1 00:00:00,320 --> 00:00:02,920 Speaker 1: This year, as you consider gifts that will be appreciated 2 00:00:03,040 --> 00:00:06,080 Speaker 1: long after they're unwrapped. What could be better than giving 3 00:00:06,080 --> 00:00:08,440 Speaker 1: the gift a better sleep? And now's a great time 4 00:00:08,480 --> 00:00:11,360 Speaker 1: to visit a Sleep Number store, where for this week 5 00:00:11,400 --> 00:00:14,920 Speaker 1: only you can say fifty percent on the Ultimate Limited 6 00:00:15,080 --> 00:00:18,759 Speaker 1: Edition bed with sleep i Q technology and Queen Mattresses 7 00:00:18,800 --> 00:00:21,919 Speaker 1: started only six ninety nine ninety nine and did you 8 00:00:22,000 --> 00:00:25,959 Speaker 1: know nine out of ten couples disagree on mattress firmness. 9 00:00:26,320 --> 00:00:28,800 Speaker 1: My Sleep Number setting is ninety. My sleep i Q 10 00:00:28,960 --> 00:00:32,240 Speaker 1: score last night was eighty two. Sleep Number beds cost 11 00:00:32,280 --> 00:00:35,760 Speaker 1: about the same as a traditional mattress, last twice as long, 12 00:00:35,800 --> 00:00:38,760 Speaker 1: and ninety one percent of the owners recommend come in 13 00:00:38,880 --> 00:00:41,960 Speaker 1: during the Ultimate Sleep Number Week now through Monday and 14 00:00:42,000 --> 00:00:45,280 Speaker 1: say fifty percent on the Ultimate Limited Edition bed with 15 00:00:45,479 --> 00:00:48,519 Speaker 1: sleep i Q Technology. You'll only find Sleep Number at 16 00:00:48,560 --> 00:00:51,800 Speaker 1: any of their five hundred and fifty Sleep Number stores nationwide. 17 00:00:52,159 --> 00:00:54,720 Speaker 1: Find one near you called one eight hundred three nine 18 00:00:54,800 --> 00:00:57,720 Speaker 1: zero ninety one hundred and be sure to tell them 19 00:00:58,080 --> 00:01:02,320 Speaker 1: George Norri sent you. Now Here's a highlight from Coast 20 00:01:02,320 --> 00:01:06,080 Speaker 1: to Coast AM on iHeart Radio and welcome back to 21 00:01:06,160 --> 00:01:09,000 Speaker 1: Coast to Coast with John produce our special guest here, 22 00:01:09,000 --> 00:01:11,280 Speaker 1: the Ghost of Langley. John. You had mentioned earlier that 23 00:01:11,400 --> 00:01:14,840 Speaker 1: JFK ironically we're coming up on the fifty fourth anniversary 24 00:01:14,880 --> 00:01:18,720 Speaker 1: of his assassination, that he is a c I a ghost. 25 00:01:18,800 --> 00:01:22,720 Speaker 1: What do you mean by that? Uh? In the same 26 00:01:22,800 --> 00:01:29,160 Speaker 1: way that the examples of these officers at the Agency 27 00:01:29,160 --> 00:01:36,520 Speaker 1: become spirits, become ghosts that impact on the behavior of 28 00:01:36,720 --> 00:01:44,200 Speaker 1: their successors. Here we have a president who's um actions 29 00:01:44,360 --> 00:01:48,560 Speaker 1: were so far over the top with respect to his 30 00:01:48,840 --> 00:01:55,800 Speaker 1: this one particular opponent of his um that people still 31 00:01:55,880 --> 00:01:59,400 Speaker 1: think fifty four years later, maybe with the Cubans that 32 00:01:59,520 --> 00:02:04,920 Speaker 1: went after him. So um, that's an example for future 33 00:02:05,000 --> 00:02:08,880 Speaker 1: presidents who think, back, oh my god, Kennedy got shot. 34 00:02:08,919 --> 00:02:12,240 Speaker 1: What am I going to do. It's also an example 35 00:02:12,440 --> 00:02:17,840 Speaker 1: for people working on covert operations at the Agency, Oh 36 00:02:17,840 --> 00:02:21,760 Speaker 1: my god, if we are going to do this operation, Uh, 37 00:02:21,960 --> 00:02:26,600 Speaker 1: is it going to threaten the president? Um? So on 38 00:02:26,680 --> 00:02:33,320 Speaker 1: a certain level. And again, this is not um This 39 00:02:33,480 --> 00:02:36,640 Speaker 1: is an extrapolation from what's in the Ghost of Langley. 