WEBVTT - Hedging With ETFs Is Trickier Than It Looks

0:00:06.280 --> 0:00:10.399
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to trillions. I'm Joel Webber and I'm Eric bel Tunis.

0:00:10.920 --> 0:00:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Markets go up, and they've been going up for a

0:00:13.720 --> 0:00:16.120
<v Speaker 1>long time, but they also went down recently and then

0:00:16.120 --> 0:00:18.480
<v Speaker 1>they started going back up. Who knew? I knew. I

0:00:18.520 --> 0:00:21.200
<v Speaker 1>was sure they'd never go down. But looks like, yeah,

0:00:21.280 --> 0:00:23.200
<v Speaker 1>every once in a while I read books that they do.

0:00:23.239 --> 0:00:24.919
<v Speaker 1>But you know, now we know, and now you see

0:00:24.920 --> 0:00:27.760
<v Speaker 1>some red. Sometimes you also still see some green. But

0:00:28.040 --> 0:00:31.400
<v Speaker 1>what the red reminded people is that there isn't something

0:00:31.440 --> 0:00:34.400
<v Speaker 1>that you can do as an investor that can protect

0:00:34.440 --> 0:00:37.280
<v Speaker 1>you a little bit. Yeah, as an analyst in E

0:00:37.360 --> 0:00:39.200
<v Speaker 1>t F an else, I'm asked a lot by people

0:00:39.200 --> 0:00:41.680
<v Speaker 1>who just know me as the E t F guy. Hey,

0:00:41.720 --> 0:00:43.600
<v Speaker 1>how can I hedge the market? Or how can I

0:00:43.640 --> 0:00:45.919
<v Speaker 1>actually like put money in something that would go uphen

0:00:45.960 --> 0:00:48.320
<v Speaker 1>the market goes down. This is a popular question that

0:00:48.360 --> 0:00:50.720
<v Speaker 1>I got even before the drawdout. I get this question

0:00:50.800 --> 0:00:52.720
<v Speaker 1>quite a bit. So I recently wrote a primer on

0:00:52.720 --> 0:00:54.480
<v Speaker 1>how to hedge your portfolio with E t F s

0:00:54.480 --> 0:00:56.440
<v Speaker 1>and got a lot of reads. So what we're actually

0:00:56.480 --> 0:01:00.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna be spending this episode talking about is hedging. And

0:01:01.040 --> 0:01:04.560
<v Speaker 1>because Eric and I don't actually manage money or give

0:01:04.600 --> 0:01:07.319
<v Speaker 1>investment advice or give investment advice. We're bringing in someone

0:01:07.440 --> 0:01:12.120
<v Speaker 1>who can do both. Mike Venudo at Toroso Investments, where

0:01:12.160 --> 0:01:14.920
<v Speaker 1>he's the co founder and c I O, and he

0:01:14.920 --> 0:01:18.120
<v Speaker 1>knows this stuff backwards and forwards. And Mike just I've

0:01:18.160 --> 0:01:20.600
<v Speaker 1>met Mike several times on the circuit. As I like

0:01:20.680 --> 0:01:22.440
<v Speaker 1>to say, that's for Todd, Rose and Bluth and I

0:01:22.480 --> 0:01:24.600
<v Speaker 1>hang out. Mike is I thought that was the hot

0:01:24.640 --> 0:01:30.119
<v Speaker 1>tub that's come on. That was an awfor discussion. Mike

0:01:30.280 --> 0:01:32.320
<v Speaker 1>is what I considered to be an E t F

0:01:32.360 --> 0:01:35.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of Jedi master. He isn't all E t F

0:01:35.120 --> 0:01:38.960
<v Speaker 1>using advisor. There's people like this around that are so good.

0:01:38.959 --> 0:01:41.720
<v Speaker 1>They sniffed through the whole toolbox and so they're great

0:01:41.760 --> 0:01:43.840
<v Speaker 1>that I interview these people from my book and they

0:01:43.880 --> 0:01:45.880
<v Speaker 1>were very good because you could throw any ticker at

0:01:45.880 --> 0:01:47.840
<v Speaker 1>them and they have an opinion on it. But not

0:01:47.880 --> 0:01:49.480
<v Speaker 1>only that, they have an opinion on it because they

0:01:49.480 --> 0:01:50.920
<v Speaker 1>have money on the line. So there are really a

0:01:50.960 --> 0:01:53.279
<v Speaker 1>twofer in terms of commenting on this kind of stuff.

0:01:53.800 --> 0:01:55.480
<v Speaker 1>And to be clear, some of the stuff that we're

0:01:55.480 --> 0:01:57.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna talk about is going to be a little bit

0:01:57.240 --> 0:02:01.640
<v Speaker 1>more technical then most people might be accustomed to. But

0:02:01.680 --> 0:02:03.680
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna try and keep it really simple. And to

0:02:03.800 --> 0:02:06.440
<v Speaker 1>go back to that, you know, the Walmart superstore that

0:02:06.880 --> 0:02:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Eric's the manager of. Maybe maybe this is when you

0:02:09.480 --> 0:02:12.640
<v Speaker 1>when you get to the home depot on Saturday, instead

0:02:12.639 --> 0:02:15.640
<v Speaker 1>of getting the you know, the normal shopping cart, you

0:02:15.680 --> 0:02:18.200
<v Speaker 1>get the other kind that's a little bit more heavy duty,

0:02:18.280 --> 0:02:21.240
<v Speaker 1>the flat one with with still with the broken wheels

0:02:21.240 --> 0:02:25.560
<v Speaker 1>that go. But but this is the best version of

0:02:25.560 --> 0:02:28.080
<v Speaker 1>the broken wheel, so good for you on that. And

0:02:28.160 --> 0:02:29.960
<v Speaker 1>the other thing is, yes, this is and when you

0:02:29.960 --> 0:02:31.800
<v Speaker 1>talk about that aisle where you need that cart, normally

0:02:31.800 --> 0:02:33.079
<v Speaker 1>that's the place where you have to ask the guy

0:02:33.080 --> 0:02:35.240
<v Speaker 1>from Home Depot like what's up because you don't know

0:02:35.280 --> 0:02:37.600
<v Speaker 1>what you're doing. So I think that's a good metaphor

0:02:37.600 --> 0:02:40.440
<v Speaker 1>for this. And also not all of the ETFs we're

0:02:40.440 --> 0:02:42.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna go over today are are that hard to understand.

0:02:42.600 --> 0:02:44.840
<v Speaker 1>But the first ones will be where we decided to

0:02:44.840 --> 0:02:47.919
<v Speaker 1>start with the really hardcore exotic stuff that's been in

0:02:47.960 --> 0:02:50.000
<v Speaker 1>the news lately, and then we're gonna kind of like

0:02:50.440 --> 0:02:53.520
<v Speaker 1>slowly go to the more safe plane vanilla stuff that

0:02:53.720 --> 0:02:55.640
<v Speaker 1>most people using their portfolio. So keep in mind we're

0:02:55.680 --> 0:02:57.560
<v Speaker 1>going from like if this were a music store, We're

0:02:57.560 --> 0:02:59.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna start with n W A and then we'll end

0:02:59.520 --> 0:03:04.280
<v Speaker 1>with the parts family. On this episode of trial, how

0:03:04.320 --> 0:03:09.240
<v Speaker 1>to hedge a portfolio? Okay, Mike, how did you find

0:03:09.280 --> 0:03:11.480
<v Speaker 1>the E t F and what was that first trade? Like?

0:03:12.040 --> 0:03:14.240
<v Speaker 1>I found ets because I saw it as a disruption

0:03:14.360 --> 0:03:17.200
<v Speaker 1>to buying individual stocks, which is what we did at

0:03:17.240 --> 0:03:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Horizon Kinetics, where where I learned about investing. The first

0:03:21.480 --> 0:03:23.600
<v Speaker 1>trade ever we did into an e t F was

0:03:23.639 --> 0:03:27.280
<v Speaker 1>buying t I P, which is a Treasury inflation protected

0:03:27.880 --> 0:03:30.400
<v Speaker 1>U e t F, and we sold calls off of it.

