WEBVTT - #296 Guest Host Chris Fabricant with Gilbert Poole

0:00:00.320 --> 0:00:03.559
<v Speaker 1>I'm Jason Flamm, host of Wrongful Conviction, but this week,

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:06.880
<v Speaker 1>instead of hearing me, I've invited a true genius from

0:00:06.880 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>the legal world to bring their knowledge and expertise to

0:00:10.160 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 1>the conversation as guest host here at Wrongful Conviction. We

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:16.840
<v Speaker 1>believe that sharing the stories of the incarcerated innocent can

0:00:16.880 --> 0:00:20.400
<v Speaker 1>create real change in the world, even beyond what these

0:00:20.440 --> 0:00:23.000
<v Speaker 1>real life legal superheroes do every day.

0:00:27.080 --> 0:00:30.440
<v Speaker 2>On June seventh, nineteen eighty eight, joggers were out on

0:00:30.480 --> 0:00:33.440
<v Speaker 2>a wooded trail in Pontiai, Michigan when they discovered the

0:00:33.479 --> 0:00:36.680
<v Speaker 2>body of thirty five year old Robert Mihia. He had

0:00:36.720 --> 0:00:40.239
<v Speaker 2>been stabbed to death. Mahia was last seen at a

0:00:40.280 --> 0:00:42.400
<v Speaker 2>bar a couple of nights before, and he left.

0:00:42.240 --> 0:00:42.960
<v Speaker 3>With a stranger.

0:00:43.720 --> 0:00:47.480
<v Speaker 2>Witnesses described that person to police, who created a composite

0:00:47.520 --> 0:00:49.720
<v Speaker 2>sketch and published it in the local newspaper.

0:00:50.280 --> 0:00:51.880
<v Speaker 3>There were no other leads.

0:00:52.920 --> 0:00:55.760
<v Speaker 2>Connie Cook lived in Pontiac back then, and when she

0:00:55.840 --> 0:00:58.760
<v Speaker 2>saw the suspect sketch and heard about the reward money,

0:00:59.080 --> 0:01:02.200
<v Speaker 2>she decided to turn in her ex boyfriend, Gilbert Pool.

0:01:02.960 --> 0:01:05.720
<v Speaker 2>She told police he'd confessed to a murder shortly before

0:01:05.760 --> 0:01:09.400
<v Speaker 2>they moved together to North Carolina. Police went to North

0:01:09.400 --> 0:01:12.120
<v Speaker 2>Carolina and arrested Gilbert and took him back to Michigan

0:01:12.200 --> 0:01:15.480
<v Speaker 2>for trial. Among the other evidence that was presented, the

0:01:15.520 --> 0:01:19.360
<v Speaker 2>state called forensic identologist doctor Alan Warnick to explain the

0:01:19.400 --> 0:01:23.720
<v Speaker 2>supposed bitemark found on the victim's body. Even at the time,

0:01:23.840 --> 0:01:25.959
<v Speaker 2>there was a suspicion of this type of junk science,

0:01:26.000 --> 0:01:29.520
<v Speaker 2>but doctor Warnick's testimony was presented to Gilbert's jury as

0:01:29.680 --> 0:01:34.160
<v Speaker 2>scientific fact. Gilbert looked nothing like the suspect's sketch, and

0:01:34.200 --> 0:01:36.479
<v Speaker 2>his blood type did not match any of the blood

0:01:36.560 --> 0:01:40.560
<v Speaker 2>found near the victim's body. But on June sixth, nineteen

0:01:40.600 --> 0:01:44.760
<v Speaker 2>eighty nine, Gilbert Poole was convicted of murder sentenced to

0:01:44.800 --> 0:01:47.200
<v Speaker 2>life in prison without the possibility of parole.

0:01:48.640 --> 0:01:49.960
<v Speaker 3>This is wrongful conviction.

0:02:00.920 --> 0:02:01.040
<v Speaker 4>Hi.

0:02:01.080 --> 0:02:04.560
<v Speaker 3>I'm Chris Fabricat. I'm the director of Strategic Litigation at

0:02:04.600 --> 0:02:07.360
<v Speaker 3>the Innocence Project in New York and author of the

0:02:07.400 --> 0:02:10.600
<v Speaker 3>book Junk Science and the American Criminal Justice System.

0:02:11.560 --> 0:02:15.600
<v Speaker 5>Hello, my name is Gilbert Poole. I was recently exonerated

0:02:15.680 --> 0:02:19.040
<v Speaker 5>through the Innocence Project and the Conviction Integrity Unit in

0:02:19.040 --> 0:02:19.880
<v Speaker 5>the state of Michigan.

0:02:20.240 --> 0:02:23.919
<v Speaker 4>Hi, I'm Marla Mitchell Sisian and I'm the former director

0:02:24.000 --> 0:02:29.120
<v Speaker 4>of the WMU Cooley Innocence Project and currently serving of

0:02:29.240 --> 0:02:30.680
<v Speaker 4>council with the office.

0:02:31.040 --> 0:02:31.919
<v Speaker 3>And mister Poole.

0:02:32.040 --> 0:02:34.040
<v Speaker 2>Tell us how you got involved in the criminal legal

0:02:34.080 --> 0:02:36.320
<v Speaker 2>system and what led to your original conviction.

0:02:37.160 --> 0:02:40.919
<v Speaker 5>I was briefly living in Michigan. I moved from Michigan

0:02:40.960 --> 0:02:45.040
<v Speaker 5>back down in North Carolina in nineteen eighty eight, and

0:02:45.120 --> 0:02:48.040
<v Speaker 5>I met a girl up here in Michigan and she

0:02:48.160 --> 0:02:52.520
<v Speaker 5>went with me back down in North Carolina. Subsequently, our

0:02:52.560 --> 0:02:56.600
<v Speaker 5>relationship ended and we broke up. She came back to Michigan.

0:02:57.760 --> 0:03:00.360
<v Speaker 5>Unbeknownst to me, she had went to the police down

0:03:00.400 --> 0:03:03.600
<v Speaker 5>there and told them that I had committed a crime

0:03:03.639 --> 0:03:04.200
<v Speaker 5>in Michigan.

0:03:04.800 --> 0:03:08.040
<v Speaker 3>And this was out of nowhere. Had you been to

0:03:08.120 --> 0:03:12.880
<v Speaker 3>Pontiac and did you think that your girlfriend might say

0:03:12.919 --> 0:03:14.119
<v Speaker 3>something like this about you.

0:03:14.960 --> 0:03:18.320
<v Speaker 5>I was twenty two years old and I was working

0:03:18.320 --> 0:03:21.960
<v Speaker 5>as a plumber in North Carolina doing plumbing repair work.

0:03:22.120 --> 0:03:25.560
<v Speaker 5>I was briefly living in Michigan. I had moved up

0:03:25.560 --> 0:03:29.280
<v Speaker 5>here from North Carolina, but I found it hard to

0:03:29.360 --> 0:03:31.920
<v Speaker 5>maintain employment up here because I was not from the

0:03:32.000 --> 0:03:35.760
<v Speaker 5>state and it's a union state. You had to establish

0:03:35.800 --> 0:03:38.040
<v Speaker 5>a five year residency in the state before you could

0:03:38.080 --> 0:03:42.280
<v Speaker 5>join the union. So I decided this wasn't a place

0:03:42.280 --> 0:03:44.440
<v Speaker 5>for me, and I moved back to North Carolina. My

0:03:44.520 --> 0:03:48.880
<v Speaker 5>girlfriend and I, Connie Cook. When we separated. It wasn't

0:03:48.880 --> 0:03:53.600
<v Speaker 5>a friendly separation, to put it lately, and I didn't

0:03:53.600 --> 0:03:56.400
<v Speaker 5>think it was beyond her to make up something, but

0:03:56.480 --> 0:04:00.200
<v Speaker 5>I didn't think it was to this degree or here.

0:04:01.520 --> 0:04:04.480
<v Speaker 5>After we had separated, I was out working and I

0:04:04.560 --> 0:04:07.960
<v Speaker 5>came home from work one day and my door was open.