40 00:02:36,680 --> 00:02:40,440 Speaker 1: This is not actually part of the content of that book. 41 00:02:40,480 --> 00:02:42,360 Speaker 1: But there's a level on which you can read the 42 00:02:42,440 --> 00:02:48,359 Speaker 1: evidence to say that Kennedy is a ghost. Can the 43 00:02:48,440 --> 00:02:54,160 Speaker 1: c I A in your opinion, John, be fixed? And 44 00:02:54,240 --> 00:03:01,640 Speaker 1: should it be fixed? Um? Ken of the actually here 45 00:03:01,800 --> 00:03:05,880 Speaker 1: comes back? You know. He uh created an entity that's 46 00:03:05,919 --> 00:03:10,880 Speaker 1: called the was called the President's Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board, 47 00:03:11,080 --> 00:03:15,760 Speaker 1: and this entity still exists today as the Foreign Intelligence 48 00:03:15,800 --> 00:03:19,440 Speaker 1: Advisory Board, and it's a White House watchdog group that 49 00:03:19,520 --> 00:03:24,239 Speaker 1: looks at intelligence. And in the summer of nineteen sixty one, 50 00:03:24,440 --> 00:03:29,120 Speaker 1: after the Bay of Pigs, in fact, Kennedy's Foreign Intelligence 51 00:03:29,120 --> 00:03:35,800 Speaker 1: Advisory Board proposed that exact thing, let's break up the CIA. Uh. 52 00:03:35,920 --> 00:03:39,120 Speaker 1: The CIA at that time was moving, you know, it 53 00:03:39,160 --> 00:03:41,400 Speaker 1: was about to move to the house that Allen dull 54 00:03:41,560 --> 00:03:45,880 Speaker 1: Is built out in Langley, Virginia, and the Foreign Intelligence 55 00:03:45,880 --> 00:03:50,200 Speaker 1: Advisory Group had a fallback position, which was that, well, 56 00:03:50,920 --> 00:03:56,240 Speaker 1: let's not let the covert operators move the CIA's operations director, 57 00:03:56,240 --> 00:03:59,440 Speaker 1: which shouldn't go to Langley. We can send them someplace else. 58 00:04:00,120 --> 00:04:03,080 Speaker 1: And I think some of them thought by doing this, 59 00:04:03,640 --> 00:04:08,960 Speaker 1: they decouple the CIA from its operations director and then 60 00:04:09,000 --> 00:04:12,480 Speaker 1: the operations director, it can be led to a trophy 61 00:04:12,560 --> 00:04:19,479 Speaker 1: by itself. You don't think ahead, no, no, finish up. Um. 62 00:04:19,640 --> 00:04:23,000 Speaker 1: I don't think that's possible today, No, I don't need 63 00:04:23,760 --> 00:04:30,160 Speaker 1: I think today the CIA's Operations Directorate UM actually has 64 00:04:30,200 --> 00:04:35,680 Speaker 1: a much different function. It's feeder line for what the 65 00:04:35,839 --> 00:04:40,800 Speaker 1: agency is calling mission centers. And these mission centers all 66 00:04:40,920 --> 00:04:46,880 Speaker 1: have particular orientations and particular goals. For example, there's a 67 00:04:46,920 --> 00:04:50,080 Speaker 1: mission center for North Korea and there's a mission center 68 00:04:50,120 --> 00:04:57,200 Speaker 1: for Iran, and they're all operations oriented. UM. And because 69 00:04:57,279 --> 00:05:01,359 Speaker 1: of that, and because CIA and Analysis is now running 70 00:05:01,680 --> 00:05:06,080 Speaker 1: to support operations directly and not as a way of 71 00:05:06,160 --> 00:05:10,640 Speaker 1: understanding of the world, UM, the CIA is less capable 72 00:05:10,680 --> 00:05:13,600 Speaker 1: of getting itself out of this trouble that it is 73 00:05:14,400 --> 00:05:19,279 Speaker 1: uh sort of gotten itself into. So that leads to 74 00:05:19,320 --> 00:05:24,480 Speaker 1: the question of should the CIA be dismantled, and if 75 00:05:24,520 --> 00:05:30,760 Speaker 1: it were, what could replace it? Because as I