0:03:30.400 --> 0:03:32.000
<v Speaker 1>I think we're gonna get into some of that type

0:03:32.000 --> 0:03:35.320
<v Speaker 1>of thing later. And we did it because it was

0:03:35.360 --> 0:03:39.160
<v Speaker 1>a way to diversify away and protect or hedge the

0:03:39.240 --> 0:03:41.680
<v Speaker 1>rest of our portfolio. And this was not that long

0:03:41.720 --> 0:03:44.120
<v Speaker 1>ago two eight so that was what you did. What

0:03:44.160 --> 0:03:47.040
<v Speaker 1>do you do now? So four or five years later,

0:03:47.040 --> 0:03:49.080
<v Speaker 1>I guess it was two thousand twelve, I started to

0:03:49.160 --> 0:03:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Rosto Investments. The core idea was to have an E

0:03:52.320 --> 0:03:54.840
<v Speaker 1>t F research company and use that E t F

0:03:54.960 --> 0:03:58.720
<v Speaker 1>research for a primary portfolio that's based on protection. We

0:03:58.880 --> 0:04:01.720
<v Speaker 1>use the acid algy Sha model of the permanent portfolio

0:04:02.160 --> 0:04:04.520
<v Speaker 1>and we fill it in with intelligent et F choices.

0:04:04.960 --> 0:04:09.040
<v Speaker 1>So I spend my time researching tickers and talking to

0:04:09.080 --> 0:04:13.280
<v Speaker 1>people like Eric Um all day, all night, and we

0:04:13.320 --> 0:04:15.600
<v Speaker 1>have to do it for a little while. Uh, So

0:04:15.680 --> 0:04:18.960
<v Speaker 1>talk about who your clients are. Sure, So we have

0:04:19.040 --> 0:04:22.680
<v Speaker 1>two types of clients. We have an individuals who come

0:04:22.720 --> 0:04:25.360
<v Speaker 1>to us and want advice on which ETF to own,

0:04:25.440 --> 0:04:28.680
<v Speaker 1>whether it's for our asset allocation models or something they're

0:04:28.720 --> 0:04:31.120
<v Speaker 1>trying to do. Then we deal on the other end

0:04:31.320 --> 0:04:34.640
<v Speaker 1>with the institutions. And the institutions are two parts, people

0:04:34.640 --> 0:04:37.159
<v Speaker 1>who want to use ETFs, people who are issuing e

0:04:37.200 --> 0:04:39.440
<v Speaker 1>t F s, and through our we call our e

0:04:39.520 --> 0:04:43.680
<v Speaker 1>t F think tank, we connect both and enjoy the conversation. Okay,

0:04:43.720 --> 0:04:46.720
<v Speaker 1>let's go ahead and talk about hedging. Then, Eric and

0:04:46.760 --> 0:04:51.400
<v Speaker 1>your primary you talk about vix VIX. Uh this is

0:04:51.440 --> 0:04:54.720
<v Speaker 1>a very controversial, highly dangerous area. The VIX is an

0:04:54.760 --> 0:04:57.320
<v Speaker 1>index that measures volatility on options, as known as the

0:04:57.320 --> 0:04:59.400
<v Speaker 1>fear did right. So if it starts moving a lot,

0:04:59.440 --> 0:05:01.560
<v Speaker 1>it means people are taking out insurance on their portfolios,

0:05:01.560 --> 0:05:03.080
<v Speaker 1>which is what they do with options. So if the

0:05:03.160 --> 0:05:05.080
<v Speaker 1>VIX goes up, it means people are buying insurance, and

0:05:05.160 --> 0:05:07.960
<v Speaker 1>that means volatility as a foot. So the VIX goes

0:05:08.040 --> 0:05:10.720
<v Speaker 1>up when people are nervous. Now, there's no et F

0:05:10.760 --> 0:05:13.359
<v Speaker 1>that tracks the VIX. It's a calculation, it's not a

0:05:13.400 --> 0:05:15.880
<v Speaker 1>real thing. But there are futures on the VIX. So

0:05:15.920 --> 0:05:17.160
<v Speaker 1>the e t F s and e t n s

0:05:17.200 --> 0:05:19.440
<v Speaker 1>track those futures. And these are the bad boys. These

0:05:19.480 --> 0:05:22.799
<v Speaker 1>are totally the bad boys. Because red lights, oh red lights,

0:05:22.920 --> 0:05:25.320
<v Speaker 1>but with a score of about ten or thirteen. So

0:05:25.400 --> 0:05:28.640
<v Speaker 1>there's the n C seventeen on my stop lights system easily.

0:05:29.200 --> 0:05:32.760
<v Speaker 1>So why people love them even though they lose money

0:05:32.920 --> 0:05:35.040
<v Speaker 1>year after year and like all of them are down

0:05:35.080 --> 0:05:38.640
<v Speaker 1>about nine since launching. The reason people love them is

0:05:38.720 --> 0:05:42.760
<v Speaker 1>jackpot potential because when the market goes down, nothing will

0:05:42.760 --> 0:05:45.400
<v Speaker 1>come close to the what you get with the VXX

0:05:45.480 --> 0:05:47.760
<v Speaker 1>or that kind of return. So for example, you look

0:05:47.760 --> 0:05:52.479
<v Speaker 1>at something like in August, market was down four percent

0:05:52.560 --> 0:05:56.240
<v Speaker 1>that day v XX was up. Now that's way beyond

0:05:56.360 --> 0:05:59.200
<v Speaker 1>even a triple leverage in verse SNP. Then you go

0:05:59.240 --> 0:06:01.720
<v Speaker 1>to a bad month market down eight percent, VIX is

0:06:01.800 --> 0:06:04.920
<v Speaker 1>up or VXX rather, and then two thou eight when

0:06:04.920 --> 0:06:07.400
<v Speaker 1>the market was sound thirty eight percent, v XX wasn't around,

0:06:07.440 --> 0:06:10.480
<v Speaker 1>but the index at tracks was up a d so

0:06:10.520 --> 0:06:13.760
<v Speaker 1>that jackpot potential is what draws people like a shiny object.

0:06:14.160 --> 0:06:15.760
<v Speaker 1>The problem is a lot of people if they get

0:06:15.800 --> 0:06:17.840
<v Speaker 1>too close and hang out there, they lose a lot

0:06:17.880 --> 0:06:19.719
<v Speaker 1>of money because you have to roll those futures and

0:06:19.760 --> 0:06:22.159
<v Speaker 1>that can cost you thirty percent a year. So it

0:06:22.240 --> 0:06:24.760
<v Speaker 1>is an expensive hedge and you could lose a lot

0:06:24.839 --> 0:06:27.520
<v Speaker 1>of money. But the reason it sticks around and has

0:06:27.560 --> 0:06:29.760
<v Speaker 1>an audience is because it can pay off big time.

0:06:30.320 --> 0:06:32.240
<v Speaker 1>Sounds a little bit like when you go fishing and

0:06:32.240 --> 0:06:35.400
<v Speaker 1>you use that really fancy lure, you know that catches

0:06:35.440 --> 0:06:37.400
<v Speaker 1>all the light in the water. That's what this sounds

0:06:37.400 --> 0:06:39.719
<v Speaker 1>like a little bit, right, Yeah, you gotta be careful

0:06:39.720 --> 0:06:42.599
<v Speaker 1>because you get like might get caught. Absolutely, Yeah, don't

0:06:42.600 --> 0:06:44.760
<v Speaker 1>take the bait is probably the best advice for almost

0:06:44.839 --> 0:06:47.640
<v Speaker 1>all investors, except for people who really know what they're doing.

0:06:48.160 --> 0:06:50.000
<v Speaker 1>And Mike, so, how have you guys been talking about

0:06:50.000 --> 0:06:53.919
<v Speaker 1>this with clients? So using the VIX is extremely complicated.

0:06:54.360 --> 0:06:57.560
<v Speaker 1>I totally agree that it is nc SEV, maybe even

0:06:57.600 --> 0:06:59.720
<v Speaker 1>triple X. I don't even know if they use those

0:06:59.720 --> 0:07:03.280
<v Speaker 1>any work. But the biggest issue with VXX or T

0:07:03.520 --> 0:07:07.000
<v Speaker 1>VIX or any of these. Isn't just that you have

0:07:07.160 --> 0:07:10.200
<v Speaker 1>to know how much you want to hedge. You have

0:07:10.240 --> 0:07:14.760
<v Speaker 1>to know exactly when, like when to the precise second day,

0:07:15.080 --> 0:07:19.720
<v Speaker 1>because the decay the cost of this insurance is enormous.

