WEBVTT - The Real Killer Season 3: Ep. 15, The Docket

0:00:03.040 --> 0:00:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Two days before our last episode came out, Kelly pointed

0:00:07.720 --> 0:00:10.360
<v Speaker 1>out there was a different case number on her littering

0:00:10.400 --> 0:00:14.240
<v Speaker 1>case court docket, and the sentence of forty eight hours

0:00:14.240 --> 0:00:18.400
<v Speaker 1>shock jail time and two years probation, which you heard

0:00:18.440 --> 0:00:24.160
<v Speaker 1>her say never happened, was in fact also incorrect. What

0:00:24.480 --> 0:00:26.960
<v Speaker 1>will Byron's legal team have to say about this?

0:00:28.000 --> 0:00:29.920
<v Speaker 2>What are your concerns? I mean I could just hear

0:00:29.960 --> 0:00:32.680
<v Speaker 2>it in your voice. Yeah, I mean I'm upset. I've

0:00:32.720 --> 0:00:33.400
<v Speaker 2>been up all night.

0:00:34.080 --> 0:00:38.479
<v Speaker 1>Is this alleged clerical error easily explained? Will it change

0:00:38.560 --> 0:00:42.200
<v Speaker 1>how Kelly's credibility is now viewed? And what a fact,

0:00:42.240 --> 0:00:57.840
<v Speaker 1>if any, will this have on Byron's legal case. I'm

0:00:57.920 --> 0:01:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Leah Rothman. This is The Real Killer, Episode fifteen the docket.

0:01:12.520 --> 0:01:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Right after Kelly and I speak that Tuesday night about

0:01:15.600 --> 0:01:19.720
<v Speaker 1>this error on her court docket, I message Byron's attorney,

0:01:19.760 --> 0:01:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Brian Russell to see if he can get the rest

0:01:22.319 --> 0:01:25.160
<v Speaker 1>of the team together to talk the next morning. I

0:01:25.200 --> 0:01:28.800
<v Speaker 1>don't share with Brian exactly why I'm asking for this

0:01:28.880 --> 0:01:32.480
<v Speaker 1>last minute interview, but he comes back and says yes,

0:01:32.880 --> 0:01:36.760
<v Speaker 1>he and the team will be available. So the next

0:01:36.760 --> 0:01:42.160
<v Speaker 1>morning at eleven am my time, Brian, Nicole Gordon, Sean O'Brien,

0:01:42.480 --> 0:01:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Quin O'Brien, and I all log into Zoom for what

0:01:46.560 --> 0:01:51.320
<v Speaker 1>will be a very interesting conversation about Kelly's court docket

0:01:51.840 --> 0:01:55.160
<v Speaker 1>and what can and cannot be proven?

0:01:56.920 --> 0:01:57.800
<v Speaker 2>Can everyone hear me?

0:01:58.520 --> 0:01:58.880
<v Speaker 3>Yes?

0:01:59.400 --> 0:02:00.320
<v Speaker 4>Yeah yet.

0:02:00.800 --> 0:02:05.080
<v Speaker 1>So thank you for getting together this quickly, because I

0:02:05.120 --> 0:02:08.680
<v Speaker 1>reached out to Brian last night late last night asking

0:02:09.200 --> 0:02:12.600
<v Speaker 1>for us to all get together. Kelly texted me yesterday

0:02:13.120 --> 0:02:18.640
<v Speaker 1>and sent me screen grabs from her littering charge and

0:02:18.680 --> 0:02:22.280
<v Speaker 1>I was like, okay, great, and she was like, see,

0:02:22.400 --> 0:02:23.480
<v Speaker 1>it's just a fine.

0:02:24.160 --> 0:02:27.680
<v Speaker 2>I just had to pay a fine. And I was like, well,

0:02:27.880 --> 0:02:29.000
<v Speaker 2>let me send you what I have.

0:02:29.720 --> 0:02:32.520
<v Speaker 1>It says you did forty eight hours of shock, jail

0:02:32.600 --> 0:02:38.080
<v Speaker 1>time and two years probation. Within minutes, she wrote me

0:02:38.200 --> 0:02:43.560
<v Speaker 1>back angrily pointed out that there is another case number

0:02:44.120 --> 0:02:48.600
<v Speaker 1>next to that sentence on the docket, and at first

0:02:48.639 --> 0:02:50.240
<v Speaker 1>I didn't see it. She was like, that's not my

0:02:50.360 --> 0:02:52.800
<v Speaker 1>case number, and I was like, I don't see what

0:02:52.840 --> 0:02:56.320
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing and she's basically like, you dummy, it's right there.

0:02:57.360 --> 0:03:00.440
<v Speaker 1>And so I looked up that case number and it's

0:03:00.440 --> 0:03:02.840
<v Speaker 1>a guy named Brendan.

0:03:03.480 --> 0:03:07.000
<v Speaker 2>I won't use his last name who in nineteen.

0:03:06.720 --> 0:03:11.239
<v Speaker 1>Ninety nine got in trouble for allegedly passing some bad checks.

0:03:11.720 --> 0:03:14.880
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't say anything about shock jail time, but under

0:03:15.040 --> 0:03:18.800
<v Speaker 1>his sentence or program info, it says that he had

0:03:18.919 --> 0:03:23.040
<v Speaker 1>unsupervised probation for seven hundred and thirty one days, So

0:03:23.160 --> 0:03:24.240
<v Speaker 1>that's two years.

0:03:23.960 --> 0:03:24.440
<v Speaker 4>In a day.

0:03:25.440 --> 0:03:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Kelly, as you heard in the last episode, said I

0:03:28.080 --> 0:03:31.600
<v Speaker 1>didn't go to jail. I didn't I wasn't on probation.

0:03:32.320 --> 0:03:35.000
<v Speaker 1>So how do you explain this?

0:03:35.800 --> 0:03:39.280
<v Speaker 4>Kelly's word is mud. Frankly, I don't care what Kelly

0:03:39.280 --> 0:03:40.840
<v Speaker 4>has to say about anything.

0:03:41.240 --> 0:03:43.520
<v Speaker 3>That's Brian Russell.

0:03:43.680 --> 0:03:48.840
<v Speaker 4>Unless there's some independent corroboration. Her word alone doesn't do anything.

0:03:49.320 --> 0:03:51.800
<v Speaker 4>The point is she's still at a minimum, let's say,

0:03:52.160 --> 0:03:57.000
<v Speaker 4>if even if it was just a fine, right, she

0:03:57.160 --> 0:04:00.640
<v Speaker 4>was still convicted of a Class amis demeanor, which is

0:04:00.680 --> 0:04:06.520
<v Speaker 4>what the probation is irrelevant to that fact that both

0:04:06.560 --> 0:04:10.960
<v Speaker 4>her and the prosecutor's office had a duty to tell

0:04:11.000 --> 0:04:15.080
<v Speaker 4>Byron that she was convicted of a Class A misdemeanor

0:04:15.880 --> 0:04:19.640
<v Speaker 4>during all of this, right during all of their investigation

0:04:19.760 --> 0:04:23.000
<v Speaker 4>and everything like that. So the fact that sorry, not

0:04:23.120 --> 0:04:26.279
<v Speaker 4>the fact her allegation that she didn't actually do any

0:04:26.400 --> 0:04:30.240
<v Speaker 4>jail time, which I still believed to be false. That

0:04:30.400 --> 0:04:33.279
<v Speaker 4>is irrelevant to this issue. That she was still convicted

0:04:33.440 --> 0:04:37.240
<v Speaker 4>of a Class A misdemeanor, and that this all happened

0:04:37.279 --> 0:04:42.520
<v Speaker 4>while she was quote unquote cooperating with the Jackson County

0:04:42.560 --> 0:04:46.520
<v Speaker 4>prosecutor right she had an incentive. She had an active

0:04:46.600 --> 0:04:50.440
<v Speaker 4>warrant out for her arrest. She admitted to you that

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:54.479
<v Speaker 4>she was picked up on that warrant by the Least

0:04:54.480 --> 0:04:58.280
<v Speaker 4>Summit Police Department, which was that was new information for us,

0:04:58.279 --> 0:05:00.440
<v Speaker 4>because we never knew where she was picked up on warrant.

0:05:00.440 --> 0:05:02.719
<v Speaker 4>We just knew that she was picked up one more so,

0:05:03.760 --> 0:05:06.840
<v Speaker 4>as far as what our response is to that is,

0:05:06.960 --> 0:05:09.359
<v Speaker 4>it's great. That's great. Thank you for telling us and

0:05:09.440 --> 0:05:12.120
<v Speaker 4>confirming that you were convicted of a Class A misdemeanor,

0:05:12.480 --> 0:05:15.160
<v Speaker 4>that you lied about it to Byron's defense counsel when

0:05:15.160 --> 0:05:17.039
<v Speaker 4>he asked if you had ever been convicted of a

0:05:17.040 --> 0:05:20.279
<v Speaker 4>felony or misdemeanor in state or federal court, and that

0:05:20.360 --> 0:05:24.120
<v Speaker 4>the prosecutor's office should have known about it, probably did

0:05:24.279 --> 0:05:28.120
<v Speaker 4>know about it and didn't do their job and fulfill

0:05:28.200 --> 0:05:31.720
<v Speaker 4>their duty to disclose that to Byron and his defense.

0:05:31.400 --> 0:05:33.760
<v Speaker 3>Team, here's Sean O'Brien.

0:05:34.480 --> 0:05:36.880
<v Speaker 5>You know, we had found the clerical error that they

0:05:36.960 --> 0:05:42.400
<v Speaker 5>had linked some unrelated person's case to her case net.

0:05:42.400 --> 0:05:46.560
<v Speaker 5>But that was a clerical error. Apparently doesn't negate any

0:05:46.560 --> 0:05:49.080
<v Speaker 5>of the other stuff. That's not his shock time, that's

0:05:49.120 --> 0:05:50.200
<v Speaker 5>not his judgment.

0:05:50.800 --> 0:05:51.480
<v Speaker 4>We know it's a.

0:05:51.440 --> 0:05:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Clerical error because I reached out to Christopher Class who's

0:05:54.200 --> 0:05:57.280
<v Speaker 1>the sheriff of Cooper County, and he did confirm that

0:05:57.320 --> 0:06:00.760
<v Speaker 1>she did two days of shock time. Okay, so Nicole,

0:06:00.800 --> 0:06:02.320
<v Speaker 1>and glad you brought that up, because I have your

0:06:02.320 --> 0:06:04.240
<v Speaker 1>email that you sent me and.

0:06:04.040 --> 0:06:07.360
<v Speaker 2>He does not He does not do that. I'll read

0:06:07.360 --> 0:06:08.240
<v Speaker 2>it to you, you said.

0:06:08.320 --> 0:06:11.479
<v Speaker 1>The email says, we've received your Sunshine Law requests for

0:06:11.560 --> 0:06:17.920
<v Speaker 1>information regarding detention records for Kelly Moffatt. Looking up information

0:06:18.000 --> 0:06:21.800
<v Speaker 1>on Moffitt, it was found through court records that she

0:06:22.000 --> 0:06:25.320
<v Speaker 1>was sentenced to two days jail time back on April third,

0:06:25.360 --> 0:06:27.839
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and one, on a littering case. On a

0:06:27.880 --> 0:06:31.280
<v Speaker 1>littering case, those records have since been destroyed in accordance

0:06:31.320 --> 0:06:35.080
<v Speaker 1>with our retention schedule. We show no other incarceration for Moffitt,

0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:37.200
<v Speaker 1>and our records. If you have any further questions, please

0:06:37.240 --> 0:06:40.040
<v Speaker 1>feel free to contact the sheriff's office. So they're basically saying,

0:06:40.080 --> 0:06:42.960
<v Speaker 1>we don't have any records that she was detained. We

0:06:43.040 --> 0:06:46.120
<v Speaker 1>are looking at the court records, which seemed to be erroneous,

0:06:47.200 --> 0:06:50.320
<v Speaker 1>and that's what they're referencing. They don't say that she

0:06:50.400 --> 0:06:51.400
<v Speaker 1>spent any time there.

0:06:51.880 --> 0:06:54.760
<v Speaker 5>Well, in other words, she owes Boone County two days

0:06:54.760 --> 0:06:58.080
<v Speaker 5>of shock time. Is what that means. I mean, you know,

0:06:58.160 --> 0:07:02.840
<v Speaker 5>we've looked at you know, three lawyers have looked this over.

0:07:04.400 --> 0:07:07.479
<v Speaker 5>She owes Boone County two day shock time. And what

0:07:07.600 --> 0:07:10.200
<v Speaker 5>the sheriff is saying, we don't have the jail records,

0:07:10.240 --> 0:07:12.960
<v Speaker 5>but the court order to do them. She probably did them,

0:07:12.960 --> 0:07:16.320
<v Speaker 5>and if she did them, their records are destroyed. That's

0:07:16.360 --> 0:07:17.440
<v Speaker 5>what that means.

0:07:17.840 --> 0:07:22.520
<v Speaker 4>Another component of this is Kelly claims that she was

0:07:22.560 --> 0:07:26.560
<v Speaker 4>never arrested. Well, we have a record from the Missouri

0:07:26.600 --> 0:07:31.160
<v Speaker 4>State Highway Patrol from April fifteenth of two thousand that

0:07:31.360 --> 0:07:32.640
<v Speaker 4>says that she was arrested.

0:07:33.120 --> 0:07:35.480
<v Speaker 5>This is the thing you have to understand about dealing

0:07:35.520 --> 0:07:39.160
<v Speaker 5>with Kelly. She's the kind of liar who will tell

0:07:39.160 --> 0:07:41.280
<v Speaker 5>a lie to cover a lie, to cover a lie,

0:07:41.880 --> 0:07:45.400
<v Speaker 5>and she demonstrated that to you in your last episode

0:07:45.400 --> 0:07:48.200
<v Speaker 5>that we listened. We heard that several times.

