1 00:00:02,720 --> 00:00:07,240 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News. 2 00:00:17,400 --> 00:00:20,320 Speaker 2: I'm Stephanie Flanders, head of Government and Economics at Bloomberg, 3 00:00:20,480 --> 00:00:23,759 Speaker 2: and this is Trumppanomics, the podcast that looks at the 4 00:00:23,800 --> 00:00:27,720 Speaker 2: economic world of Donald Trump, how he's shaping and shaking 5 00:00:27,840 --> 00:00:30,360 Speaker 2: the global economy and what on earth is going to 6 00:00:30,360 --> 00:00:35,720 Speaker 2: happen next. Well, it's the afternoon of Wednesday, the first 7 00:00:35,760 --> 00:00:38,360 Speaker 2: of April in the UK, and we're well into the 8 00:00:38,400 --> 00:00:41,880 Speaker 2: fifth week of a conflict in Iran that very few 9 00:00:41,880 --> 00:00:46,720 Speaker 2: of America's allies wanted or even now fully understand. They are, though, 10 00:00:46,960 --> 00:00:51,200 Speaker 2: dealing with the economic consequences, biggest of which being energy 11 00:00:51,240 --> 00:00:55,280 Speaker 2: prices and an Iranian stranglehold over the stretch ofform moves. 12 00:00:55,840 --> 00:00:59,360 Speaker 2: Last week, we looked at this crisis as an exercise 13 00:00:59,400 --> 00:01:02,920 Speaker 2: in economic state craft, one in which, against the odds, 14 00:01:03,200 --> 00:01:06,560 Speaker 2: Iran seemed to be doing rather well. In this episode, 15 00:01:06,800 --> 00:01:09,759 Speaker 2: we're looking east to consider the view of the crisis 16 00:01:09,800 --> 00:01:14,440 Speaker 2: from Beijing. Like many, the Chinese government would almost certainly 17 00:01:14,480 --> 00:01:18,560 Speaker 2: prefer the conflict hadn't started. Brings instability to a region 18 00:01:18,560 --> 00:01:22,920 Speaker 2: that's increasingly important and inflicts high oil and gas prices 19 00:01:22,959 --> 00:01:27,080 Speaker 2: on an economy that relies on significant energy imports in 20 00:01:27,120 --> 00:01:30,200 Speaker 2: a context of a still fragile domestic recovery. And yet, 21 00:01:30,920 --> 00:01:32,960 Speaker 2: and yet, the fact that Donald Trump is once again 22 00:01:33,000 --> 00:01:37,080 Speaker 2: demonstrating to the world his tendency to inflict wildly unpredictable 23 00:01:37,080 --> 00:01:41,600 Speaker 2: and damaging swings in policy on his allies surely also 24 00:01:41,680 --> 00:01:46,880 Speaker 2: provides something of a strategic opportunity for China. It's leaders 25 00:01:46,920 --> 00:01:49,840 Speaker 2: liking to say these days that it's China that is 26 00:01:50,200 --> 00:01:55,040 Speaker 2: the stable and predictable world power. Well, discussing this, we 27 00:01:55,200 --> 00:01:58,960 Speaker 2: have first making her Trump and Noomic's debut, Fran Wang. 28 00:01:59,400 --> 00:02:01,400 Speaker 2: Fran is where in London for a few weeks, but 29 00:02:01,520 --> 00:02:05,200 Speaker 2: in her normal life she's a lynchpin of our China 30 00:02:05,280 --> 00:02:09,200 Speaker 2: Economy and government team in Beijing, having covered China's economy 31 00:02:09,240 --> 00:02:11,839 Speaker 2: for nearly twenty years. Fran, great to have you here, 32 00:02:12,200 --> 00:02:16,400 Speaker 2: Thanks for having me and from our Washington, DC bureau 33 00:02:16,600 --> 00:02:19,799 Speaker 2: Adam for our Adam is the senior geoeconomics analyst for 34 00:02:19,840 --> 00:02:23,400 Speaker 2: Asia Pacific Bloomberg Economics, and he previously served as the 35 00:02:23,520 --> 00:02:26,280 Speaker 2: senior advisor to Vice President Kamala Harris on the Indo 36 00:02:26,360 --> 00:02:30,440 Speaker 2: Pacific space and Intelligence. He also has written a piece 37 00:02:30,480 --> 00:02:32,919 Speaker 2: for US on how the war in Iran is changing 38 00:02:32,919 --> 00:02:36,240 Speaker 2: the relationship between the US and China. We had you 39 00:02:36,280 --> 00:02:39,720 Speaker 2: on Adam last when we discussed the Trump Administration's National 40 00:02:39,720 --> 00:02:42,760 Speaker 2: Security Strategy document back in December of twenty twenty five. 41 00:02:42,800 --> 00:02:46,160 Speaker 2: I feel like we've had several national security strategies since then. 42 00:02:46,480 --> 00:02:47,720 Speaker 2: But welcome back to the show. 43 00:02:48,560 --> 00:02:51,040 Speaker 1: Great to be here. It seems that things have certainly 44 00:02:51,080 --> 00:02:52,000 Speaker 1: evolved since then. 45 00:02:52,360 --> 00:02:58,760 Speaker 2: Evolved is one word for it. Yes, we'll talk about 46 00:02:58,760 --> 00:03:01,840 Speaker 2: the economy sort of traditional trumponomics fashion. We're going to 47 00:03:01,840 --> 00:03:05,799 Speaker 2: be interweaving the economy and the geopolitics, and we will 48 00:03:05,840 --> 00:03:08,120 Speaker 2: get to the economy in a minute. But Adam, you 49 00:03:08,160 --> 00:03:10,520 Speaker 2: have written a piece for US overnight, the conclusion of 50 00:03:10,520 --> 00:03:14,240 Speaker 2: which I thought set the stage rather well. You say 51 00:03:14,320 --> 00:03:17,240 Speaker 2: the risk of Beijing from a prolonged Middle East war 52 00:03:17,360 --> 00:03:20,839 Speaker 2: are real and a near term off ramp remains far 53 00:03:20,880 --> 00:03:24,520 Speaker 2: from certain for now, though China has the opportunity to 54 00:03:24,680 --> 00:03:29,200 Speaker 2: leverage the situation to its benefit. So just give us 55 00:03:29,200 --> 00:03:31,400 Speaker 2: a sense of how you reach that conclusion, and then 56 00:03:31,400 --> 00:03:32,720 Speaker 2: we'll do some unpacking. 57 00:03:33,680 --> 00:03:37,080 Speaker 1: Of course, so I think you've set it up well 58 00:03:37,120 --> 00:03:40,360 Speaker 1: on the intro. There's no doubt that Beijing does not 59 00:03:40,440 --> 00:03:43,360 Speaker 1: look kindly on the instability growing in the region right now. 60 00:03:43,560 --> 00:03:47,120 Speaker 1: While they certainly have i'm sure some happiness and seeing 61 00:03:47,120 --> 00:03:49,680 Speaker 1: the United States strategically dragged into another war in the 62 00:03:49,720 --> 00:03:52,640 Speaker 1: Middle East that distracts them potentially from the Indo Pacific, 63 00:03:52,680 --> 00:03:55,480 Speaker 1: as we'll talk a little bit about more, they're also 64 00:03:55,640 --> 00:04:00,920 Speaker 1: just very worried about the long term potential for the 65 00:04:01,560 --> 00:04:05,880 Speaker 1: Gulf to remain unstable, for oil supplies to be infrequent, 66 00:04:06,080 --> 00:04:08,400 Speaker 1: and to put stress on the economy at a time 67 00:04:08,560 --> 