WEBVTT - Microsoft Slips on Report of Lower Demand for Some AI Tools 

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:10.559
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. You're listening to the

0:00:10.600 --> 0:00:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at ten am

0:00:14.600 --> 0:00:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on Applecarplay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App.

0:00:18.640 --> 0:00:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts, or watch

0:00:21.960 --> 0:00:23.480
<v Speaker 1>us live on YouTube.

0:00:23.960 --> 0:00:26.520
<v Speaker 2>A lot of tech stories out there, including the one

0:00:26.520 --> 0:00:29.800
<v Speaker 2>here Microsoft here. The question is I guess the information

0:00:30.560 --> 0:00:34.320
<v Speaker 2>was out earlier that multiple Microsoft divisions lowered how much

0:00:34.560 --> 0:00:37.680
<v Speaker 2>salespeople are supposed to grow their sales of certain air

0:00:37.760 --> 0:00:40.919
<v Speaker 2>products after many missed sales goals in the fiscal year

0:00:40.920 --> 0:00:43.440
<v Speaker 2>and in June. That's what the Information Reporter earlier. Today,

0:00:43.479 --> 0:00:48.600
<v Speaker 2>Microsoft though, has not lowered sales quotas and targets for salespeople.

0:00:48.600 --> 0:00:51.879
<v Speaker 2>That's according to CNBC. They reported that on air, siting

0:00:52.400 --> 0:00:54.639
<v Speaker 2>an emailed statement for Microsoft. So I don't know what's

0:00:54.640 --> 0:00:56.600
<v Speaker 2>going on out there. Microsoft stocks down a little bit

0:00:56.640 --> 0:00:59.440
<v Speaker 2>here on a Rod Rana, technology analyst to Bloomberg Intelligence

0:00:59.520 --> 0:01:04.800
<v Speaker 2>joins this year just kind of put that information reporting

0:01:04.840 --> 0:01:06.920
<v Speaker 2>the CNBC kind of rebutting it. I mean, just give

0:01:06.959 --> 0:01:09.040
<v Speaker 2>us a sense of kind of AI sales how this

0:01:09.080 --> 0:01:12.120
<v Speaker 2>thing is kind of progressing, because I can't imagine there's

0:01:12.120 --> 0:01:14.600
<v Speaker 2>any material slowdown in AI from what I've heard.

0:01:15.760 --> 0:01:17.839
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Aulso when you look at there are two different

0:01:17.840 --> 0:01:21.760
<v Speaker 3>elements of it. One is the AI infrastructure piece of it. Well,

0:01:21.800 --> 0:01:24.240
<v Speaker 3>there is no slowdown in Microsoft at that point in fact,

0:01:24.280 --> 0:01:27.679
<v Speaker 3>that Microsoft is capacity constraints right now. But to be honest,

0:01:27.720 --> 0:01:29.800
<v Speaker 3>that's not the sales quota somebody is looking at it.

0:01:29.840 --> 0:01:33.000
<v Speaker 3>That just comes in because you're hosting somebody's model, or

0:01:33.000 --> 0:01:36.560
<v Speaker 3>you're trying to get you're hosting chat GPT. The sales

0:01:36.600 --> 0:01:40.400
<v Speaker 3>quotas would be for products such as you know, Microsoft Copilot,

0:01:40.600 --> 0:01:44.760
<v Speaker 3>Office Copilot, Getthub Copilot, all those products. And you know

0:01:44.800 --> 0:01:47.440
<v Speaker 3>that's not the same for everything. There are certain products

0:01:47.440 --> 0:01:49.880
<v Speaker 3>that sell better than the others because of the use

0:01:49.920 --> 0:01:52.880
<v Speaker 3>case of it. Kittub Copilot, for example, because it's a

0:01:52.920 --> 0:01:57.640
<v Speaker 3>coding software platform. The Microsoft Office Copilot is a good

0:01:57.720 --> 0:02:01.040
<v Speaker 3>piece of software or copilot, but it's very expensive. It's

0:02:01.080 --> 0:02:03.160
<v Speaker 3>I think thirty dollars per use of per month, so

0:02:03.400 --> 0:02:06.840
<v Speaker 3>it's not an Apple set of apples comparison throughout the board.

0:02:07.040 --> 0:02:08.920
<v Speaker 3>One of the things that we've been talking about is

0:02:09.360 --> 0:02:12.320
<v Speaker 3>even when you look at the broader tech spending, there

0:02:12.360 --> 0:02:14.960
<v Speaker 3>is a big slowdown when you exclude AI. So that

0:02:15.000 --> 0:02:18.840
<v Speaker 3>could be one reason that enterprise are not comfortable spending

0:02:18.880 --> 0:02:22.160
<v Speaker 3>that level of money right now on those individual software pieces.

0:02:22.480 --> 0:02:24.919
<v Speaker 3>The second piece could be the implementation part of it.

0:02:25.000 --> 0:02:28.480
<v Speaker 3>Because you're buying these sometimes there's data products that you

0:02:28.520 --> 0:02:32.560
<v Speaker 3>have to include in your core software or your core applications,

0:02:32.720 --> 0:02:34.680
<v Speaker 3>and that may take time. So there is a lot

0:02:35.560 --> 0:02:38.440
<v Speaker 3>to be digest from a macro piece. I don't think

0:02:38.440 --> 0:02:39.880
<v Speaker 3>there is any slowdown.

0:02:40.040 --> 0:02:43.720
<v Speaker 4>Honor on how is Microsoft tracking against its competitors in

0:02:43.800 --> 0:02:45.360
<v Speaker 4>terms of AI software.

0:02:46.280 --> 0:02:48.880
<v Speaker 3>It is doing much better than everybody else. But again

0:02:49.160 --> 0:02:53.200
<v Speaker 3>with the caveat because they host chatchipt. This is when

0:02:53.200 --> 0:02:55.920
<v Speaker 3>they invested in chat GPT, you know, I don't know

0:02:55.960 --> 0:02:58.639
<v Speaker 3>six seven years ago. That is part of that thing

0:02:58.800 --> 0:03:01.680
<v Speaker 3>was when you're running that application, it runs on their cloud.