0:04:08.160 --> 0:04:11.120
<v Speaker 5>Everything in the mobile home was gone, and I thought, well, okay,

0:04:11.280 --> 0:04:13.920
<v Speaker 5>she came back and stole everything I had. There's no

0:04:14.000 --> 0:04:16.200
<v Speaker 5>note or anything, but that's okay. If she needed that,

0:04:16.200 --> 0:04:20.400
<v Speaker 5>that's fine. Moving on. It wasn't until a couple of

0:04:20.440 --> 0:04:24.279
<v Speaker 5>weeks later that the police came to my workplace and

0:04:24.360 --> 0:04:28.480
<v Speaker 5>serve me with this warrant, and then everything made sense. Then, oh, okay,

0:04:29.480 --> 0:04:34.000
<v Speaker 5>she used me to basically get a ride back to

0:04:34.080 --> 0:04:38.679
<v Speaker 5>Michigan and claim a reward that was open for a

0:04:38.760 --> 0:04:43.560
<v Speaker 5>murder case that was unsolved in Michigan. She has me

0:04:43.680 --> 0:04:46.839
<v Speaker 5>confessing to a murder six months before it actually happened.

0:04:47.160 --> 0:04:48.000
<v Speaker 3>It's a problem.

0:04:48.560 --> 0:04:50.919
<v Speaker 5>They took her in and they gave her a polygraph test,

0:04:51.279 --> 0:04:56.240
<v Speaker 5>so she worked with the polygraph examiner until they came

0:04:56.360 --> 0:04:58.040
<v Speaker 5>up with a test that she could pass.

0:04:58.680 --> 0:05:01.799
<v Speaker 3>Well, let's bring in Marla talk a little bit about

0:05:02.080 --> 0:05:05.480
<v Speaker 3>the crime that mister Pool really had no idea what

0:05:05.520 --> 0:05:08.080
<v Speaker 3>the details were. Marla, can you tell us a little

0:05:08.120 --> 0:05:11.040
<v Speaker 3>bit about the crime that mister Poole was ultimately charged with.

0:05:11.720 --> 0:05:17.160
<v Speaker 4>Yes, So, mister Poole was convicted of murdering a man

0:05:17.240 --> 0:05:24.680
<v Speaker 4>in Pontiac, Michigan. And mister Mieha was actually pretty well

0:05:24.720 --> 0:05:28.479
<v Speaker 4>known in the Pontiac community at that time. He had

0:05:28.520 --> 0:05:31.320
<v Speaker 4>worked for Pontiac and he had worked for the county

0:05:31.880 --> 0:05:35.960
<v Speaker 4>in a variety of government jobs, and he was actually

0:05:36.680 --> 0:05:41.839
<v Speaker 4>pretty popular individual at the time. He was living what

0:05:41.920 --> 0:05:43.919
<v Speaker 4>would have been considered at that time sort of a

0:05:43.960 --> 0:05:47.760
<v Speaker 4>double life, meaning he was a gay man in Pontiac,

0:05:47.839 --> 0:05:51.599
<v Speaker 4>Michigan in nineteen eighty eight, and he frequented a gay bar,

0:05:51.920 --> 0:05:55.679
<v Speaker 4>which was the last place he was seen alive. So

0:05:56.120 --> 0:06:01.080
<v Speaker 4>Miha had left with a stranger that evening. Stranger, through

0:06:01.120 --> 0:06:04.960
<v Speaker 4>the narrative, became mister Poole. Gil became a suspect when

0:06:04.960 --> 0:06:09.400
<v Speaker 4>his ex girlfriend Connie Cook said, I have information about

0:06:09.400 --> 0:06:13.039
<v Speaker 4>a murder which at that point in time when she

0:06:13.240 --> 0:06:17.960
<v Speaker 4>came forward the murder, the case of gone cold for

0:06:18.000 --> 0:06:20.680
<v Speaker 4>about seven or eight months, and that's when mister Pool

0:06:20.760 --> 0:06:21.760
<v Speaker 4>became the suspect.

0:06:22.880 --> 0:06:27.560
<v Speaker 3>And so, mister Poole, tell us about when you first

0:06:27.640 --> 0:06:32.279
<v Speaker 3>learned that you weren't just going to be able to

0:06:32.320 --> 0:06:34.560
<v Speaker 3>take care of this quick and go back to work.

0:06:34.920 --> 0:06:38.000
<v Speaker 3>What was the first moment where you recognized that you

0:06:38.040 --> 0:06:42.240
<v Speaker 3>were beginning a long, slow slide into the criminal justice system.

0:06:42.960 --> 0:06:46.880
<v Speaker 5>After I got back to Michigan things, Yeah, we really

0:06:46.920 --> 0:06:51.880
<v Speaker 5>were setting in back in Oakland County jail. The investigator

0:06:51.920 --> 0:06:59.080
<v Speaker 5>started taking samples from me, hair samples, blood samples, bite impressions,

0:07:01.120 --> 0:07:02.120
<v Speaker 5>dental molds.

0:07:02.360 --> 0:07:05.279
<v Speaker 3>A dental mold. We'll definitely get to the dental mold.

0:07:05.360 --> 0:07:07.719
<v Speaker 3>So they were starting to cook up the junk science

0:07:07.800 --> 0:07:08.279
<v Speaker 3>right away.

0:07:08.839 --> 0:07:13.280
<v Speaker 5>Yeah. Yeah, And I hired an attorney in Michigan who

0:07:13.280 --> 0:07:17.040
<v Speaker 5>contacted me once. While I was introduced to the county jail.

0:07:17.920 --> 0:07:21.800
<v Speaker 5>They had composite drawings ran in a newspaper that was

0:07:21.840 --> 0:07:24.640
<v Speaker 5>not me. He showed me the newspaper he said, look,

0:07:24.680 --> 0:07:26.640
<v Speaker 5>this is the paper that they had. It doesn't even

0:07:26.680 --> 0:07:29.600
<v Speaker 5>match you. It's not even close. And it was just

0:07:31.000 --> 0:07:35.160
<v Speaker 5>a matter of a beneful girlfriend and started a process

0:07:35.200 --> 0:07:36.600
<v Speaker 5>that we're just going to have to take care of.

0:07:36.720 --> 0:07:39.520
<v Speaker 5>But not to worry he was seeing. He seemed to

0:07:39.560 --> 0:07:41.920
<v Speaker 5>be kind of nonchalant about it. So it was kind

0:07:41.960 --> 0:07:44.840
<v Speaker 5>of calling to me a little bit. But as Tom

0:07:44.920 --> 0:07:49.000
<v Speaker 5>moved on in the months in the county jail, crep

0:07:49.080 --> 0:07:53.560
<v Speaker 5>up on me and then it became a lot more serious.

0:07:54.040 --> 0:07:56.480
<v Speaker 3>Marlin, let me bring you in to talk a little

0:07:56.480 --> 0:07:58.720
<v Speaker 3>bit about the investigation that was going on, where this

0:07:58.840 --> 0:08:01.960
<v Speaker 3>composite sketch came from, and who the people were that

0:08:02.080 --> 0:08:06.800
<v Speaker 3>saw the victim on the night the victim was murdered.

0:08:07.520 --> 0:08:10.560
<v Speaker 4>Yes, so the victim was a regular at this bar

0:08:10.920 --> 0:08:14.800
<v Speaker 4>and most of the patrons were individuals that were either

0:08:14.880 --> 0:08:19.120
<v Speaker 4>his friends or knew him. And so obviously one of

0:08:19.200 --> 0:08:21.800
<v Speaker 4>the first things that the police did to investigate this

0:08:21.960 --> 0:08:24.320
<v Speaker 4>case is to interview everyone that was in the bar

0:08:24.640 --> 0:08:28.920
<v Speaker 4>that evening, and they all provided descriptions, and there were

0:08:28.960 --> 0:08:33.560
<v Speaker 4>two composite drawings that came out in the local newspaper,

0:08:33.679 --> 0:08:38.240
<v Speaker 4>the Oakland Press, and as mister Poole stated, they didn't

0:08:38.280 --> 0:08:42.800
<v Speaker 4>look anything like mister Pool. Unfortunately, when Connie Cook served

0:08:42.880 --> 0:08:46.440
<v Speaker 4>mister Poole up on a silver platter. What the government

0:08:46.520 --> 0:08:50.240
<v Speaker 4>did and what the police investigation did is it focused

0:08:50.280 --> 0:08:55.559
<v Speaker 4>then on mister Pool. This problem was compounded because instead

0:08:55.760 --> 0:08:59.440
<v Speaker 4>of the composites that were published in the newspaper a

0:08:59.480 --> 0:09:04.760
<v Speaker 4>week after or the murder, the government produced new drawings.

