WEBVTT - Midterms Ain’t Midterming! | MiniPod

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Native lamb Pod is the production of iHeartRadio in partnership

0:00:03.240 --> 0:00:05.000
<v Speaker 1>with Reason Choice Media.

0:00:05.120 --> 0:00:08.360
<v Speaker 2>Well come, well come, well come, well come, well come, welcome.

0:00:09.720 --> 0:00:11.240
<v Speaker 3>Okay, welcome home everybody.

0:00:11.280 --> 0:00:15.080
<v Speaker 4>This is a Native Lamppod Mini pod and Today. Because

0:00:15.120 --> 0:00:17.239
<v Speaker 4>sometimes we tend to be in gloom and doom, We're

0:00:17.280 --> 0:00:20.200
<v Speaker 4>just gonna stay in the doom, So we at the

0:00:20.360 --> 0:00:23.600
<v Speaker 4>end of most shows tell you how many days are

0:00:23.680 --> 0:00:26.200
<v Speaker 4>left to the midterms. Now, Andrew might be feeling like,

0:00:26.280 --> 0:00:30.880
<v Speaker 4>woo hoo midterms. I think me and Tiff really might

0:00:30.920 --> 0:00:33.440
<v Speaker 4>feel a way about telling y'all how many days are

0:00:33.520 --> 0:00:35.840
<v Speaker 4>left to the midterms, because I don't really know these

0:00:35.880 --> 0:00:39.040
<v Speaker 4>things gonna damn happen, So tif, I think that might be.

0:00:39.440 --> 0:00:40.400
<v Speaker 3>Where you're resting.

0:00:41.440 --> 0:00:44.040
<v Speaker 4>Even if they are gonna happen, are they gonna cheat

0:00:44.080 --> 0:00:46.320
<v Speaker 4>like they did? I still feel like they did in

0:00:46.479 --> 0:00:49.239
<v Speaker 4>the twenty twenty four election. I don't have dad. I

0:00:49.280 --> 0:00:51.440
<v Speaker 4>got a gut feeling. I'm telling about the black women

0:00:51.479 --> 0:00:54.480
<v Speaker 4>in the Holy Goes We'll be spot on. So I'm

0:00:54.520 --> 0:00:58.040
<v Speaker 4>curious to know if you guys think we should still

0:00:58.040 --> 0:00:59.680
<v Speaker 4>be telling people how many days are left.

0:01:02.280 --> 0:01:05.080
<v Speaker 1>I say that I think it's pointless. I get so

0:01:05.240 --> 0:01:08.039
<v Speaker 1>frustrated when people say, Andrew already disagree with me. But

0:01:08.400 --> 0:01:10.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm just gonna tell you, Andrew, I think it is

0:01:10.600 --> 0:01:14.520
<v Speaker 1>pointless when people start talking to me like we just

0:01:14.520 --> 0:01:16.760
<v Speaker 1>gotta hold on for one more year then the midterms.

0:01:16.800 --> 0:01:19.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm hold on to what? What do we think the

0:01:19.200 --> 0:01:22.600
<v Speaker 1>midterms are going to change? And after going out and

0:01:22.600 --> 0:01:25.080
<v Speaker 1>telling everybody gotta vote, gotta votetta vote, gotta vote, and

0:01:25.240 --> 0:01:28.200
<v Speaker 1>the country I know Angela believes the election is stolen.

0:01:28.280 --> 0:01:32.160
<v Speaker 1>I can only go on what is before us, and

0:01:32.280 --> 0:01:34.640
<v Speaker 1>that is that millions of people cast ballots for this.

0:01:34.880 --> 0:01:38.680
<v Speaker 1>But I will say, Angela, the Latasha has been the

0:01:38.720 --> 0:01:42.880
<v Speaker 1>most compelling to me in giving me actual facts that

0:01:43.000 --> 0:01:45.920
<v Speaker 1>suggest the election is stolen. And I've really I'm hesitant

0:01:45.959 --> 0:01:47.880
<v Speaker 1>to share what she said. So y'all give me a

0:01:47.880 --> 0:01:49.560
<v Speaker 1>little bit of grace because I could be saying it

0:01:49.880 --> 0:01:53.280
<v Speaker 1>incorrectly because I don't know the exact jurisdictions. But she

0:01:53.480 --> 0:01:57.080
<v Speaker 1>was saying there were places where people would vote down

0:01:57.200 --> 0:02:02.800
<v Speaker 1>ballot completely Democrat and not the top Republican and it

0:02:02.920 --> 0:02:06.480
<v Speaker 1>happened overwhelmingly, and we should have her come on so

0:02:06.480 --> 0:02:09.280
<v Speaker 1>she can say it directly. But when she said that,

0:02:09.320 --> 0:02:11.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm like now, that is information to me, that is

0:02:11.880 --> 0:02:15.960
<v Speaker 1>that's factual, it's logical, and it gives you a head

0:02:15.960 --> 0:02:19.960
<v Speaker 1>scratch where yes, that does require, you know, some investigation.

0:02:20.280 --> 0:02:22.840
<v Speaker 1>But even if they did, okay, it is here now,

0:02:22.960 --> 0:02:25.040
<v Speaker 1>like what they're not gonna say, okay, takes these back seats.

0:02:25.080 --> 0:02:29.040
<v Speaker 1>We stole it, like they have already instituted this authoritarian regime.

0:02:29.280 --> 0:02:32.400
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know any post industrialized country that has

0:02:32.400 --> 0:02:36.839
<v Speaker 1>come this far into authoritarianism and turned around. So why

0:02:36.919 --> 0:02:39.000
<v Speaker 1>we think all of a sudden we're gonna have free

0:02:39.000 --> 0:02:41.280
<v Speaker 1>and fair elections in this country for midterms, which we've

0:02:41.280 --> 0:02:43.679
<v Speaker 1>never really had, as black folks know all too well,

0:02:43.720 --> 0:02:45.600
<v Speaker 1>and as women know all too well, we've never really

0:02:45.639 --> 0:02:48.680
<v Speaker 1>had that. But we think somehow in four hundred and

0:02:48.919 --> 0:02:53.360
<v Speaker 1>eighty days that we're going to have a better chance

0:02:53.400 --> 0:02:55.600
<v Speaker 1>at democracy. I just don't think so. But find Andrew,

0:02:55.600 --> 0:02:58.320
<v Speaker 1>you've been shaking your head, So go ahead and tell

0:02:58.360 --> 0:02:59.160
<v Speaker 1>me how I'm wrong.

0:02:59.320 --> 0:03:02.240
<v Speaker 2>I think, so long as elections are still determining who

0:03:02.280 --> 0:03:05.119
<v Speaker 2>is going to be running the country, serving as your mayor,

0:03:05.120 --> 0:03:07.680
<v Speaker 2>on your school board, and your members of Congress, you

0:03:07.680 --> 0:03:10.280
<v Speaker 2>need to participate. We need to show up, and we

0:03:10.320 --> 0:03:13.799
<v Speaker 2>have to participate in the process that exists that allows

0:03:13.840 --> 0:03:16.760
<v Speaker 2>for people to do exactly what they're doing right now

0:03:17.000 --> 0:03:21.760
<v Speaker 2>to us, against us, and some would even say against

0:03:21.760 --> 0:03:24.400
<v Speaker 2>our will. It certainly was against mine. My will when

0:03:24.440 --> 0:03:26.760
<v Speaker 2>I voted, was for a different outcome, and it was

0:03:26.800 --> 0:03:29.959
<v Speaker 2>to preserve democracy. But the other choice was also pretty

0:03:29.960 --> 0:03:35.920
<v Speaker 2>clear to me, which was the opposite of holding democracy,

0:03:35.720 --> 0:03:41.680
<v Speaker 2>but quite frankly flipping closer to autocracy. I do think that.