0:03:01.919 --> 0:03:03.840
<v Speaker 3>So when you see that, you know, within a three

0:03:03.919 --> 0:03:06.400
<v Speaker 3>year period you have what five hundred and six million

0:03:06.480 --> 0:03:09.520
<v Speaker 3>users out there when we use chat GPT, a large

0:03:09.560 --> 0:03:12.679
<v Speaker 3>portion of that revenue flows into Microsoft Cloud. So when

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:15.440
<v Speaker 3>they are the ones that have seen the first phase

0:03:15.480 --> 0:03:18.560
<v Speaker 3>of the big benefit of AI. But as we have said,

0:03:18.720 --> 0:03:21.239
<v Speaker 3>you know many times before, all the other vendors will

0:03:21.240 --> 0:03:24.000
<v Speaker 3>see that down the road. When adoption grows in other

0:03:24.040 --> 0:03:26.880
<v Speaker 3>areas of the ecosystem.

0:03:27.080 --> 0:03:31.040
<v Speaker 2>Salesforce reports after the close here what should we expect

0:03:31.080 --> 0:03:32.240
<v Speaker 2>from them?

0:03:32.400 --> 0:03:34.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it goes back to the first piece of what

0:03:34.360 --> 0:03:37.280
<v Speaker 3>I said was enterprise spending is week when you're looking

0:03:37.360 --> 0:03:40.400
<v Speaker 3>at Fortune two thousand companies, they're not hiding at that

0:03:40.440 --> 0:03:43.000
<v Speaker 3>same pace that they used to and we will exclude

0:03:43.000 --> 0:03:46.920
<v Speaker 3>AI companies from it. And that is that weighs on

0:03:47.080 --> 0:03:50.880
<v Speaker 3>the sales of somebody like a salesforce, somebody like a

0:03:50.920 --> 0:03:55.320
<v Speaker 3>workday because they build on a per head basis. So

0:03:55.720 --> 0:03:58.200
<v Speaker 3>when these companies are not hiding at that same rate,

0:03:58.480 --> 0:04:01.120
<v Speaker 3>Salesforce has a tough time to grow their subscription base.

0:04:01.440 --> 0:04:03.000
<v Speaker 3>And you know, we think it is going to be

0:04:03.160 --> 0:04:05.120
<v Speaker 3>very much in line with what they had last time,

0:04:05.240 --> 0:04:08.680
<v Speaker 3>somewhere around at nine ten percent, which is not bad,

0:04:08.760 --> 0:04:10.280
<v Speaker 3>but it's not very exciting as well.

0:04:11.080 --> 0:04:13.000
<v Speaker 2>I mean, is that enough for the stock to be

0:04:13.080 --> 0:04:15.920
<v Speaker 2>down as much as it is here to date?

0:04:16.080 --> 0:04:18.279
<v Speaker 4>I mean it just seems like thirty percent down.

0:04:18.360 --> 0:04:20.960
<v Speaker 2>You're exactly down thirty percent for this is a company

0:04:20.960 --> 0:04:23.680
<v Speaker 2>that just has has been such a great growth story.

0:04:24.480 --> 0:04:26.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so when you and you know, when you look

0:04:26.920 --> 0:04:29.600
<v Speaker 3>at last year, there was a lot of excitement when

0:04:29.600 --> 0:04:32.400
<v Speaker 3>they launched a product called Agent Force, which was their

0:04:32.520 --> 0:04:35.680
<v Speaker 3>answer or the AI answer to the rest of the universe.

0:04:36.080 --> 0:04:38.720
<v Speaker 3>But what happened was the adoption rate has not been

0:04:38.760 --> 0:04:41.640
<v Speaker 3>as strong as the initial you could say the demo

0:04:41.880 --> 0:04:43.760
<v Speaker 3>was so if you look at the stock price, it

0:04:43.839 --> 0:04:45.640
<v Speaker 3>kind of went out quite a bit of when they

0:04:45.720 --> 0:04:49.240
<v Speaker 3>first launched that particular product. Now this year it's not

0:04:49.320 --> 0:04:51.040
<v Speaker 3>showing up in the numbers, and this is one of

0:04:51.120 --> 0:04:53.640
<v Speaker 3>the reasons you're not seeing the stock recovering from that.

0:04:54.440 --> 0:04:56.920
<v Speaker 4>What about Oracle, It seems like there's some worries around

0:04:56.960 --> 0:04:59.440
<v Speaker 4>artificial intelligence there as well. We're looking at a credit

0:04:59.520 --> 0:05:01.559
<v Speaker 4>risk game and reaching as high as since two thousand

0:05:01.600 --> 0:05:01.880
<v Speaker 4>and nine.

0:05:02.800 --> 0:05:05.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and that is why I think the very very

0:05:05.400 --> 0:05:08.400
<v Speaker 3>valid question is what happens to Oracle. When you look

0:05:08.400 --> 0:05:12.479
<v Speaker 3>at this entire AI bubble narrative or the framework, you know,

0:05:12.520 --> 0:05:14.720
<v Speaker 3>you have the big cloud providers that are spending the

0:05:14.720 --> 0:05:17.400
<v Speaker 3>most amount of money. We say, when you look at

0:05:17.400 --> 0:05:20.240
<v Speaker 3>somebody like an Amazon, Microsoft, and Google, they are spending

0:05:20.279 --> 0:05:22.760
<v Speaker 3>quite a bit, but they have real, you know, awesome

0:05:23.360 --> 0:05:25.960
<v Speaker 3>cash flow that's coming in. Plus they have businesses, so

0:05:26.040 --> 0:05:28.880
<v Speaker 3>even if they overbuild, they will have capacity to use it.

0:05:29.360 --> 0:05:32.599
<v Speaker 3>The bigger question is what happens to open ai oracle relationship.

0:05:32.920 --> 0:05:36.919
<v Speaker 3>Open Ai has said that they have given Oracle, you

0:05:36.960 --> 0:05:39.479
<v Speaker 3>could say, a contract of about three hundred billion dollars

0:05:40.080 --> 0:05:42.880
<v Speaker 3>to bleed in terms of sales over the next several years.

0:05:43.000 --> 0:05:45.840
<v Speaker 3>They're going to first build some massive data centers and

0:05:45.920 --> 0:05:48.000
<v Speaker 3>then they're going to use Oracle as a cloud provider.

