WEBVTT - Elon Musk Call Was Reminiscent Of The 2001 Enron Call: Johnson

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg P and L Podcast. I'm Pim Fox.

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Abramowitz. Each day we

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether you're at the grocery store

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg P M L

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot Com. Tesla

0:00:33.479 --> 0:00:37.839
<v Speaker 1>Automobiles they do not burn fossil fuel. Tesla, the company

0:00:38.000 --> 0:00:40.000
<v Speaker 1>burns a lot of cash. Here to tell us more

0:00:40.000 --> 0:00:44.519
<v Speaker 1>about the company is Gordon Johnson, Managing Director, Alternative Energy, Metals,

0:00:44.720 --> 0:00:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Mining and Equipment Analyst for Vertical Group. Gordon Johnson, always

0:00:49.040 --> 0:00:51.959
<v Speaker 1>a pleasure. You were listening into the call yesterday. Why

0:00:51.960 --> 0:00:54.920
<v Speaker 1>don't you share with our listeners what you heard and

0:00:54.960 --> 0:00:57.400
<v Speaker 1>what you took away from it? Yeah, I mean, so

0:00:57.440 --> 0:01:00.880
<v Speaker 1>what we heard on the call um UM, Surprisingly, I

0:01:00.920 --> 0:01:03.960
<v Speaker 1>think not just to us, but many was a very

0:01:04.000 --> 0:01:09.040
<v Speaker 1>defensive um management team from Tesla, specifically Elon Musk. And

0:01:09.080 --> 0:01:11.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, historically they've been very open to taking questions,

0:01:11.760 --> 0:01:14.959
<v Speaker 1>and it seems like very important questions with respect to

0:01:15.760 --> 0:01:20.840
<v Speaker 1>surprisingly low April Model three deliveries. UM, what's going on

0:01:20.920 --> 0:01:24.000
<v Speaker 1>with the deposits on the Model three given U the

0:01:24.080 --> 0:01:28.160
<v Speaker 1>cars have been delayed significantly. UM. Questions around these items

0:01:28.160 --> 0:01:32.160
<v Speaker 1>were essentially deemed boring UM, and they turned it over

0:01:32.240 --> 0:01:35.600
<v Speaker 1>to a YouTube blogger UM who says he owns fifty

0:01:35.600 --> 0:01:39.480
<v Speaker 1>four shares UM. So when you're shutting UH analysts from

0:01:39.520 --> 0:01:44.480
<v Speaker 1>the institutions that you are heavily relying on and heavily

0:01:44.520 --> 0:01:47.880
<v Speaker 1>rely on to do your business, it's it's very concerning.

0:01:48.120 --> 0:01:50.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's reminiscent to us of you know, in

0:01:50.640 --> 0:01:53.080
<v Speaker 1>the second quarter of two thousand one when Jeff skilling

0:01:53.560 --> 0:01:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Um called an analyst on our areas call Um, when

0:01:57.520 --> 0:01:59.080
<v Speaker 1>the stock was at fifty five and by the end

0:01:59.120 --> 0:02:01.320
<v Speaker 1>of the year was at nine. Not we're not saying

0:02:01.360 --> 0:02:04.360
<v Speaker 1>Tesla is in ron, but we are saying that this

0:02:04.480 --> 0:02:09.040
<v Speaker 1>is a definite shift in tone from from management at

0:02:09.080 --> 0:02:13.440
<v Speaker 1>at Tesla. So Gordon, given given that shift, why aren't

0:02:13.440 --> 0:02:17.400
<v Speaker 1>the shares of Tesla down more? They're down more than six, yes,

0:02:18.200 --> 0:02:20.960
<v Speaker 1>but still somewhat elevated. If you really think that that

0:02:21.080 --> 0:02:24.240
<v Speaker 1>this is about to collapse, yeah, I mean it's because

0:02:24.320 --> 0:02:28.480
<v Speaker 1>you have literally this is this is not a you know,

0:02:28.520 --> 0:02:32.560
<v Speaker 1>an analysis type of stock or fundamentals based stock. It's

0:02:32.600 --> 0:02:35.799
<v Speaker 1>literally a faith based stock. It's almost a religion um.

0:02:35.880 --> 0:02:37.560
<v Speaker 1>And I think that a lot of the holders know.

0:02:37.600 --> 0:02:40.600
<v Speaker 1>If you look at the proxy statement of Tesla, you'll

0:02:40.639 --> 0:02:44.000
<v Speaker 1>see that Elon Musk is predds thirteen million shares of

0:02:44.080 --> 0:02:48.040
<v Speaker 1>stock for different debts that the company has. So we

0:02:48.080 --> 0:02:52.120
<v Speaker 1>don't know exactly what the key levers are to call that.

0:02:52.280 --> 0:02:55.440
<v Speaker 1>You know the essentially when that stock will be called.

0:02:55.840 --> 0:02:58.400
<v Speaker 1>But you know if this stock drops to a certain level,

0:02:58.480 --> 0:03:01.720
<v Speaker 1>it's going to accelerate down. As you know, the death

0:03:01.760 --> 0:03:05.760
<v Speaker 1>holders um essentially forced Elon Musk to sell stock to

0:03:05.760 --> 0:03:08.240
<v Speaker 1>to cover those debts. Okay, so let's talk about the

0:03:08.280 --> 0:03:11.600
<v Speaker 1>death holders and the capital raise that Elon Musk says

0:03:11.639 --> 0:03:14.480
<v Speaker 1>that he doesn't need to do. He said that they're

0:03:14.520 --> 0:03:17.680
<v Speaker 1>going to stop burning cash later this year and start

0:03:17.720 --> 0:03:22.639
<v Speaker 1>turning a profit. Um. How much credibility is there at

0:03:22.639 --> 0:03:25.600
<v Speaker 1>this point with those pledges And is it true that

0:03:25.680 --> 0:03:27.560
<v Speaker 1>you think that he won't need to raise capital again

0:03:27.600 --> 0:03:31.160
<v Speaker 1>in the next time? I don't know nine months. Let's

0:03:31.240 --> 0:03:34.440
<v Speaker 1>raise the facts, right, they burnt over a billion dollars

0:03:34.440 --> 0:03:36.880
<v Speaker 1>of free cash. The cash balance dropped by nearly a

0:03:36.880 --> 0:03:40.200
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars in a quarter. This is the third largest

0:03:40.280 --> 0:03:43.480
<v Speaker 1>cash burn free cash flow cash burn in any single quarter.