0:07:19.800 --> 0:07:21.520
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know that, do you know? Do you

0:07:21.560 --> 0:07:23.880
<v Speaker 1>know that you know when? I don't believe anybody can

0:07:23.880 --> 0:07:26.000
<v Speaker 1>really know when. I'm sure there are some tactical people

0:07:26.000 --> 0:07:27.920
<v Speaker 1>out there who think they do. But yeah, look, I

0:07:27.920 --> 0:07:29.680
<v Speaker 1>mean this is why I use Biff from Back to

0:07:29.720 --> 0:07:31.960
<v Speaker 1>the Future too. Remember how we got the Guide to

0:07:32.000 --> 0:07:34.080
<v Speaker 1>the Sports and he and he got he was like

0:07:34.080 --> 0:07:36.240
<v Speaker 1>the richest guy in the country because he knew the future.

0:07:37.040 --> 0:07:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Unless you have the guide to what the vix is

0:07:39.680 --> 0:07:43.760
<v Speaker 1>going to do in the future and your Biff, nobody knows.

0:07:43.800 --> 0:07:46.280
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's you know, that is Timing is

0:07:46.320 --> 0:07:49.600
<v Speaker 1>everything with the vix UH and VXX. But like I said,

0:07:49.600 --> 0:07:51.880
<v Speaker 1>if you have some special insight into the future, or

0:07:51.960 --> 0:07:54.560
<v Speaker 1>if you really, really really just think tomorrow is going

0:07:54.600 --> 0:07:57.640
<v Speaker 1>to be horrendous, there's really no problem with holding it

0:07:57.680 --> 0:08:00.000
<v Speaker 1>for a day. It wouldn't corrode that much in one day.

0:08:00.200 --> 0:08:02.080
<v Speaker 1>You gotta get out quick. Can you say all what

0:08:02.160 --> 0:08:06.040
<v Speaker 1>you just said in Biff's voice, come on, McFly, you

0:08:06.040 --> 0:08:09.920
<v Speaker 1>should say it. Come on, he's the Michael Winslow of

0:08:09.960 --> 0:08:12.040
<v Speaker 1>the two of us. Okay, so there's another bad boy,

0:08:12.280 --> 0:08:18.440
<v Speaker 1>maybe on par with Biff inverse. Yeah, So inverse is

0:08:18.840 --> 0:08:21.480
<v Speaker 1>that's basically saying we're going to short the SP five hundred,

0:08:21.480 --> 0:08:24.200
<v Speaker 1>either using swaps or futures, and so if the SMP

0:08:24.240 --> 0:08:27.000
<v Speaker 1>five hundred goes down, say two percent, they should go

0:08:27.120 --> 0:08:30.440
<v Speaker 1>up to. Then they've got double leveraged short and triple

0:08:30.520 --> 0:08:33.800
<v Speaker 1>leveraged like a hoverboard. Yeah, but s h is the

0:08:33.800 --> 0:08:36.520
<v Speaker 1>one I think is interesting because Eric didn't take that bait.

0:08:37.160 --> 0:08:38.719
<v Speaker 1>Oh sorry, I put the hoverboard out there and you

0:08:38.760 --> 0:08:42.280
<v Speaker 1>didn't jump on it. That was now I can't even

0:08:42.280 --> 0:08:44.720
<v Speaker 1>touch that. That's just untouchable owning. This one is like

0:08:44.720 --> 0:08:48.880
<v Speaker 1>when Biff runs into the manure truck and yeah, it

0:08:48.960 --> 0:08:53.280
<v Speaker 1>can be run pretty short and stinky. Look, Okay. The

0:08:53.600 --> 0:08:55.679
<v Speaker 1>one I think is interesting, and I'd like to get

0:08:55.679 --> 0:09:00.400
<v Speaker 1>Mike's opinion on sh this is inverse SMP five. You

0:09:00.440 --> 0:09:03.000
<v Speaker 1>have to reset the short position. So there is a

0:09:03.080 --> 0:09:05.679
<v Speaker 1>volatility drag that and we won't go into the details here,

0:09:05.760 --> 0:09:08.240
<v Speaker 1>just know that there is there is a corrosion to

0:09:08.720 --> 0:09:10.920
<v Speaker 1>it's a costly hedge as well, but nowhere near v

0:09:11.120 --> 0:09:14.439
<v Speaker 1>x x, and essentially if the market goes down to percent,

0:09:14.520 --> 0:09:17.120
<v Speaker 1>this will go up to Curious what you think whether

0:09:17.440 --> 0:09:19.920
<v Speaker 1>this is viable? You could you could hold this a

0:09:19.920 --> 0:09:22.720
<v Speaker 1>little longer without that extreme decay of v xx or

0:09:22.760 --> 0:09:24.760
<v Speaker 1>would you also put this in don't touch it ever?

0:09:25.320 --> 0:09:28.600
<v Speaker 1>So with v x x, it's all about timing. You

0:09:28.679 --> 0:09:31.760
<v Speaker 1>have to get the time right with this. With s H,

0:09:31.880 --> 0:09:34.920
<v Speaker 1>it's not just timing. It's a little less important here,

0:09:35.280 --> 0:09:37.640
<v Speaker 1>but it's also about the direction of the market. So

0:09:37.679 --> 0:09:40.960
<v Speaker 1>it's not just down, but is it volatile down? So

0:09:41.040 --> 0:09:44.319
<v Speaker 1>this reset that you're describing that can cause it to

0:09:44.400 --> 0:09:47.439
<v Speaker 1>decay is rapidly as v x X. So now you've

0:09:47.480 --> 0:09:49.920
<v Speaker 1>added yet another element that you've got to get right.

0:09:50.200 --> 0:09:52.280
<v Speaker 1>And the reset is just to break this down. For

0:09:52.320 --> 0:09:56.080
<v Speaker 1>anyone out there is leverage ets or inverse ETFs, they

0:09:56.120 --> 0:09:58.480
<v Speaker 1>have to reset their leverage every day so they account

0:09:58.480 --> 0:10:00.480
<v Speaker 1>for the new people coming in. You can't do two

0:10:00.480 --> 0:10:03.080
<v Speaker 1>times from like two years ago, and you have to

0:10:03.120 --> 0:10:06.600
<v Speaker 1>reset it every day there for people coming in and out.

0:10:06.600 --> 0:10:09.280
<v Speaker 1>It makes sense, but when you reset at prices that

0:10:09.320 --> 0:10:12.160
<v Speaker 1>are going all over the place all that it just

0:10:12.200 --> 0:10:15.800
<v Speaker 1>creates a like a Matthew kind of corrosion because you're

0:10:15.800 --> 0:10:18.720
<v Speaker 1>resetting all. If it goes up a similar direction, you

0:10:18.760 --> 0:10:21.880
<v Speaker 1>start resetting higher and higher, and you actually compound a

0:10:21.880 --> 0:10:25.079
<v Speaker 1>little bit. So you have volatility drag in almost all cases,

0:10:25.120 --> 0:10:27.840
<v Speaker 1>which can corrode this insurance. But every now and then,

0:10:28.160 --> 0:10:30.320
<v Speaker 1>if it does go up straight, you get the compounding effect,

0:10:30.320 --> 0:10:32.800
<v Speaker 1>which can help. So I think you're right. If you

0:10:33.240 --> 0:10:35.640
<v Speaker 1>have a feeling the market could go down steadily over

0:10:35.679 --> 0:10:38.320
<v Speaker 1>the next year, s H would make a lot of sense, right, Yes,

0:10:38.400 --> 0:10:41.160
<v Speaker 1>But as we saw recently, we have one day down

0:10:41.160 --> 0:10:43.360
<v Speaker 1>at thousand points, one day up at thousand points, one

0:10:43.400 --> 0:10:47.320
<v Speaker 1>day down thousand points. That is terrible for something like SH.

0:10:47.400 --> 0:10:51.240
<v Speaker 1>You actually could still lose money even though you're inverse. Tactically,

0:10:51.559 --> 0:10:55.360
<v Speaker 1>why would someone use this and and how much would they?

0:10:55.480 --> 0:10:58.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, dial up the volume with it. So people

0:10:58.720 --> 0:11:03.280
<v Speaker 1>who understand tactical or believe they figured it out, they

0:11:03.360 --> 0:11:06.280
<v Speaker 1>use this all day long. UM. They may be hedge funds,

0:11:06.600 --> 0:11:09.200
<v Speaker 1>they may be et F strategists. I mean good Harbor

0:11:09.360 --> 0:11:13.240
<v Speaker 1>in the old days was known for this. UM. This

0:11:13.320 --> 0:11:16.959
<v Speaker 1>is not for your average investor to make a strategic allocation.

0:11:17.400 --> 0:11:21.320
<v Speaker 1>This is the difference between owning something, buying hold and

0:11:21.640 --> 0:11:24.520
<v Speaker 1>trying to guess when something's going to happen and react.