0:05:48.320 --> 0:05:50.159
<v Speaker 3>The big question is where is opening IM going to

0:05:50.200 --> 0:05:53.080
<v Speaker 3>get money from, And that's really what's weighing on that

0:05:53.160 --> 0:05:55.719
<v Speaker 3>particular part of the equation. And to be very honest,

0:05:55.760 --> 0:05:59.840
<v Speaker 3>there is genuine reason to figure out, like how is

0:06:00.000 --> 0:06:02.160
<v Speaker 3>wi is going to raise that money and how are

0:06:02.160 --> 0:06:04.520
<v Speaker 3>they going to spend So there is some reason to

0:06:04.560 --> 0:06:06.960
<v Speaker 3>be consumed, but not so much on the credit de

0:06:07.000 --> 0:06:09.599
<v Speaker 3>false side of it, but so much more as the

0:06:09.720 --> 0:06:12.359
<v Speaker 3>estimates that are out there for the opious.

0:06:14.240 --> 0:06:17.320
<v Speaker 2>Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Intelligence coming up after this.

0:06:20.960 --> 0:06:24.640
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:06:24.720 --> 0:06:27.799
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple, Cocklay and Android

0:06:27.839 --> 0:06:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand wherever

0:06:31.200 --> 0:06:34.679
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:06:34.920 --> 0:06:38.080
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's talk a little retail Macy's at with

0:06:38.120 --> 0:06:40.480
<v Speaker 2>some numbers. I thought the numbers were pretty good. Stocks

0:06:40.520 --> 0:06:42.320
<v Speaker 2>off one point seven percent, So what do I know?

0:06:42.640 --> 0:06:45.400
<v Speaker 2>Mary Ross Gilbert Senior Echody Allen, she covers the retailer.

0:06:45.520 --> 0:06:48.960
<v Speaker 2>She's the expert for Bloomberg Intelligence. She's based out there

0:06:49.000 --> 0:06:51.839
<v Speaker 2>in la Mary talks us about Macy's. What do we

0:06:51.839 --> 0:06:53.240
<v Speaker 2>hear from them today with the results.

0:06:55.400 --> 0:06:58.760
<v Speaker 5>So, Paul, we saw, actually, I think great results coming

0:06:58.760 --> 0:07:01.640
<v Speaker 5>out of Macy's this morning, you see, And so when

0:07:01.680 --> 0:07:04.560
<v Speaker 5>you think about it, the stock is off, but that's

0:07:04.640 --> 0:07:09.040
<v Speaker 5>because the company put out conservative fourth quarter guidance and

0:07:09.080 --> 0:07:10.560
<v Speaker 5>that's really what they always do.

0:07:10.720 --> 0:07:11.840
<v Speaker 3>They seek to beat.

0:07:11.680 --> 0:07:15.080
<v Speaker 5>Their numbers, and so that guidance came in very close,

0:07:15.200 --> 0:07:17.160
<v Speaker 5>you know, at the high end. It's right around where

0:07:17.200 --> 0:07:20.120
<v Speaker 5>analysts are because they already saw strong results come in

0:07:20.120 --> 0:07:24.640
<v Speaker 5>from other retailers. But we think, when we think about it,

0:07:24.720 --> 0:07:28.640
<v Speaker 5>we think there's upside here. So we really view the

0:07:28.680 --> 0:07:32.720
<v Speaker 5>results as look Macy's name plate because of all the

0:07:32.800 --> 0:07:35.480
<v Speaker 5>changes that they're making, and what that means is they're

0:07:35.480 --> 0:07:39.280
<v Speaker 5>bringing in more relevant brands that are resonating with their consumer.

0:07:39.840 --> 0:07:43.960
<v Speaker 5>Not only that, but the stores look brighter. There's really

0:07:44.080 --> 0:07:48.040
<v Speaker 5>kind of exciting music in the stores, the store associates

0:07:48.120 --> 0:07:51.640
<v Speaker 5>are more engaged with the customer. We've noticed that on

0:07:51.680 --> 0:07:55.080
<v Speaker 5>our channel texts, particularly on Black Friday, we saw more

0:07:55.160 --> 0:07:58.000
<v Speaker 5>traffic in the store than we've seen in years past.

0:07:58.480 --> 0:08:02.040
<v Speaker 5>So we think that the change is that CEO Tony

0:08:02.120 --> 0:08:05.720
<v Speaker 5>Sprain is making and he's really taking his cues from

0:08:05.720 --> 0:08:09.560
<v Speaker 5>what he's done at Bloomingdale's. It's resonating, it's working, and

0:08:09.600 --> 0:08:12.760
<v Speaker 5>so we think this momentum is building and we certainly

0:08:12.800 --> 0:08:15.040
<v Speaker 5>saw it in the third quarter numbers with comp sales

0:08:16.000 --> 0:08:19.360
<v Speaker 5>two point seven percent for the Go Forward stores, and

0:08:19.440 --> 0:08:22.560
<v Speaker 5>so with that, I mean that's a big improvement sequentially,

0:08:22.960 --> 0:08:25.800
<v Speaker 5>and so we think that's building going into the fourth

0:08:25.880 --> 0:08:30.000
<v Speaker 5>quarter and just with the constant improvement that we're seeing there.

0:08:31.080 --> 0:08:33.280
<v Speaker 4>So when most people think about the retail space right now,

0:08:33.320 --> 0:08:36.520
<v Speaker 4>a lot of people think about the transition to e commerce,

0:08:36.559 --> 0:08:38.400
<v Speaker 4>but it sounds as though from what you're explaining, a

0:08:38.400 --> 0:08:40.679
<v Speaker 4>lot of people are going there in person. I mean,

0:08:40.679 --> 0:08:43.360
<v Speaker 4>I'm looking at Coohal's, I'm looking at Dillard's. All of

0:08:43.400 --> 0:08:46.600
<v Speaker 4>these stocks are up pretty substantially on the year, alongside Macy's.

0:08:47.120 --> 0:08:50.280
<v Speaker 4>What are they doing in particular that's really attracting customers

0:08:50.360 --> 0:08:52.920
<v Speaker 4>to come through the doors. Is it also collaborations with

0:08:53.000 --> 0:08:54.120
<v Speaker 4>celebrities by chance?

