
<v Speaker 3>into it but it's another game where i haven't moved

0:36:26.160 --> 0:36:29.129
<v Speaker 3>off i've took a position on the raiders I still

0:36:29.150 --> 0:36:30.690
<v Speaker 3>think it's a good number. And I just still think

0:36:30.710 --> 0:36:32.509
<v Speaker 3>it's about all the injuries to the Patriots. Like, yes,

0:36:32.570 --> 0:36:34.810
<v Speaker 3>they got away with one last week, but we talked,

0:36:34.830 --> 0:36:37.440
<v Speaker 3>but you could go back and watch that. Drake may

0:36:37.460 --> 0:36:39.820
<v Speaker 3>just was out of body experience. Third and 10 back

0:36:39.920 --> 0:36:42.020
<v Speaker 3>foot throw 20 yards downfield.

0:36:42.040 --> 0:36:44.600
<v Speaker 2>The guy, it was just out of this world.

0:36:44.620 --> 0:36:45.940
<v Speaker 3>And when they needed to touch on the red zone,

0:36:45.980 --> 0:36:47.940
<v Speaker 3>third and 10 corner of the end zone.

0:36:47.989 --> 0:36:48.610
<v Speaker 2>Perfect throw.

0:36:48.640 --> 0:36:51.850
<v Speaker 3>Like it, that really was all about Drake. So could

0:36:51.870 --> 0:36:53.830
<v Speaker 3>we get, could Drake have found it? Could he found

0:36:53.870 --> 0:36:55.430
<v Speaker 3>his groove and we get burned again here?

0:36:55.730 --> 0:36:56.150
<v Speaker 2>Of course.

0:36:56.250 --> 0:36:59.640
<v Speaker 3>But I just, I can't get over this number, man.

0:36:59.660 --> 0:37:01.560
<v Speaker 3>It's just three and a half. This Raiders team, I think,

0:37:01.600 --> 0:37:05.200
<v Speaker 3>is just still underrated by the shop. So they got me.

0:37:05.280 --> 0:37:06.640
<v Speaker 3>They're sucking me in with this number, Chad. I'm not

0:37:06.660 --> 0:37:08.660
<v Speaker 3>going to lie to you. It's just, if this was three,

0:37:08.739 --> 0:37:10.180
<v Speaker 3>maybe two and a half, I could have talked my

0:37:10.219 --> 0:37:12.170
<v Speaker 3>way out of this one. But with the hook, I

0:37:12.210 --> 0:37:13.670
<v Speaker 3>just think this Raiders team is too good to be

0:37:13.690 --> 0:37:14.790
<v Speaker 3>still getting that type of number.

0:37:15.410 --> 0:37:17.750
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's moving. Like, it's all juiced to

0:37:17.790 --> 0:37:19.730
<v Speaker 1>stay exactly where it is. It's one of the few

0:37:19.790 --> 0:37:20.549
<v Speaker 1>lines this week.

0:37:20.590 --> 0:37:22.569
<v Speaker 2>Some books have touched four. Like, that's what you're saying.

0:37:22.590 --> 0:37:25.200
<v Speaker 3>Like, there are really smart pro money on this Patriots team, so.

0:37:25.670 --> 0:37:27.649
<v Speaker 3>That's just another game why we're hesitant on this one.

0:37:27.690 --> 0:37:30.069
<v Speaker 3>So I'm interested in what we do Sunday morning because

0:37:30.090 --> 0:37:32.140
<v Speaker 3>I'm just so tempted right now with this Raiders team.

0:37:32.800 --> 0:37:34.560
<v Speaker 1>Listen, we got to talk about the Bears and the

0:37:34.600 --> 0:37:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Packers because Chicago is visiting Green Bay. The line has

0:37:38.140 --> 0:37:42.680
<v Speaker 1>come down ever so slightly. I can't remember if it

0:37:42.719 --> 0:37:45.239
<v Speaker 1>touched three, but certainly for most of the week it

0:37:45.280 --> 0:37:48.460
<v Speaker 1>was two and a half. It's down to one and

0:37:48.500 --> 0:37:53.480
<v Speaker 1>a half, which feels more appropriate to me. I think

0:37:53.520 --> 0:37:56.210
<v Speaker 1>there was so much enthusiasm for the Bears. and so

0:37:56.230 --> 0:37:59.529
<v Speaker 1>much anti-Packer sentiment coming out of last week that the

0:37:59.570 --> 0:38:02.560
<v Speaker 1>line got a little bit inflated. The bookmakers set it

0:38:02.580 --> 0:38:04.540
<v Speaker 1>a little bit higher because the perception of the Bears

0:38:04.600 --> 0:38:07.060
<v Speaker 1>is so good. And there's all this talk about Ben

0:38:07.080 --> 0:38:08.779
<v Speaker 1>Johnson as coach of the year, and they held the

0:38:08.800 --> 0:38:13.570
<v Speaker 1>ball for 42 minutes. But we're still talking about a

0:38:15.810 --> 0:38:20.530
<v Speaker 1>second string quarterback going on the road into Green Bay

0:38:20.770 --> 0:38:24.980
<v Speaker 1>in a huge rivalry game. still with a very good

0:38:25.020 --> 0:38:28.990
<v Speaker 1>quarterback in Jordan Love. And while the Bears defense, according

0:38:29.030 --> 0:38:33.250
<v Speaker 1>to metrics, has actually been playing really, really well, I

0:38:33.290 --> 0:38:37.430
<v Speaker 1>think they're benefiting from a Jets team that couldn't score,

0:38:37.850 --> 0:38:42.750
<v Speaker 1>a Vikings team in really, really bad weather. There is

0:38:42.810 --> 0:38:45.790
<v Speaker 1>some flukiness, there's some noise in sort of the stats

0:38:45.830 --> 0:38:48.050
<v Speaker 1>that are helping their defense look as good as it

0:38:48.090 --> 0:38:53.020
<v Speaker 1>does right now. But Bears at minus one and a

0:38:53.080 --> 0:38:57.339
<v Speaker 1>half all of a sudden, I need to take my

0:38:57.390 --> 0:38:59.930
<v Speaker 1>sentiment out of it because that's starting to look like

0:39:00.030 --> 0:39:03.509
<v Speaker 1>a Ben Johnson line to me.

0:39:05.210 --> 0:39:07.110
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's fair to say they've played one real offense

0:39:07.130 --> 0:39:10.090
<v Speaker 3>this season in Chicago, and that was the Panthers. I

0:39:10.110 --> 0:39:12.750
<v Speaker 3>don't think Green Bay is a real offense. I don't

0:39:13.070 --> 0:39:15.770
<v Speaker 3>know how it benefits them. We know the Bears' defense

0:39:15.790 --> 0:39:17.430
<v Speaker 3>isn't good, and they're going to live and die off turnovers.

0:39:18.400 --> 0:39:20.540
<v Speaker 3>It's been working this year. They're getting their turnovers. They're

0:39:20.560 --> 0:39:26.590
<v Speaker 3>winning all these games they should win. This line just stinks, Chad.

0:39:26.770 --> 0:39:27.880
<v Speaker 3>When it was three.

0:39:30.219 --> 0:39:32.960
<v Speaker 2>you were right. It's like, okay, now I can be

0:39:32.980 --> 0:39:35.109
<v Speaker 2>talking to Green Bay. But you're right.

0:39:35.140 --> 0:39:37.729
<v Speaker 3>At one and a half, who is betting Green Bay?

