WEBVTT - Episode 67: Scottsdale Putters

0:00:00.320 --> 0:00:02.320
<v Speaker 1>The guys from paying They've kind of showed me how

0:00:02.400 --> 0:00:03.840
<v Speaker 1>much the equipment matters.

0:00:04.080 --> 0:00:05.760
<v Speaker 2>I just love that I can hit any shot.

0:00:05.840 --> 0:00:07.440
<v Speaker 1>I kind of want we're gonna be able to tell

0:00:07.480 --> 0:00:09.480
<v Speaker 1>some fun stories about what goes on here to help

0:00:09.520 --> 0:00:10.600
<v Speaker 1>golfers play better golf.

0:00:11.400 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 2>Hey, everybody, welcome back to the Ping prooven Grounds podcast.

0:00:13.720 --> 0:00:16.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm Shane Bak and joined as always by Marty Jertsen.

0:00:16.200 --> 0:00:18.680
<v Speaker 2>Tony Serrano is back on the pod. Been a minute

0:00:18.680 --> 0:00:21.080
<v Speaker 2>since we've chat. It'd been a minute since the Scott

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:24.680
<v Speaker 2>Stills putters were a part of the new launch of

0:00:24.800 --> 0:00:27.560
<v Speaker 2>Ping golf Clubs. I know that's exciting for twenty twenty five, right,

0:00:28.120 --> 0:00:29.480
<v Speaker 2>It's been quite.

0:00:29.240 --> 0:00:31.240
<v Speaker 3>A few years now since we've done a scuts Sell

0:00:31.320 --> 0:00:34.279
<v Speaker 3>putter back. I think it's about ten years or so.

0:00:34.320 --> 0:00:35.839
<v Speaker 3>We did a Scott Still, then we followed up with

0:00:35.840 --> 0:00:36.640
<v Speaker 3>a Scott Still tier.

0:00:37.120 --> 0:00:38.839
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I've had one for a long time already. I

0:00:38.880 --> 0:00:40.159
<v Speaker 2>remember I had the Scott Stale in the bag for

0:00:40.200 --> 0:00:42.960
<v Speaker 2>a long time, kind of answer style and it you

0:00:42.960 --> 0:00:46.080
<v Speaker 2>remember the adjustable shafts, remember that run back in the day.

0:00:46.560 --> 0:00:48.320
<v Speaker 2>I had that thing in there forever. I mean, I

0:00:48.360 --> 0:00:50.320
<v Speaker 2>think I probably played my Scott Still I think it

0:00:50.400 --> 0:00:52.720
<v Speaker 2>might have been the original run of them had in

0:00:52.720 --> 0:00:54.320
<v Speaker 2>the bag for four or five years, so I was

0:00:54.360 --> 0:00:55.880
<v Speaker 2>excited to hear the returns here.

0:00:56.200 --> 0:00:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think this family has some similarities. I mean,

0:00:59.000 --> 0:01:01.200
<v Speaker 1>one thing, back when the way we did Scott Stale

0:01:01.200 --> 0:01:03.760
<v Speaker 1>ten years ago had that red color kind of master G.

0:01:03.760 --> 0:01:05.520
<v Speaker 4>Fifteen and things of that nature.

0:01:05.600 --> 0:01:08.280
<v Speaker 1>Here, you're going to see Scott our new Scottsdale family

0:01:08.959 --> 0:01:11.399
<v Speaker 1>have a color tie, a brand tie, that.

0:01:11.520 --> 0:01:13.839
<v Speaker 4>Psychological tie to our G four forty yep.

0:01:13.959 --> 0:01:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Right, So Tony talked a little bit about just the

0:01:16.880 --> 0:01:18.200
<v Speaker 1>name Scottsdale, like what is it?

0:01:18.240 --> 0:01:19.320
<v Speaker 4>What does it mean to the company.

0:01:19.440 --> 0:01:22.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So I think over the last few years our

0:01:22.959 --> 0:01:25.479
<v Speaker 3>naming of our putters, we've done a few different things

0:01:25.480 --> 0:01:27.880
<v Speaker 3>and tried some different stuff. Some of the feedback we've

0:01:27.920 --> 0:01:30.959
<v Speaker 3>had had from our sales reps and accounts is like,

0:01:31.760 --> 0:01:34.039
<v Speaker 3>can't we get back to a name of this line

0:01:34.040 --> 0:01:36.200
<v Speaker 3>of putters and what how that works? It keeps a

0:01:36.280 --> 0:01:40.120
<v Speaker 3>lot cleaner, a lot easier to understand. So we went

0:01:40.160 --> 0:01:42.039
<v Speaker 3>to John k and said, Hey, this is something we'd

0:01:42.080 --> 0:01:44.280
<v Speaker 3>like to do. He was open to it, asked for

0:01:44.400 --> 0:01:47.800
<v Speaker 3>some suggestions of names. The list was very short, right,

0:01:48.240 --> 0:01:49.880
<v Speaker 3>So we went back to him. We talked a little

0:01:49.880 --> 0:01:52.280
<v Speaker 3>bit to John K about the names and what they

0:01:52.320 --> 0:01:55.400
<v Speaker 3>meant to PING and Scottsdale stood out. And the reason

0:01:55.400 --> 0:01:57.080
<v Speaker 3>they stood out was a few reasons. It's one that

0:01:57.160 --> 0:01:59.240
<v Speaker 3>you just talked about is we had a line of

0:01:59.240 --> 0:02:01.400
<v Speaker 3>putters before that. It was very successful for us, and

0:02:01.440 --> 0:02:03.080
<v Speaker 3>we had a really good run with those lines with

0:02:03.160 --> 0:02:07.000
<v Speaker 3>that line of putters. But also it's just Scottsdale in general.

0:02:07.120 --> 0:02:10.840
<v Speaker 3>It's a golf haven's. We had the scott Stale putter

0:02:10.919 --> 0:02:15.000
<v Speaker 3>that had the peel box or address in the backs

0:02:15.000 --> 0:02:17.079
<v Speaker 3>that it's a little bit of a tie there. And

0:02:17.400 --> 0:02:21.000
<v Speaker 3>and then just overall, I think where pings at and Scottsdale,

0:02:21.520 --> 0:02:24.440
<v Speaker 3>the golfing, the waste management, all that stuff just kind

0:02:24.440 --> 0:02:26.800
<v Speaker 3>of made sense. So that's John K was good with that,

0:02:26.840 --> 0:02:29.000
<v Speaker 3>and we jumped on that name and are moving forward

0:02:29.000 --> 0:02:29.200
<v Speaker 3>with it.

0:02:29.480 --> 0:02:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So Scottsdale family. So we have pld's this is

0:02:33.280 --> 0:02:37.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of the meticulously milled putters, customized things of that

0:02:37.800 --> 0:02:41.600
<v Speaker 1>nature that's doing quite well for us. What is the

0:02:41.639 --> 0:02:45.519
<v Speaker 1>big differentiator between PLD in this Scottsdale family.