0:08:56.040 --> 0:08:58.920
<v Speaker 5>Yes, you raised a valid point, and it is. It

0:08:58.960 --> 0:09:04.120
<v Speaker 5>does include collaborations. So for example, they Aqua, you know,

0:09:04.160 --> 0:09:07.480
<v Speaker 5>they're under their Bloomingdale's brand, currently has a collab going

0:09:07.520 --> 0:09:12.760
<v Speaker 5>out with a designer out of Lawn and so yes,

0:09:12.800 --> 0:09:16.880
<v Speaker 5>these collaborations also even you know, they'll have some events.

0:09:17.440 --> 0:09:20.800
<v Speaker 5>But all of that is is certainly drawing in new customers,

0:09:20.800 --> 0:09:24.520
<v Speaker 5>and I think Macy's nameplate could certainly do more on

0:09:24.559 --> 0:09:26.840
<v Speaker 5>that end. They had their first collab with their on

0:09:26.960 --> 0:09:29.840
<v Speaker 5>thirty fourth brand this year, but we think we're going

0:09:29.880 --> 0:09:31.920
<v Speaker 5>to see more next year because if you look at

0:09:31.920 --> 0:09:34.920
<v Speaker 5>what Dillard's has been doing over the last few years,

0:09:35.240 --> 0:09:38.720
<v Speaker 5>and they have a different business model than Macy's does.

0:09:38.800 --> 0:09:42.760
<v Speaker 5>They're not really promotional. For example, for Black Friday, they

0:09:42.840 --> 0:09:46.120
<v Speaker 5>just had clearance sales and it was pretty comparable to

0:09:46.200 --> 0:09:48.640
<v Speaker 5>last year, so that didn't mean that the rest of

0:09:48.679 --> 0:09:52.400
<v Speaker 5>the merchandise was on sale. Macy's the you know, as

0:09:52.480 --> 0:09:56.959
<v Speaker 5>far more promotional. But by doing collaborations, you know, by

0:09:57.000 --> 0:10:00.319
<v Speaker 5>getting celebrities involved. So for example, for the holiday, they

0:10:00.320 --> 0:10:05.480
<v Speaker 5>have Jennifer Hudson that's you know, fronting their campaign for

0:10:05.559 --> 0:10:11.200
<v Speaker 5>the holiday, and they're also engaging with social influencers. So yes,

0:10:11.520 --> 0:10:14.680
<v Speaker 5>all of that is resonating. We're seeing it with other brands,

0:10:14.760 --> 0:10:18.320
<v Speaker 5>like for example, with American Eagle, which just tapped Martha

0:10:18.440 --> 0:10:21.040
<v Speaker 5>Stewart and that that's appealing to gen z.

0:10:22.000 --> 0:10:22.439
<v Speaker 4>Oh wow.

0:10:22.559 --> 0:10:24.000
<v Speaker 2>So one.

0:10:25.160 --> 0:10:29.319
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, So these bold campaigns that these brands are doing,

0:10:29.440 --> 0:10:33.520
<v Speaker 5>Macy's is also getting involved there and they're dipping their

0:10:33.559 --> 0:10:35.360
<v Speaker 5>to I would say they're dipping their toe in the water.

0:10:35.440 --> 0:10:38.520
<v Speaker 5>But I think we're going to see that increase, you know,

0:10:38.600 --> 0:10:42.000
<v Speaker 5>and build as we get into twenty twenty six. And

0:10:42.040 --> 0:10:44.400
<v Speaker 5>when you talk about the digital business, because of course

0:10:44.440 --> 0:10:48.240
<v Speaker 5>you're always hearing, let's say, stronger growth on digital. For example,

0:10:48.280 --> 0:10:51.360
<v Speaker 5>when we looked at Black Friday, you know, over the

0:10:51.400 --> 0:10:55.520
<v Speaker 5>weekend through Cyber Monday, the sale strength was really led

0:10:55.800 --> 0:10:59.360
<v Speaker 5>by digital. Digital was up double digits versus you know,

0:10:59.480 --> 0:11:02.360
<v Speaker 5>load to mid single digits for in the store, So

0:11:02.440 --> 0:11:07.199
<v Speaker 5>I think that's really positive there. So when we look

0:11:07.240 --> 0:11:10.040
<v Speaker 5>at Macy's, a third of their sales come from digital,

0:11:10.120 --> 0:11:13.319
<v Speaker 5>so still in store is very big, but it's also

0:11:13.480 --> 0:11:17.280
<v Speaker 5>omni channel well, the ability to buy online, take back

0:11:17.320 --> 0:11:19.880
<v Speaker 5>in store or buy online, pick up in store.

0:11:20.679 --> 0:11:23.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, when I walked to Penn Station today, I'm going

0:11:23.040 --> 0:11:25.520
<v Speaker 2>to walk past Macy's as I always do, but today

0:11:25.559 --> 0:11:27.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to go in. Okay, I'm going to do

0:11:27.160 --> 0:11:29.360
<v Speaker 2>a store walk. Is what the kid? What the retail

0:11:29.400 --> 0:11:31.000
<v Speaker 2>anamals call it a store walk? And I'm going to

0:11:31.080 --> 0:11:33.640
<v Speaker 2>check if John Tucker's would an escalator.

0:11:33.760 --> 0:11:35.040
<v Speaker 4>Still there, We're counting on you.

0:11:35.160 --> 0:11:39.240
<v Speaker 2>Okay, report back, Mary, just real quick, thirty seconds. What's

0:11:39.280 --> 0:11:40.960
<v Speaker 2>macy saying about the consumer out there?

0:11:42.559 --> 0:11:45.360
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, so they're saying that the lower end consumer is

0:11:45.440 --> 0:11:49.400
<v Speaker 5>really feeling pinched and that's where they're seeing some challenges

0:11:49.440 --> 0:11:51.520
<v Speaker 5>on some of the price increases on their lower price

0:11:51.559 --> 0:11:55.640
<v Speaker 5>point items. But the higher middle income, in the higher

0:11:55.640 --> 0:12:00.920
<v Speaker 5>income consumer is resilient and they haven't lashed or battered

0:12:00.960 --> 0:12:04.160
<v Speaker 5>and I with higher prices that they took to offset

0:12:04.240 --> 0:12:05.640
<v Speaker 5>tariffs and they're still buying.

0:12:06.720 --> 0:12:09.800
<v Speaker 2>Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Intelligence coming up after this.