00:04:12,520 Speaker 1: when things are positive on the export side but still 68 00:04:12,520 --> 00:04:16,599 Speaker 1: struggling domestically, when with consumption not reaching the levels that 69 00:04:16,640 --> 00:04:19,679 Speaker 1: they need to maintain the demand necessary for the amount 70 00:04:19,680 --> 00:04:23,040 Speaker 1: of production they're doing internally. But at the same time, 71 00:04:23,520 --> 00:04:26,760 Speaker 1: there's no doubt that there are real opportunities for Beijing 72 00:04:26,800 --> 00:04:28,960 Speaker 1: in this moment, and we can kind of look at 73 00:04:28,960 --> 00:04:33,360 Speaker 1: that through three different lenses. The first is diplomatic. China 74 00:04:33,480 --> 00:04:37,640 Speaker 1: has spent a significant amount of effort and breath pushing 75 00:04:37,640 --> 00:04:40,440 Speaker 1: a narrative since Trump came to office that it is 76 00:04:40,520 --> 00:04:44,400 Speaker 1: the United States, not China, that is bringing instability to 77 00:04:44,480 --> 00:04:48,159 Speaker 1: the world, and that China is the real protector of 78 00:04:48,320 --> 00:04:52,120 Speaker 1: the rules based international order and even the United Nations, 79 00:04:52,279 --> 00:04:57,360 Speaker 1: and turning the narrative that was so persistent under pass administrations, 80 00:04:57,360 --> 00:05:01,680 Speaker 1: particularly the Biden administration, on its head. And while certainly 81 00:05:01,760 --> 00:05:04,479 Speaker 1: I think most of the world has the perspective to 82 00:05:04,520 --> 00:05:07,200 Speaker 1: realize that there is a lot of hypocrisy potentially and 83 00:05:07,240 --> 00:05:10,719 Speaker 1: that those arguments from Beijing, the reality is that the 84 00:05:10,760 --> 00:05:14,039 Speaker 1: actions of the United States has taken since President Trump 85 00:05:14,080 --> 00:05:18,560 Speaker 1: came to office, starting obviously with the Liberation Day tariffs, 86 00:05:18,600 --> 00:05:22,479 Speaker 1: moving towards the eventual bombing of Iran alongside Israel in June, 87 00:05:23,080 --> 00:05:26,719 Speaker 1: then of course the midnight raid to seize Nicholas Maduro 88 00:05:26,800 --> 00:05:29,800 Speaker 1: f of Venezuela, and now this ongoing four plus week 89 00:05:29,880 --> 00:05:33,760 Speaker 1: war in Iran. There is certainly appetite to accept this 90 00:05:33,880 --> 00:05:36,920 Speaker 1: narrative in a way that there wasn't before, particularly among 91 00:05:36,960 --> 00:05:40,280 Speaker 1: countries that are feeling the real pain of this instability 92 00:05:40,279 --> 00:05:45,680 Speaker 1: and uncertainty. At the same time, diplomatically, China historically does 93 00:05:45,720 --> 00:05:50,400 Speaker 1: not take particular interest in engaging in negotiations or trying 94 00:05:50,400 --> 00:05:54,440 Speaker 1: to lead piecework around the world. But here there's this 95 00:05:54,720 --> 00:05:58,560 Speaker 1: rare opening for them to potentially drastically increase their role 96 00:05:58,600 --> 00:06:01,280 Speaker 1: in the Middle East and their relations with key partners, 97 00:06:01,640 --> 00:06:04,200 Speaker 1: and that comes from a couple main drivers. The first 98 00:06:04,240 --> 00:06:06,520 Speaker 1: being that they're one of the unique countries on this 99 00:06:06,600 --> 00:06:09,400 Speaker 1: planet that have positive relations with Tehran and the Gulf 100 00:06:09,960 --> 00:06:14,280 Speaker 1: built around a massive economic relationship with Iran as their 101 00:06:14,320 --> 00:06:18,479 Speaker 1: primary economic conduit and partner, which is even dwarfed by 102 00:06:18,560 --> 00:06:21,160 Speaker 1: the relations with the Gulf that obviously relies heavily on 103 00:06:21,480 --> 00:06:24,840 Speaker 1: Gulf oil exports, but also a lot of economic trade. 104 00:06:25,560 --> 00:06:27,800 Speaker 1: And as a result, given the fact that the United 105 00:06:27,839 --> 00:06:31,200 Speaker 1: States is now considering ending the war without addressing the 106 00:06:31,560 --> 00:06:33,600 Speaker 1: flow of oil through the Strait of Hormuz and Iran's 107 00:06:33,600 --> 00:06:35,960 Speaker 1: control of that, there is this potential for Iran to 108 00:06:36,000 --> 00:06:40,520 Speaker 1: emerge as an intermediary negotiator to try and reopen the strait, 109 00:06:40,800 --> 00:06:43,080 Speaker 1: and that's not only because of those ties, but also 110 00:06:43,080 --> 00:06:45,839 Speaker 1: the simple reality that they are the largest purchaser of 111 00:06:45,880 --> 00:06:49,479 Speaker 1: the oil coming through the strait itself. Obviously, there's a 112 00:06:49,520 --> 00:06:51,720 Speaker 1: lot left to determine there and chin It may not 113 00:06:51,760 --> 00:06:55,799 Speaker 1: take that opportunity, but they certainly could more traditionally, though, 114 00:06:55,880 --> 00:06:58,960 Speaker 1: there is a simple numbers problem here for the United States. 115 00:06:59,200 --> 00:07:02,839 Speaker 1: The US has expended a huge amount of its most 116 00:07:02,880 --> 00:07:05,680 Speaker 1: advanced munitions in this conflict and continues to on a 117 00:07:05,720 --> 00:07:08,200 Speaker 1: day to day basis, and the reality is that those 118 00:07:08,240 --> 00:07:11,240 Speaker 1: long range missiles like Tomahawk cruise missiles and those defensive 119 00:07:11,560 --> 00:07:15,880 Speaker 1: missiles like Patriot interceptors are essential for any sort of 120 00:07:16,320 --> 00:07:20,400 Speaker 1: Indo Pacific contingency, whether that be the United States trying 121 00:07:20,440 --> 00:07:25,480 Speaker 1: to protect Taiwan or act in protection of the Philippines 122 00:07:25,480 --> 00:07:28,640 Speaker 1: and the South China Sea contingency, and all of that 123 00:07:28,800 --> 00:07:31,800 Speaker 1: leaves China in the mid term in a much better position, 124 00:07:31,920 --> 00:07:34,760 Speaker 1: potentially militarily. The other part of that, too, is that 125 00:07:34,760 --> 00:07:37,680 Speaker 1: we've seen a degradation in US assets through this conflict. 126 00:07:37,920 --> 00:07:41,400 Speaker 1: We saw the loss of a command control aircraft called 127 00:07:41,400 --> 00:07:45,480 Speaker 1: an a wax over the weekend, a strike that demonstrated 128 00:07:45,520 --> 00:07:48,480 Speaker 1: some support that Iran maybe getting from countries like Russia. 