0:02:45.600 --> 0:02:48.480
<v Speaker 3>Good question. So, the like you said, the PLD is

0:02:48.520 --> 0:02:52.160
<v Speaker 3>a very high precision mill part that we started out

0:02:52.240 --> 0:02:55.040
<v Speaker 3>a block and we machine the whole. All those putters

0:02:55.080 --> 0:02:59.400
<v Speaker 3>are machined and their tolerances are extremely tight, but there's

0:02:59.480 --> 0:03:01.639
<v Speaker 3>there's no one. It's for the player that likes a

0:03:01.680 --> 0:03:05.560
<v Speaker 3>little bit more of a firmer fiel off the face.

0:03:05.639 --> 0:03:07.399
<v Speaker 3>But even with our scots that we offer a couple

0:03:07.480 --> 0:03:11.320
<v Speaker 3>different levels of firmness. I would say our deep mill

0:03:11.480 --> 0:03:14.480
<v Speaker 3>on the pold is probably the softest one for a

0:03:14.480 --> 0:03:17.280
<v Speaker 3>milk putter, and I would say in the Scotstone. Now

0:03:17.320 --> 0:03:20.320
<v Speaker 3>with this answert, it's the next step in that direction

0:03:20.440 --> 0:03:25.240
<v Speaker 3>of a softer feeling face. So that's the biggest difference.

0:03:25.280 --> 0:03:28.919
<v Speaker 3>But I will jump into taking an answert and putting

0:03:28.919 --> 0:03:30.359
<v Speaker 3>it into a putter that allows you to do a

0:03:30.360 --> 0:03:34.040
<v Speaker 3>few things with your designs. YEA One is if you

0:03:34.080 --> 0:03:38.760
<v Speaker 3>imagine taking a solid face putter and you're taking this

0:03:38.840 --> 0:03:41.240
<v Speaker 3>much material out, but you're taking forty or fifty grams

0:03:41.280 --> 0:03:43.520
<v Speaker 3>out right and you're putting ten back in, so you

0:03:43.560 --> 0:03:47.640
<v Speaker 3>have forty issue grams of discretionary weight to work with.

0:03:47.840 --> 0:03:50.680
<v Speaker 3>So that allows us to move our weight around to

0:03:50.680 --> 0:03:53.720
<v Speaker 3>make the putter more forgiving a little bit bigger without

0:03:53.760 --> 0:03:57.840
<v Speaker 3>losing the shape or look of that design. So the

0:03:57.880 --> 0:04:00.720
<v Speaker 3>answert allows us and I think we've on Scott's all

0:04:00.760 --> 0:04:04.520
<v Speaker 3>the putter heads are approximately eleven percent higher and Mali

0:04:05.040 --> 0:04:06.080
<v Speaker 3>because of the answer.

0:04:05.800 --> 0:04:06.680
<v Speaker 4>Allows us to do that.

0:04:06.920 --> 0:04:08.960
<v Speaker 3>It also allows us to really focus and keep our

0:04:08.960 --> 0:04:12.480
<v Speaker 3>CG where we want it, so it helps the player

0:04:12.720 --> 0:04:14.279
<v Speaker 3>perform better for the player.

0:04:14.560 --> 0:04:16.240
<v Speaker 2>Tony, when when somebody comes to the lab and they

0:04:16.240 --> 0:04:17.800
<v Speaker 2>want to get fit for a putter now, and obviously

0:04:17.839 --> 0:04:21.760
<v Speaker 2>Scott Stille's back in the line, how does that conversation

0:04:21.960 --> 0:04:25.000
<v Speaker 2>go in terms of do I go PLD, do I

0:04:25.040 --> 0:04:27.760
<v Speaker 2>go Scott? Still? Is it the type of player you are?

0:04:27.800 --> 0:04:29.880
<v Speaker 2>A skill set? Like? How does that make sense for

0:04:29.920 --> 0:04:30.720
<v Speaker 2>the player coming in?

0:04:31.040 --> 0:04:34.400
<v Speaker 3>I personally think it's more of a personal preference when

0:04:34.400 --> 0:04:36.320
<v Speaker 3>a guy comes in. There's certain players that come in

0:04:36.400 --> 0:04:40.120
<v Speaker 3>that want that milk putter, that really clean look the

0:04:40.120 --> 0:04:43.159
<v Speaker 3>million lines, and then there's another player that comes in

0:04:43.160 --> 0:04:45.239
<v Speaker 3>and wants a softer, filling putter, a little bit bigger,

0:04:45.279 --> 0:04:49.160
<v Speaker 3>more forgiving. So I think it's a personal preference when

0:04:49.200 --> 0:04:51.159
<v Speaker 3>a player comes in and does a fitting, and they'll

0:04:51.200 --> 0:04:53.159
<v Speaker 3>have those options to go back and forth with that.

0:04:53.560 --> 0:04:56.640
<v Speaker 2>Also nine models is that right? I saw that I

0:04:56.680 --> 0:05:00.320
<v Speaker 2>was like nine models, seems like substantial amount of different heads. Yeah,

0:05:00.320 --> 0:05:01.240
<v Speaker 2>in the Scottsdale line.

0:05:01.320 --> 0:05:04.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think back to our original Scotstone. Some of

0:05:04.320 --> 0:05:06.479
<v Speaker 3>the lines we've done in the past, we've had, you know,

0:05:06.480 --> 0:05:09.560
<v Speaker 3>anywhere from eight to ten to twelve models, and it's

0:05:09.560 --> 0:05:12.240
<v Speaker 3>always hard to say what that number is because we

0:05:12.279 --> 0:05:14.920
<v Speaker 3>want to offer as many different putters as you can

0:05:15.000 --> 0:05:17.760
<v Speaker 3>with the different stroke types for different fittings for different players.

0:05:17.839 --> 0:05:20.040
<v Speaker 3>But at the end of the day, we got to

0:05:20.080 --> 0:05:22.320
<v Speaker 3>pick a number and then try and fill those spots

0:05:22.320 --> 0:05:25.120
<v Speaker 3>out with a blade, a midmulet of mallet, and then

0:05:25.120 --> 0:05:27.400
<v Speaker 3>then different stroke types of those putters that help the

0:05:27.440 --> 0:05:28.160
<v Speaker 3>different players.