0:12:13.760 --> 0:12:17.440
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:12:17.520 --> 0:12:20.600
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple, Cocklay and Android

0:12:20.640 --> 0:12:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand wherever

0:12:24.000 --> 0:12:27.120
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:12:27.720 --> 0:12:30.600
<v Speaker 2>We continue to get some earnings from the retailers. Today,

0:12:30.640 --> 0:12:34.160
<v Speaker 2>Dollar Tree came out with some numbers, pretty good numbers.

0:12:34.200 --> 0:12:36.000
<v Speaker 2>The street likes that. The stock's up three point four

0:12:36.040 --> 0:12:40.040
<v Speaker 2>percent today. Dollar Tree is up fifty percent year to date,

0:12:40.080 --> 0:12:44.040
<v Speaker 2>So a great move for that company, that stock. Let's

0:12:44.080 --> 0:12:47.600
<v Speaker 2>turn to Lily Meyer here, Bloomberg Deals reporter for Bloomberg News.

0:12:47.640 --> 0:12:51.120
<v Speaker 2>She covers all the retail companies out there. Talk to

0:12:51.200 --> 0:12:53.320
<v Speaker 2>us about Dollar Tree. What did they say here in

0:12:53.360 --> 0:12:54.280
<v Speaker 2>the latest earnings.

0:12:54.440 --> 0:12:56.920
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, so dollar Tree did well this quarter at matt

0:12:57.000 --> 0:13:01.480
<v Speaker 6>expectations on revenue and same store sale, and it raised

0:13:01.520 --> 0:13:05.320
<v Speaker 6>its profit outlook for the year. I think they really

0:13:05.320 --> 0:13:08.359
<v Speaker 6>have hit a niche in being able to capture consumers,

0:13:08.760 --> 0:13:12.199
<v Speaker 6>both lower end consumers who need cheaper goods and then

0:13:12.280 --> 0:13:14.600
<v Speaker 6>high income consumers who are looking to trade down.

0:13:15.160 --> 0:13:17.640
<v Speaker 4>So, I mean, what do we think about elasticity of

0:13:17.679 --> 0:13:19.800
<v Speaker 4>the lower end consumer right now? Because I mean, if

0:13:19.840 --> 0:13:21.600
<v Speaker 4>you think about Walmart, I used to think of this

0:13:21.640 --> 0:13:24.480
<v Speaker 4>as a company that you know, was a cheaper place

0:13:24.559 --> 0:13:26.200
<v Speaker 4>to shop, but it seems as though it's appealing to

0:13:26.320 --> 0:13:29.280
<v Speaker 4>multiple consumer types. But it seems as though Dollar Tree

0:13:29.320 --> 0:13:31.520
<v Speaker 4>really is a great place for the lower end consumer.

0:13:31.880 --> 0:13:34.560
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, and actually recently Dollar Tree has been looking to

0:13:34.679 --> 0:13:37.520
<v Speaker 6>kind of break into that higher income shopper as well.

0:13:37.600 --> 0:13:41.040
<v Speaker 6>So it has this pricing strategy, so it has some

0:13:41.320 --> 0:13:44.200
<v Speaker 6>products that are still cheaper, but then it has some

0:13:44.360 --> 0:13:47.320
<v Speaker 6>it's getting more products that are more expensive.

0:13:48.280 --> 0:13:52.760
<v Speaker 2>What is Dollar Tree saying about its core consumer out there?

0:13:53.320 --> 0:13:55.160
<v Speaker 2>Who is that core consumer and how are they behaving?

0:13:55.520 --> 0:13:55.720
<v Speaker 7>Yeah?

0:13:55.760 --> 0:13:58.080
<v Speaker 6>So I think it's core consumer is still a lower

0:13:58.160 --> 0:14:01.000
<v Speaker 6>income shopper. Eighty five percent of their products are two

0:14:01.040 --> 0:14:03.559
<v Speaker 6>dollars an under, so they really still have a lot

0:14:03.559 --> 0:14:06.559
<v Speaker 6>of value. So they're seeing those shoppers continue to go in.

0:14:06.640 --> 0:14:09.960
<v Speaker 6>But this quarter they saw traffic down and they attributed

0:14:10.000 --> 0:14:11.520
<v Speaker 6>that to tariff increases.

0:14:12.280 --> 0:14:14.080
<v Speaker 4>See I missed when things were actually a dollar, a

0:14:14.120 --> 0:14:15.240
<v Speaker 4>dollar Tree, a dollar general.

0:14:15.720 --> 0:14:19.720
<v Speaker 2>Did you say two dollars? I remember? Should we change

0:14:19.720 --> 0:14:22.680
<v Speaker 2>the name? And I remember it? John, and I remember

0:14:22.680 --> 0:14:26.320
<v Speaker 2>the five and dime and Penny can do it yep, exactly,

0:14:26.480 --> 0:14:28.600
<v Speaker 2>dating ourselves ourselves, all.

0:14:28.560 --> 0:14:30.960
<v Speaker 4>Right, So what's the takeaway in terms of the outlook.

0:14:31.000 --> 0:14:33.280
<v Speaker 4>I mean, you talked about tariff still being a drag here.

0:14:33.680 --> 0:14:36.120
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, so tariffs will really dragged this quarter. They said

0:14:36.120 --> 0:14:38.440
<v Speaker 6>that's gonna lessen. So I think this was the quarter

0:14:38.480 --> 0:14:41.720
<v Speaker 6>where we're really seeing the biggest tariff impact. It'll be

0:14:41.800 --> 0:14:46.000
<v Speaker 6>really interesting to see what they predict for consumers next year.

0:14:46.160 --> 0:14:49.120
<v Speaker 6>I'm interested to hear about that and also what they

0:14:49.160 --> 0:14:51.440
<v Speaker 6>see for holiday if they continue to see high income

0:14:51.480 --> 0:14:53.120
<v Speaker 6>shoppers trading down for gifts?

0:14:53.400 --> 0:14:58.080
<v Speaker 2>Is dollar stores do they see a surgeon sales seasonal

0:14:58.120 --> 0:15:00.280
<v Speaker 2>surge and sales from holiday sales? Is that? Do they

0:15:00.280 --> 0:15:02.120
<v Speaker 2>see that like a department store would.

