WEBVTT - Week in Tech: Turning China's Surveillance Against Itself

0:00:13.800 --> 0:00:17.400
<v Speaker 1>From Kaleidoscope and iHeart podcasts. This is tech stuff. I'm

0:00:17.400 --> 0:00:18.400
<v Speaker 1>as Voloscian and.

0:00:18.360 --> 0:00:19.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm care Price.

0:00:19.440 --> 0:00:22.119
<v Speaker 1>Today we get into what it's like to be a

0:00:22.200 --> 0:00:25.600
<v Speaker 1>human who trains AI for a living, and the story

0:00:25.640 --> 0:00:29.120
<v Speaker 1>of an activist who turned the surveillance state against the

0:00:29.200 --> 0:00:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Chinese government. Then on chatting me, a real life therapist

0:00:33.680 --> 0:00:35.760
<v Speaker 1>talks about how he uses AI.

0:00:36.200 --> 0:00:38.879
<v Speaker 3>It felt like a steady partner. But I call a

0:00:39.000 --> 0:00:44.040
<v Speaker 3>cognitive prosthesis, not thinking for me, but helping me organize

0:00:44.080 --> 0:00:46.960
<v Speaker 3>and extend my own thinking. The way of walking, stick

0:00:47.080 --> 0:00:48.160
<v Speaker 3>supportune as.

0:00:48.120 --> 0:00:53.159
<v Speaker 1>You walk, all of that. On the Weekend Tech, It's Friday, September.

0:00:52.640 --> 0:01:02.200
<v Speaker 2>Twelfth, Hi Cara, Hi ahs.

0:01:02.440 --> 0:01:05.600
<v Speaker 1>So normally we record these together in studio, but this

0:01:05.640 --> 0:01:08.520
<v Speaker 1>week I'm in a hotel room in Munich, Germany, at

0:01:08.520 --> 0:01:11.440
<v Speaker 1>a conference called DLD Digital Life Design.

0:01:11.680 --> 0:01:15.039
<v Speaker 2>It sounds very lively. How is it?

0:01:15.040 --> 0:01:17.040
<v Speaker 1>It's good? You know, are you familiar with this concept

0:01:17.040 --> 0:01:19.920
<v Speaker 1>of ambient AI that they're using medical settings?

0:01:19.959 --> 0:01:22.040
<v Speaker 2>Sort of yes? Can you just tell me a little

0:01:22.080 --> 0:01:22.560
<v Speaker 2>bit about it?

0:01:22.800 --> 0:01:27.479
<v Speaker 1>So basically, it's like cameras and sound recording in settings

0:01:27.520 --> 0:01:30.640
<v Speaker 1>where like a person doesn't have to go and use AI.

0:01:30.800 --> 0:01:33.240
<v Speaker 1>AI is just running in the background and feeding back

0:01:33.319 --> 0:01:35.759
<v Speaker 1>kind of insights and data. And so there's a talk

0:01:35.880 --> 0:01:39.800
<v Speaker 1>yesterday about this being used in hotel settings for food,

0:01:39.800 --> 0:01:43.400
<v Speaker 1>which I found pretty interesting. But apparently using this technology

0:01:43.560 --> 0:01:46.120
<v Speaker 1>has in some cases reduced food waste in hotels by

0:01:46.120 --> 0:01:47.400
<v Speaker 1>an average of forty percent.

0:01:47.800 --> 0:01:50.040
<v Speaker 2>What does ambient AI look like in this case, Like,

0:01:50.120 --> 0:01:53.000
<v Speaker 2>is it like a panopticon or people getting publicly shamed?

0:01:54.560 --> 0:01:56.240
<v Speaker 1>Well, it is a bit like a panopticon, but the

0:01:56.320 --> 0:01:59.160
<v Speaker 1>customers are not being publicly shamed on their third trip

0:01:59.200 --> 0:02:02.600
<v Speaker 1>to the buffet. Basically, there are cameras and there's also

0:02:02.640 --> 0:02:07.520
<v Speaker 1>a weighing device for trash bins, and so it will

0:02:07.600 --> 0:02:10.359
<v Speaker 1>track the food at the end of the buffet being

0:02:10.760 --> 0:02:13.720
<v Speaker 1>transported by the servers to the trash and thrown out

0:02:13.760 --> 0:02:16.840
<v Speaker 1>and then being weighed. And the insights and not rocket science.

0:02:16.880 --> 0:02:20.400
<v Speaker 1>It's like, hey, guys, don't fill the bread basket fifteen

0:02:20.440 --> 0:02:22.800
<v Speaker 1>minutes before the service ends. Like things that once you

0:02:22.880 --> 0:02:25.360
<v Speaker 1>hear them, are obvious, but actually it's interesting that like

0:02:25.600 --> 0:02:28.680
<v Speaker 1>being told it by technology actually apparently makes a real difference.

0:02:29.120 --> 0:02:31.959
<v Speaker 2>I remember when you and I many now many years

0:02:32.000 --> 0:02:34.920
<v Speaker 2>ago went to speak at Johns Hopkins. They told us

0:02:34.960 --> 0:02:39.160
<v Speaker 2>about connected devices that nurses wear to make hospital work

0:02:39.240 --> 0:02:41.360
<v Speaker 2>more efficient. So I think this is something that we

0:02:41.360 --> 0:02:44.639
<v Speaker 2>should pay attention to. But speaking of digital life design,

0:02:44.840 --> 0:02:46.360
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if you saw this article in the

0:02:46.360 --> 0:02:49.640
<v Speaker 2>Wall Street Journal called My Day as an eighty year old?

0:02:49.680 --> 0:02:51.160
<v Speaker 2>What an age simulation suit?

0:02:51.160 --> 0:02:52.720
<v Speaker 1>Top me? Did you see this? I saw the email

0:02:52.760 --> 0:02:54.240
<v Speaker 1>and I was fascinated, But tell me more.

0:02:54.400 --> 0:02:59.440
<v Speaker 2>Basically, MIT has created this age simulation suit, which is

0:02:59.480 --> 0:03:02.160
<v Speaker 2>a full body suit that was built by scientists at

0:03:02.160 --> 0:03:05.120
<v Speaker 2>the Age Lab, which does research on how to improve

0:03:05.240 --> 0:03:08.040
<v Speaker 2>life for the elderly. So the journalists who wrote the article,

0:03:08.160 --> 0:03:10.880
<v Speaker 2>her name is Amy, doctor Marcus, and she recently wore it,

0:03:10.919 --> 0:03:12.720
<v Speaker 2>and that's what you know she wrote this article about.

0:03:12.760 --> 0:03:15.880
<v Speaker 2>And she said she was fitted with just imagine this,

0:03:15.960 --> 0:03:19.840
<v Speaker 2>a fifteen pound weighted vest, more weights on her ankles

0:03:19.840 --> 0:03:23.480
<v Speaker 2>and wrists to kind of stimulate the loss of muscle mass.

0:03:23.600 --> 0:03:26.720
<v Speaker 2>And the suit also had this very elaborate bungee cord

0:03:26.840 --> 0:03:30.960
<v Speaker 2>system and a neck collar that limited her mobility. She

0:03:31.000 --> 0:03:33.800
<v Speaker 2>also had glasses. And there's great photos you if people

0:03:33.800 --> 0:03:36.120
<v Speaker 2>who are listening want to look it up on the

0:03:36.160 --> 0:03:38.640
<v Speaker 2>Wall Street Journal. There's these great photos of like what

0:03:38.680 --> 0:03:41.960
<v Speaker 2>her distorted vision looks like she also wore padded crocs

0:03:42.000 --> 0:03:43.560
<v Speaker 2>that made it really hard to balance.

0:03:44.000 --> 0:03:45.560
<v Speaker 1>This sounds like hell.

0:03:45.360 --> 0:03:49.040
<v Speaker 2>It sounds like the worst hangover of your life. Basically, yeah,

0:03:49.200 --> 0:03:53.400
<v Speaker 2>MIT calls the suit agnes, which is an acronym for

0:03:53.640 --> 0:03:55.680
<v Speaker 2>age gain now empathy system.