0:39:38.410 --> 0:39:43.050
<v Speaker 3>So the books, people, they're taking a very large financial

0:39:43.110 --> 0:39:47.810
<v Speaker 3>stand on this Packers team. And We've seen it. Football

0:39:47.850 --> 0:39:49.950
<v Speaker 3>is just wonky. They play this game nine out of

0:39:49.950 --> 0:39:53.319
<v Speaker 3>10 times. I think the Bears just absolutely steamrolled. The

0:39:53.360 --> 0:39:55.160
<v Speaker 3>books are truly saying this is one of the 10

0:39:55.160 --> 0:39:57.620
<v Speaker 3>and they are taking a very large position.

0:39:57.640 --> 0:40:01.589
<v Speaker 2>I talked to five bookmakers.

0:40:02.170 --> 0:40:04.670
<v Speaker 3>None of them are below 70% of the money or

0:40:04.730 --> 0:40:07.410
<v Speaker 3>bets on the Bears.

0:40:08.110 --> 0:40:10.529
<v Speaker 2>All five books are above 70% money and bets and

0:40:12.280 --> 0:40:13.180
<v Speaker 2>those bets do win.

0:40:13.280 --> 0:40:16.460
<v Speaker 3>I mean, LA Rams, every shop, same, all these same shops,

0:40:16.620 --> 0:40:18.600
<v Speaker 3>LA Rams, 80% of the bets on the money last week.

0:40:19.040 --> 0:40:21.739
<v Speaker 2>And it all came through. Now we all agree.

0:40:21.780 --> 0:40:24.239
<v Speaker 3>That was one of the luckiest backdoor insane covers ever.

0:40:24.280 --> 0:40:26.299
<v Speaker 3>And the Eagles had to go make history and go

0:40:26.380 --> 0:40:29.520
<v Speaker 3>over 12 on third down. No model can account for that.

0:40:29.540 --> 0:40:32.140
<v Speaker 3>So the books stay their course. It's like, okay, that

0:40:32.160 --> 0:40:35.100
<v Speaker 3>wasn't a bad read by us. It just, that's football.

0:40:35.140 --> 0:40:38.420
<v Speaker 3>That's sports. Stupid luck is going to happen. You're going

0:40:38.440 --> 0:40:40.160
<v Speaker 3>to need stupid luck once again, for this Bears team.

0:40:40.180 --> 0:40:42.810
<v Speaker 3>That's what they're saying here. So, I love this movement

0:40:42.830 --> 0:40:45.710
<v Speaker 3>because now if I if I'm on the Bears, I'm

0:40:45.750 --> 0:40:47.190
<v Speaker 3>just going to take the minus nine and a half.

0:40:47.270 --> 0:40:49.650
<v Speaker 2>I'll take the adjusted line because that's what it's going

0:40:49.670 --> 0:40:49.810
<v Speaker 2>to be.

0:40:49.969 --> 0:40:51.610
<v Speaker 3>Bears either are going to blow this team out, this

0:40:51.670 --> 0:40:54.250
<v Speaker 3>Packers team, or the Packers are going to somehow win

0:40:54.270 --> 0:40:56.130
<v Speaker 3>this game very close. That's really what the books are

0:40:56.170 --> 0:40:57.910
<v Speaker 3>telling you here with this line, in my opinion. So

0:40:59.230 --> 0:41:02.310
<v Speaker 3>I'm shocked by this movement. I just I keep thinking

0:41:02.350 --> 0:41:06.770
<v Speaker 3>I'm I'm too too low on this Green Bay team.

0:41:07.820 --> 0:41:11.339
<v Speaker 3>And that might be true. Because, like, the books are

0:41:11.380 --> 0:41:13.060
<v Speaker 3>telling me right now, they're like, this Packers team is

0:41:13.100 --> 0:41:15.430
<v Speaker 3>not as bad as you and I perceive them.

0:41:16.810 --> 0:41:19.089
<v Speaker 2>Like, I can't even remember last week watching them against

0:41:19.110 --> 0:41:19.489
<v Speaker 2>the Bucs.

0:41:19.770 --> 0:41:22.330
<v Speaker 3>I don't know. I don't get what they're backing. Like,

0:41:22.370 --> 0:41:25.089
<v Speaker 3>Van Ness has looked great on the Green Bay front line. And, yeah,

0:41:25.110 --> 0:41:27.069
<v Speaker 3>they have good safeties, but their corners are terrible. Their

0:41:27.090 --> 0:41:30.580
<v Speaker 3>linebackers aren't consistent. They just don't– I don't get where

0:41:30.600 --> 0:41:31.320
<v Speaker 3>they're looking defensively.

0:41:31.340 --> 0:41:31.779
<v Speaker 2>And we've talked.

0:41:31.800 --> 0:41:34.299
<v Speaker 3>Their offensive line is in total shambles. As bad as

0:41:34.780 --> 0:41:37.400
<v Speaker 3>the Bears team is, they have an okay front. Like,

0:41:37.440 --> 0:41:41.820
<v Speaker 3>they can get after the passer. The QB, I should say. So, yeah,

0:41:42.080 --> 0:41:44.259
<v Speaker 3>it's just a game where I was very confident. I

0:41:44.300 --> 0:41:46.819
<v Speaker 3>was happy to take a position on the Bears. Now

0:41:46.900 --> 0:41:49.919
<v Speaker 3>I've got to be smarter. I've got to either just

0:41:50.000 --> 0:41:52.779
<v Speaker 3>avoid it, take an adjusted line, or suck it up

0:41:52.840 --> 0:41:53.760
<v Speaker 3>and just take the Packers.

0:41:53.780 --> 0:41:55.390
<v Speaker 2>But I really don't want to. I just do not

0:41:55.469 --> 0:41:56.489
<v Speaker 2>see it with this Packers team.

0:41:57.090 --> 0:42:00.290
<v Speaker 1>Look, they've also lost Edrin Cooper, their linebacker, right, for

0:42:00.310 --> 0:42:04.310
<v Speaker 1>the season. You mentioned the offensive line. They're basically rotating

0:42:04.370 --> 0:42:07.350
<v Speaker 1>guys in off the street. They cannot find guys to

0:42:07.390 --> 0:42:13.280
<v Speaker 1>fill that. offensive line it's tricky man it's the like

0:42:14.120 --> 0:42:15.540
<v Speaker 1>they are trying to.

0:42:15.320 --> 0:42:17.080
<v Speaker 2>Scare us off they're trying to scare us off i

0:42:17.140 --> 0:42:17.700
<v Speaker 2>think i.

0:42:17.820 --> 0:42:19.759
<v Speaker 1>Think they are i don't get it i don't get

0:42:19.800 --> 0:42:20.300
<v Speaker 1>it either.

0:42:20.100 --> 0:42:22.799
<v Speaker 3>Feels like we're saying though if they kept us at

0:42:22.820 --> 0:42:25.910
<v Speaker 3>three people they would have got they would still would

0:42:25.930 --> 0:42:28.830
<v Speaker 3>have got a ton of money on the bears like

0:42:28.850 --> 0:42:31.030
<v Speaker 3>the fact that they moved it here they're they're literally

0:42:31.450 --> 0:42:34.109
<v Speaker 3>they want more bears money that's what's so terrifying that's

0:42:34.130 --> 0:42:37.489
<v Speaker 3>what doesn't make sense so We've just been in this.

0:42:37.550 --> 0:42:39.330
<v Speaker 3>We've both done this for so long. Like, yeah, you

0:42:39.350 --> 0:42:42.130
<v Speaker 3>can get away with this. People, public do win. But

0:42:42.150 --> 0:42:44.200
<v Speaker 3>this is a long-term loser. If you're betting the Bears team,

0:42:44.400 --> 0:42:46.080
<v Speaker 3>this is a long-term loser, technically.