0:05:28.400 --> 0:05:30.039
<v Speaker 2>Marty, I mean it is interesting, you know, you do

0:05:30.120 --> 0:05:32.920
<v Speaker 2>think about it feels like putters these days, I mean,

0:05:32.960 --> 0:05:35.440
<v Speaker 2>the options are basically unlimited, you know, you think about

0:05:35.760 --> 0:05:37.760
<v Speaker 2>I mean I just went through this a few months ago,

0:05:37.839 --> 0:05:40.720
<v Speaker 2>getting into a PLD and kind of going through some

0:05:40.760 --> 0:05:42.760
<v Speaker 2>of the models a little bit more mallet style, trying

0:05:42.760 --> 0:05:44.840
<v Speaker 2>to go through that. And every time I go through

0:05:44.880 --> 0:05:46.640
<v Speaker 2>a fitting here at Pinging for putters, it feels like

0:05:46.680 --> 0:05:49.359
<v Speaker 2>there's more opportunity and there's more styles out there to

0:05:49.400 --> 0:05:51.200
<v Speaker 2>fit a certain player, and it's like making sure you

0:05:51.200 --> 0:05:52.960
<v Speaker 2>get your hands on the right ones. You don't want

0:05:52.960 --> 0:05:54.520
<v Speaker 2>to have too many, I'm assuming, because you don't want

0:05:54.520 --> 0:05:56.600
<v Speaker 2>to give somebody thirty options, right and then they get

0:05:56.800 --> 0:05:58.640
<v Speaker 2>consumed by that number. But you want to make sure

0:05:58.680 --> 0:06:01.039
<v Speaker 2>that there's some out there to make any player coming

0:06:01.080 --> 0:06:02.760
<v Speaker 2>through comfortable with what they're going to walk away with.

0:06:03.040 --> 0:06:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, absolutely, I think that can be. You know, folks

0:06:05.920 --> 0:06:09.400
<v Speaker 1>can walk into let's say you go to your retail store.

0:06:09.520 --> 0:06:12.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, you go into a putting craal, You got

0:06:12.520 --> 0:06:13.480
<v Speaker 1>all these options, you.

0:06:13.440 --> 0:06:14.200
<v Speaker 4>Know, what do you do?

0:06:14.720 --> 0:06:15.680
<v Speaker 2>So where do you start?

0:06:15.720 --> 0:06:16.640
<v Speaker 4>Where do you start?

0:06:17.200 --> 0:06:20.120
<v Speaker 1>So we've built you know, I know last year when

0:06:20.160 --> 0:06:22.559
<v Speaker 1>we launched the S one fifty nine wedges, we launched

0:06:22.600 --> 0:06:25.279
<v Speaker 1>this really cool tool called webfit Wedge. It takes a

0:06:25.320 --> 0:06:28.120
<v Speaker 1>couple of minutes to go through easy questions to answer.

0:06:28.160 --> 0:06:30.240
<v Speaker 1>We got a QR code out there to go through it.

0:06:31.160 --> 0:06:34.920
<v Speaker 1>We're launching now with the Scottsdale a similar solution called

0:06:35.000 --> 0:06:38.560
<v Speaker 1>webfit Putters, which you go through you answer some very

0:06:38.600 --> 0:06:41.919
<v Speaker 1>basic questions. For example, one of the aspects of getting

0:06:41.920 --> 0:06:43.880
<v Speaker 1>fit for the right putter is do you pull your

0:06:43.920 --> 0:06:46.920
<v Speaker 1>putts or do you push your putts? And we had

0:06:47.040 --> 0:06:49.520
<v Speaker 1>doctor Sasha Mackenzie on we went super deep on the

0:06:49.560 --> 0:06:52.960
<v Speaker 1>science of the kinetics and kinematics here, but on a

0:06:53.000 --> 0:06:56.400
<v Speaker 1>simple level, if you pull your putts and you play

0:06:56.440 --> 0:07:00.160
<v Speaker 1>a more tow down putter or in our vernacular it's

0:07:00.160 --> 0:07:03.279
<v Speaker 1>like strong arc that will deliver the face more open.

0:07:03.480 --> 0:07:04.760
<v Speaker 4>So you go through this very.

0:07:04.640 --> 0:07:08.280
<v Speaker 1>Simple webfit putter app a couple minutes and it narrows

0:07:08.320 --> 0:07:11.160
<v Speaker 1>down your options from nine. It gives you your rank

0:07:11.280 --> 0:07:13.640
<v Speaker 1>order list of two or three interesting that then you

0:07:13.680 --> 0:07:15.720
<v Speaker 1>can go try in the corral. So we've tried to

0:07:15.720 --> 0:07:18.960
<v Speaker 1>really simplify that because we we love having a lot

0:07:18.960 --> 0:07:21.160
<v Speaker 1>of options. It is really hard to narrow down to nine.

0:07:21.400 --> 0:07:23.040
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time then you got to zoom

0:07:23.160 --> 0:07:25.160
<v Speaker 1>zoom consumers in so they aren't confused.

0:07:25.560 --> 0:07:28.480
<v Speaker 2>And Tony, I know crazy is back, which is exciting

0:07:28.520 --> 0:07:30.160
<v Speaker 2>I know for a lot of people kind of within

0:07:30.200 --> 0:07:30.720
<v Speaker 2>the company.

0:07:30.680 --> 0:07:34.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think that was brought back by just demand

0:07:34.920 --> 0:07:37.760
<v Speaker 3>we here. I've heard for years just where's the crazy?

0:07:37.760 --> 0:07:38.520
<v Speaker 4>Where's it crazy?

0:07:38.800 --> 0:07:42.080
<v Speaker 3>And we've done different variations of the crazy. Uh, the

0:07:42.120 --> 0:07:44.600
<v Speaker 3>scot silk putter or the crazy that we're coming back

0:07:44.600 --> 0:07:48.520
<v Speaker 3>to is more in line with the original crazy. Size

0:07:48.520 --> 0:07:50.920
<v Speaker 3>and shape. People are very excited about it.

0:07:51.040 --> 0:07:51.680
<v Speaker 4>People have been.

0:07:51.600 --> 0:07:55.080
<v Speaker 3>Waiting for it, and just the feedback from again from

0:07:55.080 --> 0:07:57.640
<v Speaker 3>our reps, consumers, people that come in here into the

0:07:57.720 --> 0:07:59.560
<v Speaker 3>lab are like, hey, do you have a crazy I

0:07:59.600 --> 0:08:02.360
<v Speaker 3>remember had a crazy G two at G five, and

0:08:03.480 --> 0:08:05.560
<v Speaker 3>I think we just decided as a team this it's time.

0:08:05.600 --> 0:08:07.680
<v Speaker 3>It's a good time to bring this back and get

0:08:07.720 --> 0:08:09.920
<v Speaker 3>this back out there. So it's it's a putter that

0:08:09.960 --> 0:08:11.280
<v Speaker 3>has very close ties to Ping.

0:08:11.320 --> 0:08:12.880
<v Speaker 4>It's very it's for us.

0:08:12.880 --> 0:08:17.400
<v Speaker 3>It's a very special design for us. And yeah, it's

0:08:17.440 --> 0:08:21.040
<v Speaker 3>it's the mass properties on that putter are really good

0:08:21.360 --> 0:08:23.680
<v Speaker 3>and we're excited to get it back and get in

0:08:23.680 --> 0:08:24.559
<v Speaker 3>people's hands again.

0:08:24.680 --> 0:08:27.360
<v Speaker 2>Marty, we joked about this when we were talking four forty.