0:15:02.480 --> 0:15:04.520
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I don't know if it's the same surge, but

0:15:04.680 --> 0:15:06.560
<v Speaker 6>you know, they sell a lot of gift wrapping and

0:15:06.640 --> 0:15:09.840
<v Speaker 6>gift bags and some of those smaller gifts stocking stuffers,

0:15:09.880 --> 0:15:11.440
<v Speaker 6>so I think they see a lot of that around

0:15:11.480 --> 0:15:12.119
<v Speaker 6>the holidays.

0:15:12.600 --> 0:15:14.320
<v Speaker 4>So what are we seeing in terms of just the

0:15:14.320 --> 0:15:16.560
<v Speaker 4>broader read on the retail space. This kind of gives

0:15:16.600 --> 0:15:18.320
<v Speaker 4>us a picture of the lower end consumer, But what

0:15:18.360 --> 0:15:19.480
<v Speaker 4>are you seeing across the board?

0:15:19.840 --> 0:15:22.880
<v Speaker 6>So broadly, we're really still seeing consumer spend. So there

0:15:22.880 --> 0:15:25.400
<v Speaker 6>hasn't been that massive pullback that I think some of

0:15:25.480 --> 0:15:28.720
<v Speaker 6>us were imagining might happen. We're still seeing consumer spend,

0:15:28.760 --> 0:15:31.080
<v Speaker 6>but they're really value driven, so they're looking for the

0:15:31.080 --> 0:15:34.240
<v Speaker 6>best deals they can get. They're trading down when they

0:15:34.240 --> 0:15:36.360
<v Speaker 6>need to. They're stocking up on essentials.

0:15:37.320 --> 0:15:41.920
<v Speaker 2>How promotional are retailers right now? Because I mean, I know,

0:15:42.200 --> 0:15:44.840
<v Speaker 2>talking to Punam Gooyle, the retail analysts of Bloomberg Intelligence,

0:15:44.880 --> 0:15:47.400
<v Speaker 2>he says, you know, the more promotions you see out there,

0:15:47.440 --> 0:15:49.320
<v Speaker 2>that's going to be that goes right to the margins,

0:15:49.360 --> 0:15:52.400
<v Speaker 2>the profit margins of some of these retailers. What are

0:15:52.400 --> 0:15:54.240
<v Speaker 2>we seeing this season, that's a good question.

0:15:54.320 --> 0:15:57.040
<v Speaker 6>So this season, we've actually seen some retailers pull back

0:15:57.080 --> 0:16:01.000
<v Speaker 6>on deals to protect their margin. So companies are doing

0:16:01.000 --> 0:16:02.920
<v Speaker 6>that as part of a broader strategy, and then some

0:16:03.000 --> 0:16:05.640
<v Speaker 6>are having to do that because of tariff. So you know,

0:16:05.720 --> 0:16:08.640
<v Speaker 6>for Black Friday, typically they'd offer big discounts and some

0:16:08.720 --> 0:16:11.040
<v Speaker 6>are pulling back or not offering discounts at all.

0:16:11.800 --> 0:16:14.920
<v Speaker 4>So consumers have still been broadly spending in the retail space.

0:16:15.000 --> 0:16:16.240
<v Speaker 4>What are they spending on?

0:16:16.440 --> 0:16:16.720
<v Speaker 5>Is it?

0:16:16.920 --> 0:16:20.080
<v Speaker 4>You know, are we spending money on essentials right now,

0:16:20.160 --> 0:16:21.200
<v Speaker 4>skipping this lurging?

0:16:21.680 --> 0:16:24.960
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, yeah, that's exactly it. So this Black Friday, we

0:16:25.000 --> 0:16:26.680
<v Speaker 6>talked to a lot of folks who were saying they're

0:16:26.680 --> 0:16:29.960
<v Speaker 6>going to just get essentials this Black Friday, so instead

0:16:29.960 --> 0:16:33.960
<v Speaker 6>of buying you know, a Lake Crusette, Dutch oven they were.

0:16:34.000 --> 0:16:35.880
<v Speaker 6>We talked to someone who instead was going to buy

0:16:35.920 --> 0:16:38.320
<v Speaker 6>like three bags of forty pound dog food.

0:16:38.560 --> 0:16:43.880
<v Speaker 2>Oh okay, yeah, I don't have a dog for them,

0:16:43.960 --> 0:16:45.000
<v Speaker 2>right yeah.

0:16:45.520 --> 0:16:49.800
<v Speaker 6>Dot Com so really using you know, deals to get

0:16:49.800 --> 0:16:52.360
<v Speaker 6>things that they need for themselves rather than getting that

0:16:52.400 --> 0:16:53.880
<v Speaker 6>big ticket item they waited for.

0:16:54.400 --> 0:16:57.560
<v Speaker 2>What I learned from talking to retail folks is omni

0:16:57.840 --> 0:17:02.000
<v Speaker 2>channel retail, which is you use both the online and

0:17:02.080 --> 0:17:04.320
<v Speaker 2>the bricks and mortar and maybe you look at something

0:17:04.320 --> 0:17:06.359
<v Speaker 2>online then you want to go touch and feel it,

0:17:06.440 --> 0:17:07.720
<v Speaker 2>or maybe you order it then you pick it up

0:17:07.760 --> 0:17:10.360
<v Speaker 2>at the store. Omni channels that still a thing.

0:17:10.880 --> 0:17:13.399
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, yeah, So we were out there on Black Friday

0:17:13.440 --> 0:17:15.320
<v Speaker 6>and some of the stores, and you know, while a

0:17:15.359 --> 0:17:18.200
<v Speaker 6>lot of people have switched their holiday shopping to be online,

0:17:18.240 --> 0:17:21.080
<v Speaker 6>we still saw a ton of people in stores, especially

0:17:21.119 --> 0:17:24.000
<v Speaker 6>at stores with really good deals and stores that appear

0:17:24.240 --> 0:17:28.000
<v Speaker 6>appealed to young shoppers. So brands like Addicted and Princess

0:17:28.040 --> 0:17:30.960
<v Speaker 6>Polly that are in malls were really flooded with young people.

0:17:31.720 --> 0:17:34.840
<v Speaker 2>Stay with us more from Bloomberg Intelligence coming up after this.