0:07:48.080 --> 0:07:52.080
<v Speaker 1>And with all due respect, I just can't look at

0:07:52.120 --> 0:07:56.400
<v Speaker 1>this and say definitively that she's tolling a lie.

0:07:56.760 --> 0:07:58.600
<v Speaker 6>Then you should look at other records that are going

0:07:58.640 --> 0:07:59.600
<v Speaker 6>to corroborate that date.

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Let me finish, because but you guys, where are they?

0:08:03.160 --> 0:08:05.720
<v Speaker 1>Where are the records that corroborate that she actually went

0:08:05.720 --> 0:08:09.320
<v Speaker 1>to jail or I mean, or was even sentenced to it.

0:08:10.080 --> 0:08:12.720
<v Speaker 1>All I'm saying is, if we look at this, she

0:08:13.440 --> 0:08:18.000
<v Speaker 1>seemed very confused about the two days, forty eight hours

0:08:18.000 --> 0:08:21.400
<v Speaker 1>of shock, jail time, and the two years probation. She

0:08:21.520 --> 0:08:26.440
<v Speaker 1>also said when she was asked in her deposition, you

0:08:26.480 --> 0:08:29.240
<v Speaker 1>know about if she had been in trouble with the law,

0:08:29.600 --> 0:08:32.240
<v Speaker 1>she didn't really consider a littering charge in a fine

0:08:32.480 --> 0:08:36.000
<v Speaker 1>that big of a deal. But what about pick a

0:08:36.080 --> 0:08:38.600
<v Speaker 1>warrant and extra died it to a different county?

0:08:39.000 --> 0:08:39.320
<v Speaker 4>Right?

0:08:39.520 --> 0:08:41.640
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, why would she be extradited to a different county

0:08:41.880 --> 0:08:42.920
<v Speaker 6>if there wasn't a big deal.

0:08:43.160 --> 0:08:46.319
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, they issued a warrant for her arrest, a bench warrant,

0:08:46.520 --> 0:08:49.079
<v Speaker 4>and she was arrested on that bench warrant. And here

0:08:49.160 --> 0:08:52.800
<v Speaker 4>she is saying that to be extradited. For hold On

0:08:53.160 --> 0:08:56.520
<v Speaker 4>to be extradited from Jackson County to Cooper County would

0:08:56.520 --> 0:08:59.000
<v Speaker 4>have taken more than a day or two. She was

0:08:59.040 --> 0:09:03.080
<v Speaker 4>in jail somewhat. Maybe she wasn't in jail in Cooper County.

0:09:03.080 --> 0:09:06.360
<v Speaker 4>Maybe the judge in Cooper County said, oh, you said

0:09:06.400 --> 0:09:09.360
<v Speaker 4>in the Jackson County jail, or in the least summit

0:09:09.480 --> 0:09:12.920
<v Speaker 4>jail for two days while you were waiting to get

0:09:12.920 --> 0:09:15.360
<v Speaker 4>extradited here to plead guilty to this fine, we're going

0:09:15.400 --> 0:09:18.960
<v Speaker 4>to credit you for that two days. But we don't

0:09:19.000 --> 0:09:21.520
<v Speaker 4>know this. But you don't know And why don't we

0:09:21.559 --> 0:09:23.760
<v Speaker 4>know it, Leah, We don't know it because the Jackson

0:09:23.800 --> 0:09:28.280
<v Speaker 4>County Prosecutor's office hid it. They did not disclose they

0:09:28.320 --> 0:09:32.719
<v Speaker 4>had Kelly was a minor on this charge too, and

0:09:32.800 --> 0:09:37.080
<v Speaker 4>so they knew about this. There's no reason they shouldn't

0:09:37.080 --> 0:09:40.120
<v Speaker 4>have known about this, and they failed to disclose it.

0:09:40.160 --> 0:09:43.079
<v Speaker 4>And it wasn't until twenty years later that we're finding it,

0:09:43.320 --> 0:09:45.559
<v Speaker 4>and all the records have been destroyed, and so we're

0:09:45.640 --> 0:09:49.800
<v Speaker 4>trying to piece together what happened as best we can.

0:09:50.720 --> 0:09:53.160
<v Speaker 4>But as far as what Kelly has to say about it,

0:09:53.240 --> 0:09:56.760
<v Speaker 4>or what her memory, says, it's funny that she you know,

0:09:57.400 --> 0:10:00.920
<v Speaker 4>it's funny the things that she remembers so is vividly,

0:10:01.800 --> 0:10:03.880
<v Speaker 4>and then the things she has no memory of or

0:10:03.960 --> 0:10:07.640
<v Speaker 4>she's not sure about. And so, as far as for

0:10:07.720 --> 0:10:11.360
<v Speaker 4>our purposes and for Byron's purposes, all that really matters

0:10:11.840 --> 0:10:14.680
<v Speaker 4>is that she was convicted of a class amiss.

0:10:14.360 --> 0:10:17.440
<v Speaker 5>To mean, and she responded to a question about it

0:10:17.480 --> 0:10:20.640
<v Speaker 5>by saying, I've never even been in trouble with the police.

0:10:21.480 --> 0:10:24.120
<v Speaker 5>She told you she was taken in custody on a warrant.

0:10:24.640 --> 0:10:27.240
<v Speaker 4>Right, If that's not trouble with them, I think we

0:10:27.280 --> 0:10:30.880
<v Speaker 4>would all remember getting arrested and picked up on a

0:10:30.880 --> 0:10:33.240
<v Speaker 4>warrant and having to sit in jail and wait to

0:10:33.280 --> 0:10:37.200
<v Speaker 4>get transferred to another county and to use her word.

0:10:37.080 --> 0:10:39.679
<v Speaker 2>Extradited, I hear you.

0:10:40.920 --> 0:10:43.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, just so you know, I was up all

0:10:43.320 --> 0:10:46.440
<v Speaker 1>night like this does not sit well with me. This

0:10:46.600 --> 0:10:50.600
<v Speaker 1>is troubling to me. It's troubling because I didn't pick

0:10:50.679 --> 0:10:53.040
<v Speaker 1>up on there being another case number as many times

0:10:53.040 --> 0:10:54.320
<v Speaker 1>as I've looked at this docket.

0:10:54.559 --> 0:10:56.640
<v Speaker 2>The fact that I didn't pick up on that, and.

0:10:56.559 --> 0:10:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Also a large part of the case, or you know,

0:11:00.280 --> 0:11:03.760
<v Speaker 1>a large part of the case is that Kelly is

0:11:03.840 --> 0:11:07.360
<v Speaker 1>a drug addicted liar that was in bigger trouble and

0:11:07.400 --> 0:11:09.800
<v Speaker 1>flipped on Byron in order to get out of the

0:11:09.800 --> 0:11:10.520
<v Speaker 1>bigger trouble.

0:11:11.000 --> 0:11:13.079
<v Speaker 2>We absolutely don't know that to be the fact.

0:11:13.160 --> 0:11:17.080
<v Speaker 1>We don't know that she was actually sentenced to that

0:11:17.200 --> 0:11:20.960
<v Speaker 1>this is actually her sentence. If that case number that's

0:11:21.000 --> 0:11:25.440
<v Speaker 1>on there is wrong, we don't know that the sentence

0:11:25.480 --> 0:11:28.079
<v Speaker 1>on there is wrong. Because stay with me for one second.

0:11:28.679 --> 0:11:33.960
<v Speaker 1>On another page of these docket records, the page that

0:11:34.000 --> 0:11:38.360
<v Speaker 1>talks about her sentence, stand by yeah, On the page

0:11:38.400 --> 0:11:44.520
<v Speaker 1>that talks about charges and sentence. Under sentence, it says fine, fine,

0:11:44.720 --> 0:11:50.360
<v Speaker 1>fourteen dollars and ninety five cents. So where is where

0:11:50.480 --> 0:11:54.440
<v Speaker 1>is the sentence of forty eight hours shock, jail time

0:11:54.520 --> 0:11:55.520
<v Speaker 1>in two years probation.

0:11:56.200 --> 0:11:56.960
<v Speaker 2>I can hold it up.

0:11:57.240 --> 0:12:00.360
<v Speaker 4>I can't not. Yeah, I'm looking at it on line

0:12:00.440 --> 0:12:00.840
<v Speaker 4>right now.

0:12:01.400 --> 0:12:02.640
<v Speaker 3>Here's Quinn O'Brien.

0:12:03.559 --> 0:12:08.080
<v Speaker 6>She still lied, And I mean, we keep forgetting that

0:12:08.480 --> 0:12:11.440
<v Speaker 6>a medical examiner has said that her version of events

0:12:12.200 --> 0:12:15.480
<v Speaker 6>is totally impossible, that it's a Hollywood fiction. We're forgetting that.

0:12:15.840 --> 0:12:19.560
<v Speaker 6>Don Rand and other gas station attendants told people at

0:12:19.559 --> 0:12:22.240
<v Speaker 6>one time or another that they saw someone get out

0:12:22.240 --> 0:12:25.360
<v Speaker 6>of a car and go use a payphone. We're forgetting that.

0:12:25.480 --> 0:12:28.960
<v Speaker 6>Bob told the Fishers that he saw Anastasia later that

0:12:29.080 --> 0:12:30.959
<v Speaker 6>night and tried to get her to get in the car.

0:12:31.200 --> 0:12:34.520
<v Speaker 6>There's just so much out there that shows that Kelly's

0:12:34.559 --> 0:12:38.480
<v Speaker 6>story is false. That you know, these these little things

0:12:38.600 --> 0:12:41.800
<v Speaker 6>are I mean, at what point are we just? I mean,

0:12:42.280 --> 0:12:45.480
<v Speaker 6>you're asking us to prove that there was a clerical

0:12:45.600 --> 0:12:51.080
<v Speaker 6>error rather than you know, have Kelly prove that she

0:12:51.320 --> 0:12:54.800
<v Speaker 6>wasn't in prison, Make her prove that she wasn't in jail.

0:12:55.200 --> 0:12:57.440
<v Speaker 6>Have her prove that. Show ask her where she was,

0:12:57.480 --> 0:13:00.000
<v Speaker 6>what she was doing, If she wasn't doing shocked time,

0:13:00.240 --> 0:13:02.360
<v Speaker 6>what was she doing, where was she made?

0:13:02.400 --> 0:13:04.480
<v Speaker 1>It's not up to her to prove it. It's up

0:13:04.520 --> 0:13:06.640
<v Speaker 1>to you, guys to prove it. Right and again I

0:13:06.640 --> 0:13:08.520
<v Speaker 1>say this with all due respect, but it's up to you.

0:13:08.600 --> 0:13:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Guys are making the allegations. It's up to you to

0:13:11.160 --> 0:13:14.040
<v Speaker 1>prove it, not to Kelly. I mean, Kelly's just I'm

0:13:14.040 --> 0:13:17.640
<v Speaker 1>telling you what she said. This is what you guys

0:13:17.760 --> 0:13:20.280
<v Speaker 1>have done, have gone after her credibility left and right.

0:13:20.320 --> 0:13:23.080
<v Speaker 1>She says, I have not told a lie, and I

0:13:23.080 --> 0:13:25.680
<v Speaker 1>can hear your laughter about to come in, but she says,

0:13:25.720 --> 0:13:28.200
<v Speaker 1>I've not told a lie since I've come forward, and

0:13:28.240 --> 0:13:30.320
<v Speaker 1>this is an example of the stuff that has been

0:13:30.400 --> 0:13:34.760
<v Speaker 1>used against her to discredit her. And so it's not

0:13:34.920 --> 0:13:37.840
<v Speaker 1>her job to prove this. It's your job if you

0:13:37.880 --> 0:13:39.199
<v Speaker 1>make the allegation.

0:13:38.800 --> 0:13:41.559
<v Speaker 6>Bia, It's not your job to give her a parachute

0:13:41.559 --> 0:13:43.480
<v Speaker 6>out of these things either, Like when she started to

0:13:43.520 --> 0:13:47.120
<v Speaker 6>say that if she and Byron weren't interrogated together, that

0:13:47.200 --> 0:13:50.520
<v Speaker 6>she might have gone ahead and admitted or hum forward,

0:13:50.559 --> 0:13:53.520
<v Speaker 6>not admitted. If she and Byron hadn't been interrogated together,

0:13:53.960 --> 0:13:58.200
<v Speaker 6>then she would have talked about seeing the death. You

0:13:58.240 --> 0:14:01.360
<v Speaker 6>stepped in and said, well, the records say that you

0:14:01.600 --> 0:14:04.800
<v Speaker 6>weren't interrogated together, and she said, oh, oh, oh, you're right.

0:14:05.120 --> 0:14:08.079
<v Speaker 6>So she gets a parachute out of her lies.

0:14:08.559 --> 0:14:10.160
<v Speaker 2>And I don't think that's a parachute.

0:14:10.200 --> 0:14:12.440
<v Speaker 1>I think I was taking her to task, like I

0:14:12.559 --> 0:14:15.320
<v Speaker 1>was pointing out that what she said was untrue. I

0:14:15.320 --> 0:14:17.760
<v Speaker 1>don't think that's a parachute I was giving her.

0:14:18.200 --> 0:14:20.200
<v Speaker 6>I would have let her go. I would have asked

0:14:20.200 --> 0:14:23.160
<v Speaker 6>her so in that interrogation together, what happened?