0:09:05.600 --> 0:09:08.959
<v Speaker 4>We to this day do not know where they came from,

0:09:09.559 --> 0:09:16.480
<v Speaker 4>and they proceeded to suggest to the witnesses and the

0:09:16.600 --> 0:09:20.040
<v Speaker 4>jury that these were the drawings that were in the newspaper,

0:09:20.520 --> 0:09:26.200
<v Speaker 4>and those drawings looked exactly like mister Poole Wow. In fact,

0:09:26.280 --> 0:09:30.559
<v Speaker 4>to this day, I personally believe that they drew those

0:09:30.640 --> 0:09:35.760
<v Speaker 4>drawings from photographs that they obtained through their investigation.

0:09:36.920 --> 0:09:42.600
<v Speaker 3>So they took a new sketch and essentially painted a

0:09:42.600 --> 0:09:48.319
<v Speaker 3>bullseye around their new target and got their identification that way. No,

0:09:48.440 --> 0:09:52.480
<v Speaker 3>and we all know that eyewitness misidentification as a leading

0:09:52.520 --> 0:09:56.760
<v Speaker 3>contributing factor to wrongful conviction. It's played a role in

0:09:56.880 --> 0:10:00.720
<v Speaker 3>nearly seventy percent of all convictions that and overturned by

0:10:00.800 --> 0:10:07.480
<v Speaker 3>DNA evidence. But usually those are honest mistakes by well

0:10:07.520 --> 0:10:12.480
<v Speaker 3>intentioned actors that are using a suggestive lineup. It's usually

0:10:12.480 --> 0:10:19.400
<v Speaker 3>not manipulating an image to gain an identification. Mister Pool

0:10:19.440 --> 0:10:21.520
<v Speaker 3>were you aware that this was going on at the time.

0:10:21.720 --> 0:10:27.040
<v Speaker 5>Absolutely. I was poking my lawyer in the side. I said, listen,

0:10:27.080 --> 0:10:32.160
<v Speaker 5>object to this, and he did a very poor job

0:10:32.800 --> 0:10:36.240
<v Speaker 5>during trial of getting to the bottom of the composite

0:10:36.400 --> 0:10:42.160
<v Speaker 5>drawing switcheroo that they that they came to. And I

0:10:42.200 --> 0:10:46.240
<v Speaker 5>wanted to jump in when you said misidentification. This was

0:10:46.280 --> 0:10:51.680
<v Speaker 5>not a misidentification. This was absolutely a fabrication. A miss

0:10:52.000 --> 0:10:57.120
<v Speaker 5>identification suggests that somebody made a mistake. I don't think

0:10:57.160 --> 0:10:59.720
<v Speaker 5>there were any mistakes made here. I think this was

0:11:00.520 --> 0:11:03.520
<v Speaker 5>planned out and intentional. And if you look at it

0:11:03.559 --> 0:11:08.160
<v Speaker 5>from that perspective, all the puzzles fit like they orchestrated

0:11:08.200 --> 0:11:10.400
<v Speaker 5>this whole thing to get a conviction. Yeah.

0:11:10.440 --> 0:11:13.600
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, you know. I mean, and I didn't mean to

0:11:13.600 --> 0:11:15.680
<v Speaker 3>suggest that there was some sort of a mistake, you know.

0:11:15.960 --> 0:11:18.960
<v Speaker 3>I just hadn't heard something like a new composite spetch

0:11:19.000 --> 0:11:22.120
<v Speaker 3>to match the suspect before. And I've been around the block,

0:11:22.320 --> 0:11:25.560
<v Speaker 3>so that's a new one for me, you know. And

0:11:25.559 --> 0:11:27.240
<v Speaker 3>then we're going to bring in the junk science in

0:11:27.280 --> 0:11:29.319
<v Speaker 3>a minute. But I want to just go back, Marli,

0:11:29.360 --> 0:11:31.079
<v Speaker 3>if you could just talk a little bit about how

0:11:31.080 --> 0:11:34.520
<v Speaker 3>the victim was discovered and some of the evidence that

0:11:34.720 --> 0:11:37.400
<v Speaker 3>was alledgs to have been found on the victim's body

0:11:37.440 --> 0:11:39.439
<v Speaker 3>and ultimately associated with mister Poole.

0:11:40.360 --> 0:11:44.800
<v Speaker 4>Sure the victim left the bar at closing time on

0:11:44.880 --> 0:11:49.120
<v Speaker 4>a Sunday night Monday morning, and the next day he

0:11:49.200 --> 0:11:53.240
<v Speaker 4>failed to show up for work and towards the end

0:11:53.240 --> 0:11:57.319
<v Speaker 4>of that day this was very out of character for him.

0:11:57.679 --> 0:12:01.680
<v Speaker 4>He was considered a missing person and he was discovered

0:12:01.720 --> 0:12:04.079
<v Speaker 4>on a running path by two runners who were out

0:12:04.080 --> 0:12:06.760
<v Speaker 4>for an early morning run, and of course they called

0:12:06.760 --> 0:12:12.679
<v Speaker 4>the police immediately. They identified his body rather quickly and

0:12:14.000 --> 0:12:18.520
<v Speaker 4>when they took him. When they arrived at the crime scene,

0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:20.600
<v Speaker 4>there was a lot of blood because he had been

0:12:20.640 --> 0:12:26.040
<v Speaker 4>stabbed to death, but there was also less concentrated blood

0:12:26.200 --> 0:12:31.160
<v Speaker 4>around the body, so they as a result, they collected

0:12:31.200 --> 0:12:35.960
<v Speaker 4>some blood droplets from some stones and some grass near

0:12:36.040 --> 0:12:42.679
<v Speaker 4>the body. This is another actually extremely heartbreaking piece of

0:12:42.720 --> 0:12:47.640
<v Speaker 4>this case in terms of having this information back in

0:12:47.720 --> 0:12:51.200
<v Speaker 4>nineteen eighty eight and how it was treated. So they

0:12:51.280 --> 0:12:55.920
<v Speaker 4>used blood typing at the time, which only allows us

0:12:56.200 --> 0:13:01.720
<v Speaker 4>to put ourselves in a category of undreds, thousands, sometimes

0:13:01.760 --> 0:13:05.680
<v Speaker 4>millions of people, and they determined that the victim's blood

0:13:05.840 --> 0:13:09.720
<v Speaker 4>was oh and that there was also a foreign blood

0:13:09.720 --> 0:13:13.280
<v Speaker 4>type present B type blood, which, as we now know

0:13:14.320 --> 0:13:15.520
<v Speaker 4>mister Pool, is a B.

0:13:16.200 --> 0:13:19.480
<v Speaker 3>He was excluded from the evidence before the trial. Right,

0:13:20.320 --> 0:13:23.680
<v Speaker 3>that's what we're telling here, Right, So, mister Pool, you

0:13:23.800 --> 0:13:26.959
<v Speaker 3>have at this point you've given up all forcibly had

0:13:27.200 --> 0:13:30.120
<v Speaker 3>blood samples taken from you, hair samples taken from you,

0:13:30.200 --> 0:13:35.400
<v Speaker 3>a dental mold taken from you. You've been an identification

0:13:35.480 --> 0:13:39.520
<v Speaker 3>has been manufactured against you. Your girlfriend has falsely accused

0:13:39.520 --> 0:13:42.400
<v Speaker 3>you of a crime. You're in jail and you're about

0:13:42.440 --> 0:13:45.920
<v Speaker 3>to start trial. Tell us about when the dentist came

0:13:45.960 --> 0:13:46.640
<v Speaker 3>for your teeth.

0:13:47.160 --> 0:13:55.120
<v Speaker 5>Well, forensic odentologist, self proclaimed expert in BikeE marks came

0:13:55.320 --> 0:14:02.440
<v Speaker 5>to the county jail and took marks in wax. I

0:14:02.520 --> 0:14:07.640
<v Speaker 5>say he's self proclaimed. I guess he was certified by

0:14:07.920 --> 0:14:12.440
<v Speaker 5>a Board of American Board of Odentologists.

0:14:11.400 --> 0:14:14.040
<v Speaker 3>By foe junk scientists certified him.

