WEBVTT - Second Cup: Should you raise your goals over time

0:00:03.520 --> 0:00:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Before Breakfast, a production of iHeartRadio. Good Morning.

0:00:10.400 --> 0:00:14.880
<v Speaker 1>This is Laura. Welcome to the Before Breakfast podcast. Today's

0:00:14.880 --> 0:00:17.280
<v Speaker 1>tip is to know when it's smart to make your

0:00:17.320 --> 0:00:21.480
<v Speaker 1>goals more challenging and when you're best off keeping them simple.

0:00:22.680 --> 0:00:26.239
<v Speaker 1>Both are sometimes wise, but in general I think the

0:00:26.360 --> 0:00:30.760
<v Speaker 1>latter is more often the case than the former. I

0:00:30.840 --> 0:00:32.599
<v Speaker 1>was thinking of this when I got a letter from

0:00:32.640 --> 0:00:35.800
<v Speaker 1>a Before Breakfast listener who had been setting daily fitness

0:00:35.800 --> 0:00:40.080
<v Speaker 1>goals on his phone recently. He wrote, my phone asked

0:00:40.120 --> 0:00:43.000
<v Speaker 1>me to change my daily fitness goals because I had

0:00:43.000 --> 0:00:47.320
<v Speaker 1>been meeting them fairly frequently. This got me thinking, is

0:00:47.360 --> 0:00:50.120
<v Speaker 1>it better for someone to set goals that are right

0:00:50.200 --> 0:00:53.720
<v Speaker 1>on the cusp of being attainable and being accepting of

0:00:53.800 --> 0:00:56.840
<v Speaker 1>falling a little short from time to time, or to

0:00:56.880 --> 0:01:00.320
<v Speaker 1>set goals that should be achievable and celebrate even more

0:01:00.640 --> 0:01:04.640
<v Speaker 1>when you exceed those goals. It's a good question, and

0:01:04.680 --> 0:01:08.120
<v Speaker 1>there's no universal right answer. I think that the answer

0:01:08.280 --> 0:01:11.399
<v Speaker 1>varies depending on what you're trying to do. For instance,

0:01:11.480 --> 0:01:16.160
<v Speaker 1>many people pursue personal records or prs and races, and

0:01:16.240 --> 0:01:18.919
<v Speaker 1>the whole point of a PR is that once you

0:01:18.959 --> 0:01:21.600
<v Speaker 1>set a PR, you have to go faster to set

0:01:21.600 --> 0:01:25.039
<v Speaker 1>a new one. If you're recovering from an illness or injury,

0:01:25.080 --> 0:01:27.240
<v Speaker 1>it might make sense to raise your goals over time,

0:01:27.720 --> 0:01:30.399
<v Speaker 1>because something that was difficult at the beginning might be

0:01:30.440 --> 0:01:33.280
<v Speaker 1>really easy in a few weeks or months, and so

0:01:33.319 --> 0:01:36.120
<v Speaker 1>it might make sense to push yourself since you know

0:01:36.200 --> 0:01:38.959
<v Speaker 1>that the future will be so different from the present.

0:01:40.280 --> 0:01:42.520
<v Speaker 1>That said, I'm a much bigger fan of what I

0:01:42.600 --> 0:01:47.320
<v Speaker 1>call process goals than outcome goals. Outcome goals are things

0:01:47.360 --> 0:01:50.360
<v Speaker 1>like running a sub two hour half marathon, or getting

0:01:50.360 --> 0:01:52.720
<v Speaker 1>an A in a class, or signing up a certain

0:01:52.760 --> 0:01:56.040
<v Speaker 1>number of new clients for bank accounts. It's not that

0:01:56.080 --> 0:01:59.400
<v Speaker 1>there's anything wrong with these goals per se, it's set

0:01:59.440 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 1>some factor are out of your control, which can be discouraging,

0:02:03.920 --> 0:02:08.880
<v Speaker 1>and in certain situations, outcome goals can also skew people's incentives.

0:02:09.680 --> 0:02:11.920
<v Speaker 1>An A in a class is not a good in

0:02:11.960 --> 0:02:15.080
<v Speaker 1>its own right. It's just a letter on a piece

0:02:15.120 --> 0:02:18.920
<v Speaker 1>of paper. What matters is that it represents the accumulation

0:02:19.160 --> 0:02:22.040
<v Speaker 1>of knowledge. But when the A becomes a good in

0:02:22.080 --> 0:02:26.080
<v Speaker 1>its own right, people become tempted to cheat. Think of

0:02:26.120 --> 0:02:30.440
<v Speaker 1>school systems fudging test scores. Likewise, you can bring new

0:02:30.480 --> 0:02:32.840
<v Speaker 1>clients to a bank by offering a great product and

0:02:33.000 --> 0:02:36.720
<v Speaker 1>great customer service. Or you can invent NEWGA accounts out

0:02:36.760 --> 0:02:39.640
<v Speaker 1>of whole cloth and hope no one notices before the

0:02:39.639 --> 0:02:42.680
<v Speaker 1>bonus checks get cashed. I think we've all read the

0:02:42.680 --> 0:02:47.240
<v Speaker 1>headlines about that story. Process goals, on the other hand,

0:02:47.480 --> 0:02:50.640
<v Speaker 1>are goods in their own right. These are habits by

0:02:50.680 --> 0:02:53.280
<v Speaker 1>another name, and they do tend to lead to the

0:02:53.320 --> 0:02:56.600
<v Speaker 1>desired outcomes over time. But even if you don't meet

0:02:56.639 --> 0:03:00.919
<v Speaker 1>a specific outcome, you're probably better off than would be otherwise.