0:03:41.960 --> 0:03:45.520
<v Speaker 2>So one thing on the evidence around the down ballot

0:03:45.600 --> 0:03:48.480
<v Speaker 2>versus up ballot. That's a trend that's happened in Florida

0:03:48.600 --> 0:03:54.440
<v Speaker 2>for decades. It's only recently shifted where people elected local

0:03:54.720 --> 0:03:58.320
<v Speaker 2>Democrats to school board, their mayors, their council in the

0:03:58.360 --> 0:04:03.520
<v Speaker 2>western part of Lord of the panhandular region. But Democratic

0:04:03.560 --> 0:04:09.000
<v Speaker 2>registration was really the majority registration across the Panhandle for

0:04:09.680 --> 0:04:14.600
<v Speaker 2>frankly all of our existence up to Governor Jeb Bush

0:04:14.680 --> 0:04:20.520
<v Speaker 2>being elected. But their national voting habits were always more conservative,

0:04:20.839 --> 0:04:24.240
<v Speaker 2>so they would vote for Republican presidents, Republican US senators,

0:04:24.480 --> 0:04:26.559
<v Speaker 2>and Democrats all the way down. The rest of the battle.

0:04:26.600 --> 0:04:30.039
<v Speaker 2>We described those folks as Dixiecrats, and Dixiecrats don't just

0:04:30.120 --> 0:04:33.480
<v Speaker 2>live in the panhandular region of Florida. Every part of

0:04:33.520 --> 0:04:36.080
<v Speaker 2>the country has those folks who registered Democrats. They are

0:04:36.120 --> 0:04:40.240
<v Speaker 2>not leaving their party registration, but their voting habits have shifted.

0:04:40.600 --> 0:04:43.560
<v Speaker 2>And then Donald Trump came along and created a permission

0:04:43.600 --> 0:04:46.560
<v Speaker 2>structure for those individuals to go from being registered ds

0:04:46.680 --> 0:04:50.760
<v Speaker 2>to now fully flown, grown, registered Ours, and then their

0:04:50.839 --> 0:04:54.839
<v Speaker 2>voting has now become consistent. They vote are at the

0:04:54.880 --> 0:04:57.200
<v Speaker 2>lower end and they vote are at the top end.

0:04:57.480 --> 0:04:59.599
<v Speaker 2>And I would imagine that that's a trend that exists

0:04:59.680 --> 0:05:04.560
<v Speaker 2>all over the country. But Latasha's point, if we're going

0:05:04.640 --> 0:05:08.080
<v Speaker 2>to find irregularities in the election system, it is going

0:05:08.120 --> 0:05:12.320
<v Speaker 2>to happen at a precinct by precinct level in each

0:05:12.400 --> 0:05:15.560
<v Speaker 2>county and every you know, and all over the country,

0:05:15.560 --> 0:05:20.360
<v Speaker 2>but both very specifically in states that are considered basically

0:05:20.400 --> 0:05:24.520
<v Speaker 2>beil weather states or states that could flip either Republican

0:05:24.600 --> 0:05:28.160
<v Speaker 2>or Democrat from cycle to cycle. But the ability for

0:05:28.200 --> 0:05:32.520
<v Speaker 2>someone to hold sales steal an election by flipping a switch,

0:05:34.000 --> 0:05:37.559
<v Speaker 2>and if impacted the entire country, it is less likely

0:05:37.600 --> 0:05:40.680
<v Speaker 2>given the decentralized nature of our election system, which is

0:05:40.760 --> 0:05:44.479
<v Speaker 2>run county to county to county, and I mean not

0:05:44.640 --> 0:05:48.159
<v Speaker 2>in but just make this final point, which is simply say,

0:05:48.279 --> 0:05:50.760
<v Speaker 2>I think we have to be really careful and responsible

0:05:50.800 --> 0:05:55.360
<v Speaker 2>with how we talk about our elections systems, because it's

0:05:55.360 --> 0:05:59.479
<v Speaker 2>the only thing that people can have faith in if

0:05:59.480 --> 0:06:03.239
<v Speaker 2>they're exercizing the process of going out of their house

0:06:03.560 --> 0:06:05.799
<v Speaker 2>down to a precinct or in their house in filling

0:06:05.880 --> 0:06:09.560
<v Speaker 2>out an absentee ballot and letting their voices be heard.

0:06:09.560 --> 0:06:13.360
<v Speaker 2>Because I don't know too many people who willingly participate

0:06:13.440 --> 0:06:18.040
<v Speaker 2>in what they find to be a futile experience. Most people,

0:06:18.120 --> 0:06:21.120
<v Speaker 2>if I'm going to take my time, energy effort, in

0:06:21.120 --> 0:06:24.039
<v Speaker 2>some cases money to fuel a gas tank or otherwise,

0:06:25.920 --> 0:06:29.600
<v Speaker 2>it better have an outcome on the other end of it,

0:06:30.040 --> 0:06:33.400
<v Speaker 2>hopefully in the direction that I would like it to go,

0:06:34.040 --> 0:06:37.240
<v Speaker 2>but an outcome nonetheless that can be trusted. And if

0:06:37.279 --> 0:06:40.680
<v Speaker 2>we erode that process, we think we have problems now

0:06:40.720 --> 0:06:44.000
<v Speaker 2>with the couch winning quote unquote, we're really going to

0:06:44.040 --> 0:06:47.720
<v Speaker 2>exacerbate a problem of people deciding to just check completely

0:06:47.760 --> 0:06:50.560
<v Speaker 2>a wholesale out of elections because they don't believe that

0:06:50.600 --> 0:06:53.040
<v Speaker 2>they're legal, that they're fair, or that it will count.

0:06:53.279 --> 0:06:56.680
<v Speaker 2>Let alone the debate around whether it matters because of

0:06:57.080 --> 0:06:59.960
<v Speaker 2>what happens once people get elected, but whether it will count.

0:07:00.440 --> 0:07:03.360
<v Speaker 2>And I think that create that that crisis of confidence

0:07:03.400 --> 0:07:07.239
<v Speaker 2>and a system opens up a whole new barrel for

0:07:07.440 --> 0:07:08.200
<v Speaker 2>us to have to fight.