129 00:07:49,000 --> 00:07:52,280 Speaker 1: But nonetheless, the United States has few of these capabilities 130 00:07:52,360 --> 00:07:54,800 Speaker 1: left in the world, and while it is certainly working 131 00:07:54,840 --> 00:07:58,600 Speaker 1: to reconstitute them, those are years away, and as this 132 00:07:58,680 --> 00:08:01,400 Speaker 1: war is prolonged, we may see the additional losses that 133 00:08:01,480 --> 00:08:05,480 Speaker 1: further undermined its strategic position and its ability to enact 134 00:08:05,680 --> 00:08:09,520 Speaker 1: potentially its military plans in the Pacific. The last part 135 00:08:09,520 --> 00:08:12,480 Speaker 1: of this, I think we shouldn't forget is simply watching 136 00:08:12,480 --> 00:08:15,520 Speaker 1: and learning from what the United States is doing. I 137 00:08:15,560 --> 00:08:17,720 Speaker 1: think It's probably not lost to most people that this 138 00:08:17,800 --> 00:08:20,320 Speaker 1: is the largest military operation the United States has undertaken 139 00:08:20,480 --> 00:08:22,800 Speaker 1: arguably since the two thousand and three invasion of Iraq, 140 00:08:23,160 --> 00:08:25,760 Speaker 1: and a lot has changed since two thousand and three 141 00:08:25,800 --> 00:08:27,440 Speaker 1: in terms of the way of war and the way 142 00:08:27,440 --> 00:08:30,000 Speaker 1: the United States plans to fight a war. And so 143 00:08:30,160 --> 00:08:34,880 Speaker 1: here China is both I'm sure, concerned by the effectiveness 144 00:08:34,880 --> 00:08:37,760 Speaker 1: of US capabilities, but also learning from what they've seen 145 00:08:37,800 --> 00:08:40,320 Speaker 1: so far and taking the opportunity to see how the 146 00:08:40,400 --> 00:08:44,640 Speaker 1: US is integrating drones, new missile systems, and its air 147 00:08:44,679 --> 00:08:48,040 Speaker 1: power and naval power in a modern conventional fight. And 148 00:08:48,080 --> 00:08:49,920 Speaker 1: I want to be clear, obviously a fight in the 149 00:08:49,920 --> 00:08:53,000 Speaker 1: Indo Pacific, particularly over Taiwan, would have a very different character, 150 00:08:53,480 --> 00:08:57,280 Speaker 1: but the tools would be the same, and there's much 151 00:08:57,320 --> 00:08:59,959 Speaker 1: to be taken from this, and those who follow the 152 00:09:00,400 --> 00:09:03,280 Speaker 1: know China actually built its modern military very much off 153 00:09:03,280 --> 00:09:06,000 Speaker 1: of the lessons of the US invasion of Iraq in 154 00:09:06,040 --> 00:09:08,880 Speaker 1: their early nineties and Desert Storm, and so here's another 155 00:09:08,880 --> 00:09:11,440 Speaker 1: opportunity for them to learn and grow and be more 156 00:09:11,480 --> 00:09:14,640 Speaker 1: effective in any sort of contingency. Not to belabor this 157 00:09:14,679 --> 00:09:18,880 Speaker 1: too much is simply economic. Is the reality that China 158 00:09:19,120 --> 00:09:23,520 Speaker 1: has positioned itself through its massive growth in green energy, 159 00:09:23,720 --> 00:09:27,000 Speaker 1: its own domestic energy industry, and its reserves of oil 160 00:09:27,080 --> 00:09:30,559 Speaker 1: that is brought in over the last several years to 161 00:09:30,600 --> 00:09:32,680 Speaker 1: be able to weather this storm, and not only weather 162 00:09:33,120 --> 00:09:36,280 Speaker 1: the short term storm, but potentially serve as a gas 163 00:09:36,320 --> 00:09:38,880 Speaker 1: station for other parts of Asia. And we're starting to 164 00:09:38,880 --> 00:09:42,560 Speaker 1: see that already with these small but important deliveries of 165 00:09:42,640 --> 00:09:46,040 Speaker 1: key fuel stocks to the Philippines and Vietnam, and potentially 166 00:09:46,040 --> 00:09:49,480 Speaker 1: more to come, building on goodwill, highlighting the unique role 167 00:09:49,559 --> 00:09:51,840 Speaker 1: China can play as a stabilizing influence in the region 168 00:09:52,600 --> 00:09:56,440 Speaker 1: and demonstrating that China is a country that can be 169 00:09:56,559 --> 00:10:00,160 Speaker 1: prepared and can prosper through these types of crises. The 170 00:10:00,200 --> 00:10:03,920 Speaker 1: repercussions from this war are extreme. There is no doubt 171 00:10:04,080 --> 00:10:06,880 Speaker 1: that countries are going to have to rethink their energy 172 00:10:06,880 --> 00:10:11,640 Speaker 1: security and their China also stands to gain the China 173 00:10:11,720 --> 00:10:14,240 Speaker 1: has become by far the largest producer of green and 174 00:10:14,280 --> 00:10:19,000 Speaker 1: renewable energy technology in the world, and obviously the most capable, 175 00:10:19,080 --> 00:10:23,280 Speaker 1: it seems and commercially viable source of electric vehicles, both 176 00:10:23,280 --> 00:10:25,080 Speaker 1: of which are going to be in high demand as countries, 177 00:10:25,120 --> 00:10:28,720 Speaker 1: particularly in Southeast Asia and Africa, seek to insulate themselves 178 00:10:28,720 --> 00:10:29,600 Speaker 1: from further crises. 179 00:10:30,040 --> 00:10:32,760 Speaker 2: Well, that's the fantastic survey. Thanks Adam. And actually, and 180 00:10:32,800 --> 00:10:35,280 Speaker 2: you've also taken us a little bit onto the economy. 181 00:10:35,400 --> 00:10:37,480 Speaker 2: We're going to touch on a few things and sort 182 00:10:37,520 --> 00:10:40,679 Speaker 2: of go deeper into the economy. But a few things 183 00:10:40,480 --> 00:10:44,840 Speaker 2: that Adam mentioned there it's worth remembering since we haven't 184 00:10:44,840 --> 00:10:47,400 Speaker 2: talked about the Chinese economy for a while on this show. 185 00:10:48,040 --> 00:10:53,560 Speaker 2: The basic state of China's growth coming into this year, 186 00:10:53,679 --> 00:10:58,240 Speaker 2: coming into this crisis, I mean it's recovering, but still 187 00:10:58,400 --> 00:11:03,040 Speaker 2: quite subject to deflation and excess supply is still very 188 00:11:03,040 --> 00:11:06,640 Speaker 2: dependent on exports. What's the basic state of the economy. 