0:14:23.320 --> 0:14:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Okay, but this isn't about me, right, now I've already

0:14:25.920 --> 0:14:29.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm like admitting that I've messed up by not even

0:14:29.320 --> 0:14:33.360
<v Speaker 1>recognizing that there was, you know, a different case number

0:14:33.400 --> 0:14:36.080
<v Speaker 1>next to the sentence that differed from the case number

0:14:36.080 --> 0:14:38.360
<v Speaker 1>on the upper left hand corner or the upper you know,

0:14:38.400 --> 0:14:38.600
<v Speaker 1>on the.

0:14:38.600 --> 0:14:39.280
<v Speaker 2>Top of the page.

0:14:39.320 --> 0:14:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Like I should have should have I should have figured

0:14:42.000 --> 0:14:43.560
<v Speaker 1>this out a long time ago and asked you guys

0:14:43.600 --> 0:14:44.720
<v Speaker 1>a long time ago about this.

0:14:45.440 --> 0:14:47.520
<v Speaker 6>So, yeah, we've known about it for a long time.

0:14:48.120 --> 0:14:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Nobody said anything. Nobody, nobody has said anything. So everyone,

0:14:52.520 --> 0:14:56.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we've been moving forward as if she did

0:14:56.880 --> 0:15:01.200
<v Speaker 1>time in jail and was on probation. I don't. Well, again,

0:15:01.600 --> 0:15:03.720
<v Speaker 1>there's no proof of that right now, there is no

0:15:03.840 --> 0:15:06.800
<v Speaker 1>proof of that. If you have proof, then please what

0:15:06.960 --> 0:15:18.440
<v Speaker 1>sure we do we have proof of that? Where's the

0:15:18.480 --> 0:15:19.720
<v Speaker 1>proof that she was in jail?

0:15:20.120 --> 0:15:22.360
<v Speaker 4>Here, let me show you that she was in jail.

0:15:22.480 --> 0:15:24.840
<v Speaker 4>She admitted to it. What are you talking about? She

0:15:24.920 --> 0:15:26.760
<v Speaker 4>just admitted to it. She said she was arrested in

0:15:26.880 --> 0:15:27.800
<v Speaker 4>least summit.

0:15:27.720 --> 0:15:30.040
<v Speaker 2>But she didn't. I'm talking about getting sentenced.

0:15:30.040 --> 0:15:33.000
<v Speaker 1>So she pled guilty and that her sentence is supposed

0:15:33.040 --> 0:15:35.640
<v Speaker 1>to be forty eight hours in jail in two years probation.

0:15:35.920 --> 0:15:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Where is the proof that that actually was the case.

0:15:38.800 --> 0:15:42.560
<v Speaker 1>And here's another question, and I actually don't know this answer.

0:15:42.640 --> 0:15:43.920
<v Speaker 1>I think I know the answer, but I'm going to

0:15:43.960 --> 0:15:46.400
<v Speaker 1>ask you, if you're on probation, do you get a

0:15:46.400 --> 0:15:47.320
<v Speaker 1>probation officer.

0:15:47.760 --> 0:15:50.800
<v Speaker 4>We tried to find her probation officer and all of that.

0:15:50.920 --> 0:15:53.560
<v Speaker 4>But here's the thing. She was a juvenile on this thing.

0:15:53.760 --> 0:15:57.040
<v Speaker 4>So those are all closed records. We can't get it

0:15:57.120 --> 0:15:58.720
<v Speaker 4>that until we file the havienes.

0:15:58.920 --> 0:16:01.240
<v Speaker 2>But you don't know that they're as a probation officer.

0:16:01.560 --> 0:16:03.880
<v Speaker 4>Correct, Yeah, I don't know that she had a probation officer.

0:16:04.160 --> 0:16:06.840
<v Speaker 4>And the other thing that we have looked into was

0:16:07.280 --> 0:16:11.280
<v Speaker 4>she was a Kansas resident at the time, but on

0:16:11.360 --> 0:16:16.840
<v Speaker 4>Missouri probation. So there's a weird It's like, okay, well,

0:16:16.840 --> 0:16:20.320
<v Speaker 4>would she have gotten a Kansas probation officer? You know,

0:16:20.320 --> 0:16:22.400
<v Speaker 4>would that have been put over there to do that?

0:16:22.600 --> 0:16:24.560
<v Speaker 4>And you know, we still believe that she was put

0:16:24.600 --> 0:16:28.240
<v Speaker 4>on probation, which would totally make sense because when all

0:16:28.280 --> 0:16:32.280
<v Speaker 4>of this happens, she's supposed to be quote unquote cooperating

0:16:32.320 --> 0:16:35.840
<v Speaker 4>with the Jackson County Prosecutor's office. Right in December of

0:16:35.880 --> 0:16:40.480
<v Speaker 4>two thousand, they put this tape recorder in the Moffit residence.

0:16:40.760 --> 0:16:44.920
<v Speaker 4>Right months go by, no phone calls with Byron, no

0:16:45.120 --> 0:16:49.040
<v Speaker 4>no reported attempts of phone calls with Byron. Kelly seems

0:16:49.080 --> 0:16:53.600
<v Speaker 4>to disappear because there's literally no reports. Then she gets

0:16:53.680 --> 0:16:57.760
<v Speaker 4>picked up on this warrant, pleads guilty. We still believe,

0:16:58.400 --> 0:17:01.360
<v Speaker 4>sentenced to two days shock time with probation. But let's

0:17:01.360 --> 0:17:03.720
<v Speaker 4>say she's not. Let's say she's just convicted of a

0:17:03.760 --> 0:17:06.919
<v Speaker 4>Class A misdemeanor. The reason it makes sense for her

0:17:06.960 --> 0:17:10.119
<v Speaker 4>to be sentenced to two years probation is so the

0:17:10.160 --> 0:17:15.080
<v Speaker 4>prosecutors have control over her during the pendency of the

0:17:15.560 --> 0:17:20.840
<v Speaker 4>rest of their investigation and prosecution into Byron. Right so,

0:17:21.760 --> 0:17:24.520
<v Speaker 4>and then it's two months after this guilty plead that

0:17:24.640 --> 0:17:28.119
<v Speaker 4>she finally gets Byron on the phone. But I wanted

0:17:28.119 --> 0:17:30.159
<v Speaker 4>to point out too, and I tried to share my screen,

0:17:30.160 --> 0:17:33.280
<v Speaker 4>but I can't. I can email you this document I

0:17:33.320 --> 0:17:36.960
<v Speaker 4>have because we took screenshots of this back when we

0:17:37.040 --> 0:17:40.200
<v Speaker 4>found it, and I'm looking at the screen shot of

0:17:41.119 --> 0:17:43.919
<v Speaker 4>it now, not the screenshot. I'm looking at the screen

0:17:44.000 --> 0:17:46.399
<v Speaker 4>on case net right now, and it looks like it

0:17:46.440 --> 0:17:49.760
<v Speaker 4>has been altered from when we first found it and

0:17:49.800 --> 0:17:53.120
<v Speaker 4>gathered it because it used to say on April third,

0:17:53.160 --> 0:17:56.679
<v Speaker 4>two thousand and one, judgment entered SEES which stands for

0:17:56.920 --> 0:18:01.320
<v Speaker 4>suspended execution of sentence thirty days, can secut with case number,

0:18:01.520 --> 0:18:04.480
<v Speaker 4>consecutive with case number, you know, and then that's the

0:18:04.480 --> 0:18:07.000
<v Speaker 4>case number we're talking about, which is related to somebody

0:18:07.040 --> 0:18:12.919
<v Speaker 4>different forty eight hours shot time probation two years right now,

0:18:13.600 --> 0:18:17.359
<v Speaker 4>and then under that entry it says guiltyply. Now on

0:18:17.640 --> 0:18:20.840
<v Speaker 4>live on case Net it just says April third, two

0:18:20.920 --> 0:18:24.840
<v Speaker 4>thousand and one, guiltyply. It doesn't have judgment entered on

0:18:24.880 --> 0:18:28.320
<v Speaker 4>that docket report like it used to. So something somebody

0:18:28.320 --> 0:18:30.520
<v Speaker 4>got on there and changed something and I don't know

0:18:30.560 --> 0:18:32.399
<v Speaker 4>why that happened, and I don't know who did that,

0:18:32.920 --> 0:18:35.879
<v Speaker 4>but that's new. That is also new information for us.

0:18:36.880 --> 0:18:40.360
<v Speaker 3>This is true. There are two dockets.

0:18:40.720 --> 0:18:43.960
<v Speaker 1>The one Cooper County sent me on April sixteenth, twenty

0:18:44.040 --> 0:18:47.320
<v Speaker 1>twenty four. In the middle of the page, under sentence

0:18:47.680 --> 0:18:52.320
<v Speaker 1>it says fine. Then under total case fine imposed it

0:18:52.400 --> 0:18:56.200
<v Speaker 1>says fourteen dollars and ninety five cents. In the docket

0:18:56.240 --> 0:19:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Byron's legal team sent me, which they pulled on October two,

0:19:00.000 --> 0:19:02.879
<v Speaker 1>twelfth twenty twenty one. In the middle of the page,

0:19:02.960 --> 0:19:05.840
<v Speaker 1>it says Kelly was sentenced to a fine of fourteen

0:19:05.880 --> 0:19:09.480
<v Speaker 1>dollars and ninety five cents, just like the one Cooper

0:19:09.520 --> 0:19:13.560
<v Speaker 1>County sent me, but lowered down on that page, in

0:19:13.600 --> 0:19:16.600
<v Speaker 1>the itemized list of events that happened in the case

0:19:17.200 --> 0:19:20.320
<v Speaker 1>on April third, two thousand and one, there is that

0:19:20.440 --> 0:19:24.080
<v Speaker 1>other person's case number, and next to it is the

0:19:24.119 --> 0:19:27.680
<v Speaker 1>sentence of forty eight hours shock jail time and two

0:19:27.760 --> 0:19:28.600
<v Speaker 1>years probation.

0:19:29.520 --> 0:19:33.680
<v Speaker 3>So what the hell which sentence is the real one?

0:19:33.960 --> 0:19:37.120
<v Speaker 1>When was the forty eight hours shock jail time two

0:19:37.200 --> 0:19:41.159
<v Speaker 1>years probation erased from the docket? It had to have

0:19:41.200 --> 0:19:44.639
<v Speaker 1>been some time between October of twenty twenty one and

0:19:44.720 --> 0:19:46.560
<v Speaker 1>April of twenty twenty four.

0:19:47.800 --> 0:19:51.520
<v Speaker 3>Who did it and why? By the way, I.

0:19:51.560 --> 0:19:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Had asked Byron's legal team about these two different court

0:19:55.160 --> 0:20:00.680
<v Speaker 1>dockets before, because one had the sentence forty eight hours

0:20:00.680 --> 0:20:03.080
<v Speaker 1>shock jail time and two years probation and the other

0:20:03.119 --> 0:20:06.800
<v Speaker 1>one didn't have it. They said it was because there

0:20:06.840 --> 0:20:10.120
<v Speaker 1>was a difference between what information a lawyer can access

0:20:10.160 --> 0:20:14.520
<v Speaker 1>on case net, Missouri's legal case database and what the

0:20:14.600 --> 0:20:19.440
<v Speaker 1>general public can. Not sure if that's what happened or

0:20:19.680 --> 0:20:23.960
<v Speaker 1>if it's something else. In an attempt to get some

0:20:24.160 --> 0:20:27.840
<v Speaker 1>clarity on Kelly's two different court dockets and whether or

0:20:27.920 --> 0:20:31.080
<v Speaker 1>not she was ever sentenced to forty eight hours in

0:20:31.160 --> 0:20:35.000
<v Speaker 1>jail and two years probation, I email the Jackson County

0:20:35.040 --> 0:20:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Prosecutor's office to see if they will answer my questions

0:20:38.760 --> 0:20:43.119
<v Speaker 1>at least about this. Remember, months ago, I was told

0:20:43.119 --> 0:20:46.560
<v Speaker 1>that it wouldn't be appropriate for Prosecutor Teresa Crayon to

0:20:46.560 --> 0:20:51.200
<v Speaker 1>speak until all litigation in this case is complete. When

0:20:51.200 --> 0:20:54.840
<v Speaker 1>the prosecutor's office responds, they say the same thing, They

0:20:54.920 --> 0:20:59.040
<v Speaker 1>can't comment until all litigation is complete on this matter

0:21:00.119 --> 0:21:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Nicole again, and the state was able to find Byron's

0:21:04.000 --> 0:21:06.320
<v Speaker 1>records in a different county, They did a background check

0:21:06.359 --> 0:21:09.160
<v Speaker 1>on him, brought it to trial. Why didn't you need

0:21:09.160 --> 0:21:10.760
<v Speaker 1>to tell me they didn't do that with Kelly and

0:21:10.800 --> 0:21:13.280
<v Speaker 1>brought it to trial. And so there is the presumption

0:21:13.440 --> 0:21:15.440
<v Speaker 1>of this wasn't disclosed and.

0:21:15.280 --> 0:21:18.400
<v Speaker 2>Why I mean, and I think that we're.

0:21:18.440 --> 0:21:22.399
<v Speaker 1>Allowed to hypothesize of all the reasons that someone would

0:21:23.160 --> 0:21:26.400
<v Speaker 1>in Kelly's position would implicate.

0:21:26.240 --> 0:21:27.600
<v Speaker 4>Somebody else in a murder.

0:21:27.640 --> 0:21:30.360
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we're allowed to do that, but Brian's right.

0:21:30.720 --> 0:21:32.440
<v Speaker 1>The fact of the matter is is that they didn't

0:21:32.440 --> 0:21:34.680
<v Speaker 1>disclose it and they had a duty to right.