0:03:43.880 --> 0:03:46.320
<v Speaker 1>I want to be clear here, Elon Musk is saying

0:03:46.360 --> 0:03:49.040
<v Speaker 1>that he is not and will not raise equity. He

0:03:49.080 --> 0:03:51.920
<v Speaker 1>has said that before you go back to fifteen, he

0:03:51.960 --> 0:03:54.720
<v Speaker 1>said the company will never need to raise equity again.

0:03:54.800 --> 0:03:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Since then, I think they've done in six to seven times.

0:03:58.280 --> 0:04:00.680
<v Speaker 1>We think they will need to raise and let me

0:04:00.720 --> 0:04:03.040
<v Speaker 1>be more specific, we think they're gonna do it this quarter,

0:04:03.200 --> 0:04:05.800
<v Speaker 1>which means over the next two months. Is it gonna

0:04:05.840 --> 0:04:07.880
<v Speaker 1>be equity? I'm sorry, we think they need to raise capital.

0:04:07.920 --> 0:04:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Is it gonna be equity? Is gonna be dead? We

0:04:09.240 --> 0:04:11.520
<v Speaker 1>don't know, but we do think they need to raise

0:04:11.600 --> 0:04:14.000
<v Speaker 1>capital if they're going to hit their uh, you know,

0:04:14.040 --> 0:04:17.280
<v Speaker 1>production plans um And that's where we stand, and that's

0:04:17.320 --> 0:04:19.880
<v Speaker 1>what our analysis suggests, and we stand by that. This

0:04:19.960 --> 0:04:22.880
<v Speaker 1>quarter affirms that not not not not pushing us further

0:04:22.920 --> 0:04:26.160
<v Speaker 1>away from that. Gordon, what are some of the specific

0:04:26.320 --> 0:04:29.120
<v Speaker 1>issues that the Tesla has to deal with in order

0:04:29.160 --> 0:04:31.640
<v Speaker 1>to let's say, get this model three out the door

0:04:31.880 --> 0:04:36.040
<v Speaker 1>and onto onto the road. Yeah, so if you look

0:04:36.040 --> 0:04:38.400
<v Speaker 1>at the electric which is very well respected, they're saying

0:04:38.440 --> 0:04:41.960
<v Speaker 1>the giga factor is only complete UM. If you look

0:04:42.040 --> 0:04:45.600
<v Speaker 1>at some of the care downs that respected UM auto

0:04:45.720 --> 0:04:48.200
<v Speaker 1>analysts have done, and these these on sell side analysts,

0:04:48.360 --> 0:04:51.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, financialists, these are these are engineers. Uh. They

0:04:51.160 --> 0:04:55.000
<v Speaker 1>said that the Model three has been built very um UH.

0:04:55.200 --> 0:04:57.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to use their word poorly, but certain

0:04:57.839 --> 0:05:01.520
<v Speaker 1>items and certain key steps have and skipped. So think

0:05:01.520 --> 0:05:05.039
<v Speaker 1>about this, Kim, right you have Tessa said that you

0:05:05.120 --> 0:05:09.640
<v Speaker 1>hate Model three Model threes that have been produced in

0:05:09.680 --> 0:05:12.360
<v Speaker 1>the first half of April UM and they said there

0:05:12.360 --> 0:05:16.320
<v Speaker 1>were two thousand Model threes in transit, so that's roughly

0:05:16.360 --> 0:05:20.440
<v Speaker 1>six thousand Model threes. Yet inside EVS is saying they

0:05:20.480 --> 0:05:25.159
<v Speaker 1>only delivered fifty. So and then if you use the

0:05:25.160 --> 0:05:27.760
<v Speaker 1>Brewer numbers the which they tracked the VIN numbers for

0:05:27.839 --> 0:05:30.200
<v Speaker 1>the Model threes, there was ten thousand produced in April.

0:05:30.839 --> 0:05:34.000
<v Speaker 1>So it looks like there's thousands of Model threes sitting

0:05:34.000 --> 0:05:36.920
<v Speaker 1>out there that either are in transit to be the Lute,

0:05:36.960 --> 0:05:39.400
<v Speaker 1>which it doesn't take long to deliver these cars, that's

0:05:39.440 --> 0:05:42.640
<v Speaker 1>one option, or you know they have issues. I either

0:05:42.720 --> 0:05:45.240
<v Speaker 1>have been poorly constructed and they're still waiting to be

0:05:45.279 --> 0:05:48.680
<v Speaker 1>finalized so they're not really produced UM, or they're just

0:05:48.720 --> 0:05:52.720
<v Speaker 1>sitting in inventory. Um either three of those scenarios is scary.

0:05:52.839 --> 0:05:55.279
<v Speaker 1>So to your question, what needs to be done, Uh,

0:05:55.320 --> 0:05:57.120
<v Speaker 1>it seems like quite a bit needs to be done.

0:05:57.240 --> 0:05:59.320
<v Speaker 1>And we need to get more color on these production

0:05:59.400 --> 0:06:02.159
<v Speaker 1>numbers that they're pitting out there, because the deliveries numbers

0:06:02.160 --> 0:06:04.440
<v Speaker 1>from inside EVS And keep in mind this this is

0:06:04.440 --> 0:06:07.440
<v Speaker 1>a third party um U analytical company, but you know,

0:06:07.600 --> 0:06:10.520
<v Speaker 1>very well respected, a very spot on so far over

0:06:10.520 --> 0:06:13.360
<v Speaker 1>the years with the sector Tesla deliveries on a monthly basis. Uh,

0:06:13.600 --> 0:06:16.359
<v Speaker 1>they don't match up with Tesla's production numbers. So what

0:06:16.400 --> 0:06:18.120
<v Speaker 1>do they need to do? Probably spend a lot more

0:06:18.160 --> 0:06:21.839
<v Speaker 1>CAPEX to get their production facilities up to snuff UM

0:06:22.279 --> 0:06:24.240
<v Speaker 1>And that's clearly not what the company is indicating. They

0:06:24.279 --> 0:06:26.440
<v Speaker 1>actually cut their cap X numbers. Well if they don't

0:06:26.480 --> 0:06:29.960
<v Speaker 1>have the capital to expand. Gordon Johnson, thank you so

0:06:30.040 --> 0:06:33.360
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us today. Gordon Johnson is Managing director,

0:06:33.560 --> 0:06:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Alternative Energy, Metals, Mining and Equipment Analyst at Vertical Group