0:03:01.800 --> 0:03:05.080
<v Speaker 1>A process goal is something like my running streak, running

0:03:05.120 --> 0:03:08.000
<v Speaker 1>every day for at least a mile. Or if we

0:03:08.040 --> 0:03:11.000
<v Speaker 1>think of our academic example, rather than aiming to get

0:03:11.000 --> 0:03:13.480
<v Speaker 1>an A and A class, you set a goal to

0:03:13.480 --> 0:03:16.360
<v Speaker 1>study for at least five hours a week, And rather

0:03:16.400 --> 0:03:19.080
<v Speaker 1>than focus on how many new clients you land, you

0:03:19.120 --> 0:03:22.280
<v Speaker 1>set a goal to ask existing clients to refer people

0:03:22.280 --> 0:03:26.359
<v Speaker 1>to you every time you have a positive interaction. By

0:03:26.400 --> 0:03:30.000
<v Speaker 1>their nature, process goals tend not to benefit from raising

0:03:30.000 --> 0:03:34.440
<v Speaker 1>them over time. The point is to just keep doing

0:03:34.480 --> 0:03:40.560
<v Speaker 1>them again and again and again. By keeping them relatively simple,

0:03:41.120 --> 0:03:43.960
<v Speaker 1>we keep them in our lives, even when it would

0:03:43.960 --> 0:03:47.760
<v Speaker 1>be easier not to Most days I run a lot

0:03:47.800 --> 0:03:50.360
<v Speaker 1>more than one mile, and I'm always happy when I do.

0:03:51.280 --> 0:03:53.880
<v Speaker 1>But by keeping the mile as my goal, I don't

0:03:53.920 --> 0:03:56.760
<v Speaker 1>feel any resistance to it, and I don't feel like

0:03:56.800 --> 0:03:59.400
<v Speaker 1>a failure. On the days when I can't run much

0:03:59.440 --> 0:04:05.160
<v Speaker 1>more done a mile, I just keep going. So in general,

0:04:05.200 --> 0:04:07.640
<v Speaker 1>my thought is that unless you're really gunning for something

0:04:07.720 --> 0:04:11.480
<v Speaker 1>big and you're excited about a more challenging goal, it's

0:04:11.480 --> 0:04:15.280
<v Speaker 1>best to keep the goals simple and doable. Our listener

0:04:15.320 --> 0:04:18.000
<v Speaker 1>is probably better off aiming for five thousand steps a

0:04:18.080 --> 0:04:21.760
<v Speaker 1>day and exceeding this regularly, but still feeling good on

0:04:21.800 --> 0:04:24.120
<v Speaker 1>the days when he's tired or on a plane for

0:04:24.200 --> 0:04:27.520
<v Speaker 1>ten hours and he only hits five thousand steps, then

0:04:27.560 --> 0:04:31.599
<v Speaker 1>following his fitness apps directive to change his goals. Daily

0:04:31.680 --> 0:04:38.400
<v Speaker 1>success is motivational failure, generally, isn't. I prefer to celebrate

0:04:38.720 --> 0:04:42.120
<v Speaker 1>what goes right now. I know that goals are a

0:04:42.160 --> 0:04:44.720
<v Speaker 1>big deal in productivity circles, so I'm happy to get

0:04:44.760 --> 0:04:47.839
<v Speaker 1>notes from people telling me why I'm wrong and challenging

0:04:47.880 --> 0:04:50.200
<v Speaker 1>goals that involve a big risk of failure are the

0:04:50.200 --> 0:04:52.240
<v Speaker 1>way to go. You can let me know what you

0:04:52.279 --> 0:04:57.080
<v Speaker 1>think at before breakfast podcast at iHeartMedia dot com. In

0:04:57.120 --> 0:05:01.000
<v Speaker 1>the meantime, this is Laura. Thanks for listen and here's

0:05:01.040 --> 0:05:10.039
<v Speaker 1>to making the most of our time. Hey, everybody, I'd

0:05:10.040 --> 0:05:12.520
<v Speaker 1>love to hear from you. You can send me your tips,

0:05:12.600 --> 0:05:16.320
<v Speaker 1>your questions, or anything else. Just connect with me on Twitter,

0:05:16.600 --> 0:05:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Facebook and Instagram at Before Breakfast Pod. That's b E

0:05:22.000 --> 0:05:26.719
<v Speaker 1>the number four then Breakfast pod. You can also shoot

0:05:26.720 --> 0:05:31.160
<v Speaker 1>me an email at Before Breakfast podcast at iHeartMedia dot com.

0:05:31.200 --> 0:05:33.720
<v Speaker 1>That Before Breakfast is spelled out with all the letters.

0:05:34.360 --> 0:05:36.440
<v Speaker 1>Thanks so much. Should I look forward to staying in touch.

0:05:42.240 --> 0:05:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Before Breakfast is a production of iHeartRadio. For more podcasts

0:05:46.320 --> 0:05:51.240
<v Speaker 1>from iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever

0:05:51.320 --> 0:05:56.640
<v Speaker 1>you listen to your favorite shows.