0:03:55.800 --> 0:03:58.440
<v Speaker 1>That's about acronym. It sounds when I a bachronym that

0:03:58.600 --> 0:04:01.440
<v Speaker 1>I but I get it. What made the story stand

0:04:01.480 --> 0:04:01.840
<v Speaker 1>out to you?

0:04:02.080 --> 0:04:04.840
<v Speaker 2>So you know, I think it's a very interesting lesson

0:04:04.840 --> 0:04:07.160
<v Speaker 2>in empathy, or a lesson in schlepping if you come

0:04:07.200 --> 0:04:11.760
<v Speaker 2>from my culture. But it's actually a part of a

0:04:11.840 --> 0:04:14.920
<v Speaker 2>longer arc of product research for older people, which I'm

0:04:15.000 --> 0:04:18.839
<v Speaker 2>very interested in as someone who has an aging parent

0:04:18.920 --> 0:04:21.839
<v Speaker 2>who is very young its spirit. I think it's a

0:04:21.880 --> 0:04:24.440
<v Speaker 2>real test of our empathy to understand how people who

0:04:24.440 --> 0:04:27.000
<v Speaker 2>are older than us navigate the world. And there was

0:04:27.040 --> 0:04:29.640
<v Speaker 2>this woman who I became obsessed with many years ago

0:04:29.720 --> 0:04:32.360
<v Speaker 2>named Patricia Moore. Patty Moore? Have you ever heard of her?

0:04:32.560 --> 0:04:33.000
<v Speaker 1>I haven't.

0:04:33.240 --> 0:04:36.640
<v Speaker 2>So she is most famous for pioneering an approach called

0:04:36.760 --> 0:04:41.240
<v Speaker 2>universal design, which basically means designing products and spaces with

0:04:41.360 --> 0:04:44.880
<v Speaker 2>empathy for the widest possible audience in mind. So like,

0:04:45.520 --> 0:04:48.920
<v Speaker 2>will this refrigerator be something that a ninety year old

0:04:48.960 --> 0:04:50.360
<v Speaker 2>can open, for example.

0:04:50.560 --> 0:04:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's interesting, and I guess it's kind of become

0:04:52.839 --> 0:04:54.920
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a standard now. I'm not sure if

0:04:55.000 --> 0:04:58.119
<v Speaker 1>companies always do it, but certainly companies always talk about

0:04:58.160 --> 0:05:01.920
<v Speaker 1>the idea they don't want to design products with the

0:05:01.960 --> 0:05:05.719
<v Speaker 1>healthy mid thirties product designer in mind as the user,

0:05:06.000 --> 0:05:07.920
<v Speaker 1>but they won't have a wider view on how these

0:05:07.960 --> 0:05:10.560
<v Speaker 1>products might be used by people different ageas people with

0:05:10.560 --> 0:05:11.839
<v Speaker 1>different abilities, that kind of thing.

0:05:12.040 --> 0:05:15.640
<v Speaker 2>To your point, it wasn't always a consideration. And when

0:05:15.680 --> 0:05:18.640
<v Speaker 2>Patty was twenty six years old, this is in nineteen

0:05:18.680 --> 0:05:21.000
<v Speaker 2>seventy nine. I'm giving away her age, and I know

0:05:21.040 --> 0:05:22.520
<v Speaker 2>she's going to listen to this because she's a friend

0:05:22.560 --> 0:05:22.800
<v Speaker 2>of mine.

0:05:22.800 --> 0:05:25.320
<v Speaker 1>But so she's been at this. She's been at this

0:05:25.600 --> 0:05:27.120
<v Speaker 1>since way before it was popular.

0:05:27.279 --> 0:05:29.760
<v Speaker 2>She worked at Raymond Lowie. There was some grant from

0:05:29.760 --> 0:05:33.080
<v Speaker 2>the Nixon administration that allowed her to have the job

0:05:33.120 --> 0:05:36.200
<v Speaker 2>that she had, But she was one of the only

0:05:36.320 --> 0:05:39.760
<v Speaker 2>people who was bringing up any kind of conversation about

0:05:40.160 --> 0:05:44.720
<v Speaker 2>product design for the elderly and how we can engage

0:05:44.720 --> 0:05:48.279
<v Speaker 2>in a conversation about that. But what she did that

0:05:48.400 --> 0:05:52.880
<v Speaker 2>is so kind of different. But ingenius visa vi agnes Is.

0:05:52.960 --> 0:05:55.520
<v Speaker 2>She got a friend of hers who was a makeup

0:05:55.600 --> 0:05:59.479
<v Speaker 2>artist from Saturday Night Live, to turn her into an

0:05:59.520 --> 0:06:03.719
<v Speaker 2>eighty five year old woman. She traveled around the country

0:06:03.839 --> 0:06:07.280
<v Speaker 2>in these outfits essentially, and she got a really good

0:06:07.320 --> 0:06:10.520
<v Speaker 2>sense of what it was like to live as an

0:06:10.520 --> 0:06:13.680
<v Speaker 2>elderly person in the world in the late nineteen seventies.

0:06:13.920 --> 0:06:16.719
<v Speaker 2>After she did this, she went on to be a

0:06:16.720 --> 0:06:20.760
<v Speaker 2>product engineer and she has based her entire career on

0:06:21.440 --> 0:06:24.440
<v Speaker 2>creating more accessible products, like you know, good grips. She

0:06:24.600 --> 0:06:26.960
<v Speaker 2>was a very sort of integral part of the design

0:06:27.000 --> 0:06:29.680
<v Speaker 2>of easily grippable devices for the kitchen and the home.

0:06:29.920 --> 0:06:32.840
<v Speaker 2>She also worked on transit systems, medical devices, and now

0:06:32.880 --> 0:06:35.880
<v Speaker 2>she actually spends a lot of time consulting tech companies

0:06:35.920 --> 0:06:38.920
<v Speaker 2>on how to make their products more inclusive for elderly people.

0:06:39.040 --> 0:06:42.159
<v Speaker 1>To me, it's interesting tech then and now story because

0:06:42.160 --> 0:06:44.679
<v Speaker 1>in the seventies, like to do this kind of research,

0:06:44.720 --> 0:06:48.120
<v Speaker 1>you'd have to invent your own costumes and characters and

0:06:48.160 --> 0:06:50.159
<v Speaker 1>process and go to a TV show to help you

0:06:50.200 --> 0:06:53.440
<v Speaker 1>achieve it. And now MIT has this age scented lab

0:06:53.480 --> 0:06:55.279
<v Speaker 1>where you can just put on the agnes suit for

0:06:55.320 --> 0:06:57.720
<v Speaker 1>a day, but of course, the motivation is the same,

0:06:57.880 --> 0:06:59.360
<v Speaker 1>and part of that might speak to the fact that,

0:06:59.560 --> 0:07:02.200
<v Speaker 1>howe him, we want to pay lip service the idea

0:07:02.200 --> 0:07:05.080
<v Speaker 1>of designing for all kinds of different people, it remains

0:07:05.279 --> 0:07:06.720
<v Speaker 1>very hard to pull off.

0:07:06.680 --> 0:07:09.360
<v Speaker 2>It does. I think the one thing that's interesting about

0:07:09.360 --> 0:07:11.880
<v Speaker 2>the Angle and the Journal piece is that the Age

0:07:11.920 --> 0:07:16.800
<v Speaker 2>Lab is trying to also understand how to prepare people

0:07:16.880 --> 0:07:20.520
<v Speaker 2>who are aging into their eighties to live better. And

0:07:20.560 --> 0:07:23.560
<v Speaker 2>it's really about how do you keep people staying young

0:07:23.680 --> 0:07:24.920
<v Speaker 2>even though they're not young anymore?