0:07:08.960 --> 0:07:12.160
<v Speaker 1>I think that's all completely fair. I just want to

0:07:12.160 --> 0:07:15.320
<v Speaker 1>punctuate the point that you made around being careful how

0:07:15.360 --> 0:07:17.760
<v Speaker 1>we talk about it. Something that you said that is

0:07:18.640 --> 0:07:21.600
<v Speaker 1>in real time made me reconsider about midterms is when

0:07:21.600 --> 0:07:24.560
<v Speaker 1>we talk about those down ballot races, when in your

0:07:24.600 --> 0:07:29.480
<v Speaker 1>explanation of Dixiecrats, yes, those down ballot races may not

0:07:29.640 --> 0:07:33.280
<v Speaker 1>be impacted by impropriety. You know, this is like school

0:07:33.280 --> 0:07:35.960
<v Speaker 1>board elections, city council members. So at no point am

0:07:36.000 --> 0:07:39.240
<v Speaker 1>I ever discouraging people from participating in the process. I'm

0:07:39.280 --> 0:07:42.400
<v Speaker 1>really speaking more from a federal perspective. I don't know

0:07:42.440 --> 0:07:48.000
<v Speaker 1>what midterm elections might change. Even should Democrats take seize

0:07:48.040 --> 0:07:51.240
<v Speaker 1>power of the House and or the Senate. I'd be

0:07:51.280 --> 0:07:54.400
<v Speaker 1>curious about what things that have happened that that could

0:07:54.440 --> 0:07:57.480
<v Speaker 1>actually stop. I think there's a big tent in the party.

0:07:57.520 --> 0:08:00.440
<v Speaker 1>There are conservative Democrats. So that's really my perspect in

0:08:00.520 --> 0:08:05.520
<v Speaker 1>terms of your explanation on malfeasance in the past election,

0:08:06.000 --> 0:08:07.960
<v Speaker 1>I just want to be clear there too, I am

0:08:08.000 --> 0:08:11.280
<v Speaker 1>not saying the election was stolen. I'm not saying it wasn't.

0:08:11.280 --> 0:08:15.120
<v Speaker 1>My only thing is before the responsibility for me personally,

0:08:15.160 --> 0:08:18.440
<v Speaker 1>the responsibility I have before an audience. I would not

0:08:18.640 --> 0:08:21.800
<v Speaker 1>say the election is stolen if I have not well

0:08:21.920 --> 0:08:25.200
<v Speaker 1>researched it and said, here is the data chain that

0:08:25.320 --> 0:08:28.200
<v Speaker 1>leads me to that. So I'm simply sharing what Latasha

0:08:28.360 --> 0:08:31.080
<v Speaker 1>said to me, which is why, Yeah, I know, I

0:08:31.120 --> 0:08:32.679
<v Speaker 1>just want to be clear for the audience, because I

0:08:32.880 --> 0:08:35.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, I want them to understand this is what

0:08:35.200 --> 0:08:39.199
<v Speaker 1>I'm told. I have not personally gone down that rabbit

0:08:39.240 --> 0:08:41.600
<v Speaker 1>hole to say, oh, yeah, I see how this can happen.

0:08:41.880 --> 0:08:44.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious when you say stuff like county by county,

0:08:44.400 --> 0:08:46.080
<v Speaker 1>because you're not the only person to say that. I

0:08:46.080 --> 0:08:47.840
<v Speaker 1>think Roland Martin did a segment on his shows that

0:08:47.880 --> 0:08:51.160
<v Speaker 1>I haven't watched that I should, and Roland Martin is

0:08:51.200 --> 0:08:53.520
<v Speaker 1>in a stude journalist, so I don't know what he did.

0:08:53.600 --> 0:08:55.720
<v Speaker 1>But a lot of people were saying, oh, Roland Martin

0:08:55.720 --> 0:08:58.160
<v Speaker 1>explored a report by somebody that gave them pause on

0:08:58.200 --> 0:09:01.040
<v Speaker 1>the election. Those are the things that will entice me

0:09:01.120 --> 0:09:03.239
<v Speaker 1>to say, okay, well, let me look at the information.

0:09:03.960 --> 0:09:07.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if the election was stolen. I just

0:09:07.080 --> 0:09:09.959
<v Speaker 1>think that some of us, maybe not you, Angela, but

0:09:10.000 --> 0:09:12.560
<v Speaker 1>there are some people out there who are so traumatized

0:09:13.000 --> 0:09:17.120
<v Speaker 1>at the pronouncement of white supremacy in this country that

0:09:17.200 --> 0:09:19.440
<v Speaker 1>we can't even fathom it. That were like, there is

0:09:19.520 --> 0:09:22.320
<v Speaker 1>no way y'all went out and put this half witted

0:09:22.440 --> 0:09:26.680
<v Speaker 1>political idiot back in office after he said every racist,

0:09:26.800 --> 0:09:29.680
<v Speaker 1>awful thing. There is no chance that you all could

0:09:29.679 --> 0:09:31.760
<v Speaker 1>have done that, And that is where I'm torn. I'd

0:09:31.800 --> 0:09:34.760
<v Speaker 1>rather the election be stolen than to know that the

0:09:34.800 --> 0:09:37.840
<v Speaker 1>majority of people in this country right felt this way.

0:09:38.000 --> 0:09:40.480
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know, And I want.

0:09:40.320 --> 0:09:42.640
<v Speaker 4>To back into this a little bit because I had

0:09:42.679 --> 0:09:45.200
<v Speaker 4>to think about, like I know that I did some

0:09:45.280 --> 0:09:48.360
<v Speaker 4>research on the other side of the election, and there

0:09:48.360 --> 0:09:51.200
<v Speaker 4>were definitely reports that were coming out from election experts

0:09:51.280 --> 0:09:54.559
<v Speaker 4>on why this is a very likely phenomenon. So I

0:09:54.640 --> 0:09:57.600
<v Speaker 4>went back and looked. There was a lot of discussion

0:09:57.640 --> 0:10:01.600
<v Speaker 4>around county level manipulations. When we talk about mid term elections,

0:10:01.800 --> 0:10:06.000
<v Speaker 4>we're talking about local state elections, and then of course

0:10:06.040 --> 0:10:08.440
<v Speaker 4>our members of Congress that are elected in those off

0:10:08.520 --> 0:10:12.280
<v Speaker 4>year elections, as well as House of Representatives and senators

0:10:12.280 --> 0:10:14.800
<v Speaker 4>in some instances, I think it's a third normally that

0:10:14.880 --> 0:10:19.120
<v Speaker 4>are up for election. There were five states that one

0:10:19.320 --> 0:10:22.599
<v Speaker 4>entity said needed investigation into whether or not there was

0:10:22.600 --> 0:10:25.960
<v Speaker 4>any count county level manipulation. Please look these up so

0:10:25.960 --> 0:10:29.360
<v Speaker 4>that you're not just going off my smart elections one

0:10:29.840 --> 0:10:32.400
<v Speaker 4>I'm about to I'm about to smart elections is one.

0:10:33.400 --> 0:10:38.960
<v Speaker 4>Election Truth Alliance looked at Clark County, Nevada. The drawing

0:10:39.120 --> 0:10:43.160
<v Speaker 4>off rate in Clark County, Nevada was astonishing to them.

0:10:43.400 --> 0:10:45.640
<v Speaker 4>The way that they would have they flipped from the

0:10:45.720 --> 0:10:51.080
<v Speaker 4>presidential nominee, the two presidential candidates to who they voted

0:10:51.080 --> 0:10:55.119
<v Speaker 4>for in the Senate was astonishing to Election Truth Alliance.

0:10:55.559 --> 0:10:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Additionally, for this as a quock question, when you say

0:10:58.920 --> 0:11:02.200
<v Speaker 1>the drop off, you're saying that people are voting basically

0:11:02.240 --> 0:11:04.360
<v Speaker 1>what Latasha was saying, that at the top they're voting

0:11:04.559 --> 0:11:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Republican and down ballot.