189 00:11:07,280 --> 00:11:12,120 Speaker 3: Yeah, the economy has been recovering since it reopened from 190 00:11:12,240 --> 00:11:15,679 Speaker 3: COVID zero four years ago now or three to four 191 00:11:15,760 --> 00:11:20,200 Speaker 3: years ago now. However, the recovery has always been like 192 00:11:20,520 --> 00:11:26,439 Speaker 3: two speed, with production staying very strong but consumption struggling 193 00:11:26,440 --> 00:11:29,640 Speaker 3: to pick up. And the key reason why production has 194 00:11:29,679 --> 00:11:33,840 Speaker 3: been strong is because of exports, and exports contributed to 195 00:11:34,240 --> 00:11:37,760 Speaker 3: nearly a third of GDP growth last year, which was 196 00:11:37,800 --> 00:11:42,520 Speaker 3: the highest since nineteen ninety seven. So exports have been 197 00:11:42,640 --> 00:11:46,840 Speaker 3: a key support for China's growth, especially if you think 198 00:11:46,880 --> 00:11:51,680 Speaker 3: about how long deflation has been plaguing the economy for years, 199 00:11:52,080 --> 00:11:57,000 Speaker 3: and also domestic consumption has been so weak. Retail sales 200 00:11:57,080 --> 00:12:01,880 Speaker 3: growth was still quite tapid despite government subsidized cash for 201 00:12:01,960 --> 00:12:07,120 Speaker 3: clunkers program for like two years. So really domestically, China's 202 00:12:07,160 --> 00:12:10,520 Speaker 3: economy is still suffering from over capacity as you mentioned, 203 00:12:11,080 --> 00:12:15,840 Speaker 3: and also years long housing slump which really battered consumer 204 00:12:15,880 --> 00:12:18,479 Speaker 3: and business confidence most countries. 205 00:12:19,040 --> 00:12:23,120 Speaker 2: This is really an unwelcome shock, and I'm thinking, you know, 206 00:12:23,120 --> 00:12:25,360 Speaker 2: I'm obviously sitting in the UK, but we're constantly doing 207 00:12:25,360 --> 00:12:28,040 Speaker 2: the numbers of what it is going to mean for growth, 208 00:12:28,160 --> 00:12:32,600 Speaker 2: for inflation, to have this significant rise in energy prices. 209 00:12:32,760 --> 00:12:34,959 Speaker 2: I mean, China's not immune to that, right. 210 00:12:35,400 --> 00:12:39,560 Speaker 3: Yeah, I mean China has been suffering from deflation, so 211 00:12:40,120 --> 00:12:44,680 Speaker 3: price rises should be welcome. However, it depends on how 212 00:12:45,000 --> 00:12:49,040 Speaker 3: broad the price rise will be. Judging from the current situation, 213 00:12:49,200 --> 00:12:53,960 Speaker 3: you could see that most likely beneficiary would be upstream industries, 214 00:12:54,440 --> 00:13:00,920 Speaker 3: oil minerals, resources companies. Downstream companies will find it extremely 215 00:13:01,000 --> 00:13:05,880 Speaker 3: hard to pass the costs onto consumers because completion is 216 00:13:05,960 --> 00:13:09,680 Speaker 3: still so fierce in the country. And if you think 217 00:13:09,720 --> 00:13:14,920 Speaker 3: about how deeply rooted the excess capacity problem is The 218 00:13:14,960 --> 00:13:19,080 Speaker 3: government has been launching the so called anti involution campaign 219 00:13:19,360 --> 00:13:22,960 Speaker 3: for many many months now. The effect, however, is still 220 00:13:23,080 --> 00:13:27,559 Speaker 3: quite limited. Unlike ten years ago when a similar campaign 221 00:13:27,640 --> 00:13:32,160 Speaker 3: was launched, this time around, companies suffering from overcapacity are 222 00:13:32,320 --> 00:13:37,400 Speaker 3: in privately owned industries and sectors the government may want 223 00:13:37,440 --> 00:13:42,000 Speaker 3: to support, like renewable energy, so that makes it harder 224 00:13:42,040 --> 00:13:46,080 Speaker 3: for the government to take a strong handed administrative approach 225 00:13:46,440 --> 00:13:48,520 Speaker 3: to addressing this issue this time around. 226 00:13:48,800 --> 00:13:52,080 Speaker 2: Such an ugly word, but they the involution. We should 227 00:13:52,280 --> 00:13:55,360 Speaker 2: remind people what that means. I mean, the basic sense 228 00:13:55,440 --> 00:13:56,920 Speaker 2: is that some of the reason that they've done so 229 00:13:57,000 --> 00:13:59,120 Speaker 2: well in all these new technologies and other things in 230 00:13:59,160 --> 00:14:02,479 Speaker 2: these industries is that they've got lots of companies competing. 231 00:14:03,000 --> 00:14:05,840 Speaker 2: But that produces excess investment, excess supply. 232 00:14:06,040 --> 00:14:09,559 Speaker 3: Is that the basic yeah, and lead to workers working 233 00:14:09,920 --> 00:14:14,080 Speaker 3: extremely long hours without properly compensated. 234 00:14:13,800 --> 00:14:15,600 Speaker 2: Which you could also say is a core part of 235 00:14:15,640 --> 00:14:19,120 Speaker 2: the Chinese economic model. Just one last one for now 236 00:14:19,200 --> 00:14:22,280 Speaker 2: for you, Fran again, just to remind us, because it's 237 00:14:22,320 --> 00:14:24,720 Speaker 2: confusing when we talk about how they've built up their 238 00:14:24,840 --> 00:14:29,000 Speaker 2: energy sufficiency, but they're also have been getting a lot 239 00:14:29,000 --> 00:14:32,880 Speaker 2: of oil out of Iran. What is their capacity to 240 00:14:32,880 --> 00:14:37,040 Speaker 2: withstand reduced supplies of oil and gas from the rest 241 00:14:37,080 --> 00:14:37,520 Speaker 2: of the world. 242 00:14:38,080 --> 00:14:41,720 Speaker 3: Yeah, as Adam mentioned, China has been building oil reserves 243 00:14:41,720 --> 00:14:45,800 Speaker 3: over the past few years. Some analysts put China's oil 244 00:14:45,880 --> 00:14:51,200 Speaker 3: reserves as sufficient for meeting more than eighty days of 245 00:14:51,600 --> 00:14:55,160 Speaker 3: refining needs. So I'd say there is no short term 246 00:14:55,600 --> 00:15:01,360 Speaker 3: immediate shortage oil shortage concern. However, for long term, even 247 00:15:01,440 --> 00:15:05,440 Speaker 3: though China has been pushing for more renewable energy for 248 00:15:05,520 --> 00:15:08,640 Speaker 3: more than a decade now, renewable energy still accounts for 249 00:15:08,720 --> 00:15:12,480 Speaker 3: just about twenty percent of its total energy consumption. More 250 00:15:12,520 --> 00:15:16,600 Speaker 3: than fifty percent of its energy consumption is met by coal, 251 00:15:17,320 --> 00:15:22,360 Speaker 3: which China fortunately has abundant reserves of. However, if we 252 00:15:22,440 --> 00:15:27,280 Speaker 3: want to reach present She's carbon neutral goals, and also 253 00:15:27,440 --> 00:15:31,240 Speaker 3: if we don't want to repeat the serious air pollution 254 00:15:31,520 --> 00:15:35,600 Speaker 3: problems were about decade ago, there's no way that China 255 00:15:35,680 --> 00:15:38,680 Speaker 3: can switch back to coal in a massive way. So 256 00:15:38,840 --> 00:15:42,160 Speaker 3: there's always a trade off you have to balance, and 257 00:15:42,400 --> 00:15:45,280 Speaker 3: I think this well, the war in Iran will just 258 00:15:45,600 --> 00:16:00,760 Speaker 3: strengthen China's determination to expound further into renewable energy. 259 00:16:02,040 --> 00:16:03,640 Speaker 2: I guess on the one hand, China is trying to 260 00:16:03,640 --> 00:16:06,760 Speaker 2: show off, it kind of got its strategy. It was 261 00:16:06,760 --> 00:16:09,160 Speaker 2: ahead of the curve and preparing itself for these things. 