0:14:14.320 --> 0:14:19.320
<v Speaker 5>Right. But the certification comes in the form of certifying

0:14:19.880 --> 0:14:25.640
<v Speaker 5>identification of remains that are unidentifiable otherwise. So if you

0:14:25.720 --> 0:14:28.200
<v Speaker 5>had a body that was burnt, and you could take

0:14:28.400 --> 0:14:32.200
<v Speaker 5>the teeth from that body and compare them to dental

0:14:32.200 --> 0:14:37.840
<v Speaker 5>records and identify that victim but to take that science

0:14:38.640 --> 0:14:41.560
<v Speaker 5>and stretch it to say, okay, well we're going to

0:14:41.640 --> 0:14:45.120
<v Speaker 5>take a bruise. It's essentially what they found on the

0:14:45.200 --> 0:14:48.840
<v Speaker 5>victim was a bruise, and I'd match it to somebody's

0:14:48.920 --> 0:14:53.400
<v Speaker 5>teeth and say those teeth matched to bruise is a

0:14:53.480 --> 0:14:59.440
<v Speaker 5>far stretch. It's not a solid substrate like wax that

0:14:59.480 --> 0:15:05.000
<v Speaker 5>they're taking my impressions from. Skin is fluid, it's movable,

0:15:05.080 --> 0:15:08.120
<v Speaker 5>it's elastic. It's going to stretch, and so you're not

0:15:08.200 --> 0:15:13.080
<v Speaker 5>going to have depth or angulation, registration, all these things

0:15:13.080 --> 0:15:16.160
<v Speaker 5>that would come into play when you're identifying.

0:15:15.560 --> 0:15:17.760
<v Speaker 3>A course bitemark.

0:15:17.760 --> 0:15:22.000
<v Speaker 2>Evidence is subject to speculation masquerading as scientific evidence. As

0:15:22.040 --> 0:15:25.280
<v Speaker 2>mister Poole just said, skin does move and it changes,

0:15:25.360 --> 0:15:27.640
<v Speaker 2>and that makes it nearly impossible to say for sure

0:15:27.680 --> 0:15:32.200
<v Speaker 2>which teeth made which marks. More fundamentally, these forensic dentists

0:15:32.200 --> 0:15:34.280
<v Speaker 2>don't even know a bite mark from any other type

0:15:34.320 --> 0:15:39.840
<v Speaker 2>of injury. And beyond that, skin changes constantly in a

0:15:39.920 --> 0:15:43.480
<v Speaker 2>decomposing body, and it changes constantly in a healing victim.

0:15:43.680 --> 0:15:46.640
<v Speaker 2>So teeth that might match one day or even one

0:15:46.680 --> 0:15:50.800
<v Speaker 2>hour might not match the next hour or the next day.

0:15:50.920 --> 0:15:54.160
<v Speaker 2>The Friends of godentologists in this case was doctor Allan Warnick,

0:15:54.320 --> 0:15:57.480
<v Speaker 2>the only one practicing in Michigan at that time. Any

0:15:57.480 --> 0:16:00.080
<v Speaker 2>good defensi lawyer is supposed to question the expert or

0:16:00.080 --> 0:16:02.680
<v Speaker 2>its credentials in front of the jury in a process

0:16:02.720 --> 0:16:05.680
<v Speaker 2>called vordere. So today, if we were listening to this

0:16:05.800 --> 0:16:08.280
<v Speaker 2>case today, if a jury was hearing this case today,

0:16:08.640 --> 0:16:11.200
<v Speaker 2>they would learn that this type of evidence that doctor

0:16:11.240 --> 0:16:15.400
<v Speaker 2>Allan Warnick was about to convict mister Poole with has

0:16:15.440 --> 0:16:19.160
<v Speaker 2>been responsible for at least thirty five known wrongful convictions

0:16:19.160 --> 0:16:21.880
<v Speaker 2>and indictments. The jury would also learn that the National

0:16:21.920 --> 0:16:26.240
<v Speaker 2>Academy of Sciences calls forensic identatology junk science and gross speculation,

0:16:26.440 --> 0:16:29.840
<v Speaker 2>as has every other scientific entity that has ever examined

0:16:30.280 --> 0:16:34.400
<v Speaker 2>this fundamental junk science. I wrote an entire book on

0:16:34.440 --> 0:16:36.720
<v Speaker 2>the subject of junk science, and I've been on another

0:16:36.760 --> 0:16:40.720
<v Speaker 2>of our podcast Junk Science, talking about the outrageous practice

0:16:40.800 --> 0:16:44.680
<v Speaker 2>of bitemark identification and matching. But let's get back to

0:16:44.720 --> 0:16:47.360
<v Speaker 2>mister Poole's case. Despite the fact that he and his

0:16:47.400 --> 0:16:50.280
<v Speaker 2>lawyer both knew that this wasn't a credible witness, doctor

0:16:50.320 --> 0:16:52.800
<v Speaker 2>Allan Warnick was nevertheless allowed to get up on the

0:16:52.800 --> 0:16:56.240
<v Speaker 2>witness stand, raise his right hand, and testify as a

0:16:56.320 --> 0:16:59.760
<v Speaker 2>so called expert practicing in a valid field of forensic

0:16:59.760 --> 0:17:00.480
<v Speaker 2>science sciences.

0:17:01.000 --> 0:17:03.600
<v Speaker 5>So when he gets on the stand and you know,

0:17:03.680 --> 0:17:06.080
<v Speaker 5>with his little white lab coat on, and says, well,

0:17:06.280 --> 0:17:09.399
<v Speaker 5>the odds of winning the lottery were better than it

0:17:09.560 --> 0:17:12.040
<v Speaker 5>not being mister Poole, That's exactly what he told the

0:17:12.119 --> 0:17:15.920
<v Speaker 5>jury word for word. So the jury hears that, which

0:17:15.960 --> 0:17:20.199
<v Speaker 5>is a personal opinion, but they're instructed to regard it

0:17:20.240 --> 0:17:23.639
<v Speaker 5>as a truth. How do I win? How do I

0:17:23.680 --> 0:17:24.200
<v Speaker 5>come back that?

0:17:37.359 --> 0:17:41.760
<v Speaker 3>So let's take us from the moment of the opening

0:17:41.800 --> 0:17:46.919
<v Speaker 3>statement and describe how you experienced your trial as this

0:17:47.080 --> 0:17:48.000
<v Speaker 3>nightmare unfolded.

0:17:49.040 --> 0:17:52.320
<v Speaker 5>I believe I'll see my attorney twice before the trial.

0:17:52.880 --> 0:17:55.760
<v Speaker 5>Both times it was less than ten minutes. He was

0:17:55.800 --> 0:17:58.879
<v Speaker 5>a paid attorney at trial. He gave me a notepad

0:17:58.920 --> 0:18:00.760
<v Speaker 5>and a piece of paper here, if you want to

0:18:00.800 --> 0:18:02.919
<v Speaker 5>make notes, just write it down and show it to me.

0:18:03.359 --> 0:18:07.879
<v Speaker 5>And I was kind of keeping score. Well, well okay,

0:18:07.920 --> 0:18:10.320
<v Speaker 5>well that didn't sound good for me. So you know

0:18:10.440 --> 0:18:14.320
<v Speaker 5>that was one against me. Well, well that didn't sound good.

0:18:14.359 --> 0:18:18.720
<v Speaker 5>There's another mark against me. While the marks kept adding

0:18:18.800 --> 0:18:22.160
<v Speaker 5>up and it doesn't look good. Column here on. I'm

0:18:22.200 --> 0:18:28.520
<v Speaker 5>getting very nervous as lack of preparation, i would say,

0:18:29.720 --> 0:18:33.640
<v Speaker 5>was coming to light, and it was not looking good

0:18:33.680 --> 0:18:34.360
<v Speaker 5>for the home.