0:11:06.640 --> 0:11:13.479
<v Speaker 4>Ballant as Democrats. Yes, no, yes, even between the fads

0:11:13.480 --> 0:11:17.480
<v Speaker 4>even yes, yes, exactly. And then the other thing is,

0:11:17.559 --> 0:11:21.320
<v Speaker 4>and I forgot about this comment, but Donald Trump said

0:11:21.480 --> 0:11:26.520
<v Speaker 4>right after inauguration that Elon Musk understood the Pennsylvania voting

0:11:26.559 --> 0:11:29.719
<v Speaker 4>machines on a local level better than anyone and they

0:11:29.840 --> 0:11:32.760
<v Speaker 4>ended up winning by a landslide, which caused a lot

0:11:32.760 --> 0:11:36.200
<v Speaker 4>of alarm as well. So if you have someone saying

0:11:36.240 --> 0:11:38.959
<v Speaker 4>that there are five states or an entity that studies

0:11:38.960 --> 0:11:42.040
<v Speaker 4>this five states from an election integrity standpoint that need

0:11:42.080 --> 0:11:44.560
<v Speaker 4>to be looked into because it looks like there could

0:11:44.640 --> 0:11:47.959
<v Speaker 4>be some county by county manipulation. You have the President

0:11:48.040 --> 0:11:51.840
<v Speaker 4>making this pronouncement about Pennsylvania voting machines and Elon Musk,

0:11:51.880 --> 0:11:56.880
<v Speaker 4>and you have this Clark County analysis. And I remember

0:11:56.920 --> 0:11:59.080
<v Speaker 4>going back and looking at what the Attorney General put

0:11:59.080 --> 0:12:01.680
<v Speaker 4>out as well, Stephen horse Ford, to be fair, because

0:12:01.679 --> 0:12:04.360
<v Speaker 4>when I raised was Stephen Horsford, he was like, well.

0:12:04.320 --> 0:12:07.959
<v Speaker 1>The representative of Clark County, uh huh, Las Vegas.

0:12:08.240 --> 0:12:11.280
<v Speaker 4>And he said, well, they've been looking into this for

0:12:11.320 --> 0:12:13.880
<v Speaker 4>some time. It wasn't about this election, but it was

0:12:14.040 --> 0:12:14.880
<v Speaker 4>about this election.

0:12:15.280 --> 0:12:15.920
<v Speaker 3>So I'm not.

0:12:15.840 --> 0:12:18.520
<v Speaker 4>Sure what the dis like, what the issue was, And

0:12:18.559 --> 0:12:21.520
<v Speaker 4>I can't remember when how he responded to my response. Know,

0:12:21.559 --> 0:12:24.080
<v Speaker 4>they are talking about the twenty four election, not twenty two,

0:12:24.120 --> 0:12:27.800
<v Speaker 4>not twenty It was this year. But they did make

0:12:27.840 --> 0:12:30.840
<v Speaker 4>an analysis and have data from the year prior or,

0:12:30.880 --> 0:12:34.360
<v Speaker 4>the presidential prior and the one before that. And they

0:12:34.440 --> 0:12:37.600
<v Speaker 4>show how there was a more significant drop off like

0:12:37.640 --> 0:12:40.800
<v Speaker 4>ten percent from Harris to Jackie Rosen.

0:12:41.120 --> 0:12:41.680
<v Speaker 3>Two women.

0:12:41.840 --> 0:12:43.720
<v Speaker 4>So you also can't say, well, it was a woman thing.

0:12:44.000 --> 0:12:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Two women on the.

0:12:45.280 --> 0:12:49.080
<v Speaker 4>Versus YEP, versus what it was in twenty twenty versus

0:12:49.120 --> 0:12:49.920
<v Speaker 4>twenty sixteen.

0:12:51.840 --> 0:12:52.640
<v Speaker 1>Pennsylvania.

0:12:53.360 --> 0:12:56.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I need to go back, and Nevada was one.

0:12:57.080 --> 0:12:58.240
<v Speaker 3>Pennsylvania was one.

0:12:59.200 --> 0:13:01.520
<v Speaker 1>The interesting thing about those there are two swing states.

0:13:02.920 --> 0:13:05.560
<v Speaker 2>They were a Democrat, I would imagine then Michigan.

0:13:07.400 --> 0:13:09.120
<v Speaker 3>I don't want to even imagine you go back and

0:13:09.160 --> 0:13:09.400
<v Speaker 3>pull on.

0:13:11.640 --> 0:13:13.600
<v Speaker 2>But while you're looking that up, Ange, I'll just say

0:13:13.760 --> 0:13:15.800
<v Speaker 2>in Florida and my race for governor, we had the

0:13:15.880 --> 0:13:18.400
<v Speaker 2>US Senate race at the same time, which of course

0:13:18.440 --> 0:13:23.200
<v Speaker 2>had a white male nominee Democrat on my side, and

0:13:23.200 --> 0:13:27.360
<v Speaker 2>then my race obviously black male Democrat, and there was

0:13:27.400 --> 0:13:30.360
<v Speaker 2>about a point difference. And when I say a point,

0:13:30.400 --> 0:13:33.800
<v Speaker 2>I'm talking about like seventy thousand votes. Who were people

0:13:33.840 --> 0:13:36.360
<v Speaker 2>who were comfortable voting for a Democrat for the US Senate,

0:13:36.400 --> 0:13:39.560
<v Speaker 2>a white male Democrat for the US Senate, and who

0:13:39.640 --> 0:13:42.880
<v Speaker 2>then and the race for governor appeared to have switched

0:13:43.160 --> 0:13:49.400
<v Speaker 2>from their Democratic ballot to choose the Republican nominee. What

0:13:49.960 --> 0:13:53.439
<v Speaker 2>makes it alarming for outside groups who are looking at

0:13:53.440 --> 0:13:57.120
<v Speaker 2>these elections is if you see, usually these habits of

0:13:57.160 --> 0:13:59.760
<v Speaker 2>flipping or going back and forth between D and R

0:14:00.280 --> 0:14:03.440
<v Speaker 2>are sort of well laced. There's a history of it.

0:14:03.480 --> 0:14:05.080
<v Speaker 2>There's a way in which you can go back and

0:14:05.160 --> 0:14:09.240
<v Speaker 2>explain this to be a voting pattern of a particular area,

0:14:09.880 --> 0:14:11.880
<v Speaker 2>be it a whole state or congressional districts, so on

0:14:11.920 --> 0:14:15.480
<v Speaker 2>and so forth. What is anomalous is if there is

0:14:15.520 --> 0:14:20.520
<v Speaker 2>no history, yet you find a significant difference, especially at

0:14:20.560 --> 0:14:24.040
<v Speaker 2>same levels. Right, so you're talking about a statewide race.

0:14:24.520 --> 0:14:26.600
<v Speaker 2>A Senate is a statewide race. A governor is a

0:14:26.640 --> 0:14:30.040
<v Speaker 2>state wide race. So you're looking at two comparable races.