262 00:16:09,200 --> 00:16:13,960 Speaker 2: But it also wants to, where it makes sense, use 263 00:16:14,000 --> 00:16:17,280 Speaker 2: some of its excess capacity or some of its strength 264 00:16:17,320 --> 00:16:20,600 Speaker 2: in these sectors to make friends and influence people. So 265 00:16:20,840 --> 00:16:21,840 Speaker 2: where are we seeing that? 266 00:16:22,400 --> 00:16:24,240 Speaker 1: I think the reality is that a lot of this 267 00:16:24,440 --> 00:16:27,960 Speaker 1: was already underway, right the push, particularly in parts of 268 00:16:28,000 --> 00:16:33,320 Speaker 1: Southeast Asia and even in Europe, to push heavily into renewables, 269 00:16:33,480 --> 00:16:37,040 Speaker 1: and the reality being to do that in most industries, 270 00:16:37,080 --> 00:16:41,280 Speaker 1: particularly solar and wind. You're really talking about Chinese technology. 271 00:16:41,480 --> 00:16:44,280 Speaker 1: Certainly there are some European companies putting out wind turbines 272 00:16:44,320 --> 00:16:47,360 Speaker 1: as well, but for Southeast Asia this is a China question. 273 00:16:47,600 --> 00:16:50,800 Speaker 1: And what we're seeing here now is less a new 274 00:16:50,880 --> 00:16:55,240 Speaker 1: movement towards renewables, but rather an effort to revitalize and 275 00:16:55,240 --> 00:16:58,560 Speaker 1: potentially speed up that transition. Now, you know, it's still 276 00:16:58,640 --> 00:17:01,400 Speaker 1: very early going here. Were as much as this war 277 00:17:01,480 --> 00:17:04,240 Speaker 1: seems to have gone on forever, it's only been four weeks. 278 00:17:04,440 --> 00:17:08,440 Speaker 1: And if the crisis ebbs or starts to really stop 279 00:17:08,480 --> 00:17:10,800 Speaker 1: here in the near term and the straight reopens, we 280 00:17:10,840 --> 00:17:13,600 Speaker 1: may not see the same push with the same urgency 281 00:17:13,600 --> 00:17:15,760 Speaker 1: that people are talking about it now. But I think 282 00:17:15,800 --> 00:17:19,080 Speaker 1: that right now that's where we would expect to see 283 00:17:19,119 --> 00:17:22,399 Speaker 1: further growth. We've already seen big inroads from companies like 284 00:17:22,440 --> 00:17:26,439 Speaker 1: BYD and other electric vehicle companies throughout Southeast Asia now 285 00:17:26,480 --> 00:17:30,760 Speaker 1: increasingly Europe, and efforts to push into other regions in 286 00:17:30,800 --> 00:17:34,399 Speaker 1: particularly in the Middle East. So I think all of that, 287 00:17:34,520 --> 00:17:37,000 Speaker 1: you know, the Chinese stand to benefit even if there's 288 00:17:37,119 --> 00:17:39,120 Speaker 1: marginal change in the near term. 289 00:17:39,280 --> 00:17:43,600 Speaker 2: This is an opportunity for China to sell its net 290 00:17:43,800 --> 00:17:48,240 Speaker 2: zero technology and products to other goods. But also short 291 00:17:48,320 --> 00:17:52,040 Speaker 2: term it can sell some fossil fuels to countries that 292 00:17:52,119 --> 00:17:55,160 Speaker 2: have caught short. So what's happening there. 293 00:17:55,880 --> 00:17:59,400 Speaker 1: What we've seen so far is very much an evolution, 294 00:18:00,119 --> 00:18:02,399 Speaker 1: you know, since the start of the war, as the 295 00:18:02,480 --> 00:18:06,280 Speaker 1: air and the pipeline of oil to Asia kind of 296 00:18:06,280 --> 00:18:09,320 Speaker 1: moves its way through and starts to hit Asian markets 297 00:18:10,000 --> 00:18:12,280 Speaker 1: that's been created by the shutdown of the Strait of Hormuz. 298 00:18:12,440 --> 00:18:17,280 Speaker 1: And for some countries like China, Japan, Korea, Australia, they've 299 00:18:17,280 --> 00:18:21,080 Speaker 1: got reserves, they have options, they have budget flexibility. But 300 00:18:21,160 --> 00:18:25,199 Speaker 1: for others, particularly in Southeast Asia, who have much tighter 301 00:18:25,280 --> 00:18:29,360 Speaker 1: fiscal realities. We're already starting to see this crisis turn 302 00:18:29,440 --> 00:18:34,360 Speaker 1: into a shortage situation with key products, and we saw 303 00:18:34,400 --> 00:18:38,040 Speaker 1: a declaration of an energy emergency in the Philippines. We've 304 00:18:38,080 --> 00:18:42,520 Speaker 1: seen countries including Vietnam, Indonesia, and the Philippines discuss cutting 305 00:18:42,920 --> 00:18:47,080 Speaker 1: flights between certain countries because of a lack of jet 306 00:18:47,080 --> 00:18:51,240 Speaker 1: fuel availability because of limited storage in those countries. And 307 00:18:51,640 --> 00:18:54,360 Speaker 1: so far, the limited reporting we have on what China 308 00:18:54,480 --> 00:18:56,440 Speaker 1: the actions China has taken is to try and address 309 00:18:56,480 --> 00:18:58,880 Speaker 1: those immediate concerns in some of these countries, and that's 310 00:18:58,880 --> 00:19:01,520 Speaker 1: been with the delivery of jets fuel and diesel and 311 00:19:01,920 --> 00:19:06,080 Speaker 1: trying to provide a little bit of its refining capability 312 00:19:06,400 --> 00:19:10,200 Speaker 1: to meet its neighbors partners' needs. To keep in mind, 313 00:19:10,240 --> 00:19:11,919 Speaker 1: this is also happening on top of the fact that 314 00:19:12,040 --> 00:19:15,600 Speaker 1: China put in place and export ban on refined products 315 00:19:15,840 --> 00:19:18,600 Speaker 1: almost immediately following the closure of the Strait of frommus 316 00:19:18,840 --> 00:19:22,119 Speaker 1: which highlights how they are very clearly strategically thinking about 317 00:19:22,160 --> 00:19:25,520 Speaker 1: how to deploy these refined products less for profit but 318 00:19:25,680 --> 00:19:27,000 Speaker 1: more for diplomatic gain. 319 00:19:27,760 --> 00:19:30,360 Speaker 2: I'm struck because in other context we talk about there 320 00:19:30,400 --> 00:19:34,920 Speaker 2: being really quite difficult relations with Philippines, the Philippines out 321 00:19:34,960 --> 00:19:41,960 Speaker 2: in the ocean, when they're increasingly fractious territorial disputes. Is 322 00:19:42,000 --> 00:19:43,960 Speaker 2: there any sense that that could come into any of 323 00:19:44,000 --> 00:19:45,080 Speaker 2: these conversations. 