said earlier, 76 00:05:30,839 --> 00:05:33,200 Speaker 1: you know, I think you have to have you have 77 00:05:33,240 --> 00:05:37,920 Speaker 1: to have some entity like this. But UM, I think 78 00:05:37,920 --> 00:05:42,880 Speaker 1: what we've done is let this let this organization become 79 00:05:43,080 --> 00:05:50,320 Speaker 1: too operationally oriented. We spoke briefly about the Mossad. One 80 00:05:50,600 --> 00:05:53,800 Speaker 1: of the drawbacks that the Mossad has is that it's 81 00:05:53,880 --> 00:05:58,799 Speaker 1: too operationally oriented. And I think we're letting our CIA 82 00:05:58,920 --> 00:06:03,160 Speaker 1: get into that kind of a situation, which is inherently 83 00:06:03,279 --> 00:06:07,880 Speaker 1: dangerous and which now we are lacking the safety net 84 00:06:07,960 --> 00:06:10,960 Speaker 1: that could have supported the agency when it got into 85 00:06:11,000 --> 00:06:15,840 Speaker 1: trouble with With everything that's been happening with the CIA 86 00:06:16,320 --> 00:06:19,640 Speaker 1: in the past and in the future, how would you 87 00:06:19,680 --> 00:06:23,600 Speaker 1: compare what they do with China? And what is China's 88 00:06:24,279 --> 00:06:30,880 Speaker 1: agency called? The Chinese Agency is an artifact of the 89 00:06:31,000 --> 00:06:37,160 Speaker 1: Ministry of Security UM, and it has UH alpha numeric 90 00:06:37,400 --> 00:06:44,000 Speaker 1: designators for different sections. It's a pot pourri, really, and 91 00:06:44,440 --> 00:06:50,760 Speaker 1: I can't describe to you much about the the the 92 00:06:50,960 --> 00:06:55,359 Speaker 1: organization of the entity of Chinese intelligence. Much of what 93 00:06:55,480 --> 00:06:59,640 Speaker 1: we know about Chinese intelligence is based simply on what 94 00:06:59,720 --> 00:07:03,360 Speaker 1: we know about what they've attempted to do. For example, 95 00:07:04,000 --> 00:07:09,800 Speaker 1: the hacking of the UH the White House Officer of 96 00:07:09,840 --> 00:07:13,800 Speaker 1: Personnel Management. A few years ago or a few years 97 00:07:13,840 --> 00:07:18,720 Speaker 1: before that, there was a case in which Chinese agents 98 00:07:18,800 --> 00:07:25,120 Speaker 1: had suborned UM, an FBI H middle level official out 99 00:07:25,160 --> 00:07:29,840 Speaker 1: in California or UH in certain other instances. There was 100 00:07:29,880 --> 00:07:33,320 Speaker 1: one of these in Louisiana and another one in California 101 00:07:33,840 --> 00:07:40,200 Speaker 1: where UH Chinese agents had been purchasing and otherwise acquiring 102 00:07:40,360 --> 00:07:49,200 Speaker 1: American technology and UH technological UM blueprints machine tools that 103 00:07:49,360 --> 00:07:55,239 Speaker 1: kind of thing for their industry. The California Representative Christopher Cox, 104 00:07:56,480 --> 00:08:02,080 Speaker 1: maybe middle Aughts, was concerned enough about this that he 105 00:08:02,080 --> 00:08:06,920 Speaker 1: held hearings and produced what is probably the most comprehensive 106 00:08:07,640 --> 00:08:14,000 Speaker 1: view of what Chinese intelligence is doing and wants from 107 00:08:14,040 --> 00:08:18,360 Speaker 1: the United States. And I mentioned that because we have 108 00:08:18,760 --> 00:08:21,480 Speaker 1: we had a similar debate in the nineteen eighties, this 109 00:08:21,560 --> 00:08:26,760 Speaker 1: time about the Russians and the KGB, where UM, the 110 00:08:26,880 --> 00:08:31,920 Speaker 1: KGB had a department that was just in charge of 111 00:08:32,040 --> 00:08:38,760 Speaker 1: UH sort of procuring foreign technologies and UH things that 112 00:08:38,840 --> 00:08:43,480 Speaker 1: could be used to enhance the Soviet