0:17:38.760 --> 0:17:42.440
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us Live

0:17:42.520 --> 0:17:45.600
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple, Cocklay and Android

0:17:45.640 --> 0:17:48.919
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand wherever

0:17:49.000 --> 0:17:52.120
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:17:52.800 --> 0:17:55.400
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk a little luxury here. That's right down John

0:17:55.400 --> 0:17:58.760
<v Speaker 2>Tucker's alley. Here, Debi, and she's the expert luxury goods

0:17:58.760 --> 0:18:03.199
<v Speaker 2>analyst of Bloomberg Intelligence. She's based in London. There, just

0:18:03.200 --> 0:18:05.560
<v Speaker 2>give us some kind of a post mortem. How was

0:18:05.600 --> 0:18:09.280
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty five for the luxury companies and maybe what's

0:18:09.280 --> 0:18:10.240
<v Speaker 2>the oulok for twenty six?

0:18:12.200 --> 0:18:17.359
<v Speaker 7>Hi. Yeah, So we started out twenty twenty five with

0:18:17.560 --> 0:18:20.760
<v Speaker 7>an expectation that we'd moved back to growth, and that

0:18:20.880 --> 0:18:24.120
<v Speaker 7>certainly didn't materialize through the first half of the year,

0:18:25.680 --> 0:18:28.560
<v Speaker 7>but we seem to be ending at around three to

0:18:28.600 --> 0:18:32.640
<v Speaker 7>four percent growth as we exit twenty twenty five. Now,

0:18:32.640 --> 0:18:36.439
<v Speaker 7>the US has been robust, Middle East doing very well,

0:18:36.680 --> 0:18:38.960
<v Speaker 7>but particularly in the first half the year, it was

0:18:39.080 --> 0:18:42.080
<v Speaker 7>China which was the drag. And what we've noticed is

0:18:42.119 --> 0:18:45.879
<v Speaker 7>we end the year. We've actually just heard on a

0:18:45.920 --> 0:18:49.440
<v Speaker 7>fireside chat over the last few days from Laurel where

0:18:49.440 --> 0:18:52.320
<v Speaker 7>they're mentioning high end beauty doing very well out of

0:18:52.359 --> 0:18:56.639
<v Speaker 7>the US, but also in China too, so they're adding

0:18:56.680 --> 0:18:59.680
<v Speaker 7>to what we've heard from the luxury companies where we've

0:18:59.720 --> 0:19:04.040
<v Speaker 7>seen two thirds of luxury companies and most of the

0:19:04.080 --> 0:19:07.440
<v Speaker 7>top ten switching to growth in China in Q three

0:19:07.800 --> 0:19:10.240
<v Speaker 7>from a low base from negatives a year ago. But

0:19:10.359 --> 0:19:13.960
<v Speaker 7>actually that we're calling green shoots into the end of year.

0:19:15.200 --> 0:19:17.160
<v Speaker 4>How are these companies holding up as it re leads

0:19:17.200 --> 0:19:18.320
<v Speaker 4>to tariff overhangs.

0:19:20.440 --> 0:19:23.680
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, so we did a lot of work around May

0:19:23.760 --> 0:19:26.520
<v Speaker 7>time and again through July and August with the different

0:19:26.600 --> 0:19:30.840
<v Speaker 7>tariff rates moving around, and what we've actually seen it

0:19:30.920 --> 0:19:36.400
<v Speaker 7>was less detrimental overall in our numbers. We probably think

0:19:36.440 --> 0:19:39.639
<v Speaker 7>that EPs won't be pulled as much as was expected

0:19:39.680 --> 0:19:42.880
<v Speaker 7>because there have been some cost savings and the biggest

0:19:42.920 --> 0:19:46.440
<v Speaker 7>companies and those that were where brands were really in

0:19:46.520 --> 0:19:49.959
<v Speaker 7>favor have managed to pass on price and generally because

0:19:50.000 --> 0:19:54.800
<v Speaker 7>these companies operate on high gross margin, the cost into

0:19:54.840 --> 0:19:57.520
<v Speaker 7>the US, they've moved around two to FOXX and on

0:19:57.600 --> 0:20:00.520
<v Speaker 7>additional price into the US as well well as two

0:20:00.680 --> 0:20:03.320
<v Speaker 7>three percent from the beginning of the year, So some

0:20:03.359 --> 0:20:06.320
<v Speaker 7>of those brands have absorbed passing through six seven percent

0:20:06.400 --> 0:20:10.000
<v Speaker 7>pricing to the US consumer. And we think into twenty

0:20:10.080 --> 0:20:13.480
<v Speaker 7>twenty six that moves nearer to two to three percent overall,

0:20:13.600 --> 0:20:17.320
<v Speaker 7>so it should be less intimidating for the consumer overall

0:20:17.640 --> 0:20:20.560
<v Speaker 7>twenty twenty six. So it's one of our drivers for

0:20:20.640 --> 0:20:21.600
<v Speaker 7>the year ahead.

0:20:22.119 --> 0:20:25.040
<v Speaker 2>DEV talk to us about the Chinese consumer. We don't

0:20:25.080 --> 0:20:27.399
<v Speaker 2>see the Chinese consumer here. I'm going to walk the

0:20:27.440 --> 0:20:30.800
<v Speaker 2>Penn station today, walk down Fifth Avenue, Madison Avenue. I'll

0:20:30.800 --> 0:20:32.600
<v Speaker 2>see a lot of Europeans. I see a lot of

0:20:32.640 --> 0:20:36.320
<v Speaker 2>American tours. I won't see many from Asia. Are they

0:20:36.560 --> 0:20:39.240
<v Speaker 2>not traveling? So is that an impact for New York

0:20:39.359 --> 0:20:41.160
<v Speaker 2>and London and Paris and things like that.

0:20:42.760 --> 0:20:45.720
<v Speaker 7>We actually have a survey out of our Asia office

0:20:45.760 --> 0:20:50.680
<v Speaker 7>that we've just incorporated into a travel document which will

0:20:50.680 --> 0:20:53.320
<v Speaker 7>be producing. But this piece of work has already produced

0:20:53.760 --> 0:20:59.560
<v Speaker 7>and actually on October versus May. The China consumer is

0:20:59.600 --> 0:21:03.080
<v Speaker 7>looking to travel more into Europe to start with. So

0:21:03.119 --> 0:21:06.720
<v Speaker 7>that's the first big positive. I think part of that

0:21:07.119 --> 0:21:10.639
<v Speaker 7>is just on the way the tariff situation has gone maybe,

0:21:10.960 --> 0:21:12.760
<v Speaker 7>so that would be the first time that we're looking

0:21:12.800 --> 0:21:15.320
<v Speaker 7>for them to come back so versus three months ago.