0:42:47.400 --> 0:42:50.200
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco at Seattle. Seattle is now up to three.

0:42:50.260 --> 0:42:53.180
<v Speaker 1>This was Chad's choice at two and a half. Solid

0:42:53.200 --> 0:42:55.740
<v Speaker 1>three across the board. We both liked it on Sunday night.

0:42:56.280 --> 0:42:58.850
<v Speaker 1>We're getting a little feedback from our friends, the professionals,

0:42:59.230 --> 0:43:02.370
<v Speaker 1>in sharp calls saying they really like San Francisco. I

0:43:02.410 --> 0:43:05.860
<v Speaker 1>really like San Francisco, too. I actually don't think Seattle

0:43:06.000 --> 0:43:09.219
<v Speaker 1>is overvalued off of the Super Bowl win. I think

0:43:09.280 --> 0:43:12.140
<v Speaker 1>if anything, Seattle was one of the least talked about

0:43:12.500 --> 0:43:17.650
<v Speaker 1>defending Super Bowl champions because everybody was talking about the Rams.

0:43:17.710 --> 0:43:19.969
<v Speaker 1>People were talking about Patrick Mahomes coming back. There was

0:43:20.050 --> 0:43:22.750
<v Speaker 1>not a lot of talk about Seattle, but I think

0:43:22.770 --> 0:43:27.830
<v Speaker 1>they've been so good and dominant on defense. That's why

0:43:27.910 --> 0:43:31.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm doing it. We see Mike Evans with a broken rib.

0:43:32.370 --> 0:43:34.589
<v Speaker 1>We see Kyle Juszczyk not going to be playing. And

0:43:34.830 --> 0:43:37.670
<v Speaker 1>I just believe he's so important to a lot of

0:43:37.710 --> 0:43:41.070
<v Speaker 1>the game planning in that offense. It's why they continue

0:43:41.090 --> 0:43:45.000
<v Speaker 1>to keep the guy around. And this defensive line is

0:43:45.060 --> 0:43:47.580
<v Speaker 1>really struggling. So even if you're going against an offense

0:43:47.660 --> 0:43:53.140
<v Speaker 1>in Sam Darnold that continues to be inconsistent and they're

0:43:53.900 --> 0:43:55.879
<v Speaker 1>trying to get Joe Mixon off the street and can't

0:43:55.920 --> 0:43:58.080
<v Speaker 1>even get him to join the roster because he's not

0:43:58.120 --> 0:44:03.719
<v Speaker 1>passing a physical or not physically able, like, That, to me,

0:44:03.800 --> 0:44:05.799
<v Speaker 1>it's really about what this defense is going to do

0:44:06.000 --> 0:44:08.620
<v Speaker 1>at home coming off of a game in which they

0:44:08.660 --> 0:44:11.819
<v Speaker 1>gave up a lot of cheap plays and let the

0:44:11.880 --> 0:44:17.930
<v Speaker 1>Chargers sneak back in. They were very undisciplined. This feels

0:44:17.969 --> 0:44:20.870
<v Speaker 1>like too much belief in Kyle Shanahan magic and not

0:44:20.910 --> 0:44:23.370
<v Speaker 1>enough belief in the spot for the Seahawks in their defense.

0:44:25.140 --> 0:44:25.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's a little of that.

0:44:25.980 --> 0:44:27.580
<v Speaker 3>The argument I got a lot from the guys was

0:44:27.620 --> 0:44:30.060
<v Speaker 3>just the fact that, like Paulie Marker, you can get

0:44:30.080 --> 0:44:31.200
<v Speaker 3>Niners three and a half right now.

0:44:31.719 --> 0:44:32.350
<v Speaker 1>That's part of it.

0:44:33.030 --> 0:44:35.230
<v Speaker 2>That is obviously part of it. The big one will

0:44:35.250 --> 0:44:39.390
<v Speaker 2>just be through four weeks, who has played better and

0:44:39.410 --> 0:44:43.250
<v Speaker 2>more consistent? The Niners. Who has been up and down,

0:44:43.489 --> 0:44:45.430
<v Speaker 2>a little shaky to start the year? It's fair.

0:44:45.450 --> 0:44:48.550
<v Speaker 3>It's the Seahawks, right? I mean, that Mariota game is

0:44:48.570 --> 0:44:50.210
<v Speaker 3>going to jump out to a lot of people. You

0:44:50.230 --> 0:44:52.130
<v Speaker 3>didn't see their defense get up to those type of

0:44:52.150 --> 0:44:54.870
<v Speaker 3>big passing plays. Now, you talk all the time. These

0:44:54.910 --> 0:44:57.330
<v Speaker 3>backup quarterbacks that come in, they can all have that

0:44:57.450 --> 0:45:00.910
<v Speaker 3>one fluky game. These– These are some of the best athletes, right,

0:45:00.950 --> 0:45:04.270
<v Speaker 3>playing football at the highest level. These guys, for one game,

0:45:04.290 --> 0:45:06.950
<v Speaker 3>your body's fully healthy. Yeah, you can have an incredible

0:45:07.110 --> 0:45:10.850
<v Speaker 3>one game. But like you said, the Chargers also, you know,

0:45:11.010 --> 0:45:13.180
<v Speaker 3>it's horrible. You look at the underlying numbers. Chargers are

0:45:13.219 --> 0:45:13.820
<v Speaker 3>totally lost.

0:45:13.880 --> 0:45:14.280
<v Speaker 2>Horrible.

0:45:14.820 --> 0:45:16.660
<v Speaker 3>They were able to put up 23 points. Now, like

0:45:16.680 --> 0:45:18.980
<v Speaker 3>Chad said, that's a ton of junk time. A lot

0:45:19.020 --> 0:45:20.779
<v Speaker 3>of Seattle let those guys back in. They were up

0:45:20.820 --> 0:45:23.780
<v Speaker 3>so big, you know, they let that team back door.

0:45:23.860 --> 0:45:25.980
<v Speaker 3>So I think we're both the same where it's like

0:45:26.020 --> 0:45:28.380
<v Speaker 3>we still believe in Seattle at home when it was

0:45:28.420 --> 0:45:30.640
<v Speaker 3>two and a half. That was just a great number

0:45:30.660 --> 0:45:33.319
<v Speaker 3>of great values. So I hope it goes back down.

0:45:33.580 --> 0:45:35.620
<v Speaker 3>Like I said, there is professional money on the 49ers.

0:45:35.660 --> 0:45:38.600
<v Speaker 3>They're just a lot of models have them graded as

0:45:38.660 --> 0:45:41.819
<v Speaker 3>just as a three point dog here. So people are

0:45:41.840 --> 0:45:43.460
<v Speaker 3>just going to take that half point of value. They're

0:45:43.480 --> 0:45:44.660
<v Speaker 3>going to take that three and a half, especially if

0:45:44.680 --> 0:45:47.560
<v Speaker 3>Polly Mark has given it to you. So another line

0:45:47.580 --> 0:45:48.939
<v Speaker 3>that's going to be fun to follow this week. We'll

0:45:48.980 --> 0:45:51.239
<v Speaker 3>see pros come back and bet it down. We can

0:45:51.280 --> 0:45:54.190
<v Speaker 3>get it to an after a contest. That's a real conversation.