0:11:25.120 --> 0:11:28.560
<v Speaker 1>You can't simply buy this and then go to work

0:11:28.960 --> 0:11:31.360
<v Speaker 1>unless you want to lose your hands. This trades to

0:11:31.559 --> 0:11:34.000
<v Speaker 1>change saw. It's a change saw. You better be careful.

0:11:34.080 --> 0:11:36.280
<v Speaker 1>And you know there are people who are like say,

0:11:36.320 --> 0:11:40.040
<v Speaker 1>like bitcoin investors, people who just love gambling and speculating.

0:11:40.559 --> 0:11:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Those kind of retail investors are attracted this, but you

0:11:43.240 --> 0:11:45.480
<v Speaker 1>they are. They're messaging each other on Reddit and they're

0:11:45.600 --> 0:11:48.600
<v Speaker 1>informed that you can't hold it. What you don't want

0:11:48.640 --> 0:11:52.200
<v Speaker 1>is somebody who is retail a or even institutional and

0:11:52.280 --> 0:11:55.440
<v Speaker 1>just doesn't understand that and is sticks and it. You

0:11:55.480 --> 0:11:57.880
<v Speaker 1>can tell from the trading volume of these like these

0:11:57.960 --> 0:12:02.160
<v Speaker 1>leverage gtfs and vix ETFs trade about fift their assets

0:12:02.200 --> 0:12:04.839
<v Speaker 1>every day. That is a humongous turnover. That means they

0:12:04.840 --> 0:12:08.640
<v Speaker 1>are being used correctly. As hot potatoes. Five six years ago,

0:12:08.679 --> 0:12:10.920
<v Speaker 1>I think you saw less volume because people were unsure

0:12:10.920 --> 0:12:12.640
<v Speaker 1>how to use them. But there's a lot of teachable

0:12:12.679 --> 0:12:15.120
<v Speaker 1>moments since then, so I do think they're probably mostly

0:12:15.160 --> 0:12:18.080
<v Speaker 1>in the right hands, but they definitely should be labeled

0:12:18.480 --> 0:12:22.839
<v Speaker 1>just like the vixed products. The labels are all over them, right.

0:12:23.080 --> 0:12:25.760
<v Speaker 1>If you notice all of these, even in their their name,

0:12:25.920 --> 0:12:28.440
<v Speaker 1>it says daily like they they have gone out of

0:12:28.440 --> 0:12:31.440
<v Speaker 1>their way to warn the public. We have created the

0:12:31.440 --> 0:12:36.160
<v Speaker 1>sharpest knives. And unless you've completed Wolfgang's Pucks TV show

0:12:36.280 --> 0:12:38.880
<v Speaker 1>or something, don't pick this up. Just like we've been

0:12:38.880 --> 0:12:41.160
<v Speaker 1>hearing recently. If you're gonna own the vixed products, read

0:12:41.320 --> 0:12:45.360
<v Speaker 1>every line of of the prospectus with the leverage and

0:12:45.440 --> 0:12:48.400
<v Speaker 1>inverse it says it in the name, right, I don't

0:12:48.400 --> 0:12:58.320
<v Speaker 1>think it could be more black and white than night. Okay,

0:12:58.320 --> 0:13:01.640
<v Speaker 1>So that was the advanced section, hyper advanced. Maybe let's

0:13:01.640 --> 0:13:06.719
<v Speaker 1>go to that sort of the intermediate territory because put options,

0:13:06.880 --> 0:13:11.000
<v Speaker 1>for instance, this becomes much more common. Yeah, writing options

0:13:11.160 --> 0:13:14.240
<v Speaker 1>on your portfolio or buying them is a popular method.

0:13:14.559 --> 0:13:16.800
<v Speaker 1>If you look at E t F, the E t

0:13:16.920 --> 0:13:18.920
<v Speaker 1>F s out there have options on them that you

0:13:18.920 --> 0:13:21.640
<v Speaker 1>know you could trade or buy or sell, and most

0:13:21.640 --> 0:13:23.600
<v Speaker 1>of those options are in the top ten e t fs,

0:13:23.640 --> 0:13:25.959
<v Speaker 1>like Spy is basically like half the equity market in

0:13:26.040 --> 0:13:29.160
<v Speaker 1>option violence, it's a monster. I W M E M

0:13:29.160 --> 0:13:31.760
<v Speaker 1>and that's a big fertile market. People trade those things

0:13:31.760 --> 0:13:34.440
<v Speaker 1>and do actual tactical moves. But there are people buying

0:13:34.440 --> 0:13:36.520
<v Speaker 1>any options for insurance. So a put option would be

0:13:36.559 --> 0:13:39.440
<v Speaker 1>a way to ensure your portfolio. But again you have

0:13:39.520 --> 0:13:42.160
<v Speaker 1>to pay for it, and you have it expires, so

0:13:42.200 --> 0:13:44.120
<v Speaker 1>you'll have to think about Okay, it's expiring, it got

0:13:44.160 --> 0:13:46.760
<v Speaker 1>to buy another one, and that that affects its price. Yeah,

0:13:46.880 --> 0:13:49.640
<v Speaker 1>so that is also away again just because now we're

0:13:49.640 --> 0:13:51.720
<v Speaker 1>dealing with derivatives. I put in the intermediate, but it's

0:13:51.760 --> 0:13:54.839
<v Speaker 1>not nearly as wild as say the vix or inverse world.

0:13:55.240 --> 0:13:56.760
<v Speaker 1>And this one is well, you have to get the

0:13:56.760 --> 0:13:59.560
<v Speaker 1>timing right, but you don't have to commit so much.

0:14:00.200 --> 0:14:06.120
<v Speaker 1>You daily, daily at a time. Yes, and and the

0:14:06.160 --> 0:14:08.840
<v Speaker 1>decay of the cost or the actual cost you're gonna

0:14:08.880 --> 0:14:11.280
<v Speaker 1>put in, you know from day one. Give an example

0:14:11.320 --> 0:14:13.320
<v Speaker 1>of buying an option like on on s p Y,

0:14:13.480 --> 0:14:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Like what just take us through that trade. So let's

0:14:16.000 --> 0:14:20.640
<v Speaker 1>say you think SPY is going to decline, you simply

0:14:20.640 --> 0:14:24.480
<v Speaker 1>would purchase a put at ten percent below or at

0:14:24.520 --> 0:14:27.120
<v Speaker 1>the money that that all can get very complicated, but

0:14:27.160 --> 0:14:29.440
<v Speaker 1>ten percent below it's trading in a hundred today, you

0:14:29.440 --> 0:14:31.440
<v Speaker 1>would buy it. You would buy a put for ninety

0:14:31.800 --> 0:14:33.840
<v Speaker 1>buy a put for nine because that would be cheaper.

0:14:34.280 --> 0:14:38.240
<v Speaker 1>Meaning if the SMP goes down what to then you

0:14:38.280 --> 0:14:41.720
<v Speaker 1>can then guarantee to sell it to that person for nine. Yes,

0:14:41.760 --> 0:14:44.880
<v Speaker 1>but in the interim, if it moves down at all,

0:14:45.120 --> 0:14:47.560
<v Speaker 1>the put option would start to move. So it's not

0:14:47.600 --> 0:14:49.480
<v Speaker 1>that you can be completely hands off with this, but

0:14:49.520 --> 0:14:51.600
<v Speaker 1>it's a little bit more hands off and you can

0:14:51.600 --> 0:14:53.400
<v Speaker 1>go the other way, which is called a call. Yes

0:14:53.440 --> 0:14:57.120
<v Speaker 1>you could. But even more interesting, what et s beautifully

0:14:57.160 --> 0:14:59.640
<v Speaker 1>do for all of us is they'll take strategies like

0:14:59.640 --> 0:15:02.000
<v Speaker 1>this and stick it in the wrapper so you don't

0:15:02.000 --> 0:15:04.920
<v Speaker 1>have to go and do this. So there's by right strategies,

0:15:04.960 --> 0:15:08.480
<v Speaker 1>there's put right strategies. Um, there's one now that buys

0:15:08.560 --> 0:15:13.720
<v Speaker 1>treasuries I think it's tail, and then uses the income

0:15:13.760 --> 0:15:16.400
<v Speaker 1>from those treasuries to buy puts on the SMP. What's

0:15:16.400 --> 0:15:19.160
<v Speaker 1>a classic one that does what we just the scenario

0:15:19.160 --> 0:15:22.240
<v Speaker 1>where you're protecting the downside with options inside and ETF

0:15:22.360 --> 0:15:25.320
<v Speaker 1>what's a good example. Um, I think that tail one

0:15:25.320 --> 0:15:27.760
<v Speaker 1>that I was just describing is probably the purest example

0:15:27.800 --> 0:15:30.520
<v Speaker 1>of that, but there's plenty of others that have used

0:15:30.520 --> 0:15:34.240
<v Speaker 1>options over the years to mitigate volatility. So um, the

0:15:34.360 --> 0:15:37.040
<v Speaker 1>PDP is a great example. To put right is another

0:15:37.080 --> 0:15:40.480
<v Speaker 1>great example, p U t W. And then there's funds

0:15:40.720 --> 0:15:43.400
<v Speaker 1>of option writing funds. So I like this one. Why

0:15:43.440 --> 0:15:46.600
<v Speaker 1>why why? It's an income fund that's a great ticker

0:15:46.720 --> 0:15:50.000
<v Speaker 1>yield yield yield. It might be Eric's boy band had

0:15:50.040 --> 0:15:52.560
<v Speaker 1>when he was in high school. I like that. But

0:15:53.480 --> 0:15:56.840
<v Speaker 1>all it is is it's a bunch of closes. Inever

0:15:57.600 --> 0:15:59.920
<v Speaker 1>why y y? It sounds like frosted tip, Eric Bolton.