0:06:37.880 --> 0:06:41.200
<v Speaker 1>in New York. Uh some strong words that the call

0:06:41.400 --> 0:06:44.839
<v Speaker 1>yesterday that Ellen Musk held with investors reminded him after

0:06:44.960 --> 0:06:48.520
<v Speaker 1>the two thousand and one n RON call, and that

0:06:48.600 --> 0:06:51.559
<v Speaker 1>Tesla would have to raise capital within the next few

0:06:51.600 --> 0:06:53.680
<v Speaker 1>months in order to keep going. We will keep an

0:06:53.720 --> 0:06:56.040
<v Speaker 1>eye on the shares which are down about six and

0:06:56.040 --> 0:07:13.480
<v Speaker 1>a half percent right now. Bermuda is an economy that

0:07:13.560 --> 0:07:16.800
<v Speaker 1>depends heavily on tourism from the United States as well

0:07:16.840 --> 0:07:19.520
<v Speaker 1>as its desk as it's a it's a well known

0:07:20.120 --> 0:07:23.600
<v Speaker 1>profile of being a destination for businesses. Here to talk

0:07:23.720 --> 0:07:27.320
<v Speaker 1>about the nation is the Honorable David Burt, Premier of

0:07:27.480 --> 0:07:31.080
<v Speaker 1>the Government of Bermuda. He is the youngest ever he

0:07:31.160 --> 0:07:33.320
<v Speaker 1>joins us now he is thirty eight years old. You

0:07:33.360 --> 0:07:37.720
<v Speaker 1>went to George Washington University UH and graduated with a

0:07:37.760 --> 0:07:40.600
<v Speaker 1>business degree, and so I want to talk with you.

0:07:40.280 --> 0:07:43.040
<v Speaker 1>You've been in the position for about nine months now.

0:07:43.200 --> 0:07:47.200
<v Speaker 1>SMP just upgraded UH. The outlook to for Bermuda to

0:07:47.480 --> 0:07:50.680
<v Speaker 1>UH positive outlook. What do you see as the main

0:07:50.760 --> 0:07:54.280
<v Speaker 1>challenge going forward in the near term for Bermuda. Oh, well,

0:07:54.320 --> 0:07:57.080
<v Speaker 1>good morning, it's Elie saying good morning. It's him a

0:07:57.080 --> 0:07:59.640
<v Speaker 1>good morning to your listening audience. I mean, the challenge

0:07:59.640 --> 0:08:02.840
<v Speaker 1>for Uda is to translate what we've done well for

0:08:02.880 --> 0:08:06.040
<v Speaker 1>so long into a new future and what that world

0:08:06.040 --> 0:08:08.360
<v Speaker 1>will look like. So Bermuda has always been a center

0:08:08.400 --> 0:08:11.480
<v Speaker 1>of innovation and the reason for our success in the

0:08:11.520 --> 0:08:15.200
<v Speaker 1>insurance spaces that we were able to bring together regulators,

0:08:15.200 --> 0:08:18.680
<v Speaker 1>the lawmakers and the business sector to figure out regulation

0:08:18.720 --> 0:08:20.840
<v Speaker 1>that was smart and that could work and that could

0:08:20.960 --> 0:08:24.440
<v Speaker 1>allow industries to grow. And so from that perspective, our

0:08:24.520 --> 0:08:28.760
<v Speaker 1>challenges to translate that into new areas of the economy

0:08:28.880 --> 0:08:31.240
<v Speaker 1>and our the global economy. So whether or not that's

0:08:31.280 --> 0:08:33.840
<v Speaker 1>dealing um in the space of digital assets, or whether

0:08:33.840 --> 0:08:36.160
<v Speaker 1>that's dealing in the space of how we're going to

0:08:36.200 --> 0:08:39.160
<v Speaker 1>look to play a role in what the global economy

0:08:39.160 --> 0:08:42.160
<v Speaker 1>will be, that's what Bermuda and that's how Bermuda is

0:08:42.160 --> 0:08:45.360
<v Speaker 1>trying to position itself. Speak if you can about the

0:08:45.400 --> 0:08:50.440
<v Speaker 1>actual structure of Bermuda. It is a British overseas territories.

0:08:51.160 --> 0:08:54.720
<v Speaker 1>What does that mean in terms of its governance, its

0:08:54.840 --> 0:08:59.120
<v Speaker 1>laws and its relationship with the United Kingdom. Bermuda as

0:08:59.200 --> 0:09:02.520
<v Speaker 1>a over these territory, we have the most advanced constitution

0:09:02.559 --> 0:09:05.199
<v Speaker 1>out of all the United Kingdom overseas territories and it's

0:09:05.200 --> 0:09:08.400
<v Speaker 1>a constitution of which we're actually celebrating our fiftieth and

0:09:08.440 --> 0:09:12.080
<v Speaker 1>adversary ever, thank you very much this year, actually this

0:09:12.160 --> 0:09:17.000
<v Speaker 1>month uh to be precise. But what our relation is

0:09:17.040 --> 0:09:19.280
<v Speaker 1>that we have full internal self government. So we make

0:09:19.320 --> 0:09:20.680
<v Speaker 1>all of our own laws and we set all of

0:09:20.679 --> 0:09:23.680
<v Speaker 1>our own procedures, and the United Kingdom is responsible for

0:09:24.120 --> 0:09:29.520
<v Speaker 1>internal security, UM, external affairs and defense. Okay, I'm wondering

0:09:29.600 --> 0:09:33.000
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about how insurance companies and other businesses have

0:09:33.040 --> 0:09:36.720
<v Speaker 1>gravitated to the territory. I want to talk about a

0:09:36.880 --> 0:09:40.240
<v Speaker 1>new UK law that will go into effect I believe

0:09:40.600 --> 0:09:44.520
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty that will force UH different companies to

0:09:44.559 --> 0:09:47.360
<v Speaker 1>disclose where they file their taxes. That might butchering this,

0:09:47.440 --> 0:09:50.880
<v Speaker 1>but basically people are concerned that this will give less

0:09:50.880 --> 0:09:53.960
<v Speaker 1>of a benefit to certain corporations who file in Bermuda.

0:09:54.240 --> 0:09:56.240
<v Speaker 1>What's your take on this and can you please, you know,

0:09:56.440 --> 0:09:59.360
<v Speaker 1>give it more detailed. How I'm then what I just

0:09:59.400 --> 0:10:02.240
<v Speaker 1>tried to do, No problem, I'll be I'll be happy

0:10:02.280 --> 0:10:05.600
<v Speaker 1>to do that. Let me start by saying that uh

0:10:05.640 --> 0:10:08.800
<v Speaker 1>in from the Bermuda perspective, we make our own laws.