0:45:54.270 --> 0:45:56.489
<v Speaker 3>Like we're getting a great team at home under a

0:45:56.570 --> 0:46:00.410
<v Speaker 3>field goal in a divisional game. where, you know, our

0:46:00.510 --> 0:46:02.430
<v Speaker 3>only hesitation, I don't know about you, but my only

0:46:02.510 --> 0:46:05.100
<v Speaker 3>real hesitation right now with Seattle is Sam Darnold.

0:46:05.300 --> 0:46:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, totally.

0:46:06.580 --> 0:46:08.460
<v Speaker 3>He just does not look comfortable. He's played three games

0:46:08.500 --> 0:46:10.200
<v Speaker 3>this year, right? And I know he got knocked out

0:46:10.219 --> 0:46:13.540
<v Speaker 3>that first game. Can't take anything away from it. These

0:46:13.580 --> 0:46:15.549
<v Speaker 3>two weeks, he's trying to play him back self into

0:46:15.630 --> 0:46:18.230
<v Speaker 3>rhythm and shape and like that, okay. But we need

0:46:18.250 --> 0:46:20.810
<v Speaker 3>to see it at some point. And that's what's so

0:46:20.830 --> 0:46:23.610
<v Speaker 3>unnerving here. We just have not seen it where it

0:46:23.630 --> 0:46:25.989
<v Speaker 3>just feels like JSN just keeps bailing him out. which

0:46:26.090 --> 0:46:27.650
<v Speaker 3>that's a great way to live. He's like the best

0:46:27.690 --> 0:46:30.029
<v Speaker 3>receiver in football. You can get away with that. But

0:46:30.230 --> 0:46:32.549
<v Speaker 3>it's just a little nerve-wracking when this matchup he's playing

0:46:32.570 --> 0:46:37.149
<v Speaker 3>against right now viewed as a league MVP in Brock Purdy. So, yeah,

0:46:37.170 --> 0:46:40.509
<v Speaker 3>we could have easily made those hard brass balls back

0:46:40.590 --> 0:46:42.630
<v Speaker 3>because it does take a little balls here back in

0:46:42.650 --> 0:46:44.649
<v Speaker 3>the Seattle team. It doesn't necessarily feel like it, but

0:46:45.510 --> 0:46:48.160
<v Speaker 3>if you're betting them at three or three and a half,

0:46:48.610 --> 0:46:50.859
<v Speaker 3>I think that's the ballsier side where it just feels

0:46:50.880 --> 0:46:53.140
<v Speaker 3>like it's the easier side right now to take the

0:46:53.239 --> 0:46:54.400
<v Speaker 3>49ers at plus three.

0:46:54.239 --> 0:46:56.620
<v Speaker 1>And a half. Well, listen, it was Chad's choice of

0:46:56.640 --> 0:46:58.509
<v Speaker 1>two and a half. If you think it's ballsy to

0:46:58.550 --> 0:47:02.529
<v Speaker 1>take it at three, wait until you hear about the

0:47:02.590 --> 0:47:04.750
<v Speaker 1>Discord Grouper of the Week, because I think you're going

0:47:04.770 --> 0:47:10.770
<v Speaker 1>to enjoy that one, Simon. Detroit and Arizona. Arizona, it's

0:47:10.830 --> 0:47:12.600
<v Speaker 1>ticked up since we talked about it. It was at

0:47:12.640 --> 0:47:15.080
<v Speaker 1>four and a half. It was at six on Sunday.

0:47:15.860 --> 0:47:19.759
<v Speaker 1>And we kind of leaned Arizona in the moment. But

0:47:19.800 --> 0:47:21.520
<v Speaker 1>as we went through the week, and you talked about

0:47:21.540 --> 0:47:23.419
<v Speaker 1>this on Tuesday, you started to feel better and better

0:47:23.460 --> 0:47:27.319
<v Speaker 1>about Detroit. I think the wise guy money as much

0:47:27.360 --> 0:47:29.989
<v Speaker 1>as anything, it's why this number has moved up from

0:47:30.050 --> 0:47:31.550
<v Speaker 1>four and a half to five and a half Detroit

0:47:32.310 --> 0:47:35.669
<v Speaker 1>becoming bigger and bigger favorites on the road.

0:47:37.469 --> 0:47:37.649
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:47:37.670 --> 0:47:39.690
<v Speaker 3>Like we talked about that with Arizona, they're just a

0:47:39.710 --> 0:47:42.549
<v Speaker 3>bad team, right? We, we, we drank a little too

0:47:42.570 --> 0:47:44.380
<v Speaker 3>much of the Kool-Aid because of what they did in

0:47:45.200 --> 0:47:47.880
<v Speaker 3>week one against the chargers. And we've come around to

0:47:47.900 --> 0:47:49.759
<v Speaker 3>the fact that chargers are just a bad team. Like

0:47:49.820 --> 0:47:52.299
<v Speaker 3>it's just, they're not, they're not a good team. They're

0:47:52.320 --> 0:47:54.960
<v Speaker 3>not well coached right now. And Arizona is, Yeah, are

0:47:54.980 --> 0:47:56.960
<v Speaker 3>they better than what we thought they were coming into

0:47:56.980 --> 0:47:59.420
<v Speaker 3>the year? Yeah, people had them the same record as Miami.

0:47:59.540 --> 0:48:04.620
<v Speaker 3>They're clearly better than Miami. But Detroit, we've just seen

0:48:04.640 --> 0:48:07.680
<v Speaker 3>the history. Like, they lose bad. They get embarrassed. They

0:48:07.800 --> 0:48:11.140
<v Speaker 3>always bounce back. I mean, that could be a Campbell thing. And,

0:48:12.239 --> 0:48:14.900
<v Speaker 3>you know, the Ben Johnson stuff, you've seen it pop

0:48:15.000 --> 0:48:18.300
<v Speaker 3>up now. They're just– the imagination is just not there, right? Offensively,

0:48:18.800 --> 0:48:21.420
<v Speaker 3>it just isn't, right? It is a different team. But

0:48:21.460 --> 0:48:25.300
<v Speaker 3>they still have a top– two top one running back.

0:48:25.360 --> 0:48:27.610
<v Speaker 3>They still have Jared Goff. When he has time and

0:48:27.630 --> 0:48:30.890
<v Speaker 3>protection in the pocket, he's great. And they don't have

0:48:31.210 --> 0:48:33.129
<v Speaker 3>a type of defense that should give him fits here.

0:48:33.190 --> 0:48:35.770
<v Speaker 3>So this is another bet where you're just playing the number.

0:48:35.890 --> 0:48:37.410
<v Speaker 3>Like you're under six right now. I think that's a

0:48:37.430 --> 0:48:40.620
<v Speaker 3>great value on the Lions. Your true risk would be

0:48:40.680 --> 0:48:42.279
<v Speaker 3>the backdoor. That's what the Cardinals are going to live

0:48:42.300 --> 0:48:44.940
<v Speaker 3>and die with this season, the backdoor. So it's no

0:48:45.000 --> 0:48:47.080
<v Speaker 3>different here if you back the Lions when they played

0:48:47.100 --> 0:48:48.960
<v Speaker 3>the Jets or the Jets had opportunities that could have

0:48:48.980 --> 0:48:49.560
<v Speaker 3>backdoored them.

0:48:49.580 --> 0:48:50.020
<v Speaker 2>They didn't.