0:14:30.520 --> 0:14:33.360
<v Speaker 2>But then there is a difference between whether folks so

0:14:33.640 --> 0:14:35.920
<v Speaker 2>for a Democrat or a Republican in those seats and

0:14:36.080 --> 0:14:40.640
<v Speaker 2>most states, you can vote an entire Democratic line or

0:14:40.680 --> 0:14:43.040
<v Speaker 2>you can vote an entire Republican line, which means anyone

0:14:43.080 --> 0:14:46.239
<v Speaker 2>who is running for partisan office and they are a Republican,

0:14:46.360 --> 0:14:50.360
<v Speaker 2>your ballot will choose them, and the same for Democrat exactly.

0:14:51.120 --> 0:14:53.080
<v Speaker 2>And then there is there are the people who go

0:14:53.200 --> 0:14:55.920
<v Speaker 2>back and forth. Even when you have to make individual

0:14:56.040 --> 0:15:01.960
<v Speaker 2>selections back and forth. Overwhelmingly, people vote party line ballots.

0:15:02.320 --> 0:15:05.320
<v Speaker 2>That's where anomalies come from when folks don't do that.

0:15:05.360 --> 0:15:09.160
<v Speaker 2>And you see a difference between a statewide race where democrats,

0:15:09.520 --> 0:15:11.880
<v Speaker 2>the Democrat got four million votes and the Republican got

0:15:11.920 --> 0:15:15.240
<v Speaker 2>four point one million votes. But it then switches to

0:15:15.280 --> 0:15:18.600
<v Speaker 2>a governor's race and the Democrat gets three point nine

0:15:18.640 --> 0:15:22.360
<v Speaker 2>million and the Republican got four point two million. That

0:15:22.520 --> 0:15:25.880
<v Speaker 2>is a pretty significant difference without a trait. We have

0:15:25.920 --> 0:15:29.120
<v Speaker 2>to identify what the trait was that made the difference possible.

0:15:29.320 --> 0:15:33.120
<v Speaker 2>In twenty sixteen, this confounded a lot of us because

0:15:33.160 --> 0:15:35.440
<v Speaker 2>we had not seen the kind of drop off that

0:15:35.480 --> 0:15:40.120
<v Speaker 2>we'd seen before between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump and

0:15:40.240 --> 0:15:43.040
<v Speaker 2>the races that came below them, with folks choosing between

0:15:43.080 --> 0:15:46.920
<v Speaker 2>Democrat Republican. And what we found in later research is

0:15:46.960 --> 0:15:51.760
<v Speaker 2>that Trump was able to hyper activate the white vote turnout,

0:15:51.800 --> 0:15:53.480
<v Speaker 2>and he did the same in this last election.

0:15:53.560 --> 0:15:56.600
<v Speaker 1>In this last election, that is the thing.

0:15:56.560 --> 0:16:02.960
<v Speaker 2>Turnout of white voters about turn out totally skewed. It

0:16:02.560 --> 0:16:05.600
<v Speaker 2>threw all the polling off, of course, but it also

0:16:05.720 --> 0:16:08.760
<v Speaker 2>throws out a lot of these what do you call

0:16:08.800 --> 0:16:10.960
<v Speaker 2>those closing numbers at the end of the day they

0:16:10.960 --> 0:16:12.960
<v Speaker 2>say exit poled numbers and that kind of thing, which

0:16:12.960 --> 0:16:15.360
<v Speaker 2>because these people a lot of practice around exit polling,

0:16:15.640 --> 0:16:17.880
<v Speaker 2>and if they were, they're still not giving an honest answer,

0:16:18.280 --> 0:16:20.680
<v Speaker 2>and so it confounded a lot of us.

0:16:29.200 --> 0:16:30.960
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so just really quick.

0:16:31.000 --> 0:16:34.400
<v Speaker 4>So now I went to the Smart Elections thing and

0:16:34.440 --> 0:16:36.360
<v Speaker 4>they have a chart. I'm just going to send you

0:16:36.360 --> 0:16:40.960
<v Speaker 4>all the link. And they examined seventeen states, and the

0:16:41.000 --> 0:16:44.520
<v Speaker 4>swing states had the most significant drop off versus the

0:16:44.600 --> 0:16:45.920
<v Speaker 4>non swing states for reasons.

0:16:46.000 --> 0:16:47.920
<v Speaker 3>We understand there are swing states for a reason.

0:16:48.200 --> 0:16:54.680
<v Speaker 4>But the swing states were Arizona, Michigan, Nevada, North Carolina, Pennsylvania,

0:16:54.760 --> 0:16:57.760
<v Speaker 4>and Wisconsin. And then there are non swing states where

0:16:57.800 --> 0:17:00.240
<v Speaker 4>there was also drop off, but it was no where

0:17:00.280 --> 0:17:03.200
<v Speaker 4>near I mean it is. It is astonishing. So I'm

0:17:03.200 --> 0:17:04.720
<v Speaker 4>gonna send you guys to craft.

0:17:05.080 --> 0:17:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Send it to me. I remained unconvinced to be honest.

0:17:07.840 --> 0:17:11.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I and my challenge is when I'm citing

0:17:11.560 --> 0:17:14.480
<v Speaker 1>someone else's research, I want to know, like, how you

0:17:14.520 --> 0:17:16.280
<v Speaker 1>got this research. And then I got to talk to

0:17:16.359 --> 0:17:18.399
<v Speaker 1>five other people explain to me because this is what

0:17:18.400 --> 0:17:20.160
<v Speaker 1>they said they got how they got the research. Andrew,

0:17:20.200 --> 0:17:22.000
<v Speaker 1>you'd be one of those people like I don't read

0:17:22.000 --> 0:17:24.160
<v Speaker 1>cross tabs and feel all that stuff, Like I don't

0:17:24.200 --> 0:17:25.600
<v Speaker 1>know what I can look at the numbers, and I

0:17:25.600 --> 0:17:28.359
<v Speaker 1>remember I was at Michael Harriet's house when the new

0:17:28.000 --> 0:17:31.439
<v Speaker 1>Pew data drops and I was asking him to explain

0:17:31.480 --> 0:17:33.480
<v Speaker 1>it to me, and we talked about it in our chat.

0:17:33.520 --> 0:17:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Because even the idea, I know we disagree here, Angela,

0:17:35.640 --> 0:17:37.560
<v Speaker 1>but even the idea that the couch won, I don't

0:17:37.600 --> 0:17:39.760
<v Speaker 1>know that that's true, Like the data just does not

0:17:39.960 --> 0:17:42.920
<v Speaker 1>support it, but it's always my So then the couch

0:17:42.960 --> 0:17:45.920
<v Speaker 1>wins every year like that. When you said that that's

0:17:45.960 --> 0:17:50.280
<v Speaker 1>not that craasy number, that's the part that I actually,

0:17:50.359 --> 0:17:52.280
<v Speaker 1>I think it would be nice for us as a

0:17:52.320 --> 0:17:55.840
<v Speaker 1>country to get to a place where democracy was winning

0:17:56.040 --> 0:18:01.160
<v Speaker 1>enough that one candidate at least superseded that ninety million number. Yeah,

0:18:01.200 --> 0:18:04.240
<v Speaker 1>to me, that's that's I think, And specifically about this

0:18:04.359 --> 0:18:07.320
<v Speaker 1>idea that in this election it was so crazy because

0:18:07.400 --> 0:18:09.679
<v Speaker 1>ninety million people stayed home, and when you look at

0:18:09.760 --> 0:18:12.600
<v Speaker 1>over all the cycles, that is pretty consistent with how

0:18:12.600 --> 0:18:15.000
<v Speaker 1>many people stayed home. And then when you dig deeper

0:18:15.040 --> 0:18:18.119
<v Speaker 1>and you disaggregate this data, you go down each rabbit

0:18:18.160 --> 0:18:21.359
<v Speaker 1>hole individually, and that requires a collection of research, and

0:18:21.600 --> 0:18:23.919
<v Speaker 1>it's boring, right, It's like boring to sit there and

0:18:23.920 --> 0:18:25.919
<v Speaker 1>it takes hours and days to get to ask people.