0:08:27.400 --> 0:08:30.240
<v Speaker 2>It's like nothing goes away, really. I mean, you can

0:08:30.320 --> 0:08:33.320
<v Speaker 2>perfect it, you can add you know, modern engineering to it,

0:08:33.360 --> 0:08:35.319
<v Speaker 2>but nothing really goes away at Ping, Like you can

0:08:35.400 --> 0:08:38.160
<v Speaker 2>always bring back some of the stuff that was successful

0:08:38.160 --> 0:08:39.360
<v Speaker 2>ten twenty thirty years ago.

0:08:39.760 --> 0:08:40.559
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, the crazy.

0:08:40.760 --> 0:08:43.400
<v Speaker 1>I have the original G two in my in my

0:08:43.760 --> 0:08:45.840
<v Speaker 1>collection at home in my garage, and I always set

0:08:45.840 --> 0:08:48.000
<v Speaker 1>it down every month I'm out there, certain one for

0:08:48.080 --> 0:08:50.959
<v Speaker 1>a putter, and I see that original one. And now

0:08:51.000 --> 0:08:55.040
<v Speaker 1>with the Scottsdale bringing back the original shaping proportions of

0:08:55.040 --> 0:09:00.600
<v Speaker 1>the original crazy with the new insert. And so Tony,

0:09:00.640 --> 0:09:03.120
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk a little bit more about the insert. Okay,

0:09:03.400 --> 0:09:06.920
<v Speaker 1>it saves weight from the face the average Amalie eleven

0:09:07.000 --> 0:09:11.080
<v Speaker 1>percent higher. Tell us about this feedbacks material because people

0:09:11.080 --> 0:09:13.400
<v Speaker 1>are gonna look at the insert. They're gonna say, hey, okay, great,

0:09:13.640 --> 0:09:16.040
<v Speaker 1>you know face insert, you know, a little bigger potter,

0:09:16.120 --> 0:09:19.520
<v Speaker 1>more forgiving. What is it about this feedbacks material and

0:09:19.559 --> 0:09:23.320
<v Speaker 1>the feedback that we got from both players tour in,

0:09:23.360 --> 0:09:24.360
<v Speaker 1>our players we test with.

0:09:24.520 --> 0:09:26.720
<v Speaker 3>So we've been back to the original scotts So we've

0:09:26.720 --> 0:09:30.800
<v Speaker 3>been always working with a feedbacks material, right. We've tried

0:09:30.840 --> 0:09:35.360
<v Speaker 3>different thickness is, different derometers, we've tried one piece, two piece,

0:09:36.840 --> 0:09:38.959
<v Speaker 3>so we have a lot of experience with it and

0:09:39.000 --> 0:09:41.080
<v Speaker 3>we've done a ton of testing with it. On this

0:09:41.120 --> 0:09:43.520
<v Speaker 3>particular one, we went back to just a single piece

0:09:43.800 --> 0:09:46.959
<v Speaker 3>and the doramas we tried three or four different dramas

0:09:46.960 --> 0:09:49.400
<v Speaker 3>and we've done a lot of testing here with players

0:09:49.400 --> 0:09:51.520
<v Speaker 3>to get feedback on what feels the best, what sounds

0:09:51.559 --> 0:09:55.600
<v Speaker 3>the best, and what rolls the best to them. So

0:09:55.840 --> 0:09:59.040
<v Speaker 3>on this one, it's it's It's one of those things

0:09:59.040 --> 0:10:02.040
<v Speaker 3>where we got to a point where the feedback we

0:10:02.040 --> 0:10:06.280
<v Speaker 3>were getting was so good on this thickness, on this material,

0:10:06.360 --> 0:10:10.000
<v Speaker 3>on this hardness, but even the texture on the face, Yeah,

0:10:10.200 --> 0:10:12.000
<v Speaker 3>is a big part of this. The little details like

0:10:12.000 --> 0:10:15.080
<v Speaker 3>that I think really contribute to how this putter feels, sounds,

0:10:15.080 --> 0:10:17.440
<v Speaker 3>and how the ball comes off the face. I'm very

0:10:17.480 --> 0:10:20.800
<v Speaker 3>excited about this insert, and I think if it's not

0:10:21.840 --> 0:10:24.040
<v Speaker 3>the best innswert we've done in a while here at Ping,

0:10:24.040 --> 0:10:26.800
<v Speaker 3>it's one of the best that we've we've produced. And

0:10:27.200 --> 0:10:29.559
<v Speaker 3>I say that because a lot of testing we've done

0:10:29.600 --> 0:10:32.880
<v Speaker 3>in the feedback we've got is this again, it's a

0:10:32.880 --> 0:10:36.160
<v Speaker 3>little it's a softer feel versus like a PLD, but

0:10:36.440 --> 0:10:39.680
<v Speaker 3>I would say that it's not super soft. It has

0:10:39.720 --> 0:10:42.839
<v Speaker 3>some firmness to it. The sound is great, the feel

0:10:42.920 --> 0:10:45.040
<v Speaker 3>is great, But the best the best thing I would

0:10:45.040 --> 0:10:47.199
<v Speaker 3>say about this is how the ball responds off the face.

0:10:47.480 --> 0:10:51.240
<v Speaker 3>It's very consistent. We focused on the designs to make

0:10:51.760 --> 0:10:55.680
<v Speaker 3>most of these putters full face inserts, so that the

0:10:55.760 --> 0:10:58.680
<v Speaker 3>consistency across the face with this answert and how the

0:10:58.720 --> 0:11:02.960
<v Speaker 3>ball comes off is very good and consistent. The only

0:11:03.000 --> 0:11:05.000
<v Speaker 3>model i'd say that we don't try and do the

0:11:05.000 --> 0:11:07.920
<v Speaker 3>full face answers the D seventy two, and that's because

0:11:08.200 --> 0:11:11.040
<v Speaker 3>the insert is ball with which matches kind of the

0:11:11.040 --> 0:11:13.880
<v Speaker 3>geometry of the head. Broll also allows to keep some

0:11:13.920 --> 0:11:15.520
<v Speaker 3>of that weight on the face out towards the heel

0:11:15.559 --> 0:11:17.199
<v Speaker 3>and toe for forgiveness, Will.

0:11:17.040 --> 0:11:19.600
<v Speaker 2>You see tour players introduce the Scott Still line into

0:11:19.640 --> 0:11:21.680
<v Speaker 2>their bag? Do you feel in twenty twenty five is

0:11:21.720 --> 0:11:24.360
<v Speaker 2>this something that certain players like in terms of an

0:11:24.400 --> 0:11:26.079
<v Speaker 2>insert versus not? I do.

0:11:26.360 --> 0:11:26.560
<v Speaker 4>I do.

0:11:26.720 --> 0:11:29.920
<v Speaker 3>I think even some of our current insert putters that

0:11:29.960 --> 0:11:31.880
<v Speaker 3>are out there, we do see some interest in it.