0:21:34.760 --> 0:21:37.119
<v Speaker 4>And we have court records that say that she was

0:21:37.160 --> 0:21:40.399
<v Speaker 4>on shot time, two days of shot time with a

0:21:40.440 --> 0:21:44.000
<v Speaker 4>thirty day backup in two years probation. That's what the

0:21:44.040 --> 0:21:46.960
<v Speaker 4>records we have say. She might say that that's not

0:21:47.000 --> 0:21:49.000
<v Speaker 4>true and that's not what happened, and that's fine, you

0:21:49.040 --> 0:21:52.080
<v Speaker 4>know what. That's what this process is for. And maybe

0:21:52.119 --> 0:21:55.040
<v Speaker 4>we find out that she wasn't sentenced to two days

0:21:55.040 --> 0:21:57.480
<v Speaker 4>of shock time, but at a minimum, she was still

0:21:57.520 --> 0:22:00.960
<v Speaker 4>convicted of a class A mystery, right, and that's what

0:22:01.040 --> 0:22:02.359
<v Speaker 4>they had a duty to disclose.

0:22:03.119 --> 0:22:04.920
<v Speaker 2>So I think there are two issues, right.

0:22:05.440 --> 0:22:10.440
<v Speaker 1>I think it's I mean, you have been putting forth

0:22:10.720 --> 0:22:14.080
<v Speaker 1>the theory that she got into this bigger trouble, and

0:22:14.200 --> 0:22:16.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, Kelly is a drug addicted liar and she,

0:22:18.000 --> 0:22:21.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, was in this bigger trouble and that's why

0:22:21.680 --> 0:22:26.440
<v Speaker 1>she flipped and worked with prosecutors. That doesn't seem as

0:22:26.520 --> 0:22:28.600
<v Speaker 1>plausible as it did before.

0:22:29.119 --> 0:22:31.359
<v Speaker 6>I think that's another statement of the theory though, And

0:22:31.760 --> 0:22:34.680
<v Speaker 6>can I can I correct the theory really quick that

0:22:35.840 --> 0:22:40.159
<v Speaker 6>she Our theory is that this case connected her to

0:22:40.400 --> 0:22:43.880
<v Speaker 6>the prosecution, that she could have been in much more

0:22:43.960 --> 0:22:48.000
<v Speaker 6>trouble if she hadn't worked with prosecutors to get out

0:22:48.000 --> 0:22:48.240
<v Speaker 6>of it.

0:22:49.400 --> 0:22:53.359
<v Speaker 1>Let's go back for one second and look at the timeline.

0:22:53.880 --> 0:22:57.800
<v Speaker 1>Kelly was arrested in April of two thousand on this

0:22:57.880 --> 0:23:02.200
<v Speaker 1>littering charge. She didn't up for her arraignment in June

0:23:02.520 --> 0:23:07.320
<v Speaker 1>of two thousand, That's when the warrant was issued three

0:23:07.320 --> 0:23:12.080
<v Speaker 1>months later in September of two thousand. Kelly was basically

0:23:12.160 --> 0:23:15.479
<v Speaker 1>made to come forward when her drug counselor went to

0:23:15.560 --> 0:23:21.800
<v Speaker 1>the authorities. So when was Kelly allegedly incentivized to work

0:23:21.840 --> 0:23:25.480
<v Speaker 1>with prosecutors. Was it between when she got the littering

0:23:25.600 --> 0:23:30.880
<v Speaker 1>charge and when she came forward, so between April and September?

0:23:31.680 --> 0:23:35.440
<v Speaker 1>Or was it between when she came forward and when

0:23:35.440 --> 0:23:39.080
<v Speaker 1>she was picked up on the warrant, so between September

0:23:39.240 --> 0:23:42.399
<v Speaker 1>and the following April. I went back and found a

0:23:42.440 --> 0:23:47.840
<v Speaker 1>report Kilgore wrote on September twentieth, two thousand, the day

0:23:48.000 --> 0:23:53.360
<v Speaker 1>after Kelly came forward. Kilgore wrote quote, Apparently Ms Moffatt

0:23:53.520 --> 0:23:57.520
<v Speaker 1>offered to tape record a conversation with Byron Case and

0:23:57.640 --> 0:24:00.960
<v Speaker 1>try to get him to admit to the shooting. Mister

0:24:01.080 --> 0:24:05.480
<v Speaker 1>Beard and Ms McGowan were in favor of attempting the recording,

0:24:06.080 --> 0:24:10.199
<v Speaker 1>So it seems it was Kelly's idea to try and

0:24:10.240 --> 0:24:14.720
<v Speaker 1>record Byron confessing, and this happened around the time she

0:24:14.840 --> 0:24:18.440
<v Speaker 1>came forward. What would be the point in a quid

0:24:18.560 --> 0:24:22.600
<v Speaker 1>pro quo scenario with prosecutors. Was it to point the

0:24:22.640 --> 0:24:26.040
<v Speaker 1>finger at Byron because it seems she had already done that,

0:24:27.119 --> 0:24:30.240
<v Speaker 1>or was it to finally get Byron on the phone

0:24:30.280 --> 0:24:33.720
<v Speaker 1>and again, remember it was her idea to do that.

0:24:34.600 --> 0:24:37.639
<v Speaker 6>Back to Quinn, I still don't know if that's the

0:24:37.720 --> 0:24:40.000
<v Speaker 6>case because a lot of those records are going to

0:24:40.040 --> 0:24:43.840
<v Speaker 6>be confidential because she's a juvenile, and some of these

0:24:43.880 --> 0:24:46.840
<v Speaker 6>records are you going to be things that we can't

0:24:46.840 --> 0:24:50.439
<v Speaker 6>get until the behavior is proceeding. But she was on

0:24:50.520 --> 0:24:54.320
<v Speaker 6>the prosecution's radar. She's an addict, and this is the

0:24:54.359 --> 0:24:58.840
<v Speaker 6>case that you know, we know about. We're not saying

0:24:58.920 --> 0:25:04.920
<v Speaker 6>that she did this to how to put this? Somebody

0:25:04.920 --> 0:25:06.080
<v Speaker 6>helped me out, your dad, you know what I want?

0:25:06.600 --> 0:25:11.359
<v Speaker 5>Yeah. The point is when somebody is addicted, the prospect

0:25:11.359 --> 0:25:16.560
<v Speaker 5>of one night in jail is terrifying because that means

0:25:16.840 --> 0:25:22.159
<v Speaker 5>withdrawal that means cold Turkey, and so that's incentive for

0:25:22.200 --> 0:25:27.359
<v Speaker 5>her to cooperate with the police. But why she decided

0:25:27.359 --> 0:25:31.399
<v Speaker 5>to implicate Byron is a much much different, more complex

0:25:31.480 --> 0:25:35.879
<v Speaker 5>thing than what you've described. I think that she lied

0:25:36.000 --> 0:25:40.080
<v Speaker 5>multiple times to multiple people about why she's an addict,

0:25:40.840 --> 0:25:44.320
<v Speaker 5>why she has this drug problem. She says, because I

0:25:44.359 --> 0:25:47.600
<v Speaker 5>saw Anastasia murdered, and then she says, because I saw

0:25:47.800 --> 0:25:51.240
<v Speaker 5>Justin murder Anastasia, and then she changes that to Byron.

0:25:51.840 --> 0:25:54.840
<v Speaker 5>So she tells this lie because it's convenient at the

0:25:54.920 --> 0:25:59.359
<v Speaker 5>moment at the time. And then when she finally tells

0:25:59.359 --> 0:26:03.399
<v Speaker 5>a therapist and a therapist says, you go to the

0:26:03.400 --> 0:26:07.840
<v Speaker 5>police or I will. Now suddenly the lie is locked in,

0:26:08.359 --> 0:26:11.240
<v Speaker 5>and she doesn't have a choice but to go through

0:26:11.680 --> 0:26:14.560
<v Speaker 5>with the lie that she's been telling. And so if

0:26:14.600 --> 0:26:18.600
<v Speaker 5>she's under stress, it's a stress of being locked into

0:26:18.640 --> 0:26:22.359
<v Speaker 5>a lie that she now can't get out of. And

0:26:22.440 --> 0:26:25.080
<v Speaker 5>so she ends up going to a lawyer, going to

0:26:25.119 --> 0:26:29.480
<v Speaker 5>the prosecution. And so why the delay of months and

0:26:29.560 --> 0:26:34.679
<v Speaker 5>months and months between her cooperation decision and getting Byron

0:26:34.760 --> 0:26:39.479
<v Speaker 5>on the phone to you know, try to trap him

0:26:39.520 --> 0:26:42.080
<v Speaker 5>into saying something incriminating.

0:26:42.000 --> 0:26:45.080
<v Speaker 1>That's not how Kelly sees it. Kelly mentioned in the

0:26:45.160 --> 0:26:48.600
<v Speaker 1>last episode that she had been accused of stalking Byron.

0:26:49.119 --> 0:26:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Kelly said, well, the police were the ones who gave

0:26:52.040 --> 0:26:55.680
<v Speaker 1>her his number, So maybe Kelly had tried calling Byron

0:26:55.840 --> 0:26:58.920
<v Speaker 1>before that June fifth call back to Sean.

0:27:00.119 --> 0:27:02.000
<v Speaker 5>She doesn't want to do it, but I think this

0:27:02.200 --> 0:27:05.480
<v Speaker 5>case and the prospect of going to jail because she

0:27:05.560 --> 0:27:11.199
<v Speaker 5>has that warrant pending, I think that is what you know,

0:27:11.520 --> 0:27:16.480
<v Speaker 5>motivated her finally to follow through with the phone call

0:27:16.640 --> 0:27:20.120
<v Speaker 5>to Byron. And now you know she's in over her head.

0:27:20.160 --> 0:27:22.760
<v Speaker 5>She can't back out of this. She can't. There's no

0:27:22.800 --> 0:27:23.399
<v Speaker 5>way to do it.

0:27:23.800 --> 0:27:27.800
<v Speaker 4>Another thing to point out Leah is that in that

0:27:28.000 --> 0:27:33.119
<v Speaker 4>report that Sergeant Kilgore wrote from December of two thousand,

0:27:33.240 --> 0:27:35.199
<v Speaker 4>when he installs the tape recorder, the last thing he

0:27:35.240 --> 0:27:40.960
<v Speaker 4>writes is assistant prosecutor Assistant Prosecuting Attorney Amy McGowan told

0:27:41.000 --> 0:27:44.520
<v Speaker 4>me to give her phone number and her pager number,

0:27:44.840 --> 0:27:48.159
<v Speaker 4>and so that so Kelly has the prosecutor, the Jackson

0:27:48.160 --> 0:27:51.200
<v Speaker 4>County Prosecutor, one of the top deputies in Jackson County

0:27:51.200 --> 0:27:55.000
<v Speaker 4>prosecutor's contact info and then she gets picked up in

0:27:55.119 --> 0:27:57.840
<v Speaker 4>Jackson County on this warrant. Who is she going to

0:27:57.920 --> 0:28:01.320
<v Speaker 4>maybe call to get some help out of that situation?

0:28:01.720 --> 0:28:04.719
<v Speaker 4>You know, we believe that there's it's very plausible that

0:28:04.800 --> 0:28:07.720
<v Speaker 4>she called Amy McGowan and said, I'm in trouble and

0:28:07.760 --> 0:28:10.760
<v Speaker 4>I need help, and they said, okay, well we can

0:28:10.800 --> 0:28:12.760
<v Speaker 4>help you with this. But here's what you're going to

0:28:12.840 --> 0:28:15.440
<v Speaker 4>need to start playing ballbat her with us, right.

0:28:15.480 --> 0:28:17.560
<v Speaker 2>But but let me just let me jump in real quick.

0:28:18.480 --> 0:28:21.159
<v Speaker 1>We don't know that to be true, and now we

0:28:21.200 --> 0:28:24.280
<v Speaker 1>don't know. We know one there's another thing we don't

0:28:24.320 --> 0:28:26.760
<v Speaker 1>know to be true, and that's that she actually was

0:28:26.800 --> 0:28:29.320
<v Speaker 1>sentenced to forty eight hours of shockjail time in two

0:28:29.359 --> 0:28:29.959
<v Speaker 1>years probation.

0:28:30.440 --> 0:28:32.560
<v Speaker 4>That is, we don't know. We don't know what that is.

0:28:32.560 --> 0:28:33.199
<v Speaker 4>So we don't know that.

0:28:33.640 --> 0:28:34.960
<v Speaker 2>We don't actually know that there was.

0:28:34.960 --> 0:28:38.120
<v Speaker 4>Any bigger's We don't have to prove that, I know, but.

0:28:38.080 --> 0:28:40.600
<v Speaker 1>We but we've put that forth like we have said

0:28:40.600 --> 0:28:43.160
<v Speaker 1>that in the podcast. You guys have talked about that

0:28:43.160 --> 0:28:46.000
<v Speaker 1>that you you allege that there was some bigger trouble

0:28:46.000 --> 0:28:47.600
<v Speaker 1>that she was in that she had to get out of.

0:28:47.960 --> 0:28:51.240
<v Speaker 1>And I don't think that that is have been I

0:28:51.280 --> 0:28:53.480
<v Speaker 1>don't think that's been proven. I don't think that even

0:28:53.520 --> 0:28:56.360
<v Speaker 1>that her sentence, that sentence of forty eight hours of

0:28:56.400 --> 0:28:59.760
<v Speaker 1>shockjail time in two years probation has been proven. And

0:28:59.760 --> 0:29:02.120
<v Speaker 1>the thing I want to say in my email to

0:29:02.160 --> 0:29:05.640
<v Speaker 1>the Prosecutor's office, I also ask about this allegation that

0:29:05.840 --> 0:29:08.960
<v Speaker 1>after Kelly was picked up on the warrant, she called

0:29:09.000 --> 0:29:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Amy McGowan, who helped her in exchange for Kelly getting

0:29:12.560 --> 0:29:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Byron on the phone in a recorded confession.

0:29:15.760 --> 0:29:17.520
<v Speaker 3>But here's another question.