0:21:15.320 --> 0:21:18.480
<v Speaker 7>They're looking to traveling outside of Asia. But overall, what

0:21:18.520 --> 0:21:24.399
<v Speaker 7>we call the China cohort that's actually really operate in

0:21:24.560 --> 0:21:28.119
<v Speaker 7>more avidly across the Asia region. We're not seeing so

0:21:28.200 --> 0:21:31.359
<v Speaker 7>much travel from Chinese into Japan, and of course we

0:21:31.400 --> 0:21:35.880
<v Speaker 7>know that there are there's some political commentary there as well,

0:21:35.920 --> 0:21:37.960
<v Speaker 7>so we wouldn't expect that to pick up next year.

0:21:38.040 --> 0:21:43.120
<v Speaker 7>But we are seeing Korea, Singapore, Australia and others being

0:21:43.200 --> 0:21:46.520
<v Speaker 7>positive and the first move to Europe should hopefully indicate

0:21:46.560 --> 0:21:48.840
<v Speaker 7>that towards the end of the year, and as tariffs

0:21:48.840 --> 0:21:51.760
<v Speaker 7>settle more in twenty twenty six, that we see some

0:21:51.840 --> 0:21:54.400
<v Speaker 7>of that return to the US as well.

0:21:54.560 --> 0:21:56.760
<v Speaker 4>And sticking with China, how are we thinking about supply

0:21:56.880 --> 0:21:58.960
<v Speaker 4>chain operations as it leads to a lot of these

0:21:59.160 --> 0:22:01.960
<v Speaker 4>luxury for especially stemming from China.

0:22:04.000 --> 0:22:09.440
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, so if we think about maybe if we look

0:22:09.440 --> 0:22:12.960
<v Speaker 7>at it from some of the aspirational or entry level

0:22:13.000 --> 0:22:19.520
<v Speaker 7>luxury companies, then they will have some production moving around

0:22:20.080 --> 0:22:23.480
<v Speaker 7>the Asia region. But if we think about the heritage

0:22:23.560 --> 0:22:27.240
<v Speaker 7>traditional higher end luxury companies, then most of their production

0:22:27.600 --> 0:22:31.560
<v Speaker 7>is France, Italy, some Portugal, some parts of southern Spain.

0:22:32.160 --> 0:22:34.600
<v Speaker 7>Not so much going on in the Asia region, and

0:22:34.680 --> 0:22:39.159
<v Speaker 7>so they've been able to manage on the twenty percent

0:22:39.280 --> 0:22:42.800
<v Speaker 7>tariff from made in Europe over to the US more

0:22:42.920 --> 0:22:46.240
<v Speaker 7>so than some of the peer group. For example, one

0:22:46.280 --> 0:22:49.520
<v Speaker 7>of our entry level that we call branded affordable jewelry

0:22:49.560 --> 0:22:53.800
<v Speaker 7>Pandora producers out of Thailand. It's really suffered in terms

0:22:53.800 --> 0:22:56.600
<v Speaker 7>of share price this year versus some of the Asian

0:22:56.840 --> 0:22:59.639
<v Speaker 7>retail jewelers who've done very very well on the price

0:22:59.640 --> 0:22:59.920
<v Speaker 7>of goal.

0:23:02.400 --> 0:23:05.000
<v Speaker 2>So you got to explain this whole handbag thing to me.

0:23:05.119 --> 0:23:09.520
<v Speaker 2>Deb I was in Italy in September towards some place factories,

0:23:09.560 --> 0:23:11.800
<v Speaker 2>f artists and shops where they make these handbags and

0:23:11.800 --> 0:23:14.719
<v Speaker 2>they sell them for tens of thousands of dollars in euros.

0:23:14.840 --> 0:23:16.520
<v Speaker 2>What is going on there? Who buys that?

0:23:18.040 --> 0:23:22.520
<v Speaker 7>Yeah? It has I always say, if you bought a Ermez,

0:23:22.880 --> 0:23:26.399
<v Speaker 7>you have a just as good or a better correlation

0:23:26.560 --> 0:23:29.959
<v Speaker 7>than if you'd have held gold. So I think that

0:23:30.880 --> 0:23:36.639
<v Speaker 7>you know, these bags, particularly for sought after material, the

0:23:36.640 --> 0:23:40.320
<v Speaker 7>craftsmanship and the fact that they have continued value, are

0:23:40.359 --> 0:23:44.720
<v Speaker 7>seen as investment pieces, and so we have the middle ground.

0:23:44.720 --> 0:23:46.879
<v Speaker 7>You know, if we look over the last year and

0:23:47.000 --> 0:23:48.840
<v Speaker 7>one of the things that we think for twenty twenty

0:23:48.880 --> 0:23:53.520
<v Speaker 7>six bags from Tapestry, from Coach, Ralph Lauren others as

0:23:53.520 --> 0:23:56.320
<v Speaker 7>well as ready to wear have done very very well,

0:23:56.400 --> 0:23:58.920
<v Speaker 7>resonated with a consumer who's been a little bit more

0:23:58.960 --> 0:24:02.800
<v Speaker 7>skeptical on the consumer sentiment side and may be shopped

0:24:02.840 --> 0:24:06.360
<v Speaker 7>around one thousand dollars or so, but at the very

0:24:06.400 --> 0:24:09.840
<v Speaker 7>high end there hasn't been much of a move, so

0:24:09.880 --> 0:24:13.640
<v Speaker 7>we've seen ms Brunello, Kuchnelli and others doing very very

0:24:13.680 --> 0:24:14.720
<v Speaker 7>well at that high end.

0:24:15.440 --> 0:24:20.119
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:24:20.320 --> 0:24:23.800
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each

0:24:23.800 --> 0:24:27.560
<v Speaker 1>weekday ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

0:24:27.680 --> 0:24:31.200
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:24:31.640 --> 0:24:34.560
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:24:34.960 --> 0:24:37.200
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg terminal.