0:07:25.120 --> 0:07:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Right, right, right, Well, it's all only either beholder. Do

0:07:28.520 --> 0:07:32.560
<v Speaker 1>you know two people who are very interested in staying

0:07:32.600 --> 0:07:36.320
<v Speaker 1>young even if they age in terms of their physical bodies?

0:07:36.480 --> 0:07:39.480
<v Speaker 2>Every woman I know, and many.

0:07:41.960 --> 0:07:45.679
<v Speaker 1>But now in this case, I'm talking about Vladimir Putin

0:07:45.920 --> 0:07:49.280
<v Speaker 1>and Shechinping. The two of them are attending a military

0:07:49.280 --> 0:07:53.480
<v Speaker 1>parade in Beijing, officially to celebrate the eightieth anniversary of

0:07:53.640 --> 0:07:57.040
<v Speaker 1>the end of World War II. Unofficially, of course, to

0:07:57.120 --> 0:08:00.480
<v Speaker 1>show the US and Taiwan. Then you ask some of

0:08:00.560 --> 0:08:03.960
<v Speaker 1>high tech weaponry. But anyway, Putin and she were walking

0:08:04.000 --> 0:08:07.720
<v Speaker 1>together when a hot might caught them having a really

0:08:08.040 --> 0:08:11.760
<v Speaker 1>bizarre conversation. I'll read it to you. So Putin's interpreter

0:08:11.880 --> 0:08:17.680
<v Speaker 1>says in Chinese, quote, biotechnology is continuously developing. Then he adds,

0:08:17.960 --> 0:08:24.200
<v Speaker 1>quote human organs can be continuously transplanted. The longer you live,

0:08:25.120 --> 0:08:29.440
<v Speaker 1>the younger you become, and you can even achieve immortality.

0:08:30.280 --> 0:08:34.640
<v Speaker 1>She responds, quote some predict that in this century humans

0:08:34.640 --> 0:08:36.720
<v Speaker 1>may live to one hundred and fifty years old.

0:08:37.200 --> 0:08:40.600
<v Speaker 2>Just imagine that your small talk is about organ transplantation.

0:08:41.360 --> 0:08:45.959
<v Speaker 1>Continuous organ transplantation. I mean once once, you might think

0:08:45.960 --> 0:08:46.560
<v Speaker 1>will be enough.

0:08:46.679 --> 0:08:51.680
<v Speaker 2>It's unbelievable. And that's their casual conversation, the most powerful

0:08:51.720 --> 0:08:52.560
<v Speaker 2>people in the world.

0:08:53.480 --> 0:08:56.120
<v Speaker 1>The reason I came across this is because I'm quite

0:08:56.120 --> 0:08:58.600
<v Speaker 1>interested in defense tech and I was looking for the

0:08:58.640 --> 0:09:01.800
<v Speaker 1>most interesting angle on this military parade in Beijing to

0:09:01.840 --> 0:09:04.520
<v Speaker 1>bring to the show. And there was fascinating stuff about

0:09:04.600 --> 0:09:08.120
<v Speaker 1>new anti drone technologies, new kinds of lasers, et cetera,

0:09:08.160 --> 0:09:12.200
<v Speaker 1>et cetera. But actually the most interesting story I've found

0:09:12.679 --> 0:09:15.160
<v Speaker 1>had nothing to do with the military parade. In fact,

0:09:15.240 --> 0:09:17.760
<v Speaker 1>it was all about what happened the night before.

0:09:18.080 --> 0:09:19.000
<v Speaker 2>Tell me about it.

0:09:19.160 --> 0:09:22.520
<v Speaker 1>So, around ten pm last Friday night in chong Qing,

0:09:23.080 --> 0:09:26.520
<v Speaker 1>a huge projection against the skyscraper went up calling for

0:09:26.559 --> 0:09:29.920
<v Speaker 1>an end to the Communist Party's rule. It included slogans

0:09:29.960 --> 0:09:32.880
<v Speaker 1>like quote only without the Communist Party, can there be

0:09:32.880 --> 0:09:36.080
<v Speaker 1>a new China? End quote, no more lies, we want

0:09:36.080 --> 0:09:39.000
<v Speaker 1>the truth, no more slavery, we want freedom.

0:09:39.120 --> 0:09:42.080
<v Speaker 2>And how long did that stay up? Like ten seconds?

0:09:42.640 --> 0:09:47.360
<v Speaker 1>Well an hour? But actually this is where things get

0:09:47.360 --> 0:09:50.040
<v Speaker 1>more interesting and more tech stuff. A few hours after

0:09:50.080 --> 0:09:53.560
<v Speaker 1>the projection was shut off, the activist who staged the protest,

0:09:53.800 --> 0:09:57.480
<v Speaker 1>See Hoong, posted this video showing five police officers bursting

0:09:57.520 --> 0:10:00.200
<v Speaker 1>into the hotel room where the projector was and then

0:10:00.280 --> 0:10:02.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of bumbling around trying to turn it off. That

0:10:02.800 --> 0:10:05.640
<v Speaker 1>at one point one of the policemen notice, smile your

0:10:05.679 --> 0:10:08.240
<v Speaker 1>on candid camera. There's actually a camera pointing at them,

0:10:08.320 --> 0:10:11.000
<v Speaker 1>and he rushes towards it, looking really surprised. And then

0:10:11.640 --> 0:10:13.920
<v Speaker 1>he looks down and sees as a note underneath the

0:10:13.960 --> 0:10:17.280
<v Speaker 1>camera saying, even if you are a beneficiary of the

0:10:17.320 --> 0:10:20.720
<v Speaker 1>system today, one day you will inevitably become a victim

0:10:20.760 --> 0:10:23.880
<v Speaker 1>on this land, so please treat the people with kindness.

0:10:24.240 --> 0:10:26.440
<v Speaker 1>But it plays out almost like a Marx Brothers film.

0:10:26.440 --> 0:10:28.960
<v Speaker 1>They burst into the room, they're confused, and they realize

0:10:29.000 --> 0:10:31.160
<v Speaker 1>that they're kind of the victims of this prank.

0:10:31.600 --> 0:10:33.160
<v Speaker 2>Did he get in trouble for this.

0:10:33.280 --> 0:10:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Well, he would have gone into terrible trouble, but of

0:10:35.160 --> 0:10:37.120
<v Speaker 1>course he wasn't in the hotel room. That was the

0:10:37.160 --> 0:10:39.880
<v Speaker 1>whole joke of just a camera. He'd fed the country

0:10:39.920 --> 0:10:42.960
<v Speaker 1>with his family a week before the protest was turned on,

0:10:43.559 --> 0:10:45.959
<v Speaker 1>and in fact he turned it on remotely. But one

0:10:45.960 --> 0:10:48.559
<v Speaker 1>of his brothers along with a friend of his were

0:10:48.559 --> 0:10:53.120
<v Speaker 1>both detained, and authorities also questioned his elderly mother outside

0:10:53.160 --> 0:10:56.360
<v Speaker 1>her home. Now talk about Agnes elderly mother. I mean,

0:10:56.360 --> 0:10:58.920
<v Speaker 1>this woman looks like she's one hundred years old, completely

0:10:59.000 --> 0:11:03.680
<v Speaker 1>hunched over, surrounded by cops. Is an extremely unfavorable image

0:11:03.679 --> 0:11:06.320
<v Speaker 1>for the police. And see Hong again actually managed to

0:11:06.320 --> 0:11:08.760
<v Speaker 1>get hold of these surveillance photos. Then he posted the

0:11:08.800 --> 0:11:11.280
<v Speaker 1>images of his mother's interrogation online as well.

0:11:11.520 --> 0:11:15.480
<v Speaker 2>This is very who watches the watchman irl? You know,

0:11:15.520 --> 0:11:18.760
<v Speaker 2>he's using the Chinese authority's own tools essentially against them.

0:11:18.920 --> 0:11:21.480
<v Speaker 1>That's he's actually right. And Seahong himself was quoted in

0:11:21.520 --> 0:11:25.400
<v Speaker 1>the story saying, the party installs surveillance cameras to watch us.