0:10:08.960 --> 0:10:11.920
<v Speaker 1>And so for the first time in the fifty years

0:10:11.960 --> 0:10:14.680
<v Speaker 1>that we've seen an internal squabble which is taking place

0:10:14.720 --> 0:10:17.200
<v Speaker 1>the United Kingdom get to a point where there was

0:10:17.240 --> 0:10:19.839
<v Speaker 1>an amendment that was passed to a bill where the

0:10:20.200 --> 0:10:23.480
<v Speaker 1>parliament seems to think that it can pass laws for

0:10:23.640 --> 0:10:26.920
<v Speaker 1>people that don't have representation inside their parliament. So that

0:10:27.080 --> 0:10:29.920
<v Speaker 1>is a completely separate issue and that's something that UM

0:10:29.960 --> 0:10:33.720
<v Speaker 1>I think UM is unfortunate. But in from the Bermuda perspective,

0:10:33.760 --> 0:10:36.360
<v Speaker 1>we do not recognize the right of the United Kingdoms

0:10:36.360 --> 0:10:39.079
<v Speaker 1>who set um our laws because we have full internal

0:10:39.080 --> 0:10:41.559
<v Speaker 1>self government and the only thing the United Kingdom actually

0:10:41.600 --> 0:10:46.600
<v Speaker 1>has responsibility for his external affairs internal security and defense. However,

0:10:47.280 --> 0:10:49.800
<v Speaker 1>because I don't want to conflate the issues, what they

0:10:49.800 --> 0:10:52.400
<v Speaker 1>had spoken about was an issue of having a public

0:10:52.559 --> 0:10:56.400
<v Speaker 1>register of beneficial owners of companies, which is not the

0:10:56.440 --> 0:11:00.560
<v Speaker 1>global standard of which exists. Bermuda has, unlike many countries,

0:11:00.600 --> 0:11:04.360
<v Speaker 1>for over seventy years, had a central register of beneficial ownership,

0:11:04.600 --> 0:11:07.160
<v Speaker 1>so we know all the persons who owned the companies

0:11:07.200 --> 0:11:09.920
<v Speaker 1>that are registered in Bermuda. And what we also have

0:11:10.160 --> 0:11:12.439
<v Speaker 1>is that we are we are compliant with the international

0:11:12.480 --> 0:11:14.319
<v Speaker 1>standards which is set by the o E c D

0:11:14.720 --> 0:11:18.360
<v Speaker 1>of making sure that we exchange that information UM with

0:11:18.960 --> 0:11:21.840
<v Speaker 1>authorities UM around the world who are looking to get that.

0:11:22.080 --> 0:11:25.319
<v Speaker 1>So Bermuda has has led the charge. We are one

0:11:25.320 --> 0:11:29.360
<v Speaker 1>of the leaders UM in international tax transparency and compliant.

0:11:29.440 --> 0:11:31.760
<v Speaker 1>So we are the first overseas territory to have an

0:11:31.800 --> 0:11:35.040
<v Speaker 1>agreement with Her Majesty's Revenue Customs in the UK and

0:11:35.080 --> 0:11:37.280
<v Speaker 1>the first overseas territory to have an agreement with the

0:11:37.400 --> 0:11:41.280
<v Speaker 1>U s UM Internal Revenue Service here UM in uh

0:11:41.320 --> 0:11:44.640
<v Speaker 1>IN in the United States. So we UM have led

0:11:44.640 --> 0:11:46.840
<v Speaker 1>the space in this charge. But Bermuda is not a

0:11:46.880 --> 0:11:49.960
<v Speaker 1>tax play. Bermuda is a regulatory play as well, and

0:11:50.000 --> 0:11:52.640
<v Speaker 1>so what you see for the insurance companies, A lot

0:11:52.640 --> 0:11:55.760
<v Speaker 1>of the insurance companies that are actually in Bermuda UM

0:11:55.800 --> 0:11:58.600
<v Speaker 1>have taken a eight to get too technical, a nine

0:11:58.679 --> 0:12:02.000
<v Speaker 1>fifty three election on their UM tax return. So they

0:12:02.040 --> 0:12:06.000
<v Speaker 1>actually file taxes as a US taxpayer, but they're in

0:12:06.080 --> 0:12:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Bermuda because we have a unique regulatory environment that allows

0:12:10.400 --> 0:12:12.800
<v Speaker 1>us too, that allows them to deal with one regulator

0:12:12.960 --> 0:12:15.600
<v Speaker 1>to access insurance markets the United States as opposed to

0:12:15.640 --> 0:12:17.880
<v Speaker 1>the fifty different regulators that are in all of these

0:12:17.880 --> 0:12:20.760
<v Speaker 1>states here in the US. I wish we had more

0:12:20.760 --> 0:12:22.319
<v Speaker 1>time because the one question I want to ask you

0:12:22.400 --> 0:12:24.000
<v Speaker 1>has to do with same sex marriage. I don't like,

0:12:24.040 --> 0:12:26.400
<v Speaker 1>can you do that in twenty seconds? What's the status

0:12:26.480 --> 0:12:29.679
<v Speaker 1>UM I'm perfectly happy to discuss that. Bermuda. We uh,

0:12:29.960 --> 0:12:33.719
<v Speaker 1>we are the first UK Overseas Caribbean UK overseas territory

0:12:33.800 --> 0:12:36.920
<v Speaker 1>to give full legal recognition to same sex couples. It

0:12:37.040 --> 0:12:39.960
<v Speaker 1>is something that did not exist in Bermuda before our

0:12:40.000 --> 0:12:43.360
<v Speaker 1>government passed it and we are welcoming to all persons

0:12:43.720 --> 0:12:46.080
<v Speaker 1>on our shores. We are proud of the records which

0:12:46.080 --> 0:12:48.680
<v Speaker 1>we have. Uh. If you want to say five years

0:12:48.720 --> 0:12:51.839
<v Speaker 1>ago there was nothing, but now we recognize um all

0:12:51.920 --> 0:12:54.360
<v Speaker 1>same sex couples. Thank you very much for being with us.