0:16:00.280 --> 0:16:01.920
<v Speaker 1>I did use a lot of gel in high school.

0:16:01.960 --> 0:16:06.320
<v Speaker 1>I'll admit it. I was all over the depth gel. Yeah.

0:16:06.600 --> 0:16:13.680
<v Speaker 1>That was my jam. That was like a firm hold. Yeah. Anyway, okay,

0:16:13.720 --> 0:16:16.040
<v Speaker 1>So put options is one that's sort of the intermediate.

0:16:16.440 --> 0:16:19.120
<v Speaker 1>Let's let's talk about the alternative space because we're talking

0:16:19.160 --> 0:16:22.680
<v Speaker 1>about rappers here. Uh, there's a lot of hedge fund

0:16:22.720 --> 0:16:24.680
<v Speaker 1>strategies that have been wrapped up in in the E

0:16:24.760 --> 0:16:27.440
<v Speaker 1>T F rapper as well. I can talk about that

0:16:27.480 --> 0:16:31.440
<v Speaker 1>because that's also sort of an intermediate place. Sure, so um,

0:16:31.560 --> 0:16:34.480
<v Speaker 1>hedge funds are misunderstood. Most people think they're trying to

0:16:34.520 --> 0:16:37.840
<v Speaker 1>babe ruth the performance and get like return every year.

0:16:37.840 --> 0:16:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Like Christian Bale on the big short. There are some

0:16:39.800 --> 0:16:42.360
<v Speaker 1>to do that those are up section, but most of

0:16:42.400 --> 0:16:44.720
<v Speaker 1>them do what the name says, they hedge. They are

0:16:44.720 --> 0:16:48.680
<v Speaker 1>trying to find some kind of weird obscure risk premium

0:16:48.680 --> 0:16:52.640
<v Speaker 1>in the market somewhere, capture it and eliminate market volatility

0:16:52.680 --> 0:16:55.840
<v Speaker 1>to serve up a low vall risk adjust to return.

0:16:55.920 --> 0:16:58.640
<v Speaker 1>That's actually it's sometimes some of them are voltile is

0:16:58.680 --> 0:17:01.840
<v Speaker 1>a bond fund, right, They're very misunderstood. So a lot

0:17:01.880 --> 0:17:04.080
<v Speaker 1>of the alternatives in that have been wrapped the hedge

0:17:04.119 --> 0:17:06.240
<v Speaker 1>funds strikes have been wrapped up into et fs. Do

0:17:06.400 --> 0:17:09.159
<v Speaker 1>that they do merger are their long short, they do

0:17:09.320 --> 0:17:13.000
<v Speaker 1>managed futures um so it is very complicated area. That's

0:17:13.000 --> 0:17:15.720
<v Speaker 1>the downside of this. Well, they can do some things

0:17:16.200 --> 0:17:18.400
<v Speaker 1>that hedge funds do for a lot less than hedge

0:17:18.440 --> 0:17:21.400
<v Speaker 1>funds charge, so they've democratized hedge fund investing. But they're

0:17:21.480 --> 0:17:23.800
<v Speaker 1>very complicated. But what they do is they produce a

0:17:23.880 --> 0:17:27.000
<v Speaker 1>return stream that is not correlated to stocks and bonds,

0:17:27.400 --> 0:17:29.840
<v Speaker 1>hence alternative. And the reason they're called liquid alternatives is

0:17:29.880 --> 0:17:33.280
<v Speaker 1>because only hedge funds which have lock ups, which means

0:17:33.359 --> 0:17:35.879
<v Speaker 1>for multiple years you might be locked out of getting

0:17:35.880 --> 0:17:39.920
<v Speaker 1>your money back. Correct so ultimately, alternatives is a category

0:17:39.920 --> 0:17:42.600
<v Speaker 1>that's pretty broad. Hedge funds is one of example of

0:17:42.640 --> 0:17:44.840
<v Speaker 1>an alternative. But by the way, none of us are

0:17:44.840 --> 0:17:46.280
<v Speaker 1>going to be able to well, at least the three

0:17:46.320 --> 0:17:47.840
<v Speaker 1>of us are probably gonna be able to put much

0:17:47.840 --> 0:17:50.920
<v Speaker 1>money on a hedge fund, which here with the EF. Yeah,

0:17:50.920 --> 0:17:54.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm still a thousand are Yeah, So I would

0:17:54.320 --> 0:17:57.280
<v Speaker 1>never qualify for any hedge fund, but the HF, nor

0:17:57.320 --> 0:17:59.000
<v Speaker 1>would you probably be able to pay for it, which

0:17:59.040 --> 0:18:00.760
<v Speaker 1>is do you know what I want to go into one?

0:18:00.800 --> 0:18:03.960
<v Speaker 1>To be honest with you, Um, I'm fine. Look the

0:18:04.040 --> 0:18:07.920
<v Speaker 1>minds of JP Morgan, Index I Q Goldman Sacks, they've

0:18:08.000 --> 0:18:12.119
<v Speaker 1>made hedge fund ETFs using actual their brains and doing

0:18:12.200 --> 0:18:14.960
<v Speaker 1>hedge fund strategies. You can get anything that hedge fund

0:18:15.000 --> 0:18:17.720
<v Speaker 1>does except for the special star manager, I mean that

0:18:17.760 --> 0:18:20.480
<v Speaker 1>will always exist, but the general strategies are ETFs. This

0:18:20.560 --> 0:18:22.880
<v Speaker 1>category is pretty small though, only about two three billion

0:18:22.920 --> 0:18:25.919
<v Speaker 1>in assets. Um, Mike, do you use any of these? Absolutely?

0:18:26.040 --> 0:18:28.920
<v Speaker 1>These are the things that I think ets are made

0:18:28.960 --> 0:18:32.159
<v Speaker 1>for democratizing access to things. So I've been saying for

0:18:32.320 --> 0:18:35.560
<v Speaker 1>years that hedge funds will just become a call it

0:18:36.240 --> 0:18:38.680
<v Speaker 1>kindergarten for e T s right. It's where people will

0:18:39.040 --> 0:18:43.000
<v Speaker 1>grow up ideas um And it's funny because it's kind

0:18:43.000 --> 0:18:44.720
<v Speaker 1>of what's happened with a lot of these things like

0:18:44.920 --> 0:18:49.920
<v Speaker 1>leverage and and using volatility in terms of alternatives to

0:18:50.119 --> 0:18:53.119
<v Speaker 1>use to protect the portfolio. I think what JP Morgan

0:18:53.240 --> 0:18:55.800
<v Speaker 1>is doing right now to bring out some traditional hedge

0:18:55.800 --> 0:18:59.800
<v Speaker 1>fund strategies in rappers that are more efficient. The one

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:02.080
<v Speaker 1>I have loved forever and you've heard me talk about

0:19:02.080 --> 0:19:04.920
<v Speaker 1>it on your other show, B T A. L Boy,

0:19:05.040 --> 0:19:11.320
<v Speaker 1>Thomas Apple, Larry. All this does is it's longfty low

0:19:12.280 --> 0:19:15.960
<v Speaker 1>risk stocks in the SMP all short the two fifty

0:19:16.160 --> 0:19:19.640
<v Speaker 1>high risk or high beta. The net result is when

0:19:19.680 --> 0:19:22.800
<v Speaker 1>the markets go down, this goes up. When the markets

0:19:22.840 --> 0:19:25.160
<v Speaker 1>go up, it goes down half as much as they've

0:19:25.200 --> 0:19:27.080
<v Speaker 1>gone up. So you miss out on a little bit

0:19:27.119 --> 0:19:29.920
<v Speaker 1>of everything. Yes, but with the things we talked about

0:19:29.920 --> 0:19:32.880
<v Speaker 1>in the first section, the vix and the shorts, there

0:19:32.920 --> 0:19:36.000
<v Speaker 1>one the one ratios right, you're gonna on the upside,

0:19:36.040 --> 0:19:38.040
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna lose as much as you're gonna make on

0:19:38.119 --> 0:19:41.439
<v Speaker 1>the downside. With something like this, the reason it's more

0:19:41.520 --> 0:19:44.760
<v Speaker 1>strategic and can be held longer is when the markets

0:19:44.800 --> 0:19:47.119
<v Speaker 1>are growing up, you're really only paying fifty cents for

0:19:47.240 --> 0:19:50.000
<v Speaker 1>that dollars worth of protection. Now betal in our system

0:19:50.040 --> 0:19:51.760
<v Speaker 1>does get a yellow Oh yeah, I'm sure it does.