0:48:50.239 --> 0:48:52.379
<v Speaker 3>You got the win and the cover. So it feels

0:48:52.400 --> 0:48:54.520
<v Speaker 3>the same here. It's like Is it one of my

0:48:54.600 --> 0:48:56.580
<v Speaker 3>biggest bets this week? No, but it really is just

0:48:56.620 --> 0:48:58.339
<v Speaker 3>betting the number. It's under six. I think it's good

0:48:58.360 --> 0:49:00.069
<v Speaker 3>value on the Lions team. That is still much better

0:49:00.090 --> 0:49:01.050
<v Speaker 3>than this Cardinals team.

0:49:01.110 --> 0:49:03.170
<v Speaker 2>So I'll live and die with it. I could get

0:49:03.210 --> 0:49:04.050
<v Speaker 2>burned by the back.

0:49:03.870 --> 0:49:06.230
<v Speaker 3>Door, but this just feels like another coin flip game

0:49:06.250 --> 0:49:08.370
<v Speaker 3>where the better value on that coin flip right now

0:49:08.410 --> 0:49:09.050
<v Speaker 3>is on the Lions.

0:49:09.690 --> 0:49:11.270
<v Speaker 1>So the last game I want to talk about before

0:49:11.290 --> 0:49:14.669
<v Speaker 1>we get into the biggest bets and sharp versus square

0:49:14.690 --> 0:49:19.970
<v Speaker 1>and all this kind of stuff. Buffalo visiting the Rams. Rams?

0:49:20.050 --> 0:49:23.169
<v Speaker 1>are now on Monday night football. Rams are now three

0:49:23.230 --> 0:49:27.820
<v Speaker 1>point favorites. This was at two and a half earlier

0:49:27.880 --> 0:49:33.020
<v Speaker 1>in the week. It's hard to not want to bet

0:49:34.739 --> 0:49:38.850
<v Speaker 1>on Josh Allen as an underdog. coming off a game

0:49:38.890 --> 0:49:44.040
<v Speaker 1>in which they really should have dominated and still not

0:49:44.180 --> 0:49:48.800
<v Speaker 1>loving what we're seeing from Matthew Stafford and the Eagles.

0:49:49.600 --> 0:49:53.850
<v Speaker 1>They had a not-so-great second half against the Broncos, a

0:49:53.890 --> 0:49:58.590
<v Speaker 1>really good defense. They had a terrible 56 minutes against

0:49:58.650 --> 0:50:03.140
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles and squeaked one out. They go back home.

0:50:04.380 --> 0:50:12.870
<v Speaker 1>Pukunuku is back. They're on a fast surface. The Bills'

0:50:12.950 --> 0:50:17.410
<v Speaker 1>defense is struggling. But do we really want to go

0:50:17.450 --> 0:50:20.799
<v Speaker 1>against Josh Allen again as a three-point underdog?

0:50:22.680 --> 0:50:23.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's crazy.

0:50:23.420 --> 0:50:25.200
<v Speaker 3>Just the fact that I know of some really smart

0:50:25.239 --> 0:50:27.280
<v Speaker 3>pros who are taking a large position on the Rams.

0:50:27.700 --> 0:50:30.299
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so do I. I've seen it. I think that's

0:50:30.340 --> 0:50:32.060
<v Speaker 1>why the numbers moved as much as anything else.

0:50:33.020 --> 0:50:36.410
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. And again, I don't get it, though, because....

0:50:37.570 --> 0:50:40.279
<v Speaker 3>This just does, is there really value on the Rams here?

0:50:40.320 --> 0:50:42.880
<v Speaker 3>I must be missing something. Like maybe I am overrating

0:50:42.920 --> 0:50:45.560
<v Speaker 3>Josh Allen and maybe we are overrating the Spills team

0:50:45.580 --> 0:50:47.259
<v Speaker 3>and they're, they're not on the same levels as Rams

0:50:47.280 --> 0:50:50.200
<v Speaker 3>team because the Rams, I still think they're a team

0:50:50.219 --> 0:50:52.279
<v Speaker 3>that they're, they're missing such key guys. They have so

0:50:52.300 --> 0:50:55.320
<v Speaker 3>many injuries. They're not what they're going to be, especially

0:50:55.360 --> 0:50:58.180
<v Speaker 3>in November. Like this just, this feels like they're a

0:50:58.180 --> 0:51:02.509
<v Speaker 3>team that's still missing a ton of pieces and they've got,

0:51:02.550 --> 0:51:05.009
<v Speaker 3>if I mean, yeah, they, they beat the giants, but

0:51:05.050 --> 0:51:08.120
<v Speaker 3>like Chad said, those other three games, they haven't, they

0:51:08.140 --> 0:51:11.319
<v Speaker 3>have not looked like a dominant great Rams team in

0:51:11.360 --> 0:51:15.080
<v Speaker 3>any sense of the imagine. So should we just be patient?

0:51:15.100 --> 0:51:16.529
<v Speaker 3>I mean, probably markets give me three and a half

0:51:16.570 --> 0:51:18.509
<v Speaker 3>on the bills. I guess I'm a sucker. I guess

0:51:18.550 --> 0:51:22.190
<v Speaker 3>I'll have to take it. But I am like you,

0:51:22.230 --> 0:51:23.529
<v Speaker 3>I am shocked by the movement of this one. It's

0:51:23.550 --> 0:51:25.690
<v Speaker 3>just another game where I'm, I'm clearly missing something here.

0:51:25.750 --> 0:51:29.089
<v Speaker 3>And cause it's really smart money driving this Rams number up.

0:51:29.430 --> 0:51:32.890
<v Speaker 3>And it's been interesting just talking to people where even

0:51:33.510 --> 0:51:36.000
<v Speaker 3>probably even the public is a little weary of backing

0:51:36.020 --> 0:51:37.980
<v Speaker 3>the bills, which I am shocked by, which like, I

0:51:38.000 --> 0:51:39.840
<v Speaker 3>just saw the public will blindly bet Josh Allen at

0:51:39.900 --> 0:51:42.800
<v Speaker 3>plus three plus three and a half. So yeah, another

0:51:42.840 --> 0:51:44.660
<v Speaker 3>game where we'll definitely talk about it Sunday. Like I

0:51:44.680 --> 0:51:46.529
<v Speaker 3>just really haven't taken a position. Don't know much to

0:51:46.570 --> 0:51:48.610
<v Speaker 3>say about it where it just, I know the pros,

0:51:48.630 --> 0:51:51.090
<v Speaker 3>the smart people are on the Rams. I'm just missing

0:51:51.110 --> 0:51:53.690
<v Speaker 3>something here where it just, it doesn't feel like it's

0:51:53.730 --> 0:51:55.469
<v Speaker 3>that easy of a bet. There's much to me, there's

0:51:55.510 --> 0:51:57.669
<v Speaker 3>much easier bets to put my money into this week

0:51:57.830 --> 0:52:00.310
<v Speaker 3>and invest in. And I'd be okay losing it where

0:52:00.350 --> 0:52:03.120
<v Speaker 3>if I, if I bet the Rams here and, josh

0:52:03.200 --> 0:52:04.540
<v Speaker 3>on has the ball at the end of the game

0:52:04.600 --> 0:52:06.640
<v Speaker 3>he drives the field kicks a field goal or scores

0:52:06.680 --> 0:52:07.940
<v Speaker 3>a touchdown to win the game it's going to be

0:52:07.980 --> 0:52:10.680
<v Speaker 3>like oh well because he didn't do that last week

0:52:10.700 --> 0:52:12.259
<v Speaker 3>we held that against him and we tried to go

0:52:12.280 --> 0:52:15.740
<v Speaker 3>against him now we look like idiots it's just it's

0:52:15.989 --> 0:52:17.350
<v Speaker 3>it is tough to get a read on this one

0:52:17.410 --> 0:52:18.410
<v Speaker 3>i won't i won't lie to you.