0:12:54.480 --> 0:12:57.440
<v Speaker 1>The Premier Bermuda, David Burt, thank you very much. And

0:12:57.520 --> 0:13:02.800
<v Speaker 1>the happy birthday and congratulations on the constitution anniversary. Absolutely,

0:13:02.800 --> 0:13:21.480
<v Speaker 1>thank you Bermuda, much appreciated. Amazon just has to hint

0:13:21.600 --> 0:13:23.960
<v Speaker 1>that it is thinking of getting into an industry to

0:13:24.040 --> 0:13:28.280
<v Speaker 1>scare shareholders away from all potential competitors in that sector.

0:13:28.320 --> 0:13:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Here to talk about the skirmish that happened yesterday in

0:13:31.240 --> 0:13:35.040
<v Speaker 1>the payments sector is David Ritter, Payments and specialty finance

0:13:35.040 --> 0:13:38.000
<v Speaker 1>analyst with Bloomberg Intelligence. Dave, thank you so much for

0:13:38.040 --> 0:13:42.440
<v Speaker 1>being with us. Bloomberg News reported that Amazon said that

0:13:42.480 --> 0:13:46.960
<v Speaker 1>it was more aggressively getting into payments processing to compete

0:13:46.960 --> 0:13:50.760
<v Speaker 1>with the likes of PayPal, Visa, MasterCard, Square. There was

0:13:50.760 --> 0:13:53.280
<v Speaker 1>a fierce reaction tell us, what is Amazon exactly thinking

0:13:53.320 --> 0:13:56.000
<v Speaker 1>of doing? Well, it's interesting. I mean, this is a

0:13:56.120 --> 0:13:59.920
<v Speaker 1>topic that I've written about, actually going back many months,

0:14:00.000 --> 0:14:04.400
<v Speaker 1>the possibility that uh, they might decide to sharply cut

0:14:04.440 --> 0:14:08.520
<v Speaker 1>their rates to and sent merchants to accept their Amazon

0:14:08.640 --> 0:14:12.199
<v Speaker 1>Pay service. So, I mean, just think about it. Between

0:14:12.200 --> 0:14:14.920
<v Speaker 1>what are the two hundred million Prime users now, so

0:14:15.080 --> 0:14:19.080
<v Speaker 1>that's two hundred million stored payment credentials plus non Prime

0:14:19.200 --> 0:14:22.880
<v Speaker 1>users have their payment credentials stored there. But the challenge

0:14:22.960 --> 0:14:25.800
<v Speaker 1>has been you know, Amazon has been trying to crack

0:14:25.920 --> 0:14:29.920
<v Speaker 1>this market for many years, and the difficulty that they

0:14:29.960 --> 0:14:34.880
<v Speaker 1>have is number one. Obviously, they sell merchandise themselves, so

0:14:34.920 --> 0:14:38.400
<v Speaker 1>they're competing against merchants. And you know, ever since paypals

0:14:38.400 --> 0:14:42.520
<v Speaker 1>split away from eBay, uh, their growth has accelerated because

0:14:42.520 --> 0:14:46.240
<v Speaker 1>that concern that merchants had by doing business with PayPal

0:14:46.560 --> 0:14:50.360
<v Speaker 1>has gone away. So, I mean, I think the reaction

0:14:50.480 --> 0:14:53.320
<v Speaker 1>is overdone. I mean, I feel PayPal has been beating

0:14:53.320 --> 0:14:57.000
<v Speaker 1>back all competitors and its growth has been accelerating in

0:14:57.040 --> 0:15:01.920
<v Speaker 1>recent years. Of anything David, can you explain this sort

0:15:01.920 --> 0:15:05.880
<v Speaker 1>of the finances behind doing this. Let's say that someone

0:15:05.920 --> 0:15:09.800
<v Speaker 1>listening is a producer of a product and they wish

0:15:09.880 --> 0:15:13.280
<v Speaker 1>to sell it through Amazon. How much does it cost

0:15:13.400 --> 0:15:18.400
<v Speaker 1>for Amazon to take care of the transaction? Yeah? Amazon,

0:15:18.720 --> 0:15:21.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, they don't publish their specific cost, but you

0:15:21.520 --> 0:15:24.760
<v Speaker 1>can assume just like any other very large merchant like

0:15:24.920 --> 0:15:29.280
<v Speaker 1>Walmart or Target for example, they are getting favorable rates

0:15:30.080 --> 0:15:33.880
<v Speaker 1>from the credit card processors to process credit and debit

0:15:33.960 --> 0:15:40.600
<v Speaker 1>card transactions on their site. So they do have that advantage. Um.

0:15:41.200 --> 0:15:43.480
<v Speaker 1>But right now, the way it works is, you know

0:15:43.520 --> 0:15:48.040
<v Speaker 1>they're going to charge a merchant, say three rate to

0:15:48.240 --> 0:15:52.360
<v Speaker 1>process and transaction, just like PayPal does. But then you

0:15:52.400 --> 0:15:55.520
<v Speaker 1>know they have to turn around. They're they're basically acting

0:15:55.720 --> 0:15:58.240
<v Speaker 1>as the merchant in that case, so they have to

0:15:58.280 --> 0:16:01.040
<v Speaker 1>turn around and pay the cost back through the payment

0:16:01.040 --> 0:16:05.040
<v Speaker 1>card network to take that transaction. So um, so they're

0:16:05.040 --> 0:16:07.280
<v Speaker 1>not making a full margin on it. And that's where

0:16:07.360 --> 0:16:11.040
<v Speaker 1>PayPal differs in one key respect is that a lot

0:16:11.040 --> 0:16:13.680
<v Speaker 1>of folks keep a balance in their PayPal account, so

0:16:14.600 --> 0:16:17.160
<v Speaker 1>you use that balance to pay, or you use your

0:16:17.440 --> 0:16:20.440
<v Speaker 1>link to checking account to pay. There's little or no

0:16:20.560 --> 0:16:23.240
<v Speaker 1>cost in that transaction to PayPal and they're making that

0:16:23.440 --> 0:16:27.160
<v Speaker 1>full margin from the merchant rate that they're charging. Okay,

0:16:27.160 --> 0:16:30.720
<v Speaker 1>well that goes that dovetails perfectly into another Amazon initiative

0:16:30.760 --> 0:16:34.560
<v Speaker 1>people have talked about, speculated frankly, that Amazon will try

0:16:34.600 --> 0:16:39.440
<v Speaker 1>to get into the customer deposits business, perhaps to compete

0:16:39.440 --> 0:16:42.320
<v Speaker 1>more directly with the PayPal on this matter. Do you

0:16:42.320 --> 0:16:47.760
<v Speaker 1>think that they can make inroads into that effect? Yeah,

0:16:47.840 --> 0:16:51.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what's really surprising is how important trust is

0:16:52.360 --> 0:16:57.160
<v Speaker 1>in this business. Um PayPal consistently ranks right up there

0:16:57.160 --> 0:17:00.960
<v Speaker 1>with major banks in terms of trust in holding their

0:17:01.000 --> 0:17:03.520
<v Speaker 1>money and handling their money, which is not something you

0:17:03.640 --> 0:17:06.040
<v Speaker 1>necessarily think would be the case. But when you've been

0:17:06.080 --> 0:17:08.600
<v Speaker 1>at it, you know, for twenty years like they have.