0:18:26.160 --> 0:18:28.040
<v Speaker 1>But when you go across that and look at all

0:18:28.080 --> 0:18:31.320
<v Speaker 1>of it, and it'saggregated by race, this dude, the same

0:18:31.320 --> 0:18:34.840
<v Speaker 1>way that Obama brought out the highest number of black

0:18:34.920 --> 0:18:38.359
<v Speaker 1>voters and the lowest number of white voters, Donald Trump

0:18:38.680 --> 0:18:43.920
<v Speaker 1>ignited a movement among white people. And that is my challenge. Yes,

0:18:44.400 --> 0:18:47.080
<v Speaker 1>that is my challenge here because if that's what it

0:18:47.119 --> 0:18:50.520
<v Speaker 1>took for you all to participate in this here democracy,

0:18:50.920 --> 0:18:54.280
<v Speaker 1>and you were motivated. They were united in our destruction,

0:18:54.640 --> 0:18:59.520
<v Speaker 1>they are united in our failures in this country. They're

0:18:59.600 --> 0:19:01.800
<v Speaker 1>united and making sure that we never even get what

0:19:01.840 --> 0:19:04.280
<v Speaker 1>they have or come close. And they are so motivated

0:19:04.320 --> 0:19:06.360
<v Speaker 1>by that that they put this man back in office.

0:19:06.480 --> 0:19:09.159
<v Speaker 1>That is the part I have challenged, and I understand

0:19:09.200 --> 0:19:10.960
<v Speaker 1>why people are like, no, this can't be right, Like

0:19:11.000 --> 0:19:13.800
<v Speaker 1>this can't be true. I just have not seen all

0:19:13.840 --> 0:19:17.240
<v Speaker 1>the depth the New York Times analysis, Pew, all the

0:19:17.359 --> 0:19:20.080
<v Speaker 1>data I've looked at, nothing has supported a that the

0:19:20.119 --> 0:19:23.359
<v Speaker 1>couch has won, b that the election was stolen, even

0:19:23.359 --> 0:19:27.119
<v Speaker 1>in these swing states, that you're talking about. I remain open.

0:19:27.600 --> 0:19:30.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'm not saying this with certainty, but I

0:19:30.320 --> 0:19:35.439
<v Speaker 1>just feel some level of disgust that these people have

0:19:36.600 --> 0:19:40.399
<v Speaker 1>that they were motivated by him to come out. I

0:19:40.440 --> 0:19:42.440
<v Speaker 1>would love to hear that the election is stolen, because

0:19:42.480 --> 0:19:44.679
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, oh, these people, we have to cohabitate with

0:19:44.720 --> 0:19:46.920
<v Speaker 1>our fellow countrymen. They're actually not pieces of shit, and

0:19:46.920 --> 0:19:49.680
<v Speaker 1>they're actually not so bad. There's only a small number.

0:19:49.920 --> 0:19:50.000
<v Speaker 2>No.

0:19:50.240 --> 0:19:53.280
<v Speaker 1>What this election showed me is, yeah, ancient chains, they

0:19:53.280 --> 0:19:56.760
<v Speaker 1>are still awful people who voted for this man because

0:19:56.760 --> 0:19:58.760
<v Speaker 1>they don't like you and they don't like brown people.

0:19:59.240 --> 0:20:00.920
<v Speaker 1>That's I'm experiencing it.

0:20:01.800 --> 0:20:05.359
<v Speaker 2>I think we can if we talked about narcissism, it

0:20:05.359 --> 0:20:08.320
<v Speaker 2>would be a narcissist thing to say if we believe

0:20:08.359 --> 0:20:13.680
<v Speaker 2>that folks were motivated exclusively by why, Because I think

0:20:13.760 --> 0:20:19.080
<v Speaker 2>it's probably more complicated than simple. I think it can

0:20:19.160 --> 0:20:21.560
<v Speaker 2>be racist. Oh no, no, I'm not giving racist. I

0:20:21.600 --> 0:20:24.920
<v Speaker 2>think you can be racist, have racist belief in tendencies

0:20:25.000 --> 0:20:26.840
<v Speaker 2>ninety nine percent of your day in time or one

0:20:26.880 --> 0:20:28.879
<v Speaker 2>hundred percent of your day in time, and still have

0:20:28.920 --> 0:20:32.719
<v Speaker 2>other motivations for doing a thing beyond just being racist.

0:20:32.840 --> 0:20:35.320
<v Speaker 2>Is what I'm saying it doesn't make them better people.

0:20:35.840 --> 0:20:40.000
<v Speaker 2>It just means that they had motivations forgetting out and voting.

0:20:40.040 --> 0:20:42.760
<v Speaker 2>And by the way, a motivation had to be first

0:20:42.760 --> 0:20:47.040
<v Speaker 2>of all, when Barack Obama ran, these same white folks

0:20:47.040 --> 0:20:51.200
<v Speaker 2>could have been motivated equally like that Ma's Gillham that

0:20:51.200 --> 0:20:53.439
<v Speaker 2>that movie where at the end in California, like the

0:20:53.440 --> 0:20:56.280
<v Speaker 2>polls will be closing and whatever you know, Chris Rock

0:20:56.320 --> 0:20:58.840
<v Speaker 2>I think is the main character of that movie, and

0:20:59.080 --> 0:21:01.560
<v Speaker 2>they everybody's pulled out their driveway and rush into the

0:21:01.560 --> 0:21:03.680
<v Speaker 2>polls to go and vote to make sure the black

0:21:03.680 --> 0:21:06.080
<v Speaker 2>man didn't win. But just as they were motivated to

0:21:06.119 --> 0:21:08.880
<v Speaker 2>see Donald Trump, when they could have equally been motivated

0:21:08.880 --> 0:21:11.520
<v Speaker 2>to prevent a black man from winning the presidency. I mean,

0:21:12.520 --> 0:21:15.160
<v Speaker 2>in real time, they could have showed up in unprecedented

0:21:15.240 --> 0:21:18.479
<v Speaker 2>numbers to stop that from happening, and couldn't do it

0:21:18.520 --> 0:21:21.760
<v Speaker 2>every time, quite frankly up to now and probably beyond

0:21:21.800 --> 0:21:24.960
<v Speaker 2>for several election cycles, because that's just where the numbers

0:21:25.000 --> 0:21:28.800
<v Speaker 2>are when it comes to electoral performance. That if white

0:21:28.880 --> 0:21:31.960
<v Speaker 2>folks wanted to vote and vote the way they vote

0:21:32.040 --> 0:21:35.000
<v Speaker 2>right now, which is white men overwhelmingly Republican and white

0:21:35.040 --> 0:21:39.640
<v Speaker 2>women consistently over a majority Republican So if they could

0:21:39.680 --> 0:21:42.159
<v Speaker 2>have done that, then if this was only going to

0:21:42.200 --> 0:21:46.280
<v Speaker 2>be about race, but they didn't. But they didn't do that,

0:21:46.359 --> 0:21:49.080
<v Speaker 2>then they did not prevent that from happening. And they

0:21:49.080 --> 0:21:51.320
<v Speaker 2>could have, and they could have done it even with

0:21:51.400 --> 0:21:53.840
<v Speaker 2>fewer of them showing up than showed up to support Trump,

0:21:54.560 --> 0:21:57.000
<v Speaker 2>and in this case, they wanted Trump. And I will

0:21:57.119 --> 0:21:59.879
<v Speaker 2>just I'm layering on this that in addition to not

0:22:00.080 --> 0:22:05.399
<v Speaker 2>wanting a black woman there, it can also be that

0:22:05.440 --> 0:22:07.800
<v Speaker 2>there's some other things that were being communicated in that.