0:11:32.840 --> 0:11:34.360
<v Speaker 3>And again back to this answer, I feel like this

0:11:34.480 --> 0:11:36.440
<v Speaker 3>censor is going to fit some of our players on

0:11:36.520 --> 0:11:40.160
<v Speaker 3>tour perfectly. I think the size, the shape, the coloring,

0:11:40.520 --> 0:11:42.360
<v Speaker 3>just a whole new look for us with the Scott

0:11:42.440 --> 0:11:44.520
<v Speaker 3>Still line is going to grab a lot of attention

0:11:45.080 --> 0:11:50.079
<v Speaker 3>and I think especially in Japan and our LPGA players

0:11:50.120 --> 0:11:52.160
<v Speaker 3>are really going to be this is going to really

0:11:52.160 --> 0:11:52.840
<v Speaker 3>be good for them.

0:11:53.320 --> 0:11:55.040
<v Speaker 2>And something else Marty with that, I thought, I think

0:11:55.160 --> 0:11:57.240
<v Speaker 2>is really cool that it's the first time that Ping

0:11:57.280 --> 0:11:59.800
<v Speaker 2>has partnered up with Superstroke in terms of a grip

0:11:59.840 --> 0:12:02.120
<v Speaker 2>and really aligns well with the Scottsdale Putters.

0:12:02.720 --> 0:12:05.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think this partnership is new for us. We've

0:12:05.280 --> 0:12:09.280
<v Speaker 3>never done a ton with a superstroke, but we're excited

0:12:09.320 --> 0:12:13.040
<v Speaker 3>to jump in with this grip and work with the superstroke.

0:12:13.760 --> 0:12:15.480
<v Speaker 3>The one thing about the grip I would say that

0:12:16.880 --> 0:12:21.800
<v Speaker 3>really I feel like it's good for this whole putter

0:12:21.880 --> 0:12:25.760
<v Speaker 3>line is that it has the grip tapers down like

0:12:25.800 --> 0:12:28.640
<v Speaker 3>a traditional grip. It has some pistol to it.

0:12:28.640 --> 0:12:29.319
<v Speaker 2>It's kind of like.

0:12:29.440 --> 0:12:31.160
<v Speaker 3>What we like to do with our putter grips and

0:12:31.200 --> 0:12:33.920
<v Speaker 3>how we want to see that design. But also I

0:12:33.920 --> 0:12:37.160
<v Speaker 3>think it brings some really nice shelf appeal. Superstroke is

0:12:37.120 --> 0:12:39.520
<v Speaker 3>a very popular grip out in the industry. We all

0:12:39.559 --> 0:12:42.400
<v Speaker 3>know that, and again this is the first time for

0:12:42.480 --> 0:12:45.160
<v Speaker 3>us going in with them, So we're excited with this

0:12:45.200 --> 0:12:48.240
<v Speaker 3>relationship and we'll kind of see how it shakes out

0:12:48.280 --> 0:12:51.120
<v Speaker 3>as we move forward. But we really feel like this

0:12:51.800 --> 0:12:54.079
<v Speaker 3>grip is going to complete the whole package. So everything

0:12:54.120 --> 0:12:56.880
<v Speaker 3>looks really nice out there. And so part of this

0:12:57.040 --> 0:12:59.400
<v Speaker 3>was when we went into this is we really want

0:12:59.440 --> 0:13:02.199
<v Speaker 3>to differentiate from PLD. We really want to separate those

0:13:02.200 --> 0:13:04.120
<v Speaker 3>two lines where if you walk into a putter crow

0:13:04.760 --> 0:13:07.400
<v Speaker 3>you see the Scott still line the blue and then

0:13:07.440 --> 0:13:09.440
<v Speaker 3>you see the pod stuff. So there is no question

0:13:09.480 --> 0:13:12.120
<v Speaker 3>of what what is, which putter is, which this is

0:13:12.360 --> 0:13:13.880
<v Speaker 3>And that was a big goal for us going into

0:13:13.960 --> 0:13:17.480
<v Speaker 3>this project. It's differentiate between Scottsdale and PLD and this

0:13:17.559 --> 0:13:18.800
<v Speaker 3>grip really helps do that.

0:13:19.720 --> 0:13:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Tony putting is is tough, you know, and sometimes golfers.

0:13:23.800 --> 0:13:26.080
<v Speaker 4>Get a little vulnerable. They get they get they want.

0:13:25.960 --> 0:13:28.880
<v Speaker 1>To seek and try and try new things. Okay, so

0:13:29.000 --> 0:13:31.800
<v Speaker 1>what about golfers, I mean they want to try you know,

0:13:31.920 --> 0:13:32.640
<v Speaker 1>I think we're calling it.

0:13:32.679 --> 0:13:34.400
<v Speaker 4>I think the industry is kind of call it mid.

0:13:34.320 --> 0:13:37.360
<v Speaker 1>Length, you know, the Victor Hoblin style putting where you

0:13:37.360 --> 0:13:39.360
<v Speaker 1>get a longer grip, you grip down on it a

0:13:39.360 --> 0:13:43.360
<v Speaker 1>little bit, you got a little extra weight, or even

0:13:44.160 --> 0:13:47.920
<v Speaker 1>you know Jimmy hard k armlock style. Uh, tell us

0:13:47.920 --> 0:13:49.800
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about this version and what folks can

0:13:49.840 --> 0:13:52.920
<v Speaker 1>do to try, uh, you know, either mid length or armlock.

0:13:53.040 --> 0:13:56.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so the crazy putter. This one thing that's unique

0:13:56.320 --> 0:13:58.960
<v Speaker 3>with the Scott's silene, the crazy putter, that you'll be

0:13:58.960 --> 0:14:00.840
<v Speaker 3>able to get in the standard length or at a

0:14:00.880 --> 0:14:05.880
<v Speaker 3>counterbalance or armlock or mid length mid length. We can

0:14:05.920 --> 0:14:08.200
<v Speaker 3>do that with both so the consumer can get just

0:14:08.240 --> 0:14:10.560
<v Speaker 3>a standard thirty five inch or they can do something

0:14:10.559 --> 0:14:13.120
<v Speaker 3>at thirty eight or thirty seven with this grip. And

0:14:13.160 --> 0:14:16.160
<v Speaker 3>the grip again is the shelf appeal, the colors, the

0:14:16.200 --> 0:14:18.520
<v Speaker 3>whole package that works with the rest of the putter.

0:14:19.120 --> 0:14:23.480
<v Speaker 3>It works with the standard grip. But like Marty said,

0:14:23.520 --> 0:14:25.280
<v Speaker 3>we're trying to venture out a little bit more to

0:14:25.320 --> 0:14:28.840
<v Speaker 3>some of this non traditional these putters, I don't even

0:14:28.840 --> 0:14:31.600
<v Speaker 3>know if they're non traditional anymore, but just trying to

0:14:31.600 --> 0:14:34.440
<v Speaker 3>get out with that counterbouance, the armlock and even start.

0:14:34.520 --> 0:14:36.920
<v Speaker 3>We're doing more and more work with the long putters too.