324 00:19:45,880 --> 00:19:48,840 Speaker 1: I certainly can't speak to how Beijing is viewing this 325 00:19:48,920 --> 00:19:52,639 Speaker 1: current moment, but the actions do speak clearly to the 326 00:19:52,680 --> 00:19:56,080 Speaker 1: idea that they are both being flexible and creative in 327 00:19:56,119 --> 00:20:00,359 Speaker 1: how they're utilizing these resources and seeing opportunity and seeing 328 00:20:00,359 --> 00:20:04,280 Speaker 1: a moment to potentially reframe the discussion, even if marginally, 329 00:20:04,440 --> 00:20:07,960 Speaker 1: in the domestic populations and the political environments in these countries. 330 00:20:08,280 --> 00:20:10,560 Speaker 1: You know, Vietnam is a very different situation in terms 331 00:20:10,600 --> 00:20:14,480 Speaker 1: of its historic political relationship, but even there, it's obviously 332 00:20:14,560 --> 00:20:17,680 Speaker 1: a stressed relationship over the South China Sea and broader 333 00:20:17,720 --> 00:20:20,320 Speaker 1: competition between the two And so the fact that they 334 00:20:20,359 --> 00:20:22,840 Speaker 1: were willing to move quickly to deliver, just to be clear, 335 00:20:22,840 --> 00:20:26,480 Speaker 1: are relatively small cargoes but would have a tangible impact, 336 00:20:27,119 --> 00:20:30,439 Speaker 1: you know, does say something about them thinking creatively about 337 00:20:30,480 --> 00:20:33,840 Speaker 1: how to use their leverage in this moment, with the 338 00:20:33,880 --> 00:20:36,159 Speaker 1: idea that you know, they may not be able to 339 00:20:36,200 --> 00:20:38,119 Speaker 1: do this for very long, depending on how long this 340 00:20:38,160 --> 00:20:38,760 Speaker 1: conflict goes. 341 00:20:39,480 --> 00:20:41,239 Speaker 2: Mid Fran it sort of feels like, I mean, all 342 00:20:41,280 --> 00:20:46,199 Speaker 2: these potential levers economic and diplomatic that the Chinese can 343 00:20:46,240 --> 00:20:49,359 Speaker 2: be thinking about deploying now. I mean it speaks to 344 00:20:49,400 --> 00:20:52,119 Speaker 2: this the level of sort of redundancy that they've built 345 00:20:52,160 --> 00:20:54,919 Speaker 2: into their economy. I guess President she Jen calls it 346 00:20:54,960 --> 00:20:57,080 Speaker 2: the fortress economy. 347 00:20:57,200 --> 00:20:57,359 Speaker 3: You know. 348 00:20:57,359 --> 00:20:59,000 Speaker 2: It feels almost a bit like, you know when they 349 00:20:59,040 --> 00:21:01,199 Speaker 2: sort of try and reassure you about jumbo jets and 350 00:21:01,200 --> 00:21:03,240 Speaker 2: they say, you know, there's a million things that go wrong, 351 00:21:03,280 --> 00:21:05,840 Speaker 2: and we have got another engine, and we've got you know, 352 00:21:05,880 --> 00:21:08,960 Speaker 2: all these different things that we can resort to. It 353 00:21:09,440 --> 00:21:13,720 Speaker 2: feels like China has all these additional spare engines sitting 354 00:21:13,760 --> 00:21:17,080 Speaker 2: there and alternative planes, and the rest of the world 355 00:21:17,119 --> 00:21:20,240 Speaker 2: has left itself rather vulnerable despite having gone through the 356 00:21:20,280 --> 00:21:24,399 Speaker 2: COVID experience. Is this ultimately sort of bad news for 357 00:21:24,440 --> 00:21:26,760 Speaker 2: the rest of us though, because it means that it's 358 00:21:26,800 --> 00:21:29,600 Speaker 2: making the case for having all of this excess supply 359 00:21:30,040 --> 00:21:33,880 Speaker 2: and redundancy in the Chinese economy, which, in if you're 360 00:21:33,880 --> 00:21:38,280 Speaker 2: competing with Chinese products overseas, not much fun at all. 361 00:21:38,960 --> 00:21:42,760 Speaker 3: Yeah, I think the price competitiveness will be there to stay. 362 00:21:43,520 --> 00:21:47,680 Speaker 3: And also in terms of policymakers thinking. President she himself 363 00:21:47,760 --> 00:21:51,520 Speaker 3: and the polar Buro have repeatedly stressed on the so 364 00:21:51,680 --> 00:21:56,160 Speaker 3: called bottom line thinking, which I think it's basically always 365 00:21:56,400 --> 00:22:01,120 Speaker 3: think about what you can do in area of crisis, 366 00:22:01,600 --> 00:22:05,720 Speaker 3: even if your situation now is still quite safe. Our 367 00:22:05,760 --> 00:22:10,200 Speaker 3: government sources, while speaking to us before, actually said frankly 368 00:22:10,840 --> 00:22:14,080 Speaker 3: that one of the reasons that they are not in 369 00:22:14,119 --> 00:22:18,199 Speaker 3: the rush to address of a capacity in sectors like 370 00:22:18,760 --> 00:22:23,280 Speaker 3: renewable energy and other energy sectors is because of the 371 00:22:23,320 --> 00:22:27,200 Speaker 3: possibility of a crisis like in a war. So and 372 00:22:27,240 --> 00:22:29,800 Speaker 3: that was quite early, it was like a couple of 373 00:22:29,880 --> 00:22:30,280 Speaker 3: years ago. 374 00:22:30,720 --> 00:22:33,200 Speaker 2: We should still remember though that you may have lots 375 00:22:33,240 --> 00:22:36,880 Speaker 2: of spare sources of energy and back up this back 376 00:22:36,920 --> 00:22:38,879 Speaker 2: up that one thing they haven't got as a backup 377 00:22:38,920 --> 00:22:43,040 Speaker 2: engine is anything to replace foreign demand to fuel their economy. 378 00:22:43,080 --> 00:22:45,320 Speaker 2: As you mentioned at the start, they're very dependent on 379 00:22:45,760 --> 00:22:49,600 Speaker 2: foreign export. If this continues, the risk of a global 380 00:22:49,640 --> 00:22:53,640 Speaker 2: recession is what not one that China is well prepared 381 00:22:53,640 --> 00:22:54,760 Speaker 2: to withstand right now? 382 00:22:54,840 --> 00:22:58,520 Speaker 3: Right yeah, I think that would be a true concern 383 00:22:58,680 --> 00:23:03,760 Speaker 3: for Beijing. If for demand collapse is because domestic demound 384 00:23:03,960 --> 00:23:06,320 Speaker 3: I think in the past it was driven by two 385 00:23:06,400 --> 00:23:12,960 Speaker 3: key sectors infrastructure and property. But infrastructure investment has been 386 00:23:13,240 --> 00:23:19,520 Speaker 3: very inefficient now because of the saturation issue and because 387 00:23:19,520 --> 00:23:24,680 Speaker 3: of the slowing pace of urbanization, and in terms of property, 388 00:23:24,760 --> 00:23:28,879 Speaker 3: the government seems to be quite reluctant to repeat the 389 00:23:29,200 --> 00:23:33,480 Speaker 3: aggressive stimulus it applied to rescue the sector back in 390 00:23:33,560 --> 00:23:36,560 Speaker 3: probably twenty to fifteen. I think one of the reasons 391 00:23:36,600 --> 00:23:41,240 Speaker 3: is because they hope to replace property as a growth 392 00:23:41,240 --> 00:23:48,159 Speaker 3: engine with more innovative tach sector growth. So that makes 393 00:23:48,200 --> 00:23:53,359 Speaker 3: it quite hard for the Chinese government to really find 394 00:23:53,480 --> 00:23:57,159 Speaker 3: another immediate replacement for foreign demand. 