0:29:18.160 --> 0:29:22.600
<v Speaker 1>If Amy McGowan intervened, and that is a mighty big if,

0:29:23.120 --> 0:29:26.120
<v Speaker 1>why would that forty eight hours of shot, jail time

0:29:26.240 --> 0:29:30.360
<v Speaker 1>and two years probation ever be entered into the docket.

0:29:30.880 --> 0:29:35.520
<v Speaker 1>If something sneaky and nefarius went on, one would imagine

0:29:35.640 --> 0:29:40.800
<v Speaker 1>there would be enormous attention given to covering all tracks.

0:29:41.360 --> 0:29:44.440
<v Speaker 3>Okay, back to our interview, and then one.

0:29:44.360 --> 0:29:47.360
<v Speaker 1>Other thing I want to say, Sean, like, yes, Kelly

0:29:47.400 --> 0:29:52.440
<v Speaker 1>came forward and first said to her dad Byron, then

0:29:53.040 --> 0:29:57.400
<v Speaker 1>to the counselor said justin. It was her mom who

0:29:57.480 --> 0:30:00.760
<v Speaker 1>actually said no, no, no, Kelly told your dad. It

0:30:00.800 --> 0:30:03.600
<v Speaker 1>was Byron. It was her mom who called her out

0:30:03.680 --> 0:30:06.520
<v Speaker 1>and said, no, you tell her you know this is

0:30:06.520 --> 0:30:09.080
<v Speaker 1>what you told your dad. So yes, she flip flops,

0:30:09.080 --> 0:30:13.080
<v Speaker 1>but her mom makes her change her story back to Byron.

0:30:13.160 --> 0:30:16.080
<v Speaker 2>It wasn't like she did it on her own. Okay, Sorry,

0:30:16.120 --> 0:30:16.960
<v Speaker 2>what were you going to say.

0:30:16.800 --> 0:30:19.840
<v Speaker 4>Brian in response to that, Well, I don't know. I mean,

0:30:20.200 --> 0:30:25.240
<v Speaker 4>obviously the lies of Kelly's lies. We all have different theories, right.

0:30:25.440 --> 0:30:28.920
<v Speaker 4>I think that she was just a troubled kid trying

0:30:28.920 --> 0:30:31.320
<v Speaker 4>to get either back in with her parents and that's

0:30:31.360 --> 0:30:35.000
<v Speaker 4>what started this ball rolling, or that this was just

0:30:35.040 --> 0:30:36.840
<v Speaker 4>a lie that spun out of control.

0:30:36.960 --> 0:30:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:30:37.240 --> 0:30:42.880
<v Speaker 4>She her story, everything she says, there's inconsistencies, not just

0:30:42.920 --> 0:30:48.560
<v Speaker 4>across statements after she comes forward, but even within single

0:30:48.600 --> 0:30:52.000
<v Speaker 4>interviews there's inconsistencies. Even with what she was saying to you.

0:30:52.680 --> 0:30:56.160
<v Speaker 4>There's inconsistencies right all this time. Oh, she just wanted

0:30:56.160 --> 0:30:58.160
<v Speaker 4>to come forward. If only somebody had just been mean

0:30:58.240 --> 0:30:59.720
<v Speaker 4>to me in one of these interviews, I would have

0:30:59.720 --> 0:31:03.200
<v Speaker 4>told you truth. But then she says I wanted to

0:31:03.240 --> 0:31:06.640
<v Speaker 4>come forward. But that's not even then she didn't come forward.

0:31:07.560 --> 0:31:11.160
<v Speaker 4>They seemed to after she's in rehab, detoxing, and who knows,

0:31:11.240 --> 0:31:13.240
<v Speaker 4>we don't even know how long she was in rehab

0:31:13.280 --> 0:31:19.000
<v Speaker 4>before this whole maggy thing allegedly happened. But she says that, well,

0:31:19.080 --> 0:31:21.360
<v Speaker 4>I tried to say that it was justin or that

0:31:21.720 --> 0:31:23.880
<v Speaker 4>it was some other thing, and then her mom drags

0:31:23.920 --> 0:31:26.000
<v Speaker 4>out another lie out of her. I don't know it

0:31:26.120 --> 0:31:28.280
<v Speaker 4>just none of it makes sense. Did she want to

0:31:28.320 --> 0:31:31.080
<v Speaker 4>come forward or did she not come because at no

0:31:31.200 --> 0:31:34.600
<v Speaker 4>point in this does she do anything voluntarily.

0:31:35.120 --> 0:31:38.160
<v Speaker 6>No, And I still think that to call her, I mean,

0:31:38.200 --> 0:31:40.800
<v Speaker 6>she said that we characterized her as a drug kingpin,

0:31:40.880 --> 0:31:44.720
<v Speaker 6>and I don't recall ever even saying anything like that.

0:31:44.920 --> 0:31:48.720
<v Speaker 6>I mean, that's that's not the theory that she was

0:31:48.720 --> 0:31:51.920
<v Speaker 6>in trouble for something bigger. We've known for a long

0:31:52.000 --> 0:31:54.720
<v Speaker 6>time that it was a littering charge, and that's all

0:31:54.760 --> 0:31:57.280
<v Speaker 6>it has to be, is a littering charge. She doesn't

0:31:57.320 --> 0:31:59.720
<v Speaker 6>have to have, you know, drugs on her or be

0:31:59.760 --> 0:32:02.800
<v Speaker 6>a And that's not our theory. Our theory is that

0:32:04.000 --> 0:32:07.719
<v Speaker 6>she continues to use and she's connected to the prosecution.

0:32:07.920 --> 0:32:11.680
<v Speaker 6>Now she's on probation and she gets arrested, and I

0:32:11.760 --> 0:32:13.880
<v Speaker 6>don't believe that she was arrested just for having a

0:32:13.880 --> 0:32:18.200
<v Speaker 6>headlight out. I don't believe that. I would love to

0:32:18.200 --> 0:32:20.000
<v Speaker 6>get those records and we're actually trying to.

0:32:19.960 --> 0:32:22.400
<v Speaker 4>Tell where's her, where's her proof that she was that

0:32:22.480 --> 0:32:24.840
<v Speaker 4>she was arrested for a broken headline?

0:32:24.920 --> 0:32:26.600
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I don't. I don't believe that for a second.

0:32:27.280 --> 0:32:29.400
<v Speaker 6>I think that she's on probation and she gets arrested

0:32:29.400 --> 0:32:31.360
<v Speaker 6>for drugs and she realizes that she's going to have

0:32:31.360 --> 0:32:35.080
<v Speaker 6>to do backup time, and then the prosecutor steps in

0:32:35.120 --> 0:32:37.360
<v Speaker 6>to help her out. I still think that that's the case,

0:32:37.600 --> 0:32:41.440
<v Speaker 6>and I have nothing, except for killing off its word

0:32:42.440 --> 0:32:43.680
<v Speaker 6>that that's not the case.

0:32:44.040 --> 0:32:47.760
<v Speaker 2>I mean, hold on one second.

0:32:48.240 --> 0:32:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Sorry to trumpt you, but to be fair, Quinn, you

0:32:51.000 --> 0:32:53.640
<v Speaker 1>guys did say that you believed that she might have

0:32:53.720 --> 0:32:56.120
<v Speaker 1>been involved in some bigger drug thing.

0:32:56.280 --> 0:32:59.080
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's in the podcast. We did talk about that, so.

0:33:00.040 --> 0:33:03.480
<v Speaker 6>You know we speculated that it could have been the case.

0:33:03.360 --> 0:33:05.400
<v Speaker 2>Right, So I'm just saying you said, that's not what

0:33:05.440 --> 0:33:05.920
<v Speaker 2>we all.

0:33:05.960 --> 0:33:08.800
<v Speaker 4>What we ever thought, and it might have been related

0:33:08.800 --> 0:33:12.280
<v Speaker 4>to drugs, but not or something.

0:33:12.280 --> 0:33:14.800
<v Speaker 6>When I say bigger drug thing, that's not I mean,

0:33:14.800 --> 0:33:18.480
<v Speaker 6>she used the word getting caught. Sorry, I know she.

0:33:18.440 --> 0:33:21.080
<v Speaker 2>Used you she used the working pin. You've never used

0:33:21.080 --> 0:33:21.840
<v Speaker 2>the word kingpin.

0:33:22.080 --> 0:33:26.080
<v Speaker 1>But you did allege that she was involved or you

0:33:26.160 --> 0:33:28.800
<v Speaker 1>speculated that she might have been involved in some bigger

0:33:28.880 --> 0:33:30.000
<v Speaker 1>drug issue.

0:33:30.120 --> 0:33:32.480
<v Speaker 2>She used the word kingpin. You've never used that word,

0:33:32.800 --> 0:33:36.800
<v Speaker 2>but that sort of thing, I mean a person.

0:33:37.280 --> 0:33:39.880
<v Speaker 4>And as far as our quote, our theory quote that

0:33:40.000 --> 0:33:44.040
<v Speaker 4>she's was a drug addict and a compulsive liar, that

0:33:44.120 --> 0:33:47.000
<v Speaker 4>wasn't our theory. That comes straight out of her mom's mouth.

0:33:47.880 --> 0:33:50.560
<v Speaker 1>I think what Brian is referring to are a couple

0:33:50.560 --> 0:33:54.320
<v Speaker 1>of things Kelly's mom, Deborah Moffatt, has said in the past.

0:33:54.600 --> 0:33:57.760
<v Speaker 1>The first was in a report written by Sergeant Kilgore

0:33:57.960 --> 0:34:03.320
<v Speaker 1>regarding Kelly coming forward. Kilgore wrote, quote, Miss Moffatt stated

0:34:03.360 --> 0:34:06.520
<v Speaker 1>to me that this whole situation has ruined Kelly's life

0:34:06.640 --> 0:34:09.080
<v Speaker 1>by her not being able to deal with the situation.

0:34:09.960 --> 0:34:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Miss Moffittt stated to me that last spring Kelly called

0:34:13.360 --> 0:34:17.280
<v Speaker 1>her on the telephone at four hundred hours crying. Kelly

0:34:17.320 --> 0:34:21.759
<v Speaker 1>stated to Miss Moffittt, I saw Anastasia murdered. From that

0:34:21.840 --> 0:34:25.240
<v Speaker 1>point on, according to Miss Moffatt, they have been chipping

0:34:25.239 --> 0:34:28.719
<v Speaker 1>away on her, trying to get the whole story. I

0:34:28.760 --> 0:34:31.960
<v Speaker 1>asked again when Kelly first told her this, and Miss

0:34:31.960 --> 0:34:34.839
<v Speaker 1>Moffett stated that Kelly was lying to them a lot

0:34:34.920 --> 0:34:39.040
<v Speaker 1>back then, and then said I better shut up then.

0:34:39.360 --> 0:34:43.359
<v Speaker 1>On the stand, during cross examination, Deborah was asked if

0:34:43.480 --> 0:34:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Kelly would mislead her about her drug use and other topics.

0:34:47.640 --> 0:34:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Deborah said, in part quote, well, she was a drug addict.

0:34:51.840 --> 0:34:54.640
<v Speaker 1>She was lying to me because she needed money. She

0:34:54.760 --> 0:34:57.120
<v Speaker 1>wanted to come back home. I had a younger daughter

0:34:57.160 --> 0:34:59.719
<v Speaker 1>at home. She knew if she came back home she

0:34:59.719 --> 0:35:03.000
<v Speaker 1>could use drugs. I mean that's what a drug addict does.

0:35:03.520 --> 0:35:06.080
<v Speaker 1>She couldn't really tell me the truth about any of

0:35:06.120 --> 0:35:10.160
<v Speaker 1>her activity. Okay, back to Brian, you know.

0:35:10.360 --> 0:35:13.279
<v Speaker 4>That's not us saying that she says that she was

0:35:13.320 --> 0:35:16.360
<v Speaker 4>a compulsive liar and a drug addict. And the phone

0:35:16.400 --> 0:35:19.160
<v Speaker 4>call that she has with Byron, she says, nobody's gonna

0:35:19.160 --> 0:35:21.480
<v Speaker 4>believe me because I'm a crackhead, I'm a poke head,

0:35:21.480 --> 0:35:25.279
<v Speaker 4>and I'm an alcoholic. You know. I mean, that's not us,

0:35:25.000 --> 0:35:25.759
<v Speaker 4>that's her.

0:35:26.400 --> 0:35:27.279
<v Speaker 2>I hear you.

0:35:27.800 --> 0:35:28.680
<v Speaker 1>I do.

0:35:30.400 --> 0:35:32.239
<v Speaker 2>This has thrown me for a bit of a loop.

0:35:32.280 --> 0:35:33.759
<v Speaker 2>I'm just being very honest with you.

0:35:44.760 --> 0:35:45.840
<v Speaker 4>What are your concerns?

0:35:45.880 --> 0:35:48.120
<v Speaker 2>I mean I could just hear in your voice. Yeah,

0:35:48.320 --> 0:35:49.080
<v Speaker 2>I mean I'm upset.

0:35:49.120 --> 0:35:52.920
<v Speaker 1>I've been up all night and like really concerned about this, because,

0:35:52.960 --> 0:35:56.200
<v Speaker 1>first of all, I'm not thrilled with myself for not

0:35:56.280 --> 0:36:00.160
<v Speaker 1>catching that. I think that for somebody who says is

0:36:00.200 --> 0:36:02.760
<v Speaker 1>that they have told the truth and have been fighting

0:36:02.760 --> 0:36:05.000
<v Speaker 1>a credibility issue, and this has been one of the

0:36:05.000 --> 0:36:09.000
<v Speaker 1>things used against them to say, look, they're lying. And

0:36:09.400 --> 0:36:14.200
<v Speaker 1>she very quickly pointed out something that could potentially prove

0:36:14.280 --> 0:36:17.359
<v Speaker 1>that she's told the truth, that she really didn't have

0:36:17.440 --> 0:36:19.640
<v Speaker 1>this sentence. She didn't spend time in jail for this,

0:36:19.719 --> 0:36:23.680
<v Speaker 1>She wasn't on probation. That is worrisome to me, and

0:36:23.719 --> 0:36:27.600
<v Speaker 1>I understand that, like the other issue is the Brady violations,

0:36:27.600 --> 0:36:29.560
<v Speaker 1>that the prosecutors didn't hand this over.