0:19:52.320 --> 0:19:55.399
<v Speaker 1>It's complicated, it's alternative, and but really it's because when

0:19:55.480 --> 0:19:57.520
<v Speaker 1>you short anything, there is a cost to that. So

0:19:57.640 --> 0:19:59.520
<v Speaker 1>there's a there is a slate head when in that

0:19:59.640 --> 0:20:02.400
<v Speaker 1>cost and show up the expense ratio. But you find

0:20:02.440 --> 0:20:04.639
<v Speaker 1>that appropriate. Not you would pay it anyway if you

0:20:04.680 --> 0:20:06.359
<v Speaker 1>did it yourself. But what does that cost? Like in

0:20:06.440 --> 0:20:09.800
<v Speaker 1>betel so something like beatle, because half the portfolio is short,

0:20:10.119 --> 0:20:12.240
<v Speaker 1>that has a cost to borrow. To short something, you

0:20:12.359 --> 0:20:15.600
<v Speaker 1>have to borrow the stocks um and that gets passed

0:20:15.600 --> 0:20:18.600
<v Speaker 1>onto the end investor and it offsets whatever dividends you

0:20:18.600 --> 0:20:20.800
<v Speaker 1>would be getting from the other side. So the the

0:20:20.880 --> 0:20:23.520
<v Speaker 1>expense ratios that you'll see in a system will look

0:20:23.760 --> 0:20:27.280
<v Speaker 1>a little expensive. That said, for a hedge that you

0:20:27.359 --> 0:20:30.880
<v Speaker 1>can actually buy and hold, I like the concept. Okay,

0:20:30.880 --> 0:20:32.880
<v Speaker 1>now we're gonna get in a safe the safe zone.

0:20:33.280 --> 0:20:37.040
<v Speaker 1>And this hedge is one that everyone is actually familiar with.

0:20:37.600 --> 0:20:41.439
<v Speaker 1>Gold gold they're familiar with it, but boys are controversial.

0:20:41.480 --> 0:20:45.159
<v Speaker 1>It's like politics. There's gold bugs and there's gold haters

0:20:45.200 --> 0:20:47.760
<v Speaker 1>who are offended by the mere concept of gold. They

0:20:47.800 --> 0:20:50.159
<v Speaker 1>say it's just the rock and they don't like it.

0:20:50.359 --> 0:20:53.360
<v Speaker 1>So I know that it's get heated. So gold though.

0:20:54.240 --> 0:20:56.520
<v Speaker 1>The pro of using gold as a hedge, something like

0:20:56.680 --> 0:20:58.760
<v Speaker 1>g l D, which is the biggest gold, is that

0:20:58.880 --> 0:21:02.160
<v Speaker 1>it isn't correlated to the market at all. It's zero correlation.

0:21:02.320 --> 0:21:04.280
<v Speaker 1>No one knows why it does what it does. Correct,

0:21:04.640 --> 0:21:08.680
<v Speaker 1>that's the problem. It's also zero correlated, meaning if the

0:21:08.760 --> 0:21:11.239
<v Speaker 1>market goes down, gold may or may not go up.

0:21:11.480 --> 0:21:12.959
<v Speaker 1>It's sort of like a punk rock or it does

0:21:13.040 --> 0:21:15.720
<v Speaker 1>whatever the hell it wants to do, but that's its beauty.

0:21:15.760 --> 0:21:18.879
<v Speaker 1>You have to appreciate that it's a good diversifier, but

0:21:19.080 --> 0:21:21.159
<v Speaker 1>not a it's a shaky hedge. You do like the

0:21:21.200 --> 0:21:24.160
<v Speaker 1>remoons too? Huh? Yeah, I thought I was a little

0:21:25.000 --> 0:21:26.800
<v Speaker 1>I was a little more of a social distortion kind

0:21:26.840 --> 0:21:29.640
<v Speaker 1>of guy. Yeah, so, but the remains that you can't

0:21:29.680 --> 0:21:32.600
<v Speaker 1>not like, are you a punk rock fan? Mike? Uh no,

0:21:33.160 --> 0:21:35.240
<v Speaker 1>you guys were talking about high school earlier. I was

0:21:35.400 --> 0:21:39.240
<v Speaker 1>the debate champion, chess champion with long hair following the

0:21:39.280 --> 0:21:42.160
<v Speaker 1>Grateful Dead, So I'm definitely are you a gold bug

0:21:42.240 --> 0:21:45.280
<v Speaker 1>or a gold I am definitely a gold bug totally

0:21:45.320 --> 0:21:49.680
<v Speaker 1>have built my acid allocation model on the permanent portfolio,

0:21:49.760 --> 0:21:52.760
<v Speaker 1>which is gold. Now that said, that doesn't mean you

0:21:52.880 --> 0:21:55.480
<v Speaker 1>just buy g l D or B A R I AU.

0:21:56.080 --> 0:21:58.520
<v Speaker 1>There are smart ways to add to own gold like

0:21:58.800 --> 0:22:02.080
<v Speaker 1>um you know. To loop back to the other section

0:22:02.119 --> 0:22:04.080
<v Speaker 1>where we talked about options, one of the things I

0:22:04.160 --> 0:22:06.280
<v Speaker 1>love using is a little E T N called g

0:22:06.520 --> 0:22:10.359
<v Speaker 1>l D I A right so I own gold. It

0:22:10.440 --> 0:22:13.320
<v Speaker 1>sells calls on that gold, which gives me income off

0:22:13.400 --> 0:22:15.320
<v Speaker 1>my gold while I'm waiting for my gold to do

0:22:15.800 --> 0:22:19.040
<v Speaker 1>what we hope it will do. Moving to the mainstream

0:22:19.040 --> 0:22:20.760
<v Speaker 1>gold ETF So you've got g l D S forty

0:22:20.800 --> 0:22:23.920
<v Speaker 1>basis points I use. Then you've got these ones that

0:22:24.000 --> 0:22:27.720
<v Speaker 1>are for like hardcore paranoid gold people like one stores

0:22:27.760 --> 0:22:30.600
<v Speaker 1>it in Switzerland s g o L, and then one

0:22:30.840 --> 0:22:34.080
<v Speaker 1>will deliver you physical coins O U n Z. Where

0:22:34.119 --> 0:22:36.800
<v Speaker 1>do you stand? Do you think that the US would

0:22:36.840 --> 0:22:41.080
<v Speaker 1>ever confiscate gold? Like? Are you it has right? The

0:22:41.200 --> 0:22:43.760
<v Speaker 1>FDR did it? There are people s g O L

0:22:43.840 --> 0:22:47.600
<v Speaker 1>has a billion dollars just because it stores the golden Switzerland,

0:22:47.600 --> 0:22:49.760
<v Speaker 1>whereas g l D and I used store in the States.

0:22:49.800 --> 0:22:54.200
<v Speaker 1>In Canada, so I understand that extreme of the gold bugs,

0:22:54.359 --> 0:22:56.960
<v Speaker 1>and I wish them the best. I'm quite happy with

0:22:57.080 --> 0:22:58.800
<v Speaker 1>an I A U or g l D A B

0:22:58.960 --> 0:23:02.840
<v Speaker 1>A r B because in the scenario where getting that

0:23:02.920 --> 0:23:06.080
<v Speaker 1>physical gold matters, I don't think it matters that you

0:23:06.359 --> 0:23:09.400
<v Speaker 1>own an ETF that claims to have the physical gold. Yeah.