0:18:34.160 --> 0:18:37.440
<v Speaker 2>Team, Okay for the audience with their own score seats

0:18:37.480 --> 0:18:40.560
<v Speaker 2>at home. The evidence presented against mister Poole was limited

0:18:40.600 --> 0:18:44.800
<v Speaker 2>to this, the doctored up composite sketch, his ex girlfriend's

0:18:44.800 --> 0:18:48.080
<v Speaker 2>false testimony that he admitted to the crime, and the

0:18:48.160 --> 0:18:53.119
<v Speaker 2>junk science the bitemark evidence. A Michigan State Police scientists

0:18:53.119 --> 0:18:55.760
<v Speaker 2>also conducted blood type testing at the crime scene and

0:18:55.840 --> 0:18:59.159
<v Speaker 2>did not find any type AB blood that would have

0:18:59.200 --> 0:19:03.560
<v Speaker 2>matched to mister Pool. Due to illness, this scientist did

0:19:03.600 --> 0:19:08.920
<v Speaker 2>not testify, and instead of delaying the trial to get

0:19:08.920 --> 0:19:12.240
<v Speaker 2>this crucial testimony in front of the jury, mister Poole's

0:19:12.280 --> 0:19:16.560
<v Speaker 2>lawyers just entered the paper report into evidence, which isn't

0:19:16.720 --> 0:19:19.919
<v Speaker 2>close to us convincing. So yeah, it was definitely not

0:19:20.000 --> 0:19:22.800
<v Speaker 2>looking good for the home team. So at this point,

0:19:22.840 --> 0:19:25.199
<v Speaker 2>mister Poole, you decided to testify on your own behalf.

0:19:25.960 --> 0:19:28.000
<v Speaker 2>Take us through that experience and how you were feeling

0:19:29.160 --> 0:19:29.840
<v Speaker 2>at this time.

0:19:30.480 --> 0:19:35.639
<v Speaker 5>I'm sunk, I am absolutely beside myself. I'm in a

0:19:35.680 --> 0:19:40.199
<v Speaker 5>panic state. When the prosecutor ended his his presentation. The

0:19:40.320 --> 0:19:43.879
<v Speaker 5>judge asked my attorney to put on his witnesses. My

0:19:43.960 --> 0:19:47.880
<v Speaker 5>attorney says, yeah, no, we're good defense. Rest He put

0:19:47.920 --> 0:19:51.400
<v Speaker 5>on no witnesses at all, whatsoever. I said, wait, wait

0:19:51.400 --> 0:19:53.440
<v Speaker 5>a minute, wait a minute, you're not going to put

0:19:53.480 --> 0:19:57.159
<v Speaker 5>on any witnesses at all. Somebody's got to go up

0:19:57.160 --> 0:19:59.760
<v Speaker 5>with my defense. I'll testify. He said, well, I went

0:19:59.840 --> 0:20:03.120
<v Speaker 5>to you're getting on the stand. The prosecutor is really

0:20:03.160 --> 0:20:06.560
<v Speaker 5>gonna I don't care. Somebody's got to stand up for me.

0:20:07.080 --> 0:20:10.120
<v Speaker 5>So I demanded to be put on the stand, and

0:20:10.320 --> 0:20:10.920
<v Speaker 5>I got up.

0:20:11.000 --> 0:20:14.680
<v Speaker 3>So let me interrupt you here for a second. Your

0:20:15.200 --> 0:20:18.679
<v Speaker 3>attorney had not talked to you about whether or not

0:20:18.760 --> 0:20:21.840
<v Speaker 3>you're going to testify until that moment. You had no

0:20:21.880 --> 0:20:26.960
<v Speaker 3>conversation about that. No, he didn't prep you for any

0:20:27.040 --> 0:20:30.920
<v Speaker 3>of this testimony. No, so you had no idea what

0:20:30.960 --> 0:20:35.160
<v Speaker 3>you might say or might not say. No, and he

0:20:35.320 --> 0:20:39.320
<v Speaker 3>just advised you not to do it, and that was it, right.

0:20:40.280 --> 0:20:43.080
<v Speaker 5>But I said, no, no, no, no, I'm getting on the stand.

0:20:43.119 --> 0:20:46.120
<v Speaker 5>Somebody's got to say I didn't do it. Somebody's got

0:20:46.160 --> 0:20:49.679
<v Speaker 5>to see me, my reaction or whatever I mean, however

0:20:49.720 --> 0:20:53.600
<v Speaker 5>it plays out, I can't be convicted and just sit

0:20:53.680 --> 0:20:57.479
<v Speaker 5>here and not say anything. If I'm going to go down,

0:20:57.560 --> 0:20:59.800
<v Speaker 5>I'm want to go down kicking and screaming. So I

0:20:59.800 --> 0:21:03.240
<v Speaker 5>did my best. I got on the stand and against

0:21:03.280 --> 0:21:10.200
<v Speaker 5>the prosecutors manipulations of wording or his learned techniques of

0:21:11.440 --> 0:21:18.760
<v Speaker 5>interviewing somebody, I did my best. But I guess it

0:21:18.800 --> 0:21:20.280
<v Speaker 5>didn't translate to the jury.

0:21:20.600 --> 0:21:22.840
<v Speaker 3>It's very you know, I mean that anybody can be

0:21:22.920 --> 0:21:27.240
<v Speaker 3>made to sound like a liar under those heightened circumstances.

0:21:27.480 --> 0:21:31.959
<v Speaker 3>And so tell us about was your family at the

0:21:31.960 --> 0:21:34.719
<v Speaker 3>there for the verdict and your testimony?

0:21:35.200 --> 0:21:41.160
<v Speaker 5>You know, due to my attorney's initial response or initial investigation,

0:21:41.920 --> 0:21:45.040
<v Speaker 5>it was just a matter of routine. This is not you.

0:21:45.400 --> 0:21:48.639
<v Speaker 5>The evidence says that's not you. Don't worry about it.

0:21:48.680 --> 0:21:52.840
<v Speaker 5>You'll never be convicted. No, my family's in North Carolina.

0:21:52.920 --> 0:21:55.160
<v Speaker 5>I wasn't going to have them fly up to Michigan.

0:21:55.880 --> 0:21:58.720
<v Speaker 5>So I had no family or friends or anybody. I

0:21:58.720 --> 0:22:00.480
<v Speaker 5>had no support there in the courtroom at all.

0:22:00.600 --> 0:22:00.879
<v Speaker 1>Wow.

0:22:01.080 --> 0:22:04.720
<v Speaker 3>And so you walked into this believing that you know,

0:22:04.920 --> 0:22:07.560
<v Speaker 3>a day or two later you'd be acquitted, go back

0:22:07.600 --> 0:22:08.240
<v Speaker 3>to your life.

0:22:08.400 --> 0:22:12.080
<v Speaker 5>Exactly. I could see that this was orchestrated for a

0:22:12.080 --> 0:22:16.840
<v Speaker 5>conviction of an unsolved murder of a very important person,

0:22:17.640 --> 0:22:21.200
<v Speaker 5>well loved by the community. We're satisfying a community need

0:22:21.240 --> 0:22:27.480
<v Speaker 5>for a conviction. And I was just a young twenty

0:22:27.480 --> 0:22:31.119
<v Speaker 5>two year old kid, so you know I was served up.

0:22:31.359 --> 0:22:35.439
<v Speaker 3>Wow, I mean you were just you know, in a

0:22:35.480 --> 0:22:38.639
<v Speaker 3>life raft on your own, cut from the shore. It

0:22:38.720 --> 0:22:43.000
<v Speaker 3>sounded like, with no support, no family support, no lawyally support,

0:22:43.680 --> 0:22:50.200
<v Speaker 3>no scientific support, you get convicted and sentenced to life

0:22:50.240 --> 0:22:51.520
<v Speaker 3>without parole. Is that right?

0:22:52.520 --> 0:22:52.960
<v Speaker 5>Correct?

0:22:53.240 --> 0:22:55.919
<v Speaker 3>Tell us the role that Hank Clayton played in this trial.

0:22:56.800 --> 0:23:02.920
<v Speaker 4>Hank Clayton was in this storyline as an individual who

0:23:03.119 --> 0:23:06.720
<v Speaker 4>had spent a considerable amount of time with the victim

0:23:07.440 --> 0:23:12.080
<v Speaker 4>leading up to the time of his disappearance, and it

0:23:12.119 --> 0:23:16.320
<v Speaker 4>was basically uncontroverted that on the night of the murder,

0:23:16.400 --> 0:23:20.919
<v Speaker 4>leading up to the murder, that Miha had left the

0:23:20.960 --> 0:23:25.000
<v Speaker 4>bar at least once with mister Clayton and returned with him,

0:23:25.520 --> 0:23:29.959
<v Speaker 4>And in fact, there were witness statements and testimony at

0:23:29.960 --> 0:23:33.840
<v Speaker 4>the prelim that suggested that he in fact left the

0:23:33.920 --> 0:23:39.880
<v Speaker 4>bar with Hank Clayton. The police did question mister Clayton,

0:23:40.080 --> 0:23:44.040
<v Speaker 4>and they did search his truck they did find a knife,

0:23:44.119 --> 0:23:48.520
<v Speaker 4>They didn't find anything unusual in the back of his truck,

0:23:49.119 --> 0:23:52.679
<v Speaker 4>and they pretty much dropped him as a suspect.