0:52:19.530 --> 0:52:20.910
<v Speaker 1>Um all right so we got a lot of games

0:52:20.930 --> 0:52:23.370
<v Speaker 1>we're going to have to review on sunday i don't

0:52:23.390 --> 0:52:26.370
<v Speaker 1>think we're finding a ton of consensus yet i think

0:52:26.410 --> 0:52:30.709
<v Speaker 1>we're we're still sort of feeling our way a little

0:52:30.750 --> 0:52:36.780
<v Speaker 1>bit simon It's time for the Discord Grouper of the Week.

0:52:38.040 --> 0:52:39.200
<v Speaker 2>Buy my book!

0:52:39.580 --> 0:52:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Buy my book!

0:52:41.040 --> 0:52:42.300
<v Speaker 2>Buy my book!

0:52:45.180 --> 0:52:50.029
<v Speaker 1>We've been talking a lot about listeners and viewers and commenters.

0:52:50.710 --> 0:52:57.989
<v Speaker 1>I will say, we've got an incredibly classy, thoughtful, giving

0:52:58.290 --> 0:53:04.100
<v Speaker 1>group of longtime listeners Listeners, I had said on previous shows,

0:53:04.980 --> 0:53:09.660
<v Speaker 1>for anyone who buys 10 books, I will either, if possible,

0:53:10.719 --> 0:53:15.160
<v Speaker 1>come visit for a mini book club or at least

0:53:15.200 --> 0:53:19.160
<v Speaker 1>do a Zoom video conference with the group that bought

0:53:19.180 --> 0:53:26.089
<v Speaker 1>the 10 books. Email sharporsquareatthevolume.com if you do with your

0:53:26.130 --> 0:53:31.480
<v Speaker 1>proof of purchase. Getting a... A lot of momentum for

0:53:31.560 --> 0:53:36.020
<v Speaker 1>a Southeast. We've got buyers in Charlotte, Atlanta. And then

0:53:36.080 --> 0:53:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Chris Haynes, a buyer in Northern Florida, emailed and said,

0:53:40.700 --> 0:53:43.520
<v Speaker 1>I want to buy the 10 books, but I want

0:53:43.540 --> 0:53:47.420
<v Speaker 1>to donate five books to someone who might not be

0:53:47.480 --> 0:53:51.120
<v Speaker 1>able to otherwise buy the book. I thought this was

0:53:51.160 --> 0:53:55.160
<v Speaker 1>so classy. I told Chris, keep the 10 books. At

0:53:55.200 --> 0:53:56.660
<v Speaker 1>the end of the season, when the book comes out,

0:53:57.060 --> 0:54:00.029
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to donate the five books. We'll do an

0:54:00.390 --> 0:54:03.189
<v Speaker 1>email campaign. And by the way, I will donate another

0:54:03.250 --> 0:54:07.390
<v Speaker 1>book for anyone else who is buying 10 books in

0:54:07.450 --> 0:54:09.610
<v Speaker 1>addition to me trying to get to you or do

0:54:09.690 --> 0:54:12.009
<v Speaker 1>a Zoom. I will just keep adding books to the

0:54:12.050 --> 0:54:14.870
<v Speaker 1>pile that we will give away at the end of

0:54:14.890 --> 0:54:18.390
<v Speaker 1>the year. So thank you, Chris Haynes, for the inspiration

0:54:18.430 --> 0:54:23.390
<v Speaker 1>to get more people reading. In the Discord, meanwhile, which

0:54:23.410 --> 0:54:26.820
<v Speaker 1>you can join, go to readthenumber.com, get the invite, help

0:54:26.860 --> 0:54:29.500
<v Speaker 1>us raise money for St. Jude's. This is just a

0:54:29.540 --> 0:54:35.540
<v Speaker 1>giving campaign. The winner this week, Simon, Seattle, minus three.

0:54:36.050 --> 0:54:39.649
<v Speaker 1>I was stunned by the voting. This was a runaway winner.

0:54:39.690 --> 0:54:41.150
<v Speaker 1>There were a couple of teasers in there. I think

0:54:41.190 --> 0:54:45.730
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans was in there too. Seattle was originally minus

0:54:45.770 --> 0:54:47.890
<v Speaker 1>two and a half. I went and asked people to revote.

0:54:48.610 --> 0:54:51.430
<v Speaker 1>Minus three was still the winner. So we got a

0:54:51.450 --> 0:54:56.470
<v Speaker 1>pretty ballsy group in the discord going with Seattle. It's exciting.

0:54:57.810 --> 0:55:00.630
<v Speaker 2>Totally off topic. Sean Payton. It just got breaking news.

0:55:00.650 --> 0:55:05.009
<v Speaker 3>We'll be heavily involved from now on the offense, which

0:55:05.030 --> 0:55:06.890
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if that's him taking back it, but

0:55:07.030 --> 0:55:09.900
<v Speaker 3>I guess they're still letting web where the, where the

0:55:09.920 --> 0:55:12.320
<v Speaker 3>headset on the sideline, but it feels like Sean Payton,

0:55:12.420 --> 0:55:13.960
<v Speaker 3>that is Sean Payton taking over the play calling.

0:55:14.080 --> 0:55:18.939
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Sean heavily involved basically means 90% of the time.

0:55:19.000 --> 0:55:22.200
<v Speaker 1>He's like overruling or just saying, just do this.

0:55:22.580 --> 0:55:22.799
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:55:23.880 --> 0:55:26.680
<v Speaker 1>And let's move on. That's called parenting. That's I say

0:55:26.719 --> 0:55:28.690
<v Speaker 1>to my kids all the time. That's great. It's been

0:55:28.710 --> 0:55:30.989
<v Speaker 1>a fun debate. Just do what I said because I

0:55:31.050 --> 0:55:34.410
<v Speaker 1>know what I'm doing. You let him go for a

0:55:34.410 --> 0:55:37.430
<v Speaker 1>little while. You let him go for a little while. Well, good.

0:55:37.450 --> 0:55:39.589
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad I haven't heavily invested in the Chargers because

0:55:39.610 --> 0:55:43.109
<v Speaker 1>the Chargers are probably the right side, but I have

0:55:43.150 --> 0:55:46.590
<v Speaker 1>no faith with them having all the offensive line injuries.

0:55:47.890 --> 0:55:49.779
<v Speaker 1>And now with Sean Payton deciding he's going to get

0:55:49.820 --> 0:55:55.759
<v Speaker 1>back into the mix. So, Simon, our underdog, round robin, parlay.

0:55:57.440 --> 0:56:01.780
<v Speaker 2>My dog likes your dog. Your dog likes my dog.

0:56:02.800 --> 0:56:04.320
<v Speaker 2>I say this week we only do three because I

0:56:04.340 --> 0:56:05.480
<v Speaker 2>don't love that many.

0:56:05.560 --> 0:56:07.480
<v Speaker 3>I like the favorites this week. There's not that many

0:56:07.520 --> 0:56:11.239
<v Speaker 3>dogs I love. Get the Saints in there, plus 115. Again,

0:56:11.260 --> 0:56:13.840
<v Speaker 3>there's not a lot of dogs we love.

0:56:13.880 --> 0:56:15.140
<v Speaker 2>Should we get Josh Allen in there?

0:56:15.160 --> 0:56:16.430
<v Speaker 1>I was going to say, I think we have to

0:56:16.469 --> 0:56:17.259
<v Speaker 1>put Buffalo in.