0:23:09.440 --> 0:23:13.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look, gold has been around. It survived many civilizations,

0:23:13.840 --> 0:23:17.040
<v Speaker 1>let alone generations, so I I respect it. I'm more agnostic,

0:23:17.520 --> 0:23:20.280
<v Speaker 1>and I do think it isn't it's extra shaky as

0:23:20.320 --> 0:23:23.159
<v Speaker 1>inflation hedge, but I have seen it work as a

0:23:23.240 --> 0:23:25.800
<v Speaker 1>crisis hedge. But in two thousand and eight, for example,

0:23:26.280 --> 0:23:28.720
<v Speaker 1>the market was doundt g l D was only up

0:23:28.760 --> 0:23:32.960
<v Speaker 1>three So again it it didn't go down, but it

0:23:33.200 --> 0:23:35.280
<v Speaker 1>could have gone down. It could have gone up. Who knows?

0:23:36.440 --> 0:23:38.879
<v Speaker 1>Who are these people? I'm just in my Jerry Seinfeld

0:23:39.200 --> 0:23:41.719
<v Speaker 1>emerged into Seinfeld. Sometimes I slowly get there and then

0:23:41.760 --> 0:23:44.399
<v Speaker 1>I end up with who are these people? Um? Just

0:23:44.520 --> 0:23:46.320
<v Speaker 1>to add on with gold one other thing, it gets

0:23:46.359 --> 0:23:48.280
<v Speaker 1>a green lightner system, but it does get a tag

0:23:48.359 --> 0:23:50.680
<v Speaker 1>with with A one. It has one infraction, which is

0:23:50.680 --> 0:23:52.720
<v Speaker 1>alternative tax treatment. If you buy g l D or

0:23:52.760 --> 0:23:55.360
<v Speaker 1>AU you get tax as if you want a collectible.

0:23:55.720 --> 0:23:57.359
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's just something to point out here,

0:23:57.400 --> 0:23:59.600
<v Speaker 1>and that's just one little tiny thing that does mar

0:23:59.800 --> 0:24:02.440
<v Speaker 1>the buying of gold in terms of it being like

0:24:02.520 --> 0:24:08.520
<v Speaker 1>plain vanilla. So the green light hedge's treasuries. Yes, so

0:24:08.640 --> 0:24:11.159
<v Speaker 1>this is what I call the organic aisle. This is

0:24:11.240 --> 0:24:17.040
<v Speaker 1>known unnatural preservatives, no chemicals. Treasuries are classic and they're big.

0:24:17.240 --> 0:24:19.280
<v Speaker 1>They've got billions of dollars in assets. People use them

0:24:19.320 --> 0:24:21.240
<v Speaker 1>all the time. Now, the question is where on the

0:24:21.359 --> 0:24:24.240
<v Speaker 1>curve right do you buy your treasury E t F. Like,

0:24:24.320 --> 0:24:27.480
<v Speaker 1>for example, t L T is a treasury E t F.

0:24:27.600 --> 0:24:30.639
<v Speaker 1>So the pro is it tends to spike up in

0:24:30.680 --> 0:24:32.840
<v Speaker 1>a crisis because there's a flight to safety. In two

0:24:32.880 --> 0:24:35.639
<v Speaker 1>thousand eight, t LT was up the exact amount more

0:24:35.720 --> 0:24:37.639
<v Speaker 1>or less that the market went down. It would have

0:24:37.720 --> 0:24:42.359
<v Speaker 1>completely offset your market losses. However, if rates are going up,

0:24:42.440 --> 0:24:44.040
<v Speaker 1>t LT is going to be hit the hardest. So

0:24:44.080 --> 0:24:46.719
<v Speaker 1>there's an interest rate component that makes t LT sensitive.

0:24:47.160 --> 0:24:48.919
<v Speaker 1>Then you start going down the curve till you get

0:24:48.960 --> 0:24:51.880
<v Speaker 1>to stuff that's closer to quote cash. That stuff will

0:24:52.000 --> 0:24:55.880
<v Speaker 1>buffer and it won't move, and it's it's consistency. It's

0:24:55.880 --> 0:24:57.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of like going under a mattress. So the pro

0:24:58.080 --> 0:24:59.840
<v Speaker 1>is it won't go down, but the con is it

0:25:00.160 --> 0:25:02.639
<v Speaker 1>go up either. So there's even a risk to the

0:25:02.800 --> 0:25:05.840
<v Speaker 1>organic treasuries depending on where you go on the curve. Mike,

0:25:05.880 --> 0:25:10.040
<v Speaker 1>do stuff stuff under your mattress using treasuries absolutely? Um

0:25:10.600 --> 0:25:12.920
<v Speaker 1>In in the short term space, I do use things

0:25:13.040 --> 0:25:15.080
<v Speaker 1>like an s h V, which is a very ultra

0:25:15.160 --> 0:25:18.879
<v Speaker 1>short term treasury index, right, so you're basically buying cash

0:25:19.119 --> 0:25:21.920
<v Speaker 1>instruments um in an e T F rappers so you

0:25:21.960 --> 0:25:23.440
<v Speaker 1>get a little bit more than cash out of it.

0:25:23.920 --> 0:25:26.320
<v Speaker 1>Is SHV the same thing as a money market fund?

0:25:26.359 --> 0:25:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Because I know some people probably use those. What's the difference?

0:25:28.760 --> 0:25:30.520
<v Speaker 1>And can you replace some money market fund with an

0:25:30.640 --> 0:25:33.639
<v Speaker 1>sh V? No, they are not the same thing. They

0:25:33.680 --> 0:25:36.879
<v Speaker 1>are very very very close, but you don't have that

0:25:37.000 --> 0:25:40.840
<v Speaker 1>guarantee of the dollar staying the exact same price. But

0:25:41.520 --> 0:25:43.200
<v Speaker 1>the amount of risk you're taking to get a little

0:25:43.200 --> 0:25:45.639
<v Speaker 1>bit more reward is probably worth it. What's the more

0:25:45.720 --> 0:25:48.240
<v Speaker 1>reward with sh V A few more basis points are

0:25:48.240 --> 0:25:51.399
<v Speaker 1>a few more per cents of a percent of yield

0:25:51.680 --> 0:25:55.080
<v Speaker 1>um and uh. I do think though, in that space,

0:25:55.119 --> 0:25:57.639
<v Speaker 1>if you want to stuff money under the mattress. If

0:25:57.720 --> 0:25:59.920
<v Speaker 1>that's the way you want to protect, which I add

0:26:00.000 --> 0:26:03.280
<v Speaker 1>resolutely advocate have some money on the side. Some cash

0:26:03.680 --> 0:26:06.000
<v Speaker 1>cash is good, but you can go to some of

0:26:06.040 --> 0:26:09.320
<v Speaker 1>the more interesting ones to get a little bit more yield.

0:26:09.400 --> 0:26:11.840
<v Speaker 1>Like I think First Trust does a great job with

0:26:12.200 --> 0:26:15.640
<v Speaker 1>f t SM. It's a short term fixed income fun

0:26:15.760 --> 0:26:18.920
<v Speaker 1>and it's actively managed, especially with these short term things.

0:26:19.080 --> 0:26:22.080
<v Speaker 1>I do think active management in fixed income makes a

0:26:22.119 --> 0:26:25.920
<v Speaker 1>big difference. But before I I get too far down

0:26:25.960 --> 0:26:29.160
<v Speaker 1>the line on the short term stuff, the long term stuff,

0:26:29.200 --> 0:26:33.159
<v Speaker 1>the t l t s, those can be painful. Um

0:26:33.440 --> 0:26:36.360
<v Speaker 1>So you know this year, for example, it's down, It's

0:26:36.440 --> 0:26:39.119
<v Speaker 1>down a lot. It's down almost six or seven percent

0:26:39.680 --> 0:26:41.960
<v Speaker 1>over the first couple of months of the year. In

0:26:42.080 --> 0:26:45.840
<v Speaker 1>two thousand fourteen fifteen, you had moves in these things

0:26:45.920 --> 0:26:50.800
<v Speaker 1>that are up in long term treasuries. People get confused

0:26:50.840 --> 0:26:52.919
<v Speaker 1>by that this is long term treasuries and it can move.