0:14:37.000 --> 0:14:38.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't see a pepper on this at cover. What's

0:14:38.960 --> 0:14:40.720
<v Speaker 2>going on, Tony? Come on, man? I thought the pepper

0:14:40.800 --> 0:14:43.640
<v Speaker 2>was like, was your calling card? Right? Like the wet

0:14:43.680 --> 0:14:46.480
<v Speaker 2>bandits putting the things in the sink, Like, where's the pepper?

0:14:46.520 --> 0:14:48.640
<v Speaker 2>We got to get one on there. We could work

0:14:48.680 --> 0:14:50.640
<v Speaker 2>on that perfect perfect. I got to make sure your

0:14:50.680 --> 0:14:51.160
<v Speaker 2>signature's on.

0:14:52.120 --> 0:14:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Besides the crazy coming back, what's your personal favorite model

0:14:55.520 --> 0:14:58.400
<v Speaker 1>of the of all the models here in Scottsdale.

0:14:59.040 --> 0:14:59.720
<v Speaker 3>I think the.

0:15:01.200 --> 0:15:01.840
<v Speaker 4>Man there's so.

0:15:04.240 --> 0:15:06.400
<v Speaker 3>I gotta go crazy. Really, it's just I mean, it's

0:15:06.440 --> 0:15:08.920
<v Speaker 3>been around so long, and just it was nice to

0:15:08.920 --> 0:15:10.840
<v Speaker 3>bring it back and just work with it again and

0:15:10.880 --> 0:15:13.960
<v Speaker 3>just again dive into those numbers and MOI and what

0:15:14.000 --> 0:15:17.360
<v Speaker 3>that putter does, how well performs the forgiveness of it,

0:15:17.400 --> 0:15:19.880
<v Speaker 3>and just to look, it's very unique. It's very close

0:15:19.920 --> 0:15:22.080
<v Speaker 3>to ping. So that I think was.

0:15:22.760 --> 0:15:24.480
<v Speaker 1>One of the secrets of the crazy is a very

0:15:24.560 --> 0:15:27.480
<v Speaker 1>low center gravity, right, so the lower the CG. You've

0:15:27.480 --> 0:15:29.320
<v Speaker 1>seen this theme in the G four to forty line,

0:15:29.360 --> 0:15:32.400
<v Speaker 1>now you're seeing it here in Scottsdale. Low center of gravity.

0:15:32.480 --> 0:15:34.920
<v Speaker 1>That's a big part that makes it feel feel good

0:15:34.920 --> 0:15:38.360
<v Speaker 1>off the face. Tony, what about the B sixty three?

0:15:38.520 --> 0:15:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Tell us a little story about the B sixty three.

0:15:40.360 --> 0:15:43.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so the B sixty is well again another iconic

0:15:43.200 --> 0:15:45.760
<v Speaker 3>putter with ping. We've done this putter for a long time.

0:15:46.680 --> 0:15:50.840
<v Speaker 3>It's very close and special to us. On this particular design,

0:15:50.920 --> 0:15:52.920
<v Speaker 3>we were working with a couple of players in Japan,

0:15:53.200 --> 0:15:55.840
<v Speaker 3>but also Billy horseshow at the time was interested in

0:15:56.280 --> 0:15:59.000
<v Speaker 3>the B sixty, but he was looking for something with

0:15:59.040 --> 0:16:04.000
<v Speaker 3>that mid slint hozzle. I personally think that that geometrail

0:16:04.000 --> 0:16:06.400
<v Speaker 3>of the of the B sixties, it's a lot of

0:16:06.600 --> 0:16:10.080
<v Speaker 3>round corners and edges and softness. It's not a lot

0:16:10.120 --> 0:16:12.640
<v Speaker 3>of hard edges on it. So I think that putter

0:16:12.720 --> 0:16:16.600
<v Speaker 3>fits that design perfectly because it's it's a mid slant.

0:16:16.640 --> 0:16:18.400
<v Speaker 3>It kind of flows into the head and the whole

0:16:18.440 --> 0:16:22.240
<v Speaker 3>head kind of flows all together. But it was it

0:16:22.320 --> 0:16:25.720
<v Speaker 3>was originally working with some players to see a B

0:16:25.880 --> 0:16:29.440
<v Speaker 3>sixty with a different towdown angle and with that type

0:16:29.440 --> 0:16:29.920
<v Speaker 3>of a look.

0:16:30.200 --> 0:16:31.320
<v Speaker 4>So that's strong arc.

0:16:31.680 --> 0:16:34.880
<v Speaker 3>It's it's a slight slid slide sixty three slid, yeah,

0:16:34.920 --> 0:16:38.480
<v Speaker 3>and the B sixties usually around thirty degrees, and then

0:16:38.520 --> 0:16:41.120
<v Speaker 3>this one has a little bit more toe hang soka.

0:16:41.160 --> 0:16:43.440
<v Speaker 3>But I think more importantly, I think just that hozzle

0:16:43.640 --> 0:16:46.920
<v Speaker 3>fits the geometrail of that head. Again, was kind of

0:16:46.920 --> 0:16:48.240
<v Speaker 3>a tour inspired.

0:16:47.840 --> 0:16:48.240
<v Speaker 4>To do that.

0:16:48.320 --> 0:16:50.360
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's one of my favorite parts. I mean,

0:16:50.680 --> 0:16:52.720
<v Speaker 2>golf clubs are golf clubs, and I know that they are,

0:16:52.800 --> 0:16:54.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, years in the making in terms of how

0:16:54.520 --> 0:16:56.600
<v Speaker 2>they're produced, but I feel like in terms of the

0:16:56.640 --> 0:16:59.440
<v Speaker 2>golf clubs that are unique or new models, it feels

0:16:59.440 --> 0:17:02.200
<v Speaker 2>like the Potter more than anything, can be inspired by

0:17:02.200 --> 0:17:04.159
<v Speaker 2>tour players coming to you guys and saying, can I

0:17:04.200 --> 0:17:06.080
<v Speaker 2>see this? Can you guys adjust this?

0:17:06.080 --> 0:17:06.199
<v Speaker 4>Then?

0:17:06.240 --> 0:17:08.280
<v Speaker 2>All of a sudden, they become the putter that people

0:17:08.359 --> 0:17:10.040
<v Speaker 2>can buy. I just think that's so cool and it's

0:17:10.040 --> 0:17:10.879
<v Speaker 2>such a cool story to tea.

0:17:11.000 --> 0:17:12.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and I think that's one of the things of

0:17:12.880 --> 0:17:14.639
<v Speaker 3>my job I really enjoy, is like you can go

0:17:14.680 --> 0:17:17.639
<v Speaker 3>out with players that Oh I remember I had that

0:17:17.680 --> 0:17:20.280
<v Speaker 3>putter in my garage. I remember my dad played this putter.

0:17:20.720 --> 0:17:22.600
<v Speaker 3>I really like that putter. But man, I'd really like

0:17:22.680 --> 0:17:24.800
<v Speaker 3>to see what would look like with this right that,

0:17:25.000 --> 0:17:27.320
<v Speaker 3>or something that fits my stroke type better. What can

0:17:27.359 --> 0:17:29.959
<v Speaker 3>I do to get this model to fit me better?