0:23:53.119 --> 0:23:55.959
<v Speaker 3>And the victim was stabbed right, so there was no

0:23:56.000 --> 0:23:57.160
<v Speaker 3>testing of this knife.

0:23:57.640 --> 0:24:01.240
<v Speaker 4>There was testing, and they did not find any blood.

0:24:01.440 --> 0:24:05.760
<v Speaker 4>We had an investigator look into his background and he

0:24:06.000 --> 0:24:11.120
<v Speaker 4>was known to threaten people with knives and behave in

0:24:11.160 --> 0:24:13.359
<v Speaker 4>a jealous manner, if you want to call it that.

0:24:13.600 --> 0:24:18.680
<v Speaker 4>We also spent many, many years trying to determine what

0:24:18.720 --> 0:24:23.280
<v Speaker 4>mister Clayton's blood type was. We were unsuccessful in trying

0:24:23.280 --> 0:24:26.840
<v Speaker 4>to determine that, and we had to remind ourselves that

0:24:27.119 --> 0:24:30.880
<v Speaker 4>we might not be able to solve the crime, and

0:24:30.960 --> 0:24:35.600
<v Speaker 4>we had to step back and think through how are

0:24:35.640 --> 0:24:37.639
<v Speaker 4>we going to exonerate mister Poole.

0:24:38.280 --> 0:24:41.520
<v Speaker 3>So, mister Pool, after your sentenced, tell us about your

0:24:41.520 --> 0:24:46.040
<v Speaker 3>life in prison before Marla took on your case. What

0:24:46.160 --> 0:24:48.600
<v Speaker 3>was your appeals like? What was your prison life like?

0:24:49.240 --> 0:24:53.159
<v Speaker 5>I started trying to educate myself as to how I

0:24:53.200 --> 0:24:57.480
<v Speaker 5>got in there, the law, the statutes, what was required

0:24:57.520 --> 0:25:00.960
<v Speaker 5>for a conviction, how do I appeal? Just started ordering

0:25:01.000 --> 0:25:05.000
<v Speaker 5>books and reading case law. I formulated a list of

0:25:05.480 --> 0:25:08.200
<v Speaker 5>I guess I could say demands. I was going to

0:25:08.240 --> 0:25:11.320
<v Speaker 5>make sure I was in control of this of this

0:25:11.440 --> 0:25:14.640
<v Speaker 5>journey here, because leaving it up to my attorney, even

0:25:14.680 --> 0:25:17.320
<v Speaker 5>though when I had paid, did turn out well. The

0:25:17.400 --> 0:25:21.760
<v Speaker 5>court appointed lawyer, I got him on the phone maybe

0:25:22.480 --> 0:25:27.240
<v Speaker 5>twice throughout the whole Pillot process. I never once seen him.

0:25:27.359 --> 0:25:28.880
<v Speaker 5>Don't know what it looks like to this day.

0:25:29.560 --> 0:25:32.520
<v Speaker 3>Oh my god. And the lawyering you got, mister Poole,

0:25:32.680 --> 0:25:35.000
<v Speaker 3>it just outrages me. I see a lot of bad

0:25:35.080 --> 0:25:38.000
<v Speaker 3>lawyering in this job. But you know, here, you know,

0:25:38.119 --> 0:25:41.399
<v Speaker 3>you have such stark evidence of innocence before you even

0:25:42.040 --> 0:25:46.800
<v Speaker 3>get indicted, and just go through a trial where they,

0:25:47.320 --> 0:25:50.480
<v Speaker 3>you know, aren't being straightforward with the blood evidence, and

0:25:50.520 --> 0:25:53.919
<v Speaker 3>they're using all this junk science and they're inventing sketches,

0:25:54.000 --> 0:25:55.560
<v Speaker 3>you know. I mean, it's hard to believe that we're

0:25:55.560 --> 0:25:57.280
<v Speaker 3>talking about the United States.

0:25:57.560 --> 0:26:02.159
<v Speaker 5>I was absolutely myself. I said, I'm not going to

0:26:02.240 --> 0:26:04.800
<v Speaker 5>lose the appeal too. So I had to start out

0:26:04.840 --> 0:26:07.080
<v Speaker 5>from basics. So in too much time, I got my

0:26:07.200 --> 0:26:10.880
<v Speaker 5>GD I went to an office occupation class to learn

0:26:10.920 --> 0:26:13.840
<v Speaker 5>how to type, so I could type my briefs. And

0:26:13.880 --> 0:26:16.440
<v Speaker 5>then so I got me a typewriter, and I started

0:26:16.440 --> 0:26:20.119
<v Speaker 5>writing myself, formulating my own supplemental briefs to put in

0:26:20.400 --> 0:26:23.920
<v Speaker 5>on behalf of myself, and I put everything but the

0:26:24.000 --> 0:26:27.480
<v Speaker 5>kitchen sink in there. Actually took my case all the

0:26:27.520 --> 0:26:30.240
<v Speaker 5>way up to the United States Supreme Court, and every

0:26:30.320 --> 0:26:33.400
<v Speaker 5>court got it wrong. Yeah. I can only attribute that

0:26:33.440 --> 0:26:37.479
<v Speaker 5>to just not giving me the time of day because

0:26:37.520 --> 0:26:40.120
<v Speaker 5>I was a prisoner. I mean, listen, I've been studying

0:26:40.160 --> 0:26:41.800
<v Speaker 5>law for twenty five years.

0:26:42.200 --> 0:26:42.480
<v Speaker 3>Yep.

0:26:43.000 --> 0:26:45.360
<v Speaker 5>How could I not know what I'm talking about by

0:26:45.400 --> 0:26:45.760
<v Speaker 5>this time.

0:26:45.880 --> 0:26:47.959
<v Speaker 3>I have no doubt that you're a pell of briefs

0:26:48.040 --> 0:26:50.879
<v Speaker 3>or stronger than ninety percent of the briefs that are

0:26:50.880 --> 0:26:55.240
<v Speaker 3>filed in these cases. I want to get to your

0:26:55.280 --> 0:26:58.560
<v Speaker 3>decision to reach out to Marl's clinic, and how you

0:26:58.640 --> 0:27:02.119
<v Speaker 3>came when you began to learn about the power of

0:27:02.200 --> 0:27:05.119
<v Speaker 3>DNA evidence, and how you decided to reach out to

0:27:05.160 --> 0:27:07.440
<v Speaker 3>the instance prior to that, Marla runs.

0:27:07.240 --> 0:27:09.480
<v Speaker 5>The whole time. I reached out to attorneys trying to

0:27:09.480 --> 0:27:13.479
<v Speaker 5>get assistance because I needed a signature behind my briefs,

0:27:13.520 --> 0:27:16.280
<v Speaker 5>behind my research. I need somebody to side on and

0:27:16.320 --> 0:27:19.120
<v Speaker 5>say yes, this is legit. I needed somebody. I needed

0:27:19.119 --> 0:27:23.919
<v Speaker 5>a voice to stand behind me. Eventually the stars aligned,

0:27:24.320 --> 0:27:27.959
<v Speaker 5>Marla came to my aid, and Marla has been working

0:27:28.119 --> 0:27:30.720
<v Speaker 5>diligently on my case ever since.

0:27:31.240 --> 0:27:36.199
<v Speaker 4>We actually were looking pretty closely at Gil's case after

0:27:36.280 --> 0:27:40.439
<v Speaker 4>he wrote us, because we could tell based on just

0:27:40.520 --> 0:27:45.159
<v Speaker 4>his questionnaire that if half of this was true, he

0:27:45.280 --> 0:27:46.320
<v Speaker 4>was wrongfully convicted.

0:28:07.359 --> 0:28:09.879
<v Speaker 2>Marla and her law students submitted hundreds of freedom of

0:28:09.880 --> 0:28:13.040
<v Speaker 2>information requests to reinvestigate the case and do their own

0:28:13.080 --> 0:28:17.520
<v Speaker 2>forensic DNA testing on the evidence that remained. Unfortunately, because

0:28:17.560 --> 0:28:20.720
<v Speaker 2>mister Poole had, as he said, put everything but the

0:28:20.800 --> 0:28:24.080
<v Speaker 2>kitchen sink into trying to get himself out on his own,

0:28:24.320 --> 0:28:26.959
<v Speaker 2>Marla and her students weren't allowed to submit everything they

0:28:27.080 --> 0:28:31.200
<v Speaker 2>found to the appellate courts because it wasn't technically new evidence.