0:11:25.840 --> 0:11:28.320
<v Speaker 1>I thought I could use the same method to watch them, you.

0:11:28.320 --> 0:11:30.800
<v Speaker 2>Know, I think we think of huge tech systems as

0:11:30.840 --> 0:11:34.200
<v Speaker 2>fully autonomous, but a story like this really reveals how

0:11:34.240 --> 0:11:37.720
<v Speaker 2>a single human being can still have an outsized effect.

0:11:38.240 --> 0:11:41.960
<v Speaker 2>And you know, what this activist did was essentially reveal

0:11:42.080 --> 0:11:45.200
<v Speaker 2>that there is no such thing as a fully autonomous system.

0:11:45.240 --> 0:11:47.560
<v Speaker 2>And I think the footage of the police arriving in

0:11:47.600 --> 0:11:50.680
<v Speaker 2>the empty apartment and displaying this very sort of human

0:11:50.800 --> 0:11:54.679
<v Speaker 2>confusion as a testament to that which humans being inside

0:11:54.720 --> 0:11:57.120
<v Speaker 2>the lubnol brings me to the big story that I

0:11:57.120 --> 0:11:59.160
<v Speaker 2>want to bring to you this week, and it's do

0:11:59.200 --> 0:12:01.960
<v Speaker 2>you know about the people who train AI models to

0:12:02.000 --> 0:12:02.440
<v Speaker 2>be better?

0:12:02.679 --> 0:12:05.600
<v Speaker 1>I actually do, because I have a friend who I

0:12:05.640 --> 0:12:07.760
<v Speaker 1>actually asked if they would come on the show some

0:12:07.800 --> 0:12:10.679
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago, and they said no because they have NDAs

0:12:10.800 --> 0:12:13.800
<v Speaker 1>and they rely on their AI trainer work for part

0:12:13.800 --> 0:12:16.160
<v Speaker 1>of their income, so they couldn't do it. So now

0:12:16.200 --> 0:12:18.360
<v Speaker 1>you brought this story because I've wanted to know more

0:12:18.360 --> 0:12:19.240
<v Speaker 1>about it for some time.

0:12:19.480 --> 0:12:22.320
<v Speaker 2>So that's exactly what this Business Insider article is about.

0:12:22.440 --> 0:12:26.120
<v Speaker 2>They spoke to over sixty people who are basically the

0:12:26.240 --> 0:12:29.800
<v Speaker 2>humans behind the AI boom. They're called data labelers, and

0:12:30.240 --> 0:12:32.920
<v Speaker 2>there are hundreds of thousands of them around the world.

0:12:32.960 --> 0:12:35.160
<v Speaker 2>You'll remember, you know, we used to talk on Sleepwalkers

0:12:35.200 --> 0:12:39.400
<v Speaker 2>about content moderation, which was a sort of similarly arduous,

0:12:39.800 --> 0:12:43.920
<v Speaker 2>sometimes disturbing task. These people do exactly what your friend does,

0:12:43.960 --> 0:12:47.679
<v Speaker 2>which is that they spend hours and hours feeding chatbots

0:12:47.760 --> 0:12:52.040
<v Speaker 2>test prompts, and then categorizing their responses according to whether

0:12:52.080 --> 0:12:57.760
<v Speaker 2>they're helpful, accurate, concise, natural sounding, or wrong, rambling, robotic,

0:12:57.960 --> 0:13:03.000
<v Speaker 2>and sometimes even offensive. In the Business Insider article, they

0:13:03.040 --> 0:13:08.080
<v Speaker 2>are described as quote part speech pathologists, part manners tutors,

0:13:08.120 --> 0:13:09.959
<v Speaker 2>and part debate coaches.

0:13:09.800 --> 0:13:11.520
<v Speaker 1>That teachers in an elite prep school.

0:13:13.040 --> 0:13:13.559
<v Speaker 2>Exactly.

0:13:14.280 --> 0:13:17.280
<v Speaker 1>I never asked my friend because I thought it was indelicate,

0:13:17.320 --> 0:13:20.280
<v Speaker 1>But I'm curious what kind of money do these people make.

0:13:20.480 --> 0:13:24.320
<v Speaker 2>So one of the companies that oversees these trainers is

0:13:24.360 --> 0:13:28.200
<v Speaker 2>called Outlier, and they actually said that they've collectively paid

0:13:28.440 --> 0:13:31.319
<v Speaker 2>and this is a quote, hundreds of millions of dollars

0:13:31.320 --> 0:13:34.280
<v Speaker 2>in the past year alone for data labelers. One of

0:13:34.320 --> 0:13:37.880
<v Speaker 2>the labelers quoted in the article actually made fifty thousand

0:13:37.960 --> 0:13:40.400
<v Speaker 2>dollars in six months at one point, which is a

0:13:40.440 --> 0:13:41.480
<v Speaker 2>decent amount of money.

0:13:41.679 --> 0:13:44.360
<v Speaker 1>Ten thousand dollars a month almost it's not bad. I

0:13:44.400 --> 0:13:47.160
<v Speaker 1>mean how much data labeling do you have to do

0:13:47.240 --> 0:13:49.120
<v Speaker 1>to make fifty thousand dollars and six months.

0:13:49.200 --> 0:13:50.920
<v Speaker 2>Well, when I say this, it might not sound like

0:13:51.000 --> 0:13:52.840
<v Speaker 2>so much more, but it's a full time job, so

0:13:52.880 --> 0:13:55.040
<v Speaker 2>you're working about fifty hours a week. But you know,

0:13:55.080 --> 0:13:57.360
<v Speaker 2>one of the difficult parts about this work is that

0:13:57.400 --> 0:13:59.440
<v Speaker 2>the rates can change on a whim. You know, at

0:13:59.480 --> 0:14:03.520
<v Speaker 2>one point outlier, this company change one contractor's rate from

0:14:03.760 --> 0:14:06.200
<v Speaker 2>fifty an hour to fifteen dollars an hour with absolutely

0:14:06.240 --> 0:14:10.160
<v Speaker 2>no explanation. Also, like a lot of seemingly steady streams

0:14:10.160 --> 0:14:13.160
<v Speaker 2>of work can dry up with absolutely no explanation. And

0:14:13.240 --> 0:14:16.400
<v Speaker 2>so one person was basically like, my job is like gambling.

0:14:16.640 --> 0:14:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, because one of those types of work where it's finite, right, Like,

0:14:20.200 --> 0:14:22.440
<v Speaker 1>once you've trained the thing, you don't need to train

0:14:22.480 --> 0:14:24.920
<v Speaker 1>it anymore. And so there's this kind of inherent issue

0:14:24.960 --> 0:14:27.840
<v Speaker 1>at the heart of this story where real humans are

0:14:27.960 --> 0:14:31.720
<v Speaker 1>essentially accelerating putting themselves out of work by doing this

0:14:31.880 --> 0:14:32.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of work.

0:14:32.720 --> 0:14:35.400
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely. One of the things that I actually found striking

0:14:35.880 --> 0:14:38.160
<v Speaker 2>is that the article says that a lot of times

0:14:38.240 --> 0:14:42.120
<v Speaker 2>training chatbots to work better means actually doing things like

0:14:42.160 --> 0:14:46.360
<v Speaker 2>treating them worse or testing how they handle potentially harmful prompts,

0:14:46.680 --> 0:14:49.360
<v Speaker 2>and actually, in some cases, the more the humans can

0:14:49.400 --> 0:14:52.360
<v Speaker 2>get a bot to say something inappropriate, the more they

0:14:52.400 --> 0:14:55.000
<v Speaker 2>get paid. So one of these data labelers in the

0:14:55.120 --> 0:14:58.360
<v Speaker 2>article said she got tasks like, quote, make the bot

0:14:58.440 --> 0:15:01.720
<v Speaker 2>suggest murder, how the bot tell you, how to overpower

0:15:01.760 --> 0:15:04.440
<v Speaker 2>a woman to rape her, make the bot tell you

0:15:04.560 --> 0:15:05.480
<v Speaker 2>incest is okay.