0:36:30.160 --> 0:36:31.839
<v Speaker 2>I do understand. I understand that.

0:36:32.080 --> 0:36:34.640
<v Speaker 1>I guess I understand that you're saying that that's still

0:36:34.840 --> 0:36:36.280
<v Speaker 1>that's doesn't change.

0:36:36.680 --> 0:36:41.040
<v Speaker 5>Let me clarify the leg Stop you guys, stop, stop, stop,

0:36:41.800 --> 0:36:45.600
<v Speaker 5>just answer answer this. Let me clarify the legal issue

0:36:45.600 --> 0:36:50.040
<v Speaker 5>for you. The prosecutor is obliged to disclose if a

0:36:50.800 --> 0:36:56.600
<v Speaker 5>witness they're using has any criminal convictions for felonies or misdemeanors.

0:36:56.680 --> 0:37:00.520
<v Speaker 5>They were asked and they said none. And then in

0:37:00.600 --> 0:37:05.359
<v Speaker 5>a deposition, Kelly Moffatt was asked, do you have any

0:37:05.400 --> 0:37:10.479
<v Speaker 5>felonies or misdemeanor convictions, and she said, I've never even

0:37:10.560 --> 0:37:15.520
<v Speaker 5>been in trouble with the police, So that's a lie.

0:37:15.600 --> 0:37:18.800
<v Speaker 5>And so at the time of trial, the defense lawyer

0:37:18.920 --> 0:37:23.680
<v Speaker 5>was entitled to prove that she had been arrested and charged,

0:37:23.760 --> 0:37:26.680
<v Speaker 5>and frankly, under the circumstances, I think this was a

0:37:26.719 --> 0:37:31.160
<v Speaker 5>minor in possession charge that got dropped down to a

0:37:31.239 --> 0:37:36.440
<v Speaker 5>littering charge on a misdemeanor, because that's what the facts show,

0:37:37.160 --> 0:37:41.160
<v Speaker 5>and so that's the record. And then we have a

0:37:41.280 --> 0:37:47.080
<v Speaker 5>judgment that shows that she's facing a possibility of arrest

0:37:47.120 --> 0:37:51.040
<v Speaker 5>and there's a warrant. There's an actual warrant connected to

0:37:51.280 --> 0:37:56.279
<v Speaker 5>this case. That warrant is pending during the pendency of

0:37:56.800 --> 0:38:02.200
<v Speaker 5>Byron's charges. That gives her in incentive. And it doesn't

0:38:02.239 --> 0:38:05.680
<v Speaker 5>matter that the prosecutor played on it or used it.

0:38:06.160 --> 0:38:10.080
<v Speaker 5>What matters is that that fact out there is an

0:38:10.120 --> 0:38:17.360
<v Speaker 5>incentive for her to color her story, to cooperate with

0:38:17.480 --> 0:38:21.920
<v Speaker 5>the police, to do what's necessary to avoid being taken

0:38:21.960 --> 0:38:26.160
<v Speaker 5>into custody and go go cold turkey in a jail cell.

0:38:26.520 --> 0:38:30.239
<v Speaker 5>It's not that it's a serious charge, it's that it's

0:38:30.280 --> 0:38:33.160
<v Speaker 5>a charge that could result in her going to jail,

0:38:33.640 --> 0:38:36.359
<v Speaker 5>But it's also a lie she told in a deposition

0:38:36.480 --> 0:38:40.200
<v Speaker 5>and something the defense was entitled to use. But in

0:38:40.280 --> 0:38:43.760
<v Speaker 5>terms of the overall story here, it's not the biggest

0:38:43.800 --> 0:38:47.200
<v Speaker 5>thing that shows she's lying. It is a thing that

0:38:47.280 --> 0:38:50.759
<v Speaker 5>could have been used, not just the conviction itself, but

0:38:50.840 --> 0:38:53.920
<v Speaker 5>the fact that she lied about ever being in trouble

0:38:53.960 --> 0:38:56.480
<v Speaker 5>with the police. So that's where it all fits.

0:38:56.960 --> 0:39:00.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it seems like the warrant was issued for her

0:39:00.320 --> 0:39:02.360
<v Speaker 1>because she didn't show up to the arraignment.

0:39:03.000 --> 0:39:05.000
<v Speaker 2>So that's why the warrant was.

0:39:04.960 --> 0:39:08.400
<v Speaker 5>Issued, right, right, because the charge was pending, right, So

0:39:09.120 --> 0:39:09.759
<v Speaker 5>that's number one.

0:39:09.800 --> 0:39:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Number two, we don't know that there was a bigger

0:39:12.280 --> 0:39:15.719
<v Speaker 1>charge or anything like possession. We don't know that to

0:39:15.800 --> 0:39:18.279
<v Speaker 1>be the case, right, And my whole thing is like,

0:39:18.680 --> 0:39:21.920
<v Speaker 1>now that we've seen this clerical error on the docket,

0:39:22.920 --> 0:39:26.120
<v Speaker 1>what some of what was used to say Kelly might

0:39:26.200 --> 0:39:29.720
<v Speaker 1>have worked with prosecutors to get out of something bigger,

0:39:29.840 --> 0:39:33.919
<v Speaker 1>something that would have resulted in two years probation, forty

0:39:33.920 --> 0:39:38.160
<v Speaker 1>eight hours shot jail time. We has been is not proven,

0:39:38.200 --> 0:39:40.160
<v Speaker 1>has not been proven. We don't know that to be

0:39:40.239 --> 0:39:43.160
<v Speaker 1>the case. So I get that the Brady violations are

0:39:43.200 --> 0:39:46.759
<v Speaker 1>still there. I'm not taking anything away from that, but

0:39:47.360 --> 0:39:51.439
<v Speaker 1>something that has been used to, you know, discredit her

0:39:51.600 --> 0:39:54.120
<v Speaker 1>and make it seem like she and allude to the

0:39:54.160 --> 0:39:56.880
<v Speaker 1>fact that she might have worked with prosecutors. I don't

0:39:56.920 --> 0:39:59.640
<v Speaker 1>think that there there's I don't think the facts are

0:39:59.680 --> 0:40:02.799
<v Speaker 1>there right now. I cannot we cannot prove that she

0:40:02.920 --> 0:40:07.920
<v Speaker 1>was actually sentenced to that time and that probation. If

0:40:07.960 --> 0:40:12.080
<v Speaker 1>you can find something that actually proves that that happened,

0:40:12.120 --> 0:40:15.319
<v Speaker 1>then that's something different. But right now, with that clerical error,

0:40:15.360 --> 0:40:17.400
<v Speaker 1>the whole that whole thing could be a clerical error

0:40:17.760 --> 0:40:20.480
<v Speaker 1>because it says under other pages the only sentence was

0:40:20.520 --> 0:40:21.000
<v Speaker 1>the fine.

0:40:21.480 --> 0:40:22.399
<v Speaker 4>I would just like to.

0:40:22.320 --> 0:40:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Say that the sheriff looked at the same court records

0:40:25.280 --> 0:40:27.840
<v Speaker 1>that we're all looking at and came up with the

0:40:27.880 --> 0:40:30.839
<v Speaker 1>same conclusion that that's what she was sentenced to. Yeah,

0:40:30.880 --> 0:40:34.640
<v Speaker 1>but if the court record, the court docket is is erroneous,

0:40:34.680 --> 0:40:37.440
<v Speaker 1>if it's false and they're reading he was reading the

0:40:37.480 --> 0:40:39.640
<v Speaker 1>same or she was reading the same thing that we're

0:40:39.640 --> 0:40:42.359
<v Speaker 1>reading from right and assuming the same thing, and he

0:40:42.400 --> 0:40:46.239
<v Speaker 1>came to the same conclusion that that case was not

0:40:46.320 --> 0:40:47.640
<v Speaker 1>connected with Kelly's case.

0:40:48.000 --> 0:40:49.520
<v Speaker 2>But he didn't say that in that email.

0:40:49.560 --> 0:40:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Now he says that it looks like she was sentenced

0:40:52.480 --> 0:40:57.719
<v Speaker 1>to show time and probation say anything about another case. Right,

0:40:57.920 --> 0:41:00.200
<v Speaker 1>he's saying, I read the court record that you read,

0:41:00.440 --> 0:41:02.000
<v Speaker 1>and this is the conclusion.

0:41:01.560 --> 0:41:04.319
<v Speaker 2>I came up with. Right, But we can't.

0:41:04.320 --> 0:41:06.839
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's not proof of anything because we're as

0:41:06.840 --> 0:41:10.759
<v Speaker 1>we're understanding, like there are falsehoods. There's like you know,

0:41:10.800 --> 0:41:13.319
<v Speaker 1>there are clerical errors on them. I know that that's

0:41:13.320 --> 0:41:16.080
<v Speaker 1>what you want in order to feel good about this,

0:41:16.880 --> 0:41:20.360
<v Speaker 1>because I get as a journalist, you want to you

0:41:20.400 --> 0:41:23.919
<v Speaker 1>want the proof before you start accusing people or giving

0:41:23.960 --> 0:41:27.000
<v Speaker 1>people a platform to do damage to some I understand

0:41:27.040 --> 0:41:27.879
<v Speaker 1>where you're coming from.

0:41:27.920 --> 0:41:28.839
<v Speaker 4>I do, I get it.

0:41:29.200 --> 0:41:30.000
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I am.

0:41:30.000 --> 0:41:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Just trying to be fair to both sides, and when

0:41:33.200 --> 0:41:35.840
<v Speaker 1>something is brought to me, I have to go to

0:41:35.920 --> 0:41:38.319
<v Speaker 1>the other side and ask about it.

0:41:38.880 --> 0:41:44.800
<v Speaker 2>I mean I was stunned last night. I mean stunned.

0:41:45.200 --> 0:41:48.839
<v Speaker 1>And you know, does she bring evidence of anything out?

0:41:48.960 --> 0:41:52.319
<v Speaker 1>Like all the evidence that she has to prove her innocence, we.

0:41:52.280 --> 0:41:53.840
<v Speaker 2>Would love to see.

0:41:54.160 --> 0:41:56.360
<v Speaker 1>So if there's anything else that she has, I have

0:41:56.520 --> 0:41:59.000
<v Speaker 1>searched this file inside it now and I have looked

0:41:59.520 --> 0:42:03.319
<v Speaker 1>for things that can corroborate her story, and so if

0:42:03.320 --> 0:42:06.120
<v Speaker 1>there's anything else, we'd love to know about it. She

0:42:06.440 --> 0:42:10.439
<v Speaker 1>just screen grabbed the sentence for me and it said,

0:42:10.600 --> 0:42:12.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, fourteen dollars and ninety five cents.

0:42:12.680 --> 0:42:13.600
<v Speaker 4>And that's all that.

0:42:13.600 --> 0:42:16.440
<v Speaker 1>That's the only evidence that she's offered you to corroborate

0:42:16.480 --> 0:42:18.880
<v Speaker 1>any of her I mean, is there Yeah, because she

0:42:18.880 --> 0:42:21.560
<v Speaker 1>says there's nothing else to prove, that's what she I means,

0:42:21.560 --> 0:42:24.759
<v Speaker 1>She's like, I didn't do the time. That wasn't my sentence. Oh,

0:42:24.800 --> 0:42:27.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm just talking about her story in general. I mean,

0:42:27.200 --> 0:42:29.399
<v Speaker 1>it seems like she's really honed in on this.

0:42:30.040 --> 0:42:31.439
<v Speaker 2>No, this is this has been from.

0:42:31.440 --> 0:42:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Yesterday, last night to this morning, you know, I mean,

0:42:35.280 --> 0:42:37.160
<v Speaker 1>this is what we're focused on, what I'm focused on

0:42:37.239 --> 0:42:41.000
<v Speaker 1>right now. And yes there are questions about other things

0:42:41.080 --> 0:42:43.480
<v Speaker 1>for sure, but this is this is the focus for

0:42:43.560 --> 0:42:43.960
<v Speaker 1>right now.

0:42:44.600 --> 0:42:46.759
<v Speaker 5>Well, it's what do you compare with I've never been

0:42:46.760 --> 0:42:49.919
<v Speaker 5>in trouble with the police. You know, we can show

0:42:49.960 --> 0:42:51.040
<v Speaker 5>that to a lie.

0:42:51.280 --> 0:42:53.160
<v Speaker 2>I hear you, Sean, I really do.

0:42:53.880 --> 0:42:56.840
<v Speaker 1>I also can understand and this is where maybe the

0:42:56.920 --> 0:42:59.399
<v Speaker 1>Libra and me can get me in trouble sometimes because

0:42:59.400 --> 0:43:02.440
<v Speaker 1>I can see side so very much. But I can

0:43:02.520 --> 0:43:08.080
<v Speaker 1>see a young kid who's scared and is like, doesn't

0:43:08.160 --> 0:43:10.960
<v Speaker 1>think a littering charge and a fine of fourteen dollars

0:43:10.960 --> 0:43:14.440
<v Speaker 1>and ninety five cents is really getting in trouble with police.