0:28:31.880 --> 0:28:34.400
<v Speaker 2>But the turning point in this case finally comes when

0:28:34.440 --> 0:28:38.800
<v Speaker 2>Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel launches the first statewide conviction

0:28:38.880 --> 0:28:42.320
<v Speaker 2>Integrity Unit in twenty nineteen. And Marla, this is the

0:28:42.320 --> 0:28:45.040
<v Speaker 2>same year you filed an application for mister Poole's case.

0:28:45.960 --> 0:28:49.120
<v Speaker 4>When we did his application, we went in full guns.

0:28:49.240 --> 0:28:53.760
<v Speaker 4>We had the expert's opinion on the DNA, We had

0:28:53.760 --> 0:28:58.720
<v Speaker 4>the expert's opinion on the identification, and then we had

0:28:58.920 --> 0:29:03.920
<v Speaker 4>the full history of the role that Alan Warnick played

0:29:03.920 --> 0:29:08.160
<v Speaker 4>in the case, along with his association with other wrongful

0:29:08.160 --> 0:29:12.360
<v Speaker 4>convictions in the state of Michigan. We didn't argue that

0:29:12.480 --> 0:29:15.240
<v Speaker 4>the bipe mark evidence was new. We just argue that

0:29:15.320 --> 0:29:18.560
<v Speaker 4>once you find this other stuff to be new, you're

0:29:18.600 --> 0:29:20.479
<v Speaker 4>going to take a look at the whole case, and

0:29:20.520 --> 0:29:22.240
<v Speaker 4>you're going to want to take a really close look

0:29:22.280 --> 0:29:23.120
<v Speaker 4>at this bipe mark.

0:29:23.440 --> 0:29:27.200
<v Speaker 5>When they formulated the Conviction Integrity Unit, my case was

0:29:27.720 --> 0:29:30.920
<v Speaker 5>one of them. They started initially considering they're going to

0:29:30.960 --> 0:29:33.400
<v Speaker 5>make sure they got it right. And the detectives actually

0:29:33.440 --> 0:29:36.160
<v Speaker 5>told me, we're either going to be your best friend

0:29:36.280 --> 0:29:39.320
<v Speaker 5>or your worst enemy, because we're not pulling any punches here.

0:29:39.320 --> 0:29:41.080
<v Speaker 5>We're going to put it all out on the table.

0:29:41.400 --> 0:29:43.560
<v Speaker 5>So I knew in my heart I was getting out,

0:29:43.720 --> 0:29:45.760
<v Speaker 5>and I started bragging, Hey, I'm gonna get out of here.

0:29:45.800 --> 0:29:47.840
<v Speaker 5>I'm telling people around me, I'm getting out of here,

0:29:48.160 --> 0:29:53.120
<v Speaker 5>and regularly I'm getting updates from Marlow. I got notified

0:29:53.160 --> 0:29:55.200
<v Speaker 5>that I had a Zoom meeting the next day.

0:29:55.600 --> 0:29:59.440
<v Speaker 4>I remember very specifically. We were in the midst of

0:29:59.520 --> 0:30:02.920
<v Speaker 4>COVID ill so we couldn't tell you in person.

0:30:03.560 --> 0:30:06.120
<v Speaker 5>She says, it's going before the judge next week, and

0:30:06.160 --> 0:30:10.760
<v Speaker 5>there's nobody opposing you. Everybody is in agreement that you're innocent.

0:30:11.040 --> 0:30:13.680
<v Speaker 4>And I am pretty sure I was crying before I

0:30:13.720 --> 0:30:16.280
<v Speaker 4>probably got the words out. But it was one of

0:30:16.320 --> 0:30:21.920
<v Speaker 4>the happiest days for me to say, your case, after

0:30:22.400 --> 0:30:26.040
<v Speaker 4>working on it for almost twenty years, is finally turning

0:30:26.080 --> 0:30:26.680
<v Speaker 4>the corner.

0:30:27.160 --> 0:30:30.800
<v Speaker 5>I was shaken up. I mean, I think I can

0:30:30.880 --> 0:30:34.680
<v Speaker 5>remember crying twice in my conviction. Once when the judge

0:30:34.680 --> 0:30:36.440
<v Speaker 5>sentenced me and I had to make that phone call

0:30:36.480 --> 0:30:39.440
<v Speaker 5>to my mother, and the other time was when Marla

0:30:39.480 --> 0:30:43.400
<v Speaker 5>told me that that next day I had to hear

0:30:43.520 --> 0:30:50.920
<v Speaker 5>And within hours, Marla and her team of attorneys were

0:30:50.960 --> 0:30:53.080
<v Speaker 5>at the prison walking me out the door. I didn't

0:30:53.080 --> 0:30:55.440
<v Speaker 5>even have a pair of shoes to put on. They

0:30:55.480 --> 0:30:59.719
<v Speaker 5>brought me pants and shoes from the church, and I

0:30:59.840 --> 0:31:04.280
<v Speaker 5>was met there by easily one hundred people. Everybody from

0:31:04.320 --> 0:31:07.680
<v Speaker 5>the Attorney General's office was there. There were tears and

0:31:07.720 --> 0:31:11.920
<v Speaker 5>apologies all around, and I guess that's when I was

0:31:12.000 --> 0:31:16.400
<v Speaker 5>kind of reborn. I was able to start a new life,

0:31:16.560 --> 0:31:20.040
<v Speaker 5>which was not easy. I'm not going to complain about it,

0:31:20.080 --> 0:31:22.280
<v Speaker 5>but I'm going to tell you it was not easy,

0:31:22.320 --> 0:31:25.360
<v Speaker 5>and it's still difficult at times. I've been out for

0:31:25.400 --> 0:31:28.360
<v Speaker 5>a year now and I'm just now getting the hang

0:31:28.480 --> 0:31:30.840
<v Speaker 5>of some of this technology. They didn't even have cell

0:31:30.840 --> 0:31:33.320
<v Speaker 5>phones when I went to prison, so and there's been

0:31:33.360 --> 0:31:35.720
<v Speaker 5>a lot, a big learning curve of how to act

0:31:35.760 --> 0:31:39.280
<v Speaker 5>in society because this is a whole new world. It's

0:31:39.320 --> 0:31:44.040
<v Speaker 5>not the end because there's so many cases, so many

0:31:44.120 --> 0:31:48.600
<v Speaker 5>cases that still have to be reviewed and vetted, and

0:31:49.600 --> 0:31:54.080
<v Speaker 5>that I wasn't only one. So there's people all left behind,

0:31:54.160 --> 0:31:57.400
<v Speaker 5>and I feel like obligated to kind of pay it

0:31:57.440 --> 0:32:00.280
<v Speaker 5>forward here and help some others here. So there's a

0:32:00.320 --> 0:32:03.680
<v Speaker 5>lot of people that are caught up in a procedural

0:32:03.720 --> 0:32:09.120
<v Speaker 5>morass that they can't dig out of, especially some people

0:32:09.160 --> 0:32:13.280
<v Speaker 5>that are in there that have less than a full education,

0:32:14.080 --> 0:32:17.280
<v Speaker 5>or don't have the skills to navigate these waters, or

0:32:17.360 --> 0:32:19.920
<v Speaker 5>don't have the support. I didn't have any support, but

0:32:20.000 --> 0:32:23.640
<v Speaker 5>I fought a long time tooth and nail to get support.

0:32:23.880 --> 0:32:27.040
<v Speaker 5>That's just a testament to my tenacity. Some people just

0:32:27.040 --> 0:32:29.840
<v Speaker 5>don't have that. There's no reason for somebody to be

0:32:29.920 --> 0:32:32.959
<v Speaker 5>condemned to prison because they don't have the fight in them.

0:32:33.360 --> 0:32:35.360
<v Speaker 2>So I hear your call to action is for people

0:32:35.440 --> 0:32:38.960
<v Speaker 2>to support the Cooler Innocence Project or righteous Endeavor, no doubt.

0:32:39.200 --> 0:32:41.800
<v Speaker 2>But Marla, what can listeners do to help people like

0:32:41.840 --> 0:32:43.160
<v Speaker 2>mister Poole and your work.