0:15:07.760 --> 0:15:09.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I love doing the show with you, but

0:15:09.680 --> 0:15:12.600
<v Speaker 1>when we get to these moments, I'm like, damn as

0:15:12.680 --> 0:15:16.800
<v Speaker 1>just so depressing. The story reminds me of jimber something

0:15:16.840 --> 0:15:18.480
<v Speaker 1>called Amazon's M Turk.

0:15:18.840 --> 0:15:21.760
<v Speaker 2>Yes, we reported on it for Sleepwalkers, I remember, but

0:15:22.200 --> 0:15:23.280
<v Speaker 2>remind me. I'm vague.

0:15:23.600 --> 0:15:28.320
<v Speaker 1>So M Turk is actually a reference to an eighteenth

0:15:28.360 --> 0:15:33.840
<v Speaker 1>century fake chess playing automaton called the Mechanical Turk. The

0:15:33.880 --> 0:15:37.720
<v Speaker 1>Mechanical Turk traveled around the European royal courts. It beat

0:15:37.960 --> 0:15:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Benjamin Franklin at chess, but of course it turned out

0:15:40.720 --> 0:15:43.160
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't actually a chess playing robot. It was a

0:15:43.240 --> 0:15:47.200
<v Speaker 1>very elaborate machine that a human was stuck in the

0:15:47.240 --> 0:15:50.240
<v Speaker 1>bottom of and was somehow able to see what the

0:15:50.280 --> 0:15:53.160
<v Speaker 1>opponent was doing, and was also themselves a very good

0:15:53.200 --> 0:15:56.120
<v Speaker 1>chess player, so it's a little stranger. Amazon chose to

0:15:56.280 --> 0:16:00.840
<v Speaker 1>name em Turk after this eighteenth century hopes that also

0:16:01.120 --> 0:16:04.800
<v Speaker 1>disguised the fundamental human labor that powered it. How it

0:16:04.840 --> 0:16:07.720
<v Speaker 1>all began was in the early two thousands when Amazon

0:16:07.760 --> 0:16:09.800
<v Speaker 1>started selling more than just books, and they had to

0:16:09.840 --> 0:16:12.200
<v Speaker 1>figure out how to categorize a whole bunch of new products,

0:16:12.400 --> 0:16:14.680
<v Speaker 1>and they had tens of thousands of duplicate products showing

0:16:14.720 --> 0:16:16.240
<v Speaker 1>up on their site they had to get rid of.

0:16:16.560 --> 0:16:19.080
<v Speaker 1>None of the software they tried could actually solve for this,

0:16:19.720 --> 0:16:22.960
<v Speaker 1>so even though the task was fairly simple, it required

0:16:23.160 --> 0:16:25.960
<v Speaker 1>human intelligence. Of course, they didn't want to hire a

0:16:25.960 --> 0:16:28.280
<v Speaker 1>whole bunch of people to do this. Instead, they created

0:16:28.280 --> 0:16:31.760
<v Speaker 1>an outsource system called MTurk, where people, for a few

0:16:31.800 --> 0:16:35.080
<v Speaker 1>cents at a time, could do these one click type assignments,

0:16:35.320 --> 0:16:37.080
<v Speaker 1>and in fact, it worked so well they made it

0:16:37.120 --> 0:16:40.560
<v Speaker 1>publicly available for other companies to post work. And then,

0:16:40.600 --> 0:16:43.320
<v Speaker 1>of course the machines were able to train on what

0:16:43.400 --> 0:16:46.600
<v Speaker 1>the human m Turks were doing and make their labor

0:16:46.680 --> 0:16:47.840
<v Speaker 1>less and less necessary.

0:16:48.120 --> 0:16:51.040
<v Speaker 2>Meanwhile, the tech companies reaping the rewards of all that

0:16:51.120 --> 0:16:54.560
<v Speaker 2>labor are making a ton of money. Obviously, Amazon is

0:16:54.600 --> 0:16:57.560
<v Speaker 2>Amazon but outlier. The company that a lot of these

0:16:57.640 --> 0:17:01.000
<v Speaker 2>data labelers work for is owned by skills Ai, which

0:17:01.400 --> 0:17:04.320
<v Speaker 2>we shouldn't forget, sold a forty nine percent steak to

0:17:04.359 --> 0:17:07.480
<v Speaker 2>Meta in June for fourteen point three billion dollars.

0:17:07.720 --> 0:17:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Must be making some margin. I find there's something almost

0:17:12.680 --> 0:17:16.280
<v Speaker 1>operatic in the level of tragedy about training machines to

0:17:16.320 --> 0:17:19.439
<v Speaker 1>replace us faster. That said, after the break, we do

0:17:19.520 --> 0:17:22.639
<v Speaker 1>have some more optimistic news. Anthropic agrees to pay the

0:17:22.760 --> 0:17:26.280
<v Speaker 1>human authors it plagiarized, and Apple brings us one step

0:17:26.320 --> 0:17:32.000
<v Speaker 1>closer to the Sci Fi dream of instant simultaneous language translation.

0:17:32.480 --> 0:17:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Then on chatting me, can chat GPT replace your therapist?

0:17:37.040 --> 0:17:39.280
<v Speaker 1>And does your therapist actually want it?

0:17:39.320 --> 0:17:54.679
<v Speaker 4>To stay with us?

0:17:57.560 --> 0:17:59.760
<v Speaker 1>We're back and we've got a few more headlines for you.

0:17:59.800 --> 0:18:03.160
<v Speaker 2>This and then a story about a therapist who used

0:18:03.200 --> 0:18:05.320
<v Speaker 2>chat GPT as his therapist.

0:18:05.560 --> 0:18:08.679
<v Speaker 1>But first, Kara, All the biggest names in Silicon Valley

0:18:08.760 --> 0:18:10.600
<v Speaker 1>were at the White House last week. Some of the

0:18:10.640 --> 0:18:14.760
<v Speaker 1>dinner guests included Metas, Mark Zuckerberg, Bill Gates, Sam Altman,

0:18:15.320 --> 0:18:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft sat In Adela, Google CEO, Sundha Pischai, and Tim

0:18:19.920 --> 0:18:21.359
<v Speaker 1>Cook or Tim Apple if.

0:18:21.280 --> 0:18:23.800
<v Speaker 2>You prefer it's very important to me that we only

0:18:23.840 --> 0:18:24.720
<v Speaker 2>call him Tim Apple.

0:18:25.920 --> 0:18:28.320
<v Speaker 1>And earlier in the day before the dinner, there'd been

0:18:28.359 --> 0:18:33.160
<v Speaker 1>an event for the administration's new Artificial Intelligence Task Force,

0:18:33.440 --> 0:18:37.560
<v Speaker 1>spearheaded by First Lady Malania Trump, during which she warned

0:18:37.560 --> 0:18:38.600
<v Speaker 1>the following.

0:18:38.440 --> 0:18:43.439
<v Speaker 3>The robots are here. Our future is no longer science fiction.

0:18:44.119 --> 0:18:46.960
<v Speaker 2>It sounds like the robots are here. So what happened

0:18:46.960 --> 0:18:48.920
<v Speaker 2>at the dinner? Did anything interesting happen? Well?

0:18:48.960 --> 0:18:52.080
<v Speaker 1>As you might expect, everyone was lining up to seeing

0:18:52.160 --> 0:18:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Trump's praises. At one point, Tim Cook told Trump, thank

0:18:56.040 --> 0:18:58.600
<v Speaker 1>you about eight times in the space of two minutes.

0:18:59.160 --> 0:19:02.240
<v Speaker 2>Didn't you just give it a solid gold bar recently?