0:17:09.560 --> 0:17:12.040
<v Speaker 1>It sounds silly to say that's an old company, but

0:17:12.080 --> 0:17:15.520
<v Speaker 1>in the tech world it is. Um you know, they

0:17:15.720 --> 0:17:18.439
<v Speaker 1>they had that built in advantage. I'm not sure that

0:17:18.560 --> 0:17:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Amazon people think of it the same way they think

0:17:21.880 --> 0:17:25.280
<v Speaker 1>of as a neat place to buy stuff. And you know,

0:17:25.359 --> 0:17:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Amazon's pretty successfully provided a lot of financial services very

0:17:29.520 --> 0:17:32.480
<v Speaker 1>well through third parties. You know, they have a card

0:17:32.480 --> 0:17:34.560
<v Speaker 1>with Synchrony and they have a card with Chase that

0:17:34.640 --> 0:17:39.000
<v Speaker 1>pays a big five percent rebate. That's real popular. Um,

0:17:39.080 --> 0:17:41.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm not I'm not sure. And there's plenty

0:17:41.200 --> 0:17:44.919
<v Speaker 1>of ways to add cash into your Amazon account. You know,

0:17:44.960 --> 0:17:48.359
<v Speaker 1>you just go, you just go buy a prepaid card

0:17:48.440 --> 0:17:51.320
<v Speaker 1>and moad that money in. And um, you know they

0:17:51.320 --> 0:17:54.280
<v Speaker 1>have for a debit rewards program now too, So I

0:17:54.359 --> 0:17:56.359
<v Speaker 1>kind of feel like they're already doing a lot of

0:17:56.400 --> 0:17:59.879
<v Speaker 1>these things, Dave. What's been the response of Visa and MasterCard?

0:18:00.040 --> 0:18:06.159
<v Speaker 1>They gonna go the PayPal route? Uh? In terms of well,

0:18:06.200 --> 0:18:09.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, Visa and master Card have their own, um

0:18:10.080 --> 0:18:12.639
<v Speaker 1>call them alternative pay buttons that they've been trying to

0:18:12.720 --> 0:18:16.080
<v Speaker 1>push in recent years, and none of them have really

0:18:16.119 --> 0:18:18.680
<v Speaker 1>gotten any traction. And you can also throw Apple pay

0:18:18.720 --> 0:18:22.640
<v Speaker 1>and Samsung Paying, these other alternatives into the mix. Um,

0:18:22.720 --> 0:18:25.160
<v Speaker 1>at least in the US, they really struggled to gain

0:18:25.960 --> 0:18:28.720
<v Speaker 1>gain traction. Whereas you know, PayPal's got coming up on

0:18:28.760 --> 0:18:32.400
<v Speaker 1>twenty million global merchants that excepted as payment. It's really

0:18:32.440 --> 0:18:35.840
<v Speaker 1>pretty astounding. Amazon, of course, has a hundred million Prime

0:18:35.840 --> 0:18:38.359
<v Speaker 1>members though, And I want to just home in quickly

0:18:38.440 --> 0:18:41.600
<v Speaker 1>on the trust issue. Are you implying that consumers don't

0:18:41.600 --> 0:18:46.080
<v Speaker 1>trust Amazon? No, I'm not employing. They don't trust Amazon,

0:18:46.119 --> 0:18:49.720
<v Speaker 1>but it's it's one thing. If you're looking to expand

0:18:49.760 --> 0:18:53.040
<v Speaker 1>further into financial services and holding people's money, I think

0:18:53.040 --> 0:18:56.080
<v Speaker 1>you're crossing into a little bit different area than Look,

0:18:56.119 --> 0:18:58.399
<v Speaker 1>I know I'm paying for something and I'm using my

0:18:58.400 --> 0:19:00.399
<v Speaker 1>my credit card, but that credit card it is from

0:19:00.520 --> 0:19:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Chase and they're the ones providing the the actual relationship

0:19:04.200 --> 0:19:06.480
<v Speaker 1>behind that. All right, we want to leave it there,

0:19:06.480 --> 0:19:08.920
<v Speaker 1>but thanks very much for sharing this information. But it's

0:19:09.000 --> 0:19:12.159
<v Speaker 1>very interesting and Lisa, as you describe it, the Amazon effect,

0:19:12.680 --> 0:19:14.240
<v Speaker 1>all they have to do is sort of mention that

0:19:14.240 --> 0:19:16.919
<v Speaker 1>they're going to be getting into some particular industry. In

0:19:16.960 --> 0:19:20.280
<v Speaker 1>the stocks of the competitors all react. Yeah. Although it's

0:19:20.280 --> 0:19:23.280
<v Speaker 1>interesting because when I listened to Dave ritt Or, it

0:19:23.359 --> 0:19:26.159
<v Speaker 1>really I realized that perhaps this offers up some opportunities

0:19:26.160 --> 0:19:28.560
<v Speaker 1>to people who are still bullish on specific companies if

0:19:28.600 --> 0:19:31.480
<v Speaker 1>they think that the if the effect is overdone right indeed,

0:19:31.520 --> 0:19:34.440
<v Speaker 1>and taking a look at the shares of PayPal, for example,

0:19:34.960 --> 0:19:39.600
<v Speaker 1>they are down about one percent right now after falling

0:19:39.680 --> 0:19:42.679
<v Speaker 1>up more than four percent and yesterday's trading. Thanks very

0:19:42.760 --> 0:19:46.320
<v Speaker 1>much to Dave Ritter, our senior analysts for payments, financial

0:19:46.359 --> 0:20:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Technology and specialty finance or Bloomberg Intelligence. The world of

0:20:05.119 --> 0:20:09.000
<v Speaker 1>advertising changes as technology and consumers change their taste, but

0:20:09.160 --> 0:20:13.320
<v Speaker 1>some things don't change, and that's the emphasis on creativity.