0:32:43.520 --> 0:32:48.280
<v Speaker 4>Well, certainly we would welcome your financial support, but also

0:32:49.000 --> 0:32:51.520
<v Speaker 4>I would just say that there's a number of really

0:32:51.600 --> 0:32:55.040
<v Speaker 4>promising policy issues going on in the state right now.

0:32:55.200 --> 0:33:00.360
<v Speaker 4>We're working on amendments to our Wrongful Imprisonment Compensation Act.

0:33:00.720 --> 0:33:06.000
<v Speaker 4>We want to make sure that our clients are adequately compensated.

0:33:06.240 --> 0:33:09.280
<v Speaker 4>If you care about criminal justice issues, it's a great

0:33:09.360 --> 0:33:13.560
<v Speaker 4>time to just touch base with your legislator and say

0:33:13.600 --> 0:33:18.760
<v Speaker 4>that you'd like to support improvements to the criminal justice system.

0:33:19.400 --> 0:33:22.360
<v Speaker 4>And you know, I'm always available to answer questions about

0:33:22.360 --> 0:33:25.280
<v Speaker 4>our office or about the policy work that's going on

0:33:25.360 --> 0:33:26.360
<v Speaker 4>in Michigan.

0:33:26.360 --> 0:33:29.000
<v Speaker 3>Right Let's put the justice in the criminal justice system.

0:33:29.240 --> 0:33:32.680
<v Speaker 3>I hear that. Thank you both so much for taking

0:33:32.720 --> 0:33:37.160
<v Speaker 3>the time to share your incredible story with the listeners

0:33:37.200 --> 0:33:41.320
<v Speaker 3>of Wrongful Conviction Podcast. We're at the point of the

0:33:41.360 --> 0:33:44.480
<v Speaker 3>show called closing Arguments. Do a round robin as to

0:33:45.040 --> 0:33:47.520
<v Speaker 3>any final thoughts that you want to share with our

0:33:47.560 --> 0:33:51.520
<v Speaker 3>audience and We'll begin with you, Marla.

0:33:52.240 --> 0:33:55.520
<v Speaker 4>I would just say that when you look back at

0:33:55.560 --> 0:34:01.720
<v Speaker 4>mister Poole's case, all of the heartbreakings and mistakes could

0:34:01.760 --> 0:34:06.239
<v Speaker 4>have been avoided and corrected. You know that actually kind

0:34:06.280 --> 0:34:09.440
<v Speaker 4>of makes me get up every day and do the work.

0:34:10.120 --> 0:34:13.680
<v Speaker 4>But I guess you know. My final thought to those

0:34:13.719 --> 0:34:16.440
<v Speaker 4>who are listening is just you know, a wrongful conviction

0:34:16.640 --> 0:34:21.080
<v Speaker 4>can happen to anyone, and we all love someone, so

0:34:21.160 --> 0:34:23.920
<v Speaker 4>that means it could happen to someone that we love.

0:34:24.239 --> 0:34:28.040
<v Speaker 4>Everyone's entitled to an effective attorney at trial and on appeal.

0:34:28.200 --> 0:34:33.000
<v Speaker 4>Everyone is entitled to a fair proceeding where things are

0:34:33.000 --> 0:34:36.279
<v Speaker 4>not made up in their criminal trial. We have to

0:34:36.400 --> 0:34:40.080
<v Speaker 4>start looking at innocents cases differently. We can't treat them

0:34:40.160 --> 0:34:46.919
<v Speaker 4>like typical appellate cases for sure, because years this When

0:34:46.920 --> 0:34:49.520
<v Speaker 4>we look back, right, we see Gill's case and we're like,

0:34:49.640 --> 0:34:52.959
<v Speaker 4>how did this take thirty two years? But yet Gill

0:34:53.120 --> 0:34:58.200
<v Speaker 4>knows and Chris knows, and I know that even after

0:34:58.239 --> 0:35:00.120
<v Speaker 4>thirty two years, it was a mirror.

0:35:00.080 --> 0:35:02.960
<v Speaker 3>Called mister Poole, what's your closing argument?

0:35:03.680 --> 0:35:08.200
<v Speaker 5>If you ask anybody what's the best criminal justice system

0:35:08.200 --> 0:35:10.600
<v Speaker 5>in the world. I don't think anybody's going to come

0:35:10.680 --> 0:35:14.040
<v Speaker 5>up with anything better than what the United States has.

0:35:15.080 --> 0:35:17.440
<v Speaker 5>But when you have human actors, and when you have

0:35:17.600 --> 0:35:23.879
<v Speaker 5>human interaction, personalities getting away, bad choices get in the way,

0:35:24.920 --> 0:35:28.680
<v Speaker 5>and bad actors get in the way. A lot of

0:35:28.680 --> 0:35:33.759
<v Speaker 5>that comes from no penalties for the bad actors. I

0:35:33.800 --> 0:35:38.040
<v Speaker 5>think the takeaway is here, take a real deep look

0:35:38.840 --> 0:35:47.960
<v Speaker 5>at the things that are presented from different perspectives. If

0:35:47.960 --> 0:35:50.600
<v Speaker 5>you look at things from a perspective that this was

0:35:50.640 --> 0:35:54.920
<v Speaker 5>all fabricated, it all makes sense. It was not because

0:35:54.960 --> 0:35:57.280
<v Speaker 5>I was guilty, It was because they had the ability

0:35:57.360 --> 0:36:02.120
<v Speaker 5>to do it without any penalty. So I think that

0:36:02.239 --> 0:36:03.280
<v Speaker 5>needs to be corrected.

0:36:06.480 --> 0:36:09.719
<v Speaker 2>Thank you for listening to Wrongful Conviction. I'd like to

0:36:09.719 --> 0:36:13.839
<v Speaker 2>thank our executive producers The Deadly Doctor, Jason Flamm and

0:36:14.000 --> 0:36:17.920
<v Speaker 2>Kevin Wardis. The senior producer for this episode is Jackie Pauley,

0:36:18.040 --> 0:36:21.600
<v Speaker 2>and our producers are Leila Robinson and Jeff Claiborne. Our

0:36:21.760 --> 0:36:25.680
<v Speaker 2>editor is Roxindra Gweedy. The music in this production is

0:36:25.719 --> 0:36:29.680
<v Speaker 2>by three time OSCAR nominated composer Jay Ralph. Be sure

0:36:29.719 --> 0:36:33.320
<v Speaker 2>to follow us on Instagram at Wrongful Conviction, on Facebook

0:36:33.360 --> 0:36:37.160
<v Speaker 2>at Wrongful Conviction Podcast, and on Twitter. At wrong Conviction

0:36:37.560 --> 0:36:40.759
<v Speaker 2>as well as at Lava for Good on all three platforms.

0:36:41.520 --> 0:36:44.600
<v Speaker 2>You can also follow me on Twitter at Chris Underscore

0:36:44.640 --> 0:36:50.640
<v Speaker 2>Fabricant and on Instagram at Chris Underscore Fabricant. Wrongful Conviction

0:36:50.960 --> 0:36:54.000
<v Speaker 2>is the production of Lava for Good Podcasts and association

0:36:54.160 --> 0:37:04.839
<v Speaker 2>with Signal Company Number One.

0:37:07.400 --> 0:37:10.120
<v Speaker 1>If you were riveted by the staircase, as I know

0:37:10.320 --> 0:37:13.040
<v Speaker 1>I was, you're gonna want to tune in next week

0:37:13.040 --> 0:37:17.000
<v Speaker 1>for the guest hosted episode of Wrongful Conviction Because get this,

0:37:17.760 --> 0:37:21.000
<v Speaker 1>the two incredible lawyers from the show, David Rudolph and

0:37:21.040 --> 0:37:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Sonya Pfeiffer, are going to talk to David's former client,

0:37:24.760 --> 0:37:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Michael Peterson, and you know that name about one of

0:37:27.120 --> 0:37:30.560
<v Speaker 1>the most famous and infamous wronful conviction stories in the

0:37:30.600 --> 0:37:34.000
<v Speaker 1>history of America. You know about the case, but now

0:37:34.040 --> 0:37:38.800
<v Speaker 1>you're going to hear the real story behind it. Tune

0:37:38.840 --> 0:37:42.800
<v Speaker 1>in listen next Monday in the Wrongful Conviction podcast feed.