0:22:07.760 --> 0:22:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Missing voted against her or they voted for him either

0:22:13.200 --> 0:22:14.639
<v Speaker 1>and both make them racist.

0:22:14.640 --> 0:22:18.560
<v Speaker 2>Series it's a difference without distinction. Completely agree. All I'm

0:22:18.560 --> 0:22:21.919
<v Speaker 2>saying is is that if that were the only motivator

0:22:21.960 --> 0:22:25.920
<v Speaker 2>by itself, then why didn't that motivator also keep Barack

0:22:25.960 --> 0:22:27.120
<v Speaker 2>Obama from office?

0:22:27.640 --> 0:22:28.920
<v Speaker 1>They weren't engaged then, And.

0:22:31.200 --> 0:22:34.240
<v Speaker 4>Since that's not true, some of them, some of them

0:22:34.280 --> 0:22:38.080
<v Speaker 4>were voted, were voting to demonstrate they weren't racist. I'm looking,

0:22:38.160 --> 0:22:40.719
<v Speaker 4>I'm trying to see where I'm missing this too, but

0:22:40.760 --> 0:22:43.680
<v Speaker 4>is then looked up In twenty four ninety million people

0:22:43.760 --> 0:22:46.359
<v Speaker 4>didn't vote in twenty eighty million people didn't vote, and

0:22:46.359 --> 0:22:49.280
<v Speaker 4>so it was the highest turnout and voter participation since

0:22:49.359 --> 0:22:51.639
<v Speaker 4>nineteen o eight, and twenty four was the second highest

0:22:51.640 --> 0:22:55.520
<v Speaker 4>since nineteen sixty. In twenty sixteen, one hundred million people

0:22:55.560 --> 0:22:57.720
<v Speaker 4>didn't vote, and I'm trying to figure out what the

0:22:57.760 --> 0:23:01.000
<v Speaker 4>twenty twelve and two thousand and eight numbers are tour,

0:23:03.200 --> 0:23:05.760
<v Speaker 4>which is fine, but I don't remember it and sometimes

0:23:06.320 --> 0:23:07.320
<v Speaker 4>might not remember it either.

0:23:07.480 --> 0:23:10.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying that, I'm just saying I don't just

0:23:10.960 --> 0:23:13.640
<v Speaker 1>so people know I'm not googling something during the show,

0:23:14.000 --> 0:23:15.200
<v Speaker 1>because sometimes numbers are.

0:23:15.400 --> 0:23:17.840
<v Speaker 4>I am googling it during the show because I'm trying

0:23:17.840 --> 0:23:20.199
<v Speaker 4>to figure out where the breakdown is. I think what

0:23:20.280 --> 0:23:22.000
<v Speaker 4>I was trying to get to is at the end

0:23:22.000 --> 0:23:24.679
<v Speaker 4>of the day, what we know is voter participation is

0:23:24.720 --> 0:23:26.960
<v Speaker 4>not where it should be in this country, and as

0:23:27.000 --> 0:23:31.040
<v Speaker 4>a result, that means that democracy has consistently been failing

0:23:31.080 --> 0:23:34.040
<v Speaker 4>people because it doesn't feel like people power. So people

0:23:34.080 --> 0:23:36.640
<v Speaker 4>are not going to lean into a system where they

0:23:36.680 --> 0:23:39.679
<v Speaker 4>do not feel represented, which brings us full circle to

0:23:39.720 --> 0:23:41.600
<v Speaker 4>the point of this show. Because I know we are

0:23:41.600 --> 0:23:44.880
<v Speaker 4>supposed to be leaving like really soon and closing out

0:23:44.880 --> 0:23:45.440
<v Speaker 4>it really soon.

0:23:46.840 --> 0:23:48.160
<v Speaker 3>What we are struggling with.

0:23:48.240 --> 0:23:50.920
<v Speaker 4>I think all in all is telling people counting down

0:23:50.960 --> 0:23:55.240
<v Speaker 4>to the days where their circumstances are going to dramatically change,

0:23:55.440 --> 0:23:59.000
<v Speaker 4>counting down to the days where a midterm election means

0:23:59.320 --> 0:24:01.320
<v Speaker 4>that all of sudden, now things are going to be

0:24:01.359 --> 0:24:03.880
<v Speaker 4>sky as blue, things are great. That is not how

0:24:03.920 --> 0:24:07.120
<v Speaker 4>it's feeling, because even while we had a reprieve from

0:24:07.160 --> 0:24:11.160
<v Speaker 4>twenty sixteen to twenty twenty, things still haven't drastically changed

0:24:11.160 --> 0:24:13.560
<v Speaker 4>for a number of people in our communities. And so

0:24:13.680 --> 0:24:17.080
<v Speaker 4>while we count down, let us also be intentional about

0:24:17.119 --> 0:24:19.200
<v Speaker 4>the work that needs to shift that is in our

0:24:19.280 --> 0:24:23.040
<v Speaker 4>power to do, and be recruiting people that can dramatically

0:24:23.160 --> 0:24:27.160
<v Speaker 4>change circumstances because they are showing real courage. Whether it's

0:24:27.160 --> 0:24:29.800
<v Speaker 4>one hundred million or eighty million or ninety million, tip,

0:24:30.119 --> 0:24:32.840
<v Speaker 4>it is too many people who are sitting out of

0:24:32.920 --> 0:24:36.880
<v Speaker 4>participating in this democracy, and that means that the democracy

0:24:36.960 --> 0:24:39.719
<v Speaker 4>has to change. I think at the verities we can

0:24:39.760 --> 0:24:40.720
<v Speaker 4>all agree on that point.

0:24:41.000 --> 0:24:43.640
<v Speaker 1>I can definitely agree. Yeah, none of us ever disagree.

0:24:43.680 --> 0:24:46.040
<v Speaker 1>My only point was to present it like ninety million

0:24:46.080 --> 0:24:48.080
<v Speaker 1>people didn't vote this time, as though that was some

0:24:48.080 --> 0:24:53.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of anomalycessys crisis that's when I say crisis that

0:24:54.160 --> 0:24:58.240
<v Speaker 1>has happened over a lot of election cycles unfortunately in

0:24:58.280 --> 0:24:58.760
<v Speaker 1>the country.

0:24:58.880 --> 0:25:00.600
<v Speaker 2>And my question is with you to.

0:25:04.200 --> 0:25:08.120
<v Speaker 4>So, yeah, let's let's get let's fix that.