0:43:14.520 --> 0:43:16.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure she was surrounded by a lot of people

0:43:16.760 --> 0:43:19.320
<v Speaker 1>in that drug world who were getting in real trouble

0:43:19.480 --> 0:43:22.919
<v Speaker 1>with the police, and so she didn't actually consider it.

0:43:24.000 --> 0:43:27.520
<v Speaker 4>So she said it go ahead. Sorry, I apologize, No,

0:43:27.560 --> 0:43:27.759
<v Speaker 4>I was.

0:43:27.719 --> 0:43:29.680
<v Speaker 1>Just gonna say, like what she said in her deposition,

0:43:30.360 --> 0:43:32.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, was she hiding something?

0:43:32.920 --> 0:43:33.440
<v Speaker 4>I don't know.

0:43:33.520 --> 0:43:35.880
<v Speaker 1>I kind of understand her being like, it wasn't that

0:43:35.880 --> 0:43:37.879
<v Speaker 1>big of a deal. I paid less than fifteen bucks

0:43:37.920 --> 0:43:41.000
<v Speaker 1>to get out of it. If anything, to your point,

0:43:41.080 --> 0:43:43.520
<v Speaker 1>it's the prosecutors who should have turned that over.

0:43:44.200 --> 0:43:46.640
<v Speaker 4>Her description to you did not sound like it wasn't

0:43:46.680 --> 0:43:50.440
<v Speaker 4>that big of a deal, she says. She vividly remembers

0:43:50.480 --> 0:43:54.279
<v Speaker 4>now getting arrested by the Least Summit Police Department and

0:43:54.520 --> 0:43:58.759
<v Speaker 4>extradited to Cooper County. And so you're saying that.

0:43:58.680 --> 0:44:01.000
<v Speaker 2>You can, but she doesn't remember going to jail or

0:44:01.000 --> 0:44:01.800
<v Speaker 2>being on probation.

0:44:02.120 --> 0:44:04.400
<v Speaker 4>But she would have gone to jail if she tested

0:44:04.560 --> 0:44:06.879
<v Speaker 4>and got extradited to Cooper County and by.

0:44:06.880 --> 0:44:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Going to jail and being sentenced to jail or two

0:44:09.680 --> 0:44:10.320
<v Speaker 1>different things.

0:44:10.400 --> 0:44:14.080
<v Speaker 4>Right, Yes, but not with what you're talking about. You're

0:44:14.120 --> 0:44:17.080
<v Speaker 4>saying you believe what Kelly's saying that she would. Well,

0:44:17.160 --> 0:44:21.040
<v Speaker 4>I totally slipped my mind when I'm in a deposition

0:44:21.160 --> 0:44:25.360
<v Speaker 4>on a murder case when Byron's defense lawyer says, have

0:44:25.520 --> 0:44:28.799
<v Speaker 4>you ever been convicted of a class of a misdemeanor

0:44:28.920 --> 0:44:32.080
<v Speaker 4>or felony in state or federal court? And it just

0:44:32.120 --> 0:44:34.120
<v Speaker 4>slips her mind because in her mind this was just

0:44:34.200 --> 0:44:37.080
<v Speaker 4>some little ticket. No, it could not have been some

0:44:37.200 --> 0:44:39.360
<v Speaker 4>little ticket in her mind at that time based on

0:44:39.440 --> 0:44:42.480
<v Speaker 4>what she told you, she got picked up on a

0:44:42.600 --> 0:44:47.800
<v Speaker 4>warrant and got transferred from Jackson County to two hours

0:44:47.840 --> 0:44:52.799
<v Speaker 4>away to Cooper County to be arraigned. Right, And we

0:44:53.040 --> 0:44:55.279
<v Speaker 4>have no idea, and she hasn't said yet. I'm sure

0:44:55.280 --> 0:44:58.640
<v Speaker 4>she'll come up with a great story on what happened

0:44:59.040 --> 0:45:01.880
<v Speaker 4>in between getting ac by the least Summit Police Department

0:45:02.320 --> 0:45:05.280
<v Speaker 4>and showing up in court in Cooper County to plead guilty.

0:45:05.560 --> 0:45:08.800
<v Speaker 4>But there's simply no way that that would not have

0:45:08.960 --> 0:45:10.120
<v Speaker 4>been a big deal to her.

0:45:10.680 --> 0:45:14.719
<v Speaker 6>This is handcuff She's being transported in a police vehicle

0:45:15.160 --> 0:45:19.320
<v Speaker 6>in handcuffs, if that's not being in trouble with the police.

0:45:19.840 --> 0:45:22.239
<v Speaker 4>But I mean, I guess what else can I don't

0:45:22.280 --> 0:45:24.279
<v Speaker 4>know what else we could say about that. That's you know,

0:45:24.960 --> 0:45:25.759
<v Speaker 4>it is what it is.

0:45:26.280 --> 0:45:28.359
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And I think she said she spent a little

0:45:28.400 --> 0:45:31.560
<v Speaker 1>bit of time there until she was bailed out or whatever.

0:45:31.840 --> 0:45:36.239
<v Speaker 1>But you know, yeah, I mean, I there's just I

0:45:36.280 --> 0:45:40.640
<v Speaker 1>needed to ask you about it. If you can find

0:45:40.680 --> 0:45:45.160
<v Speaker 1>anything that says that she actually was on probation or

0:45:46.600 --> 0:45:49.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, spent forty eight hours in jail, obviously I

0:45:49.400 --> 0:45:52.680
<v Speaker 1>would love to see it. As of right now, I

0:45:52.719 --> 0:45:55.320
<v Speaker 1>can't say that I believe that that happened.

0:45:56.040 --> 0:45:57.720
<v Speaker 2>And I think that this clerical error.

0:45:58.600 --> 0:46:01.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, well we know that, but there's a clerical error.

0:46:01.440 --> 0:46:04.080
<v Speaker 4>We don't know the extent of it. And it's our

0:46:04.200 --> 0:46:08.759
<v Speaker 4>job to assume that. When there's facts that could go

0:46:08.840 --> 0:46:10.680
<v Speaker 4>either way, we have to look at them and what

0:46:11.760 --> 0:46:14.040
<v Speaker 4>helps our client, what's in the best interests of our client.

0:46:14.560 --> 0:46:17.879
<v Speaker 4>This clerical error has somebody else's case number on there,

0:46:17.920 --> 0:46:22.520
<v Speaker 4>but it says consecutive with that case number, so in

0:46:22.560 --> 0:46:25.960
<v Speaker 4>our mind and I'm reading this, it's what I just

0:46:26.000 --> 0:46:27.919
<v Speaker 4>sent you. I just emailed it to you. I thought

0:46:27.960 --> 0:46:29.759
<v Speaker 4>you would have already had it, and maybe you do.

0:46:29.880 --> 0:46:33.600
<v Speaker 4>But that nothing about this rules out that she still

0:46:33.640 --> 0:46:39.319
<v Speaker 4>got thirty days a suspended execution, a suspended execution of

0:46:39.360 --> 0:46:41.880
<v Speaker 4>thirty days with two days shock time in two years probation.

0:46:42.280 --> 0:46:44.319
<v Speaker 4>We still have evidence of that. It's what I just

0:46:44.360 --> 0:46:47.239
<v Speaker 4>sent you. Maybe this other person also got that same

0:46:47.280 --> 0:46:50.359
<v Speaker 4>sentence for a different class a misdemeanor, but that does

0:46:50.400 --> 0:46:53.080
<v Speaker 4>not disprove that Kelly MafA did it. And even if

0:46:53.080 --> 0:46:56.320
<v Speaker 4>it did again, that's not the central issue. The central

0:46:56.360 --> 0:46:59.920
<v Speaker 4>issue is she was convicted of a misdemeanor, and she

0:47:00.120 --> 0:47:03.840
<v Speaker 4>lied about it, and the prosecutor's office failed to disclose.

0:47:03.400 --> 0:47:06.320
<v Speaker 5>It, and we couldn't find a relationship between the two cases,

0:47:07.160 --> 0:47:10.480
<v Speaker 5>and so, you know, looking at it when we drilled

0:47:10.480 --> 0:47:14.920
<v Speaker 5>down into it, it's a mistake by one number in

0:47:14.960 --> 0:47:19.560
<v Speaker 5>that notation that this sentence is consecutive to that other sentence.

0:47:19.840 --> 0:47:23.160
<v Speaker 5>The other sentence belongs to somebody else, but this sentence

0:47:23.239 --> 0:47:23.840
<v Speaker 5>is Kelly's.

0:47:24.840 --> 0:47:27.520
<v Speaker 1>For the record, the two case numbers are not even

0:47:27.719 --> 0:47:33.240
<v Speaker 1>remotely alike. Each are twelve digits, which include both letters

0:47:33.239 --> 0:47:36.279
<v Speaker 1>and numbers, but These two are not off by a

0:47:36.360 --> 0:47:41.520
<v Speaker 1>digit or two. They are radically different. It seems the

0:47:41.560 --> 0:47:44.840
<v Speaker 1>only thing Kelly and this Brendan person have in common

0:47:45.360 --> 0:47:49.160
<v Speaker 1>is that two separate events happen in their cases on

0:47:49.239 --> 0:47:52.480
<v Speaker 1>the same day. April third, two thousand and one.

0:47:53.440 --> 0:47:56.120
<v Speaker 2>Did you ever look at Angie's.

0:47:57.080 --> 0:48:00.400
<v Speaker 1>Angie Giannino is the friend Kelly was with when they

0:48:00.400 --> 0:48:03.680
<v Speaker 1>were pulled over in Cooper County. You heard from Angie

0:48:04.080 --> 0:48:06.960
<v Speaker 1>in episode eleven, And what did you find.

0:48:06.680 --> 0:48:07.880
<v Speaker 2>From Angie's docket?

0:48:08.560 --> 0:48:12.200
<v Speaker 4>We were just looking at that again recently. Let me see,

0:48:12.520 --> 0:48:15.040
<v Speaker 4>let me find some notes here. I know for a

0:48:15.080 --> 0:48:19.160
<v Speaker 4>fact that she showed up to her hearing. She did

0:48:19.160 --> 0:48:22.040
<v Speaker 4>not have a warrant issue for her arrest, and she

0:48:22.239 --> 0:48:25.640
<v Speaker 4>was fined two hundred and fifty dollars, but her charge

0:48:25.920 --> 0:48:30.520
<v Speaker 4>was a Class B missdemeanor for exceeding the speed limit

0:48:30.520 --> 0:48:31.959
<v Speaker 4>of twenty miles an hour or more.

0:48:32.480 --> 0:48:35.720
<v Speaker 6>Because she successfully paid the fine and completed her probation,

0:48:36.239 --> 0:48:39.080
<v Speaker 6>that won't be publicly available on case neet, but she

0:48:39.120 --> 0:48:40.239
<v Speaker 6>had to get that a different.

0:48:40.000 --> 0:48:42.400
<v Speaker 4>Way, and she well, this was on case net what

0:48:42.440 --> 0:48:45.560
<v Speaker 4>I just said. Let's see, so she was That was

0:48:45.960 --> 0:48:49.560
<v Speaker 4>June sixth of two thousand and that's the date that

0:48:49.680 --> 0:48:52.520
<v Speaker 4>Kelly was also supposed to show up, and she skipped,

0:48:52.760 --> 0:48:54.560
<v Speaker 4>and then it was a couple weeks after that that

0:48:54.600 --> 0:48:56.240
<v Speaker 4>the warrant was issued for her arrest.

0:48:56.560 --> 0:48:58.799
<v Speaker 1>And there's also an error on the date that they

0:48:58.800 --> 0:49:02.000
<v Speaker 1>were arrested. I thought, in case at one point it

0:49:02.080 --> 0:49:03.879
<v Speaker 1>said five on May fifteenth, but.

0:49:03.840 --> 0:49:05.400
<v Speaker 2>It's actually April fifteenth.

0:49:06.040 --> 0:49:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Why on this page does it only say the finest

0:49:10.640 --> 0:49:14.480
<v Speaker 1>thirteen dollars. The sentence is fourteen dollars and ninety five cents.

0:49:15.040 --> 0:49:16.880
<v Speaker 4>I don't know. I mean, that's kind of one of

0:49:16.880 --> 0:49:19.120
<v Speaker 4>those things that we're like, yeah, we know that this

0:49:19.200 --> 0:49:24.440
<v Speaker 4>is an imperfect record, and that's why we've been waiting

0:49:24.520 --> 0:49:27.600
<v Speaker 4>to not waiting, but trying to. You know, we've sent

0:49:27.680 --> 0:49:32.520
<v Speaker 4>record requests to everybody. Nicole when we after we first

0:49:32.520 --> 0:49:36.080
<v Speaker 4>found out about this issue, drove to Cooper County and

0:49:36.160 --> 0:49:39.920
<v Speaker 4>went and looked looked for it physically, for records that

0:49:39.960 --> 0:49:42.799
<v Speaker 4>we could find, you know, I mean, that's this is

0:49:42.800 --> 0:49:45.800
<v Speaker 4>one of the problems you routinely run into with these

0:49:46.040 --> 0:49:49.680
<v Speaker 4>kinds of cases, is that once it's been decades, you know,

0:49:49.920 --> 0:49:54.160
<v Speaker 4>you're you're practically doing what's the word, I'm looking for

0:49:54.600 --> 0:50:00.560
<v Speaker 4>archaeological examination, right, it's so I'm glad that Kelly able to,

0:50:00.840 --> 0:50:03.719
<v Speaker 4>you know, say no, that that didn't happen. But at

0:50:03.719 --> 0:50:06.120
<v Speaker 4>this point we still only have Kelly's word for it.