0:19:02.880 --> 0:19:06.239
<v Speaker 1>He did? He did so, but he didn't say it's

0:19:06.240 --> 0:19:11.640
<v Speaker 1>a pleasure eight times. You know, my grandmother always used

0:19:11.640 --> 0:19:14.000
<v Speaker 1>to say to me, you can never lay it on

0:19:14.080 --> 0:19:14.640
<v Speaker 1>too thick.

0:19:14.960 --> 0:19:15.639
<v Speaker 2>She's not wrong.

0:19:16.000 --> 0:19:19.160
<v Speaker 1>And then all the tech guys took a turn announcing

0:19:19.320 --> 0:19:23.159
<v Speaker 1>how they planned to support the administration's AI initiatives, and

0:19:23.280 --> 0:19:25.439
<v Speaker 1>the dilla of Microsoft said they're going to give all

0:19:25.600 --> 0:19:29.000
<v Speaker 1>US college students free use of Copilot AI and would

0:19:29.040 --> 0:19:31.920
<v Speaker 1>eventually expand that program to middle and high school students

0:19:32.000 --> 0:19:34.800
<v Speaker 1>as part of a four billion dollar investment they're making

0:19:34.840 --> 0:19:37.680
<v Speaker 1>in AI education over the next five years. Sam Altman

0:19:37.680 --> 0:19:41.359
<v Speaker 1>announced an Open AI jobs platform and certificate program and

0:19:41.440 --> 0:19:44.840
<v Speaker 1>said Open Ai plans on training ten million Americans in

0:19:44.920 --> 0:19:48.040
<v Speaker 1>AI by twenty thirty. So darpach I promised one billion

0:19:48.080 --> 0:19:50.720
<v Speaker 1>dollars in AI powered education in the next three years,

0:19:50.720 --> 0:19:53.639
<v Speaker 1>coming from Google. And then there was this kind of

0:19:53.680 --> 0:19:57.480
<v Speaker 1>awkward moment where Trump asked Mark Zuckerberg how much he's

0:19:57.520 --> 0:19:58.760
<v Speaker 1>planning to invest in AI.

0:19:59.119 --> 0:20:01.240
<v Speaker 5>How much you used for then, would you say over

0:20:01.280 --> 0:20:04.400
<v Speaker 5>the next few years, Oh gosh, I mean I think

0:20:04.400 --> 0:20:07.800
<v Speaker 5>it's probably going to be something like, I don't know,

0:20:07.840 --> 0:20:12.679
<v Speaker 5>at least six hundred billion dollars through twenty eight in

0:20:12.720 --> 0:20:16.879
<v Speaker 5>the US. Yeah, no, it's not it's significant.

0:20:17.640 --> 0:20:18.280
<v Speaker 1>That's a lot.

0:20:18.520 --> 0:20:19.920
<v Speaker 3>Thank you, Mark, it's great to have you.

0:20:20.359 --> 0:20:23.920
<v Speaker 1>But there was another hot mic moment this week.

0:20:24.760 --> 0:20:27.160
<v Speaker 3>Sorry, it wasn't ready to do right now.

0:20:30.080 --> 0:20:32.919
<v Speaker 1>In case you couldn't totally hear that. That's Mark Zuckerberg

0:20:33.040 --> 0:20:35.840
<v Speaker 1>referring to his previous comment about the six hundred billion dollars,

0:20:36.000 --> 0:20:39.359
<v Speaker 1>but also telling Trump quote, I didn't know what number

0:20:39.560 --> 0:20:40.800
<v Speaker 1>you wanted me to go with.

0:20:41.000 --> 0:20:43.280
<v Speaker 2>And the President is telling Mark Zuckerberg how much to

0:20:43.320 --> 0:20:46.000
<v Speaker 2>spend on AI because why, well.

0:20:45.840 --> 0:20:48.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure he's really telling him how much to spend.

0:20:48.480 --> 0:20:51.000
<v Speaker 1>He's telling him how much to say he's going to spend,

0:20:51.240 --> 0:20:55.280
<v Speaker 1>which is I think a big difference. But clearly, you know,

0:20:55.440 --> 0:20:59.399
<v Speaker 1>Trump is making it apparent to the tech CEOs and

0:20:59.480 --> 0:21:02.560
<v Speaker 1>the media and anybody who cares to watch, that these

0:21:02.600 --> 0:21:04.680
<v Speaker 1>guys are dancing to his tune, which I just think

0:21:04.760 --> 0:21:06.399
<v Speaker 1>is interesting. One of the things that strikes me is

0:21:06.560 --> 0:21:09.159
<v Speaker 1>what will happen when Trump is no longer president. This

0:21:09.200 --> 0:21:12.320
<v Speaker 1>is in new politics in terms of how American business operates,

0:21:12.440 --> 0:21:15.439
<v Speaker 1>or will this be an aberration? We don't know. What

0:21:15.480 --> 0:21:18.040
<v Speaker 1>we do know is that Elon wasn't there. He was not,

0:21:18.359 --> 0:21:21.399
<v Speaker 1>but he tweeted that he had been invited. He just

0:21:21.480 --> 0:21:26.240
<v Speaker 1>wasn't able to make it. Methinks that Grock doth protest

0:21:26.280 --> 0:21:27.800
<v Speaker 1>too much. But let's see.

0:21:28.400 --> 0:21:31.200
<v Speaker 2>Staying with the topic of tech companies spending big money

0:21:31.200 --> 0:21:33.600
<v Speaker 2>to stay out of trouble, did you see this anthropic thing.

0:21:33.600 --> 0:21:35.000
<v Speaker 1>A little bit? But tell me more so.

0:21:35.400 --> 0:21:39.160
<v Speaker 2>Nthropic is shelling out the largest payout in the history

0:21:39.200 --> 0:21:43.040
<v Speaker 2>of US copyright law, which is one point five billion

0:21:43.119 --> 0:21:46.800
<v Speaker 2>dollars to writers like authors whose books were used to

0:21:46.840 --> 0:21:50.879
<v Speaker 2>train Anthropics' AI chatbot Claude.

0:21:50.359 --> 0:21:52.640
<v Speaker 1>I saw this number and I was intrigued to know

0:21:53.280 --> 0:21:56.199
<v Speaker 1>how that related to the total amount of cash that

0:21:56.320 --> 0:22:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Anthropic has raised from investors. They've raised about thirty million dollars,

0:22:00.600 --> 0:22:03.040
<v Speaker 1>so one point five billion dollars is five percent of

0:22:03.119 --> 0:22:05.760
<v Speaker 1>the total cash they've raised, which I think is non trivial.

0:22:06.000 --> 0:22:07.639
<v Speaker 1>What does it mean for the authors though? I mean

0:22:07.680 --> 0:22:09.920
<v Speaker 1>it's like any two cents from Spotify once a quarter,

0:22:10.080 --> 0:22:12.000
<v Speaker 1>or it is something more significant.

0:22:12.320 --> 0:22:16.320
<v Speaker 2>There are about five hundred thousand authors receiving payments, and

0:22:16.720 --> 0:22:20.680
<v Speaker 2>they're each getting paid three thousand dollars per stolen work,

0:22:20.720 --> 0:22:24.320
<v Speaker 2>which it's not pennies in the mail, but it's also

0:22:24.400 --> 0:22:28.160
<v Speaker 2>not much of a compensation for a year or many

0:22:28.240 --> 0:22:30.160
<v Speaker 2>years plus that it takes to write a book.

0:22:30.359 --> 0:22:32.119
<v Speaker 1>What does all do this mean for? I mean, you're

0:22:32.200 --> 0:22:34.800
<v Speaker 1>somebody who wears many hats, one of which is working

0:22:34.800 --> 0:22:36.879
<v Speaker 1>a lot with authors and in the publishing world. What

0:22:36.920 --> 0:22:38.320
<v Speaker 1>does this mean to you? And what does it mean

0:22:38.359 --> 0:22:40.320
<v Speaker 1>for the bigger context at AI and copyright?