0:56:17.840 --> 0:56:19.430
<v Speaker 3>And then go back to the ball. I know they

0:56:19.450 --> 0:56:23.930
<v Speaker 3>burned us last week. Raiders, plus 164. Unless there's another

0:56:23.969 --> 0:56:24.390
<v Speaker 3>dog that.

0:56:24.310 --> 0:56:24.850
<v Speaker 2>Jumps out to you.

0:56:25.060 --> 0:56:26.980
<v Speaker 1>Well, I was going to say this, uh, the saints.

0:56:27.760 --> 0:56:29.030
<v Speaker 2>We did. I did saints one plus one.

0:56:29.040 --> 0:56:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Oh, that's right. You did. You read the saints plus

0:56:30.600 --> 0:56:36.000
<v Speaker 1>one 15. Yeah. So saints, uh, bills and then, uh,

0:56:36.910 --> 0:56:39.490
<v Speaker 1>favorites round Robin.

0:56:40.489 --> 0:56:41.130
<v Speaker 2>Really fun week.

0:56:41.190 --> 0:56:42.990
<v Speaker 3>If you like doing favorites, like if you want to do,

0:56:43.310 --> 0:56:45.870
<v Speaker 3>you know, tease the Cowboys down to two and a half,

0:56:45.930 --> 0:56:47.690
<v Speaker 3>throw them in there. You want to, you want the

0:56:47.730 --> 0:56:49.490
<v Speaker 3>bangles and I can get them down to half a point,

0:56:50.130 --> 0:56:54.489
<v Speaker 3>put them in there. Um, I mean, you could do

0:56:54.530 --> 0:56:58.710
<v Speaker 3>the Jaguars. Like it's just another one where this week

0:56:58.750 --> 0:57:00.610
<v Speaker 3>feels like you're going to go four and one this round, Robin,

0:57:00.630 --> 0:57:09.260
<v Speaker 3>if you do all these teasers. So Detroit, Jaguars, Cowboys, Bengals, Texans.

0:57:10.100 --> 0:57:12.140
<v Speaker 3>It's really that simple. Like the public's going to do it.

0:57:12.680 --> 0:57:15.700
<v Speaker 3>Maybe you go three and two. I just, I have

0:57:15.739 --> 0:57:18.260
<v Speaker 3>a hard time this week seeing a bunch of upsets.

0:57:18.300 --> 0:57:20.689
<v Speaker 3>We've had some really good upsets this year. We usually

0:57:20.710 --> 0:57:21.290
<v Speaker 3>get into a little.

0:57:21.170 --> 0:57:21.890
<v Speaker 2>Bit of pattern here.

0:57:22.300 --> 0:57:25.460
<v Speaker 3>Where the good teams do just win. It's just the

0:57:25.500 --> 0:57:27.800
<v Speaker 3>way it goes. The bad teams, they're not going to

0:57:27.820 --> 0:57:30.680
<v Speaker 3>pull up these crazy upsets every week. Out of that

0:57:30.800 --> 0:57:32.720
<v Speaker 3>list I just gave, Chad, what two teams do you

0:57:32.740 --> 0:57:33.740
<v Speaker 3>think could pull off the other? Do you think the

0:57:33.760 --> 0:57:34.940
<v Speaker 3>Eagles could do it? Do you think the Bucs could

0:57:34.980 --> 0:57:38.160
<v Speaker 3>do it? Do you think Miami's that team? You look

0:57:38.200 --> 0:57:39.860
<v Speaker 3>at this list and it's like, yeah, we could see

0:57:39.880 --> 0:57:43.560
<v Speaker 3>it happening, but that just feels like 5-0, 4-1, 3-2

0:57:43.580 --> 0:57:46.220
<v Speaker 3>on the teasers if you just tease down all these

0:57:46.260 --> 0:57:46.860
<v Speaker 3>big favorites.

0:57:47.540 --> 0:57:52.370
<v Speaker 1>I look at this and think, Detroit's defense is so bad.

0:57:54.170 --> 0:58:00.870
<v Speaker 1>Jacoby Brissett, miracle game. And totally think that the Bengals

0:58:00.910 --> 0:58:04.010
<v Speaker 1>are just a historically train wreck enough of a franchise

0:58:04.760 --> 0:58:07.880
<v Speaker 1>that Miami could easily win that game. Those are the

0:58:07.940 --> 0:58:11.200
<v Speaker 1>two where I'm like, all right, if crazy things are

0:58:11.220 --> 0:58:14.439
<v Speaker 1>going to happen, which always happens, you don't know, that's

0:58:14.480 --> 0:58:17.260
<v Speaker 1>part of the fun. Those to me are the two

0:58:17.320 --> 0:58:23.290
<v Speaker 1>that could totally... Totally screw us. Simon, your biggest bets.

0:58:24.050 --> 0:58:26.350
<v Speaker 1>Pull up those pants and be a man.

0:58:26.990 --> 0:58:29.110
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, I talked about Houston. I was really

0:58:29.130 --> 0:58:32.610
<v Speaker 3>having them six and a half, seven. We'll see Sunday

0:58:32.630 --> 0:58:34.230
<v Speaker 3>morning if I'm going to have more seven and a half.

0:58:34.250 --> 0:58:35.570
<v Speaker 3>But right now, I'm just trying to be patient and

0:58:35.610 --> 0:58:37.590
<v Speaker 3>hope that professionals or whoever come on the other side

0:58:37.630 --> 0:58:40.330
<v Speaker 3>of Tennessee get me back under that key number of seven.

0:58:41.720 --> 0:58:44.220
<v Speaker 3>Saints plus two and a half. Some shots, I think

0:58:44.240 --> 0:58:45.520
<v Speaker 3>we'll get back to two and a half. I just,

0:58:45.940 --> 0:58:48.040
<v Speaker 3>I view the public will come in heavy on Minnesota.

0:58:48.060 --> 0:58:50.940
<v Speaker 3>They just have so many great Underlying numbers on their defense.

0:58:51.580 --> 0:58:54.000
<v Speaker 3>Saints got embarrassed in a primetime game. It's only going

0:58:54.020 --> 0:58:57.680
<v Speaker 3>to be professionals taking that side right now on the Saints.

0:58:58.560 --> 0:59:00.700
<v Speaker 2>I'm heavily betting to Atlanta. I talked about that.

0:59:00.700 --> 0:59:03.330
<v Speaker 3>Some books have moved them back down to minus three.

0:59:03.330 --> 0:59:05.700
<v Speaker 3>I mean, if you want to get enjoyment in the party,

0:59:05.700 --> 0:59:08.030
<v Speaker 3>I don't hate that number. I just i would be

0:59:08.070 --> 0:59:09.890
<v Speaker 3>truly shocked if lamar plays and if he does play

0:59:09.910 --> 0:59:12.240
<v Speaker 3>i just think he's gonna be totally hampered so it

0:59:12.260 --> 0:59:14.300
<v Speaker 3>just i get it you want to fade atlanta right

0:59:14.360 --> 0:59:16.160
<v Speaker 3>it's just eventually they're not going to keep putting up

0:59:16.160 --> 0:59:20.320
<v Speaker 3>40 points every week why not we've not seen this

0:59:20.400 --> 0:59:24.000
<v Speaker 3>ravens team be that great defensively so it's also i

0:59:25.500 --> 0:59:28.400
<v Speaker 3>think another good matchup for them indoors against that team

0:59:28.440 --> 0:59:31.230
<v Speaker 3>and that defense and Another big bet. And one of

0:59:31.250 --> 0:59:33.430
<v Speaker 3>me and Chad talked about our big balls, better the

0:59:33.470 --> 0:59:36.550
<v Speaker 3>week commanders minus three and a half. I've just, I've

0:59:36.570 --> 0:59:39.190
<v Speaker 3>just been betting it thinking that if it, if, if

0:59:39.230 --> 0:59:41.840
<v Speaker 3>Daniel's full go and it's all good, I could easily

0:59:41.860 --> 0:59:43.360
<v Speaker 3>see this bet jump up to four and a half.