0:25:11.240 --> 0:25:15.199
<v Speaker 2>Find the idea of the couch one. It's good on

0:25:15.240 --> 0:25:19.000
<v Speaker 2>a shirt, but it doesn't have effectual impact in the

0:25:19.080 --> 0:25:21.800
<v Speaker 2>sense that when the couch wins, then the couch gets

0:25:21.800 --> 0:25:27.240
<v Speaker 2>to decide what happens. And in our democracy, the one

0:25:27.240 --> 0:25:30.520
<v Speaker 2>who actually wins gets to decide the policy. And so

0:25:30.640 --> 0:25:34.680
<v Speaker 2>when the couch starts laying people off and federal agencies

0:25:34.720 --> 0:25:38.720
<v Speaker 2>all throughout the land, then they won. But so long

0:25:38.760 --> 0:25:42.600
<v Speaker 2>as they're there. The in the sense that more people

0:25:42.720 --> 0:25:45.640
<v Speaker 2>sat the couch than got out and voted for any

0:25:45.680 --> 0:25:52.080
<v Speaker 2>one particular candidate, it is. It is a cool observation. However,

0:25:52.160 --> 0:25:56.520
<v Speaker 2>the effect of winning to me is you governed. Winning

0:25:56.560 --> 0:25:59.320
<v Speaker 2>means you're in charge. Winning means you get to do

0:25:59.400 --> 0:26:03.520
<v Speaker 2>the thing that you're inclined to do. And unfortunately the

0:26:03.560 --> 0:26:05.880
<v Speaker 2>couch didn't win because I don't think the couch would

0:26:05.880 --> 0:26:07.480
<v Speaker 2>have done what Donald Trump has been doing.

0:26:07.960 --> 0:26:08.480
<v Speaker 3>I think.

0:26:10.560 --> 0:26:15.080
<v Speaker 2>I think it should absorb as much time as we've

0:26:15.119 --> 0:26:18.040
<v Speaker 2>given the couches one, because it is semantical, and it

0:26:18.119 --> 0:26:22.400
<v Speaker 2>has created a debate that I think again ends up

0:26:23.400 --> 0:26:27.840
<v Speaker 2>talking about numbers rather than what is I think a greater, bigger, larger,

0:26:27.880 --> 0:26:31.359
<v Speaker 2>comprehensive point, and that is around a democracy and a

0:26:31.480 --> 0:26:36.679
<v Speaker 2>system of representative democracy that has failed so miserably that

0:26:36.720 --> 0:26:39.880
<v Speaker 2>the majority of people are choosing I will stay out

0:26:40.320 --> 0:26:43.040
<v Speaker 2>rather than have an impact on which one of these

0:26:43.040 --> 0:26:44.439
<v Speaker 2>fools end up serving.

0:26:45.560 --> 0:26:47.679
<v Speaker 1>This is a conversation. No, that's fine. This is a

0:26:47.720 --> 0:26:50.240
<v Speaker 1>conversation that I think will be ongoing because I don't

0:26:50.240 --> 0:26:53.000
<v Speaker 1>think we've resolved. Do we need to start telling people?

0:26:53.520 --> 0:26:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Do we need to continue to tell people how many

0:26:55.560 --> 0:26:57.880
<v Speaker 1>days until midterms? So I guess for now we'll keep

0:26:57.920 --> 0:27:00.760
<v Speaker 1>doing it. But what I love about this conversation I

0:27:00.760 --> 0:27:03.960
<v Speaker 1>have to be honest, all three of us feel very differently,

0:27:04.440 --> 0:27:08.159
<v Speaker 1>and I surmised that among our audience that there are

0:27:08.200 --> 0:27:11.320
<v Speaker 1>groups of each like. We each have followers who are like, yes,

0:27:11.480 --> 0:27:14.359
<v Speaker 1>what Angela is saying, Angela's right? Yes, what Ti He's saying? Yes,

0:27:14.440 --> 0:27:15.280
<v Speaker 1>what Andrew was saying?

0:27:15.720 --> 0:27:21.120
<v Speaker 2>Occasionally a good point, yes, even in your whole.

0:27:21.040 --> 0:27:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Like narcissism shade that you threw to me. I actually

0:27:24.359 --> 0:27:27.040
<v Speaker 1>take that point and think about it. I think about it.

0:27:28.200 --> 0:27:30.119
<v Speaker 2>I said it's narcissistic. Believe that.

0:27:30.920 --> 0:27:32.720
<v Speaker 1>I think that's agree.

0:27:33.520 --> 0:27:33.720
<v Speaker 2>All the.

0:27:35.600 --> 0:27:38.359
<v Speaker 4>Narcissists was thrown around a lot in the show before

0:27:38.520 --> 0:27:39.560
<v Speaker 4>in this show, and I.

0:27:39.640 --> 0:27:41.640
<v Speaker 2>Just want to because you got called it for yourself

0:27:43.119 --> 0:27:44.159
<v Speaker 2>asking about tips too.

0:27:44.200 --> 0:27:46.360
<v Speaker 4>I'm just saying, we like that should be the default,

0:27:46.440 --> 0:27:48.800
<v Speaker 4>Like y'all need to stop watching the social media videos,

0:27:48.880 --> 0:27:50.840
<v Speaker 4>like let me tell you how to find a narcissist,

0:27:50.960 --> 0:27:54.040
<v Speaker 4>like everything is it the way.

0:27:54.359 --> 0:27:56.640
<v Speaker 3>You're not actually believe it's actually.

0:27:59.000 --> 0:28:02.280
<v Speaker 1>But let us know it's it's over killed.

0:28:02.320 --> 0:28:04.040
<v Speaker 4>And I do think that we have to do the

0:28:04.119 --> 0:28:08.120
<v Speaker 4>hard work of unpacking again. We might have some flat side, Yeah,

0:28:09.800 --> 0:28:12.440
<v Speaker 4>trying to We're just trying to solve. Friends, We're just

0:28:12.480 --> 0:28:13.040
<v Speaker 4>trying to solve.

0:28:13.320 --> 0:28:14.640
<v Speaker 2>Don't take up space with me either.

0:28:16.000 --> 0:28:17.119
<v Speaker 1>We must hold space.

0:28:19.200 --> 0:28:20.639
<v Speaker 3>Have a boundary. You have a boundary.

0:28:21.280 --> 0:28:26.200
<v Speaker 1>We have the boundaries, all the therapy words. Okay with that,

0:28:26.920 --> 0:28:30.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm running. Y'all can keep going, but I'm kind I'm out.

0:28:31.359 --> 0:28:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Thank y'all for listening. There are we'll know how many

0:28:34.160 --> 0:28:36.119
<v Speaker 1>days the midterm alexis because we don't never don't have

0:28:36.160 --> 0:28:40.840
<v Speaker 1>to anyway. We will see y'all next time. Welcome home, y'all.

0:28:54.760 --> 0:28:57.680
<v Speaker 4>Native Lampard is a production of iHeart Radio and partnership

0:28:57.760 --> 0:28:58.960
<v Speaker 4>with Reason Choice Media.

0:28:59.280 --> 0:29:02.320
<v Speaker 3>For more podcas we ask for iHeartRadio visits, iHeartRadio app,

0:29:02.400 --> 0:29:05.400
<v Speaker 3>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.