0:50:06.200 --> 0:50:09.800
<v Speaker 4>And again, let's let's assume she's right and for some reason,

0:50:09.840 --> 0:50:14.239
<v Speaker 4>her friend gets on a lower misdemeanor charge. Her friend

0:50:14.280 --> 0:50:17.680
<v Speaker 4>gets two hundred and fifty dollars, but after having to

0:50:17.760 --> 0:50:20.200
<v Speaker 4>issue a warrant that she's picked up on, she was

0:50:20.239 --> 0:50:24.120
<v Speaker 4>only fined fifteen dollars. It's I don't know, it's just

0:50:24.120 --> 0:50:27.400
<v Speaker 4>in my experience. There's we still got a lot of questions.

0:50:27.680 --> 0:50:30.120
<v Speaker 1>It is interesting that Angie got a two hundred and

0:50:30.160 --> 0:50:33.720
<v Speaker 1>fifty dollars fine and Kelly got only a fourteen dollars

0:50:33.800 --> 0:50:37.359
<v Speaker 1>and ninety five cent fine. But how much would a

0:50:37.440 --> 0:50:42.080
<v Speaker 1>minor be fined for a littering charge? Anything else anybody

0:50:42.120 --> 0:50:44.759
<v Speaker 1>wants to say before we I would just like to

0:50:44.760 --> 0:50:47.240
<v Speaker 1>say some of the stuff that Kelly said about Cooper

0:50:47.280 --> 0:50:50.280
<v Speaker 1>County and getting arrested with Angie and taking her car back,

0:50:50.400 --> 0:50:52.759
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, it's not true. I mean, Angie, we

0:50:52.840 --> 0:50:56.359
<v Speaker 1>have an affidavid from Angie Gannino that contradicts that straight up.

0:50:56.400 --> 0:51:00.880
<v Speaker 1>But I went back to Angie's affidavit, and she said

0:51:00.960 --> 0:51:04.840
<v Speaker 1>this about what happened after she and Kelly were arrested. Quote,

0:51:05.400 --> 0:51:08.080
<v Speaker 1>when we were pulled over, I was arrested and ticketed

0:51:08.160 --> 0:51:11.439
<v Speaker 1>for driving ninety miles per hour in a seventy mile

0:51:11.520 --> 0:51:15.480
<v Speaker 1>per hour zone. My vehicle was impounded and I was

0:51:15.480 --> 0:51:19.120
<v Speaker 1>taken to the Cooper County jail. Kelly was ticketed for

0:51:19.239 --> 0:51:22.040
<v Speaker 1>littering for throwing the bottle of alcohol out the window.

0:51:22.560 --> 0:51:25.040
<v Speaker 1>I do not know if she was arrested. I do

0:51:25.120 --> 0:51:28.400
<v Speaker 1>not know how she got back to Kansas City, Okay.

0:51:29.120 --> 0:51:33.680
<v Speaker 1>Kelly told me that instead of impounding Angie's car, police

0:51:33.760 --> 0:51:37.759
<v Speaker 1>gave Kelly Angie's car keys, and Kelly used Angie's car

0:51:38.120 --> 0:51:41.399
<v Speaker 1>for a couple of days. I don't want to say more,

0:51:41.440 --> 0:51:44.719
<v Speaker 1>but Kelly's not been truthful with you all the way.

0:51:46.440 --> 0:51:49.239
<v Speaker 1>But I understand where you're coming from and wanting to

0:51:50.160 --> 0:51:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Q and being worried and.

0:51:51.719 --> 0:51:55.360
<v Speaker 4>Concerned, and we appreciate being fact checked. And yeah, I

0:51:55.400 --> 0:51:59.120
<v Speaker 4>mean I think you So everything about our case still stands.

0:52:00.160 --> 0:52:06.040
<v Speaker 4>Is arrested at least once, uh, which she denied ever

0:52:06.080 --> 0:52:08.720
<v Speaker 4>being being in trouble with the police. She was convicted

0:52:08.760 --> 0:52:11.920
<v Speaker 4>of a Class A misdemeanor which she lied about and

0:52:11.960 --> 0:52:15.560
<v Speaker 4>which the prosecutors failed to disclose. That's the salient issue,

0:52:16.120 --> 0:52:21.480
<v Speaker 4>and discovery and uh more investigation will get to the

0:52:21.480 --> 0:52:25.840
<v Speaker 4>bottom of what exactly she was sentenced to. But if

0:52:26.239 --> 0:52:31.600
<v Speaker 4>the only evidence refuting this is Kelly Moffatt, well that's

0:52:32.680 --> 0:52:33.920
<v Speaker 4>hardly any evidence at all.

0:52:34.600 --> 0:52:36.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I guess what would it take for you

0:52:36.760 --> 0:52:39.000
<v Speaker 1>to build it? And I'm not kelly spokesperson. I'm just

0:52:39.040 --> 0:52:42.160
<v Speaker 1>asking these questions. What would take? What would it take

0:52:42.200 --> 0:52:44.520
<v Speaker 1>for you to believe that Kelly in fact was not

0:52:44.719 --> 0:52:48.319
<v Speaker 1>sentenced to forty eight hours shop jail time in two

0:52:48.400 --> 0:52:49.080
<v Speaker 1>years probation.

0:52:50.400 --> 0:52:54.480
<v Speaker 4>I would probably say some certified record that shows that

0:52:54.480 --> 0:52:56.560
<v Speaker 4>that's all it was that or I don't know, a

0:52:56.640 --> 0:53:02.480
<v Speaker 4>cashed check or some document or or the testimony of

0:53:02.520 --> 0:53:05.800
<v Speaker 4>some other credible person other than Kelly that was there.

0:53:06.360 --> 0:53:10.560
<v Speaker 4>You know, something along those lines would would be helpful. Obviously.

0:53:10.600 --> 0:53:13.759
<v Speaker 4>You know, it's hard to sit anywhere and say, oh, well,

0:53:13.760 --> 0:53:17.200
<v Speaker 4>if this happened. You know, every time something comes up,

0:53:17.440 --> 0:53:21.239
<v Speaker 4>we're gonna have questions, and especially if it's something that

0:53:21.360 --> 0:53:25.920
<v Speaker 4>Kelly is relying on. But but yeah, I mean, I

0:53:25.920 --> 0:53:29.239
<v Speaker 4>wouldn't say we're not for our purposes. What she was

0:53:29.280 --> 0:53:33.840
<v Speaker 4>sentenced to is almost beside the point, you know. The

0:53:34.440 --> 0:53:38.040
<v Speaker 4>point is what we've already mentioned, that she was convicted,

0:53:38.080 --> 0:53:41.720
<v Speaker 4>that she was in trouble, and that she lied about it, right.

0:53:41.680 --> 0:53:45.960
<v Speaker 1>I think, I mean she was was in this morning,

0:53:46.080 --> 0:53:49.920
<v Speaker 1>still very upset about this, just so you know, very upset.

0:53:50.120 --> 0:53:53.640
<v Speaker 4>I mean that's Byron's been in prison for almost twenty

0:53:53.719 --> 0:53:56.359
<v Speaker 4>five years because of her lives. So I don't really

0:53:56.360 --> 0:53:58.920
<v Speaker 4>care if she's upset. But I'm glad you thanks for Tommins.

0:54:01.080 --> 0:54:04.080
<v Speaker 1>I think our goals and this aren't you know, they're

0:54:04.280 --> 0:54:06.480
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day. You come from a

0:54:06.520 --> 0:54:10.520
<v Speaker 1>journalist's point of view, and we're just presenting facts as.

0:54:10.360 --> 0:54:10.920
<v Speaker 4>We see them.

0:54:11.080 --> 0:54:15.239
<v Speaker 1>We may have, you know, hypotheticals. That's our job, you know,

0:54:15.320 --> 0:54:18.319
<v Speaker 1>is to try to figure out what happened. And but

0:54:19.280 --> 0:54:21.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think I'm sorry to interrupt you, Nicole.

0:54:21.760 --> 0:54:23.399
<v Speaker 2>I think the whole thing.

0:54:23.640 --> 0:54:27.560
<v Speaker 1>I think Kelly's point right now is that she's been

0:54:27.600 --> 0:54:32.440
<v Speaker 1>fighting credibility issues for a very long time and here's

0:54:32.480 --> 0:54:37.439
<v Speaker 1>an example of something that's being used, wrongfully used against her,

0:54:37.880 --> 0:54:40.560
<v Speaker 1>and she's like, I told you this didn't happen. This

0:54:40.640 --> 0:54:43.920
<v Speaker 1>is a clerical error. This, This did not happen, and

0:54:43.960 --> 0:54:46.640
<v Speaker 1>this is an example of stuff that's been used against

0:54:46.640 --> 0:54:49.360
<v Speaker 1>me to try to make me look like a liar.

0:54:49.480 --> 0:54:51.160
<v Speaker 2>And she's like, yes, I've lied in the past.

0:54:51.160 --> 0:54:54.040
<v Speaker 1>There are things that I can't remember, but I remember

0:54:54.080 --> 0:54:57.520
<v Speaker 1>the important stuff. She remembers what she said about Byron,

0:54:57.600 --> 0:54:59.280
<v Speaker 1>and she remembers what she witnessed Byron.

0:54:59.320 --> 0:55:02.120
<v Speaker 2>Do she remembers not.

0:55:02.239 --> 0:55:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Going to jail and not spending being sentenced to probation,

0:55:05.960 --> 0:55:09.839
<v Speaker 1>and you know, it's I don't know, I just.

0:55:10.440 --> 0:55:13.080
<v Speaker 4>Well, and just just to put things in context too.

0:55:13.880 --> 0:55:18.040
<v Speaker 4>What Kelly says about this is we learned about it

0:55:18.280 --> 0:55:20.920
<v Speaker 4>when we were listening to the podcast. Right, We've never

0:55:21.000 --> 0:55:23.360
<v Speaker 4>had it. We have yet to have the opportunity to

0:55:23.440 --> 0:55:26.319
<v Speaker 4>find out anything more about this, you know. And we

0:55:26.520 --> 0:55:28.480
<v Speaker 4>and when we asked Angie what she knew about it,

0:55:28.560 --> 0:55:30.560
<v Speaker 4>she said, I don't know what happened. I don't know

0:55:30.600 --> 0:55:32.719
<v Speaker 4>what happened after it. I don't know what happened with

0:55:32.800 --> 0:55:35.879
<v Speaker 4>Kelly's thing, Right, She said that to me too, Yeah,

0:55:35.880 --> 0:55:38.319
<v Speaker 4>and so and we we know for a fact though

0:55:38.480 --> 0:55:40.200
<v Speaker 4>she got a warrant, and she got picked up on

0:55:40.239 --> 0:55:43.480
<v Speaker 4>a warrant, and it seems very strange to me that

0:55:43.600 --> 0:55:47.759
<v Speaker 4>a rural county judge would issue a bench warrant, and

0:55:47.800 --> 0:55:50.239
<v Speaker 4>then once the person shows up in his courtroom on

0:55:50.239 --> 0:55:53.399
<v Speaker 4>that bench warrant on a Class A misdemeanor, he says, Oh,

0:55:53.440 --> 0:55:57.400
<v Speaker 4>never mind, I'm only going to sentence you to fifteen dollars. Fine.

0:55:58.239 --> 0:56:01.200
<v Speaker 4>I just don't that. I still have a lot of

0:56:01.280 --> 0:56:05.239
<v Speaker 4>questions about that, and just Kelly's word that that's all

0:56:05.280 --> 0:56:09.399
<v Speaker 4>that happened just doesn't to me. That's not doesn't really

0:56:09.440 --> 0:56:09.759
<v Speaker 4>move me.

0:56:12.080 --> 0:56:14.920
<v Speaker 2>All right, thank you everyone, I appreciate it.

0:56:15.160 --> 0:56:20.320
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, hey, it's still great, I hope. Yeah, we're passionate

0:56:20.360 --> 0:56:20.759
<v Speaker 4>about this.

0:56:22.280 --> 0:56:24.720
<v Speaker 2>Thanks everyone, Bye bye bye.

0:56:26.280 --> 0:56:29.080
<v Speaker 1>The next day, Brian and I speak again. One of

0:56:29.080 --> 0:56:31.480
<v Speaker 1>the things Brian says is he doesn't want me to

0:56:31.520 --> 0:56:35.680
<v Speaker 1>think the team was trying to pull one over on me. Okay,

0:56:36.280 --> 0:56:40.439
<v Speaker 1>this was supposed to be our last episode, but there's

0:56:40.480 --> 0:56:43.919
<v Speaker 1>still so much left to share, like what Byron's legal

0:56:43.960 --> 0:56:47.800
<v Speaker 1>team and Byron have to say about some of Kelly's allegations,

0:56:48.200 --> 0:56:50.120
<v Speaker 1>and what they have to say when I ask them.

0:56:50.160 --> 0:56:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Some of your questions and mine. To see photos, maps,

0:56:59.120 --> 0:57:02.480
<v Speaker 1>and documents really to this season's story. Follow the Real

0:57:02.560 --> 0:57:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Killer podcast on Instagram and at TRK podcast on TikTok.

0:57:10.920 --> 0:57:15.200
<v Speaker 1>The Real Killer is a production of AYR Media and iHeartMedia,

0:57:15.680 --> 0:57:20.480
<v Speaker 1>hosted by me Leah Rothman, Executive producers Leah Rothman and

0:57:20.520 --> 0:57:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Elisa Rosen for AYR Media. Written by Leah Rothman, Editing

0:57:26.280 --> 0:57:30.680
<v Speaker 1>and sound design by Cameron Taggi, Mixed and mastered by

0:57:30.720 --> 0:57:37.640
<v Speaker 1>Cameron Taggi, Audio engineer Justin Longerbeam studio engineer Graham Gibson,

0:57:38.480 --> 0:57:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Legal consul for AYR Media. Jonni Douglas, executive producer for iHeartMedia,

0:57:44.960 --> 0:57:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Maya Howard