economy. But in 113 00:08:43,559 --> 00:08:48,200 Speaker 1: any case, UH, when analyzes were done about what was 114 00:08:48,280 --> 00:08:55,119 Speaker 1: the impact of these foreign technological acquisitions on the Soviet economy, 115 00:08:55,679 --> 00:08:58,800 Speaker 1: what the analysts came up with is that the impact 116 00:08:58,880 --> 00:09:04,360 Speaker 1: actually is relatively minor because their economy was so big, 117 00:09:04,640 --> 00:09:09,040 Speaker 1: and because the relative value of the foreign technology that 118 00:09:09,120 --> 00:09:12,920 Speaker 1: they were requiring was limited. And I think you can 119 00:09:12,960 --> 00:09:16,240 Speaker 1: apply that same argument to the case of China. The 120 00:09:16,400 --> 00:09:24,400 Speaker 1: Chinese UH economy is so large today that the differential 121 00:09:24,640 --> 00:09:30,680 Speaker 1: that's added to it by their foreign espionage is limited. 122 00:09:31,600 --> 00:09:34,000 Speaker 1: Having said that, I will tell you that if you 123 00:09:34,120 --> 00:09:39,000 Speaker 1: looked at a set of the latest line of Chinese weapons, 124 00:09:39,120 --> 00:09:43,760 Speaker 1: you know, the fighter and the aircraft carrier, and the 125 00:09:43,920 --> 00:09:48,640 Speaker 1: new rocket and whatnot. UM A lot of their front 126 00:09:48,679 --> 00:09:53,120 Speaker 1: line technology, new self propelled artillery guns, new fighter jets 127 00:09:53,559 --> 00:09:59,959 Speaker 1: look an awful lot like ours. Absolutely, if you were 128 00:10:00,040 --> 00:10:05,600 Speaker 1: running the CIA today, John, what would you do? UM? 129 00:10:05,720 --> 00:10:08,600 Speaker 1: I would move away from this mission center idea that 130 00:10:08,640 --> 00:10:12,920 Speaker 1: they've got and UH actually attempt to recreate a more 131 00:10:12,960 --> 00:10:17,920 Speaker 1: traditional director of operations, and I would UM very much 132 00:10:18,080 --> 00:10:26,079 Speaker 1: enhance the agency's analytical capability. We're in a environment today 133 00:10:26,120 --> 00:10:32,040 Speaker 1: in which actually the terror war thing is really a 134 00:10:32,240 --> 00:10:38,319 Speaker 1: smaller part of our security problem. Our security problem needs 135 00:10:38,360 --> 00:10:42,760 Speaker 1: to look at the effects of climate change on national 136 00:10:42,880 --> 00:10:48,400 Speaker 1: behavior and people's behavior. The UH changes that are going 137 00:10:48,440 --> 00:10:53,760 Speaker 1: to be wrought in international behavior by things like the 138 00:10:53,960 --> 00:11:00,320 Speaker 1: scarcity of water UH. The kinds of activity is on 139 00:11:00,400 --> 00:11:04,599 Speaker 1: the parts of people that are going to be fueled 140 00:11:05,000 --> 00:11:12,560 Speaker 1: by their desperation and their dependence on various UH kinds 141 00:11:12,600 --> 00:11:21,160 Speaker 1: of products or um UH or their their actual geographic situations. 142 00:11:21,880 --> 00:11:25,400 Speaker 1: And these are the things increasingly I think that are 143 00:11:25,440 --> 00:11:29,920 Speaker 1: going to be fueling behavior both non state actors and 144 00:11:30,080 --> 00:11:33,640 Speaker 1: from nation states, and the CIA needs to be in 145 00:11:33,640 --> 00:11:38,920 Speaker 1: a position to understand those developments and to anticipate them, 146 00:11:39,000 --> 00:11:42,760 Speaker 1: and that's the way you protect American national security. Good point. 147 00:11:43,160 --> 00:11:46,400 Speaker 1: Listen to more Coast to Coast AM every weeknight at 148 00:11:46,440 --> 00:11:49,000 Speaker 1: one a m. Eastern and go to Coast to Coast 149 00:11:49,040 --> 00:11:50,440 Speaker 1: am dot com for more