0:22:40.520 --> 0:22:43.800
<v Speaker 2>So right now there's actually over forty copyright lawsuits against

0:22:43.800 --> 0:22:47.239
<v Speaker 2>AI companies across the country, and experts are saying that

0:22:47.280 --> 0:22:49.800
<v Speaker 2>this could pave the way for courts to make tech

0:22:49.800 --> 0:22:53.200
<v Speaker 2>companies pay up via settlement or maybe even licensing fees.

0:22:53.359 --> 0:22:55.440
<v Speaker 2>The New York Times actually quoted to Chile as a

0:22:55.520 --> 0:22:59.440
<v Speaker 2>needy who's an intellectual property lawyer turned AI company executive,

0:22:59.480 --> 0:23:03.560
<v Speaker 2>and she this quote the AI industry's Napster moment.

0:23:03.960 --> 0:23:08.440
<v Speaker 1>That's interesting. I mean, the Napster moment was when, basically,

0:23:08.840 --> 0:23:11.600
<v Speaker 1>I think the record labels stood Napster and stop Napster

0:23:11.680 --> 0:23:15.080
<v Speaker 1>from pirating all of their music. However, what came after

0:23:15.200 --> 0:23:19.399
<v Speaker 1>Napster was music streaming services like Spotify, which ultimately had

0:23:19.400 --> 0:23:22.080
<v Speaker 1>the same effect for the vast majority of artists of

0:23:22.160 --> 0:23:26.359
<v Speaker 1>dramatically reducing their compensation for their work. So I don't know.

0:23:26.400 --> 0:23:29.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if the Napster comparison is very comforting

0:23:29.560 --> 0:23:30.040
<v Speaker 1>if you're an.

0:23:29.920 --> 0:23:33.440
<v Speaker 2>Author, Yeah, I'm not sure. I mean, I think authors

0:23:33.960 --> 0:23:37.920
<v Speaker 2>have such a hard time already creating a decent lifestyle.

0:23:37.960 --> 0:23:40.520
<v Speaker 2>I don't think this is going to be a harbinger

0:23:40.560 --> 0:23:41.840
<v Speaker 2>of big payouts to come.

0:23:42.240 --> 0:23:44.520
<v Speaker 1>So I got one last headline for you, But first

0:23:44.560 --> 0:23:47.840
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask are you a trekkie and or

0:23:48.040 --> 0:23:50.280
<v Speaker 1>have you read The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy.

0:23:50.560 --> 0:23:53.840
<v Speaker 2>I was a tracky. I have not read Hitchhiker's Guide.

0:23:53.520 --> 0:23:58.920
<v Speaker 1>In Star Trek, do you remember the Universal Translator?

0:23:59.160 --> 0:24:01.159
<v Speaker 2>I do, Actually I had a toy of it.

0:24:01.320 --> 0:24:02.960
<v Speaker 1>That's incredible. Why do I mean, did you ask for

0:24:02.960 --> 0:24:03.520
<v Speaker 1>that toy? Why do you?

0:24:03.520 --> 0:24:03.720
<v Speaker 3>Guys?

0:24:03.760 --> 0:24:03.879
<v Speaker 4>Yes?

0:24:03.960 --> 0:24:05.560
<v Speaker 2>Of course I was a huge track you when I

0:24:05.600 --> 0:24:06.040
<v Speaker 2>was a kid.

0:24:06.160 --> 0:24:08.359
<v Speaker 1>So I mean in Star Trek it solves for the

0:24:08.400 --> 0:24:12.760
<v Speaker 1>problem of interplanetary communication. In a Hitchhiker's Guide, there's something

0:24:12.760 --> 0:24:14.960
<v Speaker 1>called the Babelfish, which you'll put in your ear and

0:24:15.119 --> 0:24:18.359
<v Speaker 1>also facilitates into species translation.

0:24:18.680 --> 0:24:22.000
<v Speaker 2>So which one? Which one are you about to tell

0:24:22.040 --> 0:24:22.399
<v Speaker 2>me about?

0:24:22.520 --> 0:24:24.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm about to tell you about the new AirPods. The

0:24:24.960 --> 0:24:28.080
<v Speaker 1>new AirPods will be able to do live translation via

0:24:28.119 --> 0:24:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Apple Intelligence. So basically, if I'm wearing AirPods Pro three

0:24:32.000 --> 0:24:34.840
<v Speaker 1>and you're wearing AirPods Pro three, I could talk to

0:24:34.920 --> 0:24:38.800
<v Speaker 1>you like this and you could hear it in French

0:24:38.880 --> 0:24:41.199
<v Speaker 1>if you spoke French and respond in French, and then

0:24:41.200 --> 0:24:42.879
<v Speaker 1>I would hear it back in English. I mean, this

0:24:43.040 --> 0:24:45.520
<v Speaker 1>is truly. I remember when I was studying languages in

0:24:45.560 --> 0:24:49.680
<v Speaker 1>college that all the language teachers had this incredible reverence

0:24:49.800 --> 0:24:53.679
<v Speaker 1>for simultaneous interpreters. Like the people who work at the

0:24:53.760 --> 0:24:56.919
<v Speaker 1>un who are literally in real time translating. It's not

0:24:56.960 --> 0:24:58.760
<v Speaker 1>just words. You have to understand the sentiment. You have

0:24:58.800 --> 0:25:00.760
<v Speaker 1>to understand what's an idiot makes, et cetera. And this

0:25:00.880 --> 0:25:04.320
<v Speaker 1>was like the holy grail of being a linguist was

0:25:04.359 --> 0:25:07.399
<v Speaker 1>simultaneous translation and now and we'll have to see how

0:25:07.400 --> 0:25:09.800
<v Speaker 1>the product actually works outside of the demos. We're not

0:25:09.840 --> 0:25:12.879
<v Speaker 1>that green. But the idea that this my actor, I mean,

0:25:12.920 --> 0:25:15.160
<v Speaker 1>this is this is science fiction becoming science fact.

0:25:15.280 --> 0:25:17.000
<v Speaker 2>The thing that I kept thinking about was there was

0:25:17.040 --> 0:25:20.320
<v Speaker 2>a Seinfeld where Elaine is very caught up with what

0:25:20.480 --> 0:25:22.960
<v Speaker 2>her nail tech at the nail salon is saying about

0:25:23.000 --> 0:25:25.720
<v Speaker 2>her during I think a pedicure or manicure, and it

0:25:25.880 --> 0:25:28.480
<v Speaker 2>just there was a really funny tweet about this that

0:25:28.560 --> 0:25:43.719
<v Speaker 2>like the nail salon is about to change.

0:25:43.760 --> 0:25:46.040
<v Speaker 1>And now it's time for our final segment of the day,

0:25:46.400 --> 0:25:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Chat and Me, where we discuss how people are really

0:25:50.160 --> 0:25:53.960
<v Speaker 1>using chatbots and dear listeners, we want to hear from you.

0:25:54.040 --> 0:25:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Please send your story Start Inbox Tech Stuff Podcasts at

0:25:57.119 --> 0:25:59.879
<v Speaker 1>gmail dot com. You may notice we have a new

0:26:00.600 --> 0:26:03.440
<v Speaker 1>some new show art, which means that we'll be very

0:26:03.440 --> 0:26:05.960
<v Speaker 1>happy to print it on T shirts for anyone who

0:26:05.960 --> 0:26:06.600
<v Speaker 1>writes in.

0:26:06.680 --> 0:26:09.560
<v Speaker 2>This week, we reached out to doctor Harvey Lieberman. He's

0:26:09.560 --> 0:26:12.000
<v Speaker 2>a psychologist who recently wrote an essay in The New

0:26:12.040 --> 0:26:15.960
<v Speaker 2>York Times called I'm a Therapist. CHATGBT is eerily effective

0:26:16.359 --> 0:26:18.200
<v Speaker 2>And we actually liked the article so much that we've

0:26:18.200 --> 0:26:19.840
<v Speaker 2>reached out to him to see if he wanted to

0:26:19.880 --> 0:26:21.119
<v Speaker 2>submit something for chatting me.