0:26:54.000 --> 0:26:55.960
<v Speaker 1>It can go the other way as well. I don't

0:26:56.000 --> 0:26:58.120
<v Speaker 1>want anybody to wake up one day going I thought

0:26:58.160 --> 0:27:01.120
<v Speaker 1>I had long term treasuries and I lost four that's

0:27:01.160 --> 0:27:04.680
<v Speaker 1>actually possible. The the the organic part comes from the

0:27:04.760 --> 0:27:07.280
<v Speaker 1>fact that it's just treasury bills there's nothing else going

0:27:07.359 --> 0:27:09.080
<v Speaker 1>on in that fun it's a it's a green light

0:27:09.200 --> 0:27:11.600
<v Speaker 1>zero for us, but I agree, and there's ones to

0:27:11.680 --> 0:27:13.960
<v Speaker 1>even go further out in the curve. But I agree

0:27:14.000 --> 0:27:16.000
<v Speaker 1>that there's a volatility level of deal. How can you

0:27:16.080 --> 0:27:20.000
<v Speaker 1>give that a green light? Well, because our system is

0:27:20.040 --> 0:27:23.200
<v Speaker 1>not passing judgment on the user or their motivation. It's

0:27:23.240 --> 0:27:25.080
<v Speaker 1>just saying, is there anything in this et F the

0:27:25.119 --> 0:27:27.920
<v Speaker 1>packaging of it that might be a surprise to me?

0:27:28.640 --> 0:27:31.159
<v Speaker 1>And in the case of treasuries, we're assuming you know

0:27:31.359 --> 0:27:33.320
<v Speaker 1>that these are twenty plus your treasuries and they have

0:27:33.400 --> 0:27:35.800
<v Speaker 1>great risk. If you don't know that, maybe our system

0:27:35.840 --> 0:27:37.280
<v Speaker 1>will worked out. Well. We're not saying it's gonna go

0:27:37.359 --> 0:27:40.240
<v Speaker 1>up or down. We're just saying that that's what you're buying.

0:27:40.560 --> 0:27:43.000
<v Speaker 1>There's nothing, there's no weird action in it, there's no derivatives,

0:27:43.000 --> 0:27:45.480
<v Speaker 1>there's no hidden costs. It is what it is. Yeah,

0:27:45.480 --> 0:27:47.159
<v Speaker 1>I would totally agree with the green light on this,

0:27:47.560 --> 0:27:50.520
<v Speaker 1>but I would caution all your listeners to know when

0:27:50.560 --> 0:27:53.000
<v Speaker 1>you take bonds and put them into an ETF, you

0:27:53.119 --> 0:27:55.520
<v Speaker 1>lose one of the most important covenants of a bond,

0:27:55.600 --> 0:27:58.240
<v Speaker 1>which is a maturity date, a date when you get

0:27:58.280 --> 0:28:01.040
<v Speaker 1>your money back. That doesn't happen in in T L T.

0:28:01.600 --> 0:28:05.720
<v Speaker 1>It is perpetually extending that maturity. And because of that,

0:28:06.080 --> 0:28:08.600
<v Speaker 1>understand that although you're gonna get returns like a bond,

0:28:09.040 --> 0:28:12.399
<v Speaker 1>you're not guaranteed to get your money back someday. Okay,

0:28:12.480 --> 0:28:17.000
<v Speaker 1>bottom line, Mike, how should the average person approach hedging?

0:28:17.920 --> 0:28:21.800
<v Speaker 1>So bottom line, don't try and time it. Be aware

0:28:21.880 --> 0:28:25.280
<v Speaker 1>that time in matters way more than timing time in time.

0:28:25.359 --> 0:28:29.560
<v Speaker 1>In the longer you're in, the less it matters about hedging. Right,

0:28:29.680 --> 0:28:33.359
<v Speaker 1>So I love this idea of having some sh V

0:28:33.600 --> 0:28:36.320
<v Speaker 1>or some cash of some alternative like assets like a

0:28:36.960 --> 0:28:39.520
<v Speaker 1>g l D or a bar. All of those things

0:28:39.640 --> 0:28:42.920
<v Speaker 1>matter over the long time, but in the short time,

0:28:43.840 --> 0:28:46.640
<v Speaker 1>don't freak out. Right, if you have the right plan,

0:28:46.720 --> 0:28:49.160
<v Speaker 1>everything will be fine. In other words, the ultimate hedge

0:28:49.200 --> 0:28:52.720
<v Speaker 1>is patients. I love that. What's your favorite ticker? Well,

0:28:52.760 --> 0:28:56.440
<v Speaker 1>I have to go with my own, so cheating, Well,

0:28:56.960 --> 0:29:00.680
<v Speaker 1>it's t t F right, So as E t F

0:29:00.880 --> 0:29:02.720
<v Speaker 1>T E t F it is the E t F

0:29:02.840 --> 0:29:04.800
<v Speaker 1>that tracks the growth of the E t F industry.

0:29:05.080 --> 0:29:09.800
<v Speaker 1>That's the ticker should have been meta, Yeah, you know what,

0:29:09.960 --> 0:29:13.440
<v Speaker 1>we might change it, so I uh We've talked about

0:29:13.440 --> 0:29:18.320
<v Speaker 1>the cyril metaphor before. I think and actually this was Eric.

0:29:19.760 --> 0:29:23.360
<v Speaker 1>I think you are we're all done eating the cereal.

0:29:23.920 --> 0:29:26.800
<v Speaker 1>You're the milk, the cereal milk at the bottom of

0:29:26.880 --> 0:29:29.640
<v Speaker 1>the bowl. I don't know that I ever want to

0:29:29.680 --> 0:29:32.440
<v Speaker 1>come up with that analogy. Um, you're welcome, But you

0:29:32.520 --> 0:29:35.240
<v Speaker 1>know it's it's pretty straightforward and simple. We wanted to

0:29:35.320 --> 0:29:37.800
<v Speaker 1>know all about the ETFs. In order to know about them,

0:29:37.840 --> 0:29:39.920
<v Speaker 1>you have to know about the industry for creating them.

0:29:40.080 --> 0:29:43.520
<v Speaker 1>So we created an index and it certainly does a

0:29:43.600 --> 0:29:46.360
<v Speaker 1>lot better than the financials alone. You know what I

0:29:46.400 --> 0:29:48.440
<v Speaker 1>like about t e t F not to like plug Mike,

0:29:48.560 --> 0:29:51.040
<v Speaker 1>but the the stocks at hold. It's like black Rock

0:29:51.080 --> 0:29:53.880
<v Speaker 1>States treat the index makers. So here you have an

0:29:53.920 --> 0:29:58.600
<v Speaker 1>index that's essentially most of the passive companies X the

0:29:58.720 --> 0:30:01.280
<v Speaker 1>ones that are all in no active and so I

0:30:01.360 --> 0:30:04.680
<v Speaker 1>think some of that active as the trend continues, could

0:30:04.720 --> 0:30:06.960
<v Speaker 1>weigh those down. So it's an interesting e t F

0:30:07.120 --> 0:30:09.640
<v Speaker 1>that I think some people are confused by. They think

0:30:09.680 --> 0:30:11.120
<v Speaker 1>it's an ETF that holds other e t s, but

0:30:11.200 --> 0:30:13.800
<v Speaker 1>it actually just it's basically like the passive side of

0:30:13.840 --> 0:30:18.480
<v Speaker 1>the financials. And next Mike, it's been a pleasure talking hedging,

0:30:18.960 --> 0:30:22.920
<v Speaker 1>Biff Manure and Eric's amazing high school jail with you.

0:30:24.280 --> 0:30:26.680
<v Speaker 1>This has been an experience I won't soon forget. Thank

0:30:26.760 --> 0:30:29.760
<v Speaker 1>you for having me. I guess that's good time. Yeah, no,

0:30:29.960 --> 0:30:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Mike had no ideas anymore. Thanks for listening New Trillions

0:30:35.080 --> 0:30:37.480
<v Speaker 1>until next time. You can find us on the Bloomberg Terminal,

0:30:37.720 --> 0:30:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com, Apple Podcast, pocket Cast, and a bunch

0:30:41.720 --> 0:30:44.560
<v Speaker 1>of other places I probably haven't heard about yet. We'd

0:30:44.560 --> 0:30:46.920
<v Speaker 1>love to hear from you on Twitter. I'm at Joel

0:30:46.960 --> 0:30:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Webber Show, Eric's at Eric Baltunas, Mike's at Michael Underscore.

0:30:54.200 --> 0:30:59.760
<v Speaker 1>The Noodoh with an E. Trillions is produced by Magnus Hendrickson.

0:31:00.280 --> 0:31:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Francesca Levie is the head of Bloomberg podcast Pipe