0:17:30.040 --> 0:17:34.399
<v Speaker 3>So that helps us as a company, as in designing putters,

0:17:34.440 --> 0:17:36.480
<v Speaker 3>is to come up with new stuff, maybe a little

0:17:36.520 --> 0:17:39.320
<v Speaker 3>spin on something old, but we're always looking to make

0:17:39.359 --> 0:17:41.560
<v Speaker 3>that better if we can improve on something we've done before.

0:17:41.640 --> 0:17:43.760
<v Speaker 2>I mean, Tony, those are these like email like let's

0:17:43.840 --> 0:17:46.360
<v Speaker 2>let's go through the Billy Horsell story, or these emails

0:17:46.440 --> 0:17:50.199
<v Speaker 2>or these conversations. Are these him coming in and showing

0:17:50.240 --> 0:17:52.680
<v Speaker 2>you what he likes, Like, how does that process work?

0:17:52.720 --> 0:17:55.560
<v Speaker 2>From Hey, I'm a top twenty player in the world.

0:17:55.600 --> 0:17:58.040
<v Speaker 2>I've got some ideas to Oh, Now, all of a sudden,

0:17:58.080 --> 0:17:59.879
<v Speaker 2>it's one of the nine models that we're offering. In

0:17:59.880 --> 0:18:00.680
<v Speaker 2>the Scott Still line.

0:18:00.800 --> 0:18:04.880
<v Speaker 3>I would say it's a little bit of both. It's direct,

0:18:05.040 --> 0:18:07.480
<v Speaker 3>you know, emails or text from a player that wants

0:18:07.520 --> 0:18:09.040
<v Speaker 3>to see something, and a lot of times I think

0:18:09.040 --> 0:18:11.560
<v Speaker 3>we talked about this before. It could be me doing

0:18:11.600 --> 0:18:15.160
<v Speaker 3>some some CAD work and sending them four or five

0:18:15.200 --> 0:18:17.760
<v Speaker 3>or different looks and they say, hey, pick your top three,

0:18:17.960 --> 0:18:20.080
<v Speaker 3>and we just kind of narrow down to a look

0:18:20.119 --> 0:18:22.440
<v Speaker 3>that they like on the screen. And then the next

0:18:22.440 --> 0:18:24.080
<v Speaker 3>thing for me is I print something out on our

0:18:24.080 --> 0:18:26.800
<v Speaker 3>three D printer and then go out on tour and

0:18:27.160 --> 0:18:29.160
<v Speaker 3>take it out and have them actually set it down

0:18:29.200 --> 0:18:32.120
<v Speaker 3>behind a ball and see if they like that, they

0:18:32.240 --> 0:18:33.960
<v Speaker 3>like or don't like whatever. We just go through that

0:18:34.000 --> 0:18:36.879
<v Speaker 3>process a few times before we actually start cutting apart.

0:18:37.000 --> 0:18:41.960
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, a lot of Billy was mostly like sometimes

0:18:41.960 --> 0:18:45.720
<v Speaker 3>to suit their asients. It's through our reps. It's he's

0:18:45.760 --> 0:18:47.960
<v Speaker 3>been in here several times and just sitting down talking

0:18:47.960 --> 0:18:50.439
<v Speaker 3>about stuff in the past. Maybe he's played with us

0:18:50.480 --> 0:18:53.280
<v Speaker 3>that he's had success with and just kind of kind

0:18:53.280 --> 0:18:54.639
<v Speaker 3>of revisiting some of that stuff.

0:18:55.440 --> 0:18:57.960
<v Speaker 1>He's used our feedbacks answer a lot. He's a big

0:18:58.000 --> 0:18:59.800
<v Speaker 1>fan from a sound and field standpoint.

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:03.040
<v Speaker 3>He's been in our putter for a couple of years

0:19:03.119 --> 0:19:05.760
<v Speaker 3>now with the same type of materials, the same type of.

0:19:07.000 --> 0:19:09.240
<v Speaker 1>I got another one, Shane that we had on the

0:19:09.240 --> 0:19:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Pod last year. Matt McCarty right, Tyne, he's playing a

0:19:13.080 --> 0:19:17.600
<v Speaker 1>time center shafted. So tell us about the primetime see

0:19:17.920 --> 0:19:19.080
<v Speaker 1>in this family yep.

0:19:19.160 --> 0:19:23.080
<v Speaker 3>So the primetime putter has been really good for us.

0:19:23.280 --> 0:19:26.399
<v Speaker 3>It's it's very popular. A lot of times when we

0:19:26.400 --> 0:19:28.240
<v Speaker 3>set out to say, hey, we're gonna do nine models,

0:19:28.240 --> 0:19:30.320
<v Speaker 3>they will review it with a team. A lot of

0:19:30.320 --> 0:19:33.280
<v Speaker 3>times we just get this feedback from our sales teams.

0:19:33.320 --> 0:19:34.600
<v Speaker 2>You have to have a time putter.

0:19:34.600 --> 0:19:37.679
<v Speaker 3>It just does really well for us. A center shaft

0:19:37.680 --> 0:19:40.880
<v Speaker 3>putter with the time just seemed like a really good mix.

0:19:40.920 --> 0:19:42.639
<v Speaker 3>We've done some of that with Pod, with some of

0:19:42.680 --> 0:19:46.120
<v Speaker 3>that with with Matt. We've done some of that work

0:19:46.160 --> 0:19:49.520
<v Speaker 3>on tour. So we know that that model, it's a

0:19:49.560 --> 0:19:53.280
<v Speaker 3>symmetric design and that hozzle. The hozzle is another thing

0:19:53.320 --> 0:19:56.359
<v Speaker 3>that's new, not new, but we've gone back to putting

0:19:56.480 --> 0:19:59.440
<v Speaker 3>the little stem on top of that, which it's interesting

0:19:59.440 --> 0:20:01.479
<v Speaker 3>a lot of players is like if you show them

0:20:01.480 --> 0:20:04.560
<v Speaker 3>both one where the chef just goes directly into the head.

0:20:04.640 --> 0:20:06.840
<v Speaker 3>One with the stem. A lot of guys will look

0:20:06.840 --> 0:20:09.639
<v Speaker 3>down and like they can't really tell you what's different,

0:20:09.760 --> 0:20:11.919
<v Speaker 3>but they know they like that one, which is the stem.

0:20:12.000 --> 0:20:12.440
<v Speaker 2>Interesting.

0:20:12.480 --> 0:20:15.679
<v Speaker 3>So some of that feedback. H Mackenzie Hughes is a

0:20:15.720 --> 0:20:17.480
<v Speaker 3>big proponent of that, right, and some of the guys

0:20:17.520 --> 0:20:20.040
<v Speaker 3>that played center shaft for a long time always go

0:20:20.160 --> 0:20:23.160
<v Speaker 3>back to, hey man, that stem, it just looks different,

0:20:23.160 --> 0:20:26.000
<v Speaker 3>it looks better. So based on that feedback, went back

0:20:26.000 --> 0:20:27.160
<v Speaker 3>and added that to that.