395 00:23:57,480 --> 00:24:00,399 Speaker 2: Of course, it's true of everybody. We're all wishing that 396 00:24:00,440 --> 00:24:03,119 Speaker 2: it's not going to last too long. Of course, we 397 00:24:03,240 --> 00:24:07,520 Speaker 2: tend to say the big disadvantage for China is how 398 00:24:07,600 --> 00:24:13,320 Speaker 2: little it's used its military in fifty years, almost forty years. 399 00:24:13,440 --> 00:24:17,840 Speaker 2: When people talk about this having in some sense lowered 400 00:24:17,880 --> 00:24:21,959 Speaker 2: the bar for China to flex its muscles more than 401 00:24:22,000 --> 00:24:26,480 Speaker 2: it already does militarily in Asia, is that a real 402 00:24:26,520 --> 00:24:30,880 Speaker 2: prospect from this Because you've identified mainly diplomatic advantages. 403 00:24:30,520 --> 00:24:35,000 Speaker 1: I think the bigger impact on China's potential calculus is 404 00:24:35,040 --> 00:24:37,880 Speaker 1: the capabilities of the United States, and that comes down 405 00:24:38,000 --> 00:24:41,480 Speaker 1: to the drawdown of US munitions in this conflict and 406 00:24:41,800 --> 00:24:44,600 Speaker 1: advanced capabilities that may be destroyed. As we were discussing 407 00:24:44,640 --> 00:24:47,560 Speaker 1: briefly before, you know, just to put that in context, 408 00:24:48,760 --> 00:24:51,880 Speaker 1: the United States from twenty twenty one to twenty twenty 409 00:24:51,880 --> 00:24:55,080 Speaker 1: four purchased two hundred and forty seven cruise missiles or 410 00:24:55,160 --> 00:24:57,960 Speaker 1: Tomahawk cruise missiles. There's reporting now that the United States 411 00:24:58,000 --> 00:25:01,040 Speaker 1: may have expended over twelve hundred of those missiles during 412 00:25:01,040 --> 00:25:04,360 Speaker 1: this conflict. And I use that as just an illustrative 413 00:25:04,359 --> 00:25:06,280 Speaker 1: example of the fact that the United States is simply 414 00:25:06,280 --> 00:25:11,040 Speaker 1: not producing these tools at a rate to replace them 415 00:25:11,080 --> 00:25:13,480 Speaker 1: in a timely manner. And while there's certainly a lot 416 00:25:13,520 --> 00:25:16,600 Speaker 1: of focus now on an advancing the United States defense 417 00:25:16,640 --> 00:25:19,680 Speaker 1: industrial base so that it can produce things faster, we're 418 00:25:19,720 --> 00:25:22,600 Speaker 1: not so far seeing the fruits of that. And so 419 00:25:22,680 --> 00:25:26,520 Speaker 1: that means that in some critical capabilities, the United States 420 00:25:26,600 --> 00:25:30,359 Speaker 1: may be less positioned to follow through with some of 421 00:25:30,400 --> 00:25:33,879 Speaker 1: its planning for a military operation in the Pacific in 422 00:25:33,920 --> 00:25:36,879 Speaker 1: the next couple of years. And so as China thinks 423 00:25:36,880 --> 00:25:39,520 Speaker 1: about what it wants to do and it's freedom of action, 424 00:25:39,840 --> 00:25:44,120 Speaker 1: it has potentially more flexibility in that space in terms 425 00:25:44,160 --> 00:25:46,679 Speaker 1: of learning, though, I mean, I think your point is 426 00:25:46,680 --> 00:25:50,240 Speaker 1: spot on. What China desperately needs is military experience, and 427 00:25:50,320 --> 00:25:53,160 Speaker 1: the reality being that the military hasn't conducted an operation 428 00:25:53,280 --> 00:25:56,040 Speaker 1: of any sufficient size since nineteen seventy nine and the 429 00:25:56,920 --> 00:26:01,280 Speaker 1: border fight with Vietnam. And so there is a lot 430 00:26:01,359 --> 00:26:04,159 Speaker 1: they can take from watching and learning from the United States, 431 00:26:04,200 --> 00:26:06,480 Speaker 1: and they will have a lot of data to work 432 00:26:06,480 --> 00:26:09,120 Speaker 1: with coming both from their partner and Iran their own 433 00:26:09,200 --> 00:26:11,520 Speaker 1: collection assets, and I'm sure working and talking with the 434 00:26:11,600 --> 00:26:14,040 Speaker 1: Russians there'll be a lot they can learn and try 435 00:26:14,080 --> 00:26:18,720 Speaker 1: and adjust their own planning to address. But at the 436 00:26:18,800 --> 00:26:21,040 Speaker 1: end of the day, as you said, you know, the 437 00:26:21,080 --> 00:26:24,800 Speaker 1: real test will be how they operate in a real scenario, 438 00:26:24,920 --> 00:26:26,879 Speaker 1: and we simply don't know what that will look like. 439 00:26:27,040 --> 00:26:29,639 Speaker 1: And so I don't think Beijing looks at this moment 440 00:26:29,680 --> 00:26:32,000 Speaker 1: and says, ah, the window is now open for us 441 00:26:32,040 --> 00:26:35,520 Speaker 1: to act, but simply that there is now opportunity for 442 00:26:35,560 --> 00:26:39,480 Speaker 1: them to learn and grow their own military planning to 443 00:26:39,520 --> 00:26:42,600 Speaker 1: potentially increase the odds of success when they choose to act. 444 00:26:43,560 --> 00:26:49,680 Speaker 2: We should look ahead briefly to the Shi Trump summit delayed, 445 00:26:49,960 --> 00:26:54,359 Speaker 2: but we were hearing from Karen Levitt and others this week. 446 00:26:54,440 --> 00:26:58,560 Speaker 2: It's very much on schedule now in for May Adam. 447 00:26:58,640 --> 00:27:02,360 Speaker 2: How do you expect all these advantages and the sort 448 00:27:02,359 --> 00:27:07,359 Speaker 2: of complex picture that we've painted over the last thirty 449 00:27:07,400 --> 00:27:10,280 Speaker 2: minutes or so, how do you think that will play 450 00:27:10,320 --> 00:27:13,680 Speaker 2: out in the summit? How is this Iran conflict going 451 00:27:13,720 --> 00:27:17,000 Speaker 2: to affect the way that summit looks and feels, and 452 00:27:17,040 --> 00:27:19,000 Speaker 2: what possible outcomes. 