0:20:13.680 --> 0:20:16.600
<v Speaker 1>John Cyford is the worldwide chairman and the chief executive

0:20:16.640 --> 0:20:19.919
<v Speaker 1>of Ogilvie and Mather. He joins US now Ogilvie and

0:20:20.000 --> 0:20:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Mather one of the many companies under the overall corporate

0:20:23.800 --> 0:20:26.440
<v Speaker 1>banner of w PP Group. John, thank you very much

0:20:26.440 --> 0:20:29.119
<v Speaker 1>for coming into the studio. Much appreciated. Could you just

0:20:29.240 --> 0:20:32.360
<v Speaker 1>give people a little sort of maybe a thirty second

0:20:32.480 --> 0:20:35.680
<v Speaker 1>history of Ogilvie and Mather because they may not recall

0:20:36.359 --> 0:20:40.080
<v Speaker 1>that they came up with the Dove soap commercial that

0:20:40.200 --> 0:20:42.439
<v Speaker 1>was kind of that was one of the hallmarks of

0:20:42.440 --> 0:20:47.200
<v Speaker 1>your agency. But the history goes back to eighteen fifty. Yeah,

0:20:47.240 --> 0:20:50.879
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's an amazing history. Um. I remember it

0:20:50.960 --> 0:20:54.920
<v Speaker 1>really in the context of that's when David Ogilvie started

0:20:55.280 --> 0:20:58.399
<v Speaker 1>Ogilvie and May there in New York. We'll celebrate our

0:20:58.400 --> 0:21:02.520
<v Speaker 1>seventieth anniversary this coming September, and uh, you know, I'm

0:21:02.520 --> 0:21:04.679
<v Speaker 1>the ninth chairman and CEO of the company. I'll be

0:21:04.720 --> 0:21:06.919
<v Speaker 1>the last one to have been mentored by all the

0:21:06.920 --> 0:21:10.359
<v Speaker 1>previous eight, including David. So it's a founder brand that

0:21:10.440 --> 0:21:14.560
<v Speaker 1>I have huge passion and heart for. In terms of background,

0:21:14.680 --> 0:21:17.200
<v Speaker 1>we've David had a list of the clients that he

0:21:17.240 --> 0:21:20.200
<v Speaker 1>wanted to work for, and uh, he pretty much ticked

0:21:20.200 --> 0:21:22.119
<v Speaker 1>off everybody on that list. He wanted to work for

0:21:22.160 --> 0:21:24.680
<v Speaker 1>the Campbell soup company, he wanted to work for Lever Brothers.

0:21:24.760 --> 0:21:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Dove has been a valued client of ours for right

0:21:28.640 --> 0:21:31.880
<v Speaker 1>from the beginning. American Expressican Express, which is a client

0:21:32.000 --> 0:21:35.040
<v Speaker 1>that I've worked with for the last thirty years. You know,

0:21:35.200 --> 0:21:39.320
<v Speaker 1>David was told that American Express was too small by

0:21:39.480 --> 0:21:42.760
<v Speaker 1>his president at the time, and David ignored that advice

0:21:42.800 --> 0:21:44.520
<v Speaker 1>and said, no, I think they're I think these people

0:21:44.520 --> 0:21:47.640
<v Speaker 1>will do something special, and they certainly did. So. There's

0:21:47.680 --> 0:21:49.760
<v Speaker 1>been a lot of changes just in the way that

0:21:49.880 --> 0:21:53.840
<v Speaker 1>people absorbed media in the past two decades. I'm wondering, Uh,

0:21:54.040 --> 0:21:56.440
<v Speaker 1>just in the past few years, what do you view

0:21:56.640 --> 0:21:59.399
<v Speaker 1>as the biggest changed for you in your business as

0:21:59.400 --> 0:22:02.080
<v Speaker 1>far as just reading the message of a brand. Well,

0:22:02.119 --> 0:22:05.800
<v Speaker 1>we call this the era era of great fragmentation. There

0:22:05.800 --> 0:22:08.639
<v Speaker 1>have been never been more ways to reach people than

0:22:08.680 --> 0:22:12.920
<v Speaker 1>ever before. Obviously, the digital revolution has ushered in all

0:22:13.040 --> 0:22:16.360
<v Speaker 1>sorts of new way ways to engage consumers, and one

0:22:16.400 --> 0:22:19.480
<v Speaker 1>of the paradoxes of all that choice is that many

0:22:19.560 --> 0:22:23.199
<v Speaker 1>of our clients are are less confident in what works.

0:22:23.960 --> 0:22:26.200
<v Speaker 1>And so we're in an era right now where there's

0:22:26.240 --> 0:22:29.480
<v Speaker 1>lots of experimentation, lots of new ways to build brands

0:22:29.560 --> 0:22:36.040
<v Speaker 1>through digital engagement, through new new media sources, through personalization,

0:22:36.240 --> 0:22:38.520
<v Speaker 1>through the big data, and how that can be applied

0:22:38.560 --> 0:22:41.439
<v Speaker 1>to customizing products just to the particular need of a

0:22:41.480 --> 0:22:44.720
<v Speaker 1>given customer. But at the same time, many clients are saying,

0:22:44.960 --> 0:22:47.520
<v Speaker 1>what's how does it all work together? How much should

0:22:47.520 --> 0:22:50.000
<v Speaker 1>I pay for it? And what's the real value that

0:22:50.000 --> 0:22:51.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to get at the end of the day.

0:22:51.600 --> 0:22:54.840
<v Speaker 1>And so it's never been more complicated to help clients

0:22:55.040 --> 0:22:59.720
<v Speaker 1>navigate this this new era. In navigating this new era,

0:22:59.840 --> 0:23:04.960
<v Speaker 1>you must also recognize that what appears on the Internet

0:23:05.720 --> 0:23:09.760
<v Speaker 1>is in no way verifiable anymore. I mean, we we

0:23:09.880 --> 0:23:12.000
<v Speaker 1>have entered the age in which we really do not

0:23:12.240 --> 0:23:14.439
<v Speaker 1>know what is behind much of the information and the

0:23:14.480 --> 0:23:16.879
<v Speaker 1>advertising that we see. We don't know who pays for it,

0:23:17.119 --> 0:23:19.480
<v Speaker 1>we don't know why we see it. All of these things.