0:20:27.160 --> 0:20:30.359
<v Speaker 1>That's one of that might be arguing my favorite little

0:20:30.400 --> 0:20:33.240
<v Speaker 1>piece in detail. The Scottsdale family is the primetime see

0:20:33.280 --> 0:20:36.080
<v Speaker 1>and that little stem, it just it cleans it up.

0:20:36.119 --> 0:20:36.359
<v Speaker 4>You know.

0:20:36.520 --> 0:20:38.600
<v Speaker 1>And I think we can tell Matt McCarty maybe he's

0:20:38.680 --> 0:20:41.280
<v Speaker 1>grew up in Scottsdale. Maybe this family well, I mean,

0:20:42.359 --> 0:20:44.880
<v Speaker 1>winning like he's been doing in twenty four it might

0:20:44.920 --> 0:20:45.840
<v Speaker 1>be something smart to do.

0:20:45.920 --> 0:20:48.200
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the guy, you know, you think about that too.

0:20:48.200 --> 0:20:49.879
<v Speaker 2>I mean it's just so interesting. You talk about the

0:20:49.920 --> 0:20:53.080
<v Speaker 2>progressions of a professional golfer and if you're Matt McCarty,

0:20:53.119 --> 0:20:56.160
<v Speaker 2>you go from you know, I'm playing corn Ferry Tour

0:20:56.240 --> 0:20:58.720
<v Speaker 2>golf too, I'm having some success on corn Ferry Tour

0:20:58.760 --> 0:21:01.040
<v Speaker 2>Golf to now I'm winning on the court to down

0:21:01.040 --> 0:21:02.960
<v Speaker 2>one on the PGA Tour, and now I'm an influence

0:21:03.359 --> 0:21:05.280
<v Speaker 2>on a whole line of putters. I mean, it is

0:21:05.320 --> 0:21:08.359
<v Speaker 2>a cool part of the progression of pro golf is

0:21:08.760 --> 0:21:12.359
<v Speaker 2>all of a sudden, Ping has obviously been interested in you,

0:21:12.400 --> 0:21:15.000
<v Speaker 2>but now we're listening to what you're saying because you

0:21:15.119 --> 0:21:19.120
<v Speaker 2>now become one of the best golfers in the world. Well, Tony,

0:21:19.160 --> 0:21:21.879
<v Speaker 2>we always appreciate the time. We always appreciate chatt uh putters.

0:21:21.920 --> 0:21:25.040
<v Speaker 2>I know you're excited about the Scottsdale line, and I

0:21:25.080 --> 0:21:27.399
<v Speaker 2>know we always push people to get fit for putters.

0:21:27.400 --> 0:21:29.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm assuming that's a big part of this as well.

0:21:29.280 --> 0:21:31.239
<v Speaker 2>Make sure you go through the web tool and make

0:21:31.280 --> 0:21:33.640
<v Speaker 2>sure you get fit for one of these models, because

0:21:33.680 --> 0:21:34.840
<v Speaker 2>as we said, there are nine there.

0:21:35.880 --> 0:21:37.760
<v Speaker 3>We work closely with Marty and his group and when

0:21:37.800 --> 0:21:39.520
<v Speaker 3>we go in I keep going back to when we

0:21:39.560 --> 0:21:41.560
<v Speaker 3>pick our models. A big part of that is we

0:21:41.600 --> 0:21:44.639
<v Speaker 3>work with Marty and his team is making sure we

0:21:44.720 --> 0:21:47.960
<v Speaker 3>have the different stroke types and different putters for all

0:21:48.000 --> 0:21:52.520
<v Speaker 3>different golfers and different strokes that we have. A guy

0:21:52.560 --> 0:21:54.199
<v Speaker 3>can go and get fit and figure out there's two

0:21:54.280 --> 0:21:56.560
<v Speaker 3>or three models that will fit his stroke type. So

0:21:56.600 --> 0:21:58.840
<v Speaker 3>it's important, I know for Marty and for our team

0:21:59.160 --> 0:22:02.960
<v Speaker 3>is to make sure we're bring all the different types

0:22:03.000 --> 0:22:04.119
<v Speaker 3>of putters and stroke types.

0:22:04.280 --> 0:22:07.159
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we're in this interesting era, Shane, where you know

0:22:07.200 --> 0:22:09.120
<v Speaker 1>you've seen a lot of the market try these heel

0:22:09.240 --> 0:22:12.480
<v Speaker 1>shafted deep CG putters. You have to have a lot

0:22:12.480 --> 0:22:14.480
<v Speaker 1>of torque, and I've played with a lot of people,

0:22:14.680 --> 0:22:17.800
<v Speaker 1>so both the theory of it and anecdotally, a lot

0:22:17.840 --> 0:22:20.400
<v Speaker 1>of people miss those putters to the right. Then we've

0:22:20.440 --> 0:22:23.359
<v Speaker 1>seen some players try these center shafted putters. Have a

0:22:23.400 --> 0:22:27.360
<v Speaker 1>little different design philosophy. Everyone's missing those to the left.

0:22:27.560 --> 0:22:30.480
<v Speaker 1>The right answer is in putters is that you need

0:22:30.560 --> 0:22:33.640
<v Speaker 1>to match, You need to fit how you apply force

0:22:33.680 --> 0:22:36.119
<v Speaker 1>and torque to the putter, to the putter itself. And

0:22:36.160 --> 0:22:38.560
<v Speaker 1>we have a kind of a simplified strategy on that. Now,

0:22:38.680 --> 0:22:41.360
<v Speaker 1>if you pull your putts, play more totem putter, push

0:22:41.440 --> 0:22:43.960
<v Speaker 1>your putts, play more face balance putter, we can we

0:22:43.960 --> 0:22:46.680
<v Speaker 1>can really simplify that. So if folks want to go

0:22:46.480 --> 0:22:48.960
<v Speaker 1>to go out and try our our webfit tool, go

0:22:49.000 --> 0:22:52.640
<v Speaker 1>to putter dop webfit dot ping dot com. Only takes

0:22:52.640 --> 0:22:54.680
<v Speaker 1>a couple of minutes, great way to kind of get

0:22:54.680 --> 0:22:57.480
<v Speaker 1>to know the whole Scottsdale family and our pod family too.

0:22:57.480 --> 0:22:59.960
<v Speaker 2>It might take longer to like type that into your browser.

0:23:00.119 --> 0:23:03.040
<v Speaker 2>Actually did do exactly, Tony. We appreciate the time. Is

0:23:03.040 --> 0:23:06.600
<v Speaker 2>always excited about the Scottsdale line. This is the thing

0:23:06.640 --> 0:23:14.080
<v Speaker 2>Forking Ground's podcast. Mm hmmmm hmm