453 00:27:18,800 --> 00:27:21,239 Speaker 1: In many ways from the core outcomes that we're going 454 00:27:21,240 --> 00:27:23,720 Speaker 1: to see in the objectives that both sides are moving 455 00:27:23,760 --> 00:27:26,560 Speaker 1: forward on. From a more technical level, I don't think 456 00:27:26,560 --> 00:27:28,240 Speaker 1: we're going to see much change at all in the 457 00:27:28,280 --> 00:27:31,359 Speaker 1: sense that the priorities that were put forward prior to 458 00:27:31,359 --> 00:27:35,920 Speaker 1: the Iran conflict, about maintaining stability in the relationship, ensuring 459 00:27:36,119 --> 00:27:39,399 Speaker 1: the flow of critical minerals and rare earth to the 460 00:27:39,480 --> 00:27:43,199 Speaker 1: United States, finding a tariff level that both countries are 461 00:27:43,200 --> 00:27:48,600 Speaker 1: comfortable with, increasing Chinese purchases, and potentially addressing the future 462 00:27:48,640 --> 00:27:51,159 Speaker 1: of Taiwan are all issues that are still on the 463 00:27:51,200 --> 00:27:54,320 Speaker 1: table and have not shifted significantly because of the conflict 464 00:27:54,320 --> 00:27:56,560 Speaker 1: in and of itself. But at the same time, there's 465 00:27:56,560 --> 00:28:00,320 Speaker 1: no doubt that the overall narrative of the visit could 466 00:28:00,359 --> 00:28:03,480 Speaker 1: be significantly impacted with how the United States ends this 467 00:28:03,600 --> 00:28:07,720 Speaker 1: conflict and whether it emerges victorious as the President has said, 468 00:28:08,240 --> 00:28:11,879 Speaker 1: or somewhat damaged by their inability to potentially open the 469 00:28:11,920 --> 00:28:15,399 Speaker 1: straight of the horn moves, leaving Golf partners in a position, 470 00:28:15,720 --> 00:28:17,760 Speaker 1: you know, potentially worse than they were prior to the 471 00:28:17,800 --> 00:28:20,159 Speaker 1: conflict in terms of broader instability and the risk to 472 00:28:20,200 --> 00:28:23,720 Speaker 1: the global energy supply chain. So I think that's really 473 00:28:23,720 --> 00:28:25,959 Speaker 1: where we're going to see the impact. And I do 474 00:28:26,000 --> 00:28:27,960 Speaker 1: think this is a good point to remind folks that 475 00:28:28,440 --> 00:28:33,080 Speaker 1: for China, their relationship with Iran certainly has value to them, 476 00:28:33,200 --> 00:28:35,000 Speaker 1: but at the end of the day, they're far more 477 00:28:35,000 --> 00:28:37,800 Speaker 1: interested and concerned about their core needs and interest in 478 00:28:37,840 --> 00:28:41,920 Speaker 1: the region, which is energy supplies. And so while you know, 479 00:28:42,160 --> 00:28:45,080 Speaker 1: bombing of Iran has been a major issue for Bijing 480 00:28:45,120 --> 00:28:49,360 Speaker 1: and their pushback of on the administration for doing so, 481 00:28:50,920 --> 00:28:53,520 Speaker 1: I see it highly unlikely that the President she spends 482 00:28:53,600 --> 00:28:56,360 Speaker 1: much time talking about Iran in and of itself with 483 00:28:56,520 --> 00:28:59,960 Speaker 1: President Trump outside of what President Trump wants to raise 484 00:29:00,360 --> 00:29:03,800 Speaker 1: during the meetings. The bigger question is where would they 485 00:29:03,880 --> 00:29:06,160 Speaker 1: land on these critical issues that we've already gone over, 486 00:29:06,720 --> 00:29:10,000 Speaker 1: and will the meeting go forward on the timeline that's 487 00:29:10,040 --> 00:29:12,120 Speaker 1: been put forward, given the fact that we simply don't 488 00:29:12,160 --> 00:29:15,280 Speaker 1: know right now when this war will end, and how 489 00:29:15,320 --> 00:29:18,360 Speaker 1: that could impact both this meeting and the theoretically up 490 00:29:18,400 --> 00:29:20,560 Speaker 1: to four additional meetings they're supposed to have this year. 491 00:29:20,680 --> 00:29:22,360 Speaker 2: You would have been in a position to plan some 492 00:29:22,440 --> 00:29:24,560 Speaker 2: of these international meetings when you were sitting in the 493 00:29:24,560 --> 00:29:26,920 Speaker 2: White House and working working for the Vice President. And 494 00:29:27,040 --> 00:29:30,600 Speaker 2: you have to feel sorry for the skeleton team that 495 00:29:30,880 --> 00:29:33,360 Speaker 2: they're now trying to even begin to think about how 496 00:29:33,400 --> 00:29:37,440 Speaker 2: that summit's to play out. Fran I give you a 497 00:29:37,440 --> 00:29:39,600 Speaker 2: little last word just on that summit. I mean you 498 00:29:39,640 --> 00:29:43,520 Speaker 2: and I were in Hong Kong together not so long 499 00:29:43,520 --> 00:29:48,200 Speaker 2: ago talking about our expectations for the summit. Are you 500 00:29:48,280 --> 00:29:51,320 Speaker 2: looking at that meeting from a different perspective now or 501 00:29:51,360 --> 00:29:53,560 Speaker 2: expecting anything different to come out of it as a 502 00:29:53,600 --> 00:29:55,400 Speaker 2: result of the last few weeks. 503 00:29:56,240 --> 00:30:00,200 Speaker 3: I just wonder how China would make anny gains in 504 00:30:00,280 --> 00:30:05,600 Speaker 3: terms of asking the US to relax its tech export technology, 505 00:30:05,720 --> 00:30:09,000 Speaker 3: or would it ask for it at all now? Given 506 00:30:09,320 --> 00:30:13,160 Speaker 3: the progress Chinese companies have made, and probably they want 507 00:30:13,200 --> 00:30:16,480 Speaker 3: to put up a phase of not afraid of being 508 00:30:16,560 --> 00:30:20,280 Speaker 3: boycott or cut off from key technology. We can't always 509 00:30:20,280 --> 00:30:24,640 Speaker 3: give up our own. And another point is I think 510 00:30:24,720 --> 00:30:28,480 Speaker 3: the US will asks for China to buy a lot 511 00:30:28,560 --> 00:30:32,640 Speaker 3: more agricultural products. I think that could be one of 512 00:30:32,680 --> 00:30:34,960 Speaker 3: the major requests by the US. 513 00:30:35,680 --> 00:30:39,200 Speaker 2: Yeah, all those farmers who are hurting from well another 514 00:30:39,280 --> 00:30:41,960 Speaker 2: reason now higher fertilizer prices, along with all the other 515 00:30:42,000 --> 00:30:47,160 Speaker 2: ones that they've been given by this administration. Adam fran 516 00:30:47,560 --> 00:30:49,600 Speaker 2: thank you so much, Thank you. 517 00:30:50,040 --> 00:30:50,960 Speaker 1: Thanks for having. 518 00:30:56,560 --> 00:31:08,000 Speaker 2: Thanks for listening to Trumponomics from Bloomberg. It was hosted 519 00:31:08,000 --> 00:31:11,120 Speaker 2: by me Stephanie Flanders, and I was joined by Bloomberg 520 00:31:11,200 --> 00:31:16,200 Speaker 2: Economics senior geoeconomics analysts Adam Ferrar and Fran Wang from 521 00:31:16,240 --> 00:31:20,560 Speaker 2: Bloomberg's China Economy and Government team. Trumponomics was produced by 522 00:31:20,600 --> 00:31:24,320 Speaker 2: Moses Dam with Summer Sadi and help from Amy Keen. 523 00:31:24,920 --> 00:31:29,080 Speaker 2: Sound design was by Blake Maples and Kelly Gary. Please 524 00:31:29,120 --> 00:31:32,239 Speaker 2: help others find us and enjoy this show, rate it 525 00:31:32,360 --> 00:31:34,520 Speaker 2: and review it highly wherever you listen