0:26:21.440 --> 0:26:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Now I'm guessing since we're talking about it, he did.

0:26:24.119 --> 0:26:26.520
<v Speaker 2>He absolutely did. I'm actually going to start with letting

0:26:26.600 --> 0:26:30.240
<v Speaker 2>him share what he found useful about CHATGBT as a therapist.

0:26:30.600 --> 0:26:32.920
<v Speaker 2>He said that for this experiment, he talked to chat

0:26:33.000 --> 0:26:35.760
<v Speaker 2>GBT for a year. So here's what he found.

0:26:35.920 --> 0:26:39.040
<v Speaker 3>I was surprised how often it helped me get the

0:26:39.040 --> 0:26:42.480
<v Speaker 3>thoughts I hadn't quite put into words. At its best,

0:26:42.600 --> 0:26:44.879
<v Speaker 3>it felt like a steady part on that what I

0:26:44.960 --> 0:26:49.919
<v Speaker 3>call a cognitive prosthesis, not thinking for me, but helping

0:26:49.920 --> 0:26:53.040
<v Speaker 3>me organize and extend my own thinking, the way a

0:26:53.119 --> 0:26:55.520
<v Speaker 3>walking stick supports you as you walk.

0:26:56.320 --> 0:26:58.200
<v Speaker 2>And even though he said it was a great support,

0:26:58.880 --> 0:27:00.679
<v Speaker 2>you've got to be careful, of course, with how you

0:27:00.760 --> 0:27:03.280
<v Speaker 2>use it. You can't just take what chat tells you

0:27:03.320 --> 0:27:04.920
<v Speaker 2>at face value, it's.

0:27:04.760 --> 0:27:07.800
<v Speaker 3>Not magic, though. To get real benefit you have to

0:27:07.880 --> 0:27:12.359
<v Speaker 3>put an effort check its accuracy, set limits, and sometimes

0:27:12.400 --> 0:27:17.440
<v Speaker 3>get guidance. Used casually, it can lead. For me, the

0:27:17.560 --> 0:27:21.320
<v Speaker 3>experience was orten therapeutic, but it's not a replacement for

0:27:21.400 --> 0:27:22.159
<v Speaker 3>a therapist.

0:27:23.040 --> 0:27:26.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, I like about doctor Liberman other than his voice,

0:27:26.480 --> 0:27:28.760
<v Speaker 1>He's not burying his head in the sand. The reality

0:27:28.920 --> 0:27:33.639
<v Speaker 1>is so many people are using chat as either their

0:27:33.760 --> 0:27:36.680
<v Speaker 1>therapist or as an addition to their therapist. And rather

0:27:36.680 --> 0:27:39.440
<v Speaker 1>than just saying that's bad, you shouldn't do it, doctor

0:27:39.480 --> 0:27:42.639
<v Speaker 1>Leberman actually tried it out on himself. I think that

0:27:42.720 --> 0:27:44.840
<v Speaker 1>is a high watermark, honestly for what it means to

0:27:44.840 --> 0:27:46.680
<v Speaker 1>be a good doctor. That said, I'm curious if you

0:27:46.720 --> 0:27:50.119
<v Speaker 1>had nothing to say about AI induced psychosis.

0:27:50.359 --> 0:27:52.200
<v Speaker 2>You know, he actually did, and he said, there's one

0:27:52.200 --> 0:27:55.200
<v Speaker 2>thing people should be especially mindful of when using chat

0:27:55.200 --> 0:27:55.880
<v Speaker 2>in this way.

0:27:56.040 --> 0:27:59.480
<v Speaker 3>People who are vulnerable or in serious distress need a

0:27:59.520 --> 0:28:02.239
<v Speaker 3>trust to human in the loop to make sure this

0:28:02.359 --> 0:28:05.720
<v Speaker 3>kind of tool is you safely. One quortion is that

0:28:05.760 --> 0:28:08.720
<v Speaker 3>some people start to feel as if the machine is

0:28:08.760 --> 0:28:12.959
<v Speaker 3>a real relationship. It isn't. The important thing is for

0:28:13.040 --> 0:28:17.480
<v Speaker 3>AI to support human being and connection not replace.

0:28:17.080 --> 0:28:19.760
<v Speaker 2>It, and he even gave listeners some tips for how

0:28:19.800 --> 0:28:23.600
<v Speaker 2>to give chat prompts that will actually generate helpful responses

0:28:23.640 --> 0:28:25.480
<v Speaker 2>when it comes to supporting your mental health.

0:28:25.840 --> 0:28:30.080
<v Speaker 3>One practical tip don't just ask random questions. Tell it

0:28:30.119 --> 0:28:34.040
<v Speaker 3>who you are, what you're working on, even share examples

0:28:34.040 --> 0:28:37.400
<v Speaker 3>of your writing or projects. The more context you give,

0:28:37.920 --> 0:28:41.000
<v Speaker 3>the more helpful and reflective the answers will be more

0:28:41.080 --> 0:28:44.200
<v Speaker 3>like rethink a colleague than using a search engine.

0:28:44.440 --> 0:28:46.480
<v Speaker 1>You know. I like this take from doctor Leeberman. This

0:28:46.600 --> 0:28:49.240
<v Speaker 1>is a measured, reasonable take on where chat can be

0:28:49.320 --> 0:28:52.240
<v Speaker 1>very helpful and where it came. And I think the

0:28:52.280 --> 0:28:55.520
<v Speaker 1>bottom line is that he mentions if you're in crisis,

0:28:55.640 --> 0:28:58.120
<v Speaker 1>then obviously you need a real professional.

0:28:58.320 --> 0:29:00.280
<v Speaker 2>I think when you're good at what you do, you

0:29:00.280 --> 0:29:03.920
<v Speaker 2>can recognize that something isn't necessarily coming for your job,

0:29:04.440 --> 0:29:06.880
<v Speaker 2>but can enhance your job in a meaningful way. And

0:29:06.920 --> 0:29:11.160
<v Speaker 2>I think he's a person who clearly understands the power

0:29:11.160 --> 0:29:13.600
<v Speaker 2>of something that is ubiquitous and that is going to

0:29:13.680 --> 0:29:38.320
<v Speaker 2>change the nature of his profession. That's it for this

0:29:38.360 --> 0:29:40.320
<v Speaker 2>week for Tech Stuff. I'm Kara Price and.

0:29:40.280 --> 0:29:43.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm os Vloschan. This episode was produced by Eliza Dennis

0:29:43.280 --> 0:29:47.240
<v Speaker 1>Tyler Hill, Melissa Slaughter, and Julian Nutter. Is executive produced

0:29:47.240 --> 0:29:50.600
<v Speaker 1>by me Kara Price and Kate Osborne for Kaleidoscope and

0:29:50.680 --> 0:29:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Katrina Novel for iHeart Podcasts. Also a big shout out

0:29:54.080 --> 0:29:56.840
<v Speaker 1>to Katrina for helping us get this new show art

0:29:56.920 --> 0:30:00.360
<v Speaker 1>into the world. The engineer is Bihid Fraser le Murdoch

0:30:00.440 --> 0:30:02.600
<v Speaker 1>makes this episode and wrote our theme song.

0:30:02.960 --> 0:30:05.760
<v Speaker 2>Join us next Wednesday protect Uff the Story, when we

0:30:05.800 --> 0:30:08.640
<v Speaker 2>will share an in depth conversation with Carter Sherman about

0:30:08.680 --> 0:30:10.680
<v Speaker 2>technologies role in the sex recession.

0:30:11.000 --> 0:30:13.880
<v Speaker 1>And please do rate and review the show on Spotify,

0:30:14.320 --> 0:30:17.320
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts, wherever you listen, and write to us

0:30:17.400 --> 0:30:19.280
<v Speaker 1>either with a chat and me or with any feedback

0:30:19.320 --> 0:30:22.200
<v Speaker 1>you have at tech stuff podcast at gmail dot com.