0:23:19.960 --> 0:23:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Do you then have to reinvigorate the what we believe

0:23:23.200 --> 0:23:27.680
<v Speaker 1>and how we behave ethos of Ogilvy. In fact, I

0:23:27.720 --> 0:23:31.720
<v Speaker 1>think it's that is the only antidote we have for

0:23:31.960 --> 0:23:34.840
<v Speaker 1>what some might call this lack of transparency in terms

0:23:34.880 --> 0:23:37.879
<v Speaker 1>of of of how things show up. You have to

0:23:37.920 --> 0:23:41.520
<v Speaker 1>believe from where they come. So brand ownership and brand

0:23:41.600 --> 0:23:45.160
<v Speaker 1>trust never been more vital. And look at the social

0:23:45.320 --> 0:23:48.160
<v Speaker 1>platforms now right. You know, these are companies that were

0:23:48.200 --> 0:23:50.960
<v Speaker 1>deemed the companies of the future, the ones that we

0:23:51.000 --> 0:23:53.359
<v Speaker 1>could all believe in, because they were ushering in this

0:23:53.440 --> 0:23:57.200
<v Speaker 1>new level of engagement and openness. And yet it's never

0:23:57.280 --> 0:24:00.400
<v Speaker 1>been harder to kind of be confident that what they

0:24:00.440 --> 0:24:03.399
<v Speaker 1>represent you can count on, you can believe in. And

0:24:03.440 --> 0:24:05.439
<v Speaker 1>so it's it isn't It is an aspect of the

0:24:05.440 --> 0:24:08.119
<v Speaker 1>paradox we live in. So as you speak, I just

0:24:08.320 --> 0:24:11.760
<v Speaker 1>keep hearing Facebook, Facebook, Facebook, over and over again in

0:24:11.800 --> 0:24:14.159
<v Speaker 1>my head. I'm just wondering, have you seen any shift

0:24:14.320 --> 0:24:18.000
<v Speaker 1>in your clients away from Facebook in the wake of

0:24:18.040 --> 0:24:21.480
<v Speaker 1>the Cambridge Analytica issues. So one of my clients told

0:24:21.520 --> 0:24:24.639
<v Speaker 1>me that they were at the University of Alabama and

0:24:24.680 --> 0:24:27.879
<v Speaker 1>they asked a graduating class. So in a light of

0:24:27.920 --> 0:24:31.040
<v Speaker 1>all of these issues with Facebook, are you you know,

0:24:31.080 --> 0:24:33.480
<v Speaker 1>are you coming off Facebook and not using it? Not

0:24:33.520 --> 0:24:36.480
<v Speaker 1>a single hand went up. And so I think one

0:24:36.480 --> 0:24:39.800
<v Speaker 1>of the things that we're going to face is it

0:24:39.880 --> 0:24:43.600
<v Speaker 1>is this fundamentally going to change consumer behavior? And and

0:24:43.640 --> 0:24:45.719
<v Speaker 1>I think the jury is still out on that. I mean,

0:24:45.960 --> 0:24:49.199
<v Speaker 1>right now, these platforms are so ingrained in people's lives

0:24:49.720 --> 0:24:52.560
<v Speaker 1>that even if flawed, it's hard to give them up.

0:24:53.280 --> 0:24:56.080
<v Speaker 1>So I think we're gonna we're gonna see a much

0:24:56.119 --> 0:25:00.560
<v Speaker 1>greater emphasis on verify, verifying and and being a accountable

0:25:00.680 --> 0:25:03.800
<v Speaker 1>for both the content and the advertising of their peers

0:25:03.800 --> 0:25:07.920
<v Speaker 1>in these platforms before we see massive exodus of of consumers.

0:25:08.000 --> 0:25:09.959
<v Speaker 1>Do you believe that we're going to see a simplification

0:25:10.320 --> 0:25:14.920
<v Speaker 1>in the advertising business. I think if we don't, we're

0:25:14.920 --> 0:25:17.840
<v Speaker 1>going to have real problems. Uh, the word it is

0:25:18.119 --> 0:25:21.280
<v Speaker 1>far too complicated. And and I think one of the

0:25:21.320 --> 0:25:23.640
<v Speaker 1>things that you're going to find, whether you're talking at

0:25:23.640 --> 0:25:26.359
<v Speaker 1>a holding company level or in the marketing departments of

0:25:26.400 --> 0:25:29.719
<v Speaker 1>clients and so on, is that we have to simplify

0:25:29.880 --> 0:25:32.280
<v Speaker 1>the way we work together. You know, we just can't

0:25:32.359 --> 0:25:34.760
<v Speaker 1>keep fragmenting and assuming that this is all going to

0:25:34.880 --> 0:25:38.720
<v Speaker 1>naturally come together. Uh, it takes real leadership. If you're

0:25:38.720 --> 0:25:40.800
<v Speaker 1>in a client organization today and you're trying to manage

0:25:40.840 --> 0:25:43.520
<v Speaker 1>a brand, and in some cases these clients are managing

0:25:43.600 --> 0:25:47.280
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of brands. Um, you have to have a simplified

0:25:47.359 --> 0:25:50.880
<v Speaker 1>way of coming together, bringing the right expertise, the right information,

0:25:51.240 --> 0:25:54.360
<v Speaker 1>and ultimately the right accountability for the investment that you make.

0:25:54.720 --> 0:25:57.199
<v Speaker 1>And if we're not part of solving that problem, I

0:25:57.200 --> 0:26:00.760
<v Speaker 1>think we will we will suffer the consequences. I hear

0:26:00.840 --> 0:26:04.800
<v Speaker 1>consolidation in that. Perhaps we've got lots more to talk about.

0:26:04.960 --> 0:26:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Unfortunately we'll have to leave it until next time. John Seifert,

0:26:07.840 --> 0:26:09.800
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining us. He has worldwide

0:26:09.880 --> 0:26:13.240
<v Speaker 1>chairman and chief executive of Ogilvie and Mather, which is

0:26:13.280 --> 0:26:21.000
<v Speaker 1>based in New York. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg

0:26:21.040 --> 0:26:23.679
<v Speaker 1>P and L podcast. You can subscribe and listen to

0:26:23.720 --> 0:26:28.240
<v Speaker 1>interviews at Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whatever podcast platform you prefer.

0:26:28.640 --> 0:26:32.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at pim Fox. I'm

0:26:32.240 --> 0:26:35.560
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Lisa Abramo wits one. Before the podcast,

0:26:35.600 --> 0:26:38.200
<v Speaker 1>you can always catch us worldwide on Bloomberg Radio