0:59:43.470 --> 0:59:46.380
<v Speaker 3>Like this could keep going up. So that's another one

0:59:46.400 --> 0:59:49.240
<v Speaker 3>I've taken a larger position on someday in the morning.

0:59:49.260 --> 0:59:51.020
<v Speaker 3>We'll talk more about it. I just, I could see

0:59:51.060 --> 0:59:53.380
<v Speaker 3>myself betting more money into this Miami team and to

0:59:53.420 --> 0:59:54.100
<v Speaker 3>this Raiders team.

0:59:54.500 --> 0:59:55.820
<v Speaker 2>I'm just, I'm just waiting to see what's going to

0:59:55.840 --> 0:59:56.800
<v Speaker 2>go on with these numbers right now.

0:59:57.840 --> 1:00:01.360
<v Speaker 1>All right. Sharp versus square last week. I had Las

1:00:01.440 --> 1:00:03.980
<v Speaker 1>Vegas plus four and a half. That was a winner.

1:00:04.620 --> 1:00:08.400
<v Speaker 1>It says here that you had Cincinnati minus two and

1:00:08.420 --> 1:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>a half.

1:00:09.300 --> 1:00:09.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1:00:10.740 --> 1:00:11.600
<v Speaker 1>That one did not win.

1:00:12.140 --> 1:00:13.720
<v Speaker 2>It did not.

1:00:14.590 --> 1:00:24.230
<v Speaker 1>So right now I get to go first. I can't

1:00:24.290 --> 1:00:28.270
<v Speaker 1>quit this Houston team. It's a bad number, but I,

1:00:30.320 --> 1:00:32.890
<v Speaker 1>They got to win this. It can't be 0-4. They

1:00:32.930 --> 1:00:36.690
<v Speaker 1>got to dominate. So I'm going to go with Houston.

1:00:37.130 --> 1:00:38.710
<v Speaker 1>I guess I'm taking minus seven and a half. I

1:00:38.750 --> 1:00:39.890
<v Speaker 1>got to take the numbers available.

1:00:40.830 --> 1:00:41.050
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1:00:42.280 --> 1:00:42.570
<v Speaker 3>All right.

1:00:46.120 --> 1:00:53.280
<v Speaker 2>I'll join you on the chalk. I'll go. Give me Detroit.

1:00:53.300 --> 1:00:53.920
<v Speaker 2>I'll go Lions.

1:00:54.680 --> 1:00:58.350
<v Speaker 1>Interesting. Interesting. All right. Survivor.

1:00:58.370 --> 1:00:58.450
<v Speaker 2>Look.

1:01:00.000 --> 1:01:01.620
<v Speaker 1>Texans big favorites on the road.

1:01:02.380 --> 1:01:02.580
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1:01:02.600 --> 1:01:04.620
<v Speaker 1>Bengals big favorites on the road.

1:01:04.780 --> 1:01:06.230
<v Speaker 3>You got to use one of the two people. That's

1:01:06.270 --> 1:01:08.050
<v Speaker 3>my view of it. Like it's just, it's hard to

1:01:08.090 --> 1:01:10.590
<v Speaker 3>know when you're going to use them again. If you're

1:01:10.610 --> 1:01:13.410
<v Speaker 3>telling me what's the best spot between the two, the

1:01:13.430 --> 1:01:14.920
<v Speaker 3>safer spot, more confident spot for me.

1:01:14.950 --> 1:01:16.630
<v Speaker 2>I think Chad's on agreeance. It's Houston.

1:01:17.030 --> 1:01:18.030
<v Speaker 1>A hundred percent.

1:01:18.550 --> 1:01:20.100
<v Speaker 3>You just expect a stream roll here where I can

1:01:20.200 --> 1:01:22.360
<v Speaker 3>see a way of the Bengals blow this and lose

1:01:22.400 --> 1:01:26.060
<v Speaker 3>this game where could, could Tennessee cover that game?

1:01:26.120 --> 1:01:26.360
<v Speaker 2>Sure.

1:01:26.580 --> 1:01:28.860
<v Speaker 3>But when it, I just, I just cannot see it.

1:01:28.940 --> 1:01:31.860
<v Speaker 3>That the, D'Amico is going to have those boys running

1:01:31.880 --> 1:01:37.080
<v Speaker 3>through a wall this week. So, yeah, I'm telling people

1:01:37.500 --> 1:01:40.520
<v Speaker 3>more than 55% of mine will most likely be on Houston.

1:01:40.540 --> 1:01:42.040
<v Speaker 2>At this point, at one point, it was 100% where

1:01:42.120 --> 1:01:43.400
<v Speaker 2>it was going to be on the Bengals.

1:01:44.200 --> 1:01:45.820
<v Speaker 3>I've just pulled it back just because of all this

1:01:45.860 --> 1:01:48.990
<v Speaker 3>professional money coming in on Miami. I'll talk more about

1:01:49.010 --> 1:01:50.850
<v Speaker 3>it Sunday morning if anything's changed. But as we say

1:01:50.890 --> 1:01:53.230
<v Speaker 3>right now, 55% of my contests on Houston, 45% are

1:01:53.510 --> 1:01:53.950
<v Speaker 3>on the Bengals.

1:01:55.670 --> 1:01:57.710
<v Speaker 1>That's our show. We'll be back Sunday morning with our

1:01:57.790 --> 1:02:00.770
<v Speaker 1>final NFL Week 5 bets. We'll give out our official

1:02:00.830 --> 1:02:05.169
<v Speaker 1>picks for the free $ 25, 000 Pro Football Pick'em Contest. Sign

1:02:05.230 --> 1:02:10.640
<v Speaker 1>up now, sharpersquare.thevolume.com. You can join it for free. This

1:02:10.660 --> 1:02:14.060
<v Speaker 1>has been Sharper Square presented by Polymarket, part of the

1:02:14.100 --> 1:02:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Volume Podcast Network. Watch or listen on YouTube at Sharper Square.

1:02:18.280 --> 1:02:21.740
<v Speaker 1>Like the video, subscribe to the channel, download us on Spotify,

1:02:21.760 --> 1:02:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Apple Pods, wherever you get your pods, rate, review, subscribe,

1:02:26.840 --> 1:02:29.220
<v Speaker 1>leave us five stars. Feedback is a gift. You know

1:02:29.260 --> 1:02:32.260
<v Speaker 1>we love it because we keep talking about it until Sunday.

1:02:32.600 --> 1:02:37.680
<v Speaker 1>Love you. Hi, everybody. I'm Bob Costas along with Nick Bonacante.

1:02:37.740 --> 1:02:40.920
<v Speaker 3>And Nick, the assignment for Eagles, bounce back and forget

1:02:40.940 --> 1:02:43.530
<v Speaker 3>about last week's 20-0 defeat at Los Angeles.

1:02:43.760 --> 1:02:46.450
<v Speaker 2>Anemic Eagle offense last week reveals that he has a

1:02:46.470 --> 1:02:49.090
<v Speaker 2>leadership ability to turn the Eagles offense around.